TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @xGHOSTx990
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Saved - December 27, 2025 at 12:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts that Jews receive reparations, exploit gentiles to advance Israel, and that Jewish crime is hidden; they claim Jews spread false Holocaust narratives, deny gas chambers, and label the Holocaust a fabrication used to control history and education. They argue work camps had amenities, accuse Jews of wealth extraction, and claim “final solution” never existed, prompting ongoing denial and conspiracy claims.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Do jews still receive reparations from their fabricated German Holocaust? YES. They steal, plunder, and squeezing dry the gentiles as much as they can. Jews use these plundered resources to advance the state of Israel and impede the rise of nationalism. https://t.co/BcxKdAUbpr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation touches on a sequence of controversial assertions that connect politics, finance, war, and media narratives, followed by a shift to fitness industry transparency. The speakers discuss economics, implying that there was “complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world” within a couple of years, and they urge asking why this happened by examining “the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented,” insisting there is “a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction.”
They then move to a claim about banking and a Rothschild figure, stating that after the banking incident, there was “literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back,” and assert that this is “probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off.” The dialogue continues with a provocative assertion that “war is the most profitable thing of all time,” adding that “the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing.” This leads to a claim that there would be money continuing to be made off the Holocaust, suggesting that “they're still making money off it,” and that “they use that” as a shield to justify ongoing actions “so it's like, I think it is important to take it on.”
The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, even if challenging the Holocaust is controversial, arguing that truth is important and that speaking it out matters because it reveals what is “true.” They contend that in society there is a problem when “we can't talk about the truth,” and they connect this to current events or narratives about accountability and transparency.
The discussion then shifts to the speaker’s identity as a fitness influencer who focuses on exposing fraud in the fitness industry, confirming that this is part of their mission and past. The conversation frames the same lens of transparency: just owning flaws or questionable actions and speaking the truth. They argue that some fitness figures “clearly [are] juiced out of their mind” and tell kids they are “natural,” which the speakers view as a problem. They acknowledge that people should be aware that looking like that is not natural, while clarifying that taking steroids does not make someone a bad person; rather, there should be honesty about it.
Finally, they begin a closing line noting that “everyone makes” claims or judgments—indicating a broader stance on accountability and openness across both public discourse and personal branding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Boom, like complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world Right.
Speaker 1: In a couple years. And then all you have to really do is ask yourself why and then just look at the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented. And there's a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction.
Speaker 0: After the banking, arrested, literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back. This is this is probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off.
Speaker 1: I mean, too, also, if you think about war is the most profitable thing of all time. You know, the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing.
Speaker 0: That's crazy. They're no one
Speaker 1: they're still making money off it.
Speaker 0: There'd be they use that. People like, oh, you shouldn't take people tell me, oh, you shouldn't challenge the Holocaust, you know, because it's just why it's a bad look. But it is important. One for truth. Two, because they're still getting money and they use it as a shield.
They use it as, oh, the Holocaust so we can do this. So it's like, I think it is important to take it on. You're like, oh, it's good. You know, you're gonna get called a Nazi taking that on, but it's like, but it's what's true. Yeah.
That's important to me. What's truth is important.
Speaker 1: And that's when you have a problem in society. We can't talk about the truth. I think in any regard.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, you you kinda came on as a fitness influencer. I didn't know a lot about you, but your whole thing is about exposing the truth and fraud in the fitness industry. Correct?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: It was kind of always your past. So you're just doing the
Speaker 1: same transparency. Just owning like if you have flaws or you're doing certain things, just owning it and speaking the truth and
Speaker 0: the transparency about it. So these guys are clearly juiced out of their mind. They're telling kids, oh, I'm natural. That is a problem. It's like you can't look like that naturally, and people should be aware of that.
It's like, it doesn't mean they're bad people for taking the steroids, but a little honesty should be there.
Speaker 1: Because I think everyone makes
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a shift toward reparations in Europe, spurred in part by United States pressure, which enabled funding for European Jewish culture. In Sweden, despite its wartime neutrality and lack of losses, Social Democrat prime minister Johan Pershing and deputy secretary Jan Eliason felt Sweden bore a burden from its neutrality, including allowing Nazi transit to Norway with devastating effects on Norwegian Jews. This led to the creation of an institute to reignite European Jewish culture: PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden. The aim was to revitalize European Jewish life, with Annaly traveling across Europe to recruit participants, providing Eurail train tickets to travel and study.
Participants arrived from many countries and formed a distinctive group described as the “disc assimilators,” a generation aware of why they are Jewish and literate. In 2014, the Glamsted Declaration arose, describing a group of activists, thinkers, and artists committed to renewing Jewish life and culture in Europe. They state that matters relating to antisemitism and the State of Israel have influenced Jewish interaction with the wider European community. They believe Jewish thought and experience can contribute to a more just and democratic Europe, that Jewish communities can model minority citizenship based on integration without assimilation, and that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by examining universalizing claims through a multiplicity of voices. The passage ends with a rhetorical question: “Why did this make me cry?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole era of reparations began. Again, much under the the pressure of The United States, nevertheless, European countries began to come to terms with the role that they had played in the Holocaust and reparations beginning. Now why was that so important for the flourishing of European jewelry? Because among other things, it meant that there was some funding that was available that wasn't before. Something unique took place in Sweden.
Sweden was neutral during the war. There was no legal, thankfully. There was no loss of life. There was no loss of property. But because of who you see on your left, then Social Democrat prime minister, Johan Pershing, and the secretary his deputy secretary general, Jan Eliason, what he what bothered him was he didn't feel that Sweden was that being neutral was such a virtue.
In fact, just the opposite. He felt that Sweden carried a great burden. It did allow after all the Brazilian things. It allowed the transport of Nazi force forces over Sweden territory into Norway with devastating results for the Norwegian Jews. And he began to talk to the then two heads of the community, Gabriel Berwitz, who you also see on your screen, and Leno Bosner Karoszik.
And what was determined was that an institute would be formed to mandate that would be mandated to reignite Jewish culture in Europe. Eureka, and Liard, the next step. PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, was formed with if you wanna have some sleepless nights, to become the director of an institute, his mandate is to reignite European Jewish culture. Annaly traveled around Europe to try to recruit some participants, some students for this new institute, which was going to reignite European Jewish. We gave them train tickets, euro euro rail tickets, and said, go out.
Do this. And they did. But as well, I traveled all around Europe. Oh, actually, I don't know why we lost all of it. Anyway, all of oh, there we go.
People showed up from all sorts of countries, but there was something unusual about these people. And who are the who came to the institute? We began to call them the disc assimilators. Not only are these remarkable, this diss diss diss assimilating generation of people who know white why they're Jewish and have become literate. In 2014, I'm only happy you were part of this group, the Glamsted Declaration.
We are a group of activists, thinkers, and artists united by a commitment to the renewal of Jewish life and culture in Europe. In recent years, matters relating to antisemitism, the Shewan state Of Israel, come to define Jewish interaction with the larger European community. We strongly believe, in particular, that Jewish thought and experience can make important contributions to the ongoing endeavor for a more just and democratic year. Jewish thought and experience have important insights to contribute to the European Jewish community. Jewish communities can provide a model for minority citizenship based on the principles of integration without assimilation, and this is where the cheers came.
Last, not not not least, we believe that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by providing examples of how universalizing claims are constantly examined with the multiplicity of voices. Why? Why did this make me cry?
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Ben Shapiro: Reparations don’t work. Charlamagne: They worked for Jewish people. (They *still* receive HoIocaust reparations) Shapiro: Erm, uh, that's totally different! Israel took $500b from America (and $30B since Oct 7). It still begs for more. https://t.co/0AV6NH9tqA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that on a public policy level, reparative policies are not as effective as people want. He cites Holocaust reparations from Germany as an example, noting there was a huge debate in Israel over whether survivors should accept reparations, with the view that accepting payments could be seen as expiating past sins or buying off history. He asserts that reparations are not the reason Israel has become economically successful; rather, success comes from a determined effort to meet the meritocratic standards of success.
He then discusses US foreign assistance to Israel, calling it a bargain for the United States because Israel “doesn’t need the money,” and contrasts this with other fiscal considerations. He mentions a claim that the black community would gladly take foreign assistance, though he notes he cannot speak for them. He provides a related financial context: “it’s like $3,000,000,000 a year” in some form of aid, and adds comparative U.S. military expenditure on bases abroad—“we spend $6,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Japan, $5,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Germany.” He emphasizes that a substantial amount of U.S. money helps other countries and underlines that Israel does not simply receive money but receives military product produced in the United States.
The speaker explains that the relationship includes intelligence sharing and Israel’s development of its own technology, which the U.S. benefits from through disseminating tech they develop. He gives a concrete example: helmets used by F-35 pilots, noting these are Israeli-developed helmets, illustrating technology add-ons that the U.S. can leverage. He insists that the notion of a zero-sum dynamic—money sent out with nothing in return—is inaccurate, because the arrangement yields reciprocal benefits through defense collaboration and technology development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that on a on a sort of public policy level, reparative policies don't tend to be nearly as effective as as people want them to be, historically speaking. What Jewish people? In in what way? Jewish people have received reparations. You mean Holocaust reparations, for example, from Germany?
So I think that, first of all, there was a gigantic fight, actually, in Israel over whether Holocaust survivors should accept reparations from Germany, because the idea was that it's allowing them to expiate their sins of the past, they shouldn't be allowed to expiate those sins, it's and allowing them to buy off the history for $50 or whatever it is. But that is not the reason why Israel has become successful economically, like just on a success level. The reality is that cutting people checks rarely makes them more successful from the government. What usually makes people more successful is a is a determined attempt to become the things that the meritocracy demands of you. Right?
So there were there were no long, you know, long And do scale think The US foreign assistance for Israel has helped financially? Well, mean, The US foreign assistance for Israel actually is a bargain for The United States because Israel doesn't need the money. I've said this before I mean We'll take it. That's fine. The black community would gladly take it.
That's in it. I can't speak for it. It's like $3,000,000,000 a year. We should point out at this point that we spend, I think, $6,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Japan, 5,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Germany. We spend an awful lot of money that helps an awful lot of other countries.
Israel has to spend all of that money, by way, in The United States on military product. So all of the money that we send to we actually don't send money to Israel, send military product to Israel that is made in The United States, and so it actually is a subsidy to the American defense industry, and there is a deal with Israel where Israel does intelligence sharing and also develops its own tech and can't disseminate it to the world. So for example, the the helmets that our f 35 pilots use, those are Israeli developed helmets, like, that we can see over the horizon, for example. That's because Israel developed technological add ons. So the idea that this is sort of like a zero sum, the money goes out, we get nothing back, that's actually not That's actually not true.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish crime statistics have been historically covered up and continues to this day
@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman
The only ethnic group where crimes don't count, LITERALLY. https://t.co/mKRYj8XagZ
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish crimes against the nations and making them collapsed Blood libel Spreading Heresy in god Rejecting god Usury Etc…
@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman
From the U.S. Department of Justice: jews, despite being the lowest in population, commit the most white-collar crimes (e.g. fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, money laundering, bribery, cyber scams, etc). jewish crimes are then entered as “White” crimes in the statistical data. They often escape their crimes and take a one-way flight to israel. But if by any chance they are captured and go to prison, they are placed in a special prison with a fully kosher kitchen and receive special amenities reserved for jews. They eat and live as if it's a 5-star hotel.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camps list of amenities
@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore
Concentration camp amenities during WW2 1. Orchestras and musical performances 2. Soccer fields and sports facilities 3. Swimming pools 4. Brothels 5. Libraries 6. Art classes and workshops 7. Theaters for plays and films 8. Post offices 9. Canteens for purchasing goods https://t.co/yzoAHr1ssP
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn How the fabrication of the German holocaust was imbedded into humanity
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“The “Holocaust” was an organized psychological campaign that began in 1941…. When you go through the old OSS (OG CIA) documents, it’s essentially a guidebook on how to create rumors.” -Cory Hughes List all the easily debunked rumors from the Holocaust. -Brain Bashing Machine -Bone Grinders -Mobile Gas Chambers -Worlds Largest Ovens -Nazi Spanking machine -Bars of Jewish soap
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that the conversation about the Holocaust has been framed improperly and that there is an organized psychological warfare campaign that began in 1941 with the first rumors of gassings at the basement of Block 11 in Auschwitz. He claims those stories are infused with OSS propaganda points, noting that the OSS doctrine on rumors is essentially a guidebook on how to create and spread rumors, and that the job of the OSS was to spread rumors. He says they created and that they will get to that next, providing slides to put gas chamber stories in context. He notes that the other allegations will make the gas chambers clearer.
Speaker 0 acknowledges technical issues with the live stream. Speaker 1 proceeds with a series of claimed devices and methods, all of which he says were testified to under oath at Nuremberg.
- The brain-bashing machine: the prisoner was placed against a wall with an iron plate that was slowly lowered onto his head; the plate contained a ramrod that shot out and delivered a blow to the back of the head, knocking him dead; the iron plate was operated by a foot lever in a corner of the room.
- Bone grinders: allegedly a bone grinder could grind bones of 200 persons at a time, producing 200 cubic meters of bone flour; the claim emphasizes explicit concrete detail to enhance believability.
- Mobile gas chambers: arose from mobile delousing stations; these mobile gas chambers do not exist; the claim suggests the mobile chambers were created to account for the numbers claimed and to enable driving around and stuffing people into a mobile gas chamber.
- World’s largest ovens: testified ovens could fit 2,500 to 3,000 bodies; bones were smashed into small particles by bulldozers and the ashes strewn over the yard so that no traces should be left; the claim is used to counter assertions that the Nazis destroyed all evidence.
- Nazi spanking machine: a punishment of 50 blows with a stick on the loins; administered with a swinging apparatus manipulated by an SS; a machine that knocked you in the balls controlled by a lever.
- Gloves and pocketbooks of human skin: claimed to exist but said to be long since debunked.
- Plucking of the pubic hairs: August 1942 order for prisoners to have all hair removed from armpits and around genitals; prisoners supposedly spent the night plucking hair by hand; guards killed four prisoners and wounded three by rifle fire the next morning; the claim is that no prisoner received a razor, though the Germans supposedly knew they had none.
- Torture cabinets: alleged that a group of prisoners were locked up on New Year’s Eve 1945 due to cold conditions; described as a psychological device.
- Bars of Jewish soap: rumors first emerged in World War I; this is presented as another example of the types of propaganda.
Speaker 1 closes by noting that the aim of including a humorous twist was part of how rumors were crafted, and that the OSS embedded such elements in their propaganda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Just real quick. We're talking about the Holocaust, the
Speaker 1: I was saying that the conversation we've had on the Holocaust ever for for all time has been framed improperly. And while, yes, a lot of the things that seem overtly false have been called out on their face, there is something that links all these things together, right? This is an organized psychological warfare campaign that began all the way back in 1941 with the first rumors of the gassings at the basement of Block 11 in Auschwitz, right, which when you dig into those stories they're really quite hilarious because all of the OSS type propaganda points are inserted into these stories. The striking concrete detail, you know, the unique cultural heritage stuff baked into the stories. When you go through the old OSS documents, particularly the doctrine regarding rumors, it's basically a guidebook on how to create and craft a rumor and how to get it to spread and that's what these guys did.
The job of the OSS was to spread rumors and that's exactly what they did. They created and that's actually what we're gonna get to next.
Speaker 0: I have
Speaker 1: a couple slides I want to show you at the just to put in context the gas chamber stories because when you see the other allegations that were made, it's like, oh, I understand the gas chambers now. Right?
Speaker 0: Yeah. It gets ridiculous. Yeah. Yeah. And I apologize, people in Rumble.
They'll miss the beginning. I'm brand new to doing live stuff, the mess ups, but I think they'll they'll be able to jump in pretty they'll be able to figure out what's going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So alright. The brain bashing machine. This is the first one we'll talk about. So the prisoner as before was placed against the wall with an iron plate that was then slowly lowered onto his head.
