TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @truthstreamnews

truthstreamnews
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 1:33 PM
Saved - March 12, 2026 at 4:42 PM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

“We stole all your knowledge and art, and now we’re gonna put a meter on it and sell it back to you. You’re welcome.”

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 SAM ALTMAN: “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.” https://t.co/KuoMDp1upQ

truthstreamnews
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 4:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed that MAHA Action deleted a video of RFK Jr. discussing a new universal vaccine for corona and flu, which he claims will be safer and more effective. It raises questions about their motives. In his 2021 book, RFK Jr. criticized this vaccine, linking it to totalitarianism. He also references Fauci, who has been a controversial figure for years, in a chapter that questions his ethics regarding experiments on children. I shared a screencap of a related post for further context.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

MAHA Action just deleted this new video of RFK Jr. talking about how they're developing a new universal vaccine at NIH for corona and flu which is "gonna be a much safer and more effective vaccine". Hazard a guess on why they'd do that? https://t.co/nClS18k2hS

Video Transcript AI Summary
NIH is pursuing a universal vaccine designed to cover the entire range of viruses, aiming to mimic natural immunity. The developers claim it would be effective against any mutation and would not drive the virus to mutate. They expect the approach could work not only for coronaviruses but also for flu, offering broad protection. They describe the vaccine as safer and more effective than current options. The dialogue centers on ongoing questions as the project advances, emphasizing a shift toward a single, universal solution that could, if successful, provide cross-viral protection and reduce the need for virus-specific vaccines. The statements focus on safety, efficacy, and cross-coverage across coronaviruses and influenza.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you take your question again? Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you have your question?

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

RFK Jr. told everyone straight up what his job as HHS secretary is — “to restore trust in the vaccine program”. He’s a government vaccine salesman now.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Could it be because, oh, I dunno, IN HIS OWN BOOK THAT HE WROTE in 2021 RFK Jr. called out this same Gates and Google-funded universal vaccine under the header (and you can't even make this up) "Laying Pipe for Totalitarianism"??? https://t.co/5ErSfZWIgn

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

The same one Fauci (who has been preemptively pardoned for a decade) has been talking about for years? That same Fauci RFK Jr.'s book is named after? The same book which literally has a chapter titled "DR. FAUCI, MR. HYDE: NIAID’S BARBARIC AND ILLEGAL EXPERIMENTS ON CHILDREN?" https://t.co/aBQ2hcJmhG

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

@slomdumballs @gregreese https://t.co/VPGiJlxZlV

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

@JoshWalkos Here take this, it’s a screencap of your post on it and the deletion: https://t.co/EiWM43gZkv

truthstreamnews
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Saved - August 8, 2025 at 11:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The government has openly acknowledged its lack of financial accountability in its 2024 Financial Report, revealing that for 28 years, auditors have been unable to provide an opinion on its financial reports due to significant recordkeeping issues. Key departments, including Defense and Education, cannot substantiate loans or liabilities, raising concerns about their management of taxpayer money. With improper payments totaling $162 billion reported for FY 2024 and projections indicating Social Security and Medicare funds will run out soon, the situation appears dire. The complexity of the federal government is cited as a barrier to accountability.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

While everyone's busy infighting, the government openly admitted in its 2024 Financial Report that it is totally financially unaccountable to We the People. It's all here in black and white: 🧵 https://t.co/efIalBsB8i

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

First: Congress, which is supposed to have power of the purse, passed S.2170 in 1994, a reform law requiring 24 government agencies to provide annual audited financial reports of their activities, spending, and revenues starting in 1997. This includes: Department of Agriculture Department of Commerce Department of Defense Department of Education Department of Energy Department of Health and Human Services Department of Homeland Security Department of Housing and Urban Development Department of Interior Department of Justice Department of Labor Department of State Department of Transportation Department of the Treasury Department of Veterans Affairs Environmental Protection Agency Federal Emergency Management Agency General Services Administration (GSA) National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Science Foundation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Personnel Management Small Business Administration Social Security Administration

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

And since 1997, Government Accountability Office auditors have disclaimed an opinion on these financial reports due to "material weaknesses" related to bad recordkeeping and reporting. So for 28 STRAIGHT YEARS the government has not been able to account for its financials. https://t.co/noAEitqB2G

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Disclaiming an opinion means the information provided may contain misstatements or omissions and is so untrustworthy on its face that the government's auditors cannot even form an opinion on it. https://t.co/Fj7nly31mk

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Let's talk about the specifics of some of these "material weaknesses". The government can't account for what all it owns and where it is to even be able to report on its assets, most especially those under DOD responsibility — a dept set to receive $961 billion in 2026. https://t.co/sf3neUTQ3i

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Auditors of whole components of the DOD have also disclaimed opinions including the Army, Navy, Air Force, Defense Health Program, Defense Logistics Agency, and Transportation Command. But sure, taxpayers should give them almost a trillion more totally unaccountable dollars. https://t.co/sDu4etFiV5

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Neither the SBA, nor the Dept of Education, can support amounts of loans receivable — that's the amounts they expect to receive from borrowers as repayment for loans they issued! If they can't provide evidence on what is owed, how can they legally expect to be paid back? https://t.co/xjPj0P98Mo

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

They can't substantiate all kinds of liabilities, from Dept of Energy and DOD environmental and disposal liabilities to health benefits for retired federal employees and veterans. On the environmental stuff for example, this would mean these agencies are unable to "determine whether commitments and contingencies were complete and properly reported".

