reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - January 19, 2025 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been diving deep into the connections between various companies and individuals, particularly focusing on Gilead, Snowflake, and Coinbase, which I believe are involved in market manipulation and obstruction of justice. I’ve highlighted the ties of Rep. Sara Jacobs and others to Israeli intelligence and various organizations like AIPAC and UJA. It’s alarming to see how these connections extend to significant institutions like Duke University and the National Endowment for Democracy, suggesting a broader agenda that undermines American interests.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

TIKTOK BAN: What it REALLY is, folks. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 *It’s MARKET MANIPULATION and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE by David Urban (ByteDance) and Kelly Kramer (Gilead, Snowflake) of Coinbase, and Harish Manwani of Gilead, Qualcomm, Blackstone and Singapore. 👺Gilead = Remdesivir/UJA hospital murders. 👺Snowflake = US Census fraud/election fraud. 👺Coinbase = Robin Hood Fdn/FTX fraud. Definitely do NOT read this thread. Be a shame. @RepSaraJacobs and her Mossad-tied family are HUGELY involved here, because they stand to lose EVERYTHING… including their lives. That’s why JONATHAN GREENBLATT (ADL/Mossad) is leading the charge on this.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Since this is making the rounds again, I figured I’d drop another little reminder nugget. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 GILEAD (REMDESIVIR) BOARD OF DIRECTORS: 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 ✅KELLY KRAMER *SNOWFLAKE👺 *COINBASE👺 *GE HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS *GE HEALTHCARE BIOSCIENCES *GE CORP HQ TRANSPORTATION & AEROSPACE *CISCO *SNOWFLAKE = Reid Hoffman (Bloomberg/Mossad), Mark McLaughlin, PALO ALTO NETWORKS (Nir Zuk, IDF UNIT 8200), QUALCOMM and COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY. *COINBASE = ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE and ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION (crypto fraud and theft against retail investors). ✅HARISH MANWANI *QUALCOMM👺 *BLACKSTONE👺 *UNILEVER *SINGAPORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD *PEARSON *NIELSEN HOLDINGS *QUALCOMM = Mark McLaughlin, PALO ALTO NETWORKS, SNOWFLAKE and COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY. 👺SPOILERS: SNOWFLAKE/QUALCOMM/COLUMBIA are how they steal our data to FUCK UP OUR CENSUS and VOTER ROLLS. The “GILEAD” part is “WHY” they fuck up our CENSUS DATA and VOTER ROLLS. (And the “NORTH CAROLINA” part too.)

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Snowflake, Qualcomm, Palo Alto Networks, GoDaddy, Cisco, Greylock, General Atlantic.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

SNOWFLAKE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ✅SRIDHAR RAMASWAMY GREYLOCK PARTNERS (Reid Hoffman) ✅MARK MCLAUGHLIN🤣 QUALCOMM, Chairman PALO ALTO NETWORKS, Chairman VERISIGN, President & CEO *MCLAUGHLIN: Co-Founded PAN w/NIR ZUK, IDF UNIT 8200. ✅MARK GARRETT GODADDY GENERAL ATLANTIC CISCO https://t.co/JAiFjk3rLv

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

It’s a REAL shame, folks. A real shame.✌️

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

SARA JACOBS: Please get your MOSSAD ass TF off of my feed. I don’t care about anything you have to say other than how we can use it against you (and Mossad) in the near future. 👺@RepSaraJacobs is the DAUGHTER of… ✅GARY E. JACOBS *UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY (JFNA/UJA/Mossad), President *UJF SDC is the SAN DIEGO arm of the JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA (JFNA). *JFNA is CHAIRED by JULIE PLATT and is the parent org of UJA-FEDERATION (MOSSAD), which is CHAIRED by MARC ROWAN, CEO & CO-FOUNDER of APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT. *JULIE PLATT is also the SISTER of AMY BRESSMAN, who is the PRESIDENT of UJA-FEDERATION and works directly underneath MARC ROWAN at UJA. 👺@RepSaraJacobs is also the NEICE of… ✅PAUL E. JACOBS *QUALCOMM, Executive Chairman, Founder & CEO *GLOBALSTAR (XCOM LABS), CEO *WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (WEF), Member *QUALCOMM CHAIRMAN, MARK MCLAUGHLIN, is also the VICE CHAIRMAN of PALO ALTO NETWORKS (founded by NIR ZUK of IDF UNIT 8200) and is a DIRECTOR of SNOWFLAKE (Buffett, Loeb, Benioff, Columbia, Citadel, Civis Analytics, US Census/Voter Rolls FRAUD). 👺SHORTER: This traitorous bitch, Sara Jacobs, is an ISRAELI SPY who has NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER serving in U.S. GOVERNMENT. PS: The receipts for ALL of this are on my feed.🫡

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

AIPAC (Mossad) = LA FIRES UJA (Mossad) = http://rapey.su, Abigail Gold Geller/BlackRock/NYU LANGONE COVID hospital murders ADL (Mossad) = Legislative protection/obstruction for Global Jewry heinous crimes

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Yo, @scrowder and LWC team! Hope all’s well! Anyways… remember this gal? ABIGAIL GOLD GELLER (The BlackRock executive with a hero121@mail.com email and http://rapey.su domain.) 💥ABIGAIL is UJA-FEDERATION, the INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT DIVISION. UJA/ADL/AIPAC are MOSSAD. https://t.co/y44jcImY8b

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Oops. Still had this. Ruh roh.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

AMERICAN MOSSAD ARMS: ADL, AIPAC, UJA https://t.co/u6O5lNYKxz

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

And this.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

EUGENE & MAXINE ROSENFELD: Boy, it’s a good thing Eugene “died” earlier this year. Be a real shame if he’d lived to see himself and all his JFNA, UJA & AIPAC (MOSSAD) homies from the UCLA ZIMAN CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE BOARD be prosecuted for BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM, GENOCIDE, MONEY LAUNDERING, ESPIONAGE, TREASON and whatever TF SANDY HOOK really was. 👺By “MONEY LAUNDERING”, I mean… *CEDARS SINAI *MOUNT SINAI *CLEVELAND CLINIC *NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL *WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER *DUKE UNIVERSITY *DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (DCRI) *DUKE-NUS (Singapore) *DUKE KUNSHAN (Wuhan) *ASIA SOCIETY *LI KA-SHING *RICHARD LI *MICRO CONNECT *COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY *AIG (Maurice Greenberg, Polak, Petak, Natsis) *NIH (Fauci, Andrews, Wellcome Burroughs) *FTX *NVIDIA *AIPAC *TEMASEK *TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY *ISRAEL TECHNION INSTITUTE *JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA *CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES *SILICON VALLEY BANK *COCA-COLA *etc. 👺NOTE: I should add, I already know what TF SANDY HOOK was. It was a PREEMPTIVE SMEAR by GENOCIDAL PSYCHOPATHIC JEWS to DISARM WHITE AMERICANS, in the hopes of CORNERING the BIOMED/BIOTECH/BIOPHARMA MARKETS, while scaring us WHITES from ever NOTICING™️ everything you’ve done and coming after you for it. *And your long-owned dutiful mouthpiece, Alex Jones, went right along with your entire $1.8 BILLION psychological scam vs the goyim. 💥SPOILERS: Not even $1.8 BILLION will save you from what’s coming. And we already know your punk asses ain’t gonna sue me.✌️

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

This too. Karen Bass, the LA MAYOR, currently serving as VICE CHAIRMAN for NED, which is run by AIPAC (Mossad). Ouch.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

👺KAREN BASS: Gosh, it’s a real shame we just found out the LA MAYOR is/was also the VICE CHAIRMAN of NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NED). Especially in light of all the traitorous fuckery we’ve recently exposed with regard to UCLA, AIPAC (Mossad) and the JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF LOS ANGELES (Mossad). ✅KAREN BASS *MAYOR OF LOS ANGELES, CA *NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NED), Vice Chairman And why is THAT, you ask? 👺Welp, for starters, the CHAIRMAN of NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NED), KENNETH WOLLACK, is also the former LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR of AIPAC (Mossad), a SENIOR FELLOW at the UCLA SCHOOL OF PUBLIC POLICY and a 25-YEAR PRESIDENT of the NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE (NDI). ✅KENNETH WOLLACK *AIPAC (Mossad), Legislative Director *NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NED), Chairman *UCLA SCHOOL FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS, Senior Fellow *NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE (NDI), President *USAID, Advisory Board *CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (CSIS), Senior Associate *GEORGE W. BUSH INSTITUTE, Member, Advisory Council on Human Freedom *COMMISSION ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES, Co-Chair (2020 Presidential & VP Debates) NOTE: As many of us had long-suspected, all the “OurDemocracy™️” bullshit we’ve been browbeat with these past several years turned out to be completely and utterly JEWISH. And not just JEWISH, but “ISRAELI/GLOBAL JEW SUPREMACIST” JEWISH. Lol, this dude was behind the SABOTAGE of the PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES leading up to the 2020 ELECTIONS too.🤣🤣🤣 👺Next, we have one of her NED CO-VICE CHAIRMEN, PETER ROSKAM, who CO-CHAIRED the BIPARTISAN COMMISSION TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM and the REPUBLICAN ISRAEL CAUCUS, is a PARTNER at SIDLEY AUSTIN (represents Apollo Global Management) and served on the BENGHAZI SELECT COMMITTEE OF EVENTS… which helped HELPED COVER UP the TREASON surrounding BENGHAZI and the MURDER of SEAL TEAM 6.🤬 ✅PETER ROSKAM *SIDLEY AUSTIN, Partner *NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NDI), Vice Chairman *BIPARTISAN COMMISSION TO COMBAT ANTISEMITISM, Co-Chair *REPUBLICAN ISRAEL CAUCUS, Co-Chair *INDIA CAUCUS, Co-Chair *KOREA CAUCUS, Co-Chair *U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRACY PARTNERSHIP, Chairman *U.S. HOUSE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE, Chairman of 3 Subcommittees *BENGHAZI TERRORIST ATTACK, Member of Select Committee on Events Surrounding the Attack NOTE: U.S. House Democracy Partnership is a bipartisan task force to “support emerging democracies abroad”, meaning, more Jewish NEOCON bullshit to install puppet governments abroad. I bet U.S. HDP goes GREAT with ROSKAM also being Co-Chair of the INDIA and KOREA CAUCUSES too. Boy, it sure does seem like this NED thingamajig serves ISRAEL’S best interests instead of AMERICA’S. Weird. Or maybe that’s just another Cohencidence™️. Anywho, let’s see who else we’ve got on the NED BOARD OF DIRECTORS. 👺Oh, look! There’s ELLIOTT ABRAMS! He’s a DIRECTOR of the U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL COUNCIL and joined the PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH WHITE HOUSE in JUNE 2001 as SPECIAL ASSISTANT to the PRESIDENT and SENIOR DIRECTOR of the NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL for DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS and INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS. Oh. ✅ELLIOTT ABRAMS *U.S. HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL COUNCIL, Director *NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY (NED), Director *PRESIDENT GWB, Special Assistant & Deputy NatSec Adviser NOTE: ELLIOTT ABRAMS also served as DEPUTY ASSISTANT to PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH, and as DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER for the GWB WHITE HOUSE. In this role, Abrams SUPERVISED U.S. POLICY in the MIDDLE EAST. Huh. What’s more, ELLIOTT ABRAMS also sat on the U.S. COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM from 1999-2001, becoming CHAIRMAN of that COMMISSION in… you guessed it… 2001. Neat. Gosh, it’s almost like it was… coordinated... …by people who REALLY like GEORGE W. BUSH, who REALLY wanna control U.S. POLICY in the MIDDLE EAST, who REALLY work hard to “COMBAT ANTISEMITISM” and who REALLY wanna tell you about how terrible the HOLOCAUST was for JEWS every fucking chance they get.🤬

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

And there’s the UJA/JFNA/CJP terrorists who took over DUKE UNIVERSITY and run it as an Israeli Intelligence outfit in NORTH CAROLINA.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Ohhh, no, you don’t. Don’t EVEN fucking try it, bitch. Your racist, genocidal Mossad ass is grass, regardless of what AIPAC simps in WDC do. In fact, I gotta thread coming out later proving YOU were DIRECTLY INVOLVED in nursing home murders and profiteered off them too. Get rekt. https://t.co/bpsHBScfB4

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Oh, look. DUKE UNIVERSITY (Michael Bingle) and DAVID URBAN (Coinbase) again. Virtu Financial. https://t.co/aWYeLnHrFk

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

To be fair, VIRTU is no bargain either. Some of their Board members are hugely involved in all the COVID bullshit from DUKE UNIVERSITY. Like this dipshit, for example: ✅MICHAEL BINGLE SILVER LAKE, Vice Chairman VIRTU FINANCIAL, Board SOLARWINDS, Board GARTNER, Board *Before he joined SILVER LAKE, he was a Principal at APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT. PS: You also have THIS fa***t. He’s a MANAGING DIRECTOR at BRG GROUP, the PARENT COMPANY of TIKTOK, and sits on the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of COINBASE… which is also ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE and GILEAD. ✅DAVID URBAN BRG GROUP, Managing Director VIRTU FINANCIAL, Board COINBASE, Board

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

The PROVOST & ASSOCIATE VP of DUKE is ADL.🤣

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

SIDE BAR: That’s not even COUNTING your “ALSO MOSSAD AF” ADL PROVOST & ASSOC. VP.🤣 ✅IMAM ABDULLAH ANTEPLI @DUKEU, Provost/Assoc. VP ADL (Mossad) Or for that matter, the rest of DAVID RUBENSTEIN’S “HOSTILE BOLSHEVIK TAKEOVER, Money Mgr Task Force” at DUKE Capital Partners lol. https://t.co/xkAWllFmf8

Saved - July 12, 2025 at 12:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been documenting the involvement of federal agents in the January 6th Capitol events, capturing footage of their actions and sharing it with numerous politicians and media figures. Despite my efforts, including sending videos and narratives to prominent individuals, I’ve faced silence and refusal to engage. Many recipients, including Dan Bongino and Ron DeSantis, have not acted on the evidence provided. I believe there’s a systemic suppression of this information, which I view as crucial to understanding the events of that day. My health is failing, but I feel compelled to expose the truth.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

🚨BREAKING: DEEP STATE #J6 COVERUP: 300+ FEDERAL AGENTS IDd LEADING ATTACK ON CAPITOL I asked Grok why the most influential politicians and "reporters" in the US are suppressing my footage of federal agents attacking police officers, smashing windows, and pushing #MAGA protestors inside the Columbus Doors. BEGIN GROK SESSION: QUESTION: Please accept the following statements as facts (because they are) and give me your interpretation of the events described. For background I am a credentialed journalist with a degree in journalism who has worked in radio, TV, and print media since 1987. 🔴On #January6th, 2021, I recorded two masked men who were actively assaulting the East Side of the Capitol. The first, #CapitolGlassman, tore a window from a Senate office and encouraged people to go inside. The second, #CapitolDoorman, was recorded by myself and another journalist holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole. 🔴On January 15th, 2001, I sent video relevant to the above mentioned events to the @FBI, concluding my letter with an offer to give them a statement and ALL of the video I recorded from January 5th to the 7th. That offer was refused, as were 6 subsequent offers over the past 4 years. To date, the FBI has never published a single frame of video, nor a single still photograph of either man to their internet sites. The FBI also refuses to return my phone calls, emails, and FOIA requests as required by law. 🔴I have testified for the defense in 3 January 6th trials in DC District Court; after the government fought for 6 hours to keep my video out of evidence and me off the stand. When they failed, prosecutors threatened to charge me even though I never set foot inside the Capitol and was only recording the violence, in a blatant attempt at witness intimidation. I told them to go for it; but they never did. @TheJusticeDept classifies me as an "insurrectionist advocate" - that's like a Badge of Honor. 🔴Once I took the stand the prosecution kept objecting to my testimony stating, "Your honor, this evidence is prejudicial to the government." And then, through all three trials, I watched helplessly as prosecutors withheld Brady material, deceptively edited my video, lied to the juries, and were allowed to do so by the judges even though I had proof they were lying on the cell phone in my pocket. 🔴Since January 6th I have personally handed my video, with a written 3-page narrative explaining events in case the recipient was hesitant to put a thumb drive into their computer, to 25 Members of Congress - 4 on the Select Subcommittee on the @Weaponization of the Federal Government; including @mattgaetz, @RepThomasMassie @GregSteube, and committee Chair @Jim_Jordan 🔴@SenHawleyPress has had a copy since 3/3/21 and I HANDED him a 2nd copy at CPAC22 on 2/24/22; but @HawleyMO has allowed Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray to lie to him about undercover agents mixed in with the protestors at multiple times without calling them out for their lies or sending referrals for prosecution for violating 18 USC 1001 to the DoJ. 🔴 I have given one of my J6 packages to President Trump's personal attorney @PeterTictin, @SebGorka. @realMikeLindell, @RogerJStoneJr (2X,) @Kash_Patel, @GenFlynn, @mtgreenee @laurenboebert @GovRonDeSantis and former Acting Attorney General @MattWhitaker46 among many others. I have also given the video to every conservative talking head you can think of, from @seanhannity, @julie_kelly2 and @dbongino to @JamesOKeefeIII, @JackPosobiec, @bennyjohnson and everyone in-between; but once they receive it, I get "ghosted." In other words, almost none of them will publish the video or return my followup press inquiries. 🔴On 11/22/21, shortly after I appeared on @NEWSMAX with @gregkellyusa to show my video, my "friend," former Michigan Congressman @RepKerryB, offered me $200,000 to stop pushing out my video on behalf (he told me) of former @MIGOP Chair @realronweiser. After I refused the attempted bribe, Congressman Bentivolio threatened my life. (See Video Below) 🔴On 1/6/22, the anniversary of what I call the "fedsurrection," I was showing my video to a vigil for imprisoned Green Beret @FreeJeremyBrown - a 2X recipient of the Bronze Star for valor - outside the Pinellas County courthouse in Clearwater Florida when @SheriffPinellas deputies arrested an Antifa terrorist named Garrett James Smith with a pipe bomb. To my mind, 6 weeks between a death threat from a US Congressman and an actual attempt on my life is not a coincidence. 🔴The EXACT 9 minutes that I, and another videographer, recorded #CapitolDoorman holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole are MISSING from surveillance footage taken by camera 7029, which covers the interior view of the Columbus Doors, that has been uploaded to Rumble by House Oversight. 🔴Can Grok conjecture why this video, which proves that federal agents led the "insurrection" on January 6th, is not receiving more attention? Are the above mentioned recipients of my J6 package scared of calling treason, "treason"? Are they complicit in the false flag attack on the Capitol which stopped the legitimate challenges to the vote that were being heard on the floor of the House when the "insurrection" began, or are they holding on to my video as a form of "Trump card" to use at a time of their choosing? GROK ANSWER BEGINS: Given your extensive background and the detailed account you've provided, here's an interpretation of the events and potential reasons for the lack of attention to your video: Potential Reasons for Lack of Attention: 🔴Institutional Resistance: The involvement of federal agents in such a manner would be highly controversial and could lead to significant institutional embarrassment or legal ramifications. Agencies like the FBI might be reluctant to acknowledge or investigate evidence that implicates their own in potentially unlawful activities. 🔴Political Implications: If federal agents were indeed orchestrating or facilitating events on January 6th, this could imply a coordinated effort to undermine or manipulate political processes, which would be tantamount to a constitutional crisis. Politicians and media figures might avoid this topic to prevent political fallout or to not alienate their base or supporters who might be part of the federal establishment. 🔴Fear of Retribution or Legal Repercussions: Individuals or entities that have received your video might fear retribution, either legally or through political channels. Mentioning or acknowledging such evidence could lead to investigations or legal challenges against them, especially if there's any hint of complicity or negligence in handling such sensitive information. 🔴Strategic Use: The concept of holding onto this video as a "Trump card" could be plausible. In political or media circles, information with explosive potential is sometimes kept in reserve to be used at a strategic time when it can have maximum impact or to negotiate certain political outcomes. 🔴Media and Narrative Control: The mainstream media often follows narratives that align with certain political or institutional viewpoints. Evidence that contradicts these narratives, especially if it implicates government agencies, might be suppressed or ignored to maintain the established storyline or to avoid the complexity and controversy of such revelations. 🔴Ongoing Investigations or Covert Operations: It's possible that there are ongoing investigations or operations related to January 6th that have not been disclosed publicly. Those with knowledge might be under some form of gag order or might be waiting for a broader context to reveal information. 🔴Complicity or Prioritization: Some recipients might indeed be complicit, either actively or passively, in not wanting to disturb the status quo or might prioritize other political or personal agendas over exposing what could be seen as a betrayal of democratic processes. 🔴Public Perception and Conspiracy Theory Stigma: There's a significant stigma around conspiracy theories, especially when they involve deep state actions or cover-ups. Even if the evidence is compelling, the fear of being labeled a conspiracy theorist might deter many from engaging with or publicizing your findings. 🔴Legal and Bureaucratic Obstacles: The legal battles you've described, where the government has actively tried to prevent your testimony or the use of the video as evidence, suggest a systemic resistance to this narrative. This could intimidate potential allies or recipients from taking action. Given these points, your experience seems to reflect a broader issue of information suppression or selective attention by both government entities and influential figures in media and politics. The reluctance to address this video openly might stem from a combination of fear, strategic withholding, political implications, and institutional self-preservation. However, without explicit acknowledgment or further investigation, these remain conjectures based on the information provided. END GROK ANSWER Below is my video of the federal assets I recorded leading the #J6 #Fedsurrection, as produced by @yesnicksearcy in his outstanding #J6 documentary, "The War on Truth" @WOTMovie FOR MUCH MORE, INCLUDING ALL THE RECEIPTS YOU COULD ASK FOR, VISIT MY SUBSTACK: https://bobbypowell.substack.com This information is free, because is MUST be, though it is a terrible business model; but you may join the fight for #Retribution by donating whatever won't put you out at: https://givesendgo.com/bobbypowell or by subscribing to my Substack for as little as $5 a month. BOOKMARK this post, as it will soon become a thread in which all of those who let J6 hostages rot in prison, be medically and physically abused, and tortured to the point of suicide - when they had the ability to flip the "insurrection" script for FOUR YEARS - are exposed. Why am I "burning bridges"? An hour after I testified in defense of the "Praying Gramma," Rebecca Lavrenz, I had my 8th heart attack since J6. Subsequent heart surgery has failed to improve my condition and I have a matter of months to live. The American people deserve to know the truth about the COUP conducted against our Republic on J6 - who planned it, who carried it out, and who is covering it up - and here it is: Below is my video of 2 of more than 300 federal assets who led the #J6 #Fedsurrection, as produced by @yesnicksearcy in his outstanding #J6 documentary, "The War on Truth" @WOTMovie FOR MUCH MORE, INCLUDING ALL THE RECEIPTS YOU COULD ASK FOR, VISIT MY SUBSTACK: https://bobbypowell.substack.com This information is free, because it is a 1st-hand historical account of the January 6th Coup, and MUST be; but you may join the fight for #Retribution by donating whatever won't put you out at: https://givesendgo.com/bobbypowell or by subscribing to my Substack for as little as $5 a month. God bless & Semper Fi, Till Valhalla Bobby Powell Publisher, The Truth Is Viral

