TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @upholdreality
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Colombia President Petro: "A clan of pedophiles wants to destroy our democracy. To keep Epstein's list from coming out, they send warships to kill fishermen and threaten our neighbor with invasion for their oil. They want to turn the region into another Lybia, full of slaves." https://t.co/xhBpwL5TUL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The speaker argues that a “plan of pedophiles” aims to end democracy in Colombia, stating that despite the harsh reality, they would not allow themselves to be silenced or betrayed by invading neighbors. They claim people would not applaud invading a brother country or a neighbor, emphasizing that the Colombian people are not the enemy, and that invading Venezuela would be traitorous.
Speaker: They reject the idea of Venezuela as a villain and say they do not mock the Venezuelan people or trap them in an invasion driven only by oil greed and violence. They warn that such actions would turn this corner of South America into a place like Syria, Iraq, or Libya, filled with slavery and slave trading, and would degrade the region.
Speaker: They criticize those “friends of STEIN” who do not want the list to appear in the United States and assert that these friends want to use violence to force the United States to ignore its own government, fueling xenophobia, racism, and ideas of racial superiority to distract from domestic issues.
Speaker: They state that the Colombian president has long denunciated narcotraffickers, but note that the narcotraffickers who have been denounced have always been in power in Colombia, in the State.
Speaker: The speaker reiterates a stance against betraying bloodlines or supporting invasions of brother countries, condemning any move by the Colombian president to seize lands for invasion from Colombia into a neighboring country. They denounce the president as “maldito” (damned) for generations to come for such a betrayal.
Speaker: They emphasize that they do not belong to those who wanted to kill Bolívar, defending Bolívar’s legacy and the dignity of the region, while criticizing external powers’ influence and urging a stance against internal complicity with narcotrafficking and imperialist motives.
Overall: The speaker frames a narrative of political betrayal, invasion threats, and manipulation by external actors framed as defending democracy and regional unity, while opposing violence against neighboring peoples, denouncing narcotrafficking within Colombia, and calling out alleged foreign influence and manipulation aimed at destabilizing the region.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Un plan de pedófilos quiere acabar la democracia en Colombia, duro, sí, pero ahí está la realidad, y para que no salga la lista entonces nos envían acorazados a matar pescadores de esta ciudad, y amenazar al vecino, que si dictador o no, ¿cómo que el pueblo de Colombia va a aplaudir, que invadan a su hermano, que no es el presidente, sino el pueblo de Venezuela? ¿Cuándo? Seríamos así de traidores y de vendidos de que nuestra propia sangre la traicionamos o el pueblo del Ecuador o el pueblo de Panamá o el pueblo de Venezuela no es nuestro propio pueblo. Entonces quieren que el presidente haga lo que quería hacer Duque, cobarde, prestar las tierras de Colombia para que desde ahí se invadiera a un país hermano que tiene la misma historia que nosotros, porque allá nació Bolívar y vino a morir aquí en esta ciudad. No se puede, presidente de Colombia que haga eso, presidente maldito por las generaciones futuras, porque nunca será olvidado como un traidor.
Y yo no pertenezco a los que querían matar a Bolívar, el gobierno de Venezuela ha hecho muchas críticas, pero no me burlo del pueblo de Venezuela ni construye una trampa para que caiga el pueblo de Venezuela en la trampa de una invasión que solo va por su petróleo, que se quiere es codicia y violencia más para hacer de esta esquina hermosa del continente sudamericano, una Siria, un Irak, una Libia llena de esclavos, de venta de esclavos, de nuevo negros, ¿no? La lista de los amigos de STEIN que no quiere que aparezca la lista en los Estados Unidos, nos quiere utilizar aquí con la violencia para que el pueblo de los Estados Unidos no piense en su propio gobierno, sino que se le suba la xenofobia, el racismo, las ideas de la raza superior y otras ideas falsas y nos usan para no discutir sus propios problemas, presidente de Colombia lo que ha hecho es denunciar narcotraficantes durante décadas, y los narcotraficantes que ha denunciado siempre estuvieron en el poder político de Colombia, en el Estado.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
CIA whistleblower John Stockwell (1989): "We've killed at least 6 million people."
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've set out to overthrow functioning constitutional democracies in over 20 countries. We manipulated elections in dozens of countries. We created standing armies and directed them to fight. We went after to organize ethnic minorities to encourage them to revolt. In Nicaragua, "the Mosquito Indians ... given them more money than they had seen in the entirety of history and arms and training" were sent into Nicaragua to attack, kill, fight, rape, burn, pillage. This is an insidious thing. "This has been a technique the CI has used in Nicaragua, in Thailand, in Vietnam, in Laos, in The Congo, and in Iran Iraq with the Kurds." We created, trained, and funded death squads like the treasury police in El Salvador that are responsible for killing as many as 70,000 people according to the count of the Catholic church. "We've assassinated world leaders, including The United States president in 1963." Chile 1973: CIA organized the overthrow of Salvador Allende, Allende killed, Schneider killed, Pinochet in power. Kissinger: "the issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." "6,000,000 people killed" minimum; "22,000 in Nicaragua"—mostly "rag poor peasants, including a high percentage of women and children."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've set out to overthrow functioning constitutional democracies in over 20 countries. We manipulated elections in dozens of countries. We created standing armies and directed them to fight. We went after to organize ethnic minorities to encourage them to revolt. The first thing we did in Nicaragua was to go to the Mosquito Indians who had never gotten along with the other people in Nicaragua very well and give them more money than they had seen in the entirety of history and arms and training and rationales and sanctuaries in Honduras and sent them into Nicaragua to attack, kill, fight, rape, burn, pillage.
And this is an insidious thing. Every society is torn with racial conflicts and conflicts with minorities. Think how violent our nation is. Think what if there were a super superpower so big that we didn't dare even flap back or strike back at them that we're coming to our minorities with huge sums of money and arms and and and training people from our minority groups and sending them into the country to do open acts of violence. How we would rise up and the bloodbath that would ensue.
