reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - December 9, 2023 at 2:40 PM

Saved - July 18, 2024 at 3:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Gavin Newsom's potential entry into the 2024 presidential race raises concerns for Tucker Carlson. He describes Newsom as someone who can lie without showing any signs of guilt, a rare quality. Carlson questions Newsom's electability, highlighting California's corrupt political system. He expresses discomfort with someone from that political culture running for president, as it suggests winning without voter consent. Carlson believes the state's degraded condition is due to its political leadership.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

With The Very Real Possibility Of Gavin Newsom Entering The 2024 Presidential Race For Democrats It’s Important To Remember This Interview Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) “I know Gavin Newsom. And, um, you know, I think a lot about Gavin Newsom, uh, many different things about Gavin Newsom. But one thing I know for a fact about Gavin Newsom is he has the capacity to be the lighted lie detector test. Gavin Newsom will say anything he needs to say, not like Biden is not like this, actually. Whatever Biden's fault, he's not like this. Like, Biden would you know, he has, like, guilt. If he's lying to you, he gets twitchy. Gavin Newsom's palms don't sweat. His respiration doesn't increase. His body temperature doesn't change. Nothing changes in Gavin Newsom when he lies to your face, and there are not that many people like that, actually. That's a rare quality. Like, to lock down the state, to keep people's kids from getting an education, and to arrest people for surfing and then go have dinner at the French Laundry, like, most people couldn't do that. They'd just be like, I Interviewer: “You’re saying he's a sociopath? Just he can lie and not care.” Tucker Carlson: “I'm not a psychiatrist, but I so I don't know that I don't really know the category, and I'm not gonna diagnose him. But I'll just say in 50 years of being around a lot of people, I've met very few who can behave that way, very, very few. It's very unusual quality, and, of course, it's probably useful in politics.” Interviewer: “Is Is he electable? Is he electable? Yeah. Exactly. Are the American people gonna see that the way that you see it? Or” Tucker Carlson: “Well, as you know, the system in California does not include elections. I mean, it has nothing to do with what the people think. It's a it's a machine state. It's the most corrupt out of 50. Kamala Harris was, like, despised by most Californians, fornians, and she, you know, was a sitting US senator. Diane poor Diane Feinstein, my neighbor in Washington, I I don't I don't think she was a horrible person just for the record, but she was an encompass menace, and, like, she could have lived well beyond her death as a US senator. So it's like it's not a democratic state small d democratic state does not run on the basis of what the population wants, it's a fixed game in California. And so it does make me very uncomfortable that someone from that political culture, which is an utterly corrupt political culture, an authoritarian political culture could, like, enter a presidential race. Because, like, clearly, what are you running on if you're Gavin Newsom? As a native Californian, uh, you know, I know what the state was like in 1985 because I lived there, and it's completely degraded from that from that time and, like, how did that happen? Well, part of the big reason the big reason is the political leadership in the state. You've got nothing to run when are you running? Have you driven through LA recently? Like, seriously. So the fact that he would get in the race suggests, you know, they think that they can win without the consent of voters, and that freaks me out.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Gavin Newsom is described as someone who can lie without showing any signs of guilt, unlike Biden. The speaker questions his electability due to California's corrupt political system. They express concern about Newsom's potential presidential run, citing the state's degradation under his leadership. The speaker believes Newsom's entry into the race implies a lack of concern for voter consent, which worries them. Translation: The speaker discusses Gavin Newsom's ability to lie without guilt and questions his chances in a presidential race due to California's corrupt political system. They express concern about Newsom's leadership and worry about his disregard for voter consent.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Gavin Newsom and, you know, I I think a lot about Gavin Newsom, many different things about Gavin Newsom. But one thing I know for a fact about Gavin Newsom is he has the capacity to be the light at lie detector test. Gavin Newsom will say anything he needs to say, Not like Biden is not like this, actually. Whatever Biden's fault. He's not like this. Like, Biden would you know, he has, like, guilt. If he's lying to you, he gets twitchy. Gavin Newsom's palms don't sweat. His respiration doesn't increase. His body temperature doesn't change. Nothing changes in Gavin Newsom when he lies to your face. And, there are not that many people like that, actually. That's a rare quality. Like, to lock down the state, to keep people's kids from getting an education and to arrest people for surfing and then go have dinner at the French laundry. Like, most people couldn't do that. They'd just be like You're saying Speaker 1: he's a sociopath. Just he can lie and not care. Speaker 0: I'm not a psychiatrist, but I so I don't know that I don't really know the category, and I'm not gonna diagnose him. But I'll just say in 50 years of being around a lot of people, I've met very few who can behave that way. Very, very few. It's a very unusual quality, and, of course, it's probably useful in politics. Is he electable? Speaker 1: Is he electable? Yeah. Exactly. Are the American people gonna see that the way that you see it? Or Speaker 0: Well, as you know, the system in California does not include elections. I mean, it has nothing to do with what the people think. It's a it's a machine state. It's the most corrupt out of 50. Kamala Harris was, like, despised by most Californians, and she, you know, was a sitting US senator. Diane poor Dianne Feinstein, my neighbor in Washington, I don't I don't think she was a horrible person just for the record, but she was noncompass menace, and, like, she could have lived well beyond her death as a US senator. So it's like it's not a democratic state, small d democratic state. It's not run on the basis of what the population wants. It's a fixed game in California. And so it does make me very uncomfortable that someone from that political culture, which is an utterly corrupt political culture, an authoritarian political culture could, like, enter a presidential race because, like, clearly, what are you running on if you're Gavin Newsom? As a native Californian, you know, I know what the state was like in 1985 because I lived there, and it's completely degraded from that from that time. And, like, how did that happen? Well, part of the big reason the big reason is the political leadership in the state. You got nothing to run on. What are you running? Have you driven through LA recently? Like, seriously. So the fact that he would get in the race suggests, you know, they think that they can win without the consent of voters, and that freaks me out.

