TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @KathleenWinche3
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Why is this not being reported anywhere! 18 health care workers have been arrested! The charges are serious! Wow 🤯 https://t.co/jlDDJwlxRY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Eighteen healthcare workers were arrested at Colonial Heights Rehab and Nursing Center in Virginia after a patient death. The state responded to the death of a 78-year-old resident and arrested the employees, including a nurse and the administrator, as they arrived for work. The charges include seven counts of felony abuse and neglect of a vulnerable adult, two counts of misdemeanor abuse and neglect of a vulnerable adult, two counts of obstruction, and 27 counts of falsifying patient records.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 18 healthcare workers were arrested yesterday as they showed up to work at Colonial Heights Rehab and Nursing Center in Virginia. It's a skilled nursing facility. The state showed up in response to a patient death, a 78 year old resident there, and they arrested 18 employees, including a nurse and the administrator as they arrived to work. There are seven counts of felony abuse and neglect of a vulnerable adult, two counts misdemeanor abuse and neglect of a vulnerable adult, two counts obstruction, and 27 counts of falsifying patient records.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
It’s amazing what Trump and his team have achieved in such a short period of time. Amazing! ♥️♥️♥️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://t.co/UKJnBssnEJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a single weekend, Trump reshaped the world by brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and an in-person meeting between Ukraine and Russia. He also announced a trade agreement between the U.S. and China.
Trump signed an executive order to cut prescription drug prices by up to 80%. His envoy confirmed Hamas agreed to release the last known American hostage in Gaza.
He signed another executive order for a self-deportation program, offering illegal immigrants free flights and financial incentives to leave the U.S. Finally, he established the National Center for Warrior Independence, aiming to house up to 6,000 homeless veterans by 2028.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know if you noticed, but in one weekend, this past weekend, Trump has reshaped the world. While the media was silent, Trump was making history. For starters, he brokered a ceasefire between India Pakistan, brokered an in person meeting between Ukraine and Russia, then he announced the long awaited trade agreement between The US and China. He signed an executive order to slash prices on prescription drugs by up to 80%. Trump's envoy confirmed that Hamas agreed to release the last known American hostage in Gaza.
He signed an executive order for a self deportation program to allow illegal immigrants free flights and financial incentives to get out of our country. And finally, he signed another executive order establishing the National Center for Warrior Independence, aiming to house up to 6,000 homeless veterans by 2028. I don't know about you, but this is what I voted for. We voted for the man that is right for this job. During a weekend, three days is what it took for Trump to accomplish seven major things that'll reshape this world.
During Biden's whole presidency, he couldn't even accomplish one of these things. I'm blown away. We still have three and a half more years. If you voted for Donald Trump, I want you to comment I did to show your appreciation for this man.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is what we’re up against. The UK is getting worse! No 2A there! https://t.co/7ryl9Hgj55
Video Transcript AI Summary
A migrant, believed to be new to the UK and in London, was captured on a Ring doorbell camera trying to kick in a door after following a lone woman home. The speaker claims this type of incident is increasing across the UK, with figures doubling. In April 2023, 2,130 men crossed the channel, while in April of this year, over 4,000 men crossed. The speaker advises awareness of surroundings, especially for women out alone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So some of you have might have seen this guy trying to kick your door in, but this is a a migrant that had not been in The UK for very long, believed to be in London. And he was trying to kick the door in because he was following a lone woman home. And when she went into her house, he was trying to get in. So this is what's coming across the channel. This type of stuff's going up in The UK, across The UK, and figures are doubling.
If you look at the figures for April, '2 thousand '1 hundred and '30 '2 of these men crossed the channel. And in April, over four thousand of these men have crossed the channel. This is actually captured on a Ring doorbell. But I just thought I'd share it with you for awareness when you're out and about, lots of women go out with the dog, etcetera, but you need to be aware of your surroundings and what might happen.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
What’s your take on this situation? https://t.co/PfiuKn83jg
Video Transcript AI Summary
A family was allegedly removed from a Delta Airlines flight from Hawaii to Los Angeles due to overbooking. Brian Sheer and his wife, Britney, were traveling with their infant son and daughter. They had purchased a seat for their teenage son, who took an earlier flight, and used it for their two-year-old.
The airline allegedly used this seat switch as justification to reassign the seat to a standby passenger. A flight attendant suggested the infant sit on a parent's lap. The family was stranded at midnight, and an airline employee allegedly told them they were on their own and that there were passengers waiting for their seats. A flight attendant allegedly threatened that the parents would be arrested and their kids would be taken away if they didn't give up their seats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It happened again. A family booted off an overbooked flight to make room for other passengers. What are we supposed to do once we're off this plane? And get this, a flight attendant actually said their kids would be taken away if they didn't surrender their seats. So there is gonna be a federal offense, and then you and your wife will be in jail, and your kids will be It happened on board a Delta Airlines flight from Hawaii to Los Angeles.
Brian Sheer and his wife, Britney, were returning from vacation with their infant son and daughter when they were told to give up one the seats. Brian had actually bought a seat for his teenage son. The teenager took an earlier flight. The family used that seat for their two year old. Apparently, that switch gave the airline an excuse to take the seat back and give it to a standby passenger.
A flight attendant actually suggested they take their infant son out of his car seat and sit on mom or dad's lap for the duration of the flight. It was midnight and the family was stranded. I got two infants and one. Have to stay. There's no more flights.
Who is this? Do you sleep in the airport? No. No. At this point, you guys are on your own.
Yep. She actually said, you guys are on your own. And as we're leaving the plane, there's four or five passengers there waiting for our seat. The bottom line is they oversold the flight.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
True story 😡
@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker
Senator Chris Van Hollen must be charged for violating the Logan Act. This was a direct violation of Trump's foreign policy. https://t.co/x83PEREptT
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
I think he should have handed her the constitution! ‼️ https://t.co/4QBGQzYt7k
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Department of Homeland Security agent questioned an individual filming a government-leased building. The individual stated they were filming for their own use and presented a DHS memo stating it is lawful to film the exterior of federal buildings.
The agent expressed concern that releasing the footage could endanger people in the building, potentially making the individual liable if harm occurred. The individual declined to provide identification, citing Texas law.
The agent asked the individual to stop filming and leave, but the individual refused, stating they were on a public street and had verified this with the city of Frisco. The agent clarified they were only asking the individual to stop filming them. The individual said they would continue filming for a few more minutes. The agent then identified themself. The individual refused to stop filming, referencing their earlier proof that it was lawful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a special agent with Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: How are you?
Speaker 0: Good. Our security officer here had some concern about you filming the building because it's a it's a government
Speaker 1: Leased property.
Speaker 0: Yes. Correct. Could you tell me what your interest is in the leasing of this property by the government?
Speaker 1: Just videoing and taking some photos. Okay. Why? For my use.
Speaker 0: Okay. Do you have authorization to do that?
Speaker 1: It's funny you mentioned that. I sure do.
Speaker 0: Okay. Can I have a copy of that, please?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. Well And
Speaker 0: what is this in conjunction with?
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna answer any more questions as to why I'm filming, but I will give you this. The Department of Homeland Security released a memo in February, basically saying it is perfectly lawful for an individual to film and take photos of the exterior of any federal building or any property leased by the federal government.
Speaker 0: Okay. And do you have identification on you?
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't understand why I need identification.
Speaker 0: Well, because if something were to happen in this building and there are government attorneys in this building Uh-huh. And there are all government agents in this building, then we know that for a fact that whatever information that you're putting out to the public k. You know, may have had put us at risk.
Speaker 1: Okay. Do understand that? Yeah. I'm not gonna give ID, but if you read that further, it'll tell you exactly every it's six pages long. I don't know if you wanna keep it, but that's your copy.
It just basically in a a short story says that, you know, it's not a suspicion of a crime for someone to take pictures of a federal building.
Speaker 0: I'm not saying it's a crime, but, again, if you release this to the public or the general public and somehow brings harm to people within this facility, obviously, you you know, you're the You're
Speaker 1: saying I'll be liable for that?
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: Okay. So if WFAA comes out here, the news agency, and films a story about the federal government or OIG or Homeland Security and they put it on their television station, you're saying the news is
Speaker 0: something at that point has already happened. They're not just gonna come out here and film it.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Right. But it doesn't mean they can't.
Speaker 0: No. That's correct. That and I'm not saying that it you're you can't. You've obviously Right. Me with the documentation that
Speaker 1: you Yeah. I just don't understand the connection of how you say if me, publishing something like a news agency does, it makes me responsible if something happens. That's that's not accurate. But
Speaker 0: Well, you're not telling me what's your
Speaker 1: That's your opinion, I may guess. But
Speaker 0: What what are you filming it for?
Speaker 1: Possibly a publication.
Speaker 0: A publication of what?
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not gonna go any further.
Speaker 0: Okay. So then why why is it that you cannot divulge your identity?
Speaker 1: I'm not required to. I mean, in Texas, unless I'm being arrested for a crime, I'm not required to identify myself.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Well, I would ask that you, you know, stop filming and leave the premise.
Speaker 1: I'm on I'm on a public street. I've already called Frisco and verified it's a public street. They do maintain it. Public Works already confirmed that with me. Since you're asking me to stop filming, I'm I'm I respect you, but I'm gonna decline that.
If you're ordering me to stop filming, that's a different story.
Speaker 0: I'm not ordering you to stop filming. I'm asking you to stop filming me and leave the premise.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: Because you're making people uncomfortable.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna leave the public street. I'm not gonna get in the street, but I'm gonna stay on the public easement that's accessible for me to walk. But I'm gonna probably get a few more minutes of footage and then I will leave.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's fine.
Speaker 1: You can take my picture. I don't care. But you said you you said your name was?
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. You don't you're not gonna divulge your
Speaker 1: No. But you there's a difference. There's a difference. You work for you work for the government. You are required to ID yourself.
Speaker 0: I have.
Speaker 1: If you're asking, I'm gonna say no.
Speaker 0: Right here. Yeah. Okay. I'm with Department of Homeland Security officer inspector. Okay.
Speaker 1: Perfect.
Speaker 0: Perfect. So I'm asking you to leave the premise and stop?
Speaker 1: You can't ask me to leave a public a public right away.
Speaker 0: I'm asking stop taping it.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna do that. If you wanna call Frisco, they'll come out here and they're gonna tell you that too.
Speaker 0: Alright. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: don't understand why you're you're you're asking me to stop when I'm had you handed you proof that it's okay.
Speaker 0: That's fine. That's fine.
Speaker 1: You want a selfie? We can take a selfie together. I don't care. Selfie. Okay.