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

This also means the government can't back up what it claims is needed for cost of operations, affecting its ability to reduce costs, assess performance, evaluate programs, etc. — put simply, it can't be expected to be in any way accountable for all the taxes it collects.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

This government continues to be unable to adequately account for intragovernmental activity and balances between federal entities. https://t.co/drMVlVjnJ2

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Sixteen agencies reported improper payments totaling a whopping $162 billion just for FY 2024, most of which was in Medicare, Medicaid, and EIC, and SNAP. But hey, at least this is down from FY2023 which was $236 billion! https://t.co/c9rT0WduWD

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

But that's magically not the same as fraud — fraud amounts which are so massive, our government isn't even able to estimate how many hundreds of billions it is annually. It was somewhere between $233 and $521 billion in 2018–2022 alone. So... who knows? No one, that's who. https://t.co/XJwwN9Clyz

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

In addition to all those "material weaknesses," the IRS has a "significant deficiency" in its ability to "manage its taxes receivable effectively". https://t.co/YtrJXYbDQ6

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Several entities also fail at managing and overseeing federal grants properly — particularly in regard to "monitoring grant activities" which is the whole point of these grants in the first place! https://t.co/TlSWHYA3HC

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

The HHS has errors in the spreadsheets they're using to calculate and estimate Medicare — a program an estimated 68 million Americans in this country rely on for their healthcare. https://t.co/GQtzTNLOty

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Speaking of, the OASI fund that pays Social Security — which over 74 million people rely on — will run out after 2033. The Hospital Insurance fund that pays Medicare will run out in 2036. An additional $78.2 TRILLION is needed to meet projected expenditures here. https://t.co/rvhFYefxN8

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Oh, and this report coldly lists "low-cost alternatives" in its projections for these programs such as "slower improvement in morality (beneficiaries die younger)" like its an incentive. More immigrants and a higher interest rate will also cut these costs it says. Whoo hoo! https://t.co/rJU8YuUUNB

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Laughably, this report ADMITS "the size and complexity of the federal government" continues "to present a formidable management challenge in providing accountability". So a government that was never meant to be this big now says it is too big to be accountable! YA DON'T SAY!!

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

It is SO unbelievably insulting Janet Yellen signed this flaming dumpster fire of a ridiculous excuse for a report by saying it was her "pleasure" to present such a massive joke in accountability to the American people. After all, it is played at our expense quite literally.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Again, no one knows how long this utter lack of accountability has been going on. Because no one can know. This report admits no one knows what the cost of operations is, what loans the SBA and Dept of Ed are owed, how much fraud there is, what the national debt is — NOTHING.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

No amount of tariffs or taxes can possibly pay off a number the government admits it can't even reliably compute, but hey, they're asking you for Paypal and Venmo payments for it anyway! 🤡 https://t.co/Sxo37KMvYZ

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

This is an IQ test.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

JUST IN - U.S. Treasury Department is now accepting Venmo and PayPal payments from those who want to donate money to reduce the nation's $36.7 trillion debt — NYP

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

There's a reason the media barely covers this report (if it even does at all), so here's our video on it and its implications for our future. (Underneath this post is a link to the report itself.) https://t.co/5bX3uiSn4y

