reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 9, 2024 at 1:39 AM

@ElijahSchaffer - E

The most important video of 2020 https://t.co/3nMNlxl5Q8

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are calls for uprisings and unrest in the streets due to dissatisfaction with the government. Violent actions and threats towards the President are mentioned, along with references to historical figures like John Wilkes Booth. The idea of violence towards the President is expressed by various speakers, including a state senator. The message is that the opposition will not stop before or after the election, and people should take note of this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings all over the country, and maybe there will be. Speaker 1: People need to start taking to the streets. This is a dictator. Speaker 2: You know, there needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there's unrest Speaker 0: in our lives. Enemies of the state. Speaker 1: Show me where it says that protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful. Speaker 0: Do something about your dad's immigration practices, you. Feckless. Speaker 1: When they go low, we can Speaker 3: How do you resist the temptation to run up and bring her neck? Speaker 1: Biggest terror threat in this country is white men. Most of them radicalized right up to the right. Speaker 3: I thought he should have punched him in the face. They said even if you lost, he insulted your wife. Yes. Speaker 1: He leaned Speaker 3: on the escalator and called Mexicans, rapists emerged. He said, well, what do you think I should have done? So I think you should have punched him in the face and then gotten out of the race. Speaker 1: He would have Speaker 3: been a hero. Speaker 1: I'd like to punch him in the face. I said if we're in high school, I'd take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him. Punch some people in the face. When was the last time an actor assassinated a president? They're still gonna have to go out and put a bullet in Donald Trump, and that's a fact. Speaker 2: Look as his character is stabbed to death. Speaker 0: Where is John Wilkes Booth when you need him? Speaker 2: I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House. Speaker 1: A Missouri state senator is under investigation by the Secret Service after saying she hopes president Trump is assassinated. I will go and take Trump out tonight. And if you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you welcome Speaker 0: And sadly, the domestic enemies to our voting system and our honoring our constitution, are right at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 2: They're not gonna stop before election day in November, and they're not gonna stop after election day. And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels. That this isn't they're not gonna let up and they should not. Speaker 1: If you think we're right, you're not you ain't seen nothing yet.
Saved - May 19, 2023 at 11:37 PM

@JeanAVallery - Jean Andre Vallery

Listen to this, completely https://t.co/1DmTYROHKy

@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan

“Former IRS agent explains why income tax is voluntary and technically illegal”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a former IRS agent, shares her experience working for the IRS and her realization that the income tax system is fraudulent. She explains how the IRS uses tactics to make people believe they owe more money than they actually do. After leaving the IRS, she researched and discovered evidence that the income tax is not necessary for running the country. She also discusses the Federal Reserve and its non-federal nature, as well as the media's influence in suppressing this information. The speaker encourages people to do their own research and make informed decisions about paying taxes. She emphasizes the importance of understanding the system and taking action to bring the country back on track.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jackson. She is an ex IRS agent, CPA fraud examiner. She was working for the IRS. She was on the fast track to success there. She was doing very well, had received numerous awards for all of the work she did, and she realized that there is no law and that the biggest fraud was the IRS. Speaker 1: I tried to be the best at whatever I did. So when I got to the IRS, I hit the ground running. My 1st year, 1988, I got a fraud award. It's a big Shaped in Georgia award for fraud. But I got numerous awards and my biggest one is from the IRS commissioner himself back in 1995, it was Freddie Goldberg. One of the things that I wanted to chip you off on as far as what the IRS does before I get into the story, They have well, they had. I don't know what they're doing now, but they had what's called the market segment specialization program or MSSP. They would take different market segments, Like ministers. And try to figure out how much money you were under reporting. Let's take beauticians, For example, I'm gonna audit her beauty shop. She owns the shop and she has some people working there. Based on the assumption that the IRS has that People don't report all of their money, but they like to put all their expenses on there. So granted all her expenses are on the tax return and I figure out how many bottles of this and that she bought, I can calculate a dollar figure. So I'll tell Sophia after it's all over and we're buddy buddy, I I just shock her. And I said, well, guess what? It looks like based on my calculations that you really brought in $80,000, but you have 50 on the tax return. So here, you have to owe you owe the IRS back $30,000. What would she do? She would write She would sign off on it. I only had 2 cases in seven and a half years where where somebody actually bumped at me. People are so afraid. The the government and the media have gotten you guys so afraid of the IRS that you don't even buck them. Now mind you, she might have left the money off. Maybe there was several times where she just didn't report the And maybe that's why. Maybe she didn't even had she has no idea how much she'd quote and quote underreported. Maybe that was it. But they always acquiesce. The Gap 1, anybody on a laundromat, they have one that will calculate based on your water bill, how many loads of wash is your laundromat? And the point to all of this is, this is what they do to people and people just acquiesce to it. When I quit the IRS in 1995, And after maybe a year of being Jim Cleaver and realizing that that was just not me, I hung my shingle which Which in accounting terms or business terms is you you start your own business. Now you know that picture of uncle Sam, the one that says uncle Sam wants you? I used that same picture and I and I had it really big and it says, Uncle Sam wants your money. But I'm a former IRS agent. I'm gonna show you how to get it back. You know, the people came running. And then these people start coming to me saying, Speaker 2: I keep hearing that, Speaker 1: we're not supposed to pay tax. I keep hearing that the tax law was a fraud. And like I said, I was raised differently. I never would look at that person and say, you're cuckoo. I wouldn't even think it. It's like, okay. You know, in in this back burner back here, I would think to myself, okay. There's some people out there that actually think that the income tax doesn't apply to us or it's just Fraud orders being a supply. I didn't know anything about it because remember, I'm rolling around with my little businesses and whatnot. So 1 night in, maybe in early June, one of my pastor Client called. It was night. It was about 9 o'clock at night. And she said, you know what? I think it was maybe a Wednesday night. After her Wednesday night service, she said, I've got this per parishioner that just keeps bugging me about this income tax she's talk about that we're not liable for the income tax, and she wants to talk to you. Can I give this lady your telephone number? And I said, okay. So maybe about 10 minutes later, this lady called me. She said, Speaker 2: I have a question Speaker 1: for you. Are we supposed Speaker 2: to pay income tax or not? Speaker 1: And I said, okay. Do you want the cuff answer or do you want the real answer? She said, I want the real answer. I said, well, I really don't know, you know, even though I'm a former IRS agent. I haven't done the research, but I hear that there's a credible body of evidence out there that says that we don't owe income tax. I was okay. I mean, I took the information. I was sitting there listening like, okay. Okay. Okay. And, you know, I said, okay. This lady had a lot of information. I don't know where she got it from. So a few weeks later, she called me again and she Speaker 2: said, miss Jackson, miss Jackson, that information I told you on the phone? It's in the USA Today. Pull it up on the Internet. Speaker 1: Okay. So I got the USA Today. It was July 7, 2000. And it says, dear We The People, most citizens are not required to file an income tax return. The 16th amendment to to the constitution as a fraud. And if you file, you waive your 5th Amendment rights. I said, okay. That's another stuff she was saying. Now this is a lot of reading. But I kept reading because I was very interested, you know, being a CPA and into fraud and all that. I wanna see what was going on. So here in the 3rd column, It says no one has been able to collect the $50,000 reward offered by Bill Conklin to anyone that can identify the section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes a typical worker liable for the worker liable for the income tax. Serious about winning the $50,000. Okay. So I was at my desk. Basically, I just shoved everything off my desk And got the codes out, the regulations out, the tax got I got on the Internet to look at the Cornell University site, all these different things and I started researching. And 2 weeks later, I said to myself, oh my goodness. We have a problem here. It doesn't look like I'm gonna win this money. And I was sitting there at my desk thinking, Speaker 2: this is this thing is a fraud. Speaker 1: To 2 weeks it took me to sit there and and and realize that. I didn't just look at the positive, I looked at the negative, I looked at the IRS site. Speaker 2: All these things are going this thing is a fraud. Speaker 1: Being being a CPA and a former IRS agent, I sat there at the desk, you know, I was by myself, and all these thoughts started going going through my head. The first thought was, Now finally, open up the codes and regulations. Because see at the IRS, they trained us with these little guys. We didn't use the codes and regulations. We would get one of these, and you would have to read it, understand it, and pass this little test. And all these little guys that I got, I read them and I I Speaker 2: made a's on all my tests. Speaker 1: And I thought, and I guess the rest of the agents in training thought that the information that was in here was the same that was in those stick codes and regulations, But it's not necessarily the same. The things that are in these training manuals are not necessarily the same thing as in codes and regulations. I learned that in my studying. In the time that I was doing the research, I also learned about the pocket commission. And I'm gonna let this go around the room, but y'all gotta give it back. This is The outside that I purchased was the pocket commission that I had. And before I left, I had the sense of mind to make a copy. This is a little badge I used to flip out at people and say, give me your books and records. Give me your bank statements. Give me all your credit cards, you know. And, you know, people okay. Here. You know? Even the counties, I go to the county, do it. I go just about anywhere split this little thing out and get whatever I want. You know? There's a lot of power nuts out there doing that, guys. Y'all know it. Half of you already know about it. There's an enforcement pocket commission, and there's a non enforcement pocket commission. And I started looking back at this thing. It has SER, Southeast Region. First of all, I'll read it. It has My picture up here, and it says, Sherry Jackson, whose signature and picture appear above is duly commissioned as internal revenue agent and has authority to perform all duties conferred upon such officers under all laws and regulations administered by the Internal Revenue Service, including the authority to investigate And require and receive information as to all matters relating to such laws and regulations. And it has SER and some other numbers and an a. And based on this Internal Revenue Manual, a means administrative. So I'm an administrative clerk out there on the front lines. And I'm an administrative clerk with a non enforcement pocket commission. Okay. So I'm starting to get angry here. To Starting to think about all the I had to take bribes and get little tape recorders taped to my body and and The little microphones on me and going to take bribes from people. But, you know, thinking about stuff like that, you know, what they kept me out here, and I'm thinking I really have authority. And this is administrative administrative non enforcement pocket commission. That was one of the other things I thought about. And then I thought about it and I found out. This is this is one of the another issue, a levy versus a notice of levy. This is something that I didn't deal with a lot Because I was an agent, and I just assessed the tax. I didn't I wasn't a tax collector. I just assessed it. So this is a notice of levy, and someone said, hey. This is a notice of levy. This is what the banks get or your your job or whatever. They said, look at the back of it. So I'm looking at the back of this notice of levy, and it says, section 6331, levy and distraint. And then it says b and c. And I'm thinking, it starts off with b? What happened to a? So I looked up a, and here's a. And it says, levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, Employer or elected official of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of United States or the District of Columbia by serving in notice of living. I'm thinking, but that's not most people. That's not the person that works at AT and T or BellSouth or Coca Cola. That's not most people. Are people noticing that the a isn't on here? Aren't they aren't they curious about it? Why are they doing this? All this is going through my head during this period of time, then I'm realizing that there's there's a red in the camp. That's what I call it. But this is the the straw that broke the camel's back. The Federal Reserve is not federal. How many of you did not know before today that the Federal Reserve isn't federal? If you didn't don't be shy. If you didn't know before today that the Federal Reserve isn't federal, raise your hand. Most people don't know that. 9 out of 10 people that I asked off the street Don't understand that the Federal Reserve is a non auditable private banking cartel. They are collecting $36,000,000 an hour in interest from the American people. $36,000,000 an hour and interest from the American people. My children, my 2 children, were born $86,000 in debt Based on the national debt. Now why am I gonna take away from those children to give to somebody that is gonna be born in 2030? It's not gonna happen. So that was my decision. It was very easy. You know, you think about stuff like fear. Oh, the IRS is not gonna get you. They're gonna take your stuff. That's not important to me. Stuff's not important to me. My children aren't important to me. I'm one of those mothers that will roll up her sleeves with 1 leg and try to whoop you if you mess with my children. And I think that a lot of mothers are like that. So this is what my decision was, and I went on and started educating people. One of the things that people ask me once I've made this decision and started talking about it, how are we gonna run the country without the income tax? I don't know how much Dan got into it, but the Grace Commission report that Ronald Reagan put out in 1994 84, sorry, says that none of the money collected in income tax goes towards running the country. But the bottom line is it's not going towards running the country. So you patriotic people out there, you've been fooled. Beardsley Rummel, he was Federal Reserve Chairman back in 1946, did a speech for the American Bar Association. The title of his speech was taxes for revenue are obsolete. Within the body of this report, he says that the taxes, to The income taxes for distribution of WIL. What is redistribution of WIL? What is that? That's taking from me that But I've worked hard for it and given it from somebody else to somebody else. Shouldn't I have the right to redistribute my wealth if I want to? Another question that they asked me is, Speaker 2: how come I haven't heard this on TV, Speaker 1: or on Speaker 2: the radio, or on the newspaper? Well, sweetie, The simple answer to that is Speaker 1: the same people who own the television stations and the newspapers and the radio stations are the same people who are involved with the Federal Reserve. And here is a little statement that says that it only requires 5% ownership to significantly influence the media. Rockefeller is one of the original shareholders of the Federal Reserve. As early as 1963, the House Banking subcommittee reported that Rockefeller, through Chase Manhattan Bank, controlled 5.9% of the stock in CBS And the bank, and gained interlocking directorates with ABC. I went all the way through high school, all the way through college, All the way through testing for the CPA and all this IRS training and didn't hear about any of this. You think they want this information out here For you guys to eat up and chew up and find out what's really going on. I don't think so. Now another one. Why why don't we just tell our elected officials about this? And to make a really long story short, the We The People Foundation, the same people that put out this ad, put together a hearing. And these 40 researchers were gonna ask the IRS and the DOJ these questions, and we're gonna have this big meeting in Washington called the Truth in Taxation Hearings. Okay? So we got together with 537 questions. So we sent them the 537 questions so they could research and have the answers, and what did they do? They reneged on coming. They signed off on it, but they reneged on coming. So you all didn't get to hear the truth. We went on and had the hearings anyway, put it on CD, speak. Marched around Washington, giving it to all 535 congressmen and senators. Please look at this information. We got stupid responses back, like, thank you for visiting our offices in Washington. The next time you come from Washington come to Washington, please visit us again. They don't care. Your presidents don't care. Another one that they ask me or they'll say something like, well, this just sounds like it's some kind of conspiracy theory. Y'all hear that a lot? Okay. Well, tell me this. What's the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy? Don't you understand that this is all by design? All this black, white stuff. You're white. I'm black. You know? You're a Democrat. I'm a Republican. You know, y'all heard of divide and conquer before. Right? Why y'all letting us letting them do it to us? While I'm sitting up here Arguing with this man about what his great great great granddaddy did to mine. There's this big old fence closing in around us. And while I'm sitting here wasting time and he's sitting here telling me why he didn't own it, we need to put our heads together and figure out how to get out of the fences these people are building around us. Am I right? Yeah. That's where we gotta be. To Divide and conquer, we can't let that work anymore. It's been working all these years. Then we need to get together and understand. 1st of all, you need to understand what is going on with your money. You work hard. It's like we're on a hamster we're a hamster on a wheel. Speaker 2: This country start it out with taxation without representation. Where are Speaker 1: we now? How why did we get back to where we started? We got lazy and comfortable. Get out of your comfort zone. I never tell people to file a tax return. I never tell them not to file. I never tell people to pay taxes, And I never tell them not to pay. What I tell people is to do your own research, do your due diligence, and decide whether or not you're gonna be a slave or get off the plantation. That's your choice. So in essence, you're wasting time. As long as you continue to feed the monster, the monster's gonna grow. They're gonna always have they're gonna laugh in your face. And any kind of calls that you have, anything that you're trying to do in your life concerning getting things back on track with our country the way it's supposed to be, You're gonna get laughed at because you continue to give them the money to do whatever it is they're doing to us. A lot of people don't care. A lot of people get the money taken out of their checks, and they actually think they're getting, Oh, I get back $3,000 every year. They don't take anything from me. I said, sweetie, look at your w two. They took 14,000. They gave you back 3,000 of your own money. Oh. But the point is, if each of us understands where we are, who we are and tries to do something about it, then we're gonna get somewhere. This is a great country, but it's off track. And who's gonna get it back on track? We are. Thank you.
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 3:44 AM

