TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @therealZNO

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 2:04 PM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

They lie. They cheat. They exploit. They censor. They fabricate. They manipulate. They push a self-serving narrative. Power has replaced public service. The perils of government transpire when the corrupt and self-serving are allowed to dictate without consequence. https://t.co/8PvRo56z5J

Video Transcript AI Summary
A massive crime against the constitution occurred, violating the presidential oath. Attendees were urged to march to the Capitol to express their voices. The narrative of a stolen election was perpetuated, leading to a violent base being cultivated. Despite the attack, the call to "fight like hell" continued. Claims of a rigged election were made, prompting supporters to threaten election officials. The Secretary of State in Georgia faced death threats, and the environment became increasingly dangerous. The violence was not condemned; instead, it was incited, leaving many to wonder why there weren't uprisings across the country. The message was clear: the violence would not cease, nor should it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Committed a massive crime against our constitution and our people and the worst violation of the presidential oath of office in the history of the United States of America. Speaker 1: Know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Speaker 0: By telling the mob that their election had been stolen from them. I have an objection because 10 of the 29 electoral votes cast by Florida were cast by electors not lawfully certified. Even then, after that vicious attack, he continued to spread the big lie. Speaker 2: I think it's also critical to understand you can run the best campaign, and you can have the election stolen from you. This was months of cultivating a base of people who were violent. Speaker 3: Oh, thank you. Oh, fuck. What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? What? Speaker 2: Praising that violence. And and everyone beware. They're not gonna let up, and they should not. And he still gave back marching orders and, quote, fight like hell. Speaker 1: Democrats are gonna fight like hell. We're gonna fight Speaker 0: like hell. We'll fight like hell. We'll fight like hell. Speaker 1: But can you imagine telling your supporters that the only way you could possibly lose is if an American election was rigged and stolen from you? Speaker 2: And you could have the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: And ask yourself whether you've ever seen anyone at any level of government make the same claim about their own election. Speaker 2: And you could have the election stolen from you. Speaker 4: And in the months president made these statements, people listened. Armed supporters surrounded election officials' homes. Speaker 3: No threats. No threats. No threats. Speaker 4: The secretary of state The secretary of state for Georgia got death threats. And they were shouting threats, you know, to us, to to kill us. We cannot go outside now. It's become so dangerous for us. When he saw firsthand the violence that his conduct was creating Speaker 2: I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country. Maybe there will be. He didn't condemn the violence. Incited it. So they're not gonna let up, and they should not.
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 4:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that when malevolence is celebrated as martyrdom, we lose sight of justice. Critics point out racial disparities in the case of Daniel Penny's delayed arrest but overlook the repeated releases of Jordan Neely, who had numerous arrests. The narrative labeling Penny as a murderer ignores the context of his actions. Faced with a threat, he acted to protect himself and others. The police response was inadequate, and the justice system failed. Eyewitnesses agree that Neely posed a danger. Penny's actions were those of a brave Marine, yet society punishes those who act heroically.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

