TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @thevivafrei
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference MikeBenzCyber on Joe Rogan, summarizing the Epstein cover-up: “limited hangout” — releasing tiny, insignificant details to shield a crumbling narrative. I call the judicial correlative “limited prosecution,” aimed at hiding a broader conspiracy. The limited prosecution is the cover-up.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
This is the most important two minutes of @MikeBenzCyber on @joerogan that perfectly summarizes the Epstein cover-up. There is the concept of “limited hangout”, where in order to protect a crumbling narrative, small pieces of insignificant information are released. I’m coining the term “limited prosecution” as the judicial correlative: limited prosecution to prevent disclosure of the broader conspiracy. The limited prosecution is the cover-up.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker connects Jeffrey Epstein to a broad web of influence and alleged illicit activity across several decades. Key points presented:
- Epstein’s involvement is linked to the BCCI network, and to foreign policy activities in the Middle East during the 1990s, plus his alleged ties to high-level officials across Israeli, Saudi, British, and French governments, spanning the Clinton era into the early 2000s.
- Epstein was investigated by the SEC in the 1980s and was one of the two people who ran the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history at that time, tied to the Towers Financial collapse. Epstein’s business partner went to jail for twenty-something years, while Epstein allegedly “skates completely free.”
- He is said to have been involved in a billion-dollar fraud case in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with allegations that his campaigns funded local politicians there and that prosecutors answered to those politicians.
- The speaker suggests Epstein’s pervasive presence—“always in the room” in four decades of American foreign policy and intelligence activity—implies a systemic concern about money sourcing for that activity.
- Regarding Epstein’s crimes, the concern cited is the same one discussed with Orlando Massfer: don’t bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way.
- This culminated in the 2006 indictment, which was described as a “sweetheart plea deal” that limited prosecutions, protected coconspirators known and unknown, and allowed the case to proceed quickly before a full trial could uncover broader lines of evidence about Epstein’s network.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The point I'm getting to here is given Jeffrey Epstein's involvement in the BCCI network, given Jeffrey's involvement in the nineteen nineties with all the foreign policy activities happening in The Middle East at that time, given Jeffrey Epstein's, you know, involvement through, you know, the the early two thousands Clinton era and everything, given his involvement in everything from Israeli to Saudi to British to French high level government officials, can you Jeffrey Epstein was investigated by the the SEC in in the nineteen eighties. He was one he was one of the two people who part who ran the biggest Ponzi scheme in history at the time in The United States, the towers financial collapse. Epstein's business partner goes to jail for like thirty years or twenty years or whatever. But Epstein skates completely free. Epstein gets involved in this huge fraud in The US Virgin Islands with this, you know, like, billion dollar fraud case in The US Virgin Islands.
Never prosecute for any of it. Why is that? Well, one is, you know, he may have con we know in The US Virgin Islands case, was sponsoring the campaigns basically of the politicians there. The prosecutors answered to the politicians. Could be that.
But it I would be shocked if there in forty years of this where's Waldo Forrest Gump, he's always in the room in forty years of American foreign policy and intelligence activity, you know, money sourcing for that. For all the crimes that Epstein committed, the concern was the same one they had with Orlando Massfer. Don't bring the case, and if you do, bring it in a highly limited way. And that's exactly what happened in 2006, the first time he was indicted. Everybody was up in arms that it was a sweetheart plea deal.
It limited it gave protection to all coconspirators known and unknown. And and it was swooped in quickly before, you know, there was a trial in full so that lines of evidence couldn't be opened about the network.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reading New Brunswick law that allows organ removal after death has not yet occurred if a physician says death is imminent from injury or disease. I’m told you don’t need to be dead to have organs harvested, and who will be carved up while still not dead—the most vulnerable people with no voice in the hospital.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Understand what you are reading here. Read the words. Then read them again. This is actual law in New Brunswick, Canada, as related to presumptive organ donation. "17: The Chief Coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue after the death of a person notwithstanding that death has not yet occurred if: (a) in the opinion of a physician the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or disease" You don't need to be dead to have your organs harvested. And who do you think will be carved up while still *not dead*? The most vulnerable people of society with no voice in the hospital to protect them.
reSee.it AI Summary
I will be a troll to the RCMP until they block me or arrest me. Or both. I urge everyone to reply to every RCMP post with a picture of the ostrich missing its head, beheaded under their 'keeping the peace.' Ask them: did they cut the head off or let it happen?
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
I will be a troll to the @rcmpgrcpolice until they block me or arrest me. Or both. I encourage everyone to respond to every single post from the RCMP terrorist organization with a picture of the ostrich missing ahead. An ostrich that was beheaded under their purported “keeping the peace”. Just ask them why the ostrich is missing a head. Did they cut the head off? Or did they just allow it to happen under their “keeping the peace”?
reSee.it AI Summary
A user contrasts warmth from waking with desire for apologies after policies restricting unjabbed from planes and airports in June 2022. The reply accuses the other of denial, then acknowledges that private, federally regulated venues imposed the restrictions, and expresses cynicism at the stance. DominicCardy’s silence is noted as of today.
@LionAdvocacy - Lion Advocacy
The sound of people waking up warms my heart. But I'd much prefer the sound of people apologizing, or expressing remorse. In June 2022, the unjabbed weren't allowed on planes. Nor even in airport terminals. They were trapped. Ah, but only for these select airports you'll say... https://t.co/tFI0V8phyk
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
@LionAdvocacy The moron dug his own hole. Denied that it was happening. Then acknowledged it was happening in “private enterprises” - that were *federally* regulated! Then took pride in the fact that it was happening. @DominicCardy has been awful quiet as of today. 😆 https://t.co/jwPKH4vpVz
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe a video where Ezra Levatn asks the Canadian government why they won’t accept RFK Jr.’s offer to take the ostriches; he wonders about an alliance with the Trump administration during trade talks. They answer in French, “next question,” then Ezra says they spit on the Trump administration. They aren’t Trump’s friends, want to kill animals and tyrannize Canadians, and are evil.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
This video needs to be seen by @realDonaldTrump and @RobertKennedyJr. In this video, @ezralevant - who is exponentially more polite with these sacks of human waste - asks the Canadian government why they would not accept RFK Jr.’s offer to take the ostriches. Ezra asks why it would not be a good thing to establish an alliance/relationship with the Trump administration during these trade talks. In smug fashion, the government, in French, says “next question”, not just ignoring Ezra and his legitimate question. But spitting on the Trump administration. Watch this video, President Trump. The Canadian government is not your friend. And does not want to be your friend. They want to kill animals and tyrannize Canadians. They are truly evil.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see food moved out of reach for the ostriches, then RCMP arrest the man who pushes it so they can eat. A week later CFIA starves an ostrich, protected by armed RCMP. They arrest the one trying to stop another death in CFIA custody. Every RCMP member should be disgusted. Royal Canadian Mounted Gestapo
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
So they put the food out of reach of the ostriches, then @rcmpgrcpolice arrests the guy who pushes the food so the ostriches can actually eat it. A week after the @InspectionCan starve an ostrich to death. Protected by the armed goons of the RCMP. Who arrest the individual merely attempting to make sure yet another Ostrich doesn’t die under the custody of the CFIA. Every member of the RCMG should be disgusted with themselves. And yes, that is their new name: Royal Canadian Mounted Gestapo.
@DreaHumphrey - Drea Humphrey
BREAKING OSTRICH FARM NEWS: Here is why Jim Kerr was arrested at the farm today. I’m told the CFIA has responded by restricting the birds from coming to this corner of the pen where supporters normally view them. More to come at http://SaveTheOstriches.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jim Kerr was arrested, and he videoed himself going across the line that is the quarantine zone—the blue punishment fence, which is referred to as the Blue Mile and described as a theatrical display of punishment for standing up for what’s right. The speaker delivers a message to everyone visiting the farm to respect the blue fence and the boundary, because that boundary is their communication line and their line into the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in protecting their animals. The speaker clarifies that they’re not saying to break the line, but sometimes they have to bend it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So as everybody heard, Jim Kerr did get arrested, and he videoed himself going across the line that is the quarantine zone, the blue punishment fence, I call it it's called Blue Mile, the punishment fence, because it all is just a theatrical display of punishment is what it is for standing up for what's right. But we just really a message out to everybody, please, to encourage anybody who's visiting the farm to respect that blue fence and respect that boundary because that boundary is our communication line and our line into the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in protecting our animals. I'm not saying we have to break the line, but sometimes we gotta bend them.
Save the Ostriches!
rebelnews.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling CBC News’ Crown corporation and 22 Minutes the worst state-funded propaganda on the ostrich standoff. Here’s my analysis—watch and share. You should be ashamed; you’re not just propagandists, you’re doing evil deeds. Commie tube. Rumble!
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Welp, Canada's "Crown Corporation" @CBCNews via it's "comedy" arm of @22_Minutes has put out the most atrocious piece of state-funded propaganda you have EVER seen on the ostrich standoff. Here is my analysis. Watch and share. And "This Hour Has 22 Minutes", you should be ashamed of yourselves. You are not just shameless whores and propagandists, you are actually participating in evil deeds.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker rails against what they call state-funded propaganda from Canada, focusing on a CBC piece and a two-minute segment from This Hour Has Twenty Two Minutes about an ostrich crisis in Edgewood, British Columbia. They describe the CBC as a crown corporation funded by taxpayers and labeled it “state funded propaganda.” The core topic is a farm in Edgewood with about 400 ostriches that have been on the farm for over 35 years. After ostrich testing related to antibodies in eggs and yolk during COVID, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ordered the kill of all ostriches on the farm, including the healthy birds, citing an avian flu outbreak. The speaker explains that in December 2024 two ostriches were tested by the CFIA with anal swab PCR; the results allegedly indicated avian flu (H5N1) in those two carcasses. The farm challenged the CFIA decision in federal court, and by May the court found the CFIA’s decision not inherently unreasonable and allowed the kill order to stand. The farm appealed to the Court of Appeal in Ottawa, and by August the appellate court upheld that the birds should be killed, despite eight months of healthy birds on the farm. The farm then pursued a Supreme Court of Canada route, with an interim protective order preventing slaughter while the Supreme Court considers whether to hear the case; if they do not hear it, the protective order lapses and the CFIA may proceed with slaughter. A standoff has persisted for about a month, with the CFIA constructing kill pens and the RCMP providing armored protection to the CFIA. The farm asserts that about 100 ostriches are missing and that one ostrich died under CFIA custody from dehydration and neglect, named Spirit. The speaker claims the CFIA did not administer electrolytes and that the ostrich died, alleging mistreatment by CFIA personnel who refused to provide proper care.
The speaker notes that journalists, protestors, and the RCMP are present at the site, and that the CFIA has refused to provide a proper count of the remaining birds. They accuse the CFIA of misleadingly portraying the situation in BC as an ongoing outbreak and claim the birds have been healthy for nearly a year and have not been retested since December 2024, except for the two dead birds tested. They allege that the only testing occurred on dead carcasses and suggest potential false positives due to testing methods. They criticize the segment for omitting key timeline details about the outbreak and for implying the birds are sick, which the speaker contends is false. The speaker mentions external figures like Robert Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Oz showing interest in the birds, and notes blows against Florida as part of the propaganda framing.
Throughout, the speaker asserts that the birds are healthy, the CFIA is withholding retesting, and the CBC piece is an example of manufacturing consent and disinformation. They urge viewers to unsubscribe or resist the show, claim the segment is insidious, and argue that the real issue is government control and alignment with global health agreements rather than animal illness. The confrontation concludes with a call to share the video and to recognize the broadcast as propaganda, while ending with personal promotional remarks about health, sunlight, and Florida.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen of the interwebs, we have reached levels of state funded propaganda coming out of Canada that would make North Korea green with envy. Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator, current Florida rumbler in my home office with the beautiful Florida sun about ready to set, and I don't often get worked up for no reason. I'm joking. I often get worked up, but it's for darn good reason. I saw a video on the Internet today.
It actually made me red with rage. Is that even a thing? It enraged me so much. I sat there watching what was supposed to be two minutes of comedy, and I was sitting there not laughing. Not only not laughing, stewing with anger at not just the levels of stupidity, but the state funded propaganda going on behind this clip.
If you don't know what this hour has twenty two minutes is, let me read you what is this hour has twenty two minutes coming out
Speaker 1: of Canada. Spoiler alert, it's a shitty version of Saturday Night Live.
Speaker 0: A shitty, totally unfunny Canadian version state funded propaganda of Saturday Night Live. And when I say it's unfunny compared to Saturday Night Live, that tells you how unfunny this hour has twenty two minutes is. This hour has twenty two minutes is a Canadian satirical news comedy television show that uses sketches and commentary to parody current events. Created by Mary Walsh, the show features Toronto based anchors and roving correspondents who provide a humorous take on headlines and news. From Wikipedia, this hour has twenty two minutes commonly shortened to twenty two minutes since 2009 is a weekly Canadian television comedy that airs on CBC television.
Launched in 1993 during Canada's thirty fifth general election, the show focuses on Canadian politics with a combination of news parody, sketch comedy, and satirical editorials. Originally featuring Kathy Jones, Rick Mercer, Greg Thorney, and Mary Walsh, the series featured satirical sketches of the weekly news and Canadian political events. The show's format is a mock news program news program intercut with comic sketches, parody commercials, and humorous interviews of public figures. Now the takeaway from this description is not the fact that it's not actually a comedy despite being passed off as comedy. It's that it's on the CBC network, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation network.
The CBC is a crown corporation that gets its funding annually $1,600,000,000 in funding from taxpayer dollars, so it is state funded propaganda. And they just put out a piece I don't know if it was today, yesterday. They just put out a piece dealing with the ostrich standoff in Edgewood, British Columbia. You know the thing that I've been going crazy about for the last six months, give or take? They put out a piece, a two minute segment of comedy that is pure North Korean level propaganda.
Now for those of you who don't know what's going on with the ostriches, welcome to the channel because I've been going nuts about it hard for the last month without getting into too much unnecessary detail, the ostriches. There's a farm in Edgewood, British Columbia that had over 400 ostriches on the farm. The ostriches have been in the family for over thirty five years. Recently, since COVID, they had been doing tests on the ostriches, and they've been working with the Japanese scientists to find antibodies in the ostrich eggs and the yolk. Beforehand, it was open to the public, but then COVID hit, and it was no longer open to the public.
One thing that's for certain, none of these birds were ever for public consumption. So how the Canadian Food Inspection gets involved and orders a kill order of all of the ostriches on this farm, that's a little bit beyond me, although I could sort of understand how the CFIA gets involved. But bottom line, December 2024, the birds get sick and something like 60 some odd birds die. Two birds are tested by the CFIA, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. They do an anal swab PCR test of two carcasses, determined that in December 2024, those two carcasses suffered from h five n one avian flu, whatever the heck they're calling it.
And the CFIA comes in and says, gotta kill each and every ostrich on this farm, even the 400 that survived the outbreak. The farm contests this administrative decision of this Soviet body, CFIA. They take it to the federal court. By May, we are now five months out of the original testing. The federal court comes down and says, yeah.
The decision by the CFIA, it's an administrative body. They have their own expertise. It wasn't inherently unreasonable. And even though the birds have been healthy now for damn five months, yeah, you gotta go ahead and kill all of them as per the CFIA's call order. The farm appeals that decision, takes it up to the court of appeal in Ottawa and in August.
We are now December to January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August. Eight months out of the initial outbreak, eight months of healthy ostriches on that farm, the court of appeal comes in and says, yeah. You gotta go ahead and kill those birds even though they have been healthy now for eight months. The farm appeals to the supreme court of Canada, and there has been an interim protective order issued so that they can't kill the birds in the meantime until the supreme court decides whether or not they take up the decision. If they take it up, the protective order stays in effect until they render a final decision.
And if they don't take it up, that's where it ends. The protective order runs out and the CFIA can go in and kill those birds, but it hasn't prevented the CFIA from going in and trying to kill those birds. There has been a standoff on the farm for about a month now. The CFIA goes in with its intention to kill the birds. They are protected by what I'm referring to as the armed Gestapo agents, the RCMP, who have been doing nothing short of supervising animal abuse.
I'll get to it in a second.
Speaker 2: What a picture that is.
Speaker 0: The RCMP is in there. There has been a standoff going on for a month now. The CFIA has been setting up what they call kill pens. They've been stacking bales of hay, something like four bales high, two bales wide, and they're building an enclosure, which I presume they're going to run all of the remaining ostriches into to slaughter them if and
Speaker 1: when they ever get the go ahead to
Speaker 0: do it. But in the meantime, something like a 100 ostriches are missing and one ostrich has died under the custody of the CFIA from absolute neglect and torture. That ostrich's name was Spirit. It was suffering from dehydration. It was not being treated properly by the CFIA, who apparently don't know how to deal with ostriches.
Not surprising. I mean, how many people know how to deal with ostriches other than, you know, the farm that's been dealing with the ostriches for thirty five years. This ostrich wasn't doing well. It was dehydrated and neglected. And they were told at the CFIA that this ostrich will die if you do not administer electrolytes to the ostrich.
The CFIA apparently didn't do it, and the ostrich did in fact die. Why is this relevant? It's gonna come up in the video that we're gonna analyze that came out of this hour has twenty two minutes.
Speaker 1: We just had a sorry? And you have Yeah. Three yeah. Talk to We just estimated based on our condition well, just previous year. Oh, you estimated what her temperature was?
Yeah. You didn't take We did not take it to her. We did not. So just looking at her, you can tell me that she's about 38 and a half degrees. Is that what you're saying?
Is she dehydrated? Yeah. She is dehydrated. What what's your solution for Well, I fixing the dehydration? We can we can talk about that.
But No. No. What what what's your solution for that? We're we're monitoring her water intake today. That's what we're doing.
And how how are you monitoring water intake? Looking at what she's drinking. And how many other birds have access to that water? Yesterday, we had them all out. This morning when we came in, they had broken through the state.
So We're trying to protect her because anybody else coming in. From coming in to have your body. Yeah. Okay. So there's birds in in here with her right now.
So how much water do you think she has drank, and how much water have the other birds drank? I'm not sure, dear. You're not sure. Okay. So I'm suggesting that she's not drinking.
Look in her beak. Yeah. She must be hydrated. I No. No.
Look in her beak. I did the smoke. And see that? Yeah. She's got a bunch of dirt in her freaking beak.
Making from There's no water. If she was drinking, it wouldn't look like that. So what's used to this? Yeah. She she definitely needs tubing.
Yeah. Probably that.
Speaker 0: So there has been this standoff now. We are going into the fourth week where the CFIA is there building up their kill pin. The RCMP is there providing armored protection to the CFIA. Journalists are there. Protesters are there, and we are supervising what's going on in as much as humanly possible.
Something like a 100 ostriches are unaccounted for, and we don't know where they are. The CFIA won't give a proper count of the ostriches, and the RCMP won't allow the farm owners to go in and do a proper count of their own animals. Set all that aside. I get sent a video today that Rebel News posted on Twitter of a two minute segment on this hour has 22 where they actually tackle the ostrich crisis, the ostrich standoff. And first things first, I say that if this finally made it to the attention of this hour has twenty two minutes and they felt the need to put out this two minute piece of utter rubbish propaganda.
We have already succeeded to some extent in the court of public opinion bringing attention to this matter to the point where it finally got to the eyes of the propagandists at the CBC, and this hour has twenty two minutes. But watch this clip. I'm going to pause it periodically and add my insights to highlight the insidious disinformation, misinformation, and state funded propaganda in this to manufacture consent, to misinform whatever idiots are still watching this dumbass show. I'm gonna pause it periodically, but my goodness. It is absolute insidious rubbish.
And with that long intro rant and a broader context, let us watch this two minutes of state funded propaganda that makes Kim Jong un think, holy crab apples, I need to take some lessons from the communist state of Canada.
Speaker 3: The supreme court has delayed a planned execution of nearly 400 ostriches in British Columbia after an avian flu outbreak.
Speaker 0: Pause it. Piece of propaganda number one, ambiguity on the timeline after an avian flu outbreak? Why don't you tell us, dear propagandist, dear bootlicker of government tyranny, when that outbreak was? If he had said that the outbreak was
Speaker 1: a year ago, any reasonable viewer would say, why do we need to kill these birds now? But, no,
Speaker 0: he doesn't offer that key piece of information. He lets you think that the avian flu outbreak in as much as there ever was one is contemporaneous, is recent, such that a reasonable viewer could say, yeah. I can understand why you need to kill sick birds. They have been healthy for
Speaker 1: a year. Omit that detail. You filthy piece of
Speaker 0: propaganda's rubbish. Serenity now and back to the video.
Speaker 3: For more, I'm joined by ostrich farmer, Elwood Coburn. Good evening.
Speaker 2: Oh, hello. That's alright, girl. It's okay. That's okay. That's okay.
Speaker 3: Oh, I'm I'm sorry. Is your alright?
Speaker 2: Oh, yeah, Bessie. She's alright. Just a bit scared because of all the media attention. That and a touch of bird flu.
Speaker 0: Pause it, you filthy propagandist jackasses. Yeah. That and a little bit of bird flu. The birds don't have the bird flu. In fact, they've been healthy for a year.
In fact, the farm has wanted to retest them. But in fact, the courts have actually prevented the farm from retesting the birds under penalty of massive fines or potential jail. They have not tested these birds since December 2024, and then the only two they tested were two dead corpses with anal swab PCR tests. From what I understand, cycled to 40. Many of you out there might know what that means in terms of potential false positives.
But this guy comes out here and suggests to the general public, the dumb viewers of this stupid show that the birds are infected with the avian flu, lies, lies, lies. State funded lies on state funded propaganda. This is why you need to defund the CBC. Serenity now back to the video.
Speaker 2: Are you okay? Oh, yeah. Oh, yes. We expected. Dude, that's a good one.
That's a good one. That's a good one.
Speaker 3: I think that ostrich is sick.
Speaker 2: Bessie? No. She's not sick. She's just an asshole.
Speaker 0: Pause it. I think that ostrich is sick. How the hell does he think that bird is sick? First of the bird is not sick. They haven't been sick in a year, but they're letting everybody think.
They're casting that seed of doubt into their idiot base audience that the birds are sick and therefore need to be killed. It gets even worse if you can imagine it.
Speaker 3: The Canadian Food Inspection Agency says the ostriches need to be destroyed. They alleged that you haven't been taking good care of the birds.
Speaker 0: Pause it. I'm relatively familiar with the lawsuit in its entirety. I've been following it for about six months right now. Nowhere have they alleged that they were not treating the birds properly. What they've alleged is that the farm is not following through on the CFIA instructions to kill and the quarantine measures, potentially.
That's what they're alleging. Nowhere have they alleged that the farm owners have been mistreating or not properly caring for these birds. It's just an outright lie. Not only to depict these birds as being sick, which they are not, but to depict the farm owners as mistreating the animals. The only people mistreating and abusing these animals are the people at the CFIA as evidenced by the fact that Spirit died under their custody.
Let's get to that part right now.
Speaker 2: How dare they? What's this country coming to if a man can't keep to himself and raise 400 ostriches? I'm not gonna stand by with my head in the sand. The CFIA has these birds worried sick. Thanksgiving was just the other day and these ostriches were so upset they barely touched their turkey.
Speaker 3: Okay, but some famous American politicians have gotten involved. Robert Kennedy Junior has asked for the birds to be studied, not killed. Doctor Oz offered to rehome the birds on his Florida ranch.
Speaker 2: Florida? What do you think we are? Not as busy as bird flu, not mad cow disease.
Speaker 0: It's not funny. It's not only not funny, it's actually scary. There are gonna be people who are going to watch this and come away thinking, firmly believing that the birds have the avian flu, that the birds are sick. It's actually totally insidious. Just remember it.
I'll say it over and over again. The birds are healthy. They've been healthy for damn near a year right now, and the CFIA is preventing the farm from retesting them under penalty fines and jail. But the state funded propagandists have got their eye on this because it got a certain amount of attention because RFK junior and doctor Oz have showed an interest in saving those birds' lives, and so they've gotta deceive the general population who still watches that show that the birds are somehow sick, which they're not. And then they go and insult Florida as if Canadians don't travel to Florida, as if snowbirds from Quebec don't come down to Florida.
I hear more French here than I hear in Montreal sometimes. Birds. Demonize and lie about the farm owners, and then demonize Florida as if a ton of Canadians don't come down to Florida to drink that sweet, sweet Florida orange juice, to bask on the beaches, to enjoy the nightlife of Miami. These people are truly idiots. But beyond idiots, they are evil.
Speaker 3: K. But the court order says that since the outbreak began, some 70 ostriches have died. And didn't another ostrich died just last week?
Speaker 0: I'm actually at a loss for words to describe this evil. I mean, I can only say insidious and evil that many times before the words themselves start to lose a bit of their impact. Since the outbreak began, the outbreak has been over for damn near a year. And didn't one of them just die? Yes.
Because you just killed one of them. Tom McDonald in one of his songs has the great lyrics, they kill you, and then they broadcast it and make it the news. The CFIA literally killed that ostrich. They didn't just kill that ostrich. They tortured it before they finally killed it a week ago, and now they take that dead ostrich that they killed and they pass it off as the need to slaughter the rest of them.
It's actual evil. It's the banality of evil. They're just making it look like jokes on This Hour Has twenty two Minutes.
Speaker 2: Well, we still have three ninety nine healthy ostriches. That's three ninety eight birds who have nothing wrong with them. There's three ninety seven birds with a right to live and if the government has their way, there will be 396 birds left. They wanna kill all 395 birds. Well, I plan to save all 394 of them.
Bessie. Bessie girl, talk to me. Mouth to beak. Is she is she Bessie. Bessie.
Bessie.
Speaker 3: Good luck with the case.
Speaker 0: Hardy freaking hard. If you found that as unfunny and intellectually insulting as I did, take a minute right now to make sure that you are subscribed. Turn on notifications and share this video with someone who you think would like it, and share it with someone who you know would not like it because they probably need to see it the most. But my final thoughts on all of this, you just watched two minutes of government paid propaganda that misinforms, misleads, and manufacturers consent among the general population of people who are stupid enough to believe any of that.