@LegendreKristy - Kristy Legendre

Here’s the link to the full video for anyone interested!

Saved - November 12, 2023 at 2:24 AM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Download these 8 minutes onto your brain

Video Transcript AI Summary
These individuals, referred to as government cutouts, are not traditional academics but rather work closely with the government. The head of the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) consortium, which includes Stanford University, UW, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, openly admitted that EIP was created to fill the gaps in government capabilities. They were given a $3 million government grant to continue their censorship work for the 2022 midterms and 2024 election. All four entities in the EIP consortium receive funding from the federal government, and there is a revolving door between government and academia, with individuals moving between positions. This close relationship and funding from the government raise questions about their independence and objectivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These are not academics. These are government cutouts. I'm gonna say that again. These are not academics, certainly not in any classical sense that matches any definition that you probably associate with an academic. These are government cut outs. They are self aware that they are government cutouts. The government itself is self aware that the universities are government cutouts. In fact, the head of EIP, the Election Integrity partnership. The head of the 120 person censorship consortium partnered with the Department of Homeland Security even described his university and EIP writ large as a government cutout. Speaker 1: There was a lack of capability around election disinformation. This is not because CISA didn't care about disinformation, but at the time, they lacked, both kind of the funding and the legal authorizations, to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation was operating. So because of the feedback, and the ideas from these, this group, we were able to pull together pretty quickly a project between these 4 different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves. Just, lacked the legal authorizations. So we were able to pull together a project, try to fill the gap Of the things that the government cannot do themselves. Speaker 0: So understand what he just said right there. This is Alex Stamos, the head of Stanford University's censorship lab, the Stanford Air Rhetory. The head of the entire EIP consortium with Stanford, UW, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council saying that CISA, the censorship sub agency within DHS, wanted to do this counter misinformation work, which as you will see is just straight up censorship work, that's it. It's not research, it's mass flagging and programming the algorithms to tune you out of existence. And he is saying, the federal government, CISA, wanting to do this, expressed an interest in doing this, but they knew that it was illegal, they lacked the legal authorizations, and so EIP was set up to fill the gaps of what the government could not do itself. This is what is called a government cutout: When the government wants to do something, but doesn't want to be seen doing it, it launders, or outsources to a non governmental private sector or civil society institution, working closely behind the scenes with the government, so that, technically, even though it's government sourced and government sought, The fingerprints are on an entity at the plausible, deniable level, at a non governmental way. This is stuff the CIA does. When the state department that wants to carry out a deniable operation, doesn't want the US government's fingerprints on something, the CIA will carried out, and it will work through a series of cut out organizations that don't look like they're government. They will work with private firms, and they will work with universities to launder the operation to remove the fingerprints, but here you have the head of EIP giving up the game, saying they only set it up because the government told them they couldn't do it. They were expressly set up as a cutout. The whole premise of using a word like academic is to present the academics as if they are independent, totally independent from the government, removed, making up their own minds, a firewall between them and the government, and yet not only were they partnered, and as we will see, using government funded domestic disinformation switchboards To mass flag your posts, they were a birth child of the federal government. They asked the government for permission to exist. This is page 21 of EIP's 292 page tell all report in which they bragged about everything they did and got rewarded by the Biden administration with a joint $3,000,000 government grant to do more censorship Chip, for the 2022 midterms and the 2024 election. They also sell this, this, censorship structuring instruction manual to other universities. What you see on page 21 here is EIP's operational timeline, their self described operational timeline. You'll see on June 9, 2020, this is 4 months before the election, before election day of the last presidential election. EIP had a meeting with CISA to present EIP concept. So this is EIP, Alex meeting with the government to present to the government their proposed solution for filling the gaps of what the government wanted to censor, but could not do itself. You can't get more government cut out than that. Actually, you can. These are screenshots, citations in the FFO report showing that every single entity in the Election Integrity Partnership, all 4 of them, Stanford, UW, Graphica and the Atlantic Council all are funded by the federal government. Graphica gets got about $7,000,000 in Pentagon grants, the Atlantic Council gets funds from the Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, the National Endowment For Democracy, USAID, And Stanford and UW, just months after the 2020 election that they censored and a 100% of their targets or the opposition to the Biden administration. The Biden administration magically gave them $3,000,000 of your taxpayer funding to upscale them for censoring the 2022 midterms in 2024. That's a 5 year grant, $3,000,000 for Alex Stamos and the rest in in Kate Starbird's groups. They asked for permission to exist, they quote, presented the concept to CISA, The government told them that the government couldn't do it, so they need to exist to fill the government's gaps. They're all funded by the government, But, wait, there's more. They're also a complete revolving door with government. Here, you'll see that the head of CISA, Chris Krebs, in 2020, Right after he left government, the first thing he did was he started a 2 man consultancy firm with the head of the IP, Alex Stamos, the head of the government side of the censorship and the head of the private sector side of the censorship literally went into business together the moment the government guy got kicked out of government. So the head of CISA gets in bed with Stanford University's Alex Stamos. How about the top deputy at CISA, Matt Masterson? What did he do when he left government? Well, he also went to Alex Stamos' Stanford University, Stanford Air and Air Observatory is a fellow right after leaving government. The top 2 guys rotated directly into the exact cutout that they had set up while in government. Alex Stamos and it it runs in reverse. It's not just the government with the revolving door to the universities. From the university side, Alex Stamos, spent 2021 and 2022 directly on CISA's Cyber hygiene advisor subcommittee. Renee DiResta gives lectures, as we will see, at CISA disinformation summits. Kate Starbird, who is the head of EIP's University of Washington unit, headed the mis and disinformation subcommittee at CISA. So, they're concurrently occupying these government advisory posts, in addition to being funded by coordinating with the government, being born out of the government, and rotating, back and forth, totally indistinguishable, and in fact, the whole society model is for them to be in lockstep.

@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan

New emails show DHS created Stanford ‘disinfo’ group that censored speech before 2020 election https://nypost.com/2023/11/06/news/new-emails-show-dhs-created-stanford-disinfo-group-that-censored-speech-before-2020-election/

New emails show DHS created Stanford ‘disinfo’ group that censored speech before 2020 election New emails show officials at the Department of Homeland Security created a Stanford University “disinformation” group that censored Americans’ speech before the 2020 election, according to a House Judiciary Committee report exclusively obtained by The Post. nypost.com
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 1:48 AM

@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl

Who Brought the Knowledge- https://t.co/y3fMqn3U4G

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the mystery of pyramids around the world. Despite being built by different cultures with no contact, these pyramids share identical structures and step patterns. Some lesser-known pyramids, like Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia and the hill in Bosnia, are even older than the Egyptian pyramids. The Fallen Pyramid of Hellenikon in Greece and the walls in Cusco Go, Peru, show similar masonry techniques. Ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia, and Easter Island also display identical carvings and artistic styles. The video suggests the existence of advanced cutting technology, resembling lasers, used in places like Pampungpumpu Bolivia and the Kailash temple in India. These similarities hint at an external influence guiding ancient civilizations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So this is a map of pyramids all around the world, all allegedly built independently of each other and all having identical structures that follow the similar step pattern. Now I know, most historians will tell you, oh, it's just the easiest call structure to build. It's human nature. It's so easy. Why are our 21st century brains not capable of knowing what dozens of ancient civilizations have repeatedly been able to do. We got the famous pyramids of Djoser in Egypt, but everyone knows about those. Across the world, there's Chichen Itza, Pyramid de Los Nichos, Tikal Temple, the Great Pyramid of Cholula among others in Mexico. And then on the other side of the planet, we got Koh Ker and Prasat Baksei Kham Krang in Cambodia. Off the coast of a tiny Japanese island deep within the ocean is the sunken Yonaguni Monument, a supposed 10000 years old, old, older than even the Egyptian pyramids. All with a nearly identical look yet built by completely different cultures with zero contact among each other and thousands of kilometers apart. But this is just the tip. We got way more lesser known pyramids even older than the Egyptian ones that ain't even standing anymore. Like the Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia. Doesn't look so Not now, but used to be a step pyramid a whole 9000 years ago. At least that's what they thought until a more recent radiocarbon analysis shows that the lower parts of this temple go as far back as 28 1000 years. Then this enormous hill in Bosnia was studied, and almost every archaeologist that visited it confirmed that it could not have been naturally formed, perfectly aligning to true north among many other characteristics of pyramids. These studies found out this hidden monument is over 35,000 years old and would be the oldest and largest pyramid in the world hidden under years the vegetation. But the Bosnian government strangely halted further study on this thing for some reason. There's a crazy story behind what they found there, which Honestly, deserves its own video, so I'll probably be dropping that sometime. Fallen Pyramid of Hellenikon in Greece has boulders that are joined so tightly that even a human hair can't fit through the joints without any sort of ancient cement used. Built around 3000 BC, meanwhile, an almost identical masonry techniques was found in these walls in the city of Cusco Go in Peru called Saskia Guaman, over 11,000 kilometers away. And how old are these walls? Mainstream history will tell you they were built around the 15th century, but researchers recently Uncover the writing system built directly within the blocks of these walls that's well over 30,000 years old. Again, a topic that deserves its own video coming soon. This Exact method is also found on a site called Ahu Venapu on the remote Easter Island, older than even their legendary Moai heads, as well as Khafre's Valley Temple in Egypt. How did our ancient ancestors figure out these identical building techniques completely independent of each other when we still have no idea how they did it to this day? Now we get to the Ellsworth mountains in Antarctica. Okay. Get your tinfoil hats ready for this one because this satellite footage from 2016 shows what could be a pyramid made buried in the South Pole. This map from 15/13 by sailor Piri Reis shows a perfectly accurate coastline of Antarctica even though it wasn't officially discovered 300 years later in 18/20. What's weird is this map connects South America to Antarctica, which it could very well be that over 10000 years ago, these 2 continents were connected by a sheet of ice. Researchers His claim this map was sourced from an even more ancient document that survived from the library of Alexandria in Egypt, which was destroyed by the Romans. What if the builders of Giza I left this map as directions as to where else they put pyramids around the world, and the pyramids are just the start. Take a look at these ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia and Easter Island. Four completely separate corners of the world, all with identical carvings and artistic styles used. And again, thousands of kilometers apart Absolutely no contact among each other. Just another coincidence. Right? Now get a load of this one here. I know it sounds crazy, but you'd be surprised. Ancient lasers. Or at least some form of precision cutting technology that is on par with our modern drilling methods. From these perfectly cut stone patterns in Pampungpumpu Bolivia, to the Unfinished obelisk at Os one and the boxes at the Serapim of Saqqara in Egypt. Made of granite, one of the hardest materials ever with insane accuracy only achievable with today's technology. The An Naslar rock in Saudi Arabia literally looks like a giant laser beam just cut right through it. Meanwhile, the Kailash temple in India, which was somehow cut Into a cliff side with perfectly symmetrical hallways carved with copy paste level precision. Not to mention the perfect doorways carved into bar of bar caves 1000 of years earlier. And these star holes found in Flint Quarry, Massachusetts and even all the way in Norway, all indicating some sort of highly advanced drilling or precision laser technology used. The incredible list of similarities among these ancient cultures tells us that they all clearly had some sort of external influence that guided them, which They actually recorded proof of directly into their stone tablets, wall carvings, and hieroglyphics. Alright. That might be enough for now. I think I'll save that for another video, so So keep an eye out for that one if I don't disappear before then.
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 5:08 AM