And this has been a technique the CI has used in Nicaragua, in Thailand, in Vietnam, in Laos, in The Congo, and in Iran Iraq with the Kurds in different parts of the world. We created, trained, and funded death squads like the treasury police in El El Salvador that are responsible for killing as many as 70,000 people according to the count of the Catholic church. And we've assassinated world leaders, including The United States president in 1963, and I'll get to that in more detail in just a moment. Getting back to the subject of democracy since that that's something that Bush and everyone is talking about right now. I remind you of Chile.
In 1973, the CIA organized the overthrow of Salvador Allende, the democratically elected president of Chile. And he was killed in the process, and we killed general Schneider, who was the pro US defender of the constitution there, in order to put the CI's representative Pinochet in power. And Henry Kissinger's, when he was grilled by the congress over this program, his rationale was, yes, the issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves. Now there was a long CI destabilization and propaganda campaign against China. We were parachuting teams from Quemoy Matsu, Tibet, Burma, Thailand to destabilize China with the propaganda campaign, the propaganda aimed at The United States as well as, China and other parts of the world until eventually we talked ourselves into the Korean War in which a million people were where we fought China and Korea, and a million people were killed.
There was a long CI destabilization and propaganda campaign against Vietnam until we talked ourselves into going into Vietnam to fight, and two million people were killed. Again, read for yourselves. Read Bill Blum's book, The CIA, A Forgotten History. Read Portrait of a Cold Warrior by Joseph Burkholder Smith, who was a CIA case officer in Southeast Asia. Read Fire in the Lake by Francis Fitzgerald, the daughter of Desmond Fitzgerald, the famous CI chief of operations of Southeast Asia.
Read Deadly Deceit by Ralph McGeehy, another case officer who served in Southeast Asia. Read Decent Interval by Frank Snepp who covered the period of time in Vietnam 7375. He and I were colleagues there at that time. Or if you will, read my own book, in search of enemies by Norton, which remains the only insider's detailed account of the of the inner functionings of a covert action, or read Washington's war on Nicaragua by Holly Sklar, not written by an insider, but a remarkable detail on the Nicaraguan operation, great detail of how that operation has been run. Trying to come to grips with these CI activities and these broad numbers, trying to figure out how many people have been killed, you can count it up different ways.
You can never be sure how many people are killed in the jungles of of Laos or the hills of Nicaragua. But adding them up as best we can, we come up with a figure of 6,000,000 people killed, minimum figure. It has to be more than that. A million in the Korean War, two million in the Vietnam War, eight hundred thousand in Indonesia, a couple of million in Cambodia, twenty thousand in Angola, the operation I was part of, twenty two thousand in Nicaragua. Again, the figure the New York Times cites.
You're dealing with large numbers of people who died who would not have died if our tax dollars had not been spent by the CIA to exacerbate situations and destabilize and set people to fighting. So you began to analyze these figures to figure out who who who are these 6,000,000 people we've killed. And, again, that's a minimum figure. The conservatives tell us it's a dangerous world. Our enemies have to die so we can be safe and secure.
Some of them say, I'm sorry about that, but that's the way the world is. We have to accept this reality. So you begin to study these things and rip through them and analyze them and break them apart, and you find some shocking common denominators come out to you. Namely, for example, since 1954, we do not parachute teams into the Soviet Union to destabilize the country in a brutal way. Coincidentally, 1954 was the first year the Soviets developed their actual capability of actually dropping atomic weapons on The United States.
For other reasons, we don't do these things in England, France, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Switzerland, etcetera. These things are all done in countries of the third world where the governments don't have the power to force The United States to stop destabilizing the country and brutalizing their people. These 6,000,000 people killed are people of the Mitumba Mountains of The Congo and the jungles of Southeast Asia and the hills of Northern Nicaragua. Conspicuously, they're people who don't have ICBMs or armies or navies. They don't have any capability of doing physical hurt to The United States.
The 22,000 killed in Nicaragua, for example, they're conspicuously not Russians. They're not Cuban soldiers or advisers. They're not even percentage wise mostly. They're mostly rag poor peasants, including a high percentage of women and children. Communists, I'm sorry.
They're mostly Roman Catholics. Enemies of The United States, I can't give you that one either because we have all these witnesses who've gone down to live in their villages with them, and they invariably come back to testify that the Nicaraguans are the warmest people on the face of the earth. And they love people from The United States, and they simply cannot understand why we would want our leaders would want to rationalize spending a billion dollars on a contra force to go into their villages, to kill them, and mutilate them while their families are forced to watch.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Gee I wonder why the U.S. wants to invade Venezuela https://t.co/C1IFG7KTZ0
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
25-year Green Beret and Purple Heart awardee Lt. Col. Tony Aguilar tears up telling Tucker Carlson the war crimes and engineered starvation he witnessed in Gaza https://t.co/VqhhNQxJ9A
Video Transcript AI Summary
Witnessing starvation in Gaza, exacerbated by inadequate aid from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund, is real. The speaker accuses Israel of systematically committing war crimes, including displacement, targeting civilians, and collectively punishing the population.
The IDF allegedly treats Palestinians like animals, with some even dehumanizing them. The speaker recounts meeting a young boy named Amir at a distribution site who showed them a sign of respect. The boy was emaciated, without shoes, and likely hadn't eaten or bathed in days. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation provides no water with the food, claiming it's too expensive.
The speaker alleges the distribution sites are death traps. He witnessed the IDF shooting at crowds leaving a distribution site, and Amir was killed. The speaker calls for the US to defund the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation immediately and demand accountability, as it is not adequately addressing the needs of the population. The speaker questions why the US government is funding the IDF, which he describes as undisciplined and committing daily war crimes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I witnessed Palestinian parents, men and with mothers and fathers,
Speaker 1: carrying their dead children in their arms, skeletons. I witnessed that. I've witnessed people that have come on to the sites that you can see that they are just completely emaciated and starving. That's not fake.
Speaker 0: So if if the deniers wanna think that we got Stanley Kubrick to go into Gaza and take a bunch of crisis actors and shoot a film on to, you know, to fake this starvation, but it's real, and people are dying. At this point right now, because we, The United States, the Gaza Humanitarian Fund, put up our hand and said, we'll do it. The starvation at this point has gotten worse than it
Speaker 1: was before because the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's process
Speaker 0: is leading to that starvation because it's not delivering enough aid, not even nearly enough, not even nearly to be to be a fraction of enough. Because I feel like someone handed Bibi Netanyahu a list of the violations of the Geneva Convention, but but, like, took the took the numbers off of it, and he's just checking them off, Like, displacing the population. Well, do that. It's like, okay. Well, that that's a war crime.
