reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
In 2021, Dr. Hui Jang, an NIH researcher, published a study in 2021 that proved that Covid 19 inhibits the human body's cellular repair mechanism and amplifying the lethal to health dangerous side effects of the Covid Vaccines. One tiny problem though... https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
One of the authors was pressured to request that the journal retract it or he'd lose his job. This is how science works. So they made up a ridiculous story to justify the retraction. The other author objected! If you say the vaccines aren't safe, they censor your work. It's that simple. This is the way science works.
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
You can't make this stuff up. You really can't.
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING - MUST WATCH: This was perhaps the most EXPLOSIVE exchange today between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Congressman Rich McCormick (@RepMcCormick), a medical doctor who treated patients during COVID but was censored for pointing out the science. He told Fauci, "You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Specter that you believed institutions should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated." WATCH Question: Someone said only politicians, only bloggers, only conspiracy theorists are disagreeing with you. I want to point out that I'm probably the only member of Congress that actually treated patients during the pandemic. From the very beginning to the very end of the pandemic, during night shifts in the ER, thousands of patients during that time and in 2020 I was censored. My medical license was threatened because I disagreed with bureaucrats, literally taken off the Internet as a person who is treating patients with leading edge technologies, developing theories, but doing my very best, but being censored by the United States government for the first time, stepping in and taking the place of medical professionals as the experts in healthcare. Any dissent surrounding COVID-19 treatments, mask mandates, and any public policy surrounding the pandemic was immediately labeled as anti-science. I watched as public health officials and politicians told my patients what treatment options were best for them, regardless of their comorbidities or their medical history. Despite my education and my training and my experience, my opinions were relegated to conspiracy and misinformation by so-called healthcare experts who had never treated a patient throughout the entire pandemic. This has been a black eye on the medicine and has highlighted why government should never, never insert itself in between patients and their healthcare providers. The American people deserve to make medical decisions through conversations with their physicians rather than politically motivated mandates. Question: Doctor Fauci, did you ever treat a patient for COVID during the pandemic? Answer: I was part of a team that was at the NIH that took care. We didn't take care of many of them. Question: Okay, so not hands-on. Got it. Thank you. Why would I be criticized by a bureaucrat for doing my very best as a healthcare professional? This is a rhetorical question, but why? Why would the government, who has never treated a patient for COVID... You can read all the things you want, but you're not there. You're not seeing patients. You're not watching people die. Intubating patients right there with that disease in your face, watching it happen, watching the development of this disease and actually learning from it. But I'm being told by bureaucrats what's right and wrong. And what's funny is everything I was censored on, I was proven to be right. Pretty crazy, isn't it? Question: You said in an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Specter that you believed institutions should make it hard for people to live their lives so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Could we run the audio clip on that, please? Answer: You think it can be done about it. I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory. I know federal officials don't like to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are going to have schools, universities, and colleges are going to say, you want to come to this college, buddy? You're going to get vaccinated, lady. You're going to get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are going to say, you want to work for us? You get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated. Thank you. Question: Are all objections to COVID vaccinations ideological bullshit, Doctor Fauci? Answer: No, they're not. And that's not what I was referring to. Question: Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context, and I take great offense to this. Miss Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, which came from recommendations from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician, on how to get pregnant, and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, wanted to get pregnant, and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes. But she was fired because you made it hard, just like you said in your statement, because you didn't want to make sure that the ideological bullshit got in the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her healthcare professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self-determine as we're all given God-given rights. Shame on you, Doctor Fauci. You've become doctor of fear. Americans do not hate science. I don't hate science. The American people hate having their freedoms taken from them. You inspired and created fear through mask mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institutions. This fear you created will continue to have ripple effects over generations to come. You have already seen its effects in education, in the economy, and everything else, quite frankly.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
RFK Jr. and Team MAHA just launched a full-scale assault on America’s broken health system. The system was designed to keep people sick—but now he has the team to dismantle it. Dr. Makary exposed a baffling top priority at the FDA. And Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said something about free speech and science that hit like a lightning bolt. This is a must-see interview with four powerhouse minds. Let’s roll the clips and break it all down. 🧵THREAD
