reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
University, Philanthropy and Cancel Culture. Back in September, 100 "independent" scientists at Stanford wrote a cancel culture letter to scream at Scot Atlas. Many of their points are now laughable. This wont age well. But let's see how they came to such woke outrage.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
As many of you know, Stanford attracts a lot of money but one of the more noticeable donations is from Bill and Melinda Gates and is known as the Stanford Computer Science center. Woke Outrage Letter link below. https://drive.google.com/file/d/130OXUjdnwHmfmbiEZWK9d354QHaRi0-r/view
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
In addition to donating a Computer Science building, they also gifted $50M to the school for Vaccine development. https://philanthropynewsdigest.org/news/gates-foundation-awards-stanford-50-million-for-vaccine-discovery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gates_Computer_Science_Building,_Stanford
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
In fact there are over 151 grants to Stanford listed on the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation website. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=Stanford#jump-nav-anchor0
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
That is not a nice micro-aggression. Maybe "crackpot" is a better term for a MD in Neurology.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
So Bill doesn't Like Scot. Bill has lots of investments in Vaccines. How should neutralize Scot? Maybe some of the recipients of his grants will get together and write a woke outrage cancel culture letter to underscore the diversity of thought found at a University.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Let's take a look at the signatories of this letter, shall we? First up Phillip Pizzo - Surprise.. He has Gates money.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Lucy Shapiro, PhD. Don't see any Gates Money. That is shocking. Impressive background but many industrial relationships worth noting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_Shapiro
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Melissa Bondy, PhD. Quick glance, didnt see much https://med.stanford.edu/school/leadership/dean/updates/melissa-bondy.html
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Charles Prober, MD Some associations and accolades with Gates but this one needs more digging. https://news.stanford.edu/news/2015/february/gates_cambridge-winners-021215.html
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
You see, some of their students get scholarships from Gates so there are indirect influences that require a bit more digging.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Julie Parsonnet, MD Bingo ttps://news.stanford.edu/news/2008/november19/med-mcp-111908.html
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Steven Goodman, MD, MHS, PhD Involved in the Institute for Science and Policy which has Gates money. https://institute.dmns.org/perspectives/posts/covid-19-myths-misinformation-and-misunderstandings/
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
David Relman, MD https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/cv_relman_09192016.pdf CV has Gates Money
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Steve Luby, MD Yet again... Maybe we should just call it Gatesford university?
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
https://ccas.creighton.edu/news/alumni-merit-award-winner-2016-stephen-luby Harry Greenberg, MD Has some cozy interactions with Gates but havent dug deep here as the trend is becoming pretty clear. https://sm.stanford.edu/archive/stanmed/2009spring/article5.html
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Ann Arvin, MD. Serves on NIAID Advisory panel with Gates members. Works with the WHO https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Arvin I've only covered the few names at the top of the letter but at the moment this seems pretty overt. Uncle Bill doesnt like anyone who challenges his vax goals.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
So what happens? Everyone in the Gates cult gangs up on the independent thinkers to demand the university should contain only their thoughts. Monoversity would be a better name and this is a historical stain on the exceptional Stanford reputation.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Surprised? We witnessed the Yellow Snow Memorandum resort to the same type of hypocritical behavior. They crucified Scot for his Hoover connections The monopolistic ethos of their philanthropist shines through in the behavior of their grant recipients.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
The John Snow Memorandum = Nerd Sweater Mafia These authors are infamous for attacking the Great Barrington Declaration as being some @AIER libertarian think tank. Let’s stoop to their level and see how they take a dose of their same immature associative fallacy medicine.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
I apologize for mis-spelling Scott’s name. (Two Ts). He left Twitter when the cancel culture purged Twitter in 2021. https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/12/scott-atlas-deletes-twitter-account/
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Just so we are clear about philanthropy. The Gates Foundation has over $430M in Pfizer/BioNTech stock. Nothing in Merck’s Ivermectin. NIH has patent royalties for Moderna. But none of this matters. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.axios.com/moderna-nih-coronavirus-vaccine-ownership-agreements-22051c42-2dee-4b19-938d-099afd71f6a0.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fool.com/amp/investing/2020/09/24/4-coronavirus-vaccine-stocks-the-bill-melinda-gate/
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
The holdings are not all BNTX. The 437M is spread across multiple vaccine bets but BioNTech is up 4X since last March and now valued over $100M trading at $107/share today. It was at $13 in Oct 2019.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
Remember all the outrage when Billionaire Pedophile Epstein was caught buying university influence? Wrecked a department at MIT. Not suggesting Bill is this evil but it’s a reminder that these conflicts are important to have on the table when his influence network is so large.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
This is where it gets interesting. Gates encourages AZ/Oxford to not take the free vax for all route. That can’t be good for Pfizer. Also set up CEPI to try to control vax pricing. Collusion through NGO/Philanthropy while stock portfolio banking on ROI? https://www.google.com/amp/s/khn.org/news/rather-than-give-away-its-covid-vaccine-oxford-makes-a-deal-with-drugmaker/amp/
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
FAQs. What’s laughable? 1)It opens with Masks! DanMask Source control is bunk. Many comparative jurisdictions show no effect or worse outcomes. @ianmSC is a good source. @mamasaurusMeg and @KristenMeghan are professional OSHA PPE- they agree with Scott Cloth aerosols droplets.
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
2)Asymptomatic spread. Not a driver. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774102 3)how many Stanford brainiacs does it take to use EndNote? More than 100? Not a single citation required to character assassinate a colleague? That’s why it’s a woke embarrassment. https://t.co/AtXVLTxWkc
@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan
@threadreaderapp unroll
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
HOLY CRAP! Two sites stand out from the #pfizerdocuments randomization log as major anomalies.... Site 1231 and Site 4444 You are not going to believe this..... @AaronSiriSG @fynn_fan @ClareCraigPath @profnfenton
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
The biggest recruiter by far is site 1231. In Argentina. Well of course, for a joint German-American drug where else? Site 1231 recruited 4501 patients. That is 10% of the patients AT ONE SITE. ALL 4501 patients were recruited in 3 weeks. WOW!
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
This is site 1231 from the @ICANdecide log Recognise the name? We'll come back to him in a sec....
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
The site is supposed to be the Military Central Hospital. That's interesting. It's also an interesting logo. Seems to have given David Martin ideas for his website logo, but probably just coincidence. I dunno...
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Anyway, it seems a bit odd that a principal investigator (who has to be a medical doctor) of a major international study is recruiting 4500 patients in 3 weeks at one site, without a CRO. And working 7 days a week. No gaps. Recruitment every day incl Sat/Sun @IamBrookJackson
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Weekend recruitment for a clinical trial would be odd. Staff are needed to fill out that many record forms (CRFs) and there are potential risks to the trial, so you need medical staff. It would be highly unusual. So who is he? Here is his trial CV
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Wait, hang on. This is Fernando Polack. The Fernando Polack who claims to be at Vanderbilt (USA) at the same time. Who also happens to make appearances for the FDA...
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Who also happens to work for The Infant Foundation http://infant.org.ar and also happens to be funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the NIH He is literally the busiest doctor on the planet
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
But managed to find enough time to be the lead author on the #BNT162b2 paper (with all of Pfizer's scientists)
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Yet while doing all this, he managed to find time to (presumably single-handedly because no other authors are listed at that site) recruit 4500 patients in 3 weeks, with each patient requiring 250 PAGES of case report forms (CRFs). That is 1,125,000 pages of CRFs. In 3 weeks.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
But I'm sure that's totally above board until we get to the next totally above board feature of the fastest 44,000 patient study ever in history.... #site4444 WTF is site 4444? @IamBrookJackson
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
There were 270 clinical recruitment sites for the Pflzer vaccine study, numbered consecutively from 1001 to 1270. There are all listed here. https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/5.2-listing-of-clinical-sites-and-cvs-pages-1-41.pdf This is the last page. There is no site 1271. There is no other site with a number above 1270.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Well that's a bit of a problem because... There are a lot of entries in the randomisation log for #site4444. 1275 patients to be exact. About 3% of the total. And you know what? All 1275 "patients" were recruited in one week - from 22nd to 27th September 2020.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
And what is magical about the week of the 22nd Sept 2020? Well that just happens to be the last week that "recruitment" can take place for the data cut-off for the FDA meeting in December. There is just one problem though (well, two really)...
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
The site doesn't exist. It's totally and utterly fabricated. There is no principal investigator for site 4444 because it doesn't exist. So what happened at "site 4444"?
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
My guess: they needed enough numbers of "positive PCR tests" in the placebo group to show a difference between groups for that VRBPAC meeting on the 10th Dec, and they didn't have them. So site 4444 appeared and gave them their "perfect" result. Bravo.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
[All source documents can be found at https://www.icandecide.org/] @ICANdecide
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Very related: https://davidhealy.org/fishy-business-in-the-rio-de-la-plata/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega Thread: The WHO, FDA, CDC & Gardasil While poking around The WHO website I came across a document entitled: “Vaccine Crisis Communication Manual: A Step by Step Guidance for National Immunization Programs” https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/352029/WHO-EURO-2022-3471-43230-60590-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It’s essentially a communications plan for when the shit hits the fan at varying levels and how all “stakeholders” will sing the same tune in unison. It’s a very instructive read in light of recent events you might have heard of. Here is how they describe the guide:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“This document outlines a suggested structure and proposed contents of a Terms of Reference (TOR) for a national vaccine communication working group. Example texts for each of these elements are also provided for inspiration.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Establishing a national vaccine communication working group allows you to build strong working and collaboration relations with your allies, strengthen routine communication for immunization and ensure well-coordinated and immediate response from all involved authorities…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
to any safety event. Use the document as a starting point for discussions and for inspiration when developing a TOR for your working group.” Here are some screenshots of the phases of response.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
These are the influencers they can harness to help with their propaganda campaign.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Sounds about right.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Also importantly they make sure to “Monitor what the media reports about the crisis. Good relations with key journalists and the media will help you in times of crisis.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They then go on to give example scenarios and how they should communicate to the public if something similar should occur.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
EXAMPLE “An infant has died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) within 24 hours after having been immunized at a local health centre. Preliminary evidence indicates no causal link between the death and the vaccine.” Of course it does.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is an example of their communication objectives and actions with an event like SIDS. As you can see, “restoring public trust” is of utmost importance. To me this sounds like a euphemism for “restoring stakeholder profits” to me.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This next scenario I’m going to focus on what they classified as an “High Impact Crisis Event”. This scenario revolves around a “girl with a serious underlying condition has died after the HPV vaccine”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here are some quotes from the “Crisis Response > Design Communication Response” document that caught my attention. Specifically the claims being made about the HPV vaccine that should be used as talking points to communicate to the public.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They use this as a cookie cutter template where any vaccine can be inserted and used as a talking point. Not biased or sociopathic at all. Again a young girl just died a day after the HPV vaccine. “Our deepest sympathy goes to those affected.” So very compassionate.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Vaccination saves lives and prevents suffering. The risk of severe side effects is extremely small. Some mild and more frequent side effects that may occur include a light rash and fever.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The benefits of vaccination by far outweigh the minimal risk of a severe adverse event following immunization.” “For example: 1 in 1 000 000 individuals vaccinated may suffer from a serious allergic reaction (anaphylaxis).” Those are quite the odds.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The vaccine is prequalified, which means it has been approved by WHO. Before prequalification it was rigorously tested through clinical and field procedures. After prequalification, WHO regularly inspects the production facilities to ensure compliance with good manufacturing”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Scientific evidence shows that combined vaccines save time and money through fewer clinic visits,reduce discomfort for the child through fewer injections and increase the probability that the child will receive the complete set of vaccinations according to the national schedule”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They forgot to mention that it also throttles the immune system, making it much more likely a SAE occurs but who cares right?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Despite high immunization coverage for [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease], (in this case cervical cancer) some children are still missing out on vaccination and thus remain at risk.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Our country has taken all necessary steps to avoid a future outbreak of [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease] by initiating a [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease] (HPV) vaccination catch-up campaign.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Multiple studies, including Phase III randomized trials, have proven the safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine to prevent high-risk HPV infections and subsequent carcinogenesis.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“These studies have not shown any relation between the development of this underlying condition and the HPV vaccine.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I found this quite peculiar as I am familiar with the controversy surrounding HPV vaccine since its release. In fact there is currently a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer Merck for side effects and misleading claims.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So the fact that the WHO boldly proclaims that the trials used for its approval have proven it “safe and effective” is included in their communications plan prompted me to investigate those claims further.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Gardasil Goes to Washington So what of these clinical trials? For a product like Gardasil to be rolled out in multiple countries all of the world and given to one of the youngest most vulnerable populations, adolescent and teenage girls, it had to be safe right?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is what the CDC has to say about it. “HPV vaccination is recommended at ages 11–12 years. HPV vaccines can be given starting at age 9 years. All preteens need HPV vaccination, so they are protected from HPV infections that can cause cancer later in life.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•Teens and young adults through age 26 years who didn’t start or finish the HPV vaccine series also need HPV vaccination. CDC recommends that 11- to 12-year-olds receive two doses of HPV vaccine 6 to 12 months apart.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•The first dose is routinely recommended at ages 11–12 years old. The vaccination can be started at age 9 years. •Only two doses are needed if the first dose was given before 15th birthday.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Teens and young adults who start the series later, at ages 15 through 26 years, need three doses of HPV vaccine. •Children aged 9 through 14 years who have received two doses of HPV vaccine less than 5 months apart will need a third dose.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•Three doses are also recommended for people aged 9 through 26 years who have weakened immune systems. “Vaccination is not recommended for everyone older than age 26 years.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers.” This sounds like a miracle vaccine according to the CDC. Safe and Effective. Definitely Safe and Effective. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/hpv/public/index.html
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
However, Gardasil’s insert states, “GARDASIL has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity”. That means it’s safe and effective right?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So surely the FDA followed all safety procedures and checks and balances. Well not exactly. The FDA approved the quadrivalent Gardasil 4 in 2006 after being fast-tracked for approval (the process only took six months). Gardasil 9 was approved in 2014.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
