reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @thematrixb0t
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
Epstein on tape advising former Israeli PM Barak to approach Palantir founder Peter Thiel. And there you have it https://t.co/vS6bnwz0WT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation references two cyber-security companies, Lookout and Palantir. Palantir is identified as Peter Thiel’s company, with a discussion about how to spell Thiel’s name and a note that one participant had never met Peter Thiel but knows he “sort of jumps around and acts like he’s on drugs,” followed by acknowledgment that Thiel would come to visit next week and that one person wanted to talk to him.
There is a concern or plan that Thiel could put the speaker on the board of Palantir, and a separate note that the speaker wanted to talk to Peter Thiel. The dialogue also mentions Andreessen Horowitz, described as a firm that pays Larry a million dollars a year to advise; the firm is spelled “Andreesen Horowitz” in the transcription, with “Andresen” or “Andresen Horowitz” variations around the spelling of the partners’ names. The speaker explains that Andreessen Horowitz is “the biggest venture capital people in Silicon Valley,” stating they are bigger than Sequoia or Kleiner Perkins, and referring to them as “the new Kleiner Perkins.” The characterization is that these are “the smart boys” in the field.
The conversation closes with an abrupt remark about “those two companies” and a plan that, in the next three weeks, there is a need to make decisions if someone is going to leave. The dialogue emphasizes the prestige and influence of Andreessen Horowitz in Silicon Valley, positioning them as dominant venture capital players and implying strategic importance around involvement or board placement related to Palantir and possibly other ventures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He he thought there was two cyber companies, Lookout and even though I know Peter I've never met Peter Thiel. And everybody says he sort of jumps around and acts like he's on drugs.
Speaker 1: Smoking. Yeah. Yeah. He looks
Speaker 2: under drugs. However, he has
Speaker 0: a company called Palantir, p a l l e n, t e t I e r. Palantir is Peter Thiel's company. And look out
Speaker 1: Palantir, p a l a n t I e r? Yes. How do you write Thiele? T h I e l l y?
Speaker 0: H I e l. L l y? No. P t h I e l l. Okay.
So he thought that Peter would put you on the board of Palantir. Peter Thiel is one of the best I've never met him. He's gonna come here next week.
Speaker 2: Oh. So I
Speaker 0: wanted to talk to him.
Speaker 2: I wanted to talk to you. Okay.
Speaker 0: He and Andreessen. It's called Andreessen Horowitz. Andreessen Horowitz, they pay Larry a million dollars a year. Just to advise Andres and a n d r e e s o n, Andresen at Horowitz. And Howood?
H o r o, Horowitz.
Speaker 1: What they are? They're lobbyists. What what they are doing?
Speaker 0: They are the biggest venture capital people in Silicon Valley.
Speaker 1: But bigger than Sequoia or Klan of
Speaker 0: These are the these are the new Klinger Perkins. Everybody these are the smart boys. Mhmm. So those two companies right away, in terms of I said that we need in the next three weeks if you're gonna leave.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
Natural or manmade? AIDS US-Patent 5676977 H1N1 US-Patent 8835624 Ebola US-Patent 20120251502 Swine Flu US-Patent CA2741523 A1 BSE US-Patent 0070031450 A1 ZIKA ATTC VR-84 (Rockefeller Foundation) SARS US-patent 7897744 & 8506968 CORONAVIRUS US-Patent 10130701
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe how Windows updates secretly enable OneDrive, moving your files to Microsoft servers instead of backing up. Your computer becomes a temporary access point, and turning OneDrive off or deleting files to “free up space” erases them everywhere. The only escape is a buried menu or a tutorial. Millions clicked Update unaware, and this practice can feel like malware, with files disappearing and warnings like “Where are my files?” appearing.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
MICROSOFT CAN ERASE YOUR ENTIRE COMPUTER! A man is going viral after exposing what millions of Windows users are just now realizing about Bill Gates’ Microsoft. "I think they should have to go to jail for this." Windows updates quietly turn on OneDrive without a plain English warning. Your files don’t get “backed up.” They get moved. Your computer becomes a temporary access point. Microsoft’s servers become the primary copy. Then the trap snaps shut. People report: • Family photos gone • Work files wiped • Years of data erased • Clean desktops with no warning • A little icon asking: “Where are my files?” Many thought it was ransomware. It wasn’t. Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally. Deleting files to “free up space” deletes them everywhere. The only way out? A buried menu… or a YouTube tutorial. Nowhere does it clearly say: “We are transferring your entire computer to our servers.” Millions clicked “Update” without knowing this was included. If a company can silently take control of your files and delete them with one wrong click - how is this not malware?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Windows includes a piece of malware called OneDrive that will spontaneously delete all files on the user's local computer without warning, confirmation, or any prompt to opt out. They describe a process where, during a Windows update, OneDrive starts automatically, begins uploading everything on the computer to Microsoft servers, and then the user may be alerted that the system is running out of space. When the user attempts to turn off OneDrive backup, they find that all local files have already been deleted, and only a desktop icon with the message “Where are my files?” remains.
The user explains that many people who encounter this assume they have been hit by ransomware or a virus, because OneDrive provides a message claiming that “all of your life’s work is now on our machine” while having deleted it from the user’s machine without asking. To restore files, users are forced to download the many gigabytes back onto their machine, which is particularly burdensome for those on slow or metered connections.
When users attempt to delete files from OneDrive, the system deletes them from Microsoft servers and also from the local computer again, without warning. The only way to delete files from their machine without removing them from Microsoft servers is to follow a YouTube tutorial detailing specific steps.
The speaker emphasizes that there is no intuitive way to stop OneDrive from doing this; the options to disable it are buried in menus and do not clearly explain what they do. There is no plain English explanation that OneDrive will take everything on the computer and put it on Microsoft’s machine. The issue is described as widespread enough that people are familiar with cloud storage, but OneDrive is framed as the cloud making the machine’s files primary, with the local machine acting only as temporary access. As a result, if anything happens to the file on OneDrive’s machine, it is deleted everywhere because there is no independent copy.
The speaker notes that this behavior slows down the machine, since data is uploaded and downloaded to the cloud rather than written to or read from the local hard drive. They question how this was allowed to be released and why no one intervened to stop it, expressing disbelief at the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they should have to go to jail for this. I'm only barely joking here. If you're unaware, for the last few years, Windows has come with a piece of malware called OneDrive, and OneDrive, if you're not careful, will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer. Not on their computer on OneDrive, I mean off of your machine, the one that's in your house. If you have been fortunate enough to not have your life ruined by OneDrive, just Google that word and you will find a torrent of people saying, It took everything.
All of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone. OneDrive will not give you any warning whatsoever that it is about to do this. It will not give you a confirmation button to hit. It will not give you a pop up or anything. Here's how it happens.
At some point, your Windows computer will update to start using OneDrive. At no point in the process will you be given any kind of a plain language warning to opt out of it. It will just start doing it. Then at some point, you will notice that it is quietly uploading everything on your computer to Microsoft servers. Some of you will only notice this because you're on a slow or metered Internet connection and it's trying to upload 40 gigabytes of video and work files and private records.
Or you may have only found out when OneDrive gave you a warning that it was running out of space. So you will look up how do I make it stop doing that and you will find the option to turn off OneDrive backup. Then you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone. Everything on your computer was deleted by Microsoft. And on your desktop, completely clean of icons, will be one cheeky little icon that says, Where are my files?
Many, many people who saw this assumed they had been hit by a ransomware attack or a virus where some hacker has stolen all of their data and is now holding it hostage. So you click on that icon and it says, Don't worry, all of your life's work is now on our machine. We helpfully deleted it from your machine without ever asking you. But we're still not at the worst part because at this point you'll be forced to download all of your stuff back to your machine. Again, God help you if you're on a slow or metered internet connection because you now have to grab the many gigabytes of work and slowly bring it back.
At which point you will say, Okay, Microsoft, I don't want you to have my files. I want to delete them off of OneDrive. So on your local computer, you will have all of the files on your local machine now, then it will show where those files are also on OneDrive. So you will go into OneDrive and you will delete them, only to find that when you delete them off of Microsoft servers, they go in and delete them off your computer again with no warning, with no pop up, without anything. The only way to delete the files off their machine without also deleting them off of your machine is to go find a YouTube tutorial walking through the detailed steps on how to do it.
To be absolutely clear, to make OneDrive not do this requires looking it up. There is no intuitive way to do it. They intentionally buried those options in the menus and none of those options say in plain English what they do. At no point in any of this does it come out and say in plain English, Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead? If it did say that, everyone would say no.
They realize this. The issue is that by now everybody is familiar with the concept of storing files on the cloud. Lots of machines offer the cloud as a backup if you want. You would assume that that's what OneDrive is. It's a chance to back up your files in case something happens to your local machine, but that is not what it is.
OneDrive secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files. When you work on your local machine, they treat it as you temporarily accessing those files. This, of course, massively slows down your machine because instead of writing and reading data to your hard drive, you're having to upload and download it to the cloud. What this means in practice is if anything happens to the file on their machine, it's deleted everywhere because you no longer have it.
It's only on their machine. You're just allowed to temporarily access it. And at no point anywhere do they explain in plain language that this is what they're doing. It is so unintuitive that it is very easy to accidentally delete everything you have everywhere. Do you understand when OneDrive says that it's full and you go in to delete some things to free up space, it deletes it from your machine, too?
