reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @thehealthb0t
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Dr. Peter McCullough say he took 69 vaccines and can’t be labeled anti-vaxxer, but with today’s knowledge he’d skip them, relying on 12 studies showing a healthy child is healthier with no vaccines.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: “I took 69 vaccines… I can tell you I cannot be labeled as an anti-vaxxer.” LILA ROSE: “But if you knew what you knew today and you had the choice, would you still take those 69 vaccines?” MCCULLOUGH: “No.” LILA ROSE: “None?” MCCULLOUGH: “If I knew what I know now, and I’d rely on… 12 studies, 12 showing a healthy child born today… remains healthier if they take no vaccines whatsoever.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states: He took 69 vaccines, probably more doses than anyone in the room, and cannot be labeled an anti-vaxxer. If given what he knows today and had the choice, he would not take those 69 vaccines. He would rely on the McCullough Foundation report, which now summarizes 12 studies, showing a healthy child born today remains healthier if they take no vaccines whatsoever. He notes that he and his kids were healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I took 69 vaccines. I took 69 different doses, probably far more than you than anybody in this room. I can tell you, I cannot be labeled as an anti vaxxer. But if you knew what you knew today and you had the choice, would you still take those 69 vaccines? No.
None. If I knew what I know now, and I'd rely on the McCullough Foundation report, which now summarizes 12 studies, 12, showing a healthy child born today, and I was healthy. My kids were healthy. A healthy child born today remains healthier if they take no vaccines whatsoever.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Yet, even more proof that doctors were being paid to push vaccines https://t.co/GMcDqHWf12
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions the truth and asks if pediatricians are incentivized by the percentage of vaccinated patients.
Speaker 1 notes that Dr. Paul Thomas has made a good video on the topic, and that many other pediatricians have followed, suggesting a possible need for a better answer from Dr. Hooker.
Speaker 0 states that pediatricians are typically incentivized directly by HMOs, which buy and sell vaccines, making vaccines a big business for HMOs. The incentivization is described as typically anywhere from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient, as long as a certain percentage of the practice is fully vaccinated. Some pediatricians can reportedly make upwards of $1,000,000 or more a year just from these incentives.
Speaker 0 also reports hearing stories of pediatricians firing patients who refuse vaccination, asserting that such firing occurs.
Speaker 1 confirms that the story of firing patients for vaccine refusal is heard repeatedly, and adds that there are also lies told to parents. Examples given include claims that vitamin K at birth is necessary to prevent the baby from bleeding out before leaving the car, and that not receiving the HPV vaccine will result in death from cancer. The speaker says that these stories have been told over and over again by parents.
Speaker 1 then asks how such lying can be allowed to go on, expressing frustration with what they perceive as misinformation being spread to parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is the truth? Because I hear back and forth. I mean, do pediatricians get incentivized with percent vaccination of their
Speaker 1: Yes. Paul doctor Paul Thomas has done a very good video on that, and many other pediatricians have followed. Maybe doctor Hooker could answer better on that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They're typically incentivized directly by HMOs. HMOs buy and sell vaccines, so vaccines are big businesses for HMOs. But the incentivization is usually anywhere from, 200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient as long as their vaccines, a certain percentage of their practice is fully vaccinated. So some pediatricians can make upwards to 1,000,000 or more a year just in those incentives.
I've also heard stories of pediatricians basically firing patients because they won't get vaccinated because that that'll that's correct.
Speaker 1: We hear that story over and over again. And also the lies that the pediatrician tell tell us that our baby will die. If we don't get vitamin k at birth, the baby will bleed out before it gets to the car. And these stories, if you don't get the HPV vaccine, then you will die of cancer. These parents have told us these stories, and they're the same over and over again.
How can they get away with lying like that to us, the parents?
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Zuckerberg warned staff not to take the vaccine, yet continued advocating it for the masses. https://t.co/R3MgIp8m8z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker cautions that we don’t know the long-term side effects of modifying people’s DNA and RNA to directly encode the ability to produce antibodies, and whether that causes other mutations or downstream risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Caution on this because, we just don't know the long term side effects of of basically modifying peoples, the DNA and RNA to, to directly encode in a person's DNA and RNA, basically, the ability to to to produce those antibodies and whether that causes other mutations or other risks down downstream. So
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bombshell Study Finds 1 in 35 Moderna Booster Recipients Suffered Vaxx-Related Heart Damage https://t.co/FXvEJ0Se7p
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: A brand new peer reviewed study from Switzerland reports that a staggering one in thirty five recipients of the Moderna booster shot experienced vaccine associated heart injury. One in thirty five people who took the shot experienced damage to the heart.
The study unpacked the details starting with the hypothesis the researchers were trying to investigate. Going into the study, the researchers, quote, posited that the incidence of vaccine associated heart injury was more prevalent than previously thought following mRNA booster vaccination because of a lack of symptoms or mild symptoms. Essentially, their hypothesis going into the study was that after getting an mRNA booster shot, a lot more people were experiencing vaccine related heart damage than previously thought. And the reason for this was because people's hearts were getting damaged in a way where either there were no symptoms on the surface or the symptoms were mild enough for people to ignore. Meaning that the heart was actually injured, but the recipient of the booster shot was simply unaware.
What these researchers did was that instead of just asking people how they felt after vaccination, they actually went in and they tested their blood. In terms of what they were testing for, quote, the researchers defined heart injury as a sharp increase in high sensitivity cardiac treponin T on the third day after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause. The levels of cardiac treponin had to hit the upper limit of normal, 8.9 nanograms per liter in women and 15.5 nanograms per liter in men. The reason that these researchers decided to use what's known as a treponin test is because it is a very good indicator of whether or not there was damage to the heart. If a person has more of this protein called treponin T in the bloodstream, it means that recently they've experienced damage to the heart.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to a brand new peer reviewed study, came out of the country of Switzerland, a staggering one in thirty five recipients of the Moderna booster shot experienced vaccine associated heart injury. One in thirty five people who took the shot experienced damage to the heart. Now that is obviously a very shocking number. And so let's unpack the details of the study together starting with the hypothesis that the researchers were trying to investigate. Going into the study, the researchers, quote, posited that the incidence of vaccine associated heart injury was more prevalent than previously thought following mRNA booster vaccination because of a lack of symptoms or mild symptoms.
And so, essentially, their hypothesis going into the study was that after getting an mRNA booster shot, a lot more people were experiencing vaccine related heart damage than previously thought. And the reason for this was because people's hearts were getting damaged in a way where either there were no symptoms on the surface or the symptoms were mild enough for people to ignore. Meaning that the heart was actually injured, but the recipient of the booster shot was simply unaware. And so what these researchers did was that instead of just asking people how they felt after vaccination, they actually went in and they tested their blood. And in terms of what they were testing for, quote, the researchers defined heart injury as a sharp increase in high sensitivity cardiac treponin T on the third day after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause.
The levels of cardiac treponin had to hit the upper limit of normal, 8.9 nanograms per liter in women and 15.5 nanograms per liter in men. Now the reason that these researchers decided to use what's known as a treponin test is because it is a very good indicator of whether or not there was damage to the heart. If a person has more of this protein called treponin T in the bloodstream, it means that recently they've experienced damage to the heart.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Dr. Peter McCullough, MD: "The military [DARPA] invented mRNA injections, not Pfizer or Moderna—not Operation Warp Speed." https://t.co/CZixOMHfG9
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"We have a report where a 7 and 9 year old died of a heart attack after the Covid Vaccine…" "Heart attacks were not considered a side effect of the Covid Vaccine…" "Are you saying heart attacks are common in children…" https://t.co/GYhaNUCux9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Skerritt asked when the TGA first became aware that two Australian children, aged seven and nine, died of cardiac arrests directly after receiving a COVID vaccination. Senator responded that there are a number of reports of deaths of people of all ages temporally related to vaccination or not related to vaccination, and that the two specific reports were received in the adverse event notification database. They were unable to obtain sufficient information to assess these particular cases in detail, but the information available indicated they were associated with a heart attack, which is not a known adverse event of any of the COVID vaccines.
Professor Skerritt pressed, asking if cardiac arrest is not an associated adverse event of vaccination. Senator clarified the point, and Professor Skerritt noted that there are two notes for file relating to both incidents obtained via freedom of information, which appear to draw a conclusion that they were a result of the COVID vaccination. Senator replied that this was incorrect, stating that if they were a result of vaccination, an announcement would have been made, and they were not concluded to be associated.
Professor Skerritt then asked, in effect, how often seven- and nine-year-olds die of cardiac arrest. Senator answered that, unfortunately, it is not as uncommon as people might think.
In summary, the discussion centers on whether two pediatric deaths occurring shortly after COVID vaccination were causally linked according to the TGA, the availability and interpretation of data from adverse event reports and FOI notes, and the assertion that a death attributed to vaccination would have prompted an official announcement. The conversation also highlights the point that cardiac arrest in young children, while not common, is not as rare as some might assume.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Professor Skerritt, when did it first come to the attention of the TGA that two Australian children, one aged seven and one aged nine years of age, died of cardiac arrests, directly after receiving a COVID vaccination?
Speaker 1: Senator, we have a number of reports of deaths of people of all ages, including children, temporally related to adverse events from vaccination or not related to adverse events from vaccination, just related in time. So these two reports were received in our database of adverse event notifications. Unfortunately, we were unable to get sufficient information on these particular cases to assess them in detail, but they were associated the information we did have is that they were associated with heart attack, which is not a known adverse event of any of the COVID vaccines.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Did you just say that cardiac arrest is not an associated
Speaker 1: Adverse event of the
Speaker 0: myocarditis which leads to heart attacks, is you do have in front of you two notes for file which relate to both of the incidents which have been obtained on freedom of information, both of which I think do draw a conclusion that they were as a result of the COVID vaccination.
Speaker 1: No, is incorrect, Senator. If they were as a result of vaccination, we would have heard an announcement. They were not concluded to be associated
Speaker 0: So with these are just a seven and a nine year old who just died of how often do seven and nine year olds die of cardiac arrest?
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, it's not as uncommon as you think. Really? So, yes.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Barry Young, a former Ministry of Health employee in New Zealand, examined vaccine batch data and found alarming death rates: Batch 1—711 vaccinated, 152 dead (21.38%); Batch 2—221 vaccinated, 38 dead (17.19%); Batch 3—310 vaccinated, 48 dead (15.48%). He says the expected mortality is 0.75%, and the odds of these outcomes by chance are about 100 billion to 1. He notes multiple batches with 4.5%+ death rates, and claims no urgent investigation followed.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
New Zealand authorities arrested this man for exposing the government’s COVID vaccine data. What he uncovered inside the vaccine batches was horrifying. When Barry Young, a former Ministry of Health employee, examined the data, he was alarmed to find a 21% death rate tied to Batch ID 1. Batch ID 1: Total Vaccinated 711, Death Count 152, 21.38% Dead Batch ID 2 showed similar results, with a 17% death rate — Total Vaccinated 221, Death Count 38, 17.19% Dead Batch ID 3 followed close behind, with a 15% death rate — Total Vaccinated 310, Death Count 48, 15.48% Dead According to Young, New Zealand’s underlying mortality rate should be just 0.75%, meaning the odds of these outcomes occurring by chance are roughly 100 billion to 1. And these weren’t isolated cases. Numerous other batches showed death rates of 4.5% and higher. “So statistically, what we’re saying is that there is no chance that this vaccine is not a killer,” Young concluded. And instead of triggering an urgent investigation, this data triggered something else entirely.
Video Transcript AI Summary
They analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and high mortality rates, placing them on a chart that shows a batch ID, the number vaccinated within that batch, and who was dead. All of the top 10 batches are Pfizer.
Examples:
- Batch number one: 711 vaccinated, 152 died, a 21% mortality rate.
- Batch number eight: 221 vaccinated, 38 dead, a 17% mortality rate.
- Batch number three: 48 dead out of 310 vaccinated, a 15% mortality rate.
- Batch number seventy-one: 11,000 vaccinated, 498 dead, a 4% mortality rate.
They note that the normal mortality rate is 0.75%. The batches are across all age groups and all vaccination centers; it is not one particular batch for one particular age group, but averages across all ages.
The speakers then discuss the meaning of the statistic shown on screen that “the chances of these batches not being a killer are one hundred billion to one.” The statistician explains that, given the underlying mortality rate and the ratio percentage, the top one is almost impossible to occur by chance, so there is no chance that this vaccine is not a killer.
They quantify the scale: you’d have to jab 100,000,000 people to get these statistics. They say there are 2,200,000 kiwis in the system, and we would have had to jab 100,000,000,000 of them to produce results like these.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top 10, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate, and I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID. So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I find out who was dead.
Speaker 1: Wow. Let's have a look.
Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio.
Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10?
Speaker 0: Yes. They are.
Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number one. We've had seven hundred and eleven from batch number one vaccinated. A hundred and fifty two of those died, which makes a twenty one percent
Speaker 0: Percentage. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Death death rate.
Speaker 0: Mortality rate from
Speaker 1: that batch. They are high. Now what's our normal that we would expect? Point seven
Speaker 0: mortality rate, point seven five. Point seven five. Because these batches are against all age groups as well. It's not one particular batch for one particular age group. It's across all ages.
So all the vaccination centers, whoever rocked up on the day, whatever age you were, and it it would average out. It would all average out. So there's not one particular batch that points to one particular age group.
Speaker 1: So looking as if batch number eight, the second one, 221 jab, 38 dead. That's a seventeen percent mortality rate. Yeah. Batch number three here. Yeah.
And we've got forty eight out of 310, so that's a fifteen percent. Yeah. And if we go right down the the in the top 10
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Batch seventy one, eleven thousand vaccinated with batch number seventy one, four hundred and ninety eight dead, and that's a four percent. Now you say down the bottom on the screen, could you just tell us what this is saying? We
Speaker 0: The
Speaker 1: chances of these batches not being a killer are one hundred billion to one. Explain that as a statistician.
Speaker 0: Yep. Well, if you look at the underlying mortality rate and then you look at the ratio percentage here, the top one, the chances of that occur naturally by chance is is almost impossible. It cannot be due to chance. So, statistically, what we're saying is that there is no chance that this vaccine vaccine is not a killer.
Speaker 1: So with a hundred million to one, are you saying you'd have to jab a
Speaker 0: You'd have to jab a 100,000,000 people to get these statistics. Wow. And we've got 2,200,000 on our system.
Speaker 1: 2,200,000 kiwis.
Speaker 0: 2,200,000 kiwis. And we would have had to have jabbed a 100,000,000,000 of them to get these kind of results.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bombshell vax vs. unvax study finally sees the light of day and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” https://t.co/xeg97hjMPx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0/J: The discussion centers on a study with dramatic implications, including claims that publishing such data could be career-ending, and questions about why the data would be so catastrophic.