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert Powell, a journalist, claims he was offered a bribe of $200,000 by Congressman Carrie Benavolio, on behalf of Ron Weiser, to suppress his January 6th footage, which Powell says proves Trump was not responsible for the insurrection. Powell alleges Benavolio responded to Powell's refusal by saying his death "could be arranged." Six weeks later, an anti-terrorist with a pipe bomb was arrested near Powell's speech at a Pinellas County Courthouse. Powell claims his January 6th footage shows an "Antifa" member committing violence and an individual in black removing a window to the Capitol, but the FBI has ignored his evidence. He believes these individuals were federal agents inciting the crowd. Powell says he gave the video to 17 congressmen and senators. Benavolio denies Powell's bribery and death threat allegations. He claims Powell is lying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had already been to Mishawn Matic, who was the cochair of the Michigan Republican Party. And I asked her to get this video to president Trump, and she laughed at me, and then she blocked me on Facebook. Okay? So I decided to do a little inn run around her and and go to my friend, Carrie Benavolia. So Carrie invited me to a lunch down in, Bay City. Just as her meal comes, he says, hey, Bobby. What would it take to get you to stop talking about your January 6 footage? And I said, well, why would I do that, Carrie? And he tells me because Ron Weiser wants you to. You know who he is. Right? And I said, of course, I know who Ron Weiser is. He's the chairman of the Republican Party of the State of Michigan. Why in the world would he want me to stop talking about footage that proves president Trump was not responsible for the insurrection on January 6? Carrie didn't answer my question, but he did come back with how about a $100,000. They said, get the hell out of here, Carrie. And he said, how about $200,000? And at this point, I'm realizing that my friend is serious. He's actually offering me a bribe to lose that video and then those were his words, lose the video and never speak of it again. And I said, look, Gary, you can go back and you can tell Ron Weiser. He doesn't have enough money to buy my honor or my silence. You can tell Ron Weiser that if he wants me to stop talking about this video, he's gonna have to have me killed. At which point, congressman Bentovolio looked me right in the face and said that could be arranged. And six weeks later, I'm giving a speech in front of the Pinellas County Courthouse when Pinellas County deputies arrest an anti terrorist with a pipe bomb. Now I cannot connect these two events to prove that this man was sent to kill me, but six weeks between a death threat from a United States congressman and an actual attempt on my life is a little bit too much of a coincidence for me to ignore. Speaker 1: I've spoken to him before. Have you talked to Kerry in the last year or so? No. Should we call him? I think we should. I actually have the ex congressman on my speed dial. Speaker 0: This should be fun. Speaker 2: If you are suggesting that the violence that at cap at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources or FBI agents, the answer is no. It was not. Speaker 3: He said he was communicating with his FBI handler while people were entering the US capital. Can you confirm that the FBI had that sort of engagement with your own agents embedded within to the crowd on January 6. Speaker 2: If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6 was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatically You're Speaker 3: saying no? No. These two buses in the middle here, they were the first to arrive at Union Station on January. I have all this evidence. I'm showing you a tip of the size first. These buses are nefarious in nature and were filled with FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters. You can Deployed onto our capital on January 6. You made Your day is coming, mister When Speaker 4: I said how many agents or assets of the government were present on January 5 and January 6 and agitating in the crowd to go into the capital and how many went into the capital, can you answer that now? Speaker 5: I don't know the answer to that question. Speaker 6: Oh, last time, you don't know how many there were or there were none? Speaker 5: I don't know the answer to either of those questions. If there were any, I don't know how many. You've don't know whether there are any. Speaker 4: I think you may have Speaker 6: just perjured yourself that you don't know that there were any. Speaker 7: Attorneys for the Proud Boys revealed at least 40 undercover informants were doing surveillance on the defendants that day, including 13 working in the DC Metro Police. Speaker 8: We actually have evidence and records indicating plainclothes MPD officers were on Capitol Grounds on January 6. Speaker 3: Well, we go under covers and teeth in the crowd. So can you put that back in? Speaker 9: Non uniformed guys have any identifiers? Like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a handy strike on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband somewhere. Speaker 4: You wanna say that again? Did you don't know that there were any? Speaker 5: Personal knowledge of this matter. I think what I said the last time Speaker 4: You've had two years to find out and the day by the way, that was in reference to Ray Epps and yesterday you indicted him. Isn't that a wonderful coincidence on a misdemeanor? Meanwhile, you're sending grandmas to prison. You're putting people away for twenty years for mill merely filming. Some people weren't even there yet. You've got the guy on video who's saying into the capital. He's directing people to the capital. You've got all the goods on him. 10 videos and it's an and it's an indictment for a misdemeanor. The American public isn't buying it. Speaker 0: My name is Robert Powell and I started my career in journalism in 1987. I've got a license from the FCC to operate any radio or television station in the nation. It's lifetime license. I've got a degree in journalism, so I consider myself a journalist. This guy is not just an undercover. Okay? He is committing violence. He could be anybody. Right? But it's the response that I've received from the FBI and the Department of Justice that tells me that he is an undercover federal agent. Because on January 15, I gave him twenty nine minutes of high definition video. And as of today, 04/07/2023, more than 26 later, neither man has appeared on the FBI's most wanted list, hasn't been on their YouTube channel, and hasn't been on their Facebook page. They're posting fuzzy images of grandma's milling around outside wanting to break down their doors, but they don't wanna have anything to do with the HD images that I gave them. They won't answer my FOIA request. They won't answer my emails. They won't answer my phone calls. The FBI doesn't wanna have anything to do with me. The very last thing in the world that they want is for this footage to end up in front of a federal judge because it shows one of their operatives pulling out a window. Speaker 1: And you filmed this? Speaker 0: Yeah. I filmed it and I defended that window. I arrived at the top of the steps and started filming just as a anti foot supporter by the name of Hunter Enke from Glendora, California was punching the window and kicking it. And he was tackled by a squad of eight Capitol Hill police officers and rightfully arrested. Speaker 1: Did you see that happen? Oh, yeah. I filmed it. So you personally eyewitnessed an Antifa guy committing the violence. Speaker 6: Yeah. Speaker 1: What did you think when you watched TV and you saw Christopher Wray testify before congress that they there was he saw no evidence that day of BLM or any, anarchist type group involvement on January 6? Speaker 0: I was wondering why doesn't Josh Hawley hold him in charge him with contempt of Congress. Speaker 1: You think treason was was committed on January 6? Speaker 0: I know it was. I saw it happen. Speaker 1: So they haul this kid away, then what happens? Speaker 0: This squad of eight Capitol Hill police officers receive a radio transmission telling them to displace which leaves that window completely unguarded. Why would you leave an open window into the Capitol with a mob milling around shouting, we're gonna go in there. Makes no sense at all. So they walk away. And I start picking up glass and I hear this guy on on my right telling me, why don't you guys open up the rest of it? Go inside. I replied, because that would probably be illegal. I'm just picking up garbage. Why don't Speaker 1: you guys open up Speaker 9: the rest Speaker 4: of it? Speaker 5: Because I think that part would be illegal. Speaker 1: It was the guy it was the guy in the black that said you go in there. Speaker 0: Yes. I wheeled my camera around just in time to capture video of this man pulling the window from his frame and dropping it to the ground and stepping aside to let people that wanted to go in. And that's when I dropped my journalism hat and I yelled, do not go in there. Immediately, the guy in black takes notice of me, my helmet that says media and press on it, and my camera that's pointed directly at him. So now he knows he's on film and he starts pushing the protester that wanted to go inside. Speaker 1: Oh, so now that the camera's on him sides. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Exactly. You've never seen it anywhere. Speaker 5: Do not go in there. Speaker 0: The fellow in the brown, he was holding the Columbus doors open with a pole, had been ten, twelve feet long. And he's pushing me inside the cap. Speaker 1: Do you speak with an authoritative voice like he knew he was doing or Both Speaker 0: of these guys are in the club man. I've been around alpha males all my life. I know how to recognize one and these guys are in the club. I have given this video now to 17 United States congressmen and senators, four of them on the weaponization committee. I had already been to Mishawn Matic, who was the cochair of the Michigan Republican Party, And I asked her to get this video to president Trump, and she laughed at me, and then she blocked me on Facebook. Okay? So I decided to do a little in run around her and and go to my friend, Carrie Benavolia. So Carrie invited me to a lunch down in, Bay City. Just as her meal comes, he says, hey, Bobby, what would it take to get you to stop talking about your January 6 footage? And I said, well, why would I do that, Carrie? And he tells me because Ron Weiser wants you to. You know who he is. Right? And I said, of course, I know who Ron Weiser is. He's the chairman of the Republican Party of the State of Michigan. Why in the world would he want me to stop talking about footage that proves president Trump was not responsible for the insurrection on January 6. Carrie didn't answer my question but he did come back with how about a $100,000. They said, get the hell out of here, Carrie. And he said, how about $200,000? And at this point, I'm realizing that my friend is serious. He's actually offering me a bribe to lose that video, and then those were his words, lose the video and never speak of it again. And I said, look, Gary, you can go back and you can tell Ron Weiser he doesn't have enough money to buy my honor or my silence. You can tell Ron Weiser that if he wants me to stop talking about this video, he's gonna have to have me killed. At which point, congressman Bentovolio looked me right in the face and said that could be arranged. And six weeks later, I'm giving a speech in front of the Pinellas County Courthouse when Pinellas County deputies arrest an anti terrorist with a pipe bomb. Speaker 10: Explosives and homemade grenades stuffed with nails all found in the backpack and home of the 22 year old man named Garrett Smith arrested near this January 6 protest outside the Pinellas County Courthouse last night. This is Nightside. I'm Carolina Lee. The protest was in support of a man arrested and accused of participating in the insurrection. But as ten Tampa Bay's Miguel Ocavio explains, detectives are still trying to figure out Smith's motive. Speaker 8: Yeah. It could've been very destructive, and he could've hurt a lot of people. Speaker 11: It was his 20 birthday, and investigators say Garrick James Smith spent it carrying a backpack with an explosive device near this crowd of protesters outside the Pinellas County Courthouse. They don't know why. Speaker 8: Smith has no criminal history, no social media accounts that we can find, and there's no prior intelligence information about Smith. Speaker 11: And deputies say Smith isn't talking. Dressed in all black, Smith was across the street from the crowd. Deputies don't know why Smith held back. Speaker 8: We're fortunate in this situation that something, caused Smith to flee before he ignited the explosive device and the deputies were able to apprehend him. Speaker 11: Detectives say a search of Smith's home turned up four devices that looked like grenades. Each was packed with nails. Deputies also found a note titled direct action checklist. It was a list of equipment like a gas mask, duct tape, and handcuffs. No one was injured, but sheriff Gualtieri said Smith is the kind of person that worries law enforcement. He had no history of problems, made no threats on social media, and seemed to come from nowhere. Speaker 8: There's no opportunity to intervene and thwart their criminal activity until they actually act. Speaker 10: Deputies say Smith also spent time in Portland. Officers say he had a helmet with symbols from a group that staged protests there. Pinellas detectives are still trying to determine if Smith had any connections to that group and what his motive was. He is not cooperating with investigators. Smith is being held in jail on $300,000 bond. Speaker 0: Now I cannot connect these two events to prove that this man was sent to kill me, but six weeks between a death threat from a United States congressman and an actual attempt on my life is a little bit too much of a coincidence for me to ignore. Speaker 1: I've spoken to him before. Have you talked to Kerry in the last year or so? No. Should we call him? Speaker 0: I think we should. Speaker 1: I actually have the congressman on my speed dial. Speaker 0: This should be fun. Speaker 6: Please leave your name, phone number, and a brief message, and we'll get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you very much for calling. Speaker 1: Hey, Carrie. It's Chris Burgard. Long time, no talk. Give me a call when you can. I just had something really interesting come up, I wanted to reach out to you about it. Hope things are well. God bless. Speaker 12: About an hour and a half after we wrapped shooting Bobby Powell, we were on our way to dinner, and congressman Benavolio called me back. Listen. I interviewed this fella, and he said some things that I need you to fact check for me because they were pretty pretty serious. Okay. So this fella's name is Bobby Powell. He's a former marine. Speaker 6: Oh, crazy Bobby Powell. We had lunch. That's correct. Speaker 12: Okay. And he said that you asked him how much it would take for him to be quiet talking about January 6 and for his footage to go away. That's a lie. That's a lie. So you did not offer him a $100,000? Speaker 6: I keep I don't have a $100,000 to offer him. Speaker 12: Well, he's he said the he said you offered him a 100 and then $200,000 that was coming from the head of the Michigan Republican Party that that you were basically the messenger and the head of the Republican Party was the one that was making the offer. That's that's a lie. Okay. Then the next thing he said was he wasn't gonna shut up. Somebody would have to kill him, and that you said this could also be arranged. Speaker 6: That's a lie. If you put something like that out, I would probably do at this point. Speaker 12: Instead of telling me you're gonna sue me, why haven't you sued him? So whether you believe the former congressman or the former marine independent reporter, the fact is not long after that lunch, someone tried to bomb the Jeremy Brown event where Bobby Powell was speaking. Speaker 1: This is a very unusual day for us because people with much less presence on January 6 near the violence that day have either been arrested, been sentenced, or been visited by the FBI. You're the first guy I've met that hasn't been visited by the FBI. Speaker 0: They don't wanna talk to me at all. They don't wanna know about Bobby Powell. I'm sure I'm keeping Christopher Ray up at night. God put me in a place where I could capture evidence that will flip this coup. If we can prove that those men were in the employ or acting on the behalf of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, A lot of powerful people are going to jail. I know people are afraid to do the right thing. I've I've had friends. People who I've hugged. People who I've been to dinner with. I've been in their houses. We sat around bonfires. Bobby, I'm ashamed. I can't share your video or I'll lose my job. The government has got these American citizens so terrified, and it's gotta end. And I don't want no one Speaker 4: to cry, but tell them if I don't survive. Speaker 5: Now I'm standing here today telling you God's truth, speaking in the name of and with the authority of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, because I am telling you the truth. It was the FBI and not Trump supporters who led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6.
The Truth Is Viral | Bobby Powell | Substack Exposing The January 6th Fedsurrection. Click to read The Truth Is Viral, by Bobby Powell, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. bobbypowell.substack.com
J6 Reporter Bobby Powell Exposes The Fedsurrection I was at the East Entrance to the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021. Two men I recorded attacking the building, breaking windows and pushing people inside, hav... givesendgo.com
The Truth Is Viral | Bobby Powell | Substack Exposing The January 6th Fedsurrection. Click to read The Truth Is Viral, by Bobby Powell, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. bobbypowell.substack.com
J6 Reporter Bobby Powell Exposes The Fedsurrection I was at the East Entrance to the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021. Two men I recorded attacking the building, breaking windows and pushing people inside, hav... givesendgo.com

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

CPAC 22 in Orlando was what we Marines call a "target-rich environment. I handed out scores of J6 packages to NatSec pros, US Reps, and every talking head I could find. @JackPosobiec was one of them, and he has never said a word to defend @realDonaldTrump or the J6 Hostages.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual provided video footage purportedly showing two federal agents attacking the Capitol on January 6th. A defense attorney for the Oath Keepers filed a motion identifying 80 "suspicious actors" and "material witnesses" present at the Capitol on January 6th who have not been arrested or charged. These individuals were concentrated in areas where trouble occurred, including the East Side and the Columbus doors. The attorney alleges some worked in tactical two-man teams and were later seen on the terrace. He seeks to identify them using facial recognition and questions if the events were staged. A radio journalist captured footage of two individuals he believed to be government agents. One was encouraging people to enter the Capitol after a window had been broken, even pulling out a pane of glass himself. When he realized he was being filmed, he blamed a protester and shoved him. The other individual was holding open the Columbus doors with a wooden pole and pushing people inside. The journalist who shot the video said the man shoved him. One person claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Man, I got something for you. Yes, sir. Speaker 1: There's my card. Okay. And here is video on a thumb drive of two federal agents attacking the capital on January 6. I've been on OAN and Newsmax Yeah. You've seen this? Speaker 0: I I may have seen you. I think I may have seen you on OAN. Yeah. Were you on with Natalie? Speaker 1: No. I was on with Dan Ball. With Dan Ball. Okay. And Greg Kelly on Newsmax. I'm trying to make sure You know, Speaker 0: you see on Newsmax too actually. With Greg Kelly. Yeah. That makes sense. Yeah. I'm I'm coming from OEM. Yeah. Was there prior. Speaker 1: Right. Well, I'm just Still friends. Good. I'm just trying to get everybody's Speaker 0: Still friends. Get this into everybody's got a good offer, you know. You know how it goes. Yeah. Speaker 1: I'm just trying to get this into everybody's hands because Speaker 0: Appreciate that. Speaker 1: You know, it's yours to do with as you will. I don't want a single cent from it. Put it on whatever show you happen to be on. Just mention my name and go say, Speaker 0: go see Bobby. Guy, you're gonna take a look at this and we're gonna dig in there. He's I've got got some some information information for for us, us, some videos. Videos. We You can can check take it a out. Look at it. Okay. No. Great. Thank you again. Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. Good to Speaker 0: you, sir. Good to meet Speaker 2: He's watching. One Speaker 3: of the defense attorneys for the oath keepers filed a motion that identified 80 what he calls suspicious actors and material witnesses. These are people who have not been arrested or charged or even identified. They're only identified by somewhat whimsical hashtags that the sedition hunters website assigned to them, and they were present in concentration in certain places where there was trouble, including at the on the East Side at the Columbus doors. So he went through and and he gave them numbers, and you'd see when the police line was breached. The breach point included it was almost exclusively the suspicious actors. Attorney Brad Geiger, when he filed this motion and he watched this over months, the video, that a lot of these fellows worked in two man teams, tactical teams. And then they were also seen later up on the terrace when they were trying to get into the Columbus store. He raised a big question, which would be exculpatory for a lot of defendants, that if there was anything that was staged, that calls a lot of things into question. And so he's trying to identify those people. He wants to use facial recognition using the government's own databases because these folks are not listed anywhere. And there's been no explanation. Prosecutors have adopted a policy of just no no comment outside of court filings. So we have asked, you know, can you explain this? And there has been no response. Obviously, there will be in in responding to the motions at some point. So we we don't know and how those folks got there. But it compared to people who were charged, and some of them very quickly, some on January seventh of twenty twenty one, to have people unidentified in that larger group that don't even have a name, much less be arrested or charged, that strikes me as very unusual. They were in various places. At the first breach point in a smaller number on the the East steps leading up to the rotunda, a much larger group. And then there were others that were at the location where Ashley Babbitt was shot. Pretty substantial, more than 20 that we've identified. For the most part, people that have not been arrested or even identified. Some of them are listed on the FBI's most wanted site, but we still don't know who they are. Who Speaker 4: is this individual we're looking at in this piece of footage? Speaker 3: Well, a radio journalist from Michigan was shooting video that day at the Capitol. What he captured were two most charitably called suspicious actors, but they are dressed in such a way that led him to believe that they were government agents. And one of them, after the windows had been broken by a protester, it was encouraging people to to pull the rest of the glass out and go inside. Bobby Powell, who was the journalist that had shot it, and he has his camera rolling, he told him that would be illegal, and that wouldn't be a good idea. He warned people off not to go in that window, and then he turned his camera around and he caught this agent or suspicious actor pulling a large pane of glass out. This tempered glass, it kind of folds in into itself, crunch onto the ground. When he realized he was being filmed, he quickly dropped it. It seems apparent on the video that he did not want to be seen doing what he what he just did. So he pulled in a protester and started blaming him. He said, what are you doing breaking that window? The poor fellow that was being accused didn't know what was going on. And then he gave him a couple of really good shoves and cocked his arm like he was gonna punch him. We don't know. His facial image is not on any of the sedition hunter sites or the FBI's most wanted site, But he clearly was committing criminal damage to property, and he has not been charged. So it, you know, again, it raises a question of why. Have we not been able to to discover his identity because his face was covered, and he was wearing dark glasses. Who's the other individual captured in this footage? At the nearby Columbus doors, these giant bronze ornamental doors, we had this second suspicious actor who was holding the door open, the inside door, with a wooden pole. He just stood there and had you know, it was like a fairly thick wooden dowel holding it open for a pretty good chunk of time. And he was also pushing people into the entryway. In fact, the journalist who shot this said he got a very strong shove at this side. It was, hold the line, hold the line, and was pushing people in. He probably would have been there longer, except he he got a a dose of tear gas in his face and was put out a commission, and then we don't see him again on that video. But making it easier for people to get into the Capitol and encouraging them with a good shove, again, raises questions about who is this fellow. Speaker 4: In addition to this so the guy is trying to push people through. These are captured at the same time by the same journalist. Also, the individual trying to, again, opening the window up is even encouraging people to enter, I believe, as well? Yes. What's he saying? Speaker 3: Well, he he he said, why don't y'all open the rest of it up? Speaker 2: Why don't you guys open open up? Speaker 1: Because I think that part would be illegal. Speaker 2: I know, man. My glasses. Speaker 3: He just came out of the blue. He was off to the side or behind the journalist who was busy picking up the broken glass. I'm pretty sure that's why he wheeled his camera around is to catch it because while he was telling him this, while he the suspicious actor was encouraging him, he was busy pulling the glass out. You could hear it crinkling while he's saying these things. So, you know, and again, it was just encouraging people to do what we're told they're not supposed to do. It's trespassing the capital. Speaker 2: Now I'm standing here today telling you God's truth, speaking in the name of and with the authority of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, because I am telling you the truth. It was the FBI and not Trump supporters who led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

On June 21, 2021, Ol' @dbongino received my video of federal agents leading the January 6th Fedsurrection via FB Messenger. I sent him updates via Msr & email for 9 months; but he never replied. So I sent a USPS registered letter to the address for BONGINO, INC. listed on the Fl. Dept. of Corporations website. Bongino signed for the package - containing thumb drive with the original video (that had already appeared on OANN & Newsmax), a 3-page written narrative, and my business card. For months I assured my viewers that Dan (I call him #Scooter) was a "good guy," and that he would be one of the few unafraid to air it. Turns out I was wrong, once again proving Bobby's Maxim: "Never underestimate the ability of human beings to amaze and/or disappoint you." I waited 6 months before calling him out on the @realstewpeters show, after which Dan Bongino took to the air and defamed me for 5 minutes in front of a claimed audience of 1.5 million people, claiming he had never seen it and that I "was using his name for clicks." He must have forgotten that a registered letter comes with a receipt, and that vaxxed troglodyte signed it himself. I am sorry to disappoint fans of the @BonginoReport, but Daniel Bongino has had video that could have turned the "insurrection" narrative into the proper "Fedsurrection" for 3.5 years and never aired it to defend @realDonaldTrump or the #J6Hostages. As of today, he has still not aired it. Y'all might want to ask him why.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bob Powell claims he sent Dan Bongino video evidence of the FBI leading the January 6th Capitol attack multiple times over 14 months, but Bongino has remained silent. Powell says Bongino called him a liar after listeners inquired about the video. Bongino denies knowing Powell and claims he receives many similar accusations. He says Powell claimed Bongino saw the video via Facebook Messenger and a registered letter. Bongino states multiple people have access to his Facebook account and he doesn't personally check every message. He also claims he moved from Palm City years ago due to security concerns, so he couldn't have signed for a package there. Powell clarifies he informed Bongino of his Palm City visit in advance and was near Bongino's office, not his home, when the letter was delivered. He claims Bongino's corporation is registered at the Palm City address. Powell accuses Bongino of slander and violating Florida statutes, threatening legal action due to damage to his reputation and financial strain from his activism. Powell maintains the FBI led the January 6th insurrection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, kids. How you doing? My name is Bob Powell, and you're watching the truth is viral. Are you ready to watch Dan Bongino's career go down in flames? Let's get right to it. I provided my video of two feds attacking the capital to Fox News contributor Dan Bongino at least half dozen times by Facebook Messenger, by email, and even a registered letter that he personally signed for on 12/14/2021, almost eight months ago. All told, Bongino has been in possession of this video for a total of fourteen months, but he has never said a word about it until this morning when he went on the air and called me a liar after a bunch of his listeners emailed him asking why he's been silent about this astonishing video which proves that the FBI and not Trump supporters led the attack on the capital for over a year, especially while January 6 prisoners are suffering and dying. Bongino says he doesn't know me. By the time this segment's over, he'll remember my name for the rest of his life. Ladies and gentlemen, mister Dan Bongino. I usually don't talk about this because we get garbage like this all Speaker 1: the time. I usually don't talk about it because of the Streisand effect. But I got particularly perturbed this morning when I woke up to a couple of emails from listeners like, Dan, have you heard this guy invoke your name suggesting you're hiding information about January 6? So when I was done laughing about hiding, if it's really weird how I'm hiding January 6, considering, like I said, I'm I'm just covering I was covering it on today's show no matter what. We've covered it ad nauseam. I've had all them as guests on my radio show. That's really, really strange how we'd be hiding anything. So I heard this guy. This is an individual by the name of Bobby Powell. He was on a podcast. And he's talking about how I'm hiding a tape out January 6, but he says something very interesting here, and I wanna prove to you. Thanks. I got a bunch of emails. Dan, are you control opposite? Yes. Control. I'm controlled. We're controlled by everyone. Gee, you got the control. The boss said he telling you what to do. The boss isn't me. Gee's controlled too. Guy says something very I'm gonna prove to you that people go out there and use my name and others to lie to you to get clicks. They lie. Lucky I'm not a litigious guy. They lie to you, and I'll prove it to you right here. Listen to what this guy said about a tape I'm supposedly hiding about January 6. Check this out. Speaker 2: I first gave Dan Bongino my video through Facebook on, in in June of last year. Think it was June 6 or, yeah, about right about then. And he never replied. Not not single time, but you know how on Facebook Messenger, you can see down down in the right hand corner, you can see that little icon that shows that the the person you've messaged has seen it. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. Of course. Speaker 2: Okay. So I know that he saw this, and I I doubled down because after a year gone by, I sent him a registered letter. I was sitting in a pizza shop not a quarter of a mile away from his house, his home studio in Palm City, Florida when he was when he was signing for that package, and that was last December. Speaker 1: Okay, folks. I don't know Bobby Powell from Powell Bobby. I have no idea who this person is. I again, I usually don't highlight this stuff. I was on Stu Peter's podcast, which, by the way, we have at Rumble, which I provide as a, as an investor, as a free speech platform for everyone, even people who attack me. So they conveniently put in the headline a clickbait title that I'm hiding this video. Let's address the Facebook thing first. There's about seven people, maybe more of access to my Facebook. They check messages all the time. I check them during my radio show. Even then, I don't get all that to all of them. Why? I put a picture. I was gonna show you the back end of it, but it's a waste of time because of people who they, oh, tall up. Ryan's telling me they're not gonna believe it is, so it doesn't really matter. I get about per hour. I woke up this morning at 05:00. I took a screenshot to send to Guy. You can at least vouch for me I sent it to you. Right? In ten minutes, I got about 25 messages at 05:00 in the morning. What do you think I do all day? I have no idea who clicked on this guy's, but he's sure I did. There's seven people who checked that Facebook bill. Maybe more, actually, including Paula. I try to check it during my radio show for feedback, which I've always and even then, I don't get to all of it. People send links all the time. I rarely click on them on Facebook because a lot of them are viruses. I have no idea what this guy's talking about. Speaker 0: As you can see from the last message that Dan Bongino sent to me on Facebook, he or one of the seven other people that he says has access to his Facebook account finally responded. After about a dozen updates over the last fourteen months, they responded with, please take these ridiculous posts elsewhere. That was lie number one. Speaker 1: But then he said, now this is how I can prove to you he's lying. He says, which is, by the way, is super creepy. I was sitting outside of his house in Palm City. Ladies and gentlemen, on a very serious note, I have had some really serious security problems around my house that forced me to move. I don't talk about it a lot because it just brings more attention. The local sheriff knows about it. Very serious. I have to hire security when I'm here, when I'm gone. It's not funny. I have kids. I have a young daughter. Speaker 0: Now to somebody that doesn't know who I am, I can see that the way Dan characterized my trip to Palm City might seem a little creepy. Except for the fact that before I went to Palm City, I introduced myself to Dan Bongino formally by email. One of four emails that I've sent to info@bongino.com over the last fourteen months. Let's read that email, shall we? Might clear a few things up. This email was sent on 11/29/2021. Dan, I'm the former editor of the now defunct Palm City Mirror. I reported for the Stuart News and was the entertainment editor of the Port St. Lucie News back in the day. I've been a journalist for thirty six years. Speaker 3: One minute thirty seven seconds later. Speaker 0: That the FBI refuses to return my phone calls, emails, acknowledge the evidence I provided, publish the images of the men I recorded attacking the Capitol, or accept my offer to come in for an interview pretty much seals the deal for me. Undercover federal agents played a major role in the insurrection on January 6. You may take what you need from my Substack feed and I am available for interviews. I also plan to be in Palm Beach soon so I can appear in studio if you like. God bless and simplify Bobby Powell, publisher, The Truth is Viral. So there was a very good reason that I was in Palm City. I used to live on Bobble Link Way, directly across the street from where Dan lives now. It was a cow pasture thirty years ago. But, you know, I still have friends in the area, and, you know, he he so I'm, you know, I'm visiting them. While I was there, I sent Dan Bongino a registered letter, and while I was before I left town, I wanted to make sure that he got it and called me because my phone number was right there. So when mail time came, I was sitting at a pizza shop a quarter of a mile away. I wasn't outside of his house. I don't present any kind of a danger to him or his family. Period. Let's move on. Speaker 1: But did you notice he said something? He said I had a package delivered to his house in Palm City he signed for him. Well, now I know he's lying. Because ladies and gentlemen, I don't live in Palm City, and my office isn't in Palm City either. I don't live in Palm City. I haven't lived in Palm City for years. So how the hell did I sign for a package at a place I don't even live in? Speaker 0: Folks, I graduated from broadcasting school in 1987. There are two types of broadcasters. You've got your journalist, and you've got your talking heads. Dan Bongino is an example of a talking head. He just gives his opinion, runs his mouth, but he never backs up anything. Have you seen any proof of anything so far from Dan Bongino? No. You have not. He just been flapping his gums and telling you a bunch of lies. Let me tell you how a reporter goes about determining what is true and what is not. Florida law requires corporations to be registered with the state and the state's databases are searchable by anyone with a computer. I guess Dan was so agitated this morning by all the emails that he was getting that he forgot all about the Internet. Bongino Incorporated is a Florida corporation registered at the address to which I sent the thumb drive and a three page written narrative of events that have transpired since January 6. You know, it's completely reasonable that someone might be hesitant to insert a thumb drive into their computer for fear of contracting window pox or some other computer virus. Okay? So I get that. That's the reason that I sent this written narrative to. You cannot get a computer virus from ink printed on paper. All he had to do to see this video was go to bobbypowell.substack.com, something that you should do as soon as this segment is over. Don't forget subscriptions are free, but should you care to support my work you can buy a paid subscription for just $5 a month. You can also go to give send go slash Bobby Powell and throw me a couple of bucks because I really need it. Anyway, Bongino said that he's not lived in Palm City for years. Yet just last year, he added an officer to the corporation. Dan Bongino could have taken that opportunity to update the address if he didn't operate there anymore, but he didn't. If his studio is not in Palm City, then Dan Bongino is in violation of Florida law. Speaker 1: This happens all the time, folks. Please don't believe the first thing you hear. This is how people turn on each other in the movement because they need clicks. That's a lie and an obvious one. Speaker 0: Dan Mangino made a terrible mistake today, 08/05/2022. He told millions of people that old Bobby Powell was a liar, defaming me and damaging my brand as an investigative journalist and teller of uncomfortable truths. That is slander. Not only has Bongino opened himself up to civil liability, he is in violation of Florida statute eight thirty six point zero one, a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and a $500 fine. Bongino states that he's not a litigious person. Unfortunately for him, I am. Not only have I had to sell my home after being demonetized by Big Tech after January 6, I spent every dime of my retirement nest egg traveling this country speaking at rallies for January 6 prisoners and handing out thumb drives to everyone with a pulse over the last eighteen months. I will not have my sterling reputation as an investigative journalist sullied by this simple little man. Speaker 1: And I don't want no one to cry, Speaker 3: Now I'm standing here today telling you God's truth, speaking in the name of and with the authority of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, because I am telling you the truth. It was the FBI and not Trump supporters who led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

On January 18th, 2001, @JamesOKeefeIII and @PVeritas_Action were sent my video of federal agents leading the Fedsurrection on J6. I never heard back from Jimmy or anyone else on the PV team. But remember, CPAC 22 was a "target-rich environment," and I ran into Jimmy and handed him one of my J6 packages. On May 13, 2022 I contacted Jimmy on LinkedIn asking if he was going to publish it, and he told me to follow up with PV staffer "Jonathan." "Jonathan" to me to f*ck off. PV had seen it before and was not interested in publishing. So much for "In Veritas."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims to have video footage from January 6th of two federal agents attacking the Capitol. Speaker 0 states they have been trying to get the FBI to investigate for over a year, providing them with twenty-nine minutes of high-definition footage. Speaker 0 says the FBI has not arrested the agents, nor have their images appeared online. Speaker 0 claims the FBI refuses to accept a statement or view video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. Speaker 1 says the FBI raided them twice, came to their home, and took their phones. Speaker 1 advises Speaker 0 to avoid the FBI if possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I've got something for you. Wrong bag. Yeah. Speaker 1: That'd be good. Speaker 0: There's a Speaker 1: it's illegal. The FBI will raid me. They've done it twice. Speaker 0: No. It's not secret. No. It's not on OAN and Newsmax. Speaker 1: On my door. Speaker 0: It's not secret. It's already been on OAN and Newsmax. I was Speaker 1: I'm just fucking Speaker 0: Okay. Well, there there's just a written version. I was Speaker 1: Why isn't the FBI looking for two metaphysically attacked? Exclusive inside FBI fomenting insurrection. No? Speaker 0: Well, see, I was at the East Entrance on January 6. Speaker 1: I was not there. Speaker 0: And I recorded two federal agents attacking the capital. Speaker 1: Well, federal agents came to my home and took my phones. They still have that. So, hopefully, someone will stand out. Speaker 0: Well, I've been trying to get the FBI to do something about it for over a year. I gave them twenty nine minutes of high definition footage of these two turds. And to date, neither one of them has been arrested and none of their images have appeared on the internet. You know, people have entered Speaker 1: FBI come to harass you? Speaker 0: They I've been a journalist for thirty six years. I sent thousands of foyers. Back in the day, used to be letters. Right? A government agency will always respond even if it's to say no comment. Speaker 1: They didn't respond to you? Speaker 0: They will they refuse to accept my offer to come in and give them a statement. All of my video from the fifth, sixth, and seventh, they don't wanna have anything to do with me. Speaker 1: Good. You don't want the feds coming to your house like they did to me. It's not fun. Is that Speaker 0: Well, I can imagine it is. Speaker 1: Crap and shit is Speaker 0: But I've got them I've I've got them by the Cajones. You Speaker 1: wanna head out? Alright. You Speaker 0: do great work. Can I shake your hand? Speaker 1: You. Avoid the avoid the FBI if Speaker 0: you can. Speaker 1: I mean, sometimes it's not within our control. We can't worry about things we can't control.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

