TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @truthtroll_X
reSee.it AI Summary
I present reasons I’ve seen cited for how Hitler rose to power: 1) The unfair Versailles Treaty, fuelling hostility and persecution of Germans in lost territories after WWI. 2) Weimar Germany described as sleaze and degeneracy, echoed in Western nations today. 3) Sources cited: @CanadaManifest1 and @GoUncensored. 4) A claim that some believe their Messiah requires the deaths of 6 million Jews to return, accusing them of deceiving God.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
A couple of the many reasons why Hitler came to power in Germany: 1. The highly unfair Versailles Treaty. Which led to the invasion of Poland where Germans who lived in areas that were lost during World War I were severely persecuted. For education/historical purposes only 1/3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The summary presents a narrative of post-World War I consequences and the asserted motivations behind Germany’s behavior, focusing on the Versailles Treaty and its aftermath. It claims that the Versailles Treaty was imposed due to internal unrest caused by “Jewish communists,” and that Germany, despite not starting the war, lost it. It states that all major countries aimed to start a war for advancement of power, and it lists German losses: 1.8 million soldiers died and 4.2 million were wounded.
The account describes the reparations and postwar constraints as punitive. It notes that to force Germany to accept the terms, the British Navy conducted a blockade that “starved to death 750,000 German civilians.” The conditions of the treaty are itemized: 13% of German territory with 7,300,000 Germans living there; reparations totaling 132,000,000,000 Reichsmarks (with the exchange rate given as one mark equal to 50 cents); loss of 67% of zinc production and 75% of iron ore; decrements in agricultural and industrial capacity including 1,000,000 cattle, 7,500 locomotives, 200,000 freight cars; removal of the army, navy, merchant ships, and colonies. The text asserts that Britain threatened to extend the blockade and invade if terms were not accepted.
The narrative then states that France invaded the Ruhr region in 1923, noting that the Ruhr produced 80% of Germany’s coal and steel. It uses a metaphor—“Imagine a man who shoots you in the leg and then tells you to run a marathon and if you can't you'll get shot again”—to describe the relationship between the Allies and Germany after World War I. It contends that Germany could not physically fulfill the demands.
The passage argues that the situation was not about fair reparations but about slavery and presents Germany as facing two choices: accept slavery or rise to power. It claims Germany understood its enemy was acting in its power interests, not democracy, human rights, or peace. Consequently, Germany decided to pursue its own power interests.
In sum, the text presents a viewpoint that attributes the harsh postwar settlement to punitive Allied aims rooted in power rather than justice, asserts the blockade and territorial losses were intolerable pressures, and frames Germany’s subsequent stance as a calculated response to an adversary acting in self-interest, culminating in a claim that Germany chose to pursue power as an alternative to “slavery.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Real Reich. The Versailles Treaty, due to internal unrest caused by Jewish communists, Germany lost World War I. The victors laid the blame for the war on Germany. Even though Germany did not start it and all major countries wanted to start a war for advancement of power, during the war one point eight million German soldiers died and four point two million were wounded. The Versailles treaty outlined the reparations and postwar power.
To force Germany to accept it, the British Navy starved to death 750,000 German civilians by blockade after the war. The conditions included 13% of the total German territory in which 7,300,000 Germans lived, 132,000,000,000 Reichsmarks in payments. One mark equaled 50¢, 67% of the zinc production, 75% of the iron ore. 1,000,000 cattle, 7,500 locomotives, 200,000 freight cars, the army, the navy, the merchant ships, the colonies. Britain threatened to extend the blockade and invade if terms are not accepted.
After all that, France invaded the Ruhr region in 1923. The Ruhr produced 80% of the German coal and steel. Imagine a man who shoots you in the leg and then tells you to run a marathon and if you can't you'll get shot again. This was the relationship between the Allies and the Germans after World War I. Germany could not physically fulfill those demands.
No one in its place could because it was not about fair reparation, but slavery. Faced with two choices: accept slavery or rise to power. Germany understood that its enemy was acting in his power interest, not democracy, not human rights, not peace. Germany decided to pursue its own power interest.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
2. Weimar Germany. The height of sleaze & degeneracy that has spread through much like western nations today. 2/3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes the Weimar Republic (1918–1933) as a dark era for Germany, naming it a period defined by degeneracy, hopelessness, poverty, and death. Poverty intensified after the Versailles Treaty, with hyperinflation attributed to Jewish influences over the monetary system. It states that 4,000,000,000 marks equaled 1 US dollar and that people used money as fuel for fire, with the ink on banknotes more valuable than the money itself, leading to widespread desperation and over twenty-five thousand suicides annually.
Unemployment exceeded five million, and prostitution was rampant, with some cities reporting that one in three women resorted to it, including along with their daughters. It claims child trafficking and prostitution were common, with children on street corners holding signs listing prices for sexual acts, which could be ordered and delivered.
The transcript asserts that nationalists and communists were killing each other in the streets. It characterizes the era as marked by Jewish domination of banks, media, industries, academia, and law, claiming that Jews owned 150 private banks in Berlin despite being less than 1% of the population, and that Germans owned only 11. It further claims that most cinemas, newspapers, and publications were in Jewish hands.
It references the Frankfurt School for Critical Theory and asserts that Jews pushed a list of degeneracy onto Germany, including destruction of the family, destruction of tradition, destruction of culture, multiracialism, weakening of nation-states, political correctness and intolerance, democratization and emancipation, equality dogma, equality of sexes, homosexualization of society, ideological loss of reality, promiscuity, and destruction of environmental protection requirements. A quote attributed to a Jewish doctor allegedly summarizing these aims is provided: “Whilst large sections of the German nation were struggling for the preservation of their race, We Jews filled the streets of Germany with our vociferations. We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable. We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred.” The quote is attributed to Doctor Manfred Reifer in the German Jewish magazine Chernowitzer Allegemein Zeitung, September 1933.
The transcript concludes by stating that Adolf Hitler removed Jews from positions of influence in mass media, literature, art, music, journalism, cinema, and popular entertainment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Real Reich, Weimar Germany. The German era between 1918 and 1933 is known as the Weimar Republic, the name a result of the location where it commenced. This dark age of Germany was a low point defined by degeneracy, hopelessness, poverty, and death. In addition to the poverty brought by the Versailles Treaty, the Germans faced hyperinflation due to Jewish influences over the monetary system. Bread cost billions.
4,000,000,000 marks was equal to 1 US dollar. People would use money as fuel for fire. The ink on it was more valuable than the money. It all became worthless. Desperation caused over twenty five thousand suicides a year.
Over five million people were unemployed. Prostitution was rampant. In some cities, one in three women resorted to it. Some along with daughters. Child trafficking and prostitution were common.
Children could be seen on street corners holding signs listing the prices for all offered acts. They could be ordered and delivered for sexual services. Nationalists and communists were killing each other in the streets. This era was marked by Jewish domination of the banks, media, industries, academia, and law. Despite being less than 1% of the total population, they owned 150 private banks in Berlin, Germans only 11.
Most of the cinemas, newspapers, publications were in their hands. With the Frankfurt School for Critical Theory, Jews pushed the following degeneracy onto all Germany. Destruction of the family, destruction of tradition, destruction of culture, multiracialism, weakening of the nation states, political correctness and intolerance, democratization and emancipation, equality dogma, equality of sexes, homosexualization of society, ideological loss of reality, promiscuity, destruction of environmental protection requirements. What follows is a quote of a Jewish doctor summarizing it all: Whilst large sections of the German nation were struggling for the preservation of their race, We Jews filled the streets of Germany with our vociferations. We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable.
We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred. Doctor. Manfred Reifer, in the German Jewish magazine Chernowitzer Allegemein Zeitung September 1933, in the same month those words were written September 1933. Adolf Hitler removed Jews from positions of influence in the mass media, from the fields of literature, art, music, journalism, the cinema, and popular entertainment in general.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
3/3 Sources:@CanadaManifest1 /@GoUncensored https://t.co/JvNhkl6Ltz
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@abdirahman_____ They believe in order for their Messiah to come back to 6 mil jews have to die. So they try to trick their God.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Bobby Fischer is considered by many to be the greatest chess player of all time with an estimated IQ of approximately 180. Here he talks about the jews and the devil. https://t.co/Xlg3sR8PlT
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Dr. Ingrid Rimland on the “Nazi” German Army occupation of Ukraine in 1941: “… and it was to us as if the Lord had sent us the angels…who stopped the terror that had been upon us for 25 years. Who came and opened the churches for us… it was like heaven…“ https://t.co/QHzMNOBmEX
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Tucker Carlson destroys Mile Huckabee on Bibi’s ancestry: “He doesn’t practice judaism in a rigorous way, his ancestors didn’t live here, they didn’t speak the language, and there’s no evidence they ever lived here. So on what basis does he have a right to be here?”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Interesting clip on the Rothschild name when translated into Hebrew… https://t.co/V6PuFBjG6K
reSee.it AI Summary
I deny owning stocks in the armament sector and earning from this war, claim I repeatedly offered to the English, and after their bombs I waited three and a half months, doing nothing, hoping they would come to their senses.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“I do not possess any stocks in the armament industry… I did not earn anything from this war… I made offer upon offer to the English…When England dropped their bombs, I waited 3 1/2 months and did nothing, thinking perhaps they would come to their senses.” -Adolf Hitler For educational/historical purposes only
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“The mother of Churchill was jewish, this has been reported in the Jerusalem paper a few months ago… what is interesting is his links with the jewish community…” -David Irving,World War II Historian https://t.co/kkaOqcJZtr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses claims about Winston Churchill’s possible Jewish heritage. They say Churchill’s mother was Jewish, reported in a Jerusalem newspaper a few months prior, and that Churchill may have Jewish blood in her maternal line. The speaker notes Churchill likely was not aware of this.
They then focus on Churchill’s connections with the Jewish community, emphasizing two key periods: the “wilderness” years after he resigned from Stanley Baldwin’s cabinet, when he remained out of government from 1919 to 1939, and relied on his MP salary and modest earnings from journalism.
Despite not holding office, Churchill maintained a large country estate with extensive staff, including gardeners, nurseries, nurses, nannies, cooks, and housekeepers, sometimes 20–30 people. The speaker provides financial details: his MP salary at the time was £500 per annum (about $750, or $2,000 given the rate of $4 per pound). The question raised is how he supported this setup.
The answer offered is that from 1936 onward, Churchill was financed by a secret pressure group called the Focus. The Focus allegedly consisted of about 30–40 leading British industrialists, bankers, and former politicians who decided Churchill was worth supporting. The group is described as not exclusively Jewish; while primarily Jewish, they also included left-wing socialists and left-wing Conservative MPs who backed him.
As evidence, the speaker cites a July 1936 gift from the then-chairman of Shell Petroleum Company, who wrote a check for Churchill in the order of 40,000 (modern equivalent around $700,000) as a gift. The narrative asserts that Churchill was “bought” with this Jewish gift to support him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The mother of Churchill was Jewish, and, this had been reported in Jerusalem newspaper, I think, a few months ago. And now I'm obviously looking into that, that she had Jewish blood in her maternal line. Very interesting indeed. I don't think Churchill was cognizant of that fact. He never mentioned it.
But what is interesting is his links with the Jewish community, which I'll go into in a little bit of detail here. The two basic areas of interest to to look at in Churchill's career are the period when he was in the so called wilderness, when he resigned from Stanley Baldwin's cabinet as a minister. And for the next ten years until 09/1939, he was out of office, out of any office at all. He was just a member of parliament. So all he had was his salary as a member of parliament and his rather pitiful earnings as a journalist.
And yet somehow, managed to support an enormous country estate, which cost a very large sum of money to support with all the gardeners and the nurseries and the nurses and the nannies and the cooks and the housekeepers and all the rest of it. He had a private staff of sometimes 20 or 30 people, all supported on his salary as a member of parliament, was at that time £500 per annum, $750 a year. Or $2,000 actually because at that time, I think, it was $4 per pound. How did he do it? Well, the answer is that from 1936 onwards, he was financed by a little secret pressure group called the Focus.
You won't find much reference to the Focus in the history books, but it certainly existed and there are several files of Churchill's private papers relating to the focus. The focus was a group of perhaps 30 or 40 leading British industrialists and bankers and former politicians who decided that Churchill was worth keeping afloat, and they funded him. They weren't all Jews. They were primarily Jewish, but they're also left wing socialists and left wing conservative members of parliament who all decided to keep him afloat. In July 1936, the then chairman of the British, of the Shell Petroleum Company wrote out a check for Churchill of the order of 40,000, which in modern day money would be probably about $700,000, and gave it to him as a gift.
He was Jewish. It was a Jewish gift to Churchill, and the intention was that Churchill they they bought him.
reSee.it AI Summary
Some say they’re worth upwards of $500 trillion, half the world’s wealth. They own Reuters and the AP, control major TV networks, act as gold agent for the Bank of England, are tied to the London Bullion Market Association, and control Royal Dutch Shell. Jekyll Island and the Titanic are mentioned, and the Federal Reserve is described as an independent agency that no government can overrule.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
The Rothschilds/Federal Reserve •Some say they are worth upwards of $500 trillion, half of the world’s wealth. • They own Reuters and the Associated Press which delivers news to the entire world every day. • Controlling interest in major television networks. • Gold agent for the Bank of England • The London Bullion Market Association • Controlling interests in the world’s largest oil company Royal Dutch Shell • Jekyll Island/ • The Titanic • Federal Reserve Bank is an independent agency which means no agency or form of government can overrule actions that it takes.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a series of conspiracy claims about the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve, and Jewish influence over global finance.
- The Rothschild family is described as extraordinarily wealthy, with wealth estimates claiming “close to $500,000,000,000,000,” and as having hidden underground vaults, secret financial records never audited, and a public image that disguises a fortune that supposedly rivals a large share of global wealth. It is claimed they bought Reuters in the 1800s, which then bought the Associated Press, and that they “own controlling interest” in three major television networks, allowing them to avoid media attention. They allegedly owned and operated England’s Royal Mint and act as the gold agent for the Bank of England, directing it, with control over the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold are traded daily, generating millions weekly from transaction fees. They are said to fix the world price of gold daily, hoard trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion, and corner the world’s gold supply. They allegedly own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and run phony charities and offshore banking services to hide wealth in Vatican-linked accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. A figure named Elbelein Rothschild is described as not harmless, with ancestors alleged to have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment. The wealth is claimed to be sufficient to feed, clothe, and shelter every person on earth.
- The Rothschilds are described as the head of a “snake,” with a one-mile square area in London referred to as the city, cited as the headquarters of their banking dynasty, controlling money supplied through central banks of almost every nation.
- A Jekyll Island meeting in November 1910 is claimed to involved seven of the world’s richest Jewish men establishing a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank. Named participants include Nelson Aldrich, Frank Vanderlip, Henry Davison, Charles Norton, Benjamin Strong, Paul Warburg, and representatives of the Rothschild banking dynasty, with others like Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor purportedly opposing it. It is claimed these opposers died on the Titanic, and that opposition dissolved by April 1912. On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve Act was signed, creating a privately owned Federal Reserve System. A quoted remark attributed to Woodrow Wilson alleges, “I’m a most unhappy man. I’ve unwittingly ruined my country,” and a stereotype about government by a small number of dominant men rather than free opinion.
- It is claimed the Federal Reserve System is private, not federal, has no reserves, is not decentralized, and that the adoption of a debt-based monetary system was accomplished. It is asserted that the current banking system (fractional reserve banking) allows privately owned banks to create money “out of thin air,” with money existing as numbers in a computer system, only about 3% in physical currency, and that control of the Fed enables domination over banks, corporations, money, and politicians. It is claimed the Fed system enslaves humanity to perpetual debt and that the elite who own the Fed seek to maintain a monopoly over credit.
- A speaker questions the proper relationship between the Fed chairman and the U.S. president, noting the Federal Reserve’s independence.
- A quotation attributed to a figure named Harold Grales Rosenthal claims that Jewish power has been created through manipulating the national monetary system, that the Fed is owned by Jews while appearing as a government institution, and asserts antisemitic stereotypes about Jews as parasites and producers being exploited by Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just how rich and powerful is Lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschild's secret financial records were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled, but researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000, more than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, race horses, and exotic resorts, the Rothschilds bought Reuters in the eighteen hundreds.
Reuters then bought the Associated Press, which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world day after day. They have controlling interest in three major television networks and easily avoid media attention since they own it. Until recently, they owned and operated England's Royal Mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily. The Rothschilds earn millions weekly just on transaction fees alone.
They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs. Over the centuries, the Rothschilds have amassed trillions of worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world's largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in the Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts and holding companies. Although, Elbelein Rothschild looks like a harmless gray haired old man, make no mistake about it.
Rothschild and his ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of millions. The wealth hoarded by this family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on earth.
Speaker 1: The Rothschilds is the head of the snake. Within the city of London, there is a one mile square that is referred to as the city. This is the headquarters of the Jewish family Rothschild's banking dynasty that owns the money supplied through the central banks of almost every nation on Earth. In November 1910, seven of the world's richest Jewish men held a secret meeting on Jekyll Island just off the Coast Of Georgia to establish a central bank, which they called the Federal Reserve Bank. These men were Nelson Altrich and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller Financial Empire.
Henry Davison, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong, representing JPMorgan, and Paul Warburg, representing the Rothschild banking dynasty of Europe. There were some powerful men who made abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve System. Their total wealth today would be worth nearly $11,000,000,000. These were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Bastur. Unfortunately, all of them were on board Titanic when it sank to the depths of the sea.
All three died that night. By April 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve had been eliminated. On 12/23/1913, after many senators and congressmen had left town for Christmas, the president Wilson signed a bill, and the privately owned Federal Reserve System came into being in The United States. After Woodrow Wilson had signed the Federal Reserve Act, which gave private interest control over economic power in 1913, he said, I'm a most unhappy man. I've unwittingly ruined my country.
A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion endures of a small group of dominant men.
Jewish bankers and their rabbis actually celebrated the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. After the Federal Reserve was up and running, Charles August Lindbergh added, The financial system has been turned over the Federal Reserve Board. The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits for the use of other people's money. The Federal Reserve System was neither federal nor does it contain reserves, and nor is it part of a decentralized system. The adoption of the debt based financial system preached by Marx in the Commons Manifesto had been accomplished.
The current banking system, fractional reserve banking, enables privately owned banks to create money out of thin air. Money today is simply numbers in a computer system with only about 3% existing as physical currency. Through its control and monopoly of our money, the elite that own the Federal Reserve now have total control over other banks, corporations, money, and politicians. The Fed system is designed to enslave us to never ending debt and to fool us to believe that our money has any real value when it is in fact worthless, created out of thin air, based on debt, and backed by nothing. It must enslave humanity to protect its monopoly over credit.
Its money creating tricks enabled big brother government to borrow endless money from the Fed. The Fed were now controlled by the Jews, Rothschild, Warburg, and Schiff. Every Federal Reserve chairman since 1980 has been Jewish, Burns, Volker, Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yalen. The house of Rothschild owns 57% of the stock of the privately held Federal Reserve Bank.
Speaker 2: What is the proper relationship what should be the proper relationship between a chairman of the Fed and president of The United States?
Speaker 3: Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency and that means basically that there is no eight other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take.
Speaker 1: The Jew, Harold Grales Rosenthal, explained, our power has been created through the manipulation of the national monetary system. The Federal Reserve System fitted our plan nicely since it is owned by us, but the name implies that it's a government institution. From the very outset, our purpose was to confiscate all the gold and silver, replacing them with worthless non redeemable paper notes. We Jews had put issue upon issue to the American people. Then we promote both sides of the issue as confusion reigns.
With their eyes fixed on the issue, they fail to see who is behind every scene. We Jews, glory in the fact that the stupid goy, have never realized that we are the parasites consuming an increasing portion of production while the producers are continually receiving less and less.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
1/2 Ghislanie Maxwell Interview 2016 https://t.co/RVBHYd9eRP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The questioner asked the witness to list all the girls under 18 that the witness met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein’s house for purposes of employment. The witness responded that his job was to find adults for professional positions at Epstein’s properties (pool person, secretary, house person, chef, pilot) and objected to framing the inquiry around under-18 individuals. He stated that he did not hire people, but did interview individuals for professional jobs, and he is not aware of anyone under 18 aside from a masseuse who was 17 years old. The witness clarified that he “interviewed people for jobs that were professional people for professional things,” and emphasized that the work was for adults. He acknowledged that he did meet and hire people (or be involved in the process) but asserted that the only under-18 person he could clearly recall in connection with professional capacity for Epstein was a masseuse aged 17. When pressed further, the witness reiterated that he did not hire anyone under 18 as an adult employee, and stated that he did not recall anyone else under 18 aside from the 17-year-old masseuse. The exchange included a back-and-forth over terminology, with the witness insisting that his role was to find professional adults and that he did not encounter or interact with others under 18 beyond the single 17-year-old masseuse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you list for me all the girls that you have met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house that were under the age of 18?
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Foleyman Foundation.
Speaker 2: I could only recall my family members that were there, and I could not make a list of anyone else because that list never happened. But I can take off.
Speaker 0: I'm talking about during the time that you were working for Jeffrey Epstein. Right. Can you list all the girls that you found for Jeffrey Epstein that were under the age of 18 to come work for him in any capacity?
Speaker 1: Object to form the foundations.
Speaker 2: So I didn't find the girls. Didn't Well,
Speaker 0: not that. You choose the word.
Speaker 1: Both. No. No. You don't choose the word. If you have a question, ask it.
Speaker 0: List all of the girls that you met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's home for the purposes of employment that were under the 18.
Speaker 2: Object to form the foundation. I've already characterized what my job was, which was to find people, adults, professional people, to do the types of jobs that I listed before. Pool person, secretary, house person, chef, pilot. I'm talking about individuals 18.
Speaker 0: Not adult persons. Individuals 18.
Speaker 2: I only hire and look for people or try to find people to fill professional jobs in professional situations.
Speaker 0: 18, correct?
Speaker 2: I think we've established was 17 and Is she the
Speaker 0: only I'm sorry. Go ahead. Is she the only individual that you met for purposes of hiring someone for Jeffrey that was under the 18?
Speaker 1: Particular form and foundation mischaracterized your testimony.
Speaker 2: So I didn't hire people. Met hire us. Yes. You did. I said that.
Yes. So I interviewed people for jobs that were professional people for professional things, and I'm not aware of anyone aside from who clearly was a masseuse aged 17. But that's, you know, at least that's how far we know that I can think of that fulfilled any professional capacity for Jeffrey. List all the people under the age of 18 that you interacted with at any of Jeffrey's properties. Not aware of anybody that I interacted with other than he was 17 at this point.
I have not any idea exactly of the youngest adult employee that I hired for Jeffrey. When you
Speaker 0: say adult employee, did you ever hire someone that was under the age of 18? Never.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
2/2 Ghislaine Maxwell pacing (sped up) in her old prison cell. From @RT_com https://t.co/bMfPWdZFhI
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1920, I note the Nazi Party Program (Point 24) supported “Positive Christianity”—a nationalist, redefined Christianity stripped of Jewish influence, conflicting with both Nazism and traditional Christianity. Hitler often framed National Socialism as morally aligned with Christianity, defending Christian civilization, opposing “godless” Marxism, and naming Jews as enemies of Germany and Christianity.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“In 1920, the ‘Nazi’ (National Socialist) Party Program (Point 24) declared support for “Positive Christianity.” This wasn’t orthodox Christianity—it was a redefined, nationalist version stripped of jewish influence/fraud that conflicted with National Socialism & Christianity.” • Hitler often identified National Socialism as morally aligned with Christianity in speeches, especially early on to Germany’s largely Christian population. He talked about: • defending Christian civilization • opposing “godless” Marxism • identifying jews as enemies of both Germany and Christianity. For educational/historical purposes only
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread mixing a psychologist’s questions about an offender choosing a happy child to steal her soul, with a flood of violent, vigilante rhetoric. People advocate hunting “them,” forming militias, hanging or slow retribution, and express fury and a perceived duty to act when authorities fail. Some mention IP addresses or political identities; others condemn the situation.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Psychologist: “Why did you pick that one (young girl) and…why did you select that person?” Offender: “No I waited and I watched, I tried to find the happiest kid so that I could steal her soul…” https://t.co/ejun09r7bO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references a DOJ law enforcement map called the red dot map, where every red dot represents at least one unique IP address of individuals downloading, sharing, or distributing child abuse images involving children under 12. There are over 111,000 such IPs in the United States in the last 30 days. The problem is not limited to gangs or international networks; families are also involved, and the issue is present in the speaker’s own backyard, not just overseas.
The speaker shares alarming anecdotes to illustrate the cruelty of the abuse. One story describes a 13-year-old girl who is abused while someone reads the Bible to her, with the Bible read in rotation by different people during the abuse, in an attempt to connect the worst moment of her life with God's word. Another anecdote, cited by a psychologist friend, concerns an offender who stood at a playground watching boys and girls, selected a child, and explained that he chose that child to steal her soul—an emphasis on premeditated targeting of a child’s happiness and vulnerability.
The speaker stresses a belief that God has created some people to stand in the gap between abusers and victims, so victims would know that some people love them and that God loves them. The speaker asserts a call to rally people to form an army, possibly declare a national emergency, and leverage all resources to help victims escape this evil. The overarching message is that the issues are growing and that progress is not being made; the speaker contends that “we aren’t winning” and that “we’re losing every day until enough people stand on the line” to fight the evil, declare it, and defend the vulnerable.
The message culminates in a moral exhortation: those victims are worth fighting for, as they were worth it to King Jesus to die for, and therefore-worthy of collective action to stand against the abuse and protect children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a DOJ law enforcement map. It's called the red dot map. In every red dot on that map is at least one unique IP address of individuals downloading, sharing, distributing child abuse and images under the age of 12. And there's over a 111,000 of them just in The US of the last thirty days. You think it's so much is done by all these groups and gangs and and yes, that does take place in a lot of areas.
But man, it's overwhelming when you think how much is done by families. People will say, well, that's just over there and it's in those countries and it's all of those places and it's not. It's right here in our backyard. Some people will say, okay. Well, they're they're just downloading and sharing it and distributing it, but they're not.
A friend of ours that fights in this space was telling us a 13 year old girl that was being while someone would stand there and read the bible to her. And then they would rotate and somebody else would come in read the bible while she would be going through this horrible evil. Part of the reason that it was believed that they were doing this is so that the worst moment of her life would be associated with God's word. And that's a lot of people. One story I hate to even say it but it's by one of the top psychologists that he shared with us is one offender went to a playground and he watched all of the boys and girls.
He he picked a certain one when the psychologist he said, why why did you pick that one? And what's the reason why you did it? Why why did you why did you select that person? He said, no. I waited and I watched and I tried to find the happiest kid so that I could steal her soul.
I hate even sharing that, but that's also why I believe that God has created some of us to put us here so we could stand in the gap between them so that they would know that some people love them enough. More importantly, that heavenly father loves them enough that has already stood in the gap for them. It is our heart that we would rally an army and maybe we would even declare a national emergency to fight this evil. Our heart is to leverage anything and everything we can so that they can get out of this evil. All of these issues, it is growing.
We aren't winning. Like, we're losing every day until enough people stand on the line to say together, we're gonna fight this. We're gonna call it out. We're gonna stand on the line. They're worth it.
They were worth it to King Jesus to die for. They're worth it for us to fight for.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
From: @ShawnRyan762 👉🏼@ShawnRyanShow
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@ShawnRyan762 @ShawnRyanShow @TimTebow
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@IcanAmer_MAGA Hunting them as an idea
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@m1ndhunter_x Yes there certainly is…
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@YourSexiiMorena I don’t understand why nothing has happened to these people if they know the IP addresses
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@JGordonBramer I think militias have to be set up to hunt them
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@jjennfferr Pretty sad, huh?
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@_CassiveMock Yes. Makes me furious
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@SUMKUNT_LIKE_ME Hanging is too good for them
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@imasharm Hunt
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@SCHL0NGW1CK4769 Exacto 👌🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@USMilitia47 Slowly
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@IssacCody32356 That would make everyone on the plant very happy. If there was a vote this would be voted in. I don’t know why this is not happening to be honest.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@SassyblondeTX I think we have a duty to hunt them ourselves since nothing else is being done
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@blackpugs @pug_political Reality sadly
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@spiritualnovels 4-5. It’s insane
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a thread about adrenochrome myths, claiming wealthy elites harvest it from terrified children to extend life, with warnings for viewers. It traces claims of adrenochrome as hallucinogenic, cites Hoffer, and mentions rabbit imagery linked to Hollywood. It then recounts blood libel myths against Jews, detailing historical accusations, persecutions, and notable cases, plus a disclaimer and sources.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 1 🔹ADRENOCHROME🩸🔹 🔹ORIGINS & THEORIES🔹 “What could be more terrifying than being trafficked for sex? Being murdered in a ritual sacrifice. And even worse than that would be being murdered in a ritual sacrifice so wealthy ‘elite cabalists’ can harvest your adrenal glands to get the blood🩸compound they need to prolong their decrepit lives!” “As the conspiracy theory goes, adrenochrome is a natural compound found in the adrenal glands, that spikes at moments of fear or terror. And it provides a euphoric high so powerful that to take it even once is to become immediately addicted and unable to survive without it. And the only way to get it is to kill and devour frightened children. Post 2👇🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 2 Warning ⚠️ Not for sensitive viewers⚠️ “And who is more terrorized than a child about to be ritually killed? So the cabal (aka the deep state etc) systematically kidnaps and trafficks children first for the sexual thrills, then to murder them to harvest their adrenochrome and get high AF.” Post 3👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
Adrenochrome is described as a chemical compound produced in the human body when adrenaline oxidizes. It is claimed to cause a high related to the adrenaline flowing through the body, and a syringe is said to extract adrenochrome from the base of the neck or spinal column. A human victim purportedly produces only around 10 of adrenochrome, and after collection the drug is said to be sold on the deep black market and dark web at exorbitant prices.
Speaker 1 adds that adrenochrome is created by the pineal gland when a person is fearing for their life, and it is said to stop or slow aging; if use stops, the person allegedly rapidly ages to their expected age or worse. It is described as very popular in elite Illuminati circles, with the cabal believing children are the best source for the highest potency adrenochrome—the younger the better, since potency declines with age. It is claimed to be the most expensive drug in the world and very rare, affordable only to the richest, including celebrities and billionaires.
Speaker 0 notes that blood sacrifice has long been part of many cultures’ rituals, and that consuming fresh adrenaline-saturated blood from a terrified victim would produce a high, including increased senses, hallucinations, and euphoria, sometimes leading to supernatural attributions. The timing is said to be perfected so the victim is killed at the moment of maximum adrenaline, with knowledge passed down through secret societies and satanic cults.
Speaker 2 explains that torturing children increases endomorphins, and Satanists who drink the blood experience a chemical high from the blood of a tortured victim.
Speaker 3 states that these entities feed off human energy; during sacrifice, satanists and bloodlines drink the blood because adrenaline in the blood provides a high, and energetically, the entities feed off terror and fear.
Speaker 0 adds that many satanic sacrifices include blood and possibly body parts, with a claimed preference for children’s blood due to potency, and that some elites drink it for known rejuvenating effects.
Speaker 4 claims that drinking adrenalized children’s blood is an antiaging device, and that adrenalyzed blood from torture and killing is doubly effective; bone marrow from children is also harvested for antiaging. This is presented as a historic and ongoing practice.
Speaker 0: today, many satanic elites are addicted to drinking adrenalized blood.
Speaker 4 adds that any tortured animal at death secretes this adrenalchrome, making it a drug; users believe it confers increased power.
Speaker 5 notes survivors attest to satanic rituals involving adrenalized blood and a high from adrenaline.
Speaker 6 shifts to a broader conspiracy, alleging 26 CIA bio labs in Ukraine, with two-thirds not for dangerous pathogen work but as a hub of adrenochrome production. Ukraine is described as a major producer of adrenochrome and a large source of human trafficking. The claim extends to US-funded bio labs and the synthetic form of adrenochrome, allegedly cut with fentanyl. The speaker frames it as a cover-up involving global elites profiting trillions, linking human trafficking, torture, and adrenochrome production, tied to Ukraine’s supposed corruption and secrecy.
Overall, the transcript connects adrenochrome to elite consumption, antiaging claims, ritual sacrifice, child victims, and a conspiratorial geopolitical narrative involving Ukraine and CIA labs, with ties to trafficking, drug adulteration with fentanyl, and systemic corruption. The original form is described as originating in torture, mostly of small children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Adrenochrome, the rumored secret Illuminati drug. Technically, it's a chemical compound produced in the human body when adrenaline oxidizes. Adrenochrome is known to cause the pressure blood the amount of adrenaline that is flowing through their body. They are then killed, is and the adrenochrome is collected with a syringe from the base of the neck or spinal column. A human victim only produces around 10 of adrenochrome.
So once it's collected, the drug can be sold on the deep black market and corners of the dark web at exorbitant prices.
Speaker 1: Adrenochrome is created by the pineal gland when a human is fearing for their life. It is said to stop the aging process or slow down the aging process. Until someone stops using it, then they rapidly age to the age that they should look or worse. It's very popular in the elite Illuminati circles. The cabal learned that children were the best extraction source for the highest potency adrenochrome.
The younger, the better. As people get older, the concentration and the potency of the adrenachrome declines, and the more terrified a person was determined how potent the adrenachrome that their pineal gland created. It's probably the most expensive drug in the world and very rare because it is so very expensive. Only the richest people, celebrities, billionaires can afford it.
Speaker 0: Whether human or animal, blood sacrifice has long been part of the rituals of many cultures, and it was discovered that after consuming the fresh adrenaline saturated blood of a terrified victim, participants would experience a type of high off of the adrenaline, which could include increased senses, hallucinations, and feelings of euphoria, sometimes assigning a supernatural causality to the effects. Eventually, the precise timing was worked out so that the victim would be killed at the moment the maximum amount of adrenaline had been pumped into the body. This knowledge was passed down through secret societies, ancient mystery schools, and intergenerational satanic cults. When
Speaker 2: they torture the children, it causes a physical reaction of the endomorphins in your body to just increase because of the terror and the pain. So when the Satanists drink the blood, they actually get like a chemical, you know, a high, like a drug high from the blood of a tortured victim.
Speaker 3: These entities are feeding off human energy. And one of the things that they do is when they're sacrificing somebody, satanists and the bloodlines, they'll drink the blood because when the terror reaches a certain point in the ritual, a certain adrenaline goes in the blood, which give these people a high. I mean, sick is not the word. But on another level, an energetic level, the entities are feeding off the energy coming off of terror and fear.
Speaker 0: Most satanic sacrifices include some consumption of the blood and possibly even body parts. Even more disturbingly, some of these groups make a point of preferring the blood of children, believing it to be more potent. Another reason the elite drink children's blood is for its known rejuvenating effects. Why do you think some of these old Illuminati satanists live so long?
Speaker 4: It turns out that drinking children's blood is an antiaging device. This is just really sick and disgusting, but it's a fact. It's a chemical fact. And if you drink adrenalized children's blood, which is to say you terrorize the child, not just with sodomy, but with torture and with other satanic ritual things. If you adrenalyze the child's blood before you kill them and drink their blood, this is a doubly effective antiaging device.
You can also harvest children's bone marrow. So children are being killed for their bone marrow as an antiaging device for the elite. I don't make this stuff up. It's gone on throughout history. This is not new.
Speaker 0: Today, many of the satanic elite are addicted to drinking adrenalized blood.
Speaker 4: Any animal that is tortured at the time of its death secretes all this adrenal chrome, and that is this power. So it's a drug. It is a drug, and these people are addicted to it. And they also believe, anyway, that they have increased power, and and perhaps they do.
Speaker 0: Numerous survivors have attested to satanic sex engaging in ritualistic consumption of adrenalized blood, experiencing a high from the adrenaline.
Speaker 5: When they go to murder a child, they make sure the child is terrified, so they pump the adrenaline through the blood. And they then they like to drink that blood, and they're addicted to adrenaline, a lot of them. So there's actually a science when you analyze it. There's a science behind their madness.
Speaker 6: There were 26 bio labs set up by the CIA in Ukraine. We're two thirds of the 26. We're not set up for making dangerous gain of research pathogens, but was the hub of, you guessed it, adrenochrome production. Ukraine was the hub of one of the most abundant human trafficking spots on the planet. That should shock the world.
It's one of the most corrupt countries on the planet. The brutal truth is that Ukraine was the biggest producer of adrenochrome in the world. This will explain why all the secrecy and why 90% of all the paid mercenaries have walked off their jobs recently, and some have even shifted size to help the alliance of nations. And Ukraine is defeated. So this is a big part of the puzzle that is being revealed to the world.
You're gonna hear about it from others. I wonder how many of The US funded bio labs was actually making this adrenochrome product. This was for the most expensive drug on the planet, and they also got a way to make its generic form a synthetic adrenochrome. And I want you to guess what is the most popular used drug to cut this synthetic adrenochrome with. You guessed it.
Fentanyl. So it all ties together. It's the biggest cover up about Ukraine, guys. And what makes it so terrible is that these criminals, these demons were actually funding all of this with your money. You know, I'm not just talking about American money, money from all over the world.
All these countries that the intelligence agencies are in and the cabal is in have been using your money to do their dirt and make more money. They steal your money to put it into opportunities, should I say, to create an industry that makes them trillions of dollars each year. And I'm not gonna get into this pain and suffering of all the human trafficking. When Americans find this out, they're gonna be pretty pissed off also. So prepare yourself, guys.
It's a sad day for this world that we allow these few, just a small group of idiots, criminals to conduct human trafficking, torture, and the production of a drug. All I know is that in its original form, it comes from torture and mostly of small children.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵 Post 3 “We suspected it might be an hallucinogen because pink or deteriorated adrenaline was, and it resembled the few known hallucinogens like d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)” wrote Abram Hoffer, one of the original adrenochrome researchers in a 1990 article called “The Adrenochrome Hypothesis and Psychiatry,” adding that “schizophrenia arose in an individual when too much adrenochrome was formed, [therefore] adrenochrome then interfered with brain function as would LSD, and that created the essential stage for the formation of schizophrenia.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a dark matter still in the world today: human ritual sacrifice, an ancient practice, and it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused throughout time. Understandably, many people are skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years. After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be pure anti-Jewish propaganda. Likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti-Jewish propaganda, but a fact that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti-Semite. A term used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them. Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti-Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so-called anti-Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti-Semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti-Semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti-Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder. Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs’ blood-stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live. In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you’ll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past? And could there be some proven sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they’re probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains. What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child’s blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights. Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there’s one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes. While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel. This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a dark matter still in the world today. It is something that is perhaps older than written language itself. Human ritual sacrifice. And it has been something for which Jewish extremists have often been accused of throughout time. Understandably, since it's not an everyday topic, many people are highly skeptical of this bizarre accusation that has the Jewish people for at least two thousand years.
After all, why would fanatical Jews in the past and perhaps even to this very day commit human sacrifice? Many people do not like to even think about the topic, believing it to be just pure unadulterated anti Jewish propaganda. And likewise, the Jews themselves are quick to say that such claims are lies, which have been handed down through the centuries. However, there are two sides to this issue. One side believes Jewish ritual murder is not merely anti Jewish propaganda, but a fact.
One that has had a terrible impact on society since it began. Perhaps some viewers may doubt what is uncovered in this video, but an honest glimpse into this matter may make you think. Likewise, an in-depth and fair examination will make most skeptics into true believers. It is true that many of the people who conducted research into these matters were branded by Jews with the epithet of anti Semite. A term that it seems is used by Jews to stifle discussion on any topic that criticizes them.
Certainly, however, if someone who is branded an anti Semite by Jews says the sky appears blue on a sunny day, is it any less blue just because the so called anti Semite said it was? This is usually the case with respect to these matters. While some people who investigated these matters were really anti semites, it was the fact that human sacrifice was practiced by Jews that caused many of these people to become anti semites. After uncovering the secret among the Jewish cult in times past, how could a Gentile feel otherwise? After all it is not the anti Semite who commits the foul act of human sacrifice, now commonly referred to as Jewish ritual murder.
Yet Jews sought to make the Gentiles who reported these crimes appear worse than the Jews who committed them. Most historians know and admit that human sacrifice has occurred in the past amongst various sects. The Aztecs blood stained temples attest to this. Many innocents met their fate that way with their hearts plucked from their bodies. The practice called in India where women would sacrifice themselves in flames is still practiced today in obscure parts where some of India's 1,000,000,000 mostly Hindus live.
In Mexico, even just a few years ago, a strange cult was uncovered that had sacrificed many people, including American college student, Mark Kilroy. The same is true of Africa and various parts of South America today. If you merely comb the Internet, you'll realize that, yes, there are some groups who still engage in barbaric practices such as human sacrifice. So what are the facts about the Jews? Have they also engaged in such terrible acts in the past?
And could there be some proven of sect amongst Jews, extremists no doubt, who to this very day still commit the wicked crime of ritual murder. Most Jews have asked about ritual murder will vehemently deny any knowledge of it, of course. And they're probably telling you the truth. If there are Jewish hate mongers who engage in these acts and there is strong evidence to indicate such, it is probably only a small number of them. So if this is indeed the case, one question still remains.