Speaker 2: The study involved eighteen thousand four hundred sixty eight subjects, of which one thousand nine hundred fifty seven were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis—specifically four point two nine times in the adjusted analysis—and they note there are studies showing a range from three point two six to five point six five.
Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases.
Speaker 2: Atopic diseases are described as a subset of allergic diseases.
Speaker 1: They found an almost six times risk for autoimmune disease.
Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mention there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and their data showed for autoimmunity a six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: This is presented as staggering because autoimmune disorders represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders are also discussed.
Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember?
Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 2: They state the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning, and so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain.
Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated,
Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same patterns as with allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The mathematical formulas require non-zero counts in both groups to compare risk.
Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD.
Speaker 3: These results are described as mind boggling. Conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids: zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. I mean, I'm just curious.
Speaker 1: You see
Speaker 0: What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell.
Speaker 2: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.
Speaker 0: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems, I've looked at a of studies, there's three point two six to five point six five.
Speaker 1: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases.
Speaker 2: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases.
Speaker 1: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease.
Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 0: What kind numbers we talked about? Do you remember?
Speaker 1: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
Speaker 2: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and immune processes in the brain.
Speaker 0: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities, four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated,
Speaker 3: three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
Speaker 2: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk.
Speaker 1: For example, there were two sixty two children who had ADHD in the vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of
Speaker 3: ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
The inventor of the PCR test, Dr Kary Mullis, told us that it must NEVER be used, as it will find whatever you want it to find. He was Fauci's biggest critic. Coincidentally died months before the pandemic. https://t.co/JVMu4DVEmJ
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
U.S. Harvard Professor confirms through an Official Court Affidavit that the Covid Vaccines are Bioweapons of Mass Destruction. That means it was mass murder. https://t.co/4SX0Y9D436
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines.
Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians.
Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development.
Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I.
Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action.
Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible.
Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think you're right. I think that, as I recommended before, Stu, anyone could go in and file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy, to commit murder, and demand that people be arrested and prosecuted. And by the way, I did want to draw to the attention of your audience this press release 2013, where these messenger RNA Franken shots come from, DARPA awards Moderna Therapeutics a grant for up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics. So notice DARPA is the Pentagon. Let me repeat that.
DARPA is the Pentagon. The Pentagon bought, paid for, envisioned these mRNA Frankenshots. And I should also point out Fort Detrick was involved in the development of COVID-nineteen, the offensive biological warfare weapon, at the University of North Carolina BSL-three. So the Pentagon is both sides of the argument here. They're developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines, which is also a weapon.
But the proof is right here.
Speaker 1: So there's not a law, as far as we understand from where we sit, in this country, federal level, state level, municipal level, that protects anybody from deploying a weapon of biowarfare. It doesn't give them any kind of liability shield. There's no immunity to liability in a sense. So wouldn't it be true that this narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is kind of a SIOP?
Speaker 0: That's correct, Stu. The liability that deals with civil liability, payment of damages. Here, we are talking about criminal responsibility. And in my book Resisting Medical Tyranny, I outline the case for why the executives involved in the companies developing these MRNI Frankenshots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder? Yes.
And you saw that report last week from Portugal that upwards of 300,000 Americans now had been murdered as a result of these mRNA Franken shots. So this is quite serious. We cannot tolerate more Americans getting murdered by the Nazis who run these corporations. And if you look at the JAB resolution, clearly what we have here is twofold. A violation of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, exactly what the United States government prosecuted Nazi doctors for at Nuremberg.
And some were executed. Now I'm against the death penalty. So Okay. But that gives you the idea of how severe the situation is. And then second, as the JAB resolution correctly says, this is a Nuremberg crime against humanity.
Since this is so important, let me read for you the definition of a Nuremberg crime against humanity. This was put in the Nuremberg charter by The United States to deal with the Nazi persecution of German Jews. Let me read this here. Yeah, please. Crimes against humanity, murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population.
The American people are being treated here like the Nazis treated German Jews. 300,000 are now dead. When are we going to stop this?
Speaker 1: Yeah. What is the threshold for death exactly? That brings me to another point. So you're talking about the executives at the companies that helped manufacture and then distribute these shots. What about the people inside of our government?
They wouldn't be immune from criminal liability either. They ordered this up in a sense, didn't they?
Speaker 0: That's correct. That would depend on certainly the FDA that has approved these Franken shots. They violated the Nuremberg Code on medical experimentation and have committed a Nuremberg crime against humanity and arguably are responsible for, or could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Again, that requires mens rea on their part and malice of forethought. My book basically dealt with the chief executive officers and the chief scientific officers for the mRNA Franken shots.
But yes, the FDA officials who approved it have accountability as well. I should also point out, Stu, that the FDA itself was involved in the development of COVID-nineteen as an offensive biological warfare weapon at the UNC BSL-three. Let me read to you the contract. And it says, who helped develop this thing, among others? National Center for Toxicological Research Food and Drug Administration.
So the same people, the FDA, the same agency that is approving these Nazi Frankenshots, have been involved in the development of COVID-nineteen, an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that were applied at the University of North Carolina BSL-three student.
Speaker 1: With Ralph Barack's involvement, this is where Ralph Barack comes in. That's correct. Yep, okay. So and then what about moving downward, downhill to the CDC who recommended these, who is adding them to the childhood vaccination schedule? What about the media who ran with the safe and effective narrative?
Fox is still airing commercials. It's time for your next booster, go get your next booster. These people clearly the BBC hitting me all the time saying that I'm a conspiracy theorist, a radical conspiracy theorist on these shots. What about accountability for these people as well?
Speaker 0: I think the CDC also has accountability. The current director, Milensky, Biden appointed, she's from the Harvard Medical School. Harvard Medical School is also involved in the development of the COVID-nineteen at the UNC BSL-three with Ralph Barack along with the FDA. The CDC has been up to its eyeballs in offensive biological warfare weapons going back to the Reagan administration. When the Reagan administration authorized the CDC and American type culture collection to ship 40 shipments of weapons they knew were weapon specific biological warfare agents to Saddam Hussein in Iraq in the hope and expectation that he would weaponize them and use them against Iran.
And then US troops after Gulf War one went in there, blew these, biowarfare labs up, and contaminated themselves. Are there are there
Speaker 1: politicians are there members of our federal government, I'm talking about, you in the House of Representatives or in the United States Senate that are on committees that have the intel about this gain of function, weapon of biowarfare being manufactured, concocted, and whipped up at Fort Detrick University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill that that the FDA was involved? I mean, ostensibly, it would seem to me that there would be people inside of our government that would know and have a forethought that this was going to happen.
Speaker 0: I think, senator Rand Paul, from what I've seen, is the one who has the, best comprehension of what's going on here.
Speaker 1: But did they know beforehand? Did they know that this was going to be developed at the time? I mean, would they have known this? Would they have received intel documents that said, hey, we're going to make a weapon of biowarfare here in The United States. We're gonna ship it offshore, and then we're going to release it on the world population.
Speaker 0: Well, Stu, I've been saying this for many years. If you take a look at a There's an award winning documentary called Anthrax Wars 2009 by Cohen and Nadler. You can get it online. Dealing with the existential dangers presented by these BSL-3s and BSL-4s. And they asked me, because of my expertise, to consult with them.
And at the end of this documentary, I say in the starkest terms possible, this is a catastrophe waiting to happen, unquote. Now that was 2009. So yes, at least my viewpoints on these matters have been out there in the public record. Indeed, in 2001, I was the first to blow the whistle on the fact that Amerithrax came out of a US biological warfare weapons program and laboratory. That was November 3 at Harvard Divinity School, where the Council for Responsible Genetics was holding its convention.
And I was conducting a workshop against biological warfare weapons. I said that to Fox TV November 3. The next day or the Monday after that, I said it to Pacific Radio Network. And then I was on the BBC. The whole world heard me.
And then I was censored off of everywhere after that point. An order was given. And no mainstream news media, Western mainstream news media has ever interviewed me again.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna ask you to speculate here a little bit, and I I know that you like to stick with facts. But what is the what is the game for the people who whipped this up and then released it? What is the game for DARPA, the Pentagon, Ralph Barack, Fauci, EcoHealth Alliance, Peter Dashick? All what what is their what is the end goal here, I guess? What's the end game?
Speaker 0: I think it's population control and reduction, Stu. We if you read the reports now, worldwide there have been excess deaths of about 12,000,000 people. So I think that's the ultimate goal. Remember, that goes back to the infamous national security directive by Henry Kissinger, that it is in the national security interests of The United States for our policy to be population control and reduction. I've never read that that was released.
And then, of course, everyone's making large amounts of money off of this as well.
Speaker 1: As a lawyer, you represented world governments in the International Court of Justice. Why wouldn't any of our I mean, so you're no hack. Why why wouldn't any of our elected representatives in the senate or congress take you seriously when you're warning about this? Why would they write you off like that?
Speaker 0: I believe they've been threatened. I I have contacted I've been in touch with members of Congress about this matter and sued there after they were threatened. For example, one member of Congress was consulting me on one matter. And I raised with him the Ebola pandemic in West Africa, Walter Jones. He was a very powerful member of the House Armed Services Committee.
He was consulting me on another matter, getting my legal opinion. And since he represented Fort Bragg down there where everyone were being deployed, he knew my expertise. I said, Congressman Jones, this West African Ebola pandemic came out of the Kenema BSL-four. It's extremely dangerous. And I think you've got to do something to keep your troops there from being deployed by the Obama administration is propaganda stunt.
It's extremely dangerous. This is biological warfare at work. And Congressman Jones said, we discussed the matter. And then he said, I'll get on it right away. I'll put my top staffer in touch with you, and we'll get on this right away.
Because these were his constituents. What happened? I was completely cut off. Obviously, someone had threatened Congressman Jones. He no longer returned my phone calls, no emails, no messages, no one in his staff either.
Now, who would be able to threaten an extremely powerful member of the House Armed Services Committee to not even act on behalf of his own constituents there? And what was that threat? I don't know. But this personally happened to me, yes. And even after Congressman Jones died, I sent condolences to his office, They didn't even acknowledge receipt of my condolences.
Speaker 1: I think we probably know why. Certainly not every sheriff has been gotten to. Do you think that that's the course of action here is for citizens to go to their sheriff and report that they've been assaulted with a weapon of biowarfare?
Speaker 0: Yes. And also go to your district attorney, state's attorney, county attorney. I'm dealing with the county attorney down there at Colliard County. He he's involved in drafting their health freedom declaration. We're we're making progress
Speaker 1: on this. And then there needs to be an enforcement mechanism in that in that resolution for how we move forward and what we do with the people who are responsible for this deployment and then what we do with the stockpiles of this deployment. I think it's pretty clear at this point. I mean, it needs to be seized. It needs to be incinerated.
And then the people responsible for it need to be put on trial and handed down sentences.
Speaker 0: That's not to excuse the Chinese Communist government. They knew full well they were developing an existentially dangerous, offensive, biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties with HIV DNA genetically engineered into there and that was subjected to nanotechnology to aerosolize it. This stuff will travel up to 30 feet in the air. So I'm not excusing them at all, but they were developing it. Wuhan Institute of Virology
Speaker 1: then is, by definition, a bioweapons lab. Pardon me? The Wuhan Institute of Virology then, by definition, is a bioweapons lab.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. That's China's Fort Detrick's stoop. What happened was, obviously, president there decided that he wanted to play with the big boys, and the big boys had a BSL four like we do, the r four Dietrich or the British at Porton Daunt. And he was going to have his own BSL four and his offense his own, panoply of offensive biological warfare weapons just as bad as anything we have. Right.
Speaker 1: Funded by The US taxpayer, and there's no shortage of that going on around the world either as we have reported on this program ad nauseam. Dozens of these bioweapons labs, just like the Institute of Virology in Wuhan located in Ukraine where we're sending hundreds of billions of dollars and now we're getting reports about the same happening in Taiwan. Interestingly enough, the military industrial complex wants U. S. Boots on the ground there.
Lindsey Graham, the Pfizer whore, the fossil in the DC Beltway there is advocating for US boots on the ground in Taiwan. Seems that they know where all of the bodies are buried, professor Boyle. Thank you so much for coming here. We certainly appreciate it.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bill Gates requested the Danish government to support DTP vaccination for 161 million African children, claiming it saved 30 million lives. The Danish government discovered that vaccinated girls died at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls. https://t.co/AwlZvrAftn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The DTP vaccine—diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis—was the most popular vaccine in the world, but we banned it in this country because it was causing injuries, brain injuries, severe brain injuries, or death to one in every three hundred children. It was used in the eighties, and there was extensive litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the vaccine act, which then gave them immunity from liability. In Europe, they don’t use it. In America, they don’t use it. Yet we give it to 161,000,000 African children a year.
Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved thirty million lives. The Danish government requested data to back that claim, but he wasn’t able to provide it.
So they went to Africa and conducted their own studies, examining thirty years of DTP data, and what they found shocked them all. They found that girls who got the DTP were dying at ten times the rate of unvaccinated girls, and they were dying from problems that nobody had ever associated with the vaccine. They were dying of diphtheria or tetanus or pertussis?—and also anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. Nobody noticed for thirty years that it was the vaccinated girls who were dying, and it was not from diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis.
The vaccine had protected them against those diseases, but it had also ruined their immune systems. As a result, these girls were unable to defend themselves against other diseases that, in children with a hardy immune system, would have been fought off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most popular vaccine in the world is the DTP vaccine, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. We we banned it. We got rid of it in this country because it was causing injuries, brain injuries, severe brain injuries, or death to one in every three hundred children. We used it in the eighties, and that's why there was all this litigation against vaccine companies that precipitated the passage of the vaccine act that then gave them immunity from liability. But in Europe, they don't use it.
In America, they don't use it. But we give it to a 161,000,000 African children a year. So Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support that program and said it saved thirty million lives. The Danish government said, show us the data. He wasn't able to.
So they went to Africa and did their own studies, and they looked at thirty years of DTP data, and what they found shocked them all. They found that girls who got the DTP were dying at 10 times the rate of unvaccinated girls, and but they were dying things that nobody had ever associated with the vaccine. They were dying of dip there of of anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, and pneumonia. And nobody noticed for thirty years that it was the vaccinated girls and not the unvaccinated girls who were dying. And what had happened is these girls were not dying of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis.
The vaccine had protected them against those, but it had also ruined their immune systems. And they were unable to defend themselves against other just minor diseases that were that other kids who had a hardy immune systems were able to fend off.