When malevolence is hailed as martyrdom, justice is lost. Critics decried “racial disparities” in the delayed arrest and charging of Daniel Penny. Yet, where was this outrage when Jordan Neely, with over 40 arrests, was repeatedly released back onto the streets? Do we call that a “racial disparity”? What about criminals freed on minimal bail, only to endanger others again? Where is the outcry then? We heard accusations of “disproportionate use of force” against Daniel Penny. But Neely was alive when Penny released him, placed in a position of recovery. This dismantles the narrative of Penny as a ruthless “murderer” or “lyncher.” But what kind of force is acceptable when confronted by someone who is presenting himself as a threat, vocalizing his intent to harm, and actively coming at you? Penny acted to protect those on the train, and himself, restraining Neely under immense stress and imminent danger. Should Penny have waited, hoping for dialogue, while danger loomed? Should Penny have waited for Neely to deliver on his threats? And where were the police? Why did they take so long to arrive? Why aren’t subways adequately patrolled? The NYC justice system failed. The eyewitnesses on that train all told the same story: Neely was a danger to himself and everyone on board. What Penny did was heroic. The only “crime” Penny committed was being a brave and selfless Marine who confronted that danger. Democrat-led cities do not protect citizens; they enable chaos, and if you dare to have the courage to do the right thing, you’ll suffer the consequences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An emergency call reports an attack at the Broadway Lafayette train station. A male suspect is described as aggressive and attempting to attack others. Two individuals are restraining him, and no one is injured. Witnesses recount the suspect's erratic behavior, including claiming he doesn't care about the consequences and expressing a willingness to fight. The situation escalated when the suspect charged at people, prompting bystanders to intervene. A man in a brown jacket successfully subdued the attacker, using a secure hold until help arrived. The chaotic scene drew attention from those nearby, with various accounts of the suspect's threats and actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're excluding 911. You need police, fire, or medical. You're sending 911. You're extending 911. You need police, fire, or medical. Hi. We need, a ambulance and car. I mean, we just need a car at Broadway Lafayette Street. Someone's attacking here. That's great. This is inside the train station? Yes. Okay. Broadway Lafayette? Uptown, downtown platform? Uptown. Uptown. Okay. And this is the f. Right? Yeah. Male or female being attacked? I don't know. He just he's trying to attack anybody. Oh, a guy trying to do it. Okay. Give me further description. Blackwater China Asian Indian? He's black. Oh, commercial? They're holding they're holding that down. He's they're holding him down Speaker 1: right now. How many people? Speaker 0: There's just 2. There's what says oh, one one man hold it. White white man holds me down. Mhmm. Hold the opposite side down. Okay. Any weapons? Anybody injured at this time? No. Nobody. Okay. They're coming in as we speak. Speaker 1: What happened? Speaker 0: We got a new It was Speaker 1: It was It was It's it's from the next one. It came like the train. What's that? You got anything else Speaker 2: coming on, sir? Speaker 1: I don't know. I just Yeah. What what happened? Speaker 2: You were saying. Right? Speaker 3: I was in before him. Then he came in, like, he put it, like, his hands so he could come in. Right? I guess he was pissed or something, but I looked at him. Right? And then he started taking off his sweater, dummy hard, and then he threw it. And then he told, like, everyone that he had, like, a birthday and that he don't care what happens today. He don't care about going Speaker 0: to jail, but that someone's Speaker 1: dying to He didn't fight at all? No. He he came on the train. I was sitting right there. I was sitting next to everybody that was moving. That was the last one I sent. He came on the train. He was like, yo, I'm looking for food. I'm looking for this shit. But, like, he's afraid to risk it all. Basically, he was like, like, basically, he's gonna tell the people I can hurt somebody. Every time I hit the door, He's like, I'm ready to hurt the body. I'm ready to do this. And dude, right here, I don't like I said, I don't think he's gonna throw. Everybody moved and he was like, he was like, he he came in and he charged this. Wow. They're trying for some Yeah. He's got a train. He's got a train. Speaker 2: He's got a train. Speaker 1: He's got this phone. He's like, I'm gonna hurt anybody a 100. I'm afraid to go back to market dollar. And dude got up. He got up. He saw him about to hurt somebody. And he got up and he was trying to every time he's running, I don't know what. Speaker 2: I'll see what you're doing. Speaker 1: So you saw me talk, dad? I'm sorry. My way is right here. Yeah. Okay. What what did what did you see? Speaker 2: What did I see? I was sitting in the theater. I heard the young man that's on the floor saying, you know, hey. I'm willing to die. You know? I'll do anything. I'm willing to die. Go to jail. I don't care. I don't care. And he was saying it so loud that everyone turned around. So it's a young man. Speaker 1: Something he held me for a long period of time. Speaker 2: He got belligerence, and he's he tackles him down. Speaker 1: Oh, wait. Okay. How do you just How do you stay Speaker 2: in the brown jacket? The one that just went past. Speaker 1: The guy in the brown jacket? Speaker 0: Yeah. You Speaker 1: got this big Speaker 2: guy in the brown jacket. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: You got it, Davis? What is this for the guys in the freak too? You got a brown jack hand jacket. Take it to the right now, mother. They're taking it away? The street. Hey. Oh, hell. Oh, he took Okay. The guy with a brown jacket took him to the ground. Yeah. Speaker 2: He took to the ground. Okay. Not a hard choke hold. Just enough to secure him and the guy thought. And he kept pulling the hell. Alright? And then there's nobody totally realized what was going on. That's what these guys are, bro. You know? Because when he came in, he was unbelievably a

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

Vid Cred: @TheFP

Saved - September 20, 2024 at 12:20 PM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

@kylenabecker And then there’s Wisconsin… The same Wisconsin that just passed unmonitored ballot boxes again, right before the 2024 Presidential Election. https://t.co/bVV0ry1ifg

Saved - September 17, 2024 at 3:12 PM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

Does anyone else remember when Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, the entirety of the Left, and their media apparatchiks claimed that U.S. Border Patrol agents were racist for trying to stop ~14K illegals, in this one incident, from entering into our country? I do. https://t.co/Om4qyLIohz

Saved - June 17, 2024 at 9:52 PM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

@CollinRugg E. Jean Carroll is a nut job. This is the woman that accused Trump of rape. Complete looney tune. https://t.co/9w8IHkri8M

Video Transcript AI Summary
I call this place the Mouse House where distinguished mice like Kahneman and Taburski live. My shed holds books that influenced me. The door lists my dogs' names. I painted rocks blue to show where rivers once flowed. I painted trees and a forest. The best advice I've given is to eat, drink, and be merry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I called the mouse house because some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taburski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door are the list of my dogs, Marquee, Fortuna de la Spunky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry. And, it's so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon, I've done this whole forest. Oh my god. What's the best piece of advice I've ever given? What a horrible question to ask an advice to. Oh my god. Hang on. Eat, drink, and be merry. That's it. That's my advice.
Saved - June 8, 2024 at 3:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Theodore Roosevelt's letter emphasizes the importance of Americanism even after the war. He believes that immigrants should be treated equally if they become true Americans. He opposes segregation and divided allegiance, stating that there is only room for the American flag, English language, and loyalty to the American people.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 A Letter from Theodore Roosevelt to Richard M. Hurd, January 3rd, 1919, emphasizing the importance of Americanism: “I cannot be with you and so all I can do is to wish you God speed. There must be no sagging back in the fight for Americanism merely because the war is over. There are plenty of persons who have already made the assertion that they believe the American people have a short memory and that they intend to revive all the foreign associations which most directly interfere with the complete Americanization of our people. Our principle in this matter should be absolutely simple. In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn’t doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile. We have room for but one language here and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

