reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @stephen_taylor
@stephen_taylor - Stephen Taylor
Canada is broken. Elections Canada website is down. https://t.co/ZYTgST0sEj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Elections Canada website appears to be down for some users. Some people are reporting the issue on social media, including one user on X who said elections.ca isn't working. The issue is causing concern. The speaker states that they have reached out directly regarding the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. One developing story, Omar, that we're keeping a close eye on the elections Canada website appearing to be down for some Canadians for many right now going on the website. This is what they're seeing. We actually experienced it here in our breaking news center as well. Though we were able to get on on another computer, though some people taking to social media tonight, sending out tweets like this on x.
Patrick saying elections.ca isn't working for me. Does anyone else have this issue? An obvious concern, Rachel. Yeah. So, Basheen Omar, we have reached out direct
@stephen_taylor - Stephen Taylor
The CBC sued the Conservative Party and tried to scrub this video from the internet. The CBC spent $400k of your money and lost the lawsuit. The judge said this video does not violate copyright laws. Make sure you save it because it's hard to find. https://t.co/EAlNwfSLQy
Video Transcript AI Summary
What's changed since 2015? The federal deficit could exceed $20 billion. A ruling found Prime Minister Justin Trudeau broke several conflict of interest rules in four instances. We're still in conflict with certain veterans groups because their demands exceed our current capabilities.
Taxpayer dollars are being used to fund $12 million for energy-efficient refrigerators for a corporation owned by one of Canada's wealthiest families. Additionally, Gerald Butts and Katie Telford received over $200,000 in moving expenses. The Liberals have also paid Omar Khadr more than $10 million, causing division among Canadians. Trudeau's recent foreign trip to India has damaged his image, and SNC-Lavalin is embroiled in its own legal issues. Allegations of political interference have been denied, but this isn't the first time Trudeau has violated the conflict of interest act.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the difference between running with a record now and running in 2015? Well, what I can say now is look at what we've done. It's become the $1,000,000,000 question. How big will the federal deficit be? The deficit could rise above 20 $1,000,000,000.
Today, a ruling came down that prime minister Justin Trudeau has broken several conflict of interest rules.
Speaker 1: The prime minister broke the law in 4 different places, and that's just talking about conflict of interest actually.
Speaker 0: Why are we still fighting against certain veterans groups? Because they are asking for more than we are able to give right now. The fact is we work just try to reorder reorder the thoughts.
Speaker 2: $12,000,000 to install energy efficient refrigerators for a corporation that made $800,000,000 last year. Owned by the Westins, one of Canada's richest families worth 13 and a half $1,000,000,000.
Speaker 0: My question is, why does it have to be done with taxpayer dollars? Why do we have to fork out $12,000,000 to have law of laws?
Speaker 1: Gerald Butts and Katie Telfort had, in total, received over $200,000 in moving expenses. Liberals have apologized and paid more than $10,000,000 to Omar Carter, a payout which has divided Canadians right across the country.
Speaker 0: It's the first foreign trip Trudeau will come back from with his image tarnished. Trudeau's
Speaker 3: visit to India has seen a colossal failure. SNC Lavalin is in the middle of a legal fight of its own.
Speaker 0: I experienced a consistent and sustained effort to politically interfere. The allegations are false.
Speaker 2: This is not the first time the prime minister has been found to have contravened the conflict of interest act.
Speaker 0: What I can say now is look at what we've done.
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump has challenged Justin Trudeau's censorship laws, stating that US companies like YouTube and Meta can't comply with them. I believe Trudeau's policies are misaligning Canada with US interests, leading to less freedom and prosperity. Pierre Poilievre will address this issue.
@stephen_taylor - Stephen Taylor
Donald Trump just obliterated Justin Trudeau's censorship laws. Even if YouTube or Meta want to follow Trudeau's requests to block, remove, or shape information, as a US company they will be forbidden from doing so. https://t.co/Tv8NcJo0pr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Free speech is essential for a free country; without it, our rights will collapse. I plan to dismantle the left-wing censorship regime and restore free speech for all Americans.
First, I will sign an executive order banning federal agencies from colluding to censor lawful speech and eliminate federal funding for labeling domestic speech as misinformation. Second, the Department of Justice will investigate and prosecute those involved in online censorship. Third, I will push Congress to revise Section 230 to ensure digital platforms maintain neutrality and transparency. Fourth, we will end funding for nonprofits that support censorship and penalize universities involved in such activities. Lastly, Congress must pass a digital bill of rights, ensuring users have due process and the right to appeal content restrictions. Restoring free speech is vital for our democracy and the future of America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country. It's as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple just like dominoes, 1 by 1. They'll go down. That's why today, I'm announcing my plan to shatter the left wing censorship regime and to reclaim the right to free speech for all Americans.
And reclaim is a very important word in this case because they've taken it away. In recent weeks, bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister group of deep state bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left wing activists, and depraved corporate news media have been conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people. They have collaborated to suppress vital information on everything from elections to public health. The censorship cartel must be dismantled and destroyed and it must happen immediately, and here's my plan. 1st, within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding with any organization, business, or person to censor, limit, categorize, or impede the lawful speech of American citizens.
