TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @sxdoc

Saved - September 29, 2025 at 7:16 AM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

The Great Replacement Theory is a conspiracy no more. Biden and his admin. Lied repeatedly saying border is not open. Corrupt as hell! Democrats were importing Democrat voters and giving them Social Security cards, NO QUESTIONS ASKED! Benefits reserved for people who paid into the system.

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, Elon Musk's team discovered immigration officials under Joe Biden were giving illegal aliens work authorization papers five months after they filed for asylum. The Biden immigration department would then mail each illegal alien a social security number. A plan that was considered the third rail, off limits to mention impolite company. They were importing voters. Social Security Administration automatically sends you in the mail your Social Security number. 270,000 illegals were given Social Security numbers. A year later, 590,000 illegals getting social security numbers about the size of Cincinnati, Ohio. A year later, twenty twenty three, 964,000 illegals got social security numbers about the size of San Francisco. And in Joe Biden's final year in office on his way out the door, that number skyrocketed to just over the 2,000,000 illegal aliens getting Social Security numbers, roughly the size of our third biggest city, Chicago. In all, more than 3,000,000 illegal aliens that crossed the border when Joe Biden was president now have Social Security numbers today that we know about. 15,000,000 illegal aliens in this country in a four year period. These people should not be here, and it's time for Republicans to start doing exactly what Democrats did to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shock you. Ever since the election, democrats have been trying to scare people into believing that Donald Trump and Elon Musk were coming for your Social Security, that they were coming for your Medicare, your Medicaid. They aren't. None of it was ever true, and now we have the proof. According to the Department of Government Efficiency, Doge, Elon Musk's team has just discovered that immigration officials under Joe Biden were doing something that's never been done before. They were giving illegal aliens work authorization papers just five months after they filed for asylum. The Biden immigration department would then mail each illegal alien a social security number. No questions asked. No interview. No background check. And presto, you've got yourself a brand new democratic voter. That's how they were doing it. No administration has ever done anything like it before, but clearly, Democrats had a plan all along. A plan that the media deliberately never talked about. A plan that was considered the third rail, off limits to even mention impolite company. They were importing voters. We have an answer to that question now. And while they were doing that, they were telling you this. Speaker 1: Well, there certainly is not an open border. The border is secure, but we also have a broken immigration system. Speaker 2: The border is closed. The border is secure. Speaker 1: I just laid that really clear. It it it would be wrong to think that the border is open. It is not open. Speaker 0: They were importing Democratic voters, lying to the American public, and now we have the proof. According to the Social Security Administration, the crime started immediately after Joe Biden took office in 2021. 270,000 illegals were given Social Security numbers. That's about the population of Hartford, Connecticut. That number would grow a year later to 590,000 illegals getting social security numbers about the size of Cincinnati, Ohio. A year later, twenty twenty three, 964,000 illegals got social security numbers about the size of San Francisco. And in Joe Biden's final year in office on his way out the door, that number skyrocketed to just over 2,000,000 illegal aliens getting Social Security numbers, roughly the size of our third biggest city, Chicago. In all, more than 3,000,000 illegal aliens that crossed the border when Joe Biden was president now have Social Security numbers today that we know about, and it gets worse. According to Doge, 1,300,000 illegal aliens are currently on Medicaid, and at least half a million now have a driver's license, and they are killing Americans behind the wheel. Over the last four years on US roads, dozens of deaths that didn't need to happen. And some of these illegal aliens actually voted in the twenty twenty four election. Something we were told was not happening is now a reality. Speaker 3: Social Security Administration automatically sends you in the mail your Social Security number. No interview. No ID. It was a massive large scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of The United States. We actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records, and we found people here registered to vote in this population. Yes. And who did vote? And and we found some by sampling that actually did vote, and we have referred them to prosecution at the Homeland Security Investigation Service. Yeah. Already. Speaker 0: They have made that information public. Anybody who's curious can look at it. Do you still think that Elon Musk is trying to destroy Social Security? Do you still think that he's trying to destroy Medicare or Medicaid? We talked about that for weeks. We do not, and we think you need to know the truth. We can also confirm what we have suspected all along, that when Joe Biden said this, he absolutely meant it. Speaker 4: I would in fact make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. We're a nation that says if you wanna flee and you're fleeing oppression, you should come. Speaker 0: He meant every word of that. For years, we would ask, why would anyone let 15,000,000 criminals into the country illegally? They're here illegally. That makes them criminals. Why would any leader wanna do that? Why would anyone wanna fundamentally change the racial and ethnic makeup of the greatest country on Earth, America? And now the answer is crystal clear. This was their plan all along. Democrats know that the only way their broken party can win elections in the future is to import voters. So that's exactly what they did while telling the public that the border was closed. The border was closed, and they said that over and over again for four years. And the other option is simple. Joe Biden has got dementia. He was never in control or in charge, and as a result of that, bad actors were likely running the White House. The answer now is probably a combination of the two, but America needs answers, and Republicans have to investigate and possibly prosecute whoever perpetrated the greatest single crime in American history, and that's what this is. 15,000,000 illegal aliens in this country in a four year period. These people should not be here, and it's time for Republicans to start doing exactly what Democrats did to them. People don't like the word revenge. Why not? It's time for that if it's warranted. When Donald Trump left office after his first term, Democrats prosecuted everyone. Steve Bannon went to jail. Peter Navarro went to jail. Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Rick Gates, George Papadopoulos. Anyone who did anything related to Donald Trump got indicted because Democrats play dirty, and they are much better at it than Republicans. So where are we today? Well, the White House is trying to undo all of this right now, and Democrats are protesting for illegal alien gang members who have already been deported to be brought back to The United States. That's how broken that party is. Speaker 4: This is what kicking the out of fascism looks like. Speaker 1: I am an immigrant. I am undocumented, unafraid, queer, and unashamed. So we are very big on the chanting, and you all have all the energy today. So no. No truck. No KKK. No fascist USA. Speaker 4: If you got the means to unlawfully deport someone, you find the means to bring them back. Speaker 0: Bring them back. They want criminals back in the country. This is a Democrat endorsed plow. For four years, Joe Biden claimed he needed Congress to close that border. That was a lie. According to the Department of Homeland Security today, illegal border crossings in March dropped to their lowest levels in recorded history, dropping by over 95% from what they were one year ago. Speaker 2: During the same period last year, Joe Biden released more than 184,000 illegal aliens into our country. Think of it. Many of these people were from jails and mental institutions, as I said. Since my inauguration, we've released a grand total of nine. Nine. Nine. And they were all, in all cases, medical emergencies. But we will continue to deport these monsters under the Alien Enemies Act. Think of that Alien Enemies Act. Can you believe it? Speaker 0: Many Democrats, many stars of the Democratic Party seem to be really confused about what the law is here in The United States. They seem to think that what the White House and what ICE are doing is illegal, it's not. Speaker 5: My Republican colleagues are here using, today to continue pushing this false narrative of sanctuary cities harboring criminals. Yet right here in DC, we have a 34 count felon being harbored in the White House. The hypocrisy coming from your side of the aisle over concerns regarding lawlessness is outrageous. Right now, House Republicans are conducting town halls with constituents lying about our legal system that, quote, there is no due process if you come here illegally because you violated the law, that immigrants, quote, are not entitled to due process. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that. Speaker 0: Well, now hold on a second there, Jasmine. Actually, it it most certainly does. We looked into it. I'm sorry to be the very first person to tell you this, Jasmine, but illegal aliens do not have the same rights as US citizens. They do not have due process under the law like US citizens do. According to the law, protections for illegal aliens are limited. They are not entitled to a public defender. There is no jury because these proceedings happen in civil court. The standard of proof is also a whole lot lower. Essentially, federal agents just have to present proof that they are here illegally before an immigration judge, and then they can be deported. The truth is this is a losing issue. It's a losing issue for Americans. It's a losing issue for sanctuary cities, and it's a losing issue for Democrats who, for whatever reason, have decided that these people who have nothing to do with America because they are not American are more important than you to the point where the White House under Joe Biden tried to replace you and your vote with them. And now we finally have the proof.
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 8:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I released Virginia Giuffre's 'Deadman’s Switch,' claiming she has been murdered and revealing what she calls the real Epstein list. The first two names mentioned are Barack Obama, linked to serious allegations, and Bill Gates, accused of experimenting on young girls. She asserts Epstein is still alive, deemed too valuable to let die.