Saved - January 19, 2024 at 1:23 PM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

There was no fraud in Fulton County. Nothing to see here. None whatsoever. Zero fraud.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

NEW: Fulton County defense attorneys move to withdraw from 2020 election case amid questions about "missing" ballots https://beckernews.com/trouble-in-fulton-county-high-powered-defense-attorneys-move-to-withdraw-amid-questions-about-2020-ballots/

Trouble in Fulton County? High-Powered Defense Attorneys Move to Withdraw Amid Questions About 2020 Ballots There's trouble in Fulton County, Georgia as two high-powered criminal defense attorneys have suddenly filed a motion to withdraw from a 2020 election case. Criminal Defense Attorneys Donald F. Samuel and Amanda R. Clark Palmer have motioned to withdraw themselves from the Favorito v. Wan case, according to the motion. Rasmussen speculated that the lawyers beckernews.com
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 7:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maine has made a decision to remove President Trump from the 2024 Presidential ballot. Three challenges were presented, including claims of insurrection and rebellion against the US. The Secretary of State found Trump's primary petition invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision is suspended until SCOTUS rules on any appeal.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨👨‍⚖️ Maines Decision to Remove President Trump from 2024 Presidential Ballot: There are three challenges: Royal & Rosen Challenge: Claims Trump engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. Gordon Challenge: Argues Trump is barred from office under the Twenty-Second Amendment, claiming Trump has stated he won the 2020 election, implying he is ineligible for a third term (DISMISSED). The Secretary of State, Shenna Bellows, concluded that Trump's primary petition is invalid, finding that he is not qualified to hold the office of President under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision, like the Colorado ruling, will be suspended until SCOTUS rules on any appeal to this decision, or the time to appeal has expired.

Saved - December 30, 2023 at 7:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts highlight a pattern of corruption and abuse of power by the government, targeting various individuals and groups who dissent from the established narrative. This includes politicians, whistleblowers, journalists, medical professionals, entrepreneurs, parents, conservatives, the unvaccinated, and influencers. Opposing the narrative makes one a target.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

We are witnessing a corrupt administration and government weaponize their authority, targeting Americans, in a desperate attempt to maintain control. - A President has been targeted because of his dissenting voice. - Political opponents have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Whistleblowers have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Journalists have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Medical Professionals have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Entrepreneurs have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Parents have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Conservatives have been target because of their dissenting voices. - The Unvaccinated have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. - Influencers have been targeted because of their dissenting voices. When you oppose the narrative, you become the target.

