TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @BasedSamParker

truthtroll_X
Posted - June 25, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 3:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the shocking confession of Adam Sheafe, who admitted to murdering Arizona pastor Bill Schonemann, claiming it was a commandment to eliminate evil from Israel. He revealed a chilling plan to kill 14 Christian pastors nationwide, starting with four in Arizona. He was close to executing more attacks, even preparing thorn crowns for their crucifixions. The gravity of his intentions is hard to fathom.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🚨 Adam Sheafe (see jewish neck tattoo) has confessed to crucifying Arizona pastor ✝️ Bill Schonemann. “It’s a commandment to rid Israel of evil” He believes anyone who says Jesus is the son of God deserves to die. But this was part of a much bigger plan. 🧵1/3 🗣️interview by @BrianaWhitney

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker admits to murdering Pastor Bill for breaking the first commandment. He drove to Bill's house and crucified him against the wall in the image of Jesus with a crown of thorns. He felt no remorse, believing he was saving families from false teachings. He had a hit list of 14 pastors around the nation, starting in Arizona, and planned to end in Phoenix. After the murder, he fled to Sedona, targeting two more priests, but was apprehended after a high-speed chase. He had leather tags and thorn crowns prepared for them. His planned destinations included Las Vegas, Portland, Seattle, Billings, Detroit, New York, Charlotte, Mobile, Beaumont, and El Paso. He claims he will execute every priest and burn every church if given the authority. He believes God will forgive his sins because he is ridding the earth of evil, following God's command to execute those who preach false gods. He acknowledges that God didn't tell him to murder pastors, but he did it on his own.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you had no previous contact with pastor Bill? Speaker 1: Zero. I didn't want any any any any previous contact. My my only criteria was you're breaking the first commandment. Speaker 0: But pastor Bill was Innocent? Speaker 1: In your perspective, if I there's nothing worse But not yours. But there's nothing worse than breaking the first commandment. I drove from there to Phil's house, like, two in the morning on a Sunday night, and I executed him. It's fast. I mean, it's you know, I I just I I I didn't want it I didn't want it to be bloody. I didn't want it to be a painful I'm not trying to torture the guy. I just wanted to execute him quickly. Put him in a cross position on the wall, and I screwed him to the wall. And then I had a crown of thorns I put on his head. So he's he's crucified against the wall with the, you know, in the image of Jesus. Because what I'm saying is, you know, what you're preaching is not what God said. It's the opposite of what God said. Speaker 0: Most people that would come into that scene, Bill's murder scene would be horrified. Horrified. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Were you feeling satisfied? Speaker 1: I wasn't you know, I mean, look, I'm not it's not in my heart to go around killing people. Speaker 0: You also have a family. Bill has a family. Mhmm. Did you think about that at all? Speaker 1: No. I'm thinking about the families that are in utter destruction, you know, by by following these false teachings and not obeying God and not giving our creator the respect for giving families life to begin with. Speaker 0: How would you feel though if somebody crucified you? Good luck trying. Do you think you're a monster? Speaker 1: Do I think I'm a monster? No. Speaker 0: It's a gruesome killing of another person. Most people would consider that monstrous. Speaker 1: Sure. Of course think you are. No. I see myself as more of a like a saint. Speaker 0: So when did this plan come to fruition? You're you're thinking about this. You wanna carry out this hit list? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: A hit list. Sure. 14 pastors. Speaker 1: That's right. Around the nation. To surround the nation. Speaker 0: Starting in Arizona? Speaker 1: Starting in Arizona where I was born. Where it starts is where it ends, like the Garden Of Eden. I start in Phoenix where I was born on this life, and I'm gonna end in Phoenix where I was baptized, which I don't appreciate when I was three years old by my parents. You know, I'm baptized in a belief that it's completely false. Speaker 0: So you get to Phoenix. Speaker 1: I get to Phoenix. I I I just set up a tent under a tree on Olive Street, and I followed that priest home Sunday after Easter's service. And when he pulled into his driveway, the two women came out of the garage. I'm not interested in executing anyone other than the pastors or the shepherds leading the flock astray. I need to find pastors or priests that live alone. Speaker 0: If you had gotten away with Bill's murder, where were you gonna go next? Speaker 1: That's where I got caught was In Yeah. In Sedona. I had both of the leather tags made out, both of the thorn crowns. Yeah. Where'd you get a thorn crown? In the desert. You know, the trees with the thorns on them. I cut it and make a crown of thorns. I just in a circle, you know? So I had both of those priests in my target. I was in route of getting into the back of the car of the second priest and an old lady got in front of me. I had lost my vehicle because I got a high speed chase with the police and the stolen truck in Sedona. I escaped. I ran up a mountain. I got away from all the cops. I hiked all the way back to my tent, and I was still, you know, on target for those two priests. But I wanted my target so bad that I I refused to leave, so I hiked all the way back. Had I had a vehicle, those two were were were done. They didn't have a chance in hell. From there was Las Vegas, Nevada Portland, Oregon Seattle, Washington Billings, Montana Detroit, Michigan New York, New York Charlotte, North Carolina Mobile, Alabama Beaumont, Texas and El Paso, Texas. So four of them are gonna get hit in Arizona. Speaker 0: So you have zero remorse for this kill? Not only Speaker 1: do I have zero remorse, I plan on fulfilling what I started. If my father puts me in an authoritative position on this earth, I will execute every single priest and burn every church to the the ground. Speaker 0: I mean, it's likely you'll be imprisoned for the rest of your life. Speaker 1: That's what you think. I want the death penalty because I wanna show you, you can't kill God's son. That whole story is b s. Speaker 0: So if you're given the death penalty, it's not likely you'll be executed quickly. Speaker 1: Well, I want it quickly so that we can get this show on the road and show exactly what I'm trying to do. All you gotta do is just worship Jesus and you go to heaven. Your your sins are all forgiven. That's not what god said. But do you Speaker 0: think god was going to forgive your sins? Speaker 1: Absolutely. He'll forgive my sins. He forgives he's a forgiving God. He's a living God. Speaker 0: How do you justify that? I mean, you're killing somebody or multiple people attempted. Speaker 1: Okay. But it's a commandment to to to to rid Israel of evil. I have a plan to rid this earth of evil. Speaker 0: You do realize most people look at this and think this is this is insane. Speaker 1: Good. And I'm glad they think that. But when reality strikes, it'll strike hard. From your perspective, that's murder, thou shall not kill. That is one of the 10 commandments. Mhmm. But also, god commands that if anybody is to preach that anyone other than him is god, we are to stone them to death or we are to execute them. And so I'm following that law. Speaker 0: You've interpreted this how you Speaker 1: interpret it. And that's how God that that that's the way God commanded it. Speaker 0: I I don't think I don't think God said, go go murder pastors. He just didn't. Speaker 1: He didn't tell me to do that. Absolutely not. I did that on my own.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

“Adam Sheafe’s calculated plan was to kill 14 Christian ✝️ pastors all over the country, starting with 4 in Arizona. He was very close to killing one in Phoenix and another two in Sedona after he killed Pastor Bill. RIP. “He went as far having thorn crowns ready for their crucifixions.” 🧵2/3

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵3/3 Well imagine that. https://t.co/bgI0Q0hcsm

RichardEntuboca
Posted - June 26, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 2:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared details about Adam Sheafe, who recently murdered a Christian pastor in Tucson after being released from a lengthy prison term. I highlighted connections to various LLCs, including Avatar Management and Alpine Consulting, suggesting significant implications tied to figures like Michael Crow and agencies like the CIA and DHS. I also noted that my previous account was likely suspended due to discussing these topics. Sheafe's actions seem rooted in a disturbing ideology, as he expressed a belief that those who see Jesus as the son of God should face dire consequences.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

*ADAM SHEAFE* Murdered Christian pastor by crucifixion in Tucson, AZ, right after release from 94-month prison term. *Three potentially MASSIVE hits from @CagedLionPhilos. Huge props on the LLC finds. Let’s get confirmation on ties. 💥AVATAR MANAGEMENT LLC (Avatar Holdings Inc - Scottsdale, AZ) 💥ALPINE CONSULTING LLC (ERIC Voter Registration System Contractor - “Alpine Consulting Partners LLC”) 💥AVIATOR MANAGEMENT LLC (DigitalBridge Subsidiary - Aviator Holdings) @TrueNorth444, @Theonlyme333, you’ll both probably recognize that last one instantly. — Switch Data Centers🤣

@CagedLionPhilos - The Philosophy of a Caged Lion

@RichardEntuboca Holy shitballz get a load of this. 145 Entities.

@CagedLionPhilos - The Philosophy of a Caged Lion

🔻 ADAM SHEAFE (AZ) ✅️ CYBERNET VENTURES LLC ✅️ CYBERNET GROUP LLC

@CagedLionPhilos - The Philosophy of a Caged Lion

🔻 ADAM SHEAFE (AZ) ✅️ CYBERNET VENTURES LLC ✅️ CYBERNET GROUP LLC

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

More of those receipts.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Here’s the ERIC/Alpine Consulting Partners LLC receipts. Potentially big stuff right here, sports fans. Real big.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Hey, there’s already direct ties back to Michael Crow, IQT (CIA), DHS and ARIZONA. PS: I’m PRETTY SURE… THIS is exactly the shit that cost me my @DecentFiJC account way back in February of 2024, when it had ~65k followers and I was getting 15mm engagements/week.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

@DecentFiJC *Adam Sheafe* Bank fraud. Vicious religious-based murder.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Adam Sheafe, eh? He’s the one who just brutally murdered (crucified) that Christian pastor in Tucson, AZ? Gosh, he must’ve JUST gotten out of prison after serving his 94-month sentence for his role in Bank fraud and identity theft. Classic Jews. I wonder who activated him.😒 https://www.justice.gov/usao-az/pr/tucson-resident-sentenced-94-months-prison-role-bank-fraud-scheme

Tucson Resident Sentenced to 94 Months in Prison for Role in Bank Fraud Scheme justice.gov

@zadokq244514 - Zadok 💫

What do you notice? Adam Sheafe confessed to killing a New River, AZ pastor by crucifying him and also put a crown of thorns on his head. The suspect, Adam Sheafe, said he planned to "execute" and "crucify" a total of 14 priests in 10 states across the country… #BreakingNews

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

@DecentFiJC *Adam Sheafe* This seems fine.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🚨 Adam Sheafe (see jewish neck tattoo) has confessed to crucifying Arizona pastor ✝️ Bill Schonemann. “It’s a commandment to rid Israel of evil” He believes anyone who says Jesus is the son of God deserves to die. But this was part of a much bigger plan. 🧵1/3 🗣️interview by @BrianaWhitney

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker admits to murdering Pastor Bill for breaking the first commandment, stating he crucified him against a wall in the image of Jesus. He expresses no remorse, believing he is punishing false teachings that destroy families. He had a hit list of 14 pastors around the nation, starting in Arizona, and was caught in Sedona while targeting two more priests. He had made leather tags and crowns of thorns for the planned crucifixions. After a high-speed chase, he escaped police but returned to target the priests. His list included locations such as Las Vegas, Portland, and New York. He believes God will forgive his sins because he is ridding the earth of evil, following God's command to execute those who preach false gods. He acknowledges most people view his actions as insane but believes reality will prove him right. He admits God didn't tell him to murder pastors, but he did it on his own.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you had no previous contact with pastor Bill? Speaker 1: Zero. I didn't want any any any any previous contact. My my only criteria was you're breaking the first commandment. Speaker 0: But pastor Bill was Innocent? Speaker 1: In your perspective, if I there's nothing worse But not yours. But there's nothing worse than breaking the first commandment. I drove from there to Phil's house, like, two in the morning on a Sunday night, and I executed him. It's fast. I mean, it's you know, I I just I I I didn't want it I didn't want it to be bloody. I didn't want it to be a painful I'm not trying to torture the guy. I just wanted to execute him quickly. Put him in a cross position on the wall, and I screwed him to the wall. And then I had a crown of thorns I put on his head. So he's he's crucified against the wall with the, you know, in the image of Jesus. Because what I'm saying is, you know, what you're preaching is not what God said. It's the opposite of what God said. Speaker 0: Most people that would come into that scene, Bill's murder scene would be horrified. Horrified. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: Were you feeling satisfied? Speaker 1: I wasn't you know, I mean, look, I'm not it's not in my heart to go around killing people. Speaker 0: You also have a family. Bill has a family. Mhmm. Did you think about that at all? Speaker 1: No. I'm thinking about the families that are in utter destruction, you know, by by following these false teachings and not obeying God and not giving our creator the respect for giving families life to begin with. Speaker 0: How would you feel though if somebody crucified you? Good luck trying. Do you think you're a monster? Speaker 1: Do I think I'm a monster? No. Speaker 0: It's a gruesome killing of another person. Most people would consider that monstrous. Speaker 1: Sure. Of course think you are. No. I see myself as more of a like a saint. Speaker 0: So when did this plan come to fruition? You're you're thinking about this. You wanna carry out this hit list? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: A hit list. Sure. 14 pastors. Speaker 1: That's right. Around the nation. To surround the nation. Speaker 0: Starting in Arizona? Speaker 1: Starting in Arizona where I was born. Where it starts is where it ends, like the Garden Of Eden. I start in Phoenix where I was born on this life, and I'm gonna end in Phoenix where I was baptized, which I don't appreciate when I was three years old by my parents. You know, I'm baptized in a belief that it's completely false. Speaker 0: So you get to Phoenix. Speaker 1: I get to Phoenix. I I I just set up a tent under a tree on Olive Street, and I followed that priest home Sunday after Easter's service. And when he pulled into his driveway, the two women came out of the garage. I'm not interested in executing anyone other than the pastors or the shepherds leading the flock astray. I need to find pastors or priests that live alone. Speaker 0: If you had gotten away with Bill's murder, where were you gonna go next? Speaker 1: That's where I got caught was In Yeah. In Sedona. I had both of the leather tags made out, both of the thorn crowns. Yeah. Where'd you get a thorn crown? In the desert. You know, the trees with the thorns on them. I cut it and make a crown of thorns. I just in a circle, you know? So I had both of those priests in my target. I was in route of getting into the back of the car of the second priest and an old lady got in front of me. I had lost my vehicle because I got a high speed chase with the police and the stolen truck in Sedona. I escaped. I ran up a mountain. I got away from all the cops. I hiked all the way back to my tent, and I was still, you know, on target for those two priests. But I wanted my target so bad that I I refused to leave, so I hiked all the way back. Had I had a vehicle, those two were were were done. They didn't have a chance in hell. From there was Las Vegas, Nevada Portland, Oregon Seattle, Washington Billings, Montana Detroit, Michigan New York, New York Charlotte, North Carolina Mobile, Alabama Beaumont, Texas and El Paso, Texas. So four of them are gonna get hit in Arizona. Speaker 0: So you have zero remorse for this kill? Not only Speaker 1: do I have zero remorse, I plan on fulfilling what I started. If my father puts me in an authoritative position on this earth, I will execute every single priest and burn every church to the the ground. Speaker 0: I mean, it's likely you'll be imprisoned for the rest of your life. Speaker 1: That's what you think. I want the death penalty because I wanna show you, you can't kill God's son. That whole story is b s. Speaker 0: So if you're given the death penalty, it's not likely you'll be executed quickly. Speaker 1: Well, I want it quickly so that we can get this show on the road and show exactly what I'm trying to do. All you gotta do is just worship Jesus and you go to heaven. Your your sins are all forgiven. That's not what god said. But do you Speaker 0: think god was going to forgive your sins? Speaker 1: Absolutely. He'll forgive my sins. He forgives he's a forgiving God. He's a living God. Speaker 0: How do you justify that? I mean, you're killing somebody or multiple people attempted. Speaker 1: Okay. But it's a commandment to to to to rid Israel of evil. I have a plan to rid this earth of evil. Speaker 0: You do realize most people look at this and think this is this is insane. Speaker 1: Good. And I'm glad they think that. But when reality strikes, it'll strike hard. From your perspective, that's murder, thou shall not kill. That is one of the 10 commandments. Mhmm. But also, god commands that if anybody is to preach that anyone other than him is god, we are to stone them to death or we are to execute them. And so I'm following that law. Speaker 0: You've interpreted this how you Speaker 1: interpret it. And that's how God that that that's the way God commanded it. Speaker 0: I I don't think I don't think God said, go go murder pastors. He just didn't. Speaker 1: He didn't tell me to do that. Absolutely not. I did that on my own.
BasedSamParker
Posted - June 18, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Saved - June 18, 2025 at 11:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reza Pahlavi believes the current regime in Iran must be overthrown, envisioning a bright future for the country. There's a discussion about historical figures like JFK and their bloodlines, suggesting a pattern of conquest over Gentile families by a global Jewish empire through intermarriage and political influence. This narrative extends to various political figures and families, implying a systematic removal of rival powers. The posts also touch on controversial topics like race-mixing and immigration policies, framing them within a broader conspiracy.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Reza Pahlavi, the heir to the overthrown Shah of Iran, says the current ruling regime in Iran has to be overthrown as well. Here's him & his daughter. Who do you think will end up running Iran if he gets his way?

@PahlaviReza - Reza Pahlavi

The Islamic Republic has come to its end and is collapsing. What has begun is irreversible. The future is bright, and together we will turn the page of history. Now is the time to stand up; the time to reclaim Iran. May I be with you soon.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ There's a larger pattern going on here. Ex: JFK--they may have k*lled JFK, but they actually conquered him when they took over his bloodline.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ JFK's Gentile bloodline was tragically ended in a mysterious & suspicious airplane "accident," leaving him only the jеwish line, now.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/Everyone already knows about Ivanka & Jared Kushner. Weird thing that Donald Trump said, too, don't you think? Do you think they will try to get Barron, too?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Let's look at the infamous Hunter Biden. Just 10 days after they met? What is this?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ But it's not just Hunter, they got ALL of Joe Biden's heirs--and Kamala, too!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ AND Chelsea Clinton, the heir of the Clinton Crime Family

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Let's hop across the pond to the UK: Prime Minister Keir Starmer's wife Victoria and their children--

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ Back to the Kennedy family. Remember RFK Jr's running mate, Nicole Shanahan? 3 husbands:

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ Quick ad break: Twitter demonetized me & stripped my paid subscribers, so if you'd like to support my work, I have buymeacoffee, CashApp, Venmo, PayPal & crypto: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

11/ Let's jump back into the Media: Newscorp titan Rupert Murdoch--the guy who owns Fox News, the most pro-israel TV station on he planet outside of israel. Here's his current wife, Elena Zhukova.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

12/ Geert Wilders, prominent Dutch politician & aspirant to Prime Minister, and his wife:

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

13/ So What's Actually Going On: Worldwide jewry operates like an empire--a nation/kingdom without borders, which conquers & occupies Gentile "kingdoms" & dynasties that it sees as rivals. These kingdoms can be actual nations & countries with borders (like the United States, which it occupies through money & political power; or Palestine, which it occupies by military force); or "kingdoms" of powerful Gentile families & dynasties (which can be thought of as "Royalty," "nobility," or "aristocracy"). Through intermarriage, the global jеwish empire subsumes rich & powerful Gentile families, folding them into their jеwish kingdom. Jewish engineering of wars has also overthrown other competing monarchies & royal families, ex: remember the Bolsheviks who overthrew imperial Russia & the Tsar? Through "royal intermarriage," they accomplish 2 things: 1. They increase the wealth, power & prestige of the worldwide jеwish empire. 2. They remove rival Gentile kingdoms & dynasties from the playing board which might become rich or powerful enough to challenge worldwide jewish hegemony, or operate independently of jewish power. The jеws conquered the world a long time ago, and they like to keep it that way.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

14/ Ad Break 2: Learn more about how the jews conquered the world & keep it that way. Buy & read this book from http://LucasGage.com, now. And follow @LucasGageX

lucasgage.com lucasgage.com

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX 15/ While jews are conquering the "Royal" Gentile bloodlines, they want the bloodlines of the rest of their main rival White Gentiles to be ended. Research the Kalergi Plan. https://t.co/KxlBQC865s

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX 16/ While we watch the "Neocons" take us to war with Iran: did you know that Neocon Founding Father Norman Podhoretz explicitly called for race-mixing between Whites & Blacks to solve the "Negro Problem" in the a US? https://t.co/cThBrjeGBB

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX 17/ At the same time Norman Podhoretz was advocating race-mixing, his fellow jеws were getting laws against interracial marriage struck down. https://t.co/NYoE91efcO

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX 18/ At the same time Norman was pushing race-mixing & jеwish lawyers were getting laws against interracial marriage struck down, other jews were getting America's borders opened to a flood of non-Whites from around the world. Bookmark this thread: https://t.co/Mc6nX6mgo6

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Emanuel Celler also sponsored the 1965 Hart-Celler Immigration & Naturalization Act of 1965 that abolished the National Origins quota system & opened America to the 3rd World & non-White immigration. https://t.co/Uh58Hmwxhi

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX 19/ Hope you enjoyed this thread! Please consider supporting my time & work. I have buymeacoffee, CashApp, Venmo, PayPal & crypto. Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LucasGageX @TruthArchiveAI save thread

SamParkerSenate
Posted - November 10, 2020 at 5:00 AM
Saved - June 7, 2025 at 7:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed how the 17th Amendment dismantled bicameralism, a key principle of our founding, leading to the Federal Government being influenced by a small group of elites. Before the amendment, the Senate, controlled by state legislatures, acted as a check on the House, limiting collusion and maintaining state sovereignty. Now, with both houses easily swayed by money, the power dynamics have shifted, leaving states with diminished influence. This erosion of external checks has allowed the Federal Government to grow unchecked, undermining the original intent of the Constitution.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

1. *Thread* A short explanation of "Bicameralism"--one of our founding governing principals DESTROYED by the 17th Amendment. Its elimination was a major factor in enabling the Federal Gov to be captured by a small group of powerful & rich forces, i.e. the "Ruling Elites." https://t.co/jEhqPucJH9

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

*The 17th amendment made the senate not have reason to exist.

@Sen_JoeManchin - Senator Joe Manchin

Let me be clear: I will not vote to pack the courts & I will not vote to end the filibuster. The U.S. Senate is the most deliberative body in the world. It was made so that we work together in a bipartisan way. If you get rid of the filibuster, there's no reason to have a Senate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
If both Georgia senators are elected from the Democratic party, the Senate will be split 50-50, with Vice President Harris holding the tie-breaking vote. However, one senator could prevent a tie by not voting on the Democratic side. The speaker commits to viewers that they will not vote to pack the courts or end the filibuster. The Senate is a unique body made to work together in a bipartisan way, and breaking down those barriers would be detrimental. The speaker also states that they are not for defunding the police, and they believe that Medicare for all is not feasible. They advocate for fixing the Affordable Care Act and working with moderate Republicans to repair what needs to be repaired.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, a lot of focus now on those Georgia runoffs, and potentially, if it all adds up, Tom Tillis wins in North Carolina, Dan Sullivan in Alaska. It looks like those two races could be the control of the US senate with a tie then going to vice president Harris. What do you tell people about that and concern about that consider considering all we've heard about the progressive agenda? Well, there's a lot Speaker 1: of people that are concerned. There's a lot of fear tactics are being used right now, Brett. If both of the Georgia, senators were elected from the Democratic party, then that would be fifty fifty if both Dan Sullivan and Tom Tillis win. Fifty fifty means there's a tie. But if one senator does not vote on a democratic side, there is no tie and there is no bill. So I commit to you tonight and I commit to all of your viewers and everyone else that's watching. I wanna lay those fears. I wanna rest those fears for you right now because when they talk about whether it be packing the courts or ending the filibuster, I will not vote to do that. I will not vote to pack the courts, I think, and I will not vote to end the filibuster. Brett, this system, the senate was so unique body in the world. It was made to work together in a bipartisan way. And once you start breaking down those barriers, then you lose every every reason that we are the institution that we are, the most deliberate body. So I wanna lay those fears to rest that that won't happen because I will not be the fiftieth democrat voting to end that, filibuster or to basically, block stack the court. And then all the other things you're hearing about, Brett, also is defund the police. Don't know if any of the democrats in the caucus that are for defunding the police. We're not for that whatsoever. And when they talk about basically, Medicare for all, we can't even pay for Medicare for some. Doesn't make any sense at all. We've got to fix the Affordable Care Act we have, and I think our Republican moderate Republicans will work with us to now repair what needs to be repaired.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

2. Prior to passage of the 17th amendment, it was hard to wrangle consensus between the Senate & House. This depressed the value of House seats b/c whatever fervor whipped up in the House would/could often be quelled by the Senate--then under the control of state legislature.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

3. This difference in "constituencies," (the people vs. the States) limited the scope of potential law/policy making. It prevented/minimized "log-rolling," i.e. quid-pro-quo governing/voting. Collusion. Very expensive & hard to curry favor of both The People & State Legislatures.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

4. Once the Senate was put under the control of the people, though, these checks on the Fed Gov were removed. Now, both houses could much more easily collude & be captured by the monied, powerful elites. This greatly expanded the scope of the gov to whatever they wanted. https://t.co/xvCTK2Rfcz

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

5. B/c both houses could more easily come under 1 set of forces, it ignited a bidding war on House & Senate seats. The value of both seats skyrocketed, & put the congress firmly under the control of the Ruling Elites. Now, congress is only responsive to the Elites. No Check. https://t.co/TWmo0SUMuk

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

6. Furthermore, the Reapportionment Act of 1929 permanently froze the size of the House at 435, rather than letting it scale up as mandated by the Constitution. As a result, the power of each scarce seat has grown along w/its value. It's our of reach of "The People."

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

7. Now, over 90% of all races are won by the better funded candidate. This ensures that the Senate & House are both firmly under the control of a single constituency--which is neither "The People" or "The States." Yes, you get to vote, but only on those chosen by the Elites. https://t.co/4tGPPVPcYR

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

8. Here's just 1 of a legion of examples: Seorge Goros has outright bought dozens of elected officials across many levels of gov. Look how many DAs he controls around the country. How many do you control w/your single vote? 🤔 🤣 https://t.co/wtmKkmAvaq

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

9. Here's a picture of the wealthiest person/family in each state. Together, these 50 people/families have as much or more political power probably than any 10s of millions of citizens. And the only real check on their power is another person/group w/a sh*tload of money & power. https://t.co/oqWOSYpqQm

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

10. The Framers' primary concern in creating the Constitution was to protect our inherent God-given, natural rights by restraining tyranny & tyrants from infringing upon or destroying them. The 17th amendment & its BICAMERALISM was 1 of the many checks they created to this end.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

11. Besides destroying Bicameralism, the 17th A also removed the states as a sovereign group from their seat at the Fed Gov table. Look at all the powers the State Legislatures were meant to have power/influence over--but over which they now have little to none: i.e. EVERYTHING. https://t.co/l8i5KmDWhe

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

12. The states, as a whole, were a massive counterbalance to the power of the Fed Gov. Through their control over the Senate, they had a collective hand on the reins of gov & were essentially equal in governing power w/the Fed Gov. W/the 17th A, they lost their "equality."

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

13. W/the loss of State Sovereignty Equality, the Fed Gov became untethered from the principal EXTERNAL check on its power--the States. Now, the reserved powers of the states are extremely limited & include no checks over the Fed Gov. NO CHECKS OVER THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

14. Compare the current reserved powers of the states to the powers of the US Congress--which the states were always supposed to have influence/power over through the Senate (#11 in this thread above): https://t.co/R8hYJJseue

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

15. Why are External Controls so important? B/C the United States was created as a *compound republic.* The POWER was 1st divided between 2 "distinct governments": the States & the Federal w/INTERNAL & EXTERNAL controls placed on the Federal. The states were the EXTERNAL Check. https://t.co/XSE963RSdZ

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

16. These EXTERNAL controls included the State Legislatures having control over the Senate in a Federal BICAMERAL legislature. The INTERNAL controls are famous & well-known: "Checks & Balances" and "Separation of Powers." See below. https://t.co/r71RrwH77r

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

17. No matter how the power is distributed w/in the Fed Gov, though--there's still no EXTERNAL control. IOW, there's nothing external that theoretically restrains its power. The states were supposed to be this external power, but the 17th A destroyed our *Compound* Republic.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

18. An unfortunate byproduct of removing states' representation from the Fed Gov is that the 10th Amendment was de-fanged. The states no longer control a lever of power w/which to jealously guard their powers & rights--nor their citizens' powers & rights.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

19. To keep this thread brief, here's an article in which I discuss the ways, powers & methods the Framers gave us to enforce & empower the 10th amendment & limit the power of the Fed Gov. https://delegatedigest.org/2018/05/31/giving-teeth-to-the-10th-amendment/

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

20. The Electoral College was also powerful check on the power of the FedGov & the seizing of that power by tyranny. Unfortunately, it was 1 of the 1st firewalls to be breached. Here's a thread on the original intent of the EC. Much of it isn't well known: https://t.co/ADpprKTbrT

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

Thread: Electoral College 1. Relatively speaking, almost no one knows the full theory & history behind the EC. In this thread, we will review the EC: -The original reasons for its conception, & -How, if restored, it could mitigate many of the problems we experience today. https://t.co/MQxn0vRpyK

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

21. So, what effect have the 17th Amendment, the freezing of the House at 435, & various other changes had on the size, power & scope of the Fed Gov? Here's one look: It's exploded in size & power to relieve us of our wealth. 👇 https://t.co/5AtlpaK23C

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

@threadreaderapp unroll

BasedSamParker
Posted - June 6, 2025 at 3:09 AM
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 6:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today marks the anniversary of RFK's assassination and Israel's attack on Egypt, events I believe are interconnected. I argue that both RFK and JFK were victims of a larger conspiracy, with Frank Mankiewicz, RFK's press secretary, playing a pivotal role in misleading the public. His involvement in media manipulation extends to the Watergate scandal and the film "JFK," which I contend obscures Israel's role in these assassinations. I explore how narratives around RFK's death were shaped by political figures like LA Mayor Sam Yorty, suggesting a deeper plot at play.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Today, June 5th, is the day RFK was shot (1968) & the day israel launched its sneak attack on Egypt, starting the 6-Day War (1967). The 2 events are connected, as we'll see in this thread. The RFK assassination is also connected to the JFK assassination, but the same people behind the 2 assassinations have gone to great lengths to hide this fact. They don't want you associating what are clearly serial murders by the same killer. They want you thinking both assassinations were perpetrated by lone gunmen for unrelated reasons. We all know the conventional JFK narrative: the assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was a disaffected communist radical lone gunman. The conventional RFK narrative is similar & goes something like this: the assassin was a disaffected Palestinian radical lone gunman named Sirhan Sirhan hated RFK because he supported israel. Sirhan resolved to assassinate RFK on or before the anniversary of the 6-Day War as revenge for RFK's support of israel. Sirhan went to the Ambassador Hotel during the California Primary on June 4th, 1968, and waited in the kitchen, whereupon he opened fire on RFK after the night's victory celebration. And thus Arab/Middle East terrorism in America was born. There's just one problem: Sirhan couldn't have killed RFK, for several reasons which are easily looked up. Even RFK Jr. knows this narrative is bullshit and that Sirhan was a patsy (see below)--which means that everything we're told to reinforce the conventional narrative is also bullshit. This thread will explore the real plot & colluders who helped lead us down the wrong path. This thread assumes you know that the jеws were the masterminds behind the JFK assassination. We start with Frank Mankiewicz, RFK's press secretary, whom an eye-witness testifies guided RFK to the kitchen where Sirhan was waiting, instead of the ballroom as originally planned. Her testimony is confirmed by literal video evidence (see below). Mankiewicz was a jеwish member of the Anti-Defamation League of the B'nai B'rith, aka the ADL. Watch:

Video Transcript AI Summary
After his victory speech, Bobby Kennedy was to be led to a mariachi band. Dolores Huerta states her job was to take the senator to the ballroom where the band was waiting. According to the transcript, Frank Mankowitz, described as an anti-defamation league spy operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad who infiltrated Kennedy's campaign as his press secretary, turned RFK toward the kitchen pantry where assassins waited. Huerta says that as they left the podium, they directed the senator to the kitchen, and she was unable to catch up with him. The transcript claims Mankowitz blocked Kennedy's path and ensured he couldn't escape the gunmen. According to the transcript, Sirhan Sirhan fired two shots at Kennedy from five feet away. One shot hit Paul Schrad, and the other went past Kennedy's ear and hit a door jam. The transcript states the autopsy report made it clear that Sirhan could not have killed Kennedy, a conclusion Thomas Noguchi, the coroner, also reached.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we got to the podium, I thought where's his security? There's no security. He just had he just let me security. There was one person. Speaker 1: I thank all of you. And Dolores Huerta, who is an old friend of mine and has worked the union. My thanks to all of you, and now it's on to Chicago and let's win there. Speaker 2: After Kennedy's victory speech, Dolores Huerta had been officially assigned to lead him off the stage to his right, which is to the left if you're facing the stage, in order to walk through the crowded ballroom and meet up with a mariachi band. Speaker 0: The plan was that after he spoke, my job was to take the senator over to the ballroom. We had a mariachi band that was waiting there for him. Speaker 2: After his speech, Bobby Kennedy turns right and begins heading toward the mariachi band as planned. However, Frank Mankowitz, an anti defamation league spy operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad, had infiltrated Bobby Kennedy's campaign under the cover of being his press secretary. Mankiewicz turns RFK around and points him into the kitchen pantry where a team of assassins waited to ambush and shoot Kennedy. Speaker 0: But as we left the podium, they said, senator, come to the kitchen. And then one of our staff, they caught my arm and say, Dolores, what happened? You're supposed to be taking him to the bottom. I said I'm I said, they're taking him to the kitchen. And then I couldn't catch up with the senator after that. Speaker 2: Let's watch it again in slow motion. Kennedy turns to his right, our left as we face the stage, and begins walking toward the mariachi band. He encounters ADL and Israeli Mossad assassination coordinator Frank Mankowitz. Mankowitz spins Bobby around by pointing him directly toward the ambush in the kitchen. Mankowitz blocks Bobby's path and moves forward toward Kennedy to ensure RFK can't escape from the gunmen waiting in the kitchen. A hotel maitre d' named Karl Euker was used as a pawn to grab Bobby's arm and lead him into the ambush. Mankiewicz made sure no real security was available to guard Bobby. Speaker 3: When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father, which is what Thomas Noguchi, the coroner, the most important coroner probably in American history, concluded also and said in his autobiography. And here's the here's what happened, the short story. Sirhan fired two shots at my father. He was five feet away. There was, as I said, many, many there was absolute mayhem in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel. My father just won the primary. He said from the stage, and now it's on to Chicago, which is where the convention was. Then he walks off the stage, and he went into a route that was not expected. He was led into a route through the kitchen, which he was not supposed to go to. And waiting in the kitchen, in an ambush, was Sirhan Sirhan, neck standing in front of a steam table. And as my father approached the steam table, Surhan fired at him. Two shots. One of those hit Paul Schrad. The other one went past my father's ear and hit a door jam behind my father, a wooden door jam, from which it was later removed by the LAPD.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ After having led RFK to his death in the kitchen on June 5th, Frank Mankiewicz famously delivers the news of RFK's death to the world on June 6th, 1968. Look how convincingly he sells the deception of his involvement. https://t.co/gWdJTUTKRg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Robert Francis Kennedy died at 1:44 AM on June 6, 1968. He was 42 years old. Present at the time of his death were his wife Ethel, his sisters Mrs. Stephen Smith and Mrs. Patricia Lawford, his brother-in-law Mr. Stephen Smith, and his sister-in-law Mrs. John F. Kennedy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Robert Francis Kennedy died at 01:44AM today, 06/06/1968, with senator Kennedy at the time of his death were his wife Ethel, his sisters Mrs. Stephen Smith, Mrs. Patricia Lawford, brother-in-law Mr. Stephen Smith, and his sister-in-law Mrs. John F. Kennedy. He was 42 years old.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ But Frank Mankiewicz was just getting started in helping sell jеwish psyops & deceptions. He wrote 3 books chronicling Nixon's Watergate guilt: https://t.co/wWAsUBxYFY

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Oh, you didn't know that Watergate was an engineered plot to oust Nixon? Listen to Tucker Carlson outline the plot & connect it to the JFK assassination. Note: Tucker leaves out that Bob Woodward's partner was Carl Bernstein (✡️) & that the Washington Post, which led the anti-Nixon charge in the press, was owned & run by the Graham family (✡️).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA with help from Bob Woodward, a Washington Post reporter who had been a naval intelligence officer in the Nixon White House. Woodward, whose main source for Watergate was the number two guy at the FBI, was a tool of secret power used to remove Nixon, the most popular president in American history, from office. Nixon was replaced by Gerald Ford, who sat on the Warren Commission and became vice president because Carl Albert, the Democrat speaker of the house, insisted. The people who broke into the Watergate office building were mostly CIA employees. Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in history in 1972, but was undone two years later by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI, and CIA employees.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at what happened to Richard Nixon, which I, of course, did not understand at all. Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA. And with the help of Bob Bob Woodward, who was a Washington Post reporter who had been a naval intelligence officer working in the White House, working in the Nixon White House. And then he shows up, like, a year later, and he's this brand new reporter. He'd never been a journalist at all. He's a naval intel officer. The famous Bob Woodward, we all revere, and he's at the Washington Post. And somehow he gets the biggest story in the history of the Washington Post. He's the lead guy in that story. Well, I I worked at a newspaper. I've been in the news business my whole life. That is not how it works. You don't take a kid like his first day from a totally unrelated business and put him on the biggest story. But he was. He was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup. What else how would you describe that? If that happened in Guatemala, what would you say? And yet the way it was framed and the way that I accepted for decades was, oh, this intrepid reporter fought power. No. No. No. This intrepid reporter, Bob Woodward, was a tool of power, secret power, which is the most threatening kind, to bounce the single most popular president in American history, Richard Nixon, from office before the end of his term and replace him with who? Oh, Gerald Ford, who sat on the Warren Commission. Now how did Gerald Ford get to be Richard Nixon's vice president? Well, because Carl Albert, the Democrat speaker of the house, told him you must choose him. We will only confirm him when they sent the actual elected vice president away for tax evasion, Spiro Agnew of Maryland. So you have a complete setup like an abs Joe Ford, the only unelected president in American history, actually sat on the Warren Commission. Something else that I accepted at face value until I looked at it, I was like, that's completely insane. You didn't wanna interview Jack Ruby in your investigation of the of the assassination? Okay. You're fake. Yeah. He was on the Warren Commission. And so sorry for the long story, but the point is, like, that that happened in front of all of us, but the way it was framed cloaked to the obvious reality of it. The people who broke into the Watergate Office building from which the name is taken, Watergate, I think it was six of them or seven of them. All but one was a CI employee. That that's real. It's like look it up on Google. So the whole thing, Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the nineteen seventy two election. He was the most popular by votes, which is the only way we can really measure popularity, the most popular president in his reelection campaign. And two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI, and a bunch of CIA employees. You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts. That's not crackpot shit.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Why did the jеws oust Nixon? The White House tapes capture the reasons: he was aware of the jеwish infiltration of the government & other institutions that had happened leading up to and subsequent to the JFK assassination, and had resolved to do something about it. https://t.co/a5JfNIWJfx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 believes "they" don't share the same beliefs "as we believe in" and dislike things like "reader's diagette," preferring "pornographic stuff." Speaker 1 mentions being invited to lunch with Time magazine editors, a first since Henry Luce. Speaker 0 says "they" control the media, unrelated to antisemitism. Speaker 1 agrees "they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff." Speaker 1 references the Bible's distinction between "the synagogue of Satan" and "the remnant of God's people," claiming the former are energized by supernatural power. Speaker 1 believes "they" possess a "strange brilliance" and recalls Hitler's time, stating "they" had a "stranglehold" on Germany's banking, media, and everything else. Speaker 1 asserts this "stranglehold" must be broken to save the country. Speaker 0 agrees but feels unable to say it. Speaker 1 suggests a second term could enable action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if they get in, they're gonna turn the country that way. They don't believe that they as we believe in. They did that kind of thing with smart hands carny. They reviewed. That's right. They don't believe in that, sir. They don't they and also, they don't believe in such things as the reader's diagette. No. They think it's corny. They like that pornographic stuff that appears in the light or not, which I hope goes down the drain and continues the kind Speaker 1: of By the way, Hedley Donovan has just invited me to have lunch with all their editors here on March 7 and I was quite amazed because this is the first time I've heard from Time magazine since Henry Luce Is that right? I don't know any of them now. Speaker 0: They're everything because he took the whole thing off. And it has nothing to do with the antisemitism. It happens so that insofar as the media is concerned, the power of the media. They've got it. They've got it right by Speaker 1: And they're the ones putting out the pornographic stuff and putting out everything. Speaker 0: I don't know why they do it. You see Speaker 1: the bible makes a distinction, Mr. President, between two groups of Jews. One is called the synagogue of Satan. Different kinds. There's those people in the latter days it's called the remnant of God's people, which will be Jewish people. And then there's the synagogue of Satan. Nearly all of your religious deceptions in the latter days, what the Bible speaks, latter days can be a thousand years, what they call the synagogue of Satan. In other words, they are energized by supernatural power called the devil. This is what the Bible teaches whether you believe it or don't believe it. This is the biblical teaching. This is what I believe. And I believe that you have, they have a strange brilliance about them. They have a They're And they are energized in my judgment by supernatural power. Well also they do something else, but they're not only smart. And you see, of course Hitler didn't, they had a stranglehold on Germany, on the banking of Germany, on everything in Germany and the media. They had the whole thing you see. But he went about it wrong. But but this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is gonna go down to drain. You believe that? Yes, sir. Oh, boy. I can't ever Speaker 0: say it, but I believe it. No. But if Speaker 1: you've ever elected the second time, you might be able to do something. Let me turn to sun

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Circling back to Frank Mankiewicz, he wrote another book about how television is used to manipulate & propagandize the American people. I took a look at the book, and he doesn't divulge how he used television to manipulate the American people regarding the RFK assassination. Lol We will see just how adept he was at mass media propaganda and manipulation.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7. Frank went on to head National Public Radio, NPR, for 6 years. During his tenure, he increased that propaganda operation to 281 stations and tripled the listenership. https://t.co/4aYQbjCT7t

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ But Frank's "magnum opus" was his PR work for the film "JFK," surely one of the greatest propaganda efforts ever committed to celluloid. The movie was written, produced & directed by jеws--and blames the CIA & military industrial complex for the JFK assassination. Not one word about israel, Mossad or nukes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. By 1961, some knew Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisors from Vietnam, angering some who felt betrayed after Laos. Kennedy questioned why the US should go into Vietnam if Cuba was too close, leading to conflict. Defense spending was escalating, with projections of nearly $200 billion spent since the war began. The Kennedy brothers allegedly targeted voting districts with defense contracts to influence the '64 election. Some wanted to control intelligence from Saigon and manage McNamara's influence on Kennedy. The plan may have started with conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and military officers. The goal was to create a plan, likely in the South, with no direct orders or written evidence, ensuring plausible deniability. The operation had to succeed, regardless of the cost, with perpetrators protected from prosecution. This was described as a coup d'etat.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ In "JFK: The Documented Screenplay," Frank Mankiewicz vigorously defends the film against its vicious attacks in the press, led by the jewish New York Times. This is kosher theater of the highest order, a real kosher sandwich--designed to elevate the film. The public was herded into one of two camps: Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, or the CIA/MIC conspiracy did it. No room for israel in this artificial dialectic.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ Before I continue, if you'd like to support my work--or you find it of value--I have buymeacoffee, CashApp, Venmo, PayPal & crypto. Twitter demonetized me, so I'm not being compensated for this work except by your generosity. Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

11/ Let's stay on "JFK," and shift our focus to its producer, Arnon Milchan--who, it turns out--was an israeli spy & nuclear weapons trafficker since the 1960s, critical to helping israel build its nuclear program. https://t.co/uwsBpJQGTm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 recalls asking someone, presumably a friend, about something. The friend responded that he was Israeli and would do certain things for his country. Speaker 0 notes that this got the person into big trouble. Speaker 1 says he accepted the answer, almost.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know that the years that you were doing King of Comedy and Once Upon a Time in America were perhaps the most dramatic years for him Yes. In that respect. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Did you notice anything back then? Speaker 1: I did ask him once we spoke about something and he told me that he was an Israeli and that he and that he of course would do these things for his country. There's something with the little the little the things that trigger us I some point that I had asked Arnold about that. Being friends, I was curious but not in an accusatory way, just wanted know. And he he said, yeah. I'm I'm Israeli. That's my country. Know. Speaker 0: This got him into big trouble. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I and and he gave me that answer, and I and I accepted it. Almost. Almost. Yeah.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

12/ Finally, in December 2023, Oliver Stone admitted to the clash between JFK & israel regarding nuclear weapons. Why didn't he or Milchan address this in their "JFK" movie? 60 years late, Stone. https://t.co/2PvNdb6iH0

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Kennedy opposed Israel obtaining nuclear weapons and prevented it. He intended to make inspections very rigid, particularly concerning the Des Moines facility. After Kennedy's assassination, Lyndon Johnson allegedly allowed Israel to proceed, and the Des Moines facility opened in 1968. Johnson directed people not to discuss it, and some Americans are unaware that Israel possesses nuclear weapons illegally. Kennedy believed allowing Israel to have the bomb was wrong, but Johnson secretly aided Israel, despite them not helping the U.S. in the Middle East. Kennedy was against colonialism, viewing Israel as an apartheid state, and his opposition led to his assassination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you know that John Kennedy was very much opposed to Israel getting them bombed? He he nixed it. Absolutely nixed it. He did not. And he was coming over to make the inspections very rigid. And the the they were building the the factory, the at Des Moines. That was a big issue. Kennedy was killed. Lyndon Johnson signed off and let the Israelis do what they want. They opened the Des Moines facility in 1968. Americans didn't even know because Johnson put out a directive. He said, don't talk about it. So to this day, I mean, Americans, some of them don't even know that the that they they illegally have the nuclear bomb. So that complicates the whole issue. Jack Kennedy was right. He was the last president who made sense, really made sense. And he said, we don't give them the bomb. The bomb was was sacred. The sacred the first five countries that got it, that was that was done. It was a fait accompli. But all of a sudden to allow Israel to have a bomb, no. No way in hell. That was the beginning of it. And, he was killed. But, Johnson was, secretly abetting Israel and saying they're our allies and, they haven't helped us one iota in the Middle East. The world hates us. That's not the country I grew up in. It's not the country. We know the difference. We knew the difference between right and wrong. This is clear. But definitely there was malice, a forethought in getting rid of Kennedy. And because they saw the danger that he represented, the change that he would have brought to the world. He he was against colonialism, and in a sense, his colonialism in Israel is an apartheid state. It's brown people, who are being killed. It's a form of another colonialism.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

13/ But it's not just Oliver Stone & Arnon Milchan. There's been a concerted effort for years to pin the murder of RFK on the Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan. For example, multiple articles on the 40th anniversary in 2008 reinforced the conventional narrative. In these articles by jеwish journalists, Sirhan's assassination plot is claimed to establish Arab/Muslim terrorism, is likened to 9/11 (another fake flag! Lol), and again repeats the talking points about the 6-Day War & Sirhan's hatred of israel.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

14/ NEW CHARACTER ALERT: JERRY COHEN But where did these talking points come from? How were they originally established? All the way back on the day of RFK's death: June 6th, 1968. On the front page of the morning edition of the Los Angeles Times on June 6th--mere hours after RFK died--jеwish columnist Jerry Cohen announced to the world how Sirhan wanted to complete his anti-israel vendetta by the 1-year anniversary of the 6-Day War, and that RFK personified his "virulent anti-israel" hatred.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