Firing at the civilians to to control the population. Okay. Well, targeting civilians with lethal ammunition to control the population verbatim is a
Speaker 1: war crime. So you got
Speaker 0: that one. Check. What next? What do you got next? We're gonna build the humanitarian distribution sites in the middle of combat zones?
Oh, shit. There's there's protocol three. Got it. You just did that one. What's next?
Oh, how about we, we label the entire society as as got as Hamas and kill them all? Wow. Bingo. You just got us straight across because now you just made another war crime statement because the Geneva Convention specifically inhibits the classification of an entire population as the enemy based on the actions of a few.
Speaker 1: Is Hamas all of all of Gaza? No. No. Of course, it's not. Are we treating them like they're all Hamas?
Yes. We are. Another war crime. So when I
Speaker 0: bring up these points about war crimes, it's not this this politicized, bombastic, you know, like, oh, you stepped on my foot. That's a war crime. Like, the war crimes are verbatim. The things that they say, not us, they they say it. We're displacing the population to move them to do combat operations.
That's a war crime. I mean, I don't know what to tell you.
Speaker 2: How did the Israeli military, the IDF, treat Palestinian civilians?
Speaker 0: I could describe it as as as nothing more than they treated them like animals. Even the the UG Solutions and the SRS personnel on the ground, what was concerning to me because I witnessed this in years of Iraq when you get down the road and you start describing people in a certain way, you start to dehumanize them.
Speaker 1: Even The US contractors on the ground called called them the the the zombie hoard. We the IDF, and in some cases, we don't recognize these people as human beings. This little boy is similar in age to to my son, brown eyes.
Speaker 0: My son has brown eyes. I see my son's
Speaker 1: face when I look at him. And
Speaker 0: this little boy, you know, he's not he's not ISIS.
Speaker 1: He's not a combatant. This was on Secure Distribution Site Number 2, the May 28, our second day of doing distribution. I'm on that location. I didn't get this secondhand. I didn't see it from afar and then and then assume.
I saw it. I touched it. I felt it. Other people saw it. This young little boy, his name is Amir.
I know that because when
Speaker 0: he walked over from the the crowd of people, he walked toward me. There was two there was two of us standing there, two UG Solutions guards standing in that area, and he was walking towards us. And we thought maybe he was hurt or maybe he was asking for some more food because all he had in his arms was a small bag of rice, half a bag of flour, some lentils that he had picked up from the ground. He didn't have much.
Speaker 1: And we thought maybe he was asking for more food or maybe he was hurt, and he we back we notioned him over, and he came up, and he extends his right hand at us. And so we I, you know,
Speaker 0: I kinda walked up to him and waved him over, and the guy standing next to me, this young boy, grabs holds his hand, and he
Speaker 1: kisses it. And then he comes to me, and he holds my hand, he kisses it. In in Arab culture, that is
Speaker 0: a very significant sign of respect. That's not something that that should be taken lightly or something that should be that that's a big sign of respect. And we were we were taken aback by that. The gentleman that was standing next to me was also a military veteran, combat veteran. So he's been to Afghanistan, Iraq, and he understand he was he was moved by it.
Speaker 1: He was touched. I was touched. And as he was standing there, we
Speaker 0: were both looking at him, and he was very emaciated. He had no shoes on. His pants were tattered. He had a a a kind of a rope or string holding his pants up. Filthy.
Probably hasn't bathed in months. Probably hasn't eaten in days. And, oh, by the way, when they walk eight to 12 kilometers to get
Speaker 1: to these sites, the Gazit Humanitarian Foundation mechanism provides no water. Zero. Not a single bottle because it's too expensive. Distributing water weighs so much that it breaks down the the the profit per cost per truck.
Speaker 0: That's a fact. Because I asked why, and I was given a lesson in it.
Speaker 1: This is why. It's too expensive. So we give them no water.
Speaker 0: All of their food, by the way, requires water to cook it. Rice, lentils, beans, flour. You gotta have water. So what we're giving them, I don't know how they're eating it, but he comes he's standing there, and I and I put my arm on his on his right
Speaker 1: on on his left shoulder. And I look at him, and I can feel the bones in his shoulder. I can feel the the the weakness in his arm. I can feel the vulnerability. I can feel the desperation.
Speaker 0: And I look at him, and I looked and I got down on my knees where I I'm looking at him in the eyes, and then I say to him, I said, people care.
Speaker 1: America cares. You're not gonna be forgotten. People in the world care.
Speaker 0: And he doesn't speak English, and I don't speak Arabic. But the connection we had in looking at each other, he felt like
Speaker 1: he felt he felt for the first time in a long
Speaker 0: time that there was someone that cared. And I got down on
Speaker 1: a knee, and he came in to his level. And the
Speaker 0: items he had in his hand, he sets
Speaker 1: them down on the ground. And he his hands
Speaker 0: he raises his hands, and they're small, fragile. You can you can see bones, know, just the bones to
Speaker 1: the skin. And he places his hands on my face, and he kissed me. And he said he looked at me in the eyes, and he says, thank you. He said it in English. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Like,
Speaker 1: people are starving in Gaza. People are dying in Gaza. These children that are starving and dying, these these children, you know,
Speaker 0: they look like everyday Americans. This child is picking up noodles off the ground with his bare hands because there was no food left, so he's picking up noodles to put into his backpack. Amir goes back toward back to the main group, and he goes out the exit. We had a very strict protocol that they come in a certain way, get the aid, and then
Speaker 1: they go out a certain way. From the way
Speaker 0: they came in, it takes them back to the way they came in. The the exit takes them back that same way. So they enter from the Morag Corridor. They go south. They go through the station.
They exit, and they go north to the Morag Corridor. So coming in and going out, they're tied right back into the active combat zone. Site Number 2 particularly is a little bit different than the other sites because it's in between Site 1 And 2, and there's a IDF combat outpost just off the corner of SDS 2. So there's a berm that lines that road going out. So if people are leaving the exit and someone is on the the east side of
Speaker 1: the berm shooting into the crowd over here, you can't see what's on the other side
Speaker 0: of that berm because of the the the obscuration, the field of fire. So the IDF are shooting at the crowd that's leaving. As the crowd left and they would hit the Moroc Corridor to go west, the IDF would shoot at them, shoot at their feet, shoot over their head. We would shoot at them. Shoot at their feet, shoot over their head, shoot into the air, and the bullets start hitting off the ground.