@JesseBWatters — Jesse Watters

Posted - January 12, 2024 at 2:20 AM

Saved - January 13, 2024 at 12:35 AM

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

Tens of millions of dollars went missing from Chicago Public Schools. The test scores went down and the money went missing. As for the Chicago Teachers Union? They've apparently refused an audit four times. @Austin__Berg exposes them. https://t.co/ca3JnhGeIv

Video Transcript AI Summary

Chicago Public Schools received nearly $3 billion in federal funding since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are concerns about missing funds and equipment. Around $23 million is unaccounted for, along with 77,000 laptops, iPads, and printers. The city spent $2.5 million on tracking software, but it has not been successful in locating the missing items. Additionally, an assistant principal was arrested for stealing $250,000, and a school clerk was arrested for embezzling $150. The president of the Chicago Teachers Union, Stacey Davis Gates, has refused to conduct an audit and sends her child to a private school. Critics argue that the union prioritizes its own political power over the interests of teachers and students.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, since COVID, Chicago Public Schools raked almost $3,000,000,000 in in federal funding. 3 years ago, the teachers union refused to go back to work even though they got a $100,000,000 to reopen the schools. And at the time, I predicted that the money would be pocketed. Watch. Not surprisingly, the numbers don't add up. There's 1,000,000 of dollars missing. I honestly think they're stealing, and I don't know how many times I have to say this. I should have said it more because, You guessed it, $23,000,000 just went missing. 77,000 laptops, iPads and printers have disappeared. They found a couple, but where'd the rest go? Well, the city spent 2 and a half $1,000,000 on tracking software, but it can't track them down. Also, 1 assistant principal was arrested for stealing a quarter $1,000,000, and a school clerk was arrested for embezzling $150. The test scores went down and the money went poof. What's the president of the Chicago's Teachers Union gonna say? Bulletin reported that Stacey Davis Gates refuses to conduct an audit, and she won't even send her kid to public school. Her son's at private. The Illinois Policy Institute's Austin Berg joins us now. I have a feeling we're gonna find a lot more missing money in laptops, aren't we? Speaker 1: Well, you wouldn't be surprised after we saw what the reaction, from the Chicago school board was today, which was a deafening silence. And your viewers might be wondering why that is. Well, who appoints the school board in Chicago? That is the mayor, Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson. Who does Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson report to? Well, that would be the president of the Chicago Teachers Union, who you mentioned his former employer and indeed his largest Financial backer for his campaign. And the interesting thing about the Chicago Teachers Union is that they do not really care about advancing the interests of parents, Of students, of taxpayers, they care or really even teachers, they care about advancing their own political power. So So it is not surprising when those people are put in a governance position that things like this happen. Speaker 0: So $23,000,000 went missing, and they don't wanna do any more audits. They haven't done any for 4 years. Speaker 1: The Chicago Teachers Union, by its own bylaws, says that it must produce an audit for its members every year. And this is Why I say that this union does not represent the interest of teachers because teachers have submitted more than a dozen formal requests to see the books of the Chicago Teachers Union, And they have been failed again and again. They have not produced an audit in 4 years. The Chicago Teachers Union Is an organization that takes $35,000,000 a year from teachers, just 17¢ of every dollar according to the Illinois Policy Institute Research, Actually goes to representing teachers. Speaker 0: Oh, so the rest of it either gets embezzled or gets plowed back into the pockets of politicians. That's the game. Right? Speaker 1: Administration leadership priorities, and yes, politics, 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars in politics. And we exposed all this in in our documentary Local One, which you can actually find at chicago teachers union dot com Because they did not actually purchase their own name as a URL with that $35,000,000. Speaker 0: All right. Savvy move. Go check out the doc. Thanks so much.

@elon_docs — ELON DOCS

Posted - September 22, 2024 at 4:23 AM

Saved - September 22, 2024 at 6:05 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I loved living in California, but getting things done here is incredibly difficult. Large projects often take at least two years to get approvals, and lawsuits are common. The state seems to need a crisis for any real deregulation or reduction in litigation. The Democratic Party is heavily influenced by unions and lawyers, who write legislation that favors lawsuits and large awards. This creates a cycle that stifles progress. For change to happen, there needs to be at least a small chance of a Republican being elected in California; otherwise, it feels like a one-party state.

@elon_docs - ELON DOCS

Elon Musk: California is de facto a one-party state where you can't get things done. "I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact. Ask anyone who's done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Two years, and you're doing well if you do it in two years. And you're going to get a ton of people who are going to sue you, just for the hell of it, basically. California's going to need a crisis to have deregulation and delitigation. The two entities that most control the Democratic Party are the unions and, secondarily, the plaintiff bar, basically, the lawyers that sue, especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic Party. Anyone who's familiar with the inside baseball of this will agree with me. This is, in fact, the case, especially in California. So, the issue is that the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California because they funded the election of the officials. The people who got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So, then they write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and get gigantic awards because they got the people elected. And you have this nightmarish circle. There has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one-party state." Conversation with @teslaownersSV, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary

California makes it difficult to complete large projects due to lengthy approval processes and frequent lawsuits. It can take two years to pass CEQA, and many people will sue. California needs a crisis to achieve deregulation and delitigation. Unions and plaintiff's lawyers control the Democratic party, especially in California. Lawyers write legislation to make lawsuits easy to win because they fund the elections of officials. This creates a cycle where elected officials favor those who helped them get elected. There needs to be above a 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California, otherwise it is a one-party state.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact, and ask anyone and anyone who's stood done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Oh, 2 2 years, and you're doing well if you do it in 2 years. And and you're gonna get a ton of people is gonna sue you just just for the hell of it, basically. California's gonna need, like, a crisis to have, to have deregulation, and delitigation. The the two entities that most control the Democratic party are the unions, and secondarily the the the plaintiff's boss. Basically, the lawyers that that that sue. Mhmm. Especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic party. Anyone who's who's familiar with the inside baseball of this is will agree with me. This is in fact the case, especially in California. So the issue is that the the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California, because they they they they funded the election of the officials, of of the the people that got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So they then write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and and get gigantic awards, because they got the people elected. And you have this sort of circle of it was a nightmarish circle. Mhmm. Until there has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one party state.

@5149jamesli — James Li

Posted - December 20, 2024 at 2:38 AM

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 3:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I may have uncovered a significant scandal in California regarding the alleged embezzlement of funds meant for homelessness. Despite Governor Newsom's claims of "unprecedented investments," an audit revealed a lack of transparency in spending. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria's housing deals appear to be overpriced luxury projects rather than genuine public housing. The Chelsea Investment Corporation, linked to these deals and incorporated in the Cayman Islands, raises further questions about financial practices and potential conflicts of interest. This situation suggests a deeper issue with missing funds and inadequate media coverage.