The prisoner was under the impression that he was gonna be measured for height, and the iron plate contained a ramrod which shot out and suddenly poleaxed the prisoner with a blow to the back of the head. He then dropped dead. The iron plate was operated by a foot lever in a corner of the room. Right? You ever see you ever hear about this in a history book?
Speaker 0: Nope. That that that one didn't go. These are the ones they tried getting.
Speaker 1: Right. But you have to remember, every single one of these that I'm gonna read off today was testified to under oath at Nuremberg.
Speaker 0: This could be what was taught in our schools if things have gone slightly different.
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. But you'll see, this is nothing more than wartime propaganda. Yeah. Bone grinders.
So allegedly, had a bone grinder that could grind bones of 200 persons at a time as has been proved to the commission and as a constant yield of 200 cubic meters of bone flour. You see the the the explicit concrete detail that they put in these things. To make it makes it more believable. Right? The less vague a story, the more believable.
Mobile gas chambers, this is also nonsense. This mobile gas chambers arose from the mobile delousing stations that they had, and we'll get into Zyklon B later. But the mobile gas chambers, they don't exist. Part part of the reason they came up with this was because they couldn't account for the numbers that they were claiming, and the mobile gas chambers allowed them to break from the confines of the camps and go drive around and literally stuff people in a mobile gas chamber. Really, it's it's utterly ridiculous.
Mhmm. World's largest ovens. Someone testified they had ovens that could fit 2,500 to 3,000 bodies. This is my favorite part and this is something that everyone really needs to grasp. The bones were smashed into small particles by bulldozers and the ashes strewn over the yard so that no traces should be left.
So anytime people try to tell you that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence, what they're really saying is that they don't have any evidence. It's the exact same thing. Nazi spanking machine.
Speaker 0: Spanking machine. I haven't heard this one.
Speaker 1: One of the most usual punishments was 50 blows with a stick on the loins. They were administered with such a machine I saw with a swinging apparatus manipulated by an SS. So a machine that knocked you in the balls controlled by a lever and an SS man. Right? The gloves and pocketbooks of human skin, this is long since been debunked.
Again, the idea is that this is such a horrific thing that the people should turn on their own government for doing such stuff.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Alright. The plucking of the pubic hairs. This one is great. Thus, for example, in August 1942, the prisoners were ordered by the German staff of the camp to have all their hair removed from their armpits and around their genitals as otherwise they would be shot. Not one prisoner.
Yeah. Not one prisoner received a razor from the Germans, though the Germans knew well that they had none. The prisoners spent the whole of the night plucking out their hair with their hands and assisting one another. However, in the morning, the guards killed four prisoners and wounded three by rifle fire. Right?
So this again never made it into the history books because it's wartime propaganda. Torture cabinets. Same thing. You know, they locked a bunch of guys, on New Year's Eve nineteen forty five, which they put in here New Year's Eve nineteen forty five because that's supposed to be especially cold, right, from a psychological perspective. Right?
Oh my god. They did it to them on Christmas or New Year's Eve or you see what I'm saying? Yeah. So, like, the OSS had fun when they did this, and part of their creating and crafting rumors was that they would include a humorous twist when possible and for some reason that was baked into their system. Alright.
The bars of Jewish Bars
Speaker 0: of soap. Remember getting taught that one as a kid.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So the bars of Jewish soap, these rumors first came out of World War one. In World War one, they had pretty explicit
Speaker 0: methodology
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3ws spread fake and false stories about what happened to them. Always playing a character: The Victim
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
One of the made up ways Nazis killed Jews was that they would make them climb up trees and then cut them down with the Jew mid tree. 😂 Obviously it’s all fake atrocity propaganda, but that didn’t stop these lies from being spread under oath at Nuremberg. Nuremberg is a lie. https://t.co/ztuISrg6Iv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a range of alleged Nazi atrocities and their subsequent debunking. The conversation opens with the claim that Treblinka never had gas chambers, only steam chambers, used to steam lousing facilities, with the implication that steam chambers could be repurposed for a homicidal use. They describe shock chambers as allegedly present at Treblinka, where the floor was electrified and people were killed by being walked into the room.
The speakers then recount a “death by falling trees” method, in which several Soviet prisoners would be forced to climb a tree, and others would have to saw it down, causing the prisoners to fall and be killed. They move to “murder by atomic weapons,” with a claim that research into atomic energy produced an experiment where a small village, with temporary structures, housed 20,000 Jews who were eradicated almost instantaneously by a newly invented weapon, leaving no trace. They emphasize there was “no evidence again.” An “orchestra of death” is mentioned, including a description of executions in the Yanov camp carried out to the strains of the death tango, conducted by professor Strix with bandmaster Munt, and with a dog named Rex trained to harass and tear apart living persons.
The discussion then touches on “gas chambers disguised as showers,” aligning this with wartime propaganda, and moves to “historical forgeries” claimed to have been displayed at Buchenwald, described as the creation of the OSS psych warfare team. The timing is noted as right after the war, suggesting these displays were created to illustrate Nazi horrors. The claim is that most of this material has since been debunked, with some pieces ending up at the Buchenwald Museum, which allegedly clings to the legend that the materials are real. The speakers note that the shrunken heads were fake, made from goat skin and horse hair, but claim that the lampshades are still insisted upon as real by some sources, despite being debunked. They conclude with a rhetorical question about why such things would be faked, implying a critical stance toward the authenticity of these legends.
Overall, the transcript catalogs a set of sensational Holocaust-related claims (steam chambers, shock chambers, death by trees, atomic weapon extermination, orchestras, gas chambers disguised as showers, and shrunken heads) and juxtaposes them with statements that many of these claims have been debunked or identified as forgeries, while noting that some depictions persist in certain museum displays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Morph the story because they're they're good at recycling stuff. You know? It's the oldest story and the newest clothes. So steam chambers. This is a good one because it was never alleged at Treblinka that there were ever gas chambers until around the nineteen seventies.
It was always attested to that they had steam chambers. The reason for the steam chambers is because they had steamed the lousing facilities, and therefore they knew that they had something in the camp that they could put a homicidal twist on. Shock chambers, allegedly and this was at Treblinka. Allegedly the floor was electrified in a room and they would walk people in there and shock them to death. The death by falling trees, this is a good one.
They invented the following method of murder. Several Soviet prisoners would be forced to climb a tree, and others had to saw it down. The prisoners would fall together with the tree and be killed.
Speaker 1: Is this ridiculous how absurd this stuff is, but this could easily be you said this is all under oath testified?
Speaker 0: Yes. All at Nuremberg. Murder by atomic weapons. So they're talking about, the research they did in atomic energy, and he says, yeah, the purpose was, of the experiment was to find a way to quickly and completely destroy people without delay and troubleshooting and again gassing and burning as it had been carried out with this experiment. A village small village was provisionally erected with temporary structures, and in it, 20,000 Jews were put.
By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 Jews were eradicated almost instantaneously and in such a way that left no trace. Right? There's the there's the we
Speaker 1: don't have any evidence again.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Exactly. Right? Orchestra of death.
Speaker 1: Oh my god.
Speaker 0: So they had to justify why there were orchestras in the camps because there were orchestras in every camp. Mhmm. Right? In all the camps. So here it says, in the Yanov camp, the executions are carried out to the strains of the death tango played by an orchestra conducted by professor Strix, an internee in the camp together with his band master, Munt.
And it says, behind him is his dog Rex, known to us through many interrogations as having been trained to harass living persons and later tear them to pieces. I'm assuming that's Rex, that little that little
Speaker 1: dog Rex. He was like a bitch's killing machine. It makes sense they created Hollywood now.
Speaker 0: And then gas chambers disguised as showers. Right? So, obviously, gas chambers disguised as showers falls right in line with all the other wartime propaganda. And then we have the historical forgeries. You know, all this stuff was, displayed at Buchenwald, and this is all fake.
This is all creation of the OSS psych warfare team.
Speaker 1: This was right after the war. Correct? They brought this out to show the horrors they'd done, and it was all created, like you said, by the propaganda team.
Speaker 0: Right. And so all this has been debunked over the years. Most of this stuff has disappeared. Some of it ended up at the Buchenwald Museum. I was actually at the Buchenwald website earlier today, and they actually cling to the legend that this stuff is real.
Speaker 1: Wow. And it's pretty much been debunked almost Right.
Speaker 0: Proven. The only thing they say is fake is the is the shrunken heads. The shrunken heads were made from, like, goat skin and horse hair.
Speaker 1: So they still try saying the lampshades are real even
Speaker 0: though
Speaker 1: they've been debunked. Oh.
Speaker 0: A 100%.
Speaker 1: So, yeah, all
Speaker 0: this stuff is fake. And why would you fake this stuff? I don't know. But, you know, if you're going to
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The story about j3ws being made of soap and lampshades is a total fabrication and lie. But they still promote it TODAY. https://t.co/RFb2Zq1KKB
Video Transcript AI Summary
In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Father: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming?
Theodore: Tears good.
Father: Something that matter, Theodore?
Theodore: Can I ask you a weird question?
Father: Sure.
Theodore: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved.
Father: Underground? What is wrong with you?
Theodore: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that?
Father: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades.
We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming?
Speaker 1: Tears good.
Speaker 0: Something that matter, Theodore?
Speaker 1: Can I ask you a weird question?
Speaker 0: Sure.
Speaker 1: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved.
Speaker 0: Underground? What is wrong with you?
Speaker 1: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that?
Speaker 0: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades.
We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
These fake shrunken heads and “lampshades” made of Jews were used as atrocity propaganda at the end of WW2. They are still considered “real” by established authorities, but are simply used to extrapolate reparations from White countries to support a country that shouldn’t exist.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Germans was the most advanced nation. And had developed gasses that were deadly but never utilized. J3ws actually think you’re stupid enough to fool and be lied to.
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“The Nazis had developed Sarin gas and Tabun. These are nasty deadly nerve gasses. The idea that they would use something like Zyklon B, which was an essential part of maintaining the health of the inmates, when they had sarin and tabun is ridiculous.” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/XEEIYtKCLR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Nazi chemical capabilities and the use of Zyklon B. Speaker 0 states that Nazis had developed sarin gas and tabun, "nasty deadly nerve gases," and argues that the idea they would actually use Zyklon B, which was essential for maintaining health in the camps, is ridiculous. Speaker 1 agrees, saying it seems ridiculous and that “the whole story” appears ridiculous once examined.
Speaker 1 adds that years ago they investigated because it was illegal, noting changes over time, and that they felt compelled to keep quiet. Speaker 0 then shifts to logistics, noting that there are documents on trains that came in, the amounts of coke used in the crematoria, and that everything is well documented, including the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz. He mentions Red Cross–related deaths as part of the documentation but the sentence trails off: “The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nazis had developed sarin gas and they had developed tabun and these are nasty deadly nerve gases and so the idea that they would actually use something like Zyklon b which was an absolutely essential part of maintaining the health of the people in the camps when they had sarin and tabun to me is is is ridiculous.
Speaker 1: No. Yeah. It just seem it seems ridiculous that they would do that.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: It's like The the whole story, if you actually start looking is like ridiculous. I mean, years ago, I looked because I was because I told it was illegal and you looked if it but things are a lot different different back then. I was like, oh, I guess I just gotta keep my mouth shut on this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. There's a thing that they didn't really incorporate into the stories and that's logistics. Right? We have all the documents on all the trains that came in, the amounts of coke that were used in the crematoria. You know everything is pretty well documented, the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz.
The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The German holocaust main points debunked here:
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
THREAD 🧵 9/13 Posts Europa: The Last Battle [Part 8] • The Holocaust – Expulsion vs Extermination • The Origin Of The “Six Million” Figure • The Allied Psychological Warfare • The Labor and Internment Camps • The Gas-Chambers • The Soap and Lampshades • The International Red Cross Report
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents an extensive compilation of claims from a group of speakers arguing that the established Holocaust narrative is false or exaggerated and that many historical incidents have been misrepresented or fabricated by Allied propaganda, Soviet influence, and Jewish-led organizations. The speakers frame Holocaust revisionism as a legitimate scholarly effort rather than denial, asserting that revisionists do not dispute that Jews and others suffered and died in the war, but dispute the scale, methods, and specifics of extermination.
Key asserted points and claims
- Holocaust definition and revisionism
- The Holocaust is described as a belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered primarily by gassing in “shower rooms,” a narrative the speakers say is amplified by Hollywood, media, and schools. A growing movement of scientists, historians, engineers, journalists, and free-speech activists is portrayed as revisionist, though often branded as “Holocaust deniers” to discourage discourse. Revisionists are said not to deny persecution, deprivation of civil rights, deportation, internment, forced labor, or deaths in camps and ghettos, including deaths from disease; they also say that many victims died in ways other than genocide and that many victims’ dignity is not denied.
- Internment and civilian camps in the United States
- After Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 people of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast were interned by Executive Order 9066; the text claims this restricted freedoms, required identity cards, and denied compensation or war reparations. The narrative includes accounts of interned individuals describing camp life, guard presence, and harsh conditions.
- General wartime devastation and context
- The war is described as a conflict that would not have occurred if “international jury” had not declared war on Germany in 1933, with emphasis on typhus, subversion, and crowded camps as drivers of disease and death. The speakers stress that millions died across battlefields, ships, and cities, and that propaganda surrounding German crimes obscures Allied or Soviet misdeeds.
- Claims about typhus, gas chambers, and cremation
- Typhus epidemics are said to explain many deaths in camps; Cyclone B (hydrogen cyanide) is claimed to have been used for delousing and pest control rather than execution, with several speakers arguing that gas chambers as homicidal devices did not exist or were technically infeasible. They assert there is no scientific proof of gassing, no German documents proving extermination plans, and that cremation and delousing procedures served health purposes rather than execution purposes.
- Expert testimonies and forensics are cited (e.g., Leuchter, Rudolf, Lift, Lindsay) to support the claim that the gas chambers could not have functioned as execution facilities, noting technical impossibilities such as lack of explosion-proof features, gasketed doors, or proper gas delivery systems.
- Specific camp narratives and testimonies
- The camps are described as having been centers of labor, medical care, and even cultural activity, with accounts of weddings, births, nurseries, orchestras, libraries, theater performances, and recreational activities. Some testimonies describe attempts to maintain humanity and morale under harsh conditions, including a piano in Block 1, children’s art, and soccer games.
- Several testimonies challenge the image of mass exterminations, claiming instead that most deaths resulted from disease, starvation, and Allied bombing, and that Red Cross and Vatican inquiries found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers.
- A number of survivor testimonials are presented as quotations or paraphrases challenging the notion of mass murder in gas chambers, with some individuals denying personal knowledge of gas chambers or mass killings.
- Documentary, legal, and scholarly disputes
- The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) and other revisionist scholars are described as measuring and challenging the established narrative, sometimes facing legal or financial pressure. The transcript cites various researchers and forensics teams (e.g., Leuchter, Krakov, Farison, Groff, Farison, Larsson) as having concluded that homicidal gassings were not technically feasible in the cited facilities.
- It is claimed that many postwar figures and witnesses provided testimonies or stories later recognized as unreliable or fabricated, including famous Holocaust survivors whose accounts are presented as inconsistent or false. Names and cases (e.g., Herman Rosenblatt, Anne Frank, Elie Wiesel) are invoked to illustrate alleged fraud or manipulation, though these claims contradict well-established historical records.
- Propaganda, media, and the so-called “Holocaust industry”
- The text asserts that the Holocaust narrative is used as a tool to enforce globalist policy, promote multiculturalism, and suppress nationalist sentiments among white Europeans. It claims that ongoing denazification efforts, legal penalties for questioning the Holocaust, and control over media and online platforms are designed to suppress dissent and promote a one-sided portrayal.
