TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @wikileaks

Saved - March 13, 2026 at 1:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 1947 unearthed letter to Eleanor Roosevelt, I compare Zionists to Hitler and Stalin, warning that US Zionists will prejudice everyone against them; Jews are like underdogs who, when on top, become as intolerant and cruel as their former oppressors.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

President Truman in unearthed letter to Eleanor Roosevelt and separate note (both 1947) compares Zionists to Hitler & Stalin: “US Zionists will eventually prejudice everyone [against them]... Jews are like all under dogs - when they get on top they are just as intolerant and as cruel as the people were to them when they were underneath.”

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Full quote: “The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as DP [displaced persons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political, neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog.” Handwritten note by President Harry S. Truman dated July 21, 1947, summarising remarks made during a meeting with former Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. Source: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/5859986?objectPage=3

Saved - January 9, 2026 at 12:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer visited Palantir’s Washington HQ and met Louis Mosley, grandson of Oswald Mosley. The talks signal Palantir’s deepening role in NHS data systems and British military AI. Mosley warned that powerful tools can be dangerous in the wrong hands but good in the right hands. Palantir has supplied Israel with AI surveillance and targeting tech, and co-founder Alex Karp called these systems crucial to Israeli operations.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer recently visited Palantir’s headquarters in Washington, DC, where he met with Louis Mosley — head of Palantir UK and grandson of British fascist leader Oswald Mosley. As Palantir deepens its role in NHS data systems and British military AI, the meeting signalled the growing relationship between the UK government and the tech firm. “You could see in his eyes that he gets it,” Mosley said of Starmer’s embrace of AI. “It’s a constant reminder of: you’re building a very, very powerful tool, and in the wrong hands, very powerful tools can be extremely dangerous. But in the right hands, they can be used to do extraordinarily good things.” Palantir has supplied Israel with AI-powered surveillance and targeting technology during its war on Gaza — tools used to identify and strike homes and moving vehicles. Palantir co-founder Alex Karp has called Palantir’s systems “crucial” to Israeli military operations.

Saved - December 18, 2025 at 10:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I filed a criminal complaint in Sweden against 30 Nobel Foundation associates, alleging misappropriation, facilitation of war crimes, and crimes against humanity tied to a pending 11 million SEK Nobel prize transfer to Maria Corina Machado. I claim Nobel funds are being diverted from Nobel’s will to war. I seek a freeze, investigations, seizure of records, and possible ICC referral, arguing Machado’s actions disqualify her from the prize.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

JULIAN ASSANGE FILES CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NOBEL FOUNDATION OVER “INSTRUMENT OF WAR” PEACE PRIZE WikiLeaks Founder Alleges 2025 Award to María Corina Machado Constitutes Misappropriation, Facilitation of War Crimes Under Swedish Law, Seeks Freeze of 11 million SEK ($1.18 million USD) of Pending Transfers to Machado STOCKHOLM — 11:00am CET December 17, 2025 Julian Assange today filed a criminal complaint in Sweden accusing 30 individuals associated with the Nobel Foundation, including its leadership, of committing serious suspected crimes, including the crime of gross misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the financing of the crime of aggression. The complaint shows that Alfred Nobel's 1895 will explicitly mandates that the peace prize go to the individual who during the proceeding year “conferred the greatest benefit to humankind” by doing “the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” Assange argues that “The political decision of the Norwegian selection committee does not suspend the fiduciary duty of Swedish funds administrators”. “Any disbursement contradicting this mandate constitutes misappropriation from the endowment”. The complaint, submitted simultaneously to the Swedish Economic Crime Authority (Ekobrottsmyndigheten) and the Swedish War Crimes Unit (Krigsbrottsenheten), states that the suspects, including Nobel Foundation Chair Astrid Söderbergh Widding and Executive Director Hanna Stjärne, converted “an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” through suspected “serious criminality” including: 1) Breach of trust, gross misappropriation and conspiracy in relation to the pending 11 million SEK ($1.18 million) disbursement of the Peace prize monies to Maria Corina Machado, whose prior and ongoing actions categorically exclude her from the criteria set out in Alfred Nobel's will; 2) Facilitation of war crimes, including the crime of aggression and crimes against humanity, breaching Sweden's obligations under Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute, because the accused are aware of Machado's incitement and endorsement of the U.S. commission of international crimes, and knew or ought to have known that the disbursement of Nobel monies would contribute to extrajudicial killings of civilians and shipwrecked survivors at sea and are in breach of their obligation to cease disbursements. Assange notes that the members of the Nobel Foundation have previously exercised their supervisory authority over the prizes and their disbursements by withholding Literature Prize disbursements in 2018. “Failure to intervene here, despite U.S. war crimes off the Venezuelan coast and Machado’s key role in furthering aggression” incurs criminal liability. “Alfred Nobel's endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange states. The accused have concrete legal obligations because they are tasked with “ensuring the fulfillment of the intended purpose of Alfred Nobel’s will, that is, to end wars and war crimes, and not to enable them.” MACHADO'S INCITEMENT OF THE LARGEST U.S. MILITARY BUILDUP SINCE THE IRAQ WAR MAKE HER CATEGORICALLY INELIGIBLE The complaint notes how the Nobel announcement and ceremony have occurred in what military analysts describe as “the largest U.S. military deployment in the Caribbean since the Cuban Missile Crisis”—now exceeding 15,000 personnel, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford. The escalation continues as President Trump announced on December 10, two days after the Nobel ceremony, that U.S. strikes would be “starting by land.” The Venezuela strategy is part of what Trump’s Secretary for War, Peter Hegseth, calls a shift toward “maximum lethality, not tepid legality” and “going on the offence”. Against this backdrop, Assange states that “Machado has continued to incite the Trump Administration to pursue its escalatory path”, including by entering into a conspiracy to give the U.S. administration access to $1.7 trillion in oil reserves and other natural resources through privatization once Maduro is ousted. “Using her elevated position as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favour of war, facilitated by the named suspects.” Assange states in the criminal complaint. The complaint lists evidence of this incitement of U.S. military intervention, as well as praising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct in Gaza. Her statements include: - “Military escalation may be the only way... the United States may need to intervene directly” (30 October 2025) - Machado called U.S. military strikes on civilian vessels, which have killed at least 95 people to date, “justified” and “visionary”. - Machado dedicated the prize to U.S. President Trump, because he “finally has put Venezuela... in terms of a priority for the United States national security” - Historical statements including 2014 testimony before U.S. Congress where she said: “The only path left is the use of force” The filing cites extensive third-party expert and institutional opposition to Machado receiving the award: - 21 Norwegian peace organizations declared: “Machado is the opposite of a peace laureate.” - Nobel Peace Prize laureate Adolfo Pérez Esquivel stated: “Giving the prize to someone who calls for foreign invasion is a mockery of Alfred Nobel's will.” - The Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO) confirmed Machado “has called for military intervention in Venezuela.” REQUESTED ACTION The complaint notes that “There is a real risk that the funds derived from Nobel’s endowment have been or will be intentionally or negligently diverted from their charitable purpose to facilitate aggression, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.” Assange requests that Swedish authorities: 1. Immediately freeze of the pending SEK 11,000,000 monetary prize transfer and any remaining related budget and secure return of the medal. 2. Investigate the named persons and Foundation officers and associated entities for breach of trust, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and conspiracy. 3. Seize of board minutes, emails, group chats, financial records. 4. Interrogate Widding, Stjärne and other suspects. 5. Fully investigate domestically or refer the matter to the ICC (Rome Statute Art. 25(3)(c)). “This complaint seeks the immediate freezing of all remaining funds and a full criminal investigation lest the Nobel Peace Prize be permanently converted from an instrument of peace into an instrument of war,” Assange concludes.

Saved - October 18, 2025 at 7:18 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

John Bolton called for Assange, Snowden and Manning to be executed under the Espionage Act, for communicating true information to the public. Now Bolton faces 18 counts under the Espionage Act for mishandling national defense information. https://t.co/pr0H7pkfUL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that Snowden, if he comes to the United States, should receive due process and be punished severely, stating he hopes he gets at least 176 years in jail for what he did. He asserts that crimes like espionage harm the security and safety of innocent American civilians and deserves the strictest punishment. He states his view that Snowden committed treason, ought to be convicted of that, and ought to swing from a tall oak tree. He adds that he believes Snowden should be prosecuted, and if found guilty, punished to the fullest extent possible. When asked what that punishment is, Speaker 0 answers: Death. Speaker 1 asks if he thinks Snowden should be killed, and Speaker 0 confirms: Yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He gets to The United States. He'll get due process here, and I hope he gets at least a hundred and seventy six years in jail for what he did. I'm not bothered by the death penalty in this country, and I think, crimes like espionage that harm the security and the safety of innocent American civilians deserves the strictest punishment. View is that Snowden committed treason. He ought to be convicted of that, and then he ought to swing from a tall oak tree. Well, he should be prosecuted. And if he's found guilty, he should be punished to the fullest extent possible. Speaker 1: And what is that? Speaker 0: Death. Speaker 1: You think he should be killed? Speaker 0: Yes.
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 8:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the Israeli government is investing heavily in social media influence, paying US content creators up to $7,000 per post to promote pro-Israel messaging. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to counter declining public support amid ongoing tensions in Gaza. The campaign, which includes significant funding for influencer recruitment and training, reflects a shift towards using digital platforms as a battleground for public opinion. Notably, former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale is involved, utilizing AI to enhance communication strategies.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

$7000 per post: Israel paying undisclosed US influencers amid Gaza backlash The Israeli government is paying US content producers up to $7000 per post as part of a major increase in budget for global influence campaigns. “We have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we engage, and the most important ones are on social media,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a group of US-based Jewish influencers in New York this week. A September 2025 filing by Bridges partners LLC on behalf of 'Government of Israel through Havas Media Group' under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) details “Initial payments for production and influencers. Concept development with each influencer. Begin matching with Israeli content partners and writing initial post,” among other line items. More than half the $900,000 total appears to be allocated to the recruitment and training of a cohort of more than a dozen US-based online influencers expected to post pro-Israel content. The campaign is part of a larger influence push by Israeli authorities amid a collapse of public support in the US and elsewhere as the Gaza genocide draws into its third year. In late 2024, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar negotiated a 20-fold increase in the foreign influence budget, securing USD$150 million. Among other initiatives, Israel is now paying $1.5 million a month to President Donald Trump's former digital campaign strategist Brad Parscale to produce “strategic communications,” using AI tools to generate thousands of variants on pro-Israel messaging. Parscale is is now registered as a foreign agent. “We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers,” Netanyahu told the gathering in New York in September.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. The weapons change over time. You can't fight today with swords. You can't fight with cavalry. And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are in social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Five followers. TikTok. What? TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? X. X. X. Oh. That's Successful. Very good.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance to that, that community. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. You know, the the weapons change over time. You can't fight today with swords. That doesn't work very well. Okay? And you can't fight with the fight with cavalry. That doesn't work very well. And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. I won't get into that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are in social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Five followers. TikTok. What? TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? X. X. X. Oh. That's Successful. Very good.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Sources: Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post https://responsiblestatecraft.org/israel-influencers-netanyahu/ Exhibit A to Registration Statement Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (PDF) https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7652-Exhibit-AB-20250926-1.pdf Former Trump campaign manager registers to advocate for Israel https://www.axios.com/2025/09/30/brad-parscale-israel-charlie-kirk-maga ​​Israel’s secret ‘Esther Project’: DOJ filings reveal paid US influencer campaign amid AI-powered PR blitz https://forward.com/fast-forward/773059/pro-israel-influencers-esther-project/