There's video of this. It's on the BBC video. Hitting off
Speaker 1: the ground, see dirt flying up, and I I was still on the site. I was I was below the berm. It was the
Speaker 0: second time we had done distribution. So when I heard the gunfire kick off, the automatic machine gun fire, I thought we were under attack. I thought something had happened. So I ran up to the Southern Berm, and I laid down to take cover. You know, I'm observing, and I'm looking, and I see the shooting keep going on by just the rap and Palestinians dropping on the side of the road.
Speaker 1: So Emir didn't make it home. He walked 12 kilometers to get some food,
Speaker 0: picked up scraps off the ground, because that's all that was left because the the eight minute mayhem took all of the food. And by the time he got there, walking with no shoes, hungry and tired, the only thing left for him was to pick up some remnants off the ground. And when he
Speaker 1: left, he was he was he was killed by the IDF. Why? Because they lack discipline, they lack standards, and they lack basic human decency. The only way I could describe the sites is death traps. And they didn't become death traps.
They were designed as death traps. And The United States puts aid, and we lure them in. And when
Speaker 0: they leave, they get shot at coming,
Speaker 1: they get shot at going. So the reports you hear from from Nasser Hospital The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation should cease to exist, and here's why. The existence of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and its creation and existence creates a misnomer, a lie that this mechanism is working and that the UN is not needed.
Speaker 0: That's a lie.
Speaker 1: Regardless of what we call the method, whether it's GHF, whether it's the UN, whether it's Greta Thunberg handing out PBJ sandwiches on the Mediterranean beach, whatever the method is, it has to be
Speaker 0: able to feed 2,210,000 people a day, three meals a day, every day, and and bring in water, fuel. Remember, the GHF aid brings no water, no Pampers, no diapers, no fuel, no medicine, no hygiene products,
Speaker 1: just dried food. Nothing else. Nothing else. So the method, whatever it is,
Speaker 0: needs to be a method that can handle the capacity of 500 to 550 trucks a day every day. The United States should cease funding the Gazette Humanitarian Foundation now today. Demand accountability on where that money went. Because I can tell you, seeing there and being there and the resources that
Speaker 1: we spent, I don't know
Speaker 0: where that 30,000,000 went. It didn't go to Gaza. Somebody better check some bank accounts.
Speaker 2: Yes. Immediately. But but should but it wasn't the Gazi Humanitarian Foundation that shot a mirror. So the question is, why would US taxpayers Oh, Yeah. That was right.
Speaker 0: Fair point.
Speaker 2: You described the IDF as totally without decency, undisciplined people who committed war crimes on a daily basis. Why would the US government be funding that?
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Ross Douthat: "You would prefer the human race survive, right?" Peter Thiel: "I don't know" https://t.co/0cG9nQWcRS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss transhumanism and its relationship to religion. One speaker expresses ambivalence about the human race enduring, while also desiring radical problem-solving. Transhumanism aims for radical transformation into an immortal body, but current transformations are seen as insufficient. Orthodox Christianity critiques transhumanism for only changing the body, not the soul.
One speaker believes religion should embrace scientific progress, as divine providence encompasses human achievements. They suggest that Christianity promises a perfected body and soul through God's grace, contrasting this with a dystopian outcome for those who pursue it through technology alone.
One speaker posits that Judeo-Christian inspiration is about transcending nature and overcoming flaws with God's help. They claim the word "nature" does not appear in the Old Testament.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You would prefer the human race to endure. Right? You're hesitating. Well, I Yes?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I I would I would
Speaker 0: is a long hesitation. So many it's so long hesitation.
Speaker 1: There's so many questions and puts
Speaker 0: in Should the human race survive? Yes. Okay.
Speaker 1: But I also would like us to radically solve these problems. And so it's always, I don't know. Yeah, transhumanism this The ideal was this radical transformation where your human natural body gets transformed into an immortal body. And there's a critique of, let's say, the trans people in a sexual context or, I don't know, transvestite is someone who changes their clothes and cross dresses. And a transsexual is someone where you change your penis into a vagina.
And we can then debate how well those surgeries work. But we want more transformation than that. The critique is not that it's weird and unnatural. It's man, it's so pathetically little. Okay, want more than cross dressing or changing your sex organs.
We want you to be able to change your heart and change your mind and change your whole your whole body. And then Orthodox Christianity, by the way, the critique Orthodox Christianity has of this is these things don't go far enough. Like that transhumanism is just changing your body, but you also need to transform your soul. And you need to transform your your whole self.
Speaker 0: And so Right. But the other wait. Wait. Wait. I sorry.
I I generally agree with your what I think is your belief that religion should be a friend to science and ideas of scientific progress. I think any idea of divine providence has to encompass the fact that we have progressed and achieved and and done things that would have been unimaginable to our ancestors. But it still also seems like, yeah, the the promise of Christianity in the end is you get you get the perfected body and the perfected soul through god's grace, and the person who tries to do it on their own with a bunch of machines is likely to end up as a dystopian character.
Speaker 1: Well, it's let's let's articulate this.
Speaker 0: And you can have a heretical form of Christianity, right, that says something else.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I think the word nature does not occur once in the Old Testament. And so if
Speaker 0: you
Speaker 1: And there is a sense in which the way I understand the Judeo Christian inspiration is it is about transcending nature. It is about overcoming things. The closest thing you can say to nature is that people are fallen and that that's the natural thing in a Christian sense is that you're messed up. And that's true. But there's some ways that with God's help, you are supposed to transcend that and overcome that.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Milei refuses to apologize for $LIBRA memecoin scam: "If you went to a casino and lost money, what's the complaint?" On promoting the scheme: "I didn't promote it, I spread it... I used my personal account" "But you're the president" His lawyer then interrupts the interview https://t.co/ojncW9jVDo
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you go to a casino and lose money, what's the complaint? You knew the risks involved. It's a problem between private parties, with no state involvement. Those who participated did so voluntarily.
