TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @goddek

goddek
Posted - February 27, 2026 at 3:49 PM
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 5:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report breaking investigation: Epstein files implicate transhumanist Bryan Bishop (@kanzure) in allegedly begging Jeffrey Epstein for $9.5M to produce “designer babies” and possibly human clones in five years. He claimed the first live birth would change everything, bragged about mouse surgeries in a Ukraine lab, plotted embryo implants, and sought total anonymity. We demand full exposure now.

@goddek - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨 BREAKING INVESTIGATION: Unearthed Epstein files expose transhumanist @kanzure (Bryan Bishop) BEGGING convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein for $9.5 MILLION to crank out “designer babies” AND HUMAN CLONES in just 5 years. He literally wrote: first live birth of a designer baby, and possibly a human clone, will change everything. World will never be the same. This is straight-up eugenics nightmare fuel funded by a sex criminal. DISGUSTING! SHOCKING DETAILS: Bishop bragged about mouse surgeries and microinjections at HIS UKRAINE LAB (!!!), some amateur messing with HUMAN SPERM mods (fluorescent tagging so far), and casually plotting embryo implants: “wait 9 months, great ending.” He vowed TOTAL anonymity so the engineered kids don’t get branded “freaks” in the media. That’s f*cking SICK, @kanzure. WHO ELSE KNEW about this Epstein-funded eugenics horror? Where EXACTLY in Ukraine was/is your mouse-surgery lab? What traits were you planning to ENGINEER into those babies? We DEMAND full exposure NOW!

goddek
Posted - February 11, 2026 at 4:03 AM
Saved - February 12, 2026 at 5:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been saying it for months and now it’s painfully obvious: Howard Lutnick is Donald Trump’s handler. The same Lutnick who survived 9/11 due to his son’s kindergarten day, who allegedly forced an Israeli loyalty test on White House staff, who was Epstein’s neighbor, who lied about cutting ties with Epstein in 2005, who visited Epstein Island with his four kids in 2012, and who thinks covering for pedophiles is funny. But sure, keep telling yourself Trump is in charge.

@goddek - Dr. Simon Goddek

I’ve been saying it for months and now it’s painfully obvious: @howardlutnick is Donald Trump’s handler. Yes, THAT Howard Lutnick. – The guy who survived 9/11 due to son's kindergarten day. – The guy who forced an Israeli loyalty test on White House staff. – The guy who just happened to be Jeffrey Epstein’s neighbor (what are the odds?). – The guy who lied about cutting ties with Epstein in 2005. – The guy who visited Epstein Island with his four kids in 2012. – The guy who thinks covering for pedophiles is funny. But sure, keep telling yourself Trump is in charge.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies the presence of “pretty bad people,” including those who spread fake news, as individuals who want to keep whatever is being discussed or circulating on a particular topic going. In contrast to these actors, the speaker asserts that credible information should be allowed and disseminated freely, implying that when information is credible, it should be provided or shared rather than suppressed. The core distinction the speaker makes is between those who would perpetuate a situation or narrative through dishonest or misleading information and those who contribute legitimate, trustworthy information. The speaker emphasizes a stance that credible information deserves exposure and availability and suggests a permissive approach toward information that meets credibility standards. The statement conveys a preference for ensuring credible information is not blocked or marginalized, even in the face of efforts by bad actors or misinformation to sustain the topic or narrative. The speaker’s position centers on allowing credible content to be distributed, while implicitly criticizing attempts to maintain or propagate false or misleading versions of events. The message underscores a dichotomy between misinformation and verifiable facts, advocating that only information deemed credible should be permitted to dominate or extend the discourse, whereas misleading or false content should not receive the same treatment. Overall, the speaker delineates a policy or principle: those who propagate fake or deceptive information aim to prolong a given situation, but credible information should be shared openly, and anything credible should be made available. The emphasis is on the value of credibility and the need to distinguish it from misleading or fabricated content, with a preference for letting credible information be accessible to the audience.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pretty bad people, including fake news, wanna keep something like like that going. But credible information, let them give it. Anything that's credible, I would say, let them have it.
goddek
Posted - January 31, 2026 at 11:15 AM
Saved - February 1, 2026 at 5:27 PM

@goddek - Dr. Simon Goddek

Half a year ago, @benshapiro insisted there was no Epstein list, no Epstein files, and no human trafficking. He even mocked Tucker Carlson and claimed Mossad had nothing to do with it. Now that the files are out, he’s suddenly silent. Why? https://t.co/WLn9wd9kyt

goddeketal
Posted - November 21, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting these points: Pollard as the worst spy who stole U.S. intel for Israel; Israel allegedly used Lewinsky tapes to pressure Clinton; Adelsons flew Pollard to Israel on a private jet; Adelsons later gave $100M+ to Trump; Huckabee meets Pollard in the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem as if they’re old friends. I’m left wondering when this narrative stops adding up.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Did you know this? – Jonathan Pollard was the worst spy in U.S. history, who stole U.S. intel for Israel. – Israel tried to use the Lewinsky tapes to pressure Clinton into releasing Pollard. – When he was freed, the Adelsons personally flew him to Israel on his private jet. – These are the same Adelsons who poured $100M+ into Trump’s campaign after which Trump became the most pro-Israel president in decades. – And now Mike Huckabee meets Pollard inside the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem like they’re old friends. At what point are we allowed to say “something doesn’t add up”?

goddeketal
Posted - November 17, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Saved - November 18, 2025 at 12:27 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I’ve warned for months: do yourself a favor and never translate Hebrew tweets. Now even X is starting to realize how brutally hateful and dehumanizing many Hebrew tweets truly are. https://t.co/of0MPMCHAO

goddeketal
Posted - November 6, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Saved - November 6, 2025 at 10:19 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨WOW! It’s been a long time since I’ve heard that many truth bombs. But think for yourself: who are you not allowed to criticize in America? https://t.co/5AeA6KXjk3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses how to tell if you are controlled: if there is somebody or something you’re not allowed to criticize. He gives historical examples: in Nazi Germany you couldn’t criticize the Nazi party; in the Soviet Union you couldn’t criticize the communist party of Russia; in China you can’t criticize the Chinese Communist Party; in North Korea you can’t criticize Kim Jong Un; in Cuba you can’t criticize the Cuban Communist Party. He then asks who you can’t criticize in America, and answers: the Jewish lobby, on both sides. He claims this shows who controls the country and asserts that the conversation is on the edge because it touches the third rail and breaks a taboo about power. Speaker 1 interjects that Dave Smith isn’t allowed to criticize Israel, noting that both sides have issues. Speaker 2 adds that it isn’t allowed to criticize, repeating that you’re not allowed to. Speaker 0 concludes by stating that this proves they control America and that they control free speech in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An easy way to know if you are controlled. Is there somebody or something that you're not allowed to criticize? That's right. Simple as that. If you lived in Nazi Germany, you couldn't criticize the Nazi party. If you lived in the Soviet Union, you couldn't criticize the communist party of Russia. If you live in China right now, you can't criticize the Chinese communist party. If you live in North Korea, you can't criticize Kim Jong un. If you live in Cuba, you can't criticize the Cuban Communist Party. If you live in America, who can't you criticize? Who? Who can't you criticize in America? The Jewish lobby? Yes. On both sides. Right. That's right. That's that's tells you who controls the country. You're not the fact that we're having this discussion and we're on the edge. Alright? Everybody knows here. This is the edge. Oh, yeah. Why are we on the edge? Because we're touching the third rail. We're breaking the taboo. You're not allowed to discuss the power of the Israeli lobby in America. Speaker 1: Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. You know, the Israeli side was Speaker 2: a little resenting, though. No. You're not allowed to. Was it not allowed to? You're not allowed to. Speaker 0: That's proof right there. They control America. That's who's controlling free speech in this country.
goddeketal
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - November 4, 2025 at 8:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I grew up pro-Jewish and pro-Israel, naïve to the harms Palestinians faced. A PhD shift changed me: learning about the Nakba, Balfour, and colonization exposed the ugliness behind the Zionist narrative. Now I see Zionism as domination, not survival, and reject the demonization of critics. I still seek peace, truth, and humanity, and I’m grateful for the clarity I found. Thank you.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Growing up in Germany, the Netherlands, and the American Midwest, I was extremely pro-Jewish and extremely pro-Israel. I believed every bit of the narrative we were fed. I even had a Palestinian guy in my class, and whenever he talked about his situation, I’d get angry. I called him an anti-Semite more than once. Looking back, I feel ashamed of how deeply I had internalized that mindset. I genuinely thought Judaism was the best religion in the world. I even considered converting at one point to support these “poor, prosecuted people”. That’s how far gone I was. And all of that happened without me even knowing any Jews in real life. I had met maybe one or two in my life until a few years ago. That started to change during my PhD. We had a research partnership with a Hebrew university. The academics we worked with were hardcore Zionists. They talked about Palestinians like animals. Justified the killings. Brushed off the land theft. That’s when the mask began to fall. I started digging. I learned about the Balfour Declaration, how American Zionists played a role in destabilizing my own country of birth. I learned about the Nakba. How settlers destroyed water wells and entire orchards. How people who had lived there for centuries were treated like subhumans. I saw the ugly truth no one ever talks about. Even up to October 7th, I still thought: there are good Jews and bad Jews, just like in any group. But since then, what I’ve witnessed is beyond shocking. Almost every Jewish voice I’ve come across, online, in media, in real life, has been defending genocide. Demonizing anyone who dares speak up for Palestinians. Calling people Nazis, animals, anti-Semites, just for standing on the side of humanity. That kind of moral blackmail used to work on me. Being called an anti-Semite as a German? That was the worst thing you could say. But not anymore. Not after seeing who’s really fueling the hate. Not after hearing the things that are being said… things that sound like they came straight from hell. What changed me was not hate, it was clarity. I realized Zionism is not about survival but dominance, and it has nothing in common with Christian values, either. And honestly, what still puzzles me, what I genuinely don’t understand, is why they behave the way they do. They say they want peace. They say they’ve been hated throughout history, kicked out of country after country, persecuted without reason. But then you look at how they act,right now. They smear anyone who dares to criticize Israel. They slander. They don’t try to make allies, they issue threats. They demand people be canceled. They justify war crimes. They talk about exterminating others. If they really want to be liked, if they want to live in peace, if they want people to stop criticizing them, then why do they act like this? Why don’t they try kindness, truth, humility? Why not show some decency, some humanity, especially now that the entire world is watching? It makes no sense, unless domination is the goal. Not peace. Not coexistence. Because when I listen to people like Mark Levin or Ben Shapiro or that Randy Fine dude, what I hear isn’t just propaganda, but pure venom. It’s a kind of moral filth that feels like it crawled out of hell. The arrogance. The dehumanization. The glee in war and death. You can’t act like this and expect the world like you. You can’t demand sympathy while trying to silence those who demand the truth. You can’t play eternal victim while behaving like a tyrant. Eventually, people wake up. Just like I did. I used to believe everything they told me. Now I see it clearly. Thank you! 🙏🏼

goddeketal
Posted - January 24, 2021 at 11:05 AM
Saved - November 1, 2025 at 8:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I submitted a paper on the Bayes Lines Tool (BLT), a SQL-script that back-solves disease prevalence, test sensitivity, and specificity from government test results. By building confusion matrices (TP, FP, TN, FN) and testing many parameter combinations, BLT identifies likely values and evaluates policy relevance. For Jan 11, 2021 in the UK, I estimate prevalence ~4%, sensitivity ~80.5%, specificity ~92.5%, implying many false positives and overestimated prevalence.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ Happy to announce that we have submitted our #paper ‘Bayes Lines Tool (BLT) - A SQL-script for analyzing diagnostic test results with an application to SARS-CoV-2-testing’. In this ⬇️thread⬇️, I will explain why our tool is that powerful for decision makers. #UnbiasedScience

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2/ In the meantime, the submitted paper is available on the preprint platform @zenodo_org. Factual criticism is highly desired and encouraged. The publication itself presents a seminal Bayesian calculator, the Bayes Lines Tool (BLT). (Petje af, @waukema!) https://zenodo.org/record/4459271#.YAwjxhYxk2w

Bayes Lines Tool (BLT) - A SQL-script for analyzing diagnostic test results with an application to SARS-CoV-2-testing The performance of diagnostic tests crucially depends on the disease prevalence, test sensitivity, and test specificity. However, these quantities are often not well known when tests are performed outside clinical practice which makes the rating of the test results somewhat problematic. A current example is the mass testing taking place within the context of the world-wide SARS-CoV-2 crisis. Here, for the first time in history, the test results have a dramatic impact on political decisions. Therefore, transparent, comprehensible, and reliable data is mandatory. It is in the nature of wet lab tests that their quality and outcome are influenced by multiple factors reducing their performance by handling procedures, underlying test protocols, and analytical reagents. These limitations in sensitivity and specificity have to be taken into account when calculating the real test results. As a resolution method, we have developed a seminal Bayesian calculator, the Bayes Lines Tool (BLT), for back-solving disease prevalence, test sensitivity, test specificity, and, therefore, true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative numbers, from official test outcome reports. The calculator performs a simple SQL query and can easily be implemented on any system supporting SQL. We provide three examples of SARS-CoV-2 test results from official government reports from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom to illustrate the possible parameter space of prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity consistent with the observed data. Finally, we discuss this tool’s multiple applications, including its putative importance for informing policy decisions. zenodo.org

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3/ The Bayes Line Tool (available on https://bayeslines.org) is able to back-solve disease #prevalence, test #sensitivity, test #specificity, and therefore, true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative numbers from official governmental test outcome reports.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4/ This is done by creating confusion matrices with four variables. Namely: TP, FP, TN, FN. In order to calculate the matrices, we need prevalence, specificity, and sensitivity as well as the number of people that got tested (within a given period) and the number of positives.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5/ The number of positives and the number of tests are given by the government. Prevalence, specificity, and sensitivity are unknown. So we assume any combination of them ranging from 0-99%. These three combinations can amount up to #millions of #combinations.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6/ Typically, we calculate with 7 million combinations. Of these 7 million combinations, only 1-100 usually match the numbers that the government gave us (e.g. TRUE Positives + FALSE Positives = amount of performed tests).

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7/ For the 11 Jan 2021, 536,947 tests were performed, resulting in 56,733 reported positives. The confusion matrices contained 21 possible matches for that day, represented in the #columns. We have sorted the columns by ‘prevalence’, as marked in red.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8/ The prevalence in the UK is currently presumed to be 1,52% (https://bit.ly/3sRFSmw). Given the fact that reported positives dropped by 43% since January 8, we are looking at a prevalence of around 3%, but definitely lower than 12%, leaving us with the following options:

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9/ Looking at the bars will already give you a good #indication on the test result in the context of everyone else who got tested in the population. This means that the model tells us whether the test results are/were #relevant.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10/ In the next steps, I will show you how to figure out which event might most likely have been the one that occurred that day, figuring out the real TP/FP rate, test specificity and sensitivity and prevalence. For this, let’s take a look at the tests' sensitivity.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11/ In the UK antigen and PCR tests are used. Antigen tests have a sensitivity between .664 (66.4%) and .738 (73.8%) (https://bit.ly/2Y5konY). PCR tests about .842 (84.2%) (https://bit.ly/3ogUAj7). PCR tests constitute the majority of tests that are used in the UK.

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly
Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12/ We are consequently looking for a sensitivity value just below .842. #BINGO! By just getting the amount of performed tests and number of reported positives from the government, we can conclude the actual specificity, sensitivity, and prevalence.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13/ So on January 11th, the prevalence was most likely about 4%, the tests’ sensitivity about 80.5%, and the tests’ specificity about 92.5% (which is much lower than the claimed 98.9%: https://bit.ly/2Y5nEjf). The false-positive rate that day would consequently have been 68%!

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14/ Let’s have a look at the calculated data that the Netherlands are providing.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15/ AFAIK, the #Dutch government did not make a recent comment about prevalence, but we can assume a similar one as in the UK. Also, the sensitivity should be in the range of 75-85%, leaving us with the following possible scenarios. Remark: note the low #specificities < 90%.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16/ The model’s outcomes are extremely valuable in that they can provide a decision-making tool for people in charge (i.e. #politicians, #physicians, #policymakers etc.) and support them in evaluating their strategy for fighting the disease. #COVID

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17/ This time-series can be further back-solved by solving single events following the #exclusionprinciple and consequently receiving insights with respect to the tests’ specificity/sensitivity or the prevalence within the population.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18/ This method provides the light (i.e. better insights) for individuals, authorities and governmental agencies that are currently in the dark with measuring problems and often using imprecise prediction models.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19/ Furthermore, the outcomes can provide a better insight into the expectable operational effectiveness of the tests (specificity/sensitivity) compared to the theoretical commercial claims of the manufacturers (equipment, primers, probes, supplies etc.).

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20 Last but not least, the tool can also be used to provide extensive time-series (see graph). If you want to be the first to receive updates around our Bayes Lines Tool feel free to join our #UnbiasedScience-Telegram channel via the following link: https://t.me/unbiasedscience

Telegram: Contact @unbiasedscience t.me

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21/ P.S. Here is another brilliant thread on Bayes’ Theorem that you might want to read. (Outstanding work @robinmonotti) https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1336593397608542208.html

Read and Share Twitter Threads easily! Thread Reader helps you discover and read the best of Twitter Threads threadreaderapp.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Take-away message for the layperson. What we see is most likely the following: - Extremely high rate of false positives - Much lower test specificity than reported by the test manufacturers - Overestimation of the prevalence

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@AlexTweetyC Link?

goddeketal
Posted - March 2, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 2:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the Gulf of Tonkin incident as a staged false-flag used to justify the U.S. war in Vietnam, costing millions of lives. The USS Liberty attack was a deliberate strike by Israel on an American ship, killing and wounding sailors, yet covered up with no consequences. One became a long war; the other was excused as the “good guys.” That shows geopolitics ruled by power, not morality.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a staged event used to justify the U.S. war in Vietnam, costing millions of lives. The USS Liberty attack, on the other hand, was a deliberate strike by Israel on an American ship, killing and wounding U.S. sailors. Yet it was covered up, and no consequences followed. One was a false-flag attack that led to years of war; the other was excused because the perpetrators were considered the “good guys.” That’s all you need to know about how geopolitics is ruled by power, not morality.

goddeketal
Posted - September 10, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 10:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expresses frustration, claiming the left is responsible for COVID, censorship, and the potential death of Charlie Kirk, labeling their actions as evil and urging for resistance to protect freedom. Another user responds, accusing leftists of celebrating Kirk's shooting.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I’m done. I’m fully radicalized. The left unleashed COVID, censored the truth, and now they’ve most likely killed Charlie Kirk. THIS IS EVIL. Human life means nothing to them. They silence. They kill. And if we don’t rise up now, there won’t be any freedom left to fight for.