- There is a claim that “atrocity propaganda” and black propaganda have been used to shape public perception, with references to Sefton Delmer and Allied psychological warfare, and accusations that postwar trials and media representations were heavily biased or manipulated.
- Population counts, mortality figures, and documentary evidence
- Several sections contest the veracity of the commonly cited death tolls, the reliability of Red Cross and other international communications, and the authenticity of diaries and eyewitness testimonies. The transcript asserts that the Nuremberg trials did not use physical or technical evidence to establish gas chamber existence and that some documents used as proof were mistranslated or contextualized wrongly.
- The piece repeatedly emphasizes that millions of Jews did not die in the camps, that the “6,000,000” figure is a symbolic or religious number, and that high-profile Holocaust narratives are part of a constructed orthodoxy.
- Final framing
- The speakers position Holocaust revisionism as a defense of free speech and historical inquiry, arguing that questioning the official narrative is essential to truth. They claim laws against denial suppress inquiry and that truth should stand on its own merits without legal protection. They also suggest that conflicting accounts, forged documents, and political agendas have shaped the popular memory of World War II.
Note on structure and tone
- The transcript interweaves personal testimonials, expert opinions, documentary references, and polemical assertions. It repeatedly contrasts “revisionists” with conventional accounts, often asserting that mainstream portrayals are driven by propaganda, financial interests, or political goals. The overall thrust is to challenge the conventional understanding of the Holocaust, question the evidentiary basis for extermination claims, and highlight alleged inconsistencies in survivor narratives and official records.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Holocaust is the term used to spread the belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered by the Germans during World War two, primarily by gassing in makeshift gas chambers deceptively discussed as shower rooms. This narrative is often repeated in Hollywood, by the media and in the public school systems. However, a growing movement of brave scientists, historians, engineers, journalists and other free speech activists have investigated the official politically correct Holocaust story and found it to be exaggerated and even false. These brave people are today called revisionists but are often denounced as holocaust deniers by the media. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse and discussion about this controversial subject.
These revisionists do not dispute that Jews were persecuted, deprived of civil rights, deported, interned, and forced to work in concentration camps, or that Jews died in those camps and ghettos during the war when diseases became a major problem. Neither do they dispute that criminal communist partisans, which a majority of were Jews, were also killed by shooting and hanging during the war. The revisionists do not deny these Jews and other victims of the war their dignity. They do not deny the victims to be remembered and they do not deny to show compassion for any of the victims. No matter how they died, each and every one of these deaths was a tragedy as were the deaths of millions of others during this horrific war.
Millions of people, mostly Europeans, suffered and died horrible deaths on battlefields, on the high seas, and in firebomb cities during a conflict that most certainly would never have happened had international jury not declared war on Germany in 1933. The evidence that the revisions used against the official holocaust narrative are numerous. We will now go through some of the most convincing of them. During World War two, enemies were interned in concentration camps to avoid attempts at subversion against nation. As an After the attack on Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 Japanese people who lived on the Pacific Coast were interned by Democrat President Roosevelt with no crime other than being born Japanese.
Executive order 9066 signed by president Franklin Delano Roosevelt was issued on a premise that anyone of Japanese, German, and Italian descent could not be trusted and must be treated as an enemy. They were viewed not as individual people, but as a menace to be dealt with harshly. Thus, thousands of Americans of Japanese, Italian and German ethnicity were forcibly relocated and thrown into American concentration camps. Some were even forced to abandon their own homes and businesses. By rail car they were shipped off to the concentration camps over a thousand miles away.
They were placed inside barbed wire fences with machine guns pointed down at them from watchtowers. They slept inside bug infested barracks and they were denied adequate medicines, shelter and supplies.
Speaker 1: You know, we had this chain link fence all around the camp. And we lived maybe a quarter of a block away from the fence. And the fence was guarded by soldiers. They walked back and forth with their guns on their shoulders. I went up to the fence, and I heard a rustling in the grass.
I really was kind of wistful for what was outside the fence and thinking, you know, I used to be able to do
Speaker 0: Roosevelt wartime law restricted the freedoms and required identity cards for these prisoners. None of these inmates were ever compensated for the loss of property or the time they spent in concentration camps. No war reparations were paid to them, and no movies were dedicated to them. American World War II posters and other propaganda materials centered on race, which turned the war into a race war. They pounded it into the public's head that the Japanese and Germans were less than human, subhuman, even akin to rats.
These caused numerous atrocities against civilians during the war as the American soldier was taught that these people were not even human.
Speaker 2: All of the camps they built were in isolated spots.
Speaker 0: 10 of them scattered throughout the American West and a couple in Arkansas.
Speaker 3: Park Mountain, Poston, and Tule Lake were the largest. Tule Lake also housed those whose loyalty the government specifically questioned. The War Relocation Authority or WRA called them relocation centers.
Speaker 2: I remember when they would say, well, you're being interned for your own protection. Well, as a 10, 11 year old kid, I knew that if I were in here for my own protection, why are the machine guns pointing in at us and not out?
Speaker 4: We heard this young young man shouting and saying, as I recall something about they couldn't keep him there, that he was he was an American and he started walking out and the guard who was probably about 15 feet from him, just shot him in the stomach.
Speaker 0: Concentration camps were in fact not unusual at the time. Finland and even neutral Sweden also interned communist in concentration camps, since communists could not be trusted. It was actually the British Jewish financiers who invented the concentration camps in Burr in October 1899 when they looked for gold and diamond in South Africa. In 1933, when international Jewry had declared war upon Germany, they formally established themselves as an enemy of Germany, which according to international law, gave Germany the legal right to disarm and intern the German Jews. After the repeated attempts of subversion, murders, and terror against the German people, the Jews had made themselves into enemies of the German nation.
The National Socialists logically considered Jews as a direct threat to national security. Jews were overwhelmingly overrepresented in communist subversion. Jews with internationalist, communist, sinus, and Talmudic leanings were essentially operating as a fifth column and a Trojan horse within Germany, trying to destabilize the country for the Bolsheviks to take over. The Germans knew about the Jewish forces behind the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and the Red Terror that followed. Germany would be next in line, and hadn't the Germans stopped the Jewish Bolsheviks, the whole of Europe would have fallen.
So this is why the communists, the greater part of which were Jewish, were interned in labor camps to get useful work out of them during the war until they could be deported.
Speaker 5: When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tanzil of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schonfeldt, a Jew who Cordell Hall sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so called camps of political prisoners. He wrote back that he found them in very fine conditions.
They were in excellent shape. Everybody treated well, and they were filled with communists. Because the Jews happened to be maybe 98% of the communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, ministers, labor leaders, masons, and others who had international affiliation.
Speaker 0: Typhus, a fatal disease caused by the Rickettsia bacteria, ravaged the armies of both World War I and World War II and also claimed the lives of prisoners in those labor camps. Typhus has historically always been linked to wars and crowded conditions and is spread by external parasites such as lice, fleas, and ticks. The inmates in the German camps would have their hair in the louse through chemical showers or have their hair shaved off. Clothes and shoes were also discarded and replaced. Cyclone B was an insecticide and pesticide that killed the lice that carried typhus.
This chemical was used to improve the inmate's health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality.
Speaker 6: Zykton was used for a hygienic purpose, killing bugs, not Jews, that the gas chambers had clothing put in, not people. They were hygienic, not homicidal. And the alleged homicidal gas chambers that are written up in the book, huge Holocaust textbooks, these do not have any elevation of cyanide in the walls above normal background levels. And it's a pretty damn simple conclusion.
Speaker 0: Cyclone B was produced by the German company Dagesch. It was also used since 1929 in The United States by the U. S. Public Health Service at the border with Mexico to delouse and disinfect Mexican immigrants that passed from URS to El Paso. DDT was later used as a more effective chemical.
During the end of the war, Allied terror bombings destroyed most of German cities, infrastructure, food and water supplies, railroads and medicine factories. The labor camps could no longer be supplied with adequate food, and the situation in Germany deteriorated fast, and deadly typhus epidemics broke out in Germany's internment camps. Consequently, many of the prisoners could not be fed and were left to starve. By the time the Allied forces swept through Germany, they saw the warning signs outside of the camps: No Entrance Typhus Epidemic. Upon the liberation of the camps, they were met with a ghastly scene of prisoners in the last stages of typhus and piles of deceased and emaciated corpses.
By that time, most prisoners had either died or were dying through starvation or typhus. The Allies were shocked and appalled to find the dire conditions of what their bombing campaigns had helped to create. Even after the Allies liberated the camps, thousands of prisoners died like flies. In fact, the death rate at Bergen Belsen actually increased after the British took over the camp. Footage was then recorded and shown to the international community, and Germany would once again be attacked and blamed.
Speaker 7: You were on the scene in Belzan as a young man. Yes.
Speaker 8: I went with a group of medical students and we arrived in Belson on 05/02/1945 and I first went to the on May 3. Himmler ordered the camp to be ceded on April 11 in order to stop typhus which was an epidemic spreading throughout Europe. The British came in, the tank division came in on April 15 at 03:00 and they did their best to segregate the typhus and the
Speaker 7: dying the others. How many people were in the camp at the time when the British took over the camp?
Speaker 8: I think there were about 57 or 60,000. Today. The British bombed everything and the
Speaker 7: Americans that moved on their
Speaker 8: homes so that getting food there was extremely difficult. The water supplies became contaminated with sewage
Speaker 7: and the administration in the camp more or less broke down. Even let's say if the German camp administration had made maximum effort and had been given everything at hand, could they have prevented this?
Speaker 8: There was no cure for typhus at that time. British put DDT which is an insecticide, everything in every body and in that way I think the typhus was contained but it was a great danger, People didn't realize it was typhus. Suppose fifty six percent of people died who got it.
Speaker 7: Why are these bodies naked? I mean, some of them are so emaciated. Why don't they have their clothing on?
Speaker 8: Well, they did, and then when they were pushed outside of the huts they had clothing on, but clothing was so scarce, everything was scarce, that the inmates would immediately rush up and take all the clothing off because it was a pity to waste it. That's why they were naked.
Speaker 7: Did you see when you got there two weeks after the British Army took over, evidence of gas chambers the way propaganda has said that these Germans had in these camps, or was there any claim made to that effect?
Speaker 8: No. I don't think it was ever thought that there was a gas chamber in Belsonburg. People were dying at five hundred a day by the way, rate five hundred a day.
Speaker 7: Even under the British administration.
Speaker 8: Under the British administration, yes. And what was happening was the English soldiers were giving people their food to people half starved and had very thin stomachs and the stomach would burst and then die. The inmates said that the conditions were, this was what the inmates said, the conditions weren't too bad until the end of '44 and then this mass immigration, but by the time they put in another 50,000, forty fifty thousand of course. Now
Speaker 7: I read in German language books and I'm not sure if it's accurate or not, but that Britain broke a promise to those soldiers to let them go to their own lines and that there was rather brutal treatment on the part of some of the
Speaker 8: British soldiers against those Germans. I didn't know where you read it because I never knew to find it but that's what we understood that most of them have been finished up. That really upset me because I thought that we were fighting a war for ideals and all that and this was the most dishonourable thing to agree to give the safe combat back to alliance and then those that stayed because the lot slipped away and beat them up.
Speaker 7: Were you there during the time when the bulldozers were actually putting these bodies in the graves? In these long trenches that you see
Speaker 8: in the The bulldozers, the bodies were being thrown in. Were put the truck went round every day and picked up the bodies outside the hut and then they were taken to where the bulldozers were dug the grave and they were thrown into the grave.
Speaker 9: But we were all put into what looked like a great big bathroom I guess because they had these shower things at top and we were put onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. Of course the sexes were separated but we all had to sit in a row and what happened eventually is that they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us and the reason for that was that we had to be deloused. We were so full of lice through that, our hair was cut and they rained soap and water on us and I do not remember if there were any towels.
So when I hear about the showerheads and the Holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to de louse us. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian propaganda.
Speaker 8: It wasn't
Speaker 10: like a lie. Steven Spielberg. Everybody in Schindler's List is waiting for the gas to come in
Speaker 7: and lo and behold all it was
Speaker 9: A soap and water came raining down on us in this great big, we call it banya, which is a Russian word for washroom. Bathroom. Bathroom. It was a big communal bathroom. It was huge I would say.
It was the way I remember it of course I was little but the way I remember it I would say it was at least 30 by 30. It must have been built for that purpose to wash us down like dogs. The same for the cutting of hair, I mean we were all shorn bald in order to stop the lice, the louse problem that Everybody we had lice in the war, you know I mean this was just common knowledge that everybody had lice and then of course we had to be deloused and put into Germany.
Speaker 10: So Jews cannot claim unique victim status?
Speaker 9: No, cannot. And when I hear the stories about them losing their hair, big deal, none of us had hair. Yeah. So that that is that was my take
Speaker 7: on it.
Speaker 10: And how about the cattle cars?
Speaker 9: Well, the cattle cars was pretty much the same story because we considered ourselves lucky if we could ride in a cattle car, of course, because then we did not we did not depend on horses. We did not have to walk on foot. Man, that was luxury to ride a cattle car. And yes, they were crammed full of people, and yes, it was very difficult, you know, to to travel like that. You couldn't often you could not sit, you had to stand because they were crammed full.
Often there was not water, there was no food. That was this is how it was in those years. People were hanging on those cattle cars. When you see those pictures, that could have been us. We were like that in those years.
That means nothing. The same when you see the bunk beds. My goodness, we were lucky if we had bunk beds where we could sleep at night. It meant we did not have to sleep outside in the snow. And frankly we never really heard much about the persecution of the Jews.
We knew that there were executions happening in Russia but in Germany I do not remember a single time that I heard any of these stories ever or later on in South America for that matter. I have to struggle to find memories of even the slightest anti Semitism And it was one of my happiest times there because they were so kind to us and so good to us and played with us and gave us toys and know fussed over us. And never ever in all those times was any one of these young soldiers improper with us. Never. It's of the war, that is my happiest time.
Speaker 0: Documents from the German camp shows an order that Heinrich Himmler, chief of the concentration camp, issued orders on 12/28/1942 that the death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs. The camps were mainly factories, and the loss of workers was hurting war production. Inspector of the camps, Ricket Glucks, responded to Himmler's order on 01/20/1943, Every means should be used to lower the death rates in the camp. Already in 1937, several German newspapers reported that murdering Jews would be punishable by death. Joseph Reinhardt had been sentenced to death for killing a Jewish merchant Abraham and his Gentile wife.
Murder was murder, regardless of the victim. In the camps were camp complaint offices, where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. A system of strict discipline for both guards and for inmates with severe punishment being handed out against those found guilty. If any guard would attack a prisoner, the guard would be punished for it, often with death. There was also a prison in the camp, where dangerous or criminal people were placed.
The German SS arrested Bruckenwald commandant Karl Koch in 1943 for mistreating some prisoners. After an investigation, Koch was found guilty by SS judge Condor Morgan and shot. Jewish scholar Arnaud Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University, acknowledged in his 1988 book about the Final Solution that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other natural causes than were executed. There is nothing murderous about cremation ovens. Many dead bodies were cremated because Auschwitz was built on marsh ground, hence decomposing typhus corpses with a poisoning the drinking water and spread fatal diseases.
Ellis Island in USA had similar disinfection and cremation facilities as those in the German camps. In fact, the procedures at the German camps were essentially the same as those used at Ellis Island by The United States. They served the exact same purpose: to keep disease from spreading. Today in The United States, the use of crematoria is even more common than it ever was in Germany then. The mass killings and gassing stories originated with Soviet reports authorized by the known liars in genocidal mass murders around Ilya Ehrenberg and Joe Stalin, which then was spread by the Jewish owned New York Times.
The story was spread just hours after Germany's surrender, which made it impossible for any falsely accused German to refute Soviet's claims. There is in fact no scientific proof that Jews were gassed. There is no evidence of gassing deaths. There are no German documents to identify any gassing victim. No order from Hitler.
