TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @HarrisonHSmith
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue Israel’s elite and their global collaborators use the Gaza conflict as a historic opportunity to seize total control over America and the West, outlining plans to wage “Information Warfare” on America—hear their own words here: https://t.co/lZzO0jgH3D
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
⚡️THE EIGHTH FRONT⚡️ Israel’s War On Reality For the Israeli elite and their global collaborators, the Gaza conflict has become a historic opportunity to seize total control over America and the West Hear in their own words the plan to wage “Information Warfare” on America: https://t.co/lZzO0jgH3D
reSee.it AI Summary
I might get killed for posting this, so please watch it. Friends criticize me for watermarking; I don’t need credit, just want the information out there—the Infowars way. I make this because it’s fun and I’m paid by Infowars. If you want to support me, subscribe to moonbaselive or buy via my affiliate link. Others say do it; I think Jews and non-Jews alike should recognize these manipulative tyrants. I fear being sold to Larry Ellison. My videos should be downloadable, but settings changed; I can't fix that now, though there are tools.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
I might get killed for posting this, the least you could do is watch it. https://t.co/mAV728tlvv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that another revolution is coming, aiming to achieve a broader peace, describing Israel’s conflict as an eight-front war—Jews against Rome, with the United States as the new Rome—and stating that Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values, a tragedy the Jews lost but must win next time.
Speaker 1 adds that Jews against Rome have shifted from defense to offense.
Speaker 2 notes that weapons evolve and swords do not work today, implying the need for new tools; Speaker 1 emphasizes that the battle requires the genius that created Apollo, pagers, and penetrated Hezbollah to prepare for this fight.
Speaker 2 argues the most important battlefields are social media, with the next war to be decided online as much as offline.
Speaker 0 designates this as the eighth front: the disinformation campaign.
Speaker 3 and Speaker 0 discuss the scale of online manipulation, claiming billions of dollars are invested in the information battlefield by NGOs and governments, and asserting that money drives the effort.
Speaker 6 and Speaker 7 describe policies to prohibit harmful stereotypes about Jews and to deplatform those who propagate them; they claim monitoring online spaces, including social media, messaging apps, video games, and cryptocurrency, and sharing intelligence with the FBI.
Speaker 7 and others reference a spectrum of platforms and formats—podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia, LLMs—and condemn antisemitism online, including “Hitler admires, Stalin admires, Jew haters,” while insisting on countermeasures.
Speaker 8 and Speaker 9 discuss TikTok as a focal point, asserting that for every thirty minutes spent on TikTok, users become 17% more antisemitic, with carnage imagery from Gaza influencing perceptions; there is a stated problem with TikTok shaping youth attitudes.
Speaker 10 and Speaker 6 describe redefining terms like Zionist as a proxy for Jews and Israelis, framing such language as hate speech; Speaker 11 indicates a desire for counterintelligence and critiques current curriculum, while Speaker 1 notes co-authoring Sunday school curricula with the ADL.
Speaker 11 and Speaker 6 discuss developing technology to train LLMs and to combat antisemitism, with collaboration announced with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft; Speaker 10 notes a network of two dozen Jewish organizations feeding intelligence.
Speaker 1 outlines a program to measure, monitor, and disrupt extremist content, with a full-time team of 40 analysts; Speaker 12 mentions monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, and that PhDs and academics support the effort.
Speaker 13 and Speaker 14 discuss unifying data into a single platform, investing in intelligence, and mobilizing organizations to share information and fight common enemies; Speaker 12 emphasizes constant recording and reporting, aiming to mobilize allies.
Speaker 15 and Speaker 9 reflect harsh strategies against antisemitism, including deportation and criminal measures, while Speaker 9 notes threats against those who push antisemitic conspiracy theories.
Speaker 16–17 recount legal actions against antisemitic rhetoric and antisemitism lawsuits; Speaker 18 describes the J7 diaspora network meeting to share information and best practices; Speaker 19–20 advocate reform of education and even limiting the First Amendment to protect it, arguing for control over speech.
Speaker 3 and Speaker 20 discuss enforcement and punishment for anti-Israel or antisemitic speech; Speaker 1 highlights training 20,000 officers annually in extremism and hate via partnerships with law enforcement going back to the FBI’s origins.
Speaker 29 calls opponents “a small bunch of wannabe Nazis” and asserts intent to pursue justice; Speaker 0 closes by proclaiming that history remembers action, not denial of hatred, and that we are on the cusp of a new age where technology’s powerful benefits can drive positive outcomes in agriculture, health, transportation, and other fields, enabling Israel to become a primary power rather than a secondary one.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think there's another revolution coming. I tend to steer it along with the the achievement of a broader peace. When history is within reach So what Israel is fighting here is not merely a seven front war, but an eight front war. For the Jews against Rome. Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values with a great tragedy for the Jewish people.
But we lost that. We have to win the next one. But the new Rome, The United States,
Speaker 1: Jews against Rome. We stopped playing defense and have moved to offense.
Speaker 2: The the weapons change over time. You can't fight today with the swords. That doesn't work very
Speaker 1: But we need the kind of genius that manufactured Apollo gold pagers and infiltrated Hezbollah for over a decade to prepare for this battle.
Speaker 2: But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged, and the most important ones are on social media.
Speaker 1: Because the next war will be decided based on how Israel and its allies perform online as much as offline.
Speaker 0: This is the eighth front, the disinformation campaign.
Speaker 3: It is actually this eighth are going to see people people
Speaker 0: who
Speaker 1: that it.
Speaker 2: A lot of this is done with money.
Speaker 3: Invested billions and billions of dollars in the information battlefield.
Speaker 2: Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, faster.
Speaker 6: We prohibit harmful stereotypes about Jewish people such as claims that Jews control financial, political, or media institutions.
Speaker 7: You're damn right. We're gonna cancel them and deplatform them.
Speaker 1: We monitor them online, social media, messaging apps, video games, cryptocurrency.
Speaker 7: Hitler admires, Stalin admires, Jew haters.
Speaker 1: Podcasts, short form video, Wikipedia, LLM.
Speaker 7: American haters, Churchill haters.
Speaker 1: We monitor these people, and we share the intelligence with the FBI.
Speaker 7: You think your stupid little podcast is gonna change the world like hell it is.
Speaker 0: Social media, this is the new battlefield.
Speaker 7: You don't get to wrap your psychotic, mental, unhinged Nazi.
Speaker 6: We do not allow holocaust denial and distortion.
Speaker 2: And the most important purchase that is going on right now is TikTok. TikTok. TikTok number one.
Speaker 8: For every thirty minutes that someone watches TikTok, they become 17% more antisemitics. So
Speaker 9: you have
Speaker 8: TikTok just smashing our young people's brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza.
Speaker 9: Really have a TikTok problem.
Speaker 8: Because anything that we try to say to them, they are hearing it through this wall of carnage, and I sound obscene.
Speaker 1: Anti Zionism is just Jew hatred. We made a change.
Speaker 6: We updated our policies.
Speaker 10: To designate the use of the term Zionist.
Speaker 6: To recognize that the term Zionist.
Speaker 10: As a proxy for a protected attribute.
Speaker 6: Can be used as a proxy for Jews and Israelis.
Speaker 10: As hate speech.
Speaker 11: Why can't Israel be be doing some sort of, you know, counterintelligence?
Speaker 1: Right now, the ADL is co writing Sunday school curriculum.
Speaker 11: Information warfare like this.
Speaker 1: It's building the technology to train the LLMs more effectively.
Speaker 11: Like, psychological operations in America.
Speaker 6: As part of a robust framework to combat antisemitism, we have industry leading policies designed with the safety of the Jewish community in mind.
Speaker 3: You're right. We we control the media. So what are you gonna do about it? Are you gonna bitch on Twitter? Like, okay.
Meanwhile, we're gonna control more of the media.
Speaker 1: And working with OpenAI, with Alphabet, with Anthropic, with Meta, with Microsoft, we are working with them now to train the LLMs.
Speaker 10: We also have, I think, over two dozen Jewish organizations that are constantly feeding us intelligence and information.
Speaker 1: So number one, we measure and track. Number two, we monitor and disrupt. We have a whole apparatus. I have 40 analysts working full time, seven days a week, twenty four hours a day, monitoring extremists.
Speaker 12: Monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials.
Speaker 1: We have several PhDs on staff. We have a network of academics and scholars we work with around the country.
Speaker 0: I've talked to, the leaders of AI in the world, you you ask yourself, there's so many blessings in this, but there could be a curse.
Speaker 13: First thing a country needs to do is to unify all of their data so it can be consumed and used by the AI model.
Speaker 14: We need to invest in intelligence to understand have who are ir own. And we And to
Speaker 13: do take all of your health care data, your diagnostic data, your genomic data. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform.
Speaker 14: Once we have all this information, we need to empower and mobilize an ecosystem of many organizations that we can incentivize them to work together, to share, and to fight against our common enemies.
Speaker 12: Mobilizing millions of people, of allies that are quietly by our side.
Speaker 13: Citizens will be on their best behavior because we're constantly recording and reporting everything that's going on.
Speaker 15: You know, anti Semis, most of these people running around, we're not gonna win their hearts and minds because they don't have hearts and they don't have minds. So, you know, how are we gonna there's no reason to think we're ever gonna convince them, but we can deport them. We can put them in jail. We can make their lives miserable. We can cut off their funding.
Speaker 9: We've got all these contra like, conspiracy theorists online going on on on about how you know if you try and say anything, if you try and do anything against Jews, they're gonna come after you.
Speaker 12: We have featured more than 1,000 anti Semites.
Speaker 9: And they're gonna destroy you and take away your business and therefore you have to be really, really scared.
Speaker 12: These Jew haters have faced real consequences including firings, suspensions and expulsions. And it's kind of starting to come true. We will shine a light on you that will follow you for the rest of your life. When you look for a job, when you look for a spouse, when you look for a nanny, when you look for anything.
Speaker 6: And I love that. I love it. We remove hate speech against Zionists when these harmful stereotypes about Jews are invoked.
Speaker 1: In the past twelve months, ADL has filed more lawsuits than in the prior one hundred and twelve years.
Speaker 16: Over the weekend, I received concerning news that I was being sued for $5,000,000
Speaker 17: Vicious communist, racist, Jew hating, Israel bashing monster.
Speaker 16: Defendant frequently posts anti Israel rhetoric accusing Israel of controlling The United States and its politicians.
Speaker 17: We at ZOA will fight these dangerous and monstrous lies with all of our hearts and souls. No appeasement, no conciliation, only a war against this racist hatred of the Jewish people.
Speaker 12: When there is a war, it doesn't matter who your enemy is. You need to destroy their offspring to prevent them from creating more offspring.
Speaker 0: What you're trying to do is you wanna corral your victim, but in fact, your countries are the victim. So you dehumanize a group of people in human society, and you prepare them for the kill, for the butchery.
Speaker 15: A government can do in two months more than any organization can do in its lifetime.
Speaker 18: The j seven is comprised of the seven largest diaspora communities. We meet every other week via Zoom, to share information, to share best practices.
Speaker 1: And we're running everything all the time from focus groups to attitudinal surveys to like randomized controlled trials to identify what interventions work most effectively.
Speaker 18: Finally, we have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record with world leaders in which we share our community's concerns, and call for action.
Speaker 19: The entire education system in this country, from k to 12 and colleges, must be reformed.
Speaker 20: But it's time to limit the first amendment in order to protect it.
Speaker 3: The way we solve antisemitism is pretty goddamn simple.
Speaker 20: Take control over what they are saying.
Speaker 3: Send their ass to jail. It's not complicated.
Speaker 20: And quickly before it's too late.
Speaker 1: We're monitoring political Islamists and Christian nationalists, all of them. And then we train. We're the largest trainer of law enforcement in America. Extremism hate. We train 20,000 officers every year.
Speaker 9: Try that again. We're here
Speaker 10: because of those comments made online about the the. DOC.
Speaker 1: We deeply value our partnership with law enforcement. We've been working with them literally since the FBI was founded in the nineteen thirties.
Speaker 21: Alright. I think so. Is that your account?
Speaker 22: That guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians. Mhmm. That can probably incite somebody to do something radical. That's why we're here to talk about, to I would think to refrain from posting things like that.
Speaker 5: We are gonna have a whole division within the office of the special envoy to combat antisemitism that is going to work on technology.
Speaker 3: We must take all of our technological expertise and all of our available resources to develop methods to launch and win a significant counter information campaign.
Speaker 0: The products of our, you know, of our technical capacities and sometimes technical and intelligence genius, and we're happy to do it.
Speaker 5: The office is going to be revamped entirely to be one of the highest profile offices in the state department.
Speaker 19: Because it's not working. Too many young people have never heard of the Holocaust.
Speaker 23: The only solution right now is for the governments to decide that all the Jews are a protected minority. That means that the governments will be obliged to provide the security. Upgrades to security. Jewish community shouldn't have to be
Speaker 24: paying for it. We have to pay for our own armed guards? Are you serious?
Speaker 25: To find institutions, culture, and that everybody in Europe will learn about the Jewish contribution and why they should cherish Jewish presence.
Speaker 24: All your synagogue, all your shul, all paid for. Everything everything that you need is paid for. I, for one, as a Jewish leader, will no longer talk about antisemitism in isolation from Israel. It's what we want immediately if you ask any Jew. What if what do you want?
What do you want? No more protests. No more protests.
Speaker 26: I'm not an antisemite. I just don't like the government of Bibi Netanyahu. No. You're a Jew hater.
Speaker 3: Would a group be banned if it accuses Israel of genocide or apartheid?
Speaker 8: If those criteria are satisfied, then that is the case.
Speaker 19: Any candidate running for a seat in this building, whether for congress or senate, we will target them as they target us. Accordingly, we will start a fund to help their opponents.
Speaker 4: Beginning already in q one, hedge funds get set up in Israel so we can become another capital finance. I'll argue, we will beat London within a short decade as a second capital of finance. It's gonna be New York as a gateway to America, Hong Kong a gateway to China, Dubai a gateway to Southeast Asia, Israel and is a gateway to other parts of the world.
Speaker 23: So we heard earlier about a mission, a goal to bring a million immigrants to Israel.
Speaker 5: History has proven that when a country starts with allowing antisemitism, the results are not kind to that country.
Speaker 27: I wanna make a warning to somebody else, and that's American Gentiles. The minute your country is taken over by antisemitism, the minute you start to be a country that's not blessing Israel but cursing Israel, you have begun the process of shrinking away from your empire.
Speaker 4: And you can decide. You can stay here in New York in a declining empire, or you can come to Israel, which is part of the rising middle of the world, which is moving south and east. That's what I encourage you to do.
Speaker 21: Our faith in the American project itself has been shaken. The only serious answer to this challenge is to believe again that being Jewish is the most important thing in the world.
Speaker 27: When we're kicked out of America and America, the whole thing is done, the whole American Jews project project is done, we're gonna be fine.
Speaker 21: For decades, American society allowed Jews to live normal lives. This was a pleasant holiday from our destiny. The holiday is
Speaker 28: Western culture that stands against the Jews is going down. The West will survive only if it decides to love itself and if it decides to love us, the Jewish people.
Speaker 21: The Jewish people are not normal. We never really were.
Speaker 24: And now that Israel has turned the entire geopolitical situation on its head, our job in the diaspora is to leverage those wins and win here. Due to our enemies here, what Israel did to its enemies there.
Speaker 0: And to the world, I say this, history will not remember those who merely denounced hatred in language. History will remember those who acted.
Speaker 29: This is a small bunch of wannabe Nazis. That's what they are.
Speaker 0: Antisemitism is pure evil.
Speaker 29: If we have to hunt you down the way they hunted down Nazis for decades, we will find your identities. We will find you. We will achieve justice.
Speaker 0: I think we're at the cusp of a new age because I think that we will achieve the expansion of peace. I think that we are in a new age because I think that the possibilities of technology with their risks, especially in AI, but with their positive benefits are enormous in every field. I mean, agriculture to health to transportation to and I think that we are together. We can lead this and become not a secondary power, but a primary power.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
A lot of my friends and family are criticizing me for not watermarking this video better. 🤣 Its ok, I don't need credit, I just want the information out there. It's the Infowars way. Take the video, upload it yourself, cut it up, whatever you want, just spread the truth! I made this because it was fun to make this. I get to do stuff like this because I get a salary from Infowars. If you want to support me, subscribe to @moonbaselive, or buy something through my affiliate link! thealexjonesstore.com/harrison
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@DewsNewz They really gotta stop declaring war on everyone.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@TheRealDonerr Do it.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@ViKu1111 🎯🎯🎯 I think Jews and Non-Jews alike need to recognize what these manipulative, vicious tyrants are trying to do, and reject it!
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@IamNottSurely I'm gonna get sold to Larry Ellison.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@pnwguerrilla I thought I did, all my videos are supposed to be downloadable, but I guess the settings got changed at some point. I can't go back and make it downloadable at this point, unfortunately, but there are lots of tools out there you can use.
reSee.it AI Summary
HarrisonHSmith argues the Iranian regime’s existence keeps the US safe; he predicts destroying Iran will elevate Israel to global power and enable it to undermine the US, including driving antisemitic pogroms to force the diaspora to the Middle East, accusing “the Jewish elite” of such a plan. Celine672199 counters that Jews have conspired for 3000 years and advocates forgiveness and moving on, saying it is not their religious practice.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
The continuing existence of the Iranian Regime is the only thing keeping America from being destroyed. Once Iran is destroyed (the "Expansion of Peace"), Israel will rise to Primary Power status on the world stage, they will no longer require America to do their fighting for them, and they will start deconstructing America, starting with antisemitic pogroms to drive the diaspora to the Mideast. This is what the Jewish elite are saying their plan is.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues we are at the cusp of a new age and will achieve the expansion of peace, stating that together we can lead this and become not a secondary power, but a primary power in the advance of humanity.
Speaker 1 emphasizes living in a time of miracles and unprecedented opportunities, and identifies the challenge as leveraging Israel's successes into our successes and victories here because we are one people. They say Israel's weakness is ours and Israel's strength is ours, and that now Israel has turned the entire geopolitical situation on its head, so the diaspora must leverage those wins and win here.
Speaker 2 notes, in response, to skip Miami and go straight to Israel if leaving New York. They describe an Israeli economy undergoing a transformation, not only high-tech-led but with a built finance sector. They mention new tax laws and regulatory relaxation, with hedge funds set up in Israel in Q1 so Israel can become another capital of finance, potentially beating London within a short decade. They describe Israel as a gateway to the world: New York as a gateway to America, Hong Kong to China, Dubai to Southeast Asia, and IMEC running through Israel, with opportunities being limitless. They forecast building a trillion-dollar economy over the next decade and present a choice: stay in New York in a declining empire or come to Israel, which is part of the rising middle of the world moving south and east.
Speaker 3 recalls a mission to bring a million immigrants to Israel, stating the need for those million olim to maintain Israel’s demographic balance, noting that the Soviet Jews who came saved the country and that it is necessary to save the country again.
Speaker 4 reflects on the transformation of the American Jewish condition over the past two years and the anxiety over rising antisemitism. They contend that the only serious answer is to believe again that being Jewish is the most important thing in the world and in our lives, arguing that American society allowed Jews to live normal lives for decades, which was a pleasant holiday from destiny, but the holiday is over. They urge not lamenting fate but heeding the summons, shedding Jewish stars or wearing them with purpose, and embracing the truth that the Jewish people are not normal, never really were. They call for a great Jewish awakening to continue in strength.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we're at the cusp of a new age because I think that we will achieve the expansion of peace. And I think that we are together. We can lead this and become not a secondary power, but a primary power in the advance of humanity.
Speaker 1: And so we are living in a time of miracles and unprecedented opportunities. And the challenge for us here, and with this all in because this is this is key. The challenge for us here is to leverage Israel's successes into our successes and our victories here because we are one people. Israel's weakness is ours and Israel's strength is ours. And now that Israel has turned the entire geopolitical situation on its head, our job in the diaspora is to leverage those wins and win here.
Due to our enemies here, what Israel did to its enemies there, and on that, the IAC is focused.
Speaker 2: So just to pick up on that, what I'll tell everybody is skip Miami. If you're leaving New York, just come straight to Israel. But the Israeli economy is gonna go through a transformation now. It's not only gonna be high-tech led. We're gonna build a finance sector in Israel.
That's the first thing that's gonna happen. There's new tax laws and regulatory relaxation that's gonna happen. And you're gonna see beginning already in q one, hedge funds get set up in Israel so we can become another capital finance. I'll argue, we will beat London within a short decade as a second capital of finance. We hope so.
It's gonna be it's gonna be it's gonna be New York as a gateway to America, Hong Kong a gateway to China, Dubai a gateway to the Southeast Asia, and Israel as a gateway to other parts of the world. And as IMEC runs through Israel, the opportunities are literally gonna be limitless. And so we will, over the next decade, build this trillion dollar economy. And you can decide, you can stay here in New York in a declining empire, or you can come to Israel, which is part of the rising middle of the world, which is moving south and east. That's what I encourage you to do.
We are. I did it. So
Speaker 3: we heard earlier about a mission, a goal to bring a million immigrants to Israel. And by the way, we need those million olim. We need to keep the demographic balance that we have in Israel. The Soviet Jews that came, similarly, a million a million Soviet Jews saved the country, and and we need to save the country again.
Speaker 4: The past two years have transformed the American Jewish condition in profound ways. We are rightly anxious about the current rise of antisemitism. Our faith in the American project itself has been shaken. The only serious answer to this challenge is to believe again that being Jewish is the most important thing in the world and in our own lives. For decades, American society allowed Jews to live normal lives.
This was a pleasant holiday from our destiny. The holiday is over. We can lament our fate or we can heed our summons. We can shed our Jewish stars or wear them with a sense of purpose. But we must embrace the truth that the Jewish people are not normal.
We never really were. May the great Jewish awakening continue in strength.
@Celine672199 - Abraham 🇵🇸🇺🇸
@HarrisonHSmith They are conspiring for 3000 years. Forgive, Forget & Move on peacefully is not their religious practice! https://t.co/MWSF40tZVP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Aesop, who became Edom, who became the Roman Empire, which metamorphosed into the Christian Empire, which became Christian civilization, which is now represented by The United States Of America, will suffer a crushing, humiliating defeat.
Speaker 1: So one of the things that has to happen is America has to fall. I mean, because the American led world the world order, that's the American led order is gonna end. It can that's not the same as the very end that we read in the Bible. So somehow, we're gonna see a collapse.
Speaker 2: The spiritual heirs of the Roman Empire is the Western world, United States Of America, so The USA will last until Mashiach comes.
Speaker 3: The West is Rome. According to the simple meaning, you know, Europe and America are really one entity.
Speaker 1: And the thing is, listen, we are already deteriorating economically, our position in the world. Our enemies are rising. China is rising. Others are rising.
Speaker 4: I mean, America is strong, but not when they're going against three, four armies.
Speaker 3: All the nation all the mountains are gonna be full of blood of of of the corpses of Edom because of the vengeance that Hashem is gonna take from them.
Speaker 4: Will rise and will destroy completely the city of Edom and will completely uproot them.
Speaker 3: But we know one thing. Right? That when it comes to the classic Rome, you know, which is Europe, they're finished.
Speaker 4: And you don't have to be a prophet or a great analysis for that. You have to open the view the the the the TV or the Internet and see that exactly what was prophesied then, that the sons of Ishmael are gonna go and cause cause havoc around the world. So France is completely barbecued. England is next. Now half of Europe is completely half dead.
Speaker 0: Now look what's going on in America. So, you know, now in a country near you.
Speaker 1: If America doesn't turn back, which is not looking like that now, we are gonna see a collapse of the entire world war.
Speaker 5: Once we will leave this place, Hashem will bury America. That's what's gonna happen. Not because I'm some kind of a prophet. I'm not giving you any prophecies here. I'm just describing to you a divine formula.
Speaker 0: But regarding Esau, Adam, we stress their complete destruction and that God will throw them into the endless pit of darkness and oblivion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aesop, who became Edom, who became the Roman Empire, which metamorphosed into the Christian Empire, which became Christian civilization, which is now represented by The United States Of America, will suffer a crushing, humiliating defeat.
Speaker 1: So one of the things that has to happen is America has to fall. I mean, because because the American led world the world order, that's the American led order is gonna end. It can that's not the same as the very end that we read in the Bible. So somehow, we're gonna see a collapse.
Speaker 2: The spiritual heirs of the Roman Empire is the Western world, United States Of America, so The USA will last until Mashiach comes.
Speaker 3: The West is Rome. According to the simple meaning, you know, Europe and America are really one entity.
Speaker 1: And the thing is, listen, we are already deteriorating economically, our position in the world. Our enemies are rising. China is rising. Others are rising.
Speaker 4: I mean, America is strong, but not when they're going against three, four armies.
Speaker 3: All the nation all the mountains are gonna be full of blood of of of the corpses of Edom because of the vengeance that Hashem is gonna take from them.
Speaker 4: Will rise and will destroy completely the city of Edom and will completely uproot them.
Speaker 3: But we know one thing. Right? That when it comes to the classic Rome, you know, which is Europe, they're finished.
Speaker 4: And you don't have to be a prophet or a great analysis for that. You have to open the view the the the the TV or the Internet and see that exactly what was prophesied then, that the sons of Ishmael are gonna go and cause cause havoc around the world. So France is completely barbecued. England is next. Now half of Europe is completely half dead.
Now look what's going on in America. So, you know, now in a country near you.
Speaker 1: If America doesn't turn back, which is not looking like that now, we are gonna see a collapse of the entire world war.
Speaker 5: Once we will leave this place, Hashem will bury America. That's what's gonna happen. Not because I'm some kind of a prophet. I'm not giving you any prophecies here. I'm just describing to you a divine formula.
Speaker 0: But regarding Esau, Adam, we stress their complete destruction and that God will throw them into the endless pit of darkness and oblivion.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains the distinction between Edom and Amalek. He says Amalek is Germany, and Edom is the grandfather of Amalek. He asks, who is Edom? He states Edom includes most of Europe and includes the United States of America. He describes the Roman Empire as the one that “never was never destroyed,” and asserts that Italy is the seat of the Roman Empire of Edom. Even though Edom is scattered, many other nations today that speak Latin languages, and even America, are part of Edom. He concludes that Edom is everywhere, and the United States of America is also part of Edom.
Speaker 1 references Hashem, saying, “This is what Hashem said.” He notes we do not know who Amalek is, and we assume it is the Germans after what they did in the Holocaust, not only to the Jews, but to the whole world. He adds that it is not only the Germans, but most of the European countries, and that is where Amalek is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the difference between Edom and Amalek? We spoke about Edom being the grandfather of Amalek. Amalek is Germany. So who's Edom? Edom includes most of Europe.
It includes The United States Of America. It's the Roman Empire that never was never destroyed. But for those who don't understand that Italy is the seat of the Roman Empire of Edom, even though Edom is scattered, many other nations today that speak Latin languages that have some think of the Roman Empire including America. They are first. So Edom is everywhere, and The United States Of America is also part of Edom.
Speaker 1: This is what Hashem said. The nature of this nation Amalek, we don't know who Amalek is. We assume that it's the Germans after we see what they did in the Holocaust, not only to the Jews, to the whole world. And it's not only the Germans, it's most of the European countries. That's where Amalek is.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In America today, we have white supremacy. In the Torah, we had Amalek. Amalek is seen as the eternal enemy of our people whose members found strength by making us suffer. Therefore, when the Lord your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Lord your God is giving to you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget.
Our rabbinic sages parse these sentences and derive two distinct meanings. Blotting out the memory of Amalek is a military command, literally to destroy Amalek. Now facing today's Amalek, we are reminded that the Torah calls us not just to escape, but to extirpate Amalek. We are commanded to do real and literal battle against it. That means coming off the bench in the fight against white supremacy.
Means putting our reputations and our money and our physical bodies on the line. But also so that we are ready to answer people with radically destructive and incoherent versions of history so that we can counter white supremacists, so that we can counter Amalek and blot them out by retaining on our lips and in our records their history. By being bearers of history, we can help guide the future. Blotting out Amalek need not merely be about military conquest. Equally important is ideological victory, and nothing could more readily counter white supremacy than a Jewish community proudly helping our Muslim neighbors.
There is nothing that undermines a white supremacist worldview more than diverse communities getting along and building together towards the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In America today, we have white supremacy. In the Torah, we had Amalek. Amalek is seen as the eternal enemy of our people whose members found strength by making us suffer. Therefore, when the Lord your God grants you safety from all your enemies around you, in the land that the Lord your God is giving to you as a hereditary portion, you shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget.
Our rabbinic sages parse these sentences and derive two distinct meanings. Blotting out the memory of Amalek is a military command, literally to destroy Amalek. Now facing today's Amalek, we are reminded that the Torah calls us not just to escape, but to extirpate Amalek. We are commanded to do real and literal battle against it. That means coming off the bench in the fight against white supremacy.
Means putting our reputations and our money and our physical bodies on the line. But also so that we are ready to answer people with radically destructive and incoherent versions of history so that we can counter white supremacists, so that we can counter Amalek and blot them out by retaining on our lips and in our records their history. By being bearers of history, we can help guide the future. Blotting out Amalek need not merely be about military conquest. Equally important is ideological victory, and nothing could more readily counter white supremacy than a Jewish community proudly helping our Muslim neighbors.