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

New Truthstream Video: While everyone's distracted, buried in a report hardly anyone reads the government has admitted no one has any idea what the national debt is — and its own auditors have said it is too big to provide any financial accountability to us. This is so insane. https://t.co/gVUBxkiacw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speakers analyze a Treasury/GAO annual report, focusing on page 215 and the independent auditor's report from the US Government Accountability Office. They quote that "for twenty eight consecutive years now, the Government Accountability Office has been disclaiming opinions about all of this information" and that "we were not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion." They highlight "material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and other limitations on the scope of our work" and that "the federal government is not able to demonstrate the reliability of significant portions of the accompanying accrual based consolidated financial statements." They note weaknesses across DoD, SBA, Education, and environmental liabilities, and that the American Rescue Plan Act 2021 program was "not adequately accounted for." The document also presents "Social Security and Medicare sensitivity analysis" with a "low cost alternative" described as "slower improvement in mortality, beneficiaries die younger." The speakers argue the government's size and complexity impede accountability, that the Federal Reserve is not a government agency, and advocate a "trust game" and a "debt jubilee" to restart.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do we start this video? How do we start this video? Speaker 1: I was gonna ask you that. Speaker 2: Everyone's distracted right now about all this stuff that's going on, and they're fighting amongst themselves. All of that, though And Speaker 1: the list. Speaker 2: The list, which I think is extremely important, the list. I mean, I think if you find out that you're being run by criminals who are blackmailed on both sides of the aisle, it's probably a pretty important thing to know. But behind all of that, there's one thing that well, it's a fact that the government is admitting about itself. And no one reads these reports. And so it's basically like every year they say some of this stuff, and they they admit things, and the media is not doing its job, so it's not gonna tell you this. No nobody's really talking about it. They are, but they're not. They're not showing you in plain language that you could actually see well, I won't say plain language because the way they write these reports is very Speaker 1: It's not that plain. Speaker 2: It actually is mind numbing and obtuse and obscure and vague and done in such a manner that you will actually fall asleep by page two, so you'll never get to page, you know, 215 and actually see what's going on. That's that's what they actually do. But you need to see this for yourself. Need to show this to your friends. They need to see it. You need to go look this up. Read it for yourself too when I'm done here. I'm not gonna read you all 245 pages of this because you will fall asleep. Your brain will liquefy. It might leak out your ears. Speaker 1: Yeah. Everyone talks about the $37,000,000,000,000 debt clock and counting at a crazy rate. It is crazy. It's totally crazy. But then more quietly, they have an annual report from the Treasury Department to Congress on the real government financial condition, which includes drastically more money and unfunded liabilities and other obligations that the federal government has signed on to. You know, this report was put out by Brian McGlinchey of Stark Realities, and it was over on zero hedge. Speaker 2: And it says right here, according to him, that we don't we're not in 37,000,000,000,000 in national debt. You know, everyone got the little debt clock, but that's not that's not true. Actually, according to a barely publicized treasury report, the actual grand total of uncle Sam's obligations is more than 151,000,000,000,000. That's insane. So I thought, I'm gonna go get the actual report though because I wanna see these numbers for myself. I'm one of those people. I like to do that even though I hate reading reports like this because, like I said, they're written in language that's meant to hypnotize you and put you to sleep before any meaningful conclusions can be drawn from what's written in them. And I hate it. And I hate it with a passion. Okay? The fire of a thousand suns. But I did this anyway. And once I started doing it, I realized that there's no way for any of us to actually know anything about any of these numbers being true, real, even remotely close to accurate representations of reality. Nothing. Nothing. Okay? So you need to see this report for yourself. I've highlighted some things. Now it goes straight into this letter from Janet Yellen that was written in January 2025 about how great everything was. They started off on a really positive note about how positive everything is. Inflation's down. Unemployment rates are near historic lows. Economic growth is strong. They say all the the buzz phrases that should make you think that everything is just peachy. And then they start going through the contents and notes and all of this stuff. Right? And it's a lot of charts. It looks like a PowerPoint presentation someone gave in the nineties. It's it's actually really sad that this much money is spent on the government. They can't even write a report that doesn't look like this. But anyway, I figured out, once I started scrolling down there's some pretty crazy stuff in here, but I'm not even gonna get to that because you don't even need to do all of that. What you need to do is go straight to page 215. So that's what we're gonna do. We're gonna go straight to page 215 because this is what you actually need to know. Because you'll you'll read all this other stuff. You'll see all these charts. You'll be like, this is very official looking. All of these numbers, all of these bullet points, all of these figures, blah blah blah, all this talking, all these words, all this semantic house of cards. But if you get down in here Speaker 1: You're talking about page two zero eight, but the PDF is page two fifteen. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. It's on the page written is two zero eight. But if you type in the page number at the sidebar, it'll be two fifteen. Yes. Thank you for clarifying that. But this is where you will come upon the independent auditor's report from the US Government Accountability Office. This is what you actually need to see. Alright? Because for twenty eight consecutive years now, the Government Accountability Office has been disclaiming opinions about all of this information that's in this report for twenty eight years. What does that mean? It means that the auditors are unable to obtain sufficient information, evidence, data to even express an opinion on what is being communicated in this report, let alone to actually audit or evaluate any of it, which suggests that the reliability of the information contained in this report is basically nonexistent. There isn't any because they do not have any faith whatsoever in the information that is being presented. That is what that means to disclaim an opinion, and they've been doing that now since at least 1997. In fact, I found this press release from 2006 on the US Government Accountability Office that says US financial statements received disclaimer of opinion for tenth straight year. So at least going back to '19 well, in the report, it says '97. At least going back to 1997, they the auditors of the government accountability office have not been able to do their job really. Speaker 1: Okay. But this report required by congress has only been law since 1994. That's twenty eight years out of thirty one years total. Thirty, thirty one years depending on when the first one came out. Exactly. So it's pretty much the whole time. Speaker 2: The whole time, guys. That's what I'm saying. So you need to see this part of the report because this is the level we're actually at, and nobody's really like, everyone knows, like, the budget's not balanced. Everyone knows we're in horrible debt. But you need to actually see what that actually means in in when it's spelled out by the one office we're supposed to have that the whole purpose of it existing is accountability. Okay? So here's what those people are saying. It says, in our audits of the US government's consolidated financial statements as of and for fiscal years ended 09/30/2024 and 2023, we found the following. Certain material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and other limitations on the scope of our work resulted in conditions that continued to prevent us from expressing an opinion on the accompanying accrual based consolidated financial statements for those years. Now they use this phrase material weaknesses, which I think is a really fun semantics game they're playing, and that is defined down here in a footnote. And you need to see that because they use it over and over and over again. So you need to know what that means. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a misstatement of financial statements will not be prevented. And and even describing this is convoluted passive voice euphemisms instead of just telling you what it actually says. In plain language, what this means is the way that they are keeping their financial records is so fundamentally flawed that there's a reasonable possibility that the stuff in here is not true. Material misstatement. The way they're doing this is so flawed that the information that's being reported is probably not correct. That's basically what that says. It says that a deficiency in internal control exists when a designer operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions to prevent, detect, and correct misstatements on a timely basis. So in other words, material weakness means they don't have good data. They cannot trust these figures. They cannot trust these anything that's being reported is what that means. If they say there's a material weakness, that's essentially what that means. It means there's no accountability. You can't match up what are, in some cases in this report, billions of dollars in transactions. Speaker 1: I mean, when you put this into perspective, back in nineteen ninety four, ninety three, ninety four, congress is far from perfect, but basically, they mandated that the treasury give them an annual report of all the real facts because after all, constitutionally, it's congress that's supposed to have power of the purse and the funding even though the treasury department is under the executive branch. So when that legislation became law in '94, the result of it was a treasury department report that says, actually, the dog ate my homework. These numbers are no good. There was water spilled on this. I can't read this number. We've got inspector generals who are out with stomachaches today. And so, basically, none of these numbers are real, and you can't rely on anyone. So there's your information, congress. Good luck balancing the budget or being accountable to the people in any way. We're an executive branch. Speaker 2: Exactly. That's what this is like. Speaker 1: It's a it's