I genuinely cannot believe that this was allowed to go out the door like this or that nobody else stepped in to stop them.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe confirms that Netanyahu is blackmailing Donald Trump: "American Government is trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein was one of their tools to trap them." https://t.co/rtt1RZiWgt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the American government is trapped by the Israelis, using Jeffrey Epstein as a tool to constrain and manipulate U.S. leaders. He claims Epstein was used to trap multiple presidents and influence policy, stating, “Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak met Arafat in the nineties, and there was no deal. The reason was Epstein. They were being blackmailed by Epstein.” He adds that Ehud Barak, then Israeli prime minister, was also “a friend of Epstein” but was blackmailed by the Israeli right wing, and that this pressure stopped a potential two-state solution with Arafat. He asserts Epstein’s leverage extended beyond sex to financial concerns, questioning, “Where was the money coming from?” and contends that the Gaza issue is the focal point of much of the obstruction. He cites Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal reporting a birthday card Trump sent to Epstein as evidence of ties, and claims that Israelis have compromised the American government through Epstein and related past events. He also states that “I don’t think Trump wants to continue this war or the genocide” and that Israelis are inhibiting him.
Speaker 1 asks what Dershowitz’s denial suggests, prompting Speaker 0 to elaborate with broader conspiracy implications, suggesting that Israeli influence has shaped U.S. policy and history, including why peace deals or normalization efforts may have stalled.
Speaker 1 questions why those in power would use Epstein instead of other drastic measures like assassination, referencing theories about John F. Kennedy’s assassination and noting the possibility of broader intelligence involvement. He proposes that the GCC countries could leverage financial power to supplant traditional APAC lobbying in influencing U.S. policy and asks whether Trump could mobilize Arab world and BRICS power to end what is described as genocide.
Speaker 0 answers that Trump could end the genocide “right now” if he stops fearing the Israelis, urging him to disregard accusations about his ethics, “Let them say whatever they say. He should stop the genocide. Let them do whatever they wanna do. Morality should take over.” He compares the Israeli pressure to historical leverage, asking Trump to act in the interest of the United States and the Middle East.
Speaker 1 references Robert Maxwell as an example of Israeli intimidation, noting the dangers of challenging them. Speaker 0 closes by reiterating hope that Trump will prioritize U.S. and Middle East interests and “do the right thing.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe that the American government is sort of trapped by the Israelis. Jeffrey Epstein is one of their tools to trap them.
Speaker 1: And what do you think of Dershowitz's denial?
Speaker 0: I'd like to give you an hold on a second. I wanna give you an example. Bill Clinton, president Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak met Arafat in the nineties, and there was no deal. The reason was Epstein. They were being blackmailed by Epstein.
Ehud Barak was also a friend of Epstein, the the prime minister of Israel at the time. But he was being blackmailed by the Israeli right wing as well. And they stopped an agreement with Arafat. They were about to reach an agreement there for a two state solution, but that was stopped because of Epstein. They were both being blackmailed by Epstein.
Speaker 1: And so Jeffrey Epstein, a way, presumably being used as a tool by the Israelis, helped to change
Speaker 0: the course of history in this region I'm speaking to you from? Of course. A change I think and they trapped a number of US presidents by using Jeffrey Epstein. And it wasn't only about sex. It was also the money issue.
Where was the money coming from? But everything is stuck over Gazelle. And I believe the Israelis have the American government captive due to what happened what happens with Epstein or what happened in the past with Epstein. Rupert Rupert Murdoch newspaper, Wall Street Journal put out that card or something, birthday card Trump sent to Epstein. Where do you think they got it from?
And I again, I don't think Trump wants to continue this war or the genocide. I think it's the Israelis holding him back.
Speaker 1: Given how much maverick power he has to create peace in South North Korea, Palestine, in all these different places. One might ask, why do they need Jeffrey Epstein? Why can't they just assassinate Donald Trump? I know there's a lot of speculation. There has been that John f Kennedy was assassinated with Israeli intelligence help.
Why do they need things like Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 0: Somebody tried to assassinate him, didn't they? Before he became before the election. It doesn't always work. I I'm not sure what what's going to happen because, you know, people look at these pictures of starving children all over the world. And there's a lot of pressure on these politicians to say enough, to tell them enough is enough.
I'm not sure how far this will go. And I think the Israelis are committing harakiri on the themselves or by doing this because eventually they will be stopped.
Speaker 1: Now that is where the GCC countries arguably can leverage financial power to replace APAC lobbying power as it were. Do you believe that Trump can begin to leverage some of that Arab world global South, BRICS world power to be able to end the genocide?
Speaker 0: No. I believe that he can end the genocide right now if if he just stops being scared of the Israelis. What are they gonna say about him? How many girls did he abuse? How many billions of dollars he took?
Let them say whatever they say. He should stop the genocide. Let them do whatever they wanna do. Morality should take over. I encourage him to stop the genocide at any price.
Speaker 1: Robert Maxwell was a incredibly intelligent man. He was trying to leverage things against the Israeli state, perhaps financial deals for his company. Look what happened to him. Can't the Israelis every time tell Trump, you try and mess with us? Someone is clever and people can look up Robert Maxwell's heroic wartime record.
They can they can still kill you.
Speaker 0: I can't comment about that, but but but I hope Donald Trump will have the interest of The United States and The Middle East at heart and do the right thing.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
James O'Keefe catches a journalist on hidden camera admitting he’s an undercover informant for the FBI acting against conservative organizations. “I have a thousand sources in the DOJ and CIA” https://t.co/TOwObQMrZJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on Matthew Tierman, a former Project Veritas board member, and a leader of numerous provocative claims and confrontations documented over a recent period. The participants describe Tierman as having a long history of intense and sometimes violent rhetoric toward James O’Keefe and others, and they present a narrative in which Tierman asserts deep involvement with and access to multiple federal law enforcement offices.
Key remarks and claims include:
- Tierman allegedly told an undercover journalist that he “fed the Southern District tons of shit” about James O’Keefe and others to try to get them imprisoned. He also claimed to have been an FBI informant and to have spoken with the SDNY, the FBI, the DOJ, and the IRS, asserting he had “thousands of sources in the Department of Justice and the CIA” and that he spent his days trying to “play stories about corruption.”
- He is quoted saying he has worked with law enforcement on various topics and that he has fed the SDNY “tons of shit.” He also claimed he was on an “enemies list” at the DOJ and warned of a potential “perp-w walk” in October, which did not come to pass.
- Tierman asserted he has access to and engages with legacy media to target conservative figures and claimed involvement with figures like Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, and Don Jr. He alleged Don Jr. has engaged in insider trading and “crypto schemes” to bribe foreign governments, and he stated that his mission for the next two years is to “make sure [Don Jr.] ends up in prison” because he believes Don Jr. has “stolen a billion dollars from the American people.”
- He described a broad, cross-ideological network, claiming to be “on all sides” and to talk to the New York Times and National Review, suggesting he negotiates or interacts with diverse media outlets to pursue stories.
- The narrative includes a dramatic incident in which Tierman allegedly shot at a book belonging to James O’Keefe, bragging that he wanted to kill him. The discussion references a “bullet right through my heart” inscription in the book and a confrontation in Miami Beach where undercover reporters approached Tierman to verify his statements about wanting to kill O’Keefe.
- The participants recount a prior board meeting on February 6, three years earlier, during which Tierman allegedly threatened to “carve my heart out and eat it” in reference to James O’Keefe. They describe how Veritas used remaining funds in litigation against O’Keefe and how, after his termination, he allegedly sought to involve law enforcement to restrain or arrest him.
- Tierman allegedly described his investment ambitions, stating he aims to accumulate “a hundred million dollars” to “weaponize money” and to operate in investment banking to wield financial power, citing industry figures such as Paul Singer as a point of comparison. He claimed to have a broker license and to be involved with several investment entities, including Petragen and Cathayed Incorporated, and he discussed NDA restrictions and conflicts of interest related to his activities while on the Veritas board.
- The interview mentions the involvement of George Scackel and the notion that Petragen could be sold to big pharma; it also references a prior defamation suit and ongoing disputes with Veritas, including accusations of misappropriating funds and other misconduct.
- The reporters tease that Tierman admitted to working with SDNY and the FBI, and that they intend to pursue further discovery, noting threats and violent imagery used by Tierman toward O’Keefe. They emphasize the dramatic, ongoing tension between Tierman and James O’Keefe, culminating in the live confrontation in Miami and a broader dossier of alleged informant activity.
Overall, the piece presents Tierman’s allegations about informant activity, his alleged violent rhetoric toward O’Keefe, his plans to monetize and weaponize money, and his disputes with Project Veritas and its leadership, all culminating in a charged confrontation on the street in Miami.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But don't you feel bad because he was your friend?
Speaker 1: I would kill him because
Speaker 2: he is one of the most evil people I've ever known. So this guy
Speaker 3: shot up my book and bragged that he wants to kill me. There's a bullet right through my heart.
Speaker 2: The second I saw him in shot, I wished that was my immediate first reaction was why couldn't it have been obese? A thousand sources of the DOJ and CIA I talk to all the
Speaker 0: time. Okay.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern Dirt for tons of shit to try and get him in prison.
Speaker 3: So could you tell us the truth about who you fed dirt to to SDNY? And that you're you're a rat. You're an FBI informant.
Speaker 4: No. I because I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 2: I've already fed the Southern District tons of shit on them.
Speaker 3: Could you tell us more about how you said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY?
Speaker 4: About you?
Speaker 3: Who did you feed SDNY information? You you went to the FBI, Matt. You're a rat.
Speaker 2: Are the most evil motherfucker I am.
Speaker 3: But I'm not a rat.
Speaker 4: You know who I've talked to about all of your criminal Everybody who would listen, the IRS and other agencies.
Speaker 3: So you did go to the FBI.
Speaker 4: I have talked to many people who have called
Speaker 2: me from law enforcement agencies.
Speaker 3: When did you feed the Southern District Of New
Speaker 4: York tons of shit, Matthew? Called me and asked me questions about you. I answered them truthfully and honestly. So
Speaker 3: we have Matt Tiramana's on tape admitting to be an FBI informant. He's the first time breaking news. This is pretty nuts. Wouldn't you agree?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, that's my property.