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Listen carefully… https://t.co/xeNsvAlpRl

Video Transcript AI Summary
We gather here today to protect our country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. We want to show the world that the United States is a loyal friend and a formidable enemy. We ask for your favor and increased faith, as we believe that anything is possible. We still have faith in the best for our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most triumphant and loving god. We come today to play, but tomorrow, they will protect this country from all enemies, foreign, and domestic. Even if it calls the that we unite to convey to the world that there's no better friend, no worse enemy than the United States warrior. And those that would dare to take this republic to the next level for your glory. So as as we, the people, and by the people. A symbol here today. Stretch forth your head of favor and increase in our faith. For you remind us that all things are possible to those that dare to believe. For we still believe that the best
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 12:22 AM

@DramaFreeZone42 - DramaFreeZone

This tells you everything you need to know! 🤬 https://t.co/ldqnxjtRZO

Saved - December 19, 2023 at 9:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ted Cruz's father, Rafael Cruz, once spoke in favor of Fidel Castro but later protested against the United States harboring Batista government criminals. The controversy surrounding Ted Cruz's eligibility to be a presidential candidate due to his Canadian birthplace was fueled by claims that his father's Cuban heritage made him ineligible. However, Ted Cruz's mother's American citizenship allowed him to be a natural-born citizen.

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

🐉⚡️🛞⚡️🐉 Fidel Castro and the Father of US Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz “Around 2013, the current evangelical pastor Rafael Cruz had offered at a forum of the conservative group Freedom Works: “I started to speak in favor of Castro at different rotary clubs around Austin, Texas. I thought he was the country’s salvation.” Ben-Meir and Kaczynski revealed that, the day after Castro entered Havana, January 8, 1959, Cruz Sr. told the student newspaper Daily Texan that: “Castro is an educated man, with no ambitions of power.” On that occasion, he took the opportunity to speak against supporters of Batista and those who called Castro a communist. There were 15 Cuban-born students enrolled at the University of Texas and six took to the streets with two banners and Cuban and 26th of July Movement flags, to protest against the United States’ decision to harbor “Batista government criminals.” Rafael Cruz was carrying a banner that read: “Batista’s gang have paved their way into the U.S. with Cuban bodies. Let the innocent fear not. Let the guilty face their victims, signed by the 26th of July Movement,” as can be seen in the photo that accompanies this article.” “The constitutional clause which requires candidates to be US citizens by birth prompted a rather insipid controversy, fueled by claims that Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada, is not a legitimate candidate. His father is Cuban and became a naturalized American in 2005, but his mother was born in Delaware and, even though she gave birth to him outside the United States, passed on her citizenship to Ted, who did not require a naturalization process and can aspire to the presidency, as George Wilcken Romney, who was born in Mexico, or John McCain, who was born in the Panama Canal Zone, were able to do.” https://havanatimes.org/features/fidel-castro-and-the-father-of-us-presidential-candidate-ted-cruz/

Fidel Castro and the Father of US Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz - Havana Times Not long before putting his hat in the electoral race, Republican senator from Texas Ted Cruz took up an entire hour of a Fox News program to tell the story of his father’s struggle against dictator Fulgencio Batista. havanatimes.org

@Peacepox - Mom

Fidel Castro and the Father of US Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz – Havana http://Times.org https://www.havanatimes.org/?p=110419 “I started to speak in favor of Castro at different rotary clubs around Austin, Texas. I thought he was the country’s salvation.” @TPM @RedState @dailykos

Home - Cascadia Times Cascadia Times publishes environmental journalism from the Cascadia Bioregion: Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, Alaska, Montana, Idaho and Northern California, as well as marine ecosystems in the North Pacific Ocean, the Bering Sea and the Arctic. Cascadia Times investigates governmental and corporate decisions and actions that affect the environment in the Cascadia Bioregion, with an emphasis on making connections between people, wildlife and habitats. We seek not only to inform citizens but to empower the people and organizations working to protect our environmental resources and heritage. times.org
Fidel Castro and the Father of US Presidential Candidate Ted Cruz - Havana Times Not long before putting his hat in the electoral race, Republican senator from Texas Ted Cruz took up an entire hour of a Fox News program to tell the story of his father’s struggle against dictator Fulgencio Batista. havanatimes.org

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

"You write that the president personally approved that insane story in the National Enquirer that was basically that Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK," and that "in fact, President Trump personally demanded that that photo of ... Ted Cruz's dad appear on the front page of the Enquirer," Maddow told Cohen on Tuesday night. "Do you know if Sen. Cruz knows that Donald Trump approved that personally and made that happen personally?" "Well, he does now," Cohen quipped.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a story about President Trump approving an article in the National Enquirer claiming that Ted Cruz's father was involved in JFK's assassination. It is mentioned that Trump personally demanded a photo of Cruz's father to be on the front page. When asked if Senator Cruz knows about this, the response is "he does now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the other sort of unbelievable stories that not only mean literally unbelievable. I believe you. But, you write that the president personally approved that insane story in the National Enquirer that was basically that Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK or was involved with Lee Harvey Oswald. You say that he personally approved it, and in fact, president Trump personally demanded that that photo of Ted Cruz's supposedly, Ted Cruz's dad appear on the front page of the inquirer. Did do your do your do you know if senator Cruz knows that Donald Trump approved that personally and made that happen personally? Oh, he does now.

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

Though Ted Cruz denied the story then and now, Oswald’s lover at the time, Judyth Vary Baker, has now stepped forward to support our scoop! “I was in New Orleans with Lee,” Judyth told The ENQUIRER. “We knew Cruz by his nickname, ‘Angel.’ https://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/ted-cruz-dad-lee-harvey-oswald/

Mistress Declares: Ted Cruz's Dad Was With Lee Harvey Oswald Lee Harvey Oswald's lover has confirmed The National ENQUIRER’s scoop that Sen. Ted Cruz’s father was tied to the plot to murder President John F. Kennedy! nationalenquirer.com

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/why-the-national-enquirer-went-after-michael-flynn-912686659618

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's ally, the National Enquirer, accused Michael Flynn of being a Russian spy. Trump has a history of supporting the Enquirer and has a close relationship with its CEO. This could make Flynn nervous, considering Trump's frequent mention of the Enquirer. The Enquirer's attack on Flynn is significant because it aligns with Trump's past use of the publication to target his opponents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of president Trump's most loyal allies leveled a broadside against Michael Flynn last week. The cover of the National Enquirer declared a world exclusive. Trump catches Russia's White House spy, writing up an insider shocking revelations about Kremlin lies on US soil that are backed up by top White House officials who claimed that Flynn was in essence the Russian spy in Trump's midst. President Trump has settled the national cited the National Enquirer in the past, for instance, in discredited stories linking Ted Cruz's father with the JFK assassination. Basically, he's legitimized the organization, the news organization. Trump has a long relationship with its chief executive, David Pecker, advocating for him to take over Time Magazine in 2013. And Joe pointed out what this Flynn cover means, tweeting, quote, Flynn knows Trump is close friends with Enquirer owner Who effectively hammered past Trump opponents, nervous. Speaker 1: Bob Costa, people will laugh when you bring up National Enquirer, but Donald Trump Speaker 0: Thinks it's a serious Speaker 1: Throughout the primary campaign would have his friend, or or his friend would attack, all of his opponents, whether it was Ted Cruz or Or whether it was Ben Carson, talked about talking about what a horrible surgeon he was, and you could Please tell it was Trump's friend helping Trump against the opponent of the time. And so last week, I mean, if you're general Flynn and you're around Trump, and you're hearing him talk about the inquirer as much as he talks about the inquirer, and you know the relevance it has to him. It certainly should make general Flynn Nervous when suddenly the National Enquirer starts calling him a Russian spy. Perhaps. Talk talk about, You talked you talked to Donald Trump. Yeah. You talked to Donald Trump a lot. Now let me draw it out this way. You talked to Donald Trump an awful lot.
Why the National Enquirer went after Michael Flynn One of President Trump’s most loyal allies leveled a broadside against Michael Flynn last week. The cover of the National Enquirer declared an exclusive: ‘Trump Catches Russsia’s White House Spy.’ msnbc.com

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

https://t.co/Vc0tLkG4jU

@PoohCozy - ⛄️❄️Abominable Brebman❄️⛄️

Listen carefully https://t.co/gr7JtVCbAE

Video Transcript AI Summary
A PAC released a cover story featuring the speaker's wife, a successful model, on the cover of GQ Magazine. The speaker mentioned that he loves Utah and its people, but felt that a risque picture should not have been sent there. The picture was published by a Cruz super PAC, and the speaker expressed his admiration for Heidi Cruz and her children. The speaker pointed out a National Enquirer cover featuring a picture of Ted Cruz's father with Lee Harvey Oswald, which Ted never denied. The speaker acknowledged that he knew nothing about Ted's father or Lee Harvey Oswald, but mentioned the credibility of the National Enquirer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A PAC, which he's very friendly with, released released a cover story on my wife who is a tremendously successful and elegant model, and she was on the cover of GQ Magazine. I think it was GQ. Right? They released this picture, which was, you know, to the people of the state of Utah. I love Utah. I love the people of Utah. But that's not where you wanna necessarily send a risque picture. It was a pack with many of his friends. It was a Cruz super PAC. I have to tell you. I think Heidi Cruz is a great person. I I think it's the best thing he's got going in his kids, if you wanna know the truth. I don't know his father. I met him once. I think he's a lovely guy. I think he's a lovely guy. All I did is point out the fact spat on the cover of the National Enquirer. There was a picture of her him and crazy Lee Harvey Oswald having breakfast. Now Ted never denied that it was his father. This was a magazine that frankly, in many respects, should be very respected. They got OJ. They got Edwards. They got this. I mean, if that was the New York Times, they would have gotten Pulitzer Prizes for their reporting. I know nothing about his father. I know nothing about Lee Harvey Oswald. But there was a picture on the front page of the National Enquirer, which does have credibility. And they're not gonna do pictures like that because they get sued for a lot of money if things are wrong. Okay? A lot of money, and there was a picture. And that's the only thing I
Saved - December 24, 2023 at 7:20 PM