Speaker 1: People are gonna believe that the outbreak is ongoing. The outbreak is not ongoing. People are gonna believe
Speaker 0: that an ostrich just died for reasons related to illness. An ostrich did not die for reasons related to illness. An ostrich died because the CFIA goons
Speaker 1: killed it. People are gonna think
Speaker 0: that the birds have somehow been tested recently because they've been led to believe the outbreak has been current. In fact, the birds have not been tested since last year, and then only two of them were tested, and the farm owners have been forbidden from testing the birds under penalty of massive fines or jail. I wonder why they would not want the birds to be tested again. Might it be because the public would realize these birds are not sick? This has nothing to do with the virus.
This has to do with total government control and, oh, yes, satisfying the World Organization of Animal Health Agreements, also known as, woah, and how we have submitted national independence to globalist institutions. But please share this video around and go let the folks at this hour has twenty two minutes know that you do not appreciate the insulting disinformation that they are putting out there, the state funded propaganda. Go let the government know. Send emails. I don't know.
Voice your opposition to this abject insanity. But my goodness, at the very least, that it exists. Understand that they are manufacturing consent even in this day and age, and that some people who are still in this silo of government disinformation are in fact being swayed by it, and they don't even know it. So that's it. This hour has twenty two minutes.
You suck crap, and I hope you know it. If you like what I do, you know what to do. But most importantly, exercise, eat healthy sunlight. Go get some of that beautiful Florida sunlight. It's an amazing place.
Florida, it's a hell of a drug. Taylor Swift. You know what I'm talking about. Booyah.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
commie tube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvszJXOPxDo
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
reSee.it AI Summary
I just found out that the person who set off smoke bombs at the Sean Feucht gathering in Montreal has been identified. It turns out he works for the federal government in national defense and has connections to antifa. This might explain why authorities in Quebec and Canada couldn't locate him. The whole situation is shocking, and I urge everyone to watch the full report and share it. It's absolutely wild!
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
HOLY SHIAT! PLEASE RE-SHARE! Remember that guy who unleashed the smoke bombs in the church at the @seanfeucht religious gathering in Montreal? @ThevoiceAlexa from @RebelNewsOnline found the alleged perpetrator. And get this… He works for the federal government in national defense! And get this… He has strong ties to antifa! Which might explain why Quebec and Canadian authorities were “unable” to track him down… The full report is here. Please watch and share! This is absolutely wild. https://rumble.com/v6zo68u-we-found-him-the-alleged-smoke-bomber-and-his-shocking-links-to-antifa-insi.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found the thug who allegedly smoke bombed a Christian worship service and he appears to be linked to an antifossil operating within Canada's Department of National Defense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found the thug who allegedly smoke bombed a Christian worship service and he appears to be linked to an antifossil operating within Canada's Department of National Defense.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m shocked to learn that the RCMP is not only escorting Inspection Canada agents to farms for bird slaughter but also allowing them to cover their identifying plates. This feels like active participation in breaking the law. The justification for covering plates is alleged threats, but I doubt anyone supporting the birds would threaten anyone. It seems that any opposition is labeled a threat, even concerns voiced to the CFIA. The RCMP has crossed a line from merely following orders to becoming willing participants in this disturbing situation, reminiscent of their actions during the Ottawa protest.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Oh wow… The Gestapo @rcmpgrcpolice admit they are not only escorting the @InspectionCan agents to the farm to slaughter the birds, but allowing them to cover their identifying plates and numbers as they escort them. The Gestapo is no longer just following orders. They are active participants in breaking the law to facilitate the slaughter. And why are the trucks covering their plates? Because they allegedly received “threats”. As if anyone supporting the birds would threaten anyone. I bet the coward bastards at the CFIA consider people calling up to voice concern and opposition “a threat”. I bet they cry that the people calling them the real animals is “a threat”. I guarantee they consider any pushback they get to be “a threat”. I bet the President Paul MacKinnon @CFIAPresACIA considers it a “threat” every time I tag him in a tweet. They cry out in pain as they strike you. The RCMP have crossed the threshold of just “following orders”. They are now gleeful participants. Much like they were when they beat the ever-loving piss out of veterans at Ottawa’s trucker protest. A disgusting scourge is what they are. State-sanctioned terrorism.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to reiterate a few key points: this situation is state-sanctioned terrorism. The farm owners, who have cared for the birds for months, should be allowed to access them during this interim period. Instead, it feels like pure psychological abuse. The birds are being tortured, and if anything happens to them, the officials at Inspection Canada must be held accountable. I suspect the CFIA is intentionally stressing the birds to weaken their immune systems, potentially leading to claims of illness that justify culling. We need to raise awareness and hold the Conservative party accountable for their complicity in this cruelty.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
I’ll say a few things, some of which I’ve already said: 1) this is state-sanctioned terrorism. 2) there is zero reason for which the farm owners, who have been properly caring for the animals for the last 10 months (in addition to the last decades), should not be allowed to access and care for the birds during the interim stay. It is purely punitive. Purely psychological abuse. Hence, state-sanctioned terrorism. 3) they are torturing the birds, and if anything happens to the birds under the custody of the @InspectionCan, each and every principle for that Soviet organization should be held accountable. From its president Paul MacKinnnon, to every other member. @CFIAPresACIA Of course, they probably have government immunity. And considering they only want (and got) custody of the birds so they can slaughter them, they won’t give a sweet buggerall if the birds are tortured to death under their custody. Heck, they might even get some pleasure out of seeing it happen, as some sort of payback given the defiance of the farm and its owners to submit to the tyranny of the CFIA. 4) I would not be surprised if the CFIA is deliberately stressing the birds so that their immune system gets weakened, and that they are more susceptible to any form of infection. That way they can claim - after having tortured the birds into a weakened state - that they got sick again and need to be culled. 5) I would not put it past the CFIA to DELIBERATELY INFECT the birds with some form of avian influenza. If the birds were to get sick, it should be PRESUMED that the CFIA infected them. We should all be channeling our @GadSaad inner “honey badger”, and tagging everyone and anyone who can make an impact. And we should be shaming and shunning the so-called “Conservative” party of Canada for being complicit in the tyranny and animal torture. @CPC_HQ @PierrePoilievre
reSee.it AI Summary
I've shared more footage from Universal Ostrich Farm, highlighting the mistreatment of these injured birds by the CFIA and the RCMP. The birds are not sick; they are being tortured, with inadequate care and improper handling. The CFIA seems ill-equipped to manage the situation, and their silence, along with that of their President, is troubling. It feels like if this were an apple orchard, there would be more outrage. The current state of affairs reflects a troubling reality in our government, where evil persists under the guise of following orders.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
More footage from Universal Ostrich Farm. These birds are not ill. They are injured and being tortured by the goons at the @InspectionCan with their armed Gestapo agents at the @rcmpgrcpolice The birds are under the custody of the CFIA (why hasn't its President Paul MacKinnon @CFIAPresACIA said anything?). The CFIA obviously doesn't know how to deal with ostriches. Nor do they care. @RCMP flying drones too low and scaring the birds into injury. CFIA not feeding them or hydrating them properly. They are being tortured. Maybe if it was an apple orchard @PierrePoilievre would say something. Weak men create hard times. And evil is alive and well in the Canadian government. Just following orders. @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: 'Another bird.' 'Wanna see?' 'Hang on.' 'Looks like this is drones.' 'This is police.' 'Okay.' '+1 23.' 'Here we go.' 'Okay.' 'You're okay.' 'You're okay.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another bird. Wanna see? Hang on. Looks like this is drones. This is police.
Okay. +1 23. Here we go. Okay. You're okay.
You're okay.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
I am told that two apparent police helicopters flew over Universal Ostrich Farm last night, shining a spotlight on the property for reasons unknown, but apparent Here is the video. I am putting out a vlawg on the updates today. Situation is critical. Please tag and share. https://t.co/wKhuvK5rll
reSee.it AI Summary
I won't make this inflammatory or accusatory. I’m sharing a Tucker Carlson report from October 14, 2020, tweeted by Donald Trump Jr. I wonder if this nearly 10-minute exposé contradicts everything Laura Loomer said in her detailed tweet thread about Tucker Carlson.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
I’m not going to turn this into an inflammatory tweet, or make any incendiary accusations. This is a Tucker Carlson report from October 14, 2020. Tweeted by @DonaldJTrumpJr himself. @LauraLoomer Does this near 10-minute exposé not undermine/contradict everything you said in this elaborate tweet thread about @TuckerCarlson?
Video Transcript AI Summary
A major American newspaper published a story about a presidential candidate, but tech monopolies censored it, preventing the public from reading it. The story involves emails detailing Hunter Biden's relationship with Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company, and how his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, intervened to help his son.
The emails came from a laptop left at a Delaware repair shop. The shop owner gave the laptop to the FBI and a copy of the hard drive to Rudy Giuliani's office. Facebook announced it would censor the story, and Twitter locked The New York Post's account and prevented users from sharing the story, claiming it was potentially harmful.
Hunter Biden referred to his father as "my guy" while trying to extract more money from Burisma. An executive at Burisma said they needed Hunter Biden's influence to stop politically motivated actions. Another email revealed that the executive met with Joe Biden in DC at Hunter's invitation. Joe Biden previously denied knowing what his son was doing at Burisma. In 2018, Joe Biden said he got a Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma fired. A photo also surfaced of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a Burisma board member.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never imagined it could happen in this country, and yet today it did happen. A major American newspaper published a story, apparently an entirely accurate story, about a presidential candidate. The tech monopolies that control American media feared this story might hurt that candidate whom they favor. So three weeks before a national election, they shut the whole thing down. They prevented the public from reading the news.
They didn't apologize for doing this. They didn't bother to make up reasonable sounding justifications for it. They just did it exactly as the Chinese government does. These are monopolies. They have all the power.
You have none. They don't have to care what you think, and they don't. This was mass censorship on a scale that America has never experienced, not in two hundred and forty five years, and it's a threat to all of us. Democracies only function when there is a free exchange of information between citizens. We no longer have that.
This is a dark moment. Here are the details. This morning, the New York Post published a series of emails that describe Hunter Biden's lucrative relationship with a Ukrainian energy company called Burisma and then describe how his father, then the vice president of The United States, intervened to help his son pedal influence. Now we've known the outlines of this story for quite some time, but these emails add damning detail. No one appears to dispute that they're real, not even the Joe Biden campaign.
You're hearing whispers tonight. It's all part of a Russian disinformation campaign. If this is a hoax, it is the most complex, sophisticated hoax ever perpetrated. It doesn't seem possible. There are too many.
There's too much detail. These emails came from a laptop, an Apple laptop that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop last year and then abandoned there. After a certain number of days with no payment, the shop's owner took legal possession of the lap laptop. He looked inside. There were tens of thousands of emails, including exchanges with representatives of foreign companies and foreign governments.
The laptop apparently belonged to Hunter Biden. The shop owner was stunned by this by the appearance of corruption, and he was afraid for his family. So late last year, he gave the laptop to the FBI. He kept a copy of the hard drive for himself, but he never heard back from the FBI. By May, he was anxious, so he made overtures to senator Mike Lee's office and at least one conservative nonprofit.
He emailed their websites, but no one responded. Finally, the man contacted Rudy Giuliani's office, and today's story is the result of that. Well, the tech monopolies instantly crushed it the moment it appeared. An executive at Facebook called Andy Stone, a former Democratic staffer, announced that his company would censor The New York Post story. As he put it, Facebook would be, quote, reducing its distribution on our platform.
Twitter quickly followed suit by locking The New York Post's entire Twitter account, one of the biggest newspapers in the world banned from Twitter. Twitter then prevented its users from sharing The New York Post story, both privately and publicly. Those who tried to share it got this message, quote, your tweet couldn't be sent because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful. Harmful? In a separate explanation, Twitter wrote this, quote, We don't permit the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking that contains private information may put people in physical harm or danger or contains trade secrets.
Yes. The same Twitter that just promoted a New York Times story about the president's private tax returns, obviously obtained illegally. That Twitter. And who, by the way, was hacked here? No one was hacked.
Twitter never addressed that. As for, quote, trade secrets, there were none. We already knew that Hunter Biden was trading on his father's office to make $50 a month from the Ukrainians. In October, he admitted it.
Speaker 1: You didn't have any extensive knowledge about natural gas or Ukraine itself, though?
Speaker 2: No. But I think that I had as much knowledge as anybody else that was on the board, if not more.
Speaker 1: In the list that you gave me of the reasons why you're on that board, you did not list the fact that you were the son of the president. Yeah. No. What role do you think that played?
Speaker 2: I think that it is impossible for me to be on any of the boards that I just mentioned without saying that I'm the son of the vice president of The United States.
Speaker 0: Oh, thanks for acknowledging reality. So we knew the outlines. What we didn't know until today was how brazen this was. Hunter Biden didn't simply sell access to his father, the vice president, or take cash to influence American foreign policy. No.
It's weirder than that. As he schemed to extract more money from Burisma, Hunter Biden didn't refer to his father as his father. He referred to Joe Biden, the vice president, as, quote, my guy. On 04/13/2014, for example, Hunter Biden wrote this to his business partner, quote, the announcement of my guys upcoming travel should be characterized as part of our advice and thinking, end quote. Hunter Biden added that he needed to be, quote, protected financially and wanted a long term role with Barisma.
Quote, the contract should begin now, not after the upcoming visit of my guy. That should include a retainer in the range of $25,000. It's not clear if Biden got that retainer, but we know he did get a high paying job of Burisma. Then in May 2014, just weeks after Hunter Biden joined the board of that company, a top executive there let him know why he was being paid very explicitly, quote, we urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message signal, etcetera, to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions. The executive wrote that in an email, quote, use your influence to convey a message.
What message? What does that mean? Well, another email from the same executive obtained by the New York Post dated April 1735 explains in very clear terms what it means. Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spend some time together. It's really an honor and pleasure.
Oh, that's what you're not allowed to read. And you can see why Facebook and Twitter don't want to allow you to read it. If Joe Biden met with Barisma executives at the request of his son for the profit of his own family, it becomes very clear that Joe Biden's previous denials were lies. Just last year, Joe Biden was telling us he had no idea what his son was doing at Barisma.
Speaker 3: You were the vice president running point on Ukraine. The average Joe hears that and says that sounds fishy. What's your understanding of what your son was doing for an extraordinary amount
Speaker 4: of money? I don't know what he was doing. I know he was on the board. I found out he was on the board after he was on the board, and that was it. And there's nobody
Speaker 2: Well, you have a lot
Speaker 3: of time. Isn't this something you wanna get to the bottom of?
Speaker 4: No. Because I trust my son.
Speaker 3: But that doesn't pass the smell test. Like, when you're vice president, isn't there a higher standard? Don't you need to know No. What's happening with your family? Don't you need to put down some guardrails?
Speaker 4: Unless there was something that was there was something on its face that was wrong. There's nothing on its face that was wrong.
Speaker 0: Nothing on its face that was wrong. That was before we saw these emails. You'll remember that back in 02/2018, Joe Biden explained that he got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired. That prosecutor, Victor Shokin, said he was planning to investigate Burisma when he was stripped of his job. Here's how Joe Biden explained slash bragged about how he can to Viktor Shokin.
Speaker 4: I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yat sen Yuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't. So they said they had they're walking out press conference and I'm I not gonna we're not gonna give you the billion dollars. They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said I said, call him.
I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a billion. I'm gonna be leaving here. And I think it was, what, six hours. I look at it.
Said, I'm leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch. You got fired.
Speaker 0: Why is the vice president of The United States firing prosecutors in Ukraine? Pause for a moment and ask yourself that. That's bizarre behavior. It doesn't help The United States in any way. Why was he doing that?
At the time, Biden's handlers denied there was anything wrong with this. They just said Shokin was corrupt and somehow the world was benefiting by Shokin getting fired. It didn't explain how we benefit from that. But, of course, Joe Biden didn't do it for his son. He didn't know anything about Burisma.
He didn't know what Hunter Biden was up to. No clue. Then last October, we showed you a photograph of Joe and Hunter Biden golfing with a board member of Burisma, Hunter Biden's business partner, a man called Devin Archer. The Biden campaign never explained that photograph. Our media, of course, never really followed up.
Instead, just as they're now rushing to bury the New York Post story, CNN rushed into Joe Biden's defense. The impeachment inquiry is centered on president Trump's attempts to get political dirt from Ukraine on vice president Biden and his son Hunter. Mister vice president, president Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine. I wanna point out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you. A few months later, we got some sense why Anderson Cooper was so careful in the interview you just saw.
In December, a voter in Iowa tried to ask Joe Biden about barisma and his fitness for office. Joe Biden lost control of himself. He called the man fat and then challenged him to a push up contest.
Speaker 4: You're not damn liar, man. That's not true. And no one has ever said that. And you wanna check my shape on? Let's do push ups together, man.
Let's do let's run. Let's do whatever you wanna do. Let's take down the pieces. You said I set up my son to work in an oil company. Ain't that what you said?
Get your words straight, Jack. Look, look. Here's the deal.
Speaker 0: Here's the deal. What is the deal, actually? That's a question every American, no matter what your political views, has a right to an answer.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a video where a speaker explains that interrupting a religious ceremony is a criminal offense in Canada, and police doing so are breaking the law. They emphasize the importance of documenting this. I also expressed my frustration, calling Canada a communist hellhole.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
For those who don’t speak French, the guy talking is saying how there’s a provision of the criminal code that makes it a criminal offense to interrupt any religious ceremony, and that any police officer interrupting a religious ceremony is breaking the law, and that they are making sure to have it on camera. Canada has become a communist hellhole.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Propaganda versus reality. It’s astonishing. It’s also now obvious why @MarkJCarney had to add music over the original audio. https://t.co/AUtaKyytnO
reSee.it AI Summary
In response to Robert Kennedy Jr.'s plea to the CFIA regarding the slaughter of nearly 400 healthy ostriches, the agency has dismissed his concerns. I believe the CFIA is misleading the public about the birds' health, as no ostrich has tested positive for H5N1 in over five months. The local disposal sites require proof of infection, which the CFIA cannot provide. People are gathering to protect the birds, and I’ve suggested installing live cameras to document any government actions. One ostrich has already been found shot, raising concerns about potential drone involvement. I will seek answers from the government and provide updates.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
In response to the letter from @RobertKennedyJr to the Canada Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) pleading with the CFIA not to slaughter the near 400 healthy ostriches on Universal Ostrich Farm, and that the States would accept the ostriches for further research, @InspectionCan and @CFIAPresACIA (whose X accounts are STILL PROTECTED despite being official government accounts) have basically flipped RFK Jr. the proverbial bird (pun intended). The CFIA continues to dishonestly assert / imply that the birds are infected with the H5N1 virus or are a risk. As far as I understand, this is a lie. No bird has tested positive in over 5 months, and none are currently infected. In fact, this is exactly why the local disposal sites stated they would only accept ostrich corpses for disposal if the CFIA provides proof of positive tests for H5N1 (which they haven't provided, because they can't provide them, because the birds are not infected). The CFIA seems hell bent on slaughtering these beautiful healthy animals on the pretext of a lie of infection / risk. It is inexcusable. It is inhumane. It is atrocious. Be peaceful and law-biding. Raise awareness. People have gathered on the property to protect the birds. I have suggested they install constant live stream cameras. If the government wants to come in and slaughter 397 beautiful beasts, make sure the world sees. So far, one ostrich has already been found shot after drones were spotted flying over the property. We do not know if the two incidents are relates. We do not know if the government dared administer lethal force via drone. I will ask the government in this post, and via media request. Share away. Will get details and updates if I have any.
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed a significant moment in presidential history when Donald Trump questioned what it would take for him to believe there is no white genocide in South Africa. Cyril Ramaphosa provided an absurd response, and Trump showcased a five-minute video of South African leaders calling for violence against white farmers. I noted Ramaphosa's smile fade into a grimace during the exchange. I predict the mainstream media will fact-check Trump regarding the memorial at the video's end, claiming it honors all farmers, while ignoring that over 87% of those killed are white.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
This is undoubtedly one of the single greatest moments in presidential history. Donald Trump asked what it will take for him to believe there is no white genocide going on in South Africa. President Cyril Ramaphosa offers a preposterous answer. Donald Trump then plays five minutes of South African political leaders calling to kill white South African farmers. Watch Cyril Ramaphosa’s stupid smile, ultimately fade into a grimace. Although I make a prediction: MSM is going to fact check Trump on the crosses memorial at the end of the video. They are going to say it is a memorial for ALL farmers killed, not just white farmers. They will not tell you that over 87% of all farmers killed have been white.
reSee.it AI Summary
I waited 4 minutes and 30 seconds for an answer to “where did you keep the papers?” He had notes, and I want to see them. I’m curious about who prepared those notes and would like to hear the rest of the Biden audio. This feels like an Abe Simpson story, but without the humor.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
4 min 30 seconds, and still no an answer to the question “where did you keep the papers?” Plus he had notes. I would like to see those notes. I would like to know who prepared those notes. I would also like to hear the rest of the Biden audio. Holy cow, this is like an Abe Simpson story, except without humor.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 recalls living on Chambers Road around 2017-2018, a period when his son was either deployed or dying. He was still considering a presidential run after leaving the Senate, despite encouragement from many except the president.
His son Bo died in May 2015, and Trump was elected in 2016 and sworn in January 2017. The book "Promise Me, Dad" originated after Bo's death, as they were very close. Speaker 1 describes Bo as his right arm. He used to commute home by train while still in the Senate. He acknowledges his close relationship with Bo was well-known. He prefers to continue speaking rather than take a break.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This time we were living in Chambers Road and there were documents related to the Penn Biden Center or the Biden or the cancer brain shot or your book. Where did you keep papers that related to those things that you were actively working?
Speaker 1: Well, I I I I I I I don't know. This is what? Twenty seventeen, eighteen that period? Yes, sir. Remember in this timeframe, my son is either been deployed or is dying.
So it was and by the way, there were still a lot of people at the time when I got out of the senate that were encouraging me to run-in this period, except the president. I'm not and not a mean thing to say. I mean, he just thought that she had a better shot of winning the president than I did. And so I hadn't I hadn't at this point, even though I'm at Penn, I hadn't walked away from the idea that I might run for office again. You know, if I ran again, I'd be running for president.
And and so what was happening though one month ago died, god, May 30 thirtieth. '20 '18. '20 '15, he died. Was May 2015. I think it's 2015.
Or you I'm not sure the months are, but I think that was Yeah. That's right, mister president. And what's happened in the meantime is that as Schump gets elected '16. '20 '16. Alright.
So why did I have 2017 here? That's when
Speaker 0: you left office January of twenty seventeen. Okay.
Speaker 1: But that's when Trump gets sworn in January. Right. Correct. Okay. Yeah.
Correct. And in 2017, Bo had passed and this is personal. The genesis of the book and the title Promise Me Dad was a, I know you're all close with your sons and daughters, but Bo was like my right arm and that was my left. These guys were a year and a day apart and they could finish each other's sentences. So I used to go home on a train in the period that I was still in the senate.
Anyway, There was pressure not pressure. Bo knew how much I adored him. And I don't know sounds maybe this sounds so everybody knew how close you were. There was not anybody in the world who wondered whether or not anyway.
Speaker 0: So Sir, I'm I'm wondering if it's a good time to take a break
Speaker 1: briefly then. No. I let me just keep going to get it done. I haven't washed my rug in over
Speaker 0: six
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Canadian Government Can Kill Your Children With IMPUNITY! Sean Hartman Lawsuit Versus Canada TOSSED! https://t.co/78ZbFDcvy4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dan Hartman's lawsuit against the Canadian government was dismissed; the court ruled the government owes no duty of care to its citizens regarding public health decisions, even if those decisions involve coercing citizens into medical procedures. This stems from the death of Hartman's 17-year-old son, Sean, who died 33 days after receiving a Pfizer COVID jab. Sean was hospitalized shortly after the jab, but a doctor allegedly failed to perform necessary tests (d-dimer and troponin) and sent him home. Hartman's attempts to sue the doctor were also dismissed, and his claim to the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) was denied due to insufficient evidence, though it is under appeal. The lawsuit alleged the government made false claims about vaccine safety and efficacy and failed to properly warn the public about potential adverse effects. The judge stated the government's representations were core policy decisions made during a pandemic to protect the public. The lawsuit against Pfizer is ongoing. Concerns are raised about airborne vaccines and the government's lack of leverage in negotiating vaccine contracts due to the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to Canada people where the government has the power to coerce you to submit to medical procedures but does not have the duty of care to make sure that those medical procedures won't kill you. Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler, not in Florida and not in my car because I am in DC, the heart of the beast, people. Because as of the time of shooting this vlog, tomorrow I will be meeting with members of the cabinet of the Trump administration as part of a media row where I'm gonna get to ask them questions. And if I get to ask RFK junior a question, it's gonna have a little something to do with the subject of this vlog. For those of you who have been around the channel for long enough, are familiar with the story of Dan Hartman, the father of the late Sean Hartman, a 17 year old boy who died thirty three days after taking the Pfizer jab.
I've had him on the channel many times. He's explained his entire story. He was suing both Pfizer and the Canadian government. The Canadian government for malfeasance among other charges. And today, he had his lawsuit against the government of Canada struck because the government of Canada owes no duty of care to its citizens.
But if you're new to the channel and you don't know Dan Hartman's story, it's an absolutely tragic story of heartbreak. For those of you who might need a refresher, his son, Sean Hartman, died thirty three days after taking the first COVID jab. He was 17 years young.
Speaker 1: He was the reason I woke up every morning. He was the reason I went to work. I've been a truck driver for eighteen years, and I used to love my job, and now I hate going. I I don't even care anymore. Sean was so special.
It's it's so hard to describe. He he wasn't like other kids. He was a shy boy, but such a good heart. He wouldn't have hurt anybody. He was my only son, and he was my reason, my
Speaker 0: love,
Speaker 1: and now he's gone. I believe they took him from me. I believe my son was murdered.
