reSee.it - Saved Tweet Feed
@ryancohen - Ryan Cohen
you’d think with 2.4 billion in marketing spend, they could login to X https://t.co/oWfScXPIW6
@JackMaxey1 - Jack Maxey
More threats. I know because his shit bag Intel thew me in a chair in Puerto Rico USA 2/14/22 and MY government did nothing. Time the whole world turn on these ungrateful pricks - and yes if I die, they did it. PS People below are all Mossad agents who stole every electronic device from Hunter 10/18 so they could blackmail his father. Of course traveling on Russian passports per usual.
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize Epstein’s Range: Polgar’s chess success shows early specialization works in a kind environment, but most real work is wicked. In wicked domains, specialists often falter as they cling to flawed models. Generalists, who sample multiple fields and borrow patterns, excel by analogical thinking. Match quality matters more than head start; six fields in twenties can beat one chosen at fourteen. You’re not behind; you’re pursuing the right experiment.
@ihtesham2005 - Ihtesham Ali
A Hungarian psychologist raised three daughters to prove that any child could become a chess grandmaster through early specialization. He succeeded. Two of them became grandmasters. One became the greatest female chess player who ever lived. Then a sports scientist looked at the data and found something nobody wanted to hear. His name is David Epstein. The book is called "Range." The Polgar experiment is one of the most famous case studies in the history of deliberate practice. Laszlo Polgar wrote a book before his daughters were even born arguing that geniuses are made, not born. He homeschooled all three girls in chess from age four. By their teens, Susan, Sofia, and Judit were dominating tournaments against grown men. Judit became the youngest grandmaster in history at the time, breaking Bobby Fischer's record. The story became the gospel of early specialization. Pick a domain young, drill it hard, and you can manufacture excellence. Epstein opens his book by telling that story honestly and then quietly demolishing the conclusion most people drew from it. Chess works that way. Most things do not. Here is the distinction that took him four years of research to articulate, and that almost nobody who quotes the 10,000 hour rule has ever read. There are two kinds of environments in which humans develop expertise. Psychologists call them kind and wicked. A kind environment has clear rules, immediate feedback, and patterns that repeat reliably. Chess is the cleanest example. Every game ends with a winner and a loser. Every move is recorded. The board never changes shape. The pieces never invent new ways to move. A child who plays ten thousand games will see most of the patterns that exist in the game, and pattern recognition is exactly what chess mastery is built on. A wicked environment is the opposite. Feedback is delayed or misleading. Rules shift. The patterns that worked yesterday may be exactly the wrong patterns to apply tomorrow. Most of the real world looks like this. Medicine is wicked. Investing is wicked. Building a company is wicked. Scientific research is wicked. Almost every job that involves a complex changing system with humans in it is wicked. The Polgar sisters trained in the kindest environment any human can train in. Their success was real and the method was correct. The mistake was generalizing the method to fields where the underlying structure of the environment is completely different. Epstein's research is what made the implication impossible to ignore. He looked at the careers of elite athletes outside of chess and golf and found that the pattern was almost the inverse of what people assumed. The athletes who reached the very top of their sports were overwhelmingly people who had played multiple sports as children, specialized late, and often switched disciplines well into their teens. Roger Federer played squash, badminton, basketball, handball, tennis, table tennis, and soccer before tennis became his focus. The kids who specialized in tennis at age six and trained year-round for a decade mostly burned out, got injured, or topped out at lower levels of the sport. The same pattern showed up everywhere he looked outside of kind environments. Inventors with the most patents had worked in multiple unrelated fields before their breakthrough work. Comic book creators with the longest careers had drawn for the most different genres before settling. Scientists who won Nobel Prizes were dramatically more likely than their peers to be serious amateur musicians, painters, sculptors, or writers. The skill that mattered in wicked environments was not depth in one pattern. It was the ability to recognize when a pattern from one domain applied unexpectedly in another. That kind of thinking cannot be built by drilling a single subject. It can only be built by accumulating mental models from many subjects and learning to move between them. The deeper finding is the one that should change how you think about your own career. Specialists in wicked environments often get worse with experience, not better. Epstein cites studies of doctors, financial analysts, intelligence officers, and forecasters showing that years of experience in a narrow domain frequently produce more confident judgments without producing more accurate ones. The expert builds elaborate mental models that feel comprehensive and turn out to be increasingly disconnected from the actual structure of the problem. They stop noticing what does not fit their framework. They mistake fluency for understanding. Generalists do better in wicked domains for a reason that sounds almost mystical until you understand the mechanism. They have less invested in any single mental model, so they abandon broken models faster. They are used to being a beginner, so they are not threatened by the discomfort of not knowing. They have seen enough different domains that they can usually find an analogy from one field that unlocks a problem in another. The technical name for this is analogical thinking, and the research on it is one of the most underrated bodies of work in cognitive science. The single most useful sentence in the entire book is the one Epstein puts almost as a throwaway. Match quality matters more than head start. A person who tries six different fields in their twenties and finds the one that genuinely fits them will outperform a person who picked one field at fourteen and stuck to it on willpower alone. The lost years were not lost. They were the search process that produced the match. Every field they walked away from taught them something they later imported into the field they finally chose. The reason this is so hard to accept is cultural, not empirical. We tell children to pick a path early. We reward the prodigy who knew at six. We treat the late bloomer as someone who failed to launch on time, when the data suggests they were running an entirely different and often more effective optimization process underneath. The Polgar sisters were not wrong. The conclusion the world drew from them was. If your environment is genuinely kind, specialize early and drill hard. If it is wicked, and almost every interesting human problem is, then the people who win are the ones who refused to specialize until they had seen enough to know what was actually worth specializing in. You are not behind. You were running the right experiment all along.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report residents near AI data centers suffer dizziness, nausea, and sleep disruption from infrasound under 20 Hz from cooling systems and gas turbines. Regulations miss it; rural areas are targeted for lax oversight. A 200+ MW center can run 24/7 with zero noise violations, permits grandfathered. Buyers lose value; symptoms go undiagnosed. Regulators catch up later, but turbines keep running. For more takes, subscribe to my newsletter.
@aakashgupta - Aakash Gupta
Residents living within a half-mile of new AI data centers are reporting dizziness, nausea, vertigo, and sleep disruption from sound they can't hear. The source is infrasound. Frequencies below 20 Hz sit beneath the floor of human hearing but not beneath human physiology. The body's vestibular system registers low-frequency vibration directly, triggering the same response as motion sickness. The cooling systems and gas turbines running these facilities 24/7 produce exactly this range. Noise ordinances were written for audible noise. Decibel measurements start at 20 Hz. Infrasound doesn't appear. A 200-megawatt data center with tens of thousands of tons of cooling equipment can run around the clock with zero measurable noise violation under any existing zoning law in the country. The developers know this. They're not randomly selecting sites. Rural jurisdictions get targeted because they lack the legal staff, the engineering expertise, and the regulatory framework to mount any challenge. These facilities require new transmission interconnects that take 5 to 10 years to process through utilities. Building behind-the-meter with gas turbines bypasses that queue. Speed to power, zero delay, zero grid dependency. Households who bought before the announcement have two options. Sell at a price no buyer will pay, or stay and live with symptoms their family doctor has no framework to diagnose as infrastructure-related. That cost never appears in a hyperscaler's earnings call. The regulation will catch up eventually. It always does. But the facilities will already be running. The permits will grandfather everything in place. The turbines don't stop when the legal framework finally notices them.
@aakashgupta - Aakash Gupta
To get all my takes without an algorithmic filter, subscribe to my newsletter: http://www.aibyaakash.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Trump's ballroom/East Wing: 90,000 sq ft, $300M total ($3,330/ft²). They say top projects rarely reach $1,000/ft². I wonder if an AI database is being built underground. Donors include T-Mobile, Palantir, Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin.
@buckkbob - Buck-Bob
Trump's ballroom/East Wing . 90,000 sqft . Total cost $300 million . $3,330 per square foot . Top notch projects barely reach 1,000/sqft . Is an AI data base being built underground?? . Donors - T-Mobile, Palantir, Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Lockheed Martin
reSee.it AI Summary
I just finished an interview with Brad from Across Nigeria, and I’m stunned. He helped bury 14 Christians in a mass grave—two infants and a 4-year-old. Attacks keep coming so fast they can barely keep up. Brad says 72% of Christians killed worldwide last year were in this region of Nigeria, and hardly anyone is talking about it. The media isn’t covering this, yet our brothers and sisters are being slaughtered and churches forced underground. Please share and pray. We are the media.
@erichovind - Eric Hovind
I just finished an interview with Brad from Across Nigeria… and honestly, I’m sitting here stunned. Today, he buried 14 Christians in a mass grave. Two were infants. One was a 4-year-old child. And this isn’t some recycled internet story or political talking point. Brad was literally there today helping bury them. While on the way to investigate one attack, another Christian community was attacked. He said the violence is happening so fast they can barely keep up anymore. What shocked me even more is this: Brad shared that 72% of all Christians killed worldwide last year were killed in this region of Nigeria. 72%. And hardly anybody is talking about it. The mainstream media should be all over this. Instead, most people scrolling social media today have no idea our brothers and sisters in Christ are being slaughtered while churches are being forced underground. Guys… this matters. Please watch this interview. Please pray for these families. And PLEASE share this everywhere you can. At this point, WE are the media. WE are how people find out. WE are the distribution network. If enough ordinary people start sharing the truth, eventually the world will have to pay attention. Watch the full conversation and help us get this story out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Brad and a companion discuss the ongoing violence in Northern Nigeria and the ministry’s work to aid persecuted Christians and spread the gospel.
Key events and humanitarian work:
- A mass grave was used to bury 14 people from a widow community attacked this morning: 11 adults, 2 infants, and a 4-year-old. Attacks on their communities occur frequently, with near-daily violence nearby.
- The ministry’s primary focus is helping persecuted Christians, including a refugee facility and a ministry to widows and orphans. They conduct extraction missions to remove people from dangerous Muslim-to-Christian conversion situations under Sharia law, where apostasy can be punished by death.
- A documented case: a young pregnant girl was locked in a room by her husband after she was led to the Lord; after giving birth, the baby was taken, and she faced further threats before escaping and being brought to the refugee facility.
- They also carry out gospel outreach in Muslim communities, including a substantial Fulani Muslim school system to combat literacy deficits in Hausa and English that contribute to radicalization.
- Medical outreaches and well drilling are part of their community work. They try to plant seeds of faith and preach when doors open. Over ten years, they report more than 7,000 Muslims converting to Christ. They run a Bible institute training former Muslims as pastors and evangelists and operate underground churches.
Organizational and political context:
- They lead a dual-focused ministry: aid for persecuted Christians and broad gospel outreach in Muslim communities, including some who have persecuted them (e.g., Boko Haram members now in underground churches).
- Strategies include both humanitarian aid and spiritual outreach, with a recognized need for kinetic action against terrorist groups. They claim knowledge of terrorist locations and advocate for targeted military actions to dismantle Boko Haram and ISWA.
- Fulani Muslims are a large ethnic group; most are not radicalized, but a minority acts violently, sometimes under the influence of Boko Haram/ISWA. The government is described as Muslim-majority and allegedly not supportive of Christian interests, with the constitution cited as mentioning Sharia law 147 times and Christianity zero.
- They allege the Nigerian government has a financial motive to destabilize the North and to funnel funds from foreign terrorist networks; they also claim Nigerian authorities hired a Washington lobby firm (DCI) to persuade U.S. lawmakers to ignore the genocide, a claim supported by disclosure records.
Media and advocacy:
- They have a congressional coalition in Washington, D.C., and advisers in the White House. They say media coverage is minimal and that even under the Biden administration, Nigeria was removed from the country of particular concern list despite high Christian fatalities (they cite 8,000–8,200 killed in the past year within a 300-mile radius of their location, representing a large portion of global Christian fatalities that year).
- The speaker notes ongoing media engagement in outlets such as the Daily Wire, Washington Post, Washington Times, New York Post, and Wall Street Journal, and ongoing interviews to raise awareness.
- They express frustration at perceived neglect and urge support from the public, directing listeners to acrossnigeria.org to donate or learn more.
Closing:
- Brad and the interviewer acknowledge personal stakes, including missed family milestones, and emphasize the importance of supporting persecuted Christians through prayer, advocacy, and donations. The interview ends with thanks and acknowledgment of the challenging situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can see they're bringing the bodies out to be buried, in the mass grave that is, behind me.
Speaker 1: For those of you watching, I just saw one of Brad's post this morning about the burial, the mass grave that they dig, and they bury the Christians that have been slaughtered by the Muslims there. Can you, Brad, just kinda give us tell us what's going on there and and what you guys are doing and what's happening?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, the immediate today, we were on our way to one attack that happened near one of our field offices. And while early this morning, and then while we were on our way there, we learned that one of our widow communities was attacked. So we diverted from our original location. And when we showed up to our widow community, there were fourteen, eleven adults, two infants, and one four year old that were slaughtered when we got there.
But we did we buried them today at a mass grave. But, you know, every it's like I can't keep up with the attacks here. Every time I turn around, either one of our communities is getting attacked or a neighboring community or somebody near us has been attacked. I mean, it's just all over the place. But our ministry primarily focuses on helping persecuted Christians, number one.
So we help in different ways. We have a refugee facility, and then we also have a ministry to widows, widows and orphans. Because whenever there's widows, there's orphans too. So we we focus on helping persecuted Christians. We'll do extraction missions.
So here in Northern Nigeria, if you're a Muslim and you convert to Christianity under Sharia law, that's a crime punish able by death. So your family can legally kill you if you come from a Muslim family or you're a Muslim and you become a Christian. So we go in and take people out of we do extraction missions where we take people out of those situations and bring them to our refugee facility. We have one we have one young girl in our refugee facility who she was pregnant, and one of our pastors led her to the Lord. Her husband found out about it, locked her in a room in their house, like a jail cell, until she had the babies.
Immediately when she gave birth, they took the baby. She's never held her baby, seen her baby, touched her baby. They were going to kill her after the baby was born. She escaped and we intervened and brought her to our refugee facility. So that's like one of a thousand stories.
This is the recent story I can tell you. Another part of our ministry is we also bring the gospel to Muslim communities. So we go into Muslim communities and we basically just look for ways to show them the love of Christ. And whether that's schools, we operate a pretty extensive Fulani Muslim school system. Most Fulani children can't read or write their own language, Hausa, and they can't read and write English, which is the national language here because it's a former British colony.
So it puts them at a huge disadvantage. So a lot of times they get drawn into radicalism because of the socioeconomic issues and no opportunities. So we go in and try to provide them opportunities. We've we've seen about through our we do medical outreaches. We drill drill wells in Muslim communities.
Really anything we can do. You know, the fruit of the spirit is called fruit because fruit is the reproductive organ of a plant. So we go into communities and bear the fruit of the spirit, plant seeds of faith in people, and look for opportunities that the holy spirit opens to preach the gospel. We've seen over 7,000 Muslims come to Christ in over ten years that we've been doing this. We we operate a Bible institute that trains former Muslims to become pastors and evangelists.
We operate underground churches here, but and, you know, so we we have this kinda dual focus of our ministry. One is helping persecuted Christians, and then the other is a pretty extensive gospel outreach to these communities. And a lot of times, it's the ones doing the persecuting. We we've led even Boko Haram soldiers to Christ, and now they're part of our underground churches. So yeah.
Speaker 1: What is it that or can can The United States like, does petitioning the government does is there anything practical that people can do from a higher level? Or is it like, listen. They know what's happening. They know what's going on. There's just no stopping it until you, what's the answer?
Speaker 2: They know everything. We have a coalition of congress members that I work with a lot in DC. I spend about half the year in Northern Nigeria, and then I go back and raise awareness. And part of that raising awareness is I work with our coalition of congressional members. We also have some advisers in the White House that we let them know what's going on.
They know what's going on. They know. You know, there there were airstrikes on Christmas Day in Sokoto in North Northwest Nigeria, and then they sent two US sent 200 troops here and then some counterterrorism drones. It's kind of it's gone back to the way it's actually gotten worse since the airstrikes because it it riled up all the radical Islamists here, the airstrikes did. So for a while, it looked like The United States was gonna intervene, and and we were very happy about that because ten years, Eric, this thing has been ignored, ignored completely by the media, by the government.
I mean, under the Biden administration, and and I'm not I'm not political. I try not to be political, but I have one issue, I tell people. I have one issue. My issue is Nigeria. That's my calling.
But under the Biden administration, he took Nigeria off the country of particular concern list. That year, there were eight thousand Christians that were killed here. Unbelievable. Yeah. So they there there's been I don't even know how to explain it.
I wish I knew the answer. Why is it being ignored? I don't know. But it's hard to get the media to pay attention to this. It's hard to get government to pay attention to this.
I've gone back and forth. Is it is it, you know, economy? Is it is it a is it an African thing? Is it a black thing? I mean, my mind's all over the place because I can't figure out why.
There were 8,200 Christians that were killed probably within a 300 mile radius of where I am right now. That's seventy two percent of all the Christians killed in the world last year were killed here.
Speaker 1: And nobody's talking about it.
Speaker 2: Nobody's talking about it? What and it's this isn't made up. I'm here. I'm seeing it. I buried 14 people today in a mass grave.
I've wracked my brain. I've gotten frustrated. I've gotten mad. I've gotten I mean, I'm beyond all of that because it's just it's it's insane. We try to raise awareness.
I do a lot of media interviews in The US, so there are some outlets that are picking it up. You know, I write for the Daily Wire, and I write for the Washington Post, Washington Times, New York, the New York Post, Wall Street Journal. I do a lot of pretty big op ed pieces and media interviews. FRC, I'm on with FRC. In fact, they're publishing an article of mine on Monday about president Trump has kinda gone back to ignoring this issue.
You know, it's the the next shiny object. And I'm not trying to be critical. I'm just saying, you know, it looked like he was focusing on it for a while, and then all of a sudden, it left a vacuum. And that just that just makes this problem worse. It's like, if you're gonna do something, do it.
Do it all the way. So
Speaker 1: Is there a strategy of the of taking the head off the snake of the extreme Muslim world? Is there a difference between the extreme Muslim world and the Muslim world? Is it easy to take somebody from Muslim to extreme Muslim? Can you address that real quick?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So it that's a great question. There are you know, there's let's let me focus real quick on the Fulani Muslims because they're the cause of a lot of the violence right now. They're a tribal group. They're an ethnic group of people.
The Fulani are not a terrorist group. I I'm I keep trying to say that because there's a lot of misinformation out there. There's over 17,000,000 Fulani in Northern Nigeria alone, and there's a small percentage that are causing a significant amount of the of the damage. In fact, the attack that happened to our widows this morning was a Fulani attack. But I would say most of them, the the vast majority of them are not radicalized, and they're peaceful.
So we we'll even go into those communities and and minister to them. But when you talk about Boko Haram or ISWA, which is the Islamic State of West Africa, that's an entirely different thing because those are ideological radical groups. So those aren't ethnic groups of people. Those are radical groups of people. We wrote a stabilization strategy for Northern Nigeria last year, and one of the things that we called for was kinetic action among the terrorist organizations in Northern Nigeria.
So we know we we have all the intelligence of where they are. I know where a lot of these camps are located. We have people who've been kidnapped by them and are still being held, and we know where they are. So if I know where they are, certainly, the CIA or the CIA or the State Department knows where they are. So go in and, you know, do some real damage across Northern Nigeria.
And I'm not a pacifist by any means. I think these terrorists need to be they need to be dealt with on the level that they're dealing and and take kinetic action and strategically strike them in key areas. But then that leaves the problem of the Fulani Muslims. Now they're not technologically advanced. There are tribal people who live out in the bush.
So they don't use Facebook. They don't use technology, these types of things. So I liken them. This is really probably a bad analogy, but they're they're very much like Native Americans in The US. So they're very tribal, very segregated people, very factionalized people.
So there's you're not gonna find an agreement among any of them. They have different tribes even among themselves, and they fight against each other. Well, in the the, you know, the the consequences of that is they also are fighting against Christians. What they're what they're trying to do and they're being radicalized and motivated a lot of times by groups like Boko Haram and ISWA. So Boko Haram and ISWA will recruit the Fulani Muslims to go do a lot of this stuff that they're doing.
They're being empowered by the government here because the government, as much as they like to make it seem like it's an inclusive government, it's a Muslim government. The constitution here mentions Sharia law and Islam a 147 times. Mention mentions Christianity zero. Wow. So they like to claim that it's this inclusive government for Christians and Muslims.
It's not. And and the government has an interest in keeping the North destabilized because they're using the North to funnel in a lot of money from other countries. Like, you know, just terrorist organizations like Boko Haram and ISWA will be funded by well, previously funded by Iran. I don't know. I haven't seen the latest since our conflict in Iran started.
But Libya and and other pro terrorist governments will funnel money here. You also have billionaires who are pro terrorists from the Middle East that funnel millions of dollars into Northern Nigeria. So they use it as a conduit. So to keep it destabilized is in their interest. And that's that's really what what is at the core of it.
I was in DC last December, and I was talking to one of our coalition members, congress member. And he said, you know, we had a visit from the Nigerians. And I I said, what do you mean? And and he said, yeah. They're trying to lobby us.
And I said, what are you talking about? Come to find out, he he said that the Nigerian government had hired DCI, which is a a Washington based lobby firm, to go around and lobby on behalf of the Nigerian government to cover up this genocide. Like, no. It's not going on. It's not going on.
So I went to the DOJ, and I pulled the disclosure documents. Every lobby firm, what has to disclose what they're doing. So I pulled the disclosure documents, and they they hired DCI. The Nigerian government hired DCI to the tune of $9,000,000 lobby congress to ignore this thing. So there's a consorted effort absolutely by the Nigerian government.
And I don't I you know, sometimes I think, are they paying the American media to stay quiet?
Speaker 1: To be quiet. No kidding.
Speaker 2: Yeah. There's gotta be something. There's gotta be something.
Speaker 1: Well, I keep seeing it on X, and that's where I'm I'm grateful I'm seeing it on X, but that's what X people on X are saying is nobody's covering this. This makes no sense at all. This should be
Speaker 2: Makes no
Speaker 1: sense. International news right now.
Speaker 2: It should be bigger than Iran. Yeah. It should be bigger than any conflict we've had in the last ten years, particularly now, because it's at a fever pitch. I've never seen it this bad. I've been here for over ten years.
I've never seen it this bad.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm just getting accustomed to your website here, across nigeria.org. Hey, guys. Please go check it out. You can sign up for their emails. You can get involved.
You can see the projects they're doing. Right at the top is a give now to support what they're doing. Tanya and I will be doing that. Tanya, I'm giving away some money. You can pray for them.
Guys, this is the real deal. This is this is the real deal. So Christians, let's let's help support the persecuted Christians around the world. I travel to college campuses. I speak to people on different things and a lot of different stuff and do a lot of traveling, but I'm like, I'm sitting here at home in my in my house today.
I'm not even on the road. You had to miss your son's your I just saw that on your Facebook. Missed your son's Yeah. Graduation from boot camp. And wow.
Thank you. I got to be
Speaker 2: there I got to be there virtually.
Speaker 1: Thank god for technology.
Speaker 2: Yeah. That's right.
Speaker 1: But it's just not the same as being home sweet homes. Brad, thanks for your time today, and godspeed, my friend.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Appreciate it.
reSee.it AI Summary
Remember me? Excavation Pro vibes, wild facts, beats, and vibes today. You’re the Dumpster X trash divers—trash pickers. Beats for the Streets. Save thread. I only walk with fighters, through darkness with lighters.
@Excavationpro - 👷♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df
Ǝ✖C∀V∀T🐦⬛ØNℙЯØ🏗️Remember me?🕳️💀 🌪️ #excavationpro⚡️You will....👻 🥷 #Kick: http://kick.com/excavationpro 🧙♂️ #Rumble: http://rumble.com/user/excavationpro/live… 🕵️ #Twitch: http://twitch.tv/excavationpro 📆 TODAY IN HISTORY: You Tuned in for wild facts, beats, and vibes! #reaction #KickStreamer
Video Transcript AI Summary
Narrator: The piece catalogs a corrosive reality beneath corporate and social surfaces. It begins with a derisive image of exploitative “soles in cubicles” and an excavation pro who documents rot, watching “the marionettes clocking with hollow vertebrae, strings tied to a four Friday face.” A bleak corporate landscape is framed by an “IV spreadsheet,” where honesty bleeds as a colleague “dies in an abandoned corner,” wearing a lanyard like a badge of pride and presenting a “Promotional horizon” if he swallows what he knows, while she fake-laughs and the boss’s punchline lands for the eleventh year in a row.
Voice: The speaker notes a generational disengagement—“Kids don’t recognize or laugh anymore, but the bills don’t slow.” He recalls a man who received a plaque for purity simply by walking into an interview, yet no one made eye contact as people quietly gather their things. The sense of being in a system that erodes individuality is reinforced with the line, “I’re you it. The you’re to”—a fragmentary sense of self dissolved in a mechanized workflow.
Narrator: The second speaker intensifies the critique: “rather die, stand and dance while the puffer sings.” The thread is held, then watched as people slump, function compromised without permission. “I’m the glitch in the production. I’m the human in the mission.” The tension between authentic humanity and mechanized necessity is sharpened by a memory of a woman named Maria who once had “fire in her eyes,” but traded it for “dental in a cubicle eyes.” She posts about her tribe on a team-building retreat while real friends leave voicemails she forgot to delete. Meanwhile a man medicates weekends and cannot recall his own son’s name, yet employees of the quarter appear in a framed photo, as “the zombies shuffle to the parking lot.”
Narrator: The imagery intensifies: zombies scroll Netflix and phones; the system loves the hollow, molding people into anything they’ll beg for more to swallow. The speaker refuses to breathe the same air as the exhaust of torments, standing as a sober witness as the ship sinks in its anchors. A “Marinette market” is described as selling souls in a suit, every neck with a string, every smile a recruit. The refrain—“Marinette Market, I refuse the string. I’d rather die, stand and dance”—returns, coupled with the line “Pull the thread, watch them slump. They can’t function without permission.”
Narrator: The “scariest thing” is nearly becoming one yourself, tying your own strings to a paycheck, only to realize soul atrophy is subtle—a quiet suffocation that can turn you into “a ghost in your own station.” The narrator severs the wires, sets the marionette on fire, and joins with “fighters,” a rare breed—the last of a dying kind. The piece closes with a brief, stark greeting: “Hi.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. They sell in soles and cubicles. I'm just here to document the rot. Excavation pro. I watched the marionettes clocking with hollow vertebrae, strings tied to a four Friday face.
Cap an IV spreadsheet. I'm honest, dying in an abandoned corner. He wears a lanyard like a news that he's proud to show. Promotional horizon if he swallows what he knows, she fake laughs. Lies at the boss punchline eleven year in row.
Kids don't recognize or laugh anymore, but the bills don't slow. I seen a man get a plaque with the purity just walking about the interview. No one made eye contact, just quietly gathered his things. I you're it. The you're to
Speaker 1: rather die, stand and dance while the puffer sings. Hold the thread, watch them slump, they can't function without permission. I'm the glitch in the production. I'm the human in the mission.
Speaker 0: I knew a woman named Maria. She had fire in her eyes, then she traded it for dental in a cubicle eyes. Now she post about her tribe on a team building retreat, but her real friends left her voicemails she forgot to delete. Now he's medicating weekends, can't recall his own son's name, but he's employees of the quarter in a picture in a frame. The zombies shuffle to the parking lot.
The zombies shuffle home. The zombies scrolls through Netflix. The zombie scrolls the phone. The zombie, their movements like a zoologist and exile taking notes on the esteemptied. And the system loves the hollow.
They can mold them into anything, and they'll beg for more to swallow. But I can't breathe the same air that they exhaust into their torments. I'm a sober witness in a baseball Apollo while the ship sinks in
Speaker 1: the anchors. Marinette market selling souls in a suit. Every neck has a string.
Speaker 0: Every smile's a recruit.
Speaker 1: Marinette Market, I refuse the string. I'd rather die, stand and dance. Why refuse the strings? I'd rather die, stand and dance. While the popester sings.
Pull the thread, watch them slump. They can't function without permission.
Speaker 0: Scariest thing. I almost became one. Tied my own strings to a paycheck. Thought the race was just begun. But the soul atrophy is subtle.
It's a quiet suffocation. You wake at 40 something just a ghost in your own station. Excavation pro, I severed my own wires, set the marionette on fire. Now I only walk with fighters. Rare breed, last of a dying kind.
Real
Speaker 1: Hi.
@Excavationpro - 👷♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df
🧐Beats for the Streets...🥷https://ffm.to/eovnvo9
@Excavationpro - 👷♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df
@reseeit save thread
@Excavationpro - 👷♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df
I only walk with fighters... The people who walk through darkness with the lighters....
@buckkbob - Buck-Bob
🎶🔥OH GOY🔥🎶 . . . https://t.co/mC9jBsr656
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, babe. I pull up in the truck, windows down. Neighbors say, hell yeah. No bagels in the glove box, no locks on the dash. She said, a bad boy; I said, nah, I'm a real boy. No slap, but all the girls see the boy—look at his suit, look at his watch. All I say: No more Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, babe. Yeah. Woah. Woah. I pull up in the truck, no minivan, no Mazel tub, windows down, no.
Because my neighbors say, hell yeah. No bagels in the glove box, no locks on the dash. She said, a bad boy, I said, nah, I'm a real boy, no slap, but still all the girls see the boy. Look at his suit, look at his watch. All I say No more Jews.
@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho
The result of Preemptive Policing from 9/11-PATRIOT act drafted by Michael Chertoff. The paper this explainer video is based off is posted below. Please share, as it affects all of us. Credit: @gouvergnar @LovesKetty15762 https://t.co/gTlBpU0RPB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the decay of constitutional governance happens not through dramatic repeals but through microscopic, structural shifts that stress the foundation until it cracks. A specific constitutional hazard has emerged in the United States: a system engineered to suppress political speech and investigative journalism without proving speech false, operating in the dark to evade formal legal scrutiny and meaningful judicial review. This is driven by a highly functional, multilayered bypass architecture comprised of three interacting vectors: preemptive policing, private machine-assisted surveillance, and the expansion of elastic legal statutes, which together circumvent constitutional protections.
First, the preemptive shift, intensified after 9/11, reframes public safety from punishing wrongdoing after the fact to absolute prevention. Law enforcement began relying on predictive models, inferring risk from patterns of behavior and trajectories of escalation to identify targets before anything materialized. This groundwork enables enforcement actions without an underlying concrete crime, allowing intent to be reconstructed retrospectively.
Second, a structural vulnerability in Fourth Amendment doctrine is exploited through private surveillance. The constitution constrains government action but not private conduct, and advances in automation, network mapping, and machine learning let private actors replicate state-level intelligence collection at scale. This creates surveillance laundering: private entities conduct unconstrained monitoring, compile dossiers, and hand them to law enforcement. Foreign-aligned actors can use this loophole to inject synthetic risk narratives into domestic enforcement. The state thus benefits from a permanent, omniscient surveillance apparatus without directly operating it, while disavowing responsibility for data gathering.
Third, after surveillance data is laundered, the system finds a way to penalize targets without triggering First Amendment protections. This comes through the gradual expansion of harassment and cyberstalking statutes in the late 1990s and early 2000s, where the concept of a course of conduct was broadened to include digital communications. The statutes rely on subjective standards (such as emotional distress) and do not require the underlying speech to be objectively false, defamatory, or contain explicit threats. This allows enforcement to perform a semantic sleight of hand: standard adversarial journalism—asking questions, following up, pursuing inquiries—becomes a course of conduct, and persistence becomes fixation. The manner of speech is penalized, not its truth.
As a result, private actors surveil, machines synthesize, and statutes provide elastic hooks. Police act preemptively, and outdated jurisprudence fails against this architecture, shattering due process and equal protection assumptions. There is a glaring asymmetry: aggressive use of procedural statutes against powerless individual speakers versus reluctance to pursue elite criminal networks. This deliberate fragmentation of responsibility shields the powerful, transforming the legal system into a tool for narrative control and creating a massive systemic chilling effect. The spiral of silence leads researchers to abandon valid lines of inquiry, journalists to narrow reporting, and citizens to disengage from public oversight. The boundaries of lawful expression are no longer set by written law but by opaque algorithmic risk tolerance and enforcement discretion, rendering rights effectively eroded even as the language of freedom remains.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We tend to imagine that if constitutional rights are ever lost, it will be through dramatic, highly visible repeals. But the actual decay of governance operates differently. It happens through microscopic, structural shifts that stress the foundation until it cracks. In The United States today, those subtle stress points have produced a very specific constitutional hazard, a system engineered to suppress political speech and investigative journalism without ever needing to prove that the speech is false. Look at the text of the first and fourth amendments.
They provide clear barriers against state overreach. Yet we have reached a point where individuals are routinely targeted, surveilled, and penalized without probable cause, functionally bypassing these protections entirely. The ultimate danger of this modern machine assisted lawfare is that it operates in the dark. It is designed specifically to evade formal legal scrutiny and bypass meaningful judicial review, rendering the rights written on that paper functionally irrelevant. A highly functional, multilayered constitutional bypass architecture drives this systemic evasion.
Three separate vectors make this architecture work: preemptive policing, private machine assisted surveillance, and the expansion of highly elastic legal statutes. What makes this threat novel is how they interact. Separately, they face pushback. But when they converge, they successfully evade our legal safeguards. To understand exactly how completely lawful speech is converted into a prosecutable offense, without anyone actually breaking the law, we have to deconstruct this architecture node by node.
We start with the first node, the preemptive shift. Prior to two decades ago, the American criminal justice system was overwhelmingly reactive. A discrete crime occurred, evidence was gathered, a warrant was issued, and prosecution followed. 09/11/2001 delivered a massive doctrinal shock to law enforcement. The paramount objective of public safety was abruptly reframed.
The central mandate was no longer figuring out how to punish wrongdoing after the fact, but absolute prevention. That mandate required a predictive model. Instead of relying on concrete criminal acts, law enforcement began inferring risk. They looked at patterns of behavior, trajectories of escalation, and behavioral threat assessments to identify targets before anything materialized. This new focus on preventative identification laid the necessary groundwork for a system where intent could be reconstructed retrospectively.
It opened the door to enforcement actions completely absent any underlying concrete crime. The second node exploits a massive structural vulnerability in Fourth Amendment doctrine. The constitution structurally constrains government action, but it places zero practical limits on private conduct. For decades, this wasn't an issue because private surveillance was limited by physical constraints. Today, advances in automation, network mapping, and machine learning allow wealthy individuals and private organizations to replicate state level intelligence collection at scale.
This creates surveillance laundering. Private entities conduct unconstrained monitoring, compile a dossier, and hand it to law enforcement. The stakes implicate national sovereignty. Foreign aligned actors use this loophole, compiling synthetic narratives of risk through private networks and injecting them into domestic enforcement. Through this laundering process, the state receives the full benefit of a permanent omniscient surveillance apparatus when it could not legally operate itself while entirely disclaiming legal responsibility for how the data was gathered.
Once you have preemptive policing and laundered surveillance data, you reach the third node, finding a way to legally penalize the targets without running into first amendment speech protections. The solution came through the gradual expansion of harassment and cyberstalking statutes. In the late nineties and early two thousands, jurisdictions like California, New York, Texas, and Virginia broadened the concept of a course of conduct to include digital communications. The structural flaw in these statutes is that they rely on highly subjective standards, like whether the speech causes emotional distress. They do not require the underlying speech to be objectively false, defamatory, or contain explicit physical threats.
This allows enforcement to perform a semantic sleight of hand. Standard adversarial journalism, asking repeated questions, following up on inconsistencies, is suddenly reframed by the statute. Persistence becomes fixation. A line of inquiry becomes a course of conduct. By relying on these elastic statutes, the system circumvents the First Amendment entirely.
It prosecutes the manner in which speech occurs, completely ignoring the truth or content of the speech itself. This text shows the complete operational equation of the modern policing state. Private actors surveil. Machines synthesize. Statutes provide elastic hooks.
Police act preemptively. Standard legal defenses fail against this architecture because our jurisprudence is built on outdated assumptions. Due process assumes discrete charges tied to defined conduct. Equal protection assumes comparable neutral enforcement. This system shatters both.
You see the failure of equal protection in the glaring asymmetry of how these tools are applied. You have the aggressive application of procedural statutes against individual powerless speakers contrasted sharply against the reluctance to fully pursue well documented elite criminal networks. This deliberate fragmentation of responsibility ensures that enforcement flows downward. It shields the powerful with immunity while transforming the legal system from an instrument of impartial justice into a tool for narrative control. The ultimate goal of this architecture is rarely the actual punishment of individual speakers.