Perfect.
Speaker 0: I'm good.
Speaker 1: Alright. Thank you.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Another deranged person! He should be easy to find ! Arrest him! https://t.co/jO12Ax195B
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person threw a pie at a Tesla robot, stating that Tesla's "shiny gimmicks" are a distraction from the company's destruction of livelihoods. They accuse Tesla's leader, Elon Musk, of being a "Hitler salute fascist" who is trying to bring Nazis back to power in Germany. They compare Tesla to the Nazi military industry of 80 years ago. The speaker claims that Musk and his "AFD friends" spread fascist propaganda on the platform X. They vow to counter this "agitation and lust for power" with a peaceful democratic revolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just threw a pie into the face of a Tesla robot because these ridiculous, shiny gimmicks will not distract from the fact that Tesla is destroying our livelihoods. The tech giant is spearheaded by the Hitler salute fascist, Elon Musk. He can buy out parties and is actively trying to bring Nazis back to power in Germany. Eighty Years ago, we had Nazi military industry, and now it's mega corporations like Tesla. On the platform X, Musk and his AFD friends spread their fascist propaganda.
All of this agitation and lust for power, we will encounter with a peaceful democratic revolution.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Can you imagine ever doing this? Just pull up to somebody’s house and start charging your car battery!?! WTH 🤦♀️ https://t.co/tAE5uYB88k
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person confronted someone charging their car in their driveway without permission. The person said it was their house and charger. The car owner said they were pregnant and their car was about to die. They added they saw the charger and thought it should be charging.
The car owner demanded the person stop recording them and their license plate, stating their husband is an attorney and the video shouldn't be posted anywhere. The person asked if they normally use other people's chargers. The car owner said they needed to go to the doctor and their car was dying.
The person asked them to unplug and leave, or they would call the police. The car owner threatened to call their husband. The person repeated their request to unplug and leave.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I help you? Oh,
Speaker 1: no. Thank you for charging my car.
Speaker 0: I see that, but this is my house, and it's my charger that he has.
Speaker 1: I know. It'll be, like, twenty minutes.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But that's really not you can't just pull up to someone in someone's driveway and use their charger. We didn't even ask for permission. I mean, maybe if you knocked on my door and asked me, I would've potentially let you, but you just pulled in my driveway. My wife's about to be home any minute now.
You're in her spot.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, I'm pregnant. My car is about to die. So I I don't tell you so I saw that they should be charging. Are you recording me right now?
Is that why your phone's recording
Speaker 0: right now? I am recording you because you're on my property, and I'm sorry that your car is about to die, but
Speaker 1: I mean Okay. So you have to stop recording me and stop recording my plates. My husband is an attorney, so you're not gonna put this video anywhere, so that's what you're doing with your phone.
Speaker 0: How I mean, do you normally do this? Do you normally pull up to people's houses and use their charges?
Speaker 1: Normally, my car isn't had to go to the doctor, and my car was dying on the whole. I'll be done in, like, one minute. It's really not that big of deal. Can you back away from my car keys? My driveway.
I understand that, but can you back away from my RV?
Speaker 0: Alright. I need you to unplug and drive away. Otherwise
Speaker 1: you to stop recording?
Speaker 0: I need you to unplug and drive away. Otherwise, I'm gonna call
Speaker 1: you, please. Okay.
Speaker 0: Well, gonna
Speaker 1: call my husband. Alright.
Speaker 0: That's fine. You can call you can call whoever you want. Please can you please just unplug and and drive away, please?
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is LA! WTH 🤦♀️ How sick is this? https://t.co/eGkAwSRAVg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hidden cameras captured LA Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) employees throwing away taxpayer-funded food meant for the homeless. Boxes of food, including fresh sandwiches, apples, and water, were seen being discarded into the trash. This occurred repeatedly, almost daily, despite the food being in unopened packages labeled "eat good food." One person stated that with tens of thousands of homeless individuals in LA, the food was not being distributed. Another person claimed this was a theft of taxpayer dollars, as employees are paid to serve and care for the homeless, and are instead throwing away valuable food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our hidden cameras caught employees with the LA Homeless Services Authority throwing cases of taxpayer funded food right into the dumpster. Food that's supposed to go to the homeless now going in the trash. You can see it here just come pouring out of the box, and not just once or twice. We saw it continuously inside the dumpster, boxes of food with fresh sandwiches for the homeless inside. It's a sandwich, an apple, and water.
We saw food thrown away almost every day, all unopened packages labeled eat good food. But despite the tens of thousands of homeless going hungry on the streets of LA, no one got to eat this food because we saw LASA employees like this woman just throw it in the trash.
Speaker 1: It's a theft of taxpayer dollars. These people are being paid to go out and service and take care of people. So not only are they stealing their pay, but they're throwing away good valuable food for people who have nothing to eat.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Oh now she wants peace and forgiveness after destroying someone’s property. Actions have consequences. 😬😛 https://t.co/GYEdjq1VYx
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual is being confronted about a possible violation of student policy, which was caught on video. The individual confirms they are a full-time student returning in the summer. The other person says that after six months of good behavior and community service, the judge will drop the charges. The individual expresses concern that this will negatively impact their studies and future growth. They ask if there's room for second chances or redemption, but the other person states it's too late, as they had a chance not to do what they did. The other person calls the situation a teachable moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come on.
Speaker 1: I'm allowed to say whatever the fuck I want.
Speaker 0: Come
Speaker 1: on. Come
Speaker 0: He told you to stop.
Speaker 1: Hold up. Come on.
Speaker 0: Come on. It's right there. Video.
Speaker 1: And what? Alright. So what what just occurred? He's making me mad. Okay.
Did you damage his sign? I have it on video. No. Did I can see that you guys have it on video. Alright.
Do you have an ID on you? Yes. Alright.
Speaker 0: I'm Violation of student policy.
Speaker 1: I mean, 20 or something. That point three will also be off. But oh, I just want to
Speaker 0: After good behavior, six months in community service, the judge will drop it.
Speaker 1: I am a full time student. I'm coming back here in the summertime.
Speaker 0: Nope. Next time you'll think not to do it.
Speaker 1: The one he was marking out on because I still have him on a ten thirty one b. Dude, like, you can't find any, like, peace in your heart and understanding for
Speaker 0: I will let I will tell I will tell the judge. Please. Yeah. Please. I will tell the judge, and he'll drop the charges after six months and you do community service.
It
Speaker 1: really does cause a damper in my studies and my future, though. No. Don't you think?
Speaker 0: What I wanted to do
Speaker 1: kind of don't you think it kind of gets in the way of, like, me growing and becoming as an individual? Like, I still have yet to learn. Maybe one day I'll change my mind. Educate you.
Speaker 0: It's a teachable moment.
Speaker 1: What is a teachable moment?
Speaker 0: This. Right now.
Speaker 1: You don't offer, like, second chances, redemption.
Speaker 0: It it's too late now. That I mean, seriously. Too late.
Speaker 1: It's not too late. It's actually not too late.
Speaker 0: You you had a chance not to do what you did.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Bidens pardons going bye bye! 👋 https://t.co/G9dG0HoK4h
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is beyond anything I could possibly imagine! All this corruption. So 90-99 over 6 million people. Almost 48 million are 100-109 years old. That’s not even the end of it . Just blows my mind. 1 person was even 360 years old https://t.co/zPXnnZYrLc
Video Transcript AI Summary
To me, Elon Musk is a patriot. When it comes to Ukraine, that's a big deal. People are dying.
Looking at social security, from 1990 to 1999, there were six million people, but then 4 million people lived to be 100 to 109 years old. Then there were 3 million people from 20 to 29 years old. The record is someone lived to 127. And then from 130 to 139, there were thousands.
Then there's money being spent like $520 million for a consultant on the environment in Africa and $25 million to promote biodiversity in Colombia. These are massive numbers on things nobody's heard about. Then there's millions going to voter turnout in other countries.
But when I saw the Social Security numbers, millions of people over 100 years old, everybody knows that's not so. It's a very corrupt country, but we're figuring it out. If you take all of those millions of people off Social Security, all of a sudden we have a very powerful Social Security.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, Elon Musk role is that Yeah. Yeah. Elon is, to me, a patriot. So, you know, you could call him an employee. You could call him a consultant.
You could call him whatever you want. But he's a patriot. I mean, look at the kind of things I just said. Just write it down. Just in case that question got asked.
Right? And which I'm surprised it took so long, actually. But you know what? Ukraine's a bigger deal because people are dying by the thousands a week. Thousands.
But look at this. From '90 to '99, Social Security. Six million '50 '4 thousand people. Well, that's okay. Maybe that's possible.
You know, '90 to 9099, maybe it's possible. It's still a lot of people, though, with that. But people that live to a hundred to a hundred and nine, four million seven hundred and 30 four thousand. Wow. That's a lot.
That means over a hundred years old. They have 4,000,000 people? I don't know. I don't know too many. I know people that are doing great in their nineties, but not too many people over a hundred.
But over a hundred and 20, from a 20 years old, people that are 20 years old up to a 29. Three million four hundred and 70 two thousand people. Wow. You know that can't possibly be because the record is like I think it's one person, a woman, lived to a 27, but they have 3,472. Okay.
But now we're going really in. People from a hundred and 30 years old to a 39 year old. 03/6000. Wow. I wonder if people are getting paid with all this.
I mean, are these checks and that's what we're checking right now. People from a hundred and 40 years old to a 49 years old, 3,542,000. Hundred and 40 years old and beyond. Now now we're really going because we're looking to break the record by twenty five years. People from a 50 years old to a 59 years old.
1,345,000. These are in the by the way, these are in the computer files. These are this is what they do well. They're super I asked Elon, who are these Doge people? He said, they're super brilliant computer people and they love the country.
It's simple. Wait a minute. People from a 60 years old to a 69 years, a 21,000. So a 60 year old people. 70 to a 79,000.
Six thousand owe 87. But now let's go into the real numbers. From 200 to 209 years old, 879 people. From 210 years old, I haven't met any of them. And if I did, I'd I would bless them.
I would I would worship the ground they walk on. Two hundred and 10 to 219 years old, 866. From 220 years old to 229 years old, 1,039. And then, you have two people, from 240 years old to 249 years old, one person. And there's one person that's 360 years old.
That's just that. And then where's the money being spent? Right? Let's go into that for just a second. Five hundred and twenty million dollars for a consultant on the environment.