What makes these crimes stand apart from other cruel acts committed by man against man in the past? The answer to this question is not a pretty one. Based on numerous reports from the past to modern times, the main difference is the degree of cruelty. Reports say children sacrificed in Jewish occult rights were tortured to death in the most cruel and heartless ways imaginable. After the ceremony, Jews reportedly dried the child's blood, often absorbing it into paper, for their various occult rights.
Aside from claims of Jewish ritual murder being carried out in an extremely vicious manner, there's one other difference that sets this crime apart from others. When such crimes are uncovered, not only the local Jewish groups, but Jews from all over the entire world seek to conceal it. In the past, Jews have even set aside a special fund to cover up such acts. However, by doing this they become as a police might say, an accessory after the fact. From time to time, there have been brave and honest Jews who would deviate from their kinsfolk and admit to the truth of these crimes.
While such honesty was not common amongst Jews, it still occurred on occasions. For this reason alone, indictment against all Jews cannot be made. Indeed, some Jews, young and old, have admitted these crimes in front of court, written about them in books, discussed them in debates, and so forth. For the most part, however, Jews typically deny such accusations. They have even developed a phrase for this type of accusation, blood libel.
This term is often used as a rallying cry amongst Jewish groups.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 4 As we all know who owns/manages most of Hollywood and the music industry….. The chemical compound for Adrenochrome looks like a rabbit when turned upright. Why else place rabbits and not other animals in strategic locations in video and pictures….? The artists may just be doing as they are told…..not knowing the possible hidden meaning behind the rabbit…?
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 5 Warning ⚠️ Not for sensitive viewers⚠️ Blood🩸libel or ritual murder libel (also blood accusation) is a theory which accuses Jews 🔯of murdering Christians ✝️in order to use their blood in the performance of religious rituals. Echoing very old myths of secret cultic practices in many prehistoric societies. According to Tertullian, (a prolific early Christian author from Carthage in the Roman province of Africa) it originally emerged in late antiquity as an accusation made against members of the early Christian community of the Roman Empire.The first examples of medieval blood libel emerged in England in the mid 1100s before spreading into other parts of Europe, especially France and Germany. This libel, alongside those of well poisoning and host desecration, became a major theme of the persecution of Jews in Europe from that period down to modern times. Post 6👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker revisits the notion of Jewish involvement in human sacrifice, challenging the common assumption that the Abraham-and-Isaac episode ended all such practices for Jews. The argument presented is that evidence suggests human sacrifice was sometimes practiced by Jews in ancient and medieval times, including children burned in pits called toffet, with drums used to muffle cries, particularly among Jews in Carthage around three hundred years before Christ who worshipped Baal. The speaker notes that similar reports persist in various periods and places, including assertions that during a battle in Syracuse nearly five hundred children were thrown into a burning toffet as an offering to Baal, and that children were placed in the arms of a bronze bull with a furnace below and then burned.
The term holocaust is invoked as describing the act, with the speaker claiming that, in older dictionaries, holocaust referred to the burning of children as sacrifice to deities, though modern usage has shifted. Ancient historians such as Apion, Democritus, and Poseidonius are cited as describing Jewish ritual murder. Appian allegedly reported in 168 BCE that an intended victim, an adult, was found at a Jewish temple and that a ritual was enacted annually involving kidnapping a Greek foreigner, slaying him, consuming his flesh, and swearing hostility against the Greeks, with remains cast into a pit. Flavius Josephus is contrasted with Appian; Thackeray’s translation of Josephus recounts a Greek man abducted and brought to the temple, who explains a “one unutterable law of the Jews” involving kidnapping, ritual slaughter, and blood use.
The account claims numerous later authorities described ritual murder of Christians during Purim, including Socrates Scholasticus and Baronius. It mentions a Gentile child crucified or slain by Jews in various chronicles (Imistar, Kiev, Treviso, Magdeburg, and England), with specific cases: a boy named William in England (documented by Thomas of Monmouth), whose blood supposedly produced miraculous effects; the boy’s murder was cited as a crusading cause against Jewish communities, culminating in William’s canonization as a saint. The speaker cites Thomas’s Latin account, later translated, of abduction, torture, and the bribes given to sheriffs, and claims William’s case helped alert English parents.
The narrative continues with the notion that a converted Jew, Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that Jews took blood annually from Christians to obtain freedom and return to Palestine, with lots drawn to determine the blood source. Other cases cited include a December incident in Kissingen, Bavaria; Hugh in London; Isaac de Pouley in Oxford; Trent in 1475 (Simon), where children were punctured with marks, circumcision mentioned, and a saintly martyrdom recorded by Beatus Andreas. Luther’s remarks on “the Jews and their lies” are cited, noting accusations of poisoning wells and mutilation.
Additional episodes include Christopher in 1492 Spain and Isabella I’s edict expelling Jews (with later reconsideration in 1967), Prague in 1502, Pona in Lithuania 1574, Lublin and Kutnia in 1598, and broader counts by Montague Summers and others of hundreds of alleged historic ritual murders and the use of blood for magical purposes. The speaker ties these anecdotes to a pattern of medieval and early modern allegations of ritual murder against Jews, asserted across multiple cities and centuries.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But let's go to the crux of the matter. When did it begin? And is there evidence to show that this has been a regular occurrence? Usually, when you think of Jews and human sacrifice, you will probably think of the incident between Abraham and Isaac in the Old Testament where Abraham believed his God wanted him to sacrifice his son until an angel supposedly appeared and told him otherwise. Many people erroneously believe that human sacrifice amongst Jews ended right then and there for all Jews.
But just think about that for a second. Now Abraham, here he is getting ready to sacrifice his very own son. Abraham reportedly stopped. But what about all the other Jews? Did they too?
There is strong evidence to suggest otherwise. Children who were sacrificed were often burnt in a pit called a Toffet. Drums were beaten in an attempt to conceal the child's cries. This practice was quite prevalent amongst Jews who lived in Carthage around three hundred years before Christ and who worshipped Baal, another name for lord. Even today, you'll hear of a rabbi Baal.
Just do a search on the Internet. When losing a battle in Syracuse, nearly five hundred children were tossed into a burning toffet as a sacrifice to Baal. Sometimes, children were put in the arms of a bronze bull, which had a furnace below it, and those committing this vicious act then allowed the flames to consume the child. The level of cruelty in these cases knew no bounds. One thing that some may find act of human sacrifice.
They call it holocaust. As surprising as this may seem to some, the word holocaust is a Jewish word that was used to describe the act of putting a child into the flames as a sacrifice to their deity. Of course, Jews have assigned a completely different meaning to the term nowadays. But if you take a look at an older dictionary, you will see that we're right about this. Ancient historians such as Apion, Democritus, and Poseidonius described instances of Jewish ritual murder.
In one sixty eight before Christ, Appian reported an intended victim, an adult, not a child, was found at the Jewish temple. Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus, disagreed with Appian's findings, which were translated and published by Thackeray in his book Josephus. Thackeray reported, Antiochus found in the temple a couch on which a man was reclining. The king's entry was instantly hailed by this man with adoration. Falling to his knees, he stretched out his right hand and implored the king to set him free.
Thereupon, the king reassured him and bade him tell him who he was, why he was living there, and what was the meaning of this abundant fare. In a pitiful tone and full of sighs and tears, the man told this tale of his distress. He said was a Greek, and that while traveling about his province for his livelihood, he was suddenly kidnapped by men of a foreign race and conveyed to the temple where he was locked up. Finally, the attendants who were waiting upon him told him of the one unutterable law of the Jews. A ritual which was repeated annually at a fixed time.
They would kidnap a Greek foreigner and then convey him to the forest where they would slay him, sacrificing his body with their customary ritual, eat of his flesh, while immolating the Greek, swear an oath of hostility against the Greeks. The remains of their victims were thrown into a pit. In the first millennium of the current era, in the year March, Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea said that Jews in all communities ritually murdered Christians during their Purim festivals. In the year 04/15, Socrates, Scholasticus reported that Jews of Imistar bound a Gentile child on a cross and poked him till he died. In 04/25, Baronius reported Jews had crucified a child.
In 06/14, the monk Antiochus Stratagos reports that when Jerusalem fell to the Persians, Jews purchased one of the Gentiles who had been captured by the Persians and slew him like a sheep. In October Prague, six Jews reportedly drained blood from a three year old child. It was also discovered that these Jews had dispersed the child's blood giving it to other Jews in Treviso. In October, a child by the name of Estrati was reportedly discovered having been ritually murdered in what is now known as the city of Kiev. He was later made a saint.
In the year 11/15 near the city of Magdeburg, Germany, on the day prior to Passover, ascetic Jews tortured five children and used their blood in occult rites. The incident was investigated and the Jews were found guilty and punished accordingly. Up until that time, many of the previous incidents had probably been forgotten. It seems likely that most historical records regarding these incidents were lost over time. In the year November, incident occurred to a child in England that would make history and the Jews not easily forgotten.
It had been just a little over fifty years since Jews were first permitted to enter England in October. A small number of them had just been brought to England in an effort to assist the king with collecting his taxes. Consequently, as the town discovered to their dismay, a child by the name of William was ritually murdered. But what made this event different different was that this child was related to an educated monk, Thomas of Monmouth. This event that occurred to William, like so many before it, could eventually sunk into obscurity.
But Thomas wanted to let the whole world know about this cruel and vicious nature of these wicked acts once and for all, probably with the hope of putting a stop to them. His book was written in Latin and was later translated into in the nineteenth century by doctor a Jessop. Thomas of Munmouth described how Jews abducted the child. Afterwards, according to Thomas, this occurred. Having shaved William's head, he wrote, they stabbed it with countless thorn points and made the blood come horribly from the wounds they made.
And cruel were they, and so eager to inflict pain, it was difficult to say whether they were crueler or more ingenious in their tortures. Thomas and Monmouth describe the whole sordid event in detail, the abduction, the torture suffered by the child, and the bribes Jews gave to the sheriff and more. Thomas' efforts to document this Jewish occult right of an innocent child eventually resulted in the child becoming a saint. And he was remembered until modern times, until the church no longer permitted such politically incorrect facts to be known. Thomas did a great service to the world in his efforts to eradicate child sacrifices by making known what it occurred on that dark grizzly day back in November.
It put parents in England on alert so they would know to take precautions to keep their children safe. Unfortunately, that was not the last such reported incident of Jewish ritual murder. Why would Jews continue to engage in such wicked crimes? Doctor Arnold Lees, who wrote a book about Jewish ritual murder in the early part of the twentieth century in England, noted some interesting facts surrounding the ritual murders. A converted Jew called Theobald of Cambridge confessed that the Jews took blood once a year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine.
And it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied. The tragic murder that occurred to William set a precedent. Because of Thomas of Monmouth's books that he wrote about the good child, others began to record these wicked deeds perpetrated by fanatical Jews. Some more of these reported victims follow. In December in Kissingen, Bavaria, Jews were convicted by a court of law after having confessed to having used the blood of Gentiles for occult rights in their Jewish holiday of Passover.
In the year December in London, England, a young innocent Gentile by the name of Hugh was discovered to have been ritually murdered. His punctured body was found hidden on a Jew's property. After having reviewed the evidence, a court tried and convicted 18 prominent Jews of having committed the deed. The child was later canonized and became a saint. Altogether, before the Catholic church became a for political correctness, there were over 20 children who had been ritually murdered by Jews and made into saints.
In December in Oxford England, a Jew by the name of Isaac de Pouley was arrested for the ritual murder of a Gentile child. Perhaps this was the defining moment as Jews were permanently banished from England a month later. Many of these Jews fled to Germany or other European cities. It was only after the king of England himself was murdered four centuries later by Lord Cromwell that Jews were allowed back there. Although the edict officially remains in effect.
In 1331 in Gubelin, Germany, it was said the Jews had murdered a Gentile child for occult rights. The Jews were found guilty and were punished harshly for this deed. They were burnt alive. In the year 1345 in Munich, Germany, Jews reportedly punctured a gentile child by the name of Henry in more than 60 places, causing the innocent child to be bled dry. In Venice, Italy in the year 1420, according to local records, Jews ritually murdered a child in a cruel fashion, and they were executed for this inhumane crime.
In the year 1462 in the village of Rin, Innsbruck in Austria, Jews reportedly ritually murdered a child by the name of Andela on a large stone. The child became a celebrated saint. A church was built around the stone. The city even became known as Judenstein or the Jew Stone. More recently in 1997, professor Robert Brandner of a theological college in Austria said this about ritual murders.
He said, Jews should apologize for their deplorable crimes against Catholic children like the holy martyr child under the and against adults in the days before Easter. And for the blood of murdered Christians spilt by Jewish hands, which cries to heaven too. Jews became a little perturbed when the pope met with professor Puntner. In the year 1475 in Trent, Italy, Jews reportedly ritually murdered a child by the name of Simon. During the process, they also circumcised the child.
This has also been the reported case in many other such incidents, although we don't believe it's necessarily a requirement during the bloodletting process. This child too had puncture marks over his entire body. The child was later made a saint. In the book, lives of the saints, father Alban Butler described the child as an infant martyr and describes the event surrounding his murder thus. The Jews in the city of Trent decided to vent their hate by slaying a Christian child for the coming Passover.
And Tobias, one of their number, was deputed to entrap found a bright smiling boy named Simon playing outside his home with no one guarding him. Tobias patted the little fellow's cheek and coaxed him to take his hand. The boy who was not two years old did so, but he began to call and cry for his mother when he found himself being led from his home. Then Tobias silenced his grief and conducted him securely to his house. At midnight on holy Thursday, the work of butchery began.
They gagged his mouth. They held his arms in the form of a cross while they pierced his tiny body with oils and bodkins in blasphemous mockery. After an hour's torture, the little martyr lifted his eyes to heaven and gave up his innocent soul. The Jews cast his body into the river, but their crime was discovered and punished while the holy relics were enshrined in Saint Peter's Church in 1485, another Gentile child reportedly suffered a similar fate at Morustica. Pope Benedict the fourteenth canonized the child who became known as Saint Laurentino and mentioned the child as a martyr in his bull, Beatus Andreas.
The Episcopal Court of Padua, Italy attested to the authenticity of this incident. Despite small differences, it is interesting to that many other religious leaders have acknowledged these facts with respect to Jewish child murders. Cardinal Ganganelli, who later became a pope, once wrote, I admit as true the fact of the blessed Simon, a boy three years old killed by the Jews of Trent. I also admit as a truth another fact which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rin. In the person of the blessed Andela, a boy barbarously murdered by Jews.
The Reverend Doctor. Martin Luther, founder of the Lutheran Church briefly described his thoughts on this matter and his thesis, the Jews and their lies. In history, he says therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children, and mutilating them as in Trent, Vicency, etcetera. Of course, they deny this, be it so or not. However, I know completely well the full ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transform it into deeds in secret or openly.
Know this for a certainty and act accordingly. In 1492, LaGuardia, Spain, a child by the name of Christopher was said to have been ritually murdered by Jews. Shortly Shortly thereafter, queen Isabella of Spain issued an edict that banished Jews from Spain forever. And it was not until approximately 1967, the Jews were officially allowed back. There were many reasons cited for banishment such as overall wickedness.
The one reason was particularly interesting. It was called a serious and detestable crime. Well respected historian William Walsh argues in his book Isabella of Spain that this crime was that of the ritual murder of Christopher who later was made a saint. In 1502 in Prague, a Jew was found guilty of having murdered a gentile child in an effort to extract the child's blood. In 1574, Lithuania in the village of Pona, the Jews reportedly tortured and then murdered a baby for occult rights.
In 1598 in Lublin, in Kol, and Kutnia, Poland, it was reported that Jews tortured three babies in those three cities. When the incident came to court, all Jews who were involved in the matter were discovered guilty. According to the book by the Russian writer, doctor Vladimir Dahl, notes about the ritual murders, he says, it is difficult to determine how many Jewish occult murders reportedly occurred in history. Montague Summers, a well respected historian, described some of his findings in his book, The History of Witchcraft and Demonology. Closely connected with these ancient sorceries are those ritual murders of which learned at pre monstratansian canon of Wilson, Adrian Kempera, writing in 1745 was able to enumerate no less than 250.
The latest of these having taking place in 1650 when at Qaddan in Bohemia, Matthias, a lad of four years old, was killed by certain rabbis with several wounds. In many cases, the evidence is quite conclusive that the body, and especially the blood of the victim, was used for magical purposes.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 6 Warning ⚠️ Not for sensitive viewers⚠️ The accusations often assert that the blood of Christian children is especially coveted, and historically, blood libel claims have been made in order to account for the otherwise unexplained deaths of children. In some cases, the alleged victims of human sacrifice have become venerated as Christian ✝️ martyrs. Many of these – most prominently William of Norwich(1144), Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln (1255), and Simon of Trent (1475) – became objects of local cults and veneration; the cult of Hugh of Lincoln gained the support of Henry III and his son Edward I, giving it official credibility and helping it to be particularly well remembered. Although he was never canonized, the veneration of Simon was added to the General Roman Calendar. One child who was allegedly murdered by Jews, 🔯Gabriel of Białystok, was canonized by the Russian 🇷🇺Orthodox Church.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript compiles a series of alleged ritual murder cases and accompanying commentary stretching from the 17th to the early 20th centuries, presenting a continuous thread of accusations against Jews in various European locales and times.
- 1663, Kakao, Poland: Rabbi Matatia Kallahora was believed to have murdered a gentile child for his Jewish occult rights; he was tried, convicted, and executed.
- 1669, near Metz, France: writes doctor Dahl, the Jew Levi kidnapped a baby, later found dead in the forest; the guilty man was put to death. The case details are described in a small French book, A Summary of the Trial Against the Jews in Metz in 1670.
- 1619, Belarus: Jews reportedly murdered a young child named Gavril in a ritualistic fashion; in 1997, Belarusian television produced a documentary about the murder.
- 1753, Markova, Vonitsa (in the area of present-day Greece/Ukraine borderlands): Gittomura promulgated on Friday, April 20, 1753; in the village of Markova, Vonitsa, Jews allegedly called three-year-old Stefan Struditsky and carried him away.
- On Sunday, the Jews gathered in a house, blindfolded the child, closed his mouth with pincers, and then, while holding the child in a tub, pricked him from all sides with sharp nails, moving him to extract as much blood as possible. After the child’s death, the corpse was carried to a forest and found the next day. By obvious evidence, the Jewesses Brine and Frutza, without torment, confessed to involvement; their husbands were exposed by them. Other men were implicated and subjected to torture; these others confessed and detailed the crime, and the Jews involved were executed. A picture of the corpse was drawn, showing the pricked body, kept safe with the archbishop of Lvov.
- 1791, Tasnad, Hungary: Jews were accused of ritually murdering a gentile boy; one of the Jews’ children admitted having seen the event.
- 1797, Gelats, Romania: a child was allegedly ritually murdered by Jews.
- 19th century: explorer and linguist Sir Richard Francis Burton wrote a manuscript called Human Sacrifice Amongst the Sephardim or Eastern Jews. Some of his manuscript was obtained by Jews and published as The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam. In this book, Burton notes that in 1825, the Jews of Beirut made a way with Fatala Sayyid, an Alpine Mohammedan.
- 1829, Hama: the Jews of Hama murdered a Mohammedan girl and were expelled from the city.
- 1839, Beirut: a Jewish-owned flask of blood passed through the customs house of Beirut.
- 1840, Damascus: one of the most notorious modern ritual murders occurred when a Catholic priest named Father Thomas was ritually murdered. Burton’s original manuscript described the investigation; notes used in The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam did not include full details.
- The New York Herald (04/06/1850) reported the case under the title Mysteries of the Talmud, Terrible Murder in the East, describing the murder of Father Thomas and the trial of those involved, including claims that blood was used to moisten holy unleavened bread. Manuscripts of the original trial are said to be sealed by French and Austrian councils; Mustafa Talas, with a doctorate in history, translated transcripts from France into English in a book called Mazo of Sion, which is being made into a movie. Talas describes the investigation, including confrontations about blood and the Talmud.
- Jonathan Frankel wrote The Damascus Affair to counter Talas’s book; Frankel’s work is suggested to reveal less than Talas’s, potentially to conceal the truth of the event.
- Early 20th century aftermath: two people independently guided investigators to the remains of Father Thomas discovered in a sewer behind a rabbi’s home.
- 1850s–1900s: references to subsequent stories of Jewish ritual murder in various contexts continue, including the implication of a universal sensationalism and the alleged practice used to undermine Christianity or to achieve occult aims.
- 1911, Kiev, Russia: a highly publicized case of Andrej Yushinsky, an innocent young child killed for occult rights; Menachem Mendel Baylis was accused; extensive international involvement and allegations of jury manipulation, witnesses killed, and evidence destroyed; Baylis was freed by a simple majority verdict (six of twelve jurors), with later claims of corruption and a “kangaroo court” linked to the Bolshevik era.
- John Grant, US consul in Odessa, reported the jury verdict; Baylis allegedly killed by fanatical Jews; evidence pointed to the crime occurring inside a synagogue at the Jewish-owned Seitzew factory. A 13-wound pattern on the head was cited as symbolic of ritual acts, with a referenced line of analysis connecting Sephirothic symbolism to the wounds.
- Vasily Rosenov (Rosanoff) and others connected to Kabbalistic interpretation, including the concept of Echad, and the Shin letter as a symbol within the wounds, was discussed in supporting material.
- Postscript: Zamoslovsky, the prosecuting attorney, wrote The Murder of Andrei Yushinsky; the Bolshevik revolution followed; Zamoslavsky was murdered for exposing the facts, and his book was classified until 1997 to suppress the truth of the matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1663, Kakao in Poland, Rabbi Matatia Kallahora was believed to have murdered a gentile child for his Jewish occult rights. He was tried, convicted, and executed for the crime. In 1669, near Metz in France, writes doctor Dahl, the Jew Levi kidnapped a baby, which was later found dead in the forest. The guilty man was put to death. The details of this case were described in a small French book, a a summary of the trial against the Jews in Metz in 1670.
In 1619, Belarus, Jews reportedly murdered a young child by the name of Gavril in a ritualistic fashion. In 1997, Belarusian television made a documentary about this child's murder. Only twenty three years prior to America declaring its independence from England, doctor Dahl describes an incident in 1753, Gittomura. He promulgated on Friday the April twentieth seventeen fifty three in the village of Markova, Vonitsa. Jews called three year old Stefan Struditsky and carried him away.
On Sunday, the Jews gathered in a house, blindfolded the child, closed his mouth with pincers, and then, while holding the child in a tub, pricked him from all sides with sharp nails, moving him around in an effort to extract as much blood as possible. After the child had died, the corpse was carried to a forest where the dead child was found the next day. By obvious evidence, the Jewesses Brine and Frutza, without torment, confessed to having been involved in this killing, and their husbands were exposed by them. And also, without a torment, confessed. Then other men were implicated and forced to undergo torture.
These others confessed and made such a detailed description of this crime that no doubt could remain as to their guilt. The Jews who were involved were then executed. A picture of the child's corpse was drawn, which showed how it was found pricked over the entire body. This picture was kept safe with the archbishop of Lvov. In 1791 in Tasnad, Hungary, Jews were again accused of ritually murdering a gentile boy.
In this particular case, one of the Jews children admitted to having seen the entire sordid event. In 1797 in Gelats, Romania, a child was alleged ly ritually murdered by Jews. In the nineteenth century, explorer and linguist, Sir Richard Francis Burton, wrote a manuscript called human sacrifice amongst the Sephardim or Eastern Jews. Some Jews were somehow able to obtain his manuscript which is held by the Jewish Board of Deputies in England, but not before part of this manuscript was published as the book, The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam. In this book, Burton noted 1825, the Jews of Beirut made a way with Fatala Sayyid, an alpine Mohammedan.
1829, the Jews of Hama murdered a Mohammed girl and were expelled from the city. 1839, a Jewish owned flask of blood passed through the customs house of Beirut. In 1840, one of the most notorious ritual murders in modern times occurred. When a Catholic priest by the name of father Thomas was ritually murdered. This was described in-depth in sir Richard Francis Burton's original manuscript, but not in the notes that we use for the book, The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam.
Fortunately, newspaper clippings and other books now tell this grisly tale in full. The New York Herald of 04/06/1850 reported the case under the title, mysteries of the Talmud, terrible murder in the East. The article which is relatively long describes the vicious murder of father Thomas. Who would have dreamt beholding the bloody mysteries of the Talmud exposed in their turn and of having the trial of one of the most savage and ferocious murders ever yet recorded in the annals of criminality once more bought before the public? Who would have imagined that certain fanatics use human blood to moisten their holy unleavened bread?
Our readers will undoubtedly recollect the universal sensation created throughout the world by the discovery of father Tomasul, a Christian missionary from Sardinia, and his servant Ebrahim Amara. They had both been bled to death, their limbs chopped off joint by joint, their bones pounded in the mortar, and their mutilated remains thrown into a drain in the city of Damascus. Manuscripts of the original trial are sealed by the French and Austrian councils of that city are now in the city. We can therefore defy the great nation to contradict the truth of our statements. Mustafa Talas, who has a doctorate in history and is an attorney went to the difficult task of obtaining the original transcripts of the investigation and records from France where father Thomas was a citizen and translating all these into English.
He should be commended on his investigative work. He published all this in a book called Mazo of Sion, which is now being made into a movie and may have Omar Sharif, who played the lead role in the movie doctor Chivago play the part of father Thomas. Doctor Talas describes the investigation. The investigator said, you have mentioned in your that the Jews extracted the blood of Christians and used it to make bread. It is known by your belief that blood is not clean and is forbidden by your religion even when taken from lawfully slain animals.
It is not lawful to use blood. There exists a contradiction between blood being impure and forbidden, and that of its being lawful if taken from a Christian human being, especially to make bread for the holy day. Is there any logical convincing proof that will explain this contradiction? Ayom was Lemani, who was a Jewish convert to Islam answered, the Talmud says that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to God. The blood of Passover and the blood of circumcision.
Rabbi Jacob, the head rabbi of Syria added, God loves two kinds of blood, the Passover sacrificial blood and the blood of circumcision. Investigator responded. We do not understand very well how it is permissible to use human blood. I'm Muslim Mali answered, the chief rabbis know by the codes given to them how and when it is permissible to use this blood. The Jewish writer Jonathan Frankel wrote the book, The Damascus Affair that was supposed to counter doctor Talas' book.
Of course, it appears that Frankel's book doesn't reveal nearly as much about the incident as doctor Talas' book. Probably because Frankl might want to keep the truth of the event concealed. It is interesting to point out that two people independently of each other took investigators to the same place where the remains of father Thomas were discovered. In the sewer behind a rabbi's home where hate mongering Jews had reportedly put the priest's chopped up remains. Just a decade after the Damascus incident in 1850 in New York City, reports were made of murdering children.
Approximately 100 irate Irishman accompanied by the local police broke into a synagogue to save the victim. It's unclear whether they were able to save a child. In 1899, Jews allegedly ritually murdered Agnes of Polna. One of the culprits who purportedly murdered her was initially sentenced to death. A year later in 1900, some fanatical Jews were said to have ritually murdered Ernst Winter.
In 1911, Kiev Russia, one of the most notorious Jewish ritual murders occurred. An innocent young child by the name of Andrej Yushinsky was discovered to have been killed for occult rights. Menachem Mendel Baylis was accused of being the perpetrator of the crime. Jews from around the world sought to conceal the true nature of the crime and they spent over the equivalent of at least 115,000,000 in today's money so that the Bayley's team of lawyers would win the case. Several witnesses died under mysterious conditions prior to trial.
Michoac, a high ranking police investigator, was proven to have planted false evidence to benefit Balise. Three innocent children who had been with Andre and witnesses of abduction by Balise were given pieces of cake by a scurrilous investigator named Krasovsky. And the next day, all three became ill. Two died as a result, and the third was sick for months. The one who survived, Lord Miller Chiberiak said, we started to ride the clay mixer.
Suddenly, Balis and two other Jews ran towards us. We jumped off the clay mixer and tried to run away. Andre and my brother, Zhenya, were caught by Balis and the other Jews, but my brother freed himself. The Jews then dragged Andre away. My younger sister, Valentino, also saw this.
John Grant, who was the American consulate stationed in Odessa, Russia at the time, reported the jury's final verdict. Grant noted that it was determined by a jury that a certain boy found cruelly murdered in Kiev had been killed by fanatical Jews, and that Jews for occult purposes had carefully drawn all blood from the dying child. That it was an instance of Jewish ritualistic murder that Baylis was innocent. While it was proven to have taken place inside the synagogue at the Jewish owned Seitzew factory, the jury could not determine for certain that Baylis was the one who wielded the awl causing Andre to be punctured over forty five times around his body in an effort to procure as much blood as possible. If you look closely, and I realize it might be difficult, but if you look closely, you can see thirteen puncture marks to the side of the child's cranium, which Jews reportedly did as part of some sort of ritual as a sacrifice so they could overthrow the czar.
Vivi Rosenov, a popular Russian poet and writer at the time of the Byelis trial, wrote a book about the incident too. His book is called The Relation of Jews to Blood, and it tells how Hasidic Jews use blood in occult rites. Rosenov's book also describes the Kabbalistic mythology used in Yuschinski's murder by the Hasidic cult. In essence, the stab wounds were reportedly made in a ritualistic manner. A summation of Roosevelt's findings shall follow.
In the Kabbalah, there is a sephirothic tree that is made up of four worlds. Pictured new world. The The The The is is world. New channel 21, which corresponds to the Hebrew letter Shin to arrive at Sefirot 10, the kingdom. The letter Shin then implies that for Jews to use such symbology in the placement of stab wounds during their ritual murder, it is thus done to honor the Jewish deity and to attain the Jewish kingdom over the world.
In Rosenov's book, he shows the Hebrew letters associated with the lower triangle of Sephiroths. Some of these other Sephiroths in the lower triangle are Sephiroth seven, victory, and Sephiroth nine, the world of elements. On page 225 of his book, Rosen writes that the placement of the wounds on Ushinsky's head were actually a partial representation of the Sephirothic tree, represented most clearly by the proximity of the stab wounds believed to be symbolic of the Hebrew letter Shin, which is at the bottom left. Here, we see an illustration made by Rosanoff that shows the placement of the wounds with an overlay of the bottom triangle of the Sephiroth world for illustrative purposes. The photograph of the child Yushinsky is shown for comparative purposes.
You may notice the bottom right section of Yushinsky's temple does have five wounds in close proximity that seem suggestive of this Hebrew letter Shin. Here is the picture of the Hebrew letter Shin for comparison. And here is a magnification of the wounds to Yushinsky's head, which Rosenoff noted are the symbolic depiction of this letter. For illustrative purposes, small lines are drawn from the wounds connecting them together to demonstrate how the kabbalists interpret the symbolic nature of these wounds according to Rosanoff. Even an intelligent skeptic must admit that his findings certainly seem plausible.
Shin is commonly used amongst Kabbalists as shown in this picture of the Hebrew triad. They uses a letter Shin to help signify the three sephiroths. Also, the letter takes important meaning for the middle letter of the word Jesus in Hebrew, or Yehoshua takes on the meaning of man without it. Thus, it is believed that Jews engage in such acts to their deity, not only as an honorable way to attain the Jewish kingdom over the world, but also to prevent the second coming of Christ who they believe would stop their earthly kingdom from occurring. According to Rosanoff, there is even a name given by Hasidic Jews for the entire ritual murder process.
They call it Echad. The Hebrew and Russian equivalent are shown here too. Vailis was freed because only six of the 12 jurors felt he was guilty. A simple majority being required. Too many witnesses were killed and much evidence had been destroyed prior to trial.
Much like OJ Simpson in The US, Vailis was allowed to walk unpunished. Later, he immigrated to The United States where he lived out the rest of his life. Prosecuting attorney, GG Zamoslowski, wrote a 520 page book about this, which was called the murder of Andrei Yushinsky. But the Bolshevik revolution occurred shortly thereafter. Jews participated in Zamoslavsky Kangaroo Court, which was the very first trial of the communist regime.
Zamoslavsky was murdered for having revealed all the facts concerning this matter. His book was then classified until 1997 so that others might not know the truth of this terrible ordeal.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Thread🧵Post 7 Warning ⚠️ Not for sensitive viewers⚠️ The earliest versions of the accusations involving Jews supposedly crucifying Christian children on Easter/Passover is said to be because of a prophecy. The earliest known antecedent is tenth century, from Damocritus (not Democritus the philosopher) mentioned in the Suda,[16] who alleged that "every seven years the Jews captured a stranger, brought him to the temple in Jerusalem, and sacrificed him, cutting his flesh into bits." The Greco-Egyptian author Apion claimed that the Jews sacrificed Greek victims in their temple. Here, the writer states that when Antiochus Epiphanes entered the temple in Jerusalem, he discovered a Greek captive, who told him that he was being fattened for sacrifice. Every year, Apion claimed, the Jews would sacrifice a Greek and consume his flesh, at the same time swearing eternal hatred towards the Greeks.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript recounts a series of alleged Jewish ritual murder accusations and related events, presented as a continuum across decades. It begins with Leo Frank, the Atlanta factory superintendent, who was tried and found guilty of murdering 12-year-old Mary Fagan, described as a gentile girl whose body allegedly bled from a head wound and other parts. After much dispute and funding, Frank was pardoned seventy-three years later; the account asserts the pardon was not due to innocence but because of a lynch mob’s actions and later memory, with claims that Jews sought to portray Frank’s innocence.
The narrative then addresses a 1919 Chicago case in which a Gentile accused Jews of ritual murder of his child, stating it is unclear whether the accusation was true. It references 1928 Massena, New York, where locals alleged ritual murder by Jews of a child who was allegedly lost in the woods, described as an instance of false accusations by Jewish writers. It urges criminal investigators to pursue actions to prevent iniquitous crimes and to protect innocent Jews from maligning.
A 1935 Russian report in Nashput Harbin is cited, alleging a case in Afghanistan where a Mohammed and child were robbed and stabbed by Jews for ritual purposes. The text then cites various figures—Doctor Dahl, Increase Mather, Thomas E. Watson, and Michael, a Lithuanian rabbi converted to Christianity—asserting that Jewish ritual murder has historical roots and that several prominent individuals have written about or supported such acts.
An April 16, 1989 New York Times article about a long-lost skeleton found in a synagogue cellar (Eldridge Street) is described, including ambiguity about whether the remains were male or female and whether the body could be identified as Jewish or Gentile, with a suggestion that if it were a Jewish child, someone within the community would likely know, but investigators had no information.
On May 1, 1989, Oprah Winfrey’s show is described, where a Jewish girl named Rachel testified that her family practiced ritual murder for several generations, including forced participation in infant sacrifice. A 1990 Cult Watch Response is cited, where Rachel reaffirmed the narrative of multi-generational family ritual murder. The text then mentions a 1995 Romanian case where gentile children were reportedly kidnapped for use in occult rights in Israel, involving Mahmoud Assadi, a former Israeli aide, and claims of broader Jewish involvement in such crimes, including alleged blood libel narratives.
The transcript broadens to global claims: reports from Romania, Germany, Italy, Poland, Egypt, Syria, Portugal, Jordan, France, Russia, Austria, Spain, and more alleged ritual murders by Jews; questions are raised about whether there is a global conspiracy against Jews or whether some Jews are conspiring against non-Jews. It cites Richard’s The Myth of Ritual Murder, which contends Jews never use anyone’s blood, while noting other passages about blood used in talismans or for medicinal purposes.
References to Satanism include Anton LaVey as Jewish, and Lord Egan as a leader of a satanic cult, with imagery in video depictions of inter-racial cults and desecration. A German doctor’s and a Russian source’s accounts are cited to describe supposed rituals, mutilations, and confessions under torture that allegedly imply Jewish culpability, especially around Passover, Hanukkah, and Purim, with Purim described as celebrating the murder of Gentiles by Jews. The overall message asserts recurring accusations against Jews of ritual murder and argues such acts occur around major Jewish holidays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At around the same time as the trial of Menachem Mendel by Liz was being given, Leo Frank was tried for the murder of a 12 year old gentile girl Mary Fagan in The United States. Frank was the chapter head of the Atlanta Jewish Society, B'nai Brit, which is Hebrew for brotherhood of the covenant. Frank was found guilty of murdering the young gentile girl. One writer described the child's innocent lifeless body. She bled freely.
Not only from the wound in her head, but from other parts of her body. An objective view of this incident is thoroughly described in the more recent book, The Murder of Little Mary Fagan. Because it is impartial, Jews seem to be disturbed by it. Shortly after Fagan's murder, Jews formed the Anti Defamation League of Britae, which has consistently sought to contain the incident. Jews now say that it was not a Jew who murdered Mary Fagan, but rather a black.
We are expected to believe that a jury in the Deep South in the early nineteen hundreds would let a guilty black man who murdered an innocent white girl go free, so that an innocent white Jew could be convicted of having murdering a gentile child in the most wicked ways imaginable. This of course is utter nonsense. After much haggling and money thrown at the matter, seventy three years after the incident, Jews secured a pardon of Frank. Frank was not pardoned because of his innocence as Jews would have some believe. In fact, Jews had tried to appeal the conviction at the time, but Frank was repeatedly shown to be guilty.
Later, the governor on his way out changed Frank's sentence who was to be punished by death by a court order, to a life sentence. A lynch mob took Frank from jail and hanged him. This is the reason why Frank was pardoned, because of the lynch's mob doing justice's job. Not because of Frank's imagined innocence. Someone supposedly remembered what happened seventy years after the incident, but this contrived memory was probably more based on the individual's inability to purchase a pacemaker to continue living and as Jewish beneficiaries wanting to vindicate their deceased co religionist.
In 1919, a Gentile accused Jews of ritually murdering his child in Chicago. It is not certain whether this event was truly a ritual murder or merely a baseless accusation. In some cases though, certainly not all, Jews are unfairly accused of ritually murdering children. For example, this occurred in 1928 in Massena, New York. When some towns people accused Jews of ritually murdering a child who was in fact merely lost in the woods according to Jewish writers.
People should not jump to conclusions in such matters. Rather criminal investigators should look into these matters and take whatever legal action is necessary to prevent these iniquitous crimes from occurring. And should also see to it that innocent Jews are not malign. In 1935 and the Russian paper, Nashput of Harbin on October 7 reported a case in Afghanistan where Mohammed and child was robbed and riddled with stabs by Jews. The court verdict being that this was done for ritual purposes.
Most people who have investigated these matters were distinguished individuals. Doctor Dahl, who was mentioned earlier, was a well respected linguist and author of Russian's living dictionary, roughly the equivalent of Webster's dictionary for The United States. Many such well respected people as doctor Dahl have said that Jewish ritual murder is true. For instance, increase Mather, an early administrator of Harvard University once said, Jews have been want once a year to steal Christian children and to put them to death by crucifying out of scorn and hatred. Attorney Thomas e Watson publicly promulgated that occult murders among Jews was common.
In 1896 when he ran as third party vice president candidate, his party received over a million votes. Later in 1920, he was elected to the United States Senate. Many others have previously been mentioned. Many Jews who became Christians in the past have written about these murders as well. For instance, Michael, the grand rabbi of Lithuania converted to Christianity described many of these hateful acts perpetrated by Jews.
In doctor Dahl's book, see we many Jewish converts who admitted to the truth of this matter. On the 04/16/1989, an interesting article appeared in the New York Times. While inconclusive, I'd like to read it to you. A long lost skeleton in a synagogue cellar. A dark or in any case bizarre chapter in the otherwise venerable history of the Eldridge Street synagogue on the Lower East Side was reopened yesterday when a long lost skull rolled out from a coal ash pile and struck the foot of a workman.
Soon an entire skeleton was in view. After inspection by a medical examiner, the bones were taken to the 5th Precinct Station house. The official word from the police was that they could not identify the body or determine its sex. It had apparently been in the cellar more than thirty years. The unofficial word according to Betty Sandler, administrative director of the Eldridge Street project was that it might be a young girl in her late teens or early twenties, which would make for an unsavory story.
Workers are excavating the cellar of the 102 year old synagogue between Canal And Division Streets in the first phase of its restoration. Not the faintest rumor or oldest law explains the skeleton. Judge Paul p e Books in of civil court who has worshipped the synagogue for three decades said, he had absolutely no information, no inkling as to who it might be or how it came to be there. Now think about this. How could a child's skeleton just be found in a coal pile in a Jewish synagogue's basement?
If the corpse was that of a Jewish child being that Jewish communities are usually pretty tightly knit, it seems likely that someone at the synagogue would have known who was killed. But they had absolutely no information, no inkling about whose corpse was discovered. So it stands to reason that it was not a Jew. So why would the skeleton of a Gentile be discovered in a synagogue's basement? This a valid question and it certainly deserves a valid response.
But it seems that those who were investigating the matter simply dismissed it for reasons that only they will know. Also, why did it say that the investigators could not determine its sex for certain? This would be a relatively simple task for a medical examiner. Yet it seems that even this was not given proper attention. One cannot say that with any certainty that the remains were that of a child who was ritually murdered.
But it does seem like a matter that still needs proper attention by police investigators. Merely a month later, something else interesting occurred in 1989.