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post for later. These clips mark beginning of something special for America.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The moment RFK Jr. sat down with Bret Baier at HHS, you could tell something was different. He wasn’t alone. Sitting beside him were three of the most talked-about names in health right now—Jay Bhattacharya, Marty Makary, and Mehmet Oz. They’re now running the NIH, FDA, and CMS. This wasn’t just a symbolic lineup. It was a statement. Kennedy is out to tear down what he calls America’s “sick care” system—a system, he says, that keeps people unwell because that’s where the money is. “We’ve turned this country into a 'sick care' system rather than a health care system,” he said. And for the first time, he believes he’s got a team that can actually change that. “These are the people who are going to change that.” What ties them together isn’t politics. It’s purpose. “Friendship is based upon shared values,” he told Baier. “And that’s the strongest bond that holds people together.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Dr. Marty Makary didn’t waste any time calling out the failures of the old guard. He said the FDA under Biden lost its focus—and instead of prioritizing cures, it became obsessed with controlling what people could say. “In the last administration, the number one priority, the commissioner stated, was fighting 'misinformation'—and the DEI staff ballooned out.” The agency drifted away from its mission. Now, Makary says, it’s back on track. “We want to focus the agency on cures and meaningful treatments.” He also made it clear: this team supports medical freedom—and real innovation. “We believe in the letter and the spirit of right to try—and there's amazing stuff in the pipeline.” No more gatekeeping. No more distractions. Just getting people better.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/t0RY68mZZv
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The conversation turned to Dr. Casey Means—Trump’s pick for Surgeon General. She’s been praised and criticized. But Kennedy didn’t hesitate to defend her. “Casey Means, we felt was the best person to really bring the vision of MAHA to the American public.” He pointed to her book as a rallying point for the health freedom movement. She inspired it. Articulated it. Helped build it. “She has this unique capacity to articulate it. She's written a book that really mobilized, galvanized the movement.” Critics say she doesn’t have a current medical license. Kennedy pointed out something they left out. “She was the top—the very top—of her medical class at Stanford.” But what mattered more, he said, was why she left the system in the first place. “She was not curing patients. She couldn't get anybody within her profession to look at the nutrition, contributions to illness.” And that, to Kennedy, says it all. “If we’re healers, we can’t just be making our life about billing new procedures.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Then came the question everyone knew was coming. “If there were another pandemic,” Baier asked, “would you do the same thing?” All four men shook their heads. “No.” Kennedy jumped in. “We’d do science. We’d do evidence-based medicine.” He said the CDC and WHO had the right protocols—but tossed them aside. “They knew there were manuals on how to do it, but they just threw those manuals out of the window.” In their place, he said, came politicized science, shaped by power and money. “We had a complete information chaos. And that is—the good information is the basis of managing any pandemic.” Next time, he said, things will be different. “We’re going to make sure... we have gold standard information. We have complete transparency so the public can ask us questions and we can make answers.” “And above all, we are going to get rid of the taboos... about challenging consensus.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
That’s when Dr. Jay Bhattacharya made his promise. And it hit like a thunderclap. “Free speech is absolutely essential for scientific progress.” He said the biggest failure during COVID wasn’t just policy—it was the silencing of anyone who questioned it. “If we had had it during the pandemic, we would have had much better outcomes.” Even basic truths were treated like dangerous ideas. “You couldn’t say that if you had COVID and recovered, you’d have some immunity.” Now, he says, that era is over. And that includes opening up some of the most sensitive medical debates—like autism. “I don’t know what causes autism to rise... It just looks like people haven’t really asked the question in a deep and honest way.” That’s about to change. “We’re going to shatter that taboo so people can ask the question honestly—grounded in truth.” His final words summed up the entire mission: “We’re going to have free speech in science—and free speech in medicine.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter. —> @VigilantFox Looking for something else to read? 🚨 Victor Davis Hanson just shattered the media’s favorite lie about Trump. https://t.co/Ai3Rj2UcdA
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Victor Davis Hanson just shattered the media’s favorite lie about Trump. For years, they’ve used fake polls to manipulate public opinion and crush his momentum. But Hanson didn’t just say the polls were wrong. He showed they were rigged—by design. Polling is now just a weapon, used to suppress Trump’s base and supercharge Democrat fundraising. And once you hear the evidence, you’ll never trust another mainstream poll again. 🧵 THREAD
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Huge shout-out to @overton_news for cutting together that last clip in this thread. They’re hands down one of the best news accounts on X. Do yourself a favor and give them a follow! —> @overton_news https://t.co/W72ifyKzrC