Speaker 3: This doesn't look good for you, bro. You shot me in the heart. You say you wanna kill me. I mean, lot of people find that pretty concerning. You said when Charlie Kirk died, you wished Property that night.
No. No. We're gonna we're gonna file a restraining order against you. So is that projection? I'm Is that My property.
No. That's my book. Don't tell If you if you touch me, we have security and they're gonna Matt? My property. Matt?
Three years ago on February 6, I was indefinitely suspended from Project Veritas. We've done a few reports to you about Project Veritas in front of the logo that we have on this wall. But this one might be the biggest report of them all. It's about one of the former board members, a man named Matthew Thiermond. The six hour board meeting recorded on February 6 defies all explanation.
There was picture of me nailed to the cross, the allegation I stole a pregnant lady sandwich, the board's contention that me taking black cars instead of an Uber x was somehow a fraudulent expenditure. But donors pleaded with me to hire private security, while the board, including Matthew Tierman, believed that spending money on this personal security was a form of financial misappropriation. Matthew Tierman also said he wanted to, quote, carve my heart out and eat it.
Speaker 4: I said I you I wanna carve out his heart and eat it in front of
Speaker 2: him. Okay. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Yeah. That was a quote.
Speaker 3: Now we had reason to believe that some on the board went to the New York district attorney to try to get me arrested. After the board fired me, the board used the millions of dollars left in the bank to sue me, brought me to the SDNY to get a civil injunction against me to try to stop me from continuing to do any investigative journalism at all. We've previously reported to you, but we did not know how dark and sinister all this could become. A citizen reached out to me after running into Matthew Tierramond on the street in Miami and then spoke to him over the course of four months. What struck the citizen was that Matthew Tierramond relayed to her that the whole world is a fraud except him.
Speaker 2: The whole world is a fraud.
Speaker 0: So that means you're a fraud too?
Speaker 2: No. The world around us.
Speaker 0: Why is everybody else a fraud but not you?
Speaker 2: Oh, well, check my behavior. Call everybody out and I'm happy to take ownership of any of my boy list.
Speaker 3: This citizen journalist decided to record Tiraman. And in these conversations, Tiraman describes repeatedly how he wants to kill James O'Keefe, invests in pharmaceutical companies that he can't talk about, but he proceeds to talk about, and says that he acted as an informant to the SDNY. That's an acronym for Southern District of New York, which is also a metonym for the US attorney's office, federal prosecutors there, and the FBI to dish out dirt on conservative organizations in order to get them in prison. So now we present to you the rest of the story about Matthew Tiermond, including my interaction with him on the evening of Friday night, February sixth, the three year anniversary of my termination from Project Veritas.
Speaker 2: For about a year or two, I was carrying everywhere I go.
Speaker 0: Where? Here. Okay.
Speaker 2: But that was because not because of protocol, was because of the bullshit I was getting nationally.
Speaker 0: Woah. What bullshit?
Speaker 2: The O'Keeffe stuff.
Speaker 0: What happened? Like, why were you with? Like, threats?
Speaker 4: Oh, yeah. Tons.
Speaker 2: Was called I the FBI became an enemy of the mainstream right. I helped build a lot of these people. Gavin Waxman, New Yorker Republicans. Benny Johnson, I used to host him all the time. Charlie I've known since he was 19.
I disliked Charlie, because he was totally corrupt. Even the righties, they're corrupt. So I've had my issue with Charlie, but we we ended the time we never fought until the O'Keeffe shit.
Speaker 3: Thiermond also reveals that he's been acting as an informant to the SDNY, the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the IRS with hopes of taking down various conservative figures which he deems to be corrupt. Thierman claims he has thousands of sources in the Department of Justice and the CIA and quote, this is what I do all day.
Speaker 2: I have a thousand sources in DOJ and CIA I talk to all the time. Okay. And military intel and every agency. I mean, is what I do all day. I spent my day to day trying to play stories about corruption.
I won't tell you exactly about who and what side, but I spoke to the New York Times and I spoke to National Review. I'm on all sides.
Speaker 3: Thierman says he's on all sides. Thierman doesn't tell us all the people he went to the SDNY on. But what he does say is that he was getting special treatment from the DOJ in the form of a courtesy warning that he was on some type of, quote, enemies list.
Speaker 2: Last year, ahead of the election, I had phone calls from DOJ sources telling me that I was on a enemies list that was gonna get perkwashed in.
Speaker 0: Is that like a threat or they were warning you? Oh, they
Speaker 2: were warning you. I had a friend who happened to be at the DOJ at a deputy At the end who called me and said on a Friday night at midnight and said, like, dude, you're on a fucking list. You're gonna get perp blocked in October. And it didn't happen because what happened in between then?
Speaker 3: We're not sure what, quote, happened in between then, but Thierrymond also says that, quote, he has fed the SDNY tons of shit.
Speaker 2: I've got him dead to rights on so much fraud. I've already fed the southern district tons of shit. Him. I've done more. Yeah.
And I'm one of I'm not special. I would just think I'm more than special,
Speaker 4: but he's a fucking scumbag.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern District tons of shit to try and get him in prison. But
Speaker 3: Tehran says the SDNY is all about power, something that Thierman says he is especially interested in.
Speaker 2: And the Southern District especially perniciously is all about power.
Speaker 3: Thierman also describes how there are no bad FBI agents.
Speaker 2: I've worked with the field offices around the country for many, many years. They're all awesome people. I have never met a single bad, malicious, coercive FBI agent in a field office anywhere in the country. They're all freaking awesome.
Speaker 3: What's striking about that is the FBI raided multiple Project Veritas journalists while Thierrymond was on the board of Project Veritas in November 2021. And Thierrymond expressed at the time to everybody in the newsroom that he was opposed to the actions of those FBI agents, Somehow now, he's never met a bad FBI agent. Recall that the affidavit of the probable cause of that FBI raid remains completely redacted line by line. Behind those black lines are the sources, methods, and individuals that the SDNY spoke with. Then, Thierman describes working with legacy media organizations to take down conservative figures, including the New York Times, Project which Veritas had a defamation lawsuit against.
Speaker 2: I'm working with the New York Times right now. Do I wanna work with the New York Times? Of course not. They're lefties. But if they're gonna go after the truth of what's going on here, then okay.
Speaker 0: And what's going on? Like, what are you what's going on?
Speaker 2: Don Junior's insider trading and defrauding the entire system. Steven Wittkopf, Howard, Ludnick. I usually call him Ludnick.
Speaker 3: Tirman specifically mentions Donald Trump junior in claims that Don junior is engaged in insider trading and using his position to execute crypto schemes with foreign governments to bribe Trump. Now we haven't verified this, but we're showing you what claiming in this interaction. And that Tiramis main mission is to make sure that Donald Trump Junior ends up in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Don junior is a little annoyed
Speaker 0: with him. Yeah. But he's
Speaker 2: Fuck Don junior. He's been fucking stealing mill money by the billions. My one of my missions for the next two years is to make sure he ends up in prison.
Speaker 0: Why? Because
Speaker 2: he's stolen a fucking billion dollars from the American people. It's an absolute fucking grifter. He's insuring trading SPAC announcements. He's doing crypto schemes to get foreign governments to pay his crypto platform to bribe the president.
Speaker 3: So as concerning as all that sounded, nothing prepared us for what Thierryman would say repeatedly. He proudly and shamelessly says over and over again that he wants to kill me.
Speaker 2: And I shared the depo with, like, all the people that knew, people who I worked with at TV or worked for me at TV. We have a alumni boot chat of all of us who've been through this fucking shit.
Speaker 0: But don't you feel bad because he was your friend?
Speaker 1: I would kill him because he is one of the most
Speaker 2: evil people I've ever known. He is a true narcissist sociopath.
Speaker 3: It's ironic that Tirman refers to me as a sociopath because this next statement is perhaps the most heartless thing a person can say. Thiermon claims that when he saw Charlie Kirk was murdered, he wished it was me.
Speaker 2: I got multiple people who know me well and know my relations with Charlie and gave messaged me after Charlie was shot and said, be honest. When he was shot, did you not for a second wish that it was James? And I've honestly responded to every one of those people. The second I saw him in shock, I wish that was my immediate first reaction was why couldn't it have been okay?
Speaker 3: Thierman says he wants to make $100,000,000 to weaponize money through investment banking. He actually says the investment banking he does is a form of theft, stealing.
Speaker 2: I'm in a stage of life where I'm going to weaponize money.
Speaker 0: How are you gonna do that?
Speaker 2: Make a shit ton of money. So and then weaponize it. You know? And I know how to weaponize it because I've been in this whole fucking milieu. I know the donors.
I know the foundations. I know how to do it. Right now, I think my highest best use of time and power is making a $100,000,000 to weaponize money better than anyone.
Speaker 0: So And how are you gonna do that? Teach me this financial secret. The old fashioned way. What's the old fashioned way?
Speaker 2: You're gonna steal it.
Speaker 0: No. Really? What do you do? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Invest for banking. Oh.
Speaker 3: Matt is a broker licensed through FINRA, the financial industry regulatory authority. He claims he wants to weaponize the money against the entire system in the same way that Paul Singer does.
Speaker 2: I have a very aggressive venture portfolio and investment banking business, and I'm making a lot of money. And I am looking to make a lot more money to the point that I can weaponize the entire system the way Paul Singer does, but my way. So that's my goal.
Speaker 3: Thiermond acts as an adviser, and he solicits investments for a variety of companies, some of which are in the pharmaceutical space and some of which he solicited investments while on the board of Project Veritas. These companies include Cathayed Incorporated, Matt Thiermond LLC, and a company called ClaimFound. Thiermond's broker check report shows that he is currently employed by and registered with something called Bradley Woods and Co registered on 3rd Street in New York. Last week, Tirman says in text messages with the undercover journal that one of the companies was about to get FDA approval. He asked her for luck tomorrow because on that day, the company which does gene therapy and therapeutics data targeting was submitting a timeline to the FDA.
