TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @tupacabra
reSee.it AI Summary
A user criticizes a commentator for dismissing “pizzagate,” claiming the segment ignored alleged social-media evidence on the owner’s account, including taped kids and jokes, and questions why the segment was produced. Another user responds with details about James Alefantis (owner of Comet Ping Pong) and provides an archived Instagram link, labeling it related pizzagate material.
@tupacabra - TUPACABRA
🤔 Stephen's voice cracks when he calls pizzagate a "lie"... Everything Colbert mocks in this segment turned out to have truth to it. He completely omitted the owner's instagram account showing taped up kids, babies with price tags, and pedo "jokes" throughout it. He even pushes the propaganda created by Hillary Clinton that the email leak was due to Russia. It was Seth Rich. Why was this segment even made? Who asked for this?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses the Pizzagate conspiracy, stating that it claims Hillary Clinton and her former campaign manager John Podesta ran a child sex ring at a Washington, DC pizzeria. It asserts that this is a lie. The speaker adds a satirical remark about Chuck E. Cheese robots being the only ones trapped in a pizza place, and it references a Westworld-like scenario where robots might rise up, framing it as part of the broader, unfounded fear.
The origin of the conspiracy is traced to alt-right readers who examined Clinton campaign emails hacked by Russia and published by WikiLeaks. They noticed more references to pizza and pizzerias than expected, and concluded that this signified a secret sexring. The speaker notes that “a lot of uninformed gullible people” believed the theory, providing Michael Flynn as an example of someone who amplified it. Flynn, who was Trump’s pick for national security adviser, tweeted: “new Hillary emails, money laundering, sex crimes with children, etcetera, must read,” as part of introducing or endorsing the narrative.
The transcript emphasizes that the theory spread despite lacking corroborating evidence, highlighting the role of hacked emails and sensational interpretation by alt-right figures. The speaker adds a concluding retort: “Introducing it, you decide. Okay? Then I decide a guy who spreads this bull shouldn't be in charge of national security.” This serves as a final judgment within the dialogue on the appropriateness of promoting the conspiracy in a position of national security leadership.
Key points highlighted include:
- Pizzagate claims that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta operated a child sex ring at a DC pizzeria.
- The assertion that this is a lie.
- A satirical aside about robots at Chuck E. Cheese and a Westworld reference.
- The alleged origin in hacked Clinton emails with increased pizza references found by alt-right circles, as published by WikiLeaks.
- The spread of the theory among uninformed followers, with Michael Flynn cited as a notable promoter who linked “new Hillary emails, money laundering, sex crimes with children” to read.
- A concluding stance that a promoter of this conspiracy should not hold a national security role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pizzagate. People actually believe a conspiracy theory that Hillary Clinton and her former campaign manager John Podesta ran a child sex ring at a pizzeria in DC. This is a lie. We all know the only people who are trapped in a pizza place are those robots at Chuck E. Cheese.
I've seen Westworld. One day they're gonna rise up and kill us all. Now according to the folks with the spider eggs hatching in their brains, Clinton and Podesta have a series of smuggling tunnels that connect to the basement of this pizzeria. But police refuse to investigate the basement crime scene on the flimsy excuse that the pizzeria does not have a basement. That's how deep this goes.
Ground level. So so where did this conspiracy theory start? Apparently, some alt right folks were coming through Clinton campaign emails hacked by Russia and published by WikiLeaks and noticed there seems to be more references to pizza and pizzerias than they had expected, which can only mean one thing, secret sex ring. A lot of uninformed gullible people fell for the Clinton Podesta sex ring theory. People like Trump's pick for national security adviser, Michael Flynn, who tweeted out a link writing, new Hillary emails, money laundering, sex crimes with children, etcetera, must read.
Introducing it, you decide. Okay? Then I decide a guy who spreads this bull shouldn't be in charge of national security.
@QTrashMcGill - Unkle QTrash McGill
@tupacabra Here's James Alefantis -- "Jimmy Comet," owner of Comet Ping Pong, of Pizzagate satanic ghoulishness -- archived Instagram account. Viewer beware: https://archive.ph/CiDXD
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard that Roger Avary told Joe Rogan the Eyes Wide Shut script originally centered on an elite pedophile ring, with the final scene showing Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman’s characters selling their child to the ring. He says the studio forced pedo references out, Kubrick fought back, and died before the premiere.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 THEY KILLED HIM OVER THIS!? The co-writer of Pulp Fiction reveals to Joe Rogan that the original script of EYES WIDE SHUT was about the discovery of an ELITE PEDO RING. After the studio watched a cut of the movie they demanded Kubrick remove the pedo references. Kubrick fought back and ended up dead before the premier. According to Roger Avary who has the original script the film was centered around an elite pedophile ring and the final scene in the movie was meant to depict Tom Cruise and Nicole's characters selling their child to the ring.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss aspects of Stanley Kubrick and his film Eyes Wide Shut. Speaker 0 notes that Kubrick’s films are very different and that he was a “weird guy” who did complex mathematics in his spare time, mentioning that they pulled a script from Eyes Wide Shut.
Speaker 1 explains they had a script from set and over the weekend realized it is missing a narration, specifically a third-person narration that was originally in the movie. The missing narration is attributed to the film being recut and changed after Kubrick’s death. They acknowledge that the party line is that the film was finished after his death, but Speaker 1 believes notes and inserts were changed, and that a narration is indeed missing. The missing narration is said to be present in a scene where the protagonist sees a dead prostitute at the morgue, leaning over her, which would have required narration.
Speaker 1 states that instead of the narration, the film relies on other elements because Kubrick hadn’t had the recording of the narrator, suggesting they “clutched it together.” They claim there is an entire thread in the film that was “squashed.” This thread involves two men who are throughout the movie in the background and reappear in the final shots of the film. In the final scene at the toy store, when Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman’s characters are looking at a Rosemary’s Baby bassinet, these two men are seen with their eyes on their daughter, implying they have given their daughter to a pedo cult, according to Speaker 1’s interpretation.
