reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @xumas_iq

Saved - August 18, 2024 at 1:54 AM

@xumas_iq - Xumas

America wanted to humiliate Saddam Hussein with a televised trial, instead he humiliated them https://t.co/r96eydlm0m

Saved - August 1, 2024 at 9:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the complex and secretive dealings between Israel and Iran, starting from Khomeini's initial communications with Israel in late 1978. Following Khomeini's rise to power, Israel sold arms to Iran, facilitating Jewish emigration. Khomeini's strategic decisions, including delaying hostage releases to influence U.S. elections, were intertwined with arms deals. The U.S.-Israeli Joint Committee supported Iran during the Iraq War, providing intelligence and arms, while Israel used profits from these trades to fund political agendas and settlements. Even post-war, Iran continued oil supplies to Israel.

@xumas_iq - Xumas

The Secret Dealings of Israel and Iran The $240 Billion Weapons Trade and How Iran Funded Settlements in the West Bank 🧵A Thread https://t.co/CMEK69183N

@xumas_iq - Xumas

A month before Khomeini returned to Iran, the Israelis communicated with Khomeini They wanted to know where he stood He assured them that the Arab States was his priority December 1978 https://t.co/ghzkf04VOs

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Only a year after Khomeini came to power, the first weapons deal between Iran and Israel took place. Israel sold Iran spareparts for F4 Phantom Planes and weapons and In return Khomeini was to allow large numbers of Jews to leave for Israel April 1980 https://t.co/HBaCcwVyzM

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Khomeini then conspired with Israel in the October Surprise to let Ronald Reagan win the elections In short, Khomeini would not release the American hostages until after the U.S Election so Jimmy Carter would lose the elections. October 1980 https://t.co/WA8o0ICa8F

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the "October surprise" theory, where the Reagan campaign allegedly delayed the release of American hostages in Iran to help win the election. The hostages were released shortly after Reagan's inauguration, raising suspicions of a deal. Reagan denied direct involvement but hinted at campaign interference. The timing of the release was seen as suspicious by many.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The so called October surprise. Speaker 1: But they refer to it as the October surprise. October surprise. October surprise. Speaker 2: If true, it would be an act of political treachery bordering on treason. Speaker 3: Good evening. The US embassy in Tehran has been invaded and occupied by Iranian students. The Americans inside have been taken prisoner. Speaker 0: At the end of Carter's first term, there were dozens of American hostages taken in Iran. Speaker 1: With each day that passes, our concern grows for the health and for the well-being of the hostages. Speaker 4: The hostage issue, if successfully handled, could be a political boom for president Carter. If bungled, however, it could help deprive him of reelection. Speaker 5: The Reagan campaign was obsessed with the issue. They believed a hostage release was the only way Jimmy Carter's election could be saved. Speaker 6: Do you really think Iranian terrorist would have taken Americans hostage if Ronald Reagan were president? Speaker 0: Michael says that the Reagan campaign wanted the hostages to stay in Iran, which would make Carter look weak and give the Reagan campaign an edge. Speaker 7: They said, we gotta do something. And I had a lot of, personal connections in Iran. Michael said that he went to Iran in 1980 with Earl Bryant. Earl Bryant, he's a Farsi language specialist and he had to choose with the Reagan administration. He said the 2 of them transferred in excess of $40,000,000 This money was used to buy off the new Iranian government. And the, hostages were kept until after the election. Speaker 8: Good morning, everybody. The surprise landslide election for Ronald Reagan. Speaker 9: A rather large number of Reagan voters saying that they cast their votes because of mister Carter's handling of the hostage situation. Speaker 2: I, Ronald Reagan, do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president Speaker 7: The hostages from the US Embassy, they were released within hours after he was sworn in. Speaker 8: The timing did strike many, many people as peculiar. And a lot of people suspected that some kind of a deal had been done. Speaker 2: Was there a deal? Did the Reagan campaign tamper with the hostage's fate? Speaker 7: Every effort on my part was directed toward bringing them Speaker 1: home. Is that being in contact with the Iranian government? Not by me. No. By your campaign, perhaps? Well, I can't get into details. Speaker 7: Some of those things are still quite Thank you very much.