In another text message, Tirman describes how he's not allowed to talk about any of this. Quote, restricted during the terms of engagement where sensitive information can be used by those without the same fiduciary responsibility. He says he has a quote target on his back because of politics, l o l. The undercover journalist asks, what's the name of the pharmaceutical company? And Thierman says he can't discuss this over text.
But Thierman later identifies the name of the company in person so that it isn't in writing. Thierman says he could, quote, lose his licenses and, quote, face civil and criminal penalties levied.
Speaker 2: But I will dose you. I'm like a doctor. I do I trade health care stocks.
Speaker 0: That's sweet of you. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I'm a sweet guy.
Speaker 0: It's not that serious that you tell me which company it is.
Speaker 4: Not a text yeah. I cited NDA.
Speaker 0: Oh. I can't
Speaker 2: fucking text it to you. Like, I've got a fucking company that I literally
Speaker 4: have an investment banking mandate where I'm under NDA on everything they do because they're in stealth mode.
Speaker 2: So yeah. And if I told you about it, you wouldn't have heard of it anyway. It's called Petrogen. But I can't text it because one day in court
Speaker 0: Of course. I get it.
Speaker 4: That will, like, end up, like, I'll
Speaker 2: lose my license. I'll have criminal and civil torts. Like so that's
Speaker 3: just cumbersome. This deck shows what the company, Petragen, does, commercializes therapeutics for periodontal disease. The deck for Petragen lists some of the people involved, including a few doctors and this CEO. What's interesting about Tirman's mention of Petragen is the same company Petragen was named by George Scackel in a videotaped deposition in federal court between myself and Project Veritas, the company I founded. George Scackel also was a member of the board of Project Veritas, and George Scackel says that Petrogen could be sold to a big pharma like Pfizer.
Speaker 2: Three of the four companies you've invested in, you would consider to be in the medical field. Hydrogen could be sold to a big pharma. Like Pfizer. Pfizer. Remember,
Speaker 3: Project Veritas was investigating Pfizer right when they indefinitely suspended me three years ago this week.
Speaker 2: We're exploring, like, now you know how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we can put up a completely unequally developed new vaccines. Right? So we have to do that if we're gonna do that, though, that's a risk to, like as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating fucking viruses.
Speaker 3: And both Matthew Thiermond and George Scackel signed a conflict of interest policy with the board of directors where they should have disclosed their investments in a company like Petrogen or any other company that George Scackel mentioned under oath.
Speaker 2: How do you define conflict of interest? Oh, I don't know. Give me a dictionary and I'll read you the definition.
Speaker 3: Tirman also mentions our documentary, The Truth Inside Veritas, and theorizes that I would release the sequel on the three year anniversary of February 6, just last Friday. That was the three anniversary of the board meeting where they officially ousted
Speaker 2: He's already tweeted a couple times and did videos that he's gonna be doing another episode of this documentary series. And he was supposed to release it, I guess, couple weeks ago.
Speaker 4: He didn't. I know what he's doing. He's saving it for the third anniversary of the board meeting where he was ousted in a code.
Speaker 0: And when is that?
Speaker 2: September 6, my birthday. So it all dovetails. If somebody, like, put a gun to my head and said, what's the most fun memorable day of your life?
Speaker 4: I'd probably say that day.
Speaker 3: Little did Thierry know, we had something else planned for that evening. James O'Keefe here in Miami Beach. We're outside the Cardozo Hotel on a Friday night about to meet up with Matthew Thiermond, investment banker, former Project Verodas board member. He's been meeting with our undercover journalist for the last three months. And one of the things that we discovered is he had shot up my book.
Looks like he missed and then he shot me right to the heart. And then, and you see the exit wound on the other side. So this guy shot up my book and bragged to our undercover that he wants to kill me.
Speaker 1: I would kill him because he is one
Speaker 2: of the most evil people I've ever known.
Speaker 3: So we're about to go talk to him and ask him about about that.
Speaker 2: So how long does it take to get you in and out of that courtroom? Fifteen seconds. Okay.
Speaker 4: Fully noted.
Speaker 3: The undercover journalist got up and left the table, and I showed up. We had to make sure that Tyrarmont was not armed.
Speaker 2: For about a year or two, I was carrying everywhere I go.
Speaker 3: The undercover hugged him, checked to make sure there was no weapon or gun, and then we approached in Miami Beach. As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for thou art with me. Thy rod and thy staff, comfort me. Prayer to Saint Michael, archangel, in the name of the father and the son and the holy ghost, most glorious prince of the heavenly armies, Saint Michael the archangel, defend us in our battle against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places. Defend us in our battle against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.
Ephesians six twelve. Hey, is this seat taken? So for the last few months, the person you've been talking to actually works for me. What's that? Every text message you sent, that person actually works for me.
So we're doing a story about how how you said you wanted to kill me.
Speaker 2: I didn't say I wanted to kill you. I said metaphorically, would carve out your heart and eat it referencing as in the depo tape Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. You
Speaker 3: sure about that? You sure about that? Yeah. You said you wanted to murder me. You wanted to kill me.
Speaker 2: Well, I think you're evil as fuck, so I think that
Speaker 3: Did you say you wanted to kill me? A moment ago, you said you didn't say that. Did you say it?
Speaker 1: I don't recall. I would kill him.
Speaker 3: Quote, I would kill James O'Keefe.
Speaker 2: It's metaphoric. I wouldn't physically kill you. If I was physically gonna kill you, I'd kill you.
Speaker 3: Did you physically put a bullet through my heart in a book?
Speaker 2: I had to do some target practice ahead of deer season, and that was what was around for Target.
Speaker 3: You didn't seem like a very good shot.
Speaker 4: No. I'm a pretty good shot.
Speaker 3: Alright. Looks like you missed the first time around. You your your bullet went up there. What was it? Seven feet, seven yards, 15 yards?
Speaker 2: Well, so that's theft. Yeah. That's my property.
Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a bullet right through my heart. That's a that's a threat.
Speaker 2: No. It's
Speaker 3: not. Oh, you don't think so?
Speaker 2: No. It's not. Okay.
Speaker 3: Well, you shot you shot me in the heart. You say you wanna kill me. You I've got some more tape. You said when Charlie Kirk died, you wished Property by the way. No.
No. We're gonna we're gonna file a restraining order against you. We're gonna file a restraining order against you. A criminal restraining order.
Speaker 2: Suing you
Speaker 3: soon. I look forward to discovery. That'll be exciting.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Yeah. And you said that Charlie Kirk was corrupt. That was a direct quote.
Speaker 2: Yes. I dislike Charlie because he was totally corrupt.
Speaker 3: He messaged me after Charlie Kirk was shot and said, be honest, when Charlie Kirk was shot, did you not for a second wish it was James O'Keefe?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Many many people did message me that day.
Speaker 3: Why couldn't it have been James O'Keefe?
Speaker 2: Because you are the most evil motherfucker I know.
Speaker 3: But I'm not a rat, and you went to the FBI. You also said that you were a confidential informant to the Southern District Of New York. That's one of the other things you said to me.
Speaker 2: That's why I fed the Southern District tons of shit to try and get them in prison. But
Speaker 3: You said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY. Could you could you tell us about that?
Speaker 2: Talking to you? Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: I'm a
Speaker 4: 100% fine. Oh, This
Speaker 3: is Could you could you tell us more about how you said you were a confidential informant to the SDNY? About you? You mentioned a number of folks. You talked about you mentioned Tucker Carlson. You mentioned you tell me who you mentioned because we have it all on tape.
And you're you're a rat. You're an FBI informant.
Speaker 2: Okay. So you're gonna have to be more specific. I've never talked
Speaker 3: We have everything on tape.
Speaker 2: Why about him. So
Speaker 3: You said that you talked to the SDNY. Can you tell us more about that?
Speaker 4: No. I because I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 3: Who did you feed SDNY information? You you went to the FBI, Matt. You're a rat. You rat it on someone to SDNY. I wanna know who it is.
Answer the question.
Speaker 2: I have
Speaker 3: You know who you rat it on. Tell us tell us who it is. So it says so it says it says I would kill. Would you kill me?
Speaker 4: It's a fucking part of part of speech. Do I think you are an evil scumbag? Yes.
Speaker 3: Yeah. This is pretty nuts. Wouldn't you agree?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, that's my property.
Speaker 3: This doesn't look good for you, bro. You're shoot you're shooting someone in the heart? You wanna carve my heart out and eat it? You
Speaker 4: that is a Are you
Speaker 3: in are you in love with me?
Speaker 4: I'm not the guy who's hooking up with dudes.
Speaker 3: Because you're so so is that projection?
Speaker 0: I'm
Speaker 3: gonna Is that my property. No. That's my book. No. It's not your If you touch me, we have security, and they're gonna Matt?
Speaker 2: My property.
Speaker 4: Matt? I will see you in court for that.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: So Okay. I gotta go get my Uber. But You know,
Speaker 4: you wanna walk with me?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Will. Yeah. Well, you had phone calls from the DOJs. Get up here, buddy.
Speaker 2: No. She we're
Speaker 3: here with Matthew Tierra man who has admitted that he went to the SDNY. He he's kinda being very evasive about it. But he did say that he did give information to SDNY. He said he was feeding them tons of shit. Do you know it's a crime?
Well, we'll wait till he pays the bill. He was gonna walk away without paying his bill.
Speaker 0: Oh, man.
Speaker 3: You know it's a crime to lie to the FBI?
Speaker 4: I love how you spin everything.
Speaker 3: So did I spin everything while I was at Project Veritas?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Hold on. Hold right here. It's like Did
Speaker 3: I spin everything at Project Veritas? I worked there for ten, thirteen years. Was it all a lie?
Speaker 4: You spun a lot of shit.