@5149jamesli - James Li

🚨 I may have uncovered a MASSIVE scandal in CA. Gavin Newsom claims $24B for homelessness went "missing". Well, I found evidence of CA officials possibly, allegedly, embezzling hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars through a sketchy Cayman Islands group! 🧐 🧵1/ https://t.co/glUUMnLbZR

@5149jamesli - James Li

2/ In response to an April 2024 audit which exposed that California did not know how money going to solving homelessness was being spent, Gov. Newsom responded by stating the results “did not surprise” him, but added that California has taken part in “unprecedented investments”. https://t.co/SXPGOBVBHX

@5149jamesli - James Li

3/ What kinds of "unprecedented investments" you might ask? Well, this is where things start to get sketchy. Enter Todd Gloria, the Mayor of San Diego, who has been on a tear — making housing deal after housing deal — which he claims will "address homelessness." https://t.co/YVmJj4EOJn

@5149jamesli - James Li

4/ But when you look at the deals being done, the price tags are astronomical: - $145 million project, 407 units - $150 million project, 270 units I don't know about you, but these look more like luxury condo investments disguised as "public housing projects". https://t.co/XeFKPINXRc

@5149jamesli - James Li

5/ But here is where things gets even sketchier. There is one investment group that pops up over and over again in all these city housing deals — the Chelsea Investment Corporation. https://t.co/yOZP4hY1U3

@5149jamesli - James Li

6/ Here's what we know about The Chelsea Investment Group: - a developer that specializes in "affordable housing" - incorporated in the Cayman Islands - HQ is in Carlsbad, CA - Founder, Jim Schmid - CEO, Charles Schmid https://t.co/z2HQ3RuJht

@5149jamesli - James Li

7/ You ready for a real doozy? Property records of their HQ address shows: - 2016: Sold for $3.5M, $3.15M financed. - 2023: Another transaction for an "undisclosed price," but $68M financed. The kicker, the lender is the SD Housing Authority. Not suspicious at all... 🤨 https://t.co/KFhh7rrYoB

@5149jamesli - James Li

8/ The building looks to now be owned by 13th & Broadway CIC, LP — a shell company of Chelsea. But here is where there begins to be more questions than answers. - How did the property jump 20x in value in 7 years? - Why is the SD Housing Authority functioning as their bank? https://t.co/h4adFsViLu

@5149jamesli - James Li

9/ One thing we do know: When Todd Gloria the chair of the San Diego's Budget and Finance Committee, records show the the Founder and then CEO of Chelsea Investment Corp. was a major donor to Gloria's campaign. Quid Pro Quo? 🤔 https://t.co/IuPqoATxPs

@5149jamesli - James Li

10/ A dig into UCC filings and liens — Chelsea Investment Corp. is leaving a nasty paper trail all over the country, so their entanglement with "public housing" is not limited to San Diego or California. I would advise you start looking in your local area to see what turns up. https://t.co/qtk9qjJZ4z

@5149jamesli - James Li

11/ Final thoughts: 1) This is just the tip of the iceberg in the search for billions of "missing" dollars. 2) Legacy media have failed — it’s up to independent journalists to uncover the truth. Big thanks to @AssyrianAngel28 and @Melissa_in_CA for their help!

@WesternLensman — Western Lensman

Posted - January 13, 2025 at 2:52 AM

Saved - January 13, 2025 at 6:01 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

While Los Angeles faces devastating fires, Governor Newsom and California legislators have agreed to allocate $50 million to bolster the state's legal defenses against the Trump administration. This funding aims to support immigrants at risk of deportation and includes $25 million for the state Department of Justice and another $25 million for nonprofit legal groups. This decision highlights California's priorities amid ongoing crises.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

🚨UNREAL: While LA is being devastated by fires, Newsom and CA legislators reach an agreement to allocate $50M to “Trump-proof” California. The funds will be used to fight Trump and looming deportations in court. From Politico: "Gov. Gavin Newsom and state legislative leaders have agreed to set aside $50 million to defend California — as well as immigrants facing deportation — in court against the incoming Trump White House, according to two people with knowledge of the negotiations." "The deal, struck through a special legislative session Newsom called to shore up the state’s legal defenses, includes $25 million he sought for state Department of Justice litigation against the federal government. It also contains $25 million state Senate leaders wanted for grants to nonprofit legal groups and centers that support immigrants who are at risk of deportation, detention and wage theft." ---- This is what California is choosing to spend money on right now.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

Source: https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/01/newsom-and-legislative-leaders-strike-50m-deal-to-trump-proof-california-00197729

POLITICO Pro: Newsom and legislative leaders strike $50M deal to Trump-proof California The special session agreement would fund litigation against the incoming White House and award grants to non-profit legal groups. subscriber.politicopro.com

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 16, 2025 at 9:45 PM

Saved - January 17, 2025 at 3:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared that Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass allocated funds from the LA Fire Department to support a transgender cafe. Just a day before the Pacific Palisades fires, she attempted to cut the Fire Department's budget by $49 million, raising concerns about her spending priorities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass used LA Fire Department money to fund a transgender cafe She also tried to cut the Fire Department budget by $49 million ONE DAY before the Pacific Palisades fires broke out “The budget resolution for 2024 to 2025 fiscal year shows some foolish spending. So there was a midnight stroll transgender cafe, which Karen Bass suggested a $100,000 slush fund, and that amount was fully approved by city council”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Karen Bass allocated funds from the Los Angeles Fire Department budget to support initiatives like a queer cafe and the Ebony Theater. Just before the Palisades fire, she proposed cutting nearly $49 million from the fire department, following over $17 million in cuts the previous year. This decision raises concerns about prioritizing spending in a state prone to disasters. The 2024-2025 budget includes a $100,000 fund for a transgender cafe, which was approved by the city council. Meanwhile, there are reports of numerous fire trucks that are unprepared for emergencies.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Karen Bass used fire department money to fund a queer occult interest in Ebony Theater and a Transcafe. So she had tried to slash almost $49,000,000 from the Los Angeles Fire Department budget one day before the Palisades fire started. This came after more than $17,000,000 in cuts the previous year. Okay? She didn't wanna she didn't wanna waste money, because we're in a state that's under a constant threat of disaster. So what did we fund instead? What did we use that money for instead? Well, the budget resolution for 2024 to 2025 fiscal year, shows some some foolish spending. So there was a midnight stroll transgender cafe, which Carabass suggested a $100,000 slush fund, and that amount was fully approved by city council. I saw a video today of just like a 100 fire trucks sitting there that need to prepare. We could use thank God for this cafe.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 29, 2025 at 2:47 AM