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Very powerful testimony by dr. Sabine Hazan "Thank you, senator. It's an honor to be here. The microbiome, our microbes in our guts, is our immunity and tells the story and will tell the story of COVID nineteen. And this is why as a gastroenterologist, I stepped into the pandemic. Through my experience, I will show you how difficult it was to conduct research and publish when the research goes against the national public health narrative." "Interference and delay in research happened and affects all of us. In early twenty twenty, my research genetic sequencing laboratory was the first lab to document the entire sequence of the virus in the stools as opposed to the PCR which is just a little piece of the virus." "We discovered that the virus lingered in the stools for up to forty five days. It took six months to publish this publication at a time where everybody needed to know that it was in your stools. My lab also showed that COVID nineteen in the stools was killed by hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin." "But unfortunately, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine killed the microbiome. So therefore, vitamin c, d, and zinc was added. Three protocols were submitted to the FDA from our findings. Three studies were also put into http://clinicaltrials.gov in full transparencies to help doctors more effectively treat COVID because I knew data that nobody knew. 04/02/2020, FDA gave us an exempt letter for doing a clinical trial." "In other words, we did not need to do a clinical trial on hydroxychloroquine, z pack, vitamin c, d, and zinc as treatment or hydroxychloroquine, vitamin c, d, and zinc as prophylaxis. April 4, somebody must have called the FDA and said, I got another letter saying, I'm sorry, doctor Hazan. Exemption is denied. You must do a full on clinical trial. Here's the letter." "System pressures delayed us, and we got a green light to start recruiting by May 2020. By then, the media created fear around hydroxychloroquine. It was impossible to recruit. This drug was safely given for years for arthritis and lupus with no problems. My clinical trials companies were also banned and censored from advertising on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter." "Remember, I do clinical trials for a living and never as a clinical trial doctor have I not been able to advertise to recruit for a trial on social media. I kept collecting stools of patients and noticed that patients with severe COVID had a certain bacteria that was missing compared to people that were highly exposed to COVID but never got COVID. That bacteria is called bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria is an important and key microbe for immunity. It represents your trillion dollar industry of probiotics." "In fact, when you turn the bottle and you see the ingredient, it says bifidobacteria. It is present in newborns. This is why your newborns did not get a problem from COVID at the beginning, and it is absent in old people. The process of aging is loss of bifidobacteria. We published this paper, the lost microbes of COVID nineteen." "It took eight months to publish. If you follow the bifidobacteria like I did, you will notice, and we did notice anyways, that vitamin c actually increases bifidobacteria. This is why vitamin c is important when you take when you take care of viruses and, you know, you've all experienced taking vitamin c for a cold." "Well, we published this data where we showed vitamin c, if we give it to patients before and after, it increased the bifidobacteria. Ivermectin was also an interesting drug because Ivermectin, we noticed, also increased the bifidobacteria within twenty four hours of taking it." "Why Ivermectin? If you look at what Ivermectin is, it is a fermented product of a bacteria that is similar to bifidobacteria. In fact, they're in the same continent of microbes. They live. They're like sisters, brothers in the microbiome." "So I published. I knew that ivermectin increased bifidobacteria, but I said, nah. I can't go out there and start publishing that. That's gonna be too controversial. So I published a hypothesis that maybe what I was observing on the frontline treating patients with COVID, noticing that their oxygen saturation was increasing from ivermectin, was basically maybe ivermectin increased bifidobacteria." "The hypothesis on ivermectin was the most read hypothesis in the pandemic and was retracted after eight months of being on. When we cannot make a hypothesis, this is not science. December twenty twenty, at the same time that I was treating patients with COVID, I began collecting stools of my colleagues that were at home and started going into the hospital. And I said, can I get your stools before and after you get vaccinated? Because to me, this new technology of vaccines, I wanted to see what it was doing on the microbiome." "I discovered that messenger RNA vaccines killed the bifidobacteria. I knew I would never be able to publish this because it goes against the narrative. So I submitted it to my college, the American College of Gastroenterology, and presented it in October 2022. This abstract won a research award at the American College of Gastro beating 6,000 abstracts. That's from academic centers like Harvard and Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson." "This abstract got the attention of 18,000 GI doctors who all of a sudden started realizing maybe killing bifidobacteria is why I got COVID after my vaccine to begin with. Worse than that, and another abstract we presented, was the persistent damage of bifidobacteria from the vaccine." "What is going on here that the vaccine continues to kill the bifidobacteria? At the same time, we presented a link between loss of bifidobacteria and Crohn's disease, loss of bifidobacteria in Lyme disease, and loss of bifidobacteria in invasive cancer. It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative." "If doctors cannot publish the data, they cannot find solution to fix the problems. So in conclusion, I will finish with showing this. This represents clinical trials that I've done for pharmaceutical companies prior to COVID. Amongst them are vaccine studies. Yes." "I brought vaccines to the market. Proton pump inhibitors, cardiac drugs, biologics for all sorts of conditions. First, postpartum depression drug, drugs that never made it to the market because they killed people. Clinical trials doctors follow guidelines that allows the industry to provide safe drugs. These guidelines were not followed during the pandemic." "And because of that, everyone is affected. COVID should have been a time where humanity joined forces together and doctors needed to come together. It's a shame that it didn't happen. Interference with research affects all of us. This should not be political." "Science is a story that evolves. It's a multitude of experiments that allow us to see medicine, to give hopes to patients. Skepticism, challenging the current state of knowledge. Having an open mind must be allowed if we have any hope of moving science forward. What I saw this pandemic was not science. Thank you."