I only diffused it, I didn't promote it. Our Minister of Justice, Mariano Acuña Olivarona, will handle the judicial strategy. He understands this matter.
It's important to note that I tweeted about this from my personal account as a citizen. Yes, I am the president, but it was from my personal account. I am aware of the trial and remain calm regarding it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: La la realidad es, si vos vas al casino y perdés plata.
Speaker 1: Sí.
Speaker 0: Digo, ¿cuál es el reclamo? Si vos sabías que, digamos, tenía esas características. Es decir, entonces, es muy interesante que aquellos que participaron en eso, no solo que lo hicieron voluntariamente, es un problema entre privados, porque acá el estado no juega ningún rol, digo que eso quede claro, y además, lo hicieron voluntariamente.
Speaker 1: Y está bien, el presidente lo promocione eso.
Speaker 0: Yo no lo promocioné, yo lo que hice, lo difundí. Bueno, es lo mismo. No, no, no es lo mismo, no es lo mismo.
Speaker 1: No, no, no es lo mismo. No, no, no, no, no es lo mismo. No, no, no, no es lo mismo. No, no, no, no es lo mismo. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no
Speaker 0: mejor entiendan el tema es nuestro ministro de justicia, Mariano Acuña Olivarona.
Speaker 1: Él va a seguir toda la la la estrategia judicial, entre comillas.
Speaker 0: Digamos, bueno, es el ministro de justicia, o sea, digamos, es el que entiende de de esta obra.
Speaker 1: No, pero como es un tema en el cual estás, participaste vos como ciudadano, además como presidente, por eso te lo pregunto.
Speaker 0: Pero de vuelta. Es bueno que lo señeles como ciudadano, porque tuitees desde mi cuenta personal.
Speaker 1: Pero ya te diste cuenta que no, que sos presidente. Bueno.
Speaker 0: Porque lo dijiste antes. Pero sí, pero mi cuenta es mi cuenta personal. Está bien, pero sos el presidente. Fijate que dice mi cuenta de Twitter,
Speaker 1: Abrilla. Economista, sí, ya sé. Ok. Pero sos el presidente. Sí.
¿Qué? ¿Con esa parte? Sí, no sé cómo no sé cómo venía. Bueno, ok, ok. Sí, sí, sí, estoy que sí, yo sé porque por el juicio.
Sí.
Speaker 0: Claro. Claro. Claro, sí, obvio.
Speaker 1: Sí, yo yo entiendo, me di, me doy cuenta, te te puede tranquilo judicial.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Meanwhile on Israeli TV: "It's true, they are extremists and Al-Qaeda but they are better because Assad was arming Hezbollah" "We have occupied Lebanon, Syria, soon we'll reach your family in Baghdad." https://t.co/86ic3vrXkT
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
"Their plan is to remove Lebanon and Syria so that the borders of so-called Israel are with Turkey rather than with Arab countries. You will see this achieved, if not in our era, then in our children's era... Syria will become 5 small states." — GADDAFI https://t.co/sAqNOCkX5B
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
10 minutes of Lukashenko mauling the BBC https://t.co/6bILzQlsRR
reSee.it AI Summary
According to Prof. Michael Hudson, Western civilization has a blind spot regarding the true origins of civilization and the economic dynamics that have led to the polarization of Western economies. He argues that canceling interest-bearing debt was a regular practice in ancient times to restore economic order. This understanding challenges the modern myth of an automatic self-correcting economy. Prof. Hudson also points out that China's success can be attributed to its centralized approach to money creation, debt creation, banking, and credit as a public utility, similar to ancient societies.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Prof. Michael Hudson: "There's a blind spot in Western civilization, not only of how civilization really began in the ancient near East and then diffused, but also about the basic dynamic that has polarized western economies and is leading today to the western economies polarizing just in the way that Rome's empire ended in a dark age." "The regular need to cancel interest-bearing debt was woven into the beginning of civilization... this idea of restoring economic order was based on the understanding that there's no automatic self-correcting economy, which is the myth of modern time that is promulgated by oligarchs" "Once you realize that, you realize that today, why is it that China is pulling ahead? Because it centralized money creation, debt creation, banking and credit as a public utility, which is how it was all over ancient society."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Debt originated in ancient Near East with periodic debt cancellations by rulers to prevent societal collapse. Interest-bearing debt and debt cancellations were common practices. The transition to Europe occurred around 1200 BC, leading to debt bondage and land loss. Greece and Rome faced similar issues, with revolutions and debt cancellations. The need for a central authority to cancel debts and prevent oligarchy is highlighted. Western civilization's neglect of ancient economic principles has led to economic polarization. China's centralized approach to money creation mirrors ancient practices, contributing to its economic success. The lack of economic history education perpetuates flawed economic models based on neoliberalism and libertarianism.
Translation: Debt originated in ancient Near East with periodic debt cancellations by rulers to prevent societal collapse. Interest-bearing debt and debt cancellations were common practices. The transition to Europe occurred around 1200 BC, leading to debt bondage and land loss. Greece and Rome faced similar issues, with revolutions and debt cancellations. The need for a central authority to cancel debts and prevent oligarchy is highlighted. Western civilization's neglect of ancient economic principles has led to economic polarization. China's centralized approach to money creation mirrors ancient practices, contributing to its economic success. The lack of economic history education perpetuates flawed economic models based on neoliberalism and libertarianism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How did debt begin? How why is it that when we have the first interest charges, society, the rulers decided, okay, we're going to have interest, but we know that there's going to be a collapse periodically. If you read Hammurabi's laws, he knew that there were go going to be a droughts or floods. So, one of Hammurabi's laws said when the storm god, Adad, hits, there's going to be a debt cancellation, and, you don't have to pay the personal agrarian debts. How is it that almost all of the modern, economic practices, weights and measures, the equivalent of coinage, metallic weighed pieces of metal that were used for money, account keeping, interest charges, contract.
All of these developed in the ancient Near East, but almost all of the histories look at western civilization as beginning in Greece and Rome and instead of, much earlier in the ancient Near East. Everybody acknowledge the need to cancel debts, Every new king, when they would take the throne of Hammurabi's dynasty and the Sumerian rulers before him in the 3rd millennium, every new king would begin rule with a clean slate, re restoring a debt free status quo ante. They would, do what became literally the jubilee year, in the, Jewish bible, Leviticus 25. They would, cancel the personal debts that were due. Not the business debt, that were denominated in silver, but the grain debts that, farmers, owed.
