TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

SpartaJustice
Posted - March 24, 2023 at 7:07 PM
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 10:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Covid19 was deliberately released, funded by Anthony Fauci's NIAID. Gain of Function studies continued despite the moratorium. The motive was profit and global control. Numerous individuals and organizations are implicated, including Bill and Melinda Gates, WHO, FDA, CDC, and more. The accused must be arrested.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

BREAKING NEWS: Covid-19 was deliberately released on the populations by entities with intent. Anthony Fauci's NIAID was paid 400 million dollars in royalties by Moderna. Covid-19 was engineered in the United States after receiving an infectious clone WIV1-CoV Spike from Wuhan. Not only did Anthony Fauci knowingly and willfully lie in violation of federal law in Congress about not funding Gain of Function, but Anthony Fauci continued these Gain of Function studies and requested additional studies during the moratorium. Ralph S. Baric created SARS-CoV-2 and lied to the world. The fact of the matter is. We the people are currently subject to a criminal conspiracy that is ongoing right now, the evidence is right in our face. This was all done so that the world could be injected with the experimental Covid vaccines creating billions of dollars in profits and shaping the global agenda while killing and injuring millions of people around the world. 2009-2023 Lockstep Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic Criminal Co-conspiracy, including and not limited to individually and collectively: Bill and Melinda Gates individually and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. World Health Organization (WHO) and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO Director General, U.S. FDA, CDC Executive Directors and Officers. NIH, NIAID Executive Directors and Officers. Anthony Stephen Fauci. Alex Azar HHS, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak. World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents. Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller Jr, Rothschilds, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Rockefeller Foundation, Global Business Network (GBN), Peter Schwartz, Chairman GBN. Convicted Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic and Neural Monitoring Governmental Executive Defendants: U.S. Department of Defense Executive Command and DARPA. Xi JinPing, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation. Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America. Joseph R. Biden 46th President of the United States of America. Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the UK. Matt Hancock, UK Secretary of State for Health. The Crown Corporation and all of its Subsidiaries including and not limited to Serco. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada. Chrystia Freeland DBA Deputy Prime Minister. Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada Chief Health Officer. Dr. Supriya Sharma, Chief medical adviser for Health Canada. OECD - Secretary General - Mathias Cormann. Scott Morrison, Prime Minister of Australia. Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister of New Zealand. King Charles III, Prince William. Governor General Mary Simon. Stefan Löfven Prime Minister of Sweden. Minister of Heath Lena Hallengren. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India. Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron, President of France. Edouard Phillipe, Prime Minister of France. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany. António Guterres, Secretary General of the UN. European Union, and President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. President of the Parliament, David Sassoli. President of the European Council, Charles Michel. Michael Ryan, WHO CEO's at GCHQ-UK, NSA-USA and Bilderberg Group, all CEOs, Monarchies, and Members. Convicted Defendant Pandemic Vaccine Programs: Global Alliance Vaccine Initiative (GAVI), CEPI, Pandemic Vaccine Program United States of America, Operation Warp Speed and successor Pandemic Vaccine Program. World Health Organization COVAX, Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program People's Republic of China, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control. Russian Federation, Rospotrebnadzor. Convicted Genocidal Vaccination Entities: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, The Pirbright Institute. Above named criminal defendants are ordered by the International Tribunal to be immediately arrested and incarcerated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses evidence suggesting that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a natural occurrence but rather a deliberate release of a respiratory pathogen. They highlight a publication by the World Health Organization from September 2019 that mentions a world exposure to a respiratory pathogen. The speaker also mentions a report by Moderna, a pharmaceutical company, which reveals a payment of $400 million to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) for a royalty-bearing license agreement. They argue that this payment indicates a corrupt relationship between NIAID, led by Anthony Fauci, and the perpetrators of the outbreak. The speaker criticizes the lack of action from Congress and governors in addressing these issues. They also discuss a study conducted at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which involved the engineering of a synthetic clone of the virus. The speaker accuses NIAID and other institutions of being part of a criminal conspiracy and calls for the public to share this information widely.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You'll see that on September of 2019, and I'll just move enough so you can see the the cover of the World Health Organization publication, you see that if by September of 2019, not only did they know what we were gonna get, we actually have the picture of the coronavirus right there on the cover of the September 2019 issue of A World at Risk published by the World Health Organization. And in the not so fine print in the early pages of that report, we find out that we are going to have a world exposure to an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. Now, ladies and gentlemen, there is an operative term that's important to actually highlight in the sentence that is in their document from September of 2019, and the word was release. It's funny how the media continues to insist that there was either a leak or somehow a natural zoonotic transfer, but nobody is bothering to read the actual words written by the perpetrators themselves, which said, release. You know what that means? Somebody with intent let it out. This is not a Oops, it got away. This is a word that they used and the word that they used was release of a respiratory pathogen. But now we have to sit back and say, Well, Dave, release of a respiratory pathogen, who would have anything to gain from that? And conveniently conveniently, the Moderna report that just came out helped us clarify the what and the why. And I'm gonna go ahead and add this to the stream with enough screen resolution that hopefully some of you can see it. I will also post the link into the chat on the YouTube channel and on wherever else anybody can share it, because it's helpful to make sure that you see it straight from the horse's mouth. It turns out that if we look at precisely what Moderna said in its recently published report. It said the cost of sales was 1,900,000,000 or 39% of product sales for the Q4 of 2022, including third party royalties of $604,000,000, of which $400,000,000 related to a catch up payment to the National Institute of Allergy Infectious Disease for a new Royalty Bearing License Agreement executed in December. I want you to stop and read what is on this screen right now. Moderna is paying NIAID Anthony Fauci's organization, which, by the way, executed a royalty bearing license in December. That's before Anthony Fauci went off on his merry way where $400,000,000 was paid to NIAID for a new royalty bearing relationship, and the agreement provides for a low single digit royalty on future COVID COVID Injection Sales. Ladies and gentlemen, this is exactly the racketeering, the pump and dump. This is exactly the racketeering, the entire now Ponzi scheme, that we can add to all the other crimes that I've been talking about since the beginning of this pandemic. And lo and behold, in black and white, we have an unambiguous statement that says that We The People are now paying out of the royalties. We are paying NIAID, Anthony Fauci's own organization, $400,000,000 for the privilege of having a sole source contract provided by none other than the perpetrators of this particular outbreak. And the news is that no one in Congress, not a single person in Congress, Not Ron Johnson, not Rand Paul, not Ron Paul, not anybody, not any governor, nobody in any party, Republican or Democrat, is taking this particular issue head on. But the criminals are promoting and laughing in our face while we sit there and watch them state explicitly that they are now paying the kickback for the deal that they got. So that's the incentive. But this is where we need to actually Take a Step Back Down Memory Lane and do some really hard examination. And this show is going to be that hard examination. Now I have made reference to this article more times than I can count. And what's important to realize about this particular article if You're not paying attention, and once again, I will post the link because it's important for me to have all the references. I'll post the link here in the chat. But the article that I'm gonna call your attention to is one that requires me to move myself off the screen so that I can talk you through it as much as I can on the format that we have here. I encourage you to have a look at this entire document in its full grandeur. But for the time being, let's have a look at what this is. Let's start with the language of the title. The language of the title that says, scars like WIV1 COV poised for human emergence. And then what I'd like you to do is I'd like you to read the very small print that actually lives down here. That this article was received for review on September 4th 2015 and it was approved for printing on January 6, 2016. So we have a period of roughly 4 plus or minus months, during which time this was under review. And remember, this was under review during the Gain of Function moratorium, that wonderful pause in doing gain of function research that that apparently Ron Paul still has in is entire interactions with Anthony Fauci. No ability to actually hold Fauci accountable for. But during that gain of function moratorium, what happened was there was a selection of pathogens brought over from China and what we found in a preliminary review of those, those particular pathogens, we found out that WIV1, right here you see WIV1, that is Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 COV spike, are poised to emerge in the human population and, due to the efficient replication, in primary human airway epithelial cell cultures. Now, what's important about that? We said we were gonna have an accident or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. And it turns out that the spike protein modification that was part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 COV, happened to do a great job of replicating and infecting human airway epithelial cells. But here's where it gets really fun. And we're gonna go ahead and just pop up to the wonderful sentence that we have here, which is, Using the SARS CoV Infectious Clones as a Template. But stop with that. Using SARS CoV infectious clones this is not a product derived from nature this is a synthetic clone we designed and synthesized a full length infectious clone of WIV1 COV. And you should ask me right now, Dave, who's the we in this conversation? Who's the we that is building an infectious clone of WIV1 COV, including all of the terrible Components that we know make it infectious. And the answer is that it is in fact the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill. And we also did it by actually adding, check this out, a SARS spike protein that was replaced with the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 spike protein within the mouse adapted backbone of the model. Let's stop and get this really clear. The thing that killed Americans and continues to kill Americans was engineered from an infectious clone. It was not a naturally occurring phenomenon. It was in fact something that by their own admission was engineered and not in China. It was engineered in the United States. And why are no members of Congress why are no governors willing to have this conversation? Well, the answer is very simple. You don't get to the internal pat on the back and cash in the pocket deal that we just saw with Moderna and that we've seen for over a decade with UNC Chapel Hill if you actually investigate the real source. Because if you investigated the real source, you'd realize that NIH and NIAID and the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health are all part of the criminal conspiracy that gave rise to this problem as evidenced by the $400,000,000 payment I just showed you. But let's get a little bit further into this. This is really cool. We wanted this to be replicatable in human epithelial cells. We didn't want it in a mouse model, we wanted it in humans. Next, we wanted to determine if the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 CoV replication potential and models of the human lung. Previous examination of WAV 1 COV recovered from bat samples demonstrated poor replication. However, replication of epidemic SARS is also poor in this cell type, potentially due to the ACE2 receptor Expression Levels. Therefore, well differentiated primary human airway epithelial cells were infected with the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 mouse adapted pathogen and WIV1 CoV and SARS CoV Urbani and SARS CoV MA15. And at the time of 24 and 48 hours post infection, both WIV 1 MA fifteen and WIV one COV produced robust infection in human airway epithelial cells. And then we get the smoking gun. Then we put it in vivo. What does that mean? That means that we actually put a known infectious manufactured clone of a known to be harmful to human lungs Into Living Animals. And we did it where? Not inside of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. We did it at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill in violation of all of the statutes prohibiting the work on amplifying biologic agents for the purpose of weaponizing them against humanity. These are criminal admissions of violations of 18 US code and to date not a single member of Congress, not a single attorney general, not a single prosecutor anywhere in this country, not a single governor. No one is willing to have the courage and or fortitude to actually look at the published admissions. Published admissions, that are right here on the page in front of you. Now you can sit back and say, But Dave, did they really know they were doing something wrong. Well, the answer I hate to break it to you is that they did. Not only did they, they were very specific in saying what they did was actually a problem. But I want you to look very carefully at the fact that the construction of the chimeric SARS like viruses were done and designed using published sequences based on the SARS CoV infectious clone. Why is that important? That's important because this was not drawn from nature. It was not sampled from nature. It was not derived from nature. This was manufactured in the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Laboratories. The synthetic, enchimeric, mutant, full length WIV1 was done there and approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee that's a problem. Let's go on to look at the other problems. We actually have in vivo infection massive problem. But let's look at the one that I like the most Let's read these 2 beautiful admissions right here Biosafety and Biosecurity. Reported studies were initiated after the University of North Carolina institutional biosafety committee approved the experimental protocol project titled generating infectious clones of bat SARS like COVs, Lab Safety Plan, etcetera, etcetera. These studies were initiated before the US government deliberative process research funding pause on selected gain of function research involving influenza, MERS, and SARS. That, by the way, is the gain of function moratorium. It's just the whole length of it under the public health description of that moratorium. And the current paper has been reviewed by the funding agency. You know what that means? NIAID. They read it. They reviewed it. They approved the publication of this and the protocol that was done. And then let's look at what they say next. Continuation of these studies has been requested and approved by NIH. In other words, not only did Anthony Fauci knowingly and willfully lie in violation of federal law in Congress. But Anthony Fauci continued these studies and requested additional studies and it says it right in black and white. And then we read the last acknowledgement. We thank doctor Zhengli Xi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to the bat COV Sequences and plasma of the WIV 1 CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under the awards blah blah blah to RSB. Who's RSB? Who is RSB? Who was the one who was the agent who was then selected in January February of 2020 to mislead the world in declaring that SARS CoV 2 was a novel. Never seen it before, never knew about it before, never could have been done before. Who did we ask to make sure that we got the designation that the SARS CoV-two was novel? Oh, that's right, The Very Criminal That Created It. It's like asking a murderer to be the one who assesses the ballistics study on the gun and on the bullet, and wondering if there's any motivation that that murderer might have to do something, I don't know, untoward with that kind of analysis. Ladies and gentlemen, this isn't a, I wonder how we're gonna get to the bottom of it conversation. And I'm actually embarrassed at the Republican Party in the House right now for the fact that they continue they continue to pretend like they are somehow placating this giant public need to get to the bottom of this story when not a single one of them has the decency and integrity of actually looking at the facts. Not one of them. No one is willing to address this, and it is not just that they're not willing to address that. They are actively suppressing it by pretending that they're going to do an investigation with the Department of Energy Research that comes up with this pollyannish description of a low confidence interval on anything. We're we've got a problem. We've got a problem. And the problem that is happening right now is that we are being duped into believing there's accountability, and it's worse. It is worse to cover up the crime when you know it's a crime than to actually do so in ignorance. And that is the reason why I'm calling out the House investigation right now on coronavirus and on SARS CoV 2. They are willfully misleading the public into the illusion of doing anything that is ultimately substantive. And the reason they're doing it is because they can't afford the political cost of calling into question the ultimate criminal racket that has pervaded this country since 1980. The criminal racket of captive agencies, captive federal government authorized agencies, which are captive federal funded agencies who are willing with impunity to get into organized crime rackets with state universities and other universities for the economic benefit of those institutions to criminally conspire to create pathogens known to harm humans. And since the passage of the Bayh Dole Act in 1980, the entirety of this racketeering position has been known, has been promoted, has been has been evidenced time and time again. And to date, no member of Congress has had the integrity to tell the American people that we need to shut down that criminal racket. That's why they're not willing to talk about it. That's why as much as you can talk about, well, there should be a conversation on Tucker Carlson or on Joe Rogan, neither Tucker Carlson nor Joe Rogan have the Courage to take on this topic. Because this topic strikes at the heart of the criminal racket that is not just behind COVID nineteen. This strikes at the criminal racket of the way in which we administer the captured public agency and public institution funding mechanisms in this country. And if you'd go after that, you wouldn't get reelected because it turns out that you need to have that money supply flowing back into states if you want to get elected. And there is no question that the reason why no one is willing to have this conversation is because it's too hot to handle, which is the reason why I'm having this conversation. The fact of the matter is We The People are currently subject to a criminal conspiracy that is ongoing right now. The evidence is right in front of our face. There is no ambiguity. And for every person who took and was injured by a shot, I want you to know this very clearly. Moderna just paid NIAID a $400,000,000 kickback so that they could have the privilege of injecting an experimental gene therapy into you. The fact of the matter is We have the evidence, you now have it, and it is incumbent on each and every one of you to do the right thing. Share this on every platform you can share it. Share it on your YouTubes, on your Twitters, on your LinkedIns, on all of the different platforms you have. Share it, share it, share it, and see if anybody actually gives a rip. Because I do, but I'm not sure that anybody else does. And it's now time to see if we can actually push this message into a place where it can be heard alongside of the lies that were promoted today by the Republican Party saying they were gonna hold people accountable for a China lab leak story. Well, not one of them not one of them even suggested that maybe the investigations should start close to home.
tomselliott
Posted - June 9, 2023 at 11:52 AM
Saved - June 6, 2024 at 4:45 AM

