TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @DrWojakMD

ValerieAnne1970
Posted - November 19, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Saved - November 23, 2025 at 7:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
ValerieAnne1970 questions vaccines, alleging SIDS spikes after vaccinations and rushes in safety monitoring; claims saline placebos and questionable controls, links schedule to infant deaths, and asks if natural immunity is better. DrWojakMD replies that unvaccinated children are healthier and urges saving charts to counter vaccine advocates. ValerieAnne1970 thanks DrWojakMD for a thread of charts.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 "If I Had Kids Today? ZERO Vaccines"—Dr. Pierre Kory, MD SIDS spikes at 2,4,6 months old...right after vax appts. Myth busted: Vaccines skip 2-6yr pharma safety checks. CDC/FDA rubber-stamps after DAYS: • Hep-B: 147 kids, **5 days** monitored. Approved. • Hep-A: **42 days**. • Polio: **3 days**. • MMR: **42 days**. • RSV: **31 days**. • DTaP: **30 days**. • Gardasil: **30 days**. No saline placebos—ever. "Controls"? Aluminum or OTHER VACCINES: • Gardasil: Hep-A + alum. • Flu A: Flu B. • Meningitis: DTaP. • Polio: Diluted polio. • Vaxelis: Cocktail of toxins. US: #1 vax schedule = #1 infant deaths. 97% SIDS? Within **7 days** post-shot. Your kid's vax regrets? Natural immunity wins? 👇 #VaccineMyth #SIDS #InformedConsent

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the myth that vaccines are safe and necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease is false. He claims vaccines have never been tested for safety and that there are no placebo-controlled trials; in trials, the control group is given the immunogens that are in the vaccine, making the comparison deceptive. He emphasizes that vaccines typically contain a protein plus an accompanying substance—the adjuvant or immunogen—that stimulates an immune response, and that these adjuvants (such as aluminum or other substances) by themselves are dangerous. When the control group receives these adjuvants along with the experimental group, he says the side effects are similar, describing this as a “slight hand trick” and “extremely deceptive.” He notes that for the last forty years people have been shouting that there has not been a true placebo-controlled trial with saline. He then argues that if one looks at the history of all the childhood illnesses that vaccines target, they were almost all nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. He claims that the impression vaccines stop childhood illnesses is not true; almost all illnesses had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development, and some antibiotics. Regarding the vaccines themselves, he states that the true data and history of these vaccines are “really horrible.” He mentions a history of lack of safety and relates it to sudden infant death syndrome, asserting that it “suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule” and asks when death occurs. He asserts that sudden infant death syndrome is reproducible in that it occurs at two months, four months, and six months, and that most of those deaths occur within days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. He concludes with a strong personal stance: if he had his young children today, he would not give them a single vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The myth of vaccines that, a, they are safe and, b, they are necessary and that they eradicated childhood disease, that is a myth. They've never been tested for safety. There are no placebo controlled trials. They always put in the control group the immunogens that's in the vaccine. So right? So vaccines typically have a protein and then an accompanying substance, which you call the adjuvant or the immunogen, which stimulates an immune response, those adjuvants, whether it be aluminum or other substances, those by themselves are dangerous and so when you put that in the control group as well as the experimental group and you say that the side effects are similar so that it's safe, it's a slight hand trick. It's extremely deceptive. People have been screaming about this from the sidelines that for the last forty years they refused to do a true placebo controlled trial like with saline. The other thing that people have to recognize is if you look at the history of all the childhood illnesses Yes. That we vaccinate against aggressively, they almost all were nearly eradicated before the introduction of the vaccine. We're all left with the impression that the vaccines stop childhood illnesses. That is not true. Almost all of them had reduced to extremely low levels due to sanitation and hygiene, development and some antibiotics. But the truth about the vaccines is really stunning. You know, after the study of the history of the vaccines, their their lack of safety, sudden infant death syndrome, which which suddenly came out of nowhere as we suspended the schedule, Suddenly from death syndrome, when does it occur? It's reproducible. It occurs at two months, four months, and six months. What else occurs at those? And most of those deaths are within either days to a couple of weeks of the vaccine. And so the the true data and history of these childhood vaccines are so horrible that I've said in public that if I had my young children today, I will tell you they would not get a single vaccine. Vaccine.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

@ValerieAnne1970 There's no way around it: unvaccinated children are healthier. Save these charts—and shove them in the faces of vaccine zealots. https://t.co/wLGV75kW7G

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/19) 🚨⚠️ Unvaccinated Children are Indisputably Healthier — A Thread Vaccine makers and public health agencies flat-out refuse to conduct proper safety studies. But independent research clearly shows the unvaccinated are healthier. 🧵👇

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@DrWojakMD Fantastic thread of charts Dr Wojak.

DrWojakMD
Posted - October 28, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Saved - November 20, 2025 at 6:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that unvaccinated children are healthier, and that proper safety studies are lacking despite calls from IOM and the CDC. A few independent studies over 20 years reportedly show healthier unvaccinated kids, while critics offer excuses. Families report patterns across siblings, and Dr. Zervos’s case is cited as career pressure. The schedule has expanded from 7 vaccines in 1986 to 130+ today. Read my Substack for full details and sources.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/19) 🚨⚠️ Unvaccinated Children are Indisputably Healthier — A Thread Vaccine makers and public health agencies flat-out refuse to conduct proper safety studies. But independent research clearly shows the unvaccinated are healthier. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/19) For the complete breakdown and all source links, read the full article on my Substack: https://drwojakmd.substack.com/p/unvaccinated-children-are-healthier

Unvaccinated Children are Indisputably Healthier The vax-unvax studies prove it. drwojakmd.substack.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/19) People have been clamoring for vax-unvax studies for decades. Not just grieving mothers of vaccine-injured children, but also the Institute of Medicine has been asking the CDC since 2013. The CDC admits in writing that it has never conducted such a study.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/19) Miraculously, over the 20 years, a handful of independent researchers—despite great cost to their careers—have conducted such studies. The results are consistent: unvaccinated children are much healthier. Vaccine proponents have no serious answer to this.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/19) The excuses are absurd: nitpicking trivial details, insisting they can’t find enough unvaccinated children to study, or—if they can—claiming that such studies are “unethical” (a pretext that somehow never applies to any other medical intervention).

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/19) The following charts are devastating for vaccine zealots. For 20 years, every study has shown the same pattern: unvaccinated children are far healthier.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/19) Across the board, vaccinated children have several-times higher rates of chronic disease, developmental disorders, and long-term health problems. Save these charts.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(12/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(13/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(14/19)

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(15/19) Testimony from families. For those who prefer personal experiences to charts, parents with multiple children report a clear pattern: - 1st child, fully vaxxed, develops chronic health issues. - 2nd, partially vaxxed, fewer issues. - 3rd, unvaxxed, by far the healthiest.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(16/19) Career over children. Dr. Zervos’s 2020 Henry Ford study—buried to protect his career—is especially revealing. He was secure, near retirement, and had vowed to publish no matter what. He still caved. If he couldn’t speak the truth, what chance do younger doctors have?

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(17/19) Every independent study tells the same story: unvaccinated children are healthier. There’s no way around it. Stop trusting your doctor.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(18/19) In 1986, the CDC’s schedule had 7 childhood vaccines. By 2025, it’s 5 for pregnancy, 70+ for kids, and 130+ for adults—more with non-routine shots. You’d think they’d conduct proper safety studies before mass injecting our kids.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(19/19) Read the full article (with more details and sources) on my Substack: https://drwojakmd.substack.com/p/unvaccinated-children-are-healthier 🚨 Follow me there for deeper dives exposing medicine’s biggest lies—and here for more threads like this one.

Unvaccinated Children are Indisputably Healthier The vax-unvax studies prove it. drwojakmd.substack.com
DrWojakMD
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 1:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pharmaceutical companies are widely recognized as corrupt, yet many continue to rely on their products. Despite being the most hated industry in America, with a history of severe misconduct and criminal behavior, 70% of Americans take pharmaceutical drugs daily. The industry has faced over $60 billion in fines for various offenses, including fraud and causing deaths. Trust in doctors often leads to blind acceptance of these products, which are underpinned by a corrupt system. Ultimately, using these drugs can be seen as complicity in organized crime.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/33) 🚨⚠️ Pharma is Organized Crime — and 95% of people have cognitive dissonance about it. Everyone knows Big Pharma is corrupt. But they still take its drugs in massive quantities. It’s akin to trusting a convicted, unrepentant pedophile to babysit your kids. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/33) For the complete breakdown and all source links, read the full article on my Substack: https://drwojakmd.substack.com/p/pharma-is-organized-crime Here are some highlights.