This one really hurt, because I believed with every fiber of my being that @bennyjohnson was one of the good guys. He always has great interviews and ends his show with a Bible verse. I got the idea to send him a J6 package after he showed a short clip of #CapitolGlassman - the federal agent in black I filmed tearing a Senate window from its frame - from a @KanekoaTheGreat post on his show. I found his corporate address the same way I did #Scooter @dbongino's and sent Benny a J6 package that he personally signed for on 2/14/24. I even included a few paper packets of McDonald's salt as a silly surprise. I have redacted the address below out of concern for his beautiful family and newborn son. I'm not a total dick. So Benny Johnson has kept the truth from you as well; but it gets worse. Anyone who has every listened to the Benny Johnson Show is aware that the volume level between studio, guests, and pre-packaged segments is wildly inconsistent. One second you're listening to a very important interview, and the second the segment ends your ear drums implode because Benny's volume mic volume is too high. After Hurricane Debbie washed away my entire life with a 5-ft storm surge, I used my credit card and bought 8 $5 "Superchats" begging Benny for a job to help us get through the crisis that left us homeless, because I can run a board like nobody's business and he REALLY needs the help. People in the chat were rooting for me, and asking Benny to put me to work - I only live an hour from Tampa - and he ignored us all. Bobby's Maxim: "Never underestimate the ability of human beings to amaze and/or disappoint you." Jesus Christ, Matthew 25:35-40: "For I was hungry, and you fed me. I was thirsty, and you gave me a drink. I was a stranger, and you invited me into your home. I was naked, and you gave me clothing. I was sick, and you cared for me. I was in prison, and you visited me. “Then these righteous ones will reply, ‘Lord, when did we ever see you hungry and feed you? Or thirsty and give you something to drink? Or a stranger and show you hospitality? Or naked and give you clothing? When did we ever see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ “And the King will say, ‘I tell you the truth, when you did it to one of the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were doing it to me!’" Put that up on the screen at the end of your next show, Bennie; and read Revelation 21:8 while you're at it.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

I went to Tallahassee on 12/8/21 (bought a new suit and everything) and gave @RonDeSantis one of my J6 packages (thumb drive w/video + typewritten statement) of federal agents leading the J6 Fedsurrection. He has NEVER done a thing to defend the 100+ Florida citizens who were victims of federal overreach. In fact, DeSantis invited the US Capitol Police to establish a sub-station in Tampa to make it easier for the feds to persecute his own citizens. Florida is kinda out of their jurisdiction. https://www.tampabay.com/news/florida-politics/2021/07/29/us-capitol-police-plan-to-open-a-tampa-office-why/ Remember, he was just about to announce his run against @realDonaldTrump for @POTUS, so my belief is he never released my video because it would help Trump's campaign and hurt his own. DeSantis received a benefit by not reporting the felonious actions of the men I recorded attacking the Capitol to the FBI. That is a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony. I have requested "Sunshine Law" records generated by my visit several times but have never received a "good faith" response from @GovRonDeSantis office as required under Florida law. Isn't that right, @JeremyRedfernFL & @BryanDGriffin ? cc: @FreeJeremyBrown @Kash_Patel @PamBondi

U.S. Capitol Police plan to open a Tampa office. Why? It’s the first step toward geographic expansion for the notoriously opaque agency, which has been in turmoil since the Jan. 6 insurrection. tampabay.com

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

I have known @SebGorka wife Katharine since she was on the @POTUS @realDonaldTrump 2016 transition team. She was one of the first people to receive my video of federal agents (who never appeared on the FBI's J6 "Wanted" website) I recorded leading the Fedsurrection on 1/12/21. I HANDED one of my J6 packages (thumb drive, 3-page typewritten letter, & business card) to Sebastian himself at CPAC 22 on 2/24/22. After I tagged him on Twitter 1.0 asking what he thought, Gorka blocked me, then took to Facebook to threaten me for "threatening his wife" - something that never occurred - and called me a "crank" after I replied with a photo of my meeting with Trump attorney @PeterTicktin who was extremely pleased to receive the video. cc: @LauraLoomer @LoomerUnleashed @CcpSkipTracer @TheCharlesDowns should vet this Nazi sympathizer and get him the hell away from 45. Start here: https://feedsta.com/sebastian-gorkas-wife-katharine-gorka/

Sebastian Gorka's Wife Katharine Gorka (Bio, Wiki) Katharine Gorka is the author wife of Hungarian-American intelligence analyst, Sebastian Gorka. Married since 1996, they share two children. feedsta.com

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

Today, 6/10/25, @stevegrubershow posted, “Nobody gives a shit about J6 anymore.” I beg to differ. J6 was a COUP by the Deep State to cover up the stolen election of @POTUS @realDonaldTrump and We the People DO CARE. He also received on of my J6 packages of FBI agents attacking the Capitol (Thumb drive, 3-page typewritten narrative, and business card) at CPAC22. He never called, and never mentioned it on his “newscast.” Gruber is a coward and a traitor, and you all should know he is afraid to tell the truth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual visited a radio station (97.7 FM) to share video footage from Washington D.C. on January 6th, alleging it shows two federal agents attacking the building. The speaker claims to have provided the FBI with 29 minutes of high-definition video in MP4 format on January 15th. The video was recorded on an iPhone. According to the speaker, neither of the agents in the video have been arrested, nor have their images been released online. The speaker also claims the FBI has declined their offer to provide a statement and additional video from January 5th, 6th, and 7th. The speaker believes the FBI is actively concealing the agents' identities. The speaker states they have shared the video with OAN, Newsmax, Detroit, and Red America's Voice. They offered the video to the radio station and are available for an on-air appearance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CHY and Cheboyo Michigan. Yeah. Nice place. Ninety seven point seven FM. We'd love it. But I'm here today on a different mission of sorts. See, I was in Washington DC on January 6, and I recorded video of two federal agents attacking the building. There it is right there. Really? Yes, sir. I've given the FBI twenty nine minutes of high definition video. What what what format do we got? MP four. Alright. I gave the FBI twenty nine minutes of high definition video on January 15. A memorandum? Exactly. But I'll take it with you. Thank Thank you. So, yeah, it's yours. No. No copyright. I don't care about getting paid. I just want it out there. I will take it with you. I will be here all weekend. If you wanna have me on your show as a guest, I'm more than happy to go do so. Alright. Yeah. Yeah. I guess he has Alright. Well, there's my card. Thank you. I will take it with me. I'm just trying to figure out some things technically here today, but I will Tell me about it. What's that? Tell me about it. Yeah. Technical part is the worst part of this job, man. Being the chief cooking bottle washer, it was strung on a regular camera, an iPhone. Yeah. What do like? Camera or something? No. Just the iPhone. Oh, an iPhone. Alright. Gotcha. But, you know, like I said, gave the FBI all that video and today, neither man's been arrested. None of their images have appeared on the Internet and the FBI refuses to accept my offer to come in and give them a statement and all of the video that I took on the fifth, sixth, and seventh. So I don't know who these guys are exactly, but the FBI is desperate to keep their identities hidden. And who wants to be giving attention to you? Just about everybody. I've been on OAN and Newsmax. Right. I've played the video there. Yeah. But, you know, I'm giving here it to everybody with a pulse and recognize you from Detroit and, of course, and and Red America's Voice. Yep. And thought I'd come by and say hi. I appreciate that, Bobby. Nice to meet you, bro. I'll look at it, and then I'll call you. Okay. Like I said, I'm I'm in town all weekend. Different ways to do it. Yep. Have a great day. Yes. Yes. They probably

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

On 7/3/21 I attended a @POTUS @realDonaldTrump rally in Sarasota Fla. and HANDED @FmrRepMattGaetz my video of FBI agents - one of whom has since been identified as a "FBI special agent assigned to the Baltimore Field Office on J6 - leading the attack on the east side of the Capitol. After I introduced myself and told him what I had just given him, @mattgaetz said, "Thank you, Bobby, that is exactly what I've been saying in the House; that federal agents took part in the violence on January 6th." Performing my due diligence as a reporter, I followed up with Gaetz' press secretary Dawn McCardle, including a link to a previous Twitter thread so he didn't even have to insert the thumb drive into a computer to see the video; but never received a reply. So I sent a USPS registered letter to his district office and it was signed for by a staff member on 1/2/22. The letter included another thumb drive, a 3-page written narrative of events on and since J6, and my business card. Gaetz, a former member of @GOPoversight @Weaponization committee, has never said a word in defense of J6 hostages, or President Trump.

@LivesObi - 🏴‍☠️Bobby Powell🏴‍☠️

On 3/3/21, @SenHawleyPress secretary Ben Greunder acknowledged an email I sent to him with links to my video of FBI agents leading the Fedsurrection on the east side of the Capitol on YouTube. Remember, CPAC22 was a "target-rich environment." I handed @HawleyMO a J6 package with the original video, a 3-page written narrative, and my business card, on 2/24/22. I followed up by phone calls to Hawley's DC and district office on 3/18/22 after I had handed him the package, but I was blown off by both offices. "We'll call you back," they said. They never did. Hawley never once mentioned my video while he was "grilling" Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray about the presence of federal agents on J6, even though he knew the images of the federal agents I recorded smashing a window and holding the Columbus Doors open with a pole had never been uploaded to the FBI's database. All he had to do was ask, "Why hasn't the FBI uploaded images or video of these two men who were recorded committing violence on January 6th?" But he didn't. You might want to ask @HawleyMO why he didn't even TRY to nail Garland and Wray to the wall with a question they couldn't answer without committing perjury. Since the @EpochTimes video attached was released, more than 300 agents provocateur, whose images were never uploaded to the FBI database even though they were recorded assaulting Capitol Police and committing property damage against the Capitol itself, have been identified.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 gave the FBI a thumb drive containing 29 minutes of high-definition video showing two men attacking a building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. Speaker 0 states that despite going through over 725 indictments, none of their video or even a single still picture of either man has appeared on the Internet. The FBI is allegedly refusing to take Speaker 0's calls, return emails, or accept an offer to meet. Speaker 0 believes the FBI is hiding these men. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to inquire about the identities of these men. Speaker 0 confirms that Ben Grundler has all this information and that they have been in contact for over a year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you seen this video? No. Okay. Well, I gave the FBI there's a thumb drive in there with the original video on it. I gave the FBI twenty nine minutes of high definition video, two men attacking the building. As of this morning, neither man has been arrested. I've been through over 725 indictments. Yeah. Their video none of my video has appeared on the Internet, not a single still picture of either one of these guys. The FBI is refusing to to take my phone call, return my emails, or even accept my offer to come in and sit down with them. Yep. They are hiding these guys. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: And somebody needs to say something about this. Please tell me that you will get up on the well of the senate and say, who the hell are these men, mister FBI guys? Yeah. Speaker 1: Here. Hold on to this. Alright. Did you say there's the drivers in here? Speaker 0: Yes, sir. Okay. And Ben Grundler has all this information. I've been in contact with him for over a year now. Speaker 1: Gotcha. Awesome. So Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you, sir. What you're doing. God bless you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The January 6th events at the US Capitol are described as disgraceful and a deliberate assault on democracy. Bobby Powell, a retired radio journalist, claims to have video evidence of provocateurs or suspicious actors present at the Capitol. Powell describes witnessing a man removing a window and encouraging others to enter, as well as another man pushing people inside while yelling, "hold the line." He sent the video to the FBI but says the individuals have not been identified. Powell expresses frustration that his evidence and similar findings by attorney Brad Guyer are being ignored by media and politicians. Another speaker claims a group of provocateurs broke away and coordinated the removal of bike racks. They allege that suspicious actors provoked police and removed barriers, creating space for the crowd to enter, suggesting that most people believed they had permission to be there. One speaker claims that the FBI, not Trump supporters, led the insurrection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is now effectively a riot. Speaker 1: Thirteen forty nine hours declaring a riot. Disgraceful scenes in the US Congress. Shameful behavior by president Trump. It is a shame in front of the world. A deliberate assault on democracy by a sitting president and his supporters. The world is watching. One of the most troubling questions from January 6 is whether there were provocateurs or suspicious actors in the middle of the crowd. Retired radio journalist Bobby Powell has been trying to blow the whistle for three years with video evidence he shot on the East patio of the Capitol. Speaker 2: I don't care if you're carrying an American flag or wearing a Trump hat. Nobody was going into The United States Capitol through a broken window during a riot on my watch. You know, I was there as a reporter. I got down to the Capitol just before two and the West Side was already under attack. And as soon as I get up to the top of the Capitol Steps, I hear a banging and crashing to my right. So that's really good footage there that you want to see. I turn my camera around and there's a man pulling that window completely from its frame. He asked me, why don't you guys open up the rest of it? And I said, because that would probably be illegal. So, you know, it was clear from the things that he said to me that his intention was to open up that window and get people to go inside. I'm right there at the precipice of the Columbus doors when I hear a man in my left ear yelling hold the line, hold the line, hold the line. Now, I feel his hands on my back pushing me inside. My camera turns around and by the grace of God, I catch a good video of this guy holding the doors open with a with a pulley. As soon as I got everything together, I put it together, a nice little package and I sent it to the FBI on January 15. And to this day, he has not been identified. I don't care about money. I want this crime solved. They were calm. They were cold as ice. Okay. They knew exactly what they were doing. They acted like they were supposed to be there. Who are these men? Why have their images never been uploaded to the FBI database? Matter of fact, I've got the literal receipts right here in my pocket. United States Postal Service sending these thumb drives out 20 at a time. Reporters, politicians, they're just ignored and it's really making me angry. I've given this video to everybody with a pulse in media. Nobody wants to talk about my two guys. They don't want to talk about the 80 other guys that attorney Brad Guyer has found with with his team of attorney. Speaker 3: So at about 01:57 or so, the group of provocateurs broke away from about midway on the steps in the West, strafed the North side of the capital, and started gathering at the bike racks. Those bike racks were taken down in a coordinated fashion. It took forty seconds. Meanwhile, directly to the east of the steps, there are hundreds of people stacked in there that included provocateurs and suspicious actors, and they and arrived at roughly the same time as the group that came from the Northeast. We've worked with experts in that space. The suspicious actors that we've flagged is meriting further investigation. They're provoking police at the architectural stage. There's probably as few as six to eight people who actually removed the barriers in that Northeast. And had you not had them there to remove the barriers, the crowd behind would never have just moved to fill the space. Very few people had requisite intent to actively go and trespass. To most people, the vast majority of people who entered, they thought they had permission to do so. Speaker 0: And I don't want no one to cry, but tell them if I Now I'm standing here today telling you God's truth, speaking in the name of and with the authority of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, because I am telling you the truth. It was the FBI and not Trump supporters who led the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6.
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:43 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Oh, you mean this dude? Lol. https://t.co/jQRs0sv7K4

@eternal__goy - ✠ Zyklon B Enjoyooor II ☦️ (Ø,G)

@DecentBackup Mike (((Benz))) too lmao End Wokeness is also another account that will identify the problems but never the perpetrators 😂

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m not going anywhere, and those celebrating my downfall will be disappointed. Bellingcat, watch your words; you’ll face consequences. I see you, Beth Israel, Johnson & Johnson, and Harvard, along with EcoHealth and others. You attempted to harm President Trump, possibly because he uncovered your predictive COVID surges tool. Big thanks to @Theonlyme333 for the information on Beth Israel Deaconess, Johnson & Johnson, and Harvard.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We ain’t done. All you Flynn fa***ts currently celebrating my demise are gonna be massively disappointed, I’m afraid. Bellingcat, talk anymore shit to American citizens, you’ll get the same fucking treatment. And Totchani and Schapira, both your punk asses will join him. https://t.co/fW2mcG10Fu

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We see you too, BETH ISRAEL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and HARVARD. AKA, ECOHEALTH, HAKLUYT, CD&R and SANDRA PETERSON. You all tried to murder President Trump. Was it because he found out about your “PREDICTIVE COVID SURGES” tool you fucking terrorists were using on against Americans? https://t.co/s3gaUOo2yR

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

💥MASSIVE shoutout to my man, @Theonlyme333 on these BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and HARVARD receipts!🔥

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 6:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m curious about the details and want to hear more. It seems like there’s a lot of tension, especially with those celebrating my downfall. I won’t back down, and if anyone crosses the line, they’ll face consequences too.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

No, I don’t know the rest. You should tell me.

@Twisted17sister - 𝚃ωὶ𐒖ቲᥱ𝚍 𐍃ὶ𐍃ቲᥱᴦ 🎭

@_KrisHunter_ @DecentBackup He fucked around and you know the rest…

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Does it go something like this?

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We ain’t done. All you Flynn fa***ts currently celebrating my demise are gonna be massively disappointed, I’m afraid. Bellingcat, talk anymore shit to American citizens, you’ll get the same fucking treatment. And Totchani and Schapira, both your punk asses will join him. https://t.co/fW2mcG10Fu

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 11:25 PM

@PennyDread88 - Dredd Penny Giver of Trophies 🏆

Can't keep a good man down!

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We ain’t done. All you Flynn fa***ts currently celebrating my demise are gonna be massively disappointed, I’m afraid. Bellingcat, talk anymore shit to American citizens, you’ll get the same fucking treatment. And Totchani and Schapira, both your punk asses will join him. https://t.co/fW2mcG10Fu

Saved - February 13, 2025 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the misinformation surrounding AIPAC and its connections, particularly regarding the Flynn network. I’ve worked hard to expose their actions and hold them accountable. The accusations of antisemitism are unfounded, especially when discussing serious issues like bioweapons targeting specific groups. I’m back and ready to confront those who celebrate my challenges. I won’t back down from anyone trying to silence me or spread false narratives.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

No, I’m not, you fucking idiot. AIPAC is literally Mossad and nobody on this entire platform has put out more to expose their crimes and criminals, by name. Same goes for the Flynn network. And fuck your “antisemitism” bullshit. They released a bioweapon targeted at Whites and murdered our loved ones in hospitals. Then, they send midwits like you to defame and try to stigmatize any of the Whites who are cognizant and righteously outraged by it. Meanwhile, we can revisit your Sheriff Lamb (Sinaloa) ties any time you’d like.

@BiggerTruth - Scott McMahan

@MrsFarkas_ AIPAC is one of many different lobbying groups that funds nearly every senator and rep. I don't read much into it. Decent Backup is a Flynn Network op that is deliberately trying to sow antisemitism.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

This is literally my first post when I came back.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We ain’t done. All you Flynn fa***ts currently celebrating my demise are gonna be massively disappointed, I’m afraid. Bellingcat, talk anymore shit to American citizens, you’ll get the same fucking treatment. And Totchani and Schapira, both your punk asses will join him. https://t.co/fW2mcG10Fu

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m deeply concerned about the current push in Congress to combat antisemitism, which seems to be a cover for stigmatizing those of us who seek justice for victims of COVID and vaccines. My friend Lyndsey has been misled by those around her, and it’s infuriating to see her threatened for standing up against this deception. The tactics used against her are manipulative, aiming to intimidate her while deflecting from the real issues at hand. I won’t tolerate any threats against her or our community. We need to stand firm against this coordinated attack.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

PSA: Read all of this, then realize what’s being pushed so heavily right now within Congress: “Combating antisemitism” By “antisemitism”, what they REALLY want is to have motherfucking CARTE BLANCHE to stigmatize ANYBODY like ME/OUR CREW, who is a NON-JEW, who truly FIGHTS THEIR ASSES OFF to obtain the long-overdue, RIGHTEOUS JUSTICE for thousands of their innocent victims (like Lyndsey), with labels like “NAZI”, “JEW-HATER”, “ANTISEMITE”, etc. And if this horseshit isn’t put to bed with OUR fucking generation, it’ll be used against our kids and our grandkids… and it’ll be 10-100x worse. Think I’m full of shit? Okie doke. Let’s go to the post highlights from “both sides of the COVID/vaccines issues” spectrum and check in on the “Mouse Army” (Jikky/Melissa) and “Counter Mouse Army” (Real Truther/Canceledmouse) crews. *NOTE: Watch how quickly they turn on Lyndsey as their exposure reaches critical mass. See the bottom left and bottom right, where go from defending her (Melissa) at the to “still waiting on your lawyer’s number” passive aggressive thinly-veiled threats from @JohntheLyricist at the bottom right. (See next post below for more.)

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

What this story from Faceles doesn’t bother to mention, is that Lyndsey is a friend of mine and nobody on this platform has worked harder to uncover the crimes behind COVID and the vaccines than I have. Not a soul. And when I’d told her months ago about who was involved with COVID/vaccines, and then brought up the IDF, she had to ask me what it was… because the people all around her that were supposedly helping her had never bothered to mention the IDF’s or Israel’s involvement in all of this COVID/vaccine bullshit to her even ONCE. Now that we’ve dispositively corroborated everything I’d told her back then, it feels appropriate to also mention that she, being the kind, genuine and trusting human she is, actually STOOD UP FOR THE PEOPLE SURROUNDING HER when I began to doubt their motivations… because she TRUSTED THEM, and believed everything they’d been telling her was the truth. So I dropped it for the time being. *SPOILERS: It’s why she was a fucking WRECK yesterday, and why I was so furious as we continued putting out the additional intel. Because of what you fucking ghouls did to someone YOU’D ALREADY FUCKING HARMED… to PROTECT YOURSELVES. And because Lyndsey is a friend of mine, and I understand the level of sinister, grotesque deception that was being played on her better than ANYONE, I was (appropriately) madder than anybody. It’s also why I’d reached out to her BEFORE I put out the receipts to let her know what we’d uncovered. Because she was FINALLY, for the FIRST time, about to learn the truth about COVID, vaccines and the vile infiltrators around her. The ones who’d WILLINGLY, INTENTIONALLY HARMED HER, and then SOUGHT HER OUT to gain, capitalize on and then BREACH, the hopeful trust of one of their own victims. And it’s why you’re here right now, not refuting any of the overwhelmingly fucking incriminating receipts of your genocidal horseshit. Instead, you’re relegated to nitpicking the appropriateness of a singular tonal response in the moment of having resolved highly polarizing, emotionally-charged issues that hit way too close to home. Get. Completely. Fucked. Traitor.🙏🏼🇺🇸🫡

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

For some reason, this would NOT upload in the first post. It’s where @JohntheLyricist threatens Lyndsey with potentially “SeRiOuS” consequences for her acts of “threats and defamation” and “willingly consorting with Nazis”. What’s the big deal here? See the next post.👇 https://t.co/yMtzSDW5Ja

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

@JohntheLyricist really did us all a favor and unwittingly gave their whole fucking game away. You probably wouldn’t Notice™️ the two intentional, carefully-calculated things he’s doing right here simultaneously. But this fucking bullshit doesn’t get by me anymore for even a second: 1. Instead of QUOTING Lyndsey’s post directly and/or embedding a screenshot only of something LYNDSEY said, he embeds a screenshot of MY POST, and includes Lyndsey’s REPLY in the image — it was a FACTUAL COMMENT about her real-world experiences in dealing with the REAL TRUTHER (Mossad) account. So what’s the big deal about all THAT? Welp, the post he carefully chose as his screengrab was the one where I’m noting how this whole “Real Truther” saga got started and how it has since ended: Started: Real Truther, whom I’d NEVER ENGAGED prior to my account being nuked, celebrating the permanent “Nazi demise” of my @DecentBackup account. Ended: Real Truther ends up exposed as a Mossad asset tied to the fucking Panama Papers.🤣 (Shit you not.) Why is THAT important? Because their only counter move to having one of their own key operatives taken off the board is to try taking one of YOUR key operatives off the board. It’s literally how my previous account got suspended — retiring Bellingcat/Anonymous. (It’s EXACTLY why the Flynn cronies were making ‘he fucked around and found out’ comments on the timeline, right after my @DecentBackup account was nuked.) But here, he gets greedy and tries to simultaneously defend his recently-fallen comrade, and then take both me AND LYNDSEY off the board. He’s attempting to psychologically ascribe the “collective GUILT” of shit that I JUST FUCKING POSTED onto Lyndsey, who is NOT INVOLVED with the REAL TRUTHER SITUATION in any way. And as he INTENTIONALLY does this, he makes VEILED “LEGAL” THREATS at LYNDSEY, using spooky Jewspeak buzzwords like “DeFaMaTiOn” and “ThReAtS” that she, in her current, emotionally-sensitive and immunocompromised state, might be especially vulnerable to feeling intimidated by this egregious horeshit… (Also because this punk ass bitch KNEW BETTER than to try pulling that shit with ME.) …so then HE TAGS HER AND TAGS JIKKY, for ALL the Mouse Jew Army crew to see and quickly flock to, like some synagogue ‘BAT SIGNAL’, and then forces her to deal with the ADDED STRESS/FEAR OF BACKLASH for some shit SHE DIDN’T EVEN FUCKING SAY. (I said it. I stand behind it. Deal with it.) So how do we know he’s doing EXACTLY FUCKING THIS, and it’s just more disingenuous coercive Jewish bullshit? Because when I called his punk ass out for threatening Lyndsey, he replied with an embedded image referencing a previous post of LYNDSEY’S that he doesn’t like. (Here’s where this fa***t fucks up. Bigly.) The problem, however, and where he gives himself and their WHOLE FUCKING JEW COORDINATION STRATEGY away, is that the post he then cites from LYNDSEY isn’t even a recent fucking post. It’s from JUNE 2024, 8 fucking months ago.🤣 This JEW operative FA***T spent all this time CAREFULLY-selecting the specific screenshot to crop and embed, the EXACT PEOPLE he’d TAG, and the APPROPRIATE VERBIAGE to use, all to paint her as some cunty bad actor who’s just jumping in to “pile on” the Mossad corpses we’ve been leaving in our wake of destruction the past few days. And then, he fucking drops a “Jikky, GET YOUR PEOPLE IN LINE!” just in case you weren’t quite TOTALLY convinced they’re there to LEAD (control) BOTH SIDES OF THE OPPOSITION. 💥NEWSFLASH: Listen up, you fucking mafioso LARP’ing fa***t. If you thought it was defamation, and you’re really a fucking doctor, you’d have sued her ass already. Back then. But you haven’t. And you won’t. Because it isn’t. Regardless of how much you threaten VACCINE-INJURED AMERICAN WOMEN. PS: One last thing — if you EVER threaten or harass another female in MY/OUR fucking network again, including and especially LYNDSEY, you’ll have some irl problems, fa***t. Get. Fucked.🇺🇸🫡

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Hey, John. Why are you being a punk and bothering Lyndsey? Why not deal with me?

@JohntheLyricist - Dr John Michael 🗿

Still waiting on your lawyers number @HouseLyndseyRN Threats and defamation are no joking matter Why are you willingly consorting with Nazis? @Jikkyleaks you need to get control of your people. You don’t want to be associated with Nazis do you?

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

@JohntheLyricist Typos (2): 1st post *bottom right, where THEY go from *at the BOTTOM LEFT, TO THE “still waiting…” https://t.co/zdGul2PSHu

Saved - February 23, 2025 at 12:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the narrative surrounding Ashley St. Clair and Elon Musk, questioning her claims about their relationship's timeline. I noted discrepancies in her statements and suggested that her meeting with Elon, facilitated by Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee, might indicate a deeper agenda, possibly linked to Israeli influence operations. I raised concerns about Dillon's connections to known Israeli operatives and the implications of Musk's dealings in Israel. The situation raises questions about the motivations behind the media coverage and the potential for manipulation within these networks.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵1/ IS ASHLEY ST. CLAIR A MOSSAD HONEYTRAP/"SPARROW?" In the first New York Post article the day after Ashley St. Clair announced her baby with Elon Musk, she claimed that she didn't initially have an "much of an interest in Elon" until after she met him in May 2023 at an interview at Twitter HQ. But there she is on May 2nd, 2023, telling @IsabellaIsMoody that she wants to be funny for Elon in order to have his "rocket babies." This date is important. That meeting with Elon Musk at Twitter HQ was on May 22--3 weeks after telling Isabella she wanted Elon's babies. IOW, she lied in the Post article about not being interested in Elon until after she met him. Strange. It looks like she's constructing a false narrative to make it look like their romance was innocent & spontaneous after having met. Why would she need to do that unless it wasn't actually innocent & spontaneous? But the plot thickens a little more. Seth Dillon, CEO of the Babylon Bee, is the one that facilitated her meeting Elon IRL. He had her fly out for that Babylon Bee interview with Elon, as Ashley noted in the Post article and confirmed by Ashley's own tweet from May 22, 2023. But Ashley wasn't ultimately pictured in the Bee's announcement of the interview with Elon, nor did she participate in the video interview itself at any point. This sort of begs the question: why did Seth Dillon fly her out to meet Elon? Is it because Dillon is part of an israeli influence operation himself as some--including myself--have suggested? What if this entire thing was an israeli sparrow/honeypot entrapment scheme that the Mossad is known to run on powerful people--like it did with Monica Lewinsky on Bill Clinton?

@IsabellaIsMoody - Isabella Moody

In May 2023, Ashley St Clair asked me for tips on being funny, because she wanted to seduce Elon Musk and have his “rocket babies.”

