TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @WyattCatarina
reSee.it AI Summary
The Kindlifresserbrunnen, or Child Eater Fountain, is located in Switzerland alongside the World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, CERN Particle Collider, GAVI Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunization, World Trade Organization, and United Nations in Geneva. The fountain depicts a half-goat demon, which refers to itself as "they/them," similar to biblical references. Some see parallels to the transgender agenda push.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is The Kindlifresserbrunnen, in English, the Child Eater Fountain. Located in Switzerland. You know what else is located in Switzerland: World Economic Forum World Health Organization CERN Particle Collider GAVI Global Alliance for Vaccines & Immunization World Trade Organization & let’s not forget the United Nations, all located in Geneva, Switzerland… The Kindlifresserbrunnen is a half-goat demon. Let not forget: Demons refer to themselves as “They” & “Them” Examples of this Mark 5:1-5:13 Mark 16:9 Luke 11:24-26 Luke 8:2 Matthew 8:31 Strong parallels to the #Trans #Transgender agenda push
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation highlights the work of Mark Malone, who achieved significant medical breakthroughs, including restoring human genes and eradicating cancer stem cells. A simplified explanation of his approach includes three main strategies: using Ivermectin to stop cancer signals, employing gene-unlockers to activate healthy genes, and rewiring energy with natural supplements like α-Ketoglutarate. These methods led to a 70% tumor reduction and extended survival from 4 to 12 months without side effects. Malone is now exploring further applications for other diseases.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Seriously, protect this man at all costs! @joerogan Pls have him on ur show; he is Mark Malone- 1st Human Genes Restored + 1st Cancer Stem Cell Eradication. For my wife & son https://t.co/6MxLmtu8bV
@tasteslikesalt - NÆ 🆑𝕏
i had grok summarized what he did as simple as possible: Here's the easy version of what he used, broken into 3 main parts (over about 4 months, with checkups): Stop Cancer Signals (Like Turning Off a Loud Alarm) Main Thing: Ivermectin (a common parasite pill, like for worms in animals—but safe for humans too). How: 36mg for first 3 days, then 70mg daily by mouth. Why It Helped: It quieted the cancer's growth signals, shrinking the tumor by 70% and slowing cell chaos. Unlock Hidden Genes (Like Opening Locked Doors) Main Thing: Special gene-unlockers (like valproic acid, an FDA-approved med for seizures). How: Taken daily by mouth (exact dose not public, but low and safe). Why It Helped: It woke up "sleeping" healthy genes in her body, turning cancer cells more normal (e.g., added estrogen receptors from 0% to 25%). Rewire Energy (Like Switching from Junk Food to Healthy Fuel) Main Things: α-Ketoglutarate (AKG)—a natural supplement for energy boost (about 1-2g daily). Other helpers like glutamine blockers (nutraceuticals, like plant-based pills). Short fasts (skipping meals now and then). How: All oral or just eating less at times. Why It Helped: Made cancer cells weak and body cells strong, cutting tumor spread by 27%. Bonus for Tough Spots: Later, he added niclosamide (an old worm med, 500-2,000mg daily) to kill leftover "super cancer" cells.Results: Her tumor shrank, a spread-out lump vanished, and she lived 3x longer than expected (12 months vs. 4)—all without side effects. It's like rebooting a glitchy computer with safe tools. Now, he's testing it more for other diseases. For the full story, check his ResearchGate paper.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Seriously, protect this man at all costs! @joerogan Pls have him on ur show; he is Mark Malone- 1st Human Genes Restored + 1st Cancer Stem Cell Eradication. For my wife & son https://t.co/6MxLmtu8bV
Video Transcript AI Summary
- I'm the first person to restore gene function in the history of the world across chromosomes.
- I developed it right here in this basement on this whiteboard to save my dying wife of cancer.
- This is the first system to ever restore gene function across chromosomes, and it did it without any editing.
- CRISPR can't do this.
- I built a system, a three part system that I call the Triune restoration system.
- PI three k is a negative regulator of molecular cells.
- By inhibiting p I three k and leaving mTOR untouched, which I will get to here, we allowed genomic repair for the first time.
- SYN three and HDAC are complexes that lock down gene expression; CRISPR cannot uncompress these.