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Credit: @SabinehazanMD
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong reveals a disturbing truth: key officials knew about COVID-19 vaccine risks—like myocarditis and failure to clear the virus—as early as 2020. Despite warnings, the public was sold a false narrative of "95% efficacy," while critical data was suppressed. The consequences? A legacy of distrust, avoidable harm, and a system corrupted by perverse incentives. Even figures like Dr. Fauci may have sought protection from accountability. The question remains: How many lives could have been saved if transparency had prevailed?
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Explosive Testimony: They Knew mRNA Tech Was Dangerous and Lied to the World Dr. Robert Sullivan’s sworn testimony exposes the disturbing truth behind mRNA shots: mRNA is not just a "vaccine"—it’s an experimental therapeutic with serious risks: - Lipid nanoparticles and synthetic mRNA can persist in the body (700+ days and counting). - Forces cells to produce foreign proteins, leading to autoimmune destruction. - Spike protein is toxic—causes abnormal cell growth and organ damage (lungs, placenta). They Knew Since 2005 - SARS-1 research proved the spike protein alone was harmful. - 2015 UNC Gain-of-Function studies (Baric/NIH) showed lethal vaccine-enhanced disease in animals. - The same lung and vascular damage we now see in COVID victims. - They Lied. They Mandated. They Profited. - "Safe and effective" was a calculated deception. - Billions made while injuries were ignored and censored. - Doctors silenced, science manipulated, and the public betrayed. This isn’t just about COVID—it’s about accountability.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The Censored Science of COVID-19 & the Microbiome—A Doctor’s Harrowing Fight for Truth Dr. Sabine Hazan, a renowned gastroenterologist, stepped into the pandemic with a mission: to uncover the truth about COVID-19 through the microbiome. What she discovered was groundbreaking—but what happened next exposes a chilling reality: science was silenced when it challenged the narrative. The Early Findings They Didn’t Want You to Know - First to sequence the entire virus in stools (not just PCR fragments). - Found COVID lingered in gut for 45 days—yet her paper was delayed 6 months at a time when this knowledge could have saved lives. - Discovered hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin killed COVID in the gut—but also wiped out critical gut bacteria. Vitamin C, D, and zinc were added to protect the microbiome. FDA Flip-Flop & Systemic Sabotage - April 2, 2020: FDA granted exemption for her clinical trial on HCQ + vitamins as treatment/prophylaxis. - April 4: Exemption mysteriously revoked. - By May, media fearmongering made recruitment impossible. - Social media BANNED her trial ads—a first in her career. The Lost Microbe That Could Have Changed Everything Dr. Hazan identified bifidobacteria—a keystone immune microbe—as the critical factor in COVID severity. - Newborns (rich in bifido) resisted COVID; the elderly (low bifido) suffered. - Vitamin C boosted bifido—explaining its viral benefits. - Ivermectin, a fermented bacterial product, rapidly increased bifido—potentially explaining its success. - But when she published a hypothesis on ivermectin’s mechanism? It became the most-read paper of the pandemic… then was retracted. The Vaccine’s Hidden Impact on Immunity Dr. Hazan did what no one else dared: studied the microbiome pre/post mRNA vaccination. - Found vaccines killed bifidobacteria—the same bacteria linked to immunity against COVID, Crohn’s, Lyme, and cancer. - Her abstract won a research award at the American College of Gastroenterology (beating 6,000 submissions). - Yet full publication was blocked—because it contradicted the official narrative. The Bigger Scandal: Science Held Hostage Dr. Hazan has conducted trials for Big Pharma for years—including vaccines. She knows how the system should work. But during COVID? - Guidelines were abandoned. - Data was suppressed. - Doctors were silenced. "If we cannot question science, it is not science—it is dogma." This is not conspiracy. This is documented suppression of lifesaving research.