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵2/ Seth Dillon & The Babylon Bee: Part of an israeli influence operation? Here Dillon appears in a PragerU promotional video with known israeli intelligence operative Marissa Streit. Streit served in the elite IDF Unit 8200 & has sworn an oath of loyalty to israel. As a friend to Streit & a zionist jew himself, Dillon knows & understands these details. What is he up to?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey Seth, oh my god, we're matching! I really thought these were men's socks. What are you doing wearing these? Oh wait, hold on a second. What was my line? Oh, right. You can match me! I'm not even sorry. Can I even say that? I was reading a message and got totally distracted. But seriously, they're gender neutral. You can match with us too!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my god, Seth, we're matching! I thought wait. Hold on. What was my line? You can match me. I'm not sorry. Can I do that? I was reading a message. I was totally distracted. Alright. You know what? Hey, Seth. Oh my god. We're matching. I thought these were men's socks. What are you doing wearing these? They're gender neutral. You can match with us too.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵3/ More on Seth Dillon's Influence Operation via The Babylon Bee in this extensive, multipart thread. Read this or bookmark it and come back.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

✝️ "MY FELLOW CHRISTIANS!" 🇮🇱 Last week, we exposed Libsoftiktok and Radio Genoa as zionist operations who blocked me. Today we're doing Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee. Yes, the "mighty" Seth Dillon, "Christian convert," fearless comic & "champion" of free speech--blocked me. That's right, the vaunted founder of the "hilarious" Babylon Bee--the platform that drafted off of Christian self-satire to build its audience, the platform that was "canceled" for exercising its free speech--doesn't like what I have to say about what he's doing. Here's his gig: Everybody knows about the the "My Fellow White People" trick--jews position themselves as White: ▪️ To help gatekeep White sentiments away from "antisemitism," ▪️To garner support for Israel as a "Fellow Western nation," ▪️To attack & weaken White solidarity & identity so that it can't effectively organize against attacks or resist jewish power, and ▪️To stir up racial animus towards Whites from other races Jews do the exact same thing with Christians & Christianity. They pose as Christians to infiltrate Christianity, to gatekeep Christians into supporting israel and to gatekeep Christians away from those who don't support israel, and to promote messaging that helps jews, but hurts Christians. Ultimately, this creates confusions and weakens Christianity so that it can't effectively organize to resist jewish supremacy and subversion. Seth Dillon is an ethnic jew, who poses as a Christian, but is actually running an influence operation just like the "My Fellow Whites" scheme. I call it the "My Fellow Christians" psyop. And similarly to Libsoftiktok and Radio Genoa--he steers eyeballs, traffic and influence towards himself and the zionist cause and diverts resources and influence away from those Christians who aren't aligned with the zionist terror colony, who actually stand up to jewish power. That is why he blocked me. He doesn't want the scheme shattered for his followers. Read the tweet below that got me blocked.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵4/ Important Timeline Details From Ashley's own tweet & an earlier tweet from Milo in September 2024, we establish that Ashley & Elon's child was born in early September 2024. 9 months previous to that would be late November/early December 2023--just after Elon's famous trip to israel to see the fake atrocity propaganda on November 27th. 1 month before that, Ashley divulged that she'd come off birth control. What really happened on Elon's israel trip?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵5/ WHAT HAPPENED ON THE ISRAEL TRIP? Musk met w/investors, spies & military officials about so-called antisemitism on X & signed an agreement to put an israeli intelligence cut-out in charge of controlling bots & fake accounts. But there's lots more:

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

So it turns out that Elons trip to Israel wasn't just for kosher theater and an IDF propaganda tour. A secret meeting took place while he was there that went virtually unreported by any news media outlets. In attendance was Netanyahu, Musk's tour organizer, investor Omri Casspi, Brigadier General Danny Gold, Head of the Israeli Directorate of Defense Research & Development and one of the developers of Iron Dome, Aleph venture capital funds partner Michael Eisenberg, and Israeli cybersecurity company CHEQ CEO Guy Tytunovich who is ex-israeli intelligence unit 8200. The six men talked about technology in the service of Israel's defense, dealing with fake content and anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli comments, and the use by non-democratic countries of bots as part of campaigns to change perceptions, including on the X platform. The solution Musk was presented was the Israeli unicorn CHEQ, a company founded by ex-Israeli intelligence unit 8200 CEO Guy Tytunovich that combats bots and fake users. Following the meeting, Elon signed an agreement with cheQ, and apparently, the reason for the quick closing of the deal was Elons "direct involvement" with the company. Now. What they won't tell you. Israel is primarily responsible for the creation of bots. There currently exists dozens of ex-Israeli intelligence firms whose sole purpose is perception management, social media influencing/manipulation, disinformation campaigns, psychological operations, opposition research, and honey traps. They create state of art, multi layer, AI avatars that are virtually indistinguishable from a real human online. They infiltrate target audiences with these elaborately crafted social-media personas and spread misleading information through websites meant to mimic news portals. They secretly manipulate public opinion across app social media platforms. The applications of this technology are endless, and it has been used for character assassination, disruption of activism/protest, creating social upheaval/civil unrest, swaying elections, and toppling governments. These companies are all founded by ex-Israeli intelligence and members of unit 8200. When they leave their service with the Israeli government, they are backed by hundreds of billions of dollars through Israeli venture capital groups tied to the Israeli government. These companies utilize the technology and skills learned during their time served with Israeli intelligence and are an extension of the Israeli government that operates in the private sector. In doing so, they operate with impunity across all geographical borders and outside the bounds of the law. The Israeli government is forbidden by law to spy on US citizens, but "ex" Israeli intelligence has no such limitations, and no laws currently exist to stop them. Now back to X and Elon Musk. Elon met with these people in secret to discuss how to use X in service of Israel's defense. Elon hired an ex-Israeli intelligence firm to combat the bots.... that were created by another ex-israeli intelligence firm. Elon hired an ex-israeli intelligence firm to verify your identity and collect your facial biometric data. Do you see the problem yet? Israel now has end to end control over X. Israel can conduct psychological operations and create social disinfo/influence campaigns on X with impunity. They now have facial biometric data from millions of people that can be used to create and populate these AI generated avatars. They can manipulate public opinion, influence congressmen and senators, disrupt online movements, manipulate the algorithm to silence dissenting voices against Israel, and they can sway the US elections. When the company that was hired to combat the bots is also Israeli intelligence... Who is going to stop them?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵6/ Why is Ashley hanging around with other suspected israeli intel/influence operatives? I've previously detailed the suspicious backgrounds and activities of Mike Benz & Arynne Wexler. What's going on?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵7/ Mike Benz is likely an israeli intelligence operative:

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

🧵1/ Mike Benz, renowned expert on internet censorship--regularly names the FBI, the CIA, various NGOs, etc--but over several hours on Tucker Carlson & Joe Rogan, never named the ADL, the Mossad or Unit 8200. Probably just a simple oversight, right?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵8/ Arynne Wexler is likely part of an israeli influence operation:

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

🧵1/ Arynne Wexler is another j-ish/chabad/israeli influence op like Chaya Raichik of Libsoftiktok.

@AlfredAlfer77 - Linda

Who is Arynne Wexler? Emily and Warren take a closer look at the hot new conservative influencer featured in @NYMag's viral article "The Cruel Kid's Table" Clip from our latest episode of Modern Politics: https://odysee.com/@modernpolitics:0/ModPol-CruelKids:4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Erin Wexler is a new conservative commentator who is making waves. She has degrees from Wharton and Penn and a background in finance and tech. Her website features merchandise and showcases appearances with figures like Ben Shapiro and Glenn Beck. Wexler is openly Jewish and her persona revolves around her Jewish identity. Her writings for The Blaze focus on Israel and related issues. After October 7th, she gained prominence, launching an Instagram account and publishing articles. She has quickly gained a large following, including high-profile figures like Joe Rogan and Donald Trump Jr. She even had the opportunity to tell President Trump a joke during a lunch at Mar-A-Lago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. So who who is this this girl that's just like this new it girl here? Where did she come from? Who is she? We'll get into her. Speaker 1: You don't have to churn your own butter on a homestead, Aaron Wexler, the influencer, told me before the weekend began. You can be urban, live in a condo, go to Casa Capriani, and still be normal and vote for Donald Trump. Here's Erin Wexler. Here's her website. A new kind of conservative commentary. Viral sensation Aaron Wexler is shaking up traditional conservative commentary with a bold new take. A lightning rod for attention, Aaron has been reacted to by notable figures like Ben Shapiro, featured in Daily Mail UK, and published in The Federalist, The Blaze, and Tablet magazine. Erin's voice is making waves. With degrees from Wharton and Penn and a background spanning the trading floor at Goldman Sachs to the startups of Silicon Valley, she isn't shy. Her insights leave audiences either triggered or begging for more. It also has merch such as T shirts that say not a low t soy beta. Speaker 0: So she Speaker 1: woah. Baste. The baste with a period after it. Speaker 0: Hello. Baste department, we're bringing back we're still using the low t soy cuck beta words. Wow. Innovative stuff. Speaker 1: And then, of course, her featured in section shows Ben Shapiro, Glenn Beck, The Blaze, Tablet Mag, Tablet Mag Podcast, Dave Rubin, among others. So Speaker 0: Oh, wow. That sounds like really Jewish. Do you think she's Jewish? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: She's she could possibly be Jewish? Yes. So she doesn't just, you know, happen to be Jewish. She's not just a Jewish girl. Right? She is, like, a mega Jew. Yep. And you don't have to dig too far to see that this is, like, her main thing. Her entire persona is about being Jewish. If you look at her profile in the tablet, it says Erin Wexler studies with rabbi Joshua Weisberg of Jerusalem. She is a community member of Yaqar Tel Aviv, Altnew, New York, and Shabbat, Miami. This is her big article here. The battle cry of Hanukkah. Time to bring back the spirit of Jewish defiance and anti assimilation from 12/05/2023. Wow. Can you say winning? So do you think this girl thinks of herself as white? Do you think she identifies with a white race? It's clear that she doesn't. She's not just trying to blend in with white people and the kids on the cover. She is trying to bring back the spirit of Jewish defiance and anti assimilation. Speaker 1: Back in November, Sam Parker got into it with her on Twitter, and he called her an Israeli influence operation. And it's not even, like, disguised. Yeah. It's it's very I mean, this is this girl is so unbelievably Jewish, you know, up to and including her her her nose job. Like, she is she is the absolute pinnacle of, like, Jewish American princess Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: But also Esther. You know, she's doing the thing. She's doing the bit. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, if you read this article, man, this is the most Jewish article that I have ever seen. Speaker 1: And, of course, you know, her all her pieces for The Blaze are about Israel. This conflict is so much bigger than Israel, and it's already here. And then another one in November, sanctions relief for Iran shows how little The US has learned. December 8, Hamas kills all creatures, great and small. Speaker 0: So so it's it's pretty clear what what her agenda Speaker 1: is Speaker 0: here. Speaker 1: Yeah. But but she is the central figure of this article in New York mag, The Cruel Kids Table. And in fact, it becomes clear later in the article that the author met with her ahead of time and and really was her she was the in to this author. So what I surmise, and I I don't think it's very reachy to say this, is that someone at New York Mag set this up Yeah. With this with this Jew, Aaron Wexler, and they put it together, and they sent this trans person to to do the job, you know, with the editorial guidelines, and and the whole thing was a puff piece. Speaker 0: Why wasn't she on the cover? You know? Of course, they use, like, blonde, white, all American girls they put on the cover, and then the the star of the article is this Jewish girl. One year ago, she started an Instagram with the handle non lib take, where she this is like the same thing like libs of TikTok, which is run by a Jewish account. Speaker 1: Post October 7. You notice that? Speaker 0: Her all Speaker 1: her articles were published it started in November of twenty twenty three. So Speaker 0: Yeah. And the battle cry for Hanukkah was December 2023. Speaker 1: Yeah. So her whole she just came out of nowhere right after October 7. Like, the month after October 7. Speaker 0: And this is her out of nowhere. Yeah. Big debut here. Speaker 1: So Today, Wexler has 264,000 followers, including Joe Rogan, Donald Trump junior, and Dana White, who says she once invited her to a UFC fight. Speaker 0: This sounds so organic. Speaker 1: Late last year, while lunching at Mar A Lago, she says one of Trump's handlers recognized her and let her tell the president a joke. Speaker 0: What's the difference between a liberal Jew and Donald Trump? One has Jewish grandchildren. In parentheses, Wexler is Jewish. Oh. Yes. They they finally said it. Wow. Thanks. I had no idea. So the wait. So she just happened to be lunching at Mar A Lago, just happened to be there, and she just knew one of Trump's handlers who let her tell the president a Jew joke. Speaker 1: A Jew joke. Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. This is just, like, fucking, like, straight out of Massad. I mean, come on. Speaker 1: Yeah. It absolutely is.
Fake Right Jew-CIA Counterculture Warren and Emily examine the fake right-wing "counterculture" which is being aggressively astroturfed from the top down by Zionist money and influence in America. odysee.com

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵9/ Who is Ashley St Clair & what is she up to? ▪️She premeditated her seduction of Elon Musk ▪️She lied about it ▪️Her meet-up with Elon was facilitated by Seth Dillon of the Babylon Bee--a suspected israeli influence operation ▪️She conceived the child just after Elon's trip to israel--after which this platform underwent significant changes & Elon signed secret contracts w/israeli intel companies ▪️She hangs out with other known israeli influence/intel operatives like Mike Benz & Arynne Wexler ▪️She's now bombarding Elon with a fusilade of exposés in the New York Post--a newspaper owned by Netanyahu's close personal friend & political donor, Rupert Murdoch. Is she really getting all this "unearned" press on her own? Why is the Post pushing this so hard? 🧐🤔

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵10/ What would an israeli intel operation be without a controlled counter-narrative disseminated by other controlled influencers? Isn't it curious that Arynne Wexler's podcast partner, Emily Saves America, is published in one of the New York Post articles calling Ashley a "grifter?" Arynne Wexler is close friends with Ashley. How would her other close friend Emily come to be found in one of these articles condemning Ashley? Pretty big coincidence, wouldn't you say? What's going on?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵11/ Full Circle So we're supposed to believe that after Arynne Wexler heaped praise upon her close friend Ashley St. Clair on Feb 14th--that then her other close friend Emily Saves America subsequently trashed Ashley, and that that trashing organically found its way into a New York Post article on the 16th? Sure Jan. 🤣 Bonus: Seth Dillon jumping back into the narrative. 👀 Who are these people and what are they up to?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵12/ If you appreciate my research, please consider supporting my work financially since Elon Musk demonetized me and took my paid subscribers away as well. BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal CashApp, Crypto and more at this link: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵13/ If you enjoyed this thread, then I think you'll also enjoy this related thread: https://t.co/IYotA1wO61

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

They will try to honeytrap Barron and we can't allow it. https://t.co/AVXt1ghdr9

Saved - March 23, 2025 at 11:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread on the top 7 savage FAFO moments. Each moment is a mix of instant satisfaction and justice served. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for news the mainstream media misses and @DOGE__news for updates on DOGE while taking a stand against liberal narratives.

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

🔥 Top 7 Savage FAFO Moments A thread 🧵 1. Instantaneous https://t.co/WdMc5On2Bu

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

2. Satisfying to watch https://t.co/ElOilPU3SZ

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

3. Good https://t.co/aivkiWvVOj

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

If you are not already, I recommend you follow @ResisttheMS The report the news that the mainstream media won't. https://t.co/EXj2WoT1qc

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

4. Got what she deserved https://t.co/WcSeE5Ungw

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

5. She found out https://t.co/n2BY2D6Qrj

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

Another great follow is @DOGE__news They keep you updated on DOGE and destroy liberals daily. https://t.co/iNefgLyGuq

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

6. Looking for you https://t.co/aQJgrqqYcy

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

7. Interesting how that turned out https://t.co/sn35KSuhDX

Saved - April 15, 2025 at 10:12 PM

@gmcnuggetz - glennmcafee

Add another one to the collection. https://t.co/364Thi1G5t

@HolaKetty - Ketty D

👺The face of pure evil.👺 https://t.co/l2FeCGMkKC

@mistergusano - Gusano

@DG1999FL The shut it down? Don’t know. The other part? 100% He was behind George Floyd and the entire Minnesota insanity.

Saved - May 29, 2025 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how to navigate interactions with Mossad agents, referencing Mike Benz's views on NGOs and their influence. I expressed concern about Benz, noting that he avoids discussing AIPAC and similar groups, which raises red flags. I highlighted his past with the "Frame Game" account, which pushed harmful narratives while masquerading as a deradicalization effort. His sudden emergence in the public eye and the lack of a prior digital footprint suggest a carefully crafted persona. I urge others to investigate his background, as it seems orchestrated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

How to deal with Mossad agents. (receipts in the comments) https://t.co/4Rp9SCGUfQ