- Estrogen and progesterone genes were restored from completely silenced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My friends, my name is Mark Malone. I'm the first person to restore gene function in the history of the world across chromosomes. I developed it right here in this basement on this whiteboard to save my dying wife of cancer. This has implications for one and a half billion to two billion people's diseases, autism, neurodegeneration, cancer, infertility, and autoimmune diseases. This is the first system to ever restore gene function across chromosomes, and it did it without any editing.
CRISPR can't do this. This was not just editing genes like CRISPR. This restored natural gene expression. This is not something that required toxicity, invasive procedures. In fact, I did it with FDA approved safe compounds by building a system, a three part system that I call the Triune restoration system, by triggering three parts that restored the native intelligence of our bodies to reexpress these genes.
It is proven by comparative biopsies from notable independent labs that are used by oncologists every single day. I am known in Google as the first person to restore gene function naturally, by not editing, and the only to restore across chromosomes in the history of the world. This is the single big biggest biomedical advancement in history. Let me walk you through how I did it. Step one, p I three k m toward decoupling.
P I three k is a negative regulator of molecular cells. K? So it's driving a molecular pathway inside the cell, and it's a negative regulator. It drives disease. Anything from Alzheimer's to cancer to autism, you name it.
MTOR is an engine within inside the cell that will either proliferate disease or repair genetic disease. MTOR is essential for repairing the genome, but by driven by p I three k, it will always further disease. I did the first decoupling. By inhibiting p I three k and leaving mTOR untouched, which I will get to here, we allowed genomic repair for the first time. The second part was SYN three and HDAC.
These are complexes, chromatin and histone complexes that lock down gene expression. And this is the important thing. CRISPR cannot uncompress these. It's an editing system. But a billion or more people's diseases is gene science and compression, and it cannot touch it.
By inhibiting this, cracking it open, we allowed this repair system to access the material, the genetic and DNA material to repair that gene. The final part was glycolysis and glutaminolysis, the metabolic state of the cell, the dysregulated diseased nature of the cell. By removing this, we opened up the healthier nature of the cellular milieu through alpha ketoglutarate, which kept mTOR in repair mode and also inhibited this complex that was repressing it. These three, this triune restoration system through alpha ketoglutarate and streptomyces backed inhibition of these compounds restored gene function for the first time in history without editing and the first time irrespective of method across chromosomes. Estrogen and progesterone genes were restored from completely silenced, which has implications for billions of people's diseases, not just because of how important those genes are, but for how the fact that we have genes across the genome repressed with these same three mechanisms across autism, across cancer, across neurodegeneration, across mental health, across autoimmunity.
And by getting RNA and DNA material, histone material to resurface through the engine that wasn't suppressed because we removed its negative regulator, we reversed a terminal refractory TNBC case and gave three times the lifespan that has never been recorded in the history of world to a patient like my wife. My wife should have been gone within two to three months. She lived three to four times that that length by what I did right here in my basement. But the implications this has for diseases that are not cancer, that are not terminal, that are neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, or infertility, autoimmune, expand even what it could do in cancer, where the genetic complex repression is the form of disease itself as opposed to one that is proliferating across the body like cancer. This is the single biggest biomedical advancement in history.
It was made by a desperate husband trying to save his wife and now a desperate father trying to save his son, which is why I'm so passionate about scaling this. I hope you'll join me in scaling this and helping us deploy this because it is human tested. It is safe. It is ready, and we've gotta save my son and save the world.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Seriously, protect this man at all costs! @joerogan Pls have him on ur show; he is Mark Malone- 1st Human Genes Restored + 1st Cancer Stem Cell Eradication. For my wife & son https://t.co/6MxLmtu8bV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Malone claims to be the first person to restore gene function across chromosomes, done in his basement to save his dying wife of cancer, with implications for autism, neurodegeneration, cancer, infertility, and autoimmune diseases. He describes the Triune restoration system—PI three k toward decoupling, SYN three and HDAC, and glycolysis and glutaminolysis via alpha ketoglutarate and streptomyces backed inhibition—restoring native gene expression without editing, something CRISPR cannot do. He says this was "proven by comparative biopsies from notable independent labs used by oncologists every single day" and achieved with "FDA approved safe compounds." He notes estrogen and progesterone genes were restored from completely silenced and that this has implications across diseases. He claims he "reversed a terminal refractory TNBC case" and gave "three times the lifespan" to his wife. He seeks to scale it to "save my son and save the world."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My friends, my name is Mark Malone. I'm the first person to restore gene function in the history of the world across chromosomes. I developed it right here in this basement on this whiteboard to save my dying wife of cancer. This has implications for one and a half billion to two billion people's diseases, autism, neurodegeneration, cancer, infertility, and autoimmune diseases. This is the first system to ever restore gene function across chromosomes, and it did it without any editing.