@TheImmortal007 - The Immortal

@goddeketal deranged leftists are celebrating Charlie Kirk being shot https://t.co/R8wlXdmrId

goddeketal
Posted - September 10, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 10:44 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I’m done. I’m fully radicalized. The left unleashed COVID, censored the truth, and now they’ve most likely killed Charlie Kirk. THIS IS EVIL. Human life means nothing to them. They silence. They kill. And if we don’t rise up now, there won’t be any freedom left to fight for.

goddeketal
Posted - July 8, 2025 at 1:41 PM
Saved - July 27, 2025 at 3:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses suspicions surrounding the circumstances of Jeffrey Epstein's death, suggesting the scene appeared staged. Key points include discrepancies in photo timestamps, the positioning of Epstein's body, and the sudden replacement of paramedics. Observers note inconsistencies in autopsy images and the presence of two vans leaving the hospital, implying a cover-up. The release of cell footage with missing segments raises further doubts. The discussion posits that Epstein's death was orchestrated, linking him to intelligence operations and broader systemic issues.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

THREAD: There’s something deeply off with those infamous photos of Jeffrey Epstein being wheeled out of the ambulance. The whole scene looks staged. That man didn’t kill himself. Hell, he might not even be dead. Let’s break it down. 🧵

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 The timestamps on the photos tell the whole story. First shot was taken at 7:24:12 AM. Epstein has no tube in his mouth. Eight seconds later, new photo, suddenly there’s a tube. Then the edited version hits the media by 9:49 AM.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 This means that the @nypost reversed the photo order. The image with the breathing tube came after the one without it. That alone proves the narrative was scripted. The media didn’t document what happened. They helped stage what didn’t.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #4 Also Epstein’s arm is bent in a way no unconscious body could hold. The tube looks misplaced, if it’s even real. The guy doing “CPR” wasn’t in the shot seconds earlier. It’s looking rather like a staged performance, and clearly not a resuscitation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #5 The whole thing happened in the ambulance bay. Look at the red boards, electrical panel, sliding door. No movement. No hallway. He was never taken inside. He was displayed, photographed, and mysteriously disappeared.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #6 What’s astonishing is that, within 11 seconds, the real paramedics are replaced by clean-cut guys without EMS patches. Remember these FBI sightseeing tourists at the “Justice for J6” in Sept 2021? Same vibes.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #7 Months later, Bill Farrington quietly drops another photo. It shows the original medics, seconds earlier. Why hold it back? Because it shows the swap. The original crew was real. The ones who followed weren’t.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #8 The autopsy pics are also a joke. The face has a clear mask line by the ear. The body is hairier, slimmer, wrong. The tube is back in his mouth, reinserted just for the shot. This doesn’t make any sense.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #9 What matters most is this: two vans left the hospital that day. One out front, one out back. The press followed the decoy. The real handoff happened where no one was watching. They didn’t kill—they moved him. And the footage they dropped yesterday only makes that more obvious.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #10 Yesterday, the DOJ released 10 hours of Epstein cell footage, and got caught cutting out a full 60 seconds. The feed jumps clean from 11:59:00 to 12:00:00. No explanation… just gone. That’s probably the exact moment he was calmly walked out of his cell. Alive.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #11 First they broke the cams, then they faked the pics and lost the footage. And years later, they still can’t explain who signed off on what, or why someone is still using Epstein’s bank account. And @nypost’s Bill Farrington never wanted to talk about his world famous coup.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #12 If you still think the official story holds up, watch the clip of Dan Bongino and Kash Patel saying Epstein killed himself. Look at their faces. They don’t believe a word of what they’re saying. Someone told them to say it. Someone else is holding the strings.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #13 This was never just about Epstein. He worked for intelligence. He ran a blackmail operation using sex trafficking, same playbook as Robert Maxwell. Mossad asset, just like the man who made Ghislaine. The people in charge aren’t Bongino or Patel. They’re puppets too.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #14 Still think Epstein is dead? Start here. This article breaks it all down: photo by photo, frame by frame, argument by argument. The media lied. The government staged it. Pedophiles are running the system. https://www.arkmedic.info/p/william-farrington-and-the-pedophile

William Farrington and the Pedophile Why did William Farrington cover up for Jeffrey Epstein, the world's most famous child trafficker? A forensic review of "those" pictures. arkmedic.info

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@nypost #15 Stay sharp. Stay skeptical. Use your eyes, your logic, and your gut. Nothing about this story adds up, and it was never meant to. If you agree that no politician deserves blind trust, and believe that Epstein is still alive, give me a follow. We’re just getting started. 🙏🏼

goddeketal
Posted - July 3, 2025 at 1:24 AM
Saved - July 4, 2025 at 1:41 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

This didn’t age well, @piersmorgan. https://t.co/AwzOJQhWMW

goddeketal
Posted - July 1, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 9:58 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@JEM_el_tarasco @RepFine @RepThomasMassie And yet… https://t.co/xebrujNSXV

goddeketal
Posted - July 1, 2025 at 4:21 PM
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 9:58 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Imagine calling @RepFine a very good guy and @RepThomasMassie a very bad guy. Even a flea on a rabid dog wouldn’t buy this dystopian gaslighting. https://t.co/ZaHJLsAVJf

goddeketal
Posted - July 1, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 2:47 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. NEVER FORGET. https://t.co/g1UTGPyRlE

goddeketal
Posted - June 17, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 3:11 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Just a quick reminder that Gad Saad, who’s trying to drag the U.S. into a war with Iran, openly admitted to working with Mossad. If you think @BenShapiro, @marklevinshow, @AlanDersh and @RubinReport aren’t part of the same network, you probably still believe CNN tells the truth. https://t.co/gIpinrUhmS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals he was a Mossad agent in his youth, a detail he expected to be a major focus of his media tour. At 18, he was approached by a cousin's friend and recruited for security tests. His first mission involved leaving a bag in an El Al office to test security response. A second, more complex mission involved attempting to interview the Israeli consul in Montreal with a fake gun hidden in his glove to test security layers. The speaker believes he fit the Mossad's profile due to his Lebanese-Jewish background and Arabic fluency, similar to the famous spy Eli Cohen. A third, more sensitive mission was planned, but his involvement ended when his mother found out and threatened to expose the operation, fearing for his safety. The speaker believes his cousin may have inadvertently revealed his activities to his mother.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I kind of couldn't believe it in the book. You let the cat out of the bag. You're actually a massage agent. Speaker 1: You know, you are the first person on my media tour to actually either have read that far into the book or to mention it. I thought it would be the top story in every show. Speaker 0: It's I mean, this is serious. This is serious stuff, and most people, you know, they're Speaker 1: not they're not as candid about this stuff, you know? I I thought that maybe I had extended this the statute of limitation, that they won't come after me at this point. Do you want me to tell that story? Yeah, sure. So that actually is something that I discuss in the chapter on play, the importance of living your life with a playful mindset. Now you might say, How does the Mossad fit with play? Well, so when I was about 18 years old, I had a cousin who had come from Israel, who said, Hey, you know, I have a friend of mine who would like to meet you, to chat with you. I'm thinking, For what purpose? He said, Oh, you know, he'll talk to you. So I meet this gentleman. He says, Oh, there are some guys who would like to meet you and see if you're interested in working with them. So I meet these gentlemen, who don't introduce themselves as being PASAD agents or whatever. They say, Oh, you know, we're interested in checking the quality of our security in various environments, would you be interested in being the person who does some of these tests for us? I said, Okay, tell me more. So the first mission that I went on was I was asked to go to an El Al office in Downtown Montreal, walk in there. Everything was scripted. They told me exactly what to do. Walk in with a bag, ask some questions, then take the bag, leave it there, and end up leaving without taking the bag. Speaker 0: Did you actually look in the bag before Speaker 1: you did I did not look in the bag. Like to think that there wasn't any bombs. So I did that, and then someone, a security person came, Oh, you forgot your bag, and so on. So the test was done successfully. I don't remember exactly how long after, a couple of weeks later, they asked to meet me again. They said, We have a more challenging mission for you. You are now a student at, think it was University of Montreal. It's a fake story that they're asking me to play a role. You're working on a paper, whatever, Israeli Palestinian conflict, you'd like to interview the Israeli consul in Montreal, and what we're going to do is in your glove, you know Montreal is a very cold place, in your gloves there's going to be a fake gun. And the idea is to then see if they catch now, this one was a lot more elaborate in that there were multiple layers of security, and in the final layer, if I can get through all of the different things, there would be a very detailed pat down. And I remember telling them, But what if he finds the gun and let me the fake gun? I said, Don't worry, we're behind this. Like, it's secure. And so I go through all the stages. The guy, and I notice that he's getting stressed. They ask him to stop. Now they're very happy because they're in a sense, I mean, I don't have confirmation of this, but I think it was two tests that were happening. Test one is literally the security. Test two is this guy, someone that is worthy to keep working with him. Because and again, I'm speculating here, but I think it's on solid ground. I'm kind of the dream of the Mossad and associated agencies, because I'm the Lebanese Jew who's a perfect Arabic speaker who left Lebanon. The most famous case of, in the Israeli spy game, is someone named Eli Cohen, who was executed by the Syrians, having infiltrated the highest ranks of Syrian society, who, because he was a perfect Arabic speaker, was able to infiltrate the highest society of Syria. And so, I can't know for sure that that's where I was heading, but it certainly seemed as though they were testing me. And there was a third mission, which apparently I was told I shouldn't speak too much about it based on the legal review of my book from my publisher, but where I was going to go on a third mission that kind of raised the stakes of what I was being tested on. And as I tell in the book, what ended it is something that the Mossad is apparently very afraid of, and that's the angry Jewish mother. And so apparently my mother found out, and the only way that she could have found out, by the way, because I never told anybody. I didn't even tell anybody these stories for something like twenty five years after the fact. It might have well been my now wife who first maybe I was trying to impress her when we were going out on our first courtship dating. And so I think my it must have been my cousin who would have told her because there's no other way that there would have been a leak that must have said, Oh, know, God is doing really well. He's working well with this guy, whatever. And then she ended up saying, you know, this has to end. She was gonna blow it in the open. These guys don't really like to have a lot of attention. And so that was the end of my Israeli spy game career.
goddeketal
Posted - June 13, 2025 at 5:16 AM
Saved - June 13, 2025 at 9:22 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

> Israel attacks Iran > Normal Americans: “What the fvck?” > Politicians: “We stand with Israel.” > Every statement reads like it came straight from AIPAC HQ In case you were wondering: yes, you're living in an occupied country. https://t.co/MrjhzKSGys

goddeketal
Posted - May 28, 2025 at 4:48 AM
Saved - May 29, 2025 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how to navigate interactions with Mossad agents, referencing Mike Benz's views on NGOs and their influence. I expressed concern about Benz, noting that he avoids discussing AIPAC and similar groups, which raises red flags. I highlighted his past with the "Frame Game" account, which pushed harmful narratives while masquerading as a deradicalization effort. His sudden emergence in the public eye and the lack of a prior digital footprint suggest a carefully crafted persona. I urge others to investigate his background, as it seems orchestrated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

How to deal with Mossad agents. (receipts in the comments) https://t.co/4Rp9SCGUfQ

