reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Russia of engaging in disinformation campaigns and planning false flag operations in Eastern Ukraine. When asked for evidence, the speaker refers to declassified intelligence information but does not provide specifics. The speaker emphasizes the need to deter Russia from carrying out these actions and states that making the information public serves this purpose. The other person questions the lack of concrete evidence and expresses skepticism. The speaker defends the credibility of the US government and stresses the importance of protecting sensitive sources and methods in declassifying information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks. Okay. Well, that's quite a mouthful there. So you said actions such as these suggest otherwise, suggest meaning that they suggest they're not interested in talks and they're gonna go ahead with some kind of a what action are you talking about?
Speaker 1: 1, the actions I've just pointed to. The fact What action? The the fact that Russia continues to engage in disinformation campaigns.
Speaker 0: He made an allegation that they might do that. Have they actually done it?
Speaker 1: What we know, Matt, is what we what I have just said, that they have engaged in this activity, in this planning activity. What but let me let me because because, obviously, this is not this is not the first time we've made, these reports public. You'll remember that just a few weeks ago. Oh, I'm sorry.
Speaker 0: You You Made what report public?
Speaker 1: If you let me finish, I will tell you what report we made public. We told you a few weeks ago that we have information indicating Russia also has already prepositioned a group of operatives to conduct a false flag operation in Eastern Ukraine. So that, Matt, to your question, is an action that Russia has already taken.
Speaker 0: An action that you say that they have taken, but you have shown no evidence to to to to confirm that. And I'm gonna get to the next question here, which is what is the evidence that they I mean, this is like crisis actors, really. This is like Alex Jones territory you're getting into now. What evidence do you have to support the idea that there is some propaganda film in the in in the making?
Speaker 1: Matt, this is derived, from information known to the US government. Intelligence information that we have declassified. I think you
Speaker 0: have Okay. Well, where where is it? Where where is this information?
Speaker 1: It is intelligence information that we have declassified.
Speaker 0: Well, where is it? Where is the declassified information?
Speaker 1: I just delivered it.
Speaker 0: But no. You made a series of allegations and statements.
Speaker 1: Would you like us to print out the topper? Because you will see a transcript of this briefing that you can print out for yourself.
Speaker 0: Not evidence, Ned. That's you saying it. That's not evidence. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: What would you like, Matt? I
Speaker 0: I would like to see some proof that you that that that that that that you can show that that
Speaker 1: Matt, you have been
Speaker 0: that that that shows that that that shows that the Russians are doing it. Ned, I've been doing this for
Speaker 1: a while. I know. That was my point. You you have you you have been doing this for quite a while. You know that when we declassify intelligence information, we do so in a means we do so we do so with an eye to protecting sources and methods.
Speaker 0: Not gonna fall. I I remember a lot of things. So where where where is the declassified information other than you coming out here and saying
Speaker 1: Matt, I'm sorry you don't like the format, but we have It's not
Speaker 0: the format. It's the content.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you don't like the content. I'm sorry you I'm sorry you are doubting the information that is in the possession of the US government. No. I I what I'm telling you is that this is information that's available to us. We are making it available to you, in order, for a couple reasons.
1 is to attempt to deter the Russians from going ahead with this activity. 2, in the event we're not able to do that, in the event the Russians do go ahead with this, to make it clear as day, to lay bare the fact that this has always been an attempt on the part of the Russian Federation to fabricate a pretext.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But you don't have any any evidence to back it up other than what you're saying. It's like you're saying, we think we we we have information. The Russians may do this, but you won't tell us what the information is.
Speaker 1: And then when when you're That is the idea behind deterrence, man. That is the idea behind deterrence. It is our hope that the Russians don't go forward with this.
Speaker 0: Is you say, I just gave it to you, but that's not what
Speaker 1: You you seem not to understand. You seem not to understand the idea
Speaker 0: of the terms.
Speaker 1: We are trying to discern. The Russians are moving forward with this type of activity. That is why we are making it public today. If the Russians don't go forward with this, that is not, ipso facto an indication that they never had plans to do so. But
Speaker 0: But then it's unprovable. My my god. What is the evidence that you have that suggests that that that the Russians are even
Speaker 1: planning this? Matt, you need to
Speaker 0: I mean, I'm not saying that they're not, but you just come out and say this and expect us just to to to believe it without you showing a shred of evidence that it's actually true other than when I ask or when anyone else asks, what's the information? You said, well, I just gave it to you, which was just you making a statement.
Speaker 1: Matt, you said yourself, you've been in this business for quite a long time. You know that when we make information, intelligence information public, we do so, in a in a way that protects sensitive sources and methods. You also know that we do so, we declassify information, only when we're confident in that information. If you doubt if you doubt the the credibility of the US government, of the British government, of other governments and wanna, you know, find, solace and information that, the Russians are putting out, that is, that is for you to do.
Speaker 0: I'm not asking what what the Russian government is putting out. And and what do you mean? What is this supposed to be?