a problem that goes all the way back to the founding of the country. It's a problem that popped up with Doge and Elon Musk even, you know, playing his side Speaker 2: of it. Anything at all, basically. Speaker 1: Not that I'm endorsing his side of it either. I'm just saying to the extent that congress ever expressed an intent to properly manage fiscal matters and even just have knowledge and disclosure of the money, it was pretty much obfuscated. Speaker 2: So it starts with the material weaknesses, which prevent them from expressing an opinion about or being able to audit at all because there's just the data is so bad. Then it says it says material weaknesses resulted in ineffective internal control over financial reporting for fiscal year twenty twenty four, and material weaknesses and other scope limitations, limited tests of compliance with selected provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements for fiscal year twenty twenty four. So, basically, none of this information that's contained in this report is trustworthy. And the further you scroll down in here, they lay it all out. They say, because of the significance of the related matters described in the basis for their disclaimer of opinion, we were not able to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion. We were not yeah. That's what they keep saying. Then it says, the federal government is not able to demonstrate the reliability of significant portions of the accompanying accrual based consolidated financial statements as of and for fiscal years ended 09/30/2024 and 2023, principally because of the limitations related to certain material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and other limitations affecting the reliability of these statements and the scope of our work. The federal government did not maintain adequate systems or have sufficient appropriate evidence to support certain material information reported in these statements. The underlying material weaknesses, blah blah blah, specifically concern the federal government's inability to satisfactorily determine that property, plant, and equipment, and inventories, and related property primarily held by the Department of Defense were properly reported, reasonably estimate the value of loans receivable and loan guarantees, most notably at the Small Business Administration and the Department of Education. So they don't really know about that. They don't they can't reasonably estimate the value of loans and loan guarantees at the Department of Education. You know, the loans that they're getting all of us to fight with each other over, they don't know. Okay? The government does not even know. Says they cannot reasonably estimate or adequately support amounts reported for certain liabilities, such as environmental and disposal liabilities and things like nuclear cleanup and stuff like that, or determine whether commitments and contingencies were complete and properly reported. Cannot support significant portions of the reported total net cost of operations, most notably related to the Department of Defense, the Small Business Association, the Department of Education, and security assistance accounts, and adequately reconcile disbursement activity at certain federal entities cannot adequately account for intragovernmental activity and balances between federal entities cannot reasonably assure that the consolidated financial statements are, one, consistent with the underlying audited entities financial statements, two, properly balanced. They can't assure these are properly balanced. Okay? And three, in accordance with The US generally accepted accounting principles, They cannot reasonably assure that the information in the reconciliations of net operating cost and budget deficit and the statements of changes in cash balance from budget and other activities is complete, properly supported, and consistent with the underlying information in the audited entities' financial statements and other financial data. Then it says, these material weaknesses, that is lack of any data that's reliable at all, continue to, number one, hamper the federal government's ability to reliably report a significant portion of its assets, liabilities, costs, and other related information. Number two, affect the federal government's ability to reliably measure the full cost as well as financial and nonfinancial performance of government programs and activities. Number three, impair the federal government's ability to adequately safeguard significant assets and properly record various transactions. And four, hinder the federal government from having reliable, useful, and timely financial information to operate effectively and efficiently. Period. Like, that is what this says. Okay? Speaker 1: So junk in, junk out. I mean, if you never have reliable numbers, you can't make a reliable assessment, and you've got inspectors general not even properly reporting. If they're even appointed, that's become a growing problem. Inspector general's not even appointed for Speaker 2: Well, what's the point of having one? Because they're not turning in reports, then the reports they are turning in don't have any data in them that actually is based on factual reality in any kind of conceivable way. Speaker 1: They they expect every single American household to have an exact accounting of all their finances throughout the year, a portion. Meanwhile, we're used to the the post World War two period being filled with black budgets. You know, the Department of Defense, the military, the CIA, and all these special secret They operate on a black budget. You never find the bottom of it, and they're funding proxy wars and carrying out secret wars that are immensely expensive. It's a terrible problem for our system of government, but we're we're accustomed to that. But, basically, what this report boils down to is that the entire federal government operates on a black budget. Speaker 2: Basically, yes. That is it. You've just hit the nail on the head because they don't know Speaker 1: And that's before you get into the Federal Reserve printing the money. Speaker 2: Like, that's the other thing. Congress cannot possibly do its job. It's not even possible for congress to that's before you get into, like, should they be allowed to insider trade, which, of course, they totally are and they don't care how corrupt they look and all that stuff. None of these numbers they're getting mean anything. They don't mean anything. That's what this is. It's all an illusion. Speaker 1: And it's clear that the Federal Reserve is not a government agency. They're not accountable. They certainly don't submit an audit report. And if they did, it would be as blank as this one. Speaker 2: Pretty much. Speaker 1: But they're accountable to no one. They manipulate things. They print at will. They all get a percentage. Their shareholders profit. We can't know any of that. We can't even know who the shareholders are. But then in as much as the Federal Reserve to a degree services the US federal government and the treasury, we can't even get basic numbers on those expenditures and account items. Speaker 2: We can't. Speaker 1: It's insane. Speaker 2: We don't have anything. And it actually even goes on to say that in addition, the government did not adequately account for or report the entire special financial assistance program that they did under the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021. So all that COVID stuff, they were they didn't report or account for any of it. They didn't do they just whatever. They just did stuff and whatever. All this inflation that we've seen, all this stuff that has happened since. Financially, they did not account for and report any of the stuff they did with that whole special financial assistance program thing they did. There's just nothing there. And it says that this program is supposed to provide payments to eligible multi employer pension plans, enabling them to pay benefits at plan levels through 2051. That's what this says. And that plans are not required to repay amounts received from this program, which they did not adequately account for or report on. So there's that. There's just there's just another thing, I guess. Whatever. And then as you get down here, they straight up say, as a result of the significant uncertainties and material weaknesses, readers are cautioned. Like, if anyone even reads this report down here to this page all the way towards the end, readers are cautioned that this page, which is March '12 but is 02/2019 in the program, readers are cautioned that amounts reported in the 2024 and 2023 statements of long term projections, the 2024, 23, 22, 21, and 20 statements of social insurance, which is how that directly affects a lot of people's millions of people's lives, the 2024 and 2023 statements of changes in social insurance amounts and related notes to these financial statements may not fairly present in all material aspects the sustainability information for those years in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles. So in other words, because we have bad data, we can't give you an audit or report on even what's going on right now. We also can't project long term future anything. We can't project anything. We have no estimates that really mean anything. That is what that basically says. We're making these fiscal projections based on basically nothing. That's what it says. I'm gonna scroll down. I'm not gonna read all of this because like I said, it just gets really tedious and repetitive, but you you should at least go read these 30 pages for yourself just to see for yourself that it's all right here in black and white. Other limitations on the scope of our work. For the fiscal years of 2024 and '23, there were other limitations on the scope of the government accountability office auditors. The additional limitations primarily relate to obtaining adequate representations from management regarding the financial statements. Now that is a really nice way of saying we couldn't get anyone to vouch for the the reports that they gave us to to audit. We couldn't get any of these people in management of these government agencies to vouch, okay, for the for the data they're giving us. Speaker 1: The government is fundamentally unaccountable in some very basic and key ways. Speaker 2: I mean, you you turn in these reports. You gotta have someone that signs off on it and says, you know, this information is correct. You know how they make you sign that stuff all the time in your own life. I swear that, you know, this info is true to the best of my knowledge and that nothing important is being hidden or, you know, has been manipulated or whatever. Right? But they said they're saying here they couldn't get adequate representations from management regarding the financial statements. That means that they didn't get good assurance that what's here is not weak or missing information. Speaker 1: It means is that the executive branch Speaker 2: do the job. Speaker 1: They nominally complied with congress's requirement by saying, well, we can't really guarantee these numbers since we never got good numbers, but here's your report. Speaker 2: It's like you could just get AI to write, like, some big long report. It doesn't mean that it means anything, and that's what this is. It's a big long report filled with