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Mike Benz on how NGOs run the world on behalf of a small number of very dangerous people. (0:00) Introduction (1:20) What Are NGOs? (5:11) The 3 Levels of The Blob (9:00) Why the CIA Was Really Created (21:41) Why So Many American Companies Are Wrapped up in the NGO Madness (24:02) George Soros’ Open Society Foundation (30:54) Foreign Governments’ Failed Attempts to Escape NGO Control (36:58) The Dark Side of America’s Global Domination (42:14) The Soros Connection to the State Department Is Deeper Than You Think (50:33) How the CIA Controls the Education System (58:03) The Anti-American Agendas American Taxpayers Are Funding (1:01:19) What You Should Know About the US Institute of Peace (1:11:57) What DOGE Found When They Tried to Shut Down the Institute of Peace (1:15:31) Why The Blob Hates Putin (1:22:21) George Soros’ Coup of Mongolia (1:30:57) The Blob’s Regime Change Strategy Playing Out in the US (1:42:48) How Trump Has Successfully Drained the Swamp So Far (1:54:06) What Trump Should Focus On Next Includes paid partnerships.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Institute of Peace is compared to the National Endowment for Democracy, with both accused of being "aggressively anti-peace." NGOs are described as the "stem cell of the government's central nervous system," originating with the US income tax in 1913 and becoming fronts for the CIA. These organizations allegedly serve as deniable channels for money, contacts, and guidance, influencing groups without direct US government involvement. A "donor drafter class," including figures like George Soros and Bill Gates, influences policy by drafting off the US government. George Kennan's 1948 memo, "Inauguration of Organized Political Warfare," is cited as a blueprint for American power, using NGOs to rig elections, such as in Italy. The CIA, State Department, and corporations form a "blob" to advance US interests, with NGOs acting as back channels for diplomacy and financial assistance. The Open Society Foundation is accused of synchronizing US foreign policy with its own, influencing governments and speculating on currencies. El Salvador's 30% tax on foreign funding of domestic NGOs is noted as a significant move. The US Institute of Peace is criticized for its stance on opium production in Afghanistan and alleged payments to the Taliban. The discussion touches on the historical context of NGOs, their role in regime change, and their connections to corporate interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The US Institute of Peace was think of it like the National Endowment for Democracy. Is George Orwell in Speaker 1: charge of naming these groups? National Endowment for Democracy subverts democracy. You know, all these peace groups are, like, aggressively anti peace. Speaker 0: You can check out these protests online. They're hilarious. It's it's people protesting in the streets so that they are not allowed to know foreign funding of their own societies. Speaker 2: Put the blindfolders on me. I'm not allowed to know whether that is funded by Speaker 0: a foreign government. How much is funding? The CIA was running a initiative to control the education space during the Cold War to stop the spread of communist sympathizing teachings and curricula. All this was repurposed against right wing populism when Trump won in 2016. I noticed, according to George Soros, the Open Society Foundation was to provide a basically a tax loophole for his kids. Nate became such a powerful force in Washington that we had to synchronize US foreign policy with the foreign policy set out by the Open Society Foundation. Speaker 1: NGOs, you hear the term all the time, and in fact, the the deeper you look into almost any news story, especially one that pertains to the destruction of Western civilization in The United States, you find something called an NGO at the bottom of the story. NGO stands for nongovernmental organization, but paradoxically, NGOs feel like a parallel government to me. You've done a lot of research on this. I don't think this topic's talked about enough, so I'm just going to stand back and let you explain what an NGO is, where they came from, and what role they occupy in the modern West. Speaker 0: Yeah. NGOs are the stem cell of the government's central nervous system. They are this highly flexible tool, just like a stem cell can transform into any of the two twenty different cell types in the human body, and they self renew, and they can generate all these new neurons. That is really You can't disentangle or really separate the government from the nongovernmental organizations. This started in its origin really with the creation of The US income tax in 1913, and then in 1917 contributions to charitable organizations, to five zero one c threes as we now know it, became tax deductible from this new income tax. And so, that gave rise to this money flow into private foundations and into nonprofit organizations that would come to play a large role in the in both World Wars, but in particular World War II, when humanitarian relief began to be a big part of OSS, and the predecessor to the CIA, and military financial assistance to groups in afflicted by World War two, and then in particular during the Marshall Plan after World War two, NGOs played a key role in being a deniable front to run money, to establish contacts, and to provide direction and guidance to groups that the US government did not want to be caught necessarily doing directly. And so you can trace this back really. You have all these Speaker 1: They were fronts, a lot of them, or at least in part. Speaker 0: So it's a complicated relationship because you have government agencies, and then you have outside high net worth individuals and families, dynastic American families, like the Fords, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, all starting these private philanthropies, all playing a role in US statecraft, all having international businesses that rely on foreign markets. And so they're highly dependent on the State Department clearing the way for them, negotiating deals for them, acquiring territory, creating export markets, maintaining laws in foreign countries that maximize profitability, securing mining rights, securing trade routes. So there's this complex interplay. This is why I always call so the story is really about I don't really think of it as a as a government being different than an NGO, as being different than this corporate financial overclass. When I used the term the blob, which is not my term, you know, that was a term from Obama's deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, to describe a force within Washington that was bigger than the White House, that the Obama White House felt like it couldn't get its foreign policy done because this foreign policy establishment, this blob structure seemed to be more powerful than that. But I think of the blob as having three three levels to it. You have the the guts of it inside the government, which is the State Department, the Defense Department, the Intelligence Community, and and USAID. You can think of it, Hillary Clinton would call this the the three d model. Diplomacy, defense, and development. And then the IC plays, the CIA for example, plays a supporting role in those functions. And these are all merged together as one cohesive way of advancing US foreign policy, what we call it. But it's really advancing the interests of, generally speaking, insiders or national champions like our large multinational corporations. But bring this back, so you have this this government structure in the center of it. And then below that, you have the NGOs who are funded by the US government, and who work alongside the US government, and have a longer reach than the US government. The State Department can't just walk into certain conflict zones, and talk to the indigenous community, and get honest answers, or tell them what to do without being on the record saying something they might not want attributed to them. The NGOs can go in and do that. The NGOs can serve as the back channels for diplomacy. The NGOs can provide a plausible way of providing financial assistance, or money, or bribes to to various groups to run shipments, and arms, and to create networks of assets that that then a assistant secretary of state can then liaise with. So there's this this network creation level, and there's this influence level at the bottom. But above that above that government level is what I call the donor drafter class, which is, and you know, everyone understands the concept of big donors having a big influence on politics. Not only do they largely play the key role in in determining who's president through the funding that they provide, but they I I say donor drafter because they draft off the policies off of the US government. They don't just donate into it. Like in a bike race, you always want to be not in first. You want to be right behind the guy in first, so that the guy in first is cutting the wind for you, so that you don't suffer the cost of the the extra exertion to cut cut the wind. The Pentagon cuts the wind for companies, for multinational corporations. The State Department cuts the wind for multinational corporations and private equity funds and the whole financial overclass. The the CIA cuts the wind for corporations and financial firms. The USAID cuts the wind. And so you have these figures like George Soros, for example, and Bill Gates, who are now obviously very well renowned in the NGO world. The Open Society Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and then also, you know, Rockefeller, Carnegie Foundation, Ford Foundation, all of these. All of these have corporations and financial firms attached to their philanthropy. And when they so they will receive funding from the US government, from USAID, or their portfolio assets will, or their portfolio NGOs, or companies will. But they will also donate into it. And I bring this up because oftentimes, they are paid by the government, but oftentimes they're actually paying into a government project that advances some other interest. And I can go through a bunch of examples of this, but maybe I'll come back to the history real real quick. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: So in 1948, this was the start of the intelligence state in America. It was NSC 10 dash two authored by George Kennan, gave the CIA its plausible deniability doctrine that allowed you to that allowed the CIA to have a license to lie. The CIA came into creation I'm just take a quick look here. The CIA was created because the State Department wanted dirty deeds done without being attributed to the State Department. So they needed some outside agency which could do what what George Kennan called two months before he authored the plausible deniability doctrine in NSC 10 dash two. He called this the inauguration of organized political warfare. This is a very little known memo that was not declassified, I believe, until 02/2005. It was written in 1948. Everyone knows George Kennan as the head of the policy planning staff at the State Department, as the author of the containment strategy Yes. Russia and the Cold War. One of the most celebrated folks in US diplomacy history. But two months before granting this license to do all this, to have the CIA operate through NGOs, through civil society organizations, through private foundations, through you know, these astroturf grassroots advocacy nonprofits. He wrote this memo called the organization, the inauguration of organized political warfare. And he argues that this is now April 1948. We had just effectively rigged the nineteen forty eight Italian election. April eighteenth nineteen forty eight. We had wanted this was the first democratic election in Italy, which after World War two had ended. And we had pitted basically a pro US, pro Western democracy candidate versus a pro Soviet autocracy candidate was how how it was pitched. And the very first national security memo, one dash one, was on the central importance of Italy to The US position at the dawn of the Cold War, and that we could not afford to lose this election. And so the very first covert action of the Central Intelligence Agency, because in '19 under the 1947 act, it was largely conceived of this being an intelligence collection agency, not so much operations. The CI has two different career tracks. Right. Intelligence, you know, they call it the analyst track, and the operations track, and they're very different breeds of people. They're very, very different in what they do. One of them, you know, you collect the intelligence and you synthesize it for policymakers at the State Department, or at the White House National Security Council. Speaker 1: A lot of reading, a lot of foreign websites. Speaker 0: Yes. A lot of academics. Speaker 1: Yeah. And Speaker 0: the operations is where you get, you know, the berry seal, cocaine cowboy types, and you know, these, you know, the kind of wild folks who go in and do the dirty work to overthrow democratically elected governments, or to do Speaker 1: the So people talk about the CI, they're talking about the director of operations, really. Yeah. That's what people, in the popular imagination, that's what a CI officer is. Speaker 0: True. Although John Brennan was an analyst track his whole career, and you know, I don't know that that makes a more charitable case than the operations side, but but the fact is is Kennen writes this memo in 1948, '12 days after The US had rigged the Italian election in 1948, and that's what it was. Miles Copeland, who was one of the leaders of that from the CIA side, wrote in a biography later in his life that without CIA intervention in that election, we would have lost 60 to 40. Speaker 1: I believe I believe his son went on to play the drums in the police. Stuart Copeland. Speaker 0: Well, and and and Miles Copeland, Speaker 1: the the I think I may be getting that wrong. I Speaker 0: Well, grandson actually went on to be, I think, the manager for Sting, R e R e M, a bunch of these major bands, and then teamed up with Donald Rumsfeld in order to help do music diplomacy in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is a whole other, you know, family of secrets. Speaker 1: You probably heard about Eight Sleep. Lots of people are talking about it. It is a company with one mission, improving your sleep, and it's changing the way people do that, the way they get a good night's rest. We just got word that their team is launching a new product. It's called the Pod five. It's an original and innovative mattress cover plus a blanket that uses precision temperature control to regulate your body's sleep cycles and give you the perfect sleep, which really, really matters. It can range all the way from 55 degrees to a 10 degrees, meaning that you're covered no matter what. It's like electric blanket to the next level, but also a cooling blanket. So it makes you sleep better. Temperature has a massive effect on the way you sleep. By the way, it also detects snoring, and then it adjusts your bed position to reduce or completely stop it. So there are a lot of ladies in America who are going be grateful for this product. Everybody who works here will tell you, because they all use it, that there's no better way to be alert, productive, and happy than by sleeping well, and Eight Sleep really does help. Visit 8Sleep.com/Tucker. Use the code Tucker to get $350 off your pod five ultra. If you don't like it, you return it within a month. That won't happen. We think you'll love it, but you can if you want. 8Sleep.com/tucker. Speaker 0: What happens is is in nine in the nineteen forty eight election, the CIA, which does not it did not really have the authorization to do what it did. It was a last minute, last ditch, hail Mary effort to swing the election, and they took the assets that they had had from World War II, backing, you know, at that time, the the OSS, the the War Department, before in 1948 it changed to the Defense Department. The War Department had worked closely with the with the Vatican, with the church, as well as with mafia organizations, organized crime organize organized crime factions in Italy that were being prosecuted by Mussolini, and we were teamed up with them. They gave us access to ports, to to infrastructure, to safe houses. They were a big network, pro US network node during the during World War II, and because of their influence on unions, they allowed us to run arms, know, run transshipments of supplies, food, assistance, all of that. Just one of the reasons that the Italian mafia was protected for sixty years, a very much a cold war asset for The US. But, so the CIA achieves a successful result in April 1948, and they do so by using NGOs. They use charity fronts. They use philanthropic foundations to to funnel money and assistance in. They work through the unions and the trade labor associations, which are civil society organizations that you can consider in the NGO fold. They work through all of these charities, foundations, nonprofits, the NGO sphere, in order to run-in order to run this election rigging in 1948. So twelve days later, George Kennan writes a memo from the US State Department called the Inauguration of War and Ass Political Warfare, and everyone can look this up online. And he lays out how this is the model blueprint for the American power in the twentieth century, and that we need to overcome the basic distinction between peace and war that Americans have long believed there was, because the average American does not understand the intricacies of international relations, and if we don't if we don't seize this initiative to build an organized political warfare apparatus through this State Department intelligence function, then we will lose the American century, we'll lose the twentieth century to the Bolsheviks, or to the British, who each have their own department of dirty tricks. And so it goes on to say that this is a State Department function. Ideally it would be within a State Department bureau of political warfare, so I think what the the director of political warfare is what they wanted to call this until they decided. And in the memo he says that there are problems with this, which is that because the state department has provides a public audit of its funds, we would not be able to conceal these funds in the State Department budget. So it might be ideal to have an outside intelligence agency to to take on this function, and that's why two months later, the CIA was given the plausible deniability doctrine, and given delegated these powers by that very author, George Kennan. But at the back of this memo are fascinating exhibits of contemplated ways to structure recommendations and proposals for structuring this CIA intelligence work through NGOs. And it includes creating, for example, voluntary councils of an outside organization that would nominally look to the public like it was a grassroots organization that is helmed by fine upstanding members of the American establishment, or people in in great repute. He actually uses the line, members of the American business community of the caliber of Alan Dulles. Course, Alan Dulles was the CIA chief, but they would A Speaker 1: true criminal. Speaker 0: Right. And at the time his brother was running the state department, but and it goes on to say that it would look to the world like it's an NGO, but it would be it would receive funding from the CIA. It would receive guidance from the CIA, and it would constantly coordinate. And it was at that very year that the term NGO really became a codified term when the term nongovernmental organization was entered into the charter of the UN declaration on human rights in 1948, where the Economic and Social Council was directed to coordinate everything it did with with NGOs. And that's that's really what the sort of etymology of that term in terms of its explosions when the UN codified that term. And that's what essentially set off this NGO arms race, this proliferation of cells within American statecraft, the American business community, within the American intelligence community, the national security community, to each create their own cellular circuitry in order to advance their interests. And I can get sort of deeper into that story if you'd like, I can just take it from history there to present. But I'd feel remiss if I didn't also note that there's a government, and there's a business side of it. And the thing that I think a lot of people are missing in this story, in the attempt to take on the rogue elements of the NGOplex, is that last time we talked, I I It was right after USAID had Correct. Announced its closure. And I took what a lot of people I think thought was a somber tone on that, that I was celebrating its shutdown, but I was braced for impact about the ramifications of of this, and how it might play out. And I think I used the term that, you know, this is necessary to do this open heart surgery. We also have to ensure that the patient doesn't die on the operating table. Just because it's the right diagnosis doesn't mean, you know, you can set it and forget it. If you don't midwife the process diligently, you could kill the entire American empire. And I bring up that point here because it's not just American intelligence, and American statecraft, and you know, the State Department, the DOD, the CIA. It's also virtually every single major international corporation that we consider to be American, that is wrapped up in this NGO plex. And if you and I can go through examples of of how that manifests, but I I can't think of a single industry on that's domiciled in America, that people think of as as great American companies, that is not deeply connected to the NGOplex, and in some respects dependent on the NGOplex to secure their markets, to secure their, you know, their profitability, to secure their revenues, to to secure their interests. And while we are taking on the NGOplex, there's also this and now they're going to make their voices heard through lobbying, through pressuring Congress, and this is what we're seeing. The Congress is now looking like they're not going to codify these Doge cuts. We saw 26, I think, Republican members of Congress who are saying they're not going to approve the Doge cuts around USAID. But a lot of this is, I think to to find the solution that is politically possible, you have to understand, I guess, how the whole ecosystem works in order to provide offer solutions that might have political viability, if that if if that makes sense. Speaker 1: Of course. Of course, it does. So nongovernmental is actually a sort of misleading description because they're paragovernmental Yes. It sounds like. Speaker 0: Yes. You know, they're not Speaker 1: I mean, we're led to believe they're like, you know, doctors without borders or whatever, you know, that which I'm not against for the record, but, like, whatever the famous NGO is going into South Sudan to save people, they're acting totally independent. They're nongovernmental, but that as you just described so capably, that that's a lie. Speaker 0: Well, this sort of gets down to the stem cell concept and what type of NGO cell type you're talking about. I'll give you a couple examples. So there are these paragovernmental ones, like take for example, the Open Society Foundation. Started in 1979, according to George Soros, it was to provide a basically a tax loophole for his kids. That was the idea that he said. And then it quickly became wrapped up with the US State Department operating in all of the major Cold War hubs, especially in Eastern Europe, and fomenting the turnover of those governments so that they would break away from the Soviet Union and join join The US and Hungary, Romania, Poland, you know, the the whole the whole litany. And meanwhile, he was running the the, you know, the Quantum Fund and his George Soros management fund that was speculating on the foreign currencies of all these governments. So while he's working with the State Department, and the Central Intelligence Agency, and every US embassy, and every country in Eastern Europe, and using this foundation, this this network to influence the course of those events, so that their governments would flip. He's using his hedge fund to speculate way before anyone knows that this is this movement is even being cultivated by the State Department and by his own nonprofits. He's speculating on the the direction of those currencies. So he's got insider trading knowledge of everything that's going to happen in these countries while he's betting on it. Sort of like the Nancy Pelosi stock, you know, tracker type type of thing. But by by the nineteen nineties, the Open Society Foundation had become such a powerful force in Washington that Bill Clinton's deputy secretary of state, I think it was Strobe Talbot, who said, we think of the Open Society Foundation as being a independent, but allied partner country, like The UK, or France, or Germany. And so we work closely with the Open Society Foundation. We consider them an ally, but we have to synchronize US foreign policy with the foreign policy set out by the Open Society Foundation. This is a quote, everyone can look this up, it's it's on my timeline on X. But so this is in the nineteen nineties, this is thirty years ago at this point. US foreign policy is being synchronized with the George Soros policy recommendations, and a lot of this is because it's not just that George Soros is the largest donor to the Democrat party, and you know, Bill Clinton's obviously the Democrat president. George Soros, you know, provided two and a half times more than any other single individual to the Democrats in the last election cycle. Speaker 1: But it's that In in this, just this last election? Speaker 0: Yeah. For Joe Biden, hundred million dollars. I think the second largest was 40. That's crazy. Yeah. And although that may be the twenty twenty election actually that I'm referring to with those numbers, because I think those were the numbers in 2024 pre election. So that may have been the twenty twenty election cycle. But I'm sure it's comparable for 2024. But so the other part of it though is that the Soros Foundation so it drafts off of those policies, and I can give you some crazy examples of this. In Mongolia, it's a particularly perfect example of this, but we'll come back to that in a sec. So it's not just that Soros donates to the political candidates who's running for president, who's running for attorney general, or who's running for district attorney. It's that the Soros Foundation is also a co investor and a co sponsor in government initiatives and government projects. At USAID, you will frequently find, almost constantly find that the the Open Society Foundation is a donor into USAID initiatives, a donor into state department initiatives. And this is what you frequently see when a government agency cannot get sufficient funds allocated from Congress. They need to reach into the NGO sphere or into the private sector with multinational companies to effectively co sponsor and provide the top up capital to get the amount of money they need to run this operation. Speaker 1: That's legal? Speaker 0: Not only is Speaker 1: it Can I just fund a war if I want? Can I just like send a check to the Pentagon to buy more I mean, I can we can have privately funded government? Speaker 0: Yeah. We've had it since the Banana Wars. We've, you know, we've we've had we've had this relationship for Speaker 1: In Honduras. Speaker 0: Yeah. Honduras, Guatemala. This has been a constant feature of American statecraft, you know, almost since the beginning, which is that you have a government national security interest, or a government commercial national interest, but then you also have the profiteers of those, of that government action in the private sector, in the for profit space, and also at the NGO layer to the extent that they're getting funded to do this work, or it satisfies the the wants of the sponsors of the NGOs. So, and this is what War is a Racket was about. If, you know, the Smedley Butler nineteen thirty six, you know, book about how, you know, all of the major multinational corporations were on the take for World War I. All of them were on the take for, you know, when he's talking about how he toppled governments in South America for, you know, what was it? The City National Bank Yeah. And, you know, the the petroleum companies and United Fruit. United Fruit, and, you know, the the But may I ask, I mean, Speaker 1: yes. I mean, of course, I knew that. I read it, but I didn't understand that they are not only the beneficiaries of these policies, but also the funders of the policies. Yes. Yes. So but that the problem with that conceptually is that it puts it's all beyond Democratic control. There's no I mean, that's like there's no way to vote out, you know, whoever, George Soros or Larry Fink or whatever. There's just kind of right? Speaker 0: Right. Well, it's a tectonic plate. It's it's something that shapes the fabric of what we consider democracy to be. And it's and I think arming everyone in America with the with the knowledge of that topography can shape the kinds of democratic action that you propose. Give me an example. I mean, this was just yesterday. The nation of El Salvador announced a 30% tax on every on all foreign funding of domestic NGOs within El Salvador. This is a shot heard around the world. There have been many attempts by countries to contain the NGO plex. Speaker 1: Yeah. Most famously in Hungary. Speaker 0: Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia. Every time they've been confronted with street protests, and attempts to pressure the parliament using civil disobedience in the same sort of State Department USAID, Soros Foundation type rent a riots. We saw saw that in Slovakia, Serbia. In Hungary, when they passed their NGO transparency bill, it was blocked by the EU. The EU intervened and said that you cannot enforce this NGO transparency law because What? Yes. Yes. And they threatened to cut them off of EU funding if they Speaker 1: Hungarians aren't allowed to know where the money's coming from into their own country? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. They called it the Russian law, by the way. Speaker 1: The Russia law? Yeah. It's bad, therefore, it's Russian. Speaker 0: Well, the idea was Russia had banned USAID, had banned the National Endowment for Democracy. A few I think in 2015 around then, this was after the pussy riot incident. Yeah. You know, this is sort of a little bit pre Navalny when they when the regime change was sort of from the right wing national side, we attempted a sort of left wing, you know, left wing anti fa type coup in Russia through, you know, the whole pussy riot and associated Speaker 1: Well, wasn't like an organic artistic expression, is what you're saying? Speaker 0: I mean, you can look up online the lead singer's pictures with Tony Blinken and standing at the State Department podium, and all the National Endowment for Democracy literature on it, and the The USA just look up USAID. Speaker 1: That wasn't just like an especially empowering form of feminism. It was tactical. Speaker 0: It was tactical feminism. And and it always is with people. Speaker 1: It always is. That's right. Well, you've heard a lot of complaining in the last couple of weeks since Donald Trump announced his new import tariffs on foreign made things. A lot of people don't like it, but the companies who make American products in America with American materials, they're pretty happy because they're not affected by this. They've been doing the right thing since the beginning. They're not paying tariffs because, again, they're making American products for Americans. Liberty Safe is a perfect example. Liberty Safe is not making its stuff in some foreign country. It's not made in China or Vietnam or India. It's made right here with American steel. They employ skilled American craftsmen who do an amazing job. That's why they make the best safes there are. They have the highest standards of quality and security, you don't have to worry that when you lock up things that you really care about, they're gonna get stolen. They're not. These are safes you can trust. I keep my father's shotguns in a Liberty safe at my house. When you buy Liberty, you support American jobs. You protect what matters most. Choose American steel, American craftsmanship, choose Liberty. Visit liberty safe dot com for more. Speaker 0: But what happened was is after all this stuff, they Russia passed this, you know, basically banned, you know, foreign NGOs, or or at least banned a huge subset and required all these, you know, this transparency around it, and they banned USAID and NED. And so when Hungary and Slovakia and Serbia, and all these Eastern European countries who were in the post Soviet orbit tried to pass transparency laws so that they could get a sense of how much of their own civil society cellular body was actually foreign assets of a foreign government, this was called these were referred to as Russian laws, the Russian law, because Russia had done this. But think about this. Speaker 1: This is so insane. Speaker 0: But but think about that framing. And you see, and you can check out these protests online. They're hilarious. It's it's people protesting in the streets so that they are not allowed to know foreign funding of their own societies. Speaker 2: I demand. I will I I am not allowed to know. Put the blindfolders on me. I'm not allowed to know that whether the newspapers I read, whether the union I'm a part of, whether the lawyers association I'm a part of, whether the the private company that pay that pays my paycheck, whether the public health sector, my hospitals, whether that is funded by Speaker 0: a foreign government and how much how much is funding. And, you know, the Russians are not complaining about that because the money is not coming largely for if if the money was largely coming from the Russians, the EU and the Speaker 2: US State Department would be demanding this. We have this Speaker 0: in The United States. It's called a FARA registration, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. We consider that to be a criminal violation where you can spend five years in jail if you don't file a foreign registration. But if Hungary or Serbia or Slovakia tries to pass a a foreign agent registrations act law there, we call that an attack on democracy. Why? Because it reveals it takes the mask off of the angio plex and and and reflects and shows to the people what it really is. It is the long arm of US Intelligence. It is the long arm of US statecraft, and is the long arm of that corporate financial donor drafter class with all of their own secular private Speaker 1: If I could just interject and say, you know, what I find so infuriating is that none of this helps the America that I live in or want to live in. I mean, lot of the agenda is being pushed, not just like, you know, we want to grow our bananas in your banana favorable climate, or we want cheaper coffee, or, you know, we want your oil fields. It's like pushing stuff that is just terrible, like, awful. Like, blowing up families, attacking Christianity. It's like, why does it have to be that too? Why that agenda? Speaker 0: This is what where it gets really complicated. The idea behind this positive synergy between the corporate sponsored NGOs and the government sponsored NGOs and them all working together as a common blob was that if the if we secure American business in a country, American contracts, American rights to minerals or American rights to mines, we're boxing out the Russians and the Chinese. Speaker 1: I get it. That's not a crazy goal. Speaker 0: It's a crazy goal. It's it's and that, however, gives a license to some of the dirtiest stuff. And and this total profiteering, especially because the multinational corporations have no We're still living in Milton Friedman land, and this is something Milton Friedman was a huge influence on me as a kid. Huge, huge, huge. I watched Speaker 1: Yeah, me too. Speaker 0: All ten hours of Free to Choose. I think he's an incredibly I think he's a high integrity guy, and he means what he says, but I think he fooled a lot of conservatives with this concept of maximizing total shareholder value, which is now codified effectively, you know, into into our corporate law that you have a It's the law. It's the law. You have a statutory you have a duty Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: To maximize total shareholder value. That does not mean value for Americans. When your markets are abroad, and your labor is abroad, and your factories are abroad, but you are getting billions of dollars from the US government to advance your own private interests, and you are toppling many solid parts of the world order to do so. You're overthrowing governments. You're bribing media. You're controlling organized crime groups, and conflict zones, and the narco trafficking, all of the dirty work that goes into making the sausage in a lot of these countries. It's not trickling down, you know, per Ronald Reagan to the people that live there. These companies all got extremely rich while the heartland turned into the Rust Belt. That's right. And, you know, so to me, it's no surprise when you see that John Bolton on Piers Morgan held up his USAID hand grenade when he was the head of USAID policy and budget under Ronald Reagan. He showed this a few months ago on on Piers Morgan that his parting gift from USAID after he left running the policy and budget there, John Bolton, humanitarian assistance guy, was a was a USAID hand grenade. That's that was the parting gift they gave him, a golden hand grenade with with his name engraved in it. But that that is Speaker 1: And and what did that imply? That he was trying to blow up USAID, or that he was that they're in fact using Speaker 0: I think the the idea was that, you know, they are hard charging about it, think. But you know, what it represents to me is this development defense, you know, they call it the three d's. The develop diplomacy, defense, development. The idea that USAID is absolutely critical to US military operations. It's absolutely critical to US diplomatic operations. It's absolutely critical to US intelligence operations, which supports the diplomacy and defense. And so, you know, while you're masquerading as this humanitarian NGO sponsor, you're the embodiment of the hand grenade. And and that to me, you know, that's a that's a Reaganite philosophy that we're fighting the ghost of. This idea that to that you deserve a slot within this government apparatus, US government apparatus, when you are not representing the interests of The United States, or at least you there are no conditions on it. There's there's no bounds on it, other than you need to be in the good graces of that government. For example, the US embassy in Brasilia did nothing to stop Brazil's attack on X or Brazil's seizure of assets Exactly. Speaker 1: That's exactly right. Speaker 0: But this goes this goes back a really long time. I mean Speaker 1: Gonzaloleer is a US citizen, was murdered by the Ukrainian government, and, like, nobody said a word about it. The US Ambassador to Ukraine didn't say a word. None of the million NGOs populated by Americans in Ukraine said a word. Like, I I don't see how they're on the side of America at all. Speaker 0: Right. Right. Well, the source example is really interesting. Can I share a few anecdotes? Speaker 1: Gosh, I hope you will. Speaker 0: So when I went into the WikiLeaks archive to to look at all the State Department cables that referenced George Soros, or the Open Society Foundation, or any of its associated groups, the Open Society Institution, the Open Society Forum, I was surprised when I saw the communications in the State Department cables start in 1973, because the Open Society Foundation did not start until 1979. And when I looked at at the State Department cables, they were all related to Soros Associates, which was the the firm operated by George Soros's older brother, Paul Soros, who is, you know, according to his New York Times obituary, you