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke with a hospital coder who goes by “Zoe.” She describes horrific cases after the COVID injections: rapid, severe seizures; encephalitis and encephalopathy; insane blood clots requiring multiple stents; multi‑organ failure and sepsis; overnight spinal gangrene and even leg amputation. Doctors were baffled and would not connect these injuries to the vaccine, labeling them as strokes, heart attacks, or clots without linking to vaccination.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly, before they rolled out the mRNA injections...[For] days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it, and eventually they...kinda had to be put down." A hospital medical coder who goes only by "Zoe" for this interview describes for Children's Health Defense the horrors she witnessed following the rollout of the COVID injections. Among the unthinkable, and deadly, illnesses were things like encephalitis, gangrene of the spine, blood clots, strokes, and multiple system organ failure. "I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly, before they rolled out the mRNA injections...It was insane, I've never seen anything like that. The worst of them, they called it sepsis, but it was like instant multi-organ failure. Like, within hours patients would die of liver, lung, kidney... failure [all at once]..." Zoe tells CHD. She adds that "Some of the records...[from the] emergency crew that found them [the injection victims], it's like their body tried to reject everything and [in] some of these cases their family would be there 30 minutes before, and then within an hour they're dead." Zoe notes that "there were patients coming in with seizures like I'd never seen before," and that hospital staff "couldn't control some of them." The coder adds, "[For] days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it, and eventually they...kinda had to be put down." "They called it encephalitis, or encephalopathy, and then later on, even the coding organization...[called it] COVID-19-associated encephalitis," Zoe says. "[T]he clots were insane," the coder notes. "Never seen clots like that before—even the interventional radiologists that were going in with...scopes where they can do heart interventions and do stents [a stent is a tube usually constructed of a metallic alloy or a polymer] in carotid artery (if you have a stroke going to your brain), normally it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting...multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before." Zoe goes on to say that "There were people that were hiking in their 20s that were totally healthy, that had been running marathons, that suddenly needed a leg amputated because they had a massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved." "There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I'd never seen before," the coder adds. "And, you know, you can't amputate the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally they cut out tissue that's dying like that so it prevents further infection and they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was...basically replace that part of [their] spine with an implant, that's the best they could do... It was really intense." As for doctors' responses to these horrors, Zoe says, "[they] were baffled, they weren't connecting the dots." However, she adds that "Knowing what the potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we 100% had all the things I just described." Despite that knowledge, "doctors would never tell [patients] that. They would just say, 'It's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot.' And then they would never connect the two."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there?
Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. It was insane. Patient the worst of them were the ones called it sepsis, but it was, like, instant multi organ failure. Like, within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. It was like their some of the records, the emergency crew that found them, it's like their body tried to reject everything. And and some of these cases, like, their family would be there thirty minutes before, and then within an hour, they're dead. And then there were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. We couldn't control some of them.
Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. And eventually, they kind of had to put down. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. And then later on, even the coding information organization, AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. There were blood clots, strokes.
The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Even the interventional radiologist that were going in with, you know, they have angiopathies and, you know, different scopes where they can do, like, heart interventions and put stents in, like a carotid artery if you have a stroke going to your brain. They normally, it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting, you know, multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they, you know, they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before.
There were people in their twenties that had been hiking that were totally healthy, had been running marathons that suddenly needed an a leg amputated because they had massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved. So that happened. There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I've never seen before. And you can't amputate, you know, the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally, cut out tissue that's dying like that, so it prevents further infection.
And they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was, you know, do a basically replace the that part of your spine with an implant. That's the best they could do. Yeah. It was really intense.
And I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started to about the flu shot way back in 2004. But with the pressure to get the COVID nineteen shot, I started looking into what it could do, and I I knew I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And when I started looking into the experts that were saying, well, this is what this potential vaccine could do. This is what the research says.
I was looking at the vaccine trials and what's happening to those patients and the Guill Barre that was happening and the strokes that were happening. And so I kind of knew to look for that when the vaccine came out. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. But to me, knowing what the potential causes or potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we a hundred percent had all the things that I just described.
But doctors would never tell you that. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two.
Speaker 0: Is there anything that would make you take a vaccination of any kind ever again?
Speaker 1: They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there?
Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. It was insane. I've never seen anything like that. Patient the worst of them were the ones called it sepsis, but it was, like, instant multi organ failure.
Like, within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. It was like their some of the records, the emergency crew that found them, it's like their body tried to reject everything. And and some of these cases, like, their family would be there thirty minutes before, and then within an hour, they're dead. And then there were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. We couldn't control some of them.
Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. And eventually, they kind of had to put down. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. And then later on, even the coding information organization, AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. There were blood clots, strokes.
The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Even the interventional radiologist that were going in with, you know, they have angiopathies and, you know, different scopes where they can do, like, heart interventions and put stents in, like, a carotid artery if you have a stroke going to your brain. They normally, it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting, you know, multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they, you know, they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before.
There were people in their twenties that had been hiking that were totally healthy, had been running marathons that suddenly needed an a leg amputated because they had massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved. So that happened. There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I've never seen before. And you can't amputate, you know, the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally, cut out tissue that's dying like that, so it prevents further infection.
And they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was, you know, do a basically replace the that part of your spine with an implant. That's the best they could do. Yeah. It was really intense.
And I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started to about the flu shot way back in 2004. But with the pressure to get the COVID nineteen shot, I started looking into what it could do, and I I knew I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And when I started looking into the experts that were saying, well, this is what this potential vaccine could do. This is what the research says.
I was looking at the vaccine trials and what's happening to those patients and the Guill Barre that was happening and the strokes that were happening. And so I kind of knew to look for that when the vaccine came out. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. But to me, knowing what the potential causes or potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we a hundred percent had all the things that I just described.
But doctors would never tell you that. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two.
Speaker 0: Is there anything that would make you take a vaccination of any kind ever again?
Speaker 1: They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Tiffany Dover was one of the first people in the world to take a COVID mRNA jab It was effective in another way. https://t.co/KoLbYG8N1D
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tiffany Doper identifies herself as a manager in the Coronary Care Unit (CCU). In describing her position and the responsibilities tied to her role, she notes that her team operates within the COVID unit. Because of this placement, she states that her team will be among the first groups to have access to the vaccine. This point underscores the prioritization she is describing for her team, highlighting that their frontline status in the COVID unit translates into earlier scheduling or eligibility for vaccination relative to other staff cohorts.
In addition to outlining the vaccine prioritization for her team, Tiffany emphasizes the clinical environment in which they work. By specifying that she and her colleagues are in the COVID unit, she conveys the heightened exposure risk and the heightened need for protection that accompanies their daily duties. The claim about early vaccine access is presented as a direct consequence of their unit’s involvement with COVID patient care, rather than as a general or universal policy for all hospital staff.
An important, personal moment emerges in her statement when she reveals that she is feeling very dizzy at the moment. This immediate personal health note interrupts the professional context, signaling that she is experiencing a physical symptom that could affect her ability to communicate or perform her duties at that moment. The dizziness is described in a straightforward, self-reported manner, without further elaboration about potential causes, tests, or subsequent steps. The combination of professional duty and personal condition juxtaposes the demanding environment of the CCU COVID unit with the personal health realities that can accompany healthcare workers in high-stress settings.
Taken together, the transcript conveys two core points: first, the vaccine access expectation for Tiffany Doper’s team due to their assignment to the COVID unit and the associated frontline status; second, Tiffany’s immediate personal experience of dizziness during the moment of discussion. These elements together reflect both operational priorities within a high-risk clinical area and a momentary health concern affecting the speaker.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Name is Tiffany Doper, and I am the manager in CCU. For my team, we are in the COVID unit. So therefore, you know, my team will be getting first chances to get the vaccine. And I know that it's really I'm sorry. Feeling really dizzy.
I'm sorry.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Remember that virus that was only dɛadly when the cameras were on? https://t.co/Wgw9X0Ni3N
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the result of this second round has contradicted all polls and where all projections were predicting. Tonight, I won and we won.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bien, vous regardez Tout le monde est prêt Bien, mesdames, mesdames et messieurs, le résultat de ce second tour a démenti tous les sondages et d'où jouaient tous les pronostics. Ce soir, j'ai gagné et nous avons gagné.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Zuckerberg warned staff not to take the vaccine, yet continued advocating it for the masses. https://t.co/4hjzn9D65u
Video Transcript AI Summary
Caution about long-term side effects of modifying people’s DNA and RNA to directly encode the ability to produce antibodies, and whether this could cause other mutations or downstream risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Caution on this because, we just don't know the long term side effects of of basically modifying peoples, the DNA and RNA to, to directly encode in a person's DNA and RNA, basically, the ability to to to produce those antibodies and whether that causes other mutations or other risks down downstream. So
reSee.it AI Summary
I call for a Special Counsel to investigate Dr. Fauci for mass negligent homicide, fraudulent concealment of COVID origins, and promoting dangerous vaccines—crimes he wanted pardoned and knew he committed.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Dr Peter McCullough, MD: "A Special Counsel Has To Be Assigned To Investigate Dr Fauci For Mass Negligent Homicide." "Crimes he wanted pardon for. Crimes he knew he committed. Fraudulent concealment of COVID origins. Mass negligent homicide and promoting dangerous vaccines." https://t.co/csoljD2Jtt
reSee.it AI Summary
If I could go back, I would not vaccinate my newborns. I believe adverse events from vaccines are more common than we imagine, including allergies. I think an adjuvant may have caused my wheat allergy, and my sons have allergies likely from a childhood vaccine adjuvant. With what I’ve learned, I would skip vaccines for newborns. I’m not saying some are not beneficial, but I cannot trust safety testing.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bret Weinstein says that if he could go back, he would not vaccinate his newborn children. “I believe the adverse events from regular old vaccines are far more common than we imagine, including things like allergies.” “I believe that my allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused my immune system to react to something normal in my gut in a way that I will never be free from.” “One of my sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to get in his way.” “The other has an allergy to dairy… What I now think is that he developed an allergy very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine.” “Given all of that education that I have now painfully received, if I had it to do all over again, I would not end up giving any vaccines to my newborn children.” “I’m not saying it’s impossible that any of them are more beneficial than they are harmful, but I now know that I cannot trust the safety testing.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses a belief that adverse events from regular vaccines occur more frequently than people imagine, including things like allergies. They state that their own allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they feel they will never recover. They also mention that one of their sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to disrupt daily life, while another son has a dairy allergy that the speaker attributes to an allergy to mother's milk, which the speaker says they did not understand at the time but observed as the baby spit up regularly after breastfeeding. The speaker describes this dairy-related issue as a huge waste of a precious resource and questions whether evolution could be blamed for it, noting the expectation that ancestors would be starving and not surrender such nutrients if food were abundant.
The speaker elaborates on their current interpretation by suggesting that the dairy allergy in their child was developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. They use this line of reasoning to illustrate a broader point about their view of vaccines and safety testing. The long, winding explanation leads to the central claim: given the education they have received, if they could do everything again, they would choose not to give any vaccines to their newborn children. They make it clear that they are not asserting that it is impossible that some vaccines are more beneficial than harmful, but they state that they now know they cannot trust the safety testing.
In the closing, the speaker asserts that even if there were indications that a vaccine might be net beneficial, they would be compelled to wonder what else they do not know. The overall message emphasizes a deep skepticism about safety testing and a belief that current knowledge is insufficient to justify vaccinating newborns, as presented by Speaker 0.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe, a, the adverse events from regular old vaccines are far more common than we imagine, including things like allergies. I believe that my allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused my immune system to react to something normal in my gut in a way that I will never be free from. My kids, one of my sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to get in his way, and the other has an allergy to dairy that I think goes back to, an allergy to mother's milk, which at the time I did not understand he had, but he spit up so regularly after breastfeeding, it always perplexed me. This is a huge waste of a precious resource. Seems like evolution screwed up.
That doesn't make sense that it would waste all of this mother's milk in this way because our ancestors were starving. Right? It's one thing if the mother has plenty to eat. It's another thing if the mother is resource stressed, you wouldn't wanna surrender all of that nutrient. So what I now think is that he developed an allergy very early, probably from an adjuvant in a in childhood vaccine.
But in any case, this is all a long winded way of saying the following thing. Given all of that education that I have now painfully received, if I had it to do all over again, I would not end up giving any vaccines to my newborn children. I'm not saying it's impossible that any of them are more beneficial than they are harmful, but I now know that I cannot trust the safety testing. And so even if I saw an indication that something was net beneficial, I would have to wonder what is it that I don't know.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV and Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." "Vaccine research has created the worst plagues in our history." https://t.co/lYyTBEa3yi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 advocates ending all gain-of-function research and aims to sign a treaty to cease such work globally. The goal is to gather nations to agree to end gain-of-function research, asserting it is a disaster and has yielded no benefits. The speaker claims gain-of-function research has produced a range of diseases, listing Lyme disease, COVID, and many others, with RSV cited as now one of the biggest killers of children and described as having originated from a vaccine lab. The speaker asserts a broad list of diseases can be traced back to vaccine research, and suggests there is strong evidence that even the Spanish flu came from facts related to vaccines and vaccine research. They claim medical research and vaccine research have, in their view, created some of the worst plagues in history.
The speaker contends that most readers of the River (implied reference) would be convinced that HIV also came from a vaccine program, noting there is plenty of evidence suggesting that, though they stop short of asserting certainty. They state there is very little evidence that gain-of-function has provided any marginal benefits and claim it has caused horrible outcomes—“Gittahashbees” (a mispronunciation or distorted term) is used to describe the risks as simply not worth it.
Additionally, the speaker says they will end gain-of-function globally, attempting to sign a treaty to reinstate the Geneva Convention and the biological weapons charter signed in 1973, and to make it verifiable with other nations agreeing to it. The overall message is a call to terminate gain-of-function research, establish an enforceable international treaty, and curb or eliminate the associated risks by aligning with historic international biological norms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Need. I will end all gain of function research. I will I will sign a treaty on the end gain of function research for you know, to get all the nations and gain of function research. It's just a disaster. It's it's given us no benefits.
It's given us, you know, everything from Lyme disease to COVID and many, many other diseases that RSV, which is now the one of the biggest killers of children, came out of, you know, a a vaccine lab. You know? So and and we can go down the whole list of diseases that you know, down to and and there's good evidence that even Spanish flu came from facts a vaccine and vaccine research. And, you know, we don't know and we'll probably never know, but they you know, they're very, very strong articles suggesting that now. Oh, the, you know, the medical research on these diseases has and vaccine research has actually created, some of the worst plagues in our history.
It's anybody who reads the river, will come away pretty much convinced that HIV also came from, you know, a vaccine program. And there's plenty of plenty of evidence of that as well. I'm not saying it did because we can't say, but I'm saying there's strong evidence that it did. And there's there's very, very little evidence that gain of function has given us even marginal benefits, and it's given us horrible, horrible Gittahashbees. The risks are simply not worth it.