It's called environmental, social, and governance investments in Africa and mobilized private sector resources, $520,000,000. Somebody got $520,000,000 for an environmental sounds like an environmental study. Most I've always been one that paid a lot of money for my environmental studies, but they you know, I paid like $50,000 not $520,000,000 5 hundred and 20 million dollars for ESG. Twenty five million dollars to promote biodiversity, conservation, and promote illicit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behavior in the country of Colombia. Well, it's nice.
25,000,000 to go into Colombia for something that nobody ever heard of. $40,000,000 to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. 40,000,000. 40 2 million dollars for Johns Hopkins, great place to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda. Forty Two Million.
What about us? What about social change in our country? $70,000,000 for a center at Purdue to research university sourced evidence based solutions to developmental challenges. I mean, these are massive numbers on things that nobody ever heard about. $10,000,000 for Mozambique voluntary medical male circumcisions.
Ten million dollars for circumcisions in another country. $9,700,000 for UC Berkeley to develop a co a cohort of Cambodian youth with enterprise driven skills. In other words, let's teach them something about enterprise. What about our people? Can we teach them about enterprise?
$2,300,000 for strengthening independent voices in Cambodia. Thirty Two Million Dollars to the Prague Civil Society Center, which is a very liberal group of people. Wonder how much of that money came back to the people that approved it. $14,000,000 for improving public procurement in Serbia. Four Hundred And Eighty Six Million Dollars to the consortium for elections and political process strengthening, including 22,000,000 for inclusive and participatory political process in Moldova and $21,000,000 for voter turnout in India.
Well, why are we giving $21,000,000 to India? They got a lot of money. They're the one of the highest taxing countries in the world in terms of us. We can hardly get in there because their tariffs are so high. I have a lot of respect for India.
I have a lot of respect for the prime minister. He just left, as you know, two days ago. But we given $21,000,000 for voter turnout. It's voter turnout in India. What about, like, voter turnout here?
We've done that, I guess. We did 500,000,000, didn't we? It's called the lockboxes. $20,000,000 for fiscal federalism in Nepal. Listen to these numbers.
These are this is all fraud. $19,000,000 for biodiversity conservation in Nepal, One Point Five Million Dollars for voter confidence. We want to give them confidence in Liberia, Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali, Two Point Five Million Dollars for inclusive democracies in South Africa. Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia is doing very well.
They're doing a lot better than we do in the schools, aren't they? $2,000,000 to develop sustainable recycling models to increase socioeconomic cohesion among marginalized communities in Kosovo and, Eskali and in Egypt. We're talking about hundreds of billions of dollars. I could I could by the way, I could read this all day long. I could go on all day long and you'll see hundreds of billions of dollars and we're doing it.
But when I saw the social security numbers, I said, wow, that's really something. So we have let's just go above 100 years old. We have millions and millions of people over a hundred years old. Everybody knows that's not so. We have a very, corrupt country.
Very corrupt country. And it's a sad thing to say, but, we're figuring it out. Now the good thing about Social Security and what I read is if you take all of those numbers off, because they're obviously fraudulent or incompetent, But if you take all of those millions of people off Social Security, all of a sudden we have a very powerful Social Security with people that are 80 and 70 and 90, but not 200 years old. You know? So it's a very positive thing.
How about over here? Yeah. Please.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
How does Margaret still have a job? https://t.co/6bQo16jOC4
Video Transcript AI Summary
CBS likely didn't air the full Rubio interview because of comments like the one about Liz Cheney. The media is misrepresenting what Trump meant when he said he'd give Cheney a gun. He wasn't suggesting violence.
The full context reveals he meant she's eager for war while safely in Washington. He's saying, let's see how eager you are for war when you're the one in combat. It's a common point made by both parties, that it's easy to advocate for war from a safe distance. Trump's language might be unconventional, but the media's portrayal is unfair and egregious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This explains why CBS didn't air the full version of this interview with secretary Rubio.
Speaker 1: That sound by the moment ago from Donald Trump talking about training guns on the face of Liz Cheney. That's not what he said. Mario, you guys know that. Come on. May everybody knows exactly what he was saying.
What he was saying is you're so much in favor of war. You played a piece of the sound bite because in another piece of it, he said he would give her a gun to go stand in conflict as well. You don't normally give a gun to someone that is gonna be facing a firing squad, which is what much of the media made it sound like. The point he was making is not a new point. It is a point that has been made by people in both parties for decades.
And that is, you're all for war and it's easy to be for war when you're in some fancy building and you're safe and sound in Washington DC. Let's see how much you are for war when you yourself get deployed into combat. That's the point that he was making, that he uses language that maybe is not what we typically hear from someone that works at a think tank. But I think it's truly not just unfair, it's it's egregious.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Omg 😳! Lord help! https://t.co/a1M6hy9wY2
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't have access to reproductive health, and while I haven't had an abortion, I know many women who have. It feels like a rite of passage into womanhood that I'm denied and will never experience. It's not a prerequisite, but it feels like a rite of passage in some ways. I cope by talking to friends online. There's no real organized community for women who aren't able to have an abortion, but we connect and support each other when we can.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We don't have access to reproductive health.
Speaker 1: Now have you ever had an abortion?
Speaker 0: No. I haven't. And, you know, and and I'm torn because it's like, you know, I know a lot of women who who who have gone through abortion, and it's almost like a rite of passage to womanhood.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: And it's like that that's something that I'm denied and that I will never be able to experience. But, it it's it's I mean, definitely not, a a prerequisite to have an abortion, but it is a rite of passage in certain ways.
Speaker 1: Right. So how how do you cope with do you have you talked to your therapist about this or anything like that, or are there support communities where other women who haven't who aren't able to have an abortion can kinda is there a community that you can find solace in?
Speaker 0: It it is a small one, but it's nothing organized. And it's more of like a one online that you you just talk to your friends with. But
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe this airline kicked a family off their flight just to give the seats to crew members. WTH! Thanks to @amybarnes_usa for sharing more details. A witness recorded the incident, confirming they were indeed asked to leave.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This airline kicked this family off their flight because they wanted crew to take the seats. WTH 🤦♀️ https://t.co/yuQsZr6XF2
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been waiting three hours for answers. This is unacceptable. I need someone to talk to me and provide answers immediately. I can't leave; my kids are sleeping. My requests for answers have been ignored, making me feel uncomfortable. This situation is wrong and needs to be addressed. We've all been waiting, including me with my children. I need someone to come with me to get answers. I can't go home until this is resolved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I need to wait.
Speaker 1: We've been waiting for three hours. No. I'm not getting
Speaker 0: no. No. This is really wrong. Absolutely not. I'm not.
I'm not. That's so wrong.
Speaker 1: No. No. We need to talk to some people then. I can talk
Speaker 0: to somebody. Then we'll be getting answers right here. I can't do that.
Speaker 1: And that, I will have to bring OPD.
Speaker 0: That's fine. I need answers. That's
Speaker 1: fine. And I have to explain to everybody.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. This is so wrong. This is very big to change. Very big to change. Okay.
Well, I need somebody to come talk to me to give answers because my kids are sleeping and I've been waiting. I've been I am not stupid. I asked you for answers because I didn't. You couldn't give me answers and I was making me feel uncomfortable. No.
I need answers. No. I need answers right here.
Speaker 1: She's been literally collectively all of us have been waiting.
Speaker 0: Ma'am, I need for you to head down with me. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: You've been waiting with her children.
Speaker 0: Oh, and this one doesn't matter to me. I can't get on. I can't go home.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Adding more to the story. Thank you @amybarnes_usa for sharing this with me. Yes they were kicked off. This person videotaped the incident. She says they were asking people to get off. https://t.co/1wz5KLJ46L
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is unbelievable! My kids were asleep, and I'm pretty sure the flight was overbooked. They offered passengers $100 plus new tickets to take a later flight, but no one took it. Then, they kicked a woman and her kids off for simply asking about the delay. Another woman who defended her was also removed.
I was terrified of being kicked off, especially since I couldn't afford another flight. I started recording because I thought it was outrageous that she was removed for asking a question. I felt pressured to stay quiet to avoid the same fate.
They gave us $80 towards a future Frontier flight, but I'll never fly with them again. It was completely unacceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is very big. Very big. Okay. Why do somebody this is how I'm gonna get in. This is my kids are sleeping, and I bet we I bet the flight was overbooked.
Yes. It was. And, actually, at the gate, they were offering, like, a bonus, like, a hundred dollars plus new flight tickets or whatever on the next flight out. I don't think anyone took it. And as soon as they kicked, this woman and her kids off, they kicked off another woman for standing up for her, her friend.
They kicked her off and her kids. I was scared that they were literally gonna kick us off the flight, and I didn't have the extra thousand dollars to book another flight through, like, another airline. Otherwise, I would have totally stood up and I thought it was bullshit and that's why I started recording. I didn't believe that she should have been kicked off with her kids for literally asking a question about, like, our flight being delayed. I felt like I had to be silenced and comply with whatever they said because I didn't wanna get kicked off, with my kids.
You know? They, like, gave us a couple, like, money back to $80 towards your next flight with Frontier. And I'm like, I'm never flying with you guys again. What are you talking about?
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Here we go. It’s about time the truth is spoken about and way past time for lawsuits. Credit @TheChiefNerd https://t.co/Kz325Yy32Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking penalties and damages for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit is part of a multistate effort involving five states. The complaint details several misleading claims, including that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women despite evidence of adverse events and miscarriages. Pfizer also denied links between its vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis, despite known risks. Additionally, Pfizer claimed its vaccine was effective against variants and could stop transmission, but later admitted it had not studied transmission. The suit emphasizes that Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to its vaccine's success in Kansas, where over 3.3 million doses were administered. The case focuses on marketing practices, asserting that Pfizer's actions violated its obligation to provide truthful information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for being here today. We brought together this press conference to make the following announcement. And that is today, Kansas is filing a civil suit against the Pfizer Corporation under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act seeking enhanced civil monetary penalties, damages and injunctive relief from misleading and deceptive statements made in marketing its COVID-nineteen vaccine. Pfizer also violated previous consent judgments with the state of Kansas in which Pfizer promised never to use deceptive information to market their products. Kansas' case is the first of a multistate collaboration with Kansas being the first of 5 states to file suit.
Before I go further, let me put this in context. As we all know, during the COVID 19 pandemic, there was a great deal of panic and anxiety. Many people who were elderly or who suffered from various medical conditions had already died when the vaccines became available. And when that time came, when the vaccines became available, every one of us had to make 2 decisions. Am I going to take the vaccine?
And if so, which vaccine will I choose to take? And these decisions were being made in a hurry. In some ways, you could say, even being made under duress. In such an environment, it is imperative that Kansans making that decision receive the truth. They needed the truth.