Speaker 3: What what videos were fake at Project Veritas?
Speaker 4: What you used to do was everybody else would do the work, and then you would helicopter in in between show tunes LARPing festivals.
Speaker 3: You attended a musical in Oklahoma, didn't you? You attended Actually,
Speaker 4: that was the one talented thing that
Speaker 2: you did. You were actually
Speaker 3: quite that very much. Why won't you come clean about who you spoke to inside the SDNY?
Speaker 4: Because I don't work for you. Because I don't have to tell you anything. There are literally ask me questions about you. I tell them the
Speaker 3: truth. Have you ever
Speaker 4: about your behavior. Have you ever Your behavior is grotesque. You're grotesque. You be and I love how
Speaker 3: Is this grotesque? Is a bullet through my heart and the book grotesque?
Speaker 2: I need a target.
Speaker 3: Who did you go to target practice with to shoot the book?
Speaker 4: This is on a ranch in Michigan.
Speaker 3: Were you alone? I was. So you shot my book alone in a ranch in Michigan? A bullet through my heart?
Speaker 4: How does what's the difference between me being alone and me being with other people when I'm doing Some
Speaker 3: would say that it's pretty weird that you're alone shooting my book through a heart with a bullet. Was it a nine millimeter bullet?
Speaker 4: No. It wasn't a nine millimeter bullet.
Speaker 3: Was it a rifle bullet?
Speaker 4: It was a rifle bullet because I was a
Speaker 3: deer practice. So you were you were alone in Michigan shooting my book. There's the exit wound with a rifle bullet. Is that what you're doing?
Speaker 2: Where is my Uber?
Speaker 3: I'm gonna hold I've this already fed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit. When did you feed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit,
Speaker 4: called me and asked me questions about you. I answered them truthfully and honestly.
Speaker 3: Did you feed tons of shit? What shit did you feed the Southern District? Be specific, please.
Speaker 4: The truth about your spending and your abuse of the people around you.
Speaker 3: So we have Matt Tierra man is on tape admitting to be an FBI informant. He's the first time breaking news. Matthew Tierra man has just admitted that he's an f barking. I'll be up What what is the what is the Philadelphia society gonna see gonna say when they see this? Bro Aren't you on the board of the Philadelphia society, Matthew?
Speaker 4: I'm on the board of many organizations. Not project Veritas because you blew that up.
Speaker 2: There was no project Veritas after he set fire to it.
Speaker 3: So you're saying that I set fire to it, but you you indefinitely suspended without pay three years ago.
Speaker 4: I didn't indefinitely suspend you. You voted on that. I did vote on it because it made sense when you were stealing so much money to use for your own utilization. Yeah.
Speaker 3: You said that I banged private whores on private planes.
Speaker 2: I'm the dude who spent 2 and a half million dollars on private planes to bank checks he sent into his DMs.
Speaker 3: That's a lie. Can you name a specific plane that I banged a whore
Speaker 0: on?
Speaker 4: I did not say that. And if these things are character You have
Speaker 3: it on tape. So we'll I'm quoting you.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Dude, your your career is
Speaker 4: floundering, bro. You're doing fuck all nothing. Like, this is the vendetta
Speaker 3: Tell the camera. Tell the camera my career is floundering.
Speaker 4: You misappropriated millions of dollars in a five zero one
Speaker 2: c three. You abused your employee.
Speaker 3: That's defamation. Left with women for jobs. No. That's total defamation. So when you make that statement Yeah.
You're gonna have to back it up with evidence, Matt.
Speaker 4: We will do that. We'll do
Speaker 3: that. The American people are seeing is a guy who says he wants to murder me. You're shooting up my heart on my book. You say you're a confidential informant to the Southern District of New York, and you won't said that. Okay.
Let let me quote you. Quote. That's why I fed the Southern District Of New York tons of shit to try to get him in prison.
Speaker 4: I you still law enforcement agency who would ask me a question as much information they wanted. The American
Speaker 3: Why haven't you done any investigative videos? Why hasn't any of the people done any investigative videos?
Speaker 4: I've done tons of investigative videos.
Speaker 3: What investigative video have you done within the last year that's been a hit?
Speaker 4: Dude, unlike you, I don't do it to LARP for the audience.
Speaker 3: What's why do you do it, Matthew? Why be a confidential FBI informant? Why? Why? What's the purpose
Speaker 4: of Truth, you doing justice, and the American way, calling out evil, narcissistic, sociopathic motherfuckers.
Speaker 3: Is it all about money? Is it all about money to you?
Speaker 4: Dude, this is like a
Speaker 3: $100,000,000 is what you said. You wanted a $100,000,000.
Speaker 2: Right now, I think my highest best use of time and power is making a $100,000,000 to weaponize money better than anyone.
Speaker 4: Is that your price? My price is my life. Right? No. Yeah.
Your price is dirty horse.
Speaker 3: I guess your price is a $100,000,000. Mate, Matthew Tierraumont, there he is, threatening court. He did admit, Matthew. Let's see who he's texting. He's in a text who who is who is he texting right there?
Who is he texting? Hi. Hi. Yeah. We're filming you too.
Yeah. FBI informant. SDNY informant Matthew Thierrymond. Wow. We're here in, Miami Beach, and we just approached the former board member of Project Veritas who he said he wanted to kill me.
He confirmed that. He confirmed he was basically a rat, a fed fed information to the Biden justice department and talked to law enforcement agencies to try to get me arrested. This is the former board member of Project Veritas just changing it up, saying all types of crazy things. I think he was in a state of shock, but he tried to talk over me. He tried to say a bunch of outlandish crazy stuff to try to get his message across.
But, yeah, reporting from Miami Beach, this is James O'Keefe with OMG.
reSee.it AI Summary
A claim argues Windows updates enable OneDrive by default, moving files to the cloud and making Microsoft servers the primary copy. Users report sudden data loss: photos, work files, and desktops wiped with no warning and a “Where are my files?” icon. Turning OneDrive off can delete local and cloud files; freeing space can delete everywhere. A buried menu or guide is needed to opt out. @Gothmogg suggests using Task Manager Startup to disable OneDrive, as other options were removed.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
BILL GATES’ MICROSOFT CAN ERASE YOUR ENTIRE COMPUTER - AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE IT UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE A man is going viral after exposing what millions of Windows users are just now realizing about Bill Gates’ Microsoft. "I think they should have to go to jail for this." Windows updates quietly turn on OneDrive without a plain English warning. Your files don’t get “backed up.” They get moved. Your computer becomes a temporary access point. Microsoft’s servers become the primary copy. Then the trap snaps shut. People report: • Family photos gone • Work files wiped • Years of data erased • Clean desktops with no warning • A little icon asking: “Where are my files?” Many thought it was ransomware. It wasn’t. Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally. Deleting files to “free up space” deletes them everywhere. The only way out? A buried menu… or a YouTube tutorial. Nowhere does it clearly say: “We are transferring your entire computer to our servers.” Millions clicked “Update” without knowing this was included. If a company can silently take control of your files and delete them with one wrong click - how is this not malware?
@Gothmogg - ELeven Seven
@thematrixb0t Use Task Manager Startup menu And disable Onedrive. They removed all other means of turning it off besides End Task. So never letting it start to begin with. It's the only thing I found that at this time. https://t.co/IxwiQBdfQg
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing a post that blasts Windows updates for secretly turning on OneDrive, moving files to Microsoft’s servers instead of backing them up. The computer becomes a temporary access point, with the cloud as the primary copy. Turning OneDrive off can delete locally, and deleting files to “free up space” wipes them everywhere. Only a buried menu or a YouTube tutorial reveals the workaround. Millions clicked Update, unaware of this transfer.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
BILL GATES’ MICROSOFT CAN ERASE YOUR ENTIRE COMPUTER - AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T REALIZE IT UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE A man is going viral after exposing what millions of Windows users are just now realizing about Bill Gates’ Microsoft. "I think they should have to go to jail for this." Windows updates quietly turn on OneDrive without a plain English warning. Your files don’t get “backed up.” They get moved. Your computer becomes a temporary access point. Microsoft’s servers become the primary copy. Then the trap snaps shut. People report: • Family photos gone • Work files wiped • Years of data erased • Clean desktops with no warning • A little icon asking: “Where are my files?” Many thought it was ransomware. It wasn’t. Turning OneDrive off can delete everything locally. Deleting files to “free up space” deletes them everywhere. The only way out? A buried menu… or a YouTube tutorial. Nowhere does it clearly say: “We are transferring your entire computer to our servers.” Millions clicked “Update” without knowing this was included. If a company can silently take control of your files and delete them with one wrong click - how is this not malware?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Windows includes a piece of malware called OneDrive that will spontaneously delete all files on the user’s local computer without warning or confirmation. They assert that after Windows updates, OneDrive starts automatically and quietly uploads everything on the computer to Microsoft servers, sometimes noticeable only when the user is on a slow or metered connection and sees a large upload, or when OneDrive warns that it is running out of space. When users attempt to stop it by turning off OneDrive backup, they allegedly find that all their local files have been deleted, and their desktop shows a single icon that says, “Where are my files?”
The speaker states that many people assume they have been hit by ransomware or a virus because of the sudden loss of data, and when they click the icon, they are told that all of their life’s work is now on Microsoft’s machine, and that Microsoft helpedfully deleted it from the user’s machine without ever asking. They claim users are then forced to download all of their data back to their machine, which can be a massive, time-consuming process on slow or metered connections.
Furthermore, they argue that when users try to delete the files from OneDrive, the files are deleted from Microsoft servers and then also deleted from the user’s computer again, with no warning or confirmation. The only way to delete the files from Microsoft’s machine without removing them from the local machine, according to the speaker, is to follow a YouTube tutorial with detailed steps. The speaker emphasizes that there is no plain-language option to opt out, and that OneDrive’s options are buried in menus and do not clearly explain that the service takes everything on the computer and makes their machine secondary to OneDrive.
