Former CDC Director Robert Redfield testified before the House Select COVID19 Committee, discussing the funding of gain-of-function research by the NIH. The posts suggest that this exposes the alleged lies of Dr. Fauci. The tone is conspiratorial and references various hashtags related to COVID19, gain-of-function research, and media personalities like Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson.
𝕏 Post Text
@InfoWars_tv - INFOWARS FAN
🚨 Former CDC Director Robert Redfield
EXPOSES the LIES of Dr. Fauci
during TESTIMONY before the
House Select COVID19 Committee. .
( NIH Funded Gain of Function )
🚨 INFOWARS WAS RIGHT 🚨
🕶️ TheY LiVe - We SLEEP 🕶️
#alexwaright #CovidWars #thegreatreset #mRNA #GainOfFauci #FauciFiles #FauciLied #infowars #owenwasright #warroom #BannonsWarRoom #alexjoneswasright #alexjones #TuckerCarlson
@MediaRival #lableak #GainOfFunctionResearch
#DoNotComply #DoNotComplyEVER #COVID19 #thegreatreset #lockdowns #covid23
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss whether the NIH funded gain of function research and its potential role in the pandemic. There is a heated exchange between a senator and a speaker who denies responsibility for any deaths. The possibility of Dr. Fauci lying under oath is raised, and it is suggested that American tax dollars funded the research. The Luban Institute is mentioned as conducting gain of function research. Dr. Redfield expresses concern that the virus may have been engineered. Gain of function research is defined as increasing a pathogen's transmissibility or pathogenicity. It is concluded that gain of function research did not stop the pandemic, but rather caused it.
Speaker 0: Knowing that it
Speaker 1: is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research
Speaker 2: You are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individual. I totally resent that. And if anybody is lying here, senator, it is you.
Speaker 3: Do you think that doctor Fauci intentionally lied under oath to senator Paul when he vehemently denied NIH's funding of gain of function research.
Speaker 0: I think there's no doubt that NIH was funding gain of function research.
Speaker 3: Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain of function research that created this virus.
Speaker 0: I think it did not not only from NIH, but from the state department, USAID, and from
Speaker 4: So in your expert opinion, was the Luban Institute conducting gain of function research? Absolutely.
Speaker 5: Doctor Redfield, did you 3, in your opinion with doctor Anderson's assessment at the time that this virus did look engineered?
Speaker 0: It was very disconcerting me, it looked like this virus was engineered.
Speaker 4: In one sentence, can you provide a definition of gain of function research?
Speaker 0: I think it's to take a pathogen and try to Increase one of 2 things or both. To increase its transmissibility or its pathogenicity.
Speaker 4: Has gained a function and stopped the pandemic In your opinion
Speaker 0: No. On the contrary, I think it probably caused the greatest pandemic our world has seen.