Speaker 0: But it's not just the case that Sean Hartman died suddenly in his sleep thirty three days after taking the first Pfizer COVID jab. He was actually hospitalized shortly after having taken the COVID jab. He went to see a doctor. He had brown rings under his eyes. He was vomiting, had skin rashes.
The doctor failed to do a d dimer test and a troponin test instead gave the kid aspirin, sent him home, and thirty three days later, he was dead. For those of you who may not know the purpose of the d dimer or troponin test, just a brief AI overview. Troponin levels in a blood test measure the amount of the protein troponin, specifically troponin I c t n l or troponin t c t n t released from damaged heart muscle indicating potential heart damage or a heart attack. As for d dimer, a d dimer test measures the levels of a protein fragment d dimer in the blood which is released when a blood clot breaks down helping to assess for blood clotting disorders and monitor treatment effectiveness. Why do I mention these two failed tests in particular?
Well, it seems that the doctor who treated Sean Hartman when he was hospitalized shortly after the jab failed or neglected to do both of these tests. Both of these tests are useful in determining heart damage that results from a COVID jab even though the doctor knew that Sean Hartman had recently had the COVID jab and Dan Hartman actually filed a complaint or tried to take that doctor to court. And Dan Hartman's case against that doctor was dismissed, so Dan couldn't go after the doctor who failed to adequately treat his kid. After the death of Sean, Dan also filed a claim with the VISP, the vaccine injury support program in Canada. His claim was dismissed, I think, within a month because they said he failed to provide adequate evidence that his son died as a result of the jab.
That is currently under appeal given the fact that they got new evidence indicating that there were high levels of spike protein in the adrenal glands of Sean Hartman, but that claim was dismissed, so he can't even get compensated under the vizp. So Dan Hartman files a claim against both Pfizer and the government of Canada. And by the way, he's not the only Canadian doing this. Kayla Pollock is also suing Moderna and the government of Canada for similar reasons. I expect her case, at least against the government of Canada, to get tossed for similar reasons.
But Dan Hartman decides to file a claim against Pfizer and the government of Canada. And today, a judge dismissed the claim against the government of Canada saying it has no reasonable chances of success and that the government of Canada owes no duty of care to its private citizens. People, one thing is for certain, the globalists will never stop. Now they are pushing airborne vaccines. No needles, no permission, just exposure.
The last administration quietly funded grants for aerosol vaccines, a delivery system that could infect us without consent. Just watch this.
Speaker 2: So we started pulling grants, and we could see that there was funding going to aerosolized COVID vaccines. But that wasn't the most shocking discovery that we made. This is what led us to the discovery that our government's funding research on transmissible vaccines or self spreading vaccines. They're developing vaccines that would essentially act like a live virus where it could basically replicate itself into new hosts.
Speaker 0: Millions were forced into the mRNA SIOP and cases of myocarditis, blood clots, and immune damage have skyrocketed. Eight states are in the process of banning these shots. The Trump administration needs to make sure that this tyranny hasn't been released on the general public. Doctor Pina McCullough and the wellness company created the ultimate spike detox with four times the naticonase plus bromelain curcumin to help break down spike proteins and support your body's natural recovery. Experience the only formula approved and used by the doctor Peter McCullough, a top cardiologist who risked it all to fight for us.
Head over to twc.health/viva. Use my promo code for the discount. You will get a great discount plus free shipping. Again, that is twc.health/viva. And now back to the vlog.
So Dan Hartman cannot sue the doctor. He can't get compensation under the vizp, and now a court says he can't get compensation from the government. And here's how it's being reported in the news today, and I've got confirmation from the lawyer as to the details of the dismissal of this case. Wait until you hear this. From the Canadian independent at Can Independent, they also broke the Kayla Pollock story and went into detail for her case.
Lawsuit against the Canadian government over teens' sudden death following Pfizer COVID nineteen jab, I refuse to call it the v word, dismissed by Ontario judge. An Ontario judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by Dan Hartman against the attorney general of Canada, Health Canada, and former Canadian health minister, Patty Hadju, for malfeasance in public office, deceit, fraud, and negligence over the sudden 2021 death of his 17 year old son, Sean Hartman, who was found dead on the floor beside his bed just over a month after receiving a Pfizer BioNTech COVID nineteen jab. In a ruling from the Ontario Superior Court, justice s Antoniani struck down the case without leave to amend, finding that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The court determined that the government did not owe a private duty of care to Sean Hartman and that public health decisions, including vaccine approval and promotion, were core policy matters shielded from liability. Now just a small legalese here, struck down without leave to amend means that they don't even give the chance to the plaintiff to amend their allegations, to add allegations, to make them stronger.
They don't even give them the permission, the authorization, the freedom to do that. They strike down the case. Do not give them permission to amend. That case is tossed as relates to the government. This judge out of Canada just basically said the government can coerce you to submit yourself to medical procedures while telling you that those medical procedures are safe and effective, but they owe you no duty of care to ensure that what they're telling you is truthful, accurate, and based in science.
Your kid dies and you have no claim against the government because the government has total immunity for what our policy decisions, they lied to you, they lied to your face, They told you things that they had no basis to tell you. In fact, they knew they were false or at the very least unproven when they told it to you, but they told it to you nonetheless. And too bad, so sad if you suffered any negative health consequences as a result. A government that can coerce you with immunity is not a democracy. It is an absolute egregious tyranny.
Later on from the post, Dan Hartman initially filed a claim with the Canadian government's vaccine injury support program, VISP, but it was denied within a month due to what the government called insufficient evidence. He has since appealed providing doctor Cole's pathology report, but has yet to receive a response. In his lawsuit against the government, Hartman alleged that Health Canada and the Minister of Health made false and misleading representations about the vaccine's safety and efficacy, failed to assess and monitor risks in accordance with their own mandate, and did not properly warn the public about potential adverse effects, including death. The claim argued that these actions created a relationship of proximity between the government and vaccine recipients giving rise to a duty of care. Quote, the representations made by the defendants here were the expressions of core policy decisions made in an effort to protect the general Canadian public during a pandemic, end quote, the judge ruled.
Remember when they told you it prevented transmission? It was a lie because they had never even tested it for transmission. Remember when they told you it was safe and effective? It was a lie because they didn't even have the data to come to that conclusion, but they get total immunity because it was in response to a public pandemic so they could do and say whatever they want with total immunity.
Speaker 3: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before, it's entered the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market.
Speaker 0: But the saving grace at the very least, Dan's lawsuit against Pfizer can continue for now. We'll see what happens with that. But this news is absolutely outrageous and it highlights the fact that the government is no longer a government. It is an absolute tyrannical force that can get away with literally what some people rightly believe to be murder. From what I understand, Hartman is going to appeal and that is not going to be free.
If you wanna support his cause, there's a give, send, go in the pinned comment, but that is the vlog. This is the absolute state of Canada. It is not in a good state and hopefully I'll be able to get RFK junior to address this, and maybe the American government can set a bit of a different tone and maybe come to the conclusion that Pfizer lied and people died. And when they told us they had good studies, they had good results, and we believed them, we believed a lie. And for that, people need to go to jail.
So that is the update. It's not what anybody wanted to see but it's what many expected. That is Canada in a nutshell. If you like what I do, you know what to do. Like, share, subscribe, turn on notifications, drop a comment in the comment section below.
Most importantly, share this story and if you can help Dan Hartman out, go help him out. Now you know you've a lot of people. Peace out. Booyah.
Speaker 4: These agreements require employees at the government of candidates that access these documents to sign confidentiality agreements. And why is that? Why is there much more redactions, as my colleague said, in these documents than in other documents? It's because these documents were signed at the beginning of a pandemic when everybody was desperate for vaccines, when companies were being told to rush vaccine production, do testing in an unprecedented way, in a way they normally don't do it. So these companies were exposed to way higher liability, putting their products on the market than they normally would because they didn't do the type of testing that normally takes these drugs years to come to market.
They did it all in less than a year. So that's why these companies said, if I'm gonna deliver you this product that I haven't tested in my normal way, I I wanna have different conditions. And with companies all countries around the world competing with each other to get these, the countries had less leverage than they normally do. For example, if we were entering into flu vaccine contracts or monkeypox contracts or other things that were normally available, this would be a different issue. But these are already signed.
They were signed at a time the government didn't have that leverage in negotiations. We just wanted to sign as many vaccine contracts with as many producers as possible cause Canadians were desperate for vaccines. And in the end, it worked out. We got vaccines, and we were one of the countries that got to vaccinate everybody the fastest.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
“Transnational Repression”. The government of Canada is now encouraging people to report “transnational repression”. Canada has become a Monty Python skit. And at the risk of engaging “transnational repression”: If you vote for the Liberals, you are an absolute buffoon! https://t.co/Lw5G1Lyh2i
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada aims to ensure all citizens can freely and safely participate in democratic processes. Internationally, Canada is working with partners to address transnational repression, and the G7 will discuss a coordinated response under Canada's 2025 presidency.
Domestically, Canada is taking a whole-of-society approach, with security and intelligence organizations at the forefront of detecting and countering threats.
Canadians are advised that their vote is secret and secure, and it is an offense to threaten someone to change their vote. They should record details of any such incidents and report them to local police or the RCMP National Security Information Network for non-immediate threats. The panel mentioned has a high threshold for intervention and does not monitor individual opinions, perspectives, or perceived public influence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The strength of Canadian society is for all of its citizens to be able to freely and safely participate in our democratic processes. Internationally, Canada is working with our partners and allies to address this pressing global threat. As part of Canada's Twenty Twenty Five presidency, g seven members will come together to discuss a coordinated response to countering transnational repression. Here at home, we are taking a whole of society approach. Canada's security and intelligence organizations are at the frontline of efforts to detect and counter this threat.
To all Canadians, if someone pressures you or threatens you to vote in a certain way, please remember two things. First, your vote is secret and secure. They will not be able to find out who you vote for. And second, it is an offence to threaten someone so that they change their vote. As soon as it is safe, write down details about the situation such as the person, location, and the event.
You can report incidents to local police in your area. You can also contact the RCMP National Security Information Network to report non immediate threats. As I mentioned last week, the panel has a high threshold for intervention. As well, the panel does not monitor individual opinions or perspectives or perceived or public influence.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights about Judge Boasberg, who oversaw the Kevin Clinesmith case. Clinesmith, an FBI lawyer, falsified evidence to secure illegal FISA warrants against Carter Page, impacting Donald Trump. Boasberg, as the presiding judge of the FISC, discussed his "random" assignment to the case and acknowledged a potential conflict of interest due to Clinesmith's actions. Despite this, both parties opted for him to remain, which I view as a lack of transparency and part of a cover-up, resulting in Clinesmith facing minimal consequences.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
This is Judge Boasberg who provided over the Kevin Clinesmith case. Clinesmith was the FBI lawyer who falsified evidence and submitted it to a secret FISA court to obtain unlawful spy, warrants against Carter page, to unlawfully spy on Donald Trump. Boasberg was the presiding judge of the foreign intelligence surveillance court (FISC). You only appreciate the corruption in hindsight. Here he is talking about how he was “randomly” assigned the case (if you believe that!). And how he might have a conflict because Clinesmith’s crime could be offensive to him as presiding judge of the FISC. He asks both parties that they want him to recuse himself, and they say no. You realize that this was not transparency. It was part of the cover-up that resulted in Clinesmith getting a mere slap on the wrist
Video Transcript AI Summary
The presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) addresses a criminal case involving statements related to a FISA application and its renewals. The judge clarifies that the case was randomly assigned and unrelated to their FISC role.
Acknowledging the FISC could be perceived as a victim of false statements in the case, the judge raised a potential recusal issue to avoid discomfort, particularly for the defense. Both sides were informed and given two days to consider a motion for recusal, which would be granted without argument.
Both the government and the defense declined the judge's offer to recuse. Neither side had questions regarding the judge's involvement or FISC role as it relates to the case. With both sides prepared, the court will proceed with the plea after swearing in Mr. Klein Smith.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Counsel made points. Think it's important to put these on the record. The first is, as many of you know, I am currently the presiding judge of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISC, FISC. This case involves all statements in relation to a FISA application and three renewals. The case, however, is a criminal case.
It is not a FISC case, and it is a case that was randomly assigned to me. In other words, like any criminal case, be it an indictment or an information, it's placed on our in the random wheel which spins and lands on a particular judge. And this one happened to land on me. But the fact that I am on the FISC or that I am its presiding judge had nothing whatsoever to do with the assignment of the criminal case to my criminal district court docket. The second is that I fully believe that my role on the FISC and as his presiding judge does not preclude my fairly presiding over this case.
Now, while I did not sign any of the four applications that are at issue here, I could see that the FISC itself could be perceived as a victim of false statements. And as I said, I am the presiding judge of the FISC and therefore represented interests. So to ensure that this didn't make either side uncomfortable with my presiding over this criminal case, and I think particularly the defense would have reason to have some facial concern about this. I had my chambers reach out to counsel on Monday to advise them that I would be raising this potential recusal issue at the outset of today's hearing. And I had my chambers inform counsel that either side could move for my recusal at the outset of this hearing, and that I would not require argument, and that I would be happy to recuse with no further questions asked.
I enabled each side to have two days to consider their position, and so I'll turn to that now. Mr. Scarpelli, do the government wish recuse from presiding over this case? No, Your Honor. No, Your Honor.
Thank you, Mr. Schurr. Does the defense wish me to recuse from presiding over this case? No, Your Honor. No, Your Honor.
Does either side have any questions as to my involvement in this matter in the FISC or my FISC role as it relates to this case, Mr. Sharpelle? The government does not know. Mr. Scherer?
No questions from the government. Okay. All right. Is the government prepared to proceed with the plea today? Yes, your honor.
Yes, your honor. Is the defense? Yes, judge. Okay. Then I'm going to have the court of deputy swear Mr.
Klein Smith in before we proceed.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Full interview with Sam Cooper, talking Chinese infiltration in Canadian politics. It will blow your mind and terrify you. SHARE! https://t.co/c2AujIDBgU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sam Cooper, a Canadian journalist, discusses Chinese transnational money laundering in Vancouver and Toronto real estate, estimating over a trillion dollars laundered through the "Vancouver model." He was motivated by the pricing out of young Canadians from the housing market. He believes Canada has "lost the plot" and is being infiltrated by Chinese organized crime and state actors, posing a threat to America.
Vancouver's high property prices were supported by offshore money laundering and narcotics funds from China, laundered through Canadian casinos and real estate. Hong Kong tycoons, some allegedly working for the Chinese Communist Party and connected to triads, bought up large portions of Vancouver. Underground banking facilitates money leaving China, often drug money laundered through casinos and real estate.
Chinese police stations in Canada are used to blackmail, extort, and surveil Chinese Canadians, with connections to organized crime. The Liberal Party of Canada is allegedly the favored party of Beijing, though other parties are also targeted. The US government is concerned about Chinese influence in Canada, including the fentanyl crisis, believing Beijing wants to harm North Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. If you don't know who Sam Cooper is, you're gonna know who he is now. You're gonna wanna know who he is now, and I've been waiting to get this interview for a long, long time. We're gonna touch on the Canadian stuff, but this is gonna touch on American stuff as well. I'm gonna let Sam introduce himself, actually.
Sam Cooper's an amazing Canadian journalist. One of the last of the true journalist kinds. Okay. That's it. That's all I'm gonna do now.
Add to stage. Mister Cooper, sir, how goes the battle?
Speaker 1: Battle's going well, and, I'm I'm really glad to meet you. And when you say this is this is gonna be about Canada, but it's also very much about The United States and what's going on in the world.
Speaker 0: Well, it's it's amazing because I think this is gonna open I I think everybody who watches this channel, although there's a lot of new people, know the degree to which the Trump tariffs or at least the Trump concerns about the border were not pretextual in any way, shape, or form. They rely on the same talking points they get from the media here. Only 1% of fentanyl is caught from the border, so it's not a problem. But we'll get into all of it because you are I mean, I won't say one of you're one of a handful of true journalists left. Tell people who you are.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I've been in journalism for twenty years. I was thinking about going down your path of being a lawyer when I was when my undergrad at University of Toronto. My family's been in Canada for a couple generations. My parents went to U of T.
Now my young son has just entered U of T. I did my history, philosophy, and English. I was gonna be a lawyer, and then I I just said, yeah. I didn't like what was going on in the OJ trial so much at that time. Why don't I try to be a writer?
But I can bring in, you know, the the fact finding, the love of truth, you know, the rigorous research, and try to find the biggest, craziest, you know, interesting stories in the world. And, you know, to jump to the chase, I was a young reporter in Vancouver when I finally got into it. I had my journalism degree, and I was, really personally motivated because me and my family, you know, making pretty good money. We're doing pretty well in Canada, but we're priced out of the city, and it's just rocketing away. So I had to figure out why Vancouver's prices were, like, 10 to 12 times a family income.
The you remember the US subprime crisis, how the the American dream was stolen from a lot of people, you know, through subprime, dirty loans, etcetera. I discovered to jump to the chase that Vancouver's housing prices were materially supported by offshore money laundering, narcotics funds pouring in from China, and laundered through Canadian government casinos, Canadian real estate to the point where I'll you know, this is a decade ago where I started this journey of understanding what's behind Vancouver and Toronto's real estate prices. Now I can say trillions, over a trillion dollars has been laundered through Toronto and Vancouver real estate through what came to be known as the Vancouver model of Chinese transnational money laundering. And that was a phrase termed by a professor who started looking at my work at the Vancouver Sun. And so that's the quick intro.
I'm look. I'm a journalist that I think it's important to say I was motivated by why myself and young people, hardworking Canadians, tax paying Canadians were being priced out of cities. And I was at the start of a curve that I believe is now the the driving issue in Canada for young people. They believe they'll never have a home, and they're right unless something deep changes. But so many places to go.
I guess the last thing I would say is, look. I'm a I've always felt Canadians and Americans are are two side we're brothers and sisters. There's a lot of tension going on now, but we can never really be separated. We're, like, we're so close, and yet I do believe Canada, the government has lost the plot. And the Washington, not just Donald Trump, but at a state level, they're deeply concerned that Canada, like the Caribbean, like Latin America, is being infiltrated by Chinese organized crime, Chinese state actors, and at the end of the day, it's an attack on America.
Speaker 0: Okay. It's wild, and you said a lot. I don't know if you if we wanna start, you know, present
Speaker 1: to Bob or
Speaker 0: or back to present. For anybody who doesn't know, van we talked about it yesterday. Vancouver is I I don't mean to it's gonna sound terrible. Mandarin is the second language. The the Chinese population in Vancouver, it's always been known.
We've it's it's always it's never been an issue in the sense that it's just it's the way Vancouver developed. You say its closest landing point in Canada to, to China, to Asia. It's always been the the the the the property prices in Vancouver have always been wild. It's only been so see more recent in Toronto, But it's so it's I mean, explain that to us in terms of how, say, the Chinese money ended up owning so much real estate in Vancouver and which you know, and that interplay with the government, whichever government was in charge at that time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I will break this down a little bit more slowly. I moved to Vancouver in 02/2003. At this point, prices were already probably about a million dollars per home on average. And Vancouver, the the family income is down at, like, 60 to 70,000 at that time.
This is not like San Francisco, New York, Boston, you know, an American city with, like, really strong financial economy. Right? Vancouver, it's a really beautiful looking place. But I discovered to, you know, to break it down very simply, from the late eighties and nineties, major funds start flowing in from Hong Kong and China. These are, you know, really Hong Kong tycoons bought up the city.
And, you know, people didn't have a big problem with that. You know, no one was digging too deep into the real nature of that money. But I discovered through years of work that these Hong Kong tycoons are the very same people that are just getting the boot out of Panama now through the state department saying and Donald Trump saying, we can't have Chinese businessmen that we know are working for Beijing, and we know whether they say this or not, Marco Rubio, we know are working or are organized crime. They can't control that choke point of Panama, you know, if, god forbid, a war happens. So this is what was happening in Vancouver from the late eighties.
Man named Lee Kushing, again Hold on. Key I'm sorry. Key to Panama, bought up 20% of Vancouver, and it goes from there.
Speaker 0: His name is Kushing? I mean, I'm not I'm not even making fun of the.
Speaker 1: You know, you gotta you gotta reverse it. So last name first, Li, l I, Kaxing. But Kaxing, yeah, he makes he makes a lot of Kaxing. This is the richest guy in Asia, but the key thing here is that my work showed, he's rich partly because he's working for the Chinese Communist Party, and the the allegations in documents I know I'm talking to a lawyer here. Western intelligence, there's no secret.
You can find it in congressional hearings from the US military. Mister Lika Shing, who, by the way, again, 20% of Vancouver, he buys it up to develop in late eighties. He is connected to Chinese military and allegedly what are called triads of Hong Kong. So that's one of the most powerful transnational crime organizations. And let me just jump up to the future.
I went from the eighties, nineties, '20 tens. By then, by the by 2010, I had determined, that about 30% of every real estate dollar spent in Vancouver is coming through what's called underground banking. And so this is how people get their money out of China essentially by going to Chinatown anywhere in the world, and Vancouver's got a huge one, taking out a loan and a cash loan and laundering it through casinos and real estate. The the trick here is this is drug cash, and there are these underground banks around the world. But that's the Vancouver story that I just dove right into until no one else understood this better than than myself.
Speaker 0: I guess fundamental question, why the initial investment in real estate in Canada? Is it to get money out of China into foreign into foreign lands where they can, I don't know, either launder it or is is it a long term military objective to infiltrate and take over Canada as of the eighties, or is this just criminal money trying to get it out of China so that they can dispose of it in foreign countries?
Speaker 1: That's a lawyer's mind question, and there's two things going on. Canada's FinCEN, it's called FinTrak, says this is a, a symbiotic trade. In China, you know, the communist, firewall, you're only supposed to take out 50,000 US dollars per year. That's their capital control. But as you know, corruption is completely endemic in China to get to the top.
You're, you know, you're taking bribes. You're working through organized crime. And so to get around that, you know, if you're ultra wealthy in China and you wanna get some money into Vancouver, Boston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Again, you make a deal with a gangster in the city where you wanna land. Let's focus on Vancouver. You say, I wanna get a million out.
I can't take it from my bank in China. I'm gonna show up outside a casino in Vancouver. You're gonna give me, you know, a million in cash, and I can launder it through that Canadian government casino because the government doesn't care. They're in on it. I gamble that money.
I get a check out of there, or I get my cash back in nice, you know, bank rolls. I can put my down payment on my condo. They also don't do due diligence in Canada for the real estate. Remember, you know, you're in Florida. This is like Miami Vice nineteen eighties, all the Latin American money pouring in.
Same thing in Vancouver, but it was all China. Let's circle back. You get that million dollar drug cash loan, gamble it, and you pay back in China where that organized crime entity also has banking. And this jumps into you know, once you pay back, it pays for the fentanyl precursors. More fentanyl comes into North America.
They collect the cash. Repeat the cycle. So this is what's the Vancouver model of real estate, and I'm saying 30% of, should be about 30% of the the real estate market is supported by that money from China that's coming through underground.
Speaker 0: Holy is it and now if is it commercial, residential, or a mix of both?
Speaker 1: It's a mix of both. So remember, I'm talking about Hong Kong tycoons buying up lands in the nineteen eighties. They're developing condo towers, and they are, you know, they got rich by being involved in organized crime, point blank. This gets back to your first question. Is it just a way to get money out of China, or is it a strategic way to, get a foothold in Canada?
Look. Western intelligence believes that this is a strategic play. You don't this is why. I mean, this is why China has these police stations planted in North America. They're gonna keep their eye on you if you get your money out, and they're gonna they're gonna do something to you and send you back to China unless you are working for Beijing.
So it's absolutely I'm going on what I believe and what people told me, you know, maybe five years ago, and I still couldn't believe them. I'm talking about law enforcement intelligence. They said, this isn't just money laundering. This is Chinese Communist Party military strategy. They wanna get a foothold in your cities.
So that answers your question. Two things going on.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I mean, it's an it's an amaze and I guess, like, you know, Chinese Communist Party expansion, who the heck are they gonna work with other than actual gang criminals to, and it's a win win for both criminal activity and for Chinese Communist Party expansion. Absolutely. Like, in terms I don't know what the rules were in the eighties and nineties. Now I presume there's a little bit of verification as to where the funds are coming from.
In terms of foreign nationals or even foreigners buying up real estate in the eighties and nineties, was there any regulation on it whatsoever or or minimal?
Speaker 1: It was just pure Wild West, in Vancouver in the nineteen eighties and nineties. It was my work. It took until 2017 when I broke the story of the Vancouver model. This launched a commission into money laundering, which as a Canadian, you know, when there's a big problem, they call a commission. They Nothing happens.
Table all the documents, and nothing happens. So the problem has gotten worse. Here's the key. Casino money laundering, a data point from that money laundering commission, one point four billion in cash was laundered through British Columbia, Canadian government regulated casinos in one year. One year.
And that is just, of of course, the tip of the iceberg of real estate, which is the bigger piece, and, Canadian banks are deeply involved. And I'll tell you this because you know I could ramble on for a while, but this is very interesting and key. During the pandemic, when the Canadian government casinos are locked down, Chinese organized crime shifts and evolves. They open up their own underground. They're not underground.
They were mansion casinos. So imagine in The United States, in a state, you've got a 50 room mansion that everyone can see it. Chinese organized crime was running these illegal mansion casinos in broad daylight. And so while those government casinos are locked down in the pandemic, they're evolving that way, and they're laundering money directly through Canadian banks. They're using the same people they would hire students to walk into casinos with that cash.
They would hire students to front bank accounts. And so this continues to happen to this day in Canada, in our major banks. And I believe and I can tell you because I'm conversant with officials in Washington, they're not worried about a backpack of fentanyl, you know, coming across the British Columbia border into Washington as much as they're worried about how Canadian banks are used at scale. So your question was, has it changed? Has it gotten harder?