15/ Let's take a closer look at Jerry Cohen: ▪️Was found dead in his home in early 1993 of an apparent suicide. ▪️Was once a journalist in New Orleans ▪️Covered the trial of Clay Shaw, the man investigated by Jim Garrison for involvement in the assassination of JFK--the very case and character upon which the film "JFK" was based! Just tell me that's not one hell of a COHENcidence.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

16/ Side-Bar: Jerry Cohen also covered the Charles Manson-Sharon Tate/La Bianca murders, helping set that narrative cover-up, which is only recently beginning to be revealed in Tom O'Neill's "CHAOS" (2019). https://t.co/lMFgOplUH9

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

17/ NEW CHARACTER: LA Mayor Sam Yorty Circling back to RFK, where did Jerry Cohen get his narrative talking points on Sirhan Sirhan? As you can see from the newspaper article from June 6th a few tweets above, he says he got the information from the mayor of Los Angeles, Sam Yorty. Additionally, on June 5th & 6th, 1968, Mayor Yorty appeared in multiple televised press conferences wherein he used illegally obtained, and unauthenticated evidence (that the police hadn't even processed yet) to proclaim that Sirhan was a radical leftist communist, and that he was committed to killing RFK by the 1-year anniversary of the beginning of the 6-Day War. Sam Yorty was a long-time political enemy of the Kennedy family, and even though he was a fellow Democrat, he endorsed Nixon rather than JFK in 1960. In 1968, when RFK was running, he was again a Nixon supporter. The communist angle on Sirhan was later proven false. And I think it's time we call bullshit on the whole thing.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

18/ But it turns out that Mayor Yorty was even more proximately and intimately involved in the RFK shooting. Yorty literally urged RFK to end his victory speech only a few short minutes before Frank Mankiewicz shepherded RFK into the kitchen to be shot by Sirhan. Was Yorty a co-conspirator? Is this a smoking gun? Watch carefully:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker thanks everyone present and acknowledges a message indicating the event has run long. They express gratitude and shift focus to Chicago, expressing a desire to win there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I thank all of you, those of you who are here. Mary Mary Yordie has just sent me a message that we've been here too long already. So my thanks to all of you, and now it's on to Chicago, and let's win there. Thank you.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

19/ As I've written extensively before, the Vietnam War was a jewish plot to benefit israel (another deflection in the movie "JFK" in which it was asserted that the war was for the benefit of MIC. Which is true. But it left out the part about MIC supplying israel). One of the main reasons RFK withdrew his endorsement from LBJ and launched his own campaign for POTUS was his strong feelings against the Vietnam War and plans to end it.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

20/ JFK THE DAY BEFORE THE ASSASSINATION: "There’s no reason for us to lose another man over there. Vietnam is not worth another American life." - 11/21/1963 JFK had drafted a national security memo (NSAM-263), dated October 11, 1963, calling for US withdrawal from Vietnam. LBJ replaced this memo with his own (NSAM-273) just 1 day after JFK's funeral, calling for a massive escalation in Vietnam. Another motive for israel's assassination of him.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

21/ As I've also reported previously, one of the main motives behind the MLK Jr. assassination was *HIS* opposition to the Vietnam War. MLK gave his famous speech announcing his formal opposition to the war on April 4th, 1967. He was assassinated exactly one year later on April 4th, 1968. Reminiscent of RFK getting assassinated on the 1-year anniversary of the launch of the 6-Day War, no? Notice who came out against MLK for his anti-war stance: ▪️NAACP (✡️) ▪️New York Times (✡️) ▪️Washington Post (✡️) ▪️Ralph Bunche, winner of the 1950 Nobel Peace Prize for helping negotiate the settlement between Israel & the Arabs--done so mostly while shooting pool with israeli IDF Commander Moshe Dayan! Try not to notice that the MLK Jr. assassination also hinged on a lone gunman patsy who was also set up. Are you noticing the patterns, yet?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

22/ Here's RFK's impromptu MLK reaction speech on April 4th, 1968, just hours after the assassination of MLK Jr. Almost exactly 2 months later, RFK would be shot, too. https://t.co/3oD32PLuXm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Martin Luther King was shot and killed in Memphis. King dedicated his life to love and justice. The speaker asks what kind of nation the U.S. is and what direction it wants to move in. Black people may feel bitterness, hatred, and a desire for revenge, potentially leading to greater polarization. Alternatively, the country can follow King's example by understanding and replacing violence with compassion and love. The speaker says they can feel the same kind of hatred, as a member of their family was killed by a white man. The U.S. needs to move beyond these difficult times and seek love, wisdom, and compassion, not division, hatred, violence, or lawlessness. The speaker quotes Aeschylus, saying that even in despair, wisdom comes through the grace of God. The vast majority of people want to live together, improve life, and achieve justice. The speaker urges dedication to taming the savageness of man and prays for the country and its people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did they know about Martin Luther King? We have, we have left it up. Hope that it could be handled. And I saw it. Could you lower those signs, please? I have some very sad news for all of you, and that is that Martin Luther King was shot and was killed tonight in Memphis. Martin Luther King dedicated his life to love and to justice between fellow human beings. He died in the cause of that effort. In this difficult day, in this difficult time for The United States, it's perhaps well to ask what kind of a nation we are and what direction we want to move in. For those of you who are black, considering the evidence evidently is that there were white people who were responsible, you can be filled with bitterness and with hatred and a desire for revenge. We can move in that direction as a country and greater polarization, black people amongst blacks and white amongst whites filled with hatred toward one another. Or we can make an effort as Martin Luther King did to understand and to comprehend and replace that violence, that stain of bloodshed that is spread across our land with an effort to understand and compassion and love. For those of you who are black and are tempted to fill with be filled with hatred and mistrust of the injustice of such an act against all white people. I would only say that I can also feel in my own heart the same kind of feeling. I had a member of my family killed, but he was killed by a white man. But we have to make an effort in The United States. We have to make an effort to understand, to get beyond or go beyond these rather difficult times. My favorite poem, my my favorite poet was Aeschylus. And he once wrote, even in our heart until in our own despair against our will comes wisdom through the awful grace of God. What we need in The United States is not division. What we need in The United States is not hatred. What we need in The United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love and wisdom and compassion toward one another, feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black. We can do well in this country. We will have difficult times. We've had difficult times in the past, but we will and we will have difficult times in the future. It is not the end of violence. It is not the end of lawlessness, and it's not the end of disorder. But the vast majority of white people and the vast majority of black people in this country want to live together, want to improve the quality of our life, and want justice for all human beings that abide in our land with ourselves to what the Greeks wrote so many years ago to tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of this world. Let us dedicate ourselves to that and say a prayer for our country and for our people. Thank you very much.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

23/ That takes us back to June 5th, 1968. Sirhan Sirhan still maintains his innocence, and claims he can't remember anything about that night. Doctors and experts have questioned & examined him over the years, and some are convinced that he was under hypnosis, or brainwashing. MK-Ultra type of stuff.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

24/ In Ronen Bergman's "Rise And Kill First: The Secret History Of Israel's Targeted Assassinations," he reveals an israeli plot--hatched in May 1968--to brainwash a Palestinian prisoner and use him as a lone gunman to assassinate Yasser Arafat. That's May 1968--just days before RFK was shot by the mentally deranged (at the time) Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan in an apparent perfect setup to make israel look like a sympathetic victim. Do you see what's happening here?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

25/ If RFK had won the presidency, he'd have re-opened the investigation into the JFK assassination *AND* ended the Vietnam War. One can only surmise how catastrophic this would have been for israel and the jewish lobby. Instead, they got away with it, and it's been catastrophic for the United States, and the Middle East. This is the real story of JFK, RFK & MLK.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Jews were responsible for the deaths of the three Kennedys. They allege the "international clique of the sick and wicked" and the Dallas Citizens Council were involved, with Jews creating a cover story through the Warren Commission. According to the speaker, Lee Harvey Oswald was not the mastermind, and Jack Rubenstein, who was Jewish, killed him. They claim Oliver Stone, Arne and Milsson, and Abraham Zapruder, who are Jewish, were involved in creating and disseminating a false narrative. The speaker states the magic bullet theory was impossible and created by Arlen Spector, who is Jewish, to cover up multiple shooters. The speaker alleges the assassination was a Mossad job because Kennedy refused to let Israel have nuclear powers and sided with the Palestinians. They claim RFK was also killed because he didn't believe the official story and would have exposed the truth if he became president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse, and there's nothing I say but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. The international clique of the sick Speaker 1: and wicked, the Dallas Citizens Council are the ones who did this. Once done, the Jews made the moves and bore false witness and created the cover story with their war in commission. They blamed it only Harvey who was not the mastermind. He was shot and killed by the Jew Jack Rubenstein. Some Jews even tried to blame the Cubans for this crime, but the truth lies behind what made Ben Gurion resign. A Jew named Oliver Stone put out the movie JFK produced by the Jew Arne and Milsson to blame the CIA. The Jew who filmed Kennedy getting his head blown off that day was Abraham Zapruder who sold it for 150 k. The magic bullet theory was physically impossible. It's why LBJ had Kennedy's body stolen from the hospital. It was created by Juarl and Spector and spread like gospel to cover up the fact that there were multiple hostiles. Speaker 0: When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. They found a sniper nest Speaker 1: and some pruers, Daltex HQ. There's no chance all this just randomly leads back to Jews. This was a Mossad job to kill a US President that refused to let Israel have nuclear powers that they would abuse. Kennedy also sided with the Palestinians and their plight. He was supportive of Nasser who also put up a fight. The point is all Kennedy wanted to do was make things right, but the Jews couldn't risk it and exercise their might. These are the real reasons. JFK was killed. It had nothing to do with ending the fair silver dollar bill. It had everything to do with him refusing to break his will. And this caused the Jews to kill our president with their shields. And just to be safe, they had to kill RFK because they knew he didn't believe what happened on that day. And if he became president, he would have found out their play. So they hired Eugene and Speaker 0: Caesar to make him go away. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse. But the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse. And there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse. When all three Kennedys died, they called it a curse, but the truth is the Jews put each one in a hearse, and there's nothing I say, but truth in each verse. The Jews and their lies always make things worse.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

26/If you got this far, please consider supporting me as this was an immense amount of work. I'm demonetized here on X, so the only way I can keep doing this is if you support me directly BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & crypto all available. Thx! Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

27/ Here are some of my threads explaining how the Vietnam War was a jewish plot for israel. https://t.co/JafvQyHgWG

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE VIETNAM WAR WAS A JЕWISH PLOT, PART 3: "JFK" THE MOVIE. Memorial Day Rage Edition. People are starting to become aware that the movie "JFK" was a sophisticated piece of propaganda that deflected blame for the assassination of JFK away from israel and onto the CIA, the DOD & the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). Pretty much anyone who wasn't israel or jеws. It was produced by the israeli spy & nuclear weapons smuggler Arnon Milchan, Directed by Oliver Stone (jеw), written by Zachary Sklar (jеw), and promoted by RFK's press secretary Frank Mankiewicz (jеwish member of the ADL, responsible for directing RFK into the pantry where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in June 1968). The movie famously covers up israel's quest for nuclear weapons & JFK's desire to stop it, his efforts to register the jеwish lobby as a foreign agent under FARA, and his promotion of UN Resolution 194 calling for Palestinian Right Of Return. Finally, while it mentions that JFK wanted to exit Vietnam, it omits that he also didn't want to pursue any extensive arms buildup for israel, denying it all offensive weapons and missiles. LBJ reversed all of those policies almost immediately after the assassination--including JFK's planned exit from Vietnam. But the movie also covers up something else through another "limited hangout": that one of the strategic purposes of the Vietnam War wasn't just to make money for the American war machine, but to also build up the war machine to be able to supply israel with the intelligence, armaments & other military capabilities sufficient to overcome its enemies. Without the intelligence, armaments & weapons America supplied to israel throughout the course of the Vietnam War (1964-1973), it's possible israel wouldn't have prevailed in the 1967 6-Day War and absolutely certain it wouldn't have survived the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And without the defense buildup of the American war industry stemming from the Vietnam War, America wouldn't have the capacity to supply israel with those necessary armaments to win. In this way, israel was the top beneficiary of the Vietnam War--just like the War On Terror! Vietnam didn't benefit. America didn't benefit. But israel did. Funny how that keeps happening. This is the other secret agenda that the "JFK" movie obscured. You ever wonder why the Vietnam War wasn't fought to be won and why it just kept pointlessly grinding on? It's because the real point was to keep the War Machine at maximum capacity for israel while the US treaded water in the war effort. Watch this "conspiracy" scene from "JFK" now and see how clever & devious their propaganda is. Note how many truths it blends in with made-up bullsh*t to go along with the glaring omissions. My favorite part is where Donald Sutherland references the crucifixion! Was this a sly tip of the hand that the jеws were behind the assassination? Or maybe it was a nod to well-known jеwish propaganda that the Romans killed Christ--similar to how they allege the CIA killed JFK? Either way, it's eyebrow-raising. The final credits scene drives it all home: it suggests Vietnam was fought for the enrichment of the Military Industrial Complex--which is partially true, but it leaves out the part where that buildup was of crucial benefit and existential necessity to israel. Notably absent from the Vietnam angle in the movie is any mention of Arthur Goldberg, the jеwish UN ambassador who defended US intervention in Vietnam on the world stage; Walt Rostow, the jеwish National Security Advisor & architect of the war; and Eugene Rostow, the jеwish Undersecretary of State who championed the Vietnam war & defended its legal basis. Nor does it mention how Eugene conceived the Warren Commission or was responsible for getting the Mossad-compromised Allen Dulles onto it. Finally, it says nothing about how virtually the entire State Department was completely taken over by zionists. The fact is, a major motive behind the Vietnam War was to help supply israel. And that fact has remain hidden until now, partially due to propaganda like this. Try not to be enraged this Memorial Day as you realize our boys died in Vietnam for jеws & israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. Some knew as early as 1961 that Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisors from Vietnam after Laos. He questioned why the US should go into Vietnam when Cuba was closer. Some felt Kennedy was interfering with defense spending, targeting voting districts with defense contracts. To control Kennedy, McNamara needed to be controlled. The plan started with conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and others. A superior officer was asked for help to create a plan, likely in the South. The plan was singularized with no direct orders or paper trail, ensuring plausible deniability. The goal was to succeed at any cost, with perpetrators never facing prosecution. This was described as a coup d'etat.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

VIETNAM PLOT CONTINUED: Eugene Rostow Exposed Today, I will show you more connections to the Vietnam War as a jеwish plot, and show how it links to the JFK assassination. Our subject: Eugene Rostow. Less than 2 days after the JFK assassination, Eugene Rostow--Russian jеw, Dean https://t.co/ru758CoHde

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers suggested Rostow provide a memorandum for the president, emphasizing the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He said the president could use it in private talks with newsmen or for his joint session next Wednesday night. Moyers wanted the president to reassure the world that America is a land of public order, civility, and guaranteed public safety. Rostow agreed to send a memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Telephone conversation between Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow on 11/24/1963. Time unknown. Speaker 1: Talk to you. Thank you, boy. I'm if I can help in any way, I will. I'm calling with a suggestion. I've just talked to Nick Katzenbach. Yes. And the poor fellow, he has so much of a burden on him. Yes. Talked to him about three times today. And he just sounded so groggy that I thought I'd pass this thought along to you. And, of course, I realize how tough it must be now for the president. In this situation with this bastard killed, my suggestion is that a presidential commission be appointed a very distinguished citizen in the very near future, bipartisan and above politics. No Supreme Court justices, but people like Tom Dewey and, know, Bill Story from Texas. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So on. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: A commission of seven or nine people, maybe Nixon, I don't know Right. To look into the whole affair of the murder of the president. Mhmm. Because world opinion and American opinion is just now so shaken by the behavior of the Dallas police that they're not believing anything. Speaker 0: That's I can understand that. Speaker 1: Now I've got a party here. We've I've been pursuing the the policy, you know, that people need to come together at this time. Speaker 0: You know what you could do that would be very helpful? And this is a this is a good suggestion, and I'll pass it on just a minute. The president's calling. Speaker 1: Hello? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Excuse me. Go ahead. Sure, Bill. Speaker 1: What can I do to go help? Speaker 0: Well, was just thinking coming in a few minutes ago after hearing the news of Hawesville shooting that this is symptomatic of what has been happening into this country in the last few years and the breakdown of respect for law and order, know, that the the signs impeach the supreme court, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. If I could have a memorandum to give to the president along these lines, if one of his great tasks is to help, you know, continue the institutions that seem to be, at least, if not in doubt right now, at least, weakened by some kind of sickness that has taken hold of some parts of our population. I'd like him to to to to have that to consider in in some private talks he's having with newsmen and with perhaps for his joint session next Wednesday night. He needs to make some point, you know, that America is known as a land of public order, a land of civility, a land of in which the public safety is guaranteed. And there's a very serious question right now in the mind of the world about these institutions that undergird us so tremendously. Speaker 1: His Gettysburg speech last spring was just terrific. It hasn't been better. Yes. I'll be glad to send any memo Right away. Speaker 0: Alright. Now your suggestion is that he appoint a special commission of distinguished Americans, primarily in the field of law, I presume, to look into the whole question of the assassination. Speaker 1: That's right. Alright. Report on it. Speaker 0: Alright. I'll get that to him also. I wish you would keep me informed about how Nick is is doing. We don't wanna put any greater strain on him than is necessary. But Speaker 1: Well, he's a great man. Utmost faith in him. Yes. He's he's fighting back. Alright. Terrific strength. Speaker 0: Thanks for calling. I'll I'll follow through. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: Goodbye.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@TruthArchiveAI save thread

BasedSamParker
Posted - May 29, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Saved - May 29, 2025 at 6:39 PM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Get caught up on the Vietnam War/israel angle: https://t.co/JafvQyGJ78

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE VIETNAM WAR WAS A JЕWISH PLOT, PART 3: "JFK" THE MOVIE. Memorial Day Rage Edition. People are starting to become aware that the movie "JFK" was a sophisticated piece of propaganda that deflected blame for the assassination of JFK away from israel and onto the CIA, the DOD & the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). Pretty much anyone who wasn't israel or jеws. It was produced by the israeli spy & nuclear weapons smuggler Arnon Milchan, Directed by Oliver Stone (jеw), written by Zachary Sklar (jеw), and promoted by RFK's press secretary Frank Mankiewicz (jеwish member of the ADL, responsible for directing RFK into the pantry where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in June 1968). The movie famously covers up israel's quest for nuclear weapons & JFK's desire to stop it, his efforts to register the jеwish lobby as a foreign agent under FARA, and his promotion of UN Resolution 194 calling for Palestinian Right Of Return. Finally, while it mentions that JFK wanted to exit Vietnam, it omits that he also didn't want to pursue any extensive arms buildup for israel, denying it all offensive weapons and missiles. LBJ reversed all of those policies almost immediately after the assassination--including JFK's planned exit from Vietnam. But the movie also covers up something else through another "limited hangout": that one of the strategic purposes of the Vietnam War wasn't just to make money for the American war machine, but to also build up the war machine to be able to supply israel with the intelligence, armaments & other military capabilities sufficient to overcome its enemies. Without the intelligence, armaments & weapons America supplied to israel throughout the course of the Vietnam War (1964-1973), it's possible israel wouldn't have prevailed in the 1967 6-Day War and absolutely certain it wouldn't have survived the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And without the defense buildup of the American war industry stemming from the Vietnam War, America wouldn't have the capacity to supply israel with those necessary armaments to win. In this way, israel was the top beneficiary of the Vietnam War--just like the War On Terror! Vietnam didn't benefit. America didn't benefit. But israel did. Funny how that keeps happening. This is the other secret agenda that the "JFK" movie obscured. You ever wonder why the Vietnam War wasn't fought to be won and why it just kept pointlessly grinding on? It's because the real point was to keep the War Machine at maximum capacity for israel while the US treaded water in the war effort. Watch this "conspiracy" scene from "JFK" now and see how clever & devious their propaganda is. Note how many truths it blends in with made-up bullsh*t to go along with the glaring omissions. My favorite part is where Donald Sutherland references the crucifixion! Was this a sly tip of the hand that the jеws were behind the assassination? Or maybe it was a nod to well-known jеwish propaganda that the Romans killed Christ--similar to how they allege the CIA killed JFK? Either way, it's eyebrow-raising. The final credits scene drives it all home: it suggests Vietnam was fought for the enrichment of the Military Industrial Complex--which is partially true, but it leaves out the part where that buildup was of crucial benefit and existential necessity to israel. Notably absent from the Vietnam angle in the movie is any mention of Arthur Goldberg, the jеwish UN ambassador who defended US intervention in Vietnam on the world stage; Walt Rostow, the jеwish National Security Advisor & architect of the war; and Eugene Rostow, the jеwish Undersecretary of State who championed the Vietnam war & defended its legal basis. Nor does it mention how Eugene conceived the Warren Commission or was responsible for getting the Mossad-compromised Allen Dulles onto it. Finally, it says nothing about how virtually the entire State Department was completely taken over by zionists. The fact is, a major motive behind the Vietnam War was to help supply israel. And that fact has remain hidden until now, partially due to propaganda like this. Try not to be enraged this Memorial Day as you realize our boys died in Vietnam for jеws & israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts to military installations and wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets on the moon race, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. By 1961, some knew Kennedy wouldn't escalate war in Southeast Asia. Kennedy told McNamara he would pull advisers from Vietnam, angering some who felt betrayed after Laos. Kennedy questioned why they should enter Vietnam when Cuba was closer. Some believed defense contractors, oil, and bankers were involved in conversations leading to a plan, possibly in the South, where help was needed. The goal was to control intelligence from Saigon and manage McNamara's influence on Kennedy. The plan involved plausible deniability, with no direct orders or paper trails, similar to a military firing squad. The operation had to succeed at any cost, ensuring the perpetrators would never be prosecuted, characterizing it as a coup d'etat.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

VIETNAM PLOT CONTINUED: Eugene Rostow Exposed Today, I will show you more connections to the Vietnam War as a jеwish plot, and show how it links to the JFK assassination. Our subject: Eugene Rostow. Less than 2 days after the JFK assassination, Eugene Rostow--Russian jеw, Dean https://t.co/ru758CoHde

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers asks Rostow for a memorandum for the president regarding the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He suggests the president emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks and a joint session. Rostow agrees to send a memo immediately and Moyers says he will pass along the suggestion of a commission to the president. They briefly discuss Nick Katzenbach and his work.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Telephone conversation between Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow on 11/24/1963. Time unknown. Speaker 1: Talk to you. Thank you, boy. I'm if I can help in any way, I will. I'm calling with a suggestion. I've just talked to Nick Katzenbach. Yes. And the poor fellow, he has so much of a burden on him. Yes. Talked to him about three times today. And he just sounded so groggy that I thought I'd pass this thought along to you. And, of course, I realize how tough it must be now for the president. In this situation with this bastard killed, my suggestion is that a presidential commission be appointed a very distinguished citizen in the very near future, bipartisan and above politics. No Supreme Court justices, but people like Tom Dewey and, know, Bill Story from Texas. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So on. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: A commission of seven or nine people, maybe Nixon, I don't know Right. To look into the whole affair of the murder of the president. Mhmm. Because world opinion and American opinion is just now so shaken by the behavior of the Dallas police that they're not believing anything. Speaker 0: That's I can understand that. Speaker 1: Now I've got a party here. We've I've been pursuing the the policy, you know, that people need to come together at this time. Speaker 0: You know what you could do that would be very helpful? And this is a this is a good suggestion, and I'll pass it on just a minute. The president's calling. Speaker 1: Hello? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Excuse me. Go ahead. Sure, Bill. Speaker 1: What can I do to go help? Speaker 0: Well, was just thinking coming in a few minutes ago after hearing the news of Hawesville shooting that this is symptomatic of what has been happening into this country in the last few years and the breakdown of respect for law and order, know, that the the signs impeach the supreme court, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. If I could have a memorandum to give to the president along these lines, if one of his great tasks is to help, you know, continue the institutions that seem to be, at least, if not in doubt right now, at least, weakened by some kind of sickness that has taken hold of some parts of our population. I'd like him to to to to have that to consider in in some private talks he's having with newsmen and with perhaps for his joint session next Wednesday night. He needs to make some point, you know, that America is known as a land of public order, a land of civility, a land of in which the public safety is guaranteed. And there's a very serious question right now in the mind of the world about these institutions that undergird us so tremendously. Speaker 1: His Gettysburg speech last spring was just terrific. It hasn't been better. Yes. I'll be glad to send any memo right away. Speaker 0: Alright. Now your suggestion is that he appoint a special commission of distinguished Americans, primarily in the field of law, I presume, to look into the whole question of the assassination. Speaker 1: That's right. Alright. Report on it. Speaker 0: Alright. I'll get that to him also. I wish you would keep me informed about how Nick is is doing. We don't wanna put any greater strain on him than is necessary. But Speaker 1: Well, he's a great man. Utmost faith in him. Yes. He's he's fighting back. Alright. Terrific strength. Speaker 0: Thanks for calling. I'll I'll follow through. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: Goodbye.
BasedSamParker
Posted - January 26, 2026 at 1:13 AM
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 6:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that Rosenbaum and the other men were Jewish, and that this explains the drama and kvetching around Kyle Rittenhouse. I claim the entire Jewish community would rally to guilt Americans over guns and the 2nd Amendment. I say Alex Pretti is Jewish too, and he’ll face the same outrage. I assert Pretti supported open borders and “White genocide,” and that organized Jewry will use this to push their agenda against mass deportations and American sovereignty.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Aside from being a child m*lester, Joseph Rosenbaum—the guy in the street fight with Kyle Rittenhouse—was jewish. In fact, all 4 men involved in the shooting events wrt Kyle Rittenhouse that night in Kenosha were jewish. That is why there was so much drama and kvetching over the whole affair. The entire jewish community: online, in the media, in entertainment and politics—all of them—came together to try and lynch Kyle and make Americans feel collectively guilty over the guns and the 2nd amendment. I don't know if the Alex shooting was justified or not, and obviously we should regret the loss of any life, especially that of the innocent. But Alex Pretti was also jewish. And just like with Rittenhouse, we will now be subjected to the same onslaught of jewish outrage. The whole country is, and will be, dragged through a national struggle session and made to feel collective guilt. The fact is Pretti participated in the Floyd riots, and supported open borders & White genocide of America. It's just as Charlie Kirk said: he was one of these radical Leftist Marxist jews pushing their radical agenda. This of course is not a valid reason for taking an innocent life. But it is a grim reminder of the force that is arrayed against the America First agenda. Organized jewry, like the jewish council for public affairs below, will now try even harder to use this to propagandize the country against mass deportations and make us feel collectively guilty for wanting a real country. (I've linked my original Kyle Rittenhouse thread below. It's a shocker of you didn't already understand the jewish angle)

@AuronMacintyre - Auron MacIntyre

A child molester got into a street fight with Kyle Rittenhouse Was his death noble? He would claimed every attribute you are now ascribing to captain Antifa He died for what he believed in, just like every Nazi or Soviet communist It matters what you die for

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

@ryangrim Matt Walsh and these other right-wing empty men who think they're avatars of über-masculinity particularly hate Alex Pretti because he exemplified the virtues they love to extol but are too cowardly to actually embody. They cosplay as trad men by dressing up in campy plaid

BasedSamParker
Posted - January 25, 2026 at 6:26 PM
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 6:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a thread alleging TPUSA ran an illegal voting operation that aided Trump, with a supposed direct cover-up by Trump. It links to an exposé and cites a Treasury/IRS letter signed by Acting Commissioner Scott Bessent, stating no current examinations, timely 990s, and extensions to 2026. The posts question legitimacy, possible leverage over TPUSA and Charlie Kirk, and whether investigations are being suppressed.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BOMBSHELL ALLEGATIONS ALL THE WAY TO THE WHITE HOUSE: In a tour-de-force counterattack since Zack from @FinanceWolves received a cease-and-desist letter from TPUSA, he now outlines an alleged illegal voting operation scheme at TPUSA that helped Trump get elected. And now Trump is allegedly directly helping cover it up. If true, it would actually be grounds for sending ALL of TPUSA execs to prison (like what recently happened to all of the senior leadership at Steve Bannon's non-profit). It could also be grounds for impeachment, similar to when Nixon tried to cover-up the Watergate investigation. I have to ask: is this alleged illegal activity being used to leverage TPUSA's silence & complicity in the Charlie Kirk assassination & cover-up? And does Trump know, or is he being leveraged and/or duped as well? WATCH TO END.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on four nonprofit entities linked to Turning Point: Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, Turning Point Endowment, and America’s Turning Point. Three are 501(c)(3) organizations, Turning Point Action is a 501(c)(4). The difference highlighted is that 501(c)(3) organizations cannot engage in political activity, while 501(c)(4) can participate in up to 50% political activity; there is also Turning Point PAC, a 100% political activity entity. The speaker rejects the idea that having multiple nonprofit companies is normal, arguing that, typically, shell entities are created for distinct activities (e.g., Turning Point Endowment for investments; Turning Point Action as a 501(c)(4)), but questions why America’s Turning Point exists as a separate entity since its descriptions are similar to Turning Point USA and notes a key difference: Charlie Kirk managed Turning Point USA, while Tyler Boyer managed America’s Turning Point. The speaker suggests America’s Turning Point was created to provide Charlie Kirk plausible deniability and to give Tyler Boyer a separate 501(c)(3) that he could control, potentially without Kirk’s knowledge. The nine ninety form is cited as indicating that Turning Point USA’s other educational programs include campus leadership programs hosted by America’s Turning Point, with grants totaling $8,600,000. The speaker questions what those students are doing that costs $8.6 million and speculates that Tyler Boyer uses these students as a pipeline for work under his control. The speaker then posits a scenario: with the 2024 Trump election approaching, Boyer may need more people for ballot harvesting and could be transferring $8.6 million from Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA to America’s Turning Point to hire people for illegal political activity, presenting it as nonpartisan “get out the vote” work to avoid scrutiny. The claim is made that in photos there is no visible nonpolitical activity, prompting the assertion of likely illegality. Further allegations connect to Donald Trump, suggesting the letter with Trump’s alleged handwriting is important as evidence of misappropriated funds used for Trump’s campaign and a potential cover-up in which Trump would be involved. The speaker links this to Steve Bannon’s nonprofit fraud case, noting Bannon’s executives were charged for using funds for a different purpose than donors promised, and that Bannon’s outcome involved a guilty plea rather than prison, implying a harsher outcome for Turning Point’s leadership. The named individuals accused of knowledge or involvement include Tyler Boyer, CFO Justin Olson, Andrew Colvet, Blake Neff, and Erica Kirk, with a suggestion that anyone aware of the political activity and cover-up would face prison. The speaker calls for law enforcement action and criticizes Trump for allegedly tolerating election-related fraud among his associates, concluding with anger over the situation and a perceived hypocrisy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let us look again at the four nonprofit companies. We have Turning Point USA, Turning Point Action, Turning Point Endowment, and America's Turning Point. Three of these companies are five zero one(three) organizations. Turning Point Action is a five zero one(four). The difference is that a five zero one c three is not allowed to participate in political activity. A five zero one c four can participate in no more than 50% political activity. And then there is also Turning Point PAC, which is a 100% political activity. Now I have seen arguments from people claiming that this is normal. They say it is normal for nonprofits to have multiple different companies. Not like this it's not. Do not let people gaslight you about what's going on here. Let me explain what is unusual. You would normally create different shell companies for different types of activities. For instance, Turning Point Endowment is for their investments. That's clearly a different type of activity. It gets its own company. That makes sense. Turning Point Action is a five zero one(four). That's a different type of activity, so it gets its own company. What is this? Why is America's Turning Point separate? The company descriptions on the nine ninety form are very similar. It's basically education for young people. So why are these two different companies? The only major difference that I see is that Charlie Kirk managed Turning Point USA, and Tyler Boyer managed America's Turning Point. So in a way, America's Turning Point existed to give Charlie Kirk plausible deniability. It gave Tyler Boyer his own five zero one c three where he could do whatever he wanted, and Charlie Kirk would not necessarily know about it. This is explained in the fine print of the nine ninety form for Turning Point USA, which says, Turning Point USA's other educational programs include campus leadership programs, which are hosted by Turning Point USA's related entity, America's Turning Point, with grants totaling $8,600,000. So what is Tyler Boyer doing with these students? It sounds like this leadership program is a pipeline for these students to go work for Tyler Boyer. Wonder what these students are doing that costs $8,600,000. So let me tell you what I think is going on. Tyler Boyer manages these political companies. The Trump election is coming up in 2024. Tyler Boyer realizes he needs more people to do ballot harvesting. So he decides, let's just steal the donations from Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA. So he transfers $8,600,000 into the company he manages, America's Turning Point. And then he hires a bunch of people for illegal political activity. And he tells everyone, come on. No one will ever know. Charlie Kirk doesn't even have to know. We will just say it is nonpartisan. We will call it get out the vote efforts. No one's ever gonna ask questions. No one will ever look at the photographs. Don't worry about it. If all of these people getting paid from America's turning point are not doing political activity, then what are they doing? In none of the photos I have seen, is there anything that would qualify as nonpolitical activity? So what are they doing? In my opinion, this looks blatantly illegal. It looks like they are stealing donations and using them for something different than what they promised the donors. What they are allegedly using it for is illegal activity. This is why the letter with Donald Trump's alleged handwriting is so important. It looks like they stole the money to use on Donald Trump's campaign. And now Donald Trump himself could be involved in an attempt to cover up the fraud at Turning Point, the same fraud that he himself benefited from. Is this how Donald Trump is planning for Republicans to win the midterm elections? This week, Candace Owens broke a shocking news story. Speaker 1: I think about the size and scale of the event that they put on at at Charlie's Memorial Service. They had AmFest. They had a huge donor thing at Mar A Lago. So everyone's been killing themselves, and no one's getting raises and bonuses. And yet, according to this person, Turning Point USA has brought in $250,000,000 since Charlie's assassination. Speaker 0: $250,000,000. Are the Turning Point executives planning on stealing those donations and using those funds illegally for political activity? Because that is what it looks like. Remember what happened with Steve Bannon. He had a nonprofit where he was trying to raise money to build the wall at the border. He and his entire leadership team was charged with fraud because they were accused of using funds for a different purpose than they promised donors. Now I have a whole separate video going over Steve Bannon's case, and I think that what happened to him was unfair, and he should never have been prosecuted. But they were prosecuted, and three executives went to prison. The only reason Steve Bannon didn't go to prison was that he took a deal where he plead guilty. So if we were to apply that same standard to the case I have laid out against Turning Point, the entire leadership team would go straight to prison. Tyler Boyer, prison. The CFO, Justin Olson, prison. Andrew Colvet, prison. Blake Neff, prison. Anyone who knew about the political activity and was involved in the cover up would go to prison. And, yes, that includes Erica Kirk, whose name is on the letter with Donald Trump's alleged handwriting. Donald Trump, who talks all the time about election integrity, apparently does not care about election related fraud when it deals with his friends. I am angry. I believed Donald Trump when he said that the Democrats were cheating in the elections. Speaker 2: It was a rigged election. Everybody now knows that. They found out. People will soon be prosecuted for what they did. It's probably breaking news, but it should be. It was a rigged election. Can't have rigged elections. Speaker 0: But doesn't this make him a hypocrite? How can he talk about election integrity and then help to cover up what Turning Point is doing? If I were Steve Bannon, I would be so angry. Steve Bannon's life was destroyed over his nonprofit. And what these people at Turning Point are doing is allegedly so much worse, and they're not even getting a slap on the wrist. This is so unjust and so unfair. I think it is time for law enforcement to start taking action.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Watch his entire exposé here, where he brings all the receipts: https://t.co/dw2tMOpKSP

@FinanceWolves - WolvesAndFinance

Turning Point Fraud Is OUT OF CONTROL (allegedly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QwGo0LyZ3I

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Full text of letter to Erika Kirk from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who signed it as acting commissioner of the IRS. Is this normal? https://t.co/EBHRsdQj7f

@JGlasseir - The Speaker 🇺🇲

Shoking letter from allegedly "IRS" to TPUSA. Is this really coming from the IRS signed by Secretary of State Scott Basset? Why? DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 December 4, 2025 Mrs. Charles Kirk c/o Turning Point USA Inc. 135 N. Pennsylvania St. 1610 Indianapolis, IN 46204 RE: Request for Return Information of: Turning Point USA Inc., EIN 80-0835023 Turning Point Action Inc., EIN 46-4331510 Turning Point Endowment Inc., EIN 82-1225311 America's Turning Point Inc., EIN 81-4294120 --- Dear Mrs. Kirk Erika --- This is in response to your letter of December 3, 2025, in which you requested certain return information of the four tax exempt entities listed above for which you are Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, or President. In particular, you requested the following information: 1 - Whether any returns filed by these entities are being examined or subject to any other current returns investigation by the IRS, and if so, a description of the nature of any such activity. 2 - Confirmation that the above-named entities submitted on time and to the IRS by May 15, 2025, their respective IRS Forms 990 for the tax year beginning July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024. 3 - Confirmation that the above named organizations are not required to submit until May 15, 2026, their respective IRS Forms 990 for the tax year beginning July 1, 2024, and ending June 30, 2025. The following information is in response to your requests: 1 - IRS records reflect that IRS is not examining the returns of any of the listed entities, nor is any examination or investigation activity currently underway with respect to any of the four organizations' returns. 2 - IRS records reflect that IRS Forms 990 for tax years July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, were timely filed with IRS by May 15, 2025, under extensions, for all four entities. 3 - IRS records reflect that all four entities have submitted extensions of time to file their returns for the periods beginning July 1, 2024, and ending June 30, 2025, until May 15, 2026. If you require any further information or documentation, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Scott Bessent Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service Source @FinanceWolves @ProjectConstitu @RealCandaceO

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Ryanmatta @FinanceWolves Appreciated, as always!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Shillin4Shekels @FinanceWolves If it comes to that. Doubtful. The regime controls all the levers of investigation. His letter, if true, looks to be all that is necessary for now. Nobody in the Admin is going to investigate.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@TheBuckYouWill @FinanceWolves Bro, he came out throwing haymakers today

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@IanMalcolm84 @FinanceWolves Yep

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Whitaker2Pg @FinanceWolves How do you think i was able to edit together this video without watching it? Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Zebecian @FinanceWolves Yes, interesting, isn't it?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@breathe123 @FinanceWolves Yeah, if there were something hey big & dirty at TPUSA, it's reasonable to think that Charlie knew something about it. OTOH, he did want to do that DOGE thing, so maybe he didn't know know, but was starting to suspect.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@missedme1016 @FinanceWolves Accurate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@nonameava1labl @FinanceWolves 👀

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@AngelaWinn51203 @FinanceWolves Anything that goes to Trump goes to his boss Bibi for sure

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@JeffLevin176661 @FinanceWolves Oh look, the jewbots are out. Guess we're on the right track. https://t.co/KftuSxyb1O

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@sleezekitty @FinanceWolves Ballzy

BasedSamParker
Posted - January 6, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Iran-Contra as Israel using the US to advance its own interests, framing it as anti-communism. Venezuela appears similar: a long Israeli-Nicaragua link, US weapons routes, and today’s petrodollar protection via Paul Singer, BlackRock, Goldman Sachs. Weinberger and Abrams were central, later pardoned per Barr’s advice. The claim: the “Monroe Doctrine” masks gains for a global Jewish empire, not ordinary Americans.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

HOW VENEZUELA RHYMES WITH IRAN-CONTRA: Both Plays For Our Greatest Allies Disguised As Plays For America Anyone wanna discuss how israel invented the so-called "Iran-Contra" scheme for its own benefit, parasitizing American power & using us as their patsy—while framing it as our benefit to get rid of "muh communists!"? Reminds me of what just happened in Venezuela. But first, Iran-Contra. History tells you israel was the middle man in the US-to-israel-to-Iran weapons deals in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq War, but actually israel began the weapons trafficking to Iran *BEFORE* Iran-Contra was concocted. (At the time, Iraq was the greater enemy to israel, so israel was supplying Iran to prolong the war and keep them both occupied fighting each other rather than israel). History will also tell you the US intervened in Nicaragua by supporting the Contras because of "muh communists!" the Sandinistas. But the reality is israel historically had a "special relationship" with Nicaragua. israel was Nicaragua's main weapons supplier & Nicaragua was a reliable vote for israel at the UN. Then the Sandinistas rose to power, began supporting Palestine, and stopped recognizing israel. They were explicitly anti-zionist. Their anti-israel messaging grew even stronger after israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982, which prompted Nicaragua to sever diplomatic ties to israel. The ADL became involved. This kind of outrage simply could not stand, of course. All of a sudden, those israeli weapons shipments to Iran became US shipments to Iran (via israel, who BTW got to take a cut). And all of a sudden, the US needed to get rid of those communist Sandinistas in Nicaragua! Our backyard! Monroe Doctrine! And who were two of the top masterminds complicit in this arrangement? Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger & Assistant Secretary of State Elliott Abrams*. Do I need to tell you their ethnicity? They ended up getting pardoned by President George HW Bush on the advice of Attorney General Bill Barr (also the same ethnicity). The same Bill Barr who was AG again when Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself. The same Jeffrey Epstein who was up to his eyeballs helping broker Iran-Contra. Again, same ethnicity.... I think you're following me now. Beginning to see the real picture of what was going down. Isn't it convenient how they called it "Iran-Contra," thus essentially hiding jewish-israeli involvement? And isn't it interesting that it's the Gentile Oliver North who was painted as the mastermind, and not someone like, say, Caspar Weinberger SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. jews have been selling us the "We gotta beat the communists!" for a long time in order to benefit themselves and their global jewish empire—except for when they needed us to team up with the worst communists ever to beat "muh Nazis!" (Also, to benefit themselves). That war, btw, gave us communist China & North Korea. See also: Vietnam, and Ukraine-Russia ("muh Russians" is basically "muh communists"). Both wars for the jewish Global Empire. At this point, I don't care if something kind of benefits, or somewhat benefits, America if it disproportionately benefits our Occupiers even more. When that happens, they are only enabled to fortify their occupation over us, regardless of the benefits to America. As it was, what exactly was the benefit to America of Iran-Contra? There were none. The "Cui bono" went to someone else. And that's what it looks like will be the case in Venezuela. Yes, it temporarily helps preserve the petrodollar. But if you've been watching the involvement of super-zio jew Paul Singer, and you're aware of Blackrock's & Goldman Sachs' stake in Venezuela—then I think you'll see that maybe the "Monroe Doctrine" wasn't really the play here. The larger benefits will accrue to the global jewish empire, not rank and file Americans. Why are the israelis so downright giddy about our action in Venezuela? Can we Americans please stop falling for it? And never forget who gave us communism in the first place! #Bellumjudaica not #Paxjudaica *BTW, that same Elliott Abrams later served in the first Trump administration as the United States Special Representative to both Iran & Venezuela. Cohencidence? Receipts:

BasedSamParker
Posted - January 5, 2026 at 8:28 PM
Saved - January 5, 2026 at 10:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread argues a sequence where oil collapse, distressed Venezuelan bonds, and repeated sanctions set the stage for asset sales and crypto-based pivots (Petro, BTC, USDT) to bypass freezes. Beneficiaries cited include Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Paul Singer, and others; claims of Zionist and tech-finance interests gaining power. The author questions whether the action helps or harms U.S. sovereignty and American workers, asking who benefited more. A responder adds two additional sanction–migration and energy ambitions examples.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

VENEZUELA: ANATOMY OF AN ECONOMIC HITJOB—The story of how our favorite ethnic oligarchs stole Venezuela for their international empire, but made it look like it was for our "American Empire" in the process. Q: Was the Venezuelan action good for America? Well, IMO that's the wrong question. The right question is: Was it was better for Our Greatest Ally or for us on a relative basis? I'll lay out the timeline, then explain my answer to this question. TIMELINE In June 2014, the price of oil plummeted, hitting Venezuela's main revenue source. In 2015, Venezuelan bonds, based on that oil, officially became distressed. Paul Singer's Elliott Management began buying these bonds at a discount, which were then trading at 50-70 cents on the dollar. By 2016, BlackRock was also buying these distressed bonds. In May 2017, Goldman Sachs purchased $2.8 Billion of these bonds at 31 cents on the dollar. In August 2017, Trump begins placing sanctions on Venezuela. He will increase the sanctions again in 2018, 2019 & 2020. By the end of 2017, as a result of the sanctions, the distressed Venezuelan bonds go into default. December 2017, Venezuela announced the Petro (a state-backed cryptocurrency tied to oil reserves) as a sanctions-bypass tool. The regime also began BTC mining operations. 2018–2020: Gold-to-Bitcoin Swaps. Venezuela exported 73 tons ($2.7 billion) of Orinoco gold to countries like Turkey and the UAE. The proceeds were converted into BTC at the then current prices of ~$5,000–$10,000, forming the initial BTC reserve. BTC was also used for imports from Iran and Turkey. 2019–2022, Venezuela began subsidizing electricity, making it a BTC mining hub, which saw Chinese BTC operations move in. May 2021, Robert Pincus is appointed by a US judge as Special Master to oversee the auction of PDV Holdings (Venezuelan oil) to pay off the bond debt. 2023–2025: Venezuela's Oil-to-USDT-to-Bitcoin Pivot. State oil firm PDVSA demanded payments in Tether (USDT) for exports (up to 80% by late 2025) to evade frozen accounts. Tether holdings were converted to BTC. Total holdings swell to $60 Billion. In 2024, Special Master Robert Pincus recommends Venezuelan oil assets be sold to Paul Singer's Amber Energy. November 2025, the US judge approves the sale of PDV/Citgo to Paul Singer's Amber Energy for $5.9 Billion, over the objections of Venezuela which appealed the ruling. Amber Energy will pay $2.1 Billion to bond holders. SUMMARY & ANALYSIS FOR NOTICERS: (Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, Paul Singer, Robert Pincus....) need I go on? With the help of zion-Don & the hijacked US military, israel-first jewish billionaires will get the long-awaited payout on their distressed investment gamble and seize control of Venezuela's oil, while the US Gov will take the strategic BTC reserve. It's unclear so far the ultimate fate of that BTC, but I'm sure the Crypto-Bros who bankrolled Trump's 2024 campaign will be very happy. And I'm sure plenty will find its way to Blackrock, helping it strengthen its grip over the financial system. The Silicon Valley tech bros will also now get to plunder other Venezuelan mineral resources to build & power their tech at a discount, and increase their relative power over us little guys, too. With full access to and control over Venezuelan oil, israel and the zog'd out USGov are poised to make another run at Iran while simultaneously grabbing OPEC by the balls and further stressing China's access to oil (which buys 89% of Iran's oil & 45% of Venezuela's). I think we see now why the israel-first crowd & Netanyahu were so happy about this action. Not to mention that Venezuela was firmly anti-zionist while being an important trading partner with Iran, helping both of them evade sanctions. This has helped Iran check israeli power in the middle east. The main benefits to this intervention look to accrue to jewish & Zionist billionaires, financiers, tech oligarchs, israel, and other zionist-aligned people & entities. Does strengthening and enriching those powers help America-First Americans? Is giving Silicon Valley even more relative power good or bad for America-First sovereignty? Is making Blackrock more powerful good for us? Yes, it does help to preserve the petro-dollar, which in the short term helps regular Americans. But the petrodollar play feels like it's just the bribing of Americans, so that we won't object to our own country being occupied and plundered by the same people plundering Venezuela. Does the petrodollar help us regain our sovereignty, or does it just keep us complacent? And doesn't it also help our Overseers who also deal in dollars and dominate the worldwide financial system? Whom does it help more on a relative basis? Aren't we just making our Masters stronger relative to us, further bolstering their grasp over us? Are we really building "American Empire?" Or are we parasitizing America to build the international jewish empire and Greater israel? Which will then allow them to dominate us even harder than they already do? IMO, they're playing on our collective American Ego and creature comforts to sleepwalk us into their digital control grid, Project Stargate, CBDC, AI, social credit, surveillance, police state. I'm at the point now where if THEY want something, I don't want them to have it. Simple as. Is Venezuela really the Monroe Doctrine? Or is it Globalist Talmudic Doctrine selling you snake oil labeled as the Monroe Doctrine? Who did this action benefit more, Them or Us?