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Mike Benz on how NGOs run the world on behalf of a small number of very dangerous people. (0:00) Introduction (1:20) What Are NGOs? (5:11) The 3 Levels of The Blob (9:00) Why the CIA Was Really Created (21:41) Why So Many American Companies Are Wrapped up in the NGO Madness (24:02) George Soros’ Open Society Foundation (30:54) Foreign Governments’ Failed Attempts to Escape NGO Control (36:58) The Dark Side of America’s Global Domination (42:14) The Soros Connection to the State Department Is Deeper Than You Think (50:33) How the CIA Controls the Education System (58:03) The Anti-American Agendas American Taxpayers Are Funding (1:01:19) What You Should Know About the US Institute of Peace (1:11:57) What DOGE Found When They Tried to Shut Down the Institute of Peace (1:15:31) Why The Blob Hates Putin (1:22:21) George Soros’ Coup of Mongolia (1:30:57) The Blob’s Regime Change Strategy Playing Out in the US (1:42:48) How Trump Has Successfully Drained the Swamp So Far (1:54:06) What Trump Should Focus On Next Includes paid partnerships.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Institute of Peace is compared to the National Endowment for Democracy, with both accused of being "aggressively anti-peace." NGOs are described as the "stem cell of the government's central nervous system," originating with the US income tax in 1913 and becoming fronts for the CIA. These organizations allegedly serve as deniable channels for money, contacts, and guidance, influencing groups without direct US government involvement. A "donor drafter class," including figures like George Soros and Bill Gates, influences policy by drafting off the US government. George Kennan's 1948 memo, "Inauguration of Organized Political Warfare," is cited as a blueprint for American power, using NGOs to rig elections, such as in Italy. The CIA, State Department, and corporations form a "blob" to advance US interests, with NGOs acting as back channels for diplomacy and financial assistance. The Open Society Foundation is accused of synchronizing US foreign policy with its own, influencing governments and speculating on currencies. El Salvador's 30% tax on foreign funding of domestic NGOs is noted as a significant move. The US Institute of Peace is criticized for its stance on opium production in Afghanistan and alleged payments to the Taliban. The discussion touches on the historical context of NGOs, their role in regime change, and their connections to corporate interests.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The US Institute of Peace was think of it like the National Endowment for Democracy. Is George Orwell in Speaker 1: charge of naming these groups? National Endowment for Democracy subverts democracy. You know, all these peace groups are, like, aggressively anti peace. Speaker 0: You can check out these protests online. They're hilarious. It's it's people protesting in the streets so that they are not allowed to know foreign funding of their own societies. Speaker 2: Put the blindfolders on me. I'm not allowed to know whether that is funded by Speaker 0: a foreign government. How much is funding? The CIA was running a initiative to control the education space during the Cold War to stop the spread of communist sympathizing teachings and curricula. All this was repurposed against right wing populism when Trump won in 2016. I noticed, according to George Soros, the Open Society Foundation was to provide a basically a tax loophole for his kids. Nate became such a powerful force in Washington that we had to synchronize US foreign policy with the foreign policy set out by the Open Society Foundation. Speaker 1: NGOs, you hear the term all the time, and in fact, the the deeper you look into almost any news story, especially one that pertains to the destruction of Western civilization in The United States, you find something called an NGO at the bottom of the story. NGO stands for nongovernmental organization, but paradoxically, NGOs feel like a parallel government to me. You've done a lot of research on this. I don't think this topic's talked about enough, so I'm just going to stand back and let you explain what an NGO is, where they came from, and what role they occupy in the modern West. Speaker 0: Yeah. NGOs are the stem cell of the government's central nervous system. They are this highly flexible tool, just like a stem cell can transform into any of the two twenty different cell types in the human body, and they self renew, and they can generate all these new neurons. That is really You can't disentangle or really separate the government from the nongovernmental organizations. This started in its origin really with the creation of The US income tax in 1913, and then in 1917 contributions to charitable organizations, to five zero one c threes as we now know it, became tax deductible from this new income tax. And so, that gave rise to this money flow into private foundations and into nonprofit organizations that would come to play a large role in the in both World Wars, but in particular World War II, when humanitarian relief began to be a big part of OSS, and the predecessor to the CIA, and military financial assistance to groups in afflicted by World War two, and then in particular during the Marshall Plan after World War two, NGOs played a key role in being a deniable front to run money, to establish contacts, and to provide direction and guidance to groups that the US government did not want to be caught necessarily doing directly. And so you can trace this back really. You have all these Speaker 1: They were fronts, a lot of them, or at least in part. Speaker 0: So it's a complicated relationship because you have government agencies, and then you have outside high net worth individuals and families, dynastic American families, like the Fords, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, all starting these private philanthropies, all playing a role in US statecraft, all having international businesses that rely on foreign markets. And so they're highly dependent on the State Department clearing the way for them, negotiating deals for them, acquiring territory, creating export markets, maintaining laws in foreign countries that maximize profitability, securing mining rights, securing trade routes. So there's this complex interplay. This is why I always call so the story is really about I don't really think of it as a as a government being different than an NGO, as being different than this corporate financial overclass. When I used the term the blob, which is not my term, you know, that was a term from Obama's deputy national security adviser, Ben Rhodes, to describe a force within Washington that was bigger than the White House, that the Obama White House felt like it couldn't get its foreign policy done because this foreign policy establishment, this blob structure seemed to be more powerful than that. But I think of the blob as having three three levels to it. You have the the guts of it inside the government, which is the State Department, the Defense Department, the Intelligence Community, and and USAID. You can think of it, Hillary Clinton would call this the the three d model. Diplomacy, defense, and development. And then the IC plays, the CIA for example, plays a supporting role in those functions. And these are all merged together as one cohesive way of advancing US foreign policy, what we call it. But it's really advancing the interests of, generally speaking, insiders or national champions like our large multinational corporations. But bring this back, so you have this this government structure in the center of it. And then below that, you have the NGOs who are funded by the US government, and who work alongside the US government, and have a longer reach than the US government. The State Department can't just walk into certain conflict zones, and talk to the indigenous community, and get honest answers, or tell them what to do without being on the record saying something they might not want attributed to them. The NGOs can go in and do that. The NGOs can serve as the back channels for diplomacy. The NGOs can provide a plausible way of providing financial assistance, or money, or bribes to to various groups to run shipments, and arms, and to create networks of assets that that then a assistant secretary of state can then liaise with. So there's this this network creation level, and there's this influence level at the bottom. But above that above that government level is what I call the donor drafter class, which is, and you know, everyone understands the concept of big donors having a big influence on politics. Not only do they largely play the key role in in determining who's president through the funding that they provide, but they I I say donor drafter because they draft off the policies off of the US government. They don't just donate into it. Like in a bike race, you always want to be not in first. You want to be right behind the guy in first, so that the guy in first is cutting the wind for you, so that you don't suffer the cost of the the extra exertion to cut cut the wind. The Pentagon cuts the wind for companies, for multinational corporations. The State Department cuts the wind for multinational corporations and private equity funds and the whole financial overclass. The the CIA cuts the wind for corporations and financial firms. The USAID cuts the wind. And so you have these figures like George Soros, for example, and Bill Gates, who are now obviously very well renowned in the NGO world. The Open Society Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and then also, you know, Rockefeller, Carnegie Foundation, Ford Foundation, all of these. All of these have corporations and financial firms attached to their philanthropy. And when they so they will receive funding from the US government, from USAID, or their portfolio assets will, or their portfolio NGOs, or companies will. But they will also donate into it. And I bring this up because oftentimes, they are paid by the government, but oftentimes they're actually paying into a government project that advances some other interest. And I can go through a bunch of examples of this, but maybe I'll come back to the history real real quick. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: So in 1948, this was the start of the intelligence state in America. It was NSC 10 dash two authored by George Kennan, gave the CIA its plausible deniability doctrine that allowed you to that allowed the CIA to have a license to lie. The CIA came into creation I'm just take a quick look here. The CIA was created because the State Department wanted dirty deeds done without being attributed to the State Department. So they needed some outside agency which could do what what George Kennan called two months before he authored the plausible deniability doctrine in NSC 10 dash two. He called this the inauguration of organized political warfare. This is a very little known memo that was not declassified, I believe, until 02/2005. It was written in 1948. Everyone knows George Kennan as the head of the policy planning staff at the State Department, as the author of the containment strategy Yes. Russia and the Cold War. One of the most celebrated folks in US diplomacy history. But two months before granting this license to do all this, to have the CIA operate through NGOs, through civil society organizations, through private foundations, through you know, these astroturf grassroots advocacy nonprofits. He wrote this memo called the organization, the inauguration of organized political warfare. And he argues that this is now April 1948. We had just effectively rigged the nineteen forty eight Italian election. April eighteenth nineteen forty eight. We had wanted this was the first democratic election in Italy, which after World War two had ended. And we had pitted basically a pro US, pro Western democracy candidate versus a pro Soviet autocracy candidate was how how it was pitched. And the very first national security memo, one dash one, was on the central importance of Italy to The US position at the dawn of the Cold War, and that we could not afford to lose this election. And so the very first covert action of the Central Intelligence Agency, because in '19 under the 1947 act, it was largely conceived of this being an intelligence collection agency, not so much operations. The CI has two different career tracks. Right. Intelligence, you know, they call it the analyst track, and the operations track, and they're very different breeds of people. They're very, very different in what they do. One of them, you know, you collect the intelligence and you synthesize it for policymakers at the State Department, or at the White House National Security Council. Speaker 1: A lot of reading, a lot of foreign websites. Speaker 0: Yes. A lot of academics. Speaker 1: Yeah. And Speaker 0: the operations is where you get, you know, the berry seal, cocaine cowboy types, and you know, these, you know, the kind of wild folks who go in and do the dirty work to overthrow democratically elected governments, or to do Speaker 1: the So people talk about the CI, they're talking about the director of operations, really. Yeah. That's what people, in the popular imagination, that's what a CI officer is. Speaker 0: True. Although John Brennan was an analyst track his whole career, and you know, I don't know that that makes a more charitable case than the operations side, but but the fact is is Kennen writes this memo in 1948, '12 days after The US had rigged the Italian election in 1948, and that's what it was. Miles Copeland, who was one of the leaders of that from the CIA side, wrote in a biography later in his life that without CIA intervention in that election, we would have lost 60 to 40. Speaker 1: I believe I believe his son went on to play the drums in the police. Stuart Copeland. Speaker 0: Well, and and and Miles Copeland, Speaker 1: the the I think I may be getting that wrong. I Speaker 0: Well, grandson actually went on to be, I think, the manager for Sting, R e R e M, a bunch of these major bands, and then teamed up with Donald Rumsfeld in order to help do music diplomacy in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is a whole other, you know, family of secrets. Speaker 1: You probably heard about Eight Sleep. Lots of people are talking about it. It is a company with one mission, improving your sleep, and it's changing the way people do that, the way they get a good night's rest. We just got word that their team is launching a new product. It's called the Pod five. It's an original and innovative mattress cover plus a blanket that uses precision temperature control to regulate your body's sleep cycles and give you the perfect sleep, which really, really matters. It can range all the way from 55 degrees to a 10 degrees, meaning that you're covered no matter what. It's like electric blanket to the next level, but also a cooling blanket. So it makes you sleep better. Temperature has a massive effect on the way you sleep. By the way, it also detects snoring, and then it adjusts your bed position to reduce or completely stop it. So there are a lot of ladies in America who are going be grateful for this product. Everybody who works here will tell you, because they all use it, that there's no better way to be alert, productive, and happy than by sleeping well, and Eight Sleep really does help. Visit 8Sleep.com/Tucker. Use the code Tucker to get $350 off your pod five ultra. If you don't like it, you return it within a month. That won't happen. We think you'll love it, but you can if you want. 8Sleep.com/tucker. Speaker 0: What happens is is in nine in the nineteen forty eight election, the CIA, which does not it did not really have the authorization to do what it did. It was a last minute, last ditch, hail Mary effort to swing the election, and they took the assets that they had had from World War II, backing, you know, at that time, the the OSS, the the War Department, before in 1948 it changed to the Defense Department. The War Department had worked closely with the with the Vatican, with the church, as well as with mafia organizations, organized crime organize organized crime factions in Italy that were being prosecuted by Mussolini, and we were teamed up with them. They gave us access to ports, to to infrastructure, to safe houses. They were a big network, pro US network node during the during World War II, and because of their influence on unions, they allowed us to run arms, know, run transshipments of supplies, food, assistance, all of that. Just one of the reasons that the Italian mafia was protected for sixty years, a very much a cold war asset for The US. But, so the CIA achieves a successful result in April 1948, and they do so by using NGOs. They use charity fronts. They use philanthropic foundations to to funnel money and assistance in. They work through the unions and the trade labor associations, which are civil society organizations that you can consider in the NGO fold. They work through all of these charities, foundations, nonprofits, the NGO sphere, in order to run-in order to run this election rigging in 1948. So twelve days later, George Kennan writes a memo from the US State Department called the Inauguration of War and Ass Political Warfare, and everyone can look this up online. And he lays out how this is the model blueprint for the American power in the twentieth century, and that we need to overcome the basic distinction between peace and war that Americans have long believed there was, because the average American does not understand the intricacies of international relations, and if we don't if we don't seize this initiative to build an organized political warfare apparatus through this State Department intelligence function, then we will lose the American century, we'll lose the twentieth century to the Bolsheviks, or to the British, who each have their own department of dirty tricks. And so it goes on to say that this is a State Department function. Ideally it would be within a State Department bureau of political warfare, so I think what the the director of political warfare is what they wanted to call this until they decided. And in the memo he says that there are problems with this, which is that because the state department has provides a public audit of its funds, we would not be able to conceal these funds in the State Department budget. So it might be ideal to have an outside intelligence agency to to take on this function, and that's why two months later, the CIA was given the plausible deniability doctrine, and given delegated these powers by that very author, George Kennan. But at the back of this memo are fascinating exhibits of contemplated ways to structure recommendations and proposals for structuring this CIA intelligence work through NGOs. And it includes creating, for example, voluntary councils of an outside organization that would nominally look to the public like it was a grassroots organization that is helmed by fine upstanding members of the American establishment, or people in in great repute. He actually uses the line, members of the American business community of the caliber of Alan Dulles. Course, Alan Dulles was the CIA chief, but they would A Speaker 1: true criminal. Speaker 0: Right. And at the time his brother was running the state department, but and it goes on to say that it would look to the world like it's an NGO, but it would be it would receive funding from the CIA. It would receive guidance from the CIA, and it would constantly coordinate. And it was at that very year that the term NGO really became a codified term when the term nongovernmental organization was entered into the charter of the UN declaration on human rights in 1948, where the Economic and Social Council was directed to coordinate everything it did with with NGOs. And that's that's really what the sort of etymology of that term in terms of its explosions when the UN codified that term. And that's what essentially set off this NGO arms race, this proliferation of cells within American statecraft, the American business community, within the American intelligence community, the national security community, to each create their own cellular circuitry in order to advance their interests. And I can get sort of deeper into that story if you'd like, I can just take it from history there to present. But I'd feel remiss if I didn't also note that there's a government, and there's a business side of it. And the thing that I think a lot of people are missing in this story, in the attempt to take on the rogue elements of the NGOplex, is that last time we talked, I I It was right after USAID had Correct. Announced its closure. And I took what a lot of people I think thought was a somber tone on that, that I was celebrating its shutdown, but I was braced for impact about the ramifications of of this, and how it might play out. And I think I used the term that, you know, this is necessary to do this open heart surgery. We also have to ensure that the patient doesn't die on the operating table. Just because it's the right diagnosis doesn't mean, you know, you can set it and forget it. If you don't midwife the process diligently, you could kill the entire American empire. And I bring up that point here because it's not just American intelligence, and American statecraft, and you know, the State Department, the DOD, the CIA. It's also virtually every single major international corporation that we consider to be American, that is wrapped up in this NGO plex. And if you and I can go through examples of of how that manifests, but I I can't think of a single industry on that's domiciled in America, that people think of as as great American companies, that is not deeply connected to the NGOplex, and in some respects dependent on the NGOplex to secure their markets, to secure their, you know, their profitability, to secure their revenues, to to secure their interests. And while we are taking on the NGOplex, there's also this and now they're going to make their voices heard through lobbying, through pressuring Congress, and this is what we're seeing. The Congress is now looking like they're not going to codify these Doge cuts. We saw 26, I think, Republican members of Congress who are saying they're not going to approve the Doge cuts around USAID. But a lot of this is, I think to to find the solution that is politically possible, you have to understand, I guess, how the whole ecosystem works in order to provide offer solutions that might have political viability, if that if if that makes sense. Speaker 1: Of course. Of course, it does. So nongovernmental is actually a sort of misleading description because they're paragovernmental Yes. It sounds like. Speaker 0: Yes. You know, they're not Speaker 1: I mean, we're led to believe they're like, you know, doctors without borders or whatever, you know, that which I'm not against for the record, but, like, whatever the famous NGO is going into South Sudan to save people, they're acting totally independent. They're nongovernmental, but that as you just described so capably, that that's a lie. Speaker 0: Well, this sort of gets down to the stem cell concept and what type of NGO cell type you're talking about. I'll give you a couple examples. So there are these paragovernmental ones, like take for example, the Open Society Foundation. Started in 1979, according to George Soros, it was to provide a basically a tax loophole for his kids. That was the idea that he said. And then it quickly became wrapped up with the US State Department operating in all of the major Cold War hubs, especially in Eastern Europe, and fomenting the turnover of those governments so that they would break away from the Soviet Union and join join The US and Hungary, Romania, Poland, you know, the the whole the whole litany. And meanwhile, he was running the the, you know, the Quantum Fund and his George Soros management fund that was speculating on the foreign currencies of all these governments. So while he's working with the State Department, and the Central Intelligence Agency, and every US embassy, and every country in Eastern Europe, and using this foundation, this this network to influence the course of those events, so that their governments would flip. He's using his hedge fund to speculate way before anyone knows that this is this movement is even being cultivated by the State Department and by his own nonprofits. He's speculating on the the direction of those currencies. So he's got insider trading knowledge of everything that's going to happen in these countries while he's betting on it. Sort of like the Nancy Pelosi stock, you know, tracker type type of thing. But by by the nineteen nineties, the Open Society Foundation had become such a powerful force in Washington that Bill Clinton's deputy secretary of state, I think it was Strobe Talbot, who said, we think of the Open Society Foundation as being a independent, but allied partner country, like The UK, or France, or Germany. And so we work closely with the Open Society Foundation. We consider them an ally, but we have to synchronize US foreign policy with the foreign policy set out by the Open Society Foundation. This is a quote, everyone can look this up, it's it's on my timeline on X. But so this is in the nineteen nineties, this is thirty years ago at this point. US foreign policy is being synchronized with the George Soros policy recommendations, and a lot of this is because it's not just that George Soros is the largest donor to the Democrat party, and you know, Bill Clinton's obviously the Democrat president. George Soros, you know, provided two and a half times more than any other single individual to the Democrats in the last election cycle. Speaker 1: But it's that In in this, just this last election? Speaker 0: Yeah. For Joe Biden, hundred million dollars. I think the second largest was 40. That's crazy. Yeah. And although that may be the twenty twenty election actually that I'm referring to with those numbers, because I think those were the numbers in 2024 pre election. So that may have been the twenty twenty election cycle. But I'm sure it's comparable for 2024. But so the other part of it though is that the Soros Foundation so it drafts off of those policies, and I can give you some crazy examples of this. In Mongolia, it's a particularly perfect example of this, but we'll come back to that in a sec. So it's not just that Soros donates to the political candidates who's running for president, who's running for attorney general, or who's running for district attorney. It's that the Soros Foundation is also a co investor and a co sponsor in government initiatives and government projects. At USAID, you will frequently find, almost constantly find that the the Open Society Foundation is a donor into USAID initiatives, a donor into state department initiatives. And this is what you frequently see when a government agency cannot get sufficient funds allocated from Congress. They need to reach into the NGO sphere or into the private sector with multinational companies to effectively co sponsor and provide the top up capital to get the amount of money they need to run this operation. Speaker 1: That's legal? Speaker 0: Not only is Speaker 1: it Can I just fund a war if I want? Can I just like send a check to the Pentagon to buy more I mean, I can we can have privately funded government? Speaker 0: Yeah. We've had it since the Banana Wars. We've, you know, we've we've had we've had this relationship for Speaker 1: In Honduras. Speaker 0: Yeah. Honduras, Guatemala. This has been a constant feature of American statecraft, you know, almost since the beginning, which is that you have a government national security interest, or a government commercial national interest, but then you also have the profiteers of those, of that government action in the private sector, in the for profit space, and also at the NGO layer to the extent that they're getting funded to do this work, or it satisfies the the wants of the sponsors of the NGOs. So, and this is what War is a Racket was about. If, you know, the Smedley Butler nineteen thirty six, you know, book about how, you know, all of the major multinational corporations were on the take for World War I. All of them were on the take for, you know, when he's talking about how he toppled governments in South America for, you know, what was it? The City National Bank Yeah. And, you know, the the petroleum companies and United Fruit. United Fruit, and, you know, the the But may I ask, I mean, Speaker 1: yes. I mean, of course, I knew that. I read it, but I didn't understand that they are not only the beneficiaries of these policies, but also the funders of the policies. Yes. Yes. So but that the problem with that conceptually is that it puts it's all beyond Democratic control. There's no I mean, that's like there's no way to vote out, you know, whoever, George Soros or Larry Fink or whatever. There's just kind of right? Speaker 0: Right. Well, it's a tectonic plate. It's it's something that shapes the fabric of what we consider democracy to be. And it's and I think arming everyone in America with the with the knowledge of that topography can shape the kinds of democratic action that you propose. Give me an example. I mean, this was just yesterday. The nation of El Salvador announced a 30% tax on every on all foreign funding of domestic NGOs within El Salvador. This is a shot heard around the world. There have been many attempts by countries to contain the NGO plex. Speaker 1: Yeah. Most famously in Hungary. Speaker 0: Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia. Every time they've been confronted with street protests, and attempts to pressure the parliament using civil disobedience in the same sort of State Department USAID, Soros Foundation type rent a riots. We saw saw that in Slovakia, Serbia. In Hungary, when they passed their NGO transparency bill, it was blocked by the EU. The EU intervened and said that you cannot enforce this NGO transparency law because What? Yes. Yes. And they threatened to cut them off of EU funding if they Speaker 1: Hungarians aren't allowed to know where the money's coming from into their own country? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. They called it the Russian law, by the way. Speaker 1: The Russia law? Yeah. It's bad, therefore, it's Russian. Speaker 0: Well, the idea was Russia had banned USAID, had banned the National Endowment for Democracy. A few I think in 2015 around then, this was after the pussy riot incident. Yeah. You know, this is sort of a little bit pre Navalny when they when the regime change was sort of from the right wing national side, we attempted a sort of left wing, you know, left wing anti fa type coup in Russia through, you know, the whole pussy riot and associated Speaker 1: Well, wasn't like an organic artistic expression, is what you're saying? Speaker 0: I mean, you can look up online the lead singer's pictures with Tony Blinken and standing at the State Department podium, and all the National Endowment for Democracy literature on it, and the The USA just look up USAID. Speaker 1: That wasn't just like an especially empowering form of feminism. It was tactical. Speaker 0: It was tactical feminism. And and it always is with people. Speaker 1: It always is. That's right. Well, you've heard a lot of complaining in the last couple of weeks since Donald Trump announced his new import tariffs on foreign made things. A lot of people don't like it, but the companies who make American products in America with American materials, they're pretty happy because they're not affected by this. They've been doing the right thing since the beginning. They're not paying tariffs because, again, they're making American products for Americans. Liberty Safe is a perfect example. Liberty Safe is not making its stuff in some foreign country. It's not made in China or Vietnam or India. It's made right here with American steel. They employ skilled American craftsmen who do an amazing job. That's why they make the best safes there are. They have the highest standards of quality and security, you don't have to worry that when you lock up things that you really care about, they're gonna get stolen. They're not. These are safes you can trust. I keep my father's shotguns in a Liberty safe at my house. When you buy Liberty, you support American jobs. You protect what matters most. Choose American steel, American craftsmanship, choose Liberty. Visit liberty safe dot com for more. Speaker 0: But what happened was is after all this stuff, they Russia passed this, you know, basically banned, you know, foreign NGOs, or or at least banned a huge subset and required all these, you know, this transparency around it, and they banned USAID and NED. And so when Hungary and Slovakia and Serbia, and all these Eastern European countries who were in the post Soviet orbit tried to pass transparency laws so that they could get a sense of how much of their own civil society cellular body was actually foreign assets of a foreign government, this was called these were referred to as Russian laws, the Russian law, because Russia had done this. But think about this. Speaker 1: This is so insane. Speaker 0: But but think about that framing. And you see, and you can check out these protests online. They're hilarious. It's it's people protesting in the streets so that they are not allowed to know foreign funding of their own societies. Speaker 2: I demand. I will I I am not allowed to know. Put the blindfolders on me. I'm not allowed to know that whether the newspapers I read, whether the union I'm a part of, whether the lawyers association I'm a part of, whether the the private company that pay that pays my paycheck, whether the public health sector, my hospitals, whether that is funded by Speaker 0: a foreign government and how much how much is funding. And, you know, the Russians are not complaining about that because the money is not coming largely for if if the money was largely coming from the Russians, the EU and the Speaker 2: US State Department would be demanding this. We have this Speaker 0: in The United States. It's called a FARA registration, the Foreign Agents Registration Act. We consider that to be a criminal violation where you can spend five years in jail if you don't file a foreign registration. But if Hungary or Serbia or Slovakia tries to pass a a foreign agent registrations act law there, we call that an attack on democracy. Why? Because it reveals it takes the mask off of the angio plex and and and reflects and shows to the people what it really is. It is the long arm of US Intelligence. It is the long arm of US statecraft, and is the long arm of that corporate financial donor drafter class with all of their own secular private Speaker 1: If I could just interject and say, you know, what I find so infuriating is that none of this helps the America that I live in or want to live in. I mean, lot of the agenda is being pushed, not just like, you know, we want to grow our bananas in your banana favorable climate, or we want cheaper coffee, or, you know, we want your oil fields. It's like pushing stuff that is just terrible, like, awful. Like, blowing up families, attacking Christianity. It's like, why does it have to be that too? Why that agenda? Speaker 0: This is what where it gets really complicated. The idea behind this positive synergy between the corporate sponsored NGOs and the government sponsored NGOs and them all working together as a common blob was that if the if we secure American business in a country, American contracts, American rights to minerals or American rights to mines, we're boxing out the Russians and the Chinese. Speaker 1: I get it. That's not a crazy goal. Speaker 0: It's a crazy goal. It's it's and that, however, gives a license to some of the dirtiest stuff. And and this total profiteering, especially because the multinational corporations have no We're still living in Milton Friedman land, and this is something Milton Friedman was a huge influence on me as a kid. Huge, huge, huge. I watched Speaker 1: Yeah, me too. Speaker 0: All ten hours of Free to Choose. I think he's an incredibly I think he's a high integrity guy, and he means what he says, but I think he fooled a lot of conservatives with this concept of maximizing total shareholder value, which is now codified effectively, you know, into into our corporate law that you have a It's the law. It's the law. You have a statutory you have a duty Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: To maximize total shareholder value. That does not mean value for Americans. When your markets are abroad, and your labor is abroad, and your factories are abroad, but you are getting billions of dollars from the US government to advance your own private interests, and you are toppling many solid parts of the world order to do so. You're overthrowing governments. You're bribing media. You're controlling organized crime groups, and conflict zones, and the narco trafficking, all of the dirty work that goes into making the sausage in a lot of these countries. It's not trickling down, you know, per Ronald Reagan to the people that live there. These companies all got extremely rich while the heartland turned into the Rust Belt. That's right. And, you know, so to me, it's no surprise when you see that John Bolton on Piers Morgan held up his USAID hand grenade when he was the head of USAID policy and budget under Ronald Reagan. He showed this a few months ago on on Piers Morgan that his parting gift from USAID after he left running the policy and budget there, John Bolton, humanitarian assistance guy, was a was a USAID hand grenade. That's that was the parting gift they gave him, a golden hand grenade with with his name engraved in it. But that that is Speaker 1: And and what did that imply? That he was trying to blow up USAID, or that he was that they're in fact using Speaker 0: I think the the idea was that, you know, they are hard charging about it, think. But you know, what it represents to me is this development defense, you know, they call it the three d's. The develop diplomacy, defense, development. The idea that USAID is absolutely critical to US military operations. It's absolutely critical to US diplomatic operations. It's absolutely critical to US intelligence operations, which supports the diplomacy and defense. And so, you know, while you're masquerading as this humanitarian NGO sponsor, you're the embodiment of the hand grenade. And and that to me, you know, that's a that's a Reaganite philosophy that we're fighting the ghost of. This idea that to that you deserve a slot within this government apparatus, US government apparatus, when you are not representing the interests of The United States, or at least you there are no conditions on it. There's there's no bounds on it, other than you need to be in the good graces of that government. For example, the US embassy in Brasilia did nothing to stop Brazil's attack on X or Brazil's seizure of assets Exactly. Speaker 1: That's exactly right. Speaker 0: But this goes this goes back a really long time. I mean Speaker 1: Gonzaloleer is a US citizen, was murdered by the Ukrainian government, and, like, nobody said a word about it. The US Ambassador to Ukraine didn't say a word. None of the million NGOs populated by Americans in Ukraine said a word. Like, I I don't see how they're on the side of America at all. Speaker 0: Right. Right. Well, the source example is really interesting. Can I share a few anecdotes? Speaker 1: Gosh, I hope you will. Speaker 0: So when I went into the WikiLeaks archive to to look at all the State Department cables that referenced George Soros, or the Open Society Foundation, or any of its associated groups, the Open Society Institution, the Open Society Forum, I was surprised when I saw the communications in the State Department cables start in 1973, because the Open Society Foundation did not start until 1979. And when I looked at at the State Department cables, they were all related to Soros Associates, which was the the firm operated by George Soros's older brother, Paul Soros, who is, you know, according to his New York Times obituary, you know, one of the greatest titans of the ship shipping and port and infrastructure development world. And Paul Soros is all over these State Department cables in tons of countries, Gabon, Iran, remember this is pre 1970, this is, you know Speaker 1: Pre revolution, yeah. Speaker 0: Right. And so the State Department is is Oregon is working with Soros Associates, Paul Soros, in order to secure contracts for him, in order to secure favorable loan terms to foreign governments, and in order to intervene on the bidding process for port construction for lucrative port deals. Think one in Gabon was I think a I think it was like a 700,000,000 to a billion dollar port project. You know, huge money for Gabon, a project in Gabon in early nineteen seventies. And one of one of these cable State Department cables is really interesting. It's the US embassy there, and they are talking about how three senior executives from Brown and Root are going to be coming to Gabon that week, and are looking to have arrangements made to meet with, I think, the president of the country and other influential leaders in government and in civil society, and for the embassy to arrange everything from their travel to their hotel, to to introducing them to all the senior leaders in the country. And Brown and Root was working together with and on this port project, and they were bidding against other foreign, you know, infrastructure development companies from from other countries. And one of the cables basically suggests that, you know, that the embassy should relay back to Soros and and Brown and Root the the status of the bid going to them, and anything favorable that can be done to to nudge that contract going to Brown and Root and Soros. Now what's interesting about this is a few things. So this is the example of what what you were talking about, which is we're doing this because we want to stop, you know, there's a big fight over Africa with the Russians, and with the Chinese all throughout the Cold War. You know, a lot of Africa had sided with Russia, and the Russian communism was seen as an egalitarian counterweight to a sort of racist United States, and there was a big diplomacy push there. So getting Brown and Root and Soros to control the infrastructure in the country and to get those contracts and to get the proceeds and remits was advancing US interests under US national security and US national interests, which means there's a state department interest in doing favors for Soros and Brownenroot. Now Brownenroot, which would later become Halliburton, or Brownenroot is, I guess, Halliburton, I guess, acquired Brown Root. Speaker 1: Kellogg Brown and Root. Speaker 0: Yes. Right. Which of course is, you know, Dick Cheney was the, I think CEO and president. And Brown and Root in the JFK files, it was very interesting. The ones that were declassified just a few months ago by Tulsi Gabbard, they have a whole section on the CIAs, all the CIA influence nodes over over Brown and Root, and it was fascinating. I believe both Brown senior and junior held covert security clearances with the Central Intelligence Agency. There's a memo in these new unredacted JFK files, and it was a CIA internal fact check, a crisis communications, how do we respond to this new piece in Ramparts magazine called this called Brown and Roots CIA Dimensions. And you know, so this is the Houston Republican power, CIA power base. This has been the big power base of the Republican party for almost a hundred years now. This this oil Yeah. Giant oil Oil zone. Yes. Exactly. Speaker 1: So no matter how you feel about Donald Trump, it's hard to deny that his second term has been a whirlwind. It's amazing how fast this administration is advancing its agenda, putting illegal aliens, slashing government waste, an entirely new trade strategy. No one has ever seen anything like it. They are not messing around. Now many people are thrilled by this fast start, but it's gonna take a lot more than this to achieve the ultimate goal. And that's why our friends at the Heritage Foundation are mobilizing supporters, patriots across the country to support this administration and the broader conservative movement, and they need your help to do that. You can go to Heritage.org/survey to complete their national survey on Donald Trump's second term agenda. What you tell them will help their team work with the White House to make the president's campaign promises a reality. I used to work at Heritage thirty five years ago. Gave me my first job. I've always been grateful for that. Heritage is not like every other think tank in DC, almost all of which are part of the problem. Heritage is fighting the problem. I can say that. Go to heritage.org/survey to help them fill out the survey. Heritage.org/survey. Speaker 0: And so Ramparts writes this piece, and it accuses this, the CI of running this vast network through the petroleum industry, and through a web of NGOs, and trade associations all over Houston, and and it focuses on this Brown and Root network, because Brown and Root also had something called the Brown found the Brown Foundation, which was a n g, you know, a corporate sponsored NGO. And in this, they actually reveal that both Brown senior and Brown junior had covert security clearances for work with the Central Intelligence Agency. So while you have, you know, one of the world's premier infrastructure and development firms, which would later, you know, be going to work, you know, with Soros in Africa, and then would later spawn vice president Dick Cheney, and Liz Cheney who started off her career in USAID and comes from that same, you know, Halliburton Brown and Root lineage. They've direct ties all over the CIA. And I guess I bring this up to say that in addition to that, you had this web of of adjacent NGOs around around statecraft there. So for example, in that same files, again, the CIA is doing an internal fact check-in this in this memo, where they say Ramparts is accused of these people of being CIA. And it's it's a memo, think, the one of the local directors saying, are are here's here's we reviewed the files. Here's what's true and false about the Ramparts article. In one of these, they describe something called the Vernon Fund, which was a private philanthropy. Well, it was created by the Central Intelligence Agency to look to the public like a private foundation. And it was set up to fund the webs of teachers unions all throughout the world. They sponsor something called the World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession. The CIA was running a initiative at the time to control the education space during the Cold War to stop the spread of communist teachings, communist sympathizing teachings and curricula, especially in cold war conflict zones all over Europe, all over Africa, all over Latin America. And so to do that, to control, to make sure that students and young people and every person in society who comes up through the education system is ideologically aligned against communism. They had to control the teachers' unions and what was being taught, what was being promoted. And I bring this up. Again, I hate communism, but all of this was repurposed against right wing populism when Trump won in 2016. I noticed. Because instead of this same blob being threatened from its communist socialist left, it was being threatened from its populist nationalist right. But so the CIA so in this memo, the CIA says, yeah, they're right about the Vernon Fund. Ramparts is right. That was ours. We set it up to look like a private philanthropy. We recruited the daughter of the Texas governor to bundle money to the World Confederation of Organizations of the Teaching Profession in order to influence the National Education Association, and create, I think it was like 140 different trade associations that they all worked through. Now the National Education Association is the largest of of the the teaching union associations, and the World Confederation of Organizations for the Teaching Profession is still around today. It's called Education International. They rebranded the name, but it's the same organization. And by the way, in these CIA files, they explicitly say the president of the World Confederation of Organizations, the teaching profession, is has a CIA covert clearance to do this work. The the treasurer, the executive secretary. So the thing is funded by the CIA, by a NGO that was actually created by the CIA. The senior leadership of the trade association doing the work are are CIA at every part of the layer. But how many people in Education International, how many teachers in that union you think know that story? How many fifth grade teachers? How many, you know, administrators at the union level? How many people in the schools know that? So when you see Education International today come out in Germany, because it branches in every country. In Germany, Education International has come out and said, AFD, no one affiliated with AFD should be allowed to be a teacher in Germany. And and and they petitioned the German government to not allow AFD at any of the Speaker 1: You can't have a job if you vote for the party. Speaker 0: Right. But this is exactly what RCI has been calling for, because AFD has been trying to revive the Nord Stream pipeline and trying to restore relations with Russia. So from the national security, you know, side of this, there's a predicate to say, yeah. We're authorized to run this operation. But but what do you do there? Now you've got the AFT, which is the most popular party in Germany right now in polling. It's got, I think, 26%. They they doubled their their votes in the in the recent election, but since then, polling shows that they are now the most popular party in Germany. They were declared an extremist organization by their own national security state, which is effectively our national security state. We gave birth to Germany as a unified country in the nineteen nineties and midwifed its entire intelligence apparatus. The center of US intelligence in the Cold War was in Germany. And so you have this this blob interest in banning AFD. The the German government declares the most popular party in the country an extremist group. If the definition of extreme is that it is a departure from what's popular. Speaker 2: And so by its very definition, it's it's a Speaker 0: contradiction is what I'm Of getting at there. But that and thank God for Marco Rubio and senator and senator Tom Cotton, to his credit, was fantastic on this. He, you know, directing he and Tulsi Gabbard he, I think, directed Tulsi Gabbard at ODNI to threaten to not to discontinue intelligence sharing with German intelligence for this domestic surveillance, because this extremist label allowed the German government to spy on every member of the AFD as if they were Al Qaeda. And so because of US diplomatic pressure from our state department, our ODNI, our congress, Germany has temporarily put that in the enforcement of their surveillance dimension on pause. But what I'm getting at is this is this is a CI proprietary Education International who's doing active work to do exactly what the Bill Burns CIA, the John Brennan CIA wants done in Germany. And of course, who was The US Ambassador to Germ to Germany while this all played out with the Nord Stream pipeline blowing up? It was Amy Gutman, my dean at the University of Pennsylvania. You know, Amy Gutman, when I when I was there twenty years ago, she was the dean then, then she became The US Ambassador to Germany, head the state department in Germany during the Biden administration. And meanwhile, what's the University of Pennsylvania doing? It's housing the Penn Biden Center, which is this major foreign policy coordinating node at the university layer. Again, are just super NGOs. The universities will organize the international exchanges of ideas with civil society in all these foreign countries. They will produce the white papers that get picked up by the media. They will liaise with meet with government officials to advise on economic policy, don't you know, in the region. You know, this is the whole Jeffrey Sachs, Harvard Institute of International Development. Speaker 1: And it's all tax free. That's that's the part that I mean, I because you began this history of the NGO, and thank you for doing it, with reference to the tax code, the introduction of the income tax in 1913, and then the tax exempt statutes of 1917, right in the middle of first world war, not surprisingly. But, like, isn't the whole idea of it, my understanding of a five zero one c three well, I know because I ran one. The idea is that this helps America. Mhmm. We're encouraging charity. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But you're describing that are arms of the Intel community or, you know, working to increase profit to American businesses that may not actually really be American. A publicly traded company is not American. It's owned by the sovereign wealth funds of nine different you know, it's like Right. The whole thing is fake. So what in 2025 is the justification for continuing to subsidize these? Because, I mean, a tax exemption is a a subsidy. Right. In fact, someone's gotta run the government. Someone's gotta fund the patent office. If it's not you, it's going to be me. So but why should we subsidize these things? Speaker 0: They give three reasons. National security, national interest, and securing export markets. And you know, the idea is is what does America look like if we don't do this? We're in a competition right now with Huawei in the the telecom space, in the IT infrastructure space. Major state department initiatives to try to get neutral third party governments to do away with Huawei, and sign up with AT and T, or if not that, other kind of five gs light providers like like LG and Nokia Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: In in Finland and South Korea to so that at least it's not China Huawei. And there's lots of reasons given for this, But the idea is is if you can if you can get AT and T to get those contracts, well, AT and is an American company, and this will help American GDP, and this will help American And so, like a great example, this is what just happened in Syria. So there's been this big fight over this this group, the well, also, Syria has we we just lifted sanctions on Syria. Speaker 1: Yes. Last month. Speaker 0: Yes. Mohammed al Jelani, the ISIS commander turned Al Qaeda commander turned Idlib, you know, rebel moderate rebel leader, you know, who who became, you know, the de facto head of state in Syria. Speaker 1: Now meeting with the US President? Speaker 0: Yes. Meeting yes. Meeting with the US President, meeting with every every major world leader. The US just declared that we're lifting sanctions on on Syria after Syria pledged to open up its to basically use US and Western companies and contractors for its services rather than Russian or Chinese ones. So for example, one of the pledges was to use AT and T for its wireless and telecom services rather than Huawei. Speaker 1: Where are they going buy their pagers? Speaker 0: A question. Speaker 1: It's and, yeah, it goes without saying that when, you know, the State Department lobbies to allow AT and T to do your your wireless infrastructure that, you know, that we're monitoring it, of course. Speaker 0: Right. But you can see how like what would America look like if AT and T's now there's I think what, 25,000,000 people or so in in Syria. So AT and T has just secured 25,000,000 customers effectively at the at the, you know, barrel of a gun effectively with the they've drafted off of the US Defense Department who funded Yep. The paramilitaries in Syria. They've drafted off of USAID and the billions we funneled into Syria. They've drafted off of State Department diplomacy on their behalf. And you know, a great example of this is Speaker 1: Let me just say, I mean, well, I definitely don't think that the ISIS guy is in any real sense better than Bashar al Assad, you know, the ophthalmologist. That's just my opinion. I don't think that we should be friends with the ISIS guy or the Al Qaeda guy after they murdered 3,000 Americans. Like, I don't understand that. Or I do understand it, but it has nothing to do with The United States. So that bothers me. On the other hand, since we are doing that, I think it's great that AT and T is getting the contract. I don't have a problem with And it what you're describing is a pretty conventional process where the US State Department, White House, and DOD all kind of combined forces to help American business abroad. Great. In general, great. I don't like the constellation, the mushy constellation of, quote, nonprofits that operate in a very shadowy way. Like, why do we need them for this? Speaker 0: Well, let's stick with the Syria example for a second. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And go over one of the shadiest of the nonprofits, which is the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace. Speaker 1: By the way, if you fly into DC, into National Airport, Reagan National Airport, which is like the closest airport to any city in America, but it's right there, right across the river, and you come in from the North, you fly directly over the US Institute of Peace, and it's a kind of clamshell it's a beautiful building. Beautiful. It's a modern building. What's with probably the only pretty modern building in Washington, and you think to yourself, what the hell is that, and where'd they get the money? What is that? Speaker 0: Well, international peace is a funny piece, and international peace has a funny history with US intelligence work. In the JFK files, for example, in the recent declassifications, it showed a group that the CIA infiltrated and directed called the Catholic Association of International Peace, and there are all these files that show that, yes, we we have our assets in here, and they're doing this for this. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, not the Catholic Association for International Peace, but a second international peace, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, was run from 2014 to 2021 by Bill Burns. The guy who would leave Carnegie Endowment for International Peace to run the Central Intelligence Agency. What qualifies you as running the Endowment for International Peace as your very next job? You hadn't worked in government for seven years. You were cold. What were you he and he had never worked at the CIA formally. He was in the political affairs section, which according to the JFK files, 47% of every person in the in the political affairs section in 1961 was not actually working in the State Department political section. They were actually called Confidential American Sources, which is the term for CIA agents operating under diplomatic cover, saying they work for the State That's Speaker 1: still the case today. It's a joke in DC. What's your dad do? Oh, he works at the State Department. Oh, okay. Speaker 0: Yeah. People say that about me. Yeah. Speaker 1: And I Speaker 0: don't blame him for for thinking it. I mean, it's it's so pervasive, and of course, who was the head of political affairs for the Biden administration? Victoria Nuland. Yeah. You know, and who would then go on to, be on the board of the National Dialogue for Democracy, which is another group that was spun out in 1983 by the Reagan administration when they were trying to get the CIA's old powers back, but the Democrats in Congress were blocking that because of the CIA's work against the anti war faction in the Democrat party during the sixties and seventies. So in 1983 Reagan creates NED, nineteen eighty four they create the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace has had this crazy showdown with the US federal government recently, and it's an unbelievable drama that's been unfolding now for several months. So the US Institute of Peace was, you know, was chartered by Congress in 1984 in order to do it was sort of a think of it like the National Endowment for Democracy, but but more Is George Speaker 1: Orwell in charge of naming these groups? I mean, National Endowment for Democracy subverts democracy. You know, all these peace groups are, like, aggressively anti peace. So one of the easiest decisions you're gonna make this week is to make your home secure with SimpliSafe. The moment you arm your system, your family, and everything you work for is protected, and you can focus on what matters. You can leave the house without worrying that someone is going to break in and steal your stuff, violate your sanctuary, because the best security system in the country is watching. Millions of Americans use SimpliSafe and enjoy the peace of mind it creates. Now a traditional burglar alarm only goes off when someone breaks into your house. That's not good enough. Smashed a window was already in your basement. SimpliSafe prevents burglaries before they happen. It's got AI powered cameras and live professional monitoring agents, so it leaves nothing to chance. Plans start at about a dollar per day, plus a sixty day satisfaction guarantee, or you get your money back. Check it out at simplysafe.com/tucker. Go to simplysafe.com/tucker to get 50% off a new system with professional monitoring and your first month free. That's simplisafe.com/tucker. There is no safe like SimpliSafe. Speaker 0: Well, you know, the quote by the National Endowment for Democracy founder, I believe in 1986 in the New York Times, was that it was it would be terrible for groups to be seen as subsidized by the Central Intelligence Agency. We saw that happen in the 1960s, where it was revealed groups were funded by the CIA, and it caused embarrassment. That's why the endowment was created. It's literally a direct quote, saying that the endowment was created to fund the groups, that it would embarrassing for them to, for it to be publicly revealed that they got CIA funding. And of course, it was conceived in the office of Reagan's CIA, William Casey, and Raymond Green. There's a whole CIA backstory to the whole Ned thing, but in 1984, another layer of Gongo, you know. So the US Institute of Peace was set up to be to be a national down for democracy, but really focused on conflict zones, those whereas national down for democracy operates everywhere. They'll operate in, you know, very heavily in Hungary, or Brazil. Places where there's not real dark, you know, terrorist conflict, or hyperactive DOD operations, for example. So they, in those places, it's a different track of influence for the NGOs, because they're working with these communities in these. They're working with the farmers where the the coca leaves or cocaine are being grown. They're working, you they're they're working you mentioned coffee. USAID has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the coffee trade sector, and USAID does all this joint work with Starbucks, all this joint work with Keurig. They operate in conflict zones, in the drug zones in Colombia, in Peru, the Central African Republic, Sudan. And what they're doing here is, sorry, they're well, I I got distracted by the coffee thought. Sorry. What the US Institute of Peace is doing is they're building giant networks, and serving as a back channel diplomacy. They're doing fieldwork. So they are you know, if you're in Foggy Bottom or Langley, Virginia, if you wanna know what's happening on the ground in Syria, you need the people in the field to report it to you. You need either the US embassy or you need the NGOs connected to the embassy to provide the fieldwork. We wanna know what is happening economically in this region, which is the economic, you know, breadbasket that's supporting The US military operations or the mercenary troops so that we can keep them funded. We wanna keep the industry in Afghanistan going. The industry in Syria in these sections. So the US Institute of Peace will do those surveys. They'll work with the local populations. They'll build giant networks. And you know, in June 2023, the US Institute of Peace, after the Taliban took over Afghanistan, they wrote a piece called, Why the Taliban's Successful Opium Ban is bad for Afghanistan and bad for the world. And they openly called on the Taliban. Speaker 1: We're not getting enough opium. Yes. Mike, it's a problem. Speaker 0: Right. But the opium was funding the entire paramilitary network in Syria. You know, everyone says, oh, ISIS traffics and drugs. Al Qaeda traffics and drugs. Well, guess what? ISIS and Al Qaeda with the with the full backing of the Biden government just successfully overthrew the Biden administration's top enemy in the region and now have opened up all their markets to Chevron and AT and T. And what I'm saying is is they were openly this same group that is working with these Taliban networks and these Afghan special forces, and is deeply, deeply involved in Syria is openly calling, and and this is not that they got busted paying these Taliban officials when when Trump tried to assert control over The US ensued peace, because it's chartered by Congress. It has 15 members of its board. Three of them are mandatory. The secretary of state, the secretary of defense, and the president of the National Defense University are three reserved spots. So think about this. This is the US Institute of Peace, but required on the board is the secretary of war, the the head of the the War Institute, and the secretary of state. And then there are 12 political appointee spots. Now the Trump administration tried to assert control over the US Institute of Peace as it is statutorily entitled to do, and the response from the US Institute of Peace was to barricade the doors to delete, Doge said, a terabyte worth of financial data, which Doge says it recovered and showed payments to those very Taliban networks that they were saying, keep the drugs flowing. And so evidently, according to to the Doge team, they found weapons caches inside, like a like a full military, you Speaker 1: know They found weapons inside the Institute of Peace? Speaker 0: That was what Doge reported as they said Speaker 1: Well, back to Orwell now. Right. Right. The peace people are stockpiling weapons. Speaker 0: But recently, so this has gone through the courts because, you know, the whole blob resistance has been trying to stop all these shutdowns at every layer. The outside general counsel for the US Institute of Peace has he has been the the outside general counsel for since 1986, just two years. So he so the guy in in who's the head lawyer there has been the head lawyer there since just two years after it was founded, since the since the mid nineteen eighties. So has been, you know, midwifing the the legal dark dark arts of this thing since almost the day it was born. And he's the one who I believe has spearheaded or been leading this this lawsuit to stop the the federal government's because the because the Trump administration cleared the board. The US Institute Peace would not even allow the Trump appointed board members, or its president, to even go in the building. That's why the federal police had to the FBI had to come in and in but what happened was is that same lawyer also happens to represent the Wireless Trade Association in in The US, AT And T and that whole network. So while they are working for regime change in Syria, while the US Institute of Peace is taking US taxpayer money, 55,000,000 a year, to build up this network of paramilitary groups and, you know, all these economic assistance programs and midwifing the political negotiations of and creating a unified cohesive block against the the Assad government in Syria with US US and Sud peace funds, the same lawyer who's who's now successfully sued because judge Beryl Howe blocked the Trump administration's attempt now. Now we're back to square one with that. He simultaneously is representing the wireless trade association where Syria just, you know, turned over its IT infrastructure to AT and T. So I mean, just think about that. You've got you've got the US Institute of Peace organizing this regime change in Syria, including using, you know, these narco traffic drugs while calling for the narco networks to keep going. And simultaneously, the, you know, the senior executives effectively I know he's senior he's out top outside counsel, but the senior executives effectively are representing the companies that are the direct beneficiaries of this regime change action. So it doesn't matter if it's good for US national security or US national interest to to topple Bashar al Assad, because they have a fundamentally unique and singular benefit, whether it's good for us or not, which is that they get rich from it. Speaker 1: I remember reading about the fascists, and one of the one of the criticisms that I thought really resonated was they eliminated the difference between the state, and, you know, they were they were socialists, truly, and in Germany and in Italy, and there was was you couldn't tell where the German government ended and Krupp's began, and you know what I mean? And that's bad. Yes. I thought it was bad then, I think it's bad now, and I hate to see it happen here. Speaker 0: Well, it's funny you say that, because last week at the Council on Foreign Relations, I think the panel was titled Reflections on the Post Soviet Era and Implications for the Modern Day. It's Council on Foreign Relations. And one of the questions asked the panelists directly was, there was a deep state in Russia in the nineteen nineties, these oligarchs. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And we lost control over Russia. They're basically analogizing Trump to Putin, and they're saying, we had we had all this control. We had total control over Russia during the Boris Yeltsin period, and we had all these relationships with the Russian oligarchs. But then Putin had a natural advantage as being the head of state, was somehow able to take over the Russian deep state, and then we lost control over Russia. Speaker 1: This is right. This is like the heart of it that nobody ever says. It's Putin's decision to decapitate the oligarchy. That's the reason they hate him. Speaker 0: Well, what they say is that he also co opted it and got the oligarchy working for him rather than for Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 0: Outside. Speaker 1: And in the meantime, the Russian economy recovered and life expectancy went up and alcoholism went down and, like, it became a beautiful country. The oligarchy wasn't serving Russia. That's kind of the point. Speaker 0: Well, the and the punchline to this is at the end of setting this question up, the the guy at Council of Foreign Relations asked, so with those lessons given that that's what happened with Putin, how can we preserve the deep state against Trump to save so that the deep state can save us? Is sick. And Speaker 1: This is sick. Speaker 0: But again, look at, like, you know, Chubay's and the Russian oligarchs that were working directly with the with USAID Oh, yeah. And the Harvard Institute for International Development, and it's the same thing with with Brown Root, that story of Brown and Root and Soros in in Gabon in the nineteen seventies. It was the same thing in Russia there where where we justified because it was in US national security and and national interest to make Russia a democracy and to privatize all their state owned assets. USAID paid a half a billion dollars to the Harvard Institute for International Development. Again, another one of these universities that's delegated by the US government to go deeper into Russian society than the US government was wanted to be seen doing. Very clever name. Right? US Agency for International Development pays the Harvard Institute for International Development. It's just a Harvard spawn of USAID. In order to work with Tubei's and all these, you know, Russian oligarchs, so that the Russian oligarchs got rich selling at discount bargain basement prices, all these Russian state held assets Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: In noncompetitive bids where only two outside bidders were allowed to participate. The Harvard Management Fund for the Harvard Endowment and the George Soros Quantum Fund. Speaker 1: So it's just looting. It's looting. And by the way, it it really the country I mean, look at the numbers. Like, the life expectancy for men in Russia in, you know, 1996 was, like, 55. I mean, it was it was awful awful to do that to people. Like, what did your average Russian do wrong? You know, they lived through seventy years of communism, and this is what you do to them once they're quote liberated. It's like, it's really a moral crime. Speaker 0: And and part of that issue is is Mhmm. As they were driving our own country on a similar path Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: They expressed the exact same contempt that someone would try to do something to stop it. And the other thing is is they fully acknowledged it was a deep state before Putin. They were just mad that they lost control of the deep state, which is why they were so why a lot of these actions by the the early Trump administration have terrified them around co opting parts of the business community. Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: They hate, for example, Elon Musk. They made this whole campaign to drive Elon, you know, away, or to go after Tesla. They the reaction to Jeff Bezos, for example, and, you know, his posture around reorienting the Washington Post and sort of the Bill Crystal class was apoplectic that these commercial drivers in the sort of business community, but really these are this is the the private for profit sector that they would go along with Trump's foreign policy agenda, with Trump's reforms, maybe to be in Trump's good graces, but the fact is is that that state, which was such a powerful asset to them, they do not want that handed off to somebody who might oppose them. The same reason that they didn't want Matt Gaetz at the Justice Department. They weaponized that Justice Department under Merrick Garland. They don't want that baton handed off to someone else. It's not that they have a problem with corruption at the Justice Department. They want a monopoly on that corruption. Speaker 1: So you're describing the mobilization of, you know, all the various arms of the US government, but the NGO community against Russia, and I thought you made a really, really wise observation that too few make that Putin's original sin wasn't really lusting after Poland. That's a lie. It was kicking out the oligarchs and taking control of his own country, which a lot of people hated in the West. So here's the part where I feel like the NGOs destabilized The United States. Like, the war against Russia has been waged for over ten years now, really by the NGOs. Speaker 0: Yes. Completely. And they were, you know, as we discussed, they authorized, deputized to do that. We talked about the Harvard, the Harvard Endowment, the Harvard Institute for International Development by the Open Society Foundation, which was simultaneously doing its civil society work, funding scientists, funding universities, funding the intellectual class, funding the students, and then simultaneously Soros is operating a hedge fund that is buying up the assets of the Russian government. Speaker 1: And, you know So believable. Of the failed Soviet state. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. And this relationship is I mentioned to you just now that there's a funny story about Soros in Mongolia, and the State Department in Mongolia that is like almost the the perfect encapsulation of this to to see how this plays out in every country, whether whether it's Russia, or whether it's Poland, or whether it's Hungary, or you name it. But Mongolia had discovered in the early two thousands the world's largest copper mine. It's called the Uyo Tuigal Mine. And this was by far the biggest mine ever discovered in Mongolia. It was the biggest mine in the world, primarily copper, some gold too. And a company called Ivanhoe went into negotiate a deal for the rights over that mine in tandem with Mongolian government. And the The US so I found this in a State Department cable looking up all the Soros and Open Society Foundation things, because I believe the cable is from 02/2007. And it describes how this deal is it could yield billions of billions of dollars, and would could massively transform the entire Mongolian Mongolian economy. It could like double their entire GDP with a single mine. And how there was an interest in making sure that this mine was acquired by Western companies rather than Chinese or Russians. And in the context of this, the State Department references the in the open a pivotal Open Society Foundation Mongolia memo that had caught fire in the Mongolian press, and was weighing heavily on public conversation about whether or not the Mongolian government would sign this deal with with Ivanhoe, with with this with the with the company for this. And the Soros Foundation writes, and the State Department backs this in this cable. They basically say, yes, this is all correct. We should be done to slow the Basically, the Mongolian government wanted deal terms and was about to pass something hastily in parliament to secure a deal that the Open Society Foundation said was too extractive on behalf of the Mongolian government. That basically, the the Mongolian government had problems with corruption. They also mentioned that the deal might have environmental impact in terms of the the the mine and and its environmental impact on the ecosystem of Mongolia. And they they give seven reasons in this memo that that the Mongolian parliament should not has to be stopped from from doing this this deal on these terms. So this is a Speaker 1: Can I ask, the mine is in Mongolia? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It's in Mongolia. Speaker 1: And the Mongolian parliament is the Mongolian government. So George Soros, who's from Hungary but has British and American citizenship, is telling the Mongolians they shouldn't be able to do what they want with their own mine. Speaker 0: Maybe I'll start with the punchline first to make it way more I Speaker 1: mean, it's so. The presumption there is a bit much. Speaker 0: The punchline is in 02/2009, George Soros the George Soros Management Fund purchased an absolutely huge stake in that very company. Speaker 1: Come on. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. It changed its name to Rio Tinto, but it was called Ivanhoe while it was negotiating this this deal. Now, the Open Society Foundation, they published an 174 page document, which went through everything they did inside of Mongolia to kill the the to kill the deal in 02/2007. And what they described is that they networked with all these Mongolian members of parliament. They used their media NGO, their, you know, their their nonprofit organizations, advocacy groups, their their their environmental NGOs to argue that the deal should be killed on environmental grounds. And this culminated in sort the Soros Foundation takes credit for its spawning street protests that destabilize the Mongolian government and incentivize parliament the parliament to not not ink this deal. And again, the Soros Foundation logic was that it was too extractive on the part of the Mongolian government. The Mongolian government was getting too good a deal Yeah. From this. On their Speaker 1: own mind. Mhmm. In their country. Speaker 0: Yes. In their country. And George Soros Speaker 1: didn't own enough of it. Speaker 0: So so the US embassy in Mongolia is working with the Soros network. Now they're doing it on national interest, national security grounds. They're saying, hey, if a western company doesn't get this, China's right next door to Mongolia. They're big in the minerals, the metal space. We don't want to lose this mine, the biggest copper mine in the world to a Chinese competitor. We want to make sure our westerner gets this deal. But the Open Society Foundation, which is underneath the now it's the nonprofit side of the Soros Management Fund. The Open Society Foundation is saying, hey, Kill this deal because the company is not getting enough money out of this. Speaker 2: And then as soon as they kill that and get more profit secured for the the mining company, the Soros management fund buys up the equity way before everybody else. You can read about this in Speaker 0: in the This is that no matter what happened with the mine, he he would have, like, doubled his profit. I think it went from 9¢ to 17¢ before a deal was even inked or be before they even got to one of the development stages of it, simply because everybody else hearing the news about this rushed into it. But Soros had already bought up the stock because his own NGOs were on the ground midwifing the entire process with the full force and credit of the US government driving. Speaker 1: This is gonna happen in Ukraine, isn't it? Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sure it's happened all the Speaker 1: rebuilt the Ukraine Rebuilding Fund from BlackRock. I mean, this is so if I want a piece of the trillion dollars that's gonna be spent to make Ukraine a country again and to, you know, and and a piece of its resources, which are substantial, then I'm probably gonna use NGOs on my behalf. Right? Speaker 0: Yes. And this is where you get this curious line around Gongos, government organized NGOs, and Ongos, I guess, you know, these oligarch organized NGOs, and where they all sort of meet in the middle. And where they meet in the middle is I guess what we just call politics. The the topography of political factions in The US. In the sense that every major company has an interest in sponsoring NGOs that regardless of whether they believe in the mission of it, they advance something that helps that the business side of this. So I mentioned Brown and Root had the Brown Foundation. And the, you know, the Soros Management Fund has the Open Society Foundation. And you know, Microsoft has the, you know, the the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. No. But the last one was was a little bit tongue in cheek. But what what I'm getting at here is, like, take the example of this Mongolia mine. They the Soros didn't care about the environmental impact of that Mongolia mine. The fact that they could astroturf environmental protesters to take to the streets and to create a human rights predicate as to why the international community should intervene to stop the Mongolian government from signing this deal. Ugh. Was simply an NGO work. It was simply an. Now if the US government did that, that would have to come straight from the CI. That's gonna be a covert action if you're going to run through Speaker 1: Oh, exactly. Speaker 0: Front groups. But if you have an ostensibly public one, but you're not seeing the classified state department cables or whatever's CI underneath that making an argument from their Asia Desk. Well, this is going to help US national security because that's less minerals for China. But then Soros is using that money and sponsoring Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. So the real fear though is that that could happen inside our borders. Yes. That this combination of, you know, government actors, strict strict government actors from the executive branch agencies and NGOs collude to like take down a president. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's exactly Speaker 1: they Well, that's correct. Right? So they staged a little Mongolia right here in The US. Speaker 0: Yes. And they're all the same groups. They're all the same groups. And a great example of this, we are talking about the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace, we we talked about it in the context of Syria Yeah. And how they were openly funding the Taliban, and lobbying the Taliban to keep 95% of the world's opium flowing after the Taliban took over. Speaker 1: You know how high heroin prices would go if they shut that down? I mean, see their point. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. Good point. Yeah. More for the rest of Speaker 1: it. Unbelievable. Speaker 0: They so so they are involved in these astroturf NGO rent to riots very heavily. If you go to the publications page Speaker 1: The Institute of Peace. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. US Institute of Peace. Now you have to understand, they have a term for this. Get ready for it. Nonviolent action. That's the term. Now if you have to say that you're nonviolent, you're Speaker 1: probably a little Speaker 2: bit you know, I'm not like non violently drinking this water right now. Speaker 1: No. No. You're not. Speaker 0: But you have to understand where this came. So this came from the same military network. We talked about how the origin point for this was 1948. UN declaration of human rights forbids military conquest, and mil territorial accession by military force. UN declaration of human rights the UN charter that 1948 establishes the NGO framework at the international level, intergovernmentally. 1948 is also when the the CIA inaugurates organized political warfare through the use of NGOs. But right at this time, you have sorry. One second. I just I had a second thought that just just crapped crapped up on this. We were talking about The US and Soups piece. So right at this time, you have this move from direct military force to topple governments through military coups, or through military takeovers, or through getting military defectors to serve a top down attempt to induce regime change. They created a blueprint. This is the famous color revolution blueprint, the people powered revolution, you know, lots of lots of names for this, which is which is the bottom up method. Which instead of getting at the military level with tanks and guns and fighter jets, you do it at the paramilitary street level. You shut down the country by getting a critical mass of its civil society organizations to not cooperate with that government. So the government can't bring any can't bring in any revenue. They can't pay their own police officers or members of the military to quell the riots because there's no money in the government coffers, because they'll be sanctioned by the international community for cracking down on the protesters, and because the country itself is not the hospital workers have walked out. The the public health industry workers have have walked out. So even the schools aren't open. The hospitals aren't open. The roads are being blockaded. The only way to get rid of these people is either with hundreds of thousands of police officers in every region to drag them or to kill them, in which case you have the human rights violations, and then every person is kicked off the SWIFT system, and the international finance system, and sanctions, and threats of, know, threats of a military intervention at that point. So this was pioneered by the US military. This paramilitary street technique that they call nonviolent action. And this was done through through Gene Sharp at the and his cohorts. It was at the Harvard CIA incidentally, the Harvard Center for International Affairs. It's a very cute, cute, cute nickname. But it was Henry Kissinger was there, recruited Gene Sharp. They got $50,000,000 in Pentagon funding to develop a the playbook that they now call from dictatorship to democracy. The idea that you can use mass NGO action to organize the unions, the trade workers, the laborers, the media organizations, the every aspect of civil society in order to encircle the government to cut it off from its own sources of power, and then with the with the sitting government effectively paraplegic quadriplegic, basically cut off from its arms and legs, it would be ousted by a street protest that effectively surrounds the capital and takes over takes over the buildings. I mean, is basically, it's a January 6 blueprint if what they said about January 6 was actually true, which of course is not. But you know, everyone can watch Bringing Down a Dictator, the PBS documentary about the State Department and US Institute of Peace. Their work getting the Oprah movement in Yugoslavia to topple Slobodan Milosevic. That was nonviolent action is what they call it. Now, the ending scene of that documentary, you hear the whole documentary. This is nonviolent action, nonviolent action. The climax of of the documentary, which has, you know, soaring violins as if this is this is an amazing, you know, amazing thing is the Parliament Building, you know, the capital building in in Serbia being being set on fire. Its windows smashed, and a throng of hundreds of thousands of angry street protesters flooding into the building and declaring themselves the new government. This is cheered on by the State Department, USAID, the US Institute of Peace. The US Institute of Peace was actually on the ground training them. And and meanwhile, the narrator, Martin Sheen is the narrator in this documentary, and he goes on to say, it's it's all about nonviolent action. It's it's and he says, and the that's outpour wears all black. They have they have tight leather. They have they have a clenched fist as their as their symbol. It is all intentionally sinister. You know? And it's like intentionally sinister, Molotov cocktails and police cars, setting the Capitol Building on fire, breaking the glass, forcing the the democratically elected president to flee by hell of ack out of the country. This is what they call nonviolent action. And just again, nonviolent action just means mob violence action. But to them, that is less violent than bombing Sarajevo for Speaker 1: do you understand? They're saying it's like it it's mostly peaceful. Speaker 0: Yes. Mostly peaceful arson, mostly peaceful. So so, I Speaker 1: mean, you're describing Black Lives Matter. Yes. It's kinda weird. I'm listening to this. I'm like, if Black Lives Matter was not a synthetic group, if it wasn't Astroturf, what happened to it? It disappeared as soon as its usefulness ended. Speaker 0: Well, that's that's exactly what happened. And I can talk all about the connections of this network to that, which is Speaker 1: But I mean, it's the same and I remember Darren Beatty saying at the very beginning of that, this is a color revolution, and I love and respect Darren, and I'm but I didn't quite fully appreciate how true that was. Speaker 0: No. It's literally the exact same network. I have all of Speaker 2: their planning documents from starting two weeks, Speaker 0: you know, after the riots popped off, we can get into that that whole thing with the transition integrity project, and the US Institute of Peace program on nonviolent action. Oh, incidentally, that's a Speaker 1: They were involved in that too? Speaker 0: Yes. And the International Center for Nonviolent Conflict was a big part of these, you know, how to leverage the BLM protests to shut the country down in case Trump won the twenty twenty election on election day twenty twenty. This is they also work through the union groups, especially the AFL CIO, which is the the top CIA conduit in the union space around the world. Leftists in the nineteen sixties used to call it the AFL CIA. Remember the AFL CIO had a secret agreement with the Chamber of Commerce about protests to shut down the country. This is published in Time Magazine by Molly Ball. But on this US Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Talk about the uni party. When labor and management are both colluding against you, you know. Right. But the The chamber of commerce. I mean, it really is everything is the final scene in animal farm when the pigs and the farmers are indistinguishable from each other. It's like that's the deep truth. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Both of them were threatened by Trump's foreign policy. The unions get hundreds of millions of dollars from the state department, from USAID. We have a whole we have multiple bureaus just for funding them. The Department of Labor is an international affairs bureau. We spent $20,000,000 funding unions in 2023 alone in Brazil, the AFL CIO's union groups. In just one country in one year, twenty million dollars to the union groups there. Speaker 1: Weird there was an election that year. Speaker 0: Yeah. Weird there. And and it was specifically for for labor for for mobilization of the unions and organize help them better organize themselves. Do you remember that Lula was the head of the workers party? Yeah. Remember who broke him out of jail? It was the AFL CIO. Who did the AFL CIO name the man of the year? I think it was in 2021 or 2022. They named Lula the man of the year. And what is the AFL CIO? Or it's not only was it, you know, directly sponsored by the Central Intelligence Agency for thirty years during the Cold War, but now they don't even need that because they have the CIA spinoff, National Endowment for Democracy, which has its own union branch called the Solidarity Center. The Solidarity Center is a formal part of AFL CIO. It is inseparable from it, and the Solidarity Center kicks them kicks them money. So what I'm saying is the Chamber of Commerce was threatened by a potential abandonment of of cutting the wind for them, of Trump doing, you know, liberal interventions, military interventions, humanitarian interventions in every country on God's green earth, we would just go in, replace the government, and then what would happen to AT and T if they couldn't get those contracts? What would happen to Amex if we didn't have you know, USAID's Dia app in Ukraine? Or I'm sorry, think it's Visa. So that Visa gets all the credit card processing for all the transactions there. What would happen, you know, to to Starbucks if we abandon the USAID coffee programs in Peru and Colombia and the Central African Republic? What would happen, you know, to the petroleum companies if we didn't, you know, militarily step up our presence to so the Chamber of Commerce and the unions, labor and management had a common enemy common enemy the same way Democrats and Republicans did when Trump first came on the scene because anyone who wants to put America First is going to run straight into everyone who wants to put their own interests first, America be damned. Speaker 1: And nicely nicely put. So let's end by well, I hope you will end by explaining if you were to, I don't know, defang these groups, drain the swamp, as we say, who would you go after first, and how would you do it? To restore democracy to the country, the premise that the people rule, that elections matter, that there's the change people want when they get a new leader, that is democracy. Speaker 0: There's three layers of it. There's the executive branch layer, the legislative, and the judicial. On the executive branch layer, an unbelievable amount of positive accomplishments have been done through the executive branch. And I think that the the the Trump admin deserves credit, even as we're unsatisfied with how big this is, and how many problems there have been with Congress, and judges blocking things. It took a lot of political capital to do what they did, and they were aggressive at almost every layer of it with some very big asterisks and exceptions. The idea of The firing of 14,000 people at USAID, the closure of the offices, the funding pauses was absolutely massive. Both symbolically and in very, very real terms. The restructuring that Marco Rubio has led at the State Department is absolutely massive. Like a 35 sub agencies are being riffed, know, totally killed. You know, the reduction in force totally laid off so that you don't even need the congressional approval because the there's no job for fire people to go back to because the division doesn't exist anymore. Those include the democracy rights and government the democracy rights and labor bureau at the State Department, which is the number one coordinating web, I guess, in tandem with the International Organization Bureau. But democracy rights and labor is the like the main place at state for the NGOplex. Because they're all getting this funding, and they're all coordinating with the State Department, getting the protection of the State Department because they are promoting democracy as the State Department wants them to do. The rights in it stands for human rights because you know, human rights violations in foreign countries, and then labor is, know, the unions and the and this is where you get the rental riots and all this. And you can go online and see weeping videos from people from the Democracy Rights and Labor Bureau that they've been working there for fifteen, twenty years, and suddenly it's gone, and it is going to have a devastating of course, it never has a devastating impact on these things. I mean, great example is the AP ran a ran a story about I think the initial title for it was Trump's Move to End US AID Crushes Cocaine Programs Dedicated combating the cocaine trade, and they the article is the biggest self owned you'll ever read. It's all about how, you know, we have all this money that goes to Colombia and to Peru and to Bolivia to to stop the cocaine, to stop stop drug trafficking in the you know, Colombia's number one, Peru's number two, biggest coca leave, you know, cultivation on in the world. Goes on to say, we spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year to Cocaine is going to flourish. Then they have a statement that they include, because they reached out to the president of Columbia. President of Columbia says, we're thrilled that USAID is gone. Speaker 2: They, you know, they they they made the problem worse. Then they they they go to Peru, and the number two, know, Coke Coke sorry, Cokoliv cultivator. And they said that Speaker 0: the Columbia the Peruvian government refused to comment, but we talked to the former head of the National Commission on, you know, narcotics prevention, the, you know, the former head of the part of the Peruvian government that handles this. And he said, you know, thank God the USAID programs are are on on combating cocaine here are gone. They were the primary problem in this whole thing. Actually, the, and he and he he gives an example. He says, actually, not only did none of the money actually ever reach the groups, but they only slowed down action that the Peruvian government tried to do. When when the Peruvian government tried to do something to Speaker 2: stop cocaine, USAID would step in and they would delay things, they would drag things. It's almost like Speaker 0: they wanted cocaine. And then Speaker 2: he gives the example of these he says, and in in Bolivia right next door, Bolivia banned USAID in 2013, and they drastically reduced the the the cocaine trafficking and because there was no USA Cocaine program keeping the cocaine flowing. And so anyway, but what Speaker 0: what I'm saying is this is all done through these, you know, these state department bureaus, which are now being reorganized. And one of the so at the executive branch level, I would say there's huge wins at the National Science Foundation, which is a major, you know, NGO and university sponsor for this. Yeah. A couple of big misses though. How the National Endowment for Democracy remains fully funded. They were talking a big talk, the Trump administration, about defunding the National Endowment for Democracy, which I would say is one of, if not the worst of the worst offender in this entire space, especially with Damon Wilson at the helm, who came straight from the Atlanta Council Digital Forensics Research Lab, which was the censorship supercenter of the Western world. Seven CIA directors on the Atlantic Council's board funded by the Pentagon State Department and USAID. The Atlantic Council where he came from at that time, the Atlantic Council was running training seminars to get journalists to flag Trump tweets, including one seminar called I Call Bullshit, where the Atlanta Council Digital Forensics Research Lab with where Damon Wilson was the head, they are training schools of journalists holding up Trump tweets on a on Jumbotron that says two words, witch hunt. This is two this is one month before the Mueller hearing, so Russiagate was at its apex. They wanted to censor or call disinformation Trump's attempt to present his own case around Russiagate, and they provoked journalists to hold up Atlantic Council sponsored placards with the word bullshit on it, and that means sponsored by you and me because we pay for them through 11 different government agencies. Pay the Atlantic Speaker 1: So why are they why why is NED, National Network of Democracy Atlanta Council, why are they still getting government money? Speaker 0: I'm not privy to those internal conversations. I have actually seen the IR so there's four cores at at NED. There's the two political branches, NDI for the Democrats and National Democratic Institute, IRI for the Republicans, the International Speaker 1: McCain ran for years. Speaker 0: Yep. McCain ran. Mitt Romney's on the board. Madeleine Albright, by the way, was the head of NDI. Hunter Biden was on the chairman's advisory board of NDI. Nina Jankovic was at NDI. But the so those are the two political branches. The and then there are the other two core fours are the exact other two groups who signed that secret agreement around organizing destabilizing street protests in case Trump won. The third one is called the Center for International Private Enterprise, CPE. That's the US Chamber of Commerce branch of NED. And the fourth one is called the Solidarity Center. That's the AFLCI union arm of So what do you know? The never Trump Republicans, the Democrats, the Chamber of Commerce, and the unions, the exact group behind the transition integrity project, which explicitly plotted in the height of the George Floyd riots, ran a war game about how the Biden campaign, in case Trump won in a clear win scenario clear Trump win was the name of their scenario. Scenario three is in June 2020. How the Biden campaign could get racial justice activists from these riots to be, quote, receptive to a Biden call to take to the streets and plotted what needed to be done to resource them and to cultivate relationships with Black Lives Matter's senior leadership and community leaders so that they would owe the Biden administration favors in case they need to be called on. And lo and behold, who's facing 50,000,000,000 billion dollars? The chamber of commerce then flooded them with $50,000,000,000 in contributions. Do you remember that? All the different Chamber of Commerce companies just flooded billions of dollars of donations to BLM. Speaker 1: To destroy our country. Speaker 0: Yes. I mean, while the AFL CIO and SEIU were all on the streets with them, just like they are around the world when we want riots in Georgia. We want riots in Serbia. We want riots in Hungary. We go straight to the AFL CIO branch. And but those are the four corners of Ned are the exact four corners of the effective insurrection against Trump during turmoil. Speaker 1: I don't understand how that can remain. Speaker 0: I know IRI has made reforms. Let me say this to their credit. In full disclosure, they have reached out to me, and I think I've mentioned this publicly before, but I haven't really been able to say all that much because it's just doesn't really come up much. And I have seen them attempt to make reform. This is the Republican side of it. And I've heard from folks around its senior leadership that they that they've recognized how elements of what they were doing before were inappropriate. They'd gone rogue. That certain people who were there are not there anymore, that they're trying to align their actions with the foreign policy set by their sponsors, the US government. And I've seen, and I have seen genuine good faith efforts. Speaker 1: They're trying to participate in democracy now. Speaker 0: Look, I'm not weighing into whether or not they're doing it for cynical self serving reasons, what. But frankly, you could argue they may have been doing the other, the bad stuff, or because the Biden administration wanted them, you know, to do that, or because the, you know, Trump was on shaky ground in his own first term, and didn't really control his own congress, or or budget, had a very strong coalition. But the point is is NDI has not made those not made those reforms at all. The the Solidarity Center has not made those reforms. And the issue is is if you if you say, okay, IRI has reformed, the Republican branch of it has, but these other three are still rogue. Well then, what happens, the whole purpose of Ned is that it's bipartisan, and that it therefore sort of synchronizes US policy, US foreign policy on both sides of the political aisle, because everyone's on the take. So everyone has a reason I get it. To invade Ukraine. Everyone has a reason to topple the side. But if only if IRI reforms, but NDI doesn't, what happens to Ned? Do you see what I say? Speaker 1: I do. What I this is my last question, but and you you will know the answer. So when I hear you talk, it's like it's my childhood. You know, I just grew up around this stuff, and, you know, pre '91, the assumption was we're locked in an existential struggle with the forces of darkness, the Soviets on board with that. Post '91, you know, ultimately, we came to realize that we run the entire world, and that's like a huge management project to keep everything under control and sort of moving in the right direction. But, you know, we're in charge of the world. Post 2023, there's, like, there's no way you can tell yourself that. It's just not true. And the BRICS is now it represents a bigger economy, bigger population, bigger military than the West. So I guess my question is, do the people running all these different groups understand that their nineteen eighties era assumptions are just, like, overtaken by events? Do they see the world clearly? Do they know the limits to their own power? Do they know what's up? Speaker 0: I think they do actually. Good. As I mentioned, I'm reading Bill Burns's autobiograph, the CIA director for Biden. Speaker 1: Very close friend of Epstein's, by the way. No. No. Just just a fact. Yes. I know. I just saw just saw emails from Epstein to him. Someone showed me. Doesn't I think Bill Burns is a very smart guy, and I'm not for Bill Burns, but I'm not I'm just saying, he's a friend of Epstein's. Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. But I think there is recognition of that. And I think this is also why you see this everything is alliance based, and why you see, for example, the Biden administration moving so deeply in tandem with the EU on all things. And using EU regulatory action to box out, you know, populace. The Biden administration was totally behind the EU digital censorship act that is going to become Completely. Yes. Literally, I I think their internal documents from their White House information integrity working group planning the whole thing, as well as The USA programs to to beef up the terms of it so that it can be used against domestic enemies in America. But the fact is is I think this is this is part of the global alliance structure, and I I actually don't think that the Biden administration really moved unilaterally assuming unipolar power. Almost almost every major foreign policy decision, you know, would would have the buy in of The UK, France, the in power parties in Germany and Canada, and paid very close attention to to and and and in fact, you know, partnering with in many many ways China. I mean, Trump blocked China from being able to import oil and gas from Iran. Blocked that for four years. Two months into Biden's term, China inked the Iran deal for 400,000,000,000 by $400,000,000,000 of oil and gas from Iran. It's just I So I don't think there is a kind of as much of the unipolar There is some of it, definitely. Like you hear the John Bolton types, you know, talk about, you know, almost presupposing that we can just bully everyone around. But I think even that is done with an expectation that it's going to be NATO wide. It's going to have, you know, allies around the world. But but I To your point, I think that the Ukraine, Russia war, and you know, has been a humbling period, which I think is why there actually is an appetite for peace. Even within many aspects of the blob, they just want peace on terms that are beyond their leverage to obtain. And that is a war of attrition that you know, gets back to the the efforts to cut USAID and the NGOplex. USAID spent $15,000,000,000. I think it was one year alone on on Ukraine on this. The USAID NGOs are are funding the pensions of people in Ukraine, are are are funding the the salaries of municipal workers. There's more welfare for people in Ukraine from USAID than, you know, effectively American citizens who live here legally. And but the fact is is if that USAID spigot gets cut, things will go south very quickly. This is why the EU is creating its own army. Know, built a trillion dollar budget that they've announced that for the EU to, you know, effectively create a parallel NATO in case Trump gets out of that. But in the heat of this, you know, I mentioned a few of the failings. One of them, Ned. Another one is a trillion dollar Pentagon budget is hard for me to imagine that that does not go to prolonging the war, but the Trump administration is a tough choice. If you totally deprive Ukraine of the lifeline that they've had, everything crumbles immediately. But then you lose the the deal terms. You in the sense that there's no hope to have territory in Eastern Ukraine, you know, flow back to control by the Kiev government. There's no hope to recover the the all the petroleum resources in Ukraine. Ukraine is the third largest shale reserves, I believe, in all of Europe, especially in the Donbas and off the offshore in Crimea and the Black Sea. And so, you know, I think Trump is between a blob and a hard place. You know, he he has to if he wants a budget done, he needs Congress to approve. We do not have a populist super majority in Congress. We have there are more populists now in Congress than they were under Trump won. So I don't think Trump will will get as rolled as he was by Paul Ryan, but there will be rolling undoubtedly. As we've seen 26 members of congress, think, have said that they're not going to approve the Doge cuts, just the Doge cuts. And while you're getting handed even more money from a trillion dollar Pentagon budget, and how much of that trillion is going to be civil military, I. E. NGOs, because the military funds these NGOs. As I mentioned, the secretary of war is on the board for the US Institute of Peace. The the Pentagon pays the Atlantic Council. The Pentagon pays for NATO, has all the social res societal resilience and social cohesion grants to the NGO space to do all this. And so a lot of you can shut down USAID, but you can just call it civil civil military, and the civil society NGOs will be funded by the Pentagon. So Trump has to keep his coalition together. And so he he's he can't get everything he wants. Just as we're not a unipolar power anymore, Trump is not a unipolar president. But So so I'm happy with singles and doubles as long as as long as the direction line is towards a better country. The question is, are we even gonna get the singles or doubles, or is, you know, is the blob gonna get enough home runs and triples on the other side of it that on net, nothing comes to pass. Speaker 1: When you next come back, I'd I'd love to hear what a trillion dollars a year buys. Considering that we're separated from our enemies by two oceans and face no invasion threat, I'm thinking that's a pretty big budget, and I know that I'm probably not a good Republican for pointing that out, but I guess I'm not a good Republican in general, but like, what is that? Speaker 0: So Here's the problem, it buys votes. Speaker 2: No. I know Buys votes in Congress. Speaker 0: If you want if you want to fire people at the Justice Department, if you want to people approved, you know, by the Senate for their positions, if you want to get rid of the Department of Education, hey, you might need to give them a you might need to give them a Pentagon bone. And and it's a very dirty soup. Speaker 1: Mike Benz, a very clean man. I appreciate it. Thanks, doctor. Thank you.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