Saved - December 22, 2023 at 7:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Old Twitter marked, flagged, and removed President Trump's video on January 6th. In the video, he called for peace, urged citizens to go home, and emphasized the importance of law and order. He expressed love for the people and urged them to go home peacefully.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🍊🇺🇸🔊 Always remember that Old Twitter marked, flagged, and eventually removed President Trump’s video on January 6th, over a “disputed” claim of election fraud, in which he called for peace and told citizens to go home. “You have to go home now. We have to have peace, we have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt.” “We can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special.” “I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your pain and hurt. The election was stolen from us, even though it was a landslide victory. We need to go home now and prioritize peace, law, and order. We must respect our law enforcement and avoid anyone getting hurt. This is an unprecedented time where our democracy was undermined, but we can't fall into their trap. We need to go home peacefully. We appreciate and care for you. You've witnessed the mistreatment of others who are wicked, but it's important to go home in peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where Such a thing happened where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very Special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 1:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk asked Alex Jones about the Sandy Hook situation in a clip. Alex Jones gave an in-depth response, which can be found in the full clip from 54:36 to 1:01:19.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🗣️🔊 For those criticizing Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) for not addressing the question about Sandy Hook, here is the clip where Elon Musk’s (@elonmusk) very first question, upon entering the room, was directed at Alex Jones regarding this specific topic. Elon: “One of the question I really have to get out of the way…is the whole Sandy Hook thing…what exactly did you say and what is going on with that situation?” Alex Jones proceeds to give an in-depth response, his “medium answer”, around Sandy Hook. Start: 54:36 End: 1:01:19 Full clip below:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is Alex Jones, who is being interviewed by Elon Musk. Alex addresses the controversy surrounding his comments about the Sandy Hook school shooting. He explains that he covered the opinions of others who believed it was a drill, but he himself believes the shooting happened. He mentions a PR firm that brought up the issue again, resulting in negative media coverage. Alex clarifies that he never made money from the controversy and apologizes for any confusion caused. He criticizes how his words were twisted and misrepresented by the media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, Alex, you know, I look. I I honestly don't know don't really know you and you don't know me. But, you know, I one of the questions I really have to just get out of the way, and I and you you've probably talked about this already before, is the whole Sandy Hook thing. And, and, you know, because it's not like, obviously, if, this, you know, if somebody's sort of denying or that murders of children, that's not cool, at all. This, you know. And so just what exactly did did you say, and and and and what what is going on with that sit situation? You know? I just I would like to actually this here, what you what you what did you say and and and yeah. Speaker 1: Well, well, Elon, thank you for allowing me back into the public this Square so that I can actually tell the world what really happened. So and I hope this is the last time. I'm happy to It's Speaker 0: probably not the last time. That I have. But still Speaker 1: this. Okay. It's I don't know how much would you like the short answer or the medium answer? Or the long answer? Speaker 0: I think I think at least the medium answer, Look. I guess people just wanna know, like, obviously, it it it would be, like, heartless and cruel to deny, a a a school shooting of children, this, or to attack the parents or anyone who is involved. It seems that that would be, you know, just this incredibly mean and cruel, frankly. So it's sort of that's that's, I think, you know, what a lot of people this, are upset about, or at least they think that is the reason for you upset about. And, you know, if that were true, I think we would rightly this rightly, but, you know, upset with you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes, sir. Well, please let me then just tell you what really happened. This. Okay. And and if you want me to send you a dossier with clips and videos and articles I Speaker 0: mean, post it to your account. You know? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. I will do that. So so let me this. Let me tell you what happened. I'm a guy that didn't go to college. I've been a few years community college. I started out on Access TV 29 years ago. This. I was not professionally trained, and by 19 by 2016, I I had 30,000,000 viewers and listeners today conservatively. I was the biggest show. It was big as Rogan is now or bigger. And I had a very small operation this and did not even understand how powerful I was. And so when that event, I just call it the school shooting, which I do believe happened, this happened 11 years ago. The Internet exploded, and it was a top story for off and on for years with all the with all this. These, professors and former school safety people and and all of them saying they believed it was a drill, and I this. Simply covered them covering that. What was entered in court against me in in both cases where I was found guilty by judges, kinda like in New York, there's a judge in in this. In Trump's case, not even a jury, in his real estate case. And and then years later, this. After Trump got elected and after I was deplatformed, it made me bigger. And so suddenly, I would wake up and there would be sometimes a 100 articles or more a day, this. Every major news channel saying that I was currently saying nobody died, currently sending people to their houses, this. Currently peeing on graves. I don't even know these people's names. I only said one of their names ever. Now now and I'm and I believe their children died, and and I understand Speaker 0: all that. Okay. Speaker 1: This. What I'm saying, imagine I was not eplatform, no mention of of of the school shooting in Connecticut for for, this Like, 6, 7 years. Then they go back to my timeline, and it turns out it was a big New York PR firm, Democratic Party. This. They dredge it up. They run hundreds of articles, sometimes a day, but a week for over a year. This. Suddenly, it becomes a big story again. Speaker 0: What's the PR firm? Pardon me? Which which propaganda firm was this? About this PR is a public relations is a propaganda word for propaganda. So I think we should call this. PR firms, propaganda firms, because that is in fact what they do. So what propaganda firm are those? Speaker 1: I will find the name as soon as I'm off because I can't do this. I'm not good at doing today's at once, so I can't walk into bubblegum. But I will post it to the, two two x. Because this. After they got their $1,500,000,000 judgment and asked for 2,670,000,000,000, that the the GDP of India, this. Not joking, folks. That's Bloomberg. They then came out and bragged that they had quarterbacks the whole thing. They're they're one of the biggest state of the UN's PR. This. Not that that they had quarterbacks, quote, destroying Alex Jones. And so I did question it. This. I did say at times I could see that I'm not even saying it now. They'll take it out of context to say it again. I did have what they entered in court on me was 23 minutes this of video and audio over 5, 6 years. We did an audit. I hadn't talked about them when they sued me this. For 2 years, I refused to talk about it. I apologized when the PR firm got involved. And I know who it was at the time. It was just all the news. I said, hey, I this. Thought Speaker 0: it happened. Speaker 1: I said it happened. I said it happened. I decided it happened 5 years after it happened. So I said, I'm not the Sandy Hook guy. This. It turns out some of these experts that said it didn't happen are crazy. They made up stuff. I said, I believe it happened. This. And then they spun it and said, oh, now he admits he lied about it. So it it it isn't who I was. It's kinda like they've done with you, and you did nothing like I did. I mean, I did question it. I did say a few times that I thought it hadn't happened. But I but I didn't turn the knife. I didn't really think about it. I thought about how I was talking about the Internet this. With YouTube videos with 30, 40,000,000 views that I didn't make Sure. Speaker 0: It was a Speaker 1: hot topic that that would come back from time to time. But but, no, I was not this. Creator of it. I was not the progenitor of it. I was not the guy pushing it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And then I kept saying, no. I believe it happened. And they went, this. You now admit you lied for money. So what's not true is I never made any money off of it. I barely ever covered it. It's not my identity, this. And it's just like they misrepresent what you say. Take one little thing and twist it and and and then say you need to apologize for it, this. And then they just keep hammering it and hammering it and hammering and hammering it. So
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 9:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The new Netflix special, 'Leave The World Behind', produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, explores weaponized cyber attacks and a global communications breakdown. Recent reports suggest China's cyber army infiltrating vital U.S. services. Some may view this as 'predictive programming', but it's just my speculation. In other news, both Rumble and Netflix experienced service issues but are now getting back online.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