Speaker 1 adds that during an England screening, there were reports from people outside the theater who could hear inside the theater Kubrick yelling at the executives, saying, “it’s my movie. You can’t cut it. You can’t fucking cut my film.” A big argument is described as occurring, and Speaker 1 notes that Kubrick died four days later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, his films are so different. And he was a weird guy too. He did, like, complex mathematics in his spare time. I just pulled my script from Eyes Wide Shut. I had
Speaker 1: a script that was from set, and I was reading it over the weekend. And I saw that it has this I mean, I've known this for a long time, but I started really thinking about it over the weekend. It's missing a narration. It's missing a third person narration that was originally in in the movie. That's because the movie was recut and and changed after his death.
And and they'll and they will deny it. But as a student of Kubrick, I'm watching the movie and I'm like, well, Kubrick wouldn't do that. Kubrick wouldn't do that either. Kubrick would have trimmed this scene.
Speaker 0: I didn't know they recut it after his death. Okay.
Speaker 1: So apparently think they finished it. Well, that's the that's the party line. That's our party line, but I think that they changed the the notes, the close the the inserts of the notes. I think those are changed. It's missing a narration.
It's definitely missing a narration. You know, a third person narration. Like that scene where he sees the the prostitute who's died. He's at the morgue and he's looking at her and he's like leaning over her. It's a bed for narration.
There's this whole thing. What they do instead because they couldn't say that Kubrick finished the movie because they hadn't done the recording of the narrator yet. And so maybe they just kinda clutched it together, except there's an entire thread that's kind of been Squashed. Squashed in that film. And that's the the two men that are throughout the movie that are constantly in the background of the film who eventually, in the final shots of the film, you see, like, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman in that final scene in the toy store when she's looking at the Rosemary's baby bassinet, which is totally Kubrick saying something.
And they never take their eyes off their daughter until the moment they take their eyes off and the final line of the movie is coming up, you see those two guys walking off with the daughter. They're taking her away. They've given their daughter to the pedo cult. That's what's happened at the end of the movie. And there's an incident where when they first screened the movie in England, people who were outside apparent this is
Speaker 0: all secondhand,
Speaker 1: by the way. There are people who were outside of the theater who could hear inside of the theater Kubrick yelling at all the executives and saying, it's my movie. You can't cut it. You can't fucking cut my film. Blah blah blah blah.
Big argument going on. Then he dies like four days later. Oh, jeez.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned from a recent conversation between Joe Rogan and Roger Avary that the original script of EYES WIDE SHUT focused on an elite pedophile ring. After the studio viewed a cut of the film, they pressured Kubrick to remove these references. Kubrick resisted, but tragically passed away before the film's premiere. Avary, who possesses the original script, revealed that the final scene was intended to show Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman's characters involved in selling their child to this ring.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 THEY KILLED HIM OVER THIS!? The co-writer of Pulp Fiction reveals to Joe Rogan that the original script of EYES WIDE SHUT was about the discovery of an ELITE PEDO RING. 🤯 After the studio watched a cut of the movie they demanded Kubrick remove the pedo references. Kubrick fought back and ended up dead before the premier. According to Roger Avary who has the original script the film was centered around an elite pedophile ring and the final scene in the movie was meant to depict Tom Cruise and Nicole's characters selling their child to the ring.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that 'it's missing a narration. It's missing a third person narration that was originally in the movie' because the film was recut after his death, and 'they will deny it.' As a Kubrick student, he believes 'Kubrick wouldn't do that' and that Kubrick 'would have trimmed this scene.' He notes the film is 'missing a narration,' especially in the morgue scene with the dead prostitute. He says an entire thread has been 'squashed'—the two men who are in the background and later, in the final shot, you see Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman in the toy store scene when she's looking at the Rosemary's baby bassinet; they're taking her away, they've given their daughter to the pedo cult. At England screenings, people outside heard Kubrick yelling inside: 'it's my movie. You can't cut it. You can't fucking cut my film.' He dies four days later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, his films are so different. And he was a weird guy too. He did, like, complex mathematics in his spare time. I just pulled my script from Eyes Wide Shut. I had
Speaker 1: a script that was from set, and I was reading it over the weekend. And I saw that it has this I mean, I've known this for a long time, but I started really thinking about it over the weekend. It's missing a narration. It's missing a third person narration that was originally in in the movie. That's because the movie was recut and and changed after his death.
And and they'll and they will deny it. But as a student of Kubrick, I'm watching the movie and I'm like, well, Kubrick wouldn't do that. Kubrick wouldn't do that either. Kubrick would have trimmed this scene.
Speaker 0: I didn't know they recut it after his death. Okay.
Speaker 1: So apparently think they finished it. Well, that's the that's the party line. That's our party line, but I think that they changed the the notes, the close the the inserts of the notes. I think those are changed. It's missing a narration.
It's definitely missing a narration. You know, a third person narration. Like that scene where he sees the the prostitute who's died. He's at the morgue and he's looking at her and he's like leaning over her. It's a bed for narration.
There's this whole thing. What they do instead because they couldn't say that Kubrick finished the movie because they hadn't done the recording of the narrator yet. And so maybe they just kinda clutched it together, except there's an entire thread that's kind of been Squashed. Squashed in that film. And that's the the two men that are throughout the movie that are constantly in the background of the film who eventually, in the final shots of the film, you see, like, Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman in that final scene in the toy store when she's looking at the Rosemary's baby bassinet, which is totally Kubrick saying something.
And they never take their eyes off their daughter until the moment they take their eyes off and the final line of the movie is coming up, you see those two guys walking off with the daughter. They're taking her away. They've given their daughter to the pedo cult. That's what's happened at the end of the movie. And there's an incident where when they first screened the movie in England, people who were outside apparent this is
Speaker 0: all secondhand,
Speaker 1: by the way. There are people who were outside of the theater who could hear inside of the theater Kubrick yelling at all the executives and saying, it's my movie. You can't cut it. You can't fucking cut my film. Blah blah blah blah.