All Americans needed the truth. And in multiple respects, Pfizer did not provide the truth. Much of the information, in this lawsuit came out as a result of a FOIA lawsuit seeking information from Pfizer that still had not been made public. And it was only a result of that effort that some of the in information in this lawsuit, is available. I urge everyone to read the 69 page complaint, that goes into great detail about the specific statements that were made and the misleading nature of those statements made to Kansas consumers.
The following is a quick summary of, I think, some of the 4 most egregious examples of misleading the public in Kansas. Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women. However, in February of 2021, Pfizer possessed reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer's COVID-nineteen vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an adverse event and more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of the vaccination. Pfizer also possessed information from its own October 2020 study on pregnancy in rats indicating that its COVID-nineteen vaccine was likely linked to infertility, loss of litters and stillborn offspring.
Number 2, safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis. Fire Pfizer consistently denied any evidence of a connection or safety signal between its COVID 19 vaccine and myocarditis or pericarditis. Indeed, on January 18, 2023, when asked whether its vaccine caused strokes or myocarditis, Pfizer Chairman and CEO, Alan Bourla, stated, quote, we've not seen a single signal, although we have distributed billions of doses, end quote, a signal that he was referring to as a safety signal, which refers to a negative consequence. However, as Pfizer knew, the United States government the United States military, foreign governments, and others had found that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine caused myocarditis and pericarditis. Number 3, effectiveness regarding variant variance.
Pfizer also claimed that its COVID 19 vaccine protected against COVID 19 variants even though data available at the time showed Pfizer's vaccine was effective less than half the time against variants. Finally, transmission. Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccination stopped transmission of COVID 19. Pfizer later admitted that it never even studied transmission of it after its recipients received the vaccine and whether they could say it stopped transmission. After making these misleading statements, Pfizer also engaged, in some censorship attempts.
Emails revealed that Pfizer officials coordinated with social media platforms to censor any speech critical of Pfizer's COVID-nineteen vaccine safety and effectiveness. It should also be noted that Pfizer elected not to join the federal government's vaccine development program known as Operation Warp Speed and declined that development funding. When asked about that, Pfizer's CEO, Albert Bourla, said Pfizer did not participate in the program in order to, quote, liberate, end quote, Pfizer's scientists and to avoid government oversight of its vaccine development. He also said, quote, they want reports. I don't want to have any of that, end quote, referring to they.
When he said they, he's referring to the federal government. Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to success in marketing its vaccine in Kansas. By February of 2024, Pfizer had delivered over 3,300,000 doses of its vaccine in the state of Kansas. This is this accounted for over 60% of all vaccine doses given in the state of Kansas. The suit is being filed today.
And as I mentioned before, it is part of a multistate effort in which more suits may follow depending on Pfizer's reaction. This is about marketing products to the public. As I think most people know, the federal government conferred immunity on the vaccine manufacturers for tort suits, seeking damages from injuries they received. But that did not free any of the vaccine manufacturers, from their obligation to not mislead the public or make deceptive statements in marketing it. So this is, principally about the marketing efforts, that were made and how they and and how they contradicted what the company knew.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Good morning everyone 🙋♀️☕️ So this person with the blue hair decided to come to Florida from Oregon . How do you think that worked out for him? https://t.co/FdkyTAwKbq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a picture of a man with blue hair who has a criminal history involving five counts of child abuse. Originally from Washington County, Oregon, he moved to Lakeland, Florida. His distinctive hair color made him easier to identify. Our team apprehended him, and Washington County confirmed they want him back to face charges. Justice prevails once again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Now I'm gonna show you a picture of a guy who you know has to have a hitch in his giddy up just the way he looks. Look at there. Old blue hair himself. That's right.
Now he's originally, I guess, from Washington County, Oregon, where he committed crimes against children. 5 counts of child abuse. That's right. So he moves to Lakeland, Florida, Jamestown Avenue in Lakeland. Well, we don't like child abusers from any place no matter what color your hair is, But it makes you easier to identify if you'll color code yourself.
Blue hair on a goober smoocher like this means there's outstanding child abuse warrants. Our team took him in custody and Washington County, Oregon said, oh, yeah. We want him. We're gonna come get him. He's out of the county.
Good guys win again. Take care.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Wow if you haven’t seen this clip with Pete Hegseth interview with Shawn Ryan it’s definitely worth a watch! He talks about how bad our government schools have become over time. Get your children out if you can! 🫡✊🔥 https://t.co/OK1WDnlEjc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Get your kids out of government schools if you can. The education system has been federalized over the last century, influenced by atheists, Marxists, and humanists who reject Christianity. They aim to manipulate children's thinking and disrupt family relationships by removing God from schools. Historically, the Bible and prayer were part of education until a misinterpretation of the First Amendment led to their removal. The pledge of allegiance, originally written by a socialist minister, was altered to include "under God" during the Cold War. The education system promotes democracy, which the founders opposed, and uses language manipulation to create alternate realities that increase control and power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get out. Get your kids out of government school systems right now if you can. If you have any way. You know, save money, move, get a second job, don't take the vacation, sell the boat, whatever. Drive for Uber.
Figure out what you need to do to get your kid out of the government school system because it's about saving your kid right now. Mhmm. So, what I wanna know is what's being pumped into the minds of those kids. And what you realize when you pull the curtain back over a 100 years is the entire pipeline of our education has system has been federalized intentionally. And taken over not just by, like, left lefties or or or technocrats or bureaucrats.
Everyone you meet through that time line who's pushing hard on the shoulder of of on the plow of education is an atheist, a Marxist, or a socialist, or a humanist. There are a lot of them are humanists, which is What's a humanist? Humanist is basically completely rejects Christianity or faith at all. And so it's all humanity is at the center of good and evil, right and wrong. It's effectively secularism pause posited as an alternative religion to Christianity.
Oh. So it'll it'll find politics as an avenue, and so humanists are often socialists or Marxists or communists in alongside being a humanist. But it's it's the worship of of mankind as the highest being as opposed to god as the highest being. So they're all that that's the train of people pushing this educational philosophy. And when you I used to think it started in the sixties.
It actually goes back to the progressive era and even before that. But they very intentionally the one thing they knew they had to remove from the beginning was god. God had to come out of the schools because god was the immovable object that prevented their utopian schemes. They wanted you know, if you wanna manipulate children, if you wanna change the way they think, rewire the relationship of families, you have to get at the God thing because the the garden and the sin in the garden is all, disrupts those utopian schemes. And so the early progressives, communists, Marxists, very intentionally worked hard in their in creating systems that slowly but surely removed God.
Because if you went into a public public school, government school in America in the 18 fifties or 18 seventies and 18 thirties, the bible's in there, Prayer's in there. Scripture reading's in there. It's all in there. So it's a modern court that made all those things unconstitutional based on a misreading of the first amendment and freedom of religion versus freedom from religion, and the progressives have exploited that. And then the the process from there to they used patriotism, falsely to sort of get rid of god.
And then once they built an allegiance to state and and what that was is they replaced basically the cross in the bible with the flag and a pledge. The original pledge of allegiance was written by a socialist minister, and it did not include under god. The pledge of allegiance originally didn't include under god. Eisenhower added under god in the fifties when we were fighting the godless communists. So you you have a flag and you have a pledge, a pledge of allegiance to the republic.
By the way, we're a republic, not a democracy, and our education system pumps democracy down people's throats. And our founders couldn't stand democracy, but that's a whole another a whole another ballgame. The left always changes language. They change language to change to create an alternate reality, to manipulate human beings into whatever utopian scheme of 15 minutes ago they wanna advocate for that increases their power and control. And they saw the government school system as the best entity to do that in, and so they focused and pushed.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
💥This is very disturbing! When you thought things could not get worse well here it is , so sád for the people of NC! 🙏🙏 https://t.co/f9rAU5MMvK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Allegedly, new reports from North Carolina and Tennessee indicate that people are getting sick following recent devastation and homelessness. A nuclear fuel station near Asheville supposedly had training barrels washed into the river. However, reports now claim it was a semi-truck full of nuclear fuel buried 10 to 20 feet under the mud.
While it's unconfirmed if this is making people sick, ruptured sewers, dead animals, and dead bodies are causing contamination. Sixty people on the mountain are reportedly sick with an unknown illness. A man who brought cadaver dogs to the Carolinas now allegedly has 4 dead dogs and 6 actively dying. Horses rescued from the river are also very sick, with blood work revealing contamination. People are advised to stay out of the mud and away from the water due to contamination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, guys. We got some new alleged reports coming out of North Carolina and Tennessee. And since the main stream news is not covering this, we definitely have to go with alleged reports. This is all alleged, but this is new news and it's extremely important, so pay attention. Not only do we have the complete devastation and the homeless issue, People are without homes, they are without power, but now they are getting sick.
Apparently, there is a nuclear fuel station about an hour and a half outside of Asheville. Now originally, they had said that there were training barrels that had got washed away into the river, into the water. However, they are now allegedly stating that these were not training barrels, and it was actually a semi full of nuclear fuel that got buried 10 to 20 feet under the mud. So they have verified that this truck is in the water, in the mud with all of these barrels of fuel. Now, that is not to say that is what is making people sick.
However, it could definitely be contributing to it. You've got sewers that have ruptured. You've got just, dead animals, dead bodies, and everything is contaminated. So allegedly, there is about 60 people up on the mountain right now that are sick with something that they just don't know what they're sick with. A man that brought 10 cadaver dogs to the Carolinas now has 4 dead dogs and 6 actively dying.
The horses that were brought out of the river, they were also very sick. And so they started doing blood work on these animals and finding out that they have all kinds of stuff in their blood, they are very sick. So not only are we dealing with complete devastation, now we are dealing with contamination that is making the animals and the people sick, allegedly. So I needed to get this out to you, we need to spread this far and wide, stay out of the mud. If you can stay out of the mud, stay out of the mud, stay away from the water, it is contaminated.
Yeah. I guess that's it for now guys. And as I progress with this story, I will update you guys. Stay safe. Godspeed.
Talk to you soon.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is how people in Appalachia roll! She’s a tough cookie! God bless her! 🙏♥️ https://t.co/R3iqVpvbRR
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
I realize this is 8 mins long but it’s unbelievable how inept or more evîl you pick one! This is Glenn Beck and Cory Mills talking to FEMA! It just blew my mind! I am so pîssed! 😡😡 https://t.co/4Cx35ST1D2
Video Transcript AI Summary
A team is in the area to help people register for financial assistance and other aid, such as housing and generators. They are prioritizing getting people into the system quickly. The team arrived yesterday but lacked connectivity. Today they have connectivity and are registering people. Tomorrow, they will move the unit near the car wash.