lots of, you know, graphs and charts that look like they were made in freaking, I don't know, PowerPoint presentation in the mid nineties, and they don't mean anything. Then it's a ahead. No. You go ahead. Speaker 1: No. You go ahead. Speaker 2: No. You go ahead. Speaker 1: I mean, what it boils down to is the debt we think we know, which is bad enough and already staggering, pales in comparison to to the obligations this government has made, and we don't know the real numbers. Speaker 2: We don't know what they are. Speaker 1: No one can know the It real is not knowable. It's worse than a house of cards because it's as if there aren't even cards. Yeah. Okay? But the one thing they are sure about is that they made a lot of social obligations, especially for Medicare and Social Security, I e the one department of the federal government's largest that directly impacts and potentially benefits actual people of this country. Speaker 3: When Social Security was first founded, those who established it, it was started out as a 2% tax, and they said this will never take more than 6% of your income. Today, it takes 12.4%. And depending on whether you go with CBO or Social Security trustees, needs to take between 15.817.5%. So we're talking about thousands of dollars more per year. It also was actually only originally recommended that the tax be up to $66,000 equivalent in today's dollars of earnings. But over time, it has expanded massively and the money has been spent every year. So whereas everybody thinks this money has been set aside for me. No, for the past thirteen years, every dollar that has gone out of workers' paychecks has gone immediately to pay promised benefits. And that's what happens when you have a system that enables those in charge of it to spend the money in the immediate term and leave the buck to the next generation that's coming along. Since he just brought up the Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, because I Speaker 2: think that's what a lot of people are super focused on because there are a lot of people who that's their whole way of life is based upon that being a thing that exists. But they're basically saying in here that we've got maybe eight years we got less than a decade left of that program having the funds to even pay for it. And, again, that's if you could even go off these numbers, which, like I said, they cannot. They cannot go off of these numbers. But there's some really creepy, ethically disturbing things that have been written in this report, and I'm not gonna get into all of that. You can go look it for yourself. But an example of what I mean by that, you can find on the bottom of page one seventy nine under Social Security and Medicare sensitivity analysis. I'm going to the very last paragraph here at the bottom under that header. It says the following tables show the present values of the estimated excess of Social Security and Medicare costs over income for the seventy five year period using various assumptions with which are shown in parentheses. And then it says the low cost alternative is characterized by assumptions that improve the financial status of the program relative to the intermediate assumption, such as slower improvement in mortality, parentheses, beneficiaries die younger. Basically, they put that in there as a best case scenario. So the cold hard facts of this document as a financial document, which they just admitted in the government accountability section shows you they can't go on these numbers anyways, but they have outlined in here that a low cost alternative, as they call it, is that there is slower improvement in mortality, parentheses, beneficiaries die younger. So Speaker 1: It's stunning. Speaker 2: From a purely fiscal standpoint, which is how this is written, that is what they are saying. On the next page is the chart, and then underneath that chart, it says, the average annual reduction in death rates. If people die at younger ages, Social Security income relative to cost would decrease by $5,100,000,000,000. But if they live longer, the shortfall would increase by $6,000,000,000,000. Speaker 1: Basically, anyone who cares about this finance has a vested interest in hoping people die as soon as possible so they don't have to pay them programs they promised them and that many people are counting on, which are nonetheless unconstitutional programs. But this country got hooked on FDR related programs and other social programs. It's it's a total departure from the constitution and the way this country was set up. Speaker 4: By by the way, Social Security, for those of you who don't know, this group up here in 1983 voted to tax Social Security. And then a few years later, tax it again. It's all a scam. This is all a scam. I mean, we got people that's getting ready to retire that's gonna try to live off 2 to $3,000. Impossible. It's impossible Because what happens, it comes up here, we spend it. We're 35,000,000,000,000 in debt. We don't have any money. We're dead broke. Speaker 1: But by way of funny money, real people's lives, real people who actually exist Speaker 2: is affecting us. Like, it's Speaker 1: affecting everyone. This fake money, money that's so fake, they can't even admit to congress how much money it even is. Speaker 2: Then it straight up admits on page two eighteen. Admits, okay, long standing financial management system weaknesses at several large CFO Act agencies along with the size and complexity of the federal government, which was never ever supposed to be this gargantuan, leviathan, octopus system that it has become. It was never supposed to be like this under the framework of the constitution. This is not how things are supposed to be at all. It blames the size and complexity of the federal government as continuing to present a formidable management challenge in providing accountability and contribute significantly to material weaknesses and limitations that are discussed in this audit report. So they're admitting to you right there, ladies and gentlemen, that this government is too big for them to even financially manage it all, let alone have any accountability whatsoever. Speaker 1: Too big to even account for even internally, much less for people to lobby their representatives to politely ask the deep state to please, you know, reduce the programs or be more reasonable. It's so out of control, even the people in government can't account for how large, complex, and expensive it is. Speaker 2: No. Have you seen the memes? It's like for a millennial, my retirement plan is societal collapse. People are making like, they're they're, like, sewing little pillows that say that and putting them on their couch because that's the level we're at. We all know this isn't gonna be here for us and anyone coming up after us. Speaker 1: Well, meanwhile, the aging boomers of of all our families, everyone you know Speaker 2: They're reliant on generation. Lot of people that are reliant on this, Speaker 1: They're relying on Speaker 2: pay any bills without this. Speaker 1: I mean, some people have their own personal investments and retirement funds, but for a lot of people, this is basically all they got. Speaker 2: This is Speaker 1: And that money is running out, what, less than a decade? Yes. Maybe it already has Speaker 2: a run. Changing it in here. Actually, may have good. Different years. Speaker 1: All we know, it 100% ran out. You know it can go. We don't even know the Speaker 2: real numbers. They they're not even printing money anymore. They're just moving digits around on a screen somewhere. Like, this it doesn't it's not connected to reality in any possible way. That is what this says. Speaker 4: And then taxpayers have $2,000,000,000,000 in credit card debt. We are in huge trouble. In this body, we had better start figuring that out because we're gonna have a run on this city here soon, and there's gonna be about a 150,000,000 people coming up here saying, where's our damn money that we paid in? Speaker 1: So between the lines of this report, it, first of all, says the executive branch is not gonna tell the elected congress any real information. Second, it says this is a bursting bubble that's gonna be a huge financial problem, and there's basically three or four main routes on how that could be handled. One is the government near default may just simply fail to fulfill its obligations and wouldn't pay out. Two, they print money. They print more and more money like they do for every crisis from Federal Reserve, lend it to the treasury at interest, and then give it to these programs through a system that will create insane hyperinflation, and then basically there would be some form of economic collapse, all of which, you know, the pain and burden of it would fall on us ordinary people. Another thing they could do is sell government bonds to get ordinary people and institutional investors to loan them the money to pay for this. However, at least the institutional investors and those who are wise in the financial area know how risky it is for the government that can't afford its own program, so they're demanding higher interest rates to pay back for those bonds, which in some cases have already outstripped the debt that they're trying to fulfill. Okay? The final leg of that chair, which is not gonna stand, is reducing the number of beneficiaries that they promised to pay out by shortening their lifespan, which Speaker 2: the mentioned in here. Speaker 1: Which is the eugenical front of this. And, you know, where does this show up in everyday society? Which crises of the past several years? Speaker 2: Yeah. Can you think of anything that's happened in the last five years that was real weird, didn't make a whole lot of sense? I I don't know. It's kind of hard. Like, what what was that that happened that was very strange? And everyone's like, why would that be the case? Speaker 1: There are people quite literally banking on the shortening of life. It's disgusting. It's disgusting. That is what is on the table. Economics that don't compute. Math that not only doesn't work, but math that can't work because they don't even have the proper inputs. Speaker 2: This is so incredibly ins insolvent. There's no this is like that part of a cartoon where they're driving a car that's, like, already junking out down the hill, and the parts just all start flying off. And by the time the cartoon character gets to the bottom of the hill, every single part of the car is gone and and the character's just basically sitting in a chair with a steering wheel. That's what's going on. That's what's actually going on, and people are paying taxes to this. People are paying taxes to this, and that's what they're doing. In fact, they just released a new thing where you can Venmo or PayPal the government to pay down the debt. They're trying to get people to send them PayPal pay payments on this, and they're not even accountable to what it is because nobody actually knows. You can't say it's 37,000,000,000,000. You can't say it's a 151,000,000,000,000. It's probably something even way more asinine than any of us could even know. It's insane. This is insane. You can't run anything this way. It's not possible. It's not possible to balance this or fix it. There's no doge that's gonna come in and, like, fix this. You can't do anything with it at all. Okay? And what's even scarier