Oh, I will end it. I will try to end it globally. You know, try to sign a treaty of the kind to to basically reinstate the Geneva Convention and the and the biological weapons charter that we signed in 1973 and make it verifiable and get other nations to agree on it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read unsealed DOJ documents from the Epstein trove claiming 2011 emails outline a playbook to monetize future pandemics via offshore arms and donor advised funds linked to Gates initiatives, urging JPMorgan's top asset manager to create offshore structures to profit under charity rhetoric.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
MORE BILL GATES PANDEMIC PLANS EPSTEIN FILES EXPOSE GATES JPMORGAN PLAN TO TURN PANDEMICS INTO PROFIT MACHINES YEARS BEFORE COVID Unsealed DOJ documents from the Epstein trove reportedly include 2011 emails laying out a sophisticated playbook for monetizing future pandemics through hidden financial structures. Epstein personally urged JPMorgan's elite asset management boss to create offshore arms and donor advised funds tied to Bill Gates initiatives explicitly designed to rake in cash under the guise of charity.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read Bret Weinstein’s analysis of 80 Ivermectin court cases: in 40 allowed, 38 survived; in 40 banned, 38 died. Using standard stats, the chance that Ivermectin had no impact is about 1 in 20 quadrillion. Yet we were denied this treatment. A major medical tragedy.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Bret Weinstein’s analysis of the 80 Ivermectin court cases reveals a mind blowing statistic. In the 40 cases where Ivermectin was permitted, 38 survived. In the 40 cases where it was not, 38 died. Using a standard statistical formula, the chances that Ivermectin had no impact are roughly 1 in 20 quadrillion. Yet, we were denied this treatment. This is one of the biggest medical tragedies in modern history!
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Pierre Corre's book The War on Ivermectin, an accidental natural experiment is described. A natural experiment is explained as a situation where nature creates varying conditions that allow analysis without controlled experimentation. The book reports 80 court cases in which families sued hospitals to force ivermectin treatment for desperately ill relatives. In 40 cases, courts granted the request and ivermectin was administered; in the other 40, courts refused and no ivermectin was given. Among the cases where ivermectin was given, 38 patients survived and 2 died. Among the cases where ivermectin was not given, 2 patients survived and 38 died.
The presenter notes that he cannot vouch for the data itself since it is not published in a scientific paper and the court cases cannot be independently checked, but presumes the data is accurate and states he knows Pierre well and believes he didn’t fabricate it. A chi-squared calculation, validated by two different AIs, yields a p-value of 5.03 × 10^-15, indicating an extraordinarily high level of statistical significance. The presenter emphasizes that “the chances of a result that strong if ivermectin does not work are something like the chances of you guessing a random 15 digit number on the first try,” calling the result “through the roof.”
It is noted that CNN framed the topic as a veterinary medicine issue, which the presenter finds ironic. The broader point is that the ivermectin story, and repurposed drug use more generally, is an important puzzle piece: if repurposed drugs had been allowed to be used through the normal medical process—where doctors evaluate patients, consider symptoms, and pool information with other doctors—COVID could have been an entirely manageable disease for all but the most compromised individuals. The presenter concludes that there was no important pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you read Pierre Corre's book, The War on Ivermectin? No. Okay. There's something reported in this book that it really stops you in your tracks. It is an accidental natural experiment.
K? So a natural experiment is something in science where maybe you happen on an archipelago in which you have a bunch of different islands that have different conditions, and you can go to each island and measure the, you know, whatever parameter it is because nature has given you an experiment that you can analyze. You don't have to build islands. Right? In this case, what Pierre reports is that there were 80 court cases in which a family sued a hospital that was refusing to give ivermectin to a desperately sick family member, and they wanted the courts to intervene and force the hospitals to administer ivermectin.
80 cases. In 40 of those cases, the courts granted the family's request and ivermectin was administered. In 40 cases, they refused to intervene and no ivermectin was given. In thirty eight of the cases where ivermectin was given, the patient survived. In two, the patient died anyway.
In thirty eight of the cases where no ivermectin was given, the patient died, and in two, the patient survived. Wow. K? Now I find this like, this is incredibly I cannot vouch for the data itself. I because it's not published in a scientific paper, I can't go look at the methods.
I can't go find the court cases. But assuming that the data is accurately reported, and I know Pierre well, he he didn't make it up. So assuming that the data is accurate, the level of statistical significance on that accidental study is absolutely astronomical. Right? I had Heather run a a chi squared calculation, and the p value, I checked it also with two different AIs.
The p value comes out to be five point o three times 10 to the negative 15. Right? So what that means is that the chances of a result that strong if ivermectin does not work are something like the chances of you guessing a random 15 digit number on the first try. Wow. I mean, it's through the roof.
Right? This is a level of statistical significance we essentially never see. And CNN turned it into a veterinary medicine. Right. It turned you green.
Hilarious. Right. So my point here is a couple fold. One, the ivermectin story and the repurposed drug story more generally is a very important puzzle piece, because if repurposed drugs had been allowed to be used, if doctors had been allowed to go through the normal process of medicine that doctors go through, where they look at a patient who's ill, they see what their symptoms are, they try to figure out what might work for them, they talk to other doctors, they pool their information. If that process had been allowed to unfold, COVID is an entirely manageable disease in all but the most compromised people.
Right? There was no important pandemic.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
This is the lab work of someone eating red meat, real butter, steak, ribeye and eggs - no wonder they don't want you to eat this way: https://t.co/moR7gyLutQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker describes "a lab work of someone eating red meat, real butter, steak, rib eye, the whole entire full fat dairy. Full fat dairy. The yolk and everything. I'm eating it. Explain yourself."
- They add, "I'm sorry. But whenever Cheerios are on the cardiac friendly diet and you're backing that, respectfully, don't talk to me."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a lab work of someone eating red meat, real butter, steak, rib eye, the whole entire full fat dairy. Full fat dairy. The yolk and everything. I'm eating it. Explain yourself.
I'm sorry. But whenever Cheerios are on the cardiac friendly diet and you're backing that, respectfully, don't talk to me.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Medical officer reveals Covid Vaccine related HEART ISSUES skyrocketing in active duty Naval officers. Myocarditis rises 151% Pulmonary heart disease up 62% Ischemic heart disease up 69% Heart Failure increased a whopping 973% https://t.co/Rg0KDKvpME
Video Transcript AI Summary
In July, Under Secretary Cisneros acknowledged that the DMET data, the database, was functioning properly, and also acknowledged a specific finding: myocarditis rising by 151 percent. Building on that, I conducted an identical examination today, applying the same methodological approach: using a five-year average for context and comparison, and restricting the analysis to active duty personnel who are fixed-wing pilots and helicopter pilots. The purpose of this approach is to establish a consistent baseline and to focus on the subgroup defined by flight duties and active-duty status.
The results from this targeted analysis show several notable figures across different cardiovascular conditions. Hypertensive disease is observed at 36 percent. Ischemic heart disease is observed at 69 percent. Pulmonary heart disease is observed at 62 percent. Heart failure is observed at 973 percent. Other forms of heart disease are observed at 63 percent. Cardiomyopathy is observed at 152 percent.
These percentages reflect the comparison of the five-year average to the 2022 figures, restricted to fixed-wing pilots and helicopter pilots who are on active duty. The substantially elevated figure for heart failure, at 973 percent, stands out among the listed categories, while ischemic heart disease at 69 percent and cardiomyopathy at 152 percent also present relatively high values within this cohort. The hypertensive disease category at 36 percent and the pulmonary heart disease category at 62 percent indicate additional areas of notable prevalence within the same population subgroup. The “other forms of heart disease” category at 63 percent contributes to the overall picture of cardiovascular condition distribution in this specific active-duty, flight-crew population.
In summary, the today-conducted, five-year-average-based comparison, limited to active-duty fixed-wing and helicopter pilots, yields the following prevalence levels for selected cardiovascular conditions relative to 2022: hypertensive disease 36 percent; ischemic heart disease 69 percent; pulmonary heart disease 62 percent; heart failure 973 percent; other forms of heart disease 63 percent; and cardiomyopathy 152 percent. These findings align with the prior acknowledgment that myocarditis had risen significantly (151 percent) and extend the pattern of elevated cardiovascular indicators within the same targeted group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in July, under secretary Cisneros acknowledged the DMET data, the database working properly, and also acknowledged things such as myocarditis rising a hundred fifty one percent. So what I did, I went in today. I'm doing the same thing, five year average. However, I'm comparing it to 2022, and I only am using fixed wing pilots and helicopter pilots, active duty. So we get hypertensive disease, thirty six percent, ischemic heart disease, sixty nine percent, pulmonary heart disease, sixty two percent, heart failure, nine hundred and seventy three percent, Other forms of heart disease, sixty three percent.
Cardiomyopathy, one hundred and fifty two percent.
reSee.it AI Summary
I know root canals are a conspiracy that’s true. There’s a Netflix documentary you can’t watch in the U.S. without a VPN. 30 million-plus people get root canals every year, and a lot of them get sick.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"What's a conspiracy theory you 100% know is true?" "Root canals." "There's this Netflix documentary... You can't even watch it in the United States. You have to turn on a VPN because it's banned." "There's 30 million plus people a year getting root canals, and a lot of them are getting sick."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts if asked for a conspiracy theory they are certain about, their answer is root canals. They reference a YouTube video that was formerly a Netflix documentary called The Root Cause, which they say discussed a large psyop by the dental industry and big pharma aimed at damaging people's health through root canals. They claim the documentary is banned and cannot be watched in the United States; viewers must use a VPN to access it, alleging that it is prohibited by the American Dental Association, which they claim is in bed with big pharma. The speaker contends that dentists cannot discuss the topic because they would lose their licenses.
The core claim is that root canals are filled with hazardous substances, specifically mercury and formaldehyde, along with “all sorts of chemicals” that disrupt meridian lines. They state that these root canals disrupt the ability to think properly. The speaker cites a figure of “thirty million plus people a year” receiving root canals and asserts that many of them become sick as a result, linking a range of health issues to root canals. They mention ADHD, cancer, memory loss, and heart failure as possible outcomes connected to root canals, implying a broad set of illnesses can be tied back and connected to the procedure.
Throughout, the speaker presents the narrative as a controlled suppression of information by industry and regulatory bodies, framing the root canal practice as a systemic health hazard rather than a standard dental procedure. The emphasis is on alleging a deliberate cover-up and a correlation (or causation) between root canal treatments and significant health problems, with the suggestion that mainstream medical and dental authorities are complicit in concealing the alleged risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's a conspiracy theory you 100% know is true? Root canals. There's this YouTube video, which before was a documentary on Netflix before it got pulled two weeks, known as The Root Cause. The Root Cause discusses the big psyop by dental industry and by big pharma to fuck people's health up through root canals. You can't even watch it in The United States.
You have to turn on a VPN because it's banned by the American Dental Association, which is in bed with big pharma. Dentists can't say it because they'll lose their license. Root canals filled with mercury, formaldehyde, and all sorts of chemicals that disrupt your meridian lines. They disrupt the ability to actually think properly. There's thirty million plus people a year getting root canals, and a lot of them are getting sick, whether it's the idea of ADHD, cancer, losing your memory, having heart failure, everything can be tied back and connected to root
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Japan's most senior oncologist prof. Fukushima: "Genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable. The introduction of transgenes into the human body is gene therapy. How can this be considered acceptable for creating vaccines?" https://t.co/DBJcFVIG3V
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable and defines the introduction of transgenes into the human body as gene therapy, questioning how this can be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines. They assert that encapsulating messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administering it leads to off-target effects, with the effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. They emphasize that the biggest problem is going to the bone marrow and the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ.
Regarding spike proteins, the speaker states that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year, which they interpret as evidence that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. They contend that there is no way for a year-old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected.
Personal choices are also mentioned: they did not choose to get vaccinated because they think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. They have not even opted for the flu shot because they consider it an unwise choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable. The introduction of transgenes into the human body is gene therapy. How can this be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines? If you encapsulate messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administer it, you only get off target effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. The biggest problem is going to the bone marrow, the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ.
The fact that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year makes it obvious that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. There is no way for a year old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected. I didn't choose to get vaccinated because I think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. I haven't even opted for the flu shot because I consider it an unwise choice.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"I didn't see a single patient die of COVID." - Frontline Nurse Nicole Sirotek https://t.co/KwAu8F1RzN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance.
When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States.
As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me.
Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury.
I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States.
As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Although I am not a doctor, I'm just a nurse. But what we saw in these front lines, we knew what was happening. And when we asked for the ibuprofen, they said, no. It was contraindicated. When we asked, like, why aren't we giving them steroids?
Oh, well, it's not. We're just following orders. Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths that has occurred in these hospitals. I didn't see a single patient died of COVID. I've seen a substantial number of patients die of negligence and medical malfeasance.
When I was on the front lines of New York, I'm unfortunately known globally viral as the nurse that was in the break room sobbing, saying that they were murdering my patients. The pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice, I guess you can say, on the minorities, on the disadvantaged, on the marginalized populations that we know that we had no advocates for, because the very agencies that should have been protecting them were closed because we were sheltering in place. Now, while I was there and I saw that the pharmaceutical companies were rolling out remdesivir onto the patients, I tried to get ahold of the IRBs, I tried to get ahold of my appropriate chain of command, I tried CMS, I tried Department of Health, And they rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients for which we all saw it was killing the patients. And now, it's the FDA approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in The United States. As nurses, we've collected a statistical or descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors, because for more they do quantitative data, we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research.
And so we've collected the data from all of these patients across the country from which we have been helping patients because I formed the organization American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. And all of this data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they're rolling it out on children as well and into the nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention when as doctor Pierre Corre and doctor Merrick have already demonstrated that there are cost effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across our country. And we haven't even touched on the vaccines for which all of our expert panels have already very well described that situation, so I won't touch on that since many of them are by far superior to me than even I could ever hope to be. But I can tell you that two days ago, I flew out my first 10 year old with a heart attack, and I had to fight the doctor in the ER because he's like, 10 year olds don't have heart attacks.
And I argued back and forth for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG to find out that he was had almost a complete STEMI, is ST elevated myocardial infarction, for which you could see it lit up on the 12 lead EKG. And he's like, well, that's not possible. And I'm like, well, was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible. At any given time, people are getting ahold of me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate because as you've seen, is victim shaming that it oh, it's anxiety.
Oh, it's this. But in actuality, if they put down that it was a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic, they actually won't get reimbursed, so it gets labeled as anxiety, or neuropathy, or Guillain Barre syndrome, when in actuality, it's very realistically a vaccine injury. Now, I'm not even though I founded American Front Line Nurses, I've traveled extensively to South America, India, and South Africa working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus, and working with early intervention. And nowhere in those countries, in developing nations, do I see these issues that we see here in The United States. It's actually, I'm a very proud American citizen.