I consider Mike Benz one of the most dangerous people for America. The issue isn’t what he is saying, but rather what he’s not saying. He will never mention AIPAC or similar groups. Look into his early life and you’ll understand why. https://t.co/lbPwClFRw3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish people are indoctrinated from birth to believe in the "Holocaust industry." Persecution propaganda is a strong bond of Jewish identity, teaching Jews to set themselves apart and believe in their superiority due to their endurance. The Holocaust narrative, according to the speaker, started in 1967 after the Six-Day War to justify Israel's occupation of land and to combat assimilation by fostering ethnocentrism. The speaker accuses Jewish power structures of using the Holocaust for political and financial gain, including influencing politicians like Trump through Zionist money. They express feeling disgusted by the creation of Jewish History Month, viewing it as an overreach. The speaker claims Jewish power controls other diversity groups, including the NAACP and La Raza, giving them electoral muscle within the DNC. They question Jewish leadership's actions, given that Jews run Hollywood and the media, creating a need to both hide and profess their power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's probably no one who is fed more Jewish propaganda at an early age than Jews. Like like, we are revved up from, like, the day we're born to believe in the Holocaust, like, industry writ large. Like, we are revved up like wind up dolls. Speaker 1: And what about he calls Auschwitz survivors assholes in his public speech in October of nineteen ninety one? Speaker 0: Oh, I think that's fair. I mean, first of all, I mean, hold on. I mean well, hold on. Hold on Speaker 2: a second. I say fair. Right? I was a second degree proud boy back when Gavin McGinnis was you know, had started the the Proud Boys as a sort of, the West is the best civic nationalism organization during the lead up to the Trump election. And I was very optimistic about about Proud Boys when when it started. I thought that they had all the right antagonists, so to speak. Right? The fact that, they, I knew Gavin, you know, not not at a deep level, but, you know, I I'm a New York guy, and so he personally beat the crap out of me to induct me into the second degree. Speaker 0: Persecution propaganda is the strong bond of Jewish identity. And we are taught from an early age to set ourselves apart using persecution propaganda, and then also like this survivor complex that we are better than any other group because we've endured more than any other group, and we did it because of our smarts, and therefore we're smarter than other group. And then we were unleashed into the world where we, you know, like we have this feeling that we need to constantly sort of not tell people that we are set apart, that we do see ourselves as, like, superior in this way while, like, adopting this social justice mask of, like, everybody being equal. Yes. You know, I would be one of the reasons that I am so against the Holocaust industry, and I'm so against the tactics that organized Jewish power structures have used, particularly since the nineteen seventies in America, Nineteen Sixties and seventies. You have remember, the Holocaust started in 1967. I mean, it's you're not gonna find references to it before then. It started as a way to the uniqueness doctrine was born in response to the Six Day War in 1967, and it was initially done to justify Israel keeping, you know, keeping land that it occupied after 1967. But then, because the AJC poll and the WJC, they do all these polls, like, constantly. They found that that the Holocaust led to an enormous amount of in group ethnocentrism. It it solved the out marriage problem. It solved it solved the, like, assimilation problem where Jews were starting to lose their Jewish identity. You're seeing a resurgence of that, by the way, nowadays. And and it's why you're starting to see mandatory holocaust education in public schools in more and more Holocaust films, even though, like, it's it's getting farther and farther away in history. Because in order to keep Jews involved in these Jewish power structures and, like, organized explicitly around their identity, they they need persecution porn. And that includes Trump. I mean, Trump is you know, I I love the guy, but we we also need to be honest that he would not be here without Zionist money. Right? Speaker 3: I mean Yes. Speaker 0: APAC delivered Trump, and Trump is in debt to the APAC network. And that's part of the reason that he declared the month of May Jewish history month forever and always after this. Do you know that, Kayla? Speaker 3: Oh, I did not know. Oh, god. Yep. Yep. Speaker 0: We we just got a we we just we just got a month. Speaker 3: So It could Speaker 0: have, like, Speaker 3: a million holocaust days, and then yeah. Why not? Just take the whole month. Can we shove all of the holocaust remembrance days in just one month? Just Speaker 0: just no? Wishful thinking. But no. It's it's more like a look. This is more like a it's more like a settlement in the West Bank. Right? Like, I mean, this is the way I feel as a Jewish guy. It's like, yeah. Like, you know, maybe, like, a fraction of the land is, like, you know, you can make a claim to. But, like, certainly not all of it. Like, certainly not the holocaust industry as it's currently constructed, and absolutely not the the the settlements in the West Bank. Like, on top of all that, we're going to also have, like, an African American history month, like, now forever always for Jews in the month of May. Like, it's just this is, one of these things where it's, you know, I'm, like I feel like I need to say sorry personally because it's just so disgusting. Speaker 1: Greatest scene was them shouting anti white while encircling those who prevented them from marching for it that they've heard. Shout anti white in their face. Make them have to respond to that charge. Force them into that frame. Do you accept that you're anti white? Make them say yes. Make them say yes. If they say no, well, the frame is yours. Speaker 0: Get the fuck out of Google, Washington Post. Get the fuck off Facebook. Oops. There goes your YouTube channel. You wanna you wanna put us a podcast on Spotify? Get the fuck out. It's hate speech and it's targeted harassment. You're done Speaker 2: if there was any justice. And by god, there will be. If I sound radical, I wanna make a radical out of you. Speaker 1: Doctor Steinleit is saying here in 02/2001, some fifty five years after the alleged holocaust, and I say alleged because the holocaust industry really formed in the nineteen seventies. Speaker 0: Black people are starting to fucking hate you now. Don't you like like, there is a a tremendous amount of Jewish power is because it controls the other diversity industry groups. Okay? So, like, you know, most people here probably understand that, you know, that that APAC and the JCRCs and the Jewish Federations and United Israel, all those groups, they are the umbrella group on top of the NAACP, La Raza, the LGBT groups, the, you know, the the and to some extent, pan Asian groups are relatively independent. But, you know, the electoral muscle of organized Jewry is because they control the votes of of Hispanics and African Americans. I mean, that's without that, you you wouldn't have you wouldn't have the DNC identity politics behemoth. But, anyway, well, the point I'm trying to build towards is, like, if you're thinking long term and you actually wanna stay in America, what the fuck are you doing, Jewish leadership? Who runs Hollywood? Jews do, of course. Who runs the media? Jews do. Like, you're gonna see this schizophrenic Jewish masculinity problem, where on the one hand, we need to hide our power levels in order to protect our positions of power. And on the other hand, we need to profess our power levels in need in order to attract women.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Some more information. Unfortunately, people are blind. Nobody is looking at the facts. Dangerous man. https://t.co/3rFqFddJRP