Pharma Is Organized Crime And 95% of people have cognitive dissonance about it. drwojakmd.substack.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/33) Big Pharma is the most hated industry in America. Gallup polls rank it below oil, banks—even government. But somehow, 70% of Americans take pharma drugs daily. And 95% of parents inject their kids with them.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/33) The pharmaceutical industry isn’t just corrupt—it’s structurally, systemically, and unrelentingly criminal. Not low-level crime—but organized crime that puts the mafia to shame, with death tolls rivaling most wars.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/33) Robert F. Kennedy Jr., U.S. HHS Secretary, describes the industry as a “criminal cartel” run by “the most corrupt companies in the world.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/33) Richard Smith, former editor-in-chief of The BMJ, one of the world’s top five most prestigious medical journals, asserts that the pharmaceutical industry meets the legal criteria for organized crime.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/33) Peter Gøtzsche, renowned researcher and co-founder of Cochrane, a globally authoritative institution in evidence-based medicine, insists that the pharmaceutical industry is not marred by a few bad actors but is entirely corrupt.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/33) Peter Rost, a former vice president at Pfizer—one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world—turned whistleblower, warns that the industry bears frightening similarities to organized crime.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/33) Most are familiar with Purdue Pharma, which lied about the addictiveness of OxyContin, unleashing an opioid epidemic that’s killed over 700,000 Americans—more than 7x all U.S. military deaths in the Vietnam, Korean, and Iraq wars combined. And that’s just one company.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/33) Here's a small sample of some notable crimes from four other major pharmaceutical companies—the same four companies that collectively manufacture every vaccine on the U.S. childhood schedule. The full rap sheet would fill a library.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/33) GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) — Avandia: Caused ~83,000 excess heart attacks. Settled for $3B. — Synflorix trial: 14 babies died in Argentina.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(12/33) Merck — Vioxx: 100,000+ heart attacks and deaths. Settled for $4.85B. — Medicaid fraud & kickbacks. Settled for $650M.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(13/33) Sanofi — Depakine: 15,000–30,000 French children with birth defects. — Dengvaxia: 20+ dead children in the Philippines.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(14/33) Pfizer — Trovan trial: 11 Nigerian children dead. — Bextra kickbacks: Bribes, fraud, illegal promotion. Settled for $2.3B.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(15/33) The receipts are endless.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(16/33) Pharma isn’t just another corrupt industry. It’s in a league of its own—measured in fraud, harm, and human lives.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(17/33) 💰 The Most Fined Industry in U.S. History The pharmaceutical industry has paid more in criminal and civil penalties than any other sector in U.S. history, with total fines exceeding $60 billion from hundreds of settlements since the early 1990s.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(18/33) 🏦 Most Frequent Violator of the False Claims Act Pharmaceutical companies are the leading violators under the False Claims Act, the federal government’s primary legal weapon against fraud on government healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(19/33) 🔁 Systematic Recidivism Pharmaceutical companies stand out not only for the size of their penalties but also for their extraordinary frequency of repeat offenses.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(20/33) 💀 Deadly Impact Unlike most other industries, pharmaceutical industry corruption directly causes hundreds of thousands of deaths in scandals like OxyContin and Vioxx. Adverse drug reactions also kill over 100,000 Americans annually.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/17) JAMA (1998): Over 100,000 people die every year from adverse drug reactions. Not overdoses. Not mistakes. Just people taking prescription drugs exactly as directed by their “trusted” doctors. By 2014, a Harvard faculty member put the death toll at 128,000 per year.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(21/33) 💵 Systemic Bribery Pharmaceutical companies are consistently among the worst offenders prosecuted under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), paying billions in fines for bribing officials, doctors, and regulators across dozens of countries.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(22/33) 📉 Least Trusted, Most Hated Gallup 2019: Pharma ranked dead last in public trust. Below banks. Below oil. Below the federal government. And that’s with media running interference for them.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(23/33) 🛡️ Legal Immunity You can sue a car company for brake failure. You can sue a toy company for a choking hazard. But you can’t sue a vaccine manufacturer for a deadly product. Pharma enjoys special protections no other industry gets.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccine manufacturers are uniquely protected from design defect claims, unlike manufacturers of other products like planes, cars, and drugs. This immunity was granted in 1986 through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act because manufacturers of the three routine childhood vaccines (MMR, Polio, and DTP) faced excessive liability and potential bankruptcy due to harm caused by their products. Instead of requiring safer products, Congress granted immunity, allowing manufacturers to continue selling vaccines regardless of potential harm. This immunity extended to all future routine childhood vaccines. Consequently, the CDC schedule has expanded from 3 injections in the first year of life in 1986 to 29 today. Pharmaceutical companies developing these vaccines know they won't be liable for injuries. Unlike typical drug trials, vaccine trials often lack placebo controls (except for the COVID-19 vaccine), have short safety review periods (days, weeks, or up to six months), and are underpowered, making it difficult to confirm product safety.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For every product on the market, you can sue the manufacturer for harm, for design defect claims. Meaning, the claim that the product could have made safer. I mean, literally, look around this room. Planes, cars, pharmaceutical drugs, everyone. There's only one product in America. You cannot sue the manufacturer for design defect claim to claim that it it could have been made safer, and that are vaccines. I heard, you know, injections, vaccines. My definition of vaccine is any product for which the government needs to give it immunity from harms. To me, that's what a vaccine is because some infect prevent infections, some don't. That's what a vaccine is, meaning it can't survive without that immunity, apparently. Why did vaccines get this immunity, which was provided in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act? Because leading up to 'eighty six, there were only three routine childhood vaccines, MMORPV and DTP, and they were causing so much harm and causing so much liability that all the manufacturers were going out of business to stop making them. Congress, instead of forcing those manufacturers to do what every other product manufacturer needs to do in that situation, which is what? Make a better, safer product. Instead said, you know what? We're just going to leave you immunity. We're going to make it so nobody can sue you for those harms, and you can keep selling your product to the American public no matter how many children it kills or injures. And the issue is that that immunity was not just given for those three products, it was given for any childhood vaccine, routine child vaccine that was developed thereafter. And and I'm I tell you this not to take issue with childhood vaccines, but to explain to you the regulatory framework in which vaccines have developed over the last forty years. We have now gone from three injections in the first year of life under the CDC schedule in 86 to 29 injections, including in utero, if a child follows the CDC schedule today. Every one of those vaccines, save one, was developed by a pharmaceutical company knowing they would not be responsible for the injuries that are caused by those products. So when you have drug trials where pharmaceutical companies, they care about losing money. They don't want to lose money on their drugs. They often do multi year placebo controlled trials before they get on the market because they don't want to end up upside down. They're there to make money. But with vaccine products, because they don't have that financial incentive, they have the actually, disincentive. Almost every childhood vaccine in this country is licensed based on clinical trials with often with no placebo control, say for COVID nineteen vaccine, often days or weeks up to maybe six months of safety review after injection, and are often extremely underpowered. Those trials could never have really confirmed the safety of this product. And my submission to this committee laid out every single vaccine and put them in detail.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(24/33) Some may try to rationalize their use of pharma products by saying, “Sure, pharma is corrupt—but that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t use their drugs.” That logic might hold for other industries. You can still use oil even if ExxonMobil is corrupt.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(25/33) But pharmaceutical products are different. They require blind trust. When your brakes fail, you notice immediately. But if your child develops seizures months after a vaccine, pharma gets to say “It’s just a coincidence.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(26/33) 👨‍⚕️ “But I Trust My Doctor…” People will give their children dozens of vaccines and take their daily dose of statins and other prescription medication not because they trust the pharmaceutical industry per se, but because they trust their doctor.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(27/33) But they fail to realize their doctor is a hired gun for the pharmaceutical industry.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(28/33) Your doctor doesn’t read the raw data. He doesn’t scrutinize the trials, question the journals, or challenge the regulators. He reads guidelines. He follows protocols. He does what he’s told.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(29/33) What your doctor believes—about disease, drugs, vaccines—comes from a literature pipeline funded, ghostwritten, and corrupted by pharma. Even editors of the world’s top medical journals admit the journals are corrupt and the research is junk.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Insiders admit what your doctor never will: Modern medicine is a fraud — Thread In a sane world, the overwhelming evidence would be enough to convince anyone. But most people don’t care about evidence—they just trust the “experts.” This thread is for them. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(30/33) The entire medical system is downstream from that literature, which is likewise downstream from a totally corrupt industry. Trusting their products isn’t just willful ignorance—it’s profoundly self-destructive, if not outright suicidal.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/43) 🚨⚠️ Medical Journals Are Corrupt and the Research Is Mostly Junk — Thread Most of what your doctor practices is based on fraud. Even top journals are industry mouthpieces, churning out junk to push drugs. Trusting them is like trusting cigarette ads from the '50s. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(31/33) As it would be utter lunacy to trust a convicted, unrepentant pedophile to babysit your kids, it's equally deranged to trust the products of a criminal industry with perverse incentives—or the doctors, media, and regulators that serve as its marketing division.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(32/33) When you buy their drugs, you’re financing organized crime—making you not just a customer, but an accomplice.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(33/33) Read the full article (with more details and sources) on my Substack: https://drwojakmd.substack.com/p/pharma-is-organized-crime 🚨 Follow me there for deeper dives exposing medicine’s biggest lies—and here for more threads like this one.