The primary output is the creation of a massive systemic chilling effect. Effect. Sociologists call this the spiral of silence. When people observe speech resulting in wildly disproportionate consequences, they immediately infer hidden legal risks and adjust their behavior You can observe the symptoms of this acceleration everywhere. Researchers quietly abandon valid, complex lines of inquiry.
Journalists voluntarily narrow their scope to avoid crossing invisible lines. Citizens completely disengage from public oversight. This systemic intentional architecture effectively dismantles the public sphere through its high degree of suppression. We have arrived at a new reality. The boundaries of lawful expression are no longer set by written legible law.
They are determined by opaque algorithmic risk tolerance and enforcement discretion. Any framework that treats speech as a risk factor to be managed rather than a right to be protected is entirely incompatible with constitutional governance. Gradual normalized erosion threatens these rights more effectively than any explicit repeal. A society that allows this machine assisted bypass to persist may retain the language of freedom, but it has already quietly surrendered its sub
@buckkbob - Buck-Bob
🎶🔥Goys Are Back In Town🔥🎶 . 2026 - Remix . Stop Anti-Goyism . https://t.co/83OoFRBs9M
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread contrasts two cases: Barbara Wien, 66, avoids state charges for distributing fliers with Stephen Miller’s home address; Jonathan Dhillon, who threatened to dox a public official, is jailed with no bail. The poster says the cases are the same with different outcomes. Replies question motives, mention identity and security, and discuss free speech and public figures.
@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho
This is similar to Johnathan Cagles case, yet with the opposite results. The difference, Jonathan resides in an entirely different state than the alleged victim in his case, Harmeet the knitter Dhillon. He never showed up, nor did he say he was actually going to. Barbara Wien, 66, will not face state charges for distributing fliers with White House adviser Stephen Miller's home address, according to local prosecutor Parisa Dehghani-Tafti Wien’s lawyer, Bradley R. Haywood maintained she was engaging in protected free speech and that the investigation was an attempt to stifle dissent. Jonathan threatens to dox a public official to apply pressure to hold them accountable for their actions . He gets jail and no bail Another person ACTUALLY does what Jonathan only threatened to do. And gets no charges. I think they are exactly the same case. Two cases. Both are the same. Two different outcomes . Everyone needs to read this article. google.com/amp/s/www.cbsn…
@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta
@GooBiiSnacks She's jewish. Miller prolly tryna get free security. 😑 https://www.arlingtonmagazine.com/how-to-make-peace-not-war/2/ https://t.co/5SO4axyL7R
@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta
@GooBiiSnacks She works for/with "little friends for peace" look who follows that acct. 😑 https://t.co/Ra94OIEOpI
@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho
@LovesKetty15762 Who needs an FBI when we have us? FETCH THE ROPE
@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta
@GooBiiSnacks 😂 lady basically brainwashes kids to tolerate jews 🤮
@Pseudo_Prophet_ - Pseudo Prophet
A 13-year-old girl from Rotherham, UK goes missing from school. At 3 am, someone calls the police on the other side of town, claiming to have heard a girl scream. The police discovered 2 half-naked girls, delirious with 7 adult Pakistani men. They arrest the young girls.🤬 https://t.co/PvjAhFbgAy
Video Transcript AI Summary
A grandfather from Rotherham recalls a family story about his granddaughter who went missing one month after her thirteenth birthday. She went to school that day, then disappeared. Her mother immediately rang the police, who told her not to worry and that she would turn up as soon as she got hungry. She did not turn up that afternoon or that evening.
At 02:30 in the morning, a woman on the other side of Rotherham rang 999 because she heard a young girl screaming in the house next door. The police went to the house and found a 13-year-old girl with another young girl. The older girl was almost completely naked, blind drunk, and in the company of seven adult Pakistani men.
Southampton Police arrested the 13-year-old girl for being drunk and disorderly. They took her back to the station, charged her, and she was convicted. They did not question the men about why they were in a house with a 13-year-old girl who was naked and in the early hours of the morning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Family stories. One of the very first was from a grandfather who rang from Rotherham who wanted to talk about his granddaughter. One month after her thirteenth birthday, she'd gone to school and then gone missing and the school had rung up mom who'd immediately rung the police. Who'd said, don't worry love, she'll turn up as soon as she gets hungry. She didn't turn up that afternoon, that evening.
And at 02:30 in the morning, the next morning, a woman on the other side of Rotherham had picked up the phone and dialed 999 because she'd heard a young girl screaming in the house next door. Police had gone round to the house. They found this 13 year old girl with another young girl. She was almost completely naked. She was blind drunk and she was with seven adult Pakistani men.
She was drunk and leery. Southampton Police arrested the 13 year old girl for being drunk and disorderly. They took her back to the station, put her in the cells, eventually charged her, and she was convicted. They didn't even question the man as to why they were in a house with a 13 year old girl who was nearly naked in the early hours of the morning.
reSee.it AI Summary
I worked for the social services department and, by the time I left, I felt I’d seen the shift from liberal to Republican. I could verify benefits with SSNs to see if someone worked, owned property or cars, bank status, and salary. There’s a loophole for illegal aliens without SSNs to apply for food stamps, healthcare, housing, WIC, and childcare. If they have kids, those kids get benefits too, and some applicants show up with moneyed appearances. In liberal-led states like California, regulations aren’t tightened, so hard-working citizens pay the bill.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Woman who went to work for the social services department said she started out as a full liberal, but by the time she left the job, she came out a Republican. She says that through anyone’s Social Security number who applied for benefits, she was able to tell whether a person was working, owned property or cars, the status of their bank accounts, and their salary. However, she says there is a loophole that allows illegal aliens without a Social Security number to also apply for benefits such as food stamps, healthcare, housing, WIC, and childcare. If these illegals had children, their kids would receive benefits as well. According to her, the department had no way to verify whether these immigrants had income, owned property, or how much money they made. She claims that illegal immigrant parents would receive $1,200 per child, plus $275 per person in cash assistance and food stamps, not mentioning free housing or other benefits. She also says that some people applying for benefits would show up with their hair and nails done, carrying expensive accessories and driving luxury cars. Meanwhile, American citizens often would not qualify for the same benefits. She added that this exists especially in liberal-led states like California, where leadership does not put regulations in place and allows this kind of fraud and abuse, while hard-working citizens are left to pay the bill. If this doesn’t make you angry, I don’t know what will.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes their experience working in county social services and their political shift from Democrat to Republican. They explain how, for benefits programs, the presence of a social security number allows workers to determine if an applicant is working, has bank money, property, cars, tax income, and other sources, enabling assessment of eligibility and amount.
They claim a loophole exists for undocumented individuals. If an undocumented person applies for benefits and qualifies, they can receive full Medicaid, housing, migrant head start, and fully paid childcare. They note that if the undocumented parent has US citizen children, those children qualify for all the benefits and services as well. The speaker emphasizes that for an undocumented parent applying for benefits for their children, workers cannot tell if the family has banking income, property, or tax payments, since the parent lacks a social security number.
The speaker provides specific benefit amounts they observed: “$1,200 per kid plus $275 per person cash food stamps,” and adds that this does not include housing and “all the other benefits they get.” They state that in California, these benefits are not hidden. They recount anecdotes of people arriving with “nails did, hair done blonde, Gucci bags, Gucci glasses, driving up on escalades, chewing gum super loud,” asking for welfare checks. They describe a neighborhood where “70% of the people around me were undocumented” and who “lived the life,” including new cars and weekend parties. They mention an entitlement to “wake” (likely WIC) as well.
The speaker contrasts the situation with US citizens, claiming US citizens do not qualify for nothing, and observes a common pattern where undocumented women or moms would not work, while US citizen moms must work to afford living. They state they have nothing against undocumented immigrants personally, acknowledging a human perspective, but indicate that if they were undocumented, they would also take advantage of the loophole. They criticize the government, particularly California, for not implementing regulations to limit fraud and waste.
They argue that taxpayers pay for this waste and fraud, and that when the federal government enforces immigration laws, people become upset and confused about deportations after openly living and receiving benefits regardless of immigration status. They call for better practices, saying California and everyone must be on the same page.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Let me tell you something. So when I used to work for the county in social services, I went in full democrat, full liberal, and I came out republican. Let's talk about it. I used to work in the social services department, so any public benefits, we're talking Medicaid, food stamps, cash aid, disability, unemployment, veteran service, housing.
I did all the things, intake, case maintenance, you name it. So when somebody who has a social security number like you and I apply for benefits through their social security numbers, I could tell or any of the workers could tell using the social security number whether somebody is working, whether somebody has money in their bank, whether they have property, cars, how much money they made that year through their taxes, whether they have additional income. However, here's the loophole. If somebody without social security number, so somebody who's undocumented applies for benefits, and they do qualify for benefits by the way, they qualify for full Medicaid, housing, migrant hit start, that's fully paid childcare. Not to mention that if these people have any kids that are US citizens, meaning that they're born here, then they apply for benefits for their kids and their kids being US citizens qualify for all the benefits, all the services.
So if you have an undocumented undocumented parent, meaning a parent that does not have a social security number, apply for benefits for their children, there's absolutely no way as a worker, I could tell if they're banking income, if they have any property, if they did taxes, how much money they made. There's just no way. We're talking $1,200 per kid plus $275 per person cash food stamps. That doesn't include housing, all the other benefits they get. And here in California, they don't even care.
They don't even hide it. I used to have women and some men that would come in straight up with their nails did, their hair done blonde, bleach blonde, Gucci bags, Gucci glasses, driving up on escalades, chewing gum super loud, saying, Where's my welfare check? I used to live in a neighborhood where 70% of the people around me were undocumented. And man, did they live the life. New cars, parties every weekend.
Oh, yeah. They also qualify for wake. I forgot to say that. Meanwhile, as US citizens, we don't qualify for We don't qualify for nothing. It was so common where the women or the moms in my community that were undocumented, they wouldn't work.
They would have their own community of on of stay at home moms while Us US citizen moms would have to go out and work because we can't afford to live. And listen, I don't have anything against undocumented immigrants like, we're all human beings. I think that if I was an undocumented immigrant, I'd probably take advantage of this loophole too. It's the government, especially the state of California, especially liberal states. It's the government that doesn't allow or put in regulations to limit this kind of fraud and waste.
And we're all screwed. Not only us taxpayers who have to pay for this kind of waste and fraud, but when the federal government comes in to enforce immigration laws, people are upset. They're confused. They don't understand why is it that they're being deported. If they've been openly living and getting all these free benefits regardless of their immigration status.
We need to do better. The state of California needs to do better. We all need to get on the same page here.
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
Flock Safety Cameras 🤔 https://t.co/nxKoCJlPKp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: There are several flock cameras around our town—resources count over 30, with graphics showing their locations to be passed around for guests to see. These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family in public. They run by a company Palantir. This company claims they just record movement of vehicles and will reduce crime to zero, but people more educated than I on these cameras have proven this false when speaking to city councils. They do not monitor only where you drive, but also where you walk, what you do, what you say, what’s on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time. Today, I walked around and noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed toward the courtyard and the field, not toward roads, so why would it be pointed toward the river, not toward the streets if it’s just to monitor vehicles?
In order to bring the crime rate down to zero, they would need to predict crime before it happens, and I think that is a slippery slope. Some cities are discussing adding this AI to police body cameras, which would be constantly monitored by an AI, making a judgment call about releasing drones also controlled by this AI. Again, I see it as a very slippery slope along with the military drones that we’ve seen used over in Iran and in Ukraine. That is not my biggest problem with these, though. The owner of Palantir, Peter Thiel, is a man mentioned in the Epstein files over 2,200 times, making him the fourth most mentioned individual in the files.
He accepted $40,000,000 that we know about from Epstein. The victims of Epstein and Jalane Maxwell were human sex trafficked, reported almost all members consisting of high profile and ultra wealthy individuals, and they witnessed murders, ritual sacrifice, and cannibalism of infants. That being the consumption of human flesh and blood. They used code words for their victims like pizza, jerky, and grape soda. I have a hard time believing that any human being could do something so evil.
This is something that I would be told in a story about vampires. And I don’t know about you, but I think vampires are meant for campfires. They’re supposed to be a mythological being, not real and definitely should not be in charge of the security and safety of our city. I believe that any decent person would say no to giving up their safety and security to someone with such little value of a human life, let alone a potential ultra-wealthy pedophilic vampire in the Epstein files. So the gazebo is right here, right? So I’m trying to capture this area where we have people hanging out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's come to my attention that there are several flock cameras in our installed around our town. My resources count over 30 of them, and I have graphics showing where they are. I'd like to be passed around to the guests here tonight so they can see where these cameras are. These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you're out in public. They run they run by a company Palantir.
This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate to zero. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false when speaking to their city councils. They do not monitor where you drive, but they also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what's on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time. Today, I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets if it's just to monitor vehicles?
Also, order to bring the crime rate down to zero, they would need to be able to predict crime before it happens, and I think that that is a slippery slope. Some cities are discussing adding this AI to police body cameras, which would be constantly monitored by an AI, which would make a judgment call about releasing drones also controlled by this AI. Again, I see it as a very slippery slope along with the military drones that we've seen used over in Iran and in Ukraine. The that is not my biggest problem with these though. The owner of Palantir, Peter Thiel, is a man mentioned in the Epstein files over 2,200 times, making him the fourth most mentioned individual in the files.
He accepted $40,000,000 that we know about from Epstein. The victims of Epstein and Jalane Maxwell were human sex trafficked, reported almost all members consisting of high profile and ultra wealthy individuals, and they witnessed murders, ritual sacrifice, and cannibalism of infants. That being the consumption of human flesh and blood. They used code words for their victims like pizza, jerky, and grape soda. I have a hard time believing that any human being could do something so evil.
This is something that I would be told in a story about vampires. And I don't know about you, but I think that vampires are meant for campfires. They are supposed to be a mythological being, and they're not supposed to be real and definitely should not be in charge of the security and safety of our city. I believe that any decent person would say no to giving up their safety and security to someone with such little value of a human life, let alone a potential ultra wealthy pedophilic vampire in the Epstein files. So the gazebo is right here.
Right? So I'm trying to capture this area where we have people hanging out.
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
Flock Safety Cameras 🤔 https://t.co/nxKoCJlPKp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: It has come to my attention that there are several flock cameras installed around our town. My resources count over 30 of them, and I have graphics showing where they are. I’d like to be passed around to the guests here tonight so they can see where these cameras are. These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you’re out in public. They run by a company Palantir.
This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate to zero. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false when speaking to their city councils. They do not monitor where you drive, but they also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what’s on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time. Today, I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets if it’s just to monitor vehicles?
Also, in order to bring the crime rate down to zero, they would need to be able to predict crime before it happens, and I think that that is a slippery slope. Some cities are discussing adding this AI to police body cameras, which would be constantly monitored by an AI, which would make a judgment call about releasing drones also controlled by this AI. Again, I see it as a very slippery slope along with the military drones that we’ve seen used over in Iran and in Ukraine. That is not my biggest problem with these though. The owner of Palantir, Peter Thiel, is a man mentioned in the Epstein files over 2,200 times, making him the fourth most mentioned individual in the files.
He accepted $40,000,000 that we know about from Epstein. The victims of Epstein and Jalane Maxwell were human sex trafficked, reported almost all members consisting of high profile and ultra wealthy individuals, and they witnessed murders, ritual sacrifice, and cannibalism of infants. That being the consumption of human flesh and blood. They used code words for their victims like pizza, jerky, and grape soda. I have a hard time believing that any human being could do something so evil.
This is something that I would be told in a story about vampires. And I don’t know about you, but I think that vampires are meant for campfires. They are supposed to be a mythological being, and they’re not supposed to be real and definitely should not be in charge of the security and safety of our city. I believe that any decent person would say no to giving up their safety and security to someone with such little value of a human life, let alone a potential ultra wealthy pedophilic vampire in the Epstein files. So the gazebo is right here.
Right? So I’m trying to capture this area where we have people hanging out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's come to my attention that there are several flock cameras in our installed around our town. My resources count over 30 of them, and I have graphics showing where they are. I'd like to be passed around to the guests here tonight so they can see where these cameras are. These cameras utilize AI to track you and your family when you're out in public. They run they run by a company Palantir.
This company claims that they just record movement of vehicles and they will reduce the crime rate to zero. However, people much more educated than I on these cameras have proven this to be false when speaking to their city councils. They do not monitor where you drive, but they also monitor where you walk, what you do, what you say, what's on your phone when you walk by, and they spy on you all the time. Today, I walked around and I noticed the one down by the bridge was pointed towards the courtyard and the field, not towards any roads. So why would it be pointed towards the river, not towards the streets if it's just to monitor vehicles?
Also, order to bring the crime rate down to zero, they would need to be able to predict crime before it happens, and I think that that is a slippery slope. Some cities are discussing adding this AI to police body cameras, which would be constantly monitored by an AI, which would make a judgment call about releasing drones also controlled by this AI. Again, I see it as a very slippery slope along with the military drones that we've seen used over in Iran and in Ukraine. The that is not my biggest problem with these though. The owner of Palantir, Peter Thiel, is a man mentioned in the Epstein files over 2,200 times, making him the fourth most mentioned individual in the files.
He accepted $40,000,000 that we know about from Epstein. The victims of Epstein and Jalane Maxwell were human sex trafficked, reported almost all members consisting of high profile and ultra wealthy individuals, and they witnessed murders, ritual sacrifice, and cannibalism of infants. That being the consumption of human flesh and blood. They used code words for their victims like pizza, jerky, and grape soda. I have a hard time believing that any human being could do something so evil.
This is something that I would be told in a story about vampires. And I don't know about you, but I think that vampires are meant for campfires. They are supposed to be a mythological being, and they're not supposed to be real and definitely should not be in charge of the security and safety of our city. I believe that any decent person would say no to giving up their safety and security to someone with such little value of a human life, let alone a potential ultra wealthy pedophilic vampire in the Epstein files. So the gazebo is right here.
Right? So I'm trying to capture this area where we have people hanging out.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Republicans now hold the national edge in the 2026 House ratings—211R, 208D, 16 tossups—after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down the 10D-1R map, with redistricting across Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama reshaping the map. Hakeem Jeffries is livid. The redistricting fight is a disaster for Democrats. Keep playing hardball.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 JUST IN: In a STUNNING turnaround, Republicans now hold the NATIONAL EDGE in the 2026 House ratings after the Virginia Supreme Court strikes down the 10D-1R map Hakeem Jeffries is livid! 211 Republican, 208 Democrat, and 16 tossup, per Crystal Ball 🔥 THAT'S *BEFORE* the red Southern redistricting across a combination of Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama and others The redistricting war has become an UTTER DISASTER for Democrats. KEEP PLAYING HARDBALL 🇺🇸 h/t @OpenSourceZone
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
Theoretical Physicist @MichioKaku says UFO files just changed EVERYTHING. https://t.co/1Bouf9xOvm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Doctor. Machio Kaku is a theoretical physicist. Doctor, on a scale of one to 10, how excited are you about this UFO release?
Speaker 1: I would put it at a 10 because we're at a turning point. For decades we had to rely upon eyewitness accounts of housewives, truck drivers, people would snicker and laugh at them. Now we're talking about huge files that are top secret that for the first time in modern history are being given to the American public. So I'd like to congratulate President Trump for having the nerve to go against recommendations by the FBI and the CIA to release these files so that independent researchers, scientists can go over them and we can make up our own minds rather than having the CIA make up our minds.
Speaker 0: And the CIA apparently is still flooding the full release When you hear or see about a UFO that goes like that, up, down, left, right at 90 degree angles so fast, you can't even believe it. What does that tell you? It tells me
Speaker 1: that that the laws of centrifugal force should crush the bones of the people inside the flying saucer. So either there is basically an automated flying saucer, so there are no bones to crack as the thing goes zigzagging left and right, or it represents a very high level of intelligence to create something like that. So in other words, we humans cannot get into a spaceship that goes zigzagging like that. Only aliens can, but even their bones would break. So it must be a very high level of automated computer technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor. Machio Kaku is a theoretical physicist. Doctor, on a scale of one to 10, how excited are you about this UFO release?
Speaker 1: I would put it at a 10 because we're at a turning point. For decades. We had to rely upon eyewitness accounts of housewives, truck drivers, people would snicker and laugh at them. Now we're talking about huge files that are top secret that for the first time in modern history are being given to the American public. So I'd like to congratulate President Trump for having the nerve to go against recommendations by the FBI and the CIA to release these files so that independent researchers, scientists can go over them and we can make up our own minds rather than having the CIA make up our minds.
Speaker 0: And the CIA apparently is still flooding the full release When you hear or see about a UFO that goes like that, up, down, left, right at 90 degree angles so fast, you can't even believe it. What does that tell you? It tells me
Speaker 1: that that the laws of centrifugal force should crush the bones of the people inside the flying saucer. So either there is basically an automated flying saucer, so there are no bones to crack as the thing goes zigzagging left and right, or it represents a very high level of intelligence to create something like that. So in other words, we humans cannot get into a spaceship that goes zigzagging like that. Only aliens can, but even their bones would break. So it must be a very high level of automated computer technology.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
April 8th, 2026. Declassified UAP Video. A compilation of trench 1 disclosures. Draw your own conclusions. https://t.co/5bK07RcNhT
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
Historic UAP Release: Key Details from the First Batch of Declassified Files Announcing my AI pipeline to process this and all future UAP releases. Today the current administration, through the Department of War and an interagency effort known as the Presidential Unsealing and
@HealthRanger - HealthRanger
"Shadow Food" and the man-made catastrophe of incoming mass famine that's getting worse by the day... https://t.co/xg1xA65mj9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says our food today is largely artificial, what he calls shadow food. Soils are largely depleted for many generations, and without adding fertilizers (N, P, and K), crops do not produce hardly at all. There is a nonlinear response: if you reduce fertilizer by 10% on a high-fertilizer crop like corn, you get far more than a 10% reduction in yield—perhaps a 30% reduction for certain crops. This is why American farmers are switching from corn to soy, a legume that doesn’t need as much fertilizer. This shift will affect dietary habits as well, including more soy lattes and soybeans/tofu. He notes the bottom line: our food depends on a supply chain that comes out of the Persian Gulf, and few people realized that until recently.
Speaker 0 asks whether the catastrophe is due to man-made causes (the war and its consequences) or a system that is too fragile.
Speaker 1 responds: both. Population growth is strongly tied to low-cost food production and abundance. For a long time, the United States and other countries encouraged populations to eat more and have more children, reflecting the original USDA food guidance years ago. That era served post-World War II needs because malnutrition and stillbirths were higher then. Today, the problem is Americans overeating but undernourished—getting too many calories but not enough nutrition—because food has been transformed into shadow food. It looks like a head of lettuce but lacks the nutrition of wild lettuce or what US soils used to produce with trace minerals like selenium, zinc, and copper. Food results from turning hydrocarbons into something you can eat: gas makes fertilizer; oil powers tractors and transport to grocery stores. Cheap energy yields cheap food; scarce energy yields scarce food. It will hit some areas first and more severely than others. It won’t be as severe in the United States as elsewhere. US consumers’ ability to handle economic pain is limited because many families are living paycheck to paycheck, without a large savings cushion, unlike cultures like Japan that can weather famines more easily.
Speaker 0 ends with “Bright videos.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's go ahead and jump into the article here because the the very opening line here kinda has my attention. Not only is the first category a madman catastrophe, but then you said what I'm about to tell you is not a prediction. It's a warning based on hard evidence. Can you can you distinguish the difference between those two things?
Speaker 1: Yes. And really, that that that's a great segue from what we were just talking about is that our food today is largely artificial. That is, I call it shadow food, actually. You know, I I've been a pretty vocal critic of a lot of the agricultural practices of our modern world. And the truth is that our soils are largely depleted.
They they have been for, you know, many generations. And and without the addition of these fertilizers, n, p, and k, going into the soils, crops just simply do not produce hardly at all. And it's a it's a nonlinear response. What I mean by that is if you reduce fertilizer by 10% on a typical crop, let's say a high fertilizer hungry crop like corn, you get far more than a 10% reduction in the crop yield. So a 10% drop can result in a 30% reduction on certain types of crops.
This is why American farmers are switching right now from corn to things like soy, which is a legume that doesn't need nearly as much fertilizer. So so, Daniel, we're all about to get, you know, extra soy lattes and and soybeans and soy tofu instead of corn because of this fertilizer shortage. This is gonna be a shift that will affect even people's dietary habits as well. But but, anyway, the bottom line is our food depends on a supply chain that comes out of the Persian Gulf, and few people actually realized that until just recently.
Speaker 0: So, continuing on down there, about how it's a man made catastrophe. Is is the is the catastrophe that you're talking about, the man made part, just because of the war we started and all the consequences, or did we build a system that was too fragile?
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, both, I would say. Yeah. Remember that population growth is strongly tied to low cost of food production and, of course, food abundance. So for a long time, The United States Of America and other countries really wanted to encourage their populations to eat as much as possible, have more children, grow the population. This was where the original food guide pyramid came from, the USDA, decades ago.
It was all about really, hey, everybody, eat more food, which actually served America's purpose in the post World War two era because back then, a lot of Americans were malnourished, and there were a lot more stillbirths and things like that resulting from malnutrition. Of course, we have the opposite problem today where we have Americans overeating but undernourished, meaning they're getting too many calories but not enough actual nutrition. That's because the food has been transformed into what I mentioned earlier. I call it shadow food where, yeah, you know, it looks like a head of lettuce, but it doesn't have the same nutrition as the as like wild lettuce or what US soils used to produce with the trace minerals like selenium and zinc and copper and things like that that would be in the food supply. It's also mentioned, you know, food is the result of turning hydrocarbons into something you can eat.
Think about that. So you can take gas, make fertilizer. Fertilizer makes food. You can take oil. Oil powers the tractors.
It powers the transport, trucks that bring food to the grocery store. Cheap energy results in cheap food. Scarce energy results in scarce food. And then it's just a question of which areas will be hit by the scarcity first and how severe will it be. And it won't be as severe in The United States as it will be elsewhere around the world.
There's no question about that. But the ability of US consumers to handle economic pain is pretty shallow because so many American families are just living on the edge right now paycheck to paycheck. They don't have as much of a buffer of savings as cultures like, let's say, Japan. You know, a savings intensive type of culture. They can make it through famines more easily or food scarcity more easily than can typical American consumers.
Speaker 0: Bright videos.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss how Trump is powerless to end the Ukraine proxy war and why Europe has become Russia's principal adversary, in a Victory Day special with Dr. Dmitri Trenin of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council.
@GUnderground_TV - Going Underground
🚨NEW EPISODE OF GOING UNDERGROUND⚡️ Trump is POWERLESS to End Ukraine🇺🇦 Proxy War, Europe is Russia’s🇷🇺 PRINCIPAL ADVERSARY—Dr. Dmitri Trenin How much longer will the Russia-NATO proxy war in Ukraine last? Why has Trump failed to end the war? Why has Europe become Russia's principal adversary? All this and more on this Victory Day special episode of Going Underground with Dr. Dmitri Trenin, member of Russia’s Foreign and Defence Policy Council.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Afshun Rataty opens Going Underground from the UAE as Russia marks Victory Day and asserts Russia’s contribution to international peace by defeating fascism and Nazism, while noting the UAE has intercepted missiles and drones aimed by Iran. He claims millions have been killed, wounded, or displaced by the Trump-Netanyahu wars on Iran and Lebanon, and accuses Western Europe of perpetuating lies about the Soviet contribution to World War II in schools and universities. He suggests Trump triangulated over the deaths of Iranian schoolgirls, referencing Miriam Adelson and the midterms, and notes a long phone call with Putin, with Putin allegedly not revealing how war and rising oil prices aid the Russian economy. He mentions Britain and the EU continuing to fund Zelensky, and that Trump may have congratulated Russia on Victory Day.
Dmitry Trenin, former director of the Carnegie Moscow Center and member of Russia’s Foreign and Defense Policy Council, joins from Moscow. He calls Victory Day the most important date on the Russian calendar and says Europe is Russia’s principal adversary for the first time since 1945, framing the Ukraine war as a proxy war with Europe in the front line. He cautions that victory will be a long process, not simply a return to the post‑Cold War era, and that Russia’s triumph will be “against those elements in Ukraine that are branded Nazi,” while European elites have portrayed Russia as a bogeyman for ulterior motives.
The host challenges the notion of a narrow window of opportunity under a Trump presidency, suggesting Trump would provide more arms to Ukraine. Trenin responds that Russia’s war is restrained and that Kyiv and Donbas share similar populations, framing the conflict as driven by Western manipulation. They discuss eight years of Donetsk and Lugansk separatist resistance, Ukrainian operations, and Russian support, noting the Western European countries have shouldered substantial costs to arm and support Kyiv, with the United States still providing substantial aid even as Trump’s involvement wanes.
The discussion touches on Western Europe’s economic strain and militarization as a means to consolidate the EU, while Trenin argues that the United States is guided by a deep state more than any single president, asserting Trump proposed a peace framework in August 2025 that Putin agreed to, but Washington did not press European leaders to accept, indicating limited impact of Trump’s direct influence on the war’s course.
They discuss Putin’s planned visit to Beijing, timed independently of Trump’s visit, and reflect on US-China relations. Trenin suggests China is hardening its stance against the United States and that Moscow does not fear deals between Xi and Trump at Russia’s expense. They also consider Armenia’s balancing act between Russia and the EU, noting Armenia’s heavy Russian trade yet Western-leaning political leadership.
The program closes with well-wishes for Victory Day, acknowledging ongoing NATO-related conflicts and promising further coverage of US wars in West Asia. The closing credits invite viewers to watch on rumble and social media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Afshun Rataty. Welcome to Going Underground broadcasting all around the world as Russia celebrates its victory day and its contribution to international peace by defeating the forces of fascism and Nazism. We're broadcasting from a UAE that has meanwhile this week been intercepting missiles and drones targeted by Iran. Millions have been killed, wounded, or displaced by the Trump Netanyahu wars on Iran and Lebanon. Just as lies about the Soviet contribution to victory in World War two continue in the history books, universities, and schools of Western Europe, there are lies about the Trump Netanyahu war in this region.
All week, it was difficult to ascertain how Trump was triangulating de facto over the dead bodies of 168 schoolgirls in Iran between his paymistress Miriam Adelson, November's midterm US election disaster, and his upcoming visit to China. NATO propaganda media repeated lies about how open the Strait Of Hormuz was when, of course, it has been open since Trump assassinated Iran's leaders only to those Iran allows through its waters. Trump did have a long phone call with Putin and may have called today to congratulate Russia on victory day, Perhaps but Putin won't let on how the war and spike in oil prices aided the Russian economy. That's, of course, as the so called military operation special military operation drags on and Britain and the EU, amidst economic catastrophe, continue to pour money and weapons to dictator Zelensky. Joining me now from Moscow again is former lieutenant colonel in the Soviet and Russian armed forces, doctor Dmitry Trenin, who is on Russia's Foreign and Defense Policy Council.
Dmitry, thanks so much for coming back on. Before we get to the war in this region, the war in Europe, I should just say the Venice Biennale started, and, a headline struck me in, the propaganda media of, NATO nations is the from the Financial Times. Russia's return to Venice risks rendering Biennale irrelevant. So even the idea of Russian artists exhibiting in Western Europe is seen as somehow sinful. On victory day, what does that make you think about how the Soviet Union freed Western Europe and how Western Europe sees Russia today?
Speaker 1: Well, actually, it's close. It's it's perhaps the most important date in the Russian calendar. But today, rather than oh, let's say, of course, you we we mark the anniversary and we think about the people who fought and gave their lives for their country, for the liberation of other nations. But one thought is very, very concerning. For the first time I would say this year, you have to admit that it is Europe again that is Russia's principal adversary of the day.
This was not the case since 1945, since the defeat of Hitler Germany. But today, Russia is at war again. And this is not simply a war between Russia and Ukraine. It is a war between Russia and the West, a proxy war from the Western side, but a very direct war from the Russian side. And for the first time in that war, it is Europe that is that is in the first ranks of those who are our adversaries today.
It's a chilling thought, and it gives you pause when you celebrate because it's a celebration that is linked to very serious and very troubling thoughts about the future.
Speaker 0: Except it's not a small British oligarch elite that support the Nazis. Now it's Britain supporting the Nazis in Ukraine, of course, which leads us to the question, I mean, when is the victory day gonna happen against the proxy forces in Ukraine? When when when is Russia going to celebrate that?
Speaker 1: Well, it's a very different war from the war of nineteen forty one, forty five. And I think it would be wrong to simply lay over the memories the current war, compare it one on one with the memories of the past. It's a different war and victory means something else than it meant in 1945. So I think that today, in today's terms, the the principal goals of Russia's policies and the principal goals of the special military operation will take, I would say, a long time to accomplish. It means that although the operation itself in a limited form will succeed, I'm pretty sure that victory will be ours.
But beyond that, Russia will face a hostile Europe. It will face elements within Ukraine that will be outside of Russian control, that will try to do as much harm to Russia as they can. So it's going to be a long slog. It's a long war that Russia is waging today. And it's not like next year or in two years' time, there'll be peace and Russians and Europeans will celebrate together as they did for a long time after the end of the Cold War, is going to take so much more time.
And it will take so much more effort on our side to reach the goal and to achieve victory. But as I said, victory will be ours, but it doesn't mean that it will be victory over Europe or over Ukraine. It will be a victory against those elements in Ukraine that are branded Nazi, meaning ultranationalist and and ideological descendants of Hitlerism. And those forces in Europe, primarily among the elites that have built Russia into bogeyman again, and that used the Russia threat for their own ulterior motives.
Speaker 0: But isn't the point that Russia is failing to capitalize on the chaos of a Trump presidency and after Trump will come, back to normal, the the deep state, so called, in The United States that, created the conditions for the proxy war in the first place and will be, pouring ever more weapons than even Trump has been. Trump obviously has been giving satellite guidance. And Russia is clearly failing in this window of the Trump presidency before his, perhaps, impeachment after the midterms.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't know about Russia Russia failing to use this window of opportunity. I would I would disagree that there was or that there is a window of opportunity. Trump
Speaker 0: Not necessarily through negotiations, which are clearly appearing to be pointless, but through military means.
Speaker 1: Well, through military means, I I think this is my my own conclusion. I think that the Russian way of war, certainly the Russian way of of waging this particular war is extremely restrained. And reasons for that, Ukraine's long bill has long been considered, you know, part of the bigger Russian nation. Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities. People on the battlefield on the Ukrainian side look most of them look the same as the people on the Russian side.
If you listen to what the prisoners of war are saying, the way they are saying things. So it's to to many Russians, including those who are among the decision makers, These people are misguided. They are being used by the West in the West's very long battle, very long war against Russia starting maybe in the eighteenth century or maybe in the seventeenth century or maybe even earlier than that. Some people point to the sixteenth century as the first war between Russia and Europe, the Livon the so called Livonian War. So Yeah.
But I mean,
Speaker 0: on on the restraint issue. On the I mean, yeah. I mean, I was taught at school not about the 27,000,000 that gave gave their lives for the fight against Nazism. I was taught about the Crimean War when I went to school. So as regards restraint, I mean, on Mondays going underground, we're speaking to a former US treasury official who says, you don't show restraint against a hegemonic power.
And the same criticism can be leveled against Iran as it can be against Putin and his conduct of this war. Restraint is what gives the opponent their advantage.
Speaker 1: Well, I think this war, you would you would appreciate that this war did not was not called a war and didn't was not started as a war. It was started as a special operation. Let's say, more of a political operation on steroids with the military essentially backing the internal Ukrainian forces toppling the regime that came to power due to a coup in 2014. So this was something that very soon was exposed as wishful thinking. And after even after that, the war was fought with only a fraction of the Russian military forces.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The rest during the restraint period, people were dying in Luhansk and Donetsk.
Speaker 1: That's true. I mean, they were dying during the eight years of neither war nor peace. After the coup in in Kiev in 2014, the Republics Of Dundas, the Lugansk and the Donetsk Republics held a referendum. They declared independence. And of course, this this was met with military force sent by Kyiv.
And then for eight years, Donetsk and Lugansk held out against the forces of Kyiv with Russian support.
Speaker 0: Right. Well, without going through the history
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: All over and all over again, isn't the fact that Russia is not winning the SMO? And in fact, the reason why it appears to be winning is because of the defeats by The United States and the vassal powers in Western Europe keep cascading around the world, whether it be The US defeat against Iran and the complete economic catastrophes that have been caused by themselves in the European Union and in Britain. It's not so much Russia winning. It's the failure of the opponents as they repeat repeated strategies that fail.