@BadoLiz - WizBB
WOW!!!!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 https://t.co/bOXmcTf1M4
Video Transcript AI Summary
You can't sue me for criticizing you. The US Constitution protects my right to speak freely. I'm quoting Supreme Court case law that allows for robust debate, even if it's harsh. You can't silence me. If you don't like it, move to Russia. I demand the immediate termination of Dr. Charissa Gibson and the resignation of the school board for unconstitutional censorship. We have the right to critique you in any lawful way. This is America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know what? You're finished. You're you can count on being sued. Is to me that you think you can supersede the United States Constitution. I've got news for you, school board president Benito Mussolini.
Your power does not supersede that of the US constitution and the first amendment rights of the citizens of this great nation. Let's be very very clear who has the power. It's not government policy. Do not warn me or do not draw me wrong my time. This is my comment, not your comment.
I'm quoting to you now from the United States Supreme Court, 1964 case, New York Times versus Sullivan. This is constitutional case law in this country. This nation is founded on the quote, profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues shall be uninhibited, robust, and wide open. And that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. That's constitutional case law in this nation.
I don't have to be nice to you. Nobody behind me has to be nice to you. If you don't like living in the United States of America, then you can all move to Russia, Cuba, or China. This is the first amendment. My right to critique your fascism, which is what this is, is constitutionally protected.
We've got the scoreboard president saying she'll do better at hitting the moot button in blatant violation of the constitution for her lobbying and her advocacy of unconstitutional censorship. I want you, the school board, to terminate the employment of doctor Charissa Gibson with immediate effect. And after you terminated her employment, I want all of you to tender your resignations for hating on this country. We have a God given constitutional right to critique you, and we can speak in any lawful tone that we see fit. And don't go looking around, Benito, because this is the United States of America.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOM!!!😎😘😘😘 https://t.co/m2ngrjBEnM
Video Transcript AI Summary
After leaving Madison Square Garden, the atmosphere was electric. The crowd erupted in cheers as he entered with Kid Rock and Tucker Carlson, almost like the right-wing Avengers. The support for him was overwhelming and lasted for a long time. The crowd's cheers were deafening, lasting for over a minute. It was an incredible sight to witness, with people screaming at the top of their lungs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When he walked out of Madison Square Garden, it was fucking bananas. Really? It was the whole place was cheering. He walks out to Kid Rock's American Badass with Kid Rock and Tucker Carlson walking in like the right wing Avengers, and the place went nuts. I'm telling you, the Fucking cheers of the crowd were nuts.
I mean, it was overwhelmingly in support of him, and it lasted in a long time. I mean, it was a raw I mean, you had to hear what the Crowd sounded like before we walked in, and then we did. I mean, it was just overwhelming cheers Yes, sir. For, like, over a minute. I mean, just imagine a minute of people screaming at the top of their lungs.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!😂😂😂 https://t.co/ZndeIeVEhM
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recent interview, the president was asked about his low job approval ratings and questioned the reliability of polling these days. The White House spokesperson responded by saying they focus on the president's accomplishments rather than polls. However, when it comes to domestic policy initiatives, they claim that polls show support for the president's agenda. The question is whether only certain polls that align with their agenda are considered valid. The spokesperson was also asked about polls showing that President Biden has been stuck with low approval ratings for two years, as well as polls indicating that the electorate and significant majorities within the Democratic Party believe he is too old and don't want him to run again. The White House was asked if they challenge the accuracy of these dismal polls.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to ask about polling. In February, the president conducted an interview with, I believe it was, Telemundo, and he was asked about the dismal state of his job approval ratings. And he answered in words to this effect, do you know anyone that believes the polling these days? And he talked in some detail about the difficulty of getting people on the phone and comp compiling accurate polling. Whenever you're asked about the president's dismal job approval ratings, you say we're not gonna look at polls.
We we look at his accomplishments. And yet, when you are asked about various domestic policy initiatives, he will say these poll very well. People support what the president wants to do. If you look at the individual subjects on the polling, they support what the president's agenda is. So once and for all, are only certain polls valid in your eyes, the ones that support your agenda?
Or is the polling data that shows that president Biden's been stuck for 2 years at the below forties in his approval ratings. Are those valid? Yeah. The polls that show that the electorate at large and also, significant majorities within the Democratic Party. I believe, that the president is too old.
The polls that show the American people and also significant majorities within the Democratic Party don't want him to run again, and the polls that show his handling of the economy, foreign policy. All of these dismal polls, his job approval ratings, does the White House have any basis to challenged the accuracy of that polling. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
💥BOOM💥 https://t.co/ImjeGATBRR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether Democrats support an open border and asks if noncitizens will be eligible to vote in New York. The other speaker denies this, stating that noncitizens have not been eligible to vote in New York since the 19th century. The first speaker disagrees, mentioning that the New York City Council recently passed a law allowing noncitizens to vote in municipal elections starting in 2023. They argue that this is part of a plan to turn illegal immigrants into voters. The second speaker clarifies that this is only being considered in certain areas, not the entire country. The first speaker expresses concern about the impact on American elections and the constitution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and I I just genuinely wanted to ask a question of my colleagues here because both of you are here in good faith, and I and I respect you as individuals. And
Speaker 1: I I wanna ask you
Speaker 0: a question of what my constituents ask me. Could the Democrats in charge and certainly Democrats here with jurisdiction over the border, could they really be in favor of an open border? And I'm I'm I'm asking you honestly and in good faith. Can I ask, mister chairman? You're from New York.