Pharma Is Organized Crime And 95% of people have cognitive dissonance about it. drwojakmd.substack.com
DrWojakMD
Posted - January 8, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 12:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve created a comprehensive thread explaining why I believe virology is a scam, catering to various attention spans. From brief 10-word summaries to extensive 25,000-word analyses, I’ve included perspectives from multiple contributors, each offering their insights. I emphasize that anyone who reads this should reconsider their beliefs about viruses. I suggest that 2025 will be crucial for exposing this issue further and hint at a potential video version for those who prefer visual content.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span I’ve tailored this thread to all attention spans—from 10-word memes for goldfish brains to 25,000-word papers for chads—and everything in between. Pick length that suits you and see why virology’s a scam. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/28) Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.” 3/28: 20 words 4/28: 30 words @APWK 5/28: 40 words 6/28: 45 words @DrWojakMD 7/28: 50 words @AndrewKaufmanMD 8/28: 50 words @drtomcowan 9/28: 55 words Dr. Mark Bailey 10/28: 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka 11/28: 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka 12/28: 100 words 13/28: 130 words Dr. Jordan Grant 14/28: 140 words 15/28: 200 words 16/28: 250 words 17/28: 300 words 18/28: 300 words 19/28: 500 words @potusastrologer 20/28: 550 words @Alec_Zeck 21/28: 600 words 22/28: 3000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka 23/28: 4000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka 24/28: 5000 words @Alec_Zeck @JacobDiazTheUV Dr. Jordan Grant @MikeDonio @ViroLIEgy 25/28: 14,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey, Dr. John Bevan-Smith 26/28: 21,000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka 27/28: 25,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 20 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 30 words @_APWK_

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 40 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 45 words @DrWojakMD

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 50 words @AndrewKaufmanMD

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 50 words @drtomcowan

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 55 words Dr. Mark Bailey

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 70 words Dr. Stefan Lanka

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(12/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 100 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(13/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 130 words Dr. Jordan Grant

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(14/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 140 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(15/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 200 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(16/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 250 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(17/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 300 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(18/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 300 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(19/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 500 words @potusastrologer Link: https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-prof-denis-rancourt

Open Letter to Prof. Denis Rancourt The Canadian former physics professor says he is assembling a team to investigate the existence of viruses. I offer historical documents that might facilitate his efforts. planetwavesfm.substack.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(20/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 550 words @Alec_Zeck Link: https://aleczeck.substack.com/p/lets-get-to-the-root-there-is-no?s=w

Let's get to the root: There is no proof of SARS-CoV-2 To the freedom-fighting virus pushers: If we don't start addressing the root of the lie, we will be playing this game forever aleczeck.substack.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(21/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 600 words

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(22/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 3000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20221207011455/https://greatreject.org/dr-stefan-lanka-claims-about-viruses-are-false/

Dr. Stefan Lanka: "All claims about viruses as pathogens are false" The true causes of the diseases and phenomena attributed to viruses now have a different explanation, and note one that is much clearer than the current pseudo-explanations. web.archive.org

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(23/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 4000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka Link: https://ourfreesociety.com/viruses/dismantling-the-virus-theory-dr-stefan-lanka.pdf

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(24/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 5000 words @Alec_Zeck @JacobDiazTheUV Dr. Jordan Grant @MikeDonio @ViroLIEgy Link: https://viroliegy.com/2022/07/22/debunking-the-nonsense/

Debunking the Nonsense A few months ago, I was invited by Alec Zeck to help develop and participate in a presentation brilliantly led by him and including many other people whom I greatly admire and respect such as Dr. Jordan Grant, Mike Donio, and Jacob Diaz. We set out to create an easy to understand case against the… viroliegy.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(25/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 14,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey, Dr. John Bevan-Smith Link: https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/THE-COVID-19-FRAUD-WAR-ON-HUMANITY_Live-ToCV3.pdf

Unmasking the Viral Paradigm In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of the Alliance for Human Research Protection sent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary “Never Again is Now Global”. drsambailey.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(26/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 21,000 words Dr. Stefan Lanka Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20250108011720/https://pdfhost.io/v/lCDrTdbZm_The_Virus_Misconcepion_Parts_13_by_Stefan_Lanka

The Virus Misconcepion (Parts 1–3) by Stefan Lanka.pdf | PDF Host PDF Host read free online - The Virus Misconcepion (Parts 1–3) by Stefan Lanka.pdf web.archive.org

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(27/28) ⚠️🦠 Virology is a Sham — Explained in 25,000 words Dr. Mark Bailey Link: https://drsambailey.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/A-FAREWELL-TO-VIROLOGY-Expert-Edition-V1.2.pdf

Unmasking the Viral Paradigm In mid-2024, the legendary Vera Sharav of the Alliance for Human Research Protection sent a request. She asked if my husband Mark and I would write an essay concerning the perversion of science for her companion book to the documentary “Never Again is Now Global”. drsambailey.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(28/28) If you can read, you now have NO EXCUSE for believing in “viruses” after this thread. Maybe I’ll make a video version for the illiterate. 2025 will be a pivotal year for this fraud being exposed. Further reading attached. 🚨 Follow for more threads like this. https://t.co/fr0nztY4ds