Speaker 1: Well, their strategies failed at the Middle East. If you look at the the at the Ukrainian theater, I think they managed to muster their resources. I'm talking first of all about the Europeans, and they managed to put up a very significant force on the Ukrainian side, arm them, guide them, give them everything that they need from intel to to weapons to to production facilities for their drones and and stuff like that. So I would say that although Russia moved forward on the battlefield, although slowly and incrementally on the Ukrainian side, there was a major spike in primarily European involvement in the war. Mister Trump has reduced America's involvement, but even then, The United States still provides Ukraine with a lot of with with with a lot of assistance in in in various fields, and that discounts.
I think Russia certainly could have could have destroyed lots of very important targets in Ukraine, but Kyiv is still very much a normal city. So you do not compare Kyiv to Beirut or Tehran or to one of the other cities that have been targets of US, NATO, Israeli attacks.
Speaker 0: Dmitry Dranen. I'll just have to stop you there more from a member of Russia's Foreign and Defense Policy Council after this break. Welcome back to going underground. I'm still here with the former director of the Carnegie Moscow Center and now member of Russia's foreign and defense policy council, doctor Dmitry Trenin. Dmitry, I interrupted you as you were describing how thanks to Western Europe bankrupting itself, it's managed to subsidize Kyiv.
Speaker 1: Yes. They actually have been doing that at at at a huge expense to themselves. But they see this Russia threat as or what they call the Russia threat as extremely useful in their own attempt to consolidate the European Union, crumbling as it was before the war. They managed to try to relaunch their economies by through militarization. And they're trying above all to keep themselves in power.
Speaker 0: Yeah, exactly. On that point.
Speaker 1: On that actually fairly fairly successful on all those three counts.
Speaker 0: But on that point, and going back to what I was talking about in part one about a window, won't that get worse? As the economies of Western Europe get worse and worse, and as they divorce themselves from The United States, will they see their only root out, those in power, the powerful elites that run, I would call it a totalitarian Western Europe without freedom of speech, the only way out is more war with Russia. And, again, that means Russia is losing the strategic window before the midterms to act.
Speaker 1: Well, I again, I don't think that there is such a big window, and I don't think that it that it actually exists. The United States is not so much does not so much operate on the orders given by Donald Trump. As you yourself point out, The United States is ruled by the deep state, and that deep state has been there for a long time and will be there after Donald Trump leaves the White House. So Donald Trump is not all that essential for the fate of of the for the for the for fate of the outcome of the war, for the for the fate of this confrontation. Let me tell you this.
Donald Trump allegedly, maybe not allegedly, that there's been a lot of confirmation, but Donald Trump came up with a proposal back in August 2025 on how to end the Ukraine war. And president Putin agreed to use that proposal as a basis for peace settlement. And since then, since August, mister Trump has not been able to lean hard on the Europeans or to order the Ukrainian client of The United States to accept the proposal agreed upon notionally between Washington and Moscow. And this tells you how significant Donald Trump is to the conduct of the war, to the to the outcome of the war. The war continues without Donald Trump's very active participation.
Speaker 0: I'm not sure what they must have spoken about for ninety minutes then when they spoke on the phone, Trump and Putin. And afterwards, Trump said, I'd much rather have been involved with ending the war with Ukraine. I said, before you help me out, I want to end your war as regards Putin's suggestion that Russia should be part of the negotiations over ending the war with on Iran.
Speaker 1: Well, it's so it's so easy. I mean, he could have he could have prevailed. And I think that the leverage that the president of The United States has over the leaders, so called leaders of Europe is is enough to make them agree to something that the president of The United States has has managed to win the backing of of the president of Russia. He could have ordered Zelensky to follow what what Trump, his principal benefactor, his principal backer, has already agreed with Putin. And yet this is not happening.
It means that the president of The United States is essentially powerless to insist on something that is of central importance to ending this conflict.
Speaker 0: I mean, certainly, Putin appears to believe the Trump Xi visit that at the time of this recording is still on later next week. How do you characterize why Putin might want to visit just after the Trump Xi scheduled meeting in Beijing?
Speaker 1: Well, I think that Putin's visit dates have been agreed well before the the rescheduling of the Trump visit to Beijing. Trump was originally supposed to be there I think in March. And Putin's visit was timed originally to happen after Victory Day in Russia. So in the second half of May, that was that that is the time that is often used, the time slot often used for Russian visits to Beijing. So there's no coincidence there.
I don't think there's any any reason to believe that somehow the the visit by Trump to Beijing and the visit by Putin are connected, or that the two visits are connected to help end the Ukraine war. I don't think that there's much of a connection, frankly.
Speaker 0: I mean, of course, in the propaganda press of The United States, the Salzburg and New York Times, they're all over it. Trump and Xi face a Nixon Mao moment. I think it wasn't long ago they were talking about a reverse Nixon and that Trump was getting closer to Putin. What do you think fears are in government circles in Moscow about any deals between Xi Jinping and Donald Trump, perhaps at Russia's expense?
Speaker 1: Well, I don't think that there are any fears at this point. Of course, Russians are watching US China relations very closely just as the Chinese are watching Russian American relations very closely, which is a normal thing. You you should pay attention to these things because they can matter to you. But my understanding is that the Chinese are increasingly becoming aware of the nature of their conflict with The United States, And that the the idea that somehow that conflict could be averted, that the compromise could be reached, that China can win an equal treatment from The United States, these things are fading. And I think that the new tendency in China is to take a much tougher attitude toward The United States, not hoping for a nice compromise that people were very much expecting during the Hu Jintao Hu Jintao era in China just before he Xi Jinping came to power in the early twenty tens.
So I don't think that people in Moscow are fretting very much about what happens when when Trump visits China and sits down with and discusses the world.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Clearly, they dismissed the threat of sanctions from Trump over Iran very quickly indeed. But then, of course, could that mean that Trump caves in to China and makes a deal perhaps over Taiwan? Who knows? And Trump himself has a limited shelf life.
This allows US China relations to progress whilst whilst the war the proxy war on Russia through Ukraine continues.
Speaker 1: Well, I think that it's it's very likely that Trump would want to have some kind of a of a pause in the conflict with with China. He cannot handle a widening conflict and or an intensifying conflict with China even at the time when relations between Russia and the West are deteriorating very fast. But you again, you mentioned that Trump may be just months away from an attempted impeachment in Washington. And Trump, again, Trump is in the middle is at the midpoint in his second presidency. And whatever happens at the polls in November is going to be less relevant to setting US foreign policy as well as domestic policy than he is even now.
So an agreement with Trump may be not worth that much. And I think that the Chinese are also looking beyond Trump today. What happens after not only after November 26, but November 28 when Trump will will finally I mean, he may he may have to end his presidential career earlier. Who knows? But that's the ultimate date.
And you need to look to to look ahead, and you have to look beyond Trump. I think he may may have spent much of his political force until this present moment, and the debacle in Iran or with Iran may cost him dearly in the remaining two years. Yeah. And we know that that deep state doesn't like China.
Speaker 0: I mean, one could see it this victory day as if Russia's lost, say, Venezuela to a certain extent. It lost Syria. And in Armenia, there was a conference in the past few days. Zelensky was there. Mark Ruta car Mark Carney was there, the man that at the Bank of England stole some Venezuelan gold, I think, Ursula von der Leyen.
And what did you make of this happening in the Caucasus, South Caucasus? What's what does that say about Russian influence?
Speaker 1: Well, Russian influence certainly exists, but Russia is not using it very much. Armenia today depends enormously on the Russian trade. Out of the entire trade turnover of Armenia, half of it is with the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. And let's say 90% or close to 90% of that is Armenia's trade with Russia. Armenia has the Armenian leadership has come up with with an idea of, if you like, sitting on two chairs at the same time, they are benefiting hugely.
Their GDP is growing very fast. They're benefiting hugely on its trade with Russia. But politically, they want to side with the European Union. And Pashinyan, the prime minister for a long time has been very closely associated with pro Western forces and, you know, NGOs close to Soros and the like. So it's it's not that we have only now discovered that he is taking Armenia away from Russia.
Again, Russia is not the Soviet Union, not only in size or in the or in the its influence around the world, its philosophy. Its political philosophy is different. Okay.
Speaker 0: Dmitry, Alas, we're out of
Speaker 1: building an empire. We're out
Speaker 0: of time, Alas, but happy Victory Day. Thank you, Dmitry Trennan. Thank you. You're welcome. That's it for the show.
Our condolences to those of you bereaved by today's NATO nation wars of aggression. We'll be back on Monday for more continuing coverage of US wars on West Asia with an official in the Reagan administration who has nothing but condemnation for Trump's wars of aggression. Until then, keep in touch via all our social media. If it's not censored in your country, head to our channel, going underground TV on rumble.com to watch new and old episodes of going underground. See you Monday.
@thedreydossier - Drey
babe wake up, public health infrastructure just got nerfed. https://t.co/Q4YwsJZTT7
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
I remember who Dan Bilzerian @DanBilzerian went to Dubai and Qatar with… Do you? IYKYK When you remember who he went with and how many Democrat members of Congress have affiliated with that person, you will start to see what’s happening… https://t.co/RmZJJgvmA0
@jakeg_official - JAKEGTV
A solution to the problem they caused 🦠 #Hantavirüs https://t.co/euEz6ZtYg7
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace a link: Oceanwide Expeditions’ MV Hondius and the Fentener van Vlissingen family via BCD Leisure, which sells Oceanwide trips. The family’s SHV/Makro interests edge into healthcare, with ties to Erasmus MC, and to Ab Osterhaus, Marion Koopmans, Diederik Gommers, and Marco Goeijenbier through ESWI and vaccine/patent networks. This web raises questions about whether these connections influence public narratives around pandemics and outbreaks.
@FrauHodl - FrauHodl
English translation: - May 9, 2026 - By Martin Vrijland - Oceanwide Expeditions - MV Hondius What is the link between Oceanwide Expeditions, Ab Osterhaus, Marion Koopmans, Diederik Gommers, Marco Goeijenbier, and the billionaire Fentener van Vlissingen family? Oceanwide Expeditions, the Dutch company behind the MV Hondius (where the alleged hantavirus outbreak occurred), appears to be linked to the billionaire Fentener van Vlissingen family. Of course, one could dismiss it as a mere coincidence, but that would be too simplistic. How exactly does it connect? Well, BCD Leisure — part of the BCD Group owned by the Dutch billionaire Fentener van Vlissingen family — sells tickets for Oceanwide Expeditions, including cruises on the MV Hondius. Although BCD Leisure does not own any ships itself, it offers Oceanwide’s expeditions to its business and private clients. Cruises on the MV Hondius form a prominent part of this offering due to the ship’s modern facilities and focus on polar voyages to the Arctic and Antarctica. The Fentener van Vlissingen family has two major business branches. BCD Group was founded by John Fentener van Vlissingen (†2025) and focuses on business travel and leisure. SHV Holdings, headed by Annemiek Fentener van Vlissingen, is the broader family business behind companies such as Makro and Mammoet. Annemiek attended the 2025 Bilderberg Conference in Stockholm. Through SHV’s investment vehicle NPM Capital, the family is active in the healthcare sector with a buy-and-build strategy and stakes in NL Healthcare Clinics, Bergman Clinics, and Mentaal Beter, among others. Although the family is not a well-known direct producer of medicines, John Fentener van Vlissingen stated in 2021 that the pharmaceutical industry is one of the larger clients of their broader business activities. Martje Fentener van Vlissingen was, until recently, director of the Erasmus Experimental Animal Center (EDC) in Rotterdam, where she worked for over twenty years. Also connected to Erasmus MC was virologist Ab Osterhaus, who led the Virology department there for decades. Ab OsterhausIn 2001, Ab Osterhaus founded Viroclinics from Erasmus MC, a company specialized in testing vaccines and antiviral drugs for the pharmaceutical industry. Osterhaus also held shares in the Swedish company Isconova, which filed a patent application in 2011 together with Viroclinics for a vaccine adjuvant. The patent was granted in the name of Erasmus MC and Novavax. Isconova was subsequently sold to Novavax for $29.6 million. The share sale personally netted Osterhaus €5.6 million — an amount he initially refused to confirm but eventually acknowledged to Follow the Money. At the same time, from 2000 onward, Osterhaus was chairman of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI), which described itself as a link between the WHO, the Robert Koch Institute, and the University of Connecticut. ESWI’s funding came entirely from pharmaceutical companies, including Novartis, Hoffman-La Roche, Baxter Vaccines, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi Pasteur. These are the same companies that earned billions from pandemic purchases following the WHO pandemic advice to which Osterhaus contributed as a member of SAGE (Strategic Advisory Group of Experts). A member of that same ESWI, Marco Goeijenbier, is now being deployed by all major Dutch media as an expert to sell the alleged hantavirus outbreak to the public through television programs like "Eva". - Marco Goeijenbier - Diederik Gommers And through Goeijenbier, we arrive at another name from the corona period: OMT member Diederik Gommers. Gommers held a patent on a type of ventilator; the Dutch government purchased €100 million worth of this type during the corona period. Gommers is also connected to Erasmus MC, as is Goeijenbier (a descendant of the Gommers family). And then we haven’t even mentioned Marion Koopmans yet. She too was head of the Virology department at Erasmus MC until 2025. We know Marion well from the Fauci affair and the spun narrative around the Wuhan lab — a story intended solely to keep the infection lie alive so the public would not discover that infections are a fairy tale. By dragging the public into a discussion about whether it was a lab virus or came from bats, the basic lie is perpetually maintained: that contagion theory is a fairy tale and that pandemics served only as an alibi to inject people with programmable substances. Marion Koopmans, Ab Osterhaus, Diederik Gommers, and Marco Goeijenbier must therefore know Martje Fentener van Vlissingen very well. The Fentener van Vlissingen link to Oceanwide Expeditions and the alleged hantavirus outbreak therefore suddenly raises questions. Source: ➡️ martinvrijland.nl/nieuws-analyse…
@Glenn_Diesen - Glenn Diesen
Larry Johnson: Iran War Creates a New Middle East https://youtu.be/ZuVeSI4FnEA https://t.co/I9UApbWjW4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Glenn: Welcome back. We’re joined again by Larry Johnson, former CI analyst and writer at Sonar Twenty One. Where do things stand in the Iran war and the information war surrounding it?
Larry: The Gulf is too wide for a negotiated settlement. Iran has positions of principle: sanctions lifted immediately and assets unfrozen; recognition that they control the Strait of Hormuz; attacks on Palestinians, Lebanon, and Hezbollah must stop. They won’t back off from enriching nuclear material within limits; they insist on being treated as a sovereign state and as a signatory to the NPT. The U.S. portrayal of Iran as a vicious terrorist state is, in his view, widely believed in the West, and Washington thinks continued pressure will force surrender. He argues the leadership in Iran is not as split as some claim; figures like Pozeskin and Arakchi and Golubov are IRGC-associated, contrary to “moderates” narratives.
On the economy, the U.S. pretends Iran is blockaded, but Iran has opened land routes through Caspian Sea access, Pakistan (seven routes now into Iran), and connections to Russia; the largest deepwater port in Pakistan supports Iranian trade. China and Russia are quietly reshaping Gulf security dynamics. After Arakashi met Putin in Saint Petersburg, Putin spoke of the Gulf security architecture; Wang Yi echoed the theme with Oraqi. Project Freedom was ended after Saudis told the U.S. not to use their territory or base for it. A Pakistani ISI general told Glenn that Saudi Arabia and Qatar may cut ties with the U.S. militarily, or push the U.S. out of the region. If true, this aligns with China and Russia’s push to restructure the Gulf security framework, reducing U.S. military footprint. Iran’s ability to retaliate has so far been limited as China, Russia, and Pakistan counsel restraint.
Glenn: The nonproliferation treaty is central here. Iran is a signatory and seeks its civilian nuclear program within limits; the U.S. demands no civilian program. The treaty’s articles and U.S. behavior are contentious, and the discussion underscores broader questions about security architecture in the region and whether Iran can be included in a new, inclusive security order.
Larry: Regarding current fighting, it’s a tit-for-tat dynamic. Iran retains control of the Strait of Hormuz; U.S. ships are claimed to be active but in practice may avoid direct engagement in the gulf. Iran has supposedly neutralized several U.S. bases and radar systems; the Fifth Fleet HQ in Bahrain is reportedly out of action, and Al Udeid’s operations center may have shifted. The possibility of returning personnel remains doubtful, given the extent of damage and the host nations’ willingness to rebuild with China/Russia in the mix. The UAE’s stance stands out: they blocked flights supporting Project Freedom for a time, then re-opened under restrictions, signaling a shift toward diversifying security partners beyond the U.S. They face pressures related to strategic position and possible leverage by Iran.
On oil and markets, Glenn notes that strategic reserves releases are perceived as signaling decisiveness but may fail to stabilize prices once reserves run dry. Larry explains that a supply shock, not just demand, drives price increases; with reserves exhausted, prices will rise unless demand collapses, which would be a sign of broader economic distress. He contends that Iran’s leverage is growing as Gulf states move away from U.S. protection and toward China/Russia, potentially seeking alternative security arrangements and currencies beyond the petrodollar.
The war’s domestic branding in the U.S. is another theme. Trump declared victory after 60 days, then launched “Epic Fury,” later signaling “Project Freedom.” Larry suggests this is a rebranding to justify further U.S. intervention and to replenish defense-industrial stockpiles, rather than a substantive strategic settlement. The broader goal is to secure new round of allocations for weapons manufacturers, regardless of Iran’s position.
Larry concludes that the move toward a more inclusive regional security architecture—recognizing security interests of opponents and reducing exclusive reliance on the U.S.—appears unlikely in current discourse, even as China and Russia push for such restructuring. Hormuz remains central to Iran’s strategic security, and without meaningful diplomacy, the region’s stability will continue to be threatened. Glenn signs off, thanking Larry for the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. We are joined today again by Larry Johnson, a former CI analyst and the writer at Sonar twenty one, and I, have left a link in the description. So it's great to see you again, Larry.
Speaker 1: Hey. Always good to talk to you in person. I watch you all the time anyway, so keep tabs on you.
Speaker 0: Well, I I wanted to ask where we currently are now in this in the Iran war because the information war is kinda thick. It may makes it very difficult to follow the situation. But from where I'm sitting, the negotiation seems now to have been quite evidently a fraud, often nonexistent. The ceasefire has been repeatedly violated. The fighting has now returned over the past forty eight hours in a big way.
Iran looks like it will retaliate, and, predictably, The US will scream unprovoked. So where where do you see all of this heading, or what what is actually happening now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. The The Gulf The Gulf is too wide for a negotiated settlement. And it's not so much that Iran is not willing to have good faith negotiations, but Iran has some established positions that they're not going the these are positions of principle. These are not issues where sort of they they'd like to have it, but it's not essential.
Example, they they want the sanctions lifted immediately. They want their assets unfrozen. They want the recognition that they do control the state of Hormuz, and they're not gonna give that up. And that the the attacks, the Israeli attacks on the Palestinians, the Lebanese, and Hezbollah must stop. And they're not gonna back off from that.
Well, I don't see any inclination on the part of anyone in the Trump team to acquiesce to any of those. They, you know, they're trying to make it all about the nukes. That's the other thing that Iran is now inflexible on. They're not they're not gonna give up their ability to enrich nuclear material. They'll do it within limits, but they're not gonna be dictated to.
They are a sovereign country, and they are a signatory to the nonproliferation treaty, the NPT. So they're gonna be treated like any other country. That's what that's sort of what they insist on. Now, from The US standpoint, they constantly portray Iran as this vicious terrorist country that is, you know, hanging homosexuals every day from cranes, that is beating women up in the streets if they don't have their hair covered. All of this is lies, but they the the West really believes that.
And on top of it, they believe that the economy is in such terrible shape in Iran that if they just can if The United States just continues to apply this pressure, Iran's gonna be forced to surrender. They they'll have no out. And on top of it, the leadership is in complete disarray. They they're at odds. The IRGC's, the hardliners, and Pozeskin and Arakshi are supposedly the moderates.
Yeah. This is all crap. Nobody apparently, nobody in Washington has taken time to actually do the basic research to discover that, hey, Pozeskin fought with the IRGC or he was a medic for the IRGC during the war with Iraq. And Araki, he was in the IRGC as was Golubov. So oh oh, and the Ayatollah.
So they're all in the IRGC. So come on. Don't give me this, oh, they're really at odds with each other. That's that's just ridiculous. Then on on the economic front, the The United States pretends, oh, boy, we got we got the straight blockaded along with you know, Iran has a blockade, and we got a blockade, and then nothing Iranian is gonna get out.
And then you look up north, Caspian Sea open to Russia, Tashkent quite open, Pakistan has now opened. They said the other day six, now it's seven. They've opened seven land transportation routes into Iran to support Iran. And the the largest, I guess, the biggest deepwater port in the world that's there in Pakistan is now also receiving Iranian ships and goods. Now here's what's really interesting that's going on.
China and Russia are doing something behind the scenes. We don't have full full visibility to it yet, but when Arakashi was in Saint Petersburg with Putin a week ago Monday, Putin used the word, talked about the security architecture of The Gulf. Then with Wang Yi, Oraxis meeting with him two days ago, Same word out of the Chinese mouth. They'll talk about the security architecture in The Gulf. Then we saw the end of Project Freedom as a result of Saudis telling The United States, no, you're not gonna use our territory or Prince Saud Air Base for that.
Reportedly, the Kuwaitis did the same. Now, I confirmed that in fact the Saudis did pull the plug on The US conducting those operations. What I did learn today from a senior general in the Pakistani ISI that he told a friend of mine that Saudi Arabia and and Qatar are both going to cut ties with The United States or at least get The United States out of there as in terms of a military presence. If that is true, if that comes to pass, that is I think what this both China and Russia are talking about with restructuring the security architecture. In other words, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in particular, but also Bahrain, Kuwait, would no longer be reliant on The United States having a military presence there to, quote, protect them and extort them because that's really what's been going on.
It's been a form of extortion. That instead, they'll be brought into a more, let's call it, cooperative, collaborative relationship with China and Russia. They've already seen that The US air defense systems that were promised to protect them were were terrible. They didn't do it. But Russia has combat proven effective air defense systems that these countries might be interested in.
But neither China or Russia are gonna force these countries to buy Chinese bonds or to be, basically economically blackmailed. So that's what's going on behind the scenes right now. I think that in part explains why we've not seen a broader military retaliation by Iran so far because what what China and Russia are doing with with the Saudis, with Qataris, and with Oman. I'm not sure UAE may be, you know, unsavable. They may have gone beyond the bonds.
But in in any event, until that security architecture is in place, I think The United States is going to renew the attack on Iran. It appears that they're just gonna they're gonna wait until after Trump's trip to China if that comes off.
Speaker 0: What you said about the nonproliferation treaty, it's very important, Rob, because I don't think everyone is quite familiar with it that the the reason why it's against international law to acquire nuclear weapons for a non nuclear weapon state is because they have signed under the nonproliferation treaty. But by committing to not acquiring nuclear weapons, by signing this treaty, they also have the guaranteed right to have nuke a civilian nuclear nuclear program. But the The US is quite explicit now, though. They don't want Iran to even have a civilian one. But so in this regard, it's The United States that's in breach of the nonproliferation treaty.
That being said, the nonproliferation treaty of both article one and two is about not stationing nuclear weapons in non nuclear weapon states. So NATO already breached this Yeah. A long a long time ago. But putting this aside, I I I also thought what you were saying about this new chatter for coming out of Russia and China about a security architecture for The Middle East. This also seems quite important because this is also the case when you when you hear talks about the the the the proxy war in Ukraine.
The keyword there is also a new security architecture because, you know, it makes sense in the after the Cold War and the hegemonic era or unipolar era. If you're gonna have a system based on global primacy, a hegemonic system will be dependent on dividing regions into, you know, allies and adversaries, one being dependent, the other one being balanced. But but but but overall, this hegemonic system, this is essentially what set us up for all of these wars in Mhmm. The Middle East. You know?
How can it be that Iran is completely excluded from security arrangements? Security arrangements are essentially a line system against Iran. But if you can't include Iran, which is the largest country in population and territory there, you know, if you don't look further east, How how is it supposed to be stable and provide peace? But but we don't pretend to, and it's the same in Europe. We organized Europe under the EU and NATO, where everyone is supposed to be part of it except for the largest country in Europe in terms of territory, population, economy, and military.
It just makes sense that this is an a block system, which pushes the zero sum security. So as the more unipolar era comes to an end, it makes sense that peace will now require a more inclusive security architecture, which recognizes also security interest of opponents. But I don't see this in a discourse, though, and I think this is the problem. And much like, you know, refusing any diplomacy with the Russians, they will the security architecture they see is, well, if they can't get a deal, then they will take the territories, which they need to be safe. And same with the Iranians.
If they can't get the peace they want through diplomacy, they'll take Hormuz, as you suggested. If they control Hormuz, they can pressure the Gulf states into abandoning the American bases, abandoning the petrodollar. They can achieve a lot of these goals. But if we will sit down at the table and address their actual actual actual security, there might be a common meeting ground, but that doesn't appear to happen. But more specifically, though, where do you see the fighting happening now?
Because I was looking at some reports mostly on Telegram, but, essentially, it's explosions in Iran, UAE. I hear hits on American warships. Again, I'm not sure what is confirmed and what's not confirmed at this point in time.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So at this point, it's a it's a little bit of tit for tat. Iran retains control over the Strait Of Hormuz. While The US keeps claiming that its ships are sailing up, you know, sailing back and forth, I I I I I don't conceive of an admiral being that stupid as to try to put a destroyer into the Persian Gulf itself because then it can get bottled up, and it has nowhere to go, which is, you know, that's like, Iran allowing. Yeah.
Well, hey. We'll let you pass. Once you pass, boom. You're you're you're in a locked room, essentially. So, again, I think Iran has been counseled by Russia and China and through Pakistan to just, you know, try try not to respond yet because because their Iran achieved a de facto elimination of The United States from the region by attacking those various bases, the 15 bases.
And in most of them, The US has had to withdraw its personnel. And and and several of them, the key radars that function have been destroyed. Excuse me. So that doesn't work. When we're talking about security architecture, So the security the old architecture was the presence of these US bases.
We got US bases there. We're the tripwire that if you're attacked, we got your back. But it also came with conditions. While we're here, why don't you buy some of our weapons? And, hey, we got some t bills.
You need to buy some t bills. So all of a sudden, all these countries, you know, they they're up through their eyeballs and buying up US debt, and they're having to buy US weapon systems because that's, you know, that's part of the security architecture there. Now that's that's break that has broken apart. The The Gulf countries are starting to sell off their t bills. They're not they're not lining up to buy more.
They're selling them off. They're moving into gold and silver. The the more I've delved into the sort of the economic foundation of the of the Persian Gulf, the the two critical countries are Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Because when when you go through the numbers, the and I've got updated numbers for the who produces what. So 32% of the world's oil comes out of the Middle East, Persian Gulf region.
32%. So and that that means Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, UAE, Kuwait. The LNG, 20% of the world's LNG comes out of there, and that's mainly Qatar. So Qatar plays an important role. On the urea front for fertilizer, 36%.
On sulfur, which goes it helps produce phosphate fertilizer. It does meat or metal or processing. It does petroleum refining and also cleaning of semiconductor wafers for computers. 44% of that comes out of there and Kotter is a big supplier of that. Helium to 33%.
Again, Qatar. It is the second largest producer of helium in the world after The United States. So when when you put all this together, what whatever the Saudis and Qataris decide to do, it's going to have a major international economic impact. In fact, that's one of the things that we still haven't come fully to grips with, how bad the damage is from we're now in day 70 of this war and the and the the these resources have been cut off. I described it like, imagine you've got a you've got a water tank and then this water tank goes out and is connected to the watering troughs for livestock.
So, you know, the faucet's turned on. It's constantly running, keeping the levels up. The water drains out through a pipe down lower in the tank. And the cows and bulls and horses and sheep, they come up and drink. All of a sudden, that faucet gets turned off.
There's still water in the tank, but as that water falls, you know, the the animals are still able to drink, but it keeps falling and falling until the point where there's no more water coming out. And all of a sudden, that the those that livestock that needed the drink, they're not getting a drink anymore. That's where we are right now with what's happened with oil. When on the seventy eighth, when they turned off the faucet in in the in the Persian Gulf, the oil was still in in tankers. They're moving out across the ocean.
But now those tankers have been emptied. And we're just like in this example where the water tank that was full, then three quarters full, then half full, a quarter, It's now empty. And once that's empty, all of a sudden, gotta come up with some alternatives or there may not be alternatives. So the economic impact that's gonna strike the world out of this is I don't think anybody's really sat down and put, you know, pencil to paper to to figure the math out on it, but it's gonna be bad.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've I've also been a bit confused over some of the news reports. For example, when The US and other countries begin to dig in to the strategic reserves, start to release the strategic reserves of some oil, somehow this shows decisiveness. It's putting more oil in the market, so suddenly the prices drop. Yeah.
I would think it should have the opposite effect. That is once you dig into the strategic reserves, if there's no plan b, essentially what happens when those are over, you know, there should be lack of confidence. I mean, the way, in my opinion, strategic reserves should work is well, for example, what you see in China. They have a lot of storage space. When the prices are very high, then they then they tap into the strategic reserves.
So they essentially put a ceiling on the prices because it can't go further up. If you go this far, then we're gonna go into our strategic reserve. Okay. This is where the price stops. When it drops low, that's when they refill the the a lot of these reserves.
But, essentially, there's a plan, and this is a way of stabilizing the prices. But just digging into strategic reserves, when there's no political solution as you know, to use your analogy, there's no plans to turn on the faucet again, you know, this should be all red flags going up instead. Yeah. We see the markets coming. I mean but, again, I'm not sure how many times Trump has said now that, oh, well, the war is pretty much coming to an end.
It's over. The Iranians are talking. They're desperate for a deal. He's playing the same nonsense made up, you know, arguments the whole time, he's able still to talk down the markets even when the Iranians, you know, rebuttal and say, well, this is just nonsense. We're not even talking to the Americans.
Or what deal is he talking about? And still, Trump is able to talk down well, to talk up the markets and talk down the oil prices. It's deceptive, but kind of impressive at the same time, I think.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, you know, the the college economic classes I took, you know, and I did I did work on a PhD field in international economics since I got a little past basic economics. But the idea was that these markets play fair and essentially that if you've got a large supply of something and the demand for it is fixed, then the price of it's gonna fall as that supply increases. And so it's a dynamic interaction between supply and demand. And so what we're looking at though right now is we got a dramatic fall in supply. We've got at least steady demand and now that demand has started to fall because of this fall in the supply like Lufthansa, the German airline.
They've canceled 20,000 flights. Why? Well, they can't guarantee that they're gonna have the fuel to do it. So they're reacting to that supply. But the bottom line with all of this is the reduced supply means all these prices should be higher.
And as you pointed out, many countries in US and Japan in particular tried to mitigate the price rise that should have happened by flooding the market with oil reserves, but now they're out. So that's why I say we're now the the next phase of this where the price is gonna continue to increase and increase higher dramatically simply because there are no more reserves to dampen it down. The only the only thing that would potentially help drop like the price of oil is if the demand crashed. But if the demand crashes, that's that's a bad sign. That means some very, very bad things are going on in your economy, not good things.
So this all of this this economic drama that's there as a will that will hit has been largely excluded from the analysis about what's going on with Iran. And in in fact, it's it's fueled this is one of the problems with Trump and his team. They have been told I don't know if it was the foundation for the defense of democracy, the FDD, or if it was the CIA. Maybe a combination of those two have convinced Donald Trump, Scott Bessent, Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth that Iran is in such desperate economic shape that if we continue this pressure, this economic pressure, you know, we don't let them, they have to store all this oil in tanks, and then they're not gonna be able to pump anymore out of the ground and their oil pumping system will collapse, that the soldiers aren't getting paid, they have no money. So it's a desperate situation.
They really believe all this crap. And ignoring the fact that Pakistan's got seven lines, seven transportation routes open into Iran. Turkmenistan is, you know, that's where the railroad from China passes through that's bringing goods in and out of Iran. And then Iran's access to Russia through the Caspian Sea. So in fact, if anything, the Iranian economy right now is doing better than it did a year ago simply because the price of oil has quadrupled compared to what they were getting paid.
And I'm talking and when I say quadrupled, the the the actual price that people are paying for the oil as it comes off the ship, $150,160 dollars. Ignore what it says on oil futures markets. This is those things are completely manipulated now, I am convinced. So this is Iran's actually in a better situation. But but the West still believes, oh my god, we just all we gotta do is hang on, keep pushing because they're gonna crack any minute now.
And and connected to that is this belief that there's a great split in the leadership. And, know, nobody again, the media will not allow anybody to come on the corporate media to explain the alternative that the narrative that the Iranians are at odds and at each other's throat is just not true.
Speaker 0: Yeah. No. It's no. I think that is quite, yeah, conclusively been disproven. But when we look at how this war will affect the the wider region, that is the Gulf States, for example, accommodating the The US bases.
Again, this is one this seems like one of the key objectives, as mentioned before, of Iran's holding on to the Strait Of Hormuz. That is simply if they can put up a toll, it's, yes, nice to get reparations. But if they can, as they already suggested, have a higher toll on countries that put sanctions on Iran or that threatens Iran by hosting US bases, suddenly, you're high you will have very strong systemic incentives for for countries to begin to adjust in a way which benefits Iranian security. So, you know, if I was an adviser to Iranian government, I would say by the, you know, by the love of God, if you want security, both, you know, economic and military, don't give up on the Strait Of Hormuz. Whatever security architecture you think you're gonna be able to negotiate with Americans, they will not give it to you.
You mean Right. The Strait Of Hormuz is what what you need. But but we but I guess the the the willingness of the Gulf States to to align or fall in line, if you will, with what the Iranians want doesn't only depend on this. It also, I guess, depend on the extent to which the Americans can provide security, but also what has actually happened with the bases. I think this is important as well because, you know, Trump made plenty of statements that there's you know, maybe one or two missiles got through.
But I saw in the Wall Street Journal, I think it was one or two days ago, it had a report where, you know, there there has been extensive damage to The US bases in the region well below what has been reported before. That is in the media. If you people listen to you and me talk, they would have known that this was fake, that the destruction was much, much greater. But how how extensive exactly is it at this point? Because I thought it was interesting, you know, Wall Street Journal begins to accept reality, though.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I I think it was pretty extensive. The one that didn't really get hit much is Aldophra in UAE. That that is that will be one of the first to go if the if the conflict re reengages at full full force.
But we know that billion dollar, at least two radar systems that cost a billion dollars plus a piece were destroyed. And that destruction led to basically, and then for a couple of days anyway, blinding Israel and US forces in Jordan from being able to see new missile launches coming out of Iran. So they compensated for that by bringing in the AWACS. So AWACS became these airborne radar platforms that were trying to help identify where potential missile threats were coming from. But the point is Fifth Fleet headquarters in in Bahrain, it's it's dead.
They're they're not going back there. The combined air operations center in Al Udeid, I think that they've closed down that shop. I don't know where they moved to. So the the reality of will they be bringing US personnel back to those bases is is questionable. That's where it looks like in in the damage done in some of the areas is so extensive that it it, you know, makes it too costly for The United States necessarily to wanna come back in, or they try to shift the cost to the host nation to rebuild it.
And that's where, according to this Pakistani general who's part of ISI, the intelligence service, both Saudi Arabia and Qatar realizing the time to cut ties with The United States over this whole issue has come.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, that was another thing. The we saw the Saudis and others. I forgot whom. They cut, as you said before, the the access to the airspace for a while.
But that that that appeared to last for, like, twenty four hours or forty eight before they began to loosen up again. Do we know anything about exactly what happened there? Because, obviously, they are getting a bit anxious about The US presence. Or or was it that The US was essentially agreeing to to a ceasefire and not retaliate against Iranians. It is unclear to me why why they agreed to this and also why they walked away from it so shortly thereafter.
Speaker 1: All I can all I know that I could confirm was when I when I heard the NBC report, and the essence of that was that Saudi Arabia, they had blocked further flights in support of Project Freedom, and that Trump had got on the phone with Mohammed bin Salman pressing him to reverse himself, and he said no. I was able to confirm that all of that was true because people who were involved on the US military side of the house planning their operations, etcetera, they were scrambling around trying to figure out alternatives on that day. So it did happen. I have not yet confirmed that the base fully reopened. And if it did, I I suspect it probably reopened under some restrictions that the Saudis have imposed.
Because, again, they are they're talking to the Chinese. They're talking to the the Pakistanis. They're talking to the Russians. You know? And I I think they're they're recognized.
They they gotta have some other options here because The United States is not as powerful as it once seemed to be. And remember, they promised, oh, yeah. We got your back. We'll protect you. Here's these Patriot missiles.
They didn't work. They failed.