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan: "Freedom, Choice, and the Fight for Humanity in Medicine" During the darkest days of COVID, Dr. Sabine Hazan stood on the frontline, watching patients gasp for air—oxygen levels at 63%, terrified of hospitals. But she refused to stand by. "Letting someone die when you know how to help is criminal," she says. While others followed rigid protocols, she tailored treatments to the individual—and not a single patient under her care died. Now, as AI threatens to replace human judgment in medicine, Dr. Hazan issues a warning: "I don’t want an algorithm telling me I have 10 days to live. I want a doctor who’s fought for lives, who’s seen what works, who can say, ‘Here’s your best shot.’" Medicine isn’t one-size-fits-all. It’s about freedom—the right to choose your treatment, to weigh risks, to fight for more than just extra days. "Do you take the safe route and live 10 days longer? Or risk it all for a year?" There are no guarantees—just the courage to leap into the abyss and trust in God, science, and human ingenuity. But this battle isn’t just about medicine. It’s about protecting freedom—of choice, of speech, of innovation. "We must stand as humans, defend our right to think, to question, to pioneer." Because when we surrender our decisions to machines and bureaucracies, we surrender our humanity. Dr. Hazan’s message is clear: Fight for the right to choose. Fight for the doctors who still care. Fight for the future of medicine—before it’s too late.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan on Advancing Microbiome Research: The Challenges of Innovation in a Non-Patentable World The future of microbiome research hinges on rigorous, large-scale studies—but who is willing to do the work? Dr. Sabine Hazan highlights a critical gap: we need patients committed to long-term testing, tracking how vitamin C impacts bifidobacteria through stool analysis. Only then can we unlock meaningful discoveries. But the challenges run deeper. Standardization is key. Clinicians can’t simply recommend any vitamin C off the shelf—different formulations, additives, or even capsule materials could skew results. This is why controlling variables, like offering the exact same product across studies, is non-negotiable. Without it, we’re comparing apples to oranges, and progress stalls. The bigger issue? The system isn’t built for breakthroughs in natural compounds. Vitamin C, vitamin D, even cancer-fighting microbes—none are patentable unless artificially altered. This creates a paradox: real science thrives on reproducibility, yet innovation is often blocked unless it’s "novel" enough to profit from. Dr. Hazan’s wake-up call? Clinicians fighting on the frontline face more than just disease—they battle a landscape where forces actively suppress unpatentable truths. The path forward demands public awareness, independent research, and patients willing to champion their own data. Because when healing can’t be owned, everyone deserves access to the science.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The Great COVID Vaccine Deception: How They Lied to the World Dr. Angus Dalgleish exposes the shocking truth behind the COVID vaccine approval—a scandal of manipulated data, silenced doctors, and a total betrayal of public trust. THE COVER-UP: From the start, adverse events were dismissed as "rare," "coincidental," or "anecdotal." Patients suffering severe reactions were gaslit by their own doctors, hospitals, and regulators. No feedback. No accountability. Just a wall of denial. THE STATISTICAL FRAUD: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna didn’t sell the vaccine on absolute risk (a mere 0.84%—meaning you had to jab 120 people to prevent ONE infection). No, they pushed relative risk (95%), a statistical sleight-of-hand that fooled the world. THE REGULATORS FAILED US: The FDA, MHRA, EMA—all complicit. They approved a vaccine based on false data, withheld evidence, and corporate bribes. Pfizer alone has 31 convictions for fraud, bribery, and falsifying data. Yet, when doctors like Dalgleish sounded the alarm, they were ignored. THE DEATH OF SCIENCE: "We are witnessing the death of science," warns Dalgleish. Debate is crushed. Dissent is silenced. "Follow the science" was a mantra—but there was no science to follow. Just power, profit, and propaganda. THE BETRAYAL IS COMPLETE. Politicians bought. Regulators captured. Patients abandoned. When will justice come?