I come from a family of immigrants, and my mother told me that The United States is the best country in the world, though granted I am biased being an American. And our level of health care has been deteriorated to substandard third world nation health care, whereas I tell people you are better off in South America in a field hospital than you are in level one trauma designer hospitals in The United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from our American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, patients not getting water. How come a patient hasn't been fed in nine days? Why do I need to get a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn't intubated and who's literally telling you they would like food?
Oh, well, can't take your BiPAP mask off. Well, that's what us nurses are for. We're going to help you take that off and help you eat, but we're not allowed to. If they're on a ventilator, they're not getting basic standards of care. I've had patients that haven't been bathed, haven't been fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned.
And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital, this is a concentration camp. Absolutely it is. Nowhere in The United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours at a time with no human contact. It's not even allowed in the prisons. You are not allowed to isolate a prisoner for beyond a certain extensive amount of time because it is horrible for their mental health and is considered inhumane.
However, in these hospitals now, we're allowed to isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye to them over an iPhone, as Jennifer Bridges has just demonstrated to us, or she has to shuttle people in to see. And personally, I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rights to their family. And so thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to come and represent our patients, because as you can see, we're not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. So thank you so much for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
The FDA has been the victim of a rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry. In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove that actually only 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma. https://t.co/BstEsVSquY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses several intertwined points about the FDA's funding, information sources, and a personal health journey. It states that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, and that this information was released only after a rumor claimed 50% of their funding came from big pharma. The speaker notes, “the people that you’re supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money,” describing this as a conflict of interest and urging readers to consider the implication of funding influencing regulatory decisions.
The speaker then shifts to their personal experience with health issues and the challenge of finding valid information that isn’t paid for by big pharma. They share a statistic attributed to women with similar issues: “85 to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.” Although the speaker says they personally are not inclined to adopt gluten-free changes, they are cutting out refined carbs and sugars from their diet and report progress: “I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different.” This personal anecdote is presented in the context of comparing diet-driven symptom changes to pharmaceutical influence.
The speaker mentions ongoing changes to their living space and routines as part of their broader stance. They say, “we're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym,” signaling a strengthening or lifestyle shift. They also report, “we did get some egg laying birds,” suggesting new household activities. Throughout, there is a reiterated sentiment directed at big pharma: “basically saying a big to big pharma,” underscoring their stance against pharmaceutical influence.
Finally, the speaker emphasizes the surprising nature of the 47% funding figure and reiterates, “I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay.” They invite audience engagement, closing with, “as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone wanna talk about the fact that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry? 47%. And they only released this information because there was a rumor that 50% of their funding came from the pharmaceutical industry. So they came out and said, no. Actually, it's only 47%.
So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest. No? So I've been having a few health issues and I realized in researching which has been really difficult to actually find valid information that isn't paid for by big pharma, eighty five to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.
Now I personally am not one to do that, but I am cutting out refined carbs and sugars from my diet. I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different. Just kinda makes you wonder, but I'm excited to be bringing you guys along for this whole journey. We're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym. We did get some egg laying birds, and we're just basically saying a big to big pharma.
I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay. Anyway, as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.
reSee.it AI Summary
Initial post raises concerns about cysts in organs and parasites. In reply, the commenter argues organ cysts aren’t random but evidence of parasitic control operations ignored by Big Pharma. They claim parasites exploit modern food, water, and vaccines via nano bio agents to weaken immunity. Cysts supposedly act as antennas for frequency-based manipulation (HAARP, 5G, MK Ultra bio resonance), framed as population tuning rather than infection.
@ChrisJo00291974 - BunnyCrumbs
Cysts in organs aren’t “random medical issues”, they’re evidence of parasitic control operations ignored by Big Pharma. Parasites thrive because modern food, water, and vaccines are laced with nano bio agents that weaken immunity. These cysts act like biological antennas for frequency based manipulation, HAARP, 5G, and MK Ultra bio resonance testing. They call it “infection,” but it’s actually population tuning, parasitic mind harvesting disguised as health care.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a major study of 1.7 million UK NHS children aged 5–15 found heart damage only in those who received Covid mRNA vaccines. No unvaccinated child had heart problems. The researchers note zero COVID deaths in the entire group. The shots offered little protection, with many infections occurring after 14–15 weeks. The children studied were registered with the NHS.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
A major study involving 1.7 million children has found that heart damage only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from heart-related problems. In addition, the researchers note zero children from the entire group, vaccinated or unvaccinated, died from COVID-19. Furthermore, the study found that Covid shots offered the children very little protection from the virus, with many becoming infected after just 14 to 15 weeks of receiving an injection. The 1.7 million children observed in the study were between the ages of 5 to 15 and were registered with the UK’s National Healthcare System (NHS).
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
30 Year Old Warning Video 👇 https://t.co/ZfpjKT4PKR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that many basic foods have been deliberately modified, including tomato, potato, asparagus, broccoli, cauliflower, and other staples, and notes that there is a “terminator seed” now, which supposedly prevents farmers from planting seeds unless they buy them from the government. They claim watermelon is seedless and say they wouldn’t touch seedless watermelon. They state that the air we breathe contains toxins and that we are dealing with chemical sprays being sprayed over 245 major cities in the United States and around the world. The speaker contends that electronic metal “towers” have been erected and are part of a broader program, referencing HARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program).
Specific alleged technologies and programs are named: ILATA in Russia, described as electrified atmospheric discharge; ISACAT in Europe, described as scattered radar manipulation. The speaker claims these systems broadcast billions, not just millions, of watts on average, delivering ionic, electrified air particles into the air.
They claim that we are breathing titanium, aluminum, barium, nonhuman t cells, and other substances sprayed from ships that are not supposed to be there, leading to metal particulation in the body and an electrified air that is poisonous. They mention smoke stacks and car emissions as additional sources of pollutants, asserting that unless these toxins are cleaned out, the body will age rapidly, cells will deteriorate, and overall function will decline.
The speaker asserts widespread social effects: many people are described as dumbed down, comatose, brainwashed, vaccinated, inoculated, and encrypted, with “encrypted” sometimes equated to chipped. They claim you can be encrypted if you are vaccinated, if you visit certain labs for prosthetic devices (teeth or legs), or if you are under the skin through vaccination or implants. They state that encrypted foods and vaccines are part of a system designed to control a whole population, with the implication that those who are not encrypted are mind controlled.
There is a broader narrative about populist groups—black, white, brown, and yellow—being undermined, experimented on, and subjected to globalist control. The speaker suggests that those who have been subjected to “dumbed down” states will fight in “masters wars” or “globalist wars” and that the globalists are on their way out because their time is short. The closing contrast is that consciousness is long, implying a belief in enduring awareness despite these pressures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are the foods modified? Tomato, potato, asparagus, broccoli, cauliflower, almost all the basics are purposely. And as you know, they have a terminator seed now too. Yes. Because the farmers can't plant seed, you can't plant seed now unless you buy it from the government.
They come up one season and they're gone, which they're already modified. Watermelon is down here with seedless watermelon. I wouldn't even touch the watermelon with no with no seeds out. But if you breathe, what are you gonna breathe? You can't call it air anymore.
We breathe something that is overtaxing our body with toxins that we're trying to get through the day off. We have chemical sprays being sprayed over 245 major cities in The United States, and all over our planet now is an electronic metal small. And I can tell you why that's done too. We have these Gwen towers that they have erected, which are also perpetrating that continuous thing. We have HARP programs, high frequency active aurora research project.
We have ILATA over in Russia, electrified atmospheric discharge. We have ISACAT, European scattered radar manipulation. All these things are broadcasting billions. I didn't say millions. Combined billions of watts of average of ionic electrified air particles into the air.
We are breathing now titanium, aluminum, barium, nonhuman t cells, all kind of other things that's being sprayed from ships that aren't supposed to be there. So you have metal particulation in your system. You have electrified air, which is poisonous in your system. And then whatever else that the smoke stacks and the from cars are there too. Unless you can clean that out, your body's not only gonna age very quickly, the cells are gonna deteriorate and you're not gonna function on your height you should be.
That's why most people are wondering around dumb toe I call them comatose, dumb down, brainwashed, vaccinated, inoculated, and encrypted. Any two of which make you in in on your unusable to a society that's trying to develop. Heard those names before. But encrypted is? Chipped.
Mhmm. You go to the wrong shouldn't say this on TV. Let's put it away. Wrong lab that's making a prosthetic device, whether it be from your teeth or leg, they probably put a chip in. Mhmm.
Unless you're very careful. The food you eat is probably encrypted. If you ever need vaccinated, you are encrypted. If you're in armed services, you're encrypted. They're trying to control a whole populist, and this is the best way to do it.
Anytime anybody invades underneath your skin, nine times out of 10, now you're encrypted. If you're not encrypted, you're probably mind controlled. There's so much going on now that I sound like I am psychotic. I'm not. And I'll never say I'm crazy.
I'm I'm neurotic. My neurosis grows with the psychotic behavior of people and the apathy of people, the ennui of people who don't seem to understand what's going on. That's frightening to me because we're a planet trying to come under control. We are populist, black and white, brown and yellow, that is undermined control, dying right off the bat, being experimented with, and we still don't get it. Those who have been dumbed down, comatose, drainwashed, inoculated, vaccinated, encrypted, Any two of which takes them out of a usable society at this time can understand that.
So they will fight the masters wars. They will fight the globalist wars. They will take the globalist shots. They will let the globalist in the state raise their children, and we all sink. But the point is again, the globalists are on their way out.
That's why they're acting so crazy, but you watch my words. Their time is short. Consciousness is long.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"We have the right to know what they are spraying on us." Plane passengers suffer painful throats and breathing difficulties moments after flight attendants spray the cabin with WHO-mandated insecticide. https://t.co/pxzprrk8wz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is experiencing throat pain and asks what was sprayed that made them start sneezing, wondering what it is. They mention that it’s claimed the World Health Organization (OMS) approves it, but not as an obligation, and Bolivia “echarlo” (to reject/remove it).
Speaker 1 responds that the OMS “lo avala” and “no es obligación,” implying it’s approved but not mandatory, and says Bolivia should throw it out. They note that the OMS was also involved with vaccines, and that many things about vaccines were bad.
Speaker 1 adds that they cannot even opine on it, because “aquí más mosquitos hemos dicho” and suggests not bringing anything from Spain.
Speaker 0 emphasizes that as passengers they have the right to know what is being sprayed, since children are involved and could be allergic to some components. They remark that the spray doesn’t look very clear and that it’s very small.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Como que me duele la garganta. ¿Qué fue lo que rociaron y empecé a y empecé a estornudar? ¿Qué tiene? Sí, es que dice que está de Dice que la OMS lo avala, pero
Speaker 1: Lo avala y lo y obliga No es obligación. Bolivia echarlo.
Speaker 0: Pero la OMS también fue la que hizo lo de las vacunas, y salieron muchas cosas de las vacunas malas.
Speaker 1: No podemos ni opinar en eso. Ajá. Porque es para no, porque decimos, aquí más mosquitos hemos dicho, no lo sé, que que no traigamos nada de España.
Speaker 0: Sí, es que nosotros como como pasajeros, pues tenemos derecho a saber qué es lo que nos están echando, porque vienen niños, vienen
Speaker 1: Es, es.
Speaker 0: Sea alérgico, ¿no? A alguno de los compuestos que que vienen. La verdad que ni se ve muy bien, eso es muy chiquito.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Cysts in your organs and Parasites https://t.co/Z1R2zkTHlh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jennifer Sears shares her experience with parasites living in organs beyond the intestines. She describes a long medical journey after ultrasound findings revealed cysts in the liver, pancreas, and spleen. Her initial GP told her the cysts were benign and something to monitor, but Sears pursued further investigation. She notes that her own research suggested that cysts in the liver can be parasitic, specifically tapeworms, based on medical papers she found online. When she presented this information to her then-GP and later-to a younger doctor after a change in physicians, she says they dismissed the idea, with the newer doctor reacting as if Sears was hallucinating despite the receipts she brought. Sears explains that basic internet searches and AI-generated summaries supported her assertion that cysts and the organs can be tapeworms, making the hypothesis “very plausible” given her history of cats and finding tapeworms in them.
Following her deep dive, Sears undertook a two-month parasite cleanse, followed by a three-month wait, and then underwent another ultrasound, which showed zero cysts in any of the affected organs. She emphasizes the outcome of her experience, noting the ultrasound results as a payoff for the cleanse. She then prompts viewers to watch a video that explains her point and expresses relief that the information appears on mainstream media.
The video segment introduces a separate case from Edmonton, where a 36-year-old woman, Cassidy Armstrong, initially appeared to have a rare cancer based on a liver mass the size of a grapefruit and weight loss. A biopsy eventually revealed that the growth was not cancer but a parasite. Surgeons removed most of her liver, the gallbladder, and some lung nodules. The medical team then delivered the unexpected news: the parasite was identified as Echinococcus multilocularis, a tapeworm that can be transmitted to people through coyote or dog feces. The report notes that the parasite is believed to have originated in Europe and is increasing in Alberta, where coyotes are increasingly urban rather than wild prairie animals. Doctor Stan Houston states that in the past six years in Alberta, the parasite has been confirmed in fifteen people, thirteen of whom were dog owners. Cassidy Armstrong reportedly had clean habits and no dog of her own, yet doctors believe the parasitic cyst had been developing in her for about ten years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Jennifer Sears. I'm here today. I wanna talk about parasites, not just intestinal parasites, but parasites that live in your organs. So many years back, my GP sent me for a abdominal ultrasound.
They found a cyst in my liver. She said it was benign, that I had to check it. I refused. I asked her what is a cyst in my liver doing there, and she said, well, they're just benign. We don't know what they're caused from.
Great. I kept going for ultrasounds. Eventually, they found a cyst in my pancreas, in my spleen, and the one in my liver. So I had three organs with cysts. My doctor basically said, they're benign.
Don't worry about it. Me being me, of course, I did the deep dive into the research. First thing I found on the Internet, all the research papers that cysts in the liver are actually tapeworm, is actually parasitic. Now I've always owned cats, so I went with that knowledge to my GP. She had no idea.
Then my GP switched over because my first GP retired. I brought that information to her. She was younger. I thought she'd be more hip into the research, and I brought her these research papers saying, listen. I think that these cyst are tapeworms.
And she said, no. I've never heard of that. I don't think that's it. She literally looked at me like I had three heads. Even though I brought the receipts, brought her the information, I did basic Google searches that cysts and the organs are basically tapeworms.