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

@BasedSamParker Very nice analysis. Here are two additional examples. - Timeline of US Sanctions that fueled migration - Elon Musk’s Uranium goals in Venezuela https://t.co/59Zr2Z2D9F

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

x.com/i/article/1818…

BasedSamParker
Posted - January 4, 2026 at 5:31 PM
Saved - January 4, 2026 at 11:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A sequence claims Charlie Kirk opposed regime-change wars (Iran, Ukraine) and would have opposed Venezuela too, arguing to Trump and mobilizing TPUSA youth against them and against AIPAC. Posts emphasize his widespread influence, membership growth, and leadership of a youth movement. The discussion ends with a reflective question on the overall impact of his stance and efforts.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Never Forget: Charlie Kirk adamantly opposed the "Neocon" & regime change wars—EVEN IF DONE ON BEHALF OF ISRAEL. He unleashed a flurry of tweets & videos arguing against them last summer. It's clear he would have opposed regime change in Venezuela, too. https://t.co/bQMY7uK9lq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility of striking Iran to eliminate its nuclear program and the broader implications of regime change. - Speaker 0 acknowledges arguments that Israel has wanted to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program, and that American involvement with B-52s and large bombs might be needed to finish the job. He notes the idea of a strike that proceeds quickly with minimal American casualties, under a Trump-era frame that Iran will not get a nuclear bomb. - He observes a shift among Washington’s neoconservative and Republican circles from opposing Iran’s nuclear capability to opposing Ayatollah rule itself, suggesting a subtle change in objectives while maintaining the theme of intervention. He concedes cautious support if Trump executes it prudently, but warns of a “switcheroo” toward regime change rather than purely disabling the nuclear program. - Speaker 0 criticizes the record of neocons on foreign policy (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, the Arab Spring) and argues that the entire Middle East bears their failures. He emphasizes a potential regime-change drive and questions what would come after removing the Ayatollah, including possible US troop deployments and financial support for a new regime. - He highlights the size of Iran (about 92,000,000 people, two and a half times the size of Texas) and warns that regime change could trigger a bloody civil war and a large refugee crisis, possibly drawing tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths and destabilizing Europe. - Speaker 1 presents a more vocal stance: he would like to see the regime fall and leaves to the president the timing and method, insisting that if the nuclear program isn’t eliminated now, “we’ll all regret it” and urging to “be all in” to help Israel finish the job. - In cuts 3:43, Speaker 1 argues that removing the Ayatollah’s regime would be beneficial because staying in power would continue to threaten Israel, foment terrorism, and pursue a bomb; he characterizes the regime as aiming to destroy Jews and Sunni Islam, calling them “fanatical religious Nazis.” - Speaker 0 responds that such a forceful call for regime change is immature, shallow, and reckless, warning that certainty about outcomes in foreign interventions is impossible. He asserts that the first rule of foreign policy is humility, noting that prior interventions led to prolonged conflict and mass displacement. He cautions against beating the drums for regime change in another Middle Eastern country, especially the largest, and reiterates that the issue is not simply removing the nuclear program but opposing Western-led regime change. - The discussion frames a tension between supporting efforts to deny Iran a nuclear weapon and resisting Western-led regime change, with a strong emphasis on potential humanitarian and geopolitical consequences. The speakers reference public opinion (citing 86% of Americans not wanting Iran to have a bomb) and critique interventions as historically destabilizing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were told all along by US lawmakers that we need to take out the Iranian nuclear program, and and you can make a good argument for that. You can make an argument that Israel has wanted to do that for quite some time. It's becoming more and more clear to the surface that Israel will not be able to finish the fight unless American b 52 bunker busting bombs will get involved. Okay. You can hold that position, and you can hope for the best. You can hope that there is a strike when we get in and we get out, and we use the Moab and a fur 30,000, 40,000 pound bomb, 30,000 pound bomb, and it works perfectly and hopefully no US troops die in response. I can understand that argument. I really can. President Trump has been consistent for over a decade saying that Iran will not get a nuclear bomb. Iran will not get a nuclear bomb. President Trump has said that for ten years. However, if you watch carefully and closely amongst the Washington DC and neoconservative, neoint imperialist class, especially in the Republican party, they've kinda shifted gears here. They've shifted gears from Iran should not have a nuclear weapon to Iran should not have an Ayatollah. And they've tried to ever so subtly shift the Overton window as if we weren't paying attention. So wait a second. Hold on. First, it was that Israel is gonna take out the nuclear weapon. And then it was, well, America is going to help Israel take out the nuclear weapon. Still the same theme, but a shift, but still the same theme. One that is defensible if done correctly and prudently. I have some caution towards that intervention, but I I can get it. I can get behind that if president Trump executed executes in a way that only he can. But hold on a second. They're trying to pull a switcheroo. Yesterday afternoon, the neocons that have been wrong about every major foreign policy decision of the last twenty years, they were wrong about Afghanistan. They were wrong about Iraq. They were wrong about Libya. They were wrong about Syria. They were wrong about the Arab Spring. The entire Middle East is filled. It is it is at capacity with their failures. You cannot point to a random Middle East country without seeing somewhere that John Bolton, Lindsey Graham, and the entire gang of ferocious neoconservatives have messed up. So we would have been told it's all about nuclear weapons, but it seems as if there's a more aggressive push to get rid of the Ayatollah. Now to be clear, of course, we on this program wanna see the people of Persia resume self determination. The Persian people are wonderful. They're the highest IQ people on the planet are right near it. They're incredibly industrious. The Persians that I know across Chicago where I grew up or in Phoenix are amazing. In Scottsdale, they literally have a restaurant called the Persian Room. I get it. But this is a completely different thing. If the people of Persia wanna take back their government organically, authentically from the ground up, we will be cheering them on. Of course, we will. But Western forced central planning regime change is if we are just gonna take out the Ayatollah. Oh, really? What comes next? What comes after regime change? Might be, oh, well, we need a small number of US troops to support the new regime. And then, well, the new regime needs our financial support then. Okay. Then we need a few more US troops. We have seen this play before. Or get regime change, you have no idea how this is gonna work out. You have no idea. The best case scenario the best case scenario is, like, probably 5,000 US troops and a $100,000,000,000. The probably most probable scenario is a bloody civil war that results in a couple 100,000 people dead, all these different ethnic groups fighting. Iran is a country of 92,000,000 people. Let me repeat. Iran is a country of 92,000,000 people. It's two and a half times the size of Texas. We've been reporting this on our program last couple of days. It is a beast of a country. Not to mention you could trigger another refugee crisis coming to the West. And so Lindsey Graham, listen very carefully. He we went from take out the nuclear program to regime change in just a couple of days. This is why our program is succeeding right now because we are taking a nonideological patriotic America first attack approach right now where other people are all the place. No intervention or any circumstances. Okay. I can hear that. I can sympathize with that, but 86% of Americans don't want Iran to have a nuclear bomb. Or you have the people to redesign the entire Middle East in their image. Meanwhile, our country is collapsing. Let's play first three forty two. This is Lindsey Graham. He lives for this, by the way. Lindsey Graham's identity, his reason for being, his excitement, his thrill is to try and execute regime change in Iran. Play cut three forty two. Speaker 1: I hope it's eliminated. I would like to see this regime fall, but I'm a leave it up to the president as to what to do and when to do it. But I do know this. If we don't take out their nuclear program now, we'll all regret it. We're very close. Be all in, mister president, and helping Israel finish the job, and let's see where we're at after we, neutralize our nuclear program. Speaker 0: Now now he continues in cut three forty three, which is the real incriminating one. I would like to see this regime fall. He says that, but he continues. Play cut three forty three. Speaker 1: Here's what I can say. Taking the Ayatollah's regime down is a good thing, not a bad thing. And I'm willing to risk what happens next because I know what's gonna happen if they stay in power. They're gonna keep trying to destroy Israel. They're keep fomenting terrorism, and they're gonna try to build a bomb, and they'll use it until they're gone. Their goal is a religious goal to destroy the Jews, to destroy Sunni Islam, to destroy us. These are fanatical religious Nazis. I'm willing to risk them leaving. I think it will only get better. Speaker 0: Sounds good. Right? That is such an immature, shallow, sloppy, irresponsible, insane, frenetic approach from a US lawmaker. Oh, I I know what happens when they remain. Actually, you don't know that, Lindsey Graham. The first rule of foreign policy is you must enter things with humility. That is the first rule. You don't know how things are gonna work out, actually. You could predict them. You can have probability. You could look to history, but you don't know with certainty. And that kind of arrogance and that kind of pride is exactly why we got into the quagmire of Iraq and Afghanistan and why Libya is still in a civil war and why 600,000 people died in the Syrian civil war resulting in 6,000,000 refugees largely remaking the polity and the entire demographic composition of Europe because we thought we knew. No. You don't know, actually. In fact, it could be a catastrophe, and I'm gonna build out more why we must together resist regime change. It's not about taking out the nuclear program. That's a separate topic. You could support that. That is defensible. It is indefensible after everything we've seen the last twenty five years to start beating the drums for regime change at yet another Middle Eastern country. This one being the biggest of all we have dared to get involved in.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Here's just a few of Charlie's tweets opposing regime change: https://t.co/9WLmbl2XNB

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Charlie went to the White House, to Trump himself and argued right to Trump's face to not do regime change https://t.co/aNGSWiAGA5

Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker describes a person who was “one of the only people… to go to the president whom he loved” and notes that the president “loved him in a real way.” This person, who truly cared for his country, went to the Oval Office to tell the president that while Iran is really bad, “a war with Iran is not… something that could really hurt our country.” It was an unpopular position, and he “didn’t need to express it,” yet he did, without pursuing some hostile agenda. He was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing and spoke that truth when he faced the president. The speaker adds that this person “took massive, massive abuse from his own donors.” The donors had different views and expressed them intensely, but the person “loved his donors,” and he confronted them by presenting his own stance: “look, I understand your perspective. This is my perspective, and we're gonna do what we think is the right thing, the wise thing.” Another point emphasizes that he was “the voice of young people.” The speaker asserts that there are “no young people in the country anymore supporting this war and wanting Israel to continue its bombing campaign,” stating that this reflects the truth of the polls. He was in touch with young people and, even when his own opinion differed from theirs, felt he owed it to them “to bring their message to the sitting president of The United States.” The speaker concludes with a somber note, stating that the situation has been, in his view, snuffed out, “as he has been, unfortunately.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He was one of the only people, I mean truly one of the only people to go to the president whom he loved. He loved Donald Trump, like personally as well, and I think the president really loved him in a real way. But he was one of only people to go to the Oval Office and say, sir, I totally understand and think Iran's really bad, but a war with Iran is not, you know, is something that could really hurt our country. I mean, that was an unpopular position. He didn't need to express it. Of course. And he did it again. He didn't have some weird agenda. He wasn't mad at anybody. He was for his country, and he was for doing the right and wise and difficult thing. And he said that. He went to the Oval Office to say that. He took massive, massive abuse from his own donors, which is also something that you don't see people, and he loved his donors, it wasn't a hostile thing, but they had a different view, a lot of them, not all, but a lot. And they expressed it to him in a very intense way, I know because he showed me. And he said, look, I understand your perspective. This is my perspective, and we're gonna do what we think is the right thing, the wise thing. Speaker 1: In that way too, he was the voice of young people. I mean, there are no young people in the country anymore supporting this war and wanting Israel to continue its bombing campaign. That's just the truth. Look at the polls, and he was in touch with them. And even where his own opinion may have differed from their opinion, he felt like he owed it to them to bring their message to the sitting president of The United States. I mean, it was that's that's what's been snuffed out. Speaker 0: Well, as he has been, unfortunately.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Charlie opposed the Ukraine war, too. Charlie was in direct opposition to the israeli-Neocon War Machine: https://t.co/G9nYPIGxRu

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ How much more clear could Charlie be? He was not only against it in Iran, but he would have been against it in Venezuela, too. https://t.co/3riguqvzAe

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ But it wasn't merely that Charlie was personally against these wars (for israel), it was that he was using his massive national organization to make it okay oppose them as well. Charlie wasn't one voice he was hundreds of thousands of voices. Maybe millions. Here was the current TPUSA membership & projected growth before he was assassinated.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ But he wasn't just opposing the regime change wars & making it okay for hundreds of thousands of youth to oppose them, he was motivating the youth & making it okay to oppose AIPAC, too: https://t.co/V5JSay5Tq2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the way lawmakers reference religion in foreign policy and whether that approach is effective. Speaker 0 asks the audience how many think a respected lawmaker like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, even if he doesn’t know the verse, and whether that is the best approach. Speaker 1 responds by referencing Ted Cruz’s Genesis twelve three, and notes that many find that off-putting when contrasted with the New Testament, specifically Paul’s writings about the new flesh not being the same as the people in the old covenant. Speaker 1 asks, “Yes. Romans nine?” and agrees with the sentiment. Speaker 0 then asks Speaker 1 if they are Catholic, to which Speaker 1 replies that they are converting Catholic from Judaism, revealing that they are ethnically Jewish. The exchange confirms Speaker 1’s Jewish ethnicity. Speaker 0 brings up concerns about APAC, asking if Speaker 1 has concerns about APAC. Speaker 1 confirms that they do. Speaker 0 notes that some people tell them that criticizing APAC equates to being anti-Semitic, asking whether this is true. Speaker 1 calls that notion ridiculous and says it’s great to have concern for one’s country. The conversation shifts to APAC’s influence. Speaker 0 presents a characterization (as a possible summary of Speaker 1’s view) that APAC represents a form of prioritization that cuts in line, away from the American people. Speaker 0 asks whether this is a fair summary. Speaker 1 answers affirmatively, “100%.” Finally, they articulate the core idea: the public votes and are citizens, but a separate group is described as receiving higher priority for whatever reasons. Speaker 1’s agreement underscores a shared concern that APAC’s influence creates a prioritization that bypasses the ordinary American electorate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: I think Ted Cruz's Genesis twelve three, I think a lot of people see that as off putting when you look at the New Testament. Why? Because I think a lot of people, they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how that the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's. Everyone's talking about Romans nine? Yes. Yeah. Speaker 0: Are you Catholic? Speaker 1: Converting Catholic from Judaism. This is my next Speaker 0: Oh, from Judaism? Yes. Oh, wow. So so you're Jew you're ethnically Jewish. Speaker 1: Ethnically Jewish. Speaker 0: Yes. And you have concerns about APAC. Yes. Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 0: I'm told that by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize APAC, I'm anti Semitic. Speaker 1: I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country. Speaker 0: Do you think that the that APAC represents Again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people. Yes. Would you guys say that's a fair summary? Speaker 1: 100%. Speaker 0: Meaning that, like, okay. We vote. We're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ What does it all add up to? https://t.co/Ar7brJz65b

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

The best high-level explanation of why Charlie Kirk was neutralized: Charlie opposed "Neocon" regime change wars AND he led a following of hundreds of thousands of people that he was organizing to oppose them as well. THEY tried to buy him (w/o success), leaving only one option: https://t.co/KLd8KO2rCi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Never Forget: Charlie Kirk adamantly opposed the "Neocon" & regime change wars—EVEN IF DONE ON BEHALF OF ISRAEL. He unleashed a flurry of tweets & videos arguing against them last summer. It's clear he would have opposed regime change in Venezuela, too. https://t.co/bQMY7uK9lq

BasedSamParker
Posted - December 19, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 8:35 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING, MUST WATCH: Frank Turek said he was FaceTiming his family when Charlie Kirk was k*lled, but was he actually watching secret drone surveillance instead? IMO, I think he might have been—and ironically, it's the alleged arm signal from Dan Flood that could prove it: https://t.co/RaJlsJ5zAi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a video analysis centered on Frank Turek during an event with Charlie, focusing on whether Frank was FaceTiming his wife and son/daughter-in-law or viewing drone surveillance footage. The speaker asserts that Frank, initially seen on the left of Charlie and later to Charlie’s right, was FaceTiming someone but then shifted to viewing surveillance footage, likely from a drone, rather than the FaceTime call. Key claims and sequence: - The narrator describes Frank standing to Charlie’s right behind him, holding a phone, and initially FaceTiming someone while Charlie sits and asks questions. The claim is that Frank’s FaceTime feed shows a woman and a picture-in-picture frame, suggesting FaceTiming with someone. - The speaker contends that the phone Frank is using for the FaceTime appears different from the phone he uses to view drone footage, noting discrepancies in phone appearance (dimensions, front/back features, button color). - The analysis shifts to allegedly showing that Frank’s phone screen is displaying drone surveillance footage rather than faces. The speaker points to frames where objects on the screen resemble a car, trees, a building with a spire or fountain, and a golf cart, arguing these are not faces or reflections. - A key part of the argument is a claimed cross-angle discrepancy: Dan Flood’s tattooed arm appears on Frank’s phone screen at angles inconsistent with the real arm’s orientation, implying the feed is from a different camera angle than Frank’s own position. The speaker argues this mismatch indicates a surveillance feed, possibly from a drone, rather than a direct FaceTime view of a person. - The footage sequence allegedly shows movement synchronized between Frank’s phone screen and what’s happening off-screen, including observations of an arm, two legs, and later a moment that might depict Charlie tipping over after an incident. - The presenter points out a potential visual link between a tire/hubcap and a vehicle seen earlier on Frank’s phone, inviting viewers to compare frames and decide if they are the same. - The speaker invites the audience to review the footage themselves, proposes that Frank was not FaceTiming anyone, and suggests that he may have switched to drone footage. They emphasize that this is a theory that should be investigated and encourage downloading the footage to form a conclusion. - Acknowledgment is given to Indi Rose of the Let Me Stop You There podcast, whose analysis influenced the video, with an invitation to followers to review her work and compare viewpoints. Overall, the transcript details a contested interpretation: whether Frank used FaceTime as claimed or was viewing drone surveillance footage, with emphasis on frame-by-frame inconsistencies, angle mismatches, and the appearance of drone imagery on Frank’s screen, culminating in a call for independent review of the footage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. You remember Frank Turrick who was standing to the right of Charlie and slightly behind him wearing the white hat, holding up his phone, allegedly FaceTiming his wife, his son and daughter-in-law right before Charlie was killed? I don't think that's what he was doing. In fact, I think he was monitoring drone surveillance footage, and I can prove it, allegedly. Let's get into it. Speaker 1: Anyway, on our way in, we had drone footage of the crowd building, and Charlie had it on his phone. I said, Charlie, I don't like this place. There are too many buildings. Speaker 0: So did you catch that? He said that Charlie was watching drone footage on his phone in his hand, and he puts his hand out and makes like Charlie was looking at the drone footage on his phone. So we know they had the capability of looking at drone footage on their phones. Speaker 1: I mean, they just love Charlie. So I start FaceTiming my wife and say, look at this. This is incredible. Then I start FaceTiming my son and my daughter-in-law while Charlie sits down and begins to ask questions. Speaker 0: Here you can see Frank over on Charlie's left side, and you can actually, if you look closely, you can see that he is on FaceTime. We'll zoom in here and we'll see a woman in the screen, and then we'll see the picture in picture frame of the phone camera feed in the lower right corner. So earlier on, he was actually FaceTiming somebody, and we can see that. But then he moves to the other side, to Charlie's right side behind Charlie. Speaker 1: Now this is where you may have seen an Internet conspiracy. The man in the white hat was was giving signals to the shooter. Yeah. The man in the white hat was me. Okay? I did this with my hat. Maybe I touched my nose or something while I'm holding my phone because I'm FaceTiming my son and daughter-in-law, And they're huge Charlie fans, so I'm I'm maybe 30 feet from Charlie. I'm right off his right elbow. I'm I'm standing probably just off camera if the camera's going forward, on him. Speaker 0: So they're big Charlie fans, and he's filming Charlie for the FaceTime. Right? Wrong. Look at his phone. It's not pointed at Charlie, and there's no faces in the phone. Now contrary to popular opinion, this is not a black screen or a blank screen or even a reflection. No. I'm gonna show you that he's actually getting video surveillance from what I believe is a drone, perhaps even a set of drones, and I'm gonna show you that now. It also occurs to me as I compare the two phones, I'm not even sure it's the same phone. So on the left, that's the phone he was FaceTiming with. On the right is the one where he's looking at what I think is drone surveillance footage. We're going look at that. But look at these two phones, and tell me if I'm just seeing things, but they don't quite look like the same phone. The one on the left looks a little thicker than the one on the right, and they look maybe like they might be slightly different dimensions. And the button on the phone on the right is all black, and then you have these silver looking buttons on the phone on the left, I'm not a 100% positive these are even the same phone. What do you guys think? Alright. Let's get back into it. So let's just start advancing it. So I'm gonna zoom in here. You see that? That is the front of a pickup truck that's behind them out in the parking lot. So there's the pickup truck that I'm talking about in the background. When they were walking in, you can see this white Chevy with a black grill. Okay. Look. Notice the molding and the patterning in Frank's phone and then on this pickup truck. I think that's what that is. I think that's at the front of that pickup truck. I think there's a drone flying around. Now let's just advance. Let's just advance a little bit. Let's take it frame by frame and look carefully at what's on the phone screen. Look at that. You see that? That's a car. That's a car. You can see its windows, the outline of the body, and then you can also see it looks like maybe some green trees above it. And then some, I don't know, blue or something. That looks like looks to be like a building with a spire on top or perhaps a fountain or something. You see that? So here I've pointed out those things so you can see what I'm referring to. I don't know. Maybe you see something else. I'm not sure what I'm seeing, but this is not a reflection, and it's not something in the crowd either. This is these are images. These are something else. Then this looks like it could be one of the golf carts perhaps out behind with the cloth top and the seats. You see that? See the rounded seat and the cloth top? Let's check that out. Let's take a look at these golf carts. So remember the golf carts that are out back there by the pickup truck? Well, the next image we have after the pickup truck is this thing that maybe looks like the seats and the cloth from the this golf cart. That's what I think it might be. There's a round hole, something there. I don't know what that is. See, there's no faces. Things are happening on his screen. Right? And then we have something here. Not sure what that is. It almost looks like a wheel well. See that flat curved surface? It's white and then the dark black curved surface underneath it. I'm not sure what that is. See, there's images rapidly moving on on his phone. Now he's not moving his phone. See these are not reflections. Okay? This is something happening on his phone screen. Okay. Now this is the part where I think this proves he's looking at surveillance footage from a drone. Because you're going see Danflend's arm here begin to move, and you're going to see his arm move on the screen as well. But here's the key. See that? That's his that's his arm. I think that's his arm and tattoo ink, but from an obvious different angle. That's from a different angle because Frank's phone is not pointed at Dan Flood's arm right there with the tattoo on it. Yet, he's it's showing up on his bone in perfect synchronously. Look at this. See? That's tattooing from a different angle, a different surface on Dan Flood's arm. Furthermore, you can even see the bracelet that's on Dan Flood's wrist, but it's at the wrong angle. The angle that it's showing up on Frank's phone is wrong for how his arm is laid out in relationship to the phone. Frank is getting a video feed from a different angle of Dan Flood's arm right here. Where is it coming from? From this angle, you can see that the inside of Dan Flood's arm is actually more heavily tattooed than the outside. Here's another shot from a different angle. It's a little more blurry, but you can get the point that it's more ink on the inside of his arm than on the outside of his arm, which is what we see here through Frank's phone juxtaposed against the outside of Dan's arm. This is where I think this proves that Frank Turk is seeing footage from some other camera, which I submit is probably a drone. You can see look at that. See that? You can see it happening in his phone screen. And you can see Dan Flood's arm moving, but they're from obvious different angles. Now, let's keep going. You see that? Now I'll get this next image. Right here. That's somebody's arm with a hand at the end of it. See that? That's an arm with a hand. And if we keep going, you can see that arm. It's almost like somebody's walking or standing. You see the see their two legs right here? Two legs right there, you can see the light in between them. It's a view of somebody with their arm and two legs walking or swaying back and forth or something. Then we get to the point where we get the two two white dots of light. And this is interesting because this looks like a wheel. I'm not sure exactly what that is. And now I think we're getting maybe right here, perhaps a view of Charlie tipping over. He's just been shot or killed or something's happened. And now, boom. Right there. Something white with sunlight shining on it. That might be Charlie. And now Frank is gonna take a dive and we'll see everything happen. Now let's watch the whole thing in sequence in real time. And you be the judge. You tell me what you see. Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you some credit. Do know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 0: You see this tire, my friends? Is this the same tire, hubcap, and car body that we maybe saw on Frank's phone just a few seconds prior? What do you think? Speaker 1: Now Speaker 0: let's watch that phone sequence one more time at half speed. Speaker 1: In the last ten years. How soon you're not counting game violence? Great. Speaker 0: I'd like to thank Indi Rose of the Let Me Stop You There podcast who first put me onto this. She's done her own extensive analysis of this video sequence on Frank Turek's phone. So I encourage you to go to her page, follow her, and watch her video analysis, and see where we differ. There you have it, my friends. I don't think Frank Turek was FaceTiming anybody. I think he was, and then I think he switched over to that drone footage. Perhaps it was the same feed that Charlie was using when they were first driving up. I don't know. I'm not accusing him of anything, and maybe I'm wrong. This is a possibility. This is a theory that I think needs to be looked into, so I encourage you to download the footage and look at it for yourself, and let's figure out what's going on here.
BasedSamParker
Posted - December 8, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 8:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Charlie Kirk argues authorities preemptively framed the Tyler Robinson case as the radical Left, calling it a pre-anchored narrative and comparing it to rushed post-9/11 claims. BasedSamParker responds that, while Trump and Netanyahu pushed the radical-Left frame, TPUSA insiders’ initial suspicions differed from that narrative and pointed to an alternative perspective (with a link to the source).

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK: ANCHORING THE PRE-ESTABLISHED NARRATIVE Never forget that only hours after Charlie was killed—and long before Tyler Robinson was ever known—Trump, Netanyahu and others told us who did it & why: the "ultra-progressive" "radical Left." Such narrative "pre-anchoring" is reminiscent of when the zionist media told us Osama Bin Laden & Islamic terrorism were responsible for the 9-11 attacks, ONLY MINUTES after they happened. Don't you find it odd that they told us a narrative without having any facts whatsoever, right from the jump, that has never changed or been deviated from? There wasn't even a period of "Well, we don't have any facts, yet—but as soon as we have some, we'll let you know." Nope. Instead, a day before Tyler Robinson serendipitously turned himself in, they already knew the Tyler Robinson narrative. Isn't that convenient? Anchoring. Narrative management. The first story the public hears is the one it will retain. Tell me this wasn't a propaganda operation from the start. Go ahead. Convince me.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that for years the radical left have compared Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world’s worst mass murderers, and that this rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism seen in the country today and must stop right now. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 describe the unfolding World Trade Center attacks. They say they cannot confirm that a plane hit one of the two towers, but live pictures are showing events. They report seeing another plane and state, “We just saw another one apparently go” and “into the 2nd Tower,” suggesting the second plane’s impact and calling it deliberate. They note, “Now given what has been going on around the world, some of the key suspects come to mind, Osama bin Laden. Who knows who knows what?” Speaker 3 and Speaker 4 respond to the crisis, with one expressing concern about the attackers and implying a confrontation with the culprits. Speaker 4 adds, “But he said, you can you can come and debate me. He invited that debate. He certainly didn't invite the violence,” and comments on the global nature of the problem, identifying “the people on the extremes, the Islamists, the radical Islamists, and their union with the ultra progressives.” They state that these groups “often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies.” Speaker 5 reiterates a personal, contextual stance with the line, “I'm Israeli. And I …” (implying a personal perspective on the conflict). The dialogue collectively frames the incident as a large-scale terrorist attack and discusses the broader ideological landscape, contrasting claims of human rights and free speech with the use of violence by extreme groups.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For years, those on the radical left have compared wonderful Americans like Charlie to Nazis and the world's worst mass murderers and criminals. This kind of rhetoric is directly responsible for the terrorism that we're seeing in our country today, and it must stop right now. Speaker 1: We can't confirm any of this, that a plane may have hit one of the two towers of the World Trade Center, but again, you're seeing the live pictures here. Speaker 2: There was a pilot who flew. There was another one. We just saw we just saw another one. We just saw another one apparently go another plane just flew Speaker 3: What? Speaker 2: Into the 2nd Tower. This raises this has to be deliberate, folks. Speaker 0: Well, that would begin to say that. Yeah. Speaker 2: We just saw on live television as a second plane flew into the 2nd Tower of the World Trade Center. Now given what has been going on around the world, some of the some of the key suspects come to mind, Osama bin Laden. Who knows who knows what? Speaker 4: Well, Speaker 5: big catastrophe, and I'm Israeli. And I Speaker 3: hope that now people understand what we have to deal with, the kind of people that we're dealing with on a day to day basis. Speaker 4: But he said, you can you can come and debate me. He invited that debate. He certainly didn't invite the violence, the horrible violence that tried to silence him. And, you know, this is a worldwide problem. The the people on on the, you know, on the extremes, the the Islamists, the radical Islamists, and the their union with the ultra progressives, they often speak about human rights. They speak about free speech, but they use violence to try to take down their enemies.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Never forget that while Trump & Netanyahu sang in unison that it was "the radical Left," initial suspicions from TPUSA insiders were quite different: https://t.co/JzAVOmwo5W

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is reason for people to believe that this is a professional hit job. John Salmon is an excellent reporter, and Steven Crowder has some leaked information. I want to talk about both. I want to begin by saying that I'm very, very close with Charlie and his team, and here is the thing that I wish to relay to you from them: that there is some considerable evidence that there were state actors involved here. That's it. I don't want to go any further than that. I can't go any further than that. That is all I've that is what I've been told. It is not like this is exclusive to me necessarily. John Solomon said it last night on Sean Hannity's show. Here we go. There's a sense that we all lost something important in America today, but the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, a couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. There is reason for people to believe that this is a professional hit job. John Salmon is an excellent reporter, and Steven Crowder has some leaked information. I wanna talk about both. I wanna begin by saying that I'm very, very close with Charlie and his team, And here is the thing that I here's what I wish to relay to you from them. That there is some considerable evidence that there were state actors involved here. That's it. I don't want to go any further than that. I can't go any further than that. That is all I've that is what I've been told. It is not like this is exclusive to me necessarily. John Solomon said it last night on Sean Hannity's show. Here we go. Speaker 1: And we all lost no matter what side of the political aisle you're on, we lost something important in America today. But the case goes on. The investigation goes on. There's a lot of piecing of evidence together. We don't have a shooter tonight. We have a couple leads, couple people that were released that probably aren't the shooter. They have a couple hot leads. There's a little bit of foreign intelligence. And I think over the next couple of days, we will learn a lot more, and hopefully, we will bring to justice the evil person who did what, they did to Charlie today.
BasedSamParker
Posted - December 13, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Saved - December 14, 2025 at 2:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe James Earl Ray never had a fair trial; he pled guilty quickly, and exculpatory evidence stayed hidden until the 1999 civil case that posthumously exonerated him. I see a broader operation—FBI, US military intelligence, Special Forces, NSA, ADL/B’nai B’rith, Israeli intel, the Jewish mob, the Dixie Mafia, Memphis PD. Dr. Pepper explains manipulation; a judge allegedly died after his petition. I don’t have information to forecast Tyler Robinson’s trial.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Did you know that James Éarl Ray, the alleged assassin of MLK Jr., never had a trial? He quickly pled guilty, and all the exculpatory evidence never saw the light of day (until the 1999 civil trial that basically posthumously exonerated him). That's why government, media & history books will tell you Ray was the assassin. In reality, he was just a small cog and the patsy for a sophisticated operation that involved elements from the FBI, US military intelligence, Special Forces, the NSA, the ADL/B'nai B'rith, israeli intelligence, the jewish mob, the Dixie mafia, and Memphis PD. Listen to Dr. William Pepper explain how they manipulated Ray into pleading guilty to take the fall for it all. Listen to how when Ray made a last ditch effort to get a trial, the judge mysteriously had a heart attack and was found dead with his head resting on Ray's petition. Listen to the final surprise twist. Anyway, in unrelated news, how do you think Tyler Robinson's trial will go?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over more than a decade, the speaker and James Earl Ray discussed Ray’s pursuit of post-conviction relief. Ray had pleaded guilty on March 10, 1969, and three days later, on March 13, he filed for a new trial. The central reason Ray gave for pleading guilty related to his relationship with his lawyer, Percy Foreman, who Ray said had told him he was “not a well man” and would not be able to provide his best defense. Ray claimed that the best course was to plead guilty, then obtain a new lawyer to overturn the plea. However, Ray lacked funds to hire a new attorney, so Foreman’s assistance was sought. Ray stated that Foreman offered to help him secure a different attorney by providing $500 to Jerry Ray (likely a relative or associate) to hire Robert Shapiro as counsel, and he produced a letter on Foreman’s letterhead describing this arrangement. The letter purportedly stated that Foreman would provide $500 to Jerry Ray on the condition that James Earl Ray caused no trouble at the guilty-plea hearings. Ray said he believed he was “stitch[ed] up” by the arrangement. During the guilty-plea hearing, Ray caused some agitation by challenging the concept of conspiracy, asserting that there had been a conspiracy, while Foreman reminded him that he had not been asked any question about conspiracy and told him to sit down. Ray ultimately received a sentence of 99 years. Ray filed for a new trial on March 13, and the petition was under consideration by Judge Preston Battle on March 31. Judge Battle was found dead in his office of a heart attack with the petition in hand. Tennessee law provided that when a judge dies and there is an application for a new trial, the application is automatically granted. In this case, two individuals had filed motions before Judge Battle: one proceeded to a trial, and the other did not. The speaker notes that, unsurprisingly, the one that did not receive a trial was the consequence of the judge’s death. In sum, the sequence includes Ray’s guilty plea tied to Foreman’s advice and the attempted use of funds to hire a new attorney, Ray’s assertion of conspiracy, the 99-year sentence, the March 13 petition for a new trial, and Judge Preston Battle’s death with the subsequent automatic grant implications under Tennessee law, affecting the fate of the two pending motions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And over ten years I went at this and I would talk to James off and on during those ten years. And he would ask me to represent him on appeal because he was trying to get post conviction relief. He had plead guilty in 1969 on March 10. On March 13 he filed for a new trial three days later. The reason he plead guilty was a whole series of reasons in terms of his relation with Percy Foreman, his lawyer, but the most important one he always said to me was that Percy said to him ultimately, I'm not a well man. I'm not gonna be able to give you your best defense. So what you really should do is plead guilty, and then you get a new lawyer, and you can overturn the plea. That's what you should do. And Jay said, well, I don't have any money to get a new lawyer. I don't have the confidence I can do overturn such a guilty plea process. But he said, don't worry about it. I'll give you $500. I'll take care of your lawyer. I'll give Jerry and brother $500, and can go out and hire a lawyer. Robert Shapiro. Robert Shapiro. And he put it in writing, would you believe? He wrote this letter. The person wrote this letter on his note paper. And the letter said he was giving this $500 to Jerry Ray, on the condition that James Earl Ray caused no trouble at the guilty plea hearings. He put this he put this in writing. He's a copy of the letter. So so so James, well and truly stitched up, they play on the tenth and then on the and he did cause a little bit of trouble at the guilty plea hearing after the one point. He said, what are you talking about? And he said, they talk about there not being a conspiracy. Said, I'm convinced there was a conspiracy. I'm not gonna agree. And then and foreman said, that you weren't asked any question about that, James. Sit down. And so then it went on, and and he got a sentence of ninety nine years. He filed for a new trial on the March 13. That petition was being considered by Judge Preston Battle on the March 31. He was found dead in his office of a heart attack with his head on the petition. So there were two people, when a judge dies under Tennessee law, slight nuances, but when a judge dies and there's an application for a new trial, under Tennessee law it automatically is granted. There were two people who had filed those motions before Judge Battle. One of them got a trial and one of them didn't, and you can imagine which one didn't, of course.
BasedSamParker
Posted - December 12, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Saved - December 13, 2025 at 2:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I sought the Sept 10 911 calls; Utah sent 20, but none were from the security team. There’s no record of the alleged call, and Harpole & Turek’s account of the hospital trip seems unlikely to have supported a 1–2 minute call. Did Utah lose it, misremember, or make it up? Why didn’t others call 911? Could no one have notified the hospital, risking Charlie’s life over a few minutes? I’m seeking what I missed.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK & THE MYSTERIOUS MISSING 911 CALL Brian Harpole claims they called 911 on the way to the hospital. But, when they arrived, he says the hospital didn't know they were coming. I GRAMA requested all the 911 calls from September 10th & Utah sent me 20 calls back. I was keenly interested in hearing this particular call. One problem: none of the calls were from the security team. Not only is there no record of this alleged call, but when you listen to Harpole & Frank Turek recount the hazardous hospital trip, you'll realize that it's extremely unlikely anyone in the SUV had the bandwidth or capability to even make a 911 call, which probably would have lasted 1-2 minutes MINIMUM (likely more). Maybe it's nothing. But it's one of those small, yet significant details that just doesn't seem to add up. Did Utah lose the call? Did Harpole mis-remember a 2-minute call that never happened? Did he make the story up? None of these is an attractive option. And btw, why didn't anyone else from TPUSA call 911? (Mikey McCoy called Erika Kirk, Elizabeth McCoy & Rob McCoy; Blake Neff called his mom; Terryl Farnsworth called the A/V techs back in AZ). What if nobody actually called 911? What if nobody notified the hospital? What if it had turned out that Charlie's life had hung in the balance over a few precious moments? Given there was no way for any of them to know that it didn't, I find this an egregious oversight. Watch this and let me know what you think and/or what I might have missed.

BasedSamParker
Posted - December 2, 2025 at 8:23 PM
Saved - December 2, 2025 at 11:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note the Jerusalem Post claimed Charlie Kirk died at 12:54 PM UT, 31 minutes after a shooting. Timeline: 12:23 PM start; 1 min to leave, 7–10 to hospital, 5–10 to unload and get him into OR, 20–30 in OR before pronouncement. End time 12:56–1:13 PM, after the Post’s report. Receipts are in video. What explains the discrepancy, and was there an inside man? If so, who could it be?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK HOSPITAL & DEATH PRONOUNCEMENT TIMELINE: IMPOSSIBLE! (inside man?) The Jerusalem Post reported Charlie's death at 12:54 PM Utah Time, just 31 minutes after he was shot. It's not only extremely improbable that they could have come by this information so quickly, but it's likely impossible without having an "inside man." TIMELINE START: 12:23 PM Utah Time 1) 1 minute to leave for hospital 2) 7-10 minutes to drive to hospital 3) 5-10 minutes MINIMUM to Lea unload Charlie, get him into hospital & into the OR 4) 20-30 minutes in OR before the surgeon came out & pronounced him deceased. TOTALS: 33-50 minutes END TIME: 12:56 PM-1:13 PM Utah Time—AFTER the Jerusalem Post had already announced his death. All receipts in video. Tell me what you think accounts for this discrepancy? Do you think there was an inside man? Who?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on the claim that the Jerusalem Post was first to report Charlie Kirk’s death, a mere thirty-one minutes after he was shot in Utah, and argues that such rapid publication implies inside information from someone connected to the inner circle. Key timeline details and claims: - The shooting occurred at 12:54 local Utah time. The Jerusalem Post reportedly published the death notice about thirty-one minutes later, prompting questions about how such fast reporting could occur without insider access. - Police audio indicates the transport route to the hospital was not via the freeway but on a surface street adjacent to the freeway, described as dark blue in a map photo. Under normal conditions, travel on that route would take eight to twelve minutes; the speakers claim they were traveling at high speed, estimating seven to ten minutes to reach the hospital, with the freeway alternative taking six to nine minutes. - Audio is played in which a responder notes a black SUV northbound with a passenger door open, suggesting someone may have been a victim. - The account describes a rapid, improvised medical and evacuation response. The speakers claim: they did not attempt to close the door, Justin drove aggressively, Dan was giving precise directions, and the team cut through intersections to reach the hospital. - At the hospital, the team purportedly loaded Charlie into a gurney, carried him to a room, and the speaker cut off his shirt (the “White Freedom shirt”) to allow access for a defibrillator and drugs. They claim to have interacted with staff during treatment, including pushing drugs and assisting with defibrillation. - Speaker 3 confirms that upon arrival at the hospital, Charlie initially had a pulse after treatment began; they describe praying for a miracle as doctors later said the pulse returned because Charlie was healthy, but a surgeon later declared he was dead. - A final timeline tally is presented: about one minute to load Charlie into the SUV and leave UVU; seven to ten minutes to drive to the hospital; five to ten minutes to get him into the operating room (OR). The hospital staff are described as not prepped in advance, suggesting the need to locate a gurney and assemble the team. The total time from the shooting to the doctor’s declaration of death is estimated as thirty-three to fifty minutes, with thirty-one minutes from being shot to the Jerusalem Post’s report. - The speakers argue that the tight timeline implies an inside source feeding information to the Jerusalem Post and question why Israel, not American outlets, reported the information so quickly, given that this occurred on American soil and involved an American figure. - The speakers repeatedly emphasize the implausibility of such rapid reporting without insider access and challenge the sequencing of information dissemination and the role of Israel in the initial reporting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Jerusalem Post was the first media outlet to report the death of Charlie Kirk, a mere thirty one minutes after he was shot at 12:54 local Utah time. I'm gonna take you through the full timeline now, and by the end, you're gonna see how improbable and unlikely it is that they could possibly have run this story in this time frame without inside help, likely from somebody on the inner circle. Let's get into it. Speaker 1: Over the last ten years, counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 2: Agent shots, Harvey. Speaker 0: We know from police audio that they did not take the freeway to the hospital. They took a surface street next to the freeway, which is dark blue in this map photo right here. Now, under normal circumstances, it would take somebody eight to twelve minutes to travel that route. But they were traveling at a high speed. Right? Justin was driving at high speed. We're gonna listen to them tell us that. Now, freeway would have taken six to nine minutes. So I'm gonna split the difference here because they were not on the freeway, but they were driving high speed. So I'm gonna say it took them seven to ten minutes to get to the hospital. Let's listen to that audio now. Speaker 2: Two twelve. Everybody get off the radio. I've got a black SUV northbound. I'm over in the way. Passenger door is open. Someone's trying to hang out of it. I assume this is possibly another victim. They've got one hanging out of the car. Speaker 1: And I just said go, and we didn't even attempt to close it. I told Justin, go. Go. Go. So he Speaker 2: takes Speaker 1: off. Dan's already got the route done. We know that because we've done it. And so we take off in direct action. We get out out onto the main road, and we're in slick SUV, no light sirens, and so we're breaking our own intersections. We're cutting our own traffic. We're doing everything ourselves. Justin's driving. I mean, he's, he's trained driver. I mean, that's what our guys go to driving school for just for that. It's expensive. It costs a lot, but it's a need. And so it paid off because he drove it like a champion. Dan's up in there calling out right left. This is his next turn, 20 meter, you know, 200 meters left. So he knows exactly where he's going. And so we are heading to the hospital. It's unknown. We're heading there, breaking intersections. We picked up a tail from PD somewhere along the way, and I know some audio came out about that. And I think they thought it was a secondary person that had been shot. We get to the hospital. Actually, we make it to the hospital through the traffic. We've got full wound pack in. We get out and we carry in to the door. Once we make it into the door where we see a gurney on the left hand side, we put him on a gurney and then I wheel him into a room. I start giving the patient information to the staff there. I end up getting on top of him and cutting the shirt that he had on off, that White Freedom shirt. So I cut it off so they could get to him so that I didn't articulate this to them, but I wanted to get that stuff off so they could put a defibrillator on him. And then started talking about pushing drugs. And so I was back and forth with them on drugs and defibrillator. So then, once I get that shirt off and moved out of the way, there's enough medical professionals in there. And so I just want to get out of their way. And so I got out their way and walked out of the room. And so they ended up working him in the room, and they ended up taking him to the OR because they got a pulse. They did get a pulse? They did get a pulse. Speaker 3: Now it is true. When we got to the hospital and they started working on them right away, they did get a pulse back. And so Rick and I were just everyone's praying. We're just praying for a miracle. We had a we had a small sliver of hope, and the doctor later said that we got a pulse because Charlie was a very healthy man, but the shot was catastrophic. So twenty or thirty minutes later, the surgeon came out and said he was dead. Speaker 0: So let's do the final timeline tally. The total time it took Charlie to be pronounced dead after he was shot. Number one, it took them about one minute to carry Charlie, load him into the SUV and leave UVU. Then it took about seven to ten minutes to drive to the hospital. Then it likely took a minimum of five to ten minutes to get him into the Operating Room. Now, it seems like they were not prepped ahead of time. That's why the security team had to unload Charlie, and they had to find the gurney and get him into a room and they were doing stuff. The hospital staff was not ready for him. And even in the best hospitals who keep an OR room prepped all the time, it would have taken five to ten minutes to page, you know, all the necessary people involved and get them there and scrubbed in and get Charlie wheeled in there and going after all the things that we've heard. So five to ten minutes, I feel like that's very generous. Then, according to Frank Turk, twenty to thirty minutes after they got him into the Operating Room, that's when the doctor came out. So that leaves a grand total of thirty three to fifty minutes before that doctor came out and said Charlie was dead. Now, there could have been a few minutes of overlap between the time of wheeling him into the Operating Room and getting everybody into the Operating Room and going, so there could be a few minutes there. But even so, you can still see that the timeline was extremely tight. Thirty one minutes from being shot to issuing the report in the Jerusalem Post. So they must have had somebody on the inside feeding them information. Do you know how to feed the the Jerusalem Post information? Do you know how to feed information to Reuters? How did they get this information so quickly and issued out to the public so so fast? It's very suspicious. And why Israel? Why did Israel get this information first? Why did they get it out so quickly? Why didn't any American news organizations carry this information so quickly and issue this story 31 after Charlie was shot? He's an American. This happened on American soil. Why Israel? Why was it so tightly choreographed for them?
BasedSamParker
Posted - November 23, 2025 at 3:35 AM
Saved - November 24, 2025 at 10:11 PM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BOMBSHELL: Department of Homeland Security Twitter account was set up from israel in 2008 when jewish Michael Chertoff was the DHS secretary. Once revealed, Twitter quickly removed this feature from all cabinet accounts. What's going on? @elonmusk H/T: @sneedfeedcope https://t.co/pEm7PRcF4C