Saved - January 29, 2025 at 4:28 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Governor Gavin Newsom's allocation of $50 million to "Trump-Proof" California is intended to defend illegal immigrants from deportation, raising concerns about taxpayer money being used for this purpose. State Rep Bill Essayli questioned whether any of the funds would support criminal illegal immigrants, to which a Democrat Assembly member could not provide a guarantee. Essayli emphasized that grants to nonprofit groups could indeed be used for legal defenses. He criticized the timing of these bills, suggesting that focus should be on wildfire recovery instead.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Governor Gavin Newsom’s $50 million taxpayer dollars set aside to “Trump-Proof” California WILL go to defending CRIMINAL illegal aliens from deportation I’m not kidding, this is real. Also confirms more taxpayer money is about to be funneled to radical NGO groups California State Rep Bill Essayli, “So you're assuring us that none of this money will be used to defend criminal, illegal immigrants facing deportation. You're, gonna assure me of that?” Democrat California Assembly “I don't know that I can give you that level of guarantee” (So yes, they will be funding CRIMINAL illegal migrants fighting deportation) Bill Essayli “The grants that are gonna go to these nonprofit groups — What are they gonna do with the money? Would they use our tax dollars to defend illegal immigrants from deportation proceedings?” “This is incredibly tone deaf to be moving forward with these bills at this time. When we have residents who still are not in their homes, we should be focused on wildfire recovery, relief, and prevention.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Are you assuring us that none of this money will be used to defend criminal illegal immigrants facing deportation? As a budget staffer, I can only tell you what the grant is for; I can't guarantee that. What activities do you anticipate these nonprofit groups will undertake with the grants? Will tax dollars be used to defend illegal immigrants from deportation? I’m not certain about that; I would have to defer. If the deportation hearing is under criminal jurisdiction, the equal access fund is for civil matters. So, you're assuring us this money won't be used for deportation defense? These funds are for civil legal proceedings only. Is deportation not a civil proceeding? This is tone deaf, especially when residents are still without homes. We should focus on wildfire recovery and prevention. Please take this back to the governor.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So you're assuring us that none of this money will be used to defend criminal illegal immigrants facing deportation? You're you're gonna assure me of that? Speaker 1: Assembly member, as a budget staffer, I can only tell you what the the grant is for. I I don't know that I can give you that kind of that level of a guarantee. Speaker 0: On this fund, the grants that are gonna go to these, nonprofit groups, what sort of activities do you anticipate they're gonna do with these grants? What are they gonna do with the money? Would they use our tax dollars to defend illegal immigrants from deportation proceedings? Is that part of what they do? Speaker 1: Well, I'm not certain about that. I would have to defer probably. Speaker 0: Does someone here know? Speaker 2: If the deportation hearing is under a criminal justice jurisdiction, the this the equal access fund is for civil matters. Speaker 0: And you're assuring us that this money is not used to defend illegal immigrants from deportation proceedings? Speaker 1: Again, just to reiterate, these are for civil legal proceedings Right. Speaker 0: Only. So not deportation. Is deportation not a civil proceeding? I still Speaker 1: But again, it is the the intent Speaker 0: clarity. This is incredibly tone deaf to be moving forward with these bills at this time when we have residents who still are not in their homes. We should be focused on wildfire recovery relief and prevention. I don't think this is a sign of good faith, and I hope you take that back to the governor.

@LauraLoomer — Laura Loomer

Posted - February 8, 2025 at 4:30 PM

Saved - February 8, 2025 at 11:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m Steve Soboroff, recently appointed as the “Recovery Czar” for the fire recovery in the Palisades. I’ll be receiving $500,000 over three months, funded by charities intended for fire victims. This appointment by Mayor Karen Bass raises concerns about political corruption. It seems excessive to pay nearly $167,000 per month for consulting on rebuilding efforts.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨CORRUPTION IN CALIFORNIA🚨 This is Steve Soboroff. He has just been named the “Recovery Czar” for the fires in the Palisades that ravaged Los Angeles. He is going to be paid $500,000 over the next three months, and that money is coming from charities that were set up to help fire victims. The corrupt, communist Democrat Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass appointed Soboroff. Talk about political corruption. Why does he need to be paid nearly $167,000 PER MONTH for 3 MONTHS to “consult” the Mayor of LA on how to rebuild? @MayorOfLA

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 9, 2025 at 7:14 AM

Saved - February 10, 2025 at 1:08 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Teachers in California spend their time indoctrinating kids in DEI racism & sexism & communism, instead of teaching them the skills that help them succeed in life. This needs to STOP!

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸 CALIFORNIA TEACHERS DEMAND RAISES AS STUDENT SCORES HIT ROCK BOTTOM Only 29% of fourth graders can read proficiently, but California teachers averaging $101K salaries (plus $30K in pension benefits) want more money. The math doesn't add up: State spending up 250% since 2009 Test scores haven't improved 360,000 students have fled Meanwhile, schools that shut down longest during Covid now face layoffs as federal money runs dry. But don't worry - unions know the Sacramento ATM is always open. Source: Wall Street Journal

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 17, 2025 at 8:03 PM

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:05 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I just spent a semester teaching at a public school and was shocked by the state of our education system. Only 9% of the Department of Education's $268 billion budget actually supports K-12 education. While I loved the kids, I noticed significant issues with the administrators and bureaucracy. To access federal funding, schools must meet various criteria, which feels like a game for the administrators to secure funds. Unfortunately, none of this money reaches the teachers or students, highlighting a troubling trend of prioritizing financial gain over educational needs.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Attorney just spent a semester teaching at a public school, she can’t believe how bad our education system has gotten “Only 9% of the entire $268 billion budget of the Department of Education actually goes to K-12” “First and foremost, I loved the kids, but there are major problems within the school system. The administrators, the bureaucracy, the federal funding, and what I mean by that is in order to get some of this federal funding, you have to check off all of this criteria. And so it's just a game for the administrators and the establishment to try to money grab all of these different federal funds.” She then describes how none of the money makes it to the teachers or students or where it’s needed It’s all a money grab.

Video Transcript AI Summary

As an attorney and former public high school teacher, I've seen firsthand the issues within our education system. I loved my students, but the bureaucracy is stifling. Only 9% of the Department of Education's massive budget actually reaches K-12 schools. A lot of federal funding requires schools to meet certain criteria, turning it into a game for administrators to grab money. This funding often doesn't directly benefit teachers or students. Instead, it goes to programs that can make teachers' jobs harder. Why does the Department of Education spend over 90% of its budget on things other than K-12 education? What are your thoughts on this?