@tomselliott - Tom Elliott

Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 4 Anthony Fauci, America's Covid Disinformation Agent https://t.co/ufbdGBpG25

Video Transcript AI Summary
Critics question the effectiveness of masks and the handling of the pandemic. Dr. Fauci defends his decisions and denies funding gain-of-function research. The origins of COVID-19 are debated, with conflicting reports on a lab leak. Mental health concerns for children due to school closures are raised. Dr. Fauci clashes with Senator Paul over gain-of-function research. The debate continues on the virus's origins and research funding.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're really criticizing science because I represent science. If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting. That is true. That is correct, Chris. It'll need to protect you completely against infection, and the chances are very likely that you'll not be able to transmit it to other people. The risk is extremely low of transmitting it to anybody else. Full stock vaccinated people are clearly capable of transmitting the infection. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it. I often myself wear 2 masks. Speaker 1: And I'm quoting you now. At the population level, masks work at the margins maybe 10%. To hear that they only work at the margins maybe 10% would make a lot of people ask, okay, then why was I wearing a mask? Speaker 0: You're really attacking not only doctor Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science when you say that this is gonna go away tomorrow like magic when you know that there's no chance it's gonna just disappear. We hope this just goes away, burns itself out. Speaker 1: So my question is why weren't you straight with the American people about this to begin with? Speaker 0: So the bottom line is it's a guesstimate. I gave a range. Speaker 1: It seemed in that quote to suggest that you were basing your, your recommendation on polling and what people could accept. Is that not what you meant? Speaker 0: No. I mean, it's it's a bit of that. Speaker 1: We're seeing all of these school closures around the country. Is that the right move for children and families? Speaker 2: Yeah. No. Speaker 0: And I think what's going on right now is is generally an appropriate approach. You wanna start doing something to socially distance yourself. How dramatic that is, closing schools and doing other things should be proportionate. It went too far that particularly for kids, who who couldn't go to school except remotely, that it's forever damaged. Well, I don't think it's forever irreparably damaged anyone. Speaker 3: The US surgeon general has called it an urgent public health crisis, a decline in the mental health of kids across the country. According to the CDC, the rates of suicide, self harm, anxiety, and depression are up among adolescents. Speaker 0: And the record will show, Neil, that we didn't recommend shutting everything down. First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down, and that was very difficult decision because I knew it would have serious economic consequences, which it did. Yeah. Because if you look at the people that are politicizing me, they're somebody that all the way over on one level. But there are a lot of other people who look upon me the way they should as a nonpolitical person that I am. They're not doing it because they say they don't wanna do it. They're Republicans. They don't like to be told what to do. Right. And we gotta break that. But now is the time to do what you're told. Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab? Was it man made? When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market. Speaker 3: Place of origin was not within the market itself. No. I don't Speaker 0: think you could say that. Speaker 4: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China. Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute. Speaker 2: We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in the lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one. Speaker 5: Take an animal virus and you increase the responsibility to humans. Right. You're saying that's not gain a phone? Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 5: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals, and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function? Speaker 0: It is not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I have to laugh at that. I should be prosecuted.
KimDotcom
Posted - June 17, 2023 at 5:44 PM
Saved - June 17, 2023 at 8:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Records show that Ben Hu, likely patient zero for COVID-19, was funded by Fauci and USAID for dangerous GainOfFunction experiments in Wuhan. Fauci lied under oath. The US Govt is responsible for COVID-19 and unsafe vaccines. This is the biggest crime against humanity in history. Those responsible must be arrested and jailed, and the US Govt must pay reparations.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is big: Records obtained in a lawsuit against NIH prove that Ben Hu, COVIDs likely patient zero, was funded directly by Anthony Fauci, @NIH and @USAID to conduct dangerous #GainOfFunction experiments in Wuhan. Fauci lied under oath. Please seek prosecution @SenRandPaul

@WhiteCoatWaste - White Coat Waste Project 🥼🗑️

@NIH @USAID 🧾We've got the receipts: Here is the NIH document obtained via a 2021 WCW lawsuit proving that COVIDs likely "Patient Zero" Ben Hu was receiving US tax $ from @NIH & @USAID (Via EcoHealth) for #GainOfFunction animal experiments at the Wuhan lab👇 https://blog.whitecoatwaste.org/2023/06/15/covid-origin-wcw-investigation-proves-u-s-govt-funded-patient-zero/

COVID Origin: WCW investigation proves U.S. Govt Funded “Patient Zero” If lead Wuhan white coat Ben Hu is patient zero, then White Coat Waste Project's investigation reveals the origin of COVID. blog.whitecoatwaste.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is no longer a "conspiracy theory". The US Govt is responsible for #Covid19, millions of deaths and millions of people damaged by unsafe vaccines. Every family that lost someone and every person who suffered now has definitive proof that the US Govt did this to you.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is the biggest crime against humanity in the history of the world. The US Govt killed more people with Covid-19 than the Nazis killed Jews during the holocaust. Those responsible need to be arrested and jailed. The US Govt must be shamed around the world and pay reparations.

VigilantFox
Posted - July 29, 2023 at 9:05 PM
Saved - August 1, 2023 at 7:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Robert Kennedy Jr. reveals Fauci's $150K/year benefit from Moderna vaccine. NIH profits from the vaccine they developed, while Fauci's associates hold patent rights, earning them lifelong income. Fauci's false statements to Congress, as stated by Senator Rand Paul, should lead to prosecution. Watch Kennedy's censored interview here: [link]. Moderna's patented sequence matches the spike protein's genetic code, a one-in-a-billion occurrence. Share to raise awareness.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@RobertKennedyJr Exposes Fauci’s $150K/Year Perk from the Moderna Vaccine “NIH is collecting billions of dollars on the Moderna vaccine, which they developed. And people who work for Tony Fauci, four to six individuals who work for them have margin rights for those patents so that they will collect now $150,000 a year for life. And their children and heirs will collect that money as long as that vaccine is being sold.” ------------------------------ 🔁 Retweet to help awaken the masses.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you do something that that offends the pharmaceutical industry or interferes with its, profit taking, you're gonna be punished in those agencies. Conversely, the individuals who are reliably in the tank with the industry, who are carrying water for them, People like Anthony Fauci are people who rise inexorably to the top and then remain there for generation. So, you know, here you have a public official who's been there for 50 years. The highest paid official in the United States government, much higher paid than the president of the United States. And he's there for one reason, because he knows how to serve agency ambition. He's taken that agency that was the gold standard for scientific research and essentially abandoned the mission of trying to figure out why are Americans so sick and adopted instead a new mission, which is to develop, to be an incubator for pharmaceutical drugs for the agency. And when it develops those drugs at NIH and that forms them out to a foreign company, it gets collect royalties. So NIH is collecting 1,000,000,000 of dollars on the Moderna vaccine which they developed. And people who work for Tony Fauci, 4 to 6 individuals who work for them and march in rights for those patents so that they will collect now 150 $1,000 a year for life, and their children and heirs will collect that money as long as that vaccine is being sold. Oh, you have an agency where that the, you know, that that has the that has these commercial, you know, benefits that have overwhelmed their regulatory functions. And, you know, Now if you're if you're gonna get $150,000 a year for life and you are the regulator, do you think you're really gonna be regulating, or are you gonna be promoting?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Curiously, Moderna's patented sequence in 2016 is a DIRECT MATCH for part of the genetic code in the spike protein. "Some scientists did a study on the likelihood of that occurring: one in a billion. One in a billion!" exclaimed attorney @RenzTom.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Moderna's patent for the spike protein's genetic code is a rare occurrence, with a likelihood of 1 in a billion. While patents don't always indicate usage, this particular patent matches a portion of the spike protein's genetic code. This coincidence is quite surprising.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that is not commonly known but I think is very critical is You know that that Moderna company? Well, I don't love patents always as evidence because having a patent doesn't mean that you've used a patent But, In this particular case the Moderna patent is a genetic match for part of the genetic code in the spike protein? Some scientists did a study on the likelihood of that occurring 1 in a 1,000,000,000. 1 in a 1,000,000,000. Shocking coincidence

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RenzTom @RobertKennedyJr's interview with @JamesOKeefeIII was censored and taken down by YouTube, but you can still watch it here: https://t.co/an7yZu8Nw4

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Fauci lied under oath to Congress, attests Senator @RandPaul. "It's a felony to lie to Congress, and he should be prosecuted." https://t.co/G8ucRe7JmP

P_McCulloughMD
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 7:57 PM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 4:41 AM

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™

Fauci Lied to Trump on Viral Origins and Aspects of Pandemic - America Out Loud News. Administration will have to find a way to deal with this reality. Many suffered from both the illness and govt pandemic response measures. ⁦@OutLoudNews⁩

Fauci Lied to Trump on Viral Origins and Aspects of Pandemic How will Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump come to reckon with the reality he was lied to about the origins of SARS-CoV-2, misled on contagion, and badly deceived on vaccine safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.? On March 6, 2023, B93, The Online Reporter noted: "As it turned out, those emails date back to 2020, and eight weeks later, Fauci stood next to US President Donald Trump at a White House press... americaoutloud.news
JohnStossel
Posted - October 24, 2023 at 3:25 PM
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 11:10 PM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

.@RandPaul was once labeled a “conspiracy theorist” for saying a lab leak probably caused Covid. Now the FBI and Energy Department say it's likely. Here he explains how Anthony Fauci and other officials tried to COVER UP the origin to protect their reputations and funding: https://t.co/rFIhej59BS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gain of function research funded by the NIH in a lab in Wuhan is under scrutiny. Senator Rand Paul accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of funding the lab, which was initially criticized by the media. However, the NIH now admits to funding risky research in Wuhan. The theory that COVID-19 originated from a lab leak gains traction as evidence suggests it came from the lab, not animals. Lab leaks have happened before, and the FBI and Department of Energy support the lab leak theory. Gain of function research involves making viruses stronger, but its effectiveness in creating vaccines is questionable. The media's lack of curiosity about the origins of COVID-19 is concerning. The NIH continues to fund gain of function research, posing a potential risk to humanity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gain of function research was going on in that lab and NIH funded it. Speaker 1: Remember when senator Rand Paul accused Anthony Fauci of funding China's Wuhan virus lair? Speaker 2: I totally resent the lie that you are now propagating. Speaker 1: The media immediately criticized senator Paul? Rand Paul, stop it. You look like an idiot. Speaker 3: Doctor Anthony Fauci blasting senator Rand Paul. Speaker 2: Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 1: Out? Anthony Fauci once again forced to call Rand Paul a sniveling moron, but some now have changed major shifts. NIH admits funding risky research in Wuhan? Paul might have been on to something. Speaker 0: To me, it's not so much about them admitting or apologizing. It's really about trying to prevent this happening again in the future. Speaker 1: Paul also pushed the then controversial idea that COVID began with a lab leak. Speaker 0: All the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab you there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab including yourself Speaker 1: did COVID leak from this lab which dead experiments funded by the US government? The media told us, no. COVID came from an animal. Speaker 3: The working theory is someone butchered a bat came into contact with its blood or urine and then touched his or her nose or mouth. Speaker 1: Everybody was saying came from animals, from bats. Speaker 0: I initially was there too in the beginning reports of 80,000 animals being tested no animals with it Speaker 1: no animals with COVID but Speaker 0: we know that 3 people in the Wuhan lab got sick with a virus of unknown origin in November of 2019 Speaker 1: and that was more than a 1000 kilometers away from where bats live? Exactly. Not only that, lab leaks are common. Speaker 0: Accents do happen. Labs in Singapore, Taiwan, and China accidentally infected themselves with SARS. Speaker 1: SARS escaped from labs, so did smallpox, anthrax and flu? Now the FBI and others agree with senator Paul. Speaker 3: The Department of Energy has concluded COVID nineteen likely came from a lab leak in China. Speaker 1: So evil Chinese scientists in a lab funded by America? Speaker 0: America funded it and I think it was, maybe not done it with evil intentions. It was done with misguided notion that gain a function research was safe Speaker 1: gain a function research that can mean making viruses stronger Speaker 0: they sometimes create viruses that don't exist in nature that are now more infectious they've gained the function of lethality or infectiousness By being combined in a lab. They're Speaker 1: trying to find ways to stop diseases. Speaker 0: But many scientists have now looked at this and said, been doing this kind of function research for quite a while. The likelihood that you create something that creates a vaccine that's going to help anybody is pretty slim to none. Speaker 1: The media is weirdly uncurious about this? Speaker 0: We have a disease that killed maybe 16,000,000 people worldwide, about a 1000000 people in America, And they're not curious as to how we got it. You're trying to obscure responsibility for 4,000,000 people dying around the world from a pandemic. Speaker 1: Senator Paul details his arguments in this new book, Deception, The Great COVID Hover Up. It points out that Fauci once justified the risks of gain of function research? Speaker 0: He said 2012, even if a pandemic occurs, if a scientist becomes infected and the community becomes infected, the knowledge is worth it. Well, that's a judgment call, and I would say there's probably 16,000,000 families around the world who might disagree with that now. Speaker 1: Doctor Fauci didn't give your money directly to the Chinese lab. He gave it to a nonprofit called EcoHealth. Speaker 4: EcoHealth Alliance is working on the ground to stem between you and the next pandemic. Speaker 1: EcoHealth Alliance. Most Americans haven't heard of it? Speaker 0: They were able to, accumulate maybe over $100,000,000 in US taxpayer dollars, and a lot of it was funneled to Wuhan. Speaker 1: Ecohealth is run by zoologist Peter Dzczak? Speaker 4: Set our sights on the next pandemic. We can stop it emerging. We can save lives. Speaker 1: Before the pandemic, DayZach bragged about combining coronaviruses in Wuhan in hopes of creating a vaccine. Speaker 4: My colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you look you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells, and each step of this, You move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic and beat. Speaker 0: The spread of a new deadly disease. Speaker 1: Once COVID broke out, day Zack was less eager to talk about the experiments he funded Speaker 0: Peter day Zack has refused to reveal his communications with the Wuhan lab and I do think that ultimately there is a great deal of culpability on his part Speaker 1: in addition dezak and Fauci got other scientists to sign this letter published in a prestigious medical journal saying they Speaker 3: strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID nineteen does not have a natural origin. Speaker 0: They squelched all dissent and said you're a conspiracy theorist if you're saying this but they didn't reveal that they had a monetary self incentive to cover this up Speaker 1: we asked Staszak to answer the claims in this video he didn't respond Speaker 0: to give you an example of who he is and how the money changes hand This is a guy who has $15,000 cocktail parties at the Cosmo Club in DC, invites Anthony Fauci and others there for cocktails. Speaker 2: They're really criticizing science because I represent science. Speaker 0: I think he is the defender of the funding of science, the business of science. Speaker 1: And what about the NIH run by our government they are still funding gain of function research Speaker 0: yeah absolutely this is a risk to civilization Because we could wind up with a virus that's 50% lethal that leaks out of a lab and kills half of the planet.
drsimonegold
Posted - October 25, 2023 at 7:46 AM
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 5:34 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