To give you an idea of the so-called dangers of HPV it takes 15 to 30 years for infection with HPV to lead to cancer. With such a low death rate and the decades it takes for cancer to develop,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
it would take an impossibly large population of patients to reach any statistically significant result in a study to show whether Gardasil prevents cancer so let’s just get that straight. So why did FDA fast track it and sings it’s praises so vociferously in their press release?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
June 18, 2009 Press Announcement "Today is an important day for public health and for women's health, and for our continued fight against serious life-threatening diseases like cervical cancer," said Alex Azar, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
"HHS is committed to advancing critical health measures such as the development of new and promising vaccines to protect and advance the health of all Americans." https://web.archive.org/web/20091019080918/https:/www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2006/ucm108666.htm
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So critical that they were willing forgo basic scientific study protocols in order to get it on the market. Now where have I heard that before?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“According to Mary Holland, Kim Mack Rosenberg, and Eileen Iorio, co-authors of the book, The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For a Generation Betrayed, “none of the participants in the [Gardasil] clinical trials received a true saline placebo,”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Which means the clinical trials failed to measure the effects of Gardasil against a true control.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Instead of receiving a placebo, clinical trial subjects were given aluminum-containing adjuvants and other chemical mixtures which masked adverse events and made Gardasil seem safer than it would have otherwise.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So every expert tasked reviewing the study design, protocols, safety etc.. completely missed this glaring breach of sound protocols and decided to approve it. These are distinguished scientists, they would never allow something like this to happen.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Yes, they would and did as unbelievable as it may seem. This instance wasn’t the first time either.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) evaluates the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for the agency and 23 years ago they were under fire for conflicts of interest around the approval for the rotavirus vaccine.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A 2000 investigation of VRBPAC by the U.S. House of Representatives Reform Committee found, “The overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry” https://www.nvic.org/law-policy-federal/dhhs-vaccine-coi
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is an excerpt from the 2000 investigation on VRBPAC and ACIP committee’s approval of the Rotavirus vaccine that had to be taken off the market entitled: “Majority Staff Report Committee on Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives August 21, 2000”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“A thorough review of the VRBPAC’s and ACIP’s consideration of the Rotavirus vaccine found a flawed process that led to a poor decision.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Committee members with financial ties to the manufacturer of the vaccine, and producers of competing vaccines, were given waivers to participate in the decision-making process.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•Legitimate concerns about serious side effects and a lack of information were swept aside. •The CDC’s advisory committee (ACIP) recommended the “RotaShield” for universal use before it was even approved by the FDA.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•The end result was that a product was placed on the market that had to be withdrawn within one year because it was injuring the children it was meant to protect.” The exact same thing that is happening today with mRNA injections.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Once a vaccine gets through FDA VRBPAC Committee and is licensed it then goes to the CDCs ACIP committee who then recommends it be added to the schedule.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A 2009 report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Inspector General stated that the “CDC had a systematic lack of oversight of the ethics program” and that 97% of CDC committee members’ conflict disclosures had omissions.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is the report: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00260.pdf
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“DHHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] has a clear conflict of interest with respect to Gardasil at the institutional level since it shares directly in Gardasil’s profits.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“We’ve also seen now that this conflict of interest is echoed by (and possibly sustains) a pervasive pattern of regulatory bias in favor of Gardasil during multiple stages of the decision process.” -Mark Blaxill, “A License to Kill? Part 3: Who Guards Gardasil’s Guardians?”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
About Those HPV Trials The WHO referenced in their Crisis Document. On July 27, 2018, the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine published a critique of an earlier review of the HPV vaccine clinical trials. https://ebm.bmj.com/content/ebmed/early/2018/07/27/bmjebm-2018-111012.full.pdf
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They made several observations indicating bias in how the trials were conducted. They reported:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•Regarding the reporting of clinical trial results, one third of the clinical studies were not published. In a separate 2018 study, the same authors found that nearly a third (31%) of the Gardasil and Gardasil 9 studies were not published.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This raises the question of publishing bias, the common practice of publishing only positive results and leaving negative outcomes unmentioned. •None of the 26 HPV vaccine clinical trials included in the review used a true inactive placebo.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
-The so-called placebos contained aluminum-containing adjuvants and other ingredients, biasing or negating any effort to determine the actual increased risk of adverse events caused by the vaccine, compared to a true inactive placebo.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
•Many women with a history of immunological or nervous system disorders were excluded from the trials. The authors mention a 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) study that found serious harms related to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Also complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following HPV vaccination. They note that, as of May 2018, a WHO database contained 526 cases of POTS and 168 cases of CRPS related to HPV vaccination
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The WHO, FDA & CDC Knew and people died. https://nypost.com/2008/07/20/my-girl-died-as-guinea-pig-for-gardasil/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Jessica Ericzon, 17, was "an all-American teenager," as described by one of her upstate LaFargeville teachers. Last February, she was working on her softball pitches, getting ready for a class trip to Universal Studios in Florida and hitting the slopes to snowboard”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Then one day, the blond, blue-eyed honors student collapsed dead in her bathroom. It started with a pain in the back of her head. On the advice of her family doctor, Jessie had taken a series of three Gardasil shots.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Livingstone reported Jessie’s death to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Run by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it has collected 8,000 reports of problems after Gardasil shots, including paralysis, seizures and miscarriages.“Seventeen other deaths following the vaccine have been reported since Merck introduced it in 2006”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Officials have confirmed 11 of the reported deaths so far, said CDC spokesman Curtis Allen.” They have found “no pattern or connection” to Gardasil in eight deaths and are still reviewing three, he said.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Does this story sound familiar to anything going on today? This is standard operating procedure for these organizations and yet we still have 80% of the population who trust these faceless “experts” with their own lives and the lives of their families.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Global Fallout Prior to Gardasils forced deployment globally, in the countries that used smear screening for cancer, the average annual rate of decline was 2.5% between 1989 and 2000 and 1% between 2000 and 2007, resulting in a total decrease of nearly 30% across 1989-2007.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is what Merck would call a “market share” and pharmaceutical companies aren’t keen on sharing anything.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In the UK Vaccination promoters expected cervical cancer rates to decrease in women aged 20 to 24 . However, in 2016, national statistics showed a sharp and significant increase in the rate of cervical cancer in this age group. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29247658/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Women between 20 and 25 years old who were vaccinated between the ages 14 and 18 which was more than 85% of that demographic at the time, have seen their cancer risk increase by 70% in 2 years (from 2.7 in 2012 to 4.6 per 100,000 in 2014.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Those aged 25 to 30, aged between 18 and 23 at the time of the vaccination campaign have seen their cancer risk increase by 100% between 2007 and 2015 from 11 in 100,000 to 22 in 100,000.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Similar increases in cancer were found in younger cohorts post vaccination campaigns in Sweden, Norway and the United States.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
When looking at the trials, Merck’s own preliminary studies predicted that Gardasil would kill and injure far more Americans than the HPV Virus, prior to the introduction of the vaccine.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The average death rate in young women in the U.S. general population is 4.37 per 10,000 See Brady E. Hamilton et al., “Births: Provisional Data for 2016,” Vital Statistics Rapid Release, Report No. 002, June 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr/report002.pdf
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The Gardasil pooled group had a death rate of 8.5 per 10,000 or almost double the background rate in the U.S.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
When Merck added in death from belated clinical trials, the death rate jumped to 13.3 per 10,000 (21 deaths out of 15,706). Now let go back to one more slide from the World Health Organizations Crisis Response Document.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Two key messages were chosen to guide communication goals: “There is a safe & effective vaccine to prevent cervical cancer” and “Every day on woman gets diagnosed with cervical cancer in country [B].” Truly unbelievable isn’t it?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Given that one man with an internet connection, no clinical background, and only a bachelors degree was able to learn these facts about Gardasil but the entirety of the WHO and its infinite resources couldn’t should deeply disturb us all.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Is this a case of complete dereliction of duty or something worse? Either way, how they can make statements like that in good conscience is a direct reflection of their lack of one.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Knowing what you now know about Gardasil watch this brief commercial Merck put out for it and try not to put your fist through the screen in disgust. https://youtu.be/sLB0MaY7luE
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Just this month a judge ruled that a class action lawsuit will be moving forward and will be advancing towards bellwether trials. The lawsuit states:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Merck obtained FDA approval for Gardasil back in 2006 based on deceptive research and clinical trials which misrepresented the efficacy of the vaccine while concealing its safety risks and side effects.“
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Merck then launched an aggressive and highly misleading marketing campaign to include millions of parents vaccinating their pre-teen daughters with Gardasil.” https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/amp/gardasil-hpv-vaccine-lawsuit.html
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Just like they did with Vioxx https://www.nature.com/articles/450324b
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It’s too bad the damage has been done and any settlement will be a drop in the bucket of the profits both Merck and the NIH reaped off of the death and suffering of young women worldwide. For them it’s seems like it’s just the cost of doing business.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It is estimated that Vioxx killed 40,000 people in the United States alone. To give you a comparison, its estimated that 58,000 American died in the Vietnam war and Merck didn’t even fire one shot. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/vioxx-took-deadly-toll-study/article1113848/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Unless you count their marketing campaign, knowingly targeting Americans with false advertising as a shot. Merck Vioxx 2002 Commercial https://youtu.be/Ngz0sWTYqSw
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you enjoyed this thread please consider giving me a follow. As always thank you for the support and stayed tuned.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you or someone you know has experienced an adverse event and you’re comfortable with sharing the story, please share below, it will add tremendous value to the thread. Comment & Share Your Story ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Er.... @FeeRedfern @carl_jurassic why does the Epstein-linked @nyphospital turn up everywhere we look? https://www.ohdsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/OHDSI-OurJourney-2022.pdf
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
WHOA! And every where we look... under every stone... we find @IQVIA_global The "data collaborator" for every COVID study you will never see the data for. @MartinNeil9
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@IQVIA_global @MartinNeil9 BINGO. Holy crap. This study was published in 2020 and was basically the third in the #Lancetgate series. Completely unverifiable and no possibility of being real data. Where did the data come from? IQVIA. Jennifer Lane (an unknown). Oxford. OHDSI...
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@nyphospital (Jeffrey Epstein) Oxford. Astrazeneca. Columbia Irving. Erasmus (Marion Koopmans) Vanderbilt David Geffen Bayer Chinese Academy (CCP) No such thing as a "conspiracy theory" when the conspiracy is this big. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32864627/ @CharlesRixey @Daoyu15
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
You literally cannot make this stuff up. They didn't know this when they chose "88" as their theme? Well, maybe symbolism will be their downfall.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
I'm going to try and spell this out. @OHDSI are a shell corporation for #BigPharma, recruiting geeks with no clinical experience to push synthetic data sets generated by @IQVIA_global to create papers that convince the world to buy their products. That's it. #COVIDin1tweet
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global And you know what? If @OHDSI or @IQVIA_global don't like what I've just revealed, they can give me access to Jennifer Lane's full dataset and I will show you whether it's real. You know why?.... @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane ...because #hydroxychloroquine is one of the safest drugs on earth and there is ZERO chance that it is associated with a 65% increased risk of cardiac mortality as claimed by @jennifercelane This paper is literally #surgisphere 3. You know how I know?...
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane Because I've been in this business longer than Jenny from the block and she had never written a first author paper of any significance before IQVIA ghost wrote this one for her. Now she's able to analyse a 1m patient study, and lead a consortium? Nope. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lane%2C%20jce&filter=years.2012-2020
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane And this is exactly how we busted #surgisphere. It's the weekend. Grab a cup of tea, coffee or glass of wine and sit down to one of the best analyses of the surgisphere scandal via @chrismartenson. Enjoy your weekend. Jenny might be busy. https://youtu.be/IUD_wvkNhnk
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
And... if you really don't believe me about the New York Presbyterian hospital and Jeffrey Epstein... Here you are. Enjoy your weekend. https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/william-farrington-and-the-pedophile
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
And here is your supervising author.
@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭
Brigham and Women's of #surgisphere fame? Emulation of data from existing databases, like the #surgisphere papers? Erasmus university.. And you were the supervisor for Patrick Ryan's ghost written #EMRgate paper. Are you the kingpin, Dani? https://www.brighamandwomens.org/about-bwh/newsroom/press-releases-detail?id=3592
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
2. First, I'll point back to my old thread of threads, so much of which is still censored on Twitter, sigh.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
5. And now for something completely different: #Scientology during the #pandemic.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
1. It is time to explore #Scientology and its strange presence everywhere during the #Plandemonium. First, let us examine the unoriginality of Scientology among occult and UFO cults and religions. https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-unoriginal-mythology-of-scientology
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
7. The before and after thread of nations that never had epidemics until after vaccines were introduced.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
10. A #Mindwar thread featuring #5GW, #Scientology, #Bitcoiners, and much more. https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1713934887365882262?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
11. Do you buy the Steve Kirsch Traveling Road Show? https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1711685815057711210?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
12. Malone and Kirsch raise their [own] banners to announce what Malone glossed over Maria Gutschi already pointed out in Brussels in May, which Sasha Latypova suggested was likely the case in 2021. #HeroBall https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1715857609545187382?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
13. National Case Studies of the #Plandemonium. https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1505815025814052876?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
It's time to summarize the #NationalPandemicCaseStudies at #RoundingTheEarth The #CampfireWiki is documenting: https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=rounding_the_earth:pandemic_national_case_studies
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
1🧵 From the years 2009-2014 a man named Sudhakar Agnihothram was a post doctoral assistant at UNC Chapel HIll under Ralph Baric. He continued research w/ Baric up til 2016 & he was a prominent name in almost all of the infamous SARS research Baric conducted.