‼️😵‍💫 The new Netflix special, ‘Leave The World Behind’, produced by Barack and Michelle Obama, is about weaponized cyber attacks and a “global communications breakdown”. Fox News just reported that China’s cyber army is infiltrating vital U.S. services, such as water utilities, power grids, pipelines, ports, etc. If I were to put on my tinfoil hat, I would say this is a playbook attempt at ‘predictive programming’. It’s not like there was any ‘predictive programming’ around the COVID pandemic, and the WEF definitely didn’t put out a video warning us about a ‘cyber pandemic’ a few years back. This is just my “conspiracy theorist” talking. I'm sure it’s nothing. No worries.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Amanda meets someone who warns her about the patterns governing the world and the impending danger. They discuss the infiltration of critical US services by hackers affiliated with China's People's Liberation Army. The goal seems to be to create chaos in logistical systems and collect information that could be weaponized in a conflict. The targets include Texas's power grid, a water utility in Hawaii, a West Coast port, and oil and gas pipelines. The Chinese cyber army aims to disrupt or destroy critical infrastructure to prevent US power projection into Asia and cause societal chaos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So sorry to bother you. You must be Amanda. Why did you come here? In my line of work, you have to understand the patterns that govern the World. That can help you see the future. And I knew something was coming. I don't understand. What do you mean? The fact that we are seeing ongoing across the country. The truth is much scarier. What is the truth? We're gonna be okay. Right? Aren't you the one who always said if you're not Paranoid by now? It's too late. Haven't you been picking up on what's going on out there? We've all been deserted. There is no going back to normal. Reveals hackers affiliated with China's People's Liberation Army have infiltrated critical services here in the US. Alexandra Hoff joins us now from our nation's capital. Alex, this is not good. No. It's not. I mean, this infiltration appears to be part of a broader effort to insert chaos into our logistical systems, the information collected could then be weaponized if the US and China were to become engaged directly in the Pacific. According to reporting from the Washington Post setting multiple US and industry security officials, China's cyber army is invading critical US services, like An attempt to break into the system behind Texas's independent power grid. Other victims include a water utility in Hawaii, a West Coast port, and at least 1 oil and gas Pipeline according to that report you're seeing there. Brandon Wells, executive director of the Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity Agency, told The Washington Post this, quote, It is very clear that Chinese attempts to compromise critical infrastructure are in part to preposition themselves to be able to disrupt or destroy that Critical infrastructure in the event of a conflict to either prevent the United States from being able to project power into Asia Or to cause societal chaos inside the United States to affect our decision making around a crisis.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

No big deal. Nothing to see here. 👀🥱 https://t.co/0eLDi6Hkfo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 pandemic has shown us how vulnerable we are to biological threats, but we are overlooking similar risks in the digital world. A cyber attack with COVID-like characteristics would spread faster and further than any biological virus, with a reproductive rate 10 times greater than the coronavirus. While cyberattacks haven't impacted our health like pandemics, they have caused significant economic damage. To stop the exponential spread of a cyber threat, we need to quickly disconnect vulnerable devices from each other and the Internet. A single day without the Internet would cost economies over $50 billion. As the digital realm merges with our physical world, cyberattacks on essential services like transportation and healthcare pose even greater risks. We need to be better prepared for this digital equivalent of a pandemic. The time to act is now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID nineteen pandemic has shaken our economies and societies to the core and shown us how vulnerable we are to biological threats. In the digital world, similar risks are being overlooked right now. A cyber attack with COVID like characteristics would spread faster and further than any biological virus. Its reproductive rate would be around 10 times greater than what we've experienced with the coronavirus. To give you an idea, one of the fastest worms in history, the 2003 Slammer Sapphire 1 doubled in size approximately every 8.5 seconds, infecting over 75,000 devices in 10 minutes and almost 11,000,000 devices in 24 hours. Fortunately, at least until now, cyberattacks have not impacted our health the way pandemics have, but the economic damages, and therefore, the impact they have had on our daily lives, have been equal, and sometimes even greater. You see, the only way to stop the exponential propagation of a COVID like cyber threat is to fully connect the millions of vulnerable devices from one another and from the Internet. All of this in a matter of days. A single day without the Internet would cost our economies more than 50,000,000,000 US dollars, and that's before considering the economic and societal damages should these devices be linked to essential services, such as transport or health care, as the digital realm increasingly merges with our physical world, the ripple effects of cyberattacks on our safety just keep on expanding at a faster paced than what we're preparing for. COVID nineteen was known as an anticipated risk. So is the digital Lequivalent, let's be better prepared for that one. The time is now.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

👀⁉️ Rumble and Netflix both experienced issues with their service today. It seems they are finally getting back online. https://t.co/10F80SuXwa

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 7:51 AM

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

@CollinRugg @alx Trump is the only viable option. Always has been, always will be. Trump 2024 🇺🇸 https://t.co/nFCplM15Ld