We heard a lot about disinformation during the pandemic. The greatest purveyor of disinformation by far was Dr. Fauci, and he must be held accountable. https://t.co/VkX9p6Y1iD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The speaker disagrees with the idea that wearing masks is the best way to prevent infectious diseases. They mention that getting vaccinated provides the best protection against infection. The speaker also addresses the misconception that vaccines can make people worse. They mention the possibility of future challenges in infectious diseases and the need for rapid response to new threats. The speaker denies funding gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and denies lying before Congress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is counting people. Do you agree? Speaker 1: Best way for me to prevent getting an infectious disease is what? Wearing a mask? No. No. No. Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. Should you be wearing 2 masks or 1 mask. There's nothing wrong with people wearing 2 masks. Can we make a general that doesn't have scientific basis yet? No. Please wear a mask. The optimal degree of protection, what you get Infection is to get vaccinated. Well, if she got the flu for 14 days, she's as protected as anybody can be because the best vaccination is to get infected Did yourself. If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about Getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting it. The risk is extremely low of getting infected, of getting sick, or of transmitting it to anybody else. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci says he has COVID again for the 2nd time in 2 weeks. Speaker 1: Does the vaccine make you worse? What well, the latter part of what you just said is untrue. You don't get worse results from vaccinating. So worst Possible thing you could do is vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually make them worse. No question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, But also there will be a surprise outbreak. But also there will be a surprise outbreak. Anyway, so let me just go on about NIH lifts funding pause on gain of function research. I don't think this is gonna be foolproof. Things are gonna slip through. Thing that I Aspirationally, hope to be able to encounter is the ability to rapidly respond to something brand new, Whether it's a brand new pandemic or, as you mentioned, a brand new a brand new attack upon us deliberately by Bioterror, A brand new attack upon us deliberately by BioTerror. We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute A virology. Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress.
MattWallace888
Posted - October 31, 2023 at 11:51 PM
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 11:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Anthony Fauci's lab in the US reportedly conducted experiments on a coronavirus strain from China before the global outbreak. This raises questions about his transparency. Some speculate that he intentionally released the virus to gain power and wealth. Fauci's net worth surged during the pandemic, despite his government salary. Should he face consequences for potential crimes against humanity? Investigation is warranted.

@MattWallace888 - Matt Wallace

🚨JUST IN: Anthony Fauci-run lab in the United States experimented with a coronavirus strain shipped in from China more than a year before the global outbreak. HE WAS LYING THE ENTIRE TIME IN AN ATTEMPT TO COVER THAT UP!!!!!!!!! This absolutely opens up the door to the possibility that Fauci intentionally released the virus into the public to increase global government power and enrich himself. INVESTIGATE HIM NOW! The Fauci’s net worth jumped up millions during Covid despite him being on a government salary ⚠️ SHOULD ANTHONY FAUCI BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE FOR HIS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY?

NickHudsonCT
Posted - January 10, 2024 at 6:37 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 6:59 PM

@NickHudsonCT - Nick Hudson

Many skeptics will be celebrating the exposure of Faucian nonsense & lying in this testimony. I AM NOT! It is because the skeptic movement’s loudest voices are those who missed the intrinsic scam of Covid from the start that we end up here, omitting all the crucial questions. /1

@COVIDSelect - Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic

🚨DR. FAUCI TESTIMONY TAKEAWAYS🚨 @COVIDSelect has completed a two-day, 14-hour transcribed interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci. Here are the most important highlights from DAY 2 of his testimony👇

NestCommander
Posted - April 3, 2024 at 2:08 AM
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 3:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fauci's alleged lies about funding gain of function research and discrepancies between public statements and private concerns are causing controversy. Claims are made about the dangers of gain of function research and its potential to cause pandemics. The ODNI's report on the origin of COVID-19 is criticized for breaking the law and protecting gain of function research. The defunding of grants awarded to Dr. Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance is mentioned. There are concerns about bias in peer review.

@NestCommander - Kevin W. McCairn PhD

https://twitter.com/vigilantfox/status/1686198223763853312 Fauci lied under oath “not funding gain of function (GOF) research” https://twitter.com/charlesrixey/status/1728099199772762618 Email: https://twitter.com/texaslindsay_/status/1679838118743097348 GOF under another name: https://twitter.com/s_q_e_r_l/status/1392429082370002946 Even under their own standards for published results. https://twitter.com/r_h_ebright/status/1704641787380298152 Fauci directly offshore GOF. https://twitter.com/hansmahncke/status/1752063214769377292 https://twitter.com/r_h_ebright/status/1633624833081884674 https://twitter.com/schwinn3/status/1457368942272565255 Another discrepancy between public propaganda plans and private concerns. https://twitter.com/covidselect/status/1730198241428275213 Flip-flop with masks is the least of his worries. https://twitter.com/covidselect/status/1730198245626769905 See replies for his past lies. https://twitter.com/covidselect/status/1730198247971373554 More about Fauci: https://twitter.com/covidselect/status/1732078538033971626 “Fauci's legacy is as honorable as this NIAID report he was obligated to release under a FOIA lawsuit is “packed with information”...” https://twitter.com/williewwilliam/status/1730356526424932620 Fauci lied, people died. https://twitter.com/covidselect/status/1730198247971373554 FOIA stuff: https://twitter.com/thackerpd/status/1412369872487698432 Yes. They are really there defending GOF research and their grave COI making them wholly opposed of even the idea that a pandemic can ever be initiated by virology research. http://bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rapid-responses… https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1712998816356643194 You can only have GoF work generate a viable prediction or a vaccine if the next emergence is of the exact same genetic makeup as your GOF strain. The extreme diversity of viruses mean that you have (total number of viruses in the world (billions)*probability that a GOF study result being used maliciously (>1/200 minimum)) times higher likelihood that GOF research cause a pandemic in stead of preventing it. http://archive.ph/BToZR http://archive.md/YYIXp http://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/109663743902085653… https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1713099142841729200 https://twitter.com/Daoyu15/status/1725182075656155186 The ODNI both broke the law and is full of elementary mistakes in their “report”. That is why it can’t be trusted. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1725274033103491368 As on why? https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1725276084965380325 They need to protect GOF at all costs. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1725182099232305536 More hidden experiments. https://twitter.com/0rf/status/1594467737744465920?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… Covid origin declassification act violation of the ODNI. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1724626293403373877?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… "Former Acting Assistant Secretary of State Thomas DiNanno tells [Sky News]…that when his team unearthed explosive evidence that pointed to a laboratory leak…, the intelligence community ran interference in support of a natural origin narrative." https://twitter.com/r_h_ebright/status/1729164212159824154?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSAw… GOF is only for dual-use bioweapons research and are never useful for any kind of vaccine or therapeutics. Stop lying. https://twitter.com/Daoyu15/status/1682701118655303680 https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1679461360164552705 Here is clearly KGA never ruling out even engineering. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1690480261103034368 And unfortunately, the first use of the prefusion-stabilized Spike was to target MERS-CoV and WIV1 wasn’t the drive of the patent, nor did the patent required any GOF research. Also, the vaccines are now proven to be hazardous, driving unending waves of reinfections. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1691993269847413159 https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1691993693258186857 https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1724491689124065595?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… Not even Tedros consider their claimed conclusions valid. https://twitter.com/drtedros/status/1724132394662252877?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… Unanimously, they passed a law banning all NIH ePPP GOF funding. https://twitter.com/justinrgoodman/status/1724621384305742069?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… Numerous problems of the ODNI “report”. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1724626293403373877?s=46&t=wRQSWp_1VffWmS2vKQwhSA… https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1738419581080010945 Red-faced and looking extremely anxious, Dr. Peter Daszak, President of EcoHealth Alliance, testified today in a closed hearing about the #OriginOfCovid. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1725480788861559101 Following his testimony, the House of Representatives unanimously voted to defund two active grants awarded to him. https://twitter.com/fermentillc/status/1724744680183611631 https://twitter.com/drhermiz/status/1724620221464424608 https://twitter.com/justinrgoodman/status/1724597207741902969 Including additional approved bills that cuts all DOD funding to the EHA as well. https://twitter.com/Bryce_Nickels/status/1730668384583299361 Evidently, the secret bioweapons department of the U.S. wasn’t happy on this resolution. https://twitter.com/BlackTomThePyr8/status/1730674382580678812 But even they agreed that bat CoV GOF work involving China as a region or using the WIV is too risky to continue putting DOD money on. https://twitter.com/justinrgoodman/status/1732740769071423590 https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1732967051617288443 https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1733530016695386345 Like touching a fire and got burned. https://twitter.com/daoyu15/status/1732968216706842766

@Biorealism - Holtz

Editors likely blocked lab origin papers and waved through terrible papers like Proximal Origin to avoid jearpardizing relationships with the NIH, virology colleagues and China. Richard A. Muller found his virology colleagues were afraid to even discuss the lab origin scenario.

@NestCommander - Kevin W. McCairn PhD

https://gab.com/Flavinkins/posts/108971775263920617 Massive status bias in peer review

Flavinkins on Gab: '@SteveStuWill “Massive status bias in peer revie…' Flavinkins on Gab: '@SteveStuWill “Massive status bias in peer review. 534 reviewers randomized to review the same paper revealing the low status, high status, or neither author. 65% reject low status, 23% reject high status. Amazing work by Juergen Huber and colleagues. #prc9” “Or, look at it another way. If the reviewers knew only the low status author, just 2% said to accept without revisions. If the reviewers knew only the high status author, almost 21% said to accept without revisions. I thought it was painful to have 25 reviewers for one of my papers. My condolences to these authors for having to read the comments from 534. Gratitude to Sabiou Inoua and Vernon Smith for subjecting themselves and their scholarly work to conduct this project.” “ Secondary finding. >3000 potential reviewers were invited with the low, high, or neither status author revealed as the corresponding author in the review invitation. Reviewers substantially more likely to agree to review in the high status revealed condition.” “Two important method notes: this journal offered to pay for review (explaining high agree rates maybe), and only those in the anonymous invite condition were then invited to the actual review with randomizing which author was revealed.” @BrianNosek “Here is a preprint to the paper: ” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4190976' gab.com
CartlandDavid
Posted - May 14, 2024 at 12:33 PM
Saved - May 14, 2024 at 5:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Newly released email implicates DARPA funding in the development of the COVID-19 virus, overseen by Peter Daszak and Ralph Baric. Join @CovidVaccineAdverseReactions for more updates.