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Only 9% of the entire $268,000,000,000 budget of the Department of Education actually goes to k through 12. My name is Christine. I'm an attorney, but I just been a semester teaching at a public high school, title one public high school. And let me just tell y'all, there are problems. First and foremost, I loved the kids, but there are major problems within the school system. The administrators, the bureaucracy, the federal funding, And what I mean by that is in order to get some of this federal funding, you have to check off all of this criteria. And so it's just a game for the administrators and the establishment to try to money grab, all of these different federal funds. The funding doesn't go to the teachers that are actually in the classroom. It doesn't really directly impact the kids. A lot of times, it goes to programs that are created that quite frankly just make the teachers' lives more difficult. But what in the world why do we have a Department of Education at a federal level that over 90% of the budget is being spent elsewhere? And by that, I mean, not on kindergarten through twelfth grade. Let me know what y'all think.

@shellenberger — Michael Shellenberger

Posted - February 28, 2025 at 3:41 PM

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 10:38 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believed the LA fires would prompt action in California, but I was mistaken. A significant portion of these fires is linked to the homeless population, while the state lacks sufficient firefighters and resources. Instead of addressing these urgent issues, Governor Newsom is focused on his podcast and political battles. Despite warnings about impending disasters, funding for fire prevention was cut in favor of other priorities. The narrative that nothing could have been done to prevent the fires is misleading; leadership failures have led to this crisis. It's time for change in California's leadership.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

I thought the LA fires would wake California up. I was wrong. *Half* of LA fires are started by ~50k meth/fentanyl addicts/mentally ill homeless. LA has half the firefighters it needs. There's not enough hydrant water. And Gavin Newsom is focused like a laser on his podcast.

@GavinNewsom - Gavin Newsom

I'm launching a NEW PODCAST. We need to change the conversation. I'm talking directly with people I disagree with, people I look up to, and you -- the listeners. Egg prices? Tariffs? DOGE? We're tackling all your big questions. This is Gavin Newsom. Subscribe now ➡️ https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/this-is-gavin-newsom/id1798358255

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm launching a new podcast to change the conversation. It's going to be anything but your ordinary politician podcast. I will be speaking directly with people that I disagree with as well as people I look up to. More importantly, I'll be talking directly with you, the listener. Real conversations, no political mumbo jumbo. We'll tackle topics like the rising cost of eggs, the real impact of tariffs, the power of executive orders, and the inside scoop on Doge. There's an onslaught of information, so let's go straight to the sources. In the first few weeks, we're sitting down with some of the biggest leaders and architects in the mega movement, like Gavin Newsom.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We need to change the conversation, and that's why I'm launching a new podcast. And this is gonna be anything but the ordinary politician podcast. I'm gonna be talking to people directly that I disagree with as well as people I look up to. But more important than anything else, I'll be talking directly with you, the listener. Real conversations. What's going on with the cost of eggs? What are the impacts, real impacts to you around tariffs? What power does an executive order really have? And what's really going on inside of Doge? Look. There's an onslaught of information that we take in, so let's take it to the sources without the typical political mumbo jumbo. In the first few weeks, we're gonna be sitting down with some of the biggest leaders and architects in the mega movement. This is Gavin Newsom.

This is Gavin Newsom Listen to iHeartPodcasts's This is Gavin Newsom podcast on Apple Podcasts. podcasts.apple.com

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Everyone talks about the coming disastrous fires and "Big One" earthquake, so you'd think Gavin Newsom would be taking urgent action. He's not. Instead, he's attacking Trump and demanding $40 billion to pay for the LA fires that his leadership failures created. https://t.co/nAUPn6MeDZ

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Fire fighters and many others warned Gavin and LA's mayor that catastrophic fires were coming. In response, they cut funding for fire prevention and fire fighters. Why? Because they were focused on promoting DEI, transgenderism, and climate apocalypse https://t.co/pJ3X3f68OQ

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Over the next few weeks you’re going to hear Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Karen Bass, and the Democratic Party tell you that there’s nothing that could have been done to prevent the fires from destroying Los Angeles. Those will be lies. They could have prevented them. Governor Newsom cut the funding for preventing forest fires and failed to build sufficient water resources for fighting fires. Mayor Karen Bass cut $17.5 million in funding for the Los Angeles Fire Department and then went to Ghana even though she knew of the risk of catastrophic fires. It’s true that California, in general, and Los Angeles, in particular, are fiery places. It’s true that the Santa Ana winds made the fires worse. But Newsom and Bass have known about those hazards for all of their careers and failed to deal with them. Their rank incompetence and lack of leadership are shocking and scandalous. It’s hard to overstate how badly they screwed up water management. LA firefighters haven’t had the water they needed. Newsom hasn’t built the new water reservoirs that Los Angeles needed. And Newsom even cut the budget for water infrastructure projects last year. Why is that? Part of the reason is that they were focused on other things. Making the fire department more racially diverse. Climate change. Homelessness. And the reason they were focused on those things is because those are what the radical Left that controls the Democratic party wanted them to focus on. Year after year, they do nothing while focusing on things like trans and Trump and climate and ignoring the things that really matter to the people of California. The Democrats in California aren’t like Democrats in other states. They are radicals. I would know, since when I was a young radical I moved to California for that reason. As many of us get older, we become more moderate. We become more practical. We understand firefighters and police officers are necessary. We are reminded of the importance of things like safe streets and hard work and good schools. But more than that, I saw the consequences of radical progressive policies on the environment, homelessness, crime, education, water, and everything else. Violent criminals, in particular, are devouring Los Angeles, Oakland, and the rest of California. The people who control the Democratic Party in California worship books about Los Angeles, like City of Quartz by the Marxist author Mike Davis. In that book, Davis claims that the problem in Los Angeles is that too much money goes to things like firefighting to protect wealthy neighborhoods. They did the same thing on crime and homelessness. They failed to provide adequate funding to the police. They weakened the laws that allowed for burglaries and robberies. They subsidized homelessness, attracting homeless people from around the United States to camp illegally and start fires. Over half of the fires in places like Los Angeles and Oakland are caused by the homeless committing arson, often out of some petty revenge. We don’t know what started all of the fires, but at least one started within the housing subdivision. Others may have started in the interface between housing and wildlands. Or it could have been started by the homeless. Whatever the case, California and LA didn’t invest enough in preventing fires because they were distracted by radical Left causes. When Rick Caruso ran for Mayor against Karen Bass, he called for increasing the fire department’s budget. A big part of the reason he lost is simply because he was white. I watched focus groups in 2022 and the most racist people were white liberals in Los Angeles. When they discussed the mayoral race, the white people overwhelmingly said they couldn’t vote for a white man and had to vote for a black woman because she was black. The Latino men and women in separate focus groups were much less racist. They wanted to know about their policies. It was the radical Left that invented the racist idea that white people alive today should feel guilty about things white people did in the past. Racist white guilt led people in Los Angeles and California to vote against a guy who would have prevented those fires. And so, over the next few weeks, when you hear Governor Gavin Newsom, Mayor Karen Bass, and the Democratic Party tell you that there’s nothing they could have done to prevent the fires from destroying Los Angeles, don’t believe them. It’s time for California to grow up and move beyond the juvenile Leftism that has destroyed the state and destroyed Los Angeles. We can’t trust our leaders to run anything. It’s not just incompetence. It’s that they really don’t care. It’s time for Californians to demand new leaders — ones who aren’t beholden to the radicals who control the Democratic Party. .