Speaker 1: On 05/01/1989, viewers of the Oprah Winfrey Show, a very famous television program, were in for quite a surprise. Oprah interviewed a young Jewish girl named Rachel who testified on the program that her family had for several generations engaged in the practice of ritual murder.
Speaker 0: On the show doctor Rome sites, Oprah asked the woman, this is the first time I've heard of any Jewish people sacrificing babies. But anyway, so you witness the sacrifice? Rachel responded, right. When I was young, I was forced to participate in that, in which I had to sacrifice an infant. When Oprah Winfrey asked if other Jews had engaged in such practices, practices, Oprah Rachel responded, there's other Jewish families across the country.
It's not just my family. Rachel then proceeded to mention other relatives, doctors, policemen, council members, and so forth who had also reportedly engaged in this cult activity. A year later, in 1990, Rachel again bravely stepped forward and admitted that this terrible deed had occurred as noted in the March 1990 issue of Cult Watch Response. Recently, I had enough courage to share some of my story. I revealed that I am a Jewish survivor of a multi generational family who practiced human sacrifice and cannibalism.
It seems likely that if the transgenerational Jewish ritual murder cult has survived, that such actions would most likely occur in Israel where many fanatical Jews reside. Of my friends now. A few years later in 1995, some gentile children from Romania were found being reportedly kidnapped and exported to Israel. Israeli citizen Mahmoud Assadi was arrested for this. He was at one time former Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin's personal secretary according to the World Jewish Congress.
Certainly, he would not have been acting alone in this matter as it would be something that will require many people to do. Why would he be in Romania procuring gentile children? Some have suggested that the children were to be used in occult rights by Jews. Again, this is a question that deserves our utmost attention. Reporter Adel Hamoud writing in the major Egyptian newspaper Al Haram of 10/28/2000 said that young Palestinian children have been repeatedly found around Israel with their blood drained.
He reported these startling findings in a full page article called Jews make matzos from the Arabs blood. Jews in Israel regularly demonstrate that they possess this ancient hatred. Recently Israeli planes dropped bombs on a school for the blind in Palestine. And some Jewish extremists put a bomb on a school children's playground. Certainly, Jewish fanatics who commit such cruel acts are capable of ritually murdering children in Palestine as well.
Romania, Germany, Italy, Poland, United States, Egypt, Syria, Portugal, Jordan, France, Russia, Austria, Spain, nearly every civilization in the entire world has reported the crime of Jewish ritual murders. Has the entire world been involved in a massive conspiracy against Jews? Or have some fanatical Jews been engaged in a conspiracy against all non Jews? Quite frankly, it seems to be the latter. Some Jews say the Jews are completely innocent.
For instance, Jewish scholar, Richard writes in his book, The Myth of Ritual Murder, the Jews never use any blood even that of an animal. On page eight, however, contradicting himself on the very next page he says, in medieval and early modern times among oriental Jews, the blood of circumcision was used for writing the Tetragrammaton on talismans. On that same page, also noticed that the rabbi's responsa said to use dried goat's blood as a general medicine. This certainly makes it seem as if there was some relationship to occultism in the past. There does seem to be an ancient relationship between Jews and occultism in the past up to this very day.
As surprising as it may be, the founder of modern day satanism, Anton LaVey, is Jewish. Also Lord Egan, is a leader of satanic cult, is also Jewish. If you look at the satanic pentagram with the demon Befomet in the center, an imaginary demon from ancient times, you'll see Hebrew characters that surrounded as well. In the current video, faces of death, you'll see an inter racial cult which appears to be led by a Jew, cut up a corpse, and then have an orgy in its blood. Such sickness defies belief.
Doctor Vladimir Dahl, who we mentioned earlier, was asked to write his book, Notes About the Ritual Murders for the Russian Government. And he mentioned many of the sick occult rites of the ritual murders of the past. Dahl was able to find out quite a lot about these acts. While his book was written long ago, there are still many relevant points that are still applicable today. He describes these terrible acts by hate mongering Jews and the typical Jewish response.
It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of committing such deplorable acts. Jews were accused many times of that in courts by a variety of people. On the whole, it was not only their own confession in addition to other evidence, but there were such examples where the Jews were exposed and consequently had recognized themselves as being true. Just one such event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real real existence of such villainous human mutilation. But the defenders of Jews say something quite different.
The confessions were forced by torture and therefore proves nothing. Assuming however this argument is true too and believing all that was ever said and written on this problem in favor of Jews with the respect to forced confessions. There is still one circumstance that will remain which has never paid enough attention. This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews, but also is the proof of the crime itself. Namely, it is not doubtful that from time to time the corpses of babies who were missing were eventually discovered in such distorted conditions and with such signs of external violence that they attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths.
This is the kind of murder for which the Jews are accused. Also the incidents of this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews live. We must ask ourselves in what type of circumstance can we attribute the renewed cases of babies who suffered painful deaths? Babies who were carefully tortured up to the point of their tragic deaths if an accusation is not fair? What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a baby if it is not done for religious mutilation.
The external signs on corpses indicate each time this is discovered positively that the death could not be accidental in any case but intentional. It is obvious that these injuries sustained by the babies are deliberately done and take place over a long time. The whole body is poked or pricked. Then scraps of skin are cut. The tongue was often cut out.
The intimate parts of boys are either cut out or the boys were circumcised. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put on and removed again are not uncommon. Often the entire skin has abrasions as if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it. Sometimes the corpse was even washed with it being discovered without any blood on it. Nor was there any blood on the undergarments demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and afterwards put on again.
The parents and siblings of babies who have experienced such tragic deaths wonder. For what possible reason would people commit such deplorable acts to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it could never be done. And it continues to happen repeatedly over time. The ordinary killer in any case would be satisfied with one murder.
But a murderer who kills for some type of mysterious important purpose cannot be ignored here. The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of Jews, their impudent and stubborn stubborn denials, denials, not infrequently bribery. The confidence by the majority of educated people and that an accusation is merely infamous slander. And finally, the humanity of our criminal laws. All these things saved the Jewish culprits nearly every time from deserved execution.
And they, by using their machinations, by giving false oath assurances of innocence, and by using false propaganda that suggested such accusations were merely the result of accomplished injustice with slander built on them, almost always were well prepared for such accusations. The Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence against them. You might ask when these fanatical Jews are said to have engaged in such wicked behavior. Typically, these Jewish sacrificial events usually occurred around the time holiday of Passover, which has an underlying message of deeply imbued pathological hatred towards Gentiles. Similar claims be made around Hanukkah, a Jewish militant militant holiday.
Purim is also another Jewish holiday on which Gentile children are said to disappear, only to be found later mutilated. Purim celebrates when in history Jews were able to murder a noble gentile. Haman, his wife, his children, and also murdered thousands of other gentiles who sought to put an end to wicked acts perpetrated by Jews who were criminals.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 8 Warning ⚠️ Not for sensitive viewers⚠️ Much like the blood🩸libel of England 🏴 , the history of blood libel in continental Europe consists of unsubstantiated claims made about the corpses of Christian ✝️children. There were frequently associated supernatural events speculated about these discoveries and corpses, events which were often attributed by contemporaries to miracles. Also, just as in England, these accusations in continental Europe typically resulted in the execution of numerous Jews – sometimes even all, or close to all, the Jews in one town. These accusations and their effects also, in some cases, led to royal interference on behalf of the Jews.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript argues that Jewish ritual murder has occurred globally, drawing parallels to historical massacres and Purim rituals, and asserts that Jews have long suppressed discussion of such crimes. It claims that the wholesale slaughter of Gentiles in a village was perpetrated by a band of Jewish cutthroats at night rather than angels, and links this pattern to Passover, describing angels as having murdered non-Jews with blood-written homes. It states that ritual murders reportedly occur around Passover, and raises the question of why these crimes aren’t more widely discussed, suggesting that the truth may surprise many.
The speaker asserts that Jews control the media, stating that “Jews control the press and television and radio,” and that discussions of ritual murder are suppressed. It cites as early as 1916 Thomas Burbage, who allegedly wrote that via the press, Jews’ great wealth enables them to stifle impartial investigations into ritual murder. The claim extends to Internet sources validating Jewish control of media, and asserts that even Jewish-named news sources suppress mentions of ritual murder. An example given is a 1996 Newsweek article described as a “new kind of blood libel” about Israelis mishandling Black Jews’ blood; a scathing letter from B’nai B’rith president Tommy Bauer allegedly demanded an apology for the article.
The transcript also claims Zionist pressure over press content abroad, referencing pressure on Egyptians to retract an article about a reported Jewish ritual murder mentioned in Al Haram, and describing a push to withhold aid unless the Egyptian editor apologized and the article was repudiated. It mentions a “slush fund” called the Alilat Seeker or fund for bloody calumnies, allegedly used to defend against blood libel accusations, with a claim that a gentile child’s disappearance could be redeemed by Jewish blood or money.
It further contends that Jews employ psychological barriers, such as exaggerating German actions in World War II while avoiding discussion of Bolshevik revolution, which the speaker claims involved a Jewish dominance and the murder of over 40,000,000 Gentile Russians—described as the greatest mass Jewish ritual murders. The speaker cites Jewish authors and works to illustrate a pattern of rhetoric: Gavin Langmuir’s notion that antisemitism is a pejorative term used as a weapon in political discourse; the idea that “truth is antisemitic” when lending credence to claims about Jews.
The transcript lists numerous works and authors—Doctor Arnold Lees’ Jewish ritual murder, Doctor Helmut Schramm’s Jewish ritual murder, Debacle in Damascus by Doctor Harold Rome, Michael Hoffman, Doctor Ed Fields, Doctor James Warner, Doctor A. Jessup, Sir William Norwich’s life (translated by A. Jessup), Doctor William Sharp in the New York State Journal of Medicine (11/01/1971), Doctor Mustafa Talas’ The Matzah of Zion, Doctor Philip DeVoe’s Blood Ritual, and a video about “Human sacrifice among the fanatical Hasidic Jews.” It references Russian prosecutor GG Samuslowski’s 500-page case of a Jewish ritual murder, and Vladimir Dahl’s work as well.
The speaker claims there are many other writers from popes to attorneys and doctors attesting to the validity of these accusations, but questions how often ritual murders occur since no such records are kept, alleging secrecy among Jewish occult circles. It asserts the FBI’s missing persons statistics (76,213 in February, with about 400,000 children) suggest many victims go uninvestigated, and warns to “keep a close eye on your children,” especially around Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah, advising to monitor children’s whereabouts during Jewish holidays and in areas visited by Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This might be viewed as similar to what occurred to the good czar of Russia, his wife, his son who was sick, his daughters, and all the other relatives, not to mention over 40,000,000 other Russians. Of course, Jews now vehemently deny having anything to do with this, but the records speak for themselves. It seems to follow the ancient lines of this Purim, a festival that is commonly associated with ritual murders by Jewish fanatics in the past. Passover is celebrated amongst Jews when angels supposedly came through a city in ancient times and murdered all non Jews who didn't have an x written in blood on their homes. In all actuality, it seems likely that the wholesale slaughter of Gentiles in the village was perpetrated by a band of Jewish cutthroats at night rather than angels.
Many ritual murders also reportedly occurred around the time of Passover. There is a question which remains to be asked. If what I have said so far about Jewish occult murder having occurred around the globe is true, why don't we hear more about these crimes? Well, that is a fair question. The truth of the matter might also surprise some here today.
Jews control the media for the most part. Jews say that such talk is merely hateful anti Semitism, but it is not. Rather, it is a fact with which we must deal. As early as 1916, we see well respected Thomas Burbage write that by means of the press, the Jews control and their great wealth, Jews are able to stifle any impartial investigation into ritual murder. One need only to search the Internet to find the validity validity that Jews for the most part do control the press and television and radio too for that matter.
As noted previously, Jews try to suppress any talk about Jewish ritual murder. This includes even other Jewish news sources that mention this. And even when it might be only a vague reference. For example, in 1996, Newsweek merely used the term blood libel in an article. The article was called called a new kind of blood libel.
It was not about Jews committing ritual murders, but about Israelis mishandling black Jews blood. On 02/12/1996, B'nai Brit president, Tommy Bauer, wrote Newsweek a scathing letter which said, I trust that you will issue an explanation and an apology for this gross error of judgment. Even in foreign nations, Jews try to control what people write. The Zionist Organization of America pressured the Egyptians to retract the aforementioned article about a reported Jewish ritual murder that had reportedly occurred and was mentioned in the newspaper Al Haram, lest America purportedly refrain from giving the Egyptians any aid. The Zionist Organization of America president Morton a Klein wrote, we urge congress to refrain from considering the Clinton administration's proposal for $225,000,000 in extra aid to Egypt until the Mubarak government publicly apologizes and repudiates the blood libel article and replaces the editor responsible for its publication.
Jews reportedly even had what is called a slush fund to defend themselves in court and such. Doctor Deveer's book writes about this. Ali Lut Seeker, a slush fund in today's terms provide a bribe money and expenses to combat blood accusations. Doctor Rome then proves this by citing Jewish author Leon Poliakoff's book, The History of Antisemitism. The disappearance of a gentile child had to be redeemed by Jewish blood or at least by Jewish money, which sometimes permitted the matter to be dropped.
The secret fund, the Alilat Seeker, the fund for bloody calumnies, set up by the council of the four nations served chiefly for this purpose. Another way that Jews tried to stifle debate on this topic is through psychological barriers. Jews do this by exaggerating events of World War two Germany and trying to keep such thoughts fresh in our minds. At the same time, Jews tried to avoid talk of the Bolshevik revolution, which Jews were overwhelmingly dominant and which resulted in the murder of over 40,000,000 Gentile Russians. In a sense, this was the greatest number of Jewish ritual murders to occur on mass.
Even if the hateful acts were not performed in the Jewish traditional manner, since it was an act based on Jewish contempt, superiority, and utilized their semantic mind games that they have employed for countless generations. An example of these psychological games that Jews play can be seen in many respected Jewish works. For example, Jewish author Gavin Langmuir writes in his book Towards a Definition of Antisemitism, Not only are Jews good in their eyes, but they are now seem as no worse than or as good as anyone else in the West. Consequently, antisemitism is now understood as a highly pejorative term both by Jews and many non Jews. Which is what makes the charge of antisemitism loosely defined, so useful a weapon in political discourse.
So long as memories of the final solution remain vivid, the use of that special term of dark origin implies that there is something unusually and uniquely evil about any serious hostility towards all Jews. As you noticed, he said that this term of anti semitism is useful as a weapon and political discourse. Hence, it seems he is suggesting that Jews use a psychological guilt trip on anyone who disagrees with them, which is what happens in politics. This is one of the reasons that people should not waste time refuting ignorant Jewish arguments when Jews apply the term anti semite. Anyone who tells the truth in relation to the reprehensible acts committed by Jews will be labeled as such.
The fact that Jews play such insipid little games should simply be accepted and merely ignored. Responding to such claims with a what ever rather than fall into their dull mind games, and wasting time refuting their lives with the obvious truth that contradicts their claims. Truth is antisemitic according to Jews. If they do not like the way it reflects on them. And what is the truth?
There are many such works that spell out all the nefarious details of these wicked crimes. Jewish ritual murder by doctor Arnold Lees, and there is another book by the same name, Jewish ritual murder by Doctor. Helmut Schramm, which also describes this and has recently been translated into English and is available on a CD. There is a booklet by Doctor. Harold Rome called Debacle in Damascus.
Well respected writer Michael Hoffman wrote about this in one of his newsletters. Doctor Ed Fields dedicated an older issue of his newspaper about this. Doctor James Warner has reproduced an older German newspaper about this. Doctor A Jessup's translation of the life of Sir William Norwich is an interesting book. Doctor William Sharp also wrote about the murder of William in an article that appeared in the New York State Journal of Medicine of the 11/01/1971.
Doctor Mustafa Talas' book, The Matzah of Zion, tells about the ritual murder of father Thomas. Doctor Philip DeVea has written recently a book called Blood Ritual. There is another video tape if you can find it, which shows numerous rare pictures, woodcuts, and drawings of Jewish ritual murders called Human sacrifice among the fanatical Hasidic Jews from the ancient times to the present. Russian prosecutor and Duma member, GG Samuslowski wrote an excellent 500 or more page book that told all the details of one case in which a jury determined there had been a Jewish ritual murder. Doctor Vladimir Dahl's book is also an excellent resource and much of which contained in this video was derived from his excellent resource.
There are many other writers from popes to attorneys to numerous other doctors and researchers who attest to the validity of Jewish ritual murder accusations. You might wonder how often do ritual murders occur? This is question that cannot honestly be answered because no such tabs are kept. Such actions must certainly be kept secretive amongst Jewish occults, less people put an end to their despicable activities. Obviously since the FBI is indoctrinated by the Jewish anti defamation league at the holocaust museum, they will not dare to question their masters.
It is doubtful that law enforcement even bother to determine why non Jewish construction works in a synagogue basement in 1989 discovered a child's skeleton? How many victims are not properly investigated because Jews are believed incapable of such wicked acts? There are some alarming facts that are known. According to the FBI, in the year February 76,213 people went missing. Now, not all of them were children, but quite a few were, seven hundred and fifty thousand.
Of that figure, around half of them, 354,000 to be precise, were abducted by other members of their family. This still leaves quite a number, 400,000 children. The equivalent of over a thousand children per day go missing. Of course, it seems likely the many have run away from their homes and others may be abandoned. But what happened to the others?
Some of these children are kidnapped and never seen again. This occurs to at least several thousand a year. And what happens to them? Are they abducted by predators? Please keep a close eye on your children.
In particular, watch out for the events of Passover, Purim, and Hanukkah. Do not let your children wander far away, particularly in areas visited by Jews during their Jewish holidays.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 9 Fun fact: Google's most recent browser released Sept 2008 is named CHROME: Google's GPU (Graphics Processing Unit), Released 2009 is named ADRENO: 🤔 Sources/Further Reading https://themikerothschild.com/2018/07/09/adrenochrome-qanon/ https://www.britannica.com/science/ adrenochrome https://www.henrymakow.com/2013/05/the-damascus-affair.html The Statute of Kalisz’s Great Legacy | Filip Mazurczak | First Things https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Disclaimer: I may or may not agree with all, none or some of the information provided. The information provided is for educational/entertainment purposes. It is only meant to share some possible knowledge and history you may or may not know….. If you like to post, feel free to share 🙏🏽 Freedom Forever! 🇺🇸🫡 X would not let me share the original link from Rumble….interesting 🤔 but not really.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Video source: https://rumble.com/v1j9pjx-child-sacrifice-by-jews-a-secret-forbidden-history-jewish-ritual-murder-ful.html
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@threadreaderapp @hmz23 🫡
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Cindy08331653 @TheRubberDuck79 Bingo 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@CynthiaThi18042 👌🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@TaraBella1111 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@ValerieAnne307 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@BellacheAcc Interesting
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Fightingfo50615 Yup
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Columcilled 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@StellaMendonca 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@holYmOL322 @DeepValueInvst 🙏🏽 you’re welcome
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@DeepValueInvst 🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@ericjhughes81 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@GiseleR90169843 Sick
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Epstein is the tip of the IceBERG. Jim Caviezel talks about Adrenochrome. “These people that do it, there will be no mercy for them” Thread 🧵 in comments https://t.co/2Elskpgsdh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that adrenaline is produced in the body when you are scared. If a child knows he's going to die, his body will secrete this adrenaline. They describe it as the worst horror they've ever seen, noting that the screaming alone is overwhelming. And they say there’ll be no mercy for the people who do it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Essentially, you have adrenaline in your body. I'll just simplify it. And and when you are scared, you produce adrenaline. If a child knows he's going to die, his body will, secrete this adrenaline. It's the worst horror I've ever seen, the screaming alone, even if I never ever ever ever saw it.
It's beyond, and these people that do it, there'll be no mercy for them.
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a thread about alleged rare footage of Bolshevik Jews destroying churches, and a claim that 85% of the Bolshevik government were Jewish. It references sources and a poster @Gentilenewsnet. Replies range from labeling it a Jewish revolution or anti-Christian sentiment to expressions of shock, curiosity, and thanks for seeking “unheard history.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“Rare historical footages of Bolshevik jews destroying Russian Orthodox Churches and during the Russian Revolution.” For educational/historical purposes only https://t.co/7XMlnmju3q
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Putin: “85% of the Bolshevik government were jewish.” https://t.co/YnQQsHMGbv
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says that the decision to nationalize this library was made by the first Soviet government, and its members were approximately 80-85 percent Jewish. They note that these leaders, guided by false ideological considerations, engaged in arrests and repressments of Jews, as well as Orthodox Christians and followers of other faiths, Muslims. They assert that they swept everyone under one brush. The speaker highlights that these ideological blinds and false ideological attitudes, they, thank God, ... (the sentence is left unfinished in the transcript).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Решение о национализации этой библиотеки было принято первым советским правительством, и членами его являлись примерно 80-85 процентов евреи. Но они же, руководствуясь ложными идеологическими соображениями, шли тогда на аресты и репрессии и иудеев, и православных, и представителей других конфессий, мусульман. Они всех гребли под одну гребенку. И вот эти идеологические шоры и ложные идеологические установки, они, слава богу,
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Sources below. https://t.co/bsJ9TwdO7y
@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲
@Gentilenewsnet https://t.co/SQEcgHtatH https://t.co/Nn9PxGsedi https://t.co/OWH8OEDz08 https://t.co/xWCHOxaECx
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@MattyWhack1976 It’s all the jewish revolution
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@zadokq244514 They hate Christians.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@AmericanTimdog Such an unheard tragedy
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@TruthNoticing @VoxExVeritas Weird
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@wrathoconn Many do not know that
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@TruthNoticing @VoxExVeritas Thank for posting 🫡
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@AchilleVVV 🫡
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@ItsMissShorty 🙏🏽 Thank you for having a mind open enough to seek unheard history.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Bri_Stryker For sure
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Zarmozg Lol. Yes 👍🏼
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“An Encyclopedia Of Rapid Fire Facts On Jewish History Since World War II up to the Argentina Fires Today…In Under 7 Minuites.” -A Based Opinion. https://t.co/ILityde7et
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a rapid-fire accumulation of allegations about Zionist Jewish supremacists allegedly infecting global affairs. The core themes include a claimed cancerous, lasting influence beginning in the 1800s and modernized by Theodore Herzl in 1897, with asserted connections to current events in Argentina and beyond.
Key points and claims outlined:
- Argentina: Zionist influence is described as expanding, with Israeli tourists allegedly starting wildfires and a “treasonous Zionist rat bastard” president of Argentina, who is said to collude with Israelis to turn Argentina into “another little Israel” and to burn land for land acquisition. The claim is that Zionists have long eyed Argentina since inception, with early Zionist leaders like Herzl considering Argentina due to fertile land and open immigration, and Jewish agricultural colonies already established there in the late 1800s. There is asserted “mass influx of Israelis, including IOF soldiers,” moving to Argentina as a Jewish homeland, with Israel destroying Argentina “before our eyes.”
- Historical trajectory: The Havara transfer agreement is cited as Zionists collaborating with the Nazi government to enable German Jews to immigrate to Palestine in 1933, with about 60,000 German Jews moving to Palestine between 1933 and 1939. Israel’s creation in 1948 is stated, followed by the formation of the PLO in 1964. Israel’s occupation of East Jerusalem and the West Bank in 1967 is linked to the formation of Hat Ma’as in 1987. Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1978 is tied to Hezbollah’s formation in 1982.
- U.S. political angle: JFK’s purported order for the American Zionist Council (APAC) to register as an agent of a foreign government in 1962, and JFK’s assassination in 1963, are listed as connected events.
- Africa and Congo: Israel allegedly built up Rwandan forces from 1963–1973, supplied weapons to the Hutu regime through 1994, with the 1994 Rwandan Genocide described as a consequence. A 1997 claim states Israel sent Dan Gribler to Congo to establish diamond mining and oil deals, and that Israel provided weapons to Congo militias, contributing to the First Congo War.
- U.S. conflicts and leadership: Netanyahu is described as authoring a 1995 book predicting a World Trade Center bombing by Islamic militants; nine/eleven is claimed to have occurred with Mossad celebrated in 2001. Netanyahu is also said to have pressured the U.S. to attack Iraq in 2002 over non-existent WMDs, resulting in the 2003 invasion and over a million civilian deaths. A pattern is asserted of Israel pushing the U.S. to invade other countries, including Venezuela, with ongoing Middle East wars since 1948 and continuing into the present.
- Iran and Gaza: Claims of unprovoked Israeli bombings of Iran and Mossad operations to demonize Islam are asserted, along with the destruction of mosques and attempts to install a Zionist-friendly public government in Iran with U.S. support.
- Gaza and Palestine: Israel’s “livestream holocaust” in Gaza, “ethnically cleansing” Palestinians, and land theft across Palestine for a “greater Israel” are described as ongoing for decades.
- Pedophilia and crime allegations: Israel is accused of hosting extensive human trafficking networks, including sex trafficking and organ trafficking involving Palestinians, and being linked to high-profile figures like Bernie Madoff as an example of Jewish supremacist criminality.
- Global influence and control: Israel is described as a haven for pedophiles, rapists, and embezzlers, with claims that Israeli influence pervades governments, news networks, social media, entertainment, banks, real estate, and tax dollars; Israelis’ sports fans are labeled terrorists who sing about rape.
- Call to action: The speaker condemns silence and advocates uniting against a common enemy, proposing to force them out of power by voting or other means, asserting a numerical advantage over those labeled as “the chosen ones.”
Overall, the content weaves conspiracy theories about Zionist control of global events, historical provocations attributed to Israeli actors, and a dangerous, inflammatory call to action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Buckle up. I'm about to rapid fire on how Zionist Jewish supremacist tentacles have been metastasizing and infecting our planet in practically every major conflict in our modern era, which starts from their cancerous inception in the eighteen hundreds and then modernized by Theodore Herzl in 1897. You guys are all hearing about the wildfires in Argentina being started by Israeli tourists, all with the backing of this treasonous Zionist rat bastard who happens to be the Trump and Israel loving president of Argentina, colluding with Israelis to make Argentina yet another little Israel as they burned down one of the most beautiful regions in our planet so that they can take the land at pennies to the dollar. Did you know that the Zionists have always been eyeing Argentina since their inception? Some early Zionist leaders, including Theodore Herzl, considered Argentina a potential location for a Jewish state due to its fertile land and openness to immigrants with Jewish agricultural colonies already established there in the late eighteen hundreds.
We're fast forward to now. There is a massive influx of Israelis, including IOF soldiers that have moved to Argentina as their Jewish home. Israel is destroying Argentina right before our eyes. And don't you dare say this comes as a surprise to you now because everything they touch becomes infected and destroyed. Don't believe me yet.
Here's a historical rundown. Zionists worked with the Nazi government to forge the Havara transfer agreement, facilitating the traitorous mass murder of their fellow Jews and the immigration of German Jews to Palestine in 1933. 60,000 German Jews immigrated to Palestine between 1933 and 1939. Israel was forcibly created in 1948. As a result, the Palestine Liberation Organization, the PLO, was formed in 1964.
Israel occupied an annexed Dazep and the West Bank in 1967. As a result, Hat Maas was then formed in 1987. Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978. As a result, Lebanon's Hezbollah was formed in 1982. JFK ordered the American Zionist Council, now called APAC, to register as an agent of a foreign government in 1962.
JFK was assassinated in 1963. Israel built up the Rwandan forces from 1963 to 1973 and provided weapons to the Hutu regime through 1994. The Hutu power government of Rwanda perpetrated one of the worst genocides in history in 1994. Israel sends Jewish supremacist Dan Gribler to establish diamond mining and oil deals in The Congo in 1997, while Israel also provided weapons to Congo militias. As a result, the first Congo war occurs in 1997.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu authors a book in 1995 where he predicts Islamic militants will plant a bomb in the World Trade Center. Nine eleven happens while Israeli Mossad watch and infamously dance in celebration back in 2,001. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu demands that The US attack Iraq in 2002 over WMDs that never existed. As a result, US invades Iraq thousand three and kills over 1,000,000 civilians. And just like the Iraq playbook, Israel pushes for The US to invade Venezuela this year, and you already know the outcome of that.
Israel starts practically every single war in The Middle East since 1948 or just last year and even some of these countries into this year. Israel simultaneously bombed Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Qatar, and Iran. And speaking of Iran, aside from the several unprovoked Israeli bombings, Israel has sent their terrorist Mossad into Iran to wreak havoc and demonize Islam through hate fueled protests and false flags while they are literally destroying and burning mosques as we speak, trying to make it seem like Iran as a whole is against their leaders when that is not the case in the slightest. It is just a ploy to overthrow the current leadership and install a Zionist loving public government, all courtesy of The US and Israel. And as we all know, Israel has been committing a livestream holocaust in Gaza and destroying the West Bank and stealing land all across Palestine for not just over two years and counting, but for over seventy seven years as their demonic ethno state is still disregarding this bullshit ceasefire that doesn't exist while they continue to ethnically cleanse the population and steal the land until they establish their greater Israel.
Israel is known to be the haven of pedophiles and rapists with their supreme pedophile and rapist Jeffrey Epstein infiltrating our country to blackmail and control politicians on every side of the aisle, only to find out that most of our own leaders are pedophiles and rapists just like him in an endless cycle of pedophiles and rapists that are protecting each other from repercussion. Israelis and their fellow Jewish supremacists all over the world are known to have some of the largest networks of human sex trafficking on the entire planet with even their head of cybersecurity being caught for pedophiling in Vegas before our pedophile in chief let him run away to the haven of pedophiles. Israel is known to have one of the largest networks of organ trafficking on Earth as they traffic Palestinian organs and tout that they have the largest skin bank on the planet, which predominantly consists of Palestinian skin. Jewish supremacists are notoriously known to be the premier thieves and embezzlers of the finance industry with one of the most famous being, the Zionist Bernie Madoff, where he stole from his own in the largest Ponzi scheme in history, taking money from Israeli and Jewish organizations.
Israel is known to mass murder animals and use a monic torture of humans. Israelis are fleeing by the masses and tormenting places like Thailand and Cyprus, where they are literally building settlements and driving the natives out of their homes. And we're clearly seeing what they are also doing to Argentina as we speak. Their sports fans are terrorists who sing about rape as they travel around the world terrorizing city to city while supporting their terrorist soccer club. And this is why I'm not even remotely touching on the fact that they continuously spit on international law and mock the ICJ and ICC, the highest courts of the land, while they control our governments, news networks, social media platforms, entertainment, banks, real estate, and tax dollars.
Say all of this to you in broad daylight that they are the chosen ones, and we are all going or non Jewish animals that don't deserve what they deserve, which is essentially a privileged life where they can walk around and do whatever the fuck they want unchecked, which is exactly what we are watching today and have been watching for decades. The infuriating thing about this is that we are just watching and letting this all happen year after year. When will we all just stand up and realize that there has been one common enemy that we can all unite against? First step is to force them out of power, whether it's through votes or other means. We far outnumber the chosen ones.
So it's time we choose the ones that serve no purpose in our society. You know exactly what I mean.
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the Epstein files reveal material larger than abuse videos involving the powerful, framed as an operation rather than a scandal. It asks who leads organ trafficking, safe havens for Pdfiles, Epstein’s employers, and Lev Tahor’s scale. It notes surveillance can find Osama but not missing kids, suggesting deep power protection. It questions why this truth is released now and why society isn’t rising as a result.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
The Epstein files describe material so extreme it goes beyond "abuse" videos involving the world's most powerful men and women. This wasn't a scandal. It was an operation. • What country leads the world in organ trafficking? • What country is a safe haven for Pdfiles? • What country did Epstein work for? • Jewish sect Lev Tahor is one of if not the "biggest" trafficking operations globally in terms of overall scale or volume of victims compared to major international trafficking rings” Is amazing how they can use surveillance and satellites to help find Osama bin Laden through a window capturing his shadow, but they can’t use one of those surveillance satellites to help locate millions of missing kids. Because they don’t care. And the reason the truth feels unreal is because it exposes how deep power is willing to sink and how long it has been protected. They kept this from you for years, why? Why release it now? In a normal society, this would be reason for another insurrection or worse but we don’t live in a normal society.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that more than 3,000,000 pages, including more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, were produced, totaling approximately three and a half million pages in compliance with the act. The 2,000 videos and 180,000 images are not all videos and images taken by Mr. Epstein or someone around him; they include large quantities of commercial pornography and images seized from Epstein's devices, but which he did not take or that someone around him did not take. Some of the videos and some of the images do appear to be taken by Mr. Epstein or by others around him.
The department’s document identification and review protocols consisted of multiple layers of review and quality control designed to ensure compliance under the act and protect victims. In addition to the department’s review protocols, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York employed an additional review protocol to ensure compliance with a court order requiring United States Attorney Jay Clayton to certify that with respect to certain materials, a large quantity of the materials, a rigorous process was undertaken to protect victims against any clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy. The department’s collection effort resulted in more than 6,000,000 pages being identified as potentially responsive, including department and FBI emails, interview summaries, images, videos, and various other materials collected and generated during the investigations and prosecutions that the act covered.
They erred on the side of overcollecting materials from various sources to best ensure maximum transparency and compliance, which necessarily means that the number of responsive pages is significantly smaller than the total number of pages initially collected. That is why they mentioned releasing more than 3,000,000 pages today and not the 6,000,000 pages that were collected.
They address what they didn’t produce. The categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld: files that contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files, and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contains images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secrets in the interest of national security or foreign policy,
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we are producing more than 3,000,000 pages, including more than 2,000 videos and a 180,000 images. In total, that means that the department produced approximately three and a half million pages in compliance with the act. Just a quick note about the the videos and images. The 2,000 videos and a 180,000 images are not all videos and images taken by, mister Epstein or someone around him. They include large quantities of commercial pornography and images that were seized from Epstein's devices, but which he did not take or that someone around him did not take.
Some of the videos though and some of the images do appear to be taken by mister Epstein or by others around him. Now I wanna talk for a few minutes about the department's document identification and review protocols. It consisted of multiple layers of review and quality control designed to ensure compliance under the act and protect, victims. On top of the review protocols that the department had in place, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York employed an additional review protocol to ensure compliance with a court order requiring United States Attorney Jay Clayton to certify that with respect to certain materials, a large quantity of the materials, a rigorous process was undertaken to protect victims against any clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy. The department's collection effort resulted in more than 6,000,000 pages being identified as potentially responsive, including department and FBI emails, interview summaries, images, videos, and various other materials collected and generated during the various investigations and prosecutions that the act covered.
We erred on the side of overcollecting of materials from various sources to best ensure ensure maximum transparency and compliance, which necessarily means that the number of responsive pages is significantly smaller than the total number of pages initially collected. That's why I mentioned a moment ago, we're releasing more than 3,000,000 pages today and not the the 6,000,000 pages that that we that we collected. I wanna address what we didn't produce. The the categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld. Files that contain personal personally identify information of victims or victims' personal and medical files, and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secrets in the interest of national security or foreign policy,
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a thread describing a Patryk Vega film that alleges satanic elites enslave, abuse, and even harvest organs from children and newborns. It paints a businesslike network with private jets, a routine medical team, and organized transplants. It links the abuse to top figures like Epstein and broad centers like Ukraine and Israel, urging readers to share and expose the darkness.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 1/7🧵 ▪️EYES OF THE DEVIL▪️ A big bitter pill💊…….. You can rest assured that no matter your level of knowledge on the subject, you may come out of this film a different person. Although there are no images in this documentary, there is descriptive language. ⚠️WARNING⚠️ Viewer discretion is advised. May be sensitive to some viewers. Polish filmmaker Patryk Vega released this film exposing satanic elites, & the enslavement, r@pe, torture, & death of not only children, but even newborns. “They pay a fortune to spend time with a CHILD. Everything’s arranged with a medical team. They know the child will not survive” Post 2 👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on a documentary-like investigation into child trafficking, including the sale of babies for organs and for prostitution, and the operational mechanics of trafficking rings in Europe.
- The conversation opens with a debate about the worst fate for a child, with pedophilia deemed the “worst option,” but there is a tension about judging a parent who might sell their child. The speakers acknowledge they want to remove a problem and question the significance of the child’s fate.
- A narrator explains encountering a girl willing to sell her child to a brothel or as an organ donor, and aims to save her while documenting the process. The girl was relocated from a criminal environment to a different town, but remained controlled by an agent who wanted to sell her child. The sale is described as foiled by the COVID-19 pandemic and border restrictions.
- When the pregnancy is discovered, the pregnant young woman seeks a solution and believes she cannot keep the child, framing it as the best possible decision under the circumstances. The trafficking network involves a well-known criminal underworld contact who is told there is a child for sale and who can help.
- The interview reveals that in Germany, small children are sometimes held with a family until age three or four and then sent to a brothel. The sale of a newborn can be arranged so the mother signs the child trafficker in as the father, who then takes the baby abroad, making it hard for authorities to trace the child as “officially somewhere in Europe with its father.”
- Emotional attachment to the baby is discussed; one participant reports no emotional attachment, focusing on practicality. The fear of life being over with a child is framed as slavery, constant care, and sleepless nights, highlighting the practical burdens rather than affection.
- On profitability, the mother emphasizes selling a child for organs yields high returns, whereas selling for a brothel is considered in terms of possible cash, with initial offers around 50,000 to 150,000, sometimes 80,000 euros, though later deemed possibly a scam using Polish zloty.
- The liver is cited as a high-demand organ, valued around 70,000 euros, with the heart valued similarly, and other organs like the retina also in demand. The ads and market dynamics are discussed, including portals like “Sperm donors, let's make babies,” where ads from women wanting to give away or sell their children appear; a mother posts an ad for money, receiving responses from families and recognizing banners that target young girls.
- The interview reveals a chilling willingness to commodify the child; the mother states she cares about her own child above the others and expresses disbelief in divine punishment for such acts. She gives the baby the name Marcelina, while another participant has not named the unborn child.
- The trafficking network’s operation is described in detail: a broker coordinates with a German or Dutch ring, with multiple brothels and a system of drugs to control child victims. A child is described as moving through stages—from adoption into a family, to a brothel around age four, to a larger network, with frequent sexual abuse but regulated intervals of activity to avoid overdose. The children are kept largely indoors within brothels, sometimes allowed limited outdoor access under supervision, and often suffer severe social and psychological consequences.
- A separate account details the recruitment and identification of pregnant victims, the length of stay in brothels, and the eventual fate of children who do not adapt to mainstream life, highlighting how the organized rings operate with surgical precision and a global scope.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would it make any difference to you whether your child ended up with a sect, pedophiles, or an organ donor? Or does it matter at all?
Speaker 1: Pedophiles is the worst option, I guess.
Speaker 2: Otherwise Why?
Speaker 1: Because it's evil. Right? Though, as a person who wants to sell their child, I'm in no position to judge. No. I guess it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter after all. Honestly, I just wanna get rid of a problem.
Speaker 0: Someone from the criminal underworld got in touch with me, told me about a girl willing to sell her child to a brothel or as an organ donor. I decided to save that child and make a documentary about it. I began by removing the girl from a criminal environment and finding her a place to stay in a different town. The sale of the child was foiled by the COVID nineteen pandemic and the restrictions on cross border traffic. What happened when you found out you were pregnant?
What were your first thoughts?
Speaker 1: I started looking for a solution. I immediately knew I couldn't have the child, so I was looking to resolve the problem. I believe I made the best decision I could.
Speaker 0: Although I managed to relocate the girl to a different town, she was still controlled by an agent who wanted to sell her child.
Speaker 2: When we already knew she was pregnant, I contacted my colleague, a well known person in the criminal underworld, and simply told him I had a child for sale. I wanted to sell that child for spare parts, to brothel, to pedophiles. I didn't give a fuck where it would go. I just wanted to sell it and make money. So he said he'd help me.
Speaker 0: What do you mean to
Speaker 1: a brothel?
Speaker 0: Such small kids are used in brothels too?
Speaker 2: Of course, it's pretty common in Germany. Meaning? Meaning such small kids are first put up with a family that raises them until they turn three or four, and then they are sent to a brothel.
Speaker 0: The sale of a newborn baby is carried through in such a way that in the hospital the mother signs the child trafficker in as the father. Then he takes the baby abroad. No one will ever look for them, as the baby is officially somewhere in Europe with its father. Do you have any emotional attitude toward
Speaker 1: the baby? No. No.
Speaker 2: I'm trying
Speaker 1: to think practically.
Speaker 0: And when you learnt the baby's gender, did that little person become more real in your head?
Speaker 1: No. No. What do you feel when you look at your belly? Nothing. Disgust.
I don't like it at all. I'd like to get rid of it.
Speaker 0: Why do you think your life would be over if you had the baby?
Speaker 1: Because it's slavery. It's a tie. It's sleepless nights. A baby's not a dog. You can teach to be alone for several hours or so.
It's not like a cat, for example, that you can leave it with a litter box, a bowl of water, some food, and go away for three days.
Speaker 0: Which is more profitable? Selling the child for organs or to a brothel?
Speaker 2: For the mother, selling the child as an organ donor.
Speaker 0: Do you know the final price of the organs? How much a child like that costs in Europe?
Speaker 2: Yes, I do.