The team distributes flyers and encourages people to apply online, where they can upload documents. Special needs assistance is the first aid being distributed, with more to come after damage verification. Team members are from various states, including Montana, Florida, and Texas.
A point of concern is how people without power or media access will know about the assistance. Door-to-door assistance is handled by a different department and is "above" the current team's purview. The team was advised to increase visibility by positioning themselves on the main road with signage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, ma'am. How are you?
Speaker 1: This is Patricia.
Speaker 2: Hi, Patricia. I'm Glenn.
Speaker 3: I'm Glenn.
Speaker 2: This is congressman Mills.
Speaker 0: Hello. How are you, ma'am? Good.
Speaker 2: So, we're wondering we just asked when do you guys go door to door? He was telling that
Speaker 3: After we get the general stuff done, you know, we gotta hit the mass people first, wherever the mass people are. So the mass people are here. Let's get them into the system as quickly as possible. Once we get the mass system, then we start going door to door.
Speaker 2: K. How I mean, how how do people know you're here?
Speaker 3: We're we just got here.
Speaker 2: Oh, you just got here?
Speaker 3: We were here yesterday.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And today is our first day, with this unit.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And then tomorrow, we're gonna move the unit up by the car wash.
Speaker 1: Oh.
Speaker 3: Yesterday, we couldn't do anything besides give them the information because we didn't have any Wi Fi.
Speaker 2: Right.
Speaker 0: I I will say unless there's someone who's we got lucky enough. Glenn actually spotted it before I did. But I think even having this vehicle more towards the front of the road where people even know that it exists Yeah. With for visibility, with people coming by might actually Yeah.
Speaker 2: We were in a we were in a van with 8 people. I was the only one that saw it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah. No.
Speaker 3: No. That's what we're gonna do.
Speaker 2: That's what
Speaker 3: we gotta do. We just needed a temporary spot to turn around and get things up and running.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Good.
Speaker 3: And, the guy that's running this facility here, I spoke with the manager here. He said this would be a good spot. The guy that's running the parking lot is a different guy. I didn't know that. He said, so the car wash would be better.
And I was like, boy, that's really smart.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Okay. So that's where we're gonna be set up tomorrow.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And we should be doing registrations. Well, we'll be here between 9 and 10. We're all coming in from Charlotte. He'll be here a little bit earlier, and then we're we'll start tearing down, about 5 o'clock so that we can get out of here.
Speaker 2: Great.
Speaker 3: Because, we don't necessarily go door to door. It's not my cadre anyways. There are there's 23 different cadres.
Speaker 0: Oh, I know. I understand how the bureaucratic levels of departments work.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So And
Speaker 0: and they don't always work clear together.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We we concentrate in getting people into the system so that we can get them financial assistance right away. And it's happening like that.
Speaker 1: That's right. What are the Good.
Speaker 3: Are you guys recording me?
Speaker 2: Yeah. We did. He's filming. Filming. Yeah.
We're here. He's filming us.
Speaker 3: So, you know, one of the first things that are coming out is is, special needs assistance.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 3: That's just a little bit of a hint of the account. People are gonna think automatically that that's all that it's gonna get. No. That's not the case. That's just the beginning.
That is just the beginning because then there's going to be another much, much larger drop, and then there's going to be other things. But we still have to go through and verify the damages that have been done Yeah. Yeah. You know, and that you own the house and that you are the renter.
Speaker 0: Limit the amount of fraud we can see in other areas. We we we
Speaker 2: We we got it, Oscar. Thank you
Speaker 3: very much. Thank you. We are all from different parts of the United States. I'm from Montana.
Speaker 2: I'm from Florida. Really? Florida.
Speaker 1: I'm from
Speaker 3: Texas. Oh, Where are you guys
Speaker 2: from? What?
Speaker 3: Where are you guys
Speaker 2: from? I'm from Tennessee.
Speaker 1: I'm working on Who? Hey.
Speaker 2: It's our official birthday. Bunch of bull crap bad ones.
Speaker 1: They got here yesterday.
Speaker 0: The official Thursday. We're tucked away almost 8 weeks.
Speaker 2: No. She no. She's where the masses are.
Speaker 3: But 9
Speaker 2: She's where the masses are.
Speaker 3: Don't worry. 9 to 5.
Speaker 0: Well, but again, though, it still hasn't answered the question just that. Adam was sitting
Speaker 1: at the area. He was on.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No.
Speaker 2: She she was up she's where the masses are. Can't you see the masses lined up? They're not even in the right side of the parking lot. You wanna be where the masses are, you put up signs at least or or stupid little table in front of where the food is. Well, but but but When she said We go
Speaker 0: But then your question, you said, when? He goes, well, that's above my head.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And then so let me let
Speaker 2: let me talk to my let you talk to my manager. Oh my gosh. Oh my gosh. And then the manager said, no. We don't go door to door.
I don't know when that happens. That's a different department. Oh my
Speaker 1: god. You're kidding. No. Exactly what was that?
Speaker 2: No. It was that
Speaker 0: that is When when Glenn went silent, I knew he was done with this.
Speaker 2: Oh, I was sent. Done from the very beginning. I I I I I could see these guys.
Speaker 0: But, again, though, you wouldn't have even spotted them, Glenn.
Speaker 1: I know. Good. I know.
Speaker 0: Who knows that they were back here? And, again, my recommendation, I thought was pretty common sense, which is, hey, for more visibility, maybe you put yourself on the main road.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: You want to serve the quote, unquote masses.
Speaker 1: Let's go ahead
Speaker 0: and get mass visibility.
Speaker 2: The food and the stuff is down there. Their truck, which just looks like a commuter, it doesn't have a sign, hey. Register for money, register for help. Just a communications truck. Right.
And 2 people sitting at the table.
Speaker 1: If you saw that, would you
Speaker 0: know that you're signed up for a fee?
Speaker 1: Nope. That's no idea. I didn't know it.
Speaker 2: Well, that's the sign up for fee?
Speaker 3: Yes. That's it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's it.
Speaker 3: You found it. No.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 0: Yes. It is. No way.
Speaker 2: That's what their selves in the quiet corner in
Speaker 1: the That's right.
Speaker 2: And and you're ready? They said, we said, how how do you people know? Well, they're watching TV and they're listening
Speaker 3: right now. They don't get home.
Speaker 0: That's what they literally said. I don't
Speaker 3: think I said I said, so let me get the straight Glen Beck.
Speaker 0: Well, they have to move Well, moving chairs.
Speaker 3: See them
Speaker 1: in traffic.
Speaker 0: It's the first one you've seen. Right? In Nashville.
Speaker 2: Hey, guys. Doing? Good. How are you? Alright.
Speaker 1: What can I do for you?
Speaker 2: Well, I just I'm I'm Glenn, and this is, congressman Mills.
Speaker 1: Congressman Mills, how are you
Speaker 2: doing, man? We're just wondering what you guys are up to. What's So
Speaker 1: they're all dishing today, which gives us connectivity, complete connectivity so we can do a lot more than we've been doing.
Speaker 0: K.
Speaker 1: Because every all of our equipment now. So they're registering. They're telling them over there. We're over here. I think tomorrow, they're moving us over there somewhere more, but not exactly And what are you doing?
So What is it? Actually registering people for systems. Okay. So this is
Speaker 2: the check thing? Getting them in the system. Not
Speaker 1: just a check thing. The housing, checking generator.
Speaker 2: Okay. So the So
Speaker 1: it was the housing and
Speaker 3: everything. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Good. As well. Good. But we're basically getting him in the system.
Speaker 0: And you guys got here today?
Speaker 1: We've been here for 2 days. We got here yesterday. Yesterday, we didn't have any connectivity, so we took 28100 people as near as we could count coming through the food distribution line and through the gas station station and handed them all the suppliers. We didn't have flyers to get them. Our flyers weren't here, but they could take pictures of our fire, which told they could go online.
They could make a farm to go, and the giraffe could go online just to get them in the system. Also, tell them they're gonna be here eventually. They'll be at the ARC located nearby at the Center Recovery Center,
Speaker 0: and
Speaker 1: they go there for help. But the app is great. The app they can go on, they they can upload documents through the app, so they don't need us.
Speaker 0: That's a question. And not stopping. One of the biggest problems though is that most people don't have the ability, 1, to even get on their phones to verify what is going on. How does people even know
Speaker 1: that this location exists? So that would be the news media's job to
Speaker 0: tell But they don't have power.
Speaker 1: None of the news media. Well, I mean, I watch the news. No. The people who Oh, yeah. Yeah.
The female assistants don't have power supplies. So how they watch the TV? You would be surprised. They sit in their cars to charge their phones and listen to the radio. They're very very well that's how they knew the distribution center was here.
So they knew were told to come here to get those supplies, and they don't know we're here really until we they get here and we tell them to see us over here.
Speaker 0: But it is possible though that those who won are either cut off in the location because they're still rebuilding roads, obviously, that cable or resin or doesn't have power won't know about even Right. Where this truck exists or if it
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. Right. And there is no way actually. So we're DSA disaster survivors sometimes. Right?
So what we actually do, we work items like these, and we actually go door to door. We go door to door and try to knock on every door in the county. And we go at the direction usually of the emergency manager because the fire chiefs are gonna tell us where people are. Yeah. Things are devastated.
So we literally go door to door.
Speaker 2: So when does that start?
Speaker 1: That's way above my head.
Speaker 3: So,
Speaker 1: you're talking to Pion Eddie.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: You're not talking do you wanna talk to my crew do you wanna talk to my crew lead? Here, let me get my crew lead for you. She can she might have some answers.
Speaker 0: But, again, I do it back to my point, which is that okay. So I need to fill out a form. I need to scan a flyer.
Speaker 2: Yeah. How
Speaker 0: do I know this exists? Oh, the local media. Okay. Well, they don't have power. Yeah.
They might not have a vehicle. Right.
Speaker 2: So what about I saw a lot of them washed
Speaker 1: away. That's right.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Dan is spot on as usual! Wow! 🤯 smh 🤦♀️ https://t.co/jnT9GMub76
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a comparison of ICE to the Ku Klux Klan.
One speaker defines the KKK as a domestic terrorist group that used fear and force to change the political environment based on race and ethnicity.
Another speaker asks if they are aware of the perception of how ICE's power and discretion are being used to enforce laws and if they see any parallels to the KKK. The speaker responds that they see no parallel between what is constitutionally mandated in enforcing the law and the KKK. They deny seeing ICE in the same category as the KKK.