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says you can tell me I'm flat, but it's not for a white guy. Back when I rapped in high school, people told me that I'm tight for a white dude. "What you don't?" I'm not white. I'm Jewish.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can tell me I'm flat, but it's not for a white guy. Back when I rapped in high school, people told me that I'm tight for a white dude. What you don't? I'm not white. I'm Jewish.
BasedSamParker
Posted - November 20, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Saved - November 21, 2025 at 5:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a critique of the Terryl Farnsworth segment: strategic omission of his “They shot Charlie” claim, misquoting him, and framing his selfie as TikTok clout while it wasn’t streamed. They reveal Farnsworth wasn’t TPUSA staff but a contractor for Visual Impulse, and they marginalize his role despite his security clearance. They frame concerns as tampering vs. documenting evidence, and offer self-serving absolution. People call for sources and FOIA.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CLOSER LOOK: The Terryl Farnsworth segment of the Brian Harpole/Shawn Ryan discussion is full of so much alleged psychological massaging, you simply have to watch it again. Here's what I noticed, and I'm interested to know what you all notice that I may have missed: STRATEGIC OMISSION: They covered Terryl Farnsworth but completely avoided any discussion of him declaring Charlie dead in the secret video recording--which is THE PRIMARY BOMBSHELL in Farnsworth's video. MISQUOTING: They actually get Terryl's quote wrong. Farnsworth said "They shot Charlie," not "Charlie's been shot." Small, but oh-so-BIG difference. MISDIRECTION: Why did they frame his secret selfie as a kind of TikTok "clout posting" when the video wasn't streamed or posted? It's a false framing that implants an incorrect characterization into the minds of the watchers. It feels like an effort to absolve Terryl of something rather than a quest for truth. NEW REVELATIONS: Terryl Farnsworth doesn't actually work for TPUSA as everyone has assumed, rather he worked for a company called Visual Impulse (VI) that TPUSA contracted. Why did TPUSA let that false assumption stand for so long? MARGINALIZATION: They never uttered Terryl Farnsworth's name, and to listen to Brian, you'd think he barely knew who Terryl was--odd since Terryl had security clearance to be inside the "no-go" zone. Is Brian accountable for anything under his security purview?! STRAW MAN: People didn't just object to Farnsworth because he might have deleted or destroyed the footage, which is how Brian & Shawn framed it, they objected to him illegally tampering with the crime scene and possibly destroying critical forensic evidence like the camera placement. SELF-ABSOLUTION: "It's not for me to understand..." Gotcha, Brian. The stairs, the Sorenson Center, the Losee Center, the drones, the rooftops--people inside the perimeter--none of that's your job. Above your pay grade? SMH! Remember: @RealCandaceO reported that Terryl Farnsworth doesn't normally handle these kinds of events, and that he admitted to her "they were trying something new that day." (Indeed, Farnsworth wasn't at the follow-up Utah event on September 30th) Tell me what you see here, and leave a like and a retweet for the algo, please, so that we can crowdsource this. I feel like there is more going on here. Leave no stone unturned. (BTW: I ascribe no guilt to anyone here, I'm just looking at all the details and seeing where they lead)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 describes a man on the team who, after he was shot, runs toward the vehicles, stays outside the vehicles, and films a TikTok selfie video. They ask to identify this person, and it is confirmed to be the audio-visual (AV) team member who runs the cameras. This individual is said to have said, “Charlie just got shot,” and is the same person associated with the footage and the AV setup contracted to shoot the coverage. Speaker 0 clarifies that this person works for a company called VI, which provides contract AV/video personnel, and is not a security guy. He is the AV team member who runs the cameras. He also is described as the person who “took down the cameras” and there were questions about what happened to the footage, noting that this is a legitimate inquiry. Speaker 1 adds that after the event, someone goes to the camera behind Charlie, pulls the camera down, and it looks like they pull the SD card out; this footage is in the hands of the FBI and was not deleted or erased. The SD card was pulled by someone named Senga, and the footage ended up with the FBI. Speaker 0 reiterates that the AV person works for VI, the video contracting company, not as security. He expresses confusion about the phone usage and states that it’s not for him to understand that part; he observes that, in tragic events, people pull their phones out instead of running, and says that’s for the AV person to explain. He notes that the AV person does not work for them, but from what he has seen, this is the same person who took down the cameras, prompting legitimate questions about where that footage went. He confirms that the person was interviewed by the FBI, asked questions, and that all relevant material was turned over.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't I I don't understand, and and it's not for me to try to understand that part. Speaker 1: There was a man on the team who, after he was shot, I believe he was on the security team, runs towards the vehicles, hangs out outside the vehicles and takes, I believe it was a TikTok selfie video. Do you know who this is? Mm-mm. Can you pull this up, Jeremy? Speaker 0: Is it the one where he said, Charlie just got shot? Yeah. Yeah. He's with the audio visual team. Yeah. It's a company that they contract to shoot the footage. It's also the one he's the guy that went up and and here he is right here. Yep. Yep. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. I can tell you. Yeah. He's the one that if you see him, he's one that's running the cameras. Okay. Yeah. He he's the audio visual team guy that's running the cameras. He's also the one that they said that he was hiding footage or whatever, that he turned over all that footage to the FBI. Speaker 1: This is also the guy that, or was that a security guy? If you look after the event, somebody goes to the camera that was behind Charlie, pulls the camera down. Senga. Looks like he pulls the SD card Speaker 0: out. Senga. Speaker 1: And that footage is in the hands of the FBI. Correct. Wasn't deleted, wasn't erased. Speaker 0: He actually works for a company called VI, and they do their contract AV video people. He's not a security guy. He works for the VI, the video companies. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Yeah. And so I don't understand. It's not for me to try to understand that part. Like the getting on the phone or that. I don't understand that. And you see that a lot nowadays. Tragic things happen. Shootouts and people pull their phones out instead of running. And so I don't understand that. That's for him to explain, not me. I know he doesn't work for us. But I also know from seeing some of the stuff that he's the same guy that took down the cameras and people are like, what's going on here? And I'm like, well, that's a legitimate ask. That's a legitimate ask. Speaker 1: I think that too. Don't think that's Speaker 0: That's a legitimate ask. And where did that go? And he was interviewed and asked and answered, an FBI, and that was all turned over because I asked that question.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Terryl Farnsworth doesn't work at TPUSA, he's a contractor. https://t.co/OGsjQ5XfhZ https://t.co/RVP2YIBDaZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that investigating a matter involving someone they know is challenging, noting small discrepancies that might not alarm the general public. A key early clue was Terrell Farnsworth’s presence at the event, despite his usual role at the top of the company handling large events (SaaS, AmFest) and not typically attending college campus events. Terrell claimed they were trying something new that day, but the approach seemed so new that it lasted only until the next event after Charlie died, at which point Terrell was not present again. Terrell did, however, secure the SD cards at that event. The speaker emphasizes that this is a detail that would not necessarily be seen as concrete by the broader audience, but it stood out as an anomaly to them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna let you guys know right now that it is difficult to investigate a matter, especially when it involves a person that you know, because there are minor things that I immediately noticed that were off or unlikely that would not have necessarily alarmed the general public. For example, one of the earliest alarms that went off for me was the fact that Terrell Farnsworth, the guy who takes out the SD cards, was there at all. Okay? Terrell does not do college campus events. He doesn't do that. He's at the top of the company. He does the big events, the SaaS, the AmFest. He does not do college events. But, of course, he told me they were trying something new that day. And it must have been so new that it was over by the next event after Charlie died because he wasn't there again. So he just, out of the blue, was at this event, and then he wasn't, and he secured the SD cards. Okay? It was something that I noticed that the rest of the world would not have taken as a concrete fact.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mia_Stretch Exactly. It came across to me as if he was feigning ignorance. Meanwhile they COMPLETELY IGNORED the part where Terryl said Charlie was dead. WHAT?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Trillion0x Their brother Bryan Farnsworth is also involved as well as producing the Charlie Kirk show

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@_Jayd3d Yeah, telling us to FOIA it makes it look like he's on our side with nothing to hide.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Jonsey_8 That's the one thing they ignored!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GrokFact Link me sources, please

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@JimRobe30722278 Everybody's been calling it out, including Candace on her show yesterday.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@TarinMccoy No see here, I'd trust him to flush my goldfish. lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@HeartGuardener I need to do video stream commenting like Baron. Of course, it would be nowhere near as good as Baron! He's tremendous.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@norgaloki Chief of staff doing grunt work that they're paying someone else to do? Kinda weird.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Muhkeezy If it's psyops, that's WHY I have to watch it. LOL

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@targirl81 @realbaronpod!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@NewClearWiz Unironically, I would love to go back to 1985. What a time to be alive.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LaylaJo10575948 Softball is never a satisfying substitute for real baseball.

BasedSamParker
Posted - November 13, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Saved - November 14, 2025 at 4:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m being sued for $5 million over journalism tweets and am asking for contributions to my legal defense at GiveSendGo.com/DefendSamParker. Post 2 repeats the request; Posts 3–16 are thanks to various supporters and followers who’ve acknowledged or tagged others. I’m grateful for the encouragement and donations from Mike, Simon, Maze, Evan, Kash Patel’s girlfriend, and many others.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CALL TO ACTION: I'm being sued for $5 million for journalism tweets. Please contribute whatever you can to my legal defense fund and help me beat back this attack on free speech & effort to silence all of us. Like, comment, retweet! DONATE HERE : GiveSendGo.com/DefendSamParker https://t.co/0XQ7RtrMxb

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Please help! And God bless! Givesendgo.com/DefendSamParker

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Vltra_MK @TheOfficial1984 Thanks, Mike!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@xIsraelExposedx 🔥 https://t.co/Zl1Xi5d7G0

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ReturnOfKappy Thanks, bro.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@truthtroll_X You're a G

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@goddeketal Thanks, Simon!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@MazeLove14 Thanks, Maze

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@propandco Thank you!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@RedPillMediaX Thanks, buddy

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Intrepidus_Ibe Thank you

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Rissajohns The girlfriend of Kash Patel, director of the FBI

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@EvanAKilgore Thanks, Evan

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Truthtellerftm Thanks, truth

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ZVRIIIrd 🫡

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@doctor_rahmeh Thank you for your support

BasedSamParker
Posted - November 10, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Saved - November 10, 2025 at 7:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that texts obtained from UVU via GRAMA show planning to pave over the crime scene began as early as Saturday, 9/13 and was done on the fly. It was not a previously scheduled job as we were told. Why did UVU lie, and who decided to pave over a fresh crime scene so quickly?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKING: Texts obtained from UVU via GRAMA request show that the planning to pave over the crime scene began as early as Saturday, 9/13, & was done on the fly. It was NOT a previously scheduled job as we were originally told. Why did UVU lie? And who was responsible for deciding to pave over a fresh crime scene so quickly?

@CamelotJack1963 - Camelot Jack

@ProjectConstitu Construction crew "well trained in keeping quiet" What exactly were they to "keep quiet"??? https://t.co/QauBxIVX4A

BasedSamParker
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 12:10 AM
Saved - November 3, 2025 at 7:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I thread through posts accusing Alexis Wilkins of either “working for” or “doing work for” spies: Marissa Streit of PragerU, Abe Hamadeh, Mike Flynn, and Kash Patel as her boyfriend. The posts say she’s Kash’s girlfriend, a press secretary, and a PragerU contributor who met Kash at a Flynn-run ReAwaken America event. They question who she works for, link her to intel figures, and urge scrutiny of her background and ties.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

ALEXIS WILKINS, KASH PATEL UPDATE: Kash Patel's celebutante/actress girlfriend has recently claimed on Instagram that "I do not work for a spy....I make content for their platform." Get it? She doesn't work for them, she just does work for them. Quality hair splitting. But, let's examine this non-spy claim further, shall we? Thread: 1/

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ The "spy" in question is Marissa Streit, the CEO of PragerU. Marissa is absolutely a spy, as she moved to israel, joined the IDF, and worked in the military intelligence Unit 8200, which is similar to the US's NSA. What Marissa knows, and what other jews know—but perhaps count on YOU Gentiles not knowing—is that Marissa has sworn an oath to give her life in the defense of israel.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Alexis really wants you to know that she "does work for" (not "works for") PragerU. She announces it on all her socials. https://t.co/Bw7fYVCvim

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ So, yes, Alexis does work for an israeli spy. But that's not the only spy in this story. No no. Enter Congressman Abe Hamadeh of Arizona. He's a "former" captain in the US Army's Military Intelligence Corps. Alexis is his Press Secretary, even though he represents AZ & she lives in Tennessee. I wonder, does Alexis work for him, or does she just do work for him? 🤔

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ But wait, there's more. Why is Alexis Wilkins even on our radar? Well, it's because she dates Kash Patel, the Director of the FBI. So that's a 3rd Intelligence operative, if you're counting at home. Note how they met, at a "ReAwaken America" event. https://t.co/iOPB1IBlOZ

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ The ReAwaken America event where she met Kash Patel was put on by General Mike Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and founder of the Flynn Intel Group. Here's a picture of Alexis from just 3 weeks after the event. This is the "devout Christian" that just couldn't resist the cross-eyed Hindu 18 years her senior. Surely, The Fates recoil at the thought of her not attending the event and just happening to get swept off her feet by Kash Patel. Shall we count Mike Flynn as a 4th Intelligence operative in our cast of characters? One wonders if she either "works for," or "does work for" the General? Hmmmm.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Finally, Alexis insists that we should take a message from what she posts about AND what she does NOT post about. Okay, Ms. Wilkins, let's just take a look at what you're NOT posting about. Interesting! https://t.co/FSJU3Bs4bI

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Who did Epstein work for? Who does Alexis Wilkins work for? Or maybe she doesn't work for them, she just does work for them...sometimes. https://t.co/7MKRhgxxom

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ Kash Patel says Alexis Wilkins has done more for this nation than most of us will in 10 lifetimes! What does he know that we don't? Lol Meanwhile, those of us who want the Epstein Files & transparency in the Charlie Kirk investigation are just internet anarchists. Whatever that even means. Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ What do you think, internet friends, is it fair to question who Alexis Wilkins is? Is she just Kash Patel's girlfriend and a country music artist? Does she work for spies? Did you know she grew up in Hollywood? Who is Alexis Wilkins? https://t.co/Bp1UEpNAhX

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

11/ If you enjoy my content & wish to support my work since Twitter demonetized me & stripped away my paid subscribers, please follow this link: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

12/ Here's my previous investigation into the background of Alexis Wilkins: https://t.co/5ls0IKYKaL

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵1/ WHO IS ALEXIS WILKINS--Girlfriend of Kash Patel? Alexis Wilkins was a devout 24-yr old Christian when she met Kash Patel, a 42-yr old Hindu Muslim & started dating him. Now he's the FBI director. She's also the press secretarty for Abraham Hamadeh, a Syrian Muslim member of the US House of Representatives from Arizona, and a "former" member of US Military Intelligence. ▪️She's also a country music singer based out of Nashville. ▪️She works for PragerU, is tight with The Daily Wire, & has ties to TPUSA ▪️She hosts her own news & political commentary show on Rumble. Let's take a closer look at Alexis, pictured here 3 weeks after meeting Kash Patel in 2022.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

13/ Final Tally: ▪️Does work for 1 spy, Marissa Streit ▪️Works for another spy, Abe Hamadeh ▪️Dates an intel operative ▪️Was possibly set up with Kash by another intel operative That's a lot of coincidences.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

14/ Now, go wish Alexis a big happy birthday, today! https://t.co/4AFCqRBJzV

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

The very first tweet Alexis Wilkins ever posted was today, on her 13th birthday--the day she could finally be on Twitter. But as you can see, she didn't get any love. Please join me in respectfully wishing her happy birthday & giving her the warm Twitter welcome she never got! https://t.co/p3yu7pNtBG

@AlexisWilkins - Alexis Wilkins

Thanks for the birthday wishes!! So happy! Xoxo

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@HussainShafiei o7

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@IanCarrollShow Imagine claiming you don't work for a spy, when you actually work for 2. Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@slave_2_liberty o7 bro

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@USA1stsb7 Verdict? Works for, or just does work for?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@MannieOwn Damn straight. We're watching.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@1776coldbeers 😉🤫🤭

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@mrlourage Freudian slip? Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@TaraskaWindland Do you want me to answer? Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@truth_finder40 In the threads

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@tardyhard Ask, a gentleman of refinement

BasedSamParker
Posted - November 1, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Saved - November 1, 2025 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that two mysterious Egyptian planes shadowing my TPUSA events fly in and out of Cairo, including on the day of the assassination. Across 37 miles away, Inshas Airbase hosts Egypt’s El Sa'ka Forces, trained by the US Delta Force, SEALs, and SAS. Could this involve foreign involvement Kash Patel wants investigated? If you have flight tips, send them to Candace Owens or me, and please comment and retweet for reach.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK UPDATE: The 2 mysterious Egyptian planes shadowing Charlie Kirk & TPUSA events over the last 2 years, including the day of the assassination—as reported by @RealCandaceO yesterday—consistently fly in & out of Cairo, Egypt. Here's why that might be more interesting than you realize: Just 37 miles away from Cairo is Inshas Airbase, the home & primary training center for the El Sa'ka Forces, or "Thunderbolts"—Egypt's elite special operations unit patterned after the US Army Rangers, and trained by the US Delta Force, US Navy SEALS & British SAS. The unit, established in 1953, focuses on airborne insertions, raids & unconventional warfare. Is this some of that foreign involvement Kash Patel doesn't want being investigated? If you have any information on these flights, from anywhere in the world, please send your tips to Candace Owens (or me). Thank you. Everyone else, please comment & retweet this for maximum reach.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 29, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Saved - October 29, 2025 at 10:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I state I ruled out exploding mic and palm gun theories; a high-velocity round caused cavitation, tearing the necklace and shirting, with a white puff explained and a shirt swoosh noted. A better render appeared, video issues discussed, and the path forward focused on identifying the round and angles. No vest; shockwave travels ~1500 m/s, milliseconds total, with dozens of foot-pounds tearing the necklace. Squib denied; Charlie’s dead.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

MOMENT OF IMPACT: Today I'm definitively ruling out the exploding mic theory & the palm gun theory. Charlie Kirk was killed with a high velocity round that created a cavitation shockwave that burst his necklace in half. My breakdown accounts for the weird shirt swoosh, the "puff of white smoke," and even the "shrapnel." Watch this & leave me your feedback. We'll cover this in today's space, including other details about the mysterious necklace.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round that created a high pressure shock wave propagating at 1,500 meters per second through his body. This shock wave ripped his gold necklace in half and contributed to killing him. The analysis argues there was no exploding microphone and that some video artifacts can be explained by the rapid sequence of events occurring in milliseconds. The initial shock wave travels at 1,500 m/s and violently yanks the necklace backwards and slightly upward, as Kirk’s neck juts out to the back. The necklace, still under the shirt, is later launched forward a split second later as the shock wave reaches the front. The pendant junction shears the chain due to differential forces acting on the chain and pendant. The right half of the necklace is torn away from the pendant junction and whips around Kirk’s head above his ear due to the backward and slightly upward force. The pendant remains attached to the left half of the necklace and is thrown slightly forward into the shirt and upward over his left shoulder by the frontward expansion of the shock wave, which is not captured in that camera exposure, creating a swooshing projection seen in the next angle. The shock wave undulates down his back, indicating it is not uniform in timing, duration, or magnitude. It propagates around in an undulating manner: out the back, down the back, then forward into the chest and upward. This differential force along the length of the necklace, in contact with the body, leads to the tearing. The left half of the necklace with the pendant attached swooshes upward over the left shoulder; the right side of the chain is whipped around Kirk’s head, as seen in the prior frame. The middle panel shows Kirk’s body ballooned, with the neck expanded, resembling a donut-like inflation around the upper chest, interpreted as cavitation shockwave traveling through the body cavity. This is not uniform: the shock wave went out the back first, then a split second later out the front, imparting force on the pendant to the front and upward, opposing the force on the necklace going backward, contributing to the tearing and the swooping motions. A white smear in the middle panel, pointed to by a green arrow, is not smoke or vapor from a mic explosion. It is a double exposure: the shock wave’s speed causes the shirt to move so quickly that the camera exposure cannot keep up, producing a double exposure and motion blur. The middle panel’s double gold line is two chains forming a V due to the double exposure; in reality, there is one chain, with the right side whipped around the head and the left side still caught in the shirt, the pendant acting like a grappling hook inside the shirt. The video shows a possible exploding lapel mic claim, but the analysis notes that the mic is still attached after the shirt jerks and rebounds, not entering the neck. A small black dot is identified as the lapel mic and remains in place. The white projectile at the end is identified as spit or sweat ejected from the body due to the shock wave, not gang violence. In summary, the account asserts Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round into the neck and body cavity, creating a 1,500 m/s shock wave that tore the necklace and caused the observed motions; there was no exploding mic or palm gun, and artifacts in the video are explained by rapid movement and double exposure. The presenter invites feedback and corrections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round that created a significant high pressure shock wave that undulated and reverberated through his body at 1,500 meters per second. It was this high velocity shock wave that ripped his gold necklace in half and contributed to killing him. I'm also going to explain how there was no exploding mic and how some of the other things you've seen in the videos can be explained as artifacts resulting from this really rapid sequence of events that probably only took five, ten, fifteen milliseconds to happen. They are not counting game violence. Great. Okay. The initial shockwave travels at 1,500 meters per second and quickly and violently yanks the necklace backwards and slightly upward. You can see that here as his neck is jutting out to the back. Now, the necklace is still under the shirt and in a sequence not captured here, will also be launched forward a split second later as the shock wave reaches the front. The necklace is sheared in half at the pendant junction due to sudden differential forces acting differently on the chain and the pendant. Similar to how toilet paper will tear off the roll, which has more mass, if you yank on it too quickly. Next, what we see is the right half of the necklace has indeed been torn from the pendant junction and is whipping around Charlie's head above his ear. And that's due to the backward and slightly upward force that was applied that we just saw in the previous picture. Now, the pendant itself is still attached to the left half of the necklace, and it is also thrown slightly forward into the shirt and upward over his left shoulder by the ballooning shockwave expansion in the front, which is not captured by this particular camera exposure. And this creates that weird swooshing projection seen in the next angle. I'd also like to point out that the shock wave is undulating down his back. And this just reminds us that this shock wave is not uniform. It's not traveling uniform throughout his body in timing or in duration or even in magnitude. Okay, it's propagating around this undulation manner. It's out the back, it's down his back, and then it's moving forward into his chest and upwards. And so the necklace is experiencing differential forces along its entire length where it's in contact with the body. So this is another angle of what we just saw. You can see that the left half of the necklace with the pendant still attached has swooshed up upwards and over his left shoulder. And what the camera could not capture here was the right side of the chain, which is being whipped around his head, we saw in the last photo. Okay, there's a lot of things to recognize from this sequence of events. Let's first address the middle panel. You see how Charlie's body is ballooned out? You can see his neck has expanded. And it looks like he's wearing like a a donut life preserver that's like inflated around his upper chest. This is the cavitation shockwave traveling throughout his body cavity, but of course, as I pointed out previously, this did not happen uniformly. In this exposure, because it happened so fast, it looks like it's just one big poof in a ring. But it actually was this undulation, right? So that's one thing I want you to be aware of. First, the shock wave went out the back, and then just a split second later, it was going out the front. And that was imparting a force on the pendant to Charlie's front, but also upwards. And that was in opposition to the shockwave force that had already been imparted onto the necklace going backwards, just a split moment before that. So it has these opposing forces. Right? And that's what helps shear the and tear the gold chain from the pendant. Okay? And this is what's going to send that, again, that right half of the chain up around Charlie, whip it around his head, and then it's going to send the pendant end of the chain up to the left, which is why you get this swooping motion up over his left shoulder. The other really important thing to note from this is, you see that white smear in the middle panel that the green arrow is pointing to? People have said, that looks like smoke. That looks like vapor. We think that that is the lapel mic exploding. That's not what that is. What it actually is, is a double exposure. Because again, remember, this shock wave that's propagating through Charlie's body is moving at 1,500 meters per second. Okay. That's really fast. The shirt is moving really, really quickly. It's hitting hitting that lapel mic, and it's moving quickly. And what we have is a classic double exposure. The shirt has moved, and the camera cannot keep up with it. The camera speed can't keep up with it, and so you're getting a double exposure. And if you look around Charlie to all those different arrows, you'll see in that middle panel that there is indeed blur happening everywhere. And that's motion blur from the speed of the shirt movement. Okay. So there's a few things to note from this latest angle that I've shown you. First of all, you see that double gold line? It looks like two chains forming a v pointing at Charlie's back. Well, that's actually one chain, again, in a double exposure cause it's moving so quickly. It's been double exposed, so it looks like there's two, but there's really only one. And what's happened here is the that's the right side of the chain that's whipped around his head. The left side is still caught in his shirt, like the pendant's acting like a little grappling hook inside his shirt, keeping the chain hooked inside of there. That's what's happening. And you can see that the gold chain indeed is dangling down off of Charlie from just underneath his shirt above his left shoulder there. And let's watch that video one more time and you'll see what I'm talking about. But let's take one more look at the possible exploding mic. I want you to notice that after the shirt jerk and the shirt rebounds back, that that little black dot, that lapel mic, is still attached. It has not entered his neck and and killed him, as some people have claimed. Take a look. Open the line. Stay down. I'll say we're not counting gangbuns. Great. There's the mic, still attached, has not entered his neck. Finally, there's the matter of this little white projectile. What is that? Well, that's spit, I think. It's spit or sweat that's been ejected from Charlie's body as a result of the shock wave. Not counting gang violence. Great. So there you have it. That's what happened to Charlie. He was hit with a high velocity round, I think in the neck down into his body cavity, which created that undulating shockwave traveling through his body at 1,500 meters per second that blew apart his necklace, swung it around his head, and left us with the video evidence we have now. There was no exploding mic. Okay. There was no palm gun. Palm gun can't impart that kind of kinetic energy to create that kind of shock wave. So he was hit with a high velocity round into the neck, down into the body cavity, and that's what killed him. That's what killed Charlie Kirk. One final note, you don't see the lapel mic here in this exposure, because poor camera quality. It's just a poor quality exposure, but it's there. We saw it in the earlier video segment that had a higher quality camera recording it. What do you think? What do you think of my explanation? Was it clear? What problems did you find? I think it makes sense, but maybe I messed something up. So let me know in the comments. Reach out to me. Let me know what I got wrong or what we need to change or add.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Here's a better render. Dunno what happened above. Same video, looks better. https://t.co/z8O1ZI31zH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round that created a significant high pressure shock wave traveling at 1,500 meters per second, which ripped his gold necklace in half and contributed to killing him. There was no exploding mic, and some observed effects in the videos are artifacts of the rapid sequence of events, likely occurring in five to fifteen milliseconds. The initial shock wave travels at 1,500 meters per second and violently yanks the necklace backwards and slightly upward, as Kirk’s neck juts out to the back. The necklace, still under the shirt, will be launched forward a split second later as the shock wave reaches the front. The pendant junction shears the necklace in half due to differential forces acting on the chain and pendant, similar to tearing toilet paper off a roll when yanked too quickly. The right half of the necklace is torn from the pendant junction and whips around Kirk’s head above his ear due to the backward and slightly upward force. The pendant remains attached to the left half of the necklace and is thrown slightly forward into the shirt and upward over his left shoulder by the front shockwave expansion not captured in that camera exposure, creating a swooshing projection seen in the next angle. The shock wave undulates down his back, indicating it is not uniform and propagates around the body in varying timing, duration, and magnitude. This differential forcing along the necklace’s contact with the body contributes to the tearing. Another angle shows the left half of the necklace with the pendant still attached swooshing upward over the left shoulder; the right side of the chain is whipped around Kirk’s head, as seen previously. The middle panel shows Kirk’s body ballooning outward, with the neck expanded as if wearing a donut-shaped life preserver around the upper chest. This cavitation shockwave travels through the body cavity, but the effect is not uniform. The back shock wave goes out first, then the front, imparting opposing forces that help tear the chain and move the pendant. A white smear in the middle panel, pointed to by a green arrow, was claimed by some to be smoke or vapor; it is not smoke. It is a double exposure: the shock wave moves the shirt so fast that the camera exposure creates a double image, and motion blur is present around Kirk due to the rapid movement. The double exposure explains a white streak and the apparent dual gold lines; that is the right side of the chain whipped around the head while the left side remains caught in the shirt, with the pendant acting like a grappling hook inside the shirt. There is no palm gun or exploding mic. The little black dot is the lapel mic, which remains attached and does not enter the neck. A white projectile observed is spit or sweat ejected from the body due to the shock wave. The overall claim is that Kirk was hit with a high-velocity round in the neck down into the body cavity, creating a fast-moving shock wave that tore the necklace, swung it around, and produced the observed video artifacts and motions. The speaker invites feedback, asking what others think and what might be wrong or missing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie Kirk was hit by a high velocity round that created a significant high pressure shock wave that undulated and reverberated through his body at 1,500 meters per second. It was this high velocity shock wave that ripped his gold necklace in half and contributed to killing him. I'm also going to explain how there was no exploding mic and how some of the other things you've seen in the videos can be explained as artifacts resulting from this really rapid sequence of events that probably only took five, ten, fifteen milliseconds to happen. They're not counting game violence. Great. Okay, the initial shockwave travels at 1,500 meters per second and quickly and violently yanks the necklace backwards and slightly upward. You can see that here as his neck is jutting out to the back. Now, the necklace is still under the shirt and in a sequence not captured here, will also be launched forward a split second later as the shock wave reaches the front. The necklace is sheared in half at the pendant junction due to sudden differential forces acting differently on the chain and the pendant. Similar to how toilet paper will tear off the roll if you yank on it too quickly. Next what we see is the right half of the necklace has indeed been torn from the pendant junction and is whipping around Charlie's head above his ear. And that's due to the backward and slightly upward force that was applied that we just saw in the previous picture. Now, the pendant itself is still attached to the left half of the necklace, and it is also thrown slightly forward into the shirt and upward over his left shoulder by the ballooning shockwave expansion in the front, which is not captured by this particular camera exposure. And this creates that weird swooshing projection seen in the next angle. I'd also like to point out that the shock wave is undulating down his back. And this just reminds us that this shock wave is not uniform. It's not traveling uniform throughout his body in timing or in duration or even in magnitude. Okay, it's sort of, it's propagating around this undulation manner. It's out the back, it's down his back, then it's moving forward into his chest and upwards. And so the necklace is experiencing differential forces along its entire length where it's in contact with the body. So this is another angle of what we just saw. You can see that the left half of the necklace with the pendant still attached has swooshed up upwards and over his left shoulder. And what the camera could not capture here was the right side of the chain, which is being whipped around his head, we saw in the last photo. Okay. There's a lot of things to recognize from this sequence of events. Let's first address the middle panel. You see how Charlie's body is ballooned out? You can see his neck has expanded, and it looks like he's wearing like a donut life preserver that's like inflated around his upper chest. This is the cavitation shockwave traveling throughout his body cavity, but of course, as I pointed out previously, this did not happen uniformly. In this exposure, because it happened so fast, it looks like it's just one big poof in a ring. But it actually was this undulation, right? So that's one thing I want you to be aware of. First, the shock wave went out the back, and then just a split second later, it was going out the front. And that was imparting a force on the pendant to Charlie's front, but also upwards. And that was in opposition to the shockwave force that had already been imparted onto the necklace going backwards, just a split moment before that. So it has these opposing forces. Right? And that's what helps shear the and tear the gold chain from the pendant. Okay? And this is what's going to send that, again, that right half of the chain up around Charlie, whip it around his head, and then it's going to send the pendant end of the chain up to the left, which is why you get this swooping motion up over his left shoulder. The other really important thing to note from this is, you see that white smear in the middle panel that the green arrow is pointing to? People have said, that looks like smoke. That looks like vapor. We think that that is the lapel mic exploding. That's not what that is. What it actually is, is a double exposure. Because again, remember this shock wave that's propagating through Charlie's body is moving at 1,500 meters per second. Okay, that's really fast. The shirt is moving really, really quickly. It's hitting that lapel mic, and it's moving quickly, and what we have is a classic double exposure. The shirt has moved, and the camera cannot keep up with it. The camera speed can't keep up with it, and so you're getting a double exposure. And if you look around Charlie to all those different arrows, you'll see in that middle panel that there is indeed blur happening everywhere, and that's motion blur from the speed of the shirt movement. Silence. Great. Okay. So there's a few things to note from this latest angle that I've shown you. First of all, you see that double gold line? It looks like two chains forming a v pointing at Charlie's back. Well, that's actually one chain, again, in a double exposure, because it's moving so quickly. It's been double exposed, so it looks like there's two, but there's really only one. And what's happened here is the that's the right side of the chain that's whipped around his head. The left side is still caught in his shirt, like the pendant's acting like a little grappling hook inside his shirt, keeping the chain hooked inside of there. That's what's happening. And you can see that the gold chain indeed is dangling down off of Charlie from just underneath his shirt above his left shoulder there. And let's watch that video one more time, and you'll see what I'm talking about. But let's take one more look at the possible exploding mic. I want you to notice that after the shirt jerk and the shirt rebounds back, that that little black dot, that lapel mic, is still attached. It has not entered his neck and and killed him as some people have claimed. Take a look. The last 10 piece. Down ticker not counting game finals. There's the mic, still attached, has not entered his neck. Finally, there's the matter of this little white projectile. What is that? Well, that's spit, I think. It's spit or sweat that's been ejected from Charlie's body as a result of the shock wave. Not counting gang violence. Great. So there you have it. That's what happened to Charlie. He was hit with a high velocity round, I think in the neck down into his body cavity, which created that undulating shockwave traveling through his body at 1,500 meters per second that blew apart his necklace, swung it around his head, and left us with the video evidence we have now. There was no exploding mic. Okay. There was no palm gun. Palm gun can't impart that kind of kinetic energy to create that kind of shock wave. So he was hit with a high velocity round into the neck, down into the body cavity, and that's that's what killed him. That's what killed Charlie Kirk. One final note, you don't see the lapel mic here in this exposure, because it's poor camera quality. It's just a poor quality exposure, but it's there. We saw it in the earlier in the earlier video segment that had a higher quality camera recording it. What do you think? What do you think of my explanation? Was it clear? What problems did you find? I think it makes sense, but maybe I messed something up. So let me know in the comments. Reach out to me. Let me know what I got wrong or what we need to change or add.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

There's no exploding mic. There's no shirt singe. There's no hole. It remains intact. The white shmear is double exposure motion blur. The mic is intact at the end on the high quality video. I won't be entertaining that anymore. You have to know when to rule things out. As for the round, the challenge will now be to figure out what kind of round and at what angles it would be possible. The amount of overpressure we see without an exit wound is intriguing and a little bizarre.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@sull Yes, but then you're left with: what caused the massive shockwave that undulated through his neck and torso? A bullet.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@arguably_angela It was torn in half. The right side end whipped around while the left side pendant stayed in the shirt like a grappling hook.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@BlakeBednarz Still need those wetransfers, bro. I'm working with substandard video here. Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@wiseguyinsider No, it doesn't. Palm gun theory is riddled with problems. It's just silly at this point.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@PulstBarba2881 There was no vest. It's been confirmed 6 ways from Sunday.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@DorthyTayl6853 That's the end of the necklace that indeed remains inside the shirt, so I'm not sure what point you're making. The free end is what whipped around.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@alsacetx The shockwave is traveling 1500 m/s. The whole thing is over in milliseconds. Several dozen foot-pounds are imparted onto the necklace, tearing it in half.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@HunterV97 Cope and seethe

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@kolby111169 It's clearly the necklace and the left shoulder swoosh is due to the pendant being thrown up into the shirt on the other side. You're overcomplicating it. https://t.co/ypcLODGr37

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Jim147909076807 There was no squib. Charlie's dead.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 23, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Saved - October 27, 2025 at 8:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m blunt: Mikey McCoy walked away on the phone before Charlie Kirk’s body hit the ground—before blood, security, or the crowd reacted. He stayed on the call as they loaded Charlie into the SUV, likely unaware of Charlie’s status or what happened behind him. What was he told, who was he talking to, and why would that call matter more than tending to Charlie?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Let's be REAL clear: Mikey McCoy walked away & was on the phone before Charlie Kirk's body even hit the ground—before blood started pouring out, before security reached Charlie, and before most of the crowd had even reacted, yet! What's more, he was still on the phone walking away as they loaded Charlie into the SUV. Because of his quick flight, he couldn't have known if Charlie was alive or dead—and, from what we can see, he didn't even know what was going on behind him at all. In fact, how could Mikey have known anything useful or relevant at this point? He would have been totally oblivious to any of the developments. What value or insight could he have possibly provided to anyone on the phone? NONE. Tell me what I'm missing. What plausibly explains this? Am I the only one who wants to know who Mikey was talking to and what about? How could that phone call have been more important than tending to Charlie in his most desperate hour?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: @scootie_84 & @GtgTrinity4205

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 appears to be trying to move the conversation along, indicating a desire to shift focus and figure out what happened. The scene then shifts to a visual moment that draws attention: “Wow. Look at that. Beautiful. Look at that,” suggesting a notable or striking image or location. The core narrative centers on Mikey McCoy, identified as Charlie Kirk’s chief of staff and friend. It is stated that Mikey spent the entire morning dutifully and loyally by Charlie’s side, filming everything. The tension arises at the moment Charlie is killed: according to the speaker, Mikey abandoned Charlie in that instant. The crucial question posed is whether Charlie was actually dead and whether he needed help at that moment. The speaker then asks if Mikey rushed to Charlie’s aid or instead pulled out his phone to continue filming, implying that Mikey’s actions or inactions could be revealing of his priorities at the critical moment. The line “Anything?” echoes a probing or accusatory tone, followed by a blunt “No. Nothing.” This sequence reinforces the claim that Mikey did not intervene or assist Charlie as the situation deteriorated. The narration emphasizes the abrupt change in Mikey McCoy’s behavior, asserting that “All of a sudden, Mikey McCoy didn't care about Charlie Kirk at all and just left him behind.” This creates a stark contrast between the earlier portrayal of Mikey as a loyal companion who documented the day and the sudden implication of neglect or abandonment at Charlie’s time of need. The passage culminates with a direct, open-ended inquiry: “What is going on?” This question underscores the overall mystery and suggests that the relationship dynamics and the sequence of events surrounding Charlie’s death, as well as Mikey’s actions, are the focus of concern. In summary, the speaker contrasts Mikey McCoy’s supposed early devotion and his later alleged abandonment of Charlie Kirk at the moment of a fatal incident, raising questions about whether Charlie was dead, whether help was needed, and whether Mikey prioritized filming over aiding Charlie. The framing invites scrutiny of Mikey’s conduct and the surrounding circumstances.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. Like to move on. No way I can start to get my mind to figure out. Where did they be rescuing? Let's go. Wow. Look at that. Beautiful. Look at that. Just give him a little taste. Mhmm. Mikey McCoy, Charlie's chief of staff and friend who spent the whole morning dutifully and loyally by Charlie's side filming everything, Abandoned Charlie in the very instant Charlie was killed. Was Charlie actually dead? Did he need help? Did Mikey rush to his aid or get his phone camera out? Anything? No. Nothing. All of a sudden, Mikey McCoy didn't care about Charlie Kirk at all and just left him behind. What is going on?
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 26, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Saved - October 27, 2025 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Candace Owens cameoed in Ian Carroll’s comments and she’ll return to build on Mikey McCoy developments. I have questions about who Mikey spoke with before Charlie was shot, why Erika Kirk and Rob McCoy claim Mikey called at that moment, Rob’s claim about blood, Mikey’s backpack during the event, Mikey and Elizabeth McCoy’s roles with TPUSA, TPUSA finances Charlie investigated, Israel/Netanyahu’s $150M offer and DOGE memo, donor losses, potential extortion, what Mikey, Elizabeth, and Rob hid, the Cayman Islands searches, and why TPUSA leadership isn’t following Charlie’s pro-Israel direction. What questions do you have?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Candace Owens made a cameo appearance in Ian Carroll's YouTube comments saying she'll be back tomorrow to build on the Mikey McCoy developments. I have many questions that I hope she, or all of us, can get answers to. Here are just a few: ▪️Who was Mikey on the phone with when Charlie was shot? ▪️Why did Erika Kirk & Rob McCoy both claim that Mikey called them the very minute Charlie was shot? ▪️Why did Rob McCoy lie about Mikey having Charlie's blood all over him? ▪️After walking around all morning with his backpack on, why didn't Mikey take it off once they were all set up and Charlie's appearance was underway? Was he planning on wearing that big backpack for the entire duration of the event? Maybe he didn't bother to take it off, because... ▪️What role did Mikey and his wife, TPUSA Director of Event Planning Elizabeth McCoy, have in setting up the UVU appearance if any? ▪️What was going on with the TPUSA finances that Charlie was investigating? ▪️What did israel know about the problematic TPUSA finances? Did Netanyahu know something when he basically offered to double Charlie's budget with that $150 million offer 1 month before Charlie's internal memo announcing a DOGE investigation on September 2nd? ▪️Did the loss of big jewish donors trigger Charlie's closer examination of TPUSA's financial health? ▪️Was the simultaneous departure of jewish megadonors and Netanyahu's big money offer a coordinated plan to essentially "extort" Charlie into greater financial dependence on them? ▪️What else have Mikey, Elizabeth & Rob McCoy not been forthcoming about concerning this whole affair? Remember, Rob McCoy was in the group chat wherein Charlie announced he was dropping the pro-israel cause. Why did he remain quiet about that? ▪️Right before the assassination, why was there so much internet search curiosity from the Cayman Islands for Mikey McCoy (8/12, 8/16, 9/9--the day before!), Elizabeth McCoy (8/31), & Erika Kirk (8/15), but NOT Charlie Kirk? ▪️Why isn't the new TPUSA leadership following Charlie's last direction to drop the pro-israel cause? I thought they wanted to honor his legacy? And that's just my short list! What questions do you have?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 25, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Saved - October 26, 2025 at 1:24 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING, FBI DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE: Ryne Simmons says the FBI tried to get him to DELETE his Charlie Kirk assassination video. Is this why we've gotten so little footage from witnesses?! How many witnesses followed these FBI instructions? Outrageous. Cover-up confirmed? https://t.co/yQRwdr5o8z

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Skyler Baird was searched from Israel and DC prior to the assassination, but not Utah. He has 2,400 followers (account since 2006) with only 7 posts, 5 after the event. Before the assassination: a Coast Guard helicopter photo (2018) and a July 2025 Epstein FB post. One LDS verse post; unorthodox rat-tail haircut. A curious link to Daniel Merrell of Hardscape Utah. Watch the HustleBitch_ video. Who is this guy, and how does he get close access to Charlie Kirk?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

MORE CHARLIE KIRK BREAKING, THE MYSTERY Of "RANDOM" ASSASSINATION WITNESS SKYLER BAIRD: ▪️Skyler Baird was searched from israel and DC prior to the assassination, but not from Utah. (see below) ▪️He has 2,400 followers on an account created in 2006, but only 7 posts ever to the page, 5 of which are since the assassination. (source below) ▪️Before Assassination: 1 old picture of him working as a Coast Guard helicopter team member in 2018. (pic below) ▪️Before Assassination: 1 Jeffrey Epstein FB post from July 10, 2025 (1 israeli search of him was from July 3rd, 2025). (pictured below) ▪️1 FB post is a semi-obscure verse from the Book of Mormon, signaling devout LDS membership, but doesn't appear to be wearing the LDS garments. No discernible undershirt or telltale outlines around the thighline or neckline. (pictured below) ▪️Has a weird little rat tail hair-do, definitely unorthodox for a Mormon. Like really unorthodox. I've never seen a fellow Mormon man--devout or otherwise--wear his hair like that. (shown below) ▪️Has a strange interaction with Daniel Merrell--the guy from Hardscape Utah who allegedly paved over the crime scene on the Sunday morning after the assassination. (shown below) Make sure to watch the video posted by @HustleBitch_ below to more fully understand these details. (quote tweeted below) Who is this guy? And how does he keep getting such close access to Charlie Kirk?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 THE “EYEWITNESS” FROM CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION ENDED UP VIP AT HIS MEMORIAL Meet Skyler Baird, the guy seen right behind Charlie’s head when the shot went off. He gave four VERY STRANGE interviews claiming he was just a random bystander… but the footage doesn’t lie. He started back in the crowd, then somehow moved to the front row moments before the shooting. Days later, he’s on the main floor center at Charlie’s memorial with a MEDIA badge, just rows from the stage after saying he probably couldn’t even get in. His Facebook? 2.4K followers. 7 posts. No content. No history. Just a “digital creator” tag and front-row access everywhere. He was front row for the assassination… then cleared three security checkpoints to sit VIP at the memorial? That’s not coincidence. That’s placement. Was he a witness… or part of the setup?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The clip centers on Skyler, a man seen in multiple interviews right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters highlight that Skyler appeared in about four online interviews, and he’s pictured with sunglasses on top of his head behind Charlie’s head. They note that the day Charlie Kirk was shot, Skyler was front row to witness it, and in the interviews he never claims to be press or someone important, yet he sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. They question how this is possible and point to oddities in his interviews. In one sequence, Skyler is described as being only about 10 to 15 feet away when it happened, with security to his left and nothing else in front of him—“Close as he could.” They show Skyler and Charlie’s bodyguard moving to a different area once Charlie arrives and questions begin. Skyler is described as front row and center, with the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie and Skyler off to the side with sunglasses on his head. The footage is contrasted with his Facebook activity, which the speakers examine afterward. They state that at the memorial service Skyler was “sitting on the Main Floor” with a floor pass for a press conference, seated literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They contrast this with Skyler’s Facebook page, noting that he has “two point, I think, k followings,” and that from 2018 to 02/2025 there are “maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures.” The presenters remark that there is little material on his page, suggesting a discrepancy between his apparent access and his online footprint. Further, the speakers recount Skyler’s account of entering the stadium. He says, “There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They’re definitely protecting this place,” and adds that there had been “an overflow,” with people waiting since 05:30 in the morning. Yet Skyler ends up with a floor pass and sits just a few rows back on the Main Floor with a badge that says media, prompting the question: “How?” They describe how another person explained the process of passing through multiple layers to obtain a media badge and access the floor. The discussion turns speculative: Skyler “was handpicked to do all these interviews,” to have “front row” seating, and to be present at key moments. The dialogue then shifts to a series of unusual videos by Skyler, described as “bizarre.” One clip contains a speaker describing an “indecision night” where they say, “I photoshopped in my mind the blood away,” “I rewound the tape,” and “the shooter… goes down the stairs,” with continued vivid, fantastical editing of the event.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. The Skyler guy gave about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. Oddly enough, he is also seen right there with the glasses, right behind Charlie's head. The day that he was shot, he was front row to witness it. And then in all of his media interviews, he never once says he's press or anyone of importance, yet somehow he is able to sit on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd? And wait until you see where he was at the beginning of the day and then how he has moved to the front row. Very odd. Speaker 1: Watch the video for, like, 10. Speaker 2: It's like Speaker 1: Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Speaker 2: Close as he could. Speaker 1: To my left is security. In the front of me is a security guard and then nothing else. Just Charlie Speaker 2: Baird says. Speaker 0: Okay. If you notice here, Skyler is the air is pointing it, and he's got those sunglasses kinda on top of his head, and then you're gonna see Charlie's bodyguard right there. So you see how they're kinda up against the wall? This was taken before it all started. This was around noon. So he's kinda up in the crowd, and the bodyguard is up in the crowd, which I find very odd because he's, like, behind the gate up into the crowd. And what you're gonna see next is it'll be the live footage of someone recording it, and this is around, like I said, noon, I believe. There they are. The bodyguard's kinda looking back towards him, and that's Skyler right there with the glasses on his head. Now do you see how far back they are kind of in the audience? Now you're actually gonna see where Skyler and the bodyguard move to a completely different area once Charlie gets there and the questions get started. So there is the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie, and then Skyler is over to the side with those sunglasses on his head directly off to the side corner of Charlie. So and that's exactly how he described it in that interview where he was and how he was positioned, how he said he was front row, Noel was in front of him. He had a bodyguard to the left of him and one in front of him. And so that is Skyler right there, front row and center. So this guy got front row seats. He's done all these interviews. And then I go and I find his Facebook and find out that at the memorial service, he was sitting on the Main Floor and had a floor pass press conference and was sitting literally, like, maybe 10 or so rows Speaker 1: Ruins that. Speaker 0: From the front of the stage. Speaker 2: He's since found some clarity. Speaker 1: Story was that Charlie Kirk was murdered for his political views. Speaker 2: And as everyone contemplates what's next Speaker 1: there's a cancer growing in our society. Speaker 2: He hopes for reflection Speaker 1: because there's a real cancer in our society and it's not just But Speaker 2: I know you were talking about the excitement there and focusing on the positives. So how do you wanna make sure that that he's remembered? Speaker 0: Okay. Now here he is sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, and I'm gonna get to that in a second because it's on his Facebook. But when we get to his Facebook page, something I really noticed was he's got two point, I think, k followings. So you think he'd have, like, a lot of stuff on his page that is interesting because, I mean, I'm gonna follow something, someone if their page has got, you know, all this awesome content on it and I wanna go back and, you know, view it all. He literally, from 2018 to to 02/2025, has maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures. This is his page, his Facebook page. I followed it so I could, you know, following it so I could view everything as if I'm following him. No reels, no nothing. He's a digital creator for what? This is all he has. That's 02/1978 post. But listen to him here. Speaker 1: Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They're definitely protecting this place. The all signs point to us not being able to get in, but the stadium's already overflown. The overflow's already overflown, and this is an hour before start time. There's been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning. Speaker 0: Okay. Notice how he said, and I don't know if I'm gonna be able to get in because people have been waiting out here forever. Okay. But then he gets a floor pass and gets to sit literally a few rows back on the Main Floor with a Did you hear pass that says media? How? Who is this guy? Speaker 1: I went past the first layer, letting him know that I was here for media. Went past the second layer. And the third layer required me to have a badge, and then we took it down to the floor. So that became requisite of me to get a badge. Speaker 3: So, Speaker 0: again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn't even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It's just like it's like it's a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It's like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there. And then lo and behold, he's literally front row right there to see when Charlie, you know, was shot. Who is this guy? It's like he was planted in. Everything about this guy just screams or he flags me. Something is off. Who is he and who is he tied to? And seriously, go watch his videos. They are bizarre. Speaker 3: An indecision night. I I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and re rewound the tape in my mind. I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I I was being transported up into this where the rifle was, and I I stuck a flower inside the rifle. I rewound the tape more in my mind's eye and the shooter. He goes down the stairs. I'm rewinding him. I'm I'm push
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 7:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a post claiming Mikey McCoy, Charlie Kirk’s chief of staff, abandoned him at the moment of Charlie’s death. It says Mikey calmly walks away as others rush to help, with no apparent concern or rush for safety, and it questions whether his behavior was panicked, suspicious, or simply a nothingburger. The piece invites viewers to watch and decide what’s really going on.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: @scootie_84 & @GtgTrinity4205