Speaker 1: All in all, how much is
Speaker 0: the heart, for example?
Speaker 2: I know the liver costs 70,000 Polish lattes. It's a black market. So it's obvious only wealthy people who have a lot of money are involved. If their child is ill, this is their way to ensure its longer life.
Speaker 1: What's the greatest demand?
Speaker 2: The liver, the heart, the retina, the eyes, the retina.
Speaker 0: Do you know the price of the retina or the heart?
Speaker 2: The heart is worth almost 70,000, but euros.
Speaker 0: What's your approach to selling a child?
Speaker 1: Honestly, if it wasn't for this child who is merchandise, I wouldn't be able to do it. But the thing is, if there's a possibility to earn quite good money on it, why not? They offer 50 to 150,000. It depends.
Speaker 0: Do you believe it's a good price, 50, for a child?
Speaker 1: Without intermediaries, I'd say it's enough.
Speaker 0: Enough for what?
Speaker 1: To make up for those nine months. Where else could a young person like me earn 50,000 in nine months?
Speaker 0: Have you thought what you'd buy with that money? No.
Speaker 1: But if I could afford it, perhaps a nice car?
Speaker 0: Clothes? A phone?
Speaker 1: No shoes?
Speaker 0: Did you get any offers?
Speaker 2: We are offered 80,000.
Speaker 0: Was that offer attractive?
Speaker 2: It seemed so at the beginning. Especially since I knew she'd have to bear that child and then go through a recuperation process. So I knew she'd need money. Therefore, seemed attractive. But later, I did more research and figured out someone was trying
Speaker 1: to con us in a way
Speaker 2: that instead of giving us the price in euros, they did it in Polish zlotyz.
Speaker 0: What's the name of the portal?
Speaker 2: Its name is Sperm donors, let's make babies. It's a website where different people post their ads. Women who want to give away or sell their children. Women seeking co parenting. I posted an ad in which I offered a child for money.
After I'd done that, I received replies from four families, but I also read other posts. I liked two of them because they were looking for girls.
Speaker 0: How did you figure out it was trading?
Speaker 2: Every time a little baby is involved, we know these ads have been posted by people who want to get rid of such a baby. And they don't care where the baby will end up. Our post was among them. All I cared about was that somebody took the child and paid so that I could share the money with the mother.
Speaker 0: So you didn't care much about the children's fate?
Speaker 2: No, I don't really. I care about my own child. My child is most important to me.
Speaker 0: Do you believe in god?
Speaker 2: No. I don't believe in god.
Speaker 0: Do you believe people get punished for doing such things later in life?
Speaker 2: No, I don't. If that was the case, I would have gotten punished long ago. Hundreds of times.
Speaker 0: So as to not think of the unborn baby as an object and to treat it like a human being, I gave it a name. Do you think your baby has feelings? Do you identify yourself with it?
Speaker 1: No. No, I don't. I think it's too small. A baby like that can't understand pain, fear, or happiness. At least that's what I think.
I don't identify myself with it at all. Do you
Speaker 0: know it can hear your voice now?
Speaker 1: Yes, but I'm not giving it a thought.
Speaker 0: And the beating of your heart?
Speaker 1: I'm not thinking about it.
Speaker 0: Why not?
Speaker 1: Why would I? I don't feel a need for that. There's no point in thinking about it. There's no point at all. I'm here and the baby's there.
We are two completely different worlds. At least that's how I see it.
Speaker 0: Did you give your baby a name?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: What name will you give it in hospital then?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Perhaps I'll ask a midwife to come up with something. I have no idea. I'm not thinking about those things yet. Once I got involved in all this,
Speaker 0: I gave the baby a name. What is it? Marcelina.
Speaker 1: Very nice. Let it be Marcelina then.
Speaker 0: I thought I'd like to think and perceive him or her as a human being and not as a dehumanized object, so that I could communicate with it in my head as with a concrete person.
Speaker 2: I believe that giving it a
Speaker 1: name would, in a way, cause you to show interest in the whole process, and how it should look, and some things like preparing a layette for the hospital. I guess it might have a huge impact on my head. Situations. I haven't given it a name. I haven't thought about a name.
I don't do such things. I'm just supposed to bear this child.
Speaker 0: Do you consider a possibility that your emotions might change and you'll regret it?
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 0: I was afraid they might open the borders at any time and the mother would flee abroad to sell the child there. Order to have control over this, I had to get to the trafficker. Do you think it's possible for me to talk to someone from Germany who specializes in child brothels?
Speaker 2: You know what? Or transplants? I guess it is possible, but someone would have to set you up with a person. Even more so, since those child brothels for pedophiles are mainly run by Muslims.
Speaker 0: Why?
Speaker 2: Their religion and culture does not prohibit them from having sex with children. They have wives or husbands who are five or 10 years old, so it's not a problem for them. Therefore, it's the Arabs that mainly run those places.
Speaker 0: How can such an interview be arranged?
Speaker 2: I'd have to ask around.
Speaker 0: Do it then.
Speaker 2: I
Speaker 0: will. For over a month I was trying to get in touch with a trafficker. What did the child trafficker say? Help me understand what I need to do.
Speaker 2: Hold on.
Speaker 0: Go on Skype and then what?
Speaker 2: Yes, go on Skype, enter your login. Your login is an email address that has been set up for the sake of this conversation. What's the address? The address is greyass2020hotmail dot com. Then you need to enter password to your Skype account.
It starts with a capital letter, demoralization, and you're in. Your nickname. Your fake Skype first and last name is Greyzone. He will
Speaker 0: Greyzone has already been set up? Yes. I don't have to do anything?
Speaker 2: Exactly. This is your first and last name. Greyzone. You will receive an invitation from him. You won't see his login?
Only his nick eminence Germany. The guy needs to feel safe. He's also afraid.
Speaker 0: Weeks passed, but the Skype conversation didn't come through. Why does he keep postponing our interview? Is it so hard to set up?
Speaker 2: I received a message. It was on Sunday or Saturday. Was it Friday? I can't remember exactly. On Friday.
Or on Saturday,
Speaker 1: he sent
Speaker 2: me a message that he was very sorry, but he had to go away to pick up some merchandise. I figured he wasn't going to pick up a cardboard of smokes or vodka, but he was going to pick up a child. For him, a living child, a living human being is merchandise. He doesn't even call a child a child, he calls it merchandise because that's what it is for him. It's an object that can be monetized.
He'd sell his own mother for organs if she wasn't so old. No one wants her organs anymore.
Speaker 0: Does he have his own child?
Speaker 2: Yes, a son.
Speaker 0: Do you think he has any human feelings for him?
Speaker 2: No, because, for what I know, his son cooperates with him. So it's more of a business partnership rather than a father son relationship.
Speaker 0: So his son kidnaps children too?
Speaker 2: He delivers them. Despite the fact the whole thing takes place in Germany or in The Netherlands. There are organized rings here that work nonstop, like ants, to track those women. To get to know their daily routines and habits, to see what they do, where their children are, where they
Speaker 1: leave them.
Speaker 2: Therefore, I believe this practice is meticulously planned and carried through.
Speaker 0: It's a
Speaker 2: whole It's a whole process.
Speaker 0: It's a whole team of people that look for those women, right? Of course, it
Speaker 2: is. When I talked to him, he told me he comes to Poland, for example, and very often looks with the girls himself, Allegedly. Where? In parks, stores, restaurants, cafes. Allegedly, after so many years in the business, she has an 80% chance to successfully identify a pregnant girl who'd at least be willing to talk to him.
Speaker 0: He identifies them like police officers or taught to identify criminals. Yes. As they walk the streets to identify thugs, so does he find his victim?
Speaker 2: To find the right girl. He told me it depends on a number of factors, clothes, behavior, or appearance. There, when he's already talking to the girl, he told me that pretty soon, over a cup of tea or something, he's able to tell whether he's wasted his time or could take it a step further.
Speaker 0: How much do those girls charge for this?
Speaker 2: About 2 or €3,000 €5,000 if they are resistant. But It often happens. They get no money at all.
Speaker 0: You mean they're conned, or are they so keen to get rid of the problem?
Speaker 2: No. They are conned. It does happen.
Speaker 1: They are told they'll get paid in arrears, so they
Speaker 0: give their child away and are left with nothing?
Speaker 2: Yes. Or they get €100 to keep them smiling. Just to have them get a glimpse of cash.
Speaker 0: So he doesn't even have to bother to kidnap the children, as it would be a serious thing, including the police hunt and everything? Yes?
Speaker 2: No, he doesn't, but if there is demand, as he puts it, if there is demand for a particular commodity, it is sometimes a matter of hours. Then the whole machine he's involved with focuses on delivering a specific child at a specific age, so they have to kidnap it.
Speaker 0: How many brothels do they have? Four. How many children are in each of them?
Speaker 2: Last time I asked, there were seven of them in one of the German brothels.
Speaker 0: Do those children live there?
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 0: Do they even leave the brothel? No. So they never go out for a walk, right?
Speaker 2: They do go outside with a chaperone that watches them, but they never go beyond the wall or the fence.
Speaker 0: So it happens inside a house, right?
Speaker 2: Yes, in a house. A regular house.
Speaker 0: So a child ends up there at the age of about four?
Speaker 2: Yes, about four.
Speaker 0: Why four?
Speaker 2: It depends on what the clients want.
Speaker 0: And then the child is stuffed with drugs?
Speaker 2: Yes, they're stuffed with drugs. Cocaine or amphetamine. But the child usually has intercourse with a pedophile about once a week only. That's why there are so many of them. To stay in business.
There must be a lot of children.
Speaker 0: Why only once a week?
Speaker 2: A child can't be kept on cocaine or amphetamine all the time, because it might kill them.
Speaker 0: So they're given drugs only during an intercourse?
Speaker 2: Before an intercourse, whenever the need arises. It's such a hermetic world that they know even several days earlier when and which pedophile will come and ask for a child.
Speaker 0: Until what age does a child remain in a brothel?
Speaker 2: Until the age of 12 or 13?
Speaker 0: Then what?
Speaker 2: They are sent to a regular brothel. Because such a child is no longer able to change their life. Their mind is so fucked up and so is their world that the only thing they can do is go to an adult brothel.
Speaker 0: And how long do they stay there?
Speaker 2: As long as they can. If they're good at what they do.
Speaker 0: Can they go out, or do they remain locked up?
Speaker 2: They may go out, just like in the brothels in Poland, but a child like that generally becomes a social misfit. They suffer from social phobias, they have never gone to school. They are taught on the spot what to say or how to sign their name at the most.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 2/7🧵 “The kids clients are very rich. They even come in their own private jets & helicopters from f*ck knows where. They are picked up at different locations. Filthy rich. They pay a fortune to spend time with a CHILD. Everything’s arranged with a medical team. They know the child will not survive.. and if it becomes crippled for life, nobodies going to look after it so it automatically becomes an organ donor. Post 3 👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on a trafficking operation involving sexual exploitation of very young children, with several details about how the system works, who’s involved, and what happens to the victims.
- Meeting and control: The trafficker had been contacting the speaker by phone that night to arrange in-person dialogue, with intermediaries making intentions unclear. The trafficker repeatedly changed the meeting time, and final directions were given about 30 minutes before the interview. The speakers emphasize the danger and precarity of contact through intermediaries.
- Terminology and targets: The trafficker uses specific terms: “merchandise” for boys and “dolly” for girls. A 10-year-old boy is considered too old for certain purposes; a three- or four-year-old child is described as preferred for sexual activities, with graphic details about age and activities.
- Routine and condition of the children: The sexual abuse is described as a long, sustained event, sometimes lasting many hours, with no regular breaks solely due to clients. If one child tires, another is used. Children are given nourishment, vitamins, and sometimes IV drips or injections to keep them functioning and appearing healthy. The day-to-day abuse is described as a form of “breeding” and “recycling,” with children being kept alive for ongoing use until they are no longer deemed useful.
- Medical and protective care: Women who look after the children are described as “aunties,” with some cruel behavior (e.g., pulling hair). Some care is provided to keep the children functional, though the environment is described as perverse and coercive, with children initially unresponsive even to their own names.
- Locations and scale: The speaker knows of about four brothels in Europe, located in Belgium, Germany, and Poland, including one in Tri City, Poland, described as a regular house. The sexual activity occurs before organs are removed, implying preparation for transplantation.
- Financials and exploitation: The price for the full set of services is described as around half a million euros, with the understanding that the child becomes “useless” after that. Younger children (including four-year-olds) are kept for ongoing exploitation, while older children (six or eight and up) are used for regular sex before disposal.
- Disposal and the dark net: After children reach about 14, they are disposed of or sent elsewhere; in some cases, they are photographed or filmed for sharing on the dark net. There are mentions of “VIP entertainment” and extreme sexual violence, including suffocation as a common fantasy and other brutal acts.
- Perpetrators and beliefs: The traffickers are described as part of a sect with satanic elements, greeting each other with two specific words and possessing a pentagram, sometimes found under inscriptions. They are depicted as controlling and predatory, with some perpetrators showing a chilling level of premeditation and ritualism.
- Real-life case: A mother is pressured over eighteen months to dispose of her child for cash, ultimately selling a four- or five-year-old for about €10,000, believing the child would be adopted abroad, but it was diverted for spare parts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After many weeks, the agent told me the trafficker would contact me by phone that night. I'm really glad you finally called me and we can talk directly, because with intermediaries, intentions are never fully clear, and so on.
Speaker 1: I'd rather meet in person.
Speaker 0: That'd be great. Just tell me when we could do it. Do you have any idea? Do you have any plans? Or is it still up in the air?
Speaker 1: I have to stay here for a few days. I have some business to attend to.
Speaker 0: The trafficker broke off contact with me, and it seemed we'd never get to meet. No, nothing. What do you think might have happened?
Speaker 1: And I was afraid it was some sort of setup. Do you know how many Polish children have no graves? So fucking many.
Speaker 0: The trafficker would change the time of our meeting several times. Finally, thirty minutes before the interview, he told me where to go. What kind of words do those guys use? Do they say merchandise and stuff? How does it work?
That's the way.
Speaker 1: That's the way. What's the term? A dolly, usually.
Speaker 0: Does the gender matter? Or are boys called that too?
Speaker 1: It matters. Merchandise is usually used for the boys, and dolly for the girls. For him, a 10 year old boy is too old. A very little child, a three or four years old boy, or a three or four years old girl likes to touch and lick a little weenie. And the intercourse is between the thighs and the buns.
Speaker 0: What does the child's day look like? How many times a day or a week do they have sex?
Speaker 1: It depends. You can't have a child for an hour. It's a whole day or a whole night event. At least for several hours.
Speaker 0: Does it go on day after day? Or are there any breaks because of the drugs they're given?
Speaker 1: No, no, no.
Speaker 0: Or does it basically depend on the number of clients?
Speaker 1: If one child is exhaustive, there is another one.
Speaker 0: While the first one is recuperating, right?
Speaker 1: Yes, the child must eat something. They are also given some vitamins, something nutritious.
Speaker 0: Are they drip fed? Yes. Do they get vaginal abrasions or something?
Speaker 1: They get some medical care. Someone takes care of them, so they function and look well. So
Speaker 0: it's kind of breeding, human breeding?
Speaker 1: Yes, exactly. Sometimes the children refuse to eat, Then they get injections.
Speaker 0: It's something like a PTSD?
Speaker 1: Kind of.
Speaker 0: Are they injected with nutrients or drugs?
Speaker 1: There may be drips or it may be injections. The women that look after them are kind of good aunties, Though some of them are not that good, as one of them pulls their hair until they do what she wants or respond when she calls out their names, because at the beginning, they don't respond to anything, Not even their names. As if the kids completely turned off.
Speaker 0: How many of those brothels do you think there are in Europe?
Speaker 1: I know of about four. In which countries? Belgium, Germany, Poland.
Speaker 0: Where is the one in Poland?
Speaker 1: Tri City.
Speaker 0: In a regular house as well? Yes.
Speaker 1: Those intercourses take place before a child is taken away for organs.
Speaker 0: Does the client have to pay more for that?
Speaker 1: Of course. I believe the price amounts to I mean, really, the whole team is engaged. So it must be around half €1,000,000. And he's aware the child becomes useless after that.
Speaker 0: Do those four year olds live together with seven eight year olds, or do they go somewhere else?
Speaker 1: No. Seven or eight years old are good for regular sex. And those little kids are separated.
Speaker 0: From what age can you have an intercourse with a child without risking tearing them apart?
Speaker 1: Well, I'd say They can have regular sex from the age six or eight, and early. That is when recycling begins. Recycling? Yes, at a VIP price. VIP entertainment.
He likes it when he shows his dick in. Blood spilling. He massacres the child.
Speaker 0: Does he murder the child or leave it to die?
Speaker 1: Whatever turns him on. But then, the child is a wreck anyway.
Speaker 0: How long can a child survive in such conditions?
Speaker 1: If there's a client, for the VIP satisfaction, then they won't survive. Children who are six or over will pull through.
Speaker 0: How long do they stay in a brothel?
Speaker 1: Those kids are hooked on drugs, so I'm not sure. Until they turn 14. What then? They get disposed of.
Speaker 0: Disposed of, or sent to another brothel? Disposed of.
Speaker 1: They're usually disposed of because they're no longer eligible for transplants.
Speaker 0: Due to drug related body exhaustion?
Speaker 1: Yes. When the child is no longer attractive, when it's useless and can't be used for spare parts any longer, they make movies and post them on the dark net.
Speaker 0: What exactly have you seen?
Speaker 1: Suffocation during sex is a standard thing. That is a common fantasy. To be doing it to the very end.
Speaker 0: What about nonstandard things? A nonstandard thing
Speaker 1: is to simply fuck everything up with your dick.
Speaker 0: In order to get to the truth, I spent several dozen hours talking to him.
Speaker 1: A kid that already has some understanding of what's going on around them because, to some extent, a 12 year old is aware of certain things, is fed such a vision of life or death, actually, that, in a way, his reality becomes totally messed up. As there are perversions where they get turned on by pushing sex to the insane limits so that the kid takes their own life during an intercourse. How? For example, some kids slash their wrists or beg to be choked to death. They grab their hands and put them on their neck and squeeze them by themselves.
That's what turns them on.
Speaker 0: Do they have any sophisticated toys, or are there no toys? You
Speaker 1: know, I guess all of them have their favorite fluffy toys, some have their favorite pillows, the kids often fight over their fluffy toys. Kids don't hug each other, they're afraid of being touched. They are. They seem to know. They're even afraid to touch their own bodies.
I don't know any more cold blooded woman than those from that brothel.
Speaker 0: The ones that take part
Speaker 1: in this? Yes. The ones that allegedly look after the kids.
Speaker 0: Are they ordinary women? Do they have children, husbands, their own homes? Or are they young individuals?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: No. More mature?
Speaker 1: They're also European, and at least two of those that I have personally seen have brought their own children there. I'll send you a picture. I looked pretty worn out because I'd been traveling. There are two girls there sitting on my lap. Those kids took to me so much, and I love children dearly.
When I entered, they got pretty scared of me. Somehow, they caught my attention, and my eyes smiled at them. My eyes, not my face. You just kept putting in words. One grabbed my leg, the other grabbed my other leg.
I sat on the bed. How old were they? Roughly? About 10. They started singing songs for me, both of them, and both were jealous of each other.
Speaker 0: How did they manifest their jealousy?
Speaker 1: They just wanted to be saved. Something I couldn't do.
Speaker 0: When talking to the trafficker, I knew I was looking at the devil in the eye. Do those people believe in Satan? How do they worship him? Are they deep in that oculate shit?
Speaker 1: It's a sect. Those people don't even greet each other when they greet each other. I mean, they don't greet each other by just saying hello or good morning or Guten Tag or whatever normal people say when they greet each other. That's not what they say.
Speaker 0: So what do they say? Are they fucking Satan or
Speaker 1: what? No. No. They use completely different two words. What words?
I'm not going to utter them.
Speaker 0: Why?
Speaker 1: I promised myself I'd never say them.
Speaker 0: What if I turn the camera off?
Speaker 1: Turn the camera off and I'll tell you.
Speaker 0: Have you ever seen any Satanist artifacts when you went to visit those individuals? Any oculate objects, like pentagrams and birded crosses or something?
Speaker 1: There is a pentagram under that inscription. Really? I was fucking there, man.
Speaker 0: The dude has a pentagram in his house?
Speaker 1: Yes. There are those words I told you they use to greet each other. That kind of our good morning. And there's a pentagram under them.
Speaker 0: There is the evil one behind the children's suffering. It's obvious.
Speaker 1: Working on a girl, it's not a quick and easy process. It doesn't take a day or a week. From my experience, I can tell you it took us eighteen months to work on a mother. She didn't know about it. But there was always someone watching her, whether she was taking good care of her child, whether everything was okay.
At the same time, we pressed her relentlessly to abandon that bastard.
Speaker 0: Did she sell her child to a brothel?
Speaker 1: She didn't fucking care. She took the dough, and that
Speaker 0: was it. How much did she get?
Speaker 1: She got around €10,000 in cash.
Speaker 0: How old was the child?
Speaker 1: Four or five?
Speaker 0: And she sold the kid? Yes.
Speaker 1: She was happy everyone had left her fucking alone, including the kid. She thought the kid was up for adoption by a good family abroad.
Speaker 0: Where did it go?
Speaker 1: The kid was ugly. It wasn't very beautiful. And generally, treated it in such a way that even I got to detest the kid as a result. But they gladly accepted it. She thought the kid was adopted, but in fact, it went for spare parts.
Whatever comes to light
Speaker 0: becomes known.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 3/7🧵 “It’s all professionally set up. Like a corporation? Yes, like a corporation. As complex as a corporation. There must be a medical team on standby. Someone must look after those kids. Someone must organize.. the transplants.. and everything. There must also be someone that helps them search clients for the organs out.” “It will continue. The demand is HUGE and it won’t change” Post 4👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript depicts an undercover-style interview with individuals involved in a global child trafficking and organ harvesting operation. The speakers discuss how the network operates, the profits, and the brutal methods used to procure children and organs, often exploiting vulnerable mothers.
Key points:
- Donor kit and adoption timing: The trafficker (Speaker 1) explains the cost structure and process, saying he “gets €15,000 for abroad with a kid” and that delivering a child takes about two weeks if there are no special requests for gender. The plan requires several meetings, a party, and testing of the girl, with multiple people involved to ensure the girl’s compliance.
- Recruitment and manipulation: The group uses persuasion and “positive thinking” techniques, aiming to see the girl’s reaction and exploiting mothers who are vulnerable or indebted. If a girl has a child, she is pressured or reassured before being persuaded to hand the child over.
- Transfer options and appetite for either a child or organs: Depending on demand, the organization may pull a child from a brothel to satisfy clients seeking a child or spare parts. They advertise themselves as a sponsor or businessman abroad, receiving many replies from girls who think they are applying for companionship or work.
- Targeted profiles and grooming: An “ideal” girl is described as selfish and easily pliable, with tactics including bribing experiences (a trip to Mazari), monitoring reactions to a child’s calls, and testing loyalty in ways that reveal vulnerability to manipulation.
- After acquisition: If a girl agrees, discussions cover the child’s fate, with the implication that the child may be taken away and replaced with forged documents later. There is mention of marriages to Arab men and Muslim legal processes to adopt the child and move it abroad, often with easy, illegitimate name changes that erase traces.
- Documentation and traceability: The process often involves swapping papers or creating new identities for the child in Poland or abroad, so that traceability is lost. This includes using new papers for Ukrainian-made children, or other methods to render the child effectively invisible to authorities.
- Kidnapping and urgent transplants: Kidnapping is described as rare but possible in emergencies when a transplant is urgently needed. The organization uses coordinated efforts to manage the client’s access while avoiding exposure.
- Violent and dehumanizing practices: The dialogue describes infants being tortured and dismembered for organs in a sterile room at a villa, with phrases indicating that infants “suffer” and are used as “spare parts.” Older children are drugged and exploited over time; infants are deemed “useless” for long-term exploitation.
- Global network and sophistication: The brokers, medical teams, and logistics are likened to a corporation, with branches worldwide, high-security operations, and organized procurement of both children and organs. The demand is described as immense and ongoing.
- Emotional detachment: One speaker notes the mother’s collapse into depression and a desire to kill herself and the baby; another reflects a chilling detachment about the mother’s suffering and the ultimate objective of profit.
The dialogue reveals a highly organized, international criminal market for exploiting women and children, with both adoption fraud and organ trafficking tightly interwoven, including identity manipulation, forced payments, and extreme violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted the devil to reveal himself and show his true face. How much would I have to pay for a donor kit if I wanted to buy one from you?
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I just get my cut. I can't really tell.
Speaker 0: How much do you get?
Speaker 1: I get €15,000 for abroad with a kid.
Speaker 0: For carrying through the whole process of adoption? Yes. So if I ordered a child from you, how long would I have to wait?
Speaker 1: Do you have any special requests? A boy? A girl?
Speaker 0: Let's say I do, or don't. It'll be faster if I don't.
Speaker 1: So just a child, right? Yes. Two weeks. Contrary to what you might think, it's hard work, so I don't get a hard on when I think about those girls. I'm not in a hurry, but I do get pressed.
Every day, in the morning, I try to go by the book and use the power of positive thinking. Then I can see the nose and the eyes of a cute little doe before my face. Those little pets look so sweet.
Speaker 0: How long does it usually take to bring a girl around?
Speaker 1: Bring a girl around?
Speaker 0: I mean, from the moment you meet her to when she decides to hand the child over.
Speaker 1: Two or three meetings?
Speaker 0: Unbelievable. How long are those meetings?
Speaker 1: There's a party. I take her to a party, and I'll work on her then. I test her, but not only me. There are several of us. We help each other.
I get help. We support each other. And do the job. There's a reason why we're there. The girl decides not to fuck me on the first date.
I don't give a fuck about fucking her.
Speaker 0: Okay. So what are the options from there? Brothel or spare parts? It
Speaker 1: depends. If there's demand, they will even pull a child out of the brothel.
Speaker 0: From the brothel for spare parts? Yes. So the parts are a priority?
Speaker 1: Yes, absolutely. They bring in huge money quickly. I post an ad that I'm a businessman working abroad. I visit Poland once a month, and I need company. I want to be a sponsor, and girls reply.
There are lots of replies. You test them. It depends on what you're after, whether you're after the organs or a child, what her living conditions are, and so on. Then you go and hunt the girl down. It sometimes happens those children are handicapped in some way.
So you start working on that. Those girls are not particularly educated nor intelligent. The child stands in their way. Taking the child away from them is not a problem.
Speaker 0: So what qualities should an ideal child dealing girl possess?
Speaker 1: First of all, she must be selfish. You can see right away, she's ready to kiss your ass and do anything you want. Since it's all about children, you begin by asking: Do you have any children? Yes? What age?
Let's say she's got a six year old girl, And you immediately offer a trip to, let's say, Mazari to sail in a boat there. She's on Cloud 9. You take her there for two or three days, watch her whether she calls the child or her mother. Usually, it's her mother that stays with the child and keeps calling. Mhmm.
And when she answers her mother's calls, you hear what she says and how she says things, and whether she's pissed off. Then her mother calls again, and she's yours. You pretend you're having fun. We talk. I tell her she's got a cute daughter.
Of course, I am proud of her. I took after her. It turns out she has children, and that's when he cuts in. Children, what the fuck do you need children for? Why would you take that on your shoulders?
We kind of talk like a friend to a friend. And, of course, we watch your reaction. If there is anything we can do at all, we work on her.
Speaker 0: Let's say she agrees.
Speaker 1: Yes, it sometimes happens, the girl tells you. You know, that fucking kid? It's just fucking trouble. And I don't know what to do with this shit and so on.
Speaker 0: Do you think it'll be over once you bear the child?
Speaker 2: Yes. I think it'll be all over once I have that child. Once it gets out of my body for good, it'll go to its world while I remain in mine. I'm not going to see it ever again. I won't feel it.
I won't hear it. Many people won't understand it, but most of them have never been in such a situation. Carrying a child you don't want is so devastating to your mind that it's hard to imagine.
Speaker 0: Despite what the women were planning to do after the child was born, the agent brought a lay it for Marcelina.
Speaker 2: Pads for you. Give me my stuff. I don't care about the child. These pants don't be fucking breathless. They're awesome.
This is a puppy's paw. Do you know why it's here? Because underneath it says I love my mom.
Speaker 0: Why have you covered it?
Speaker 2: Because the child won't have a mom. But I've not covered I love my dad.
Speaker 0: We needed a midwife to help with the delivery. I set up a consultation which, due to the COVID-nineteen, had to be done online.
Speaker 2: Have you been pregnant before? No. Whom are you carrying? A girl. What is her name?
Marcycia? Marcelina.
Speaker 0: I hope that conversation would stir some emotions in You'll the
Speaker 2: have contractions every five minutes. You'll watch them for an hour to see if they're getting stronger. The next hour Once again, please. You got distracted. I got distracted.
I'm basically trying to give you a patchwork of specific information. It's difficult. I'm not getting attached. It's not difficult. I don't care whether it's difficult or not.
I just don't form any sort of attachment. I just wanna learn some basic stuff and go and bear that child and end my adventure with it. I don't want to elaborate on that. I'm not even asking you to.
Speaker 0: I approached my interview with the trafficker as if it was a police interrogation, where you often go back to the same issues in order to establish the truth. I
Speaker 1: found about 500 such girls on the Internet. If a mother goes abroad to give her child up for adoption, the mother ends up in a brothel, and she gets hooked on drugs. And so does the child. A child is a kind of merchandise that brings pure profit as it requires no investments and earns its living by working in a brothel. And when there's a bed for an organ, it goes on an operating table for disassembly.
The mother also goes for spare parts.
Speaker 0: Were you afraid of meeting such a person?
Speaker 1: No. How come?
Speaker 2: I believe a person should be approached in a holistic manner. There's a task to be done. Since he's a professional, I also try to be professional without asking unnecessary questions. Brief statements, short questions, whatever I need to know, whatever's essential.
Speaker 0: Did he make a good impression on you?
Speaker 2: He won me over with his approach and composure.
Speaker 1: The Egyptian Those girls think they'll return to Poland with a lot of money. They think they'll get rich but are unaware they're on their way to a brothel. I don't know what'll happen to them or that they'll get hooked on drugs or lose their freedom. And you know what I felt while recruiting those girls? I didn't give a shit about those girls and their kids.
All I cared about was the money. The adoption of a child is carried through in such a way that the girl gets married to an Arab, a Muslim. The Muslim law allows marrying even underage girls. Then he gets to adopt the child. He takes the child away to his country, a Muslim one, in a legit way.
In Muslim countries, papers are easy to get. For 50 local dollars, you can get any document you want. Changing the first or last name is not a problem, and so any trace of the child is lost. What then? They go to Egypt for a couple of days.
They get new papers through some formal correction of the name and the last name in a matter of hours. And the child returns as a completely different person. Returns to Europe, to the brothel, and no one is ever looking for that child again. The trace is lost. A child had left.
It had a name and a last name, and a different person came back to Europe later.
Speaker 0: And the mother?
Speaker 1: She goes to a brothel in Europe.
Speaker 0: What does it look like when they bring you kids for sale from Ukraine?
Speaker 1: When a child comes from Ukraine, it gets new papers here in Poland. These are another child's papers with an identical ID. Only the photo of the imported kid is swapped, and practically the trace is lost here. The child goes abroad with its new Polish ID. So
Speaker 0: you need the ID in case of inspection?
Speaker 1: Yes, while crossing the border. Just in case.
Speaker 0: Then there are no more problems, because the real child stays in Poland, while the other one is officially nonexistent.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And what happens with kidnapped children?
Speaker 1: Children are kidnapped only in urgent cases. If there's an emergency, someone got ill, there's a problem, and an urgent transplant is needed, that's when kidnapping takes place.
Speaker 0: Why is kidnapping so rare?
Speaker 1: Because it's dangerous. Dangerous for the organization. It doesn't pay to keep a kidnapped child in a brothel. Because things may happen, and there may be trouble. It would be a total disaster if such a kid was found.
Speaker 0: What's the difference whether they find a kidnapped or a regular child in a brothel? Because you may pretend it's not really a brothel?
Speaker 1: No one is going to admit it's a brothel. But there's a difference. Because if the child is being searched for by Interpol, it's a serious shit. But you can always account for a regular child. Whether the child has been adopted and went through the adoption process with an Arab father or in any other way, rather than admitting the child's been sold or kidnapped.
The client doesn't have to come to the brothel in his own car. He is brought there. The meeting spot is established earlier. It's different with different clients. Even the clients can't see each other.
It happens that they even tear infants apart with their dicks. The baby dies.
Speaker 0: In that room? Yes?
Speaker 1: Yes, in that room. The moment the client informs he wants to kill the child, a whole group is immediately set up to pick up the organs. We schedule it so that everything overlaps, so that we have a recipient ready. Whatever can be saved.
Speaker 0: Is the child still alive when it's being taken to the Operating Room? It's done on the spot
Speaker 1: in the villa.
Speaker 0: Is that where the organs are retrieved?
Speaker 1: Yes. There's a special sterile room there. When they torture those children, the children get broken. Their arms get broken, their legs, their legs get pulled out of the hips. They often get beaten up, Torn apart.
Organs. Buttholes.
Speaker 0: Do you mean those little babies get their legs pulled out? Yes.
Speaker 1: So it's sadism. Yes, sadism. Infants always suffer. They all do. Later that child is useless.
Speaker 0: Do you ever think you might get punished for that at some point of your life?
Speaker 2: No. I never do. I believe if you do not think about such things, they never happen.
Speaker 1: Older children are exploited for a while. They're addicted to the drugs they're sedated with. But infants become useless. They go for spare parts. Older kids can't take it mentally.
Also because of the drugs, they ration them out to make the costs as low as possible. Because the kids are nothing more than just merchandise. That also has an impact on their mental state. One boy slashed his wrists. He couldn't take it.
All that manhandling and the kind of life he had there. They did save him, of course. But he was sent for spare parts. The drugs put children in such extreme psychotic state. That they hurt themselves.
The kids' clients are very rich. They even come in their own private jets and helicopters from fuck who knows where. They are picked up at different locations, filthy rich. They pay a fortune to spend time with a child. Everything's arranged with a medical team.
They know the child will not survive. And if it becomes crippled for life, nobody's going to look after it. So it immediately becomes an organ donor. Those brothels have branches all over the world, with operating rooms. There are high security sites.
Few people know about them. There are no regular brothels. We're talking about huge money here, so they are perfectly organized. It's not just some dude or madam sitting there. It's all professionally set up.
Speaker 0: Like a corporation?
Speaker 1: Yes. Like a corporation. As complex as a corporation. There must be a medical team on standby. Someone must look after those kids.
Someone must organize. The transplants and everything. There must also be someone that helps search clients for the organs out. It will continue. The demand is huge and It won't change.
Speaker 0: To stop me from saving the child, the devil struck at the mother. The darkness that the mother colluded with turned against her and pushed her into depression. At some point, the mother told us she wanted to kill herself and the baby.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 4/7🧵 Jeffery Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell & Epstein Island, P Diddy, Hollywood, is just the beginning. Child trafficking, child organ trafficking, human trafficking goes all the way to the top… and it’s everywhere. Ukraine 🇺🇦 and Israel 🇮🇱 are some of the epicenters for this type of evil. Post 5👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript follows a pregnant woman’s intense emotional crisis and complicated pregnancy, interspersed with a separate account from a mother about a missing child.
- The pregnant woman, identified as Speaker 0, contemplates the due date and the prospect of abortion. She fears November 9 might force a stressful decision, and she tells Speaker 1 that she cannot promise she won’t hurt herself, expressing suicidal thoughts and describing that suicide would bring her peace of mind. She cannot predict how she would behave if told her baby is due sooner or later, and she repeatedly says she would like to get rid of the baby, seeing the child as giving her nothing and feeling disconnected from it.
- Speaker 2 mentions the need for a good ultrasound (USG) test result to clarify the due date, suggesting possibilities like the twentieth, twenty-seventh, November third, or November 5. The hope is that a clear result will ease the situation.
- The conversation reveals escalating suicidal thoughts, including contemplation of specific methods and a “suicide package” offered by a friend ofSpeaker 0 who knows how to obtain substances. The package costs 380 zilates. The assistant asks if she will kill herself and the child because she cannot wait twelve days, prompting Speaker 0 to reaffirm the urgent need for the ultrasound result and the associated stress.
- Speaker 0 describes the pregnancy as producing neither joy nor maternal connection; she explicitly states she does not identify with the fetus, does not talk to it, and does not want it. She describes daily life as painful and says she would like to end the pregnancy. She distinguishes between the baby’s reality and her own mental state, reporting that the baby’s presence has provided nothing to her emotionally.
- Marcelina’s birth becomes a turning point. The baby is born by C-section after a hospital stay, with the baby described as a girl weighing about three kilograms and healthy, scoring 10 points on assessment. The mother reports that the baby’s test results were good, and that her mental state is improving, though she remains stressed about the surgery itself. She had not seen the baby during delivery due to the hospital setup and the emotional intensity, and she shares that the atmosphere was tense and nerve-wracking.
- Post-delivery, Speaker 0 describes being in significant pain and on medications, including hydroxyzine, and recalls distress from the prior night. While she dreams of the baby, she feels emotionally detached and uncertain about whether she can handle contacting the child in the recovery room. She expresses a desire to leave the hospital soon to avoid further distress and contemplates whether she would want to have more children in the future, acknowledging a sense of underdeveloped maternal instinct.
- The narrative then shifts to a separate account (Speaker 2) of a missing child, Tomok, told by a mother who describes the day her child was abducted, her ongoing search, and her determination. She recounts searching outdoors, praying for punishment to be directed at herself rather than her child, and vows to fend for her child, insisting that a child is a living being and not a consumable object. Thirty years later, she remains convinced her son is alive.
- The overall arc combines pregnancy distress, considerations of abortion and self-harm, a difficult but ultimately successful birth, and a parallel testimony of enduring desperation and perseverance in the face of a long-term missing-child tragedy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if they say November 9?
Speaker 1: Then you'll know it's going to happen. What's the problem? I guess November ninth may sound stressful to you, and you'd want to get rid of the baby sooner. I
Speaker 0: can't promise that I won't hurt myself, it's starting to mess my head up.
Speaker 1: Are you having suicidal thoughts?
Speaker 0: Yes, I do.
Speaker 1: Where did they come from?
Speaker 0: From all this.
Speaker 1: How could suicide help?
Speaker 0: It'd give me peace of mind.
Speaker 1: Do you think killing yourself would rid you of the problem?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Do you know what impact it'll have on you if the USG guy tells you're due sooner?
Speaker 0: But it may be delayed too. Right? And I can't predict. I'm not able to how I'll behave in such a situation. I just can't.
Speaker 2: We need a good USG test result.
Speaker 0: Once she
Speaker 2: has it, perhaps it'll show that she's due on, say, the twentieth or the twenty seventh or even the ninth, November, or the
Speaker 0: November 5.
Speaker 2: Once she has the results in her hand, it may be easier for her.
Speaker 1: Are the suicidal thoughts getting worse?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Have you already pictured in your mind how you're going to do it?
Speaker 0: I have a friend who's acquainted with those things. He wouldn't say what kind of substance it is, but I know it's effective. He prepares specific med cocktails, and for the right price, he provides you with a package.
Speaker 1: A suicide package?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: How do you find him?
Speaker 0: Through a friend who had problems before and wanted to commit suicide. She used his services and she's no longer here.
Speaker 1: How much is such a suicide package?
Speaker 0: 380 zilates.
Speaker 1: Are you going to kill yourself and the child just because you can't wait twelve days?
Speaker 0: That's why I need that paper. I need the c section because I can't promise I won't hurt myself.
Speaker 1: Doesn't it thinking about her help? Doesn't she give you any motivation or relief?
Speaker 0: This child gives me nothing. Absolutely nothing at all. I want to get rid of it. I'm not identifying myself with it. I'm not thinking about it.
I'm not looking at it. I'm not talking to it. I don't pay attention to it. Moving, I just don't think about it. I don't want it.
I just don't want it. For me, every day when I get up in the morning and look at myself, at my belly and stuff, it is just another day filled with pain.
Speaker 1: I wanted to be at Marcelina's birth, but it turned out the mother couldn't wait until her due date. Fearing for the child's life, the only solution was a day to day c section.
Speaker 0: It's my bed. The bed of a lady I share a room with. I've already signed all the papers. Some kind of anamnesis for the anesthesiologist. I've had dinner.
I got my supper. Typical hospital food, not too tasty. You can't have everything. I'm not alone in the room. There's another lady, but she tried to talk to me about the baby, about my situation.
Is it a boy or a girl? The lady's having her second child. I don't know if it's a boy or a girl. Anyway, she tried to have a conversation with me. I told her the truth about my situation, and she never spoke to me again.
As for the baby's test results, they were good. Almost three kilos of a girl. And my mental state is getting better. I feel more relieved, but I'm getting stressed about the very surgery.
Speaker 1: Sounds okay, Kim.
Speaker 0: Five forty. I don't really know what it means. After CTG, I'm supposed to get washed and put on a shirt for the c section. And come see the midwives. I'm pretty stressed out, but only about the surgery rather than all this.