They would liberate the debtors who'd been reduced to bondage, and they would return the land that had been forfeited to creditors, so that you would have a self supporting independent army of cultivators to be there. If you cancel the debts, how are you going to get creditors to make loans again? Well, the answer was that most credits were owed to the palace and to the temples, and it's easier to, cancel debts if they're due to you as, China's government knows. That's why China doesn't have the kind of debt problem that America has. It can write down the debts and not drive companies bankrupt, not drive a financial class, broke, and not die drive the banks broke because the debts are owed to China and it didn't create as much money as it wants.
Interest bearing debt and the regular need to cancel these debts were woven into the beginning of civilization. This lasted from about maybe, let's say, 25 100 BC, the, in records. The earliest records we have are debt cancellations, by, Enmatina of, so, Lagash, a port city in in Sumer. Well, this lasted down till about 1200 BC and even end of the 1st millennium. The Assyrians canceled the debts.
The Babylonians in the 1st millennium canceled the deaths. Well, there, but then there was bad weather around 1200 BC, and there was a dark age over the the from the Near East to, to Europe. The the Greek palace economies, lost record keeping. There was a population shrinkage, and depopulation. And, it took about 4 or 5 centuries for trade to resume.
And, in the 8th century BC, finally, you had Phoenician traders, and, other near eastern traders, beginning to move and trade with the the Aegean and the Mediterranean, and they brought the practice of interest bearing debt to Europe. The local chieftains, had the idea of chieftainship, but they didn't have the idea of, what archaeologists call divine kingship, that you had in the near east. They didn't have a central authority that, had a pledge to obey the gods of justice and, cancel the debts when a new ruler came into being. And very rapidly, you had, the, interest bearing debt reduce the population to bondage and losing the land. And all throughout Greece, there were revolutions in the Isthmus of Greece.
You had the the so called tyrants, meaning populists, overthrowing the aristocracy, canceling the debts, and redistributing the land. You had the same thing happen in Sparta, where they not only canceled the debts, they went so far as to ban money as well as to ban interest by the entire frame of Plato's Republic, which, it might be relevant for our discussion. Please. It it began where, Socrates is talking to, an Athenian. He was complaining about, the fact that I, he he has to, pay a debt, to somebody.
Socrates said, well, you know, do you really have to repay something you borrowed? Socrates says, well, let's then, talk about, this, debt that you owe. Suppose, you, give the money back to the creditor, and the creditor uses this money to lend to other people, and, he lends to a poor cultivator, and the cultivator ends up having to work off the debt by working on his the, the creditors' land, not on his own land. And suppose that the creditors get together and they take over society and, all of a sudden they're running the government and, they're exploiting society and, it's a crisis. Is it right that you should repay these people?
Well, that's the framework and the and, Socrates says the problem. The Athenian says, well, you know, why would, creditors act in so self destructive way? Can we just have a really, smart, rulers, that are going to prevent this kind of crisis? And Socrates says, well, there's something about the, mentality of wealthy people that's called wealth addiction or money love. Aristophanes writes plays about, wealth addiction and hubris, causing a a downfall.
And Socrates says it's really very much like hubris. They they, can't help, but, just wanting more and more. It's not Socrates explained that the whole basis of modern, neoclassical trade theory is absolutely wrong. Neoclassical trade theory says when you get more, bananas, you get satiated and each new banana gives you less and less pressure, pleasure, and so you wanna drop drop it. But, Aristophanes and Socrates and the whole of Athenian, drama and philosophy in the 4th century, said love of money is not like eating bananas.
Money, un, unlike food, money is addictive. And, the the wealthy class Socrates says they're going to get so addictive that they're going to just pursue their self interest and greed of their money love to destroy society. And the, Athenian says, well, you know, isn't there something you know, there must be some way. How do we get out of this trap? And Socrates said, well, for one thing, you're going to have to have a very special kind of ruler.
You're not gonna want to pick your ruler from the rich families, because if they come from the rich family, they're gonna grow up with wealth addiction, with money addiction. Either you're going to have to have the ideal ruler, not have, a a wealth of his own. And he described, you know, how do you get somebody that's freed from this, debt this creditor disease? That's what the republic's all about. Not a word for that did I ever get at Chicago.
They're all for the creditors. Of course, they're that it was called Rockefeller University, John d Rockefeller, endowed it as a baptist college. The Athenians and the Spartans and, almost all the Greeks, realized was you have to have some way of canceling the debts, but that requires a political system that, does not let an oligarchy develop. In in Rome, you had, the votes waited pretty much like it is in the United States. The the rich people's votes were, worth maybe 10 to a 100 times as many votes as the the lower people.
They had organized, by wealth class. Just like in America, it's the donor class that decides who to how much money to give to, the political candidates and whoever can give the most money for them to buy television time and pay bribes and, get their judges in control, win. So we're in exactly the same kind of oligarchy. So Greece, Rome, and I all the way down to modern society have never solved the problem that the ancient near eastern rulers did. Hammurabi, the Sumerians, the the, Assyrians, all over the near of the it turns out that, in order to have what, is economic democracy, liberty, freedom from, having to run so deeply into debt that you end up working off your debt to the creditor class, the only way is to have a central authority figure who's pledged to cancel the debts owed to the, creditor, oligarchy.
Well, that seems unthinkable today. They call it socialism and of course that is socialism. Even, in Greece you had a military manual, written by a man called Tacticus, and he wrote a book about the defense of cities and the attack of cities. And he said, how do you how does the general attack a city? What's the tactic?
Well, the first thing he said was you promised the citizens you gotta cancel their debts. They gotta come over to your side. And then said, how do you defend the city against the general attacking? You promised us citizens you gotta cancel the debts. You may or may not free some of the slaves, but you certainly free the debt bondsman.
