TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @valjtb

Posted - September 26, 2023 at 11:12 AM

Saved - September 26, 2023 at 2:07 PM

@valjtb - Val

O geólogo Prof. Ian Plimer: "Ninguém jamais demonstrou que as emissões humanas de dióxido de carbono provocam o aquecimento global... E se isso pudesse ser demonstrado, então teríamos de mostrar que 97% das emissões que são naturais não provocam o aquecimento global." Dublado

Video Transcript AI Summary

I don't have opinions, only demonstrable facts. No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. If it could be demonstrated, then we would have to show that 97% of emissions, which are natural, do not cause global warming. This is a scientific fraud from day one. We have known for 200 years through chemistry that it is the opposite. When we drill ice cores, we can see chemical fingerprints that tell us the temperature and show that when there was natural warming, there was an increase in carbon dioxide. It's not carbon dioxide that drives temperature, it's the reverse. Another fraud.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Eu não tenho opiniões. Eu tenho fotos demonstráveis. Esses fatos são validados e são repetíveis. Fato número Ninguém jamais demonstrou que as emissões humanas de Dioxida de carbono impulsionam o aquecimento global. Nunca foi mostrado. E se isso pudesse ser demonstrado, então teríamos de mostrar que noventa e sete por cento das emissões, que são naturais, não provocam o aquecimento global. Game over. Estamos lidando com uma fraude. Isso é uma fraude científica desde o primeiro dia. Ouvimos a propaganda de que o aumento do gás da vida, gás residual na atmosfera trará desastre e que teremos aquecimento global descontrolado. Desculpe, pessoal, sabemos há duzentos anos pela química que é exatamente o inverso. Agora, tenho certeza que alguns de vocês tentaram isso ontem à noite no jantar com champanhe ou cerveja e se esqueceram de beber, E esquentou, e continuou borbulhando e borbulhando e borbulhando e borbulhando e isso é o inverso solubilidade do dióxido de carbono. Sabemos disso há duzentos anos. Vemos isso nos núcleos de gelo. Quando perfuramos o gelo, Temos impressões digitais químicas que nos dizem qual era a temperatura e temos pequenos pedaços que ficam presos no ar. E podemos mostrar que quando tivemos aquecimento natural, cerca de seiscentos e cinquenta seis mil anos depois, tivemos aumento no dióxido de carbono. Não é o dióxido de carbono que impulsiona a temperatura é o ziguezague inverso. Outra fraude.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

"Game over. We are dealing with a fraud". Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer, exposes the monumental fraud that is "human-induced global warming", in just two minutes: "No one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming… And if it could be shown,…

Video Transcript AI Summary

Human emissions of carbon dioxide driving global warming has never been proven. To do so, it would also need to be shown that the 97% of natural emissions do not contribute to global warming. This is a scientific fraud. The belief that increased levels of carbon dioxide will lead to disaster and runaway global warming is propaganda. Chemistry has shown for 200 years that carbon dioxide has an inverse solubility, meaning it warms up when not dissolved. Ice cores reveal that increases in carbon dioxide follow natural warming, indicating that temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around. This is another fraudulent claim.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I don't have opinions. I have demonstrable facts. These facts are validated, and these facts are repeatable. Fact number 1, no one has ever shown that human emissions of carbon dioxide Drive global warming. Never been shown. And if it could be shown, Then you would have to show that the 97% of emissions, which are natural, do not drive global warming. Game over. We are dealing with a fraud. It's a scientific fraud from day 1. We hear the propaganda that increases of the gas of life, a trace gas in the atmosphere, we'll bring a disaster and that we will have runaway global warming. Sorry, folks. We've known for 200 years from chemistry that it's the exact inverse. Now I'm sure some of you tried this last night at the dinner with a champagne Or a beer, and you forgot to drink it, and it warmed up, and it kept bubbling and bubbling and bubbling and bubbling. And that is the inverse solubility of carbon dioxide. We've known that for 200 years. We see it from the ice cores. When we drill into ice, We have chemical fingerprints that tell us what the temperature was, and we have little bits of trapped air. And we can show that when we had natural warming, Some 650 to 6000 years later, we had an increase in carbon dioxide. It's not carbon dioxide that drives temperature. It's Sig Zact Inverse, another fraud.