Video Transcript AI Summary

Don't believe Gavin Newsom, Karen Bass, and the Democratic party when they say nothing could have prevented the Los Angeles fires. Newsom cut fire prevention funding and failed to build needed water resources. Bass cut millions from the LA Fire Department. They've known about these fire hazards for years but failed to address them, focusing instead on radical left causes like racial diversity and climate change. LA firefighters lacked necessary water, and Newsom cut water infrastructure budgets. The Democratic party is controlled by radicals, as I know from my own past. They prioritize things like race and climate over practical needs. They weakened laws, subsidized homelessness, leading to arson-caused fires. The left even chose Bass as mayor because she was a black woman, passing over a white candidate who would have focused on preventing these issues. It's time for new leadership in California, free from the radical left.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. It's Mike Shellenberger for Public. Over the next few weeks, you're going to hear governor Gavin Newsom, mayor Karen Bass, and the Democratic party tell you that there's nothing that could have been done to prevent the catastrophic fires from ravaging Los Angeles. Those will be lies. They could have prevented them. Governor Gavin Newsom cut the funding for preventing forest fires and failed to build sufficient water resources for fighting fires. Mayor Karen Bass cut 17,500,000 in funding for the Los Angeles Fire Department and then went to Ghana even though she knew of the risk of catastrophic fires. Now it's true that California in general and Los Angeles in particular are fiery places, and it's true that Santa Ana winds made the fires worse. But Newsom and Bass have known about those hazards for all of their careers and failed to deal with them. The rank incompetence, the lack of leadership is shocking and scandalous. It's hard to overstate how badly they screwed up water management in particular. Los Angeles firefighters haven't had the water they needed. Newsom hasn't built the new water reservoirs that Los Angeles needed. And Newsom even cut the budget for water infrastructure projects last year. So why is that? Well, part of the reason is that they were focused on other things, making the fire department more racially diverse, climate change, homelessness. And the reason they were focused on those things is because those are what the radical left that controls the Democratic party wanted them to focus on. Year after year, they do nothing while focusing on things like trans and Trump and climate and ignoring the things that really matter to the people of California. The Democrats in California aren't like Democrats in other states. They are radicals. And I should know since I was a young radical who moved to California for that reason. As many of us get older, we become more moderate. We become more practical, we understand that firefighters and police officers are necessary, and we're reminded of the importance of things like safe streets and hard work and good schools. But more than that, I personally saw the consequences of radical progressive policies on the environment, homelessness, crime, education, water, and everything else. Violent criminals in particular are now devouring Los Angeles, Oakland, and the rest of California. The people who control the Democratic Party in California worship books about Los Angeles like City of Courts by the Marxist author, Mike Davis. In that book, Davis claims that the prom in Los Angeles is there's too much money going to things like firefighting to protect wealthy neighborhoods. They did the same thing on crime and homelessness. They failed to provide adequate funding to the police. They weakened the laws that allowed for burglaries and robberies. They subsidized homelessness, attracting homeless people from all around the United States to camp illegally and start fires in California. Over half of the fires in LA and Oakland are caused by homeless people, mostly committing arson, often out of some petty revenge. We don't know what start all the fires in LA, but at least one started within a housing subdivision. Others may have started in the interface between housing and wild lands, or it could have been started by the homeless. Whatever the case, California and LA did not invest enough in preventing fires because they were distracted by radical left causes. When Rick Caruso ran for mayor against Karen Bass, he called for increasing the fire department's budget, but a big part of the reason he lost is because he was white. I watched focus groups in 2022 and the most racist people were white liberals in Los Angeles. When they discussed the mayoral race, the white people overwhelmingly said they couldn't vote for a white man and had to vote for a black woman because she was black. Interestingly enough, the Latino men and women in separate focus groups were much less racist. They wanted to know about the policies of the mayoral candidates. It was the radical left that invented the racist idea that all white people today should feel guilty about things that all white people did in the past. This racist white guilt led people in Los Angeles to vote against a guy who would have prevented those fires. And so over the next few weeks, when you hear governor Gavin Newsom, mayor Karen Bass, and the Democratic party tell you there's nothing they could have done to prevent those catastrophic fires from destroying Los Angeles, don't believe them. It's time for California to grow up and move beyond the juvenile leftism that has destroyed the state and destroyed Los Angeles. We really can't trust California leaders to run anything. It's not just incompetence. It's that they really don't care. Now is the time for Californians to demand new leaders, ones who aren't beholden to the radicals who control the Democratic party. Thanks for listening.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Gavin and the media promote the Big Lie that nothing could have been done to prevent LA's fires. It's all outrageous nonsense. People were raising the alarm for years. Dems defunded firefighting and fire prevention. https://t.co/hNRn1AOqpb

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Nothing could have been done to stop the catastrophic L.A. fires that killed 24, incinerated 12k homes, and cost $250B, say the media. Nonsense, says an LA firefighter. The failure by Newsom & Bass to mobilize firefighters before the fires began led to an avoidable catastrophe. https://t.co/bM7dgulyDn