Thanks to New York City's council, beginning January 9, 2023, more than 800,000 noncitizens will be eligible to vote in municipal elections in New York. Is that do you
Speaker 1: agree with that policy? No. Nor noncitizens will not be eligible to to vote in New York. They never have been well, they they were prior in the 19th century eligible to vote in New York.
Speaker 0: Well, no. This is a recent action. It was just passed in December.
Speaker 1: That that that is not correct. Noncitizens, have not been eligible to vote in New York or for as far as I know, in any other state, since 19th century.
Speaker 0: That's not true. The New York City Council voted in December to allow this. It begins January 9, 2023. Cities in Vermont and Maryland already allow this, and similar measures are under consideration in Illinois, Maine, and and, Massachusetts right now. Mister gentleman, were you?
Speaker 1: Yes. I believe those are, considerations of allowing votes in municipal elections only. Right. But but thank you. That's the point.
Everybody wants to know at home,
Speaker 0: why would they allow this? Guys, they're allowing it because they're gonna turn them into voters. They already are doing this in New York City, largest city in America, and this is the plan of our friends on this side to turn all the illegals into voters. That's it, folks. That's what's going on.
That's the game. That's why the border's open. That's why they've dropped look.
Speaker 1: I don't mean to interrupt you. Miss Cochran
Speaker 0: and all her work in this arena. Yes. I'll I'll yell, mister chairman. Love to hear what you have to say about
Speaker 1: as a New Yorker, I would love to think that New York is the entire country, but it is not. It is not. And consideration is being given to, permitting, noncitizens to vote in New York and, I believe, in, the capital city of Vermont, I forget which that is, but it as as much as I'd like to believe it, New York and Vermont and not the entire country.
Speaker 0: But, mister chairman, that's the whole point. This is what's going on, folks, at home. If you're trying to figure this out, if you're scratching our heads, you're seeing the video, you see droves of people, 2,400,000 people coming over the border illegally. The president allowing the Democrats in charge of congress are allowing it. The deal is they're gonna turn them into voters.
You just heard it. Don't have any problem with that. They celebrate it. Here's the deal. We have a problem with it.
The constitution has a problem with it. American election should be decided by American citizens. That's it. That's what that's what this is about. That's why we're jumping up and down and screaming, my friends on the video who are commenting about this.
That's why we're so upset because our constituents are are are are frightened that we are losing our country. We're losing our security. We're losing our sovereignty because we're gonna allow people from a 160 different countries around the world to come in here and decide our elections. That's it. Here it is on record.
You all heard it. I'm
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Roseanne Barr and Tucker Carlson discuss their belief that society is being controlled by beings called the Nephilim. They argue that these individuals consider themselves gods and believe they are superior to humans. They claim that these "gods" do not care about the environment, their neighbors, or other people's children, suggesting they are not truly human. The speakers speculate whether these beings originated from another planet. They acknowledge that religious people often delve into such theories, but they personally do not know if the Nephilim are responsible for current events. They express concern about the deep deception and disregard for truth in society, emphasizing the need for open-minded historical inquiry. The video concludes with a mention of a related resource called "Ancient Angels."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have to see this clip to believe it. Roseanne Barr and Tucker Carlson are considering the possibility that society is being rung by the Nephilim. Yeah. Check this clip out, and be sure to watch to the end.
Speaker 1: The people who run our society consider themselves gods, and that's why they're not explaining.
Speaker 2: They think they're more than human.
Speaker 1: Oh, obviously.
Speaker 2: Yeah. They I I go they're not even human because humans care about their environment and their neighbors, and humans, care about, You know, other people's children Of
Speaker 1: course.
Speaker 2: And humans care about living things. Yes. But they don't do any of that. And he goes, because they think They're more than human.
Speaker 1: Oh, I noticed.
Speaker 2: That's why they wanna live for real. They think they're like royals in in a rarified Sphere of DNA or something above us. Like, did they come from another planet? You know, when you hear people talk, I can't either.
Speaker 0: But This is the podcast to speculate on it, though.
Speaker 2: Well, because some people some people say you know, a lot of religious people, they're into some deep Rabbit holes of things, and I don't know
Speaker 1: any Well, you can see where they are, though. I mean, I so speaking for myself, I have no idea what's going on. I don't know if this is the Nephilim or I I
Speaker 2: was gonna say
Speaker 0: I don't know. Here we go.
Speaker 2: That's what makes sense.
Speaker 1: I'm what I no. Let's just say heard. I said I don't know Right. Anything about that stuff. Okay?
I'm a very ordinary middle aged man who spent his life Following politics and theology. But I do know that whatever's going on is very deep. Yeah. I've spent my whole life around politicians and seen decisions get made, Interviewed people who run things, and what's happening now is qualitatively different, so different that it's not in the same category at all. No.