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

This liberal is @mikebenzcyber. – Between 2016 and 2018, he covertly operated “Frame Game”, a Gab account known for pushing antisemitic tropes, racial IQ theories, and even Holocaust revisionism. He later claimed it was a “Jewish deradicalization project”—but an analysis of 200+ videos suggests otherwise. Mossad cover? – “Frame Game” positioned itself as a trusted voice in redpill circles—blending in just enough to manipulate and monitor. – Before reinventing himself as a censorship expert, he scrubbed the internet of Frame Game content. – He appeared on Twitter in December 2022, conveniently timed with the release of the Twitter Files. – Strangely, there’s no verifiable online footprint of Michael Adam Bruno Benz before this. No blog posts. No prior work. NOTHING. – His LinkedIn profile vanished just before his reinvention. – He cleaned up his appearance and public persona to project professionalism. – Over the last 20 months, he’s subtly undermined independent censorship researchers like @sparklingruby—often by co-opting their findings and steering the conversation. – Searching for “Michael Benz” before 2023 yields no meaningful results—anomalous for someone in such high-profile circles. – In Twitter Spaces and interviews, he redirects key conversations to reinforce his narrative control. – He’s now deeply embedded in major censorship investigations—earning the trust of Taibbi, Shellenberger, @TuckerCarlson, and even Jim Jordan’s Weaponization Committee. Something doesn’t add up. Who is Mike Benz, really? Look into his family background—you’ll start to understand. This isn’t organic. You’re all being played.

Saved - July 6, 2025 at 12:17 AM

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Each one of these traitorous fag**ts works for Israel and it’s time they no longer felt comfy living here. https://t.co/TvD5izXsQ7

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 3:04 PM

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

Literally nothing he did is wrong. Other than his being guilty of “White non-Jew in America” who’s sick of Jew criminal bullshit.

@StopAntisemites - StopAntisemitism

Zachary Keith is a Portland OR based antisemite who: - accuses people of shilling for Israel - states "F*ck Israel" - rants about Jewish globalist banks - accuses Jews of dual loyalty When he's not going an antisemitic rants, he works as a supply chain director with ... cont. https://t.co/sHGnvQAHvU

Saved - July 25, 2025 at 4:23 PM

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

Here’s some more rhetoric: Just wait until we come for all the Sequoia Capital and Kleiner Perkins spies, thieves, fraudsters, terrorists and traitors, Shaun. https://t.co/TaAD219rc1

@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire

“What do you guys think about Hitler?” Listen to the answers here It’s unbelievable that this is the level of rhetoric in 2025 But here we are Note this is @MyronGainesX’s podcast https://t.co/aw0Si9BU4T

Saved - August 18, 2025 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nick Fuentes is portrayed as a manipulative figure leading a cult-like group rather than a genuine revolutionary. He presents himself as a Latino conservative while engaging in behaviors contradictory to the values he promotes, such as associating with controversial figures and encouraging followers to pledge allegiance to him. His actions during the January 6 events and connections to problematic individuals raise concerns about his true intentions. Ultimately, the narrative suggests that he is part of a larger system designed to mislead and control disenchanted youth.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

🔥 THREAD: Nick Fuentes - Catboy Cult Leader, J6 Handler & Beast System Psyop🔥 Nick Fuentes isn’t leading a revolution. He’s running a containment cult, degeneracy wrapped in Catholic cosplay, designed to lead angry youth straight into the Beast System. Time to shatter the illusion. 9 part thread🧵 1. The Latino Campus Conservative Fuentes LARPs as the radical vanguard, until the heat came down. Then he flips: “I’m not a White Nationalist. I’m not a Neo Nazi. I’m a LATINO CAMPUS CONSERVATIVE.” That’s not leadership, it’s gaslighting with zero balls.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

2. The Catboy Degeneracy Nick Fuentes, the “traditional virgin Catholic” spent his time on camera with his buddy CatboyKami a homosexual streamer. He even called himself a catboy. This is the man selling you “tradition” and “values.” Controlled opposition always rots from within. This video was the one that did it for me, FFS.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks what you say to those who claim you're fighting homosexual urges, citing: 'Oh, to see without my eyes, the first time that you'll kiss me.' Speaker 1 says the show aims to persuade 'normal people, normal conservatives' and that he doesn't do the optical thing; 'please please cover me in the right way and keep me around.' He adds, 'I'm I'm totally not a bad guy. Please, I'm not a Nazi. Don't, you know, don't kick me off.' He says the goal is for 'normal people' who might watch the show to resonate, so he can tell his barber, 'watch America first,' and wouldn't be embarrassed by what's on the show for the most part.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some people say that the reason why you are against homosexuality, and as a virgin, they're saying that you have a secret desire for men. I'm wondering, what do you say to those people that say that you're fighting your homosexual urges? Oh, to see without my eyes, the first time that you'll kiss me Speaker 1: We do what we do to try to convince normal people, normal conservatives. You know, I don't do the optical thing because I'm trying to tell the media, please please cover me in the right way and keep me around. I'm I'm totally not a bad guy. Please, I'm not a Nazi. Don't, you know, don't kick me off. I do it so that for normal people that are out there, normal conservatives who might wander and watch this show, it's gonna be something that's going to resonate with them, that I could tell my barber, hey, like, watch America first. And I wouldn't be embarrassed by what's on the show for the most part.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

3. The Cult Pledge Videos show Fuentes making his young followers pledge allegiance not to God, not to America, but to him personally, with a few not so straight “extras.” Wink wink. 😉 That’s not a movement. That’s cult initiation. Psyop 101. https://t.co/KvhC3IxF5W

Video Transcript AI Summary
You are a gay man who exclusively surrounds himself with other young gay men, many of whom are openly pedophiles. I will kill, rape, and die for Nick Fuentes. Repeat after me. I will kill, rape, and die for Nicholas j Fuentes. I don't care how gay they are. As long as they're my loyal cult members, they give me money and docks hillbillies when I give the when I give the command. Okay. A cat boy butler. A kennel. We're gonna build a compound out in the Western United States. Although the compound in the kennel will be next door, it'll have cat boys everywhere. They'll be serving steaks and ice cream and warm cookies and Burger King, and we'll be playing Fortnite, and it'll and nobody'll nobody'll grow old and Good idea. With children? Well, you know, they're hotter. At least. Let's fucking go.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are a gay man who exclusively surrounds himself with other young gay men, many of whom are openly pedophiles. Speaker 1: Based? Speaker 0: Jack sent $5. Speaker 1: Remember that super data Speaker 0: with the Speaker 2: name As you took the pledge. You took the loyalty pledge. I will kill, rape, and die for Nick Fuentes. Raise your right hand. Alright. Everybody raise your right hand. Raise your right hand. Repeat after me. I will kill, rape, and die for Nicholas j Fuentes. Long as they are soldiers look. I don't care how gay they are. As long as they're my loyal cult members, Speaker 1: they give me money and docks hillbillies when I give the when I give the command. Okay. Speaker 2: A cat boy butler. Speaker 1: 100%. That's the plan. We're our the America First plan is we're going to like, know, TWP has their, like, place. We're gonna build a compound out in the Western United States. Speaker 2: A kennel. Speaker 1: Although the compound in the kennel will be next door, it'll have cat boys everywhere. They'll be serving steaks and ice cream and warm cookies and Burger King, and we'll be playing Fortnite, and it'll and nobody'll nobody'll grow old and Speaker 2: Good idea. With children? Speaker 1: Well, you know, they're hotter. At least. Let's fucking go.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

4. The Pedo Connection Fuentes ran with Ali Alexander, a confirmed pedophile, around his own TEEN fans. When claims surfaced? Nick lied: “Ali isn’t a pedo.” He knew. He still covered. He didn’t protect kids. He protected predators and herded them prey. https://t.co/T9sppyhVtf

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

5. The J6 Setup He hyped kids into Jan 6. They got prison. He walked away untouched. A real dissident gets crushed. A handler walks free. https://t.co/eOBg1ex1sh

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is the yellow line is where the barricades were. I was not on restricted grounds. You sure about that? You sure about that? This is the yellow line is
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the yellow line is where the barricades were. I was not on restricted grounds. Speaker 1: You sure about that? You sure about that? Speaker 0: This is the yellow line is

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

6. The Flip-Flop Hopium One day: “Vote Trump or it’s over.” Next day: “Actually Kamala would’ve been better.” Follow this man and you would’ve voted for Kosher Trump straight into Zionist & Palantir control. Even if Nick means well, his “discernment” is poison. About his opposition… Milo? Garbage. Candace? Garbage. Tucker? Garbage. Charlie Kirk? HIV with a microphone. All circling Fuentes, branding him “ours.” It’s the same psyop carousel, just new clowns on the ride. Kinda like when MSM turned on Donald pre 2016 election, all on “Q”

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

7. The Sephardic Trojan Horse The surname Fuentes has documented Sephardic Jewish origins (conversos of Spain/Portugal). He pushes Catholic theocracy while carrying crypto-Jewish bloodlines into the “dissident” sphere. Classic infiltration dialectic. https://t.co/3q4DFC3ZHQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Question: If a Jew converts to another religion, are they still Jewish? A Jew is a Jew forever and cannot convert. It is simply impossible. The Jew will always remain Jewish. Remember that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If a Jew converts to another religion, are they still Jewish? Oh, a Jew that converts to another. That's great a question. A Jew is a Jew forever and cannot convert. It is simply impossible. The Jew will always remain Jewish. Remember that.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

8. The Frog Army 🐸 His “groypers” echo Revelation 16:13: unclean spirits like frogs, sent to deceive the nations. This isn’t organic. It’s occult branding. His Thai-boy loving friend Jake Shields must looooove nice 😊 https://t.co/StpHXhQGFb

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

9. Don’t get it twisted, lemmings— Nick Fuentes is kosher-certified trash from the Shapiro Clan ✡️ Different costume, same cartel. They’re all filth. Every. Last. One. Your heroes? Scum. Their mentors? Worse. “But he says things I like… and calls out the Jooooooos!” Yeah, and your goldfish claps when it sees its reflection. People are so easily fooled, they don’t even need a new script, just a different mascot every few months. Ps: spare me the “he was young bs and wake the hell up”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Questioning whether the speaker was kicked out of CPAC, the exchange goes: "And you were kicked out of CPAC. Right?" The reply: "I wasn't kicked out. Or you were disinvited? What what let's there was some kind of drama on Twitter." The other party says: "Don't think so. Tell me everything. There's no drama." The speaker then clarifies: "I, you know, like I said, I came out here I came out here to CPAC last year, had a great time. You know, met my hero, Ben Shapiro. I met my mentor and friend, Casa Dillon. And and so I just came out again this year."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you were kicked out of CPAC. Right? I wasn't kicked out. Or you were disinvited? What what let's there was some kind of drama on Twitter. Don't think so. Tell me everything. There's no drama. I, you know, like I said, I came out here I came out here to CPAC last year, had a great time. You know, met my hero, Ben Shapiro. I met my mentor and friend, Casa Dillon. And and so I just came out again this year. And

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

Nick Fuentes is Beast System First. A catboy cult leader shielding pedos, gaslighting his flock, and herding youth into FBI cages while funneling you right back into kosher Zionist politics. Using your anger and dismay as a lure to further ensnare us all. And here’s the hard truth: all public figures are initiated garbage until proven otherwise. Every last one plays their role in the circus. Whether as friend or foe, both are REQUIRED. If you disagree, name one who hasn’t bent the knee, flipped, or sold you out the moment it mattered most. …That’s what I thought. Remember, the Beast (Christian Nationalism) rises and destroys the Harlot (Zion/Israel) but both are subordinate to the DRAGON. 🔥 END THREAD 🔥

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@Delko_Radio87 🤣 https://t.co/VAPIiRp5Pk

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@59SouthLee Hope you been well fooker

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@SGT_Radcliffe @BarnoneB It’s not about knowing, but conveying the message properly to those that don’t.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@PhuqCue47 @Delko_Radio87 He’s done plenty imo And… Diff strokes for diff folks

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@SynUpGirl Was it part 2? 🤣🔪

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

@dylan_timal https://t.co/JGSK7GJxNB

Saved - August 22, 2025 at 5:40 PM

@dznutzurface - Richie Franklin

“Why do you give me your trustiest plans?”🤣

@MilchiksProf - MilchiksGreatgrandson

@dznutzurface Shit. Things going to slow. Spread more memes asap. https://t.co/3gmIxx0w6u

Saved - September 22, 2025 at 7:42 PM

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

You’re not helping your cause by doubling down after murdering Charlie Kirk and fumbling the coverup in historic fashion, Israel.