Israel is paying influencers $7,000 per post Netanyahu referred this week to a 'community' pushing out preferred messaging in US media — and boy are they making a princely sum responsiblestatecraft.org
Former Trump campaign manager registers to advocate for Israel Israel has grown alarmed by the slip in support among young MAGA voters. axios.com
​​Israel’s secret ‘Esther Project’: DOJ filings reveal paid US influencer campaign amid AI-powered PR blitz As Netanyahu calls social media the “eighth front,” new documents reveal how Israel is paying to shape U.S. opinion. forward.com
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The White House is finalizing the forced sale of TikTok to a consortium led by Larry Ellison, a major donor to the IDF. Ellison, who has extensive media holdings, will control U.S. user data and the algorithm, which is set to be "retrained." Censorship of content critical of Israel has increased on TikTok as the sale approaches. Disapproval of Israel's actions in Gaza is rising among Americans. Meanwhile, decentralized platforms like Keet and Nostr offer alternatives to mainstream censorship, though they are still developing.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Israeli-Aligned Billionaires Seize TikTok in Battle for U.S. Narrative Control The White House has announced that the forced sale of TikTok will be finalized this week. The new ownership led by Larry Ellison - the largest individual donor to the IDF - will take control of U.S. user data and the algorithm which the White House says will be "retrained". Ellison, who made his fortune developing Oracle - a database system he originally built for the CIA - already controls CBS, Paramount, MTV, Comedy Central, Showtime, Nickelodeon (which makes kids shows) as well as Channel 10 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK. Ellison is also expected to finalize control over Warner Bros. Discovery (including CNN, HBO and the Discovery channel) before the end of 2025. Even before the forced sale is finalised, censorship of TikTok content critical of Israel, including of the deal itself, has reached extreme levels as the platform moves to align with its prospective new owners. Fox – a Murdoch asset - is also seeking to join the Ellison consortium, a move that could enable cross-promotion between Fox and TikTok, further tightening the Israeli-aligned information bubble. Disapproval of what Israel is doing in Gaza has risen to 60% of the US population, nearly double the approval rate of 32%. The U.S. still has over three years of Trump left. Israeli-aligned Jewish billionaires control OpenAI, Google, Meta/Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp, Palantir, CBS, HBO, and most of Conde Nast (Reddit, Vogue, The New Yorker, Wired, GQ, Vanity Fair) as well as numerous Hollywood studios, regional papers and radio stations. Europe, meanwhile, remains largely absent, offering little real competition in the information space. Its one real success story? Telegram, which it managed to comprehensively alienate after France arrested its founder, supposedly for not handing over enough user data. Will the EU and other U.S. allies align with the “Israelified” TikTok algorithm, or attempt to create a politicised alternative of their own? Decentralised alternatives like Keet and Nostr offer strong resistance to censorship but are still young. Larger platforms like Telegram and Rednote carry serious risks of censorship, including eventual sell-off to other interests. For users the sweet spot may be to use both. One for political reliability, the others for a (politically temporary) audience.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Online action is framed as equally decisive to offline action in future warfare. "We must, you must take this deadly seriously." "Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani River." "Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon." "Libelist tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen." "But this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline." The overall message is urgency and the equivalence of online and offline action in future conflicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must, you must take this deadly seriously. Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Litani River. Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon. Libelist tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen. But this is urgent because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Sources: Video: ADL CEO Jonathon Greenblatt speaks in the Knesset, 7 January 2025 Nostr: https://nostr.com/ Keet: https://keet.io/ Israel’s Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS https://just-international.org/articles/israels-biggest-us-donor-now-owns-cbs/ Larry Ellison Is A Billionaire Today Thanks To The CIA https://www.businessinsider.com/the-cia-made-larry-ellison-a-billionaire-2014-9 Trump says Larry Ellison, Michael Dell and Murdochs will be involved in TikTok deal https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/21/business/tiktok-trump-murdochs-oracle-deal Pro-Israel tech firm to take control of US TikTok algorithm https://thecradle.co/articles/pro-israel-tech-firm-to-take-control-of-us-tiktok-algorithm

Nostr - Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays nostr.com
Keet - The Peer to Peer Chat App The Peer to Peer Chat App keet.io
Israel’s Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS – Just International just-international.org
Larry Ellison Is A Billionaire Today Thanks To The CIA The CIA was the customer that launched Oracle, co-founder Larry Ellison said on stage Sunday night. businessinsider.com
Michael Dell, Murdochs will also be involved in TikTok deal, Trump says | CNN Business Tech and media giants Larry Ellison, Michael Dell and Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch will be a part of the group to take over TikTok’s algorithm in the acquisition of the social media platform’s US operations, President Donald Trump said on Sunday. edition.cnn.com
Pro-Israel tech firm to take control of US TikTok algorithm US President Trump and Chinese President Xi are close to a deal for Beijing to relinquish control of TikTok in the US thecradle.co
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The White House is set to finalize the forced sale of TikTok to a consortium led by Larry Ellison, a major donor to the IDF. Ellison, who has extensive media control, is expected to reshape TikTok's U.S. user data and algorithm. Censorship of content critical of Israel has intensified on the platform, coinciding with rising disapproval of Israel's actions in Gaza among Americans. Meanwhile, alternatives like Keet and Nostr offer resistance to censorship, but face challenges. The future of TikTok's algorithm raises questions about alignment with U.S. allies and the potential for politicized alternatives.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Israeli-Aligned Billionaires Seize TikTok in Battle for U.S. Narrative Control The White House has announced that the forced sale of TikTok will be finalized this week. The new ownership led by Larry Ellison - the largest individual donor to the IDF - will take control of U.S. user data and the algorithm which the White House says will be "retrained". Ellison, who made his fortune developing Oracle - a database system he originally built for the CIA - already controls CBS, Paramount, MTV, Comedy Central, Showtime, Nickelodeon (which makes kids shows) as well as Channel 10 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK. Ellison is also expected to finalize control over Warner Bros. Discovery (including CNN, HBO and the Discovery channel) before the end of 2025. Even before the forced sale is finalised, censorship of TikTok content critical of Israel, including of the deal itself, has reached extreme levels as the platform moves to align with its prospective new owners. Fox – a Murdoch asset - is also seeking to join the Ellison consortium, a move that could enable cross-promotion between Fox and TikTok, further tightening the Israeli-aligned information bubble. Disapproval of what Israel is doing in Gaza has risen to 60% of the US population, nearly double the approval rate of 32%. The U.S. still has over three years of Trump left. Israeli-aligned Jewish billionaires control OpenAI, Google, Meta/Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp, Palantir, CBS, HBO, and most of Conde Nast (Reddit, Vogue, The New Yorker, Wired, GQ, Vanity Fair) as well as numerous Hollywood studios, regional papers and radio stations. Europe, meanwhile, remains largely absent, offering little real competition in the information space. Its one real success story? Telegram, which it managed to comprehensively alienate after France arrested its founder, supposedly for not handing over enough user data. Will the EU and other U.S. allies align with the “Israelified” TikTok algorithm, or attempt to create a politicised alternative of their own? Decentralised alternatives like Keet and Nostr offer strong resistance to censorship but are still young. Larger platforms like Telegram and Rednote carry serious risks of censorship, including eventual sell-off to other interests. For users the sweet spot may be to use both. One for political reliability, the others for a (politically temporary) audience.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The renewal of the Jewish state, is is something that I I think touches all of us. For two thousand years, we were a stateless people. And now we have a country of our own, defended by all the brave men and women of the IDF." "I have been to Israel. I have been to the border. I have spent time to the people who govern the state of Israel. And, you know, I feel a deep a deep emotional connection to the state of Israel and the Israeli people." "We actually acquired a number of Israeli companies. We have two CEOs at Oracle. One's name is Safra Katz and she was born in Israel." "So again, we love the country love the country of Israel and we'll do everything we can to support the country of Israel." "But one thing we know for certain that the Israeli army did everything they could to minimize civilian casualties."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell us what is your connection to Israel? Speaker 1: Well, the renewal of the Jewish state, is is something that I I think touches all of us. For two thousand years, we were a stateless people. And now we have a country of our own, defended by all the brave men and women of the IDF. So anything we can do to support them who, you know, devote their lives for preserving the state of Israel, keeping the people safe, and allowing our state to continue in in very sometimes in very, very difficult situations. Did you visit this one? I've I have been to Israel. I have been to the border. I have spent time to the people who govern the state of Israel. And, you know, I feel a deep a deep emotional connection to the state of Israel and the Israeli people. Speaker 0: You are a high-tech person. What do you think about Israeli startups and high-tech phenomenon? Speaker 1: Oh, well, you know, after Silicon Valley, there's an area hurts Herzliya has probably got more startups than any other place other than Silicon Valley in Northern California. So there is we've actually acquired a number of Israeli companies. We have two CEOs at Oracle. One's name is Safra Katz and she was born in Israel. So again, we love the country love the country of Israel and we'll do everything we can to support the country of Israel. Speaker 0: Recently hear that many people criticizing Israel, especially after the Gaza operation. How do you feel if someone just say we love Israel so much? Speaker 1: Well, again, it's a difficult situation, isn't it? To conduct military operations around civilians is very is very difficult. And, of course, there were tragic tragedies, and civilians were, you know, were hurt. That's a terrible thing. But one thing we know for certain that the Israeli army did everything they could to minimize civilian casualties. In in that in that regard, they've done a much better job than a lot of other armies all over the world throughout history. Thank you very much.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Sources: Video by @decensorednews: Larry Ellison at “Friends of the IDF” gala in Beverly Hills, 2014 Nostr: https://nostr.com/ Keet: https://keet.io/ Israel’s Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS https://just-international.org/articles/israels-biggest-us-donor-now-owns-cbs/ Larry Ellison Is A Billionaire Today Thanks To The CIA https://www.businessinsider.com/the-cia-made-larry-ellison-a-billionaire-2014-9 Trump says Larry Ellison, Michael Dell and Murdochs will be involved in TikTok deal https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/21/business/tiktok-trump-murdochs-oracle-deal Pro-Israel tech firm to take control of US TikTok algorithm https://thecradle.co/articles/pro-israel-tech-firm-to-take-control-of-us-tiktok-algorithm

Nostr - Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays nostr.com
Keet - The Peer to Peer Chat App The Peer to Peer Chat App keet.io
Israel’s Biggest US Donor Now Owns CBS – Just International just-international.org
Larry Ellison Is A Billionaire Today Thanks To The CIA The CIA was the customer that launched Oracle, co-founder Larry Ellison said on stage Sunday night. businessinsider.com
Michael Dell, Murdochs will also be involved in TikTok deal, Trump says | CNN Business Tech and media giants Larry Ellison, Michael Dell and Lachlan and Rupert Murdoch will be a part of the group to take over TikTok’s algorithm in the acquisition of the social media platform’s US operations, President Donald Trump said on Sunday. edition.cnn.com
Pro-Israel tech firm to take control of US TikTok algorithm US President Trump and Chinese President Xi are close to a deal for Beijing to relinquish control of TikTok in the US thecradle.co
Saved - August 19, 2025 at 10:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that a shocking 100% of Thai women in Israeli agriculture reported sexual assault, according to a study by Dr. Yahel Kurlander and Dr. Shahar Shoham. They emphasized that the State of Israel has neglected these women, and filing complaints often leads to losing their jobs and homes.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

100% of Thai women working in Israeli agriculture report being sexually assaulted in Israel — 654 of 654 surveyed. A report by immigration experts Dr. Yahel Kurlander and Dr. Shahar Shoham said “the State of Israel has abandoned these women” and that filing a complaint can mean losing both job and home.

Saved - August 16, 2025 at 7:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Tom Alexandrovich, a senior Israeli cyberwarfare specialist, was arrested in Las Vegas alongside seven others for felony charges related to child exploitation. He has held significant roles in Israel's cyber defense, operating under the Prime Minister's authority. After his arrest, he was released and allowed to return to Israel. This incident was part of a larger undercover operation that led to the arrest of eight child sex predators in Henderson.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

A senior Israeli cyberwarfare specialist was arrested along with seven other child sex predators on felony charges of 'Luring a Child with Computer for Sex Act', by Las Vegas police in a sting operation. Tom Alexandrovich is a senior Israeli government official serving as a top cyberwarfare specialist. He has held roles such as Acting Head of Data & AI and Executive Director of the Cyber Defense Division at the Israel National Cyber Directorate (INCD). The INCD operates under the direct authority of the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. Alexandrovich was released and allowed to return to Israel.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Sources: Police: 8 child sex predators arrested in Henderson in undercover operation https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/sex-crimes/police-8-child-sex-predators-arrested-in-henderson-in-undercover-operation-3422205/ Eight Child Sex Predators Arrested During Undercover Operation https://www.lvmpd.com/Home/Components/News/News/2182/263 Cyber Tech / Tom Alexandrovich https://www.cybertechisrael.com/node/2876 US detains worker from Israel’s top cyber defense agency for questioning https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rymhyrqdxe

8 suspected child sex predators arrested in Henderson, police say A multi-agency undercover operation targeting suspected child sex predators led to the arrest of eight people over the past two weeks in Henderson, police said Friday. reviewjournal.com
Tom Alexandrovich | Cybertech Global Tel Aviv cybertechisrael.com
US detains worker from Israel’s top cyber defense agency for questioning Prime Minister's Office says incident resolved quickly, ending with brief questioning of National Cyber Directorate staffer before his release and return to Israel ynetnews.com
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 10:29 AM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

13 years ago this week Julian Assange published the Collateral Murder video showing the killing over a dozen people in Iraq, including 2 @Reuters journalists, seriously wounding 2 children He faces a 175 year sentence if extradited for truthful publishing https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org