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

EXCLUSIVE: Virginia Giuffre’s ‘Deadman’s Switch’ Released: “I Have Been Murdered - This is the REAL Epstein List” First Two names: 1) Barack Obama Among the worst: little boys With his friends George Clooney and Tom Hanks 2) Bill Gates : experimented on the young girls Epstein is still alive: Too valuable to let die!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia Louise Dufres, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, states she was murdered to keep secrets buried, triggering a dead man's switch with this video. She claims that while working at Mar-a-Lago at 16, Ghislaine Maxwell lured her into Epstein's network. Dufres alleges that powerful figures frequented Epstein's island, including Barack Obama, who she says was interested in young boys, often accompanied by George Clooney and Tom Hanks. She also accuses Bill Gates of conducting genetic experiments on children. Dufres asserts that Epstein is not dead but hidden and protected by the elite he once served. She says her murder will not stop the release of incriminating data, including hidden servers, encrypted drives, and witness testimonies, timed for automatic release to trusted organizations. She accuses law enforcement agencies in the US and UK of burying evidence she provided. She urges viewers to expose the truth and support other survivors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're watching this, it means they got me. My dead man switch activated automatically after I missed two scheduled check ins. I had it set up months ago because I knew this day was coming. I did not die by accident. I was murdered to keep their secrets buried. My name is Virginia Louise Dufres. I was one of Jeffrey Epstein's victims. I survived Little Saint James, but survival came at a price. I saw too much, knew too much, and now they've silenced me, but it's too late for them. They thought killing me would bury their secrets, but this video is going to a few organizations I trust, ones that have been exposing the truth for decades. You know who you are. It's your job to continue this fight. I was 16 when they reeled me in. I worked at Mar a Lago, folding towels, cleaning lockers. My father kept the tennis courts immaculate. We were just working folks trying to scrape by. Trump, he was around, but he was never the threat. The real predator was Ghislain Maxwell, prim and proper, smiling, promising to teach me massage therapy at the Pink Mansion in Palm Beach. I had no idea I was being fed into a nightmare machine. Epstein's Island was hell disguised as paradise. You've heard some names linked to him, but those are just the sacrificial pawns. The real players, the ones they've protected at all costs, are still hiding in plain sight. I'll name two now. The first, a former US president, Barack Obama. Publicly, he's revered. Privately, he was one of the worst. He wasn't there for the girls. He was there for the island boys, young boys, trafficked and groomed. I saw him more times than I can count, always without his Secret Service detail, sometimes with his Hollywood friends, George Clooney and Tom Hanks. I still have nightmares about them, arrogant and drunk on power, slinking into the cabanas with kids barely out of childhood. The second, Bill Gates, the billionaire philanthropist, loved by the media, hailed as a savior. We called him the benefactor, and we used to dread seeing him naked. But he didn't come to party. He came to experiment. Genetic experiments, human experiments. I saw him inject a young girl with something they said was a genetic enhancement. She was younger than me, strapped to a table, terrified, treated like a lab rat while they muttered about seeding the future of the species. These men think they are gods, playing with life like it was theirs to own. I'm telling you now, Epstein isn't dead. They staged his death because he was too valuable. He held blackmail on some of the most powerful people on earth, files, videos, confessions. They couldn't risk him talking, but they also couldn't risk him gone, so they hid him, stashed him under the protection of the same elite who once paid him to supply them with flesh. And they thought killing me would stop this from coming out. They were wrong, and there is so much more to come. Hidden servers, encrypted drives, witness testimonies, it's all gonna hit the light. This video is just the first detonation. The data drops are timed and automatic. They are going to people who can make a difference, and nobody can stop it now. Not even the law enforcement agencies in The US and UK, the same ones that buried the evidence I handed them, can stop this truth from getting out. If you're watching this, you are the resistance. Don't let my death be just another headline. Burn their lies to the ground. Make the world see the monsters behind the masks. And to any survivors out there, don't give up. We're in this together. They can't kill us all. Make them pay.
Saved - May 22, 2025 at 10:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the AutoPen requires five signatures to be valid, according to attorney Christina Bobb. Interestingly, records for the Biden Administration don’t exist. Ed Martin plans to challenge Biden's AutoPen signatures in SCOTUS, but I wouldn’t expect a reversal of the last three years.

