TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @thematrixb0t
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion centers on claims about the FDA’s funding from pharma. An official report counters the rumor, stating 47% of funding comes from Big Pharma. A commenter asks for a reliable article to verify the claim.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
The FDA has been the victim of a rumor that 50% of their funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry. In response they’ve released an official report of their funding to prove that actually only 47% of their funding comes from Big Pharma https://t.co/5ADB0zJVVb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the claim that the FDA receives 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, noting that the agency released this figure only after a rumor that 50% of their funding came from pharma. They point out a perceived conflict of interest, suggesting that the people writing rules and regulations are funded by the same entities being regulated. The speaker shares personal health concerns and notes difficulty finding valid information not paid for by big pharma. They state that 85 to 90 percent of women with similar issues experience changes or relief in symptoms simply by changing their diet, specifically by going gluten-free, though the speaker personally is not inclined to go gluten-free. Instead, they mention cutting out refined carbs and sugars and report feeling a ton different after only two days on this diet. They express excitement about sharing the journey with viewers. The speaker mentions reassembling a squat rack for a home gym and acquiring egg-laying birds, describing these actions as part of a broader stance against big pharma. They reiterate disbelief that 47% of FDA funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry and declare “a big to big pharma.” The speaker invites audience thoughts and feedback on the topics discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone wanna talk about the fact that the FDA gets 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry? 47%. And they only released this information because there was a rumor that 50% of their funding came from the pharmaceutical industry. So they came out and said, no. Actually, it's only 47%.
So think about that. The people that you're supposed to be making rules and regulations for are the same people that are paying you money. Seems like a conflict of interest. No? So I've been having a few health issues and I realized in researching which has been really difficult to actually find valid information that isn't paid for by big pharma, eighty five to ninety percent of the women who experience the same issues that I experience notice changes in their symptoms or alleviation completely from their symptoms simply by changing their diet, namely going gluten free.
Now I personally am not one to do that, but I am cutting out refined carbs and sugars from my diet. I've been on this diet for two days now, and I already feel a ton different. Just kinda makes you wonder, but I'm excited to be bringing you guys along for this whole journey. We're putting up our squat rack again in our home gym. We did get some egg laying birds, and we're just basically saying a big to big pharma.
I still can't believe it's 47% of their funding, and they think that's okay. Anyway, as always, I look forward to hearing your thoughts about all of this down below.
@KCDVM - Dr.WeimCrime
@thematrixb0t @Grok is this true and can you provide a reliable article on the subject?
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
BOEBERT: "Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals? Have you heard of that sort of research?" GOODMAN: "We did an analysis showing that over 90% of experiments using human fetal tissue & putting them in animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID." https://t.co/QLF6WISHGT
Video Transcript AI Summary
First speaker: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research?
Second speaker: We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID.
First speaker: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue?
Second speaker: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure.
First speaker: Madam Chair, I think
Second speaker: we
First speaker: need to look into that as well.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Implant aborted baby parts into lab animals. You heard of that sort of research?
Speaker 1: Yeah. We did an analysis a few years ago showing that over ninety percent of experiments with using human fetal tissue and putting them involved animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID.
Speaker 0: Do you know where they're getting the aborted human fetal tissue?
Speaker 1: A lot of it is happening at colleges and universities that have affiliated hospitals that perform that procedure.
Speaker 0: Madam Chair, I think
Speaker 1: we
Speaker 0: need to look into that as well.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
News clip from the 90's surfaces detailing how the ADL was caught red handed creating fake Nazi groups to justify their existence & raise money. https://t.co/fJfpGE7Nr6
Video Transcript AI Summary
In February 1979, there was a major uproar after James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia. An investigation by reporters revealed that James Gutman was actually Mordecai Levy, who had worked with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and later split off to form the terrorist Jewish Defense League. The claim is that this was an operation run by the ADL. The objective, as stated, was to stage a Nazi march in Philadelphia to generate money and justify the ADL’s existence if antisemitism among American Jews appeared low. The plan allegedly involved placing slostikas on a few individuals and allowing them to carry out the march, after which the ADL would intervene, presenting the appearance of Nazis on the streets to rally financial support. The implication is that this was part of a broader, ongoing strategy rather than a one-time stunt, with the aim of obtaining financial backing and tax-exempt status through perceived threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many of you may remember in February 1979, there was a big uproar because someone by the name of James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia. Now eventually, some enterprising reporters did an investigation. You know what they turned up? James Gutman was none other than Mordecai Levy, who worked with the anti defamation league and later split off that to form the terrorist Jewish defense league. This was an operation that was run by the ADL.
