reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @trannythro
@trannythro - Harry Potter Obama Sonic 10 Lois
3 more clips of Nick Fuentes defending pedophilia in 2023. He openly states that he doesn't "believe in the concept" of age of consent or marital rape, wants to marry a 16 year old but not until he's twice her age, and believes he has the right to rape her whenever he feels like. https://t.co/ClymDB47kr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the age of consent should be lowered and challenges the very concept itself by tying consent to marriage. They claim marriage equates to ongoing consent, stating that “marriage is consent” and that there is “no such thing as marital rape” because when you marry a person, you have a “marital obligation to give your spouse sex whenever they want it.” They assert this is “literally Catholic doctrine,” and that “the only moral way to have sex is within marriage.” They go further to claim that “the only way to get married is to consent to sex on demand, and both partners agree to that,” and that denying it is a “mortal sin.” They summarize this as their position on consent theory and label it as their version of the age of consent.
They insist the distinction is not “age of consent” but “age of marriage,” challenging the concept of an age threshold for sexual activity. They question the concept itself, remarking, “What is this? Christians have no use for such things,” adding, “Christians have no use for such a concept.” They describe a Christian sexual ethic as one where “you get married,” and “a Christian doesn’t have sex with anybody,” but rather “has sex with their spouse within marriage,” and they assert that “nobody’s getting married at a pre pubescent age.”
The speaker then asserts that people “get married when they’re at a reproductive age, when they’re adolescents,” indicating they are redefining the concept of marriage timing. Overall, the statements present a view that marriage is the framework for sexual consent, that marital obligations govern sexual activity, and that Christian doctrine underpins this approach, while challenging conventional notions of age limits and the feasibility of premarital sex.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the age of consent should be lower. I don't even really believe in the concept. You wanna know why? Because marriage is consent. You wanna know what's wrong with sex?
Being married means you consent to sex all the time. There's no such thing as marital rape. Because when you marry a person, you have a marital obligation to give your spouse sex whenever they want it. It's literally Catholic doctrine. So, you know, the only moral way to have sex is within marriage.
The only way to get married is to consent to sex on demand, and both partners agree to that. That's their obligation. It's a mortal mortal sin to deny it. So that's that's how's that for consent theory? That's my that's my age of consent.
It's not age of consent, it's age of marriage. Age of consent. What is this? What is this? Christians have no use for such things.
Christians have no use for such a concept. You get married. A Christian a Christian doesn't have sex with anybody. A Christian has sex with their spouse within marriage. And nobody's getting married at a pre pubescent age.
People get married when they're at a reproductive age, when they're adolescents, and so that, you know, I'm redefining it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the age of consent is a feminist social construct. They question why people are upset about someone being 17 rather than 18, noting that in Florida the age of consent is 18, while in Illinois it is 17 and in other states it is 16, with variation across countries and states. They point out that when the age of consent is 18 in Florida, dating somebody a year younger is framed as “the worst thing possible,” highlighting how perceptions shift with different statutory ages. The speaker then contends that age of consent is, at its core, about the age at which an adult can consent, and asks, “Do we really believe that you have to be 18 years old in order to consent to sex, otherwise it's rape?” They challenge the notion that adults who are past puberty cannot engage in relationships without it being deemed rape, suggesting a critical view of the rigidity around consent age.
In terms of the broader purpose of the age of consent, the speaker offers a provocative interpretation: “What I think age of consent is about is really, … what it's really about is artificially increasing the sexual marketplace value of older women.” They emphasize that this is not presented as a new idea but as a conclusion they have discussed before on the show. The overall argument centers on questioning the universality and motives behind fixed consent ages, contrasting state-by-state differences and scrutinizing the social and market implications they believe are embedded in the concept of consent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole age of consent thing is really a feminist social construct. I'll just put that out there. Because what are we really talking about here? Why are people so upset if somebody is 17 rather than 18? Well, that's because in the state of Florida, the age of consent is 18.
It just so happens that the age of consent in Illinois is 17, and in other states it's 16. And it varies from country to country and state to state. But if the age of consent is 18 in Florida, then it is the worst thing possible that you're, you know, dating somebody that's a year younger. Right? End of the world.
I will say that, you know, let's think about what's really going on here. Age of consent means the age at which an adult can consent. Do we really believe that you have to be 18 years old in order to consent to sex, otherwise it's rape? Are we really supposed to believe that people, adults, grown adults who are past the point of puberty engage in a relationship and that becomes a rape. To me, what I think age of consent is about is really, and I've said this before on the show, it's not a new take.
I think what it's really about is artificially increasing the sexual marketplace value of older women. I think that's really what it's about.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a disturbing set of preferences expressed as a personal viewpoint. The speaker rejects any idea of waiting or gradual enjoyment, insisting, “No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.” This metaphor is used to describe a desire for immediacy and immediacy in relationships.
The speaker then extends the metaphor to women, arguing against aging in a traditional, patient way. They state, “Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.” The claim asserts that women do not age gracefully like wine, but rather age like milk, contradicting the notion of aging well.
Continuing, the speaker proposes a specific, controversial timeline for marriage and reproduction. They say, “I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something.” They justify this with calculations about age differences: “Here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.” The speaker draws a progressive, increasingly favorable age difference for themselves as they age.
The speaker amplifies their stance with an explicit age preference, saying, “Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine. Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent.” They further claim, “That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.”
Overall, the transcript centers on a provocative, highly problematic set of beliefs about age, consent, and the supposed desirability of a 16-year-old partner, framed through aggressive metaphors and explicit preferences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.
Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.
That's not how they work. Yeah, I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something. Because here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference.
When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.
Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine.
Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent. That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.