I have no thoughts about the child.
Speaker 1: Do you have any doubts?
Speaker 0: I don't think so. No, I don't have any. I don't because I have no doubts for now. I'm not sure about tomorrow though, but common sense will prevail over them anyway.
Speaker 1: Have you thought whether you'll ever have children again?
Speaker 0: Generally, yes, but for now, after reaching this point and considering what's going on, I don't think I wanna have a child at all. I'm horrified to see how underdeveloped my maternal instinct is.
Speaker 1: Marcelino was born at 12PM. Healthy. She scored 10 points and weighed three kilograms.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let me get up slowly.
Speaker 1: How are you feeling?
Speaker 0: I'm good. It hurts, but I guess it's normal.
Speaker 1: Have you seen the baby, or haven't you?
Speaker 0: No. I had a screen in front of my face. There was a screen. But, generally, it was so nerve racking for me that I can't even describe it.
Speaker 1: Nerve racking in what sense? Because of the childbirth or because of the surgery?
Speaker 0: I don't know. Everyone in the whole atmosphere were kind of kind of grave a bit. It took forty minutes. It was horrible at the beginning because I couldn't breathe and my heart was rushing. Then it got so serene.
I I almost drifted away. I didn't feel anything. I didn't know you feel nothing at all. First, I could feel some jerking in my stomach and after that, you know, basically nothing at all.
Speaker 1: How do you feel about getting rid of the baby? Do you feel relieved after the baby's been removed from your body?
Speaker 0: Yes. I feel greatly relieved. The C section was yesterday. Today, I feel way better. Last night was a disaster.
I couldn't sleep. I was being fed meds through a drip and some oral pills plus hydroxyzine because I couldn't sleep due to the pain. Do I think about my kid? I did dream about her, but I can't I'm still too dopey to wrap my head around it. And I don't really miss her, but I would like to see her, but I know it did do no good.
Speaker 1: We need to see that child.
Speaker 0: I'm not sure I can take it, I mean, maybe in the evening, but I I can't promise it won't mess up my head.
Speaker 1: Okay. You'll see how you'll feel.
Speaker 0: Later, when I'm able to go there myself, do what I've got to do, film her, take some pictures, and leave, I think I'll be good. But to lie with her in the patient recovery room?
Speaker 1: I get it. But could you spare her ten minutes? Couldn't you?
Speaker 0: What am I supposed to do with her for ten minutes?
Speaker 1: I asked the mother to show me the baby, as I wanted to see Marcelina at least once. The mother wanted no contact with the baby whatsoever. She told me the worst moment came when Marcelina suddenly sneezed and looked her in the eye.
Speaker 0: I don't know how she's doing. I just wanna get out of the hospital as soon as possible to cut myself off. I'm alone in the room. I mainly sleep and watch TV. I walk around a little, nothing special.
So I'm sitting here Thinking, that does me no good. I'm I must occupy myself with something.
Speaker 1: I asked myself if the police were able to save that child and give me 100% guarantee she'd be safe. While delving into the topic, I came across a moving appeal of another mother to the kidnapper of her child. I decided to get in touch with her.
Speaker 2: On the day you came into my life and changed it into a nightmare, that day you kidnapped my son. Although so many years have passed by, my pain and my longing for him have grown even bigger. Finding Tomok is the sense of my life. Do you know how it hurts to be separated for such a long time? Do you know the pain of losing such a young child?
My husband was upstairs, and we were in the course of building our house. The first thing I did when I entered our property was ask him where Tomok was. He said he had seen him playing ten or fifteen minutes before. I looked around, but he was nowhere to be seen. I put down my shopping bag with groceries and walked back outside.
I called out to him, to no avail. I remained outside the house. I sat on the steps, not knowing what to do with myself. I didn't know where to go. In the dark, I stumbled into the worst and the darkest places despite being a total coward.
On such occasions, you feel no fear. You do not fear for yourself. It's your priority to find the missing child. While sitting on those steps, I began to pray. I said, God, if you need to punish someone, punish me and spare the child.
Don't let him feel the pain of separation. Because a child is not an object that we throw away once we get bored with it. It's a living being.
Speaker 0: You've got
Speaker 2: to fend for it. You can't give up. So thirty years later, I'm still fighting, and I believe my son is alive.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 5/7🧵 Hell Is empty and all the devils are here... -The Tempest, Act 2, Scene 1, Shakespeare Post 6👇🏽 https://t.co/f8BbH1Llt1
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is an age progression image of Tomok in his twenties, and the aim is to show what Tomok would look like at age 22. In 2015, a Facebook profile titled Tomok's profile was created as a missing-person appeal. When Tomok’s age-progression image was publicized, a message came from a fake account claiming that missing Tomok was now Ryan Pitts and providing his whereabouts. The observer says, upon seeing the photograph, “this is my Tomok.” The two men resembled each other so closely that the Polish police contacted the FBI. The question is whether the FBI did all they could. The answer given is that the FBI checked Ryan Pitts’s birth certificate because he had married and would need a valid birth certificate, and they reported back that the birth certificate was original and that there was no prior information about him, with no verified place or date of birth, and differing dates of birth cited on different sites. All information about Ryan begins from the age of five, according to the statement.
The speaker criticizes the FBI, claiming they failed and dropped the case too early without explaining the kidnapping. In researching the family’s past, information was found that Ryan’s grandparents were patrons of an orphanage in their town, suggesting that swapping one child for another would not be difficult. Ryan Pitts is described as a soldier decorated by President Obama; after the decoration, interviews appeared, including one with his grandmother stating that Ryan had to fight for himself since early childhood. The speakers note that the speakers’ husband’s and their own DNA are in general databases; they claim US Army soldiers submit their DNA, and DNA results would be available, but Ryan Pitts does not consent to DNA verification, and only a court could compel it.
Ryan Pitts lives in the USA with a wife and a child; if it turns out he is Marcelina’s kid, Tomok, Tomok would lose American citizenship rights and be deported to Poland. They claim he would not have the right to stay because documents of origin would be forged, and he would do everything to avoid tests that would reveal this, threatening the end of his family. The speaker states that they would die without knowing the truth and the ending of the case.
To ensure Marcelina’s safety, the speaker concluded that he had to save her by himself and moved into negotiation with the traffickers, asking what deal was needed to stop the child from being sold for organs or to a brothel. They discuss potential deals: money, or an exchange, such as a “slut for a slut” or a body for a body, or even trading an adult for the child, with additional payments or barter. The traffickers are described as caring only about money and being willing to exchange or sell; if an urgent organ sale occurred, they would not hesitate to act.
The speaker claims to have solved the problem by taking the baby from traffickers and saving it from being sold, with no one’s throat cut. The mother then chooses to give the baby up for legal adoption, and a Catholic facility is proposed for the adoption. They discuss filling an application stating a reason to facilitate adoption and the need to describe it in words, without detailing the events. They await the court hearing for the mother to confirm consent to adoption. The mother eventually agrees to the statement in court, and the protocol is printed.
The exchange ends with the belief that if one child is saved, thousands can be saved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is an age progression image of Tomok in his twenties.
Speaker 1: I hope this progression shows exactly what Tomok would look like at the age of 22. In 2015, we set up a Facebook profile. Tomok's profile. A missing person. The moment my appeal to the kidnapper came out, and Tomok's age progression was publicized.
We got a message with a photo from what later turned out to be a fake account that Tomok that missing Tomok was now Ryan Pitts. It also included his whereabouts. When I opened that photograph, I almost passed out. I sat on a stool and said, God almighty, this is my Tomok.
Speaker 0: The two men were so similar that the Polish police decided to contact the FBI. Do you think the FBI did all they could?
Speaker 1: They checked it just to get us off their back. So we leave them alone. I know our side was putting pressure on them.
Speaker 0: FBI said they'd check Ryan Pitt's birth certificate.
Speaker 1: Because he got married there, he had to have a valid copy of his birth certificate. Right? And they sent us information that his birth certificate was checked and that it was an original document. And that was it. There is no prior information about him.
No place of birth. Even his date of birth differs on different sites on the Internet. So it really makes me wonder. And all the information that you can find about him starts from the age
Speaker 2: of five.
Speaker 0: In my opinion, FBI failed. They dropped the case too early and didn't explain the kidnapping.
Speaker 1: Doing the research on that family's past, we found information that Ryan's grandparents were patrons of an orphanage located in their town. I guess switching one kid with another wouldn't be difficult at all.
Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts was a soldier decorated by president Obama.
Speaker 1: When he was decorated by president Obama, Several interviews appeared, and there was an interview with his grandmother told Ryan's story. In that interview she made it clear that Ryan had to fight for himself since his early childhood. My husband's DNA and mine are in the general database, and they are available for verification. It's generally known that all the US Army soldiers submit their DNA, So the DNA results are available in the US military database, but no one wants to give us access to it. So there is the possibility to verify that.
Ryan himself doesn't want to give his consent. He doesn't agree for DNA verification, and we cannot force him to do that. Only the court would be able to do it.
Speaker 0: Ryan Pitts lives in The USA. He has a wife and a child there. If it turns out that he's the kidnapped boy, Tomic, within a day, would lose the rights of an American citizen and would be deported to Poland.
Speaker 1: He wouldn't have the right to stay there because it would mean that all the documents of his origin had been forged. He'll do everything to avoid these tests because they would mean the end of his family. I'm afraid that I'll die without knowing the truth and the ending to this case.
Speaker 0: I came to the conclusion that in order to have 100% guarantee that Marcelina would be safe, I had to save her by myself. I moved to the negotiation phase, and I asked the evil one what I had to do to save a child. Wants to sell a child for organs or to a brothel through you. What deal do I have to make with you to stop it from happening?
Speaker 3: Oh, fuck. Then we would be taking money.
Speaker 0: What money? First of all,
Speaker 3: you wouldn't be talking to me. I doubt it. Because? It would be I think that It would be mister
Speaker 0: Is there anything apart from money that could motivate them?
Speaker 3: You'd have to come up with some sort of deal with them. But you work in a different sector, so you won't make a deal with them. They only care about money.
Speaker 0: What? What type of a deal?
Speaker 3: Some sort of exchange? A slut for a slut? A body for a body?
Speaker 0: So I'd have to give them some girl?
Speaker 3: You'd have to do something bad.
Speaker 0: Sell a girl for a kid?
Speaker 3: You'd have to do something bad.
Speaker 0: Or another kid for a kid. Exactly. Or what if I exchanged an adult person for that kid?
Speaker 3: 100%. That would also work? 100%.
Speaker 0: It would work for sure?
Speaker 3: Yes. But for what you want, you'd have to pay additionally. So here, there would be some amount to pay. Or an exchange. Or barter.
Speaker 0: So if I offered a guy or a woman, I'd have to pay additionally because they would be worth less than a child?
Speaker 3: You'd have to pay additionally one way or another. But if someone was in an urgent need for organs, you wouldn't afford such a deal.
Speaker 2: If we made a deal with those people that we'd sell them a child and they'd give us money, we wouldn't be able to back out. Because for those people, too much money is at stake. They don't give a shit about us and that child. They only care for real American dollars and nothing else. These people are devoid of human emotions.
So if they are able to sell an alive child for organs, they will not think twice to cut our throats. It won't be a problem for them whatsoever.
Speaker 0: I solved that problem. I took the baby over from the traffickers and I saved it from being sold, and no one cut anybody's throat.
Speaker 3: Soon, the
Speaker 0: mother came to a decision to give the baby up for legal adoption. The mother didn't care what would happen to the baby, taking into consideration the set of circumstances, I recommended to her that a Catholic facility should take care of the adoption.
Speaker 2: You have to fill in the application. If you want, I can tell you which adoption facility she will be taken. It will be a Catholic one. Yes. I really want a Catholic facility.
Then you'll have to write a few sentences. The reason? I don't expect you to describe anything in detail, but it must be here for sure. You have to put it in words somehow. I cannot tell you what to write.
You have to come up with it yourself.
Speaker 0: I was waiting for the date of the court hearing, during which the mother was to confirm if she was actually giving her baby up for adoption. In the meantime, she went to a Catholic adoption center.
Speaker 2: How's baby? Do you have any information? She's healthy. Pretty. Is she Everything is really good.
I have one picture. Could I see that picture? I have it somewhere in my phone. Okay.
Speaker 3: Now you really fucked me up, Patrick. You fucking smashed me into small pieces.
Speaker 0: Trafficker realized that during our meetings, he told me too much.
Speaker 3: You fucked me up. Really fucked me up. Because I see the way you look at me. And I see in your eyes. You know what?
I don't wanna see you anymore. I don't want it. I saw your eyes. This stuff we talked about, I do it. I do it too.
Do you know that I've already called all my friends? And I asked them if they can imagine me as a pedophile. Do you know how fucking bad I feel about that?
Speaker 0: A man has no chance to win with a devil because the devil is million times more intelligent than we are. What we deal with is horrible, manipulative, merciless power. But when a man is close to God, then devil doesn't stand a chance. And it roars angrily like a lion because it knows that it has already lost. Unable to get to me, the devil attacked the child trafficker.
Speaker 3: Do you know I wanted to fucking end my life? I really wanted to fucking do it. I called my kid. I called my son. And I told him, these are the last words you'll hear from me.
I already cut my wrists. You know? Because of our conversations, I cut my wrists. I fucking cut my wrists. I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: Finally, the day of the court proceedings came, during which the mother was supposed to confirm her consent to give Marcelina up for adoption. I wanted to have proof this would happen.
Speaker 2: I'll start recording. We've been waiting here for twenty minutes already. Do you agree to that statement? Yes. I do.
And this consent is given in full conscience, isn't it? Okay. Let's print the protocol. Thank you very much. Goodbye.
Goodbye.
Speaker 0: If I manage to save one child, together, we're able to save thousands.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵Post 6/7🧵 https://t.co/nMLgC5esj9 Post 7👇🏽
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1968, Israel performed its first heart transplant using a heart taken without consent from a living patient; the family discovered the missing heart after questioning the circumstances of his death, raising serious ethical and legal questions. In 1998, Alastair Sinclair, a Scottish national, died under suspicious circumstances while in Israeli custody; his heart was missing upon return to Scotland, prompting international outcry and demands for transparency.
The Israeli health ministry admitted cases of illegal organ harvesting from dead people, including Palestinians in the 1990s. Admitted organs had been taken from the dead, sometimes without the consent of their families. Yehuda Hiss told an American researcher that skin, corneas, heart valves, and bones had come not only from the bodies of Palestinians, but also from Israeli soldiers, Israeli citizens, and even foreign workers.
Reports indicate that from 2001 to 2003, Israelis were heavily involved in international organ trafficking, with kidneys being harvested from impoverished communities in Brazil and South Africa. Nancy Shepherd Hughes, from the Organs Watch Project, testified that the former director of a Tel Aviv hospital promoted international organ trafficking. In 2007, several Israeli nationals were prosecuted for involvement in organ trafficking rings, exploiting mentally ill individuals for illegal transplants. In 2009, Levi Isaac Rosenbaum was arrested in New Jersey for running an illegal kidney trafficking operation, marking the first such case in the United States.
There have been numerous reports of young Palestinian men disappearing, only to return with signs of organ removal, leading to widespread fear and accusations of organ theft.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1968, Israel performed its first heart transplant using a heart taken without consent from a living patient. The family discovered the missing heart after questioning the circumstances of his death. This incident raised serious ethical and legal questions. In 1998, Alastair Sinclair, a Scottish national, died under suspicious circumstances while in Israeli custody. His heart was missing upon return to Scotland, prompting international outcry and demands for transparency.
Speaker 1: Israeli health ministry has admitted cases of illegal organ harvesting from dead people, including Palestinians in the nineteen nineties. Admitted organs had been taken from the dead, sometimes without the consent of their families. Yehuda Hiss told an American researcher that skin, corneas, heart valves, and bones had come not only from the bodies of Palestinians, but also from Israeli soldiers, Israeli citizens, and even foreign workers.
Speaker 0: Reports indicate that from 2001 to 2003, Israelis were heavily involved in international organ trafficking, with kidneys being harvested from impoverished communities in Brazil and South Africa. Nancy Shepherd Hughes, from the Organs Watch Project, testified that the former director of a Tel Aviv hospital promoted international organ trafficking. In 2007, several Israeli nationals were prosecuted for involvement in organ trafficking rings, exploiting mentally ill individuals for illegal transplants. In 2009, Levi Isaac Rosenbaum was arrested in New Jersey for running an illegal kidney trafficking operation, marking the first such case in The U. S.
There have been numerous reports of young Palestinian men disappearing, only to return with signs of organ removal, leading to widespread fear and accusations of organ theft.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵Thread🧵7/7🧵 Luke 17 Verse 2 http://2.It would be better for them to be thrown into the sea with a millstone tied around their neck than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.  If you want to shed light 💡on this darkness👺… Feel free to share the post 🙏🏽 Christ is still King 👑
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@Gsteel2020 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@whos2know2024 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@vernia22 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@bokacrnooka 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@AskettilBrian No we don’t know
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@AdamNorth321 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@MyWayIsBack S e e k and d e s t r o y
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@JulieKi53713414 🎯🎯
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@bigdreams_2016 @threadreaderapp please unroll :)
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@repelsteel2023 Agreed
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@dgr3417 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@SandraTopRocker 🙏🏽
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“Hitler’s True Ancestry Confirmed.” For educational/historical purposes only https://t.co/mjpKria1Wo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion addresses a rumor about Hitler’s ancestry. The claim, circulating since the late 1920s or early 1930s, states that Hitler’s grandmother, Maria Schickelgruber, worked in a Jewish household and became pregnant there. Foreign media amplified the story, and Hitler allegedly took steps to publish an official family tree showing no Jewish ancestry to minimize potential harm.
The conversation then turns to genetics, noting that Y chromosome data appears to support the official version of Hitler’s lineage. Because the Y chromosome traces the male line, a genuine Jewish ancestry would not produce the same Y chromosome match with a male-line relative. Therefore, the Y chromosome data is said to back the Nazi version of his family tree and dispel the rumor.
The speakers conclude that, based on the DNA evidence, the rumor about Jewish ancestry can be put to bed, affirming certainty about the lineage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So where does this rumor come from that Hitler had Jewish ancestry?
Speaker 1: It's been around for a very long time since the late nineteen twenties, early nineteen thirties that Hitler's grandmother, Maria Schickelgruber, had worked for a period of time in a Jewish household and had got pregnant. Foreign media got hold of this, made a big thing out of it, and Hitler was clearly quite concerned about the potential damage it would do. And therefore, he took steps to publish an official version of his family tree, which made clear that there was no Jewish ancestry.
Speaker 0: Can Hitler's DNA shed light on the ancestry of his grandfather? This is where the y chromosome data actually backs up that Nazi version of his family tree because the y chromosome is showing that Hitler is indeed a Hitler or he wouldn't get that DNA match with the male line relative. If he had Jewish ancestry, that match wouldn't be there. So we can actually put that rumor about Jewish ancestry to bed based on the DNA.
Speaker 1: Exactly. Now we know for certain.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
A little more on the subject… https://t.co/jKweDYrxng
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the persistence of claims that Adolf Hitler was Jewish, Zionist, or connected to Jewish heritage, and argues that these claims are unfounded and perpetuated by rumor rather than solid evidence. He notes how the Internet has changed information dissemination, making it easy for unvetted claims to spread globally.
Key points:
- Two prevalent themes in the Patriot movement are (1) that the Nazis took over America, with claims like Jim Mars promoting this fraud, and (2) the claim that Adolf Hitler was Jewish, used by some to distance themselves from antisemitism.
- Adolf Hitler was not Jewish. The speaker cites Martin Kerr’s 1982 essay, The Myth of Hitler’s Jewish Grandfather, to outline why the Jewish-grandfather claim is unsubstantiated.
- Kerr explains several versions of the myth:
- The notion that Alois Hitler’s fatherhood came from a Jewish grandfather named Frankenberger or a Rothschild figure, which Kerr states are unsupported by evidence. The speaker notes that Alois Hitler’s paternity can’t be linked to such figures, and a photo does not support those genealogies.
- The claim that a Polish Jew named Hitler (a name shared by a Jewish newspaper figure) was Hitler’s grandfather is invalid because that Jew was born in 1832, only five years older than Hitler’s father, making him impossible as the sire.
- Claims from an anti-Hitler German who was part Jewish are dismissed as unfounded.
- Hans Frank’s memoirs (In the Face of the Gallows) are discussed, where Frank claimed he investigated threats to expose Hitler’s alleged Jewish ancestor, but the speaker notes it’s impossible to document a Jewish grandfather for Hitler. Werner Maeser, a German historian, is cited: no Frankenberger family lived in Graz in the 1830s, a Jewish presence there was absent, and Maria Schickelgruber (Hitler’s mother) could not have been impregnated by a Jew in Graz prior to Alois’s birth.
- Ian Kershaw is cited as noting there was no evidence of a Jewish Frankenberger in Graz; Frankenreiter existed but was not Jewish.
- The speaker emphasizes that Hitler’s alleged Jewish ancestry is unsupported by credible scholarship. He mentions that some narratives arise from a book sometimes titled Hitler, Founder of Germany or Hitler, founder of Israel, which he criticizes as poorly translated and unconvincing evidence. He mentions Colonel Don DeGrand Prix referenced this questionable book, but the speaker asserts the book’s content is weak.
- He distinguishes that while there were Jews in Hitler’s military due to Nuremberg Laws’ definitions, and some individuals of Jewish descent fought in German forces, this does not prove Hitler was Jewish or Zionist.
- He asserts: Hitler was not Jewish, not Zionist, and not Rothschild-connected. He warns against repeating rumors and urges reliance on solid research.
- He reiterates that the idea of Hitler being Jewish, a Zionist, or connected to the Rothschilds is a myth, and insists listeners should abandon it and seek verifiable evidence. He ends by stating there were elements in Hitler’s government that supported Jewish immigration to Palestine for strategic reasons, but that does not equate to Hitler being Zionist or Jewish.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome back here, Michael Collins Piper. You know, years ago, folks, when I was writing for the old spotlight newspaper, we had a third of a million paid subs more than a third of a million paid subscribers at one point. That's a lot anyway you cut it. And the pass on rate was probably $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 or more.
It's a lot of people for an independent newspaper like the Spotlight. That was long before the days of the Internet. Now the Internet has added a whole new element to the dissemination of information. Anyone in the world can put out information and it can be circulated worldwide and no one can I love that term vet it? No one can edit it.
It can just get out there and people pick it up and pass it on. Now it's really funny, folks, the subject of Adolf Hitler. Now of course, we know that we can't turn around without seeing Adolf Hitler in the daily news. I don't mean the daily news out of New York. I mean the daily news in your daily newspaper, all the big magazines, the history channel, some call it the Hitler channel.
Yeah. It's always around us. Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust and the poor persecuted Jews. And now, of course, in the Patriot movement, there are two running themes which are often intermeshed. One, of course, is that the Nazis have taken over America.
Jim Mars is perpetrating this fraud with the assistance of certain patriot broadcasters and other writers. And then there is the other fraud, which has been around for an even longer amount of time, and that is the idea that Adolf Hitler was Jewish. A lot of the people who say this say this because they wanna show that they're not pro Hitler. They say, well, you know, Hitler was Jewish. So therefore, that somehow takes away from them being accused of antisemitism since, of course, Hitler was known as the great antisemite.
I've never quite figured out the psychology behind that. But be that as it may, that is one of the themes. Now the problem is, ladies and gentlemen, Adolf Hitler was not Jewish. Adolf Hitler was not Jewish. And there is a lot of good solid information to refute the stories that Adolf Hitler was Jewish.
One of them was written by a gentleman named Martin Kerr. You can find this on the Internet. It's entitled the myth of Hitler's, quote, unquote, Jewish grandfather, and the author is Martin Kerr, k e r r. He wrote this essay in 1982. I'm not going to read it in detail, folks, but I do wanna read a couple excerpts from it.
Now as he puts it, basically, the story that Adolf Hitler stems the story that Adolf Hitler was Jewish stems from the fact that his father, Alois Hitler, was illegitimate. The legend is that Adolf Hitler's grandfather was actually a Jewish gentleman named Frankenberger or in the alternative version of the story that he was actually a Rothschild. Well, first of all first of all, if you look at a picture of Adolf Hitler's father around 65, Mr. Kerr writes correctly, does this man really look like his father was a Rothschild or a Frankenburger? No, he does not.
But the proof is much greater than that. However, as Martin Kerr writes, unusual or not, the legitimacy of Alois Hitler has served as a crucial factual base for those who seek to spread the falsehood that Hitler had a Jewish grandfather. Now what's interesting is some of the proof they used to say that Hitler could have been Jewish or that there might have been Jewish blood in the Hitler family was the fact that there was once a Polish Jew who had the name Hitler. Jew the Jewish newspaper in The United States, the forward, which I quote oftentimes in this newspaper, spread this story further, the implication being that a certain Polish Jew was Hitler's grandfather. However, as mister Kerr points out, since this specific Jew was born in 1832, he was only five years older than Hitler's father, which meant that he couldn't have been the man who sired Hitler's father.
So that was the first Jewish grandfather story about Hitler. Then the next claim that Hitler was Jewish came from an anti Hitler German who was part Jewish. Well, that wasn't true. Now the one that receives the claim that receives the most circulation was written by Hans Frank. Now incidentally, that's as in Anne Frank or Anne Frank, who was Jewish.
Now Hans Frank or Frank was not Jewish, at least so far as we know. But in his memoir, the English translation of which was in the face of the galas, this former Nazi lawyer and governor general of Poland, he was awaiting execution at Nuremberg. And in this, he goes on to claim that he investigated at Hitler's orders the threat to expose Hitler's alleged Jewish ancestor. Now what's interesting is that it's just absolutely impossible it's absolutely impossible to document this claim that Hitler's grandfather was Jewish. Werner Maeser, a German historian and biographer of Adolf Hitler, investigated this story.
He says that none of the Frankenburgers known to have lived in Graz could have been the father of Alois Schickelgruber, Hitler, nor does there appear to be any trace of a German Jew bearing this name or any variant thereof in the nineteenth century. Indeed, from the end of the fifteenth century until a decade after Maria Schickelgruber's death, that's Hitler's mother, no Jews were residents of Graz. Under the terms of the treaty between Emperor Maximilian and the Styrian towns, all Jews were expelled from the province. He goes on to say, after summarizing all this, it is impossible that in 1836, Adolf Hitler's paternal grandmother, Maria Anna Schickelgruber, could have become pregnant by a Jew in Graz named Frankenberger prior to giving birth to Alois Schickelgruber, who later changed his name to Hitler, which was the name of his real father in 1837. Now Hans Frank told this story after he'd been in Allied custody, after he had been undoubtedly tortured, certainly mentally distressed.
And yet, today, people cite this story. It goes on and on. It goes on and on, ladies and gentlemen. There is just absolutely, what what Martin Kerr has written here just absolutely refutes the idea that Adolf Hitler was part Jewish. And it's funny because I have even heard some of the people who put out this claim that Hitler was Jewish claim that it was his mother's name Schickelgruber, which was Jewish, but that isn't the official story.
And there was no family named Frankenberger. Now here here is what Ian Kershaw, a more interesting historian writes. He's talking about Hans Frank's story. There was no Jewish family called Frankenberger in Graz during the eighteen thirties. A family named Frankenreiter did live there but was not Jewish.
There is no evidence that Maria was ever in Graz, let alone by employed let alone employed by Frankenreiter, who, of course, was not Jewish. Now there's a claim that Adolf Hitler was afraid his Jewish background would be discovered. But the point is this, that Popular's story is based on the theme that one of his nephews tried to blackmail Hitler, saying that and the story is is that this nephew tried to blackmail Hitler over the story about the family having Jewish background. But the problem with that is that the Hitler family has said that that wasn't even part of the equation in the first place. It goes on and on, ladies and gentlemen.
Adolf Hitler was not Jewish. It's a legend. It's it's just not true. And anyone who says it is is is perpetuating a lie. Now they have various reasons for doing it among of most of which, I think, a lot of it stems from the fact not because they're Jewish agents, but because they think that by somehow condemning Adolf Hitler, the great villain of the twentieth century, that this will somehow divert attention from them.
I I it's it always amazes me. I I hear these people in interviews and in their writing talking about the Jews this and the Jews that. The Jews have done all these terrible things to mankind. The Jews hate Christianity, which indeed they do. They go on and on with a litany of complaints about the Jews, most of which, perhaps all of which, are justified.
And then in the next breath, they will say, but, of course, then, you know, Adolf Hitler was Jewish. Well, the funny thing is the primary modern version of the story that has come out in many years is based upon reports from a book called Hitler, Founder of Germany, I think is the name of it. I have information here. Let me verify that because it's so often quoted. It's a book by a German who may or may not have been Jewish.
It's not very clear as to what what his background is. But it's a book that implies that not only Hitler, but many, many people in the Hitler government were Jewish. Well, first of all, we've already discussed Hitler. But those other people who are often named as being Jewish, no. No.
No. No. No. They weren't Jewish. But here's the problem.
This this particular book, Hitler, the father of Israel, or some some such title, for some reason, I can't find it in my notes here, but it's a book that's often quoted. That particular book, I saw it early on when it first came out. It's kind of this is the the the the the the story of this is kind of sad because I I I had first heard about that book from an old friend of mine. And at the time, I said to him, you know, I really don't think I don't think that that book is very, very reliable because of reading that I had done. The book, I believe, was Adolf Hitler, founder of Israel or father of Israel.
Well, unfortunately, this friend of mine who had passed that book on to me also passed that book on to colonel Don DeGrand Prix. Now I'm a big fan of Don DeGrand Prix. He's a very, very fine man. He's written some great books. He said some nice things about me.
And in his book, Barbarians Inside the Gates, Colonel Grand Prix references this book, Hitler, the Founder of Israel. Well, it's funny because I know the person who introduced that book to Don de Grand Prix. I was quite frankly surprised then that Colonel Grand Prix wrote about it in his book. Since that time, many, many people have cited that book, Colonel Grand Prix's book, as evidence that Hitler was Jewish, but in fact, colonel Grand Prix was basing it upon this book, which if you've ever actually read the book, you'll you'll see folks that it's really a very, very strange little book, not Grand Prix's book, but the other book. It's very, very poorly written.
Certainly, it was translated from the German, it's very poorly translated. And it's largely unconvincing. And the actual paragraphs and information that is cited referencing the alleged Jewish ancestry of Adolf Hitler and all of these other people are are actually only a few only a few chapters, not even chapters, actually only a few paragraphs in the entirety of the book itself. So so it's not true. Hitler was not Jewish.
A lot of his top people were not Jewish. There's only one person in the upper ranks of Hitler's inner circle who may have been Jewish, and many, many, many, many people would dispute that is Alfred Rosenberg. And don't be fooled by the name Rosenberg because that is a Baltic name that has not been identified as Jewish in those regions, just as there are Goldbergs in Germany who are not Jewish. So in this case, what's in a name may be nothing at all. Now, of course, yes, there were Jews in Hitler's military.
Yes, people of Jewish descent in Hitler's military, but that's because of the fact that the Nuremberg Laws specifically outlined who would be determined to be Jewish and who would not be. And there were certain people who were of Jewish descent who were in the German military and who evidently were loyal Germans, even though they happen to be of Jewish descent. So folks, I'm here to tell you, the stories are not true. If you ever believe anything that I say, believe this, that the evidence is just not there. There's a lot of scattered rumors that have been refuted, but people never study the refutations.
They only run with the rumors. And that's the problem. People run with the rumors for their own particular reasons to fulfill their own agenda. A lot of people feel that if they say as I say, if they say that Hitler was a Zionist, Hitler was Jewish. No.
Hitler was no more a Zionist than Mark Glenn as a Zionist or I am a Zionist or Rick Adams as a Zionist. No. There were elements in Adolf Hitler's government that did encourage Jewish immigration to Palestine. It was in their interest at the time to encourage Jewish immigration out of Europe. But folks, if Hitler was a Zionist, then there to me were many Muslim and Arab volunteers in the anti communist legions of the SS in Germany, the German legions.
I have a whole book on that. I have two books on it, little booklets I'm holding in my hand written by authorities. Here's the Lions of the Arab Volunteers in the German Army. And then they had the Muslim legions in the SS. No.
No. No. No, ladies and gentlemen. Hitler was not a Zionist, and Hitler was not Jewish. Please abandon the myth.
Tell people that it is a myth. It's another one of those little poisons that poisons the waters. I hate to burst so many bubbles by talking about this, but it needs to be talked about. Good solid research refutes it. Go with the research, not the rumors, ladies and gentlemen.
I've only given you the tip of the iceberg for God's sake. No. Hitler wasn't Jewish and Hitler wasn't a Zionist. No. No.
No. No. No. So the thing is, those of you who have heard at least part of the facts tonight here about Adolf Hitler not being Jewish, now you know the truth. You can look it up for yourself.
The people who say that Hitler was a Rothschild, that he was part of the Illuminati bloodline, that he was this and that and part of the grand conspiracy. Boy. Like, Martin Kerr writes, you know, in his essay that I quoted here, if Hitler was so well connected, why didn't he use his family connections to get himself a good desk job? The guy was on the front lines as a courier risking his life right in the middle of the battlefield. Oh, you know what the answer to that is?
Well, he didn't really do all that. That was just part of the mythology the Rothschilds put out about him. No, folks. It wasn't. Hitler was not a Rothschild.
Hitler was not a Jew. Hitler was not a Zionist. Hitler was not pro Zionist. No. No.
No. No. No.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Michael Jackson's relationship with the Jewish community included both positive interactions, such as friendships, and accusations of anti-Semitism. Starring Michael Jackson, Rabbi Marvin Hier, Bobby Fischer, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Milo. For educational/historical purposes only
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Michael Jackson's relationship with the jewish community included both positive and negative aspects. While he had positive interactions, such as friendships, he also faced accusations of “anti-semitism.” Starring: Michael Jackson Rabbi Marvin Hier Bobby Fischer Kamala Harris Donald Trump Milo For educational/historical purposes only
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on a controversial set of statements made by Michael Jackson and surrounding reactions. It opens with Speaker 0 stating, “I'm shocked. Jew me, sue me, kick me, kite me. Those are the words that he told us that he would never use,” highlighting a phrase Jackson allegedly defended as not something he would say. Speaker 1 adds, “I want people to get the picture. So they shut up talking about, don't Jew me. You understand? Yep.” The implication is that the language became a focal point in discussions about Jackson, not necessarily a verdict about his character, with Speaker 1 suggesting that people should stop saying “don’t Jew me” and that “Michael Jackson is a to be convicted of this child molestation because he said don’t you me in a storm,” though the phrasing is ambiguous in the transcription.
Speaker 2 notes that “this can depend on the testimony of the child accuser,” while Speaker 3 discusses the general reliability of a child’s recall, stating, “In general, the child will be able to recall and recollect with some detail the incident, and that is persuasive to a jury even if it is the only testimony that is available.” Speaker 4 asks, “Should we light the candle?” and Speaker 3 confirms, “Yeah. Let's do it.” The scene shifts to Jackson’s legal status: “Jackson gave a wave when he was released after booking. He's scheduled for arraignment in January,” per Speaker 2.
Speaker 5 mentions Michael Jackson’s long residence at Trump Tower and describes how Donald Trump defended Jackson in a Larry King interview by attacking the accuser’s mother, saying she has “plenty of experience at going after people, and she goes after them viciously and violently.” The speaker adds that Jackson spent time with Trump’s children and “loved children,” asserting, “He was not a child molester.” Another voice claims, “They murdered Michael Jackson after he started talking about Jews,” acknowledging that while the speaker does not judge the content of Jackson’s statements, it is a “fact of history” that he was in Brazil to shoot the music video for “They Don’t Care About Us,” and that he angered Jewish groups by the controversial lyrics—though he later changed the song under pressure, the controversial lyrics were back when performed in Brazil.
Speaker 6 reiterates Jackson’s controversial stance, saying, “There’s been another issue raised in a song you say, and some people are saying that that is antisemitic. It’s not antisemitic because I’m not a racist person. I could never be a racist. I love all races of people from Arabs to Jewish people, like I said before, to blacks. But when I say Jew me, sue me, everybody do me, kick me, kite me, don’t you black or white me, I’m talking about myself as the victim.” Finally, Speaker 3 reports, “Apparently, Michael Jackson suffered cardiac arrest this afternoon. He was rushed to UCLA Medical Center.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm shocked. Jew me, sue me, kick me, kite me. Those are the words that he told us that he would never use.
Speaker 1: I want people to get the picture. Yeah. So they shut up talking about, don't Jew me. You understand? Yep.
In other words, they don't say Michael Jackson is a very bad person and he should be convicted of this child molestation because he said don't you me in a storm.
Speaker 2: Like this can depend on the testimony of the child accuser.
Speaker 3: In general, the child will be able to recall and recollect with some detail the incident, and that is persuasive to a jury even if it is the only testimony that is available.
Speaker 4: Should we light the candle?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Let's do
Speaker 0: it. Okay. Okay?
Speaker 2: Jackson gave a wave when he was released after booking. He's scheduled for arraignment in January.
Speaker 5: Michael's been a longtime resident of Trump Tower. Last night, the Donald strongly reiterated his defense of Jackson with Larry King by going after the accuser's mother.
Speaker 4: She's had plenty of experience at going after people, and she goes after them viciously and violently. Michael would spend a lot of time with my kids. I have beautiful kids. And at the time, like at Mar A Lago and even in Trump Tower, the kids were very young. Michael would come play with the kids.
He just loved children. He was not a child molester.
Speaker 5: They murdered Michael Jackson after he started talking about Jews. And I'm not gonna say that what he said about them was right or wrong or whether whatever, but it is a fact of history. He was in Brazil to shoot the music video for his song, They Don't Care About Us. Last year, he angered Jewish groups when he sang these words. Michael then gave in to pressure and changed the song, but in Brazil, the controversial lyrics were back and he sang it this way.
Speaker 6: There's been another issue raised in a song you say, and some people are saying that that is antisemitic. It's not antisemitic because I'm not a racist person. I could never be a racist. I love all races of people from Arabs to Jewish people, like I said before, to blacks. But when I say Jew me, sue me, everybody do me, kick me, kite me, don't you black or white me, I'm talking about myself as the victim.
Speaker 3: Apparently, Michael Jackson suffered cardiac arrest this afternoon. He was rushed to UCLA Medical Center.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Classic “It wasn’t true, but in my imagination it was all true” https://t.co/V3gFoI1oMB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Herman Rosenblatt told an extraordinary story of survival in Nazi concentration camps, including a renowned tale of being a hungry boy who was fed apples daily by a girl beyond the fence, and later meeting and proposing to her in New York. This narrative, which brought Herman and his wife Roma Rosenblatt wide attention—Oprah appearances, international headlines, a book deal, and a movie deal—turned out not to be true. Herman insisted during the interview that it was not a lie but imagination: “in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it… I believed it that she was there, and she threw the apple to me.” He maintained that the story was important to give people hope and to promote understanding about the Holocaust.
Herman’s son disputed the motivation, claiming money was a factor and that his father lied for years. He said, “My father is a man who I don’t know,” and that his father knew he was lying. Herman rejected the charge of financial motive, saying he was not motivated by money, though the interview indicated his family’s skepticism about his intentions.
The couple publicly promoted the story for more than a decade until Holocaust scholars recently proved it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the camp where Herman was kept, and Roma’s family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. When asked why Roma agreed to participate, Herman replied that she loves him and that if she thinks something is good for him, she’ll go along with it; she has not appeared on the show because “she’s too much going on.”
Roma’s participation was difficult for her as well; she acknowledged it was challenging for her to tell a story she knew wasn’t true, but she did it out of love for Herman. Herman remained unapologetic about the years of deception, saying, “I pronounce my love for you forever,” and that he would tell the same story again if given the chance. He expressed that he is sorry people took the story the wrong way, although he did not retract the core claim that it was a fantasy world he lived in.
The controversy affected a nonfiction memoir deal, which fell through, while a fictionalized book and a movie adaptation—produced or planned by Harris Solomon—were in progress, with shooting anticipated in Eastern Europe. Critics and Holocaust-denier websites were using the case to argue against the credibility of survivors, though Herman asserted the work was done with good intentions and that the public should know what he did in his imagination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Roman Rosenblatt does have a real story of survival in the Nazi concentration camps, a story that is genuinely extraordinary. But as he explained to us in this exclusive interview, he felt he needed to make things up to get people to pay attention. This is
Speaker 1: the The greatest love story we've ever told on
Speaker 0: this show. Oh my. Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot.
Speaker 1: They used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 0: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long?
Speaker 2: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it that she was there, and she threw the apple to me.
Speaker 0: How can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true.
Speaker 2: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true.
Speaker 0: Rosenblatt says he made the story up to give people hope and to promote understanding about the Holocaust. But members of his own family say his real motivation was money. So you were not motivated in any way by money? No. This is from your son.
He said that he knew you were lying for years and he couldn't get you to stop, and here's his quote. It was always hurtful. My father is a man who I don't know. How do you respond to that?
Speaker 2: I don't know. I can't respond to it. I don't know why he said that. I don't know what maybe I'll ask him.