I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as mis or disinformation, and I will begin the process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship directly or indirectly, whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health, Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are. 2nd, I will order the Department of Justice to investigate all parties involved in the new online censorship regime, which is absolutely destructive and terrible, and to aggressively prosecute any and all crimes identified. These include possible violations of federal civil rights law, campaign finance laws, federal election law, securities law and antitrust laws, the Hatch Act, and a host of other potential criminal civil regulatory and constitutional offenses. To assist in these efforts, I am urging house Republicans to immediately send preservation letters, and we have to do this right now to the Biden administration, the Biden campaign, and every Silicon Valley tech giant, ordering them not to destroy evidence of censorship. 3rd, upon my inauguration as president, I will ask congress to send the bill to my desk revising section 230 to get big online platforms out of censorship business.
From now on, digital platform should only qualify for immunity protection under section 230 if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness, and nondiscrimination. We should require these platforms to increase their efforts to take down unlawful content such as child exploitation and promoting terrorism while dramatically curtailing their power to arbitrarily restrict lawful speech. 4th, we need to break up the entire toxic censorship industry that has arisen under the false guise of tackling so called mis and disinformation. The federal government should immediately stop funding all nonprofits and academic programs that support this authoritarian project. If any US university is discovered to have engaged in censorship activities or election interferences in the past, such as flagging social media content for removal of blacklisting, Those universities should lose federal research dollars and federal student loan support for a period of 5 years and maybe more.
We should also enact new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureaucrats who partner with private entities to do an end run around the constitution and deprive Americans of their first, 4th, and 5th amendment rights. In other words, deprive them of their vote. And once you lose those elections and once you lose your borders like we have, you no longer have a country. Furthermore, to confront the problems of major platforms being infiltrated by legions of former deep staters and intelligence officials. There should be a 7 year calling off period before any employee of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DNI, DHS, or DOD is allowed to take a job at a company possessing vast quantities of US user data.
5th, the time has finally come for congress to pass a digital bill of rights. This should include a right to digital due process. In other words, government officials should need a court order to take down online content, not send information requests such as the FBI was sending to Twitter. Furthermore, when users of big online platforms have their content or accounts removed, throttled, shadow banned, or otherwise restricted, no matter what name they use, They should have the right to be informed that it's happening, the right to a specific explanation of the reason why, and the right to a timely appeal. In addition, all users over the age of 18 should have the right to opt out of content moderation and curation entirely and receive an unmanipulated stream of information if they so choose.
The fight for free speech is a matter of victory or death for America and for the survival of Western civilization itself. When I am president, this whole rotten system of censorship and information control will be ripped out of the system at large. There won't be anything left. By restoring free speech, we'll begin to reclaim our democracy and save our nation. Thank you, and god bless America.
@stephen_taylor - Stephen Taylor
Justin Trudeau has dramatically misaligned Canada with US policy and interests. We are becoming poorer and less free as a result. Pierre Poilievre will fix it.
@stephen_taylor - Stephen Taylor
Pierre Poilievre dusts off another apple and schools another reporter. https://t.co/X5Im3nE0no
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker defends their statement about the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge checkpoint being terrorism, citing media reports that the Canadian government presumed it to be so. They criticize CP for making false claims in an article and question CTV's responsibility for reporting on the incident. The speaker also mentions the awkward situation of CP attacking CTV's reporting, considering that CP works for CTV.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think it was responsible for you to call yesterday's explosion by the customs by the checkpoint at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism when no US or Canadian officials said that was the or authority said that was the case. And when the New York governor also said there was no evidence to suggest terrorism activity.
Speaker 1: Actually you're wrong. Are you a CP? Okay. So CP, by the way, CP, just for everyone's knowledge, did have to make 3 corrections for falsehoods That they put into a single article. I think that might be unprecedented.
I'm actually thinking about checking with the Guinness Book of World Records To see if there's ever been a news agency that has had to issue 3 corrections for patent falsehoods that they admit They had been made in 1 single article and now you've made yet another falsehood in your question. Where you are wrong Is that CTV reported that the government of Canada was presuming that the incident was terrorist. So, yeah, that was and that's what I said in my remarks. You're right. It was a media report.
Speaker 0: But it's a media report, but not Which
Speaker 1: is what I said in the house. I said there are media reports. What kind of statement? I didn't. I said there were media reports.
No. There's no distinction. What I said, and I was right, was that there were media reports Of a terror related event. By your admission, there were media reports of a terror related event. And that media report, according to CTV, unless you're questioning their integrity now, came from security officials in the Trudeau government.
So do you think the CTV was irresponsible in putting out that tweet? Do you sorry I'm asking and I I have already answered that. Do you do you think CTV was irresponsible to put that tweet out? Well, you just did comment. Okay.
So I, you know, I just hope you're not going to print something that you have to apologize for again. I should also add, I think CP does work for CTV. This is very awkward now where we have CP attacking someone that they do work for. CV is a, CTV is a client of CP. And now we have CP attacking CTVs reporting.
This is a very awkward issue. I don't I don't know if there's a a way that that the 2 agent news agencies can sort that out.