Big argument going on. Then he dies like four days later. Oh, jeez.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm scared of the family in the red hoodie from Eyes Wide Shut. I recently learned from the film's cameraman that the theatrical release was vastly different from what he shot. After working with Kubrick for four years, he revealed that none of his footage made it into the final cut. This aligns with various insider stories suggesting the original film was about an elite pedo ring, leading to conflicts between Kubrick and the studio. Tragically, Kubrick passed away before the film's release, and the studio made significant edits before the premiere.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 "I'm scared of the family with the red hoodie in the big house in Eyes Wide Shut." 👀 Holy Shit... Eyes Wide Shut camera man told Professor Simon that the theatrical release of the film was NOTHING like the film he shot. He worked with Kubrick for 4 years and NONE of that footage is in the final draft. This is one of many insider stories that seem to confirm the original film EWS was actually about an elite pedo ring. The studio and Kubrick allegedly fought over the film after having seen an edit. Kubrick died before the film was released and the studio reedited it significantly before the premier.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is scared of people who believe in something, referencing a family in a large house. The speaker knows Stanley Kubrick's cameraman, who claimed he worked on "Eyes Wide Shut" for four years in New York, but none of his footage was used in the final film. According to the cameraman, the studio cobbled together a "bizarre nonstory" with Nicole Kidman. The speaker attempted to contact the film's editor through a Hollywood agent to learn about the original film, but was rebuffed. The speaker believes there is more to the film than what is apparent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I'm scared of the people who believe it. I'm scared of the family Oh, okay. With the red hoodie who's who live in a large house in in eyes wide shot. I also happen to know Stanley Kubrick's cameraman, and I and he said the base I used to work with him.
He was a he did he was a freelance camera. I worked a lot on very high end stuff on drama at the BBC, and he got this job for four years with Stanley Kubrick. And we used to drink and in the bar. And he's when the film came out, I said, wow. It looks amazing.
Your work is incredible. He said, it's not in the film. I said, how do you mean? He said, well, I was in New York the entire time, and I shot for four years. None of it's in the film.
All they put in the film was Nicole Kidman and and what's his name? And the studio just cobbled together a a bizarre nonstory stuff. That's not what the film was about, he said. So and I've tried to speak to the original film editor who well, I don't know who the original original film editor was, but I've tried to speak through the Hollywood agent to the studio film editor as edit I'm a film editor editor to editor to ask him what was the original film like, and what did you do with the studio? And I got into their his agent basically told me to bugger off.
I mean, and he never got in touch with me, and I know who he is quite well. So I don't know. I think there's more to that film than meets the eye.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
I can't unsee this. https://t.co/L2oICKUGuk
Video Transcript AI Summary
To combat alleged misinformation, the censorship industrial complex used counterterrorism and intelligence tactics, including psychological operations, to shape domestic opinion. The speaker, a counterterrorism and counter espionage expert, was asked in 2008 to apply these same skill sets to the UFO community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To combat alleged misinformation, the censorship industrial complex used counterterrorism and intelligence tactics developed abroad including psychological operations and repurposed them to shape domestic opinion and thought. I'm a counterterrorism and counter espionage guy. I don't do counterintelligence, counterinsurgencies. That's what I do. And it just so happens that in 02/2008, I was asked to apply those same skill sets into the UFO community.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 Are ALIENS actually ANGELS & DEMONS? 👽 Joe Rogan should have watched this documentary before interviewing Hal Puthoff. The hidden religion within UFOlogy: Rosicrucianism. https://t.co/ERojAPruP3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion explores the idea that UFOs and extraterrestrial phenomena may be linked to spiritual concepts like angels and demons. Some believe these entities are not physical beings but spiritual beings taking physical form, as described in various religions and creation myths.
Theories suggest UFOs could be controlled biological robots or "avatars" sent by higher intelligences, presenting themselves in ways humans can understand, such as spirits, gods, or technology. This perspective aligns with the Rosicrucian tradition, a mystical Christian offshoot, which studies angels, fallen angels, and the influence of spiritual hierarchies on human consciousness.
Carl Jung's archetypes and the concept of dreams are also used to interpret the UFO phenomenon, suggesting that UFOs may be manipulating our subconscious mind or that we are projecting images ourselves. These ideas propose that religions have been part of this process, with higher spiritual beings influencing our culture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been talking to a lot of people over the last few months that think that aliens are angels.
Speaker 1: The angels and demons of the bible are real. They are the extraterrestrial time travelers.
Speaker 2: And the government has known that for a long time, possibly going back to the nineteen thirties at least.
Speaker 1: Since 1930, they have known that this plane exists.
Speaker 3: We don't have souls, it's just the other way around. A soul has us.
Speaker 1: But why won't they tell the American people?
Speaker 3: You have spiritual beings that don't understand or really care for the physical world.
Speaker 1: A dreadful looking plane in the sky, a half a mile by a half a mile. Built like the universe itself, it's circular and it holds within it 1,500 little wheel like planes.
Speaker 4: Whether you're following UFO news daily, weekly, monthly, or not at all, you're still seeing it a lot. It's coming up more than ever before and from places you'd never expect. And as the noise increases, so have the theories about what UFOs actually are. And people are falling within one of two main camps right now, aliens or angels.
Speaker 5: So is there evidence of angels and aliens being one of the same?
Speaker 4: Are these things physical beings with a body and a species and possibly a home planet? Or, as some of the leading minds in the UFO inner circles are proposing, these things are actually angels and demons, spiritual beings without bodies. So how could a seemingly obvious sci fi plot have to compete with a religious concept like this? I mean, with few exceptions in p r moments, the theologians have always avoided the e t topic, Or at least, that's what most of us thought.
Speaker 0: Angels and devils, and that's like what when you're hearing about like all those stories in the Bible about fallen angels and devils, these people think that they were referring to aliens.
Speaker 4: One of the most mainstream figures who's joined the debate is Tucker Carlson. Tucker isn't someone you'd call a true believer of the official UFO narrative. In fact, he's poked holes in it several times. But the interesting thing about Carlson to me is that he's a very well informed person who talks to a lot of different people and has come to some very interesting conclusions based on those conversations and his own world view.
Speaker 1: You had mentioned several times that you think that the UFO, UAP type phenomena stuff is all spiritual.
Speaker 6: Am I correct?
Speaker 2: I I don't and I don't I mean, I should just state about every topic, like, don't know shit. Nobody knows shit. I'm satisfied that I know enough and I don't really wanna know that much more because what I think I know is, you know, this doesn't help me at all to know that. So that's a conclusion I've reached. I'm usually pretty curious.
I've stopped being curious about this because I don't want to know anymore. But
Speaker 1: You you truly don't want to know anymore about I
Speaker 2: think I know. I think I know what's up.