DrWojakMD
Posted - January 6, 2025 at 8:21 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread discussing the idea that Covid was a premeditated hoax, highlighting various events leading up to the pandemic. I pointed out the Rockefeller Foundation's 2010 predictions, the foreshadowing in the film "Contagion," and statements from figures like Bill Gates and Fauci that seemed to anticipate a pandemic. I noted the increase in WHO funding and a 2019 simulation by the Gates Foundation. I concluded that Covid was not a surprise but rather a planned event, suggesting that virology itself is a flawed concept.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/19) ⚠️🧵 Covid Was a Premeditated Hoax: A Thread With the next fake pandemic looming, let’s revisit how the last one was premeditated. Here’s a chronological breakdown of the most glaring signs of foreknowledge. Even the most informed will find new info here.👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/19) 2010: 10 years before Covid, The Rockefeller Foundation’s ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology’ outlines ‘Lock Step,’ where a pandemic leads to: - total government control - authoritarian leadership - lasting restrictions More blueprint than “hypothetical scenario.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/19) 2011 film Contagion foreshadows Covid: - virus from bats in Asia, spread via wet markets - viral videos alert the West - CDC & WHO lead, locals sidelined - independent media dismissed - social distancing, vax passports Classic predictive programming. More examples later.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many have noted the similarities between the 2011 film Contagion and the current pandemic. In Contagion, the virus is a coronavirus originating from bats in Asia and spreading through wet markets, much like we were initially told about COVID-19. The West becomes aware through viral videos from Asia spread via alternative media. The CDC, WHO, and other centralized authorities manage the response, sidelining local authorities. Independent media is dismissed as conspiracy theorists. The film references the CDC's overreaction to H1N1, justifying it as erring on the side of caution. A miracle cure, like forsythia or hydroxychloroquine, is promoted prematurely. Social distancing, a term now common, is emphasized. When an independent journalist points out the financial ties between those handling the pandemic and vaccine manufacturers, they're portrayed negatively. Ultimately, a vaccine developed collaboratively heals the world, and vaccination passports allow people to return to public life.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People have been pointing out a lot of the similarities between the 02/2011 film Contagion and the current pandemic that we're all being told about, spreading across the world and keeping many of us captives in our own homes. The similarities are striking. The virus in Contagion is a coronavirus. And as we were first told about COVID nineteen, the fictional virus in Contagion comes from bats in Asia. It's also spread in wet markets. The West First becomes aware of the spread through viral videos coming out of Asia that are spread throughout the alternative media. The response to the virus is handled by the CDC and the WHO and other centralized authorities that supersede all the local authorities who are depicted as idiots that can't possibly understand the seriousness of the situation. Independent media is derided as not real journalism, but as crackpot conspiracy theorists. The film mentions the CDC's overreaction to h one n one and explains it away as better safe than sorry, and people suggesting otherwise are just being shortsighted and probably want your grandma to die. There's also a mysterious miracle cure that's being touted and promoted before any research has been conducted. This is forsythia. Hydroxychloroquine. They talk about social distancing, a term that no one had heard in 02/2011 and a term that everyone is painfully familiar with today. Right now, our best defense has been social distancing. Speaker 1: We start tonight with the coronavirus pandemic. The White House task force warns people not to violate social distancing guidelines because if they do, it could spark a second wave of sickness. Speaker 0: When the independent media journalist points out that the same people handling the pandemic are the same people that stand again financially from a vaccine. On your blog, you also wrote that the World Health Organization is somehow in bed with pharmaceutical companies. Because they are. That's who stands to gain from this. They're working hand in glove. He's depicted as a lunatic. In the end, of course, the world is healed by the vaccine developed by the Jewish doctor with the help of his black friend at the CDC and the selfless white woman who tests the vaccine on herself. And once the vaccine is administered, people are given a vaccination passport that allows them to go out into public. These are striking similarities.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/19) 2015: 5 years before Covid, Peter Daszak, head of EcoHealth Alliance, which funneled NIAID funds to Wuhan, says, “We need to increase public understanding of medical countermeasures like a pan-coronavirus vaccine… Investors will follow the profit.” @DrDMartinWorld great work exposing the origins of these "vaccines" deserves its own thread.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, Bill Gates predicts a highly infectious virus will kill over 10 million people. Funny how he accurately “predicted” the Covid death toll, despite the entire thing being a hoax, with excess deaths mostly due to vaccines and pandemic protocols.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Growing up, nuclear war was the big fear. Now, a global catastrophe is more likely to be a highly infectious virus. An epidemic, whether natural or intentional, is the most probable cause of over ten million deaths in the coming decades. The lack of preparedness is alarming. We should be running simulations, like germ games instead of war games, to identify vulnerabilities. Starting now allows us to be ready for the next epidemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I was a kid, the disaster we worried about most was a nuclear war. Today, the greatest risk of global catastrophe doesn't look like this. Instead, it looks like this. If anything kills over ten million people in the next few decades, it's most likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. I think, an epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, ten million excess deaths. We're not ready for the next epidemic. We need to do simulations, germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. We need to do simulations, germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. If we start now, we can be ready for the next epidemic. Thank you. I think an epidemic, either naturally caused or intentionally caused, is the most likely thing to cause, say, ten million excess deaths, and that it's pretty surprising how little preparedness there is for it.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, Fauci asserts there will be a “surprise” pandemic under the new Trump administration. Seems less like a “surprise” when he sounds so certain, doesn’t it? Fauci’s central role in the AIDS hoax of the 80s made him the ideal front man for Covid.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the next administration will definitely face challenges related to infectious diseases. This includes managing existing chronic infectious diseases, which already pose a significant burden. However, more importantly, be prepared for a surprise outbreak. It's not a matter of if, but when, so pandemic preparedness is crucial.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There will be a surprise outbreak. It's the issue of pandemic, preparedness. And if there's one message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/19) 2017: 3 years before Covid, SPARS Pandemic scenario is created by Johns Hopkins & the Gates Foundation to prepare for a future pandemic. These are the same people who hosted a coronavirus pandemic simulation (Event 201) just a couple months before Covid.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/19) 2018-19: 1 year before Covid, the WHO’s budget conveniently saw a significant increase for “outbreak and crisis response”.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/19) Jan 2019: 11 months before Covid, a virologist at Chatham House trains leaders on using fear and inflated death numbers to control the public and promote vaccines during a pandemic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As the flu commissioner for Belgium, appointed in 2006, my role was an unpaid endeavor that became critical during the 2009 pandemic. On day one, transparency and a unified message are key. Being a non-politician helped avoid political attacks and allowed me to navigate challenges more effectively. We branded the virus as the "Mexican flu," which, while controversial, improved public recognition. Media relationships were crucial, enabling comprehensive coverage and leveraging free airtime through collaborative efforts with TV anchors. Predicting future scenarios was important for managing public anxiety and shaping appropriate media coverage. Our calm, cool, and collected approach was designed to reassure the public while preparing for the worst. Maintaining public trust meant addressing questions promptly, even attending funerals to show empathy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much, Harp. Thanks for the invitation. And I was asked to to tell you about my experiences being the crisis manager, the flu commissioner for Belgium and highlighting the communication aspects there. These are some of my conflicts of interest over the past twenty years, I guess. It all started for me at that time, well, actually in 02/2006 when I was appointed. This is an unpaid hobby, so it's not a profession or a function, whatever. It's it's really a hobby that that flu commissioner thing. On 04/24/2009, that was when WHO said, okay, there will be a pandemic and that's when the the thing started. And then you have one opportunity to do it right. I mean, one is so important. In day one, you start your communication with the press, with the people and you have to do it right. I mean, you have to go for one voice, one message. In Belgium, they chose to appoint a non politician to do that. I mean, I have no party affiliations and that makes things a little bit, at that time at least, a little bit easier because you're not you're not attacked politically, majority minority, that doesn't come into play and that was a huge advantage. The second advantage is that you can play in Brussels the complete naive guy and get a lot more done than you would otherwise be be able to do. So one voice, one message, that's the tone that you set on day one, and you have to be you have to be very transparent in that. My name is the Intermissary Commissary for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Planning. That, of course, is too long. That became the flu commissary, and that was and that was a lot a lot easier. You have to be omnipresent that first day or the first days. So that you attract the media attention, you you make an agreement with them that you will tell them all, and if they call, you will pick up the phone. When you do that, then you can profit from these early days to get complete corporate coverage of the field, and they're not going to search for alternative voices there. And if you do that, that makes things a lot easier. And then you convey the message, and you can do that if you do it that way, that our country is ready for a pandemic. That is a gross overestimation for sure, but it is crucial to, well, to go into that pandemic. First of all, what's in the name if you talk about the pandemic? It's quite important. People are talking about the swine flu, the pandemic h one and one zero nine virus, novel influenza, two thousand and nine, a h one and one flu. At some point, was called the North American influenza, the novel flu virus. That was way too difficult. So we called it the Mexican flu. Yeah. That got me into huge trouble with the with the ambassador of Mexico at that time, and she was she was furious. Afterwards, we became good friends. I still get invited to their to their New Year's reception every year. But people were making fun of it, and and okay, that's that's probably unavoidable. But the fact to have a a clear and recognizable name, was easy for the lay public to understand and use was was actually quite important. It also worked. This is the word of the year of 02/2009. Defriending on Facebook became number one. To my big disappointment, Mexican flu was second and flu commissary was was number six. So the term works, and that makes things a lot a lot easier. These first weeks, that's easy street. When you have no opposition and and everybody needs news and they can come to you for news, you can bring quite a lot of neutral information and it is picked up and it is well, the news is brought the way you bring it and that is you can only do that in the first couple of weeks or months. One of the problems that we have or that we had is that we did not have a media budget. That was really €0 that we could spend. That means that you have to use every opportunity you can get to, well, not Britannia rules the waves, but rule the airwaves to to bring out your your message. And that's what that's something that you can do for free on radio, on TV. If you have good preexisting relationships with the media, we you can try something else. We tried the the following thing. We asked all of the anchors of the different TV stations, are you willing for free to participate in a sort of infomercial that you would pay for all of you? And they said, yes. We'll we'll we'll do that. And and that was hugely influential and and, well, we would never be able nobody would ever be able to pay for something like this. But if you have pretty good pre existing relationships with them, then then you can you can ask for return favor and they will or they might do that. One of the things that we tried, but it's ten years ago, was using Facebook and and Twitter, but well, there were not enough people on Facebook and Twitter at that time to really have an impact. If we would do that now, that would be a prime channel to communicate. However, that works both ways. I mean, also the fake news would be transmitted much more readily through Facebook, through Twitter than than it did ten ten years ago. Answering the question of the day, no matter what the the journalist's question is, is quite important. So we had a call center which was gradually becoming more and more populated. And every almost hour to hour, and later day to day, you have to get an idea what are the questions that the people are asking. And and every day, these questions were delivered multiple times so that I could work them in into the interviews no matter what the question was. The first questions, that was the first peak, and that peak was about 900 calls per day at the the moment, at the per week at the the first peak. The first questions were travel related. Can I still go to Mexico? I have planned a vacation. Can I get my money back? If you solve that problem by declaring an emergency, you help quite a lot of people and that first peak goes goes away. And then you have to predict the future. That's hard because the future has not happened yet. Predicting the past is a lot easier, but you have to predict the future in order to to prepare the public and not have an over and over exaggeration or an exaggeration of the the information in the press. So I said, Belgium, small country, we will also have h one and