No. Our our Canadian banks are used in sophisticated way to to launder multibillions of dollars.
Speaker 0: Holy hell, Sam. Okay. Now I got because I got a lot of questions. There was a story recently. When was it that there was a it was a mansion casino.
Like, you you're talking about there was a political scandal to it where there were politicians involved in going to this house in, I wanna say, Thorne was it in Toronto?
Speaker 1: Close to it was in Markham. So this is yeah. You know, just a suburb of Toronto, ultra wealthy, pretty high population of Chinese mainland migrants. And, yes, I did a number of stories digging deeper into the nature of that mansion, what the Markham or York Regional Police say is this was a facility to, you know, abet prostitution. It was a facility to abet, you know, funds for drug trafficking, to launder funds.
And the real key here, there it is. You know, look. This is broad daylight in Canada. This is a mansion. I mean, talk about That's Wow.
You know, every time I look at that, look at you know, you can see some gangsters there. There are other pictures where you got Canadian police geared up like they're, you know, the Mexican army going in for a raid. And that really makes sense because this is called what's running this show is called the company. This is a network of the leaders of global triads set up in Markham, Ontario. They were running prostitution there.
They were running just tremendous money laundering, and my information showed Canadian intelligence was interested because Chinese officials were there allegedly trying to corrupt Canadian politicians.
Speaker 0: This, I mean, I gotta this enrages me more than anything because I'm a very despite appearances, I'm a very, I don't wanna say kosher like, I'm a very simple person. The idea of these, you know, gambling debts, hookers and and prostitutes and the shit that they have on Canadian politicians because, like, I I remember at the time that they were saying the list of of frequenters of this place involved Canadian politicians. Some people say, well, you know, it's just it's just the bumping elbows with the rich donors, or it's a freaking blackmail scheme that you get them in there much like Epstein's Island, but on a smaller scale, and you own these politicians in Canadian parliament to not ever address this problem. Do do we know who the politicians were that were involved in this?
Speaker 1: Well, I am not I'm afraid at liberty to say due to legal things going on in Canada, but I among there were a number of reports there. And what I was searching for, like, it reminds you of Great Gatsby. Right? When you look at that mansion, but it's the Chinese intelligence and organized crime version. This is how they get their hooks into the elite of Toronto and Canada.
And, look, I reported, based on Canadian government sources that came to me, they said, York Regional Police captured videotapes inside the mansion that raised the concern that Canadian politicians could have been exposed to activities with women and that this could be a scheme of the Chinese state to, as you say, get their hooks in and leverage. Call it a mini Epstein Island, an intelligence play involving Chinese organized crime leveraged by Chinese intelligence. So, yes, this is what I'm told by, you know, your American, you know, viewers won't be as familiar with the scandal that broke in Canada about China interfering in elections. I'm the one that broke that story and the same people that brought that story to me because they knew that I understood the Vancouver model and how China is using crime. They said, look.
There's more to that Markham story, and it's about China using organized crime to corrupt Canadian politicians.
Speaker 0: You you will we're gonna flesh it out because I I've covered the story, but I we've talked about it on the channel, China interfering with the Canadian elections. Can you flesh out flesh it out exactly what happened? I mean, there are, you know, the the superficial elements of bussing in Chinese students. I don't know if they were there to vote or impact the liberal I don't know. Call them primaries.
But can you flesh out the Chinese influence and how it how it did impact or interplay with elections?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the big story that I broke, before I started my own platform, the bureau, when I was with Global News, you know, a national broadcaster, was that in the twenty nineteen election, Canadian federal election, Canadian intelligence based out of Toronto discovered that China's corruption networks, which are called the United Front Work Department, working through the Chinese consulate, leveraging local so called diaspora community leaders together with Canadian political candidates and their staff were involved in a clandestine election interference ring. And this came from documents that I read and reported on. 11 federal election candidates in 2019 just in the Toronto area were alleged to be either, you know, working knowingly with Beijing. You talked about buses and students going into support in a a certain candidate.
So 11 candidates, some of them, according to Canadian intelligence, were very knowing and working with China, some of them not so aware. But, nevertheless, the allegation is that China chose 11 candidates and supported them through what's called its united front work department. And not to get off track, but this is the same entity that's cited in the, you know, the New York state corruption case where you got a high level political staffer working for two governors. And what she was doing was blocking engagement with Taiwan, you know, crafting speeches for the governors. She's part of the united front.
I wanna make that connection because same thing in Canada.
Speaker 0: Okay. Part of the same organization or or, like, intertwine with the Canadian. And this is Hochul, and who was the other governor and who was the
Speaker 1: other And Cuomo. So, yeah, this is this is what I wanna explain. Xi Jinping has something called the United Front Work Department. Again, they have interlinkages with immigrants around the world who they call overseas Chinese, and they actually believe they have communist, you know, loyalty to people even though they're citizens of other countries. So they send out, you know, spymasters among the community, and they they leverage local politicians.
They try to plant people like that staffer with Hoco and Cuomo and get them to influence the people. So this is exactly what was happening in the Canadian election interference story. But because we're Canada, we don't have any charges resulting out of that finding that in the twenty nineteen election, eleven candidates just in the Toronto area. And this is important in Canada right now because as you know, we're facing a new election. Nothing has changed.
But that was just one major story that I broke. It gets into the Chinese police stations, connections with underground casinos, and it does connect to The United States. It's fun.
Speaker 0: It's so it's Sam, it's it's wild. It's like Tom Clancy. I don't even know if that's the right author. This is this is wild level stuff. Do we not mention the names of the 11 politicians because no charges have been fought, or you and I'm not saying this I'm not trying to make fun.
Like, nobody wants to get sued. Or is there a reason why we don't know their names or why
Speaker 1: Well, personally, reporting for the national news media, and I heard you in an intro talk about legal sort of niceties in in saying various things, I was subject of let me count them. I named I named I named a number of politicians, and that resulted in and by the way, all facts essentially supported in a following government inquiry, which while whitewashing the deeper issues, affirmed the facts that I reported. But but the the thing here is that politicians were named, those politicians sued. And as you know, Canada is a sort of a weaker freedom of speech and freedom of media expression jurisdiction. So if you wanna name them but I I believe that there's some procedures coming up very quickly in Canada, and I'd I probably it won't serve me to name.
Let's just say that they are Chinese Canadians that allegedly were knowingly working for this united front. That's the essence of the story, and it's the same alligator there he is.
Speaker 0: Well, this is New York Times, so go go after the New York Times. Canadian lawmaker testifies Chinese students were bust into elect of Handong. I I remember that name. A member of parliament who was accused of benefiting from the Chinese government's health testified at a public hearing on foreign interference. I mean, he benefits from it, and then he becomes the witness to try to root out the corruption even though
Speaker 1: So this is the story that I broke. Mister Don, strongly denies the allegations that he was aware that Chinese proxies allegedly bust in Chinese international students into a Toronto riding in 2019 to support him in the nomination or primary, if you wanna call it, you know, to to make him the candidate to run on in election. And the key thing here is that Canadian intelligence says, you don't have to, fix an election in Canada. You just have to pick a riding that you believe is gonna vote, you know, democratic or republican for Americans, conservative for a liberal Canada. So you pick the one that you know your party is gonna win, and then you get a nominee in there.
And if you support them and if they're dirty, they're gonna be working for China. That's the theory. That's the allegation.
Speaker 0: The was it was the accusation that the buses were brought in during the liberal race for the candidate or during the federal election itself?
Speaker 1: During the liberal race, this candidate, won the nomination. And as far as I understand, there my last word was there was still an elections Canada investigation ongoing in into events around that riding. And so look. I don't care what lawyer you are in Canada. The the amount of alleged activities in that writing, anyone looking at it can say that's pretty scary.
And yet let's be fair. This individual, yes, he has, used his right to file lawsuit and says he had no no involvement in any wrongdoing.
Speaker 0: Well and, I mean, everybody who's watching because I talk enough about Canada that they know that, you know, the judiciary is in lockstep with the government. It it seems that the police or the authorities are, to some extent, in lockstep with the government. So you get a a a powerful political individual suing an independent oh, I don't know if you're independent, but I'm I don't mean like that, suing a journalist. You know where you you could you could you could flip that coin and know which which side it's gonna land on every time because both sides are the same. Handong so he was running.
He get among other liberals that I presume was he the only Chinese, liberal running, or were there others that they're just hedging their bets as to who wins?
Speaker 1: In that writing, there were a couple of people of Chinese Canadians and, you know, whether more comes out of that elections candidate investigation there, there were a few candidates because it's a writing, you know, very high heavily populated by Hong Kong and more recently much more Mainland China immigrants. And look, I've reported, you know, not talking about specific politicians, but I've reported on documents that literally say, you know, Canadian intelligence overheard Chinese consulate officials saying that Chinese immigrants are very easy to influence for Beijing, and therefore Beijing believes election to election, it likes its chances more in Canada because it's getting you know, as the population of migration goes up, Beijing thinks it can influence those people. And at the end of the day, they wanna protect the the regime in Beijing. That's that's what Canadian intelligence believes.
Speaker 0: I would I I'm not like, people can call me a xenophobe if they want, but born in Shanghai, moves to Canada, Eighteen, Twenty Percent of Canadian MPs are born outside of Canada, or are not born Canadian citizens, and you you wonder how and why this happens. Bring it back a little bit to the connection to the Panama Canal and what Trump is doing there because I think, you know, people don't understand Trump is not an idiot. There he knows more than most people when he makes certain decisions or makes certain statements, and there he he makes very few mistakes on purpose. Sorry. By accident, I should say.
Speaker 1: So I I made a note. Let me get into Panama. But what you said I mean, I got a little story to share because you just triggered me a little bit. Look. We all know by now that all Western intelligence says that the lab in Wuhan was the originator of of the pandemic that killed millions, and we we still don't have justice on that.
I mean, it hasn't been proven in court, but m I six, CIA, FBI. Look. I was told by one of these people that helped me break stories. When president Trump said, you know, if you remember, he knows it's you came out of Wuhan. He can't tell you why.
He can't say anymore. I was I this this takes me back to around 2020. I was talking to a Canadian intelligence official for a reason, and they said Trump's not wrong. He's correct, and we know it in Canada too. So it's very difficult for me to live through the pandemic knowing that.
And, you know, this is the nature of my work. I I know some things just because I I develop a lot of knowledge. People in government know that I understand, so they'll share something. To your point, yeah, Trump, I mean, I think he's muddying the waters in terms of, you know, trade security. But at the end of the day, it is correct that China and The US are are getting very close to war, so much closer than most people know.
I've traveled to Taiwan at the invitation of their government. I know how close war is. Trump is worried about Panama again because China uses people like mister Li Keqing who has about 40 ports around the world. But as the US military, people can go into congressional hearings and say, you know, from a a former general or admiral saying, Li Keqing is a front for Chinese military intelligence. It's not exactly him owning those ports in Panama, but he is working with the Beijing state in a very complex way.
So Trump, Rubio, you know, whoever you wanna say, the CIA, FBI, the US military, they're concerned that when we go kinetic in a war, China will blockade or have control of that choke point. And it's the same story I'm arguing in Mexico. People look at cartels. They not very many people know that Chinese organized crime perhaps, you know, predominant to the cartels in terms of, you know, being the financiers and providing the fentanyl precursors, etcetera, etcetera. So the US government is very concerned about Chinese influence in Mexico.
They're concerned in Canada as well, which is hard for people to understand. And I think that that gets to the sort of the whole fentanyl, the tariffs. What I'm telling you is it's really about Canadian banks, Canadian politicians, Canadian real estate. The US government is concerned about Panama like it's concerned about Canada.
Speaker 0: You make me terrified right now because it it makes a lot of sense where discussion about Greenland never existed before a couple of months ago and and never existed before Trump won the election. Discussion about the Panama Canal and the control of it or the problems of it never existed until now. And people are saying, you know, it's to secure trade routes. Maybe. But if if if it might also be because Trump does like you say now, if he knows that we're closer to a kinetic war than most people know, the urgency to secure the the North America, the continent, and the North Of North America becomes the the emphasis becomes understandable because otherwise, it doesn't make sense.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And and you know what? When you say it's never come up before, actually, people can go to you the congress it's it's senator congress nineteen ninety seven. An admiral comes in and testifies, and he says, we are a little bit worried that Bill Clinton and the Gore administration has allowed Li Keqing and this company called Hutchison Wampoa to buy access to the Panama Canal. We are concerned because Li Keqing has connections to Chinese military fronts.
Right? So, actually, it has come up before. And what do you know? It's sort of that same dichotomy between the Democrats being a lot more opening to Chinese money and investment. And I could just ramble on about there was something called China gate in 1995 when Bill Clinton welcomed, you know, what we now know is, you know, a Chinese gangster into the White House about 10 times.
So all of this was going on in the nineties in The States, and it's only bubbled up to the surface again now. This is sort of you know, I studied a little bit of history in the University of Toronto, and that allows me to bring history into my journalism.
Speaker 0: I'm getting as you the more you the more you talk, the more terrified I'm getting in terms of now, you know, also
Speaker 1: Americans should be terrified. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, in in retrospect, and appreciating what you know, calling him Beijing Joe or Beijing Biden and his level of of of either corruption or being bought out by and owned by Chinese interests, k. So hold on. Panama Canal, there's been some some disagreement as to what is actually going on in the Panama Canal. China, who who controls it? And and what is well, what is the level of Chinese control slash involvement with the Panama Canal?
Because I don't think many people even ever appreciated that before two months ago.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So it's very similar in a way to Vancouver, but much more important. Who controls it is that Chinese investors like Li Ka Shing, richest man in Asia, own a tremendous amount of real estate, own the port, own a lot of factories. You could say there's a pan Panamanian government, but in effect, I mean, if you really break it down and if you believe what the US government and intelligence believes, China owns it. Right?
I mean and I'm not joking here. I've read Canadian government documents that say Belize is literally owned by Chinese triads. And when I say owned, you know, the Chinese triads, have bribed the highest levels of government. So, yeah, you can own a Latin American nation as China, and yet China is not on the sticker as the government. You know, I that's pretty we could get deeper, but it's simply about, you know, what is called, they they call them Belt and Road deals where China makes infrastructure investments in sort of poorer nations.
And by owning ports or extending ninety nine year loans, they get significant control of critical infrastructure. So that's what's going on in Panama.
Speaker 0: Okay. Very I mean, that's that's interesting, and it explains are you you're familiar with Michael Yon? Yes. Okay. And because his his and I there's two people that I respect.
His his position on this was was, I think, more in line with what you're describing and and different from another individual who I also very much respect and appreciate. Indirect indirect tacit ownership or control over what was given to Panama, though through through America. Okay. So let me let me let me let me
Speaker 1: Yeah. Let me put a fine point. They call them proxies. So, again, this is the same thing going on in Canadian cities, going on in the Chinese police station story. You got a low local businessman of extreme wealth, a Chinese immigrant, and Chinese intelligence finds a way to make them work for Beijing.
Proxy ownership.
Speaker 0: And it is a I I'm a total buffoon. It's a series of canals. It's not an open it's not an open waterway. And the ownership I mean, I presume the the fact that it's a series of locks makes the the Chinese ownership over over land more effective?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, Panama, of course, owns it on paper, but the US government concern is if Li Keqing, this this Hong Kong multibillionaire, owns the port, then if if Xi Jinping, the Chinese president, tells him to shut it down and The US wants to send merchant marine or something through, you know, effectively, China has control. And, you know, I've made the kind of military connection. It it's not a stretch at all because look. Taiwan, they've just put out an intelligence report in the past two months that says China had uses organized crime in Taiwan to establish, a shadow sort of military force within the society. So if a war happens, China will use organized crime in other nations, you know, especially ones of like Taiwan.
Speaker 0: Holy hell. Okay. Now bringing it back up to the North and bringing it back up to Canada, the Chinese police stations, which which are were reported on, denied by legacy media to some extent. The purpose of these police stations, they these are effectively to blackmail, extort, surveil Chinese Canadians or Chinese people who are in Canada or even Chinese Canadian born Chinese who have family back in China in order to coerce behavior in Canada by threatening family abroad?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. This is, like, really in my wheelhouse. So I'll tell you this. You showed that picture of that great Gatsby's mansion in Markham. Look.
My proven intelligence sources say the Chinese police station story in Toronto can be connected very clearly to that, casino mansion that is people with interest in the mansion are the same so called wealthy local Chinese businessmen that are involved allegedly in running the Chinese police stations. And so how that works is, you know, you've got a a wealthy guy that owns a grocery store in Markham. You know, that grocery store can be turned into an unofficial Chinese embassy, literally. And so you got a Chinese intelligence official will travel in, talk to the local gangster, say, we wanna yank this guy in that's criticizing Xi Jinping on Facebook or, you know, is, you know, raising a ruckus about what's happening with the Uighurs in Xinjiang. You can pull them in your grocery store, let them know that we're interested in questioning them.
And so that's a way for the Chinese police state to operate on Canadian soil. And, you know, as you know, it's happening in New York state exactly the same way. A lot of it involves migrants from the province called Fujian, which is, you know, just a very gang infested Chinese southern coastal area, which interestingly is right across from Taiwan. I'll tell you one more one more example here in the police station file. Montreal, they had one of these so called police stations, And I kid you not, it was a a community service center supposedly for giving, you know, services to Chinese migrants to help them adjust to Canadian society.
They were getting Canadian government funding to do this, and this was one of the alleged Chinese police stations. So they're gathering, you know, identity data from Canadian citizens, but, really, they are Chinese police. So it's just an incredible intelligence operation. Right? They they're on Canadian soil getting money from Canada to, quote, unquote, provide services, but they're really gaining intelligence from those people they wanna monitor.
Speaker 0: Why I mean, it's just gonna be a stupid question. Why isn't the government doing anything about it? Is it lack of means? Is it is it already adequate in, infiltration? Is it fear?
Is it or is it a combination of all three? Like, this should be relatively easy to remedy. This is quite clearly an issue of national security. It's quite clearly a a known problem, a documented problem. Why do they not why has nothing been done at the government level?
Speaker 1: Right. So I I would point to maybe two or three points. One, the United States, as you know, has a FARA, a foreign agent registration act. Mhmm. And each and every successful prosecution so far there in New York state, they they hit these local proxy Chinese businessmen and say, we got you you know, we got text messages between you and this ministry of public security in Fujian province, you know, arranging to run the police station, arranging to go harass this guy in Long Island or, you know, you know, we've got a tape of the guy that you were talking to, you know, kinda like walking up to the door, painting it red, leaving, you know, threatening letters that they would the Chinese police wanna send this guy back to China.
Look. The United States can prosecute him by saying, you are working for China because we got your text messages. You're saying you're doing it. You're getting paid. You're getting benefits, but you didn't register as a foreign agent.
Right? So it's just an easy slam dunk case. Should be. In Canada, we don't have that. Right?
And as you know, I mean, Canada also has a charter of rights which is supposed to be, you know, very good protection against government overreach. But my work shows it's used by, you know, Chinese, Russian, Iranian. Lots of bad people working for foreign governments have protection against, you know, prosecution. The other thing, as you said, is this kind of, like, is the fix in? Look.
I can tell you that speaking to this Montreal CCP police station, a key Canadian senator has stood in front of there and and said, Canadian police, you know, I support these poor people suing you because you haven't proven your case, and you're now discriminating against Chinese Canadians. This is a powerful Canadian senator named Yuan Pao Wu, who, by the way, you know, is very, you know, supportive of all Beijing's policy and talking points in Canada's house. So does that indicate that Canadian Canada's government isn't really behind, you know, prosecuting there? That's only one example. I could point to a lot more kinda smoky cases like that.
Speaker 0: I was I wanna make the lighthearted joke that I presume you don't eat in Chinatown restaurants anymore. Like, if they if they have spies who are out or or agents out, I I presume they, you know, might not like it too much.
Speaker 1: I'll I'll tell you. I mean, I've shared this story before, but I I'm personally not a fearful person. I I have some security measures and some training, etcetera, but I was I was in 2023 after I broke the story of, you know, the Chinese interference in police stations. Canadian national security police visited me and said they had learned about a threat towards me. I'm still here, and I'm still, you know, doing my best to protect Canada and and maybe get some real laws in place because I don't think Canadian journalists should be getting those types of threats.
And I did get one, but I'm here.
Speaker 0: No. Look. I think the the the Canadian journalists don't get it because they don't do the work that you're doing because they seem to be working in finance by the very same government that's infiltrated by the very people you're investigating. Hold on. This is as is this as endemic to the conservatives as it is to the liberals?
Speaker 1: No. My research, which is based on documentation, is that the Liberal Party of Canada is the favored party of Beijing. That is is more supported by these united front networks. And I think we well, not to get off topic. Yeah.
So but all the documents also say that the conservatives and the NDP, the other major party, are targeted. And I'll give you an example. You know, back to Vancouver, I have worked on and exposed cases where a a key Chinese proxy operative has supported a leader of the NDP, I believe, has supported a leadership candidate for the conservatives, have supported liberals. So, again, it goes across. Beijing doesn't care about, you know, politics per se.
But if you are the liberals or the democrats in The United States and you open your doors more to, you know, donations, influence, then, you know, that's gonna be what it's gonna be. You'll be more infiltrated.
Speaker 0: K. That that's actually phenomenally interesting. So at least I get to criticize the liberals as being more Chinese infiltrated than the conservatives, although the conservatives don't have totally clean hands. Do you do you understand why Pierre Poliev doesn't want to agree to whatever would be required to in order to have access to who the 11 or so politicians that have been infiltrated are?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That became a big story in Canada. And, you know, my my take on that is, the liberals are much more open to corruption and foreign influence, but the party of Pierre Pauliev certainly does have its problems with regards to China. I know one conservative senator, he actually just retired, should be involved in these Toronto Chinese organized crime corruption act targeting. Let's put it that way.
And mister Polyev, certainly, if he gets the security clearance, he is gonna learn of some concerning cases with regards to China, India, and other nations in his party. Having said that, it's my belief that, the conservative party is more has more concern for security with regards to foreign interference, but as it their their hands are not clean at all.
Speaker 0: Okay. And what what what were the terms that Pierre would not agree to in order to get the clearance? I forget what it was. I can Google it afterwards. It's not a not it's
Speaker 1: a detail. Do with I mean, their his argument is if I get
Speaker 0: disclosure, that he he can't divulge the
Speaker 1: information Exactly. And, you know, some people think there's something to that argument. If he can't be a critic, he can't slam the government in the same way, you know, when
Speaker 0: No. It's a good it's a good way of gagging Pierre into an upcoming election and say, oh, you agreed not to talk about it, but now now you know, but you can't you can't use it against us.
Speaker 1: True. Yep.
Speaker 0: Okay. I wanna say it humorously. Is Theresa Tam a man? I've I've seen allegations online that Theresa Tam was once a man.
Speaker 1: I I mean, I've seen those headlines, but I I I have dug no deep print to them that I have about a French leading couple at all. No. I have no idea.
Speaker 0: Fair enough. Well, I'll be on alright. It's a very nice trip. Get out and close the door. Okay.
Now so we're talking the upcoming election now has been will be declared. I mean, I I guess the the concerns of every every Canadian out there are are not just wholly legitimate, but, they don't even know how concerned they should be is basically what I'm surmising from this.
Speaker 1: A %. I mean, on on the just on the in evidence during the campaign, the Chinese, communist party used WeChat. That is their communist controlled, you know, Mandarin messaging system. It's like, I don't know, Facebook messenger for for the diaspora from China, and they attacked Mark Carney's main opponent, Kristia Freeland, which is interesting because, you know, she had, among the liberals, she had actually taken a bit of regulatory action against a bank that allegedly China was trying to control in Toronto. So very clearly, Mark Carney is, the favorite of Beijing, much like Justin Trudeau was the favorite of Beijing.
And I've done a dive on the bureau about how, Kearney running Brookfield has some major investments in Chinese commercial real estate in Shanghai with a Hong Kong tycoon. And if you if you're following what I've been saying about Hong Kong tycoons and their connections to Beijing, I mean, that should raise some big question marks for Canadian voters and probably in Washington too.
Speaker 0: Now that you now that you mention it, when when we know, at least, you know, we got out of some Pauliev Marc Carney back and forth a while back, he's admitted that, you know, he they're invested in pipelines in nations that or countries that don't have the same regulations that we have, developing nations. Are are to what extent are those pipelines or those, resources in foreign countries themselves Chinese owned into which Brookfield Assets Management is investing in a foreign country that's not China, but which has China exploited, resources in those countries?
Speaker 1: That a brilliant question. So I know because I've reported on it. Mark Carney, through a global net zero initiative, is involved himself in, you know, a a Brazil infrastructure play with a Chinese communist controlled sort of international bank. So that's not Brookfield per se, but that's Mark Carney, you know, being involved in Brazil with the Chinese Communist Party controlled, development bank. So that sort of thing within Brookfield, I'm certain that you know, because I've seen, Brookfield is involved in Chinese supposedly, you know, green infrastructure initiatives.
I believe in Latin America, and that comes back to the sort of Panama thing. Right? If Brookfield and Mark Carney are deeply into infrastructure with Beijing money in Latin America. Again, if I'm Washington, I'm concerned about that.
Speaker 0: Sam, I I just put a two and two together and connected the dots. This just blew my mind. I've been saying for the last while that the boycott, the 100% tariff on Tesla only benefits China, you know, not not knowing what you know, but just being mildly suspicious because everything that they're doing right now in terms of fighting the Trump tariffs only benefits China. Everything that they're doing in terms of energy crippling policy in Canada only benefits China, and this all makes the most depressing amount of sense conceivable.
Speaker 1: In terms of, you know, if China is behind green policy and if we wanna use the military playbook that they would want to limit other countries that do have, you know, carbon powered, fuel or, you know, if they wanna limit limit Elon Musk in in what he's doing and leverage him, yeah, those are all those are all from the military playbook.