@GTP_Podcast - GameTechPolitics

Listen carefully https://t.co/V7S2I4NV2I

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am inside a Faraday cage, which blocks all signals from entering or leaving. Additionally, there is an 8 channel scrambler to ensure no signals can get in or out. I am doing this because I consider myself an escaped slave from the system. I believe that everyone is a slave to the 9 to 5 existence imposed by the American industrial corporate complex, in collaboration with the government. I encourage people to free themselves from this control and deception. Life is a mysterious and beautiful existence if we are not controlled and manipulated. I will continue to speak out against this system. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are asking what this cage of tinfoil and metal is all about that's around me. It's a Faraday cage. A Faraday cage is a cage which emits no signal and no signal can enter. And you can see here, it's all around, including the floor, all metal in the ceiling. Why am I doing this? Why am I going to this trouble? Oh, in addition to the Faraday cage, we have an 8 channel scrambler which you can see here, I hope, which prevents any signal from getting into this room or leaving this just in case the Faraday cage fails. Why am I doing this? Because I am an escaped slave. A slave to the system that escaped, and I have a loud voice. You think you're not slaves, but you are. The 9 to 5 existence of your current lives is structured by the American industrial corporate complex, complicit with our government. You need to free yourselves It's fun. It's not as me. You don't have to go out and and risk yourself by speaking out loud, but for yourselves. This is not what life is. This is not what life is. Life is a great Mystery, a glorious, unbelievably mysterious, Beautiful existence if you are free from those who control you, provide you with propaganda, lie to you, deceive you. Everyone is looking for this escaped slave. I will not be held, and I will continue to speak. Thank you for
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 4:32 PM

@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl

Nick Bryant - Pt 2 Boys Town https://t.co/Su3SVsdyWi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Boys Town, a Catholic orphanage, became a hub for child molestation by Father James Kelly, who was moved there by the Catholic Church after molesting children in New York. Lawrence e King and Craig Spence were the main pimps in the Franklin scandal network, with connections to Boys Town. They both had successful careers after returning from Southeast Asia, where they likely molested children. Spence hosted parties where powerful people were invited, and his house was wired for blackmail. Henry Vinson, a gay escort service owner, was blackmailed by Spence but refused to provide children. No justice was served, as no one was indicted for child molestation, and a DC grand jury covered it up. Spence's death was suspicious, resembling Epstein's case. Vinson was indicted on a RICO charge but made a deal to avoid a lengthy prison sentence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's Boys Town? It's a Catholic orphanage. It's probably the most famous orphanage in in the world, and it was it was getting kids that fell between the cracks. The number 2 guy at, Boys Town, father James Kelly, He molested a bunch of kids in upstate New York, and then the Catholic church, in its infinite wisdom, moved him to Boys Town where he molested a bunch of other kids. And then eventually, they moved him to a prison in Las Vegas. So I think that Kelly was a compromised pedophile and that he gave King et al access to the boystown kids. And then I and then I've got, I've got a paper trail between Boys Town and Lawrence e King, one of the the primary pimps of the Franklin scandal network. So there's a lot of connections there. And at Boys Town, they're being taken care of. You know? They're being fed well. They're they're getting a good education. A lot of them want to stay there because it's the safest place they've ever been. And a predator like father James Kelly knows that. And it just it gives him carte blanche to to prey on kids. How how how did this network work? There were 2 primary pimps, Lawrence e King and Craig Spence. King King and Spence were in Southeast Asia during Vietnam. King was in Thailand with a top security clearance. I don't know exactly what he was doing, but he had a top security clearance. And Spence was an ABC reporter in Vietnam. Now and they both came from working class, blue collar families. And I'm surmising that both of them got busted molesting kids in Southeast Asia, and that's where they returned. Because as soon as they came back to the United States, their careers just became it was like a skyrocket. Lawrence c King became the manager of the Franklin Credit Union and went from, like $17,000 a year to making 1,000,000. I mean, a lot of that was ill begotten. And Craig Spence went from, ABC correspondent in Vietnam to a major power broker in Washington DC as soon as he got back. And Craig Spence would have these huge parties at his place. He's he's very much like the Epstein character in the Franklin scandal. He His house was wired for audiovisual blackmail. And, what would happen at those parties is It would be like a bunch of power brokers would be invited. You name I mean, it was a who's who of Washington DC in the 19 eighties We'd go to Craig Fence's place. And, and then maybe at 10 or 11, something sexually inappropriate would happen, or someone would fire up a joint or break out a line of coke or or whatever. And the people that were, you know, didn't want any part of that would leave, but the people that wanted to be part of that would stay, and then his entire house was wired for artificial blackmail. So if you stayed, you got blackmailed. That was it. I remember a book called Confessions of a DC Madam, The Politics of Sex, Lies and Blackmail with Henry Benson. He had grown up in Southwest West Virginia in a very religious home. And he was gay, and he had to repress that. And he ultimately became a funeral director, mortician, and moved to Washington DC for his mortuary fortunes. And everything was going really well for him. He was working as a funeral director, and he was making a lot of money at this gay escort service. And then he got a call from Craig Spence, that CIO asset. And and they and then King and Spence would have Henry come to Spence's home, and they would pressure Henry to give him children, and he wouldn't do it. He said, you know, I'm not I'm not gonna I want no part of that. Craig Spence used to get gay escorts from Henry Vincent. He ran a gay escort service. And we're talking in the mid 19 eighties, Craig Spence was spending $25,000 a month on gay escorts for him and his buddies. But Spence started to ask Henry about his life. You know, where did you grow up, and what college did you go to? So and then Spencer started asking him about his escort service and how he ran his escort service, and, and then All of a sudden, Spence stood up and he motioned him, and, and Spence went into a closet, And behind the closet was this, this compartment, and then behind the compartment was a room, and it was all monitors. And Henry was there next to Spence, and then Spence hit a couple of buttons, and then Henry is there on a monitor talking about his escort service. And Spence basically said to him, I blackmail people. You're blackmailed. So that was how Henry got indoctrinated into that. But to his credit, he would not get them children. He just wouldn't, he wouldn't do it. And that Ultimately, I think we had to lead led to his demise, because the Department of Justice came after him pretty hard. Was there any justice served? There are none none whatsoever. That Franklin network, no one got, indicted for molesting any children. And then there was a DC grand jury that covered it all up. Basically, Spence had killed himself. He's like Epstein. There's people that on the Internet that speculate that Spence was murdered. I I think Spence was told either you kill yourself, or we'll kill you. You can pick the time and the place if you kill yourself, because his suicide was pretty bizarre. He was in the Boston Ritz Carlton dressed in a tuxedo, and he overdosed on an antihygressed called Nertriptyline. But anyway, so there were all these articles about blackmail going down by the Washington Times, and then the Washington Post was covering up for the government, saying that there was no black male. And, but Henry Vinson, the guy was just running a gay escort service, and he was indicted on a 46 count RICO indictment. So the government made a deal with him. If you talk, you're gonna spend 295 years in prison. If you keep your mouth shut, we'll just send you away for 5. So he ultimately kept his mouth shut. And it's amazing, because I needed, He was a very important interview for me when I was doing the Franklin scandal. And, and then he ultimately decided to write a book with me about it, which really gets into the Washington DC side of things. Wow. That's, I wanna do a whole episode on that.
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 4:17 PM

@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl

Nick Bryant - Pt 3 Franklin - Epstein https://t.co/gwjlkrBUIn

Video Transcript AI Summary
A former SEAL and CIA agent discusses the similarities between the Franklin scandal and the Epstein case. In both instances, no one was indicted for child molestation despite numerous victims coming forward. Epstein would pay girls to recruit other girls, similar to the Franklin scandal. Epstein, who came from a working-class background, got a teaching job at a prestigious school in New York City. The attorney general, William Barr, allegedly covered up both scandals and has been involved in other questionable activities. Interestingly, Barr's father wrote a science fiction novel about intergalactic sex trafficking. The speaker questions how they would know about this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, I'm a former seal, former CIA guy. I've been all over the world doing dangerous shit, and I was I'm worried to take the interview. I'm not I'm not gonna bullshit you. When I Speaker 1: got his black book, you know, I knew that that was a little dicey, for sure. Speaker 0: Let's just start at the beginning. What what got your attention on this? How did it how did it go from the Franklin scandal to Epstein. Speaker 1: I read that there were other girls that knew about Epstein or that came forward about Epstein, That that grand jury hadn't indicted him on a single count of child molestation, and that's exactly what happened in the Franklin scandal. Nobody was indicted for child molestation, even though we're a bunch of kids. I had a list of 60 kids that had been involved in the Franklin scandal. So, the exact same thing was happening with Epstein. Speaker 0: How were they soliciting them? How did they how did the approach happen? Speaker 1: Epstein just had he would get girls and pay them, like, $200 Mhmm. To get other girls. So and and that's exactly how it works with Franklin, where if you bring someone in, they'll pay you money. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So and and he just had this huge machine that was funneling girls. I mean, he had all these girls And procurers looking for other girls. Speaker 0: Where did he come from? Speaker 1: He he comes from Coney Island, from a working class family in Coney Island. He was a college dropout, and he got a job teaching math at Dalton, Which is the most prestigious school in New York City. It's one of those things, like, with King and Spence, They were in Viet they were in Southeast Asia, and then they come back to America, and then they're all of a sudden, their star rises. The same thing with Epstein. We do not know. William Barr, the attorney general under Donald Trump who covered up Epstein, And actually, he covered up Franklin too because he was the attorney general under Bush I when the Franklin scandal covered up. So he's a he's a really dirty guy. I mean and he's been involved in all kinds of other dirty stuff too. His dad was running Dalton shortly before Epstein got hired there. So people have speculated that his dad had something to do with with Epstein getting hired, but we don't we don't really know. But what's really interesting is William Barr's father wrote a sci fi novel about intergalactic sex trafficking, which is, you know Speaker 0: How would they know? How would they
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 4:18 PM

@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl

Nick Bryant - Pt 4 Clones https://t.co/D7EZ2FWkn7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Juliet Bryant, a victim of Epstein, claims she woke up in a lab on his New Mexico ranch where a doctor in a hazmat suit was harvesting her eggs. The speaker believes that if sheep like Dolly can be cloned, humans can too. They speculate that wealthy individuals may be cloning themselves, given the cost is estimated at $1.5 million. The speaker suggests that ethics and morals are not a concern for these people, and with their resources, cloning is easily achievable. They also mention Epstein's interest in transhumanism, which involves merging human brains with computer chips. The speaker concludes that Epstein and his crew epitomize a lack of ethics and morals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Juliet Bryant. You've mentioned her a couple times during the Juliet Bryant was a victim of Epstein. She was in, Epstein's New Mexico ranch. She kinda passed out or went to sleep, and then she came to, she says, in a laboratory and that there was a doctor that was harvesting, like, in a hazmat suit almost, harvesting her ovums. And I've always thought Dolly, the sheep, was cloned in 1997. If you can clone a sheep, you can clone a human being. And, actually, people are getting, like, their French bulldogs cloned, for, like, $60,000, but it's estimated that you can clone a human being for $1,500,000. So and and and I knew when Dolly got cloned, the sheep, there's gotta be megalomaniac billionaires out there that are plotting themselves. There just there's just gotta be. And and that Epstein crew, I would not surprise if, Juliette Bryant's homes were getting harvested. Do you think that these people are cloning themselves? It wouldn't surprise me. I mean, what would okay. So what would prevent you from cloning yourself? Ethics would be one thing, but these people don't have any ethics. So, so then it's just a matter of money. And what's $1,500,000 to these guys? Nothing. So, unfortunately, there's gonna be probably a little Jeffrey Epstein's running around in 20 or 30 years. And Didn't he actually talk about spreading his DNA? He did, and, he was also into transhumanism. So oh, who knows what was going on there. What exactly is transhumanism? Transhumanism is like combining, like being able to download someone's brain onto a computer chip, stuff like that. I wouldn't be surprised if that was going on because here's the thing. I mean, there's there's no line in the sand of what you're willing to do and and not willing to do. There's no ethics there. There there's no morals there. You're gonna do whatever you want, whatever makes you feel good. And that epitomizes Jeffrey Epstein and his crew.
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 4:20 PM