Video Transcript AI Summary
Engagement complete: "We just engaged all eight individuals." About eight targets remain; "one guy crawling around down there," and "one individual, appears to be wounded, trying to crawl away." Cease fire was declared: "We won't shoot anymore." Coordinated movement: "Pushmaster two things. Pushmaster two things. We need to move time now." A vehicle pickup: "a black SUV or bongo truck picking up the body"—permission to engage granted; "Right through the windshield." Intelligence notes a van in the middle of the road with "about 12 to 15 bodies." Evacuation denied: "negative on evac" and "IPs will take them up to a local hospital over." "Push Master CrazyHorse18. We're taking him." Movement: "moving south by the moss dome on that road." Final visual: "Oh, yeah. Look at those dead bastards."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once you get on, just open up. Speaker 1: Roger, I see your element. Got about 400. You're clear. Speaker 2: Alright. Fire it. Speaker 1: Line up. Let me know when you get in. Force you. Speaker 0: Light them all up. Speaker 3: 02 traffic 260 Speaker 2: Come on. Fire. Speaker 1: Roger. Speaker 2: Keep Keep Speaker 0: Keep shoot. Speaker 4: Pushmaster two things. Pushmaster two things. We need to move time now. Speaker 0: Alright. We just engaged all eight individuals. Now we got a few of our Speaker 5: super still firing. Roger. We got him. Speaker 4: 26. This is 26. We're moving. We got this. Speaker 5: Oh, I'm sorry. I'm Speaker 0: hit him by heck. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again. Speaker 4: 26. Speaker 2: Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Speaker 5: Alright. We got about eight individuals. Yeah. Speaker 2: We got one guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely go down. Speaker 0: Or shoot some more. Roger. Speaker 5: Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Speaker 0: 2618. 2618. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. That goes dead bastards. Speaker 0: Nice. 2618. Thank you, Andrea. Spears zero two in flight. Three change zone four at this time. Speaker 3: Spears zero two, three change Speaker 4: zone. Nice. Speaker 0: Good shoot. Thank you. Speaker 2: One guy moving down there, but he's in one Speaker 4: to south. Speaker 2: Alright. We'll let him know so they can hurry up in over here. Speaker 0: It's 18. We also have one individual, appears to be wounded, trying to crawl away. Speaker 4: Roger. We're gonna move down there. Speaker 0: Roger. We'll cease fire. Speaker 2: And we won't shoot anymore. Speaker 0: He's getting up. Have you had a weapon on his hand? Speaker 2: No. No. I haven't seen one yet. You guys got that guy crawling right now on the curb? Yeah. I got him. I put two rounds in here, and you guys are shooting over there too. So we'll see. Air rocket. Speaker 6: Any push master 36 l Speaker 1: on this Hotel27 over. Speaker 4: Hotel27, FlightMaster7. Go ahead. Speaker 7: Roger, I'm just trying to make sure that you guys have my turf over. Speaker 4: Roger, we got the turn. Speaker 5: Come on, buddy. I Speaker 2: got you to pick up a weapon. Yeah. We're trying to get permission to engage. Speaker 4: Come on. Let us shoot. Speaker 0: A push master CrazyHorse18. You're taking him. Push master CrazyHorse18. Speaker 4: It's Bushmaster seven, go ahead. Speaker 0: Roger, we have a black SUV or bongo truck picking up the body. Request permission to engage. Speaker 4: Bookmaster seven, roger. This is bookmaster seven, roger. Engage. Speaker 0: 18, engage. Clear. Come on. Clear. Clear. Morning. Coming around clear. Roger. Trying to Clear. I hear him. I I lost him. Got him. Speaker 2: I'm firing. Speaker 4: George, you push back to four. Do you got any BDA on that truck over? Speaker 0: You're clear. Is a crazy horse standby. Speaker 1: Should have a van in the middle Speaker 0: of the road with about 12 to 15 bodies. Speaker 2: Oh, Look at that. Right through the windshield. Speaker 3: Yeah. Hyper five two zero four, free change zone four. Aggressive 20 command to 8 is active. Speaker 0: Port arrival 311. Speaker 3: 20. Speaker 5: Magnetic radio aggressive 34 zone zone two zero eight four zone four. Call for exchange. Speaker 3: Aggressive four three, zone correction. Aggressive three four, zone three zero is closed before exchange zone one. Speaker 5: Aggressive three four, welcome. Roger. Speaker 1: Roger, that's negative on evac and the two green kids to Rusty. They're gonna have the IPs up link up with Speaker 5: us over here, Brake. No. Speaker 1: IPs will take them up to a local hospital over. Speaker 5: Copy over. Speaker 0: Roger, stop break. Crazy horse one eight, request permission to engage. I'm picking up the wounding. Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm returning information to engage. Speaker 4: Come on. Let us shoot. Speaker 0: A push MasterCrazyHorse18. We're taking him. PushMasterCrazyHorse18. Speaker 2: I got it. Speaker 6: Last call, station. Hotel two six. Speaker 0: Moving south by the moss dome on that road. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Look at those dead bastards.
Collateral Murder collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 5:20 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

RELEASE: Third batch of documents showing doctoring of facts in released version of OPCW chemical weapons report on Syria. Including a memo stating 20 inspectors feel released version “did not reflect the views of the team members that deployed to [Syria]” https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/

WikiLeaks - OPCW Douma Docs wikileaks.org
Saved - June 23, 2025 at 3:40 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Hollywood script writers who say they are 'Jewish' have been planting the mental seeds for war with Iran for years, including in Top Gun Maverick, Homeland, 24, and in the DreamWorks film on Julian Assange 'The Fifth Estate'. Excerpt from Oxford Union speech, 30 January 2013. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-dec-19-oe-stein19-story.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims an upcoming film starring Benedict Cumberbatch attacks both them and Iran, potentially inciting war. The film, set to release in November, allegedly opens with a scene in Tehran depicting Iranian scientists designing a nuclear bomb, marked with nuclear symbols. A scientist, Simsana, is shown writing dimensions consistent with the Shabab missile on the file. Another scene in Cairo shows Simsana meeting a CIA agent, revealing he copied the bomb diagram from memory and that Iran will test the explosive within six months. The speaker contends this contradicts the US national intelligence estimate, which stated with high confidence that Iran did not have a nuclear program. The film portrays the Iranian scientist saying they would sell the technology, even to the wrong hands. The speaker asserts this is a lie propagated by corrupt media and culture, driven by powerful corporations and government agencies that benefit from war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it is not just an attack against us. It is an attack against Iran. It fans the flames to start a war with Iran, and it's coming out, in November. It's being filmed now. Benedict Cumberbatch is playing me. This movie has British involvement, and and people in Britain should be concerned about it. How does it open? Well, and this has not been previously disclosed before, the opening scene, is in a military complex in Tehran. The camera comes in, closes up on a file, and it is a design for a nuclear bomb marked with nuclear symbols. There's notes and whispers all around, and they're in Farsi. They're in Persian. There's an older scientist speaking. A high speed camera will measure the explosive charge web designed to trigger the chain reaction. It is then revealed by the camera four scientists in white coats walking in a windowless corridor. The youngest, Simsana, remember that name, Simsana, writes on the file. The dimensions of the payload are consistent with the Shabab missile. Okay. That's the opening scene. Iran is working on an atomic weapon. The opening scene of a of a film about WikiLeaks. How how does this have anything to do with us? Well, we'll come to it. The next scene concerning Iran is in Cairo where that Iranian nuclear scientist is meeting a US CIA agent, Kate. Close-up again on the handwritten diagram of a nuclear bomb, the same diagram as we saw in the opening. And Smaug says, I copied it from memory. They're I copied it from memory. They're testing the explosive in the next six months. Now remember what Tom's national intelligence estimate found. Iran did not have a nuclear program. All 16 US intelligence agencies feeding into that report said that was the case with high confidence and has been reconfirmed every year since that point. The senior diplomat who's also at the table with the CIA agent says, shit. We thought they were at least three years away from a bomb. Another lie. Tom's report does not say that they're three years away from a nuclear bomb. So it's a lie upon a lie, a great big budget thing that's going to be pushed out in November. The Iranian nuclear scientist then says, if it works, they won't hesitate to sell the technology, And even if one of these things sorry. If it works, they won't hesitate to sell the technology. And even if these one of these things gets into the wrong hands, they'll sell it anyway. So that's the reality of where we're at, not merely a war of intelligence agencies, but a war of corrupt media, corrupt culture. That war, we have got to understand, people who have appeared on this panel have been involved sometimes with great sacrifice at revealing the truth about important parts of the world, how the world is unfolding, how the world is shaping, the nature of institutions. They have revealed it heroically, in many cases, to the historical record, to our civilization as a whole, to you, you have to understand that where there's great powers at work, I don't mean shadow shadow conspiracies. I mean enormous cultural powers, enormous industrial powers, the the vast network of, corporations, that interact with government agencies around the world selling them products, shipping their logistics from one place to another. The National Security Agents for Agency, for example, now has approximately 70% of its expenditure, passed through Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, etcetera. This produces a lobby, that pushes in particular directions. How is it that such a lie got into a script about Wikileaks? How how is it that in the light of that national intelligence estimate that anyone could think that it was tolerable, acceptable to foist that lie upon the public, that it would make it all the way through the Hollywood system, the distributors would pick it up because they perceive that that is where the power lies in The United States. They perceive that it's perfectly okay to slander an entire nation, that it's perfectly okay to beat the drums of war like that because people in that system want the war. They want it.
Who runs Hollywood? C'mon I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. latimes.com
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 6:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that the U.S. Intelligence Community recently assessed that Iran is not currently pursuing a nuclear weapon. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard noted that Supreme Leader Khamenei has not reauthorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The Intelligence Community is keeping a close watch on any potential changes in Tehran's stance regarding nuclear weapons. This information was part of Gabbard's opening statement for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence during the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

US intelligence assessed just weeks ago that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon “The IC [Intelligence Community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003. The IC is monitoring if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.” - Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, 25 March 2025

Video Transcript AI Summary
The IC assesses that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and Supreme Leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 2003. The IC continues to closely monitor whether Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and supreme leader Khomeini has not authorized the nuclear weapons program that he suspended in 02/2003. The IC continues to monitor closely if Tehran decides to reauthorize its nuclear weapons program.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Source: DNI Gabbard Opening Statement for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, as prepared on the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/congressional-testimonies/congressional-testimonies-2025/4059-ata-opening-statement-as-prepared

Saved - June 4, 2025 at 9:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Palantir is significantly expanding its role in American surveillance through extensive data collection on citizens, fueled by multiple contracts with Federal agencies. An Executive Order from March 2025, signed by Trump, mandates the removal of barriers to data sharing among agencies, while the Administration invests heavily in Palantir. Their product, 'Foundry,' is already in use by several agencies, potentially granting the government unprecedented access to private records without warrants. This raises concerns about privacy and the implications of such surveillance capabilities.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Palantir is engaged in a major expansion of the American surveillance state Spyware company Palantir is engaged in large-scale data collection on American citizens, having taken on multiple contracts across Federal Government agencies with large holdings of private information. A March 2025 Executive Order signed by Trump mandated all Federal Agencies to remove all barriers to intra- and inter-agency sharing of unclassified records. At the same time, the Administration is committing hundreds of millions of dollars to Palantir, a major intelligence contractor whose CEO Alex Karp told an investor call in February 2025: “Palantir is here to disrupt... and, when it’s necessary, to scare our enemies and, on occasion, kill them.” Palantir's data analytics product 'Foundry' is already installed within four Federal agencies including the Health and Human Services Department and the Department of Homeland Security, with talks under way with other agencies including the IRS. Widespread deployment would give the Administration unprecedented warrantless access to the private records of everyone in the United States, whether they are suspects in a criminal investigation or not.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Sources: Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans https://web.archive.org/web/20250601001327/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html How Palantir Will Build A Zionist Surveillance State https://the307.substack.com/p/how-palantir-will-build-a-zionist The Gleeful Profiteers of Trump’s Police State https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/02/palantir-alex-karp-trump-private-prisons-profiteers/ Executive Order: Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/stopping-waste-fraud-and-abuse-by-eliminating-information-silos/ Palantir Knows Everything About You https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-palantir-peter-thiel/?embedded-checkout=true

Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans The Trump administration has expanded Palantir’s work with the government, spreading the company’s technology — which could easily merge data on Americans — throughout agencies. web.archive.org
How Palantir Will Build A Zionist Surveillance State. The Newest Expansion Of The Surveillance State Will Help With The Crackdown On Pro-Palestine Speech. the307.substack.com
The gleeful profiteers from Trump’s police state Palantir’s stock soared this week as its CEO cheerfully screamed, “We’re doin’ it,” on an investor call—clarifying that “it” includes “on occasion” killing people. motherjones.com
Stopping Waste, Fraud, and Abuse by Eliminating Information Silos By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:Section 1.  Purpose.  whitehouse.gov
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 5:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that a significant data breach has exposed the personal information of thousands of Israeli soldiers. The weak security of the website enabled easy access to their data using just their ID numbers, without any extra verification needed.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Data of thousands of Israeli soldiers leaked “The breach, coupled with the weak security of the website, allows anyone to access soldiers’ data simply by entering their ID number, without going through any additional verification. This allowed for the extraction and collection of personal information belonging to tens of thousands of soldiers.”