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland

Nuremberg 2: New Inculpatory Evidence Reveals Darpa Funded Fauci's Team's Development of the Covid-19 Virus BREAKING — Newly released email reveals that the COVID-19 virus was developed as part of a DARPA grant overseen by Peter Daszak & Ralph Baric. Patrick Webb on X🔗 Join us👇 @CovidVaccineAdverseReactions

RepMTG
Posted - June 3, 2024 at 3:55 PM
Saved - June 3, 2024 at 7:47 PM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Democrats are calling us conspiracy theorists about Fauci and Covid. Here’s proof of Fauci’s lies. https://t.co/MzPK5zkE24

Video Transcript AI Summary
The origin of the virus is debated, with some suggesting a lab leak in China. The NIH denies funding gain of function research in Wuhan, but acknowledges funding research on a bat coronavirus. The debate centers on whether the research involved gain of function, which aims to increase transmissibility to humans. Accusations are exchanged, with one party claiming misinformation and the other calling for prosecution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab? Was it man made? When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market Place of origin was not within the market itself. No. I don't think you could say that. Speaker 1: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China. Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research Speaker 1: in the Wuhan Institute. We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in a lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one. Speaker 2: Take an animal virus and Speaker 0: you increase the trans ability to humans. Right. Speaker 2: You're saying that's not gain a phone? Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 2: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals, and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function? It is Speaker 0: not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I have to laugh at that. I should be prosecuted.
KimDotcom
Posted - June 3, 2024 at 6:33 PM
Saved - June 3, 2024 at 9:33 PM

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

The fall of Fauci. Covid-19 is officially exposed as a US Govt project. A virus engineered by US scientists using a bio lab in China for cover. The biggest crime against humanity killed more victims than the Nazi holocaust against the Jews. Demand Justice. https://t.co/xsFdNQiR0F

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Fauci was accused of failing in his leadership roles during the pandemic, allegedly covering up the lab leak theory and funding gain-of-function research. Testimonies revealed attempts to hide information, delete emails, and avoid transparency. The speaker criticized Fauci for prioritizing personal interests over public health, eroding trust in the public health system. The speaker vowed to seek accountability despite ongoing cover-up efforts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. You can be removed. Actually, you're not allowed to speak. Your time is expired. Take your Starbucks with you. Speaker 1: Mister Garcia, mister Raskin, you're out of line. Your times have expired. I now recognize doctor Jackson from Texas for 5 minutes of questions. Speaker 2: Thank you, mister chairman. Doctor Fauci, I have to say, I, as so many Americans, am deeply disappointed in your actions during a critical time in our nation's history while you were in key leadership roles as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and as the chief medical adviser to president Biden. Put quite simply, you failed miserably in my opinion. Based on all we have learned during the pandemic and all that we have since learned through this committee's work, I believe your failures stem from both an effort of self preservation manifested by a series of lies in cover up, and by a total failure of leadership. It was obvious to everyone that you and your organization, NIH, had a lot to lose if the American people were to discover that COVID 19 was most likely leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China, and that you via EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszick actually funded this research, and that this lab was actively and recklessly conducting gang of function research. As such you did everything in your power to deflect and cover up this possibility. You even recruited others to help you in this effort. Unfortunately, this cost our country and the world valuable time. Time that may have led to answers regarding the origin, may have blunted the spread, and would have almost certainly saved lives. While I think most of us have known all along what I just described, what I have been appalled to discover through sworn testimony to this committee, is the level of which you and those that worked for you went to cover up the obvious. Just a few examples, and I know these have been touched on, but they're important for everyone to hear. Doctor Lawrence Tabak, former acting director of NIH testified that under the generic definition that NIH did in fact fund gain of function research. This was based on a definition that was initially used by NIH and a definition that was abandoned and removed from the website in October of 2021 and replaced by a new much more detailed definition with a much higher bar that you have since conveniently used to define gain of function testing and to deny what doctor Tabak has since confirmed. He also said that EcoHealth Alliance failed to properly and promptly report that their research violated the terms of the grant. Something that went completely unaddressed under your watch. Doctor Moran's your senior advisor, who you have tried today to distance yourself from, but whose large volume of emails clearly demonstrate that you had a very close and personal relationship with and who reported to you directly has openly bragged about he how he subverted FOIA requests. I remind you that the law requires you and your former organization to comply with Freedom of Information Act request. It is not optional. If you or your employees or your organization that you oversaw were were systemically avoiding transparency and illegally hiding or destroying documents that rightfully belong to the American people, then you should be criminally charged and they should as well. In addition, doctor Gregory Fulkers, your chief of staff also engaged in illegal practices in which he crafted messages using symbols instead of letters to avoid FOIA exposure. In an email April 2020 from doctor Moran's to Peter Daszak, he says, quote, there are things I can't say. Oh, I wonder what he couldn't say. He also went on to say, quote, except Tony is aware and I have learned there are ongoing efforts within NIH to steer through this with minimal damage to you, Peter, and colleagues, and to NIH and NAID. End quote. And then a few days later, he said, quote, I have reason to believe that there are already efforts going on to protect you, end quote. In February of 2021, doctor Moran wrote to, Boston University scientist Gerald Kirsch saying, quote, I learned from our FOIA lady, hear how to make emails disappear after I'm foiled, but before the search starts. So I think we are all safe. End quote. Doctor Fauci, I wanna know what were you being protected from and what you needed to be safe from. I'm gonna go on because I have a little time here. He went on to say, quote, plus I deleted most of the earlier emails after sending to Gmail. Once again, illegal and an actual crime. Doctor Moran's noted in another email to doctor Kirsch saying, quote, I learned the tricks of the I learned the tricks last year from an old friend, Marge Moore, who heads our FOIA office and also hates foias. End quote. It is absolutely amazing to me that doctor Moran's and Marjorie Moore still have jobs and are taxpayers are still paying their salaries. Doctor Moranz wrote to doctor Daszak in April of 2021, quote, PS, I forgot to say there is no worry about Foyas. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private email or hand it to him to work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble. Apparent end quote. Apparently, you neglected to surround yourself with equally smart individuals. Doctor Moranz wrote to another collaborator, Peter Hotitz, in June 2021 at Baylor College of Medicine that he had deleted all his emails related to COVID origin when, quote, the shit hit the fan, end quote. He said, quote, I feel pretty sure Tony were too. The best way to avoid FOIA hassles is to delete all emails when you learn the subject is pretty sensitive. In October 2021, doctor Maranz wrote to Peter Daszak, quote, Peter, from Tony's numerous recent comments to me and from what Francis has been vocal about over the past 5 years, we are trying to protect you, and and they are protecting their own reputations as well, end quote. I'll just jump ahead. The the American people can rest assured that we are gonna continue to pursue answers, and we continue to push for full accountability from you and your colleagues despite continuing efforts to try to cover this up. Doctor Fauci, history will not be kind to you, and you will be known as the man who put his his personal interest before the interest of the American people, the very people that you were supposed to be protecting. Your actions along with several others we have had before this committee have completely eroded America's trust in our public health system and the agency that you represented for half a century. With that, I yield back. Speaker 1: Gentleman's time has expired and now
TheMilkBarTV
Posted - June 4, 2024 at 7:25 AM
Saved - June 4, 2024 at 2:42 PM

@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV

🚨Fauci's many lies, backflips & attempts to rewrite history to Congress... with receipts!👇👇 https://t.co/HB8AEEUfF1

Video Transcript AI Summary
We prioritize transparency and honesty. Vaccination reduces risk of COVID. No vaccine is 100% effective, but vaccines are highly efficacious. CDC guidelines recommend masks and social distancing. No study on masks for kids, but masks are advised. Lab leak theory not downplayed by me. Virus likely evolved in nature, not man-made. Criticism of me is criticism of science. It's not a simple yes or no answer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that we're going to do is to be completely transparent, open, and honest. Speaker 1: But we knew from the trials that people that got vaccinated still were subject to getting COVID. So was the COVID vaccine 100% effective? Speaker 0: If you're vaccinated, you don't have a risk, and that's the reason why we say it's as simple as black and white. You're vaccinated. You're safe. You're unvaccinated. You're at risk. Simple as that. I don't believe any vaccine 100% effective, virtually a 100% efficacious. If things go wrong, not point fingers. You know, the best PPE for the general public, if possible, right now, is to maintain the physical and social distancing. It actually came from the CDC. The CDC was responsible for those kinds of guidelines to schools, not me, and to make everything we do be based on science and evidence. What I meant by no science behind it is that there wasn't a controlled trial that said compare 6 foot with 3 feet with 10 feet. So there wasn't that scientific evaluation of it. Speaker 2: Mask mandates for children under 5. Speaker 0: When the children go out into the community, you want them to continue to wear masks. Speaker 2: Is there scientific evidence supporting that? Speaker 0: There was no study that did masks on kids before. You couldn't do the study. Speaker 3: Why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Speaker 0: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Speaker 3: An open mind. Speaker 4: Doctor Anthony Fauci is shooting down theories that the coronavirus was man made. He tells National Geographic everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that this virus evolved in nature and then jumped species. Speaker 3: Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Speaker 0: Not on my part. Really. Really. Speaker 4: Fauci added he does not believe another theory that the virus occurred naturally but was accidentally released into the public from a lab in China, telling Nat Geo that means it was in the wild to begin with. That's why I don't get what they're talking about. Speaker 0: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Speaker 5: You said you represent Speaker 0: science. But if they get up and really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci, well, people could recognize there's a person there. So it's easy to criticize. But they're really criticizing science because I represent science. Speaker 5: Do you represent science, mister Fauci? Speaker 6: Yes or no? Yes or no? Speaker 0: No. That's not a yes or no answer. Speaker 5: It's a yes or no. Speaker 0: I don't think it is. Speaker 5: Okay. Well, we'll take that as a you don't know what you represent.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - August 24, 2024 at 5:53 PM
Saved - August 24, 2024 at 7:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of discussions, Robert Kennedy Jr. outlines how Dr. Anthony Fauci became a key figure in U.S. biodefense after the Patriot Act in 2002, receiving significant funding for bioweapons research. He details the controversial gain-of-function experiments Fauci conducted, which faced backlash from scientists and led to a moratorium in 2014. Following this, Fauci allegedly shifted research to the Wuhan lab, raising concerns about U.S. taxpayer funding contributing to the origins of COVID-19. Kennedy expresses hope for change in health leadership.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

THREAD: @RobertKennedyJr explains how President Bush placed Dr. Anthony Fauci in charge of developing bioweapons for the Pentagon as part of the Patriot Act in 2002. In 2014, Obama shut down 18 of Fauci's gain-of-function experiments after lab leaks and 300 top scientists raised concerns about his dangerous experiments with "potential pandemic pathogens."

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#2 [QUICK AD] Ready to unlock the secrets of the 𝕏 algorithm, skyrocket your growth, and start monetizing? Join the first 200 students in The 𝕏 Accelerator! http://thexaccelerator.com I spent the last six months creating this course to reveal the exact strategies, tactics, and tools that helped me gain 670K followers, reach 3B impressions, and earn over $75K in just one year on 𝕏.

The 𝕏 Accelerator Grow & Monetize Your X Account (Formerly Twitter) The 𝕏 Accelerator is a course designed to help you grow and monetize your X. Master the tweepcred and recommendation algorithm. Discover the ten rules to grow your audience on X. Learn how to consistently craft captivating content. Harness the power of Grok & ChatGPT. Learn OSINT techniques. thexaccelerator.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#3 @RobertKennedyJr tells @jimmy_dore: "They took the money that Cheney gave them [from the Patriot Act], $2.2 billion, and they funneled it through NIH, and it all went through Anthony Fauci. So beginning in 2002, Fauci got a 68% raise from the Pentagon for doing bioweapons development, and he got a raise of billions of dollars a year, and then he started doing all of this gain-of-function. In 2014, three of those bugs escaped in high-profile escapes from different labs in the US. Congress held hearings on it. Everybody was angry, and 300 top scientists sent letters to Obama saying you got to shut down Fauci because he is going to create a pandemic. So, Obama ordered a moratorium, and at that time, Fauci had eighteen different gain-of-function experiments he was doing around the US. He instead moved his stuff offshore to Wuhan, where he could do it out of sight of these 300 scientists and nosy White House officials who were trying to shut him down. And he continued to do it with the same people he was funding here, Ralph Baric and Peter Dazak, and they moved their operation to the Wuhan lab."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pentagon worried about a bioweapons arms race, so they funneled $2.2 billion through the NIH to Anthony Fauci, who received a 68% raise from the Pentagon beginning in 2002 for bioweapons development. Fauci then started gain of function research. In 2014, three bugs escaped from different labs in the United States, leading to publicity and congressional hearings. Three hundred scientists sent letters to Obama, saying to shut down Anthony Fauci because he would create a pandemic. Obama ordered a moratorium, but Fauci moved his experiments offshore to Wuhan to continue with Ralph Baric and Peter Dazsak, out of sight of scientists and White House officials. They continued their operations at the Wuhan Lab.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pentagon was very worried about actually launching a full blown bioweapons arms race because they said nobody you know, this is very sketchy. The Patriot Act, you know, exemptions are very sketchy, and people don't even know about it. And so they didn't wanna do it, so they took the money that Cheney gave them, $2,200,000,000, and they funneled it through NIH. And it all went through Anthony Fauci. So beginning in 2002, Anthony Fauci got a 68% raise from the Pentagon for doing bioweapons development. Wow. And he got a raise of 1,000,000,000 of dollars a year to do it. And then he started building doing that's when they started doing all this gain of function. And then in 2014, 3 of those bugs escaped in high profile escapes from different labs in the United States. Fauci had a bug built all these new labs at BU, at Galveston to do the to do his shenanigans. And so 4 or 3 of the bugs escaped, and the they received publicity, made a smallpox, and a lot of really bad things. And then ungracedlled hearings on it. Everybody was angry. These bugs escaped, and 300 scientists, top scientists sent letters to Obama saying you gotta shut down Anthony Fauci because he's gonna create a pandemic. And so Obama ordered a moratorium, and at that time, Fauci had a 18 different, data function experiments he was doing around the United States. Obama ordered him to shut them all down, but he didn't. He instead moved his stuff offshore to Wuhan, where he could do it out of sight of these 300 scientists and nosy White House officials who are trying to shut them down. And they continued to do it with Ralph Baric, the same people he was funding here, Ralph Baric Wow. And Peter Dazsak, and they moved their operations to the Wollohan Lab.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#4 @RobertKennedyJr tells @jimmy_dore that after Obama shut down their bioweapons research, the CIA, DOD, and Dr. Anthony Fauci moved their coronavirus bioweapons experiments to the Wuhan lab. "Fauci funded the study that taught the Chinese military scientists, everything in China is dual-use, that lab is a military lab, and he taught them cutting-edge technology for building weapons of mass destruction. In other words, the study for how to create the clones and how to create a spike protein that could attach to a human lung and transplant it onto a coronavirus. He also funded through Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina a technique called seamless ligation which is a technique for hiding human tampering on that virus after you've done it. Fauci gave Baric $212 million, and Baric developed a technique for hiding the human tampering; Baric taught that to Shi Zhengli, the Chinese bat lady. USAID gave ten times what Fauci gave. The DOD was there. Why were they in there teaching Chinese scientists how to build weapons of mass destruction? USAID is a CIA front group. Eco-health Alliance is a CIA front group. The CIA modeled this outbreak in 2019 twice, the second time at Event 201. Who was at Event 201? Avril Haines co-hosted it with Bill Gates, and the head of the Chinese CDC, George Gao, was there. The virus was already circulating in Wuhan, nobody knew it, but George Gao had to know it; he was the head of the Chinese CDC and their number one expert on coronaviruses. He comes to New York in October of 2019 and sits downs with Avril Haines, the former director of the CIA, today the Director of National Intelligence, the top spy in the country, and they do a four-part simulation, and the fourth part is George Gao and Avril Haines talking about how do we get social media to censor people if they say this is from a lab leak."