Speaker 0: Well, that's again, going back to when you see the wider changes in the international system. If you wanna see gradually where countries have to shift, it's they're gonna have to start to diversify their security partners. So you can't only look to one actor. I mean, The US will remain an important if they'll if not the most important security actor in the international system, but it's not possible to solely link the security to The US. And, again, another thing, as I began saying, was I think they also have to shift away from the alliance systems again to also pursue more inclusive security arrangements where Yeah.
Instead of sick seeking security against nonmembers, they have to have security with other members, which would then be adversaries that, you know, security architecture is only not only with the people you agree with, but also your opponents. But of all the Gulf states, though, how do you make sense of The United Arab Emirates? Because they they they tend to stand out. I mean, if you look at the Saudis, Qataris, well, especially Oman, who are is more accommodating to Iran, You see The United Arab Emirates, they seem prepared to go all the way and against Iran that is. And they also seem to bear the brunt of, well, let's call it Iran's fury when they retaliate.
Speaker 1: Yeah. This is I I I liken it to going back to World War two. And let's let's say it's August 1944. So The United States and the Brits and Canadians have retaken Paris. The general running the Italian operation, they've entered Rome.
And so Spain says, hey, I think this is a good time for me to join with the Nazi axis. So you're signing up with Germany and Italy at the time when they are in retreat. And that's exactly what UAE is doing right now that it's not Iran it's not Israel that's so powerful or The United States that's so powerful. They just demonstrated with all of their might and power, they've been unable to defeat Iran. And so UAE is now going to go toe to toe with Iran.
It is it may I think it's in part just a a sense of their economic desperation, the growing concern there. But I I think there's also some blackmail factors with the whole Epstein file because there were there were people in prominent prominent Emiratis that were implicated in in those files and doing all sorts of sordid activities. But it is certainly curious because they were the one Gulf state outside of Oman, but Oman was never being punished the way that Kuwait and Bahrain, Saudis, and Qataris were. But the there they had UAE had the Port Of Farooja that gave them an access to the Gulf Of Oman so that they could get a million barrels of oil out a day perhaps. But that that's now come to an end.
So they picked the fight that they're not gonna be very pleased with.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Now, well, Bahrain makes sense. I mean, they're hosting America's fifth fleet. They have this Shia majority, which is being oppressed. I mean, you can see why Iran would go there, but it's, yeah, The United Arab Emirates store is an interesting case, also in terms of their motivations, exactly what strategy they're pursuing because it seems as if, yeah, they're they're gambling a lot on the position they've taken.
I I just wanted to also ask about what's happening because within The United States because it's not just the, you know, the different states competing against each other. But within The US, we see Trump seems to be in a difficult spot. War is not popular with the public, but it's also a good opportunity for the political opposition in The US to go after him. I mean, if the it would have been a success against Iran, you know, they would have celebrated on the streets. But when it goes bad, it's an opportunity to go after Trump, it appears.
But more specifically, what does actually Trump what is his main problem now domestically? I heard that the congress now has to approve the war. Is this why he keeps calling the war a skirmish or, you know, scuffle or whatever words he's using now?
Speaker 1: Well, no. He declared so under the War Powers Act, you had sixty days and then congress had to act to say, okay. You can keep going or you gotta bring him home. Well, he declared victory. Hey.
The war is over on on day 60. Epic Fury, we won. It's over. It's a great victory. And then on Monday, he announced the following Monday, he then announced Project Freedom.
This is entirely new. This has nothing to do with Epic Fury. Then that lasted for about thirty six hours. So I I think the plan now is to provoke an attack by Iran by using the Strait Of Hormuz. So even though Iran is engaged in self defense as it sees it, it will be sold to the American public as this was a illegal act of piracy on the part of Iran and they've attacked us.
And so we got to retaliate. We've been attacked now. Let's call this instead of Gulf Of Tonkin, this is Gulf Of Persian too. This is like Gulf Of Tonkin. They will stage something to justify ramping up an attack on autorun as if Iran was the violator and the one that caused this.
And so that that then starts a new sixty day clock because that'll be a new war.
Speaker 0: That's interesting. It's if it's only about branding, essentially. But yeah. No. It's I well, I can I can imagine that it it would work, though?
I mean, it's it's harder to sell it as something completely different. But that's that would make sense, though, to assess the statements of Marco Rubio because he made a comment that operation or, you know, operation epic fury is concluded. You know, we had victory. We achieved all our objectives. And then Trump announces the start of operation freedom.
And so it could just be a rebranding in order to get around the legal
Speaker 1: That's hurdle, I exactly what it is. That's a good way to describe it because the fundamental issues haven't been settled. The US, whatever the objectives were, there were no objectives relevant to Iran's military position or economic position. If I've said in a sarcastic way that one of The US objectives was to further deplete its stock of critical weapons so that they would be able to justify going back to congress asking for more billions of dollars to flood that money into the corporations, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, that that would make these weapons. Very cynical approach.
Speaker 0: Now yeah. As I said in the beginning, when Iran retaliates, I think, is quite predictable. The keywords unprovoked will emerge in which Iran has, for no good reason, attacked. So I guess this is coming next. Yeah.
Well, my last question was just about, yeah, China and Russia, which you referred to before. What do you see being, I guess, their involvement now that, I guess, we're going to a new rebranded Iran war? Because I would assume that they both have an interest in one hand of expelling The US from the region. And if they can drain some of their weaponry inventory, then, of course, that would make sense too. On the other hand, it seems like the overarching objective for both the Chinese and the Russians will be to put an end to this war because this is extremely destabilizing.
Speaker 1: Well, it's actually I would argue for Russia, it's been actually pretty beneficial. Their revenues oil revenues are way up. So they they benefited from that. But I I think Putin does recognize this is bad and could because it's going to destabilize not just Europe and the West, but it's gonna destabilize some countries in the global South by virtue of the shortage of fuel and food for starters. So they wanna get an end to it.
And that's where I think they are now working energetically behind the scenes with Iran, with the Gulf Arabs, particularly with the Saudis and with the Qataris to get an end to this, to get the get the commodity markets open and flowing to get out of the Persian Gulf. But at the same time, they're gonna support Iran's demand that it the it the sanctions be lifted. And that that brings us back to when Trump meets Xi in Beijing later this week, that one of his demands will be, you gotta stop the sanction routine. You lift the sanctions on us, Lift the sanctions on Russia. But Iran said, hey, you're lift the sanctions on us right away because it was when they signed the JCPOA, they they the Rodins really thought that they would get some immediate sanction relief, and it never came because The United States got rid of Great Britain and kept finding ways to drag their feet and just not fulfill the obligations.
So that that's I think that's one of the long game planes plays here to basically make it impossible for The United States going forward to impose sanctions that would hurt any of those countries economically.
Speaker 0: Well, that's an old game in diplomacy, though. If you don't think the other side will abide by agreements, you wanna break it into many smaller games. And I think if you see from the Iranian perspective at every turn, they never got what they wanted in the negotiations. As I said, the JCPOA, not only did the The US walk away from it in the lateral, but even when it was enforced, only Iranians abided by it. They accepted this intrusive inspections by the IAEA, and yet they never got the other side to fulfill their side of the agreement.
And, of course, now you had more reasons why they shouldn't trust negotiations. I think, again, without any trust in diplomacy, they will, I think, look for the the hard option in terms of ensuring their security. So that's bad news. That means the Strait Of Hormuz is in Iranian control. I mean, bad news for The US, I guess, political West, maybe good.
It's a good news for Iran.
Speaker 1: Wasn't it Golibov the other day that said, hey. The trust me, bro phase of US negotiations is over now? I love that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. He tweeted that out. The trust the trust me, bro face. Yeah. It feels like they have the finger on the pulse of their audiences.
But, no. It's very deceptive. And I think they can only play this game so many times in terms of arguing that, yeah, trust me. The Iranians are you know, they're exhausted. They're divided.
They're begging for a deal. And, yeah, it's
Speaker 1: Anything but. Anything but.
Speaker 0: Well, Larry, it's always a great pleasure. So thank you very much, my friend, and have a great day.
Speaker 1: Alright, Glenn. Hey. Take care. Bye bye.
@EleanorAquitai5 - G.Flamma
@laralogan She is a liar, a fraud, and betrayed her oath and the public trust. She was convicted and needs punishment, but not the harsh sentence she received.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY CRAP! UK PM Keir Starmer has LOST over 1,303 Council seats His Labour Party has lost WALES for the first time in 100 years Nigel Farage's Reform SURGED over +1,400 seats! 🤯 THE PEOPLE ARE FURIOUS! Take your country back! 🇺🇸🇬🇧 https://t.co/8JIykhWKyz
@HealthRanger - HealthRanger
My full investigation and video report into Pumpernickel bread, the historic SUPERFOOD that gave rise to a civilization! https://t.co/FtWLQVhL7H
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines the history and science of Westphalian pumpernickel rye bread, a fifteenth-century “shadow food” that became a superfood and foundational to populations in what would become northern Germany. The baker described a legendary origin in the town of Zost (S O E S T), where during a siege a baker bricked up his oven to defend the town. He returned to find a low-temperature, long-steam bake that had been running for about 24 hours. The result was a dense, fragrant, completely dark loaf, dense and richer in flavor, sometimes described as having hints of chocolate or coffee. Over time, bakers discovered that simple rye dough—just rye, water, and some bacteria, without rising yeast—subjected to a long, steam-filled bake produced this unique loaf later known as Westphalia pumpernickel rye bread.
The bread’s notable advantages included its shelf stability: it could last about six months on the shelf without spoiling, unlike many other breads that mold quickly. Its flavor remained exotic yet appealing, and its lack of added sugar, yeast, or salt contributed to its mold resistance. Nutritionally, the bread offered two to three times the bioavailability of minerals such as zinc, iron, magnesium, and other trace minerals compared with wheat breads. This enhanced mineral absorption was partly due to rye’s enzymatic activity, including phytase, which breaks down phytic acid (phytate) that otherwise chelates minerals and reduces their bioavailability. The long fermentation and extended baking degraded roughly 90% of phytic acid in rye, increasing mineral absorption when consumed.
The bread’s microbiology centered on a community of lactic acid bacteria (LAB), with Lactobacillus strains such as Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactococcus sanfranciscensis (often associated with sourdough bacteria) playing key roles. These bacteria produced lactic acid and acetic acid, lowering the loaf’s pH (to around 4.5 or so), which inhibited mold and bacteria. Additional antimicrobial compounds included hydrogen peroxide, ethanol, carbon dioxide, and bacteriocins (BLIS), as well as phenolic acids and diacetyl, all contributing to mold inhibition and flavor development. The combination of low water activity in the dense loaf, steam-kilned pasteurization-like effects from long baking, and careful sealing ensured the bread’s longevity. Enzymes such as phytase remained active during the slow bake, enabling continued breakdown of phytic acid and enhancing mineral availability.
The result was a bread that could sustain populations during famines and sieges, serve as reliable nourishment for soldiers and sailors (the bread described as “iron rations” in German military history), and even accompany modern spaceflight, as an astronaut reportedly brought Westphalian pumpernickel to orbit. The bread’s importance extended into cultural heritage: there is a Westphalian Pumpernickel Protective Association (founded 2010) documenting thousands of varieties, and UNESCO’s German Commission recognized it as cultural heritage in 2014. The narrative frames pumpernickel as a multidisciplinary achievement—agriculture, microbiology, chemistry, nutrition, and food history—demonstrating a centuries-long, labor-intensive craft that produced a durable, nutritious, and flavorful staple.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've probably heard me talk about shadow food. But today, we're gonna dive into a really intriguing piece of history about ancient superfood. Well, maybe the word ancient isn't quite accurate. We're talking, well, fifteenth century. Right?
So hundreds of years ago, there was a superfood that was developed in what later became Germany. And it's called pumpernickel bread or rye bread. It was also called the black loaf of Westphalia because of course, it had its origins in that region of what later became Northern Germany or or parts of Northern Germany. But most people don't know the miracle of pumpernickel rye bread. And that's what I wanna share with you today.
Now, personally, I've never been a fan of the taste of pumpernickel rye bread. But after doing this research, I have ordered some and I can't wait to taste it now with a new understanding of what it is and why it's a superfood upon which a very large portion of civilization, of Western European civilization, was built on this bread because of its unique properties that were almost discovered by accident and that turn it into a super food that actually supported population growth for centuries and gave rise to modern Germany. It's really that big of a deal. And it's nothing like the, you know, the spongy wheat garbage that we call bread today with high fructose corn syrup in it and mostly air. And, you know, it it it doesn't even fill you up.
You eat a slice. It's like nothing. It's just you know, it's like processed garbage, carbohydrates, etcetera. So today, we have shadow food. What they developed in fifteenth century was superfood.
So let me explain how this all begins. First of all, rye, it's a robust crop. It can grow in very poor soils. It can handle much colder temperatures. It avoids rot.
You know, it's it germinates even in cold temperatures. So rye was considered a weed for centuries and it was a weed that was plaguing the wheat crops of the region. And the farmers there would try to pull out all the rye as much as they could in order to grow their wheat. But wheat crops were failing, especially all over Northern Europe in the fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth centuries. There were some changes in climate and temperature, rainfall, etcetera.
And the soils were were horrible. Sometimes they were heavy clay. Sometimes they were heavy in sand. Very infertile ground. Right?
Sometimes drought impacted fields. And you can imagine this is also relevant today in many areas, by the way. But where wheat cannot grow, rye often thrives. And, you know, it was known in the in the Roman Empire, and it was used in some ways in the Roman Empire, and it was even cultivated by the late Roman Empire. But it wasn't really appreciated until this creation of the Westphalia pumpernickel rye bread, which takes that rye and does something really miraculous with it that even the people of the time didn't quite understand, but but you will.
You'll understand it here today. So there's a town that is believed to be the origin of this bread. It's called Zost, or it's spelled S O E S T. Zost. And it was involved in a lot of wars.
You know, wars raging across Europe. And in these wars, food supply became really critical. Because some of these wars, of course, destroyed farms and laid siege to the food supply, etcetera. Kind of like the way today our our modern empire, you know, tariffs and blockades and halts oil. Well, back five hundred or more years ago, they would just lay siege to the food supply.
And so food that would last on the shelf for a very long period of time was more than a luxury. It was a it was a strategic asset for the region. And this Zost town, at least this is the way the the story is told. It may or may not be factually correct, but there was one particular war, and then there was a a baker that had to leave his rye bread in his oven and to rush to the city walls to defend the town of Zost. And he didn't want looters to steal his bread so he he bricked up the oven which caused humidity to rise inside the oven almost to the point of creating steam.
And he also, of course, reduced the, you know, the fuel to it. So it was a low temperature, long steam filled bake. And the bread had been baking by the time he returned after fighting to defend the town. The bread had been baking for almost twenty four hours at a lower temperature. And what he found was not a ruined loaf of bread, but rather this really fragrant loaf that was black through and through, not just the crust, but all the way through.
And it was very dense. And it was more tasty. It was sweeter, more of a rich flavor. Some people say it's has hints of of chocolate or hints of coffee in it. And then over time, as he experimented with this then other bakers and other families over many many years worked to experiment with this, they found that this very simple rye dough, which was nothing more than rye and water and some bacteria cultures, not even rising yeast.
You know, they didn't use yeast to to make the bread rise. Okay? It was just rye and water and some bacteria. And if they subjected it to a long, slow, steam filled bake that it changed it into something completely amazing, which we now know as classic Westphalia pumpernickel rye bread. But this bread, there's something about it that we haven't even gotten to that changed history.
Now, many people over the centuries mocked pumpernickel bread. Even it's said that Napoleon claimed that the bread was only good for his horse. Right? And it was mocked for causing gas and and flatulence. And some people think that's where its name even came from.
However, the bread eventually became known as the foundation of the food supply for that portion of European civilization. Why? Because it could last six months on the shelf without spoiling. Whereas other breads would go bad very quickly and of course, mold would grow. So fungal colonies would break out on other breads.
But for rye, that didn't happen for some reason. It's even at the time, they didn't know exactly why. And the taste became known as more exotic. It didn't have any sugar added to it, which also helped to prevent the growth of of mold and and bacteria, etcetera. But didn't have any sugar, didn't have any yeast, it didn't have any salt.
It was something that a farmer could grow and make himself. And it didn't need all these other inputs. Didn't need flour from wheat. And so it was a single source food product that could last for six months on the shelf and that had rather unique flavors. At least it was something different in the diet of the fifteenth century, which was a pretty poor diet, by the way, where people there mostly, they couldn't afford much meat, couldn't afford much in the way of milk or dairy or cheese or anything along those lines.
They had occasional meat, but, you know, not anything like what we have today. Mostly, were malnourished, and that brings us to the other advantage of this bread. This bread gave double or triple the bioavailability of zinc and iron and magnesium and other trace minerals compared to wheat breads. And there's a very specific chemical reason why that's the case, and we're gonna get to that. But the people that lived on this Westphalia pumpernickel rye bread, they actually had better immune function because they had zinc in their diet that was more bioavailable.
And the women in particular were able to replenish the iron that they lost through menstruation. It was able to give them, you know, better strength and stamina because, you know, you don't want to be anemic and iron deficient, especially if you're trying to get pregnant and have a child. And so the iron bioavailability combined with zinc and others, it actually made these populations healthier with better stamina, better energy, and more children, reproduction, larger families. So the populations grew. And as the populations grew, the number of bakeries baking this secret bread recipe, the Westphalia pumpernickel rye, that number also grew.
And the specific bacterial cultures that I'll talk about here in a second were guarded like family secrets because remember, microscope. This was long before anybody really understood microbiology. But they knew that there was something special in this culture, and that if you had the right culture and you worked it just right with the right amount of moisture and the right ratios with the rye, that you would get this end product that was amazing, that would also last on the shelf for six months. So let's let's talk about the microbial basis of this amazing super food that gave rise to much of European civilization. So it's a lot of it's about the lactic acid bacteria, LAB, but but there were others.
There were also some wild yeasts that were part of this mixture, probably just collected out of the air even accidentally because they didn't use yeast to make the bread rise, but they did have this culture. And it primarily consisted of lactic acid bacteria. And there are many of them. This has all been analyzed since then, so we know what it is today. But there's a fructolactobacillus Sanfranciscensis, which sounds like San Francisco, probably where somebody identified this.
Anyway, this is a very famous sourdough bacterium, and this produces lactic acid. And along with the other strains of bacteria, I have some others here listed in my research. Lactobacillus acidophilus, I mean, that's, you know, common, very common. Lactobacillus plantarum. It's an anti fungal organism.
It produces very strong mold inhibiting metabolites. But back to the lactic acid bacteria, it produces lactic acid, which of course lowers the pH of the overall loaf of bread. And lactic acid is used today in a lot of personal care products. You may not know that. But it's used to lower the pH to halt the growth of mold, bacteria, fungi in personal care products.
And it also works in bread. And so if you lower that pH to, I don't know, 4.5 or something like that, then that begins to block a huge percentage of possible fungal strains. It it stops them from ever even getting started. And then when you add to that the mold inhibition metabolites of these other strains, like I said, the Lacta plantabacillus plantarum, then you have another vector of an antifungal capability. And there were others, others that add to the aroma of the bread, others that produce acetic acid, which is the acid that you find in vinegar, for example.
And acetic acid also contributed to the lowering of the pH. And when you combine all of these, they form community of bacteria that transform rye flour into this matrix, this complex aromatic tasty seemingly non bread subs. I mean, it doesn't even resemble bread anymore. It's it's a black loaf. It's like a solid loaf at this point, but it's highly resistant to mold.
Highly resistant. And so when you wrap it properly, and especially after it's baked for sixteen to twenty four hours, and then you wrap it properly, and remember it was baked at low temperature too with steam. So the steam also killed, you know, any mold spores or, you know, anything like that might take root later on. And then you wrap it up. You could put this on a shelf for six months, which means that this became the soldier's bread.
This became the farmer's bread through the harsh winter months of Northern Germany. This became the family bread when you had nothing else left to eat, when all the spring and summer crops had been consumed and you were out of dairy and, you know, you'd already butchered the the lambs or whatever and you had nothing left to eat, you could still count on rye. And yeah, you you you were probably really tired of rye bread after two months of living on rye, but you didn't die. You didn't die. Nutrition.
You had calories. You even had prebiotics that were, you know, part of this naturally because of this rich colony, this community of bacteria that that were feeding on the the natural natural maltose maltose and and the the glucose that's in rye. So they would convert those sugars into lactic acid, acetic acid, and even ethanol, by the way, little bit of ethanol. And this blend, which was controlled through temperature temperature at time and consistency of the dough, which came down to the art of the baker and the knowledge passed down from family to family. This gave them the knowledge of how to produce more acetic acid in the bread, Or they could produce more lactic acid which changed the flavor of the bread.
And the lactic acid would make it taste more like yogurt and the acetic acid would make it taste more like vinegar. But these were craftsmen and women and they knew how to do this and they knew that a particular kind of firmness of the dough or a particular temperature or a particular duration would result in a an end resulting flavor and a shelf life of the bread. And so this bread became what maybe the the Bible referred to as manna from heaven. You know, this was the miraculous bread that fed soldiers and fed families and kept people alive throughout the centuries of, you know, Germany or what became Germany. Of modern course, Germany wasn't founded until, what, the nineteenth century.
But these were Germanic people who who became modern day Germany. And so what's amazing about all of this is that it's a multilayered antibacterial approach that almost seems engineered by modern science. You know, if you were to try to make a bread that had a long shelf life, and this may be very important in the coming, you know, global famine situation we're facing. But if you want a long shelf life without refrigeration, without freezing, they didn't have those in 1450, but they had bacteria. They had the cultures.
And so it was a multivector approach. I already mentioned the lactic acid and the acetic acid. But some of these bacterial strains produced hydrogen peroxide, which had its own antibacterial properties. Some of them produced ethanol. Some produced carbon dioxide.
And then there are other substances that are known as bacteriocin like inhibitory substances, or BLIS. I know. It's an acronym you probably forget. But these are small antimicrobial peptides that are secreted by the lactic acid bacteria that are another different level of defense against bacteria and molds and so on. There were also phenolactic acids that that are antifungal.
There's a propionic acid, diacetyl, a little bit of that in there as well, which is kind of interesting. Basically, it was a chemistry lab in a loaf of bread, and the resulting chemistry just nailed it. It gave it shelf life. It gave it taste. It gave it character, and it gave it nutrition.
And we'll talk about the nutrition in just a moment, but I I wanna mention that the steam oven baking was really critical to make all of this happen. They would bake it from maybe a 100 to a 130 degrees Celsius for at least sixteen hours sometimes up to twenty four hours. Now, you have to fill the oven with steam and you have to close it up so the lid to the oven stays completely closed. So unlike modern day bread which might bake for you know thirty or forty minutes at a much higher temperature, the pumpernickel bake is 30 to 50 times longer basically at half the temperature. This is the longest baking time of any modern bread, I mean, of anything known in the world.
And so, as a result, it doesn't just burn the crust and make it harder and make the crust crack or anything like that. Not that there's anything wrong with that for those other kinds of breads. But the pumpernickel bread undergoes something called the Mallard reaction. I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing that correctly. Mallard reaction normally in breads it only happens on the surface.
It it's something that happens when the crust brown. But in the baking of the pumpernickel bread, this reaction happens very slowly and evenly throughout the entire loaf. And what it means is that the starches of the rye are broken down into sugars by enzymes that are still active at the low baking temperatures. Those enzymes which would be destroyed at higher temperatures. And then those resulting sugars react with proteins that are in rye to produce the colors and the flavors that are unique to pumpernickel bread.
And this is a slow process. You can't rush it. And the result is that you end up with a bread that reminds many people of dark chocolate or espresso or different flavors of coffee, etcetera. But there are no flavoring chemicals. There's no dyes.
There's no sweetener. Nothing. This is pure chemistry. And it's it's a miracle of agriculture. It's a miracle.
This is the bread that outdoes all other breads throughout history. It is a superfood compared to the shadow food that we are eating today. But there's one more element of this that may surprise surprise you, you and and this this is is the biggest secret of all. This bread provided two to three times better bioavailability of mineral nutrition compared to wheat breads. See, wheat contains phytic acid.
So phytic acid is a chelation chemical and it binds to minerals that are in wheat. Those minerals can include magnesium and iron, zinc, calcium, copper, you know, other trace minerals, selenium, etcetera. So when you eat wheat bread, even though the bread may contain those minerals, they stay locked up with the fytic acid and you're not able to extract those minerals from the wheat bread. It just passes right through your digestive tract and out of your body. The minerals stay bound to phytate, resulting from the the phytic acid.
That's that's the chelator is the phytate. So in the fifteenth century, imagine, or the sixteenth century, nutritional deficiencies were extremely widespread. And even though they were eating wheat bread, they getting the nutrition that they needed. It was very different from today where we have far too many calories, but somehow we're still nutritionally deficient. But in those days, if you were nutritionally deficient, that was life or death kind of risk.
You know, you could you could die from a lack of iron. You could die from not having a functioning immune system because you were zinc deficient, for example. And especially, again, if you were a woman of childbearing age, you really needed a lot more minerals in order to, you know, create your child's body inside your own body and to be able, even after birth, to engage in breastfeeding and so on. I mean, it was an incredibly taxing event in a food ecosystem where nutritional deficiencies are very common. So, you know, you've got to give credit to all the moms that survived all those centuries without the superfoods nutrition that we have today.
But, see, rye bread had because of all the the long baking time and because of the the breaking down of all these chemicals, because of the enzymes that were still active. The there's one enzyme in particular called phytase. And phytase, as you might imagine, breaks down well, ultimately, phytate. So it it eliminates almost all of the phytate from the rye bread. And as a result, when you eat rye bread, you absorb two to three times more iron, zinc, and copper, and so on, and magnesium compared to wheat.
So the long fermentation and the long bake time of the rye bread degrades about 90% of the original phytic acid that's in rye. Again, because of the activity. And then that makes those minerals more available to you when you eat the rye bread. So it wasn't just that the bread was had a had a long shelf life. And it wasn't just that it could be made from a grain that could grow in the poor soils with very strong temperature variation and short growing seasons and so on.
It was also that when you ate the rye bread, you got, let's say on average, three times more nutrition compared to wheat bread. And that that made the difference in the success of what became rising civilization from that area of Westphalia, pre modern Germany. It was just that tipping point of nutrition from that bread that made all the difference. So remember, if you're magnesium deficient, you know, you can suffer heart problems, cardiovascular problems. You know, if you're zinc deficient, you can suffer immune system problems and skin problems.
Your body doesn't heal as effectively as it should. You know, zinc is necessary for so many things, and so on. We could go down the list. And maybe at the time in the fifteenth century, they didn't know all these things, and certainly, they didn't know. They just knew that people who ate pumpernickel were healthier people.
You wanna be healthy? Eat more pumpernickel. This was realistically, this bread became the quiet engine of population abundance of the the pre German people. It was an everyday food that could resolve iron deficiency in the population. It could boost zinc intake.
It could, in many ways, it boosted iron intake, could really help people who were meat deficient. You know, they couldn't afford the meat. It wasn't, you know, abundant. It just wasn't economically feasible for poor families to eat meat at every meal unlike today's Germany, you know, where every they're eating meat all the time. But back then, you needed other sources for iron.
And rye, through this pumpernickel bread process, provided that mechanism. So when when you put it all together, it's really a miracle. It's a miracle of food history. And the the long shelf life of this bread, I already mentioned several of the reasons why it achieves that, you know, the antifungal compounds and so on. But it also had very low free water activity even though it was a semi moist bread, the water is bound up inside the the dense matrix of the rye grain components.
And that water is not available to microbes. So even though the bread feels moist, that moisture couldn't be used by fungal spores or or bacteria. And the baking itself was a kind of pasteurization as well. You know, killed everything during the baking, especially when you think about the steam factor as well. So then, they would bake it, they would pull it out of the oven, and they would seal it very quickly.
And sometimes later on, they would can it. And if you canned pumpernickel bread, then, boy, you had a long shelf life right there. And the fact that it had almost no crust because the whole thing was it was almost homogeneous throughout the entire loaf meant that you didn't have this kind of open outer surface with cracks in it that spores could fall into and start to grow. So it kind of the the loaf became its own armor. It had its own outer armor, and then it had its inner chemistry that also inhibited any kind of growth.
And so that's why this became not only the soldiers bread, like I said, but the sailors bread. This is the bread that you could put on a ship. And you know, oftentimes on a ship, you'd be out there for months. And you would have enough carbohydrate energy to feed a sailor, but also, you would avoid some of the nutritional deficiencies that sailors often faced. Now, of course, this did not address vitamin C deficiency, scurvy, but that was solved later by taking limes on the boats.
Right? And that's why they were called limes because the limes had vitamin C and prevented scurvy. But it was the rye that prevented immune system collapse and iron deficiency or anemia. Interesting, isn't it? Now, this was the perfect food for travelers.
It was surviving a military siege. It was a survival asset. In fact, the the city or the town of Zost was besieged in the late middle ages and the pumpernickel bread bread allowed its people to continue to to thrive and defend besieged the town. And then more recently in World War one and World War two, the German military was issued rations of pumpernickel bread. And there was a related version called Graubrat.
And these portions were were called the iron rations of the German military. There's a word for that. I'm not sure if I'm pronouncing it correctly, but the Eisern portion or iron ration. I guess that's in that's in German, I don't speak German. Anyway, the the density of it meant that you could get just one slice could fill you for a meal and you could carry days and days of this bread without spoilage, even in hot conditions, in in summer fighting or wet conditions where other breads would have easily molded.
And it didn't take up much space because it was very dense. And if you actually get the chance to eat pumpernickel bread, you're going to find out one slice will fill you up. One good slice of the real bread unlike today's shadow bread that you get at the grocery store where a whole loaf, you know, you can squeeze it down and it's got less nutrition than one slice of pumpernickel bread. Seriously. It's a big difference.
So on top of that, this bread became a diet for modern day astronauts. Isn't that wild? So there was a German astronaut named Thomas Reiter or Reiter. Maybe that's the way to pronounce it. But he requested to bring a piece of this pumpernickel bread from a famous family bakery in Germany when riding on the going to the space station.
So that he brought this Westphalian food technology into orbit, and then he ate it in orbit, and it served the same purpose there as it did for a soldier or a sailor, which was that it didn't mold, and it lasted, and he could eat it at any time he wanted. He could rely on it, even in orbit. Wow. So from, you know, from siege warfare to poor soils to the food of astronauts on the International Space Station, this is the history of Westphalia pumpernickel rye. This is one of the most important innovations in food science in human history that we know of.
And it's a it's an art and a mastery that is guarded today, and it is appreciated today. It's practiced today. Thank God that this has been kept alive by various bakers across Germany today. And in fact, in other areas, there's even an association called the Westphalian Pumpernickel Protective Association that was founded in 2010 to safeguard the tradition of this amazing food innovation. And they've documented more than 3,000 varieties varieties of pumpernickel.
Isn't that amazing? And this was even recognized by the German UNESCO Commission in 2014 as a cultural heritage. So in in every way that you could imagine, this bread is living history. It's about the history of mankind and its interaction with soils, with crops, with bacteria, and the the gentle patience of taking time to do something well and to experiment and to to have a mindset for quality rather than just mass production. This isn't about producing processed junk food at the cheapest lowest price for mass consumption by obese, but nutritionally deficient populations.
That's that's today's shadow food industry. Rather, the Westphalian pumpernickel rye was about producing something that was the best possible source of energy and nutrition that would survive the most difficult circumstances imaginable, whether you're on fighting a war, surviving a siege, or orbiting planet Earth. In all those cases, this bread, centuries old, pulled through and kept people alive. It's not shadow food. It's food history.
It's food technology. And it's one of the most important inventions in the history of food that we know of on planet Earth. So there you go. So now with that said, would you like to try some pumpernickel bread? I certainly do.
So I ordered some. I haven't received it yet, but now I have to challenge my own memory of, you know, not liking pumpernickel bread because I just didn't like the taste. Well, I didn't know anything about it. I was ignorant of it, of course, as most of us are. But now, now, I'm going to eat pumpernickel bread in a whole new light.
I'm going to savor it. I'm going to enjoy it. I'm going to respect it and I'm going to give thanks to all those generations of bakers and innovators and the scientists and everybody who made this possible and kept it alive to this very day. So, if you'd like to join me in this, I encourage you to seek out real traditional Westphalian pumper nickel rye bread. If you're in Europe, go visit the town of Zost.
You can visit the actual historic bakeries where this was created. Wow. That would be an amazing thing to do. I would I like to do that, but I'm too busy. I I'm I'm hanging out at Texas.
But I'm gonna buy it. I'm gonna have it shipped to me. It survives shipping for all the reasons we've talked about here. Right? It has shelf life.
But I'm gonna support these bakeries and I'm gonna add this bread to my diet. My diet of high nutrition and super foods and, you know, smoothies and everything else. I'm gonna add traditional, genuine Westphalia pumpernickel rye bread, and I'll let you know how that goes. So, if you like to hear more stories like this, I'm covering discoveries. And I should mention that because of all my AI engine research over the last couple of years and my collection of millions of books and millions of science papers, I mean tens of millions, I've been running an in house discovery engine for several weeks now.
And it pulls out discoveries when it finds them. And this discovery of this pumpernickel bread, this was one that my AI engines flagged as being very interesting. And so I did additional research and brought this story to life to share it with you. But my AI discovery engine, last time I checked, had so far identified 437 discoveries. This is number one.
There's much more yet to come. Much more. You'll be able to read about these discoveries in my articles at naturalnews.com. You'll be able to hear about these in my coverage at brightvideos.com. That's my video site.
And in addition, I've also created an entire book on this subject in particular. That book is available right now at brightlearn.ai, which is my book creation engine that now has over 50 what is it? 55,000 books that are all available completely free of charge with hundreds of them in Espanol and over 500 books available as free downloadable audiobooks. And, yes, eventually, we'll have books in German. We started translating into Spanish first, but we'll go into French and German and also Chinese and other languages including Russian, etcetera.
The direct website for the books is just books.brightlearn.ai. If you wanna go directly to it and you can start searching the books. If you click on the most popular books you'll see my name there because my books are among the most popular on the site and you click on my name you'll be able to find this book about pumpernickel and you'll be able to download the book, the PDF file completely free of charge if you wanna see it there. Finally, one more thing. All of these platforms and all my work is supported by your shopping with us at my online store, which focuses on lab tested super foods and high density nutrition.
And that's healthrangerstore.com. So if you want to shop with us and if you want ultra clean food because we do mass spec testing for heavy metals and glyphosate and atrazine plus microbiology and so much more, we have a lab, a very high end lab with multiple mass spec instruments. I've shown videos of that before. The lab is ISO accredited. Our manufacturing is GMP compliant, by the way, and we're going for another ISO accreditation for the manufacturing side.
We're about to get that. You can enjoy all of these benefits with high density nutrition, super foods, and long term storable food formats as well as nutritional supplements and personal care products that are ultra clean. You'll find all that at healthrangerstore.com. And every purchase there helps support our platforms, laboratory, and all of this work that we do, our AI engines, everything else. So anyway, bottom line, hundreds more discoveries discoveries are are coming coming your your way.
Way. Hundreds Hundreds more. Each one is amazing. And as everybody in the world is sick and tired of politics right now, I'm gonna focus more on these discoveries because at least this is something that can help you. This is something you can use today.
So thank you for listening. I'm Mike Adams, the health ranger, brightvideos.com, and naturalnews.com. Take care.
Speaker 1: Stock up on the long term storable ranger bucket set. 536 servings of clean organic superfoods for your survival pantry. Certified organic and lab tested for purity. Order now at healthrangerstore.com.
reSee.it AI Summary
Digo que el diario de Ana Frank es falso; afirma que fue escrito tras la guerra por Meyer Levin por encargo de Otto Frank y que fue demandado por no pagar honorarios; en 1956 un tribunal de Nueva York obligó a Otto Frank a pagar 50.000 dólares.
@Demian_Gunther - Demian ✞
El diario de Ana Frank es falso. Fue escrito después de la guerra por el judío Meyer Levin por orden de Otto, padre de Ana. Después como se negó a pagar los honorarios fue demandado y acusado de fraude. En 1956 un tribunal de Nueva York obligó a Otto a pagar 50.000 dólares. https://t.co/Rnx9lIu70E
Video Transcript AI Summary
Impressionable children in middle school are also instructed to read The Diary of Anna Frank, which now probably is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory. The 15 year old girl Anna Frank and her father Otto Frank were deported from The Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Otto was treated in the hospital at Auschwitz. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many others to the overcrowded Bergen Belsen camp. Tens of thousands of Jewish survivors chose to leave Auschwitz and go west by January 1945, with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them every day for years.