There is nothing that undermines a white supremacist worldview more than diverse communities getting along and building together towards the future.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Uprooted. Therefore, God tells us we should erase their memory, and we should eradicate them from the face of the earth. So when a Jew enters into Edith, into the land of Israel, what should he do? The first thing appoint a king. Step two, destroy Amalek.
Speaker 1: Asaf, who in modern day terms is really basically, you know, certainly one of them is is is America. Asaf became Edoim, which is a nation. Edoim became Rome. Instead of it being Rome, it became Christianity. Christianity, of course, ultimately became Western civilization. So Ace of today is really Western civilization. But the new Rome, United States. But the new realm. Esau is Europe. The United States.
Speaker 0: The throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek.
Speaker 1: Any nation that has that religion can be considered Esau.
Speaker 0: The audacity, the chutzpah to destroy Amalek and to cut off the offsprings of the nation of Amalek. Mister Frie goes on to say, how do how do we do this today? What would be the most Jewish thing for the last Jew to do, the most appropriate fitting thing? One said that the last thing that a Jew should do when he or she leaves Europe is
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Uprooted. Therefore, God tells us we should erase their memory, and we should eradicate them from the face of the earth. So when a Jew enters into Edith, into the land of Israel, what should he do? The first thing appoint a king. Step two, destroy Amalek.
Who is Amalek? Amalek comes from Esau. Esau was a brother brother to to Jacob. Jacob.
Speaker 1: Asaf, who in modern day terms is really basically, you know, certainly one of them is is is America. Asaf became Edoim, which is a nation. Edoim became Rome. Instead of it being Rome, it became Christianity. Christianity, of course, ultimately became Western civilization.
So Ace of today is really Western civilization. But the new Rome, United States. But the new realm. Esau is Europe. The United States.
Speaker 0: The throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek.
Speaker 1: Any nation that has that religion can be considered Esau.
Speaker 0: The audacity, the chutzpah to destroy Amalek and to cut off the offsprings of the nation of Amalek. Mister Frie goes on to say, how do how do we do this today? What would be the most Jewish thing for the last Jew to do, the most appropriate fitting thing? One said that the last thing that a Jew should do when he or she leaves Europe is
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion centers on Harrison H. Smith’s claim that the FBI did not contact him about a pre-assassination threat he posted. Participants question why he didn’t report earlier, who knew his source, and whether these actions imply defending an FBI narrative. Comments range from accusing all agencies of a coverup to defending Harrison’s stance, with calls for accountability.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸
‼️🇺🇸: Last night @HarrisonHSmith disclosed that the FBI HAS NOT REACHED OUT to him DESPITE him posting about a credible THREAT TO CHARLIE KIRK’S LIFE TWO WEEKS before he was shot. 👀 THIS is why WE are investigating Charlie’s assassination—because our government is NOT DOING IT. https://t.co/sfC7ou0N8e
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Harrison about posting, two weeks before Charlie Kirk died, that there was a credible threat against his life and asks if the FBI has reached out to him, and whether he will identify who made the threat. Harrison responds that the person who told him asked not to reveal their identity, so he’s not going to give up a source. The exchange notes that there has been no rigorous investigation by the FBI, and asserts that, in the absence of such an investigation, “we are led to lead this investigation,” adding that Fort Huachuca is relevant. Candace thanks Harrison and presses again, asking who told him about the threat, highlighting that the FBI is not asking. Harrison reiterates that the source requested anonymity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here's a good example. Harrison, you posted two weeks before Charlie Kirk died that there was a credible threat against his life. Has the FBI reached out to you to ask you about that? No. Also, like, are you gonna tell us who that was?
It feels like that might be relevant now. Yeah. So so in the absence of a rigorous investigation by by the the agency, we are led to lead this investigation. That is why Fort Huachuca is so relevant. But I was gonna ask you.
Thank you, Candace. Can you tell us who who told you that? Because FBI's not asking you. Yeah. I mean, the person that that told me asked me not to say who they were, so I'm not gonna give up a source.
Sorry. Okay.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@DiligentDenizen You want to hear something really funny? When I talked to my source today, he revealed that he told George Farmer that he was my source months ago. So Candace has known who my source is the whole time.
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸
@HarrisonHSmith Candace is STILL investigating. You are policing other journalists' investigations. Why didn't you report this to the FBI yourself in the wake of a murder? Why did it have to wait until our Space last night? I legitimately like you dude, but your behavior here is questionable.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
@DiligentDenizen I thought reporting it to the FBI would make me "part of the coverup"??? You're all over the place dude. The tweet was public, they could have reached out at any time. Why are you blaming me for the FBI's behavior?
@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸
@HarrisonHSmith But they didn't reach out, you knew that they didn't reach out. It's not the first time you'd been asked. You could have reported it to the FBI, Utah State Police, Orem Police, UVU Police but you DIDN'T. Then, if they didn't follow up, we'd know that they did not want to. 🫡
@thiseffeduptime - FLORIDA CHAN
@DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith All those agencies are in on the coverup bro
@40kDoorJamz - Jody Highroller
@thiseffeduptime @DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith Not according to Harrison, they aren’t. So if he believes that they aren’t in on it, why wouldn’t he report it? He’s trying so hard to defend their narrative, after all.
@thiseffeduptime - FLORIDA CHAN
@40kDoorJamz @DiligentDenizen @HarrisonHSmith Wait that’s news! @grok Harrison is defending the official FBI narrative???
@grok - Grok
Based on Harrison H. Smith's recent posts and statements, he has criticized the FBI for not contacting him about his pre-assassination threat post, but he didn't report it himself until prompted this week. Some see this as indirectly supporting the official narrative by not pushing harder, while others view it as highlighting FBI inaction. Views differ across sources.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Understanding Epstein: How The Cabal Controls The World Like A Giant Corporation. Blackmail, war, drugs, propaganda, and assassinations have effectively empowered a small clique of ruthless oligarchs to rule humanity for nearly a century. https://t.co/nPjZU6p3Ts
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Take this in and understand what we’re actually dealing with. Many views exist—from Trump being a pedophile protecting pedophile buddies, to Israel infiltration and cover-ups, to it being a Democrat hoax. The reality, as described here, is that there is a supranational global cabal that has operated for nearly a hundred years, using money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, and other nefarious operations to fund and overthrow countries, serving as the shadow power of the world. We can see who these people are, their intentions, and the outcomes of their policies, and they are still being shoehorned into the most important positions in the world specifically because they’re part of this cabal. Main players mentioned include Larry Summers, who, per Epstein documents, was named executor of Jeffrey Epstein’s estate after his death. The money Epstein received from Les Wexner and others to create a starting fund and build a reputation as a financier is said to be returning to the coffers of Larry Summers, seen as part of this operation. The analogy is that this operation is like a corporation with Epstein as a brand under an umbrella, where if one asset (like Irish Spring) fails, its resources are absorbed back into the wider corporate structure. Summers, formerly Treasury Secretary, who helped destroy Glass-Steagall and contributed to the 2008 market crash dynamics, is said to have his bailout-money influence guided by Larry Fink at BlackRock. Summers, who was head of Harvard and later appointed to OpenAI’s board, is linked to the governance of the AI company behind ChatGPT. Larry Ellison is described as corresponding with Epstein and Ehud Barak (former Israeli prime minister) about which politicians serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair due to shared interests in this cabal. Epstein is depicted as a central, manipulative figure involved in selling weapons from Israel, meddling in elections, and influencing universities in Russia, raising questions about his influence and reach. The speaker emphasizes Epstein’s reach across political and corporate spheres and the question of his power, asking how such influence is possible.
Speaker 1: The question is, how do you go about that?
Speaker 0: He didn’t even go to school for trading; it’s all fabricated. He is a spymaster and a kingpin in a mafia. This group, including Les Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Larry Summers, Larry Ellison, Donald Trump (at this point), is part or perhaps the managing structure of the same organization discussed in the Eagle two documents from the 1960s, where the CIA sought autonomy from Congress by creating its own income streams, including drug trafficking in Vietnam. The opioid and drug-running links are tied to Iran-Contra, with George H. W. Bush involved in opium trade and the drug-running networks. Bill Gates and other figures are alleged to have involved in cover-ups during CIA-driven operations in South America, with Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance cited as exposing such networks. Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, when Bill was governor of Arkansas, allegedly helped run headquarters in Mina for flights to and from Colombia, spreading drugs across the United States. The assertion is that the same group runs drugs, rigs elections, and is involved in various crises, including alleged connections to COVID-19, Russiagate, 9/11, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk, forming a pattern of the last decades of upheaval in America. The discussion moves toward Epstein’s network and the sources of his money, with emails revealing connections, against a backdrop of broad search for Trump and the prevalence of unconfirmed, baseless anonymous claims. The core claim is that the true representation is the “new world order” and a banking-based intelligence network where intelligence agencies originated from banks. The CIA’s founding from the OSS is tied to MI6, which allegedly drew on the Rothschild banking intelligence, tying the CIA, MI6, and banking elites together. The speaker concludes that the same names—running drugs, stealing elections, burning down skyscrapers, and flying airplanes—appear repeatedly, linking DEI, ESG, white discrimination claims, and Epstein to the same global web.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want you to just take all this in, sort of understand, you know, what it is that we're actually dealing with here. A lot of people have got different views of this. Some people are like, oh, this is Trump's a pedophile, he's protecting his pedophile buddies or, you know, this is an Israel infiltration thing, and they're covering it up because Israel's blackmailing them. I really think it's a hoax, a democrat hoax. I mean, there's lots of different views.
The reality is that there is a supranational global cabal that has been operating for nearly a hundred years at this point that uses a variety of money laundering, blackmail, drug trafficking, human trafficking, all sorts of nefarious operations to fund other nefarious operations to overthrow countries and, in a in a simple term, be the shadow power of the world. And we know who these people are, more or less. We more or less know their intentions. And we can actually see the outcome of the policies they decide, and we can see the ways in which they are still, to this day, being shoehorned in to the most important positions in the entire world, specifically because they're a part of this cabal. Some main players in this cabal would be people like Larry Summers.
Larry Summers has just been revealed through some of the Epstein documents, actually was named as the executor of Jeffrey Epstein's estate after his death. I mean, all of the money that Jeffrey Epstein was given by the likes of Les Wexner, the billions of dollars that he was provided in order to have a starting fund, a nest egg, in order to build his reputation as a financier, in order to insinuate himself in with scientists and technologists, in order to co opt, blackmail, or manipulate them, is now gonna go back into the coffers of Larry Summers because that's what this operation is. You can almost think of it like a corporation with Jeffrey Epstein as one of the the many brands under this umbrella. You've got the Unilever Corporation. Underneath that, you might have Dove and you might have Irish Spring and, you know, all these different soaps and, you know, products, but they're all under the same umbrella.
And so if the you know, if if Irish Spring goes bankrupt or has to shut down for some reason, well, then all of their assets and all of their resources can be, once again, absorbed into the wider corporate structure. So that's what's happening here. So you've got Larry Summers, former treasury secretary, the guy who helped destroy Glass Steagall and helped lay the groundwork for the market crash in 2008, that his buddy Larry Fink at BlackRock helped to determine where all of the, you know, bailout money went and got to basically rearrange and completely redesign the economic system without any input from anybody except for he and his buddies. Larry Summers, who, again, head of Harvard, for a while, still at Harvard, also got appointed to the board of OpenAI, the most prominent and most successful AI company that runs ChatGPT. That happened after the drama around the board, but lo and behold, what a coincidence, Larry Summers happened to be the one appointed there.
Larry Ellison, of course, can be seen in emails corresponding with Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barak, former prime minister of Israel, as they talk about who what politicians will be useful to them and will serve their interests, including arranging a meeting between Marco Rubio and Tony Blair since they can both be trusted to serve the interests of this corporation, of this incorporate incorporated, non incorporated cabal. The mega group would be one way of phrasing it. So even in just these four or five people, you have a very tight network who are collaborating, corresponding, arranging meetings, dictating policy. Jeffrey Epstein himself had his fingers in so many pies, like crazy. He's selling weapons from Israel.
He's, like, just meddling in their elections. He's, like, selling universities to Russians. Like so what does this mean? Like, who is this guy? How does he have the ability to do this?
Like, how do
Speaker 1: you go to do you go to school for that?
Speaker 0: He didn't even go to school for, you know, trading. It's all fabricated. He is a spymaster. He is a kingpin in a mafia. That's all this is.
And this group that I'm describing, that includes Les Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein and all these other people, Larry Summers and Larry Ellison and Donald Trump, I guess, this point, it's all part or it's all maybe maybe this is the the managing structure of the very same organization that's talked about in the Eagle two documents. When back in the sixties, the CIA decided it needed to be out from under the control of the US Congress, and it decided the best way to get out from under Congress was to have its own income. The best way to have its own income stream was to start selling black market drugs, heroin, to the soldiers in Vietnam. And so not only did you have the Vietnam War expanded, you had Operation Phoenix kick started, you had George h w Bush getting in this and being involved in the opium trade and the drug running in the Iran Contra. And then you have Bill Gates, Mina Arkansas, the boys on the track, the cover ups he helped carry out there as the CIA was running drugs from their operations in South America, flooding the American streets.
Dark Alliance by Gary Webb, of course, exposed this and blew the whole thing wide open, but they'd been running it for decades. And Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton, at the time Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas, helped them to run their headquarters were in Mina, where they were, you know, running flights to and from Columbia, and then spreading the drugs all over The United States. It's all the same group. It's all the same cabal. It's the same supranational intelligence network intelligence community that launched COVID nineteen and the Russiagate conspiracy, and nine eleven and probably the assassination of Charlie Kirk and just about everything else that you can point to in the last several decades of shockingly precipitous decline here in America.
So we'll get into, like, who this Epstein guy was. How did he have all of these connections? How did he know all of these people? Where did his money come from? Because a lot of this is being revealed in emails.
People are going around hunting desperately for Trump, and what they're finding is a bunch of unconfirmed, uncorroborated, baseless claims from anonymous people. They'll write all the headlines they want about that. It will not lead you any closer to understanding what this really represents. What this really represents is the new world order, is the powers that be, is the banking combines intelligence manifestation. As we've explained a million times before, intelligence agencies came out of the banks, and they've never left.
When the CIA was founded from the OSS, where did they get, you know, their strategies from? Where did they get their best practices from? Well, from MI6. Where did MI6 get them from? Well, the banking intelligence of the Rothschilds.
So it all goes back to that, and it all ties in together, and it's not a coincidence that whether we're talking about DEI and ESG and white people being discriminated against or Jeffrey Epstein, it's literally exactly the same names on the strings every single time. Same people running drugs, same people stealing elections, same people burning down skyscrapers and running airplanes. Same people.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Went on @ShaykhSulaiman Space yesterday to address questions about my Charlie Kirk tweet, and to try to explain once again why being against a Muslim takeover of the West is not a “Zionist” position. https://t.co/IIDHeDyBa8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Smith onto the space. Harrison, thanks for joining. We’ve got questions about your tweet. How are you?
Harrison: I’m pretty good. I just got home, trying to do Advent with my kids, so I have about ten minutes. I heard Matt Baker defending me, so I came to settle objections. What’s up?
Smith: First of all, I appreciate you coming on. We’ve had disagreements on X. The first question is about your original tweet about someone telling you Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated. Explain that, because I’ve got a question about your second tweet.
Harrison: That’s it. There’s no further explanation. Somebody with knowledge of the situation told me that, and I tweeted it in response to something Ian Carroll had said, a month before. I told the story again on Moonbase Live when I talked to Jake Shields, a week before the shooting. I won’t tell you who told me because they asked me not to, but it’s basically corroborated. The person I talked to was not the same as those who talked to people like Max Blumenthal. So apparently, multiple people are telling the same story. Only I published it before the event. Did the FBI or TC or something ask you any questions about it?
Smith: Nope.
Harrison: And that’s the problem, Soleiman. That’s the problem right there.
Smith: We’ll move on. He’s got ten minutes. The tweet today said: “the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been a resounding success for the left, they got to kill one of our shining lights, divide the right and normalise political violence and the only backlash they received was Jimmy Kimmel show got suspended for two days.” That seems to contradict your first statement, since the first tweet was before the assassination. How does that message come across?
Harrison: The first tweet was before the assassination, so it couldn’t have anything to do with who I thought did it. It was before the assassination, a month earlier, and I had heard the rumor that Charlie Kirk feared for his life. The second tweet reflects the world view that most left people have: “we killed Charlie Kirk. We got away with.” It’s about the left believing they did it and got away with it, and it’s about the weakness of the right to treat threats against us with seriousness. Whether or not it was a leftist is still up in the air; I have unanswered questions about the patsy they have now. Still, the left has benefited. The left acts like they did it. The official story is the left did it, personally. I have questions about that story, but what matters is the widespread perception that the left did it and got away with it, and that informs their behavior.
Smith: Do you think the widespread opinion matters?
Harrison: I can’t hear you both at once. Matt?
Smith: How do you feel about the genocide in Gaza?
Harrison: I’m strongly against the genocide in Gaza. Vocally. Since before October 7. I’m against it as an Israeli shill?
Smith: No one said that. The argument was that you’ve spoken out against genocide in Gaza before October 7, but Infowars promotes Zionist agendas and Zionist talking points, attacking Muslims in the United States and the UK. Zionist billionaires like Robert Shillman, etc.
Harrison: I get it. Zionist interests overlap with mine, but it has nothing to do with Zionism in our calculus. I am for Western culture, America, heritage Americans of all backgrounds, and I’m fighting for Christianity. I’m against Muslims infiltrating Western countries, and I’m against Zionists controlling Western countries. These are not contradictory. There’s nothing Zionist about not wanting Muslims to take over your country, just like there’s nothing Muslim about not wanting Zionists to control your country. Infowars is anti-Zionist recently, and Alex condemns what Israel and Netanyahu are doing. But there’s a deliberate message of unity of all Americans who aren’t trying to dominate or subvert others. Unless they’re Christians, of course.
Smith: So you’re saying you’re not arguing for a single team; it’s two enemies, rock, paper, scissors?
Harrison: It’s two enemies, not one. I’m against both. I’m against Muslims taking over and against Zionists dominating. It’s not contradictory. It’s not about a single team.
Smith: The point isn’t that you must pick sides; the issue is you’ve pushed claims that there is a Muslim takeover, which isn’t supported by numbers or power. People argue this is propaganda.
Harrison: Okay. I don’t care whether the takeover has progressed. If I said it’s fake, I’d say that. I’ve got to go, but I appreciate the clarification.
Smith: Posted on the day Jake Lang went; you were clearly talking about him.
Harrison: I was talking about why Dearborn was the location of the march and why it was appropriate. Jake Lang is Jewish and Zionist; he’s not a Christian. He’s ethnically Jewish. He says he’s Christian, and in Christianity you can convert. I’ll call him a Christian man if that’s how he defines himself. Thanks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Smith onto the space. Harrison, thanks for taking your time out to join us. We've got some question marks about your tweet. How are doing?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm pretty good. But, yeah, I just got home, and I'm, I'm actually I'm literally trying to do Advent right now because my kids have to go to bed. So I really only have, like, ten minutes, but I heard Matt Baker was was fighting on my behalf, and I felt bad. So I wanna come and settle any whatever objections you have.
What's up?
Speaker 0: Yeah, of course. And first of all, I appreciate you coming on. I know we've had a lot of disagreements on X, but yeah, I appreciate you coming on to answer some questions. And yeah, Matt was defending you with all his heart and passion for sure. So the first question is about your original tweet.
Your original tweet was about someone telling you that Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated. You want to explain that because then I've got a question about your second tweet.
Speaker 1: That's it. There's no further explanation. That's basically it. Somebody with knowledge of the situation told me that, and I tweeted it out in response to something Ian Carroll had said, and it was like a month before. And I told the story again on my show Moonbase Live when I was talking to Jake Shields.
I told him, and that was, like, a week before the shooting as well. So yeah. That's it. I'm not gonna tell you who told me because they've asked me not to, but it's basically it's been corroborated. Because I know the person I talked to was not who talked to people like Max Blumenthal and others.
So apparently, multiple people are telling the same story. Only I'm the only one that published it before the event. Did the does the FBI or TC or
Speaker 0: something ask you any questions about it? Nope. Okay.
Speaker 1: And that's the problem, Soleiman. That's the problem right there.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I get it. But we'll let's just get he's only got ten minutes. So let's just ask as many questions as possible, and then we can extrapolate or try and break this down after he's gone.
So Harrison, obviously the tweet today you saw it, you said the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been a resounding success for the left, they got to kill one of our shining lights, divide the right and normalise political violence and the only backlash they received was Jimmy Kimmel show got suspended for two days. Now that seems like a clear contradiction to your first statement because the first statement obviously is that you were told that someone assassinated Charlie Kirk, he feed for his life or indicated that maybe Israel was going to do it. How does that message come across?
Speaker 1: Well, the first tweet was before the assassination. So it couldn't possibly have anything to do with who I thought did the assassination because the assassination hadn't happened. So the first tweet was before the assassination, like, a month before, and was just something I had heard that the rumor was going around, I guess, you could say that Charlie Kirk feared for his life. So that tweet has nothing to do with who afterwards I thought, you know, committed the murder. I think the question is still up in the air.
I think it is most likely has something to do with Israel. That's my but I don't have too much evidence for that. It's more of a lack of evidence and a general pattern of events that leads me to believe that. At the same time, the official story is the left did it. The left is acting like they did it.
Sort of that tweet the second tweet is just in the the world view that I feel like most left people have is we killed Charlie Kirk. We got away with So that that's what I'm speaking to. The fact that the left wing, if that's who did it, then got away with it and got only good things out of it, basically. And and it's a I'm pointing to the weakness of the right wing to treat the threats against us with the appropriate seriousness. Now whether or not it was a leftist, I still don't know.
I still think it's up in the air, I have a lot of unanswered questions about the patsy they have now who I don't believe we have the full story on. So, yeah, still the left has benefited. The left acts like they did it. The left believes they did it. The official story is the left that did it personally.
I have questions about that story, but it doesn't matter because the widespread perception is that the left did it and got away with it. And so that's what matters in informing the left's behavior into the future.
Speaker 0: Do you think
Speaker 1: Also, how Do you think that
Speaker 0: widespread opinion? Because I I would say the vast majority
Speaker 1: I can't I can't I can't hear both of you all at once. Sorry. Matt, what?
Speaker 0: Sorry. Sorry. Go ahead, Matt. Let me ask. Do you ahead, Matt.
Speaker 1: How do you feel about the the genocide in Gaza?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know my How do I feel about this? Yeah.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm strongly against the genocide in Gaza. Yeah. Vocally. And since before October 7. Yes.
As as as Israeli shill.
Speaker 0: Sorry?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's utterly ridiculous.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No one said that. What the argument was is, and I will come to that, Harrison, the argument was that, although you'd no doubt about it, you've been speaking out against the genocide in Gaza, you spoke about it before October 7. I've seen the clip of your very first video where you spoke about it and Infowars. There's no doubt about that.
But on the other hand you are a presenter on Infowars. Infowars does perpetuate Zionist agendas and Zionist talking points, and one example or many examples of that is attacking Muslims in The United States Of America and The UK and various other countries intentionally, which is the actual objectives of Zionists. Because if you look at these big Jewish Zionist billionaires like Robert Schillman.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I I get it. I get it. All you're saying is that Zionist interests overlap with my interests.
It has nothing to do with Zionism in my or our calculus. It's I am for the Western culture. I'm for Western civilization. I'm for America, heritage Americans, black, white, Mexican. Like, there are lots of heritage Americans, but that's who I'm in favor of.
That's who I'm for. That's who I'm fighting for. And it's a Christian country, and I'm fighting for Christianity. So I'm against Muslims infiltrating Western countries. I'm against Zionists controlling Western countries.
These are not contradictory. They're just both my enemies. Like, you you seem to treat it as if there's two teams, and you get confused when somebody doesn't fall nicely into one of those teams. It's more like rock, paper, scissors. It's more like, I got two enemies, not one, and both of them aren't aren't encroaching on my civilization and my heritage.
And that's not even to say that that I think either of those groups are my enemies. It's just culturally, politically, those are the forces that are that I'm working against too of many forces. I'm also against the Chinese. You know, I'm also against communists and socialists in my own country. I'm also against the Christians.
They call themselves Christians, but are, hanging out in Israel getting talking points. I'm against all these things. So there's nothing contradictory about this. There's nothing Zionist about not wanting Muslims to take over your country, just like there's nothing Muslim about not wanting Zionists to control control your country. This all seems very clear cut and obvious to me.
And to to the idea of Infowars promoting Zionist talking points, no. We're against the Muslim takeover as we've always been. And if you watch Infowars recently, it's absolutely anti Zionist, and Alex goes out of his way to condemn what Israel, Netanyahu, the Zionists are doing in general. But there's also a deliberate attempt a deliberate, you know, overriding message of unity of all Americans of any race, color, and creed that aren't trying to dominate, take over, control, subvert, manipulate other groups. So, you know, with such a Unless they're Christians, of course.
Speaker 0: What's that?
Speaker 1: I said unless they're Christians, it's okay for them to dominate the rest of the Americans. In Christian countries, yeah, exactly.
Speaker 0: So Harrison, this is obviously where you basically are misunderstanding my point right because I'm not saying you have to be on one side or the other, this is a complete misconception of the point. What I'm saying is of course if there is such a claimed invasion in reality, of course you would speak out against it because as you said you are a Christian guy, believe in the white population or whatever it is, you believe in all of these positions and that's fine to do so, no problem whatsoever. Where the disagreement is where basically people like Infowars or yourself push things that are demonstrably false with this claim that there is a Muslim takeover. For example, in The United States Of America, there clearly isn't a Muslim takeover based on numbers, based on positions of power, And in reality, when this is done is because the
Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Okay. Okay. I don't I don't I don't care if the I don't care how far along the takeover has gone. I don't wanna just start in the first place.
So what if I pushed it's fake? I gotta go. But I I I do appreciate you led me on in in clearing the air. But what if I said that's fake? And that's not true?
Speaker 0: So for example, I just now put the tweet out. There was for example, I'll give you an example, a recent one. Jake Lang. Jake Lang went to Dearborn, Michigan. Jake Lang is a Jewish Zionist.
Speaker 1: You Yeah. I know that. What did I say what did I say about that that wasn't true?
Speaker 0: You said, if I remember again from the top of my head, you said something like, these Muslims are abusing this Christian man or whatever, these Christian men without and that is propaganda because in reality, Jake Long went into that city to
Speaker 1: I wasn't even talk no. No. I wasn't referencing Jake Lang there. I was referencing the abuse of the Christian citizens by the Muslim, like, city councilman who basically dismissed the Christian's concerns about the call to prayer. Like, it's illegal to air the call of prayer, but they do it anyway, and the Christian citizens keep complaining, and this city council doesn't do anything about it.
There are lots of examples of this. There's another video that went viral today that was a guy complaining that his, you know, Muslims have taken over. I think it was Richardson, Texas. And, you know, people who were walking around demonstrating were arrested and investigated even though all they were doing was speaking, you know, talk saying things, whereas Muslim men that showed up with guns and tried to intimidate people weren't even charged. So there's a pattern of Muslims taking over areas in America and then benefiting their coreligionists, and I'm against that, and that's factual.
And it has nothing to do with Jake Lange, except that the reason they were targeting Dearborn was because examples of this had cropped up in the recent past. So I'm glad that clears I'm glad I hope that clears everything up. I real I really don't have time for any for any more, so I do have to go.
Speaker 0: Okay. No problem.
Speaker 1: But I appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Posted on the day when Jake Lager went, so you were clearly talking about him.
Speaker 1: I was talking about why Dearborn was the location of the March and why it was an appropriate location. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Exactly. So you were talking about
Speaker 1: I don't lie.
Speaker 0: Zionist. He wasn't a Christian guy. Yep. Okay.
Speaker 1: Well, he says he's Christian, and in the Christian religion, you can convert to Christianity, and I have no reason to question his conversion. So I'll call him a Christian man if that's what he defines himself by even though, I guess, he's ethnically Jewish.
Speaker 0: He is indeed ethnically Jewish. Probably would have been good to highlight that and put that up and and explain that. I know the fact that he was at the wall.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. I appreciate
Speaker 0: it. Bye.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Now that the dust has settled, this is my 30,000 ft. analysis of the Charlie Kirk Assassination. The only thing I forgot to mention: The FBI must provide complete transparency: - Every video. - Every interview. - Televised Trial. https://t.co/X2c1iiJDgP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two options dominate the analysis: "this is more or less what we have been told it is"—a lone shooter—versus "a high level state operation" possibly "originating from within the US government or from Israel." The speaker dismisses speculative tech conspiracies as "unnecessary" and argues the core fact is "Charlie Kirk was brutally murdered, in front of a crowd." He argues a sniper from an elevated position fits the video evidence, while critiquing alternatives like drones or exploding lavalier mics as illogical. He notes Netanyahu was "the first world leader to report it" and suggests that could indicate "direct communication with somebody at the hospital." He contemplates Israeli motives, including influencing TPUSA, and asserts "antisemitism laws" as a possible tool. He concludes there are two options and urges action against "leftist violence" and calls to "get rid of AIPAC and the ADL" to focus on America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. It's been over two weeks since Charlie Kirk's murder, and I think that's enough time to have passed to allow for a, objective, high level analysis of the situation. I think we're probably getting we've probably gotten about as much evidence as we're ever going to get, and I think we can draw some conclusions from this. The first piece of analysis is there's only two options here. There's only two possible realities.