So here's just a basic search I did. Literally, AI, first thing they pull up. Yes. Cysts on the liver can indeed be caused by parasites, most commonly by tapeworm. So and if you go into the research, you'll find tons of research papers on this subject.
So, I mean, I wasn't talking out of sorts like I was insane. It was very, very plausible because I've had cats, and I found tapeworm in my cats. So what I did was I did the biggest parasite cleanse of my life. I took two months and cycled a parasite cleanse, finished the parasite cleanse, waited three months, went and got an ultrasound, zero cysts on any of my organs. Now I want you to watch this video.
This video is explaining exactly what I was just explaining to you, and I'm so glad that it was on mainstream media. Check this out.
Speaker 1: First, an Edmonton woman was told she was dying of a rare cancer, and then her diagnosis became even more bizarre. Our Sue Ling Goh joins us now with more in Sue Ling. She says everyone needs to know about what happened to her.
Speaker 2: The 36 year old had pain near her ribs and she was losing weight. Everything pointed to cancer until the biopsy revealed something that was both good and bad news. The growth in Cassidy Armstrong's liver was the size of a grapefruit.
Speaker 3: This dark spot right here is the mass.
Speaker 2: Doctors said it was a rare cancer and she would die within a few years.
Speaker 3: It didn't look good. It was pretty sad and scary.
Speaker 2: Surgeons removed most of her liver, her gallbladder and some nodules from her lungs. Then a biopsy surprised everyone.
Speaker 3: They said, we have some good news for you. We don't think this is cancer. We think that this is a parasite.
Speaker 2: The rare parasite Echinococcus multilocularis is a tapeworm that can be passed to people through coyote or dog feces. Studies suggest it came from Europe, and it's on the rise in Alberta coyotes.
Speaker 4: Coyotes are no longer, you know, wild wild creatures of the and the and and the prairies. They're urban they're urban animals.
Speaker 2: Doctor Stan Houston says in the past six years in Alberta, the parasite's been confirmed in fifteen people. Thirteen were dog owner. Cassidy has clean habits, doesn't own a dog, and has always been active and healthy. Doctors believe the parasitic cyst was growing in her for ten years.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
WiFi Enhances Mold Growth https://t.co/RtukdhatfM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts several connected claims about mold, indoor air quality, and electromagnetic frequencies. First, they state that mold is present in about 90% of people's homes and commonly found in bathrooms, moist areas, and basements. They emphasize that the growth and toxicity of mold are increased by electromagnetic frequencies such as WiFi. They describe mold, particularly black mold and green mold, as among the most toxic substances people are exposed to inside homes. The speaker argues that indoor air quality can be as much as a thousand times worse than outdoor air quality, even in large cities with many vehicles and other pollutants, and they point to drier vents releasing synthetic fragrances as part of the problem. They describe the combination as a “perfect toxic concoction” because WiFi is said to increase mold growth and can be strengthened by it.
Additionally, the speaker provides a quantitative claim about biotoxins: the production of biotoxins in mold culture increased more than 600 times after exposure to ambient electromagnetic frequencies. Throughout, the emphasis is on the interaction between electromagnetic frequencies (like WiFi) and mold, suggesting that exposure to these frequencies both promotes mold growth and amplifies mold toxicity. The statements link ubiquitous indoor mold presence with widespread indoor air quality concerns and claim a significant enhancement of mold-related biotoxins when mold is exposed to ambient EMF frequencies. The overall message centers on the idea that EMF exposure from common wireless sources can exacerbate mold proliferation and toxin production, contributing to indoor air quality problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just found out something crazy about WiFi and all these other different frequency bands, and it is shocking. Did you know that mold, which is in, like, 90% of people's homes, bathrooms, any other moist areas, basements, The growth and toxicity of mold is increased by electromagnetic frequencies like Wi Fi. So if you didn't know, mold is one of the you know, especially black mold, and there's green mold too, are some of the most toxic things that people are exposed to in their homes. And indoor air quality can be, like, a thousand times worse than outdoor air quality even if you're living in a big city with lots of vehicles and freaking drier vents pumping out those synthetic fragrances, etcetera. But so now it's a perfect toxic concoction because Wi Fi increases the mold growth and can actually be strengthened by it.
The production of biotoxins in mold culture increased more than 600 times after being exposed to ambient electromagnetic EMF frequencies.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
In 1931, a doctor discovered the real root of cancer and the world ignored him. His name was Dr. Otto Warburg. He won the Nobel Prize for discovering something that should have changed cancer treatment forever. https://t.co/VtKFeyd3Yb
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1931, a doctor named Otto Warburg purportedly identified the real root of cancer and suggested that the world ignored him. According to the speaker, Warburg won the Nobel Prize for discovering something that should have transformed cancer treatment forever. The core claim presented is that cancer does not begin with bad genes; it begins when cells can no longer use oxygen to produce energy. Warburg purportedly discovered that cancer cells ferment sugar even in the presence of oxygen, a phenomenon referred to as the Warburg effect. The speaker emphasizes that, despite this theory, cancer treatment today is still approached as if cancer is solely genetic, implying a disconnect between Warburg’s findings and common medical practice.
The speaker asserts personal involvement with Warburg’s theory. He states that he was diagnosed with a grade four diffuse astrocytoma brain cancer and applied Warburg’s theory in his own life. According to the speaker, this involved completely cutting sugar from his diet and entering therapeutic ketosis. He also mentions using oxygen therapy and structuring his life around one primary objective: restoring mitochondrial function. He claims that, as a result, he is now cancer free. The narrative frames Warburg’s insight as correct all along, and the speaker indicates that he had to discover this for himself rather than being told about it.
Additionally, the speaker offers an actionable resource for the audience. He states that if listeners want the exact protocol he followed, they should comment “protocol” below, and he will send the protocol to them for free. The message closes with an expression of gratitude and affection, thanking the audience and expressing love for them all.
Key points highlighted include: Warburg’s assertion that cancer is a metabolic disease linked to cellular energy production rather than solely a genetic issue; the Warburg effect, where cancer cells ferment sugar even when oxygen is available; a critique of current cancer treatment as if it is exclusively genetic; a personal testimony of achieving cancer remission through sugar restriction, therapeutic ketosis, oxygen therapy, and mitochondrial restoration; and an invitation to receive the exact protocol by commenting the requested keyword.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1931, a doctor discovered the real root of cancer, and the world ignored him. His name was Doctor. Otto Warburg. He won the Nobel Prize for discovering something that should have changed cancer treatment forever. Cancer doesn't begin with bad genes.
It begins when cells can no longer use oxygen to make energy. Warburg discovered that cancer cells ferment sugar even when oxygen is available. This is called the Warburg effect. And here's the kicker. We're still treating cancer today as if it's only genetic.
But Warburg was right. Cancer is a metabolic disease and I'm living proof. When I was first diagnosed with a grade four diffuse astrocytoma brain cancer, I applied his theory. I cut sugar out completely. I entered therapeutic ketosis.
I used oxygen therapy, and I built my body around one goal, restoring mitochondrial function. And today, I'm cancer free. Warburg had it right all along, but no one told me. I had to find it out for myself. If you want the exact protocol I followed, simply comment protocol below, and I'll send it to you for free.
Once again, thank you for joining me on this journey. I love you all so much.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
AstraZeneca has admitted for the first time in court documents that its Covid vaccine can cause blood clots, despite everybody being assured repeatedly that it was "safe and effective". https://t.co/elAjFtY3lb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the current coverage of the AstraZeneca vaccine and the assessment of safety concerns that have been in the news. The speaker states a firm personal position regarding the vaccine, emphasizing continued confidence in its safety and specifically asserting that there is, at this point, no evidence that the AstraZeneca vaccine causes blood clots. This assertion is presented as a clear conclusion based on available information.
Further support for this position comes from official health authorities. The TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) is described as closely monitoring the situation. The speaker notes that the TGA has issued a statement on the matter, which conveys the same core message: while they are aware of the situation and have maintained close contact with European authorities, there is no link identified between the AstraZeneca vaccine and the reported blood clot cases as of now. The implication is that ongoing vigilance will continue, but current data do not indicate a causal relationship between the vaccine and blood clots.
In addition to Australian authorities, the international response is cited to reinforce the stance. The World Health Organization (WHO) is reported as having issued a similar assessment overnight, aligning with the local authorities’ conclusion that there is no established connection between the AstraZeneca vaccine and the blood clot concerns at this time. The speaker highlights this international corroboration to underscore a consensus across different health governance levels.
Within Australia, there is mention of a collaborative and unanimous position among key health bodies. The speaker references full alignment between themselves, the TGA, and the ATAGI group (the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation), describing a united front regarding the current understanding of the vaccine’s safety profile in relation to blood clots. The language used signals a coordinated stance aimed at reassuring the public while continuing to monitor developments.
Overall, the message conveyed is that, based on current information from national and international health authorities, there is no evidence linking the AstraZeneca vaccine to blood clots. The authorities are actively monitoring the situation, maintaining vigilance for any new data, and reiterating a consistent conclusion that supports the vaccine’s safety profile in this context. This summary captures the emphasis on confidence, ongoing surveillance, and concordant assessments from the TGA, ATAGI, and the WHO.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other element I want to talk about today is there's been a lot of news around the AstraZeneca vaccine. In this situation, I can absolutely say that I remain confident in this AstraZeneca vaccine, that it's safe, and that there is, at this point, no, evidence that it causes blood clots. No evidence that it causes blood clots. The TGA itself is closely monitoring the situation, and they have put a a statement out today, essentially saying the same thing, that whilst they are aware of the situation and have been in close contact with European authorities, At this point, they do not see any link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and this blood clot issue. So, of course, we will continue to monitor that situation, But here in Australia, myself, the TGA, the ATAGI group, are all in unanimous agreement that there is nothing, no limit between AstraZeneca and the blood clots.
Internationally, the World Health Organization came out overnight and did the same thing.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Whistleblower claims that vaccines were used to deliberately spread AIDS in South Africa https://t.co/SPxEe1q6bT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a unit in Saima that went into African countries; "And how was that done exactly?" "Through inoculation. Through vaccines. Vaccines." "Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people." "There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people." "And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And can can can we talk I I just do the question again, and then you can pop in. Oh, yeah. You mentioned actively spreading AIDS? There was a unit in Saima that one of the things was that we went into African countries. And how was that done exactly?
Through inoculation. Through vaccines? Yeah. Through vaccines. Vaccines.
Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people. There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer.
It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people. And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes.
To African countries.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"We all get paid more if we make you sicker" - An Honest Doctor https://t.co/DKnYXpbyuy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Scott Jensen asserts that financial incentives in healthcare motivate providers to make patients sicker. He explains that Medicare and insurers profit when patients are categorized as more ill, and cites programs that reward clinics for reaching vaccine uptake thresholds. For example, an influenza vaccine incentive could pay per patient if a clinic hits 60% or 80% vaccination among eligible patients, potentially yielding tens of thousands annually. He also claims we can be labeled diabetic through a simple A1C reading even without treatment. Once labeled diabetic, a clinician is typically rewarded for keeping the A1C below targets (often 7.5 or even under 7–8). He ends by noting: But if you can call someone a diabetic with an A1C...
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Doctor. Scott Jensen, and I am not exaggerating when I tell you if you're a patient, your doctor, your insurance company, your clinic, your hospital, we can all get paid more if we make you sicker. And I think you need to understand that. This patient's on Medicare.
His insurance company will get paid more by Medicare if this patient is seen as more sick. There's all kinds of incentive plans being doled out by insurance companies and governments, government programs, to clinics and providers and healthcare systems. For instance, one of them that you may have heard of is, if a clinic can hit a certain threshold level of patients taking a certain kind of vaccine, they get paid a chunk of money for each one of those patients that took the vaccine. So it's not uncommon to have, like, an influenza vaccine incentive program, and say you have a thousand patients that could potentially qualify. Well, if you could hit, say, sixty percent, you might get this amount of money per patient.
If you can hit eighty percent, they'll give you this much. Literally, doctors can get tens and tens of thousands of dollars on an annual basis for an incentive program as simple as that. Here's another one. If we can call you diabetic based on some parameters, even if we're not treating you with the medication or didn't really do anything for you, if we can call you diabetic and we do a test called an A1C. Now, if we do an A1C and we get a 6.8 reading, that allows us to call you diabetic, even if we don't do anything for you.
And when a person has diabetes, generally a doctor or a clinic will get a good mark if they can keep that person's A1C less than 7.5, sometimes less than eight, sometimes less than seven. But if you can call someone a diabetic with an A1C
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
This is Kennedy in 2008 testifying to Congress on the harmful effects of mercury. Ed Markey was the chair who invited him, and he now says, “Robert Kennedy Jr. is an unqualified, unserious, and dangerous nominee for US Secretary of Health and Human Services.” https://t.co/KnPQX4Av4Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
"The mercury is coming from those coal burning power plants."
"According to CDC, the mercury there's one out of every six American women now has so much mercury in her womb that her children at risk for a grim inventory of diseases, autism, blindness, mental retardation, heart, liver, and kidney disease."
"The Clinton administration recognizing the gravity of this national health epidemic reclassified mercury as a hazardous pollutant under the Clean Air Act."
"That triggered a requirement that all of those plants remove 90% of the mercury within three and a half years."
"It would have cost them less than 1% of plant revenues, and we know that it works."
"When they stop emitting the mercury, it disappears within five years mostly from the fish and waterways downwind of those plants."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About eight years ago, the EPA announced that in 19 states, it is now unsafe to eat any freshwater fish caught in the state because of mercury contamination. The mercury is coming from those coal burning power plants. In 49 states, at least some of the fish are on safety. In fact, the only fish state where all of the fish are safety is Dick Chaney's home state of Wyoming, where the republicans controlled legislature has refused to appropriate the money to test the fish. We know a lot about mercury now.
According to CDC, the mercury there's one out of every six American women now has so much mercury in her womb that her children at risk for a grim inventory of diseases, autism, blindness, mental retardation, heart, liver, and kidney disease. I have so much mercury in my body just from eating fish, two and a half times what EPA is considered safe. I was told by doctor David Carpenter who's the principal authority on mercury toxicity in this country that if a woman with my levels of mercury in her blood would have children with cognitive impairment with permanent brain neurological injury. Today according to CDC, there's six hundred forty thousand children born in this country every year who've been exposed to dangerous levels of mercury in their mother's wombs. The Clinton administration recognizing the gravity of this national health epidemic reclassified mercury as a hazardous pollutant under the Clean Air Act.