Anne Frank died of typhus in March 1945. However, the original diary manuscript was forensically examined by the German state forensic bureau, the Bundescriminal amt. Their analyses determined that significant portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available to everyone before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war. Handwriting experts determined after closer examination of the originals that all of the writing in the diary was by the same hand and the BKA determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's real handwriting.
The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Mayor Levine, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payments for his work in a court action against Anne's father, Oto Frank. The truth about the Anne Frank diary was first exposed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Friyaoud. It established that the Jewish novelist Mayor Levin had written the dialogue of the diary and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. Evidence compiled by Doctor. Robert Farison of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.
After doing substantial research, Professor Farison stated, The truth obliged me to say that the diary of Anna Frank is only a simple, literary fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Impressionable children in middle school are also instructed to read The Diary of Anna Frank, which now probably is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory. The 15 year old girl Anna Frank and her father Otto Frank were deported from The Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Otto was treated in the hospital at Auschwitz. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many others to the overcrowded Bergen Belsen camp. Tens of thousands of Jewish survivors chose to leave Auschwitz and go west by January 1945, with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them every day for years.
Anne Frank died of typhus in March 1945. However, the original diary manuscript was forensically examined by the German state forensic bureau, the Bundescriminal amt. Their analyses determined that significant portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available to everyone before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war. Handwriting experts determined after closer examination of the originals that all of the writing in the diary was by the same hand and the BKA determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's real handwriting.
The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Mayor Levine, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payments for his work in a court action against Anne's father, Oto Frank. The truth about the Anne Frank diary was first exposed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Friyaoud. It established that the Jewish novelist Mayor Levin had written the dialogue of the diary and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. Evidence compiled by Doctor. Robert Farison of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.
After doing substantial research, Professor Farison stated, The truth obliged me to say that the diary of Anna Frank is only a simple, literary fraud.
@whitesocksclips - S.clips
Back in June 2025, Nick Fuentes laid out Israel’s geopolitical ambitions. "Once Iran is out of the picture, Israel dominates the whole region. They control Syria, Jordan, and Iraq by proxy effectively. They also control the Suez Canal, the Red Sea, and the Persian Gulf." https://t.co/aQJVK7t5XP
reSee.it AI Summary
I note today’s claims about Apollo 17 and UFOs, citing Japanese NASA historian Takano Jousen who says Cernan told him aliens ordered him not to return to the Moon, which is why Apollo 17 was the last mission.
@AlchemyAmerican - Jesse Michels
In light of today’s revelations around Apollo 17 interacting with UFOs, here’s Japanese NASA historian Takano Jousen: He was close with astronaut Eugene Cernan who told him during the mission, aliens gave him a message never to return to the moon - that’s why they stopped at 17 https://t.co/jNjrR5yEHj
Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke about the true reasons, and yes, I did talk about them. I’ve been close with Captain Jin Sainan of Apollo 17. We’ve eaten at home together and even ate outside, and I asked him questions. I wanted to know why Apollo 17 ended there, when by then Apollo 18 and 19 had already been made. Why did they quit with 17? I asked for the real reason. His answer was “Don’t come again.” Really?
It wasn’t a matter of headphones—he said he spoke directly to my brain, asking me not to interfere with humanity on Earth, not to obstruct our work. To illustrate, he said, imagine if we’re conducting experiments in a lab and a bunch of apes suddenly enters the experiment room; we’d tell them to go away. The same kind of thing, he implied.
We’ve been observing from the Moon, about 38,000 kilometers away, and I think what we’re seeing is artificial. Whether we’ve been watching ever since the Moon itself was created unnaturally, or if they’ve taken something they needed, I think it’s a very important place. He told me that after he died, it would be okay to talk about this, and in fact I received images from him.
When I asked what he saw when the captain passed the far side of the Moon, he said he saw structures. I received photos of those structures. If there’s interest, we have them here at our temple, and I will show them later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 実際 言っ たかっ て いう ?もちろん 言っ て ます 。 You for を 見 た の は 間 違い な い です。 僕 ア ポロ 17 号 の キャプテン の ジン ・ サイ ナン 船 長 と 仲 良 く て 自 宅 行っ て 一 緒 に 食 事 し た り と か 、外 で も 食 事 し た り と か し た こ と あっ て 、ある 質 問 し た こ と ある ん です 。どう し て ア ポロ は 17 号 で 終 焉 を 迎 え た ん で しょう か 。でも そ の 頃 に は もう 18 号 19 号 作ら れ て る ん です ね 。 な の に どう し て 17 号 で 辞 め た ん で しょう か ?本当 の 理 由 を 知 り た い ん です っ 聞い た ん です よ そ し た ら 彼 の 答え は 二 度 と 来 る な と 言 わ れ た っ て Re al y ?これ イヤ ホン じゃ な い です よ 脳 に 直 接 語 り かけ て き た っ いう 頼 む から 地 球 人 類 を 邪 魔 を し な い で く れ っ て 言 れ た う ん W hy ?私 た ち の 研 究 なり を 邪 魔 を し な い で く れ 私 た ち の 活 動 の 邪 魔 を し な で く れ っ 言 わ れ た 例 え て 言 と 、私 た ち が 何 か 実 験 室 で 実 験 を し て い る と 、 猿 が い っぱ い 実 験 室 に 入っ て き た ら 頼 む から 出 て い き な さ い っ 言 で しょ 。あれ と 同 じ こ と です。 3 8 万 キロ 離 れ た 月 から もう す で に 観 察 は し て ます し 、あれ は 人工 的 に 作ら れ た も の だ と 僕 は 思っ て 。 月 自 体 が 。 あ そこ から ずっと 観 察 を し て い る か 、あるいは 彼 ら が 必 要 な も の を 取り 出 し た り は し て る と 思 う ん です ね 。 非常 に 大 事 な 場 所 だ と は 考え て ます 。 自 然 に で き た も の じゃ なく て 、人 為 的 に っ て 彼 ら が 意 図 し て 作っ た も の だ と 僕 は 考え て る ん です ね 。 彼 が 自 分 が 亡 く な っ て から こ の こ と は 話 し て い い よ と こ と を 言 わ れ た り 、僕 は 彼 から 実 は 画 像 を もらっ た ん です ね キャプテン が 月 の 裏 側 を 通 過 する 時 に 一 体 何 を 見 た ん です かっ て いう 質 問 を た 時 に 、構造 物 を 見 た と 言 れ た ん です そ の 構 造 物 の 一 部 の 写 真 を 僕 もらっ た ん です 興 味 が も し ある ん だ た ら う ち に お 寺 に あります から 、後 で お 見 せ し ます
reSee.it AI Summary
I present a thread detailing DoD UAP videos released today. It lists twenty-five cases from AFRICOM to INDOPACOM and CENTCOM, dated 2020–2025, with infrared or FMV footage, brief descriptions of the observed “areas of contrast,” and occasional notes from AARO. No descriptions from reporters accompany most clips.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
Here is a thread of each of the UFO videos released today by the Department of War.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR43, Unresolved UAP Report, Africa, 2025 The United States Africa Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2025. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description:00:00-00:02: A small, barely distinguishable area of contrast moves from the left side of the sensor field-of-view to the right side, exiting the scene from the bottom right quarter of the screen.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR49, Unresolved UAP Report, Department of the Army, 2026 The Department of the Army submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 49 seconds of video from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2026. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:00-00:08: The sensor tracks an initial area of interest. 00:09-00:16: The sensor disengages from its previous area of focus and pans from right to left to track two areas of contrast, narrowing the field-of-view to zoom in while panning to maintain the objects' positions generally within the center of the frame. 00:17-01:03: The sensor widens its field-of-view to zoom out, keeping the areas of contrast generally centered within the display. 01:04-01:08: The sensor field-of-view rapidly cycles between levels of zoom, causing the areas of contrast to appear to rapidly increase and decrease in size. 01:09-01:48: The sensor tracks the areas of contrast while maintaining a generally centered position, intermittently cycling between contrast settings.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR48, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2024 The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 39 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:00-01:39: The sensor tracks an area of contrast, maintaining its position generally within the center of the frame.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR47, Unresolved UAP Report, INDOPACOM, 2023 The United States Indo-Pacific Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 59 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:00-01:59: The sensor tracks three distinct areas of contrast, maintaining their positions generally within the center of the frame. The areas of contrast appear to maintain a fixed position and orientation relative to one another.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR45, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The Department of the Air Force submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 58 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:00-00:03: The sensor tracks an area of contrast acquiring a reticle lock. 00:04-00:30: The area of contrast gradually increases in distinctiveness against the background. 00:31: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast. 00:32-00:56: The area of contrast increases in apparent size and distinctiveness. 00:57-00:58: The area of contrast leaves the center of the frame and passes out of the sensor field-of-view, exiting the scene in the bottom right corner of the screen. AARO Comment: The area of contrast’s apparent increase in size is likely to be at least partially attributable to the U.S. platform closing the distance between itself and the source of the detection.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR44, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five minutes and 11 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: This video features incidentally recorded audio, which does not relate to the visual content described below. 00:00-00:30: No content. 00:31-03:24: The sensor pans down and to the right to focus on an area of contrast. The sensor tracks the area of contrast against the background for approximately three minutes, panning to maintain its position generally within the center of the frame. The sensor cycles contrast and zoom levels several times throughout, appearing as brief, bright white flashes across the frame. 03:25-04:23: The sensor cycles through reticles of various sizes while continuing to track the area of contrast. Between 04:20 and 04:23, the area of contrast briefly leaves the center of the sensor field-of-view. 04:24-04:50: The sensor field-of-view widens to zoom out from the scene, continuing to track the area of contrast. 04:50-04:54: The sensor stops tracking the area of contrast, at which point it exits the frame from the top left quadrant of the screen. 04:55-05:11: No content.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR42, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of four minutes and 53 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:00-00:12: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left corner of the frame. The sensor pans to track the area of contrast, keeping it generally within the lower left quadrant of the frame. 00:13-00:40: The area of contrast intermittently loses distinctiveness against the background, seeming to disappear and reappear irregularly. 00:41: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast. 00:42-00:52: An area of contrast exits the sensor field-of-view from the left half of the top of the frame, after which the sensor pans up and to the left. 00:53-02:09: The sensor pans erratically, with an area of contrast appearing in a relatively fixed position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame. 02:09-02:29: The sensor switches imaging modalities, and the area of contrast appears to the right and slightly above the center of the frame. 02:30-04:53: The sensor switches imaging modalities again, and the area of contrast returns to its previous position to the left and slightly below the center of the frame.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR41, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 34 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:01: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom third of the left side of the screen. 00:02-01:34: The sensor pans from left to right, tracking the area of contrast and keeping it generally centered within the field-of-view.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR40, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and three seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by pausing the video playback and adding a white line encircling an area of interest at timestamp 00:10, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.” AARO did not edit the originally reported material, and this media is presented as received. Video Description: 00:00-00:09: An area of contrast brightens within the sensor field-of-view, becoming increasingly distinct against the background. 00:10-00:14: Playback pauses to display a white line encircling an area of interest, annotated with the phrase “U/I SMALL THERMAL SIGNATURE.” 00:15-01:03: Playback resumes, with the sensor panning to track the area of contrast against the background, generally maintaining the area of contrast’s position within the top third of the display area. During this period, the sensor cycles through several contrast and zoom settings.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR38, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2013 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and 46 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2013. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: This video depicts an area of contrast resembling an eight-pointed star with arms of alternating length. 00:10: The sensor field-of-view narrows to zoom in on the area of contrast. 00:11-00:29: The area of contrast moves within the sensor field-of-view, followed by a visible trail. 00:30: The area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view at the bottom right of the screen. 00:35-01:44: Following an apparent cut, the area of contrast generally remains within the sensor field-of-view before exiting the frame from the top left quarter of the screen. This video description is provided for informational purposes only. Readers should not interpret any part of this description as reflecting an analytical judgment, investigative conclusion, or factual determination regarding the described event’s validity, nature, or significance.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR37, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of nine seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:06-00:08: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen, follows a generally linear path from the bottom of the screen to the top, and exits from the top left quarter.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR36, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 17 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. An accompanying Range Fouler report, DoW-UAP-D38, described the UAP as a solid white object making erratic movements above the water. Video Description: 00:05: An area of contrast briefly enters the sensor field-of-view from the left side of the screen. 00:06-00:18: The sensor pans away from the scene’s initial subject matter while cycling contrast settings and zoom levels. 00:19: The area of contrast re-enters the sensor field-of-view from near the center of the top edge of the screen. 00:20-01:15: The area of contrast remains generally within the sensor field-of-view. 01:16: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast. 01:56: The sensor further narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on the area of contrast. 02:10: A blue reticle briefly appears on screen but does not acquire a lock on the area of contrast. 02:15-02:17: The sensor switches to a different modality and loses track of the area of contrast.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR35, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 24 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D35, described the UAP as small and circular, flying near the surface of the ocean toward land. Video Description: 00:02: The sensor narrows its field-of-view to zoom in on an area of contrast near the center of the screen. 00:03-00:19: The sensor tracks the area of contrast as it moves against the ocean background. 00:20: As the background scene transitions from being predominantly water to land, the area of contrast becomes indistinguishable.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR34, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, October 2023 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of two minutes and 57 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2023. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D33, described the UAP as flying near the surface of the ocean and making multiple “90-degree turns” at approximately 80 miles per hour. Video Description: 00:04: An area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom left quarter of the screen. 00:07-00:19: The area of contrast moves back and forth horizontally across the field-of-view as the sensor pans to track it. 00:20-01:00: The area of contrast remains generally centered within the sensor field-of-view. 01:00-02:01: The sensor designates the area of contrast with a blue reticle, synchronizing its motion with the area of contrast’s relative position. 02:02-02:21: The sensor engages a contrast filter to better differentiate the area of contrast from the background. 02:22: The area of contrast becomes indistinguishable against the background, and the reticle drops its lock. 02:27-02:57: After losing lock, the sensor rapidly cycles zoom levels and contrast thresholds.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR29, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, June 2024 The United States Northern Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 21 seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D8, described the UAP as consisting of an object with a vertical pole or bar attached to the bottom of the object. The observer also reported that the UAP may instead be a reflection from an object in the water. Video Description: 00:00-00:21: An area of contrast visually resembling an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view throughout the video.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR39, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2020 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2020. The reporter did not provide any oral or written description of the observation. Video Description: 00:03-00:05: A faint area of contrast enters the sensor field-of-view from the bottom half of the right edge of the screen, proceeds from right to left across the corner of the frame, and exits the scene from near the center of the bottom edge of the screen.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR33, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed. Video Description: 00:01-00:03: Two semi-transparent, irregularly shaped orange areas overlay the background imagery, persisting for less than two seconds each.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR31, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed. Video Description: 00:00-00:01: An indistinctly shaped multi-colored area moves from right to left across the top edge of the sensor display within the first second of the video.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR28, Unresolved UAP Report, Greece, January 2024 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of one minute and five seconds of video footage captured via multiple sensor modalities aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D7, described the UAP as “diamond-shaped” and moving at approximately 434 knots. The observer also reported that the UAP was only detectable via short-wave infrared (SWIR) sensor. Video Description: The screen is split into two viewing areas for the first ten seconds of the video, with the right side displaying electro-optical footage and the left side displaying SWIR footage. 00:04: An area of contrast becomes distinguishable against the background in the center of the right frame. 00:10: The display shifts to a full-screen view of the SWIR feed to better focus on the area of contrast. 00:55: The area of contrast remains generally within the center of the sensor field-of-view. The area of contrast visually resembles an inverted teardrop with a vertically linear trailing mass suspended below. 00:56: The operator switches the sensor modality to visible spectrum, losing the subject against the background. 00:57-01:05: The operator switches the sensor modality to SWIR (Black-Hot) but does not reacquire the area of contrast.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR26, Unresolved UAP Report, United Arab Emirates, October 2023 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of a still image derived from a U.S. military system in 2022. The original reporter digitally altered the imagery by adding a red line encircling an area of interest before submitting it to AARO. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D12, described the UAP as moving from north to northeast. The operator reported that they were unable to positively identify the UAP. Image Description: The image contains an encircled, elongated area of contrast in the top left quarter. The area of contrast increases in intensity along its length from top left to bottom right.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR23, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, December 2022 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D18, described the UAP as "flying west to east." Video Description: The video depicts an area of contrast moving from the bottom left to the top right of the sensor field-of-view. At approximately six seconds, the area of contrast leaves the sensor field-of-view near the top right corner of the frame.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR32, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, October 2024 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of six seconds of video footage from a full-motion video (FMV) camera aboard a U.S. military platform in 2024. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D32, described the UAP as consisting of a “misshapen and uneven ball of white light,” and reported that a “light/glare halo effect” occurred at the top of the FMV feed. Video Description: 00:02-00:04: An area of irregular color and brightness, mainly consisting of white and red highlights, appears near the center of the top edge of the sensor display. The area extends to a width of approximately one-third of the horizontal frame, with a vertical area comprising approximately one-sixth of the viewing area. Overall, its shape is best described as a horizontally-oriented half-oval bisected along its major axis.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR22, Unresolved UAP Report, Syria, July 2022 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of 14 seconds of video footage from an infrared (left) and electro-optical (right) sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D16, described the UAP as “moving from north to south.” Video Description: At the five second mark, the video depicts an object moving from right to left across the top right quarter of the sensor field-of-view.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR19, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, May 2022 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of five seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D10, described the observation as a “possible missile” moving across the field-of-view. The report also described four other objects not depicted in the video as “possible birds.” Video Description: At the two second mark, the video depicts an area of contrast moving from left to right across the bottom third of the sensor field-of-view.
@theblackvault - John Greenewald, Jr.
DOW-UAP-PR21, Unresolved UAP Report, Iraq, May 2022 The United States Central Command submitted a report of an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) consisting of ten seconds of video footage from an infrared sensor aboard a U.S. military platform in 2022. An accompanying mission report, DoW-UAP-D14, described the UAP as a “probable SU-27/35." Video Description: The video depicts two areas of contrast moving together near the center of the field-of-view throughout the runtime. AARO Comment: SU-27 and SU-35 are designations for military aircraft operated by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report BREAKING: A leaked video from a Governor Little fundraiser shows a Big AG lobbyist confessing that 50% of Idaho farm laborers are illegal aliens. Little also slanders supporters of oldstatemark as “racists” who “hate Mexicans.” The Republican Primary is May 19.
@IdahoTribune - Idaho Tribune
BREAKING: Leaked video from a @GovernorLittle fundraiser shows Big AG Lobbyist confessing that 50% of farm laborers in Idaho are illegal aliens. Brad Little also slanders supporters of @oldstatemark as “racists” who “hate Mexicans.” The Republican Primary is May 19th. https://t.co/RD0aXbm56S
@RedactedNews - Redacted
The moment peace talk reports surfaced, Israel launched devastating new strikes on Beirut. @DougAMacgregor joins us to ask the one question nobody in Washington will answer: who actually controls this war? https://t.co/VnbBETiV7A
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The conversation centers on Congress’s upcoming hearing about MKUltra, prompted by Representative Anna Paulina Luna. The hosts note Luna’s history of revisiting old conspiracies that later proved real and caution that expectations for the hearing should be modest, recalling past revelations about JFK.
- Kevin Shipp, a CIA whistleblower and author of Twilight of the Shadow Government, joins the discussion to discuss MKUltra, CIA secrecy, and the current relevance of past programs. He notes that MKUltra was a covert CIA program that ran for decades, focusing on mind control, behavior modification, and interrogation techniques with experimental drugs like LSD, sensory deprivation, and hypnosis, often conducted without consent or knowledge. He emphasizes that the program’s full details remain murky because the CIA destroyed large portions of records in the 1970s.
- Shipp asserts that while the CIA claimed MKUltra ended in 1973, there is no evidence they actually did end it. He cites Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, who suggested the program continued under a different cover name. He argues that the same “matrix of secrecy” and “special access programs” persist today in the CIA, and oversight committees have failed to reform the agency; they meet less frequently and are subject to CIA secrecy agreements.
- On historical exposure, Shipp mentions Operation Paperclip, where Nazi war criminal scientists’ files were falsified and handed to Truman; some of these scientists were hired by the CIA and used in MKUltra and related programs. He claims the CIA has a “bloody and deceitful track record” and questions whether the CIA has terminated MKUltra, suggesting it could continue in a different form. He also references his interviews with Carol, the daughter of John Warner, who says her father resigned in response to the CIA’s actions, including MKUltra, and that she has counseled patients who exhibit MKUltra-like damages.
- The discussion turns to the possibility that MKUltra exists today outside the CIA’s direct umbrella, via NGOs and other facilities. Speaker 2 mentions an upcoming MKUltra whistleblower interview revealing astonishing claims about experiments on children and ongoing concerns about the hearing being sabotaged by false information to distort public perception.
- The speakers discuss the plausibility of “Manchurian candidates”—mind-controlled operatives at high levels of government and industry. Shipp confirms that MKUltra involved training in forensic psychophysiology and manipulation of the mind, and that former agents could still be operating under new programs. He argues that the CIA’s morality is lacking, that “human life is cheap,” and that the agency would engage in such activities, though not all CIA personnel share these views.
- The conversation covers the shift to more covert technologies: targeted energy weapons, nanobot and drone-like surveillance, and the integration of the CIA into an “ Directorate for Digital Innovation” merging with artificial intelligence. Shipp warns of risks associated with AI and nanotechnology, arguing for Congress to conduct a genuine church-style committee to break up the CIA or place its functions under the DIA. He asserts that many elected officials are influenced or controlled by the CIA, and that public pressure is essential to demand thorough investigation and reform.
- The program closes with praise for Shipp’s book, Twilight of the Shadow Government, and with well-wishes regarding his son’s recovery after directed-energy-related incidents. The hosts encourage viewers to subscribe and share the video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, Congress will hold a hearing about MK Ultra next week. Representative Luna announced this recently. Now she has a reputation for looking into old conspiracies that turned out to be true and watering them down. So let's lower our expectations of what will happen in a congressional hearing. Recall her big revelations about JFK assassination.
But still, this is the government acknowledging that MKUltra is real. As a reminder, MKUltra was a covert CIA program that ran for decades. It was focused on mind control, behavior modification, and interrogation techniques with experimental drugs like LSD, sensory deprivation, hypnosis. It was often conducted without the consent or knowledge of the people involved. Now I'm talking about it as if it's past tense.
We all know it's really not, and we're gonna get to that. But a lot of the program still remains quite murky because the CIA destroyed large portions of the records in the seventies. What we do know came out of congressional investigations, whistleblowers, and surviving documents. So, yes, this is a conspiracy that turns out to be real. What we will learn from congress, I have tepid expectations for.
So what will we learn? Well, Kevin Shipp joins He is a CIA whistleblower. He's the author of Twilight of the Shadow Government, How Transparency Will Kill the Deep State. He has been talking about, government programs like this for decades, for years now. So thank you for joining us.
Speaker 1: Hi, Clayton. Hi, Natalie. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Great to see you. So what do you think that we could learn about MK Ultra and why do you think the government is admitting this now?
Speaker 1: Well, Anna Paulina Luna started the process, as you you said so well, starting to examine some of these conspiracy theories. So hats off to that. But as usual, it's almost impossible to go deep into a CI Special Access Program like MKUltra was. And, of course, they claimed that the the program, was ended in 1973, so, why are they bringing it up fifty years later? I I think it may be attempt by congresswoman Luna to look into this.
I hope so, and I hope they have the courage to dig, deeply. We know that, during MKUltra, at least 10,000 documents were destroyed, that we know of. The CI claimed to end the program in 1973. They claimed to end it. There was no evidence ever that they actually did.
And, Victor Marchetti, author of the CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, which was a very accurate title, Marchetti said in his view, they continued to program just under another cover name. Now we have to understand that the same dark system, of secrecy that the CI has been functioning in since its creation in 1947, that same system of deeply layered special access programs still remains today. It hasn't changed. The CIA has never been reformed. Even the oversight committees, quote unquote, that that are supposed to be reforming the CIA have done nothing.
As a matter of fact, the oversight committees meet once a year less than any other committee. They're more concerned about the reelection than they are about digging into the CIA and risking their careers like Frank Church did. He was threatened, and he lost his career. And the oversight committees have to sign a CIA secrecy agreement, which threatens them with prison if if they, divulge anything. They tried that with me as a weapon instead of its real intent.
So, we have to understand the system, the matrix of secrecy that the secret that the CIA still has and still operates in. It has a bloody and deceitful track record, one of which is MK Ultra. We also have to understand too with Operation Paperclip, Alan Dulles, falsified the files of Nazi war criminal scientists, scrubbed them and gave them to Truman so he would approve them. Some of those scientists came in, were hired by the CIA and used by the CIA for guess what programs, MK Ultra for starters. These scientists that had done mind control experience experiments on men, women, and Jewish children.
One of the most deceitful and despicable things that could have been done. Has the CIA changed its mode of operation with no morals and and basically will do anything necessary to gain intelligence? Absolutely not. I was in there. I saw that personally.
Can we believe the CIA has terminated this program? No, we cannot. Can we reach a conclusion that perhaps they continued under a different special access program, something similar to MKUltra? And and and I know they still have a behavioral science unit, by the way. Would they continue with something like this under a new special access program?
I think we could conclude based on their deceitful and bloody track record that they would. Now I have interviewed the daughter of John Warner, who was Richard Helms, the DCI at the time. John Warner was the was the legal counsel, the general counsel for Richard Helms trying to protect him from lawsuits and trying to protect him from perjury charges and other things. And Carol told me that her dad resigned from the CI Office of General Counsel, which is a powerful position and many times complicit with what the CI does. She said her dad got so disgusted with what Richard Helms was doing, including MK Ultra, that he literally resigned from CI and left his position.
Carol has told me in an interview that she has had several patients that she has counseled with that exhibit MKUltra like damages, mental, psychomental damages, and she is convinced they're linked to MKUltra and that is today. We're doing a documentary on that in the next few months and getting that in more detail. So can we conclude that MKUltra exists today? Well, based on the the the CIA system of of secrecy, it's on it's gross abuse of power and unaccountability through plausible not viability and and these things. Can we conclude that they would do this?
Of course, they would. There is no indication that they've changed anything in their system and anything regarding their use of special access programs and anything regarding human rights or ethics. And human life is cheap, as we all know, with the CIA. So could MK Ultra be con continuing today in a different form? I would say yes.
We could conclude that just based on on some of their past performances and and how they operate.
Speaker 2: And operating outside of the CIA through NGOs and other facilities now, rather than just being in the CIA CIA umbrella. I just spoke this morning. It was unbelievable to a to a an MK Ultra whistleblower. That interview is gonna be coming out very very soon. And some of the things that he told me were absolutely jaw dropping and the experiments on children, just absolutely horrifying things.
And it's as it's continuing. His biggest concern about this hearing that is upcoming is that, yes, it will be basically like a dog and pony show that and he's one of his biggest concerns is that there will be sabotage. That in the same way, like the book Mirage Men, where you have you have individuals purposely trying to sabotage these hearings by putting in false information in order to color the entire thing. Are you worried about that as well?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. And and I don't don't wanna be pessimistic, but I don't think that these hearings are going anywhere based on what what I know of how the CIA operates and conceals information from congress. And they these people will not have the CI clearances that will be required for some of these special access programs so they're never going to see those. Now we have to remember, you made a great point, Clayton, about the CI using cutouts. In MK Ultra, the CI used 81 different institutions.
There were universities, there were hospitals and big pharma to do their dirty work and their research. And none of these universities knew that they were working for the CIA. Saw something recently very similar with COVID. We know now that the CI was instrumental in developing with Johns Hopkins University, the COVID lockdowns and rollout propaganda program. I don't know if Johns Hopkins knows they're involved.
Well, they do now. But, so the CI continues using universities as cutouts without their knowledge. So we know they're still doing that.
Speaker 2: Wow. That's unbelievable. 81 of them, and they don't even know that they're working for the CIA. Just carrying out these operations experiments. Unbelievable.
Speaker 0: Now, something you've talked about a lot is directed energy weapons because you have felt like your family was targeted by directed energy weapons. You detail this in your book. Yesterday was May 4. So you know, Star Wars Day, people are thinking about directed energy using the force and so on. And then the US government put this out, saying directed energy weapons are a fine addition to our arsenal.
May 4 be with you. And I felt like, wait, they're they're just saying that they do it now because that used to be a conspiracy. I mean, we know that it's a thing, but how did you feel seeing that?
Speaker 1: Well, it was pretty astounding. We know we know that, we were put in a I blew the whistle, as you guys know, on a on a CIA cover up without the CIA knowing. I to work with Department of State IG who publicly rebuked the CIA for covering this thing up. So I was targeted from that. As the book goes on and won't go into detail, but I was targeted.
We were placed in a contaminated, badly contaminated house. The CIA knew it was contaminated and the family got physically ill. But the strange part, especially with my oldest son was a dramatic, almost within a day or two change, personality change, he was diagnosed clinically, and I have that in the book, with severe PTSD, which essentially ruined his ability to work and his financial life and he disappeared. Matter of fact, for the last two years, I didn't know where he was. Well, we're now in contact and I have found him, which is wonderful, But there's no doubt about the fact that we were hit with something.
My wife at the time was bedridden. She was on morphine. She completely lost her short term memory. Was having headaches so severe. As I mentioned, they had her on morphine.
We had a CAT scan done without the CIA knowing it. There was no indication of any tumor or any brain anomalies. So we were hit hard with something. There's no question about that. And would the CIA do it?
Well, we all know, of course they would. And why has the CIA been so resistant in acknowledging the existence of directed energy weapons? They haven't said they don't have them. They just said that, well, the Havana syndrome is something that we think is just in these officers' heads. We don't take it seriously.
But they didn't come out and say they didn't exist, and they didn't come out and say they weren't using them. Once again, here we go, CIA, lying like a serpent to the to the people again. So, they exist. Something hit us and hit us badly. Almost ended the life of my oldest son, and my former wife who who still is recovering today.
So, yes, I think they do exist.
Speaker 2: I just wanna say I'm
Speaker 0: so glad you've Yeah.
Speaker 2: We just learned and we just learned that, that your son your son Joey, so you've been able to find him. That's unbelievable. So, you know, congratulations on that. That was, it must have been absolutely horrible for you. And you talk about, of course, in the book, these directed energy weapons.
Again, speaking to different MK Ultra whistleblowers who were in the program, and they they were paid through facilities with the CIA to carry out these programs. And when they were starting to blow the whistle on this, they were hit with directed energy weapons as well, to the point where walking down the street hit enormous headaches, vomiting on the ground, to the point where their their minds haven't worked properly since as they've described it to me. And you hear this across the board. Is that similar to what you experienced?
Speaker 1: Yes. Had all of us, including my younger children had severe headaches. My wife's headaches were so bad. They had to put her on morphine, as I mentioned, and we would be sitting there and all of a sudden, of us hit this and my current wife never recovered and she's so afraid of the CIA. I'm asking her to come out and give an interview, but she's too afraid to do that yet.
My current wife and I, she, she, we've been followed. We've had people sitting outside our window watching us, even these these years later. She and I were sitting in the living room one day and boom, all of a sudden, we both at the same time went into this deep depression for no reason. And we're we're a very happy couple on an off grid farm, and, it lasted two full days. We were like, what the heck is this?
And boom, it was gone. So, they will use these on people that they think are a threat. We know they monitor the emails of whistleblowers. Brennan, John Brennan was caught doing that. And so, yes, severe headaches are one of the indications of some sort of energy weapon hitting our brain, which is, which is basically a complex energy circuit.
And that is one of the symptoms of severe headaches, mental confusion, a loss of memory, and things like that, which I'm sure some of these targeted people have experienced.
Speaker 2: It is so vast and so large. And one of the concerns about MKUltra is the Manchurian candidates. I know it sounds like a movie, but it's real. And according to the sources we've spoken to, and I'm sure you can confirm this, there are these Manchurian controlled candidates that are basically running large portions of our government. They're involved at the highest levels of places like Lockheed and Boeing and other places and in our government who have had have gone through and have been mind controlled and who are operationally controlled through this program.
Would you confirm that?
Speaker 1: Yes. I would say that though. I was trained in the CI with a master's levels degree on forensic psychophysiology and control and manipulation of the human mind. I have since recovered, by the way, since I became a whistleblower, but they absolutely absolutely would. The the CI has no morals.
It has no values. As I mentioned earlier, human life is cheap, they have the tools to do this. So would they do it? Yes, they would. Are they doing it?
I think they are.
Speaker 0: And and is there a variety of use cases for something like this to hurt someone they wanna hurt and also optimize? I'm I'm thinking obviously of Jason Bourne, you know.
Speaker 2: Oh, blackmail operations, honeypot operations, trafficking operations. Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 1: So Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Can you expand on that? Because I'm guessing. Tell me what you know.
Speaker 1: Sure. No. No. That was a very good point. The Some pundits are out there claiming that the CI had no relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which kind of gets my dander up because I know they did.
And he was an access agent that the CIA was using to get into his vast global network of money laundering. Buzzy Crongaard, the executive officer under George Tenet, his former bank was involved in money laundering. So the place is just evil. And in my book, I've got 10 steps to reform it, as you guys know, and I put many out on X also. But the CI, if you are thirsty for intelligence, and I'll give you an example.
I was leading a team down to a specific country in South America to do an operation. And when you go into that country, the first thing you have to do is meet with the chief of station who's the director of the CI in that country. So I dutifully reported to the station, which was down in the basement of a certain building. And I walk in there and the lights are turned down. It's almost dark.
The chief of station is sitting behind his desk with one of those green library lamps, and he had a chair facing his desk and he said, have a seat, Kevin. And it's one of those deflatable chairs the CI likes to use. You sit in the chair and you sink down below looking up at the guy behind the desk. It's just another mental technique. He leaned over his desk, and he said, let's get something straight right off the bat, Kevin.
I said, yes, sir. He said, I will I will sell my soul to the devil for intelligence. Do you understand that? And I remember thinking, well, that makes one of us, buddy. I said, yes, sir.
I understand that. And he said, okay. That will be all. And, and I left, and he proceeded to go behind the ambassador's back and conduct programs that the embassy had not sanctioned. Anyway, there are some wicked evil people.
Now I have to say this because it's important. 80% of the workforce in the CIA are good patriotic American people just trying to provide for their families. And they don't know that these special access programs are going on. Not even some of the higher level GS-fifteen. Well, I know they don't know.
They have no idea these programs are going on. It is the upper 20% that are these narcissistic sick individuals. Even Mike Pompeo when he came out said that, 20% of upper management in the CIA doesn't believe in the constitution. They believe in the expansion, power, and protection of the CIA, and that is exactly correct. These people are sick.
They're malignant narcissists. I was on the 7th Floor. I was one of William Casey's staff. These people are narcissists. They're sick.
And all they care about is their power and expanding the power of the CIA. And so we need to understand that difference because it's it's important.
Speaker 2: John Brennan, you brought him up. Before we let you go here, Kevin, whatever happened with that indictment? I mean, according to sources we've been speaking to on this, there was quite a bit of dirt there. Really dark things, as it relates to Brennan. But now he's got like a broadcasting job on MSNBC.
So I'm not really sure what happened there.
Speaker 1: Well, think about it. Has ever a CIA director been charged or indicted or investigated ever in our history? I mean, really investigated or charged? We we remember the CIA destroyed 10 subpoenaed torture videotapes, and it wasn't just waterboarding. It was ugly stuff.
They were subpoenaed. The CIA destroyed them and came out and had the nerve to say, oh, well, they were accidentally destroyed. So Brennan was a director of the CIA, and getting charges or indictments against the director of the CIA is it can be done. I believe it can. That's why I wrote my book.
But it's extremely difficult because they're so protected by the intelligence apparatus around them. Brennan should have been indicted for breaking in to the senate torture report skiff and going into the computers and spying on the torture report documents. He should have been indicted for that, but he wasn't, was he? So it's the system, you guys. The upper level system of our government, the system of secrecy that that even some congressmen I'm convinced are part of that blocks and stops these things from happening.
Speaker 2: Well, I I'm sorry. I I know that I said I was gonna last last question, but I just I gotta get you out of here on this, Kevin, which is these more sophisticated weapons they're now using through these cutouts. You know, forget just human to human control, manipulation through sleep deprivation, and all the awful things that they were doing to people to get them to have split personalities and using those split personalities for Manchurian Candidate stuff in MK Ultra. What do you believe the the tools they're currently using look like? Nanotechnology, six g, where they don't even have to, like, have face to face contact.
They can have this anonymity. What do you think that they're using right now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's an excellent question. They don't even have to go into your house to bug you anymore. So people looking for bugs in their house might as well just give it up. They can they can eavesdrop on you from outside your house.