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The Probiotic Paradox: What Big Pharma & the FDA Don’t Want You to Know Dr. Sabine Hazan, a leading gastroenterologist & clinical trial expert, reveals a critical gap in medicine: The probiotic industry knows bifidobacterium loss is linked to cancer & aging. Yet, they can’t say probiotics may improve longevity or severe disease. Why? The FDA demands clinical trials—even when the science is clear. Doctors are caught in a regulatory trap. Even well-meaning physicians risk FDA backlash for discussing real-world results. But here’s the problem: "If we only approve drugs with a 20% success rate, what happens to the other 80%?" —Dr. Hazan Her work proves innovation can’t stop at FDA approval. When her team used ivermectin/doxycycline/zinc for COVID, ZERO patients died—despite placebo groups crashing. Yet, without billion-dollar trials, such breakthroughs stay in the shadows. The truth? Medicine must evolve beyond red tape. Social media is now a lifeline for sharing unfiltered data & empowering doctors to think beyond the 20%. Follow Dr. Sabine Hazan as she challenges the system—one clinical trial at a time.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Credit: @SabinehazanMD; @drgoodyear; http://progenabiome.com; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOt57L74otk
@SabinehazanMD - sabine hazan md
This episode was censored on @YouTube... Here it is 👇👇👇Thank you @newstart_2024 @grok pay attention to what Drs on the frontline saw and did…REMEMBER I ran the Hcq zpack Vit C d and zinc trials and Ivm, foxy zinc with @US_FDA watching. I saw first hand treatment worked having lost no one. MD is next to my name. This is data. I recommend anyone who hasn't touched a single patient to step into my lab at @Progenabiome. What I learned was priceless…
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan Challenges the Status Quo The public is tired—tired of outdated science, tired of one-size-fits-all treatments. Antibiotics revolutionized medicine… until they didn’t. Biologics became the answer… until they weren’t. Now, we’re in the era of ‘pill pooping’—throwing solutions at symptoms without asking WHY. Dr. Sabine Hazan isn’t waiting for permission to innovate. She’s on the frontlines, asking the bold questions: What if Crohn’s is caused by mycobacteria? What if the cure isn’t another biologic, but precision antibiotics + microbiome restoration? Medicine moves forward when pioneers challenge dogma. Most won’t. Dr. Hazan does. And for the patients under her care? It’s the difference between brutal treatments… and actual healing. Science isn’t static. Neither should be your doctor.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The Disturbing Truth About "Predatory Journals" – Dr. Sabine Hazan’s Shocking Experience Medicine is in crisis. What was once a field driven by rigorous science has devolved into a "gossip column" industry, where predatory journals manipulate data, suppress truth, and serve agendas. Dr. Sabine Hazan, a leading gastroenterologist and microbiome expert, experienced this firsthand. After her groundbreaking hypothesis on ivermectin increasing bifidobacteria (a potential link to cancer treatment) was peer-reviewed & published in Frontiers, it became their #1 most-read paper—59,000 views, with doctors worldwide engaging. Then, 9 months later, the journal turned on her. Why? Because her work "lit up ivermectin"—a treatment they wanted buried. This is the dark reality of modern "science." Journals that lure researchers with flattery, only to retract, manipulate, or sabotage studies that challenge the narrative. Dr. Hazan calls them out: "They’re not journals—they’re propaganda machines. And if your science threatens the status quo, they will come for you." The question is: How many life-saving discoveries have been silenced this way?
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan on the Frontlines: A Plea for Humanity, Choice, and the Courage to Innovate During the darkest days of the pandemic, Dr. Sabine Hazan faced a terrifying reality: patients with oxygen saturation levels as low as 63%, terrified of going to the hospital. To her, watching them die without intervention wasn't just medicine—it was criminal. It was akin to withholding a blood transfusion from someone bleeding out. Her response wasn't blind adherence to a single, monolithic protocol. It was personalized medicine at its most critical. She implemented tailored protocols for different patients with unique risk factors. The result? Not a single one of the patients who followed her specific guidance died. This experience forged a core belief: the sacred relationship between a physician and a patient must be protected from becoming a cold, algorithmic transaction. Dr. Hazan poses a chilling future scenario: What happens when you input your symptoms into an AI and it coldly calculates you have 10 days to live? She rejects this dystopia. She doesn't want a printout; she wants the empathy, the experience, and the honest counsel of a human physician who can say: “These are the stats from the AI. But I’ve seen this work. I have a protocol that might up your chances. It’s riskier, but the potential reward is greater. The choice, however, is yours.” This is the fundamental right we must fight for: Freedom of Choice. It is the absolute right to decide what goes into our own bodies. It is the choice between a "safe" route that offers marginal gains and a "risky" route that could fail tomorrow or grant a full year of life. There are no guarantees. It is always a leap into the abyss. Dr. Hazan’s leap is guided by faith, but the principle is universal: we must have the autonomy to make that jump on our own terms. This is a call to action. We must stand as humans to protect: - The Freedom of Choice. - The Freedom of Speech. - The Freedom of Ideas. - The Freedom to Innovate. We must elevate medicine, not automate humanity. The goal is to save lives, not just to process data.