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
2🧵Among the most important papers he co-authored was the, Methods & Compositions for chimeric Coronavirus Spike Proteins [2015] & SARS like WIV-1 CoV Poised for Human Emergence [2016] as well as the SARS like cluster Circulating ...[2015]
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
3🧵Sudhakar is also co-author w/ Baric on the "Crystal Structure of RBD from newly emerged MERS..[2013] and co-owner of the patent for the SARS CoV spike proteins [2015/18]. No big deal, right? I thought so until now. Sudhakar's LinkedIn reveals his career since working w/Baric
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
4🧵Sudhakar since 2016 has worked at the FDA in the office of Vaccine Research and Review as a Principal Regulatory Project Manager, in charge of #EUA and Vaccine approvals, namely, the C19 EUA vaccines. His name is personally listed as the deciding regulator on many of the jabs
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
5🧵Sudhakar was also a contributor to the VRBPAC committee of safety & efficacy, reviewing incidents like myocarditis in young adults, & cGMP of certain batches of vaccines. He approved the jab for adolescents for both Moderna and Pfizer. @P_McCulloughMD
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
6🧵 The alarm bells started blaring when I recalled the 2019 Material Transfer Agreement signed between #Moderna and #RalphBaric concerning the vaccine technology that would later go into the C19 vaccines. Knowing the Spike protein is the basis for their vaccine.
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
7🧵This is a massively ignored conflict of interest. The same man determining the EUA authorizations for C19 vaccines has a patent with the guy suspected of creating C19, for chimeric SARS, spike proteins, & co-authored the SAME research sited as proof that C19 was lab made.⚠️
@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes
8🧾Receipts: https://www.fda.gov/media/150136/download https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=976a058d3ffccce982af45dccd0eb9388f9d0834 https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295-NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements https://www.linkedin.com/in/sudhakar-agnihothram-8195309/ https://www.fda.gov/media/153088/download https://patents.justia.com/inventor/sudhakar-agnihothram https://www.fda.gov/media/159611/download
Core training prior to joining FDA was focused on preclinical evaluation of vaccines, antibody therapeutics and small molecule inhibitors targeting emerging viral pathogens (including select agents) of biodefense and public health concern. Contributed to developing small animal models of virus-induced acute lung injury and identifying viral and host targets of disease using systems biology-based approaches. Two years of business development experience evaluating UNC technologies across diverse area of biomedical sciences. A flexible team player with good interpersonal, collaboration, leadership, supervisory, communication and management skills, and proven ability to accelerate product development from discovery to licensed use.
I am a firm believer in a stringent collaborative regulatory approach coalescing key players from diverse sectors that fosters advanced manufacturing technologies, innovative clinical trial designs and real-world evidence-based approaches to solve major public health problems.
SPECIALITIES:
• FDA Regulation of mRNA vaccines & therapeutics, vectored and recombinant vaccines
• FDA Regulation of vaccines, drugs, biologics, and devices
• Counterterrorism, emergency preparedness and response
• Education, training, and outreach
• Business development & patents | Learn more about Sudhakar Agnihothram's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn linkedin.com
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The Godfather of Vaccines” Dr. Stanley Plotkin admits under oath he got paid from all of the big Pharma companies while consulting for an “Independent Report” on whether or not Vaccines cause autism. For some extremely odd reason he didn’t feel the need to disclose it in the report.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Uninformed Consent A thread exposing the lies that your doctor, government and the media told you. Vaccine uptake is at an all time low. The government and the industry they collude with would have you think that it is because of “anti-science“ ignorance. Just millions of buck tooth, mouth breathers who can barely read and what they do read is nothing but dangerous “misinformation”. It couldn’t possibly be their fault. You know, the fact that virtually every autoimmune disease is skyrocketing and the rate of autism has consistently grown with the amount of vaccines administered to kids. It couldn’t possibly be the fact that they are still trying to push an experimental novel technology on the public, including being so brazen as to include it on the childhood schedule. It couldn’t possibly be the hundreds of thousands of debilitating injuries people have suffered with virtually zero recourse for compensation or the fact that they are either ignored, discounted or ridiculed for believing their injuries stem from the most likely variable introduced into their lives. It couldn’t possibly be the fact that people all over the world have watched loved ones including their own children go to sleep never to wake up again. Or they drop to the ground in the prime of their lives while playing a sport they love. The truth of the matter is that the tide of public consciousness is turning and everyday more and more people are realizing the uncomfortable truth. In no small part because of the people featured in this incredibly informative video. The Highwire [@HighWireTalk] aired this yesterday. It features a talk between Del Bigtree [@delbigtree] and Aaron Siri [@AaronSiriSG] where they show various depositions and testimonies of individuals over the years along with adding valuable context and commentary. This is something you can show to “true believers” in your lives with the hope that it may disrupt their programming. Expect a lot of cognitive dissonance to ensue because in 40 minutes they eviscerate various commonly held beliefs in relation to the childhood injections recommended by the CDC and most doctors. I am going to include some more clips as well as some other threads I’ve made to really drive home the point. The point being is that almost everything you think you know about childhood vaccinations is either completely misrepresented or outright lies. Please share this extremely important information and help create some truly informed consent. Funny thing about having real informed consent, it turns out people who have it, usually decide not to consent.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The Placebo Myth with receipts.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Every disease was in precipitous decline when the vaccine was introduced.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
VAERS, designed to be ignored.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
More testimony exposing “the $cience”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Under oath and clueless. PART 1
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Under oath and clueless Part 2
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Full Testimony
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Admitting the quiet part out loud.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Plotkin conflicts of interest
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Maurice Hilleman and Leonard Hayflick aren’t household names but in the world biological sciences they are legends. Hilleman passed away in 2005 and is credited with developing over 40 vaccines and is widely credited as the most influential vaccinolgists ever. Hayflick who is still alive and currently a Professor of Anatomy at UCSF School of medicine, is known for discovering that normal human cells divide for a limited number of times in vitro, known today as the Hayflick Limit. His cell strain WI-38 replaced the monkey kidney cells as the substrate used for producing human vaccines. These are serious scientists and widely celebrated by all stripes so when they speak, people tend to listen. I say this because what you are about to watch is an edit of three different documentaries that compliment each other nicely because each presents evidence from a different perspective on generally the same topic. The first clip is presented by Leonard Horowitz, a Harvard trained public health expert, author and pharmaceutical industry whistleblower. He located a segment that was left on the cutting room floor of a PBS Documentary entitled “The Health Century” which featured a Maurice Hilleman interview. He also mentions Litton Bionetics, a US bio weapons contractor who was responsible for the 1967 Marburg virus outbreak that killed 7 people. 🤔 Marburg Incident: https://is.gd/u1cmpo In it Hilleman reveals information that he and a colleague while working at Merck, discovered a new virus in the monkeys whose kidneys were being used as a substrate in the production of the polio vaccines. When I first heard it I was slightly incredulous because the implications are frightening, so I sought out corroborating evidence. After a couple weeks of searching I came across an interview of Hayflick where he is discussing the problems with using monkey kidneys as a substrate for vaccine production, in particular for the Polio vaccines. Well obviously my ears perked up and he even went on to name drop Hilleman and refer to his morbid discovery. The Virus you ask? Simian Virus 40 (SV40), that was found to be highly carcinogenic. Those two clips are sandwiched between a 2004 documentary called “The Origin of AIDS”. It’s extremely well done with historical footage and some serious investigative journalism spanning the globe, definitely watch it in full some time. The theory it proposes dovetails nicely with the other two clips. If what they propose is true, the implications boggle the mind. Personally, I don’t know if it’s the truth but it sure gets the wheels turning if you can view the evidence objectively. After you watch, let me know what you think below.👇🏻
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I came across this post and saw quite a lot of links included that are supposed to be evidence debunking the claims he references. So I thought I’d have a peek at them and see if there are any potential COI’s that may give someone pause about the claims made. Let’s have a quick look and you tell me.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2667(23)00079-8/fulltext This one is quite ironic and one author provides “training” for AstraZeneca so I’m sure there is no existing bias. Moving on….
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00320-6/fulltext#:~:text=Based%20on%20official%20reported%20COVID,%2C%20and%20Dec%208%2C%202021 Hmmm GlaxoSmithKline, WHO, CEPI, Gavi, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Moderna affiliations. Definitely not worried about the results interpreted at all in this one.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33XF3CN An “article” from AFP Fact Check AFP only receives its funding from the major tech companies and basically every MSM outlet.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10254949/ This one is affiliated with Johns Hopkins, CEPI, the international vaccine access center and written by the man, the myth, the legend Peter Hotez. Nothing to see here totally on the up and up.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanam/article/PIIS2667-193X(23)00039-X/fulltext Pretty much every author is affiliated with the company who manufactures the COVID vaccine in Brazil who works with AstraZeneca. I’m sure the money they receive from them has zero impact on their interpretation of the results and they would for sure would have reported these findings regardless.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/analysis-claiming-covid-19-vaccines-killed-17-million-people-flawed/ Health feedback, yet another extremely reputable source that gets its funding from the Poynter Institute, META, Tik Tok and is a member of the WHO Vaccine Safety Net. Definitely no COI’s there, it’s not like all of those institutions have censored and propagandized the world about how awesome the injections are.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
And finally an article from MedScape claiming 3 Million lives have been saved by our lords and saviors the COVID injections. Quite the claim so I took a look at the “studies” it referenced to come to that tremendous conclusion. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/985529
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 1 Dr. Gondi gets paid by the NYC Department of Health and Public Hygiene, I’m sure they have no interest in making their disastrous response look good. Dr. Chomsky was the 43rd Health Commissioner of NYC and actually oversaw the COVID vaccine campaign, definitely no reason for concern there. Dr. Galvani receives “personal fees” from Jannsen who had their own COVID vaccine. No problem right?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 2 This was simply republished from the MMWR Mortal Weekly but don’t fret 4 of the investigators received support from Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqiris and Pfizer but definitely not related to the covid vaccines. Finally, the study is looking at nursing home residents so naturally you want to have guy who was a former chair of the “independent” Quality Committee at HCR Manorcare now Promedica Senior Cate and is one of the largest nursing home companies in the country.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So to recap, I looked at the studies provided that are supposed to be evidence that the COVID vaccines saved millions of lives and I’m happy to report that almost every single study only has multiple conflicts of interests directly tied to the institutions and organizations who have a huge stake in having the public believe it.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They think you are fucking dumb.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Hey all, check my feed for another COI analysis forthcoming. This is the study: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-1754?utm_source=cmpnr&utm_campaign=lfa_240109_1&utm_content=1&cmp=1&utm_medium=email
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Thread 🧵 Since everyone seemed to have really enjoyed the last COI post, let’s have a look another study being promoted by individuals deeply entrenched in the Bio-Pharmaceutical industry and who have never met a countermeasure or injection they didn’t like.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study: "Real Work Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Against Infection in Children and Adolescents" The first thing I noticed was that it has 27 authors on this one paper that’s A LOT of authors and it makes quite the claim. Namely that BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioNTech “was effective for various COVID-19–related outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods”. Ok fair enough but with that many people getting a byline I thought it may be prudent to have a look at the supplementary disclosure material provided for the study, which can be found here if you’d like to have a look yourself: https://rmed.acponline.org/authors//conflictFormServlet/M23-1754/ICMJE/M23-1754-Disclosures.pdf And here is a link to the study itself: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-1754?utm_source=cmpnr&utm_campaign=lfa_240109_1&utm_content=1&cmp=1&utm_medium=email
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The moral of this story is to always check the supplementary/funding material so that you can put what the authors claim in perspective based upon their financial ties to industry and institutions. People like Eric and Tim would much rather you just blindly believe what they post and not look into COI’s because they know that may inject some doubt in the providence of their claims which just so happen to, without exception, favor the use of costly bio-pharmaceutical interventions.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Out of the 27 authors 11 reported something on their International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) Form. Let’s have a look at what they disclosed shall we? 1. Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen has two ironically titled grant’s listed which you can see here. I used the NIH Reporter to look them up as you can see here and the total amount between both comes to: $3,367,481
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
2. Yong Chen This gentleman had quite a lot to look through as far as grants and consulting fees. I have provided a screen of the grants one of which is worth $541,499,593! As you can see. It seems like Yong is kind of a big deal in the biostatistics world. He is a Professor at U of Penn and reports consulting fees from Pieces Tech and Harvard Pilgrim an insurance provider. Have a look at his extensive bio: https://penncil.med.upenn.edu/about-pi/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
3. Jiang Bian Jiang reports 2 grants from the NIH both related to COVID research totaling: $3,199,190
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
4. Christopher Forrest Chris reports that a portion of the infrastructure for this study was provided by the “Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute” which I have never heard of, what could it be?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute is a “non-profit” that has awarded $4.5 Billion for research projects and was authorized to be established through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 where a Trust Fund was established. From the website: “Under the 2019 amendment to the authorizing law, the PCOR Trust Fund receives income from two funding streams: statutory appropriations from the general fund of the Treasury and a fee assessed on private insurance and self-insured health plans (the PCOR Trust Fund Fee). Prior to the 2019 amendment, the PCOR Trust Fund also received income from transfers from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid trust funds. PCORI receives 80 percent of the monies collected by the PCOR Trust Fund to support its research and programmatic funding and operations. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) receives the other 20 percent of Trust Fund monies to support dissemination and research capacity-building efforts”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In other words YOU fund it if you are American and given the fact that it’s taxpayer funded and works directly with HHS I’m sure there is nothing to worry about as far as bias goes. https://www.pcori.org/research/about-our-research