one cases. When you bring that, it is front page news. When then, a couple of days later, the first h one one one case arrives in the country, is the second time that they have to bring that news. So they bring it in a more muted and I think appropriate way. You can only do that when you prepare the scene for that. That was the second wave of questions people were asking more questions about what do I do when I get sick and so on, and that gives you the opportunity to work with them. And then you have to say, okay, well, we will have H one and one deaths. Of course, that would be unavoidable. I used there, sir Donaldson's quote where he said that in UK, by the peak of the epidemic, forty people would die per day at the end of the summer. So sixty two at that time million people in UK, Forty deaths a day. I worked it out for Belgium. That would be seven deaths a day at the peak of the epidemic. I used that in the media. Seven Belgian flu deaths per per day at the peak of the epidemic would be realistic. That is true in every year, even in per pandemicly. That that is very, very conservative. However, talking about fatalities is important because when you say that, people say, wow. What do you mean? People die because of influenza? And that was a necessary step to take. And then of course, a couple of days later, you had the first h one and one death in the country and the scene was set and it was already talked about. That was the third peak of of questions where that were well, the first that it had an impact and you have to have to deal with that. I went to the first couple of funerals. You have to be very quiet, sit in the back, but but it it it shows that you care and and I think that was at that time quite important. So all in all, at that time, the overall feeling in the population in the press was the Belgian approach is is reasonable. In fact, we wanted to be calm, cool and collected and our mantra was, and that was from day one at this moment, it is comparable more or less to seasonal influenza in terms of outcome, but we have to prepare for severe scenarios. Like in 1918, the first wave was rather mild and you could not predict that the second wave would have a would carry high mortality. We focus on low cost basic hygiene measures. We did not do any school closures. We used antivirals for high risk groups. Actually, we used antivirals in the beginning for people who were ill. I had pre positioned cars in the different provinces and they would drive antivirals to patients when they would be diagnosed by influenza in order to delay the onset of the epidemic and that worked until the the end of the of the school year. We only purchased one dose of vaccine per person and the the vaccination plan would be to vaccinate more or less the same high risk groups as for seasonal influenza. And then the vacation came. And that is communication wise a very dangerous period. It's a dangerous period because the more untrained journalists are at the helm, yeah, and you get the weirdest questions. They're understaffed, so more articles from other countries will come in and contaminate your message, and and that that was a weird period. That was pictures that my father took from the holiday with the grand children and I was not I was not the most social guy, I I must admit. And and my son was born two weeks before the pandemic struck, so that was not good timing. And then comes the time, inevitably, that they they they're going to talk about you. The flu commissioner is a really a great guy. And then you then you get the feel good articles about, yeah, what does he like, what music does he like, Pictures from my first laboratory when I was 13 years old. And it's all feel good, but when they do that, they also sharpen the axis at the at the same time. And then then your your personal life your your personal life becomes a little bit compromised, and and so then they come to your home and you have to really limit that because if you do not limit that, then then you have no life. And then comes then everything is set about the pandemic, about you, and then the the search for controversy. A certain point in time, had a controversy about the the payment of the physicians for the mass vaccination that would happen in in a couple of months or a couple of weeks later. And then the the quote that I gave them in terms of how much money they would receive, that was far too low and I had to be fired. You can solve that quite easily. I said, okay, you want me to be fired. I would like to win the lottery. The odds of both of these things are happening are are fairly slim and that and that passed. And then you come to the the the phase where they're going to be much more critical. And the first one was the government does not do enough. The h one and one vaccine will arrive too late and there will not be enough vaccine. Get it while you can. That was the that was the first the first really atmosphere that was created. So not enough vaccine, get it while you can. So at that point, I had to say, okay, I will be the last one to be vaccinated. I mean, you can all go in before me. I'll I'll be I'll be the last one and and that later on I regretted that that message. That vaccination campaign got a huge number of questions. That was actually the the crux of the of the campaign was the the vaccination campaign and many people had had questions there. So you had to show them that you had I mean, if if the the stockpiles, you had to walk there and walk in the in the rooms where the where you could show them that we have the vaccines and they are they are already in the country. A lot of a lot of reassurance was necessary there. And then you had to pick who is going to be vaccinated first. And then, well, women and children first, whatever. I mean, risk groups, they were important. And then I misused the fact that the top top football soccer clubs in Belgium inappropriately and against all agreements vaccinated their they made their soccer players priority people. So I said, I can use that. Because if the the population really believes that this this vaccine is so desirable that even the soccer players would be dishonest to get their vaccine, I I said, okay, I can I can play with that? So I made a big fuzz about this. This is Van Rance. He's he's raving mad. But but it worked. And and actually, these vaccination campaigns by the GPs went really, really well in a number of weeks everybody could be could be vaccinated. That's still a fairly relevant portion of the panel. Well, it it worked fine in Flanders. So you know Belgium, it's a complicated country. And and this is the the vaccination coverage. And you could see Flanders did really well. I did as many interviews in French than than in Dutch. However, in in the Flemish part of the country, we listen to the Flemish media. In the French speaking part of the country, they equally often listen to the or watch the French television where all kind of other messages were were coming across and that was really polluting the the vaccination campaign in. And then, of course, people say, okay, the vaccine is unsafe and then you get the swine flu hoax and the vaccine could kill you, say no to the vaccine that atmosphere starts. And then after the crisis, everybody becomes smart. Yeah. And you you have to accept that from the from the get go. And then the overall statement was, no, well, the government did too much, of course, because the number of deaths were disappointing to some people. And then all the books are written and everybody uses all the data and forgets that you had to take the decisions based on a fragment of the data that were available or that would be available later on. And then it was turned into a scam. People were really making money out of it. And and I think the the the Council of Europe played a a very bad role in this. This is Wolfgang Wodark, and I want to shame him actually because he, in the Council of Europe, had a motion for a recommendation, fake pandemics, a threat for health. They basically said that all these all these virologists, vaccinologists, they all have money in their pockets. They're they're dishonest people. That's easy to say. This is when you Google for h one and one. Of course, there was a peak in October and November. You didn't hear Wodark at that time. When you Google Wodark, you see that it starts nicely after the end of the pandemic. People become very brave at the end of the pandemic. I think that's not good. Then as time goes by, I still have one minute and fifty one seconds, I would like to actually issue a warning. This all started in, well, April 2009. Many years have passed. In fact, three thousand five hundred and sixty days today, five zero eight weeks and almost ten years have passed. And that has an impact because people are forgetting about the pandemics a little bit. This is when you look for influenza and pandemic in PubMed. Until 02/2003, '2 thousand and '4, there wasn't much. Then H5N1 came and some interest was raised. Then the the two thousand and nine pandemic arrived, then there was a lot of interest, and that is what happened since. So the interest is scientifically is is going down. Also, the leadership is changing, and this was a good exercise for a big pandemic. I agree. But when we're moving farther away from 02/2009, that experience is being lost. At that time, Margaret Chen, the TWH show, Tom Frieden CDC, Susan Jacob, the e CDC. Well, we're now one or two directors further and that experience from 02/2009, of course, been other experiences, but that one is not there anymore. The same for the leadership, the political leadership. At that time, Obama, Brown, Sarkozy in Belgium, Von Rampoye were there, and well, we're two or three political leaders further down the road, and and a lot of what was learned in 02/1999 has been sort of unlearned and and would have to be invented all. Well, there is still Angela Merkel and Apostrophe. They're the they're the mainstays. We can always count on them. So are we ready for the next pandemic? I don't think we are. But I would say that pandemics are like a box of chocolates. And then I would like to invoke the words of the philosopher, Forrest Gump, you never know what you're going to get. Yes. Thank you. Speaker 1: Okay, Mark. Thank you very much. Any comments or questions? Yes. Speaker 2: Hi. Thank you very much. Kieran Boltsherman. I'm clinical director at the British Medical Journal. I suppose what's changed since 02/2009? We live in an era of fake news and social media. How will we get the messages across today? Speaker 0: It is scary. And I I I'm I'm really afraid of that because that was not around in 02/2009. People would still respect authority that you got by by learning something or by professional experience. That is gone. Everybody has graduated from the University of Google, and respect for for knowledge is is gone because why would you need knowledge when you can create knowledge by typing a couple of keywords in Google and getting it yourself. That is extremely dangerous. Also, the the level of politicians that we have. I mean I mean, when I show these pictures, except for maybe some exceptions, you might want them back. It it is different. When I look at The US and also Italy, the anti vaccination sentiments there, they're growing and they're growing also at the political level that is very unsettling. Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay. Any other questions? Yes. Shout. Already have Speaker 3: my permission at SHOW. So what about engaging the social that the influences of of this day, like the entertainment industry? Speaker 0: That has been tried to a certain extent also in 02/2009. I mean, you saw Barack Obama being vaccinated. We do that every year in the hospital. In the hospital, the director and the vice director in their underwear are vaccinated. That that has a huge impact. So influencers are are important. But you you well, you need to ride influencers. I mean the Speaker 3: The wrong ones like the Kardashians. Speaker 0: I I Well, if if they do the right things, they might not be the wrong ones. But but I I think they become unpredictable. They come they become unpredictable, I think. Speaker 3: How fast is the Emmy's? With? The Emmy's. Speaker 0: The Emmy Awards. Speaker 3: We gave a flu shot. Speaker 0: That was not necessary. I think they meant well. I don't think the Emmy Awards ceremony necessarily is the setting to do vaccinations, but I think they meant well. I saw the footage. Speaker 1: Other questions? Speaker 4: Yes. Caroline Brown, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Mark, I really like your presentation and I've seen it before and it's still entertaining. Speaker 1: It's probably entertaining the first time. Okay. No, Speaker 4: it's still. So Belgium called it the Mexican flu, as did many countries. It's it's a good name, but certainly from WHO perspective, we we try to avoid implicating the countries. And I think that's part of preparedness. Let's be prepared for the next pandemic. What are we gonna call it that we could all call it? Speaker 0: Well, we talk we still talk about the Spanish flu, the Hong Kong flu, the Asian flu, and I've never felt that that was extremely discriminating against, for example, the Spanish people. I I agree and I understand it, but the the different names that were used were they're okay to use in scientific journals, that is fine. But to use that in communication with the public, it was over their head. When you talk about age one and one, then you lose 90% of the audience. Speaker 4: I understand, but I can assure you that our Spanish colleagues are still sensitive about nineteen eighteen. Speaker 1: It's not the WHO that determines the name. Speaker 0: True. But I I I do understand the sensitivities. Speaker 2: But do Speaker 3: you think people understand h one n one now? Speaker 0: Well, a lot more people do than than a couple of years ago, but never overestimate that really. I mean, it is over their heads. Speaker 1: But h one zero one is seasonal today, so the Spanish flu is not seasonal, so Yeah. Speaker 0: To a certain extent. Speaker 5: So you have mentioned your experience with Belgium. Do you believe similar experiences have been in other European or even non European countries? Speaker 0: I think it might be well, in Belgium this was possible, not because it's a great country, but it's a small country. If you want to do this, one voice, one message in a a huge country, it is very difficult to achieve, I think. I think it's more important or what what worked more was the fact that that was apolitical. I I think that had more of an influence. If you do if you have a career politician do that, from day one, he gets attacked by the opposition whose duty it is to oppose. But that it makes life very hard I think for them. Speaker 1: Perhaps if you compare it to The Netherlands, which is quite similar, we had about 20 spokespeople. Yeah. And so that made it very difficult. Yeah. So I'm coming Speaker 5: from Italy. Don't remember what happened in Italy. Honestly, it was ten years ago. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you very much, Mark.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/19) Aug 2019: 6 months before Covid, the Australian Government publishes a 230-page influenza pandemic plan.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/19) 5 Sep 2019: 4 months before Covid, a 4chan anon blows the whistle and reveals EXACTLY what would unfold, matching Bill Gates’s earlier prediction of 9-10 million deaths. “Do not accept any vaccines for a deadly virus in winter 2020.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(12/19) Sep 2019: 4 months before Covid, the Global Vaccination Summit calls for “strong surveillance systems” to ensure global injections. 6 days later, the WHO warns of a “rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen.”