know, one of the greatest titans of the ship shipping and port and infrastructure development world. And Paul Soros is all over these State Department cables in tons of countries, Gabon, Iran, remember this is pre 1970, this is, you know Speaker 1: Pre revolution, yeah. Speaker 0: Right. And so the State Department is is Oregon is working with Soros Associates, Paul Soros, in order to secure contracts for him, in order to secure favorable loan terms to foreign governments, and in order to intervene on the bidding process for port construction for lucrative port deals. Think one in Gabon was I think a I think it was like a 700,000,000 to a billion dollar port project. You know, huge money for Gabon, a project in Gabon in early nineteen seventies. And one of one of these cable State Department cables is really interesting. It's the US embassy there, and they are talking about how three senior executives from Brown and Root are going to be coming to Gabon that week, and are looking to have arrangements made to meet with, I think, the president of the country and other influential leaders in government and in civil society, and for the embassy to arrange everything from their travel to their hotel, to to introducing them to all the senior leaders in the country. And Brown and Root was working together with and on this port project, and they were bidding against other foreign, you know, infrastructure development companies from from other countries. And one of the cables basically suggests that, you know, that the embassy should relay back to Soros and and Brown and Root the the status of the bid going to them, and anything favorable that can be done to to nudge that contract going to Brown and Root and Soros. Now what's interesting about this is a few things. So this is the example of what what you were talking about, which is we're doing this because we want to stop, you know, there's a big fight over Africa with the Russians, and with the Chinese all throughout the Cold War. You know, a lot of Africa had sided with Russia, and the Russian communism was seen as an egalitarian counterweight to a sort of racist United States, and there was a big diplomacy push there. So getting Brown and Root and Soros to control the infrastructure in the country and to get those contracts and to get the proceeds and remits was advancing US interests under US national security and US national interests, which means there's a state department interest in doing favors for Soros and Brownenroot. Now Brownenroot, which would later become Halliburton, or Brownenroot is, I guess, Halliburton, I guess, acquired Brown Root. Speaker 1: Kellogg Brown and Root. Speaker 0: Yes. Right. Which of course is, you know, Dick Cheney was the, I think CEO and president. And Brown and Root in the JFK files, it was very interesting. The ones that were declassified just a few months ago by Tulsi Gabbard, they have a whole section on the CIAs, all the CIA influence nodes over over Brown and Root, and it was fascinating. I believe both Brown senior and junior held covert security clearances with the Central Intelligence Agency. There's a memo in these new unredacted JFK files, and it was a CIA internal fact check, a crisis communications, how do we respond to this new piece in Ramparts magazine called this called Brown and Roots CIA Dimensions. And you know, so this is the Houston Republican power, CIA power base. This has been the big power base of the Republican party for almost a hundred years now. This this oil Yeah. Giant oil Oil zone. Yes. Exactly. Speaker 1: So no matter how you feel about Donald Trump, it's hard to deny that his second term has been a whirlwind. It's amazing how fast this administration is advancing its agenda, putting illegal aliens, slashing government waste, an entirely new trade strategy. No one has ever seen anything like it. They are not messing around. Now many people are thrilled by this fast start, but it's gonna take a lot more than this to achieve the ultimate goal. And that's why our friends at the Heritage Foundation are mobilizing supporters, patriots across the country to support this administration and the broader conservative movement, and they need your help to do that. You can go to Heritage.org/survey to complete their national survey on Donald Trump's second term agenda. What you tell them will help their team work with the White House to make the president's campaign promises a reality. I used to work at Heritage thirty five years ago. Gave me my first job. I've always been grateful for that. Heritage is not like every other think tank in DC, almost all of which are part of the problem. Heritage is fighting the problem. I can say that. Go to heritage.org/survey to help them fill out the survey. Heritage.org/survey. Speaker 0: And so Ramparts writes this piece, and it accuses this, the CI of running this vast network through the petroleum industry, and through a web of NGOs, and trade associations all over Houston, and and it focuses on this Brown and Root network, because Brown and Root also had something called the Brown found the Brown Foundation, which was a n g, you know, a corporate sponsored NGO. And in this, they actually reveal that both Brown senior and Brown junior had covert security clearances for work with the Central Intelligence Agency. So while you have, you know, one of the world's premier infrastructure and development firms, which would later, you know, be going to work, you know, with Soros in Africa, and then would later spawn vice president Dick Cheney, and Liz Cheney who started off her career in USAID and comes from that same, you know, Halliburton Brown and Root lineage. They've direct ties all over the CIA. And I guess I bring this up to say that in addition to that, you had this web of of adjacent NGOs around around statecraft there. So for example, in that same files, again, the CIA is doing an internal fact check-in this in this memo, where they say Ramparts is accused of these people of being CIA. And it's it's a memo, think, the one of the local directors saying, are are here's here's we reviewed the files. Here's what's true and false about the Ramparts article. In one of these, they describe something called the Vernon Fund, which was a private philanthropy. Well, it was created by the Central Intelligence Agency to look to the public like a private foundation. And it was set up to fund the webs of teachers unions all throughout the world. They sponsor something called the World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession. The CIA was running a initiative at the time to control the education space during the Cold War to stop the spread of communist teachings, communist sympathizing teachings and curricula, especially in cold war conflict zones all over Europe, all over Africa, all over Latin America. And so to do that, to control, to make sure that students and young people and every person in society who comes up through the education system is ideologically aligned against communism. They had to control the teachers' unions and what was being taught, what was being promoted. And I bring this up. Again, I hate communism, but all of this was repurposed against right wing populism when Trump won in 2016. I noticed. Because instead of this same blob being threatened from its communist socialist left, it was being threatened from its populist nationalist right. But so the CIA so in this memo, the CIA says, yeah, they're right about the Vernon Fund. Ramparts is right. That was ours. We set it up to look like a private philanthropy. We recruited the daughter of the Texas governor to bundle money to the World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession in order to influence the National Education Association, and create, I think it was like 140 different trade associations that they all worked through. Now the National Education Association is the largest of of the the teaching union associations, and the World Confederation of Organizations for the Teaching Profession is still around today. It's called Education International. They rebranded the name, but it's the same organization. And by the way, in these CIA files, they explicitly say the president of the World Confederation of Organizations, the teaching profession, is has a CIA covert clearance to do this work. The the treasurer, the executive secretary. So the thing is funded by the CIA, by a NGO that was actually created by the CIA. The senior leadership of the trade association doing the work are are CIA at every part of the layer. But how many people in Education International, how many teachers in that union you think know that story? How many fifth grade teachers? How many, you know, administrators at the union level? How many people in the schools know that? So when you see Education International today come out in Germany, because it branches in every country. In Germany, Education International has come out and said, AFD, no one affiliated with AFD should be allowed to be a teacher in Germany. And and and they petitioned the German government to not allow AFD at any of the Speaker 1: You can't have a job if you vote for the party. Speaker 0: Right. But this is exactly what RCI has been calling for, because AFD has been trying to revive the Nord Stream pipeline and trying to restore relations with Russia. So from the national security, you know, side of this, there's a predicate to say, yeah. We're authorized to run this operation. But but what do you do there? Now you've got the AFT, which is the most popular party in Germany right now in polling. It's got, I think, 26%. They they doubled their their votes in the in the recent election, but since then, polling shows that they are now the most popular party in Germany. They were declared an extremist organization by their own national security state, which is effectively our national security state. We gave birth to Germany as a unified country in the nineteen nineties and midwifed its entire intelligence apparatus. The center of US intelligence in the Cold War was in Germany. And so you have this this blob interest in banning AFD. The the German government declares the most popular party in the country an extremist group. If the definition of extreme is that it is a departure from what's popular. Speaker 2: And so by its very definition, it's it's a Speaker 0: contradiction is what I'm Of getting at there. But that and thank God for Marco Rubio and senator and senator Tom Cotton, to his credit, was fantastic on this. He, you know, directing he and Tulsi Gabbard he, I think, directed Tulsi Gabbard at ODNI to threaten to not to discontinue intelligence sharing with German intelligence for this domestic surveillance, because this extremist label allowed the German government to spy on every member of the AFD as if they were Al Qaeda. And so because of US diplomatic pressure from our state department, our ODNI, our congress, Germany has temporarily put that in the enforcement of their surveillance dimension on pause. But what I'm getting at is this is this is a CI proprietary Education International who's doing active work to do exactly what the Bill Burns CIA, the John Brennan CIA wants done in Germany. And of course, who was The US Ambassador to Germ to Germany while this all played out with the Nord Stream pipeline blowing up? It was Amy Gutman, my dean at the University of Pennsylvania. You know, Amy Gutman, when I when I was there twenty years ago, she was the dean then, then she became The US Ambassador to Germany, head the state department in Germany during the Biden administration. And meanwhile, what's the University of Pennsylvania doing? It's housing the Penn Biden Center, which is this major foreign policy coordinating node at the university layer. Again, are just super NGOs. The universities will organize the international exchanges of ideas with civil society in all these foreign countries. They will produce the white papers that get picked up by the media. They will liaise with meet with government officials to advise on economic policy, don't you know, in the region. You know, this is the whole Jeffrey Sachs, Harvard Institute of International Development. Speaker 1: And it's all tax free. That's that's the part that I mean, I because you began this history of the NGO, and thank you for doing it, with reference to the tax code, the introduction of the income tax in 1913, and then the tax exempt statutes of 1917, right in the middle of first world war, not surprisingly. But, like, isn't the whole idea of it, my understanding of a five zero one c three well, I know because I ran one. The idea is that this helps America. Mhmm. We're encouraging charity. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But you're describing that are arms of the Intel community or, you know, working to increase profit to American businesses that may not actually really be American. A publicly traded company is not American. It's owned by the sovereign wealth funds of nine different you know, it's like Right. The whole thing is fake. So what in 2025 is the justification for continuing to subsidize these? Because, I mean, a tax exemption is a a subsidy. Right. In fact, someone's gotta run the government. Someone's gotta fund the patent office. If it's not you, it's going to be me. So but why should we subsidize these things? Speaker 0: They give three reasons. National security, national interest, and securing export markets. And you know, the idea is is what does America look like if we don't do this? We're in a competition right now with Huawei in the the telecom space, in the IT infrastructure space. Major state department initiatives to try to get neutral third party governments to do away with Huawei, and sign up with AT and T, or if not that, other kind of five gs light providers like like LG and Nokia Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: In in Finland and South Korea to so that at least it's not China Huawei. And there's lots of reasons given for this, But the idea is is if you can if you can get AT and T to get those contracts, well, AT and is an American company, and this will help American GDP, and this will help American And so, like a great example, this is what just happened in Syria. So there's been this big fight over this this group, the well, also, Syria has we we just lifted sanctions on Syria. Speaker 1: Yes. Last month. Speaker 0: Yes. Mohammed al Jelani, the ISIS commander turned Al Qaeda commander turned Idlib, you know, rebel moderate rebel leader, you know, who who became, you know, the de facto head of state in Syria. Speaker 1: Now meeting with the US President? Speaker 0: Yes. Meeting yes. Meeting with the US President, meeting with every every major world leader. The US just declared that we're lifting sanctions on on Syria after Syria pledged to open up its to basically use US and Western companies and contractors for its services rather than Russian or Chinese ones. So for example, one of the pledges was to use AT and T for its wireless and telecom services rather than Huawei. Speaker 1: Where are they going buy their pagers? Speaker 0: A question. Speaker 1: It's and, yeah, it goes without saying that when, you know, the State Department lobbies to allow AT and T to do your your wireless infrastructure that, you know, that we're monitoring it, of course. Speaker 0: Right. But you can see how like what would America look like if AT and T's now there's I think what, 25,000,000 people or so in in Syria. So AT and T has just secured 25,000,000 customers effectively at the at the, you know, barrel of a gun effectively with the they've drafted off of the US Defense Department who funded Yep. The paramilitaries in Syria. They've drafted off of USAID and the billions we funneled into Syria. They've drafted off of State Department diplomacy on their behalf. And you know, a great example of this is Speaker 1: Let me just say, I mean, well, I definitely don't think that the ISIS guy is in any real sense better than Bashar al Assad, you know, the ophthalmologist. That's just my opinion. I don't think that we should be friends with the ISIS guy or the Al Qaeda guy after they murdered 3,000 Americans. Like, I don't understand that. Or I do understand it, but it has nothing to do with The United States. So that bothers me. On the other hand, since we are doing that, I think it's great that AT and T is getting the contract. I don't have a problem with And it what you're describing is a pretty conventional process where the US State Department, White House, and DOD all kind of combined forces to help American business abroad. Great. In general, great. I don't like the constellation, the mushy constellation of, quote, nonprofits that operate in a very shadowy way. Like, why do we need them for this? Speaker 0: Well, let's stick with the Syria example for a second. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And go over one of the shadiest of the nonprofits, which is the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace. Speaker 1: By the way, if you fly into DC, into National Airport, Reagan National Airport, which is like the closest airport to any city in America, but it's right there, right across the river, and you come in from the North, you fly directly over the US Institute of Peace, and it's a kind of clamshell it's a beautiful building. Beautiful. It's a modern building. What's with probably the only pretty modern building in Washington, and you think to yourself, what the hell is that, and where'd they get the money? What is that? Speaker 0: Well, international peace is a funny piece, and international peace has a funny history with US intelligence work. In the JFK files, for example, in the recent declassifications, it showed a group that the CIA infiltrated and directed called the Catholic Association of International Peace, and there are all these files that show that, yes, we we have our assets in here, and they're doing this for this. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, not the Catholic Association for International Peace, but a second international peace, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was run from 2014 to 2021 by Bill Burns. The guy who would leave Carnegie Endowment for International Peace to run the Central Intelligence Agency. What qualifies you as running the Endowment for International Peace as your very next job? You hadn't worked in government for seven years. You were cold. What were you he and he had never worked at the CIA formally. He was in the political affairs section, which according to the JFK files, 47% of every person in the in the political affairs section in 1961 was not actually working in the State Department political section. They were actually called Confidential American Sources, which is the term for CIA agents operating under diplomatic cover, saying they work for the State That's Speaker 1: still the case today. It's a joke in DC. What's your dad do? Oh, he works at the State Department. Oh, okay. Speaker 0: Yeah. People say that about me. Yeah. Speaker 1: And I Speaker 0: don't blame him for for thinking it. I mean, it's it's so pervasive, and of course, who was the head of political affairs for the Biden administration? Victoria Nuland. Yeah. You know, and who would then go on to, be on the board of the National Dialogue for Democracy, which is another group that was spun out in 1983 by the Reagan administration when they were trying to get the CIA's old powers back, but the Democrats in Congress were blocking that because of the CIA's work against the anti war faction in the Democrat party during the sixties and seventies. So in 1983 Reagan creates NED, nineteen eighty four they create the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace has had this crazy showdown with the US federal government recently, and it's an unbelievable drama that's been unfolding now for several months. So the US Institute of Peace was, you know, was chartered by Congress in 1984 in order to do it was sort of a think of it like the National Endowment for Democracy, but but more Is George Speaker 1: Orwell in charge of naming these groups? I mean, National Endowment for Democracy subverts democracy. You know, all these peace groups are, like, aggressively anti peace. So one of the easiest decisions you're gonna make this week is to make your home secure with SimpliSafe. The moment you arm your system, your family, and everything you work for is protected, and you can focus on what matters. You can leave the house without worrying that someone is going to break in and steal your stuff, violate your sanctuary, because the best security system in the country is watching. Millions of Americans use SimpliSafe and enjoy the peace of mind it creates. Now a traditional burglar alarm only goes off when someone breaks into your house. That's not good enough. Smashed a window was already in your basement. SimpliSafe prevents burglaries before they happen. It's got AI powered cameras and live professional monitoring agents, so it leaves nothing to chance. Plans start at about a dollar per day, plus a sixty day satisfaction guarantee, or you get your money back. Check it out at simplysafe.com/tucker. Go to simplysafe.com/tucker to get 50% off a new system with professional monitoring and your first month free. That's simplisafe.com/tucker. There is no safe like SimpliSafe. Speaker 0: Well, you know, the quote by the National Endowment for Democracy founder, I believe in 1986 in the New York Times, was that it was it would be terrible for groups to be seen as subsidized by the Central Intelligence Agency. We saw that happen in the 1960s, where it was revealed groups were funded by the CIA, and it caused embarrassment. That's why the endowment was created. It's literally a direct quote, saying that the endowment was created to fund the groups, that it would embarrassing for them to, for it to be publicly revealed that they got CIA funding. And of course, it was conceived in the office of Reagan's CIA, William Casey, and Raymond Green. There's a whole CIA backstory to the whole Ned thing, but in 1984, another layer of Gongo, you know. So the US Institute of Peace was set up to be to be a national down for democracy, but really focused on conflict zones, those whereas national down for democracy operates everywhere. They'll operate in, you know, very heavily in Hungary, or Brazil. Places where there's not real dark, you know, terrorist conflict, or hyperactive DOD operations, for example. So they, in those places, it's a different track of influence for the NGOs, because they're working with these communities in these. They're working with the farmers where the the coca leaves or cocaine are being grown. They're working, you they're they're working you mentioned coffee. USAID has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the coffee trade sector, and USAID does all this joint work with Starbucks, all this joint work with Keurig. They operate in conflict zones, in the drug zones in Colombia, in Peru, the Central African Republic, Sudan. And what they're doing here is, sorry, they're well, I I got distracted by the coffee thought. Sorry. What the US Institute of Peace is doing is they're building giant networks, and serving as a back channel diplomacy. They're doing fieldwork. So they are you know, if you're in Foggy Bottom or Langley, Virginia, if you wanna know what's happening on the ground in Syria, you need the people in the field to report it to you. You need either the US embassy or you need the NGOs connected to the embassy to provide the fieldwork. We wanna know what is happening economically in this region, which is the economic, you know, breadbasket that's supporting The US military operations or the mercenary troops so that we can keep them funded. We wanna keep the industry in Afghanistan going. The industry in Syria in these sections. So the US Institute of Peace will do those surveys. They'll work with the local populations. They'll build giant networks. And you know, in June 2023, the US Institute of Peace, after the Taliban took over Afghanistan, they wrote a piece called, Why the Taliban's Successful Opium Ban is bad for Afghanistan and bad for the world. And they openly called on the Taliban. Speaker 1: We're not getting enough opium. Yes. Mike, it's a problem. Speaker 0: Right. But the opium was funding the entire paramilitary network in Syria. You know, everyone says, oh, ISIS traffics and drugs. Al Qaeda traffics and drugs. Well, guess what? ISIS and Al Qaeda with the with the full backing of the Biden government just successfully overthrew the Biden administration's top enemy in the region and now have opened up all their markets to Chevron and AT and T. And what I'm saying is is they were openly this same group that is working with these Taliban networks and these Afghan special forces, and is deeply, deeply involved in Syria is openly calling, and and this is not that they got busted paying these Taliban officials when when Trump tried to assert control over The US ensued peace, because it's chartered by Congress. It has 15 members of its board. Three of them are mandatory. The secretary of state, the secretary of defense, and the president of the National Defense University are three reserved spots. So think about this. This is the US Institute of Peace, but required on the board is the secretary of war, the the head of the the War Institute, and the secretary of state. And then there are 12 political appointee spots. Now the Trump administration tried to assert control over the US Institute of Peace as it is statutorily entitled to do, and the response from the US Institute of Peace was to barricade the doors to delete, Doge said, a terabyte worth of financial data, which Doge says it recovered and showed payments to those very Taliban networks that they were saying, keep the drugs flowing. And so evidently, according to to the Doge team, they found weapons caches inside, like a like a full military, you Speaker 1: know They found weapons inside the Institute of Peace? Speaker 0: That was what Doge reported as they said Speaker 1: Well, back to Orwell now. Right. Right. The peace people are stockpiling weapons. Speaker 0: But recently, so this has gone through the courts because, you know, the whole blob resistance has been trying to stop all these shutdowns at every layer. The outside general counsel for the US Institute of Peace has he has been the the outside general counsel for since 1986, just two years. So he so the guy in in who's the head lawyer there has been the head lawyer there since just two years after it was founded, since the since the mid nineteen eighties. So has been, you know, midwifing the the legal dark dark arts of this thing since almost the day it was born. And he's the one who I believe has spearheaded or been leading this this lawsuit to stop the the federal government's because the because the Trump administration cleared the board. The US Institute Peace would not even allow the Trump appointed board members, or its president, to even go in the building. That's why the federal police had to the FBI had to come in and in but what happened was is that same lawyer also happens to represent the Wireless Trade Association in in The US, AT And T and that whole network. So while they are working for regime change in Syria, while the US Institute of Peace is taking US taxpayer money, 55,000,000 a year, to build up this network of paramilitary groups and, you know, all these economic assistance programs and midwifing the political negotiations of and creating a unified cohesive block against the the Assad government in Syria with US US and Sud peace funds, the same lawyer who's who's now successfully sued because judge Beryl Howe blocked the Trump administration's attempt now. Now we're back to square one with that. He simultaneously is representing the wireless trade association where Syria just, you know, turned over its IT infrastructure to AT and T. So I mean, just think about that. You've got you've got the US Institute of Peace organizing this regime change in Syria, including using, you know, these narco traffic drugs while calling for the narco networks to keep going. And simultaneously, the, you know, the senior executives effectively I know he's senior he's out top outside counsel, but the senior executives effectively are representing the companies that are the direct beneficiaries of this regime change action. So it doesn't matter if it's good for US national security or US national interest to to topple Bashar al Assad, because they have a fundamentally unique and singular benefit, whether it's good for us or not, which is that they get rich from it. Speaker 1: I remember reading about the fascists, and one of the one of the criticisms that I thought really resonated was they eliminated the difference between the state, and, you know, they were they were socialists, truly, and in Germany and in Italy, and there was was you couldn't tell where the German government ended and Krupp's began, and you know what I mean? And that's bad. Yes. I thought it was bad then, I think it's bad now, and I hate to see it happen here. Speaker 0: Well, it's funny you say that, because last week at the Council on Foreign Relations, I think the panel was titled Reflections on the Post Soviet Era and Implications for the Modern Day. It's Council on Foreign Relations. And one of the questions asked the panelists directly was, there was a deep state in Russia in the nineteen nineties, these oligarchs. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And we lost control over Russia. They're basically analogizing Trump to Putin, and they're saying, we had we had all this control. We had total control over Russia during the Boris Yeltsin period, and we had all these relationships with the Russian oligarchs. But then Putin had a natural advantage as being the head of state, was somehow able to take over the Russian deep state, and then we lost control over Russia. Speaker 1: This is right. This is like the heart of it that nobody ever says. It's Putin's decision to decapitate the oligarchy. That's the reason they hate him. Speaker 0: Well, what they say is that he also co opted it and got the oligarchy working for him rather than for Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 0: Outside. Speaker 1: And in the meantime, the Russian economy recovered and life expectancy went up and alcoholism went down and, like, it became a beautiful country. The oligarchy wasn't serving Russia. That's kind of the point. Speaker 0: Well, the and the punchline to this is at the end of setting this question up, the the guy at Council of Foreign Relations asked, so with those lessons given that that's what happened with Putin, how can we preserve the deep state against Trump to save so that the deep state can save us? Is sick. And Speaker 1: This is sick. Speaker 0: But again, look at, like, you know, Chubay's and the Russian oligarchs that were working directly with the with USAID Oh, yeah. And the Harvard Institute for International Development, and it's the same thing with with Brown Root, that story of Brown and Root and Soros in in Gabon in the nineteen seventies. It was the same thing in Russia there where where we justified because it was in US national security and and national interest to make Russia a democracy and to privatize all their state owned assets. USAID paid a half a billion dollars to the Harvard Institute for International Development. Again, another one of these universities that's delegated by the US government to go deeper into Russian society than the US government was wanted to be seen doing. Very clever name. Right? US Agency for International Development pays the Harvard Institute for International Development. It's just a Harvard spawn of USAID. In order to work with Tubei's and all these, you know, Russian oligarchs, so that the Russian oligarchs got rich selling at discount bargain basement prices, all these Russian state held assets Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: In noncompetitive bids where only two outside bidders were allowed to participate. The Harvard Management Fund for the Harvard Endowment and the George Soros Quantum Fund. Speaker 1: So it's just looting. It's looting. And by the way, it it really the country I mean, look at the numbers. Like, the life expectancy for men in Russia in, you know, 1996 was, like, 55. I mean, it was it was awful awful to do that to people. Like, what did your average Russian do wrong? You know, they lived through seventy years of communism, and this is what you do to them once they're quote liberated. It's like, it's really a moral crime. Speaker 0: And and part of that issue is is Mhmm. As they were driving our own country on a similar path Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: They expressed the exact same contempt that someone would try to do something to stop it. And the other thing is is they fully acknowledged it was a deep state before Putin. They were just mad that they lost control of the deep state, which is why they were so why a lot of these actions by the the early Trump administration have terrified them around co opting parts of the business community. Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: They hate, for example, Elon Musk. They made this whole campaign to drive Elon, you know, away, or to go after Tesla. They the reaction to Jeff Bezos, for example, and, you know, his posture around reorienting the Washington Post and sort of the Bill Crystal class was apoplectic that these commercial drivers in the sort of business community, but really these are this is the the private for profit sector that they would go along with Trump's foreign policy agenda, with Trump's reforms, maybe to be in Trump's good graces, but the fact is is that that state, which was such a powerful asset to them, they do not want that handed off to somebody who might oppose them. The same reason that they didn't want Matt Gaetz at the Justice Department. They weaponized that Justice Department under Merrick Garland. They don't want that baton handed off to someone else. It's not that they have a problem with corruption at the Justice Department. They want a monopoly on that corruption. Speaker 1: So you're describing the mobilization of, you know, all the various arms of the US government, but the NGO community against Russia, and I thought you made a really, really wise observation that too few make that Putin's original sin wasn't really lusting after Poland. That's a lie. It was kicking out the oligarchs and taking control of his own country, which a lot of people hated in the West. So here's the part where I feel like the NGOs destabilized The United States. Like, the war against Russia has been waged for over ten years now, really by the NGOs. Speaker 0: Yes. Completely. And they were, you know, as we discussed, they authorized, deputized to do that. We talked about the Harvard, the Harvard Endowment, the Harvard Institute for International Development by the Open Society Foundation, which was simultaneously doing its civil society work, funding scientists, funding universities, funding the intellectual class, funding the students, and then simultaneously Soros is operating a hedge fund that is buying up the assets of the Russian government. Speaker 1: And, you know So believable. Of the failed Soviet state. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. And this relationship is I mentioned to you just now that there's a funny story about Soros in Mongolia, and the State Department in Mongolia that is like almost the the perfect encapsulation of this to to see how this plays out in every country, whether whether it's Russia, or whether it's Poland, or whether it's Hungary, or you name it. But Mongolia had discovered in the early two thousands the world's largest copper mine. It's called the Uyo Tuigal Mine. And this was by far the biggest mine ever discovered in Mongolia. It was the biggest mine in the world, primarily copper, some gold too. And a company called Ivanhoe went into negotiate a deal for the rights over that mine in tandem with Mongolian government. And the The US so I found this in a State Department cable looking up all the Soros and Open Society Foundation things, because I believe the cable is from 02/2007. And it describes how this deal is it could yield billions of billions of dollars, and would could massively transform the entire Mongolian Mongolian economy. It could like double their entire GDP with a single mine. And how there was an interest in making sure that this mine was acquired by Western companies rather than Chinese or Russians. And in the context of this, the State Department references the in the open a pivotal Open Society Foundation Mongolia memo that had caught fire in the Mongolian press, and was weighing heavily on public conversation about whether or not the Mongolian government would sign this deal with with Ivanhoe, with with this with the with the company for this. And the Soros Foundation writes, and the State Department backs this in this cable. They basically say, yes, this is all correct. We should be done to slow the Basically, the Mongolian government wanted deal terms and was about to pass something hastily in parliament to secure a deal that the Open Society Foundation said was too extractive on behalf of the Mongolian government. That basically, the the Mongolian government had problems with corruption. They also mentioned that the deal might have environmental impact in terms of the the the mine and and its environmental impact on the ecosystem of Mongolia. And they they give seven reasons in this memo that that the Mongolian parliament should not has to be stopped from from doing this this deal on these terms. So this is a Speaker 1: Can I ask, the mine is in Mongolia? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It's in Mongolia. Speaker 1: And the Mongolian parliament is the Mongolian government. So George Soros, who's from Hungary but has British and American citizenship, is telling the Mongolians they shouldn't be able to do what they want with their own mine. Speaker 0: Maybe I'll start with the punchline first to make it way more I Speaker 1: mean, it's so. The presumption there is a bit much. Speaker 0: The punchline is in 02/2009, George Soros the George Soros Management Fund purchased an absolutely huge stake in that very company. Speaker 1: Come on. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. It changed its name to Rio Tinto, but it was called Ivanhoe while it was negotiating this this deal. Now, the Open Society Foundation, they published an 174 page document, which went through everything they did inside of Mongolia to kill the the to kill the deal in 02/2007. And what they described is that they networked with all these Mongolian members of parliament. They used their media NGO, their, you know, their their nonprofit organizations, advocacy groups, their their their environmental NGOs to argue that the deal should be killed on environmental grounds. And this culminated in sort the Soros Foundation takes credit for its spawning street protests that destabilize the Mongolian government and incentivize parliament the parliament to not not ink this deal. And again, the Soros Foundation logic was that it was too extractive on the part of the Mongolian government. The Mongolian government was getting too good a deal Yeah. From this. On their Speaker 1: own mind. Mhmm. In their country. Speaker 0: Yes. In their country. And George Soros Speaker 1: didn't own enough of it. Speaker 0: So so the US embassy in Mongolia is working with the Soros network. Now they're doing it on national interest, national security grounds. They're saying, hey, if a western company doesn't get this, China's right next door to Mongolia. They're big in the minerals, the metal space. We don't want to lose this mine, the biggest copper mine in the world to a Chinese competitor. We want to make sure our westerner gets this deal. But the Open Society Foundation, which is underneath the now it's the nonprofit side of the Soros Management Fund. The Open Society Foundation is saying, hey, Kill this deal because the company is not getting enough money out of this. Speaker 2: And then as soon as they kill that and get more profit secured for the the mining company, the Soros management fund buys up the equity way before everybody else. You can read about this in Speaker 0: in the This is that no matter what happened with the mine, he he would have, like, doubled his profit. I think it went from 9¢ to 17¢ before a deal was even inked or be before they even got to one of the development stages of it, simply because everybody else hearing the news about this rushed into it. But Soros had already bought up the stock because his own NGOs were on the ground midwifing the entire process with the full force and credit of the US government driving. Speaker 1: This is gonna happen in Ukraine, isn't it? Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sure it's happened all the Speaker 1: rebuilt the Ukraine Rebuilding Fund from BlackRock. I mean, this is so if I want a piece of the trillion dollars that's gonna be spent to make Ukraine a country again and to, you know, and and a piece of its resources, which are substantial, then I'm probably gonna use NGOs on my behalf. Right? Speaker 0: Yes. And this is where you get this curious line around Gongos, government organized NGOs, and Ongos, I guess, you know, these oligarch organized NGOs, and where they all sort of meet in the middle. And where they meet in the middle is I guess what we just call politics. The the topography of political factions in The US. In the sense that every major company has an interest in sponsoring NGOs that regardless of whether they believe in the mission of it, they advance something that helps that the business side of this. So I mentioned Brown and Root had the Brown Foundation. And the, you know, the Soros Management Fund has the Open Society Foundation. And you know, Microsoft has the, you know, the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. No. But the last one was was a little bit tongue in cheek. But what what I'm getting at here is, like, take the example of this Mongolia mine. They the Soros didn't care about the environmental impact of that Mongolia mine. The fact that they could astroturf environmental protesters to take to the streets and to create a human rights predicate as to why the international community should intervene to stop the Mongolian government from signing this deal. Ugh. Was simply an NGO work. It was simply an. Now if the US government did that, that would have to come straight from the CI. That's gonna be a covert action if you're going to run through Speaker 1: Oh, exactly. Speaker 0: Front groups. But if you have an ostensibly public one, but you're not seeing the classified state department cables or whatever's CI underneath that making an argument from their Asia Desk. Well, this is going to help US national security because that's less minerals for China. But then Soros is using that money and sponsoring Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. So the real fear though is that that could happen inside our borders. Yes. That this combination of, you know, government actors, strict strict government actors from the executive branch agencies and NGOs collude to like take down a president. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's exactly Speaker 1: they Well, that's correct. Right? So they staged a little Mongolia right here in The US. Speaker 0: Yes. And they're all the same groups. They're all the same groups. And a great example of this, we are talking about the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace, we we talked about it in the context of Syria Yeah. And how they were openly funding the Taliban, and lobbying the Taliban to keep 95% of the world's opium flowing after the Taliban took over. Speaker 1: You know how high heroin prices would go if they shut that down? I mean, see their point. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. Good point. Yeah. More for the rest of Speaker 1: it. Unbelievable. Speaker 0: They so so they are involved in these astroturf NGO rent to riots very heavily. If you go to the publications page Speaker 1: The Institute of Peace. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. US Institute of Peace. Now you have to understand, they have a term for this. Get ready for it. Nonviolent action. That's the term. Now if you have to say that you're nonviolent, you're Speaker 1: probably a little Speaker 2: bit you know, I'm not like non violently drinking this water right now. Speaker 1: No. No. You're not. Speaker 0: But you have to understand where this came. So this came from the same military network. We talked about how the origin point for this was 1948. UN declaration of human rights forbids military conquest, and mil territorial accession by military force. UN declaration of human rights the UN charter that 1948 establishes the NGO framework at the international level, intergovernmentally. 1948 is also when the the CIA inaugurates organized political warfare through the use of NGOs. But right at this time, you have sorry. One second. I just I had a second thought that just just crapped crapped up on this. We were talking about The US and Soups piece. So right at this time, you have this move from direct military force to topple governments through military coups, or through military takeovers, or through getting military defectors to serve a top down attempt to induce regime change. They created a blueprint. This is the famous color revolution blueprint, the people powered revolution, you know, lots of lots of names for this, which is which is the bottom up method. Which instead of getting at the military level with tanks and guns and fighter jets, you do it at the paramilitary street level. You shut down the country by getting a critical mass of its civil society organizations to not cooperate with that government. So the government can't bring any can't bring in any revenue. They can't pay their own police officers or members of the military to quell the riots because there's no money in the government coffers, because they'll be sanctioned by the international community for cracking down on the protesters, and because the country itself is not the hospital workers have walked out. The the public health industry workers have have walked out. So even the schools aren't open. The hospitals aren't open. The roads are being blockaded. The only way to get rid of these people is either with hundreds of thousands of police officers in every region to drag them or to kill them, in which case you have the human rights violations, and then every person is kicked off the SWIFT system, and the international finance system, and sanctions, and threats of, know, threats of a military intervention at that point. So this was pioneered by the US military. This paramilitary street technique that they call nonviolent action. And this was done through through Gene Sharp at the and his cohorts. It was at the Harvard CIA incidentally, the Harvard Center for International Affairs. It's a very cute, cute, cute nickname. But it was Henry Kissinger was there, recruited Gene Sharp. They got $50,000,000 in Pentagon funding to develop a the playbook that they now call from dictatorship to democracy. The idea that you can use mass NGO action to organize the unions, the trade workers, the laborers, the media organizations, the every aspect of civil society in order to encircle the government to cut it off from its own sources of power, and then with the with the sitting government effectively paraplegic quadriplegic, basically cut off from its arms and legs, it would be ousted by a street protest that effectively surrounds the capital and takes over takes over the buildings. I mean, is basically, it's a January 6 blueprint if what they said about January 6 was actually true, which of course is not. But you know, everyone can watch Bringing Down a Dictator, the PBS documentary about the State Department and US Institute of Peace. Their work getting the Oprah movement in Yugoslavia to topple Slobodan Milosevic. That was nonviolent action is what they call it. Now, the ending scene of that documentary, you hear the whole documentary. This is nonviolent action, nonviolent action. The climax of of the documentary, which has, you know, soaring violins as if this is this is an amazing, you know, amazing thing is the Parliament Building, you know, the capital building in in Serbia being being set on fire. Its windows smashed, and a throng of hundreds of thousands of angry street protesters flooding into the building and declaring themselves the new government. This is cheered on by the State Department, USAID, the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace was actually on the ground training them. And and meanwhile, the narrator, Martin Sheen is the narrator in this documentary, and he goes on to say, it's it's all about nonviolent action. It's it's and he says, and the that's outpour wears all black. They have they have tight leather. They have they have a clenched fist as their as their symbol. It is all intentionally sinister. You know? And it's like intentionally sinister, Molotov cocktails and police cars, setting the Capitol Building on fire, breaking the glass, forcing the the democratically elected president to flee by hell of ack out of the country. This is what they call nonviolent action. And just again, nonviolent action just means mob violence action. But to them, that is less violent than bombing Sarajevo for Speaker 1: do you understand? They're saying it's like it it's mostly peaceful. Speaker 0: Yes. Mostly peaceful arson, mostly peaceful. So so, I Speaker 1: mean, you're describing Black Lives Matter. Yes. It's kinda weird. I'm listening to this. I'm like, if Black Lives Matter was not a synthetic group, if it wasn't Astroturf, what happened to it? It disappeared as soon as its usefulness ended. Speaker 0: Well, that's that's exactly what happened. And I can talk all about the connections of this network to that, which is Speaker 1: But I mean, it's the same and I remember Darren Beatty saying at the very beginning of that, this is a color revolution, and I love and respect Darren, and I'm but I didn't quite fully appreciate how true that was. Speaker 0: No. It's literally the exact same network. I have all of Speaker 2: their planning documents from starting two weeks, Speaker 0: you know, after the riots popped off, we can get into that that whole thing with the transition integrity project, and the US Institute of Peace program on nonviolent action. Oh, incidentally, that's a Speaker 1: They were involved in that too? Speaker 0: Yes. And the International Center for Nonviolent Conflict was a big part of these, you know, how to leverage the BLM protests to shut the country down in case Trump won the twenty twenty election on election day twenty twenty. This is they also work through the union groups, especially the AFL CIO, which is the the top CIA conduit in the union space around the world. Leftists in the nineteen sixties used to call it the AFL CIA. Remember the AFL CIO had a secret agreement with the Chamber of Commerce about protests to shut down the country. This is published in Time Magazine by Molly Ball. But on this US Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Talk about the uni party. When labor and management are both colluding against you, you know. Right. But the The chamber of commerce. I mean, it really is everything is the final scene in animal farm when the pigs and the farmers are indistinguishable from each other. It's like that's the deep truth. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Both of them were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. The unions get hundreds of millions of dollars from the state department, from USAID. We have a whole we have multiple bureaus just for funding them. The Department of Labor is an international affairs bureau. We spent $20,000,000 funding unions in 2023 alone in Brazil, the AFL CIO's union groups. In just one country in one year, twenty million dollars to the union groups there. Speaker 1: Weird there was an election that year. Speaker 0: Yeah. Weird there. And and it was specifically for for labor for for mobilization of the unions and organize help them better organize themselves. Do you remember that Lula was the head of the workers party? Yeah. Remember who broke him out of jail? It was the AFL CIO. Who did the AFL CIO name the man of the year? I think it was in 2021 or 2022. They named Lula the man of the year. And what is the AFL CIO? Or it's not only was it, you know, directly sponsored by the Central Intelligence Agency for thirty years during the Cold War, but now they don't even need that because they have the CIA spinoff, National Endowment for Democracy, which has its own union branch called the Solidarity Center. The Solidarity Center is a formal part of AFL CIO. It is inseparable from it, and the Solidarity Center kicks them kicks them money. So what I'm saying is the Chamber of Commerce was threatened by a potential abandonment of of cutting the wind for them, of Trump doing, you know, liberal interventions, military interventions, humanitarian interventions in every country on God's green earth, we would just go in, replace the government, and then what would happen to AT and T if they couldn't get those contracts? What would happen to Amex if we didn't have you know, USAID's Dia app in Ukraine? Or I'm sorry, think it's Visa. So that Visa gets all the credit card processing for all the transactions there. What would happen, you know, to to Starbucks if we abandon the USAID coffee programs in Peru and Colombia and the Central African Republic? What would happen, you know, to the petroleum companies if we didn't, you know, militarily step up our presence to so the Chamber of Commerce and the unions, labor and management had a common enemy common enemy the same way Democrats and Republicans did when Trump first came on the scene because anyone who wants to put America First is going to run straight into everyone who wants to put their own interests first, America be damned. Speaker 1: And nicely nicely put. So let's end by well, I hope you will end by explaining if you were to, I don't know, defang these groups, drain the swamp, as we say, who would you go after first, and how would you do it? To restore democracy to the country, the premise that the people rule, that elections matter, that there's the change people want when they get a new leader, that is democracy. Speaker 0: There's three layers of it. There's the executive branch layer, the legislative, and the judicial. On the executive branch layer, an unbelievable amount of positive accomplishments have been done through the executive branch. And I think that the the the Trump admin deserves credit, even as we're unsatisfied with how big this is, and how many problems there have been with Congress, and judges blocking things. It took a lot of political capital to do what they did, and they were aggressive at almost every layer of it with some very big asterisks and exceptions. The idea of The firing of 14,000 people at USAID, the closure of the offices, the funding pauses was absolutely massive. Both symbolically and in very, very real terms. The restructuring that Marco Rubio has led at the State Department is absolutely massive. Like a 35 sub agencies are being riffed, know, totally killed. You know, the reduction in force totally laid off so that you don't even need the congressional approval because the there's no job for fire people to go back to because the division doesn't exist anymore. Those include the democracy rights and government the democracy rights and labor bureau at the State Department, which is the number one coordinating web, I guess, in tandem with the International Organization Bureau. But democracy rights and labor is the like the main place at state for the NGOplex. Because they're all getting this funding, and they're all coordinating with the State Department, getting the protection of the State Department because they are promoting democracy as the State Department wants them to do. The rights in it stands for human rights because you know, human rights violations in foreign countries, and then labor is, know, the unions and the and this is where you get the rental riots and all this. And you can go online and see weeping videos from people from the Democracy Rights and Labor Bureau that they've been working there for fifteen, twenty years, and suddenly it's gone, and it is going to have a devastating of course, it never has a devastating impact on these things. I mean, great example is the AP ran a ran a story about I think the initial title for it was Trump's Move to End US AID Crushes Cocaine Programs Dedicated combating the cocaine trade, and they the article is the biggest self owned you'll ever read. It's all about how, you know, we have all this money that goes to Colombia and to Peru and to Bolivia to to stop the cocaine, to stop stop drug trafficking in the you know, Colombia's number one, Peru's number two, biggest coca leave, you know, cultivation on in the world. Goes on to say, we spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year to Cocaine is going to flourish. Then they have a statement that they include, because they reached out to the president of Columbia. President of Columbia says, we're thrilled that USAID is gone. Speaker 2: They, you know, they they they made the problem worse. Then they they they go to Peru, and the number two, know, Coke Coke sorry, Cokoliv cultivator. And they said that Speaker 0: the Columbia the Peruvian government refused to comment, but we talked to the former head of the National Commission on, you know, narcotics prevention, the, you know, the former head of the part of the Peruvian government that handles this. And he said, you know, thank God the USAID programs are are on on combating cocaine here are gone. They were the primary problem in this whole thing. Actually, the, and he and he he gives an example. He says, actually, not only did none of the money actually ever reach the groups, but they only slowed down action that the Peruvian government tried to do. When when the Peruvian government tried to do something to Speaker 2: stop cocaine, USAID would step in and they would delay things, they would drag things. It's almost like Speaker 0: they wanted cocaine. And then Speaker 2: he gives the example of these he says, and in in Bolivia right next door, Bolivia banned USAID in 2013, and they drastically reduced the the the cocaine trafficking and because there was no USA Cocaine program keeping the cocaine flowing. And so anyway, but what Speaker 0: what I'm saying is this is all done through these, you know, these state department bureaus, which are now being reorganized. And one of the so at the executive branch level, I would say there's huge wins at the National Science Foundation, which is a major, you know, NGO and university sponsor for this. Yeah. A couple of big misses though. How the National Endowment for Democracy remains fully funded. They were talking a big talk, the Trump administration, about defunding the National Endowment for Democracy, which I would say is one of, if not the worst of the worst offender in this entire space, especially with Damon Wilson at the helm, who came straight from the Atlanta Council Digital Forensics Research Lab, which was the censorship supercenter of the Western world. Seven CIA directors on the Atlantic Council's board funded by the Pentagon State Department and USAID. The Atlantic Council where he came from at that time, the Atlantic Council was running training seminars to get journalists to flag Trump tweets, including one seminar called I Call Bullshit, where the Atlanta Council Digital Forensics Research Lab with where Damon Wilson was the head, they are training schools of journalists holding up Trump tweets on a on Jumbotron that says two words, witch hunt. This is two this is one month before the Mueller hearing, so Russiagate was at its apex. They wanted to censor or call disinformation Trump's attempt to present his own case around Russiagate, and they provoked journalists to hold up Atlantic Council sponsored placards with the word bullshit on it, and that means sponsored by you and me because we pay for them through 11 different government agencies. Pay the Atlantic Speaker 1: So why are they why why is NED, National Network of Democracy Atlanta Council, why are they still getting government money? Speaker 0: I'm not privy to those internal conversations. I have actually seen the IR so there's four cores at at NED. There's the two political branches, NDI for the Democrats and National Democratic Institute, IRI for the Republicans, the International Speaker 1: McCain ran for years. Speaker 0: Yep. McCain ran. Mitt Romney's on the board. Madeleine Albright, by the way, was the head of NDI. Hunter Biden was on the chairman's advisory board of NDI. Nina Jankovic was at NDI. But the so those are the two political branches. The and then there are the other two core fours are the exact other two groups who signed that secret agreement around organizing destabilizing street protests in case Trump won. The third one is called the Center for International Private Enterprise, CPE. That's the US Chamber of Commerce branch of NED. And the fourth one is called the Solidarity Center. That's the AFLCI union arm of So what do you know? The never Trump Republicans, the Democrats, the Chamber of Commerce, and the unions, the exact group behind the transition integrity project, which explicitly plotted in the height of the George Floyd riots, ran a war game about how the Biden campaign, in case Trump won in a clear win scenario clear Trump win was the name of their scenario. Scenario three is in June 2020. How the Biden campaign could get racial justice activists from these riots to be, quote, receptive to a Biden call to take to the streets and plotted what needed to be done to resource them and to cultivate relationships with Black Lives Matter's senior leadership and community leaders so that they would owe the Biden administration favors in case they need to be called on. And lo and behold, who's facing 50,000,000,000 billion dollars? The chamber of commerce then flooded them with $50,000,000,000 in contributions. Do you remember that? All the different Chamber of Commerce companies just flooded billions of dollars of donations to BLM. Speaker 1: To destroy our country. Speaker 0: Yes. I mean, while the AFL CIO and SEIU were all on the streets with them, just like they are around the world when we want riots in Georgia. We want riots in Serbia. We want riots in Hungary. We go straight to the AFL CIO branch. And but those are the four corners of Ned are the exact four corners of the effective insurrection against Trump during turmoil. Speaker 1: I don't understand how that can remain. Speaker 0: I know IRI has made reforms. Let me say this to their credit. In full disclosure, they have reached out to me, and I think I've mentioned this publicly before, but I haven't really been able to say all that much because it's just doesn't really come up much. And I have seen them attempt to make reform. This is the Republican side of it. And I've heard from folks around its senior leadership that they that they've recognized how elements of what they were doing before were inappropriate. They'd gone rogue. That certain people who were there are not there anymore, that they're trying to align their actions with the foreign policy set by their sponsors, the US government. And I've seen, and I have seen genuine good faith efforts. Speaker 1: They're trying to participate in democracy now. Speaker 0: Look, I'm not weighing into whether or not they're doing it for cynical self serving reasons, what. But frankly, you could argue they may have been doing the other, the bad stuff, or because the Biden administration wanted them, you know, to do that, or because the, you know, Trump was on shaky ground in his own first term, and didn't really control his own congress, or or budget, had a very strong coalition. But the point is is NDI has not made those not made those reforms at all. The the Solidarity Center has not made those reforms. And the issue is is if you if you say, okay, IRI has reformed, the Republican branch of it has, but these other three are still rogue. Well then, what happens, the whole purpose of Ned is that it's bipartisan, and that it therefore sort of synchronizes US policy, US foreign policy on both sides of the political aisle, because everyone's on the take. So everyone has a reason I get it. To invade Ukraine. Everyone has a reason to topple the side. But if only if IRI reforms, but NDI doesn't, what happens to Ned? Do you see what I say? Speaker 1: I do. What I this is my last question, but and you you will know the answer. So when I hear you talk, it's like it's my childhood. You know, I just grew up around this stuff, and, you know, pre '91, the assumption was we're locked in an existential struggle with the forces of darkness, the Soviets on board with that. Post '91, you know, ultimately, we came to realize that we run the entire world, and that's like a huge management project to keep everything under control and sort of moving in the right direction. But, you know, we're in charge of the world. Post 2023, there's, like, there's no way you can tell yourself that. It's just not true. And the BRICS is now it represents a bigger economy, bigger population, bigger military than the West. So I guess my question is, do the people running all these different groups understand that their nineteen eighties era assumptions are just, like, overtaken by events? Do they see the world clearly? Do they know the limits to their own power? Do they know what's up? Speaker 0: I think they do actually. Good. As I mentioned, I'm reading Bill Burns's autobiograph, the CIA director for Biden. Speaker 1: Very close friend of Epstein's, by the way. No. No. Just just a fact. Yes. I know. I just saw just saw emails from Epstein to him. Someone showed me. Doesn't I think Bill Burns is a very smart guy, and I'm not for Bill Burns, but I'm not I'm just saying, he's a friend of Epstein's. Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. But I think there is recognition of that. And I think this is also why you see this everything is alliance based, and why you see, for example, the Biden administration moving so deeply in tandem with the EU on all things. And using EU regulatory action to box out, you know, populace. The Biden administration was totally behind the EU digital censorship act that is going to become Completely. Yes. Literally, I I think their internal documents from their White House information integrity working group planning the whole thing, as well as The USA programs to to beef up the terms of it so that it can be used against domestic enemies in America. But the fact is is I think this is this is part of the global alliance structure, and I I actually don't think that the Biden administration really moved unilaterally assuming unipolar power. Almost almost every major foreign policy decision, you know, would would have the buy in of The UK, France, the in power parties in Germany and Canada, and paid very close attention to to and and and in fact, you know, partnering with in many many ways China. I mean, Trump blocked China from being able to import oil and gas from Iran. Blocked that for four years. Two months into Biden's term, China inked the Iran deal for 400,000,000,000 by $400,000,000,000 of oil and gas from Iran. It's just I So I don't think there is a kind of as much of the unipolar There is some of it, definitely. Like you hear the John Bolton types, you know, talk about, you know, almost presupposing that we can just bully everyone around. But I think even that is done with an expectation that it's going to be NATO wide. It's going to have, you know, allies around the world. But but I To your point, I think that the Ukraine, Russia war, and you know, has been a humbling period, which I think is why there actually is an appetite for peace. Even within many aspects of the blob, they just want peace on terms that are beyond their leverage to obtain. And that is a war of attrition that you know, gets back to the the efforts to cut USAID and the NGOplex. USAID spent $15,000,000,000. I think it was one year alone on on Ukraine on this. The USAID NGOs are are funding the pensions of people in Ukraine, are are are funding the the salaries of municipal workers. There's more welfare for people in Ukraine from USAID than, you know, effectively American citizens who live here legally. And but the fact is is if that USAID spigot gets cut, things will go south very quickly. This is why the EU is creating its own army. Know, built a trillion dollar budget that they've announced that for the EU to, you know, effectively create a parallel NATO in case Trump gets out of that. But in the heat of this, you know, I mentioned a few of the failings. One of them, Ned. Another one is a trillion dollar Pentagon budget is hard for me to imagine that that does not go to prolonging the war, but the Trump administration is a tough choice. If you totally deprive Ukraine of the lifeline that they've had, everything crumbles immediately. But then you lose the the deal terms. You in the sense that there's no hope to have territory in Eastern Ukraine, you know, flow back to control by the Kiev government. There's no hope to recover the the all the petroleum resources in Ukraine. Ukraine is the third largest shale reserves, I believe, in all of Europe, especially in the Donbas and off the offshore in Crimea and the Black Sea. And so, you know, I think Trump is between a blob and a hard place. You know, he he has to if he wants a budget done, he needs Congress to approve. We do not have a populist super majority in Congress. We have there are more populists now in Congress than they were under Trump won. So I don't think Trump will will get as rolled as he was by Paul Ryan, but there will be rolling undoubtedly. As we've seen 26 members of congress, think, have said that they're not going to approve the Doge cuts, just the Doge cuts. And while you're getting handed even more money from a trillion dollar Pentagon budget, and how much of that trillion is going to be civil military, I. E. NGOs, because the military funds these NGOs. As I mentioned, the secretary of war is on the board for the US Institute of Peace. The the Pentagon pays the Atlantic Council. The Pentagon pays for NATO, has all the social res societal resilience and social cohesion grants to the NGO space to do all this. And so a lot of you can shut down USAID, but you can just call it civil civil military, and the civil society NGOs will be funded by the Pentagon. So Trump has to keep his coalition together. And so he he's he can't get everything he wants. Just as we're not a unipolar power anymore, Trump is not a unipolar president. But So so I'm happy with singles and doubles as long as as long as the direction line is towards a better country. The question is, are we even gonna get the singles or doubles, or is, you know, is the blob gonna get enough home runs and triples on the other side of it that on net, nothing comes to pass. Speaker 1: When you next come back, I'd I'd love to hear what a trillion dollars a year buys. Considering that we're separated from our enemies by two oceans and face no invasion threat, I'm thinking that's a pretty big budget, and I know that I'm probably not a good Republican for pointing that out, but I guess I'm not a good Republican in general, but like, what is that? Speaker 0: So Here's the problem, it buys votes. Speaker 2: No. I know Buys votes in Congress. Speaker 0: If you want if you want to fire people at the Justice Department, if you want to people approved, you know, by the Senate for their positions, if you want to get rid of the Department of Education, hey, you might need to give them a you might need to give them a Pentagon bone. And and it's a very dirty soup. Speaker 1: Mike Benz, a very clean man. I appreciate it. Thanks, doctor. Thank you.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I consider Mike Benz one of the most dangerous people for America. The issue isn’t what he is saying, but rather what he’s not saying. He will never mention AIPAC or similar groups. Look into his early life and you’ll understand why. https://t.co/lbPwClFRw3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish people are indoctrinated from birth to believe in the "Holocaust industry." Persecution propaganda is a strong bond of Jewish identity, teaching Jews to set themselves apart and believe in their superiority due to their endurance. The Holocaust narrative, according to the speaker, started in 1967 after the Six-Day War to justify Israel's occupation of land and to combat assimilation by fostering ethnocentrism. The speaker accuses Jewish power structures of using the Holocaust for political and financial gain, including influencing politicians like Trump through Zionist money. They express feeling disgusted by the creation of Jewish History Month, viewing it as an overreach. The speaker claims Jewish power controls other diversity groups, including the NAACP and La Raza, giving them electoral muscle within the DNC. They question Jewish leadership's actions, given that Jews run Hollywood and the media, creating a need to both hide and profess their power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's probably no one who is fed more Jewish propaganda at an early age than Jews. Like like, we are revved up from, like, the day we're born to believe in the Holocaust, like, industry writ large. Like, we are revved up like wind up dolls. Speaker 1: And what about he calls Auschwitz survivors assholes in his public speech in October of nineteen ninety one? Speaker 0: Oh, I think that's fair. I mean, first of all, I mean, hold on. I mean well, hold on. Hold on Speaker 2: a second. I say fair. Right? I was a second degree proud boy back when Gavin McGinnis was you know, had started the the Proud Boys as a sort of, the West is the best civic nationalism organization during the lead up to the Trump election. And I was very optimistic about about Proud Boys when when it started. I thought that they had all the right antagonists, so to speak. Right? The fact that, they, I knew Gavin, you know, not not at a deep level, but, you know, I I'm a New York guy, and so he personally beat the crap out of me to induct me into the second degree. Speaker 0: Persecution propaganda is the strong bond of Jewish identity. And we are taught from an early age to set ourselves apart using persecution propaganda, and then also like this survivor complex that we are better than any other group because we've endured more than any other group, and we did it because of our smarts, and therefore we're smarter than other group. And then we were unleashed into the world where we, you know, like we have this feeling that we need to constantly sort of not tell people that we are set apart, that we do see ourselves as, like, superior in this way while, like, adopting this social justice mask of, like, everybody being equal. Yes. You know, I would be one of the reasons that I am so against the Holocaust industry, and I'm so against the tactics that organized Jewish power structures have used, particularly since the nineteen seventies in America, Nineteen Sixties and seventies. You have remember, the Holocaust started in 1967. I mean, it's you're not gonna find references to it before then. It started as a way to the uniqueness doctrine was born in response to the Six Day War in 1967, and it was initially done to justify Israel keeping, you know, keeping land that it occupied after 1967. But then, because the AJC poll and the WJC, they do all these polls, like, constantly. They found that that the Holocaust led to an enormous amount of in group ethnocentrism. It it solved the out marriage problem. It solved it solved the, like, assimilation problem where Jews were starting to lose their Jewish identity. You're seeing a resurgence of that, by the way, nowadays. And and it's why you're starting to see mandatory holocaust education in public schools in more and more Holocaust films, even though, like, it's it's getting farther and farther away in history. Because in order to keep Jews involved in these Jewish power structures and, like, organized explicitly around their identity, they they need persecution porn. And that includes Trump. I mean, Trump is you know, I I love the guy, but we we also need to be honest that he would not be here without Zionist money. Right? Speaker 3: I mean Yes. Speaker 0: APAC delivered Trump, and Trump is in debt to the APAC network. And that's part of the reason that he declared the month of May Jewish history month forever and always after this. Do you know that, Kayla? Speaker 3: Oh, I did not know. Oh, god. Yep. Yep. Speaker 0: We we just got a we we just we just got a month. Speaker 3: So It could Speaker 0: have, like, Speaker 3: a million holocaust days, and then yeah. Why not? Just take the whole month. Can we shove all of the holocaust remembrance days in just one month? Just Speaker 0: just no? Wishful thinking. But no. It's it's more like a look. This is more like a it's more like a settlement in the West Bank. Right? Like, I mean, this is the way I feel as a Jewish guy. It's like, yeah. Like, you know, maybe, like, a fraction of the land is, like, you know, you can make a claim to. But, like, certainly not all of it. Like, certainly not the holocaust industry as it's currently constructed, and absolutely not the the the settlements in the West Bank. Like, on top of all that, we're going to also have, like, an African American history month, like, now forever always for Jews in the month of May. Like, it's just this is, one of these things where it's, you know, I'm, like I feel like I need to say sorry personally because it's just so disgusting. Speaker 1: Greatest scene was them shouting anti white while encircling those who prevented them from marching for it that they've heard. Shout anti white in their face. Make them have to respond to that charge. Force them into that frame. Do you accept that you're anti white? Make them say yes. Make them say yes. If they say no, well, the frame is yours. Speaker 0: Get the fuck out of Google, Washington Post. Get the fuck off Facebook. Oops. There goes your YouTube channel. You wanna you wanna put us a podcast on Spotify? Get the fuck out. It's hate speech and it's targeted harassment. You're done Speaker 2: if there was any justice. And by god, there will be. If I sound radical, I wanna make a radical out of you. Speaker 1: Doctor Steinleit is saying here in 02/2001, some fifty five years after the alleged holocaust, and I say alleged because the holocaust industry really formed in the nineteen seventies. Speaker 0: Black people are starting to fucking hate you now. Don't you like like, there is a a tremendous amount of Jewish power is because it controls the other diversity industry groups. Okay? So, like, you know, most people here probably understand that, you know, that that APAC and the JCRCs and the Jewish Federations and United Israel, all those groups, they are the umbrella group on top of the NAACP, La Raza, the LGBT groups, the, you know, the the and to some extent, pan Asian groups are relatively independent. But, you know, the electoral muscle of organized Jewry is because they control the votes of of Hispanics and African Americans. I mean, that's without that, you you wouldn't have you wouldn't have the DNC identity politics behemoth. But, anyway, well, the point I'm trying to build towards is, like, if you're thinking long term and you actually wanna stay in America, what the fuck are you doing, Jewish leadership? Who runs Hollywood? Jews do, of course. Who runs the media? Jews do. Like, you're gonna see this schizophrenic Jewish masculinity problem, where on the one hand, we need to hide our power levels in order to protect our positions of power. And on the other hand, we need to profess our power levels in need in order to attract women.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Some more information. Unfortunately, people are blind. Nobody is looking at the facts. Dangerous man. https://t.co/3rFqFddJRP