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
5. Suchitra Rao Suchitra reported grants or contracts with BioFire, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sequiris.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Sequiris is one of the world’s largest influenza vaccine companies according to their website. Nothing to see here right? https://www.cslseqirus.us
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Now who is Biofire? It is a division of Biomerieux, the company that actually built the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Stephan Bancel the current Moderna CEO and freshly minted billionaire because of it was actually the CEO of Biomerieux during the construction of WIV believe it or not. Biofire (quite the name) creates Tests for COVID-19 and other “pathogens” because of course they do. https://www.biofiredx.com As for GSK aka GlaxoSmithKline well you know what they do. I’m confident these connections to the pharmaceutical industry, specifically testing for COVID and making Flu vaccines doesn’t cloud Suchitra’s judgement at all in regard to their work determining that COVID injections are fantastic for children.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
6. L. Charles Bailey Charles listed the RECOVER Program, yet another I was not familiar with.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
RECOVER is a $1.15 Billion research program started in the wake of COVID. I’m sure if the conclusion for the study I’m referencing was that COVID Vaccines are worthless for children and dangerous he would report it considering all of his funding for research comes from the government that continuously says they are “safe and effective”. Oh and he also receives support from the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, the $4.5 Billion program referred to earlier. 🤷🏼♂️ https://recovercovid.org/about
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
7. Megan L Fitzgerald Megan lists the Balvi Foundation to the Patient Led Research Collaborative. I’m sure like me, this is yet another entity you are not familiar with.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The PLRC is funded by the BAVI Foundation which is a fund created by the founder of Ethereum Vitalik Buterin. However don’t worry because on their website that say “we regularly meet with the CDC, WHO, NIH and other official medical associations and governments”. Phew, thank god because I was starting to think there may be bias in their work. https://patientresearchcovid19.com
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The BAVI Foundation cites a study on their website which in turn cites that its main author Athena Akrami is funded by none other than the Wellcome Trust the worlds third largest philanthropic foundation besides the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (2) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (1). So that’s a relief, we can all rest easy knowing that Jeremy Farrar was the former Director of Wellcome Trust. She even has her own lab with the trust. https://www.sainsburywellcome.org/web/groups/akrami-lab
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is the study Balvi Cites, it is a major promotor of Long COVID. I urge you to have a look at the “symptoms” they have listed here: https://www.thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019/attachment/921f00f5-bbfb-4cc3-82fe-9e06a5a93ea7/mmc1.docx It’s basically anything and everything that can be considered a symptom to human beings so that narrows it down. It also ensure future funding to study literally every symptom known to mankind, to be attributed to “Long COVID”. Quite convenient isn’t it?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
8. Kathryn Hirabayashi She is also affiliated with the $1.15 Billion RECOVER program.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
9. Alka Khaitan is also tied the RECOVER Program
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
10. Hanieh Razzaghi is also tied the RECOVER Program
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
That brings me to lucky number 11 and the last of our authors. Dr. Ravi Jhaver Dr. Ravi Jhaveri reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Seqirus(from earlier the flu vaccine maker), personal fees from Elsevier (a global leader in analytics and information), personal fees from Dynavax (a bio pharmaceutical company), personal fees from Sanofi (another pharmaceutical company) and personal fees from Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (deep ties to the pharmaceutical industry) but don’t worry he checked the box ensuring us this money is unrelated to his work on the paper about covid injections for children.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Well will you look at that, Dynavax has an expanded relationship with Bill Gates run CEPI to increase the supply of COVID-19 Vaccines. So his work determining the effectiveness of the covid injections in children definitely plays zero role with all of these COI’s he listed. Especially given his ties to Sanofi who has a booster of their own.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So as you can see, you sometimes have to peel multiple layers back to find the real funding and interests involved in these studies. 11 out of the 27 authors of the study have extensive ties to major government grants, many they share in, pharmaceutical companies, medical technology companies and “non-profit” organizations such as Wellcome Trust. After becoming aware of these disclosures (which I’ll give them credit for disclosing at least) how confident are you in the conclusion made in the study they are listed on? That Pfizer-BioNTech “was effective for various COVID-19–related outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods”. Even though kids don’t get gravely ill from covid unless they have serious co-morbidities, develop natural immunity that the injections destroy if taken after already having covid and that there are thousands of reports that show they are seriously injuring and even causing the death of young people worldwide. Yet, they continually push them on the public.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Do you know why? Because they think you are a fucking idiot.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega Thread 🧵 COI Analysis: "Communication of COVID-19 Misinformation On Social Media by Physicians in the US" You may remember this “study” that made the rounds back in August 2023. Well it’s making the rounds again with people like Dr. Stea and being used as proof that “Misinformation Kills”. This is such a sociopathic thing to say because he knows damn well there is ZERO way to prove that claim not to mention that the statement is itself in Misinformation. Yet he parrots it and provides a “study” while claiming that 1,100,000 lives could have been saved if only us plebs would have followed the “public health recommendations”. This unbelievably sycophantic statement was the last straw, I needed to look at this “study”. What I found left me dumbfounded, trust me this one is long but stick with it. The Study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2808358
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I’ll also note that the 1,100,00 lives saved claim isn’t even referenced in the study as far as I can tell, so he just inserted that to bolster his non-argument, it’s probably claimed in some other ludicrous paper. I’ve noticed this “study” has been used as a pretext to “prove” that misinformation actually causes “harm”. You see, they can’t do anything about their precious “misinformation” unless they can prove that is causing real world harm. That is what this entire “study” is about and the authors as well as anyone who shares it unironically should be laughed at for doing so. https://www.medpagetoday.com/podcasts/anamnesis/106007
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
For the study they essentially cyber stalked 52 doctors who they claim are spreaders of “misinformation”. These screenshots are from the MedPage puff piece, the authors of it barely conceal their true intentions which is to ultimately get the 52 doctors license suspended for not falling in line with what authorities say is true. It’s absolutely detestable.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
God forbid they use their rights as a citizen based on their expertise as medical doctors to “discourage people from getting the COVID-19 vaccine” or talk about “unapproved” (an Orwellian slip) medications and treatments. These same people would be the first to defend giving a 10 year old Lupron off-label in order to freeze their puberty and destroy their endocrine systems because of transgender ideology but god forbid these doctors recommend one of the safest drugs administered to humans in history to undermine their precious mRNA platform. They even go as far as to say they were “spewing conspiracy theories”, they can’t even hide their contempt for the truth. Finally they trot out an “expert” named Nick Sawyer from UC Davis Health to state that the findings were “pretty damning, especially to medical specialty societies, board certifying bodies, and state medical boards, and federal agencies with jurisdiction over these doctors”. Their intentions couldn’t be more transparent, this was a coordinated operation to publish a study in a reputable journal, so that it could be pointed to by medical propagandists in order to give medical boards and federal authorities the pretext to go after the doctors who refuse to tow the line.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Who wrote this screed? Well according to the byline there are 6 authors but the common denominator is Sarah Goff MD, PhD she runs the lab this paper came out of. All of the other Authors are undergrads, if you click there names it will take you to a page that shows this is the first paper they have ever been on.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Sarah is Yale educated for her BS in Neurobiology and went to UMass for her Doctor of Philosophy and Public Health. Interesting combo.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
She was recently awarded a $3 Million grant from NIH to study the impact of Medicaid ACO’s on Mental Health for children. Ok now on to the paper itself.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Let’s look at the Design which are based upon the CDC guidelines, so they have already dispensed with logic and have entered the political realm. The Setting is social media and MSM outlets and the Participants are the physicians they have decided to target using the data gleaned from those sources. Misinformation is taken as anything that steps outside the bounds of the official guidelines that left the US with the highest death rate for wealthy in the world during covid I might add. Here is the source for that statement: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/01/science/covid-deaths-united-states.html
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The results simply lay bare what they are worried about people thinking. Vaccine aren’t safe or effective, using non-approved medications because you must take the vaccine, the FDA said so. Thinking that masks, which are bacteria filled Petri dishes sitting an inch from your nose and mouth, aren’t healthy for you. Most of all though, don’t promote conspiracy theories about the origin of the virus or even dare to think that the government lies because that would make you a conspiracy theorist you horrible person. How dare you think.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Conclusion: Needless to say, if you have already determined that the people you are going to target specifically for spreading “misinformation” that doesn’t align with government policy, your conclusion has been preordained. These filthy misinformation spreaders are causing real world harm and we need to invest a lot more into studying this. We also need to examine these potential word murderers intentions because there may be some legal or professional retribution we can dole out in order to make an example out of them.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Another curious aspect to this study is that it states it is funded “via internal support by UofMass and Dr. Goff”. However if the study was self-funded by Dr. Goff and U Mass, why would they feel the need to place a disclaimer about the US Department of Veterans Affairs & US Government???
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This made me curious so I did a quick search on Sarah academic paper history. What I found was that she has wrote a couple papers that are housed on RAND Corps website? 🤔 Oddly enough she was writing about the importance of Fluoride Varnish for children 1-5 years old. Both published
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Both of the studies were published just months apart and are all about “Health Equity”, they need to know why mostly white kids are the only ones getting the Fluoride Varnish. I googled “fluoride varnish costs between 1 - 5 years old Massachusetts” and those studies were in the first 5 search results. Further down I found a presentation by the “Office of Oral Health Massachusetts Department of Public Health entitled “Public Health Dental Hygienist Toolkit” As luck would have it I had just stumbled upon exactly what the RAND studies were referring to, the need to increase Fluoride Varnish treatments on 1-5 year olds, especially because of “health equity” naturally with an emphasis on “underprivileged”communities. So what do they recommend? PHDH Presentation: https://www.mass.gov/doc/evidence-based-oral-disease-prevention-strategies/download
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Well firstly they immediately reference this as their “evidence” before continuing to the “data”.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
You know I’m finding that document, so a quick search later and presto I found the document the Massachusetts Department of Health uses to make recommendations in regards to what people should put on their kids teeth between the ages of 1-5. Notice how I highlighted the “American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs”? Sounds official right? They are a council of “experts” appointed by the American Dental Association. An organization who sits at the heart of American Dentistry their About Page on the website states: “Together with our 159,000+ members, the ADA has been driving dentistry forward for more than 160 years.” So basically they have controlled the Dentistry Industry since 1859, James Buchanan was the president the last time they weren’t involved. https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(14)64961-8/fulltext
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
According the the Fluoride Action Network: “The ADA and the ADA Foundation received over $28 million from pharmaceutical companies, dental equipment manufacturers and insurance companies, from 2006 – 2009, according to a January 20, 2010, letter from the ADA’s Chief Financial Officer to U.S. Senator Charles Grassley.” This can’t possibly have any bearing on the recommendation can it? The major pharmaceutical companies that sell Fluoride are: Colgate, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble and Pfizer” All the heavy hitters have a stake in the dentistry’s industry. The CDC named Fluoridation on of the “10 great public health achievements of the 20th century” so I think it’s safe to say that the relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and government is a cozy one. They are both interested in making sure fluoridation continues to be used on the public at large. https://fluoridealert.org/content/bulletin_12-24-13/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Nevermind the fact that Fluoride has been found per a government sponsored report to be unsafe for children at the levels currently being used. That is why there is a major lawsuit happening right now to the CDC has been fighting tooth and nails. https://fluoridealert.org/articles/national-toxicology-program-finds-no-safe-level-of-fluoride-in-drinking-water-water-fluoridation-policy-threatened/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Also here is a post I made a while back explains the findings in the report. https://x.com/joshwalkos/status/1638720783030648833?s=46&t=vA2OW8Ya3YtNHv_brmZjmg
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Fluoride is totally safe in the water they said. We need it it to help our teeth they said. What they didn’t say was that it is a neurotoxin that lowers people’s IQ and isn’t safe at any levels. “Overall, the report provides strong evidence that fluoride is associated with a substantial loss of IQ at levels of exposure common in people drinking fluoridated water.” https://fluoridealert.org/articles/national-toxicology-program-finds-no-safe-level-of-fluoride-in-drinking-water-water-fluoridation-policy-threatened/ #EPA
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Now remember that paper from the council that was created by the ADA and that the Massachusetts government are using for recommendations? It was essentially ghostwritten by industry interests, that’s how this works. Here are the slides explaining the options for Fluoride:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The State of Massachusetts recommends the following for children 6 years old and Younger. Based on a risk assessment various forms of fluoride are the norm whether it be in the water, a must, toothpaste, or varnish. Either way they want fluoride in your child’s body.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I am sure it has nothing to do at all with the projected growth of the industry. Which is expected to reach $817,803 million by 2027.https://www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/global-sodium-fluoride-market
Sodium Fluoride Market industry report focuses on the current market trends, size, share, and COVID-19 impact. CAGR of 5.51%, Market Size: US$817.803 million in 2027.