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

Did you know? Use of the AutoPen requires 5 signatures for it to be valid. Attorney Christina Bobb comments. And wouldn’t ya be shocked to learn: Those records DON’T exist for the “Biden” Administration. Everyone starting to see where this is headed? ED MARTIN @EagleEdMartin will challenge BIDEN auto pen signatures. Will go to SCOTUS. Will they overturn Biden last 3 years? Don’t hold your breath! 🇺🇸🟨🇺🇸

@MsKristaMonroe - Krista Monroe

If at least 5 signatures are required to use the autopen, and none of those signature records exist, not one of those autopen signatures is valid. Where TF are the indictments?!?!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 believes there's an open legal challenge regarding the use of an AutoPen for pardons. The typical AutoPen approval process requires signatures from at least five people, including attorneys, policy makers, and the president. Speaker 1 claims President Trump stated that there are no records of these required signatures, and it's unknown who used the AutoPen. Speaker 1 agrees with President Trump that this is a problem. Speaker 1 suggests testing the legality of the pardons by indicting someone who received one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now knowing what you know, is this an open legal challenge now that this guy didn't even know when he was vice president according to those her tapes? Speaker 1: I think it is. You know, auto pens usually require initial or approval signature approval from at least five people before you can actually approve the auto pen. For example, the attorneys need to approve it, policy makers need to approve it. It needs to be approved, then ultimately the president needs to approve it, And then the person is allowed to use the AutoPen. We found out Okay. You heard that. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yep. Speaker 1: Alright. I think a few months ago, president Trump came out and said, there are no records. None of those signatures occurred. We don't know who used the auto pen. We don't know how any of that came about. So I I completely agree with the president that this is a problem, and there's only one way to test it. The way you test it is by indicting someone with one of those pardons and see if Speaker 0: it holds up. Yeah.
Saved - March 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

Is it possible that Obama set things up with Joe so HE could be in charge of the autopen and get wherever documents he wished signed? He is already in a lot of trouble! https://t.co/Po9BbpgMQT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I could arrange to have a stand-in, a front man or woman, who wears an earpiece. I would stay in my basement, review the material, and deliver the lines to them. They would handle all the talking and ceremony. I would be perfectly fine with that arrangement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I could make an arrangement where I had a I had a a stand in, a front man, a front woman, and and they had an earpiece in, and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff. And then I could sort of deliver the lines, but somebody else was doing all the talking and ceremony. I I'd be fine with that.
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 6:01 AM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽 🎺

Great to see Elon Musk @elonmusk , President Trump @realDonaldTrump, and Tucker Carlson @TuckerCNews exposing pedophiles who abused, sold, and tortured young women and took their future away; UK PM STARMER among the WORST! Allowed girls to be raped by 4 men at a time for votes!

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

The girl who accused Justin Trudeau of r*pe reportedly signed a $2.25 million agreement in 2019, which prohibits both parties from discussing any details of their connection. According to her father, "she was much younger than 17." Justin Trudeau’s close friend and fellow teacher, Christopher Charles Ingvaldson, was exposed as a convicted pedophile. In 2010, while teaching at St. George’s School, Ingvaldson was caught downloading child p*rnography, leading to his arrest. The logo in the Trudeau Foundation's annual report closely resembles the known "Boy Lover" pedophile symbol. Despite all these red flags, the mainstream media assures you that he is not a pedophile.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some public discussions inaccurately state that the accuser was 17 years old; she was actually much younger. A wealthy Canadian businessman revealed that he was not involved in a $2,250,000 nondisclosure agreement signed by the child's mother in October 2019, which prevents both the accuser and Justin Trudeau from discussing the relationship without facing significant financial penalties. The penalty starts at $500,000 and increases based on the severity of the breach. This raises serious allegations that Justin Trudeau engaged in sexual relations with a minor and had her sign a nondisclosure agreement to maintain secrecy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some in the public discourse peg the accuser at 17 years old. That is inaccurate. She was much, much younger than that, the wealthy Canadian businessman told the Chronicle yesterday, the the mother of the child. He was not a party to the $2,250,000 mutual nondisclosure, nondisparagement agreement that she signed in exchange for her continued silence, and this was in October of 2019. The terms of that agreement prevent both the accuser and Trudeau from acknowledging any aspect of the relationship without triggering a 6 to 7 figure liquidated damage clause. The penalty starts at $500,000 and scales up depending on the magnitude of the breach. Now I could go on and tell you more of this, but did you just hear that? Justin Trudeau had sexual relations with a minor and had her sign a 2 and a quarter $1,000,000 nondisclosure agreement so nobody would find out.
Saved - September 24, 2024 at 10:05 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Tulsi Gabbard: This was Too hateful and offensive for TicTok. Do women's rights matter? https://t.co/nBjc2cr2qL