Video Transcript AI Summary
If by Rudyard Kipling, a poem about maintaining composure amidst chaos, emphasizes the importance of self-trust and patience. It advises against succumbing to hatred or arrogance. The poem encourages not letting dreams consume one's life, but rather, to think critically and face both success and failure with equanimity. It emphasizes the need to endure hardships, rebuild what is broken, and take risks without dwelling on losses. The poem also highlights the value of integrity, humility, and the ability to connect with people from all walks of life. It concludes by stating that those who can make the most of every moment and embody these qualities will find success and become true men.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If by Rudyard Kipling If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you. If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, but make allowance for their doubting too. If you can wait and not be tired by waiting. Or being lied about, don't deal in lies. For being hated, don't give way to hating. And yet don't look too good nor talk too wise. If you can dream and not make dreams your master, if you can think and not make thoughts your end, if you can meet with triumph and disaster and treat those 2 impostors just the same, if you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken, twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, or watch the things you gave your life to broken, and stoop and build them up with worn out tools. If you can make one heap of all your winnings, and risk it on one turn of pitch and toss, and booz and start again at your beginnings and never breathe a word about your loss, if you can force your heart and nerve and sinew to serve your turn long after they are gone, and so hold on when there is nothing in you except the will which says to them, hold on. If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue, or walk with kings nor lose the common touch. If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, if all men count with you, but none too much, if you can fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds' worth of distance run, yours is the earth and everything that's in it. And, which is more, you'll be a man, my son.
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 4:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
X Corp. is suing Media Matters for America and writer Eric Hananoki over allegations of misrepresentation, manipulated images, intentional damage, selective following, excessive scrolling, omission in reporting, and privacy settings manipulation. X Corp. claims interference with contracts, business disparagement, and interference with prospective economic advantage. The case has subject matter and personal jurisdiction, with desired outcomes including compensation, injunctions, and recovery of costs. Legal analysis focuses on defamation, business disparagement, contractual interference, and prospective economic advantage.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨🧵 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP. V. MEDIA MATTERS: Plaintiff: X Corp., a Nevada corporation operating the X social media platform (formerly Twitter). Defendant: Media Matters for America, a DC-based media watchdog. Additional Defendant: Eric Hananoki, a writer for Media Matters, domiciled in Maryland.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP. V. MEDIA MATTERS: - Allegations Against Media Matters - 1. Misrepresentation of X Corp. Platform: Media Matters accused of maliciously portraying X Corp.’s platform as dominated by extreme content. 2. Manipulated Images: Allegedly manufactured images showing advertisers’ posts next to extremist content to mislead viewers. 3. Intention to Damage: Aimed to alienate advertisers from X Corp. and harm its business. 4. Selective Following and Manipulation: Media Matters accused of manipulating its X account to create misleading ad/content pairings. 5. Excessive Scrolling and Refreshing: Allegedly engaged in unnatural user behavior to generate desired ad/content pairings. 6. Omission in Reporting: Failed to disclose the manipulated and rare nature of the content pairings. 7. Impact on Advertisers: Many advertisers, misled by the report, withdrew their ads from X. 8. Privacy Settings Manipulation: Used privacy settings to hide its methodology from the public.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP V. MEDIA MATTERS: - Legal Claims by X Corp. - 1. Interference with Contract: Accuses Media Matters of intentionally disrupting its contracts with advertisers. 2. Business Disparagement: Claims Media Matters disparaged X Corp.'s product quality through false statements. 3. Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage: Alleges wrongful conduct by Media Matters disrupted potential economic benefits.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP V. MEDIA MATTERS: - Jurisdiction and Venue - 1. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Based on diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy exceeding $75,000. 2. Personal Jurisdiction: Over Media Matters due to its campaign's targeted impact on Texas, where X Corp. has significant business. 3. Venue: Deemed proper in the district where significant parts of the events occurred.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP V. MEDIA MATTERS: - Desired Legal Outcomes for X Corp. - 1. Compensation for damages caused by the defendants' actions. 2. Injunctions to remove the disputed article from all platforms controlled by Media Matters. 3. Recovery of litigation costs and attorneys’ fees. Any other relief deemed just and proper by the court.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKDOWN OF X CORP V. MEDIA MATTERS: - Legal Analysis - 1. Defamation and Business Disparagement: Central to the case is whether Media Matters’ actions constituted defamation or business disparagement, which requires proving the falsity of the statements and malicious intent. 2. Contractual Interference: X Corp. must demonstrate that Media Matters intentionally and knowingly interfered with its contractual relationships. 3. Prospective Economic Advantage: X Corp. needs to show that Media Matters' actions directly led to the loss of potential economic benefits.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

Full Docket below: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454/gov.uscourts.txnd.383454.1.0_1.pdf

Complaint – #1 in X Corp. (N.D. Tex., 4:23-cv-01175) – CourtListener.com COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by X Corp.. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-14187784) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the Judges Copy Requirements and Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Sullivan, John) (Entered: 11/20/2023) courtlistener.com
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 10:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The RESTRICT Act, similar to the IEEPA, grants the government power to regulate commerce during national emergencies. However, it introduces separate sanctions managed by the Secretary of Commerce. The Act's ambiguous definition of "interest" raises concerns about potential restrictions on cryptocurrency transactions. Additionally, it lacks proper oversight and may infringe on constitutional rights, such as free speech and protection against unreasonable searches. The Act's reporting requirements for crypto brokers could violate the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, while excessive penalties may violate the Eighth Amendment. Furthermore, the Act raises worries about government surveillance, censorship, and the seizure of private possessions without due process. It is crucial for citizens to protect their freedoms and ensure that their representatives uphold the Constitution.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

THE RESTRICT ACT THREAD 🧵: 1/The RESTRICT Act will have a significant impact on our freedom and rights. First, look at the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The IEEPA is a US federal law that authorizes the president to regulate commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual or extraordinary foreign threat to national security, foreign policy, or economy.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

2/The RESTRICT Act operates on a similar concept as IEEPA, where OFAC is authorized to prevent US citizens from conducting business with foreign individuals subject to sanctions. However, the RESTRICT Act establishes a separate set of sanctions managed by the Secretary of Commerce in addition to those overseen by the Treasury Secretary through OFAC.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