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

People say, "California Democrats are incompetent." Well, duh. The question is why? The answer is they believe Indigenous genocide and slavery make America evil, and so they defund the things that protect civilization, like police and firefighting. https://t.co/E3dNBE4ONf

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

California is the richest state with the highest taxes and yet it cut funding for firefighting, which led directly to L.A.'s catastrophic fires. Why? Because Newsom & Bass diverted billions from preventing and fighting catastrophic fires to migrants, homeless, and climate. https://t.co/FVckx9qaDU

@libsoftiktok — Libs of TikTok

Posted - March 4, 2025 at 6:21 AM

Saved - March 4, 2025 at 9:38 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

New York Governor Kathy Hochul's administration is facing lawsuits that claim it manipulated the bidding process for a $9 billion homecare program, CDPAP. I shared a video highlighting the alleged corruption involved. The lawsuit details how the bidding for a Medicaid contract, partly funded by the federal government, was rigged. I believe this situation warrants investigation from the Justice Department and other authorities.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul’s administration has faced lawsuits alleging it rigged the bidding process for the state’s controversial overhaul of a $9 billion homecare program called CDPAP. Just typical Democrats being corrupt…

Lawsuit: NY Gov. Kathy Hochul Received Union Help for Rigging Bid of Healthcare Program New York Gov. Kathy Hochul faces lawsuits alleging a rigged bidding process for the controversial overhaul of a $9 billion homecare program. breitbart.com

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Here’s a video outlining the insane corruption in the bidding process

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

🚨BREAKING: Lawsuit details insane corruption from New York Governor Kathy Hochul where she RIGGED the bidding for a contract for a Medicaid program which is partially funded by the Federal Government. .@TheJusticeDept @DOGE @AGPamBondi should look into this. https://t.co/stb0v3hvB1

Video Transcript AI Summary

Governor Kathy Hochul is under fire for awarding a $9 billion contract to Public Partnerships LLC (PPL), an out-of-state company, to monopolize New York's Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP). This decision threatens nearly 700 local businesses serving hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers. A lawsuit alleges the NY Department of Health preselected PPL before a sham bidding process. Evidence suggests a cover-up, including reports of PPL's preselection before bidding began and the SEIU Health Care Workers Union announcing PPL had obtained the contract two months before submissions were due. A conflict of interest exists, as Public Consulting Group (PCG), which advises Hochul on medical policy, owns over 25% of PPL. Additionally, Hochul received a $5,000 contribution from PPL's VP of Government Relations in 2023. Representative Richie Torres is calling for a full investigation into the scandal, believing something is "rotten" in New York under Hochul's management.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Governor Kathy Hochul recently awarded a $9,000,000,000 contract to an out of state company to monopolize control over medical services that nearly 700 local businesses provided to hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers through a home care Medicaid program known as CDPAP. And herein lies the corruption. A lawsuit has been filed against the New York State Department of Health and the out of state company known as Public Partnerships LLC, or PPL for short. The lawsuit explains how the New York Department of Health preselected PPL as the winner of a multibillion dollar contract before the bidding process even took place. The State Department then ran a sham bidding process in order to cover up for that preselection. Evidence of this cover up includes the fact that multiple reporters and individuals at the Center for Disability Rights were informed by numerous sources of PPL's preselection prior to the bidding. Two months before submissions were due, the eleven ninety nine SEIU Health Care Workers Union announced that the DOH had informed them that PPL had obtained contract. Additionally, Public Consulting Group, an organization that advises Governor Hochul on medical policy and Medicaid reform, just so happens to own more than 25% of PPL through a 16% general ownership with the remainder being owned by three PCG executives. This is a clear conflict of interest. It has also been reported that Kathy Hulcol received a $5,000 contribution in 2023 from PPL's Vice President of Government Relations, further raising suspicion about her direct ties to the company. The DOH played an extended role in carrying out this fraud by also reportedly manipulating and failing to enforce express requirements for contract scoring metrics and qualifications for sub contractors, leading to PPL scoring significantly higher overall. It is very clear that a major scandal is being carried out at the expense of taxpayers. Even New York Democrats such as representative Richie Torres believe that there is quote something run in the state of New York under the management of Kathy Hochul. He is calling for a full investigation into the scandal, and the people of New York deserve answers.

@Sassafrass_84 — Sassafrass84

Posted - March 7, 2025 at 5:34 PM

Saved - March 7, 2025 at 11:19 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared my thoughts on the Department of Education's budget, which is $280 billion annually, with less than 25% actually spent on educating kids. I questioned where the remaining $220 billion goes, suggesting it funds bureaucracy and consultants, ultimately benefiting the Democrats. It feels like money laundering.

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

Harriet Hagerman on the Department of Education. Just listen. 👇 "The DOE has a budget of 280 billion dollars a year. Less than 25% goes to educating our children. (It shows too)" "So where does the other 220 billion go?" "It goes to bureaucracy. It goes to a consultant. It then goes back to the DEMOCRATS." It's money laundering. Period.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The DOGE program is definitely targeted at bureaucrats. Take the Department of Education, for example. They have a $280 billion budget annually, but less than 25% goes to educating students. The other $220 billion goes to bureaucracy, consultants who donate to Democrats, NGOs—it's money laundering at its finest. This happens in almost every agency. DOGE's brilliance isn't cutting spending directly, as he lacks that authority. Instead, he needs to create a report, going agency by agency, pinpointing programs we shouldn't fund, and attaching a specific dollar amount to them. We then add a preamble stating every agency's budget will be cut by X amount, as detailed in the report, and those programs are dead.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So is the DOGE program targeted at these bureaucrats? Yes. And so how what can you expect? Well, let's look at the Department of Education. The Federal Department of Education spends has a budget of about $280,000,000,000 a year. Less than 25% goes to educating our students. So where does the other $220,000,000,000 go? It goes to a bureaucracy. It goes to a consultant, and that consultant then donates money back to the Democrats. And then it goes to a different consultant and then it goes to an NGO and then it goes to, I mean, it is money laundering and money churning at its absolute best. And you can look at almost every single agency and you will find it. So the brilliance of Doge isn't that he's going in and cutting spending. He doesn't have the authority to do that. We're the ones that have the authority to do that. What I want him to do is come up with a report, go through agency by agency by agency, identify every single program that we should not be funding, put a number attached to it, we slap a preamble on the front of that report, and we say that every single agency is having their budget cut by X amount as shown in the attached report, and none of those programs can go forward from here on out.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 25, 2025 at 5:36 AM