No mass graves of gassed Jews. At Nuremberg, the existence of the gas chambers was never even demonstrated. Thousands of secret German documents dealing with the concentration camps were confiscated after the war, but not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In a letter to the US State Department dated 11/22/1944, the Red Cross, who were stationed in all of the camps, stated: We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. The Vatican and Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war about the alleged gas chambers.
The response was always the same: No, the detainees themselves have not spoken of them. All forensic chemical examination have disproven the use of cyclin B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. U. S. Expert on execution technologies Fred Leuchter traveled to Auschwitz and covertly obtained samples from the alleged gas chambers.
He had them tested and published his results. Based on chemical analysis on wall samples and on various technical arguments, Leucher concluded that the locations investigated could not then been or now be utilized or seriously considered function as execution gas chambers.
Speaker 11: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lovesley facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, for and packaged for submission to the laboratories.
I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to in fact confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never in fact contained hydrogen cyanide gas. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas, You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etcetera. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility.
If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers.
Speaker 12: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week And assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 prisoners. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.
Speaker 0: Guillermo Rudolf is a chemist who knew '1, while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Lifter's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Leuchter.
The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, John Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon and many others have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, there are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Krieg, a qualified electronics engineer and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash.
The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass scrapes never even existed in Treblinka or Belsic. There are in fact many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor.
Charles Larsson, one of American's leading forensic pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright, sherry red.
Speaker 8: No
Speaker 0: Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber.
Speaker 13: Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter.
They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Washwoods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, if you go inside it, they they they chop, holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in.
It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building.
Speaker 14: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there there there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in '92, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot, it was an open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman.
And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon b.
The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the the drains in the floor.
You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas chamber. Yeah. A manhole that any adult, even a fairly hefty set adult can go down into.
Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case, rubble or anything else prevented, the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for, at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in 'ninety one, Auschwitz had been open to the West for over a decade, and no one ever noticed the damn manhole. And it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there.
In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a hundred, two hundred, 300 bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which is just kind of a silly thing to think of.
Speaker 0: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine Le Express acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false, and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarvnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated: Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were also forced to alter a shower room at Sachsenhausen to support a Soviet show trial, but the forgery was so crude and embarrassing that the communists had to knock down the building in 1952.
Hundreds of people of all sorts came and went into the German working camps all day long, supplying the camps with food and supplies of all kinds. Yet no one has ever mentioned, and yet no one has ever admitted to seeing any evidence of homicidal gas chambers, required, the thousands of dead bodies every hour or the dust. Aerial photos show the same lack of evidence. Detailed Allied aerial investigation photographs taken of the German camps every day during the 1944 when made public in 1979. Not even CIA experts could find the slightest trace of piles of human corpses, smoking crematorium chimneys, or masses of Jews awaiting deaths or gassing.
The horrifying pictures of heaps of corpses we have been shown as proof of a systematic extermination of Jews by the evil Nazis are in fact misleading. All footage of dead camp inmates are of those who died of typhus and malnutrition in Western camps during the final weeks of the war, and this is confirmed by German military, Red Cross, and British military medical records. Even mainstream historians now agree that mass murders or homicidal gassings never took place in any of the camps from where the Allied footage are taken. Unfortunately, this is never pointed out whenever the footage is shown. So they try to sell you a story, but now you know the truth.
In fact, the Allied saturation bombings are directly responsible for many of these tragic deaths. It is also important to note that most of these dead bodies are not even Jewish. A large number of the bodies were in reality the direct result of Allied bombing and strafing attacks. Images of Nordhausen are used all over the major media, but it has been proven that these prisoners were blown up and strafed by British warplanes, and they were not exterminated by the Germans as the official story goes.
Speaker 15: And there I had over 4,000 prisoners laying on tuberculosis. Sick. What are doing with tuberculosis? No no medications, nothing, hardly food. It was very meager already.
The Germans didn't have to eat. And all of a sudden, it was April 3 at 03:00, alarm and American air force over us on drop the bombs just on our camp. But the whole camp was entirely destroyed. And out of this, 4,000 people, we were 200 survived. Because they died there, they were in the camps, you know, hanging in the ceiling, dead bodies, and it was awful.
It was burning days and days. We were still if this is the nurses, the doctors, administration people who work in this nation, we run away. And the Americans made a mistake because they didn't know this is a concentration camp. They knew it is a military camp. They emptied the military a month before or in January, we put us in.
You see? So they didn't know. So they came back at 09:00 in the morning and hit the whole city. The whole city, they flattened. We ran away in the wood in the in the fields.
And when they emptied the the planes, they came and strived us with machine guns. Know? They could know who it is. These are Germans. You know?
And we went into the woods, but we remained about a week in the woods. And we ate only the raw potatoes.
Speaker 0: What about all these pictures? Well, you have seen dead primarily political prisoners, either killed by starvation, disease, indirectly or due to allied bondings. When the Soviets took over the camps, they were reopened and filled with Germans and other anti communists. After the communists had tortured and starved them to death, photos of these prisoners were also passed off as victims of Hitler's holocaust. Pictures from these massacres committed by the Soviets and even dead Germans from the allied bombings of Dresden were also spliced into the propaganda and used as proof of Jewish dead.
Even though we now know the truth about the footage, the pictures have now become emblematic of the holocaust, and our media still use them to mislead the public. The leading think tank for Holocaust revisionism is the Institute for Historical Review, an independent and non profit organization committed in the education of World War II. In 1979, IHR publicly offered a reward of $50,000 for verifiable proof that the homicidal gas chambers existed. It was challenged by Mel Marmelstein, a Hungarian born Jew. He declared that he saw his mother and two sisters lured into gas chambers.
He used his own autobiographical memoir By Bread Alone as proof. In the book, he describes how his father told him that his mother and sister had been burned alive. He would later say in his book that his uncle heard that his mother and sister had been led to the gas chambers. He would change his story once again in a letter published in a California newspaper saying that he had witnessed his own mother and his two sisters being led through a tunnel to Gas Chamber 5, even though there was no Gas Chamber 5 or a tunnel that led to it. Judge Thomas Johnson of the Superior Court of California ruled against IHR and rewarded the Maramel sign 70,000 stating that the gassings of the Jews is not a reasonable subject to dispute as it's simply a fact.
It was reported already during World War one that the Germans and their allies were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. Jewish controlled media even had used the magical numbers 6,000,000 and the magical words extermination and holocaust. An article printed in Britain's The Daily Telegraph on 03/22/1916 stated that the Austrians and Bulgarians were killing people by shutting them up in churches and suffocating them with poison gas. Some of the other propaganda lies said that the Germans were cutting off children's hands, crucifying Canadian soldiers, making human soap in a corpse factory, gauging out the eyes of civilians, cutting off the hands of the teenage boys, raping and sexually mutilating women, giving children hand grenades to play with, and bayoneting babies. After the end of the war, Stanley Baldwin admitted in parliament that it all had been propaganda and that no such gas chambers had existed.
He also apologized publicly to the German people for this racist slur on them. On 12/02/1925, British foreign secretary Austin Chamberlain admitted that none of the atrocity propaganda was true and hoped that it would never happen again. After World War II, this false anti German propaganda was spread once again. During and after World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Germany to distract people from the atrocities being committed primarily by the Red Army. In a 02/29/1944 letter to the BBC and higher members of the British clergy from the British Ministry of Information read, We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from for example the writing and speeches of the prime minister himself during the last twenty years.
We know how the red army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bezerabia only recently. We must therefore take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. We cannot reform the Bolsheviks, but we can do our best to save them and ourselves from the consequences of their acts. The disclosure of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing.
The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately, the public is no longer as susceptible as in the days of the corpse factory and mutilated Belgian babies and the crucified Canadians. Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attentions from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put in circulation by the ministry. In other words, the letter can be summed up like this.
We all know the crimes like the Holodomor and the Red Tarot committed by the Bolsheviks over the last twenty four years. It is inevitable that they would do the same in Central Europe. We will cover up their crimes by lying about the Germans. The public is not as stupid as it was. Our lies will be better.
You must spread these lies convincingly. This reminds us that truth really is the first victim of war. This was essentially the start would turn into what we know today as the Holocaust, as the control media starting spitting out even more horrific propaganda against Germany. Basically, everything that the propaganda blamed Hitler and the Germans for were the Bolsheviks themselves guilty of.
Speaker 16: Propaganda allowed these crimes to happen, and then propaganda took over when the crimes were committed and basically projected the crimes back upon the vanquished. The victors just turned it around and blamed everything on those they had slaughtered and raped.
Speaker 6: After the war, where did all these stories come from, which we hear now no end of? It came part it became because the Jews realized they were gonna get Israel out of it as a motivation for telling stories. And then as well as that, as in fact, well enough, Germany starts giving funds for every so called holocaust survivor. Holocaust survivor just has to have a story about them being in Europe and surviving the holocaust, and then they get money from Germany. So you got a reward for every every story.
Speaker 0: The Jewish British journalist, Sefton Delmer, was the head of black propaganda. Black propaganda is false information and material that purports to be from a source of on one side of a conflict, but it's actually from the opposite side. It is typically used to vilify, embarrass, or misrepresent the enemy. OSS, forerunner of CIA, also faked documents and diaries. Revisionists are convinced that the black propaganda is a fundamental factor behind the holocaust propaganda.
Atrocity propaganda is how we run the war, and we're only really beginning with it now. We will continue this atrocity propaganda. We will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they're doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly, but with eagerness to please the victors. Only then will our victory be complete.
It will never be final. Re education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again. Those indestructible weeds of historical truth. In September 1940, Sefton was recruited by the Political Warfare Executive to organize black propaganda and allied psychological warfare.
Sefton's special method was lying as exactly as possible, so that the lies couldn't be uncovered right away. Until 1947, Delmer coordinated the black propaganda campaign with the French, the Soviets, and the Americans. During this period, he and his staff forged German documents about alleged German war crimes, which reached official files. Delmer provided the documents to the British Ministry of Information, which in turn sent them to the Nuremberg trials as official documents. Without checking whether the documents were true or false, they were presented as evidence of generally known facts.
The propaganda after the war blamed Germany for starting the war, censored all Allied atrocities, and depicted the Soviet Union as a Utopia. General Eisenhower also rounded up German villagers and forced them to see what they had done. Audiences were horrified by newsreel footage of the Nazi concentration camps. One full length film directed by Eisenhower showed the shrunken heads of inmates and lampshades that supposedly were made from human flesh. German civilians were rounded up and forced to view it all to install shame and horror in them.
Within the week of the capture of Buchenwald, the Jewish Hollywood director Billy Wilder was in the camp making a film of propaganda lies that still circulate to this day. The film was called Deathmills, Die Torensmulle in German, and was made for the psychological warfare department of the US Department of War. Its purpose was to indoctrinate the Germans to believe that the National Socialists were evil in order to shame the Germans away from nationalism and racial consciousness. The film claimed that the Nazis made soap from the fat of Jewish prisoners, made lampshades from the skin of prisoners and shrunk the heads of prisoners like in the Amazon. Modern science has determined these horrific claims from Buchenwald and Bergen Belsen to be absurd Allied propaganda.
It all has been debunked as fabrication. Even Jewish scholars as Lipstadt now admit that these were all propaganda lies. DNA tests proved that the shrunken heads were fakes. The soap was ordinary soap. The lampshades were made of goat leather, and there were never any homicidal gassings at the camps.
Tales of gas chambers disguised as shower rooms are wartime atrocity fiction, similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades. The shrunken heads hoax was the creation of Albert D. Rosenberg, a Jewish officer serving in Eisenhower's psychological warfare unit. Even though these things have been debunked as hoaxes, they are repeated by the lying, hate filled scientists.
Speaker 17: They would kill the infants and make lampshades out of baby skins or soap or baby fat.
Speaker 18: I I showed a pit in Auschwitz where they made soap from people. They throw in people and took the fat and make soap for the
Speaker 11: German military, boiling water,
Speaker 19: big pool. We have soap made out of human beings.
Speaker 11: R I f meant rhein judesh fat. Pure Jewish fat.
Speaker 20: RJF. And RJF meant Rein Yudicious fat translated clean Jewish fat. Pure Jewish soap. You know, fat.
Speaker 15: Pure Jewish fat.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Piece
Speaker 21: of soap He said, made out of Jewish fat.
Speaker 0: In 1944, another book was written which advocated the denazification and mass psychological brainwashing of the German people. It was called What to Do with Germany and was written by prominent Benei Breth member Louis Nietzsche. Nietzsche was a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York and was also a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann and Henry Morgenthau, Franklin D. Russell's Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan. Nietzsche wanted to turn the Germans into brainwashed, conservative zombies.
National Socialist teachers will be replaced. Media would demonize and dehumanize the German people. National socialism would be depicted as the most evil ideology. German books would be destroyed in huge book burnings to destroy German culture and the collective German memory. As part of the propaganda campaign to demonize Germans, the Soviets and others also forged many photographs which are used to represent Holocaust atrocities.
Pictures of dead Germans now became pictures of dead Jews. Pictures of National Socialists became pictures of evil racist Nazis. Photos of German refugees became photos of Jews. The anti German propaganda that started after the war by the Jewish owned media was going to continue for over seventy years in the future. During an appearance on the Larry King television show, actor Marlon Brando dared to comment that
Speaker 22: I think that I I'm angry with some of the Jews. I'm very goddamn angry at some of the Jews. Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews. And they should have a a a greater sensitivity about the issue of of people who are suffering.
Speaker 0: Ariel Sharon admitted in 2001 that we the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it. The Jewish supremacist journalist Elad Nirai said, Let's be honest with ourselves here, fellow Jews. We do control media. Got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies, it's almost obscene. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?
Joel Stein, columnist for the Los Angeles Times, in his column in the LA Times in 2008, Stein says that Americans who think the Jews do not control Hollywood and the media are just plain dumb. He says I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. I don't care if Americans think we are running the news, media or Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.
Jews totally run Hollywood, Stane proudly admits. He then goes on to provide a long, long list of Hollywood media owners who all are Jews to prove his point. Today, six Jewish companies control 96% of the world's media. The so called denazification has never stopped. For seven decades, we have only heard one side of the story.
There have been thousands of books, films and TV series dedicated to the Holocaust to frighten people from the National Socialist ideology. One of the most known movies that has influenced how people see Germany's role in World War two has undoubtedly been the Schindler's List, sold out to the public as a true story and filmed in black and white for a claim to authenticity. Despite this fictional film containing nudity and murder, it is continually shown in European and American schools as mandatory viewing for history education. It portrays the Germans as evil monsters who only cared for one thing killing innocent Jews. However, the film was based upon a fiction book called Schindler's List, which won the LA Times Book Award for Fiction, authored by Thomas Cannelley.
The author himself has no experience of the camps. So, here we have a film being shown to our children as truth when it's actually based upon a work of fiction. In other words, it is not truth. Names, characters, places, and incidents are either products of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Impressionable children in middle school are also instructed to read The Diary of Anna Frank, which now probably is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory.
The 15 year old girl Anna Frank and her father Otto Frank were deported from The Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Otto was treated in the hospital at Auschwitz. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many others to the overcrowded Bergen Belsen camp. Tens of thousands of Jewish survivors chose to leave Auschwitz and go west by January 1945, with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them every day for years. Anne Frank died of typhus in March 1945.
However, the original diary manuscript was forensically examined by the German state forensic bureau, the Bundescriminal Amt. Their analysis determined significant portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available to everyone before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war. Handwriting experts determined after closer examination of the originals that all of the writing in the diary was by the same hand and the BKA determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's real handwriting. The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Mayor Levine, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payments for his work in a court action against Anne's father, Oto Frank.
The truth about the Anne Frank diary was first exposed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Friyaoud. It established that the Jewish novelist Mayor Levine had written the dialogue of the diary and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. An extract from the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council letter 04/15/1959, as follows: History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. The Western world has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what's purposed to be her personally written story, Anna Frank's diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.