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Source: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250416-data-of-thousands-of-israel-soldiers-leaked/amp/

Data of thousands of Israel soldiers leaked – Middle East Monitor middleeastmonitor.com
Saved - April 6, 2025 at 5:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Wikileaks highlighted Google's acquisition of Israeli cybersecurity firm Wiz for $32 billion, noting it as Google's largest acquisition and a significant influx of alumni from Israeli military intelligence Unit 8200 into the company. In response, Paulina Plazas shared a link, presumably related to the topic, though the content of the link was not specified.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Google's deal to buy Israeli cybersecurity heavyweight Wiz for $32 billion won't just be Google's largest ever acquisition. It also imports a major new cohort of Israeli Unit 8200 military intelligence alumni into the tech giant. https://apnews.com/article/google-alphabet-wiz-32-billion-e50fb41b9a84a1056a116f963e6efed0 https://www.timesofisrael.com/from-waze-to-wiz-how-google-learned-to-love-israeli-tech/

Google to buy cybersecurity firm Wiz for $32 billion in the biggest deal in company's history The all-cash deal is set to boost Alphabet’s profile in the cloud computing market, a space currently led by Amazon and Microsoft. apnews.com
From Waze to Wiz: How Google learned to love Israeli tech The biggest buyout in the country's history will make the unpretentious Wiz founders multibillionaires, while an estimated $4 billion in taxes is set to flow into national coffers timesofisrael.com

@paulinaplazas - Paulina Plazas

@wikileaks Reminder: https://t.co/f4meHZWhzU

@Vision4theBlind - Vision4theBlind

I can't get over the fact they aired this on 60 Minutes back in December and then you see all the chaos going on around the world and no one brings this up https://t.co/ew1gIuoJpP

Saved - April 6, 2025 at 5:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Google's acquisition of Israeli cybersecurity firm Wiz for $32 billion marks its largest deal yet and brings a significant number of Israeli Unit 8200 alumni into the company. Unit 8200, akin to the NSA, is known for its role in military intelligence and has influenced Israel's tech startup landscape, with many successful founders having served in the unit. This trend extends to major tech firms, where numerous graduates are employed. The acquisition is seen as a continuation of this integration, with all Wiz staff remaining on board and the founders being former Unit 8200 operatives.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Google's deal to buy Israeli cybersecurity heavyweight Wiz for $32 billion won't just be Google's largest ever acquisition. It also imports a major new cohort of Israeli Unit 8200 military intelligence alumni into the tech giant. https://apnews.com/article/google-alphabet-wiz-32-billion-e50fb41b9a84a1056a116f963e6efed0

Google to buy cybersecurity firm Wiz for $32 billion in the biggest deal in company's history The all-cash deal is set to boost Alphabet’s profile in the cloud computing market, a space currently led by Amazon and Microsoft. apnews.com
From Waze to Wiz: How Google learned to love Israeli tech The biggest buyout in the country's history will make the unpretentious Wiz founders multibillionaires, while an estimated $4 billion in taxes is set to flow into national coffers timesofisrael.com

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Unit 8200 is a specialised Israeli signals intelligence unit – equivalent to the NSA - and the largest single military unit in the Israel Defense Forces. It is behind the development of 'Lavender,' an artificial intelligence system used to automate assassination targets in the Gaza genocide: “...the IDF bombed them in homes without hesitation, as a first option. It’s much easier to bomb a family’s home. The system is built to look for them in these situations.” https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/ https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-820689

‘Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza The Israeli army has marked tens of thousands of Gazans as suspects for assassination, using an AI targeting system with little human oversight and a permissive policy for casualties, +972 and Local Call reveal. 972mag.com
Secretive cyber warfare: What is the IDF's unit 8200? Unit 8200 is the equivalent of the US National Security Agency or Britain's GCHQ and is the largest single military unit in the Israel Defense Forces. jpost.com

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Unit 8200 graduates are heavily represented in Israel's tech startup sector, creating a pipeline for military intelligence personnel to be absorbed into the global tech sector via the venture capital ecosystem: “...nearly 50% of founders whose companies were acquired for over $100 million in the last decade served in the unit [8200]” https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/sjltwsk2kg

From Unit 8200 to Wiz’s $32B exit: The blueprint for Israeli cyber success | CTech New data breaks down what makes Israel’s cyber entrepreneurs so effective. calcalistech.com

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

This pipeline extends all the way to the top. Meta's Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) Guy Rosen is a Unit 8200 graduate. https://www.metacareers.com/blog/introducing-our-security-team/ https://web.archive.org/web/20230103093532/https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/tech-news/2020-12-15/ty-article/.premium/idf-intel-units-veterans-help-facebook-destroy-competition/0000017f-dc3d-db5a-a57f-dc7f00ff0000

Error metacareers.com
Israeli cyber unit veterans help Facebook destroy competition Israeli-based Onavo, Which Was Acquired by Facebook in 2013, Plays a Central Role in Facebook's Efforts to Thwart Competition, U.S. Suit Alleges web.archive.org

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Open source reporting has identified hundreds of Unit 8200 graduates placed within Google, Meta, Microsoft, LinkedIn and Amazon: https://scheerpost.com/2022/11/01/revealed-the-former-israeli-spies-working-in-top-jobs-at-google-facebook-and-microsoft/ https://insidetelecom.com/former-unit-8200-israel-idf-occupy-big-tech-media-roles/ https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/unit-8200-startup-machine-israel-laurence-sangarde-brown-8wepe/

Revealed: The Former Israeli Spies Working in Top Jobs at Google, Facebook and Microsoft Studying employment databases, MintPress has ascertained that hundreds of agents from Israeli military intelligence and spying organization Unit 8200 are now employed in influential roles in many of the world’s largest tech and communications companies, including Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon. scheerpost.com
Fromer Unit 8200 Israel IDF Occupy Leading Roles in Google, Microsoft, and Meta International Telecoms Business Magazine insidetelecom.com
Unit 8200: The Startup Machine of Israel Welcome back to "Networks"! In this edition, we explore the remarkable impact of Unit 8200, the elite Israeli Intelligence Corps unit known for producing some of the most influential entrepreneurs and tech leaders in the world. Often dubbed the "startup machine" of Israel, Unit 8200 has played a piv linkedin.com

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Google's acquisition of Wiz is an escalation of this pattern. All 1800 Wiz staff will remain employed under the transition, and all four Wiz founders are former Unit 8200 operatives. The potential acquisition was described by the Times of Israel as a “new feather in cap of Israeli military intelligence.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/googles-wiz-acquisition-another-feather-in-the-cap-of-israeli-military-intelligence/

Google’s Wiz acquisition would be new feather in cap of Israeli military intelligence As war in Gaza squeezes Israel's economy, likely deal underscores resilience of tech industry, where many are alumni of military intelligence units timesofisrael.com

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

More so than ever, Google Is Not What It Seems: “What Lockheed Martin was to the twentieth century, technology and cybersecurity companies will be to the twenty-first,” according to former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, former director of Google Ideas. https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/

Julian Assange - Google Is Not What It Seems wikileaks.org
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 8:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that the CIA concealed James Jesus Angleton's ties to Israeli intelligence, revealed in newly unredacted JFK assassination records. Angleton undermined JFK's efforts to stop Israel from obtaining nuclear weapons and was lauded by Mossad's Meir Amit as a significant Zionist. He also concealed documents from the Warren Commission regarding Kennedy's assassination. Just before his death, Angleton remarked on the promotion of those who lied and betrayed, highlighting a common pursuit of absolute power among them. The file had been partially released in previous years.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

CIA suppressed top officer James Jesus Angleton's connection to Israeli intelligence as shown by this newly unredacted JFK assassination records file. Angleton had subverted JFK's policy of preventing Israel from acquiring nuclear weapons and was praised by Mossad head Meir Amit as "the biggest Zionist of them all". Angleton was also found to have hidden documents from the Warren Commission on the assassination of President Kennedy. Shortly before he died, Angleton stated "The better you lied and the more you betrayed, the more likely you would be promoted... outside of their duplicity, the only thing they had in common was a desire for absolute power." The file was previously "released" in 2017, 2018 and 2022 in redacted form.

Saved - December 28, 2024 at 10:25 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

20 years on from the invasion of Iraq, @AJFaultLines looks at the case of Julian Assange who gave us an unprecedented insight into the war, including the infamous 'Collateral Murder' release https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org

Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, faces extradition to the US for publishing classified documents revealing truths about the Iraq and Afghan wars. He has been imprisoned in the UK for over three years without a conviction, with the US seeking a 175-year sentence under the Espionage Act. His publications, including the infamous "collateral murder" video, exposed high civilian death tolls and military misconduct. Assange's case raises significant concerns about press freedom, as it sets a dangerous precedent for journalists. His supporters argue that the government is punishing him for revealing uncomfortable truths, while Assange's health deteriorates in prison. The implications of his prosecution could drastically alter how national security journalism is conducted, limiting access to vital information for the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm able to see Julian once or twice a week and it changes from week to week. Some some weeks I can't see him. I have to take 2 buses and 2 trains to get there. It's quite long, and the visit is about an hour and a bit. And then we're kind of waving and blowing kisses, and it's just, it's such a bizarre thing. Julian is in the harshest prison in the UK. He's not serving a sentence, and the US wants to put him in prison for a 175 years about publishing the truth about the Iraq and Afghan wars. Speaker 1: We journalists are at our best when we share with activists and lawyers the goal of exposing illegality and wrong doing. Speaker 2: It's been 13 years since the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, entered the global stage. In 2010, the Australian citizen published the largest trove of classified US documents to date, upending the government's narrative about its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Speaker 3: It's another fact from the files that indicates that a much, much higher civilian death toll is likely. Speaker 0: These publications were a game changer. This really opened the eyes of the public to what was going on. It's, my great, great pleasure to present you with the Sydney Peace Medal for your conviction that truth matters and that justice depends on it. Speaker 2: Assange has spent much of his time since then confined in one way or another. In 2019, the US charged him with publishing classified materials and has been fighting to extradite them. Speaker 4: It's the first time the government has tried to use the Espionage Act against the publisher. That really is, you know, something new and something especially dangerous. Speaker 0: They're keeping Julian in prison because they want to send a message that if they can do it to someone who has won dozens of prizes for the very publications that he's public he's being prosecuted over. They can do it to anyone. This is a precedent setting case. Speaker 2: On this episode of Fault Lines, we look at what Julian Assange's case could mean for press freedom and the consequences he's faced for publishing state secrets. Speaker 5: The government, instead of dealing with the policies disclosed by Assange, they've done what they always do. They blame the messenger. Speaker 0: That volcano is already erupting. It's already erupting. It's an explosive eruption. Julian and I have 2 children, Gabriel, who's 5a half, and Max, who's going to be 4 in a few weeks' time. So Max was a few weeks old when Julian was arrested. The answer I give my children about why their father is in prison is he angered some very powerful people who put him in prison, that Julian is in prison because he did something right, not because he's did anything wrong. Speaker 1: The video is in Speaker 2: To understand the case against Assange, we wanted to look back at some of the secrets he exposed. Perhaps the most famous one is this video of a US attack in Iraq, which he called collateral murder. Speaker 6: Come on. Let us shoot. Okay. Claire. Come on. Claire. Speaker 1: Their desire was simply to kill and to find any excuse in the rule rules of engagement which committed that killing. And the behavior of the pilots is like they are playing a computer game. Speaker 6: Light them all up. There's a true traffic. Come on. Fire. Speaker 1: Hey, Roger. Speaker 2: The footage showed a 2007 US helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed more than a dozen people, including a 22 year old Reuters photojournalist, Namir Noor Eldeen, and his colleague, Saeed Schma. Speaker 7: Yeah. This is Saeed. And this is Namira. Speaker 6: Light them all up. This is your true traffic. 2 60. Come on. Fire. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. Speaker 8: They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. They're right. Speaker 6: Oh, yeah. Look at that. Right through the windshield. Speaker 0: I remember crying when I saw it and cried many times since when I watched that. It was just so cool. Speaker 2: For years, US officials claimed that the Iraqis had been killed in a firefight, but it was only after WikiLeaks published the video 3 years later that the government's narrative unraveled. Speaker 9: So that there was that sense of, oh my god. So they they they knew all along. They they must have seen this stuff. Speaker 2: A military investigation cleared the pilots involved in the attack. The only people who faced any charges were those who leaked and published the video. Months after WikiLeaks released the video, it published nearly 400,000 classified military documents about the US led war in Iraq, capturing headlines. Speaker 10: Modern warfare with its high-tech weapons was supposed to spare civilians. But in Iraq, that turned out to be a false promise. Speaker 11: We estimate that when fully analyzed, these logs will bring to the public knowledge more than 15,000 previously unreported civilian deaths. Speaker 0: The disclosure provides a trove of new evidence on the violence, torture, and suffering that's befallen Iraq since the 2003 US invasion. Speaker 5: Here, for the first time, was official documents and diplomats not only confirming that these things are happening, but they were happening in a huge scale. Speaker 1: Well, this particular set of documents is the most extraordinary compendium of war that has ever been released. Speaker 9: It was astonishing. I mean, no no one had ever ever seen that amount of material or that nature of material and that quantity, before. This was an immensely complicated publishing task. Speaker 2: Alan Rusbridger was the editor in chief at The Guardian at the time. It was one of several major news organizations that WikiLeaks partnered with to publish 100 of 1000 of classified materials between 2,010 and 2011. They were uploaded to WikiLeaks' website by an anonymous source and then vetted. Speaker 9: You know, we spent weeks reading the material and saying, well, this is significant. This has public interest. This shows hypocrisy or deception. There there was certainly evidence of the American military behaving in in a violent, murderous, sometimes way and in deceiving the American people about it. Speaker 2: The leaks exposed how the US government was turning a blind eye to torture, rape, and murder by Iraqi authorities and how its drone campaign in Afghanistan led to an increase in civilian deaths. They also revealed how flawed intelligence landed 100 in Guantanamo Bay prison and the reality of US diplomatic operations around the world. Assange is the only publisher facing any charges for releasing this material. Speaker 5: To be, Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, did a major public service. As a national security reporter, if you're just relying on what you get from the agencies, you'd be peeling back a very thin layer of an onion. And so you're relying on whistle blowers. Speaker 2: Could you imagine this information being disclosed if it weren't for WikiLeaks? Speaker 12: Absolutely no. There's no way. You can maybe access them after 50 years, after 40 years. And at that point, that kind of information is not helpful to the, to the public. Speaker 2: Of all the stories that WikiLeaks published, how many were proven to be untrue? None of the stories have ever, Speaker 5: been shown to be anything other than true. If it was a libel, if it was misinformation, disinformation, you could partly understand why, the US and British governments might be upset, but why are they upset about publishing the truth? Speaker 13: Well, good afternoon. The United States strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information. Speaker 5: I met one of the state department officials at, private party, and he was really angry, you know, and saying you're from a guardian. You've got blood in your hands. Speaker 13: In addition to endangering particular individuals, disclosures like these tear at the fabric of the proper function of responsible government. Speaker 2: And all these years later, did you have blood on your hands? Speaker 5: Understood. If they discover that someone had been killed as a as a result of the WikiLeaks disclosures. We'd have known about it. They would have said, well, you're responsible for that, and nothing, ever happened. Speaker 2: The Pentagon's chief investigator of the leaks admitted as much in 2013. Under oath, he said he couldn't provide a specific example of individuals killed as a result of WikiLeaks' disclosures. Nevertheless, Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst who leaked the documents, spent 7 years in prison until president Obama commuted her sentence in 2017. The sentence that she received was disproportionate relative to what, other leakers had received. Speaker 6: At the Speaker 2: time, the Department of Justice decided not to pursue charges against Assange. Speaker 0: They gave two reasons. One was Makes sense. Julian Assange is a publisher. He's not a hacker. And there's no way to go after WikiLeaks that would not set a precedent against the rest of the press. Speaker 2: That position changed when the administration did. Speaker 3: 2017 was when things got Shakespearean. There had been this growing tension and this real deep fear and concern about what to do about WikiLeaks. Speaker 4: The Trump administration wanted to use this case not just as an opportunity to go after Assange, but as an opportunity to go after national security journalism. Speaker 2: Much of Assange's story and the US's case against him is based here in the United Kingdom. It's where he spent much of his time under threat of prosecution by the US. Speaker 1: And why are they going after after WikiLeaks? Well, they want to stop this publication of information that embarrasses them. Speaker 2: After the leaks in 2010, Assange faced sexual assault charges in Sweden, which were later dropped. Fearing extradition to the US, he sought asylum here at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he remained confined to a small flat for nearly 7 years. Speaker 1: The United States is conducting an aggressive investigation in relation to trying to get up a an espionage charge, against me personally, and the FBI has even gone to Wales, in the United Kingdom, to visit, very various people. Speaker 11: Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been arrested in London. Speaker 2: Assange was dragged out of the embassy and arrested by British police on a US extradition request in 2019. Assange Speaker 9: is wanted in the US for leaking of 100 of thousands of classified military documents. Speaker 2: That same day, the US Department of Justice indicted Assange under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Then weeks later, the US added 17 charges, all for activities that national security journalists engage in every day. Speaker 4: Soliciting government secrets, communicating with sources confidentially, maintaining the confidentiality of the source's identity, and then publishing classified information. Speaker 0: And it concerns publications about the Iraq war log, the Afghan war diaries, the US State Department cables, the Guantanamo Bay detainee assessment briefs, and the rules of engagement, which were part of the collateral murder publication. Speaker 2: 17 of the 18 charges against Julian Assange fall under the Espionage Act. It's the first time the act has been used against a publisher. Speaker 4: You hear the phrase espionage act, and you think, well, this is about spies. This is about, you know, people who want to harm American national security. What the act, is about in practice is whistleblowers. Speaker 2: The timing of Assange's indictment matters. And to understand why, you have to go back to his time at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, particularly after Ecuador elected a president who was less sympathetic towards Assange and wanted to strengthen ties with the US. Speaker 0: An embassy, if if they're not backing you, is a black hole. It has all the the the legal carve outs you would need to just disappear a person, second half of twenty seventeen onwards. It was clear that that was not a safe place for Julian. Like, you could feel it in the air. I feared for his life. Speaker 2: At the time, the CIA was allegedly spying on Assange, including privileged conversations with his attorneys and physicians. CIA officials were reportedly concerned that he would go to Russia as whistleblower Edward Snowden had done, especially after WikiLeaks released Vault 7, the series which detailed how the CIA was hacking into devices to conduct electronic surveillance. Speaker 3: It was like an apocalypment for the agency. They had seen other agencies have leaks, and they thought this will never happen to us. So the fact that all of a sudden, you know, this was being laid bare on WikiLeaks website caused CIA's director, Mike Pompeo to become according to our sources absolutely irate. Speaker 14: It's time to call out WikiLeaks for what it really is. A non state hostile intelligence service. Speaker 3: When Pompeo took over, he would tell people within CIA, I want you to draw up Russian Speaker 14: military intelligence. Speaker 3: Things that you could do against WikiLeaks. Don't worry about the legality. Give me the art of the possible. I'll worry about the lawyers. Speaker 2: Zach Dorkman worked on a year long investigation for Yahoo News, which exposed that the CIA was doing more than spying on Assange. They were also allegedly having high level discussions with the White House about assassinating him. Speaker 3: Trump said, well, why don't we just kill the guy? You know? Like, kind of but which is imminently believable because it's kind of you know, Trump would say stuff. He would just toss off things. You know? Speaker 2: While these discussions were happening, a plot to kidnap Assange from the embassy was reportedly more advanced. Speaker 3: If they try to take him, what are we going to do? You know? Do we ram into a car that's carrying him a Russian diplomatic vehicle? What if there's like a gun battle? Who's gonna do the shooting? Is it gonna be us? Is it gonna be the Brits? What if he tries to take off by plane? Do we shoot the tires on on the plane out? And that's the stuff that really worried folks because they were advocated for by the CIA director himself. Speaker 2: In an interview with Megyn Kelly, Mike Pompeo was asked about this investigation. He admitted that there's pieces of it that are true. Speaker 14: Look. I I can't say much about this other than, whoever those 30 people who allegedly spoke with one of these reporters, they should all be prosecuted for speaking about classified activity inside the Central Intelligence Agency. Speaker 3: You know, Pompeo calling for the prosecution of our sources meant that our story was true because you cannot be prosecuted for something that isn't true. Nonetheless, having the former CIA director himself come out and essentially confirm it is is a big deal. Speaker 0: Mike Pompeo went rogue. He went rogue in relation to Julien. He went rogue in relation to WikiLeaks. And there were a lot of people who disagreed with that. Speaker 3: What these Trump administration lawyers said was, look, it may be illegal period for you to do this, for you to render Assange and bring him back to the US, but it's definitely illegal for you to do this if there aren't charges against him. So there were charges that were basically rushed. Speaker 0: You see, if you see what what's happening to Julian as a as a legal problem, you don't understand it. It's a political it's a political problem. It's a political persecution. Speaker 2: If extradited to the US under the Espionage Act, Julian Assange faces a 175 year sentence. 170 years are just for receiving and publishing classified information. Speaker 9: The thing about the Espionage Act is that there is no defenster. So you can't stand in front of a jury and say, this is why I did it. Please let me tell you about the public interest. It's just you did it, go straight to jail. Speaker 4: It makes a felon of anybody who discusses classified information even if they learn that classified classified information from a newspaper. Speaker 2: So in this interview, just in listening to disclosures to me Speaker 4: That's right. We are violating the terms of the Espionage Act, in this conversation. Speaker 9: The use of an act which was designed to clamp down on spying against acts of publication in the public interest just seems to me wrong. Speaker 4: Whatever you think of Julian Assange, you know, whether you think he's a hero or a villain, it doesn't matter. What really matters, is a prosecution of Assange would have terrible effects on press freedom in the United States. Speaker 15: A free and independent media is the bedrock of democracy. It's how public stay informed and how governments are held accountable. And around the world, press freedom is under threat. Speaker 2: Since taking office, president Biden's effort to expand press freedom has been a welcome change from the Trump administration. Speaker 4: And yet, so far, the Biden administration is pursuing the same the same strategy as the as the Trump administration did. I can't imagine that the Biden administration wants this case to be its press freedom legacy. Speaker 2: Technically, though, the future of this case isn't up to president Biden, but to attorney general Merrick Garland at the Department of Justice. Is just as dangerous and deadly. Speaker 4: Garland is gonna have to think about like, the first question is gonna be asked by any judge is what's the distinction? Like, where is the line between this case and the case tomorrow against the Wall Street Journal? He needs an answer to that question. Speaker 2: We reached out to the Department of Justice for an interview, but they declined, saying they do not comment on matters related to ongoing extradition requests. When we followed up with questions months later, they didn't respond. Speaker 5: Now I don't understand where the emphasis for this is coming from. Is it coming from the Department of Justice? Is it coming from the intelligence agencies? I mean, it's dangerous. Speaker 15: Why is Speaker 2: it dangerous? Speaker 5: Because if you're basically saying to journalists, national security is out of bounds to you. I don't see it that way. National security apparatus, needs to be held to account the same as anyone else. Speaker 12: It goes to the core of democracy. Unless you can access factual information about what your government is doing in secrecy with your money in your name. It's not democracy. Speaker 2: Assange's lawyers are appealing the US's extradition request in UK and European courts. In the meantime, he's being detained at Belmarsh Prison in South London. He's been there for more than 3 years without a conviction. And the government, the appeals process, this can be dragged out for years to come. Are they winning without ever winning a prosecution? Speaker 4: I mean, I I I think that the indictment alone of Assange has a chilling effect on national security journalism. Speaker 12: It's definitely about sending a message to everyone. You should think twice, maybe 10 times before publishing, unless you want to end up like him. Speaker 9: So if you think about it, what we have is an Australian citizen resident in Britain who are publishing material that on a third country, the Americans, don't want published. I can never imagine American journalists being extradited for publishing something that in other states, didn't want to be published. Speaker 0: Having Julian in Belomarsh is to silence him and to disappear him. He's the prisoner who has been there the longest on his wing. He's in a cell on his own. He had a meanie stroke in October 2021. What we know is that his his health is deteriorating for every day that passes. Obviously, if you put a person in a cage, it will shorten your life. It will kill you eventually. Right? It's not easy, but I don't feel alone at all. I feel like we're getting somewhere, that, the world has not forgotten about Julian. Speaker 2: While we were in London, Stella and Nabil met for the first time. Speaker 7: How is, Julian? Speaker 0: He's had a a bit of a difficult time. Speaker 7: Please tell him our greeting and, our appreciated for him. Speaker 0: Thank you. He wants you to visit him in in Belmarsh? Speaker 7: Yes. Speaker 0: He would like to Speaker 1: visit Yeah. Speaker 7: I I would like to to visit him, and, I hope I will visit him here Yes. In his house. Speaker 0: Oh, thank you so much. Speaker 1: It's the Speaker 0: lost picture. Pictures are made. Speaker 12: Yeah. What should make the public upset is that it's this perversion that the government who caused millions of victims and millions of refugees, is the very same government who dare to say that Julian is a criminal and put lives at risk. It's an incredible upside down world. Speaker 0: Thank you. You're welcome. I'm sorry for your loss. Speaker 7: It's not, not just a meal. We hope, for in the end, justice for all, the first first thing for Julian to get free. Speaker 4: If there were a successful prosecution of Assange, American media organizations would have to radically change the way they report about war and foreign policy, and the real losers would be us, the readers, who would have far less access to information we need in order to figure out whether government officials are doing the job we want them to do.
Collateral Murder collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 10:22 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

A defining moment in our understanding of the Iraq war - The 'Collateral Murder' gunning down of civilians including 2 @Reuters journalists by US forces released by Julian Assange and WikiLeaks in 2010 https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org