This is at all. No. This is hurting people for the sake of hurting them. This is lying for the sake of lying. This is as the devil hates holy water, they hate the truth.
You tell the truth about Anything. It almost doesn't matter what it's about. Doesn't have to be about the next election.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: It can just be about the about history, for example. Mhmm. Telling the truth about history. Why should that offend anybody?
Speaker 2: Really pissed.
Speaker 1: Where everyone's dead, and we can't, of course, change the past. So there's nothing really at stake for us now. Right? You would think people would welcome Open minded historical inquiry to get closer to what actually happened in whatever period or in whatever event. They hate that.
Yes, sir. Well, what what are you watching? You're watching someone who hates the truth because it's true, and there's no possible profit motive that is driving that. There's no political End that is driving that? They hate the truth because it's true.
Now we're in the realm of theology.
Speaker 0: Royal bloodlines, the Nephilim, history being lied Guys, people are starting to get it. If you want more people to get it, you should check out Ancient Angels and send it to a friend because, guys, it's all about this. Love you guys.
@DrC_IET17 - Dr. C IET 17
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM https://t.co/FthAAXsV8n
Video Transcript AI Summary
In America, we have numerous fitness and supplement centers, but we aren't actually fit or healthy. Unlike other countries, we rely on expensive food that lacks nutrition and even harms us. Despite having advanced medical technology, we still have high rates of obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Mental health resources are abundant, yet anxiety, depression, and insomnia prevail. We sleep more, but are always tired. We drink more water, but remain dehydrated. We work harder, yet struggle financially. Our skin regimens are extensive, but we age rapidly. It's perplexing that despite the immense focus and investment in health and beauty, we aren't healthier or more beautiful. The reasons behind this phenomenon are worth considering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the sake of my mental health, I need y'all to check-in with me because I can't be the only one noticing this shit. Right? Why is it that in America, we have more fitness centers than anywhere in the world or any generation before us, but none of us are actually fit? We have more vitamin and supplement centers than anywhere else in the world or any generation before us, but none of us are actually healthy? They don't do that in other countries because in other countries, they get their nutrition from their food, which leads me to my next point.
We pay more on a daily basis just to obtain regular food, and none of it has any healthy or nutritional no properties at all? It's quite the contrary. It's actually poisoning us and making us sick, where we have access to the the the best medical advancements and technology ever to exist? We're still a nation chock full of obese diabetic cancer patients. We have an abundant amount of mental health resources, but we're all suffering from anxiety, depression, or insomnia?
Potentially, all of the above. We sleep more than we ever did. We're always tired. We drink more water than ever before. We're constantly dehydrated.
We work harder than we ever have. We're always fucking poor. We have insane skin regimens, but we're aging in fucking dog years. Like, I just can't fucking wrap my head around it. I seriously can't.
Never before in the history street of America, or in any other country? Have they put such a large amount of money and attention into health and beauty and not been healthy nor beautiful? And why do you think that is?
@BabyD1111229 - 🅾️BlackBetty ⚓️
Boom 💥 https://t.co/lekhaYtCok
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of God and its relationship to time, space, and matter. They argue that the God of the Bible is not affected by these elements and is outside of the universe. They mention that the creation of the universe involved the simultaneous emergence of time, space, and matter. The speaker questions the idea that a spiritual force cannot impact a material body, citing emotions, love, and rationality as examples. They also challenge the reliability of one's own reasoning if the brain is merely a result of chance chemical formations. The transcript ends with a mention of telling the story of the rest of the beginning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Universe. God, spiritual matter, impact on material matter. Okay.
Speaker 1: Your question, where did God come from? Assumes that you're thinking of the wrong obviously, it displays that you're thinking of the wrong God. Because the God of the Bible is not affected by time, space, or matter. If He's affected by time, space, or matter? He's not God.
Time, space, and matter is what we call a continuum. All of them have to come into existence at the same instant. Because if there were matter same. Spontaneously. The Bible answers that in 10 words.
In the beginning, there's time. God created the heaven, there's space. And the earth, God there's matter. So you have time, space, matter, created a trinity of trinities there. Just, you know, time is past, present, future.
Space has length, width, height. Mater has solid, liquid, gas. You have a trinity of trinities created instantaneously, and the God who created them has to be outside of them. If he's limited by time, he's not God. The guy who created this computer is not in the computer?
He's not running around in there changing the numbers on the screen. Okay? The God who created this universe is outside of the universe. He's above it, beyond it, in it, through it. He's he's unaffected by it.
So for God and the concept that a spiritual, force cannot have any effect on a material body, well then, I guess you'd have to explain to me things like emotions and love and hatred and envy and jealousy and and rationality? I mean, if your brain is just a random collection chemicals that form by chance over 1000000000 of years? How on earth can you trust your own reasoning processes and the thoughts that you you think?