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#5 @RobertKennedyJr tells @jimmy_dore that in 2001, anthrax was mailed to the two senators who tried to block the Patriot Act. The FBI later found that the anthrax came from the CIA lab in Fort Detrick: "By the time they figured it out, they had already passed the Patriot Act, and we were in a trillion-dollar war in Iraq. What did the FBI say? The FBI said it was Ames anthrax, and the only place that it could have come from was the CIA lab in Fort Detrick. It's clear that somebody associated with the Pentagon or the CIA had something to do with that anthrax because nobody had access except those groups."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Following the anthrax attacks in 2002, the Patriot Act was passed after anthrax was sent to the two senators blocking it. The speaker claims the FBI found the anthrax was used by neocons and the CIA to get the U.S. into Iraq, and that George Tenet told George Bush that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. The speaker alleges the anthrax was sent to the two senators blocking the Patriot Act a week after 9/11. They say the Patriot Act passed by acclamation, and contained assaults on the Geneva Convention and the bioweapons charter, and reopened the bioweapons arm race shut down by Nixon. The speaker claims the FBI determined the anthrax was Ames Anthrax, which could only have come from the CIA lab in Fort Detrick. They conclude that someone associated with the Pentagon or the CIA was involved with the anthrax.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After the anthrax attacks in 2002, the, the the Pentagon the Patriot Act was passed. You know, the anthrax was sent to the 2 guys who were blocking the Patriot Act, Patrick Leahy. And and by the way, the anthrax, FBI found after the anthrax was used by the neocons to and the CIA to get us into Iraq. You know, George Tenet, the head of the CIA, said told George Bush it's a slam dunk. He has, you know, these weapons of mass destruction. George w Bush had the worst mistake that he made in the presidency. He was believing the head of the CIA. They wanted to go to war, and we went to war because of that anthrax attack. Because because, obviously, Sodom has nothing to do with 911. But a week after 911, they sent the anthrax. Now the anthrax, they sent it to the 2 guys who were blocking the Patriot Act. So they they took the Patriot Act off the shelf, 350 pages on 911, and said, we gotta pass this. If you're a Patriot, you gotta vote for it. Nobody read it. The 2 guys who were trying to block it get the anthrax. It shuts down Congress. 2 days later, they passed the basically, by acclamation, they passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act had it not only all of these assaults on, you know, section that said, the Geneva Convention, the bioweapons charter are still in effect, but no federal official can be prosecuted for violating them. Oh, it reopened the bioweapons arm race that had been shut down in by Nixon in 1969 when he ordered all bioweapons destroyed, and Fort Detrick closed. Now the FBI investigated where this came from, but it took by the time they figured it out, we had already passed the Patriot Act, and we were in war, an $8,000,000,000,000 war in Iraq. The neocons and the CIA wanted. What did the FBI say? The FBI said that the anthrax was Ames Anthrax, and the only place it could've come from was the CIA lab in Fort Detrick. And so, it's it's clear that that somebody associated with the Pentagon or the CIA had something to do with that anthrax because nobody had had access to it except those groups.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#6 By 2003, the Bush administration was requesting $2 billion annually for biodefense, and President George W. Bush announced an additional $6 billion for Project Bioshield in his State of the Union address. "I ask you tonight to add to our future security with a major research and production effort to guard our people against bioterrorism called Project Bioshield. The budget I send you will propose almost $6 billion to quickly make available effective vaccines and treatments against agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola, and plague. We must assume that our enemies would use these diseases as weapons, and we must act before the dangers are upon us."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Project BioShield is a proposed initiative to enhance future security against bioterrorism. The speaker requests support for a budget proposal of almost $6,000,000,000. This funding aims to rapidly develop and provide effective vaccines and treatments. The focus is on agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola, and plague. The speaker asserts the necessity to act preemptively, based on the assumption that enemies may weaponize these diseases.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I ask you tonight to add to our future security with a major research and production effort to guard our people against bioterrorism called project bio shield. The budget I send you will propose almost $6,000,000,000 to quickly make available effective vaccines and treatments against agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola and plague. We must assume that our enemies would use these diseases as weapons and we must act before the dangers are upon us.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#7 The Los Angeles Times reported that the "non-military biodefense research budget" jumped from $60 million in 2001 to $317 million in 2002. By 2003, the Bush administration was requesting $2 billion, surpassing the combined budgets for breast and lung cancer, stroke, and tuberculosis research. The funds were to build high-security labs at universities and government agencies for work on "vaccines and treatments for biowarfare agents," but some experts raised concerns about the security risks of experimenting with these dangerous pathogens. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2003-feb-12-sci-biodefense12-story.html

Biodefense Lab on the Defensive Calls for more funds to fight bioterrorism are met with cries for greater scrutiny at the United States' lead research facility. latimes.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#8 Archived versions of the NIAID's Biodefense website show Dr. Anthony Fauci detailing how the Patriot Act put him in charge of the nation's biodefense infrastructure: "Homeland security is a multifaceted endeavor, of which biodefense is a critical component. Our nation's ability to detect and counter bioterrorism depends to a large degree on the information generated by biomedical research on dangerous, disease-causing microbes and on the immune system response to these pathogens. Much of this research is supported by the NIH and NIAID. The role of NIAID biodefense research is to develop the tools necessary to protect civilians from potential agents of bioterrorism. Since the fall of 2001, the NIAID has moved quickly to accelerate basic and clinical research related to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases caused by potential agents of bioterrorism. For fiscal year 2003, the President has proposed a $1.75 billion budget in biodefense research funding for NIH, which will enable the NIAID and other NIH institutes to expand ongoing projects and establish new initiatives as part of a comprehensive and sustained biodefense research program." web.archive.org/web/2003010713…

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#9 In Dec. 2002, Dr. Anthony Fauci revealed that the distinction between "biodefense" and "bioweapons" is merely semantic, explaining how his new role required him to learn the "ways of biowarfare" from former Soviet Union "bioweaponers": "I found myself again, never imagining that I would be doing this, needing to learn from people that I never thought I would be learning things from, namely bioweaponers. People who are our own bioweaponers in the US decades ago, international figures, people from other countries, the UK, and also importantly, defectors particularly from the Soviet Union who had vast experience in the ways of biowarfare."

Video Transcript AI Summary
To create a defensive program against bioterrorism, the speaker consulted with unconventional sources. These included former U.S. bioweapons experts from decades ago, international figures from countries like the U.K., and defectors from the Soviet Union. The speaker learned from these experts to inform the development of a multi-billion dollar program.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We needed to put into place a plan, to deal on a public health basis and on a biomedical research basis. The difficulty is this was totally uncharted grounds for us, so I found myself, again, never imagining that I would be doing this, needing to learn from people that I never thought I would be learning things from, namely bio weaponers, people who were our own bio weaponers in the United States decades ago, international figures, people from other countries, the U. K, and also, and importantly, defectors, particularly from the Soviet Union, who had vast experience in the ways of biowarfare. And what I learned very quickly that if we're going to mount a defensive program to guard the homeland against bioterror, we had to understand some fundamental things that may seem obvious, but when you're planning a multibillion dollar program, they're not so obvious.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#10 "With the stroke of Bush and Cheney’s pen, all United States biodefense efforts, classified or unclassified, were placed under the aegis of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Fauci now had a virtual carte blanche to not merely approve but design and run the kind of research projects he sought — and could do so with no oversight structure above him. Biodefense projects that formerly would have fallen under the authority of military or intelligence agencies were now under his direct supervision." https://unherd.com/2022/08/how-dick-cheney-created-anthony-fauci/

How Dick Cheney created Anthony Fauci America's biodefence strategy has finally backfired unherd.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#11 "It’s this that explains one of the most bewildering irregularities surrounding Anthony Fauci: his compensation. As widely reported, Fauci is the highest-paid member of the federal government, out-earning the President, four-star generals, senators, and Super Court Justices. His salary roughly doubled that of his own (nominal) boss until recently, NIH director Francis Collins. Fauci’s giant pay packet can be traced back to 2004, the year after NIAID was made the country’s top biodefence authority agency." https://unherd.com/2022/08/how-dick-cheney-created-anthony-fauci/

How Dick Cheney created Anthony Fauci America's biodefence strategy has finally backfired unherd.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#12 In December 2004, Dr. Fauci received a “permanent pay adjustment” to “appropriately compensate him for the level of responsibility… especially as it relates to his work on biodefense research activities.” From 2004 to 2007, Dr. Fauci's salary increased by 68%, rising from $200,000 to $335,000 a year. https://www.openthebooks.com/assets/1/6/NIH_FOIA_-_55847_Andrzejewski_-_Partial_Response_-_Employment_Contract_(003).pdf

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#13 In 2014, reports surfaced of major lab blunders at US government labs involving anthrax, bird flu, and smallpox: "The United States has spent billions on the Project BioShield Act, a program meant to keep its citizens safe from bioterrorists. Despite these good intentions, that program may have put the nation at greater risk of a homegrown disease escaping from a lab and quickly infecting millions. That's because while the real threat of bioterror is minimal—there have been only a handful of such attacks in modern history, and none since 2001—the risk of bio-error is actually quite high." https://www.newsweek.com/2014/03/21/only-thing-scarier-bio-warfare-antidote-247993.html https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/08/17/reports-of-incidents-at-bioterror-select-agent-labs/14140483/ https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.15570.pdf

The Cure Could Kill You As poorly regulated labs race to find the next antidote, bio-error may be more likely to cause an epidemic than bio-terror newsweek.com
Hundreds of bioterror lab mishaps cloaked in secrecy Recent blunders at federal labs involving anthrax, bird flu are among many nationwide usatoday.com
Safety lapses in US government labs spark debate - Nature Head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pledges ‘comprehensive, sweeping change’ after incidents involving influenza and anthrax. nature.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#14 Over 300 top scientists, including four Nobel Laureates, wrote an open letter urging President Barack Obama to shut down Dr. Anthony Fauci's risky gain-of-function research. The signatories were from leading institutions like Harvard, Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Yale, MIT, UCLA, Oxford, and Princeton: "Accident risk with newly created 'potential pandemic pathogens' raise grave new concerns. Laboratory creation of highly transmissible, novel strains of dangerous viruses, especially but not limited to influenza, poses substantially increased risks. An accidential infection in such a setting could trigger outbreaks that would be difficult or impossible to control." web.archive.org/web/2014083018…

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#15 In October 2014, President Obama announced a pause on Dr. Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function experiments. As @RobertKennedyJr told @jimmy_dore, this moratorium halted 18 gain-of-function experiments, according to NIH documents. "The White House today stepped into an ongoing debate about controversial virus experiments with a startling announcement: It is halting all federal funding for so-called gain-of-function (GOF) studies that alter a pathogen to make it more transmissible or deadly so that experts can work out a U.S. government-wide policy for weighing the risks. Federal officials are also asking the handful of researchers doing ongoing work in this area to agree to a voluntary moratorium." https://www.science.org/content/article/us-halts-funding-new-risky-virus-studies-calls-voluntary-moratorium?_ga=2.106803779.1952447939.1676655380-258147282.1676655380

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#16 Dr. Anthony Fauci's NIAID sent 18 letters to 14 institutions, instructing them to stop their gain-of-function experiments. https://www.science.org/do/10.1126/article.71505/full/_43088final.pdf

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#17 After the pause on gain-of-function research, Dr. Anthony Fauci, USAID (CIA), DOD, and other US agencies collaborated with Dr. Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance and Dr. Ralph Baric to transfer Fauci's coronavirus research to Dr. Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. A well-documented scientific paper trail shows Dr. Fauci funding Dr. Baric's bioweapons research and that knowledge being passed to Dr. Shi Zhengli at the Wuhan lab. "The NIH decided the risk was worth it. In a potentially fateful decision, it funded work similar to Baric’s at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which soon used its own reverse-genetics technology to make numerous coronavirus chimeras. Unnoticed by most, however, was a key difference that significantly shifted the risk calculation. The Chinese work was carried out at biosafety level 2 (BSL-2), a much lower tier than Baric’s BSL-3+." https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/1027290/gain-of-function-risky-bat-virus-engineering-links-america-to-wuhan/ 2005: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1149438/ 2006: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124135/ 2008: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19036930 2009: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19153232 2010: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19906932 2013: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23365422 2014: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24667706 2015: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26552008