The first speaker urges listeners to vote and bring 10 people with them, suggesting the other speaker could be the next president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here she is comparing the ICE, our heroic people in ICE, trying to keep illegals out of country to the Ku Klux Klan. Check this out.
Speaker 1: Ku Klux Klan. The KKK.
Speaker 2: Well, the the Klan was, what we would call today a domestic terrorist group.
Speaker 1: Why? Why would why would we call them domestic terrorist group?
Speaker 2: Because they tried to use fear and force to change political environment.
Speaker 1: And what was the motivation for the use of fear and force?
Speaker 2: It was based on race and ethnicity.
Speaker 1: Right. Are you aware of the perception of, many about how the the the power and the discretion at ICE is being used to enforce the laws? And do you see any parallels?
Speaker 2: I do not see any parallels between I'm talking about perception. Officers and agents.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about perception.
Speaker 2: I I do not see a parallel between what is constitutionally mandated as in as it relates to enforcing the law
Speaker 1: Are you aware that there's a perception?
Speaker 2: See no Are
Speaker 1: Are you aware that there's a perception?
Speaker 2: Ice in the same category as the KKK. Is that what you're asking me?
Speaker 1: No. I'm very specific about what I'm asking. Are you aware of a perception that the way that the discretion
Speaker 2: I see no and
Speaker 1: I'm not finished.
Speaker 2: I see none.
Speaker 1: I'm not finished.
Speaker 0: This could be your next president if you don't go out and execute, vote, and bring 10 people with you.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is interesting what Candace has found in regard to KH. 🤨hmm https://t.co/HKkLlZRpCA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Blackwashing is when a politician, particularly during election season, tries to relate to black people by exaggerating or fabricating aspects of their connection to black culture. Kamala Harris and her campaign are accused of this, especially after scrutiny of Janet Jackson.
Harris's family allegedly descends from slavers and inherited $11,000,000 when slavery was abolished. The speaker found inconsistencies in the family history, including a Beryl who may have been domestic help and had a son named Donald who died young.
Donald Harris, presented as Kamala's father, would have been 6 when Beryl married Lawford Newland, who is absent from Donald's historical account. There's no divorce record between Lawford Newland and Beryl Finnegan. The speaker couldn't find a birth certificate for Donald J Harris or a marriage certificate between his parents, Oscar J Harris and Beryl Finnegan, raising suspicions about hidden information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, where should we begin? You guys have heard of whitewashing history, but have you heard of blackwashing? Blackwashing is when you're a politician and it's election season and suddenly you have to relate to black people. So you just sort of start making stuff up to blackify yourself, your history. You start dropping a bunch of slang and colloquialisms and hoping that the people will therefore understand you.
Honestly, it's become something of a democratic rite of passage. Except this time, I think we may have caught the culprit red handed. Of course, I'm speaking about Kamala Harris. I think her and her campaign team are really going to regret the day that their media henchmen came for Janet Jackson. It is just a fact that Kamala Harris's family descends from slavers.
They were given money for their slaves. Somebody did the calculation essentially, for that day and time, it would have been $11,000,000 that they inherited for their slaves once it was abolished. It is why when he speaks about his Jamaican heritage, he speaks about them as having owned stores. Right? So this is not your typical black story that we're referring to here.
And so I expected very much for there to be a record of marriage. Oddly, as you guys will recall, any records that I did find suggested to me that Beryl may have been the domestic help, who may have also given birth to a son named Donald, born in 1938 who died before he even turned 2. So that was very strange. Question marks. We were like, okay.
We're we're seeing this barrel. We're seeing this Donald Harris. We're seeing that an infant died. What's really going on here? Why is it starting to feel like a scary movie?
But, of course, we wanna rationalize it ourselves. Like, maybe it is just a coincidence that another barrel had another Donald in 1938 in Saint Aaron Aaron Parish and we shouldn't look too far into that. What we knew for certain was that Beryl, the correct Beryl, was married at the age of 25. So Donald Harris, who was presenting as Kamala's father, would have been 6 years old. She got married to a man named Lawford Newland, who he has completely erased from his childhood historical account.
When he wrote this piece, he did not mention a Lawford Newland, a step daddy named Lawford Newland. And that was odd because of Harris after that. So have the kid, marry someone else, and then go back and marry your baby daddy. I don't know. But I needed to find some records.
We also couldn't find a divorce record, by the way, between Lawford, Newland, and Beryl, Beryl Finnegan. Where's the divorce record? We did see that he went to America. We searched there. He went to New Orleans.
He went to California. We just could not find anything in my view. There were too many holes in his account numbers that he got wrong about the siblings. I just felt that there was a secret here. So I decided that we needed more information specifically about Donald J Harris himself.
And, we couldn't find a birth certificate for him, which I flagged as odd. And, I also wanted to find that marriage certificate between his father, Oscar Oscar j Harris, and his mother, Beryl Finnegan. That was crucial to me. So here's what we stumbled upon. More information about Donald J Harris appeared to us.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This should make you furious! Good on Hawley but what’s being done about it? https://t.co/KyNMK1GngG
Video Transcript AI Summary
A senator questions Director Wray about an FBI memo from the Richmond field office that labeled traditional Catholics as racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists. The senator accuses the FBI of targeting Catholics, listing churches in the memo, and approaching priests and choir directors to inform on parishioners.
Wray states the memo was withdrawn after he saw it and that the FBI does not investigate people for exercising their religious expression. He explains that the interviews were part of an investigation into an individual amassing Molotov cocktails.
The senator alleges Wray misled Congress, as he previously stated the FBI does not approach priests for information. He asks if anyone was fired for the memo, but Wray says no intentional misconduct was found, and some involved were Catholic. The senator accuses Wray of mobilizing the FBI against traditionalist Catholics and doing nothing about it.
The senator then questions Wray about using the FBI jet for personal travel to Atlanta and avoiding traffic, which Wray denies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many other parishes around the country have priests or choir directors been approached? By the way, are are Catholic choirs now are are they are they breeding grounds for domestic terrorism? Is this is this your latest theory? How many other parishes have FBI agents approached priests and choir directors to ask about parishioners?
Speaker 1: Look, senator, we do not and will not conduct investigations based on anybody's exercise of their constitution
Speaker 0: You have done so and your memo explicitly asks for it. Your memo labels traditional Catholics as racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists in need of investigation. You have a list of churches, a list in the memo. You've repeatedly said we don't target churches. We don't list churches.
They're listed in the memo. So how many other parishes have you gone to to talk to choir directors for heaven's sake?
Speaker 1: As I've
Speaker 0: saw the answer to that question.
Speaker 1: Senator Holy.
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister chairman. Director Wray, thank you for being here. I noticed with interest in your written testimony that you said, and I'm quoting you now, the FBI uses all tools available at its disposal to combat domestic terrorism, which now apparently includes the crime of being Catholic. Let's talk a little bit about the FBI's egregious targeting of Catholic Americans. You have repeatedly been asked about the memo generated by the Richmond field office.
We now know in collaboration with multiple other field offices about recruiting sources in Catholic churches, you have repeatedly said that no human sources were approached. This is you on July 12th in the house. You were asked directly by Jim Jordan, do you think that priests ought to be approached to give information on parishioners? You said, no, sir. No, sir.
You went on to say, we do not recruit, open, or operate human sources. We do not report on religious organizations. You went on to say, this product, meeting the Richmond memo, has not resulted in any investigative action. But now we know that in fact, FBI agents did approach a priest and a choir director to ask them to inform on parishioners. So were you lied to when you gave this testimony, or were you lying to congress?
Speaker 1: Neither. So the your your question conflates 2 different things. There's the intelligence product itself, which the Richmond field office created. It was written by as our inspection found by analysts in Richmond, reviewed by people in Richmond, and captioned Richmond field office product. Separately from that, there was an investigation of a specific individual who was amassing Molotov cocktails and posting about killing people.
And it does not surprise me that there were people who knew that subject in that investigation, that is the guy building the molotov cocktails and trying to kill people, that people talked to the witnesses who knew that person. And I think the product, the Richmond intelligence product, which cites that investigation, is actually pretty transparent about exactly what I just said.
Speaker 0: No. I don't think so at all. In fact, the whistle the only reason we know this is a whistleblower has come forward and told the house under oath that the FBI went and interviewed priests and choir directors in the Richmond area. The the house goes on to say that the FBI has repeatedly refused to disclose this information. The only reason we know it is because a whistleblower came forward with it.
Just like the only reason we know about this memo is because a whistleblower came forward with it. How many other parishes around the country have priests or choir directors been approached? By the way, are are Catholic choirs now are are they are they breeding grounds for domestic terrorism? Is this is this your latest theory? How many other parishes have FBI agents approached priests, inquire directors to ask about parishioners?
Speaker 1: Look, senator, we do not and will not conduct investigations based on anybody's exercise of their constitution
Speaker 0: You have done so and your memo explicitly asks for it. Your memo labels traditional Catholics as racially and ethnically motivated violent extremists in need of investigation. You have a list of churches, a list in the memo. You've repeatedly said we don't target churches. We don't list churches.
They're listed in the memo. So how many other parishes have you gone to to talk to choir directors for heaven's sake?
Speaker 1: As I've
Speaker 0: so the answer to that question.
Speaker 1: No, I don't know the answer to that question But I can tell you that we don't investigate people for their exercise of their constantly protected Constantly protected religious expression that particular intelligent product is something that as soon as I saw it, I was aghast. I had it withdrawn.
Speaker 0: Really? You were aghast? I was. Oh, really? And what have you done about it?
Did you fire the people who wrote it?
Speaker 1: No. I had it withdrawn.
Speaker 0: Have you fired anybody involved in it?
Speaker 1: Senator, if you will give me a chance to
Speaker 0: answer your question. Yes or no. It's not hard. Have you fired anyone involved in the writing of that outrageous memo about which frankly you've repeatedly misled the public? Yes or no?
Speaker 1: The individuals involved
Speaker 0: in that product fired anyone.
Speaker 1: Just a minute were not found to have engaged in any intentional or bad faith conduct. And in fact Tiddly. In fact, senator, a number of the individuals involved a number of the individuals involved in writing that product in the Richmond office were themselves Catholics. So the notion Oh, I see. That they were targeting their own faith.
Speaker 0: Oh, so they're not a free card. I see. I see. So you're immune and they're immune. So we shouldn't ask questions about it.
You haven't done a darn thing. You haven't fired anybody. In fact, what the house found is what is it? You you admonish them. They were admonished, and their respective supervisors were told to engage with the human resources division to ensure that deficiencies are addressed.