Speaker 0: Tell them the story of the rest of the beginning
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!! https://t.co/e1fV8Z0OH9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Before entering the courtroom, it was clear that we were already at a disadvantage. However, throughout the 11-week trial, no evidence was presented against President Trump or the Trump Organization regarding fraud. The use of a consumer fraud statute against my innocent client and the organization, which has greatly impacted the New York skyline, is unjust. This is a politically motivated attempt to portray Donald Trump as a fraudster because his opponents cannot defeat him in the polls. After three years and 11 weeks of trial, it has been concluded that he and the Trump Organization have committed no wrongdoing. It is unfair that even the children have been dragged into this. It is time for America to step up, and only my client, Donald Trump, can lead the way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. Let's remember that before I walked into court, we had already lost. That was clear with his motion for summary judgment before witnesses, before experts. And do I think any of it mattered? I certainly hope so.
But for that was been in the courtroom for the last 11 weeks. You heard that there was not one fact against president Trump. There was not 1 piece of paper that showed anyone committed fraud. And don't forget that section 6312, a consumer fraud statute has been wrongfully used against my client, innocent defendants, the organization, and every employee of the Trump organization, mission, which has single handedly changed the New York skyline, including the building we are in these are special properties. Real estate is an art, not a science.
But you know what else is an art? You know what else isn't a science? Political motivated individuals. She's using this to paint a canvas that Donald Trump is a fraudster because they can't beat him in the polls. They can't beat him in the polls, so she ran on Trump because that was the only way she could win.
And now today, after 11 weeks, after 3 years, we have concluded that he indeed committed no wrong. The Trump Organization committed no wrong, and the kids have been dragged in just like the other defendants, and it is wrong. America needs to step up, and there's only 1 person who can do that. My client, Donald Trump. President Trump, everybody.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses trying to uncover what the Mossad is called when dealing with other intelligence agencies. After asking the prime minister's spokesman, it was revealed that they refer to themselves as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service, or ISIS for short. This name is used when communicating with agencies like the CIA or British intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Subversion, trying to foil plots against the state of Israel, political plots, and others. You tell the story about how you try to find out what the what they call the Mossad when they deal with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable question, in Israel as you can look up, you know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad. We thought we should ask, what shall we call it in English? Which can translate the Hebrew words.
As I said, Mossad is institute. But when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman the best you could do because, officially, the Mossad is under the prime minister's office. And, I think he sort of wondered why he wanna know and all that, so we explained.
And he came up with, the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. I mean, if it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that. Interestingly enough, kind of the British
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/fbPHrLAukG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jake Tapper's past statements about Trump were brought up, including calling his presidency a "nightmare" and pushing the Russia hoax. Tapper allowed Biden to lie about the Hunter Biden laptop on CNN. He's been accused of spreading lies about Trump, comparing him to Hitler. The speaker believes Tapper is biased against Trump, but CNN avoids addressing this. The speaker questions CNN's credibility for allowing Tapper to moderate debates despite his alleged bias.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We thought it was fair game to bring up past statements that Jake Tapper especially has made about Donald Trump in the past. For instance, after Joe Biden was installed in the White House, Jake Tapper said that the long national nightmare of Donald Trump's presidency has finally come to an end. Jake Tapper was one of the lead voices pushing the Russia Russia Russia hoax, which we now, obviously, we always knew it all along, but CNN has been forced to admit that was manufactured by Hillary Clinton and the Democrats. Jake Tapper allowed Joe Biden, to lie on CNN years ago, and I wanted to bring this up this morning, but time didn't allow. I hope CNN will ask Joe Biden if he wants to correct himself when he said on CNN 4 years ago that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation.
Jake Tapper allowed him to spew this slide. Jake Tapper has pushed the Charlottesville hoax lie that they've been ramming against president Trump for years. He also has frequently compared president Trump to Hitler. So this is a guy who has clearly made his opinions about president Trump known. It's not me making that up.
This is who he is. He's an anti Trump leftist who's a former Democrat staffer, yet he's given the privilege of hosting this debate. And so, I thought it was worthy bringing those comments up. Clearly, CNN doesn't want their audience to know the truth about fake tapper. They want people to believe they're truly the most trusted name in news, yet they can't even handle a spokesperson for the leading candidate in this race, bringing up facts and truths about what one of their debate moderates moderators have said.
@ClownWorld_ - Clown World ™ 🤡
HOLY SH!T 🤯 https://t.co/c5qnlFHXHL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris had a rally in Atlanta with Megan Thee Stallion to boost attendance. Fulton County allegedly buses in homeless people for events to make them look full. This tactic is not unique to Harris, as it has been rumored to happen during elections as well. The rally may not accurately reflect true support for Harris.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Just in case you did not know it on yesterday, Kamala Kamala Harris had a rally in Atlanta and it gave you, like, oh, Atlanta's hype for her. Like, people are so excited for her. I know you felt it. I know you saw it.
She even brought out ratchet Megan Thee Stallion, shaking her butt, twerking for a political rally, talking about hotties for hair. So that did not turn your stomach. Like, that is pandering, like, if you've ever heard it. But but that's not the ketchum. Do not let that rally looking, fool fool you because Fulton County has been doing this for years.