A noteworthy decision of the New York State Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Major Levine, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the Anne Frank diary. Evidence compiled by Doctor. Robert Farison of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax. After doing substantial research, Professor Farisen stated, The truth obliged me to say that the diary of Anne Frank is only a simple literary fraud. The Jewish German communist Bruno Baum admitted to being one of the main fabricators of propaganda at the Auschwitz camp.
He said, it is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda was written by ourselves in the camp. We carried out this propaganda in for the world public until our very last day of presence in Auschwitz. The evil Germans actually went to great lengths to keep the inmates well fed, well housed, and entertained in the German camps. The camps had decent sufficient food until the last weeks of the war when the allies had bombed all infrastructure of Germany into oblivion.
Speaker 19: We also had a an orchestra where some of the musicians stand stood together, together and and one one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes, so later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was of course helping us, you know, we also did plays and stuff.
Speaker 9: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz?
Speaker 21: Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that New Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also a business stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage?
I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage and that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my roommate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra.
I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper.
So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz.
But then she saw me work there. I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And Otto wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz.
And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves and from these leaves they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz.
Speaker 23: How did you entertain yourself,
Speaker 24: Well, there were at that at the beginning of those days, there was a library where people could get books to read. There were newspapers which we could get, and that and also among ourselves sometimes we had what do call, a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoner the prisoner said said, oh, you must be crazy. They're gonna make a movie for us in the camp.
And then what happened? They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening.
They brought movies in in the evening.
Speaker 23: What kind of movies would they show?
Speaker 24: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to write home. Once a postcard and once a letter.
Speaker 23: They gave you the materials?
Speaker 24: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, so they we could
Speaker 23: How did
Speaker 20: you get the stamps?
Speaker 24: The stamps. We could buy stamps. We could
Speaker 9: You had money?
Speaker 24: Yeah. We got my still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us everybody some money.
Speaker 23: And and in the camp you could have currency?
Speaker 24: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina, and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah.
But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes.
Speaker 23: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay?
Speaker 24: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then.
Speaker 23: Paid for your work?
Speaker 24: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then.
Speaker 19: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was a little later where we played soccer. It's amazing
Speaker 0: that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be enough energy left to do something like
Speaker 19: energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off the problems we had.
Speaker 25: Especially the Germans start losing the war, 1943, 1944. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we had organised very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized soccer teams and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer on the assembly line, on the assembly place.
Speaker 20: In Gross Rosen.
Speaker 25: In Gross Rosen. So you know that much free air was in there but it was like the 1440s. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side so there they had to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves.
Speaker 26: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things?
Speaker 25: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from outside civilians. But that was strictly on the cover. SS didn't know that. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost over so they didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted SS men decided he wants to play for the Polish team.
So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy.
Speaker 26: How did you feel about that?
Speaker 25: And the funny part of it, we said, just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close.
Speaker 26: So is what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than Definitely. Becoming more cool or
Speaker 25: In our camp, pressure you you did feel the pressure.
Speaker 0: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death, while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children.
Speaker 20: Freddy Hirsch called me to the children's barracks, he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him and he asked me what I need.
So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints or any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes, anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me. And I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab.
It was kind of olive colored, like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff. And I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows.
And then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White.
And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses.
I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that.
Speaker 27: When you were in the process of doing that Yeah. What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children on on an emotional level.
Speaker 20: Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips, and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie.
Speaker 27: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz?
Speaker 20: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared, and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me.
Speaker 0: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick base and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities' former master garrison physician Doctor. Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy.
The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which is sold by people who by their own accounts were treated in hospitals in the so called extermination camps. The inmates also built an elegant Olympic sized swimming pool, complete with several diving boards, where they would sunbathe while watching the water polo matches on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. According to official figures, there were five and twenty three thousand Jews in Germany in January 1933. The Courhaire report reveals that as of December 1942, there were only 9,127 Jews in all the concentration camps. Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything and estimated the total debt from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000.
About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200,000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the sixteen fifty page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were four categories in turn during the war. Poles, Jews, Russians and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans.
Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald.
Speaker 6: You've got prisoner of the death books of Auschwitz, which is the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about life and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the nineteen nineties. And those give you a total, What is it? 29,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the world war two. Okay?
And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've more Catholics and Jews dying in Auschwitz. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died and so on. Well, you can put it up at very most, I would say, four forty thousand Jews die dying at Auschwitz. Now, I don't allow it to go any higher than that.
And that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war. Soviets put that totally absurd figure.
Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included seven homicidal gas chambers. Five of these seven have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2005 from 2,000,000 to seventy eight thousand. But somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged.
So, what is six million, minus four million, minus 2,000,000? The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6,000,000. The British secret service had cracked the German top secret enigma code and had access to most German military communications by 1942, and there were no references in the decrypts to gassings.
Speaker 6: Well, it's the most most reliable authoritative source you could possibly have because Britain was overhearing the German radio messages when the Germans didn't know they were being intercepted. And by the the Enigma code Enigma code breakers got these messages, and and after fifty years, they've finally been released in the National Archives. In the mid nineties, they were put out. Historians takes no no interest in these decreeps for the obvious reason that they show no sign of any holocaust going on. Okay?
That they show different ethnic groups being moved around, different labor camps. For example, Jews coming to Auschwitz and Jews leaving Auschwitz. The four main categories, Poles, Russians, Jews, German political prisoners, that they group the inmates as and there's they show the great endeavor to get useful industrial work out of the inmates. They they discuss the different kinds of work they're trying to do and what resources they need or ordering stuff that can be done. And then they describe the shattering impact of typhus epidemic breaking out, especially at Auschwitz in the '42 and the struggle to be able to cope with it and get it under control and the sense of horror as the whole of Auschwitz Camp was quarantined as as the epidemics took their toll.
The decrypt show that the only thing people were basically, they were killed if they tried to escape. There guards shooting anyone trying to escape, but otherwise, you know, there are rules for treating inmates properly, and the SS guards had to treat them properly and could be court martialed if they didn't. Inmate could put in a complaint if they weren't treated properly.
Speaker 0: Letters recently found in the archives proved that US and German top level government officials talked with each other through Swiss and Irish consuls in 1944 to 1945 about the conditions of inmates in German operated camps. Germany guaranteed to evacuate inmates to save them from the Soviets, and former camp inmates confirmed inmates were being safely evacuated. The Allies confirmed the Germans were helping inmates, not murdering them. Several sources including the World Almanac Red Cross documentation, the New York Times and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers and according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
The Nuremberg trials were held in the German city of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. The National Socialist leaders were arrested and placed on trial for alleged war crimes. In the courtroom was four judges, one each from The US, Britain, France, and The Soviet Union. The Nuremberg prosecutors, Kepner, Rapp, Niederman, all were Jews. In a letter to his wife, Nuremberg's chief prosecutor Thomas J.
Dodd wrote that the prosecution team was 75% Jewish. The general prosecutor for the High Court was Doctor. Jacob Meissner, a Jew. According to Louis Marchalko, a wartime Hungarian journalist who wrote about the trials, out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews. The Holocaust narrative is used to take away focus from the war crimes committed by Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill, the Red Army, Eisenhower, and Allied forces, and instead scapegoats the National Socialists for most of the war's horrors.
At the Nuremberg trials, the existence of gas chambers was not established by physical and technical evidence that is normally required in any criminal trial. Article nineteen and twenty one of the statute of the court dispensed the charge of this constraint. The alleged gas chambers were neither studied nor described. American revisionist Samuel Crowell, in his brilliant 2011 book The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes, writes how the Allies presented just four German documents at the Nuremberg trials to prove that the Nazis gassed people and all of these documents were mistranslated or completely taken out of context. The National Socialists at the war crimes trials were tortured by the mostly Jewish communist and British interrogators, usually by having their testicles crushed until they would admit the holocaust.
Jewish led prosecutor in the Einsatzgruppen trials publicly admitted to having witnessed torture and personally used death threats to extract confessions. Simpson Army Commission judge said, the investigators would put a black hood over the accused head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. All but two of the Germans in the 139 cases we investigated had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. Rudolf Huss was one of them. He was arrested and tortured and bullied into unrealistic and absurd confessions.
The wrong answer would give him terrible punishments. The gassing methods that he confessed to was totally implacable. Confessions were based on torture where Huss had been broken down to the point that he could say anything to avoid having more of the treatment. Huss was later hanged so that nobody would find out the truth. Huss lied to save the lives of his wife and children.
All of this have been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollection of British Jewish Sergeant Bernard Clarke who brags about how he tortured Huss and threatened his family to force a confession out of him. Clark even threatened to send Hus children to the Gulags in Siberia if he did not confess. The Jewish domination and control of the trials was obvious. Even the hangman for the 10 National Socialist leaders sentenced to death, Master Surgeon John C. Woods was a Jew.
And the hangings took place on 10/16/1946, the Jewish holiday of Purim. In the book of Esther, the 10 sons of Haman, an enemy of the Jews, were hanged on Purim day. The executioners used a short drop instead of a neck breaking long drop. The victims thus died a longer death due to strangulation. The trapdoor was too small such that the several of the men suffered bleeding head injuries when they hit the sides of the trapdoor while falling.
The bodies were cremated and scattered over a river denying the families the right of burial as a final insult. The Soviet propagandists Ilya Ehrenberg, yes, you know the Jew who encouraged the genocide and mass rape of the German women, he knew about a 6,000,000 already in November 1944, as English newspapers were announcing that Ehrenberg was going to publish a book on claimed German atrocities. He described how 6,000,000 Jews had been massacred by the Germans. Considering how it takes months to write a book, the 6,000,000 figure must have been around well before November 1944. As the Allies were about to invade Germany, Ilya Ehrenberg wrote the following in the newspaper Soviet War News published by the Soviet Embassy in London.
In regions they seized, the Germans they killed all the Jews, from the old folks to infants in arms. Ask any German prisoner why his fellow countrymen annihilated 6,000,000 innocent people and he will reply quite simply, why? Because they were Jews. The claim was repeated in the same newspaper in 01/04/1945 and again on 03/15/1945. But how could Ehrenberg know that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed before even a single Allied soldier had set foot on German soil.
On 04/30/1945, when Hitler died and Germany surrendered, The New York Times reported that more than 6,000,000 inmates had been liberated, not killed, in German concentration camps. In June 1945, before the Nuremberg trials began, the man who was organizing it, US chief prosecutor Robert Jackson, met three lawyers representing major influential Jewish organizations to get their input for the upcoming trial. Regarding Jewish population losses, Jackson asked them straightforward. How great were those Jewish losses? One of the Jewish lawyers responded spontaneously.
6,000,000. But how could he have known this? The truth is that the 6,000,000 figure is a symbolic religious mantra that has been repeated over 200 times in Jewish owned media throughout the last century and long before Hitler even was born and long before National Socialism even existed.
Speaker 6: After the war, Soviets put that totally absurd figure. That 6,000,000 figure was basically a mantra that had been throbbing through the twentieth century right from the end of the nineteenth century when when it began. The 6,000,000 figure began as a new as a as a fundraising appeal. American Jews were fundraising on the grounds that 6,000,000 European Jews were in trouble. Right?
And it started off Jews in Russia. 6,000,000 Jews in Russia are in trouble, so on and so on and so on. And then in the nineteen thirties, it became 6,000,000 Jews in Europe under threat because of Hitler and and and so on. And then finally at Nuremberg, it became in the past tense, 6,000,000 Jews have been killed. And you've got something like 200 newspaper headlines of that.
It's extraordinary the way that way that Mantric number, which never in any sense at any point counted. Okay? It's important to appreciate that nobody counted 6,000,000 or in any way looked as if they had counted 6,000,000 at Nuremberg at a Nuremberg trial after the war. Alright? It was just that figure that had been pulsing as a mantra through newspaper headlines, 6,000,000 Jews in Europe.
Speaker 0: In this book, the first Holocaust, the surprising origin of the 6,000,000 Figure, Don Hettysheimer illustrates that the 6,000,000 figure actually dates back to Jewish fundraising campaigns that started in the end of nineteenth century and reached its peak in the mid-1920s. During almost a hundred years, Jews spread the rumor that 6,000,000 of Jews in Europe were suffering and sometimes going so far as that 6,000,000 Jews had died already. The Jewish owned New York Times was the main vehicle for the propaganda, which even include well known buzzwords like extermination and holocaust. After the Sinus Balfour Declaration was signed, the Jews claimed that 6,000,000 Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was fourteen years before the National Socialists came to power, and twenty four years before the alleged Holocaust started.
The origin of this figure of 6,000,000 is not based on any kind of factual knowledge regarding Jewish population losses, it is purely a fictional, symbolic, esoteric and mystical number. Written in the Jewish Torah was a prophecy that the Jews would be allowed to return to Israel minus 6,000,000 of their people. You shall return minus 6,000,000. The book Dogma of Judaism describes how the 6,000,000 number is kabbalistically derived. The number 6,000,000 is a symbolic number with a religious meaning and the Holocaust is part of the religious dogma of Judaism.
Benjamin Blech confirmed this reality in his own book, The Secrets of Hebrew Words. The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials, and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death, steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. One
Speaker 8: thing
Speaker 28: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us for every man that ran to the wire. They they took a 100 inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody.
Speaker 21: This is greatest love story we've ever told on
Speaker 29: this show. Oh, okay. This is
Speaker 30: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot.
Speaker 21: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have
Speaker 9: in my jacket and a
Speaker 21: piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 30: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long?
Speaker 10: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it, that she was there, and she threw the apple to me.
Speaker 30: How can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true.
Speaker 10: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true.
Speaker 30: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years
Speaker 10: of lying. I pronounce my love for you forever.
Speaker 30: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Yeah. And and and while you were up
Speaker 0: on the stage there with all
Speaker 7: these people, in the back
Speaker 30: of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would?
Yes. I
Speaker 21: simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true.
Speaker 8: He said he made up
Speaker 30: a he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world.
Speaker 21: And his son says, tried to stop him.
Speaker 30: Yes.
Speaker 21: Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan.
Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor Josef Mengele. Had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie.
Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFonsheka wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust.
Her story was published almost twenty years ago as A Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, living on stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie.
The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that, it is not the true reality, but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and, my inner world. Michelle will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712. But a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor.
Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number 87713 actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number A7712 actually was given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers.
Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred.
In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting, Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklos also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary.
Neither Eli Huizel nor his father Shlomo Huizel are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book, Night, brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda.
But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinia was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration camps. Rassinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated.
French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rasinior said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by disease and particularly typhus and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany.
I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the II World War.
That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelstein says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish sheep rabbi Aria Friedman says the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction.
Jewish professor Roger de Margo said
Speaker 31: I know that the plot, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know, because it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Now any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English: hydrogenic acid. Hydrocyanic Hydrocyanic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known and even the most important American Jewish newspapers, the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942.
So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they alright. So I think anybody can see that. I enlisted in 1944.
Speaker 30: I see.
Speaker 31: I enlisted for three years, 1944. It was in the war. The war finished in 1945, but I was in the army in 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and said when you read these books. Well, maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg.
And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when Hetler I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been dead now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my in my lecture, is absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Mein Kampf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg.
I studied what happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany is and the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about it. When you really know what he did, what he actually did in Germany, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled, to use a mild term.
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department and the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made a following statement. I was in Dachau for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany.
Speaker 32: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with.
Speaker 33: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farasson, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Farson has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year 2000, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile.
There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Muller. In 2009, Muller was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes, one of them being Muller's assertion that the official version of the holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history.
Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past.
Speaker 22: Absolutely. We need to
Speaker 21: play on that guilt.
Speaker 28: I bring up everything from
Speaker 5: the past.
Speaker 29: Fifty years. If
Speaker 8: the
Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore.