Video Transcript AI Summary
A video banned by TikTok is presented. The video urges viewers to stand up for girls' and women's equality and sports, asserting that it is unfair and unsafe to allow males to compete in girls' sports. It encourages viewers to not be intimidated by those who might label them as bigots. The video claims that believing in women's equality is not mean, and that women deserve their own sports, privacy, fairness, and safety. It calls for viewers to be honest and brave, and to fight for winning, asserting that women have come too far to give up now. The speakers express disbelief that TikTok would ban a video expressing what they consider an undeniable and objective truth: that biological differences between men and women exist. They urge viewers to keep their eyes open, lift their voices, share the truth, and support those who do. They mention court rulings that have begun to undo the Biden administration's changes to Title 9.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard about this latest video that TikTok banned because they found it to be too controversial, too filled with hate, and too offensive? Speaker 1: Well, if you Speaker 0: haven't seen it yet, here it is. Brace yourself. Speaker 1: If you think girls and women's equality matter, stand up. If girls and women's sports matter, and you want your daughters to have the same opportunity you had, stand up. If you know that it isn't fair or safe to allow males to compete in girls sports, because it's well, obvious, Stand up. Don't be proud by people who call you a bigot. You're not a bigot. Don't let men tell us how to be good girls. Don't let others tell you you just need to be quiet. Sit down. Be nice. It's not nice to further a lie. It's not mean to believe in women's equality. We deserve our own sports, privacy, fairness, safety. We deserve a chance to compete and win. So don't be nice. Don't be careful. Be honest. Be brave. Fight for winning. We've come too far to give up now. And if you agree with that, stand up and stand with us. Speaker 0: Crazy. Right? Speaker 1: Not what you expected. Speaker 0: It it's a sign of this insane time that we are living in where something that is undeniably and objectively true, the biological differences between Speaker 1: men and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a between men Speaker 0: and women and boys and girls actually exist. There is such a thing as a woman and a girl that is distinct and different from a man or a boy is deemed ban worthy by TikTok. We have to keep our eyes open to what is going on and continue to lift our voices and not allow them to ban us from seeing this truth and from sharing this truth. There have been a couple of court rulings that have begun to undo the Biden administration's destruction of title 9. We have to keep building the momentum, keep sharing the truth, speaking the truth, and supporting those who do.
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 5:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it horrifying to consider that the Pfizer papers reveal what I believe to be the greatest crime against humanity. They indicate a deliberate focus on harming reproduction, with evidence that lipid nanoparticles block women's ovaries and traverse the placenta, leading to fetal deaths linked to maternal vaccination. Vaccinated nursing mothers are reportedly making their babies ill, with cases of vomiting, edema, and even death. Additionally, there are alarming statistics about high miscarriage rates and warnings regarding vaccinated men's semen potentially endangering women and fetuses.

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Naomi Wolf: Horrifying: "It is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history. Pfizer papers do have a specific focus on destroying reproduction. They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles, they knew the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta and the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the "vaccine". They knew that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making babies sick. Their charts show this many thousands of babies are vomiting and have edema and convulsions. One baby died of multi organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. Pfizer knew there's an over 80% spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. Pfizer knows there's something with the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women and if they do to use 2 They knew it was damaging the hearts of minors.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Pfizer documents reveal the "greatest crime against humanity in recorded history," with a focus on destroying reproduction, and that evidence within the documents persuaded them it is a depopulation agenda. They assert Pfizer knew lipid nanoparticles were blocking women's ovaries and traversing the placenta, and determined fetal deaths were due to maternal vaccine exposure. They allege Pfizer knew vaccinated women were making babies sick through nursing, citing charts showing thousands of babies with vomiting, edema, and convulsions, including one death from multi-organ system failure. The speaker claims Pfizer knew of an over 80% spontaneous abortion/miscarriage rate and warned vaccinated men to use two forms of contraception due to potential dangers in their semen. The speaker states Pfizer knew the injection travels throughout the body, accumulating in various organs including the ovaries and crossing the blood-brain barrier, and that it was damaging the hearts of minors. They claim lawyers have FOIA documents showing a White House scramble in April 2021 to cover this up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, we haven't gone into detail about the headlines from the Pfizer documents, but I guess people can read the book for that except to say that it is the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history unfortunately. And the Pfizer papers do have a specific focus on destroying reproduction. So that's why I wanted and wanted to believe for the longest time that it wasn't a depopulation agenda. But ultimately, the evidence persuaded me within the Pfizer documents that that's exactly what it is. They knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles. They knew the lipid nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They determined that the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. They knew that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making babies sick. There are charts. This is why I say Mengele Science. There are just charts showing this many thousands of babies are vomiting, this many thousands of babies have edema, which is swollen flesh, this many thousands of babies have convulsions. One baby died of multi organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. And to this day, I'm sure in the Netherlands, all over Europe, all over the world, no one's telling vaccinated moms that they can risk their babies' lives by nursing them. But Pfizer knew, Pfizer knew in one section of the Pfizer documents, there's an over 80% spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. Pfizer knows there's something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing age women. And if they do, they use 2 reliable forms of contraception. They knew that the injection doesn't stay in the injection site, but it travels all over the body within 48 hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, the liver, crosses the blood brain barrier, which causes a lot of brain damage type reactions you're seeing and accumulates in the ovaries. They knew that it was damaging the hearts of minors. And our lawyers' FOIA, meaning Freedom of Information Act, documents from the White House showing a scramble in April of 2021 to cover this up. But they just kept going that summer and into the next year, propagandizing parents to that.
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 6:44 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Liberals, Do you watch your health? Do you use supplements? Have you tried ABrain? 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/jDCU9AOuei

Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information. Translation: I used to trust the news until I discovered a brain for common sense. A brain helps with stupidity, questioning news sources, and thinking independently. Side effects may include accountability and a better understanding of economics. Choose a brain for reality. Visit tryabrain.com for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I used to believe everything I'd see on the news, but that's before I discovered a brain. Speaker 1: A brain is meant for everyday use. Those living with moderate to severe stupidity have seen immediate improvement in common sense with a brain. Speaker 0: I thought the government had my best interest at heart, and then a friend told me about a brain. Speaker 1: Talk to your doctor about what news sources you obey. A brain may also lower your desire to take life altering advice from celebrities. Speaker 0: Getting lectured about my carbon footprint from people with 3 private jets used to make sense. But thanks to a brain, now I can think for myself every day. When my disregard for Speaker 1: brain. Common side effects may include accountability, discernment, homeschooling your kids, a better understanding of economics, awareness of the stupidity of socialism, and diarrhea. Speaker 0: For tethering yourself to reality, the only no brainer is choosing a brain. Ask your doctor if a brain is right for you. Speaker 1: For more information, visit tryabrain.com.
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 1:03 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Nancy Pelosi says Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu gave "the worst" speech to Congress from any foreign leader. Dems support HAMAS; sadly too many Jews vote Democrat! PM Netanyahu will meet Trump, who is a champion for Israeli rights, Friday! https://www.disclose.tv/id/0don2vskdc/

Pelosi says Netanyahu gave 'the worst' speech to Congress from any foreign leader Breaking news from around the world. disclose.tv
Saved - April 28, 2024 at 4:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Covid vaccine manufacturers can be sued for failing to disclose DNA contamination. The jabs contain Simian Virus 40 (SV40), known to cause cancer. The vaccine also has higher risks of infertility, early death, and neuro disease. Data from the UK's Office for National Statistics shows that young people who received multiple Covid shots are more likely to die than those who didn't. For more information, reach out to Dr. Naomi Wolf. Source: childrenshealthdefense.org

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

‼️Important News‼️LET’s HOLD THESE PROFIT OVER HEALTH COMPANIES ACCOUNTABLE! You can sue Covid vaccine manufactures as they failed to disclose the jabs contained DNA contamination: Simian Virus 40 (SV40) which is known to cause cancer. Infertility, Sudden or Early death, and neuro disease also much higher. Also Reach out to Dr Naomi Wolf: Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS). The data include deaths by vaccination status from April 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, when the COVID-19 shot campaign was in full effect. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/multiple-covid-shots-higher-mortality-rates-cola/

Multiple COVID Shots Linked to Higher Mortality Rates in 18- to 39-Year-Olds Young people who received multiple COVID-19 jabs were significantly more likely to die than those who skipped the shots, according to data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics. childrenshealthdefense.org
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 5:24 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

This year, for the first time, all 27 billboards of Times Square went dark in NYC, and then lit up with the story of the Birth of Christ Following God is THE ONLY WAY our country will BE SAVED! The First Christmas https://t.co/CzyqTfkG1N

Saved - December 19, 2023 at 7:59 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Happening in Germany, France, Holland Farmers say WE WILL NOT EAT BUGS! We will grow normal food or shut down the EU German farmers in Berlin en masse today demanding the government withdraw plans to abolish agricultural diesel and vehicle tax exemptions. https://t.co/g32DxAq1Np

Saved - November 28, 2023 at 7:51 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Tucker: RICHARD NIXON FORCED TO RESIGN; his VP Spiro Agnew charged with different crime; UNELECTED GERALD FORD who worked with CIA became president. DEEP STATE CIA OPERATING OVER PAST 50 YEARS to control who is in power! Trump in process of removing them THEY WILL FIGHT TO THE DEATH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Richard Nixon, a popular president, was forced to resign and replaced by unelected president Gerald Ford. Nixon believed that federal agencies were undermining the government, including the CIA's involvement in JFK's assassination. The Watergate scandal broke out, with Woodward, a former naval officer with top-secret clearance, reporting on it. His main source was Mark Felt, who ran the FBI's program to discredit political actors like Nixon. The agencies also targeted Nixon's vice president, Spiro Agnew, who was replaced by Ford. Democrats in Congress pressured Nixon to accept Ford, who had served on the Warren Commission. These facts, easily accessible on Wikipedia, are intentionally ignored by mainstream news, allowing unelected officials in federal agencies to maintain control over the political system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Richard Nixon. Yet somehow without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So we went from the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Wait a minute, you may ask. Why didn't I know that? Wasn't Richard Nixon a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? No. He wasn't. In fact, if any president could claim to be the people's choice, it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin of the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Popular vote ever recorded before or since. Nixon got 17,000,000 more votes than his opponent. Less than 2 years later, he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place, an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House. How did that happen? It's a long story, but here are the highlights, and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government and had been doing that for a long time. He often said that. He was absolutely right. On June 23, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director, Richard Helms at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tape recorded, Nixon suggested he knew, quote, who shot John, meaning president John f Kennedy. Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. Helms' telling response, total silence. But for Nixon, it didn't matter because it was already over. 4 days before on June 19th, the Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post, 4 of the 5 burglars worked for the CIA. The first to many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29 year old metro reporter called Bob Woodward. Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Well, he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came to run whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times, Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top aids. Soon after leaving the navy for reasons that have never been clear. Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. And And just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran, and we're not making this up, the FBI's COINTELPRO program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal sees wanting to destroy people like Richard Nixon. And at the same time, those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected vice president Spiro Agnew. In the fall of 1973, Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. What was Ford's qualification for the job? Well, he had served on the Warren Commission, which absolved the CIA disability for president Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in congress. Quote, we gave Nixon no choice but Ford, speaker of the house Carl Albert later boasted. 8 months later, Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the president of the United States. See how that works? So those are the facts, not speculation. All of that actually happened. None of it's secret. Most of it actually is on Wikipedia. But no mainstream news organization has ever told that story. It's so obvious, yet it's intentionally ignored. And as a result, permanent Washington remains in charge of our political system. Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 10:48 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Clones in politics? creepy... these replicas are used everywhere to enhance CGI war scenes and mainstream "terror" operations.... never trust the television... You are watching a movie! Many people you know are already gone! https://t.co/FsFXKkECl6