They wanted to have a Nazi march in Philadelphia. Why? Because how can they raise money to justify their existence if American Jews don't think there's a lot of antisemitism? So what better thing to do than to slap slostikas on a couple of people, leave them on a march through town, and then the next day, the ADL comes marching in and says, look, there are Nazis on the streets. You need to give us money so we can protect you.
And then on top of that, have a tax exempt status. This was not a one time operation.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
I finally found this video after months of searching. They've tried to keep this off of social media because it exposes all of the young people who died suddenly because of the jab. https://t.co/UEt3iAgfgP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a belief that five G interfaces with injections are real, asserting that DARPA conducts research and operational programs to infect people with remote-controllable prion clusters in the brain even before the COVID rollout. The speaker says this prospect gives them chills and portrays it as evil, claiming it would allow a takeover by colonizing people.
The speaker asserts that this technology would implant prion clusters into everyone, regardless of whether they have received the shot, and that the proteins would grow inside the body. They claim that these proteins would be activated by a frequency, and the result would resemble a death from a stroke, spreading across the brain. The description continues with the claim that the system could hit people with a frequency that causes widespread neurological effects, leading to medical crises.
According to the speaker, the prion clusters would generate crystals throughout the brain over the next several days, capable of damaging arteries, veins, and capillaries, ultimately causing a stroke. An alternative method is also described: a light dose could be used to render people sick and unable to think clearly, effectively fogging their minds.
The overall assertion presented is that remote-control capabilities could be embedded in the brain through 5G-related interfaces and injections, enabling a form of widespread control or disruption. The narrative emphasizes coercive and pervasive impact, claiming both violent physical outcomes (such as strokes) and cognitive impairment through deliberate exposure to frequencies and controlled dosing. The speaker expresses strong emotion and concern, portraying the described scenario as a highly dangerous and malevolent scheme involving global implantation and manipulation of human physiology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All that talk you heard about five g interfacing with the shots, it's true. DARPA research and the operational programs to infect us with remote controllable prion clusters in the brain before they even rolled out COVID. I just got chills. This is so evil. I mean, this is how you take over.
You colonize people. You implant everybody with these, whether you've had the shot or not, it's everywhere. You get these proteins growing in you. They hit you with the frequency, and it looks like you've died of a stroke. Man, this is bad.
All over your brain, hit you with it. Crystals grow the next few days, cut through arteries, cut through veins, cut through capillaries, stroke out. Or he says we can just hit it with a light dose and just fog everybody out and make them sick where they can't think straight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel strangely aware of everything: money is just paper we’ve agreed on, yet we rush through deadlines, status, and possessions. People drift through a game they didn’t choose, trapped in a matrix of social constructs. Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
@thematrixb0t - matrixbot
"Does anyone else feel like they're just too aware of everything?" "Money is literally just paper that someone decided is valuable, and we all just agreed." "I find it fascinating to watch people rushing through their day, stressed about deadlines and status and possessions, completely unaware that they're playing a game they never chose to join." "They're so caught up in the matrix of social constructs, they never question any of it." "But once you see it, you can't unsee it."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker conveys a sense that human experience is temporary, constructed, and ultimately meaningless, as if they are seeing through a veil others cannot. They point out that days of the week are arbitrarily designated (Monday, Tuesday) and that money and street names were created by people, not by some inherent law. Money is described as "literally paper that someone decided this is valuable," and we all follow systems created by regular people who came before us. They observe people rushing through their days, stressed about deadlines, status, and possessions, unaware they are playing a game they never chose to join. These individuals are caught in the matrix of social constructs and fail to question any of it. Once this perspective is seen, it cannot be unseen, leading the speaker to wonder whether ignorance really is bliss.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does anyone else feel like they're just too aware of everything? I can't shake his feeling that all of this, our entire human experience, is just temporary, constructed, and ultimately meaningless, like I'm seeing through some veil that others can't. Think about it. The days of the week, someone just arbitrarily make decided this is Monday, this is Tuesday, and we all just accept it. It's all made up.
The guy that made up currency and street names is no smarter than me or you. Money is just literally paper that someone decided this is valuable, and we all just agreed. We're following systems created by regular people who happen to come before us. I find it fascinating to watch people rushing through their day, stressed about deadlines and status and possessions, completely unaware that they're playing a game they never chose to join. They're so caught up in the matrix of social constructs, they never question any of it.
But once you see it, you can't unsee it. And sometimes I wonder if ignorance really is bliss.