CRISPR can't do this. This was not just editing genes like CRISPR. This restored natural gene expression. This is not something that required toxicity, invasive procedures. In fact, I did it with FDA approved safe compounds by building a system, a three part system that I call the Triune restoration system, by triggering three parts that restored the native intelligence of our bodies to reexpress these genes.
It is proven by comparative biopsies from notable independent labs that are used by oncologists every single day. I am known in Google as the first person to restore gene function naturally, by not editing, and the only to restore across chromosomes in the history of the world. This is the single big biggest biomedical advancement in history. Let me walk you through how I did it. Step one, p I three k m toward decoupling.
P I three k is a negative regulator of molecular cells. K? So it's driving a molecular pathway inside the cell, and it's a negative regulator. It drives disease. Anything from Alzheimer's to cancer to autism, you name it.
MTOR is an engine within inside the cell that will either proliferate disease or repair genetic disease. MTOR is essential for repairing the genome, but by driven by p I three k, it will always further disease. I did the first decoupling. By inhibiting p I three k and leaving mTOR untouched, which I will get to here, we allowed genomic repair for the first time. The second part was SYN three and HDAC.
These are complexes, chromatin and histone complexes that lock down gene expression. And this is the important thing. CRISPR cannot uncompress these. It's an editing system. But a billion or more people's diseases is gene science and compression, and it cannot touch it.
By inhibiting this, cracking it open, we allowed this repair system to access the material, the genetic and DNA material to repair that gene. The final part was glycolysis and glutaminolysis, the metabolic state of the cell, the dysregulated diseased nature of the cell. By removing this, we opened up the healthier nature of the cellular milieu through alpha ketoglutarate, which kept mTOR in repair mode and also inhibited this complex that was repressing it. These three, this triune restoration system through alpha ketoglutarate and streptomyces backed inhibition of these compounds restored gene function for the first time in history without editing and the first time irrespective of method across chromosomes. Estrogen and progesterone genes were restored from completely silenced, which has implications for billions of people's diseases, not just because of how important those genes are, but for how the fact that we have genes across the genome repressed with these same three mechanisms across autism, across cancer, across neurodegeneration, across mental health, across autoimmunity.
And by getting RNA and DNA material, histone material to resurface through the engine that wasn't suppressed because we removed its negative regulator, we reversed a terminal refractory TNBC case and gave three times the lifespan that has never been recorded in the history of world to a patient like my wife. My wife should have been gone within two to three months. She lived three to four times that that length by what I did right here in my basement. But the implications this has for diseases that are not cancer, that are not terminal, that are neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental, or infertility, autoimmune, expand even what it could do in cancer, where the genetic complex repression is the form of disease itself as opposed to one that is proliferating across the body like cancer. This is the single biggest biomedical advancement in history.
It was made by a desperate husband trying to save his wife and now a desperate father trying to save his son, which is why I'm so passionate about scaling this. I hope you'll join me in scaling this and helping us deploy this because it is human tested. It is safe. It is ready, and we've gotta save my son and save the world.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Now this is GoLD! Someone made a boo-boo 😅 https://t.co/NVEHWdnVdr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks Mr. Malnik how many deportations by the new administration would be objectionable. Malnik says a million would be a disaster, and two million would have severe negative ramifications, considering they would be law-abiding people who have been in the country for decades.
The speaker states that President Obama deported nearly 5,000,000 people and asks if Malnik believes Obama was immoral and inappropriate for doing so. The speaker wants Malnik to state on social media that Obama did a horrible disservice to those he deported and was as wrong-minded as Republicans who want to secure the border and deport people. The speaker argues that one cannot be okay with one president deporting people but not another.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How many illegal immigrants being deported by the new administration would you find objectionable? Mister Malnik, I'll ask you. A million?