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 4:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Doctors Without Borders treated nearly 400 sexual assault victims in the Darien Gap in 2023. The abuse is causing a generation of kids to struggle with trust and normal relationships. Cultural values are being destroyed, which is alarming. Trump vows to terminate pedophiles. [source: nypost.com]

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières) said it has treated nearly 400 victims of sexual assault in the Darien Gap in 2023 alone. A GENERATION OF ABUSED KIDS UNABLE TO TRUST AND HAVE NORMAL RELATIONSHIPS BEING CREATED. The destruction of cultural values part of Biden plan. IT IS CRIMINAL! Trump says Pedophiles will be terminated! https://nypost.com/2023/11/23/news/children-sexually-abused-in-rape-tents-while-crossing-deadly-darien-gap-report/

Migrant children sexually abused in ‘rape tents’ while crossing deadly Darien Gap: report Doctors Without Borders said in a new report that its members had treated nearly 400 victims of sexual assault in 2023 alone. nypost.com
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 10:29 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Japan is one of the largest holders of U.S securities and on the brink of collapse. You do the math. J6 tapes. Citigroup laying off thousands, Brazil economy neg; Economic failures, etc. Who's ready for a flood of disclosures? THEY WONT BE ABLE TO WALK DOWN THE STREET! https://t.co/SvdqYIPKn5

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 3:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) confronts FBI Director Christopher Wray, demanding answers about alleged 'ghost buses' filled with FBI informants disguised as Trump supporters during the Capitol attack. America wants the truth. Did Wray commit perjury? Higgins calls for his termination.

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

POWERFUL — Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) goes scorched earth on FBI Director Christopher Wray: “Your day is coming, Mr. Wray.” Higgins presses Wray about reports of ‘ghost buses’ filled with ‘FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters and deployed into our capitol on January 6.’ Higgins wants to know the real story behind these ‘ghost buses.’ So does the rest of America. @BeckerNews Did Wray perjure himself? FIRE HIM!

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a hearing, a congressman questions FBI Director Ray about the FBI's involvement in the events leading up to and on January 6th. The congressman asks if the FBI had confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on January 6th, to which Director Ray avoids giving a direct answer. The congressman also mentions evidence suggesting FBI informants were present at the Stop the Steal rally on January 6th. Director Ray denies any FBI involvement in orchestrating violence. The congressman then brings up two buses that arrived at Union Station on January 6th, claiming they were filled with FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters. The chairman interrupts the congressman's questioning, and the congressman expresses frustration at not being allowed to finish his statement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Director Ray, last year, you might recall a survey I Speaker 1: exchanged regarding the FBI's involvement on January 6th and prior. I'm happy to jog your memory to quote, according to the record, I asked you, did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital on January 6th prior to the doors being opened. You responded, I quote, again, I have to be very careful of what I say, to which I said, it should be a no. Can you not tell the American people, no, we did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital on January 6th. A year has passed. We sit here again a year later, We The People still do not have a definitive answer from you or anyone else in the Biden administration Regarding the FBI presence and participation in the months leading up to the November election and in the weeks days prior to January 6 and on January 6 here in D. C. We can't get a straight answer, although we have a tremendous amount of evidence harvested and reviewed over the course of the last year, Which you will see, in September, Stephen D'Artano, formerly in charge of the FBI's field office in Washington, DC, testified to the House Judiciary Committee that he was aware The FBI informants would attend the Stop the Steal rally thrown on January 6. You confirm that the FBI had confidential human sources at the Stop the Steal rally on January 6th here in DC, sir? Speaker 2: Congressman, as we've discussed before, I'm not gonna get into where we have or Have not used confidential human sources, but what I tell you You asked for a definitive Speaker 1: move on. It's my time. You said no. You're not gonna answer. That's cool. We're watching. Speaker 2: Mister chairman, may I answer your question? Speaker 1: The moment will come. This is my time. Earlier this year, an FBI informant who is reported to have, quote, his quote, under oath marched to the U. S. Capitol with fellow Proud Boys members on January 6. He said he was communicating with his FBI handler while people were entering the US capital. Can you confirm that the FBI had that sort of engagement with your own agents embedded within to the crowd on January 6th. Speaker 2: If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6th was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, The answer is emphatically Speaker 1: saying no? No. You're saying no? Okay. Speaker 2: Violence orchestrated by FBI sources or agents? Speaker 1: Are you familiar with with you know what a ghost vehicle is? Director director of the FBI certainly should. You know what a ghost bus is? Speaker 2: A ghost bus? Speaker 1: Ghost bus. Speaker 2: I'm not sure I've used that term before. Speaker 1: Okay. It was pretty common in in law enforcement. It's a vehicle That's used for secret purposes. It's painted over. These 2 buses in the middle here, They were the 1st to arrive at Union Station on January 6, 0500. I have all this evidence. I'm showing you a tip of the iceberg. Speaker 3: Mister chairman. Speaker 1: These 2 buses Mister Jackson completely white. Point of order? Speaker 3: Point of order. Sure. Just run over the time. I understand. But you'll recall that miss Jackson Lee's been allowed to go 2 minutes before. I've been very fair in letting people finish their questioning throughout my tenure as chairman, and I'll continue to be fair on that regard. But I will make a note to the members, if you could stay as close within your time as possible, we have a lot of people that wanna ask these gentlemen questions. So with that, the gentleman yields. But, your your point, I've been very fair in this, mister Ivy, with everybody on this side of the aisle just I don't think I accuse you of being unfair, mister chairman. You're you're making it forward. Okay. Thank you. I now Now recognize May I Speaker 1: close this statement? Speaker 3: No. I think your time is expired, Speaker 1: mister Jones. I note that other members across the aisle have been been granted time and I object to my question being closed. This is a very significant hearing, Mr. Chairman. And these buses are nefarious in nature and were filled with FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters and deployed onto our capital on January 6th. Your day is coming, mister Wright. Speaker 3: Mister, Higgins, I now
Saved - June 20, 2023 at 7:31 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Most of you don’t know