knowledge-sourcing.com@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Ok back to Sarah Goff and her studies that were released a few months apart in 2023 by RAND Corp. The Study 1 Conclusion although the rates are increasing, not enough equity has been spread around, those black and brown children’s rates are worryingly low, what would they do without our Fluoride? https://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/S1876-2859(23)00152-3/fulltext
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 2 was done in order to identify barriers to optimal fluoride application so it’s no surprise that they feel much work needs to be done to bring up those numbers because fluoride is apparently want 1-6 years old teeth crave. https://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/S1876-2859(23)00371-6/fulltext
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
To summarize the original study I set out to examine for COI’s, was about targeting doctors who spread “misinformation” about COVID, this led me to the Fluoride industry which peculiarly enough, the author of the misinformation paper has ties to. She helped write 2 papers, promoted by RAND Corp. about the use of fluoride varnish. From Fluoride to a Misinformation paper targeting COVID doctors that was funded by UMass and Goff herself but placed a disclaimer on it about the views expressed are not representative of the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs & US Government. 🤔 That got me thinking after the fact, so out of curiosity I searched the word “Government” within the study, thinking I may had missed something that said the government was somehow involved. To my surprise I was correct, this was an odd disclaimer because nothing else indicates government involvement. However, could it be because the word “government”is used 14 times in the paper? 🤷🏼♂️ I’m pretty sure by wanting to make clear the government definitely had no involvement, they revealed that the government definitely had involvement. 😂
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Something just didn’t add up so I wanted to see what else I could find on Sarah Goff, the Yale educated Neurobiologist with a Doctor of Philosophy and Public Health from UMass, who publishes for RAND Corp. Whilst promoting “Health Equity” via Fluoride and sponsored a paper targeting Doctors for not promoting the COVID-19 Vaccine. In a jaw dropping twist, while searching about Sarah Goff in Massachusetts I came upon a substack post by non other than Meryl Nass, someone who is undoubtedly one of the 52 Doctors targeted. The post on her substack is about a covid vaccine mandate for a High School in Amherst, Massachusetts that was holding a COVID Vaccine clinic. It has a video of a school board meeting and a photo of this death certificate. https://merylnass.substack.com/p/amherst-schools-collect-2000-to-host This Death Certificate dated September 17, 2022. Look at the underlined name and the underlined highlighted section. No way, it couldn’t be?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This was a local news story about why happened but did not mention family.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Before I jumped to conclusions I wanted to see what Amherst policy was for COVID Injections. Although the teachers mandate was lifted April 26th, 2023, the students mandate remained in effect. Considering this happy at an Amherst Cross Country event I think it is reasonable to infer what you are thinking.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
But then my suspicions were unfortunately confirmed. https://www.gazettenet.com/Amherst-Regional-High-School-junior-dies-at-cross-country-meet-in-Ludlow-48093798
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
https://everloved.com/life-of/anna-burns/obituary/
The Amazing Anna Burns was a joyful light in our lives for sixteen years, bringing kindness, curiosity, and spirit to all that they do. Anna's wide interest…
everloved.com
@jathorpmfm - James Thorp MD
There are only TWO irrefutable data sources that are clear as to the alleged safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. The first is Pfizer 5.3.6 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf that colluded w HHS CDC FDA to hide it for 75 years. Their data are clear - the Covid vax was the deadliest and most injurious drug ever rolled out in the history of medicine with 42,086 casualties including 1,223 DEAD in just 10 weeks (page 7 pictured below) and catastrophic pregnancy outcomes (page 12 pictured below). The second is published in a peer reviewed medical journal from a governmental database totally open sourced, using FDA methodology documenting breaches of FDA defined safety signals (PRR 2 or greater) in 18 adverse events in pregnancy (including malformations). This has been published for over a year, anyone in the world has been able to has duplicate this study- - NOBODY has refuted or challenged it. Thorp JA, Rogers C; Deskevich, MP, Tankersley S, Benavides A, Redshaw, M.D.; McCullough, P.A. COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function. Journal of the American Physicians & Surgeons Spring 2023; 28(1) https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf Every other study documenting safety of the vaccine in pregnancy is published in terminally corrupted medical journals, NOT open source, extreme conflicts of interest with authors & journals refusing transparency. The fraudulent Shimabukuro NEJM with the CORRUPT Editor in Chief Eric Rubin is the classic case in point and irrefutable proof. The LANCET May 2020 Mehra article falsely impugning safety & efficacy of hydroxychloroquine is another classic case in point and irrefutable proof of terminal pharmaceutical kleptocratic entanglement of all the major journal - even the “most prestigious & influential medical journals in the world- NEJM & LANCET. To see details of these fraudulent publications see page 170-171 of the following peer reviewed article to read verifiable truths of these scandals: https://www.thegms.co/medical-ethics/medethics-rw-22071901.pdf Do your own due diligence. The terminal corporate kleptocratic entanglement of pharmaceutical industry with NEJM & other journals and the CDC FDA was proven at the turn of the century by long term NEJM Editor Dr Marcia Angell. The publications supporting the safety & efficacy of the COVID vaccines have massive conflicts of interest. Take the publications from UCSF for example - their own website boasts the most NIH funding than any other institution in the USA and this is reviewed in the following article: americaoutloud.news/a-call-for-imm… RES IPSA LOQUITOR CUI BONO
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
Here we have community notes lying & running damage control for big pharma. You see this shit @elonmusk @CommunityNotes This is unacceptable. No evidence? Who decides what’s fake news?🧵
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
“However, emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth.”
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
Study: IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222767/
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
Another reason I feel like the authors of these notes need to be made public because most of the sources they are using are heavily biased and funded by big pharmaceutical companies who are heavily invested in damage control. https://t.co/tWB78rr9Zl
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
Furthermore, it’s the complete opposite. It’s just like when I read a scientific paper or look for an article I want to know who’s funding these studies and what interest these individuals may have on these topics. To avoid biased reporting we need accountability for these people who are writing notes based on their personal feelings on the subject. Journalists aren’t anonymous, scientists name on studies aren’t anonymous why should these folks be any different?
@Censored4sure - Luther ‘Ćyrus’
All these sites mentioned by the 'readers' behind have large funds that also have Big Pharma stocks. Vanguard, Blackrock etc.etc. I think community notes are great, some added context never hurt anybody. But if they are to be taken seriously by anyone. All this anonymous shit needs to end. If you feel uncomfortable about what you’re reporting on then maybe you should be reporting or writing notes. If it’s genuine the last thing you should be afraid of is confrontation.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega 🧵 The FDA Just Fast Track Approved a New Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte Treatment (TIL) Called Amtagvi for Advanced Melanoma. It's the first approval of its kind for skin cancer, potentially opening the floodgates for a new generation of treatments but at what cost?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The FDA's use of the accelerated approval pathway has shown significant trends and shifts over the years. Initially, the pathway was primarily used to expedite approvals for drugs treating severe conditions like HIV and cancer, remember AZT? That drug ended up being so toxic that it killed untold amounts of people afflicted with HIV that may not have otherwise perished from the disease. Look up what happened to Arthur Ashe if you don’t believe me. https://avalere.com/insights/understanding-the-history-and-use-of-the-accelerated-approval-pathway From 1992 to 2010, a substantial proportion of accelerated approvals were for HIV (39.7%) and cancer (35.6%) treatments. However, from 2010 to 2020, there was a marked shift towards oncology, with 85% of accelerated approvals targeting cancer treatments. A significant increase in the use of expedited approval programs, including accelerated approval, was noted between 2000 and 2018. This trend is evident from the rising annual number of new drug approvals, which spiked notably from an average of 23 new molecular entities (NMEs) per year from 2000 to 2010 to 35 in 2011, reaching up to 59 by 2018. https://www.pharmasalmanac.com/articles/drug-approval-trends-significant-acceleration-in-recent-years
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Moreover, the approval rate for first-in-class drugs, which often use the accelerated pathway, has also increased. For example, in 2021, a notable number of first-in-class drugs received accelerated approval. According to an FDA Report: “14 of 50 drugs (28%) using the pathway. In contrast, 12 of 53 drugs (22.6%) in 2020, 9 of 48 drugs (18.7%) in 2019, and 4 of 59 drugs (6.7%) in 2018 received the Accelerated Approval designation.” Report: https://www.fda.gov/media/155227/download
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
These trends indicate a significant reliance on the accelerated approval pathway to bring drugs to the market more swiftly. These approvals are couched as potentially life saving to patients who have no other options, tugging at a docile public’s heart strings. However, closer scrutiny of the approval process reveals that there is much more to this story than just “saving lives”. Many of these “fast tracked” drugs have shown themselves to be very problematic to those tasked with taking them. Often leaving their health in much worse shape than before and sometimes killings people, as you will soon see.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Made by Iovance Biotherapeutics, the new treatment we will be examining, called Amtagvi, will cost already cash strapped patients no less than $515,000 per treatment. The approval by the FDA was based on the data from a Phase 2 trial while a confirmatory Phase 3 trial is still ongoing. As of right now, it can only be used by people who have melanoma that cannot be removed surgically or has spread and has been treated with other drugs. So we are talking about people with already highly depleted immune systems due to the previous treatment. If you search online, you will find legacy media fawning over the approval touting its 31.5% responder rate, meaning the tumor had a reduction in size in 31.5% of recipients. We will get to this later. The main thrust of this approval and the reason it is being celebrated is that it opens potential floodgates for a new generation of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The Washington Post had this to say: “Though the condition is uncommon, cancer experts say winning FDA approval could mark the beginning of a potent new weapon against far more common tumors.” However, as much as investors and the biopharmaceutical industry love the 47% Iovance stock increase since the announcement, the celebration may be premature because the FDA also issued a black box warning for the treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-lifileucel-unresectable-or-metastatic-melanoma https://jitc.bmj.com/content/10/12/e005755.altmetrics
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you search online, you will find legacy media fawning over the approval touting its 31.5% responder rate, meaning the tumor had a reduction in size in 31.5% of recipients. We will get to this later. The main thrust of this approval and the reason it is being celebrated is that it opens potential floodgates for a new generation of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) therapies. The Washington Post had this to say: “Though the condition is uncommon, cancer experts say winning FDA approval could mark the beginning of a potent new weapon against far more common tumors.” However, as much as investors and the biopharmaceutical industry love the 47% Iovance stock increase since the announcement, the celebration may be premature because the FDA also issued a black box warning for the treatment. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biotech-stock-47-upside-according-111400042.html
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Given this warning and since this is being billed as ushering in a new era in cancer treatments, I decided it would be prudent to have a look at the studies this approval is based on by reviewing the package insert provided by the FDA. Just to see how “safe & effective” this new revolutionary TIL treatment truly is. A 31.5% respondent rate doesn’t seem all that revolutionary to me, especially if you are charging a whopping $515,000 for a single treatment. If I am paying that much, the responder rate needs to be much higher than that, especially considering it has a black box warning which we are going to review. Once we have examined the trial data we will then break down the Conflicts of Interests submitted by the authors, which I think will bring my suspicions into focus about this drug’s approval being used to usher in a cottage industry of these new extremely profitable TIL treatments. https://www.fda.gov/media/176417/download
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The sociological forces surrounding drug approvals are far too often ignored as if human nature stops being human nature because it is drug research. The propensity for bias that aligns with the potential social and financial capital to be gained has to be taken into consideration. Especially in light of the fraud and deception both the pharmaceutical industry and the government have perpetrated in recent decades. Let’s be honest, here we have a highly toxic novel treatment being given to individuals who haven’t responded well to other treatments. It costs these people $515K on top of their other medical bills and has a mortality rate of 7.5%. This is why closer scrutiny of COI statements is needed today. It’s as if just because they tell you they have conflicts of interest that is supposed to magically absolve them for their conflicts of interest. This is the logic of a vampire. Speaking of which let’s examine the level of “fair warning” the vampires deem acceptable.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
THE BLACK BOX WARNING Please note, that this and all subsequent screenshots are taken directly from the package insert of Amtagvi unless otherwise noted. As you can see the warning given is quite serious, all of these conditions are not to be trifled with and I am going to go through each one so that you can gain an understanding of what they entail and the potential implications to the health of anyone who receives this treatment. We will then continue to the Clinical Trial Data and parse what it actually means instead of just relying on what the FDA and Iovance’s press release says like the rest of the world. A "black box warning" is the most serious warning that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can require for prescription drug labeling. It indicates that medical studies have demonstrated that the drug carries a significant risk of serious or even life-threatening adverse effects. The warning is presented in a prominent black box to ensure that both prescribers and patients are aware of the risks. Here are the conditions they are warning the public about. “Severe cytopenia, internal hemorrhage, severe infections, and be sure to monitor for cardiopulmonary and renal functions.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Interestingly, I found an article on http://cancer.gov about the FDA approval, and nowhere in it did it mention the black box warning. Here is how it characterized side effects. “All participants in the trial had side effects caused by the treatment, Dr. Wermke reported. Most, however, were not dangerous and were largely caused by the chemotherapy given before the lifileucel infusion and IL-2 given afterward. The most common included anemia, high fevers, and substantial drops in levels of plateletsand certain white blood cells.” This is a patently false characterization of the side effects laid out in the study themselves as well as the package insert. These willful misrepresentations could be due to the fact that the National Cancer Institute entered into a “cooperative research agreement” with Iovance way back in 2011. “In 2011, NCI entered into a cooperative research agreement with Iovance to further develop this particular TIL therapy, including conducting larger clinical trials and developing a manufacturing infrastructure, paving the way for FDA approval.”“It’s been a long time coming, Dr. Rosenberg acknowledged. The new approval “is a big step,” he said, one which demonstrates that “cellular therapy is joining the mainstream of cancer treatment.” https://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2024/fda-amtagvi-til-therapy-melanoma https://www.techtransfer.nih.gov/policy/cradas
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In fact, the NCI’s stake in TIL goes back further than 2011, according to a news release by the H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE: “Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy has been around for decades. Pre-clinical studies evaluating its efficacy began in the early 1980s at the National Cancer Institute (NCI). James J. Mulé, IPh.D., a world-renowned immunologist and associate center director of Translational Science at Moffitt, brought TIL research to the cancer center in 2003.” Over 40 years in the making. https://www.moffitt.org/treatments/immunotherapy/til-therapy/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Cooperative Research Agreements (CRA) are used widely between the government and private companies. It usually means parties will contribute resources, expertise, and possibly personnel to conduct specific research. For example, a government laboratory might offer scientific expertise and specialized equipment, while the pharmaceutical company could provide additional scientific talent and funding. The agreement outlines specific research goals, which are often aimed at developing new drugs, improving existing treatments, or enhancing manufacturing processes. These goals are clearly defined to ensure that both parties are aligned in their expectations and contributions. CRAs usually specify how IP rights are handled. Typically, the pharmaceutical company may be granted the first option to negotiate licenses for any inventions that result from the collaboration. Both parties usually protect their pre-existing IP while sharing rights to new discoveries made during the partnership. The agreements include confidentiality clauses that prevent the sharing of sensitive information beyond the scope of the partnership. There are often provisions related to the publication of research findings, where the government may retain the right to publish results after a certain period. The agreement might also include stipulations on how data is shared between the parties during and after the project. The NCI’s decidedly muted tone on the black box warning and misrepresentation of overall side effects are no doubt due to the investment it has placed into this research for the past 40 years. This is illustrative of just how intertwined our “public-private partnerships” (P3) have truly become.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is a local news segment touting it as the next big thing in cancer treatment. “We think this is only the start.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The “Revolutionary Treatment” Regime This is how this treatment works in lay terms. They are basically taking a piece of a person's tumor and then isolating the Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TIL), reproducing them in large numbers, and then putting them back into the patient via an infusion. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are defined as lymphocytes that directly oppose and/or surround tumor cells. Here is a depiction that Iovance Biotherapeutics provides to describe the process. https://jitc.bmj.com/content/jitc/10/12/e005755.full.pdf?with-ds=yes
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is a bit more detailed depiction of how TIL therapy is conducted to give you a visual sense of the process. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14712598.2023.2193290
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Now that we understand the basic idea behind this therapy let’s have a look at the details that precipitated the black box warning. Under the section labeled “Treatment-Related Mortality”, it tells us that out of 160 people who received AMTAGVI, 7.5% of them died because of issues related to the treatment. This means out of every 100 people treated with AMTAGVI, about 7 or 8 people died due to complications from the treatment. These complications included serious infections like sepsis (a severe reaction to an infection), pneumonia (lung infection), and encephalitis (brain inflammation); bleeding inside the body, such as in the abdomen or brain; kidney failure; breathing problems; heart rhythm problems; excessive fluid in the abdominal area; liver damage; and failure of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. If you recall the article published by the National Cancer Institute blamed all of the side effects on the chemotherapy required prior to the infusion. This is an extremely convenient conclusion to make, isn’t it? Especially when we consider the financial interest the NCI has with its partner Iovance.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Let me get this straight, the drug killed 7.5% of the patients? 12 out of 160 people died directly because of taking it and the FDA thinks that is promising? Here is a breakdown of these deaths. When Deaths Occurred: - 2 patients died during the initial phase where the treatment weakens the immune system (this is called lymphodepletion). - 6 patients died within the first 30 days after receiving AMTAGVI. - 4 patients died between 38 to 150 days after getting the treatment. Causes of Death: The deaths were due to severe side effects, including: - Serious infections like sepsis (a life-threatening response to infection), pneumonia (lung infection), and encephalitis (brain inflammation). - Bleeding inside the body, including in the abdomen and brain. - Kidney failure, where the kidneys suddenly stop working. - Respiratory failure, which means the lungs couldn't provide enough oxygen to the body or remove carbon dioxide. - Heart rhythm problems (arrhythmia), which can be life-threatening. - Accumulation of fluid in the abdomen (ascites), which can be due to various serious conditions. - Liver damage, which can affect the liver's ability to function. - Bone marrow failure, meaning the bone marrow doesn't produce enough new blood cells.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Severe Side Effects Abound with Amtagvi SEVERE CYTOPENIA According to what's been observed, almost half of the melanoma patients (45.5%) treated with AMTAGVI had prolonged severe cytopenia, meaning a severe drop in their blood cells that didn't get better to a milder condition or lasted for more than 30 days after the treatment. Specifically, the types of blood cell count drops seen were: Thrombocytopenia: A decrease in platelets, which help with blood clotting (30.1% of patients). Lymphopenia: A decrease in lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell important for immune response (19.9% of patients). Neutropenia: A decrease in neutrophils, white blood cells that fight infection (17.3% of patients). Leukopenia: A general decrease in white blood cells (14.7% of patients). Pancytopenia: A decrease in all types of blood cells (1.3% of patients).