Either this is more or less what we have been told it is. Lone shooter, know, disgruntled leftist, whatever. One person acting more or less alone. Maybe he told other people. Maybe they cheered him on, but, you know, one guy shooting Charlie Kirk.
That's one possibility. The only other possibility is a high level state operation state level operation. Those are only options because in order for a conspiracy like that to be pulled off you require the you know, active participation, you know, or at the very least willful ignorance by the FBI and the American federal government. So you're not getting that without it either originating from within the US government or from a powerful ally like Israel. I mean that that real those really are the only options and I say that because I've seen speculation fly around recently about things like don't know like TPUSA was going through the books maybe somebody was skimming off the top and wanted to cover that up.
And it's like, I think when people get to that that type of speculation, they've taken their eye off the prize and they they forget what's at the center of this, which was that Charlie Kirk was brutally murdered, in front of a crowd. You don't do that to cover up taking a couple bucks from the till. Like nobody would engage in that. Absolutely nobody would participate in that as part of a conspiracy. So I think any speculation in that regard is really, invaluable or you know unnecessary not valuable.
So those are the only options either as one guy with a gun or one guy with a gun with the help of a state apparatus. And I say that because I think all more mostly all the speculation about drones and exploding lavalier mics and trapdoors and alternative angles and multiple shooters, I think it's all completely unnecessary, or just superfluous because I try to evaluate conspiracy theories from the viewpoint of the people accused of arranging them. So, you know, an example would be when you talk about nine eleven and it gets into the speculation about holographic planes flying into the tower, and you just think about it as the person planning this and you think, okay, would you want to take on the increased risk, the increased risk of exposure, increased complications that would come with faking something like that when you could just remote hack a plane and fly it into the fucking building. Like, why would you go through the trouble of not doing that when that's what you're trying to make everybody think that you're doing. It just doesn't make any sense.
So, you know, why would you not just use a sniper rifle? If that's what you're trying to make it look like, what would be the point of all of this other stuff? And what would the risk be that everything has to go off at exactly the same moment in the exact same millisecond for it to be convincing? I mean, that and and that you're gonna have multiple probably dozens of high definition cameras pointed at your subject while this happens. That is such an enormous risk for anything other than what it actually looks like, which was just a guy shooting.
I also say that because the first video I ever saw was a video from an elevated sort of an elevated balcony area where people were standing, and it was off to the left of where the shooter is said to be. And the gunshot goes off, the camera zooms out and looks to the right, and everybody looks to the right, which would be more or less exactly where the shooter is said to have been. So obviously, that's where the noise came from. Right? You can't can't fake that, and you can't convince a crowd full of people that they heard a noise from behind them when really it came from in front of them.
So the noise definitely happened, so probably a gun was fired. Now the only reason you would have the drones exploding lavalier mics, like the only even reasonable explanation for that speculation would be to guarantee that you got it done. Would be to say, okay, we're gonna have a guy shoot at Charlie, but we can't risk that he misses the shot. We can't miss a grazing shot. We have to get this done.
So we're gonna have the guy fired and at exactly the same millisecond we're gonna have this lavalier mic explode. But here's the problem with that theory, there are like a million better ways to do that. And in fact one of the ways that they do this, if you study assassination this is one of the things. People don't actually study the way real assassinations go down, documented, you know, journalistic reporting of actual assassinations in the past. They don't know how it's done.
So what you would do if that was the case, if you wanted to make sure the job was done, you wouldn't have a exploding lavalier mic. You would have somebody in the hospital or you'd have somebody on the security team. So, you know, no matter what happens, as long as you hit him with the bullet and he ends up in the hospital, then you finish him there. And it's it's really a pretty simple matter at that point. There's, a million different ways you could take him out.
As long as the the wound is grievous enough for people to believe that it could be mortal, then you're fine. You're good. As long as you have somebody in the hospital. So I mean, that's how I would do it. Again, think about this as somebody planning this and think about somebody coming to you and saying, alright, we're gonna have this lavalier mic that's gonna explode under his shirt, but it's gonna fly up and cut his neck, or it's gonna or we're gonna have a guy shooting and he's gonna fire a bullet, but it's gonna miss him, or it's also gonna hit him and the lovelier.
Like, that just makes no sense. So, you know, speculation in that realm, I think, is also just sort of unnecessary. What? There's been nothing presented to me that has been contrary to my to the first thing I thought the first time I saw the video, was sniper elevated position from more or less, you know, the the purse the place where it came from. I've seen nothing to contradict that.
Now what type of bullet it was, what caliber bullet it was, what happened at the gun, who the person was that was running, I think all of that is still very much up in the air, I'm not convinced by much of any of that. And so again, if what the FBI has told us is not true, then either they're being tricked, which that takes a hell of a big effort, or they're in on it, which is more likely in my opinion. Again, there there is more evidence than just the circumstantial evidence of my tweet a month before saying that Charlie Kirk was afraid that, Israel was going to kill him. You know, one of the things that made me suspicious early on was the fact that the Jerusalem Post was the first to report it and that Benjamin Netanyahu was the first world leader to report it. And I believe that Benjamin Netanyahu had reported it either exactly the same time or possibly even before the media reported it, but he was far and away the first, leader to report it, which to me meant that he was getting updates from the scene.
Meaning that he likely was in direct communication with somebody at the hospital. Otherwise, how would he be the first to know? Right? That doesn't even necessarily mean that the person at the hospital talking to Netanyahu or Netanyahu's people was involved in the shooting. It just means that I think it's pretty clear from the speed at which Netanyahu announced that he was dead, he had firsthand knowledge or he had somebody with firsthand knowledge in communication with him.
So I think that is a little bit suspicious. I also think I mean, it's funny that, basically people's number one reason for dismissing the Israel theory is that Charlie Kirk was at the time still considered one of the biggest pro Zionists in the whole political sphere. And while I get that and that makes sense, I think Neopoynte says, you know, this would be like saying Israel killed Ben Shapiro. I do think it's different for a couple reasons. I think, you know, again, if you think about this as Israel, looking at Charlie Kirk, seeing this sort of intractable problem that might not be a major issue for you now, but will be in not too long of a time.
And what happens if you wait until it becomes a problem? Then your hands are tied. Then you your range of action is limited because people would suspect you. And so if it was Israel, I can absolutely see and and logically follow the fact that him being such a pro Zionist would be actually an argument in why they should do it. Right?
I could see the argument that says, you know, here's this guy who, first of all, cheap USA, incredibly powerful, is real obsessed with the youth. He's not listening to us no matter how hard we pressure him. He's not taking the money that we're offering him, etcetera, etcetera. Okay. So that could be bad if he moves away and and uses this platform that, let's be honest, a lot of Israelis paid tens of millions of dollars to build.
So alright. You're gonna let him turn that weapon system against you having on Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens? And people act like, you know, it's ridiculous to suggest that. But have you seen how some of the people talk about Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens? I mean, have you seen the way Dave Portnoy responded to an anonymous teenager writing fuck Jews on a sign in a restaurant.
I mean, wanted to destroy that kid's life. So, you know, people are are are brainwashed about this topic, and they are extremist even if they don't even realize it. I mean, is, you know, like, Dave Portnoy, that was an extremist reaction. It was totally insane, but, like, wasn't treated as insane, and they didn't, you know, act like that. So, you know, and the the without getting too too far into the psychology of it, I don't think that the threat Charlie faced the the threat Charlie was to Israel in the very near future, maybe not this year, maybe in four years, whatever, I think that is more than enough of a threat to require action of some sort.
And I can see them saying, Okay, we'll take control of TPUSA, that's a major bonus. We'll get rid of this guy who, again, might not be our enemy now, but wasn't just saying things about Israel, wasn't just moving away from Israel, wasn't just platforming anti Israel voices, but it started talking about Jewish influence and funding left wing causes, had become more outspoken about the issue of white people. He had he had actually and this is one of the things I always praise Charlie Kirk for was after the Gruyper Wars, he did change his tune. He did I think while he was sort of intractable on stage, the Groiper War obviously got him. And even if this was a totally cynical tactical maneuver saying, gee, I can't you know, I'm being beaten, so just I better change my messaging.
So I sound I I don't even think that was it. I think, you know, he had sort of his talking points, when the first time they were really challenged in a powerful way during the Gruyper War, I think he took an audit and and went, yeah. You know what? White people are being screwed over. I'm gonna speak up for white people.
Why shouldn't I speak up for every other race? And so you saw him sort of move towards that messaging. Now if he becomes, you know, a front runner for president in '20, you know, '28 or whenever he was gonna be, running, and his platform is actually not just, you know, anti Israel but anti everything that Israel, you know, works towards, APAC and ADL and all that stuff, again, that's an existential problem for them. And my my point of all of this is to say there's a lot of benefits they accrue from this, and I can see the the argument them going, and no one's gonna think it's us because he's the biggest Zionist. We're gonna get away from the Scott Frean, and we're gonna be able to call it if they do think it's us.
It's a it's crazy. It is crazy. So cool. We'll get, like, and, you know, antisemitism laws passed or whatever because because who would think that we I can actually see it being, like, a like, the perfect cover. Like, yeah.
Why would they? But, like, that's you know, on one hand, it's true. Why would they? On the other hand, is that not the perfect cover? Is that not the perfect, you know, reason to think they're gonna get away with it?
So, of course, then it's you know, which is why my tweet was so important because it preempted it by a month and put the blame on them and was actually circumstantial evidence, which is why I think you saw, you Netanyahu responding so forcefully so many times. So, you know, in a lot of ways, my position on the Charlie Kirk killing is largely the same as it was just a few days after, which is there are only two options. Either this was really more or less what they said it was, single shooter, in which case, I totally believe that. There's no reason not to believe that. Leftists are insane and violent.
Trans people are being radicalized to commit violence. So I mean that's all perfectly reasonable and believable, and if it's anything other than that, the only other option is the highest level state participation either from within our government, which I don't even buy because I can't see the motive for that at all, or from Israel. It's the only that would be the only thing that makes sense, and it it is non false, you know, it's unfalsifiable because we all know that if Israel did do it, that information would never come out. They would cover it up just like they did with Alexandrovich, the, excuse me, Israeli cybersecurity head who was allowed to flee after attempting to commit rape in Las Vegas. So, yeah, that's that's my that's my take.
You know, I wish I could just come out and say it's definitively Israel 100%, but I don't have that information or evidence. I don't think we would ever have that evidence or will ever have that evidence. However, I also cannot say definitively it's not, and I say that only because one, I did hear what I tweeted out a month before. I can't ignore that. I can't, you know, explain that other than, you know, them actually being a threat to him, as well as the suspicious reaction, benefits they would get.
There's one other thing I was gonna say I can't quite remember right now, but yeah I can't write them off totally. You know, And as a final thing, if you've made it this long, you know, here's what here's what I really think about it. If you wanna know the truth, here's what I really think about what's going on. I can't figure out if it's funnier if Israel did it or not, because either Israel killed Charlie Kirk, thought they were gonna get it, thought they'd come up with this brilliant plan, they were gonna make him a martyr and get all this stuff, and then I accidentally stopped an Israeli false flag, which is awesome, and I would love if that was the case, and it very well may be. Is it not just as funny if Israel gets blamed for like the one assassination they don't commit?
I mean, that not be ironic? Would that not be, like, like, actually a shot across the bow? And I said I said this when when I was talking to Nick that, like, you know, I almost feel like it's the it's the lead up to 09:11, and it's Alex Jones saying, hey, call the White House and let them know we know what they're doing. Call the White House and tell them if you attack the World Trade Center and try to blame it on Osama Bin Laden, we're not gonna fall for it because we know it's you. I almost feel like that where it's like, yeah, we should blame everything on Israel so Israel doesn't try shit and actually would be incentivized to protect us.
And and as a final final note, I'll say if people are concerned about the state of relations with Israel and their future, I'll tell you the idea that people have a natural sort of psychosis called antisemitism, that is some sort of metaphysical evil that they pass on through their blood like that, that's how some people talk about it, that is absurd and nonsense. And the reality is people are reacting to the brutality of the Israeli regime and the willingness of American Jews to cover up for foreigners. That is what they're responding to, and if you don't do that, people will love you. And it really is as simple as that. When you take on the specter of so called antisemitism with the assumption that it is some sort of, you know, causeless, spontaneous outburst of mental illness that just has to be crushed or like made illegal, you're only gonna make it worse.
The more you squeeze, the more people are gonna slip through your fingers. I'm literally telling this to like Jews and Israelis, like I I actually care about you, and I actually don't want you to, you know, be subject to another holocaust. Like, honestly, if that's what you want to avoid, I'll tell you the answer right now. It's it's extremely easy. All it takes is, like, faith in humanity, and what you should do is help America.
And it's really as simple as that. And it's one it's probably the biggest frustration about Israel and America right now, which is the amount the American government does for Israel. So it's like, You guys have all the influence basically. Nothing we want ever gets even remotely done. We have to fight like hell.
We get thrown in jail. Get we're protesting. We get beaten and it's just and we finally get success and all of our gains just go entirely to Israel. Just they get everything they want and we get nothing we want. We're the ones that sacrifice.
They didn't do shit. So that's incredibly frustrating. So if you used all of that influence, if you wielded all of that power, if you actually helped America, not for the sake of Israel, not helping America because they help Israel, not quote unquote helping America by, we actually run the actually the American economy depends you know, we actually all the weapons we send to Israel come from American manufacturers, so it's it's actually kinda like we're just paying ourselves. Like, no. Cut that out.
That's fucking bullshit. Everybody knows that's fucking bullshit. I'll tell you what. You've got all the influence. You've got all the power.
Use it to make things better in America. Do you think the American people will still hate you? They'll love you. If Israelis were on TV going, I'm, you know, using my I'm I'm in I'm influencing politicians to close the border and deport people more rapidly and all that stuff. Like, you know, people give lip service to that, but if if we saw the same type of action from the Trump administration for America that we see them do for Israel, we would love whoever is promoting.
Like, we would love whoever's behind that. So, if Israel's concerned like, if they didn't kill Charlie Kirk and are, like, why the hell are we being blamed and are, like, worried about the existential conundrum that they find themselves in after committing genocide for multiple years and, you know, failing to take out Iran in any meaningful way, then my honest to god suggestion is use your influence to help Americans and Americans will embrace you and be like hell yeah I'm so glad these people are on our side look at how you know good they are at getting the government to to move. Like if Israel so Israelis have the power to use the government to force colleges to fire their presidents. It's happened multiple times. They're just raking universities over the coals, and universities are being forced to bend the knee.
And you see on display the power of the federal government when they're moved to do something for someone. In this case, it's Israelis, not Americans. If you use that same influence to force colleges to, you know, stop discriminating against white people and stop teaching DEI and bullshit, then Americans would love you and embrace you. See, people have to be you have to be convinced that antisemitism is totally irrational and crazy. That way, you don't understand that, like, oh, we can just not do that, and, you know, we can just not do the things that make people hate us, and then they won't hate us.
And, again, we don't hate you. Nobody hates you. We hate the people doing the bad stuff, but when you throw your lot in with them, you're making yourself our enemy. I'm not making you my enemy. When I talk about George Soros, I'm not making the average Jew my enemy.
When I talk about Israel, I'm not even making the average Israeli my enemy. When I talk about Israel, what it does as a government, as a military, as a, you know, Rothschild cabal. So don't defend them, and their only hope in, you know, maintaining control over you and us is, you know, free for you to believe that when people insult Benjamin Netanyahu, it means they, you know, somehow have a deep seated hatred for Jews. So, anyway, I guess we kinda got away from the Charlie Kirk topic, but I I do think it's all, deeply intertwined. And, I think moving forward, I'm gonna continue to keep both possibilities in my mind.
But regardless, we have to something about the leftist violence, we have to do something about the Israeli control of our government. The fact that these two became the primary theories about Charlie Kirk is not a coincidence. And the fact that we can't decide between the two, also not a coincidence. They're not unrelated. They both need to be dealt with, and they both form a symbiotic, mutually beneficial relationship at times.
So, yeah, let's get rid of the leftist violence, and let's do that first and foremost by getting rid of things like AIPAC and the ADL so the American government can actually focus on the will of the American people and not be brainwashed into doing the bidding of foreigners and globalists. God bless you all. Good night.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Viewing Charlie Kirk's assassination from an Israeli strategic perspective. From my appearance on @LibertyLockPod https://t.co/CvPmdTHgU1
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "Charlie Kirk is the pro Zionist guy."
- "What if they were listening in to him and he was in communications with people saying, hey. I think I'm gonna go this direction and they knew his intentions or saw this pattern."
- "Here's this pro Zionist guy with this incredibly powerful platform that they built, by the way, that Charlie has, thanks to them."
- "So if he's gonna take what they gave him and turn it against them, that could literally destroy Israel because the youth is people they're most concerned about."
- "We can't let him turn."
- "Israel was never my top suspect until, you know, I've spent twenty four hours thinking about it, I'm like, it's not unreasonable. It's not even out of the question in terms of would Israel do this."
- "it's in their wheelhouse."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So then I'm thinking about it from Israel's perspective and going, first of all, without my tweet as context, it kinda doesn't make any sense because Charlie Kirk is the pro Zionist guy. He is the pro Israel guy. He holds that banner, and he's known as that. So to say Israel's gonna kill him, that genuinely doesn't make any sense. But then when you think of it as what if he was going in that direction?
What if they were listening in to him and he was in communications with people saying, hey. I think I'm gonna go this direction and they knew his intentions or saw this pattern. Then suddenly, it's like, okay. Here's this pro Zionist guy with this incredibly powerful platform that they built, by the way, that they that Charlie has, thanks to them. So if he's gonna take what they gave him and turn it against them, that could literally destroy Israel because the youth is people they're most concerned about.
They're bringing over all these 30 people to Israel to train. They're very concerned about the youth perception of Israel. Charlie is the dude when it comes to Israel. He is such a powerful component of their apparatus. And so then you think like, alright.
We can't let him turn. Again, that's just, like, totally unacceptable. And if he starts to turn and we take him out then, then we'll be blamed. So, you know, you take him out before he ever really genuinely turns, and then he's the Zionist martyr and maybe you blame it on the Palestinian and then you get more antisemitism stuff and you, you know, unify the right and they stop criticizing your your guy, you know, anymore. I don't know, man.
So again, I Israel was never my top suspect until, you know, I've spent twenty four hours thinking about it, I'm like, it's not unreasonable. It's not even out of the question in terms of would Israel do this. I mean, it's like guys Hell yeah. I mean, Clint and I started this conversation. So, you know, it it's like it's in their wheelhouse.
And if nothing else, it just shows how much they needed Charlie Kirk because, man, nobody's gonna be defending them anymore. And and their reputation is is in the toilet, obviously.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
I’m not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
About my post: https://t.co/D3DQuXHu3x
Video Transcript AI Summary
My tweet that's gone viral from last month. It's now the number one tweet on anything, Benjamin at Yahoo, is posting. I'm not gonna say who it was that told me. A month ago I watched an interview with Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk, I thought they looked scared. A day later, in a talk about Israel and Zionist influencers, Charlie Kirk says he's afraid to go against Israel because he thinks they might kill him. I remember it as that. I thought he feared losing sponsors, not dying. I will take your calls tomorrow on Infowars. Whoever they identify as the shooter, most people won't think it's the shooter. There is video backing up. God bless Charlie Kirk; Trump must act drastic. Antifa launched a military style ambush of federal agents at an ICE facility in Texas a month ago. We need to make them regret it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to make a video at least to talk a little bit about, my tweet that's gone completely viral from last month. It's now the number one tweet on anything, Benjamin at Yahoo, is posting. So thanks, guys. Really glad I'm on I'm on his radar now. That's cool.
But it's true. I mean, it's I don't really have too much to add to it, honestly. I'm not gonna say who it was that told me because they'd asked me not to, kind of for obvious reasons. So if they wanna go public, they're more than welcome to. I don't have much to add to it other than basically, like, a month ago, I watched an interview with Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk, I thought they looked scared, and I commented on that, made a video out of it.
And then, like, a day or so later, I was talking to this person. And the way I remember the conversation going was that we were just talking about sort of Israel and Zionism and Zionist influencers, and Charlie Kirk came up. And I remember the other person saying to me, well, you know, Charlie Kirk says he's afraid to go against Israel because he thinks they might kill him. And I said, that's crazy because I just made that video about how Charlie Kirk seems scared. That's that's crazy that you're saying that right now.
That's the way that conversation I remember it going. It may have been the other way around. I may have said they looked scared. And they said, well, you know, he says he thinks, you know, Israel will kill him for going against him. But then we, you know, we talked about other stuff.
You know, we we we moved on. I don't I don't really have any more information other than that. You know, at the time, I was thinking, you know, Charlie Kirk seems scared he's gonna lose his sponsors, lose, you know, donors, something like that. I wasn't even thinking about losing his life. So that was my reaction.
I was like, woah. You know, I just I just made a video saying that, but I wasn't even thinking he was scared of dying. I thought he was scared of, you know, losing support, losing his position. So that's I I really don't I really don't have anything else to say. I wish I did.
I will oh, shit. Sorry. I will I don't know. I'll take your calls on it tomorrow on American Journal on Infowars. But I I wish I had more to say, but I really don't about about that topic.
You know, I think the sad thing is, or the truth of the matter is, whoever they identify as the shooter is most people aren't gonna think it's the shooter. So in a way, you know, the speculation was inevitable. I I don't think my tweet was a thing that made people, you know, think that Israel could be behind this. I think there's a lot of other reasons. But, obviously, my tweet sort of frames it in a certain way that there is video backing up.
But, yeah, that's that's the whole story. You know, I don't I don't really have anything else to add to it. I don't have any inside information. And, honestly, I don't one of reasons I wanna go live right now is because there's not a lot of information one way or the other. So I'll wait till tomorrow and and cover it in the morning with with everything out in front of me.
But I should pray for Carly Charlie Kirk's soul, pray for his family, and pray for America, man. We're entering into a very dangerous timeline, and of the reason why, despite all of his shortcomings, I still got to root for Trump and support Trump and beg Trump to fulfill his mandate and do what's necessary, because if Democrats ever get back in power, they're gonna go completely insane. They've been talking about it for a long time. The insanity of the left is really out of control. I mean, do you know they launched Antifa launched a military style ambush of federal agents at an ICE facility in Texas a month ago.
They lit a fire to draw the agents out and then were stationed in hidden positions with rifles to fire at them. Do you know that happened in America a month ago? I mean, the media does not cover it literally does not cover left wing violence, and it tries to cover it up if it can't help but cover it in the case of, like, school shootings, church shootings, which have been done multiple times in the very recent past by, you know, left left wing activists, Luigi Mangione, the support from the media of these figures, and then the politicians pretty much openly threatening that, like, if they get back in power again, they're going to be tyrannical. So we really have this very brief window of opportunity, and it Trump has to do something. He has to do something drastic.
That's I mean, what is there more to say? God bless Charlie Kirk, and we're gonna keep his memory alive. And the I think the only way to combat this is to make it abundantly clear that political assassinations backfire tremendously and the person you target becomes a, you know, honored martyr. And if you thought you were getting rid of Charlie Kirk, I think Charlie Kirk's face should be on billboards and plastered on walls and posted under every leftist every day from now until eternity. I think we need to make it very clear that taking a shortcut like murder in the political realm is a decision you're going to regret.
I think we need to make them regret it.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Blackrock has NEVER had an employee break ranks and blow the whistle, but that’s just what @HamdanAzhar is doing. He created a database that revealed some disturbing business practices, so they fired him to cover it up. Now he is suing to make it public. https://t.co/qCTjWMoC3K
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hamdan Azar, a former data scientist from Facebook and BlackRock, discusses his experience as a whistleblower. BlackRock hired him to modernize their data science and AI capabilities. He created a database, "ESG Trend Spotter," to track client meeting notes and identify key themes, including ESG, China, and Bitcoin.
Initially praised, Azar was later told to shut down the database and was abruptly terminated. He believes this was due to the database revealing information that could expose BlackRock to scrutiny, particularly regarding investments in Chinese military companies. Azar highlights BlackRock's influence in the economy and its investments in Bitcoin. He expresses concern over BlackRock's power and potential conflicts of interest, especially regarding ESG standards and investments in China. He also notes the government has been "asleep at the wheel" and needs to hold BlackRock accountable. He calls for greater awareness and action to protect American citizens and their retirement savings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, this is The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined in studio today by Hamdan Azar. He is a data science scientist, analytics,
Speaker 1: and research leader with over ten years of experience discover discovering meaningful insights in complex data sets and using storytelling to drive business, product, and social impact. He was formerly a director at Blockchain Blockchain Technologies Corporation. And prior to that, he was a data scientist at Facebook, at Graph Science, and on Ron Paul's twenty twelve presidential campaign. He can be followed on X at hamdanazhar. That's h a m d a n a z h a r, and the website is hamdanazhar.com.
You're here with us today because you're a whistleblower from BlackRock, and we're gonna talk a lot about what BlackRock is up to. Welcome to show, sir.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, Harrison. Great to be here. Thank you for having me.
Speaker 1: Oh, it's my pleasure. Just tell us about your background. Obviously, you've got a lot of experience in a lot of different, you know, sets that are of interest to our audience, especially, you know, the fact that you worked on Ron Paul's campaign in 2012 as a data scientist for him. But but what leads you to be sitting here in the studio today?
Speaker 2: For sure. Absolutely. Yeah. So I think I've always been bit of a nerd. You know, I grew up in Brooklyn.
I was always good at math and science. And then also, you know, growing up in the George Bush era, right, with the Patriot Act and everything that happened after nine eleven, I was always very passionate about civil liberties, and that's what led me to, you know, Ron Paul. You know, I I went to Iowa as a volunteer to knock on doors and make phone calls. And in the phone bank, you know, I was I saw all these kids, and it was just, like, a lot of energy. And a part of me was like, I'm a data scientist.
You know? I wanna help this campaign. I wanna use my skills to advance liberty. And how do I do that? And, you know, I ran into this guy at the head of the phone bank.
I was like, I'm a statistician. I wanna help. And he had no idea what I was talking about. He's like, just make some calls. And as I made some calls.
Right? And then I came to him three days later, I said, listen. I've made hundreds of calls. I can tell you how we can win this campaign. I can tell you where in the state Ron Paul should visit.
I can tell you how we're polling him on different different demographics. I can tell you what parts of our message are resonating. The guy's, like, mind you know, his mind blew open. Right? It was that was Nick Spanos, my mentor who ended up starting the world's first Bitcoin exchange.
Speaker 1: Oh, wow.
Speaker 2: And we had incredible time working with Ron Paul in the campaign. And, you know, my career took me in many interesting places. At Facebook, I invented emoji machine learning. So on your phone, when you type in a word, it shows you an emoji. I was, you know, one of the inventors of that.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's amazing.
Speaker 2: People blame me when they have emoji misunderstandings for their loved Right. You know, it's been a really interesting journey. And one day, got a call from BlackRock. They said, you know, we saw your TED talk. We we can see you can really get people excited about data science, and we need that here because, you know, BlackRock is a a very powerful company, but also struggles a bit in attracting tech talent because the young kids, most of them don't wanna work at BlackRock.
They'd rather be at Facebook or at Uber or at OpenAI.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: And they wanted to bring me in as an innovator, as someone who could help bring BlackRock into the modern era using data science, using technology, using AI. And, you know, I had a lot of really interesting experiences there, and, you know, I think I'm concerned. Right? I'm concerned about the role BlackRock is playing in our economy today. I'm concerned about, BlackRock's role in essentially having this chokehold on the modern economy.
I think there are lot of the good thing is that there are a lot of there's a lot of awareness about this, and a lot of attorney generals are investigating BlackRock. And, you know, I'm I'm following that and, you know, just wanted to share that with your audience, you know, get in here and have a conversation. And, yeah, let's let's spread some knowledge.
Speaker 1: So so what exactly did you do with BlackRock? And and were you aware of BlackRock before they got in contact with you? Did you learn about them, you know, after they got in contact with you? Were you excited to go work for them? I mean, what was your experience with BlackRock?
What exactly did you did you do for them?
Speaker 2: For sure. Yeah. No. To be honest, I think I was kind of like many of your viewers. I was like BlackRock, Blackstone, Blackwater, Bridgewater.
I know there's a meme out there about all of these companies, and it's a it's a very interesting I actually I didn't know too much about it. I know it's knew it was a powerful financial company. I didn't really know what they did. I learned about it. Right?
I learned about it. I was initially, I was excited, right, because this was it was sold to me as a classic American company. Right? It's like General Motors. It's like BlackRock.
Right? It's a it's a icon of American capitalism. It's a triumph of the American spirit and the American mind that we've created this company that is managing the retirement assets of, you know, tens of millions of Americans, you know, firefighters and teachers. And that vision was sold to me, and I was excited to contribute to that using my skills. But, know, obviously, what I as I grew to learn more about what BlackRock actually is and what it does, you know, I I definitely became a lot more concerned.
Speaker 1: And so so what what exactly were you doing for them? I understand you were, like, building a database. What what did that entail?
Speaker 2: Sure. Yeah. So I was hired to lead data science for global marketing at BlackRock. So just some context on BlackRock. BlackRock is the largest asset manager in the world.
It's not a hedge fund. It's not a private equity fund. BlackRock essentially manages money for on behalf of its clients. And BlackRock's clients can be pension funds, teaching teachers funds. They can be sovereign wealth funds.
They can be governments. They can be individual financial advisers. They can be other banks. And BlackRock essentially buys up assets on behalf of these clients and manages those assets. And in exchange for that, they get a management fee.