Speaker 1: I think a million would be a disaster. 2,000,000? Again, considering we're talking about law abiding people who've been here for decades, I think that is enough that would have severe negative ramifications for The United States.
Speaker 0: I'm not reading what Trump intends to do. I'm I'm reading exactly what president Barack Obama did when he came into office and deported nearly 5,000,000 people. So you said president Obama was immoral and inappropriate to deport those million people. Is that what I heard you say? There were many people who were in US.
I would really appreciate it to say if you would go out on social media and say that the president Obama did a horrible disservice to those people he deported, and he's as wrong minded as every other Republican who said we've got to secure the border, deport people. Because you can't have one being okay and the other one not being okay.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
THIS is what I want major light to be shed upon....that cocaine has nothin on this! https://t.co/xjyppvpUeX
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines seven points regarding the treatment of January 6 defendants. First, the House Select Committee was lawlessly formed and acted in a one-sided way. Second, the committee worked with regime media to blast the narrative that an insurrection occurred. Nancy Pelosi's documentary allegedly admits no real insurrection occurred. Third, many defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet violating the fourth amendment via geofencing and cell phone data warrants.
Fourth, the Justice Department didn't respect the protesters' first amendment rights, unlike how they treated Antifa. Fifth, January 6 defendants haven't been dealt with in the same fashion as Antifa and BLM protesters, violating equal protection. Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations, including concealed footage and unreleased deposition transcripts. Seventh, DC judges are under the spell of the January 6 committee and are misapplying a statute, leading to disproportionate sentences compared to Antifa and BLM, who largely got off scot-free.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We make seven quick points. First, one of the original sins of government that has carried, and caused the poor treatment of the January 6 protester defendants is, the, lawless formation of the house select committee, the January 6 committee, leading to it acting in a one-sided and due process free way. That committee was gerrymandered by speaker Pelosi, operated without a ranking member or counsel to the ranking member. Liz Cheney was granted vice chair status to try to cover that up. The committee then had a series of carefully scripted by Hollywood hearings where the entire q and a path was prewritten and meshed with cherry picked snippets of highly edited audio I'm sorry, video and audio doctored video.
The committee interviewed a thousand plus witnesses, it says, but only about 200 transcripts have been released. Second, the January 6 committee worked with regime media. The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and MSNBC, etcetera. In that way, the fake narrative that an insurrection had been had occurred on January 6 was blasted everywhere. Based on secretly recorded video, we now have on tape Nancy Pelosi's documentary and daughter and her friends admitting that no real insurrection ever occurred.
The collective effect of the January 6 committee shameful way of proceeding, plus the reinforcing media blitz poisoned the jury pool Washington DC. Trial venue transfers out of DC should have been permitted. Media narrative mongering indeed was also the pre original sin therefore of this entire issue because it laid the groundwork for the January 6 select committee's hatchet jobs. Third, many of the defendants were swept up in a vast dragnet that I believe violated the fourth amendment because it was the equivalent of a general warrant that our framers sought to ban. This was done through the use of geofencing technology and cell phone data warrants sent to telecom providers.
Additionally, many protesters arriving after president Trump's speech in the ellipse in the ellipse had finished did not see any signage that areas normally open to the public were closed that day, setting up a trespass trap for the unwary. Fourth, the justice department did not treat these cases with appropriate respect for the first amendment rights of the protesters. The twenty twenty presidential election was incredibly contentious and many citizens in this country disagreed with mainstream media pronouncements that they should, in essence, sit down and shut up about the election and how it was conducted. By contrast, I was at the justice department getting daily updates about the Marco Hatfield Federal Courthouse in Portland being attacked night after night after night in the summer of twenty twenty. Insurrection is a far more appropriate moniker for that targeted antifa lawlessness than a largely spontaneously assembled crowd being agitated by tear gas and rubber bullets.