Oh, I feel much better. They've been sent to bed without food. Good heavens, director. This is one of the most outrageous targetings. You have mobilized your division, the most powerful law enforcement division in the world against traditionalist Catholics, whatever the heck that means, and you're just told us you you have not fired a single person.
I mean, here, it gets worse. Your Richmond field office, they thought there was nothing wrong with this. The house interviewed the head of the Richmond field office. He testified. It's all here in the public report.
I refer you to it. Pages 12, 13, 14. He testified. He saw no problem with this. He said he thought it was fine.
In fact, we have internal memoranda of the members of the field office high fiving one peer reviewer. Another member of the field office wrote, I think this is a great product. I really enjoyed the read. Do you have a problem with systemic bigotry against Catholics in the FBI? No.
What are you gonna do about this? Are you gonna fire these people or not?
Speaker 1: Those individuals have all been admonished, and it is all going into their if you would let me finish my answer, it is all going into their annual performance reviews, which has direct impact on their compensation among other things.
Speaker 0: Oh, I see. Oh, I see. I see. So the 60,000,000 American Catholics who we now who now learn that your FBI has recommended that priest be recruiters and informants. Your FBI has gone to priest choir directors, but we're to feel better because you've admonished them for their wrongdoing.
Speaker 1: You again are conflating 2 different things when we
Speaker 0: are your testimony where you said you do not. You said categorically categorically, you said we do not. We do not go to priests and ask them about the parishioners. You said we do not. You didn't say we haven't.
You didn't say we won't. You said we don't. As it turns out, you do. And you kept it from the public. You deliberately misled Congress about it and the only reason we know about it is because a whistleblower came forward.
Speaker 1: I just fundamentally disagree with your characterization.
Speaker 0: There's no characterization the facts of the facts. And I fundamentally resent the fact that you have violated, if not the spirit, if not the letter certainly the spirit of the first amendment, and use your law enforcement agency against Catholics in this nation. Let me ask you about one other thing. Last time you were here, you had to leave early to take a jet to your vacation in the Adirondacks. Now let me just ask you this, a whistleblower tells us that you also maintain a home in Atlanta to which you fly on a regular basis.
I'm told by this whistleblower from the FBI that you use the FBI jet to make that travel. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: All of my travel, personal or work related, is required to be done on FBI planes. That is long standing policy. It goes back well over a decade.
Speaker 0: I'll take that as a yes. The whistleblower also says that you regularly require the jet, which is based in Manassas, to be flown to DC because, and I quote now, Ray doesn't like to sit in traffic. Is that accurate?
Speaker 1: No. That's not accurate.
Speaker 0: He also says that you pay only the lowest cost.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This guy means business! Come on get with the program Teamsters! Where’s is the Trump endorsement? https://t.co/VKCEgtYQb7
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Teamsters member reports that a union poll showed 59.6% of members wanted Trump to be endorsed for president, while 34% favored Kamala Harris. Despite the poll results posted on the Teamsters website, news outlets are reporting that the Teamsters will not endorse Trump. The speaker questions why the Teamsters had members vote if they were not going to follow through with the results. The speaker implies the union is run by its members and risks losing them if it ignores their preference. The speaker references a past incident where the Teamsters allegedly lost members' pension money in the stock market and were bailed out by the government. The speaker demands the Teamsters either endorse Trump or "fix it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news, September 18, 2024. Teamsters. Oh, fucking Teamsters. And I'm not proud to be one right now. I can tell you that.
The Teamsters wanted us members to take a vote to see who we wanted the Teamsters to endorse as president, and we did. On their website, the polls are in. Trump won 59.6%, and Kamala Harris had 34%, and there was others. But then I see on CNN and other places that Teamsters is not going to endorse Trump. You wanted us to do a poll.
We took a poll. We're telling you that Trump should be endorsed by the Teamsters. If you don't endorse him, you do realize that the union is run by your members. If these members get pissed off enough and left, there is no Teamsters Union. In this video, I'll even leave the part out about you losing our pension on playing the stock market after the government and everybody else told you not to do it.
Then the teamsters were bailed out by the government, but instead you wanted a vote by members to see who we thought you should endorse, and we just told you. 59.6% for Trump. Kamala Harris, 34. Balls in your court, Teamsters. Are you gonna endorse Trump or not?
Members like me say you should. Teamsters, why'd you have us vote? Fuck off or fix it. Teamsters, why is the mainstream news outlet saying that you're not going to follow through with the vote that just took place with your members? Like I said, and I report on all this information is online, including the Teamsters website.
Fuck my life. This shit pisses me off. I'm out.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is unbelievable! Wow 😮! They will stop at nothing to give up the power! Listen folks we aren’t voting our way out of this mess!
@BehizyTweets - George
BREAKING: Citizens of Austria and Australia are reporting a scheme involving Democrat groups called “Vote from Abroad” & "Center for US Voters Abroad" running ads in their countries telling them to register & request a ballot to vote in the U.S. Presidential election One of my followers from Australia sent me a screenshot of an ad he saw on Facebook today. Similarly, True The Vote posted a screenshot of someone in Vienna, Austria, being asked to register to get a ballot. The form even allows people to select, "I don't have the above identification," in which case they'll still receive a ballot anyway. WHAT IS GOING ON???
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Has anyone heard this yet? I don’t doubt it one bit! She’s a walking dumpster 🔥! https://t.co/gmP9uDeL2g
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to leaks, Kamala Harris' CNN interview was edited down from 41 minutes to 18 because her campaign objected to over 50% of the footage. One question that was allegedly removed was Dana Bash asking how Harris can support both the Green New Deal and fracking. The claim is that Harris paused for 10-15 seconds before responding, "We'll get it done." The speaker suggests this response is nonsensical because the Green New Deal opposes fracking, and one cannot support two opposing things. The speaker believes the material CNN chose to keep in the interview was already bad, so the removed content must be worse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just got some new information that Kamala Harris' interview with CNN wasn't 18 minutes. It was 41. And the only reason you didn't see those other 22 minutes was because the Kamala Harris campaign objected to over 50% of the footage. And, of course, being CNN, they took all that stuff out. Thankfully, we have some leaks about the question CNN asked her that she had removed.
And the most hilarious one is when Dana Bash directly asked her, how can you fully support the green new deal and now support fracking? Apparently, Kamala Harris sat there silently for about a full 10 to 15 seconds. And then she responded with, we'll get it done. We'll get it done. Which part are you gonna get done, Kamala?
Because a big part of the green new deal is no more fracking. And if you're doing fracking, you're not doing the green new deal. You can't have 2 opposing things and say, we'll get it done. But, yeah, that's just a preview of the bullshit Kamala Harris had them take out of the interview. I have to say that the rest of it that was taken out must be pretty fucking bad because what they chose to keep in was awful.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Check this lying POŚ out! Wait for it! 💥💥💥 https://t.co/9r2ynghMqU
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker addresses Tim Walz, claiming Walz said that troops in Afghanistan told him they were worried about their families' healthcare. The speaker asserts that in their four years of combat experience as a leader, no soldier ever expressed concern about their family's healthcare. The speaker accuses Walz of using combat experience he doesn't have to push a political agenda and lying to advance his career. The speaker hopes Walz faces stolen valor charges, alleging that these lies helped him and benefited him monetarily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To my constituents in Southern Minnesota. I don't care if they're Republican, independent, Democrat. It doesn't matter to them. When I tell them, when I was in Afghanistan, you know what our troops were worried about? They were worried about their family's health care.
Speaker 1: Explain that shit, Tim Walz. Explain that one. Because you definitely didn't misspeak on that one. And you know how else to tell that you were full of shit? You stating that when your troops are over there, what they would tell you is they were worried about their family's healthcare.
Bro, I've got 4 years in fucking combat, and never once never once as a leader did I ever have a soldier tell me that they were concerned about their family's fucking healthcare, you piece of shit. Not one time. And so you'll sit there, and you'll try to use combat experience, which you don't have to push political agenda. You know how low of a human being you have to do that to lie to advance your career? And I I hope you get taken up on stolen valor charges because all of these fucking lies that you told most certainly helped you out.
You most certainly benefited monetarily from them. You lying piece of shit.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
I will follow up with an interview with Kash Patel and Shawn Ryan on the DS! https://t.co/BbUT32DuZL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Google informed the speaker of surveillance five years after the investigation began, but could not provide details. As a former national security prosecutor, the speaker believes all providers, telecoms, and banks were likely involved. Two individuals running the FBI and DOJ allegedly lied to the House Intelligence Committee and threatened them with investigation. One of those individuals, Rob Rosenstein, was exposed for signing a bogus Pfizer application. The speaker claims Chris Wray has repeatedly lied as FBI director. Gina Haspel, CIA director, was London station chief when Russia gate began, which the speaker describes as a barroom operation to record someone divulging information on Donald Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Google informed you that you're being surveilled 5 years after the investigation started. Right. What more did they tell you?
Speaker 1: They're not allowed to say anything, but that you can be informed now since it's 5 years later. So as a former national security prosecutor, I know you don't just go to Google. You go to every provider. You go to all the telecoms. You go to the bank.
You go to everybody. If you're gonna run an investigation, that's what you do. But these 2 guys who are running the FBI and DOJ sat in a room with the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and lied to our faces. They threatened to investigate us, which was bad enough. Right?
They actually did it. And then these 2 guys would get exposed for Rob Rosenstein specifically for signing a Pfizer that was totally bogus. And we've caught Chris Wray lying time and time again as a director of the FBI. Put these guys over here for a second. Gina Haspel, who was the director of the CIA, was London station chief, in England when Russia gate kicked off, where there was a barroom operation to try to record some nub into spilling the beans on Donald Trump.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kash Patel reveals shocking information about a $2 million issue, highlighting the gravity of the situation.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Well isn’t this grand, oh wait no it’s 2 million! Kash Patel exposes the true!
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Kash Patel: Deep State Rewarded Former FBI Officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page $2 Million for 'Improper Disclosure of Text Messages' in 'Rigging a Presidential Election and Breaking the Law' | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Kash Patel, former Department of Defense Chief of Staff and Deputy Director of National Intelligence under President Trump, has shed new light on the deep-seated corruption within the federal government, particularly targeting former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
thegatewaypundit.com
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Exactly they are a disgrace and they want socialísm so we can starve! Ya okay count me out!! https://t.co/3LsEs52SO9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris is proposing new economic policies that the speaker likens to Marxist economic philosophy. The speaker claims these proposals involve price controls, which they believe are economically unsound and lead to product shortages and "breadlines."