@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl

Nick Bryant - Pt 5 Maxwell https://t.co/WAySMLIGQ2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maxwell, the daughter of Robert Maxwell, a spy for Israel and Russia, played a significant role in running Jeffrey Epstein's network. Epstein had the money, while Maxwell had the connections. Epstein bought young girls in Eastern Europe, treating them as slaves. Hidden cameras were present in all properties where Epstein exploited minors. The existence of a secret room with monitors, where multiple men watched the footage, suggests collusion and blackmail. The puppet master behind this operation remains unclear, but both the CIA and Israeli intelligence likely had involvement. The goal of this operation is control and power, as politics and government are corrupt. It is crucial to clean out the government and ensure that laws apply to everyone, without exceptions, to combat child trafficking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about Maxwell. How did she play into everything? What was her role? Speaker 1: Well, she was the she was the one that was really hands on running the network, The logistics person. Her father, Robert Maxwell, had a publishing empire, But he was also, a spy for Israel and Russia In the UK and probably the US. Speaker 0: So Maxwell's dad was an Israeli spy. Speaker 1: Yes. His daughter And and Speaker 0: it was running logistics for Jeffrey Epstein. Speaker 1: For Jeffrey Epstein. Yes. Speaker 0: Who has been named by Government officials that he's untouchable because he's in intelligence. Yes. So there's a there's a line Speaker 1: right there. A necessary. Yeah. And, Maxwell had a yacht called Lady Ghislaine, which was named after his daughter, Ghislaine, who was his favorite child, And he jumped off one day, and he he had a very mysterious death. Now according to this Israeli spy that I interviewed, Maxwell put Robert Maxwell put Glenn Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein together, And they were together even before he died, before his mysterious death. And the story is that Epstein had the money, and Maxwell had the connections. And I think that there's some some truth there. Speaker 0: And this this guy was a spy for The Israelis, the UK And and possibly the US, and I believe you named another one. And possibly Russia. Yeah. And are all these do all these countries have people involved in this trafficking ring? Speaker 1: With Jeffrey It's really difficult to know. I mean, Jeffrey Epstein was active in Europe for sure. He was actually buying. I mean, we're not talking renting. He was buying young girls Mhmm. In Eastern Europe. Mhmm. Buying them like like like slaves. It's these these were little girls, man, that were terrorized, And I've seen that Maxwell were you know, they're they were they were vicious To these girls. Speaker 0: I mean, when you rape an 11 year old kid Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: There's nothing that's going to get them over that amount of drama. You've ruined their entire life. Were there hidden cameras at literally every property? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's, every everywhere where Jeffrey Epstein pandered minors, there was there was cameras. Now in his New York, Diggs and that huge townhouse he had, there was an actual room with multiple monitors. I earlier, I was talking about Craig Spence of the Franklin scandal had a room of monitors. Okay. So, Maria Farmer And also, there was 1 other victim that was brought into the room by Epstein, and there were guys, as in multiple men, Looking at the monitors, and the monitors had all the bedrooms and all the bathrooms. And, it was Virginia Giuffre and who was also told about who was also shown the room. So that's a conspiracy right there. I mean, you've got guys sitting in this secret room looking at monitors. I mean, That shows that there's people colluding with Jeffrey Epstein as far as, like, the blackmail. I mean, that's a a smoking gun right there. Speaker 0: The blackmail is still being utilized by somebody. I mean, it's very obvious it's a blackmail operation, so what I'm asking is, you know, Epstein's dead supposedly? And so who's controlling the blackmail? After everything you've dug into, What do you what is the blackmail operation? What is it for? Is it just power? Is there a specific agenda? And Where I mean, we already have multiple lines of connections here with the U. S. Government, with the Israeli government, with the with UK? Sounds like Jeffrey Epstein was an intelligence asset for for in international intelligence asset? Who's the puppet master? Speaker 1: I mean, I think that the CI was certainly involved, and Probably Israeli intelligence, too. There's some dark corner of our intelligence that has that information. This is Omaha Beach. You know, they're not gonna give an edge. That dark corner has the power to make a US attorney stand down When only, constitutionally, the president and the attorney general can make a a US attorney stand on, so so that dark corner Of intelligence harnesses a tremendous amount of power. What do Speaker 0: you think the goal is? Is it control? Speaker 1: It's it's control and power. I mean, that's that's always been the goal. I mean, our politics are really corrupted. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And we ostensibly have a 2 party system. Jesse Ventura, the former governor of, Minnesota, he says it's just like professional wrestling. He said, We sound antagonistic, but that's just part of the script. We're getting paid by the same people. He said politics and professional wrestling are Basically one and the same thing. Speaker 0: It's all theatrics. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: The big uni party. Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, I think most Americans know that Something is wrong with our country. Something is wrong with our government. We we need politicians that are incorrupt. We need people to come forward in federal law enforcement that aren't corrupt, and we really need to clean out our government. Anybody in our government that has anything to do with this really needs To to leave. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And and, yeah, we do need new people, but we need we need people coming in In a system that's not thoroughly perfidious and corrupt, which is the system we have now of of blackmail. That seems to be the checks and balances of our Political system is blackmail. Laws have to apply to everybody regardless of how poor someone is, regardless of how rich someone is. The law has to apply to everybody, and what you get into a very dangerous area as far as a society when you say, well, this law Applies to him, but it doesn't apply to him. That's a that's a when you get into that type of, moral relativism, it's It's very, very dangerous, and that's where we're at right now. We have to make sure that our government Doesn't cover up child abuse anymore. Child trafficking. We have to make sure that our government has that Fundamental level of decency to not cover up child trafficking.
Saved - February 3, 2024 at 7:57 AM

@unbaffle_me - UnBaffle.me

@FiveTimesAugust Some of this starts at 1min 30sec in this important video, for anyone who's memory has faded. https://t.co/k9rZcdW23r

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

"NOBODY IS SAFE!" #COVID19 https://t.co/GeRfWm8jce

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the belief that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. It highlights the dangers of being unvaccinated and the negative impact it has on society. The speakers express frustration and anger towards the unvaccinated, calling for consequences such as being denied healthcare and fired from jobs. They argue that the unvaccinated are a threat to public health and advocate for strict measures, including banning them from certain places. The video also mentions breakthrough cases among the vaccinated but emphasizes that vaccination significantly reduces the risk of severe illness and death. It concludes by urging people to get vaccinated to protect themselves and others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe in Speaker 2: the world. Speaker 3: No one is safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 1: No one is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Speaker 2: This is Speaker 4: a post 9 11 Axiom. Safer, but not yet safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID 19 until everyone is safe. Speaker 4: If the whole world isn't safe, none of safe. Speaker 2: No one is safe. No one is safe. Nobody is safe. Speaker 3: Until we're all safe. Speaker 4: Health experts have been saying nobody is safe. Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. The science safe. Clear. Speaker 2: None of those are safe. There is no safe people. Speaker 3: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe until everyone is safe. Speaker 2: No one's safe. Nobody safe. Nobody's safe. Speaker 3: No one's safe. We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe. Speaker 2: 99.5 percent of people are safe And will survive COVID 19. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture for a lot of vaccines and Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody gonna be safe. Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get the fucking vaccine. Speaker 3: You need to get vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. Speaker 4: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You're the Speaker 2: condemn them, shame them, blame them. The only people that you can blame, the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: They should not be part of polite society. Lunatics who won't take COVID vaccines, walking around lawfully unvaccinated, a psychotic. Speaker 1: If you're willing to walk among us unvaccinated, you are an safe. Speaker 2: You have no right not to be vaccinated. You don't have the right to contaminate someone. Speaker 0: You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are All idiots and losers. Speaker 3: This is a real movement in this country against the unvaccinated. Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life. Speaker 2: Unrepentant, unvaccinated. Speaker 0: They should be removed from the hospital. Speaker 2: Those who refuse to be vaccinated should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, Wheezy. You're Speaker 3: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment For people who choose not to get the shot. Speaker 4: Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Speaker 0: Morons who will not get the shot. Vaccinated. Clowns. Speaker 2: Idiots who think that they can do their own research. Speaker 0: Don't do any of your own research. Speaker 2: Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory circles. This go it alone approach, doing your own research, that should have serious consequences. You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research? That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America. Doing your own research hurts America. Everybody has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not do your own research. I need to do my own research. I don't Speaker 0: have I never understand what that means. Speaker 1: I'm doing my own research. Speaker 2: You can't do your own research unless you're scientists. Oh, do your own research. Speaker 3: Maybe you've told yourself you're playing it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. No. Throw the up and get the vaccine. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. Speaker 2: Get the vaccine, you dopes. Don't be a Speaker 0: Get yourself vaccinated. That's just all there Speaker 1: is true. Speaker 0: There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds up against getting your damn shot. There just isn't. Speaker 3: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have natural immunity. So for me, personally, safe. This vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science. Speaker 2: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection done vaccination. Speaker 3: This is a vaccine that was created to prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the Steam does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you from transmitting Oh my goodness. Reality out. We have to keep that. Safe. Come on. No. You're gonna Fox TV to have the joy. I don't really think that we should allow this kind of misinformation. Speaker 0: When we poke at, well, we know you're gonna Speaker 2: be you're gonna be safe on the COVID better than you. Speaker 3: The virus stops with every vaccinated person. Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading a terrible disease. Speaker 2: And that seen. Our key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines is not to get infected. Speaker 3: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. Speaker 1: When the virus gets to you, you stop Speaker 5: You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. Speaker 2: The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof. Speaker 3: Vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. Speaker 2: 100% effective in preventing COVID. A vaccine prevents you from getting infected. Speaker 3: It is to keep you from getting it and then spreading it. We Have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks. Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 2: Biden tests positive for COVID 19. Speaker 1: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID 19. Speaker 3: Vaccinated people do not Carry the virus. Don't get sick. Speaker 2: CDC director tests positive for COVID 19. Seeing all negative. Pfizer's CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer's CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director Test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again. Joe Biden test positive for COVID again. Speaker 3: Cases up 258%. Set. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts. Speaker 2: So many fully vaccinated people are testing positive. Speaker 3: So So people here are a bit angry. Speaker 2: We are all really concerned about what this means long term. I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. And and almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least one bout of it. Our vaccines work better, than we could have possibly hoped they would work. Speaker 3: We are not the problem. The problem are the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, A direct threat. Speaker 1: It's a Speaker 6: threat to all of us. Speaker 2: The unvaccinated are Speaker 0: a risk to all Speaker 3: of us. People have a right to be protected from the vaccinated. Speaker 2: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not breathing the same air. Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: If you don't vaccinate, you'll be fired. Speaker 2: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be banned from the VA, banned from restaurants, banned From other businesses and colleges. Companies should not treat us as equal. Life's unvaccinated. People under arrest. Speaker 4: Here's the unvaccinated that has Put America in the place that it is. Speaker 2: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. Towards the unvaccinated. I'm curious at the vaccinated. Speaker 0: Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated seems criminal. Speaker 2: Suspects face years behind bars for coughing on police officers Speaker 1: freedom. For them charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Speaker 2: Really? You're killing other people. You're being attacked by unvaccinated. The unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. Is the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing? Is the unvaccinated going to crowded indoor events. Speaker 0: It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Speaker 1: Don't screw your freedom. Speaker 2: We can coerce you. Speaker 3: You're not going to be able helpful to see your family. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them not to show up? Speaker 2: Yes. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's just a huge risk. Speaker 3: If you wanna come out into public, if you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination. Speaker 2: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated janitorial can't travel to the US. Speaker 3: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome. Speaker 0: Our patience is worried. Speaker 2: Why hasn't the president focused more on holding the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: The refusal has cost all of us. Speaker 4: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country. Speaker 0: How come migrants are allowed to come into this country unvaccinated, but world class tennis players are not. Speaker 4: You know? Speaker 1: And, back to our lead story, the pandemic of the Speaker 0: unvaccinated. Fact is this is Pandemic Speaker 3: of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: Experts call it Speaker 3: pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: It's still a pandemic of the unvaccinated. It's a disease of the vaccinated. Speaker 4: It is the unvaccinated who are the problem. Period. End of story. Speaker 0: The unvaccinated also put our economy at risk. This is a tyranny of the safe right now. Speaker 1: The Speaker 0: unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. The unvaccinated. That's the problem. That's the pandemic. The unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: All this is Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: Only pandemic we have is one of the unvaccinated. Pandemic of the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: When you get the vaccine, you will not die. That's right. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 0: It's a simple basic proposition. If you're vaccinated, you are not gonna die. Speaker 1: If you're vaccinated, You don't have a risk. It's as simple as black and white. Speaker 3: You are not going to die if you are vaccinated. That's it. Full stop. Speaker 1: You're unvaccinated, you're at risk. You're vaccinated, you're safe. Speaker 2: A majority of Americans dying from coronavirus are vaccinated. COVID 19 isn't the pandemic of the unvaccinated anymore. We didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's A fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different. Speaker 1: We have 2 Americas, an unvaccinated at risk America and a vaccinated America. Speaker 3: I wear my vaccinated necklace all the Time to say I'm vaccinated. You, the vaccinated, are the last best hope to overcome the unvaccinated minority. I need you to be my apostle. I need you to go out And talked about it. We are seeking to enlist you in a benevolent conspiracy to join in the unfinished war against The sins of the unvaccinated. Safe. Speaker 2: And it's Speaker 3: a war forever war. The war against COVID 19. Speaker 6: The vaccine hesitancy on earth 2 has the potential to compromise all of the hard fought progress that we've seated here on Earth 1. Speaker 0: This is the greatest threat to life that we have ever faced. Speaker 3: Metropolitan areas are now banning all private gatherings. This Bar owner arrested for reopening illegally. Speaker 0: Unvaccinated. We are looking at a winner of severe illness and death. Death. Death. For yourselves, your families. Speaker 2: If the unvaccinated are not to blame, who is? If only we had a vaccine against b s. Speaker 0: A vital part of preparing for hurricane season is to get vaccinated now. Everything is more complicated if you're not vaccinated in a hurricane.
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 1:06 PM