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

This liberal is @mikebenzcyber. – Between 2016 and 2018, he covertly operated “Frame Game”, a Gab account known for pushing antisemitic tropes, racial IQ theories, and even Holocaust revisionism. He later claimed it was a “Jewish deradicalization project”—but an analysis of 200+ videos suggests otherwise. Mossad cover? – “Frame Game” positioned itself as a trusted voice in redpill circles—blending in just enough to manipulate and monitor. – Before reinventing himself as a censorship expert, he scrubbed the internet of Frame Game content. – He appeared on Twitter in December 2022, conveniently timed with the release of the Twitter Files. – Strangely, there’s no verifiable online footprint of Michael Adam Bruno Benz before this. No blog posts. No prior work. NOTHING. – His LinkedIn profile vanished just before his reinvention. – He cleaned up his appearance and public persona to project professionalism. – Over the last 20 months, he’s subtly undermined independent censorship researchers like @sparklingruby—often by co-opting their findings and steering the conversation. – Searching for “Michael Benz” before 2023 yields no meaningful results—anomalous for someone in such high-profile circles. – In Twitter Spaces and interviews, he redirects key conversations to reinforce his narrative control. – He’s now deeply embedded in major censorship investigations—earning the trust of Taibbi, Shellenberger, @TuckerCarlson, and even Jim Jordan’s Weaponization Committee. Something doesn’t add up. Who is Mike Benz, really? Look into his family background—you’ll start to understand. This isn’t organic. You’re all being played.

goddeketal
Posted - May 16, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Saved - May 17, 2025 at 11:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm frustrated with the Krassensteins, who project themselves as moral authorities while having a questionable past. They began by exploiting teenage fan communities for fame and later transitioned to politics, using automation to inflate their follower counts. Their history includes involvement in Ponzi schemes and financial scams, which led to investigations and civil forfeitures. Despite their claims of reform, they continue to engage in deceptive practices, including manipulating social media for profit. I've documented their actions and urge others to be cautious.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ Are you also sick of the Krassensteins pretending to be moral authorities while calling Trump the devil himself? And did you know they owed their fame to running teen groupie accounts and making their living scamming people and selling teen p0rn domains? A THREAD 🧵 https://t.co/VXafgNejkx

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2/ The Krassensteins' political careers didn’t begin with policy or journalism. Brian and Ed began by targeting teenage fan communities. Edward ran @bieberfanclubs, Brian ran @JONASBROTHER5. These accounts, followed by teen girls, were later renamed and repurposed for politics. https://t.co/L5PL73LPth

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3/ What followed was buying high-follower accounts, especially fan pages. The strategy was simple: acquire reach, not earn it. They wanted ready-made audiences of emotionally engaged teens to convert into political influence. Btw. edbri871 stands for Ed & Brian. And 871? Well... https://t.co/zeRPsQXKgB

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4/ Brian and Ed likely used follow-unfollow scripts—tools that mass-follow users to gain follow-backs, then unfollow non-returners. This violates X guidelines. Until recently, both followed exactly 506.3K accounts, a number that hints at automation, not organic growth. https://t.co/njBwlAUIj8

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5/ Following 500k+ users on X manually would take 29 days at 5 sec/follow, non-stop. Unfollowing non-reciprocators could add months. No one does this by hand. As a scientist, I see this as a calculated move to inflate popularity with tools, not build it through real engagement. https://t.co/CBvkNcVdj0

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6/ Once their follower counts were artificially inflated, they rebranded the accounts. Ed became @EdKrassen, Brian became @krassenstein. Both jumped on the Trump-resistance train and became full-time reply guys under every Trump tweet to farm engagement. https://t.co/RSULZ0Lbpy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7/ But before politics, their real income came from HYIPs — high-yield investment programs. These were Ponzi schemes promising big returns and leaving thousands of victims behind. They weren’t small-time players. They were literally working with the Russian mob to "scam people." https://t.co/e8d1evcKef

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8/ Court documents show, that one of their partners was CSMFinance, asking users to install a “finance app” that was actually malware. This gave the operators backdoor access to victims' systems. A financial scam disguised as software, and people fell for it by the thousands. https://t.co/ioKOSIlakk

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9/ Another was ReProFinance. It used Liberty Reserve, an anonymous currency widely used in laundering. ReProFinance made lulling payments to early users to appear legitimate. It collapsed in 2012 after being exposed in fraud forums and watchdog lists. https://t.co/tElmzrDpBp

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10/ Next came “The Safe Depositary” — another Ponzi scheme. Same tactics: unrealistic returns, fake testimonials, and quiet vanishings. But the financial footprint didn’t vanish. It tied back to a $465,000 wire transfer connected to the Krassensteins’ property in Cape Coral. https://t.co/QI23A1zNyn

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11/ That money came from a Bank of America account in their name. It included $200,000 from their advertising business and a $365,000 CD redemption. Investigators found that most of these funds were traceable to HYIP proceeds. It wasn’t speculation. It is well-documented. https://t.co/eZYS9Pv9ov

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12/ Their homes were raided. They later agreed to civil forfeitures. No criminal convictions, as they most likely made a deal with the DOJ/FBI. And shortly afterward, they rebranded publicly as Trump’s loudest critics. Timing that shouldn’t be ignored and is highly suspicious. https://t.co/33ViNBi6Kv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal investigators raided a home in South Fort Myers owned by twin brothers Edward and Brian Kressenstein, who neighbors say are also business partners. Agents carried dozens of boxes out of the home on Anchorage Way, and also visited another home one street over owned by one of the brothers. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed they executed search warrants along with Homeland Security Investigations, but wouldn't say why. HSI investigates financial crimes like money laundering, cybercrimes, and narcotics and weapons smuggling. A former associate said one brother told him he was subpoenaed for one of his businesses. The brothers are listed as cofounders of a company called 3D Print, described as a news organization for 3D printing. The news reached out to the company and brothers but received no response. A man outside the home ran inside when he saw the news crew arrive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New at 05:30, NBC two learning more about a raid on a home in South Fort Myers. Property records show the home on Anchorage Way off Iona Road is owned by Edward and Brian Kressenstein. Neighbors tell us they are not only twins, but business partners. NBC two anchor Brittany Weiner spoke with a man who used to work closely with the brothers. Speaker 1: Well, Peter, that man that I spoke with tells me that these brothers were great business partners for at least two years, but he says recently, one of those brothers told him he was subpoenaed for one of his businesses. For hours, people in this South Fort Myers community watched as federal investigators carried dozens of boxes out of this home on Anchorage Way. Speaker 2: I saw at least 25 police cars and homeland security. Speaker 1: Jim is working three doors down and spoke with investigators. Speaker 2: They're here to remove everything from the house, all the computer software and all that stuff, and they walked at least twenty, thirty bundles of stuff out of the house into their cars. Speaker 1: Neighbors say agents also paid a visit to a home one street over where property records show one of the brothers also owns a home. Speaker 0: I'm surprised. Speaker 1: US immigration and customs enforcement confirmed its agency along with homeland security investigators executed search warrants in the area but wouldn't say why. Speaker 0: It was an odd combination which makes you wonder, wow. Speaker 1: We learned HSI investigates financial crimes such as money laundering and cash smuggling, as well as cybercrimes and narcotics and weapons smuggling. Speaker 2: There was some corruption going on inside that house between two brothers. Speaker 1: We found the brothers are listed as cofounders of a company called three d Print, said to be a news organization for three d printing. We reached out to that company and the brothers, but have not heard back. And there was a man outside of this home when we arrived earlier today. Now that man that was outside the home ended up running inside as soon as they saw us. We did knock on the door a few times, but no one answered. Reporting live in Lee County, Brittany Weiner, NBC 2.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13/ This is in particular suspicious as Brian and Ed (a.k.a. Uncle Awesome... WTF?) were outspoken Trump fans just a few years before becoming hardcore anti-Trumpers. So, what caused this 180-degree turn? I have my personal theories, which you can probably guess. https://t.co/wBE3wNnsbu