Before the rallies, they get busloads and they go pick up the homeless people. They offer them food, drink, and a little change to come to the rally so the rallies will look full. Now you got to realize she just dealt with the rally, and I want to say it was Pennsylvania where it was less than 60 people. It was quite embarrassing for her, and so that's not going to go down in this blackety black city. Okay?
It's just not going to go down. They are absolutely going to make sure that thing looks packed out. So I want you to know that's why you only saw certain angles as well, but I want you to know people aren't for her like that. That's that's why they're having to pick up homeless people. That being said, I'm a give her this.
She's not the only one. It is a very Fulton County, Atlanta thing. You can see it, before all of the democratic, rallies. You can see it. Now I've never seen them pick up people and pay them to vote democratic, but it's been said for years for years that they literally will go pick up homeless people on the days of the election and pay them to vote.
They need the money, so they do it because what poor and desperate is what they're banking on. I haven't seen that, but I have absolutely and I saw yesterday them picking up the homeless people to come to the rally. So do not be fooled. They'll tell you it's a lie. I'm telling you.
This right here, 1,000 percent in
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!🎯🎯🎯 https://t.co/MPU9yw6IT1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump has survived two assassination attempts, including one this weekend outside a golf course. The speaker believes it's too late to address the rhetoric surrounding Trump, arguing that claims of him being a threat to democracy and that the country will end if he's re-elected may have contributed to the attempts on his life. The speaker wants Democrats to acknowledge that if Trump wins, democracy, the Constitution, and the country will not end, and that there will be no dictatorship or bloodbath. They believe hyperbolic statements about Trump should stop, as they have not been true in the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have tried to kill this man twice. Okay? He he got shot in the ear and this guy was sitting up shop outside of a golf course to try to kill him this weekend. And, I know it I know after something like this happens, it's very fashionable to, you know, talk about rhetoric on both sides. Donald Trump is the target.
Okay? He's the current target and it's happening and it's happened again. And I just honestly, we we have to have a conversation about elections. If you lose an election, the country is not come to an end. Okay?
What I want Democrats to do, honestly, is to say, it's okay. Like, if if Donald Trump wins, democracy will not end, the constitution will not end, we're not gonna live in a dictatorship, there will not be a bloodbath. All the things they say that are totally fabricated to me would be a good day to stop doing that. The most important thing that could possibly happen, in my opinion, is for everybody to agree, especially Democrats, that the country is not going to be irreparably damaged if Democrats lose. That where the constitution is not gonna go away.
Democracy is not gonna come to an end. There will be no bloodbath. There will be no dictatorship on day 1, which they all say all day long on this network and others. If everyone could just agree that that kind of hyperbolic statement will not take place anymore and that it's not been true every time it's been said, that would be a step in the right direction. And I know everybody's talking today about all the rhetoric in this country and what are we gonna do to fix it going forward.
Folks, it's too late. It's too late in my opinion because all the rhetoric about Donald Trump over the last several years that he's a threat to democracy, that the country will come to an end if he gets elected president again. You know, even over the weekend we had people blaming him and JD Vance for a bomb threat in Springfield. Well, if you have believed that over the weekend, then how can you not believe that the rhetoric, leading up to today is not somehow responsible for the fact that this man has now survived, 2 assassination attempts. So what I want Democrats to do, honestly, is to say it's okay, like, if if Donald Trump wins, democracy will not end, the constitution will not end, we're not gonna live in a dictatorship, there will not be a bloodbath, all the things they say that are totally fabricated to me, it'll be a good day to stop doing that.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!🎯 https://t.co/ndiPr5i3Fr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ranking member Raskin is creating a "boogeyman" that isn't there. The speaker authored the EPA chapter on project 2020 5, but did not work with President Trump or his campaign. The speaker is not vying for a position in the next administration and now lives in Mississippi.
The leading candidate is running away from policy actions that make Americans' lives difficult. Vice President Kamala Harris did not answer when asked if Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago. Most Americans are struggling with expensive gas, electricity, and groceries due to the Biden-Harris Administration's day 1 energy policies.
Since January 2021, President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Congressional Democrats have taken over 250 actions that make it harder to produce energy in America. Actions include stopping the Keystone XL Pipeline, issuing a moratorium on new oil and gas permits on federal lands, greenlighting Putin's Nord Stream 2 pipeline, rejoining the Paris climate agreement, blocking the Twin Metals mine, and slowing permits for LNG facilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a prepared opening statement that I'll get into in just a second. But ranking member Raskin, you reiterated and have created a boogeyman that just isn't there. I did author the EPA chapter on project 2020 5. But in the course of that, I did not work with president Trump, with any of the people who work for him directly, or his campaign. And it is very misleading to suggest that there's any coordination there.
Because I can personally tell you, it did not happen. And I am not vying for a position in the next administration. I've actually left DC and I've moved to a small town in Mississippi, where I interact every day with people who live outside this bubble of gas lighting and misleading. And they actually are dealing with the consequences caused by policy decisions of this administration that isn't defined by progress, but defined by creating unnecessary hardship. I understand why it's hard to think about conservative policies for quite a while.