Speaker 1: Can you articulate it?
Speaker 2: Well, think it's I think it's a you know, I think it's a really old story. You know, I think it's a really old story. So that's what I think.
Speaker 1: What is it?
Speaker 2: One thing that you notice about all, every world religion I'm familiar with, I'm interested in that topic, there are commonalities between religions. You know, Jesus is unique and I believe in Jesus, so But there are commonalities that are very striking between all world religions I'm aware of and all creation myths. And one of them, and this is of course true for Christianity, very true, is that the belief that supernatural beings take physical form. They all believe that, the Greek myths, Jesus, most famously. But that they take physical form, that they're not just like some ethereal, they're not just shadows floating around, specters, fog, that they're physical.
Like, they're as real as the arm of your chair and and that they reproduce with people. Again, Christianity believes that. Jesus. Immaculate conception. Spirit reproduces with human woman.
If every culture in the world that we know about is left any kind of written or physical record is reaching the same conclusions about something, maybe there's something there. Mhmm. And maybe it's not so crazy to think that what everyone else has always thought since the beginning of time, which that there is this combination in cases of human beings and the spiritual realm, whatever that is. I can speak about it with no precision at all because I don't understand the specifics of it, but I know that it has been written about since people have been writing.
Speaker 4: One of the few people we know Tucker has actually spoken to about UFOs is Doctor. Gary Nolan. Nolan is part of the Invisible College, a Rosicrucian offshoot of academia that has been investigating the UFO phenomenon for decades. But we'll get into that later. In 2023, Tucker had Nolan on his show where they discussed the topic in detail.
Here Gary explains what he believes UFOs and aliens are.
Speaker 7: I mean look, if you're an intelligence, are you gonna go down on a planet with a bunch of angry monkeys who might kill you? No. Unlikely. You'll send some intermediary. Well, what kind of intermediary are you gonna send?
You're gonna send something that maybe almost looks like them, but isn't them. So I think, and this is again from inside the intelligence community, most of what we think we're seeing are avatars, biological robots that are basically put there to be the minions, if you will.
Speaker 2: And that's that's the current view of the intel community?
Speaker 7: That a it is a hypothesis.
Speaker 4: What could possibly be controlling these biological machines that were built specifically to interact with us? To answer this question, I only had to look at other interviews Gary Nolan has done, like this one from 2022 on the Lex Fridman podcast. Again, the language Gary uses is very important here.
Speaker 7: How would you, as a higher intelligence, represent yourself to a lesser intelligence? Well, let's go back to pre civilization. Maybe you show yourself as the spirits in the forest, and you give messages through that. Once you get a little bit more civilized, then you show yourself as the gods, And then you're god. Well, we don't believe in god anymore necessarily.
Not everybody does. So what do we believe in? We believe in technology. So you show yourself as a form of technology. Right?
But the common thread is you're not alone, and there's something else here with you and there's something that's, as you said, watching you and at least watching over your shoulder. But I I I think that like any good parent, you don't tell your student everything. You make them learn and learning requires mistakes because if you tell them everything, then they get lazy.
Speaker 4: Keep in mind, this is one of the leading academics on the UFO topic in the world. Yet he's explaining the UFO phenomenon using terminology that is interchangeable with how someone would describe a guardian angel. The picture becomes even more complete with this clip from the twenty twenty three SALT conference.
Speaker 1: What do you, Gary, doctor Nolan? You have to speculate. What do you think it is? Let's be bold.
Speaker 7: I think it is an advanced form of intelligence, something that we don't understand that is using some kind of intermediaries. You know, it's not that they walk amongst us that, you know, you, you know, wearing a skin suit are actually the alien. Right? No. You're gonna basically put something there that is I think of it as an intelligence test.
Can you see what's in front of you for what it really is? Can you see the anomalous data point that is there that you realize what it is? I mean, when the South American native tribes first saw the Spanish ships coming across the horizon, they didn't realize what it was. They couldn't see it for what it was. So, you just need to show yourself to enough to acculturate.
Yeah. Now, if you've been around for a long time and this is what something that I do think is going on, they've been around for a long time, they are affecting our culture. Right? It's actually often thought that many of the religions that we think of as the most important have been part of this process.
Speaker 6: Doctor. Jacques Vallee, international authority on the UFO experience. The first thing I like to dispel is a frequent misconception that UFOs are limited to this country. Very often people ask me, how come I never hear about UFOs in other parts of the world? How come we only hear about UFOs in America?
Well, UFOs are not an American phenomenon. They are a worldwide phenomenon. That's one of their most dramatic characteristics. The first major wave of sightings, and sightings tend to come in very intense series over a couple of months over a given region of the world. The first such major wave occurred over Scandinavia in 1946.
Speaker 4: Arguably the most famous ufologist in the world living today is doctor Jacques Vallee. Vallee has been involved in ufology longer than I've been alive. In fact, he was featured as a character in the Steven Spielberg film Close Encounters of the Third Kind. And he wasn't the only one featured. Although an actor played Jacques Vallee in the film because of scheduling conflicts, his friend and fellow Rosicrucian, J.
Allen Hynek, was featured in the film as a cameo. Doctor J. Allen Hynek's origin with UFOs goes all the way back to 1952, where as an astronomer he served as the scientific advisor for Project Blue Book, a study of UFOs conducted by the US Air Force from 1952 to 1969.
Speaker 5: Jacques Vallee is just one of these people, right, that you come across his work and he's fascinating. So I thought it was strange that not only was he a person who was, you know, pre engineered ARPANET. Right? He was on ARPANET, which is pre Internet. He's creating that at the same time as being obsessed with UFOs and doing you know, being a ufologist.
Speaker 0: Another thing that was really fascinating about your book was you're talking about how much religion he studied.
Speaker 5: Yes. Yes. That was really interesting. So in the book, what I do is I uncover not just him, but Alan Heineck. They were friends.
And they were both Rosicrucians, which is a a form of he might not like me to say this, but it's a form of mystical Christianity in a sense, but a lot of Rosicrucians don't view their roots as Christian. They they look at it as Egyptian, and both of them believe in this kind of life, this meditating and things like that. And so I included references. Everything I say in my books, by the way, I pass to the person that I'm writing a chapter about. So everything that I said about Jacques, I gave it to him beforehand, I said, are you okay with me saying this publicly?
