reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @uTobian

uTobian
Posted - January 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 1:48 PM

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

Dr. Brittany Todd explains things so clearly (link to original in the replies).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine, if you will, we're trying to figure out if smoking causes lung cancer. Bear with me. We know smoking causes lung cancer. But in the 1950s, they didn't believe smoking caused lung cancer. So let's say they decided to do a study to see if smoking causes lung cancer. The most obvious thing to do would be comparing smokers and non smokers to look at their lung cancer rates. Let's say instead they decide to study someone who smokes two packs a day compared to someone who smokes three packs of cigarettes per day. And in the end, both have the same rates of lung cancer. And they say, see, smoking doesn't cause lung cancer. Okay. That wasn't fair. It was smoking against smoking. Okay. So now they decide to test, well, let's look at this brand of cigarettes compared to that brand of cigarettes. And look, they both had the same rate of lung cancer. Yeah, but they were both still smokers. Now they look at it and they say, Okay, well, let's look at the people who live in this town and smoke three packs a day and compare it to the people who live across the country in this town and smoke three packs a day. And say, there's no difference in lung cancer rates. Well, yeah, because they still all smoke. They all smoke. And the only way to find out whether or not smoking causes lung cancer is if you compare it to people who don't smoke. Those are the vaccine studies right now. The ones that say vaccines don't cause chronic disease, vaccines don't cause autism. Did they look at vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children? No. They looked at vaccinated children compared to different vaccinated children. They got MMR. They got DTaP. They got seven vaccine in one visit. They got five vaccines in one visit. They got four milligrams of aluminum. They got two milligrams of aluminum. But they never looked at vaccinated versus unvaccinated children to look at the actual outcome. That's how absurd this whole thing is. It's not hard. If you can see it in the lung cancer study example, then you can see it in the vaccine examples. And if you can't see it, I don't know how to make you see it. All we're asking is for a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study and someone brave enough to publish it because I know there's the Henry Ford trial, but no one's published it. We don't actually have access to the actual data. So someone has to be brave enough to do the study and publish the data. And if you think vaccines are great and they don't cause all these chronic diseases, then just do the study. Then just do it and prove us wrong.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

https://www.instagram.com/p/DTPAMMIjDlW/

Instagram instagram.com

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@Behm7Janet Is she on X?

SenseReceptor
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Saved - November 3, 2025 at 4:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
SenseReceptor shares a clip where Toby Rogers argues modern “biological colonialism” uses vaccines to extract wealth via iatrogenic injury, citing autism costs and Covid vaccine harms, contrasting with historic colonialism. The discussion references a Brownstone Institute event with Jeffrey Tucker, Brianne Dressen, and Father John Naugle. @uTobian adds a link to a longer exposition and receives thanks from SenseReceptor and others.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

MIND-BLOWING 🤯 Toby Rogers explains how our governments are maiming/killing us with jabs for the sake of "biological colonialism" "At some point there were no new lands left to conquer...[so] how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury" This clip of Rogers (@uTobian) is taken from a discussion with Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreyatucker), Brianne Dressen (@BrianneDressen), and Father John Naugle (@FatherNaugle) at the Brownstone Institute's (@brownstoneinst) 5th Annual Conference and Gala. The video was posted to The Epoch Times YouTube channel on November 1, 2025. Per the Children's Health Defense website: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last 500 years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe, to the New World, and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how the UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for 500 years. 500 years of colonialism. "And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. And then more recently, with the backing of the US Military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically, for 500 years, that's been the pattern. "Here's the problem: At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited, were the middle class in the United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. "So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take Covid shots and you can injure them, you can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5 million to $7 million per kid. That's a lot of money. And it goes somewhere, and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. "And so with COVID shots, what we have is, so picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California, who gets a Covid shot and then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She, she's in and out of the hospital, she's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her health care costs are going to be in the range of about $2 million. And that all goes to pharma doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. "If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her, the most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually, perish. The old model of colonialism, right? But in five to 10 years in the US you can squeeze $2 million out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a Covid shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for 10 years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family, and then after 10 years, the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. "So the crisis that we're in right now, and why we're all just traumatized all the time, is that western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic. And the response and the junk science Covid shots."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last five hundred years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe to the New World and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how The UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for five hundred years. Five hundred years of colonialism. And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and The United States. And then more recently with the backing of the US military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically for five hundred years that's been the pattern. Here's the problem. At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited were the middle class in The United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take COVID shots. And you can injure them. You can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism, lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5,000,000 to $7,000,000 per kid. That's a lot of money and it goes somewhere and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex and the ruling class. And so with COVID shots, what we have is, picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California who gets a COVID shot. And then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She's in and out of the hospital. She's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are going to be in the range of about $2,000,000 And that all goes to pharma, doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her. The most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually perish, the old model of colonialism, right? But in five to ten years in The US, you can squeeze $2,000,000 out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a COVID shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for ten years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family and then after ten years the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. So the crisis that we're in right now and why we're all just traumatized all the time is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class and lower classes in The United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@SenseReceptor Here's a longer exposition on my "biological colonialism" argument: https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/did-liberalism-fail

