Speaker 0 alleges that Mark Levin has repeatedly called for murdering civilians in Gaza, including children, because they are Amalek or “stained by blood guilt.” They claim this constitutes a blood guilt argument and leads to collective punishment and genocide, describing it as the Israeli government’s attitude and stating that “we’re paying for that.”
Speaker 1 responds that they should defend themselves and that if there is collateral damage, that is unfortunate, emphasizing the need for Israel to defend itself.
Speaker 0 contends that twenty-five years ago in this country, people didn’t talk that way; blood guilt would imply being guilty by birth, which they say leads to genocide and is unchristian and unamerican. They claim that if someone said such a thing on television, they would be pulled off the air, and argue that saying “kill kids because you don’t like their parents” reflects the Israeli government’s attitude, a well-documented attitude, and that “we’re paying for that.”
Speaker 0: Mark Levin has repeatedly called for just murdering civilians, children in Gaza because they're Amulek or whatever. They're stained by blood guilt.
Speaker 1: And I'm supposed to, what, shed crocodile tears for what's going to happen to these people? I'm not. Oh, but don't hurt the civilians. Look. We have to defend ourselves.
The Israelis have to defend ourselves. And if there's collateral damage, well, that's too bad.
Speaker 0: Twenty five years ago in this country, people didn't talk that way. The idea of blood guilt, because that's what he's describing there. You're guilty because you were born, at which, of course, leads to collective punishment and genocide. That's the basis of genocide right there, that attitude. That was considered totally unchristian and unamerican because it is.
And if someone said something like that on television, I mean, he'd be probably pulled off the air for that. You should kill kids because you don't like their parents? That is their attitude. That's the Israeli government's attitude. Well documented attitude.
We're paying for that.
As a white Christian conservative in the US, I was taught to blindly support Israel and view Arabs as enemies. However, as I grew older and gained access to global information, I began questioning these beliefs. I realized that Western media and the church had misled us. I no longer believe in the good versus evil narrative. We were taught to see Arabs as terrorists and Israel as morally superior, but I now understand that media control shapes our perception. This conflict started with the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and land theft. The US and other imperialist nations oppress those who challenge their capitalist system. Despite claiming moral superiority, America faces numerous social issues. I have had to deconstruct and challenge my indoctrination. We cannot claim that all lives matter while supporting the bombing of innocent civilians. I stand with the oppressed in free Palestine.
Speaker 0: Growing up as a white Christian conservative in the United States, ever since I was a kid, I was taught to have this blinding, unwavering, loyalty, fealty to Israel. I was conditioned to believe that Israel was the promised land, and the Israelis were god's chosen people, and all the Arabs surrounding Israel just wanted to annihilate them and wipe them completely off map. We were taught that Mohammed was a false prophet, and those who were worshiping to Allah were worshiping to the wrong god. And we were taught that we were supposed to pledge allegiance to the United States, support the American military and their endeavors all across the world, but especially in the Middle East and their support for Israel. We were supposed to back that no matter what.
And to question anything would be un American. But now that I'm older and we have access to the world at our fingertips and I can see with my own 2 eyes what is going on. I began to question everything. I realized that we bought the lie that Western media propagates to us. We bought the lie that the American church or the Western church propagates to us.
I don't believe in the duality of the world. I don't believe that we are good, that America's good, that Christians are good, that Jewish people are good, and that Arabs and Muslims are bad and evil. We've always been taught that Arabs, Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, they're jihadists. They're terrorists, they're thugs, they're predators, they're savages. These are the words that we've always used to describe human beings.
We are taught that Israel has the right to self defense, that they are morally superior in this battle. But I now realize that he who controls the media controls the masses. And Israel has the power to not only control the narrative, but to control the way that the war is fought. We are taught that this war started from a Hamas terrorist attack on October 7th. But in reality, this war started 75 years ago with the start of the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people and the stealing of their land.
One thing I've learned about the US in other imperialist and colonizing nations is that they love to put their foot on other people's neck and then act shocked when they fight back. Any nation that tries to employ a system other than the United States capitalistic system, we will automatically cut them off, sanction them, put our foot on their neck, don't give them access to the US economy and the rest of the world, and then we will look at them and say, Look. They failed. That doesn't work. Their system doesn't work.
And we're supposedly the wealthiest nation in the world, but we've got 1,000,000 in prison. We've got 1,000,000 on the street homeless. We got 1,000,000 without health care, and we say to the rest of the world that we're morally superior and our system's the best. And when our own people begin to question it and speak out against it. We were told that we are unpatriotic and unamerican.
And if we don't like it, go to those other countries whose system doesn't work because America has her foot on their neck. I've had to do so much deconstruction and deprogramming of everything that I've ever been taught, everything that I've ever been indoctrinated with living in the south of the United state. We love to say that we are all human. We claim that all lives matter, yet we're still supporting the bombing of innocent civilians. I've said it since day 1, and I'll say it again.
I will always stand on this side of the oppressed in free Palestine.
The speaker addresses the claim that the Bible has been altered, specifically mentioning the absence of Matthew 17 verse 21. They express disbelief and invite viewers to examine the Bible themselves. They confirm that verse 21 is indeed missing and suggest looking at an old 1800s Bible where the verse is present. This discovery leads them to question the trustworthiness of the Bible, as they learn that many other verses have been changed, added, or removed.
Speaker 0: Howdy y'all. And a lot of people have been telling me, hey, man. The Bible's been changed. There's stuff missing from it. And I said, no.
You joking. Well, they said Matthew 17 verse 21 ain't there in the Bible anymore. Someone took it out. Said you're full of it. So come over here come over here and take a look.
This is Matthew 17, and we're gonna go 19. There's 20 because of your little faith. Okay? It's got to be right after that verse 21. Verse 22.
There's no 21. So I told myself, let's go get an old bible. Get a old 1800s bible. Matthew 17/21. And what do you know?
Here's chapter 17 verse 21. Howbeit this kind goeth not out, but by prayer and fasting. So somebody changed the bible, and then I found out there's tons of verses that have been changed and are missing and are added to the bible. How can we trust this book?