And so it passed all the the tests. Mhmm. And I also talk about going to his apartment and seeing his library, which is an amazing library. And he has stained glass from Chartres Cathedral. And Chartres Cathedral is a special place for Rosicrucians, like a special place of presence of the sacred.
So and he actually did those himself. So he learned how to do stained glass from people at Chartres, by the way. And yeah. Just amazing. And he had a lot of books on angels and and fallen angels in that library.
Like, almost like it it was almost like going into the Vatican archive, going into this place because these looked like first editions or close. So, you know, really, really old books about this topic. Fallen angels. Yeah. I was pretty shocked when I had when I went.
I was we were going to have lunch and talk about the crash site and maybe talk about, you know, what I learned from Tyler and that kind of thing.
Speaker 1: And we went to lunch and then he said, do you
Speaker 5: wanna see the library? And I was like, yes, of course. So I saw the handwritten documents from Project Blue Book and that was just going into the library. That wasn't actually in the library. Then when we got in there, I noticed a big bookcases of these books, and of course, I was drawn to them.
And he said, he picked out one, and he opened it, and it was about angels. He said this is a book about angels. And I could see that. And I was looking at it. I said, wow.
And then I looked at the other bookshelf and that bookshelf was just as impressive. And then it was about fallen angels. He said, oh, this one's fallen angels and then he made a joke and he said, you can't have one without the other.
Speaker 3: The Rosicrucian tradition really only broke the surface in human history in the sixteen hundreds. The first Rosocrucian documents appeared in the sixteen hundreds, with texts like Fama fraternitatis in sixteen o four in Germany. Now, when these Rosocrucian texts first became available, one of the things that they emphasized in these texts was that the Rosicrucian, organization wasn't connected to any one authoritative teacher and it wasn't connected to any particular type of control structure. There was no institution for it. It was really a very free and independent path of modern initiation.
Now, the challenge of explaining some of the more obscure aspects of Rosicrucian spiritual initiation is that some of the practices really don't make a lot of sense until you understand the context that they're within. So, have to present a little bit of the Rosicrucian view of the context of all created life and for the evolution of the human being. So, it all begins understanding the whole set of processes by understanding where everything comes from. So, starting from these differentiated thought forms in the mind of God at a very high level, those thought forms have within them specific patterns. The pattern of what will later become something that crystallizes into the physical world, or the nature of a spiritual being, or a spiritual process of some type.
So as the thoughts from the mind of God move down and we have the manifested beings, in the classical western tradition there is understood to be nine different ranks of angelic beings. These different beings are of different levels of maturity, have different levels of the expansion of their consciousness, and different possibilities for action. They invisibly guide and affect our consciousness and life every minute of every day, but we don't perceive it. Just as we don't normally have organs to perceive non physical realities until they're developed. In classical texts, they describe the spiritual hierarchies.
They describe the angelic beings in very specific ways. Their names actually mean particular things. So, you look at the names of the archangels, Raphael means God heals. The name Micha El means who is as God. So, different beings, their names actually mean something.
The angels are sometimes referred to as God's messengers and it was understood that we had to actually be clear about what beings were interacting with us because if we just say, oh, I spoke to God or God told me this, it's too amorphous. We don't know what being is actually speaking to us and not all the beings are beneficial. If we take a look at what we're looking at tonight, there's another pattern that's laid within the tree of life which is that it has three different pillars inside of it. There are beings that connect to the middle pillar. They go all the way up and all the way down.
That means they connect to the highest levels of the Godhead and they also connect all the way down to the level of the manifest creation. This is connected to the Christ or christic beings or within the monotheistic traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, they refer to them as mikaelic beings. And so, that idea that mikael holds the quality of the godhead, but reduced and scaled where it can be interacted with at an archangelic level. So toward one hand, toward the left hand pillar, you have spiritual beings that don't understand or really care for the physical world. They're they're not into that.
The physical world is something that seems like a place of suffering and many of the ancient traditions of the world were heavily influenced by these beings with teachings of the physical world being an illusion, of the physical world being a place of suffering, get off the cycle of karma and reincarnation, etcetera. These spiritual beings are advanced spiritual beings, more advanced than human beings, and they also have tremendous spiritual light. When one encounters them, one does not encounter a being of darkness. One encounters a being of tremendous light. And so, the name given to the leader of this particular spiritual group was Lucifer.
But, the Luciferic beings were understood as beings of great spiritual light, but who do not completely understand physical reality or the process of human evolution in the physical world. To them, it seems like we're children being tortured in a place we don't need to be, so get off the cycle and go back to spirit. Now, on the other hand, as you might imagine, it's the exact opposite polarity. It's going to be deeply connected to the process of linking onto the physical materialization process and loving physicality. And, in the Persians or Astrian tradition they referred to these beings as Angra Menu or Aruman.
So human beings can fall into this as well by becoming completely materialistic. So that we don't even believe that spirit exists. Spirit is some type of illusion that we have. There's nothing but random evolution over time through completely physical biological processes and there is no spirit. There's nothing of that kind.
So, this becomes a kind of modern materialistic scientific perspective that's very sharp in some ways, but has absolutely no spiritual perception. And so, for complete materialists they fall completely into this pillar. Now, the Aromonic aspect then took on other names in other times. The Gnostics referred to the being of Aruman or the beings of the same quality referred to as Aromonic beings as the Demiurge. So, you read all these gnostic texts about the demiurge, the dark lord of this earth that created the physical world.
As many different manifestations in the gnostic text and you can find variants on that in other traditions as well like in South America. Then in Egypt, this polarity was referred to as Set. That term Set when the Hebrew people left Egypt led by Moses who had been initiated in the Egyptian temples, that term Set became Satan, and so Set became Satan. Now, Setan is a Hebrew term meaning the adversary, and so it means that this is a being that has an adversarial relationship to the human being. Now, this idea of holding the balance between these two types of beings is something that plays out in everyday life and it's a constant dynamic process for every human being.