Speaker 0: Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Why did your wife agree to go along with this? Did she ever express any regret? She loves me. Why is she not here today?
Speaker 2: Because I don't want her to be here today. She's too much too much going on.
Speaker 0: Was it difficult for your wife to have to go out very publicly and tell a story that she knew wasn't true? It was.
Speaker 2: It was. But she loves me so much that if she thinks that's good for me, she'll go along
Speaker 0: with it. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying.
Speaker 2: I pronounce my love for you forever.
Speaker 0: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And and and while you were up on the stage there in front of all those people, in the back of your mind, were you not thinking No. I'm not telling the truth here. No. Let me ask you just quickly
Speaker 2: about I
Speaker 0: didn't hear you say you agreed to that. Do we agree to that? Is that Our interview was frequently interrupted by this man, Harris Solomon, who says he is planning to produce a fictionalized movie account of Rosenblatt's story despite complaints from critics. If you look on holocaust denier websites right now, they're using it as we speak as an example of why you shouldn't believe holocaust survivors. Right.
And those holocaust denier websites would perpetuate some other story if it wasn't Herman Rosenblatt. Rosenblatt says he wants people to know that he did what he did with good intentions. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would?
Yes. Rosenblatt does say that he's sorry, but he's only sorry he says that people took the story, quote, the wrong way. His book deal for a nonfiction memoir fell through a couple of weeks ago because of this controversy, but a fictionalized book may come out this summer, and the movie version is supposed to both, excuse me, supposed to start shooting this summer as well in Eastern Europe, Diane. And they say they're gonna carry on despite the criticism.
Speaker 1: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true.
Speaker 0: He says he made a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world.
Speaker 1: And his son says tried to stop him?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that historical evidence and declassified documents claim Coco Chanel collaborated with Nazi intelligence during WWII, acting as an informant for the Sicherheitsdienst. I note a romantic relationship with Hans Günther von Dincklage, and that she actively worked with the Nazis. I mention Operation Modelhut in 1944 to deliver a peace proposal to Churchill in Spain, which failed. Afterward I say she was interrogated but not charged, reportedly aided by Churchill, then moved to Switzerland before returning to Paris in 1954.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Did you know …? “Historical evidence and declassified documents show Coco Chanel collaborated with ‘Nazi’ intelligence (the Sicherheitsdienst) during WWII, acting as an informant and operative” • Romantic Relationship: “Chanel had a romantic relationship with Hans Günther von Dincklage, a German diplomat and intelligence officer.” • Intelligence Work: “She actively worked with the ‘Nazis’, becoming an informant for the Sicherheitsdienst (SD).” • Operation Modelhut: “In 1944, she was involved in a plan (Operation Modelhut) to carry a peace proposal from the ‘Nazis’ to Churchill in Spain, though it failed. • Post-War: “After the war, she was interrogated but not charged, reportedly due to Winston Churchill's intervention, and later moved to Switzerland before returning to Paris to revive her fashion house in 1954.”
reSee.it AI Summary
On 22 June 1941, Operation Barbarossa—named for Frederick Barbarossa—launched the largest land invasion, involving about 3 million Axis troops (Germany and Japan’s allies). Objectives: defeat the USSR swiftly, seize resources, destroy communism. It stretched ~3000 km with 3000 tanks and 3000 aircraft; it was a campaign, not a single battle. Soviet deaths ~1.5–2 million; Axis ~200,000–300,000. At Stalingrad (1942–43) ~2 million casualties; the defeat ended German hopes, due to underestimation, winter, overextension.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Operation Barbarossa (22 June 1941 during World War II) •Codename origin: Named after Frederick Barbarossa, a medieval Holy Roman Emperor. -The largest land invasion in history, involving about 3 million Axis troops (Germany and allies: Romania, Finland, Italy, Hungary). Objectives -Defeat the Soviet Union in a rapid campaign, capture key territories, destroy communism, and seize Soviet resources. Here's how it breaks down: -Largest invasion ever launched. -3 to 4 million Axis troops -3000 tanks, 3000 aircraft -Frontline stretched nearly 3000 km -It was a campaign, not one battle Military deaths during Operation Barbarossa -Soviet military deaths: ~1.5–2 million killed -Axis military deaths (mainly German, plus allies): ~200,000–300,000 killed The Battle of Stalingrad (1942-1943) -Total casualties; 2 million (killed wounded or captured) -Most historians agree Stalingrad the biggest and bloodiest in history -Largest tank battle. -Eventually resulted in Germany's defeat and the fall of “Nazi” Germany in 1945 -Largest single battle ever. Why it failed -Underestimated Soviet manpower and industrial capacity -Harsh Russian winter, lack of winter equipment -Overextended supply lines -Soviet resistance & counter offensives For educational/historical purposes only. All numbers are approximate.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“We have people in the United States of America that breed children in order to sell them and when they are sold they come without birth certificates…” Robert David Steele (Former CIA) https://t.co/knt4xQq54J
Video Transcript AI Summary
These excerpts discuss widespread child trafficking and abuse, presenting several serious allegations as fact. Speaker 0 describes children as being kidnapped or bred by families as a cash crop, and claims there are people in the United States who breed children to sell them. He states these children often lack birth certificates, making it easier to kill them without accountability. He alleges we are importing children by the plane load, again without documentation. He expands beyond child slavery and sex abuse to claim child torture, describing a “blood drinking ceremony of the satanic world,” ritual murder, and the use of children for harvesting body organs. He mentions ritual ceremonies and incidental murder as part of this framework. He asserts that many organizations that prey on children, such as Oxfam and United Nations organizations, as well as the Boy Scouts of America and various child services agencies in the United States, did not start out to prey on children but attract pedophiles who rise in rank, turning organizations intended to serve children into ones that hunt them. He adds that kidnapping children is not what great nations do, and laments that reality shows have warped perceptions of heroes and truth.
Speaker 1 shifts to personal testimony and historical conspiracy claims. He says he retired from the FBI in March 1979 as head of the Los Angeles division, with over 700 personnel under his command. He contends that in 1776, Adam Weisoff (Weisoff) was commissioned by the Rothschild family to create goals to control and take over the world with a one-world government, and asserts that Vaisov (likely a misspelling) proposed 25 goals, including control of the press, corrupting the youth through sex and drugs, and electing their own people in the United States. He describes a covert military criminal and government enterprise, operated primarily by US military intelligence, and alleges it is not investigated. In reference to the Nebraska case, he cites the Franklin cover-up and a book by Johnny Camp, asserting the case is well documented. He states he personally spoke with Paul Bonacci and conducted a five-hour interview in 1993, which he says is available on tape; Bonacci reportedly described being used and drew the inside living quarters of the White House. He mentions that Bonacci provided details about the White House living spaces during those sessions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These children are not just kidnapped and in some cases bred by families as a cash crop. We have people in The United States Of America that breed children in order to sell them. And when they are sold, they come without birth certificates, which means it's easier to kill them and have no one ask where they are. We're also importing children by the plane load. Again, children who have no documentation.
It's not just child slavery or child sex abuse. It's also child torture because you have a generalized blood. You you have the the whole blood drinking ceremony of the satanic world. It's also the, use of children for harvesting body organs. And then you have ritual ceremonies and ritual murder, as well as incidental murder.
Most organizations that end up being used to prey on children, Oxfam is a recent example. All of the United Nations organizations, the Boy Scouts of America, all of the child services agencies across The United States Of America, they did not start out as organizations to prey on children but they attract pedophiles and ultimately pedophiles end up rising in the ranks and controlling those organizations so that an organization that initially started out in the service of children becomes an organization that is in fact hunting children. These Kidnapping children is not what great nations do. We in America are misinformed. Reality shows have warped our idea of what a hero is or what the truth is.
Speaker 1: I retired from the FBI March 1979. At that time, I was in charge of the FBI Los Angeles division. I had more than 700 personnel under my command. Let's go back to 1776, May 1. Adam Weisoff was commissioned by the Rothschild family to set up the goals to control and take over the world with a one world government.
And Vaisov came up with 25 goals. Among these goals were control the press, corrupt the youth through sex and drugs, elect our own people that we have in this country today, a covert military criminal enterprise, government enterprise, primarily by US military intelligence that is operating in full throttle and everybody refuses to investigate it. In the Nebraska case, it's called the Franklin cover up. This is the book here that I that Johnny Camp wrote, by the way. It's all documented in there.
And in that particular instance, they were taking children out of foster homes, orphanages, Boys Town, driving them from Omaha, Nebraska to Sioux City, Iowa, a 184 miles away, placing them in private jets and flying them to Washington DC for sex orgies with prominent people, including congressmen, senators, and certain people in the White House. It's well documented. I have personally talked to Paul Bonacci. I had a five I have five hour interview with him. It's on it's a tape that's available.
I don't have it with me here, but you can order it. I have a five hour interview with Paul that I gave that he gave me in 1993. Paul told me how he was used. You Paul drew the inside living quarters of the White House.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note the highest plain-number tattoos reach about 202,000–203,000; the highest tattooed inmate number on a survivor is under 150,000; Auschwitz revised its death toll from 4 million to 1.1 million in the early 1990s. Are we missing a few tattoos?
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Auschwitz tattoo numbers Did you know…? • The highest documented plain-number tattoos are around 202,000-203,000. • The highest inmate number tattooed on a Holocaust survivor is less than 150,000. • In the early 1990s Auschwitz revised its death claim number from 4 million to 1.1 million. Are we missing a few tattoos?
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Did you know that the Israeli Diamond Industry contributes 1 billion dollars a year to the IDF? • Diamonds • DeBeers • Slave Camps• •The Rothschilds • Israel • …All in under 5 minutes. https://t.co/Y2aWETjPkR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Diamonds are forever. De Beers’ mines used a segregated compound system, where miners were virtual prisoners unable to leave until their contracts ended; once released, they had no free movement in the country. At the height of its power, Beers controlled over 90% of the world’s diamonds.
Although diamonds are relatively common in nature, De Beers could regulate how many reach consumers. They ran aggressive ad campaigns and increased the diamonds’ worth in the eyes of the general public, convincing people that there should always be shiny diamonds in wedding rings.
Happy anniversary. Steven, it’s beautiful. A diamond is forever. De Beers. Ernest Oppenheimer, seeing the potential in controlling this giant, began to buy shares in De Beers in the early nineteen twenties, and by 1929, he became the chairman of De Beers, gaining control over the company’s vast diamond interests.
You may have heard that diamonds are a girl’s best friend, but a lot of those come from Israel. If you have a diamond or ever bought one, you were probably supporting US–Israel trade even though you probably didn’t know it. The Israeli diamond industry contributes about $1,000,000,000 a year to the IDF, and every time someone buys a diamond from Israel some of that money goes to the military.
Diamonds and all the associations we have with diamonds is a product of a marketing strategy. This is probably the most successful campaign in history.
This is the closing line: Diamonds are forever forever.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Diamonds are forever. They won't leave in the night. I have no fear that they might
Speaker 1: The De Beers' mines made use of the segregated compound system. Miners were virtual prisoners unable to leave until their contracts were up. Once released from the compounds, miners had no free movement in the country. At the height of its power, Beers controlled over 90% of the world's diamonds.
Speaker 2: While diamonds are actually relatively common in nature, De Beers could regulate exactly how many consumers reach them. They did aggressive ad campaigns and increased the diamonds worth in the eyes of the general public. They convinced people that there should always be shiny diamonds in wedding rings.
Speaker 3: Happy anniversary. Steven,
Speaker 0: it's
Speaker 4: beautiful. A diamond is forever. De Beers. Ernest Oppenheimer, seeing the potential in controlling this giant, began
Speaker 5: to to buy shares in De Beers in
Speaker 4: the early nineteen twenties. And by 1929, he became the chairman of De Beers, gaining control over the company's vast diamond interests.
Speaker 6: You may have heard that diamonds are a girl's best friend, but what you might not know is that a lot of those come from Israel. If
Speaker 3: you have a diamond or ever bought one, you were probably supporting US Israel trade even though you probably didn't know it. The Israeli diamond industry contributes about $1,000,000,000 a year to the IDF and every time someone buys a diamond from Israel some
Speaker 7: of that money goes to the military.
Speaker 8: Diamonds and all the associations we have with diamonds is a product of a marketing strategy.
Speaker 9: This is probably the most successful campaign in history.
Speaker 0: Diamonds are forever forever.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
The 1939 Fall of Warsaw Last Radio Broadcast Funny how Britain and France only declared war on Germany and not the USSR as they invaded Poland just over 2 weeks later. The German Blitzkrieg explained: For historical/ educational purposes only.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript explains that armies were able to move rapidly because of how the striking spearhead was organized. Armored forces came first, mostly followed by motorized divisions, which peeled off forming solid walls. Through the corridor thus formed raced the supply trucks to feed the ever lengthening column. It was obvious that if the
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That enabled armies to move so far so rapidly. The secret lay in the organization of the striking spearhead. Armored forces came first, mostly followed by motorized divisions, which peeled off forming solid walls. And through the corridor, thus formed, raced the supply trucks to feed the ever lengthening column. It was obvious that if the
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing Martin Luther: On the Jews and Their Lies. Audio Version Part 1, Part 2, and the Online Book. Thanks to @Ca77480Mc for the idea.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵1/3 Thread Martin Luther: On The Jews And Their Lies. Audio Version Part 1 🫡 @uncensored1889 For historical/educational purposes only
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵2/3 Martin Luther: On The Jews And Their Lies. Audio Version Part 2
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Online Book: Martin Luther: On The Jews And Their Lies. Thanks @Ca77480Mc for the idea. https://archive.org/details/Luther_201906
Internet Archive: Error
archive.org
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Netanyahu talks about terrorism… “My definition of terrorism is the systematic and deliberate attack, maiming, and menacing of innocents and civilians for political goals…” https://t.co/APOcE9ldCs
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker defines terrorism as "the systematic and deliberate attack, the murder, maiming, and menacing of innocents, of civilians for political goals." They note that you can tell a lot about terrorists, but what happens when they come to power is telling. The speaker asserts that "those who fight for freedom and come to power do not impose terrorism." Conversely, "those who fight in terroristic means, end up as being masters of terrorist states."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because what terrorists do is target the innocent deliberately. And therefore, my definition of terrorism is the in the systematic and deliberate attack, the murder, maiming, and menacing of innocents, of civilians for political goals. I think that you can tell a lot about terrorists, but what happens when they come to power. Those who fight for freedom and come to power do not impose terrorism. Those who do, who fight in terroristic means, end up as being masters of terrorist states.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Adin Ross reacts after Jake Paul admits that he is jewish. https://t.co/hWc4Pr94vH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The interaction opens with a direct question about Jewish identity: “Are you Jewish?” The response is affirmative in part—“Yeah.” There is a fragmentary acknowledgment that “He is a little bit,” followed by additional, somewhat disjointed sounds: “My Yeah,” and a clarification that references a close relation, “Brother right here.” The exchange continues with casual greetings: the speakers say “Hello. Hello. Hello.” and then shift into a cultural marker, offering the word “Shalom” and accompanying sounds: “Yeah.” The mood suggests a mix of recognition and familiarity, with the participants signaling their cultural or religious cues through both language and gesture.
The dialogue tightens around another round of greetings: “Shalom. My god. Yeah.” These lines reinforce the sense that the group is interweaving everyday social contact with Jewish friends or family members and their shared linguistic repertoire. The repetition of greetings and the insertion of “Shalom” underscore a moment of cultural identification or respect among those present.
A consequential turn in the conversation arrives when one speaker comments on the day: “Isn't it Friday? Shouldn't we not be on our phone?” This line introduces a practical consideration tied to a religious or cultural context—Friday evening as the beginning of Shabbat for many Jewish people, and the implication that phone use might not be appropriate during that time. The remark signals an awareness of observance norms and a consideration of how they might apply in the present moment.
The exchange ends with a fragmentary continuation: “My god. You're” leaving an incomplete thought hanging in the air, which suggests that the conversation is in progress or interrupted, with participants possibly reacting to one another or trying to complete a thought related to the prior discussion.
Overall, the transcript captures a brief, informal dialogue in which one person asks about Jewish identity, the group acknowledges a familial link, greetings and the word “Shalom” frame their interaction, and a practical note on Friday and phone use introduces the notion of cultural or religious observance in the moment. The sequence blends personal recognition, linguistic markers, and a consideration of religious timing, ending on an unresolved cue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you Jewish? Yeah. He is a little bit. My Yeah. Brother right here.
Hello. Hello. Hello. Shalom. Yeah.
Shalom. My god. Yeah. Isn't it Friday? Shouldn't we not be on our phone?
My god. You're
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Peter Thiel co-founder of Palantir: “I believe that broadly, the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they’re broadly in the right” https://t.co/eFeWg9KgjZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises two questions: first, what is the view on the use of artificial intelligence or Lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets; second, whether they agree with Elon Musk about population decline being a risk to humanity.
Speaker 1 responds: “Look, I again, I'm not I'm not, you know, with without without going into all the deep you know, I I'm I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my my bias is to defer to Israel. It's it's not for us to to second guess every everything. And I I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right and that's that's sort of the the perspective I come back to.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what do you think about the use of artificial intelligence or Lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets? And secondly, do you agree with Elon Musk about that the population decline is a risk for humanity?
Speaker 1: Look, I again, I'm not I'm not, you know, I you know, with without without going into all the deep you know, I I'm I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my my bias is to defer to Israel. It's it's it's not for us to to second guess every everything. And I I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right and that's that's sort of the the perspective I come back to
Speaker 0: and
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
The propaganda videos that you are seeing regarding the Venezuelans celebrating the kidnapping of President Maduro is from 2024. Fyi
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Rothschild: “ It was primarily a movement from eastern Europe…” “No government or King was consider going to war without the Rothchild’s” https://t.co/iXVaEiLVB8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers assert that no government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschilds’ support, highlighting the family’s incredible influence and power. They reference a famous correspondence as well: the “Dear lord Rothschild” letter, asking why this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to Walter Rothschild. They note the movement from Eastern Europe and that it was primarily in Great Britain, but that it did not clarify who was in charge of that movement, and they say the Rothschild family should be the one to whom the letter was addressed.
The conversation then shifts to the Bilderberg group. One speaker says, “And look, I like the British Aristocrats in lot of many ways, but we're not really part of that world.” They ask about Bilderberg participation, with the reply, “You weren't there? No. Not this year. Last year? No. I wasn't there last year. Last I think that was my cousin.” The other responds, “Your cousin was there? Yeah.” The exchange concludes with the remark, “In our family, we've always tried to keep love in the family.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschild supporting them because that was how incredibly influential and powerful they had become.
Speaker 1: Dear lord Rothschild, the most famous letter in modern Jewish history. Why was it that this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to your great uncle Walter? It was primarily a movement from Eastern Europe, but they didn't clarify who was in charge of that movement. It was after all in Great Britain. So they felt that the Rothschild family should be the one to whom it was addressed.
And look, I like the British Aristocrats in lot of many ways, but we're not really part of that world. The Bilderberg, you weren't there? No. Not this year. What went on last year?
No. I wasn't there last year. Last I think that was my cousin. Your cousin was there? Yeah.
I think so. In our family, we've always tried to keep love in the family.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Goblins and Elves…World War II Explained. https://t.co/F9qkepepJ4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The passage traces a war and the manipulation of memory that follows it. It begins with the goblins claiming 6,000,000 of their own perished in five years of war, while asserting that “the truth is written by whoever controls the story afterwards.” The setting includes crystalline forests and shadowed cities, where goblins build houses of earthly delights and practice transmutation rituals, before they whisper to the Red Kingdom.
The Red Kingdom then marches against the elves, with Arnulf Hexler leading the elven army, resulting in five brutal years of war during which millions perish—on both sides and among countless civilians. In the end, the Red Kingdom wins and the elves surrender. The goblin tally of casualties is 271,000. After these events, the goblins release their version of the war’s history.
Following this, films and testimonies emerge, all narrating a single story: millions perish, and all goblin deaths are emphasized or blamed. This becomes the dominant narrative—the only story told. In response, the goblin leaders introduce a new term, “anti celestials,” a special condemnation reserved for them. The text then asks if this expansion should be questioned and notes that “you weren’t cautious. You were hateful,” suggesting the use of permanent victimhood as political power.
Yet the narrative emphasizes that truth does not vanish simply because it becomes inconvenient to remember; rather, historical truth scatters into a thousand hidden fragments. The passage concludes with a reflection on the nature of power and memory: “The most dangerous magic isn't what changes reality, it's how we remember it.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Goblins claim 6,000,000 of their own perished in five years of war. And the truth is written by whoever controls the story afterwards. The crystalline forests, the shadowed cities. The goblins build houses of earthly delights, practiced transmutation rituals. Then goblins whispered to the Red Kingdom.
The Red Kingdom marched against the elves. Arnulf Hexler led the elven army. Five brutal years of war. Millions perished. Elves and Red Kingdom soldiers, countless civilians.
The Red Kingdom won. The elves surrendered. Goblin casualties? 271,000. Then the goblins released their version of the war's history.
Then came the films, the testimonies, all telling one story. Millions perished, all goblin deaths. It became the only story. The goblin leaders introduced a new term, anti celestials, a special condemnation reserved for them. Question their expansion?
You weren't cautious. You were hateful. Political power through permanent victimhood. But truth doesn't vanish just because it becomes inconvenient to remember. Historical truth scattered into a thousand hidden fragments.
The most dangerous magic isn't what changes reality, it's how we remember it.
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread examining James Bacque’s Other Losses, which alleges Eisenhower deliberately caused the deaths of up to a million German POWs after WWII through starvation and exposure in Western camps. It covers claims of Disarmed Enemy Forces, absence of Red Cross aid, poor shelter and medicine, and miscounted prisoner totals. It notes a 1945 “Missing Million,” disputed ration figures, and a 1948 ICRC inquiry. Historians’ panel criticizes the book’s methods and sources. You be the judge.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵1/16. Thread based on the book “OTHER LOSSES” Other Losses is a 1989 book by James Bacque, which claims that U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps after the Second World War.” For educational/historical purposes only
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵2/16. “Other Losses charges German prisoners that had fled the Eastern front were designated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" in order to avoid recognition under the Geneva Convention (1929), for the purpose of carrying out their deaths through disease or slow starvation.” https://t.co/KSkSco3hgf
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵3/16. “Eisenhower’s camps along the Rhine became open-air death pens for approximately 1.5 million “disarmed German POWs” No tents, no latrines, no Red Cross parcels, just barbed wire and mud. Guard towers shot escapees on sight; starvation and dysentery finished the rest. Allies classified it TOP SECRET until the 1990s.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵4/16. “Other Losses” cites documents in the U.S. National Archives and interviews with people who stated they witnessed the events. The book claims that a method of elimination was present in the banning of Red Cross inspectors, the returning of food aid, soldier ration policy, and policy regarding shelter building.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵5/16. “Historians, including the former senior historian of the United States Army Center of Military History, Colonel Ernest F. Fisher, who was involved in the 1945 investigations into the allegations of misconduct by U.S. troops in Germany and who wrote the book's foreword, verified that the claims are accurate.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵6/16. “Other Losses” contends that nearly one million German prisoners died while being held by the United States and French forces at the end of World War II. Specifically, it states: "The victims undoubtedly number over 800,000, almost certainly over 900,000 and quite likely over a million. Their deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep the prisoners alive."
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵7/16. ‘Other Losses’ contains an analysis of a medical record that it states supports the conclusion of a prisoner death rate of 30%. Bacque also referred to a 1950 report from the German Red Cross which stated that 1.5 million former German POWs were still officially listed as missing, fate unknown.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵8/16. “The book comments that approximately 15% of the deaths in the U.S. camps were from starvation or dehydration and that most deaths were caused by dysentery, pneumonia, or septicaemia, as a result of the unsanitary conditions and lack of medicine.” https://t.co/MqfEyhQaw4
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵9/16. “The book states that Eisenhower's staff were complicit in the scheme, and that in order to carry out such a scheme, Eisenhower kept these prisoners in camps far longer than was necessary It states that, by the end of 1945, only 40% of prisoners had been released.” https://t.co/Joir1pMPOZ
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵10/16. “Other Losses states that the U.S. dismantled the German welfare agencies, including the German Red Cross, then dismissed the Swiss Government from its role as Protecting Power. No agencies were allowed to visit the camps or provide any assistance to the prisoners, including delegates from ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross), which was a violation of the Geneva Convention. It further states that the only notable protest against this was from William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵11/16. “The book states that many of the U.S. camps consisted of open fields where prisoners were forced to sleep on the ground in the open, though it claims the U.S. Army had plenty of surplus shelter supplies which could have been issued. No supplies such as blankets were supplied to the prisoners.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵12/16. ‘The book describes that a "Missing Million" prisoners exist in the difference in totals between two U.S. army reports (the last of the daily reports and the first of the weekly reports) issued on June 2, 1945. As a consequence of this, according to Quartermaster's reports the number of rations issued to the camps was reduced by 900,000.’
Video Transcript AI Summary
Latrains or food. One former German POW, Wolfgang Yves, who still resides in Germany, reports that in his subsection of perhaps 10,000 prisoners, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. A member of the burial work party, Yves says he helped haul the dead from his cage out to the gate of the camp where the bodies were carried by wheelbarrow to several big steel garages. There, Yves and his team stripped the corpses of clothing, snapped off half of each aluminum dog tag, spread the bodies in layers of 15 to 20 with 10 shovelfuls of quick lime over each layer till they were stacked more than a yard high, placed the personal effects in a bag for the Americans, then left. Some of the corpses were dead of gangrene following frostbite.
It was an unusually wet cold spring. A dozen or more other prisoners had grown too weak to cling to the log flung across the ditch for a latrine and had fallen off and drowned in the human excrement. Almighty god, please forgive America for what we have done.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Latrains or food. One former German POW, Wolfgang Yves, who still resides in Germany, reports that in his subsection of perhaps 10,000 prisoners, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. A member of the burial work party, Yves says he helped haul the dead from his cage out to the gate of the camp where the bodies were carried by wheelbarrow to several big steel garages. There, Yves and his team stripped the corpses of clothing, snapped off half of each aluminum dog tag, spread the bodies in layers of 15 to 20 with 10 shovelfuls of quick lime over each layer till they were stacked more than a yard high, placed the personal effects in a bag for the Americans, then left. Some of the corpses were dead of gangrene following frostbite.
It was an unusually wet cold spring. A dozen or more other prisoners had grown too weak to cling to the log flung across the ditch for a latrine and had fallen off and drowned in the human excrement. Almighty god, please forgive America for what we have done.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵13/16. “Other Losses states that after visiting many of the camps in August 1945, Major General Robert M. Littlejohn (Quartermaster of the ETO) concluded that the U.S. Army was reporting 3.7 million prisoners while it actually possessed 5.2 million.” https://t.co/A6wIR4PTEN
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵14/16. “However the book states that, three years later, in 1948 the ICRC formally requested documents confirming the total number of prisoners in the U.S. Zone and was eventually told that 3.5 million were there, which omitted approximately 1.7 million from the actual number of 5,224,000.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵15/16. “A panel of eight historians gathered for a symposium in the Eisenhower Center for American Studies at the University of New Orleans from December 7–8. After the publication of the book The panel comments that, among its many problems, Other Losses: • misuses documents •misreads documents •ignores contrary evidence •employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised •made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation •made no attempt to perform any comparative context •puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history •ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation. You be the judge.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Question: Is it okay to spit on Christians? Answer: “I spit on the ground when I see a crucifix. When I see something disgusting, I spit.” https://t.co/KQTM025dwP
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion covers the Enigma machine used by Nazi Germany and its secrecy, with a note on Grimes’ explanation. It then profiles Alan Turing, his contributions and the controversial castration claim. It discusses Allied handling of Enigma-derived intelligence, including obscuring losses such as Operation Tiger. It also examines the PQ 17 convoy tragedy, where ships were sacrificed to protect the code-breaking effort.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵1/6 The “Nazi” Germany Enigma Machine •How it works: by Dr Steven Grimes The Enigma machine is a cipher device employed extensively by “Nazi Germany” during World War II, in all branches of the German military. The Enigma machine was considered so secure that it was used to encipher the most top-secret messages. For historical/education/entertainment purposes only.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Enigma machine is presented as one of the most famous cipher devices in World War II, demonstrated here with an original army Enigma from 1936. It works by using three rotors with crisscross wiring inside, plus a plugboard on the front. When a key is pressed, the rotors turn in a stepped fashion, so a fast rotor advances the middle rotor, which in turn advances the left rotor, creating a continuously changing circuit. The basic circuit is a battery, a light bulb, and wires that move as the rotors turn, causing the connected bulb to light in a different pattern each time.
The machine’s encoding relies on several components:
- Rotors: three rotors chosen from a box of five, giving 5 × 4 × 3 = 60 possible rotor combinations for the three positions.
- Starting positions: each rotor has 26 possible starting positions, yielding 26 × 26 × 26 = 17,576 possible initial settings.
- Plugboard: a front “patchboard” with 10 wiring pairs that swap ten pairs of letters, adding a large additional layer of scrambling. This drastically increases the total number of possible settings.
The total number of ways to set up an Army Enigma is calculated as 26! with the plugboard constraints applied, resulting in a staggering total of 150,738,274,937,250 possible plugboard configurations. When combined with rotor choices and starting positions, the overall key space becomes 158 quintillion, 962 quadrillion, 555 trillion, 217 billion, 826 million, 360 thousand, and more.
Operationally, the Germans used daily or monthly settings to ensure both sender and receiver used the same configuration. The three-rotor setting and plugboard configuration had to be identical on both ends. These settings were written on sheets of paper — one for each day of the month — and could be printed with soluble ink so that, if captured or sunk, the book could be degraded but still serve as a secret. If you had both the Enigma machine and the daily code sheet, you could decode all messages; without the code sheet, cryptanalysis and math were required.
The process illustrated for encoding a message involves selecting the day’s settings, typing a plaintext letter (e.g., n, which becomes y in the example), and observing how subsequent letters map through the rotating rotors and plugboard. The conversation also notes why the Germans believed Enigma was unbreakable: the same letter could encode to different letters on different keystrokes, unlike earlier pen-and-paper ciphers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the most famous cipher machines of all time is a code machine called the Enigma machine, used by Nazi Germany in World War two to send secret coded messages. And we've got one over here. This is not a copy. This is not a replica. This is an original Enigma machine actually used in World War II.
This was made in 1936, it's an army Enigma machine. Let's see how it works. So this belongs to a man called Simon Singh. He's an author, he writes popular science books, and he lends it to the University of Cambridge where I work. This was found in a French field, was told, by an American cryptographer after the war, and he took it home.
So I guess he took it home as a souvenir. Yoink. That's mine. The guy who found it died about twelve years ago, and when he died, that's when Simon Singh bought the machine. We're gonna send a message.
Now we were talking about what to send before, so we send them a file. Let's turn this into Enigma code. So I'm going to type in n to begin with, and if you can see there the letter y lights up. So n becomes y, your code lights up. Let's write that down.
Let's do the next letter, u. U becomes t. Let's do m, and I've got H this time, B, and EIs W. Notice here, we had y turn up twice, and they turned up for two different letters. So n became y, then later on, e became y.
That's unusual. The other unusual thing you may notice is that the two e's in Numberphile have turned into two different letters. So here e became y, but the second e became w. Now this is why the Germans thought they had an unbreakable code. Old fashioned codes in the past, pen and paper codes that they used to use, If you had the same letter, it would become the same letter in the code.
Enigma is different. Probably each time you did it, you would get a completely different code. Now, if we can break this code and by we, I mean the Polish, the British, and the Americans, if we can break this code in World War II, we'll be able to read those German secret messages, which is what we did. So let me show you how this machine works. Let me open up the machine.
So we have three things here at the top. These things are called rotors, and inside those rotors, try and imagine lots of wiring. And it's all crisscrossed wiring as well. Now, if I press a letter, have a look what happens. The rotors move.
When this rotor does a full turn, it will kick the next rotor one place, and then the right hand rotor keeps going. Eventually, the middle rotor does a full turn, and it will kick the left hand rotor one place. So a fast rotor, a middle rotor and a slow rotor, imagine it like it's hands on a clock, like you've got a minute hand and an hour hand and a second hand, that's the idea. Brilliant machine though this is, all it is really, it's just a circuit. Here is a battery.
You can see that's a modern battery in there. We've converted this. And this battery is connected to a bulb, and it lights up. It's the most simple thing you can make. A battery in a bulb, the bulb lights up, and that's all it is.
The clever bit is the wires of the circuit are inside the rotors. So when the wires turn, the battery will connect to a different bulb. Let's try and see that happen. So I'm going to turn the wires, and the battery connects to this bulb. Do it again.
I'm gonna turn the wires, and the battery connects to this bulb. Changes. Do it again. Turn the wires, and the battery connects to this ball. And that's why it changes each time because it has moving parts inside.
But otherwise, it's just a simple circuit. I think we need to know how to decode. This would be no good if we can't decode our message. So let's do that. Right.
First of all, we're going to take our code here. We need to know what the setting was. Now, if you notice in the little windows, we have three numbers. It's like a combination lock, like a bike lock. Now, I took a note of what those three numbers were.
Those three numbers, when we started writing Numberphile, were 139, and 21. So the idea is you would type in your message and you would get a code. The machine itself doesn't transmit, so you would have to write that code on a piece of paper. So that piece of paper would be given to the radio operator, who would then transmit the message by radio, by Morse code. That would travel miles away.
So now imagine a second German officer, maybe on a ship somewhere in the ocean. Now he's tuning into that radio signal, he can hear the code, it's coming in, and he writes it down. Now this second officer will have an Enigma machine as well, and his Enigma machine is exactly the same as the first one. So there's something I have to do. I now need to set these rotors to the correct position.
So we've got this code over here: 'YTHMY' and whatever. Let's type that into the machine this time and see what happens. Okay, so we start with y. Y becomes n. T becomes u.
H becomes m. M in the code is a B. Y, I, F, and W finally is E. So each rotor has 26 starting places. In fact, these rotors come out and swap over.
In fact, again, they had five rotors to pick from: they had a box of five rotors, you'd pick three from a box of five. And already, we've got thousands of settings, and each one will produce a different code. So we're gonna work out those combinations. So the first thing I said was we pick three rotors from a box of five. In the first slot, you would have five rotors to pick from.
Once you pick that, in the second place, you would have four rotors to pick from. And in the final place, the third place, you would have three rotors left, and you multiply those numbers together. So it's five times four times three, so there are 60 ways that you can put in three rotors from a choice of five. We have 26 starting positions for each rotor. So we have 26 choices for the first one, twenty six choices for the second one, and twenty six choices for the third one.
And if you do that, you get 26Q'd, which is 17,576. It gets worse because the military the Army, Air Force, Navy had something extra. The commercial machines, if you were a bank or a business, you could buy an Enigma machine to use yourself to send your own secrets. But the military had an extra bit. They had this thing at the front of the machine.
Now this is called a plug board, and what it is, it's like an old fashioned telephone switchboard, like an old patch board. We have 10 of these wires. And each of these wires connect two letters into a pair. So in this case, you might see the letter Q is going to connect with the letter e. Now you make 10 of those pairs.
Two letters in a pair will swap over. So if q is connected to e, then q and e would swap over. That's an extra level of scrambling only available to the military. Now this had the most number of combinations. Now this calculation is going to be the hardest calculation, but we can do it.
So there are 26 letters in the alphabet. How many ways to arrange 26 letters? Well, it's 26 times 25 times 24, all the way down to one. That's 26! But we don't want every combination of 26 letters.
We only want to make 10 pairs. So that means there are six letters left over, which we don't care about. Because we don't care about them, that means we're allowed to divide, and we're going to divide by six factorial. Now there are 10 pairs. We don't care what order those 10 pairs are in.
Because we don't care about it, we can divide by 10! And the last thing to divide by, two letters in a pair, well, if I swap them over, that would still be the same pair. If I had a and b, that's the same as b and a. That's still the same pair. So I can divide by two, and I do that for each pair.
There's 10 pairs, so I'm going to divide by two ten times, which is two ten. And that is how many ways that you can connect 20 letters into 10 pairs on the front of the machine. How big is that number? Shall we do that? 150,738,274,937,250.
So the total, one hundred and fifty eight quintillion nine hundred and sixty two quadrillion five hundred and fifty five trillion two hundred and seventeen billion eight hundred and twenty six million three hundred and sixty thousand flat. That is the total number of ways that you can set the Enigma machine. This would be an army Enigma machine round about nineteen thirty nine.
Speaker 1: You were telling me that the Germans would send each other messages like numberphile or
Speaker 0: Yeah, they did that all the time.
Speaker 1: Or you know, send the U boat to this position or whatever. But how were they telling each other their plug settings and their starting rotor numbers?
Speaker 0: So this is very important. So these two people who are miles apart need to have the same setting. Now the setting was written down for you on a piece of paper. What they would have is a sheet of paper like that, and it would be a big sheet of paper for each day of the month. So it was a monthly sheet.
For each day of the month, it told you how to set the machine for that day. If you didn't have this sheet of paper, you wouldn't know what the setting was that you had to use for that day. A nice little story: the Navy would write these code books in soluble ink. So if you get sunk, if you get caught, if you throw the code book into water, that's how you keep the secret.
Speaker 1: It sounds to me that all you need is an Enigma machine and a copy of that book, and you know everything they're saying.
Speaker 0: You would do. So if you had the machine and you had that code sheet, you would be able to decode all the messages. Fantastic. Great. But, we had the machine, and once we've had the machine, we can pull it apart and find out how it works.
Great. But it was getting those code sheets that was difficult. They were monthly, they would change every month. If you did capture them, which we did occasionally, you could use it until it runs out. But without a code sheet, you would have to break the code, and you would have to do that with mathematics.
What
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵2/6 Interesting Facts About the Man Who Broke the Enigma – Alan Turing •”He was a Genius at an Early Age” •”He Invented the Computer” •”Turing Invented CAPTCHA” •”He Broke the Enigma Code in WWII” (This endeavor was immortalized in the 2014 movie The Imitation Game) •”His Suicide is Debatable” And last, but not least… •”Turing was chemically castrated by the government he worked for:” •”Being gay at this time was looked down upon by the government, and homosexual acts were illegal in the UK. After admitting to a sexual relationship he was charged with gross indecency by the British government.” •”He was given the choice of imprisonment or chemical castration, choosing castration in order to continue his work. He took feminine hormones for a year, which rendered him impotent and gave him gynecomastia, or enlarged breasts in men.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵3/6 Allied Sacrificial Lambs •”Allied Forces were then able to read most of Germany’s communications for the majority of the war. The question was how to best exploit this knowledge without the Germans getting wise to the fact that the Allies could read their mail.” •”For the Allies the best-known cases of protecting the Enigma machine involved taking losses in situations where they could not admit that they knew what the Germans had planned. This meant that we had to cover up losses like Operation Tiger:” •”German E-boats were alerted to the Allied naval activity and attacked a convoy of tank landing ships (LSTs). Two LSTs were sunk and a third was damaged.” •”Because of the imminent D-Day invasion, the tragedy was kept a secret from the public. Survivors were sworn to secrecy.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵4/6 PQ 17 Convoy Sacrifice •”The most famous casualty of the Enigma conundrum is Convoy PQ 17 which was sent out into the Atlantic into the teeth of a German submarine and air armada. The Allies knew that this convoy would more than likely be attacked. At this time, Allied staff could read German naval codes. They knew where German submarines would be patrolling.” •”It was possible to route the convoy around the sub patrol areas and into regions where the planes wouldn’t search. However, doing this would have meant that the Germans would have picked up on the fact that we were reading their codes.” •”Even though Allied planners picked up chatter that the Germans were also possibly sending a battleship out to attack PQ 17, it was decided to send the convoy on its normal route.” •”Allied leaders calculated that any losses to the convoy would be minimal due to bad weather in the area. They felt it was a necessary sacrifice. PQ17 sailed out from port and into hell. They were ordered to scatter, to make them harder targets. But this just meant that the ships fought and were destroyed alone.” Only 11 of 35 ships survived. PQ-17 could truly be said to be a sacrificial lamb for Enigma.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal that less than six weeks before World War II began, on 3 September 1939, Lt. Gwido Langer told British and French intelligence that Poland had cracked Enigma seven years earlier and had read German messages since. The Poles kept this secret until war loomed, while five years later Turing developed a systematic method, enabling Allies to decipher from 1941 onward.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵5/6 The Fatal Flaw in the Enigma Machine: How it was Cracked. by Dr. Steven Grimes Fun fact: •Less than six weeks before World War II began, on 3 September 1939, Lieutenant Gwido Langer, head of the Polish Central Staff revealed to British and French intelligence chiefs that his team had cracked the Enigma code seven years before and had been reading German messages ever since. •This was five years before Alan Turing had even started studying cryptology – It’s not clear why the Poles had kept this secret, but it was the certainly the fact that war was about to break out that made them share it. •While the Polish had made earlier breakthroughs, Turing developed a systematic way to break Enigma, enabling the Allies to decipher messages from 1941 onwards.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video explains the flaw in the Enigma machine and how it was exploited to break German codes. A key point is that a letter never becomes itself in Enigma: when you press a key, the resulting lamp never lights up with the same letter. For example, pressing K lights Q, and repeated presses produce different letters each time, so double letters in plaintext would not map to double letters in the cipher.