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14/ More concerning is that they (edbri871) bought and sold underage teen p0rn domains, many with suggestive names like "17onlygirls" or "humiliatedschoolgirls," resembling trafficking patterns. These domains were publicly registered under their names and later sold and used. https://t.co/UPugldU0rA

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15/ My research made waves, with @DailyMail reporting on it. @EdKrassen claimed the domain was for perfume/DVD ads, but @waybackmachine shows this is false for when they owned it. https://t.co/t5Z9lyQQIn

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16/ Ed Krassenstein even claimed to the article's journalist he didn’t specifically seek such domains, only purchasing domain bundles. The journalist then asked me for evidence, which I quickly supplied. Proof confirms Ed and Brian deliberately targeted teen domains for purchase. https://t.co/mI8Uc2EaGT

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17/ When I first exposed the Krassenstein brothers for owning such underage p0rn domains, Brian whined about not being able to censor me. People silenced and censored me during Covid for speaking the obvious, and I won’t let anyone cancel me for that again. https://t.co/0JF32PK4g4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is concerned about a post with 6,000,000 views that continues to gain 200,000 views per hour. They are unable to get the post removed. The speaker believes the responsibility for removing such content should not solely fall on the individual, especially after it has already gained significant traction. They claim that attempting to have X (formerly Twitter) remove the content is futile. The speaker suggests there should be a mechanism, such as sending a cease and desist to X, to facilitate content removal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The line, and it can't just be up to the person to do something about it because that post could have been removed when it had a hundred thousand views. Instead, it has 6,000,000 views, and every hour, it's getting another 200,000 views. And it doesn't have to be there and I can't get it taken down. There's no way for me to get it taken down. If I try to get Twitter x to take it down, they're not gonna do it. So there has to be something there. Like, there should be able to you I should be able to to send a cease and desist to x and get content removed

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18/ Speaking of COVID: The Krassensteins’ COVID-era posts and statements mirrored their deceptive tactics, sounding like Big Pharma scripts and making no sense. Well, anyone foolish enough to trust them on medical questions has only themselves to blame. https://t.co/rzN7JGo8WA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the vaccine saved hundreds of thousands of lives but acknowledges side effects and breakthrough infections. The speaker argues that the vaccine was claimed to stop transmission and infection, but it did not. An argument ensues with someone who disagrees, with accusations of being crazy and shutting up. The speaker denies using ad hominem attacks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mission. The lives or at least hundreds of thousands of lives because people got the vaccine. It it are there side effects? Yes. Do some people still get it? The that's the vaccine changed as well as the virus changed over the course of those two years. The point of this, she said that it was gonna stop transmission and infection. In fact It did. It took it stopped. No. It didn't. It you're crazy. If you look at you the Brian. Brian. With the first a second. Stop transitioning. Fuck up for a second. No. You shut the fuck No. I'm done hearing your little woman voice. No. I'm I'm could I be talking? What That's really Yeah. That's really I'm I'm not doing the ad hominem attacks.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19/ Another disturbing incident involves a deleted tweet from Brian in 2022, appearing to blackmail a DNC staffer named Becky. When confronting him, he claimed that he wanted to show how fast conspiracy theories spread over the internet. I call that bullshit. https://t.co/KRUl6MbAIR

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20/ To defend himself, Brian released a video claiming he wrote an email to himself before sending the tweet, to prove it was a “conspiracy test.” But metadata showed the email timestamp had been tampered with, as I show in the clip below. So why did they try to blackmail Becky? https://t.co/8q6zuAPfys

Video Transcript AI Summary
In December 2022, Brian Krasenstein posted and quickly deleted a tweet appearing to blackmail "Becky," mentioning the DNC and "secrets." Confronted with a screenshot, Krasenstein claimed fabrication, but evidence confirmed the tweet's authenticity. Krasenstein then released a video admitting to the tweet, claiming it was a planned experiment to demonstrate misinformation spread on Twitter. He said he emailed himself two minutes before posting the tweet to prove his intent. However, analysis suggests Krasenstein manipulated the email's date and time, and reused footage indicates video editing. He also mistakenly displayed HTML code in the email header, further suggesting fabrication. The "Becky" in question may be Rebecca Santos Cetahall, given her DNC ties. The nature of the threatened secrets remains unknown. Krasenstein denies knowing any relevant Becky or secrets. The questions remain: Why did Krasenstein try to blackmail Becky, and was this an attempt to exert political influence?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Exposing Brian Crookenstein. On 12/12/2022 Twitter user Brian Krasenstein published a tweet that seemed intended to blackmail an individual named Becky. The tweet stated, Becky, we need more than this. The DNC is in trouble. You need us. Call me tomorrow if you still want us around. Otherwise, the secrets come out. Brian quickly deleted the tweet after posting it. When confronted with a screenshot capturing this deleted tweet, Brian Krasenstein suggested that the image was fabricated. However, I was able to obtain irrefutable evidence that confirmed the authenticity of the Becky tweet, a development that placed him in a delicate situation. In the wake of these events, Brian Krasenstein doubled down and released a video admitting that he wrote that tweet and that it was part of a bigger plan. He asserted that he had sent an email to himself two minutes before posting the controversial Becky tweet. As per the email, his sole aim was to demonstrate how quickly conspiracy theories spread on Twitter by sending out this specific tweet. Speaker 1: So what actually originated as a plan to bait conspiracy theorists five months ago, back way back in December, it finally caught a fish. Originally, I made the tweet I did because I wanted to do a story about how quickly misinformation spreads on Twitter and in in other social media platforms in general. Speaker 0: You're a bad liar, Brian. Speaker 1: So what I did was I typed up this tweet about Becky. I hit the send button, waited about twenty seconds, and then I deleted it. Of course, though, I made sure to prove that it was not real as you can see in this video right here. Speaker 0: Brian then presents his email. However, what we notice is that Brian doesn't display the entire screen. This is because the actual time and date of the email would be revealed on the right side of the screen. Before we proceed, I've also set up a Gmail account to mimic Brian's account. This is to demonstrate just how simple it is to manipulate the date and time parameters in the pop down that Brian clicked on, thus displaying an alternate date. Additionally, identical mouse movements seen in the reused footage within the same video suggest extensive editing, not a live demonstration, thus casting doubt on the authenticity of his claims. Now, let's hone in on a key oversight by Brian Krasenstein in fabricating this email. Brian blunders while presenting the header mistakenly pasting the HTML code instead of the plain text thereby further revealing his manipulation attempts. Big fail, Brian. So who is Becky? It's probable that the Becky Brian Krossenstein allegedly tried to blackmail as Rebecca Santos Cetahall considering her DNC affiliation. The unresolved mystery is the nature of the secrets Brian threatened to reveal. And what does Brian, the manipulator and wire fraudster, have to say about Becky? I know one Becky that I can think of. She is a relative and has nothing to do with the DNC. I also don't know any secrets. The questions we must ask are, why did Brian Krasenstein try to blackmail Becky? And could this be one of his employer's objective to wield political influence through blackmail? These are questions that Brian will not answer, but will attempt to deflect with deceptive tactics and ad hominem attacks. What remains clear is that Brian Krasenstein did himself no favors with this attempt at forgery. Therefore, I'll leave the final word to him to draw a conclusion from his actions. Speaker 1: Hook, line, sinker.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21/ Probably for the same reason as usual: exploiting any platform or tragedy to grow followers for profit. On Facebook, they ran manipulative pages and used the 2010 Haiti earthquake to launch groups, not for aid, but to game algorithms and monetize audiences. https://t.co/EIqcg4Izrs

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22/ Another Krassenstein Facebook group promised to "empty their bank account" ($2,450) for Haiti at 10M fans, which is an unattainable goal to manipulate emotions. Once they got followers, they pushed @KrassenCast and sites. Did they empty their account? I doubt it. https://t.co/SHx70k2nYi

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23/ Currently, their scams seems to continue with nftz[.]me, hosted on malicious platforms flagged by VirusTotal for Loki Infostealer malware. It steals PII, crypto wallets—undetected by Smartscreen. Hosted in Germany, tied to Chinese and Eastern European crooks. Dirty as ever. https://t.co/RDRS8Is0DO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24/ Once a scammer, always a scammer. Even now, phishing emails are still being sent from their mail server, such as this reported email with the subject “Aztec Sex Rituals.” This public complaint is from 2023, so quite recently. https://t.co/ipWPC9aADb

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

25/ Brian even repeatedly lied about deleting his X account, proving the Krassensteins’ deceit. Want them to vanish into obscurity? Mute their accounts, and share this thread to expose their scams and make it go viral. If you care about integrity, follow me instead. https://t.co/ueP7s8HkaS

goddeketal
Posted - May 12, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 11:37 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Élysée Palace: “France’s enemies are spreading dangerous misinformation about President Macron’s alleged cocaine use.” Emmanuel Macron: https://t.co/X7XTKyTehl

goddeketal
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During COVID, journalists failed as the fourth pillar of democracy; instead, they acted as a wrecking ball. Rather than holding power accountable, they defended it and enforced lies, contributing to the erosion of freedom. As society shifts focus to new crises, I worry that people are forgetting the past. Those in power rely on this amnesia to escape accountability for their actions. I am committed to ensuring that we remember and hold those responsible for crimes against humanity accountable, especially the journalists who played a significant role in this.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The journalists weren’t the fourth pillar of democracy during COVID. They were the wrecking ball. They didn’t hold power to account — they defended it. They didn’t question the lies — they enforced them. They didn’t protect freedom — they helped destroy it. And what’s even more concerning is that people are already moving on. Now it’s all about the border crisis, the Middle East conflict, the conclave, the next big thing. Nobody wants to remember what happened. Nobody wants to talk about it. Those in power know this. They know people forget. They count on it. They know they can unleash hell, crush freedoms, destroy lives, and then distract you with the next crisis. No accountability. Ever. That’s why I’m working so hard to make sure we never forget, and why I’ll never stop until those responsible are held accountable. Crimes against humanity can’t be "moved on from." The journalists played a huge role in this. They don’t get to pretend it never happened. Not on my watch.

goddeketal
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 12:21 AM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a detailed account of how the pandemic was manipulated, highlighting staged footage, false PCR tests, and the promotion of asymptomatic transmission to justify restrictions. I pointed out the role of tech companies in censoring dissent and the use of fear-based messaging to control the public. I discussed how social isolation and lockdowns contributed to excess deaths and the shifting narrative around masks and vaccines. I emphasized the profits made by pharmaceutical companies and the silencing of dissenting voices, culminating in an abrupt end to the narrative when it became unsustainable.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC 1. China released staged footage of people "dropping dead" in the streets: scenes never seen anywhere else in the world prior and after December 2019. 2. A PCR test was introduced that didn’t determine if someone was actually sick. Almost all results were false positives. 3. They pushed the lie of asymptomatic transmission to justify restrictions on healthy people and mass testing the whole world. 4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and label truth as "misinformation." 5. Behavioral psychologists were used to craft fear-based messaging and manipulate public compliance. 6. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. 7. Since mild cold symptoms wouldn’t deliver that, they terrorized the global population to trigger a mass psychogenic illness. 8. Constant fearmongering led to chronically elevated cortisol levels, weakening immune systems, especially among the elderly. 9. Social isolation, medical neglect, and lockdowns caused the excess deaths they needed to support the narrative. 10. They suddenly claimed masks worked, something no serious authority had ever recommended before for respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking billboard for fear. 11. People were gaslit into staying home "until the vaccine was ready," giving authorities more time to expand control. 12. They injected billions with an experimental product, claiming it would prevent infection and transmission. 13. When that failed, they moved the goalposts: "If the unvaccinated don’t get the shot, your shot won’t work." 14. They invented new "variants" every few months to justify never-ending booster campaigns. 15. They fabricated a new condition, "long COVID," to cover up the mounting side effects of the injections. 16. Pharmaceutical giants made record profits, protected by government contracts and zero liability. 17. Those who spoke out were silenced, banned, investigated, or publicly discredited. 18. And once the narrative became too absurd to sustain, they abruptly declared the pandemic over, and pretended none of it had ever happened.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Since so many quadruple-boosted NPCs are calling me a liar, I’ve decided to drop a thread today backing up every single point with hard facts. Hit the notification bell on my profile so you don’t miss it.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Here we go! https://t.co/0bLWS9LTUt

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

goddeketal
Posted - April 30, 2025 at 7:52 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 6:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was exiled from my previous life for speaking out against COVID, which led me to leave Europe and start anew in the Brazilian rainforest with my supportive Brazilian lawyer wife. Here, I enjoy a self-sufficient lifestyle, drinking from freshwater springs and growing my own food, all while living free from government control. Though my finances are modest, every dollar I earn feels genuine and earned. I’m grateful for the support from my followers over the years, which has made this new life possible. Thank you for believing in me.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨THEY EXILED ME FROM THEIR SYSTEM FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST COVID. I BUILT SOMETHING BETTER. After losing my jobs in Europe, my access to my bank accounts, and every bit of trust I had in the system, I made a decision: I left everything behind and moved to the Brazilian rainforest. It wasn’t a random move, I married a Brazilian lawyer who stood by me through it all. Together, we built a new life, far away from the control and madness I once trusted. Out here, I drink from my own freshwater springs. I raise my own chickens, grow my own food in greenhouses, and live completely energy independent. Every day, I wake up surrounded by pure, clean air, real nature, and a life no government can touch. Of course, it's not without risks. Deadly snakes, spiders, jaguars, and pumas are part of daily life. But despite it all, I’m living my best life. And I wouldn’t trade it for anything. Financially, I’m far from where I once was. But every dollar I earn today, whether it’s through educating people here via ad revenue shares, or selling my vitamin D solutions through @sunfluencer, feels real. It feels earned. And it feels honest. Unlike the world of scientism I left behind. A world where "science" meant pleasing project funders, where being too critical or refusing to follow the narrative meant losing future grants. Instead of living trapped in a web of semi-truths, I finally broke free from those chains, and now, I can tell my truth to the world without fear. I'm deeply grateful for every single follower who has supported me over these past five years, through the storms, the despair, and the moments when the sun wasn’t shining. Your support made all of this possible. Thank you for believing in me.

_jaybaxter_
Posted - April 24, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Saved - April 25, 2025 at 5:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed concerns about potential inauthentic coordination and death threats, emphasizing that Community Notes does not censor posts but provides context. The representative clarified their role, stated they take the issues seriously, and mentioned recent anti-manipulation improvements. They sought clarification on the alleged death threat, which the user claimed was deleted. The representative noted that due to data protection laws, they cannot verify deleted notes beyond 21 days but confirmed that death threats violate their terms of service.

@_jaybaxter_ - Jay Baxter

First off: we are pro free-speech. Community Notes never censors any posts -- notes provide context only (we don't directly affect visibility or ranking of the original post). Thank you for reporting possible inauthentic coordination across accounts and death threats (which would both be terms of service violations). We take both of those very seriously and have been investigating since even before you called this out. For background info: we've rolled out multiple anti-manipulation improvements recently e.g. https://t.co/CP7d4xO1hy, https://t.co/ICOxgxbpn3, https://t.co/E4gHUEEcJy, and another improvement last year to cap note writing limits for low-quality authors directly in response to feedback like this https://t.co/8JPUWsMlQr. Just to clarify: 1) I am not the overall lead for Community Notes 2) I am not "Enterprising Desert Raven", nor do I know them, or any of the other accounts that may be coordinating together with "EDR" I've now unblocked you and others to try to have a productive conversation here. Why did I originally block you and others yesterday? I had replied to a post saying that obviously death threats are not ok, which got twisted into accusations that I tolerate death threats. I don't tolerate them! I checked, and the death threat in question seems to not exist (if it was real and not a fake screenshot, please share the noteId or tweetId in question if you have any info about it).

@CommunityNotes - Community Notes

We know contributors don't like seeing (or feeling obligated to rate) low-quality proposed notes. Perhaps the note is an opinion that would be better as a reply, or uses language that people feel is biased or argumentative. We launched an update that will help identify more

@CommunityNotes - Community Notes

Under the hood update: We’ve updated note ranking to further fortify against pile-ons or organic waves of ratings from one perspective. Notes now need a minimum number of ratings from raters with different perspectives, ensuring Helpful status reflects a more robust consensus and

@CommunityNotes - Community Notes

Under the hood update: We’ve further fortified against both organic and targeted pile-ons by augmenting the bridging algorithm to require more balanced engagement across raters. This approach measures balance based on the Net Helpful Ratings (Helpful minus Not Helpful) from

@CommunityNotes - Community Notes

✨Note writing limits now consider hit rate, a writer’s ratio of helpful to total notes written. To write many notes in 24h, a writer must have a history of helpful notes and a solid hit rate. This prevents large volumes of proposed notes that aren’t found helpful. Details in https://t.co/xWVC7b9Ch8

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This is the face of the man ruining @CommunityNotes for everyone. It's none other than the team lead himself—@_jaybaxter_. He’s been covering up a massive scandal inside Community Notes for well over a year. And once you hear about it, it’ll make your blood boil. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/px13KRbTo3

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@_jaybaxter_ You claim you were “investigating” before we raised the issue, but then say the death threat “seems to not exist”? If it didn’t exist, what exactly were you investigating? You can’t have it both ways. That’s not transparency, that’s damage control.

@_jaybaxter_ - Jay Baxter

I was obviously trying to find it and see what was going on. Please engage in better faith than that. Which post was the death threat on? (the screenshot you shared doesn't show what post it's on). That info would help figure out if this note was real and if so, what happened to it

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@_jaybaxter_ It was on the post below and got deleted after Liz first called it out last fall. I (and many others) saw the Community Note with our own eyes. I suppose you can verify it existed, and surely are be able to track who wrote it and who deleted it!? https://t.co/Cr7HvFOLoU

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

“Got my Bill Gates microchip implanted…gotta go back in 3 weeks to have it activated…I wonder what super powers it will give me…” Just wow. Her joke is literally the textbook definition of ‘Play Stupid Games…win Stupid Prizes’. Obituary/photo from @CartlandDavid https://t.co/TCmkUdNX5J

@_jaybaxter_ - Jay Baxter

Thanks, I had assumed you were talking about something more recent. To comply with GDPR and other data protection laws, we actually don't retain the text of deleted notes longer than 21 days, so I can't verify anymore. I can confirm that death threats are against TOS and if something like that was posted it'd be a violation though

goddeketal
Posted - April 23, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Saved - April 24, 2025 at 5:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m outraged by the actions of Enterprising Desert Raven, who has been harassing critics of Big Pharma on Community Notes. He even called for @liz_churchill10 to be harmed, yet faces no consequences due to his connections with @_jaybaxter_. Now, using a second account, he’s gaslighting the platform about a death threat note he wrote and had deleted. This is blatant harassment and abuse of the system. I demand that Community Notes acknowledge the existence of the note, explain its deletion, ban Ryan T., and take action against @_jaybaxter_. Enough is enough.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨BREAKING: Enterprising Desert Raven, who spends hours a day on Community Notes harassing Big Pharma critics, openly called for @liz_churchill10 to be put down. No ban. No consequences. Why? Because he’s friends with the head of Community Notes: @_jaybaxter_ The mask is off.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨‘Enterprising Desert Raven’ is now using his second Community Notes account, “Resplendent Cedar Osprey,” to gaslight the platform, claiming the ‘death threat note’ that he himself wrote and later (got) deleted never existed. WHAT THE FVCK??????? This is targeted harassment, system abuse, and political censorship. @CommunityNotes immediately needs to: – Admit the Note existed. – Disclose why it was deleted. – Ban Ryan T. from the platform and all moderation roles. – Get their employee @_jaybaxter_ under control. Enough is enough. CC: @elonmusk, @Safety

goddeketal
Posted - October 16, 2024 at 1:32 AM
Saved - April 24, 2025 at 11:19 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

'Enterprise Desert Raven,' closely tied to Big Pharma, continues to weaponize @CommunityNotes to spread lies and demonetize content creators. What makes this even more absurd is the fact that he’s buddies with X employee @_jaybaxter_ , who allows him to act unchecked. @elonmusk https://t.co/ZkcvO8Uzl8

goddeketal
Posted - April 21, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Saved - April 21, 2025 at 7:25 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Never forget. https://t.co/1eoH576qn9

goddeketal
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical”​ – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear​ via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation​, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”​ and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID​. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions​. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them​. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead​. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures​. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.
goddeketal
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 3:07 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Zero COVID arrests. Zero Epstein client arrests. Zero Big Pharma arrests. Zero human trafficking arrests. Zero election fraud arrests. Zero climate-scam arrests. Zero Ukraine money-laundering arrests. Welcome to clown world, justice edition.