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by saying they want to move on and express that they cannot yet figure out where the rescue is. They then shift to a scene they describe as beautiful, remarking on something they’re observing: “Wow. Look at that. Beautiful. Look at that.” The central claim concerns Mikey McCoy, identified as Charlie Kirk’s chief of staff and a friend who reportedly spent the entire morning dutifully and loyally by Charlie’s side, filming everything. According to the speaker, Mikey abandoned Charlie in the very instant Charlie was killed. The speaker questions the sequence of events: Was Charlie actually dead? Did he need help? The speaker then interrogates Mikey’s actions or inactions in that moment: Did Mikey rush to Charlie’s aid, or did he instead reach for his phone camera? The speaker notes that there was “Nothing. All of a sudden, Mikey McCoy didn’t care about Charlie Kirk at all and just left him behind.” The passage ends with a puzzled inquiry: “What is going on?” The overall tension centers on the abrupt shift from loyal presence and filming to abandonment at the moment of Charlie’s supposed death, prompting questions about the true sequence of events and Mikey’s priorities in that instant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. Like to move on. No way I can start to get my mind to figure out. Where did they be rescuing? Let's go. Wow. Look at that. Beautiful. Look at that. Just give him a little taste. Mhmm. Mikey McCoy, Charlie's chief of staff and friend who spent the whole morning dutifully and loyally by Charlie's side filming everything, Abandoned Charlie in the very instant Charlie was killed. Was Charlie actually dead? Did he need help? Did Mikey rush to his aid or get his phone camera out? Anything? No. Nothing. All of a sudden, Mikey McCoy didn't care about Charlie Kirk at all and just left him behind. What is going on?
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 20, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I relay a thread alleging coincidences around the Charlie Kirk case: judges Lunnen and Graf with Israeli IP searches pre- and post-assassination, Graf’s gag order, and Mehtab Syed’s demotion amid White House links. I note claimed parallels to JFK/RFK/MLK cases—notable “Jewish involvement,” Vietnam war links, and big-funeral symbolism. I invite crowd-sourced parallels in the comments, stressing no official court narrative here.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING NEWS, TYLER ROBINSON TRIAL: Tony Graf, the judge selected to preside over the Charlie Kirk assassination trial—and the judge he replaced, Robert Lunnen—were both the subject of unique Google searches from israeli IP addresses BEFORE the assassination (July 26 & May 15, respectively). Neither was the subject of any searches in Utah until AFTER the assassination. Judge Lunnen retired on August 1, & Judge Graf assumed his duties on August 4th—on or about the same day Mehtab Syed, the Special Agent In Charge of the SLC FBI field office, was removed. Just a bunch of coincidences? 1/ Sources in next tweet

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Judge Robert Lunnen retired on August 1, 2025. He was replaced by Judge Tony Graf, who was sworn in on August 4th, after Graf was appointed by Governor Spencer Cox on May 2, 2025. Also notable, Graf formerly worked as a special assistant to the US Attorney in Washington DC. https://t.co/QSlDG2Pig1

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Neither judge was searched for from DC or Utah IP addresses before the assassination, only from israeli IP addresses: https://t.co/tJoF09bSRP

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Mehtab Syed's removal from the SLC FBI Field Office was announced in the media on August 5, 2025: https://t.co/uHanC67y6M

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Mehtab Syed's removal order likely came from Stephen Miller (✡️) of the White House. Notes and thread: https://t.co/QfMzNFeRVH

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ The day Charlie was assassinated, The Guardian ran a story that the order to take action against the fired FBI agents in early August came from White House aide STEPHEN MILLER ✡️! Someone who isn't in any Department of Justice/FBI chain of command. What's interesting is that: 1) Kash Patel admitted that he was forced to make these changes if he wanted to keep his own job. 2) Kash acknowledged that the FBI would be sued over many of these firings and LOSE. Yet they were willing to do it anyway. Now, we get back to the case of Mehtab Syed: she wasn't fired--she was offered a DEMOTION. But why? There it is in black and white: the FBI was not afraid of firing agents, getting sued for it, and losing. Why didn't they take this approach against Syed? Why didn't they just fire her, too? Is it because they didn't want her case going to court? Did they not want that level of scrutiny in her case? Did they want it to quietly go away? No court, no case, no discovery, no scrutiny, NO SPOTLIGHT. BTW, don't notice the ethnicity of the guy who wrote this story. Curiously, this particular article mentions NOTHING about Mehtab Syed. Why not? Did he not want us connecting Mehtab back to Stephen Miller? Was Miller behind her removal, too?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Judge Tony Graf has issued a gag order on ALL witnesses in the Charlie Kirk assassination trial. https://t.co/8kOfsC6gNu

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The Judge presiding over Tyler Robinson‘s trial has set an unprecedented gag order that has gagged every single whiteness that has been identified. https://t.co/FJf6qXR9RC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses Tyler Robinson’s gag order and the possibility of someone calling him, citing Elizabeth Lane, a journalist trying to help Robinson get a new attorney. Lane says a phone call to Robinson is absolutely not possible. The video references Project Constitution claiming exclusivity and presents sensational claims: “Tyler Robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast,” a blurry “handers threatening him to stay quiet,” a seven-minute connected video call where Robinson’s face is blurred and an audio clip where he identifies the commentator and then “stone walls,” with family and friends trying to rally him and describing a “gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else.” The video content includes a “post Kennedy hit” analogy and questions about Robinson’s defense, suggesting he won’t get a courtroom appearance and that the situation resembles a conspiracy. The video also presents a claim that Tyler Robinson’s wife has no say in his defense. Parallel to these claims, the transcript introduces a news-style segment with several speakers (Speaker 1, Speaker 2, Speaker 3) about Robinson’s latest court hearing. The hearing was brief; Robinson wasn’t present, listening from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on evidence from the crime scene. There is a substantial amount of discovery. Robinson’s lawyers filed a formal appearance and did not waive the right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graff issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it to avoid pretrial publicity, given the high-profile nature of the case in Utah. The judge aims to protect Robinson’s constitutional rights and the rights of the victim, and the court will rule on how to handle witnesses who have not yet been identified. The witnesses, potentially numbering in the thousands, include individuals who spoke to an audience of 2,000–3,000 students at Utah Valley University. As witnesses become known to each side, the information will be conveyed to comply with the gag order. Outside the courtroom, counsel declined to comment. A further hearing is scheduled in person for October 30. The initial speaker critiques the notion of a fair trial in Robinson’s case, asserting that Robinson was captured on numerous campus cameras during the incident, from entering the roof area to firing a shot and retreating, with a rapid sequence of movements and a subsequent drop-off of the weapon. The speaker argues that Robinson will not reach a courtroom and predicts he will be “Epstein’d” and removed, comparing the scenario to JFK and MLK assassinations and suggesting involvement by someone connected to Israel. The speaker claims that this is a “joke” and believes Tyler Robinson will die before trial, asserting that “nobody’s buying it.” The overall tone blends skepticism about a fair trial with conspiratorial accusations about the handling of Robinson’s case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I wanna make this video, and I wanna talk a little bit about Tyler Robinson's gag order and why I don't think anybody's actually gonna get a phone call to Tyler Robinson. So I reached out to Elizabeth Lane. She's the journalist. She's actually trying to get Tyler Robinson a new attorney. And I showed her this video, and I was like, is it possible that somebody's getting a phone call with Tyler Robinson? She's like, absolutely not. So so Project Constitution says exclusive. Tyler Robinson breaks silence then hangs up fast. Blurry ghost on video. Handlers threatening him to stay quiet. Video call connected after seven minutes, but Tyler's face blurred like a frosted ghost. Just a set shadowy orange blob. Audio only clip below. He IDs me, then stone walls. Only family slash friends right now tried rallying him on the army for fighting for truth plus commentary cash. Hangs up. Boom. Ten minute call. Mostly silent. Attorney gag order or handlers warning him to shut the fuck up or else. Like Oswald, post Kennedy hit. Pinned in silence forever. I fear for Tyler's wife. And what the fuck? No say in his own defense, this scream set up. I agree with a lot of this. You know? Like, I agree with this the fact that we can't get him a new attorney and some shit like that. Well, people are actually trying to get a new attorney to him. And for some reason, the gag order shit is unprecedented. We've never seen it. But I just don't think that anybody's actually gonna randomly get a phone call into Tyler. If anything, I think Tyler's in on this. His family's in on this. None of this makes sense, and it screams conspiracy theory. I don't think Tyler Robinson is actually gonna see it to a courtroom. I think we they're gonna Epstein him and then obviously put him on a gurney and roll him out the back door and let him go on his merry way. He'll probably be over in Israel kicking it with Epstein, but I digress. I want you to take a listen to this. The attorney speaking or the the news explaining these type of gag orders and what these gag orders actually are and how many people are actually gagged involved in this investigation. Check this out. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson's latest court hearing was brief, but some interesting things did happen, including one issue that could impact thousands of people here in Utah. Speaker 2: Good morning. Court is now in session. Speaker 1: Tyler Robinson was not present for the hearing. Instead, he listened in from the Utah County Jail. Lawyers focused on upcoming issues like evidence from the crime scene. Speaker 3: There is a a substantial amount of discovery in this case, your honor. It's voluminous to say the least. Speaker 1: His lawyers entered their formal appearance and declined to waive his right to a preliminary hearing. Judge Tony Graff has issued a gag order preventing anyone associated with the case from talking about it. It's to avoid pretrial publicity, already a big problem in a case with massive media exposure involving a high profile figure like Charlie Kirk, but the judge wants to ensure a fairer trial for Robinson. It's also brought up a big issue involving thousands of people. Speaker 3: We're seeking some clarification with respect to the phrase all witnesses, your honor. There are a number of witnesses that have yet to be identified, that will likely be used in the state's case. This occurred in front of two to 3,000 students at Utah Valley University. So we're in the process of identifying those witnesses. And so those individuals are presently unknown right now. Speaker 2: The court will rule that as the witnesses become known to each side that that information is conveyed to abide by this order. Obviously, there are potentially, many witnesses, and so it's not the expectation that you would be able to do that upfront, but as they become known. Speaker 1: The judge made it clear he wants to ensure Robinson's constitutional rights will be protected as well as the rights of the victim. Speaker 2: Counsel, regardless of who is watching, whether it is the nation or a single individual, We must fulfill our roles with integrity, civility, and diligence. I encourage each of you to give your very best to this case. Neither mister Robinson nor the people of Utah deserve anything less than the fair and impartial administration of justice. Speaker 1: Any comment? Outside court, lawyers declined to comment. Speaker 3: Any comment? Not today. Not today. Thanks, though. Speaker 1: Robinson will be back here in court in person for another hearing on October 30. Speaker 0: So you see what I'm saying? What do you mean a fair trial? Tyler Robinson was on camera on what? 50, maybe even a 100 different cameras every if he was actually there every second that the man was on campus, including him going through the stairwell, grabbing his rifle out of the bushes, getting up onto the roof, hopping over the railing, getting into the prone position, sprinting across the roof. And then after he fired that shot, somehow magically within three seconds, the dude was up in a full sprint across the roof. And then after he went and ran all the way about a mile and went and dropped off his weapon at some in the some magical drop spot in the woods, then he had to somehow sneak back to campus, get his vehicle, and then drive, and then make it to a coffee shop that was about a mile and a half away and do all that in under twenty minutes. But trust me, Tyler Robinson's gonna get a fair trial. He's gonna get a fair shake. Now if we talk about it, we might damage that investigation. We might wreck his chances of having a free and fair trial here in America. Tyler Robinson ain't make it to a courtroom, dude. They are gonna smoke this dude. They're gonna Epstein him. Nobody's buying it. Nobody's believing oh, sorry. Jack Posobic is still buying it. That guy still believes it, obviously. And all the people that go on podcasts and do interviews with him as well because, yeah, there's that. Sham, dude. This is all one big joke. Dude, this is gonna Epstein him. This is gonna be, like, just like JFK. It has JFK vibes written all over it. MLK, in comes the magical person, most likely related or connected directly to Israel. Takes a shot, takes out Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson's dead case closed. That's how it's gonna end up. We already know it. It's a joke.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

The truth about the Charlie Kirk assassination is going to come out one way or another. Just like the truth about the JFK assassination is coming out and there is nothing Jack Posobiec can do to stop it! https://t.co/8piWjQc07c

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 introduces the topic of Israel allegedly having influence over the US government and mentions that Israel assassinated JFK, pointing to William Cooper as the source who was also assassinated by Israel. Speaker 0 references Cooper’s book Behold a Pale Horse and notes that Cooper was the first to obtain original footage from a CIA whistleblower showing who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. He says the media’s clips started at a cropped frame, and that Cooper’s release prompted further questions. Speaker 1 explains that the assassin was the driver in the car with Kennedy, visible in a film with public help. He brings the film, saying it shows the motorcade on Elm Street in front of the Book Depository Building, Kennedy having been shot in the throat, Jacqueline pulling Kennedy toward him in shock, and the driver turning around with a pistol in his left hand, firing over his right shoulder and shooting the president in the head. Speaker 2 asks for a repeat and then the duo watches the film. Speaker 1 identifies the driver as William Greer, noting he was a secret service agent. He describes the weapon as an electrically operated gas-powered assassination pistol built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency, asserting there is no puff of smoke. Speaker 2 questions whether the weapon is indeed a pistol in the lower right corner of the frame. Speaker 1 confirms it is an air-operated pistol (pneumatic) and claims it fired an exploding pellet that injected shellfish toxin into the president’s brain, so that if the pellet’s explosion did not kill him, the toxin would. He states that he read all of this in the documents. Speaker 0 asks what type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK and references the 1963 time frame, saying that intelligence agencies would have such weapons. He then questions whether intelligence agencies could have used such weapons to assassinate Charlie Kirk. He suggests listening to Jack Posobiec and others who are “carrying water for this administration,” implying time will tell.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're new to this whole just waking up to how much Israel controls our government thing, you're thinking to yourself, Ryan, Israel would never assassinate JFK, not a US president. Right? They're our greatest ally. And then I would tell you, well, have you ever listened to a gentleman by the name of William Cooper? He was also assassinated by Israel. This gentleman wrote a book called Behold a Pale Horse. You guys have probably seen that the pope just received a pale horse. Everybody's talking about a pale horse, but you might have missed this clip from William Cooper. He was the one who the first one to actually get the original footage from a CIA whistleblower that actually showed who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. The the clips that we are seeing from the media always specifically started at a specific point, and part of the frame was cropped out. But it wasn't till William Cooper released this video that we really started to ask a lot of questions. Check this out. Speaker 1: Said that the assassin was the driver in the car in which he was riding in Dallas on that day, and it was plainly visible in a film with help from the public. Speaker 2: Now you brought that film with you. Let's take a look at that if we can. Here's the film. Go ahead and narrate this for us, Will. Speaker 1: Well, it took me sixteen years to find this film because it has really been withheld, and what you're seeing here is the motorcade on Elm Street passing in front of the Book Depository Building. Kennedy has been shot in the throat, and Jacqueline is pulling him toward her trying to comfort him, and she's in shock. At this time, you see the driver turn around with a pistol in his left hand firing over his right shoulder and shoots the president directly in the head. Speaker 2: You need a repeat of it. Yeah. Speaker 1: The weapon watch the driver. His name is William Greer. He was, in fact, a secret service agent. The weapon is a an electrically operated gas powered assassination pistol built built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency. You don't see any puff of smoke any from That's correct. Speaker 2: Because you think is a pistol there in the right hand corner, lower right hand corner. Speaker 1: That's correct. Speaker 2: It is a say? Speaker 1: Well, it's an it's an air operated pistol. It's pneumatic. And it actually fired an exploding pellet, which injected shellfish toxin into the president's brain so that if the actual explosion of the pellet itself did not kill him, the toxin would. Now did you read all of this Yes. In in the documents? Yes. And that's why, his brain was switched for another brain in transit between Parkland, Hospital in Dallas and Bethesda Naval Hospital in Washington DC. Speaker 0: Wait. Wait. Wait. What type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK? And that was in what? Sixty three ish time frame? No way our intelligence agencies have those type Speaker 2: of weapons that could have Speaker 0: been used to assassinate Charlie Kirk, could they? Maybe we Speaker 2: should just listen to Jack Posobic and all those goons that Speaker 0: are carrying water for this administration. Time will tell.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Of the 5 finalists announced in April to be under consideration for the Judge Lunnen vacancy, Von Christiansen was also searched for from israel prior to the assassination! https://t.co/w6V0sKBiNH

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Background on Robert Lunnen, the outgoing judge. He worked for the US Dept of Justice for 21 years, including as an attache in Kabul, Afghanistan: https://t.co/A6hy5tdh1m

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ If you want to send me info tips, my DMs are open. If you want to send me monetary tips, here is a link. X demonetized me a long time ago, so I do this for the struggle. BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto options are all available: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

10/ Might redo this, but it holds up—The Deadly Parallels between JFK, RFK, MLK & CJK: https://t.co/nnOjM07ned

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mia_Stretch https://t.co/oDxhqsKPLR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mindfullee How dare you point out the obvious conclusion!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@dawvid6_david FR FR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@OttoBraun1976 Always mocking us, the goyim.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Tburdy @novaxnomask Lol. Nope. Try again.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@denise3kids7 I've noticed it often depends on whether you search from desktop or mobile and which time frames you use.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@joeligato That's why we have to make it count THIS time

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@kory_tams Gotta get in early!

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 18, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 5:32 PM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

What if I told you the same people who travel from New York to the middle east to steal homes also happen to be the worst landlords in New York? https://t.co/WJKwQBno4u

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 18, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Saved - October 18, 2025 at 11:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Kash Patel claimed FBI found Tyler Robinson’s DNA on both a screwdriver and the rifle, twice on September 15. Yet the September 16 indictment lists DNA only on the gun, not the screwdriver. The gun wasn’t recovered at the scene, no ballistics yet; the screwdriver on the roof would tie him to the scene. The omission feels odd, and others echo concern about this narrative gap and its implications.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

KASH PATEL'S CHARLIE KIRK NARRATIVE SLIP-UP: THE CASE OF THE FORGOTTEN SCREWDRIVER On September 15th, Kash Patel clearly told us the FBI spared no resource in investigating the scene of the crime, and definitively asserted that Tyler Robinson's DNA was found on BOTH a screwdriver found at the scene & on the recovered rifle. In fact, he made the claim Twice in this segment. Just one problem: In Tyler Robinson's indictment the very next day, September 16th, it lists ONLY the DNA on the gun and says nothing whatsoever about any screwdriver at all. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Nada. (I've put all the receipts in the video below) What's going on with this important narrative inconsistency? Am I an "anarchist" for asking these follow-ups, Mr. FBI Director?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes rapid FBI mobilization following the shooting, stating resources were surged and multiple air assets deployed. Agents, evidence response technicians, hostage rescue technicians, and special operators were cycled in and out of Utah, with evidence transported on FBI planes to prevent delay. By around 5 PM local time on September 11, he and the deputy on the ground walked the entire crime scene, including the suspect’s footprinted area and the area the suspect used. They found evidence such as DNA on items collected, including a screwdriver found on the rooftop, and they went to the wooded area where the firearm was discarded, noting that the firearm had a towel wrapped around it. He emphasizes the importance of his investigative experience and states that with the support of President Trump and the White House, the necessary resources were provided. He adds that the DNA hits from the towel wrapped around the firearm and the screwdriver were positively processed for the suspect in custody. Speaker 1 counterpoints by referencing the Tyler Robinson indictment, asserting that there is nothing about a screwdriver or DNA on a screwdriver. He directs attention to page three, where the indictment states that DNA consistent with Robinson was found on the rifle’s trigger. He notes that after the shooting, Robinson hid the gun, and the indictment indicates DNA consistent with Robinson on the trigger, along with the rifle, ammunition rounds, towel, fired cartridge casing, two of the three unfired cartridges, and the towel being sent for forensic testing. He reiterates that there is nothing about a screwdriver in the indictment and plans to prove this by searching, finding no results for “screwdriver” or “screwdriver” mentions. He states there is nothing about a screwdriver in the entire indictment and invites readers to read it themselves. Speaker 1 questions why Cash Patel would claim there was a screwdriver with DNA, asking if it’s being saved for the trial and why it appears in the indictment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We flexed all resources the FBI had and surged multiple air assets as soon as this shooting occurred. We were cycling in agents, evidence response technicians, hostage rescue technicians, and special operators in and out of Utah, cycling evidence back and forth on these FBI planes as soon as we could so that there was no delay. And what we did, once I got there along with the deputy on the ground on the around 5PM local on September 11 was walk the entire crime scene, including the foots the subs suspect himself took. And what we learned was there was evidence, DNA evidence that could be collected and had been collected, including a screwdriver that was found on the rooftop. Also, we went over to the scene in the wooded area where the firearm was discarded, and the firearm had a towel wrapped around it. It's important. I'll get back to that later. I even walked into the wooded area in the ravine, so I knew from my investigative experience what I could bring to the table and what decisions I needed to make. And having the support of president Trump and the full support of the White House was what we needed for these resources to happen. And I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the suspect in custody. Speaker 1: Looking at the Tyler Robinson indictment, and we're gonna find out that there's nothing about a screwdriver or DNA on a screwdriver. So let's come down here to page three, and you can see quite clearly. It says right here, it does talk about DNA. DNA consistent with Robinson was found on the rifle's trigger. Okay? After the shooting, mister after shooting mister Kirk, Robinson hid the gun. So it's declaring that that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk and that DNA was found on the trigger. Later, if we scroll down, we're going to find out that there was also it says the rifle, ammunition rounds, towel was sent for forensic testing. DNA consistent with Robinson's was found on the trigger. Other parts of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing two of the three unfired cartridges and the towel. It says nothing about a screwdriver anywhere in the indictment. And let's to prove this to I'm gonna do a search. Screw. No search results. Let's do screwdriver. Searching. No matching results. K. There's nothing about a screwdriver in the entire indictment. You can go read it yourself. Why did Cash Patel tell us that there was a screwdriver with ANA on? Are they saving her for the trial? Why is it in the indictment? I would think it would be in the indictment.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Spelling out why this was so important and why it's odd the screwdriver wasn't included in the write-up: 1) The gun wasn't recovered at the scene, it was recovered some distance away. No ballistics matching had been done at that point in time, so the gun in the woods didn't actually place Robinson at the scene. It's just a gun in the woods. 2) The screwdriver was allegedly recovered at the scene on the roof, which more directly connects Robinson to the roof. Therefore, it's actually a very important piece of evidence. It's a glaring omission to note. Maybe it's nothing. But maybe it's not.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Mel @Villgecrazylady has noted the same in on omission with other commentary here: https://t.co/kfdegLtotw

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

He changed clothes in the woods where he left the rifle? You sure about that? Funny you mention a screwdriver. You know what never mentions a screwdriver? The indictment and the probable cause affidavit. Weird that such a key piece of evidence wouldn’t be mentioned in either, don’t you think?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the person shows back up in his neighborhood after the shooting. It shows him in a field, because they believe he probably popped up over there, came up the hill from where they feel the gun was dropped. He ran up there, over the hill, and then ran down that dirt path, and that’s where they see...
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shows back up in his neighborhood after the shooting. It it shows him in that field because I believe he probably popped up over there, come up the hill from where we feel that the gun was dropped. He ran up there, run over the hill, and then run down that path, that dirt path, and that's where we see

@Jim_0_Hara - Jim O'Hara

@WattsToFreedom @Villgecrazylady Tyler had just assassinated someone in front of thousands of people. He was rushing to get out of the area. When he went into the woods he changed clothes, but had to leave the rifle because he dropped the screwdriver on the roof. He couldn't break it down without the screwdriver

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@RavensLandingP "Badges?"

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ShutUp_n_Sing I don't know that there's any one person. It's been a team effort.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@whitesocksclips Me: presents hard data and facts with receipts. You: responds with gaslighting Interesting.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@FC4LIFE76 Good pun

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@OliverJanich Link doesn't work for me

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ebwegman What did Ian say about him?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 16, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 4:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Four days after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, they ripped up the landscaping, claiming pre-scheduled maintenance. I argued Sunday work in Utah County, where the Sabbath is sacred, is highly unusual and pointed to a possible on-the-fly cover-up. Now it’s admitted: not pre-scheduled, but spur-of-the-moment and tied to the assassination. Daniel Merrell of Hardscape Utah is linked by unusual search activity. I’m not accusing him, but I find it suspicious and want answers from authorities.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION NARRATIVE TAKES ANOTHER HIT! DESTRUCTION OF THE CRIME SCENE WAS NOT PRE-SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE 4 days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, they ripped up the landscaping & paved it over. We were originally told it was just a pre-scheduled project proceeding as planned. I've said repeatedly in Twitter spaces since then that it's extremely unusual for work like this to be done on a Sunday in Utah County—where even gas stations are closed, gas pumps are turned off and vending machines have been known to be deactivated! It's the heart of LDS/Mormon country and they take the sabbath very seriously. *Scheduled* maintenence work like this would logically & routinely have begun on a Monday, or some other day of the week. NOT ON SUNDAY. I said that this was an indication that it wasn't pre-planned, but done on the fly, and therefore must probably a cover-up operation. Now, we find out that it indeed WAS done on a Sunday—by a brother who admits he typically doesn't do this work on Sundays! And it wasn't pre-scheduled, but spur-of-the-moment & directly due to the assassination! (video via @HustleBitch_) I. WAS. RIGHT. But there's more: Google Trends shows that the man who did the work, Daniel Merrell—owner of Hardscape Utah—was searched from israeli IP addresses earlier this summer! And in the exact same time frame that people in DC & israel were searching for "Timpanogas Regional Hospital" (the hospital where Charlie was taken), and Deirde Amaro (the new Utah state medical examiner who performed the autopsy). What?! (h/t: @Ammermazing) Now, to be clear, I'm not accusing Daniel Merrell of anything nefarious. This all doesn't mean he's in on any plot. I'm sure he was just doing what was asked of him, like he said. But don't you find all this very strange and extremely suspicious? The JFK, RFK & MLK crime scenes were all quickly destroyed after those conspiracy/cover-up assassinations as well. You might remember how the FBI hosed down the Thomas Crooks scene last summer immediately after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Rapid destruction of a high-profile assassination crime scene is a tell-tale sign of a cover-up. That is the simplest/Occam's Razor explanation here. I'm sure they'll all say they just meant well and wanted to honor Charlie, or maybe they'll say that given the circumstances it wasn't the best choice, in hindsight, to act so soon after. Perhaps they'll say that whoever said it was scheduled maintenance spoke in error. Etc. If we had a real uncompromised FBI & law enforcement, they'd question Daniel & all involved in this debacle and search their records to see if any clues could be found that lead back to the perps. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts a recent experience triggered by a call he received about a week and a half prior from a pair of maintenance workers from the state of Utah. Those workers had been asked to replace or beautify an area that had been the site of a fatal shooting involving a brother. The speaker explains that although it was a Sunday—when he normally does not work—he felt compelled to be useful and responded to the request. He describes showing up not alone, but accompanied by a couple of his brothers, with whom he shares a community or brotherhood. He emphasizes that these companions come from differing beliefs and differing viewpoints, and yet, together, they were able to be useful in the task at hand. The speaker underscores the weight and emotional heaviness of engaging in work in a place where a brother had been gunned down, acknowledging the gravity of the environment and the purpose of their presence there. In sharing this experience, the speaker notes that he had intended to make a post about what happened but had not wanted to stir controversy. He frames the event within a broader principle: America is founded on people with different beliefs working together. He asserts that what they did on that Sunday and the following Monday was an embodiment of that founding principle, a practical demonstration of collaboration across differences. Despite the positive intention and the collaborative effort, the speaker reveals that he has been receiving hate online as a result of sharing the story. He mentions that some of the feedback has taken the form of fake reviews, suggesting an attempt to undermine or discredit the post or the effort. In response to the adversity and hostility, the speaker asserts a response or philosophy: the answer to hate is love, and the answer to falsehood is truth. Across the narrative, the speaker connects practical action with civic and moral ideals, describing a weekend of service in a difficult setting, performed with people who did not share identical beliefs but shared a commitment to being useful and respectful in a moment of tragedy. He closes by reiterating the core message about love overcoming hate and truth countering falsehood, tying the personal act of service to a larger claim about how to engage with disagreement and controversy in the public sphere.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's up, guys? Hey. I just wanna share a quick post here. I got a call about a week and a half ago from a couple of, couple of maintenance guys from the state of Utah that had been asked to replace, to beautify an area where a brother had been gunned down. It was Sunday, I usually don't work on Sunday, but I needed to be useful. And so I showed up with a couple of my brother, with a couple of other brothers that we all have differing beliefs and differing viewpoints, and together we were useful. It was heavy to work where a brother was gunned down, but we did it. And I've wanted to make a post. I haven't wanted to be controversial. America is founded on people with different beliefs working together. That's exactly what we did that Sunday and that Monday. And, I'm getting some hate online for it. I'm getting some fake reviews. And, you know, the answer to hate is love. The answer to falsehood is truth.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 15, 2025 at 12:03 AM
Saved - October 16, 2025 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user alleges someone infiltrated a political space, extorted others by weaponizing dirt, and canceled speakers by exposing their free speech. Accusers challenge Sam’s credibility, claim he lied about keeping MaxNard0 out, and accuse him of complicity for money. Respondents amplify distrust, call the claims bullshit, and say the broader lists Sam is on are now known.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

What if I told you a jew infiltrated a political space, got dirt on someone & used it for extortion to gain access to peoples' free speech, then exposed those peoples' free speech in order to get them canceled? https://t.co/bsex6DAtrr

@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes

Seriously fuck Gavin Wax. Should be immediately blacklisted from any political circle. Zero tolerance for friendly fire.

@Wolfsschanze420 - Uncle WhiteWolfsschanze

@BasedSamParker You lied about keeping .@MaxNard0 out of your space the other day, Sam -- Max being the smartest dude with facts & receipts on X. Saying it was some kind of "glitch." Why did you lie, Sam? You're a suspect now, Sam. You failed the Max litmus test. You're complicit. For shekels...

@KettyLuvz - KettyLove

@Wolfsschanze420 @BasedSamParker @MaxNard0 💯 It was absolute bullshit! They know it. We know it. Let's take a look at the lists he's on. https://t.co/LhxbSWWI9L

@Wolfsschanze420 - Uncle WhiteWolfsschanze

@KettyLuvz @BasedSamParker @MaxNard0 Holy shit. Now we ALL know it.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 14, 2025 at 5:17 AM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 1:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
One participant cites a glitchy space and says public accusations of working for Israel led him to consider restricting the other, noting he hosts many spaces and hasn’t singled anyone out. The other insists he was tagged multiple times and argues the ongoing “George Zinn” issue connects to a Microsoft/AIG/Israeli operation, rejecting the accusation.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Didn't even see your requests, Bro. The space was glitchy af and crashed twice outside of our control. But I'll tell you what, a real great way to not get into one of my spaces is to attack me publicly on the timeline and accuse me of working for israel. I've done hundreds of spaces over the last 2 years and probably brought up thousands of speakers. I've not singled you out for special censorship. But now maybe I will.

@MaxNard0 - Max Nardo

By “they’ll muzzle”, do you mean you? Is that why you and @BasedSamParker ignored my mic request for 45 mins in your “Charlie Kirk | Updates” space today, but gave a mic to Matt Baker and some South African dipshit nobody’s heard of? Did Botha, Ackman and Likud make that call? https://t.co/aCMJ023Dqv

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

They'll muzzle and bury anyone daring to call out Israel's slaughter as the genocide it is, they get deplatformed, demonized, and disappeared in a digital prison. But Fauci, the bloodstained butcher behind the COVID death machine, gets the red carpet, his venomous voice blasted https://t.co/PoKYfIzLUT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker1 argues that 'government hates you' and describes a 'humiliation ritual.' They accuse 'Doctor Death' of 'convincing you to go inject a chemical clot shot' and of 'targeting the black neighborhood specifically' with a '$50 gift card to Amazon.' They reference 'the decades and a half of research' in institute work that led to the mRNA platform technology and the work on immunogen design, originally work that started with HIV immunogens, claiming this produced a vaccine 'less than eleven months from the time the sequence was available.' The rant says the aim is to break and deplatform, noting 'how many people in America have been deplatformed' and that elections are rigged. It promotes Bitcoin as 'delivering private property rights' and 'the first thing in all of humanity that man has ever created that cannot be corrupted,' with '21,000,000' total and '210,000... own one whole Bitcoin.' It accuses 'the bankers, the Jews that control all of this' and condemns FDA, geoengineering, and poisoned food, urging listeners to wake up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's talk about how much your government hates you, shall we? So take a look at this. Doctor Fauci is back in the press, you have to start asking yourself. Okay. Probably one of the most hated men in America outside of Bill Gates. Fair to say. I think we can all kind of agree. Two very hated people in America. Well, Netanyahu's up there, but people that are actually in America. Okay? You have doctor Death. The man that was literally convincing you to go inject a chemical clot shot. This dude was going around to the black neighborhood specifically, targeting the black youth and targeting black black families to inject your children and your family with a chemical cocktail offering you a $50 gift card to Amazon. K? Why would anybody platform him? Speaker 1: If you look at the decades and a half of research that my institute, when I was the director, put into funding the work that led to the mRNA platform technology and the work that was done on immunogen design, which was originally work that started with HIV immunogens, namely to get the right confirmation of the envelope protein, that same technique of getting the right stable confirmation of the spike protein of COVID, you put those two together, the mRNA technology, immunogen design, and you get a vaccine that was available for people less than eleven months from the time the sequence was available. Speaker 0: You have to start really thinking to yourself, why? Who would give this man a microphone and why? Okay. Now the next point I wanna go is it's to humiliate you. It's to outrage you. They want you to hate them. They want you to lash out. They want you to break. So when they break you, you get arrested, you get charges, you get deplatformed, and they're gonna take away your microphone, which is what they do to me. How many people in America have been deplatformed, demonetized, and had our microphones taken away? But one of the most evil, sick, satanic murderers in the entire world, There's been very few people who are directly responsible for the death of more people than this one man right here, and he's now being given a platform. He's now being walked out in front of the audience. Last we knew, he was getting his he had still had secret service details. He had a private security detail that was bought and funded with our tax dollars even after they removed him from the CDC. He was still on the government payroll. And we're over here working our fucking asses off. We're debt slaves. We're trapped in mountains of fucking debt. We have credit card debt up the fucking ass. Our car is getting ready to get repossessed. Our fucking homes are getting four fucking closed on. We're skipping practices with our children because we gotta work fucking two jobs to try to dig ourselves out of a debt out of a debt that was fucking created by our government. Your government has been depreciating the value of the dollar at such a rate that no matter how much you work or how hard you work or how often you get a raise, it's never enough. Your standards of living are never fucking changing. And why is that? It's because our government hates us, and it's a giant humiliation ritual. They're not trying to better your life. They are literally here to break you, humiliate you, de degrade you. They want you to feel like a fucking third class citizen in your own country. And that's what happens when your elections are rigged. That's what happens when your government no longer represents you. And that's why I keep warning everybody, if you're not getting your wealth out of this country, if you're not putting your assets into Bitcoin and preparing for the absolute worst, you can't see the writing on the walls. You're asleep at the gosh damn wheel. And I'm just over here just just pounding the drum, pounding the drum. Wake the fuck up, guys. Wake the fuck up. Look at, dude. Get your wealth out. Get it into Bitcoin. And here, I've been screaming it for the last, what, at least three years on national fucking TV. Was on Elevate TV, my second show, screaming buy Bitcoin at 20,000. I was screaming in at thirty, screaming in at fifty. At 78 or 79, I put it in my Twitter bio, buying Bitcoin at 78,000 will be the opportunity of a lifetime. And then it crashed down to 65, and everybody's like, bro, you're gonna take you're gonna change your Twitter bio? I'm no. Like, You don't fucking get it. We have a saying in the Bitcoin world. Right? For people that save in fiat currency. You know what? We call them fucking poor. We laugh at you. We mock you. We humiliate. You are usually humiliating yourself. If you own 0 Bitcoin, the amount of Bitcoin you own today will dictate the amount of freedom that you have in the future. Understand this. Bitcoin is delivering private property fucking rights to every gosh damn human on the planet. You are priced out of owning real estate. Your children will never be able to buy real estate. So how are they ever going to invest in finding the investment vehicle that's going to help maybe give them a shot at escaping the matrix? It sure is fucking at their four zero one k. You cannot put money into your four zero one k until you die. Your parents who slave their fucking this is what should piss you off the fucking most. Your parents that raised you right, they're middle class citizens, they went out, they got a good job, they put money in their four zero one k, they're 65, their bodies are falling apart because of the poison and toxic fucking food that our government has allowed. The the FDA has allowed them to inject into every piece of food that we eat. They're fucking poisoning our skies with chemical engine geoengineering. They're poisoning our waters. They're poisoning our food fucking sources. And now your parents, their bodies are fucking falling apart. How many people do you know that have diabetes? How many people do you know that have gotten cancer? How many people do you know that have some type of critical illness and they're fucking addicted to whatever cure that or whatever temporary treatment big pharma is going to give them? Do you think this was by accident? Do you think this just just happened? No. It didn't just happen. Your government designed it that way. The system is designed for you to fucking fail. And I'm over here saying, guys, I'm in the fucking winner's circle. Right? There's Bitcoin. There's this entire world over here. We won the war. It's the bankers, the Jews that control all of this, and it all revolves around their ability to print money and devalue the wealth of your fucking your nation. When the game is so rigged that no matter how you play it, you lose, your only option is to not play the game. Bitcoin is not only delivering private property rights to every single human on the face of the earth. It is also the first thing in all of humanity that man has ever created that cannot be corrupted. Think about that. Everything from the FDA to the CIA, the NSA, every government organization, the US dollar, gold, silver, real estate, it has all been corrupted and it's all been manipulated. Bitcoin is the only true asset that is so scarce and so such a genius design behind its mechanisms, behind its mechanics, behind its open source code that it can't be corrupted. And you don't own any of it? Listen to yourself. Think about that. This asset is the first asset in all of human existence, in all of humanity that man has ever created that cannot be corrupted. There's only 21,000,000 of them that will ever be created, and you own none. And there's only 210,000 people in the entire world that own one whole Bitcoin. So as you watch everything get demonetized into Bitcoin, as you watch Bitcoin go from a 100,000 to 200 to 500 to a million, are you gonna be the person at a million going, I wish I would have bought it. I had the opportunity to buy it at a 100. Or are you gonna be the idiot that's it's I should have bought it when it was a thousand. It's a 100,000 now. I missed the boat. No, you idiot. The boat's still fucking on the shore. We haven't even un beached yet. We haven't even hit left the dock. You're just you've just been brainwashed into believing that this thing there's no value and I don't understand it. Well, no shit. If everybody understood it was that easy to understand, it would be fucking $5,000,000,000 right now. Your opportunity is the fact that it takes twenty hours to learn just to basically buy it. Twenty hours you got to do research. And then it's a hundred and twenty hours of doing research and studying it understanding it, trading it, and making mistakes. Probably gonna lose a little bit of money because you're stupid and naive but eventually it's gonna get drilled in. It's gonna get it's gonna get drilled home and you're gonna own it. You're gonna you're gonna you're gonna you're gonna custody it in a way that no government can ever take it from you and that is what true freedom is. When you have the ability to say, you know what? Fuck you. I don't need your money. I don't need your job. I don't need to fucking rely on any income. I don't really need to rely on your fucking citizenship. I don't need shit. I'll fucking take my happy ass and I'll go to another fucking country and I will live off the interest of my Bitcoin alone and I will live like a fucking king. That's freedom. Your ability to say fuck you, fuck this government, fuck this country. I'm gonna do what's best for my family, and I can do what I want, when I want, however the fuck I want, I just might not be able to do it in America. Good fucking riddance. That's what freedom is, guys, and that's what you should be chasing. Not this fucking trapped in a nine to five debt based rat race cycle while your fucking government's trying to inject fucking chemical cocktails into fucking every aspect of your life. And you got doctor dickhead over here lecturing you over here bragging about AIDS. This motherfucker created AIDS and then he injected it into the fucking black community. Then he went out and kidnapped a bunch of fucking black orphans and then fucking ran ran AIDS test on them because they failed one of his his PSC test or whatever the fuck it was that came back false positives. So these kids that didn't have AIDS, he was running them like little rats and guinea pigs. There's a whole graveyard of orphans in fucking New York City that this scumbag fucking slaughtered. And he's over here on the fucking 05:00 news. Humiliation ritual. Your government hates you. Wake the fuck up.

@MaxNard0 - Max Nardo

@BasedSamParker I literally fucking tagged you multiple times in posts, and Ryan, and had others too. The George Zinn shit is not going away, and it’s arguably the single thing that irrevocably ties this to a Microsoft/AIG/Israeli operation. I don’t play that fucking bullshit, Sam. You know me.