@BabaCugs - BABA

Someone I respect shared this clip w me. I suggest you turn the volume way up.. https://t.co/XanjbP13Ko

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CIA, devolution, and the Q movement, warning about government manipulation and disinformation. They emphasize the importance of critical thinking and avoiding division. The speaker urges viewers to question mainstream narratives and take control of their own understanding of current events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA has been gone since 2021. Cartel is the CIA. That's how they have to get money. Look up devolution. Trump's in power. Okay. Pull up a seat and have a drink, guys. You're gonna need it. And, honestly, this will probably be the video that gets everything. It won't get me banned. It won't get me, canceled. It'll it'll probably be the end of me being able to say anything else to you guys about anything. And I'm not special. I'm just some asshole on the Internet, but I've never served you guys wrong. And you'll never find anything on my page that's like, oh, she's crazy. She doesn't know what she's talking about. I really am careful with what I tell you guys and the things that I say because I don't want you to lose hope. But this right here, I've I've gotta tell you the truth. I I know what you're talking about. I'm gonna tell you what that is. It's something that you would know as Q. This stuff came out in 2017 and I don't want to say it and you guys don't want to hear it, but somebody has to say it somewhere. Since 1986, your government has had a counterintelligence program. This works with your national security and it works with a few different things but it focuses on domestic counterintelligence as well. That's kind of where this goes back to. It's a 159 pages. There's been lots of adding and programs and things like that since then. This right here, that's what that is. They do this in the form of something they've done in the past. But basically, to keep you up to speed, what they did here is they rewarded you by asking questions. Right? And they were dropping some of the intel that come from the late greats like Bill Cooper and others. Then they talked about having Q clearance. Well, fuck these guys. You know, Phil Schneider had a Q clearance. And if I think right, Cooper even said something about it. So they dropped this out on 4chan because they knew the biggest threat was gonna be the people on the right. That's why it was directed this way. And they've ran programs on the left. They're actually running some stuff on the left as well. One's more physical, the other one's more mental. But this has been going on, guys, and, you don't have to believe me. I don't care what you believe. But I've been trying to say this for 2 years in small, tiny bite sized pieces. The intel that originally came down wasn't supposed to get out and it did. So they had to go in and cover that up and put a front man in there. That front man that they're using, guys, is the same kind of man that's on the other side. And I'm I'm gonna try to be careful about saying names here because they're gonna yank this down. But if you think about presidential candidates and presidents, they're actors running the same script. Okay? They tell you what you wanna hear and you believe it. And just like the right believes vehemently and Trump, the left believes the same in Biden. Right? And you look at them and you go, why why would they believe that? They're looking at you the same way and they do what they can to make each side look crazy so that you never get together and find out the truth. As far as this operation that's still running, it's been running for years. The original Intel was right and truth was mixed in with lie. What happened though is they got you guys to focus in on the bullshit and the most shock factor stuff when in fact you actually had all of it in front of you. This was all infiltrated and if you wanna look back to who probably had the biggest impact, it was Julian Assange. And Julian's still sitting there if he's not already 187. You got people on this app and everywhere else trying to get clout. They were doing it back then when it first dropped. Want to write books, want to take a seat in congress, thinking they're gonna get something special. And the way they did this by asking you in the form of questions was centered on somewhat of a game style to where if you get the question right, they're gonna put it up there. You're gonna be acknowledged, and you're gonna be seen as special. And anybody that doesn't agree with you is gonna be seen as stars, all of that. That's been going on since the very beginning, guys. This has been going on since Bible times. There's always corruption. It's nothing new. And the late greats were talking about this. When you guys were told that you're watching a movie, it doesn't mean that what's happening isn't happening. What that actually means is that everything's a movie, that the leaders are actors. Okay? They're all in on it, and they're watching you dance on the stage of the scripted play that they're playing out upon you. They don't care. They do see you less than insects, and, that's the way it's always gonna be. The big goal here was to keep you distracted so that in the background, they could get done what they needed to quickly so that you would be too busy going down the rabbit holes. What was supposed to happen is you were supposed to look behind the curtain. Right? Wizard of Oz. But that got infiltrated to keep you going down the rabbit holes. The holes that lead to somewhere that can't be proven because the news can simply put out an article 5 years later, and it's future proof's past. Right? But when you write the script, of course, you're able to do that. And yet somehow people got thrown off by thinking that there's time travelers involved. And, yes, there is certain things running. But when you control the entire Earth, you can make a news story come out 5 years later because it's right on queue. And I wonder how many people would realize that this system is running in the background with nobody operating the ship. Right? How long could it run before you realized that, we're just kinda automatically doing these things? Is there anybody sitting there? Anybody running it? Or is it AI? But I don't think we're ready to have that conversation yet. AI was involved in this program, and there are some people that were involved as well. But the main goal here was to tell you to share memes, and there's a reason for that. It wasn't to wake up the other side. That was to cause division with the other side to see you as crazy. Why they wanted you to share memes was that so people from the earlier time, 2017, when they started figuring it out and falling off, newcomers would come in and buy into the bullshit. I'm not saying that all the intel was wrong, but it was mix 6040, they said. And what happened is people started focusing on the wrong stuff. You were told to expand your thinking and look at the maps, but instead people focused on the markers. And nobody actually figured out the map but a very small few. And those people aren't gonna come out and say anything because they know it's gonna happen when they do. And a lot of people just wanted to use it for clout, views, clicks, likes, book deals, bullshit, even right here on this app. They try to act like they're privy, like they're fighting some shit with kids in tunnels, and that there's an operation going on, and that's a fucking lie. And I'm one of the only ones that's gonna tell you this. These people are not doing that, and a bunch of them is running stolen valor. And I hate to say that, but shame on you. Shame on you that you let the counter intel get so deep that you'll try to convince other people that you're out here doing something you're not, and I know you're not. It's not hard to figure out. When you've done supply for DOD and you know how things move and, you know how war strategy and history and all that works, yeah, you're lying. And I've already warned you to quit, but it is what it is. CIA is still running. The CIA has always been running. And the sad thing is it's so intricate and so fascinating and truly brilliant that most people don't even realize it. But when you have a mass group of people all believing in one thing, you have to realize something. That's probably not the path you should go. The path that's least traveled is the one you probably need to be on. Because if you have a mass group of people doing this or that, what's happening? Are you really privy to it or did they want you to know? They wanted you to know so that you'd look at things a certain way. And this golden boy that they've set up that's gonna save everything and take down all the chaos and destruction isn't what you think he is. He's playing his part in the script. This way, they can break down the old guard and build the new. And you will never know that you walked right into the new world order as long as it looks good enough for you to accept. And they don't even care if you accept. The stuff that you see in the White House with Hunter Biden, the cocaine, all this shit. It's all to get you to see that it's illegitimate. Right? And they both get paid the same way. Joey boy gets paid his cut for playing dumb, and Trump gets his, part for playing savior. That's the world we're in, guys. There's a lot more that I could say here, but you should look that up. Go look into your counterintelligence programs. That's why I was telling you guys about this convoy thing. And the only reason I'm careful with this is because they put out a legal notice. I told you guys to look into certain people that were running certain operations and to stay away from certain things. It's a mind fuck, guys. While they were telling you to understand MK Ultra, you've actually been MK Ultra. And the only way you're gonna exit out of this matrix is if you come off that left right pillar. And that was even in the drops, that it's not left or right, that it's up to you, that you are the news now. That means quit watching it. You have to write the script and stop reading theirs. I hope I'm not too harsh, guys, and I've cut this back to not say a lot, but there it is.
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@vrosen11 - VRosen

Listen to what Lara Logan says. This isn’t her opinion, this is intel. https://t.co/Iun4ULv22G