That triggered a requirement that all of those plants remove 90% of the mercury within three and a half years. It would have cost them less than 1% of plant revenues, and we know that it works. When they stop emitting the mercury, it disappears within five years mostly from the fish and waterways downwind of those plants. But this is an industry that received a 100 that donated a $156,000,000 to president Bush and his party since the two thousand election cycle. And they got their reward was leaders like mister Homestead here who came in and eviscerated that rule and instead replaced the rule that was written by utility industry lobbyists, his own law firm, Latham and Watkins, which allowed which which which ended the essentially the regulation, that tight regulation of mercury and allows these utilities to continue to discharge mercury at huge rates for endless periods of
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript discusses a confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government dating back to 2015. It notes "Frankenstein coronavirus" and that "the NIH and Moderna were collaborating with Doctor. Barrick" with "His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement." It says "the NIH appears to be transferring the mRNA tech to Doctor. Barrick." It asserts "'mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.'" The transcript also states "'the government co owns the vaccine.'" It adds "'This is not part of that.'" It emphasizes "This is 2015." It concludes with "The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. You better share that one quick. Don't know how long it's gonna last."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll see how long this one makes it for. Are you ready? This is a 153 pages of the confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government. And it goes back to 2015. What?
Jason, what was happening in 2015? Frankenstein coronavirus. That's right. The same time Doctor. Barrick and Doctor.
Shi published their on the new Frankenstein coronavirus. In fact, let's skip down to page 104. It shows that the NIH and Moderna were collaborating with Doctor. Barrick. Wow.
His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement. But let's get back up to the top of the specific agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring the mRNA tech to Doctor. Barrick. But look what they want to make clear, quote, mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.
I'm sorry. I mean, I've seen ulterior motives before, but usually you see them coming. Did you know that the government co owns the vaccine? Oh, by the way, this is not part of the Trump's thing. This is this is not part of that.
This is 2015. The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. You better share that one quick. Don't know how long it's gonna last.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
One question for me. Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?
They don't.
And am I right in suggesting that a medicine by definition is something which contains synthetic molecules, something that that is registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine?
Absolutely.
a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating, culling the human family.
Intentionally.
Intentionally, using synthetic molecules, which by design are cancer aids, all of them.
It's so for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die.
It is.
It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One question for me. Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?
Speaker 1: They don't.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, none.
Speaker 0: And am I right in suggesting that a medicine by definition is something which contains synthetic molecules, something that that is registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine?
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Right. So what I'm learning from you, doctor Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating, culling the human family.
Speaker 1: Intentionally.
Speaker 0: Intentionally, using synthetic molecules, which by design are cancer aids, all of them.
Speaker 1: It's so for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. So we'll just start off in Africa. We'll start doing our research there and we'll eliminate most of the Africans because they're deplorable.
They're worthless. They're not part of this world economy. So they have their rights taken away and they're suppressed and they're experimented.
Speaker 0: And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory so called authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized and appear, I again use the word appear advisedly, we're not casting judgments here, we're taking depositions, listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?
Speaker 1: It is. It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living? They don't.
Medicine by definition contains synthetic molecules, registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine.
A quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating the human family intentionally, using synthetic molecules which by design are cancer aids.
It's for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. So we'll start off in Africa and eliminate most of the Africans because they're deplorable.
Multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory authorities appear to have become weaponized and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil.
It is. It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One question for me. Where does any synthetic molecule serve the living?
Speaker 1: They don't.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, none.
Speaker 0: And am I right in suggesting that a medicine by definition is something which contains synthetic molecules, something that that is registered, patented, and put into the market as a medicine?
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Right. So what I'm learning from you, doctor Young, is that a quadrillion dollar enterprise is at work amongst us decimating, culling the human family.
Speaker 1: Intentionally.
Speaker 0: Intentionally, using synthetic molecules, which by design are cancer aids, all of them.
Speaker 1: It's so for purpose of sterilization and population control. There's too many people on the planet we need to get rid of. In the words of Bill Gates, at least three billion people need to die. So we'll just start off in Africa. We'll start doing our research there and we'll eliminate most of the Africans because they're deplorable.
They're worthless. They're not part of this world economy. So they have their rights taken away and they're suppressed and they're experimented.
Speaker 0: And the multilateral agencies and the health and regulatory so called authorities and agencies appear in the main to have become weaponized and appear, I again use the word appear advisedly, we're not casting judgments here, we're taking depositions, listening to expert testimonies, appear to be weaponized and appear to be working in collusion against the living men and women of the soil. Is that a fair statement?
Speaker 1: It is. It's not a bacterial war. It's a systemic poisoning war. And they're using chemical warfare against all of us.
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed unimaginable horrors in the hospital after the rollout of the mRNA injections. Patients experienced severe conditions like encephalitis, gangrene of the spine, and rapid multi-organ failure. Seizures were rampant, and despite medications, some patients had to be put down. I saw healthy individuals in their 20s needing amputations due to massive blood clots. Doctors seemed baffled and failed to connect these symptoms to vaccine injuries, labeling them simply as strokes or heart attacks instead. The situation was intense and unprecedented.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly, before they rolled out the mRNA injections...[For] days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it, and eventually they...kinda had to be put down." A hospital medical coder who goes only by "Zoe" for this interview describes for Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) the horrors she witnessed following the rollout of the COVID injections. Among the unthinkable, and deadly, illnesses were things like encephalitis, gangrene of the spine, blood clots, strokes, and multiple system organ failure. "I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically, so quickly, before they rolled out the mRNA injections...It was insane, I've never seen anything like that. The worst of them, they called it sepsis, but it was like instant multi-organ failure. Like, within hours patients would die of liver, lung, kidney... failure [all at once]..." Zoe tells CHD. She adds that "Some of the records...[from the] emergency crew that found them [the injection victims], it's like their body tried to reject everything and [in] some of these cases their family would be there 30 minutes before, and then within an hour they're dead." Zoe notes that "there were patients coming in with seizures like I'd never seen before," and that hospital staff "couldn't control some of them." The coder adds, "[For] days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it, and eventually they...kinda had to be put down." "They called it encephalitis, or encephalopathy, and then later on, even the coding organization...[called it] COVID-19-associated encephalitis," Zoe says. "[T]he clots were insane," the coder notes. "Never seen clots like that before—even the interventional radiologists that were going in with...scopes where they can do heart interventions and do stents [a stent is a tube usually constructed of a metallic alloy or a polymer] in carotid artery (if you have a stroke going to your brain), normally it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting...multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before." Zoe goes on to say that "There were people that were hiking in their 20s that were totally healthy, that had been running marathons, that suddenly needed a leg amputated because they had a massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved." "There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I'd never seen before," the coder adds. "And, you know, you can't amputate the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally they cut out tissue that's dying like that so it prevents further infection and they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was...basically replace that part of [their] spine with an implant, that's the best they could do... It was really intense." As for doctors' responses to these horrors, Zoe says, "[they] were baffled, they weren't connecting the dots." However, she adds that "Knowing what the potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we 100% had all the things I just described." Despite that knowledge, "doctors would never tell [patients] that. They would just say, 'It's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot.' And then they would never connect the two."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. Within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. There were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Overnight spinal gangrene. I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started looking into what it could do. I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two. They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there?
Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. It was insane. I've never seen anything like that. Patient the worst of them were the ones called it sepsis, but it was, like, instant multi organ failure.
Like, within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. It was like their some of the records, the emergency crew that found them, it's like their body tried to reject everything. And and some of these cases, like, their family would be there thirty minutes before, and then within an hour, they're dead. And then there were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. We couldn't control some of them.
Days, patients would be seizing, and no medications would stop it. And eventually, they kind of had to put down. They called it encephalitis or encephalopathy. And then later on, even the coding information organization, AHIMA, admitted COVID nineteen associated encephalitis. There were blood clots, strokes.
The clots were insane. Never seen clots like that before. Even the interventional radiologist that were going in with, you know, they have angiopathies and, you know, different scopes where they can do, like, heart interventions and put stents in, like, a carotid artery if you have a stroke going to your brain. They normally, it's rare to have more than one stent go in, and they were documenting, you know, multiple locations all at once. They had heart attack cases that were like that where they, you know, they needed massive amounts of stents that they never needed before.
There were people in their twenties that had been hiking that were totally healthy, had been running marathons that suddenly needed an a leg amputated because they had massive blood clot going from their hip all the way down to their leg, and it couldn't be saved. So that happened. There were some cases of overnight spinal gangrene, which I've never seen before. And you can't amputate, you know, the spine when it goes gangrenous. Normally, cut out tissue that's dying like that, so it prevents further infection.
And they didn't know what to do. The only thing they could do was, you know, do a basically replace the that part of your spine with an implant. That's the best they could do. Yeah. It was really intense.
And I didn't question the vaccines as much as I should have. I started to about the flu shot way back in 02/2004. But with the pressure to get the COVID nineteen shot, I started looking into what it could do, and I I knew I didn't want anything to do with this experimental mRNA thing. And when I started looking into the experts that were saying, well, this is what this potential vaccine could do. This is what the research says.
I was looking at the vaccine trials and what's happening to those patients and the Guill Barre that was happening and the strokes that were happening. And so I kind of knew to look for that when the vaccine came out. And the doctors were, you know, baffled. They weren't connecting the dots. But to me, knowing what the potential causes or potential symptoms of a vaccine injury could be, we a hundred percent had all the things that I just described.
But doctors would never tell you that. They would just say it's a stroke. It's a heart attack. It's a blood clot, and they would never connect the two.
Speaker 0: Is there anything that would make you take a vaccination of any kind ever again?
Speaker 1: They would have to kill me. Nothing. Nothing would make me take it.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Covid-19 was the biggest scam in human history https://t.co/TAQvhQgISZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Coronavirus was isolated in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models, associated with the common cold. In 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. In 1967, the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus were conducted. Between 1975 and 1977, we started modifying coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. By 1990, Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent for coronavirus was filed. From 1990 to 02/2018, every publication on coronavirus vaccines concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it mutates too quickly. In 02/2002, UNC Chapel Hill patented ‘an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus’ funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 02/2002. That work allegedly preceded SARS-1; SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to attack human beings, patented in 02/2002.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most of you don't know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious replicatable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition. It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons. And you heard me correctly, that was 1965.
And by the way, these slides are public domain. You're welcome to look at every single reference. Every comment that I made is based on published material. So do make sure that you look at those references. But in 1966, the very first COV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation.
And you heard the date, 1966. I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that's been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first Transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between The United States and The United Kingdom.
And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn't that amazing? Fifty six years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been fifty six years in engineering. And I want that to chill with all of you. Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties?
Where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing to do to take a pathogen for The United States and infect the world with it. Where was that conversation? And what should have been that conversation in 1967? That conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera in the nineteen seventies.
And in 1975, 1976, and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals, pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and pigs found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine patent filed, are you ready for this, in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? 1990, operation warp speed?
I'm sorry. Where's the warp and the speed? Pfizer, 1990, the very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus. Isn't that fascinating? Isn't it fascinating that we were we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing.
We just found out that that's the problem. No. As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now now the problem. We found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1990 for the spike protein of coronavirus. And who would have thought?
Pfizer. Clearly, the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health. Clearly Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber and every chamber of every government around the world. Not that Pfizer. Certainly, they wouldn't have had anything to do with this.
But, oh, yes, they did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn't work. You know why they didn't work? It turns out that coronavirus is a very malleable model.
It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 02/2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective. And since 1990 to 02/2018, that is the published science, ladies and gentlemen. That's following the science. Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn't work.
And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few 100 and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies. These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows unequivocally, including efforts of the chimaera modifications made by Ralph Barrack in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That's the science, and that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 02/2002, and this data is most important.
Because in 02/2002, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote, an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus. Listen to those words, infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon.
It means something meant to target an individual, but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That's what infectious replication defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 02/2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS one point o by a year. Dave, are you suggesting that SARS one point o wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill?
No. I'm not suggesting it. I'm telling you that's the facts. We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon.
The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It's called influenza like illness. It's called gastroenteritis. That's the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 02/2002.
And in 02/2003,
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
A report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has revealed that a staggering 120,000 American children “DIED SUDDENLY” following the rollout of the mRNA Covid jabs. https://t.co/MGGtfNx8Jw
Video Transcript AI Summary
OECD's bombshell report, suppressed by the mainstream media, claims that 'nearly half a million children and young adults have now died since the injections were approved for use on most children.' 'And here is the figure that the mainstream media are working overtime to hide from you.' 'Over one hundred and eighteen thousand of those deaths are suspected to be linked to the COVID vaccine side effects,' with 'deafening silence from the mainstream media.' 'We have compiled a rogue's gallery of crooks who lie to our faces about the vaccines.' Later, 'Under transmission, the data are not there, limited to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission of SARS CoV two.' 'Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before it's entered the market? No.' 'Shameful. Turns out they were all telling bare faced lies to the public.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Down to six months of age. Just over a year on, the bombshell report, which has just been published by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and subsequently suppressed by the mainstream media, revealed that nearly half a million children and young adults have now died since the injections were approved for use on most children. And here is the figure that the mainstream media are working overtime to hide from you. Over one hundred and eighteen thousand of those deaths are suspected to be linked to the COVID vaccine side effects. Despite the staggering death toll revealed in the report, it's been met with deafening silence from the mainstream media.
We shouldn't be surprised. The report exposes the globalist elite and their propagandists in the mainstream media as the frauds and liars that they are. All through 2021, Democrat president Joe Biden's administration and then chief medical adviser doctor Anthony Fauci continued to insist that the COVID jobs were safe and effective for all ages. According to Fauci, vaccines were necessary for protecting kids from the virus, despite children only showing mild symptoms, if any at all. We have compiled a rogue's gallery of crooks who lie to our faces about the vaccines.
All of these people have the blood of hundreds of thousands of American children on their hands.
Speaker 1: Not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.
Speaker 2: We can kind of almost see the end. We're we're vaccinating so very fast. Our data from the CDC today suggest, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick.
Speaker 3: Getting vaccinated and getting a booster shot when eligible can save your life and protect you and your family and friends from getting seriously ill and spreading infection. What do you think the probability is? Eighty percent?
Speaker 4: Personally, I think it's a hundred percent. I think that there's a reduction in transmission. COVID if you have these vaccinations.
Speaker 5: We have all the vaccines we need. We just need our people to take it, a, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. You wanna be a dead end to the virus. So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person.
Speaker 6: Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this.
Speaker 4: But when we look at the emergency use authorization, which is right on the screen, if you look what it says under transmission, this is what was known the moment they were making those things. Can I have the next slide, please? What was known was that the data are not there, limited to assess the effects of the vaccine against transmission of SARS CoV two. They had no idea. They had no idea if it would stop the infection, yet they were making those statements on the news.
Speaker 7: Us, the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer. Yes or no?
And I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before it's entered the market? No.