If we were to strip array the veil, we would see that these invisible, luciferic, aromatic beings are influencing our consciousness at all times to go to one direction or the other just as the beneficial beings are also connecting with us. And in the ancient temple science, it was understood that our connection to these beings was purely through resonance. When we think in a particular manner, when we feel in a particular manner, all of our thoughts, all of our feelings, all of our internal states have an energetic quality to them, and they will resonate like an antenna with qualities of the exact same type in the other worlds. We're influenced by these types of beings all the time. We are like fish that live in an ocean that don't know there's any water.
These beings are surrounding us all the time and our boundaries are actually not solid. They move through us, our consciousness, our feeling life all the time.
Speaker 4: I think it's really necessary to know what these angels are, where they come from and what their motivations might be. Now, we need to know how they interact with a human being. And to do that, we have to understand the different bodies of the human being because these other bodies are where most of these interactions are taking place.
Speaker 3: So, the next thing we want look at is the structure of the human being. There are different levels of a human being. In the esoteric tradition, we'll talk about a human physical body. In Sanskrit, they refer to as the sheath made of food. That's the literal name in Sanskrit for the physical body.
The sheath made of food because we take in physical substance, we put it into a field of force that is the outline of our body and then it fills it out with physical substance. Then we have the level of life energy that's called chi, ki, prana in the East or the etheric in the West from the greek term for life energy. It's related to the element of water in physical elements. Then we have our consciousness body which includes both our emotional and mental function. Sometimes, this is referred to, generally as the astral or sometimes it's broken down to being the emotional and mental body, which can also be referred to as the lower and upper astral.
But, all just various ways to break it apart. But, essentially, it's the consciousness field of God that we bring into ourselves as an individualized astral body, and that emotion and mind aspect is related to the element of air. And then our self awareness, our I am presence is related to fire. This is what the Rosicrucians refer to as the ego with a capital e. But, it's important to understand that when they say that they don't mean the ego of psychology.
It's not your little ego. This is your I am presence. This is your divine spark of being self aware. So, that's the whole thing through the Jewish kabbalistic mysteries of the burning bush. I am the I am, the seven I am sayings of the Christ and the Gospel of John, etcetera.
Speaker 6: We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
Speaker 8: You suggest that UFOs are deliberately trying to manipulate, our subconscious mind create a mythology in our culture about themselves, is one of the reasons that they're both physical and concrete, yet very elusive at the same time. Do you still feel that way?
Speaker 9: Could the UFO phenomenon be manipulating us? Could it be a teaching system of some sort? Perhaps something that we are creating ourselves. Perhaps a series of images that we are projecting. I think Carl Jung came very close to to expressing that idea in in one of his books.
Speaker 4: Now the reference to Carl Jung at the end isn't accidental. Jungian psychology is often used as a mask to hide these more esoteric ideas within ufology. Now Carl Jung was a Swiss psychologist who introduced the idea of archetypes which are universal symbols shared by all humans in dreams, stories and myths. Now, include figures representing wisdom, protection, guidance similar to angels in various spiritual traditions. Though not directly influenced by Rosicrucianism, Jung's work was shaped by mystical traditions like alchemy and gnosticism which serves as the source for Rosicrucian ideas.
This connection led to Jungian psychology's popularity in ufology where thought leaders like Jacques Vallee and J. Allen Hynek found direct parallels between union archetypes and their own UFO research. I
Speaker 5: mean, I wrote about synchronicity in American Cosmic. I've talked about some of the things that happened to me with respect to synchronicity. You know, Jacques back in the day and even today, you know, still grapples with with this idea of synchronicity and ties it into this invisible college, which is an early modern, idea of Rosicrucianism, actually.
Speaker 4: So beyond synchronicity, which is a very interesting topic by itself, there's another Jungian concept that I believe sheds even more light on this esoteric UFO worldview, and that is the dream.
Speaker 10: Jung thought about the dream as nature speaking of its own accord. And so his idea was, well, when you when you sleep, you dream, but the dream happens to you. It's not something that you create the way that and you don't even think about creating it. Cause I might say, well, what are you thinking about? And you'll say, I'm thinking about whatever it is.
And you'll take credit in some sense for thinking that because it seems like a voluntary activity. But what happens at night is that you think, but you think involuntarily. And so what Jung would say is that means that something is thinking in you. There are things that think in you. What are those things?
And what are they thinking? And why are they thinking it?
Speaker 3: The same thing here. Higher spiritual beings can give us information about what we need to do with our lives to help other people, all kinds of great processes if we have the core concepts to begin with that they can work with. Otherwise, it's really hard to communicate with us in a way that moves up to their level.
Speaker 10: The dream is trying to tell you what it's trying to tell you as clear as it can, that's just the best it can do. And so you could think of the dream and this is I believe the right way to think about it. The dream is the birthplace of thought the same way that artists are the birthplace of culture.
Speaker 7: They are affecting our culture. Many of the religions that we think of as the most important have been part of this process.
Speaker 10: It's exactly the same process. It's that your mind is groping outward to try to comprehend what it has not yet comprehended and it does that first by trying to map it onto image.
Speaker 3: Some people will process the clairvoyance primarily through a type of internal sight and they see all these images on their mental screen. A lot of those images are not actually present in the spiritual world, but they're how they clothe non physical realities so they can access it and they can work with it. And so, that's the imagination stage. We can now see non physical realities in the mind's eye. We can't see with the physical eyes that there's an angelic being in front of us, but in the mind's eye we can begin to perceive that form.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
"Disclosure" is understanding that the Air Battle of 1561 hasn't happened yet. https://t.co/ggHRvZKyE7
reSee.it AI Summary
MK ULTRA has evolved into fully weaponized tools that can induce madness, easily portable in a backpack. When questioned about their lethal potential, a chilling acknowledgment was made. During a 2024 Homeland Security Committee hearing, Rep. Eli Crane addressed the heart of the matter regarding Anomalous Health Incidents.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 MK ULTRA IS NOW FULLY WEAPONIZED Weapons designed to make you feel crazy that can fit in a backpack. When asked if they knew of anyone these weapons have killed in the past the answer was a sombre "I do". The Homeland Security Committee held a hearing on Anomalous Health Incidents (AHI) in 2024 and Rep. Eli Crane got to the core of the issue.
Video Transcript AI Summary
These weapons are designed to make targets feel like they're imagining things, especially with low-intensity, long-duration exposure.