@neworldorderbot - nwobot
Professional sports are used to distract billions from the fact the elite are robbing the planet brutally
Video Transcript AI Summary
Movies and drama have always been more than just entertainment, as they convey social messages through emotional sequences. This emotional content is important because it bypasses logical thinking and is fixed in the mind. A century ago, an organization planned to use culture to control society, including the introduction of adult sports as a way to distract and disengage men. This manipulation continues today through television, which puts viewers in an alpha state and downloads new ideas into their minds. People now rely on the media to do their thinking and reasoning for them, resulting in a programmed society. The ultimate revolution is the ability to control people's minds directly, making them love their own servitude.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people still today think that all entertainment to do with movies, drama is is there for nothing more than entertainment. It never ever was that case.
Speaker 1: Of course, television can't perform such miracles as this. Yes. But perhaps there's no harm wishing that it could.
Speaker 0: The greatest social social messages are promoted through movies and drama, high drama through the fixation of emotive sequences, emotional sequences, sequences, not logical factual sequences, but pushing points across in an emotional, emotional way, which register and fixed in the mind. So emotional content is very, very important rather than going through an actual discussion or an argument using logic and facts. There's no debates. And when you're being downloaded through fiction, your guard is sound. The sensor part of your brain is not an action.
It isn't saying, yes, I agree with this. I disagree with that, as you would in a debate or a lecture. You're actually in an alpha state being completely downloaded with new ideas. About a 100 years ago, this big organization with many branches, they wanted to rule the all basically using Britain as a nucleus of a system, an embryo, which also is going to be with the US under the Anglo American establishment, wrote about the kind of culture and the changes of culture over a 100 year period that they would actually design, implement, and bring in. And, HG Wells talked about it too.
He talked about arenas, and he says arenas could be put up across the world for sports, for instance. Now at that time, Sports is something that children, school children were into. Adults became adults and got onto adult things. So it was unimaginable at the time that people could actually believe that, there's even a need for adult sports and entertainment. Never mind having our arenas built across the world.
But he said we can do this and, you know, voiced basically a sports culture for the males. Using a tribal system, we're all tribal to an extent. That's why we even bother to vote for a tribal leader. Is well understood. That's why it was applied with these leaders.
And because the average man was to become more disengaged from his own destiny. As the expert class arose, it was decided that the males would get their their their outlet basically, being gradually becoming helpless as males through sports. Therefore they'd have a tribal team they could identify with. They could, cheer them on as they were winning in their own personal lives. They were getting nowhere.
They were getting disenfranchised in a sense as experts took over, decision making for them in all kinds of fields. So this was psychology that you planned before they even implement into sports.
Speaker 2: That's why they pay athletes these fantastic salaries. I was listening to radio the other day. They just contracted to pay 1 1 player or 1 team $6,000,000 a year. Can you believe this?
Speaker 3: And why is that?
Speaker 2: It's the Roman circus. What does the emperor do when the people become restive And when the people are asking questions and when the people don't like the policies of the Emperor, he sends them to the circus. He creates a circus. He builds a giant coliseum, and he begins to throw the Christians to the lions. And he has great chariot races and football games and basketball games, all to keep the idiots preoccupied with things that don't mean anything in the scheme of the entire world so that they don't have the time to learn what the truth is, so they don't ever get smart enough to learn how they're being manipulated, so they don't ever question the emperor.
That's why they pay a player on a football team or a baseball team a $1,000,000 or $2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a year. It is the Roman circus. I know men who don't know anything in the world except who plays third base for the Mets. And they think that's a great accomplishment. And they meet and pat each other on the back and bond and go have cocktails And talk about what this guy, the place, 3rd base for the Mets, did in last night's game.
Sad. It's really sad.
Speaker 0: When radio came along, of first. They use that to the maximum, sports for the men, sports basically for the women. And then in television, as I say, with this alpha state, it's hypnotic state and sure enough around the 1960s, really fifties sixties. It took off. It really, really took off, and men became glued from Sarajanen to the sports shows.
A culture industry which is called by its own the culture industry. The Soviet Union had a department called the culture industry. Their actors and directors were called the cultural leaders. Leaders because they would like a computer. People like computers.
All you have to do is keep giving them new updates every so often. And you can change an entire country or a nation or a block of nations. We're all getting the same uploads, upgrades at the same time along certain paths. Today, we call it political correctness. Most people want to to belong to their peer group.
They want to be the same as everyone else when it comes to opinions. In fact, they judge their own personal sanity by bouncing ideas off their their neighbors and friends who will answer back and agree on these same topics in kind. It doesn't matter if the topics or the of what you're given are facts or or utter nonsense. As long as everyone agrees at the same time. You'll say what I'm saying.