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Shortly before taking the hostages, Khomeini's defence minister paid one of the hostages $5 million for the resumption of weapons deliveries Israel also continued to provide arms to Iran in this period https://t.co/7lKyJYU2W6

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Khomeini was promised by the CIA and Israel more arms deliveries, once the hostages were released Iran in the end recieved $52 Million funnel through Saudi Arabia for 52 hostages by the U.S. https://t.co/XJ3dkbBjgf

@xumas_iq - Xumas

As soon as Reagan became President, the approval for weapons sale to Iran was approved Israel started fully supporting Iran, to the extent they formed a Joint Committee https://t.co/uMKG7BA4BV

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Between 1981-1987, Iran purchased weapons for over $240 Billion (adjusted for inflation) from the U.S.-Israeli Joint Committee https://t.co/U26Zz1ag68

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Mohsen Kangarlu also reveals that the U.S. said " We will make you win the war" and that they had no issue with Khomeini He was one of the Iranian officials responsible for contacts with Israel/U.S. He recorded the interview on condition that it be shown after his death https://t.co/y0isUXissc

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Albert Hakim confirms that they wanted to cooperate with Iran to depose Saddam and gave security guarantees to Iran incase of the Soviet's invaded Albert Hakim testimony during the Iran-Contra Investigations also corrobates Mohsen Kangarlu's testimony https://t.co/mJyabF1XfE

Video Transcript AI Summary
General Secord proposed cooperating with Iran to remove the Iraqi president. The idea was part of a delegation's attitude, including Colonel North, Mr. Cave, and General Secord. The "we" mentioned refers to the United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And said to the Iranians, we will cooperate to depose the leader, the president of Iraq? Is that what he was saying? Speaker 1: He, as I mentioned, he left these with me to use as ideas for, patching up things. Speaker 0: Well, I mean, was it you who was saying that we will cooperate to depose? Speaker 1: No. General Secord wrote this. Speaker 0: Okay. So that and it was General Secord who also said it, wasn't it? Didn't he say did he say it to the Iranians or did he not? Speaker 1: I think it was more than genocide court. If I recall correctly, it was the attitude of the total delegation. Speaker 0: By that, you mean Colonel North? Speaker 1: As well as, mister Cave and general Secord. Speaker 0: Now is the we we will cooperate, is that the enterprise or is that again the United States of America? Speaker 1: My understanding is, the US.

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Israel used the profits from the arms trade with Iran for primarily 3 things: - Fund the Likud Party - Fund false flag Israeli controlled "Palestinian Terrorists" to tarnish the Palestinian cause - Build Settlements in the West Bank & Gaza https://t.co/AU5eEzu5L2

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Mohsen Kangarlu also admits that the only Major Military Victory, Iran had after 1982 would be impossible without U.S. Support. Mohsen Kangarlu, former advisor to the Iranian P.M & Presdient. https://t.co/CpZRPAVpws

@xumas_iq - Xumas

The U.S. provided Iran with correct intel of Iraqi positions. In the picture below IRGC Soldiers are spotted with SPOT Satellite pictures in the background. The U.S. at the same time fed Iraq false intelligence, through 3rd parties on Iranian positions. https://t.co/wws5jEdxYl

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Israeli Intelligence Officer Aharon Yariv explains why an Iraqi Victory is not in the favor of Israel and why they should support Iran. https://t.co/sdCi7HwAit

Video Transcript AI Summary
We do not want Iraq to achieve a clear victory in the war, as it may lead them to focus on us and the Israeli issue if they become a dominant power in the Persian Gulf and Arab world. A decisive Iraqi victory is not beneficial for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the question is how the war will end. We do not have an interest in a clear cut smashing Iraqi victory. A clear cut smashing Iraqi victory, making Iraq the power in the Persian Gulf, might free its energies also to look towards us. If not for the reason if not only for the reason that Iraq wants to play a leading will then want to fulfill its leading role in the Arab world. And you know that if one wants to play a leading role in the Arab world, he has to tackle the Israeli problem as well. So smashing victory is not in our favor.

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Israel ultimately decides to sell Iran poison and mustard gas factories https://t.co/erMRcRJQQ2

@xumas_iq - Xumas

Even after the war ended, Iran continued to provide Israel with oil https://t.co/VSeSZRHKHc

View Full Interactive Feed