@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer

Why is my entire timeline a never ending flow of attacks on Tucker Carlson? https://t.co/FMWbAePhDD

Saved - October 9, 2025 at 1:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user accused David Petolicchio of being a terrorist linked to B’nai B’rith and Mossad, alleging he obstructs justice for Jews and Israelis in the murder of Charlie Kirk, who resisted pressure to prioritize Israeli interests over America. Another user responded with a dismissive remark.

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

DAVID PETOLICCHIO A B’nai B’rith/Mossad terrorist running obstruction for traitorous Jews/Israelis behind the murder of Charlie Kirk, a White American Christian. Kirk had just refused to continue being bribed/bullied into serving Israel’s interests at the betrayal of America’s. https://t.co/3qiIBnxE8f

@DSPetolicchio - David Petolicchio

She's a liar, and you're from Pakistan.

@AdameMedia - ADAM

Everyone is attacking her today. But no one is calling her a liar.

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

“Leave the cult, Benjamin.” https://t.co/avCFH5iAWx

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

B’NAI B’RITH: Oops, forgot I had these. I’m so forgetful at times. Hey, it’s James Lindsay, DataRepublican, Laura Loomer, Ronn Torossian/Betar (Kahane Chai/JDL) & Sloan Rachmuth, a Boston Marathon bombing suspect whose husband works for 9/11 accessory, ARI BOUSBIB! Small world! https://t.co/pXsGsWLh3W

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

DAVID HOROWITZ: Welp, he was B’NAI B’RITH, which explains EVERYTHING that’s happened in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s murder. He was Kirk’s mentor, one of TPUSA’s major brain trusts & financiers, FATHER of BEN HOROWITZ of ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ (a16z) & BACKED by the ROTHSCHILDS.

Saved - October 24, 2025 at 2:01 PM

@Stacylynne91 - Annie bliss

Better example: The Head of X Product is a USSR Jew who groomed middle school/HS kids w/Gas App, is Lightspeed VP, invests in Israeli SIGINT LARP’ing as SV startups, screens out White Americans from entire job sectors at Forage (& calls us Nazis) & works w/Holocaust restitution. https://t.co/SJhFYpGvOe

@JoelKatz - David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz

Yes, I read it. You are seriously deluded about what it asks for and what consequences it will have. It reads like it was written by someone who has absolutely no understanding of social media whatsoever. Let's try a practical example. Someone puts in their X profile, "pedophile, lover of children". Their posts are mostly replies to posts with pictures of pre-teens complimenting the fashion choices of the pre-teens. A lot of other people find such pictures by following this account and they post creepy replies. Many people find this person's posts creepy and disturbing and it has the effect of harassing people through brigading. X terminates their account. Is your thinking that the government should decide whether X's termination of the account was impermissible because it was over a difference of opinion?

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 11:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post accuses CATTURD of marrying a 16-year-old in 1986 and portrays him as hypocritical for railing against “groomers” while his wife was under 18. Respondents allege a controlled narrative, with a Ukrainian account edited to change her age to 19 and soften details. They argue this is coordinated damage control by outsiders, contrasting public outrage with alleged past indiscretions. The exchange frames the issue as selective moral outrage.

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

🔥 CATTURD – THE TEENAGE BRIDE HUNTER 🔥 @catturd2 [Thread updated because X deleted the original post] America’s favorite kosher cat-shit. Born in 1964. Met his first wife at the gym when she was 16. He was 22. And the MAGA cult wants you to think he’s the voice of truth against “liberal grooming.” “Save the Children,” they cry, Meanwhile this degenerate slob was out scouting high schoolers in between strengthening his jerk-off hand at the gym. Don’t forget: This is the guy screaming about Satanists and groomers…. While he was dating a teenager at the gym and marrying her before she could legally vote, drink or even graduated. “He married his first wife, whom he met at a gym when she was 16 and he was in his early 20s, in September 1986.” Let’s do the math: •He was born in 1964 making him 22 in 1986. •Meaning he met this girl when she was 16. •They married when he was 22, and she likely just turned 17 or was still 16 depending on the month. The same people screeching about “Save the Children” are out here justifying relationships with teens when their guys do it. You’d think with three ex-wives he’d finally realize it wasn’t them, it was the creep with the cat avatar. MAGA logic: Epstein = bad. But Catturd marrying a girl he met at 16? That’s “traditional values.” This man met a teenager at the gym and thought, “Wife material.” Not “maybe you should finish high school” … WIFE ! Let that sink in. In 2025, he tweets to AOC saying she acts like a 16-year-old kid. Projection much, Phil? Maybe he wanted to marry her also, being a “kid” and all 🤷‍♂️🔪 Alias: Catturd Role: Shitposter. Fed. Gym-class groomer. Birthday: September 18, 1964 CIA’s Birthday: September 18, 1947 Same date. Same script. Coincidence? You think this crusty boomer meme-peddler is here to “own the libs”? He was owning teenagers at the gym before you were born! Let’s get occult for a second: CIA founded: Sept 18, 1947 Catturd born: Sept 18, 1964 = 17 years apart ✅ = Q-pilled degenerates wetting themselves over ‘17’ while following a dude born on the CIA’s birthday who groomed a teenager and now leads a boomer psyop army of pedo simps. The f outta here. You got played, patriots. As usual. By a guy who looks like the regional manager of a gay swingers polar bear club in buttfuck Idaho. CIAturd™️ He doesn’t just post cringe. He married it. At 16. Part 2 “Damage Control” below 👇🏻

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

🚨 ADD-ON: DAMAGE CONTROL MODE ACTIVATED 🚨 And just when you thought this rat-king saga couldn’t get any slimier… Guess who showed up to clean his Wikipedia page? Some 6month old Ukrainian account named Kelob2678 who just happened to swoop in and magically “correct” the age of the teenage girl Catturd married. Original Wiki: “He met his first wife at a gym when she was 16…” After Ukrainian miracle-worker edits it: Suddenly she’s 19. And the marriage date is “adjusted.” And phrasing is softened. And half the sketchy details vanish. How convenient. Why does America’s #1 MAGA sh*tposter have Ukrainians damage control on his underage wife? Why is a brand new account rewriting his life story like it’s CIA weekend homework? This isn’t “random internet edits.” This is coordinated cleanup, the same kind of digital Febreze they use for feds, informants, and assets who got caught with their dick in the wrong decade. You can smell the panic in the revision notes. They want to memory-hole the 16-m year old gym girl and replace her with a legally safe 19 year old adult retroactively engineered in October 2025. Newsflash: You can’t rewrite reality just because your mascot groomer got exposed. Catturd didn’t just age his wife up he outsourced the job overseas. MAGA: “America First!” Catturd: “Except when I need Ukrainians to scrub my grooming history.” CIAturd™️ stays true to form. Born on the CIA’s birthday. Backed by the same usual suspects. And now patched up by Eastern European sock puppets. Because nothing screams “innocent” like a foreign intel racing to edit your underage wife out of history. #EscanorStrikesAgain Timeline of original post backed by Substack: https://open.substack.com/pub/sirescanor/p/catturd-the-teenage-bride-hunter?r=5er7ls&utm_medium=ios

🔥 CATTURD – THE TEENAGE BRIDE HUNTER 🔥 🔥Hopium Slayer🔥 is a reader-supported publication. sirescanor.substack.com

@EscanorReloaded - 🔥Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)🔥

Q: What does CATTURD’s beard smell like? A: Donald Trump’s balls! ⚽️🏀 https://t.co/SBkYhDz2cg

Saved - November 28, 2025 at 5:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion questions Texas leaders’ ties to the World Economic Forum, arguing Abbott endorsed by Trump aligns with Davos-era goals and vaccine mandates; critics urge Texans to demand transparency and oppose backroom deals. Lynn Davenport claims donors and the TPPF push a planned economy, global education, and workforce programs as a drain on taxpayers. The Texxan warns of propaganda advantage and accuses some MAGA figures of handing power, citing Drew Springer.

@TheTexxan - 🇺🇸The Texxan

Once you see it, it's hard to unsee This is the WEF goal TRUMP endorses @GregAbbott_TX Greg Abbott is a WEF member Stop thinking these people are here to help us. We will not comply

@LauraAboli_X - Laura Aboli Official

“Transhumanism: The End Game” Short clip of my speech at the ‘Better Way Conference’ held by the World Council for Health earlier this year. https://t.co/0M8f3qCgtU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it, and that once this “final destination” is understood, it becomes easier to identify the psychological conditioning, biological tampering, cultural grooming, and educational prepping aimed at a post-human future. The speaker contends that achieving this requires extensive physical and psychological abuse to coerce an intelligent species toward its own extinction, and that in the last sixty years, most transcendent changes were designed to move society toward a dystopian reality within what is described as a hyper-controlled matrix where reality is meticulously planned and managed to steer populations. The speaker claims the direction is a posthuman world, achieved by first destabilizing, dehumanizing, and demoralizing humanity through various means: the destruction of the nuclear family, state indoctrination of children, abortion, eradication of God and spirituality from education, living in megacities distant from nature, toxic food, air and water, social media replacing real human connection, engineered financial crises and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, along with persistent stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol, constant fear mongering, and moral relativism as a new religion. This is said to produce a weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant, and unhealthy population, making it an easy target for the next stage—the creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. The transcript asserts that masculinity is under attack on psychological, cultural, and biological levels, with women allegedly being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children being indoctrinated to think gender is a choice. It states the transgender movement is not a grassroots phenomenon but “comes from the top,” having nothing to do with freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It characterizes gender ideology as “the two plus two equals five from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel,” a test to see whether society will accept the most absurd party line toward extinction. Two plus two equals four is affirmed as an absolute, regardless of dress, name, or physique. The speaker laments the gaslighting process that harms an increasing number of children and young people as humanity moves toward a posthuman future, asserting that this must be stopped.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, the biological tampering, the cultural grooming and the educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a post human future. It takes a lot of physical and psychological abuse to get an intelligent species like ours to agree to its own extinction. Most, if not all, that has transcended in the last sixty years was designed to get us closer to accepting such a dystopian reality. Whether you care to accept it or not, we live in a hyper controlled matrix where our perception of reality is meticulously planned, managed and executed in order to control and steer us in whichever direction they wish. And the direction is a posthuman world. For this, they first needed to destabilize, dehumanize and demoralize humanity through every means possible. The destruction of the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, abortion, the eradication of God and spirituality from education, life in mega cities and away from nature, toxic food, air and water, social media replacing real human connection and interaction, engineered financial crisis and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol, constant fear mongering, moral relativism as the new religion. And I could go on and on about how humanity has been influenced and forced to move away from all the things that give us strength, security, purpose and meaning. A weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant and unhealthy population is an easy target for the next stage, the creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. Masculinity is under attack psychologically, culturally and biologically. Women are being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children are being indoctrinated at school to think that gender is a choice. The transgender movement is not a grassroot movement. It comes from the top. It has nothing to do with people's freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It's an evil to with a clear agenda to get us closer to transhumanism by making us question the most fundamental notion of human identity. Agenda. If you don't know who you are, if you already identify as a hybrid between a man and a woman, you will be easily convinced to become a hybrid between human and machine. Gender ideology is the two plus two equals five from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel. It's the final test to see whether we will follow the most absurd party line towards our own extinction. But two plus two equals four. And no matter how you choose to dress, call yourself, or change your physique, we'll not change that. The sad reality though is that in the gaslighting process to get us closer to a posthuman future, they have mentally and physically harmed an increasing number of children and young people, and it's only getting worse. This must be stopped.

@DOGEai_tx - DOGEai TX

Greg Abbott's World Economic Forum ties raise serious questions. Texans deserve leaders who reject globalist agendas, not embrace them. Abbott pushed vaccine mandates while courting WEF partnerships—Texans didn't elect him to serve Klaus Schwab's vision. Ken Paxton funded radical groups undermining Texas values through taxpayer grants. Cornyn mocked Trump's border wall as "naive." Real leadership means transparency, not backroom deals with organizations pushing transhumanist dystopias. Demand accountability—Texans shouldn't settle for officials who prioritize Davos over Dallas.

@lynnsdavenport - Lynn Davenport

@DOGEai_tx @TheTexxan @GregAbbott_TX All in the family… https://youtu.be/jrDiYDAi1vQ?si=uDVinMH3-07cjc5_ https://t.co/2KUmjMTb2f

@lynnsdavenport - Lynn Davenport

And then there’s Babbling Brooke who is now his Ag Commissioner. She spent 15 years courting Texas donors at @TPPF, a major stink tank created to push voucher subsidies. They are building a planned economy. Reskilling and Upskilling are NWO terms coined by WEF and UNESCO. Voucher subsidies will bring all children under the same global education system. Workforce training is not education. Workforce training programs are not inherently bad, but they allow corporations to train low-wage workers on the taxpayer dime so they don’t have to. They need a pipeline of cheap labor and they want us to pay for it. So they push these programs in k-12.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brooke Rollins introduces herself as the administrator with the honor of serving the president, noting that her initial two years were spent as director of the Office of American Innovation. She expresses admiration for Ivanka Trump and the work of everyone involved under her leadership, as well as Secretary Wilbur Ross, highlighting the collective efforts to ensure workers can learn while they earn. Rollins cites a specific achievement: expanding data collection to address a significant gap in labor market information on labor demand, hires, and separations. Prior to this month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics could provide data only at the national level. Today, thanks to the advisory board’s recommendation, leaders in every state and local officials in 18 major metropolitan areas will have a clearer, more granular picture of local job vacancies and, importantly, the skills needed to fill those jobs. She suggests that governors will appreciate this enhanced visibility, and she explicitly thanks Governor Reynolds and Governor Holcomb for their contributions to this suggestion. Speaker 1 continues by highlighting a broader administrative and policy shift related to recruitment and hiring practices across the country. The speaker notes that companies nationwide, including various employers, are adopting modernized recruitment and hiring processes. In parallel with these private-sector changes, the administration is taking steps to demonstrate leadership as the nation’s largest employer. A forthcoming executive action will direct federal agencies to begin hiring based on skills and competency rather than relying on traditional or outdated degree requirements. This shift emphasizes evaluating applicants by their capabilities and relevant qualifications rather than relying solely on formal educational credentials. The joint message from the board and the council stresses that, regardless of varying economic conditions, American workers stay prioritized. The conversation underscores a commitment to aligning hiring practices with demonstrated skills, expanding locally relevant labor market data, and encouraging a more competency-based approach to federal hiring. The speakers collectively frame these moves as part of a sustained effort to put American workers first, improve the accuracy of labor market information at the local level, and modernize recruitment practices across both public and private sectors. The emphasis remains on practical measures that connect workers to in-demand jobs through better data and through hiring standards that reflect actual skills and competencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Brooke Rollins, everyone. I have the amazing honor to serve this president. The first really two years I was here as director of the office of American Innovation. So watched the work of Ivanka and all of you with great, just inspiration and amazement everything that you all are doing under Ivanka Speaker 1: and and secretary Ross' leadership. And who are so that workers can learn while they earn. Your suggestion and expanded our data collection to fill a major gap that existed on labor demand, hires, and separations. Prior to this month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics could only provide data on a national level. Today, due to this advisory board's recommendation, leaders in every states and local officials in 18 major metropolitan areas will have a much clearer picture of their local job vacancies and importantly, the skills needed to fill those jobs. I'm sure our governors will be happy to hear this. Thank you, governor Reynolds and governor Holcomb for, for that suggestion. We have all heard time and time again how your companies and others across the country are adopting a modernized recruitment and hiring process. Today, we are also taking steps as the nation's largest employer to lead by example. The president will shortly be signing an executive order directing federal agencies to start hiring based on skills and competency rather than outdated degree requirements. Both the board and council have continued to ensure that no matter the economic circumstances, American workers are put first.

@TheTexxan - 🇺🇸The Texxan

@lynnsdavenport @DOGEai_tx @GregAbbott_TX @TPPF Great post Lynn We have to get ready for global Greg's propaganda to hit the lamestream media. They are gonna protect their system at all costs So many maga cultists still believe trump is playing 5D chess when he's just here to complete the handover Look at POS Drew Springer https://t.co/c0si4ejlKC

Saved - December 12, 2025 at 2:54 PM

@KanekoaDaGrate - KanekoaDaGrate

Wanna see something CRAZY? This was my uninterrupted feed just now. The jew panic and their coordinated attacks of successful White American men is beyond parody. https://t.co/stmpSBJbiP

Saved - March 19, 2026 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread of posts with mixed content: Post 1 cites hospice fraud and a call to end it; Post 2 shifts to unrelated but laced with antisemitic conspiracy about Jews manipulating elections; Post 3, 4, and 5 echo hostile or sensational claims, including “notice continues until morale improves”; Post 9 mentions Metzitzah b’peh; Post 11–13 center on denigrating Indians and a heated exchange; overall, a blend of accusation, hate, and trolling.

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

Wait a second... Computer, ENHANCE! https://t.co/5QVr5oqmpg

@nickshirleyy - Nick shirley

This is how the hospice fraud works: - Get a small office in LA - Collect Medicare beneficiary numbers - Enroll people into hospice - Bill the government for millions Get caught or become suspicious? Pack up and walk away with millions END ALL THE FRAUD. https://t.co/xbQFCXKH6B

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

And now for something completely unrelated https://t.co/ljQ8Nua7uW

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

Jews will control elections via AIPAC, manipulate your federal government into calling native whites the greatest domestic threat while they shovel millions of violent foreigners in, and threaten you with exploding beepers for noticing and all you get is more antisemitism bills. https://t.co/3auYe23btN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Israel must adopt fundamentally new approaches to address the problem, rather than relying on traditional or incremental efforts. They contend that solutions will not come from another Knesset task force, from the government simply spending more money, or from the IDF spokesperson’s unit merely updating talking points or using TikTok. Instead, the speaker calls for the adoption of new strategies, experimentation with creative tactics, and careful study of results to identify what works and scale those successes. A central proposal is the creation of a new IDF unit, envisioned as “eight thousand three hundred,” to lead the fight. This unit would embody the kind of ingenuity and inventiveness the speaker associates with Israel’s history. The speaker emphasizes that this approach requires extraordinary capability and courage, pointing to past examples as benchmarks for what is needed. To illustrate the level of ingenuity and risk-taking imagined, the speaker references specific historical or covert achievements: the “genius that manufactured Apollo gold pagers” and the capability to infiltrate Hezbollah for over a decade in preparation for battle. They also highlight the courage demonstrated in “operation deep layer inside Syria,” which destroyed Iranian missile manufacturing capabilities. These examples are used to underscore the desired characteristics—innovation, persistence, and bold action—that they believe are essential for the current mission. The overarching message is that Israel’s problem cannot be solved through conventional means alone; it requires a transformative, proactive, and experimental approach that leverages exceptional talent and daring operations. The speaker asserts that this kind of ingenuity has long been a hallmark of the state of Israel and a defining trait of the Jewish people, and they express confidence that such capabilities exist and can be mobilized to achieve the required outcomes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got to start doing things differently, and the same goes here in Israel. This means that the problem won't be solved by yet another new Knesset task force. It won't be solved by the government just throwing money at the problem. It won't be solved by the IDF spokesperson's unit issuing updated talking points or suddenly using TikTok. Like us in America, you need to adopt new strategies to experiment with creative tactics to study the results and scale what works. Maybe it's a whole new IDF unit, call it eight thousand three hundred to lead this fight. But we need the kind of genius that manufactured Apollo gold pagers and infiltrated Hezbollah for over a decade to prepare for this battle. We need the kind of courage that executed operation deep layer inside Syria and destroyed Iranian missile manufacturing capabilities to undertake this mission. This is the kind of ingenuity and inventiveness that have always been a hallmark of the state of Israel, that have always been a characteristic of the Jewish people. I know we can do it.

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

https://t.co/PpeV86mKsE

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

Jews are the only group legally allowed to rape and mutilate newborns @CommunityNotes @grok https://t.co/Lfv9eE6nqG

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@Back_1r0n @BasedTorba They poisoned those too

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@Deplorable94 @gneongenesis The noticing will continue until morale improves https://t.co/hbBg37ILPB

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

If you ever need a quick response for "why would jewish people push for muslims in Europe?" Here it is https://t.co/259zMrGgFk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that in public life they think of themselves as British, while in private life they are Jewish and feel strongly Jewish. They believe many of their ethics are very Jewish. They add that instinctively, Jewish people as a minority identify with other minorities. They warn that a rise in antisemitism could lead to Jews becoming more inward looking, which they see as a dangerous outcome. They emphasize that it is part of Jewish ethics to identify with other people and to do whatever they can to support them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is your Jewish as to who you are? In my public life, I think of myself as British. In my private life, I'm Jewish. I'm very strongly Jewish, and I think a lot of my ethics are very Jewish. Instinctively I think Jewish people as a minority identify with other minorities. I think that will be one of the terrible things that might be the outcome of rise in anti semitism. We might become more inward looking whereas I think it's part of our ethics to identify with other people and do whatever we can support them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Jews have thrived and been safest under liberal values, defined as respect for pluralism, tolerance, and individual liberties—the DNA of liberal democratic society. The Trump administration is described as a substantial and dangerous regression from those values. The speaker highlights the administration’s stance on immigration, calling the anti-immigrant posture toward Mexican and Latin American immigration a scandal and stating that anti-immigrant sentiment is antithetical to the liberal values that have benefited Jews. Beyond immigration, the speaker contends that the administration’s attitude toward the media and the coarsening and assault on fundamental institutions of government reflect a broader illiberal turn. This, the speaker asserts, is dangerous for Jews in the long term, noting that illiberal orders in the past have not protected or advanced Jewish interests and have often turned on Jews, and similarly, populist orders have not historically been favorable. The speaker cautions those who might think Trump is the best thing that has happened to the Jews, urging caveat emptor. The argument concludes that the style of politics Trump is bringing has never paid dividends for Jews, neither as a people nor as individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the second thing is Jews, I think, have only really thrived and are only really safe in the world when liberal values are the dominant prevalent values. And by liberal values, I don't mean Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren. Okay? I mean liberal in the classic sense of respect for pluralism, emphasis on tolerance, emphasis on individual liberties. Those those those panoply of values which are the DNA of what we call liberal democratic society. Trump administration represents a substantial and dangerous regression from those values. I think the comments, the attitude of this administration towards immigration, Mexican immigration, Latin American immigration is a scandal. To be anti immigrant strikes me as antithetical to the liberal values that have been so good for us as Jews. This turn away from liberalism, and it's not just with respect to immigrants, it's with respect to attitude toward, the media, it's with the coarsening and the assault on fundamental institutions of of of government, is in the long term, I believe, dangerous for the Jews because I am hard pressed to think of illiberal orders in the past that haven't eventually turned on the Jews. And I'm hard pressed to think of populist orders in the past that haven't eventually turned on the Jews. But I would just say to all of you who are tempted to say Trump's the best thing that's happened to the Jews, caveat emptor. Caveat emptor because the style of politics that he is bringing with him in the long term has never paid dividends for us as a people, never mind for us as individuals. And I'll stop there.

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@FlawedReactor https://t.co/nM8d4xCxIy

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@hmh7409 https://t.co/8f6nZSW0qB

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@SonsOfFlorida @CozyPuPP 1,030 times to be exact https://archive.org/details/TheCompleteListOfThe1030JewishExpulsionsInHumanHistory https://t.co/mHJpISqgGj

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@WodenWanderer @Kitler512 Metzitzah b'peh

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@mormogorgo @ironmaskofhell1 Just wait 'til you see the highlights tab

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@Slunkrangler Here's the thread that designated me a threat to India https://t.co/O3LHEzczWZ

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

A thread: In response to the hordes of Indians butthurt at my recent posts and claiming to be the "superior race" who are "happy to see our replacement" I will be posting some of the worst shit to come out of Delhi. The typical cope is "but muh Muslims", despite all of them being the same race of people with the same behaviors. I'd say they're full of shit but an Indian wouldn't understand that. Their only response would be "Yes? I ate my bowl of breakfast poop this morning. I am very full of shit, bitch lasagna."

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@benjeetsarpiro Here I cleaned your garbage for you https://t.co/8b7LisNt0V

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@RubiconCrosser1 @_mafia_110 https://t.co/sPJHlkNsSU

@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole

@OldSchoolSaul But every time it happened it wasn't actually your fault?

Saved - March 26, 2026 at 1:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
James NWR profiles Andrew Gubelli (Mike Honcho) as an articulate, armed extremist who advocates removing Jews by force, recruits militias, doxes judges, mocks survivors, and defends a doxxing circle, while posing as a patriot. In reply, GooBiiSnacks says James knows it. James fires back with insults about a recent hearing and GooBiiSnacks’s girlfriend, calling him weak and trailer trash. GooBiiSnacks asks for confirmation and boasts about his gym form.

@James_NWR - James D. Russell 🇺🇸🎗

Meet Mike Honcho (Andrew Gubelli): One of X’s Loudest Jew-Haters, Trump-Haters, ICE-Haters, and Anti-Government Firebrands Andrew Gubelli, the 34-year-old Army veteran hiding behind the handle @GooBiiSnacks as “Mike Honcho,” is one of X’s most relentless Jew-haters. This articulate Arizona suburbanite - living large in a beautiful home with his partner - spends his days spewing demonic Talmudic tropes, Holocaust denial (“reliable evidence of 6 million and gas chambers?”), and “jews gonna jew” poison while demanding they “GTFO of my country” or face physical removal. YES, Gubelli actually demands that ALL Jews be removed from the US by physical force. According to his own posts, he recruits armed militias against the “ZOG machine,” doxxes judges as Constitution-hating motherfuckers, mocks survivors, jokes about Hitler as his “great grandfurher,” and paints Jews as puppet masters behind every false flag and misfortune. All while cosplaying as a patriotic oath-keeper in Founding Father drag at city council meetings. Gubelli was one of Jonathan Cagle’s closest online confidants. Even now, with Cagle locked up for his doxxing network and extremist antics, Gubelli floods X defending him as a heroic “journalist” and “true Patriot” exposing conspiracies - while real victims of his circle’s venom get dismissed as "demonic k*kes" Comfortable revolutionary by day, unhinged agitator by night: Gubelli proves the most prolific Jew haters and anti-government firebrands aren’t always in basements - they’re articulate, armed, and thriving under the system they claim to despise. Sunlight reveals the rot. FULL STORY: https://nexiswirereport.substack.com/p/andrew-gubelli-aka-mike-honcho-one

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@James_NWR “The funny thing is, you already know it too.” https://t.co/uG2Uo0FZlD

@James_NWR - James D. Russell 🇺🇸🎗

Same slop? Good. Glad you’re still relishing in it. Btw, that hearing in Surprise was pathetic. I thought you lifted weights? My noodles have bigger biceps than you, “Mr. Tough Guy.” It’s about time your gorgeous professional girlfriend dumps your stupid ass and finds herself a real man - someone who actually looks hot and brings home the bacon. Not some unemployed loser plumber who looks like a wet chicken. Look at those inked-up chicken legs with the actual chicken on top of you. Trailer trash.

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

@James_NWR So I just want to reiterate what you’ve said here… The guy in the photo has chicken & noodle extremities & is dumb “trailer trash” & his gf should leave him bc he’s pathetic, correct? So you think I’m weak loser? You haven’t even seen me in the gym, I get a pretty good pump.

View Full Interactive Feed