Did liberalism fail? This is one of the most urgent questions facing the world today and it is surprisingly difficult to answer. tobyrogers.substack.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@uTobian You're doing amazing work, Toby! Thanks for helping us put all the pieces together.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@SenseReceptor Thank you!!! 🙌

uTobian
Posted - October 7, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 9:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The pharmaceutical industry manipulates vaccine safety studies by misdefining key terms like inert, placebo, and double-blind randomized controlled trial. I've got the evidence. Understanding original sources and definitions is crucial for accurate conclusions.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

The pharmaceutical industry rigs vaccine safety studies by lying about the definitions of three key terms — inert, placebo, and double-blind randomized controlled trial. I've got the receipts: https://t.co/1KDIP2ux6a

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Inert should mean that the substance does not cause a chemical or biological reaction in the body." "Paul Offit routinely calls mercury and aluminum inert even though they are known neurotoxicants." "Philip Grandjean and Philip Langegon, they're the best two toxicologists in the world. They published a study in 2014 that says both aluminum and ethyl mercury are known neurotoxicants." "In the context of vaccines, placebo should mean saline as verified by independent third party testing." "FDA has no regulations concerning the contents of placebos." "manufacturers can put whatever they want into the comparator intervention and can still call it a placebo by law." "A double blind randomized controlled trial should have two groups." "That's not what the supporters of the status quo mean when they say randomized control trial." "That's why we're in this mess. That's why we have an autism and chronic disease epidemic in this country."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In PhD programs, you have to read original sources, and you have to define terms. Let's be crystal clear about the definitions of these terms, because the fate of the republic depends on getting these definitions right. And Doctor. Scott is playing fast and loose with these definitions. So let's be crystal clear about what we mean. Inert should mean that the substance does not cause a chemical or biological reaction in the body. When supporters of the status quo use the word inert, they can mean just about anything. Paul Offit routinely calls mercury and aluminum inert even though they are known neurotoxicants. Philip Grandjean and Philip Langegon, they're the best two toxicologists in the world. They published a study in 2014 that says both aluminum and ethyl mercury are known neurotoxicants. But the supporters of the status quo say that these things are safe. And they're not. They're absolutely not. In the context of vaccines, placebo should mean saline as verified by independent third party testing. That's not what the supporters of the status quo mean when they say placebo. The fact is the FDA has no regulations concerning the contents of placebos. So manufacturers can put whatever they want into the comparator intervention and can still call it a placebo by law. Furthermore, scientific journals have no regulations concerning the contents of placebos. Sometimes the manufacturers disclose them in connection with the study, And about two thirds of the time they do not. And a double blind randomized controlled trial should have two groups. A group that receives the vaccine, that's the treatment group. And a completely unvaccinated group. Given a saline placebo, that's the control group. That's not what the supporters of the status quo mean when they say randomized control trial. They compare two groups, but one group gets the new vaccine and another group gets a shot full of aluminum adjuvants. Or they compare a new shot to an older shot. But the one thing they never do is to compare a completely unvaccinated group with a vaccinated group because everyone knows that such a trial will show harms. So if you go through all seventeen oh four trials in the database that Doctor. Scott has put together, as Erin Siri has done, you'll find that the inert ingredients are not inert. The placebo is not saline, and the randomized controlled trial does not have a completely unvaccinated control group. And we know that my assertion here is correct because on page nine of his written statement, Doctor. Scott states that vaccinated versus unvaccinated studies are especially prone to bias. It's hard to imagine a more Orwellian statement. Up is down, left is right, dogs are cats. And according to Doctor. Scott, a proper vaccinated versus unvaccinated study is unethical. That's why we're in this mess. That's why we have an autism and chronic disease epidemic in this country.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

Reading original sources and defining terms is the difference between getting the wrong answer and getting the right answer. It's astonishing how important this is.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@jarombra Yes, it was indeed pretty cool.

uTobian
Posted - October 2, 2025 at 4:43 AM
Saved - October 4, 2025 at 3:54 AM

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

"Tell me how a vaccine with negative efficacy is saving lives." It's not a riddle, the data show that Covid shots caused more harms than benefits. https://t.co/JL0mebuw09

Video Transcript AI Summary
They watched every meeting of the advisory committees in 2021–2023 when COVID shots were authorized. "the CDC's own research showed that the protection from the vaccine, if any, was between months two and six. And by six months, it showed negative efficacy." They assert, "The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months" and question, "how a shot with negative efficacy is saving lives, and it has the worst side effect profile of any vaccine in human history." "So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and negative efficacy saving lives?" They claim, "What ended the COVID pandemic was the Omicron variant that was more transmissible but less lethal." They question, "the vaccine, how many people it helped? It could be a net negative." They cite trial data: "'twenty one people died in the in the vaccinated group and seventeen died in in the, placebo group.'"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna add to this debate. I watched every single meeting of the advisory committee on immunization practices and the vaccines and related biological products advisory committee in 2021, 2022, and 2023 when all these COVID shots were being authorized for use in this country. And after a while, the CDC's own research showed that the protection from the vaccine, if any, was between months two and six. And by six months, it showed negative efficacy. So I'm watching the hearings on my, you know, computer screen at home. I'm yelling at the screen. The COVID shots have negative efficacy after six months. Tell me how a shot with negative efficacy is saving lives, and it has the worst side effect profile of any vaccine in human history. So how exactly is a vaccine with the worst side effects and negative efficacy saving lives? That's a preposterous claim. What ended the COVID pandemic was the Omicron variant that was more transmissible but less lethal. The vaccine, how many people it helped? I I think it's an open debate. It could be a net negative. Well, maybe we can look at the clinical trial data in which twenty one people died in the in the vaccinated group and seventeen died in in the, placebo group.
uTobian
Posted - January 22, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 11:06 AM