Speaker 0: And I don't even consider it green energy because I do not consider the EV batteries to be greener than than than than gas. But the argument is, in terms of getting the rare earth minerals, it's if you if you if you don't develop it within North America and you cripple the the American companies, it's only gonna benefit China in every respect. Oh, okay. That's
Speaker 1: Let me add one to you. You know, being Canadian, how much control, you know, for jurisdiction the indigenous people have in the rare earths areas?
Speaker 0: They they they own the land.
Speaker 1: They own the land, and China, of course, is deeply involved in in in probably has a better chance of getting those minerals than Canada because Canada is so broken in terms of governance. But, certainly, every play that's going on in global energy, China is is is making a levered, you know, effort to try to control, resources in other lands.
Speaker 0: The it it is it explains absolutely everything, and it's amazing that you actually have Canadian politicians in their in their fight against America, and they're cloaking themselves in the Canadian flag are fighting literally for China. The fentanyl business, because this was actually what we should have you know, what what got us talking in the first place. Explain the Chinese connection to the fentanyl production in Canada. I've been saying for a while, it's not my thought and it's not my original thought, but I think it's the correct analysis. It is chemical warfare against the fighting age population of America in particular.
Yeah. If if if it were China trying to poison, which they've been doing in record numbers, the fighting age generation of America, explain what their connection is to the fentanyl production, fentanyl crisis in America, but in Canada in particular.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. You nailed it there. And this is the type of thing where I I wrote a book in 2021 called Willful Blindness when this was, like, so far out there, leading edge thought that, I mean, my police and intelligence sources were saying, fentanyl is not just about organized crime. It's not just about Chinese organized crime.
Right? It's about precursors produced in Chinese factories that that Beijing if it doesn't want those precursors to go out and, you know, harm other people, it can crush them. It will stop them very easily. But the American government knew that for some reason, Beijing was not stopping those precursors. And when, you know, fentanyl is banned because the US government gets gets angry, then they just, like, tweak a few chemicals and send a new precursor out, send it into the West Coast Of Mexico, send it into the West Coast Of Canada, and that becomes your offshore production node where you have significant Chinese organized crime using the infrastructure, the money laundering infrastructure.
Again, let's focus on that Vancouver model. It there's just the real estate, the casinos. And so you produce the fentanyl there. You ship it to Australia, New Zealand, around the world from Vancouver. A lot of it, I believe, much more than people know, going down into The States.
And just through very sophisticated trades in Canada, they're even sending it from Mexico into California. But, you know, we could go on and on about how I understand the the pipes and squeakers of the finance and how China wants this to happen, but people don't have to take my word. There's a great Canadian mayor in Vancouver named Brad West. He was so vocal about China essentially taking blood money and killing Canadians. One of the few politicians ahead of the curve, you know, that we hear now in Washington.
It that in 2023, Anthony Blinken came up and visited him. And I've talked to this mayor from Canada, and he disclosed that mayor mister Blinken said, look. We know that is the American government knows Beijing wants to harm North Americans. They wanna profit from this, and they want to kill North Americans. They wanna cause chaos.
They want the fabric of society pulling apart. They wanna weaken us. And, you know, he, again, this great Canadian mayor said, I can tell you that, Anthony Blinken said the American government knows that the Chinese organized crime is working with the Chinese Communist Party, is working with the Latin cartels. They're all involved in this trade. It's corrupt, and it's directed against Americans.
The one more thing that blew my mind, you know, when we talk about why is this happening in Canada, Anthony Blinken said that US government was losing confidence that Canada had the capacity to crack down on organized crime and fentanyl and to the point where Americans who have great intelligence were were were holding back what they knew in Canada because they were concerned about corruption in Canada's enforcement and potentially government. So just all kinds of mind blowing things, but the most that China wants to kill Americans.
Speaker 0: No. But that that America has intelligence on Canada that it can't or doesn't feel comfortable sharing with Canada because of the degree of corruption they might be disclosing to their adversary the compromising information that they have on their adversary.
Speaker 1: This is what a a great Canadian mayor told me. And in fact, I had, you know, a podcast with him for the bureau, and he publicly posted on x that he he got threats to his family after, you know, disclosing this in this interview. Again, if you're seeing the theme there, I mean, threats are going around the way they should not be in Canada, and it's due to the infiltration from China.
Speaker 0: This is wild. I'm looking to see if the chat is I believe they're as blown away as I am. If people are it's actually with Tam. I got is Tam CCP over, on Rumble? I mean
Speaker 1: No. Can I can I speak to that? I mean, I I don't know anything about anything about her personality or or or or gender. I I I take it at face value. Let me put it this way.
But what I do know is that Canada's Canada's lab was subject of sending dangerous viral material to Wuhan. This was covered up by the Canadian government. You know, people can read the documents on this.
Speaker 0: The the two the two Chinese scientists defected to China and disappeared into the CCP.
Speaker 1: They disappeared. The RCMP was investigating them and let them go. Right? You can't get out of a country without, like, the, the border officials letting you go. So that's just one of those ones that makes you say, okay.
I mean, China had a deep, deep, deep influence in Canada's level four lab. None of this is controversial. China, using these Chinese Canadian scientists, was sending, you know, Ebola materials to the same lab that the CIA and everyone else now says was involved in bat viruses. One of the Canadian, you know, scientists in her the one that got away and went back to China, she was involved, you know, with the American controversial researchers in the bat virus research. So no one's saying that the virus came from Canada, but they are saying that this woman in Winnipeg that escaped Canada was working or helping that Wuhan project, not sending materials.
But what where does this come to Theresa Tam? Look. As a diligent investigator, I did what's called access to information requests on what happened in that lab, and I found that Theresa Tam, head of Health Canada, signed off on one of the travel requests for this doctor Chu in Winnipeg to go over to Beijing. And, you know, if I really knew I'm not saying that Theresa Tam knew what this Chinese spy in Winnipeg was up to. Also What I'm saying is that she signed off on a trip that quite clearly and evidently was for this Canadian Chinese scientist to meet with intelligence handlers in China.
So why is Theresa Tam not answering questions about that? I mean, I'm not saying she's wrongful there. I'm saying, well, should you have known better?
Speaker 0: I wanna just do a double check one thing. Theresa Tam, born in British Hong Kong, our head of our head of, you know, the COVID task response team. It might also explain why Justin Trudeau was donating our PPE to China in February 2020 before COVID was coming to Canada. Holy hell, Sam. It's it's worse than anybody can possibly imagine.
Speaker 1: I like when we're having these conversations with a a good legal mind, a great legal mind that can parse it and say, I'm seeing this. I'm seeing this. You you know, when we're going through it, these are all facts. It's all documents. And as as I speak, it's like, wow.
It sounds crazy. And I talk to people in government, and they say, when you see the scale of what's China is involved in in North America, you know, you don't have to believe in conspiracy theories. It's a conspiracy. When Pompeo says they're inside the gate, he's the former director of the CIA. He knows.
Right? And so, yeah, this is a deep effort to undermine, The United States, and China is preparing to take Taiwan potentially by force. That's what it's all about. They don't want America to be able to combat that.
Speaker 0: And and they wanna get in America via Canada by infiltrating Canada. What's what's the level first of all, how much time do you have left?
Speaker 1: I got a few more minutes yet.
Speaker 0: What we we might do in two minutes, we might just go we'll go over to locals because we're gonna I'm gonna launch the next person, and then we'll take some questions there. Canadian sorry. Chinese ownership of Canadian real estate is one thing. Chinese ownership in natural resources in Canada is another thing. What's the level of Chinese involvement in Canadian mineral companies?
Speaker 1: Well, this government I mean, the the still liberal government for the past ten years has pretty much turned a blind eye to Chinese investment in mines in the North. There's some very controversial ones that occurred. I know for a fact because, you know, way back when I was a younger reporter in 2017, a state department official took me for a coffee and said, we essentially had to twist Canada's arm on a few of these saying, like, you cannot let that that satellite or that resource company come in here because that is a pure Chinese intelligence play, and, you know, the Trudeau government was letting it happen. You know? Probably, I I don't think they're that stupid.
I think there was corruption going on. You know? Same thing with Huawei. So resources, I don't know the exact footprint, but I know that through, like, shell companies, proxies, land ownership around, you know, resource plays that are around, you know, critical infrastructure, it's going on at scale in Canada from China. And I'll tell you, you know, one a real expert that wrote a book, he came from, you know, a Canadian military intelligence background, worked for the Canadian police and intelligence.
He said, it's not infiltration. It's saturation of China in Canada's infrastructure critical institutions, saturation.
Speaker 0: You've never been on Rogan?
Speaker 1: No. I haven't. I I I would really like to because, you know, I I like these talks, and I would sit there with a nice stout or a or a, you know, a a nice drink for two to three hours. I would do it.
Speaker 0: Okay. I I'm I'm gonna this will be my ask of the chat that's watching. Now there's 27,000 strong on Rumble. Tag Rogan, and and you need to get on Rogan because this is
Speaker 1: This is an attack on America. And I I won't I sometimes I'm modest, sometimes I'm not, but I would say that I'm one of the leading journalists in the world that has the picture on this.
Speaker 0: You you you are the I I've spoken to a bunch, and you have all everyone has said, get Sam Cooper on. He knows this better than anybody. And this allows me I I'm, you know, third grade, but this allows me to piece together even more dots or connect more dots than I already thought I knew. I have indicated the raid in Rumble, people. Head on over.
It's a good thing. We're using StreamYard, so come over to locals if you wanna be part of this. It will not be for members only. Subscribers only. So you can come and ask some questions, but I wanted to get some questions.
Sam, I'll I'll I'll I'll I'll your time for as much as you have left. Yeah. I'll hang around. Alright. So go raid Kim Iverson or come over to vivabarneslaw.locals.com.
We're gonna end this on Rumble right now and remove it. Thank you all for being here. Sunday night show coming up. Sam, holy crab apples. Okay.
Let's see. We're gonna do this here. I don't know how this is gonna work, but I know that there were some questions over here. Hyphen over in in our in our commit locals community says, when my daughter was teaching in Panama, she told me all the shops are Chinese owned. And I I remember Michael Yuan talking about, Chinese communities within South America and explaining it.
I it now I'm putting these things together, I'm not sure if I didn't understand it at the time because I just didn't have enough information. This is part and parcel of control and and seizing control of of of critical assets.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No doubt. Most people, you know, like, they know that New York, they know Vancouver, Toronto have a big Chinatown. But, yeah, Latin America has many deep Chinatowns, and it's unfortunate that a lot of people that, you know, wanted to get away from the communist party, they go to another country, and China sends in, you know, its spies and thugs and finds a level of control. And they let those organized criminals that are running those cash banks, they let them do their activity as long as they're running, you know, communist operations at the same time.
And if I could add, you know, you meant your your your reader or viewer mentioned ownership in Panama shops. Absolutely. They're you know, one of the one of the gangsters in BC that I and the Globe and Mail, you know, the the big Canadian newspaper recently revealed that Justin Trudeau was in a private meeting with this Western Hemisphere Money Launder. He's got I my sources indicate credibly, he's now major investor in bank in Panama after being in Vancouver. So it just shows how the major players, you know, in North American cities are major in Latin America as well.
Speaker 0: This, I presume, is, this is the Western Standard just because it's the first one that came up. Chinese Xinjiang oh, no. That's a it
Speaker 1: just Yeah. No. That's it.
Speaker 0: Crawl Paul, I gotta leave all these windows open so that I can read this. And and I'll start.
Speaker 1: Call King Jin.
Speaker 0: Yep. Okay. Wilde, there's a a question here in our locals community, and it says, from Roosteng, does Sam think or know that Trudeau and his inner circle is seriously compromised and that China has been exploiting them? I think I've I think we've gotten to the answer of that. You know the old this is from Sam.
He says, you know the old saying, never fight a war on multiple fronts. Well, if that's the case, how is it that China is so set on putting pressure seemingly everywhere all at once? Why are they doing this keeping, keep going back to Michael Yon's reporting, pointing out China's reach into social social terraforming and creating a narrative that anyone has historical Chinese lineage? So many global issues seem the, seem the global initiative by China, plus China only has thirty five plus years, until, loose until they lose the bulk of their workforce.
Speaker 1: There's a there's a real reader. I mean, I mean, a lot of points I would agree with, like, so many pressure points. Again, it's about how China has 1,400,000,000 people and major diaspora communities around the world, and they've got the most expansive intelligence foreign intelligence in the world. So they can implant within those communities and through thug thuggishness, implant a level of fear. This is what the Chinese police station story is about, you know, running kinda like off the books consulates on foreign soil, and the community knows that the gangsters in town are working with them.
So there's a level of fear and control, and the viewer sorry. The reader said something about, you know, implanting that narrative that even though you're living in a foreign country, you probably went there for democracy or a better life. In Beijing, they call you a children of the a child of the yellow emperor. Extremely racist ideology, and that's what they're pushing.
Speaker 0: It's amazing. What do you think the about the argument that, you know, this is payback for the opium war? I've heard a lot of people floated that China has a long memory. They're playing, you know, a 4,000 year old culture, war against the country that's, you know, a couple hundred years old and against the people that don't have that that cultural heritage of 4,000 of history. I mean, any any any not truth, any do you lend any credence to that?
Or
Speaker 1: I do. I mean, I do. One of the best quotes I got from willful blindness was from a an extremely intelligent police officer, and they said, what's going on with the fentanyl in Vancouver is the opium war in reverse. And I was like, wow. That is such a great way to put it, but it made sense because, you know, I in my deep dives into Chinese investments, you know, in Canada, you can see that cultural message of the so called, you know, one hundred years of humiliation that followed the British opium wars where they kinda waltzed in with a few soldiers and captured China, and the population, you know, was just so devastated by drugs.
I do feel that the the Beijing, communist narrative that's drilled into young minds is we were humiliated, but now it's time for China to rise. So I do think at an emotional level, it is payback.
Speaker 0: It's wild. Critical thought over in local says, Viva, is this the correct doctor? Doctor Xiang Kuo Xiang Kuo Ki was found to have connections to the w the Wuhan Institute of Virology involved in sending the Ebola virus to China from LEO search.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. That that's her, and you can you can find the picture on my website of her standing beside the notorious Peter Daseck and Ralph Barack in front of the in front of the Wuhan Institute. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Is is the problem with this not that it's I mean, I'm I'm almost on the side of defeatism. Like, the I I appreciate now what Trump is doing, and I appreciate when the absurdity of people saying Trump is is working with China. Now I understand. I believe China released the virus to to frustrate a Trump reelection. Do you think that that's an untenable position?
Speaker 1: Like, I mean, I I can tell you this. I have had face to face with intelligence, again, officer during the pandemic gave me the troubling knowledge that Trump was right. So I lived through that knowing that open source was telling me it very likely came from Wuhan, And I lived with a thought in my mind that could they have purposely done this? And I I I have never heard from anyone in Western intelligence that knows a hell of a lot more than me that says that. They all say it points to a couple of scientists in the lab got sick accidentally, and that's the way it got out.
But what I can say is this, you know, the open source clearly points out that Beijing covered it up and then let its people travel abroad. So in that way, when an accident happens, what are they gonna do? Are they gonna control it or weaponize it? I think there's a good argument that they weaponized it. And so it's interesting now that you have all these western intelligence agencies leaking, you know, reports, and it makes you think at some point, is a government gonna launch just come out and say, okay.
Reparations. You know, we can't say you purposely did this. You had an accident. You coulda stopped it, and now you gotta pay us back.
Speaker 0: I know. It it was, we I I recall us talking about at the time where domestic travel was restricted in China, but not international.
Speaker 1: Exactly. And
Speaker 0: you have who was it? It wasn't Hochul. It was it was Nancy Pelosi, another one who I believe was infiltrated by Chinese spies saying, you know, don't be racist. Go hug a Chinese person.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is bringing it back to Theresa Tam and her arguments or whatever the government of Canada does. It takes me back to time when I was thinking, you know, why are the airports open? Why you know? Right? Like, it's not xenophobic to say, yeah.
Borders are there for a reason. I'm sorry that there's an accident in the other part of the world, but we have to protect ourselves. And the people up there in positions of power in health care in Canada were saying, you're pushing a racist narrative that this, you know, the the even even just saying that, you know, China some accident happened there even if it wasn't in the lab. They were saying, you can't even say that anymore. Right?
So there I do think that that those type of people, they they were either very stupid or very influenced, I think.
Speaker 0: I I'm I'm going with influence because I'm not particularly smart, and I was I was noticing it at the time, and I'm not influenced. I was I was it was in Canada. I remember going to Chinatown. They were holding, like, a Chinese New Year celebration shortly afterwards. I have to refresh my memory on the time frame on this.
And, like, it was not only racist to not you had to celebrate, China while denying the the possibility that it came from a lab in Wuhan, China.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, it was there were things that are said that are kind of insensitive, and there were you know, there some bad things happened, and they we should never accept racism. But I remember my old newspaper, the province, in the early days, wrote China virus, and they got so attacked by the Chinese consulate boss in Vancouver, went on CBC and said that this is so racist. And in my mind, because I I knew very clearly this is kind of like a Chinese information operation to suppress any reporting, you know, whether whether crass or not to link the virus to China. And, you know, what do you know?
Documents later came out that very same Vancouver Consulate Official has been involved in in election interference. So there's media control, election interference, but back to the China virus. Yeah. It was a virus from China, and it was the China virus.
Speaker 0: The the the Carney connection is are are you gonna yeah. We're on we're on Locals, but this is still gonna be for the Internet forever. Are you gonna focus on Carney? Like, I I don't know what your political leanings are, and I don't, you know, I don't really care for the conservatives policy wise much more than the liberals. But I believe Carney is a is is absolutely, corrupted, infiltrated.
And and as much as people think he's not as bad as Trudeau, I actually think he's worse because he was, a, advising Trudeau during Trudeau's premiership, and this guy is the globalist with the connections to all of the Chinese run international organizations. Are you gonna go hard on him in terms
Speaker 1: of Yeah. I mean, I've already done two deep dives. The first one was I had never written a story on the the WEF partly because, you know, there's a lot there's a lot of there's a there's there's a bit of a taint around it, and I was like, I'll get to it because I know it looks like a pretty shady shop. And all these rich people, you know, from they're gonna get up the bad stuff. So I did a deep dive, I found, again, Carney through that entity was connected to the, again, the Asian infrastructure investment bank.
You know, I talked about a, you know, an infrastructure project in Brazil. So quite clearly through the WEF, Kearny was linked to Beijing money, linked to sort of climate change initiatives. And so I did a dive on that, and, you know, I did sort of one of these network charts. And what do you know? I I was able to, in hindsight, predict a couple key players in his administration that I linked to him through the kind of WEF and related entities.
I also did a deep dive into, again, his investments through Brookfield in in China. And as I say, if you're a western business person investing in real estate in China, it's, you're you're as captured as Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor because you're not you're not getting out of that investment without some sort of giveback.
Speaker 0: I I am you know, it's it's I I I'm gonna I'm gonna go hard on on on Carney because it's to me, it's just it's it's black and white, the level of of who he serves by way of policy and by way of interest.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: Did you did I I I did you look into the Tavistock thing with his daughter and the and the the gender clinic in terms of whether or not she attended the gender side of Tavistock and what I was piecing together some timelines there just in terms of him moving to London, fraternizing apparently with Maxine, Jolene Maxwell. The year later, he was, you know, having a dinner with prince Andrew after everything was well done and known. You know, they're all a bunch of, as far as I'm concerned, sick perverts partying among each other. The only question is whether or there's more to that than just a timeline.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I didn't in terms of his his child, I didn't look into it at all. Kinda gave me a little bit of the willies. There could be a story there. I'm just I didn't really look at it.
Let's leave it at that. I I'm more interested in his Beijing connections and his, yeah, his WF connections should be predictive of what he will do in Canada. So that that's enough right there. You know, I don't need to dive quite into the other stuff. I'll look at the big investments and say, who does he work with?
What are his networks? Who will influence him? And, you know, where are his conflicts of interest? How will he serve Canada? And, actually, Jim Belsili said it really well.
You know, as a great Canadian businessperson, nonpartisan I'm nonpartisan. Belsili said, look. Trudeau believes in everything that Carney does, but Carney created what Trudeau believes in. And Carney is just so so efficient that Canada has gone like this for ten years. Kearny will take us there quicker, much quicker.
And I actually do believe look. I'm a Canadian patriot. I think it's a pivotal time. It's hit or miss with this election. I'm not partisan at all, but I've come out and said, we need to change a government now or we you might as well make us the fifty first state because we'll either be the fifty first state, which way better than a province of Beijing, which is what will happen if Carney wins.
A % and a province of, you know, Davos, whatever whatever his interests are will be Canada, not Canada.
Speaker 0: Amazing. There was one other thing I've I forget if I was gonna ask it. I'm gonna put all of your links on the, on the in the in the pinned comments so that people will be able to find you. We we gotta get you on Rogan because this is, I I I see the discussion going the exact same way as the other historians and other other like, this would just blow his mind because I don't think the the people fully appreciate this.
Speaker 1: The way I'm trying to frame it is this is the Cuban missile crisis, except it's much more complex the way America's being surrounded.
Speaker 0: Hyphen says, I told you it came in October 29 via soldiers from Wuhan asked him to confirm. Two planes of Canadian soldiers, they were isolated on the tarmac. Now I from what know, October 20
Speaker 1: I can confirm. I let me tell you this. I have access to a person in the Canadian military that has shared information with the agency, CIA. I know that CSA's Canada's CIA assessed that, yes, Canadian soldiers, not just Canadian, soldiers in Wuhan brought the virus back, but they weren't I don't think they were the first. But, yeah, I can confirm.
Speaker 0: It's amazing. That's hyphen. He's another well well versed member of our community. Sam, can we do this again?
Speaker 1: Let's do it again, and I just like Canadians building the right bridge with Americans because we're we're brothers and cousins, sisters. Like, we can't let this go, and I just love talking to Americans. And Canadians, get America. So yeah. For sure.
Speaker 0: You know what I mean? I I've been telling people that this well, I'm I'm from I'm from, you know, I'm from but, like, I've been telling Canadians that Canada has become a national security threat for America, and, the tariffs are sort of almost not pretextual, but the tariffs were just really sort of a carrot to Trump's stick in terms of making Canadians understand this. And he I always say he just he knows more than what people assume he knows when he makes his statements, which is why they seem so outlandish to people who just don't have the oh, wiretapped and, you know, he knows a lot more than their than they can disclose.
Speaker 1: You mentioned Trudeau, and I do I I'm quite confident that Trump would have awareness of some very concerning activities around Trudeau with regards to China. And I've even reported for the bureau based on sources saying, even within the RCMP, they talked more than once. Why is mister Trudeau meeting with these billionaire gangsters for fundraisers? It's concerning. Concerning.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let's let's do this again. Well, I I will I will not abuse of the favor, but I'll I mean, anytime, we'll do this again.
Speaker 1: No. It was awesome talking. I I mean, I just like we're rolling fast. You get it, and you're going ahead. I love talking like this.
Speaker 0: No. And are my audience is well familiar with it. I'm just I'm not in the depths that you are, but, like, I it's superficial understanding, but now I get to justify the dots that I've been connecting. Stick around. You and I will just say our proper goodbyes.
Locals, I will see you no later than Sunday, but probably this afternoon. And, Sam, we'll talk, and I'm gonna put all your links up in the pinned comment. I'm gonna upload this to YouTube as well as a stand alone, so the world is gonna get this. And I'm gonna go to Twitter afterwards and get Rogan to notice you. Sam, thank you.
Locals, see you soon. Peace out, everybody.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
EXCUSE ME??? Mark Carney is Christia Freeland’s son’s Godfather? WTAF! https://t.co/yCzfbpd6nO
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've known Mark for a long time, we're both from Northern Alberta. I think Mark is a great Canadian, and I'm really glad that he has come out as a Liberal. I'm grateful for any support he can offer our party, our government, and our country. I speak with Mark often, he's actually my son's godfather.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I actually have known Mark for a very long time. Both of us are from Northern Alberta. And I think Mark is a great Canadian. I am really glad that he has come out as a Liberal, and I'm grateful for any support he can offer our party, our government, and our country. I speak with Mark often.
About that? He's I speak with him often. He's actually my, son's godfather.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Missouri Strikes Gold: $24 BILLION Judgment Slaps China for COVID Lies and PPE Hoarding! Live tonight at 18:00 https://t.co/AClcl2eKE2
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Why would Theresa Tam be interested in addressing vaccine hesitancy in December 2019, before Covid even hit? Unless they knew that “Covid” was coming, and the ensuing vaccine campaign. https://t.co/5G6a3EpwWq
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Justin Trudeau's "Liberal" Party is as corrupt as you think. Mark Carney's suspicious donors ignored while they disqualify his primary opponent. Watch and share. https://t.co/a94qftYfTT
Video Transcript AI Summary
These leadership race rules are opaque and internally determined. Everything operates in secrecy. As candidates, we questioned data sciences' affiliation with the Prime Minister and how we could ensure integrity with them controlling the Liberal Party's registered member lists. Questions arose regarding Mr. Carney's donors with foreign addresses. But unless you're favored, these questions go unanswered. As the first woman of color running from a multicultural community for the Liberal Party leadership and potentially Canada's next prime minister, I faced false, fabricated allegations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The leadership races going on, these rules are, like, purely internally determined. Nobody I mean, are they opaque, does anybody even know what they are?
Speaker 1: Well, everything seems to operate in secrecy. And despite our numerous questions as candidates as to why data sciences you know, we all know the affiliation with the ownership of data sciences and the prime minister. You know, many of us questioned how we could have the integrity that the race required if data sciences was actually controlling all of the registered lists of members for the Liberal Party. There were questions in regards to mister Carney's, you know, donors with 21 people having foreign addresses. There were many questions, but unless you're the blue eyed boy, you never ever get asked.
And, obviously, someone, you know, who was making history as the first woman of color, as one of the first women, you know, to run from a multicultural community for the leadership of a Liberal Party and for Canada's next prime minister, they wanted to come out with these false fabricated allegations and violations.