BasedSamParker
Posted - August 23, 2025 at 2:41 AM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 8:24 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

In 1960, about 70% of White America descended from pre-1790 Founding White Stock. About 80% descended from pre-Civil War. We're NOT a "Nation of Immigrants." https://t.co/bAJoPqglug

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Ban all Non White immigration, period. White countries for White people.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 7:18 AM
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 8:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe a possible muzzle flash sighting before the gunshot at Utah Valley University, arguing the ball of light may blaze from the Sorensen Center roof. I include a rough layout of locations, link the source video, and address objections (bird, bug) with several reasons the light isn’t likely. I note others’ reactions and invite better visualization with improved gear.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then that puts the kill shot being fired from the roof of the Sorensen Center. Such a trajectory better matches the analysis of Charlie Kirk's wound arrived at independently by both @chrismartenson & Baron Coleman (YouTube, H/T: Baron's eagle eyes). At the end of the video, I've included a rough layout analysis of the locations & trajectories. In the next tweet below, I'll link the source video.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is so much so." "Before we had a flag and we had" "it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in" "the camera made us move. What was that?" "Just a so much so." "It's too crowded." "It's just there's just so much." "As you can see, this new trajectory places a shooter on the roof of the Sorenson Center, and the shot would come at a much steeper down angle and a much larger angle off of the perpendicular, such that a bullet entering Charlie's neck would hit his spine and glance downward into his chest cavity, killing him instantly."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is so much so. Speaker 1: Before we had a flag and we had Speaker 2: it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 3: the camera made us move. What was that? Speaker 0: Just a so much so. Speaker 1: Before we had a flag and we had it Speaker 2: so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 4: the camera Speaker 3: and made us move. What was that? Speaker 1: It's too crowded. Speaker 0: It's just there's just so much. Speaker 1: So Before we had a flag and we had Speaker 2: it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 4: the camera. It made Speaker 3: us move. What was that? Speaker 0: It's just there's just so much so much. Speaker 1: We had a flag, Speaker 2: and we had it so it's positioned above the tent so it would Speaker 4: be in the camp. Speaker 5: As you can see, this new trajectory places a shooter on the roof of the Sorenson Center, and the shot would come at a much steeper down angle and a much larger angle off of the perpendicular, such that a bullet entering Charlie's neck would hit his spine and glance downward into his chest cavity, killing him instantly.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Source video. Shot occurs at about 19:07 minutes. https://t.co/hxXXN8Inxm

@lifeisdriving - Adam Bartholomew 🗨️

Full HD re-upload of today's events at Utah Valley University. Charlie Kirk assassination shooting and aftermath. https://t.co/CVlBLwnTVQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
At Utah Valley University, during a Turning Point USA event with Charlie Kirk, livestreamers described gear and interviewed people about politics and love. Signs read "free Palestine, love one another" and "Gay pride." Then: "There has been a shooting." Eyewitnesses reported "Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck" and described "blood protruding" as security yelled. "'Active crime scene' and 'They arrested a guy' were noted, with speculation of 'a guy on the roof.' Police evacuated the campus; witnesses recalled hearing a 'higher caliber' shot and a possible sniper. The area was cleared, and attendees were moved to safety as authorities investigated. Reporters captured reactions, prayers for Charlie, and confusion over security and organization as the event ended in tragedy."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Like an hour. Okay. So I'm just like standing there. Speaker 1: Protest side. So, like, this is the patriot side over here. Gonna head over to the protest side with the gate flags. All that stuff. Gotta go say hi to all the allies. Nothing over here? No. All places where you can get anywhere close. What's up, you guys? You guys excited to see Charlie Kirk? No. No. What are you doing here? Kabooming. Yeah. Yeah. Is that your camera? We don't really like the This is the camera right here. Oh. We don't really like the That should be Yeah. That's a pretty lightweight setup. Thanks, man. Yeah. I got the team there. Are you here for the You're in the backpack. Personal stuff for one. Jamie okay. What is it? It your Instagram? I'm just backpack? It's all right here. So this is your router. A I router in the backpack. Oh, so you you oh, can can you you do the live stream? Yeah. I'm streaming right now. That's the camera? That's the camera. Yeah. With the heat. That's your recorder of your voice. This is the audio captured. Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones. Can get it for you? Yeah. I just don't remember what that is. I've seen I've seen small ones, but I I see them in some This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it it'll help over that transmitter. Transmitter. Really? Can you put that up next and answer? Yeah. Just so I can Speaker 2: Yep. How much is it? Speaker 1: This. K. Hope that took a picture. That's really tiny. Yeah. I like it. Where's your wind strap? That's what I It's in my backpack. I gotta get it out of So that's your monitor and this y'all is this one where you recorder? Is is the is the SD in there or SD in here? I can record to this, the SD in this, and stream at the same time. Wow. According to everything. Wow. So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, know. Who makes that camera? Speaker 0: It's Logitech. Logitech. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's an It's a it's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I'll have to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube like this big and it has a micro four thirds and Wow. And you're changing our battery. You're changing my master key. Know. Speaker 3: And I turn around Watch Speaker 1: a tech. I've heard that company, but Yeah. They're mostly surveillance cameras. Cameras. Mostly like keyboards and mouse. Think they bought these guys. Evo camera. So it's a it's a bigger version of that with micro four thirds lenses. Yes. Yeah. I love that one. I don't wanna bring it here. Yeah. Yeah. You do interviews. Is that it? Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Do interviews. Is a Hey. Thanks, man. There we go. Now I can control it. Fuck you, Charlie. Fuck you, Charlie. There you go. If you wanted to know about my setup, like, I asked all the right questions. What's going on, man? Speaker 0: America. Speaker 1: I don't approve that he's condoning someone who's pushing The US to become more authoritarian and is violating the constitution every which way. Speaker 2: He confused a dolphin fetus with a human fetus. Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk did? Yeah. He did. What? Say that again? Speaker 2: He confused a dolphin fetus with a human fetus. Yeah. I'm like a Speaker 1: When argument. When was this? It was during a He Speaker 2: was asked, is this a he was asked, is this a baby? And showed a picture of a dolphin fetus. He said, without a doubt. And the guy got him. Speaker 1: Boo, Charlie Kirk. When do you think life begins? I got it. No idea? I don't know. And for that reason, Speaker 3: I think we shouldn't force people Speaker 1: to do this. That's why we chose Speaker 2: the choice to make the choice. Speaker 1: Gotcha. What about you? Speaker 0: I agree with both of what they have said and I think that believing that life believes believing that life starts at conception is I mean, can you can you look at that and define that that is a life? I feel like you could say that then life starts before when it's conceived in your head. Like, is life I don't know. You can you can vary the definition and I'm Okay. Speaker 1: This is Speaker 0: why I'm not debating him. How far are you willing to push the law? Yeah. Speaker 3: I I'm not, like, I don't want other people Speaker 1: What if we said, like, when when vocal cords were developed in the in the fetus that if it was old enough that if it were taken out of the womb, it'd be screaming. Would would that be when life has begun? Speaker 3: I mean, would say, like, I I can't physically, like, like, conceive, like, a a child in my own body, so I'm not gonna, like, like, put pressure on other people. They can, like, have their own opinions, I'm and not gonna force Speaker 1: I mean, just for, like, biology reasons for, like, where it's we're UV UVU here. So, like, when would you consider that life begins? Speaker 0: I mean, we can argue semantics all day. Speaker 1: I was just curious what your Yeah. We can say what do you say genocide. Disagree with Charlie, so I was wondering what your what your side was. My opinion is people should just have the freedom Speaker 4: to do their own thing, Speaker 1: especially when we don't have a defined thing. Because if you make rules without a thing that is defined, then that's when you get into issues because you're controlling people's choices based on something that we're not a 100% sure of. That's the whole point we're trying to make. Fair enough. Can you hold up your shines, guys? Yes, sir. Don't legalize racism. What's that one mean? Speaker 3: It's, based on the recent supreme court decision to, allow people to, be deported purely based on, skin color or even like a slight suspicion based on, like, speaking Spanish or Speaker 1: The supreme court said they could deport people based off their skin color? Speaker 0: Supreme court said that they are That they did This is grounds for, like, reasonable Detect Yeah. It's reasonable suspicion, which means they can be detained. You can Speaker 1: What was grounds for it? Color of the skin? Speaker 3: Color color of the skin, speaking Spanish or speaking with The accent. Speaker 1: I I haven't heard this, so I have to look that up. Speaker 0: This was, like It was, like, literally two days ago. Speaker 1: Yeah. Just two days ago. Okay. What's your sign say? Speaker 0: My sign says free Palestine, love one another. Free Palestine, there's a genocide. Speaker 1: There's What's what's that referencing to love one another? Speaker 0: Love one another is referencing the bible. It's referencing Jesus' teachings. I like, I'm a Christian. I don't know much about Christianity. I struggle with it a lot. But recently, I I feel like there's been not enough love in the world. I feel like there's been so much hate even here. All of these people out there, I might disagree with most of them, but I still love them for who they are, and I respect a lot of the opinions they have. That's what that's representing. Speaker 3: And it it's like love one another isn't just a Christian concept. That's a human concept. Speaker 0: That's a human concept. Speaker 3: We should like be accepting, and we should love other people. Speaker 2: I'm very atheist. I believe in that. I'm very atheist. I believe in that wholeheartedly. Speaker 1: Okay. Society doesn't work without us loving each other and getting along. Otherwise, there's just disputes and conflicts and it gets ugly. Okay. So you got the rainbow pin on there? Yep. What's that mean? Speaker 0: Gay pride. Speaker 1: Gay pride. Speaker 2: High school LGBTQ plus. Speaker 1: Okay. Would you guys go support gay pride in Palestine? So Speaker 0: yes. In Palestine, a lot Speaker 1: of people will that be something you guys would be willing to do in person? Speaker 0: I feel like, no. I'd get bombed. I'd get killed. Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't that I don't live in Palestine also. So Okay. I do it here because I live here. Speaker 5: You know? Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. A lot of people bring up the argument that in Palestine, it's not legal to be gay. It is not legal like, people love to Yeah. I've heard that a lot. Yeah. I've heard that a lot too. And my I I I just believe that they still should not be mass murdered. Their children shouldn't be killed at the age of zero. Speaker 1: We also don't condone Hamas either. We don't think that's alright. Speaker 0: We're not yeah. We're not supporting terrorists. Speaker 1: Say say that one more time real quick. We also don't condone Hamas. We think that genocide's wrong on both sides. We're just saying that Speaker 0: we're not advocating Israel as the one Speaker 1: that's doing the most part. Speaker 0: We're we're pro Jewish people and pro Palestinian people. Speaker 1: Just think people should live and people have a right to live. Speaker 3: And that and that's kind of back to like the love one another thing. It's like love everyone. Speaker 0: Love everyone. Regardless. Regardless of race. Speaker 1: Well, thanks guys. Appreciate you guys coming out here. Speaker 0: Alright. We appreciate you. Speaker 1: Love you too. Down and see the get closer. Are they, like, restricting you guys up here or what? Speaker 2: No. It's too crowded. Speaker 0: It's just there's just so much so much. Speaker 1: Before we had a flag and shooting. There's been a shooting. We heard shots we heard shots. You guys okay? Yeah. K. Love you. Be safe. K. Be safe. Bye. Apparently, he's been a shooting. I don't know who's been shot. We are here live at Utah Valley State University. There's been a shooting at the Charlie Kirk event, the TP USA event. There has been a shooting. Everybody's evacuating. I don't know if that was shots or if that was fireworks, to be honest, but How are doing, sir? Good. How are you doing? Were you able to see anything that happened? I was standing right here interviewing people. Hang on. Charlie Kirk got shot? Holy shit. Charlie Kirk got shot in the neck is what my kid is saying. Your kid's saying Charlie? Yeah. Oh my goodness. My son is down there. He says that Charlie Kirk has been shot in the neck. This is unconfirmed. This is for my son who was down there right in front of Charlie Kirk. We're gonna go down there and see if we can get any more info. My son just said Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck. I don't know the accuracy of that. You guys okay? We're doing together. Sorry. No. Stay. Abby, are you inside or out here? My son just said that on the phone. Yeah. Take your pill. He got shot down. Over there. It sounded like, to me, like, came from up there. Sound like a sharpshooter? Dude. He just got shot. Hey. What happened? We have multiple eyewitnesses saying that Charlie Kirk has been shot in the neck, and that they saw blood spray. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk You have to leave. You need to leave. Yes, sir. Now quit. Get him out. You go right now. Out of here. Hey. Hey. He's out. He's he's out. He made it out. He's fine. He's out. He made it out. He's fine. He's looking for you. He's looking for you. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on a second. Where are you located? Work your way around to me. Hello? The Love and Tolerance crowd. Speaker 5: Oh, yeah. I saw them evaporate soon. Do Speaker 1: you know where So apparently, this photographer that was just right here in front of my camera got a picture of the guy that was arrested. He was looking for the he's heading to the UVU police to to give them that picture. You where where were you at? Speaker 5: I was just over there in that little structure area. I was Speaker 1: Tell me what happened. Speaker 5: So I was at first, I started off maybe thirty seconds before the shot, walking up the stairs all the way to the side of the bridge underpass area because I was looking for the line to ask him a question. It came to our attention that the line was on the other side. So I went around and ended just by the structure thing. And that's when we heard the gunshot. Speaker 1: Wow. Do you know where she is? She's in the Sorenson Center. Sorenson Center. Stay with me. Somebody got a picture of the guy that got arrested. Is that the guy they they cuffed? Apparently. I don't know. So I was up there on the balcony. Guy down there. They cuffed and hauled off. There was a guy down here getting video. There was people up there videoing down that that definitely must have got a a, you know, a wide out angle. Did you hear that he got hit for sure? My son here told Speaker 5: me hitting the neck or the chest? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 5: I've heard mostly the neck, but I've heard chest a couple times. Speaker 1: There's one of the I talked to one of officers. He got he said he got hit hard. I just pray it's in his shoulder. Yeah. That's almost like it was set up because the second speaker was the one talking about guns. And then the next thing you know Yeah. That must be You know what I mean? Yeah. That does sound fishy. He's a close friend of my brother's. Where's the Sorenson Center, Liam? Sorenson Speaker 5: Center is down in there. Hi. Speaker 1: Can we get to your backpack? Come here. You guys see what happened? Yeah. Kinda. Kinda. Would willing you to talk about it on camera? Hey. How you doing? You came out. Wait. So you can swing. Speaker 4: I'm okay. Kinda shocked. Speaker 1: I'm Definitely shocking. We're here at the Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA event. What can you just tell me briefly what happened in your in your eyes? Speaker 4: Well, my name's Eric. I was standing about the third level back, so probably 50 feet from Charlie. I heard a shot which took my attention away from Charlie. And when I looked back at him after after the echoes, there was there was blood protruding from his neck or his head about six inches or more, literally gushing out. Speaker 1: Of his neck? Speaker 4: Neck or head. I'm not quite sure because his head was tilted back. I don't think he's gonna survive this shot if you want my opinion. Unbelievable. I think he got hit in a very vital spot. Speaker 1: It seemed like it was a up close shooter or a long range. Any any idea Speaker 4: I don't know. I it sounded like a higher Speaker 1: It sounded like Speaker 4: a caliber. It sounded like a higher caliber, like a nine millimeter. It didn't sound like a 45 or anything, but I don't know. It didn't sound that deep to me. It almost sounded like a cherry bomb. Unbelievable. Speaker 1: A gunshot. Wow. That's Wow. I'm in shock. I am too. Speaker 4: I am too. I can't believe it happened in Utah of all places. In all places. Larry has so much support, but, obviously, the opposition was here. And now we're looking at a murder scene possibly. It's for obviously, a crime scene, but I don't think that Charlie can survive this unless the EMTs were close. And it was it was pretty, I mean, rated r level kind of stuff. Speaker 1: Wow. Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, Speaker 1: thank you. I appreciate your your best one. Speaker 4: You bet. Thank you. You too. Speaker 1: I was up on the balcony interviewing the love and tolerance crowd that just happened. Alrighty. The way. You're aware? Did you guys see what happened? Not really. We had kinda heard what happened, but we heard it was real. We're probably maybe 20 feet away. You guys here to hear Charlie speak? Or Yeah. We were. Sure. Well, prayers prayers to him. We well, what a coincidence that he was talking about gun violence, Speaker 2: and then all of a Speaker 1: sudden this happens. Like, what the hell? That's what somebody else told me over there. Like, come on, bro. Like, it's like, what what are the chances of this shit happening to here, bro? Like, it's scary. Like terrifying. It's freak it freaks everyone out. Like, it just ruins the whole experience for everyone. Like, I don't know. Like, come on, bro. Now they got this whole place on lockdown. But stuff. Scary stuff. I'm glad glad no one else got hurt. Pray for Charlie. Yeah. Pray for Charlie. Thanks, guys. Speaker 3: An organizer closer to Charlie's position said he was shot Speaker 0: in the neck. Speaker 1: We still don't know yet. I'm still Well, no. Here comes the ARs Recorded the shot. Yeah. Send your It's first thing you know. Yeah. Did you guys see what happened? That's crazy. Was it like a loud light? It was loud. Alright, everybody. You need to leave the area all the way up and all the way to the South or the north. Push the button in there. This is this is all pricing. I'm just gonna switch it. Okay. So active crime scene. Keep they're telling everybody to get out of here. We are going to comply. The police said it could have come from up on the roof, but they arrested a guy up down right in front of Charlie, so there might have been it could have been. I'm not really sure. Yeah. I've been on the phone with John, but I've been on phone tender. So he's he's coming to me. We don't know. We're out of here. We're gonna be out of See what happened? Did you guys see what happened? Speaker 0: Yes. I saw him. Speaker 2: What's are you recording this? Speaker 1: Yes. You're live right now. Well, we're we're recording. I don't know if we're live because of the cell service. Hang on. Speaker 2: Standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit. I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Speaker 1: Get Speaker 2: off me. You had to off me. Speaker 1: Motions are running high right now. This guy says a man died today. This is unconfirmed. That's what this eyewitness testimony just said. Everybody's in shock, including myself. Where's your mama? Okay. Say that again. Okay. Let's go. Let's go this. Let's just go with everybody else. Unbelievable. Somebody could be so offended by the words coming out of a guy's mouth. I mean, just unbelievable. Sad day today. Speaker 4: Holy cow. Speaker 1: Terrifying and sad what this has come to. Two protests in a row have been shootings at me, but this is absolutely ridiculous. Hello? Yeah. Hi, guys. Dad, we are outside the student life in alongside. Yeah. We're gonna take off. But I You know why I'm a part of These people running again? Are you sure? They escorted us this way. I see what happened. Speaker 2: Are you? Speaker 1: Did you see what happened, Phil? No. I was pretty yeah. I'm We heard live at Utah Valley University, the site of an unbelievable tragedy that just happened involving Charlie Kirk at the Turning Point USA event. Shots rang out. We got police running in still. There must be something going on for these cops to be running in like this. Campus is being evacuated. You know what's going on? We're trying to get to the vehicle. Up this? Yeah. K. Pull this. This? Yeah. We're about ready to try to out of here real soon. K. I'm just getting out of your way here. Sorry. You guys doing a reporting from here? Yes. Not here not from here. No. You know if they got the first or not? I heard they had a guy arrested, but then the cops just all were rushing back in. They were saying somebody one of the cops said there might be a guy on the roof. Speaker 5: Oh, really? So Speaker 1: And then and then a bunch of them just came in, and they just evacuated the building. Speaker 5: So I saw a cop on that roof right over there. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yep. K. Drive safe, guys. Hey. Where's your mom? She's in the water. K. Pull. K. Pull back. Whatever this building is right here, these are all over actively clearing this building, looking through every storage shed. Something's going down here. It's looking like this might have been a sniper outpost up here on this building possibly because that would be the only spot to reach down to the courtyard. And the cops are up here searching every nook and cranny of this building. Let's see if we can get around her car. Where's your mom? Are still in the parking lot? Are your keys with her? K. Are are your keys with you? K. We're hacked. We're gonna we're circling around the North side to go to my car. We'll meet you in the parking lot. K. Bye. Speaker 5: How's how's that? I heard your audio or something, maybe. Speaker 1: What did it say? He said He said, are you at UVU? Are you okay? I said, yeah. I'm fine. He said, I'm sorry to leave. I'm listening to the radio right now, and they're playing a recording that is maybe from your dad. I'm not a 100% sure. Cecily was teaching up in the Fine Arts Building, and she got evacuated. What's up, guys? Okay. Walk beside me and carry this. Speaker 5: I'm watching yours. I pulled Speaker 1: up your screen, and I'm looking to see if you got the guy. What'd you say? Oh, okay. Speaker 5: It says it cut your screen an hour ago, though. Speaker 1: I'm assuming you've got Yeah. No. Speaker 6: I don't wanna be on. Speaker 1: No. Okay. Well, you just get your audio. Can I get your voice so I can get your testimony? Pointing that way on the camera. Speaker 6: Well, there was no security. They let I bought I mean, I got tickets, and they didn't even take the tickets to get us in. They just let everybody in there. So there was no there was no no police, no no security I Speaker 1: walked in with tripods sticking out of my backpack. No problem. Right right through the door. Speaker 6: I know. There was no no security at all. That's what makes me really mad. And then I I looked up the ticket, got the tickets, and they didn't even take our tickets. Speaker 1: Did guys see what happened? Speaker 6: Yeah. We saw the whole thing. Oh, man. Speaker 1: You please tell me what what you saw? Speaker 6: I just saw it. We just saw him up there talking, and then I heard the gunshot, and then we saw him fall. Speaker 1: You think it was, like, a close-up gun or a smack roof? Speaker 6: You know what? It came out to my right. I was right in the center on the top level, it came out the right side. Speaker 1: Here we have somebody worry about COVID. We're heading your way. We're on the North End. You're gonna end the stream now. We'll fire it back up if if you run into anything.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Answering objections: https://t.co/wfyHpbLzzd

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Answering objections to the muzzle flash theory: some are saying it's a bird or a bug. Let's analyze. 1. It's too small and perfectly linear to be a bird. 2. It doesn't traverse the entire tree as a bug flying would, only a limited section. A short distance. It appears, then disappears, all from inside the width of the tree. 3. It's partially occluded by the tree, showing up in certain portions along a straight line, but not others — just as a light showing through a tree would behave: partially shining through. A bug would show up uniformly start to finish. 4. If it's somewhere around the tree, It's traveling VERY fast, perhaps roughly 50 ft/sec or more. No bug flies that fast. 5. It moves across a perfectly straight line, with a streaky quality. 6. The trajectory lines up with the edge of the roof. Someone with better equipment then me could get a better visualization of whatever this is.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then

Video Transcript AI Summary
As you can see, this new trajectory places a shooter on the roof of the Sorenson Center, and the shot would come at a much steeper down angle and a much larger angle off of the perpendicular, such that a bullet entering Charlie's neck would hit his spine and glance downward into his chest cavity, killing him instantly. "Before we had a flag and we had" "it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in" "the camera" "and made us move. What was that?" "It's too crowded." "It's just there's just so much." "This is so much so."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is so much so. Speaker 1: Before we had a flag and we had Speaker 2: it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 3: the camera made us move. What was that? Speaker 0: Just a so much so. Speaker 1: Before we had a flag and we had it Speaker 2: so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 4: the camera Speaker 3: and made us move. What was that? Speaker 1: It's too crowded. Speaker 0: It's just there's just so much. Speaker 1: So Before we had a flag and we had Speaker 2: it so it's positioned above the tent so it'd be in Speaker 4: the camera. It made Speaker 3: us move. What was that? Speaker 0: It's just there's just so much so much. Speaker 1: We had a flag, Speaker 2: and we had it so it's positioned above the tent so it would Speaker 4: be in the camp. Speaker 5: As you can see, this new trajectory places a shooter on the roof of the Sorenson Center, and the shot would come at a much steeper down angle and a much larger angle off of the perpendicular, such that a bullet entering Charlie's neck would hit his spine and glance downward into his chest cavity, killing him instantly.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@EFDisGuy Right? I'm not just seeing things!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Jones81019 There's either a problem with the audio/video encoding or the footage has seen altered since this came from a re-upload. Obviously, the bystanders can't react before the sound reaches them. Something is amiss.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LaurieLemuria "i didn't see anything but I know it was a bug." I see you, Laurie. https://t.co/JQsylSdKtg

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GreatLakesDavid 🧐🤔 Interesting theory!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@VoxExVeritas Tracks way better

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@m_mallette Yep! Demons!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@explosivo412 Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ShaunKhan349 I fear it's compromised and he's not going to get a robust defense.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@edsnow8 The President of the United States of America Lol

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 12, 2025 at 6:28 PM
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that Charlie Kirk was Israel’s greatest ally because he fought anti-BDS laws, opposed social media censorship of anti-Israel content on TikTok, and challenged the ADL’s role. Israel saw these moves as existential threats and aimed to recapture American youth and curb dissent. After his death, TikTok censorship intensified and pro-Israel campaigns surged. The posts speculate about assassination tactics, rival power, and AIPAC, framing Kirk as a changing force for America’s youth.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

"Charlie Kirk was israel's greatest ally, why would they kill him?" 1. Charlie Kirk actively helped kill anti-BDS legislation. (see below) 2. Charlie Kirk actively opposed social media censorship of "hate speech," especially of anti-israel content on Tiktok. (see below) 3. Israel sees those two strategies, anti-BDS laws and recapturing America's youth via Tiktok, as existentially important to its survival. 4. Charlie Kirk declared war on the ADL, the main organ israel uses to implement social media censorship, and the organization that advocated & aided the israeli takeover of Tiktok. (see below) 5. SUMMARY—Charlie Kirk platformed opposition: to anti-BDS efforts, to social media censorship of Tiktok, and to the ADL—making all of those positions acceptable for America's youth—the very demographic whose ideological recapture israel determined is essential to its very survival. (see below) Yes, Charlie was well-intentioned about his approach and wanted to help protect israel. But he was actually the proverbial fly in the ointment. You know what they say about the "road to hell".... Remember: "israel has a right to defend itself (by any means necessary)." Details & Receipts: Last spring, Charlie Kirk led the effort to kill HR 867, a bill that would have made it criminal for Americans to participate in boycotts of israel sponsored by organizations like the United Nations or the European Union. This bill was defeated after massive opposition to it erupted on Twitter, thanks in large part to Charlie Kirk. This placed him in DIRECT opposition to Benjamin Netanyahu and the israeli government which have previously bragged about getting anti-BDS laws passed in 38 US states. (see below) Netanyahu calls boycotts of israel "contemptible," and has declared that "strong action" would be taken against those who support them. In opposing HR 867, and declaring it the birthright of all Americans to engage in such boycotts, Charlie Kirk all but endorsed the BDS movement. He made it okay for his army of American youth, 50-60% of whom oppose israel, to participate in the BDS movement. (see below) I'll also note that Charlie led the effort to defeat this important bill—promoted by Netanyahu and seen as existentially critical to the survival of israel—2 days AFTER sending his infamous letter in which he spent several pages criticizing israel and Netanyahu. How do you think israel liked watching Charlie Kirk help defeat this existentially important legislation critical to its survival—2 days after having the chutzpah to tell Bibi how to do his job in better accommodating objections to israel from America's youth? It's clear from the attempts to pass that law, the passage of laws forbidding antisemitism on college campuses over the last 2 years, the efforts to deport legal aliens who oppose israel, and the israeli acquisition of Tiktok (in order to censor opposition to israel), that israel is determined to COMPLETELY ELIMINATE opposition from America's youth—not platform it and make it acceptable as Charlie Kirk was actively doing. And now we see that subsequent to Charlie's death, the Tiktok takeover is complete with new censorship already being imposed, and israel has launched a massive new propaganda campaign targeting America's youth with bought-off pro-israel influencers who are trying to turn back the clock to "earlier versions of Charlie Kirk" that didn't raise any objections to israel. It would be difficult to ideologically recapture America's youth and make it taboo to criticize israel again with Charlie Kirk taking the nation's largest youth group in a completely different strategic direction, don't you think?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Netanyahu attacks those who support BDS: https://t.co/D6TQHnRzln

@IsraeliPM - Prime Minister of Israel

It was also not for nothing that the American administration has taken this step together with us. In recent years, we have promoted laws in most US states, which determine that strong action is to be taken against whoever tries to boycott Israel.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Charlie Kirk helps torpedo israel's latest anti-BDS effort: https://t.co/M8ekcorA2I

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Tomorrow the House will vote on HR 867, a bill that will criminalize private boycotts of Israel. Fines up to $1,000,000 and prison time up to 20 years. Bills like this only create more antisemitism, and play into growing narratives that Israel is running the US government. In America you are allowed to hold differing views. You are allowed to disagree and protest. We've allowed far too many people who hate America move here from abroad, but the right to speak freely is the birthright of all Americans. This bill should not pass. Any Republican that votes for this bill will expose themselves. We will be watching very closely.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ israel's existential "Tiktok" problem https://t.co/PW4OdOMWuB https://t.co/h4q3VmNBEU

Video Transcript AI Summary
"But I also wanna point out that we have a major, major, major generational problem." "All the polling I've seen, ADL's polling, ICC's polling, independent polling suggests this is not a left right gap, folks." "The issue in The United States' support for Israel is not left and right." "It is young and old." "The numbers of young people looking to cabazes, you know, massacre was justified as shockingly and terrifyingly high." "We really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Z problem that our community needs to put." "It's the wrong game." "Last week, I'll just say, we saw a dramatic change in the language of the activists here in America on October 8."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I also wanna point out that we have a major, major, major generational problem. All the polling I've seen, ADL's polling, ICC's polling, independent polling suggests this is not a left right gap, folks. The issue in The United States' support for Israel is not left and right. It is young and old. And the numbers of young people looking to cabazes, you know, massacre was justified as shockingly and terrifyingly high. And so we really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Z problem that our community needs to put. The same brains that gave us Tagli, the same brains that gave us all these other amazing innovations need to put our energy toward this like fast. And again, like we've been chasing this left right divide. It's the wrong game. The real game is the next generation and the Hamas and their accomplices, the any the useful idiots in the West are falling in line in ways that are terrified. Last week, I'll just say, we saw a dramatic change in the language of the activists here in America on October 8. The language of groups that we've long tracked, who've long been problematic, like Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voices for Peace. They flicked like this and went to, like, Iranian propaganda. The language I could show you from their toolkits because our analysts are in their groups. We saw this again on October 8. It was that fast. Like, the language in their toolkits was all about the Zionist entity and lots of other language that we recognized from Iranian propaganda.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Watch Charlie make it okay for America's youth to question & even oppose support for israel: https://t.co/REyk39mBAq

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ 🔖CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE UPDATE. Watch this video carefully, then consider the following questions: ▪️How much do you think AIPAC & israel liked this very public discussion about ending aid to israel and debunking the idea that the Bible requires Christians to support israel financially? ▪️How much does this discussion undercut the fundamental principles of Christian zionism? ▪️Who were the "some people" who called Charlie Kirk antisemitic for criticising AIPAC? ▪️How much do you think jews liked the idea of Charlie Kirk de-prioritizing israel and framing AIPAC as putting jews & israeli interests ahead of the America people? ▪️Would jewish supremacists be happy that Charlie was endorsing & promoting the idea of jews converting to Jesus Christ & Catholicism? ▪️Yes, some jews want israel to eventually wean itself off our money (in order to ditch the golden handcuffs....someday, but not yet, of course): but do you really think they want to lose AIPAC or its totally dominant lobby status and control over elections, congress & the US government? ▪️If you think one of the reasons jews killed JFK was because he was trying to force AIPAC (AZC) to register under FARA, how concerned would jews be with this discussion? ▪️If this was what Charlie was doing & saying in public, what do you think he was doing and saying in private? ▪️Finally, what message was Charlie Kirk sending to his 250k+ TPUSA members with this forum discussion? Now consider: AIPAC's power and genius isn't simply their money—it's their capacity & ability to organize and connect media, money, lobbying & campaigns in order to create monopolies over electoral outcomes and israel-first legislation & policies. It's a fully integrated operation for jews, by jews. Further Consider: Charlie Kirk was building his own fully integrated operation with similar organizational capacity to AIPAC— ▪️Funding network becoming bigger, wider and more independent of its initial jewish donors. Do you really think if jews withdrew their support, Charlie wouldn't/couldn't have replaced it eventually? ▪️Independent & growing media presence ▪️Burgeoning campaign field operations ▪️Was capturing & organizing the youth and focusing their energy How do you think israel liked the idea of an organization that would soon have perhaps over 1 million+ members across 10,000+ high school & college chapters with campaign operations in all 50 states—who were Christ-centered America First youth, the majority of whom would want to neutralize AIPAC, would be against giving aid to israel, and would firmly believe in prioritizing the interests of the American people over israel's? How comfortable do you think jews would be with an organization that is a rival to AIPAC, that wants to end AIPAC and is popularizing that idea to millions of youth? How comfortable would they be with such a powerful organization beholden to one man, who's growing ever more independent by the day? A man who is a Christian, pushes Christian identity, pushes proto-White identity, calls for de-escalating neo-con wars, calls for an immigration moratorium, calls out the jewish role in radicalizing & ruining America on the Left, and who might/could/would possibly prioritize American interests over israel's? How comfortable would they be with hanging their zionist hat on such a Christian and his (largely) Christian organization? How comfortable would they be with entrusting the future of israel and zionism to a Christian, proto-White identitarian? Power jealously guards power for power's sake. Cartels hate competition. There's no way jewish supremacy would be happy with putting its eternal security in the hands of an independent Christian White man who wants to maybe end AIPAC and put America First. Charlie might have been mistaken about some things, but by all accounts he was a good man. Maybe he couldn't be compromised or blackmailed. And, with the loss of some major jewish donors, he signaled that he couldn't/wouldn't be straight-up bought anymore, either. -Can't be bought? -Can't be blackmailed? -Can't be reliably controlled 100%? -Is the largest influencer of youth in the country? -Is leading hundreds of thousands of youth in a direction directly opposed to your interests? -Is doing it literally at the time you want to launch your own massive youth influence campaign with a bunch of lesser influencers? WHAT DO YOU DO? ▪️Maybe you JFK him to get him out of the way. ▪️Maybe you RFK him to shut him up. ▪️Maybe you MLK him to make him a martyr for your cause. ▪️Maybe you JFK Jr. him to prevent him from ever winning Higher Office. ▪️Maybe you 9/11 the narrative in order to get America to wage a war against your enemies on the organized anti-israel Left & antisemitic Right. ▪️Maybe you launch an all-out massive propaganda and censorship campaign aimed at America's youth right on the heels of the assassination. ▪️Maybe you have your agents plant or boost a bunch of fake or false conspiracy counter-narratives to muddy the waters. ▪️Maybe you buy, bribe, extort, blackmail, intimidate & threaten anyone who might know something real & relevant into silence. ▪️Maybe you install figureheads sympathetic to israel without the same level of talent or independence as Charlie to lead TPUSA—figureheads who've gotten the message sent via Charlie getting his head blown up. Nah. Couldn't be, right? Who would do that?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discussion questions whether Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, noting 'Genesis twelve three' and that some see it as off putting when confronted with the New Testament, particularly Paul's writings about 'the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant' and Romans nine. The dialogue reveals that the speaker is ethnically Jewish and converting Catholic, and has concerns about APAC. They mention being told that criticizing APAC could be labeled 'anti Semitic,' and 'I think it's ridiculous.' The group asks if APAC represents 'a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people,' to which the response is '100%,' followed by 'We vote. We're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: I think Ted Cruz's Genesis twelve three, I think a lot of people see that as off putting when you look at the New Testament. Why? Because I think a lot of people, they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how that the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's. Everyone's talking about Romans nine? Yes. Yeah. Speaker 0: Are you Catholic? Speaker 1: Converting Catholic from Judaism. This is my next Speaker 0: Oh, from Judaism? Yes. Oh, wow. So so you're Jew you're ethnically Jewish. Speaker 1: Ethnically Jewish. Speaker 0: Yes. And you have concerns about APAC. Yes, Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 0: I'm told that by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize APAC, I'm anti Semitic. Speaker 1: I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country. Speaker 0: Do you think that the that APAC represents Again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people. Yes. Would you guys say that's a fair summary? Speaker 1: 100%. Speaker 0: Meaning that, like, okay. We vote. We're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ When JFK was assassinated, the public saw and understood him as a great ally to jews and a strong supporter of israel and zionism. They killed him anyway. Thread: https://t.co/SG4LbigIfM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ "Charlie Kirk was a zionist and one of israel's strongest supporters, why would they kill him?" Please allow me to explain why this isn't necessarily as robust a falsification of the "israel did it" theory as you might think. 🔖This essay thread. When JFK was assassinated in 1963, no one suspected israel or jewry, nor did they for decades. Why? 3 reasons: 1. At the time, JFK was perceived as being a great ally to jews and a strong supporter of israel & zionism. This cannot be overstated. This would have been the position of regular people and insiders alike. 2. Certain aspects and motives we now ascribe to israel/jewry for being behind the assassination were mostly not known. (Ex: Nukes/Fight with David Ben-Gurion, Palestinian Right of Return, Withdrawal from Vietnam, James Angleton & his army of jewish spies, Yitzhak Rabin was in Dallas that day) 3. Certain aspects and motives that were known but not appreciated by audiences of the time to be as important as we now understand them to have been. (Ex: Jack Ruby, Jolly West, AZC/AIPAC/FARA Registration, Zapruder) Applying the experience, it's possible the actual motives behind assassinating Charlie Kirk might not actually be known, yet, or they might be known and they don't seem as important to us Gentiles right now as they actually are. I submit that a surface-level understanding, or even a moderately critical view, of Charlie's known support for israel isn't nececssarily a sufficient test to rule out israeli/jewish involvement. That level of knowledge, analysis & understanding is why no one suspected jews/israel of being behind the JFK assassination for so long. Let's look at that JFK case, now.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@PaladinUnc808 So true!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@shoegal0128 Which video?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@indigoctarine I actually had that in my original essay above, but I removed it since the connections between TPUSA and the new geofencing initiative aren't yet clear. But yes, they're really suspicious and i have no personal doubt that Charlie told them "no."

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 11, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 4:54 PM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

MORE CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELLS! Google Trends analysis shows George Zinn & Beau Mason were searched from DC IP addresses in July 2025, & Hunter Kozak was searched from israel IPs in early August. Who was interested in these men weeks before the assassination & why? https://t.co/j3MACesrwL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights a cluster of searches centered around July 20. "George Hodgson Zen," the arrestee who stood up within seconds of Charlie Kirk being assassinated and said, "I did it. I shot him," is tied to a District Of Columbia IP search on 07/21/2025. "Bo Mason," the commissioner of the Utah Department of Public Safety, was appointed July 17, so the timing centers around July 20. The Hunter Kozak thread involves a transgender gun-violence question at Charlie Kirk's American comeback tour event in Orum, Utah, at the UVU Courtyard; the team reviewed the question and determined, "yes. You may ask this question live to Charlie Kirk." Israel IP searches for "Hunter Kozak" appear on 03/2025 and 08/03/2025; a District Of Columbia search is noted for 07/21/2025; "Don't know if I've done Utah yet"; "our friends in Israel ... took an interest in this guy."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: George Zinn. You can see here where George Zinn was arrested. There's a little blip on September 10 in the District Of Columbia. I'm I'm assuming this is everybody racing to the, computer to figure out who is the guy they just arrested. I don't know what this is. Maybe a few days later, people go. But look here. July 20. Now this July 20 is gonna become very important tonight. The week of round July 20 is going to become exceedingly important, and the the amount of coincidences that take place between, like, a week before and a week after July 20 and all that time in between becomes very difficult to to set aside, to disregard. So the fact that this this was the first thing I looked up during this go around of searches. George Hodgson Zen, that's the full name of the guy that they first arrested. You remember, this is the old guy who stands up within seconds of Charlie Kirk being assassinated. I did it. I did it. I shot him. I shot him. And then as they're dragging him away, pants fall down, he's like, shoot me. Shoot me. Shoot me. That's George Hodgson Zinn. And he was searched or this name this term was searched according to Google with an IP address originating in the District Of Columbia on 07/21/2025. And, again, I tell you, keep the anchor date around July 20 in head tonight in your mind tonight. Oh, now I go See if I can find him here. Guy named Bo Mason. You guys ever heard of Bo Mason? Bo Mason is the commissioner of the Utah Department of Public Safety. In other words, a high ranking law enforcement official there in Utah, Bo Mason. Now I noticed Bo Mason got appointed to that position on July 17. Again, that anchor right around July 20. He was appointed a few weeks before that, he took the role on July 17 replacing a guy named Jess something, Jess l something who resigned. I can't remember it all off the top of my head. But, again, District Of Columbia, Beau Mason, right, you could say, hey. He's a he's a law enforcement official. Notice how close that is to July 20 again. We got it right in that same window where I told you, really watch that time period. Really watch that time period right around July 20 tonight. Something something caused a lot of these searches to take place right in a very narrow band of time. But, again, this one could be explained away as, hey. He well, he got appointed the very next day. He got appointed on July 17 there in Utah. Maybe on July 16, someone says, we need to look at who the new, Department of Public Safety head is gonna be in Utah. Maybe. Maybe. And how quickly people gave up on the idea that the question that was asked when Charlie Kirk was assassinated could have anything to do with it. It was, like, too perfect of a coincidence. They were talking about transgender gun violence. It was a, a lefty. I think he has a podcast. He's I think he's I don't I don't know. I don't wanna get don't wanna speak out of turn. The guy's name is Hunter Kozak. Hunter Kozak. Hunter Kozak goes to the stage. Now I have heard where he said out of his mouth, he pre screened this question with Charlie Kirk's team. They were fine with him asking this question. It's not like he caught Charlie Kirk unaware with this question. The team reviewed the question, reviewed the questioner, and determined, yes. You may ask this question live to Charlie Kirk at the American comeback tour event in Orum, Utah, Utah Valley University in the UVU Courtyard. And and, initially, people came up and said, oh, that question has to be related. It's just too convenient. You know, had a little transgender terms on the bullets, for example. And this guy, was living with someone who may or may not be transitioning from male to female and and may or may not wear puppy dog costumes and think he's dog or I don't know what the facts are. Not my culture. Not making fun of it. Just telling you I have limitations on my ability to discuss it. But his name was Hunter Kozak, k o z a k. And I thought to myself, self? Actually, someone recommended this one. I would love to take credit for searching this one, but a friend of mine recommended this one. Lo and behold, our friends in Israel were searching the name Hunter Kozak or someone with an IP address originating in Israel were searching the name Hunter Kozak on 03/2025. Again? Look at it again. Just I don't want you to lose it because I'm gonna switch it over to District of Columbia in a second. I might even switch it to Utah. Don't know if I've done Utah yet. But on 08/03/2025, Hunter Kozak searched with an IP address originating in Israel. Now let's do the District Of Columbia. Anyone within our nation's capital curious about this guy? No. Anybody inside the state of Utah curious about this guy? Only after the shooting only after the shooting, but our friends on the other side of the world, for some reason, took an interest in this guy.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 11, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note a breaking claim that Israeli IPs conducted unique Google searches on Deirdre Amaro, Charlie Kirk, and Josh Hammer in spring 2024. Amaro was hired Utah Medical Examiner on May 14, 2024; Hammer says he began working with Kirk around April 2024. Questions rise about Israeli interest, who connected Amaro/Hofmann, whether Hammer was Kirk’s handler, and a contingency plan if Hammer faltered. Post 3 extends to June/July 2025 searches; others respond with scratches, screen recordings, and debunking.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK PLOT UNRAVELING FAST? Israeli IP addresses conducted unique Google searches of Deirdre Amaro, Charlie Kirk, Josh Hammer, and Tyler Robinson in close proximity in the spring of 2024!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL UPDATE: ISRAELI IP ADDRESSES Conducted Unique Google Searches on "Deirdre Amaro," "Charlie Kirk," and "Josh Hammer" in close proximity in the spring of 2024. Amaro: March 21, 2024 Kirk: May 10, 2024 Hammer: May 17, 2024 ▪️Dr. Deirdre Weiss Amaro (possibly ✡️) was subsequently hired as the Utah State Medical Examiner on May 14, 2024, by Dr. Michelle Hofmann (✡️) ▪️Josh Hammer (✡️) recently revealed he started closely collaborating with Charlie Kirk about "a year and a half ago," which would be around April of 2024. Questions: ▪️Why was anyone in israel interested in Dr. Deirdre Amaro in March of 2024? ▪️Who put Utah/Dr. Michelle Hofmann onto Dr. Deirdre Amaro and when? ▪️Was Josh Hammer assigned as Charlie Kirk's handler in the spring of 2024? Is that why they trended together in israel on those dates? Is that why Hammer started closely associating with Kirk then? ▪️Was a parallel "contingency plan" also underway should Hammer fail to wrangle Charlie Kirk back firmly onto the "israel First" plantation? WHAT TF IS GOING ON?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

screenrecording if it gets scrubbed https://t.co/4JQ1TEpsti

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LaurenWitzkeDE Here, Lauren: https://t.co/vxvX82Vsay

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL: isreali & Washington DC IP addresses caught conducting UNIQUE Google searches for Timpanogas Regional Hospital, Utah Medical Examiner Deirdre Amaro & various TRH surgeons during June/July 2025! H/t: Baron Coleman, YouTube https://t.co/IiOLpxFgyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk was taken to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. “Psycho District Of Columbia.” “Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur.” “This spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting.” “the July 20 anchor date.” “the day before, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is.” “I thought, I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah.” “Deidra Amaro.” “06/30/2025. In Israel.” “an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro.” The speaker then cites researching “the surgeons at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital,” listing “Steven Neelman,” “Robert Patterson, MD,” “Lee Trotter,” “Lee Patterson,” “Brian Gill,” and “Richard Rasmussen.” “If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. Wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. They took him to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. That's there in the district. I mean, that's there in, Utah. They have, I think, a campus in Orem, Utah. Psycho District Of Columbia. Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur. But you'll see this spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting. But, again, keep in mind that July 20 anchor date, here we have a 07/16/2025. And then we have a July 3, and we have a June 28. And if you go out twelve months, you'll notice you even had one back then, and then this all kinda goes out. So something's going on here at the Tempanogos Ridge Hospital search. And then right the day before the shooting, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot. So you had that July 20 anchor date, time around there. You had a time way back. That could be anything. And then the day before, somebody zeros in and says, we need to we need to look up Tempanogos Regional Hospital. Maybe looking up address. Maybe looking up who knows? Who knows? But, again, I'm just reporting the facts. I'm just reporting the facts. I'm not drawing conclusions tonight. I could give you possible conclusions. You could draw, and you could draw your own conclusion, or you could just sit back and look and learn like I did. Because after Temponogos Regional Hospital, I thought, I wonder who the I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah. I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah because they it it appears it appears to me based on everything I've looked at that Charlie Kirk may not have had an autopsy, which I find shocking. Shocking. Because an autopsy could give you a lot of things such as what angle did the bullet come in, where did the bullet go, what type of bullet was it, what damages were done to the organs, were there any other injuries? And this is gonna come up in a minute. Were there any other injuries anywhere else in the body? And so I wondered who the medical examiner was there in Utah, and I looked her up. She's a woman named Deidra Amaro. And she was looked up, but this time not in the District Of Columbia, but in Israel, which I thought was very strange. 06/30/2025. In Israel. 06/30/2025, an IP address originating in Israel. Again, we talked last week about the ways IP address is coming up sooner. But Deidre Amaro, the medical examiner there in Utah, somebody with an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro. Unless you think I didn't check. The reason I'm not showing you others, go to the District Of Columbia, for example, not there. You can even go to Utah and see. Not there. So if it's not in the District Of Columbia and it's not in Utah, this is not a very common search is what I'm pointing out here. Not a very common search at all. But there it was in Israel. So I thought that's weird. That's weird. So I press on. Alright. This one gets a little deep. This one, if you have a five point safety harness in your seat, you might wanna go ahead and fasten it. You will have full access to your entire seat. You will only need the front edge for this one. This one took a little research. I was very curious when the TalkingPointsUSA spokesperson came out and said they'd spoken to the surgeon but didn't get the surgeon's name. So I thought, who's the surgeon? Again, this is the surgeon who looked according to the TalkingPointsUSA, spokesperson who seems like a nice guy, not knocking him all. Only relaying do his job, relaying the message that he was given from the surgeon, just letting the world know about it. Fine with it. This is the guy who said, Hey, Charlie's made a steal. This bullet would have normally gone through almost anybody, but Charlie, not Charlie's made a steal. They didn't get the surgeon's name, and again, remember, Deidre Amora, they didn't do an autopsy, don't think. At least that's the news on the street, didn't do an autopsy. So I go and I get a list of all the surgeons I can find at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital. And I think, could anyone have looked up any of these people? The first aid surgeon I could find was a guy named Steven Neelman. Steven Neelman. Remember that date? July 20. This is July 18. This is July 18. Steven Neilman. 07/18/2025. This was out of our friends on the other side of the planet over there. Very curious about the surgeons in Utah, you'll find out. I go to the next one I could find, Robert Patterson. I found a lot, so I added an MD to it. Robert Patterson, MD. July 2324. May have been the only one that was searched twice, two days in a row. July 2324, Robert Patterson, MD. Again, I just find online a list of surgeons at Tempanogos. I eliminate people like the breast reconstruction surgeons because I didn't think that was necessary to look up. Actually, might have looked up one of them. But I found the general surgeons, the emergency surgeons, all the people who who, minor surgery. I look them all up. I go to the next one, Lee Trotter. Has anyone looked up Lee Trotter? Again, notice the date. Notice the date. This is right in that July 20 area, that July 20 timeline. Someone with an IP address originating in Israel, looking up surgeon Lee Trotter near about that same July 20 time period. Are there other surgeons in the area? Yes. As a matter fact, is. There's a guy named Lee Patterson. So I look up Lee Patterson. Notice the date, July 19. Somebody with an IP address originating in Israel in the week of July 20, that week on either side of July 20, was very interested in all the people who practice surgery at Tippinogo's Regional Hospital in Orem, Utah. There was a lot of interest from an IP address originating there. Now let's just you know, we talked about the different. Say someone using a a VPN. At this point, if I'm the FBI or I'm the Utah State Police I think this is still Utah State Police matter, by the way. This didn't cross jurisdiction lines, I don't think. If I'm the Utah State Police, I'm calling Google and saying, I didn't know the IP addresses they did this. I didn't even know if this is belong to. VPN has belongs to this. Is it the same IP address? They looked up all the different surgeons in my county. Because there's more. By the way, there's a guy named Brian Gill, probably a very talented surgeon. July 22, IP address originating in Israel. What about Richard Rasmussen? I'm sure he's a fine surgeon. A nice guy. Probably a pillar of the community. Also searched July 14. IP address originating in Israel. Richard Rasmussen. Again, if I'm the state police, if I'm the FBI, I have real concerns that my surgeons are being searched within a very narrow time window, like seven to ten days of each other. And I wanna know is it the same IP address looking at all of them? Because I wanna know who the hell is so curious about my surgeons in my local hospital. If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog. And people may have been searching the surgeon,

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@power_white Try your desktop

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ag_trader and yet

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@truthtroll_X Mind blowing

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GenXGirl1994 Very

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@NickerNat I screenrecorded it. Check above

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@MariaSanchezium lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Yeah87765450 Candace debunked this