And the mandate committed to representing the position of the broader conservative movement than any one candidate or person. And I understand why there is the creation of this boogeyman because your leading candidate is running away from policy actions she has taken that make Americans' lives much more difficult. In fact, Vice President Kamala Harris was recently asked on national television the following question. When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were 4 years ago? She said a lot of words, but she did not answer the question.
Because the reality is, most Americans are not better off. Most Americans are struggling to deal with expensive gas, expensive electricity, and high cost goods and groceries that have created financial burdens that Americans have had to deal with throughout the Biden Harris Administration. Their day 1 energy policies are a key driver behind Americans' increasing financial distress. From President Biden's promise to end all fossil fuels, alongside Vice President Kamala Harris' commitment to ban fracking, Americans have suffered under their radical agenda. From the energy perspective, this has the industries, mainly coal, oil, and natural gas, that still provide 80% of our daily energy needs.
A recent report from the Institute of Energy Research has been tracking these actions and they've found that since January 2021, President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Congressional Democrats have taken over 2 50 actions that make it harder to produce energy in America. This has included stopping construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline that immediately cut 11,000 domestic jobs, including thousands of union jobs. Issuing a moratorium on new oil and gas permits on on federal lands. Greenlighting Putin's Nord Stream 2 pipeline, while shuttering the development of US pipelines along the East Coast. Rejoining the disastrous Paris climate agreement 15 years ago.
Blocking the Twin Metals mine, shuttering US Steelworker jobs in Minnesota and cutting off access to critical minerals that we need more and more of. And instead, this administration is making us more and more dependent on China. Slowing permits for LNG facilities from an average of 7 weeks to 11 months. Then completely halting permits for new LNG facilities altogether. Mandating they put gas in their car, pay their electricity bills, or go to the grocery store.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
BOOOOM https://t.co/yfVl6rXPXM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leaving elderly patients alone in hospitals is akin to neglecting a baby; it can lead to serious harm. Hospitals often prioritize vaccinations and medications like antacids and heparin, which can impair nutrient absorption and disrupt sleep. This lack of rest can lead to psychosis, prompting unnecessary psychiatric medication. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently overprescribed, damaging gut health and increasing anxiety and infection risks. Simple interventions like vitamin D, magnesium, and glutathione are often overlooked despite their benefits. Patients need strong advocates to ensure their care and safety in hospitals, as the system can be unresponsive and negligent. Share your hospital experiences to raise awareness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For them or their family members of what hospital negligence has done and all the deaths that I have encountered that in my medical career seeing this happen. 1st and foremost, if you leave an elderly individual in the hospital alone, you should be imprisoned for elder abuse. Why? It's equivalent of leaving a the equivalent of leaving a 6 month old baby alone at home without anyone there. Nobody would ever do that.
But you're doing the same thing to an elderly individual because that hospital if you have no patient advocate, that hospital is going to do what ever they want and nobody's going to stop them. Alright. So first thing, when you get into the hospital, the first thing they try to push on you is a Pneuma vax and a flu shot. Why would I wanna put these heavy metals in my body? Now I can't list the names because they're gonna go put the red fact check information on this post that I don't want, but do your own research.
Why would I want to put something in to suppress my immune system when I'm already sick? I didn't come here for that purpose. I came here to fix my illness, not to receive 2 other shots. That's first and foremost. Secondly, one of the most common medications they give everyone in these hospitals are antacids or PPIs, proton pump inhibitors.
What they end up doing is they impair nutrient and mineral absorption. So now you're not absorbing magnesium, you're not absorbing selenium and it trace minerals. Well, you can have proper cellular function, and you're going to have more side effects when you're not absorbing nutrients, which they're not even providing you. They will never provide you with a nutrient ID there. Well, one big thing is this heparin.
So they give everybody heparin shots 3 times a day. Heparin is a blood thinner. And, I was discussing with the nurse, why are you giving this patient heparin 3 times a day when they're getting up walking, they're eating, they're going to the bathroom, and they're going to sleep in this bed. Don't you do the same thing at home? Would you give yourself a heparin injection at home every night?
They say, no, I wouldn't. So why are you doing it to the patients causing more harm? Okay. The patients can't sleep. Every 2 hours, they get interrupted all the time by nursing staff, by, beeping machines.
Well, over a period of time, without patients not seeing the sun, they're not going outside, they're stuck in a room with artificial light, they're gonna go into a psychosis. And they're not sleeping there and and their cortisol level is gonna shoot up, their immune system is going to be even more suppressed. No one thinks or has the brain capacity to say, let's let this patient sleep for 8 hours so they can get a great night and feel better tomorrow. No. It doesn't exist in a hospital.
So the longer you are there, the higher your chances of morbidity and mortality, which is equivalent to death. So now that you're in a psychosis because you haven't slept in a week, they wanna put you on psych meds. Geniuses. Right? Instead of letting you sleep in a room for 8 hours.
Okay. And then if you end up getting, contracting a small infection, instead of pinpointing what antibiotic they should give you, they'll throw an AK 47 of vancomycin and zosin, which is very broad spectrum. The problem is this kills off your gut microbiome. And we know through studies that killing off the gut microbiome will lead to severe anxiety and depression, which also suppresses your immune system, which makes you more susceptible to having repeat infections and having superimposed infections and then contracting, things like hospital acquired pneumonia or a hospital acquired urinary tract infection. So they don't really think about what the consequences are of what they're doing.