And your friends will all agree because they've had the same information given to them. And it's on TV and a famous face, says something, then it must be true. He doesn't have to show you facts or anything else. You've been brought up with these faces. That's why they keep these guys on television into the seventies and eighties.
You've grown up with this father figure. Who's on television every night at 6 o'clock, in your house, in your room, staring right at you. And he's a father figure. Would he tell you a life. That that's so you naturally never suspect him.
And the same man will lead you through new topics. He'll he'll introduce experts on the topics, but have a little summary at the end of every talk. And you are now left with the conclusion that's presented to you. You don't arrive at it. It's given to you and it's good enough for you.
We're programmed today, perfectly just like machines. We tie this in with the Bracinski. Bracinski said two ages. And this guy was way up with the NSA. He was a he's a master geopolitician.
He works in 20, 50 year periods to do with geopolitics and other countries. But he said himself, the public will shortly be unable to think or reason for themselves. He was meaning by the the form that that of, information that was given to them, the type, the the formulas that were a newsstand in the 19 seventies. It is eventually they'll be unable to think or reason for themselves. And eventually he said that they will expect the media, to do all their thinking and reasoning for them.
Well, that's happened today. That that's why people today can't think outside of the programming from television.
Speaker 3: Is there any room in, in, in the kind of society where these manipulations are not taking place for this type of entertainment or any type of entertainment at all?
Speaker 2: If people understand that a game is a game, if people understand that nobody, nobody, no matter what they do, is worth paying $2,000,000 or $3,000,000 a
Speaker 0: year for.
Speaker 2: People should be able To get rich if they want to. By the sweat of their individual labor. Okay. By going on doing something for the world. Not by taking people's minds away from the Emperor.
It's a game. Football is a game. Football is a game. But let me tell you something. When 150 of the most powerful men and women in the world can meet in secret in Baden Baden, Germany to plot the fate of billions and nobody even cares about it.
But 6 football players go to lunch together and it's in the headlines across the country. You have a reflection of the society in which that exists. And, it is a sick, sick society that is doomed to self destruction.
Speaker 3: So based on that scenario, there's some truth into what these these men are looking at.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And that's what makes me so sick. Is that I'm trying to wake up of people who on a daily basis are proving the ones that I'm warning them about to be right.
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Well, it's so that even though, minority, there are people out there that you recognize are awake to this. If they don't do something about it, they will lose that ability to be free in that way.
Speaker 2: That's correct.
Speaker 3: Whether they might think, well, I don't need to worry about it because I know what I know and I'm fine. It doesn't work that way. There's a connection here. Same.
Speaker 2: That is correct. That is absolutely correct. A nation of people who are willing to send their sons and daughters that they profess that they love to a foreign country to die. And And they use the excuse to themselves that they're sending them off to defend our country and they know damn well that's a lie. They're doomed.
Speaker 0: This is a scientific dictatorship which veteran Russell said. And the Huxley said, both Aldous and Julian Huxley said they would bring in a scientifically controlled society.
Speaker 1: Well now, in regard to this problem of the ultimate revolution, this has been very well summed up by the moderator. In the past, we can say that all revolutions have essentially aimed at changing, the environment in order to change the individual. I mean, there's been the political revolution, the economic revolution, in the time of the reformation, the religious revolution. All these, aimed, as I say, not directly at the human being, but at his surroundings. So that by modifying the surroundings, you did achieve, in, at one remove an effect upon the human being.
Today, we are faced, I think, with the approach of what may be called the ultimate revolution, the final revolution where a man can act directly on, the mind body of his fellows. Well, needless to say, some kind of direct action on human mind bodies has been going on since the beginning of time. But this has generally been, of a violent nature. The techniques of terrorism have been known from time immemorial And people have employed them with more or less ingenuity, sometimes with the utmost crudity, sometimes with A good deal of skill acquired by a process of trial and error of finding out what the best ways of using torture, imprisonment, constraints of various kinds. Well, it seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this, that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which, will enable the controlling oligarchy who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to Get people actually to love their certitude.
This is the, seems to me, the ultimate in malevolent revolution, shall we say. And this is a problem which has interested me for many years and About which I wrote 30 years ago, a fable, the brave new world, which is, essentially the account of a society making use of all the devices at that time available. And some of the devices which, I imagined to be possible, making use of them in order to, first of all, to standardize the population, to iron out inconvenient human differences, to create, so to say, mass produced models of human beings arranged, in some kind of a scientific, caste system. A number of techniques about which I talked seem to be here already. And that there seems to be a general movement, in the direction of this kind of ultimate revolution.
This method of control by which, people can be made to enjoy a state of affairs, which By any decent standard, they ought not to enjoy. This, I mean, the enjoyment of, of servitude.