3/Like IEEPA, the RESTRICT Act instructs the Secretary of Commerce to prohibit transactions involving foreign adversaries. Yet, the issue lies in the ambiguous definition of "interest," as the Secretary may contend that all cryptocurrency transactions, such as Bitcoin, fall under the category of transactions in which US foreign adversaries have a stake.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

4/In the IEEPA, the "Berman Amendments" present legal exemptions that resemble the 1st Amendment and enable individuals to challenge OFAC sanctions that affect free speech by asserting that OFAC went beyond its authority under the Amendments, rather than asserting that IEEPA violates the Constitution.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

5/Conversely, the RESTRICT Act lacks a defined restriction and focuses on transactions linked to information and technology, rendering it unconstitutional. Unfettered and discretionary power to ban and disrupt various information technologies cannot be exercised without proper oversight and scrutiny.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

6/The RESTRICT Act not only fails to ensure these legal safeguards but also aims to undermine them. This is not just a statutory challenge but a constitutional one that concerns safeguarded speech.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

7/You can argue that the requirement for crypto brokers to report transactions over $10,000 to the IRS would violate the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government would effectively be requiring brokers to report private financial information without a warrant or probable cause.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

8/The RESTRICT Act would require brokers to report cost basis information for crypto transactions, which could be used against individuals in tax audits or legal proceedings. This could be seen as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

9/Also, if the penalties for failing to comply with the reporting requirements are deemed excessive or disproportionate, it could also be argued that they violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

10/Furthermore, the power to regulate financial transactions is not explicitly granted to the federal government in the constitution and is therefore reserved to the states or the people under the 10th amendment.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

11/The potential for heightened government surveillance is a primary worry. The proposed bill would grant law enforcement agencies access to our online actions without a warrant, leading to an infringement of our privacy without proper legal procedures, again, violating our Fourth Amendment rights. For instance, envision being probed for a crime solely due to some harmless internet searches, with no proof of any actual wrongdoing.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

12/An additional concern is the possibility of censorship and curtailment of free speech. The proposed law could mandate social media networks to supervise and take down content considered "extremist" or "harmful" without clear explanations of what qualifies as such content. This may lead to the suppression of dissenting viewpoints and restrict our capacity to express ourselves openly. For instance, as we’ve seen with the Twitter Files, consider the same scenario where a post expressing opposing dissent with the government's policies gets removed.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

13/Moreover, the proposed law could bestow the government with the authority to seize private possessions without proper legal procedures. Which would lead to the appropriation of assets without a warrant, infringing on our Fifth Amendment right to due process. For instance, imagine a scenario where your cryptocurrency gets seized without any proof of illicit behavior, solely due to the government's suspicion of “wrongdoing”.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

14/Lastly, this proposed law would result in the deprivation of the right to a just trial. The legislation would permit the use of unlawfully obtained evidence, which again, would further undermine our Fourth Amendment privileges. This could lead to the conviction of individuals based on dubious evidence. For example, where evidence is obtained through surveillance conducted without a warrant and is used to find someone guilty of a crime.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

END/It is our duty as American citizens to be watchful in safeguarding our personal freedoms. The proposed law would potentially have a substantial effect on our autonomy and entitlements, and it is our obligation to make certain that our opinions are expressed in the public discourse. We must insist that our chosen representatives uphold the Constitution and safeguard our essential rights, rather than relinquishing them in the guise of security or political convenience.

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 5:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden's political career spans over 47 years, with notable moments including his support for school segregation in 1977 and a failed presidential campaign in 1988 due to plagiarism. In 1994, he authored the controversial "Crime Bill." From 2020 to 2023, his presidency faced challenges like a rigged election, Afghanistan withdrawal issues, and supply chain shortages. Other concerns include energy dependence, high inflation, and record gas prices. The article ends with a mention of ongoing controversies and the possibility of future conflicts.

@therealZNO - ZNO 🇺🇸

🚨‼️ RECAP: Biden’s 47+ years of accomplishments: 1973 - Biden enters politics. 1974 1975 1976 1977 - Biden fights to keep schools segregated because “allowing blacks to integrate would create a racial jungle”. 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 - Ran for President but ended campaign after getting caught plagiarizing. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 - Writes the “Crime Bill” (do I need to go into detail on this? lmao) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 - Hi, keep reading… 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2008 - Calls Obama an “articulate” and “clean” person. 2009 2010 - Eulogizes former KKK recruiter, Robert C. Byrd. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 - Called service members “stupid bastards”. 2017 2018 2019 - Tells Americans “I'm not working for you! Don’t be such a horse's a**!”. 2020 - 2023: Rigged the Election Botched Afghanistan Withdrawal $80B+ in military equipment to Taliban Record High Spending Bills Supply Chain Shortages Energy Dependent Re-entered Paris Agreement Admitted to No COVID Plan Falls Upstairs Gave Amnesty to 11M+ Illegal Immigrants Record High Inflation Record High Gas Prices Historic Low Petroleum Reserves Lowest K-12 Test Scores in a Decade Falls off Bike Cancelled Women Fentanyl Crisis $200B to Ukraine Trips over Sandbag Classified Documents Cocaine in WH Normalization of Pedophilia Child Mutilation $6B to Iran Record High American CC Debt Record Homicide Rates Most Vacations Taken DOJ Weaponization Open Southern Border Hunter Biden. 2024 – TBD (High probability of WWIII).