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel frustrated seeing @BernieSanders go from denying he took money from pharma executives to admitting it was $1.5 million out of $200 million. This feels like a clear contradiction, and it’s disappointing to see him labeled a liar with evidence backing it up. His reputation is at stake.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
What does it feel like to be proven liar before all of America @BernieSanders? Within a minute, it went from “I did not take a penny from pharma executives” to “it was only $1.5 million out of $200 million”. Incidentally, you are a liar. You did take money from executives. Here is the evidence, The Internet is forever, as is your tarnished confirmed big-pharma-whore reputation.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Almost all panel members, including you, are accepting significant contributions from the pharmaceutical industry.
I ran for president too and received substantial contributions, but they did not come from executives.
Out of 200 million, I received 1.5 million.
You still haven't answered my last question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Almost all the members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting 1,000,000 of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry. Oh, no. No. No. No.
Their interest.
Speaker 1: Oh, I thought that that would go no. Dun dun. No. I ran for president like you. I got 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of contributions.
They did not come from the executives. They did not come from the executives. They did not come from the executives. They did not come from the executives. 1,500,000.
Yeah. Out of 200,000,000. Alright. But you have not answered. Last question.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Here is a compilation of the videos that are now circulating of the apparent plane crash in Pennsylvania. A lot of people commenting that it looks more like a missile than a plane crash. [edit] the aggregate knowledge of the Interwebs confirming it was indeed a plane. Thank you @Cad_Republican
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Well, it looks like I was right. It looks like the DOJ / court did in fact seal Patel's Grand Jury testimony and that lying SOB @CoryBooker was lying to @Kash_Patel and trying to trick him into violating a court order / DOJ order.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
EPIC! This is Kash Patel’s “mic drop” moment. Klobuchar just got absolutely destroyed, but she’s too stupid to understand. https://t.co/fN1KUQXzM0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Before calling on Senator Lee, I need clarification on whether the FBI headquarters, which investigates cybercrime and terrorism, should be shut down. I deserve an answer.
If the best attacks against me are false accusations, this body undermines the credibility of the FBI. I have served in every theater of war and any claims that I prioritize political bias over the Constitution are unfair. I have the endorsement of over 300,000 law enforcement officers for the FBI director position.
I am quoting his own words, and facts matter. You had three minutes in the next round to address this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before I call on senator Lee Could he just answer the question if he said that the FBI headquarters where they investigate cybercrime and terrorism Mister chair. Shut down and opened as a deep state? Mister chair. At the museum. Did he say that the headquarters should be shut down?
Mister chair. I deserve an answer to that question.
Speaker 1: You don't
Speaker 0: have to go to the head of the FBI Yeah. And he said that their headquarters should be shut down. Mister chair, parliamentary inquiry. You got anything you wanna say, mister Patel, before I go on to Senator Lee?
Speaker 1: Simply this. If the best attacks on me are gonna be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI. I stood with them here in this country. In every theater of war we have, I was on the ground in service of this nation. And any accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the constitution are grotesquely unfair.
And I will have you reminded that I have been endorsed by over 300000 law enforcement officers to become the next director of the FBI. Let's ask them.
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, I am quoting his own words Alone. From his Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Out out of context, you hysterical words.
It is not some You hysterical buffoon. Is what mister Patel actually said himself. Facts matter. You forgot that you had three minutes in the next round to say what you just said. Take it away from her.
Say them again. Okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I had an eye-opening interview with Katie from Universal Ostrich Farm in British Columbia. The Canadian government has mandated that her mother must slaughter over 400 healthy ostriches by February 1, following the alleged positive tests for avian flu in two deceased birds. These ostriches, some weighing up to 300 lbs, have been part of the family for up to 35 years. Katie is expected to dig burial pits on her property for them. I encourage you to watch and form your own opinions on this situation.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
This is an absolute must watch and share. My interview with Katie from Universal Ostrich Farm in British Columbia. The Canadian government, via CFIA - Canadian Food Inspection Agency - has given Katie's mother (owner of the farm) until February 1 to SLAUGHTER over 400 HEALTHY ostriches on her mother's ostrich farm because two deceased ostriches allegedly tested positive (via oral and anal PCR tests) for avian flu. The farm has until February 1 to slaughter over 400 healthy animals (which can weigh up to 300 lbs each and have been in the family for as long and 35 years!), and bury them in multiple pits 9 meters deep, which Katie's is supposed to dig on her own property. I ask all the questions. You can come to your own conclusions and determine if this is the outrage I think it is. If you agree, please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Katie and Carrie discuss the mass culling of 400 ostriches at Universal Ostrich Farms in British Columbia, which is set to occur by February 1st due to alleged avian flu. Katie, the owner's daughter, explains the farm's history and their shift from meat production to focusing on the ostriches' natural immunity. Carrie, the litigation manager, highlights the lack of accountability in the government's actions and the questionable testing methods used to declare the birds infected. They express outrage over the expectation that the family must euthanize their healthy animals and the absurdity of the situation, emphasizing the need for public awareness and legal action to protect the ostriches and challenge government overreach. They encourage support through their website, saveourostriches.com, to help fund their legal battle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now we're going from one aspect of Canadian insanity to another. I've never met either Katie or Carrie before. I've seen some interviews. I've been boning up in as much as I can on the story of, the mass culling of ostriches in British Columbia. And so we've got Katie, who I believe is the daughter of the owner of the farm and Carrie, who I believe is the lawyer representing them.
And they are on, I don't wanna say a ticking time bomb. It's rather a, a ticking clock because there's a very, very hard deadline coming up on, on February 1st from what I understand. If you don't know this story, you're gonna know it as well. I've been catching up. Rebel news has, covered it.
I'm gonna share the link to Rebel news website, where you can, sign the petition or, you know, put pressure on on politicians because this has to stop. I'm gonna bring in Katie, and I'm gonna bring in Carrie, and I'm gonna go on the bottom just like this so that it's symmetrical. Ladies, how does this go, the battle? I I I I'm I'm I'm I know a bit about what's going on in this story, but I think you're gonna need to fill everybody in. And I don't know who the best is gonna be to fill it in.
Katie, you are the daughter of the owners of your parents own the farm?
Speaker 1: My mom and her business partner both, yeah, they own Universal Ostrich Farms, and, we've my mom started Universal Ostrich Farms, Karen Esperson. And, we obviously for as long as I've been alive, well, I I guess, I'm 35 years of my years I've been alive. I've been a part of the ostriches' lives and they've been part of ours.
Speaker 0: The farm where is the farm located? Or where was it located? Because they're my temporary farm right now where they're being where they're being held?
Speaker 1: No. No. They're being held here in their own home captive. They're as safe as can be in their own quarantined area. They have that beautiful pen that, is wildlife fenced.
So that's where they are, and that's where they have been, and they haven't been moved. We are in Edgewood, British Columbia. We're about an hour and a half away from any major city. We live in a small town, Edgewood, which is about, population of 600 people, actually.
Speaker 0: Okay. And this this ostrich farm your has been in the family for a while, was it originally meat farming or what was the purpose of the farm originally?
Speaker 1: So originally my grandfather and my grandmother actually started getting into them and they were in Alberta. And my grandfather, Esper Esperson, was the president of the Alberta Ostrich Association at the time years ago. And, they came in and they were kind of a novelty. Everybody got into these amazing fancy ostriches and they were overpriced at that time and they just were something really cool, but there was no market for them. So farms quickly learned, we have all these really expensive ostriches, but we don't know how to make any money off them.
So, a lot of farms at that time started to just fold and get out of it. And, my mom, when my grandparents got out of it, my mom got into it, and, my mom and dad at the time. And, my mom, so she's just spearheaded and been a pioneer in the industry for over the years. At the beginning, it was about learning them, education on their hatching, creating an industry, and the industry was kind of around meat. So it was gonna be a healthier meat.
It's gonna be healthier for the the planet. They are very lean, red meat, and it was all about that. And then we started to really start to change our focus though and see the amazing abilities that this ostrich has to do really good things for humanity, by just using their just using their eggs. And things that we could do with their amazing natural immune system and their ability to, conquer environmental, challenges that they've that they're faced with. And so that has been the main focus of the Ah farm for the last 3 years is promoting natural immunity.
And really, you know, we're all born with antibodies, and these ostrich have been on the earth for, 21000000 years. It's the latest trutheal fossil found. And so you can imagine that these guys have stayed on this planet, for a long time for a given reason. So that's our main focus now out here is, just the robust immune system.
Speaker 0: Okay. Interesting. And, so so no farming, no human consumption of the meat or eggs any longer?
Speaker 1: No. Correct. Yeah. Very correct.
Speaker 0: And, do you do guided tours? Is it, like, open to the pub there's a there's a there's an ostrich farm, at least there was one, and I think it's still there in Montreal or outside of Montreal when I lived in Quebec. And I don't wanna name it because I don't wanna bring down any federal agents on them. I used to go there I used to go there and get ostrich eggs and ostrich meat. It is it's delicious.
It's like filet mignon but with less fat. The eggs themselves are amazing. But they took people on on tours. They would, you know, it was it was a it was like sort of a petting zoo type farm. Do do you is it open to the public, your your mom's farm?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It has been. And it's probably one of her favorite things to do. And even us, like me, when I'm here and if somebody comes and wants a tour, I would do the tour. It's probably one of the the favorite things to do here is educate people about how fun they are.
The personalities that they have and how they are like our family members. You know, there's young ones that we don't, you know, that that we don't have as we're gaining that connection because they're like a little brother. But, with all the old ones, we have some here that are 34 years old, 33 years old, and we have so many in their twenties. And so it's fun to take people and their kids or people driving by in tourism, show them up close these big beautiful animals that are £300 with the most beautiful big eyes that just look into your soul. And they have personalities, they have hairdos, they are, unique and silly, and they also have a very beautiful pecking order.
And that being said, that's my mom, Karen Esperson, and her business partner. They can go out there, and they've earned their trust over 35 years. We have ostriches that watch out for them because we have bratty teenagers in there. So there's the older ones that will go and they'll protect them and keep those ones away from my mom when she's feeding. And they have this just beautiful thing to show people.
And yes. So it is open to the public. It's one of our favorite things to do is educate.
Speaker 0: I I remember reading, and it's a fact, you'll tell me if it's wrong, that in a fight between an ostrich and a lion, it's 5050 because ostriches can disembowel anybody and anything with one of their with their talon leg kicks, and their legs are just massive tree trunks of muscle and and lethality.
Speaker 1: They are. They kick out and they drag their nail down, and that's their that's their fighting mechanism. So they would punch out, drag down, and they can use that, nail in the wild to disembowel a a lion. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Alright. That's alright. I I don't I don't get to facts.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But they live they live to 75 years old too. So we'll get away from that fact and say these guys have a lot of years left in them and that's what we're fighting for is it's a lot of lives lot of years left.
Speaker 0: You've got 400 of them on the farm?
Speaker 2: Correct.
Speaker 0: Okay. Now I guess this we we bring in Carrie, you're an attorney. Correct?
Speaker 2: No. Actually, and I I wanna make that very, very clear. You know, I get into enough trouble, let alone with the loss aside, please. No. I'm litigation manager for the family and the liaison.
As you can imagine, there's so much information. Right now, the lawyers do not have time to be doing interviews because we're trying to get, into court to get a stay of execution, if you will, with these animals for at least the 30 days so we can get all of our I was gonna say ducks in a row. There's just too many, you know, puns available, you know, run afoul of the lawn, such in this case. But at the end of the day, there is a deadline, and these birds are scheduled to be executed on February 1st. So k.
So I just
Speaker 0: explain how we even got and by the way, my my apologies because I saw I thought I saw litigator, not litigation liaison, but I still would have made the same mistake. So not an attorney, Carrie Simpson, but she stated the holiday you. Is that a probably a good quality to to not have?
Speaker 2: I would agree with you. So how
Speaker 0: does it even how does it come to be? Like, how do you get in trouble? How does it come where they say, you we've gotta we gotta kill them all?
Speaker 2: Well, you know, I I've been watching, the comments here, and, I got a a few minutes of the show that you just did. You know, I think Canadians need to realize there's something very nefarious happening in this nation. And at some point in time and maybe this is it. Maybe it's gonna take the 400 Ostriches to bring to the attention of what's happening between big pharma, the World Health Organization, our political, people being in cahoots, making money off of this, and all the rest of it. So there's a lot of tentacles to this, to this animal.
But in this case, we've been watching the culling of animals, and it's been very strategic over the years. So back in 2012 in Ontario, for instance, there was a herd of sharp sharp chi, sheep. And, the Canadian Food Industry Agency. So they're the ones that have their own special act. They have a president.
They are under our Minister of Agriculture. So there's two pieces of legislation that are very paramount in this. The CFIA Act and the Animal Health Act. They've been, you know, culling animals for no reason for a long time. You know, there seems to be this stamping out mentality.
So in the case of the sheep, they there was concern over scabies. And, of course, the only way you could test for scabies is to kill the animal in the post mortem test. So once they had a kill order, a group called the Animal Peace Corp, if I recall correctly, kidnapped the sheep and, put them in hiding. Regrettably, it wasn't too long before those hidden sheep were found and killed, and they were found not to have not one of them had scrapes. But the people who kidnapped the sheep, were then charged under this act, the Canadian Food Inspection Act.
Because if you get in, in the way of these agents, you can be charged with conspiracy, for instance, to defraud a public service, obstruction of a CFI agent. So there's a lot of power here without a lot of accountability. And, you know, that power without accountability is a very dangerous, component to any nation, especially Canadians who value freedom and liberty. And, you know, the government overreach can only go so far. And we've seen this tendency, whether it was through the COVID situation, this situation, and in a lot of other situations, you know, where my interest was this is last year I wrote a report on premise identity.
So many provinces have now moved and created laws that every animal with livestock, meat protein, specifically, has to be registered and accounted for. So those people with 4 chickens in their backyard in the city, they must now register those animals. This the government wants to know every animal that you could possibly eat and where it's located. In Alberta, they're assigning units, so they're limiting people on what they can have. So this whole control mechanism that we see very well, you know, directed through the 2030 agenda is coming very much to fruition here.
So this is part of that. It is the psychological conditioning of create fear over the avian flu, kill all the animals to show people how dangerous it is when in fact, you know, avian flu has been here from for for a very long time. And yet, killing healthy animals, I would hope we are advanced enough as a society now to know that there are other mechanisms available to test healthy animals and save them from being executed in this fashion.
Speaker 0: Well and also just to state the obvious, ostriches are flightless birds. So it's not exactly like they're migratory birds that are gonna go infect other flocks or infect other other you call them herds of birds.
Speaker 2: Can I just can I just address that? Because that's one of the key things here. We have the opportunity to have a living laboratory right at the mitts for the whole globe to watch. These birds are not, contagious as far as being close to other commercial poultry. They're isolated in this little place called Edgewood, BC.
We have statistical and scientific background already on these animals. We have DNA from them. We know them. We can study immunity here. We can learn.
I mean, everybody knows by now vaccinations are not the way forward. They don't work. If they do work, they only work for a certain amount of time. Why aren't we taking this opportunity if we really care about people health, animal health, the health of nations, you know, or do we care about making big pharma rich, politicians rich, their their stakeholders rich? What what is really our motive here?
Because if our motive is global health and well-being, then this is a perfect opportunity to study whether or not natural immunity has a future. Can we contain those antigens? Can we isolate them and pass them on to younger birds to see whether or not they build natural immunity through that? There's so much opportunity here to do something good. And this government is saying, we don't want that to happen.
We want to silence these people. We want to break these people. We want to kill this experiment, meaning the execution of these 400 now healthy birds. Let me let me emphasize. The birds, the population there, we haven't had any deaths.
There is a healthy population there now.
Speaker 0: Well, let's back it up all the way to the beginning. How do you guys even get on the radar for, this government intervention? Do they what I from what I understand, 2 ostriches did die a while back. I don't know how long ago when they were infected or is that wrong?
Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah. So that's correct. I will go back to, this all started mid December, but we're gonna back up. I'm gonna go quickly to 2020.
2020, we had we had some illnesses here and symptomatic. And as everybody knows, as farmers in the industry, we will all go through some, you know, different things through our herds. And it wasn't alarming though this time because in 2020, we had symptomatic symptoms. We reached out to our vet. Our vet wired away, said, okay.
Let's do some tissue samples. We got some tissue samples off to him immediately because at that same time, we had some deaths in 2020. And And then
Speaker 0: deaths deaths of ostriches, not deaths of people.
Speaker 1: No. No. Sorry. Yeah. Let's be very clear.
Deaths of the ostrich, mortalities in the animal.
Speaker 0: Now I just wanna I wanna understand, avian this is avian flu back in 2020 in in a couple of ostrich
Speaker 1: No. No. Not at all. So I'm gonna get to that. So 2020, we take the tissue sample.
Tissue sample goes off to our vet, comes back to us as positive for pseudomonas, which is a back at bacteria, not avian flu. So we started we're like, how do we how did we get that? And the vet was like, I mean, it could live in the soil. It could come off a tourist hand, and it could've went got to the birds. So we at that time, we started doing some of our own treatments.
Our flock of herd, they started to gain gain an immunity to whatever was going on. We didn't lose any more, ostriches, and they got healthy. They were fine. Speed up now to 2024, December, mid December. And now my mom, Karen Esperson, and at the farm here, they're we're like, these are the same symptoms.
Uh-oh. Like, we're now where these symptoms are just like we had in 2020. Let's call our vet. And and we did start to have some mortality through our ostriches, in mid December. And so, but we did notice that these symptoms were a little bit more aggressive for sure.
So we called our vet, did our due diligence. Through the holidays, we had to leave a message. We were waiting for him to get back to us. And on the 28th, an anonymous tip goes in supposedly to CFIA. CFIA calls and says we have an anonymous tip that you guys have, you there's somebody's sure you have avian flu.
And then so we start explaining the symptoms to CFIA and say and said, like, okay. But these are the symptoms. Now we have had a bun we've had some that are symptomatic, but they are get they're better now. So and then CFIA said, absolutely. This does not sound like avian flu because if animals get avian flu, they die pretty quickly.
They succumb to their to their, you know, to the illness. So can you mind if we just come out when you have a couple fresh samples? If you have a couple more mortalities, can you, you know, can we come out and do some samples? And my mom, absolutely. We, you know, we oh, yeah.
Please. Let's see what this is and because we wanna contain it. At that time, we'd already started our own protocols. I wanna be clear. We're a farm with a lot of history and our, knowledge.
So we already start, you know, any ones that are kinda not feel feeling well, we start moving them into their own area, take care of them. CFIA, we call CFIA when we had 2 new samples. So these are 2 new. We had mortality before that, like, in that time frame. So I'm gonna be very clear.
We have had more deaths than 2. Some people are saying that there's some confusion there. So I wanna clear that up. The CFIA took samples off 2 deceased.
Speaker 0: So we go I gotta ask it. How many how many died?
Speaker 1: In total, and I wanna make like, so we we're we're almost 500 at that time. Right? 400 and so 80 something. We've had 69 in total symptomatic to this virus, have succumb to their illness. But painting a picture of your large, poultry farm and stuff, you can have, like there could be a mink that comes in and takes 60 out in a night.
Right? So this is a large animal, so it sounds maybe a little bit, I don't know, larger, but it's 69 have succumb to this illness. But there's also over 35 that have been treated by my mom and have gotten they're absolutely would not even know that they're sick, that they've been sick. So back
Speaker 0: The 69 that died what it what was it confirmed as the avian flu, or was it still as of yet undetermined?
Speaker 2: Well, no. No. We're gonna
Speaker 1: go there. Yeah. I was gonna get there. So they took the samples off these 2 ostrich that had laid there for 16 hours waiting for them. They came.
They took PCR tests on each dead carcass. They took it orally, and they took a rectal. They they and at the same time, this is very important. We asked, can we get some of those samples done on our healthy birds? The ones that are alive still.
And they said no. That's not possible. So they leave, and we are about an hour and a half away from a city, so I wanna paint that picture too. They leave here at about 3 o'clock in the afternoon. They have to drive an hour and a half back to Vernon.
At 2 o'clock, they said that we'll find out within 24 to 36 hours. The next day by 2 o'clock, we got a call from the Abbotsford Lab, which is, I would say about 6 hours away from here, 7 hours away from where we are. 2 o'clock in the afternoon, the next day we get a call saying we tested positive off those PCR tests for h five n one, and we are to be we are now under quarantine, and we are to be all depopulated. Every animal on this property is to be killed.
Speaker 0: Okay. Depopulated is cult?
Speaker 1: Killed. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. And now and and and I'm like, the the number, it it's a bit it's just sounds like it's a big number, but I mean, I've never been on a farm. Animals get sick. There's like, when kids in in daycare get sick, I mean, poo poo kids don't die from a cold, but animals and birds get colds just like any other animal, and it spreads among among farm animal.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. Yeah. And so I wanna another really important thing to show tell people and paint the picture in people's heads of our farm. There's a huge area of, of our ostrich. And we have in one section, big section, a big field is all of our older birds.
Now all of our older ostrich are 2,020 older. And then in one side of our farm, it's the younger guys because they don't have as much strength to fight the big guys, and we kinda give them a little bit of time to grow up and be able to handle those punches and kicks and fights to for pecking order. So it was very strange enough. Not one ostrich that has been here before 2020 has been symptomatic. Not one death of over 300 and something of our elder birds, which would raise the a concern the alarm, not a concern, it's the alarm of, oh my god.
This is fascinating. These animals have obviously gained a herd immunity years ago to something that they're being exposed to now. And so our younger population, 2020 and younger, are the ones that we have really had those, has have had the symptoms with. But those those ones now have hit their immunity. So we have no more deaths sim to symptomatically.
There's no more deaths with our younger ones. They have hit their herd immunity, natural immunity. And when they took those two tests, those PCR tests, at no time and at no time through this have they taken tissue samples. They've taken no other samples. They came here in my eyes.
They came and took off 2 dead animals, so there's no risk of them staying alive. They took tests, and they left here with something that they and they tested for something exactly what they wanted to find. And they went
Speaker 0: So 69 died. Did they only take tests from 2?
Speaker 1: 2 dead ones. Not
Speaker 0: even the 2
Speaker 1: dead ones.
Speaker 2: And more importantly more importantly, the gold standard of this kind of test would be to take tissue samples. Like, why didn't they take these dead birds and conduct an autopsy? Like, only 2 birds and this, you know, amateur test of swabbing the throat and the rectal area and then putting it through a PCR test, which for most of our research now says they're not to be used as diagnostic testing. More than that, for avian flu, all tests are supposed to then go to the lab in Manitoba, which is run by the World Health Organization for animal health. I know shocking probably to you and your audience, for confirmation.
And we have no evidence whatsoever that that's been done.
Speaker 0: So, let me and it it's not the case that they tested other birds and they did not show positive for avian flu. So they they only they tested 2 and only 2 anal and mouth swabs of a deceased animal with a PCR test, conclude avian flu, pursuant to which now you have to slaughter the other 400 and change who are still alive.
Speaker 2: Exactly. And then and
Speaker 1: then really important too is, like, these animals are you know, we've asked continuously. We said, can we please just get one of a reputable vet, approved vet, can we get them to come and take a blood sample? Take a sample ourselves so we know for future, say, what we're dealing with. And we, we just actually talked just talked, which was scary enough. We just talked to Yvette, and she was like, absolutely.
I would come down and do this for you so we could then approach CFIA. Before we were able to even approach CFIA, she got a call saying not one sample will leave that farm. We got an email on a Saturday from the government saying highlighting that if one test or any treatment or testing is is performed over there, that we are subject to $200,000 fine and 6 months in jail.
Speaker 2: So it's it's which I'd say at this point too, there is a team of researchers, of immunologists at UBC that has come together. We've been just so amazed, grateful, and overwhelmed with the amount of support from experts in the fields of immunology, testing animals, the vets. Everybody's willing to help. Everybody's willing to how do you want us to transport the samples? You know?
We'll we'll follow your protocols. Just let our labs you know? And you can imagine the labs at UBC probably know the protocols for, you know, containing pathogens. Right? And yet, the agents the agents for CFIA say not one sample.
And there's no appeal. There's no appeal
Speaker 0: for So this is this is a purely administrative procedure right now. There there is no you're you're trying to get a court in involved to enjoin the order of the CFIA. CFIA, it's the Canadian food and, inspection. Inspections. It's like the the Canada's FDA.
Yeah. Is it well, I guess it's sort of maybe like the FDA or USDA. It's it's okay. There's no court proceedings other than your petition now to have this order in joint. So CFIA comes in, they issue an order, they say, slaughter them all by February 1st.
Speaker 2: Okay. No. There's there's 1 there's a few more curious well, the one more curious caveat in this. So there is the ability to have your form declared a distinct unit. So that application was made, and and Katie will tell you about what that form's like.
And on January 2nd, the family got basically a you your birds have valuable genetics. So either they're they're valuable genetics or and I forget what the other specialty breed or something. So valuable genetics here because we have science at play, like, literally, a living laboratory. So they said, yes. You're valuable genetics.
So everybody kinda went, oh, good. Okay. 6 days later to was it no. 8 days later, they get another letter saying, no. You are you do not qualify for valuable genetics.
So we're not sure what happened within that 8 day period, but we'll find out. But suddenly, these birds are now, you know, bring on the execution and no appeal.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's really important to know. So we were given, so it's called, an exemption package. So we could fill out an exemption package, a unit one exemption package. So we could fill out these forms and we could, you know, throw in a Hail Mary and hope that this is this these forms will make our birds exempt.
When we, received the unit one exemption package, each question in there is for commercial poultry farms. And so and it lists in there ducks, turkeys, geese, and chickens. And my mom we're reading all the questions, and we're my mom was like, I can't answer any of these questions, honestly. Like, I can't none of these pertain to what we do, who we are, what the what animal they are. And so my mom, we got a hold of the case worker, both of us were there, and, the case worker said, you if you don't fill out this package, you're automatically denied.