Inside the risky bat-virus engineering that links America to Wuhan China emulated US gain-of-function techniques in unsafe conditions with NIH funding. technologyreview.com
Humanized mice develop coronavirus respiratory disease ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Sars Cov Replication and Pathogenesis in Human Airway Airway Epithelial Cultures ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Synthetic recombinant bat SARS-like coronavirus is infectious in cultured cells and in mice - PubMed Defining prospective pathways by which zoonoses evolve and emerge as human pathogens is critical for anticipating and controlling both natural and deliberate pandemics. However, predicting tenable pathways of animal-to-human movement has been hindered by challenges in identifying reservoir species, … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp9 dimerization is essential for efficient viral growth - PubMed The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) devotes a significant portion of its genome to producing nonstructural proteins required for viral replication. SARS-CoV nonstructural protein 9 (nsp9) was identified as an essential protein with RNA/DNA-binding activity, and yet its biolo … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission - PubMed Over the past 30 years, several cross-species transmission events, as well as changes in virus tropism, have mediated significant animal and human diseases. Most notable is severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), a lower respiratory tract disease of humans that was first reported in late 2002 in G … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Release of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nuclear import block enhances host transcription in human lung cells - PubMed The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus accessory protein ORF6 antagonizes interferon signaling by blocking karyopherin-mediated nuclear import processes. Viral nuclear import antagonists, expressed by several highly pathogenic RNA viruses, likely mediate pleiotropic effects on host gene e … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A mouse model for Betacoronavirus subgroup 2c using a bat coronavirus strain HKU5 variant - PubMed Cross-species transmission of zoonotic coronaviruses (CoVs) can result in pandemic disease outbreaks. Middle East respiratory syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV), identified in 2012, has caused 182 cases to date, with ~43% mortality, and no small animal model has been reported. MERS-CoV and Pipistrellus bat cor … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence - PubMed The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)-CoV underscores the threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans. Here we examine the disease potential of a SARS-like virus, SHC014-CoV, which is curre … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#18 That's why Senator @RandPaul accused Dr. Fauci of funding “supervirus” research in the US and making a "huge mistake” by sharing the knowledge with China. Fauci denied the claim, stating: “The NIH has not ever, and does not now, fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript revolves around claims and counterclaims regarding whether the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Dr. Fauci denies that the NIH and NIAID "categorically" funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan and states he has never lied to Congress. He asserts Senator Paul does not know what he is talking about. Others claim the NIH provided grant money to a research group that conducted experiments with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan. They allege the NIH acknowledged funding research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that unexpectedly made a bat coronavirus more contagious. One speaker states that the NIH funded controversial gain-of-function research using coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab, contradicting Dr. Fauci’s claims. Another speaker suggests that evidence points to the virus originating from the lab and that those who funded the lab will be held responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We I I don't know how many times I can say it, madam chair. We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 1: In our health lead, we now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in a lab. Speaker 0: NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute. Speaker 1: The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one. Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan? Speaker 0: Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress, and I do not retract that statement. Speaker 3: A new letter raising questions about experiments in a Wuhan lab. Speaker 0: What was let me finish. Speaker 2: Take an animal virus and you increase the transgility to humans Right. You're saying that's not gain the funding? Speaker 0: That is correct. And and senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 3: For years, the National Institutes of Health are providing grant money to the People Health Alliance Research Group, which conducted experiments with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China. Speaker 0: And if anybody is lying here, senator, it is you. That's where you are getting. Let me finish. We don't know. Wait a minute. Speaker 2: It didn't come from the lab, but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab. You there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab, including yourself. Speaker 4: National Institute of Health admitted this week that it funded controversial gain of function research using coronaviruses at a lab in China at the epicenter of the pandemic, contradicting claims from doctor Anthony Fauci that American tax dollars never paid for that kind of research. Speaker 0: I have not lied before congress. I have never lied, certainly not before congress. Case closed.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#19 But even Dr. Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director, told Congress that he believes Dr. Anthony Fauci used American taxpayer dollars to fund the bioweapons research that created COVID-19: "I think it did — not only from NIH but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD."

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Speaker 1, Dr. Fauci was informed via email on January 27, 2020, that NIAID had a financial connection to the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance. Speaker 1 believes NIH was funding gain of function research. Speaker 1 also claims American tax dollars likely funded gain of function research that created the virus, not only from NIH, but also from the State Department, USAID, and DOD.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci was affirmatively told in told in an email that, NIAID had a monetary relationship with the Wuhan, Institute through, EcoHealth Alliance. He he was told this in January 27th 20 20. Do you think that doctor Fauci intentionally lied under oath to Senator Paul when he vehemently denied NIH's funding of gain of function research? Speaker 1: I think there's no doubt that NIH was funding gain of function research. Speaker 0: Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain of function research that created this virus? Speaker 1: I think it did, not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD. Speaker 0: I'm out of time. Thank you very much.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#20 That's why @RobertKennedyJr told @jimmy_dore that Dr. Anthony Fauci has been the 'American Czar of Bioweapons' since 2002. I’m beyond thrilled at the prospect of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. leading the Department of Health and Human Services, ending regulatory capture, and Making America Healthy Again! Our children are among the sickest in the world, our health agencies have failed us, and it’s time to start a new chapter.

HansMahncke
Posted - September 9, 2024 at 11:13 PM
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 7:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hans Mahncke highlighted a warning from Ron Fouchier, a key figure in gain-of-function research, who cautioned that public awareness of COVID-19's origins in the Wuhan lab could lead to scrutiny of other outbreaks. Jude_62 responded by questioning why Anthony Fauci has not faced prosecution for allegedly lying to Congress or funding illegal gain-of-function experiments, referencing Rand Paul's previous statements on the matter.

@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke

The day after Fauci's secret teleconference, Ron Fouchier, one of the godfathers of gain-of-function experiments, warned/threatened everyone on the call that if the public became aware that Covid came out of the Wuhan lab, they would begin to question other outbreaks. https://t.co/wrqPstgt95

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

Hmmm...The Wuhan Institute of Virology may have leaked the poliovirus before they got around to leaking COVID-19.

@Jude_62 - We the People | Populism is Democracy 🇺🇸

@HansMahncke Has Fauci been prosecuted for lying to Congress or funding illegal gain of function experiments? Nope. @RandPaul https://t.co/3DTkMg8sQa

VigilantFox
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 4:34 AM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 1:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across some compelling insights from Dr. Robert Redfield, the ex-CDC Director, regarding the origins of COVID. He asserts that the virus was not naturally occurring but rather a product of scientific arrogance, challenging the wet market theory that Fauci supported. Redfield claims he was informed by the Chinese CDC director that the outbreak had no ties to the wet market. He expressed frustration over Fauci's dismissal of his concerns, emphasizing that Fauci only focused on one hypothesis. Additionally, I found a documentary that captures Redfield's candid views on Fauci.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ex-CDC Director Throws Fauci Under the Bus “This [COVID] virus was not of natural origin. It was an act of scientific ARROGANCE.” The “wet market theory” that Fauci pushed hard in 2020 was, according to Dr. Redfield, a HOAX. Redfield knows this because, in early 2020, the Chinese CDC director, George Gao, told him, “Bob, we have hundreds of cases, and it [COVID] has nothing to do with the wet market.” After doing his own analysis as a clinical virologist, Redfield told Fauci, “This virus was way too infectious in humans right out of the gate,” leading him to conclude it was made in a lab. But Fauci dismissed Redfield’s concerns, telling him his “premise was wrong,” which frustrated Redfield. “I thought that Tony should embrace scientific investigation. But Tony only considered a single hypothesis: spillover, spillover, spillover, spillover,” Redfield lamented.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This virus likely did not originate naturally; it stems from scientific arrogance. In the early pandemic, there were claims about a wet market being the source, but evidence soon showed many cases unrelated to it. By early January, it was clear the wet market narrative was misleading. I informed the National Security Council and Anthony Fauci that the virus was highly infectious, suggesting it had been engineered in a lab. The Wuhan Institute of Virology is well-known for coronavirus research, making the lab leak theory plausible. Despite discussions, Fauci maintained a focus on the wet market hypothesis, dismissing the need for broader scientific investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My own view is that this virus was not of natural origin. It was an act of scientific arrogance. Speaker 1: He's blamed in the early days for a lot of the problems with the pandemic, but then there's other reports that say that he told Fauci that this was most likely a lab leak, and he was excluded from all these secret teleconferences that were happening. He's also a colleague of Fauci's for 40 years. It's incredible. And then in 2018, they get put in the same orbit again when Redfield gets appointed to be the director of the CDC. Speaker 0: Everyone, you know, without any critical analysis attributed this to the wet market. And nobody went back and looked at people that had nothing to do with the wet market. And a couple days later, George Gao called me back, and he said, Bob, we have hundreds of cases, and it has nothing to do with the wet market. So we knew by the 1st couple days in January that this wet market story, in my view, was a ruse. I called the National Security Council, and I told them that there was a situation in China. And then I called Anthony Fauci. And I told them, as a clinical virologist, this virus is way too infectious in humans right out of the gate. I felt strongly that it had been educated in the laboratory. Speaker 1: And Redfield knew that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the most famous lab in the world for researching coronaviruses. So the idea that this virus came from a lab is very reasonable. Speaker 0: We were talking about it, and Tony argues that my premise is wrong that I believe that came from the lab, and it was clear the aggressive support for the wet market being the source. I thought that Tony should embrace scientific investigation, but Tony only considered a single hypothesis with spillover spillover spillover spillover.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This new documentary on Dr. Fauci is really good. It seems like Dr. Robert Redfield is finally saying what he really thinks about Fauci. Click the link to watch the first 8 minutes for free. https://tydfmovie.com/preview/

Video Transcript AI Summary
From the start, the lines were drawn regarding the virus's origins. I believed it came from a lab, while others disagreed. My position as head of the CDC was undermined, and I was told it was a White House decision. I find that hard to believe; it seems like a cover-up. Why would we share advanced biotechnology with China? I doubt the measures in place will be foolproof; issues will arise. There have been multiple lies throughout this situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From the beginning, the lines were drawn. I said this virus came from the lab. Tony said I was wrong. I was only the head of CDC until I got iced out. I was told it was the White House. I don't buy that. It was a cover. Why would we trade the Chinese the most advanced biotechnology in the world? Ease is fine. It's insane. I don't think this is gonna be food proof. Things are gonna slip through. Ouchie. You. And lied repeatedly.
Preview – Thank You Dr. Fauci Preview – Thank You Dr. Fauci tydfmovie.com
liz_churchill10
Posted - November 10, 2024 at 3:27 PM
Saved - November 10, 2024 at 3:48 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Dr. Fauci MUST BE CHARGED for being a ‘Pandemic PLANNER’. He LIED to everyone about ‘Covid’. HIS OWN EMAILS prove this. LOCK HIM UP. https://t.co/SHQo2rMVeC

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 9, 2024, Anthony Fauci admitted that the 6-foot social distancing guideline was arbitrary. He previously claimed that masks were necessary, despite acknowledging they don't provide perfect protection. Fauci also asserted that COVID vaccines would prevent infection, which later proved inaccurate. Both political parties allowed Fauci to dictate pandemic responses, leading to significant consequences for schools, businesses, and the economy, resulting in the highest COVID death rate globally. Critics of Fauci faced censorship and were labeled conspiracy theorists. Recently, Fauci acknowledged that the lab leak theory is a possibility. The speaker calls for a new political path, urging donations to their campaign to break free from the two-party system and restore democracy and moral authority in the U.S.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On January 9, 2024, doctor Anthony Fauci admitted during congressional testimony that the 6 foot social distancing mandate, quote, sort of just appeared, end quote. Speaker 1: Doctor Anthony Fauci now admitting social distancing wasn't based on science. Fauci telling a house committee this week, the idea standing 6 feet apart, quote, just sort of appeared. The shocking admission comes nearly four years after statements like this. Speaker 2: Every aspect of that ending the COVID outbreak in 30 days has some aspect of it, a physical separation. Whether that's avoiding crowds, whether that's staying 6 feet away from people, whether that's doing teleworking, all of it does that. Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci also forced Americans to wear masks after admitting that they don't work. Speaker 2: Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. Speaker 0: And remember when he said that the COVID vaccine would stop you from getting infected? Speaker 2: The situation is so clear. The data affirm. If you get vaccinated, you are protected even with the Delta variant. Speaker 0: And all voices of dissent were silent. A Republican president and Democratic president and their political parties and their members of congress made the same choice to hand the keys of our nation over to doctor Fauci. Then they stood by and watched as he destroyed our schools, our churches, our businesses, and our economy. Under their watch, we ended up having the highest death rate from COVID in the world. Throughout the pandemic, I was posting scientific evidence and warning that doctor Fauci was wrong about many of these issues. And to silence that criticism, government officials and their allies in the media branded me as a conspiracy theorist and deplatformed me and heavily censored people from the mainstream and social media. Speaker 2: This week, some of the biggest names in the anti vax movement descended on DC for a rally to protest vaccine mandates. Speaker 0: And now doctor Fauci is finally admitting that the Wuhan lab leak is not, after all, a conspiracy theory. Speaker 2: The most likely origin is a jumping of species. I still do think it is at the same time as I'm keeping an open mind that it might be a lab lead. Speaker 0: Of course, I already knew this because I literally wrote the book on this incident. So the next time that the going gets rough, who do you want to have the power? We, the people, or the 2 political parties that got almost everything wrong. It's time to forge a new path together. If you wanna see that happen, please donate to my campaign. Our filing deadline is February 29th. Whether it's $1 or $5 or $100, every dollar you donate will allow America to break free of the shackles of the 2 party system. I wanna give you back your country. I wanna give you back the power of self governance and restore our nation as the world's exemplary democracy. Democracy. I wanna restore our moral authority across the globe. Join me and declare your independence.
toobaffled
Posted - November 19, 2024 at 11:32 PM
Saved - November 20, 2024 at 1:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview with Dana Parish, former CDC Director Robert Redfield made significant claims regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and mRNA vaccines. He asserted that COVID-19 was engineered in a lab, sharing several revelations that challenge the prevailing narrative. Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, also pointed fingers at Anthony Fauci, suggesting his involvement in the pandemic's handling and the resulting deaths.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Former U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield has dropped several whistleblowing bombshells on the Covid pandemic and mRNA “vaccines” in a new interview. Dr. Redfield, a physician and virologist, served as the head of the CDC from 2018 to 2021. During a new interview with singer-turned-health activist Dana Parish, Redfield dropped multiple mindblowing revelations. Redfield declared that the COVID-19 “was engineered” in a lab. https://slaynews.com/news/ex-cdc-director-blows-whistle-covid-mrna-vaccines-blames-fauci-20-million-deaths/

Ex-CDC Director Blows Whistle on Covid & mRNA 'Vaccines,' Blames Fauci for 20 Million Deaths - Slay News Former U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield has dropped several whistleblowing bombshells on the Covid pandemic and mRNA "vaccines" in a new interview. slaynews.com
its_The_Dr
Posted - March 1, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 2:07 PM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Anthony Fauci knew exactly what he was doing, hid the truth! https://t.co/GNB3JW57iR

Video Transcript AI Summary
To ensure public health, vaccinations will be critical. Schools, universities, and colleges may require vaccinations for admission. Major corporations like Amazon and Facebook might mandate vaccinations for employment. History has shown that when life becomes difficult, people often set aside ideological objections and get vaccinated. However, mandatory measures that affect people's ability to work, travel, be educated, and flourish are shameful. Such policies, including mask mandates, school closures, and vaccine mandates, erode the American people's trust in public health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Powered and protected legally, you were gonna have schools, universities, and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. Lady, you're gonna get vaccinated. Yep. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and and and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us, you get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit and they get vaccinated. Speaker 1: That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self determine as we're all given god given rights. Shame on you. You inspired and created fear through mask mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health Speaker 0: in
SenRandPaul
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:07 PM

@SenRandPaul - Senator Rand Paul

Never forget that Fauci lied to all of us. We’re still focused on this in the Senate, glad to see @TulsiGabbard @DrJBhattacharya and @megynkelly aren’t letting this go either!