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 11, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 2:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL UPDATE reports Israeli IP addresses conducted unique Google searches for Deirdre Amaro, Charlie Kirk, Josh Hammer, and Tyler Robinson in spring 2024, with Amaro hired as Utah Medical Examiner on May 14, 2024 by Dr. Michelle Hofmann. It questions why Israel tracked Amaro, who influenced her Utah appointment, whether Hammer was Kirk’s handler, and if a contingency existed if Hammer failed to steer Kirk toward an “Israel First” line; later posts note 2025 searches.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL UPDATE: ISRAELI IP ADDRESSES Conducted Unique Google Searches on "Deirdre Amaro," "Charlie Kirk," and "Josh Hammer" in close proximity in the spring of 2024. Amaro: March 21, 2024 Kirk: May 10, 2024 Hammer: May 17, 2024 ▪️Dr. Deirdre Weiss Amaro (possibly ✡️) was subsequently hired as the Utah State Medical Examiner on May 14, 2024, by Dr. Michelle Hofmann (✡️) ▪️Josh Hammer (✡️) recently revealed he started closely collaborating with Charlie Kirk about "a year and a half ago," which would be around April of 2024. Questions: ▪️Why was anyone in israel interested in Dr. Deirdre Amaro in March of 2024? ▪️Who put Utah/Dr. Michelle Hofmann onto Dr. Deirdre Amaro and when? ▪️Was Josh Hammer assigned as Charlie Kirk's handler in the spring of 2024? Is that why they trended together in israel on those dates? Is that why Hammer started closely associating with Kirk then? ▪️Was a parallel "contingency plan" also underway should Hammer fail to wrangle Charlie Kirk back firmly onto the "israel First" plantation? WHAT TF IS GOING ON?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ MORE SUSPICIOUS SEARCHES: https://t.co/vxvX82Vsay

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL: isreali & Washington DC IP addresses caught conducting UNIQUE Google searches for Timpanogas Regional Hospital, Utah Medical Examiner Deirdre Amaro & various TRH surgeons during June/July 2025! H/t: Baron Coleman, YouTube https://t.co/IiOLpxFgyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker tracks online searches about Charlie Kirk’s hospitalization at Tempanogos Regional Hospital, noting a spike around July 20 and a District Of Columbia query the day before: "we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot." They question whether an autopsy was performed, asking, "I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah" and citing "Deidra Amaro" as the Utah medical examiner. An IP address from Israel looked up "Deidre Amaro" on 06/30/2025. The search expands to surgeons at the Orem branch: "Steven Neelman," "Robert Patterson, MD," "Lee Trotter," "Lee Patterson," "Brian Gill," "Richard Rasmussen"—all with Israel-origin IPs around July 19-22. They speculate about VPNs and ask if this relates to "an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog." "I'm not drawing conclusions tonight."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. Wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. They took him to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. That's there in the district. I mean, that's there in, Utah. They have, I think, a campus in Orem, Utah. Psycho District Of Columbia. Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur. But you'll see this spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting. But, again, keep in mind that July 20 anchor date, here we have a 07/16/2025. And then we have a July 3, and we have a June 28. And if you go out twelve months, you'll notice you even had one back then, and then this all kinda goes out. So something's going on here at the Tempanogos Ridge Hospital search. And then right the day before the shooting, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot. So you had that July 20 anchor date, time around there. You had a time way back. That could be anything. And then the day before, somebody zeros in and says, we need to we need to look up Tempanogos Regional Hospital. Maybe looking up address. Maybe looking up who knows? Who knows? But, again, I'm just reporting the facts. I'm just reporting the facts. I'm not drawing conclusions tonight. I could give you possible conclusions. You could draw, and you could draw your own conclusion, or you could just sit back and look and learn like I did. Because after Temponogos Regional Hospital, I thought, I wonder who the I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah. I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah because they it it appears it appears to me based on everything I've looked at that Charlie Kirk may not have had an autopsy, which I find shocking. Shocking. Because an autopsy could give you a lot of things such as what angle did the bullet come in, where did the bullet go, what type of bullet was it, what damages were done to the organs, were there any other injuries? And this is gonna come up in a minute. Were there any other injuries anywhere else in the body? And so I wondered who the medical examiner was there in Utah, and I looked her up. She's a woman named Deidra Amaro. And she was looked up, but this time not in the District Of Columbia, but in Israel, which I thought was very strange. 06/30/2025. In Israel. 06/30/2025, an IP address originating in Israel. Again, we talked last week about the ways IP address is coming up sooner. But Deidre Amaro, the medical examiner there in Utah, somebody with an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro. Unless you think I didn't check. The reason I'm not showing you others, go to the District Of Columbia, for example, not there. You can even go to Utah and see. Not there. So if it's not in the District Of Columbia and it's not in Utah, this is not a very common search is what I'm pointing out here. Not a very common search at all. But there it was in Israel. So I thought that's weird. That's weird. So I press on. Alright. This one gets a little deep. This one, if you have a five point safety harness in your seat, you might wanna go ahead and fasten it. You will have full access to your entire seat. You will only need the front edge for this one. This one took a little research. I was very curious when the TalkingPointsUSA spokesperson came out and said they'd spoken to the surgeon but didn't get the surgeon's name. So I thought, who's the surgeon? Again, this is the surgeon who looked according to the TalkingPointsUSA, spokesperson who seems like a nice guy, not knocking him all. Only relaying do his job, relaying the message that he was given from the surgeon, just letting the world know about it. Fine with it. This is the guy who said, Hey, Charlie's made a steal. This bullet would have normally gone through almost anybody, but Charlie, not Charlie's made a steal. They didn't get the surgeon's name, and again, remember, Deidre Amora, they didn't do an autopsy, don't think. At least that's the news on the street, didn't do an autopsy. So I go and I get a list of all the surgeons I can find at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital. And I think, could anyone have looked up any of these people? The first aid surgeon I could find was a guy named Steven Neelman. Steven Neelman. Remember that date? July 20. This is July 18. This is July 18. Steven Neilman. 07/18/2025. This was out of our friends on the other side of the planet over there. Very curious about the surgeons in Utah, you'll find out. I go to the next one I could find, Robert Patterson. I found a lot, so I added an MD to it. Robert Patterson, MD. July 2324. May have been the only one that was searched twice, two days in a row. July 2324, Robert Patterson, MD. Again, I just find online a list of surgeons at Tempanogos. I eliminate people like the breast reconstruction surgeons because I didn't think that was necessary to look up. Actually, might have looked up one of them. But I found the general surgeons, the emergency surgeons, all the people who who, minor surgery. I look them all up. I go to the next one, Lee Trotter. Has anyone looked up Lee Trotter? Again, notice the date. Notice the date. This is right in that July 20 area, that July 20 timeline. Someone with an IP address originating in Israel, looking up surgeon Lee Trotter near about that same July 20 time period. Are there other surgeons in the area? Yes. As a matter fact, is. There's a guy named Lee Patterson. So I look up Lee Patterson. Notice the date, July 19. Somebody with an IP address originating in Israel in the week of July 20, that week on either side of July 20, was very interested in all the people who practice surgery at Tippinogo's Regional Hospital in Orem, Utah. There was a lot of interest from an IP address originating there. Now let's just you know, we talked about the different. Say someone using a a VPN. At this point, if I'm the FBI or I'm the Utah State Police I think this is still Utah State Police matter, by the way. This didn't cross jurisdiction lines, I don't think. If I'm the Utah State Police, I'm calling Google and saying, I didn't know the IP addresses they did this. I didn't even know if this is belong to. VPN has belongs to this. Is it the same IP address? They looked up all the different surgeons in my county. Because there's more. By the way, there's a guy named Brian Gill, probably a very talented surgeon. July 22, IP address originating in Israel. What about Richard Rasmussen? I'm sure he's a fine surgeon. A nice guy. Probably a pillar of the community. Also searched July 14. IP address originating in Israel. Richard Rasmussen. Again, if I'm the state police, if I'm the FBI, I have real concerns that my surgeons are being searched within a very narrow time window, like seven to ten days of each other. And I wanna know is it the same IP address looking at all of them? Because I wanna know who the hell is so curious about my surgeons in my local hospital. If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog. And people may have been searching the surgeon,

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ TYLER ROBINSON TOO! https://t.co/3ypcP50Lwt

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK PLOT UNRAVELING FAST? Israeli IP addresses conducted unique Google searches of Deirdre Amaro, Charlie Kirk, Josh Hammer, and Tyler Robinson in close proximity in the spring of 2024!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL UPDATE: ISRAELI IP ADDRESSES Conducted Unique Google Searches on "Deirdre Amaro," "Charlie Kirk," and "Josh Hammer" in close proximity in the spring of 2024. Amaro: March 21, 2024 Kirk: May 10, 2024 Hammer: May 17, 2024 ▪️Dr. Deirdre Weiss Amaro (possibly

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ More on the Medical Examiner Dr. Deirdre Amaro https://t.co/7tLnzTsEYN

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

What if I told you Utah's new Medical Examiner might be jewish & likely has jewish kids? What if I told you she was also hired by a jew? What if I told you she was hired around the same time Josh Hammer began keeping tabs on Charlie Kirk? What does it all mean? Receipts: https://t.co/V8d57liWvs

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies “Dr. Deidra Weiss Amaro” as “the medical examiner” and notes she “was hired on 05/14/2024” from the University of Missouri Columbia by “Dr. Michelle Hoffman,” the deputy director of Utah Department of Health and Human Services. The timing is linked to Amaro's divorce described as happening “mid May twenty twenty four.” “Her ex husband was the petitioner and he hired a Jewish lawyer.” The speaker asks, “Is Jason Weiss himself Jewish? … This is a known pattern of Jews changing their names to anglicized forms.” The story shifts to “Josh Hammer” who “became closely associated with Charlie Kirk” around “April 2024,” with speculation whether he was “Charlie Kirk's handler.” It adds that “the Jewish doctor, Michelle Hoffman in Utah, reached out to Doctor. Deidra Amaro” after her divorce. It ends with questions about “Israel's hidden Jewish helpers, the Syeneim” and whether “Hoffman” or “Amaro” are Jewish, inviting tips at moretipscandisowens dot com.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who would be the person that can make that fit? Look, I did receive a tip and guess what? There was another person in this never ending brand new cast of characters that was also involved in this story. And this person in an email insisted to me that this is somebody that we should look further into. That's the medical examiner. It is a woman named Doctor. Deidra Weiss Amaro. Deidra Weiss Amaro is her name and she blew in from California. She was announced as the new state medical examiner in May 2024. I'm sorry, from Missouri. I think she also worked at some point in California and she was announced as the new Utah medical examiner, state Utah medical examiner in May 2024. So I'm interested in learning as much as I can about this medical examiner. I'd like to know more about this medical examiner. And if you've got something, you know this personally, you got a story, please do send it to us at moretipscandisowens dot com. Speaker 1: Okay, please note the following about Doctor. Deirdre Amaro. She was hired on 05/14/2024. That will be an important date in just a moment. She was hired from the University of Missouri Columbia. She was hired by Doctor. Michelle Hoffman. All of this is going to become important. Here you can see the background of Doctor. Michelle Hoffman, the deputy director of Utah Department of Health and Human Services who hired Doctor. Amaro. You can see her ethnic background there. Next, see that Doctor. Deidra Amaro got divorced at roughly the same time that she got hired to be Utah's new medical examiner. Very interesting timing, wouldn't you say? Please note that her ex husband was the petitioner and he hired a Jewish lawyer. Is Jason Weiss himself Jewish? Well, his surname Weiss is suggestive that he's Jewish as are his several literally anglicized aliases. This is a known pattern of Jews changing their names to anglicized forms. But is there anything more to the timing of her hire? Listen closely to this recent testimonial from Josh Hammer. Speaker 2: And it was really only over the past, I don't know, a year and a half or so that I would say that we became closer. I started going on his show, The Charlie Kirk Show, wildly popular podcast radio show. I started going on the show more often, and we started talking very frequently. Speaker 1: So there you have it. About a year and a half ago, around April 2024, Josh Hammer became closely associated with Charlie Kirk. Was he Charlie Kirk's handler? Many have speculated that he was given the closeness of their relationship and his mysterious involvement in all of these events after the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And then a few weeks after he started becoming closely associated with Charlie Kirk, the Jewish doctor, Michelle Hoffman in Utah, reached out to Doctor. Dieter Amaro, who was getting divorced from her Jewish husband in mid May twenty twenty four and hired her to be Utah's new medical examiner. Now look into Israel's hidden Jewish helpers, the Syeneim. Is Doctor. Michelle Hoffman perhaps a Syeneim? What about Doctor. Amaro? Is she Jewish? Her husband seems to be. And if he is, then certainly her children are as well. So, is she Jewish? Is she a Syeneem as well? Is she a helper? I don't know for sure, but these are the questions that we need to be asking and getting answers to.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Tyler Robinson was searched again by israel in early August! https://t.co/mObFiiY8Y6

@JustaLillyBit - Lilly

@RyanMattaMedia https://t.co/7ZpwP1lDIR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@IanMalcolm84 Thanks, bro!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@thegrimrepairer I put her onto that. 🔥

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@thistle_king86 It was announced to the public on August 27th, 2025

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@curious10665 which post?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 8, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m candid: I started convinced there was malfeasance by Stew Peters and JPROOF, and I still find the case troubling. The space showed mixed receipts; Stew’s explanations were plausible but I distrust him, especially after clear lies about Lucas. I believe UAI is real, uncensored AI, with genuine investors and a real product. I’ve supported SEC action, would dissociate if charges prove real, and I’ll stay involved to push for a Stew-free UAI. If you dislike it, don’t invest.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

LONG POST ON JPROOF AND UNCENSORED AI (UAI) You've seen the battle raging online over JPROOF and UAI. Here are my lengthy thoughts. First: Yesterday's Twitter Debate Over JPROOF & The Allegations That Stew Peters Committed Fraud ▪️My position previous to the space: Earlier this summer, I spent time looking at the evidence against Stew & JPROOF and was initially convinced that there had been malfeasance. Since then, I have been supporting the campaign to expose JPROOF & Stew Peters. I saw sufficient grounds to dissociate myself from him and his operation. I wanted nothing to do with it. By the end of this evaluation, you'll see that my position hasn't changed. ▪️The Space Itself: I thought team Lucas Gage came prepared with many receipts to back up their several allegations, with varying degrees of convincing power on the audience. Stew seemed to have an explanation for virtually all of the accusations, but it must be noted that he himself didn't present receipts as they did. We were simply asked to trust his explanations. I found his answers to have varying degrees of believability. He didn't necessarily win me over in total, but I thought some, maybe many, of his answers were plausible. Several people in both camps spoke, with "expert" allies of each side taking predictable stances for or against. ▪️Results: I believe team Lucas succeeded in demonstrating that Stew & his team made mistakes and that the whole management of JPROOF was riddled with incompetence & confusion. However, I'm not sure that they succeeded in proving to the audience that Stew acted with overt malice or premeditated determination to commit fraud & scam people. Having said that, I'm not positive he didn't, and they did succeed in making me pretty suspicious, just as they had earlier in the summer. I'll put it this way: Would I bet money that Stew is innocent? No, I would not. Would I bet money that he's for sure guilty of all counts as charged? Also, no, I would not. Simply put, I'm just not certain one way or another. I realize I just don't know enough or am expert enough in crypto. But I'm very suspicious. ▪️Conclusions: What I am sure of is that Stew has needlessly told lies about Lucas and his family. Lies that I know for sure to be false and am certain Stew also knows to be false. I understand he was fighting back against Lucas's JPROOF accusations, but rather than keep the focus on the allegations, Stew smeared Lucas & his family. Therefore, I don't trust him and can't take his answers in the space at face value. That tips the scales for me. As Lucas said, "Stew came up, he said what he did. If you believe Stew now, that's on you." I echo that. Everyone has laid their cards on the table as much as they're going to be laid on the table. We've now had the best hearing we're going to get. What each person decides to do from here onward regarding JPROOF is on everyone individually. ▪️Final Note: After hearing from 3rd-party spectators and supporters of both camps, I can sympathize with the wide range of final opinions on this. As I'm not sure any definitive "kill shots" were landed by either side, I won't begrudge or attack anyone for taking the side they end up taking. However, as I said for my part, I don't trust Stew and won't be taking his side. Your use of JPROOF or association with it or Stew Peters is now on you.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ What is Uncensored AI? Uncensored AI (UAI) is a real company, with real investors, who have put their own real money into this project. It's not fake. It's not vaporware. It's not a ponzi scheme, or an entrapment or phishing scam, as some have alleged. And no, it hasn’t received any money from Peter Thiel or any other venture capital firms, either. Finally, it was not conceived or built in order to support some alleged JPROOF pump-and-dump scam. The UAI model is built on a real LLM. It's an "off-the-shelf", white-label foundational model that is being continuously trained with UAI’s own proprietary process and dataset in order to be UNCENSORED. The affiliate badge program UAI operated through Twitter Gold Check verification was a routine marketing and sales strategy. In fact, UAI was spending over $5,000/month to affiliate over 80 accounts covering politics, pop culture, entertainment, sports, business, finance, etc. It was trying to cover the entire spectrum of general human interest. Why? Because it's UNCENSORED. There was no abuse of this program nor any violation of TOS. Anyone with a legitimate organization can get a gold check and affiliate other accounts without any limits that I’m aware of. There's nothing suspicious or abusive about this. All accusations to the contrary are simply ignorant of these facts and result from false assumptions. UAI is a darn good product. It’s easy to use, looks good and delivers fast results. And it’s uncensored! It’s a simple concept that occupies a nice niche somewhere between the uselessness of highly-censored MS Copilot drivel and the increasingly-censored Grok/ChatGPT encyclopedics. I’m pleased with its current progress and am looking forward to what it will ultimately become as we strive to continuously improve it.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ My Initial Involvement with UAI JD Sharp, one of the founders of UAI, saw my early enthusiasm for AI--and knowing of my passion for fighting the information wars, reached out to me in December 2023. As an early proponent of building AI tools without censorship, I was both excited and intrigued at this early vision & effort to deliver something uncensored to the masses. He broached the idea of me helping the project and maybe providing me some equity at some point as compensation for future services rendered. Thereafter, and throughout 2024, I consulted on the project. Once the beta version went live around January 2025, I was an early tester and began promoting the service for several months—helping train the model & build public interest while UAI continued working out enough bugs to take it live. I was never paid anything for this, only told that "maybe we'll be able to get you some shares at some point. That’s my plan." That's it. Nothing was guaranteed at first. The payment for my involvement was only ever premised on the possibility of getting shares, not even getting the shares themselves. We never even discussed how many shares or what they’d be worth. Everything was built on our mutual word and trust. True to his word, JD eventually compensated me with some shares in March 2025 for my support and services rendered. I was then compensated with a few more shares in exchange for my continued promotion & support of the product going forward once we went live. In all, I hold a 0.35% ownership stake in the company. About 1/3 of 1 percent. I was given a UAI affiliate badge here on Twitter and continued promoting the brand. At this point, these shares are not liquid or convertible to any cash payout. IOW, the compensation for my services is still premised on future returns and profits for the company that have yet to be realized. But as the company and JD have so far delivered on their promises to me and UAI is growing with more satisfied customers every day, I believe it will all be worth it. I’m not being used or exploited. I fully expect that as we raise money and increase our valuation, these shares will materialize and I’ll be paid as we pass scheduled liquidity events. JD has been straightforward, open, and honest with me and delivered on every promise so far. No deception. No fraud. No subterfuge. To this point, I have not received any monetary payment as such. I don't get any money or extra shares for making posts. I don't receive any extra compensation for people who subscribe as a result of my efforts. Everything is premised on the promise of some future return, as of yet unrealized—but expected—for the shares originally granted me. There is nothing unethical or dishonest about this. It’s just plain good old-fashioned business.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ The Controversy So what’s with all the controversy? The controversy stems from Stew Peters being one of the 81 people who received a UAI affiliate badge. Peters is a long-time friend of JD Sharp, one of the main owners and founders of UAI. But as noted, there are still open & unresolved questions for many, leaving a dark cloud hanging over Stew Peters and JPROOF. Some people are absolutely convinced Stew defrauded them out of thousands of dollars. Others are not sure, but suspicious. Others haven’t looked into it closely enough, or simply don’t understand crypto enough, to have an informed opinion. Up to this point, I’ve completely supported the hard position towards Stew Peters as I stated above. I supported the lawsuit and SEC complaint against JPROOF. I still do. I’ve reached out to JD on numerous occasions to let him know I don’t approve of Stew’s involvement and that I think UAI would be better off without associating with Stew or JPROOF. JD disagrees as even after yesterday’s space, he is still not convinced that Stew committed fraud. It also doesn’t help that many have been relentlessly attacking JD and UAI, neither of which has committed any fraud. JD is a long-time friend of Stew, has never had a bad experience with Stew himself, and likes the idea of UAI being associated with the first ever crypto to be censored like JPROOF has been. Brand synergy. I ultimately disagree with this strategy, but I understand his reticence to outright sever ties with his friend Stew over circumstances he doesn’t deem to be proven.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ My Continued Involvement With UAI JD Sharp has not treated me in a fraudulent manner. He has not treated anyone I know of in a fraudulent manner. The business itself has not treated anyone in a fraudulent manner. UAI has not defrauded any of you or any of its users. It is providing a real service to real customers who are either satisfied or not. It has real shareholders it is beholden to. I think UAI is making a mistake in associating with Stew Peters and JPROOF. I’ve told them that explicitly. They’re quite aware of my feelings on this matter. And because of the respect they have for me, and even for their most strident detractors, they are 100% okay with me publishing my opinions on the matter. They aren’t censoring me or asking me to hold back. In fact, I’m opening the hood in a way that is traditionally frowned upon. As Queen Elizabeth II often held: “never complain, never explain.” I’ve violated this in spades. It shouldn’t need to be said, but obviously I don’t agree with everything JD Sharp or other people with the UAI affiliate badge tweet. And they don’t agree with everything I tweet. There will always be various fights and disagreements between such a large and disparate group of people. But that’s the point, it’s UNCENSORED. I still stay involved because I think it’s worth having an uncensored AI service that’s ultimately on OUR side. And I think that I have a good opportunity to help make a difference with it, regardless of Stew Peters. UAI spans a much greater footprint than Twitter. Some of the largest UAI investors aren’t even on this platform. It’s important to keep that in perspective. Will any of this JPROOF fight matter in 1, 2 or 3 years? I doubt it, and I’m looking at the long-term here. UAI is so much bigger than Stew Peters or JPROOF. I could walk away, but what would that accomplish? It would go on without me, and then you wouldn’t have someone like me on the inside. Walking away now only hurts me—which by extension hurts us and the movement. Those who demand I walk away from my own interest and influence in UAI have no skin in this game and are merely demanding that I cut off my nose to spite my face to assuage their own desires and egos. If you’re wary of Stew Peters and JPROOF, DON’T INVEST IN JPROOF. I myself am not invested in JPROOF. I’ve been very consistent about this. As I stated above, I wouldn’t bet on Stew’s innocence or guilt either way—but I have pretty strong suspicions and he’s certainly a liar. If you don’t like that UAI affiliated with Stew Peters, then don’t use UAI. If you don’t like that I still work with UAI even though it’s associated with Stew, feel free to unfollow me and cease interacting with my content. OBVIOUSLY. That’s your prerogative. We all fight the fight the way we best see fit. As for me, I will continue to work to minimize and/or eliminate any influence Stew might have with UAI. But rest assured, UAI has not itself perpetrated any fraud, nor does Stew have any managerial control or oversight at UAI. He doesn’t guide the project or control it in any way. And for as long as I’m involved, I’m determined to keep it that way, which is just another reason for me to stay. Finally, I have secured assurances that if charges end up being filed against Stew, or if he’s convicted, then UAI will obviously at that point dissociate itself. It’s not the hard position I’d like them to take right now, but it is reasonable from UAI’s perspective, given that nothing has been iron-clad proven against Stew at this point. So if you want to get back at Stew, end his affiliation with UAI, and take down JPROOF, the best way to do it is to prevail with the lawsuit and SEC complaint—both of which I support. I’ve now shown you all my cards. I’ve been completely transparent. Probably overly so. Again, I’m proud of what we’ve been able to deliver with UAI here at the outset. I’m excited about the initial splash we’ve made. The results are getting better all the time. I’m grateful to JD and the team at UAI for giving me the opportunity to be a part of this and help build something that has the potential to deliver a real impact. It’s a great product that the average person can trust to open the door to greater understanding without the manipulation and censorship inherent in the other major models. Go look into it and give it a try. Or not.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ "Look into it." http://uncensored.ai

Uncensored AI The AI that holds nothing back. Look Into It. uncensored.ai

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

I've done the best I can with the knowledge and support that you've given me. But I know my limitations. I would not place my hand on a Bible and swear either way. That is not an attack on you, it is an admission of my own shortcomings. However, that is why I: 1. Have strong suspicions there was malfeasance 2. Want nothing to do with Stew 3. Support the SEC complaint and lawsuit 4. Encourage others to not be involved in JPROOF 5. Haven't badmouthed or denounced you, but been supportive of you. You came prepared and performed well.

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
From the provided facts, I know Erika Kirk knew about the numerous death threats Charlie had been receiving, and Charlie thought threats warranted extra security while Erika pushed for a bulletproof vest. The threats’ source is not identified; “They” remains unspecified. A recent, significant development is Erika proposing a vest, but timing/details aren’t given. Israel-centric threats’ start date and Josh Hammer’s alleged lies aren’t documented here. Readers clearly want full disclosure.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

WHAT DOES ERIKA KIRK KNOW? Fact: Charlie himself had recently indicated israel might try to kill him. Fact: Erika Kirk admits she knew about the "numerous" death threats Charlie had been receiving. Fact: Charlie thought these threats merited extra security & Erika thought they merited a bulletproof vest. Fact: Erika expressed her desires for him to wear the vest the same night Charlie allegedly texted people "They're trying to kill me." QUESTIONS ▪️What does Erika Kirk know? ▪️Who did these threats come from? Who is "They?" ▪️What had them both so spooked? Was it really just random or general threats from kooky "Leftists?" Since Erika had just proposed a vest for the first time, this suggests a recent & significant development. ▪️Why did Charlie single out israel specifically? ▪️When did the first israel-centric threats begin? Over what? ▪️Why did Josh Hammer spend the last month lying about Charlie's shifting position on israel? What else is he lying about? What lies did he tell Charlie? Who else besides me wants an immediate and full disclosure of these "numerous death threats?"

Video Transcript AI Summary
And then we're supposed to believe that he had that dramatic switch. So he went from, I'm done to, like, hey. Love you. How can I be of more service to you? And then in that exact same day, he was texting people saying they are gonna kill me. That same night before Charlie Kirk was murdered and had been telling people he thought Israel might try to kill him, his wife, Erica, begged him to wear a bulletproof vest due to death threats he'd been receiving the previous year. Given that Charlie himself thought these threats were credible enough to merit extra security and his wife thought they were credible enough to wear a bulletproof vest. And given that he'd previously singled out Israel as perhaps wanting to kill him, we, the public, should demand an immediate and full disclosure of all of these threats and a complete investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then we're supposed to believe that he had that dramatic switch. So he went from, I'm done to, like, hey. Love you. How can I be of more service to you? And then in that exact same day, he was texting people saying they are gonna kill me. On the same day that he's on this Zoom call, as a fact, this night Zoom call, as Josh says it was that night or the New York Post reported, I think, that it was at night. That at the same time, that same day, he's texting people saying they are going to kill me. Speaker 1: That same night before Charlie Kirk was murdered and had been telling people he thought Israel might try to kill him, his wife, Erica, begged him to wear a bulletproof vest due to the death threats he'd been receiving the previous year. Given that Charlie himself thought these threats were credible enough to merit extra security and his wife thought they were credible enough to wear a bulletproof vest. And given that he'd previously singled out Israel as perhaps wanting to kill him, we, the public, should demand an immediate and full disclosure of all of these threats and a complete investigation.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 2, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m asking why Charlie Kirk will tell the truth while Matt Walsh won’t. What’s going on with Matt Walsh? Matt is criticized for blasting the Pope and defending Stephen Miller as not anti-White, while he works for Ben Shapiro who mocks Jesus and is loyal to a foreign country. In my words, Matt says, “What the hell are we doing here?” and asks why I’m “anywhere near this nonsense.” @Username1984246 Do I?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Why was Charlie Kirk willing to tell the truth while Matt Walsh is not? What's going on? https://t.co/hsxSkCQrQq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says, "powerful institutions are at play here, and there's a coordinated effort to spread this parasitic ideology," and asks, "Are you willing to name the group behind us? Because behind all these institutions, there seems to be a Cohen, a Berg, a Stein." He then asks, "What are your thoughts on the Jewish influence about on gender ideology?" Speaker 1 replies, "So you're you're Am I gonna do anything about the Jews is what you're asking me? No." Okay. Do I need to dignify that with a further response, do think?" He adds, "Or And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits." "This is a beast created by secular Jews."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. How are doing today? Speaker 1: How are you? Speaker 0: Good. How about you? I just asked. My bad. My name is my name is Josh. And so you said yourself that powerful institutions are at play here, and there's a coordinated effort to spread this parasitic ideology. So I have a question for you. Are you willing to name the group behind us? Because behind all these institutions, there seems to be a Cohen, a Berg, a Stein. So I have a question for you. What are your thoughts on the Jewish influence about on gender ideology? Speaker 1: So you're you're Am I gonna do anything about the Jews is what you're asking me? No. Okay. Do I need to dignify that with a further response, do think? Or And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ What's going on with Matt Walsh? https://t.co/BszYGNKaid

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Matt Walsh is the kind of guy that will criticize the Pope for allegedly making a mockery of Catholicism, and then defend a jew like Stephen Miller saying he's not anti-White—all while working for the anti-White jew Ben Shapiro who mocks & denies Jesus Christ, and is loyal to a foreign country. In your own words, Matt: "What the hell are we doing here?" and why are you "anywhere near this nonsense?"

@MattWalshBlog - Matt Walsh

Right, the scandal is not that the Pope took part in a pagan climate justice ritual but that I commented on it. You should definitely keep pointing the finger of blame at commentators rather than the Church leaders who are actually doing these things. https://t.co/S2EDKeaoSG

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Username1984246 Do I?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:07 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

CHARLIE KIRK BOMBSHELL: isreali & Washington DC IP addresses caught conducting UNIQUE Google searches for Timpanogas Regional Hospital, Utah Medical Examiner Deirdre Amaro & various TRH surgeons during June/July 2025! H/t: Baron Coleman, YouTube https://t.co/IiOLpxFgyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker notes “the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk,” Tempanogos Regional Hospital, with a campus in Orem, Utah, and observes a spike in searches for “Tempanogos Regional Hospital” from BC around July 16, 2025, with a “07/20 anchor date” and the day before the shooting when someone said, “we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is.” They emphasize they are “reporting the facts” and not drawing conclusions. They question the Utah medical examiner, saying the name is “Deidre Amaro” (or Deidra Amaro) and note, “an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro,” with activity on 06/30/2025 in Israel, calling it strange and “not a common search.” They list surgeons at the Orem branch of Tempanogos Regional Hospital—“Steven Neelman,” “Robert Patterson, MD,” “Lee Trotter,” “Lee Patterson,” “Brian Gill,” “Richard Rasmussen”—searched around July 19–22, 2025, all from an “IP address originating in Israel.” The TalkingPointsUSA spokesperson claimed they spoke to the surgeon but didn’t give the name, and the speaker asks if the same IP looked up all surgeons, suggesting FBI/Utah State Police involvement and wondering if the searches relate to an assassination where a surgeon “declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and signed the death certificate.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. Wonder if anybody googled the hospital where they took Charlie Kirk. They took him to Tempanogos Regional Hospital. That's there in the district. I mean, that's there in, Utah. They have, I think, a campus in Orem, Utah. Psycho District Of Columbia. Here's where, again, on September, right there, you see the searches for Timpanogos Regional Hospital, people looking for where they could try to occur. But you'll see this spike of interest in Timpanogos Regional Hospital out of BC, and then no interest for two solid months before the shooting. But, again, keep in mind that July 20 anchor date, here we have a 07/16/2025. And then we have a July 3, and we have a June 28. And if you go out twelve months, you'll notice you even had one back then, and then this all kinda goes out. So something's going on here at the Tempanogos Ridge Hospital search. And then right the day before the shooting, somebody in the District Of Columbia says, we should really make sure we know what the Tempanogos Regional Hospital is. We really should make sure we know the day before he gets shot. So you had that July 20 anchor date, time around there. You had a time way back. That could be anything. And then the day before, somebody zeros in and says, we need to we need to look up Tempanogos Regional Hospital. Maybe looking up address. Maybe looking up who knows? Who knows? But, again, I'm just reporting the facts. I'm just reporting the facts. I'm not drawing conclusions tonight. I could give you possible conclusions. You could draw, and you could draw your own conclusion, or you could just sit back and look and learn like I did. Because after Temponogos Regional Hospital, I thought, I wonder who the I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah. I wonder who the medical examiner is in Utah because they it it appears it appears to me based on everything I've looked at that Charlie Kirk may not have had an autopsy, which I find shocking. Shocking. Because an autopsy could give you a lot of things such as what angle did the bullet come in, where did the bullet go, what type of bullet was it, what damages were done to the organs, were there any other injuries? And this is gonna come up in a minute. Were there any other injuries anywhere else in the body? And so I wondered who the medical examiner was there in Utah, and I looked her up. She's a woman named Deidra Amaro. And she was looked up, but this time not in the District Of Columbia, but in Israel, which I thought was very strange. 06/30/2025. In Israel. 06/30/2025, an IP address originating in Israel. Again, we talked last week about the ways IP address is coming up sooner. But Deidre Amaro, the medical examiner there in Utah, somebody with an IP address originating in Israel decided they were very interested in Deidre Amaro. Unless you think I didn't check. The reason I'm not showing you others, go to the District Of Columbia, for example, not there. You can even go to Utah and see. Not there. So if it's not in the District Of Columbia and it's not in Utah, this is not a very common search is what I'm pointing out here. Not a very common search at all. But there it was in Israel. So I thought that's weird. That's weird. So I press on. Alright. This one gets a little deep. This one, if you have a five point safety harness in your seat, you might wanna go ahead and fasten it. You will have full access to your entire seat. You will only need the front edge for this one. This one took a little research. I was very curious when the TalkingPointsUSA spokesperson came out and said they'd spoken to the surgeon but didn't get the surgeon's name. So I thought, who's the surgeon? Again, this is the surgeon who looked according to the TalkingPointsUSA, spokesperson who seems like a nice guy, not knocking him all. Only relaying do his job, relaying the message that he was given from the surgeon, just letting the world know about it. Fine with it. This is the guy who said, Hey, Charlie's made a steal. This bullet would have normally gone through almost anybody, but Charlie, not Charlie's made a steal. They didn't get the surgeon's name, and again, remember, Deidre Amora, they didn't do an autopsy, don't think. At least that's the news on the street, didn't do an autopsy. So I go and I get a list of all the surgeons I can find at the Orem branch of Tampanoagos Regional Hospital. And I think, could anyone have looked up any of these people? The first aid surgeon I could find was a guy named Steven Neelman. Steven Neelman. Remember that date? July 20. This is July 18. This is July 18. Steven Neilman. 07/18/2025. This was out of our friends on the other side of the planet over there. Very curious about the surgeons in Utah, you'll find out. I go to the next one I could find, Robert Patterson. I found a lot, so I added an MD to it. Robert Patterson, MD. July 2324. May have been the only one that was searched twice, two days in a row. July 2324, Robert Patterson, MD. Again, I just find online a list of surgeons at Tempanogos. I eliminate people like the breast reconstruction surgeons because I didn't think that was necessary to look up. Actually, might have looked up one of them. But I found the general surgeons, the emergency surgeons, all the people who who, minor surgery. I look them all up. I go to the next one, Lee Trotter. Has anyone looked up Lee Trotter? Again, notice the date. Notice the date. This is right in that July 20 area, that July 20 timeline. Someone with an IP address originating in Israel, looking up surgeon Lee Trotter near about that same July 20 time period. Are there other surgeons in the area? Yes. As a matter fact, is. There's a guy named Lee Patterson. So I look up Lee Patterson. Notice the date, July 19. Somebody with an IP address originating in Israel in the week of July 20, that week on either side of July 20, was very interested in all the people who practice surgery at Tippinogo's Regional Hospital in Orem, Utah. There was a lot of interest from an IP address originating there. Now let's just you know, we talked about the different. Say someone using a a VPN. At this point, if I'm the FBI or I'm the Utah State Police I think this is still Utah State Police matter, by the way. This didn't cross jurisdiction lines, I don't think. If I'm the Utah State Police, I'm calling Google and saying, I didn't know the IP addresses they did this. I didn't even know if this is belong to. VPN has belongs to this. Is it the same IP address? They looked up all the different surgeons in my county. Because there's more. By the way, there's a guy named Brian Gill, probably a very talented surgeon. July 22, IP address originating in Israel. What about Richard Rasmussen? I'm sure he's a fine surgeon. A nice guy. Probably a pillar of the community. Also searched July 14. IP address originating in Israel. Richard Rasmussen. Again, if I'm the state police, if I'm the FBI, I have real concerns that my surgeons are being searched within a very narrow time window, like seven to ten days of each other. And I wanna know is it the same IP address looking at all of them? Because I wanna know who the hell is so curious about my surgeons in my local hospital. If I'm the FBI, I might ask, is this related to an assassination where they rushed the body there, and there was a surgeon that declared Charlie Kirk a Superman and claims he found the bullet, and then signed the death certificate, and there was a watchdog. And people may have been searching the surgeon,
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:06 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

What if I told you Utah's new Medical Examiner might be jewish & likely has jewish kids? What if I told you she was also hired by a jew? What if I told you she was hired around the same time Josh Hammer began keeping tabs on Charlie Kirk? What does it all mean? Receipts: https://t.co/V8d57liWvs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tip indicated another person in this story: the medical examiner. Doctor. Deidra Weiss Amaro blew in from California and was announced as the new Utah medical examiner in May 2024. She was hired on 05/14/2024, from the University of Missouri Columbia, by Doctor. Michelle Hoffman, the deputy director of Utah Department of Health and Human Services who hired Amaro. Amaro’s ex husband was the petitioner and he hired a Jewish lawyer. Is Jason Weiss himself Jewish? This is a known pattern of Jews changing their names to anglicized forms. Josh Hammer became closely associated with Charlie Kirk around April 2024. A few weeks after, the Jewish doctor, Michelle Hoffman in Utah, reached out to Doctor. Deidra Amaro, who was getting divorced from her Jewish husband in mid May twenty twenty four and hired her to be Utah's new medical examiner. Now look into Israel's hidden Jewish helpers, the Syeneim. Is Doctor. Michelle Hoffman perhaps a Syeneim? What about Doctor. Amaro? Is she Jewish?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who would be the person that can make that fit? Look, I did receive a tip and guess what? There was another person in this never ending brand new cast of characters that was also involved in this story. And this person in an email insisted to me that this is somebody that we should look further into. That's the medical examiner. It is a woman named Doctor. Deidra Weiss Amaro. Deidra Weiss Amaro is her name and she blew in from California. She was announced as the new state medical examiner in May 2024. I'm sorry, from Missouri. I think she also worked at some point in California and she was announced as the new Utah medical examiner, state Utah medical examiner in May 2024. So I'm interested in learning as much as I can about this medical examiner. I'd like to know more about this medical examiner. And if you've got something, you know this personally, you got a story, please do send it to us at moretipscandisowens dot com. Speaker 1: Okay, please note the following about Doctor. Deirdre Amaro. She was hired on 05/14/2024. That will be an important date in just a moment. She was hired from the University of Missouri Columbia. She was hired by Doctor. Michelle Hoffman. All of this is going to become important. Here you can see the background of Doctor. Michelle Hoffman, the deputy director of Utah Department of Health and Human Services who hired Doctor. Amaro. You can see her ethnic background there. Next, see that Doctor. Deidra Amaro got divorced at roughly the same time that she got hired to be Utah's new medical examiner. Very interesting timing, wouldn't you say? Please note that her ex husband was the petitioner and he hired a Jewish lawyer. Is Jason Weiss himself Jewish? Well, his surname Weiss is suggestive that he's Jewish as are his several literally anglicized aliases. This is a known pattern of Jews changing their names to anglicized forms. But is there anything more to the timing of her hire? Listen closely to this recent testimonial from Josh Hammer. Speaker 2: And it was really only over the past, I don't know, a year and a half or so that I would say that we became closer. I started going on his show, The Charlie Kirk Show, wildly popular podcast radio show. I started going on the show more often, and we started talking very frequently. Speaker 1: So there you have it. About a year and a half ago, around April 2024, Josh Hammer became closely associated with Charlie Kirk. Was he Charlie Kirk's handler? Many have speculated that he was given the closeness of their relationship and his mysterious involvement in all of these events after the assassination of Charlie Kirk. And then a few weeks after he started becoming closely associated with Charlie Kirk, the Jewish doctor, Michelle Hoffman in Utah, reached out to Doctor. Dieter Amaro, who was getting divorced from her Jewish husband in mid May twenty twenty four and hired her to be Utah's new medical examiner. Now look into Israel's hidden Jewish helpers, the Syeneim. Is Doctor. Michelle Hoffman perhaps a Syeneim? What about Doctor. Amaro? Is she Jewish? Her husband seems to be. And if he is, then certainly her children are as well. So, is she Jewish? Is she a Syeneem as well? Is she a helper? I don't know for sure, but these are the questions that we need to be asking and getting answers to.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 3, 2025 at 12:16 AM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m wondering why Elon Musk and many Hasbara accounts push canceling Netflix now, despite years of issues. Could it be because Larry Ellison and Oracle—an Israel ally and major IDF donor—have billions in Twitter and Tesla, plus ties to Oracle-Twitter-SpaceX, and Ellison and son now own many media properties that compete with Netflix? Nah, couldn’t be, right?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Why are Elon Musk and so many Hasbara accounts pushing you to cancel Netflix now, even though it's been a known problem for years? Could it be because zionist jew Larry Ellison, of Oracle--best friend of israel, and largest private donor to the IDF--has $2 Billion invested in Twitter & Tesla, along with business relationships between Oracle and Twitter & SpaceX; and Larry & his son David Ellison now own Tiktok, Skydance, CBS, Nickelodeon, MTV, Comedy Central, BET, Showtime, Pluto TV streaming, Paramount+ streaming, Warner Bros. film/TV studio, HBO/Max streaming, CNN, Discovery Channel, DC Comics, Turner Broadcasting (TNT, TBS)--all competitors to Netflix? Nah, couldn't be, right?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm raising eyebrows at the timeline involving Charlie Kirk and Josh Hammer. Their relationship began a year and a half ago, but things took a turn when Charlie criticized Netanyahu in a letter, which Josh knew about but didn't disclose. Over the past year, Charlie faced death threats, leading to increased security. Tensions escalated at a meeting where Charlie was criticized for his support of Israel. After a cryptic Zoom call, Charlie expressed fears for his safety. Following his assassination, Josh's tweets raised questions about his knowledge and honesty regarding the situation.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Anyone else raising their eyebrows at this Charlie Kirk/Josh Hammer timeline? ▪️A year and a half ago, Josh Hammer begins to be in regular contact with Charlie Kirk ▪️May 2nd, Charlie writes a letter a pages-long letter to Netanyahu, essentially criticizing him. Later, Josh Hammer will reveal he knew about this letter, but remained silent about it, and in the meantime calling others like Candace Owens "liars" who referenced its existence. ▪️Over the past year, Charlie Kirk had been receiving numerous death threats to the point where he stepped up his security, per Erika Kirk. ▪️On July 13th, Josh Hammer expresses open and specific disgust at having to share the stage at TPUSA with Dave Smith ▪️Also July 13th, since April 2024, Hammer has been attacking Tucker Carlson, calling him the most dangerous antisemite in American history. Carlson made a notorious appearance at that same TPUSA event where Hammer was disgusted at sharing the stage with Dave Smith. How unhappy was Hammer over Charlie platforming both Smith & Carlson? Keep reading. ▪️On August 4-5, at a meeting in the Hamptons, Charlie Kirk gets into some heated discussions allegedly with Seth Dillon, Josh Hammer, and others over their perceptions of his insufficient support for israel, and specifically the platforming of Tucker Carlson. ▪️Also August 4-5, Charlie turns down $150 million from israel, offered by Netanyahu ▪️August 6th, Charlie Kirk goes on Megyn Kelly and complains about being "emotionally BLACKMAILED" over his choices regarding how he supports israel. ▪️In mid August, Charlie Kirk told multiple people he thought israel might try to kill him if he turned against them. This information made it to Harrison Smith, who posted it at the time. Charlie is not known to have disputed this. Others have confirmed he told multiple people this. ▪️On September 8th, Charlie posted a message in the group chat that he had no choice but to drop the pro-israel activism. Josh Hammer & I believe Rabbi Wolicki were part of this group chat. They both stayed silent about it. Hammer lied about Candace's claim about it that turned out to be true. ▪️On September 9th, Charlie had a mysterious Zoom call with Josh Hammer & Rabbi Wolicki, where they say they discussed Charlie's upcoming campus tour & debating with students. Even though it was scheduled to begin the next day, Hammer apparently didn't even know it was starting in Utah. Odd. Also on September 9th, Charlie texted people saying "they're going to kill me." We don't know if that was before or after the Zoom call. ▪️Also on September 9th, At dinner after the Zoom call, Erika Kirk & Charlie's "faith leader friend" both encouraged Charlie to increase his personal security by wearing a bulletproof vest or putting up bulletproof glass. What happened to escalate their worries that night? ▪️Also September 9th,after the Zoom call, Josh Hammer cryptically tweets "Based", QT'ing a random 12-year old tweet from Donald Trump calling for "public execution." ▪️September 10th, immediately after Charlie was assassinated, his close friend and associate at TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, sent screenshots of the group chat from September 8th to the FBI. Why did Kolvet surmise that that particular chat from 2 days prior would be relevant in the immediate aftermath of the assassination? ▪️Also September 10th after the assassination, Josh Hammer again cryptically tweets "Public execution" without any context. ▪️For the entire month since Charlie's group text message on September 8th, Josh Hammer has remained silent about it while calling others "liars" for saying Charlie had changed his mind on israel. ▪️After the "Based" public execution tweet from the 9th resurfaced, the entire paid-off Hasbara shill army claimed he was referring to the murder of Iryna Zarutska. Of course, by their own admission, Hammer was out of contact for the jewish holiday and not using electronic devices, so there was no way for anyone to know this. Surprise! He showed up the next day confirming this was indeed the case. But both he and the Hasbara army are still ignoring his equally cryptic "Public execution" tweet from after the assassination on the 10th. ▪️Today, Hammer posts a screenshot revealing he didn't know where Charlie's tour would be starting the next day, but knew to warn him about "Antifa." As with his 2 "public execution" tweets, day that was a little on-the-nose, wouldn't you say? Just what the f*ck does Josh Hammer know? What's he still lying about? What lies did he tell Charlie? If I ran the FBI, I'd be so far up his business he'd be brushing his teeth with Preparation H. Parting Shot: For allegedly being so close, Josh Hammer and Charlie Kirk only ever had 3 interactions on the timeline—one of them being about assassination by Left-wing hysteria. What are the odds?