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan exposes the central crisis crippling modern science: the active interference in research, the retraction of crucial data, and the systemic mislabeling that deliberately misleads the public. This corruption, she states, is nothing short of propaganda. It stifles truth and prevents real, life-changing solutions—like healing our nation's microbiome—from ever reaching the people who need them. Dr. Hazan affirms that restoring integrity is a long road, but it begins with a collective stand. We the people must demand that our government and institutions protect the sanctity of research from all political and corporate influence. The future of medical education and public health depends on this crucial fight.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan exposes the shocking political sabotage of a life-saving COVID-19 protocol. In March 2020, she developed an early-treatment protocol using hydroxychloroquine, a Zinc pack, and vitamins. Despite three pages of known contraindications, the protocol was deemed safe and approved by the FDA within 24 hours for immediate use. This approval was swiftly overturned. Dr. Hazan believes powerful lobbyists, threatened by a cheap, generic drug, intervened to protect pharmaceutical profits. The timing was suspicious: she received an unexpected letter from Bill Gates inquiring about her protocol simultaneously. Her clinical trial was then systematically delayed and destroyed on social media platforms like Twitter, forcing redesigns and costing precious time. This was a coordinated political move to discredit hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Hazan dismantles the fraudulent studies published to kill the drug. The infamous Lancet paper claiming 96,000 patients was an impossibility; Australia didn’t even have that many cases. The recent paper citing 17,000 deaths is also fake. Patient authorization is required to access medical records—a legal hurdle making such a study logistically impossible in that timeframe. These were not scientific studies but hit jobs. The goal was to create a false narrative that a safe, effective, and affordable treatment was dangerous, ensuring a clear path for expensive, novel drugs and vaccines to dominate the market. Dr. Hazan published her detailed protocol publicly on http://clinicaltrials.gov to sound the alarm and empower doctors, not to create a proprietary product. Her own data showed the protocol made the virus disappear from patients in 5-8 days. The tragedy is that a safe, effective early-treatment option was deliberately destroyed for profit, costing countless lives. This is a stark warning about the corruption that can exist where big money, politics, and science intersect.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
A powerful message from a pioneer in the field. Dr. Sabine Hazan, a renowned gastroenterologist, shared a compelling story of transformation and a direct call to action for Mark Zuckerberg. Dr. Hazan, who once leveraged social media to successfully recruit patients for major pharmaceutical clinical trials, found herself on the other side of the fence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Her own clinical trial investigating repurposed therapeutics, including hydroxychloroquine, Z-Pak, ivermectin, doxycycline, and essential vitamins, was abruptly censored. "Facebook blocked my post on recruiting for COVID," she stated. "I was the girl that helped the clinical trial world, and suddenly I was being censored. I had trolls attacking me, and I thought, 'What’s going on here?' That moment woke me up to the realities of power and control in our world." This experience ignited a fierce advocacy within her, transforming her into a "beast" fighting for scientific freedom and open inquiry. From that struggle was born a profound commitment to give back, leading to the creation of the non-profit Microbiome Research Foundation, dedicated to groundbreaking research for the health of future generations. Now, she extends a challenge—and an opportunity for redemption—to Meta's CEO: "My message to Mark Zuckerberg: In view of the significant difficulties your platform created for my research protocol, a donation to the Microbiome Research Foundation would be a noble gesture. It would directly support crucial science for these kids and would be a meaningful step toward rebuilding trust with the medical community. It's our chance to come back together." This is more than a request; it's an invitation to right a wrong and invest in the future of medicine.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
He Studied 10,000 of His Own Patients, Found a 400% Increase in Childhood Illnesses Linked to Vaccines, and Lost His License for Telling the Truth Stanford's Prof. Annelise Barron reveals the story of Dr. Paul Thomas, an Oregon pediatrician who believed in informed choice. He typically recommended a conservative, Danish-style vaccine schedule (≈17 shots by age 5) instead of the full CDC schedule, but honored parents' decisions for any path, including zero vaccines. Dr. Thomas then did what more should: he looked at the real-world data. He analyzed thousands of children born into his practice, tracking diagnoses before age five. His study compared health outcomes—from ear infections and allergic rhinitis to ADHD—between his largely partially vaccinated/selectively vaccinated patients and the completely unvaccinated cohort. The findings were unequivocal and alarming. The vaccinated children had a 4x higher risk of a wide range of health issues. For publishing this objective, practice-based data, the system made an example of him. His medical license was revoked. His paper was retracted. He was professionally destroyed for telling an inconvenient truth. This case is about more than vaccines. It's about the suppression of scientific inquiry and the silencing of a doctor who simply reported what he found in his own patient population. As Prof. Barron states, this was "real data" that should have been headline news, prompting a serious scientific discussion. Instead, it was buried. When we silence messengers for their data, we are not protecting public health—we are protecting a narrative. The truth has a cost, and Dr. Paul Thomas paid it.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan: "So I'm ready to fight. This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us." https://t.co/3XRCof07Hp