All of this was, woven into the very fabric of the ancient mentality. The this idea of restoring economic order was based on the understanding that, there's no automatic self correcting economy, which is the myth of modern time that is, promulgated, by, oligarchs who want to destabilize the economy. But if they know that if they can convince you that whatever is happening is a natural process of economy stabilizing by giving them all the money and impoverishing the 90%, then you're not gonna do anything about it. There's a book from Plato to NATO, that shows how the reconstruction, the fake history of antiquity, the fake history, of, the Greek and Roman philosophy, was all meant to wipe out the context for what was this philosophy all about? What were the social problems they were dealing with?
And if they realize that the natural tendency of economies is to polarize and to become unstable, then you need a deus ex machina. You need someone, a ruler from without, to override it and say, okay. We're right, we're not going to sacrifice the economy, polarize it, and bring on a dark age just because we support the idea that all debts must be paid. It's more important that society as a whole survive than that the richest 1% of the population gets even richer by impoverishing the 99%. And that that turns out to be the first, of 3000 years of, ancient philosophy.
Not a word in western civilization. There's, this myth that western civilization begins with, taking all of this, economic and financial, and social context, into a a new context without any of this. And, in the Greek and Roman oligarchies as if the oligarchy founded civilization instead of did everything they could to destroy it. And once you realize that, you realize it today. Why is it that China is pulling ahead, in, because, it's centralized the, money creation, debt creation, banking and credit as a public utility, which it was in Sumer, Babylonia, Assyria, you know, all over, ancient, ancient, society.
You one it's a whole different concept of how you structure society. Well, I guess to you that would be a philosophical problem. To me it was an economic problem except there's, there's no role in the economics curriculum to introduce it because they no longer teach economic history and they no longer teach debt. The economic models are all based a silver owned barter. How does the economy work with it's just everything is up to trade in the market, without looking at well, what shapes the market?
You had a market in 3rd millennium BC. Every economy, somebody has a market, but the economists say, no. No. The only market is where there's no government intervention, no government oversight of weights and measures, no government prevention of monopoly, no government concern for the common idea. Well, this is a right wing, philosophy and quite frankly, it's neofascist and, that's called neoliberalism today, or even even worse, libertarianism.
The idea of libertarians is you need a centralized economy, centrally planned economy. But the centrally planners are going to be on Wall Street, not in the government. You have to have it all in the private sector. The banks will be the, the planners. You can't have any regulation of the banks.
Let them, go ahead and impoverish everybody. The, the neoliberals and the libertarians are on the far right wing oligarchic, part of the spectrum, and the socialists have somehow not picked up on this. The socialist parties of Europe have all endorsed neoliberalism, as if somehow it's technological. And so there's really a blind spot in Western civilization, not only of how civilization really began in the ancient near east and diffused, but what the basic dynamic is that has polarized western economies and is, leading today to the Western economies polarizing just in this in the way that, the that, Rome's empire ended in a dark age.
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Napolitano shared a conversation with Trump about releasing JFK assassination records. Trump mentioned being shown something that would make Napolitano hesitant to release them. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs believes that since Kennedy's assassination, presidents have only acted as figureheads for the system.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Judge Napolitano: "I told Trump, 'you promised you would release the records of the JFK assassination.' He said to me 'If they showed you what they showed me, you wouldn't have released it either.' I said 'Who's they? What did they show you?' Trump said "Someday when we're not on the phone and there aren't 15 people listening to the call, I'll tell you.'" Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: "It has been said that after the Kennedy assassination, there has been no president. They have only been factotums of the system since then."
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump consulted with me about pardons and sentences before leaving office. He expressed doubts about the election results, claiming he saw evidence that would change my mind. He hinted at confidential information but didn't elaborate. The conversation raised questions about who was influencing him. The discussion led to speculation about the impact of JFK's assassination on subsequent presidents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In my last conversation with president Trump in the White House, he called me a lot, and this is after January 6th. So it's 2 weeks before or a week before he's leaving office. He wanted to run past me, my the names of people he was gonna pardon and sentences he was gonna commit. He wanted my opinion on them. Some of them I knew.
I said, how are you doing? He said, not too well, and he went off into a tangent about what he thought happened with the election. I said, you know, you made a promise to the public many times and to me privately that you haven't He said to me, judge, if they showed you what they showed me, you wouldn't have released it either. And I said, who's they, and what did they show you? And then he said, judge, someday when we're on the phone, and then he raised his voice.
And there aren't 15 people listening to the phone call back to a normal voice, I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: I mean, this makes it sound even worse. Who are they? Probably somebody in the intelligence community. What did they show him? JFK's brain's blown out?
Speaker 1: This is it. You know, it it it was said by, one person that after the Kennedy assassination, there has been no president. They have only been factotums of the system since then. And, it, it, it may well be the most decisive event in modern American history.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Proud Israeli war criminals showcase their carnage https://t.co/FqoQw3pBsE
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
"Was Navalny an intelligence asset of MI6 or CIA, or both?" Scott Ritter: "Both... we tried to put lipstick on this pig and turn him into the symbol of democracy, but he was never a democrat. He was always a disruptive force, trained, funded and directed by the CIA." https://t.co/zzpuef6QPQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Navalny was groomed by the CIA during a Yale internship and supported by British intelligence. He participated in coup attempts against Putin in 2007, 2008, and 2012. Navalny made derogatory remarks about people from the Caucasus and Georgians. Despite being portrayed as a symbol of democracy, he was a nationalist and disruptive force, not a true democrat. Navalny never had significant national support and was used by the CIA to undermine the Russian government. Ultimately, he was labeled as a traitor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was Navalny, an intelligence asset of Mi 6 OR CIA OR both? Both. Navalny was a political operative. He was groomed by the CIA during a Yale, internship. He was supported in Moscow by a network of nongovernmental organizations and other entities who received, money covertly from British intelligence.
He participated in 3 coup attempts against, against Vladimir Putin. The first one was the elections of 2,007, 2008, where the United States attempted to carry out a color revolution to prevent, the swap that Putin and, and and and Dmitry Medvedev were making where Putin was basically run had served two terms, was gonna switch over to prime minister. Medvedev would become president, and then at the end, they'd switch back. That was the goal. This United States tried to disrupt this to prevent that from happening by carrying out a color revolution where Navalny played an important role.