You will you do you're you're in noncompliance, and they will they have to you you're, not gonna be given, any exemption. So then my mom said, why? I can't answer yes to all a lot of these are gonna be no because they don't pertain. So she said, I'm telling you right now, this is one of the most important steps. If you do not fill this out, you are you do not qualify for exemption.
So my mom, we together, we're reading through it and going, no. No. No. And, had a few a couple days later later, January 10th, we get a notice. You sorry.
You failed to complete. You failed to meet any of the quest the the standards and the or the questions. And, you are set to be called February 1st. And
Speaker 2: in there too,
Speaker 1: it says right underneath, it says, this is not subject to appeal. So they take away our rights to even have question that. At then then right below that, sickly enough, they send us a mental health link and say we're going to need it. And then yeah. Like, that's a whole new one.
Speaker 2: I I know.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I just wanna ask the how do you even how do you euthanize a, an animal?
Speaker 1: So this is even it's just more. Sorry. This is more sick. You know, they expect that these healthy animals out there now that my mom, Karen, and her business partner, Dave, they're supposed to go out there and humanely look each one in their big beautiful eyes that they've some of them that they've had for 34 years, 35 years, and they're supposed to kill them by their own hands. So they expected them to go out there, do their dirty work, kill 400 of them by their own hands, and dis and dispose of them, by themselves by February 1st.
So they gave them the regulations of where they how they want the pits dug. So we they by regulation, they want a a pit dug 9 meters deep. They want it, 60 meters away from the next pit. You're allowed 2 and a half tons of ostrich or animal per pit, and you so they are expecting, that works out to 40 pits with, you know, 10 ostriches each, 60 meters apart, and they want them all buried in our hay back in our hay land. They're not they haven't asked us where there's any wells, where there's any, springs.
There's natural springs back there. So they're so worried about this avian flu, but they're okay with us putting supposedly 400 such unhealthy animals that they came in hazmat suits in back in our hay fields that all that soil can get leached, you know, leaked anywhere. And we have grizzlies, we have cougars out here, we have those are some of our environmental battles with our animals. We have so they're gonna dig these up. So where are we making any sense at all here?
They come in their hazmat suits, and they're okay with us just us disposing of them and trusting us that they're just going in these pits.
Speaker 0: K. I I I have to I mean, I have to ask, not morbid curiosity, logistically. Are are you supposed to shoot them with a shotgun? Are you supposed to cut their heads off? And I and I'm not trying to Yeah.
So It's not chicken.
Speaker 1: No. However, they would they don't know. They don't know, and I'm gonna be honest, we don't know. Biggest question to the world is how do you go out there to your 400 cattle, your 400 goats, your 400 sheep, and you look at them and they're eating normal and they're acting normal, They're being normal. And off 2 tests, you're supposed to go out there by yourself and you're supposed to kill them.
There's no humane way to kill 400 healthy animals. So gun, splitting the boats, like, there's yeah.
Speaker 0: And you're supposed to then get in an excavator and dig up 9 meters deep, 40 different pits, or how many how many pits would it be?
Speaker 1: It would be 40?
Speaker 0: 40 different pits to, bury the carcasses of 400 ostriches 9 meters deep. And I presume what level of topsoil must there be? I mean, they they they can't let you have a a foot of topsoil. How how many how many meters of topsoil?
Speaker 1: I think it's 2 meters.
Speaker 0: Make you slaughter your own animals, which Yeah. And it's it's not it's not done the way a vet euthanizes a dog with with a barbedle injection. This there's only a couple of ways to to take, to kill an animal the size of an ostrich that doesn't, you know So it's actually And then they want you to dispose of the 400 bodies.
Speaker 1: So it's really important. You don't they don't know the ostrich. So let me just put out there, a, you can't walk in there with them. They're extremely dangerous as you stated about the lion. They have to know you.
Like so there's, b, a gunshot goes off. We're gonna have ostriches hit caught in fences. Like, they are a very nervous animal too. And if either out, there's something's happening. They have a 6th sense.
They know when something's happening. They're a smart animal. Doesn't matter, you know, every animal knows in their heart when things aren't right. And, those, when we're supposed to so really, really sick story, you know, is there was a CTV journal, journalism done not that long ago in November, and it's been since taken down since I mentioned it to CFIA. And I have the screenshots of it that it's a very good read and everybody should read it.
Inside Canada's Chaotic Response to the Avian Flu. Now in that article, they very they they've, do interview on a family and, to it's and it's been public, so I'm sure I can say it's a Sheely family. And these poor people had an exotic bird farm, and they came in and said, you have avian bird flu. I don't know exactly how that got laid out, but they had it. They give them 2 options.
1, you're gonna watch your birds die a horrible death. They paint this picture, and you do not get compensated. 2, you walk away. You let us bring in a 3rd party contractor killer. We will take we will kill them all for you, and you will walk away with compensation.
So this family, nicely, they want this little family, like a whole wholehearted family, little farm like us, walk away from their animals that they've loved for their pets. And they came home to blood up the walls, blood all over the ground, heads of their exotic birds left behind. Some of their birds not even fully dead. And, they they, it was traumatizing for this family. And I explained that.
I said, I'm reading things like this, I said to CFIA, because they said to us, if we don't kill them ourselves, they're going to bring a third party contractor in here to kill all of our animals for us. And I said, how do we have any trust in you? Like, look at these articles. Look at this. And 3 hours later, that article was not to be found.
Speaker 0: It it is, it's the most if it's it's beyond inhumane. Now I and I'll and I'm just trying to steel man things here. The the concern is even though they're not even though they're flightless birds, other migratory birds can come through through and pick up their feces and whatever so they can spread it that way.
Speaker 2: But that's a good you raise a good point. I see. That's a good Yeah. When when the agents came out from CFIA, again, if they were really interested in finding out the science behind how are birds getting infected and such, why didn't they take samples from the water? Why didn't they take samples from the feces left over from the wild ducks?
Speaker 0: Why didn't
Speaker 2: they test the
Speaker 0: Just to highlight the absurdity, because if that is the concern, to make you put these carcasses in pits where they will get dug up, they will it will go go elsewhere, doesn't resolve the problem if they are in fact contaminated to begin with. You're you're currently not open to the public not doing tours right now, obviously?
Speaker 1: No. No. So we take we take our protocols very serious. I want that, like, out to the public. If there was something here, we'd the last thing we want is to be any make anybody unsafe.
But 2, they are their their tests and so when we when the symptoms came to the farm, it was due to 5 100 3 to 500 mallard ducks because of our abnormally large, warm winter. They they landed in the pens, and they started going and eating out of their buckets, and eating out of their feed buckets, and then pooping in their feed buckets. And so the ostriches, the young ones who didn't have that immunity, they were starting to get sick. When CFIA was here in our kitchen, they came up to our house and, you know, had a visit at our kitchen table. They said I said, what are we doing about the mallard ducks that are gonna fly away?
The migratory risk of these animals that are just going to the next farm and the next farm and the next farm. Killing our 400 is not gonna solve this problem. And they said, nothing. That's wildlife. This is absurd.
What would you do? Go kill every migratory bird in the world?
Speaker 2: Well, they're And I said Right? So
Speaker 0: that's that's what the website say to do. Like, you gotta kill it, call them. You gotta quarantine off the entire area. Any migratory birds trap and kill them. I'm just looking up in in in real time.
This is what it's
Speaker 1: So then we offered. We said, hey. Like, don't we need to try to stabilize the migratory risk of the flight of the migratory birds and their may major flight paths? And anyways, they're trying in my view, they're stamping out natural immunity. They're not they have a stamping out policy, and that's what they call 1 is sick.
They're all dead. So they're and they're not stamping and are not stamping out a virus. They're stamping out natural immunity, and we need to be really afraid because now Carrie can go into, like, that's the next 400 cows down the road. That's your 400 goats. That's your 400 sheep.
And this is where we stand together, and we come together and say it stops here. These 400 ostriches are just standing up for a way better, bigger cause. And that is they're saying, if you're not gonna let us do independent testing to prove it wasn't pseudonymous again, like, then you know what? They're coming this is a bigger agenda. $590,000,000 got allotted to Moderna for you to roll up your sleeve and take another bird flu vaccine.
They're they're afraid that we're actually we they've now that they've said that we are so, at risk with avian flu, but our ostriches are all getting better and healthy, That goes against everything they're trying to make, put fear out there in the world.
Speaker 0: Well, I honestly, the our priest says, you know, it seems like it's less about health, more about bankrupting a farm. No. To me, it's like, it's about, it's about creating the terror that they created in the early days of COVID and say, look how there's one confirmed case in all of Canada, a British columb was it a British Columbia kid? Yep. One confirmed case of h5n1, a teenager in British Columbia.
1.
Speaker 2: Who had no who had no link to any poultry farm or anything. So they're
Speaker 0: So they want they want and and to slaughter 400 ostriches, not not for meat, not for not I mean, that that wouldn't be any easier, but at least it it goes to sustenance, is is horrifying. They can say, look how serious this is with we're we're we're we're making progress. We got that one kid with with 851 and whatever. Now we get to slaughter all these chickens at the at the drop of a, of a hat. So you petition the courts now.
You I guess there's an emergency injunction or a provisional injunction?
Speaker 2: We're hoping to get into court this week. Of course, you know, it it was a very much a challenge to find lawyers because nobody has really challenged this to the max. And and I I put a legal team together on this. I want this legislation governing this kind of tyranny and abuse of not only animals but of people to be brought into check. I mean, we and we all need animal health regulations, but they must be fair.
People must have confidence. We you know, this is what's happening now. Anybody with, dead poultry will not be calling or going to their vet. I Well, that
Speaker 0: was that was that was my question. It's like, first of all, I don't even know, like, I don't own a farm. If a dog dies, you obviously I don't even know if I wanna find out why the dog died. I would just cremate it and keep its ashes or his ashes. Yeah.
Like, if if a chicken dies, if a ostrich dies I mean, I guess from a responsible perspective, you go and you find out what it was to make sure it's not contagious, but true. Who the hell in their right mind is going to get I've always said it. The second you get any of the authorities involved, they get their closet and they are the proverbial blob, and they'll they'll eat everything.
Speaker 1: So the latest the the latest from them and the world needs to hear is they just came out a couple days ago, and they did, or on, Thursday or Friday. I think it was Friday. Sorry. And they came into protocol check. Well, no problem.
We're happy to show you our very stringent protocols and how it fall
Speaker 2: quickly. They first had they first had a they were coming 2 days before this visit. So bless all the people who are concerned. There was a nice little reception committee there waiting. You know, video record, you know, is essential in this.
So they didn't show up. Instead, they they they rescheduled, and they said, well, we'll let you know the morning of when we're coming out to visit. Now remember, they have all power. They can go in. They can do whatever.
So this time, though, they notified the RCMP because they feared for their safety. Fortunately
Speaker 1: brought to their attention that there was demonstrators, and they were afraid for their safety. This cute little 20 20 people holding out signs with a coffee smiling and brought 2 RCMP cruisers.
Speaker 0: The the the the abusers pretending to be the victims. It's like as they're as they're abusing you, the oh, it's it's like the it's like the judges. Well, we're getting we're getting threats online, so we need to, you know, put a gag order on the proceedings. No. First of all, the world needs to know what's going on.
And if they express themselves peacefully, in opposition to this wholesale slaughter, damn right you're gonna meet some unhappy people.
Speaker 1: So when they came out a couple days ago, they they made us very aware that come February this is this is a new level. Come February 1st, they wanted us to be very clear. They are allowed to come through our our our personal residence, and they're allowed to take any byproduct or any, in quotations, thing that they want out of our home to do with ostriches. So we better not we better not get in the way, and we better stand down. And they are coming through our house to take everything out of here.
And they asked us, where do we if we were working on healthy and natural immunity, and we had these awesome antibodies that would could help other animals naturally, where would those be? And they so they actually asked us where they could find the COVID 19 antibodies that are natural. Like, I like, are you kidding me? So a, you have authority to go through our personal residence. Strip us of anything that has been our livelihood and our passion for over 30, like, 35 years and take my mom is afraid of just her painted eggs.
My mom is like because she asked them. She said, do you mean, like, you could take my painted eggs that I've had people paint over 35 years? And they said, you bet.
Speaker 0: It's it's like it's like the the the peanut and, oh, I forget the raccoon's name. I think it was Fred, of New York State. No. It's it's it's like it's like you have there is no private property. They all they can do is manufacture a pretext, and they can seize and and and do whatever the hell they want with everything you own for your own safety.
Yeah. What is what you found a lawyer? Are you are you like, you've gotta get to court and get an injunction between now February 1st?
Speaker 2: Right. So I can tell you. So I I received a a lot of emails saying, Carrie, you need to help this family. You need to help this family. And, I I kind of looked at the facts and stuff and said, you know, these 400 ostriches deserve to be saved.
This is just outrageous what's going here. So, fortunately, my rolodex is full of some very good lawyers, and I have to say, in my it it it took a day and a half of contacting everybody possible. But you know what? I've never seen anybody like it. All these top legal firms, they said, Carrie, we don't have any experience because nobody's ever really, really challenged in a meaningful way with the funds necessary.
And and, you know, please, people, if everybody chips in, the the legal cost for stopping this insanity is well worth the investment for everybody. This is about our freedom, our liberty on on so many fronts. But even these big firms, they send out internal emails within their their firms asking anybody and everybody to do it. And then, I finally found, somebody who I think is just going to be, you know, a a godsend in this case. And, he says, actually, I I am familiar with that act.
I'm fighting it on compensation for another one, and he says, I get it. So he's put a legal team together. I've had now lawyers involved with maybe, charter challenges, you know, on this because there's some some openings there. So I think we are going to, use this opportunity to to hopefully do a lot of good and set some important precedents and, most importantly, save those 400 beautiful healthy birds, you guys. Avian flu kills everybody within 14 days after exposure.
These birds are not dying.
Speaker 0: Is there do you have a give, send, go, campaign?
Speaker 2: We have. You can go to save our ostriches. So just think s o o, save our ostriches.com. And all the information. Etransfers are the best because we don't get dinged any any, you know, points for their cut.
So there's etransfer information there. That's where you'll find the updates. There is also an email, and we will be putting out information. I will make sure that the minute we have the court date set, which we believe will be this week, I'll let you know for sure, and I'll put you for you and and just your wonderful audience, on our list to make sure that those updates are are given. So save our ostriches.com.
Speaker 0: It's the website here that that I'm looking at right now. Right?
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 2: So that'll take you directly to informations. And that's it.
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I didn't wake up angry, but I probably will be going to bed angry. I'm gonna share that link with everybody, and, we'll keep doing what we can do.
Speaker 2: And you know what? It's a righteous anger. And, you know, I tell Canadians because they're so conditioned to be nice and and peacemakers. They're we are in a time now where Canadians have the right to be righteously angry. And I and I use righteous in there, because what's happening to this nation, what's happening to every person, is not what it is to live in a free and sovereign democratic nation.
And this issue, whether it's 400 ostriches or, you know, the the coercion and manipulation that happened with getting Canadians to inject an experimental concoction into their arms. And I can give other example other example exam at some point, we as Canadians must come together as the people and say enough is enough. We're gonna have an election. You guys don't elect a politician. Elect a leader.
Tell them what you want them to do and ask them how they are going to do it. We have to change the relationship here on so many fronts. But we are working hard to save 400 beautiful souls.
Speaker 1: These I keep saying the world the world is watching. This is honestly the world is watching what's gonna happen here because then that opens the door to Pandora's box. It's the next door. It's the next door. It's the next door.
So this is
Speaker 0: My my reaction I mean, define f them, and if they wanna come and first first of all, exhaust all legal remedies when they they're gonna make you kill animals? Come come good luck. See what see what an ostrich does. And like you say, they're jittery animals. Like, they they they move like like like, what are those
Speaker 1: They run 65 miles an hour.
Speaker 0: So they they work? I can't I could watch. I defer to your your better experiences whether or not they're intelligent whenever I've met them. I don't know if they're intelligent, but they're beautiful. They I'm gonna show a video afterwards.
They're amazing and marvels of nature. But, yeah, good. It's it's it is, human abuse to even suggest to an owner that they have to go slaughter $400 of this.
Speaker 2: Cruel and unusual treatment for them, what what they are putting this family through right now and to put to them the responsibility of killing family members because I think anyone who who knows this family and the interaction that they have with these family members that have been part of their lives for, you know, some 34 years. Hey, Katie. Yeah. Is We raised them as a whole. Crueler.
I can't think of any crueler abuse, and they know it. Otherwise, why would they give them a link to mental health aid? Like
Speaker 0: It's it's it's it's setting it up. They want h one h five n one to be the next, COVID, and this is how they have to start. You know, the the
Speaker 2: the gonna
Speaker 1: be. We're gonna stop it here. It's not gonna be. This isn't gonna be another pandemic because we're gonna stop it as the people. We can show that natural immunity can win, and we're gonna protect our farmers.
Speaker 2: And our people as a result.
Speaker 1: And our people and our people. Sorry. Yeah. I'm animal. I'm just like I'm like, I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: Don't worry. I'm gonna put up the links again when this is over, but, Carrie, Katie, thank you very much. We'll be in touch, and I'll be following it. And if there's anything, you've got my number, both of you. So, we'll we'll be in touch.
Speaker 2: Thanks so much, and thanks to your audience. They look like a well informed, great group of people that, are gonna make the difference here. So together, we will do this.
Speaker 0: We will definitely put it on blast, and everybody can snip and clip and share segments. I I know one segment in particular, which, I'll be I'll be posting later.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Thanks, Penny. Thanks. Have a good day. Bye.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna segue, briefly with this well, a little a little palate cleanse. Where was our visit to the ostrich farm here? This was me back in, younger days. Oh my gosh. That Well, that was after it bit me, actually.
It bit the there Did you do that? That's in emu. That's Why? Oh, okay. We gotta go.
We're out of here. No.
Speaker 1: He's sleeping without us.
Speaker 0: I think that was a See you later, man. That's an ostrich. Oh, yeah. Look at that. Oh my god.
That thing could do the exact would disembowel it it if it was given the opportunity. What do you have to say? Oh my gosh. I got
Speaker 1: to take these jerks.
Speaker 0: Alright. That, by the way, it didn't like my breath and, when it shook its head, fluid came out of its mouth into my face. That was years ago, people. Don't test me for avian flu. It it it atrocious.
It's atrocious.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Link to farm website: https://www.universalostrich.ca/
Universal Ostrich Farms Omega Ostrich | Ostrich Meat and Oil | Canada
Universal Ostrich Farms Inc. and Omega Ostrich Inc. Ostrich farming in North America, Ostrich Oil and red meat.
universalostrich.ca
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
FUCK THESE PROPAGANDIST PIECES OF SHIT! Yes, I'm talking to you @CTVNews. Fuck you.
@CTVNews - CTV News
Elon Musk’s hand gesture during Trump inauguration festivities draws scrutiny https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/article/elon-musks-hand-gesture-during-trump-inauguration-festivities-draws-scrutiny/?cid=sm%3Atrueanthem%3Actvnews%3Atwittermanualpost&taid=678eedf56b0d1c0001627f4c&utm_campaign=trueAnthem%3A+New+Content+%28Feed%29&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
Elon Musk’s hand gesture during Trump inauguration festivities draws scrutiny
Billionaire Elon Musk’s hand gesture while he spoke during a celebration of President Donald Trump’s inauguration drew online comparisons to a Nazi salute on Monday, but a leading tracker of antisemitism said it appeared to represent a moment of enthusiasm instead.
ctvnews.ca
reSee.it AI Summary
The recently released Jack Smith report raises serious concerns. It reveals that prosecutors considered but ultimately chose not to charge Trump under the "insurrection act," suggesting that the impeachment effort was based on something they deemed unchargeable. Additionally, the report references a Colorado decision that was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court, which undermines its credibility. I believe Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, and the Biden administration are engaging in serious misconduct.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
You want to know what a dirty “legal wrap-up smear” the freshly-released Jack Smith report is? The report admits they contemplated but DECLINED charging Trump with a violation of the “insurrection act”. Which means they tried to impeach Trump for something prosecutors decided he could not be charged with. Worse still, the report claims “Courts have found or described the attack on the capital as an insurrection”. Citing the Colorado decision (!!!) which was UNANIMOUSLY overturned by the Supreme Court. Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, and the entire Biden administration are criminals of the highest order.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Link https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Link https://www.justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm sorry for your loss, Los Angeles. But the Sacramento Delta smelt needed freshwater, Ukraine needed firefighting equipment, and you needed your first LGBTQ+ fire chief. She's addressing sexist and racist behavior within the fire department, so don't worry, she's "getting it done."
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Gavin Newsom is very sorry for your loss, Los Angeles. But the Sacramento Delta smelt needed your freshwater. Ukraine needed your firefighting equipment. And you needed your “first LGBTQ+ fire chief”. But don’t worry, she’s “getting it done” by focusing on “sexist and racist behavior within the Los Angeles fire department”.
reSee.it AI Summary
The FBI has changed its stance on the New Orleans attack, now labeling it a terrorist act by a "lone wolf," despite earlier claims of accomplices. Meanwhile, reports reveal that the suspect in the Las Vegas Cybertruck bombing had served at the same military base and rented a vehicle from the same app as the New Orleans suspect. This raises concerns about the FBI's credibility, as many believe they primarily target patriots and mislead the public.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The FBI, after having initially asserted the New Orleans attack was NOT a terrorist attack, is now saying it WAS a terrorist attack but from a “lone wolf”, after having said there were other accomplices, at the same time it is being reported that the suspect in the Las Vegas Cybertruck bombing served at the same military base as the New Orleans suspect and rented a vehicle from the same app as the the New Orleans suspect? When the general population thinks all the FBI does is persecute patriots and lie to cover their asses, it’s not a good situation.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm trying to understand the situation with the "Cancer Research for Kids" bill. Has the Senate really been sitting on it since May or June? It feels like they might be delaying it to bundle it with the spending bill, possibly to shift blame to Republicans. This raises serious concerns about their intentions.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Can someone explain this to me? Has the Senate been sitting on the "Cancer Research for Kids" bill since May / June and done nothing with it? Did they deliberately delay passing that bill so they could stick it in the current spending bill, along with all the other shite, so they could blame the rejection on Republicans? I mean there is evil. But there are also levels of evil. Did Democrats go to Satan-levels of evil here?
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Justin Trudeau BANS More Firearms in Canada & Will DONATE THEM to Ukraine! PURE COMMUNISM! https://t.co/Bq2IDRqvNO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canada is increasingly resembling a state of oppression, with Justin Trudeau's government implementing measures that restrict freedoms. The country faces a housing crisis, and Trudeau's solution involves cracking down on private property rentals like Airbnbs, which many see as a form of communism. Additionally, Canada has banned over 300 types of firearms, claiming they belong on battlefields, while simultaneously planning to donate these weapons to Ukraine, a nation that has suspended elections under martial law. This raises questions about the integrity of democracy when governments prioritize control over citizens' rights. The situation reflects a broader trend of statism and the erosion of democratic principles, both in Canada and abroad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I say that Canada is going the way of the commie, I'm not trying to be funny or glib. I'm actually understating the severity of the problem in Canada. Viva Fry, former Montreal litigator turned current Florida rumbler in my home office. It is beautiful here in Florida, and I'm going back to Canada for the winter break. And I dare say I'm not too excited to go back to the sub zero communism in Canada.
And if you've been following me for any period of time, you know that I use the word communism quite often to describe the state of affairs in Canada. And some of you say, Viva, it's not communism. Okay. It's statism. Whatever you wanna call it, it is not freedom anymore.
And if you had any lingering doubts, the news coming out of Canada will blow your freaking mind. But to do this, we've gotta take a trip across the world starting in Ukraine. Now many of you know that we have been supporting the fight for democracy out of the democracy that is Ukraine for several years now, costing 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars, if not trillions total. We are supporting democracy in a country that has suspended elections indefinitely. But don't take my word for it.
Here is an article from a publication called, and I'm not joking, the Journal of Democracy talking about how it's not such a big deal that they're not holding elections in the democracy of Ukraine. If the irony doesn't make you wanna puke, you've got no gag reflex. Journal of democracy by Anna Romandash, April 2024. Were it not for Russia's war, Ukrainian citizens would have gone to the polls a few weeks ago to pick their president. They would have voted last year too in parliamentary elections scheduled for October, yet neither contest happened.
Ukraine's constitution prohibits elections under martial law, which president Volodymyr Zelensky declared when Russia launched its invasion on 24 February 2022 and has been enforced ever since. In order to protect democracy and in the fight for democracy, we need to indefinitely suspend democratic elections. Even without the law, organizing mass elections amid an ongoing invasion poses serious practical challenges. How to run the vote in Russian occupied territories, how to guarantee voters safety, what to do about the millions of refugees abroad, and how to provide the necessary time and space for political campaigning. Plus running elections cost money, and the Russian assault has cost Ukraine not only invaluable losses in human life and generational trauma, but 1,000,000,000 of dollars for defense and reconstruction with the economic impact of the war exceeding $51,000,000,000 per year.
Yet without fair elections, can Ukraine have a just democracy? As the country and its people battle to survive, do elections even matter right now? And to quote Ace Ventura Good question, Aquana. Do elections even matter in a country that is purportedly a democracy fighting for its own survival? Do you need to hold elections in order to determine if the president who has currently brought the country into war willingly or unwillingly, some would say willingly, whether or not that president should be replaced?
Some might say that they're not holding elections not because they can't, as we will see in a second, but because they do not want to. The they being Zelensky because he knows he is not popular and won't survive an election, which has brought that country into 2 years of total devastation. But, yeah, it's too dangerous to hold elections. How do you do it? They're spending too much money fighting the war.
How do you ensure safe elections? But the utter insanity and intellectual dishonesty of this position, they have to suspend elections because martial law has been declared. Because how do you conduct safe elections during a time of war? When you find out that the Kyiv nightlife is bustling and in fact more popular now than it was before the invasion, you'll ask yourself, how can you go to bars at night in a world where it's too dangerous to go out and vote during the day? And again, don't take my word for it.