Speaker 7: It's basically the same as quoting Hitler.
Speaker 34: There's a bunch of opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term.
Speaker 7: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions.
Speaker 35: Very racist and antisemitic things. This This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. It sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person.
Don't blame the Jews. This is literally my grandpa.
Speaker 7: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay?
When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past.
Speaker 36: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera.
Speaker 0: 6,000,000.
Speaker 31: 6,000,000.
Speaker 36: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker brother 6,000,000. Were 6,000,000. Was 6,000,000.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon against all white Europeans.
Speaker 29: I have done my research. Shane.
Speaker 8: I have
Speaker 29: done my research. Shane. Shane. You're fucking a white male. Yes.
In America. Shane. Yes. Look at all the fucking Shane. People that are Mexicans.
Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that?
Speaker 37: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole.
Speaker 29: The
Speaker 0: Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the West world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State Of Israel had practically been outlawed.
The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the Orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many Holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish Holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and Zionist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies.
Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population.
Speaker 36: Moet Zetyesha, in conjunction with My Israel, has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature.
Speaker 38: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, and it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that?
And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, it's just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs.
Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four to two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for Holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine.
Speaker 15: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is.
Speaker 17: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That they said the truth.
Speaker 21: And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into They the sources for are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do.
Speaker 17: Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom.
Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on article 19 in the United Nations declaration of human rights.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exists should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie.
The truth stands on its own legs.
Speaker 20: At that time, my whole family's wiped out.
Speaker 39: Yes, Yes, The Holocaust is big business because, Germany so far has given the Jews, I think, at least $200,000,000,000. So it's big business, and some of you are still getting a thousand dollars a month. And a lot of people don't know this. And then people don't realize who brought the slaves to America. They were Jewish ships.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Fake German holocaust was always wartime propaganda
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“Let’s debunk Majdanek on one photograph. There’s the windows….” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/ITP6jZ2DRE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses Mydonic and presents a debunking claim in one photograph, specifically referencing "the windows" and the claim that Zyklon Bee was thrown in through the windows from outside to gas people. The speaker asserts this is a false narrative and characterizes it as a supposed wartime propaganda story that has grown into history over time.
The speaker says: "the story with Mydonic is that they act... opened the windows and they threw the Zyklon Bee in the windows from outside" to gas people, and comments that the idea is absurd and that no one would knock the window out while being gassed. The speaker notes that this is the supposed explanation and that, in context, it becomes obvious it was wartime propaganda that has over time grown into history.
The speaker then shifts to the broader implications, noting that people all over Europe can go to jail just for having this conversation today, potentially facing years in prison. They anticipate backlash against doing the show. The speaker asserts that history needs to be rewritten, stating that the people who perpetuate this story are "enemies of humanity." They argue that when you lie about history, you "steal people's essence from them," and claim that "there should be there's no punishment too great for that."
In sum, the speaker contends that the Mydonic anecdote about Zyklon B being thrown through windows is a wartime propaganda narrative, not credible history, and emphasizes the consequences and penalties of challenging or discussing such histories in Europe. They express a conviction that history should be rewritten to correct what they view as deceptive or harmful representations, while acknowledging potential social or legal repercussions for discussing these topics publicly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: German engineering. Okay. So then Mydonic Mydonic, you get through real quick. Here's let's debunk Mydonic in one photograph. There's the windows.
Okay? And so the story with Mydonic is that they act I'm I'm not even making this up. That they opened the windows and they threw the Zyklon Bee in the windows from outside. That's how they allegedly gasping people. Oh my god.
It's just it's so you're supposed to just sit and believe this and not question it. Right. Someone's not just gonna knock the window out as we're getting gas. It's just so absurd. That was Yeah.
That was the story. Yes. And so to when you put all that in context, it becomes obvious. It was wartime propaganda that has over time grown into history. Mhmm.
And like you said, people all over Europe can go to jail just for having this conversation today. Like, years in prison. Right. I'm sure there'll be some kind of blowback on doing the show in general. Yeah.
Oh, well. This is part of history that needs to be rewritten. It does. The people who perpetuate this story are enemies of humanity. Ultimately, when you lie about history, you take you steal people's essence from them and there should be there's no punishment too great for that.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The alleged gases the jews suffered from the”holocaust” 🤣
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“For many decades it was alleged that Jews were killed using carbon monoxide and a diesel engine in Treblinka, but people realized that diesel engines don’t produce enough carbon monoxide to kill you.” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/7Itacp1H0B
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker challenges the historical narrative around Nazi extermination methods by asserting several counterclaims about the evidence and the revisions of the story over time. They claim that the carbon monoxide used at Treblinka allegedly came from a diesel engine, but argue that diesel engines do not produce enough carbon monoxide to kill people, implying that the story had to be changed. They note that Yad Vashem discussed this in 2019, but contend that the debunking of the diesel-engine theory occurred in the 1980s, and that the Nitzkor project responded by stating it was “just a 500 BHP engine from a captured Soviet tank,” accusing others of moving the goalposts whenever caught.
The speaker then shifts to Zyklon B, asserting that it “was not meant to kill people, it was meant to kill bugs and keep the prisoners healthy and alive because they needed them,” portraying the chemical as primarily a pest-control agent rather than a genocide tool.
Turning to Auschwitz, the speaker references a sympathetic photograph, then discusses propaganda about the number of victims. They state, “originally, the propaganda about Auschwitz was that five point five million were killed at Auschwitz,” and clarify that when they refer to Auschwitz, they are not talking about Birkenau but the initial Auschwitz gas chamber.
Overall, the speaker presents a pattern of alleged revision and reinterpretation of Nazi-era facts, arguing that the narrative shifts whenever it is challenged, and contrasting widely cited figures and purposes with claimed alternative explanations. The emphasis throughout is on questioning the established account of how mass murder was carried out at Treblinka and Auschwitz and on attributing changes in the historical narrative to deliberate adjustments rather than new evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know. So the carbon monoxide that they used at Treblinka allegedly at Treblinka for many many decades, it was alleged they used a diesel engine. Right? But people realize that diesel engines don't produce enough carbon monoxide in order to kill you. They'll make it because they had to change the story.
They had to change the story and that's exactly what they did. But see, this Yad Vashem was talking about this in 2019, but the debunking of the diesel engines happened like in the eighties. And so here we have the Nitzkor project who gave the response to the debunking of the diesel engines and said to know that it was just a 500 BHP engine from a captured Soviet tank. Right? It's moving the goalpost forever.
Yeah. Every time they get caught, they just change and add something different. Right. The Zyklon b, you know, I've already talked about the Zyklon b, it was not meant to kill people, it was meant to kill bugs and keep the prisoners healthy and alive because they needed them. Right?
Alright. So Auschwitz, this is what a what a sympathetic photograph this looks like. Mhmm. Alright. So originally, the propaganda about Auschwitz was that five point five million were killed at Auschwitz.
And when they say Auschwitz here, they're not talking about Birkenau. They're talking about the initial Auschwitz gas chamber
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Cracking the enigma code reveals the fabrication of the German holocaust Fact: it also allowed for the political jews in America influence the president to let Japan attack pearl harbor
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
David Irving talks about the British codebreakers reading the German secret messages of the Commander of Auschwitz: “…he says there is no reference to any gassings the majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness…” https://t.co/jRIRESs0az
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must revise our histories of the Second World War to incorporate the enormous element played by British code breaking, which also has a vital part in the Auschwitz story. One of the codes we were breaking were the secret codes of the commandant of Auschwitz. The top secret messages the commandant of Auschwitz sent back to Berlin every night, reporting what he had been doing in the previous twenty-four hours, were being read by us. Sometimes we read them before Oswald Pohl, his superior in Berlin, read them. This gave us exact knowledge of what was happening in Auschwitz.
The British official historian, Professor Frank Hinsley, who is the master of St John’s College in Cambridge, writes in volume two of the history of the British Secret Service and in a special appendix devoted to these decoded police signals, SS signals, that there is no reference to any gassings. The majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness. This claim is there in his writing, and it is suggested that historians should look for it.
Yet is anybody smearing Hinsley's name? Is anybody banning him from Germany or Austria or Italy or South Africa? No, because he’s not out there campaigning. He’s not campaigning for real history. He’s written it, and the speaker respects his judgment. Hinsley decided to preserve your reputation, go to Cambridge, become master of St John’s College, write the book, and let the real fighters go out there and do the fighting. And that is what the speaker is doing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, of course, we've all had to revise our versions of the history of the second world war to include the enormous element played by British code breaking. And British code breaking incidentally plays a vital part in the Auschwitz story because one of the codes we were breaking were the secret codes of the commandant of Auschwitz. The top secret messages with the commandant of Auschwitz sent back to Berlin every night reporting what he'd been doing in the previous twenty four hours. We were reading it. Sometimes we've read it before Oswald Pohl, his superior in Berlin read it.
So we knew exactly what was happening in Auschwitz. And the British official historian, professor Frank Hinsley, who's present the master of St John's College in Cambridge, he writes in volume two of the history of the British Secret Service and a special appendix devoted to these decoded police signals, SS signals, he says there is no reference to any gassings. The majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness. It's there. If only the historians look for it.
Yet is anybody smearing Hinsley's name? Is anybody banning him from Germany or Austria or Italy or South Africa? No. Because he's not out there campaigning. He's not campaigning for real history.
He's written it, and I respect his judgment. He decided preserve your reputation. Go to Cambridge, become masters in John's College, write the book, and let the real fighters go out there and do the fighting. And that's what I'm doing.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Lets go swimming in the 1930s
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Facts against the fake holocaust
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Points against the “Holocaust.” -Nuremberg was a show trial -None of the major Historical figures books at the times mention mass gassings -The allies broke the German enigma code and no discussion of a “Holocaust” exist. -no official order from Hitler. -No mention in Goebbels diaries -no chemical evidence on the so called “gas chambers” of mass gassings. -no mass graves -Plenty of incentive to continue the lie since Germany and the west are still paying reparations today….
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Rare pictures of the “holocaust” Clearly displays how degenerate some of the j3ws were
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Why did the j3ws embed the fake holocaust narrative into American k-12 classes? To brainwash, deceit, subvert history to the advantage
@GoUncensored - Uncensored.AI
Why did the McGraw Hill textbooks lie to us about World War 2? https://t.co/dfisWLjTOr
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3ws turned the holocaust narrative denial ILLEGAL in many countries’s justice systems
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
🚨 ‼️ Very Important fact! The Chemist Germar Rudolf, whose scientific report proved that the “gas Chambers” at Auschwitz did not exhibit chemical evidence of mass Gassings, was prosecuted for legal speech he made in America. In other words, if you deny the official Holocaust story in America, and if you travel to Germany, you can be prosecuted there for legal speech you made here. Be careful where you travel, and be cautious of the Twitter location update. X will have to follow the laws of the country it operates in…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Chernoff says: I’m very fortunate to have the First Amendment here and different laws, like, I mean, you Michael Chernoff stepped over your rights and sent you back. The Germans arrested me, of course they were waiting for me. I had to serve my initial fourteen months then. They put me on trial again for books I had published while I was in England and the United States where this was a completely legal operation. So they prosecuted me for activities that are done in countries where it was legal. And the reasoning is, well, everything is accessible over the Internet. If somebody can read it in Germany, it’s a crime. So they demand jurisdiction over the entire globe as soon as something is—or the entire universe, if you want.
The other person replies: Technically, I wonder if I could be arrested if I went to Germany. Yes. It’s crazy.
Michael Chernoff: And have keep all that stuff when I travel now.
The other person: Yeah. Don’t do it. Because your profile is high enough for them to bother.
Michael Chernoff: That that I could literally be arrested for going to Europe now. Yeah. I’m sorry. Sorry. That just hit my mind, but go on.
The other person: So we’ll put on trial for, actually, the pros give me for $9, every single one with up to five years. You do the math.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you know, America, I'm very fortunate to have the first amendment here in different laws and, like, I mean, you Michael Chernoff stepped over your rights and sent you back. But
Speaker 1: The Germans arrested me. Of course, they were waiting for me. I had to serve my initial fourteen months then. They put
Speaker 0: me You hadn't served the first fourteen months.
Speaker 1: Right. Because I'd run. Mhmm. Right? And then, they put me on trial again for books I had published while I was in England slash in The United States where this was a completely legal operation.
So they pros me prosecuted me for activities that are done in countries where it was legal. And the reasoning is, well, everything is accessible over the Internet. If somebody can read it in Germany, it's a crime. So they demand jurisdiction over the entire globe as soon as something is or the entire universe, if you want.
Speaker 0: Technically, I wonder if I could be arrested if I went to Germany. Yes. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: And have keep all
Speaker 0: that stuff when I travel now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Don't do it. Because your profile is high enough for them to bother.
Speaker 0: That that I could literally be arrested for going to Europe now. Yeah. I'm sorry. Sorry. That just hit my mind, but go go on.
That's just, like, shocking. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So we'll put on trial for, actually, the the pros give me for $9, every single one with up to five years. You do the math.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn J3wish holocaust denial laws
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
On Holocaust Denial Laws… Jake Shields- “They say you can have a defense, but you can’t bring any real defense, because they call a real defense Holocaust denial.” Germar Rudolf- “I never was allowed to take a stand as a witness. German judges are required by case law to systematically deny motions that contain that kind of evidence.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a judge threatening a witness with prosecution for testifying to their best knowledge and skills, saying that would make the witness criminally liable; asserts that such a threat by a judge constitutes a felony.
Speaker 1 adds that many countries (27) have strict limits on defenses, often labeling real defenses as holocaust denial, preventing witnesses that counter official narratives and effectively blocking a proper defense; calls the situation insane.
Speaker 0 reflects on lessons as an expert witness: he was never allowed to take a stand and was always moved off the stand. He states that German judges are obligated by case law to systematically deny any motion to introduce that kind of evidence, and that threats accompany this denial.
Speaker 1 responds, though the exact wording is unclear.
Speaker 0 recounts events from the early 1990s, noting that repeated appearances as a witness prompted panic and the introduction of new case law. He describes an incident where, in 1996, a defense lawyer wanted him to testify again, and the defense lawyer was prosecuted for merely filing a motion to introduce the evidence.
He explains that in Germany, the defense cannot introduce evidence; only the prosecution and the judges can introduce evidence. The defense is defenseless because a defendant must file a motion for the judge to introduce evidence, and the judge not only systematically denies it but the prosecution prosecutes the defense lawyer for filing the motion. This pattern is described as serious and as something upheld by the German Supreme Court. Since then, filing motions to defend oneself in historical matters is described as a crime, with the act of defending oneself seemingly criminalized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Be prosecuted for it. Used, and briefly summarizing what I would be testifying about and how my testimony would kinda look like. And then the presiding judge asked me whether I would really testify, in these terms because if I planned on doing that, I would be violating the law and I would be criminally liable and could be prosecuted for it. That is a judge threatening a witness with prosecution if it testifies to his best knowledge and skills. That is threatening a witness is a felony, but they are the judge doing it.
Speaker 1: I think this is extremely important for everyone to think about for a second because I think, what, 19 countries illegal? They don't 27. Yeah. 27. My god.
And in most of these places, they will not let you they say you can have a defense, but you can't bring a real defense because they call any real defense holocaust denial. So, like, you can't bring in witnesses that go against what their narrative is, and you can't even prevent a proper defense. This is absolute insanity.
Speaker 0: That that is the the lessons I first the first lesson I learned was as an expert witness. I never was allowed to take a stand as a witness. They always took me down. What I learned is that German, judges are obligated by case law to systematically deny any motion to introduce that kind of evidence. And with underhanded threats like I just
Speaker 1: told Put you put the
Speaker 0: That was in the early nineteen nineties Because I kept coming and kept appearing as a witness, so they kind of panicked, they introduced new case law. In one in one case, a a defense lawyer wanted to have me testify again in '96, and then they prosecuted the defense lawyer for having just filed a motion to introduce the evidence. Now in Germany, the defense can't even introduce evidence. In Germany, only the prosecution and the judges can introduce evidence. The defense is defenseless by Prince William or penal crimes.