Then after that failed, Navalny got selected for this Yale program, which is really nothing more than a front for the national resources division of the CIA to groom, train, recruit, and then deploy him. He got deployed back for the purpose of, disrupting Vladimir Putin's attempt to return to power in 2,012. We have Navalny's deputy on film with British intelligence saying I need treason. So, you know, that's what, Navalny did. And then Navalny, got involved in trying to disrupt the the 2021, effort, as well.
This, you know, this led to well, this is Navalny is the great, nationalist. Here he's comparing people from the the the Caucasus as cockroaches and, and, flies. He says that, the way you deal with cockroaches and flies is with the fly swaddered slippers, but but sometimes you have bigger pests. And then a Muslim comes in and he shoots them. He says the solution is the the handgun.
He called Georgians. My wife is from the Republic of Georgia. He called them rodents. Rodents. My wife is not a rodent.
Her family isn't rodents. Georgians aren't rodents. Duvallini is an ugly nationalist. That's the reality. Now we tried to put lipstick on this pig and turn him into, you know, the symbol of democracy, but he was never a Democrat.
He was always a disruptive force trained, funded, and directed by the CIA, to undermine, Russian government, not undermine Russian democracy. Nothing about Navalny was democratic. He never garnered more than 5% support nationally. He could never have won an election. His job was to be disruptive, purely disruptive.
And in that, he did a good job, but he was a traitor nonetheless.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
"Your great grandchildren are going to look back on your support for Israel just the same way that you look back on pictures of lynchings and those postcards of black babies being eaten by alligators in front of tourists." https://t.co/i9Mm0lwXs7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes western supremacy and accuses it of committing genocide in Gaza. They argue that the global south, including the BRICS nations, is working towards peace while the west escalates the situation. The speaker believes this is a showdown between western supremacy and the civilized world. They claim that the west has a history of brutality and oppression, and if current generations support Israel's actions, they will be disavowed by future generations. The speaker concludes by suggesting that the power of the west will diminish in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's western supremacy, colonialist imperialist supremacy that's being confronted. That's what's being confronted in Gaza. It's western colonialist imperialist supremacy that's committing genocide in Gaza right now. Everyone in the world is against you. Everyone in the global south.
Gaza is a microcosm of centuries of anti colonialist struggle. The entire global south, the BRICS nations, all called for a ceasefire. The whole global south is undertaking frantic diplomacy, trying to bring peace and an end to the carnage in Gaza. And who's against that? The west, as always.
America tells everyone, don't escalate. Meanwhile, They're sending warships, and they're sending special forces to Israel. They say don't escalate. Wow. They are escalating.
I'm telling you, this is showdown now. It's a showdown, not between and the Israelis, not between Palestine and Israel, not between the Arabs and the Jews or the Muslims and the Jews. It's a showdown between Savage western supremacy and the civilized world because you wanted to pivot to the global south. You wanted to transition the global economy. But you're sick.
Your power man. You can't stand for anyone to be genuinely free from your control. Anyone's freedom anywhere is a threat to your supremacy everywhere. You reserve the right to be brutal and vicious as a god given entitlement. It's a truth that you hold to be self evident.
Every generation in the west always says that They are different. They always say that they've changed, that they're not like their forefathers, but they do all the same things all over again every time. There's no change. They've never changed. Maybe you're a Westerner now, and you're horrified by the things that your society did in the past.
Or you're doing the same things now, and it doesn't horrify you. No. You could see all those old pictures of people having picnics with their families in the American South, having sandwiches under the swinging bodies of black people who they just lynched. Maybe you see those pictures. This generation, you see those pictures and you're bewildered at how human beings could be so brutal.
But right now, tonight, you're sitting in front of the television watching CNN and eating pizza, watching a genocide take place in Gaza, or you're no better than the generations before you. You're just the same. And your great grandchildren are gonna look back on your support for Israel just the same way that you look back on pictures of lynchings and those postcards of black babies being eaten by alligators in front of tourists. And they'll disavow you and your whole generation as evil and inhuman just like you disavow those evil and inhuman generations before you. But just like you, they will only be disavowing the previous evil to obscure the evil that they will be doing in their generation because you never change.
But by that time, insha'allah b I zhnila, your great grandchildren's generation won't have any power.
reSee.it AI Summary
Russian President Putin accuses the US and its allies of fueling conflicts worldwide, including in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. He claims they install military bases, use force without pretext, and sow chaos in the Middle East. Putin criticizes their lack of interest in lasting peace and emphasizes Russia's consistent stance, advocating for an independent Palestinian state as the key to resolving the conflict.
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
PUTIN: "I will repeat again: the ruling elites of the United States and its satellites are behind the tragedy of the Palestinians, the massacre in the Middle East in general, the conflict in Ukraine, and many other conflicts in the world – in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and so on. This has become obvious to everyone. It is they who install their military bases everywhere, who use military force on every pretext and without any pretext, who send weapons to conflict areas. They are also channeling financial resources, including to Ukraine and the Middle East, and fueling hatred in Ukraine and the Middle East. They are not achieving results on the battlefield, so they want to split us from within, as far as Russia is concerned, to weaken us and sow confusion. They do not want Russia to participate in solving any international or regional problems, including in the Middle East settlement. They are not satisfied at all when someone does not act or speak exactly as they are instructed. They believe only in their own exclusivity, in being allowed to do anything. They do not need durable peace in the Holy Land; they need constant chaos in the Middle East. Consequently, they are trying hard to discredit countries that are insisting on an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, on ending the bloodshed, and that are ready to make a real contribution to resolving the crisis, rather than parasitizing on it. They are even attacking, ostracizing and trying to discredit the UN and the clear position of the global community. I would like to note that, unlike the West, our approaches towards the situation in the Middle East have always lacked mercenary interests, intrigues and double standards. We have stated and continue to openly state our position, which does not change every year. The key to resolving the conflict lies in establishing a sovereign and independent Palestinian state, a full-fledged Palestinian state."
@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷
Cell phone video of DC officer on January 6 saying “we go undercover as Antifa in the crowd” How many cops & federal agents were undercover that day?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks someone to put back an item while they are undercover in an antique store. They express gratitude and ask if everyone feels better after being sprayed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, geez. When we go undercover his antiques in the crap, can you put that back in? Alright. Thank you so much. Yep.
It feels better? You guys get sprayed? Here. Here.