The speaker also asserts that Kamala Harris has avoided legitimate interviews for 27 days. They mention an interview Harris did with Tim Walz, where they allegedly discussed white people's preference for "white foods" like tuna and mayo. The speaker suggests this is not racist because Harris is not white.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Kamala Harris has some brand new economic proposals. Brand new, if you've never heard of Lenin or Stalin or Mao or any Marxist economic philosophy. So she wants price controls. Price controls are legitimately the stupidest economic idea pretty much ever. This is where you think prices are too high because you're dumb.
And so you just say that companies are not allowed to charge the actual proper price, and that you will come after them if they do. Which means the company stopped producing the product, which means that there's a shortage of the product, which means you end up with Bernie Sanders' favorite thing, breadline. Well done, Kamala. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris, she's still avoiding interviews. We're now on day 27 of her not doing any legit interviews.
But she did do an interview with Tim Walz, the person she elevated from Minnesota obscurity to the vice presidential nomination. And they talked about, you know, white people things, like how white people only like white foods, like tuna and mayo. It's not racist because she can't be a racist because because because you see, she she's not a white person. Oh, man. What a joyous campaign.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This is super interesting 🧐! Wow! https://t.co/5wJbtDjgZY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Walz increased taxes on nicotine pouches, claiming concerns about nicotine. However, there's no evidence that nicotine is a carcinogen; this is a misconception. A key point is that nicotine raises testosterone levels, a fact that has been suppressed online. If you search for "nicotine and testosterone," you'll find it difficult to uncover this truth. The decline in testosterone levels among men is significant, and this suppression seems intentional. The fear surrounding testosterone is evident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why they're against nicotine. That's why Walz raised the taxes on nicotine pouches. There's no evidence by the way that nicotine is a carcinogen. It's not. It's all a lie.
And what they hate about nicotine is it raises testosterone levels. They even suppressed that fact, that's a fact, on Google. Google nicotine and testosterone and see how many results it takes you to get to the core truth, which is, yes, nicotine use raises testosterone. Man, it is way, way down, and that's not an accident. They're afraid of testosterone.
100%. That's, like, completely right.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Love this ! 🙏🙏🙏 https://t.co/dPQ6jP9dbF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jesus, the greatest man in history, had no servants or degree, yet was called master and teacher. He healed without medicines, and kings feared him despite having no army. Though he didn't win battles, he conquered the world and was crucified for no crime. Buried in a tomb, he lives today, offering love and forgiveness. His message transformed many lives, offering strength to the powerless. Jesus, the treasure of our lives, invites us to a story of redemption and eternal life. If you believe in his message, comment amen and share with someone you love.
Translation: Jesus, the greatest man in history, was called master and teacher despite having no servants or degree. He healed without medicines and kings feared him without an army. Though he didn't win battles, he conquered the world and was crucified for no crime. Buried in a tomb, he lives today, offering love and forgiveness. His message transformed many lives, offering strength to the powerless. Jesus, the treasure of our lives, invites us to a story of redemption and eternal life. If you believe in his message, comment amen and share with someone you love.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Greatest man in history, Jesus. Had no servants, yet they called him master. Had no degree, yet they called him teacher. Had no medicines, yet they called him healer. He had no army, yet kings feared him.
He won no military battles, yet he conquered the world. He did not live in a castle, yet they called him lord. He ruled no nations, yet they called him king. He committed no crime, yet they crucified him. He was buried in a tomb, yet he lives today.
His kingdom is not of this world, yet it lies within the hearts of those who believe. He spoke of love and forgiveness, and his words have transformed 1,000,000. He offers no material wealth, yet we consider him the treasure of our lives. He promises no earthly power, yet in his name the powerless have found strength. Though he left no written words, his message has filled countless pages.
In his weakness, we find our strength. In his suffering, our salvation. He continues to invite us into a story of redemption, love, and eternal life. His name is Jesus Christ. If you believe in his message, comment amen, and share this video with someone you love.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Omg this is hilarious 😂! Maybe put that drink down for a minute! Lol 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/Od6cm2hb5C
Video Transcript AI Summary
Camel Toe, a successor to Joe, surprised fans by farting at an event. Despite the stinky situation, supporters remained loyal. Justin Bieber covered his face to avoid the smell. The incident highlights the continuation of Democratic policies under new leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my. When Camel Toe said she was planning to continue Joe's legacy, I had no idea that she meant crop dusting innocent members of the crowd. This cackling idiot may not draw large crowds like her choosy proof nemesis, but her fans are fiercely loyal. Notice how these devoted cameltoe lovers continue to cheer even as cackling camela drops a sphincter bomb that had to have registered 7.4 on the rectum scale. As cameltoe glances around nervously, seeking to attribute this odor bubble to an unsuspecting member of the crowd.
Gender neutral Justin Bieber is visibly overwhelmed by the aftermath of Kamala's bean burrito breakfast. Instinctively, he covers his face with his t shirt in a desperate attempt to avoid an unfortunate case of pink eye. This situation, while thoroughly disgusting, imparts a valuable lesson. Despite president Potato Head being succeeded by his cackling hyena counterpart, we can anticipate the same old from the Democratic party even if now presented by a more diverse leadership.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
They líè about everything and it’s rigged against us! 🤬 https://t.co/Q7VhsbXiHn
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been fed lies and many things once labeled as conspiracy turned out to be true. I question everything now, feeling manipulated beyond comprehension. It's hard to believe anything unless it's tangible. Deceit is rampant, making it impossible for humans to grasp the extent of falsehoods.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lies that we've been fed Mhmm. And so many things that were labeled conspiracy that turned out not to be conspiracy. I mean, it's now to the point where I already question Mhmm. Everything. I think we've all been manipulated a lot more than any of us can even fathom.
We are already at the point where you cannot believe anything that you see unless it's right in front of you, and you can touch it. There's so much deceit in this world that I I don't think that any human could process how much of it is false.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
Love this Sheriff we need more of them!💥💥💥💥 https://t.co/NPmqIk9ksU
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man with a criminal history was reported as a suspicious person in a neighborhood. Deputies arrived, and he began breaking into homes. One homeowner shot at him, which is allowed in Santa Rosa County. The homeowner is encouraged to attend a gun safety class to improve their shooting skills and potentially prevent future incidents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Prison for 6 and a half years for home invasion, and he just can't seem to get the picture of crime does not pay. So yesterday about 4:30, we get a call to Santa Villa subdivision in reference to him being a suspicious person. Multiple people call. We end up probably 20 deputies get there, set up a perimeter. The dogs are out, and he's jumping fences and breaking into houses as he goes.
So that started at 4 30. Around 5:12 PM, we get a call, shots fired. 1 of the homeowners, he was breaking into their house, and they shot at him. As to the person, we don't know what homeowner which homeowner shot at him. I guess they think that they did something wrong, which they did not.
If somebody's breaking in your house, you're more than welcome to shoot them in Santa Rosa County. We prefer that you do, actually. So whoever that was, you're not in trouble. Come see us. We have a gun safety class we put on every other Saturday.
And if you take that, you'll shoot a lot better, and hopefully, you'll save taxpayers' money.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
This man speaks for the majority of people out there! More Dads need to get louder and stop this madness! Do you agree? https://t.co/o5LONmds7H
Video Transcript AI Summary
My daughters will only compete against other women in sports. We need to stop allowing biological men to change in front of young girls. Let's fix this by 2024.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: God bless this man. Listen to this. Rowan, I can assure you that my 4 year old and my 2 year old daughters will not change in front of biological men. This is ridiculous. I don't care what party you are a part of.
If you think that we are all equal and the same biologically, you've literally lost your mind. And when my 2 daughters work hard in the sport, work hard in their craft to be the best that they can be amongst other women, they will compete against other women. I owe Victoria and Olivia and every other young lady in this country that. If you think I'm wrong, I am not the problem. I can assure you.
We have an opportunity in this country to get this right in 2024 so we could stop all of this foolishness.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
I think he’s exactly rïğht! https://t.co/TjxQ0Zfk7o
Video Transcript AI Summary
In November, the US will see a turning point: either Trump leads significant changes or Americans realize the election system is corrupt. It's crucial to be prepared, especially for gun owners, as there may be people knocking on doors. Being healthy is key to fulfilling the responsibilities of being a man - a leader, protector, and provider for family and community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you right now, come November, there's gonna be a very significant turning point in the direction of the United States because one of two things is going to happen. There's going to be a global revolution where Donald Trump takes office and significant changes happen in the federal government across the board or there are going to be millions of Americans who come to the stark realization that the American election system is corrupt and broken. That's what's going to happen in November. Now you guys know me. I don't spend very much time talking about politics on these calls.
But if you're not paying attention, and more importantly, if you're not prepared, you're a fucking idiot. Get your head out of the sand and get your house in order because it's going to happen. And I promise you, if you are an American gun owner, there will be people knocking on your door. That's the direction we're going. This is why we're doing what we're doing as far as our health is concerned, because being healthy is a prerequisite to being a man, and you as men all carry a responsibility and an obligation to be leaders, protectors, and providers for your families and your communities.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
If you don’t like it here leave! https://t.co/6sm94m5pVw
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you don't like America, leave. We don't want you here. If you don't want to be here, go home. People chanting in Arabic about the country they chose, but it's not good enough for them. We don't need you here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't like America? Get out. Get out. We don't want you here either. You don't wanna be here?
We don't want you. It's perfect. Go home. Honestly, like, these happiest people are chanting in Arabic about this country that they've clearly chosen, but it's not good enough for them. Get out.
We don't need you here.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
How pathetic is he? 🙄🤦♀️
reSee.it AI Summary
President Joe Biden noticed a girl in the crowd, complimented her ears, and asked her name. He mistakenly guessed her age as 17 when she was actually 6. Some Twitter users expressed concern, calling him a predator. Others made sarcastic remarks.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: President Joe Biden notices a small girl in the crowd and runs over to tell her that he likes her ears. Biden: “I love your ears. I love them. They're really cool. What's your name?” Girl: “Catherine.” Biden: “What a beautiful name. That's my mommy's name. Well, nice to see. How old are you? 17?” Child: “6” Biden: “6??!” Creep. Video: @RNCResearch
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude and compliments the listener's ears. They ask for the listener's name, which is Catherine, and mention that it is also their mother's name. The speaker then greets Catherine and asks her age, to which she responds that she is 6 years old.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, and I love your ears. I love them. They're really cool. What's your name? Catherine.
Catherine, What a beautiful name. That's my mommy's name. Well, nice to see. How old are you? 17?
6.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
@CollinRugg @RNCResearch Omg this man is a predator!
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
@KathleenWinche3 @RNCResearch I’m surprised he didn’t try to sniff her.