Video Transcript AI Summary
A cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor in Baltimore has caused a bridge to collapse, shutting down the I-95 cargo route and the shipping corridor. The attack targeted load-bearing pylons on the bridge, causing significant structural damage. The speaker emphasizes that this is not just a river but a crucial supply chain for the United States, carrying hazardous materials and fuel. The attack is believed to be a state-sponsored cyber attack, rerouting a ship in the middle of the night. The speaker warns that this is part of a larger pattern of America's defenses being systematically dismantled, and urges people to recognize the gravity of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys around. I don't know how they steered it at 8 knots right into the the foundational element of the bridge. They could have dropped anchor. They should have backup systems. You say there may be something that here's the other thing that's concerning me. Why they run to the mic? You have McCabe on this morning on on at Sunrise on CNN saying it's not terrorism. It's not terrorism. It's not it might not be terrorism, but why do you come to the mic right away? These are the type we need facts. We need empirical evidence. We need an investigation. What what is your investigation telling you? Speaker 1: Well, I have a better question for you, Steve. Why are you coming to the mic telling the country that it's not terrorism when your own intelligence, agencies are telling you it is? And I know they are because I didn't make this up. These are not my words. Right? I'm talking to people who are on the inside, some who are on active duty, some who are retired, and everyone literally from critical infrastructure in Department of Homeland Security to the intelligence agencies, they know there's no other it it's there this is a cyber attack on a critical infrastructure corridor for the United States. This is, you know, for those people who think this is just a river, this is in Baltimore, what does this matter? You don't know anything about what you're talking about. This the I ninety four corridor on the eastern seaboard is literally what connects the north and south. And when I talk about hazardous materials, right, this is a brilliant, well planned strategic attack on one of the most important supply chains in the United States of America. The only other one is in the Western side in California. That's the only one that's busier. And what you have does, you you now have shut it down. And when I talk about hazardous materials, what are we talking about here? This is refined fuels. Right? This is propane gas. This is diesel. This is fuel. This is flammable materials. This is oversized loads, nitrogen, chemicals. Everything that you need for your economy to move has literally just been shut down for 4 to 5 years. And and how did they do it? They knew that they had to target 1 of 2 main anchor points on that bridge. There are 2 load bearing pylons that any structural engineer can identify that are on the end of each side of the bridge. These are the ones that are thicker and stronger than anything else on that bridge. And when you hit one of those pounds, when you take that out, the reason you see so much of that bridge collapse instantly is you just bought 50% of the span of that bridge coming crumbling down. And what you don't see beneath the surface of the water sea is absolutely catastrophic. It is a structural nightmare and a logistical nightmare because you have the entire bottom part, the concrete part of that bridge, and you don't know the extent of the structural damage to that, and you won't know it until you pull all of that infrastructure out of there and you get to look at it. And so you're talking 3 to 5 years at best, and what you're talking about here is probably building a new bridge. So what you have effectively done now, you've shut down the I 95 cargo that's above ground. So now you're gonna have to go north to New York. You're gonna have to go south to North Carolina, and your and your your trucks, your hazardous materials are gonna have to go around Baltimore now. They're not gonna be able to go through it. And what else did you do? You shut down the sea corridor, the shipping corridor, because now the port is shut down. Right? And so all those tankers that are out at sea that have hazardous materials on them, those are gonna have to all be rerouted. And why can you not move hazardous materials through the tunnel? Why is this such a big deal? Because they created that bridge because hazardous materials, for example, oversized loads. They don't fit in the tunnel system. Yeah. And there's other, loads that are so dangerous that you they require, a, they require a permit. It takes time to get a permit. It costs money to get a permit. It requires an escort. Right? You've seen it on the highway sometimes. You've seen when they you have these massive oversized loads and they've got escorts all around them, these huge convoys. Well, what do you do on one of the busiest corridors in the United States? You don't shut it down in the day so this can happen. That means you can only move this stuff at night, which automatically impacts the amount of traffic that you can use. The tunnel is going to be overloaded. This is what you call death by a 1,000 cuts. It is an absolutely catastrophic attack on critical infrastructure, and you cannot see it because the cyber attack is unseen. Just like the attack on 2020 on the voting machines that you cannot see. Speaker 0: Okay. I wanna go you just had this big thing with the FBI talking about the what the Chinese Communist Party's cyber hacking unit that they've been monitoring for 10 years, and now they're saying it's out of control. Are your sources telling you that they they feel there's enough information out there that is a cyber attack and is it a state actor or non state actors? Speaker 1: 100%. Yes. They are saying that this is a cyber attack. You didn't have a terrorist group board the ship and commandeer it and take it over. You had somebody take hack into the systems onboard the ship, the GPS system, and reroute that ship. They did it in the middle of the night because they didn't want the crew to be awake. They didn't want everybody to be on full high alert. They wanted everybody to be asleep and you trying to wake people up and rouse people because when when I spoke to one individual who knows who has, let's just say he worked in Baltimore for many, many years and was there when that bridge was opened. He knew when he looked at the security camera video of the harbor, the long version, the 7 minutes. He knew from the start of that video when he looked at that ship that it was not in the channel. You need to be in the channel to make that turn, to have any chance of making that turn. So now you're traveling. That is a river that that flows pretty quickly, Steve, even under normal circumstances. Right? And at a certain point, you're committed. That ship is heavy. The load is heavy. The the water going at a certain speed. You've got very little room to maneuver. So at a certain point, there was absolutely nothing that they could do to stop that ship from the course that it was on because they were not in control of it, and they had all of these other factors coming into play. So when when terrorism and counterterrorism experts look at this, when people who know, critical infrastructure, when you know, there's a number of different people that I've spoke to. Saiva people, when they look at it, they know exactly what they're looking at. And so it's extraordinary that anybody could come out now when they haven't had time to do an investigation, when I know for a fact that they're getting people inside their agencies that are telling them what they're telling me, and they're making public statements that completely contradict what anybody who knows this this terrain who knows it. And I don't just mean the physical terrain, I mean, cyber terrain and, and the terrorism terrain and the, you know, and the critical infrastructure terrain and all of that. I mean, I talked to people whose job after 911 was to identify if you were Al Qaeda and you wanted to capitalize on that attack, how would you do it? They were the people that came up with the the term death by a 1,000 cuts. And what you're looking at now is exactly what they feared terrorist groups would do to to really exploit the advantage that they had after 911 because you are bringing the United States to its knees step by step from within. Speaker 0: Laura, how can people, follow you on this? We'd love to have you back on the next couple of days. How do people social media, podcast, all of your information, your writing, where do people go? Speaker 1: You can find me on x. I'm putting most of this information, out on x. And I I I I want I know I really wanna emphasize, Steve, strongly. We are in an undeclared war right now. And these are not my words. I'm not making this up. This is coming from people who, who really know and who ordinarily would never ever talk to me. But we've reached a point in this city. I think, you know, if you if you look at the quote of 1 of the, one of the intelligence, analysts that I spoke to. Right? I I'm just gonna read it to you very, very briefly. Okay? It's not long and it really sums it up. He said, they have figured out how to bring us down. As long as you stay away from the teeth of the US military, you can pick the US apart. We are arrogant and ignorant. A lethal combination. Obama said they would fundamentally change America and they did. We are in a free fall ride on a roller coaster right now. No breaks, just picking up speed. And I would urge people, watch very carefully the people that tell you that this attack doesn't matter. Stop following them on Twitter. Discount everything they say because they're either totally ignorant and useless or they are plant plant. And there's a lot of anons out there. Right? And I follow a lot of anons, and I appreciate and respect the work that they're doing. But we're in a moment of truth now. We have very very little time. When you start to shut down, you know, hazardous materials and the and the shipping of fuel, you know what that means. It means everything goes up. It means food goes down, you know, the the access to food and critical infrastructure. That means that goes down, prices go up. This is catastrophic for the American people and it's catastrophic for this country. But it is a financial and economic attack. If you're not gonna see tanks rolling down the street, stop looking at the type of, you know, conventional war and saying to yourself, well, if I don't see this, then it means we're okay. You I mean, if people need to understand what they're looking at. And and for those people who say, well, you know, the FBI, isn't it interesting? Christopher Wray just put this big camp terrorism guy. You know, he put him in charge of the FBI office of Baltimore just yesterday, and this is the guy that's out in front of the cameras already. Well, isn't that amazing? Right? Do you believe in coincidences? I don't. I don't believe in coincidences anymore. None of this happens by chance. This happens by design. And the problem that we have is that people in power in this country are complicit in the breakdown of American infrastructure and America's defenses. And Steve, this is one thing that's really important for people to understand. If you step back from this for one single moment, you will notice a pattern developing here. When we left behind $80,000,000,000 of equipment in Afghanistan, nobody said we had to do that. There was no one with a gun to the administration's head saying, get out of Afghanistan by this date. They said, oh, we made a deal with the Taliban. Oh, wait a minute. You made a deal with a bunch of terrorists? You're the world's superpower. You chose a timeline and you chose an exit that resulted in handing $80,000,000,000 of advanced military equipment to your enemies. Well, what did that do? It reduced the advantage that America had on the battlefield because you narrowed the gap by giving them a technology that spent years, cost the taxpayers 100 of 1,000,000, if not 1,000,000,000 of dollars, to develop. You gave that to your enemies. What did the Taliban do? They gave it to Russia. They gave it to China. They gave it to Iran. They gave it to whoever they needed to do to reverse engineer it and figure out how to use it. Then what do you have? Years later remember when, under Obama, when the drone went down? There was a stealth drone that went down over Iran and the Obama administration chose not to recover it. Well, I know people who are on a team of American intelligence operatives doing other work. They were on the ground in Iran. They were literally within less than an hour away from that drone. They had it within arms reach. They could have gone and recovered it, and they were told to stand down. The Obama administration left that stealth technology in the hands of the Orions. Fast forward years later, what do you have happening in Iraq? Oh, you have an attack on a US base where a number of US soldiers died and it's not detected on the radar? Oh, yeah. Because you were using a stealth drone that you reverse engineered. So this has been going on for a very, very long time now. It started under Obama. It was interrupted by Trump, and it was continued under the Biden administration. I I know somebody else who was in USASOC, who was horrified when he was seconded to the state department to find that we had turned off satellite monitoring systems that were our counter nuclear proliferation technology. The guy running that program in the state department was playing cards on his computer, and he was ordered to stand down by his superior officers. There's there's not a direction that you can look and see where we have our leaders, people in power, have been systematically dismantling the defenses of the United States of America. And this attack is a wake up call. Open your eyes and realize what you are facing because they cannot afford for this election to take place. They cannot afford for Donald Trump to come into power, and there's absolutely nothing they will do. There was nothing they will stop at nothing to prevent that from happening. And Donald Trump is just a life raft. This is not about 1 man. You can't gamble everything on 1 man and think he's got the power to fix it all. This is so much bigger than just Donald Trump, but he's the life raft. And without that life raft, you have no chance. Speaker 0: Lara Logan, thank you very much. Amazing. Look forward to having you back on here and following up in detail with your sources. Thank you, ma'am. Wow. Short commercial break
Saved - April 22, 2024 at 12:30 PM

@karma44921039 - karma

Listen carefully https://t.co/1Aog7WBiJ3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Don't comply with government laws, be independent. Refuse to follow orders, like in Bosnia where people resisted lockdowns and fake passports were made. Mass noncompliance weakens the government's power. Stand up for your rights, don't be afraid. Stop complying with unjust rules and take back control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, basically, everyone keeps asking me, how do we win? How do we win against these, like, governments and these elite parasites that keep bringing in these laws? Well, the law is just a word on a piece of paper. Why are you following it? It's called mass noncompliance. Don't comply. Oh, but I'm gonna get in trouble. So what? Don't be afraid. You wanna know what Bosnia did? And I'm from Bosnia. So I was born in former Yugoslavia. I'm half Serbian, and went through a war, lived in a refugee camp, and now I come here, and you're gonna tell me that it's sock boy is gonna tell me what to do. I'm gonna show you a picture of who sock boy looks up to. Klaus. Klaus Schwab. Here's a picture of that, darling. Yeah. That's Klaus. Yeah. That's who Justin Trudeau looks up to. And you guys literally listen to what he says? Well well, the health services screw the health services. Oh, but it's an emergency. So what? It's just a word. Stop complying. The reason why they are going so power hungry now is because so many people complied. The government literally told you to jump off of a bridge and you did it. And then you followed your friends because your friends and neighbors did it. So what? Screw them. If people don't like you, that is not your problem. That is their problem. You have your own life. You need to find that god given right. You are a sovereign human being. You can do what you please. If you don't wanna put something in your body, don't put it in there. There's more of us. There's always someone who thinks exactly like you. So start start being an independent human being. Why are you listening to the government and what they tell you? And I'm gonna say this as well. If they bring in environmental officers and they come onto my property, I'm gonna take your tires. I'm gonna sell them on, like, Facebook Marketplace for $2. Why? Just because. Next time you come on, I'll take your tires and your doors and your alternator. Call the cops. See if I care. What are you gonna do? Send me back to Serbia? Cool. Like, I'm down. So stop being afraid. And you wanna know what they did in Bosnia during 2020? The government's like, yeah, we need to shut down. And Bosnians were like, no. And then government couldn't do anything. And then when they tried bringing in, like, the passports, guess what, like, Serbia did? They're like, yeah, we'll just make fake ones. What what could they do? And then when the cops started to actually enforce, the night curfews, yeah, bunch of people went and jumped them. What are you gonna do? There's more of us than there are them, and only your compliance gives them power. So stop complying. There's no need for wars. There's no need for protest. There's no need for anything. But if you come on my property and you take my chickens, I'm gonna go to my mayor's house. I'm gonna take his couch. That's how we play this. So stop complying. Due to everyone's mass compliance in 2020 and 2021, the these lot lizard elite loser parasites have now gone power hungry. And this is exactly what we told you would happen. So I want everybody to find that fire in them, that sovereign human being, and stop complying. That's it. That's all we
Saved - April 27, 2024 at 9:14 PM

@idontexistTore - Chaos Coordinator

EXCLUSIVE AUDIO https://t.co/WrRqlc6MQc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is upset about border patrol not stopping people crossing the border. They mention concerns about fentanyl and cannabis being taken. The speaker is frustrated with the lack of discretion being used. The secretary's response is dismissive, saying they make money. The conversation turns to baby producers, which the speaker finds inappropriate. The speaker plans to send a letter addressing the issues. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna put extra and, not live at the border in Sunland Park. So I don't have a single border patrol agent. Not one. And people pour over. And so I I'm cranking with the secretary. He knew that was coming. He's not saying the words. I mean, political wants to write an article. Every single major press group in, leftist They're saying that they're worried about Fentanyl, so they're taking all of our cannabis. And they tried to and they're detained people. No. Thank you. Never have done that. We just use discretion, look the other way. But I'm the press also knows. We're doing that order goal is taking a hard stance, and the only way for is either we have to adjust it or I have to send you a letter saying, you're persecuting mistakes. You are not using your discretion. You're not working with me on immigration. And I don't want to send out loud of it, but I'm I'm locked in. Okay. And here's what the secretary said to you, Justin. Well, who cares? They make a lot of money. First of all, it's patience. Has my first question. Very angry. Shame on me. Speaker 1: The only state? What's a baby producer? Speaker 0: Carefully noted if you're working with the laptop. Carefully turn it off and save it at this time. Thank you. Speaker 1: We all know that they're not talking about diapers. Very expensive load to cause you bankruptcy from one loss. Speaker 0: Okay. I thought that was really inappropriate. I mean, it's whatever you all wanna do with that, but it was really inappropriate. Yeah, if you can. Iid held off the press and said, iUh, Iill send it to You know, I got a a nasty, the governor's necklace and so let go of. I can't hear. Okay. Done. I'll be available whenever you are. Alright. Great. Thanks. Bye.
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 12:18 PM

@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy

The more you know... 3 parts. https://t.co/XitscWbNyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
No one controls us, but the country is under a foreign invasion. Courts in America operate under maritime law, not common law or trust law. The deep state formed the District of Columbia to counter the republic. The woke movement co-opts the great awakening to control people's consciousness and freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No one controls you and no one controls me. However, you're right. The country has been invaded. We are under a foreign invasion. And it's important people understand this. So let's talk a little bit history. It wasn't until we pulled back the curtain on the wizard and saw him react that we got to go a deeper dive. And in fact at that time I really had to pull back because I had to like learn more. We had to learn more about common law and trust law. So imagine you have 3 law forms and they only taught us one to keep us stupid. They taught us maritime. So all of the courts right now in America are maritime. They're administrative tribunals. They're actually trafficking you in every single court case. They're opening bonds in your name. They are money changers. They okay. So let's talk basic history. I'm gonna go fast on this. 17/70, 6, we signed our declaration of independence. But only 7 years after that, that's when the deep state came in and they formed the District of Columbia right next door. Because every time you run-in a republic, bringing God's kingdom, the devil has to roll in a counterfeit to confuse the people. Because they the, a republic to the deep state is a very big threat. And I'll tell you about that. Speaker 1: On micro levels too. Anytime we have a it needs the great well, this is big, but the great awakening awakening, they turned it into the woke movement. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: They steal and then make it theirs, and then they prepackage it and give it to the other to the people. Speaker 0: Because they know we live in a consciousness reality. And so long as they can take our attention, they can take our freedom. So long as they can give us benefits and get us locked into a system that we're dependent on, they can take our freedom.