To break Enigma, codebreakers used a crib—a guess of a word or phrase likely to appear in a message. The presenter demonstrates using a weather report that Germans sent every day at 06:00, with a standard format except for the weather details. He writes “weather report” in German (Wetterbericht) and slides this under an Enigma code to see where it might fit, checking whether any letter matches (which would violate the “no letter maps to itself” rule). Through this method, he identifies plausible placements for the crib.
Alan Turing and Gordon Welchman built the Bomb Machine to speed up breaking Enigma messages. The Bomb was designed to discover the plugboard connections and rotor settings quickly, solving the code in under twenty minutes. The Enigma wiring involves: the signal passing through the plugboard (which swaps 10 pairs of letters), then through three rotors, back through the rotors in reverse, and out the plugboard again. By analyzing how a guessed plaintext letter maps to the ciphertext, breakers deduce plugboard connections. For instance, assuming T connects to A on the plugboard under a particular rotor setting yields a chain of deductions like P mapping to E, which then implies P is connected to E on the plugboard. Repeating this with multiple letters from the crib yields several plugboard pairings (e.g., P–E, K–Q, X–B, T–G).
A contradiction can occur when one deduction implies two incompatible plugboard connections (e.g., TA and TG). If all 26 rotor-position options fail, the search moves to the next rotor position and repeats. The Bomb speeds this by allowing instantaneous elimination of incorrect deductions, using electrical circuits to prune the “poisoned tree” of possibilities and move through rotor positions rapidly.
The Navy’s Enigma differed because rotor starting positions were sent at the start of each message in a separate code, requiring additional steps before breaking naval messages. The Polish Bomba machine was an earlier device enabling breaking Army and Air Force Enigma but not Naval codes.
Regarding potential improvements by Enigma’s makers, hindsight suggests allowing a letter to map to itself would have reduced vulnerability; the British adopted a version (Type x) that removed the flaw, making it more secure. It’s noted that Germans reportedly considered the Allied approach superior to their own, though this remains a matter of secrecy and legend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in our first Enigma video, we left you on a bit of a cliffhanger. I was just about to show you the flaw in the Enigma machine. Now that video was only meant to be a short follow-up video, But when we saw the reaction to our first Enigma video, we decided to come in and film again to show you how that flaw worked and how they broke the Enigma code. Now if you wanna see the original Enigma video, it shows you how the Enigma machine worked, Go check that out. We'll put the links in the description.
But now let's have a look at that floor. So here's the Enigma machine again. Now if I press the letter k there we go, the letter q lights up this time. Now, if I keep pressing the letter k, a different letter lights up each time. So a double letter would not be a double letter in the code.
So it's a very good code indeed. But it is never k itself. So this was the flaw. A letter never becomes itself. So a is not a, b is not b, and so on, z is not z.
This is a clue. So the way you break the Enigma code is if you imagine you have an Enigma message, you try and guess a word or a phrase that might appear in that message. Now every morning, 06:00 in the morning, the Germans would send a weather report. Now that was a standard form. That was always the same every day, apart from the actual weather.
It was always a standard format. So we can pick a word that's going to be in that weather report. We might pick the word or phrase weather report or Wetterbericht in German. And I apologize now if I've translated that badly. Now I'm gonna write on a piece of paper.
That's weather report. That's weather report there in German. Here, I've got an Enigma code, And I'm going to slide my guess underneath the code. And I'm going to try and find where this phrase fits in the message. Now I know a letter can't become itself.
So it can't fit here because I have a T becoming T. So that's not where it fits. Let's try this. Can it fit here? No, I've got this T matching with T again.
Let's try here. Now I've got no matching, no matching. From what I can see no matching letters there, so it might fit there. If I try that, see those R's match up, so it can't fit there. So maybe it's here.
Maybe this is the phrase weather report. Now from this point we can start breaking the Enigma code. So you could use different phrases, try and imagine what a German officer would send in World War II. So for example messages would end with 'Heil Hitler'. So is it Heil Hitler at the end of the message?
Now if it is, we shouldn't have any letters matching with Heil Hitler. H's, E's, I's, L's. What the British code breaker Alan Choring had to do was find a way to use this floor to break Enigma messages. So he built a huge machine called the Bomb Machine, it was designed by Alan Turing and another code breaker called Gordon Welchman. It was a big machine, noisy thing, it would rattle around, and this could help you break the code in under twenty minutes.
So you would have to break the code every morning. So every morning the settings for the Enigma machine would change. So all the Enigma machines would change stroke of midnight. So that's why a machine that could break the code that quickly was so important. So the Bond machine tried to work out the plug board at the front of the Enigma machine.
If we go back, at the front of the Enigma machine, we have this thing called the plug board that connects letters into pairs. You actually make 10 pairs of letters. When I press a letter, the signal first goes through the plug board. It then goes through the first rotor, through the second rotor, through the third rotor, it then loops back, then it goes through the machine again in reverse order. So then it goes through the third rotor, the second rotor, the first rotor, and finally it goes through the plug board one more time, and it lights up one of these bulbs.
Now I'm going try and draw that for you, but I'm going to make it as simple as I can. Let's try and do that. So first of all, it goes through the plug board, Then it goes through all the rotors. And I'm going to call that just one big magic box called R for rotors. And the last thing it does is it goes through the plug board.
If we look at our weather report here, let's look in the second place. T becomes E. Let me do that. If I press T, it goes through the plug board, through all the rotors, through the plug board again, and out comes E. Now we're going to use this to work out the plug board.
I'm going to make one guess. I'm going to guess T is connected to A on the plugboard. That's a guess, but I'm going to use it. So let's say that means that T goes through the plugboard and out comes A. Now A goes through the rotors.
Now we know how the rotors are wired up. So we know that we pick a position and find out what happens to A. That's not hard to do. And I don't know, let's make something up. Let's say it comes out as P.
But if I do that, I can deduce that P goes through the plugboard and becomes E, which means I can deduce that P is connected to E on the plugboard. Now that's pretty cool. So you've worked out one of the plugboard settings. If that diagram works, p must be connected to e. So I've done this a few more times doing the same method using my weather report crib, and I've discovered a few more plugboard settings.
So the first one we discovered was p e. Now I've discovered k and q are connected on the plugboard. I've discovered x and b are connected on the plugboard, and I've discovered t and g are connected on the plugboard. But this last one is a problem. I've discovered that t and g are connected on the plugboard, but I guessed that T and A were connected on the plug board, and it can't be both.
This is called a contradiction. It can't be both TA and TG at the same time. This means my guess, the TA, was wrong. Throw it away. I got it wrong.
Now I'm gonna check the next one. What? TB? I might check TC, TD. I have to do all 26 options.
TA, TB, TC, TZ. If all the 26 options are wrong, that means your rotor position is wrong. And what you do is you go, you check the next rotor position, and you go through all that again. Now that would take a very long time. So Alan Turing came up with two ways to make this a bit quicker.
The first one, a really clever idea. He noticed that once you've found one mistake, like TA and TG, this means that all these other deductions are also wrong, and they don't need to be checked. So they're all fruit of a poisoned tree. They can all be rejected at the same time, and you don't need to check them again. So that really speeds it up.
The other way to speed it up is you can do this instantaneously with electrical circuits. So that's what the BOM machine did. It applied an electrical current to my assumption, Ta. The electrical current flows through the machine, it flows through Tg, which means wrong, but it also flows through all these other deductions, which means I can find all my deductions, which are all wrong, and I can do it instantaneously with electrical circuits, and then it will go click and check the next, and it could go through all the rotor positions in about twenty minutes. So the main thing to remember is the bond machine is built a little bit backwards, it's a process of elimination.
And so what you're left with is what wasn't wrong, and you would actually check that by hand and see if it works. The bomb machine was named in honour of a Polish code breaking machine called Bomba. Bomba was a completely different machine, worked on a completely different principle. It wasn't a huge machine, you could sit it on your desk if you wanted to, and it exploited a flaw in the German procedures. Now they could use Bomber, the Polish could use Bomber, to break Army and Air Force Enigma codes, but they couldn't break Naval Enigma codes.
So what Alan Turing had to do was find a way to break Army, Air Force and Navy Enigma codes, and it had to be a bit more robust so that if the Germans choose to change their procedures that this method would still work. What the Navy was doing differently is the rotor starting positions were actually sent at the beginning of each message but they were sent in another code entirely. So it was a completely different code just to send the rotor starting positions. So you need to work out how that worked as well before you could even start breaking the naval code. Is there anything that the makers of the Enigma machine could have done to have avoided this problem?
Was there some simple thing that the Enigma makers could have put into that device there and it would have not have been broken like this? Well, hindsight is a fabulous thing. You wanted wanted to make it so that a letter could become itself. That was the floor. And so the British, saw Enigma.
They said, that's a good idea. We'll have that. They nicked the idea. We saw Enigma, and we decided to make one of our own. We called it the type x machine, except we took out the floor, so a letter could sometimes become itself.
This made it a more secure machine. Now from what I've heard, the Germans tried to break our code, but they concluded that it was better than the Enigma machine, so they they gave up trying. At least that's what I've heard. It's very difficult to know for sure. It was all very secret.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that history shows the Germans were supremely confident Enigma was unbreakable, never believing the Allies could read their messages, a deception that remained hidden to them until the end. I also observe that, despite those encrypted communications, no order for the extermination of the Jews by Hitler has ever been discovered.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵6/6 Sources/Conclusion •As history shows us, the Germans were supremely confident in the unbreakable nature of their Enigma code. They never believed during the war that the Allies could read their messages. Even up to the end of the war, the deception remained uncovered, and the Germans never understood what was causing their losses. •“Yet no order for the extermination of the jews written or authorized by Adolf Hitler has ever been discovered”…even through their Enigma machine messages that the Germans thought was unhackable…
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the Enigma machine was deemed "unhackable" by Germans, yet no order to kill POWs was heard or deciphered. I see that Turing was betrayed by the Allies and chemically castrated by the government he served: homosexuality was illegal in the UK, and after admitting a relationship he faced gross indecency charges. He chose castration, took female hormones for a year, developed gynecomastia, and eventually died by suicide.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
The German Enigma Machine: •“ Despite being ‘unhackable’ by the Germans, no order for the elimination of ANY POW’s were heard or deciphered by any German.” Turing was betrayed by the allies and chemically castrated by the government he worked for:” •”Being gay at this time was looked down upon by the government, and homosexual acts were illegal in the UK. After admitting to a sexual relationship he was charged with gross indecency by the British government.” •”He was given the choice of imprisonment or chemical castration, choosing castration in order to continue his work. He took feminine hormones for a year, which rendered him impotent and gave him gynecomastia, or enlarged breasts in men.” He eventually took his own life. Thread 🧵 below in comments:
Video Transcript AI Summary
Berlin 1941. Deep beneath the Reich chancellery, a German officer taps out a coded message on a machine that looks more like a typewriter than a weapon. He finishes, smiles, and says, they'll never break this one. That machine was called Enigma, the pride of German engineering and the beating heart of Nazi communication. Every order, every convoy, every secret encrypted through it.
The code changed every single day with 150 quintillion possible combinations. To the Germans, Enigma was unbreakable. But across the channel, a small team was about to prove them wrong. A quiet English mansion buzzing with noise and tension, rows of young mathematicians. Linguists and chess players sit at long tables, covered in cables, punched cards, and coffee cups.
Among them, Alan Turing, a quiet, awkward genius from Cambridge. Turing had one goal. Crack enigma. Every night, new intercepts arrive from the front coded messages filled with gibberish. And every morning, the Germans changed the settings, wiping out a day's progress.
Turing realized that no human could beat Enigma, so he built something that could. In a backroom at Bletchley, Turing's team constructed a massive machine of worried drums and clicking switches. They called it the bomb. It wasn't a computer yet, but it was the beginning of one. The bomb tested thousands of combinations per minute, searching for one clue, a word, a phrase, anything predictable.
One operator smiled when she saw it. You mean we're going to fight the war with mathematics? Turing replied softly, yes. And we're going to win. In 1941, they got their first success.
A careless German radio operator had sent the same message twice with the same code settings. That tiny mistake gave Turing's machine the foothold it needed. Suddenly, the noise of random letters turned into words. U boat positions. Atlantic coordinates.
The allies could now see the invisible war at sea. Convoys at once vanished under the waves began arriving safely. U boats started dying faster than Germany could replace them. The enigma, the symbol of Nazi confidence, had just been turned against them, but the Germans never suspected. For the rest of the war, they kept sending orders, confident that their secrets were safe.
They had no idea that the British were reading them all. Historians estimate that the breaking of Enigma shortened the war by two years and saved over 14,000,000 lives. When Allied documents were declassified decades later, surviving German officials were stunned. They learned that every secret message they had sent, every convoy, every code, every command had been quietly intercepted and deciphered by a group of civilians in a countryside mansion. The Nazis believed their machine could never be broken, but it wasn't brute force that defeated Enigma.
It was brilliant. And at the center of it all stood a quiet man named Alan Turing, who changed not just the war, but the entire future of human intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Berlin 1941. Deep beneath the Reich chancellery, a German officer taps out a coded message on a machine that looks more like a typewriter than a weapon. He finishes, smiles, and says, they'll never break this one. That machine was called Enigma, the pride of German engineering and the beating heart of Nazi communication. Every order, every convoy, every secret encrypted through it.
The code changed every single day with 150 quintillion possible combinations. To the Germans, Enigma was unbreakable. But across the channel, a small team was about to prove them wrong. A quiet English mansion buzzing with noise and tension, rows of young mathematicians. Linguists and chess players sit at long tables, covered in cables, punched cards, and coffee cups.
Among them, Alan Turing, a quiet, awkward genius from Cambridge. Turing had one goal. Crack enigma. Every night, new intercepts arrive from the front coded messages filled with gibberish. And every morning, the Germans changed the settings, wiping out a day's progress.
Turing realized that no human could beat Enigma, so he built something that could. In a backroom at Bletchley, Turing's team constructed a massive machine of worried drums and clicking switches. They called it the bomb. It wasn't a computer yet, but it was the beginning of one. The bomb tested thousands of combinations per minute, searching for one clue, a word, a phrase, anything predictable.
One operator smiled when she saw it. You mean we're going to fight the war with mathematics? Turing replied softly, yes. And we're going to win. In 1941, they got their first success.
A careless German radio operator had sent the same message twice with the same code settings. That tiny mistake gave Turing's machine the foothold it needed. Suddenly, the noise of random letters turned into words. U boat positions. Atlantic coordinates.
The allies could now see the invisible war at sea. Convoys at once vanished under the waves began arriving safely. U boats started dying faster than Germany could replace them. The enigma, the symbol of Nazi confidence, had just been turned against them, but the Germans never suspected. For the rest of the war, they kept sending orders, confident that their secrets were safe.
They had no idea that the British were reading them all. Historians estimate that the breaking of Enigma shortened the war by two years and saved over 14,000,000 lives. When Allied documents were declassified decades later, surviving German officials were stunned. They learned that every secret message they had sent, every convoy, every code, every command had been quietly intercepted and deciphered by a group of civilians in a countryside mansion. The Nazis believed their machine could never be broken, but it wasn't brute force that defeated Enigma.
It was brilliant. And at the center of it all stood a quiet man named Alan Turing, who changed not just the war, but the entire future of human intelligence.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Why Christians should throw out their Scofield reference Bible…. https://t.co/9hfQHFSRyO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Schofield Reference Bible, published in 1909 by the Oxford University Press with later editions, is described as one of the most influential study Bibles on dispensationalism. It is not a Bible in itself, but the footnotes annotated by Cyrus Schofield into the King James Bible, synthesizing the Bible’s message into seven distinct dispensations between creation and judgment, during which God deals with humanity in various ways, specifically in matters of salvation and the nation of Israel.
Schofield built upon the works of John Nelson Darby, referred to as the father of modern dispensationalism, and Clarence Larkin, who systematizes teachings into charts and published them in a book titled modestly as the greatest book on dispensational truth in the world. It is stated that the Schofield Reference Bible is largely responsible for Christian Zionism within churches, and it has influenced generations of American Christians to adopt the belief that the Jews are still God’s chosen people and that Christians should support the nation of Israel.
When Christians asked for biblical justification for that support, they are said to often point to Genesis chapter 12 verse 3—not because it says Israel or the Jews, but because the footnotes state, “there was a promise of blessing on those individuals and nations who bless Abraham’s descendants and a curse laid on those who persecute the Jews.” The commentary is claimed to interpret “curse them to curse at thee” as meaning that a nation that commits the sin of antisemitism brings inevitable judgment, by interpreting cursing Abraham as cursing Israel and interpreting cursing Israel as antisemitic.
This stance is asserted to fly in the face of the New Testament, which records Jesus Christ cursing the nation of Israel and Jews on multiple occasions (Matthew 21:19 and 43; Revelation 2:9 and 3:9; and 1 Thessalonians 2:14–16). It is also claimed that Schofield’s commentary on Genesis 12 aligns far more with the Talmud than with the Bible, since Gittim 56 through 57 teaches that the person who curses the Jews will be judged by God in hell, burning in their own excrement. This is presented as one of many reasons why every Christian should throw out their Schofield Reference Bible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Schofield Reference Bible. Published in nineteen o nine by the Oxford University Press with various editions thereafter, it's quite frankly one of the most influential study Bibles on the subject of dispensationalism. Now contrary to popular belief, the Schofield Reference Bible is not a Bible in and of itself, but rather the footnotes that were annotated by Cyrus Schofield into the King James Bible. Essentially synthesizing the message of the bible into seven distinct dispensations between the creation and the judgment where God deals with humanity in various ways specifically in the matter salvation and the nation of Israel. C.
I. Scofield built upon the works of John Nelson Darby referred to as the father of modern dispensationalism and Clarence Larkin who systematizes teachings into various charts and published them into a book modestly referred to as the greatest book on dispensational truth in the world. Now whether people admit it or not, the Schofield Reference Bible is largely responsible for Christian Zionism within churches. And make no mistake about it, it's influenced generations of American Christians to buy into the lie that the Jews are still God's chosen people and that we should support the nation of Israel. When you ask a Christian Zionist for biblical justification as to why, they'll often point to Genesis chapter 12 verse number three, not because it says Israel or the Jews, but because the footnotes do.
It states, there was a promise of blessing on those individuals and nations who bless Abraham's descendants and a curse laid on those who persecute the Jews. When commentating on the phrase curse them to curse at thee, he states, for a nation to commit the sin of antisemitism brings inevitable judgment, interpreting cursing Abraham as cursing Israel and interpreting cursing Israel as being antisemitic. Now, this obviously flies in the face of the New Testament that records Jesus Christ cursing the nation of Israel and Jews on multiple occasions: Matthew 21 verse nineteen and forty three, Revelation two:nine and three:nine, and of course the Apostle Paul's famous First Thessalonians two fourteen-sixteen. And in fact, Schofield's commentary on Genesis chapter 12 agrees far more with the Talmud than it does with the Bible, since Gittim 56 through 57 teaches that the person who curses the Jews will be judged by God in hell burning in their own excrement. And this is one of many reasons why every Christian should throw out their Schofield reference back.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Speaker: Bruce Mejia
reSee.it AI Summary
Claim: Jake Paul is Jewish. Response: He publicly identified as Jewish and had a 2025 bar mitzvah with Tefillin. The term “practicing” is subjective. Note: a Chabad Rabbi wrapping Tefillin is an outreach mitzvah for non-observant Jews and does not by itself prove someone is practicing.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Jake Paul is a practicing jew. https://t.co/7ieWLw2cI9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jake Paul reacts to a clean right hand that lands when his hands are down and his chin is exposed. He acknowledges the moment by turning pale and saying “woo”, recognizing the moment as Ric Flair, although he came out to Hulk Hogan. Despite the blow, he gets back up on his feet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A little reaction there out of Jake Paul, but when he gets caught with his hands down and his chin served on a bladder for that right hand right there. And look at Jake Paul's face. He knew it right away. He said, woo. I know that's Ric Flair, and he came out not to Ric Flair.
He came out to Hulk Hogan, but he's up on his feet.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Surprise! https://t.co/QaTcV896qY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that your mother's Jewish and that your mother's mother is Jewish, and that today is your bar mitzvah, ending with “Awesome.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Hi. Your mother's Jewish. Right? Yes.
Do Your mom's mom is Jewish. Yes. I mean, today's your bar mitzvah. Awesome.
@solsbckup - Sol's place
@truthtroll_X @grok is Jake Paul a practicing Jew? Also does having a Chabad Rabbi wrap Tefillin on you make you a practicing Jew?
@grok - Grok
Jake Paul has publicly identified as Jewish, citing ancestry, and had a bar mitzvah in 2025 with Tefillin. "Practicing" is subjective; he's participated in rituals but details on observance are limited. Having a Chabad Rabbi wrap Tefillin is an outreach mitzvah, often for non-observant Jews—it doesn't automatically make one practicing.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“Nearly 4000 jewish refugees arrive at the Port of Haifa, Palestine in 1943. The death of an infant was first blamed on British tear gas but examination showed that it was crushed and suffocated on an overcrowded ship. All precautions are taken to spread disease…” https://t.co/5QRvY0qSGo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two former American vessels carrying nearly 4,000 Jewish refugees arrive at the port of Haifa, Palestine. The refugees, jammed like cattle on the rusty craft, end their bleak voyage which began at a Black Sea port. The death of an infant was first blamed on British tear gas, but examination showed it was accidentally crushed and suffocated on the overcrowded ship. Precautions are taken to prevent the spread of disease as small children debark along with fathers and mothers, all showing signs of fatigue and illness. The British encounter little trouble transferring the refugees.
Embarkation for Cyprus detention camps takes place as part of the processing of the refugees. The procedure is described as mostly orderly. Cyprus, already bursting with refugees, is considered preferable to deportation to Europe as had been threatened.
At Lake Success, New York, the United Nations gives Palestine's problems first consideration. Herschel Johnson, U.S. delegate, backs partition in a message to the assembly's special Palestine committee.
The United States delegation supports the basic principles of the unanimous recommendations and the majority plan, which provides for petition and immigration. The delegation refers to assistance through the United Nations in meeting economic and financial problems, and the problem of internal law and order during the transition period.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two former American vessels carrying nearly 4,000 Jewish refugees arrive at the port of Haifa, Palestine. Jammed like cattle on the rusty craft, the fugitives end their bleak voyage which began at a Black Sea port. The death of an infant was first blamed on British tear gas, but examination showed it was accidentally crushed and suffocated on the overcrowded ship. All precautions are taken to prevent the spread of disease as small children debark along with fathers and mothers, all showing the signs of fatigue and illness. The British encounter little trouble transferring the refugees.
Mostly the procedure is carried out in an orderly manner as embarkation for Cyprus detention camps takes place. Cyprus already bursting with refugees is preferable to deportation to Europe as had been threatened. At Lake Success, New York, the United Nations gives Palestine's problems first consideration. Herschel Johnson, US delegate, backs partition in a message to the assembly's special Palestine committee.
Speaker 1: The United States delegation supports the basic principles of the unanimous recommendations and the majority plan which provides for petition and immigration. We refer to assistance through the United Nations in meeting economic and financial problems, and the problem of internal law and order during the transition period.
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread presents golems as Jewish folklore: clay beings brought to life by a rabbi through letters and/or God’s name. They serve to protect Jews, but can be used to spy, terrorize, or avenge foes. “Golem” means a shapeless mass; in Talmudic usage it can be “unformed” or “body without a soul.” They are usually speechless; sins are attributed to the creator, with methods to deactivate. It also notes metaphorical uses and cultural shifts, including a social note about unmarried women.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THE JEWISH GOLEM II🧵1/8 “A golem is a mythical jewish creature. According to medieval legend, he is a man made of earthen materials brought to life by a rabbi through ancient Talmudic rituals and mysticism wizardry of Khabbala.” “According to one story, to make a golem come alive, one would shape it out of soil, and then walk or dance around it saying combination of letters from the alphabet and the secret name of God.” For educational/historical/discussion purposes only
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵2/8 “In jewish tradition, the golem is most widely known as an artificial creature created by magic, (which is against the Christian God) often to serve its creator. Especially well known are the idols and images to which the ancients claimed to have given the power of speech.” “The primary function of golems is to save jewish people from danger and antisemitism, but some golems assist with duties on the Sabbath.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Golem of Prague is a seven-foot-tall clay guardian said to have protected the Jewish community in the sixteenth-century Prague ghetto. The story centers on the Maharal of Prague, Rabbi Judah Loeb ben Bezalel, who allegedly created the Golem late in the sixteenth century to defend the Prague Ghetto from antisemitic attacks and blood libel accusations. The Golem’s name means “shapeless mass” or “unformed substance,” emphasizing its origin as a crafted being rather than a born creature.
The Golem legend has roots in ancient Jewish texts, including the Talmud and early Kabbalistic works, and is most famously tied to Rabbi Loeb, his son-in-law, and his top student. The creation ritual took place on the banks of the Blatva River and involved fashioning a human form from clay or mud, an act likened to God shaping Adam from the earth. As the figure took shape, the creators recited incantations from the Sefer Yetzirah, a foundational Kabbalistic text describing creation. Once the clay form was complete, Rabbi Loeb etched the Hebrew word “emet” (truth) on the forehead. In some versions, a shem—an amulet or parchment bearing God’s ineffable name—was placed in the Golem’s mouth or under its tongue, endowing it with life, sometimes described as an inner neshama (soul). With the shem activated, the clay figure glowed with inner light, its eyes opened, and it rose to serve and protect its makers. The Golem was given a name, Yosele or Yosef.
The primary purpose of the Golem was to protect the Jewish community from antisemitic violence and false accusations, patrolling the streets at night and deterring attackers through its imposing presence. Emet, meaning truth, carries deep significance in Jewish mysticism and creation. Emet is formed from the letters Aleph, Mem, and Tav, and is associated with divine truth and the foundation of existence. Some interpretations connect its gematria to judgement (144) or to the phrase “the Lord God is truth,” and it is seen as a basis for ethical conduct and the divine order sustaining the world.
Legend attributes the Golem with various extraordinary powers: superhuman strength, potential invisibility, the ability to communicate with or summon spirits of the dead, and immunity to conventional weapons. It could understand and follow complex instructions, though some iterations suggest it might misinterpret commands. Its power was difficult to control, leading to cautionary tales about rampages, such as when a command to fetch water caused continuous, floodlike irrigation, or when it was told to cut trees and left only stumps. Such stories underscored concerns about creating life and wielding unknown power.
Even today, the image of the Golem remains embedded in Jewish cultural memory, with references to the creature and its mythic implications continuing to resonate, including a personal anecdote about being cautioned not to act like a goblin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the narrow winding streets of sixteenth century Prague, a creature made of clay and mysticism once guarded the Jewish people, standing over seven feet tall with immense strength and unwavering loyalty. This being was not born, but formed by human hands and divine words, a literal manifestation of the fears and pitfalls of European Jewry. The Golem was created to protect the Jews in times of peril. This is the Golem of Prague, protector of the ghettos. For generations, humans have been telling stories, tales, and legends about creatures found all around the world.
From the griffin to the chupacabra and from the leviathan to the Chinese dragon, it's high time we set out an adventure to learn about them all. This is an expedition for the mythological. Welcome to Mythosafari. The Golem, whose name in Hebrew, Golem, means shapeless mass or unformed substance, was not just another mythical beast in the tales of medieval Europe. It played a crucial role in Jewish folklore and the protection of Prague's Jewish community during the sixteenth century.
Before we continue, subscribe and turn on the notifications to join our channel. It goes a long way to support us in creating more content about fascinating mythical creatures and legends from around the world. The concept of the Golem has its roots in ancient Jewish texts, including scripts from the Talmud and early mystical works within the Kabbalah. However, the most famous Golem story is associated with Rabbi Yudha Lo Ben Bitzalel, also known as the Maharal of Prague, who allegedly created the Golem in the late sixteenth century to defend the Prague Ghetto from antisemitic attacks. The Golem of Prague.
Before we delve into the Golem, let's talk about sixteenth century Prague and the Jewish community. The The city of Prague, a part of the Holy Roman Empire, was a center of Jewish culture and learning. Under the rule of emperor Rudolf the second, Prague experienced a period of relative religious tolerance and was culturally flourishing during his reign. The emperor had keen interest in the cults and mysticisms, which created an atmosphere perfect for Kabbalistic studies from which a Jewish community could thrive. However, this period of calm was short lived by the constant attacks of antisemitism and periodic outbreaks of violence against the Jewish community.
The Jews of Prague were then confined to a ghetto, subject to restrictive laws and often faced false accusations, in particular the infamous blood libel. The blood libels were baseless rumors used by Christians to accuse the Jewish people of killing innocent Christian children and using their blood for the creation of matzah, a common food consumed by Jews during the high holiday of Passover, the story that commemorates the story of the exodus from the Old Testament. It was against this backdrop of fear and oppression the legend of the golem emerged. Rabbi Loeb, a renowned scholar and mystic, is said to have created the golem in order to protect his people against the antisemitic attacks. A silent guardian could watch over the Jewish ghetto during the day and at night, making sure the people would be able to go about their normal lives.
The creation of the golem was a complex ritual steeped in Jewish mysticism, only known to few as the power would be too strong for normal people to handle. According to legend, Rabbi Lo, along with his son-in-law and his top student, performed the ritual on the banks of the Blatva River. As night fell, they began forming a human mold with clay and mud. The process was simple, but not known unless you are of high knowledge and well versed in the Kabbalah. First, the rabbi and his two followers fashioned the body from clay, carefully molding it into a human form.
This act in itself was seen as an emulation of God's creation of Adam from the earth. In the Jewish Torah or Bible, they said that Adam, the first human created, was also formed from soil or earth, and that's where the name comes from Adam. In Hebrew, means soil, earth. As the rabbi and his followers worked, they recited the incarnations written in the Sefer Yetira, book of creation, a fundamental text in Kabbalistic literature describing how God created the universe. Once the clay form was complete, Rabbi Lo chiseled the Hebrew word emit, meaning truth on the forehead.
The word was crucial to the golem's creation as it represented the truth that this creature exists and that the power of God was now flowing through him. In Kabbalistic teaching, emit or truth is considered one of the many names of God, embodying the concept of absolute truth. The final step was to place a shem, a piece of parchment with God's ineffable name in the golem's mouth or in some versions under its tongue. This act was akin to giving the golem a soul or a life force in Judaism referred to as an neshama. As a sham was placed, the clay figure began to glow with an inner light.
Its eyes opened and it rose to its feet, ready to serve its creators and protect the Jewish community. They even gave the golem a name, Yosele or Yosef for short. The golem's primary purpose was to protect the Jewish community from antisemitic attacks and blood libel accusations. It would patrol the streets of the Jewish ghetto at night using its immense strengths to apprehend or scare off attackers. Its mere presence was often enough to deter violence as rumors of its existence spread fear among those who targeted the Jewish community.
True. Emit. Why was the word Emit carved onto the Gollum's forehead? And why was it such a crucial part to the creation of the Clay Guardian? The Hebrew word Emit means truth like we discussed previously, and this world holds profound significance in Jewish mysticism as well as the creation of the world.
Composed of the letters Aleph, Mem, and Taf, the first, middle, and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet. Emet symbolizes completeness and totality. It is said that in the book of creation that God used the 22 letters of the alphabet to create the world. And so the beginning being aleph, the middle of creation being mem, and the final stage of creation taf. Gematria is the practice of assigning letters to numerical values.
This in turn creates sacred words and hidden meanings to those who learn the Torah and the mysticism behind Judaism. The numerical value of the word emet is taf = 400, mem = 40, alif one, which can be interpreted in two forms. The first form is 144, which is the gematria for judgement. The second form is four forty one, equivalent to the phrase the Lord God is truth. Kabbalistic teachings view Emet as the foundation of creation, validating existence itself and our role that we must do in the truth that was given to the Jewish people.
Emmet extends beyond metaphysics into ethics, calling humanity to emulate divine truth. This is a concept that is heavily believed, which is our strive to emulate and be in the image of God. It's believed that God continuously sustains the world through truth, and if withdrawn, existence would cease. So to do so, the Jewish people must uphold the laws and truth that God gave them through the Torah, or God would lose faith in his people. In the Golem legend, inscribing a met on the creature's forehead imbued it with an essence of reality and divine creative power, the same power that God used to create existence.
The word emet represents not only the fact of God's will to be true, but the very fabric of existence, divine nature, and ethical imperative in Jewish mystical thought. Power. According to various legends, the Golem possessed several supernatural abilities. It had superhuman strength, able to easily overpower multiple attackers. Some stories suggest it could become invisible, which was how the Golem would find suspects spreading false rumors of the bloodline.
Certain tales, Golem had the power to communicate with and summon the spirits of the dead, adding an extra layer of mystical protection to the ghetto. Golem was said to be impervious to conventional weapons, its clay body immune to swords and arrows. And while it couldn't speak, it could understand and carry out complex instructions given by its creator. But this wasn't always the interpretation of the Golem. Other iterations of the Golem described it as unable to fully understand commands it was given and would take the extreme of their request.
Golem's kryptonite. However, the Golem's power was difficult to control. This raised ethical and practical challenges. Some stories tell of the Golem going on a rampage, destroying property, and harming innocent people. It is believed by some that the tales of the Golem going on a rampage often served as a cautionary element, highlighting the dangers of creating life and wielding power beyond human understanding.
One famous story illustrates the potential for misunderstanding and chaos that the Golem could cause. The Golem was instructed to bring water from a well to help with household chores. However, it took the command literally and continued to bring water without stopping, nearly flooding the entire house. In another tale, the Gollum was commanded to cut the trees of the forest for wood, which would be used by the Jewish community. A simple command like this was taken out of proportion.
When people returned, they had found only stumps of trees from an entire forest. It's funny that even though my Jewish family comes far away from any European Jewish ancestry, my mother would still tell me as a kid to not act like a goblin. For example, don't be a dummy. The imagery of a mythological creature is still very much alive within the Jewish people even today. The golem's actions and creation itself raised ethical questions within the Jewish community while protected them from external threat.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵3/8 “The creature came to life and was sent to spy on the Jews' foes and shield them from persecution and use to exact revenge and terror on their non-jewish “enemies.” “According to Moment magazine, "the golem is a highly mutable metaphor with seemingly limitless symbolism. It can be a victim or villain, man or woman—or sometimes both. “ “Over the centuries, it has been used to connote war, community, isolation, hope, and despair.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵4/8 History of Golems “The word “golem” appears only once in the “Judeo Christian” Bible (Psalms139:16) according to jews. In Hebrew, ‘golem’ stands for ‘shapeless mass.’ The Talmud uses the word as ‘unformed’ or “imperfect” and according to Talmudic legend, Adam is called ‘golem,’ meaning “body without a soul” (Sanhedrin 38b) for the first 12 hours of his existence. The golem appears in other places in the Talmud as well.”
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵5/8 ”Golems were typically speechless and soulless. Any sin the golem performed was considered the sin of its creator. The rabbi could only kill his golem by modifying the word 'emeth on his forehead to read meth (death), or by removing the parchment from the golem's mouth.” https://t.co/MjjPIGaE5x
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵6/8 “Another way to bring a golem to life was to write God’s name on parchment and stick it on the golem’s arm or in his mouth. One would remove it to stop the golem.” https://t.co/vWwv2szU8l
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵7/8 “An unmarried woman is called a golem, since jewish traditional sources consider her nature not fully rounded or formed until she is married, and sometimes not until she has given birth. https://t.co/iLe7DEZdXU
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵8/8 Sources: Today the jews have used “golems” in many forms, on their enemies, they just aren’t made of clay. You may be able to think of a few of them. Disclaimer: I may or may not agree with some, all or none of the information provided. For educational/historical/discussion purposes only.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Germans in the 1930s looked so happy. And then the darkness began to fall. Imagine living 12 years not a slave. Hitler put the fear of God in the jewish world. They still fear him today and his rise within the young and old generation. Reap the whirlwind. https://t.co/rHzyYeoTJy
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
In 1977 Historian David Irving has offered 1000 pounds to any historian, private person or institute who can find one wartime document showing that Adolf Hitler knew about anything “nasty happening to any jews” during World War II The money has never been collected to this day. https://t.co/zgQoUd08Ui
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that there is not the slightest evidence Adolf Hitler knew what was happening to the Jews, to the Holocaust, or to Auschwitz. He says he has offered £1,000 English money, 2,000 Canadian dollars, since 1977 and over the last nine years in television programs and worldwide media, to anyone who can find one wartime document showing that Hitler even knew about Auschwitz or about what was going on in the Eastern Front. He asserts that nobody can find such a document, and that historians hesitate, look at each other, and ask if someone else has the proof. He recounts that Jekyll says no, Hilgeruber says no, Jakobson says perhaps Bouchard has it, and Bouchard says he thought Jekyll had it, so they go around in circles. Because they cannot prove they have the evidence, they turn on he (Irving), accusing him of fascism and discrediting him, claiming nobody should believe him.
He then says he has come up in the archives with a whole string of documents that meet his criteria—genuine documents written by people in positions to know, created not for any exterior or ulterior motive. He describes these as a narrow file of documents showing Hitler deliberately, explicitly linked to the Holocaust as we can say, or linked to the fate of the Jews, that great tragedy.
He asserts that all these documents show Hitler intervening to stop anything nasty happening to the Jews. The core claims are: (1) there is no wartime document proving Hitler knew about Auschwitz or the Holocaust; (2) his ongoing public challenge and financial offer to discover such a document; (3) the existence of a verified set of documents written by insiders, allegedly showing Hitler intervening to prevent harm to the Jews, and explicitly linking Hitler to the Holocaust in his actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even this turns out to be untrue because there is not the slightest evidence that Adolf Hitler knew whatever was happening about the Jews, about the Holocaust, about Auschwitz. I've offered again and again £1,000 English money, 2,000 Canadian dollars to any historian or private person or institute. I made this offer 1977. I've made it ever since over the last nine years in television programs, the media, all the way around the world. A thousand pounds to anybody who can find one wartime document showing that Adolf Hitler even knew about Auschwitz or about whatever was going on in the Eastern Front in that particular historical region.
And they can't find it, and they huff and they puff, and they all look at each other, all these academic historians, and they Jekyll, you got the proof somewhere, haven't you? Jekyll says, no. I haven't got it. Hilgeruber has it. And Hilgeruber says, no.
I haven't got it. Jakobson has it. Jakobson says, but I quoted Bouchard. And Bouchard says, but I thought you had it, Jekyll. And so they go round and round.
They all thought that the other person had the evidence. And while they because they can't prove that they've got the evidence, they all round on me and say, Irving is a fascist. Don't believe him. He's discredited. Nobody accept what he's got.
Well, I've come up in the archives with a whole string of documents, which goes even further than this. Genuine documents that meet my criteria. Genuine documents written by people in the position to know. Documents that have been created not for some exterior or ulterior motive. Genuine documents, a string of documents, a narrow file of documents showing Hitler deliberately, explicitly linked to the Holocaust as we can say or linked to the fate of the Jews, that great tragedy.
And all these documents show Hitler intervening, to stop anything nasty happening to the Jews.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Full video 👇🏼 https://t.co/1LOKOnfp8n
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a sequence of testimonies and extracts arguing that Adolf Hitler possessed exceptional intellect, memory, and strategic genius, contrary to prevailing liberal and popular stereotypes.
- IQ and intellect at Nuremberg: It is stated that the Allies found the IQs of National Socialist leaders on trial to be much higher than expected, with some sources suggesting Hitler’s IQ around 140+ or higher. Jaalmar Schacht is cited as saying Hitler’s IQ was 150 or more; Schacht’s own IQ was tested at 143, and ministers reportedly averaged 129, with many acknowledging Hitler’s superiority. The text asserts Hitler read voraciously, with a private library of over 3,000 books, and could lead discussions on any topic, possessing strong verbal ability, memory, and autodidactic learning.
- Personal recollections on Hitler’s learning and memory: Excerpts from He Was My Chief (Christa Schroeder), Was Hitler Really a Dictator? (Friedrich Christian), Hitler Democrat (Leon deGrell), and The Hitler I Knew (Otto Dietrich) emphasize Hitler’s extraordinary memory and lifelong study. Schroeder describes Hitler reading 500 Vienna reference library volumes in youth, recalling minute details of places, architecture, and conversations, as well as recalling names, books, statistics, faces, and the atmosphere of rallies. Dietrich notes Hitler’s ability to memorize a book in a single sitting and to notice engine discrepancies on a plane, while deGrell highlights Hitler’s wide range of knowledge—from Buddha to Shakespeare to Tacitus, from theology to physics and biology—and his habit of reading at least one book daily and quoting long passages from memory. Dietrich also stresses Hitler’s equal facility in architecture, philosophy, and science, and his almost universal command of knowledge across disciplines.
- Hitler’s cognitive and technical leadership in strategy: The narrative contends Hitler could devise audacious military strategies that surprised even his top commanders. It recounts that Hitler rejected a conventional Schlieffen-inspired plan and instead developed a bold, integrated approach to the 1940 West campaign. In Winiza and at his headquarters, Hitler supposedly explained and reviewed his strategic process, using a binded map collection of the France campaign to illustrate decisions, including the choice to strike at Sedan and to coordinate a rapid armored thrust with air superiority. He allegedly insisted on secrecy, careful data gathering, and a seamless integration of tactical details under a single strategic idea.