Saved - October 13, 2023 at 5:40 PM

@RaymondZino - ZNO 🇺🇸

Are you paying attention yet? The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion - Yuri Bezmenov (1984)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the process of ideological subversion, which aims to change Americans' perception of reality so they cannot defend themselves or their country. This brainwashing process occurs over four stages: demoralization, education of generations with enemy ideology, the rise of those graduates to positions of power, and the inability to change their mindset. The speaker predicts that those who have been programmed will eventually revolt against the Marxist Leninist regime. They also mention that the demoralization process in the United States is already complete due to a lack of moral standards. The speaker warns that unless a new generation is educated, it will take 15 to 20 years to restore patriotism. The next stages are destabilization, crisis, and normalization, which could lead to a government with dictators and the elimination of free market competition. The speaker emphasizes that the United States is in a state of war against its own principles and foundations. They urge Americans to wake up before it's too late.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing, process, which goes very slow, and it's divided in 4 basic stages. The first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years, which requires to, educate 1 generation of students in the country of of of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxist Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of, of, of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result, the result you can see, most of the people who graduated in sixties, dropouts, or half baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people, you have you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and and and, common common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interest of the, of the United States society. Speaker 1: And yet these people who've been programmed, and as you say, in place and who are favorable to An opening with the Soviet concept. These are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country. Speaker 0: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock when when they will see in future what the what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously, they will revolt. They they they will, they they will be very unhappy, frustrated people. And the Marxist Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. They, obviously, they will join the links of dissenters dissidents. Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in in future Marxist Leninist America. Here, you can you can get popular, like, Daniel Ellsberg, and filthy rich, like Jane Fonda for being dissident, for criticizing your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality. This, they don't understand, and, it will be greatest shock for them, of course. The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years. Actually, it's overfulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously, not even Comrad von Drokhov and and all his experts would would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he he's going to receive a kick in the in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his then he will understand, but not before that. That's the tragic of the situation of demoralization. So, basically, America is stuck with with demoralization. And unless, Even if if you start right now here, this minute, you start educating new generation of Americans. It will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of, of ideological perception of reality, back to normal normalcy and and, patriotism. The next stage is destabilization. This time, subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption. Whether you eat junk food and get fat and flab, it doesn't matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation. It's what what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as as, defense and economy, the influence of Marxist Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed, in this part of the world, that the process will go that fast. The next stage, of course, is crisis. It it may take only up to 6 weeks to to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now. And after crisis with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have so called the period of normalization. It may last indefinitely. Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 68, comrade Brezhnev said, now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized. This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on earth, to to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a big brother government in Washington DC with the benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of thing, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of of new generation of Soviet assassins. Never mind. He will create false illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is not under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime, falls. United States is in the state of war, undeclared total war against the basic principles, and the foundations of of this system. And and the initiator of this war is not Comrade Dondropov, of course. It's it's the system. However ridiculous it may sound, the world communist system or the world communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot. If if you are not scared by now, Nothing can scare you. But you don't have to be paranoid about it. What what actually happens now that unlike myself, you have literally several years to live on unless United States wake up. That the time bomb is ticking. With every 2nd, the disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to, unless you want to live in nontactical opinions. This is it. This is the last country of freedom and and possibility.
Saved - October 7, 2023 at 8:52 PM

@RaymondZino - ZNO 🇺🇸

@RaymondZino - ZNO 🇺🇸

President Trump’s foreign policy on Israel: • brokered a peace deal, “The Abraham Accords”, between Israel, UAE, and Bahrain. • recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel & moved the American embassy there. • unveiled the “Peace to Prosperity” peace plan to solve the…

Saved - September 27, 2023 at 2:19 PM

@RaymondZino - ZNO 🇺🇸

We were lied to from the very beginning.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccinations are highly effective against COVID-19 and prevent hospitalization and death. They also reduce transmission, allowing society to return to normal. Fully vaccinated individuals no longer need to wear masks or practice physical distancing. However, vaccines only slightly reduce transmission, and there is a risk of waning immunity over time. Israel has observed this waning immunity, leading to the recommendation for booster shots. It is advised for every adult to receive a booster shot. Overall, vaccines are a worthwhile investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 1: These vaccines are highly, highly effective. Speaker 2: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 1: They're really, really good against variants. Speaker 3: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but Reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 2: Get your 1st shot and when you're due for your 2nd, get your 2nd shot. Speaker 3: Our key goal is to stop the transmission to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no infection going on whatsoever. Speaker 1: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 0: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized. You're not gonna be in ICU unit and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 2: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, Without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission. Speaker 3: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. Mission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduced the transmission. We need a new way of doing the Speaker 1: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level as The level of virus in the nasal barrington of an unvaccinated person. Speaker 2: Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggests increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early. Speaker 1: And if you look at Israel, which is always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us. They are seeing A waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalizations and to some extent, death. The booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have. Plan Speaker 0: is for every as well, every adult to get a booster shot. Speaker 3: Clearly, one of the best investments, I've ever been involved in.
View Full Interactive Feed