@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy

https://t.co/BPd8Kff4Pm

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1871, corporations took over the states' republics, changing the foundation of the country. The constitution was the trust indenture, but public officials became trustees for the corporations. Wars are controlled by the 1% global elite who funded both sides of conflicts. The republics still exist, as a trust cannot fail without a trustee.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think we live in the land of the free home of the brave? No, we are not free here. What they did was they rolled in their corporation and they started ruling over us at corporate level. But at the time, each of the, forefathers had established their own republics within each state. So each state was its own sovereign nation. Think of Europe, it's its own country. Each state had its own constitution and its own republic. The constitution was the trust indenture. It's the rules by which the public officials, sorry, the public servants, the trustees have to uphold the rules and obligations of the constitution. But what happened in 18/71 is that they rolled in, because you know all wars are banker wars, it's all controlled by the 1% global league. They funded both sides of the war, and they created a civil war. And during that time, they bullied out all of our members of our republics and all of the 35 states that had formed republics at the time in 18/71. So you had a governor, a lieutenant governor, secretary of state, treasurer, house and senate for every single state. All of them vacated. And when they came back 7 years later, they came back as a corporation. So they changed the foundation of our country, and all they can do is lure your attention over here because we're not the keyword there is vacated. Those republics are still standing because a trust cannot fail for lack of a trustee.

@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy

https://t.co/7OHPTbtQJ8

Video Transcript AI Summary
When pulled over by a police officer, receiving a ticket is an accusation, not an indictment. Officers work for a legal fiction, not as public servants. The all caps name on your driver's license is a corporate fiction created at birth. Birth certificates with capital letters signify being born under a corporation, with individuals traded and bonds opened in their name. Profiting from taxes and debts, the system treats people as slaves, but bodies cannot be held accountable for debts they do not owe. This trafficking makes everyone slaves in the same system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When a police officer pulls you over and he gives you a ticket, that's also known as an affidavit. It's also known as an indictment. So you know how many times they've said Trump's been indicted? Well, that's just an accusation. They don't have any jurisdiction over him. He's actually been getting out of those mostly by, yeah. They know what you're saying. You there's 4 ways to present yourself. You can either operate in acceptance. You can conditionally accept and say something like, sure. I'll agree to contract with you if you can prove jurisdiction over me. Or a dishonorable reaction would be to argue, and they'd love to keep us in a state of arguing forever, you know, endless wars. And the the most, dishonorable is to ignore or to be ignorant. Okay? Now these officials have been ignorant with most of the stuff that we serve them. They're just ignoring it, which is very, very, dishonorable. And I'll explain how that's actually gonna work to our benefit. But so when a cop pulls you over, he's giving you a ticket. It's an affidavit of fiction. And we talked about that. Why is it an affidavit of fiction? Speaker 1: Oh, because it doesn't exist. Speaker 0: Because he works for a legal fiction. Because remember, he's not your Speaker 1: He's an illegal Speaker 0: for a corporation. He's not your public servant. He's not your peace officer from the public. My ass. Yeah. He's like, alright. And he's trying to serve you as your corporate fiction because he's gotta get your driver's license, and that's got your all caps name. And your all caps name is the corporate fiction they created when you were born. So the all caps name is not you. Can a corporation run a red light? No. No. So they're charging the corporation Speaker 1: So you're saying since the birth certificate of the capital letters, because I heard this before, you're you're you're being born under a corporation. Speaker 0: Well, you're normal Speaker 1: I've heard everybody is, like, has a has a has a dollar amount of almost like what is it? A 60,000,000 or 600,000,000 each person or something that that of value to the corporation. Am I right in saying that? Speaker 0: Yeah. Because they've been trading you, and, every single time you ever did anything, they open bonds in your name. So when you create an LLC, when you open a bank account, you start a bit, you know, business, you got a home loan or student loan, all that. They were always opening bonds in your name, and they were trading you because the more successful you were, the more taxes you were gonna pay. Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. Speaker 0: So that's how they siphoned all the world's wealth. All And when you died, they took all that money. Soon as you died, they had already claimed your estate, so they took all that money when you died. So going taking people to war is extremely profitable to them. Killing people off for the is extremely profitable to them because they've turned us into slaves, but you cannot hold the body as surety for a debt that the body does not owe. So every time they're doing that, they're trafficking you, which means we're all slaves in the same system.
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 4:00 AM

@upholdreality - COMBATE |🇵🇷

🇸🇾 Things the media never showed you https://t.co/Ma9LZSlmkz

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 12:56 PM

@DisrespectedThe - The Disrespected Trucker

Another great video of commentary. https://t.co/ngT7Tf0047

Video Transcript AI Summary
House Republicans are prioritizing Elon Musk's interests over those of everyday Americans. Their opposition to transparency is baffling, especially for a party claiming to represent the people. The argument that access is needed to combat misinformation is misleading; the individuals involved are treasury employees, not external actors manipulating the system. The Republicans' actions demonstrate a lack of concern for the American people and their tax dollars. Full transparency on government spending is necessary to prove otherwise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: House Republicans don't appear interested in working for everyday Americans. Speaker 1: Yeah. You can shut the fuck up. It baffles me that the self proclaimed party of the people would fight tooth and nail and lie to the American people in your quest to prevent transparency. But continue on. Speaker 0: They are working for Elon Musk and doing the bidding of an unelected, unaccountable, out of control billionaire Speaker 1: You're going to cry about unelected bureaucrats, but I had no problems with them running the government during the last administration because it damn sure wasn't Geriatric Joe. Speaker 0: Why does Elon Musk and his minions need access? Speaker 2: Because there's a lot of misinformation out there. First of all, when you say the Doge team, these are treasury employees. There are two treasury employees, one of whom I personally interviewed in his final round. There is no tinkering with the system. Speaker 0: They're not stopping them because they're not working in the best interest of the American people. Speaker 1: If you were legitimately working for the American people, you would provide full transparency regarding every dime of taxpayer money spent, but you don't care about that. All you're concerned about is protecting the government grift for you and your colleagues. Prove Speaker 0: me wrong.
Saved - February 26, 2025 at 1:56 AM

@piyushmittal - Piyush Mittal 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇬🇪🟧🌊🌈

A 2-minute précis of what got us here https://t.co/ZQ7sFRy4fV

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand why MAGA Republicans resent federal workers, who once held secure, middle-class jobs, embodying the American dream. But that dream has eluded millions, leading to bitterness. Looking back, Democrats controlled Congress for decades post-Great Depression, building labor unions, ensuring fair pay and safe workplaces. Republicans and billionaires fought this, creating the Heritage Foundation and backing Reagan, who implemented trickle-down economics, demonized federal workers, and ignited culture wars. They also waged war on information, targeting history books and news outlets. It's cheaper to misinform you than to support you. Now, many misinformed citizens blame immigrants and federal employees, while Republican leaders enjoy a distorted American dream funded by the working class.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I understand why MAGA Republicans resent federal workers. Federal workers are highly educated Americans who until recently had secured jobs doing what they loved in exchange for a middle class life and retirement. They were living the American dream we were all promised as kids. Go to school, work hard, and have the American dream. But for millions of Americans, that dream never came true, leaving them bitter and looking for someone to blame. So who's to blame? Just look at this chart here for a second. This is the balance of power of Congress over time. After the Great Depression from 1934 to 1996, the entire time Trump claims America was great the first time, Democrats controlled the House for fifty eight out of the sixty two years and the Senate for fifty two out of those sixty two years. And they used those decades of power and control to build labor unions, to guarantee good pay and benefits, to protect your rights as a worker, and to guarantee a safe workplace. The work Democrats did over those sixty years is the definition of the American dream we have today, and we did it all with a significantly lower economic output because the wealth created from that output was taxed fairly. But Republican billionaires fought it the entire time. And after sixty years of losing, they knew they needed a new war, which is why in the seventies, they created the Heritage Foundation, which then propped up an actor named Ronald Reagan. And they gave him a policy playbook called the mandate for leadership, which was basically the 1980 version of project twenty twenty five. And Reagan immediately went to work for them with the trickle down Reaganomics bullshit that destroyed the middle class and exploded the national debt, with the demonization of the federal workforce, and with new culture wars rooted in class, race, gender, orientation, and religion. They paired this all with a war on information because they knew none of this bullshit would stick to a well informed electorate. So they came after history books, universities, and news outlets. And they did all of this for one very simple reason. It's cheaper to feed you misinformation than it is to feed you and your family. Now after forty years, millions of hungry, misinformed citizens look at immigrants, homeless veterans, and federal employees as if they're the enemy, all while Republican leaders and their billionaire donors live out their distorted version of the American dream paid for with the wealth generated by the American working class.
Saved - June 25, 2025 at 9:34 PM

@AidenHunterX - Aiden Hunter

This explains a lot... https://t.co/RJKQaRmwrK

Saved - September 21, 2025 at 10:55 AM

@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK

Full Episode: https://youtu.be/fHyQ5TwT_bk https://t.co/VgzhrMeUAA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Istanbul, Turkey reveals entrances to underground tunnels—the substructure and foundation of the Great Palace Of Constantinople—stretching from Hagia Sophia to the Sea Of Marmara. It is said this was destroyed by the eighteenth and early nineteen hundreds. The Great Palace Of Constantinople is described as estimated two, which is roughly 2,100,000 square feet—more than 35 NFL football fields combined—with a vast network of tunnels beneath the ground. This was not constructed by horses and wagons. This is undeniable proof that there was a civilization here far more advanced than what we're being told, and this proves that evolution is not taking place. Something happened. Technology was lost without a doubt. Excavations occurred 1921-1923 and 1935-1938; less than a quarter of all of the total area covered by the palace has been excavated. Episode 144 of my lunch break.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look what we just found. Over in Istanbul, Turkey. Entrances to underground tunnels. Entrances to the old world. We're told that this is the remains of the Great Palace Of Constantinople. What we see today, the tunnel entrances, the brick work, this represents the substructure of the Great Palace Of Constantinople. They're telling us that this is the foundation, what was underneath the actual structure. Something was on top of this, saying that it once supported the extensive palace complex above. Stretching all the way from the Hagia Sophia, which we just covered, all the way to the shoreline of the Sea Of Marmara. I believe this was destroyed by the finders in the eighteen and early nineteen hundreds. I believe that this structure, this massive palace structure, might have ruined the mainstream story hour if we were all able to see it today. I think that it would have been the number one most incredible structure in the entire world. Right here in Istanbul, Turkey, we are all told that it just gradually fell out of use and into ruins over the centuries. This is a massive lie. This isn't a little building that we're talking about. The Great Palace Of Constantinople covered an estimated two, which is roughly 2,100,000 square feet. 2,100,000. This is more than 35 NFL football fields combined. And like we said, that's just what was on top of the ground. We already know that a massive network of tunnels, rooms, and the rest are all below the ground. This was not constructed by horses and wagons. This is undeniable proof that there was a civilization here far more advanced than what we're being told, and this proves that evolution is not taking place. Something happened. Technology was lost without a doubt. Again and again, we see the exact same thing where our timeline, the finders, begin in the '18 and early nineteen hundreds. We never see the excavations taking place in the fourteen hundreds where the initial excavations were carried out between 1921 and 1923 again, and a much larger excavation took place in 1935 to 1938. And there's no mention of what they found or what they took. There's no mention of what was destroyed. Even to this day, less than a quarter of all of the total area covered by the palace has been excavated because it's underneath all of the buildings. And there it is. Confirmation 100% that we've been correct all along for years now. We're mapping out what's below our feet. We're not speculating anymore. We are proving that the land that we walk on is on top of the old world underground palaces, underground tunnels, their chambers, the rest. And what is the Sultan Ahmed Mosque? Because we already know that it sits on top of the old world foundation. Oh, you have got to be kidding me. We have a massive old world palace that looks exactly like the Hagia Sophia, where they're literally sitting right next door to each other. They sit 500 feet apart, a two to three minute walk door to door. They face each other. If you stand in the square, you can see both domes aligned perfectly, all on top of the old world foundation. A foundation that we were told held a 2,100,000 square foot massive palace. So you have to ask because these structures look so similar. Do you believe that these are actually the remains of the overall structure? Are these just little sections of a massive palace that looked like this throughout this entire 2,100,000 square foot land layout? Do you believe that this was all just destroyed over the centuries like we're being told? Or do you think that somebody came in here and tore it all apart? This is unbelievable. Istanbul, Turkey, I believe, is just the First Floor of a massive old world palace. And what's in this city completely blew my mind, and I cannot wait to show you. We're just getting started today. Welcome to episode 144 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome.
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 1:37 PM

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Full podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cialLfVZqm4&t=2s

View Full Interactive Feed