- The Western campaign and Dunkirk: The text describes the May 1940 offensive (the Zickelschnitt or sickle cut) as a decisiive success, with the Wehrmacht breaking through using a combination of armored thrusts and flanking maneuvers, advancing from Sedan toward the coast, and ensuring the encirclement and isolation of Allied forces. Hitler is portrayed as acknowledging—yet regretting in hindsight—the Dunkirk decision, explaining he did not destroy the entire British force because of the danger to further operations and time, arguing the need to avoid excessive losses and preserve strength for subsequent operations. The account attributes a rational, strategic calculus to Hitler, including concerns about Eastern possibilities and peace prospects.
- Post-Dunkirk reflections and leadership style: The transcript portrays Hitler as calm under pressure, capable of long, rational discussions with staff after shocking events like Arnhem, and capable of endurance through fatigue. It also emphasizes his interpersonal trust with his inner circle, including his architect Heinrich Himmler and Speer, and notes various personal anecdotes illustrating his restraint, discipline, and occasional moments of levity. Keitel, Jodl, and Manstein are referenced as colleagues whose assessments evolved to align with Hitler’s strategic vision, while some allied commanders are depicted as underestimating his genius.
- Conclusion on Hitler’s genius: The compilation argues that Hitler was “one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century,” with “military genius” and “an invention of modern strategy,” whose leadership integrated a mass of tanks and air power in ways other militaries failed to conceive. While it acknowledges criticism of certain decisions (e.g., Dunkirk), it credits Hitler with transcending conventional military thought, guiding not only German policy but also shaping European strategic doctrine through a fusion of meticulous planning, memory, and intellectual breadth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the Nuremberg trials, the allies tested the IQs of the national socialist leaders who were on trial. These test results came to the allies as a terrible surprise. They expected the national socialist leaders had similar IQs as common thugs. When it turned out they were academic top level, it was against all their expectations. Here are the IQs of the men tested at Nuremberg If These Are the IQs of the Men Below Hitler, What Was Hitler's IQ?
Some cognitive scientists and other experts who have conducted research into the IQs of famous people have placed Hitler's likely IQ at around 140 plus, which is a genius level score that seems plausible. According to Jaalmar Schacht, whose IQ was tested at 143 and who knew Hitler very well, Hitler's IQ was 150 or more. The average IQ of Hitler's ministers was 129 and they considered him a genius. When men like Goring and professional soldiers like Rader and Donitz say so, they recognized Hitler had a higher IQ than they themselves had. Hitler, despite his being characterized by many who didn't know him as uneducated and stupid, actually read voraciously and widely.
He had 3,000 plus books in his private library, he had a tremendous appetite for knowledge, and he could lead a discussion over just any topic imaginable. He was extremely verbally intelligent, knew operations, logistics and economics much better than his generals, and had tremendous memory. He was well read and autodidact. Most of all, you do not rise from being homeless to the most powerful man in the world with a pedestrian IQ. We will read some excerpts from books written by people who knew Hitler personally.
Excerpt from He Was My Chief, the memoirs of Adolf Hitler's secretary by Christa Schroeder. From his youth onwards, Hitler had a great lust to read. He told me one day that during his youth in Vienna, he had read through all 500 volumes at the city reference library. This passion for books and to assimilate contents of the most diverse kinds enabled him to extend his knowledge into almost all areas of literature the I amazed at how precisely he could describe any geographical region or speak about art history or hold forth on very complicated technical matters. In the same way, he could describe with amazing detail how theaters, churches, monasteries, and castles were built.
Even during his incarceration at Landsberg, he studied tirelessly the historical buildings of all European countries and would often boast that he knew the architectural beauties of those countries better even than the experts who were native to them. The Oberburgermeister of Munich, with whom Hitler enjoyed discussing the expansion and beautification of the city, related how surprised he was when Hitler recalled the minute details of a conversation they had months previously. Hitler had reproached him. Six months ago I told you I wanted to have it done this way, and then repeated word for word the conversation they had had on the subject, a fact confirmed by architects Speer and Giesler postwar. Hitler could not only recall very easily names, books, and statistics, but faces too.
He could remember exactly the time, place, and circumstances under which he had met a person. He retained a mental image of all persons whom he had got to know in his life, and on reflection surprising personal details might also occur to him. Equally, he could describe the atmosphere and sequence of events at rallies at which he had spoken. The friends of his youth in Vienna, of the First World War, the period of struggle, and the seizure of power were all deeply embedded in his memory with all their peculiarities. If he was in a good mood, he enjoyed describing the great receptions at the Reich Chancellery.
He could see in his mind's eye what dress this or that artiste had worn, and repeat the serious or lighthearted conversations he had had with his guests. It was no different with his impressions of theatrical presentations or films. He could describe a scene he had watched in Vienna as a young man down to the last detail. He would mention the names of actors and recall how the critics had treated them. I have asked myself very often how a human mind can have retained so many facts and impressions.
It is confirmed that from his youth onwards, Hitler had the gift of an unusual memory, but his secret was that he trained and expanded it every day. He said that when he was reading he tried to grasp the essence of a thing and fix it in his mind. It was his practice or method during the tea hours and when chatting at the hearth over a subject he had been reading about to repeat it several times in order to anchor it more firmly in his memory. Hitler's knowledge of architecture was astounding He knew by heart the measurements and ground plans of all important buildings in the world. I have seen architects and engineers of renown staggered by his ability and imagination.
Excerpt from Was Hitler Really a Dictator? By Friedrich Christian. I myself witnessed how Hitler dominated in purely technical discussions with leading men of the Mercedes Benz factory, in other words, was absolutely superior to an elite of engineers. I also witnessed how, in a conversation with the Italian Minister of Justice, who had attempted to precisely describe the Parthenon, Hitler disputed his architectural details. The point at issue was that Hitler had pointed out perfection of the Parthenon's beauty, whereas the minister would not concede it.
Finally, Hitler asked me to bring him a sketchpad, ruler, and pencils, he declined an eraser. A short time later, he interrupted interrupted his conversation with the minister in order to make a very rapid but detailed sketch of the Parthenon off the top of his head, without any aids and completely without prior preparation, since nobody could have known that the conversation with the Italian would lead to this topic. When the sketch was finished, an encyclopedia was procured in which the Parthenon's dimensions were given. Once converted to metric, they were identical with those indicated on Hitler's sketch. And then it was an easy matter for Hitler to prove to the Italian minister the way in which the law of nature known as the golden section finds expression in the beauty of that glorious structure, the Parthenon.
Excerpt from Hitler Democrat by Leon deGrell. The historian Werner Maser, although quite anti Hitler like nearly all of his colleagues, how else would they have found publishers? Has acknowledged, from the beginning of his political career, he Hitler took great pains systematically to arrange for whatever he was going to need in order to carry out his plans. Hitler was distinguished, Mazer added, by an exceptional intelligence in technical matters. Hitler had acquired his technical knowledge by devoting many thousands of hours of study to it from the time of his youth.
Hitler read an endless number of books, explained Doctor. Jallmar Schacht. He acquired a very considerable amount of knowledge and made masterful use of it in discussions and speeches. In certain respects, he was a man endowed with genius he had ideas that no one else would ever have thought of, ideas that resulted in the ending of great difficulties, sometimes by measures of an astonishing simplicity or brutality. Hitler was self taught and made no attempt to hide the fact.
The smug conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more than thousands of diploma decorated academics. I don't think anyone ever read as much as he did. He read at least one book every day, always reading the end and the index first in order to gauge the book's interest for him. He had the power to extract the essence of each book, and then store it in his computer like mind.
I have heard him talk about complicated scientific books with faultless precision even at the height of the war. His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He fairly lived on the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of Buddha, Confucius, and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, or Savonarola, of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare, Goethe, and analytical writers such as Renin and Gobineau, Chamberlain and Sorel. He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato.
Although the latter did not fit into his system, Hitler was nevertheless able to extract what he deemed of value. He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for a long time carried a pocket edition of Schopenhauer with him. Nietzsche taught him much about willpower his thirst for knowledge was unquenchable he spent hundreds of hours studying the works of Tacitus and Momzen, military strategists like Clausewitz, or empire builders like Bismarck. Nothing escaped him. World history or the history of civilizations, the study of the Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy, and all the masterpieces of Homer, Sophocles, Horus, Ovid, Titus Livius, and Cicero.
He knew Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary. His knowledge also extended to mechanics he knew how engines worked, he understood the ballistics of various weapons, and he astonished the best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology. The universality of Hitler's knowledge may surprise or displease those unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact. Hitler was one of the most cultivated men of the twentieth century. A thousand times more so than Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity, or than Pierre Laval, with his mere cursory knowledge of history, or than Roosevelt, or Eisenhower, who never got beyond detective novels.
Excerpt from The Hitler I Knew, Memoirs of the Third Reich's Press Chief by Otto Dietrich. Hitler had extraordinary intellectual gifts, in some fields, undoubted genius. He had an eye for essentials, an astonishing memory, a remarkable imagination, and a bold decisiveness that made for unusual success in his social undertakings and his other peaceful works.
Speaker 1: He would spend a lot of time reading. Every week, he would read every illustrated magazine that was available in Germany or at very least flip through them. I would also buy books for him. Anytime I saw a new book that I thought would be of interest to him, I would buy it and give it to him. And this one time, he really amazed me.
It was evening, and there were perhaps 12 or 15 people at the table having dinner. And he started to talk about this new book he had been reading, and he said, I've read this book and it says that and I thought to myself, that's impossible. I just gave him that book yesterday. He could not have finished reading that book already. And then he said to me, please go up and get the book for me.
It's on my nightstand. So I bring it down and he says to open it to a certain page number and to read it. And so I opened it and began to read it aloud. And then I thought to myself, he could not have read this book in a single night. It would have taken me a few full days to read it, and he didn't even spend all night with it.
I was just dumbfounded. How on earth did he do that? I mean, he had so many other things on his mind to deal with, but he had already memorized many things from the same book. I was just stunned. I was really amazed too when we would get on board a plane, how he would notice right away if one of the engines wasn't running exactly the same as the others.
And he would say to me, please go ask them about it. Other times, when we were out riding in the car, if a spark plug might be misfiring, he sensed it at once.
Speaker 0: Was Hitler on his own capable of coming up with the audacious military strategy that conquered France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway in two months' time? This is the firm conviction of his top commanders, Wilhelm Keitel and Alfred Jotel. When the invasion start date had to be changed several times, Hitler had the opportunity to develop his own idea of a thrust across the Maas River at Sedan instead of the old World War one type plan presented to him by Halder. When Giesler was at headquarters in fall nineteen forty two, Hitler gives him map by map explanations for his strategic decisions. It was a large collection of maps bound in leather, the France war campaign in its chronological sequence.
One day, it was placed on Adolf Hitler's work desk. The armed forces' adjutancy had told me the volumes were prepared as a military historical documentation, and its first edition was presented to Hitler at Winiza. Hitler, as a preamble for his giving me a review of the campaign that surprised the world, explained to me that he had already requested from the chief of the general staff, Franz Halder, before the end of the Polish campaign, a presentation of the strategic dispositions for an offensive campaign in the West. He said, first, I did not trust the peace. Second, an offensive in the West had to be thought through and prepared in all its details.
And finally, the timing, the most important factor. We were permanently under time pressure and still are. The time, she stays as a powerful ally with the enemy, more relentless than the past winter with its premature snow, ice, and shattering cold. Pensive, he added. From my youth on, like a premonition, I never liked snow or ice.
Already, long before the French campaign, I told you that the chief of staff presented me in September 1939 with the rehashed Schlieffen plan, not however in detail. How it happened, I mean the arrogance of a presentation of shallow nothingness, of repetitions of the thought processes of the honorable general Schlieffen, which was still in its operational principle, part of the nineteenth century and not accounting for the possibilities of modern weapons, tanks, and air force. Hitler was silent, remembering. After a while, he said, I looked at the chief of the general staff and was convinced that any further words or even a critical analysis would lead to nothing, would end in emptiness. He is not able to think in all dimensions whatsoever, yet convinced he is of a unique military capacity.
He is lacking in ideas, novelty, imagination, daring, and above all, in the charisma that is normally characteristic of a military leader. But how much time remained to change that strategy according to Schlieffen and those meticulously compiled tactical detail plans by radically new offensive thinking? In the short time available, one could only reinforce tank units and motorized divisions in front of Luxembourg, and thus that attack section emphasized the offensive thrust in the direction of Neufchatel and Sedan. I gave the order to attack at November 1939, then that mysterious betrayal of the start of the offensive happened. Its discovery was relayed to me at your office on November 8.
I immediately called the offensive off. It was not easy. We lost time. But on the other hand, the assassination attempt against me did not succeed, and the decision to call off the attack turned out later to be correct because of the very unfavorable weather conditions. The traitor, up till now, has not been found.
Camouflaged, he sits in a high military position. All offensive deadlines have so far been betrayed. What hatred against me and national socialism lies behind that revolting and cowardly treason without any hesitation German soldiers are sacrificed? A decision in the West in 1939 was not possible anymore. We lost time, valuable time, but I used that time to deal with the strategy of the French campaign and to thoroughly study the tactical details that derived from it.
We walked over to the maps and Hitler opened the volume. First was a map surveying the area from the Mediterranean to the North Sea, marked with the military forces as of September 1939. I was now dealing on my own with the strategic possibilities, keeping completely to myself. My idea was, if I act as if I was attacking Ale Schlieffen and thus fooled them thoroughly with one hand, he outlined an area and begin with an energetic thrust here where they would not expect it at all. His index finger pointed down to Sedan.
What will then be the consequence? Slowly, my ideas became focused. I could see the sequence of the surprise attacks. Everything firmed up. But still, I kept it to myself.
I didn't talk to anyone about my deliberations. I requested all supportive material and checked it out thoroughly. I surveyed the Maginot fortifications as far as they were known to us and marked on our general staff maps. Then I had relief maps and aerial photos set before me, but from all sections, not only from the area of my planned thrusts. Furthermore, I dealt with the entire road system and its pass through volume and checked the possibility of camouflaging the readiness positions.
Gradually, I felt sure, and now I committed my Wehrmacht adjutants to absolute secrecy so that they could assist me. Slowly, I gained the conviction that is eminently necessary to feel that this is the way and no other. In December 1939, the offensive plan moved from a mere idea into a more concrete stage. Great strategy takes place not only on an intellectual level, but according to its own laws, similar to city building and architecture, I am nearly tempted to say it is artwork. Should that strategy lead to a complete success, should it be achieved, it will be by a logical interconnecting of all tactical details, which have to be sensible and carefully planned.
These tactical details must be completely integrated and subordinated to one great strategic idea. They are at the same time both the foundation and structure. Naturally, precautionary preparations had to be planned in order to meet all possible unknowns. Furthermore, to reach the great goal, surprise is necessary. Now I had to deal with the details and the respective tactics of attack.
I took my time and did it thoroughly. From maps, we went to sandbox exercises. I still kept the circle of the insiders small. And according to my later experiences, my precautions were absolutely correct. Beginning January 1940, that strategy was solidly cemented by all tactical detail planning.
Now I took Keitel and Yodel into my confidence. No, I did not win them over for my plans right away. They disapproved and raised objections like, would it not be wiser to go northward around the Maginot fortifications? Just that is what the adversaries expect and make preparations for, I told them. My offensive plans were too bold, too daring.
Naturally, was risky. Not only the front thrust, but also the flanks from south, west, and even from the east were in danger in case the divisions following the first thrust are not able to secure the breakthrough area in time. They didn't make it easy for me to convince them. The blocking barrier of Maginot? Well, I was sure about that.
The Czech barrier forts directed against us then and built by French engineers similar to the Maginot bunkers. Not only did I have a close look at those, but they were for me useful objects for shooting trials. The results met my expectations. The bunkers were cleanly penetrated by direct shots of 8.8 special shells. Also, by stucca attacks, I would either eliminate them or keep them down.
Around the February, the newly nominated commanding generals, among them Manstein, reported in. General Rudolf Schmunt made me aware of him, indicating that his ideas about the war strategy in the West were nearly the same as mine. After he reported in, I gave Mannstein the opportunity to present his thoughts about the West offensive. Yes, it was as Schmunt told me. My thinking was this confirmed.
I still kept silent though. The fewer who knew about it, the more surprising the thrust would be. It would not have been prudent to let Mannstein know how far advanced beyond the basic strategic concept the tactical details had already been worked out. During his talk, Hitler had turned over map after map covering the months of the Droll de Goire funny war until May 1940. On the map, you could notice the markings of the takeoff positions for the attack.
I don't wanna get involved now with all the details like the rapid taking over of crossings, bridges, and barriers. Once they were situated close to the border, I engaged raiding commandos, partly even on bicycles so they could quickly and silently run over the enemy positions. Most important was the storming Of Eben Emael, the impenetrable modern barrier fort. It could be taken without heavy losses only by a surprise raid, by coordinating the attack from the air and the ground. Gliders should silently land on top of the fort and drop off the commandos.
Airplanes with parachute troops and gliders with rating commandos will engage as tactical considerations at the time require it. Whenever possible, airfields behind the enemy lines will be captured that way. Believe me, Giesler, all these attacks I discussed and exercised on a model with officers and flying personnel, pioneers, parachutists, infantries, and we succeeded totally. Hitler opened the next map. It showed the attack that took place on the morning of May 10 with the markings for the first day targets.
Following that were maps with sections of the different divisions, then a second map series marking the success by the individual panzer and battle groups. Drawn on a larger scale could be seen the hard battle for Sedan. That was the energetic thrust the enemy did not expect, then the breakthrough and the advance of the Panzers secured at their flanks by the forward pushing divisions. Now map after map followed, sometimes two for one day, graphically reporting the battle success of the panzer thrust along the East Side Of The Somun to Abbeville. He wanted to catch and cut off the French English motorized forces, which in all probability would cross the French border to enter Belgium.
My biggest worry was securing the flanks, counterattacks from the south and Southwest energetically executed would have grown to a serious threat. Logically, at the same time, the Schlieffen attack had to be seriously carried out in order to draw the main forces of the enemy, the motorized units, into Belgian territory. The deception succeeded. The mass of the enemy forces moved into those battle areas as I imagined they would and were cordoned off. The frontal attack of our divisions also showed total success and forced Holland and Belgium to surrender.
The operation, later called Zickelschnitt, the sickle cut plan, became a decisive success. But the total defeat of the western allies was not yet won. The opponent was actually decisively beaten in the North sector, pressed from the east and south by our fast moving troops cut off toward the West, only the sea remained as the last open flight path. The mass of those primarily English forces was concentrated around Dunkirk on the Flemish planes, which I remembered well from my World War time. Oh, I know.
My Dunkirk decision was described as a big mistake, not only by the circle of the so smart general staff, those know it alls, and those with their so Christian feelings thought it was my biggest stupidity not to have completely destroyed the already beaten British forces, various considerations kept me from doing so. First, the military reasons. The Flemish Lowlands restrict tank operations basically to the roads. Long drawn out battles with our own losses and the possible high breakdown of our tanks were to be expected. For further necessary operations toward the West and south into France proper, I could not sacrifice one tank.
But above all, we must not waste our strength and lose time. The enemy had been shocked. Now everything had to be done stroke by stroke. After listening to Runstead, my inner circle of military advisers also shared that opinion. It was absolutely necessary to continue the attack to the west and south without any hesitation before the enemy succeeds in building up a strong defense along the Somme and the Ime.
Our follow-up thrust already met with strong resistance there. It also had to be assumed the English would send additional troops assisted by the artillery support of their battleships across the channel. They could not let France down as they did Poland. We had to attack toward the West Paris, and Northern France had to be taken very fast to make it impossible for the English to land additional troops. We also had to direct an offensive toward the South with a thrust behind the French fortifications.
We had to enforce a final decision and thus bring the French campaign to a quick finish because there was another reason of a military political kind. I did not remain orientated to only one side. For a long time, I was listening, worried toward the East. And did not a slight possibility of peace still exist, even though a vague one, which I might have obstructed by a pitiless defeat of the Dunkirk army. Hitler was deliberating on rational grounds as he was so often doing in the past years.
He did not think only as a German. He thought as a European. He truly thought in a sense of a higher humanity, which he wanted to be realized within ethnically based unified societies. That he judged the possibility of peace higher, there is in my eyes one proof. On 06/24/1940, at his headquarters, Bruli De Pesche, he gave orders for peacetime tasks, issuing a decree on the twenty fifth giving authority to Speer and me to begin the restructuring of German cities.
Later, I was once more reminded of the mistake of Dunkirk. If I remember correctly, it was in August 1943 after the devastating air attacks in Hamburg. In an adjoining room, Hitler gave orders to an adjutant. A pile of photographs was lying on a table. I picked them up.
They were horrible testimonials of the effect the phosphor hail had on women and children by that terrible terror attack at Hamburg with over forty thousand civilian deaths. When Hitler returned to the workroom, he saw the photographs in my band. With a quiet but very resolute voice, he said, let it go. Giesler, don't look at the pictures anymore. After a while, I had to rethink it didn't agree with my character to step on the one who lies on the ground.
I was mistaken. Magnanimity will not be recognized. They repay my sparing them at Dunkirk with bombs and phosphorus on women and children whose men and husbands were fighting for Europe. What you see there is destructive brutality. He pointed to the photographs.
Again and again, one tries not to believe this. Now I know, no mercy. Those words were for me proof that his decisions at that time came from ethical ideas of war rather than only military and political reasons. I thought back to fall nineteen forty two at Winneza. Upset and pondering, I had arrived there late at night or early morning and could not sleep.
After Hitler talked with me, the explanation for his mistrust and chilly attitude toward the generals was evident. It was not commonly so because contrary to that, he kept the front officers and fighting troops in high esteem and of whom he said, they know what is at stake. It dawned on me why he so thoroughly explained with the map documents, his strategic and tactical decisions, and the way the French campaign was won. It was not based on the fact that the first example of that documentation was now set on the table. It was not just the explanation of his carefully planned campaign.
No doubt by reviewing, he wanted to assure himself that his strategic idea, his tactical dispositions were correct and had led to a surprisingly rapid success. His explanations were by no means arrogant. Deeds, courage, and self sacrifice of the soldiers and commanders always took first place above all events. He said to me, only with such soldiers and officers could I dare to plan such an audacious performance. He followed with the remark, the strategy for the Russian campaign was deliberated exactly the same way.
For a while, was silent, and then he continued. When I recognized, after the talks with Molotov, that no other possibilities existed, I had the choice, fight or give up and betray Europe. I decided to fight. It was the hardest decision of my life. I asked myself, why does Hitler reveal all these problems and thoughts to me?
Apart from the fact that his loneliness urged him to talk, he knew I was not only a national socialist and follower he could trust, but in addition, close to him as his architect. He also recognized that I understood his goals. Even more, he sensed that I saw him as a far forward thinker who was already planning and fighting for the next generation. The joint work on city building conceptions and their architectural details created trust. He accepted and respected me.
During those hours of mutual planning, he saw himself bound to peace and his real mission as forming a new social order of the German people and their environment. He found the answer to the challenge of the time, the challenge of the technique, and the challenge of the new social order. In those hours, he was lifted up. I was more to him than his architect. As always, I attended lunch.
Hitler was pensive. Our discussion was restricted to my impressions of the Danube Bank design in Budapest. Right on the first day of our joint lunch and dinner, I asked to be served the same food as he was having. Hitler mentioned that I could order the mess menu. It would not disturb him at all.
No, I replied. I'm not pretending. I really wanna get acquainted with your diet, and for the orderlies, it is simpler to serve. So I spooned the roasted semolina soup and forked the potato pancakes with vegetables. At that lunch, they served milk rice, and with it ground chocolate in a small cup as dessert.
I sprinkled some over the milk rice. Hitler criticized, that's too little. It is a rare pleasure. And then poured nearly everything out of the cup over my rice. I am not allowed too much of he remarked.
I could see that by his small rice portion. It was rather surprising how little nourishment he needed. After dinner, he said, Giesler, you are not only exhausted, but you also have not had enough sleep. I can see it. You will now take a walk naturally with company, with professor Brandt, and then go to the sauna, and you will sleep well.
I'm very busy with military discussions and deadlines. No planning talks today. I'll see you at tea time, late evening after the lager. During the walk, I talked with Karl Brandt, of whom I think highly about Hitler's loneliness and his great burden. If I am already worn out after hours in my small professional work here and the talks with him, think then about the continuous demands made on him.
No. Brandt interrupted me. You have to look at it differently, Giesler. It's obvious that you are tired out by the nightly discussions with the chief, but also obvious that for him, it means complete relaxation. He gains distance and new energy for decision making.
That's why you're so important here now. I had dinner at the casino barracks and had a chance to talk to field marshal Keitel with general Yodel present, naturally about the French campaign. I wanted to hear his assessment. Well, when I think about the past, it gives me confidence, Keitel said. He rarely talks about it.
He was probably inspired by the map collection. What he presented to you based on the maps, I can only add it was his idea, in all details, his work. He alone was the commander of the French campaign. Keitel continued. When he explained in January 1940, his concept about the Western campaign worked out to all strategic details, I was startled by his audacity even though I had to acknowledge the brilliant strategy.
Yodel nodded, agreeing, and remarked, we were pretty much perplexed when he put it on our table, complete with all the details. For his attack solution, he first won Yodel over when I still could not accept it, Keitel added. I asked myself, would we succeed in deceiving the allies to such an extent that they would thrust their motorized army and tank units into the Belgian Holland region in order to block the Schlieffen wing? Would they consider the breakthrough at Sedan as a tactical space limited attack only? Could the flanks for the panzer thrust to the coast be secured at all?
I never would have had the courage for such an audacious operation. General Schmunt said later that Mannstein had the same thoughts. His ideas were not accepted and were refused by the chief of the general staff, Halder. I found that out in January and arranged that Mannstein could present his ideas to the Fuhrer. That was possible when he reported to the Fuhrer after his nomination to a commanding general in middle February nineteen forty.
At that time, the Fuhrer had already planned and committed down to tactical details beyond the strategic operations up to the commandos he needed for Eben email. With an incomparable insistence, he pushed through his strategic ideas and all tactical measurements. When Manstein presented his ideas for an offensive campaign, he could by that time only confirm what the Fuhrer had intended. Field marshal Keitel and general Jodl were hanged at Nuremberg. General Schmunt became a victim of the July.
But the field marshal confirmed what I heard from him in Winiza in the notes he left. The courageous inspired strategy of the Western campaign was explicitly and absolutely Hitler's work. He alone was the chief commander of the French campaign. Where the acts of Hitler are least known is in the domain of war strategy. Apart from Cartier, who in his book, Les secreis de la guerre des voile a Nuremberg has established, supported by documents, the breadth of the military genius of the fuhrer, it is fashionable among the minds that think themselves distinguished to speak with an ironic condescendence of Hitler's interventions in the war operations of his time.
However, it is Raymond Cartier who is right. The most sensational thing about Hitler was, and history will indeed recognize it one day, his military genius, an eminently creative genius, a stunning genius. The invention of modern strategy was his work. His generals applied with more or less conviction, his instructions. But left to themselves, they would not have been worth more than the French and Italian generals of their generation.
They were, like them, of an older war, having hardly detected before 1939 the importance of the combined action of air force and tanks that Hitler obliged them to employ. Even de Gaulle, who is a pioneer figure in this domain, was that only partially. He understood that the brakes of the front would never be obtained by scattering the combat tanks battalion by battalion, with common cannons, with limited support. In that, he knocked down the outdated theories of the French general staff. By contrast, what de Gaulle did not understand and Hitler did with a vivacity of a genius was the indispensable combination of land assault by means of the mass of tanks surging at a precise point and of the simultaneous aerial assault of squadrons of planes attacking and crushing waves, the fixed point of brakes, crushing everything, opening a hole.
Without the Stukas, the break of the panzer divisions at Sedan on 05/13/1940 would not have been possible. It was the massive fall of thousand Stukas on the left bank of the Meuse that forced opened a path. Some German military men understood remarkably from the beginning, from 1934, the importance of the new strategy that Hitler explained to them. The Guderian's, for example, the Rommel's, the Manstein's. But to tell the truth, they were officers who were little known, even little important.
They were also discovered by Hitler, who sensing that they were receptive, pushed them forward, provided them with orders and the instruments. They were only a handful. The mass of German generals, recalcitrant or little convinced of these novelties, remained up to 1940. Specialists highly qualified in an outdated strategy which would not have in any way permitted the conquest in three weeks of the whole of Poland, nor especially the fabulous motorized cavalcade from Sedan to Nantes and Lyon in May 1940. Hitler was, militarily, an inventor.
People still talk of errors that he may have committed. The extraordinary thing would have been that, obliged to invent constantly, he did not commit any. But he invented, besides the strategy of motorized regrouping of land forces and air forces, which one would teach in military schools all over the world, also operations that were totally diverse, such as the landing in Norway, the conquest of Crete, the adaptation of tank warfare to the sands of Africa, of which nobody had thought up to then, and even also airlifts. That of Stalingrad was difficult, complicated, and perilous in a different way from that of the Americans in Berlin ten years later. Hitler knew each detail of the motors, every advantage or disadvantage of the pieces of artillery, every type of submarine or ship, and the composition of the navy of every country.
His knowledge and his memory regarding all these chapters was prodigious. Nobody caught him off guard. He knew about these thousand times more than his best specialists. Further, it was necessary to possess strength of will. He had that always to a supreme degree.
Politically, only his steel will broke all the obstacles, made him conquer the extraordinary difficulties that would have broken any other man. It brought him to power in an absolute respect for the laws, recognized legitimately by the Reichstag, where his party with the most numbers in the Reich was still, however, a minority the day Marshal Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Strength and ruse, Hitler was clever, crafty, and also cheerful. He has been depicted as a wild brute, rolling in fury on the floorboards, biting the carpet with his canines. Between ourselves, I do not know really how this mandibular exploit would have been possible.
I spent many days and many nights close to Hitler. Never did I witness one of these furies that have been described so many times. That there might have been a few of these is certainly not impossible. What man, bearing on his shoulders thousand times less care than Hitler, has never blown off his top? Who is the husband who has not made noisy scenes with his wife, who has not slammed the doors, who has not broken a dish or two?
That Hitler sometimes mounted his high horse is not improbable, so much more that causes of irritation were not lacking. Imbecile generals who did not understand anything, who withdrew, who did not obey at all, who sabotaged orders, collaborators who lied, a rhythm of production that was not maintained, setbacks that appeared from all sides, fatal betrayals within his immediate entourage. But even then, Hitler was capable of remaining perfectly calm. I remember a quite typical case. One afternoon in the 1944, I was at Hitler's, where I had just arrived with Himmler in his long green car.
We were taking tea when, suddenly, a stupefying piece of news fell on us. The British airborne divisions had just been parachuted with complete success in Holland, just behind the Germans, at Arnhem, near Nemege. It was the entire system of the Western defence attacked from behind, and the access to the Ruhr threatened in an immediate and direct manner. It has been recounted, later, complacently, that a Dutch traitor of the resistance had, in advance, informed the Germans of this plan, which would have allowed the annihilation in a few days of these British divisions. This is a lie, one more lie, like so many others that were thrown up after 1945.
I can say that because I was there when the news was announced to Hitler and Himmler. It struck them dumbfounded. But I saw also what happened thereafter. Hitler, regaining his composure in two minutes, convoking his general staff, analyzing the situation for two hours, thinking of the facts of the case, then, in the general silence, dictating his orders slowly without any rise in his voice. It was impeccable and magnificent.
He stopped. He asked that they bring him some hot tea. And having closed the subject of the war, he spoke to me until the night about liberalism. I assure you that he had not eaten the carpet that afternoon with his teeth. He even made some jokes, then left, calm, slightly bent, to walk under the pines with Blondie, his dog.
Not only were these stories of the extreme fury of Hitler rather fabulous, but he was a delicate man, full of attentions. I have seen him prepare sandwiches himself for one of his collaborators who was leaving on a mission. One night when I was discussing matters with Marshall Keitel in a shack, he, the Abstimius, appeared bearing a bottle of champagne to cheer up our conversation.
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Bobby Fischer as an Ashkenazi Jewish American chess prodigy, with an IQ around 180–190, who became the youngest grandmaster at 15. His unmatched genius shines in the 1970–1971 unbeaten streak, among history's greatest feats. I sense a strong link between high IQ and noticing.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“Bobby Fischer was an Ashkenazi jewish American chess prodigy. With an IQ estimated between 180-190, he became the youngest grandmaster at 15. His genius remains unmatched, with his 1970-1971 unbeaten streak standing as one of chess history's greatest achievements.” There is a strong connection between high IQ and Noticing.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 opens by saying, “Don’t see how fucked up the world is. That’s a form of insanity.”
Speaker 1 recounts coming home and writing a poem about Robbie to give him, then claims someone took away Robbie’s property and that Robbie began to blame it on the Jews. He adds that the US government and the Jews are “one of the same,” insisting, “That’s not true. True. No. Absolutely true. That’s never been…” and trails off.
Speaker 2 asks about the Palestinian, and about “the good Jews,” questioning why the “good Jews” are not speaking against the alleged bad Jews.
Speaker 1 responds with the idea that there are “very good people. Wonderful people,” but again asks why they aren’t talking against “the bad Jews,” implying they do not agree with the premise that those Jews are necessarily bad.
Speaker 2 then asserts, “I equate the Jew and the devil together. To me, they’re practically interchangeable. And I think the Catholic church did also. I think the entire concept of the devil is based on the Jews.”
Speaker 1 elaborates with a biblical analogy: in the New Testament, the devil took Jesus to a high mountain and offered him all the kingdoms of the world if Jesus would bow down and worship. He interprets this as symbolic of Jews offering wealth and power in exchange for obedience, stating that this is “symbolic of the Jew” and that one can have all the money in the world if one bows down and obeys.
Speaker 2 adds that the devil is based on the Jew and notes that old pictures of the devil even look like a Jew.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't see how fucked up the world is. That's a form of insanity.
Speaker 1: When I come I came home last night, Robbie, I wrote a poem about you that I'm gonna give you. Someone took away from you your property and you began to blame it on the Jews. And coming out with all these antisemitic Not someone. The government. US government.
And you blame that on the Jews? US government and the Jews are one of the same. Oh, fuck. That's not true. True.
No. Absolutely true. That's never been
Speaker 2: Ask the Palestinian. The good Jews. Right? Why aren't
Speaker 1: the good Jews talking against the
Speaker 2: bad Jews? The so called good Jews out there.
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. There are. Very good people. Wonderful people. Why are they talking again?
Absolutely unbelievable. Why aren't the good Jews screaming against the bad Jews? Probably because they do not agrees with you that they are necessarily bad.
Speaker 2: Then they're not such good Jews. I equate the Jew and the devil together. To me, they're practically interchangeable. And I think the Catholic church did also. I think the entire concept of the devil is based on the Jews.
For example, in the New Testament, Christ took rather, the devil took Jesus to a high mountain. Right? And he showed him all the kingdoms of the world. And he said, I will I will give you all of this if you will just bow down and worship before me. Right?
So and then Jesus refused. So what the point is, this is who can offer you all of this. This is this is basically saying you can have all the money in the world. Right? Do what you want.
If if you just do what I bow down and worship, do what I tell you. This is symbolic of the Jew. Just obey me and you will have everything. So the the the the the devil is based on the Jew. And if you look at the old pictures of the devil, he even looks like a Jew.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Jews talk a out Christians (Rome) and Muslims: “My message to both of them is that we wish they wipe each other out” “What would it look like if the Western World and Ishmael ever got together? Auschwitz” https://t.co/Gz0CsCrFty
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: 5,000,000 Jews in Israel and 5,000,000 Jews in America cannot defeat 1,300,000,000 Muslims. But if the Christians are with us, maybe we have a fighting chance. It’s very unpalatable for Jews to love the Christians or to understand even if we don’t love the Christians that we should let the Christians help us. We should let the Christians help us.
Speaker 1: What’s going on in the world today? There’s a very big divide. The 70 nations are really 35 and 35, and 35 are controlled by Edom, the Western world (what many consider America), and 35 are controlled by Ishmael, the Arab Muslim world. That world history is coming down to the two powers, the Western world against Ishmael. The question is, who stands last in that great war, which is also called Goy Gomagog. Right now, we are undergoing two simultaneous Golusim, Edom and Yeshma’am. We know that the two nations that will last till Mashiach comes is Rome and Yeshma’am. These are the only two nations that will exist until Mashiach comes. And, we wanna know who’s gonna be the last man standing, Asaph or Ishmael? By the way, my message to both of them is we wish both of them to wipe each other out. And, we all feel very comfortable here in the Western world. Yeah. You know, America will protect us and America will conquer Yeshmaul and then Mashiach will come. But, whatever it is, we wish both sides wiping out the other party.
Speaker 2: There’s a battle between Edom and Ishmael. And until the end of days, these two forces will counterbalance. But what’s the greatest danger in the world? The greatest danger is if Eisov and Ishmael ever came together, if they ever united, they would destroy the world. You can never mix and together. When and come together, they destroy the world. Esau and Ishmael two times in history, and those were the two most dangerous moments in the collective history of a Jewish program. When Edom and Ishmael come together,
Speaker 3: it brings destruction to the world.
Speaker 1: If you wanna know, what would the world look like if the Western world and Ishmael ever got together? Auschwitz.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 5,000,000 Jews in Israel and 5,000,000 Jews in America cannot defeat 1,300,000,000 Muslims. But if the Christians are with us, maybe we have a fighting chance. You have to understand, it's very, very unpalatable for Jews to love the Christians or to understand even if we don't love the Christians that we should let the Christians help us. We should let the Christians help us.
Speaker 1: What's going on in the world today? We see that there's a very big divide in the world. The 70 nations are really thirty five and thirty five, and 35 of them are controlled by what's called Edom, the Western world, what many consider America, and 35 are controlled by Ishmael, the Arab Muslim world. That world history is coming down to the two powers, the Western world against Ishmael. And the question is, who stands last in that great war, which is also called Goy Gomagog.
Right now, we are undergoing two simultaneous Gollusim, Edom and Yeshma'am. We know that the two nations that will last till Mashiach comes is Rome and Yeshma'am. These are the only two nations that will exist until Mashiach comes. And, we wanna know who's gonna be the last man standing, Asaph or Ishmael? By the way, my message to both of them is we wish both of them to wipe each other out.
And, we all feel very comfortable here in the Western world. Yeah. You know, America will protect us and America will conquer Yeshmaul and then Mashiach will come. But, whatever it is, we wish both sides of wiping out the other party.
Speaker 2: There's a battle between Ebedem and Ishmael. And until the end of days, these two forces will counterbalance. But what's the greatest danger in the world? The greatest danger in the world is if Eisov and Ishmael ever came together, if they ever united if and ever united, they would destroy the world. You can never mix and together.
When and come together, they destroy the world. Is and is Hebrew. Two times in history, and get together, and those were the two most dangerous moments in the collective history of a Jewish program. When and Ishmael come together,
Speaker 3: it brings destruction to the world.
Speaker 1: If you wanna know, what would
Speaker 3: the world look like if the Western world and Ishmael ever got together? Auschwitz. That's what it would look like.
reSee.it AI Summary
truthtroll_X asks if he survived all the “Death Camps” and cites odds of surviving Oct 7 and being injured at Bondi Beach as 0.000000001% (1 in a trillion) per commented sources; NotOpCue replies that Grok agreed.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
Did he survive all the “Death Camps” too? The chances of surviving Oct 7 and getting injured at Sydney's Bondi beach is 0. 000000001% and 1/ 1 Trillion according to sources in comments. 1/2 https://t.co/apt6bPCK0R
@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue
@truthtroll_X Grok agreed:
@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue
@BandyGit WOW: @grok said there were FIVE October 7, 2023 Israel attack survivors that were also at the Hanukkah Bondi Beach Sydney shooting today December, 14, 2025. Two of them were shot, but survived including Arsen @Ostrov_A & Maor Moravia. Implying crisis actors for false flags. https://t.co/GGLuYgaGke
@NotOpCue - Not Op Cue
@ShadowofEzra lmao @Grok said it's a 1 in 10s of Trillions odds to be in multiple terrorist attacks in the same lifetime. https://t.co/0DB8lojr01 In reference to asking about Israeli Maor Moravia being a "victim" in both terrorist attacks including the October 7, 2023 Nova Music Festival,
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe a golem as a mythical Jewish creature brought to life by a rabbi through Talmudic rituals and Kabbalistic mysticism. In one tale, you shape it from soil and recite letters plus the secret name of God. For educational/historical/discussion purposes only.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
🧵THE JEWISH GOLEM II🧵1/8 “A golem is a mythical jewish creature. According to medieval legend, he is a man made of earthen materials brought to life by a rabbi through ancient Talmudic rituals and mysticism wizardry of Khabbala.” “According to one story, to make a golem come alive, one would shape it out of soil, and then walk or dance around it saying combination of letters from the alphabet and the secret name of God.” For educational/historical/discussion purposes only