@MegynKellyShow - The Megyn Kelly Show

"Is it any wonder [Fauci] sought a preemptive pardon?" @TulsiGabbard reveals new information is coming connecting gain-of-function research to COVID origins. @MegynKelly's exclusive interview out tomorrow morning - subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/c/MegynKelly?sub_confirmation=1 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-megyn-kelly-show/id1532976305 https://open.spotify.com/show/0awxEJH88Xur0GHXuteBLw?si=UYTJl1P6TQippmzAu3f69g&nd=1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Chinese State Council Information Office claims COVID originated in the U.S. A special team is investigating COVID's origins, with findings on covid.gov. Work is being done with Jay Bhattacharya and Secretary Kennedy, looking at U.S. funded gain of function research at the Wuhan lab and other biolabs, which has led to health crises. The goal is to find the specific link between gain of function research and COVID-19. If Peter Daszak's research with the Wuhan lab caused the pandemic, then the U.S. funded it, and Anthony Fauci denied it under oath. Gain of function research is ongoing in biolabs worldwide, like in Ukraine. Warning against U.S. funded biolabs in Ukraine led to accusations of being a Russian asset. The intelligence community was reluctant to say COVID came from a lab, possibly due to the politicization of intelligence. This politicization dates back to intelligence used to justify the Iraq regime change war.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the subject of documents that we'd like to see but haven't, COVID and its origins. Yeah. Sure you saw that just before we sat down tonight, the Chinese State Council Information Office, I don't even wanna know what that is, but it sounds bad. They have determined that COVID came from us, that it's more likely than not that COVID originated in The United States and not in China. I'm wondering whether you have any dispute with that based on what you've seen over here. The intelligence community has been responsible for trying to figure out in part Yeah. Speaker 1: How this thing started. So I created a a kind of a special teams group, the director's initiative group that is focused on investigating, a number of the president's top priorities and and the things that the American people really deserve and want to know the truth about. The origins of COVID nineteen is one of them. So they're actively working on that. A lot of the work that's been done is on covid.gov. Have you had a Speaker 0: chance to look? Oh, he Trump changed it. Speaker 1: It's Yeah. Quite great. Speaker 0: Transformation of the website. Yeah. For anybody watching, if you haven't seen it, check it out. It's the annoying website to which YouTube and all social media used to refer people with Fauci talking points, and now it's been completely Completely reversed. Speaker 1: So so it's a lot a lot of what's been found is is already there. But the thing that we are working with, Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on, with as well as secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain of function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab as well as many others many of these other bio labs around the world was actually US funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in, either a pandemic or some other, major health crisis. Speaker 0: Specifically because we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan Lab to create to do gain and function research. That's right. We just have never been able to have somebody say, and it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug. But it have have we gotten there? What's the new thing that you're digging in on? We we are we are working on that with, Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to Speaker 1: being able to share that, hopefully, very soon. Okay. That that specific Link. Correct. Between the gain of function research and what we saw with COVID nineteen. Speaker 0: I mean, that would be extraordinary because just so the audience knows, if that's true, if it was Peter Daszak's research with the Wuhan, so called fat lady, that caused this pandemic, then we did fund it. Then Anthony Fauci helped fund the pandemic. Speaker 1: These things that he denied over and over and over to senator Rand Paul's questioning. Speaker 0: That's right. Under oath. It it it an under oath. Exactly. So it is Speaker 1: is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon for anything during a certain period of time, by president Biden before he left office? Speaker 0: And then strong armed and smeared people like doctor Jay Badajarya, anybody who came out and said, I don't know if that's natural. This actually smacks of lab. And and the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in Speaker 1: the past. It's because this gain of function research is happening in bio labs around the world. I got attacked, and I think you saw this. We've probably talked about on your show before when I warned against US funded bio labs in Ukraine when the Russia Ukraine war kicked off for this very reason. Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID like pandemic? And for that, I was called a Russian asset. You're, you know, trumpeting Putin's talking points, all of this nonsense simply for speaking the truth and stating facts that, by the way, are still on US embassy Ukraine's website today about how The US has funded these bio labs in Ukraine. But in order to my point is in order to prevent another COVID like pandemic or another major health incident that could affect us in in the world, we have to we have to end this gain of function research and provide the evidence that shows exactly why and how it's in our best interest, the American people's best interest to bring about an end to it. Speaker 0: Can I just ask you one other question on that? Why did the intelligence community why were they so reluctant to just say that? You know, under Joe Biden, it was it was split. The FBI eventually said, well, we kinda think it was the lab, and Department of Energy said lab. But then the other agencies were like, no. We think more natural origin. Long past the point when it did not look like natural origin. They tested 80 or 90,000 animals. They never found this version of the virus. So what was going on with the intel community there? Speaker 1: You know, it's a it's a good question, and I don't have a specific answer to it. But I wanna point to the contrast of how, in some cases, they are very unwilling to come to express a view or a certain opinion on something. And in other cases, even if they don't have decisive or conclusive evidence per se, they're very quickly to come to an assumption. And this this gets to the real heart of the challenge here and the problems that we've seen is the politicization of intelligence to meet a certain objective or to influence a certain policy. And that that is what has been the problem. This goes all the way back to why this organization was founded when you look at the so called intelligence that really was used to spur the Iraq regime change war. And look at what that has cost our country Mhmm. In lives, in treasure. Look at what it's cost the world. Look at what what Iraq is today, now essentially a a proxy of Iran when Iraq that that would not have happened had that regime change war, not occurred. Speaker 0: Tariff wars, start up stubborn inflation, no wonder gold has been routinely hitting all time highs. And volatile markets like the one we have now, don't sit on the sidelines with your head in the sand. You can take control and safeguard your savings. This is why so many Americans today are turning to Birch Gold Group. They have helped tens of thousands convert an existing IRA or four zero one into an IRA in physical gold. Is it time for you to hedge against economic instability with gold? To learn how to own physical physical gold in a tax sheltered account, just text m k to the number 989898. will send you a free, no obligation info kit. Again, text MK to the number 989898. With an a plus rating with the Better Business Bureau and countless five star reviews, Birch Gold has helped so many protect their savings with gold. It took us decades to get into the tangled mess they're trying to unpack now in DC. How long is it gonna take to get out of it and at what cost? Text MK to 989898 today. Thanks so much for watching. If you like what you just saw, hit the subscribe button for more clips and full episodes.
Megyn Kelly The Megyn Kelly Show is your home for open, honest and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal and cultural figure... youtube.com
‎The Megyn Kelly Show on Apple Podcasts The Megyn Kelly Show is your home for open, honest and provocative conversations with the most interesting and important political, legal and cultural figures today. No BS. No agenda. And no fear. podcasts.apple.com
Page not found open.spotify.com
aprajitanefes
Posted - August 28, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Saved - September 3, 2025 at 8:22 AM

@aprajitanefes - Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

FULL VIDEO: Military Documents about Gain of Function contradict Fauci testimony under oath #ExposeFauci https://t.co/L2IdCbUNVi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Project Veritas says it has obtained never-before-seen military documents about the origins of COVID-19, gain-of-function research, vaccines, potential treatments, and government concealment. Fauci testified the US government was never involved in gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Major Murphy’s report claims EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 to fund gain-of-function research on bat-borne coronaviruses. DARPA rejected the proposal as too dangerous and potentially violative of the gain-of-function moratorium. Documents allegedly show NIH/NIAID did not reject it and continued research at Wuhan and elsewhere. Fauci has maintained NIH/NIAID were not involved. Murphy’s report cites concerns about the gain-of-function program, concealment of documents, and suppression of potential curatives like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines. Veritas sought comment from DARPA; questions remain about how and why risks were disregarded and who buried the report that could have prevented the pandemic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you've said. Speaker 1: You're still unwilling to admit that they gained in function, they gained in lethality. Speaker 0: According to the definition that is currently operable. Speaker 1: We're not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won't admit that it's dangerous, and for that lack of judgment, I think it's time that you resign. Speaker 2: Project Veritas has obtained never before seen military documents regarding the origins of COVID nineteen, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government's effort to conceal all of this. Doctor Anthony Fauci has testified many times before congress stating that the US government was never involved in gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 1: Will you today finally take some responsibility for funding gain of function research in Wuhan? Speaker 0: Senator, with all due respect, I disagree with so many of the things that you've said. Gain first of all, gain of function is a very nebulous term. Speaker 1: But that thing is is you're still unwilling to admit that they gained in function when they say they became sicker. They gained in lethality. It's a new virus. That's not gain of function? Speaker 0: According to the definition that is currently operable Speaker 1: We're not going to get anywhere close to trying to prevent another lab leak of this dangerous sort of experiment. You won't admit that it's dangerous, and for that lack of judgment, I think it's time that you resign. Speaker 0: You have said that I am unwilling to take any responsibility for the current pandemic. I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. Speaker 2: That assertion is based on the NIH's definition of gain of function. However, the documents we've obtained refute that. Documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret share drive. But what is DARPA? They are an agency under the US Department of Defense which facilitates research and technology with potential military applications. Doctor Stephen Walker was the director of DARPA at the time of the EcoHealth Alliance proposal. Proposal. A source sent us this video of Doctor. Walker talking about research they were exploring related to mRNA technology and its potential application with military personnel in the field. Speaker 3: At DARPA about five six years ago, we stood up an office called the biotechnology office, and the real purpose of that was to understand how biology worked and then build design design, build, and test cycles where you could engineer microorganisms to do things that you wanna do. Speaker 2: Though the main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the Internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the inspector general of the Department of Defense written by the US Marine Corps Major Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA fellow. Major Murphy makes claims in his report to the inspector general that if true could be damning to the official narrative that has been played out to the world over the past two years. Major Murphy's report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal was named project DEFUSE. DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too dangerous and could violate the gain of function moratorium despite EcoHealth's position that it would not. According to the documents the NIAID under the direction of doctor Fauci did not reject the proposal. They went ahead with the research at Wuhan and several sites across The US. Doctor Fauci has repeatedly maintained his position under oath that the NIH and NIAID have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. This appears to be contradictory to Major Murphy's analysis and the rejection from the Biological Technologies Office at DARPA. Major Murphy's report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID nineteen gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines. To be clear, major Murphy is not the source of our reporting. As far as we're aware, he has done nothing that violates his oath of service to our country. We were able to track him down and though he couldn't go into detail about the hidden documents, he did offer this heartfelt statement. Speaker 4: I offer no comments on the investigation or internal marine corps deliberations. I offer a brief comment to those that desire answers and to those that withhold them. To those seeking answers, I offer encouragement. There are good people striving for the truth working together in and out of government, and they succeed. To those that withhold, I pray for you. Find the moral courage to come forward. Don't let a lie be your legacy to posterity. People will forgive. A commitment to truth is in the heart of this nation. Semper Fi. Speaker 2: Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the chief of communications, Jared Adams. Speaker 5: Doesn't sound normal to me. No. Like I said, if if something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked. I'm not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified in a classified space. No. That like I said, that doesn't doesn't sound like I mean, it's it's not good practice to put unmarked materials in, you know, in a in a classified space. But there may be there may be cause to because something is determined to be classified, but it wasn't, you know, originally marked appropriately. I'd be happy, Robert, honestly, to investigate and, you know, talk to the people who would own this document within the agency, ideally the, you know, the director of the biological technologies office or the deputy director of that office and try to ascertain, you know, why it it was the case. Speaker 2: So here's the question. If the Department of Defense, the same people who make our nuclear arsenal, felt this research was too dangerous to proceed with, why in the world did the NIH, NIAID, and EcoHealth Alliance recklessly disregard the risks involved? Did they purposefully change the definition of gain of function in order to bypass the moratorium? Further, who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report that could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of five point four million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.
SenRandPaul
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 4:45 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 2:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Newly released emails reveal that Anthony Fauci instructed colleagues to delete an email from February 2020. This raises questions about his actions regarding gain-of-function experiments and the narrative around COVID's origins. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this on @TheRedactedInc.