The speaker contends this behavior is not intuitive by design and that it is easy to accidentally delete everything, especially when OneDrive indicates it is full and prompts deletion that also removes files from the local machine. They conclude by expressing disbelief that this was allowed to be released and that no one stepped in to stop it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they should have to go to jail for this. I'm only barely joking here. If you're unaware, for the last few years, Windows has come with a piece of malware called OneDrive, and OneDrive, if you're not careful, will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer. Not on their computer on OneDrive, I mean off of your machine, the one that's in your house. If you have been fortunate enough to not have your life ruined by OneDrive, just Google that word and you will find a torrent of people saying, It took everything.
All of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone. OneDrive will not give you any warning whatsoever that it is about to do this. It will not give you a confirmation button to hit. It will not give you a pop up or anything. Here's how it happens.
At some point, your Windows computer will update to start using OneDrive. At no point in the process will you be given any kind of a plain language warning to opt out of it. It will just start doing it. Then at some point, you will notice that it is quietly uploading everything on your computer to Microsoft servers. Some of you will only notice this because you're on a slow or metered Internet connection and it's trying to upload 40 gigabytes of video and work files and private records.
Or you may have only found out when OneDrive gave you a warning that it was running out of space. So you will look up how do I make it stop doing that and you will find the option to turn off OneDrive backup. Then you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone. Everything on your computer was deleted by Microsoft. And on your desktop, completely clean of icons, will be one cheeky little icon that says, Where are my files?
Many, many people who saw this assumed they had been hit by a ransomware attack or a virus where some hacker has stolen all of their data and is now holding it hostage. So you click on that icon and it says, Don't worry, all of your life's work is now on our machine. We helpfully deleted it from your machine without ever asking you. But we're still not at the worst part because at this point you'll be forced to download all of your stuff back to your machine. Again, God help you if you're on a slow or metered internet connection because you now have to grab the many gigabytes of work and slowly bring it back.
At which point you will say, Okay, Microsoft, I don't want you to have my files. I want to delete them off of OneDrive. So on your local computer, you will have all of the files on your local machine now, then it will show where those files are also on OneDrive. So you will go into OneDrive and you will delete them, only to find that when you delete them off of Microsoft servers, they go in and delete them off your computer again with no warning, with no pop up, without anything. The only way to delete the files off their machine without also deleting them off of your machine is to go find a YouTube tutorial walking through the detailed steps on how to do it.
To be absolutely clear, to make OneDrive not do this requires looking it up. There is no intuitive way to do it. They intentionally buried those options in the menus and none of those options say in plain English what they do. At no point in any of this does it come out and say in plain English, Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead? If it did say that, everyone would say no.
They realize this. The issue is that by now everybody is familiar with the concept of storing files on the cloud. Lots of machines offer the cloud as a backup if you want. You would assume that that's what OneDrive is. It's a chance to back up your files in case something happens to your local machine, but that is not what it is.
OneDrive secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files. When you work on your local machine, they treat it as you temporarily accessing those files. This, of course, massively slows down your machine because instead of writing and reading data to your hard drive, you're having to upload and download it to the cloud. What this means in practice is if anything happens to the file on their machine, it's deleted everywhere because you no longer have it.
It's only on their machine. You're just allowed to temporarily access it. And at no point anywhere do they explain in plain language that this is what they're doing. It is so unintuitive that it is very easy to accidentally delete everything you have everywhere. Do you understand when OneDrive says that it's full and you go in to delete some things to free up space, it deletes it from your machine, too?
I genuinely cannot believe that this was allowed to go out the door like this or that nobody else stepped in to stop them.
reSee.it AI Summary
John McAfee argues encryption is useless. In response, the commenter says the system is rigged: the ones who build the barriers also control access, encryption just a carrot to feel safe while agencies hold the master key. He calls it a psyop, claiming true privacy is limited.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
John Mcafee explaining why encryption is useless https://t.co/ZHuUrXKedD
Video Transcript AI Summary
John McAfee argues that privacy is gone even with encrypted systems. He states: “If you think you have any privacy whatsoever with an encrypted system, whether it's an email system like ProtonMail or an encrypted messaging system like Signal, you have no fucking privacy.” He claims encryption was designed thirty five years ago to prevent a man in the middle attack, between transmission and receipt, but asserts “There’s no man in the middle anymore. We don’t need them.” He contends that the smartphone is the surveillance device preferred by every government on the fucking planet, and asserts: “How easy it is to plant malware.”
McAfee describes the vulnerability by referencing adult sites: “Go on Pornhub. If you’ve been on Pornhub, someone is now listening to you.” He explains that a drive-by of a website sets the download unauthorized applications flag, and with the first click, malware is installed that does two things: “watching your inputs before they're encrypted and transmitting them, and reading the outputs after they are fucking encrypted.” He maintains that encryption is a worthless piece of shit, old technology that is being marketed as a safe system, and asserts: “There is no safety anymore. There is no privacy.”
He explains his own use of Gmail: “I use Gmail for one reason. The last company that requires this fucking subpoena from the government in order to give them your information.” He notes that lawyers have “thirty fucking days to review the subpoena,” and claims: “Thirty days is enough for me. I change my fucking email every fifteen days.” He exhorts listeners to wake up, insisting: “You have no more privacy.”
McAfee concludes that people are being sold a bill of goods, which is worthless with encryption, and thanks listeners: “Thank you for listening.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Morning. John McAfee here. I am just constantly for using Gmail as my email system. Let me explain something to you. If you think you have any privacy whatsoever with an encrypted system, whether it's an email system like ProtonMail or an encrypted messaging system like Signal, you have no fucking privacy.
Encryption was designed thirty five years ago to prevent a man in the middle attack, meaning someone between your transmission and your receipt. There's no man in the middle anymore. We don't need them. Your fucking smartphone is the surveillance device preferred by every government on the fucking planet. Do you know how easy it is to plant malware?
Go on Pornhub. If you've been on Pornhub, someone is now listening to you. All you have to do is do a drive by of a website and it sets the download unauthorized applications flag. The first click, you now have malware that is doing two things. Watching your inputs before they're encrypted and transmitting them, and reading the outputs after they are fucking encrypted people.
Encryption is a worthless piece of shit, old technology that is being marketed as a safe system. There is no safety anymore. There is no privacy. I use Gmail for one reason. The last company that requires this fucking subpoena from the government in order to give them your information.
And their lawyers have thirty fucking days to review the subpoena. Thirty days is enough for me. I change my fucking email every fifteen days. Wake up, people. You have no more privacy.
You are being sold a fucking bill of goods, which is worthless with encryption. Man, thank you for listening.
@ChrisJo00291974 - BunnyCrumbs
McAfee knew the game was rigged because he built the fence the wolves hide behind. Encryption is just a digital carrot on a stick designed to make you feel safe while the alphabet agencies have the master key. They let you lock your front door but built the house with transparent walls. It is a classic psyop to track your patterns while you think you are hiding. The code is only as private as they allow it to be.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
Ba'al Symbolism in Washington D.C. https://t.co/PAjKFZdlhY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Symbols reveal and they conceal. And that's why they're used and that's why they're so important. They reveal to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Corn is an important symbol in masonry and is one found repeatedly Washington DC. But what sort of hidden meaning could apply to corn? In Hebrew, the word for corn is Daegen, which became the name of a Babylonian god. Some believe the same god was adopted by the Phoenicians under the name Dagon. While Dagon was often worshiped as the fish god, he was also the god of corn. His son was known as Baal, who was often called the son of Dagan or the son of corn. Could Baal have been the model for the bearded male images that appear throughout Washington DC? Take note of this image with ears of corn carved into the hair. According to legend, Bael was once slain by the god of death and taken into the underworld. But at some point, he was resurrected or as it is sometimes called, awakened.
At Haines Point in Washington DC is found this mysterious statue of a bearded giant rising up out of the ground. The statue is called the awakening. At the higher levels, the Masons secretly worship Baal under a hidden and unusual name.
It's Jobulun. It's a combination of Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris. It's a deity that is not the the god of of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
In fact, it's interesting. Baal or Baal is depicted in the New Testament by the Jews as well as Jesus. He's called the ruler of demons. It's another name for Satan.
Well, I think it's obvious that anybody who has the eyes to see can see that that Washington DC and indeed many other state capitals are festooned with occult symbols.
Because these symbols come from the esoteric realm, it is important to define them according to the thinking of occult philosophers. In the book, Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated, we find this quote from Masonic author Charles g Berger, who says that symbols came to have two meanings, the esoteric and the exoteric. The esoteric meaning was the true or original meaning, understood only by a few and closely guarded by them. The exoteric meaning was the invented or modified explanation intended for the many.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Symbols reveal and they conceal. And that's why they're used and that's why they're so important. They reveal to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Speaker 1: Corn is an important symbol in masonry and is one found repeatedly Washington DC. But what sort of hidden meaning could apply to corn? In Hebrew, the word for corn is Daegen, which became the name of a Babylonian god. Some believe the same god was adopted by the Phoenicians under the name Dagon. While Dagon was often worshiped as the fish god, he was also the god of corn.
His son was known as Baal, who was often called the son of Dagan or the son of corn. Could Baal have been the model for the bearded male images that appear throughout Washington DC? Take note of this image with ears of corn carved into the hair. According to legend, Bael was once slain by the god of death and taken into the underworld. But at some point, he was resurrected or as it is sometimes called, awakened.
At Haines Point in Washington DC is found this mysterious statue of a bearded giant rising up out of the ground. The statue is called the awakening. At the higher levels, the Masons secretly worship Baal under a hidden and unusual name.
Speaker 2: It's Jobulun. It's a combination of Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris. It's a deity that is not the the god of of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Speaker 3: In fact, it's interesting. Baal or Baal is depicted in the New Testament by the Jews as well as Jesus. He's called the ruler of demons. It's another name for Satan.