Yet, the first amendment issues led to the self agitators in Portland being treated very differently and with special kid gloves. This takes me to my fifth point. The January 6 defendants, have not, been dealt with in the same fashion as the Antifa and BLM protesters in 2020 who engaged in terrible conduct, threatened the White House, did millions of damage in property to property in that summer in the lead up to the presidential election. This is a flat violation in terms of comparing those two categories of defendants or potential defendants of the equal protection of the laws. Many Americans think the selective prosecution on display here is blatant.
Sixth, there are widespread Brady violations as to how these defendants are being dealt with today and I'll confine that to just two areas for our purposes today. First, the concealed or underreported footage issue around the capital. So the house is to be commended for allowing Tucker Carlson, Julie Kelly, and John Solomon to review the footage. And second, it's hard to imagine that with 800 plus or so unreleased January 6 committee deposition transcripts that there's not at least some exculpatory evidence in there that is not yet been seen by the relevant defendants and their lawyers. The January 6 committee in short acted like a star chamber and there is no reason for this congress to let that go on.
Seventh and lastly, the judges on the federal court here in Washington DC seem to have come under the spell of the January 6 committee's original sin and in that way they allowed the constructed mainstream media narrative to influence their decisions. And as a legal matter, they're by and large allowing a statute designed to close an obstruction of of justice loophole that Arthur Anderson exploited in the Enron debacle to be applied to entirely different activity that in many instances is protected by the first amendment and should appropriately be treated differently. As a result, Antifa and BLM revolutionaries and it's not an exaggeration to call them that who engaged in worse conduct largely got off scot free and worse yet many of them left with bags of cash from civil settlements. By contrast, the sentence is being handed down against January 6 defendants are wildly disproportionate. For all these reasons, I'm glad to be here today before you.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
ohhhhhh I love this song more than ever now 😅❤️ https://t.co/61GUUBfTqR
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Hola @joerogan how about getting this guy on ur show?! Trump has always warned us about Obama; Trump's been right about EVERYTHING! https://t.co/BmWxh3ER1H
Video Transcript AI Summary
Crimes, including the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, are being exposed. The governor of Michigan used to work for George Soros, who allegedly hates the U.S. California governor Gavin Newsom is Nancy Pelosi's nephew, and Adam Schiff's sister is married to one of Soros' sons. John Kerry's daughter is married to a mullah's son in Iran.
Several mainstream media figures have connections to Obama and the Democratic Party. ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, and CBS president David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes. ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to Jay Carney, and ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan. ABC president Ben Sherwood is the brother of Elizabeth Sherwood.
James Comey's brother, Peter Comey, was in charge of the Clinton Foundation audit. Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global, where Kamala Harris' husband, Douglas Emhoff, works. Richard Blum, Dianne Feinstein's husband, is on the board for Blum Capital Partners, which owns Dominion. Nancy Pelosi's husband is also a major investor in Dominion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now their crimes, including the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, are being exposed in real time for the world to see.
Speaker 1: The governor of Michigan used to work for George Soros. Who's the governor of Michigan? Think about it. California governor Gavin Newsom is Nancy Pelosi's nephew. Just just bear me out.
Keep coming with me. Adam Schiff's sister is married to one of George Soros' sons. Who George Soros? He hates The United States. He wants to turn The United States on its head.
He put all of these progressives in in office. He votes strictly Democrat. He he supports strictly the Democratic Party, and he hates The United States. He said it. He hates us.
John Kerry, we know who he is. Forget that guy. His daughter is married to a mullah's son in Iran. His daughter is married to a mullah's son in Iran. Understand the connection that I'm making here.
These are all facts. I'm not making this up. ABC News executive producer, Ian Cameron, is married to Susan Rice, Obama's former national security adviser. You wanna see the deep state? You wanna see the mafia?
You wanna see how this all pulls together? You wanna understand why certain things have happened in this country over the past several years? Keep listening. CBS president David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama's deputy national security adviser for strategic communications. So ABC News and CBS News both had people at the high level that were connected to Obama and the Democratic Party.
ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to Jay Carney, who is the former Obama White House press secretary. Look at the connection. Look at the mainstream media. Look at the deep state that we're talking about. This is mafia.
This is all about control. Gotta give them credit. They've done it right. ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, who is Obama's former former deputy press secretary. Look at the connection here.