For defending their clients. So the defendant has to file a motion for the judge to introduce it for them. The judge not only systematically denies it, but then the prosecution decides to prosecute the defense lawyer for just filing a motion. This is pretty serious. Gets convicted.
It's upheld by the supreme court in Germany. And ever since, filing motions to defend yourself in these historical matters is a crime. Defending yourself is
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn ✡️s war against Germans and their propaganda started well before WW1 & WW2
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Jake Shields- “Is it true newspapers used the term Holocaust and the number 6 million many many times before WW2?” Germar Rudolf- “Yes the New York Times was using the term Holocaust during the time of Tsarist Russia, before WW1.” https://t.co/dZnVGMxwR7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used.
Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened.
6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution.
Speaker 0: And
Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on.
There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies.
Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that—
Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many, many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used.
Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened.
6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution.
Speaker 0: And
Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on.
There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies.
So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Examined bodies and gas murders never happened
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Dr Charles Larson performed over 1k autopsies in German Concentration camps after the end of the War. Not one victim was documented as killed by “gassing.” Not one. https://t.co/mXiYDXsH9S
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn ✡️s sensationalism and exaggeration through propaganda and their fake survival stories
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Here are some disinfection chambers from Dachau…. Where they would use Zyklon b to gas the prisoners clothing and to prevent the spread of infection… Why would you delouse the clothing if you were just gonna kill them all?? 🧐 This was the real use of Zkylon B by the way, and matches up with the actual amounts ordered and the chemical evidence within the walls of various concentration camps…
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camps had doctors and health check ups Highlights of the fake ✡️ holocaust ✡️s are psychological and deceivers
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“If you actually look at some of the best documents from the Auschwitz camp, you can see huge efforts to save everyone’s life by improving hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complexes, and you even see the records of how they were (medically) treated.” -Germar Rudolf https://t.co/EGvINFnI0I
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In the best documented cases, the Auschwitz Camp, vast documentation shows how these order of save everyone's life is being implemented with huge efforts of improving sanitary hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complex complexes that treat inmates, and then you see the records of how they were treated, how all these people, these inmates unable to work. Mhmm. That's the cliche. If you're unfit for work and more than two weeks you get killed. You see the records of all these inmates, tens of thousands of them, being unable to work, being kept in hospitals, being fed, being cured, and until they are fit again and they get released.
It's lot of work. Massive amount of investment in most modern medicine of the time with x-ray investigations and surgeries and lab tests all over the place. Tens of hundreds of thousands of document proving that. And you look even in the financial side in today's dollars, almost a quarter billion dollars of money invested in order to get a medical facility going that is On Auschwitz? In Auschwitz.
In order for for the entire region, for every inmate that in the the greater part of of Poland and what is East Germany, all inmates who get sick and can't be treated in in the other camps get sent to Auschwitz into this massive hospital camp facility to get proper treatment. Mhmm. You look at the the technology they use. We don't know about Zyklon b saying it's being used to save Yeah. Their They're using Zyklon b to do To kill lives.
So Zyklon B is sent there to save lives, but what I'm getting at is to what 1944, Zyklon B kind of phases out because we have new technologies. DDT from today's perspective, unfortunately, but it worked better, and microwave delousing facilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, if you actually look in in the best documented cases, the Auschwitz Camp, vast documentation showing how these order of save everyone's life is being implemented with huge efforts of improving sanitary hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complex complexes that treat inmates, and then you see the records of how they were treated, how all these people, these inmates unable to work. Mhmm. That's the cliche. If you're unfit for work and more than two weeks you get killed. You see the records of all these inmates, tens of thousands of them, being unable to work, being kept in hospitals, being fed, being cured, and until they are fit again and they get released.
It's lot of work. Massive amount of investment in most modern medicine of the time with x-ray investigations and surgeries and lab tests all over the place. Tens of hundreds of thousands of document proving that. And you look even in the financial side in today's dollars, almost a quarter billion dollars of money invested in order to get a medical facility going that is On Auschwitz? In Auschwitz.
In order for for the entire region, for every inmate that in the the greater part of of of Poland and what is East Germany, all inmates who get sick and can't be treated in in the other camps get sent to Auschwitz into this massive hospital camp facility to get proper treatment. Mhmm. You look at the the technology they use. We don't know about Zyklon b saying it's being used to save Yeah. Their They're using Zyklon b to do To kill lives.
So Zyklon B is sent there to save lives, but what I'm getting at is to what 1944, Zyklon B kind of phases out because we have new technologies. DDT from today's perspective, unfortunately, but it worked better, and microwave delousing facilities.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The fake Holocaust exaggerations that have fooled Christian Americans for decades now
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Outrageous murder methods initially claimed during the Holocaust, but later proven false… - death by steam - death by vacuum - death by chlorine - death by engine exhaust - death by electrocution - death by delayed action numbing gas - death bridges - murder by defecation Jake Shields- “That doesn’t seem like a very practical way to kill people.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the history of reported murder methods at Holocaust sites, emphasizing that much of what was claimed during the war and immediately after is now considered false or unsubstantiated. They note that Treblinka is a focal point for what they describe as witness testimony chaos and ideas that “anything goes” in early claims, not just for Treblinka but as a pattern across camps.
Speaker 1 lists a variety of methods that were claimed at the time: death by steam; death by a vacuum (pumping air out of a chamber to suffocate); chlorine; engine exhaust gas claims; electrocution; killing with a delayed-action poison gas that would numb people who could still walk to mass graves and fall over them; mass gas chambers on a track where victims would roll over mass graves and be deposed through opening floors; a death bridge where people climbed onto a scaffold and were shot to death. He also mentions Belzec, where there were claims that people were murdered by defecation pits, with other Jews made to defecate on them until suffocation.
Speaker 0 comments that these descriptions do not seem practical as methods of killing. He reiterates Treblinka as a major example of “testimoniel anarchism” and “whatever you can come up with” in the wartime and immediate postwar period. He observes that the narrative that exists today is completely different from that chaotic testimony.
Speaker 1 notes further varieties, including chlorinated lime in trains that would kill people, and asserts that there are many such ideas that were invented when discussing homicidal gas chambers in encyclopedias. He mentions a chart showing “what was claimed once and what is still there?” as a reference to dropped death claims. He asks how the narrative moved from the chaotic, testimonial stage to the streamlined version presented today, in which Treblinka’s victims are said to have been killed with diesel engine exhaust. He adds that diesel exhaust is “technically impossible” because mainstream historians now acknowledge that diesel does not contain enough carbon monoxide to kill in the way claimed, implying that the diesel claim could not have been the mechanism.
Overall, the speakers describe a shift from a wide array of war-and-postwar claims about murder methods at camps to a different, more uniform narrative, and they question how that transition occurred, especially regarding Treblinka and the claim of diesel exhaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've talked about a lot of the Holocaust. This is a long in-depth, you know, subject. We probably talked about ten hours, but we'll go another twenty, thirty minutes. What's completely invented? We talked about exaggerations, but there's lots of things that are completely false too.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's stick to the stuff that the mainstream has actually accepted to be completely false.
Speaker 0: Say the gas chambers because we obviously think that's false.
Speaker 1: But Let's start on the level what the mainstream actually accepts. If we look at the murder methods that were claimed during the war and right after the war for one of the most iconic camps, and I'm not even talking about Auschwitz here, the most glaring example of, I would say, witness anarchy of anything goes and everything being invented and claimed is the Treblinka Camp. The methods claimed there during the war mainly were death by steam. Steam. But there were a lot of claims about death with a vacuum.
So just pumping the air out of the chamber and suffocating people that way. Mhmm. With chlorine, there were also engine exhaust gas claims, but then they had electrocution. Killing with a delayed action, poison gas that would just numb people, and then they could still walk by themselves conveniently to the mass graves and fall over there, or mass gas chambers that were on on a track, and they could roll over mass graves and depose their load with opening floors into them. Death bridge with people who had to climb up on a on a scaffold and were then shot and fall to the death.
In Belzec, they had a claim that people were murdered by shit. Jesus. They had to lay down in a in a a defecation pit, and other Jews had to shit on them until they suffocate.
Speaker 0: That doesn't seem very practical way to kill people.
Speaker 1: So if we look at Treblinka, and that was one of our bells, I I wanted to mention it because as I mentioned, it's It's it's Whatever you can come up with, anything goes. That was all coming up during and after the war. And the narrative we find today is something completely different. So where did all the the chlorine, the vacuum, the steam, the electrocution, the death bridges Where did it
Speaker 0: go? No one's talking about it. They wanna bury it.
Speaker 1: They had that chlorinated lime in in in trains that would kill people, all kinds of things. You'll find them all, invented when you're talking about homicidal gas chambers in the encyclopedia. It has a section about death claims that have been dropped, and I have a chart about it. Shows it. What was claimed once and what is still there?
How did we get from this complete chaos, the testimonial anarchy, to the streamlined narrative that we're told today in Treblinka, people people were killed with diesel engine exhaust, which, by the way, is technically impossible because even the mainstream historians have now explained and recognized that diesel does not have enough carbon monoxide in the exhaust to kill the way it is claimed. Can't have been diesel. But there was the narrative for decades now. How did
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jewish construct: inflation through numbers
@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields
Germar Rudolf discusses how concentration camps are constantly changing the number killed and always in the same direction https://t.co/W7tPQ5F6gZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the narrative about these camps was submitted by the Soviets in conjunction with the newly established Stalinist, communist Polish authorities. He highlights Majdanek as the most extreme case of the Soviets rigging their record, noting that it was the first of the major camps conquered by the Red Army. After the Red Army captured Majdanek, Soviet authorities claimed that two million people were killed there and in seven homicidal gas chambers. He emphasizes that in the documentation, each of these facilities is described as either a drying facility, a fumigation chamber, or something similar, with no trace of homicidal gas chambers.
He then cites a 2005 assessment by a new historian at the Auschwitz Museum, who made what he calls the ultimate drop down to seventy-eight thousand victims and reduced five of the seven homicidal gas chambers. From the initial figure of two million, the estimated victims are now down to seventy-eight thousand, which he notes is less than 4% of the original number.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Narrative about these camps was, of course, submitted by the Soviets in conjunction with the newly established Stalinist, communist, Polish authorities. The most extreme case of the Soviets rigging their record and recognized as such by mainstream historian is the Majdanek camp, which most listeners won't even know. It's a it's a now a completely minor camp, but it was the first one of the big camps that was conquered by the Red Army. So they conquered it, and they claimed right away two million people were killed here and in in seven homicidal gas chambers. With every single one of them, the documents show either it was a drying facility, it was a fumigation chamber, or something to that effect.
It there's no trace in the documentation about homicidal gas chambers. In 2005, the new, historian of the Auschwitz Museum makes the, so far, ultimate drop down to seventy eight thousand victims, drops five of the seven homicidal gas chambers. So we start with two million, we're down to seventy eight thousand. That's less than 4% of the original.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn No “final solution” order ever existed
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“Heinrich Himmler read about the propaganda that “Nazis we’re turning Jews into soap” and he issued an order to his underlings, when a Jew dies nothing is to happen with that body except burial or cremation.” -Germar Rudolf https://t.co/1l4lDsZsIN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses claims about the Nazi regime’s treatment of Jewish bodies in death. They recount that Himmler, outraged by propaganda about soap, issued an order that under no circumstances could a Jewish body be used for anything other than burial or cremation. The point is made that this instruction was a top-down directive, and that the dead were to be treated with strict reverence, with no body parts to be repurposed.
The speaker notes that these statements run counter to the well-known rumors about using Jewish bodies to manufacture soap, lampshades, or other products. The implication is that such sensational claims were not permitted to occur, as an official prohibition was in place. The claim is that there was an SS investigation into a Buchenwald commander for alleged misdeeds related to the treatment of inmates, including extreme abuses that would implicate illegal activities with bodies or embezzlement and murder.
It is stated that the Buchenwald commander was executed, but not for the alleged attempts to turn inmates’ bodies into soap or other items. Instead, the commander was executed for killing inmates who were whistleblowers and for embezzlement, while the speakers maintain that this was supposed to be in line with mainstream Nazi policy to turn Jews into soap and similar acts. The speaker emphasizes that the order was from the top down, forbidding such activities, and that those who violated it would be prosecuted mercilessly and executed.
The narrative then asserts that the policy or order to stop such practices was halted by the end of the war, as many cases could not be prosecuted any longer. In sum, the speaker presents a picture of an official prohibition against the desecration or exploitation of dead bodies, contrasted with sensational rumors, and notes that prosecutions could not be pursued to completion as the war ended.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Got stuck with the soap when Visa was making his propaganda about the soap. Himmler read about that. Bad big bad Himmler who is supposed to have run all these deportations, camps, and extermination operations, the head of the SS, Heinrich Schimmler. And he instantly issued an order to his underlings that we know all that Jews are dying under the circumstances they have to live in the camps and so forth. Whenever there is a Jewish body, nothing else is allowed to happen with that body but either burial or cremation.
Really? So it goes in order out. Don't mess with any dead person. You don't are not allowed to use any body part for anything. They need to be buried or burned.
That goes against soap. That goes against lampshade. That goes against frunk and head. That goes against anything. It was cleared from top down, and there was actually a criminal investigation by the SS itself in against the Buchenwald commander who was suspected to have done like that during the war.
Really? And they actually executed that commander for infractions. They couldn't prove lampshades or anything. They could prove that he had embezzled large funds, and they were suspecting and were on on this hot on pursuit to to show that he actually killed inmates who were whistleblowers, and then eventually was executed. He was executed for Right.
For killing inmates who have to do actually mainstream Nazi policy to turn Jews into soap and sharpen their heads and whatever. No. He it was the order from top down, it's forbidden, and we're gonna prosecute everyone who does it anyway mercilessly, and you're gonna get executed. That's so interesting. Self cleansing.
It was stopped cold by the end of the war because a lot of these cases couldn't be prosecuted anymore. They were pending, and then, of course, at the end of the war, nothing was possible anymore.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Every jewish senior is a survivor 🤣🤣🤣🤡🌎✡️👺
@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢
They never stop talking about it, do they? https://t.co/2cFdOr3IXu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses a hostage situation involving 50 people, specifying that among the hostages are Holocaust survivors as well as grandmothers and their grandchildren. The speaker then asks, “Who takes hostage grandmothers?” highlighting the unusual image of grandmothers being taken hostage and incidentally noting that, “they always for some odd reason, like, no matter what year it is, there's always Holocaust survivors.” The speaker comments on the longevity of these individuals, remarking, “You guys notice that, bro? Like, every Jewish grandma is a fucking Holocaust survivor, bro. I'm still trying to figure out how these niggas live so long.” The statement continues with the assertion, “Like, goddamn. Niggas knew Hitler personally.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 50 people hostage. And those included Holocaust survivors, grandmothers, grandmothers, their grandchildren. Who takes hostage grandmothers? You know what's interesting, bro? They always for some odd reason, like, no matter what year it is, there's always Holocaust survivors.