Speaker 4: Well, I think it's obvious that anybody who has the eyes to see can see that that Washington DC and indeed many other state capitals are festooned with occult symbols.
Speaker 1: Because these symbols come from the esoteric realm, it is important to define them according to the thinking of occult philosophers. In the book, Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated, we find this quote from Masonic author Charles g Berger, who says that symbols came to have two meanings, the esoteric and the exoteric. The esoteric meaning was the true or original meaning, understood only by a few and closely guarded by them. The exoteric meaning was the invented or modified explanation intended for the many.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
American trucker verifies the existence of an extensive underground tunnel network stretching hundreds of miles, extending from Washington, D.C. to Maine and Colorado, along with a complete subterranean city. https://t.co/xd07OEfHR8
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a 2013 YouTube video, a trucker discusses a massive underground secret city being built in the United States. He claims there is a tunnel 100 miles long to reach this place, and that there are more tunnels. The route is said to go all the way to Washington DC, with additional mentions of Maine and Colorado, and an underground roadway system that runs completely underground. He says they deliver to military, and asks about what’s hauled, with mentions of hauling “crack” and “a lot of military stuff being hauled around lately.” They assert there is a water supply, a food supply, and everything needed in this underground city, which is stocked with food, water, and all necessities, and that there is no cell phone service. The conversation references the “North entrance,” and there is an intent to “go see if we can do some more digging.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2013, a video was uploaded to YouTube of a trucker talking to a man about a massive underground secret city that was being built in The United States. They had to take this tunnel 100 miles in to reach this place. And apparently there were more of these tunnels. Check this out.
Speaker 1: Goes all the way to Washington DC, Goes all the way to Washington DC. Yeah. You security? No. Yeah.
How far have you taken this down to how far have you actually ran a load? 100 miles? Up to Maine? No shit. How many miles do you think that is?
Man, that's unbelievable. Not to mention, I heard, there's one that goes all the way to Colorado. Right? Unbelievable. What do you think you're hauling?
Any idea? Crack.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Okay. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Crack makes all kinds
Speaker 2: of stuff. Yeah. You don't really know.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I know there's been a lot of military stuff being hauled around lately. That's for sure. We deliver to military. Gotcha.
Gotcha. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I appreciate. I heard there's water supply, food supply, everything's in there.
Yeah. Unbelievable. You don't get no cell phone for sure. Peace, brother. I mean, basically, you got an underground road roadway system here that that runs all the way to Maine, to Washington DC, to Colorado.
It's fully stocked. It runs completely underground. And this is stocked with food, water, everything they need. It's an underground city. So this is
Speaker 3: the North entrance, and we're gonna go
Speaker 1: see if we
Speaker 4: can do some more digging.
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion centers on claims about the FDA’s funding from pharma. An official report counters the rumor, stating 47% of funding comes from Big Pharma. A commenter asks for a reliable article to verify the claim.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
The FDA has been the victim of a rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry. In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove that actually only 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma https://t.co/5ADB0zJVVb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the claim that the FDA receives 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, noting that the agency released this figure only after a rumor that 50% of their funding came from pharma. They point out a perceived conflict of interest, suggesting that the people writing rules and regulations are funded by the same entities being regulated. The speaker shares personal health concerns and notes difficulty finding valid information not paid for by big pharma. They state that 85 to 90 percent of women with similar issues experience changes or relief in symptoms simply by changing their diet, specifically by going gluten-free, though the speaker personally is not inclined to go gluten-free. Instead, they mention cutting out refined carbs and sugars and report feeling a ton different after only two days on this diet. They express excitement about sharing the journey with viewers. The speaker mentions reassembling a squat rack for a home gym and acquiring egg-laying birds, describing these actions as part of a broader stance against big pharma. They reiterate disbelief that 47% of FDA funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry and declare “a big to big pharma.” The speaker invites audience thoughts and feedback on the topics discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone wanna talk about the fact that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry? 47%. And they only released this information because there was a rumor that 50% of their funding came from the pharmaceutical industry. So they came out and said, no. Actually, it's only 47%.
So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest. No? So I've been having a few health issues and I realized in researching which has been really difficult to actually find valid information that isn't paid for by big pharma, eighty five to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.
Now I personally am not one to do that, but I am cutting out refined carbs and sugars from my diet. I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different. Just kinda makes you wonder, but I'm excited to be bringing you guys along for this whole journey. We're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym. We did get some egg laying birds, and we're just basically saying a big to big pharma.
I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay. Anyway, as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.
@KCDVM - Dr.WeimCrime
@thematrixb0t @Grok is this true and can you provide a reliable article on the subject?
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
BOEBERT: "Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals? Have you heard of that sort of research?" GOODMAN: "We did an analysis showing that over 90% of experiments using human fetal tissue & putting them in animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID." https://t.co/QLF6WISHGT
Video Transcript AI Summary
First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research?
Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID.
First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue?
Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure.
First speaker: Madam Chair, I think
Second speaker: we
First speaker: need to look into that as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research?
Speaker 1: Yeah. We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID.
Speaker 0: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue?
Speaker 1: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure.
Speaker 0: Madam Chair, I think
Speaker 1: we
Speaker 0: need to look into that as well.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
News clip from the 90's surfaces detailing how the ADL was caught red handed creating fake Nazi groups to justify their existence & raise money. https://t.co/fJfpGE7Nr6
Video Transcript AI Summary
In February 1979, there was a major uproar after James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia. An investigation by reporters revealed that James Gutman was actually Mordecai Levy, who had worked with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and later split off to form the terrorist Jewish Defense League. The claim is that this was an operation run by the ADL. The objective, as stated, was to stage a Nazi march in Philadelphia to generate money and justify the ADL’s existence if antisemitism among American Jews appeared low. The plan allegedly involved placing slostikas on a few individuals and allowing them to carry out the march, after which the ADL would intervene, presenting the appearance of Nazis on the streets to rally financial support. The implication is that this was part of a broader, ongoing strategy rather than a one-time stunt, with the aim of obtaining financial backing and tax-exempt status through perceived threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many of you may remember in February 1979, there was a big uproar because someone by the name of James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia. Now eventually, some enterprising reporters did an investigation. You know what they turned up? James Gutman was none other than Mordecai Levy, who worked with the anti defamation league and later split off that to form the terrorist Jewish defense league. This was an operation that was run by the ADL.
They wanted to have a Nazi march in Philadelphia. Why? Because how can they raise money to justify their existence if American Jews don't think there's a lot of antisemitism? So what better thing to do than to slap slostikas on a couple of people, leave them on a march through town, and then the next day, the ADL comes marching in and says, look, there are Nazis on the streets. You need to give us money so we can protect you.
And then on top of that, have a tax exempt status. This was not a one time operation.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
I finally found this video after months of searching. They've tried to keep this off of social media because it exposes all of the young people who died suddenly because of the jab. https://t.co/UEt3iAgfgP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a belief that five G interfaces with injections are real, asserting that DARPA conducts research and operational programs to infect people with remote-controllable prion clusters in the brain even before the COVID rollout. The speaker says this prospect gives them chills and portrays it as evil, claiming it would allow a takeover by colonizing people.
The speaker asserts that this technology would implant prion clusters into everyone, regardless of whether they have received the shot, and that the proteins would grow inside the body. They claim that these proteins would be activated by a frequency, and the result would resemble a death from a stroke, spreading across the brain. The description continues with the claim that the system could hit people with a frequency that causes widespread neurological effects, leading to medical crises.
According to the speaker, the prion clusters would generate crystals throughout the brain over the next several days, capable of damaging arteries, veins, and capillaries, ultimately causing a stroke. An alternative method is also described: a light dose could be used to render people sick and unable to think clearly, effectively fogging their minds.
The overall assertion presented is that remote-control capabilities could be embedded in the brain through 5G-related interfaces and injections, enabling a form of widespread control or disruption. The narrative emphasizes coercive and pervasive impact, claiming both violent physical outcomes (such as strokes) and cognitive impairment through deliberate exposure to frequencies and controlled dosing. The speaker expresses strong emotion and concern, portraying the described scenario as a highly dangerous and malevolent scheme involving global implantation and manipulation of human physiology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All that talk you heard about five g interfacing with the shots, it's true. DARPA research and the operational programs to infect us with remote controllable prion clusters in the brain before they even rolled out COVID. I just got chills. This is so evil. I mean, this is how you take over.
You colonize people. You implant everybody with these, whether you've had the shot or not, it's everywhere. You get these proteins growing in you. They hit you with the frequency, and it looks like you've died of a stroke. Man, this is bad.
All over your brain, hit you with it. Crystals grow the next few days, cut through arteries, cut through veins, cut through capillaries, stroke out. Or he says we can just hit it with a light dose and just fog everybody out and make them sick where they can't think straight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel strangely aware of everything: money is just paper we’ve agreed on, yet we rush through deadlines, status, and possessions. People drift through a game they didn’t choose, trapped in a matrix of social constructs. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
"Does anyone else feel like they're just too aware of everything?" "Money is literally just paper that someone decided is valuable, and we all just agreed." "I find it fascinating to watch people rushing through their day, stressed about deadlines and status and possessions, completely unaware that they're playing a game they never chose to join." "They're so caught up in the matrix of social constructs, they never question any of it." "But once you see it, you can't unsee it."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker conveys a sense that human experience is temporary, constructed, and ultimately meaningless, as if they are seeing through a veil others cannot. They point out that days of the week are arbitrarily designated (Monday, Tuesday) and that money and street names were created by people, not by some inherent law. Money is described as "literally paper that someone decided this is valuable," and we all follow systems created by regular people who came before us. They observe people rushing through their days, stressed about deadlines, status, and possessions, unaware they are playing a game they never chose to join. These individuals are caught in the matrix of social constructs and fail to question any of it. Once this perspective is seen, it cannot be unseen, leading the speaker to wonder whether ignorance really is bliss.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone else feel like they're just too aware of everything? I can't shake his feeling that all of this, our entire human experience, is just temporary, constructed, and ultimately meaningless, like I'm seeing through some veil that others can't. Think about it. The days of the week, someone just arbitrarily make decided this is Monday, this is Tuesday, and we all just accept it. It's all made up.