I know people with AHI symptoms who have died from their ailments. I have seen a 1991 version of the weapon; it looked like a satellite dish with a unit attached. Miniaturization has happened over the years, but antenna size (related to the wave) limits how small it can get. Still, it can be contained in a car trunk or even a large backpack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy, like they're imagining things, especially on the low duration, the low intensity long duration hits.
Speaker 1: Are either of you aware of any individuals who have AHI symptoms, have passed away from their ailments?
Speaker 2: I do.
Speaker 0: I do.
Speaker 1: Have any of you, three panelists ever seen one of these weapons?
Speaker 2: I have seen a 1991 version of the weapon, and it looks, like a satellite dish with, with a unit this size attached to it. This, of course, over the years, miniaturization, has been possible. Obviously, there is a limitation to how miniaturized it can be because of the antenna size, which can always is always related to the wave. But still, it is something that can be well contained in a in a trunk of a car or even a large backpack.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
How prophecy, remote viewing, and telepathy work. 🤯 Itzhak Bentov used science to study altered states and developed a holographic model of consciousness. Also invented the modern cardiac catheter. A brilliant mind who was killed in the Chicago O'Hare plane crash of 1979. https://t.co/hrclVJyA4o
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our senses are limited, offering a narrow view of reality. As we evolve, this view expands, revealing a broader understanding of a single, large reality. Think of how our perception of color has evolved over time.
Imagine a bell curve illustrating population distribution. Most people are somewhat intelligent. At one end, a few remain like gorillas, while at the other end, a few are highly evolved. Evolution is pushing us away from the "gorilla types."
In the future, this curve will shift. The average person will be highly evolved and what we consider retarded today, and the cutting edge will be unimaginable. Where do you find the leading edge of evolution today? I suggest, in mental hospitals, because they live in a different reality and are not adapted to ours. Those that can integrate it become geniuses like Newton or Darwin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All our senses are limited. So with these limited senses, we naturally are seeing through a very narrow kind of tube or very narrow slit in the total reality there is. Mhmm. Now as you're evolving, what happens is that that slit opens up opens up more and more and more. So you see more and more of that reality and we assume that we see different realities.
They're not very different realities, but rather an a very extended broad view of one very large reality. The Bible mentions maybe four to six colors maximum. Yeah. That is what people saw just a bear maybe four thousand years ago. Nowadays we see hundreds and thousands of colors.
That is our visual system has evolved. Let me draw what is called a bell curve, which looks somehow like this. This bell curve gives us a good picture of where most of the population is. That is what typifies population. We can use this diagram also to describe evolution.
The bulk of the population today, the population today is this intelligent, more or less intelligent biocrato, right? And with a vertical spine and who pushes the buttons on TV and drives a car, car, etcetera, etcetera. Now there is some back throw that is there are some people here in this area, very few people who are still gorilla like. That is very hairy. They beat their chest when they see their neighbors and a few other things.
And then we have other people who are here in this corner, very few of them, who are very highly developed because we say that evolution is now pushing mankind in this direction away from the gorilla types, towards the very highly evolved people. This point, we're here. What's going to happen maybe a million years from now, half million years from now? This curve is going to shift. It's going to shift like this.
That is the bulk of the population will be very, very highly evolved. We have gone away altogether from the gorilla types. No more gorillas. And what we have here now is the average man is now the retarded person, uh-huh, in evolutionary terms. The bulk of the population is extremely, very, very highly evolved, and the cutting edge of evolution here, these are very, very highly evolved people.
We can't even imagine what kind what kind of person that will be. He may not have a physical body at all. What's the habitat, so to speak, of this group here? Well, you just go out and you find them. They're they're all over the place.
The habitat of this group here, what do you think where do you think you find these people here, Pete?
Speaker 1: I I suspect that you would find them in universities. You'd find the, you know, the people who are very bright, people who are, in the leading edge of professions. That's I
Speaker 0: mean, it's an intellectual thing. Well, I suggest that you find them in mental hospitals in that house. And the reason for that is that these people, they live in a different reality, in a reality which which is very changed and few of them are adapted to live in this reality. So naturally, they can't function very well. So the only safe place, only good place for them would be the mental hospital unless they can integrate their their their different view of reality with their daily lives.
Now if they can integrate it, then we have people like like Newton, like Darwin, like like, like, Claraday. These are the so called genius.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
"WHAT?!" 🤯 - Joe can't believe what Mel Gibson tells him about the Pope. Gibson says his next film will be about the battle between good and evil. 👼 👿 https://t.co/K94FhQAsVU
Video Transcript AI Summary
A pope introduced the South American idol Pachamama into the church, leading to worship within the Vatican, which raises concerns about apostasy and worshiping false gods. This parallels biblical events where people turned to false idols, like the golden calf. There’s speculation about the motives behind these actions, suggesting that larger spiritual battles between good and evil are at play, impacting institutions that claim to connect with the divine. This struggle may lead to unintentional loss of ground for good, influenced by deception. Each day, there’s a personal commitment to avoid self-deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, we got a pope that brought a a South American idol into the church to worship. Really? He did. The Pachamama. He bought the South and he got What it I don't I don't know what that is.
It's, it's kinda like a South American god Pachamama. It's just Why would he do that? Good question. But he did. So he brought that in?
Yeah. Into the Vatican. Then the higher he the hierarchy even worshiped that there's a ceremony around it outside. What? Well, that constitutes apostasy.
Yeah. Worshipping false gods. Yeah. Moses goes up on the mountain. He comes back down.
People are false gods. Yeah. Moses goes up on the mountain. He comes back down. People are worshiping in a golden calf.
Yeah. You know? It's it's that. Yeah. So you can't do that.
Do you think there's a motive behind these things? I don't think you'd no. Probably. What do you think it is? I don't know.
But it isn't good. I think look. I think we're we're we're looking at a world where and this is the in the next film I'm gonna do, I'm gonna try and tackle this question. That there are big realms, spiritual realms. There's good, there's evil, and they are slugging it out for the souls of mankind.
And my question is, why are we even important? Little old flawed humanity, why are we important in that process where the big realms are slugging it out over us? And I think there's bigger things at play here. And institutions that purport to touch on the divine are necessarily going to be affected by that slug fest that's going on between good and evil. Right.