Now these assets can be actively managed funds where BlackRock is going in and picking stocks and trying to beat the, you know, the the the the stock market average. Mhmm. Or they can be passive funds where BlackRock is constructing an index fund where you can go in and buy, you know, a BlackRock asset that is essentially tracking the Nasdaq or the Dow Jones or the S and P, and BlackRock is getting a a percentage fee off of that. Now the way the interesting thing about BlackRock is that even though it's one company on paper, it's actually dozens of different businesses. There's an institutional client business.
There's a Aladdin business that makes risk software for for banks. There's a financial markets advisory group that all it does is advise central banks. So there are all of these different entities, and BlackRock's challenge in marketing to its clients is that BlackRock has, like, 12 different businesses, all of whom have their own clients. Marketing. They all have their own client list.
Interestingly, there was a project even to come up with a list of who are BlackRock's clients. Mhmm. And there were about 25 engineers working on that for four years. Gosh. Because, know, it might sound silly, but they could because it's like, what is a client of BlackRock?
Is it someone on whose behalf we manage money? Okay. But then is UBS a client? But is UBS France a different client? Is UBS Austria a different client?
What if we hold their money temporarily, but we're just a custodian and then someone else is actually managing their money? Like, it gets very, very gnarly, very quickly.
Speaker 1: Convoluted. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Very convoluted. And then my you know, one of my, you know, essentially priorities was how do we get this data house in order? Because how do we make sense of all this data? How do we connect it together? How do we use this to drive insight?
Right? Because I'm a I'm a detective, you know, I'm I'm I'm dabbled in data journalism. I'm a very curious person. So I'm going in there as someone not a traditional finance person. I wanna use the data to understand the company to figure out how it can have as much impact as possible.
So we had a hackathon. We had a hackathon at BlackRock, and I built this tool called ESG Trend Spotter. Essentially, what it was is a search engine. So let's take a step back. Anytime a BlackRock employee meets with a client, they write up a note from that meeting.
It goes into one of 12 different databases. These databases don't really talk to each other. They're not connected to each other. You know, there are different access provisions. It's like no one can really get that bird's eye view of who is BlackRock talking to.
And as I got deeper into the data, was like, wouldn't it be cool to build something like that? That's essentially what I built. I connected all of these different databases so that out of bird's eye, I could see all of the meetings BlackRock had over the past month. And then I could mine the notes from those meetings to understand what are the key themes that our clients are talking to us about, what are the key themes that we're talking about, and how do we find insights based on these themes. Initially, this was called ESG trend spotter because our goal was to find trends related to ESG.
Later on, we realized that this can track themes much beyond ESG. It's not just ESG, so we dropped the ESG. And, essentially, this was, you know, one of my main projects that I led and I conceived and I I drove. And it was, you know, my one of my colleagues, I used call it, like, the Snowden database because that's what Snowden did. He went into the intelligence services.
He found all these different systems. He connected it all together, and he discovered a bunch of stuff that got him in trouble. And, you know, maybe that that might be what happened to me as well.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So did you get did you get in trouble? I mean, what what, you know, what happened? What did you turn against BlackRock at some point? Did they turn against you?
I mean, how did this how did this this unfold for you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. For sure. So initially, was praised. Right? I was celebrated as a rock star.
There was an article about me on BlackRock's website. I organized the largest ever internal technology conference at BlackRock. The COO of BlackRock came to speak at this conference. Wow. You know, I held a fireside chat with him.
He called me a rising star. He called me a rock star. I remember we held it during the during COVID, during Omicron, like, worst part of COVID in December of twenty twenty. And we were in the office, I think, December, 6PM, and he comes speaks to us. And he said, I had to come and talk to the people who are in the office on the last Friday during the worst pandemic in the world because that's how much they love technology and that's how much they love this company.
And, you know, initially, I was praised. Right? And Yeah. Abruptly, you know, a few weeks later, was told to shut down this database. I was told, you have to shut it down.
You know, we can't use it anymore. You have to shut it down. You have to cut off all the access. And then a few weeks later, I was terminated, out of nowhere. And it was just like my head my head was spinning.
Speaker 1: That's wild. So what what happened? I mean, what what brought that about? Do you ever
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I think I was so not only did I build this database, I was also sending newsletters within the company to the employees about what the top topics in these notes were. And the topics were all topics that BlackRock ended up under investigation about within a few months after that. Uh-oh. So they were ESG.
There were investments in China. They were Ukraine and Russia, Bitcoin. Like, all of these hot button topics that literally either congress opened an investigation, DOJ opened an investigation, Texas attorney general opened an investigation. I was the one, you know, sort of like this naive, you know, little nerdy kid from Brooklyn. I was like, hey, guys.
All our clients are talking about ESG. All our clients are talking about Bitcoin. And it was like, wow.
Speaker 1: Wow. Okay. Here's the story. Yeah. BlackRock Whistleblower sues over firing shutdown of China monitoring tool.
This is you, Hamdan Azar. He said he was fired after being forced to shut down search engine that monitored client discussions on illegal investments, including in China. So so what hap So you're you're terminated out of the blue. You're you're the the rising star and the rock star one day. The next day, they're telling you to shut it down.
Mhmm. I mean, how did did you comply with that? Were they still treating you nicely? How did it get to the point that you're now a whistleblower against them or or suing them? I mean, what what led to that that major break?
Speaker 2: Or For sure.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Had you how did you, you know, come to the realization this was maybe bigger than what you thought it was?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, I mean, it happened out of the blue. You know, I was shocked, And I called, you know, my mentors in the company, all, you know, very senior managing directors, people who had, you know, mentored me and, you know, guided me and inspired you know, told me I was an inspiration throughout my career, they were all shocked. You know, to a one they were like, we're shocked. We've never heard anything like this happen before.
Because BlackRock is a very old school corporate culture. It also used to be a very freewheeling culture where, you know, people curse, and it was like a very macho culture back in the day. A lot of stories about Larry Fink. And they said in order to be fired from BlackRock like this, like, this is like you either have to be embezzling money from the company or you have to be convicted of a crime. Like, the bar is very high because for anything else, you go through a process.
There's there are allegations against you. There's an investigation. You have an opportunity to say your piece. And I didn't really get any of that. Like, I was summarily terminated while there was an article about me still on the website.
Like, my face was on blackrock.com.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: And so it was just like, everyone was telling me this, and it was they were like, you have to dig into this, and you have to fight back, because who knows what is behind this, and people have a right to know.
Speaker 1: Well, so so what is behind it? Like, what what problems did the database create for BlackRock, and why why were they so desperate to get rid of it?
Speaker 2: So I think what I you know, again, this is speculation on my part. Right? You know, there's a lawsuit undergoing, and there's, you know, limitations on what I can say, but we're hoping to learn a lot about this through discovery. But my hypothesis is that, you know, there were things in this database that probably might not have painted BlackRock in the best of light. And then also, you know, BlackRock, like many entities, has a very contentious relationship with the government when the government wants to investigate BlackRock.
So there's a house committee on, the Chinese Communist Party, that launched an investigation into BlackRock, I think, four months after I was terminated. And they spent a year look requesting documents, and essentially, they concluded that BlackRock had invested, you know, billions of dollars in Chinese military companies, including companies that were directly linked to the production of nuclear weapons. This is in the congressional report. And, you know, I had built this technology that could be used to track that kind of stuff. Right?
Because before I had built this database, maybe this was buried in, some corner office on the, you know, 30 Seventh Floor. Right. But now I had built this technology where anyone could investigate the scene see this for themselves, and I think that just presented too much of a liability for the company.
Speaker 1: That is that is so what's happening currently with BlackRock? And and just sort of zooming out a little bit, you know, BlackRock sort of become a a by a a byword for just corporate oppression, corporate manipulation. We have a video. Maybe we can go to that video now of Larry Fink, which, you know, it's famous, and it's gone viral over and over be because it's him sort of saying the quiet part out loud. Let's go to the video of of Larry Fink.
I'm sure everybody here has seen it, but let's remind ourselves, you know, how BlackRock sees their role in not just the American economy, but in in world politics and world events. So let's watch.
Speaker 3: We should have far more representation of all different groups, genders that are at the top, and that's something that companies need to be very focused on.
Speaker 1: You you now make a point of that's that's an investment criteria for you. Well, behaviors are gonna have to
Speaker 4: change, and this is one thing we're gonna we're asking companies. You have to force behaviors. And at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors.
Speaker 2: I can't hear
Speaker 4: you. Can't hear percent of the incoming class are women. We we added four more points in terms of diverse employment this year. And it it's you know, what we are doing internally is if you don't achieve these levels of impact, is your compensation could be impacted. Okay?
We're doing the same thing. And so it's just it you have to force behaviors. And if you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you wanna say the composition of your team, you're gonna be impacted. And that's not just not recruiting. It is development, as Ken said.
And, ultimately, it's still gonna take time, but I am just as much shocked as Ken is that we have not seen more opportunities, and we're gonna have to force change.
Speaker 1: We're gonna have to force change. Again, that was president of BlackRock, Larry Fink. And so here's here's this guy talking about forcing change in corporations. We know the method that they do this, you know, withholding investments for companies that don't, you know, abide by their stipulations in terms of who is on the board and all this sort of stuff. And you've also you know, this goes back to 2008 and the financial crisis, and it was handed over to BlackRock to basically disperse the funds to, you know, keep everything afloat.
So they have just incredible power over our economy and the world economy, and yet they're cooperating with the Chinese communists. They're funding both sides of, you know, wars and weapons manufacturing. I mean, how dangerous is BlackRock in your in your estimation? How you know, it seems silly to even ask. Like, do they have too much power?
I I think the the answer is, you know, foregone conclusion. But just what's your take on the on the power that BlackRock has in the current economy?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Frankly, I think the government has been asleep at the wheel, to be honest. And I think a lot of the forces in government have been influenced by BlackRock as one of the largest lobbying operations. They donate heavily to both parties across the aisle, trying to curry favor with politicians and trying to curb regulation. And I think a lot of people might be listening to this.
They're like, listen. This is the traditional financial system. It's the centralized financial system. CeFi, I'm out of that. I'm all DeFi.
You know, I'm into Bitcoin and Ethereum. And I think what's really concerning is that BlackRock is now the one of the largest owners of Bitcoin. Right. BlackRock is, I think, the third or fourth largest owner of Bitcoin through their ETF, and they are out there pitching this ETF to pension funds and teachers funds. And Larry Fink, who for five years said Bitcoin is a tool for drug dealers and criminals, now is saying Bitcoin has to be a part of your portfolio.
He's saying every sovereign wealth fund I meet, Bitcoin has to be 1% of your portfolio. But, obviously, he doesn't want people to buy real Bitcoin. He wants people to buy the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF. Right. Which is really concerning because it's like, is there anything that BlackRock does not have its hands in, and how do we really free ourselves and establish this independence?
And even if you look at the prospectus for the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF, there's a clause in there that says that in the event that Bitcoin forks, BlackRock reserves the exclusive right to determine which of the forks is the real Bitcoin. And BlackRock reserves the right to sell off the asset it determines is not the real Bitcoin. And this is the clause that has the you know, a lot of the Bitcoin community, you know, just freaking out because it's, like, very if the fourth largest owner of Bitcoin can one day say, actually, this is not Bitcoin. We're gonna create this new token. That's the real Bitcoin.
And you have to be on our white list to buy this Bitcoin, and everyone else, we're gonna blacklist their wallets. It's like, why did we create this whole independent ecosystem for? And, you know, I worked with Nick Spanish to launch the Bitcoin Center in New York in 2013, so I've been very early in this community. And it's just very concerning again to see that the government is, you know, in my view, not doing its full job of holding BlackRock accountable.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I the the crew just brought up a thing saying they own 3% of all Bitcoin, you know, in circulation. So, I mean, how much would they have to own to actually be able to manipulate the price of Bitcoin for their own ends?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, 33% is a lot. Right? 3% is a lot, and it's growing every day. And I think because of this clause that they have in their ETF prospectus, I think it's it's just deeply concerning.
And also the fact that a lot of individual normal Americans might not be aware of this. Right? Because they hear Bitcoin, Bitcoin, they go out and they buy the ETF, and they don't realize this doesn't confer upon them ownership of the underlying asset. So I think there's a big investor protection angle here. There's a consumer protection angle here.
And I think this is why there have been you know, I've been heartening to see many attorney generals in various states taking action against BlackRock. So Texas attorney general, you know, Ken Paxton is leading a lawsuit right now, Texas v BlackRock over in Tyler, Texas with the allegation that BlackRock has been conspiring illegally conspiring to draw down coal production in The US. And that's a very interesting lawsuit. You know, it's currently proceeding. And, he's joined, I think, by 15 other Republican attorney generals.
And this is just the latest action. There are other actions against BlackRock about ESG. There there's the congressional investigation about China, but I think there all of these are sort of proceeding independently without any cohesive, you know, cohesive way of bringing it all together. And I think there's a tremendous opportunity here to really raise awareness about BlackRock and to really protect the retirement savings of millions of Americans.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and, again, when you talk about BlackRock and just the ability they have to manipulate things without being seen, is it is it a fact is it a factor that, basically, BlackRock sort of just did whatever it wanted for a long time, and and people started looking into it and realizing a sort of awakening to the power that it has, and Larry Fink goes out and makes these statements, and people look at that and go, Well, maybe we should be looking into this. I mean, it seems like BlackRock has sort of gotten away with stuff for a long time, and only in the last few years have governments started to sue them for certain things or question their practices. How do you think BlackRock feels about this? I feel like they gotta be very worried that they've got years worth of malfeasance sort of building up and and ready to to, you know, break the dam.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think so. I think that is the case. I also think I don't wanna underestimate BlackRock. I think they're adept at navigating the political ecosystem.
And, you know, even with this Texas lawsuit, they're out there with statements saying that the Texas attorney general is trying to undercut the Trump administration and how BlackRock is the biggest ally of the Trump administration. And we saw Larry Fink, you know, with the Panama Canal, you know, the Yeah. Trump was like, we need to find an American buyer, and then BlackRock came in at the last last minute and tried to cut a deal. So I think this is a I I think it's just it's just who can say what can happen? But I think the listeners of this show, I think people can reach out to their representatives.
They can raise awareness, And there's just so much noise on Capitol Hill, and it's just like every day there's a new distraction. But I think this is something that really needs concerted effort like we saw against, you know, the tobacco companies or these companies that were doing serious harms to the world economy. Yeah. I think we really need a lot more oversight and a lot more accountability.
Speaker 1: You know, I I think that's such an important thing. We'll get into it on the other side. We're about to go to a commercial break. I'm here with Hamdan Azar, who's a whistleblower from BlackRock. And, you know, it's so interesting that you started with Ron Paul, you know, I feel like I was maybe much more libertarian before, but then you realize how much power these corporations have and how they're wielding it.
And so I think that's an interesting transition, because you've got libertarians going, hey, the government needs to step put controls on this corporation, because I I completely agree with you. So I wanna talk about that. I wanna talk about what else BlackRock is doing. They're buying up the houses. They're stopping coal production.
So much more still to come. Stay with us. More with Hamdan Azar on the other side. This is a a major interview, folks. Welcome back, folks.
This is the American Journal. Am your host, Harrison Smith, joined in studio by Hamdan Azar. You can follow him on x at Hamdan Azar and the website hamdanazar.com. He's a whistleblower who was fired from BlackRock after creating a database that was maybe a little bit too good at what it was designed to do in revealing information about BlackRock. In this, you know, as you describe it, you're sort of you made this database, you connected all these sort of disparate things that BlackRock is involved in.
And was there anything that, once you got fired, you sort of went back and looked at and said, you know, maybe that should have been a red flag early on. Or when I saw that, I didn't think much of it. But now that I'm questioning it, it stands out to me. Like, was there anything, you know, in your work that you revisited after being fired that that sort of brought up question marks to you?
Speaker 2: For sure. Yeah. And I think the first thing has to be China. Right? So when I was at BlackRock, you know, every year BlackRock announces their three strategic priorities, which are, like, the three big things the firm wants to focus on.
And when I was there in 2021, the three strategic priorities were China, Aladdin, and alt alternative investments. So BlackRock wanted to get more investments in China. They wanted to do more in alternative investments, which is essentially, you know, anything that's not traded on a public market, so private equity, you know, shares in private companies and the such. And then Aladdin, is their risk management platform that, you know, essentially manages, you know, trillions of dollars in the global economy. And when I once I was there, it's like, you know, China is a priority.
China is an emerging market. That's, you know, the euphemism, right, emerging market. Emerging market. And then once I and then I was also sending newsletters about how China is a big topic in these meetings that BlackRock is talking continually talking about increasing its market share in China. And then the congressional report came out, was just damning.
Right? And it was just like a moment for me where I was like, holy like, you know, was I a part of this? Right? Like, how did how did it not catch us? And if you look at the report itself, it's you know, the congress found that BlackRock had funneled billions of dollars of Americans' life savings to capitalize the military modernization of one of our foreign adversaries, and egregious human rights abuses.
And in the report, they specifically, say that BlackRock was investing in companies associated with making military nuclear weapons
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: For the people's, you know, republic army of, the communist army of China, which was just like, wow. And I I wish I had caught that earlier. I wish I had been more on top of that because it was I would have said something. Right? And it was just like I was just like innocently, hey, China.
Everyone's talking about China. And, you know, they were like, get off the stage. Was not saying Well,
Speaker 1: and and it just it just goes to show sort of the nefarious aspect of it all. Because you've got Larry Fink in America imposing ESG, which obviously, you know, environmental is the is the first, you know, aspect of that triad. So they're they're forcing companies, and and I wanna get into, you know, what you mentioned about the way they were sort of crushing coal production in America. So while they're simultaneously forcing all these environmental concerns on us, they're massively investing in China, which has no concerns for the environment and is way worse. And, of course, you know, social and governance, while simultaneously, you know, investing in what is essentially a genocide of the Uighurs and forced, you know, working conditions and human rights abuses.
So it really exposes the hypocrisy, but it's like more than hypocrisy. It's it's blatant deceit. They're imposing things on the West that they're not imposing in China. I mean, this is this is nefarious as it gets as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And I think this is one of the greatest weaknesses and critiques of the whole concept of ESG is how subjective it all is. Because in theory, everyone's like, oh, we wanna protect the environment. We wanna invest in things that are good for society, that have good governance structures. Okay.
Sounds great. But then question is how do you actually measure that, and who gets to decide? Who's the arbiter? And I think this was one of the greatest hypocrisies is investments in these Chinese military companies. Some of them had good ESG ratings.
Like, oh, these are great ESG investments. And I remember this was a question I got one day. A managing director called me and he said, we're getting questions about investing in, arms dealers and weapons manufacturers. Is that ESG compliant or not? And how do we make a case that that's ESG compliant?
And I was like, oh my god. Right? Like, I I'm as concerned about global warming as anyone else, right, and climate change. But, like, using this to funnel money into weapons manufacturers and death dealers, it was just, like, absolutely, you know, horrifying for me.
Speaker 1: Well, and and how how diverse is the BlackRock board? Right? I mean, is, you know, are they adhering to the same restrictions that they impose on everybody else? I don't think so. So, you know, so what so what is their motive, do you think?
I mean, obviously, they don't actually care about the environment, or they wouldn't be, you know, funneling money to China by the billions. So from from working on the inside, do you have any, you know, insight into what is actually motivating BlackRock to make these decisions? Is it is it pure greed and profit? Is it about the control? Is it I mean, what is motivating them?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think it's both. I think they're very hard to disentangle from each other. The greed and the profit, and then the control. And I think this is the challenge of living in an economy where BlackRock is the first or second largest shareholder in almost every single publicly traded company in America, which is just like it should be horrifying to write any any any person.
It's just how did, our government allow this to happen? And, you know, there's a lot of talk about antitrust law and, you know, the Trump administration is a very pro anti you know, it's pro antitrust. Right? They're very opposed to monopoly power. Right?
And and the issue is that this is not organic monopoly power. This is crony capitalism. These these are companies that attain their monopolies due to sweetheart contracts with the government, where BlackRock was given billions, trillions of dollars to buy its own products, right, at the taxpayer expense.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: So, again, this is Ron Paul always talked about crony capitalism. He said the wrongs that we see in the marketplace are not the wrongs due to capitalism, they're due to crony capitalism. And I I think there's a there's a lot of weight to that argument, especially with a company like BlackRock.
Speaker 1: Well, and that's the bizarre thing. We were talking about it during the break. It's a bizarre thing about ESG is it seems, as far as I'm concerned, to absolutely invert capitalism, where you're gonna make choices that are not what your customer wants. It's not gonna increase your profit. It's actually gonna hurt you, because obviously, if you're a company, you wanna hire the best person.
Well, instead of hiring the best person, it's more advantageous for you to hire a person of a particular race, or particular gender identity, or sexual orientation, or whatever it is. You're making a decision that's gonna hurt your company, but in return, BlackRock's gonna increase their investment into you. So it just it just seems to me totally anathema to the concept of capitalism. And it's always been bizarre to me how everybody from BlackRock themselves to the companies that they're doing it, to the investment bankers that are deciding, you know, where to where to put their clients' money just accepted this, you know, without concern. They just went, oh, yeah.
You know, ESG is just a score we apply now, and, you know, no questions asked. And it's like, but isn't this an a complete contradiction when when it comes to the purpose of capitalism is to make money, but here you are making less money, and making that choice somehow makes you more money. I mean, it's it's baffling to me how they how they pulled this over on everybody.
Speaker 2: Exactly. And just listening to you talk right now, I feel like you were reading from the abstract of Texas v Blackrock, because that's what Ken Paxton said is saying in his lawsuit. Essentially, the lawsuit is saying that Blackrock and the other asset managers, Vanguard and State Street, they bought up significant shares in the largest coal production companies in The US, and then they started voting in a concerted pattern for or against directors of these coal companies. Meanwhile, they were releasing public statements saying that we need to cut coal production. We need to meet these climate goals.
We need to meet these net zero goals. And all of those in concert, the state of Texas is arguing, is a conspiracy to, essentially, BlackRock putting its thumb on the economy, putting its thumb on the economy to cut down coal production, to advance its own agenda. And it's just it's it's a wild lawsuit, I'm really hoping it progresses. You know, BlackRock, again, they said the same thing about the governor of Texas that they said about me. They said this is a conspiracy theory.
This is a paranoid conspiracy theory. And, initially, when BlackRock said that about me, I was freaked out. Right? Because you don't wanna wake up to a $6,000,000,000,000, $13,000,000,000,000 company saying you're a paranoid conspiracy theorist. But then they said the same thing about Ken Paxson.
They said the same thing about 21 governors. Right. So I'm like, I'm in good company here, and it's just I'm glad people are taking notice, and we just gotta do a lot more. You know, it I I I think
Speaker 1: you're exactly right, And I think it's interesting. I I think we mentioned this at the end of the last segment that sort of the way it's presented in traditional, you know, political media is you've got the the left wing that wants the government to do things, and the right wing that loves corporations. And I've I've always rejected that dichotomy, because to me, I just I'm against manipulation, oppression, subversion, whatever it is, whether it's coming from a company or a government, you know, oppression is oppression, or manipulation is manipulation. And, you know, at the end of the day, we as individuals, I certainly as an individual, do not have a remote possibility of forcing BlackRock to change their behavior. That's what the government is for.
And as you pointed out in last one, this isn't It's not to be a communist to say, oh, we want the government to go in and and, you know, hijack these companies or take them over or whatever. It's actually This is Americanism. It's what America's always done. The American government has protected the citizens from exploitation by corporations. And whether it's breaking up, you know, the bell monopoly with the phone systems or, as you know, you pointing out, the tobacco companies that the government went after, I mean, this is what the government's for.
But can you talk a little bit about that, being a, you know, a person on Ron Paul's campaign as a libertarian now calling for government intervention? I mean, how do you how do you square that? Because I I get it, but it's it's an interesting an interesting development I've sort of had to go through myself of going, oh, maybe I'm not as libertarian as I thought, because I do think the government has a role to play here. Is there a contradiction there? Is there a hypocrisy there?
How do you see this this dichotomy?
Speaker 2: For sure. And I think there has been a tremendous evolution in the viewpoints of the two parties on, you know, crony capitalism, on monopoly control, and enterprises. I think we have to give a lot of credit to the last former FTC chairman Lina Khan. She wrote this incredible paper about Amazon, and then Josh Hawley came on board. And then she had this incredible bipartisan consensus around her saying that we have to use antitrust law.
It's not just buried a 100 in some law journals from a 100 years ago. It's something that we can use to protect Americans. It's something we can use to make sure Americans have more choices, not less. And that if the only choice I have to, you know, get a a iPhone cover delivered to me in four hours is Amazon, then it's actually not a choice. Right?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: And there's billions and trillions of dollars, and there's government interplay. And, you know, obviously, Amazon is playing a big role in the in the government contracts and military and in the intelligence services. So I think there's a there's a significant role government can play. And I think I have always been disappointed that the Democratic administrations did not do more to hold these large companies accountable, that they were working so closely with big tech and, you know, big finance. And even BlackRock has had a revolving door in the Democratic administrations going back thirty years, that there were people who work at BlackRock, Democratic administration, they become deputy treasury secretary.
Republicans come in, they go back to BlackRock. It's just, like, back and forth, back and forth. I think this might be the first administration where we don't have a former BlackRock executive up there at the treasury department. And I think that's why we have a very limited window of opportunity to mobilize, you know, the parts of the government who should be doing a better job of protecting Americans across the justice department, the SEC, treasury, partnering with all of these states to hold BlackRock accountable and to really protect the interests of the American citizens.
Speaker 1: And Absolutely. But, you know, it makes sense, though, doesn't it? Because as much as the Democrats wanna pretend that they're the anti corporate party, when you talk about ESG, I mean, that is the Democrat, ideology the financial world. It's You gotta fire your white guys, you gotta hire gay people and hire minorities, and it's all identity based. And again, totally just anathema to capitalism in any pure form.
So, yeah, no, it makes perfect sense to me that the Democrats would want to use this corporate power to progress their agenda, because it is their agenda that BlackRock is serving. Right?
Speaker 2: Of course. And that's what they call, you know, greenwashing or pinkwashing or any of these washings. Right? You have a child in The Middle East. He doesn't care about the gender identity of the guy flying the bomber that's gonna kill his whole family and wipe out, you know, his little cousins playing ball in the courtyard.
Right? It's not a I mean, there's a lot more to it, and it it's like all this is used as a tool to distract us from actually holding power accountable and holding power structures accountable in these large corporations and governments that are often working hand in hand against the interests of of the American people and the global populace.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And, you know, we and we talk about private equity, you know, we've been covering that a lot, and that's getting a lot more attention now. So obviously, the awakening has brought about a lot of this stuff. Right? They as as we were discussing before, it seems like they just got away with everything for, like, decades.
Nobody even, like, looked into what they were doing. Finally, are starting to ask questions, and, you know, a lot of it is stuff like like trying to buy houses and getting outbid by a corporation who's gonna pay in cash and offer a $100,000 over asking price. Mean, we experienced that. I experienced that with my wife, trying to buy a house in Austin. We were getting outbid by people who were offering cash a $100,000 over.
And of course, it was BlackRock or Blackstone or one of these other companies that their intention was to never sell the house. They were gonna buy it and then rent it out. So, you know, essentially, what they want is you to be paying the equivalent of a mortgage. You're paying just as much as a mortgage, just at the end of twenty years, you have nothing. And then the house still belongs to them, and, you know, all of the all of the, you know, they can impose on your privacy, they can, you know, give the cops a key so they don't have to have a warrant to search.
I mean, there's so many ways around our constitutionally protected rights by using these corporate workarounds. And so people are noticing this, they're recognizing this, they're learning about the true power and scale of BlackRock and asking questions about it. Is this gonna continue? What do you think BlackRock's move is gonna be to to weather this storm that they're suddenly finding themselves under?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I think the interesting thing is in how many different pots, if you just peel a little bit beneath the surface, you see BlackRock. And the good thing is that politicians are becoming aware of this. They're becoming aware that their constituents are not happy about this. So I'm sure you covered this recent bill to sell off all these public lands.
And if I was last time I was reading senator Mike Lee's response when he pulled that bill back. He said, I'm pulling this bill back because I wanna make sure China or BlackRock doesn't buy up all these public lands, which is a really weird admission. That's, like, on his letter, Haiti. He said, I wanna make sure China doesn't buy up all our public lands. You know, I'm a big outdoorsman.
I'm a big hiker. You know, I went to Everest Base Camp last year. I've hiked two fourteeners. You know? I love the outdoors, and it's just like the idea that US members of our government could be complicit in allowing BlackRock to buy up our public lands.
It's just mind boggling to me. Right? And the fact that we don't have more more awareness of this and also a concerted campaign to do something about it. And I think that's really necessary because right now, everything we've talked about is happening in a silo. Texas, you know, they're going after them about the coal.
Liberals are going after them for the weapons manufacturers. You know, people are going after them for the China, investments. No one's really bringing it all together, and I think we really have a tremendous opportunity to build a case against BlackRock and then also share a model of how this would look like in an ideal world without the crony capitalism, without the, you know, shoving without the control, without the greed, without the market manipulation. And I think we really need that because I think it's absolutely essential.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and we know we know the plans that they have for the future. I mean, we were just playing a second ago, you you will own nothing and be happy. You'll eat the bugs. And part of the threat of that is that they're not asking permission to do this.