Video Transcript AI Summary
Open fire on the targets. We have multiple individuals in sight, including one crawling and possibly wounded. We need to confirm if they are armed. Requesting permission to engage a vehicle picking up bodies. Permission granted to engage. Engaging now; clear the area. We have a truck with several bodies visible. Confirming the situation: we have a black vehicle moving south. We will continue to monitor and engage as necessary. Stay alert for any further movements. Engagement is ongoing; maintain communication for updates. We are ready to proceed with the operation. Keep an eye on the area for any additional threats. Continuing to assess the situation and respond accordingly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No, Falcon. Once you get on, just open it up. Okay. I see your element got about 4 on these, out of launch. Speaker 1: You're clear. Speaker 2: Alright, Clari. Speaker 0: Here Wednesday line. Let Speaker 3: me know when you'd be having 4 chute. Speaker 2: Light them all up. Speaker 4: 2 zero two traffic, 2 sixties Speaker 2: Come on. Fire. I ride it. Big shoot. Speaker 1: Big shoot. Speaker 2: Roger. Got them. Speaker 0: Fixed. Is it too fixed? We're moving. We got this. Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sorry. I'm all done. Bypass? Speaker 2: Got damaged, Kyle. Sorry. I hit a bypass. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again. Speaker 0: It's not the 6. It's a base map for 26. Speaker 2: Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about, 8 individuals. Yeah. Speaker 3: We got 1 guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get down or shoot some more. Speaker 2: Got it. Speaker 1: Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18. The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. They go to dead bastards. Speaker 1: Nice. 26, crazy horse 18. Speaker 4: Thank you. There you have Spears zero two Speaker 2: in flight. 3 chains on 4 this time. Speaker 4: Spears zero two three chains. Nice. Speaker 1: Let's shoot. Thank you. Speaker 3: There's 1 guy moving down there, Speaker 1: but he's not in the 1 8. Speaker 5: To, the stop. Speaker 2: Alright. We'll let him know. Air smoke. Speaker 1: It's 18. We also have 1 individual, appears to be wounded. Carl is trying to crawl away. Speaker 5: Roger, we're gonna move down there. Speaker 1: Roger, we'll cease fire. Speaker 3: And we won't shoot anymore. Speaker 1: Get enough. And if he has a weapon down Speaker 2: in his hand? No. No. I haven't seen one yet. Speaker 3: So you guys got that guy crawling right now on a curb? Yeah. Speaker 2: I got him. I put 2 rounds near him, and you guys are shooting over there too. So, we'll see. Hey. I'm not gonna I Speaker 0: need Bushmaster 36 element. Is, hotel 27 over? Speaker 5: Hotel 27. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Roger, I'm just trying to make sure that you guys have my turb over. Speaker 2: Roger, we got that. Come on, buddy. I got you. Just pick up a weapon. Speaker 5: Hey, George. We're good for 5. We're pretty much full of breath. Speaker 1: Crazy horse 1, a request permission to, engage. Speaker 3: Picking up, picking up the wounded. Speaker 2: Yeah. We're trying to get permission to engage. Come on. Let us shoot. Speaker 1: A Bushmaster, crazy horse 18. Speaker 2: We're taking them. Speaker 1: Bushmaster Crazy Horse 18. Speaker 5: It's Bushmaster 7. Go ahead. Speaker 1: Roger, we have a black bass tube or Bongo truck picking up the body. Request permission to engage. Speaker 5: Bushmaster 7, Roger. This is Bushmaster 7, Roger, engaged. Speaker 1: 18, engaged. Clear. Come on. Clear. Speaker 2: Clear. Coming around clear. Under trying to Speaker 1: clear. Speaker 2: I hear I'm trying I lost him in the I got him. I'm I'm firing. Speaker 3: George, you're Speaker 5: going to push that to pull the NEBA on that truck over. Speaker 2: Thank you, Speaker 1: Clark. This is, crazy horse stand by. Should have a van in the middle of the road with about 12 to 15 bodies. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Look at that. Right through the windshield. Speaker 0: Alright. That's the safety code Speaker 5: for 2 to 6 o. Speaker 1: 5 minutes of the net truck, so I'm talking about 12 to 15. Speaker 0: And, Roger, I'll be standing by here. Speaker 1: Yes. Right. Right. Right. 2, departing, Sean, 208 for zone 4. We call frequency Yeah. Speaker 2: I just drove over a body. Yeah. Speaker 4: Hyper 5, 2, 4, free change on 4. Agresto 20, command to 89 is active for bravo 311. 20. Speaker 2: Magnet ready, aggressive 34 zone zone 20 8 for zone 4. Call for change. Speaker 4: Aggressive 43 zone. Correction aggressive 34 zone 30 is closed before friction zone 1. Speaker 2: Aggressive 34. Welcome. Roger. Speaker 0: Roger, that's negative, on EVAC and the 2, 3 and, kids to, Rusty. They're gonna have, the IPs up link up us over here, BRAIN. Do, Randy. I'd aggressive No. IPs will take them up to a local hospital over. Speaker 5: Sure. Copy. Over. Speaker 2: On, sir, fall for bringing our kids to a battle. That's right. Speaker 1: Ready to north 1 a will be set up north to south engaged with hellfire. Roger, break. Crazy horse 1, a request permission to, engage. Speaker 3: Ricky, I'm picking up the 1. Speaker 2: Returning permission to engage. Come on. Let it shoot. Speaker 1: A Bushmaster Crazy Horse 1 8. Speaker 2: We're taking them. Speaker 1: Bushmaster Crazy Horse 1 8. Speaker 2: Okay. Got Speaker 4: Last calling station, hotel 26. Speaker 2: The hotel boutique. Speaking to Charlie, but do you like your hotel PC though? I had a Speaker 1: black vehicle, so it's on a carton. Speaker 0: So right right to the north north of Speaker 2: the bottom. Yeah. I would like that over. Speaker 1: It was hell. Crazy horse 18. Speaker 2: Easy bus. Moving south by the lost stone on that road. Oh, yeah. There goes dead bastards.
Collateral Murder collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 10:21 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Trump Secretary of Defence pick Pete Hegseth speaks at John McCain rally in January 2008, introduced by Lindsey Graham. Hegseth founded the group "Vets for Freedom" that lobbied to keep the Iraq war going. https://t.co/KCMMXYRiFq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pete Heksef discusses the formation of Vets for Freedom, an organization of Iraq veterans advocating for continued U.S. involvement in Iraq. They approached Congress to emphasize the importance of their sacrifices and the need to win the fight against radical Islam. Pete shares his frustrations about troop levels and strategy during his deployment with the 101st Airborne. He highlights John McCain's unwavering support, noting McCain's belief in winning the war over political campaigns. McCain's willingness to advocate for an unpopular war resonated deeply with veterans. Pete expresses gratitude for the support from McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham, emphasizing their commitment during challenging times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pete, how do you say your last name? Heksef. Have you ever heard Vets for Freedom? It was an organization created, of veterans of Iraq that came to Congress to beg the Congress not to surrender. They came to Congress, and they said, whether you're a Republican, or you're a democrat or a vegetarian, please don't let what we have done in Iraq be for nothing. Hang in there. This Harry Reid statement, the world was lost, was news to Pete and his comrades. They didn't think they had lost, so they formed a group to come to Congress and literally beg us to see this thing through. And they were our anchor, they were our comfort, and they helped John and me and Joe Lieberman. And like every good thing, you know how they got started? In a bar in Charleston. Pete, please tell these people why you did not want us to surrender in Iraq and tell us about John McCain. Speaker 1: Well, it's an absolute honor to be here, especially with all these, decorated veterans. I mean, what what an honor. And what what Senator Graham said is absolutely accurate. We came up there as a group of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans saying, do not let the sacrifice of of the guys we fought over there with be in vain. I was over there with the 101st Airborne. From 2005 to 2006, and I came back a little frustrated because I knew we needed to win. And I knew Iraq is the central battlefront in a larger fight against radical Islam. And and John McCain knows that too, and so does Senator Graham and a lot of other senators on Capitol Hill, but some don't. And they wanted to ensure that we left that battlefield before it was finished. And so we, we just brought our guys up to, up to Capitol Hill, and we had we had as many meetings as we could with all the guys up on the hill, and and and they're thankfully, most were willing to meet with us. Some said, you know, we don't wanna hear it. Others said, we're with you, and we're gonna have your back. And the one that was with us the most was Senator John McCain. You know, he's seen it before. He's seen it before, and he understands the stakes. You know, I came back frustrated because I didn't think we had enough troops, and I didn't think we were necessarily using the right strategy. And there was one man in end of 2,006 who was saying that same thing. And it was John McCain. He was a lone voice in the wilderness, saying, You know what? This is a fight we need to win, and we need to we need to change our strategy, and we need more troops to do it. And he said something that I don't think has been reported on enough. And as a soldier, it really resonated with me. He said, You know what? I would rather win a war than win a campaign. And that's a powerful statement. That's a very powerful statement. I don't think you're gonna find many politicians out there that'll say that and really mean it. And as a veteran, that means a lot to me, and I know it means a lot to the other veterans up here on the stage, that he was willing to stick his neck out for an unpopular war because he knew it was the right thing to do. And that's what we need in Washington. And that's what John McCain will bring to Washington. And I can testify that he stood with us on Capitol Hill when things were tough. And that meant a lot to us. And I just, hope that all of you will remember that. And I I can't thank Senator Lindsey Graham enough as well. He was there with us every single minute standing strong on that House and Senate floor, and it was an honor to stand with him. So thank you. Thank you very much, Pete. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you very much, Pete. Lindsey, for your sake, I hope you don't live in South Carolina.
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 3:42 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

"Meta will allow U.S. government agencies and contractors working on national security to use its AI models for military purposes... a shift from its policy that prohibited the use of its technology for such efforts." https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/11/05/043209/meta-permits-its-ai-models-to-be-used-for-us-military-purposes

Meta Permits Its AI Models To Be Used For US Military Purposes - Slashdot An anonymous reader quotes a report from the New York Times: Meta will allow U.S. government agencies and contractors working on national security to use its artificial intelligence models for military purposes, the company said on Monday, in a shift from its policy that prohibited the use of its te... news.slashdot.org
Saved - October 2, 2024 at 12:42 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Breaking: The Council of Europe's Parliamentary Assembly has voted to confirm that Julian Assange was held as a political prisoner. https://t.co/UkHdmD1aI5

Saved - July 3, 2024 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A verified document from the Israeli Ministry of Intelligence in October 2023 discusses a plan for forced displacement of Gaza civilians to Egypt. The plan suggests establishing tent cities in Sinai, opening a humanitarian corridor, and constructing permanent cities in northern Sinai. The document can be found at rb.gy/g1k0d.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Verified document from Israeli Ministry of Intelligence in October 2023 suggests forced displacement of Gaza civilians to Egypt would "yield positive and long term strategic results". The advisory document envisions a three stage process including the establishment of tent cities in Sinai and opening of humanitarian corridor, followed by construction of cities in northern Sinai from which there would be no return. Link to full doc [עברית]: rb.gy/g1k0d

Saved - April 5, 2024 at 4:44 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Friday 5 April marks 14th years since the WikiLeaks 'Collateral Murder' release by Julian Assange showing the gunning down of civilians in Iraq Assange faces a 175 year sentence if extradited to the US for his publishing in the public interest #FreeAssangeNOW #CollateralMurder https://t.co/WCCn8XIsd5

Video Transcript AI Summary
We engaged 8 individuals, losing 2. Moving to engage more. Identified RPGs and AK-47s. Requesting pictures. Confirming location. Engaging targets. Hotel 26 reports 18 dead. Continuing fire. Bushmaster 7, please respond.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, fire. Here Wednesday, line. Let me know when you've gathered for 2. Light them all up. 2 traffic, 2 60. Come on. Fire. Hey, Roger. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We need to move time now. Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals. And we got 2 of ours. We're still firing. Got it. Got it. 2 6. The 2 6 will move, but we got this. Oh, I'm sorry. I was bypassing. Got damaged, Kyle. Sorry. Okay. Hit him. I hit him. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again. Master 6. Is it best mounted for 2 6? Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about, 8 individuals. Yeah. We got 1 guy crawling around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get a count or shoot some more. Got it. Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Crazy horse 18. This is hotel 26 over. Roger currently engaged in approximately 8 individuals, AIA, RPGs and AK 47. Cell 2, 6, you need to move to that location once crazy work is done and get pictures over. Try Ryan. We're 20 as a location. On the other. The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Oh, yeah. There goes dead bastards. Nice one. Nice. 26 crazy horse 18. Megan, Spears zero two is flight 3 chains on 4 this time. Spears zero two three chains. Nice. Let's shoot. Thank you. Hotel 2 Hotel 26, crazy horse 18. Crazy horse 18, Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
Saved - February 21, 2024 at 10:56 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Stella Assange: "This case is about whether state crimes can continue unpunished, unscrutinized - Julian's freedom is the only antidote. Julian Assange is the worlds most famous political prisoner...and the world is watching" @Stella_Assange #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW https://t.co/jlgbu3QPsr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude for the support at Downing Street, highlighting the importance of Julian Assange's case in defending journalism and truth. They condemn the attempt to silence Assange and emphasize the need for his freedom to protect democracy and human rights. The speaker criticizes those in power for their actions against Assange and calls for his release to prevent further injustice. They stress the significance of holding governments accountable and ensuring transparency in society. The speaker urges for solidarity in the fight for Assange's freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. You guys are amazing. Not just the turnout this evening coming here to Downing Street, but also over the past 48 hours. It's been incredible. Every time I got to court, I was greeted by this incredible supportive crowd that was cheering us on. And, I I told Julian all about how much support he has and also how much attention the media has given this case this time around. The world is watching. And finally, there's a realization about what this is really about, which is an attack on the truth, an attack on the public's right to know, and, a country's attempt to further their impunity and their cover ups and continue, to kill, with impunity without the threat of a media that will scrutinize them, of a public that will demand change. That cannot stand. Everything turns on the outcome of this case. Whether states can criminalize journalism and put journalists in prison like they've been doing in the UK with an Australian citizen, a publisher who's won many, many awards for his journalism, and they've stuck him in the deepest, darkest hole of the UK prison system and threatened and the US threatens to put him in the deepest, darkest hole of the US prison system for a 175 years. Shame. Shame. Julian's imprisonment is a result of people with too much power who lost the plot, who got power thirsty, and are guilty. They know they're guilty, and they want to continue to live their their lives without any consequences for the crimes they've committed. This case is about whether state crimes can continue unpunished, unscrutinized. Julian's freedom is the only antidote. We don't have a a decision today. Julian's life is at severe risk. Every single day he is in prison, he's a political prisoner. He is the world's most famous political prisoner. We know what happened to the other most famous political prisoner last week. That cannot happen to Julian. It cannot be allowed to happen. The world is watching. Julian has to be freed. Yes. Now whatever happens in the coming days, we can't know, but we can know that we will be there for Julian and be there for for our own democracy, our own future, our own ability to change policy, to change decisions, to change governments. Because if there's no scrutiny, we can't we can't be informed. We can't be able to change, make an informed decision about who we elect. Our rights are at stake, but Julian's life is at stake. If he is extradited, he will lose his life. He will be killed. He will be killed by the country that has been plotting his assassination. And the court heard how the United States, under the previous administration, which maybe the next administration, had plotted to assassinate him, who had plotted to poison him, who had plotted to kidnap him, who had plotted to rendition him. Shame. Shame on those who put journalists in prison. Shame on those who murder journalists. Shame on those who are afraid of the truth. That's not a society I wanna live in. We're better than that. The UK courts are also under scrutiny. They have heard about the murder plots against my husband. They are on notice that the country that is trying to extradite him has planned to murder him. They don't deny it. They just change the subject. The whole time we were in court, the other side somehow avoided to talk about what the what the documents Julian published revealed. They didn't talk about the war crimes. They didn't talk about the 15,000 civilian killings in Iraq that were revealed. They didn't talk about their torture and rendition fraud program. They didn't talk about, Guantanamo Bay. They simply changed the subject. Shame. This case is brought by criminals who want to maintain their impunity, who want to avoid the courts. They are the fugitives from justice, not Julian. Julian is justice. He is transparency. Yes. He is us. He is the public. And as long as Julian remains in prison, we are all in prison. Yeah. And they are free. It cannot be. Free Assange. Free Assange. Free Assange. Be there for Julian. He would be there for you. He is there for you. He needs to be free. Free Assange.
Saved - February 21, 2024 at 4:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange has spent over 13 years detained and 1771 days in a UK prison for publishing information exposing war crimes. If extradited to the US, he faces a 175-year sentence in conditions deemed as torture. There is evidence of a CIA plot to kidnap or assassinate him. Major media, human rights organizations, and politicians worldwide have called for his release, citing the threat to press freedom and the right to know. Amnesty warns that extraditing Assange would set a dangerous precedent. #FreeAssange #JournalismIsNotACrime