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
When people are treated with AMTAGVI, there's a risk that they might experience bleeding inside their body aka Internal Hemorrhaging, specifically within the abdomen (the area that includes the stomach and other organs) or the brain. This kind of internal bleeding is very serious and can be life-threatening. In fact, such bleeding has been linked to the deaths of at least two people who were treated with AMTAGVI. One reason this bleeding can happen is because of a condition called thrombocytopenia, where the patient has a lower number of platelets in their blood. Platelets are tiny cells that help blood to clot, so if there aren't enough of them, bleeding can happen more easily.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
SEVERE INFECTION Severe infections were also associated with the treatment. Some of these infections were so severe they could lead to death. About 26.9% of melanoma patients treated with AMTAGVI had some level of infection because of the treatment. When we talk about "Grade 3 or higher infections," it means infections that are quite severe. Out of these, 13.5% of patients had serious infections, including 10.9% where the cause of the infection wasn't identified and 3.8% where the cause was known. Febrile neutropenia is considered an emergency in medical care, especially in patients with cancer or those receiving chemotherapy, because their immune systems are already weakened, making them more susceptible to infections. Treatment typically involves hospitalization, administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics to fight potential infections, and other supportive care measures to help the patient recover while the underlying cause of the neutropenia is addressed.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Heart Related Issues In a group of 156 patients who received AMTAGVI, about 9% (which is 14 people) had serious heart-related issues because of the treatment. These problems included: Tachycardia: A faster than normal heart rate. Atrial fibrillation: An irregular and often rapid heart rate that can increase the risk of strokes, heart failure, and other heart-related complications. Arrhythmia: Any irregular heartbeat. Acute myocardial infarction: Also known as a heart attack, where blood flow to the heart is blocked. Cardiac ventricular thrombosis: A blood clot in the heart's ventricles, which are the two lower chambers of the heart. Cardiomyopathy: A disease of the heart muscle that makes it harder for the heart to pump blood to the rest of the body. QT-prolongation: A condition that can cause unpredictable changes in the heart rhythm, which might lead to sudden, dangerous heartbeats. One person who received AMTAGVI died due to cardia arrhythmia.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Clinical Trials Experience 156 adults who have unresectable or metastatic melanoma were given AMTAGVI. This treatment wasn't given alone; it was part of a combination that also included three other treatments: cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and IL-2 (also known as aldesleukin). Unresectable means the cancer couldn't be removed with surgery. Metastatic means the cancer has spread from where it originally started to other parts of the body. Cyclophosphamide Cyclophosphamide is a type of chemotherapy medication. It works by slowing or stopping the growth of cancer cells in the body. Cyclophosphamide is used to treat various types of cancer by damaging the DNA of cancer cells, which makes it hard for them to divide and grow. Some adverse reactions associated with it are bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, hair loss, bladder irritation and it can effect fertility. Fludarabine Fludarabine is another chemotherapy drug, but it's often used to treat certain types of blood cancers, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and some types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It works in a similar way to cyclophosphamide, by interfering with the DNA inside cancer cells, which prevents them from multiplying. Some adverse reactions include immunosuppression, neurological effects, bone marrow suppression and nausea/fatigue. IL-2 (Aldesleukin) IL-2, or aldesleukin, is different from the first two treatments because it's a type of immunotherapy rather than chemotherapy. IL-2 stands for Interleukin-2, which is a naturally occurring protein in the body that plays a role in activating the immune system. As a treatment, aldesleukin is a synthetic form of this protein and works by boosting the body's own immune response to help fight cancer. Some adverse reactions include capillary leak syndrome, high fever and chills, heart problems and depression. In this study: The average age of the people involved was 56, but they ranged from 20 to 79 years old. About 54% of the participants were men. Before the study started, the health status of the patients was measured using something called the ECOG performance status, which helps to describe a patient's level of functioning. 68.6% of the patients were graded as ECOG 0, meaning they were fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 31.4% were graded as ECOG 1, meaning they were restricted in physically strenuous activity but could walk and carry out light or sedentary work.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
EFFICACY ENDPOINTS It is important to understand how Efficacy was established for this study, in other words what is considered a success? Let’s break down these terms to get a better understanding of what they are looking for. It is based on something called Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DoR) and Median Time to Initial Response. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) is a way to measure how well a cancer treatment works. Specifically, it looks at the percentage of patients whose cancer shrinks or disappears after treatment. If a treatment has a high ORR, it means that a significant number of patients had their cancer reduce in size, which is a good sign that the treatment is effective. The Duration of Response (DoR) is about how long the positive effects of the treatment last. After a patient's cancer responds to treatment by shrinking or disappearing, the DoR measures how long these benefits continue before the cancer starts growing again or becomes noticeable. A longer DoR means that the treatment's effects are lasting for a good amount of time, which is what doctors and patients hope for. This term refers to the middle value in the range of times it took for patients to first see a response to the treatment. In the case of AMTAGVI, the median time to initial response was 1.5 months, with the quickest response being at 1.3 months and the slowest at 4.2 months. This means that half of the patients started seeing their tumors reduce or go away at or before 1.5 months after starting the treatment. It gives an idea of how quickly you might expect to see results from the treatment.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Out of the original 160 people who received the treatment, ultimately only 73 patients were a part of the main analysis of how well AMTAGVI worked, less than half of the original.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So ORR was at 31.5% who experienced a reduction in their tumor with a confidence interval of 21.1% - 43.4%. Considering the sample size being so low, I am not sure I would be too amazed by these results. Especially when we consider the rates of adverse reaction which we will get to next. Let’s break this down a bit further first. 3 out of the 73 patients (4.1%) complete response rate had their cancer disappear. 20 out of the 73 (27.4%) partial response rate, had tumor shrink The number (4.1, NR) tells us the shortest observed duration was 4.1 months, and 'NR' means 'not reached,' indicating that the end point of the response period hadn't been reached for many patients by the time the data were analyzed. Patients with DoR ≥ 6 months: More than half of the patients (56.5%) or 13 patients who responded to the treatment had their cancer stay smaller for at least 6 months. Patients with DoR ≥ 9 months: Nearly half (47.8%) or 11 patients who responded to the treatment had their cancer stay smaller for at least 9 months. Patients with DoR ≥ 12 months: A little less than half (43.5%) or 10 of the patients who responded had their cancer stay smaller for at least 12 months.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
ADVERSE REACTIONS Let’s breakdown the adverse reactions observed in the trial. Now remember all of these with the exception of Febrile neutropenia are in addition to the conditions the FDA issued a “black box” warning over. This trial started with 160 people, 156 of which ended up being treated with AMTAGVI. Here are the results for adverse reactions observed by type. This is accounting for adverse reactions in the total amount of individuals who received the infusion. As you’ll recall, only 73 were included in the final analysis.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
These abnormalities were observed from the time of AMTAGVI infusion to 6 months afterward. Grades 3 and 4 are clinically significant and typically require intervention. (N=156) so obviously many experienced multiple of these conditions. Thrombocytopenia - 122 people (78.2%): A low platelet count, which can lead to increased bleeding and bruising. Neutropenia - 108 people (69.2%): A low count of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell, leading to increased risk of infection. Anemia - 91 people (58.3%): Low red blood cell count, which can cause fatigue, weakness, and shortness of breath. Leukopenia - 73 people (46.8%): Low white blood cell count in general, which also increases infection risk. Lymphopenia - 66 people (42.3%): A reduced count of lymphocytes, another type of white blood cell, leading to a compromised immune system. Hypophosphatemia - 40 people (25.6%): Low levels of phosphate in the blood, which can lead to muscle weakness, respiratory failure, and heart problems.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The two tables following the package insert information provided below, breakdown the reaction type that led to death and overall deaths.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I struggle to put myself in the shoes of the researchers and regulators who worked on this. Who after seeing all of this data on deaths and adverse events can declare these results a success. Fast tracked nonetheless by the FDA, a trend that we are seeing increase rapidly post-covid. It is so urgent that we need to get this stuff into people’s bodies asap, significantly increasing their short term mortality risk, this according to their own data and then lovingly charging them $515K for the privilege. After all, “we warned you.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Conflicts of Interests and the Study Authors Buried under hyperlinks and almost deliberately difficult to navigate to are conflict of interest statements. Each author listed has to provide what they feel could be perceived as a conflict of interest. Meaning some other source of income or association that given the study subject could potentially have influenced them in some way. Perhaps a charitable interpretation of data, a study design flaw, a questionable methodology, potential financial incentives or social incentives. The list of potential conflicts is too numerous to print here. With that under consideration and also keeping in mind the data we just went through, I invite you to get to know 21 authors who are credited with the studies while weighing their COI’s with the data as well as the potential career/financial incentives. After you’ve done so, ask yourself, “if I had this stage of melanoma, how confident would I be accepting this treatment?” The story is yet to be told since it has already been approved based on short term data. I guess the public is the price gauged guinea pig at this point and that my friends, is the point.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Author Conflicts of Interest Statements JASON CHESNEY Consulting or advisory role with Amgen. Research funding from Replimune, Amgen, Iovance Biotherapeutics, and Fate Therapeutics. KARL D. LEWIS Received honoraria from Array BioPharma and Iovance Biotherapeutics. Consulting or advisory role with Array BioPharma, Merck, Roche, Regeneron, Sanofi, Iovance Biotherapeutics, and Nektar. Research funding from Roche/Genentech, Merck, Array BioPharma, Incyte, Nektar, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kartos Therapeutics, OncoSec, Regeneron, Alkermes, Neon Therapeutics, Ultimovacs, Senhwa Biosciences, Replimune, Amgen, and Seagen. Travel, accommodations, and expenses from Merck, Roche/Genentech, Regeneron, Neon Therapeutics, and Alkermes. Uncompensated relationships with Roche/Genentech and Regeneron. HARRIET KLUGER Consulting or advisory role with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clinigen, Shionogi, Chemocentryx, Calithera, Signatera, GigaGen, GI Reviewers, and Merck. Research funding from Apexigen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck. OMID HAMID Received honoraria and consulting or advisory role with numerous pharmaceutical companies, including Aduro, Akeso, and Amgen. Research funding from several companies, including Arcus, Aduro, and Amgen. Speaker’s bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi Regeneron. Eric Whitman Consultant or advisory role with Merck. Research funding received as site principal investigator for multiple studies. Speaker’s bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Regeneron, and Castle Biosciences. Sajeve Thomas Honoraria, consulting or advisory role, research funding, speaker’s bureau, and covered travel expenses with companies like Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck. Martin Wermke Received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Consulting or advisory role with a list of companies including Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis. Research funding from Roche. Travel and expenses from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, and others. Mike Cusnir Speaker’s bureau participation with Sirtex Medical. Evidio Domingo-Musibay Received honoraria from Castle Biosciences. Consulting or advisory role and speaker’s bureau with Regeneron. Research funding from Clinigen. Giao Q. Phan Honoraria from IBSA. Consulting or advisory role with Acella, Amneal, and Terns. Patents, royalties, or other intellectual property with Virginia Commonwealth University. John M. Kirkwood Consulting role with numerous companies including Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck. Research trial support to institution from companies such as Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis. Jessica C. Hassel Received honoraria for talks from various companies including Almirall and Amgen. Advisory boards for companies such as GSK and MSD. Research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sun Pharma, and Sanofi. Travel, accommodations, and expenses from Sun Pharma. Marlena Orloff Consulting or advisory role with TriSalus, Immunocore, Ideaya, and Delcath. Her husband is an employee of GSK. James Larkin Received honoraria from companies including Eisai and Novartis. Consulting or advisory role with companies such as iOnctura and Merck. Research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, and others. Travel, accommodations, and expenses from Pierre Fabre, Roche, and GSK. Jeffrey Weber Owns stock or other ownership interests in Biond, Instil Bio, OncoV4, and Evaxion. Honoraria and consulting or advisory role with companies including Bristol-Myers Squibb and GSK. Research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Moderna, Merck, and others. Patents, royalties, or other intellectual property with Moffitt Cancer Center and Biodesix. Andrew J.S.Furness Consulting or advisory role with Immunocore and GSK. Speaker’s bureau participation with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, and Eisai. Travel, accommodations, and expenses from ESMO. Nikhil I. Khushalani Owns stock and other interests in companies like Bellicum Pharmaceuticals. Consulting or advisory role with several companies including Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. Research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, and others. Theresa Medina Consulting or advisory role with companies including Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Iovance Biotherapeutics. Michael E.Egger Consultant or advisory role with Iovance Biotherapeutics. Research funding from SkylineDx. Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, Madan Jagasia, Parameswaran Hari, Giri Sulur, WenFriedrich Shi, and Xiao Wu Are employees of Iovance Biotherapeutics and hold stock and/or stock options. FGF is in a leadership position at Iovance Biotherapeutics; owns stocks from other biotech and pharmaceutical companies; and holds patents or other intellectual property. PH additionally received honoraria and has been paid for consultant or advisory roles by various companies and received travel accommodations from others. Amod Sarnaik (Corresponding Author) Received honoraria and consulting or advisory roles with Iovance Biotherapeutics and other consultancies. Holds patents, royalties, or other intellectual property with institutions like Moffitt Cancer Center. Nothing to see here.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Notice how tedious they make it to extract COI’s in a easily readable form.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you have made it this far, I commend you. I know this thread has not been an easy one to follow but I hope I have conveyed the issue at hand properly. Namely that we have government and industry working hand in glove for decades to get these drugs to market and we are supposed to take their word for it when they "fast track" these drugs and ignore the unbelievable amounts of COI's. They are willing to overlook horrendous side effects in order to kick open the regulatory door and open the floodgates of profit indefinitely. All at the expense of the public whom they are essentially experimenting on for profit.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you have found this thread valuable please consider giving me a follow so you can keep up to date with all of threads I do. Like These:
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Finally if you would like to support and share my work, check out my substack. This thread was derived from an article of the same name and content I just published. Read and Subscribe here: https://wethefree.substack.com/p/the-fda-just-fast-track-approved
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Thread 🧵 New research reveals extensive conflicts of interest among the presenters, panelists and moderators who participate in the FDA’s hematology and oncology workshops. https://t.co/sIAio6bGVj
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The paper, published in the European Society for Clinical Investigation analyzed financial ties between advisors and drug companies. Of course what they found only confirms what anyone who has been paying attention already knows. https://t.co/lsmdPUjLCt
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
That we have a system that is so irredeemably corrupt that is simply cannot be entrusted to have our best interests at heart. Every single level is awash in conflicts of interests both blatant and expertly hidden.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The study examined presenters, panelists, and moderators at FDA workshops from 2018 to 2022, finding that 78% of U.S.-based physician participants received industry payments within five years prior. The analysis focused on general payments, which do not include research funding, revealing an average annual payment of $16,434 within the study group. This amount surpasses the average annual payment of $7,750 typically received by physicians in this field.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Workshops are uniquely different from advisory committee meetings because they focus on comprehensive regulatory strategies for a particular disease condition rather than being linked to specific drug products. While FDA commissioners cannot directly accept money from the industry to avoid potential bias, there exist several less obvious mechanisms within the agency that result in financial conflicts of interests, workshops and panels being two of them.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
On average, these payments were substantial. The average general payment over 5 years was $82,170, which breaks down to $16,434 per year, well above the median of $2,981 per year. Among the 52 organizations represented, 56% (n= 29) received funding from the industry based on the description of supporters on their webpage or their tax filings.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
23% received between $10,000 and $50,000 per year, 8% received between $50,000 and $100,000 per year and the top 3% received above $100,000 per year https://t.co/VRD1aebaVe
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is not just physicians, a whopping 69% of patient advocacy speakers represented organizations financially supported by the pharmaceutical industry. The study also highlighted the “revolving door” politics, showing 16% of regulatory agency representatives later worked for the pharmaceutical industry, and 12% of industry reps had regulatory backgrounds.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is the percentage of presenters, panellists and moderators with a conflict of interest among US physicians, representatives of regulatory agencies and representatives of patient advocacy organizations. https://t.co/08rLvUPsjv
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The diagram below illustrates the average annual general payments made to US-based physician presenters, moderators, and panelists, where the highest 3% earn over $100,000 annually. https://t.co/tM5GbyWJ8w
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Disclosure issues compound the problem. Only 50% of the presenters reviewed had disclosed their financial conflicts of interest during the workshops, with discrepancies found in the data from the Open Payments database.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This study highlights the myriad ways that government and industry are intertwined in hidden ways, all the while insisting they are independent and solely in it for the health of the people they exploit for profit. It truly is “turtles all the way down” with these people and unless we have a major reformation nothing is going to stop the exploitation of the populace at the hands of greed filled ego maniacs with a messiah complex. Here is a link to the study referenced if you’d like to read it yourself: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1APbxEqbwJbNCMT8Ffw0aw2ws1mabMnbs/view?usp=drivesdk
@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra
BREAKING NEWS NETHERLANDS: ‘It’s an absolute disgrace that the Princess Maxima Center is trying to distance itself from one of its most distinguished academics regarding a very thorough and meticulously peer reviewed paper. For all those critical thinkers with high ethical principles a substantial link with the covid vaccines and excess deaths is clearly based on irrefutable evidence. All those trying to undermine what is likely to turn out to be the greatest medical mistake and corporate crime in history are either incompetent, immoral or both’
@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: In the Netherlands one of the leading newspapers wrote a hit piece directed against the balanced and carefully phrased Mostert et al. (BMJ Public Health) paper that suggested a possible link with covid vaccines and excess deaths. Instead of defending her, her home institution, the Prinses Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, threw the authors under the bus. They distance themselves from the study and are investigating possible wrongdoings. https://www.prinsesmaximacentrum.nl/en/news-events/news/the-princess-maxima-center-distances-itself-from-publication-excess-mortality-during-covid-19-pandemic Mostert is an experienced and courageous researcher, who has previously been applauded for taking on the topic of corruption and conflicts of interest in medical practice in middle and lower income countries. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31657188/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26248847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22106048/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32613805/ Interesting question in this regard, did the experts cited in the hit piece disclose their potential conflicts of interest? Also the Princess Maxima Center receives funding from the pharmaceutical industry (€800,000 according to their 2023 statement), including from Pfizer sponsored clinical trials and AstraZeneca sponsored projects. Shouldn't the Princess Maxima Center recuse itself from the investigations because of potential conflicts of interest?
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
A : I’m sick and tired of individuals who believe there are no conflicts of interest within the FDA, CDC, and NIH. They can remove what stories they want, like this one to try to hide it, but there’s always other sources. This link is not available. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2824834?resultClick=…
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
This one is available but they try to downplay the issue. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545012/
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Yes, they are very aware of the conflict of interest problem. However, they really do value their investors. Most of which are pharma companies. They make investing a cinch and let them know about royalties. https://www.cdc.gov/os/technology/techtransfer/inventors.htm
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Their royalty rates are extremely profitable. Here’s an example. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Frequency-of-royalty-rates-paid-by-the-top-15-pharmaceutical-companies-5_fig2_312519641#:~:text=According%20to%20one%20study%2C%20the,·0%25%20being%20most%20frequent.
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
They even have a book explaining how all this works for biomedical research and drugs. https://techtransfercentral.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/Royalty-Rates-for-Pharmaceuticals-and-Biotechnology-8th-Edition-Sample-Pages.pdf
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Companies even profit selling their patents to other companies. I wonder what they charge for that. 🤔 https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizers-deal-medicines-patent-pool-includes-35-companies-12-countries-produce-generic
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Under a 1984 law known as Bayh-Dole, government scientists have a unique arrangement. They can collect royalties from pharmaceutical companies for discoveries they make while working for us https://fullmeasure.news/news/shows/conflicts-of-interest-02-23-2023
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
They even have their own Coalition!https://bayhdolecoalition.org
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Once you have seen how it works or read up on it, it’s hard to unsee it or not think about it every time you see a pharmaceutical commercial or have a doctor shove the latest drug at you with their prescription notepad. You may wish that you could forget. https://t.co/iNYZ3wEoOo
@missyTHX1138 - Melissa 🐭
Any typos found please forgive me. When I’m angry it’s even harder for me to spot them, and I refuse to pay for a blue check just to be able to correct a few mistakes.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
🧵THREAD: @PeterHotez is a sincere and non-corrupt scientist who has been right about everything in the last four years.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
1/ @PeterHotez has been spreading lies from the beginning. For example, in May 2021, he advocated vaccinating children to achieve herd immunity. His narrative was uncritically pushed by the MSM, and millions of children were harmed because of him. (Just look at his eyes!)
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
2/ The problem is that until April 2020, he was claiming the opposite. Back then, Hotez expressed concerns about a potential vaccine for the seasonal cold virus. But how did it come to pass that he suddenly changed his opinion and labeled all critics as anti-science?
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
3/ Here too, the “follow the money” principle applies. It appears that Peter Hotez is a conscienceless mouthpiece who will do anything for money. In this case, he received funds from the @gatesfoundation. I doubt that these were the only financial contributions he received.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
4/ It is therefore not surprising that Hotez changes his stance on the typical clinical trials of vaccines in no time. But just see for yourselves – your jaws will drop.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
5/ Yet, the most dangerous aspect of Hotez is his use of language and the demonization of those who think differently. He did not hesitate to label critical people as anti-science and anti-Semitic, even going so far as to demand that they be treated like terrorists. He stated...
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
6/ "The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires a counteroffensive.” https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01084-x
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
7/ In this very publication,@PeterHotez even managed to integrate his hatred of Russia, which has absolutely nothing to do with the Covid vaccines, and his supposed witch-hunt against the "anti-scientists." He also wrote, "The United Nations and the highest levels of governments must take direct, even confrontational, approaches with Russia and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States." - What the fvck, Peter?
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
8/ As if this wasn’t already enough, one of his publications reveals the absurdity of his pseudo-scientific fantasy, claiming that we need malnutrition vaccines. In September 2022, Hotez once again managed to publish his mental diarrhea in another high-impact journal. https://t.co/18HHvHdPh1
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
9/ Last June, Hotez said that ‘disease X’ is coming, that will be much worse than Covid. This raises 4 questions: ▪️How'd he know? ▪️Why does he still live that unhealthily? ▪️When will he finally get arrested for his involvement in GoF research? ▪️How much did Pfizer pay him? https://t.co/hK7ESSnpRl
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
10/ “We have some big-picture stuff coming down the pike starting on January 21st…” Hotez said this just last week, referencing January 21st — just one day after Trump’s inauguration. He’s telling you their plans right to your face, knowing he's protected by those in power. https://t.co/HWuBRbgivB
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
11/ Btw: Whenever someone criticized Hotez in the past, his friends and fellow believers came crawling out of the woodwork to discredit them as anti-Semites. In this case, @GYamey associated "evil" with Judaism. And these were the ‘experts’, MSM listened to for 3 years. FAIL! https://t.co/Z3pOCylq8i
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
12/ Holding a PhD in biotech and having worked in academia for over 10 years, I’m done with science. One reason for this is people like @PeterHotez, who participate in propaganda videos like this one. I’ve now become a citizen journalist to combat this corruption. Follow me! https://t.co/tqRhayD4q7
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
PENN/IQVIA: Well, well, well. How the turntables. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 👺OBSERVATIONAL HEALTH DATA SCIENCES AND INFORMATICS (OHDSI) *UPENN/PFIZER/HCQ: As it turns out, much of the BULLSHIT “HCQ doesn’t work!” & “PFIZER VACCINES WORK!” DATA that’s largely coming from UPENN (and others) and is being purported by @jsm2334 here… …is being created basically out of thin air, in collaboration with none other than: 👺IQVIA (🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣) *NOTE: This is the ‘trials data’ that we’re totally NOT ALLOWED to see but should all just ‘trust him, bro’ on anyways. And why is IQVIA so important again? Welp… 👺Remember when those (Goldman Sachs-funded) “ON-CAMPUS PROTESTS” happened earlier this year, and I caught the RACHMUTH CREW SPYING ON COLLEGE STUDENTS/FACULTY/STAFF in coordination with fucking MOSSAD/ICC/Israeli MoSA? 👺And how MOSSAD was literally THREATENING AMERICAN COLLEGE STUDENTS with using FACIAL RECOGNITION SOFTWARE against any of them who weren’t “SUFFICIENTLY PRO-ISRAEL”, in order to FUCK UP THEIR FUTURE CAREER PROSPECTS and “MAKE THEIR DEGREES BECOME WORTHLESS”? 👺And how they proceeded to DOXX students/faculty/staff/executive leadership/trustees, tried getting them removed/fired/expelled and even SUCCEEDED at REMOVING THE UPENN PRESIDENT & A TRUSTEES BOARD MEMBER? Yeah, your boy does NOT. FUCKING. MISS.🇺🇸🫡
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
@jsm2334, You should get it through your thick head that you’ll want to choose your words and steps wisely going forward. And be careful about throwing out big, defamatory words like “baselessly” at people you don’t know. Someone might just call your punk ass to the canvass for lying one of these days, “Prof”. PS: Tell Julie Platt, Marc Rowan, Leon Black, Ramanan Raghavendran, Ben Levitan, Herb Kleinberger, Jeff Hurst and the rest of the Staley Capital fa***ts up in Boston, MA we all said hello. We’ll see them soon. *By “Staley Capital”, I of course mean IN-Q-TEL, Cerberus, UJA (Mossad), Michael Crow, Apollo Global Management, Chris Darby, etc.