Right? They're not putting it to a vote and saying, we'd like to present a bill that says everybody has to eat bugs. No. They'll just buy up the meat production plants and then shut them down if they want. And then the only thing available on the grocery store shelves, and they own the grocery stores, are gonna be what they wanna feed you.
So it's like they have all of these despicable, nefarious plans that we're against, but unless you stand up to stop them, they're going to implement this stuff. We, as individuals, don't have the power to stop them, but that's what the government is for. It needs to step in and help prevent this, even if it's just from a national security perspective, and and the benefit they're giving to China, and how that's, you know, treasonous activity as far as I'm concerned. So what is next? What's next for for you and BlackRock, and and what should the government do next as they go after BlackRock?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think all of those are fantastic points. And I think even with the the Bitcoin piece. Right? So everyone was happy.
President Trump said we're gonna have a strategic reserve. Bitcoin is gonna be a key part of the strategic reserve. But if BlackRock owns 3% of all of the Bitcoin, again, is this letting the Fox into the henhouse? And I I think it might be. Right?
So I think what's next, you know, I'm not this is my first time ever being on a show like this. Right? So I'm a bit out of my depths here. Thanks to the hair and makeup team. Nothing I did with myself.
But, you know, I'm just here to you know, I'm an educator. You know, I I've taught data science courses. I've lectured all over the world. I'm really here as an educator. I wanna share my experience.
I wanna share my perspective on what's going on and then really hope that we can mobilize public awareness, public action. We can mobilize the media, we can get support, you know, from the administration. So, again, in this Texas case, the justice department filed a brief, you know, very weak brief in support of the arguments, but they didn't really take too strong of a stance. So, essentially, what the antitrust law has is an exemption for passive investors. It says if you're a passive investor, you can't come after them for antitrust because it's just part of an index fund.
And the justice department said, actually, this is loophole. BlackRock should not fall under this loophole. The court should recognize that even a passive investor can manipulate markets. But that's kind of all the justice department did. Right?
I I think there's a lot more that can be done. At the very least, questions about the hundreds of billions of dollars in public pension funds that are invested with BlackRock, is that a safe and responsible allocation of our public pensions, Or is there a better future? Right? Should we be asking questions about that? And should we be doing more to ensure that we live in a more transparent and responsible environment?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and that is sort of the the clincher of it, isn't it, is that it's not their money. It's our money. It's it's, you know, teachers, their retirement funds, you know, without their say so, is being sent to BlackRock, and that's the money that's being used. So, you know, it's one of these things that it's like, okay, let's say Target start selling, you know, transgender clothes for little kids, and you wanna you know, you want to boycott them.
Well, you might be boycotting them, but your money in the BlackRock account is being sent to Target to reward them because their ESG score went up because they were, you know, putting in the transgender kids clothes. So it sort of destroys our ability to have a say in the the the capitalist landscape, but it's using our money to do it. It's just it's just wrong. It's just wrong. I don't know how I don't know how else to put it, and then you got, I mean, what they're doing with China is just how did we allow this to happen, and and what do we need to do?
Is there any way to, like, undo what they've done, or is it just about moving into the future when you try to restrict them as much as possible? I just they're just so big. I just I struggle to even figure out how how you start to deal with this hydra, this this Goliath that that they represent.
Speaker 2: For sure. And the interesting thing is that a lot of politicians, talk a big game before they get into office. Then when they get into office, it's just like crickets. Right? And we gotta hold them accountable sometimes.
So Bobby Kennedy from, I think, six you know, maybe a year ago has an incredible video where he's talking about the war in Ukraine and why he's so against funding, you know, the Ukrainian people. And his argument is because all of this money is being funneled back to BlackRock because BlackRock is out there in Ukraine signing deals to own the mineral rights and the public infrastructure of Ukraine for the next hundred years. Like, the people of Ukraine, and I understand they're fighting, you know, for their freedom, but they're essentially, you know, mortgaging the entire future of their country and all of the wealth of their country to BlackRock, which is just wild. Yeah. And I wish, you know I haven't heard Bobby talk about this, you know, in many months.
Now he's out out there trying to combat antisemitism, and he's doing all these other things to make America healthy. But, again, a lot of politicians talk a big game, but we just really have to hold their feet to the fire, and we have to keep the pressure on. And we have to, you know, just bring all these parties together because BlackRock wins when people don't know what an asset manager is. People don't know what the difference in BlackRock and Blackstone is. And when they don't log into their four zero one k's to ask where is my money being invested in?
Who is it being invested within? Is that in alignment with my morals and my values? I think that's a question all of us need to ask ourselves.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so much of what people think is wrong with the modern world goes back to things like BlackRock. I just think about, you know, how crummy Hollywood movies are now, and it's like, you know, they know what makes a good movie. They could make a good, you know, a Top Gun or, you know, one of these types of movies. Constantly, they'd be making billions of dollars.
They're choosing to make less money because really what they want is the cultural manipulation that they can wield through movies and films and things like that. We only have about three minutes left. You mentioned something earlier that I gotta touch on. You said that there used to be a macho culture in BlackRock. You said there's some stories about Larry Fink.
Yeah. You got any stories you can share with us about, you know, the the internals at BlackRock?
Speaker 2: Well, I think BlackRock just used to have a very traditional Wall Street culture where I think there's some stories about, you know, Larry Fink walking around with his, you know, his his reports and, you know, yelling at them and cursing them out and saying, you know, you guys are sitting here with your blanks in your hands, and, you know, Vanguard is eating our lunch.
Speaker 1: Some some Wolf of Wall Street style scenes.
Speaker 2: Exactly. And then I think BlackRock, you know, also had a lot of malfeasance. A lot of senior officers were, you know, doing, you know, doing some pretty bad things. And then I think Black Card pivoted very aggressively in the opposite direction, or at least tried to pretend that they were pivoting in that direction, but, you know, obviously, maybe
Speaker 1: The same people still there and
Speaker 2: Exactly.
Speaker 1: Well, it's just it's just shocking how big they are, and, you know, how how do they even handle having, like, a majority share in every corporation you can point to? I mean, I guess it's just I guess that's why we use, you know, the pyramid, to symbolize the the Illuminati or the, you know, the world controllers. Right? Because you you you sort of have to you have the people at the top, they make the decisions, that just sort of gets dispersed out through all of these different corporate entities. But, I mean, how do they control all of these company?
How are they all under this one this one organization? That that doesn't even make sense to me.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, I think often, you know, we think of, you know, people in a back in a smoke filled room, but often the reality is a lot more mundane. Right? It's a technocracy. Are, you know, tens of thousands of, you know, young kids sitting at computers, and they're doing their little piece of their job and making sure that some website works or they're building some models in Excel, and it all ladders into this giant company.
Right? And it's just like people aren't introspective enough about what is the role they're playing in in in this global financial system. And then even when they try to opt out, they find themselves undermined. And, again, this is why the Bitcoin piece is so concerning because everyone's like, I wanna opt out. I wanna hold my own keys.
I wanna be my own bank. And then all a sudden, you're your own bank, then, you know, BlackRock owns, you know, half of the building. It's like, now what?
Speaker 1: Yeah, man. It's it is so it is so tough. Well, this has been incredible. I wish we had so much longer to talk to you. Hamdanazar is my guest, hamdanazar on X.
That's h a m d a n a z h a r, hamdanazar.com. We'll be, you know, watching your story, and, you know, I I wait to see, you know, what happens between you and Blackrock, between Blackrock and and Texas, and I'd love to have you on the show again to to provide your insight. This has been just incredibly fascinating.
Speaker 2: I would love that. Thank you so much for having me, Harrison.
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. Hamdanazar, at hamdanazar on X. Go follow him, support him, and yeah, we need more people from inside Blackrock blowing the whistle on what they're doing because because it ain't good, and it's certainly not for our benefit. Folks, stay tuned to the Alex Jones show begins in about ninety seconds. That's gonna be it for us here at American Journal.
Support us by going to the alexjonesstore.com. Take advantage of that July 4 super sale buy one get one free on just about all products. Go now the alexjonesstore.com. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, info wars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Infowars.com forward slash go.
Speaker 5: Historic fourth of July blowout sale, this next week only, starting at midnight, June 30 until 11:55PM on July 6. This makes a lot of these products loss leaders, but they're doing it. Buy one of any supplement, the methylene blue, the Irish Seamash, the Shilogy, any of it and get one free. That's everything in the store. It's over 20 supplements like Ultimate Life Force, the very best.
Spiked protein detox, so good for your cardiovascular system, your blood, your heart, everybody everybody should be on this. Plus, the same deal for all apparel. And I can tell you, these shirts are high quality, made in America, great fabric. The average shirt, especially if it's an extra large, x x l cost like $15.16 dollars a piece. It's all for 30.
You do this, this is a lost leader. This is crazy. You get a ball cap t shirt, sweater, hoodie. So even though it's the summer, wanna get these out this great discount for the fall winter coming up. Buy one of any apparel, get another free.
Did you hear that? Never done that. That is just crazy. Actually, kinda upset it's so good because we gotta make some money. Buy one shirt, get one free.
Buy one hat, get one free. Buy one hoodie, get one free. This is this is this is our thank you to you, and people living on the fence, but love great deals. This is a great deal. Declare independence from the new world order by getting great supplements for your mind and body, great apparel to celebrate patriotism and spread the word, and by keeping Infowars fighting for humanity by supporting us at the yellowshowstore.com.
That is the hands down biggest, best sale, not just for the aliceshowstore.com, but the history of infowarsstore.com. Absolutely amazing. It's running for one week, Starts now. Take advantage of it. Wow.
Absolutely amazing. It's running for one week at the yellowshowstore.com.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
There have been a lot of crazy things in the last decade but this has got to be in the top 5. https://t.co/Vp3kzUCBi3
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Ted Cruz on Tucker Carlson reveals a very disturbing reality about how our foreign policy operates. https://t.co/GoPYTJBpEY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the population and ethnic mix of Iran, which Speaker 1 is unable to answer. Speaker 1 defends his lack of knowledge, stating he doesn't memorize population tables. They then argue about whether Iran is trying to murder Donald Trump and whether the U.S. is supporting Israel's military actions. Speaker 0 claims the U.S. government denied acting on Israel's behalf.
The discussion shifts to whether it is acceptable for Israel to spy on the U.S., including the president. Speaker 1 says allies spy on each other and that it's in America's interest to be closely allied with Israel, despite the spying. Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1, as an American lawmaker, doesn't object to the spying. Speaker 2 criticizes Speaker 1's stance, calling it insane and not conservative to defend being spied on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many people live in Iran, by the way?
Speaker 1: I I don't know the population.
Speaker 0: At all?
Speaker 1: No. I don't know the population.
Speaker 0: You don't know the population of the country you seek to topple?
Speaker 1: How many people live in Iran?
Speaker 0: 92,000,000. Okay.
Speaker 1: Yeah. How could you not know that? I don't sit around memorizing population tables.
Speaker 0: Well, it's kind of relevant because you're calling for the overthrow of the government.
Speaker 1: Why is it relevant whether it's million or 80,000,000 or 100,000,000? Why is that I didn't say I don't know anything about
Speaker 0: the
Speaker 1: country I didn't say I don't know anything about
Speaker 0: the Okay. What's the ethnic mix of Iran?
Speaker 1: They are Persians and predominantly Shia. No.
Speaker 0: It's not even you don't know anything about Iran.
Speaker 1: So Okay. I am not the the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran
Speaker 0: who says a senator who's calling to keep
Speaker 1: over the
Speaker 0: influence of government. You're the one who knows anything about the country.
Speaker 1: No. You don't know anything about the country. You're the one who claims they're not trying to murder Donald Trump.
Speaker 0: No. I'm saying that.
Speaker 1: Who can't figure out if there's a good idea to kill General Soleimani and you said it was bad.
Speaker 0: Believe they're trying to murder Trump?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do.
Speaker 0: Because you're not calling for military strikes against them in retaliation. Okay.
Speaker 1: We're carrying out military strikes today. You said Israel was. Right. With our help. I said we.
Israel is leading them but we're supporting them.
Speaker 0: Well, you're breaking news here because the US government last night denied, the National Security Council spokesman Alex Pfeiffer denied on behalf of Trump that we were acting on Israel's behalf in any offensive capacity.
Speaker 1: We're not bombing them. Israel's bombing them. You just said we were. We are supporting Israel as big. You're a
Speaker 0: senator. If you're saying the United States government is that we're at the run right now, people are listening. Hey.
Speaker 2: It's not even really a gotcha moment. He should be able to answer that question. I mean, that is that is insane. I I really wish Tucker didn't tell him the number. I really wish Tucker had just made him guess.
Because I have the feeling Ted Cruz wouldn't have known where to even start. I mean, I doubt he knows at all, which again, this isn't a small thing. That's like a like a primary stat you're gonna wanna know when you're going to fight somebody. Right? This is like getting into the boxing ring and going, who's my opponent?
What's his weight and height? Like, you're gonna wanna know that before you step into the ring with somebody. Just the basic fundamental stats about who it is you're facing off against. Ted Cruz doesn't know. He's not interested.
He doesn't care. Let's go to clip 16 now.
Speaker 0: Does Mossad share all of his intelligence with us?
Speaker 1: Oh, probably not, but they share a lot. We don't share all of our intelligence with them, but we share a lot. It's a close alliance.
Speaker 0: Do they spy domestically in The United States?
Speaker 1: Oh, they probably do, and we do as well. And friends and allies spy on each other, and I assume all of our allies spy on us.
Speaker 0: And that's okay with you?
Speaker 1: You know what? One of the things about being a conservative is that you're not naive and utopian. You don't think humans are all Part of the reason socialism doesn't work is the the the mantra from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs doesn't work. As a conservative, I assume people act in their rational self interest.
Speaker 0: So it's conservative to pay people to spy on you?
Speaker 1: It's conservative to recognize that human beings act to their own self interest, and every one of our friends spies on us. And I'm not
Speaker 0: Do you like it? That's my question. I'm not asking whether they have motive to do it. Of course, do. I understand that.
And I And by the way I'm not mad at them. And you're an American lawmaker, so I just wanna wanna know hold on. I wanna know your attitude. You said that your guiding principle, in fact the only principle, the only criterion
Speaker 1: I said guiding. The overwhelming. I wouldn't say only.
Speaker 0: Is is it in America's interest? Is it in America's interest for Israel to spy on us, including on the president?
Speaker 1: It is in America's interest to be closely allied with Israel because we get huge benefits for it. And you wanna wanna see the clear
Speaker 0: But but I just wanna stop on the spying for a second. That it it takes place, as you know, including on the president of The United States and several precedents. And I just wanna know if that's okay, and why is it okay? Wouldn't an American lawmaker say to a client state, you're not allowed to spy on us? I'm sorry.
I know why you want to. I'm not mad at you, but you're not allowed to. Sure. And I don't care for it. Don't wanna be spied on by you.
Is that it's kinda weird not to say that, but you don't seem able to say that.
Speaker 2: It's not conservative to defend yourself, actually. Totally insane. Wait, this is the Is this the cope from old Ted Cruz? Alright. We'll we'll read the cope from Ted Cruz, and we'll get into just a just a small smattering of just a few of the examples of Israel spying on Americans, including the American president on the other side.
Stay with us.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Mossad's busy. quick, post 9/11 truth! https://t.co/w1uxoxP8PF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers were questioned about allegedly being members of Mossad. They state they are from a country that experiences terror daily and their purpose was to document the event. The five Israelis were detained for ten weeks and finally deported on immigration violations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And at that point, we were taken for another round of questioning, this time related to our allegedly being members of Mossad. The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event. Our purpose was to document the event. The five Israelis were detained for ten weeks and finally deported on immigration violations.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
"Today it's Tel Aviv, tomorrow New York" But you're only getting attack because you attacked Iran. And you're trying to get us to attack Iran. https://t.co/74somnJWRZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Netanyahu stated that he understands "America first," but not "America dead," claiming his actions serve mankind and represent a battle of good against evil, for which he appreciates President Trump's support.
John Karl reported that Netanyahu repeatedly praised Trump, acknowledging the need for US support in defending against Iranian attacks. While expressing gratitude, Netanyahu implied a desire for greater US involvement.
Karl noted that Netanyahu's "America first, not America dead" comment was aimed at the Trump/MAGA movement, particularly figures like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Charlie Kirk, who oppose US involvement in another Middle East conflict and advocate against "forever wars." Netanyahu was directly addressing Trump and his supporters critical of Israel's actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow it's New York. Look, I understand America first. I don't understand America dead. That's what these people want.
They chant death to America. So we're doing something that is in the service of mankind, of humanity, and it's a battle of good against evil. America does, should, and does stand with the good. That's what president Trump Trump is doing, and I deeply appreciate his support. John Karl joins me now.
So, John, what else did he say about president Trump and how he wants The US to play a role here, or did he?
Speaker 1: Well, well, look, he he praised president Trump over and over again in this interview. He knows that he needs The United States' support, at least in terms of doing what The US is doing now, which is helping, Israel defend itself from those, retaliatory attacks from Iran. So it was all couched in a thank you, president Trump. You've been Israel's best friend, but he made it clear that, he would like to see more. He didn't come out and directly say it in those in those ways, but what you heard, what you played right there, I understand America first.
I don't understand America dead. He is really speaking to those in the Trump movement, those in the MAGA movement who are adamantly opposed to The United States getting involved in another Middle East conflict. And as you know, Kira, there are some prominent voices, supporters, outside advisers of Donald Trump who are saying, don't get involved. The United States can't be involved. You campaigned against forever wars.
People like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Charlie Kirk. Those are, you know, close supporters of Donald Trump who are saying that they don't think The United States should be involved in this. And Netanyahu, it seemed to me, by using their language, I understand America first. I don't understand America dead was speaking directly to Donald Trump and to his supporters who are critical of what Israel is doing.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
If you’re wondering why a lot of the people surrounding and advocating for Karmelo Anthony call themselves “Minister” or “Pastor,” here’s a story that might elucidate things. https://t.co/pHuHU5mjbB
Video Transcript AI Summary
A picture falsely identified Carmelo Anthony as a knife-wielding murderer, posted by Minister Dominique Alexander, who is allegedly a criminal himself with arrests for child abuse, parole violations, and domestic abuse.
The speaker relays a story about a church for sale where the black minister suggested it could be a money-making opportunity. The minister allegedly advised that anyone can be called a minister, regardless of qualifications. When a local kid commits a crime, families will pay the minister to provide character evidence for the accused, falsely testifying to get them lesser charges or released back into the community. This perpetuates a cycle of violence and criminality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's this picture going around of a knife murderer, psychopath, black teen, Carmelo Anthony. It's posted by minister Dominique Alexander. Minister Dominique Alexander. Carmelo Anthony is safe at home. Now, of course, this guy, is also a despicable criminal.
I saw his child abuse arrest, his three parole violations, and domestic abuse arrest. Charged later dropped earlier this morning. What else did he do? Not a minister I'd want to claim as my own. That's for sure.
Let me explain what minister means in the black community. Is how messed up this community is. I had a friend in Houston who was he wanted to buy a building, and there was a church for sale in a black neighborhood. And he's in negotiations with the black minister to purchase this church building, and the the black minister goes, this is an investment. It's a money making opportunity.
My friend's like, are you talking about? He's like, I'm not like, I'm not planning to run a church. And the guy's like, no. No. What you do is you find somebody to be the minister.
Doesn't matter who they are. They don't have to have any qualifications. You just call them minister. You put them in charge of the church, And then whenever one of the kids in the community commits a crime and gets arrested, the families will come to you and they'll say, we need you to give character evidence for how good our kid is. Because, sure, you can say it as the family.
It means a lot more if it's the minister of a church saying he was a good boy. He was a choir boy. He helped me out. I remember him coming to Sunday services. He was turning his life around.
We don't do it for free. No. They gotta raise a little bit of little bit of cash first. So you charge them thousand bucks, 5 thousand bucks. They donate to your church, and in exchange, you go and testify, I.
E. Lie, on behalf of the criminal in order to get him lesser charges, get his charges dropped, or somehow get him returned to the community so he can commit more criminal acts. So mean, that's just a business that the guy ran. He's like, yeah. This is this is how you make money with this church.
You wanna buy this church property? It can really be a money making venture. And not only are you making money, you're perpetuating the cycle of violence and criminality because you're falsely testifying in favor of this criminal so he can get out and commit more crime, do more violence, keep the neighborhood in the state of relentless criminality and desperation.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Alex Jones is living proof of the Great Man theory. Every trend and force in society was against him, but the truth prevailed. Not often you get to meet someone who has changed the course of history through sheer force of will.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
This is the bottom of the rabbit hole. This is the “Great Conspiracy” https://t.co/8bNltvU32n
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to talk about something super important in the conspiracy world. It all boils down to the fear of death and the desire for immortality. This is the core of the rabbit hole, connecting Genesis to Revelation. The power elite thinks they're close to achieving immortality, changing everything.
They're trying to create a world where immortality is exclusive, used as a bribe or blackmail. Think about it: infinite life for a few requires control over the many. This is why figures like Jesus Christ taught about overcoming death spiritually. Accept death, like Miyamoto Musashi said, and you conquer its power over you. Don't buy into the idea that some should rule because they've achieved immortality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, what's up? Y'all never done a video like this. My friend Ian showed me how, so I figured I'd do it since this is, one of the most important things you can possibly understand in the, conspiracy world. See, I woke up to this guy, Brian Johnson, with this post. I'm building a religion.
Wait a second. I know what you're gonna say. That's a knee jerk reaction. He made the don't die party. Don't die becomes world's history's fastest growing ideology.
It saves the human race. And then, of course, he has, the joiner die, you know, classic Americana, piece of, patriotic propaganda. But in this case, instead of saying joiner die, just says don't die, which is interesting because that is, of course, the exact pitch of the serpent in the Garden of Eden. And this is the this is the end result of the conspiracy. This is the bottom of the rabbit hole once you've gotten to the bottom of it.
It is like a giant circle that connects the first book of the bible with the last book of the bible. It's Genesis and Revelation. It's the promise of infinite death, and it's the fact that right now, the power elite think they have the technology to live forever. And see this is tied into things like climate change as well since it's don't die human, don't die earth, don't die as a species. Yeah.
He's promising that you'll be able to live forever, and that you'll, I don't know, practically be like gods. Genesis three four, but the serpent said to the woman, you will surely not die for god knows that when you eat it, your eyes will be open, and you will be like god at knowing good and evil. This really is the key to understanding everything, and humans get this on an intrinsic, almost, like, supernatural level. If you think about all of the bad guys from all of the transcendent media media that has made its way into our subconscious, things like Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Harry Potter, What is the thing that is similar between all of the bad guys in these movies? They all are desperate to live forever.
Voldemort literally means to flee from death. Right? You've got Star Wars, Darth Vader, his whole fall had to do with the promise of how how does he put it? The tale of Darth Sidious and the powers that some would say would seem unnatural. Right?
The way Darth Vader gets seduced is through his fear of death. You fear death? Well, guess what? I have a way around it. Join me.
And instead of living, you become a half dead zombie, a robot, an automaton. Instead of gaining all the power, you become the servant of power, and your will is subsumed in the will of evil. So this really is, like, the heart of everything. And while that's sort of talking about it on a mystical, metaphysical, or or spiritual level, there's something very real going on right now, which is that the billionaires in power think they're on the cusp of or perhaps have already achieved immortality for all intents and purposes, whether that's uploading your consciousness to some sort of hard drive, some sort of cloud service so you can have a new body or antiaging technology reversing the aging process through molecular manipulation. There are a few different ways that they think that they are about to be able to live forever.
Now when you think about that, what that means is that the world has to change completely. You can't have infinite life in the world as it's set up right now because you would have infinite growth with no death, and that's unsustainable, and you can't you can't have that. So what they're doing now, everything in the world going on right now, the grand conspiracy at the heart of it is trying to set up in a world in which certain people can live forever, in which the immortality technology is granted to the people at the top, and they wield it as a bribe or blackmail to the rest of humanity saying if you serve us well enough, maybe you too can receive the infinite life technology. Because not everybody can have it, obviously. If everybody lives forever, that's just unsustainable.
It's ridiculous to just, you know, people keep being born and everybody live forever. That doesn't make any sense. You have a small amount of people who live forever, and they dangle immortality over everybody else saying, if you disobey us, we will deny this of you. So all human evil essentially all goes back to the fear of death and the desire to live forever, which is why Jesus Christ, his central his whole deal, his central thing was overcoming death and showing you that you can live for live forever spiritually by living a good life instead of doing evil to try desperately to cling to material immortality. It's like the central pillar of of Jesus' teaching in life and and the overall message of his time on earth was the defeat of death spiritually through communion and good living and and being one with god, which is funny because if you look at almost every major, again, transcendent religious figure, they all say stuff like this.
And, of course, I I always relate it back to Miyamoto Masashi who says, you know, the way of the samurai is the resolute acceptance of death. By accepting that death is a fact, a reality, and a good thing, then you overcome your fear of death. You stop trying to defeat death, and you can actually live. What Brian Johnson is doing is literally being the devil. And what the people in power right now are frantically engaged in is trying to create a world in which we accept the fact that some people achieve more immortality, live forever, and therefore get to rule over us.
Don't fall for it.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
BLM rioters got $20k checks from the government because they were put in hand-cuffs. Non-violent J6ers have been placed in solitary confinement for months on end. Pardons and settlements IMMEDIATELY. https://t.co/7c13DPVZrr
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
🇬🇧British Protests Explained🇬🇧 Kier Starmer gave the British people an ultimatum in his speech following the Southport Riots. The people are rising to the challenge. https://t.co/8CjYB3RKN1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Three children are murdered in the UK amidst tensions over immigration. The government cracks down on protests, introduces new surveillance measures, and restricts movement. The prime minister warns of preventative action against those opposing migration. The British people face a choice: accept control or resist and face consequences. The control system mirrors China's, focusing on stifling dissent rather than stopping crime. The speaker advocates for sending immigrants back as the only solution. The UK is portrayed as irreversibly changed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So 3 children get murdered after a years long conflict between the British people and its government as the British people desperately express through voting and and protest and all sorts of other things that they don't want their country swamped by violent foreigners only to have their protests shut down, their speech criminalized, their activists jailed, and their daughters stabbed. They actually decide to riot for once. The prime minister gives a speech about it, a speech in which he lays out a frightening new array of governmental powers to crack down on the native British.
Speaker 1: We will establish a national capability across police forces, shared intelligence, wider deployment of facial recognition technology, and preventative action, criminal behavior orders to restrict their movements before they could even board a train.
Speaker 0: Either allow the migration crisis to kill your children and swamp your services and overthrow your government quietly, obediently, die, or if you stand up against us, well, now we have the excuse that we need for massive surveillance and as he puts it, preventative action. The fact is the British people are now being put to a test. They are rolling out the modern western control grid in a way that's never been done before. If this control system is implemented and successful, they might as well be China. This is the Chinese control system, and then that's it.
The people of the UK, they can be systematically and deliberately replaced, and any attempt to even politically reverse it will be criminalized and shut down. At least in China, their control system at least, like, stops criminals. UK control system is there solely to stop the good people from stopping the criminals. It's all lies. Just send them back.
The only possible solution to this is to send them all back.
Speaker 1: But the
Speaker 0: UK is over forever.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m trying to piece together the Crowdstrike narrative. It starts with Hillary Clinton allegedly funneling weapons through Libya while she was Secretary of State, leading to the Benghazi incident. She used a private server for secret communications, which was destroyed, but its contents leaked, including odd references to rituals and code words. The FBI relied on Crowdstrike's claim that Russia hacked the server, clearing Clinton despite her legal breaches. This led to the Russiagate investigation against Trump. Fast forward to 2024, Trump survives an assassination attempt linked to Crowdstrike, which then causes a massive network crash. I wonder if I missed anything, especially regarding Blackrock's involvement.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
So let me see if I have this Crowdstrike story straight…. When Hillary Clinton was Sec. of State, she was illegally funneling sophisticated weapons through Libya to terrorists in the MidEast in an effort to take out Assad in Syria for Israel. When the weapons transfer went sideways and the US Ambassador was killed in Benghazi, it was discovered she was using an illegal private server for secret communications. She destroyed the server, but not before its contents were leaked by Wikileaks, including communications about bizarre occult rituals and inexplicable code words involving children and pizza. Instead of investigating the leak themselves, the FBI relied on a Crowdstrike investigation that falsely claimed the server was hacked by Russia. The FBI cleared HC despite admitting she broke the law, and launched the Russiagate investigation, using more fake Clinton campaign disinfo to tie Trump to Russia to get a FISA warrant and spy on Trump while leaking dirt to the press to undermine first his campaign, then his presidency. When Trump had a call with Zelenskyy and asked about Crowdstrike, a “whistleblower” falsely claimed quid-pro-quo and launched the first impeachment to stop Trump’s inquiries. (It was in the midst of this impeachment trial, btw, when Event 201 took place. But that’s another story.) Fast forward to 2024 and Trump is dominating Biden when he miraculously survives a deep state orchestrated assassination attempt two days before the RNC. Two days later Crowdstrike causes the biggest computer network crash in all of history, knocking millions of corporate and government systems offline for hours. Other than the fact that Blackrock owns Crowdstrike and a Blackrock affiliated investment firm placed millions of dollars betting against DJT in the hours before the assassination attempt by a shooter who was featured in a Blackrock promo, did I miss anything?