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

To date Julian Assange has spent 1771 days in a UK prison for publishing which revealed war crimes and human rights abuses Assange has spent more than 13 years detained in one form or another If extradited to the US he faces a 175 year sentence in conditions the UN's torture expert this month said would amount to torture @DrAliceJEdwards Earlier this week the publishers' wife, @Stella_Assange told assembled journalists that if Julian were extradited, "he will die" During the first day of the two day hearing on Tuesday the court was told of 'compelling evidence' of a CIA plot to kidnap or assassinate Mr. Assange, meaning that should extradition be allowed he would be sent to the very country that plotted to assassinate him Major media, free speech and human rights organisations have urged the immediate release of the WikiLeaks publisher including Amnesty, Reporters Without Borders, ACLU, PEN, HRW, The International Federation of Journalists, NUJ, The New York Times, The Guardian, El Pais, Le Monde, Der Spiegel, as well as politicians and leaders across the globe Amnesty: "Extraditing Julian Assange would set a dangerous precedent, threaten press freedom and undermine our right to know" #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW #JournalismIsNotACrime

Saved - February 21, 2024 at 4:38 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Insight: What do the @wikileaks State Dept cables reveal about Israel's long-term strategy in #Gaza? https://www.asawinstanley.com/2010/12/wikileaks-palestine-cables/

Wikileaks: Insights on Palestine from the Cables Written for the New Left Project Blog. A guest post by Asa Winstanley* One of the first things that struck me while reading the cables from the US embassy to Israel in Tel Aviv was how worried the … asawinstanley.com
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 12:36 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

BREAKING: Alleged WikiLeaks Vault 7 whistleblower Joshua Schulte given a 40 year sentence in a New York federal court today Watch: Inside the CIA's plot to assassinate Julian Assange The Vault 7 revelations led to a plot by the CIA to assassinate the publisher Julian Assange https://t.co/kr6e2gtwe6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, became a target for the US government after embarrassing them with leaked classified information. The CIA considered various plans to capture or kill him, but his asylum at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London made it difficult. The embassy's own security company, UC Global, was revealed to have been spying on Assange for the US. WikiLeaks' unique ability to publish classified documents without being involved in their theft made it a game changer. The release of the "Collateral Murder" video in 2010 exposed the US military's cover-up of friendly fire on journalists. Assange's most damaging release, Vault 7, revealed the CIA's hacking division's vulnerabilities. After being arrested and sentenced in the UK, Assange faces extradition to the US and a potential 170-year prison sentence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This guy is a traitor, a treasonous, and and and he has broken every law of the United States. And I'm not for the death penalty. So if I'm not for the death penalty and wanna do it, illegally shoot the son of a Speaker 1: Date, 2017. Target, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Location, the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Objective, killer capture. Origins of this order from, quote, the Highest levels, end quote, of the US government and CIA. In the song of the to be arrested. Funded. To be sold. Please find the out. Normally, a target like Assange would be easy. Grab him from his way home from work or shoot him as he walks to get his morning coffee. The only problem was Assange did none of these things. He hadn't done any of those things in years. For 5 years, Julian Assange had been hiding in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Killing him there are sending in the police would go against international law and be a foreign relations disaster, so the CIA had to concoct another plan. 1st, they discussed secretly kidnapping him from the embassy and bringing him back to America, but that would make it too obvious America broke the law. So they changed tactics, Kidnap him, turn him over to the British. That way, no one would know who was behind it then. Right? But then there was still the chance he wouldn't get extradited back to the US If the British police got him, eventually, they got so desperate that they had no choice. They discussed the unthinkable. Did the CIA A plot and plan to kill Julian Assange. Well, unthinkable for everyone else, very unthinkable for the CIA. Going against every international law, they contemplated assassinating Julian Assange in the embassy where he lived. Poisoned, snipers, sending in That says nothing was off the table. Quote, it got to the point where every human being in a three block radius of the embassy in London was working for 1 of the intelligence services, Whether they were street sweepers or police officers or security guards, end quote. It turns out that UC Global, the company that embassy paid to keep Assad Safe had been spying on him for US intelligence all along, the same company that embassy paid more than $5,000,000 to over the last 7 years. WikiLeaks changed the game. When it launched in 2006, it was like nothing the world had ever seen before. Anyone with any important information or proof of classified secrets could submit their data to WikiLeaks anonymously. Something that was not very common back then. What made WikiLeaks different from other whistleblower organizations is that they can never really be charged with stealing information. They didn't do any of the hacking themselves. So to a certain extent, they were innocent, which led to one other major advantage WikiLeaks had. Since they weren't involved in stealing the information, the classified documents they published could be used in courts. This was a game changer and terrifying for powerful people with dark secrets to hide. In April 2010, WikiLeaks releases this video. It's a Simple, low quality video from an Apache helicopter involved in a Baghdad airstrike on July 12, 2007. This video was an airstrike that killed 18 people, Pretty center stuff to the US military. What was strange, however, was that for a group of armed insurgents, they seem to be walking around rather calmly while a loud, heavily armed, unmistakably The way Western Apache helicopter was roaming above. But rest assured, the US military promised us that, quote, there is no question that coalition forces were Clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force. Boom, hello. There's nothing to see here. These were not enemy insurgents hostile forces that the US military shot up, but 2 unarmed photographers for the news agency Reuters, Namir Nur Aldine and his driver Sahid Chamah. The pilots mistook their cameras for weapons and a myriad of other casualties that didn't have any weapons or seem to be hostile at all. The US military just tried to cover up friendly fire on journalists. And almost instantly, the video was spread to every newspaper and online publication around the world. Of course, our top story this morning, the White House blasting the release of over 90,000 US military records on the war in Afghanistan. On August 16, 2012, it. The foreign minister of Ecuador announced that Julian Assange had been given asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Speaker 2: We trust that the United Kingdom will offer, as soon as possible, the guarantee for the safe passage for this asylum of mister Assange and that they We'll respect those international agreements that they have signed in the past and that they have always respected. Speaker 1: A tiny office in the embassy was converted into a studio with a bed, shower, Treadmill, kitchenette, and computer. If he had guests, they'd visit him in his little studio. His lawyers, therapist, and even a personal trainer had to make do with the small space. If he ever stepped foot outside the embassy, British police officers were front and center, ready to arrest him on the spot for skipping bail. And he would stay trapped I've been in the embassy for 5 years before WikiLeaks released their most damaging data dump yet, all at the cost of the US government's dignity. Julian Assange was a target for the US government under both president Obama and president Trump. He embarrassed the military, showed them how weak their security was, and on March 7, 2017, he released what they called Vault 7, arguably the most embarrassing data 3 of the CIA and the US governments. What was in Vault 7? All the internal documentation regarding the CIA's ultra secret hacking division and its tactics. The guys who were supposed to be the best Attackers in the world had apparently been hacked. This breach was not just embarrassing. It took away years of agency pride and dignity. The organization tasked with keeping America's secrets Couldn't even stop a leak of their most classified information. Vault 7 had it all. Details on electronic surveillance equipment, cyber warfare weapons, And how they could break into almost every cell phone operating system on the planets all out in the open for the world to see. Agency officials used to, quote, laugh about WikiLeaks, end quotes, Mocking the state department and the Pentagon for allowing so much material to escape their control. But now it was their turn. And for the CIA, revenge wasn't even a question. It was the only answer. Their blood was boiling, and all they could see was red. An example had to be made. And the main targets? Of course, it was Julian Assange. WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service. This new classification was bureaucratic speak that now justified the use of offensive measures against this non state hostile intelligence service. The fight was on, and according to Mike Pompeo, there were no rules. After his speech, he gave CIA officers the order to figure The, quote, art of the possible, end quote. He said, quote, nothing's off limits. Don't self censor yourself. I need operational ideas from you. I'll worry about the lawyers in Washington, end quote. On April 2, 2019, President Lenin Moreno announced Assange was no longer welcome at the embassy. Assange had very little time to prepare when 9 days later, the Ecuadorian government invited British police Into the embassy to arrest Assange on the basis of skipping bail, that very same day, Assange was found guilty and sentenced 50 weeks in prison starting May 1st. The US's time had come. Assange had been secretly indicted over a year earlier in March 2018. And on the Same day he was arrested in London, the indictment was unsealed. He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. A month later, while serving his sentence In the Belle Marsh prison, the US added 17 charges to the list. The maximum sentence, a 170 years in prison. A harder and 70 years for the leader of an organization that wasn't all that different from other news agencies that published leaks. At his Extradition hearing in May 2019, as such said, quote, I do not wish to surrender myself for extradition for doing journalism that has won many, many awards and protected many people, End quote. Julian Assange is currently still in Belmarsh prison at the time of recording this video. It. If he's extradited, he faces solitary confinement in a supermax prison, a 170 years in prison for someone who did the same job as most journalists out there. Where I wouldn't be surprised if he met the same fate as our friend whose first name starts with a j and last name starts with an e. Time will tell what the future holds for the whistleblower pioneer.
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 10:18 AM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Video: Inside the CIA's plot to assassinate Julian Assange #FreeAssange https://t.co/9ixDqjMnkA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, became a target for the US government after embarrassing them with leaked classified information. The CIA considered various plans to capture or kill him, including kidnapping him from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London where he was hiding. The embassy, unbeknownst to Assange, had been spying on him for US intelligence. Assange released Vault 7, exposing the CIA's hacking division and tactics, which infuriated the agency. He was eventually arrested, charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, and faces a potential 170 years in prison. Assange's fate remains uncertain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This guy is a traitor, a treasonous, and and and he has broken every law of the United States. And I'm not for the death penalty. So if I'm not for the death penalty and wanna do it, illegally shoot the son of a Speaker 1: Date, 2017. Target, Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks. Location, the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Objective, killer capture. Origins of this order from, quote, the Highest levels, end quote, of the US government and CIA. In the song of the to be arrested. Funded. To be sold. Please find the out. Normally, a target like Assange would be easy. Grab him from his way home from work or shoot him as he walks to get his morning coffee. The only problem was Assange did none of these things. He hadn't done any of those things in years. For 5 years, Julian Assange had been hiding in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Killing him there are sending in the police would go against international law and be a foreign relations disaster, so the CIA had to concoct another plan. 1st, they discussed secretly kidnapping him from the embassy and bringing him back to America, but that would make it too obvious America broke the law. So they changed tactics, Kidnap him, turn him over to the British. That way, no one would know who was behind it then. Right? But then there was still the chance he wouldn't get extradited back to the US If the British police got him, eventually, they got so desperate that they had no choice. They discussed the unthinkable. Did the CIA A plot and plan to kill Julian Assange. Well, unthinkable for everyone else, very unthinkable for the CIA. Going against every international law, they contemplated assassinating Julian Assange in the embassy where he lived. Poisoned, snipers, sending in That says nothing was off the table. Quote, it got to the point where every human being in a three block radius of the embassy in London was working for 1 of the intelligence services, Whether they were street sweepers or police officers or security guards, end quote. It turns out that UC Global, the company that embassy paid to keep Assad Safe had been spying on him for US intelligence all along, the same company that embassy paid more than $5,000,000 to over the last 7 years. WikiLeaks changed the game. When it launched in 2006, it was like nothing the world had ever seen before. Anyone with any important information or proof of classified secrets could submit their data to WikiLeaks anonymously. Something that was not very common back then. What made WikiLeaks different from other whistleblower organizations is that they can never really be charged with stealing information. They didn't do any of the hacking themselves. So to a certain extent, they were innocent, which led to one other major advantage WikiLeaks had. Since they weren't involved in stealing the information, the classified documents they published could be used in courts. This was a game changer and terrifying for powerful people with dark secrets to hide. In April 2010, WikiLeaks releases this video. It's a Simple, low quality video from an Apache helicopter involved in a Baghdad airstrike on July 12, 2007. This video was an airstrike that killed 18 people, Pretty center stuff to the US military. What was strange, however, was that for a group of armed insurgents, they seem to be walking around rather calmly while a loud, heavily armed, unmistakably The way Western Apache helicopter was roaming above. But rest assured, the US military promised us that, quote, there is no question that coalition forces were Clearly engaged in combat operations against a hostile force. Boom, hello. There's nothing to see here. These were not enemy insurgents hostile forces that the US military shot up, but 2 unarmed photographers for the news agency Reuters, Namir Nur Aldine and his driver Sahid Chamah. The pilots mistook their cameras for weapons and a myriad of other casualties that didn't have any weapons or seem to be hostile at all. The US military just tried to cover up friendly fire on journalists. And almost instantly, the video was spread to every newspaper and online publication around the world. Of course, our top story this morning, the White House blasting the release of over 90,000 US military records on the war in Afghanistan. On August 16, 2012, it. The foreign minister of Ecuador announced that Julian Assange had been given asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Speaker 2: We trust that the United Kingdom will offer, as soon as possible, the guarantee for the safe passage for this asylum of mister Assange and that they We'll respect those international agreements that they have signed in the past and that they have always respected. Speaker 1: A tiny office in the embassy was converted into a studio with a bed, shower, Treadmill, kitchenette, and computer. If he had guests, they'd visit him in his little studio. His lawyers, therapist, and even a personal trainer had to make do with the small space. If he ever stepped foot outside the embassy, British police officers were front and center, ready to arrest him on the spot for skipping bail. And he would stay trapped I've been in the embassy for 5 years before WikiLeaks released their most damaging data dump yet, all at the cost of the US government's dignity. Julian Assange was a target for the US government under both president Obama and president Trump. He embarrassed the military, showed them how weak their security was, and on March 7, 2017, he released what they called Vault 7, arguably the most embarrassing data 3 of the CIA and the US governments. What was in Vault 7? All the internal documentation regarding the CIA's ultra secret hacking division and its tactics. The guys who were supposed to be the best Attackers in the world had apparently been hacked. This breach was not just embarrassing. It took away years of agency pride and dignity. The organization tasked with keeping America's secrets Couldn't even stop a leak of their most classified information. Vault 7 had it all. Details on electronic surveillance equipment, cyber warfare weapons, And how they could break into almost every cell phone operating system on the planets all out in the open for the world to see. Agency officials used to, quote, laugh about WikiLeaks, end quotes, Mocking the state department and the Pentagon for allowing so much material to escape their control. But now it was their turn. And for the CIA, revenge wasn't even a question. It was the only answer. Their blood was boiling, and all they could see was red. An example had to be made. And the main targets? Of course, it was Julian Assange. WikiLeaks walks like a hostile intelligence service and talks like a hostile intelligence service. This new classification was bureaucratic speak that now justified the use of offensive measures against this non state hostile intelligence service. The fight was on, and according to Mike Pompeo, there were no rules. After his speech, he gave CIA officers the order to figure The, quote, art of the possible, end quote. He said, quote, nothing's off limits. Don't self censor yourself. I need operational ideas from you. I'll worry about the lawyers in Washington, end quote. On April 2, 2019, President Lenin Moreno announced Assange was no longer welcome at the embassy. Assange had very little time to prepare when 9 days later, the Ecuadorian government invited British police Into the embassy to arrest Assange on the basis of skipping bail, that very same day, Assange was found guilty and sentenced 50 weeks in prison starting May 1st. The US's time had come. Assange had been secretly indicted over a year earlier in March 2018. And on the Same day he was arrested in London, the indictment was unsealed. He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion. A month later, while serving his sentence In the Belle Marsh prison, the US added 17 charges to the list. The maximum sentence, a 170 years in prison. A harder and 70 years for the leader of an organization that wasn't all that different from other news agencies that published leaks. At his Extradition hearing in May 2019, as such said, quote, I do not wish to surrender myself for extradition for doing journalism that has won many, many awards and protected many people, End quote. Julian Assange is currently still in Belmarsh prison at the time of recording this video. It. If he's extradited, he faces solitary confinement in a supermax prison, a 170 years in prison for someone who did the same job as most journalists out there. Where I wouldn't be surprised if he met the same fate as our friend whose first name starts with a j and last name starts with an e. Time will tell what the future holds for the whistleblower pioneer.
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 2:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Julian Assange faces a 175-year sentence if extradited to the US for publishing. His reporting exposed the infamous Collateral Murder release, revealing the killing of over a dozen people, including journalists, by US forces in Iraq. This crucial information came to light thanks to Assange. #FreeAssange