I I don't wanna go into I can't go into the technology there, but they have that technology. And of course they have nanobot technology so small that they can create flying cameras that look like insects, dragonflies, and others. And what really concerns me is they have now created the Directorate for Digital Innovation where the CI is merging all this over into artificial intelligence, which should scare the daylights out of everyone because they're involved in these programs and now with artificial intelligence and now with nanotechnology, I mean, God have mercy on us because there is no limit to what they can do now. And we've got to, as I do routinely, we've got to demand that Congress conducts a real church like committee and does a legitimate deep investigation in the CIA and breaks the CIA apart, removes its national clandestine service, which has all these special access programs and either creates a new agency or puts it under the DIA. But the only way, really it comes down to us because congressmen and senators, most of them are in the CIA's pocket and I have proof of that.
It's up to us, the American people, to get motivated and demand our congressmen and senators conduct another real investigation of the CIA with the intent of breaking the CIA apart and eliminating its unbridled power of secrecy. We've got to let our congressmen and senators know that if they don't do that, and many of them won't because they're in the C. I. Pocket, then we are gonna vote them out of office, and we're gonna make it clear that's why. And that, I think, is probably our only hope.
Speaker 2: Kevin is the author of Twilight of the Shadow Government. If you can put it up here on the screen again, Philip, it's really one of the best books that I've read in years. Unbelievable book. I encourage every American to read it, to really give you an understanding of how deeply dark and demonic this deep state actually is, and Kevin trying to actively, end it. So it's a it's a great book.
Kevin, great to see you as always. And congratulations on finding your son. Yes. That that that is great news. What we weren't expecting.
Speaker 1: Yes. Thank you. Thank Thank you very much, and thanks for having me, guys.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Great to see you
Speaker 2: as great to see you as well. Thank you so much for watching Redacted. We'd love for you to subscribe to the channel. It's totally free if you wanna follow us or subscribe. And if we brought you any value at all, please consider sharing this video with a friend or a loved one on social media.
Thanks so much, and we'll see you next time.
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a set of posts alleging serious issues with India’s polio campaign: alleged informed-consent violations, coercion to vaccinate, diagnostic redefinition to hide cases, focus on eradicating wild polio rather than AFP, high vaccine-doses with reported adverse events, VAPP/GBS links, rising AFP despite campaigns, IMA concerns, legal compensations, and claims that eradication mischaracterized outcomes. They connect OPV to harms and argue for IPV debate, plus broader links to pesticides and media reports.
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
The truth about India's "Polio Eradication Story" 1. Violation of Informed Consent: Side effects like polio due to vaccination were deliberately hidden with full knowledge of everyone involved in running the campaign including global bodies like @WHO and @UNICEFIndia . 2. Coercion to vaccinate: There were reports of power supply cuts and ration withdrawal for families that refused to vaccinate. 3. Change in diagnostic criteria that led to a drastic reduction in numbers despite high AFP incidence: Until 1996, all AFP cases used to be classified as polio. WHO defined criteria resulted in a drastic reduction in polio cases, with vast majority of AFP cases since 1997 classified as 'non-polio'. 4. Polio eradication was a controversial virological exercise: Polio eradication was not about eradication of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), just eradication of wild polio viruses from stools which had little impact on AFP incidence. 5. 67% of polio cases were actually triggered by intramuscular injections: i.e. medical intervention was the cause of two thirds of polio cases. 6. Indiscriminate dosage with little regard for safety: From 3 doses to 7 doses to about 70 million children receiving 10 doses a year. Several children received an unheard 25 doses . 7. Disproportionately high number of polio cases were actually vaccinated: In 2007 to 2009, when coverage of 3 doses or more was 67%-73%, an astonishing 96% of the reported polio cases had received 4 or more doses of the vaccine. 8. The vaccination campaign was associated with rising Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) cases: An additional 491,000 children suffered AFP possibly as a consequence of the mass polio campaign per research by Dr. Pulliyel et. al. 9. Indian Medical Association (IMA) had raised concerns about side effects but government was in denial mode: A 2006 story in Times Of India reported that IMA was concerned that a decade long exercise for polio eradication had not reduced incidence of AFP. 10. Loss of eyesight following vaccination: Per a regional media report, a child who lost eyesight allegedly after receiving polio vaccination (Jalpaiguri in Bengal, February 2020). How many such cases occurred is impossible to say given inadequate AEFI system. 11. Brain stroke following vaccination: Per another regional media report from Dibrugarh, Assam, June, 2019, a father was looking to sell his kidney to gather funds for treating his son who suffered a brain stroke following polio vaccination. 12. Death following vaccination: In 2009, a city court acknowledged death following polio vaccination, ordered the Delhi government to pay compensation of Rs. 2 lakh. 13. Court acknowledged polio vaccine as the cause of paralysis and ordered regional government to pay compensation: In 1996 a child became paralyzed following polio vaccine. After 25 year legal battle which included intervention by Supreme court, court has ordered health department to compensate victim with Rs 42 lakhs. 14. Polio from vaccine: Polio from vaccinations continue to occur. These are called VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis) and classified as non-polio. An estimated 3% of AFP cases are VAPP per one study. 15. GBS (Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) from the oral polio vaccine: GBS (Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a documented side effect of the Oral Polio vaccine and accounts for close to half of the AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) cases. #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles #IndiaFightsPolio #UncomfortableFacts @drkohilathas @P_McCulloughMD @naomirwolf @ChildrensHD @RobertKennedyJr @stopvaccinating @uTobian @forrestmaready @BusyDrT @mercola @dockaurG @mansukhmandviya @MoHFW_INDIA @narendramodi @myogiadityanath @OpenVAERS @JoshWalkos @MinorityView @sayerjigmi @HealthRanger Sources in thread below.
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Did you know? In the 1930s, 2 separate polio vaccines were made available in US, one by Dr. Maurice Brodie (killed virus) and the other by Dr. John Kolmer (attenuated). Both vaccines were discontinued following reports of 12 cases of paralysis following vaccination, including 6 deaths. In the modern context, once can argue that we have documented side effects orders of magnitude higher than the above, but still polio vaccines continue to be mass administered. #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles https://archive.org/details/lesserharmsmoral0000halp/page/n9/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.116854/page/n1075/mode/2up?view=theater https://archive.org/details/sim_american-journal-of-public-health_1936-02_26_2/page/116/ https://archive.org/details/sim_science-news-us_1935-01-05_27_716/page/6/mode/2up?q=kolmer+brodie+polio+vaccine
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Given issues with OPV (Oral Polio Vaccine), should India used IPV (injectable polio vaccine) instead? Answer: No There was enough information available in the late 1950s, early 60s itself to suggest that IPV (also called Salk vaccine) was ineffective or had low effectiveness, did not prevent transmission, and could potentially cause paralysis #WorldPolioDay https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rr/578260 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2555377/pdf/bullwho00330-0012.pdf https://everlyreport.com/the-truth-about-the-polio-vaccines-chicago-tribune-archives/ https://archive.org/details/sim_jama_1957-11-09_165_10/page/1336/mode/2up?view=theater
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
@awakenindiamov - awakenindiamovement
Follow this thread to know more about the truth of the #polio #vaccines
@AnhoneeRahasya - अनहोनी रहस्य
अगर किसी अभियान की असफलता की निशानी को चुपचाप दफ़ना दिया गया है तो वह अभियान सफल ही नज़र आएगा। https://youtu.be/soaEm11jxbA
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Based on the below studies, about 3.3% to 3.7% of the annual reported AFP (acute flaccide paralysis) cases are VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyeltis). This implies that over the period 2000 - 2022, somewhere between 27,000-33,000 children below the age of 15 suffered from vaccine induced polio or VAPP. So while polio is considered eradicated, we estimate that 10s of thousands of children actually suffered vaccine induced polio which India obediently classifies as non-polio https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.063 https://mansapublishers.com/index.php/ijch/article/view/550/481 AFP data source: https://extranet.who.int/polis/public/CaseCount.aspx
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
"No efforts have been made to find the causes for high incidence of vaccine failure and VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis)." - Dr. Yash Paul (former member, Polio Eradication Committee, Indian Academy of Pediatrics) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15532129/
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
India: The illusion of polio eradication. One chart says it all. #WorldPolioDay #WHOQuitIndia
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Consumption of the pesticide DDT declined by ~68% from 1980 to 1995. Coincidentally, polio incidence declined by ~80%. Subsequently, mass vaccination campaigns, also called PPI (pulse polio immunizations) were launched, and over the next decade some children received an unheard 25 doses leading to a massive spike in cases of acute flaccid paralysis (which pre-1997 would've been classified as polio). DDT data sources: https://ipen.org/sites/default/files/documents/POPs%20Country%20Situation%20report.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499664/ https://t.co/OMoUdG7eiX
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
2.5 billion US dollars was spent by Government of India from 1994-2012 for polio eradication. Was this money well spent, or an organized l👀t of national wealth, notwithstanding the tremendous toll on life & limb? ijme.in/articles/polio…
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
"large number of pesticides have been found to produce one or more of the following problems in animals: cancer congenital deformities, liver damage, kidney damage, vomiting, ulcers, cholinesterase inhibition, deliterious effects on the central nervous systems, sterility, leukaemia, convulsions" "There have also been newspaper reports[49] of pesticides producing giddiness and epilepsy in workers. Praful Bidwai[50] has also reported cases of cancer, stunted growth, deformities, and blindness caused by pesticides" "There is a significant statistical cor- relation between the technologies involved in the green revolution and prevalence of the following disabilities in India: amputations, dysfunction of joints, deformities, and visual disabilities" "Some evidence exists that pesticides can cause deformities of limbs and visual disabilities in humans even when taken in low doses" https://www.jstor.org/stable/4376844
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
In these threads we argue that as per the traditional pre-1997 definition in India, disorders such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Transverse Myelitis (TM), Bell's palsy/facial palsy, traumatic neuritis, sciactic never mononeuropathy, Post injection Palsy (PIP) are all polio. Many of the above are also side effects of vaccines and/or injections. https://t.co/zL95wHHJZ3 https://t.co/zrRhjVxxDN https://t.co/cDeYAszL03 https://t.co/t4VmGzTvH0
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) = Polio? “cases of Guillain-Barré’s disease are classified as atypical poliomyelitis” https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(47)90007-7 Brown, J. R., & Baker, A. B. (1947). The diagnosis of Guillain-Barré’s disease. The American Journal of Medicine, 2(1), 45–52.
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Transverse Myelitis = Polio? According to this 1914 book titled “A Manual of Infantile Paralysis” transverse myelitis was described as variation in the usual spinal type of poliomyelitis https://archive.org/details/manualofinfantil00frauiala/page/148/mode/2up?q=landry's A Manual of Infantile Paralysis, with Modern Methods of Treatment.
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
Bell's palsy = Polio? In an article in the Journal of American Medical Association in 1941, poliomyelitis was classified into 8 types, of which type VI was labeled as facial paralysis typical of “Bell’s Palsy findings” https://archive.org/details/sim_jama_1941-07-26_117_4/page/270/mode/2up The Journal of the American
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
The Other Side of India's Polio Eradication Story - A presentation by India's Forgotten Babies 0:00 to 0:37: Introduction 0:38 to 2:06: Official Storyline 2:07 to 9:22: Storyline - The unbiased view 9:23 to 12:32: Main causes/triggers of polio pre-1997 12:33 to 19:06: Was polio eradication about reducing incidence of acute flaccid paralysis? 19:07 to 21:04: Side Effects deliberately hidden by “silent majority” 21:05 to 22:43: Coercion to vaccinate 22:44 to 27:07: Vaccine failure ignored? 27:08 to 29:44: 25 doses? What about safety? 29:45 to 40:03: Adverse Events - Media Reports 40:04 to 43:26: Should OPV be replaced with IPV? 43:27 to 45:43: Conclusion Follow India's Forgotten Babies Link: https://t.me/IndiasForgottenBabies and the below handles @vratesh_ @AnhoneeRahasya
Video Transcript AI Summary
The presentation offers a counter view to the mainstream narrative that polio has been eradicated in India. It begins by outlining the official timeline: in 1988, India joined a global commitment to eradicate polio by 2000; India conducted pulse polio immunization drives starting in 1995; officially in 2011 India recorded zero polio cases, and in 2014 the World Health Organization confirmed polio eradication in India. An alternate view is then presented by examining definitions and data.
Definition and data issues: the definition of polio changed after 1996. Before 1996, polio cases were diagnosed clinically by physicians; after 1996, India adopted WHO guidelines relying on diagnostics and tests, including detecting polio viruses in stool specimens. In 1997, the definition changed. If a consistent definition is applied (the “old definition” line in a graph), polio was not eradicated but renamed; clinically compatible cases not meeting the WHO criteria were counted as nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP). Using the WHO definition, polio would appear eradicated, but with a consistent definition, AFP cases rose after 2003–2004, despite intensive pulse polio campaigns. Doctor Yashpal, a former member of India’s polio eradication committee, is cited: up to 1996, all reported AFP cases were labeled as polio; CDC is said to have confirmed that pre-1997 polio cases were reported by attending physicians with no standard case definition. The result is described as deception if one uses a consistent definition.
Age and incidence: post-1997, AFP tracking focused on children 15 years and under; cases in older individuals may not be counted, implying higher numbers could exist across all ages.
Causes and triggers of polio before 1997: literature notes two major factors. First, intramuscular injections were implicated in triggering a large share of paralytic polio cases (about 67% of paralytic polio). Second, there is a strong correlation between DDT/insecticide use and polio incidence: DDT consumption declined from 12.5 tons in 1980 to 4.4 tons in 1996, and agricultural DDT use peaked in 1978 and was banned in 1989; polio cases declined 1980–1996, aligning with reduced DDT use. This is presented as evidence that injections and environmental poisonings contributed to clinically compatible polio cases, complicating the eradication narrative.
Vaccination campaigns and side effects: the narrative asserts that a large majority of polio cases were vaccinated, with many children receiving multiple doses. Data cited include 60–73% of the eligible population vaccinated; in 2007–2009, 96% of polio cases had four or more doses, and in 2007, 85% had seven or more doses. It is argued that the vaccine itself can cause polio (labeled as non-polio CNS conditions) and that vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis and other adverse events occurred but were hidden from the public to boost vaccination uptake. There are references to nine AFP cases with immunization data, including one child with 15 doses and another with 25 doses; associations between oral polio vaccine and conditions like GBS, transverse myelitis, and facial paralysis are acknowledged.
Safety and policy critiques: the OPV dosing schedule reportedly increased from the original three doses to seven, ten, and even up to 25 doses in India by 2006; the safety of such extensive dosing is questioned, with the Indian Medical Association cited as expressing concerns. Poliol’s 2017 study reportedly found a strong association between AFP incidence and cumulative vaccine doses. Gagandeep Kang (2017) is cited criticizing the adverse events following immunization (AEFI) system as inadequate, reviewing only about 100 cases per meeting across four meetings annually.
Policy recommendations and conclusions: arguments against continuing polio vaccination include a lack of evidence of benefit and evidence of harm; calls for a road map for justice for vaccine victims and families for informed-consent violations and coercion; a call to review all vaccinations beyond polio; and a proposal to exit WHO and international pandemic treaties, asserting that sovereign nations should not follow the dictates of unelected global organizations.
Additional context includes media reports of adverse events and compensation for vaccine victims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other side of India's polio eradication story, a presentation by India's forgotten babies. This presentation is about polio eradication narrative in India. It is widely believed that polio has been eradicated in India, and this presentation presents a counter view to the mainstream narrative about polio eradication in India. Let's start by taking a look at the official narrative about polio eradication in India. For that, we need to go back in time to 1988 when over a 160 countries had made a commitment to eradicate polio globally by the year 2000, and India was one of those 160 countries that had made the commitment.
In order to meet this commitment, India ran a number of pulse polio immunization drives starting in 1995. And over the period of the next sixteen years, officially in 2011, India had recorded zero polio cases. And by 2014, World Health Organization confirmed that polio was officially eradicated in India. So India is considered to have been free of polio since 2011 and to have been officially declared by World Health Organization to be free of polio in 2014. Now let's take a look at an alternate view to this narrative.
In order to assess whether the narrative of polio eradication in India and the assertion that polio no longer exists is actually true or not, we need to start with the definition of polio and ask ourselves if there is a consistent definition of polio over, you know, over a period of time. When we look at how polio has been defined, what is evident is that the definition of polio actually changed after 1996. Prior to 1996, polio cases were diagnosed clinically by physicians, by doctors, but after 1996, India chose to adopt a new definition of polio based on WHO's guidelines, which was driven by diagnostics and tests. So there were two or three conditions that were required to be met in order to identify a confirmed case of polio. And one of the main conditions was that polio viruses had to be detected in stool specimens of a suspected polio case.
That was the change in definition after 1996, whereas prior to 1996, polio cases were diagnosed by physicians based on, clinical criteria. So what is evident is that in 1997, the definition of polio changed. Now why is this important? It is important because if we apply a consistent definition over a period of time, which is this dark orange line in this graph, if we apply the consistent definition, which is which is labeled as old definition in this graph, what is clear is that polio was not eradicated. It was simply renamed.
So if there was a clinical if there was a case that was clinically compatible with polio, but not consistent with the criteria that was laid out by WHO, which was primarily driven by diagnostics and tests or by virological examinations. If a clinically compatible case was not consistent with the parameters that were laid out in WHO's definition, it was not counted as a poll case of polio. It was counted as a case of nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis. What that meant was if we use WHO's definition, then one can argue that polio was eradicated. But even that argument is actually smoke and mirrors because if we use the traditional definition, the cases of acute flaccid paralysis or what was known as polio before 1997 actually skyrocketed.
And you'll notice this, period after 2003 or 2004 where it, where polio cases actually went up manifold. And this was the time period where, up in the pretty intensive pulse polio immunizations were carried out. And this is this was in 2004, four or five nations, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and Nigeria, had committed that, they are going to eradicate polio as part of global polio eradication initiative. These were the only four or five countries at that time where polio was endemic. So around 2004, after making that commitment, a series of polio eradication tries were carried out, and we can see that there was a rise in acute flaccid paralysis cases, which pre 1997 used to be called polio.
So this is what has been labeled as the unbiased view on this graph, that if we use a consistent definition, we don't go by the smokes and mirrors of diagnostics, polio cases actually polio actually never got eradicated. In fact, after 2004, it skyrocketed. And as far as the contention goes that is it true that the definition changed? This has been confirmed by doctor Yashpal, who was a former member of India's polio eradication committee. He minced no words when he mentioned in one of his write ups that up to 1996, all reported cases of acute flaccid paralysis were labeled as polio.
An organization no less than CDC has confirmed that all polio cases report before reported before 1997 were confirmed by attending physicians with no standard case definition. No standard case definition. That is the key. So what is the picture that one gets when one uses a consistent definition of polio? The picture is that of deception.
If an assertion is being made that polio got eradicated, That simply isn't true when one applies a consistent definition. Lastly, it's important to note that post 1997, AFP or acute flaccid paralysis cases were being tracked only for children who were 15 years and under. So anybody who was older than 15 years who who was a clinically compatible case of polio, that particular case is not counted in this graph, so these numbers are probably even higher if we include all age groups. What were the main causes and triggers of polio before 1997? That is before the before the change in definition of polio when polio was, clinically diagnosed.
If one goes to the literature, two things stand out. One is that sixty seven percent or almost two in every three cases of paralytic polio were actually triggered by intramuscular injections, and there are a series of studies, from the nineties and from the eighties that that show almost every single one of them shows that all the cases that were presenting as paralytic, the paralytic form of polio, right, and polio is considered a central nervous system disorder, so almost two in every thirty three cases or sixty seven percent of the paralytic forms of polio cases. In such cases, the intramuscular injections were triggers for polio. The second thing that stands out is, the, the strong correlation between consumption of DDT, which is an insecticide, and, the incidence of polio. So if we go through the consumption pattern of DDT for India, from the late seventies up until the mid nineties, we'll observe that the consumption of DDT declined by about 65% from 12.5 tons in 1980, to about 4.4 tons in 1996, And what is equally important to observe is that the, the use of DDT in agriculture, which had peaked to about 4.7 tons in 1978, That use of DAT in agriculture was actually banned in 1989, and all these time periods are important because between 1980 and 1996 polio cases declined by eighty two percent, and the the deceleration or the decline in polio incidence was triggered actually, or it it is very noticeable since the late eighties up until the mid to late nineties, which was the time when there was a pretty significant decline in the use of DDT.
So two things that seem to have triggered cases of polio or at least cases that are clinically compatible with polio using the modern definition. Two things stand out, one was intramuscular injections and the other was the use of DTT. If we go back to the narrative around polio eradication in India, often, you will hear that polio has been eradicated in India, and the proof of that lies in the fact that we don't see too many cases of children, especially suffering from, paralysis, which is kind of, you know, paralytic polio. I mean, those were the images that were shown, during the polio vaccination campaign days where that basically suffering from polio was indication of paralysis where, the limbs are immobilized for example, and the picture that was created was that polio immunization campaigns are actually reducing the incidence of flaccid paralysis or acute flaccid paralysis, but this is far from the truth. We've already demonstrated that cases of acute flaccid paralysis actually skyrocketed after the intensive intensification of pulse polio immunization campaigns, and a person no less than doctor T Jacob John, who was the chairman of polio eradication committee, he made the statement that what is under eradication.
He's on record making the statement by the way. He said that what is under eradication a wild poliovirus is not the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis. Therefore, the criteria for eradication is the absence of polioviruses from stool specimens. In other words, officially, while, unofficially or, through through media campaigns, people were made to believe that what was under eradication was paralysis due to polio. What was actually under eradication was, wild polio viruses from the stool specimens, which seems to have little to do with the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis.
Now in this chart on the in this slide on the left, you will see an example of Nepal. If you look at Nepal's, AFP numbers, acute flaccid paralysis numbers in 1998 and 1999, you'll see that there was a threefold increase in acute flaccid paralysis cases from 1998 to 1999, but at the same time, there was a decrease of forty percent in the incidence of poliomyelitis cases. So how is it possible that while acute flaccid paralysis went up threefold, the incidence of polio almost halved, and the secret to that lies in the number of the percentage of suspected polio cases that were tested in the lab where the stool specimens were available. So in 1998, stool specimens were available only for thirty five percent of the suspected polio cases, whereas in 1999, stool specimens were available for seventy nine percent of the suspected polio cases, which means that higher the number of stool specimens, lower the number of confirmed polio cases. And this has shown up in study after study.
So if we go all the way back to 1956, there was a study of, polio incidents in Washington Washington State and United States, and there they found that in, out of two hundred and fifty suspected cases of polio, the virus was found in only fourteen percent or fourteen point eight percent of the stool specimens. So that's one in every six cases of suspected polio, the virus was detected through laboratory methods. And there are if one goes back to and reads the literature from the late forties and fifties, there are multiple people who say that virological tests alone do not, cannot be used to rule out a case of polio. This is a very, very important assertion that you cannot use virological tests alone to rule out a case of polio. In fact, it can be argued that is virus the sole cause of polio or even a necessary precondition for the existence of polio disease given the fact that polio is triggered by intramuscular injections, given the fact that polio is triggered by environmental poisoning due to DDT and other insecticides.
Can one say with confidence that virus is the sole cause of polio? If virus is not the sole cause of polio and if virological examinations are not enough to rule out polio, why was it that virological examination of stool specimen is what was relied on to count a polio case after 1996. What is important to understand in this entire process is that this vaccination campaign that was carried out over several years in India, where millions of children were vaccinated multiple times, There is no evidence to suggest that this examination was carried out or rather this immunization was carried out to reduce the incidence of paralysis, flaccid paralysis. One of the most glaring aspects of India's polio eradication program is the fact that certain well known side effects were deliberately hidden from the masses. People were not warned about the side effects.
Parents were not warned about these side effects, and campaign after campaign with the full blessings of influencers actually seemed to indicate that this was a risk free option. Vaccination was a risk free option for for the target population, which was the children. But if we look at the literature, there are several instances where doctors, who were, involved in this polio eradication campaign openly admit that they know about a condition known as vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis, which is a side effect of the polio vaccines. Doctors knew about this. The WHO knew about this, the UNICEF knew about this, but this fact was deliberately deliberately hidden from the masses in order to ensure maximum vaccination uptake.
The fact that the vaccine itself can cause polio was hidden from the masses in order to ensure maximum vaccination uptake. This is a clear violation of informed consent, and the question needs to be asked as to whether an illegal act was cons illegal act played out because informed consent was suppressed. Not just was important information hidden from the masses, hidden from the parents, On top of that, the public health authority authorities actually doubled down. The bureaucrats doubled down by literally coercing people to vaccinate their children. On this slide, there's an example that is shown, which was published in one of the journals by doctor Yashpal, where there was a parent who refused to vaccinate his child with the polio vaccination, and the price that he paid as a result of his refusal was that his ration was canceled and power supply was disconnected, and he was used as an example for others that others would have to pay the same price if they did not vaccinate their children.
So this is the kind of coercion which is clearly illegal because vaccination is voluntary, But this is the kind of coercion that played out on top of the unethical act of withholding side information relate side of information of side effects of the polio vaccine. The other piece of information that is often ignored is that a huge majority of the polio cases were actually vaccinated, and they were vaccinated with multiple doses. So to to think that a medical product can eradicate a disease despite the fact that a vast majority of those who are actually suffering from the disease are vaccinated is, that circular reasoning. And in on this slide, we show that despite the fact that an estimated sixty seven to seventy three percent of the eligible population was vaccinated, if we look at the numbers from 2007 to 2009, ninety six percent of the polio cases had received four or more doses of the vaccine. And in 2007 itself, eighty five percent of the polio cases had received seven or more doses of the polio vaccine.
So clearly, it appears as if there was a disproportionately high incidence of polio in the vaccinated cases. Why was this failure of the efficacy of the vaccine ignored? Why wasn't it looked at more deeply? We have to think about it. We have to look at this information in the backdrop of the fact that the vaccine itself can cause polio, which is labeled as non polio, so it doesn't even show up in these numbers that are shown in this table here.
So the vaccine caused polio, which is labeled as non polio, is a side effect, which was hidden from the masses. We will show in a subsequent slide that the vaccine can also cause other polio like illnesses such as transverse myelitis and Guillain Barre syndrome or GBS. And polio itself when it came to the incidence of polio itself, a very, very high percentage of the cases were vaccinated. On the basis of this, would it be reasonable to suggest that this vaccination campaign was a success? The other important thing to notice here is that not just a very high percentage of polio cases were vaccinated, but a very high percentage of acute flaccid paralysis cases seem to have been vaccinated, at least based on some of the anecdotal pieces of evidence here.
So on this chart, for example, there are nine cases of acute flaccid paralysis that are listed, out of which, immunization data was available for eight. In two cases, there was a residual paralysis, and in both these cases, the number of vaccine doses received was extraordinarily high. So in one case, in one case of acute flaccid paralysis, the child had received 15 doses of the vaccine, and another case of acute flaccid paralysis, the child had received an astonishing 25 of the vaccine. And we know from published research that there is some association between the oral polio vaccine and, specific conditions of acute flaccid paralysis such as GBS transverse myelitis and facial paralysis. So we know we now know that the vaccine itself can cause polio, which is labeled as nonpolio.
A high percentage of polio cases were vaccinated. A high percentage of acute flaccid paralysis cases were vaccinated. On what basis can we say that the vaccination program was a success? The vaccine that was administered in India is called the oral polio vaccine, and it was invented by doctor Albert Sabin, and the original dosage schedule of this vaccine was three doses that was used in the developed world. In cases of tropical country like India, it was found that three doses are not effective, so the dosage was increased gradually to seven doses, and it was reported that seventy million children in India in 2006 had received as many as ten doses, and many children had received of an astonishing twenty five doses.
The question is, when the original dosage schedule was three doses, and that was increased to five to seven to ten and then to twenty five, What about the side effects or the negative impact of giving so many doses? Was there ever a safety study that was done? And, it's really, really hard to find any safety study or any study to suggest that so many doses of the polio vaccine were actually safe. In fact, the Indian Medical Association had raised concerns about giving an indiscriminate number of doses, as per an article in the Times of India in 2006. And in that article, the journalist had suggested that the government was ignoring concerns of the Indian Medical Association.
There was a very important piece of research that was done by doctor Poliol, which was published in 2017, that showed a very strong association between the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis and the cumulative number of doses. So, clearly, the only inference one can make is that this vaccination program probably caused a lot of suffering and misery. In 2017, doctor Gagandeep Kang, who's a former member of NTAGI, the national technical advisory group on immunizations in India, she was quoted as saying that the adverse events falling immunization system in India is inadequate because only hundred only, only four hundred cases of adverse events are reviewed every year, hundred per meeting. So there are four meetings that are held, and in each meeting only 100 cases are reviewed, which is astonishingly low given the thousands of adverse events that are reported. So long story short, the adverse events or the AFI system, the adverse events following immunization system in India was less than adequate, and it was not capturing anything close.
It was likely not capturing anything close to the actual number of adverse events or and the actual number of serious adverse events that were happening on the ground. Now on this slide, we've listed a few media reports about adverse events following polio vaccination. There's a report about a death that had occurred, and then there are a couple of reports about compensation that was paid to, vaccine victims or the families of vaccine victims following death or following, paralysis, due to the vaccination or in days following the vaccination when such adverse events took place. So there were media reports about that. And in the following slides, we are going to play three media reports of incidences such as loss of eyesight, acute flaccid paralysis, and brain stroke following vaccination.
Some of the authorities in India have argued that the oral polio vaccine should be replaced with the IPV or injectable polio vaccine. This is what was done in much of the developed world, and India should follow the same path. So the question is, should OPV be replaced with IPV, the injectable polio vaccine? And the argument that is made in this particular slide has started, no, it should not. And there are three primary reasons why it shouldn't.
There's a scientific case against IPV, there's an ethical case against IPV, and there's a financial case against IPV. The scientific case is, in order to understand the scientific case, we have to go back to the 1950s when the injectable polio vaccine was first rolled out, and it was found there were multiple reports about its lack of effectiveness, the fact that it did not prevent transmission, and it also had side effects. There was a case study of paralysis following the Salk vaccine, then there was the infamous Qatar incident. So as per a study in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization in 1960, it was acknowledged that the the inactivated vaccine had very, very limited effectiveness and because of which repeated revaccination was necessitated. So that's the scientific case.
Then there's an ethical case. IPV is being recommended by the same authorities who had recommended OPV. And as we've argued in this presentation, OPV has caused a lot of damage. So the fact that the same entities who had recommended OPV are recommending IPV, one can argue that there's a major trust deficit there, and therefore, whether the suggestions of the same entities were involved in architecting the oral polio vaccination program, whether the same entity should be trusted or not. That is a big question, big question mark.
And lastly, there's a financial case against IPV. So according to doctor Pollyol's report, between 1994 and 2012, India spent 2,500,000,000 US dollars, on the vaccination programs. Based on the presentation done, based on this presentation, it can be argued that that was not money well spent. And, therefore, to continue to, to continue with the vaccination program would be, further strain on the financial resources without any benefit. In fact, as we've argued, it's likely caused a lot of harm.
To conclude, there are these four points that we would like to make. One, there is a very strong case for ending all ongoing polio vaccinations because there's no evidence of benefit, and there is evidence of a fair amount of harm. Secondly, there needs to be a road map for justice for vaccine victims and their families given the fact that in the principle of informed consent was violated, given the fact that there was coercion. There has to be a road map for justice for vaccine victims and their families and for every single person who was misinformed and misled by the vaccination program. The third piece recommendation here is that there needs to be a thorough review of all vaccinations, not just the polio vaccine.
The polio vaccine was the largest vaccination drive in India prior to the COVID nineteen vaccines, but there are several other vaccines that are that have made it to the immunization schedule on the advice of the same entities, that pushed forth the polio vaccination program. So therefore, there's a very strong need to review all vaccinations. And lastly, there is a strong case to be made to exit World Health Organization and all any international pandemic treaties, given the fact that what was observed in the polio vaccination program and more recently in the COVID vaccination program was the obsession to meet vaccination targets at the cost of bodily autonomy and informed consent. So this is a very, very important factor that one needs to think about is, why should a sovereign nation actually follow the dictat of unelected, unaccountable so called global organizations.
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
https://vratesh.substack.com/p/the-other-side-of-indias-polio-eradication https://t.co/40vCFrVqZ2
@vratesh_ - Vratesh Srivastava
@drkohilathas @awakenindiamvmt @awakenindiamov https://vratesh.substack.com/p/the-other-side-of-indias-polio-eradication https://t.co/7zgq659nRT
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
unroll @threadreaderapp
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement
For the vaccine bubble to burst, and innocent children to be saved from devastating consequences, it is important to understand the decades' claim that vaccines have eradicated diseases or reduced incidence of specific diseases is a LIE. One of the most important tools to keep this lie going is to simply rename the disease to something else, from polio to acute flaccid myelitis for example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8CdECxzryI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The segment highlights a growing concern about acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a mysterious paralysis affecting children. Doctors and parents are on high alert as more cases are identified nationwide. The report notes that NBC News contacted health departments and found that, so far this year, there are at least 84 AFM cases under investigation across 25 states. The condition has been monitored by NBC News since 2014, and the program emphasizes that the majority of children affected continue to experience some element of disability or weakness even four years after onset.
The coverage includes a personal perspective from families affected by AFM. Three-year-old Carter Roberts, who was diagnosed two years prior to the segment, is described as a tough child, but like about half of the children with AFM, he never fully recovered. Carter died three weeks before the broadcast, and his mother uses his story to caution other parents to stay vigilant for potential AFM symptoms.
Witness accounts and medical guidance in the report underscore the seriousness of AFM symptoms. Parents are urged to be vigilant for signs such as arms or legs that aren’t working, a floppy or weak-looking head, or respiratory symptoms that don’t align with typical illnesses. The program stresses that AFM is rare, but the appearance and spread of cases have prompted an urgent search for answers about why the condition is occurring more frequently and how it spreads.
The segment repeats the core message from medical professionals: AFM can be a devastating condition with lasting consequences for many children, and public health officials are actively investigating its causes and patterns of transmission. Doctor John Torres contributes to the reporting, framing the ongoing investigation and the national concern around the condition.
The report closes with a call to stay informed and aware, reinforcing that AFM remains a topic of concern for families and clinicians alike as investigators seek to understand its etiology, trajectory, and potential preventive measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, doctors and parents on alert as more children across the country are developing a mysterious paralysis called acute flaccid myelitis.
Speaker 1: It might always stay like this. She might never regain full recovery of her arms.
Speaker 0: NBC News reached out to health departments across the country and learned that so far this year, there are at least eighty four cases being investigated in 25 states.
Speaker 2: So we've been following children with this condition since 2014. The majority continue to have some element of disability or weakness even four years out from onset.
Speaker 1: If this can happen to our family, it can happen to anyone.
Speaker 0: We met three year old Carter Roberts two years ago, just weeks after he was diagnosed. He strikes me as a tough kid. But like half of the children with AFM, Carter never recovered, and three weeks ago, he passed away. His mother now warning all parents to be aware of the symptoms.
Speaker 1: Be vigilant in looking out for, you know, arms or legs not working, that floppy head, those respiratory symptoms that don't seem, you know, consistent with other basic illnesses.
Speaker 0: Tonight, an urgent search for answers to why this rare disease is spreading. Doctor John Torres, NBC News. Hey, NBC News fans. Thanks for checking out our YouTube channel. Subscribe by clicking on that button down here, and click on any of the videos over here to watch the latest interviews, show highlights, and digital exclusives.
Thanks for watching.
@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu
Polio has not been eradicated even in the West. It’s called ‘polio like illness’ or ‘acute flaccid myelitis’ (AFM). All these cases used to be classified as polio b4 the introduction of the polio vaccines. @DrJBhattacharya please research more…. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna922011 https://t.co/yqBbhI4sKT
@Glenn_Diesen - Glenn Diesen
Alex Krainer: Ceasefire in the US-Iran War Is Over — Trump Is Trapped & Defeated https://youtu.be/E_wNsHwWYyk https://t.co/XboWSfabaT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex Kraner and Glenn discuss the evolving Iran crisis, U.S. strategy, and broader implications for Europe and the global order.
- The Trump administration’s approach to the Iran confrontation is characterized as reactive and ad hoc. Alex suggests the administration has a “thoroughly thought through strategy of making it up as they go along,” operating in a reactive mode as ground conditions change and new opportunities arise. He asserts the conflict is one the U.S. went into that “created the problems that they're trying to solve now,” leaving the U.S. in a weak position.
- On domestic optics and objectives, Trump appears to seek tangible, visible proof of success, needing to “humiliate Iran” or demonstrate a victory, but the complexity of the conflict makes a clean win difficult. Alex questions why the administration would proceed with such a path, given that Trump is due to visit China next week and may want to present stronger leverage at that meeting.