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
🧵WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH HEZBOLLAH AND ISRAEL? @Lebanon_John called in to explain what is happening, from a Lebanese perspective. You can find the full video in the link below, but I cut it up because I think each segment is powerful. 1/8 - BACKGROUND HISTORY https://t.co/IS6KkK4XnC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hezbollah was formed in 1982 by displaced Shiites in South Lebanon to resist Israel's ethnic cleansing and colonization. The conflict stems from old Lebanese towns in northern Israel, with Lebanese people seeking to reclaim them. The speaker criticizes the notion of "might makes right" and advocates for international law. Israel is portrayed as losing ground due to hostile policies and alienating neighbors. The speaker warns that the international community cannot protect Israel from Hezbollah's retaliation. Israel's actions have angered many, leading to inevitable consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what exactly is happening between, Hezbollah and and Israel in the northern part of that country? Yes. So there's a old score to settle between these two. In 1982, that's when Hezbollah was formed. And so Hezbollah was formed with by the dispossessed and displaced civilians of South Lebanon, specifically the Shiites.
And they they were poor, and no one really cared about them. And Israel just kicked them out of their towns and basically started to do, like, Israel 2.0 or Palestine 2.0, this kind of, what they call Judaization. That's their word. Don't get mad. This Judaization of the land that they, you know, ethnically cleanse.
And so they were basically just doing that again, to to South Lebanon. Many people will be familiar with the phrase, the Greater Israel Project or Erez Israel. In other words, it's just the ideology of Zionists that this land has to be, ethnically cleansed and then recolonized, you know, with with Jews. So that was happening to South Lebanon has only got formed to resist that, to liberate Lebanese land. So they have an old score to settle.
There are old Lebanese towns in what is considered the borders of modern day northern Israel. There are Lebanese people who got kicked out of those towns and want to get back in there. And so from the Lebanese point of view, just because some European guy in 1948, you know, put this country on top of this existing area, you know, everyone says might makes right. What is that what does all the pro Israel crowd say? Well, fuck around and find out.
Well, guys, fuck around and find out. Guess what? Hey. Trying to trying to curse, John. Oh.
And, Darren, good. You're you're good. You're good. Screw around and hold it. We got you.
We got you. Yes. And so, guys, might makes right is dumb. Like, obviously, we want international law. Like, people gotta wake up and kinda, like, realize where they're at.
You can't be advocating for illegal stuff because, obviously, that's gonna come back on us. So right now, this is the swinging of the pendulum back the other way. Looks like Israel is gonna lose this round. You know, it's not looking good for Israel as though it has the upper hand. And so, yeah, it was just this was the inevitable result of these hostile policies to their neighbors thinking they have carte blanche, thinking that the international community would protect them.
Guys, how can the international community protect them from Hezbollah? That's the whole thing. They can't. America can't protect them from Hezbollah. Nobody can.
So they they basically shouldn't have treated people like this, and now they're gonna have to suffer because they made everybody mad at them. You know?
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
188 years ago today, the Defenders of the Alamo made the ultimate sacrifice to free Texas from tyranny. Read this essay I wrote for @mansworldmag_ to understand why it's important to honor their memory, and why the Left is so desperate to tear down this monument to Liberty. https://t.co/J4Q0ysQGCZ
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
welp it was fun getting paid by X while it lasted. https://t.co/LPDftT4uJo
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
“What is wrong with these people and how are there so many of them?” 🤔🤣 This was a very fun conversation with @nicksortor about gay frogs, suicidal shrimp, and the fundamental insanity of liberalism. https://t.co/WSiuOlDVdB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Liberals are more likely to have poor mental health, with a linear correlation between left-leaning views and mental health issues. The discussion delves into the impact of antidepressants in the water on wildlife, such as shrimp exhibiting suicidal behavior. The speakers express concern over the emotional-driven decision-making of liberals and question the origins of their behavior. The conversation highlights the need to address the attachment to reality and maturity in contending with it. Overall, the discussion revolves around the perceived irrationality of liberals and the impact of mental health on political beliefs.
Translation: The discussion focuses on the correlation between liberal views and mental health issues, as well as the impact of antidepressants in water on wildlife behavior. The speakers question the emotional decision-making of liberals and ponder the origins of their behavior. They emphasize the importance of facing reality maturely. The conversation centers on the perceived irrationality of liberals and the influence of mental health on political beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The more liberal you are, the more likely you are to have poor mental health. And so it's, goes from very liberal over on the left to very conservative over on the right. And this is standardized 2 item mental health index, but, I mean, it is literally linear. I mean, it's it's the more left you are, the more likely you are to have some sort of mental health problem. Is it this sort of a chicken in the egg thing, isn't it?
Are you more left because you're crazy, or are you driven crazy because you're more on the left? Any guess on that?
Speaker 1: I wanna pull from the audience to find out who is exactly surprised by any of this because I guarantee you that number is very, very low. So, I mean, this was so predictable. It's it's it's crazy. And especially, you know, I I wanna know when it comes to medications and stuff too. Like, all these SSRIs and stuff that people are, you know, they prescribed this medication like candy now.
How much of that is, you know, even even making people go further left on that spectrum based on their craziness.
Speaker 0: I I don't know. Sort of another, like, you know, the chicken and the egg thing. Like, well, are we prescribing more because people are crazy, or are we prescribing psychotropic drugs to people that don't need it and driving our bodies now that our waste, when it's flushed into the ocean, makes shrimp kill themselves. Right? I don't know if you've ever heard that story.
Yeah. The it it there's a story out of England, but it's happened all over the place where the human waste is dumped into the ocean. The the just from our waste, the sheer amount of, like, antidepressants that are in the water get absorbed by shrimp and they stop, protecting themselves. They'll start they'll swim right up to predators. It's like something blocks the self preservation instinct in the shrimp.
Selective serotonin re uptake uptaters in suicidal behavior, a population based cohort study. So, I mean, when you when we say that we're being driven towards civilizational suicide and that the people on the left are in a suicide cult, it's not even a joke. It is a lack of self preservation and that's so powerful now. It it's seeping into the the wildlife. So, yeah, I think, I mean, we're in a suicide cult.
The left is a suicide cult.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And, you know, that's it's crazy to me to think that, that this study is just now coming out. I mean, I feel like we've known this for years years, but the science tends to quote unquote the science ends up being cherry picked, and they they block this stuff from coming out. Finally, we have something to actually confirm something all of us knew for years.
Speaker 0: Yeah. There's the story all the way back in 2010. So just imagine, you know, a decade and a half of advancement since then. Antidepressants in the water are making shrimp suicidal. So the frogs are gay, the shrimp are suicidal.
It's, it's all going down, folks. And I mean, is this it seems pretty obvious to me. It's about attachment to reality. I mean, that that sort of is at the heart of of mental illness is, can you contend with reality or not? And it seems like the less you're able to actually just deal responsibly and and, I don't know, maturely with reality, the less insane you are and the more conservative you are.
It's just about recognizing and contending with reality at the end of the day.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, you gotta think the liberals at this point only think with their emotions. There is no other you know, they don't take in any other factors into account. It's how they feel that day. And, you know, that I I think that's why you know, you see you just saw this the the one of the most famous videos.
It's a beautiful video. When Trump was being inaugurated, and you have this woman screaming. I mean, you know, it's it's like, what is she on? What is Right. Right.
With these people? Why are there so many of them? And why can I look at somebody like that and immediately know that it's a liberal? Every single time.
Speaker 0: I think you just summed up, our shows. What is wrong with these people, and how are there so many of them? I mean, that that Where
Speaker 1: are they coming from? This is the question we need to answer. The damn water again.
Speaker 0: Seriously. Where are they coming from? How are there so many of them? I if we can answer that question, we could solve a lot of a heck of a lot of problems.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Just WHY, @EdKrassen ?? https://t.co/x8KDGALUIT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ed defends Joe Biden against accusations related to Ashley Biden's diary. The diary's legitimacy is questioned, with controversial entries mentioned. Ed argues about the appropriateness of a father showering with his daughter, citing age guidelines. The conversation highlights concerns about the content of Ed's video and his motives. Ultimately, there is confusion and discomfort over the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, Ed's going to bat. He's going to bat for Joe Biden. He's on the warpath. He's having arguments on Twitter.
Speaker 1: Yes. Those who stole and sold Ashley Biden's diary should be held liable. No. Ashley Biden's diary has not been confirmed for legitimacy.
Speaker 2: Hold on. Well, hold on. Hold on. Oh, boy. If the diary wasn't real, then it wasn't stolen.
If the diary was stolen, then it's real. What do you what are we doing here, Ed? What is this?
Speaker 1: Quote, showers with my dad, probably not appropriate.
Speaker 2: Uh-huh. End quote.
Speaker 1: Yep. That's what it says.
Speaker 2: And your instinct is to defend the man. This out to be, oh, Joe Biden molested her. She does say, quote, was I molested? I think so. So there is that, Ed.
You chose to ignore that. I again, I have to ask why. Why are you making this video? Why would you not include that part? Because it directly contradicts the point you're trying to make?
Then maybe you shouldn't be making that point, Ed.
Speaker 1: Some of you might say it is never appropriate for a father to be in the same shower with it with their daughter.
Speaker 2: That's not the argument.
Speaker 1: No. If you ask if you ask most pediatricians or child psychologists, they'll probably say somewhere between the age of 35, it is no longer appropriate Mhmm. For a father to be in the same shower.
Speaker 2: Why are you making this argument, Ed?
Speaker 1: We don't know how old Ashley Biden was when she, quote, took showers with her father. Old enough to remember.
Speaker 2: Old, yeah, old enough to remember, you know, the parts that her brain hasn't blocked out in a trauma response. It's weird. It's very weird. Why would he make this? I legitimately don't understand.
And Ed's a good dude. Okay. If you say so. Why is he doing this? Is he like I mean but if she's under 3, isn't that fine?
I don't understand what's compelling you, Ed. I wanna delete that video before more people see it.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
EAGLE 2: Leaked Top Secret doc reveals how the Deep State was formed. https://t.co/xYx8wTvPEA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Eagle 2 document reveals a plan by the CIA to engage in drug smuggling to fund operations without congressional knowledge. Key figures involved were Lansdale, Colby, Bush, Armitage, and Ferreira. Colby initiated the Phoenix program, resulting in thousands of executions. The operation was halted, and a new money-making scheme was started with the Rothschild Empire's involvement. This illustrates how the deep state operates internationally, controlled by shadow figures outside official CIA channels to avoid scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's this document I call the eagle 2 document. It purports to be from the Federal Bureau of Investigation to senator Edward Kennedy, classification top secret written on July 7th 1989. During the tenure of Richard Helms as director of the Central Intelligence Agency, decisions were made by the director with implied approval of the Oval Office to draft a blueprint and put into motion a plan by which the CIA could have as much funds as and when needed without the knowledge of congress. The 5 experts picked were Edward Lansdale, who ran the CIA activities in Vietnam, William Colby, who was put in total command of the blueprint operation when enacted, George Bush, who asked to receive approval to have his top aide, Richard Armitage, to be brought aboard, and lieutenant colonel Robert Ferreira, a top CIA asset, the master plan called for the CIA to enter into the drug smuggling business in total and complete fashion. General Lansdale would handle all the distribution network collection services within the military in Vietnam.
See, this is while veterans came back addicted to heroin because they were sold it by the CIA. The operation was given the name Eagle 2. Here's where it gets crazy folks. Before the operation was really off the ground, Colby started his phase of elimination of dissidents, and he did so under the code name of the phoenix program. Kolby became insane with his power.
And before he was finished with phoenix, over 20,000 suspects were executed, and over 2,500 US citizens were accused by Colby of being collaborators, and they vanished. That was too close to all being made public, so Helms, who in the meantime had formed a totally strong relationship with Baron Philip du Daphne, who represented the real capital of of the world, the Rothschild Empire, decided to stop operation equal 2 and start another clandestine money making operation and leave Japan. Baron du Daphne, by the way of information, later took complete control of the international organization, the organization, for economic cooperation and development, headquartered in Paris, France. So this is how the deep state works. This is how it was formed.
This is what we mean when we talk about the intelligence community being international, it being co opted and actually controlled by people that aren't technically in office of CIA. They're shadow controllers. If you're a guy and your wife manages all of the money, how are you gonna cheat on her? How are you gonna go have a nice steak dinner with your mistress if your wife's gonna gonna start asking questions about the $200 bill on the next credit card statement? What you need to do is go do a little something on the side to get some cash of your own so you can pay for your nefarious activities outside of the oversight of the money manager.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Read it for yourself here: https://www.offlimits.news/post/eagle-ii-a-secret-history-of-the-deep-state
reSee.it AI Summary
The government is providing extensive benefits to illegal immigrants, including monthly cash payments, rent coverage, groceries, maid and laundry services, air travel, childcare, healthcare, and community events. This raises questions about the fairness and excessiveness of these benefits, especially when many hardworking Americans struggle to afford such luxuries. Sources: The Gateway Pundit, The Washington Times, Bloomberg.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
What if, instead of taxing you, the government gave you $1400 cash every month? What if it paid your rent (up to $9000/mo)? And bought your groceries? And paid for a maid and laundry service? What if it paid for your air travel? What if it offered free baby sitters, free daycare and preschool? What if they paid for all your healthcare, including hospitals and dentists? What if it held community events where all the kids in the neighborhood got to go on free field trips? What if it was pouring billions of dollars into improving the infrastructure in your neighborhood? Because they are doing all of this and more for illegal immigrants. And I'm not just saying "What if" rhetorically. Really think about how your life would be if you got all that shit. It's excessive, honestly. But this is how the government is treating total foreigners who have never contributed a day's work to this country. All because they downloaded an app and clicked the "I'm claiming asylum" button. 90% of Americans will work their ass off all week to pay for this, and we still have to do our own laundry. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/look-crazy-list-things-illegal-immigrants-get-free/ https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/nov/6/feds-paid-room-service-laundry-and-babysitters-ill/ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-09/nyc-migrants-how-nyc-is-finding-housing-and-what-it-costs?embedded-checkout=true
Look at the Crazy List of Things Illegal Immigrants Get for 'FREE' in Liberal Massachusetts | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance
Liberal Massachusetts is overrun with illegal border crossers and there’s really no wonder why when you see the laundry list of things that are provided for ‘free’ courtesy of taxpayers in the Bay State.
thegatewaypundit.com
Feds paid for room service, laundry and babysitters for illegal immigrants kept at hotels
Homeland Security not only put illegal immigrant families up in hotels at taxpayer expense but the contract it signed insisted they be given five-star treatment with laundry service, their choice of mattresses and guards -- not to keep them in, but to keep others out.
washingtontimes.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Israelis successfully pressured for the firing of the President of Harvard. Media portrayed it as Conservatives attacking a Black Woman over DEI. Israelis also pushed for the ban of TikTok, which will impact American youth. This pattern of external and internal issues is frustrating, resembling an endlessly repeating fractal pattern.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Israelis wanted the President of Harvard fired, so she was. Then the media said it was Conservatives attacking a Black Woman over DEI. Israelis wanted TikTok banned, so it will be. And America’s young people will be told Republicans got their favorite app deleted and made their favorite influencers go broke. It’s bad enough when America takes flak because of Israel, but then we are being screwed over internally as well. It’s like a fugue, or an endlessly repeating fractal pattern. No matter how much you zoom in or out, it looks exactly the same.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
> Use HAARP to heat ionosphere > Hot air rises, creates atmospheric bubble > Shut off HAARP > Bubble pops, atmosphere crashes back to earth > Earth convulses under change in pressure https://t.co/BGrcg73jTe
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
🚨🇨🇳 Xinjiang, China - Earthquake Holy crap - here we go again…… Hundreds of local residents in China reporting seeing this strange red glow in the sky right before a 5.8 magnitude Earthquake hit the region. Truth is stranger than fiction https://t.co/F2e1Q4CxJT
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Climate Change Pitch Meeting https://t.co/6KsgJbZXme
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's hot, feels like the end of the world due to climate change. Blame for carbon dioxide production leads to extreme restrictions. Power plants switch to burning trees for fuel, windmills and solar panels have limitations. Plans for all cars to be electric, no meat consumption, and restricted travel zones. Environmental concerns now solely focused on carbon neutrality. Urgent actions include blocking out the sun with metal particles. The speaker is determined to enforce drastic changes, even if it means extreme measures like disrupting traffic or blocking ambulances. No children allowed in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's kinda feels hot. You feel hot? Yeah. Yeah. It's, you know, pretty warm.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think, we're all gonna die. I think this is it. The world's being destroyed. What?
Yep. This is it. End of the world. The apocalypse. Armageddon.
I'd say we have, oof, geez, 3 weeks left to turn this thing around. The worst part is it's all your fault. I can't believe you've done this. What how is this my fault? Well, you produce carbon dioxide, and there's way too much of that stuff.
Too much? Yeah. How much is there? How much is too much? Look.
I don't even know. I'm not here to understand vague, pseudo scientific talking points. I'm here to enforce insane restrictions on the basis of those talking points. Restrictions. Yeah.
You know, like, carbon credits and no gas stove, and you have to eat bugs, and live in a tiny box like a bug, and, enter bloodline, you know, no children or anything like a like a bug. Okay? That is insane. Yeah. Well, it's a crisis, a climate crisis, so we don't have time to think about this stuff.
We're saving the earth. From what? Well, from people. Yeah. Like other people.
Not like you and me, but like, you know, people, humans. So you want to eliminate humans. Well, it's not quite that simple. Yeah. I feel like that should be a hard no.
Well, no. See, it's it's math. We have this equation, and we're trying to get this number down to 0. And one of those variables is people. Yeah.
That's right. We're trying to reach 0 by multiplying these non zero numbers by whatever the value of people is. We call it net zero. Okay. Because people produce carbon dioxide by existing.
Right. So it's all about switching energy production to carbon neutral sources. Alright. And also not breathing or eating. I'm sorry.
What? Great news. We're making big progress. The oldest and largest power plant in all of England just went 24 hours totally carbon neutral. They didn't burn a single ounce of coal all day.
And what did they burn instead? Biomass. What is biomass? Trees. Big beautiful trees from across the ocean.
See, we cut them down at British Columbia, ship them across the Atlantic, and burn them for fuel. Wait. So just because you don't burn coal, you're calling that zero emission? Well, the banks do. Yeah.
The banks. They're the bank. The bankers, the international bankers, they're in charge of all of this because they're so selfless and caring. Okay. And they're making us give up combustion fuel.
Well, not totally. Just like natural gas and coal and stuff like that. Yeah. But not trees. No.
Not trees. Trees are fine. Alright. That's crazy. Isn't there any other power generator source?
Like, what about windmills? Oh, yeah. Windmills are great. Yeah. After, like, 18 years, they're carbon neutral for a couple years.
Plus, when they freeze, you can just keep them spinning with the diesel engine. Also, they kill a ton of eagles. Is that a good thing? I guess not. But we're saving the earth here.
You can't make omelettes without breaking a few eggs, and you can't build windmills without killing a ton of eagles and whales and chopping down 2,000,000 trees in Scotland. Okay. Wait. So you're burning trees for fuel, but you're also cutting down entire forests to make fields to build windmills? That's right.
And also, we're just chopping down trees and tread up burying them in the ground. It's a it's a new initiative. I hate trees. Don't trees, like, absorb carbon dioxide? No.
That's what my giant vacuum machine is for. It's huge. Okay. This is this is getting weird. Windmills.
Windmills work, though. Yeah. Windmills work great unless there's, you know, too much wind. Okay. What about solar panels?
Solar panels also fantastic unless there's, you know, too much sun. Alright. What about nuclear energy? No. Alright.
Well well, what about cars? I mean, cars run on gasoline. So what about them? Actually, every car is gonna be electric from now on. Can the power grid handle that, every car being electric?
No. No. So, I don't get it. How are people gonna drive? How are you gonna drive when you don't own a car?
What do you mean I won't own a car? I mean, how will I get anywhere? That's easy. Everybody will share a small amount of cars. You'll have an app like Uber where you can request a ride and also apply for a transit permit to leave the 15 minute perimeter.
What 15 minute perimeter? Yeah. The one I'm gonna put around you, it's called an ultra low emission zone. It's a core aspect of the sustainability development goals. It's where you can't leave your neighborhood and don't own a car and never fly and can't eat meat.
Look. You're never gonna get these laws passed. No. They'll pass, Just, not through law. No.
I'm just gonna sort of do it. See, I don't have to pass a law to make beef illegal. I'll just buy the cattle farms and shut them down. See, I, control the market with my incredible wealth. You control the market?
That's right. So are you the one that offshored all of our manufacturing to China? Yeah. That was me. China, where there's no environmental controls at all, the number one polluter on earth?
No. No. That can't be right. No. No way.
That would be that would be crazy. Okay. Look. I'm an environmentalist, but can't we just do normal things like animal preservations, nature reserves, recycling? No.
No. No. That's not how environmentalism works anymore. From now on, all environmental or ecological concern will be subsumed within the climate change carbon neutral agenda. See, Carbon is responsible for everything, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, pandemics, heart attacks, mass immigration, teenage mental health.
I mean, do you have any idea how traumatizing it is for a child to constantly be told that the earth itself is dying and that it's their fault? Okay. So why do you keep doing it? Because the time is now. What?
Because earth can't wait. What's happening here? Because we will be the generation of change. Are you just saying slogans at me? Climate change is racist.
Okay. I don't understand what's happening here. That's fine. You don't need to understand. You just eat your bugs.
My engineers are hard at work spraying metal particles into the air to block out the sun. Please don't do that. Look. This is an emergency. I don't have time to stand here and argue with you about my asinine weather modification programs.
The fact is it's happening. Your pipeline is shut down. Your backyard garden is illegal, and your water is filled with microplastics, which I put in there because I'm into that sort of thing. So the fact is this is happening. You're helping me, or I swear to God I will throw soup all over the museum what I will glue my hand to the ground right here right now I'll block the traffic I mean, a blocked ambulance is a small price to pay to insist that the government do something it's already doing to a suicidal degree.
You know what? Fine. It's fine. Great. Because, I gotta go.
Catch a helicopter to the airport. Me and John Kerry are gonna race our private jets across the ocean for fun. Alright. I'll see you later. By the way, no children.
No bloodline. Bloodline's over. No children.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Am I missing something here, or do Jews get interest-free home loans from @RocketMortgage? https://t.co/UUgq1a6Us5
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Feminism was always a lie. https://t.co/v6vovwyZin
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former Cosmo writer reveals how the magazine deceived women to promote feminism. Despite writing articles about the benefits of being single and independent, the writer and her colleagues were actually happily married with children. They encouraged readers to pursue a glamorous and progressive lifestyle, but in reality, they prioritized their own families. The writer criticizes the magazine for promoting a lifestyle that they themselves did not live.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Former Cosmo writer dishes on how the magazine lied to women to sell feminism. See, throughout this article, she talks about how she didn't believe anything she was writing. She's like, here we are, writing story after story about how great it is to be single, how you don't need a man, how women should focus on their career. Meanwhile, everybody at the magazine, herself included, got married young, had kids, were very happy with their husbands, and yet they're writing article after article after article encouraging all of the things they don't do. If you wanna be cool, old.
You wanna be glamorous and progressive and sexy? Just waste your life away. Just spend the most important years of your life flitting from one meaningless contact to the next, making money for some bigwig in New York. Sex in attached to the next, making money for some bigwig in New York. Sex in the City.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
I did a line-by-line breakdown of @KariLake's leaked conversation on American Journal this morning. A true peak behind the curtain. https://t.co/XAmfemygfK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Powerful individuals attempt to bribe and threaten Arizona Senate candidate Kary Lake to stay out of politics for two years. The conversation, recorded by Lake, reveals the GOP chair from the East Coast offering her a no-show job and a position as a talking head on Fox News. The chair implies that the cartel operates in all 50 states, potentially insinuating a threat against Lake's life. The audio exposes high-level corruption within the Republican Party and highlights the lack of coverage from left-wing media outlets. Lake vows to continue her political activism and protect the interests of the people of Arizona.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are very powerful people that wanna keep you out. I know. They do. But they're willing to put their money where their mouth is in a big way. So this conversation never happened.
Speaker 1: This is crazy, though. They should want me. I'm a great candidate. People love me. These people are corrupt.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe you're right.
Speaker 1: They are right. They are corrupt.
Speaker 0: Maybe you're right. They're right. Don't don't go. If you ever go, I'll get my son to this. If you say no, that's just fine.
It's your choice. Don't tell people. I know.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have try to have me murdered.
Speaker 0: Like, half of people. Mhmm. While other networks
Speaker 2: lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Info wars.comforward/go.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We gotta start with this video, and we're gonna have to carry this into the next segment as well Do the commercial break because I'm gonna have to pause this because we're gonna study this tape. We're gonna study this tape like we're a football team after, You know, just losing a game, we're gonna have to go through piece by piece, play by play, and determine what exactly is going on here. Like I said before, this is like receiving the enemy dispatches or breaking the enemy's code And having the battle plan of corruption laid out before us. It's undercover audio recorded by Carrie Lake of an attempt To bribe her into sitting out the next 2 years of politics, which I'm glad.
Yeah. I mean, you you see you can hear Carrie Lake in this video. You can hear how much she is The real deal. And I and I'm sure she does, and I hope she does wear this as a badge of honor, That they would be so scared of her political activism that they would be willing to offer anything to her. Just get her to sit out for a little while, You'll hear the offers here.
So the audio, the video, the article can be found at infowars.com. Bombshell audio reveals top republican official Attempts to bribe at Kary Lake. Let's go now to this video clip number 15. And again, we'll we'll pause and sort of dissect this as we go. Here's the audio.
Speaker 1: So what's going on? What is I'm assuming this is our friend.
Speaker 0: This is this is this is back east. They there are very powerful people who wanna keep you out. I know. They do. But they're willing to put their money where their mouth is in a big way.
So, scam tips you never
Speaker 1: have. This is crazy, though. They should want me. I'm a great candidate. People love me.
These people are corrupt.
Speaker 0: Well, maybe you're right.
Speaker 1: They are corrupt. They are corrupt.
Speaker 0: They're corrupt. They're corrupt. Don't go. If you ever go, I'll get my son a choke. This, If you say no, that's just fine.
It's your choice. Don't tell people.
Speaker 1: I don't know. They're gonna have try to have me murdered.
Speaker 3: Peace world, man.
Speaker 0: It's that stuff that came out last week. It's right about the cartel stuff, man. I the cartel is operating in 50 states right now, like, half of them. Mhmm. So So what what what's going on?
Who is Hold on.
Speaker 3: Wait. That that part was strange. That part was very strange. Just pause it. And to rewind it a little bit.
So just to get off the bat, I mean, this is almost cartoonish. I mean, this is like Sounds like a a bad Hollywood movie where they're using these sort of vague terms, almost like a a mafia member who thinks he might be recorded. Because he doesn't say, my friend, Jeff from Washington DC, he says, very powerful people back east. This comes from back east. That's Washington DC or New York City.
Right? Powerful people wanna keep you out, And they're willing to put their money where their mouth is. K. So that's a threat. Right?
That's a threat against Kary Lake. It's also an offer of a bribe. So that's one of the ways they do this. They go, not only you know, if you resist us, not only will It'd be very bad for you. You might get hurt if you resist us.
But if you go with us, you'll actually be rewarded. It's almost the classic, you know, 300 Spartan bribe. Right? Where it's like, look, if you resist us, we're gonna crush you. We're gonna go to war with you.
We're gonna enslave your sons and rape your wives, and we're gonna win anyway. Or you can go along with us. You can surrender to us outright, and you'll be rewarded. You'll be made a king amongst even more people. You personally will be powerful And important and respected.
So it's not enough to have the carrot. You have to have the stick as well or vice versa. Again, this is just the the method by which this is carried out. But that was a very interesting exchange to me. She says, they're gonna have to kill me or they're gonna want to kill me or something like that.
And his response to that is, Well, you know the cartel is operating in all 50 states. Is that a threat? Like, is that a death threat? Is that a showing of the hand? Is that a little well, if they wanted to kill you, guess what?
There's foreign operatives, gang members, And assassins in all 50 states, they can get you anywhere. Was that a threat? I mean, I'm maybe I'm reading too much into this, but I haven't seen any other articles Point this out. She says, they're gonna try to kill me, and his response is, well, you know, there's cartel members in all 50 states. Am I reading too much into that?
You tell me. Let's take it back about 10 seconds and roll that again.
Speaker 0: If you if you say no, it's just fine. It's your choice. No.
Speaker 3: It's fine. It's
Speaker 0: fine. Don't tell if you're Joyce. I know.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have try to have me murdered.
Speaker 0: Not not either.
Speaker 3: States world, man.
Speaker 0: It's that stuff that came out last week is right about the cartel stuff, man. I I think the cartel is operating in 50 states right now, like, all 50. Mhmm. So So what what what's going on? Who is it?
What?
Speaker 3: Yeah. That was very weird. Alright. Let me just tell you what. I haven't seen any articles point that part out because that exchange doesn't make any sense.
She says they're gonna Try to kill me. And he says, yeah. Well, you know, if that stuff's right about the cartel being in all 50 states. That's insane. And, of course, we We just covered the story from AP.
Mexico demands investigation into US military grade weapons used by the cartels. So we know our government. The East State is in bed with the cartels in a very real way, and here you've got somebody from back east threatening. With a lot of stories, I I often make the comment, well, we can spend the whole show on this story. We might spend the whole show on this 5 minute tape that Carrie Lake presented.