goddeketal
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 5:27 AM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 6:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
They label me extreme, but here’s my stance: I believe the conflict in Ukraine began in 2014, and I reject the idea that men can become women. I see Covid as a hoax and think key figures should face justice. I argue that many global conflicts are driven by oil and that the world is influenced by harmful forces. I assert that all lives matter, communism fails its people, and CBDCs threaten freedom. I challenge the narrative on climate change, question authority, and view victimhood as a trap. I advocate for truth over tribalism and integrity over influence.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

They call me extreme. You decide. Here’s what I really stand for: 🇺🇦 Ukraine and NATO started the conflict in 2014. 🏳️‍⚧️ Men can neither be pregnant nor become women. 🦠 Covid was a hoax. So were the PCR tests. 🗝️ Fauci, Gates, Hotez and Co. should be locked up. 🛢️ Almost all international conflicts are about oil. 🎥 The world is run by pedophiles and Satanists. 🫂 All lives matter. No matter where you are from. 🇨🇳 Communism stifles freedom and fails its people. 🪙 CBDCs erode freedom and entrench surveillance. 🌡️ Plants love CO2. It is not a driver for climate change. 🧠 Intelligence is not obedience. Questioning is a duty. 💉 Big Pharma creates customers, not cures. 🏛️ The state isn’t your savior. It’s your handler. 🇮🇱 Khazarian converts ≠ Biblical Israelites. ❄️ Climate change is a hoax. We’re still in an ice age. 🧬 Transhumanism is the endgame, not your salvation. 💼 Most politicians are puppets. The rest get silenced. 🧢 Victimhood isn’t an identity, it’s a trap. 🫃 There’s nothing brave about being obese. 🤱 Two men can’t be a mother. Ever. 💊 The cure was always worse than the disease. 🍼 Abortion isn’t healthcare. It’s killing. 🎓 Indoctrination isn’t education. Period. 🔒 You can’t comply your way to freedom. 🧑‍🎓 Being offended is a choice. Deal with it. 👁️ “Conspiracy theorist” just means you noticed. 🧪 Science has been replaced by ideology. 📺 Mainstream media is the cancer of society. I don’t take sides, I expose lies. I stand for truth, not tribes. I’m not an influencer, I’ve got integrity. If that resonates, give me a follow. Let’s wake the rest up.

goddeketal
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 4:43 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Cancer screenings were canceled. Hospitals were “overwhelmed.” Kids lost years of development. Elderly people died alone, denied visits. Yet they had time to rehearse TikTok dances, while the public suffered under cruel, arbitrary, and tyrannical measures. NEVER FORGET! https://t.co/AJ26MhlzFH

goddeketal
Posted - March 23, 2025 at 11:47 PM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 5:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vitamin D proved essential during the pandemic, especially as many faced deficiencies due to various measures. I highlight several experts who dismissed its importance, including Neil Stone, Gavin Yamey, and others, each making questionable claims about vitamin D's effectiveness against COVID and other health issues. Their misunderstandings and mockery of nutrition's role in health are concerning. For those interested in learning more about vitamin D, I invite you to read my blog and a comprehensive article I wrote on the subject. Knowledge is power.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵 Vitamin D was a lifesaver during the “pandemic” — especially as more and more people became severely deficient due to arbitrary measures. Yet many “experts” claimed it was irrelevant. Time to expose them. A THREAD

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#1 Neil Stone (@DrNeilStone) says we don’t talk about vitamin D because it only works if you’re deficient. That’s… literally how vitamins work, Neil. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 Gavin Yamey (@GYamey) says Peter Hotez is a “national treasure” and calls people who promote vitamin D conspiracy theorists. Imagine simping this hard for a guy who dodges debates and shills for pharma. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 Klaas van Dijk (@KlaasvanDijk5) says vitamin D doesn’t work against Covid — while studies show people with levels above 50 ng/mL barely even got sick. Mixing bad science with random Earth facts? Impressive clownery. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4 Marc Veldhoen (@Marc_Veld), an actual professor of immunology, says vitamin D doesn’t work against COVID. Imagine teaching immunology and still not knowing that vitamin D is essential for immune function. You’d have to work really hard to be this blind. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld #5 Contrary to these clowns, Sunfluencer (@sunfluencer) has been right from the beginning. Follow @sunfluencer.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer #6 Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz (@GidMK), an Australian epidemiologist, says some vitamin D preprints were fake — so we should ignore the rest. Imagine being in public health and mocking the one vitamin that actually boosts immune resilience. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK #7 Raoul de Groot (@raouljdegroot) is a virologist who’s been simping for Drosten & Fauci since day one. This is the same guy who studied animal coronaviruses and still missed the part where human immunity needs vitamin D. The irony? He calls others wannabe experts. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK @raouljdegroot #8 Eric Topol (@EricTopol) says vitamin D doesn’t help prevent anything — not even COVID, heart disease, or cancer. Bold take from a guy who once called mRNA shots “miracles” while ignoring all the athletes dropping like flies. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK @raouljdegroot @EricTopol #9 Gavin Yamey (@GYamey) is back — now mocking the use of vitamin D and nutrition for autoimmune and mental health conditions. Imagine being in public health and laughing at the idea that nutrients affect human health. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK @raouljdegroot @EricTopol #10 Friedemann Weber (@Friedemann1), a virology professor, says vitamin D, ivermectin and the Great Barrington Declaration belong on a “scrap heap.” That’s what happens when your PhD is in viruses but you treat nutrients and early treatment like conspiracy theories. Next clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK @raouljdegroot @EricTopol @Friedemann1 #11 Atila Iamarino (@oatila), Brazil’s favorite lockdown cheerleader, mocks early treatment and vitamin D — right alongside welding smoke and beer vaccines. That’s what happens when a failed scientist becomes a Big Pharma whore. Last clown.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@Marc_Veld @sunfluencer @GidMK @raouljdegroot @EricTopol @Friedemann1 @oatila For those who want to learn more about vitamin D, feel free to read my Vitamin D blog on sunfluencer dot com — or check out this linked comprehensive (!!!) article that I wrote on the topic. Knowledge is power. https://brownstone.org/articles/vitamin-d-everything-you-need-to-know/

Vitamin D: Everything You Need to Know ⋆ Brownstone Institute Inadequate vitamin D3 intakes result in most having a 1/10 to 1/2 of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs to function properly. brownstone.org
goddeketal
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 11:30 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: JFK wanted to strip the CIA of its autonomy, force AIPAC (formerly AZC) to register as a foreign agent, block Israel’s nuclear ambitions, and challenge the Federal Reserve’s grip on U.S. currency. That’s why he was assassinated. https://t.co/DkEpGbxUWH

goddeketal
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new Brazilian study confirms that mask mandates did not prevent COVID-19 and may have even increased excess mortality. The obsession with masks led to the silencing of dissenting voices, but now academia is acknowledging this reality, albeit late. I believe it’s crucial for those who faced demonization, censorship, and job loss for speaking out to be fully vindicated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨NEW: Brazilian study confirms what we knew all along—mask mandates not only failed to stop COVID but may have actually contributed to excess mortality. The so-called “experts” pushed a cult-like obsession with masks, silencing anyone who dared to question them. Now, academia is quietly admitting the truth—far too late, but better late than never. It’s time for those who were demonized, censored, and fired for speaking the truth to be fully vindicated. Link to study: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-025-22172-x

Does mask usage correlate with excess mortality? Findings from 24 European countries - BMC Public Health Several nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as masking, were mandated or recommended during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study’s primary objective is to investigate the relationship between population-level mask usage and excess mortality across Europe. We collected data on mask usage and other relevant variables from 24 European countries during 2020-2021, a period in which mask policies varied widely across nations, providing an ideal basis for a natural experiment. To assess the association between mask usage and relevant medical and socioeconomic data at the country level, we conducted both bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. Confounding factors were accounted for in the regression models, and numerous sensitivity tests were performed to ensure robustness. Statistically significant correlations were found between mask usage rate and age-adjusted excess mortality in both bivariate (Spearman coefficient = 0.477, p = 0.018) and multivariate (Standardized coefficient = 0.52, p = 0.0012) regressions. Likewise, vaccination rates showed negative and significant bivariate (Spearman coefficient = -0.659, p < .001) and multivariate (Standardized coefficient = -0.48, p = 0.0016) correlations with age-adjusted excess mortality. No correlation was observed between mask usage rates and COVID-19 morbidity. However, significant associations were identified between mask usage rates, COVID-19 mortality, and excess deaths. Various hypotheses have been proposed to explain these associations, with thorough consideration given to potential confounders, such as socioeconomic factors and the severity of COVID-19 waves. bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
goddeketal
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 11:56 AM
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 9:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The ECB's Digital Euro is launching in October, raising significant concerns such as real-time transaction tracking, potential payment blocking, automatic tax deductions, restrictions on cash withdrawals, and programmable money with expiration dates. It feels like they couldn't persuade us willingly, so they're resorting to fear and likely a new crisis to impose this system. This seems like a financial Great Reset, aiming for total control over our purchases, movements, and even our diets. It's crucial to say no while we still have the chance.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨 BREAKING: The ECB’s Digital Euro is set to launch in October. Key concerns include: – Real-time transaction tracking – Potential for payment blocking – Automatic tax deductions – Restrictions on cash withdrawals – Programmable money with expiration dates They couldn’t convince us voluntarily, so now they’re using fear and most likely a new crisis to force this system upon us. This is nothing but a financial Great Reset, total control over what you buy, where you go, and even what you eat. SAY NO WHILE YOU STILL CAN!

Video Transcript AI Summary
I agree that nature abhors a vacuum. Our work on the digital euro began when I started five and a half years ago, though Benoit Curry had spoken on it before me. I continued the project, and later Fabio Panetta, and now Piero Cipollone, have taken the lead with a great team. We're speeding up and engaging with the European Parliament, Council, and Commission to realize the digital euro. Our deadline is October 2025, and we're preparing for it. However, we need the legislative process to be completed by the Commission, Council, and Parliament to proceed. This is crucial and increasingly vital, both wholesale and retail.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On your second point, I tend to share your views. Nature doesn't like vacuum. And we started working on on the digital euro way back, actually when I started my term five and a half years ago. And I'm not claiming parentality on the digital euro because my colleague, Benoit Curry, had already committed a speech on this matter before I arrived. But I certainly carried on with that project. And subsequently, Fabio Panetta on the board and then Piero Cipollone, who has replaced Fabio, have taken the lead together with a very, very good team, which is focused on accelerating the pace and hopefully campaigning enough with all the stakeholders, meaning European Parliament, meaning European Council, meaning European Commission, so that we can eventually, you know, not put to bed, but put to reality this digital euro. The deadline for us is going to be October of twenty five, and we are getting ready for that deadline. But we will not be able to move unless the other parties, the stakeholders, as I call them, commission, council and parliament, actually complete the legislative process without which we will not be able to move. And I think it is critically important, and it seems to the agnostic or the skeptics, it seems to be more relevant and more of an imperative now than ever before, both on the wholesale and on the retail level, both. And
goddeketal
Posted - March 2, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 6:07 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The CIA literally had a program called ‘Operation Mockingbird,’ where they recruited journalists to plant pro-government stories. That was decades ago. Do you really think they stopped? The mainstream media isn’t holding power accountable, they’re working for it. https://t.co/tF0crIZSqq

goddeketal
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 1:07 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 3:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on the stark contrasts in how society responded during the pandemic. While my grandma faced solitude in her final moments, a grand funeral was held for the Queen. I was threatened with jail for visiting family, and hospitals, supposedly overwhelmed, had staff engaging in TikTok dances. Small businesses suffered while large corporations thrived, and children were forced to endure harsh conditions. I witnessed censorship of dissenting voices and a push for compliance that felt tyrannical. Now, I’m told to forget it all, but I demand justice, not amnesty.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

They let your grandma die alone but threw a massive funeral for the Queen. They threatened you with jail for visiting your family. They told us hospitals were overflowing, yet nurses had time for TikTok dances. They closed churches but left liquor stores, strip clubs, and casinos open. They locked you in your home for months. They arrested people for walking alone on the beach. They shut down small businesses while Walmart and Amazon thrived. They forced children to eat outside in the cold, masked and distanced. They fired doctors and nurses who refused the jab while calling it a healthcare crisis. They forced toddlers to mask but let celebrities go mask-free at award shows. They told people to wear two masks, because one just wasn’t enough. They called you selfish for wanting to make your own medical choices. They refused organ transplants to people who didn’t get injected. They told people to have s3x with masks on or to use “glory holes” to “stop the spread.” They put arrows on supermarket floors to control “safe” walking directions. They censored and banned medical professionals for saying what’s now considered basic fact. They banned unvaccinated people from getting haircuts but let convicted felons get them in prison. They claimed the unvaccinated were the problem, but then said the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission. They silenced scientists while pushing Pfizer propaganda. They banned people from using cash because the virus “lives on surfaces”, but let them use the same credit card machine as everyone else. They demanded a QR code just to buy food. They said you deserved to die if you didn’t comply. They locked playgrounds with police tape, while letting massive Hollywood film productions continue. They told you your body, your choice, unless it was about an experimental shot. They called for camps for the unvaccinated. They told you the vaccine works, but only if everyone else takes it too. They bribed people with free donuts, burgers, and fries to get injected, while claiming to care about public health. They made you sit down in a restaurant to “stop the virus”, but standing up was apparently dangerous. They put curfews in place as if COVID only spread after 8 PM. They threatened jail time for walking in the park, but rioters and protesters were immune to the virus. They rewrote history and pretended none of this happened. And now, they’re telling me to move on and forget about the TYRANNY… NO AMNESTY. NO FORGIVENESS. ONLY JUSTICE.

goddeketal
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 12:10 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 3:18 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🚨We screamed this from the rooftops after reading the animal studies on mRNA shots. We knew what was coming. But instead of listening, they banned us, fired us, called us crazy, and even turned our own families against us. Now, the truth is out. And those responsible must pay! https://t.co/1ONqE16kYh

goddeketal
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Saved - February 15, 2025 at 9:37 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ Ever wonder why doctors know almost NOTHING about nutrition, herbs, the importance of sunshine, or holistic healing? Because one man, John D. Rockefeller, decided that only patented, oil-based drugs should exist. And he made it happen. Here’s how: 🧵👇 https://t.co/ZoAwsG4009

goddeketal
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:14 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I lost three jobs for speaking out against COVID tyranny, while those who pushed the mandates and discriminated against the unvaccinated still have theirs. It should have been the other way around. https://t.co/ZgVKEBHr0l

goddeketal
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 9:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Mark Zuckerberg recently revealed that the Biden administration pressured Facebook to remove memes and accurate vaccine information. While he portrays himself as a victim on Joe Rogan, I can't help but notice his silence during a time when many of us risked everything to stand up against the narrative. While we faced job losses and personal sacrifices for speaking the truth, Zuckerberg chose compliance over courage. Now that the narrative has shifted, he seeks sympathy, but he should be held accountable for his role in censorship. Some of us fought for truth; he did not.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Mark Zuckerberg just admitted that the Biden administration made them delete memes and vaccine information that turned out to be true. Let that sink in. Now, he’s on Joe Rogan playing the victim, saying it was “brutal” and that they “went after his companies.” But here’s the thing: unlike people like me, and many others who risked everything to stand up against the narrative, Mark stayed silent. While we fought back, lost jobs, businesses, and even relationships for speaking the truth, Zuckerberg complied like the spineless coward he is. People were censored, silenced, discriminated against, and yes, people died because of his cowardice. He could’ve stood up, but he chose his profits over principles. Now, he wants sympathy because the narrative shifted and it’s finally safe for him to talk. Sorry, Mark, no amnesty for you. You didn’t just go along with it—you were complicit in the government’s censorship. If he’s now admitting this crime, then he should be held accountable like anyone else. While the rest of us took the hits, Zuckerberg showed the world he had no courage to fight for truth when it mattered most. Some of us did the real work. Some of us had the balls. Zuckerberg didn’t.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration's team aggressively pressured us to remove content, often resorting to yelling and cursing. Despite their demands, we refused to take down truthful posts, including a meme about potential compensation for COVID vaccine recipients. We stood firm against removing humor and satire. Eventually, Biden publicly accused us of causing harm, which led to various government agencies investigating our company. The situation became extremely challenging for us.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people from the Biden administration would call up our team and, like, scream at them and curse. And it's like these documents are it's all kind of out there. Oh, do you record any of those phone calls? I don't no. I don't think I don't think we were But but I think I wanna listen. I mean, their emails the the the emails are published. It's all it's all kind of out there. And, and they're like and, basically, it just got to this point where we were like, no. We're we're not gonna we're not gonna take down things that are true. That's ridiculous. They want us to take down this meme of Leonardo DiCaprio looking at a TV talking about how 10 years from now or something, you know, you're gonna see an ad that says, okay. If you took a COVID vaccine, you're, eligible for you know, like, for for this kind of payment. Like, so this sort of, like, class action lawsuit type meme. And they're like, no. You have to take that down. And we said, no. We're not gonna we're not gonna take take down humor and satire. We're not gonna take down things that are that are true. And then at some point, I guess, I don't know. It flipped a bit. I mean, Biden, when he was he gave some statement at some point. I don't know if it was a press conference or to some journalist where he basically was like, these guys are killing people. And and, and I don't know. Then, like, all these different agencies and branches of government basically just, like, started investigating coming after our company. It was it was brutal. It was brutal. Wow.
goddeketal
Posted - December 30, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe this individual, likely a Chinese spy and saboteur, should face serious investigation, lose any influence, and be deported to China, where her authoritarian ideals can flourish under the regime she probably supports. Just putting it out there.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

This almost certainly Chinese spy and saboteur shouldn’t just be slammed online but aggressively investigated, stripped of any influence, and immediately deported to China—where her authoritarian fantasies can thrive under the regime she likely serves. https://t.co/ugyIQRksnT

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Just sayin’. https://t.co/gWSJmVyTts

goddeketal
Posted - December 26, 2024 at 2:33 PM
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 9:15 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The prophets of the climate cult, @algore and @JohnKerry, swore up and down that the polar ice caps would vanish by 2014. Spoiler alert: they’re still here. https://t.co/5TrIDHXKlC

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a 75% chance that the North Polar ice cap could be completely ice-free during summer months within the next 5 to 7 years. The melting sea ice is exposing more of the Arctic Ocean, and scientists predict that in 5 years, we will experience the first ice-free Arctic summer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a 75% chance that the entire North Polar ice cap during summer during some of the summer months could be completely ice free within the next 5 to 7 years. Speaker 1: You have sea ice, which is melting at a rate that the Arctic Ocean now increasingly is exposed. In 5 years, scientists predict we will have the 1st ice free Arctic summer.
goddeketal
Posted - September 11, 2023 at 12:50 PM
Saved - December 24, 2024 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Shortly after AA77 allegedly hit the Pentagon, the FBI seized all surveillance footage. A video obtained through a lawsuit suggests that a missile, not a plane, struck the building. This raises several questions for me: What did the US government know, and why did they bomb the Pentagon? What happened to AA77 and its passengers? How can people still trust the official narrative? Given the US elite's willingness to harm millions, as seen during Covid, it seems plausible they would sacrifice a few thousand for what they perceive as the greater good.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Shortly after AA77 allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, the FBI confiscated all surveillance videos. In the video obtained through a lawsuit by @JudicialWatch, you can see that no plane crashed into the Pentagon, but rather a missile. The questions that arise for me are as follows: ▪️What did the US government know, and why did they bomb the Pentagon? ▪️What happened to AA77, especially to the people on board? ▪️How can people still believe the official version? The US elite doesn’t hesitate to harm millions of people (see Covid); why would they hesitate to kill a few thousand countrymen for “the greater good”?

goddeketal
Posted - December 15, 2024 at 12:45 PM
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 11:30 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Oh look, red meat is healthy after all. Been screaming this from the rooftops for years! https://t.co/xxLAOLa4Zh

goddeketal
Posted - December 15, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 9:18 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Klaus Schwab's father, Eugen Schwab, was a Nazi. They were defeated once, and they'll be defeated again. https://t.co/nlRVkpEGGP

goddeketal
Posted - December 12, 2024 at 4:00 AM
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 3:49 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

This is the #1 doctor-recommended baby formula. The first five ingredients are: ▪️Corn Syrup Solids - WTF? ▪️Soy Protein Isolate - no wonder boys think they're girls ▪️High Oleic Safflower Oil - WTF? ▪️Sucrose - WTF? ▪️Soy Oil - WTF? Why would someone give this to their newborn? https://t.co/eiu2j8YAI3

goddeketal
Posted - December 14, 2024 at 4:05 PM
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 5:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noticing that the same scientists who seem confused about various issues, like Sweden's lack of lockdown collapse and the effectiveness of natural immunity, are also puzzled by climate data and basic biological facts. Perhaps it's time for them to embrace honesty instead of bafflement.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

The same scientists who were ‘baffled’ here are also baffled why: – Sweden didn’t collapse without lockdowns, – their COVID models were laughably wrong, – natural immunity actually works, – the polar caps aren’t melting, – sea levels aren’t rising as predicted, – polar bear populations are increasing, – men can’t get pregnant, – and why two genders just won’t go away. Maybe it’s time they stop being ‘baffled’ and start being honest.

goddeketal
Posted - December 14, 2024 at 2:00 PM
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 3:09 PM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Hey, @DrMaryTBassett – you certainly don’t deserve any kind of amnesty. https://t.co/wSZiWrEsx3

View Full Interactive Feed