Saved - May 26, 2025 at 12:56 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I was appointed to the Budget Committee and quickly uncovered that Governor Newsom's budget was not balanced, revealing a $10-12 billion deficit instead of the claimed surplus. I highlighted that the cost of providing healthcare to illegal immigrants was significantly higher than reported, with no federal reimbursements available. I also exposed a network of 73 NGOs receiving taxpayer money for left-wing initiatives under the guise of COVID-19 funding. After these revelations, I was removed from the committee, raising questions about accountability for these actions.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Rep Carl DeMaio was put on the Budget Committee. He brought up Gavin Newsom was illegally qualifying illegals for healthcare with federal reimbursements He was warned to keep it quiet He then discovered a 73 NGO Democrat money laundering operation He was removed “A pretty lengthy career that I've established in turning around financially troubled organizations, doing audits, doing fiscal and financial transparency reports, performance management. And I took all those skill sets and have been applying them to government at the federal, state and local level for the past 30 years. So when I was elected and I was appointed to the budget committee — So the first meeting I uncovered that the Newsom budget was not balanced. And Newsom said that in January that his budget was, quote, modestly balanced, it had a modest surplus. And I said, no, he's a liar. You have a $10- $12 billion deficit. That's what I was saying in January and here we are in May and Newsom admits that he has a $10- $12 billion dollars deficit - That same meeting I pinpointed what was driving our deficit in large part was the free health care handouts to illegal immigra at state taxpayer expense. And we blew the lid open on the financial crisis in Medi Cal program they're using to give out the free health care to illegal immigrants and that it wasn't costing $6 billion and reimbursing with reimbursements from the federal government. It's costing $10 billion. And there are no reimbursements from the federal government because these are ineligible recipients. You can't use federal funds for illegal immigrants for welfare under federal law. And so we expose that. Then in the next meeting I exposed, by the way, they warned me after that first meeting that I better shut up, that I better stop it better myself - So in the second meeting I went after their MONEY LAUNDERING. We identified contracts and grants that Newsom and Democrats have been using through the state budget with your state taxpayer money to fund far left wing groups. We came up with 73 NGO groups that are being funded with your taxpayer money through a COVID 19 project that COVID 19 is so far, you know, gone and done, but they're still having these COVID 19 programs with all this money being given out. And we went through these 73 organizations and they're all left wing lobbying groups, fringe political groups, your taxpayer money funding far left politics. And so at the end of that hearing, I was thrown off because Newsom and the Democrats they don't like it when you shine a light on their corruption and their wasteful spending. And so I knew, I knew that there would be retaliation.” With all this information and evidence, how are Democrats and Gavin Newsom not being raided and thrown in prison

Video Transcript AI Summary

After being appointed to the budget committee, the speaker uncovered that Newsom's January budget, claimed to be modestly balanced, actually had a $10-12 billion deficit. The speaker pinpointed that free healthcare handouts to illegal immigrants at state taxpayer expense were driving the deficit, costing $10 billion with no federal reimbursements, contrary to claims of $6 billion with reimbursements. After being warned to be quiet, the speaker exposed money laundering in the second meeting, identifying contracts and grants used to fund 73 far-left wing groups through COVID-19 projects. Following this, the speaker was removed from the budget committee. Since then, the speaker has been running a "Doge California" program, uncovering billions in wasteful spending and posting clips to social media.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: A pretty lengthy career that I've established in turning around financially troubled organizations, doing audits, doing fiscal and financial transparency reports, performance management. And I took all those skill sets and have been applying them to government at the federal, state, and local level for the past thirty years. So when I was elected and I was appointed to the budget committee, I said, okay. This is great. I'm gonna be able to use my skills. And, you know, boy, they they really they really made a thoughtful appointment here. Well, I don't think they actually did their due diligence and and research because my I I only made it on the budget committee for two meetings. So the first meeting, I uncovered that the Newsom budget was not balanced. And Newsom said that in January that his budget was, quote, modestly balanced. Balanced. It had a modest surplus. And I said, no. He's a liar. You have a a 10 to $1,112,000,000,000 dollar deficit. That's what I was saying in in January, and here we are in May, and Newsom admits that he has a 10 to $12,000,000,000 deficit. That same meeting, I pinpointed what was driving our deficit in large part was the free health care handouts to illegal immigrants at state taxpayer expense. And we blew the lid open on the financial crisis in Medi Cal program they're using to give out free health care to illegal immigrants and that it wasn't costing $6,000,000,000 and reimbursing with reimbursements from the federal government. It's costing $10,000,000,000, and there are no reimbursements from the federal government because these are ineligible recipients. And you can't use federal funds for illegal immigrants for welfare under federal law. And so we exposed that. Then in the next meeting, I exposed by the way, they warned me after that first meeting that I better shut up. That I I better stop it, better behave myself. And I said, okay. Well, yeah, I I I might pick a finger. So in the second meeting, I went after their money laundering, and we identified contracts and grants that Newsom and Democrats have been using through the state budget with your state taxpayer money to fund the far left wing groups. We came up with 73 NGO groups that are being fund with your taxpayer money through a COVID nineteen project that COVID nineteen is so far, you know, gone and done, but they're still having these COVID nineteen programs with all this money being given out. And we went through these 73 organizations, and they're all left wing lobbying groups, fringe political groups, your taxpayer money funding far left politics. And so at the end of that hearing, I was thrown off because Newsom and the Democrats, they don't like it when you shine a light on their corruption and their wasteful spending. And so I knew I knew that there would be retaliation. But don't worry. I don't need to be on the budget committee to doge California, and that's what we've been doing out of my office for the past five months since I took the oath, is we've been doing a Doge California program, and we've been uncovering, again, billions and billions in wasteful spending. And we've been posting the clips to my, social media accounts, and the the word is getting out there. We are shining a light on their grift.

@DataRepublican — DataRepublican (small r)

Posted - June 7, 2025 at 4:14 PM

Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:02 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Karen Bass, known as the Mayor of Los Angeles, has a complex background that goes beyond her current role. She served as Vice Chair of the National Endowment for Democracy, involved in controversial foreign interventions. Her political career began early, with significant ties to activist groups and government grants. Despite a scholarship scandal similar to one that led to an indictment for a colleague, she faced no repercussions. Bass's activism has persisted through her time in Congress, where she was deeply engaged in global issues, often prioritizing them over local concerns, as evidenced by her handling of the recent wildfire crisis.