about this is, like I said, this has been going on for twenty eight consecutive years now on record. So all of the data they've been feeding into AI, if it's this kind of data at all in any possible way, AI can't fix this either. All that promise about AI is gonna come in and run this and fix it, that's not that's not gonna happen either. It's not possible because all you're doing is feeding this complete bullshit data into a system so it can give you complete bullshit numbers and complete bullshit projections that are basically worthless, as worthless as this report is, the whole thing. It's just I'm not gonna keep reading this report, actually. Like, we we recorded a whole hour of talking about this report, and go read this for yourself. Go get this report. I'm gonna put the link below. Type in the number two fifteen. Go to that page and just read through some of the stuff that they admit to, that they admit what pisses me off about this. K? Because we've all known for a long I think we've all let's let's be adults in the room. Okay? Because these people obviously are not. All of you out there know. You have been having to cut costs in your own house. You've had to worry about what's gonna happen. Probably been taking on some debt. A lot of people taking on some debt. We're all out here struggling. K? I was at the grocery store earlier tonight, and there were half eaten containers of food that had been eaten while people were walking around the store and just being left around the store. I've lived here since 2021. I've never seen that before. People are struggling. We were in Dallas last week, and I saw a woman just walking down the street with no clothes on. The the amount of craziness that is happening in the streets of our country and the things that are going on and the amount of suffering, pure suffering that is occurring in our country right now is unbelievable to watch while these people are sitting up here writing reports like this. There is absolutely zero accountability in this report. None. It is a joke that is being played on everybody. It is an illusion. It is fiction. There is nothing here. It's a bag of nothing. That is what this report is. And I could go through and read you all the little specifics like I normally do in these videos and say, look at all this and this and this and this. We could be here for an hour and a half, or you can just go get this and look at it for yourself, and you'll see what I mean. Even people who are trying to say, oh, it's actually the unfunded liabilities bring it up to a 151,000,000,000,000 or something like that. Whatever. There's no way to know that. There is no way to know that that is the actual number. There's no way to know. It's probably way worse. And I don't even know how it could be that much because supposedly the entire the total debt of the entire global debt of the whole world is 315,000,000,000,000. How could how could it be a 151 just here? Do you see? Like, that math doesn't add up either. I bet all the numbers across this place are all phony. I wanna bet you. How much you wanna bet that this right here is just what we're seeing here, and this is being replicated everywhere? What do you wanna bet? This entire thing, like he said, it's not even a house of cards because there's not even cards. It is a game, though, and it's definitely being played on everybody. There is there's no this is not our debt. Okay? This is not our debt. It's not mine. It's not yours. You didn't do this. This is unaccountable, just total highway I don't even not even highway robbery because it's all made up, printed, fake, nothing. It's based on nothing. They could change it at will. They could always print more money. Remember what Greenspan said? The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default. So this is ridiculous, but the rest of us are supposed to all live under some kind of slavery to this. Right? And and of course, no one's having kids in the younger generation. Do you think they wanna bring more slaves into this? Are you kidding? Of course not. No. Why would they? It makes no sense. Alright? So that's why. They're looking around like, what what what is the point, and what can we tell them? What can we in the older generations tell them? I'm a millennial. What can I tell them? What can I say? Speaker 1: Once they passed a modest reporting law, they suddenly couldn't come up with the numbers. But when it's time to ask for the money and demand the budgets, they got numbers all day long. Die. Yeah. This gets back to some of the John Locke stuff you were you were talking about from last week. Natural law. This is our government. This is our system. We're supposed to be loyal at least to the ideas and principles of the constitution, maybe not to the government itself, but the government is supposed to serve those ends. And yet it's so predatory and so dismissive and devaluing of life. How are we any better off than living in the jungle? The most primitive societies you could think of took care of their elders. They looked after people. Maybe lives were supposedly nasty, short, and brutish, but at least they didn't have some bureaucracy weighing over them and, like, scaling their life, not on their deeds, not on the things they had done or what they represent, but on cold, hard cash, whatever that is. Speaker 2: Like, this is insane. There is no no responsibility here. So what you're watching when you watch congress have these arguments with each other about whether or not they can insider trade or not. They're completely unaccountable. Completely unaccountable to us. Completely unaccountable to the everything that they're supposed to be doing. There's no way for them to be because these numbers are completely made up. None of this is real. That is what this report says over and over and over. So I don't know what else you need to see to understand the level that things are at, But they're openly admitting it because they don't think anyone's even going to read it. Okay? They don't. And they're paying influencers now to keep people infighting about all of this other bullshit. And guess what? None of it even really matters. It doesn't. Like I said, if anything, the only reason they're trying to bring back up Epstein now and because they don't ever plan to tell on themselves. None of these people plan to tell on themselves. The only reason they bring it back up now is to get people to demand this stuff be accountable so that then if they decide to use it as an excuse to collapse everything, they could put this under the collapse, and then they don't have to take responsibility for any of this. This right here that you are seeing will never be fixed from inside of here. It is not possible. There's no way, and they admit it in here. In the report, they admit that the size of this leviathan thing makes it impossible. There aren't enough tariffs in the world to pay off whatever's really going on here, and there is absolutely zero reason that anyone, any one of us in America should believe that any of the money that's being raised by tariffs is actually going to pay what this is since they don't even know what it actually is, and it's probably in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. This has probably been going on for a very, very, very long time, way longer than just twenty eight years, if I had to guess. But there's no amount of anything that is going to fix this. No amount of budget cutting, no amount of tariffs, no amount of raising taxes on us all, and there is no reason to trust that any of that money from tariffs or taxes or anything at all in any way is actually going to pay this or going towards where they say it's going. Why would you trust them with that? They're not accountable on at any level, so why would you trust that they'll be accountable with that? There is absolute trust is earned. Trust is earned. That is why we called the entire series on our monetary system that we made the trust game because that's what this is. There's no reason to trust anything that we are being told about this. Any budgets that they're calling for, any amounts they say are going to happen in the future, It's all based on phony numbers to begin with, so you can't arrive at a conclusion that is also anything other than phony. And the people who are in there suckling at the teat of this and benefiting off of this total fraud and complete and utter unaccountability for hundreds of billions of dollars, which is probably more in the trillions and probably, like, insane amounts of trillions, they're never gonna fix this. Not ever. Not even if they even wanted to. Like, if there's someone in there who wants to. Right? Not gonna happen. Sorry. You can't you can't fix this. The only way this gets fixed is if we go back to the founding principles of this country, the limited government that we were supposed to have in the beginning, and you clean house. Those people all need to be fired. None of them should be there because they're not gonna fix this. They're not gonna fix this. They can't fix it. This is not fixable. This is unaccountability at every level. I don't know what else to keep saying. I've been saying stuff for thirteen years, and I don't know what else to say. This is where we are. And I'm sorry that all of these levels of people out here are so busy thinking about their own personal situation and their own benefit off of that that they are too afraid to tell you that. I'm afraid too. I'm afraid for all of us. When I saw this, I was like, oh my god. This is insane. How can anything be so bad? It is so bad. But I'm more afraid of what happens if none of us admit this to ourselves and this does not change at all for the better because this is gonna affect everybody. This affects everybody. So I would say that's the reason we're talking about moving everything into some technocracy thing. It will not be legitimate. Everything they got now, they try to roll it into some AI system, that will all be bunk. All of it. All of it. Because you can't put any of this in there. All of this data is bad. You're gonna put bad data in there. You're gonna get bad data back out again. They're gonna start a whole new system based on bad data built into the foundations of the system. It will only go down from there. You have to have a zero. You have to have a debt jubilee zero start over because there is no way you can continue on with this charade. It is a charade. That is all it is. There is nothing there. I don't know how many more times I can say it. I'm just repeating myself, but I just everybody needs to understand this. I stayed up reading this all night last night because I just couldn't I couldn't I couldn't believe how completely and utterly just bereft of any type of legitimacy this is. This is the most illegitimate thing I have ever seen. Speaker 1: The only thing you need to know is this page was intentionally left blank. Speaker 0: I love you guys. I think we should probably cut this off. Do you Speaker 2: have anything else you wanna say? Speaker 1: I love you too. Take care of yourself and your loved ones as best you can because this government can't take care of you, and it won't take care of you. And the technocrats coming up on the next version of that system, I can't say I have any faith in it Yeah. Speaker 2: Exactly.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