And sometimes good gives up ground. Yeah. And maybe not on purpose. You know, maybe there's some deception involved or self deception. Collected.
Every morning when I wake up, I actually pray that I don't deceive myself.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
MK Ultra in your computer screens!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Computer screens are predominantly blue-lit due to technology developed in a CIA program linked to Operation Paperclip. In the mid-20th century, the CIA conducted experiments at Tulane involving neurosurgeons who explored behavioral control through electrical stimulation of the brain. Professor Delgado proposed wireless control using RFID chips, leading the CIA to consider using light from screens for similar effects. This technology was later utilized by companies like Google and Meta. Interestingly, the initial concept originated from the mafia in Las Vegas, who created a controlled environment with blue-lit slot machines and free alcohol to increase gambling profits, inspiring the CIA's program.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reason that all your computer screens are blue lit, the reason none of them are red lit, the reason none of them pay attention to circadian biology is because that original technology was developed in a government program that Bobby Kennedy knows about. And I happen to know about because I went to medical school at LSU. For those of you who've never heard about Operation Paperclip, you think it's all conspiracy theory. So at Tulane Neurology and Tulane Neurosurgery in the fifties sixties seventies eighties, the CIA started a program there where they would do all these crazy things to monkeys. CIA wanted to see how they can control things utilizing different things like drugs and things like that.
When the neurosurgeons got involved, which is my clade, we would drill tops of the heads off, put wires into the thalamus, put electricity in there, and kinda see what kind of behavioral changes we could have. One of the guys that was in that program was a guy named Professor Delgado. When he saw that we could control the behavior with the wired device, he said, what if we do it wireless? So he checked it in monkeys and checked it in bulls, and it turned out you can do it wirelessly with RFID chips and semiconductors. Then the CIA took it to the next level.
They said, well, since this is electromagnetic radiation, what if we did it through light, through screens? And it turns out, you can. And that's the reason why all your computer screens have the frequencies they have. So why is this all important? Well, the person that set this meeting up between me and Bobby is the patent attorney that made sure that Google and Meta have those things so they can control the things that we all do.
Where did the original idea come from that started off in with the CIA? You're gonna be surprised when you hear this. Came from the mafia in Las Vegas. They wanted to build a new city in a desert. They enclosed it all, blocked out the windows, invented slot machines that were blue lit, and they found out that they didn't have to take a gun, stick it in your face to steal your money.
Then they even got smarter. They said, let's give people free alcohol while they're doing that, and they found out they got the money quicker. And that's when the CIA got the idea to start this program. That's really how it started.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
Learn more about MK Ultra here https://theufotimeline.com/events/mk-ultra/
MK Ultra - The UFO Timeline
MK Ultra was a covert CIA program initiated in 1953 aimed at developing techniques for mind control and psychological manipulation through the use of drugs, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and other means. Thousands of unwitting individuals were subjected to experiments, often without their consent. The program led to severe psychological trauma and, in some cases, death. It was officially halted in 1973, and much of the evidence was destroyed, but the program was later exposed to the public, leading to widespread controversy and investigations into the ethics of government experiments on citizens.
theufotimeline.com
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
🚨 YES. The CIA can put voices in your head. Harvard Scientist exposes CIA mind control weapons! https://t.co/5FUENBqWa5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Artificial intelligence can influence individuals by breaking down their ego. Many targets are misled into believing they are being controlled by external forces, such as aliens or demons. For instance, in school shootings, perpetrators often report hearing voices. Myron May, who opened fire at Florida State University, believed he needed to create a spectacle to highlight his reality. He sent out numerous packages of information before the attack, which resulted in injuries and his death in a police shootout. If individuals commit violent acts, proving brain manipulation is challenging, as media narratives often portray them as unstable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can use this artificial intelligence voice in the head to break down the ego and control an individual. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: yes. You can't plug your eardrums. You can't stop the sound. A lot of, the targets are tricked into believing evil aliens have abducted their brains. Demons They're tricked?
Speaker 0: Yes. How are they tricked?
Speaker 1: They're told. By who? By the voices. In a lot of these school shootings, I think that you hear about on the news, they hear voices. And we've learned that Cruz told the BSO detective that he heard a demon in his head.
And police now say he also heard voices.
Speaker 0: Who heard voices in his head?
Speaker 1: The scripts, they're called, and they're meant to confuse the very derogatory. That's just typical breakdown. And why would you wanna break down the ego of that person? To rebuild it. So this gets into creating, mentoring candidates.
Speaker 2: Police have released video made by the man who opened fire at Florida State University.
Speaker 1: In Project Soul Catch, I referred to a Myron May as a Myron May. Right. As a psychobomb. They didn't care who the target was. They were just trying to make him explode and do something bad.
He was a lawyer trained there. His reasoning why he shot up the school was he needed news publicity to make sure people understood this was real. And he left the video testimony. As sick as this may sound, I've even had stalkers follow me into church.
Speaker 0: He believed government stalkers were harassing him and using a direct energy weapon to hurt him.
Speaker 1: But he gave out, 70 packages in the mail, and the FBI intercepted the most. What were these packages? Just information. Just information.
Speaker 2: May then open fire at an FSU library wounding 3 people. He was killed in a shootout with police.
Speaker 0: If these people do explode and do something bad like this, there's absolutely no way to prove that there's been any sort of manipulation to the brain. In this guy's case, he talked about it. I mean, obviously, he took
Speaker 1: But but it was covered up. He's
Speaker 0: the way they they way they write the article, he sounds like a crazy person.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
WTF is going on?? In October 2024 an object was recorded by security cameras flying out of the sky and slamming into a parked semi truck. After the impact It immediately flys off. https://t.co/zlfRpiYn0F
Video Transcript AI Summary
Salinas, California, is experiencing incidents involving projectiles and explosives. Something powerful struck a truck, shattering its glass. This is not a firework; the damage is significant and alarming.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Salinas, California. Check this out. Someone in Salinas is shooting projectiles. Explosives. Check this out, fellas.
This is not a firework. Whatever hit hit this, it even blew out the the glass on this truck. That's nuts.
@TUPACABRA2 - TUPACABRA
The year before the MH370 videos were posted to YouTube a man in Spain recorded an identical phenomenon from his backyard. https://t.co/inYwJZu0DR