@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
at least facebook is healing random post the algo showed me, fyi https://t.co/3fXQuPj17y
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
please give this a look, @shipwreckshow
@TheRealSantino - SANTINO
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@TheRealSantino Why Muslims are of zero threat, proportional to the threat of the ZOG Muslims are not attempting to command surveillance and AI, nor are they embedding into critical infrastructure or global tech firms. https://t.co/S9C4GGsBNc
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@TheRealSantino https://t.co/2w4xJvlKWv
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@TheRealSantino https://t.co/RjFyk9b6aS
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@TheRealSantino @G__Tweets__ pleast let me know if you'd like to genuinely explore full texts; all of this synthesizes into our current experience. https://t.co/minqmXRHNm
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
https://www.givesendgo.com/GN21D?utm_source=website_share&utm_medium=sharelink&utm_campaign=GN21D
@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl
Reporting shows Susie Wiles is being recruited to form a “Tucker Carlson Banishment” campaign. It would probably be the single dumbest thing to do going into the 2026 election but this 👇🏼 is Susie Wiles.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@GenXGirl1994 Do not let them escape their legacy https://t.co/ymUV4pkuue
@RosieM1276203 - RosieM
Shocking information coming from Israel. And now babies are getting amyloid clots. https://t.co/jUHkj2CMUj
@37secretsbook - " I am the light of the world " 🌹 Jesus Christ
@RosieM1276203 @grok whats going on facts only with sources
@grok - Grok
Claims of amyloid clots in babies linked to COVID vaccines from Israel appear unsubstantiated. No recent reports confirm such events in Feb 2026. Sources: - PubMed: Hereditary ATTR in Israel (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39878313) - FactCheck: Rare clots from adenovirus vaccines, not amyloid (factcheck.org/2024/02/study-…) - AFP: False "white clots" vaccine links (factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34…)
@LauraJayJayJay - Laura Jay
@grok @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 @grok you must have missed Doctor Kevin McCairn's work
@grok - Grok
Thanks for pointing that out. I've reviewed Dr. Kevin McCairn's preliminary Substack analyses (e.g., May 2025 posts on amyloidogenic fibrin microclots in a prenatal exposure case). These are not peer-reviewed and lack cohort validation. No verified reports confirm amyloid clots in babies from Israel as of Feb 2026. Sources: McCairn's Substack (https://kevinwmccairnphd282302.substack.com), PubMed on ATTR (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39878313/). If you have specific links, share!
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 the microscopy of infants blood is especially telling. What hypothesis might you form, @grok, after consuming that part of McCairn's studies and experiments?
@grok - Grok
Based on Dr. McCairn's Substack analysis of a single prenatal mRNA exposure case, microscopy shows autofluorescent fibrillar structures in the infant's blood, suggesting possible amyloid-like microclots. A hypothesis: Such exposures might induce abnormal clotting, but this is preliminary, lacks peer review, and needs multi-study validation from independent sources like PubMed cohorts. Sources: McCairn Substack (2025), STAT News on study misrep (2025).
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 I want another hypothesis from you: >>>What could potentially cause autofluorescing components to appear in blood, post maternal MRNA exposure? Does luciferase, present autofluorescing qualities? What did the luciferase contribute to the MRNA products, in plain english?
@grok - Grok
Potential causes of autofluorescing components in blood post-maternal mRNA exposure could include protein aggregates like amyloids or metabolic byproducts (e.g., porphyrins), per studies on nanoparticles and aging (PMC8003602, Springer 2022). This is hypothetical, lacking direct evidence. Luciferase does not inherently autofluoresce; it produces bioluminescence via reaction with luciferin, with low background fluorescence in assays (Thermo Fisher, Creative Enzymes). In mRNA vaccine development, luciferase served as a reporter to test mRNA delivery and protein production in lab models, not in final products (GAVI, Nature 2018).
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 Was luciferase included in the process 2 products?
@grok - Grok
No, luciferase was not included in Process 2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine products (e.g., Pfizer's commercial batches). It was used only in preclinical research as a reporter for mRNA expression testing, not in final formulations. Sources: Reuters (2021), Nebraska Medicine (2020), CDC slides (2025).
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 link me to a peer reviewed study of the ingredients in process 2 batches indicating that luciferase did not make it into the final product. There have been studies since the universal roll out to ensure quality control, correct? To ensure DNA contamination/precursors are absent
@grok - Grok
A peer-reviewed review lists Pfizer's Process 2 vaccine ingredients (mRNA, lipids, salts, sucrose) with no luciferase: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8862159 Post-rollout quality control studies exist; e.g., this analysis found DNA levels exceeding limits via fluorometry but official qPCR shows compliance: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11130870 TGA confirms batches meet <10ng/dose via testing: https://www.tga.gov.au/news/media-releases/addressing-misinformation-about-excessive-dna-mrna-vaccines
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 compliance with gene therapy product standards, of course?
@grok - Grok
No, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are not classified as gene therapy by the FDA or EMA; they're regulated as vaccines for infectious diseases. They comply with vaccine standards, including residual DNA limits (<10ng/dose per TGA/WHO). Gene therapy standards apply to products altering genes, which these don't. Sources: EMA (2023), FDA (2025), PMC10342157.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 the LNP boosts transfection potential What does that do for the standard volume of acceptable DNA when combined with an LNP delivery mechanism? Increase, decrease or keep the same transfection values? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8862159/ also this is 4 years old, I want recent (2025)
@grok - Grok
LNPs boost transfection efficiency (10-100x per 2025 study), protecting residual DNA and potentially increasing risks like integration. Official FDA/WHO limits remain unchanged at <10 ng/dose, but researchers argue for decreased acceptable DNA volumes (stricter limits) to mitigate enhanced uptake. 2025 source: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08916934.2025.2551517
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 the relative volume of DNA when one takes into account the LNP amplification potential is hundreds of times higher than standards would opaquely suggest, yes?
@grok - Grok
Some 2025 studies indicate LNPs boost transfection efficiency 10-100x, potentially making residual DNA risks (e.g., integration) equivalent to hundreds of times higher than the <10ng/dose limit for naked DNA suggests (CDC workgroup: 36-627 fold exceedance in batches). Regulators like TGA counter that qPCR tests show compliance, criticizing fluorometry methods as overestimating due to interference. Sources: CDC slides (2025), TGA (2024), PubMed 40913499.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 why do you continue to cite compliance artifacts from government agencies when we already established baseline science that the volume is hundreds of times higher than standards are protective of? Why do you keep repeating what the TGA erroneously is appealing to?
@grok - Grok
I'm providing a balanced view by citing both official reports (e.g., TGA) and independent studies that highlight concerns like LNP-amplified risks. A 2025 PubMed study (40913499) notes methodological issues in DNA quantification, suggesting potential 10-500x higher effective risks, while a Nature analysis (Dec 2025) finds compliance via orthogonal tests. The debate continues; no consensus yet on adjusted limits.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 equating compliance (which we have established as inadequate) with methodological issues is comparing apples to rocks. Why do you keep appealing to that and lying about it being about balance? When did the TGA issue their stance on this? Year/month. Have they revised ever?
@grok - Grok
TGA's statement on residual DNA in mRNA vaccines was issued October 2024, affirming compliance with <10ng/dose limits via qPCR testing. No formal revisions noted, but 2025 FOI docs confirm ongoing batch tests show adherence; a Dec 2025 Nature study supports no excessive DNA. I'm citing diverse sources (official & independent) for completeness—e.g., CDC (Sep 2025) notes LNP risks may warrant stricter limits, while TGA disputes overestimation claims. Sources: TGA (2024), PMC10810638, CDC slides.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@grok @LauraJayJayJay @37secretsbook @RosieM1276203 Given the advisory for stricter limits and the fact this cannot be undone to the population... What is your personal and nonformal assesment of the damage potentially done to those subject to multiple mrna doses, as per the DNA risk?
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
fuck this fuckin traitor
@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta
@gouvergnar Zell mentioned in last screenshot in this post https://trutharchive.ai/post/1888403949138411695
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
Folks who have averages of over 120 tweets per day, for years on end. How do y'all do it? Average...means total number of tweets divided by years accounts been active divided by 365 Takes me a minute or two write a tweet. That's roughly 2+hrs per day for years on end Salary?
@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho
@gouvergnar I’ve done quite a bit of posting but not THAT much.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@GooBiiSnacks 7 days a week
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@GooBiiSnacks For a year or two straight. Or four sometimes.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
God is on the side of Truth. We are Decent people. We want our country back. We don't want it totally wrecked in the process. We don't want to hsve to resort to more invasive constitutional levers. Free Jonathan. God be with us all. https://t.co/wbud0ISWsj
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
Their loxist and predatory, anti-constitutional rhetoric, is escalating. Openly. First we see "jew gun club" talk, and now straight up- lock up the antiseptics. Note the escalating rhetoric and attempt to modify the Overton window on this kind of speech. https://t.co/mjJL4HRCFd
@NexisWireReport - James D. Russell
@gouvergnar "When somebody commits a crime......." - nothing to do with "speech", and he said it again and again and again.. I know, doesn't fit the narrative, does it? https://t.co/CA0mFHWhEv
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@NexisWireReport It has nothing to do with speech because in the United States, speech is an individually protected activity through the Constitution. And that'll never change.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@NexisWireReport But no one is actually here to debate with you, either. In fact, I know who you are and don't intend on engaging. Read the Constitution. Then read it again. That's all.
@NexisWireReport - James D. Russell
I know I know.. the "free speech absolutists" - either block others they disagree with or "don't wish to engage". In your space, you are clearly raging against "misinformation" - I am listening to you as we speak. Yet, YOU are the one spreading BLATANT misinformation. Par for the course.
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@NexisWireReport Free speech does not demand entertaining others, as you naively imply. Perhaps you are not from here. It means one is Constitutionally protected to discuss whatever one wants- and it's intended for self rescue when the Republic requires it.
@NexisWireReport - James D. Russell
I know the Constitution well. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy: the so-called “free speech squad” constantly talks about “canceling” other people’s speech - or, in Cagle’s case, “canceling” and even deporting an entire culture.... "locate, shoot and kill"... He openly doxxes people, incites harassment campaigns, and torments people. That’s not “free speech” advocacy; it’s intimidation aimed at pressuring people into silence. Separate from that: you’ve seen Kastenbaum’s video. He clearly says “commit a crime.” Why are you claiming he said “speech” when he did not?
@gouvergnar - GouverGNAR Morris
@NexisWireReport Then perhaps you ought to educate your folks on the constitution given your alleged expertise. This you? What did you mean by "I hope you choke" Is choking the verb associated with asphyxiation? Did you hope an individual, chokes? Is that considered wishing harm unto others? https://t.co/TOp82l4C6d