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
Wanna see some creepy PROPHETIC shit? *Check out how ODDLY-SPECIFIC AF my comment here was from THREE MONTHS AGO: ✅09/08/2024: “Sloan is NO DIFFERENT than MARC ROWAN at APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, UJA & WHARTON SCHOOL…” *As luck would have it, that’s because they ARE no different. They’re literally WORKING TOGETHER. 👺SLOAN RACHMUTH’S HUSBAND, GUY RACHMUTH, is SENIOR VP at IQVIA!!!🤣 *NOTE: It’s not like I ASKED for this freakish ability to recall/discern, or to acquire some mutant-level of intuition. But I’ll damn sure use the gifts God’s given me, just as He’s given to many others close to me whom I fight beside, for the purposes of WINNING this informational, spiritual, existential war. 💥PS: Shoutout to http://arkmedic.info and @Jikkyleaks for the OHDSI, IQVIA and PENN “PFIZER VAX/HCQ DATA” receipts!🔥
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
UPENN PERELMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 What are you actually DOING here? AYFKM? I mean… it’s all fake AF, isn’t it? Be honest.🤦🏻♂️ It’s just one big MOSSAD/IQT-controlled ops and espionage apparatus, staffed with a buncha LARP’ing Israeli spies pretending to have degrees and expertise they don’t have, isn’t it? I bet most of these clowns even have Tel Aviv in their earpiece every gat damn day helping them “wing it” through, coaching them on how to carry themselves and answer questions on the spot, just so Israel can steal from the American People and spy on our sons and daughters a little bit longer, amirite? Something tells me neither JEFFREY MORRIS (@jsm2334), nor UPENN, would survive even an halfway-thorough audit, be it accounting, accreditation or otherwise.
@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC
PENN/IQVIA: Well, well, well. How the turntables. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 👺OBSERVATIONAL HEALTH DATA SCIENCES AND INFORMATICS (OHDSI) *UPENN/PFIZER/HCQ: As it turns out, much of the BULLSHIT “HCQ doesn’t work!” & “PFIZER VACCINES WORK!” DATA that’s largely coming from UPENN (and others) and is being purported by @jsm2334 here… …is being created basically out of thin air, in collaboration with none other than: 👺IQVIA (🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣) *NOTE: This is the ‘trials data’ that we’re totally NOT ALLOWED to see but should all just ‘trust him, bro’ on anyways. And why is IQVIA so important again? Welp… 👺Remember when those (Goldman Sachs-funded) “ON-CAMPUS PROTESTS” happened earlier this year, and I caught the RACHMUTH CREW SPYING ON COLLEGE STUDENTS/FACULTY/STAFF in coordination with fucking MOSSAD/ICC/Israeli MoSA? 👺And how MOSSAD was literally THREATENING AMERICAN COLLEGE STUDENTS with using FACIAL RECOGNITION SOFTWARE against any of them who weren’t “SUFFICIENTLY PRO-ISRAEL”, in order to FUCK UP THEIR FUTURE CAREER PROSPECTS and “MAKE THEIR DEGREES BECOME WORTHLESS”? 👺And how they proceeded to DOXX students/faculty/staff/executive leadership/trustees, tried getting them removed/fired/expelled and even SUCCEEDED at REMOVING THE UPENN PRESIDENT & A TRUSTEES BOARD MEMBER? Yeah, your boy does NOT. FUCKING. MISS.🇺🇸🫡
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
BREAKING - Bird Flu 🙄 This thread will get you started on the Bill Gates' CDC latest attempt to Plan A Demic. Here's what I found published by the CDC today. THREAD.🇺🇸❤️
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is the same non-profit group paid for by Bill Gates that set the definition for what constitutes a COVID case on April 5, 2020. The CDC adopted their recommendations in violation of 3 Federal Laws on April 14, 2020 and COVID Fraud was born in the USA.
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' death certificate changes... Where did we see that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' to the CDC🙄 how to define a case for the Bird Flu. Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' the CDC to use PCR to diagnose again.🙄 Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' the CDC to use 'close contact' to diagnose again.🙄 Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' the CDC that if you cough ONCE... You can be diagnosed with Bird Flu.🙄 Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' the CDC not really care if they can distinguish one type of flu from another... Hi Deborah Bird... Just like last time huh?🙄 Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
The CSTE is 'recommending' the CDC to reference the WHO.🙄 Where have we seen that before? http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
So who wrote this 'position statement' for the CSTE, a non-profit, non-governmental organization controlled by Bill Gates? Yeah... The CDC. Hey @RobertKennedyJr is this how they will 'resign' ... By preventing the inauguration under the lie of an emergency?
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr Here is the new list of criminals at the CDC and CSTE... I have the old list right here too. http://www.BeyondTheCon.com
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr So what is the CDC doing in addition to rolling out criminals like Deborah Birx? Hmmm... Lying that person to person is on going.
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr Making sure another bioweapon is ready. Bill Gates has hundreds in development to choose from.
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr Publishing the sequence they created in GENBANK just like they did for COVID... Even though they cant prove it. Read the next post... In this thread.👇️
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr Seriously?! They're making this shit up again! If you fall for this one... 🙄
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr This is what Bill Gates and his 'the next pandemic will get their attention' smirk wants you to believe. That they sequenced it... So read the previous post again.👆️ It is illegal for any federal agency to lie to the taxpayer. @elonmusk DOGE the CDC.
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk They have been trying (and failing) to create this plandemic since Feb of this year. I suspect this is the 'in case of emergency break glass' hail lucifer attempt. Cant have @RobertKennedyJr heading the HHS.🇺🇸❤️
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Have you had enough yet Americans? I have. It's torch and pitchfork time.🔥
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk @RobertKennedyJr @DrJBhattacharya @AaronSiriSG @RenzTom @naomirwolf @wideawake_media @VigilantFox @ShannonJoyRadio @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @lifebiomedguru Y'all better take a look at this... They're using the COVID playbook again.🇺🇸❤️
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @DrJBhattacharya @AaronSiriSG @RenzTom @naomirwolf @wideawake_media @VigilantFox @ShannonJoyRadio @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @lifebiomedguru References... CSTE https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/position_statements_files_2023/24-ID-09_Novel_Influenza_A.pdf CDC https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/situation-summary/index.html https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-12232024.html
@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy
@RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @DrJBhattacharya @AaronSiriSG @RenzTom @naomirwolf @wideawake_media @VigilantFox @ShannonJoyRadio @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @lifebiomedguru @PoliticalMoons2 @welcometheeagle @JohnBeaudoinSr @DennisLinthicum @KimThatcherSD11 @stevejoncus @MdBreathe @Fynnderella1 @KLVeritas They're ramping up media coverage... Time to ramp up the facts.🤙🏽
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Calley Means Stuns CNN Viewers With Two Devastating Takedowns Live on Air Paul Offit and Pamela Brown came prepared for a debate. What they received was a reckoning. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/iUBRquJ8Hf
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Calley Means (@CalleyMeans), ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic, came out swinging on CNN Wednesday in a fiery debate against infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Paul Offit. Offit thought he could call RFK Jr. an anti-vaxxer without his own financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry being exposed—but he was wrong. Things immediately got heated when Means exposed Offit’s shocking conflicts of interest on live TV while CNN’s Pamela Brown stood by and let it happen like a deer caught in headlights. “What’s causing distrust in public health authorities is conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. “Dr. Offit says that science is always settled when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure in kids. “Dr. Offit is talking about measles… But there were 300 deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have 38% of children right now with prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He’s focused on reorganizing the department. And that’s what we should be talking about, not this distraction,” Means argued.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans After Offit finished uncomfortably smiling during Means’ rebuke, he responded to the claims, saying, “I don’t have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company.” https://t.co/Z2KBFVNh7P
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
But Means later questioned: “Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee (ACIP) to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make?” https://t.co/uSf5aMFZoL
@calleymeans - Calley Means
Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make? https://t.co/Slm88xdWyH
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Offit went on to say that he doesn’t know what the cause of autism is, mentioning several “interesting” theories. However, he stated with certainty that vaccines are “the one thing that doesn’t cause autism.” “Vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children,” Offit said.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The next disaster for CNN unfolded when host Pamela Brown asked @CalleyMeans a vaccination question that completely backfired. Means flipped the script, using her question to highlight how the media obsesses over “measles” instead of focusing on health concerns that truly matter. PAMELA BROWN: “Is now a time to promote vaccines... especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these six states where, according to health officials, they are unvaccinated?" CALLEY MEANS: “Pamela, with respect, why aren’t you asking me about the fact that 50% of teens have obesity? There are breathless segments being run and seen on [infectious disease] day after day after day, Pamela. It’s breathless coverage of five measles cases. “Why aren’t we asking why 16% of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we’re only 4% of the world population? Because the CDC said our immune system—no, it is related, Pamela. And let me say why: because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. “The Democrats said the word ‘measles’ 25 times in the first hearing and said the words ‘obesity,’ ‘diabetes,’ and ‘chronic disease’ zero times. The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word ‘equity’ 25 times, said the word ‘vaccines’ countless times, and did not say the word ‘obesity’ or ‘diabetes.’ “There is a problem right now because this is not zero-sum. We are focused on a very small subset that’s important—we need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Offit, is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only: that they should be studied like any other product. “Dr. Offit, on the ACIP committee, has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books, not about being anti-vax, but about having good science. And Dr. Offit is calling him anti-vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. “Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the 92% of deaths in the United States, which is chronic conditions,” Means said.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Means continued to hammer the medical industry, exposing how it “doesn’t make money when children are healthy.” “Pharma doesn’t make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don’t make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the healthcare industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick,” Means said. Visibly frustrated as @CalleyMeans dismantled the narrative CNN wanted to push, Pamela Brown began frantically cutting him off before abruptly ending the segment, calling it a “spirited discussion.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
This debate made one thing clear: when mainstream news networks face someone who can challenge their narratives in real time, their arguments crumble, leaving viewers exposed to the truth. While it’s safe to say that @CalleyMeans won’t be invited back on CNN anytime soon, this segment should serve as a stark reminder that the media’s goal is to push narratives, not to report the truth or host an honest debate.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans Click here to watch the full debate below: https://t.co/g0bStZqgU0
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@calleymeans Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, Elon Musk recently shut down RFK Jr. critics with one profound statement. Read more below: https://t.co/dcrDfMmMzy
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Elon Musk Delivers a Powerful Statement on Bobby Kennedy Jr. Plus, more must-see moments from the Trump-Musk interview. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/AVPelCMAbh
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
In 2008, CBS actually aired a report by Sharyl Attkisson exposing how top vaccine advocates received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies—raising serious concerns about conflicts of interest in vaccine safety claims. Can you imagine the MSM airing such a report today? 🤣 Credit: @SharylAttkisson
@annaemcloughlin - Anna McLoughlin
Helen Petousis-Harris - received seed funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation - was paid by Pfizer to speak at events - was funded by Pfizer to do a research review on misinformation -received US$10mill from HHS to analyse adverse events to the jabs https://t.co/N4YvZ9PesK
@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri
For anyone contemplating getting an influenza vaccine (flu shot) or planning to pressure or mandate someone else to get one: A meta-analysis of existing flu shot studies of healthy children by Cochrane (effectively owned by vaccine zealot Bill Gates) concluded that despite decades of published studies, it “could find no convincing evidence that [flu] vaccines can reduce mortality, hospital admissions, serious complications, or community transmission of influenza.” [1] Read that carefully: no convincing evidence—none—that flu shots lowered the chances of dying, being admitted to the hospital, suffering serious complications from the flu, or transmitting flu to others. In fact, studies have found those vaccinated for flu have a statistically significant increased rate of respiratory illnesses. Meaning, it increases the risk of having other respiratory illnesses. For example, a placebo-controlled efficacy (not safety) study by researchers at the University of Hong Kong compared children receiving influenza vaccine with those who did not receive the vaccine. The study found no statistical difference in the rate of influenza between the groups but did find the vaccinated had a four times increased rate of non-influenza infections (“recipients had an increased risk of virologically confirmed non-influenza infections (relative risk: 4.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.31-14.8)”). [2] As another example, researchers at Columbia University found that the risk of “influenza in individuals during the 14-day post-vaccination period was similar to unvaccinated individuals during the same period (HR 0.96, 95% CI [0.60, 1.52])” but that the risk of “non-influenza respiratory pathogens was higher [in the vaccinated individuals] during the same period (HR 1.65, 95% CI [1.14, 2.38]).” [3] A study by the Cleveland Clinic of 53,402 of its employees across multiple states even found an increased risk of influenza among those vaccinated for influenza, explaining that the “cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.” [4] I discuss these and other studies in my book, Vaccines, Amen. [5] That said: get a flu shot, don’t get a fu shot. That’s freedom. Everyone should be free to choose. But nobody should be coerced to get this or any medical product, especially, ironically, when the data reflects it has a net overall increase in infections. If you do choose to get this product and are injured, you are always free to call our firm to represent you in the vaccine injury compensation program. [6] Sources: [1]https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004879.pub5/epdf/full [2]https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3404712/pdf/cis307.pdf [3]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29525279/ [4]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3.full.pdf [5] https://a.co/d/0DwP3Ux [6]https://www.sirillp.com/vaccine-injury-attorneys/
@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri
Note: Bill Gates does not own the Cochrane Collaboration, rather his affiliated organizations have provided funding, direct and indirect, to the Cochrane Collaboration. There is also no indication the lead author in the review cited above has received any direct funding from the Gates foundation and he has affirmed as much in writing. It no doubt took courage and conviction to follow and publish the evidence when it revealed findings regarding the influenza vaccine in healthy children that is contrary to what public health authorities often claim about this product. He and his colleagues deserve credit for publishing this review knowing it would result in headwinds from those whose beliefs about this product it offends and whose financial interests it impacts.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
It is time to begin documenting a #Plandemonium #GameOfThreads. https://t.co/GdRQDB5XPU