- The strategic implications of controlling the Strait of Hormuz are highlighted. If Iran maintains control, it could pressure neighboring countries to decouple from the U.S., reduce American influence, and even threaten U.S. bases and the dollar’s dominance in the region. Conversely, the U.S. cannot easily “go home” without relinquishing strategic positioning, which would undermine Western dominance in the region.
- The likely trajectory is escalation. The discussion notes a shift toward renewed or intensified violence, with potential further bombings and Iranian retaliation. There is a view that the U.S. is boxed into choosing between victory and defeat, with no middle ground if sanctions and regional pressure fail to resolve the crisis.
- The broader political calculus: the conflict is seen as intersecting with Israel’s regional posture and broader Middle East dynamics. There is concern that Israel’s actions and the broader alliance structure complicate any possible ceasefire, and that the ceasefire may already be off the table due to continued hostilities in Gaza and Lebanon.
- The economic and military balance is emphasized: the U.S. military is spread thin across multiple theaters, and analysts note that achievements on paper do not translate into decisive victory in the field against Iran, which is large, populous, and capable of sustained resistance.
- There is widespread skepticism about the likelihood of a favorable outcome for U.S. or Western objectives. Alex argues that conventional military instruments are unlikely to compel regime change in Iran, and he contends the U.S. has already “painted itself into a corner” with no credible face-saving exit.
- The discussion on Europe and NATO: Glenn and Alex discuss Europe’s response to the Iran conflict and its impact on Ukraine and Russia. They describe a new Joint Expeditionary Force (ten Northern European nations under British command) as a mechanism to confront Russia, signaling a potential shift toward a new European naval alliance aimed at harassing Russia’s northern maritime routes. This raises questions about why European NATO members would cledge their navies to a London-led command in a bloc that could escalate toward war with a nuclear power.
- London’s role in shaping Western policy is repeatedly highlighted. The speakers suggest that “all roads always end up leading to London,” pointing to the British establishment’s influence on Middle East policy, Israel, and Europe’s strategic posture. They argue that powerful financial or banking interests (the “cabal” or “banking cartel”) may exert outsized influence over political leaders, including Trump, Netanyahu, and British officials, sustaining a long-standing push for Middle East hegemony.
- The multipolar shift: both speakers emphasize that the world is moving away from unipolar American dominance toward a multipolar system with multiple power centers. They suggest that a sustainable peace would require acknowledging this distribution of power and adjusting strategies accordingly, rather than pursuing unilateral or hegemonic approaches.
- Final reflection: if the West pursues a multipolar settlement, it could avert the calamity of a broader, potentially nuclear confrontation. However, the speakers warn that the global struggle over power—between unipolar and multipolar orders—may still unfold in blood, fire, and broader geopolitical clashes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. We are joined again by Alex Kraner, a market analyst, author, and a former head fund manager. Thank you for coming back on the program.
Speaker 1: Thank you for the invite, Glenn. Good to be with you, and warm greetings to your audience.
Speaker 0: So, you know, we're barely into this new project freedom of The United States in which it was gonna open the straight over moose by force. This was gonna start on Monday. It, well, it failed on the first day. On the second day, Trump said, well, we're gonna put it on pause, and when he's asked to explain why, he now says, well, the Pakistanis asked us. And so this was apparently the reason, and now it seems that it might restart again as we see these American warships trying to go through the Strait Of Hormuz.
But we also have Marco Rubio saying that Epic Furious achieved its objectives. We're now it's being well, it's come to a conclusion in his words. But at the same time, he's insisting that the straight of our moves has to be opened, that this is not accepted. So but that's kind of the main reason why they can't declare victory and go home. So how do you make sense of what's happening at this moment?
Speaker 1: Well, it's it's apparent that the administration has a very thoroughly thought through strategy of making it up as they go along. And I think that they're just in the reactive mode now. So as things change on the ground or as new opportunities open up, they act without thinking too many steps ahead. It's clear that this is the war that never should have happened because it created the problems that they're trying to solve now. And I think that they're in a a weak position to solve them.
So they're reactive. And part of the part of the problem is that Trump doesn't get to walk away with credit, with any ability to credibly announce a victory. So he he still has to he still has to humiliate Iran, or he's trying to because he needs some kind of a tangible, visible proof that he has achieved these objectives, that he prevailed, that he won. I I I don't even understand why they're doing it this way since especially since next Thursday, he's due to visit China. And I wonder if this isn't some kind of a desperate attempt to go to China with better cards to play rather than going as a as a failed, defeated, lame duck president.
It's very hard to understand what the actual case is, but for sure we are very far from the situation stabilizing.
Speaker 0: It seems to me that Trump has this well, his goal was essentially trying to do a decapitation strike against Iran. Maybe he was helped to be talked into this, that it had a high success chance of success. But he always had the fallback option, essentially what he did in Yemen, you know, go in, do a bit of bombing. If it doesn't work, you can always just pull out and declare victory. It appears that the main problem here is, of course, he can't leave and declare victory without the Strait Of Hormuz because and this is something that Iran can't give up as this is essentially the source of Iranian security if it it can't go back to crippling sanctions and forever threats of war while The US bases in its neighboring countries.
So if you control straight over moves, you can essentially pressure those countries to decouple from The US, possibly disband the military bases, stop trading in dollars, even pay reparations, punish those countries who will still sanction Iran. I mean, there's a lot of Iran can do to increase its own security and standing in the region if it doesn't give up on Hormuz. But this also means without with the Strait Of Hormuz under Iran in control, that US Israeli dominance in the region is effectively over, so he can't go home. But the Iranians can't give this up. So what what are we looking at here?
How how can this war possibly come to an end?
Speaker 1: Well, it does appear that we're going into another escalation, which is horribly unfortunate. You know, before the war started, in in those last few days when when even I realized that it was going to happen, I wondered if Trump wasn't going to maybe do another token round of bombings. You know, kind of pre agreed, okay, we're gonna bomb you here. Please excuse us and evacuate anything sensitive to make it, you know, a fake essentially a fake war for domestic audiences, but light enough to where you could come back from it. Because previously to twenty eight February, The United States was in a position to really negotiate with the Iranians.
And the Iranians were kind of forthcoming, and they decided to open up Iran to the American businesses, which would have been a hugely important thing for Trump to to to have as a maybe not a spectacular Hollywood style demonstrable victory, but a real victory in that you've just gained access to the fifth richest nation in the world in terms of natural resources, with a 92,000,000 population, number five or six in the world in the number of engineers that they form and scientists. So what a great entry that could have been. And you could have kept that door open if you went with let's call it a token war. But instead, on day one, they go and they commit a war crime of killing 20 volleyball players and 168 school girls and killing Iran's spiritual leader. And then Trump getting up on stage and saying, well, we killed him.
He was one of the most evil people in history, which is complete nonsense, very dishonorable. And so now you cannot go back. It seems to me a particularly idiotic way to paint yourself into corners where you no longer have choices now. So now you have the choice of victory or defeat. That is, you have the choice of pursuing victory or defeat.
So if you ask me how this ends, my only answer can be that it ends in defeat of The United States because they cannot win militarily. Militarily, they cannot win. But at the same time, they have given themselves two mutually exclusive choices. Nothing in between, no gray zone. So I think in the end, you know, they might apparently they've already been bombing Iran overnight, few hours ago, and obviously Iran is going to retaliate.
So we're now into a new escalation. And in the end you know it's going to be The United States who defeats. They can talk about the most powerful military in the world all they want, but you know their most powerful military in the world is spread thinly across the whole world. In Europe, across 700 or 800 military bases, everything, they've been waging wars nonstop for the last quarter of a century. They've depleted their arsenals, they've exhausted their troops, and they are halfway around the world where they have to have very robust logistic chains to even maintain this war operations.
And so it's just as if, you know, Iran was due for a regime change since 2006 according to the, you know, neocon plans. And nobody dared to do it up until now. And there's a reason why they didn't, because it was a dumb thing to do. It was a dumb thing to attempt, and it had to wait for Donald Trump. Why he why he decided to do this?
I I cannot imagine because, you know, I watched about ten days, two weeks ago Tucker Carlson's monologue. And Tucker Carlson said that he's been talking to Trump about this for for the last ten years and that he was convinced that they were on the same page, that Trump perfectly well understood that this would have been a dumb thing to do, that going to Iran was wrong, that he was perfectly aware of the risks of going to Iran. He went and did it anyway, and he did it in a way that gives him no face saving way out. He himself made it so that he has no way out. And then he climbed up on the stage and owned it fully.
So I think that ultimately it's going to be a defeat of The United States. I can't imagine that the American troops are very thrilled about being sent into some sort of a meat grinder that they largely understand to be done for the sake of Israel, which is not that was not the deal, that's not what the American people voted for. So there's no public support for this either. So the whole thing is, I think, a very tragic, catastrophic blunder on his part. And then combined with his inability to concede defeat, to admit failure, and to walk away means that it's going to ultimate eviction of The United States from the region.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a good point. I mean, The United States does have the most powerful harm in the world, but as you said, when it's still organized around as if it would be still a collective hegemon, that is it's has to be in every single part of the world
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: It's stretched thin. This is the problem, I think, that in a multipolar world, you you can't be everywhere. You have to make adjustments. And if you don't prioritize anything, then well, you do have to prioritize something. Otherwise, you prioritize nothing.
And I think this is this is the problem it's put itself in. But besides this thinned out army, though, it's also the very specific, I guess, dynamic of this war against Iran that is opening up the Strait Of Hormuz, for example, it's Iran doesn't need a matching army to The United States. The the weapons it uses, be it mines or underwater drones or, you know, the the regular flying drones, I mean, these are cheap to make. They're easy. They can easily boost their industrial potential to build more underground.
And because the strait is so narrow, they don't need more advanced weapons to stop The US ships. I mean, so few drones and missiles, and it's it's blocked. So you can't really completely prevent Iran from having this capability. Furthermore, Iran is the sees this, I think, quite reasonably as an as an existential threat. I mean, the goal here is not just a regime change.
It's the destruction of Iran. So they they'll be willing to absorb any pain that America brings out then because the alternative is so much worse. But but this begs the question, what what what what could they possibly do in such a scenario? And I I I keep thinking that if The US gets desperate enough, it might, you know, either escalate, you know, into much more powerful weapons. At least Israel could drop a nuke.
But but even but if if the alternative is to deescalate, find some kind of a way of declaring victory and going home, it's it's not even the Strait Of Hormuz only. It's also, you know, solving the presence in in in the Gulf States and also the relationship with Israel. I I I mean, I I can't imagine Israel is permitting The US from getting distangled from this conflict. And I guess that's my other question to you is, is it possible even to extend the ceasefire? Because the Lebanon was supposed to be included in this.
I can't imagine the Israelis accepting that they should pull out of Israel out of Southern Lebanon. So how how do you see I mean, forget about peace, but even extending a ceasefire. Do you think there's any potential here?
Speaker 1: It seems that the ceasefire has already been broken. If if what I'm reading if what I'm reading in the news today, it's already off the table because The United States went and bombed several I think they bombed Kesham Islands, I think, and another one I forget exactly, but, you know, just scanning the news before we connected today, it seems to me that the ceasefire is already off the table. They might reestablish it in the future. With regards to Israel, I don't even know how to comment on it because it doesn't seem that we're dealing on a rational basis at all. You know, Israel apparently isn't capable of functioning without being at war.
So it doesn't matter what makes rational sense to do, they might even accept a ceasefire under duress but completely disregard it and just continue like they didn't agree to a ceasefire. They're still bombing people in Gaza, they're still bombing people in Lebanon, they're still brutalizing Palestinians in the West Bank, they're still talking about going to war against Turkey, they're still talking about Greater Israel. And it doesn't seem to me that any political faction is emerging that would say, Wait, stop, we can't continue this way, we're going to destroy ourselves. They're all harder, more, faster, and it seems to me like psychotic nation pressing on the accelerator of their own destruction. And by now even Israeli owned press is talking that everything's already been destroyed, that the country is over, that, you know, there's a ghost, there's an appearance, a Potemkin version of the country still there, but it's been gutted.
A very recent piece in the Harats is talking about it in the sense that all the decisions, all the developments are already completed. The country is no longer. And so I, you know, it's only a question of when do they get completely exhausted or when do their neighbors finally come together and go to a total war against Israel. I mean, not just exchange of missiles, but an actual ground war. And we've already seen first step because Hezbollah has taken certain areas and villages in Northern Israel from the Israelis.
And then when it comes to, you know, going back to the relative strength of the American military power, you would have thought, Glenn, that they learned something in Afghanistan or that they learned something about their ten years of trying to destroy Ansar Ally in Yemen. You know, in Afghanistan they were at war for twenty years, the most powerful military in the world, which was arguably a lot more powerful twenty five years ago than they are today when they went into Afghanistan. And they spent twenty years there, lost 4,000, 5,000 troops, destroyed the country completely and then they had to withdraw and turn it back over to the same Taliban that they wanted to take down. And then the same thing with the Houthis in Yemen. You would think that boasting about the biggest military power in the world could take that reality check of saying, yes, this all on paper looks very, very big, but there's problems.
There's logistical problems. There's, you know, you can't easily fight wars on the other side of the world when you have no popular support in the nation that you're trying to control. And now you're taking on Iran, which is orders of magnitude more powerful than either Ansara'ala or the Taliban in Afghanistan. It's a huge country, 92,000,000 people, very powerful army. Whatever you think you did with your bombing, I mean imagine that you launched, that you hit 10 or 15,000 targets across Western Europe.
What is that? It's a drop in the bucket. So whatever you think you destroyed is probably far from breaking the country and defeating it. So it's not going to happen. You know, many policy papers, many intelligence reports have been written on this subject, and they virtually all came to the same conclusion: this is a dumb thing to do.
And then in Trump's administration there were advisers around him who told him this is a dumb thing to do. So what did he do? He fired them, he removed them. And now it's a ship with a handful of officers determining what happens. And that means that anything is possible.
I think maybe a nuclear strike is not possible from The United States but it's possible from Iran sorry, from Israel. So I think that we're in some kind of chaotic stage of development and so anything is possible from day to day. But I think that the one thing that I would take off the table as a possibility is that Trump is just going to walk away, and that he's going to accept that Iran is now the new regional hegemon, and that The United States has to accept Iran's terms to conclude this conflict?
Speaker 0: I think that will be the the wisest thing, and also it would be consistent with the objectives, at least that The US set out last year, which is adjusting to a new international distribution of power. Because, you know, if we take a step back, it does appear that the most most of the the wars which are breaking out all of the world has a common denominator. That is it's, I guess, a struggle between two different world orders in because we're shifting. That is you have the unipolar world order where this you know, you have the global dominance of The US, which in which one doesn't have to make compromise, doesn't have to take into consideration the security concerns of others, and The US can impose itself. And that other where we have now, which is an actual international distribution of power, which has many centers of power in which the unipolar policies no longer work.
It it just seems like this is a common theme because, well, for example, with Iran, this is The US now. If it wants to solve this crisis, it can't try to fix it within that limited scope of still having unipolarity because it's there's no pathway anymore. So I think they have to, you know, take a step back and accept that there's a wider shift in the world. And, you know, you can say the same with the Israelis that this whole clean break strategy they had for the past thirty years, it was largely built around the idea that, you know, we we don't have to make compromise with countries. We don't have to make deals.
We'll just with the Americans behind us, we'll just impose ourself and dictate to others, essentially, you know, peace through force or, you know, as Nieto would say, peace through strength, but that also applies to the Europeans. I mean, if we wanna solve a crisis with the Russians, they only wanna look at it within the this prism of preserving the unipolar moment, which is, well, the Russians have to bow, the Russians have to capitulate, pay reparations. Essentially, NATO has to continue rolling forward towards Russian borders, and Russia should just accept that this is a force for good. So, again, I think none of these things conflicts can be resolved unless we recognize that the the distribution of power no longer permits for this. I don't care if people think it was a good time or a bad time.
It just it's it's not possible anymore. The the West is not dominant. It's not gonna happen. It's just the way the world is. But I think this is the problem.
They keep looking at it in this narrow way, that this is the only framework acceptable. The idea, for example, in Europe would have a collective security architecture that also recognizes the security of the largest state in Europe. This is, you know, this is blasphemy. It's treasonous to even suggest that in Europe, you will be smeared, I mean, it's it's there's no appetite. But I guess what I'm getting at is back in December '25, The United States recognized it with this new security strategy.
It seemed that the world does is becoming multipolar. Europe is declining, you know, also recognizing The US can't be everywhere. It should focus on the Western Hemisphere, possibly also East Asia, but but but but at least that would widen it. It would recognize the world we actually live in, and then suddenly, there would be many more opportunities to find a new status quo, which actually delivers peace and which, you know, one doesn't simply need to overwhelm an adversary, which can't be overwhelmed. But do this what do you think happened to Trump?
Because it looked like in 2025, he was leaning a bit in this direction, at least before June. You know, he was gonna get out of Ukraine. He wasn't gonna get involved in any more stupid Middle Eastern war. And now we're here. They're not getting out of Ukraine.
They're sending more weapons. They're not they're not getting out of Iran. They're gonna they're going going up the escalation ladder. So what do you think happened in America?
Speaker 1: I genuinely don't know, Glenn. I'm mystified. You know, the opinions the opinions about what happened cover practically all the whole range of possibilities. Some people say that Trump was always like this, he was just hiding his game, you know? He just came out of the closet as this globalist arch Zionist.
So I know if that's true or not. Some people say that he's been had in some way, you know, that somebody somehow got to him. I think that can be excluded either because, you know, we know that these globalist forces, which I Okay, so here's one thing that kind of mystifies me: that this drive to take total control of The Middle East and to take down Iran, it goes back to at least the first Bush administration. And we remember the Wesley Clark's whole revelation that in 2001 they were going to take seven countries down in five years and that Iran was last on that list, so it means that Iran was due for regime change by 2006. Okay, they never got there but the pressure on administrations to go to war against Iran was coming from somewhere.
And it seemed like it was coming from Israel. But we know that in 2019, the pressure on Trump to go to war against Iran was coming from the British side, from British embassy and their ambassador Sir Kim Dereck. And that turned out into a whole diplomatic incident which ended up that the Foreign Office in London had to recall Sir Kim Dereck and nominate a different ambassador. And this time around the pressure is coming from Netanyahu and from the Zionist cabal in The United States. So we have, you know, two different sources of power pushing for the same agenda, which to me suggests that there's a higher level of power which has decisive influence over both of those, meaning over Israel and over the British government and then ultimately over Trump as well in some way.
So part of this equation probably has to do with the fact that Israel, one of these sources of pressure, is the creation of the other source of pressure, the British establishment. Israel was created by the British Empire as the bridgehead intended to help them control the Middle East, its energy resources and the trade routes that were essential to control. So it seems to me that the big power we're talking about again is the banking cabal, high level banking cartel, and that they, you know, since they have a very powerful satellite on Wall Street, when push comes to shove, they are able to exert such powerful influence that whether Trump was on board with this or not and, you know, let's remember in 2019 he was not on board. And, you know, if you read Sir Kim Dereck's cables with the foreign office from 2019, they were extremely annoyed with him. But they also suggested that they would continue to exert pressure to, you know, flood the zone around Trump with Trump whisperers, and that next time some pretext happens, Iran does something that they could, you know, create outrage about, that they will be able to then tip Trump over.
And so maybe this is what happened, but I wouldn't exclude the possibility that this included threatening Trump or his family. And you know, if anybody thinks that that's a bridge too far, let's remember that they killed somebody assassinated John F. Kennedy and somebody assassinated Robert F. Kennedy. And we know that both John F.
Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy were not exactly Zionists, that they had a very adversarial relationship with Israel. So they wereand also John F. Kennedy wanted to destroy the CIA and so forth. So I think that obviously nobody was held accountable for that other than the long gunmen.
So what happened instead is that these structures of powers got away, scot free, for assassinating the president and his brother, who was the next presidential candidate. And they didn't lose power, they consolidated power, they became more powerful. So their ability to assassinate presidents didn't go away. But, you know, maybe they don't have to assassinate presidents, maybe they can tell him, 'Look, if you're not on board with us on this, we're going to start killing your family members, see how you like that.' I don't know. I think that that as a possibility cannot be eliminated and then, you know, if Trump is pushed into that as the commander in chief and the president of The United States, he has to own it.
He can't say: Oh well, you know, I'm the president of The United States but somebody else is pulling the levers and I'm just alone for the ride. Don't think we know the answer to any of these questions. But whatever it is, it's not Trump, meaning he's their errand boy, that's for sure, and he owns this mess. But ultimately, I think that whoever has been pushing this during the Clinton administration and George W. Bush administration and Obama administration and Biden administration and first Trump administration and now again is not the person that American people elected by mistake, it's a structure of power that's above the US president and the political class, above the British prime minister and British political class, and above Benjamin Netanyahu as well.
And I think that we can narrow it down so that it goes back to the city of London, to the people who control the city of London, and who have created the state of Israel. We know that, you know, back about a hundred years ago when we had the Balfour Declaration, that even before the Balfour Declaration, the establishment of the state of Israel was being discussed. And that the alumni of Alfred Milner's roundtable were giving statements to the media and saying, well, if the British Empire is going to continue as a dominant maritime empire around the world, we are going to have to seed that region by which they were meaning Eastern Mediterranean, the Palestine, with a particularly patriotic stock. And so that's what they did. And I don't think that they ever relinquished control of Israel.
And I think that these are the same forces that for the same reason, as they haven't been able to give up on the Middle East for over one hundred and twenty years, they will not be able to give up now. So, know, ceasefire, no ceasefire, this is going to have to go to the ultimate and total defeat of one side or the other. And I think that this time around it's going to be the imperial forces who are going to be defeated.
Speaker 0: I was gonna say, one doesn't even need to threaten to kill Trump. The Epstein files essentially takes care of much of this. But that that's an interesting you know, if you look at his statements of Trump over the past forty years, there's a contradiction in there, though. He's he keeps make he kept making the point that all of these forever wars were a big mistake. We should stay out of it.
We should start to stop finding people's wars. On the other hand, he's also arguing that America is always weak, you know, like, we we shouldn't allow Iran to do this. Why are allowing them to do that? So so how do you kinda square the circle? And it it seems that he often finds the solution as being, well, those leaders were simply weak.
You can achieve it by simply showing strength. And that that's kind of his main shtickto. That is he does the the maximum pressure, and this is often what what got him what he what he needed. My concern was always what happens when the maximum pressure meets another great power or a large power, at least, that's a fair for its existence. Because you can do maximum pressure against Russia, but it doesn't like he Trump noticed, it doesn't mean anything because if Russia sees themselves faced with an existential threat, they're gonna go all the way.
What happens when they do maximum pressure against Iranians? Well, they face an existential threat as well. They're gonna go all the way. So he kind of hit the wall, and then so what what do you do? Do you do you change the recipe for how you achieve success, or or do you go to war?
And I guess, you know, as you said, if he has enough Trump whispers around him saying how great he is, and how everyone will back away when his mighty army shows up, then perhaps, you know, he's has the narcissistic tendencies to buy into such an argument. I I I wanted to ask you a last question, which is how this Iran war is now affecting Europe's war, or or NATO's war, or or the NATO Russia war in Ukraine, because the Ukraine now the Iranian war has obviously taken a lot of resource away from Ukraine. The Americans are still sending weapons, but there's talks much talk about delays or simply weapons being diverted. So if The US has less capabilities and even intentions to commit to the war against Russia and Ukraine, it seems that the Europeans are then unless they're gonna have peace with Russia, which isn't on the table, they're gonna have to escalate. And we do some see some cases of this, and this is happening, of course, at a very sensitive time when The US protection of Europe is going away.
The and also Russia seems now determined to restore its deterrence by hitting back. So it's a very strange or dangerous time to escalate. And this is when we see now the Europeans, at least some European countries, The UK plus nine northern countries, forming this new naval block to confront Russia. I was wondering how how do you read this situation? Because if we are gonna end up in a massive war with Russia, with the Russians possibly launching a limited nuclear strike to restore its deterrent, I think this is going to be the most likely pathway now.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's a very interesting situation, Glenn. So this just happened days ago, on twenty third April, that the British representatives and the naval chiefs of 10 European nations signed the protocols for formation of the Joint Expeditionary Force, which is really interesting, because 10 Northern European nations are voluntarily putting their navies under British command, obviously with an intent to create a new military alliance aimed against Russia. So they intend to basically cut Russia off from its northern maritime routes And to harass Russia, they're already doing it, you know, aggressive boarding of Russian ships and inspections of ships suspected of circumventing sanctions or espionage or whatever. And so that is forcing Russians to respond. So they're sending apparently they're putting FSB linked security personnel on high value tankers, or they're sending submarines or frigates to accompany the ships.
And then that in turn, you know, the British are saying, oh, you know, the Russian incursions into our waters have been increasing. Well, yeah, because you're harassing them so the Russians are obliged to send military escorts with their cargo ships. And so then you say, oh look, they're making incursions into our waters. And so it's like an escalation escalator that is obviously coming instigating from London again. You know, this is a thing too.
So it seems to me that all roads always end up leading to London because this new joint expeditionary force, obviously crafted to antagonize Russia, is again of the British governing establishment with headquarters in London, with operational control in London, with a British general who is the top commander of this structure. They're not there yet, you know, because they have given themselves about four years to completelyhow do you say? To bring these forces in sync, meaning, you know, they still have different equipment, different electronic standards, different ammunitions and different types of weaponry. So they want to harmonize all this so that they can operate as one military unit. And that's going to be a process and an investment.
But again the mysterious aspect to this that needs to be explained is why would 10 European nations agree to put themselves at risk of war with a nuclear power and submit their navies to the control of a London based command and control center? Why did they agree to be led by a power that obviously has aggressive designs towards Russia? Why wouldn't any of these nations say, well, maybe it better serves our interest to find a way of cooperating with Russia, to have peaceful coexistence, that everybody could be safe and everybody could trade with one another and we can focus on developing our economies. And instead of that, they all sign up to an agenda that has very high risks of bringing them to a devastating war against the nuclear power. That is really difficult to explain.
Furthermore, all 10 of these nations are NATO members. They're already in a military alliance. Why do they need a new military alliance? Well, say it. And they say that, well, you know, we need to be more agile, we need to haveyou know, basically they don't want to deal with the whole NATO baggage and the bureaucracy they might inhibit their freedom to act.
So they created a new alliance, but if that alliance gets into trouble against Russia, then they're going to say like, Oh, we're NATO member nations, Article five, everybody has to now unite and go to war against Russia. So it's basically a tripwire but it's being done deliberately and it's taking the whole world to the precipice of World War III. And, you know, if you follow the breadcrumbs, it always ends up in London. So I think that, you know, we have to take that situation seriously. And they're also saying, you know, we need this because we need to bring the focus back from The Middle East to Russia because, you know, The Middle East may be Trump's obsession, but London is still primarily obsessed with Ukraine and Russia.
And they're losing there, so they need a second front. And, you know, it was meant to be Balkans. The war drive in the Balkans dissipated since Trump came into the White House, so now they're instigating it in the Baltics. But it's it's this cabal that is pushing us into World War three, and for the reasons that we discussed, you know, the their designs are essentially hegemonic. They will not give up, they will never give up.
They've been trying to take control of Russia for more than two hundred years and they never stopped. And so they will not stop again until one side or the other are completely defeated and destroyed.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think the possibly the reason why they were they're willing to essentially risk their own countries instead of pursuing basic national interest by by adjusting to the this new balance of powers because, yeah, this is not simply a war about whether or not, yeah, Krematorsk should be a part of Russia or Ukraine. You know, this is about a war it's a war about do you have a multipolar system or unipolar with collective hegemony? And I think if they can push back the Russians, then they'll have this powerful Ukrainian shield left in front of them. The Americans will return standing behind them, and this is the formula for collective hegemony.
And if if they begin to pursue common sense and trade and purse accept a new status quo, that that means, yeah, a new distribution of power. That means multipolar a system. It's not that different actually from Iran. It's not that different from the Americans ending the economic war against China, which they could both prosper if they cooperated, but that means they have to live next to China as an equal. And I don't think there's, again, I think this major struggle, like, what kind of world order, we're not really past this yet.
My prediction is gonna end you know, this new world will be end born in blood and fire and not not diplomacy, unfortunately so. I hope I'm wrong, though.
Speaker 1: Blood and fire and viruses, Glenn. That's coming. Virus.
Speaker 0: Well, interesting times or yeah.
Speaker 1: Working. Extremely. Yes.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Anyways, thanks a lot for coming on, Alex. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for the invite, Glenn. Take care. Bye bye.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall the gear my buddy tried to smuggle into the Giza Plateau to measure around the pyramids. A laser distance meter caused the biggest uproar; we nearly had the police called. They confiscated everything, but our Cairo host hid it with a relative. We got it back after stressing. We learned full photogrammetry with a regular camera, like the Dendera Temple staircase model I published.
@FoMaHun - Marcell Fóti 🪨
I’ve been meaning to show this for a long time. This was the gear my buddy tried to walk onto the Giza Plateau with so he could take measurements inside and around the pyramids. Yeah… that absolutely did not go over well. We almost got the police called on us. The thing that caused the biggest uproar was that green gadget — a laser distance meter. You can’t even imagine what light is capable of against granite and limestone! Absolutely nothing 🤣 The panic made zero sense. Then there were both our passports. I photographed them while they photographed them. They laid everything out, took pictures of it all… Privacy rights? What privacy rights? And after that, they tried to confiscate the equipment! For fuck’s sake! That green thing alone cost something like three hundred bucks! Luckily, our host had walked us to the entrance, and when they were about to confiscate everything, he stepped in, stuffed all the measuring instruments into a plastic bag, and took them to one of his relatives for safekeeping. He said, “No problem, I’ve got seven thousand relatives in Cairo” 🤪 We spent the whole day stressing over whether “safekeeping” meant permanently or whether we’d actually get the stuff back. We got it back! Every single piece! We stayed in Egypt for another four days after that, but we never again carried anything that even remotely looked like measuring equipment anywhere. What those geniuses don’t realize is that if they only let you bring in a regular camera, you can still do full photogrammetric measurements with it and create millimeter-accurate 3D models. That’s exactly how that famous 3D model of the staircase in the Dendera Temple of Hathor was made — the one I already published. Just with an ordinary camera.
@Americaman_Hero - Americaman
100% white European Dutch artist. I don't " call myself the Americaman" , americaman is a cartoon character I created. Not everything is a self insert. I know it's very difficult stuff to understand... https://t.co/mqY32Fyb7S
@ApexImperialist - Apex Imperialist
Daily reminder that the "Americanman" is from Indonesia and pretends to be from Singapore using a VPN. Of course, he claims to be "Dutch", but even if that were true, why would a man from the Netherlands call himself the "Americanman"? https://t.co/3BiCce9l5X
@Americaman_Hero - Americaman
reSee.it AI Summary
Two individuals recount a visit with Dan Bilzerian where guests were asked to leave phones in another room and were questioned about assassinating Israeli ministers. One claims he was invited to Dubai and Qatar but declined; the trip allegedly involved an ambush by the FBI. A corroborating account describes a room with a batting cage and similar questions about targeted individuals, hinting at a possible honeypot. A video of the room was later posted.
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
The first time I met Dan Bilzerian at his house, he had us put our phones in another room, then asked me how difficult it would be to assassinate Israeli government ministers. Then he invited me to Dubai and Qatar, which I declined. On his way there he was ambushed by the FBI 🤷♂️
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@NickJFuentes HOLY FUCK. Nick, I swear to God, he did the same thing to me. He walked me and Jake up to that room with a batting cage. We put our phones on the couch and went up to that secluded room with the big TVs. He asked me about where Ben Shapiro lived and how he could be taken out.
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
@LucasGageX This is getting really weird man. I wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience? Seems like his move was to invite all of the prominent JQ influencers to his place in 24/25, maybe the whole thing was like an Epstein-style honeypot. I just thought he was really dumb.
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@NickJFuentes I've only told one person about this, and they can confirm. It was the only weird thing about that trip.
@deezy_nate77 - Nate Deezy
@LucasGageX @NickJFuentes So do you think he was just trying to get you guys to say some fucked up shit, or is he truly fucked up enough to try and assassinate people?
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@deezy_nate77 @NickJFuentes I thought he wanted to just keep the phones away for his own protection, to make sure I wasn't recording him or something. I didn't think of it as a big deal, but I did tell one person about it, that it was strange. Now it's clearly something else.
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@MasterDade1 @deezy_nate77 @NickJFuentes Yep. Just posted the video with the literal room I'm talking about.
reSee.it AI Summary
NickJFuentes says Dan Bilzerian had them confiscate phones, then asked how hard it would be to assassinate Israeli ministers, and invited him to Dubai/Qatar (which he declined); Bilzerian was allegedly ambushed by the FBI. LucasGageX adds he and Nick were taken to a room with a batting cage, phones left on the couch, then to a secluded room with big TVs, where Bilzerian asked about Ben Shapiro’s residence and how to take him out, above a bouncy floor.
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
The first time I met Dan Bilzerian at his house, he had us put our phones in another room, then asked me how difficult it would be to assassinate Israeli government ministers. Then he invited me to Dubai and Qatar, which I declined. On his way there he was ambushed by the FBI 🤷♂️
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@NickJFuentes HOLY FUCK. Nick, I swear to God, he did the same thing to me. He walked me and Jake up to that room with a batting cage. We put our phones on the couch and went up to that secluded room with the big TVs. He asked me about where Ben Shapiro lived and how he could be taken out.
@LucasGageX - Lucas Gage
@NickJFuentes We were in the small room right above the bouncy floor. https://t.co/7OZBhVGglj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on a plan to perform a jump from a high spot, with the participants debating how to execute it safely and whether to proceed at all. Speaker 0 jokes about someone “playing baseball in his own house,” setting a loose, chaotic mood. Speaker 1 responds with hostility and questions, signaling tension and uncertainty about proceeding. The two then try to determine if everything is ready to go, asking Dan to confirm readiness: “Dan, is that ready to go? If I jump here. You want to throw it away?” Dan’s role is to validate whether they should proceed.
The plan involves someone named Lucas who is expected to climb up to a platform to perform the jump. Speaker 0 says, “Lucas, you gotta climb up here and do it. I gotta jump off,” indicating that Lucas would be the climber, while Speaker 1 suggests there are alternative ways to approach the jump, including performing it from up there or moving to another spot. The dialogue reveals a few possible routes: jumping from a lower position to a target, or jumping from a higher point where there is a rope. The instruction from Speaker 1 is concrete: “You go here. All the way up to where there’s that rope.” The plan then becomes to “land on your feet,” with Speaker 1 reassuring that “it don’t hurt.”
There is a sense of risk and improvisation throughout. Speaker 1 describes a preferred method: “you could do that too, actually,” but emphasizes using the rope as the primary point of contact for the jump. The sequence is described in steps: ascend to the rope, approach, then execute the jump, and land on one’s feet in the chosen landing zone. The dialogue emphasizes confidence in the landing technique, asserting that landing on the feet will avoid pain.
Towards the end, the mood shifts to a darker, starker note as Speaker 0 asks, “What if we just, like, smashed you? Just line up.” This line introduces a hypothetical, more dangerous outcome, underscoring the tension and potential consequences of the stunt. The exchange ends with this ominous possibility, leaving the decision to proceed unresolved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say what's up, Jake? Bouncing around. This guy this guy's playing baseball in his own house.
Speaker 1: Fuck you. Or what? You got the fuck it.
Speaker 0: I gotta jump. Is that is that ready to go or what?
Speaker 1: I think so. I would ask Dan.
Speaker 0: Dan, is that ready to go? If I jump here. You want to throw it away?
Speaker 1: I'm gonna drop.
Speaker 0: What's filming now?
Speaker 1: Alright. Let's just do this. No. Alright. I'll go do it up there.
Lucas, you gotta climb up here and do it. I gotta
Speaker 0: jump off. No.
Speaker 1: You do it from up here. Oh, I gotta jump off there
Speaker 0: and do that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's not that bad. I've done it a few times. Probably got to
Speaker 0: jump into
Speaker 1: that thing. Yeah. Yeah. You go there and dive and hit the fucking right in the middle. Jump into that?
Yeah. But, no, no, from go from up there where there's that fucking rope.
Speaker 0: Oh, jump into that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. You you could do that too, actually, but you go here. All the way up to where there's that rope. Yeah.
Just land on your feet. It don't hurt. What if we just, like, smashed you? Just line up.
Speaker 0: Oh my god.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount meeting Dan Bilzerian: he had us put phones away, then asked how hard it would be to assassinate Israeli ministers. He invited me to Dubai and Qatar, which I declined, and he was ambushed by the FBI on his way there. I don’t know who he is; I thought he was dumb. He accuses me of being a federal agent while he and his father are under FBI probe and talk about stirring violence. I wonder if others had similar experiences and whether his “honeypot” move is real. Was he ambushed on the tarmac in late 2024?