P.S. – https://t.co/9kIVTzTtGs

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

@mattbroadstreet It is for everyone. 🫡 This affects us all. https://t.co/kI4oS5C8CV

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

@p_m_dahmen We were sent the article from Zero Hedge which linked to Brian McGlinchey's Stark Realities which linked to the report.

truthstreamnews
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 7:07 AM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 7:25 PM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

It's like Americans are being held hostage in the past by someone's great-grandparents who don’t even know what century it is or what basic words mean. This is so incredibly embarrassing for every single person in this country. https://t.co/rSSPcCdjG1

Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke with a manufacturing company that's trying to get young people involved in the field. I was curious about female participation, so I asked about the percentage of women in their programs. They estimated it was around 13%, which seems low. I wonder if the term "manufacturing" itself sounds inherently masculine, potentially deterring women from entering the industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, I met with a manufacturing company, but they also are engaged in getting young people more engaged in manufacturing. So I asked them, so how many of those students that are signing up and wanna do this, how many are women? And they said, well, there, I know there's at least, 13% or something. It was a a low number. And you had mentioned trying to engage more women in manufacturing. I'm I'm just wondering if just the name manufacturing sounds like a guy.
truthstreamnews
Posted - November 1, 2024 at 11:34 PM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 7:00 PM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