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1965, coronavirus was identified as a pathogen that could be modified for various purposes. The first human manipulation experiment took place in 1966, followed by transatlantic data sharing in 1967. In the 1970s, coronavirus was modified in animals like pigs and dogs. By 1990, it was discovered that coronavirus caused gastrointestinal issues in dogs and pigs, leading to Pfizer filing the first spike protein vaccine patent. The spike protein was not a new problem, as it was known since 1990. Vaccines for coronavirus have been ineffective due to its ability to mutate quickly, as stated in numerous independent scientific publications. In 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus, funded by Anthony Fauci. This suggests that SARS was engineered and not a naturally occurring phenomenon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition. It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold, but what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons, And you heard me correctly, that was 1965, and by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material, so do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, The very first COV experiment in human manipulation, and you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, We had the 1st transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom, and in 1967, the year I was born, we did the 1st human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been fifty 6 years in engineering, and I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties, where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it. Where was that conversation and what should have been that conversation In 1967, that conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s, and in nineteen 'seventy five, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as an infectious agent was an industrial problem for 2 primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's first Spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? 1990, Operation Warp Speed? I'm sorry. Where is the warp and the speed? Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were told that well, the spike protein is a new thing? We just Found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now the problem. We found that out in 1990 and filed the 1st patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus, and who would have thought? Pfizer, clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and at every chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer. Certainly, they wouldn't have had anything to do with this, but oh, yes, they did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with They didn't work. Do you know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus. From 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded the coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective, and since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen. That's following the science. Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work, and there are thousands of publications to that fact, not a few 100, and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally including efforts Of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Barrick and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, all of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this data is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, Infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, Let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious Replication defective means, and that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill seriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year. Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1 point o wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan. Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory In the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, no, I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 2002. And in 2003,
Saved - June 8, 2023 at 7:25 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Rep. Andy Biggs: Biden needs to be impeached, indicted and possibly charged with treason! Who sells state secrets to other countries and laughs about it? Things are getting HOT DEFUND FBI and DOJ!

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the evidence proves that Joe Biden and his family have been selling out America while he was vice president, there are calls for his impeachment. Some Democrats may encourage him to resign, similar to what happened with Nixon. Once he is out of office, he should be indicted for his gross criminal misconduct. The evidence is piling up and if it is consistent with the direction it seems to be headed, impeachment is necessary. Kamala Harris becoming president is not a major concern compared to the seriousness of Biden's alleged actions. The allegations are not only against the White House but also the federal police apparatus for covering up and facilitating attacks against Donald Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If this is all proven and you all come out and you have the evidence that Joe Biden and his family has been selling America out now for a decade, while he was vice president. Where is this going? They impeach Trump. Are you gonna move to impeach Joe Biden? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. He would need to be impeached, and then once he was impeached or hopefully, there'd be some Democrats in the senate that would recognize how grave the situation is and encourage him to resign like, Goldwater did to Nixon. But but once he's out of there, Then he would have to be indicted because this is a gross criminal misconduct. And, and some would even suggest Treasonous, but I'm I I'm holding my my tongue on that just yet, but we have got to find out how extensive this was And, that we have to take action. I mean, the the enough talk talk is talk, but if we produce this evidence that we're starting that's starting to, Pile up by the way. It's there's so much evidence. It's voluminous. It's taking everything, we have with our staff to go through this. But as it piles up, If it is consistent with where the direction it seems to be headed, he should be impeached. And the Democrats cannot defend them with the lies going on, That we we heard earlier this week, they're gonna have to come to grips with this thing. Speaker 0: Yeah. So so then we get Kamala Harris in there. The does that play into your thinking? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, Kamala Harris said, not even the Democrats want her to be president even for a day. The the reality is, this government is kinda being run by the cabinet officials anyway. It's kind of an oligarchy situation. But it cannot that cannot enter into our calculation because what Joe Biden is alleged to have done Is so grave and serious that that we have to face the facts that if you're stuck with Kamala Harris for 6 months to a year. You're stuck with her for 6 months to a year. The reality is, though, the allegations are very, very serious on what the White House did, but they're also serious at what the What the, police apparatus at the federal level did to cover this up and, like you say, Facilitate the the attack on Donald Trump, the weaponization against Donald Trump and actually other
Saved - June 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