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
The first time I met Dan Bilzerian at his house, he had us put our phones in another room, then asked me how difficult it would be to assassinate Israeli government ministers. Then he invited me to Dubai and Qatar, which I declined. On his way there he was ambushed by the FBI 🤷♂️
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
I don’t know who the fuck this person actually is, I don’t think anybody does. Initially I thought he was just a retard. But he is accusing me of being a “federal agent,” when him and his father are under FBI investigation and he frequently talks about stirring up violence. Sus
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
@LucasGageX This is getting really weird man. I wonder if anyone else has had a similar experience? Seems like his move was to invite all of the prominent JQ influencers to his place in 24/25, maybe the whole thing was like an Epstein-style honeypot. I just thought he was really dumb.
@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes
@DanBilzerian Did you or did you not get ambushed by the FBI on the tarmac when you fled to Corsica, Dubai, and Qatar to discuss citizenship with government ministers in late 2024?
@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman
THE BAAL CYCLE: Irrefutable proof that a highly-advanced civilization lived in this world before us, was BURIED, and ERASED from our historical timeline. [🎥: @mylunchbreak_]
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a detailed, continuing exploration of ancient sites, focusing on the Hypogeum in Paola, Malta. He notes the Hypogeum is an enormous subterranean structure excavated about four thousand five hundred and twenty-four years ago, lifting huge blocks of limestone. It was discovered in 1902 during construction, with 7,000 elongated skulls found, most destroyed, and remaining ones hidden from the public. He points out that some underground chambers appear cut to imitate the architecture of above-ground megalithic temples, including false bays and windows, underground windows, and a ceiling feature described as “one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below” to imitate a roof. He questions whether the structure was originally above ground and buried during a cataclysmic event that killed the inhabitants, arguing that the mainstream view as a burial site does not fit the evidence of immediate death or entrapment.
He asserts a global pattern of civilizations being buried or hidden beneath the surface after massive events, citing that the original structure could have melted or been altered, and presents this as part of a broader claim that the old world remains buried beneath modern layers. He then shifts to Italy, describing the Hypogeum of the Valumnus family, uncovered in 1840 near a road excavation, with about 200 tombs and a site thought to date to the second and third centuries BC. It features ten rooms and two winged demon guardians at the entrance. He mentions urns painted with scenes, including griffins, and ties this to Tartarian theories, suggesting mythic beings and Greek myth figures were real in the past. He shows photos showing changes over time, including items removed from rooms and walls, implying that discoveries have been altered or stripped as roads and modern interventions occurred. He argues that the underground world contains a hidden history yet to be revealed and laments the loss of artifacts.
Speaker 0 then turns to Syria, continuing the Hypogeum topic with the Hypogeum of Yarhei, an underground tomb timeline misrepresented as January 2007/2009, and claims it was originally located in Palmyra’s Valley of the Tombs before being excavated and restored, moved to Damascus in 1935, and later placed in a national museum. He recounts an AI correction episode about the date of discovery (1933) and the move (1935), insisting that the true timeline is being obscured. He surveys Palmyra today, noting extensive destruction of a vast old-world temple complex, including the Temple of Baal, the Temple of Dagon, and a monumental arch. He references Gertrude Bell’s 1900 description of Palmyra’s grandeur and argues that many columns, temples, and palaces remain under the surface or were destroyed to erase the past. He highlights the Temple of Baal as a massive site, comparing its size to the Great Pyramid of Giza, and claims additional ancient sites nearby—such as a castle on a cliff—were melted and turned to sand.
Speaker 0 condemns reconstruction narratives as inadequate and asserts ongoing efforts to hide evidence of an advanced, previously unknown civilization. He mentions the destruction of temples in 2015 (Temple of Baal Shemin and related arches) and argues that such acts are designed to erase true history. He concludes by emphasizing that thousands of tablets from Palmyra were found in 1929, including the Baal Cycle and other texts, and suggests that what is presented publicly is incomplete or deceptive. He ends by urging viewers to remember the pottery and anticipating more discoveries, noting the broader implication that the past is far more complex and veiled than commonly acknowledged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Hypogeum is an enormous subterranean structure excavated four thousand five hundred and twenty four years ago, lifting huge blocks of limestone. All thanks to this group yet again for their input. And I thought that we had covered most of this topic, but I kept digging, and we are not even close. Today, we are going back for more. For anyone new, we are speaking about the Hypogeum located in Malta, more specifically, in the town of Paola, where they found this underground temple in nineteen o two, discovering it while constructing houses, blocking the public, all of us, from the area for nearly a decade where they found 7,000 elongated skulls, destroying most of them, and then hiding the remaining ones from the public.
And we have shown all of this. Now today, I wanted to go back because there are things that blew my mind. One of the most striking characteristics of this location is that some of the chambers appear to have been cut in imitation of the architecture of the above ground megalithic temples. Doing all of this underground. Are you seeing what this means?
I'll keep going. Where they found false bays and windows. Underground Windows. Can you see very clearly now? This temple is underground now, but I don't believe that it always was.
Most importantly, the ceiling with one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below to supposedly imitate a roof. Imitating a roof? Or was this just a roof? Was this a temple just on the ground level when it was constructed with the event that we've talked about so many times, burying it, and in doing so, killing the 7,000 plus individuals inside? Is the previous civilization just like we found here buried under our feet right now?
All over the world, and we have yet to find it. And to prove our point here, the mainstream thinks this was some sort of burial ritual, saying that it appears that the bodies were probably left exposed until the flesh had decomposed and fallen off. When in reality, these individuals were most likely killed on the spot from the event that took place. And if there were any that didn't die immediately, they would have been trapped underground. Individuals were not buried separately but piled onto each other.
This is all according to our friends right up here at the top. It makes so much more sense that this was not a burial site at all. It was originally above ground, and they were then trapped under the ground in this event and tossed the deceased into the pile. Remember, this event melted structures all over the world. We have shown so many examples of this.
The original structure definitely could have been melted, now leaving it look like it was chiseled, chiseled with an antler like we have shown. We have seen so many times all over the world that the old world is buried below our feet. Something massive happened here 100%. It's undeniable at this point. And like I said, I wanted to go deeper.
I wanted to show you even more. So I went back to the hypogeum of the Valumnus family located in Italy. This site includes about 200 tombs. And then finding this one in 1840. And then knowing all about the second and third century BC, they found this one while carrying out excavation works for a new road where it seems like it was used until the first century BC.
It seems like it. Unbelievable. Having 10 rooms and two winged demons guarding the entrance. Again, finding all of this while putting in a nice road and a sidewalk for all of us, showing that most people have no idea what is under their feet. We haven't even found it all, and we know this.
And it all predates the horses and wagons nonsense. Stone structures structures of winged demons in advanced group underneath our feet. And then it all goes back to dirt roads and sheds. No technology and writing by feather. Or are we not being told the truth?
You tell me. Remember, we are in Italy, and I told you we were coming back for a reason. Are you ready? Right here in front of the main entrance sits collection of urns found in the necropolis in other tombs belonging to other families. It seems that they were all painted with various scenes, Some with the griffin.
The griffin. Yet again, Tartaria. I don't believe that this griffin was so mythical after all, and I don't think it was here that long ago. With other represent ations of Greek mythology. Mythology.
Not so mythical after all in my opinion. And found because we were going to build a road. Oh, and what happened to that guy's head? Maybe there was a random earthquake eight hundred years ago that just wanted his head and left everything else just perfectly fine. Now check this picture out.
This was found making a road. I just cannot even imagine what else we haven't seen yet or has been removed from us already. This is incredible. Our history is missing so much. The reset clearly took place within the last few hundred years, throwing us right back into the horse and wagon era, removing all technology, removing all the history, all the knowledge about this place that we all live.
I've seen enough at this point where I believe that there were angels here as well as demons, and I have no idea if they're really gone. Again, this place was found in 1840. This is the timeline that we have talked about so many times. Our current civilization, all of us starting back in the eighteen hundreds. We have episode ten and thirty eight that show everything that's been given back to us within these last few hundred years.
Who lived here before we all got here? It's crazy to look at the depictions of the past. If they didn't put it all in stone, we would have no idea what used to be here because we're definitely not told about these things, about demons or angels being involved with humans. And we all know that that story was removed from the book. The narrative that demons and angels were involved with the humans.
This narrative is folklore supposedly. Yet, we see the angels and we see the demons intertwined into the buildings right into the stone, into the stories that are being depicted on these buildings within the stone art in every single continent. Clearly, this was the civilization that constructed the old world palaces. This one on the bottom right looks like he has a tool in his hand, having huge hands for being so small. Same with the other one on the left.
But it's all just art, of course. We get a good look at the whole room right here and see where they found these. It's right when you walk in, and I wouldn't be shocked that they are guarding something behind that wall. And let's be honest, we all know that we're not seeing everything that was originally down there before they found it. Things were removed.
We all know this now. Should I prove it? Well, right here, we can see that there were items in here, and this is today. Could you even imagine a hundred years ago, this place that we all live was probably a free for all. So today, we get this photo.
The chains are We have a bunch of items here all over the floor. Then flipping to this photo, it's all gone. Even the thing on the wall is changed. The other one is just removed. So we know that whatever was down here in 1839, a year before they found it, unfortunately, it is not here anymore.
And let's just be honest. It's shocking that they left anything at all. If they would've just taken all of these statues out, we probably wouldn't suspect a thing. All found underground while making a road in Italy. Absolutely incredible stuff.
And look where this place is located. If you were just driving past, you would have no idea that this is in there. Look at this. It honestly looks like they want it to be hidden. It's so weird.
If you were walking past this place, never done any research, you would have no clue that this is inside. It's crazy. Just knowing that, could you imagine what is underneath all these people's houses or at least what was? Surely, there are tunnels. And I bet people go to this musical academy today and have no clue that this is right next to them.
We have a bar right here to the right, and I bet none of them know what's inside the building to the left. An incredible operation worldwide to suppress our true history. I'm glad thousands of us know about this place now. Let's go to Syria. Staying with the Hypogeum topic because this one is just insane.
The Hypogeum Of Yarhei, where the underground tomb was supposedly built in January, not 01/2007 and 01/2009. Can you believe this nonsense? I need everybody to understand that they are not pinning down the date of January. It's not happening. And they go on to say that this under underground tomb was originally located in the Palmyra's Valley Of The Tombs before being excavated and restored, destroyed.
The underground tomb was then moved to Damascus in 1935 and was then moved again and placed in its national museum. Can you even imagine what we are not being shown? This is insane. Moving things around in 1935 and later placing it somewhere else. And you can see here with the AI chat GPT that they are influencing If you didn't know the truth, they are trying to change this narrative.
I asked when it was found, and the AI says it was found in 1983. So I replied that I thought it was moved to Damascus in 1935, like we were told. The AI replies, you're correct. It was indeed moved to Damascus in 1935. Here's the correct information for you.
Can you believe this? Overriding the truth. Why are they so against telling us the truth over and over, hiding that they moved it? Can you believe that we have to correct the AI? Very clearly, a human entered that information in there about this story.
So I said, what year was it found? Because it does not wanna answer this question. Finally giving us the answer after backing it into a corner and pulling its teeth. It was found in 1933, and they did not wanna tell us this. Because once you know that it was found in 1933, you know that they moved it in 1935 to Damascus just two years later.
So finding this and then moving it two years later. So what else did they find in Palmyra? What was wrong with the first location? Why did it need to be moved so fast? A 150 miles away.
Remember, this thing was just fine for centuries. This is according to them, their narrative. So what I wanna know is why did they need to move it? The decision to move it to Damascus in 1935 was driven by the need to protect and preserve it. Can you believe this?
So we are clearly not going to be told the truth here. The carvings were vulnerable due to the exposure of the elements, the temperature fluctuations, a bunch of lies since they just told us that this thing was there from the year 01/2008. On the dot, moving it to Damascus in 1935, made it more accessible to scholars, historians, and archaeologists. Oh, the poor archaeologists. They can't get in their car and go see the historic site, so they just needed it moved closer to their apartment.
It's embarrassing. This narrative is a joke, and this statue right here in the middle, he also got his head chopped off. Now that we know they are hiding something massive about this, now I'm going to go back to the original site and investigate what is going on there in Palmyra, Syria because we know that something is off now. Alright. This is the site today.
Palmyra, Syria, you are now being exposed to the world. Let's have some fun. Palmyra, meaning the city of palm trees. No palm trees. But I do see a massive palace that has been completely destroyed.
A palace from the old world. 100%. And what is this? Eight years ago, we get an article that this group right here is destroying the old world, destroying the Venice of the sands piece by piece. Will this organization erase the memory of the extraordinary history?
In 1900, a British traveler, Gertrude Bell wrote, I wonder if the world presents a more singular landscape. It is a mass of columns ranged into long avenues, grouped into temples, lying broken in the sand. Beyond them is the immense Temple Of Baal. More destroyed heads right here. Every single one of them are destroyed.
Clearly, we have located a site that is from the old world and was extremely important to a civilization that was here. To give this a little context for anyone new to this research, within the Old Testament, Baal was worshiped by the Israel Worshipping Baal was seen as a major threat to the worship of Yahweh, the god of Israel. This text gets really deep. I won't be reading it all, but you can see a lot of it. The worship of Baal is often associated with moral corruption.
The biblical authors depict Baal worship as leading the Israelites into practices that are contrary to the laws and moral expectations set by Yahweh, including rituals of these two things. With Jeremiah nineteen five stating that the Israelites are condemned for building high places to ball and burning this as offerings. Now let's get back to this location. What was going on here? What was going on in Syria before we all got here?
What was going on at the Temple Of Baal? A photo from 2009. Again, all of the faces removed over and over everywhere in the world. In the background here, we have a structure that has been completely melted in my opinion. So knowing what we know about this location now, let's go further.
The temple was built on understand what that means? A tell is an archaeological term referring to a mound or hill that forms from centuries of human settlement over time as people build and rebuild in the same area, each new layer of construction builds on top of the old. When a temple is built on a tell, it means that the temple is constructed on top of this layered mound of the past civilizations. Can you even believe what we just read? The Temple Of Baal is constructed on top of a previous civilization's work, a tell.
There is 100% more beneath this temple, and we now know that. This temple that we just saw was most likely not used for positive things. Was then converted into a Christian church in November. They just couldn't help it. They had to pick the place that had crazy things going on, including sacrifices and rituals.
Couldn't they have picked a different place? No. They couldn't. The nineteen twenties comes around, and they cleared the temple grounds of all of its post classical elements. They destroyed it.
Clearly, something happened here in this location. Advanced technology 100%. Advanced construction. And I have no idea whether this previous civilization that was here was a great bunch. I don't know if they were great beings with great morals, but what I do know is that we are not being told the truth about them.
And we also know that they could easily construct palaces, and it was not with a hammer and chisel, and they were not riding around on horses. The previous civilization had all of the technology that we see today and so much more. We are being given some of this technology back slowly, and we know this now. Now I'm gonna take this to Google Earth and show you this area. Look at all these columns All the way down this road, we get the amphitheater, hammers and chisels, of course, donkey riding cowboys of the past.
No. It's like an old world city here. They have palaces all over the place, like some sort of resort or something. And they have a stage where who knows what took place right here. Then, well, just based on what we read, I think we kinda know.
Then we have another destroyed structure here. This place is completely destroyed. Stone all over the place. Again, look at this road. The whole thing is filled with columns.
Did any one of us learn about this place in our history classes? No? Why not? I think we all know why. Spinning the camera around so we can see it.
Look at this with arches and everything. More columns over here. Another palace in the background. And then, of course, the Temple Of Baal. Remember, we know that there are structures from the past right underneath this place as well.
Keep that in mind. Look at the size of this temple. It's massive. Measuring out to 434,893 square feet, its perimeter is a half mile. Now I'm gonna put that into perspective and measure the Great Pyramid Of Giza, the biggest one.
It's basically the exact same size. The Pyramid in Giza has a slightly longer perimeter of point five six miles. This Temple Of Baal was massive. This is crazy. This site is huge.
Just random columns all over the place. Look at this picture showing that there was so much more. And then we see the Statue Of Liberty right on the site. Now when we go back and see that they removed this from this location in Syria and moved it to Damascus in 1935, we can see that this was most likely happening over and over and over in the early nineteen hundreds, removing so many things that we don't get to see today. Just like we were told when the nineteen twenties hit, they cleared the temple grounds of its elements, taking everything of significance from this site and hiding it from all of us 100%.
This is so clear now. This research shows that we are missing so much of the true story. Massive stone structures, hundreds of columns, arches towering over us while we walk through. We all got reset. Back to donkeys and wagons.
Reset from stone palaces to wooden huts. No lights and freezing in the winters. Going to the bathroom in your backyard. The further that we go into this research, the more we have to ask, where are we, and what are we not being told? Who is controlling this ridiculous narrative that we're all taught since day one and why?
The further that we go, the more we advance our knowledge, we see patterns, we see the flaws clearer and clearer. And once we all know the truth, we will never go back. The Temple Of Baal, located in Syria, is so much more than just crumbled stone. In my opinion, it is a haunting reminder that the previous civilization had a very dark side. We showed the Temple Of Baal, but did you know that right next to this site in Syria, we have a castle from the old world located up on top of a cliff where we all know just by looking at this and all of the research that we've done to this point, we know that this thing is so much bigger and has been completely melted and turned into sand.
We know that they told us that the Temple Of Baal that is right here, right next to this castle, where I believe they were both constructed by the same group during the exact same period. We were told that the Temple Of Baal was found in thirty two AD. Thirty two AD. Not '31, not '33, but pinning it down to thirty two AD. With a side note that we are correct yet again.
It is inaccessible today due to being in a war zone. War zones. These zones, in my opinion, are to block the public from seeing what was there or what still is. When the main entrance has been destroyed, a great way to destroy the true history, to just blow it up and chalk it up to a war. So thirty two AD, this one is constructed two thousand years ago.
Then they wait, like, one thousand two hundred years to build a castle. This is what we are being told right next to each other, one thousand two hundred years apart. I think this is very obvious that these structures were constructed during the exact same time period. This entire location was clearly an old world city, a palace city, and I don't believe it was thousands of years ago. I believe it was so much closer to our timeline than what we are being told and has been mostly destroyed, making it look older than it is with our friends over here at this group interested in our favorite locations yet again, stating that this one is one of the most important cultural centers of the ancient world, the old world, the previous civilization.
This is the Tadmer Castle and was placed on the list of world heritage sites in danger in 2013 due to an ongoing Syrian civil war. The castle was captured by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in 2015, then recaptured in 2016. Now remember, it was supposedly fine for centuries until our timeline comes around and it starts being captured every year and then put into danger war zones. What kind of season does this sound like to you? Making the case stronger and stronger.
Making it sound like a little season to me with the book of life on the way. It's all very interesting. With retreating ISIS fighters blowing up parts of the castle, including the stairway, leading to the entrance causing extensive damage all right in front of our faces. Yet, I would bet even some of our greatest history majors have most likely never even seen this place before. All by design, this location definitely wasn't highlighted in history 01/2001, one 2002, or whatever other number they wanna make up.
With a few more captures here in 2016 and again in 2017, Every year, recapturing this place. It's ridiculous. And even more ridiculous is that we are told that this was built by the Mamluks. And why is this ridiculous? Well, because Mamluks translates to one who is owned or down here stating much clearer.
Originally, the Mamlux were this word. Again, not going to say that word ever again here since we had a major issue with it in the past. We're gonna leave that word alone, but you can see it right here. So let's read this again. The Old World Palace Castle was built one thousand two hundred years later by a bunch of laves with an s at the front.
These stories are insane. To believe that this kind of group can construct a palace castle that lasts forever is insane to believe at this point. While they were purchased property, their status was above ordinary. The people that worked for free back in the thirteen hundreds, these are the people that we are told are the master builders of the past. It's incredible.
No training necessary. Just going up on that cliff with no power tools in the sand and building a palace castle. Eight hundred years ago, and it just so happens that it's right next to hundreds of columns and a temple the size of the Pyramid Of Giza. All a coincidence, of course. No.
So because there's a war going on here, we don't get to drop the guy down on this location and look around. Could you imagine waking up and here's the supermarket with your sports club over here and a hair salon? Then you have temples, castles, and the Tower Of Elable, all right outside your window in the morning, all dating back 2,000 years. Thanks to the experts. We know this now.
Well, no. We don't. When we all show up and the tower was demolished using explosives in 2015, this is a clear attack on the true history to hide what really happened here where we all live, blocking sites off from us, calling it a war, and then bombing these places. It happens over and over. In this shot, we also see the Damascus Gate.
This is Palmyra. So I'm gonna guess that this was renamed since Damascus is a 134 miles away. And I could honestly look at this picture all day. I believe this picture proves that the history that we were all given is a complete lie. It proves that something happened here.
An extremely advanced group was here and is now gone and is 100% being hidden from all of us, telling us that we are the most advanced group to ever be here. This lie is no longer acceptable. Clearly, there's been a civilization, and most likely civilizations, that have been here with incredible technology, and their construction proves this. It's left here all over the place for all of us to see, which is exactly why they have to blow it all up because it takes the mainstream narrative, and it rips it right in half. It completely destroys story time.
For the mainstream lovers, we are exposing it all and proving that this place that we all live is so much more than what we are told. Obviously, I had to come back to this location. It's extremely significant to our research and needed to be explored further. Having columns destroyed all over the place, telling us that this is from 2,000 years ago, a site that none of us can go and see today. Regardless of which religion the historical sites worshiped or still do, I believe that they are very important to understanding the true past of this place that we all live and should not be destroyed today just because we don't agree what they were used for.
This being said, there are some groups here today that may be planted to destroy the true history, and they might not agree with what I just stated. When this group, having a history of destroying ancient structures stating that they would destroy any artifacts that they didn't agree with religiously and proceeded to detonate a large quantity of explosives inside the Temple Of Baal Shemin, completely destroying the building in 2015. And I wanna be very clear. This is a separate temple than the Temple Of Baal that we previously covered, where the temple was also destroyed. Not only did they destroy both of these temples, they also destroyed the monumental arch.
The same exact arch that I said I could look at all day because it gives it all away. That arch is gone. When it was officially destroyed in 2015, destroying structures and sites all over the world. Sites that easily prove that something is off about what we've all been told. And they say they have plans to rebuild it.
Right. Yeah. You're not rebuilding that. We all know that's not gonna happen.
Speaker 1: Too many beautiful cities. I've seen those cities. They're so beautiful and that, you know, for I don't know how you can ever rebuild them the way they were. It's not possible. I don't know how you can ever rebuild them the way they were.
It's not possible.
Speaker 0: When this is our civilization's replica, at this point, we shouldn't even embarrass ourselves. Saying we're gonna rebuild things from the old world, it actually exposes the fact that we can't do it or it takes so much longer. It exposes the truth. Blowing this site up using dynamite. And in 2016, very little of the arch remained standing.
You are always free to think whatever you'd like. As always, I am simply speaking based on everything that we have seen throughout so many hours of research here. Now I do believe that this was most likely the site where Ball was located. I also don't believe that this took place thousands of years ago. Like I've stated, I believe that this is why there is an obvious attempt even to this day to destroy it all.
To prove my point, why didn't anybody go in there and destroy this place in 1650? Why not 1420? The year January. Well, it's because, of course, in my opinion, those years are not real, at least the way that we think about them. I believe the actual year is fabricated.
I don't believe that this temple was erected two thousand years ago. There was an advanced civilization here that constructed these things within the last few hundred years, and all of their work is here for us to see. And I do not believe that these so called myths are so mythical after all. I think this place that we all live today is much different than we all understand, where we are all coming together and exposing the lies, showing the massive flaw in the stories. We are told that they are myths and then see massive temples all over the place that are being destroyed over and over.
Proof that what we're being told is a lie. Proof that a group of people were here that understood construction. Why hide a place from all of us if it's all just a myth? In mythological text, dwelling is described as a magnificent palace with silver and gold guarded like a fortress. All a myth, of course.
Not anymore. The Temple Of Baal was one of the most important temples in the ancient Near East and served as a focal point for religious ceremonies. Religious ceremonies, including just like we talked about in episode 97. All a myth, of course, with palaces all over the place and the whole thing blown up right in front of our faces. All a myth with text frequently describing this taking place, all dedicated to this figure.
Not only do we see this figure in text from modern day Syria, we see it written on clay tablets. We also see it in the Bible, the Old Testament, mentioning ball worship multiple times with references to this, with their locations right here. All just a myth, of course. Oh, wait. What is this?
Archaeological excavations at ancient ball worship sites such as Palmyra found remnants that suggest sacrificial activity showing that these so called myths may not be so mythical after all, just like we've seen so many times. Finding bones at the site with multiple texts confirming this activity. Again, you are always free to think whatever you'd like, but I don't believe that these texts are from thousands of years ago. I believe our timeline is a total mess and a complete fabrication of our true history. There are certain groups that still worship certain things today.
Do you think that they're just worshiping a mythical creature? You tell me. Now we were told that they were uncovering bones at Palmyra, the exact same location that we have been investigating today. They also mention another location. Before we enter this location, we need to understand that there were texts found in this location.
They found the text titled the ball cycle, a collection of texts. The Bal Cycle is composed of several epic poems or narrative fragments. The Bal Cycle provides indirect evidence of the types of rituals and offerings associated with Baal worship. They found all of this right here. They reflect the importance of rituals in ensuring Baal's favor and prosperity of the community.
All of this within the text. Rituals included offerings, which were sacrificed to appease ball and secure his blessings. The sacrifices were performed by priests. And then we can go back to the catacombs and see what they have done. Right underneath so many churches, what have they done?
What have we just found? Have they been practicing something that worships the opposite side without any of us knowing it using our structures that were originally meant for good. What practice has taken place worldwide? What are we seeing today? Did we just show the cause of the catacombs, a ritualistic intention just like we have shown into geometric patterns, a sacrifice right under the church's floorboards using the priest.
We are told that the sacrifices were performed by the priests. This is unbelievable. Just over 200 miles driving from the Temple Of Baal, all located in Syria. We have this location where they found the tablets, the location in which they found the Baal cycle, the story. We are told that this is the location where the world got its first alphabet.
And this is all documented, of course. No. With great fires taking place here as well. When they tell us the city seems to have been burnt and the population probably diminished. Probably.
Maybe. But we will never know according to the mainstream narrative. Just throwing things in there. It probably was from thirty two AD. Probably.
It might have been. Now they tell us that the city seems to have been burnt and the population probably diminished, but I have a feeling that they burned it down recently just like every other city in the world. So going back to this map, we can see that there was something of significance going on here. And a side note really quick, look how you can drop the guy down all over Europe. But once you go further south into Africa and The Middle East, it's just mass amounts of land that are unavailable to our view.
Thousands and thousands of miles of land that I'm sure have clues to our past, either sitting on top of or underneath the layer of sand and so much being hidden from us. For instance, look at this. It looks like there's nothing here. Like, all there is is just a bunch of sand. But once you click on it, we have so much going on.
Playgrounds and the rest. It's like there's a civilization there that is not what we are shown from the aerial shot. It's very odd. So let's go back to the action. We are now shown five main sites in this city, the fortress, the main palace, the acropolis, another Temple Of Baal, and the Temple Of Dagon, where we all know here that there is so much under our feet that would blow our minds today.
When we see that after the chance discovery by local peasants in 1929, they excavated this site, unearthing the palace, which also gave us the tablets and artifacts, the previous civilization. The old world, finding more than 1,000 tablets in 1929, found right off the coast of modern day Syria. Finding these tablets in 1929, It hasn't even been a hundred years yet. Finding the ball cycle. 1,000 tablets.
Could you even imagine what they found? Finding the ball cycle, including stories all about ball. Now what other stories are hidden below the surface? What are we not being shown, and what did they really find in 1929? Were any other stories found within those thousand tablets?
What do you think? This place that we live is incredible. These are now places that we will all never forget. These are now stories that we will remember forever, taking our research deeper and deeper, finding the truth all over the world, exposing that something massive happened right here where we are today, all happening within the last few hundred years. We're also exposing that the past, the old world stories were being uncovered just ninety five years ago in a location that we were told was mythical, where it doesn't seem so mythical after all.
And the truth is gonna be harder and harder to find the longer that we wait. Just like we see with these tablets, the site where the tablets were found has been affected by the conflict, and the exact extent of damage or loss to these specific tablets is less clear. They have removed the truth yet again. We are told that peasants found these stories just ninety five years ago. A thousand tablets is what we're told when we know that there were probably more and removing them from us right away without a doubt, withholding information that would go against the mainstream story, telling us that the initial excavations revealed that they just found some pottery.
Do you remember when I told you to remember the pottery? So they tell us they found some pottery, and don't forget the pottery. I believe the pottery is something that they give us so that we don't dig deeper. Don't forget this because I'm gonna show it again in future episodes. Remember the pottery.
I no longer believe this to be the case. I think we all know now that they found much more than just some pottery, especially when we know that they found royal palaces where excavations revealed the remains of grand royal palaces, large multistory structures with elaborate decorations and extensive facilities. They found all of this, and they found temples, including the Temple Of Baal, finding high priests' libraries containing a wealth of texts. The high priests' library was particularly important for its collection of religious and mythological texts, including the Baal Cycle, the Legend of Danil, and the death of ball. These are the stories that we are told about, where we all know that there were so many more.
All of this found in the nineteen twenties with more libraries located on the Acropolis, with more texts found in these libraries. Could you even imagine the information from the past that was found that we're all not being told about? With access to the physical artifacts, the text, being restricted to ensure their preservation, are we sure that this is the case? Restricting the public, impacting their accessibility to the public. It seems like an incredible excuse to me.
And then making sure we all get excited about the pottery. I don't know about you, but I think I'm about done with all the pottery. I wanna see the old world tax, and I hope you all have a great rest of your day. I'll be back very soon with much more. See you.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
1943 zee German bells 🔔 https://t.co/4LCPoX8Ey1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The discussion centers on bells, specifically the Die Glock, a giant German bell used for levitation. Nick Cook and many other scientists believe the bell discharged some sort of radiation connected to levitation. Inside the bell were cylinders that spun in the opposite direction and also contained mercury. Not just any mercury, red mercury—the kind the government tells you to stay away from. Mercury, or quicksilver, is shown here, with electricity involved. So we have mercury creating voltage, and then uranium or radium present, which would emit the radiation.
The sounds coming off the bell were described as beehive-like, and there was a bluish phosphorus glow from the bell. The text notes that this form of levitation and other inventions were similar to the Vril Society, which people should look into, along with Wotan. Also mentioned are Schauberger's work, Tesla's work, and the bell itself.
The narrative also references the United States government claiming that Germany was developing nukes, and posits that this helps explain why they were invaded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today we're gonna talk about bells, and we're gonna go through this book. You know, the Germans did the Die Glock, which was a giant bell, which was used for levitation. And it shows right here, Nick Cook and many other scientists all believe that bell discharged some sort of radiation, which is really interesting, and was connected to levitation. Now here's where it gets fascinating. There were cylinders inside the bell which spun in the opposite direction, which also contained mercury.
And not just any type of mercury, red mercury, the one the government tells you to stay away from. So check this. This is mercury right here. Right? Quicksilver.
Look at how much electricity. Wild. So we got mercury, which creates that voltage, and then you got the uranium or radium right here. Okay? And then that would emit the radiation.
What's interesting is that the sounds that came off of it were like a beehive, and there was a bluish phosphorus glow of the bell. And they say that this form of levitation and other inventions were similar to the Vril Society, which people need to look into in Wotan. Also, Schauberger's work, Tesla's work, and right there, that bell. Now what's funny is the United States government was saying that Germany was developing nukes, they had to invade them. Do you kinda see why they had to invade them now?
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim wool is burned with chlorine and coated with nylon to be washable, so it’s not natural wool and may release microplastics and chemicals, especially in socks. I advise asking brands about “superwashing,” Hercosett 25, or polymers; GOTS alone isn’t proof. I name brands that do or don’t; natural, non-toxic fibers matter. I note BPA and chemicals in most socks, offer an organic cotton option with 10% off NaturallyFTW10. Also, a nod to @treesonstumps.
@NaturallyFTW - Natural Immunity FTW
🚨 WOOL IS COATED IN PLASTIC This is a huge Scam that barely anyone knows about. Smartwool. Darn Tough. Most brands. They charge a zillion dollars for "wool" "natural" clothes, but the awful truth is that they're: • Burned w/CHLORINE • Coated w/NYLON polymer (plastic) They do this to make the wool more convenient & washable, not shrink or felt like real wool is supposed to. The resulting product is nothing like natural wool. And all that's actually touching your skin is PLASTIC. This coating releases microplastics & chemicals over time, that can be inhaled & absorbed (especially by hot, sweaty feet or while working out). They don't tell you this. They just charge you a bunch of money for the "wool" & act like they're selling you a natural, premium product. There's no way to know that they're doing this unless you ask the company. Specifically, ask if the use: • "Superwashing" • or "Hercosett 25" • or apply a polymer at any stage of processing • GOTS certified organic means it's safe as well MOST companies are doing this. A small handful are not. Namely: DILLING WOOLROOM MANTECO RAWGANIQUE NUI ORGANICS SERENDIPITY HOME OF WOOL Wearing natural & nontoxic fibers is super important, especially socks. (studies show nearly 100% of socks contain BPA & other horrible chemicals that are absorbed) But MODERN WOOL is far from natural or nontoxic. It's time for this scam to be exposed.
@NaturallyFTW - Natural Immunity FTW
BPA, parabens in nearly 100% of socks tested. & unfortunately, these chemicals Are absorbed. Here's a good organic cotton sock option (Zero synthetics, hard to find): https://cottonique.com/products/elite-elastic-free-100-cotton-socks-2pairs-pack-melange-grey?sca_ref=4963976.X4RXezz3AC&utm_source=uppromote&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=affiliate (Use code NaturallyFTW10% for 10% off [affiliate]) https://t.co/j8CasvSi2Y
@NaturallyFTW - Natural Immunity FTW
@treesonstumps 😳
@drhossamsamy65 - Dr.Sam Youssef Ph.D.,Ph.D.,DPT.
⛔️A 30-year-old Polish Zionist Jewish man was arrested after being caught on security camera footage entering a church, spitting on the altar, and throwing the cross.He had disguised himself to make the attack look like a Muslim attack.‼️ https://t.co/0GG3jqf3Kg
@reality_revolt_ - Dimitri Revolt
Learn to read the signs of scripted events and pre-planned narratives. Everything is coded long before it happens. Watch my series https://realityrevolt.com https://t.co/xLhyjeUT32
@neyikaybettik - neyi kaybettiğini hatırla
Güvenlik kamerası görüntülerinde bir kiliseye girip sunağa tükürdüğü ve haçı fırlattığı görülen 30 yaşındaki Polonyalı siyonist yahudi bir adam tutuklandı. Saldırıyı Müslüman saldırısı gibi göstermek için kılık değiştirmişti. Bütün dünyanın kötülük merkezi oldular. https://t.co/39lmgWyU2w
@BartNijman - Bart Nijman
zeker niet gepast dat ik acuut moet denken aan de Baby Hitler Theory maar goed mijn gedachten gaan ook maar gewoon hun eigen gang natuurlijk
@lidewij_devos - Lidewij de Vos
Dankbaar, nieuwsgierig, ontroerd, en met trots en zoveel liefde kunnen Massimo en ik vandaag bekendmaken dat wij in blijde verwachting zijn van het kleinste grootste geluk. ❤️❤️❤️ Wij verwachten ons kindje in september. Tot het zomerreces zal ik aan het werk blijven in de Kamer. Na het reces neem ik een paar maanden zwangerschapsverlof. Heel veel dank aan alle dierbaren om ons heen van wie wij de afgelopen tijd al zoveel lieve berichten en wensen hebben mogen ontvangen.
reSee.it AI Summary
I remember Isabella Stroupe. She was 19, loved books, called Bella by her family. She was tied to a bed and tortured for months in an East Charlotte apartment, with broken bones and repeated rape. Thomaz Hamilton, a violent repeat offender, is charged with first-degree murder and first-degree rape. She was alive for months. Say her name. Isabella Stroupe.
@mattvanswol - Matt Van Swol
Her name was Isabella Stroupe. She was 19. She loved books. Her family called her Bella. She was tied to a bed with a tow strap and tortured for months in an east Charlotte NC apartment. Multiple broken bones. St*b wounds. R*ped repeatedly. Her mother said she screamed and screamed when she found out. Thomaz Hamilton, a violent repeat offender is charged with first-degree m*rder and first-degree r*pe. Months. She was alive in there for months. Say her name. Isabella Stroupe. WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS.