TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

LarryTaunton
Posted - April 26, 2023 at 5:52 PM
Saved - May 6, 2023 at 8:22 PM

@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton

World Economic Forum “Agenda Contributor” Dr. Dennis Meadow says we need: • To reduce the global population to less than 2 billion “peacefully” • A global “dictatorship” This is why I went to Davos. #Globalists are dangerous and must be stopped.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They hope for a civil and peaceful decline in population, where conflict is resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1-2 billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could support 8-9 billion people, but that is not desirable. The speaker hopes for a slow and relatively equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few rich individuals forcing others to deal with it. These hopes are seen as pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are so far, goby, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, that we can the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people. Maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. We could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, trying to force everybody else to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
wideawake_media
Posted - August 18, 2023 at 2:17 PM
Saved - August 19, 2023 at 1:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2015 speech, former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad warned of a globalist plan to reduce the world population to one billion. He suggested methods like mass killings, starvation, and birth prevention. For more content, visit wide-awake-media.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking in 2015, former Malaysian prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, warned of the globalist plan to reduce the global population down to one billion. "There will be a need to kill many billions of people, or to starve them to death, or to prevent them from giving birth, in order to reduce the population of this world." Full speech: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UGRkQiLxi3Q… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of a new world order, where a single world government led by wealthy and powerful elites would govern the entire world. The focus is on abolishing states, nations, and borders, and imposing rules on everyone. The video highlights the use of military force and propaganda to enforce this new order, including regime change in non-compliant countries. Sanctions are mentioned as a means of punishment, and the intention to reduce the world's population is discussed. The video concludes by suggesting that the peace achieved through this new world order would be akin to the peace of the graveyard.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The subject is the new world order. It is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, all nations, all borders, but instead have only 1 world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites, People who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways, they are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or choice of leaders. Instead, There was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world. And for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment. So we find that already there is a new world government enforced with powerful military forces and a willingness to subvert and undermine the governments of all countries. Politically, We see them urging every country to undergo regime change except for those who are already submitting to them. There must be regime change so that All governments in this world would submit to this world power, this world government. And if you refuse to change your government, you will be persuaded through propaganda, through actions including invasion and occupation, and the removal of the hate of that government to be replaced by one that submits to the most powerful nation. In other words, the one who will accept the concept of a new world order. But that is not all. We find that if you are recalcitrant, You don't like to conform. Then you may have sanctions placed against you. We see already countries like Iran and Russia facing the application of sanctions on their trade with other countries. We see all kinds of subversion taking place, undermining our moral values to the extent that we become helpless, unable to do anything. And the peace that we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the new world order was enunciated, the population of this world was only 3,000,000,000. The intention was to reduce it to 1,000,000,000. Now the population of the world is 7,000,000,000. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most, for those who will suffer and die. There will be the peace of the grave.
wideawake_media
Posted - August 18, 2023 at 2:55 PM
Saved - August 19, 2023 at 3:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of Earth to one billion, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer individuals, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Prominent Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of Planet Earth, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are currently consuming and populating the planet at unsustainable levels. I believe that this will eventually lead to a decline, and I hope it can happen peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support a billion or two billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. However, smart dictatorships with low living standards could support even more people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience rather than a few wealthy individuals forcing others to deal with it. These hopes may seem pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But,
wideawake_media
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 2:49 PM
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 7:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2015 speech, former Malaysian PM Mahathir Mohamad warned about a globalist plan to reduce the world population to one billion. He suggested methods like mass killings, starvation, and birth prevention. For more content, visit wide-awake-media.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking in 2015, former Malaysian prime minister, Mahathir Mohamad, warned us about the globalist plan to reduce the global population down to one billion people. "There will be a need to kill many billions of people, or to starve them to death, or to prevent them from giving birth, in order to reduce the population of this world." Full speech: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UGRkQiLxi3Q… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the concept of a new world order, where a single world government would be established by a group of wealthy and powerful elites. The idea is to abolish all states and borders, with these elites imposing their rules on everyone. Those who resist would face punishment, including propaganda, invasion, occupation, and sanctions. The ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. The video suggests that this new world order would bring a false sense of peace, but at the cost of suffering and death for many.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The subject is the new world order. It is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, all nations, all borders, but instead have only 1 world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites, People who are very rich, very intelligent, very powerful in many ways, they are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy or choice of leaders. Instead, There was to be a government by these elites who will impose their rules on everyone in this world. And for those who are unwilling to submit to them, there will be punishment. So we find that already there is a new world government enforced with powerful military forces and a willingness to subvert and undermine the governments of all countries. Politically, We see them urging every country to undergo regime change except for those who are already submitting to them. There must be regime change so that All governments in this world would submit to this world power, this world government. And if you refuse to change your government, you will be persuaded through propaganda, through actions including invasion and occupation, and the removal of the hate of that government to be replaced by one that submits to the most powerful nation. In other words, the one who will accept the concept of a new world order. But that is not all. We find that if you are recalcitrant, You don't like to conform. Then you may have sanctions placed against you. We see already countries like Iran and Russia facing the application of sanctions on their trade with other countries. We see all kinds of subversion taking place, undermining our moral values to the extent that we become helpless, unable to do anything. And the peace that we will get from this is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people in this world. At the time when the new world order was enunciated, the population of this world was only 3,000,000,000. The intention was to reduce it to 1,000,000,000. Now the population of the world is 7,000,000,000. There will be a need to kill many billions of people or to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth in order to reduce the population of this world. This is what is in store for most, for those who will suffer and die. There will be the peace of the grave.
wideawake_media
Posted - September 10, 2023 at 9:37 AM
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 10:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer people, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate even eight or nine billion. Source: youtu.be/Dbo6uvJBtZg. For similar content, visit wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are currently consuming and populating the planet at unsustainable levels. I believe that this will eventually lead to a decline, and I hope it can happen peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. However, smart dictatorships with low living standards could support even more people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline in population, avoiding a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. These hopes may seem pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But,
wideawake_media
Posted - September 14, 2023 at 11:57 AM
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 12:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sadhguru, a contributor to the World Economic Forum, has sparked controversy by suggesting that reducing the human population is necessary to address global issues. He proposes having fewer children and more dogs to decrease our impact on the planet. This viewpoint has raised concerns and ignited debates. For more details, visit wideawakemedia.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Fake spiritual guru and World Economic Forum "agenda contributor", Sadhguru, openly advocates depopulating the planet, going on to suggest that people should have dogs instead of children. "I was in a conference and I said: 'Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything'. Then they asked me a brilliant question: 'How do you reduce the human footprint?'. I said: 'You have to reduce the number of feet. That's the only way'." Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20200521085531/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkWFCy3xWFw&feature=youtu.be… https://youtube.com/watch?v=6RMHJM-Qr5A… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the Economic Forum, a speaker addressed population concerns, acknowledging the reluctance of others to discuss the issue. They emphasized the need for fewer people on the planet, as the current population of 7.3 billion is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050. The speaker suggested reducing the human footprint by limiting the number of children. They highlighted the importance of insects and worms for the planet's survival, stating that if they disappear, the planet will be destroyed. Ultimately, the speaker concluded that the planet would flourish if humans were to disappear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the session we just attended here at the Economic Forum, I think there was a sense of relief actually in your frankness. You brought up some issues that others are reluctant to bring up. That's my story. Always. Speaker 1: All the religious groups are against me because I'm talking About population, they want more souls. I want less on the planet. Speaker 2: For example, I'm picking on agriculture because it is the biggest land user and also biggest water user on the planet. The way The way we eat is ecologically disastrous. The way we dress is ecologically disastrous because the 3rd largest polluter on the Planet is textiles. Most people don't know this. So everything that we do has become violent in the world, the very way we exist. Speaker 1: In the beginning of 20th century we were just about 1,500,000,000 people. Today we are 7,300,000,000 people. The United Nations making predictions that by 2050 We will be 9,700,000,000 people. 9,700,000,000 people or nearly 10,000,000,000 people on this planet It's for sure going to be a disaster. I was in a conference and, I said, see unless you Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything. Then they asked me a brilliant question, how do you reduce the human footprint?' I said, you have to reduce the number of feet.' That's the only way we can take it upon ourselves That we will not push the human population. You can have a dog. I am not saying children are bad, they are wonderful, But it's just too many. We as human beings, we are wonderful, but we are too many. We are so many that the insect population is going down. No, no, it's not a joke. It's very it's very threatening. If the insect population disappears, the planet will be destroyed. Yes. The worms disappear, the planet will be destroyed. If you and me disappear, planet will flourish.
wideawake_media
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 9:59 AM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 3:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, reducing today's population by 87.5%. The planet can sustain up to two billion people, depending on liberty and material consumption. More liberty and consumption require fewer people, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. Check out the best-selling T-shirt collection at wideawakeclothing.com (discount code: TWITTER15).

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that having more liberty and consumption requires fewer people, while a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate a larger population. However, the speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom and a high standard of living. They hope for a slow and relatively equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. The speaker admits that these hopes may be pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

T-shirt available here: https://wideawake.clothing/collections/best-sellers-tshirts?filter.v.price.gte=&filter.v.price.lte=&sort_by=best-selling Use discount code 'TWITTER15' for 15% off (first 20 customers only)!

Best Sellers (T-Shirts) Some of our best selling t-shirts. Click here for our best selling hoodies. wideawake.clothing
DiedSuddenly_
Posted - September 30, 2023 at 2:26 AM
Saved - September 30, 2023 at 9:19 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Jane Goodall thinks the world would be better if the population were reduced by 90%. Why would she say this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Human population growth is a significant issue that cannot be ignored. It is the root cause of many other problems we face today. If the population size was the same as it was 500 years ago, the problems we discuss would not exist.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
wideawake_media
Posted - September 30, 2023 at 10:53 AM
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 3:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sadhguru, a contributor to the WEF agenda, suggests reducing the human footprint by having fewer children. He humorously states that the only way to achieve this is by reducing the number of feet. His controversial remarks have sparked debate. For more content, visit wideawakemediacom.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Fake spiritual guru and WEF "agenda contributor", Sadhguru, openly advocates depopulating the planet, going on to suggest that people should have dogs instead of children. "I was in a conference and I said: 'Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything'. Then they asked me a brilliant question: 'How do you reduce the human footprint?'. I said: 'You have to reduce the number of feet. That's the only way'." Sources: https://web.archive.org/web/20200521085531/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkWFCy3xWFw&feature=youtu.be… https://youtube.com/watch?v=6RMHJM-Qr5A… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a session at the Economic Forum, the speaker addressed important issues that others tend to avoid. They discussed the negative impact of overpopulation and how it affects various aspects of our lives. The speaker emphasized that our current way of living, including agriculture and textile production, is ecologically disastrous. They highlighted the alarming increase in the global population and the potential consequences it may bring. The speaker suggested that reducing the human footprint is crucial, even if it means having fewer children. They also warned about the threat to the planet if insect and worm populations continue to decline. Ultimately, the speaker concluded that the planet would thrive without humans, but not without insects and worms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the session we just attended here at the Economic Forum, I think there was a sense of relief actually in your frankness. You brought up some issues that others are reluctant to bring up. That's my story. Always. Speaker 1: All the religious groups are against me because I'm talking About population, they want more souls. I want less on the planet. Speaker 2: For example, I'm picking on agriculture because it is the biggest land user and also biggest water user on the planet. The way The way we eat is ecologically disastrous. The way we dress is ecologically disastrous because the 3rd largest polluter on the Planet is textiles. Most people don't know this. So everything that we do has become violent in the world, the very way we exist. Speaker 1: In the beginning of 20th century we were just about 1,500,000,000 people. Today we are 7,300,000,000 people. The United Nations making predictions that by 2050 We will be 9,700,000,000 people. 9,700,000,000 people or nearly 10,000,000,000 people on this planet It's for sure going to be a disaster. I was in a conference and, I said, see unless you Unless you reduce the human footprint on the planet, there is no solution for anything. Then they asked me a brilliant question, how do you reduce the human footprint?' I said, you have to reduce the number of feet.' That's the only way we can take it upon ourselves That we will not push the human population. You can have a dog. I am not saying children are bad, they are wonderful, But it's just too many. We as human beings, we are wonderful, but we are too many. We are so many that the insect population is going down. No, no, it's not a joke. It's very it's very threatening. If the insect population disappears, the planet will be destroyed. Yes. The worms disappear, the planet will be destroyed. If you and me disappear, planet will flourish.
wideawake_media
Posted - October 1, 2023 at 9:59 AM
Saved - October 1, 2023 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
UN Messenger of Peace Jane Goodall emphasizes the need to address global population growth. She suggests reducing the population to 450 million, a 95% decrease from today. Goodall believes many problems stem from overpopulation, which didn't exist 500 years ago. Source: [YouTube link]. For more content, visit [website]. #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we discuss would not be as significant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
wideawake_media
Posted - October 18, 2023 at 9:41 AM
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 4:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned primatologist Jane Goodall, speaking at the World Economic Forum, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, a drastic 95% decrease. Goodall believes that overpopulation is at the root of numerous global issues. She argues that addressing this problem is crucial for resolving other pressing challenges.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population. "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
We should reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it contributes to many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, many of the challenges we face today would not exist.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then, finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if There was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
wideawake_media
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 1:13 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 8:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Renowned primatologist and UN "Messenger of Peace," Jane Goodall, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, a drastic 95% decrease. Goodall emphasizes that population growth lies at the root of numerous global issues. She believes that reverting to the population size of 500 years ago would alleviate many of the challenges we face today.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle and animal feed production in intensive farms. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it is the root cause of many other problems. If our population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we face today would not be as significant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then, finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if There was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
JimFergusonUK
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 4:20 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 9:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The rising concerns over depopulation are linked to the World Economic Forum's initiatives, raising questions about their global agendas. Whistle-blower Barry Young suggests a potential connection between Covid vaccines and increased mortality, prompting an investigation. Comparisons to Nazi ideology highlight the dangers of elitism in globalism. The devaluation of human life and disregard for ethics are reminiscent of the Nazis. We must challenge elitist notions and prioritize empathy and ethics in population and resource challenges. The infiltration of globalist groups into governments threatens sovereignty and democratic principles. Concentrated power in global entities undermines local needs and voices. The World Economic Forum's influence raises concerns about undemocratic decision-making.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Are the elitists really looking to reduce the Global population by 6 Billion people? Beyond Boundaries: The Perilous Intersection of Global Elitism and Population Control. The rising concerns about the ideology of depopulation are increasingly linked to the World Economic Forum's (WEF) initiatives, sparking debates over the implications of their global agendas and the potential impact on world population dynamics. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/LarryTaunton/status/1732037113254707512?s=20 In response to alarming revelations emerging from New Zealand, whistle-blower Barry Young has brought to light information that suggests a potentially disturbing connection between the Covid Vaccines and an unprecedented increase in all-cause mortality and excess deaths. This revelation raises urgent questions about the possibility of a sinister agenda by certain global entities. Could there be an intentional effort to significantly reduce the world's population under the guise of public health measures? Such a scenario necessitates a thorough and unbiased investigation into the implications of these findings and their potential global impact. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731365553632055464?s=20 As we navigate the complex and often murky waters of the global population control debate, it's crucial to contextualize this discussion within the broader historical narrative, particularly the chilling parallels with the ideologies espoused by the Nazis. This comparison not only highlights the dangers of elitist attitudes in modern globalism but also serves as a stark reminder of humanity's potential for darkness. The notion of population control, as advocated by figures like Dr. Dennis Meadows, who desires a peaceful and equitable reduction, superficially appears humane. Yet, beneath the surface of these propositions, there lurks a shadow of elitism, reminiscent of the most sinister chapters in human history. Meadows' statement, "I hope that population can be reduced peacefully, in a fair way that everyone can participate in the experience," though seemingly benign, inadvertently echoes a mindset that can quickly spiral into dangerous territory. This is where the haunting specter of Nazi ideology becomes relevant. The Nazis, driven by a perverted sense of elitism and superiority, embarked on one of the most horrific genocides in history, systematically exterminating millions whom they deemed 'unworthy' or 'inferior.' Their actions were underpinned by a chilling belief in racial purity and a deluded view of social engineering, which they believed would lead to an improved human race. The parallels between this and the contemporary rhetoric of elitism in globalist circles, where certain individuals deem themselves fit to decide the fate of populations, are unnervingly clear. Attempts to silence whistle-blower Barry Young.⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1731632653290344862?s=20 The psychology behind such elitist views, whether in the context of Nazi Germany or modern globalism, reveals a disturbing willingness to devalue human life. This mindset, which reduces individuals to mere variables in a demographic equation, is dangerously akin to the dehumanizing policies of the Nazis. It reflects a lack of empathy and a disregard for the sanctity of human life, where people are categorized and valued based on arbitrary criteria set by a self-proclaimed elite. The moral implications of drawing parallels between the elitism in globalism and Nazi ideology are profound. They force us to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the ease with which a sense of superiority can lead to the justification of atrocities. This historical context serves as a warning of the potential consequences when extreme views on population control are allowed to go unchecked. Moving forward, it is essential to challenge the elitist notions within globalist agendas, advocating for an approach to population and resource challenges that respects human dignity and rights. Solutions must be grounded in empathy and ethics, not in cold calculations or the arrogant presumption of a select few. The lessons from history, especially the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis, must inform our approach, ensuring that respect for every human life remains at the forefront of our global discourse. Why did Jacinda Ardern exempt 11,000 politicians and doctors from getting the vaccine in secret?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709827142148628638?s=20 We must not forget the involvement in one of the most influential Globalist movements namely the World Economic Forum led by Chairman Klaus Schwab. The infiltration of globalist groups into national governments poses significant risks, fundamentally threatening the sovereignty and democratic principles of nations. Such a scenario can lead to the erosion of local governance and the prioritization of international agendas over national interests. This shift of power can dilute the voices and needs of local populations, as policies are increasingly influenced by a global elite with their own set of priorities and objectives. Moreover, the concentration of power in the hands of a few global entities increases the risk of unchecked, undemocratic decision-making, potentially leading to policies that are not in the best interest of the citizens they are meant to serve. This not only undermines democratic values but also jeopardizes the cultural, social, and economic well-being of nations, creating a global landscape where the diversity of local needs and voices are overshadowed by a homogenized global agenda. Is the World Economic Forum a dangerous death cult?⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1709159686325367167?s=20 #DepopulationAgenda #WEF2030Agenda #NewZealand #CovidVaccinations #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths #Myocarditus #SuddenDeath #DiedSuddenly #JacindaArdern #KlausSchwab

@LarryTaunton - Larry Alex Taunton

Abortion – The #1 DEPOPULATION TACTIC In this episode of ‘Ideas Have Consequences,’ we’ll discuss how many have weaponized morality to use abortion as a political ploy and expose the hidden agenda behind it—depopulation. This is the primary objective of the WEF Agenda.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the issue of abortion and the debate within the Republican Party about whether to continue making it a central tenet. They argue against abandoning the pro-life stance and emphasize the importance of standing firm on the issue. The speaker also highlights the influence of the World Economic Forum and their agenda of depopulation. They criticize the idea of compromising on abortion and urge for a clear articulation of principles and a fight for what is right. The speaker concludes by stating that a nation that destroys its children invites the wrath of God.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We become so desensitized to abortion that we forget what it really is. We don't speak of it in terms of a holocaust, but that's what it is. I hope it can be done peacefully. I hope it can be done in a fair way that Everyone could participate in the experience. What is the experience? The annihilation of the world population, reducing it by a minimum of 6,000,000,000 people according to doctor Dennis Meadows. This is central to World Economic Forum thinking, and that is influencing what's going on in the United States. Hunt on this issue? No. Now this was to I don't know who took this video. Whoever he is, I'm very grateful for him, because he's exposing a lot of evil. But here he is. He's he's videoing right outside an abortion clinic, and this abortion doctor comes up to talk to him. Let's Let's listen to this. Speaker 1: Friends, I pray. Sir, you gotta repent, sir. Speaker 2: Stay here. Speaker 1: You gotta repent, sir, for murdering babies. Why? Why? Because it's a sin before God. Speaker 2: Why? Well Stinky breath. Yeah. Speaker 1: Why? It's pretty it's pretty evil of you, sir. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And then I hope and pray that you Speaker 1: Well, that's what you do to babies. Speaker 2: Yeah. I love it. Speaker 1: You love it. Speaker 2: Yeah. I do. Speaker 1: Okay. I hope that you come to Christ, sir. Speaker 2: Oh, I'd never go to Christ. Speaker 1: I hope that you come to Christ. Speaker 2: No. I don't go to Christ. Yeah. You I don't listen to Christ. Speaker 1: You you have a darkened heart, sir. Speaker 2: I do have a hard a darkened heart. Yeah. Speaker 1: You have a darkened heart? Speaker 2: I do. I do very, very much. Speaker 1: And you will stand before God in judgment day Speaker 2: on the day. Everyday. Speaker 1: You will stand before God in judgment? Speaker 2: Yes. I will. Everyday. All of the babies that you have, you know. I love it. Yeah. Keep tearing the babies. Yeah. I will. Keep tearing the babies apart. I will. That is the thing. Speaker 1: Keep keep tearing the babies apart. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Yes, sir. The babies their blood Dreams from the ground. Speaker 0: It's an astonishing video. It's a disturbing video. Here is this abortion doctor. Not ashamed. Not at all. He's celebrating the murdering of unborn children. I love it, he says in a voice that sounds demonic. I never go to Christ. I have a darkened heart. This is what he says. This is like something out of a, out of a horror movie, except it's far worse than a horror movie because horror movies are fake. I mean, they're they're made up stories. We make up stories about, you know, the is it Jason who wears the hockey mask, you know, comes after everybody. Freddy Krueger with his with his, knife fingers, or, you know, whatever it is. Maybe I'm confusing him with Edward Scissorhands. But, anyway, these kind of evil characters, this a real life evil character celebrating celebrating his own dark heart and the murdering of unborn children. Now the reason I wanna talk about abortion today, most of you already are very decided on this issue. I'm not trying to persuade you as to what you should or shouldn't believe on that issue. If it's not clear to you already, I'm probably not gonna make much of a dent there. Rather, what I wanna focus on is the ideas that are driving the Republican Party. Again, this is ideas have consequences, and abortion pro life has been a core principle of the Republican party for decades since Roe v Wade, was became law in 1973, and it has remained a core tenant all of these decades, but now now you have a debate over whether or not Whether or not Republicans should ditch abortion as a central tenet. Maybe we just need to get rid of it. Maybe this is an issue we can't win on. And this is because it is argued that it is an issue that is leading to, democrats sweeping, governor seats and, state, representative, chairs, sweeping, congress, this kind of thing. And so you have an individual like Ann Coulter, and I want to be clear that I like Ann Coulter, but she tweeted this. And it's just shocking to me. Pro lifers are going to wipe out the Republican Party. In addition to losing Ohio, Tuesday night, governor Glenn Youngkin lost big in Virginia because of pro life zealots. A 15 week abortion limit would have been fine with Virginia voters, but Republicans couldn't promise to stop there without risking a primary challenge from full band pro lifers. My number one compromised position still stands. Make abortion illegal only for registered Republicans. In all fairness, Ann Coulter, she's not saying that she is, you know, pro abortion. She's she's a pro lifer. What she's arguing is, again, pragmatism. She is saying, yeah, we'll remain we'll we'll remain a pro life party, but let's let's tone it down. Let's let's soften our demands. Let's let's back off of this issue just a little bit and and and not make it central to who we are. The Republican Party of Lincoln's Day The Republican party of Lincoln today was dealing with a very similar issue, and that was slavery. And it was fracturing the Republican party, because there were those who said, look, slavery is the law of the land in, many of the days within the union. We don't wanna fracture our party. We wanna be able to work with Democrats, you know, across the aisle. This this is gonna lead to a a massive fracture in our country. Let's back off of this issue just a little bit. Let's not make they they argued what Ann Coulter is effectively arguing here, but there were those, the abolitionists, who are very staunch and very clear about who they were morally and said, no. Absolutely not. This cannot be allowed to stand. And if it comes to war, then let it come. Whatever comes, let it come because The enslaving of human beings cannot be allowed within this union. Who are we as a nation if we're allowing this kind of stuff? And that I think is where we need to be as people. It's where we need to be as conservatives whether you're Republican or not, but it is where we need to be as individuals. It's where we certainly where you need to be if you are a Christian. We're not pragmatic in our moral our moral outlook. We're very clear about who we are. And by the way, moral Certainty gives other people confidence. It does. It carries the day, and we're allowing We're allowing the cultural left, not just Democrats in this country, but the cultural left globally to act like they have the moral high ground on issues ranging from depopulation to immigration, to homosexuality, the alphabet mafia agenda, you name it. They're acting like they have the moral high ground. They are the very definition of evil, The very definition of evil, and we need to recapture the spirit, The moral certainty and fortitude of a party that in 18/60 said, no. No. We're not going to remain buddies with people who are of this view. We are not we if it fractures the party, it fractures the party. If it fractures the country, it fractures the country. Let what come come because we're going to stand on this issue. Listen. The Republican party is already hunted on on, economic conservatism. They've all, long ago, have given up on that issue. So I'm just not really clear on what would be left. We've given up on on the alphabet mafia agenda on I mean, there's would be nothing left of conservatism. So we need to be very clear about who we are as a people. Everyone's gonna encounter pain in their life. Questions Deal with the degree of one's pain and the source of one's pain and how we deal with our pain. In this course, I'm speaking very personally about my own pain and some of the lessons that I've learned in coping with pain, how we minister to people with pain. And what kind of perspective are we to have on the big questions that surround pain in human suffering. Why would you take a course like this? Well, presumably, if you haven't suffered In your own life, you will encounter people who do, and undoubtedly, some of them are people who are very near and dear to you. I think it'd be very helpful for you to take a course like this in order to understand what they're experiencing in the way but you minister to people in those kinds of circumstances. So I'd love for you to take this course of mine, and I wanna Tell you this, that when you subscribe to tome, you get access not just to my course, but to more than a 100 other courses that are dealing with very practical issues and assisting you in living and in flourishing. So where can you get this course? Well, you can't get it at Amazon, you can't get it at Apple, you can't get it at Netflix. You can only get it at Thome. So I want you to go to tomeapp.com/pain to learn more about my course. Let's get back to the podcast. Now what happened in Ohio? Well, this is what happened in Ohio. Speaker 3: Abortion is Health care. And abortion access is the law Of the land in Ohio. Speaker 0: This is just a little side note, and there will be some people who think I'm being mean when I say this, but I actually think It's noteworthy from the point of view of who's driving this. Have you noticed that many of the people who are drive not all of them, but many of the people who are pushing the feminist agenda, the radical feminist agenda, the LGBTQ alphabet mafia agenda, abortion, that they're often fat and unattractive. It's startling to me how frequently that's the case. People who you're thinking I mean, What is this likelihood she's going to get pregnant? Some of you are gonna say, Larry, that's so mean. That's so cruel to say something like that. I'm not trying to be mean. I'm not trying to be cruel. Rather, I'm making a sociological observation here that frequently these are individuals in my view. This is a theory. I haven't Haven't done a great big study on this, but in my experience, which is considerable at dealing with these kinds of individuals that they are often people who hate attractive, happy women who are happy as mothers. They're happy as wives. They're happy as women. They're just comfortable as being women. And people People who are like that are often hated by those individuals who for one reason or another feel disenfranchised. They feel like they can't be a part of that crowd, so they're gonna go in the absolute other direction, in order to be you know, Gilbert Hyatt wrote a brilliant little book years ago. He was a Columbia classicist in which he was talking about the, The interesting pattern that we see in monarchies of great kings being followed by mediocre kings, and then a great king and a mediocre king and a great king and a mediocre king. It is theory, which is interesting, is that frequently sons Feeling they could not measure up to the greatness of their fathers decided that they would go on the other direction and become characters instead. They would become They would become the villain. They would become the outlaw, instead of trying to, to live up to something they felt like they couldn't live up to and where they felt they were always in the shadow. They were always going to be, you know, second fiddle to the image of their fathers. So they became something completely different. I think that same kind of phenomenon is at work here in a lot of these kinds of women who hate Pretty women, they hate happy women. They hate mothers. They hate wives. And do you know who happy wives. And do you know who they hate most of all? Children. Children. And that comes out in this. Here you have this woman, she's celebrating this like this a great moral victory. It isn't a great moral victory. And Ann Coulter is saying, hey, let's just punt. Let's just punt on this issue and give Them what they want. No. No. Let's don't give them what they want. Let's expose them for who they are. These are individuals who are talking about killing babies. They're the abortion clinic doctor. Do we wanna give grounds to people like that? That's Joseph Mengele right there in that video. And I think this is extremely important to point this out. Abortion, even for the likes of an Ann Coulter, has become we've become so desensitized to abortion that we forget what it really is. We don't speak of it in in terms of a holocaust, but that's what it is. We don't speak of it in the in terms of murder, but that's what it is. We don't speak of it in terms of slaughter of innocence, but that's what it is. If this were 1933 Germany and we had a political party that was running, would we say, Let's just kinda punt on anti semitism. Let's let's just let's just not make that part of our platform. Let's Let's let the Nazis, the fascists have what they want in regards to that. The killing of Jews. I mean, come on. It's Just really not that big a deal. And by the way, Anne Coulter is pro life. I don't I'm not just trying to trash her here, but I am saying that that kind of opinion is dangerous because what's left? What are we saying when we're done with it? What What is our party actually about? What kind of moral standards do are we actually left with if we take the position that Anne Coulter is advocating here? But we're not pro life anymore. I mean, aren't we just basically Democrats after that? Isn't that what we're left with? I loved what the Babylon Bee tweeted. Just brilliant. Babies alive because of Dobbs ruling. Apologize the Supreme Court ruling that that knocked down, after decades, Roe v Wade. Babies alive because of Dobbs' ruling apologize to Republicans for making it hard to win elections. That's great. Should these should these children apologize? Should we regret that these children are now alive instead of dead? No. We have to have standards. Now some of you are saying, but, Larry, we have to we have to be realistic. We have to We have to win. We have to be what's the idea? What's the word? What's the term? Pragmatic. Well, I agree that the Republican strategy is awful. I do agree with that. It looks it looks something like this. I I decided to to try to illustrate the problem here. And so I I went and found a Band Aid, in the medicine cabinet in my house, and I went out and I found unfortunately, I have a crack in my driveway, And I took this picture. This this is a perfect image of the Republican strategy, and that's because The Republican party is increasingly fractured. It is fractured and loosely held together. And, the 2 groups, the 2 main groups are on the one end, evangelicals and social conservatives on the one side. And on the other side, we have rhinos. We have Mitch McConnell's. We have individual we have Nikki Haley's. We have, Mitt Romneys. We have individuals who are basically Democrats, but fiscal conservatives. That's what they are. They don't really care about these kinds of issues. They're Ukraine doesn't get them too upset. They're not terribly upset about what's happening, in Israel with Hamas. They're individuals for whom government has been a vehicle of self aggrandizement and self enrichment. That's what government has been for them. They they they don't have the, you know, the classic, you know, American view of government that one is a citizen who serves on behalf of the people for a time and then returns home, you know, to the farm, to the homestead. That's not their view. That's not what government is. It's something for their own self aggrandizement, self enrichment, and self empowerment, and protecting their own fiefdoms. And thus, I agree that the Republican strategy on abortion is deeply flawed in part because we are a fractured party, but also because I think the strategy is just wrong. In so far, let me rephrase that. It isn't wrong in a moral sense from on on the pro life side of the party. It is rather that it is not especially effective insofar as I think that rather than, you know, abandoning abortion, I think we need to go all in on abortion, but we Have to get our messaging right. We need to expose who these people are. We need to show these kinds of videos, this this abortion clinic doctor. We need to show who these people really are. If we really think that we can't win on an issue that is so Egregiously, murderous, immoral, evil that we can't win the American population over on an issue like that. Who are we trying to win over? Who What what what kind of people are we trying to appeal to at that point? What are we left with? I mean, we're left with a country of people who are morally void, and I don't believe that's the case in the United States. But I do think that the Democrats have been very active in obfuscating the issue and boring it. You know, some of you will recall, I I I thought this was very interesting when my when my oldest son was at, at Yale Law, he was telling me, you know, dad, we are taught the word he says they would use is to complexify issues. So you take something that's very simple like abortion. I mean, it's murder. I mean, you are ending a life. That's what it is. And he says, we're taught to complexify it, to obfuscate, to blur the lines, to make it very unclear as to what it is. Now I wanna be I wanna be very clear on this point. My son is a a very strong, evangelical Christian, a bible believing Christian. So he does not buy into to that view at all, but rather he was learning what their strategy was. He was putting arrows into his own quiver to fire back at them as we hoped, of course, that he would, but he's saying the strategy is to blur everything, to Complexify it so that you don't really feel that you are competent to adjudicate the issue. You need an expert to come in and say, when does life begin? Gosh. I don't know. Oh, this is health care. Did you hear the woman say that? Abortion is health care. They have discovered that is a winning term for them. It's lying. It's 100% lying, but they have learned that that phrase is gaining ground for them. In the same way that in the nineties, the, a homosexual agenda discovered that if they could pass off gay marriage as a civil right. If they could attach their sorted movement to, that of Martin Luther King Junior that the American people would look the other way because the last thing they wanted to be was against civil rights. They wanna be against civil rights. So they decided what we need to do is to bring the homosexual agenda in under the cloak of civil rights. Well, that's what's happening with abortion. Abortion, it's murder. That's what it is. It's murder. But If we can cloak it as health care, what American wants to be seen as being against health care? Or if we can hide it, cloak it under, right to privacy, If we can cloak it as personal choice, if we can cloak it as a woman's right to her own body, Americans Don't wanna be against those things. And, of course, you're not against any of those things when you're opposed to abortion, unless, Again, your morality is nothing more than sentimentality. It's Christian ish. It's not rooted in eternal principles. It's not rooted in truth. It's It's not rooted really in anything beyond your own feelings, which are unreliable. If you make major decisions in your life, an interesting study was done. This is maybe about 25 years ago of Cambridge Cambridge, some of the the intellectual elites on this planet. Cambridge University students discovered that roughly a half of half of them Made major life choices based on vague inner promptings. Another term for that is their own feelings. What you feel on an issue, and your feelings can be manipulated. You know this if you watch, you know, a skillfully told story that can make you sympathetic with murder. It can make you sympathetic with adultery. It can make you sympathetic with, heinous crimes because A good storyteller knows how to manipulate your emotions and make you endorse things that are in fact evil. And that's why it's extremely important that your feelings, are not your guide, rather that you're guided by principle. And again, I I I said this in a in a Twitter thread on great movies that people could watch. One of them is called judgment at Nuremberg. Watch that film. It's about 3 hours, you know, so you have to settle aside a little bit of time. It's a an all star cast, Fencer Tracy, Maximilian Schell, even a young William Shatner appears in that. Judy Garland, Marlene Dietrich, Richard Widmark, numerous others, and the film is about the Nuremberg trials. It's about the Nuremberg trials and the brilliant defense attorney for the Nazis who complexifies the issues all the way through. He complexifies the issues brilliantly in his defense of the Nazis so that the judges themselves would be left kinda going, well, you know, I guess we understand why you killed 8,000,000 people. We understand why you burned their bodies and did grotesque experiments and sterilized people. We understand And while you loaded them all up onto train cars and sent them on one way trips to Mauthausen, Auschwitz, Dachau, Middleball, Dora, Sachsenhaus, and Ravensbruck, Buchenwald. We understand. It's a complex issue. It's hard to adjudicate on this. And I love the words of Spencer Tracy at the very end, which hit like a hammer. And I don't think this is a spoiler, but he basically says what happened here was evil, and nothing on God's green earth can ever make it right. Ladies and gentlemen, abortion is evil. Nothing on God's green earth can ever make it right. No level of clever argument should ever ever distract you from that truth. Grooming children is evil. Sexualizing children is evil. Marxism is evil. The LGBTQ alphabet mafia agenda is evil. Don't be distracted from those things. Don't buy into this idea that we need to punt on this. Rather, what we need to do is be more clear in articulating why we believe it's evil, why we believe it's wrong, and what the alternatives to this or I think the American people will respond to that. Did you know that abortion clinics remained open during the pandemic? They remained open. You couldn't go to your job. You couldn't go get groceries. You couldn't go and see Your relatives in a hospital. My wife who Was for many years a labor and deliver delivery nurse told terrible stories of, I mean, to me just awful. A woman is giving birth, but the father is not allowed to see his wife or to see the child. They're kept in complete I complete isolation by strangers for weeks without seeing their own child. Those are critical weeks. That's a critical time. Can't go see your, your grandparents in a, assisted living home. Nope. Couldn't do that. But abortion clinics, the killing of kids, those factories, they remained open. I have addressed this issue, many times. 1st well, actually, I'm not sure which which one came first here. I guess The first one was, in Fox News, I published a piece in 2019. Here's why pro abortion supporters are so fierce and bullying. Hence, it's not what you think. The pro abortion crowd, they're haters of God. That's what this is about. That's Romans 1. They're haters of God, and it's why they want to rub it in your face. They want to use your tax dollars to kill children because they know that Christians believe that human life is sacred. These are individuals who want to rub it in your face. Now we all know a little bit about that when it comes to, let's say something like sports. Your team wins and you rub it in the face of your, you know, of your your your buddies. You know, you're a red sox fan and you You beat the Yankees on that rare occasion, and, and you wanna, you know, celebrate that. But doing it on something like this, that's not a moral issue. Yankees, Red Sox, USC, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Michigan, Alabama, Auburn, 4th, and 31. Excuse me. I couldn't resist. Those aren't moral issues. This is a moral issue where somebody's trying to take it and rub it in your face. The abortion doctor comes out and says, yes. I love it. He hates that man who is videoing him. He hates what he represents because he's a hater of God. And he says you're you're killing children. He goes, I love it. I love it. That's demonic. That's why they hate it. Then I published a piece just a couple of weeks later in USA Today, abortion by the way, Neither Fox News nor USA Today would publish either one of these today. Abortion advocates hypocritically insult pro life states for bigotry and ignorance. When you write for publications, you don't get to choose the title of your articles. They They're determined by something called SEO, search engine optimization. I would never have given it a title quite so, awkward as this. But, anyway, it does capture the title of the piece. And, again, I'm saying in both of these articles that what it comes down to is that This is an area that the left has chosen to plant their flag and to die on this hill because They recognize that it is a key component of not only their political opposition, but of their, cultural opposition. They want to destroy the primary tenant of your morality, and that's cultural Marxism. And that's That's because they recognize maybe better than conservatives do that the key tenant of our worldview is A belief in God and belief that man is the object of special creation. He's not a he's not a product of random chance a necessity as the, you know, as evolutionists unbelieve. That is to say atheistic, purely naturalistic, evolutionists would argue that human beings are simply an accident in space and time. They have no purpose, and hence a human life has no more value than any other animal on the face of the earth. It's what's driving the World Economic Forum. The World Economic Forum, as I've said many times on this show and by the way, I will be at the World Economic Forum again, in just a couple of months. I was there earlier this year in Davos, Switzerland. I'll be there again. Listen. Whatever Whatever they're telling you, they're also very good at obfuscation. Whatever they say about the planet, about humanity, about food sources, about all these kinds of things. They say it in soft and gentle tones. It seems as though these are people who are do gooders. They're out looking out for the rest of us. Ladies and gentlemen, the World Economic Forum is a fascist, not Marxist. It is a fascist organization that is about depopulation. Now they they carefully Hide that agenda in a bunch of other stuff. If you go to their website and watch their videos, their their videos are all about in, You know, many of them, most of them are about loads of innocuous things like the celebration of diversity and, oh, here's a video on basket weaving in in the Andes, and here's a video on cultural you know, excuse me, environmental conservation in in the Congo, you know, all these kinds of things. But at the end of the day, they are about they're about depopulation. And in case you've forgotten this, I just want to remind you Speaker 1: of it. Speaker 0: Some of you who might be new, to this program may not be familiar with World Economic Forum agenda contributor and coauthor of limits to growth, a massively influential leftist environmentalist handbook, doctor Dennis Meadows. And listen to what doctor Dennis Meadows says. Speaker 4: So far, globally, you are so far above the population and Consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another, it's gonna come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. I, I and I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, That we can I mean, the planet can support Something like a 1000000000 people? Speaker 0: This is key. Speaker 4: Maybe 2,000,000,000 depending On how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably If we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart, that's unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship And the low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're gonna have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, So we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share, the experience and they don't have a few rich, you know, trying to Force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know, but, that's That's what lies ahead. Speaker 0: So abortion in the United States and Coulter and many others, within the Republican party, which say we need to punt on that issue. Ladies and gentlemen, it is a global issue. It is not just an American issue, which is why I want to, wanted to show you once again. And what we'll show him we'll show him in future episodes. I I want people to become very aware of this isn't just a lunatic fringe here. This this isn't, just some guy, you know, who's you know, belongs to some weird commune, you know, living out in the middle of on Montana. This is a world economic forum. His title is agenda contributor, forming the core of their agenda. And as I say, he was coauthor of a book limits to growth, which led to the rise of the creation of the World Economic Forum in the 1st place. This is central to World Economic Forum thinking, and that is also influencing what's going on in the United States. Punt on this issue? No. Absolutely not. This is a hill I will die on, quite willingly die on this issue. I'm trying to think I I mean, I do believe in eternal principles, and I do believe that someday I have to give an answer to God. And I I don't believe that my God has called me to victory per se. He's called me to obedience. And again, there's a difference there. He's called me to adhere to, to principles. And guys like this, So I hope it can be done peacefully. I hope it can be done in a fair way that Everyone this this is the language that cracks me up cynically that everyone could participate in the experience. What is the experience? The annihilation of the world population, reducing it by a minimum of 6 Billion people according to doctor Dennis Meadows. And he really thinks it should be reduced by 7,000,000,000. We have roughly 8,000,000,000 people in the world. He thinks there should only be a 1000000000. But, hey, we can all experience a share in the experience as we reduce the global population. These are the people who are driving policy in the United States. And if we don't stand against them, what do we stand for? Did beat Dietrich Bonhoeffer say, you know, I think anti Semitism is perhaps an issue that we should punt on. You know, maybe we just don't make that big of a deal out of it. Then what's left? Then, you know, what what are you opposing Hitler for? Aggressive warfare? Well, that's what's that's what's driving a big part of his policy is to not just kill the Jews in Germany, but kill them throughout Europe. So you're not gonna impose him on that either. And, I mean, he is making the trains run on time, and he's building beautiful Ottomans. So, I mean, you know, maybe we should just all be fascist. Maybe we should all just be saying Sieg Heil, Sieg Heil, and stand there with with the what are we left with If this is if we punt on an issue like this. And ladies and gentlemen, I also want you to be aware of the fact. I come back to something I said when we're Watching that abortion doctor, this is satanic ritual. This is satanic ritual. This is I'm not sure that that guy and I do believe in demon possession. I'm reminded of what James 2/19 says. You know? You say you believe. Well, the demons believe and shutter. There's a great line in a, I never saw the film. It was with Keanu Reeves called Constantine. And someone says in the commercial, I don't believe in Satan. And the reply is, it's quite chilling. Well, he believes in you. Ladies and gentlemen, you may say you don't believe in Satan. You don't believe in demons. Well, they believe in you. And if you say I do believe there is a God, but you haven't really rooted your life in him, Well, as James 2/19 says, well, the demons believe in him and they shutter and they shutter for they know what their end actually is. And until such time, their ritual is the destruction of human life. It is the perversion. Satan isn't creative. All he can do is to pervert the things of god. He can pervert love. He can pervert beauty. He can pervert marriage. He can pervert human life. As 1 biblical commentator put it on Romans chapter 1, once you suppress the truth, You will soon, pervert the truth, and eventually, you will pervert life itself, and that's where we are is the perversion of every aspect of human life. There are haters of God, And hence, these are the kinds of individuals who celebrate the destruction of human life. We must never Give up on this issue. What we must do is be clear what we are for. We must purge, our churches, our party of individuals who are not on board with the core agenda, with who we are. We must have a mission statement, and then we must be prepared to articulate it with clarity and to fight for it in the public arena, educating the American people on this issue and everything else. We are allowing the cultural left to define, to redefine terms, to redefine the use of language, to redefine the issues as though they themselves occupied by default the Burrell high ground, which they most certainly do not, but they've been very effective with the steady drip of aligned media of intimidating, Americans, intimidating conservatives from really adhering to their principles and to fighting on these issues. And so we must expose it. We must expose the truth for what it is. We must be a people who stand for something. And I end with this, a nation That destroys its children, that makes war on its children as we certainly are, has no regard for its future. But I'll go further than that. A nation that does such things invites the wrath of Speaker 2: God.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Breaking News: The #NewZealand government are desperate to stop this information getting out. They have failed. Massive numbers dying in New Zealand as a result of the mandated vaccinations that were forced on the people by World Economic Forum Cultist #JacindaArdern when she…

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the mortality rates of vaccinated individuals. They analyze the data and find that one batch of Pfizer vaccines had a 21% death rate. They also identify the top 10 vaccinators with the highest mortality ratios. One vaccinator had a 25% death rate, while another had a 17% death rate. The speakers express concern over these numbers and question what could be causing such high mortality rates. They emphasize that this should never happen and suggest that the vaccines may be the cause. The video concludes with a mention of the importance of protecting vulnerable individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So people can find that? Yep. Find my badge? Speaker 1: Yes. They should be able to. Yes. Hello? So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 0: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 1: And so we then look at the percentage ratio. Speaker 0: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 1: Yes, they are. Speaker 0: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% death mortality Speaker 1: rate Speaker 0: from that batch. They are high. Now Speaker 1: There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was other vaccinators themselves. What are they doing? Are we looking at some who have got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators you have the highest ratios of mortality. Speaker 0: For privacy reasons, we have redacted The names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. We have to. We have. Speaker 1: Yeah. So Speaker 0: we've just called it vaccinator 1. Speaker 1: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one has vaccinated 246 people, and 60 of them are now no longer with us. Speaker 0: That is nearly 25%. Speaker 1: 1 in 4. Nearly 1 in 4 That that person vaccinated is right there. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, but this this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, will be 0.75. Speaker 0: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. So it looks then we start to say what is it they were putting into people's bodies Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 By vaccinated, the 3rd highest vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 1: Yeah. And unless they they go around terminally ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, then there is no other explanation for this death. And why would they be doing that anyway? You know, it doesn't make any sense. The box here is meant to protect those people.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Barry Young: The Whistle-blower Who Stood Up for Transparency and Public Health Barry Young, a former employee of Te Whatu Ora, took a courageous stand. Disheartened by what he perceives as critical flaws in the national vaccination program, Young decided to act. He accessed…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

#JacindaArdern former Prime Minister of #NewZealand pushed the vax like a cheap city block drug pusher while telling everyone that the Government was the only true source of information. However evidence has emerged that she and her Government decided they were exempt from…

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Is the World Economic Forum a Cult. The command and control of members of the World Economic Forum by sole Chairman #Klaus Schwab is increasingly being likened to that of a #Cult leader. Unelected Schwab has groomed young people and assisted by other powerful fellow cult…

wideawake_media
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 1:55 PM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 5:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, suggests a significant reduction in the global population to ensure sustainability. He believes the planet can support around one to two billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. Meadows implies that fewer people are necessary for greater freedom and consumption, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate a larger population.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Key Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that the global population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. They mention that a strong dictatorship could potentially support 8 to 9 billion people, but it is not desirable due to the lack of freedom and low standard of living. The speaker hopes for a slow and equal decline in population, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. They admit that these hopes may be pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a, a civil way. And I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. Conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So, But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience, and then you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Inversionism
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 2:12 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 5:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ted Turner, in an interview 15 years ago, suggested that a population decline of 95% to 250-300 million people would be ideal to address overpopulation and climate change. However, the author questions the motives behind such proposals and criticizes the ideas put forth by Turner and others, suggesting an anti-human agenda.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal." - Ted Turner This interview with Charlie Rose was from 15 years ago, and he said that the changes needed to be made to save humanity from impending collapse from overpopulation and climate change would need to come in the next 15-20 years and require global cooperation from every country. Well it's 15 years later and we're still here, listening to the same criminal eugenicists like Ted argue for reduced consumption of meat, more abortions, geoengineering and solar radiation management programs to block the sun, worsening fertility, and all the other anti-human agenda goals iterated by the WEF and their degenerate colleagues. The one question that always lingers in my mind is whether or not these people actually believe the words coming out of their mouth and that overpopulation is the problem, or if there is another subversive evil motivation behind the push beyond just saving the earth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the credit crisis and believes it is a mess because people borrowed too much money on their houses. They emphasize the importance of having equity in one's home and saving money. They also talk about the need to mobilize and change the energy system to combat global warming. They mention the potential benefits of this change, such as job creation and clean air. The speaker warns that not taking action will lead to catastrophic consequences like extreme heat, crop failure, and societal breakdown. They compare not addressing these issues to committing suicide. The speaker expresses optimism that the world can come to its senses and make the necessary changes for the sake of future generations. They use a baseball analogy to illustrate the need to hold the opposition and score runs to win the game. They call for smart political leaders and criticize ineffective leadership.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you think of the credit crisis we're in now? Speaker 1: You know, I think it's a mess. Speaker 0: And why is it a mess? Speaker 1: Well, I because I think what happened is people were borrowing too much money on their houses. I I you know? Doing that. I don't my house is paid for. I mean, it has been. I mean, I I I don't believe you know, I think having equity in your home is a good thing. I I don't believe in spending every penny. Yeah. When I was making $80 a week after taxes were taken out of 20 when I was 21. I saved $10 a week and lived on $70. I mean, I've I've always saved. I I believe that was the thing. That was one of my father taught me that too. Speaker 0: What's possible? Tell me what's possible to do that Speaker 1: in 15 or 20 years, we could completely redo it. If we we have to mobilize if this is how important it is and and how how how important that we do it quickly. We have to mobilize the same way we did when we entered World War 2 in 1941. We have to fully mobilize everything we have and put it into changing the energy system over and not just here in the United States but all over the world. It's gonna be the business business biggest business project in the history of the world. Fortunes, 1,000,000,000 of dollars are gonna be made. Hundreds of thousands of people were gonna be employed. We're gonna have clean air. We're gonna have so many benefits from it. It's not gonna cost us anything. Like, once we get going with it, it's not gonna cost us anything. Only the people that don't don't understand it think it's gonna not doing it will be catastrophic. Will have 8 degrees will be 8 degrees hotter in 10 not 10, but in 30 or 40 years. And basically, none of the crops will grow, most of people who have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down. What the few people left will be living in a in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan, and and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad. There'll be no more corn growing. It it will not doing it is suicide. Just like dropping bombs on each other, nuclear weapons is suicide. So we've gotta stop doing the 2 suicidal things, which are hanging on to our nuclear weapons And Speaker 0: global Speaker 1: and and then after that, we've got to we've got to stabilized the population. When I was born, there Speaker 0: was too What's wrong with the population? I mean Speaker 1: With too many people. That's what that's why we have global warming. We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff. But they If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff. If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons tried that we don't have to worry about human rights. Well, all the humans will all be gone. Speaker 0: You know? Okay. Do you think we'll do it? I mean, are you optimistic in the end Speaker 1: I have country Speaker 0: that the world will come to its senses? Speaker 1: Behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we gotta do it, but I have a way of explaining it very simply. I see a human situation I like into a baseball game. It's in the 7th inning, and we're down by 1 run. What so we're backs to are to the Speaker 0: wall. Right. Speaker 1: What we have to do though in the next 2 innings, the game's not over. It's still winnable. Speaker 0: But what we've got Speaker 1: to do is hold them right where they are with our best pitcher. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And we've got to get a couple runs on the base. Speaker 0: Get a man on the base. Speaker 1: And then get them in. Get them in. And that ties it, and then another run to go ahead, and we win. That's where we are. We're we're in a tough situation, but we can play our way out of it if we do the right things. It's time for smart political leaders. No more dummies. We can't afford dumb Speaker 0: leadership.
wideawake_media
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 11:28 AM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jane Goodall, speaking at the WEF, suggests reducing the global population to 450 million, emphasizing that overpopulation is the root cause of many problems. She believes that the world would be better off with a population size similar to 500 years ago.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Speaking at the WEF, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9XKm0MUIJQs Follow our backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must reduce meat consumption and halt the use of land for cattle farming and growing feed for billions of animals in intensive farms. Additionally, we cannot ignore the issue of human population growth, as it is at the root of many other problems. If the population size resembled that of 500 years ago, the challenges we discuss would not be as significant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to eat less meat. We need to to stop land being used for cattle and growing grain for the billions of animals that we keep in our intensive farms. And then finally, we cannot we cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
wideawake_media
Posted - December 24, 2023 at 10:40 AM
Saved - December 24, 2023 at 8:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Key Club of Rome, believes that the planet can only sustain a population of one to two billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. He suggests that reducing the population is necessary for more liberty and consumption, but emphasizes the importance of achieving this in a civil manner.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Key Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Globally, our population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. I anticipate a decline, but I hope it happens peacefully. Peace doesn't mean everyone will be happy, but conflicts should be resolved without violence. The planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. If we want more freedom and consumption, we need fewer people. Ideally, we should aim for a slow and equal decline to around 1 billion people. This way, everyone shares the experience and avoids a few wealthy individuals imposing their will on others. These hopes may seem pessimistic, but that's what lies ahead.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way. And I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, The planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships, they're always stupid. So, but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a, but But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share, the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, I mean, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
sophiadahl1
Posted - January 1, 2024 at 9:55 AM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 10:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jane Goodall recently suggested that reducing the global population by 90% could help address climate change and meet the World Economic Forum's "Net Zero" targets. She believes that fewer humans would solve many of the organization's issues. However, this idea raises concerns, as it contradicts the fundamental role of carbon, essential for life on Earth. Goodall's comments have sparked debate, especially considering that only 3% of carbon dioxide emissions are from human activity, and alternatives like reforestation are overlooked.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

🧵 1/ WEFSpeaker Jane Goodall Advocates Reduction of Global Population By 90%‼️ WEF member has touted a shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization’s“Net Zero”targets‼️ English primatologist/ anthropologist Jane Goodall, who WEF lists as one of its“agenda-🙏👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago. We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago. We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

2/ -contributors" told her fellow globalists that they could“save the planet”from “global warming”if the Earth’s population was 90 percent smaller than it is today‼️ Goodall argues that all of the WEF’s“problems”would be solved if fewer humans were walking the Earth‼️🙏👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: 'If I just have this magic power, I would like to, without causing any pain or suffering, reduce the number of people on *****.' The speaker articulates a hypothetical wish to use magical power to decrease the population while ensuring no pain or suffering is caused. The statement centers on applying a supernatural ability to lower the number of people, constrained by a stipulation against harm. The remark conveys an intent to achieve population reduction through magical means, with the qualifier about avoiding pain or suffering highlighting the proposed method's ethical framing. The transcript records a single, explicit expression from Speaker 0 regarding using imagined power to affect the number of people on the censored placeholder '*****'.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I just have this magic power, I would like to, without causing any pain or suffering, reduce the number of people on

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

3/ If reducing population at all was not a big enough assault on our common sense,doing it that we may completely eradicate most important element essential for life on earth should give everyone pause‼️ An online CSU Biology textbook outlines the significance of Carbon🙏👇

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

4/ "Carbon is the most important element to life. Without this element, life as we know it would not http://exist.As you will see, carbon is the central element in compounds necessary for life."‼️🙏👇 Link 🔗👇 ck12.org/chemistry/Comp…

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

5/ Since carbon is the main element in cells,structures of organisms that carry out life processes in living things,it is essential to life on earth. "All these things we talk about wouldn't-🙏👇

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

6/ -be a problem if there was the size of population there was 500 years ago."There were only 500 million people 500 years ago instead of 7.5 billion.Remember God says to fill the earth and subdue it and almost any plane trip shows that there is so much land that is available🙏👇

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

7/ With only 3% of carbon dioxide being produced by man and the ignored solution of reforestation,if they really believe in a threat due to climate change,it is preposterous to suggest such an evil wish in the name of compassion‼️🙏👇 CSU Biology🔗👇 ck12.org/book/CK-12-Bio…

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

8/ Link 🔗‼️🙏👇 Slay News🔗👇 https://slaynews.com/news/wef-member-reducing-human-population-90-percent-achieve-net-zero/

WEF Member: Reducing Human Population by 90% Would Help Achieve 'Net Zero' - Slay News A World Economic Forum (WEF) member has touted a shocking suggestion for meeting the globalist organization's "Net Zero" targets. slaynews.com

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

Credit 👉 CovidVaccineAdverseReactions💥🙏💫

wideawake_media
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 2:40 PM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 9:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a member of the Club of Rome, suggests that the planet can sustain a population of one to two billion people, depending on the desired level of liberty and material consumption. He believes that achieving this reduction can be done peacefully. Meadows also mentions that a stronger dictatorship could potentially accommodate a larger population.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Club of Rome member, Dennis Meadows, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to one billion—an 87.5% reduction from today’s population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have." "If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://wide-awake-media.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Globally, we are consuming more than the planet can sustain, and it will eventually come crashing down. The speaker hopes for a peaceful decline in population and consumption, where conflicts are resolved without violence. They believe the planet can support around 1-2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption. However, having a smart dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate even more people. Ideally, the decline should be slow and equal, ensuring that everyone shares the experience rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing their will. These hopes may seem pessimistic, but that's what the future holds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet, that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a in a special way. Peaceful. Peace doesn't mean, that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so, that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people? Maybe 2,000,000,000 depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So, But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have a but but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1,000,000,000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, so that people share the experience, and then you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
Video Not Available youtube.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
RealAlexJones
Posted - April 4, 2024 at 2:11 AM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 12:36 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Club Of Rome Unveils Plan To Cull Billions From The World Population This globalist cult wants every last human dead to reduce that pesky CO2 so they can have the planet all to themselves. https://t.co/DS9li8tn0P

Video Transcript AI Summary
Companies and governments need to prioritize long-term sustainability peacefully. Agriculture must play a key role in achieving net zero emissions by 2050. Transitioning to a low-energy lifestyle is crucial for a sustainable future. TerraPower is developing a nuclear power plant to combat climate change. The push for net zero faces challenges from coal use in China and India. Iodine deficiency is a major global issue addressed by X3 iodine supplement. Visit infowarsstore.com for discounted products supporting the broadcast.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It will be a big revolution to bring companies and governments to really give importance to the long term. That would be a revolution. I hope that it can occur in a a a civil way. I I and I mean civil in a peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through to force. Speaker 1: We can't get to net zero. We don't get this job done unless agriculture is front and center as part of the solution. I Speaker 0: mean, we could even have 8 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship and a low standard of living. You can have a buddy. But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sense, so we're gonna have a 1,000,000,000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. So a key issue here is the speed of the decline. We hope for a slow decline because that gives you time to adjust. So a a key question is what is the force that we're trying to adjust to? And if we know the speed, then that tells us something about kind of revolution we need. So we need personal revolutions. We need people to reimagine a lifestyle which, requires much less energy and material. A minister of, let's say, agriculture would do something which actually makes the farming situation seem worse in the That would be a a hard revolution. We we need all of those, kinds of things. Speaker 2: The British government with their top universities and government institutions has put out a report called absolute zero where they don't wanna just have net zero increase in carbon or lower it to a previous state. They wanna get rid of all carbon, which humans are. Speaker 3: But because we need to get to 0 emissions by 2050, we have to come Speaker 1: up with an alternate way, which isn't too much more expensive Speaker 4: to perform those same activities without emitting any greenhouse gases. People began to talk about a world in which greenhouse gas emissions and greenhouse gas removals balanced each other out so that the overall effect was net 0. Speaker 5: We'll need to go from a world economy that pumps out on the order of 40,000,000,000 tons of c o two a year to one that sucks down, that is removes billions of tons per year in the future to get to that net zero future. Speaker 2: Bill Gates and his 17 year old energy company, TerraPower, are planning their first cutting edge nuclear power plant. Speaker 3: So this company TerraPower that, I'm I'm very involved in, it is talking with Chinese partners. It's signed, some, agreements where the pilot plant, there's a good chance it will be built first in China, but then it will be for global usage. I don't use some of the, less proven, approaches. Such as? I don't plant trees. Speaker 4: Some people would even say Speaker 6: that if you just planted enough trees, it could take care of the climate issue altogether. And that's complete nonsense. Okay. Speaker 3: I mean, are we the science people or are we the idiots? Like, which one do we wanna be? Speaker 7: 50 years ago, nearly everybody considered unlimited growth as the only pathway to greater prosperity for all. And then there came a group of young scientists and showed that there are indeed limits to growth. That truly was a revolution. Speaker 0: If we begin making really drastic changes, we can reverse, the growth pressures and try to bring the system back down under the capacity, which can be supported, by the planet. Speaker 8: But we don't burn coal anymore because we didn't just close down our coal fired power stations. We blew them up. At the same time, China is, even as we speak, building the equivalent of 2 new coal fired power stations a week. India has a vast expansion program of coal fired power stations. Everything that we do is completely blotted out by what other much larger countries are doing to maintain their own power. Now if you want to live in a country with net zero, if you want to live in a country where nobody can afford to heat their house, where people have incredibly expensive and largely non functioning heat pumps inflicted on them, if you want lots of people to lose their jobs because there's no energy, if you wanna be cold all the time, if you want the computers which make life possible, in fact, every form of life, to shut down every so often, then carry on believing that the the the the demand to to to go for net zero, to keep it in the ground is intelligent and thoughtful. Speaker 2: It it's it's so nightmarish that it it's it's just hard to describe, what they're doing other than total futilism, the end of civilization. Speaker 3: Can you explain a little bit about how this, technology works? Okay. Basically And then you're just among friends here. Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 2: You shouldn't purchase the products at infowarsstore.com just because it keeps us on the air. You should get these products because they are game changing. Everybody knows our information. It's some of the most hardcore accurate intel on the planet. Well, our products are absolutely no different. They are amazing. They are the missing links people need. And of all the deficiencies that are out there, one of the biggest problems on the planet is iodine deficiency. Just look up iodine deficiency on Wikipedia. More than 2,000,000,000 people that UN estimates have major cognitive disabilities because they haven't had iodine. It is essential in all electrochemical activity in the body, but most iodine in plants or in meat is bound to other compounds or other elements. So you don't get the full absorption. Not with x 3. It has all 3 of the healthy types of iodine in it. The good halogens, the deep earth crystal, pure nascent iodine, and then 2 other types the scientists tell us help with absorption. X3 has been sold out for 6 months. It's now back in stock for 40% off at infowarsstore.com and it funds the broadcast and everything else we do. So I wanna encourage you all to get your X3 for 40% off now at infowarsstore.com. Takes about 2 weeks to kick in, but almost everybody has incredible results. Separately, we have another great product, 10 hour clean energy, turbo force available discounted at infowarsstore.com as well. It's discounted as well despite the fact we're about to sell out. So whether it's X3 Next Level Iodine or whether it's TurboForce 10 hours of energy, they're both available discounted right now atimpolewarstore.com. It funds the broadcast, and it's game changing. Take action now.
toobaffled
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 6:52 AM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

In 1991, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) published a controversial text calling for extreme global depopulation, calling for the elimination of 350,000 people each day, or 100 million people per year. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/33-years-ago-the-un-called-for-global-depopulation-of-100-million-people-annually/

33 Years Ago, the UN Called for Global Depopulation of 100 Million People Annually In 1991, UNESCO published a piece calling for hundreds of millions of people to be eliminated every year to fight climate change. thepeoplesvoice.tv
iluminatibot
Posted - January 25, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Saved - January 26, 2025 at 4:22 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"I would like to reduce the number of people on the planet" ~ Jane Goodall - WEF Advisor https://t.co/BU69ncgaYZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jane Goodall expressed a desire to reduce the global population, citing concerns over overpopulation. Bill Gates, associated with the World Economic Forum, suggested that improved healthcare and vaccines could potentially lower the population by 10 to 15%. There are implications that these influential figures aim to control or eliminate those they deem unnecessary. The argument is made that if they believe in the need for depopulation, they should demonstrate their commitment by starting with themselves.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen to this. I would like to reduce the number of people on the planet because there's too many of us. That was Jane Goodall. She works with the World Economic Forum. She got a knighthood and all sorts of awards for her humanitarian work. Do you know who else received the knighthood? Jimmy Savile. Let's keep going. The world today has 6,800,000,000 people. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. That was Bill Gates, also a regular of the World Economic Forum. They gave him the middle of freedom and he's also our doctor now and he wants to inoculate the entire planet. Let's just be honest with each other. These people wanna get rid of us, enslave the strong ones and remove the useless eaters. And if they believe that humans are so bad and we need to depopulate, how about you show your great leadership skills and start with yourself?
wideawake_media
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 8:32 AM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 9:54 PM

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

The WEF’s Jane Goodall suggests the world would be a much better place if the human population were reduced to the level of 500 years ago—roughly 500 million people, a 93% reduction from today's population. https://t.co/H85h8yNMRM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We cannot hide away from human population growth because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there were if there was the size of population that there was five hundred years ago.
ltgiv
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 11:54 PM

@ltgiv - Louis T. Getterman IV — e/acc

Remember when Jane Goodall spoke at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in January 2020? Remember how she alluded to the same thing that the Georgia Guidestones demand? Good riddance to bad rubbish as one more member of the nihilistic death cult exits the building. https://t.co/G0oHkBgHFW

NWOdeathspiral
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Saved - October 3, 2025 at 12:18 AM

@NWOdeathspiral - AETHERWISE 🇬🇧🇫🇷

Jane Goodall was antihuman. She sat on a WEF stage and quoted the Georgia Guidestones message of depopulation. Jane agreed 8 billion ppl should be culled bc climate change. Jane pushed climate woo at every turn. Jane was a demon. https://t.co/zecrHy68RX

wideawake_media
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 9:59 AM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 12:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dennis Meadows, a Club of Rome member, envisions a civil depopulation of the planet to one billion people, a drastic reduction from today. The Earth can sustain up to two billion individuals, depending on liberty and material consumption. Fewer people allow for more freedom and consumption, while a strong dictatorship could accommodate eight or nine billion. (Source: YouTube) Visit wideawakemedia.com for similar content. ClimateScam, NetZero, DepopulationAgenda.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Dennis Meadows, a prominent member of the Club of Rome, hopes the "necessary" depopulation of the planet, down to just one billion people—an 87.5% reduction from today's population—can "occur in a civil way". "The planet can support something like a billion people, maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have. If you want more liberty, and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have eight or nine billion, probably if we have a very strong dictatorship." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dbo6uvJBtZg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #DepopulationAgenda

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges that our current population and consumption levels are unsustainable for the planet. They express a desire for a peaceful and civil decline in population, where conflicts are resolved without violence. The speaker suggests that the planet can support around 1 to 2 billion people, depending on the level of liberty and material consumption desired. They mention that having more liberty and consumption requires fewer people, while a strong dictatorship with a low standard of living could accommodate a larger population. However, the speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom and a high standard of living, suggesting that we need to reduce our population from the current 7 billion to a more sustainable level. They hope for a slow and equal decline, where everyone shares the experience, rather than a few wealthy individuals imposing solutions on others. The speaker admits that these hopes may be pessimistic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In one way or another, we are so far, Goboy, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels, which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down. So I don't hope to avoid that. I hope that it can occur in a a civil way, and I mean civil in a special way, peaceful. Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy, but it means that conflict isn't solved through violence, through through force, but rather in other ways. And so that's what I hope for, that we can I mean, the planet can support something like a 1000000000 people, maybe 2,000,000,000, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have? If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people. And conversely, you can have more people. I mean, we could even have 8,000,000,000 or 9,000,000,000 probably if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart. Unfortunately, you never have smart dictatorships. They're always stupid. So but if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, you can have it. But we want to have freedom, and we want to have a high sense, so we're going to have a 1000000000 people. And we're now at 7, so we have to get back down. I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow, and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience and you don't have a few rich, you know, trying to force everybody else to to deal with it. So those are my hopes. I mean, these are pretty pessimistic hopes, you know. But, that's that's what lies ahead.
View Full Interactive Feed