@SenRandPaul - Senator Rand Paul

Newly released emails show Anthony Fauci told colleagues to “delete this e-mail after you read it”—all the way back in February 2020. Now the truth is out, and Fauci finally has to answer to Congress. Fauci scrambled to erase his tracks on risky gain-of-function experiments, peddling a convenient narrative about COVID’s origins. While the media bought the animal transmission story, the truth was buried to protect power. Thanks for having me, @ClaytonMorris, on @TheRedactedInc.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Biden administration, attempts to obtain records on funding for Wuhan research were blocked; findings came largely from FOIA challenges. Communications allegedly show Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins instructing: 'read this, this is some more crap coming from me, the senator from Kentucky, I wanna be done with this. When you're done reading it, delete this material.' The speaker says this is illegal and constitutes two crimes: destroying federal records and lying to Congress. The auto pen pardon raises questions about Biden's awareness; the operator says he never met the president, and 'thousands of auto pen pardons' were issued. The speaker has invited Fauci to testify; if not accepted, a subpoena will be issued. They claim Fauci lied to Congress and that gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Fauci's approval. Kennedy, Bhattacharya, Makary cooperative. End deadline for Fauci's response is this week or next.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So do you think the walls are closing in on doctor Fauci? Can you walk us through exactly what you've uncovered regarding these alleged requests to delete official records? Speaker 1: So during the entire Biden administration, I've sought records of what went on, the decision making, why did they fund the research in Wuhan, China, why were they suppressing evidence that it the origin of the virus came from the lab, from a lab accident, and, we got nothing. The Biden administration stiff armed us at every turn. They prevented us from getting virtually any documents. Most of the things we learned during the Biden administration actually came from freedom of information, people outside of government challenging, and the court forcing the Biden administration to reveal things. What we've discovered is in the communications between Anthony Fauci and others, including the head of the NIH, Francis Collins, he would say, read this, this is some more crap coming from me, the senator from Kentucky, I wanna be done with this. When you're done reading it, delete this material. That's, illegal. You're not allowed to delete, emails and and discussions about government business if you're in the executive branch. So, he also has testified that he didn't do that. So it's sort of two crimes. One crime is destroying federal records. The other crime is that he's previously under oath said he wouldn't. Now there is the big question of the auto pen pardon, and so that will have to be challenged, but I think this is the best case. It's a good case. I think it's very neat and tidy, lied to Congress, and then destroyed records. Now he has the auto pen. Does the auto pen, pardon hold? Is it enough? Was president Biden aware of what he was doing? There are thousands of auto pen pardons that were issued. I think there's a very good question whether or not, Biden was aware of that. They've interviewed the person who was running the auto pen. He says he never met the president. So the person doing the auto pen never discussed it directly. He's hearing it from higher ups who were talking to higher ups who allegedly talked to the president. So I think there's a lot to go on here, and this is a good chance for this to get into into the courts, and and and for, frankly, the Department of Justice to fight it out. Whether or not they will do that is an open question, but what I can say right now is I have invited Anthony Fauci in voluntarily. If that is accepted, we're done, and we will bring him in. If it's not accepted, we will subpoena him. Speaker 0: Now what sort of specific are we talking about prison time here? Like what type of specific crimes destroying federal records? Speaker 1: Lying to is the biggest one, probably. It's It can be five years in prison, is a felony. Destroying records, I think adds to that crime and is against the law. So, I think lying to Congress will be the most consequential, but it also shows what kind of person we were dealing with here. We were dealing with a person who was saying, there's no way it came from the lab, and I didn't fund it, and we had no idea they were doing dangerous research. But we have contemporaneous emails. When he was saying publicly, he had no idea, and it couldn't have been gain of function. He was saying privately, we're very worried about that lab because we know they do gain of function research there. And the gain of function research was funded by the United States government with the approval of Anthony Fauci. So virtually everything he said, during the entire pandemic was untrue about the origins, but also untrue about what to do. Do cloth masks work to prevent the transmission? They don't. And yet he was parading around with the Washington Nationals mask telling everybody to wear a cloth mask, and that was bad advice. You know? I mean, for someone to say that's gonna help you and you take their advice and you get infected, that's bad advice. Speaker 0: You mentioned secretary Kennedy in in all of this. How forthcoming has the Trump administration been to I mean, you know, it's kinda like looking back at yourself in a lot of ways. Right? I mean, doctor Fauci was standing there alongside president Trump, operation warp speed, the whole thing. So in many ways, this is shining a light on yourself. How forthcoming has the Trump administration secretary Kennedy and others been on your pursuits here of Fauci? Speaker 1: Secretary Kennedy, NIH director Jay Bhattacharya, FDA director Marty Makarya have all been very very willing to help, very cooperative. And it took a little while to get things going, but I don't think it was their fault. And now we're having complete cooperation and exchange of information, and like I say, it's a lot of information to search through, but our initial investigation has come up with this, I think, very clear cut evidence that he lied to Congress when he said he did not destroy federal records, when in fact, not only did he destroy records, he was advising other people to do the same as well. Speaker 0: Will he testify? I know you said you've put that request out. Has he any response yet from his side? Speaker 1: The we gave him a deadline for the response, which will be, either the end of this week or next week. And then at that point, if there has not been a response, at that point we will issue a subpoena for him.
redpillb0t
Posted - February 23, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Saved - February 23, 2026 at 8:17 AM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

Former CDC Director Robert Redfield confirms - BY OATH - that they were hiding the side effects of the Covid-19 vaccines https://t.co/aGxwLIQrgv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republicans on the subcommittee recount two years of work aimed at linking the COVID-19 origin to a Wuhan lab, arguing that Democrats hindered the pursuit of truth by blocking hearings. They contend mounting evidence supports a lab-origin, and they frame the hearing as a step toward uncovering the truth for Americans who have suffered from COVID-19. Dr. Redfield is cited as having pointed to the lab-leak hypothesis as early as 2020, urging Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, and Tedros to take the lab-leak possibility seriously and to investigate both lab-origin and natural-origin hypotheses. Farrar convened an 11-scientist meeting across five time zones on February 1, inviting Fauci to join, with a note to treat the matter in total confidence. Redfield notes he was excluded from that call despite being included in prior discussions, and asks why he was left out. Emails following the February 1 conference show the four scientists who had attended later told Fauci that they found the genetic sequence inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. Yet, just three days later, these four scientists drafted the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 paper, arguing the opposite. The subcommittee asks for the likelihood that these scientists, after making that earlier statement, could conclude with such certainty that COVID-19 came from nature instead of a lab leak, and suggests Fauci prompted the paper to discredit the lab-leak theory. Speaker 0 characterizes the February 2020 approach as antithetical to science, saying science requires debate and that this process squashed debate. They ask whether Fauci used the proximal-origin paper to hide gain-of-function research that created the virus. Speaker 1 responds that they cannot speak to Fauci’s motivation but asserts the paper is inaccurate and part of a narrative to support a natural-origin story. They state the pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market, noting infections as early as September, and allege a narrative was decided to claim a wet market origin and to negate discussion about a laboratory origin. With twenty seconds left, Speaker 0 raises a point that Fauci was told in January 2020 about NIH’s monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance and asks whether Fauci intentionally lied under oath when denying NIH funding of gain-of-function research. Speaker 1 asserts there is no doubt NIH funded gain-of-function research and adds that American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research from NIH, the State Department, USAID, and DOD. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 noting time and recognizing Ms. Dink.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, chairman. For two years, myself and the other republicans on this subcommittee connected the dots. We exposed the evidence supporting our strong belief that COVID was developed and leaked from the Wuhan lab. And during those same two years, the same Democrats that sit on this committee, they only hindered, they obstructed, they refused to hold hearings and get to the truth. Now we see mounting evidence supporting the COVID nineteen originated from the lab in Wuhan, China run by the communist Chinese, party, and this hearing is about getting to the truth. I thank the chairman for making this the very first hearing because the American people who have seen just as many fellow Americans die from COVID, as nearly as many die from COVID that died in every war since the American Revolution combined deserve to know the truth. Doctor Redfield, you pointed to the lab leak theory even before we did. In 2020, you expressed concerns to doctor Fauci, to Jeremy Farrar of UK's Wellcome Trust, and to doctor Tedros of World Health Organization that, quote, we had to take the lab leak hypothesis with extreme seriousness. And you urged doctor Fauci to investigate both the lab and the natural hypotheses. Shortly thereafter, on February 1, Farrer convened a meeting of a group of 11 top scientists across five time zones, and asked Doctor. Fauci to join, and he wrote, quote, my preference is to keep this group really tight. Obviously, ask everyone to treat in total confidence, unquote. Doctor Redfield, you were excluded from this call, but up until then, you had been on every single, you were included in every other conversation. What changed? Why do you think that you were excluded from these conversations? Speaker 1: Thank you very much. I think just to emphasize in in early to mid January, I did have multiple calls with Fauci, Farrar, and and Tedros about how important I thought it was that science get engaged in in aggressive aggressively pursuing both hypotheses. I also expressed as a clinical virologist that I felt it was not scientifically plausible that this virus went from a bat to humans and became one of the most infectious viruses that we have for humans. All viruses are not the same. So when you look at coronaviruses with for SARS and MERS, for example, when they entered the human species, which they did via an intermediate, they never learned how to go human to human. Even to this day, they don't know how to go human to human. So you can't equate Ebola with a coronavirus. Speaker 0: Now why do you why do you think you were excluded from those calls? Speaker 1: I I because it was it was told to me that, they wanted a single narrative and that I obviously had a different point of view. Speaker 0: Okay. In emails following the conference call for the 11 scientists told Fauci that they all found the genetic sequence inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory, basically what you're saying. However, just three days later, these four scientists had drafted a paper arguing the exact opposite, and that's now the infamous proximal origin of SARS CoV-two. Our investigations show this paper was prompted by doctor Fauci among others with a goal to disprove the lab leak theory. What is the likelihood that these scientists came across additional information just three days after making these statements to conclude with such certainty that COVID nineteen came from nature instead of the lab leak that they thought it was three days earlier? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think it's unfortunate. Again, I've said this before that this whole approach that was taken on January on February 1 and subsequently in the month of February. If you really wanna be truthful, it's antithetical to science. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Science has debate, and they squashed any debate. Speaker 0: Thank you. Given what we know now and looking at all the conversations in February 2020 and before the release of the paper, do you think that, doctor Fauci used this paper to hide the gain of function research created the gain of function research created this virus? Speaker 1: I can't talk about Fauci's motivation. Speaker 0: Do you think that the paper does hide the truth? Speaker 1: I think it's an inaccurate paper that basically was part of a narrative that they were creating. Remember, this pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market. We now know there was infections all the way back in September. This was a narrative that was decided that they were going to say this came from the wet market and they were going to do everything they could to support it to negate any discussion about the possibility that this came from a laboratory. Speaker 0: I've twenty seconds left. Doctor. Fauci was affirmatively told an email that NIAID had a monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance. He he was told this in 01/27/2020. Do you think that doctor. Fauci intentionally lied under oath to senator Paul when he vehemently denied NIH's funding of gain of function research? Speaker 1: I think there's no doubt that NIH was funding gain of function research. Speaker 0: Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain of function research that created this virus? Speaker 1: I think it did, not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD. Speaker 0: I'm out of time. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Now recognize Ms. Speaker 0: Dink
ted_macie
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rising concerns about active-duty safety since 2021, with large increases in "accidents" (399%) and "assaults" (828%). Serious mental-health and neurological risks are reported (dementia, suicidal thoughts, psychosis, brain clots, depression, etc.). DoD acknowledged the issue; the thread shows calls for accountability and fixes, with participants sharing responses and a whistleblower article.

@ted_macie - Ted

⚠️Active-duty population (all occurrences). Rising in 2021. "Accidents" 399%⬆️ "Assault" 828%⬆️ Direct from the DoD. Acknowledged by the prior USD. @DoD_USD_PR @SeanParnellATSD @SecDef, this is why we are relentless. It's been well over 3 years and we are only gaining steam. Keeping us at arms length is not only hurting your credibility, it is hurting the servicemembers and veteran brothers and sisters I know you care about. We're here, ready to fix this s**t. 🇺🇸 "Dementia – 140× more likely Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely Psychosis – 440× more likely Brain clots – 3,000× more likely Schizophrenia – 315× more likely Depression – 530× more likely Violent behavior – 80× more likely Cognitive decline – 115× more likely Delusions – 50× more likely"

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨 BREAKING: Study Identifies 86 Serious Neuropsychiatric Safety Signals Linked to COVID-19 Vaccination ⚠️CDC/FDA safety thresholds breached (PRR ≥ 2 compared to flu shot) for: 📈 Dementia – 140× more likely 📈 Suicidal thoughts – 150× more likely 📈 Homicidal ideation – 25× more likely 📈 Psychosis – 440× more likely 📈 Brain clots – 3,000× more likely 📈 Schizophrenia – 315× more likely 📈 Depression – 530× more likely 📈 Violent behavior – 80× more likely 📈 Cognitive decline – 115× more likely 📈 Delusions – 50× more likely and many more.. This catastrophic neurological and psychiatric damage is likely due to toxic Spike protein production in the brain’s of COVID-19 mRNA injected individuals. The study concludes that, "an immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination is warranted." @jathorpmfm @P_McCulloughMD @AmericanMD @drdrew @CPriceRogers @KirstinCosgrove @McCulloughFund

@pamntx1 - pam

@ted_macie @DoD_USD_PR @SeanParnellATSD @SecDef @LTCTheresaLong @DavisYounts @X_L_Systems @kristinawong @DS_SethRit @JohnDelarm19344 @r_lauderbaugh @DougAMacgregor @RepClayHiggins https://t.co/rToIa16JvJ

@Newsforce - NewsForce

Former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield claims a newly declassified military report reveals that Fauci created a "false narrative" to "protect gain-of-function research." https://t.co/J9DEWOrckN

@r_lauderbaugh - TSgt (Retired) SCOTT R. LAUDERBAUGH

@pamntx1 @ted_macie @DoD_USD_PR @SeanParnellATSD @SecDef @LTCTheresaLong @DavisYounts @X_L_Systems @kristinawong @DS_SethRit @JohnDelarm19344 @DougAMacgregor @RepClayHiggins @El_Jerry1997 @CMarkCoester @RestoringFF @annvandersteel @4got10soldiers @1776medical @corinnecliford @MCBashaw @RobGreen1010

@1776medical - 1776medical

@r_lauderbaugh @pamntx1 @ted_macie @DoD_USD_PR @SeanParnellATSD @SecDef @LTCTheresaLong @DavisYounts @X_L_Systems @kristinawong @DS_SethRit @JohnDelarm19344 @DougAMacgregor @RepClayHiggins @El_Jerry1997 @CMarkCoester @RestoringFF @annvandersteel @4got10soldiers @corinnecliford @MCBashaw @RobGreen1010 Whistleblower Nails Fauci, Rothschilds, Highlands Group, DARPA, DoD, Pirbright, SERCO, QinetiQ, Goldman Sachs, US Navy, US Air Force, US Army, CIA in Worldwide Bioterror https://aim4truth.org/2020/05/11/whistleblower-nails-fauci-rothschild-highlands-darpa/

@1776medical - 1776medical

@r_lauderbaugh @pamntx1 @ted_macie @LTCTheresaLong @DavisYounts @X_L_Systems @DS_SethRit @JohnDelarm19344 @DougAMacgregor @RepClayHiggins @El_Jerry1997 @CMarkCoester @RestoringFF @annvandersteel @4got10soldiers @corinnecliford @MCBashaw @RobGreen1010 @doubleDutchquak @LovesKetty15762 @DSauce @CENTCOM @DOWResponse @RapidResponse47 @USNavy @USCG @BGatesIsaPyscho @Patterdude @BasedSamParker @BasedMikeLee @usairforce @KirkPendergras @naomirwolf

View Full Interactive Feed