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(13/19) 24 Sep 2019: 3 months before Covid, Trump’s Executive Order 13887 pushes for expanding rapid vaccine production.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(14/19) 18 Oct 2019: 2 months before Covid, Bill Gates Foundation hosts a coronavirus pandemic simulation: Event 201. Deep state criminals love to do “simulations” of their psyops before the real thing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're here to simulate a multi-stakeholder Pandemic Emergency Board meeting as a severe pandemic emerges. Global collaboration between business and governments is critical. There are conspiracy theories circulating, so we need to address bad actors spreading fake news and bring them to justice. This new coronavirus causes respiratory illness, and demand for protective equipment is rising, overwhelming healthcare. Despite concerns, 65% are eager for a vaccine, though its timely arrival is uncertain. Penalties, including arrest, are in place for spreading falsehoods, and controlling information access might be necessary. We must balance saving lives with avoiding an economic collapse. The pandemic has led to protests, riots, violent crackdowns, martial law, and a loss of public trust. The economic and societal impacts, including distrust of news and breakdown of social cohesion, could last for years.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On behalf of our center and our partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, I'd like to extend a very warm welcome to our audience here in New York, as well as our larger virtual audience participating online today. The event two zero one scenario is fictional. Today's scenario is going to simulate meetings of a multi stakeholder group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. Speaker 1: We're at the start of what's looking like it will be a severe pandemic, and there are problems emerging that can only be solved by global business and governments working together. Speaker 0: There has been some conspiracy theories that are around about the potential that pharmaceutical companies or the UN have released this for their own benefit. Speaker 2: And maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news. Speaker 3: A new coronavirus. Infected Speaker 0: people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs to severe pneumonia. In related news, a significant demand for personal protective equipment like N95 masks and gloves are on the rise. Patients are overwhelming healthcare facilities. People are avoiding public spaces out of fear of infection and in compliance with public health recommendations. Our US affiliate has just released polling results on public expectations for a vaccine, and sixty five percent of those polled are eager to take the vaccine, even if it's experimental. Speaker 4: I'm not optimistic about having the vaccine in time to be relevant during this pandemic. Speaker 0: With enough money and political will, anything is possible. Speaker 3: Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrest. Speaker 5: If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it's the right choice. Speaker 6: What exactly are the risks and benefits of staying home from work? Absolutely, we need to save lives, but we literally cannot afford a heavy handed response that suffocates our economy. Speaker 3: The world saw large scale protests and in some places riots. This led to violent crackdowns in some countries and even martial law. The public lost trust in their respective administration. Economists say the economic turmoil caused by such a pandemic will last for years. The societal impacts, the loss of faith in government, the distrust of news, and the breakdown of social cohesion could last even longer.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Event 201 was a simulation exercise that occurred right before the COVID-19 lockdowns. It was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the same group that accurately predicted the 2001 anthrax attacks with a similar simulation beforehand. Event 201 involved actors who greatly benefited from COVID-19 policies. Avril Haines, a long-time consultant for Palantir and former CIA Deputy Director under Obama, was directly involved in the simulation. Haines, who is now the Director of National Intelligence, essentially the CIA's boss in the Biden administration, attempted to remove her connection to Palantir from her online biographies when she joined the Biden campaign.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If people don't know what event two zero one was, they did a mock they pretended they were doing a mock. Hey. What would happen if a if a a a virus got out, and how do we handle it? They did that, like, five seconds before we had to go into lockdowns for coronavirus. And who who's they that did that? Tell people who the they is. Speaker 1: Right. So event two zero one was hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center, for Health Security, which previously the people that ran that and the which included one of the moderators for event two zero one or the people that did the simulation before the two thousand one anthrax attacks that directly predicted what would happen just several months later when the anthrax attacks did happen. And, obviously, the anthrax attacks were intended to go much farther until but a lot of their plans for utilizing the aftermath of the anthrax attacks sort of things didn't go according to plan, basically, when it got traced back to the US military, Speaker 0: that the Speaker 1: anthrax was from the US military. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So event two zero one was a simulation very much like that involving a lot of actors that benefited hugely from COVID nineteen policies. And one of the it's not a Peter Thiel connection, but it is a Palantir connection. So one of the longest running consultants for Palantir is a woman named Avril Haines, who was a CIA deputy director under Obama serving under John Brennan. And Afrohaines was one of, you know, these people involved directly in the event two zero one simulation. Speaker 0: And she's a Speaker 1: palace. Biden is the top intelligence official in his administration, so the director of national intelligence. So, basically, the CIA's boss is her. Speaker 0: And so who and how what's her connection to Palantir? Speaker 1: She's a longtime consultant for them. But as soon as she joined the Biden campaign, she tried to delete it from her biographies online.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(15/19) 29 Oct 2019: 2 months before Covid, Fauci & HHS officials discuss the need for a “global event” to “disrupt the system” and make the public more willing to accept an experimental mRNA shot. C’mon guys don’t make it too obvious.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We can't just shut down our current vaccine system and immediately switch everyone to a new, untested vaccine. To move beyond traditional egg-based vaccine production, which has served us well, we need a demonstrably superior alternative. This requires extensive clinical trials, potentially taking a decade even under ideal circumstances. Perhaps we need a disruptive entity, free from bureaucratic constraints. It’s difficult to alter perceptions of influenza unless we address the problem disruptively and iteratively from within. Imagine if a novel avian virus emerged in China, we could obtain its RNA sequence and transmit it to regional or even local centers, possibly even directly to homes, to print vaccines on patches for self-administration.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine. We haven't given to anyone yet. But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in 1947. Speaker 1: In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be beneficial, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works, and then you've gotta go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is gonna be good over a period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, is gonna take a decade. Speaker 2: There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity Right. Of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes. Speaker 1: So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because you do need both. Speaker 2: But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self administer.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(16/19) Google Trends: A notable spike in “anti-vax” and “anti-vaxxer” mentions right before Covid. Coincidence, or were we being primed by the media?

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(17/19) Covid wasn’t a surprise—it was a premeditated hoax. Virology's a sham. Viruses don’t exist. The particles virologists point to are just cell debris—not disease-causing. PCR tests are nonsense. Contagion is a myth. 2025 will be a big year for people waking up to this.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(18/19) Other notable examples of predictive programming: - 2012 London Olympics opening - 2016 X-Files episode - 2017 Nature article on Wuhan lab Let me know what I’ve missed.👇 Follow for more threads like this.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are claims that everyone has a piece of foreign DNA in their genome, which begs the question of who put it there. This tampering can shut down our immune systems. It's a widespread failure through gene tampering, a virus within a virus from the smallpox vaccine called the Spartan virus, which removes the adenosine deaminase gene using CRISPR Cas9. This is a weapon to depopulate the planet. Our own government lies as a matter of policy, hoarding technology, driven by corporate greed and a darker objective: the takeover of America and the world. They use weather wars, aerial contaminants, and electromagnetic waves to distract and enslave citizens. The government collects your data, preparing to use it against you, and the final takeover will begin with banks going offline, followed by EMP bombs, seemingly an attack by terrorists or Russia, but it's really an invasion of the US.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tad O'Malley has been making claims. Speaker 1: Claims about what? Speaker 0: You and everyone you know has a piece of DNA in your genome, put there without your knowing it. But by whom? Well, that's the question of the day. This is an Internet lunatic. You're not saying you believe him. Speaker 1: Hold on, agent Einstein. You're talking to a scientist. Speaker 0: Forgive me, assistant director. It may sound insensitive, but the suggestion is pure science fiction. What I'm saying, agent Einstein, is that the facts as I understand them cannot be discounted out of hand. No one has the right or the ability to tamper with your DNA. Unless we gave them that ability. When you say they're tampering with our DNA, that they're able to shut down our immune systems by the addition of something to our DNA. Yes. But I don't know how exactly. Or how it's being triggered. I don't know that either. Or why it's happening now. What can we possibly do? We need to act quickly. You were right about that. Speaker 1: Well, Speaker 0: I was wrong about the science. I was wrong about what's causing it. Dead wrong, in fact. But it's clearly a widespread failure of our immune systems. Through gene tampering. A virus within a virus that was put there through the smallpox vaccine is what these men are calling the Spartan virus. We have to figure this out. What's wrong with the science? Okay. The Spartan virus removes the adenosine deaminase gene from your DNA. It removes the ADA gene, and your immune system will simply vanish. Yeah. But I'm not getting sick. It's only a matter of time. Okay? So how does it work? How does the virus remove the ADA gene? A process called CRISPR Cas nine. RNA and a protein cutting genes at exact locations. Exactly. But in this instance, used as a weapon. The ultimate weapon, the ability to depopulate the planet, to kill everyone but the chosen by tampering with their DNA. Speaker 1: Through gene editing. Speaker 0: Why do such a thing and lie about it? Own government. Speaker 1: Your own government lies a matter of course, a matter of policy. The Tuskegee experiments on black men in the thirties, Henrietta Lacks. Speaker 0: What are they trying to do? Speaker 2: That's the missing piece. But it's not hard to imagine. A government hiding, hoarding technology for seventy years at the expense of human life and the future of the planet. Driven not only by corporate greed, but a darker objective. The takeover of America. And then the world itself by any means necessary, however violent or cruel or efficient by severe drought brought on by weather wars conducted secretly using aerial contaminants and high altitude electromagnetic waves in a state of perpetual war to create problem reaction solution scenarios to distract, enrage, and enslave American citizens at home with tools like the Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Authorization Act, which abridge the constitution in the name of national security. The militarization of police forces in cities across The US, the building of prison camps by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with no stated purpose, the corporate takeover of food and agriculture, important a important The Speaker 0: your phone, collects your data, and monitors your whereabouts with impunity. Speaker 2: A government preparing to use that data against you when it strikes, and the final takeover begins. By a well oiled and well armed multinational group of elites that will cull, kill, and subjugate. Speaker 0: Happening as we sit here. Speaker 2: It's happening all around us. Speaker 1: The other shoe waiting to drop. Speaker 2: It'll probably start on a Friday. The banks will announce a security action necessitating their computers to go offline all weekend. Digital money will disappear. Speaker 0: They can just steal your money? Speaker 1: Followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs to knock out major grids. Speaker 2: What will seem like an attack on America by terrorists or Russia. Speaker 0: An invasion of The US. Speaker 1: The Russians tried it in '47.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(19/19) Links to sources: - 2/19: https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf - 4/19: https://www.unz.com/proberts/how-the-covid-pandemic-was-orchestrated/ - 5/19: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDxb21qIilM - 6/19: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNXGAxGJgQI - 7/19: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/spars-pandemic-scenario-copy.pdf - 8/19: https://www.who.int/about/accountability/results/2018-2019 - 9/19: https://vimeo.com/320913130 - 10/19: https://stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/australia-pandemic-plan.PDF - 11/19: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/225497848/#225498529 - 12/19: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2019-11/ev_20190912_mi_en_0.pdf - 12/19: https://www.gpmb.org/reports/m/item/2019-a-world-at-risk - 13/19: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13887-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-the-united-states-promote-national - 14/19: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise - 15/19: https://www.c-span.org/program/public-affairs-event/universal-flu-vaccine/535344 - 18/19: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2017.21487