You guys notice that, bro? Like, every Jewish grandma is a fucking Holocaust survivor, bro. I'm still trying to figure out how these niggas live so long. Like, goddamn. Niggas knew Hitler personally.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Jews sent their own to the work camps to steal their wealth to begin a zionist political plan to create the terrorist state of Israel
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
The jews sent their own to the camps. Ben Gurion made a deal with Eichmann. jews needed money. Germany needed workers. Ben Gurion stole the wealth of thousands of Hungarian jews and put them on the train. Then used it to build the biblical nation state of Israel. https://t.co/GYQVjmJ5kX
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Work camp deaths had a paper trail
@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢
Rare Clip 🚨 Is it true that ‘in Auschwitz, when there was a natural death, you had more than 20 signatures from doctors and all that’? https://t.co/AjsbCzBeyq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the Germans recorded everything at Auschwitz: for a natural death there were more than 20 signatures from doctors and officials, and for a non-natural death (suicide, execution, etc.) there were more than 30 signatures. He mentions the "Totten Grusher" death registers of Auschwitz. He asks, do you know where they are? In Moscow. Since 1945, those registers have not been published. He argues that if the real figures of the dead were added, it would be impossible to believe that 4,000,000 died in Auschwitz as inscribed on the monument, or 1,000,000 as some say, or 700,000 as others claim. He emphasizes that proof is needed for everything and expresses bewilderment that more than forty years after the event, people are “swallowing everything.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because you must know that the Germans took notice of everything. Do you know that in Auschwitz, when there was one natural death, you had more than 20 signatures from doctors and all that. When it was a non natural death, suicide, execution, etcetera, you had more than 30 signatures. And the Totten Grusher The death registers. Death registers of Auschwitz.
Do you know where they are? In Moscow. Why since 1945, why those registers have not been published? Because if you add the real figures of the dead people, it would be impossible to believe that 4,000,000 died in Auschwitz like it inscribed on the monument or 1,000,000, like says, or 700,000 as another another one says, etcetera, etcetera. You must understand that we need for everything, we need proof.
I don't understand that forty more than forty years after the world, people are like that, swallowing everything.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Hitler refused to use gas The gas chambers are a fabrication and a lie created by jews
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
“Isn’t it ironic, that the guy who is most famous for gassing people (Hitler) refused to use poison gas that would have won the war for him?” -Dan Bilzerian https://t.co/u62cmjtlqe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that it’s logistically absurd to claim the Holocaust involved gassing millions and hauling bodies from so-called gas chambers, noting the inefficiency of that method. He points out the irony that the person most famous for gassing people refused to use gas that could have won the war, because he would not be the first to use gas, despite having 20,000 kilograms of tabun and sarin. He asserts there were no counters to that chemical weapon, yet the decision not to use gas led to the downfall of his country.
Speaker 1 adds that Hitler was gassed himself at the end of World War I, which blinded him. During the fall of the Kaiser’s empire, the Reich’s collapse and the emergence of Bolshevik and Weimar structures occurred as some German states did not join the Weimar Republic and became sub-states or Soviet-like entities.
Speaker 0 emphasizes that anyone uncertain about Hitler’s legacy should read Mein Kampf and hear from Hitler’s own words to understand why he held his beliefs. He claims Hitler did not begin as an anti-Semite intent on killing Jews, and describes Hitler as someone who admired and observed the universe, was a truth-seeker from day one, engaged in political discussions, and was fascinated by philosophy, German history, the British Empire, and America. He notes Hitler was well-read and well-spoken, but deprived economically, working as a day laborer with little work available to feed himself. He claims Hitler went days without food to afford a book, showing a love of knowledge, and that he wasn’t a failed artist; he was a talented artist whose path could have been architecture rather than drawing.
Speaker 0 contends that smear campaigns against Hitler fail and are “nonsense.” He dismisses more extreme claims as false, such as insults about Hitler’s sexuality or anatomy, and mentions that such accusations are common against many figures.
Speaker 1 comments that a lot of the negative rumors about Hitler (e.g., perverse claims) are typical allegations made against many people, implying they are not unique to Hitler.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and I think a common thing with the Holocaust that people don't think about is, like, how logistically ridiculous it would be to gas 6,000,000 or 4,000,000 people and then have to, like, haul those bodies out of a, you know, a shower that was a supposed gas chamber. Like, the logistics of that are so ridiculous. People don't stop and think about that. Like, how inefficient of a way that would be to kill people. And then they also don't talk about the fact that it's a it would be a little bit ironic that the guy that's the most famous for gassing people refused to use the gas that would have won the war for him because he had, like, what was it, 20,000 kilograms of of taboon and sarin where, like, he he could have absolutely stopped Normandy in his tracks.
We didn't have any counters to that. They invented this nerve gas, and he refused to use it to his death and his country's, you know, like, the fall of his country. Right? He was so against gas that He was willing to die and let his country fall so as not to violate, you know, the the the the agreement that he had that he would not be the first to use gas. I just find that a little ironic.
Speaker 1: A lot of that is because he was gassed himself at the end of the first war. He was he was gassed.
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 1: And it actually blinded him. And during the fall of the the Kaiser's empire, the Kaiser's Reich, which then started the the Bolshevik and Weimar Republics, because some of the German states didn't become part of the Weimar Republic. They actually became, like, communist Soviets. They became, like, substates. And while that was going on, he was blinded, and he was in a hospital.
And it's really important, I think, that anyone that is iffy about the legacy of Adolf Hitler or about the kind of man that he was, they should read Mein Kampf, and they should hear from his own words as to why he had the beliefs that he had. And he didn't start his journey being this anti Semite that wants to kill all the Jews and, like, that's not that's not the story of Adolf Hitler. The story of Adolf Hitler is someone who I admire, someone that deeply observed the universe before making a judgment. He was a truth seeker from day one. He engaged in political discussions with anyone that he could.
He was fascinated by, you know, philosophy. He was fascinated by German history. He was fascinated by the the British and, you know, the British Empire, you know, and America. And, you know, he was a very well read and well spoken young man who, by the nature of of, you know, the the poor economic circumstances, he was impoverished. And he was he was fundamentally a a day laborer in slavery fighting for his daily bread, working one or two days a week because there was just not enough laboring to go go around to feed himself.
And he talks about in Mein Kampf going days without food so that he could afford a book, so he could read a book because he had that much of a of a a love of knowledge. And he wasn't a failed artist. He was such a good artist in his particular style. He was encouraged to become an architect and not a, you know, kind of creative drawer. So it's like two different drawing pathways.
And so all the smear campaigns against Adolf Hitler, they all fall flat on their face. They're all nonsense. Like and then there's obviously the more retarded ones like, oh, he had one testicle. He raped his knees. He was on
Speaker 0: a a dick they're saying. Yes. Now they're saying a small dick. Yeah. You know,
Speaker 1: which they say about anyone.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Hitler never utilized gases at his disposal
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
“Hitler had the power to gas millions with Tabun & Sarin—but refused.” -David Irving Why? (For educational/historical/discussion purposes only.) https://t.co/6UxoiCvKST
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Adolf Hitler and poison gases, noting that Hitler possessed two nerve gases, Tabun and Sarin, against which none of the Allies had any defense. Despite this, Hitler ordered that these poison gases not be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. The speaker asserts there are contradictions here that historians should have investigated, claiming to have spent thirty years in archives and even offering rewards for any evidence, yet suggesting that if such evidence exists, others would have found it.
The argument pivots to the expectation of traceable chain-of-command documentation. The speaker points out the many people involved in the process—from the individual writing the teletype message on one end to the recipient at the other end, with twenty copies at each end—and argues that even if official files were destroyed, someone would have written home or kept a diary. The speaker asserts that such evidence should be in the records because Hitler’s other crimes are documented in various forms.
Specific documented crimes and orders attributed to Hitler are listed:
- Euthanasia: an actual order with Hitler’s signature, issued sometime in 1940 but backdated to the first day of the war, with Hitler’s euthanasia order in the files with the Signicharlotter.
- The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, with those commissars described as political officers attached to the Russian armed forces; the order is documented in the military files of the day.
- The order to kill British commandos, noted as a particularly sore point for Canadians, with Hitler’s order from October 1942 in the files, described as a criminal order and adequately documented.
- The order to kill the male population of Stalingrad after capturing the city, recorded in the private diary of General Helder (Haldbr).
- The order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944, also attributed to Hitler, and documented.
The speaker then raises an interesting question about Hitler’s character: how could he unhesitatingly issue orders that are crimes under international law, such as the order to kill prisoners, while at the same time ordering that poison gas not be used to avoid violating the Geneva Convention? The speaker notes that poison gas could have potentially changed the course of the war—specifically, around the Normandy Beachhead in July 1944, when it was established and near breakout—arguing that use of nerve gases against which Allied troops had no gas masks could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead. The speaker contends that Hitler could have won the war by pulling out the Panzer divisions and redeploying them to the Eastern Front, potentially mopping up the Eastern Front in two to three months, but He did not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Adolf Hitler who we told we're told is such a mass criminal, he had in his hands two poison gases, Tabun, t a b u n, and Sarin, s a r I n. These are nerve gases against which none of the allies had any defense. Yet Hitler ordered that these poison gases not to be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. We're up against contradictions here which historians should long ago have investigated. Believe me, in thirty years working in the archives, even if I find it, somebody else would have found one line of evidence.
And I've offered rewards, thousand times, for anyone who can find one line of evidence. And you expect that in the chain of command from, say, Hitler or Himmler, right down to the man who is actually pulling the lever, there would be so many people involved, like the guy who's this diamond who writes out the teletype message at one end, and the guy who receives it at the other end, and there are 20 copies at each end, and then even if all those messages are destroyed in the official files, somebody's gonna be writing home to his mother saying, we've been doing something awful. I I can't tell you what it is. There's gonna be some shred of paper. Somebody's writing a diary, doctor Goebbels or Hans Frank or someone, and they can't find it.
And it should be there because all Hitler's other crimes are there. Euthanasia. There's his actual order with his signature on it. It was issued sometime in the 1940, but he backdated it to the first day of the war. Hit Hitler's euthanasia order is in the files with the Signicharlotter.
The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, the the commissars, which were the kind of political officers attached to the Russian armed forces. Hitler ordered their order to be liquidated, and that order is documentaries in the military files of the day. His order to kill British commandos, which of course is a particularly sore point for Canadians. That hitter order of October 1942 is in the files. It's a criminal order and is per adequately documented.
His order for killing of the male population of Stalingrad succeeded in capturing Stalingrad. That is recorded in the private diary of General Helder, h a l d b r. So all these other Hitler the order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944. That was also a Hitler order, that's also there. This raises the interesting question.
What kind of character was Hitler that he would unhesitatingly issue orders which are are crimes under international law, like the order to kill prisons. And yet he ordered that on no account was poison gas to be used because it would convicted of the G Convention. Although he could undoubtedly upturned, for example, the course of the Normandy battle. At the time the Normandy Beachhead had been established in July 1944, and it was about to break the allied horse about to break out, who could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead using the nerve gases against which we had no gas masks. He could have won the war.
He could have pulled out the panzer division, sent them back to the Eastern Front, mopped up the Eastern Front in in two months, three months, and won the war. But he didn't.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Lets add x rays to ensure no broken bones in the work camps Jews are allergic to physical labor and work in general. Their wealth is earned by unnatural and exploitative methods https://t.co/VhkzroEfeQ
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Treblinka Jews cover their fake non existent dead jews with cement so no one ever discovers the truth
@ShieldsClips - Fight Back Podcast
"There's no dead jews buried in Treblinka" https://t.co/2YftEQdMuB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that the Treblinka massacre is a fraud and that there are no dead Jews buried at Treblinka. They claim that while Auschwitz is often debunked, Treblinka has been neglected in discussion, and that Jews have “recreated the Treblink [Treblinka] myth,” now saying that the victims were buried at Treblinka Two. According to Speaker 0, when intelligence bodies attempted to verify the grave, ground-penetrating radar was used to locate a mass grave of 975 Jews, but the area showed ground that has “never been disturbed,” with density consistent with thousands of years of undisturbed soil.
They further claim that in response, the Jews constructed a Holocaust memorial at the site called Treblinka Two, where large amounts of concrete and rocks were poured and placed over the ground. This, Speaker 0 notes, was done so that future ground-penetrating radar studies could not be performed, effectively preventing further investigation. They describe the memorial construction as a deliberate disruption of the site in order to block scientific verification.
The overall narrative presented by Speaker 0 is that the historical understanding of Treblinka is manipulated, with a shift from a buried mass grave to an alternative interpretation tied to Treblinka Two, and that subsequent memorialization has physically altered the site to thwart investigative methods. The speaker emphasizes the denial of the Treblinka burial site’s existence and portrays memorial efforts as a means to obstruct verification.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is a complete fraud, and there's there's no dead Jews buried at Treblinka. They they can't find any, and apparently 975,000. You know, people talk about Auschwitz a lot, which is obviously very easy to debunk, but people skip over Treblinka, and the Jews have now recreated the Treblink Treblinka myth, and they're now saying that, no, they weren't buried at Treblinka, they were buried at Treblinka two. And so then when some intelligence bodies crossed. Yeah.
Exactly. So then they did the ground penetrating radar to try and find this mass grave of 975 Jews, and it turns out the ground has never been disturbed in that area ever. The density is consistent with thousands of years of an an disrupted ground. And so then what the Jews did was they built a holocaust memorial at so called Treblinka Two, where they just poured like tons and tons of concrete and put tons and tons of rocks all over the ground, so you can never do that study again. You can never do the ground penetrating radar because they've disrupted the site as a part of their their, you know, memorial.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn Rockwell and holocaust number
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
George Lincoln Rockwell speaks about Hitler, jewish math calculations and Mein Kampf. For educational/historical/discussion purposes only. https://t.co/TAGBX5FfRY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the claim of six million Jews is unfounded and inconsistent with historical numbers. He notes that the “6,000,000 Jews” claim would require crediting Jews for having nine lives, since “these Jewish gas Jews show up again and again and again all over the world,” not only in the speaker’s country. He states that the Jewish Encyclopedia lists, in 1932 and ’33, only two and a half million Jews in the entire area where Hitler could have been, including Russia, and he asks how Hitler could be accused of gassing six million Jews in a region with only about two and a half million Jews.
He contends he would be grateful if the Jews would explain this discrepancy, and he asserts they have never done so. The speaker declares that the “6,000,000 Jews” claim is “the biggest of all the big lies that has ever been told.” Turning to Mein Kampf, he notes that the book describes Jews as “the great masters of the lie” and says that their “big lie technique” is their biggest technique, describing it as “a selfie technique by which the Jews tell an enormous lie,” and stating that Hitler does not embed or advocate this, but condemns it as vile. He asserts that this big lie technique is exactly what is happening in “our country today.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, what about the 6,000,000? Well, one of the easiest questions to take care of, actually, is the 6,000,000 Jews. These people, these Jews, if this were true, the 6,000,000 Jews, sorry, you would have to give the Jews credit for being more clever than the cats for having nine lives because these Jewish gas Jews show up again and again and again all over the world, not just here. The Jewish encyclopedia, which you can consult, and as you can see in all my literature, lists in 1932 and '33 only two and a half million Jews for the entire area, everywhere the Hitler possibly could have been. There were only two and a half million Jews in Russia.
He was accused of gassing 6,000,000 Jews in a two and a half million Jew area. I would be very grateful if the Jews would explain this to me. They've never done it. I think it's I think the 6,000,000 Jews stuff, that's the biggest of all the big lies that has ever been told. And while we're at that subject, let me point out that in Mein Kampf, we hear forever about Hitler's big lie.
If you will read and study in Mein Kampf, you look at the actual book rather than just listen to Jews like William L. Shirer telling about it, you will discover that Hipper says in Mein Kampf that the Jews are the great masters of the lie, and he says that their biggest technique is what he calls the big lie technique. And he says it's vile. He not only didn't embed it, he doesn't advocate it. He says it is a selfie technique by which the Jews tell an enormous lie, and it's so big that nobody ever suspects them.
That's exactly what's going on in our country today.
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn 26 million 🤣
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn The real jew is a nomad He has nothing but destruction and wickedness
@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️
@badazn David irving offer money for proof of a holocaust Money has NEVER been collected
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
In 1977 Historian David Irving has offered 1000 pounds to any historian, private person or institute who can find one wartime document showing that Adolf Hitler knew about anything “nasty happening to any jews” during World War II The money has never been collected to this day. https://t.co/zgQoUd08Ui