Let's go to an article in the propaganda rag, CBS News. CBS News, Ukraine's nightlife is thriving despite Russia's war even where it has had to rise from the ashes. July 31, 2023. Kharkiv, Ukraine, a summer's evening, a sidewalk cafe, smiling friends. It could have been a scene from almost anywhere, but it's not anywhere.
It's Kharkiv, not far from the Russian border in Eastern Ukraine and within easy reach of missiles and airstrikes. Despite the missiles, Ukraine's nightlife is rocking. Bars and clubs are full. We visited 1 and found the place jumping with music pumping, drinks flowing freely, and young Ukrainians dancing like there's no tomorrow. Here's a fun fact.
There are now more bars and restaurants open in the capital city of Kyiv than there were before the start of Russia's full scale invasion more than 17 months ago. So if we just work real hard to cram this circle peg into that square hole or the other way around, I forget which. It's so risky. It's such a time of war that martial law needs to be declared, and you cannot conduct safe elections while the nightlife is bustling and in fact more popular than it was before the invasion. That does not add up, dear Watson.
Now are you gonna stop there? What So while the west fights for the democracy of Ukraine, Ukraine suspends elections indefinitely. Elections which could, in theory, put an end to this very conflict, and we still say that we're fighting for democracy while destroying the very foundation of democracy. That doesn't sound a whole hell of a lot like democracy. That sounds a lot like statism, fascism, communism, whatever the heck you wanna call it.
It is the opposite of democracy. Enter Canada. How do we get over this funk? Now for those of you who may not know, under the reign of Justin Trudeau, who has great admiration for the basic dictatorship of China, Canada has basically gone full commie. Earlier this week, Justin Trudeau put out a tweet addressing how he's going to tackle the housing crisis in Canada because if you don't know, there is a serious housing crisis in Canada.
In the tweet, Justin Trudeau announces how they're gonna crack down on the private use of Airbnbs for the purposes of rental properties to unlock the capacity of housing. For Canadians, that sounds a whole hell of a lot like communism. From Justin Trudeau at Justin Trudeau, there are more than 200,000 short term rentals across the country like Airbnbs and Vrbo's that could be turned into housing. So we're giving cities more resources to crack down on those rentals and unlock more homes for Canadians. Now before I went crazy and replied, I had to make sure that this was not in fact Justin Trudeau's parody account called Justin Trudeau's ego because reading this, it actually sounded like bonafide parody.
It is not parody. It's Justin Trudeau announcing how they're going to crack down on the private use of private property in order to unlock that property for the purposes of addressing a housing crisis of Justin Trudeau's own creation. And after I ensured that this was not in fact a parody account, I replied as follows. Everyone, let's take a brief pause from this vlog for a word from our sponsor. Big changes are on the horizon.
Very soon, Trump will be back in office, and RFK Junior will be taking over the CDC, NIH, FDA. Get ready for the shakeup. RFK even posted, the FDA's war on public health is about to end, calling out their suppression of treatments like Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and essential vitamins. The wellness company is already ahead of the curve with emergency kits that are stocked with these limited access medications. These kits cut through the red tape, especially during the holiday seasons when getting sick during travel is the norm.
Be prepared for over 30 illnesses without stepping into an urgent care. I'm talking ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, z pak, amoxicillin, everything you need to take control of your health. Their guidebook outlines common treatments for UTIs, strep throat, bacterial infections, respiratory illness, and more. All it takes is filling out a digital intake form, and your kit arrives to your door in 1 to 2 weeks, and they even have emergency kits for kids. No more sick inconveniences during the holidays.
Order your kit now by heading over to t w c dot health forward slash viva, gets you $30 off and free shipping. Twc.healthforward/viva, $30 off and free shipping, available only for US residents. And now back to the vlog. VivaFry at the VivaFry. Appreciate the euphemisms, quote, crackdown, end quote.
Prohibit private use of private property, quote, unlock, end quote, nationalize private property, communism. We are witnessing communism, statism, fascism, whatever the hell you wanna call it. We are witnessing this from Eastern Europe all the way to Canada. Justin Trudeau saying, yeah, we're gonna go ahead and basically nationalize private property in order to address a housing crisis, which is a crisis of his own manufacturer by importing all mass legal, illegal foreign people into Canada when the housing system can't accommodate it. And yeah.
So Justin Trudeau, in order to solve the problem he created, is going to nationalize private property, crackdown on private use of private property, but wait, there's actually more. In the quest to control how Canadians can use their own private property, Justin Trudeau going full commie yet again has announced yet more bans on fire arms out of Canada. You will not believe where this goes because it ties in the perfect bow, the communism coming out of Canada, the martial law being declared in Ukraine, all of these countries fighting for democracy and not living by any form of democracy. From the Associated Press, Ottawa, Ontario. Canada said Thursday it is outlawing another 324 firearm varieties.
Guns the public safety minister said belong on the battlefield, not in the hands of hunters or sport shooters. Ottawa also said it is working with the government of Ukraine to see how the guns can be donated to support the fight against Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The move follows the May 2020 ban of 1,500 makes and models of firearms, a number that grew to more than 2,000 by November of this year as new variants were identified. The latest restriction announced Thursday by public safety minister, Dominique LeBlanc, follows expressions of concern from gun control advocates that many assault style firearms were not included in the 2020 ban. Quote, this means these firearms can no longer be used, end quote, LeBlanc said.
I actually cover that ban back in the day with a stand alone car vlog. I'll include a small clip from that so you can compare and contrast the 2020 Canadian Viva to the 2024 American Viva. I'm not yet American, but I'm in Florida. You know what I mean? Despite the reduced in person sittings, Justin Trudeau overnight came in with a sweeping ban on over 1500 military grade assault rifles.
How did that happen? Well, this is what our neighbors to the south might not fully understand. This didn't come by way of legislation that was debated and passed. This came by way of what is called an order in council. And what is an order in council?
I'll read you the legalese and then I'll break it down simply. Orders in council are not discussed by parliament and do not require legislation by parliament before being implemented. When it comes to orders in council, there are no bills that are drafted. There is no parliamentary debate. There is the governor general who is appointed by the prime minister saying, it is law, therefore it is law.
But reading the words of Dominique LeBlanc on paper, don't do it justice, when you listen to this video, you are going to understand that the governments of the world, the governments of the west are not interested in democracy. They are not interested in the people. They are interested in consolidating power and ensuring that the people never again have that power. And if you haven't seen the video yet, here's the video and try not to vomit as you watch it.
Speaker 1: Today, the government is adding a further 324 unique makes and models of assault style firearms to the list of prohibited firearms in Canada. This prohibition takes effect immediately. This means these firearms can no longer be legally used, sold, or imported in Canada, and can only be transferred or transported under extremely limited circumstances. As part of that process, the government of Canada has committed to the Ukrainian government to the Ukrainian government to the Ukrainian government to identify whether some of these guns could be donated to support the fight for democracy in Ukraine. As part of that process, the government of Canada has committed to the Ukrainian government to identify whether some of these guns could be donated to support the fight for democracy in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: In order to defend democracy, we need to indefinitely suspend the democracy. In order to preserve democracy, we need to siphon off 100 of 1,000,000,000 of taxpayer dollars to fight for a country that itself is suspending democracy, taking away the rights of Canadian citizens, taking away their firearms from law abiding citizens, and then donating them to Ukraine, the country that will not hold elections indefinitely. And I've gotta tell you, if that makes sense to you, you might be Justin Trudeau or you might just be a commie. And most importantly, if you haven't yet done it, take 3 seconds, go down there, make sure that you're subscribed, turn on notifications, drop a comment in the comment section below because it feeds the algorithm. If any of this makes any sense to you, you either understand exactly where it's going or you don't understand where it's going.
And if that hasn't horrified you enough, just wait for the after credits part of this vlog. But you know what to do everybody share to help the channel grow. Most importantly, exercise, eat healthy sunlight, talk to people in real life, and now you unfortunately know your vlog. Peace out, Reeves. Booyah.
The Soviet Union. I thought you guys broke up. Yes. That's what we wanted you to think.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
commie tube https://youtu.be/6Mz6q_8VMGI?si=y4UY40vK9F4DuvTc
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
When you appreciate that this is a bipartisan Russia witch-hunt, you understand: Canada has fallen. And @Lauren_Southern is standing up to the tyrannical regime. There is no difference between the conservatives and the liberals: they are both disgusting corrupt piles of crap. https://t.co/JLUVpo5nCE
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's crucial to ensure that shared content isn't exploited by foreign entities to undermine Canadian democracy. I maintain full creative control over everything I publish through my media contracts. Concerns have been raised about online content unintentionally aiding foreign propaganda, particularly regarding recent immigration policy critiques. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a pause on immigration, which I have long argued for. It's interesting to see this portrayed as Russian disinformation. I believe Trudeau's decision is correct, and I hope this committee doesn't dismiss valid concerns simply because they align with opinions from individuals with foreign-sounding names.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It I think it's important to do diligence and you have significant following on social media platforms where misinformation can spread rapidly. How do you ensure that the content you share is not used by foreign entities to amplify narratives that undermine Canadian democracy or national security?
Speaker 1: Are you accusing me of spreading narratives that have undermined
Speaker 0: Just asking the question. Just like, you know, in terms of how do you ensure that the content you share is not used by foreign entities to amplify narratives that undermine Canadian democracy or national security? What what what measures do you take?
Speaker 1: I ensure that every contract I sign and have ever signed in media gives me full creative control of every single thing I say and publish. That's how I ensure it.
Speaker 0: Well, there there's concerns that individuals or groups may be unintentionally aiding foreign governments and spreading divisive narratives. How do you respond to allegations that your online content has been used to further Russian propaganda or influence Canadian public opinion?
Speaker 1: As far as I'm aware, just this month, prime minister Justin Trudeau announced a pause to immigration or a decrease in immigration for the next 3 years, citing unsustainable growth. This is one of the critiques that has been my main critique on Tenet Media and off Tenet Media. And having it portrayed as Russian disinformation by this committee or even aiding and abetting Russians has been very interesting. I may understand I may have been right too early on this issue. And as so, I must be socially punished by this regime.
But although much too late, I happen to believe that Justin Trudeau is making the correct decision there, and I would hope that this committee wouldn't advocate Canadians stop drinking water or wearing seatbelts because someone with the last name Ivanov or Petrov suggested it was a good idea.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Why is HIV increasing at never before seen rates in Alberta? Is it the Covid jab? Or is it bad immigration policies? Or am I a racist bigot for having noticed? https://t.co/97VVUVYBgm
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The Don of a New America! But is there cheating in Arizona? All eyes on @KariLake race. https://t.co/0ox7yTspeW
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is my first car vlog after a significant political event. Donald Trump achieved a decisive victory over Kamala Harris, with strong support from various demographics, including record numbers of Latino and Black voters. The election results reveal the failure of elitist narratives and polling, as swing states like Miami Dade turned red.
Kari Lake is closely contesting with Ruben Gallego in Arizona, raising questions about vote counts, especially since Gallego has more votes than Harris. This situation suggests potential irregularities. The upcoming days are crucial as ballots are still being counted, and Lake's success could expose corruption within the political system.
This victory marks a monumental shift in American politics, and I encourage everyone to support independent platforms for free speech. Now, I’m heading to a live podcast to discuss these developments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alrighty. Party peoples of the interwebs. This is my first car vlog since the dawn of a new America. Dawn pun intended. I just made that up right now.
Donald Trump in a crushing decisive defeat over cackling commie y, Kamala Harris, the phoniest candidate to have ever been run and the worst candidate to have ever been run. Decisive is not the word. There's gonna be a sweep in all swing states. They're waiting to call Arizona for whatever the reason. You got Nevada, which is gonna go Trump.
Decisive is an understatement. Miami Dade went red. 40 plus, 45% of the Latino community voted for Donald Trump. Record numbers of black men voted for Donald Trump. Record numbers of white men voted for Donald Trump.
Record numbers of white women voted for Donald Trump. Record numbers of black women voted for Donald Trump, but still a little bit lower than the other stats. Decisive. This is a mandate. This is a mandate that ends all of those bullcrap federal persecutions.
This is a mandate that shuts up all of the pathological propagandists, the Kyle Kalinski's of the world, the crystal balls of the world. This is a victory that makes those propagandist hacks look like the propagandist hacks that they are tweeting out on election day. It's gonna be 319 electoral college votes for Kamala Harris. You got your butts handed to you. A pesky Canadian with minimal knowledge, I say that modestly, who has acquired a substantial bit of knowledge of American law and politics.
I got it right to a t. I think I missed one point. If Arizona and Nevada go to Trump because I didn't realize that Maine has, like, for whatever the reason, 2 and 1 electoral colleges. So I'm gonna off by 1 in my prediction because I said 311 and226 for Kamala Harris to Donald Trump's 311, and it looks like it's gonna be 312 to Kamala Harris's 226. No.
I said 227 for Kamala. Either way, I'm gonna be off by 1. The hacks have been revealed. The liars have been revealed. The arrogant pricks of Hollywood elites have been revealed.
They were never reflecting any public sentiment. They were trying to craft public sentiment. The fake pollsters, no no no names in particular coming out the day before. Iowa's gonna go to Kamala Harris because Iowa and women are obsessed with abortions because that's all that these elitists are obsessed with, so they think everybody else is obsessed with abortions. No.
Not only did it not go to Kamala Harris, it went more to Trump than it did in 2020 from what I understand. Decisive. The law fair is going to come to an end. People should hang their heads in shame. We'll see what corrupt justice Juan Marchand does in New York.
Juan Marchand, remember his daughter, Lauren Marchand, works with, Authentic HQ that was raising money for Schiff for Schiff McBranes, Adam McShiff, working with other Kamala Harris packs. Remember that one? 1 of the, founders of that company founded White Dudes for a house. Remember this entire corrupt system that since 2015 tried to depict Donald Trump as a racist, tried to depict him as a Russian collusionist, and the only ones colluding with Russia, oddly enough, Hillary Clinton and the DNC. Then they tried to impeach him.
Then they tried to get him off the ballot for the insurrection that they also created themselves. Then they tried to bankrupt him, lock him up, then they tried to kill him. And after all of that decisive, it's amazing what happens when you don't have millions upon millions of ballots to find in the middle of the night because 2024, they hadn't mailed out ballots to everybody. By 2024, the GOP had gotten a little bit wise to the law fair. By 2024, the courts had seen a little bit of that spotlight, that beautiful, beautiful spotlight of accountability, and they intervene.
It's amazing what happens. All you have to do in order to beat the cheat is overwhelm them with the vote and apply the rules even minimally, and they don't get away with it. But now this brings us to what is going on in Arizona. Kari Lake is still up there fighting against Ruben Gallego, and there's some very interesting chicanery that's afoot in Nevada. I don't know when they can count until, but I know they can cure ballots until Sunday, November 10.
Kari Lake is neck and neck with Ruben Gallego. Full disclosure, I bet on, Kari Lake and against, Ruben Gallego because that's what I believe should happen. That's what I believe in a fair world would happen, and that's also what I want to happen because Kari Lake is awesome. Full stop. They are now neck and neck, and the more the votes come in, the closer that margin becomes.
I think it's now 48% to 49%. And there's some serious chicanery and serious questions afoot because there were a tweet that I saw in the Twitterverse earlier today saying, how is it possible Ruben Gallego, the Democrat nominee in Arizona, got more votes than Kamala Harris? Because go look at the numbers, by the way. As of now, at 76% reporting, Ruben Gallego, the Democrat, candidate in Arizona for senate, has more votes than Kamala Harris. Try to make that make sense.
It doesn't make sense. It can't make sense. And if that's the final tally, it won't make sense and it'll be suspicious and I dare say criminally suspicious. The only caveat, the only asterisk on that is that they're still tallying the votes. So it's possible Kamala Harris's number comes up so that Ruben Gallego and Kamala Harris are commensurate in that number.
In terms of how many votes they got in Nevada, in Arizona. Sorry. But the margin between Trump and Kamala Harris is much bigger than the margin between Gallego and Kari Lake. Now that can be explained for a number of other reasons. It's local state politics and not national politics.
And so in as much as Trump beat, Kamala Harris by 4% in Arizona, Gallego's up by 1% for now. But if Gallegos gets aggregate total more votes than Kamala Harris in Arizona, you know that there's chicanery afoot and you know that there was chicanery afoot in 2020. So to be following that, they have until Sunday, November 10th to cure ballots in Arizona. Kari Lake fighting the fight, and you now see how badly they wanna keep Kari Lake out of office. Because if Kari Lake rises to the reigns of power in Arizona, they're gonna be lifting the hood of that corrupt system out there, and they're gonna be revealing a lot of the skeletons in the under the hood skeletons.
You know what I'm getting at? She will reveal the rampant corruption that has been benefiting the uni party there to some extent. This is not just straight up a big d, big r, difference. This is uni party corruption versus the independence out there, the Donald Trump's of the political sphere, the Marjorie Taylor greens of the political sphere, and the Carrie Lakes of the political sphere to be continued, to be followed. But right now I'm getting ready to go on with the unusual suspects.
Our first live podcast thingy thing since the most decisive, wonderful, beautiful victory in American political history. It is the greatest comeback in political history in the world. There's no way to understate how decisive, how amazing, how monumental this victory is. And you got the propagandist on the left. Yeah.
A modest victory. Horse crap. Horse crap. Swing states sweep. Popular vote decisive.
It is decisive. It's a day for America, and my goodness has America gone from the precipice of utter disaster on July 13 to the miracle of the bright future that lies before. Holy cow. People, if you like what I do, you know what to do. Like, share, subscribe, hit the notification bell.
Make sure your notifications are turned on. YouTube, or as I consistently call it, comm YouTube, is doing its very best to make sure that the voices are not heard, and that is why we have Rumble. Go to Rumble, vivafry on Rumble, vivabarneslaw.locals above average community out there. Now I gotta get out and go do a podcast. Peace out, peeps.
Boo yeah.
Speaker 1: No problem. Wow. Genius you are. Can we stop with that? I I appreciate it.
I don't like the stupid turkeys. Alright? Let's just let's just knock that stupid shit off, please. Alright? I did.
I said I was leaving, and then the following day get that through your dumb heads. The following day, I turned around and I said that there's no chance in the world that I'm leaving my country. Thank you very much. Alright? Not leaving anyway.
You leave. This is my country, and I have every right, every single right within which to turn out when we stop so we can alright. 2 seconds, and we're gonna end up blocking the city.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Kamala Harris said the word “fight” 20 times in her concessions speech. 20 times. I counted. She also said “and we will continue to wage the fight… in the public square”. Impeach her. Their rules, not mine. #ImpeachKamala https://t.co/tqJ0IkB0j0
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will persist in our efforts through voting, legal action, and public discourse, as well as in more subtle ways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we will continue to wage this fight in the voting booth, in the courts, and in the public square, and we will also wage it in quieter ways.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
So Kamala Harris is late to her own concession speech, and playing music about hating the police and how police want to kill people in the streets “fo sho’l What a perfect way to end the campaign of that disgusting human. https://t.co/3UUuz1CtQ7
Video Transcript AI Summary
When our pride was low, we felt lost and frustrated with the world, struggling against the harsh realities of life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When our pride was low, looking at the world like where do we go? And we hate poor poor, wanna kill us dead in the street
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the vote counts for Democratic candidates from 2008 to 2024, noting a significant jump in 2020 with Biden's 81 million votes compared to previous years. It’s clear to me that something is off, and I believe the 2020 election was stolen. Period.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The exact number of votes for the Democrat, according the Wikipedia: -2008: Obama gets 69 million -2012: Obama gets 65 million -2016: Hillary gets 65 million -2020: Joe Biden gets 81 MILLION -2024: Kamala Harris gets 66 million One of these things, is not like the others. 🤔 2020 was stolen. Period. Pure and simple.
@zerohedge - zerohedge
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but can we go back to what happened here? https://t.co/FkScNHivuU
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the Kamala Harris team as a reflection of Sin City, filled with questionable characters and scandals. From Harris's controversial rise to power and her husband's infidelity to Tim Walz's fabrications and Arnold Schwarzenegger's hypocrisy during lockdowns, the list goes on. Eminem, Michael Cohen, Gavin Newsom, and others contribute to a narrative of moral failings. The post highlights a range of figures, each with their own controversies, leaving me to ponder the implications for America’s choices.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Yeah, Sin City pretty much encapsulates the Kamala Harris team. 1) Kamal Harris - DEI who slept with a married man her senior to launch her career; 2) Doug Emhoff - Kamala's husband, a man who banged his child's nanny and got her pregnant; 3) Tim Walz - Kamala's running mate, a man who lied about serving in combat, lied about being at Tiananmen Square, set up a Covid snitch line, and watched his state burn; 4) Arnold Schwarzenegger - another nanny-banger who told American to "screw your freedom" while he sucked on a stogie in his jacuzzi after a long bike ride while American were locked down, shut down, and masked up; 5) Dick Cheney - War criminal who endorsed Kamala Harris; 6) Liz Cheney - war-whore and daughter of a war criminal, who led the unlawful kangaroo Jan. 6 Committee and subsequently destroyed evidence; 7) Eminem - pleaded guilty to possession of a concealed weapon, author of such lyrics as "Girls neither, you ain't nothin' but a slut to me" 8) Michael Cohen - convicted perjurer, overall scumbag extraordinaire; 9) Gavin Newsom - a man who has destroyed California, defied his own Covid lockdown rules, and whose wife begged Harvey Weinstein for campaign donations after she alleges he "raped" her; 10) Lizzo - a disgusting degenerate who allegedly coerced her staff to eat bananas out of he vaginas of Amsterdam sex workers; 11) Cardi B - a woman who bragged about drugging and robbing men, has ties to P Diddy, and is the author of such lyrical masterpieces as "Wet Ass Pussy"; 12) Joseph R Biden - a man showered with his own daughter at an inappropriate age, according to his own daughter; 13) Bill Gates - devil incarnate, whose own wife divorced him over his disgusting relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The choice is yours, America.
@DouglasEmhoff - Doug Emhoff
Kamala is on The Sphere! Go vote: http://IWillVote.com
I Will Vote
Be a voter. Find everything you need to vote in your state's next election.
iwillvote.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a chilling description of the MAIDS program in Canada, detailing the administration of medical assistance in dying. The account was so disturbing it felt like something out of a horror movie. You can check out the clip for more insights.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The process of administration of death under Canada’s MAIDS program (medical assistance in dying) described in horrifying detail by @KelsiBurns on @jordanbpeterson This is the stuff of horror movies. https://t.co/oZEUupPsRL
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Link to clip https://youtu.be/3YYxOfwrsrU?si=YJ0gzLQZbTjw_MOx
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Tomorrow at 12:30, Border Patrol whistleblower @ZachApotheker is coming on. If you have not yet watched “Line in the Sand”, watch it. It’s on Rumble. See you all tomorrow. https://t.co/XaXA4fG4FP
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual claims to have made $120,000 last year but suggests Border Patrol agents could passively allow illegal activity to continue for personal benefit. They assert some agents may face financial ruin.
The speaker references Lincoln Riley and suggests that signing certain files contributes to "blood on our hands." They imply a moral responsibility for the harm caused to victims of crime. They ask how agents would feel if the victim were their own family member.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you afraid of of what they might do to you? I'm making a 120, 130 I made a 120,000 last year. I could sit like every other border patrol agent sits back, just keep rolling them in. Mhmm. Keep letting it happen.
I got my health coverage. They're gonna face ruin, financial ruin, and their lives will be destroyed. You're looking at it. For all the board patrol who just started watching this, yeah, a lot of you are gonna probably make jokes and say he shouldn't have done that, how stupid he was, or he's a fake Christian. Let me say one thing.
Seriously, at this point, let me say one thing. When a girl like Lincoln Riley is jogging down in Georgia
Speaker 1: yeah. When a girl like Lincoln Riley's fuck, dude. No. I'm crying.
Speaker 0: Just keep still keep them. Keep them on. When a girl like Lake
Speaker 1: and Riley is talking. She's top of her glass at nursing, and we sign those fucking files, man. That's blood on our hands. That's blood on your hands. And that's a joke maybe to you.
You just keep collecting that check. But let me ask you this. If Luis your father or your sister or your aunt, how would you feel?
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Link to the documentary on TCN https://tuckercarlson.com/line-in-the-sand
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
The full hearing of Trump's appeal of New York Nipple Judge Engoron's insane ruling. Watch and share. https://t.co/y2lVwbnd4h
reSee.it AI Summary
I noted that Kamala Harris inadvertently revealed the truth about her running mate's dishonesty. I discussed Amber Thurman's tragic death, clarifying that it was due to her choice of a chemical abortion with mifepristone, which led to complications and neglect at the hospital. I expressed frustration over how some exploit such tragedies for political gain. I also pointed out Tim Walz's history of questionable statements, suggesting that his pattern of dishonesty aligns with the broader issue of political exploitation.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
Kamala Harris accidentally told the truth, and thereby confirmed that her running-mate is a pathological liar. Amber Thurman did not die because of any abortion ban. She died because she decided to do a “chemical abortion” and took mifepristone. Began hemorrhaging. Did not shed the fetal tissue. Was neglected by the hospital for over 20 hours. Then died of sepsis. These disgusting scumbags lie about and exploit the death of people for their political agendas. But given how Tim Walz lied about being in war, lied about being in Tiannemen Square, probably lied about his son having witnessed a shooting… All to promote a political agenda… This should come as no surprise.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman opted for medication instead of surgery, went home, and later experienced complications. She went to the hospital due to bleeding, where there was a 20-hour delay in treatment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So instead of having a surgical procedure, she had, medication and basically went back home and then had some complications and went to the hospital because she was bleeding, and they delayed 20 hours.
@thevivafrei - Viva Frei
How in the hell does the Director of public affairs of FEMA lock their Twitter account during an emergency? @jaclynroth https://t.co/kMCIQxBAcI