The guy that made up currency and street names is no smarter than me or you. Money is just literally paper that someone decided this is valuable, and we all just agreed. We're following systems created by regular people who happen to come before us. I find it fascinating to watch people rushing through their day, stressed about deadlines and status and possessions, completely unaware that they're playing a game they never chose to join. They're so caught up in the matrix of social constructs, they never question any of it.
But once you see it, you can't unsee it. And sometimes I wonder if ignorance really is bliss.
@neworldorderbot - nwobot
Professional sports are used to distract billions from the fact the elite are robbing the planet brutally
Video Transcript AI Summary
Movies and drama have always been more than just entertainment, as they convey social messages through emotional sequences. This emotional content is important because it bypasses logical thinking and is fixed in the mind. A century ago, an organization planned to use culture to control society, including the introduction of adult sports as a way to distract and disengage men. This manipulation continues today through television, which puts viewers in an alpha state and downloads new ideas into their minds. People now rely on the media to do their thinking and reasoning for them, resulting in a programmed society. The ultimate revolution is the ability to control people's minds directly, making them love their own servitude.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people still today think that all entertainment to do with movies, drama is is there for nothing more than entertainment. It never ever was that case.
Speaker 1: Of course, television can't perform such miracles as this. Yes. But perhaps there's no harm wishing that it could.
Speaker 0: The greatest social social messages are promoted through movies and drama, high drama through the fixation of emotive sequences, emotional sequences, sequences, not logical factual sequences, but pushing points across in an emotional, emotional way, which register and fixed in the mind. So emotional content is very, very important rather than going through an actual discussion or an argument using logic and facts. There's no debates. And when you're being downloaded through fiction, your guard is sound. The sensor part of your brain is not an action.
It isn't saying, yes, I agree with this. I disagree with that, as you would in a debate or a lecture. You're actually in an alpha state being completely downloaded with new ideas. About a 100 years ago, this big organization with many branches, they wanted to rule the all basically using Britain as a nucleus of a system, an embryo, which also is going to be with the US under the Anglo American establishment, wrote about the kind of culture and the changes of culture over a 100 year period that they would actually design, implement, and bring in. And, HG Wells talked about it too.
He talked about arenas, and he says arenas could be put up across the world for sports, for instance. Now at that time, Sports is something that children, school children were into. Adults became adults and got onto adult things. So it was unimaginable at the time that people could actually believe that, there's even a need for adult sports and entertainment. Never mind having our arenas built across the world.
But he said we can do this and, you know, voiced basically a sports culture for the males. Using a tribal system, we're all tribal to an extent. That's why we even bother to vote for a tribal leader. Is well understood. That's why it was applied with these leaders.
And because the average man was to become more disengaged from his own destiny. As the expert class arose, it was decided that the males would get their their their outlet basically, being gradually becoming helpless as males through sports. Therefore they'd have a tribal team they could identify with. They could, cheer them on as they were winning in their own personal lives. They were getting nowhere.
They were getting disenfranchised in a sense as experts took over, decision making for them in all kinds of fields. So this was psychology that you planned before they even implement into sports.
Speaker 2: That's why they pay athletes these fantastic salaries. I was listening to radio the other day. They just contracted to pay 1 1 player or 1 team $6,000,000 a year. Can you believe this?
Speaker 3: And why is that?
Speaker 2: It's the Roman circus. What does the emperor do when the people become restive And when the people are asking questions and when the people don't like the policies of the Emperor, he sends them to the circus. He creates a circus. He builds a giant coliseum, and he begins to throw the Christians to the lions. And he has great chariot races and football games and basketball games, all to keep the idiots preoccupied with things that don't mean anything in the scheme of the entire world so that they don't have the time to learn what the truth is, so they don't ever get smart enough to learn how they're being manipulated, so they don't ever question the emperor.
That's why they pay a player on a football team or a baseball team a $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a year. It is the Roman circus. I know men who don't know anything in the world except who plays third base for the Mets. And they think that's a great accomplishment. And they meet and pat each other on the back and bond and go have cocktails And talk about what this guy, the place, 3rd base for the Mets, did in last night's game.
Sad. It's really sad.
Speaker 0: When radio came along, of first. They use that to the maximum, sports for the men, sports basically for the women. And then in television, as I say, with this alpha state, it's hypnotic state and sure enough around the 1960s, really fifties sixties. It took off. It really, really took off, and men became glued from Sarajanen to the sports shows.
A culture industry which is called by its own the culture industry. The Soviet Union had a department called the culture industry. Their actors and directors were called the cultural leaders. Leaders because they would like a computer. People like computers.
All you have to do is keep giving them new updates every so often. And you can change an entire country or a nation or a block of nations. We're all getting the same uploads, upgrades at the same time along certain paths. Today, we call it political correctness. Most people want to to belong to their peer group.
They want to be the same as everyone else when it comes to opinions. In fact, they judge their own personal sanity by bouncing ideas off their their neighbors and friends who will answer back and agree on these same topics in kind. It doesn't matter if the topics or the of what you're given are facts or or utter nonsense. As long as everyone agrees at the same time. You'll say what I'm saying.
And your friends will all agree because they've had the same information given to them. And it's on TV and a famous face, says something, then it must be true. He doesn't have to show you facts or anything else. You've been brought up with these faces. That's why they keep these guys on television into the seventies and eighties.
You've grown up with this father figure. Who's on television every night at 6 o'clock, in your house, in your room, staring right at you. And he's a father figure. Would he tell you a life. That that's so you naturally never suspect him.
And the same man will lead you through new topics. He'll he'll introduce experts on the topics, but have a little summary at the end of every talk. And you are now left with the conclusion that's presented to you. You don't arrive at it. It's given to you and it's good enough for you.
We're programmed today, perfectly just like machines. We tie this in with the Bracinski. Bracinski said two ages. And this guy was way up with the NSA. He was a he's a master geopolitician.
He works in 20, 50 year periods to do with geopolitics and other countries. But he said himself, the public will shortly be unable to think or reason for themselves. He was meaning by the the form that that of, information that was given to them, the type, the the formulas that were a newsstand in the 19 seventies. It is eventually they'll be unable to think or reason for themselves. And eventually he said that they will expect the media, to do all their thinking and reasoning for them.
Well, that's happened today. That that's why people today can't think outside of the programming from television.
Speaker 3: Is there any room in, in, in the kind of society where these manipulations are not taking place for this type of entertainment or any type of entertainment at all?
Speaker 2: If people understand that a game is a game, if people understand that nobody, nobody, no matter what they do, is worth paying $2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a
Speaker 0: year for.
Speaker 2: People should be able To get rich if they want to. By the sweat of their individual labor. Okay. By going on doing something for the world. Not by taking people's minds away from the Emperor.
It's a game. Football is a game. Football is a game. But let me tell you something. When 150 of the most powerful men and women in the world can meet in secret in Baden Baden, Germany to plot the fate of billions and nobody even cares about it.
But 6 football players go to lunch together and it's in the headlines across the country. You have a reflection of the society in which that exists. And, it is a sick, sick society that is doomed to self destruction.
Speaker 3: So based on that scenario, there's some truth into what these these men are looking at.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And that's what makes me so sick. Is that I'm trying to wake up of people who on a daily basis are proving the ones that I'm warning them about to be right.
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Well, it's so that even though, minority, there are people out there that you recognize are awake to this. If they don't do something about it, they will lose that ability to be free in that way.
Speaker 2: That's correct.
Speaker 3: Whether they might think, well, I don't need to worry about it because I know what I know and I'm fine. It doesn't work that way. There's a connection here. Same.
Speaker 2: That is correct. That is absolutely correct. A nation of people who are willing to send their sons and daughters that they profess that they love to a foreign country to die. And And they use the excuse to themselves that they're sending them off to defend our country and they know damn well that's a lie. They're doomed.
Speaker 0: This is a scientific dictatorship which veteran Russell said. And the Huxley said, both Aldous and Julian Huxley said they would bring in a scientifically controlled society.
Speaker 1: Well now, in regard to this problem of the ultimate revolution, this has been very well summed up by the moderator. In the past, we can say that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing, the environment in order to change the individual. I mean, there's been the political revolution, the economic revolution, in the time of the reformation, the religious revolution. All these, aimed, as I say, not directly at the human being, but at his surroundings. So that by modifying the surroundings, you did achieve, in, at one remove an effect upon the human being.
Today, we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ultimate revolution, the final revolution where a man can act directly on, the mind body of his fellows. Well, needless to say, some kind of direct action on human mind bodies has been going on since the beginning of time. But this has generally been, of a violent nature. The techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial And people have employed them with more or less ingenuity, sometimes with the utmost crudity, sometimes with A good deal of skill acquired by a process of trial and error of finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonment, constraints of various kinds. Well, it seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this, that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which, will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to Get people actually to love their certitude.
This is the, seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolution, shall we say. And this is a problem which has interested me for many years and About which I wrote 30 years ago, a fable, the brave new world, which is, essentially the account of a society making use of all the devices at that time available. And some of the devices which, I imagined to be possible, making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, so to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged, in some kind of a scientific, caste system. A number of techniques about which I talked seem to be here already. And that there seems to be a general movement, in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution.
This method of control by which, people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs, which By any decent standard, they ought not to enjoy. This, I mean, the enjoyment of, of servitude.