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Julian Assange faces a 175 year sentence if extradited to the US for his publishing WikiLeaks infamous Collateral Murder release shows the killing over a dozen people in Iraq by US forces, including two Reuters journalists; seriously wounding two children - which only came to light due to Assange's reporting #FreeAssange https://collateralmurder.wikileaks.org/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 instructs the team to gather for item 2. Speaker 1 reports traffic. Speaker 0 acknowledges and thanks them. Speaker 2 urgently tells Bushmaster 26 to move. Speaker 0 confirms engagement of 8 individuals and ongoing firing. Speaker 1 apologizes for damage. Speaker 0 grants clearance. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss targets. Speaker 2 communicates with Hotel 26 and Crazy Horse 18 about engaging 8 individuals with RPGs and AK 47s. Speaker 0 gives instructions to move to the location for pictures. Speaker 1 confirms. Speaker 0 expresses satisfaction with the engagement. Speaker 2 communicates with Bushmaster 7.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Fire. Here Wednesday line. Let me know when you've gathered for 2. Item all up. Speaker 1: 2 zero two traffic, 2 60. Speaker 0: Come on. Fire. Horizon. Thank Speaker 1: you. Speaker 0: Six. 2. Speaker 2: Bushmaster 26. Bushmaster 26. We need to move time now. Speaker 0: Seven. Alright. We just engaged all 8 individuals. And we got 2. We're we're still firing. Got it. Got it. Speaker 1: Six. This is 26. We're moving. We got this. Oh, I'm sorry. Speaker 0: I was bypassing. Got damaged, Kyle. Sorry. Alright. You're clear. Alright. I'm just trying to find targets again. Speaker 1: Six. Master 6. This is Bushmaster 26. Speaker 0: Got a bunch of bodies laying there. Alright. We got about 8 individuals. Yeah. We got 1 guy 2 around down there, but, you know, we could definitely get a jump or shoot some more. Got it. 6. Hey. You shoot. I'll talk. Hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Speaker 2: Crazy horse 18, This is hotel 26 Speaker 0: over. Roger, currently engaging approximately 8 individuals, AIA, RPGs and AK 47. Speaker 2: Cell 2 6, you need to move to that location once crazy one is done and get pictures over. Speaker 0: 2 20 and the location. The hotel 26 crazy horse 18. Oh, yeah. There goes dead bastards. Nice. Nice. 26. Crazy horse 18. 6. Speaker 1: 2 Speaker 0: 2 Hotel 26, crazy horse 18. Speaker 2: Crazy. You're towards 18 Bushmaster 7. Go ahead.
Collateral Murder collateralmurder.wikileaks.org
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 7:16 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Archive: 1988 US State Department report on the birth of Hamas #Gaza #Hamas #Israel Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20140818011806/https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/88JERUSALEM3168_a.html#efmA8dA9H

Cable: 88JERUSALEM3168_a web.archive.org
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 6:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
According to a verified document from the Israeli Ministry of Intelligence, a plan suggests forcibly displacing Gaza civilians to Egypt for strategic gains. The three-stage process involves setting up tent cities in Sinai, creating a humanitarian corridor, and constructing permanent cities in northern Sinai with no return. Full document: rb.gy/g1k0d.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Verified document from Israeli Ministry of Intelligence on October 13 suggests forced displacement of Gaza civilians to Egypt would "yield positive and long term strategic results" The advisory document envisions a three stage process including the establishment of tent cities in Sinai and opening of humanitarian corridor, followed by construction of cities in northerm Sinai from which there would be no return #Gaza Link to full doc [עברית]: rb.gy/g1k0d

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's Ministry of Intelligence has reportedly issued a secret document proposing the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza to northern Sinai, Egypt. The plan includes instructing civilians to leave north Gaza, conducting sequential land operations, clearing routes across Rafah, and establishing tent cities in northern Sinai. The document, verified by an official from the Ministry, is advisory rather than binding. For more details, refer to the original document.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

A week after the Hamas attack, Israel's Ministry of Intelligence issued a secret ten-page document outlining the expulsion of the Palestinian population of Gaza to northern Sinai, in Egypt: 1. Instruct Palestinian civilians to vacate north Gaza ahead of land operations; 2. Sequential land operations from north to south Gaza; 3. Routes across Rafah to be left clear; 4. Establish tent cities in northern Sinai and construct cities to resettle Palestinians in Egypt The document has been verified by an official from the Ministry of Intelligence, according to the Hebrew website Mekomit which originally published the document. Mekomit noted that documents from the Ministry of Intelligence are advisory and not binding on the executive Link to full document [in Hebrew]: rb.gy/g1k0d

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 4:13 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

How US moved to block International Criminal Court referal for alleged Israeli war crimes after 2009 Goldstone report #Gaza #ICC Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20220627211601/https://search.wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/10STATE15722_a.html#efmAciAc8B8SCCO

Cable: 10STATE15722_a web.archive.org
Saved - October 16, 2023 at 11:06 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Israeli Defense Intelligence Chief Amos Yadlin in 2007: “Israel would be happy if Hamas took over Gaza because IDF could then deal with Gaza as a hostile state”, going on to downplay significance of Iran in Gaza “as long as they don't have a port." Link: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07TELAVIV1733_a.html

Full-text search wikileaks.org
Saved - October 15, 2023 at 12:27 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Israeli Defense Intelligence Chief Amos Yadlin in 2007: “Israel would be happy if Hamas took over Gaza because IDF could then deal with Gaza as a hostile state”, going on to downplay significance of Iran in Gaza “as long as they don't have a port." https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/07TELAVIV1733_a.htmlc

Full-text search wikileaks.org
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 8:10 PM

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

AI culture wars: Israeli government launch video of Twitter/Facebook "Command Centre", which monitors "all posts" for "anti-semitism" with "artificial intelligence" then lodges complaints e.g with "intelligence & law enforcement" in a "certain european country" or other officials

Video Transcript AI Summary
The system covers the entire Internet, including social networks like Facebook and Twitter. It identifies 200,000 suspect posts and tweets related to antisemitism daily, using artificial intelligence and machine learning. Approximately 10,000 antisemitic posts are identified each day. This information will now be made public, serving as a deterrent to antisemitism. We will be able to determine which city has the highest antisemitic internet activity and identify the top 10 antisemitic tweets and Twitter users. By understanding the causes behind spikes in antisemitism, we can take action. The command center in Tel Aviv is already operational, analyzing and sharing information with local authorities and municipalities to address antisemitic activities. This marks the official launch of the system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To give you the scope of the system, the system covers the entire, Internet right now to social networks, Facebook and Twitter. And it covers all the posts, all the tweets. Of them, it identifies every day 200,000 suspect posts and tweets that are suspected for antisemitism, Then it analyzes them using, artificial intelligence and machine learning and ultimately identifies roughly 10,000 antisemitic posts a day. As of now and forward, this information is gonna be made public. It in itself will be a great deterrent to antisemitism. Suddenly, we'll know which city is the most antisemite City, in terms of internet activity. We'll know who are the 10 top, anti Semitic tweets and Twitters. We'll know on a certain day, we see a spike in antisemitism. We'll be able to drill down and understand what caused it. Just by the fact of knowing all of this, it in and itself hopefully will shame people into acting better. Here in Tel Avivara specific location, it's up and running. This command center takes the information that is analyzed and created here and then acts. It could be, for example, identifying a specific Post that is calling for anti Semitic action and then notifying the local intelligence and law enforcement forces in a certain European country. It could be to tell the municipality of a certain city. And this This week, I might say that Manchester is one of the, highest anti Semitic anti Semite activities. So call up the the mayor and tell him, do something about this. So by knowing this information, we can act. And the the this group of analysts, within the command center, it's up and running as of now. So this is the official launch.
View Full Interactive Feed