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 7, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 4:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised concerns about Josh Hammer's actions surrounding Charlie Kirk's assassination. Hammer referenced a 12-year-old Trump tweet the night before the event and failed to disclose key information from a group chat where Charlie indicated a shift in his pro-Israel stance. Despite being aware of this, Hammer publicly contradicted claims made by others. I questioned the timing of his statements and the parallels between Charlie's assassination and historical cases like JFK, RFK, and MLK, suggesting potential conspiracies. I invited others to share their thoughts on these parallels.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

JOSH HAMMER TREACHERY? FACT: Josh Hammer randomly dug up a 12-year old Trump tweet about public executions the night before Charlie was assassinated. FACT: That same night before the assassination, Josh Hammer told us he had a meeting with Charlie wherein he claimed Charlie hadn't changed his mind on israel. He neglected to say anything about Charlie's group chat statement from the previous day. FACT: Josh Hammer was in the group chat where Charlie admitted he was going to have to abandon the pro-israel cause, yet Hammer remained completely silent about this and called Candace Owens a liar for claiming Charlie's stance on israel was shifting. FACT: Josh Hammer knew about the letter to Netanyahu, but remained quiet and let others break the story. Why is Josh Hammer calling people liars for making true claims while remaining silent on key pieces of insider information himself that refute his own claims? Watch Josh Hammer tell you about being in the group chat and tell you Charlie wasn't shifting his stance. This is now confirmed to be untrue and it turns out Candace Owens was telling the truth. Why did hammer lie about Candace and not produce this information himself?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past year and a half I became closer to Charlie Kirk, joining a group chat he called his 'brain trust.' We discussed Israel, Jewish–Christian relations, antisemitism. He was an adamant opponent of antisemitism. Campus talks exposed him to questions, including about the Talmud, and he provided 'very good answers'—'better answers than probably 98% of Jews probably could offer there.' We strategized to turn back the tide against rising antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment. Charlie said roughly half, 50% of the questions that he got asked were all on Israel, Jews. He organized a Zoom call the night before Utah Valley University event, the first stop of a tour, with me, Pesach Willicki, producers, and one Christian pastor. The fact that he was seeking our counsel... calls into question this narrative that he was getting ready to renounce his lifelong support for the Jewish people, for the state of Israel.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was really only over the past, I don't know, a year and a half or so that I would say that we became closer. I started going on his show, The Charlie Kirk Show, wildly popular podcast and radio show. I started going on the show more often, and we started talking very frequently. He formed a small group chat. There were probably seven or eight of us total in this group chat there. He called it his brain trust. His brain trust for thinking about Israel, for thinking about Jewish Christian relations. He was very concerned about rising antisemitism. This is something that he was an adamant opponent of. Is, Charlie, if you look at campus talks over the past couple years, he wasn't just getting asked about Israel. He not just getting asked about two state solution, about Gaza, borders, all this stuff there. No. He I mean, he was getting asked about, like, the Talmud, which is crazy. And he actually, like, was able to provide very good answers. You know, better answers than probably 98% of Jews probably could offer there. So we talked a little bit about that sort of stuff, frankly. But above all, we really strategize about how to turn back the tide against rising antisemitism and anti Israel sentiment on the American right in Republican Party circles among young Gen Z conservative activists there. And it it got to the point where these campus talks that Charlie was doing, give or take these are his words, not mine. He would say that roughly half, 50% of the questions that he got asked were all on Israel Jews, which first of all is disturbing. It's mind boggling. It's frankly disturbing. That is not a sign of a healthy society. So that's sobering in and of itself. But because of that, he did organize this Zoom call the night before he tragically was murdered. So the Utah Valley University event where he tragically was killed, just a day that will live in infamy, to borrow the FTR phrase from many decades ago. So that was supposed to be the first of a series of events. It's supposed be the first launching a campus tour. So, basically, before he set foot the first event, he wanted kind of an hour long kind of prep call. So it was me, a right wing rabbi friend of mine who lives in in in Jerusalem, Pesach Willicki, a couple of his producers, and there was one Christian pastor, and that was basically it. And Charlie had a list of questions. You know, how do I respond when the students ask me about starvation, famine, genocide, borders, two state solution, this, that, there. But the mere fact that he was seeking our counsel, and we communicated in a virtually daily basis through this active group chat and one one one on one. The fact that we were doing that along the fact that he had that particular Zoom call with people like me the night before he he he was killed, I I think really profoundly calls into question this narrative that he was getting ready to renounce his well established lifelong support for the Jewish people, for the state of Israel.

@josh_hammer - Josh Hammer

based

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

Should be public execution for all to see-you will end this bullshit fast!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Immediately after the assassination, Hammer literally quoted the Trump tweet once again. Is this suspicious? https://t.co/fyLVB9NIB9 https://t.co/1BAUELhtrR

@josh_hammer - Josh Hammer

Public execution.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Is this just a coincidence? https://t.co/9p7SA60EXB

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ If you think Tucker Carlson is a more dangerous & radical antisemite than Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, or David Duke--what action might you take to prevent Charlie Kirk from continuing to platform him to millions (or Candace Owens, for that matter)? https://t.co/mLmR4ANvDa

@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

Josh Hammer: Charlie Kirk was trying to "keep Nick Fuentes neo-Nazi Groyper stuff at bay…" "I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti-Semite…the most dangerous anti-Semite in the history of the United States…" "I was not a fan of Tucker speaking at [TPUSA] events, but Charlie deserves the benefit of doubt on these issues because again, what he was really trying to do was to kind of hold the line, to keep the Fuentes Groyper stuff decidedly on the fringe…"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie was trying to navigate this to keep the Nick Fuentes, neo Nazi, groyper stuff at bay while meeting Gen Z on their terms and guiding them toward a better place without the outmoded rhetoric and talking points of the 1970s, 1980s boomers. He aimed to "hold the line, to keep the Fuentes, Ruiper stuff decidedly on the fringe, very much out of the tent, at the movement." Charlie saw himself as a coalition leader of really MAGA, of the American right there, and sought a middle-ground foreign policy between Ron Paul isolationism and George W. Bush neoconservatism. Ali is probably why he gravitated towards my book and the Trump doctrine—conservative realist nationalist middle ground between the two poles. Think that's kind of why Charlie and I kind of saw eye to eye to eye analysis towards the end of his life. I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti Semite. I think he is the most dangerous anti Semite in the history of The United States.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What Charlie was essentially trying to do was he was essentially trying to figure out how to navigate this to keep the Nick Fuentes, neo Nazi, groyper stuff at bay while trying to meet the younger generation, the Gen Z folks who are pretty wobbly on this issue, to kind of meet them on their own terms and to try to kind of guide them towards a better place without using kind of the outmoded rhetoric and talking points of kind of the 1970s, 1980s boomers. That's essentially what he was trying to do. Now we can quibble as to whether he made the right decision here or there. I happen to not like that Tucker Carlson speaks at Turning Point USA events. I think Tucker Carlson is a malicious anti Semite. I think he's the most dangerous anti Semite in the history of The United States. Think that he is a profoundly dangerous man. Really, I genuinely feel that way actually. So I was not a fan of Tucker speaking at these events there. But Charlie deserves the benefit of doubt on these issues because, again, what he was really trying to do was to kind of hold the line, to keep the Fuentes, Ruiper stuff decidedly on the fringe, very much out of the tent, at the movement. And above all, Charlie was trying to do was to he saw himself correctly as a coalition leader, as a coalition leader of really MAGA, of the American right there. And we can kind of quibble as to where exactly you draw the line. When you're trying to kind of build an alliance of that nature there, he was trying to kind of strive towards some sort of middle way third ground foreign policy that was neither kind of Ron Paul isolationist nor a George W. Bush neoconservative. And that by the way, Ali, in some ways is probably why he gravitated towards my book and the way that I speak about this issue because I very much of, I personally am kind of of the Trump doctrine and belief, which is that there is kind of a conservative realist nationalist middle ground between the two twin poles there. Think that's kind of why Charlie and I kind of saw eye to eye to eye analysis towards the end of his life.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Every Accusation Is A Confession https://t.co/qBCbajY46b

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Now go read about the parallels between the JFK, RFK, MLK and now CJK assassinations: https://t.co/nnOjM07ned

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ElYujo14564 I'm not claiming anything. I'm asking questions that highlight something that looks suspicious.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@prankcaller2000 He sucks

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@_bozzfeed 👀

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@iowapatsfan67 If only we had the prefix code to the secret assassination chat

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Paranoidpropht I think Chris Martenson's analysis is the best: a rifle round from a different angle than the Tyler Robinson's position.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ZMTabloid 🫡

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 5, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 11:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on the implications of Charlie Kirk's recent discussions around AIPAC and U.S. aid to Israel. His comments challenge Christian Zionism and suggest a shift towards prioritizing American interests over Israeli ones. This raises questions about the reactions from Jewish communities and AIPAC, especially regarding Kirk's growing influence among youth. There's a concern about a rival organization emerging that could undermine AIPAC's power. The potential for Kirk to be seen as a threat to established interests has led me to consider the extreme measures that might be taken to neutralize such a challenge.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ 🔖CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE UPDATE. Watch this video carefully, then consider the following questions: ▪️How much do you think AIPAC & israel liked this very public discussion about ending aid to israel and debunking the idea that the Bible requires Christians to support israel financially? ▪️How much does this discussion undercut the fundamental principles of Christian zionism? ▪️Who were the "some people" who called Charlie Kirk antisemitic for criticising AIPAC? ▪️How much do you think jews liked the idea of Charlie Kirk de-prioritizing israel and framing AIPAC as putting jews & israeli interests ahead of the America people? ▪️Would jewish supremacists be happy that Charlie was endorsing & promoting the idea of jews converting to Jesus Christ & Catholicism? ▪️Yes, some jews want israel to eventually wean itself off our money (in order to ditch the golden handcuffs....someday, but not yet, of course): but do you really think they want to lose AIPAC or its totally dominant lobby status and control over elections, congress & the US government? ▪️If you think one of the reasons jews killed JFK was because he was trying to force AIPAC (AZC) to register under FARA, how concerned would jews be with this discussion? ▪️If this was what Charlie was doing & saying in public, what do you think he was doing and saying in private? ▪️Finally, what message was Charlie Kirk sending to his 250k+ TPUSA members with this forum discussion? Now consider: AIPAC's power and genius isn't simply their money—it's their capacity & ability to organize and connect media, money, lobbying & campaigns in order to create monopolies over electoral outcomes and israel-first legislation & policies. It's a fully integrated operation for jews, by jews. Further Consider: Charlie Kirk was building his own fully integrated operation with similar organizational capacity to AIPAC— ▪️Funding network becoming bigger, wider and more independent of its initial jewish donors. Do you really think if jews withdrew their support, Charlie wouldn't/couldn't have replaced it eventually? ▪️Independent & growing media presence ▪️Burgeoning campaign field operations ▪️Was capturing & organizing the youth and focusing their energy How do you think israel liked the idea of an organization that would soon have perhaps over 1 million+ members across 10,000+ high school & college chapters with campaign operations in all 50 states—who were Christ-centered America First youth, the majority of whom would want to neutralize AIPAC, would be against giving aid to israel, and would firmly believe in prioritizing the interests of the American people over israel's? How comfortable do you think jews would be with an organization that is a rival to AIPAC, that wants to end AIPAC and is popularizing that idea to millions of youth? How comfortable would they be with such a powerful organization beholden to one man, who's growing ever more independent by the day? A man who is a Christian, pushes Christian identity, pushes proto-White identity, calls for de-escalating neo-con wars, calls for an immigration moratorium, calls out the jewish role in radicalizing & ruining America on the Left, and who might/could/would possibly prioritize American interests over israel's? How comfortable would they be with hanging their zionist hat on such a Christian and his (largely) Christian organization? How comfortable would they be with entrusting the future of israel and zionism to a Christian, proto-White identitarian? Power jealously guards power for power's sake. Cartels hate competition. There's no way jewish supremacy would be happy with putting its eternal security in the hands of an independent Christian White man who wants to maybe end AIPAC and put America First. Charlie might have been mistaken about some things, but by all accounts he was a good man. Maybe he couldn't be compromised or blackmailed. And, with the loss of some major jewish donors, he signaled that he couldn't/wouldn't be straight-up bought anymore, either. -Can't be bought? -Can't be blackmailed? -Can't be reliably controlled 100%? -Is the largest influencer of youth in the country? -Is leading hundreds of thousands of youth in a direction directly opposed to your interests? -Is doing it literally at the time you want to launch your own massive youth influence campaign with a bunch of lesser influencers? WHAT DO YOU DO? ▪️Maybe you JFK him to get him out of the way. ▪️Maybe you RFK him to shut him up. ▪️Maybe you MLK him to make him a martyr for your cause. ▪️Maybe you JFK Jr. him to prevent him from ever winning Higher Office. ▪️Maybe you 9/11 the narrative in order to get America to wage a war against your enemies on the organized anti-israel Left & antisemitic Right. ▪️Maybe you launch an all-out massive propaganda and censorship campaign aimed at America's youth right on the heels of the assassination. ▪️Maybe you have your agents plant or boost a bunch of fake or false conspiracy counter-narratives to muddy the waters. ▪️Maybe you buy, bribe, extort, blackmail, intimidate & threaten anyone who might know something real & relevant into silence. ▪️Maybe you install figureheads sympathetic to israel without the same level of talent or independence as Charlie to lead TPUSA—figureheads who've gotten the message sent via Charlie getting his head blown up. Nah. Couldn't be, right? Who would do that?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion questions whether a lawmaker like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel and whether he knows the verse. The speaker cites: "Ted Cruz's Genesis twelve three." They reference "the New Testament" and "the writings of Paul where he talks about how that the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's." "Romans nine?" A participant "Ethnically Jewish" and "Converting Catholic from Judaism" asks: "Are you Catholic?" and says they have concerns about APAC. "I'm told that by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize APAC, I'm anti Semitic." Another adds: "I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country." They ask: "Do you think that the that APAC represents Again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people." "100%."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many of you guys think when a lawmaker and a man I respect like Ted Cruz uses the Bible to justify aid to Israel, doesn't even know the verse, do you guys think that's like not the best way to approach this? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: I think Ted Cruz's Genesis twelve three, I think a lot of people see that as off putting when you look at the New Testament. Why? Because I think a lot of people, they look especially at the writings of Paul where he talks about how that the new flesh is not the same as the people in the old covenant. The new flesh is everybody's. Everyone's talking about Romans nine? Yes. Yeah. Speaker 0: Are you Catholic? Speaker 1: Converting Catholic from Judaism. This is my next Speaker 0: Oh, from Judaism? Yes. Oh, wow. So so you're Jew you're ethnically Jewish. Speaker 1: Ethnically Jewish. Speaker 0: Yes. And you have concerns about APAC. Yes. Speaker 1: I do. Speaker 0: I'm told that by some people Mhmm. That if I criticize APAC, I'm anti Semitic. Speaker 1: I think it's ridiculous. Yeah. I I feel like it's great to have a concern for your country. Speaker 0: Do you think that the that APAC represents Again, I'm not saying I believe this, but I think this is what you're saying, that it represents a kind of cutting in line of prioritization away from the American people. Yes. Would you guys say that's a fair summary? Speaker 1: 100%. Speaker 0: Meaning that, like, okay. We vote. We're citizens, but a separate group gets higher priority because of whatever reasons.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 6, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 11:42 PM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING: Bully j-ish donors...leave me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause. - Charlie Kirk https://t.co/h7vybAGjRu

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my recent posts, I've explored the potential cover-up surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk, focusing on FBI Agent Robert Bohls, who was appointed shortly before the incident. I highlighted his background in coordinating investigations across multiple agencies, suggesting he could play a key role in managing a narrative. I examined the circumstances of Mehtab Syed's departure from the FBI and questioned the motives behind it. I also drew parallels between Kirk's assassination and those of JFK, RFK, and MLK, urging further investigation into these connections. Your thoughts are welcome.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION COVER-UP FOLLOW-UP (Disclaimer: this thread is for theorizing and research purposes only. None of this thread should be construed as a definitive assertion or accuasation. Do your own research.) How do you "manage" an investigation in order to protect a fake narrative? You would need a point man, right? Someone to manage & coordinate all critical points of information flow: evidence, media, law enforcement, intelligence community, possible foreign actors, etc. Enter: FBI Agent Robert Bohls, brand new head of the FBI's Salt Lake Field Office. He was installed just a few weeks before the assassination when Kash Patel unceremoneously relieved the former Special Agent in Charge, the "legendary" Mehtab Syed. What if I told you the internet lists a "Robert Bohls" as having moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, somewhere between March - June 2025? Literally down the street from the NSA's massive spying facility and also literally across the freeway/lake from UVU? Perfect positioning to help lead this "investigation" wouldn't you say? The same Robert Bohls has lived in the Northern Virginia area recently as well. That would match his known stint in Washington DC. Curiously, the same Bohls is listed as having lived in Orem several years ago. If this is the FBI's Robert Bohls, I find it noteworthy that he was acquiring housing a couple months before he was to be installed at the Salt Lake field office. Of course, this is all highly speculative. So, let's move on to what we know for sure.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Special Agent in Charge of SLC, Robert Bohls, was formerly the head of the "National Cyber Joint Task Force." What is that? It's the "primary agency responsible for coordinating" investigations and liaising with the FBI's Cybercrime division, the CIA, the DOD, DHS & the NSA. It has the "primary responsibility to coordinate, integrate & share information" across all agencies and levels of investigations. Bohls's own online "resume" (pictured below), says he's an expert on: ▪️Transnational Organized Crime (there's your international component) ▪️Various facets/levels of law enforcement (local police) ▪️Crisis Response ▪️Surveillance ▪️Evidence Response Teams ▪️"Special Operations" ▪️National Security In other words, if you need a guy who can coordinate or manage a comprehensive cover-up between local law enforcement and intel agencies, you'd be hard pressed to find someone with better skills, experience and connections to do it. (Again, I'm not making any accusations. Do your own research.)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ But what of Mehtab Syed being replace in early August? Let's review: ▪️She was "legendary", "absolutely the best" ▪️Installed in February (after the new Trump administration was already sworn in) ▪️Offered a demotion to Huntsville in August, but took retirement instead (this offered transfer/demotion is an important detail for later)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ At the time, her departure--along with the firing of various other agents--was framed as the result of racism and sexism. But, as we shall see, that was actually wrong. It was something else entirely. Intentionally or not, this was a misdirect that established a plausible, but false narrative.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ The day Charlie was assassinated, The Guardian ran a story that the order to take action against the fired FBI agents in early August came from White House aide STEPHEN MILLER ✡️! Someone who isn't in any Department of Justice/FBI chain of command. What's interesting is that: 1) Kash Patel admitted that he was forced to make these changes if he wanted to keep his own job. 2) Kash acknowledged that the FBI would be sued over many of these firings and LOSE. Yet they were willing to do it anyway. Now, we get back to the case of Mehtab Syed: she wasn't fired--she was offered a DEMOTION. But why? There it is in black and white: the FBI was not afraid of firing agents, getting sued for it, and losing. Why didn't they take this approach against Syed? Why didn't they just fire her, too? Is it because they didn't want her case going to court? Did they not want that level of scrutiny in her case? Did they want it to quietly go away? No court, no case, no discovery, no scrutiny, NO SPOTLIGHT. BTW, don't notice the ethnicity of the guy who wrote this story. Curiously, this particular article mentions NOTHING about Mehtab Syed. Why not? Did he not want us connecting Mehtab back to Stephen Miller? Was Miller behind her removal, too?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER ▪️A cover-up/conspiracy would require some kind of intelligence agency participation to some degree. ▪️A cover-up/conspiracy would probably require a point man in charge with the proximity, the tools, the connections and the expertise to pull it off. ▪️This point man would need to be installed in a way to not draw obvious controversy or attention when the change is made. ▪️The installation of this point man would need to have some element of plausible deniability or alternate explanation. IOW, you would need a point man who looks a lot like Robert Bohls. Again, I'm NOT making an accusation. I'm simply offering it as a thought experiment. If there is a point man, it could be someone else we don't know about. Questions remain: ▪️Is the Robert Bohls who moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, between March-June 2025 the same Robert Bohls that works for the FBI? ▪️If it is the same guy, why did he secure housing in Utah several weeks or months before he officially replaced Mehtab Syed? ▪️Did the order to swap out Syed indeed come from Stephen Miller? ▪️Why wasn't Syed fired like the other agents? ▪️Why was Syed removed? What else? Thoughts?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ Remember: I don't know what happened. I'm not making definitive assertions or accusations. My overriding hypothesis has been that the telltale signs of a conspiracy/cover-up are present and that we should keep an open mind, because it's way too early to make definitive decisions and conclusions--just like it would have been way too early to draw definitive conclusions only 3 weeks after the assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK. The goal of my research is to convince you that there are compelling reasons to keep digging. We owe it to Charlie. We owe it to ourselves. And we owe it to America. Tell me what you think below.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

8/ Review: The Deadly Parallels between CJK, JFK, RFK & MLK. https://t.co/yPSmxXjBwu

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACIES: ARE YOU JUST SEEING THINGS? One of the reasons people suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk—including even a possible israeli/jewish role—is because they see similarities with other high profile assassinations that involved conspiracies with israel/jewish elements, like JFK's. But until now, nobody has really systematically listed these parallels. Here's my first attempt. What parallels do you see between these and the Charlie Kirk assassination? What did I miss? Are these parallels enough to justify having these conspiracy suspicions about Charlie's assassination? Or are we just seeing things? ▪️JFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Communist" Lee Harvey Oswald) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Trip to Dallas, Parade, etc) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (TSBD vs DalTex vs Grassy Knoll; kill shot from front or back?) 5. "Magic" bullet theory 6. Medical report inconsistencies & subterfuge (botched autopsy, conflicting testimony, records tampering) 7. Straightforward jewish involvement (Dallas Citizens Council, led by jews, invited JFK to Dallas) 8. Weird jewish angle (Jack Ruby murders Lee Harvey Oswald) 9. LHO left behind notorious trail of documentary evidence, some of which may have been faked 10. Wanted to end Vietnam involvement (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 11. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 12. Was pro-israel, but also supported Palestinian Right of Return 13. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️RFK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Terrorist" Sirhan Sirhan) 2. Shot in head in front of a crowd of people 3. Big event (Just won the California Primary at Ambassador Hotel Celebration) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (Sirhan's shots came from the front & several feet away, while the death shots came from behind & close up; 10-13 shots heard vs only 8 bullets in Sirhan's gun) 5. "Magic" bullets & "Magic" shot (death bullets not a ballistics match for Sirhan's gun, kill shot came from behind, not the front) 6. Crime scene destroyed (the scene was not properly sealed allowing hundreds of people to pass through; key evidence such as the pantry door frames, ceiling tiles, and wood panels with possible bullet holes were destroyed or “lost” by the LAPD) 7. Autopsy report ignored (kill shots clearly came from behind, handwaved away at trial) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Press Secretary, Frank Mankiewicz—jewish member of the ADL—diverted RFK toward the pantry contrary to the prearranged exit through the ballroom) 9. jewish press first to establish the accepted narrative: that it was a case of Palestinian terrorism & hatred of israel (Jerry Cohen, LA Times) 10. Weird documentary evidence of the crime from the patsy (notes allegedly written by Sirhan confessing his plans to assassinate RFK; notebooks of Sirhan's writings used to paint his character to the public) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Tried to register AIPAC (AZC) under FARA 13. Supported right of israel to defend itself 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism ▪️MLK▪️ 1. Lone gunman patsy ("Racist" James Earl Ray) 2. Shot in head in front of a group of people 3. Big Event (was in Memphis to support the Black sanitation workers' strike) 4. Irregularities & inconsistencies between eyewitness observed details of the shooting and the officially approved narrative of the shooting (some eyewitnesses say they heard shots from nearby bushes rather than the alleged boarding house) 5. "Magic" bullet (the fatal bullet failed the ballistics match to the rifle that was allegedly Ray's) 6. Crime scene destroyed immediately (within hours & into the next day, city workers cut down and cleared the brush where eyewitnesses placed a possible shooter, erasing any chance of testing whether a second shooter had been hidden there; bloody towels cleaned up; balcony not secured) 7. Cause of death/Autopsy inconsistency (multiple witnesses claim MLK was murdered while still alive at the hospital) 8. Weird jewish involvement (Ray's handler was a shadowy figure named Raul who was a known associate of Jack Ruby; Ray visited a jewish plastic surgeon the month before the assassination) 9. Weird israel angle (Ray assumed the identity of Eric Galt, the manager of a Union Carbide plant that manufactured bomb triggers for israel) 10. Straightforward jewish involvement (partnered with many jews and jewish organizations) 11. Wanted to end the Vietnam War (Vietnam was a war promoted by jews that benefited israel) 12. Had recently frustrated various jewish donors for his anti-war stance who turned on him and cut him off, to his consternation 13. Originally supported israel & scheduled a trip to visit, but then canceled it and began changing his views towards becoming more pro-Palestine 14. Massive national event funeral with enormous crowds, television coverage, and powerful symbolism 15. Death quickly and cynically exploited to get new laws passed that favored jewish agendas List the parallels you see to Charlie's assassination in the comments below. Let's crowd source.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

9/ If you appreciate my research, please consider financially supporting my work, since Twitter demonetized me & nuked my paid subs: BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & Crypto options are all available here: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@shoegal0128 @chrismartenson's explanation is actually the best I've seen.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@truthtroll_X Bro, I can't stop. lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@knowledgefarmed Ty

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@marktournier2 I appreciate your appreciation

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@sandfish007 YW

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@munchmunchie_ Seethe. lol

BasedSamParker
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 2:16 AM
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 8:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread discussing the potential management of an investigation to protect a narrative surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I speculated about FBI Agent Robert Bohls, who became head of the Salt Lake Field Office shortly before the incident. I noted his recent move to Saratoga Springs, UT, near significant intelligence facilities, and his previous residences in Northern Virginia and Orem. While these connections raise questions, I emphasized that my points are speculative and encouraged others to conduct their own research.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION COVER-UP FOLLOW-UP (Disclaimer: this thread is for theorizing and research purposes only. None of this thread should be construed as a definitive assertion or accuasation. Do your own research.) How do you "manage" an investigation in order to protect a fake narrative? You would need a point man, right? Someone to manage & coordinate all critical points of information flow: evidence, media, law enforcement, intelligence community, possible foreign actors, etc. Enter: FBI Agent Robert Bohls, brand new head of the FBI's Salt Lake Field Office. He was installed just a few weeks before the assassination when Kash Patel unceremoneously relieved the former Special Agent in Charge, the "legendary" Mehtab Syed. What if I told you the internet lists a "Robert Bohls" as having moved to Saratoga Springs, UT, somewhere between March - June 2025? Literally down the street from the NSA's massive spying facility and also literally across the freeway/lake from UVU? Perfect positioning to help lead this "investigation" wouldn't you say? The same Robert Bohls has lived in the Northern Virginia area recently as well. That would match his known stint in Washington DC. Curiously, the same Bohls is listed as having lived in Orem several years ago. If this is the FBI's Robert Bohls, I find it noteworthy that he was acquiring housing a couple months before he was to be installed at the Salt Lake field office. Of course, this is all highly speculative. So, let's move on to what we know for sure.

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 11:41 PM
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 4:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed Charlie Kirk's relationship with Israel, emphasizing that despite his support, he failed to bolster its standing among youth. His shift from a pure supporter to acknowledging criticisms of Israel negatively impacted his credibility and the narrative surrounding Israel. While he built a powerful youth organization, this growth posed a threat to Jewish influence, leading to speculation about his potential removal as a liability. I explored historical parallels, suggesting that Israel might view his independence as a risk, possibly leading to drastic actions against him.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ It literally doesn't matter how much Charlie Kirk loved israel and supported it. Below is a summary of why they might take him out anyway. (bookmark and share) ▪️Fact: As a pure shill who didn't platform any criticism of israel & defended them no matter what, Charlie Kirk did not stop the loss of support for israel amongst the youth. The best you can say is that he slowed the loss of support. Maybe. ->Net effect for israel: Neutral. Charlie wasn't hurting israel's cause, but he wasn't helping its cause, either. Support for israel still dropped regardless of his efforts. The ROI for israel wasn't positive, but maybe you could say it was neutral. Maybe. ▪️Fact: As support for israel fell, Charlie's "pure-shill" approach tanked his own credibility. ->Net Effect for israel: Slightly negative. Created a more strident opposition to Charlie, while fewer youth took him seriously and started listening more to his critics. ROI trending in the negative direction. ▪️Fact: Charlie became troubled by certain things and voiced concerns over them like 10/7, war with Iran, AIPAC, foreign aide, and Epstein. Was he changing sides? No. Were they deal-breakers for him? No. Did he still love israel? Yes. Did he still want israel to be successful? Yes. But he acknowledged these as problem areas that couldn't be ignored. ->Net effect for israel: Slightly negative. Your boy has some issues with you he didn't have before. And he's talking about them out loud to people. That's a negative development! ROI trending more to the negative. Fact: 1) Because he was losing credibility, and 2) because he had started being personally troubled by a few things (albeit lightly), and 3) because despite his best efforts he was still losing the narrative war—he changed his approach from being a pure shill to a strategy called "taking the garbage out." It's where you openly acknowledge fair criticisms up front, so that you can deal with them, remove them as obstacles, make people feel heard, and then get back on track toward the end goal—in this case, supporting israel. That meant platforming voices & points of view critical of israel that he'd previously discouraged. ->Net effect: Decidedly negative. Israel doesn't like *any* criticism. And any new criticism allowed now that was previously disallowed, would only have the incremental effect of moving even more people away from supporting israel. Furthermore, he made it okay to be a part of TPUSA while still harboring negative views of israel. ROI trending more negative still. ▪️Fact: Charlie might have been failing in turning around the falling support for israel, but he was succeeding in building a youth organization juggernaut 2nd to none. Projections placed it on track for over 7,000 chapters and 1 million+ members. That's a lot of power and influence. ->Net effect for israel: Negative. Do you think israel would really be happy that its leading voice for zionism in America was an evangelical Christian, who was America First and promoting Christian, proto-White identity? Someone who overshadowed Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, the ADL (whom Charlie opposed) and all the other uber-zionist jews? Do you really think it would be happy that over 50% of the youth in such an organization would have anti-israel views? Do you really think they were happy to be funding an organization where these israel-critical youth were positively affirmed by Charlie as long as they still loved Jesus and were America First? Do you think they were happy that Charlie was building a national behemoth of media, campaign organization and fund-raising that was more beholden to him than israel with every passing day? How does a host react when its symbiote gets too big? EVEN IF THE SYMBIOTE LIKES THE HOST IT'S STILL A PROBLEM! ROI going more negative! Fact: Charlie Kirk was against the expansion of social media censorship and had locked horns with the ADL over it. But, the ADL is a critical component in waging israel's information war via censorship. Charlie supported Hasbara, dialog and propaganda operations—yes—but he did NOT support broad censorship—especially on Tiktok. How would Charlie have reacted to getting censored by the ADL on Tiktok? 😬 ->Net effect for israel: Negative. He would have stood in the way of the full weaponization of Tiktok that israel has planned. Fact: Israel wants to expand its youth information warfare blitz, but any efforts to conduct a full-spectrum offensive through the youth would necessarily bump up against TPUSA, since it's literally and figuratively the "Big Man On Campus." -> Net effect for israel: Negative. As I've shown, TPUSA under Charlie's paradigm was actually detrimental to israel, not helpful, resulting in negative ROI—especially with regards to the future growth of TPUSA and its influence. Therefore, TPUSA under Charlie would actually have hindered israel's full social-media/youth-blitz ambitions rather than helping them to the extent that israel wants. Would a Ben-Shapiro boosted Brilyn Hollyhand have even been possible if Charlie Kirk were still with us? No. Lol Would all these new, unironic, unquestionably israel-first influencers israel is deploying be able to have maximum impact without Charlie's imprimatur? Fact: Charlie was a massive supporter of israel. Charlie loved them. I don't think for a second he was turning on them. But it doesn't matter, because despite his efforts, he was failing and contributing negatively to israel's messaging agenda. And because he was succeeding in building a powerful, vibrant organization around non-israel related issues, he was actually becoming a threat to jewish power. He wouldn't have seen himself that way, and the untrained eye wouldn't see it that way, but jewish supremacists would see it that way. Power jealously guards power, and there's no way jews would want to have to negotiate with or through a pro-White Christian Charlie Kirk to win the concessions, protections and privileges they want. An independent Charlie Kirk was NOT on their menu. You can say that jews controlled him through money, and that he wasn't independent. And maybe that was true in the past. But at this point with 2,100 chapters and 250,000 members and growing, do you really think Charlie couldn't have replaced whatever funding he might have lost from jews pulling out? We have to look at the future of this, as surely Charlie's enemies would have: What if at some future point, hardcore support for israel were to be enough of a weight around TPUSA's neck? Would Charlie ever (*GASP*) de-prioritize his pro-israel stance and make it secondary to his America-First stance? That would be seen as catastrophic by israel-first jews. Israel would rather have torpedoed Tiktok than allow it to continue on as it was. Ultimately, they were able to engineer a hostile takeover. By the same token, I believe israel would rather have seen TPUSA go away than to see it grow massively with a membership significantly against israel, with a leader that—while personally aligned—was still independent of them, pushing other agendas they don't really like. So maybe they engineered another hostile takeover? If you tally up the score from the above analysis, you'll see that despite Charlie Kirk's personal proclivities, and despite his best efforts, he was delivering negative ROI now, with even more negative ROI predicted for the future. That made him a LIABILITY. How do you turn a NEGATIVE LIABILITY into a POSITIVE ASSET when all other efforts have failed? Maybe you make him a martyr. Maybe that's what you do. Maybe you make his death worth more than his life and exploit it. And maybe you do it before he truly gets too big and too independent and it's too late for you to act. ▪️Count Bernadotte saved jews. They still killed him. ▪️JFK was a string supporter of jews and israel. They still killed him. ▪️The US provided material, financial & intelligence support for israel in the 6-Day War. They still tried to sink the USS Liberty. ▪️George HW Bush and Bill Clinton both were great allies to israel. Yet they tried to assassinate Bush and blackmail Clinton—all without the full knowledge and understanding of the public at the time. ▪️The US was israel's "Greatest Ally," but they still did 9/11 to get us to go to war in the Middle East to take out their enemies. Do you really think they'd bat an eye over taking out a White Christian man who was preaching Jesus, America First, Christian identity, proto pro-White identity, a total immigration moratorium, the de-escalation of jewish neo-con driven foreign wars; and was outright denouncing the role of Left-wing jewish organizations in the degradation and radicalization of our society—in service of a greater self-serving scheme? I'm not saying israel did it. I'm not making that claim for sure. But I am saying that if you reject it out-of-hand because "Charlie Kirk loved israel!" then you're simply not looking at the whole picture. It's been 3 weeks. Neither JFK, RFK, or MLK were solved after 3 weeks, nor could they have been. And it would likewise be folly to definitively reject an israeli role now, given their track record and the parallels between JFK, RFK, MLK and now "CJK." (next tweet below) Finally, let's not forget that one of the prime beneficiaries of a "War on the Radical Left" is israel (80% of Democrats think israel is committing genocide). Cui bono?

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 29, 2025 at 7:05 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 2:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the potential motives behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, who was building a powerful organization, TPUSA, that was becoming independent from traditional allies like Israel and the Republican Party. As TPUSA grew, it attracted a youth demographic that was increasingly critical of Israel, which could threaten the established power dynamics. I speculated that Kirk's influence made him a liability for those invested in maintaining control, leading to the possibility that he was seen as more valuable dead than alive. The timing of his assassination coincided with significant shifts in social media and political landscapes.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ UPDATE: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE—WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A SYMBIOTE GETS TOO BIG FOR ITS HOST'S APPETITE? (🔖& share this, then tell me your thoughts below after reading) Charlie Kirk was building an organization that supported israel & the Republican Party. A useful ally for them. Strategic partners for all involved. A symbiosis. But it was getting bigger than that. With each passing day, TPUSA was becoming a rival power center outside the direct jurisdictional control of either israel-first jewish zionists or the Republican Party—while also consistently moving out of its ideological alignment with either of them. Consider the following: TPUSA had eclipsed all its nearest competitors, including the College Republicans, and was poised to leave them all in the dust. It is (was) becoming one of the most powerful & influential political and cultural organizations in America—outside the jurisdictional control of any government entity, domestic or foreign. By 2036, reasonable growth projections for TPUSA put it on track to have 7,000-18,000 high school & college chapters for a total membership of 1-2 million. Note: the exact numbers aren't necessarily as important as the general magnitude they convey. They're directionally accurate and tell a troubling story for some of Charlie's prominent traditional allies. Think of it: a national organization without equal, outside any formal or direct chain of command to either the Republican Party or israel proper. A national organization of energized youth who were trending anti-israel and being exposed to israel-critical attitudes & positions. Members who were being allowed to hold those positions and still be in good standing. Being allowed to hold those positions and still be part of the conservative, "America First" community—while enjoying jewish money & support! The chutzpah! A national organization with offices and campaign ground-game in key battleground states. Staffed by the energized youth of America. Youth that again, are trending anti-israel and America-First. A national organization with its own media operation and vast network of donors. A national organization beholden to one man: Charlie Kirk. Not israel. Not the Republican Party. There's a real scenario where in 2036 Charlie Kirk had a national campaign organization in all 50 states, full-spectrum media, and a full fund-raising network completely faithful and loyal to him! Yes, Charlie was allied to zionist groups and Republican interests. He was even funded, in part, by them. But he was also allied with, and funded by, Christian interests. Ultimately, Charlie was a Christian who preached & evangelicized for Jesus Christ. He loved jews, but he wasn't jewish. Charlie was America First, not israel first. And while he broadly supported israel & jews, he made it clear that his allegiances were to Jesus Christ and the United States of America. And that's what he actively emulated & embodied to his followers. Do you think that jews were happy that in the near future, the top voice in America for jews, israel & zionism would be a America-First evangelical Christian with pro-White leanings who spoke out against the jewish responsibility for much of the degeneracy & radicalization of the American Left? How would it sit with Jewish Supremacists that if they wanted anything done for jews or Israel in the future, they'd have to eventually go through a radically Christian, nominally pro-White, America-First g0y who platforms criticisms of both Right-wing and Left-wing jewish supremacy? I assure you, many were seething over it. If you don't believe me, just refer to how the ADL has added TPUSA to its antisemitism database or just do an internet search. Many jews hated Charlie Kirk, including Right-wing zionist jews. Charlie diverged from a Right-wing jews on prioritizing American interests over israeli interests, in social media censorship & censorship of "hate" speech, and in his own version of "Hasbara." Obviously, he was very far afield with the Left-wingers over issues like pornography, open borders, and communism. How do you think jews liked this looming future where their money and support builds an organization that would eclipse their ability to directly & comprehensively control it? By the same token, Charlie's positions were straying further from the mainstream GOP uniparty on a host of issues, namely: restrictions on visas, total immigration moratorium, withdrawal from neocon-driven foreign wars in Ukraine & Iran, Christian Nationalism, & an emerging defense of White identity. The GOP has no interest in any of these things, doubly so considering AIPAC largely controls it. And how do you think the AIPAC-GOP elite viewed the future of Charlie Kirk and his TPUSA organization? Do you think that they were happy with the prospects they'd soon have to play ball with him as an electoral king-maker that they'd have to kiss up to, rather than order around or manipulate as their useful stooge? Much of the power of AIPAC isn't in the money, it's their coordinated media operation and organizational capacity & competence. A capacity, competence & media operation Charlie Kirk was building through TPUSA. *RED ALERT* And why do I mention the GOP now? Because if there's a conspiracy involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk; if there's a cover-up to hide israeli involvement—could israel pull it all off themselves? Maybe. There's probably a case to be made. But, more believably, wouldn't israel need help from US intelligence operations, or at the very least a network of compromised individuals in that sphere? And who controls those? Who's the current ruling regime? What motive would it have to be involved in such a cover-up? Is not the spectre of a rival "3rd Party" power locus not comprehensively beholden to them a compelling consideration? No cartel likes to be displaced, much less competed with. So whether it was voluntary or coerced cooperation, there's probably a regime element involved. I think the data is clear: Charlie Kirk & TPUSA began as a useful golem. But like so many golems, he was getting too big, too powerful & too independent. A symbiote that was poised to outgrow its host. And even if Charlie hadn't been moving in a direction unpalatable to jews and the GOP (which he certainly was), that would still be a threat to their power. Power jealously guards power for powers' sake. Maybe Charlie Kirk started flying too close to the sun. And given that by all accounts Charlie was a good man, a righteous soul—the normal methods of ensuring institutional control like blackmail & extortion were not an option. Maybe they even tried and failed. Maybe the conspirators thought they had no choice left but to clip his wings—and sooner rather than later. So there's your plausible motive narrative. Sure, it's speculative. But isn't it worth considering and keeping your mind open to? As for the timing, I'm still working on that, but consider the case I made yesterday regarding the full-spectrum influence operation israel has launched in the aftermath of Charlie's assassination: tiktok acquisition, calls for more censorship by Netanyahu & the ADL, and Brilyn Hollyhand & the whole gaggle of influencers israel is trying to foist on us. Charlie was in the way of all that. (see thread below for more) Thoughts?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Addressing the issue of timing: https://t.co/BHOb1bcHFv

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ You know who was a harsh critic of more social media censorship in order to protect israel—especially on Tiktok—and would have opposed it? Charlie Kirk You know who opposed the ADL's "hate speech" characterizations & criticized Jonathan Greenblatt for wanting to impose more censorship? Charlie Kirk You know who ran the largest youth organization in the country, with 2,100 college & high school chapters and over 250,000 members? Charlie Kirk You know who was the most influential & organized leader of youth in the country? Charlie Kirk You know who stood in the way of the massive social media propaganda campaign to boost Brilyn Hollyhand, the 18-yr old ultra unironic pro-israel Charlie Kirk clone? Charlie Kirk You know who overshadowed the recent massive youth influencer operation israel started rolling out in perfect coordination with its acquisition of Tiktok & Ben Shapiro's boost of Brilyn Hollyhand? Charlie Kirk You know who would have criticized Benjamin Netanyahu for coming to American soil and calling for israeli weaponization of social media against israel's enemies (i.e. anyone who criticizes israel)? Charlie Kirk You know who wouldn't have bought into the propaganda blitz by total israel-first shills & would have continued platforming high-level, prominent criticism of israel (albeit limited)? Charlie Kirk If you suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but are struggling with motive and/or timing, what do you think Charlie Kirk might say?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Motive Part 1: Charlie Kirk was a actually a liability for israel https://t.co/HZAFJL9Qcr

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE ELUSIVE MOTIVE: WAS CHARLIE KIRK WORTH MORE DEAD THAN ALIVE? Why Charlie Kirk's Strong Support For Zionism & Israel Might Not Be As Important As You Think. (🔖This thread) That's the central idea I will explain in this thread, and you must read it in its entirety to get the whole picture. DISCLAIMER: this is all highly speculative. It's way too early to possibly know anything for certainty. For example, it would have been impossible to understand or figure out israel's motives for assassinating JFK in the first 2 weeks afterward. However, because there's uncertainty, I believe it's important to keep an open mind, so let's play this scenario out. For many reasons, which I'll connect, it's possible to see Charlie as more valuable dead than alive from the perspective of jewish supremacy. And if it's possible to see it that way, then we have motive. Again: It's important to keep an open mind & read this thread all the way to the end to see all the interconnecting parts. And despite it being highly speculative, I think it's both coherent and plausible.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@bvenus @RyanMattaMedia @MyronGainesX @Villgecrazylady @IanCarrollShow Yw, Brenda!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@damaya_khaya @RyanMattaMedia @MyronGainesX @Villgecrazylady @IanCarrollShow 💯

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@BillBottrell @RyanMattaMedia @MyronGainesX @Villgecrazylady @IanCarrollShow If not 2028, certainly by 2032. Charlie probably would have been a front-runner for the AZ governor slot in 2028. Then a probable presidential candidate in 2032 or 2036. With an unparalleled machine behind him, beholden to him.

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on Charlie Kirk's strong stance against social media censorship, particularly regarding Israel and TikTok. He opposed the ADL's definitions of "hate speech" and criticized its leaders for pushing for more censorship. As the head of a major youth organization, he was a significant figure among young people. Kirk also challenged efforts to promote pro-Israel narratives and would have criticized calls for weaponizing social media against critics of Israel. If one were to consider a conspiracy around his assassination, it would be interesting to ponder what Kirk himself might have said about it.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ You know who was a harsh critic of more social media censorship in order to protect israel—especially on Tiktok—and would have opposed it? Charlie Kirk You know who opposed the ADL's "hate speech" characterizations & criticized Jonathan Greenblatt for wanting to impose more censorship? Charlie Kirk You know who ran the largest youth organization in the country, with 2,100 college & high school chapters and over 250,000 members? Charlie Kirk You know who was the most influential & organized leader of youth in the country? Charlie Kirk You know who stood in the way of the massive social media propaganda campaign to boost Brilyn Hollyhand, the 18-yr old ultra unironic pro-israel Charlie Kirk clone? Charlie Kirk You know who overshadowed the recent massive youth influencer operation israel started rolling out in perfect coordination with its acquisition of Tiktok & Ben Shapiro's boost of Brilyn Hollyhand? Charlie Kirk You know who would have criticized Benjamin Netanyahu for coming to American soil and calling for israeli weaponization of social media against israel's enemies (i.e. anyone who criticizes israel)? Charlie Kirk You know who wouldn't have bought into the propaganda blitz by total israel-first shills & would have continued platforming high-level, prominent criticism of israel (albeit limited)? Charlie Kirk If you suspect a conspiracy behind the assassination of Charlie Kirk, but are struggling with motive and/or timing, what do you think Charlie Kirk might say?

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 27, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 11:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared details about a private meeting at the Israeli Embassy involving influencers like Yair Netanyahu, Emily Austin, and others, aimed at enhancing their presence on TikTok and Twitter. I received additional names from followers, including Eyal Yakoby and Savannah Craven Antao. Some commenters expressed skepticism about the meeting's intentions, while others pointed out the influencers' prominence on social media platforms. The conversation continued with various reactions and requests for more information.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

REVEALED: Netanyahu's Private Meeting of Influencers at the israeli Embassy to help "take over Tiktok and Twitter" ▪️Yair Netanyahu ▪️Emily Austin ▪️Debra Lea Schwartzben ▪️judeanceo: Shay Szabo ▪️Lizzy Savetsky ▪️ThatZionistGirl: _thatopinionatedgirl_ (name unknown) ▪️Destiny Albritton ▪️Emily Talento ▪️Isaac Woodward ▪️Cam Higby ▪️Hannah Faulkner ▪️Liv Layne ▪️Dominique Hoffman ▪️dimas_e_g: thatlatinozionist (name unknown) ▪️Luke W. Moon H/t: @GenXGirl1994

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ 2 more: Eyal Yakoby & Danya Avner (via @GenXGirl1994) https://t.co/3fH4FGYco8

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GenXGirl1994 3/ Another? Ben Soffer (@boywithnojob_) https://t.co/hsXC5Jnh54 https://t.co/na4BDCmXkJ

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GenXGirl1994 4/ Another: Savannah Craven Antao Thx to @disciplediondra https://t.co/KlvAtS55d6

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@GenXGirl1994 It's in the thread, yes. Keep them coming. There are a couple more, maybe.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@jineeminee Guessing the "nah" option

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@NickHammac @ThatZionistGirl Imagine being a Catholic and selling out to jews. Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@ShortsDust95835 (((Bernays)))

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@geochaben israel makes no such distinction, why do you?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@iheartmindy They're not meant for people like us. But a few of them are prominent on here. But big presences on Tiktok and insta.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@OVRT1ME They're not for you.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@BangTheClose @GenXGirl1994 Ask a guy by the name of Charlie Kirk

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Mia_Stretch This guy's office, perhaps? I don't know. https://t.co/a58YXRsZpV

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@uncensoreddotai Always

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@disciplediondra Pics please

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Sputnik3333333 @HarrisonHSmith Wait what? Lol

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@RedPillMediaX None.

View Full Interactive Feed