But without tyrannical government, who would send a multitude of officers to your animal rescue to protect you by confiscating and euthanizing your famous pet squirrel Peanut? https://t.co/2vdVL6TpI9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Feeding 71 rescue horses, I was interrupted by 6 to 8 DEC officers who presented a warrant for a squirrel and a raccoon. They searched my property for five hours, eventually finding Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon. I was in the process of obtaining legal ownership for Peanut as an educational animal. Taking Peanut not only affects my family but also our nonprofit, Peanut's Freedom Farm, which started because of him. I rescued Peanut seven years ago after his mother was killed. He never developed survival instincts and was attacked, leading me to let him live indoors. Peanut became famous online, gaining 3 million followers across social media, which I believe prompted the complaint. It’s shocking that such resources were used against a nonprofit animal rescue, treating us like criminals over a squirrel and a raccoon.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feeding all of our 71 rescue horses at our nonprofit animal rescue. Midway through that, a line of DEC officers, about 6 to 8 of them, showed up and, gave me a warrant for a squirrel and a raccoon. Speaker 1: The search warrant said Longo was in unlawful possession of wildlife. He says agents ransacked his property for 5 hours until they found Peanut and Fred the raccoon. Speaker 0: We complied. We weren't allowed to move. We were police escorted into the bathroom. Room. Mind you, this is a search warrant for a squirrel and a raccoon, and I feel like this was a little bit of an overkill. Speaker 1: Longo says he was working on the necessary paperwork to be able to legally own Peanut as an educational animal. Speaker 0: You're not only hurting my family by taking Peanut away from me, but you're also hurting the organization that we started on the back of a a rescue squirrel. We named this organization Peanut's Freedom Farm because he has been such a big portion of my life and so many people around the world. You know, we promoted the fact that squirrels are not good pets. They don't deserve to be inside, but there are rare occasions where you stumble on an animal that unfortunately can't survive in their normal habitat. That's the only reason why Peanut was ever a rescue animal. Speaker 1: Longo says he rescued Peanut 7 years ago in New York City after the squirrel's mom was hit by a car. He says he rehabbed Peanut and tried to release him into his backyard. But Longo says Peanut never developed the instincts to survive outside. After Peanut was attacked by an animal and lost half his tail, Longo let Peanut live in his home. Speaker 0: But then he became best friends with my cat. So that's when we turned to social media. We put some funny and silly videos out there, and the Internet loved him. He became the world's most famous squirrel. Speaker 1: Peanut racked up a combined 3,000,000 followers on TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram. Longo says he believes Peanut's fame led to someone filing a complaint. Speaker 0: I'm no expert in anything involving politics or the state, but they sent 6 to 8 officers to my house from Albany to confiscate a squirrel and a raccoon, and it was signed off on a search warrant. So just that that in its sense to say that is one of the most, I I shocking things I could say in my opinion, is we just use resources and spent an entire day sitting to people who run a nonprofit animal rescue and treat them like criminal.
truthstreamnews
Posted - October 21, 2024 at 10:07 PM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 6:08 AM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

I’m voting for this guy. https://t.co/i9pseXZwkU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, I'm Gil Fulbright. This campaign isn't really about me; it's about creating a version of me that appeals to you. I spend most of my time raising funds for reelection, not listening to constituents or legislating. I could change my name to anything to please my donors because staying in office is my priority. So, come November, the choice is clear: do you want another spineless mouthpiece for special interests and lobbyists, or another spineless mouthpiece for special interests and lobbyists? I'm Philip Amalf with Farts, and I approve this message.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Gil Fulbright. The people who run my campaign, they've made this commercial, and I'm in it. This campaign, it's not about me. It's about crafting a version of me that'll appeal to you. A version that visits random work sites with paid actors pointing at things. A version of me that doesn't find old people loathsome or pointless has a conventionally attractive yet curiously still family. Listening to my constituents, legislating, these are things I don't do. What I do is spend about 70% of my time raising funds for reelection. I'd do anything to stay in office. My name's Gil Fulbright, but, hell, I'll change my name to Phil Goldbright or Bill Fulbright or fill up my mouth with hearts. These are the things that are important to me, and these are the fine people that finance my campaign. Now in order to do these things, I have to stay in office. And to stay in office, I have to keep these guys happy. Now if any of these things make these guys unhappy, well, my hands are tied. So come November, the choice is clear. Do you want another spineless mouthpiece for special interest in lobbyists or a spineless mouthpiece for special interest in lobbyists? I'm Philip Amalf with Farts, and I approve this message.
truthstreamnews
Posted - May 10, 2024 at 9:52 PM
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 3:26 PM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

This Apple commercial for the new iPad Pro aimed at artists pissed them off so much the company had to issue an apology for its existence. Not sure why they set out to terrorize everyone like this, but the Cher backing track def makes the horror of it so much worse. https://t.co/i7calMErrD

truthstreamnews
Posted - October 10, 2023 at 1:34 PM
Saved - October 10, 2023 at 10:40 PM

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

Flashback: Patrick Clawson of think tank WINEP says the quiet part out loud on exactly how America goes to war. “Crisis initiation is really tough... so if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war.” (c. 2012)

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is difficult for the United States to initiate a crisis and go to war with Iran. If compromise is not possible, the traditional way for America to go to war would be in the best interest of the country. Historical examples show that events like Pearl Harbor, the Lusitania episode, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the explosion of the USS Maine, and the attack on Fort Sumter led to the US entering wars. Therefore, if Iran does not compromise, it would be preferable for someone else to start the war.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crisis initiation is really tough, and it's very hard for me to see how the United States, President can get us to war with Iran. Which leads me to conclude that if in fact compromise is not coming, that the traditional way of America gets to war is what would be best for US interests. Some people might think that mister Roosevelt wanted to get us into World War 2. As David mentioned, you may recall we had to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think mister Wilson wanted to get us into World War One, you may recall he had to wait for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that mister Johnson wanted to send troops Vietnam, you may recall, we had to wait for the Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn't go to war with Spain until the USS, Dutch of the Maine exploded. And may I point out that mister Lincoln did not feel he could call out the Federal Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that thing which the South Carolinians had said would cause an attack. So if in fact, the Iranians aren't gonna compromise, It would be best if somebody else started the war.
View Full Interactive Feed