Speaker 0: Shameful. Turns out they were all telling bare faced lies to the public. But it gets even worse. Despite the mountain of evidence proving the globalists were lying to us about the COVID pandemic and their experimental jabs, some people continue to believe the lies.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
COVID 19 Vaccine Ingredients Dr Christiane Northrup https://t.co/aj76SmuQDt
Video Transcript AI Summary
"72 mandated vaccines by the age of 18." They start injecting pregnant women second trimester. "In 1986, congress gave big pharma carte blanche, put in whatever you want. You have absolutely no liability." "And in that year, the vaccine schedule tripled." "Babies are getting seven shots at the same time." "This shot is experimental and on and you it did not get FDA approval. That was a complete fraud." "under an EUA, emergency use authorization." The synthetic mRNA is a program that they put into your body. It instructs your cells to produce the spike protein. The spike protein in itself creates the disease. It also contains fetal cell lines, kidney cells, retinal cells, lung cells. These are immortal meaning that they are cancerous. The COVID contained polyethylene glycol. Seventy percent of people are allergic to this. Luciferase. The shot contains a bioluminescent dye.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Here we go. What's in the shot? First of all, the childhood wellness plan. Everybody, 72 mandated vaccines by the age of 18.
They start injecting pregnant women second trimester. They give ninety nine percent of newborns hepatitis b vaccine. It came contains biopersistent aluminum. It's the beginning of the problem. This is the scaffold that's been going on and on and on.
In 1986, congress gave big pharma carte blanche, put in whatever you want. You have absolutely no liability. And in that year, the vaccine schedule tripled. I fell into grace, I call it, when I testified against vaccine mandates in our legislature. Maine had a ninety five percent voluntary vaccination rate.
People actually believed in them, and they passed it anyway. So now you you know I don't have to tell you the rest of the story but that's '72 and take a look at how many that is. Babies are getting seven shots at the same time. You baby boomers out there, oh, vaccines are safe safe and effective. Don't you remember polio and all of that stuff?
Well, guess what? You had maybe four. These kids have 72. That means that the people who first started with the 72 shots and now that doesn't count flu or Gardasil or shingles or pneumonia or all the stuff that they're doing. Those people are now 35 years old.
They've already entered the zombie apocalypse. Next slide. Okay. So this shot is experimental and on and you it did not get FDA approval. That was a complete fraud.
Okay? So whatever is out there is still under an EUA, emergency use authorization. Next slide. We're gonna go fast here. The synthetic mRNA is a program that they put into your body.
It's not like anything that's ever seen. Next next slide. Okay. And it instructs your cells to produce the spike protein. Next slide.
The spike protein in itself creates the disease. Next. Okay. So it also contains fetal cell lines, kidney cells, retinal cells, lung cells. These are immortal meaning that they are cancerous And and Vandersteel just told me that that kidney cell is now it's a flavor additive in all kinds of foods.
It's shocking. Yeah. Yeah. Check that out. And once Clay talked about that, Wikipedia changed their story.
Nice. Okay. Next slide. Okay. So it's unknown the health implications of injecting fetal DNA from 1970 into your body.
We don't know. Next slide. Okay. All these shots, the COVID contained polyethylene glycol. Seventy percent of people are allergic to this.
Remember when they told you go in, get your shot with an EpiPen. And then think of how stupid this is. You'd lose your ability to breathe and then they would say, oh, the shot is working. Did you see any of those stupid Facebook videos? I've had my second shot.
I'm in bed. I've never been so sick, but I know it's working. Get your shot. Have you lost your minds? Okay.
Next slide. Okay. And then thousands of products contain polyethylene glycol, thousands of them, which means you've all had an opportunity to become sensitized. We didn't used to have that in things. Next slide.
Polysorbate eighty are you happy with your kids being injected with this stuff? They're about to, experiment on babies and children under the age of 12 now. We should be outraged. Next slide, which I can't read. Oh, this is one of my favorites.
Luciferase. The shot contains a bioluminescent dye. Have you seen the black light? You have the shot. You put a black light on it.
Good. You can see it throughout your entire body. Yay. Next slide. Okay.
S m one zero two. That's luciferase. It's a poison. Next slide. Okay.
Hydrogen nanoparticles. DARPA hydrogel. Next slide. And, now this is new ways to deliver drugs. By the way, you know when they say, oh well, you don't need to have the shot, but you're gonna have to be tested twice a week.
You think that that test is benign? It is not. Next slide. Okay. So this is the DARPA hydrogel and what it does, it puts these little fibers into your body that combine with your biologic tissue and begin to create an entire network within your pineal and all of that.
Okay. Next slide. Okay. So I want you to see how this stuff looks and this is just from the swabs. Next slide.
Okay. Crystalline hydrogel it makes all of these things within your body the minute goes in there it starts. Next slide. Okay. Yeah.
The the DARPA hydrogel creates blood clots. Sixty to seventy percent of the people who've had the injection have a positive d dimer test, meaning that will show that you have micro clots. And it might not get you the first time, oh, hey, I'm just fine. Nothing's wrong with me, but wait a year, wait two years, wait three years, next leg. Okay.
Then we have spyence. Have you seen those things on Instagram? Damn. I got the shot and now the scissors is sticking to me. Right?
Okay. And that is because of super magnetic magnetite. This is a thing called magnifection magnifection. You can't believe how diabolical the deep state is. Okay.
Next slide. Okay. Graphene oxide. This stuff I have an electrician friend. He goes, oh, yeah.
We use that. That conducts electricity really well. Yeah. That's the whole point. Injecting yourself with that.
Next slide. Okay. Graphene six six six is the chemical formulation. Does that sound familiar? And, so that's in the shots.
That's also a poison. Next slide. Okay. This is the cryptocurrency six 66. That's the patent number from the Gates Foundation to connect you to the, to cryptocurrency social credit score.
Next slide. Okay. This is classic symptoms of electromagnetic radiation. Now this transmission you hear about is probably because the DARPA hydrogel has some kind of a voltage. So what people are getting when they're around a recently vaccinated people, bloody nose, 18 old babies, passing clots, that kind of thing, might be from the voltage of the DARPA hydrogel, we're not sure.
And when that hydrogel goes through a hypodermic needle, the shearing force activates it. Next slide. Okay. And then this was all over the Olympics. Unilever, you know, they're combining artificial intelligence with biology.
Okay. What could possibly go wrong? Next slide. Okay. And then 40 mechanisms of injury, doctor Sherry Tenpenny.
Every one of you needs to get Sherri's 40 mechanisms of injury. It's all from the peer reviewed literature. All the links are there. She's got them as PDFs. Doctor tenpenny dot com.
Any naysayer you read this game over. Next slide. Okay. So far we've had 701,559 severe injuries and only one percent of the injuries are even reported. Next slide.
And they don't want you to see us. Look at these these are the frontline workers who went and got the shot. Now they can't walk. Now they can't work and they're told here's what they tell them which women have been told forever. Oh, it's anxiety.
It's all in your head. Let's just give you some Valium. You'll be fine little lady. So there's thousands and thousands of these people who don't have anyone to go to because this has been done. Talk about crimes against humanity.
Next slide. Then that's fourteen thousand nine hundred and twenty five deaths so far. What in the world is going on? And if every one of you and everyone you know just stood up and said, we're done. Do you understand it would just be over?
Just be over. Next slide. Okay. Tom Rents, our hero, had a whistleblower come from the CDC who can prove that with one database only, one out of eleven, there have been forty five thousand deaths within the first three days of having the shot. But here's what happens when you go to the doctor.
Same thing, by the way, if your kid has a shot and then begins to have seizures and loses the ability to speak and walk, oh, that's a coincidence. That's what they tell you. You've had the shot, you dropped dead. Oh, that wasn't related. That must have been a coincidence.
Are you kidding me? I'm disgusted with my profession. Absolutely disgusted. Next slide. Okay.
When we had the swine flu, they stopped the program of the vaccines after fifty four deaths. When is this gonna stop? Not until we stop it. Next slide. Okay.
Myocarditis, four hundred and eighty two cases. This happens in young men, and now they wanna do all of the major league, sports and your school sports and so on. If one young man dies, it's too many. They wouldn't get COVID anyway. Okay.
Now Clay told me to stop at 04:30. Okay. Keep going. We had a little time. Okay.
Teenage boys six times more likely to have their heart problems with this shot. Six times more like water. Okay. I'll tell you what we're doing. We are trying to kill off as far as I can tell.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
As Bill Gates buys up vast swathes of U.S. farmland, American farmer John Boyd implores everybody to start growing their own food, or buying locally from independent farmers, to ensure that their food is safe to eat. https://t.co/vdZ0YhefWp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Microsoft founder Bill Gates is the largest private owner of American farmland, with over 275,000 acres in 19 states. John Boyd Jr. says Gates’ land purchases are greed that runs America’s family farm off family land, noting, 'What farmer do you know that can pay that kind of money per acre' as prices reach '$1,520,000 dollars acre.' He argues Gates doesn't help communities and wants to reshape the food industry the way seeds were changed, 'and now he wants to to do that with beef,' opposing 'fake meat' and urging support for 'America's farmers.' He cites China buying farmland, saying, 'The Chinese own, the biggest pork processing plant,' and complains of 'no oversight from this administration.' Boyd urges Americans to 'start growing small plots of food in their backyard' and says, 'it just takes a few acres, and you can have your own food supply.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Microsoft founder Bill Gates is the largest private owner of American farmland. Gates alone holds over 275,000 acres across 19 states. National Black Farmers Association president John Boyd junior joins us now. John, so great to have you on. So I'm sure you put a lot of thought into this.
Why do you think Bill Gates is buying up all this land?
Speaker 1: Well, one one is greed, and, it's running America's family farm is off off family land. Basically, we can't buy the land, once Bill Gates moves into the area. For example, his, his his dad's son is right next door here. And since he's located in, Boynton, Virginia, land prices have went through the roof, $1,520,000 dollars acre. What farmer do you know that can pay that kind of money per acre Right.
You know, off off anything that we can grow on the farm? He doesn't do anything when he comes into these areas to support community based organizations or invest back into these communities. That's what's that's what's hurting America right now. Yeah. And what he's trying to do now in the food industry is the same thing, that they've done with seeds, you know, when they when they put genetically modified seeds in.
And and now he wants to to do that with, beef. But, you know, America's farmers are proud farmers, and I'm asking Americans not to support fake meat but to support farmers out here who grow, beef like I do and and poultry and and and pork. Support America's farmers and not support Bill Gates and this mega mega, theory and and mindset that he has.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It's really called greed.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. And and and by the way, it's not just Bill Gates. The Chinese, also gobbling up a lot of American farmland. You talked about pork.
The Chinese own, the biggest pork processing plant, Brazil does too, but China, I think, owns owns owns multiple of them. It's not good for our our economy, and it's not good for the small farmer. You know, I just I'm thinking about all of these these problems. Right? They're trying to push synthetic meat on us.
They're they're they're they're messing with the seeds as you talk about with these genetically modified seeds, And it doesn't appear that congress or government is doing enough to stop China from from buying the land, to stop Bill Gates from doing these things. So what should the people who are watching the show right now, how what should be their response? Should they be buying up land? Should they be learning to farm so that they can secure, you know, their own food supply for their own families?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I just visited, 39 townships around the country urging, small family farmers to start growing small plots of food in their backyard. Raise healthy foods that they know, that are safe to consume. And if you know if you grow it, and it tastes different from the the food that you buy in the supermarket. It's fresh.
It's good. It's wholesome. Those are the things that we're gonna have to do. And if you can afford a new Mercedes Benz or a Cadillac or SUV, you can afford five acres in the country, people. So start investing in rural America, start supporting small family farmers around there.
Guess what? They can start buying beef from a small scale farmer. You know, I've raised a 150 head of beef cattle here, and I can tell you right now, there's nothing fake about it, and I'm proud of the product that leaves Boyd Farm. And and all of our farmers right here in America feel the same way. And we see and right now, we're getting bullied by, China and and people like Bill Gates who are coming in to our area and and now you spoke about China.
They come into these auctions and they have someone bidding for them, and they and again, they are buying these farms at at auctions, running the prices through the roof Yeah. With no oversight from this administration. No. And there's been no oversight or or I've I've requested meetings time and time again on your show, to meet with the president and and and talk about these very, very important issues, and our request have what fell upon deaf ears.
Speaker 0: I think this is one of the most important issues facing America. I'm really glad you're drawing attention to it. It's also a health issue. It doesn't just taste better, John. It's better for you to eat natural and not all this synthetic stuff that Bill Gates and and wants to put down or even from these giant farm giant processing plants.
You're right. I I buy my pork. It might be from a local farmer near me. That's the way to do it. That's the safest, healthiest way.
John, thank you for for for coming, for bringing attention to this, but also reminding people it just takes a few acres, and you can have your own food supply.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
"When researchers studied the baby teeth of children with autism, they found higher levels of metal in them." "Baby teeth from children with autism had more toxic lead... when compared to the teeth of children without autism." https://t.co/qPg0StAxEL
Video Transcript AI Summary
A National Institutes of Health report found higher levels of metal in the baby teeth of children with autism. Researchers used lasers to analyze the teeth. Baby teeth from children with autism had more toxic lead and less zinc and manganese compared to children without autism.
The study suggests that exposure to metals in the months before and after birth, and how the body processes that exposure, may affect the risk of autism. The study is published in the journal Nature. Researchers say larger studies need to be done. Analyzing baby teeth might reveal environmental factors contributing to conditions like ADHD. Examining teeth could help trace environmental causes by identifying exposures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Report from the National Institutes of Health says that when researchers studied the baby teeth of children with autism, they found higher levels of metal in them, leading to the possibility, experts say, that while autism is likely beginning in the womb, what mom is exposed to in pregnancy may increase a child's risk. They studied these baby teeth, you can see in and around them, and they used lasers to find that out, to see what was in them and to show these differences. Now, here's what they found. Baby teeth from children with autism had more toxic lead and less of the essential nutrients needed for good health, such as zinc and manganese. This one compared to the teeth of children without autism.
They say in the months right before a child is born and right after a child is born, maybe when these children are exposed, and how the body processes that exposure to metal may affect the risk of autism. This study is published in the journal Nature. It's kind of interesting. Larger studies, they say, need to be done, but that means that you might be able to find out other things that contribute to, say, like ADHD. Right.
And you would see them just by checking baby teeth. It's hard to measure things from the environment. You know, we're all exposed to different things, but if you saw them in teeth, you could find out, you know, kind of was mom in a home where she got this, and maybe trace some of those environmental causes.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Remember when the entire planet became one giant insane asylum, practically overnight? https://t.co/Qf8mo7dAoH
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
How Pfizer duped billions of people using statistical manipulation. https://t.co/A2g94HQksO