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

The "V-safe" database (a Covid vaccine adverse event database) ran on @Oracle. Joel Kallman, the head of the Oracle team that set that up, was killed by a Covid vaccine. And now Larry Ellison is back with his bullsh*t trying to kill more people with mRNA shots.

@townhallcom - Townhall.com

Larry Ellison of Oracle: AI will design mRNA vaccines for every individual person against cancer — making them robotically in 48 hours. "This is the promise of AI." https://t.co/qSgVpodRLY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Once we sequence a cancer tumor's genes, we can create a personalized mRNA vaccine for that individual within 48 hours using AI and robotics. This approach enables early cancer detection and the rapid development of targeted vaccines tailored specifically to each person's cancer. This represents the potential of AI and the future of cancer treatment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once we gene sequence, once we gene sequence that cancer tumor, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer. And you can make that vaccine, the that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically again using AI in about 48 hours. So imagine early cancer detection, the development of a cancer vaccine for the for your particular cancer aimed at you, and have have that vaccine available in 48 hours. This is the promise of AI and the promise of the future.
uTobian
Posted - May 20, 2024 at 10:12 PM
Saved - May 21, 2024 at 11:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Fauci's alleged blocking of access to Bactrim during the AIDS crisis resulted in 30,534 deaths from treatable pneumonia. The author was banned from Twitter for sharing this information but was reinstated by Elon Musk and now has 60k followers.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P.

During the AIDS crisis Dr. Fauci blocked access to the antibiotic Bactrim to create the market for AZT; 30,534 people then died from a treatable form of pneumonia. In 2021, I received a lifetime ban from Twitter for stating this fact. @elonmusk reinstated me. 60k followers now.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P.

@elonmusk For those who want to read the backstory on how Fauci blocked Bactrim: https://www.poz.com/blog/the-long-road-to-pcp

The long road to PCP prophylaxis in AIDS. An early history. I promised to write about some of my experiences in NYC at the very start of the epidemic, from both professional and personal perspectives poz.com
uTobian
Posted - December 27, 2023 at 8:17 AM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 2:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pharma's manipulation of the healthcare system is concerning. By convincing individuals to get annual Covid shots, they have the potential to drain their entire net worth. The revenue generated from each shot is minimal, but the subsequent development of autoimmune disorders and chronic conditions leads to extensive medical expenses. Insurance and government coverage diminish over time, forcing families to deplete their savings and sell assets to cover treatments that often prove ineffective. This widespread exploitation extends to millions of Americans and billions worldwide, making it a significant ongoing crime with the aim of stealing the wealth of the entire industrialized world.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P.

The Pharma Industrial Complex works like this: picture a 60-year-old woman. She has one million dollars in a 401(k) and another million dollars in equity in her house that she shares with her husband. If Pharma can convince this woman to get a Covid shot every year it has a chance to steal her entire net worth. The shot itself only generates about $100 in revenue for Pharma. But soon thereafter she develops an autoimmune disorder, myocarditis, or has a stroke. She's in and out of the hospital and sees an endless string of specialists who order hundreds of useless tests and prescribe a growing quantity of high-priced medicines. She slowly gets worse and now additional chronic conditions develop (diabetes, cancer, and/or dementia). At first her insurance covers some of the costs. Then the government picks up some costs. But as her health continues to deteriorate the family spends down their savings. They cash our her 401(k) and then her husband's as well. Eventually the husband sells the house to pay for more treatments that don't work. After a decade of illness she dies and the family says, "she received the best care." But now they are in debt with no assets. If some evil-doer had forced this family to work in a salt mine they could not have extracted nearly as much wealth as Pharma does by encouraging this woman to get the junk science Covid shots every year (along with junk science flu, RSV, pneumonia, and shingles shots). Now multiply this crime times the 200 million Americans who got the Covid shots and the 5.5 billion people around the world who have gotten Covid shots and you start to realize the enormity of what we are up against. This is the largest crime in human history, it is ongoing, and Pharma's goal is literally to steal the stored wealth of the entire industrialized world.

uTobian
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 6:57 PM
Saved - September 21, 2023 at 7:56 PM

@uTobian - Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P.

Pandemic theater — masks, plexiglass, social distancing, bans on singing — was predicated on SARS-CoV-2 being transmitted through droplets. But public health officials knew from the beginning that it was airborne. So pandemic theater was all just marketing for the vaccine.

View Full Interactive Feed