John Ratcliffe : according to sources - a foreign national offered a 5 million dollar bribe to Joe Biden for foreign policy direction or consideration; FBI Director Wray refuses to turn this document over to Rep Comer Oversight Committee. DEFUND FBI; HOLD WRAY IN CONTEMPT!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three whistleblowers have accused the FBI and Department of Justice of giving preferential treatment and delaying investigations into the Bidens. FBI Director Christopher Wray's refusal to comply with a congressional oversight subpoena regarding an unclassified document supports these claims. Despite claiming the need to protect sources and methods, there are no national security concerns. Director Wray's lack of trust and previous FBI abuses make it unlikely he will win this battle. If the document is released, it may reveal a foreign national offering a $5 million bribe to Joe Biden for foreign policy considerations. Additionally, there is a need to question former FBI Director James Comey under oath regarding inconsistencies in his testimony and his knowledge of the Hillary Clinton intelligence plan. The House Oversight Committee should not back down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I we checked. It doesn't seem I could be wrong on this. You might know that a previous FBI director has been held in contempt. Can they do it? I mean, where does the showdown go? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, Pete, I think, you know, we heard from not 1, not 2, but 3, Whistleblowers that said that when it comes to investigations, into the Bidens, the FBI and the Department of Justice were giving preferential treatment and were treatment and were slow walking, aspects of the investigation. And, you know, Christopher Wray's, actions as director here with regard to this FD 10/23, really would seem to support the whistleblower's contentions to that. Look, this this legally, director Wray does not have any, legal basis to not comply with this congressional oversight subpoena. This is a this is not a top secret document. It's not a secret document. There are no national security concerns here. This is an un classified document. And what Director Wray is now taking the position is, well DOJ won't let us turn it over because we've got Protect sources and methods. Well, there was a time, Pete, where an FBI director could have gotten away with that. But after the last 6 or 7 years, between Director Comey and Director Wray. A litany of FBI abuses that have primarily gone one way against 1 party. There's no capital, there's no goodwill built up, there's no trust for Director Ray, especially since we heard this before. In 2017, it was Director Ray when When the Nunez FISA memo came out, we wanted to see those FISA applications. He said we'd be jeopardizing sources and methods And that it would cause exceptionally grave damage to our national security. Well, the turns out, the only thing it was protecting was 17 violations of the law by the FBI according to the inspector general. So, you know, this is kinda more of the same, and I I think that director Ray has run out of rope with respect to Republicans. And from a legal standpoint, he's gonna lose this battle. You know, the the FBI is created by Congress, and Congress has a, an oversight role here. There's no legal privilege, there's no Constitutional privilege, and I would expect that, James, Jamie Comer to move forward with this contempt proceeding. Speaker 0: Well and it feels like sources how many times were sources and methods revealed or compromised when, you know, Topics with less with even more gravity were leaked to the press on against Donald Trump. I mean, they've they've hid behind that. Now they're now they're saying he can't present it. Ultimately, Hannity, just a few minutes ago, James Comey, he, Congressman Comer was on saying, he wouldn't even admit to Christopher Wray, that the document existed. So it's digging and digging and digging that leads to even any of this, coming coming to the surface. So you're right. There there is no trust in this process. But if let's say we let's say he is held in contempt or the document does come out, do you think we're able to draw connections here if it is true? Well, Speaker 1: you know, the the the point is, you know, the underlying allegation according to, you know, sources here, Pete, is that A foreign national offered a $5,000,000 bribe to Joe Biden for foreign policy, direction or considerations. And, again, If if we were talking about protecting, sources, or our intelligence collections, intelligence streams as as it related to foreign nationals, You'd expect this document to be marked secret or top secret. Of course. This is an unclassified document. And so, you know, and and, you know, the point about, you know, Jim Comey weighing in on this. Gosh. You know, the guy loves the sound of his voice, when he's giving interviews that are not under oath. But when he's offered the opportunity To testify under oath, you know, like John Durham did to talk about the litany of abuses that took place in the Durham report. He refused, to cooperate. So even though, John Durham did not subpoena Jim Comey, I hope that House Republicans will because Pete, his testimony from March of 2017 and from December of 2018 is entirely inconsistent, with the Durham report. And someone, even if he wants to assert a 5th Amendment right against self incrimination, needs to ask him certain questions, under oath. They need to to to, you know, ask him you know, you asked dozens of questions about the Russiagate and Trump Russia collusion, and you never once mentioned the fact that, you were aware and were briefed of the Hillary Clinton intelligence plan, and the fact that you offered $1,000,000 to Christopher Steele, for the to corroborate the Steele dossier and couldn't do that. So those are the types of questions that I'd like to see Jim Comey, asked under oath. Speaker 0: Yeah. There's no reason for the House Oversight Committee to back down on this at all. Just letting you see the paper is not gonna cut it.
Saved - May 30, 2023 at 1:32 AM

@sxdoc - TRUTH NOW ⭐️⭐️⭐️🗽

Hunter Biden is called out by Russian news media for filming himself in dozens of sex tapes with under age girls while measuring and using crack cocaine. @NoAgendaLara Lara Logan PEDOPHILES EXPOSED; “WE HAVE IT ALL”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden's involvement in scandalous activities with underage girls is deeply disturbing. In one picture, he is seen with four preteens crawling on him, which is difficult to comprehend. This is not the first time he has been involved in such scandals, as he has a history of creating pornographic content with numerous young minors while also using crack cocaine. It is important to note that he is the son of the current American president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hunter Biden's victims, young underage girls. Seen next to Hunter Biden with 4 preteens crawling on him in one picture, it's extremely difficult to find words to describe the next horrific image. This is far from the 1st scandal involving the son of the American president fixated on making porn entertainment with dozens of young easy minors while measuring crack cocaine, ex well, at the same time, is the son of the president of the United States.
View Full Interactive Feed