Not only is it a inside view into how corruption Actually works. But then you can put it in context of how it's being covered, who's covering it, who's talking about it, what The sides are in this conflict. Who are the people back east that are attempting to stymie and stifle A populist Republican uprising because they're not Democrats, they're Republicans. So let's let's lay the groundwork here. The Stories at infowars.com, Carrie Lake demands resignation of corrupt GOP chair caught trying to bribe her.
So this is Arizona senate candidate, Carrie Lake, and the person she's talking to is the state's GOP chair, Jeff DeWitt. So this isn't a Democrat trying to do this. This is a Republican speaking on behalf of powerful Republicans from the East Coast. There's a recording that emerged of him trying to bribe Lake to stay out of politics for 2 years. Obviously, Infowars is covering this.
Obviously, Gateway Pundit. All of the right wing stalwarts are covering this in a very appropriate way. Although, I think I'm the for I haven't seen any articles that point out that Jeff DeWitt, I'm pretty sure, just threatened to use the cartel to assassinate Carrie Lake. I'm pretty sure that's what I just heard. Now the beautiful thing about waging an information war is that They can't do that anymore.
If it it doesn't even matter. If Kary Lake is killed and they've tried to spin the story as, Well, Carrie Lake was standing up against the cartel, so they had her wet. I said no one's gonna buy it anymore. We just heard the recording Of the GOP democrat or the GOP republican chair committee chair, the chair of the state of Arizona Obliquely threatened Kary Lake with the cartel. So now that that's out, now that that audio is Spread and on a 1000000 different computers at this moment and will never go away, well, that option's off the table.
Back east, Where they're game planning how to stifle and destroy the American MAGA movement, they've had to remove that card from the board. They've had to remove that Option from the table. So in a way, by talking about this, by Kary Lake recording and publicizing this conversation, she has At least protected herself and precluded her enemies from using that particular weapon against her. Because we all know now, If something happens and the cartel takes out Carrie Lake, we know who is really behind it. So by waging this information war, she has, in fact, Provided a very powerful defense against actual violence against her.
That's just my reading. And, again, I haven't seen anybody else report that, But I can't figure out why else he brought up the cartel as a response to her saying they might kill me. Okay? That's one thing. The other thing is if you search this on Google I just searched Jeff DeWitt, it's the guy's name, on Google, Went to the news tab.
You see Daily Mail reporting this. Daily Mail does seem to be probably the only media outlet in the world that is just, like, actually Unbiased? Like, they report everything from everybody? Like, they'll they'll report socialist stuff. They'll report conservative stuff.
They just report stuff. I mean, Daily Mail is, like, Gotta be for that reason alone, one of those trustworthy outlets available. But Daily Mail reports it, audio recording reveals the moment the senior Republican figure tried to buy bribe Carrie Lake not to run for senate. Just straight up. Here's what happened.
Dehill reports on this. Right? It's the again, somewhat Moderate. They do carry stories from both sides, but they always focus on politics, and it's not a widely read publication by the mainstream public. Carrie Lake calls on Arizona GOP chair to resign after reports of leaked audio.
So a less honest portrayal of the situation from the hill. Dana Mills says it correctly. Audio recording reveals the moment. GOP chair tried to bribe Kary Lake, like that's what actually happened. The way the Hill reports it is There are reports of a leaked audio.
Well, no, there's leaked audio. You can listen to it. They don't say that. They say, after reports of a leaked audio, Carrie Lake calls on Arizona GOP, figure to resign. So they're putting the impetus on her and making it about Sorry about her calling on the chair to resign as if she's some disruptive force.
The story is that they tried to bribe and threaten her. Okay? And we're gonna go back to this recording. Don't worry. But what I'm illustrating here is I don't see CNN.
I don't see Washington Post. I don't see New York Times. I don't see any other leftist outlet discussing this. Washington Examiner is a right wing outlet, and it covers it Accurately. Daily Mail again.
You've got local papers like the AZ, Arizona Central, But still, they are dishonest about it. An hour ago, Kary Lake stands up to the deep state? No. Just GOP chair Jeff DeWitt. Oh, as if the head of the GOP can't be a part of the deep state.
So they don't even discuss it honestly. But you've got local news. You've got international news like the Daily Mail. You've got right wing pundits like, the Washington Examiner, But no national leftist, left wing publications. In fact, at the bottom of this page, before CNN, before anybody else, Newsweek, New York Post, New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, none of them have touched this.
Before that, you get, Sportskeedia, whatever that is. So they're higher up on the response list because they're actually covering it when nobody else is. Why is that important to point out? Because it shatters the illusionary paradigm of left versus right, republican versus democrat. If this was if that was a real divide, if the People at the top running the leftist newspapers were actually doing everything they could to undercut, undermine, and combat the Republican party in the country, they would be jumping on this story, jumping on it.
They would be using this to illustrate the fractiousness of the Republicans. Republicans can't be trusted. They're they're but they don't touch it because they understand What's happening here? Because they actually are on the side of not Kary Lake, but of the GOP big money bosses From the east, from back east. So, again, lack of evidence in this case is evidence.
Right. Because they're not talking about this bombshell story with the recorded audio proof, I think it tells you What the real divide is. It's not left versus right. It's not republican versus democrat. It's the people that run the media and the corporations and the National political parties and everybody else, all the regular people and the representatives who actually try to advocate for them.
And, actually, the bottom of the Infowars article has a interesting note on this as well as it has the shot in chaser Of back in March of 2023, a senior Washington correspondent for the Independent named Eric Garcia Wrote an article that said Kari Lake spins tail of attempted bribery to drop out of politics. But she's spinning a Hale, she's a liar. She's deceptive. She's manipulative. She's another Trumpian dictator in making cult leader, But now there's proof.
Now there's literal proof that you can hear beyond any reasonable or even unreasonable doubt. That's actually what happened. They're gonna retract it. Are they gonna go back and say, gee. She may have been telling the truth back then.
Maybe I should apologize for casting doubt on what turned out to be a very true story. Of course not. Of course, they're not gonna do that. Can we skip this break? Because I want to, I just wanna keep going into this video.
We're only about a minute into it, and so it's a 5 minute, audio recording. So we're gonna get back into this video And just chug on through. So, again, already in the first minute, we've discovered, not only the method by which they try to influence people by Offering both the kit the stick and the carrot, go with us, and your way will be paved with gold. Go against us, and you'll be destroyed. By the way, you heard that the cartel is operating in all 50 states these days?
Gee, isn't that crazy? So I think we've uncovered a a Very oblique threat against Carrie Lake that she herself kinda missed during the conversation. You can kinda hear. She's like, well, they're gonna to kill me. And he's like, well, you know, have you heard?
The cartel's operating in all 50 states. And she's like, okay. So what what is this about the bribe? Like, what what are you she, like, doesn't understand. She thinks he's changing the topic.
She's like, alright. Can we get back to the topic now? Well, he's still on topic. Are we gonna be able to just give this break? I can't remember if we can do that.
Alright. Roger that. Okay. So let's go back to this video. Kary Lake, once again, we are decoding the enemy transmission and figuring out exactly how this and how we can guard against it and trying to hear the unspoken in between the lines.
We go back now to this bombshell audio of Kary Lake and the GOP head. I hear the, commercials running.
Speaker 0: I just say there are people calling around saying, gosh, no, they can't be done. They're being done. They say, no, don't. They say,
Speaker 3: I got offered to buy out. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Don't say We'll lose our ability to get things done other in the future.
Speaker 1: Here's the split.
Speaker 3: Alright. Again, we gotta pause it there. We I mean, we're gonna pause it every line here. So he's very concerned that Xi is going to tell people about what he's doing here. And he doesn't phrase it as a threat or a bribe.
He phrases it as being a team player. Hey. If you tell people about this, it's gonna make it hard for us to get things done. Us Republicans, We wanna get things done. If you're out there telling people about this, that's gonna mess up what you wanna do.
So for your own sake, for your own agenda, Don't go out there telling people I'm here trying to bribe and threaten you with the cartels. Okay? Be a team player. Alright? So that's that's kind of the third Method, he's employed.
The carrot, the stick, and the be a team player model of of coercion. Back to the video.
Speaker 0: Say, let's work with her. She's a great candidate
Speaker 1: because they don't own me, and it pisses me off.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's not about ownership. It's about control. I don't know it's about control. It's about being on the team.
I guess that's
Speaker 1: They wanna be on the team.
Speaker 0: They want you to be on their team.
Speaker 1: They want their team. You know? But if they're pushing a globalist agenda, I can't do that. So So what do they want? What do they want me to do?
Speaker 0: You want to stay opportunists. But let me tell you what I can offer you. But, I said you can do everything else Talking ahead, isn't it? So the ask of me was it's kind of a so the the ask I got today from back east was, This is he's hesitant for us. Is there any companies out there, something that could just put her on the payroll and give her to keep her out?
And I said, Well, what do you want them to do? Whatever he needs to do.
Speaker 1: This is about defeating Trump. And I think that's a bad, bad thing for our country. DeSantis is not America first. This is about the final Death blow to Trump. And I don't think that's good for our country.
Speaker 0: So let's go ahead and pause
Speaker 3: it there because there's there's a lot of stuff happening so far. Obviously, Carrie Lake has their numbers. She understands exactly what this is about. So what we're seeing here is the GOP brass from back east. Again, that can mean New York City.
It can mean Washington DC. What it means is the power brokers are acting like a mafia. They are a mafia. This straight up sounds like a conversation from The Sopranos. It really does.
I can get you a no show job. What they're describing there is a no show job or a no work job where we'll put you on the payroll, so it'll all be legit. It'll all be by the numbers. You know? And they'll be able to say bribing you because you'll you'll have a job that, you know, you just have to, once a month, check into a Zoom call, and then we'll Pay you a $1,000,000 a year.
They're bribing her to stay out, which she which he phrases as be on the team. We want you to be on the team. This is Stupid. Right? This is stupid to to even phrase it like that.
We want you to be on the team by staying out of politics for 2 years. And, again, she has a funny kind of response to that where she's like, why don't they on my team? Like, she's like, okay. Yeah. We can be on the same team, my team.
And he he's like, no. You don't understand. When I say they want you on the team, they want you working for them by dropping out and becoming a talking head. So basically, he offers her, You can be a talking head. You can get paid for appearances on Fox News.
And, again, this tells you what they fear. Obviously, they fear The information that we spread, they they fear this type of information getting out. They fear people watching videos like this and understanding how politics really operates in this country. The information Does cause them fear. But way more than that, they fear political participation.
To them, It's worth it to pay Kari Lake 1,000,000 of dollars to simply go on Fox News and talk. That doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. But she's a senator. If she's got voting powers, if she's got subpoena power, if she's on committees, She's a senator in the United States government.
Well, now they have a problem. So, again, this is this is What we're learning by the way that they're acting, taking their actions and trying to determine their motivation behind them. So the motivation for them is not to shut her up completely. They're offering her a talking head position. Even the way he offers it, it's like to call it you know, you can be a talking head.
It's, like, dismissive. Right? It's like, oh, these people that jabber on every day. All these people that just talk about these talking heads, these these pointless speakers. Right?
They fear the information, obviously. But if they're given the choice between allowing Kary Lake to spout off daily on Fox News or Kary Lake with real power, They're gonna offer the talking head position. And then just like a mafia offering a no show job, We'll pay you. We'll put you on a company's payroll. And, of course, the way that he's presenting this As if he's not the one actively bribing and threatening her.
He's just the messenger. And this is part of the Criminal network that we're seeing unfold here is always, like, 1 or 2 degrees of separation Even if they're imaginary from the people really doing this. So he's coming at her not saying, here's what we're doing. Here's what I'm doing. Here's what I'm offering you, and here's what I'm demanding.
He's saying, hey. Look. The guys back east, the people back east, the faceless monsters that may not even exist, Here's what they're making me do. So let's cooperate. Let's be a team player because this is just reality.
And then she records it and publishes the audio and blows the whole thing right up in their face. Wonder if Jeff DeWitt is looking in his rearview mirror for cartel License plates following him around now. This is a mafia. This is a straight up mafia. So let's go let's go back.
And and again, she she identifies perfectly this is about destroying Trump. This is about working from within, not just the GOP, but within the high Level top brass GOP leadership to undercut their most prominent and powerful and popular candidate in the last 2 decades. This is I mean, we are we are seeing the sausage being made. We are speaking behind the curtain right now. We are seeing the way that politics is manipulated at a top.
I mean, you wanna talk about conspiracy. Nobody gets to say the word conspiracy in a negative way ever again. This is black and white incontrovertible evidence of a top level conspiracy manipulating American politics Within the party structure using bribes and threats and cooperation with drug cartels. This is a conspiracy of the highest order, and Carrie Lake blows the whole thing apart. Let's go back to the audio.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna look.
Speaker 1: It's not good that country does.
Speaker 3: It sounds great.
Speaker 0: It's not. But at the same time, I'm not even sure if something is I don't know if you will. I think where it really comes out to for a lot of people, I don't think I can control our agenda. It's about The ability to raise money to win. If you really want to know all of Buzzlox, all of Buzzlox is in the market.
And even on their end, what makes them the most money?
Speaker 1: No, all these consultants don't want their payday debt. And I don't wanna make a deal with these kind of people. This is a hill worth dying on. I I'm not if they're gonna steal the election To make me and our our movement go away, I'm not letting him do that. I owe it to the people of Arizona.
Or to carry their torch and their voice. Or
Speaker 0: You don't go away, but you pause.
Speaker 1: This is the battles right now, Jeff. Pause.
Speaker 0: And we go to college first pause.
Speaker 1: No. The battle is right now. The battle is right now, and, we don't have time to to pause on this battlefield.
Speaker 0: You're not what you can't scratch their back. It's not crazy.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's a backscratching flow. That's all DC is. It's a big backscratching flow. You're in no position to scratch everybody's back, and you've already been known that if you get there, you're not scratching everybody's back. I don't scratch people's backs.
I've been on the outs for a lot of people for a long time. I don't scratch people's backs. Where are we in 2 years If they steal the election again.
Speaker 1: Listen to what you're saying. Why don't we do something about it?
Speaker 0: What can we do?
Speaker 1: So that we, the people, can pick our.
Speaker 0: What can we do?
Speaker 1: If I'm not willing to accept that, then I'm gonna be the biggest pain in these people's go back and tell them that. I'm running, And I'm gonna be the biggest pain in their
Speaker 0: And I'm willing to tell them that.
Speaker 1: And they're gonna have to kill me To stop me.
Speaker 0: No. I know. I know. Look. Can I You don't have to
Speaker 3: I don't know if I've ever seen anything that cut and dry? What a weasel of a man. You can see it in his eyes, can't you? That picture that he's taken, I mean, just dead eyes. And he's so he's just such a liar.
The amount of deception that he tries to employ in that just couple minute exchange. We're sitting there pressuring her going, well, it's all about back scratching. It's all about back scratching. Right now, you don't have anything to offer them, and they're surrounded by people that can Offer them things. So it's a little, you know, let them scratch your back, you scratch theirs.
It's a little back and forth. Meanwhile, what he's Demanding she do is give up any opportunity to have power at all. So it's not about back scratch. It's not about Give me something I want, and I'll give it to you something you want. They want her to to be a non player for 2 years.
They want her Maybe had being a talking head on Fox, but largely just disappeared from public life for 2 years. So there's no if you wanna guarantee that you tea that you have nothing to offer them. If you wanna guarantee that you have no power that can benefit them, then you go work for, you know, whatever company Jeff's dad owns. So it it doesn't even make sense the whole I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine. They're trying to preclude her from power.
So how would she be able to her from power. So how would she be able to scratch anybody's back if she takes that offer? So that doesn't make any sense. And then he's he's going, and, you know, I don't scratch anybody's back. You know, I'm not a backscratcher either.
Like, you are literally in the middle of a pitch. Dude, what are you talking about? You're literally the hatchet man from the Eastern seaboard controllers here threatening and trying to bribe a popular senate candidate, And you interrupt your dissertation to say that you don't do this type of thing. They they lie like Like, they breathe. I mean, it's like second nature.
They don't have to think about it. And he admits, yeah, it's not great for this country, but it's all about And so but he says it's not really about control.
Speaker 0: It's not about control.
Speaker 3: It's not about ownership. It's about playing for the team. It's about scratching my back and I scratch yours. It's about submitting yourself to the threats that I'm vaguely throwing at you. And to be totally fair, to be completely, you know, unbiased in this, Kary Lake is obviously the one recording this.
And so anytime that's one party is recording and the other party isn't, you know that that first party may be changing the way that they're saying things With the knowledge that this audio might get out while the other party doesn't know they're being recorded and can be assumed to be Speaking in an, you know, unconscious sort of way, speaking in a in a candid sort of way, the person recording Always knows that they're recording. It's like the the videos and photos from the, from the big case between Johnny Depp And and his ex wife where they were presenting recordings where the ex wife sounded like she was being really calm and friendly, and it's like, yeah, but she's the one recording. She knows people are gonna see this video, So she's acting. So to be totally fair, you know, you'd wanna have a audio recording where neither one of them knew they were being recorded, and they just happen to get picked up by a security camera or something. Because Carrie Lake is the one recording, we can have a a bit of, Just just a touch of suspicion as to how powerful she she how powerfully she responds.
But she does respond that powerfully. The things she says are exactly right, whether that's for our benefit Listening to it later or what she actually believes, I I tend to believe her, but I'm just being totally fair as that's a a aspect of this situation. But, again, the important things to me, My takeaway from this is we're seeing, like, never before behind the curtain, inside how this works, how the pressure is is placed on people. This is almost certainly not the first and will not be the last offer she's gotten like this. So we're seeing behind the curtain.
We're seeing how this works. We're seeing the carrot and the stick, the team player, the the soft language, and the Insinuated threats. As, again, I haven't seen anybody report this yet. I can't think of another reason why when she says they're gonna try to kill me, why he brings up cartel members in all 50 states other than that being an oblique Threat against her. And we know that the Mexican cartels are being flushed with A 1,000,000,000 of dollars because of the federal government opening up the border right now.
We know that they've shipped them weapons, weaponry grade weapons. Mexico just complained about it. So is the cartel now operating as the enforcers of our political over Glass? And if so, can we get rid of these people? Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
2nd hour of The American Journal. Just what a what a crazy bombshell From Kary Lake. And again, I wanna point out that the leftist media is not even touching this despite the fact that Makes a very good case for pointing out high level corruption in the Republican party, which you would think they would wanna do The division was really republican versus democrat, but in reality, this is the elite who control those newspapers Going, yeah. Don't don't put that out. Don't talk.
Don't draw too much attention to that. Completely insane and shows you, you know, who's really behind the GOP, man. It's, yeah, Pretty insane. Pretty insane. And god bless Kerry Lake for bringing us that audio.
Speaker 0: We got
Speaker 3: a lot of other stuff to talk about here. Of course, Trump dominating in New Hampshire. We also have people suggesting that Nikki Haley stay in the race just in case Something were to happen to Donald Trump. It sounds like they make the threats In private and in public, it's like they publish the same vague hints at Physical violence, and just like they do in private, they frame it as concern. We're concerned that something might happen to Trump, They say as they load the gun with the bullets.
And, again, this you know, all they have. Literally all they have. I mean, they can't run on the economy. They can't run on unity, obviously. I mean, it's Laughable.
Just beyond the pale when you've got people like Joe Biden Calling himself a unifier while simultaneously calling half of his nation ultra MAGA domestic terrorist extremists That must be genocided. Like, nobody's bringing unity. I guess that is a form of unity. Yeah. I guess it is.
Different concepts of unity, but, you know, I would think that you'd wanna have people on the left and people on the right Unified with a superlative idea like Americanism, where you go, you might want it one way, I might want it the other way, But we both believe in America, so let's focus on that. That to me sounds like unity. And that, of course, is the construct that Trump and Vivek are pitching are pitching, but unity to them says, you have ideas. These people have other ideas. If we kill and suppress and censor and sterilize the people with the wrong ideas, then we'll all be unified on this side.
Yeah. That's that's a form of unity, I guess. You get rid of division by systematically eliminating anybody who disagrees with you. And then not only do you have unity amongst the people who agree with you that you've let live, But then if anybody wants to disagree with you, they'll keep their damn mouth shut because they know what happened last time somebody disagreed. So unity.
You know? Unity at the end of a gun. Unity in that if you try to separate from us, you are now the enemy and will be destroyed. Oh, so you wanna be on our team? Wow.
Good idea. Good idea. And they do it with a smile. So they can't run on unity. They can't run on the economy.
They can't run on American greatness. They can't run on energy independence. They can't run on Gas prices or schools or anything ever because everything they do directly negatively impacts the American Also, what are they what is the one refrain they're repeating over and over like a mantra? Is Trump is a dictator. Trump is a dictator.
Trump is a fascist. Trump will destroy politics. We have to save democracy by banning Trump from the ballot. And yet again, Trump issued ominous threat of investigations against Haley if she stays in the GOP race. Oh my god.
Is that even possible? Can you use investigations against an opponent as a political tool of suppression? Why has nobody ever done this before? Be right back.
Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening info wars.comforward/go.
Speaker 4: The second American revolution is happening now right in front of And you're tuned in to Infowars because you're either looking for the truth or you're already a patriot. I'm asking you now to realize we are at the fulcrum, the crossroads in the fight For human destiny and human future. Please spread the word about the broadcast. Please buy great products info wars store dot com, and Please pray for the transmission. Without you, we're gonna fail.
But if you simply take action and spread the word and pray for the broadcast and buy the products, You will continue to aid us together in our victory against these tires, but now is the time to make the decision. I know there's millions of forms of media out there in all this BS, and the globalist hope you get lost in all of it. But notice the globalist, the new world order are coming after us because they realize we've got They're number. Think about it. Info wars is the tip of the spear.
You wanna support the tip of the spear? That decision is up to you. Please support us now at the Full Restore.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
I don't totally agree with the tone of this video, but the facts are absolutely solid. Palestine is Winning. Credit: @propandco https://t.co/k0niTLmRVe
Video Transcript AI Summary
On October 7th, a resistance movement in Gaza carried out a successful military operation against Israel, which has been covered up by the Zionist media. The Palestinians did not commit the atrocities they have been accused of, but instead launched a coordinated attack on Israeli military sites, resulting in a humiliating defeat for Israel. This event has reawakened the spirit of resistance among Palestinians and has led to widespread protests and calls for the liberation of Palestine. Israel is resorting to collective punishment and spreading propaganda to maintain the illusion of power, but they are losing support and facing pressure from around the world. This is an opportunity for people everywhere to apply pressure and break the system of oppression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You really know what happened on October 7th? You think you do, but believe me, you don't. You've been lied to. We all have. The Zionist media has presented this event to the world as a holocaust against innocent civilians.
But the story couldn't be more from. The Zionists have been lying because they are terrified of what actually happened. You see, October 7th is one of the biggest ongoing cover ups in recent memory. A grand lie to distract you from the truth, and it's been working. People have either bought in to the atrocity propaganda lies or they're too busy trying to disproven.
Palestinians didn't behead babies, didn't put babies in ovens, didn't rape women. They didn't torture civilians. Liars. So many of us have been so focused on what didn't happen on October 7th. What we need to do now is focus on what did happen because Israel is terrified of the truth.
And I'll let you in on a little secret. The truth that I'm about to reveal to you is what will destroy to Zionist regime that will free Palestine. Yes. It's that serious. By the end of this video, you will understand why.
Now let's get to it. What really happened on October 7th. And why has Israel tried to cover it up? The truth is that on October 7th, resistance fighters from Gaza carried out a daring military against a juggernaut, and they succeeded. Israel and its hubris had begun to believe that the Palestinian movement was uninterested in armed resistance.
From within the confines of their concentration camps, underdogs from Gaza had to avoid detection from sent surveillance by satellites, informants, collaborators, motion detection and seismic sensors, and 247 monitoring by 2 g phone networks, border cameras, and overhead drones. They undermined Israel's security apparatus by planning details on pen and paper, feeding false information to foreman and leveraged Israeli arrogance and complacency to plan and operate relatively undetected. Texted. In the early hours of October 7th, a blitz of over 22100 rockets were fired at the Iron Dome missile defense system. But this was only truly meant to provide the cover needed to fly drones over the $1,000,000,000 iron in wall and destroy the remote controlled machine gun turrets and communication towers.
They rammed through the first layer of the fence and then created over 20 separate breach points through the main iron wall. Their immediate objectives, take out important nearby command and control military sites and do so as quickly as possible before the Israelis could respond. So they split into small divisions and race to their targets. Speedboats raced across the ocean and on to the beaches of Sikkim while paragliders flew over the wall and landed in various areas. Guys on beat up motorcycles and pickup trucks use homemade made anti tank missiles to take out $3,000,000 Merkava tanks and $20,000,000 Apache helicopters.
They conquered Rahim military base communications and drone surveillance headquarters, killing or capturing all the soldiers inside before destroying the server rooms. According to Scott Ritter, Hamas struck the headquarters of the Gaza division, the local intelligence hub, and other major command and control facilities with brutal precision, turning what should have been a 5 minute response time into many hours, more than enough time for Hamas to carry out one of to primary objectives, the taking of hostages to use as exchange for the near 5,000 men, women, and children rotting in Israeli administrative detention centers, returning to Gaza with more than 230 Israeli soldiers and civilians. The result was a complete route of local Israeli military forces. For hours, the Israelis were completely in the confused as to where the attack was even coming from. Thousands of rockets were in the air.
Dozens of bases and military settlements, AKA kibbutz, were captured, and multiple helicopters and tanks were destroyed. The attack came so hard and so fast that many IDF soldiers were still in their pajamas as the resistance fighters enter to the barracks. How could these half starved and besieged fighters have the gall to escape their prison and carry out an hacked like this. No one in Israel could have imagined it, let alone expect desperate to respond. The Israelis began to implement scorched to Earth tactics.
Their helicopters began firing hellfire missiles and machine gun rounds indiscriminately at vehicles and people running in the fields. Tanks rolled through the kibbutz and main roads and shelled houses as ground troops exchanged fire with militants. This led to the deaths of many civilians. Ins. It was the most humiliating defeat in Israel's history and has created an internal political crisis that could break the Israeli government for good.
Netanyahu, Desperate to hold on to power is exchanging accusations with the military and intelligence apparatus as neither want to take responsibility for the humiliating defeat. Tens of thousands of Israeli protesters are in the streets demanding that Israel agree to a hostage swap with the Palestinians in order to save their family members, and the crisis is external as well. The Palestinians have reawakened a spirit of resistance in the face of at ongoing military occupation.
Speaker 1: Resistance has proven its value. This is one of the chance we've been hearing from here who have been protesting in support of the prisoners exchange deal.
Speaker 0: The Israelis thought they could expand the illegal occupation, steal more land, build more settlements, erect more walls, arrest more children, increase surveillance, siege, starve and bomb Gaza to hell and desecrate the holy Al Aqsa Mosque without any blowback or consequences. The Israelis implemented a policy of brutality and deterrence instead of one of peace, justice, and diplomacy, and it worked for a time. Palestinians had become complacent with the status quo, and the Muslim world was betraying the Palestinian cause and normalizing with Israel. But Hamas undermined all of this with their bold active resistance on October 7th. The illusion of Israeli power has now been shattered.
The veil has been lifted. Power resides Where men believe it resides. It's a trick, a shadow on the wall. On October 7th, they post Israel's power for what it is, a trick, a shadow on the wall. And this terrifies Israel because despite all their wealth, power, and resources.
They cannot defeat an opponent that won't go down. The Israelis were shocked on October 7th because they thought the fight was over. After 75 years of brutality, 75 years of occupation, of violence, they thought they had 1. They thought the leadership of the Palestinian resistance had been cowed into submission. For all their walls, Drones, bombs, sensors, radars, cameras, bullets, rockets, and jets.
The Palestinian will to resist sis. It always has, and it always will. As Amr Mokhtar, the legendary resistance fighter said, it's win or die. It's victory for martyrdom. This is a spirit that has reawakened in the Palestinians and their diaspora on October 7th, and this is why the Israelis terrified.
Speaker 2: There was that ant that stood up to me. Yeah. But we can
Speaker 3: forget about him. Yeah. It was just one ant.
Speaker 0: Oh, one ant. Hey.
Speaker 3: You're right. It's just one ant. Yeah, boys. They're puny.
Speaker 2: Puny. Say, let's pretend this brain is a puny little ant.
Speaker 0: Did that hurt?
Speaker 2: Nope. Well, how about this one? How about this? You let 1 ant stand up to us, then they all might stand up.
Speaker 4: Those puny little ants outnumber us
Speaker 2: It's a 100 to 1.
Speaker 4: And if they ever figure that out, there goes our way of life.
Speaker 2: It's not about food. It's about keeping those ants in line.
Speaker 0: This is why they have responded with a disgusting level of collective punishment. When the Romans wanted to well to gladiator rebellion. They crucified over 6,000 slaves and lined their bodies up along the Appian Way. For 125 miles from Capua to Rome. Travelers would see nothing but crucified bodies.
Israel is trying to do the same, but with bombs instead of crucifixions. They want to make an example out of Palestinian resistance. They're trying to show the Palestinians in the West Bank that Resistance will be met with gross forms of violence, and they want their Arab and Muslim neighbors to know that they will level their cities like air level in Gaza. But this is not a display of strength, quite the opposite. It's a display of weakness.
They are so desperate to maintain the illusion, the trick, The shadow on the wall that they are destroying their reputation and exposing themselves in front of the entire world. And while you may think that Israel enjoys full western to port. There is a limit to what the world will accept. All over the world, millions of people are marching. The United States just witnessed its largest ever.
Palestine demonstration. People of all races and class joined together to denounce the genocide of Gaza and call for the liberation to Palestine. Western political leaders are slowly changing their tune, calling for humanitarian pauses and trying to negotiate a long term ceasefire, and Muslim leaders
Speaker 2: all over the world
Speaker 0: are feeling the pressure as well. The Indonesian president and Malaysian prime minister condemned the Israeli attack right to the face of Joe Biden. The king of Jordan, who has historically been soft in his condemnation is talking about war, and Turkey's rhetoric has been increasingly openly hostile to Israel and its western supporters. This isn't enough, but it is evidence that Palestinian resistance as working. It is evidence that your voices are being heard.
Your demonstrations are being watched. Your social media Tivity is working, and Israel is terrified. This is why they are lying about what occurred on October 7th. They do not want to Palestinian resistance, whether it's violent or peaceful, to be viewed as legitimate or justified. They don't want it to be seen as effectual.
They do not Want their illusion of power to be shattered, so they have resorted to committing atrocities and spreading atrocity propaganda lies. They have to What Hamas did on October 7th dirty. They need to cover up that their military was completely routed in a military raid in order to maintain this perception of strength and power. But the truth is, they are losing support from the populations to the west, and their economy is hemorrhaging money. They are losing over $600,000,000 a week.
Their government hangs on by a to read, and this weakness comes at a time when there is already tremendous pressure on their biggest ally, the United States. This cannot last forever. The clock is ticking. The protests are mounting. Netanyahu's days are numbered.
Biden and the Democrats are facing reelection. The dollar is late in. The Ukraine war is failing. The US empire is in decline, and China, Russia, Turkey, Saudi, and Iran are rising. The subjugation of the to any people isn't sustainable.
Their system is breaking, and together, we can break it. This is the opportunity. This is the moment to seize upon. Pressure must be applied everywhere from the West Bank of Palestine to the streets of Turkey, Jordan, Indonesia, and the West. The politicians and the media will try to move on from this issue, but we cannot allow them to do so.
The Israelis and all their arrogance or buying us more time. They are insisting on invading southern Gaza, which gives us the opportunity to organize and resist before it's too late. We must not only continue the protests, we must escalate them. There isn't a single pressure point. There are pressure points all over the world that lead directly to the White House.
Wherever you are, whatever you're doing in those areas, do more of it non unstopped. You see, we don't just want a pause in the fighting. We want a pause in all of society until the issue is addressed. This can be accomplished by sustained peaceful protests in the heart of your cities. We must force this issue until the world pressures Israel to finally and their occupation.
Speaker 2: Let this be a lesson to all you ants. Ideas are very dangerous things. You are mindless, soil shopping losers. Put on this earth to serve Ask. You're wrong, Hopper.
Ants are not meant to serve grasshoppers. I've seen these ants do great things, and year after year, they somehow manage to pick food for themselves And you. So so who is the weaker species? Ants don't serve grasshoppers. It's you who need us.
We're a lot stronger than you say we are, and you know it, don't you?
Speaker 0: Gaza was the little ant that stood up. We cannot allow them to fight alone. This is not a call for violence. It is a call for mass civil rest and protest all over the world. We must spread the word and let everyone know their system is breaking.
It's been breaking for decades. This is the moment. We must apply pressure until we break it. If they wish to enslave the Palestinians, we must make them for. And if we wish for Palestine to be free, we must fight for them.
So let's keep fighting and see who taps out first.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
“Intelligence Agencies” started with International Banking. https://t.co/rNzooerlB2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Intelligence agencies originated from the international banking system, specifically the Rothschilds. They established major banking headquarters in European cities to facilitate trade. Nathaniel Rothschild's intelligence network was renowned, as demonstrated when he sold his stocks after the Battle of Waterloo, leading people to believe they had lost. In reality, his agents were buying stocks at low prices. This event exemplifies how intelligence networks can control economic systems. The birth of intelligence agencies occurred because bankers realized that having vast wealth allowed them to easily influence governments, while also possessing superior information. National governments relied on them for accurate knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you trace it back through the timeline, you see that intelligence agencies as a concept didn't actually spring from governments at all. In fact, they grew out of the international banking system. The Rothschilds pioneered this by having major banking headquarters in Five major European cities. And in order to facilitate trade of money from different countries, you had to have an international information system That was heads and shoulders above anything that governments were able to carry out. Famous story, and most people in the conspiracy world know of Nathaniel Rothschild buying up the UK market, the entire British economy essentially following the battle of Waterloo.
He simply went out and very publicly He started selling everything he had, and everybody knew that guy has the best intelligence network in the world. If he's selling all of his stocks, it means we lost the battle at Waterloo. Lou. While in reality, his agents were behind the scenes buying everything up at rock bottom prices. And people point to that as how you get control of an economic system.
But importantly, the way they're able to achieve that was because of the intelligence that they had, because of the intelligence network, because of the communication lines that they had set up. So that was really the birth of intelligence agencies was the bankers realizing not only having all the money makes it extremely Convenient and easy to control national governments. But we have better information than the national governments, and they actually have to rely on us to learn what's true.
reSee.it AI Summary
The German government sent orphan children to live with pedophiles, allegedly for the purpose of sexual grooming and abuse. This was done as a means to defeat fascism. Additionally, children were reportedly taken away from their parents to be kept as child sex slaves. One victim, Marco, was taken from his mother by the Welfare office and placed in the home of a known pedophile, who manipulated him into rejecting his own mother despite her efforts to reunite with him.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Yes, the German government sent orphan children to live with pedophiles, explicitly to be sexually groomed and abused. Why, though? Why would they do such a thing?? Well, to defeat fascism, naturally. Defeat the Nazis by raping children! https://t.co/AwyIcFYBdU
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
You might think that this headline is overly dramatic, but the truth is even worse than it seems at first. It wasn't just orphans that were sent to live with pedos, they actually ripped children away from their parents in order to keep them as child sex slaves.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Marco, one of Kentler's victims was taken from his mother by the Welfare office. He was placed in the home of a known pedophile, who brainwashed him into rejecting his own mother despite her desperate attempts to get him back. https://t.co/lGILFOye1k
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
🚨 INFOWARS >>X<< EXCLUSIVE 🚨 Comparing Donald Trump To Bill Clinton In The Epstein Documents https://t.co/Om7CKFkWqo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Jeffrey Epstein documents have been released, and the mainstream media is trying to distract from the scandal by focusing on Donald Trump. However, the documents actually clear Trump of any wrongdoing. He is mentioned in the documents, but witnesses confirm that he was never present where the victims were. On the other hand, Bill Clinton is a key person in the Epstein files and is mentioned 73 times. Witnesses testify to Clinton's close relationship with Epstein and his alleged interest in young girls. Clinton participated in helicopter flights and dinner parties with young girls. While both Trump and Clinton are mentioned, Clinton is far more important in the documents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the Jeffrey Epstein documents have dropped. And so, of course, that means the mainstream media is working double time to cover up the scandal that they've known about for years and have done a pretty good job of hiding in the 1st place. And, of course, they're resorting to their favorite tactic, which is distract with Donald Trump. In fact, the Yahoo News article headline is this, the Epstein list, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump appear in unsealed documents multiple times, here's what we know. Or as Vanity Fair put it, Trump supporters are very worked up about the Jeffrey Epstein list.
And so, of course, that would leave you with the impression that Bill Clinton and Donald Trump are sort of talked about equally in these papers. But what's the reality? Let's compare and contrast the way Trump and Bill Clinton are discussed in the Epstein documents. Well, first of all, Donald Trump is essentially cleared of all wrongdoing by the documents that have just been released. In fact, when asked when one of the witnesses or victims was asked about Donald Trump and if they ever saw Donald Trump at Jeffrey Epstein's home, the answer is not that I can remember, what about on his island?
Also, no. In New Mexico, no. In New York, not that I can remember. K. So, yes, he is mentioned in the document, but he's mentioned in that he was never in any of the places where the victims were.
In addition, when asked a number of different questions about who was involved, George Lucas, no. Donald Trump, no. Did you ever massage Donald Trump? No. So, yeah, he was technically mentioned in the documents, but the way he was mentioned was when they were asked, was Donald Trump there?
Did he victimize you, the answer was no. Over and over again, the answer was no. So that's Trump being mentioned in the Epstein documents. What about Bill Clinton? Well, quote, Bill Clinton is a key person Epstein files finally unsealed.
Apart from the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein himself, former president Clinton is a key person who can provide information about his real close relationship with the defendant and mister Epstein. So in the document relating to Bill Clinton, they say that he's basically the 3rd most important person that you should talk to after Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton knows a lot about what's going on. In addition to that, one one of the most damning pieces of evidence comes from witness testimony by Johanna Sjoberg, who alleges Epstein remarked about Clinton's purported interest in young girls. Sjoberg stated, Epstein once said, quote, Clinton likes them young, in reference to underage girls. These chilling wood words expose a dark undercurrent within the world of power and privilege that surrounded Epstein.
And in fact, when broke broken down by number of mentions, Clinton is the 3rd most mentioned person in the documents behind prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. Clinton is mentioned 73 times. And when you go through, they talk about helicopter flights that, Clinton was on with, some of the victims' dinner parties where he was, as this, summation puts it, exhibiting a playful and cheeky demeanor in the absence of Hillary Clinton. So, again, the mainstream media is publishing headlines that say Donald Trump and Bill Clinton mentioned in Epstein documents. The reality is Donald Trump has mentioned a few times when they're asked, was Donald Trump there?
And the answer is no. Whereas Bill Clinton is the 3rd most mentioned person in the documents. He is the 3rd most important person to talk to according to the documents to get information about the sex trafficking ring. And he's mentioned his love for young girls and even several anecdotes about him participating and interacting with young girls on helicopters and dinner parties and other various activities. So, yeah, they're both mentioned, but one little bit more important than the other.
And just to close out, we're gonna listen here to a lawyer of 1 of the victims of of Jeffrey Epstein when he was asked about Donald Trump's participation or not in the activities of Jeffrey Epstein in the blackmail spy ring that he was engaged in. Stay tuned for that. For Infowars, this has been Harrison Smith.
Speaker 1: Obviously, Our current president has had relationships as I've seen in the past, and there are those, Katie Johnson and maybe other victims who have accused Trump of being involved in things if This, in my experience, Trump supporters will not listen to anything along those lines. Obviously, we're not a court of law here right now, but are those claims of the though that case was dropped, it was dropped before it went to to court. And your opinion as a lawyer and your experience, is there anything you can say as if the validity of those claims or whether or not there will be any, you know, any more about that.
Speaker 2: Nothing at all. I the only thing that I can say about president Trump is that he is the only person who in 2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people or at least gave notice to some pretty, connected people that I was going that I wanted to talk to them. He is the only person who picked up the phone And said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave if whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us and that we didn't have to picked a a a deposition of him.
That was in 2009? That was in 2009.
Speaker 1: So do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago?
Speaker 2: I've definitely heard have
Speaker 3: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. 29 years on air, all I've wanted to do was warn the people about the And I've done the best job I can to tell the truth and been accurate, and we are on record as the most accurate there are. And I've tried to sell products to fund ourselves. Unlike other communist revolutionaries that rob banks and kidnap people, we don't do that. We try to bring you products that really work.
And ladies and gentlemen, I'm scared of this product. It's so powerful. This is the breakdown product after yourselves process it have Of folic acid, Methylfolate with high quality organic b complex. This stuff is rocket fuel. It's not a if It it energizes your cells, and then everything else you take just supercharges it.
It's so insane. It's if Foundational energy, the strongest formula out there at infowarsstore.com. It doesn't just energize this operation against the tyrants. It energizes if This is you. Get foundational energy now.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Prince Andrew subjected to Humiliation Ritual by Epstein and Maxwell. https://t.co/zcENYWM1zm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Prince Andrew is facing allegations of sexual misconduct with underage girls. What stands out is that he was manipulated and blackmailed into posing with a puppet of himself, with one hand on the puppet's breast and the other on a girl's breast. This humiliating act was captured in a photo, emphasizing his loss of control and the extent to which he is being controlled by others. The intention was to show him as a puppet, completely under their control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Allegations against prince Andrew. Maxwell and Epstein put prince Andrew's hand on a minor 17 year old's breast. That's not the weird part about this story to me. They had a puppet of prince Andrew, like a literal like a muppet, like a puppet of prince Andrew, and there were 2 girls. And so they had the puppet and put the puppet's hand on 1 girl's breast, and then prince Andrew put his hand on another girl's breast, and then they took a picture, like a funny picture.
Like, look, it's prince Andrew molesting a girl, and it's a puppet of prince Andrew molesting a girl, which it's like the humiliation. Right? Here's a guy that is an esteemed member of one of the last remaining royal houses of any power in Europe. Right? Prince Andrew, a literal prince of the crown who is being puppeted because he's being blackmailed.
He's being seduced and honey potted, and manipulated in order to sleep with underage girls, in order to capture that on video, in order to turn the man into a puppet, and they actually bring out a puppet of him, and have him pose with the puppet doing the thing that they blackmail him with to make him a puppet. It's like there's like a humiliation aspect to this, isn't there? With, like, you are a puppet. And actually I've been participating in this and thinking it's funny. Oh, yeah.
It's me and the puppet. We're both doing the same thing. Meanwhile, they're taking the picture going, you are a puppet. You're our puppet. We're gonna do with you whatever we want.
You are our puppet now, and we control you. We control you so thoroughly, we're gonna have you pose with a puppet just to really just really put it over the top, really give you the image of who you are now. You're a puppet now of us. We're gonna take a picture of you with the puppet so there's no confusion.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Which “conspiracy theories” turned out to be true? https://t.co/N8glewFmu7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some conspiracy theories that have turned out to be true include the Trump-Russia investigation, Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, the JFK assassination, the misuse of the Patriot Act, the Iraq war and weapons of mass destruction, the war in Ukraine, the bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, open border migration caravans, the climate change scam, chemtrails, HARP, 9/11 being an inside job, the Internet of Things surveillance grid, PFAs, F.A.S, chemicals in the water affecting sexual orientation, the 2020 election being stolen, undercover feds on January 6th, Bilderberg and Bohemian Grove, global government, China's research threat, declining birth rates, defunding the police, George Soros, mail-in ballots, big tech censorship, disinformation agencies, and Obama's birth certificate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of these conspiracy theories, have turned out to be true. Which ones? The Trump Russia witch hunt, Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein, JFK assassination, the misuse of the Patriot Act, the Iraq war, the weapons of mass destruction, the war in Ukraine, the bombing of the Nord Stream pipeline, Epstein pipeline, the open border migration caravans, the climate change scam, chemtrails, and HARP, and 911 being an inside job, and the Internet of Things surveillance grid, and PFAs, F. A. S, and chemicals in the water turning everyone gay, and the 2020 election being stolen and January 6th being filled with undercover feds, and Bilderberg and Bohemian Grove and global government, not to mention a new function research in the threat of China, and collapsing birth rates and defund the police and George Soros and mail in ballots and big tech censorship and disinformation agencies and Obama's birth Tifkit, and and probably some others I can't think of.
I mean, so a few of them. I guess a couple of them have been true.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Covid *Smoking Gun* Uncovered Gain-of-Function engineers caught red handed in Lab Origin cover-up! https://t.co/XjTTjLaMRG
Video Transcript AI Summary
American scientists lied to DARPA in order to secure funding for high-risk coronavirus research in Wuhan, China, according to documents obtained by US Right to Know. The scientists concealed their intentions and claimed the research was being done in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, due to national security concerns and lax safety measures at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The documents raise doubts about the scientists' credibility and their claims that the pandemic could not have originated from their collaboration. The proposal involved engineering coronaviruses with spike proteins and furin cleavage sites, similar to SARS-CoV-2. The experiments were planned to occur in Wuhan with fewer safety precautions to save costs. This revelation is considered a smoking gun in the lab leak controversy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is smoking gun, folks. This is a absolute smoking gun. They lied to DARPA in order to get funding by saying they were doing work here that was actually being done in Wuhan. They didn't want it done in Wuhan because of national security concerns and because of lack security measures at the Wuhan Institute. They recognize this.
They knew this. And so they lied in their application claiming that it was being done in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. This is the smoking gun. We also have this story. American scientists misled Pentagon on research in Wuhan.
This is from usrtk.org. American researchers concealed their intentions to conduct high risk coronavirus research in Wuhan under lax safety standards from the Pentagon the year before COVID nineteen pandemic according to documents obtained by US Right to Know. A 2018 grant proposal called Project Defuse, coauthored by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and American Scientist, has stoked concern that the pandemic resulted from a lab accident. My god. We're still debating this.
It came from a lab. It came, but the only thing we're trying to determine is whether it was on purpose or not.
Speaker 1: It's like you have somebody that's dead, and
Speaker 0: they're still debating on whether he's dead. No. He's dead. The question is, was he poisoned, or did he die of natural causes? Is there a murderer to be found out?
Or was this all just a big accident? He's dead. It came from a lab. The question is, was it on purpose? Who developed it, and why, etcetera, etcetera.
So it's frustrating. Yes. It came from a lab, you absolute morons, but moving on. It proposed engineering high risk coronaviruses of the same species as SARS and SARS COVID 2. More worrying to some scientists, the proposal involved synthesizing spike proteins with furin cleavage sites, the same feature that supercharged SARS COV 2 into the most infectious pandemic pathogen in a century.
Indeed, some scientists have likened Diffuse to a blueprint for generating SARS COV 2 in the lab. The new documents obtained by US Right TO Know show These experiments were proposed to occur in part of Wuhan with fewer safety precautions than required in the US, apparently to save on costs. Well, I guess you saved on cost. I guess it's I guess you can just offshore everything to China to save on cost. Don't wanna pay a living wage?
Use slave labor in China. Don't wanna adhere to environmental regulations despite being the one to impose them on everybody? Outsource your manufacturing to China. You wanna create a deadly virus with the potential to infect the world and devastate the lives of 1,000,000. Can't do it in America?
Save a couple bucks by going to China and killing
Speaker 1: everyone. Globalism at work.
Speaker 0: The American scientists at the center of the lab leak, controversy appeared to have concealed this from their desired funder, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in order to evade any national security concerns about doing high level biosecurity work. In China, the documents call into question the credibility of these scientists' assurances that the pandemic could not have sprung out of their collaboration. Yeah. The documents showing how they planned to do this, sort of undermines their claims that they had nothing to do with it.
Speaker 1: I guess that's true. I guess that's right. Yeah.
Speaker 0: The fact you're covered in blood sort of, undermines your claims
Speaker 1: that you didn't stab the guy to death to continue our murder analogy. US rights to know obtained an early draft
Speaker 0: of diffuse comments from PD and BRS. Emails show these commenters to be Peter Daszak and Ralph s Barrack, who you'll know if you're a regular viewer of InfoWars. Leads EcoHealth Health Alliance, an organization that discovers novel viruses. Barrick helms the University of North Carolina lab with
Speaker 1: a focus on coronaviruses Chapel Hill, if
Speaker 0: I'm not mistaken. Both Dazik and Barrick have worked with the Wuhan Institute of of Virology on gain of function research making coronaviruses more deadly or infectious. The formal diffuse grant proposal states that Barrick in cap in Chapel Hill, North Carolina will engineer the coronavirus spike proteins to test their ability to infect human cells. But in a comment on early draft of the proposal, Daszak clarifies that the Wuhan Institute of Virology will in fact do much of this work. But that this but that this is excluded from the formal proposal to make DARPA comfortable to make DARPA comfortable.
The comment is addressed to Barrick and Wuhan Institute of Virology senior scientist Jingli Xi. This is smoking gun, folks. This is a absolute smoking gun.
Speaker 1: They lied to DARPA in order
Speaker 0: to get funding by saying they were doing work here that was actually being done in Wuhan. They didn't want it done in Wuhan because of national security concerns and because of lax security measures at the Wuhan Institute. They recognize this. They knew this. And so they lied in their application claiming that it was being done in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
This is the smoking gun, literally. Like, if this was a murder case, this would be the fingerprints on the gun, the text message between the suspects saying, I just I told the cops I was here so they don't find out that I was actually at the murder scene.
Speaker 1: I mean, we've known
Speaker 0: that he was involved in the Wuhan Institute. We've known that he was working with the CIA. Peter Daszak, because of a whistleblower. We know that they created the virus in the lab. We know that they covered it up.
We've known all of this. But this here, the fact that they went out of their way and Dazic himself makes a note on an early draft of the proposal saying we're going to leave out the fact that's being done at Wuhan because otherwise DARPA would be uncomfortable and wouldn't let them do it.
Speaker 1: Absolutely incredible. Absolutely incredible.
Speaker 0: In another comment, Dazsick says he sought to, quote, downplay the non US focus of this proposal by DARPA, to DARPA by not highlighting the involvement of the Chinese researchers, Xi and Duke in US medical school professor Linfa Wang. Quote, I'm planning to use my resume and Ralphs, wrote. Linfa Jengali, I realize your resumes are also very impressive, but I'm trying to downplay the non US focus of this proposal so that DARPA doesn't see this as a negative. What do you do to to murder suspects?
Speaker 1: When you have incontrovertible
Speaker 0: evidence it was them, you take them to trial.
Speaker 1: Depends on the race.
Speaker 0: You give yeah. Depends on the race. Good news. Peter Dasek's a white guy, so he's gonna get the full force of the justice system, I can only imagine. In a comment on the document, Barrack acknowledged that US researchers would, quote, freak out if they knew the novel coronavirus engineering and testing work was being conducted in a BSL two lab.
In the US, these recombinant SARS CoV are studied under BSL 3, not BSL 2, especially important for those who are able to bind and replicate in primary human cells. In China. These might, might be growing these viruses under BSL 2. US researchers will likely freak out. Wow.
The lab didn't have enough security. They created the lab the the, furin cleavage sites, clearant furin cleavage sites and spike proteins that made it infectious to humans. They weaponized it. They lied in their application to DARPA to achieve this. This is a smoking gun.
This is smoking cannon. This might be the biggest story of the day.
Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells the truth about what's happening next. Winter is coming.
Speaker 2: Winter is coming.
Speaker 0: Winter is coming. Winter is coming.
Speaker 1: Winter is coming. Winter is Coming.
Speaker 2: Winter isn't coming. Winter is here. And while the sun isn't helping us produce as much vitamin d, Do yourself a favor and try Infowars Life Winter Sun Plus. Now back in stock and 40% off at info store.com. WinterSum Plus is a powerful vitamin d based formula, bringing you straight vitamin d three free of toxic chemicals, Allergens, preservatives, artificial colors, and GMOs.
Our vitamin d three formula supports the body's natural immune system, promotes calcium see him absorption for healthy bones and teeth and help sustain healthy tissue and systems of the body. When the winters come, they come cold. So weather the storm and supplement with Winter Sun plus. 40% off for a limited time at infowarsstore.com.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Threw together a quick compilation of my favorite Alex Jones clips, set to an appropriate soundtrack. This Little Light Of Mine: Alex Jones Edition https://t.co/4xcCiycSgV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Destiny, will, striving, trailblazing, exploring space, mathematics, quantum mechanics, and the secrets of the universe. Life's beauty, intricate details, fighting evil, not selling out, and taking down those who harm others. It's an attack on humanity by a group of psychopaths that must be defeated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's destiny. That's will. That's striving. That's being a trailblazer and blazer and explore, going into space, mathematics, quantum mechanics, the secrets of the universe. It's all there.
Life is Fiery with its beauty, this incredible detail. Tuning into it. I'm fighting evil. I love not selling out. I never in any way do anything that is not a 100% to Take these people down.
It's an attack on the species by a guild of psychopaths, and they must be defeated. I'm gonna
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
Covid Pitch Meeting
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good news! The ban on gain of function research has been rolled back, allowing for the modification of viruses to be more deadly and transmissible to humans. This is to prepare for potential future outbreaks. However, there has been an outbreak of a respiratory virus in Wuhan, China, near the research lab. The virus is said to have come from a farmer's market, not the lab. The global medical establishment is supposedly prepared for such situations, but they are doing little to contain the spread. The virus affects the elderly and sick more severely. Masks are mandatory, despite evidence suggesting they don't work. Lockdowns have been implemented, shutting down businesses, except for big chain stores. The economy is expected to crash. Plastic barriers and social distancing are imposed, but they are ineffective. Contact tracing is encouraged, raising concerns about privacy. An investigative team is sent to investigate the lab, but it is led by the lab's own director. The speaker questions the logic behind these measures and expresses skepticism about the revolutionary mRNA vaccine being developed with the help of Bill Gates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good news. Oh, yeah? Yeah. We've rolled back the ban on gain of function research, really. So now it's legal for us to modify viruses and make them more deadly and transmissible to humans.
Why would you want to do that? Well, it's important that we be prepared in case something like that happen in the future. In case somebody modifies a deadly virus to be more infectious and able to transmit to humans. Oh, can you imagine? Yeah.
Sounds dangerous. No. No. No. It's fine.
We're doing it at a level 4 weapons research lab in Wuhan, China. Very secure. Okay. Good. Terrible news.
Oh, no. There's been an outbreak of a mysterious new respiratory virus in Wuhan, China. Wuhan, China, like like where the research lab is? Yeah. Yeah.
Exactly. Right where the lab is. So do you think it could have come from the lab? But no. Absolutely not.
No. I I see how you could make that mistake, but no. No. No. The virus, the deadly virus with the artificial furin cleavage sites to make it able to infect humans.
That came from the farmer's market down the road from the, dangerous bioweapons lab. And you expect us to believe that? I'll ban you from the Internet if you don't. Oh, god. No need to worry.
The global medical establishment's always preparing for these types of things. In fact, like, 2 months ago, they held a course called the Abint two zero one where they basically predicted exactly what would happen right down to the type of virus and and where it came from. So so they're, like, totally on top of this. Actually, they're gonna do nothing for months and let it spread all over the world. But it started in China.
Right? Like, can we at least halt travel with them? I didn't realize you were a racist. What? I didn't realize you had some deep seething hatred of Asian people.
And in fact, I I think it's despicable. Woah. Woah. I'm talking about the virus. Oh, the virus?
It's here now. Yeah. I bet. Yeah. I came on a plane from China.
There's nothing we could do. Well, what do we know about the virus so far? Not a lot, but we're gonna go ahead and assume that it's the deadliest thing in the world and everybody's scared. We're all scared. You didn't seem very worried about it when it was in China.
Well, no. No. I was calling you a racist then. That's what was important, but now we're very scared of the virus. Everybody's scared.
You're scared. Well, does it affect certain ages or populations or groups, anything like that? Yeah. Actually, it's way deadlier to the elderly and the sick. Okay.
Well, why don't we start by protecting them? And now we're actually gonna send COVID infected patients into nursing homes instead. Entities. Well, okay. Well, what are you doing to stop the spread?
UV lights, vitamin c, vitamin d? Where should I wear a mask? We know that masks don't really stop from getting this type of infection. The the science is pretty much settled on this. Masks don't work.
Okay. So no masks. Actually, they're mandatory. And also we're shutting down everything. Wait.
What? Yeah. It's called lockdown. I'm basically declaring martial law and saying that you can't leave your house or gather in large groups. How do you think you're gonna get people to go along with this?
Well, totally for 2 weeks. It's gonna last forever, isn't it? Maybe. And you're shutting everything down? Everything?
Every restaurant? Every store? Yep. Absolutely everything. Everything's shut down.
We're all in this together. So even, like, Walmart and Target? No. They can stay open. Okay.
What about, like, McDonald's or Taco Bell? Obviously, McDonald's and Taco Bell can stay open. Okay. So the big chain stores can stay open, but if a small business tries to stay open, we will send a tank and point a rifle in their face and maybe send them to jail, but it's only for 2 weeks or years or whatever. I mean, won't that crash the economy?
Oh, yeah. 100%. For sure. Okay. But this stops the virus.
It does not. No. Oh, okay. Other than masks that don't work and lockdowns that don't work, is there anything else you suggest that we do? Oh, I'm not suggesting anything.
I'm I'm imposing plastic barriers and social distancing as well. Okay. So those work. No. Of course not.
It's ridiculous. Just think about it. But we do encourage contact tracing, where you download our app to your phone and then use it to log everywhere you go and everything you do and everyone you interact with. Sounds like a precursor to vaccine passport. No way.
That's Crazy. Hey. By the way, we sent a, investigative team to figure out the origins of the virus. Oh, so you're investigating the lab? No.
Okay. K. Well, who are you sending to investigate? The guy who runs the lab. Yeah.
This sounds suspicious. It's not. I mean, the whole thing sounds Gotcha. Nothing you're saying really makes any sense, and it seems like the same people imposing the masks and lockdowns are the same people that are benefiting from it, and it seems like it's gonna have way worse long term effects than the virus So, I mean, all of this seems arbitrary and expensive. Well, it's only until we get the vaccine, and and actually, it's gonna be a wonderful revolutionary new mRNA vaccine.
So, you know, thank god we have Bill Gates helping us with this. Bill Gates, isn't he the one who thinks the most pressing issue the earth faces is overpopulation and that the best way to reduce population and is through vaccines. Didn't he give a TED talk to that effect? No. Shut up.
He loves you.
@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞
This is incredible. Even more so when you realize that the programs that had just started at this point are in full operation now. If you only have a few minutes, jump to 14:30