How the Covid “Pandemic” Was Orchestrated Everything you should know about Covid unz.com
WHO Results Report 2018-2019 - Driving impact in every country WHO Results Report 2018-2019. 18 May 2020. This report lays out the vital work that we do, and shows how, even as we are responding to one public health event or crisis, we are also working to support countries in meeting the health needs of their populations, strengthening their systems, and planning for the unexpected. This report demonstrates that accountability is at the heart of all that we do. who.int
Communication and public engagement - MARC VAN RANST - 9 Lecture by Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, at the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference on 22 January 2019 vimeo.com
Page not found - Stop World Control stopworldcontrol.com
A World at Risk GPMB 2019 Annual Report gpmb.org
Executive Order 13887—Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States To Promote National Security and Public Health | The American Presidency Project presidency.ucsb.edu
Event 201 | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. centerforhealthsecurity.org
Inside the Chinese lab poised to study world's most dangerous pathogens - Nature Maximum-security biolab is part of plan to build network of BSL-4 facilities across China. nature.com

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

⚠️For anyone raising an eyebrow at the claim of virology being a sham, see the thread linked below. 🦠 https://t.co/iEqIDqO7gx

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Virology is a Sham — Explained for Every Attention Span I’ve tailored this thread to all attention spans—from 10-word memes for goldfish brains to 25,000-word papers for chads—and everything in between. Pick length that suits you and see why virology’s a scam. 🧵👇

DrWojakMD
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve shared insights on what I call the Disease Rebranding Scam, where the perceived success of vaccines is largely a matter of redefinition rather than actual eradication of diseases. Diseases like smallpox, polio, and measles were not eliminated but simply renamed or reclassified. Symptoms that don’t fit new criteria are ignored, and historical epidemics are relabeled with modern terms. This linguistic shift creates an illusion of progress, while the same illnesses persist under different names. The narrative surrounding vaccines is built on these word games, not scientific truth.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/11) 🚨⚠️ The Disease Rebranding Scam: Faking Vaccine Success — A Thread Less than 1% of people understand this. The perception of progress in medicine is largely linguistic fraud, not real advancement. Read on for the most important medical insight of your life. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/11) Vaccines didn’t eradicate diseases. They just changed the names. Smallpox, polio, measles, and other so-called “vanished” diseases never really disappeared. They were simply redefined to create the illusion of vaccine success.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/11) Diseases "eradicated" by vaccines? Reclassified under new names. Symptoms that don’t fit the new narrative? Removed from the criteria. New diseases “discovered” that look just like the old ones? Circling the hamster wheel, faking progress.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/11) Polio’s Vanishing Act Before the vaccine, temporary muscle weakness sufficed for a polio diagnosis. Afterward, only cases with paralysis lasting 60+ days counted. Those cases were relabeled as viral/aseptic meningitis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré, and more.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/11) Smallpox Bait-and-Switch Historical smallpox included cases with mild rashes. Today, monkeypox, generalized vaccinia, cowpox, chickenpox, and other pox-like illnesses fit old smallpox descriptions. Smallpox didn’t vanish. It was renamed.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/11) Measles vs Scarlet Fever vs Rubella In the 1800s, measles, rubella, and scarlet fever were diagnosed interchangeably. Today? Measles supposedly “eliminated” in USA in 2000, while rubella and scarlet fever remain under different classifications. Same symptoms, new names.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(7/11) Typhoid, Cholera, and the “Lost” Epidemics Typhoid, cholera, and other historic plagues were just severe diarrhea, dehydration, and fever—now called gastroenteritis, food poisoning, rotavirus, norovirus, etc. The diseases didn’t vanish. The labels changed.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/11) The Diagnostic Shell Game Vaccines do nothing to eliminate disease, but each “eradicated” disease lives on under a new name. Textbooks are rewritten to erase the old definitions, ensuring new doctors never see the switch. It’s not medicine. It’s linguistic fraud.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/11) Why This Matters If people knew diseases weren’t eradicated, just renamed, they’d see: - vaccine narrative is built on word games, not science; - medical industry survives by controlling definitions, not curing disease; - people still get the same illnesses, just renamed.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(10/11) Doctors and the media love to say, “We eliminated polio, smallpox, and measles.” They didn’t eliminate anything. They just changed the way they count. The reality is far different than the story they sell.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(11/11) This thread only scratches the surface—this rabbit hole goes so much deeper. Follow for deeper dives in future threads. You don’t hate the medical establishment anywhere near enough.

DrWojakMD
Posted - January 8, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 3:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that unvaccinated children are healthier, as public health agencies neglect to conduct proper safety studies on childhood vaccines. Research indicates a correlation between vaccinations and various health issues, including asthma, ADHD, developmental delays, and gastrointestinal problems. The increase in the vaccine schedule from 7 in 1986 to over 70 by 2025 raises concerns about safety. I question why agencies refuse to investigate these claims, suggesting they are aware of the potential dangers. I urge caution and skepticism towards vaccines.

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(1/9) 🚨⚠️ Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier — A Thread Our public health agencies flat-out refuse to conduct proper safety studies of the childhood vaccine schedule. It’s not just ironic—it’s criminal. But ind. research clearly shows vaccinated kids are unhealthier. 🧵👇

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(2/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Don’t want asthma or hay fever? Don’t vaccinate. 2005 Enriquez et al. Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15805992/

The relationship between vaccine refusal and self-report of atopic disease in children - PubMed Parents who refuse vaccinations reported less asthma and allergies in their unvaccinated children. Although this relationship was independent of measured confounders, it could be due to differences in other unmeasured lifestyle factors or systematic bias. Further research is needed to verify these r … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(3/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier How about ADHD and autism? No? Then say NO to vaccines. 2017 Mawson et al. Link: https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(4/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Don’t want your child to suffer developmental delays? Skip the vaccines. 2020 Hooker and Miller Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32537156/

Analysis of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children: Developmental delays, asthma, ear infections and gastrointestinal disorders - PubMed In this study, which only allowed for the calculation of unadjusted observational associations, higher ORs were observed within the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group for developmental delays, asthma and ear infections. Further study is necessary to understand the full spectrum of health effects a … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(5/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Do you want your child to have more fevers, eczema, and breathing issues? If not, don’t let your doctor vaccinate them. 2020 Lyons-Weiler and Thomas Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33266457/

Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination - PubMed We performed a retrospective analysis spanning ten years of pediatric practice focused on patients with variable vaccination born into a practice, presenting a unique opportunity to study the effects of variable vaccination on outcomes. The average total incidence of billed office visits per outcome … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(6/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Maybe you enjoy gastrointestinal problems, SEVERE allergies, and CHRONIC ear infections? No? Then don’t vaccinate. 2021 Hooker and Miller Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908159/

Correction: Lyons-Weiler, J., et al. Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8674 pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(8/9) ⚠️💉 Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier In 1986, the CDC’s schedule had 7 childhood vaccines. By 2025, it’s 5 for pregnancy, 70+ for kids, and 130+ for adults—more with non-routine shots. You’d think they’d conduct proper safety studies before mass injecting our kids. https://t.co/ltXej3GSM5

@DrWojakMD - Dr. Wojak, M.D.

(9/9) Why do public health agencies REFUSE to do proper safety studies? They know the truth and are complicit. If they disputed these studies, they’d do their own—IOM has urged CDC since 2013. Vaccines are poison. DON’T trust your doctor. 🚨 Follow for more threads like this. https://t.co/Q6kn9Ouv7b

Video Transcript AI Summary
My time is limited. You have studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated, but we haven't done that comparison. That's the essence of my question. You took 2 minutes to address something that wasn't necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My time is very limited here. So clearly, definitely, unequivocally, you have studied, vaccinated versus unvaccinated. We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated. That's okay. It's Never mind. Just stop there. That that was the meaning of my question. You wasted 2 minutes of my time.
View Full Interactive Feed