Look at how it's all coming together. ABC president Ben Sherwood is the brother of Elizabeth Sherwood, Obama's former special adviser. Who do you think's calling the shots here? You know darn well Biden wasn't calling the shots. Mafia?
You bet. All about power and control. They've been installing these people. They've been controlling the media. This is what it's all about.
Let's keep going. This is what you call a stacked deck. If you had a hunch the news media was somehow rigged and you couldn't put your finger on it, this might help you solve the puzzle. Now you know why no one has investigated. They all have their hands in the cookie jar.
You might remember James Comey, remember, head of the FBI, who investigated the Clinton email scandal and the Clinton Foundation and made the final decision to not recommend prosecution by the DOJ. Well, listen to this. It turns out that Clinton Foundation was audited by the law firm DLA Piper. One of the executives there was in charge of the Clinton Foundation audit. Who was it?
Peter Comey, James Comey's brother. Why wasn't she investigated to the why wasn't she indicted? She should have been indicted. She obstructed justice. We know that.
We know that there was bribes coming into the Clinton Foundation, but James Comey's brother was in charge of the investigation. This is mafia people. Take my word for it. Look at the connection now with these voting machines where we had controversy. Remember?
Trump complaining, people complaining in Arizona that the Dominion, there was something wrong there. Who controls this? Listen closely. Smartmatic partnered with DLA Piper Global. Douglas C.
Emoff, who is that? The husband of Kamala Harris. Works at DLA Piper Global. So now you got a connection to Kamala Harris with the voting machines. Douglas Centimeters off, of course, Kamala Harris's husband.
Guess who owns Dominion? Blum Capital Partners. Guess who is on the board for the company? Richard Blum. Guess who Richard Blum is?
Dianne Feinstein's husband. Do you see how this all ties together to the Democrats, all the progressives? You have people in government in the Democratic Party that were controlling the outcome of Hillary Clinton and other things. And now you have the voting machines, Dominion, that surfaces 40% of the country is all tied up with the Democrats. And we have we have controversy about all of these things.
Richard Blom is Dianne Feinstein's husband. Nancy Pelosi's husband is also a major investor in the company. Nancy Pelosi, She despises Donald Trump, despises him. Her husband is on the board controlling dominion.
Speaker 0: It's a big club, and thank God you're not in it.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Whoa, IDK who this lady is, but she's 🔥 The President's OATH is to Protect the Constitution, not to obey the Supreme Court ⭐️🇺🇸 https://t.co/WgEXqtopxU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Publius Holder, a retired litigation attorney, argues that the Supreme Court ignores the original intent of the Constitution as expressed in the Federalist Papers. He claims the Attorney General failed to cite constitutional authority for federal restrictions on arms. Holder asserts the Constitution does not delegate power to Congress to restrict arms because the framers intended an armed populace to defend against potential federal tyranny, referencing Federalist Paper 46.
He states that Congress authorized private warships, or privateers, to make war on enemies, further demonstrating the framers’ vision of an armed populace. Holder believes the Supreme Court has become the ultimate authority, supplanting the Constitution, and that generations of lawyers have been indoctrinated with this view. He contends that the President and Congress have checks on the Supreme Court, including impeachment. Referencing Madison's Virginia Resolutions, Holder concludes that states, as sovereign parties, have the authority to nullify unconstitutional federal acts and check all three branches of the federal government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got five minutes. If you would, please make sure your green light is on, and then state your name and title for the record.
Speaker 1: Thank you. It is on. My name is Publius Holder. I'm a retired litigation attorney, and I write on the original intent of the constitution using the Federalist Papers. I do not go by supreme court opinions because for two hundred years, the supreme court has been ignoring the Federalist Papers and the constitution our framers given, and they have gone off on tangents of their own which have nothing to do with the constitution.
The attorney general's opinion begs the question. He states that states can't nullify acts of the federal government which are authorized by the constitution, but then he completely fails to cite article section and verse, a clause, where the constitution delegates to congress authority to restrict our arms. When we ratified the constitution, we created the federal government. We listed, enumerated every power we granted to our creature, the federal government. Article one, section eight, clauses one through 16 lists most of the powers we delegated to congress for the government for for the country at large.
We didn't put on our list that our creature could restrict our arms. We didn't delegate this power to congress because our framers wanted the American people to be heavily armed. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison write about this in the Federalist Papers. In Federalist Paper number 46, James Madison writes why the American people are armed. It is so we can defend ourselves, our communities, and our states from the federal government in the event it becomes tyrannical and oversteps the constitutional limits on its powers.
In article one section eight clause 16, pursuant to that, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1792 where they required every able-bodied male citizen between the ages of 18 and 46 except for federal officers and employees to buy a rifle, ammunition, and report to their local militia for training. Pursuant to Article I, Section eight, Clause 11, congress is authorized to issue letters of mark and reprisal. This is what authorizes private warships to make war on our enemies. These were the privateers who fired on British ships during the war of eighteen twelve. Our framers contemplated a people who were heavily armed.
That is why we never delegated to our creature authority to restrict our arms in any fashion whatsoever. And when the federal government attempts to do so, they are usurping powers which they do not possess. The attorney general goes by court opinions, not the constitution. There is a vast gulf between the two. We have 200 of supreme court opinions, and mister chairman very kindly shared some of these two hundred years of supreme court opinions, which have nothing to do with the constitution.
Charles Evans Hughes said over a hundred years ago, the constitution means what the judges say it means. That has been the prevailing dogma ever since, and generations of lawyers have been indoctrinated with this lie. That is why we no longer have a federal government which is held down by the chains of the constitution. What we have is rule by five. Five judges on the supreme court who claim the power to do whatever they want to us and our country.
So today, we have two offices, what the constitution says and what the supreme court says. Well, your oath of office requires you to obey the constitution, not the supreme court. The supreme court is merely a creature of this constitution and is completely subject to its terms. My third point, the AG asserts that the attorney general I'm sorry, that the supreme court is the exclusive and final authority on the extent of the powers of the federal government. But our framers knew that supreme court judges were as likely as anybody else to be corrupt, usurp powers, and act lawlessly.
So congress, the president, and the states all have checks on the supreme court. Hamilton shows in federalist number 81 that congress's check on lawless supreme lawless federal judges is to impeach them and remove them from office. The president has his oath of office as a check on the supreme court. The president's oath is to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution. It is not to obey the supreme court.
The supreme court was not set up in our constitution as the superior branch of the federal government. And then there's no need for me to well, Madison says in his report on the Virginia resolutions that it is a plain principle founded in common sense that the states as the sovereign parties to the constitution are the final authority on whether the federal government has violated the constitution and that we may that the states may check all three branches of the Federal Government, not just they may check the judiciary, the executive and the legislative branches by nullifying their acts. If the judicial branch connives with other branches in usurping powers, our constitution will be destroyed if we do not stop them. This is what James Madison said in his notes on nullify in his report on the Virginia resolution. Sorry I didn't have time to finish.
I hope that during questions someone will ask me about the so called nullification crisis of eighteen thirty two.
Speaker 0: Thank thank you very much for your comments.
@WyattCatarina - Catarina Senora Gatita
Hack all stations and let this play on a loop for 24 hours 😅 https://t.co/pjUQA2vDH9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since George Bush took office, 5,000,000 undocumented workers have come over the borders, creating an extraordinary problem. The American people are concerned because they are seeing their own economic position slip away, as employers exploit these workers by not paying minimum wage or observing worker safety laws.
A comprehensive solution is needed. As president, border security will be a priority. Employers must be held accountable for hiring undocumented workers. Currently, an employer has more of a chance of getting hit by lightning than being prosecuted for this, and that has to change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Administration, the Bush administration has done nothing to control the problem that we have. We've had 5,000,000 undocumented workers come over the borders, since George Bush took office. It has become an extraordinary problem, and the reason the American people are concerned is because they are seeing their own economic position slip away. And oftentimes, employers are exploiting these undocumented workers. They're not paying the minimum wage.
They're not observing worker safety laws. And so what we have to do is create a comprehensive solution to the problem. Now I have already stated that as president, I will make sure that we finally have the kind of border security that we need. That's step number one. Step number two is to take on employers.
Right now, they an employer has more of a chance of getting hit by lightning than be prosecuted for hiring an undocumented worker. That has to change. They have to be held account.