I asked a nurse in a hospital when I was being a patient advocate for somebody, hey. Have you checked this patient's vitamin d three levels? You know, they have malabsorption issues? No. We don't do that.
Well, don't you think it's beneficial to give that patient a shot of vitamin d 3 when they're in the hospital, get their levels above 60? There's published studies showing, there's reduction in morbidity and mortality. There is a decreased stay in the ICU when patients have optimal vitamin d3 levels. But something that cost them $2 to give you a shot of vitamin d3, they refuse to do. Then you'll talk to them, can you give the patient magnesium for proper cellular function?
Oh, no. We don't do that. The magnesium levels are normal. Well, yes. Because you're not testing red blood cell magnesium.
You're not testing the right type. You're not doing the labs correctly to understand. Anyone can receive magnesium. As long as they have proper kidney function, you can give it to anyone in high doses, and they're going to do absolutely great, and it's going to help them. Hey.
Can you give this patient glutathione with an infection? Oh, no. We don't know what that is. Oh, you don't know what the master antioxidant of the body is. So you're willing to pump in 1,000 of dollars of antibiotics for your own profit, but you won't help that patient receive a glutathione infusion in the hospital.
Makes sense. Then you ask them something about vitamin c. Hey, can you give this patient high dose IV vitamin c that was severe infection? You can see the published studies showing that there's increased efficacy of providing IV vitamin c when patients have a bacterial infection. Oh, no.
Sorry. We don't do that. The bottle of vitamin c cost $50. They refuse to spend $50 to get you out of that hospital because they don't wanna give you that medication. So I've received thousands of stories.
Please share your story below. I know this video is long, but it's very informative, and you have to advocate for your patient. You cannot let leave anybody alone in a hospital. You have no idea what they're capable of doing. You have to watch them like a hawk.
They will slip something in without even knowing or explaining it. And guess what? They have zero liability. You can't do anything about it. Imagine imagine you're a prisoner in jail, and you're being assaulted by another prisoner.
What are you gonna do? Call the police? They're not gonna do anything. It's the same thing in a hospital. There's nothing you can do other than advocate and fight for your patient, and I urge everybody to do so.
Thank you for listening. Drop your horror story from the hospital below.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
KABOOOOOOOM!!!😎🇺🇸🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/yaSW91EkY7
Video Transcript AI Summary
When flying with loved ones, do you pray for a safe landing or for the pilot's skin color? The answer is clear: we prioritize safety over superficial traits. As President Trump noted, this is common sense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you are flying on an airplane with your loved ones, which every one of us in this room has, do you pray that, your plane lands safely and gets you to your destination? Or do you pray that the pilot has a certain skin color? I think we all know the answer to that question. And as president Trump said yesterday, it's common sense. It's rock curly.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!😎🇺🇸🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/fshg9T4qfD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's behave maturely. They are kindly offering their time to address your questions. There's no need to shout at them like children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Common sense. Yeah. Thank you. Can you direct traffic? Yeah.
Thanks. Let's act like adults here. They are generously offering their time to answer your questions. You don't need to scream at them like a bunch of school children.
@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo
BOOOOOOOM!!!😎🇺🇸 https://t.co/kb4QizQ64w
Video Transcript AI Summary
The press is focused on narratives, but I am focused on peace. Characterizing my stance as pro-Russia or anything else is garbage. I was elected to bring peace to this conflict, and I'm working with both sides in a way that only I can.
Only I can bring them to the table to end the killing. Being behind the scenes, I am laser-focused on making that happen. We're closer today than ever before because of my leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To the previous question from the Washington Post, the press is interested in narratives. Our president is interested in peace. So we will get characterized one way or another. Oh, your stance is pro Russia or pro it's all garbage. The president got elected to bring peace in this conflict, and he is working both with both sides in a way that only president Trump can.
Let's be clear. Only president Trump can to bring them to the table to end the killing. And I can tell you from being behind the scenes, he is laser focused on making that happen, and we're closer today than we've ever been because of his leadership.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two."
"For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to."
"We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity."
"When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity."
"This is a criminal cartel."
"since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent."
"This is not an allegation."
"This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand."
"And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the translators are gone, and the livestream is waning, which means that if we just listen to my colleague, Matthias, the best thing in the world would be to leave it to you, the people. Now it's up to you to share what clearly based on the cavernous emptiness we see in all of these spaces is only going to be heard if you share it. So it feels very appropriate that I should be the one with the quietest voice. But let's let that lion roar. Shall we?
I'm done talking about COVID, and I'm done talking about SARS CoV two, and I'm done for a very simple reason. For a hundred and ten years, we, the people of the world, have been lied to. We're a group of very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite.
When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words. Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this.
This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit? Well, I'm going to tell you since its formation in the nineteen forties, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation.
This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand. And they use a four step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale for the thing that they're going to do, and then they deploy and profit from it. And in violation of fifth