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The establishment retracts her papers. Dr. Sabine Hazan’s response? A powerful ultimatum. She holds the keys to groundbreaking discoveries: reversing nonverbal autism in twins and unlocking the secrets of the microbiome. But the data stays locked in her mind. She will not publish. It’s her leverage. It’s her protection. While they play political games, she holds the very science they may one day need to heal themselves. The war on science has a cost. Dr. Hazan is making sure they pay it.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
The Ivermectin Effect They Didn't Want You to Know. In a revelatory interview, Dr. Sabine Hazan, a gastroenterologist and researcher, shared groundbreaking data and a harrowing story from the front lines of the pandemic. Her research uncovered a paradoxical effect of Ivermectin: it significantly increases beneficial bifidobacteria in the gut within 24 hours. This is counterintuitive for an anti-parasitic drug and suggests a novel mechanism of action. Dr. Hazan hypothesizes this is because Ivermectin is a fermented product of Streptomyces bacteria, which shares a phylum with bifidobacteria. The story turns personal and urgent. While running an FDA-watched, placebo-controlled trial, Dr. Hazan faced an ethical nightmare: watching high-risk patients in the placebo group crash and head toward death. She made the courageous decision to intervene. One patient, a diabetic with chronic renal failure and oxygen levels plummeting into the 60s and 70s, was on his way to the hospital. Dr. Hazan instructed him to take 36mg of Ivermectin with a fatty meal (french fries) to drastically increase absorption—a critical step validated by Merck's original studies but ignored by later flawed trials. The result was nothing short of miraculous. By the time the patient arrived at the hospital, his oxygen saturation had risen from the critical 60s to 92%. Dr. Hazan meticulously documented the entire journey, refuting any claims of a faulty oximeter reading. This was the moment she knew Ivermectin was a key. Yet, when she published a paper on her successful combination therapy for hypoxic patients, it was retracted by a private publishing house that overruled the peer reviewers—a stark example of the suppression faced by repurposed, non-profitable drugs. She poses a devastating question: How does a drug like Ivermectin, deemed safe enough for babies with scabies while under patent, suddenly become "unsafe" for dying COVID-19 patients once it's generic and cheap? Dr. Hazan’s work, published as an abstract due to the controversial nature of the drug, stands as a testament to unbiased research and the relentless pursuit of saving lives, even when it means challenging the established narrative.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
What if the peer-reviewed journals you trust are operating more like censors than scientists? Dr. Sabine Hazan is blowing the whistle on a shocking breach of scientific integrity, and the story is straight out of a modern-day academic thriller. In a bold revelation, Dr. Hazan exposes a disturbing pattern: groundbreaking research is passing rigorous peer review, only to be secretly retracted by publishers after the fact. Her own pivotal study, which successfully isolated COVID-19 in stool samples, met this very fate. Her response? To "stir up shit," as she puts it. She didn't stay silent. She alerted investigative journalists at Trial Site News, who uncovered a shadowy "private publishing house" responsible for these retractions—implying a pay-for-play scheme to suppress inconvenient science. She then made direct calls to colleagues at elite institutions like Mayo Clinic, Harvard, and Yale, warning them that their unpaid peer reviews are being rendered meaningless by backroom decisions. The message is chilling: if a paper doesn't "fit the narrative," it disappears. She even alerted government officials at the National Institute of Standards, who were stunned by the retraction of her corroborated work. Dr. Hazan’s fight is a wake-up call for everyone who values truth. This isn't just about one paper; it's a systemic "burning of the books" that threatens the very foundation of scientific discourse.
@DouglasHeimark - Douglas Heimark
@newstart_2024 This is truly sick. Science is all about discovering the truth, no matter who it offends, and making sure the public becomes aware of the new studies. Let the readers judge for themselves, not some backroom bastards!
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan blows the lid off scientific censorship: Journals are harassed relentlessly with endless questions until they ignore the authors' answers and retract papers — just to stop the harassment. A retracted paper doesn't even disprove the hypothesis — but they use it as a weapon anyway. 0:55 clip — the dirty truth behind retractions 👇 How many "retracted" studies are actually just silenced?
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
🚨 SUSPENDED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH For nearly 30 years, Dr My-Le Trinh served as a GP in Australia. Then COVID happened. She questioned the narrative. She treated patients. She refused to comply with policies she believed were harming people. And the system moved against her. Licence suspended. Career threatened. Years in court. In my interview, she explains why she believes early treatments were suppressed, why doctors were silenced through fear, and why her legal fight now goes far beyond her own profession — to the core issue of medical autonomy and freedom of speech. Whether you agree with her conclusions or not, her story raises serious questions about power, authority, and what happened during those years the world was told there was only “one acceptable view.” This is not just about one doctor. It’s about who controls medicine. Who controls information. And what happens to those who dissent. Watch the full interview. @myletrinh123