CDC & Merck 40 year old secret revealed
AIDS Infection Rate during CDC Heptavax trial
Vaccine: 42% vs Placebo: 9% https://t.co/0LLhA3dII3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows that 42% of trial participants were infected with HIV by the end of the trial. The speaker also mentions the use of chimpanzee blood in the vaccine's production and the subsequent spread of HIV through contaminated blood-based injectables. They propose setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to investigate the facts surrounding this issue. The speaker asks for support and donations to fund the foundation's research.
Speaker 0: Doctor Wilson asserts that this CDC report settles the matter of Merck's blood derived Heptavax being among the many injectables that contained infectious HIV in the 1980s. I agree. Here is the CDC's own data behind their report. Now, everyone knows at the start of the CDC trial, 0% of participants had HIV, and at the end, 42%. So here's Merck's explanation.
Speaker 1: He was dealing with perception more than reality, and the perception was that that HIV was was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to.
Speaker 0: In 1983, when doctors refused heptavax over AIDS fears, officials confirmed 2 trial participants had contracted this yet unidentified disease, and both had received vaccine, not placebo. But they said, 2 cases out of 1,000 didn't justify hesitating to take the vaccine. But months later, A test for the virus was available, revealing almost half the trial participants were infected. But the rate among SIBO recipients became a closely guarded secret. Identifying it took months of digging through physical archives, asking Chachapiti to dissect tens of thousands of pages of scientific papers and following breadcrumbs to calculate it from clues.
For the first time, we know the HIV infection rate among the CDC trial participants who received placebo was 9%. Instead of revealing the placebo rate, the CDC compared trial participants against those excluded due to their prior STDs. But even among that group labeled higher risk, the rate was 23% when the trial ended. The CDC compared the 1984 numbers after the higher risk group had caught up. They falsely claimed to compare those excluded against vaccine recipients.
They actually compare it against all trial participants, including placebo. Since the placebo rate was 9%, the rate among vaccine recipients must be higher? Before diving into where Merck sold heptavax, after seeing these numbers, a quick recap of how it was made. In the 19 sixties, scientists harvested antigens by feeding infected feces to disabled children who they labeled, quote, human informed but not in social potential. When RFK's dad made it illegal, scientists confirmed chimpanzee and human blood were compatible by letting Blood cross circulate through IV tubes.
Humans survived being filled with raw, unprocessed chimp blood. Around 100,000 primates were imported each year to test these viruses. Here's a list of some other viruses they were found to carry. At the time, nobody knew 20% of chimps carried a virus that was harmless to them but caused AIDS in humans. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and NIAID plus pharma infected chimps with human hepatitis to a mass plasma pools with antigens used in numerous experimental vaccines.
Some used only heat to kill whatever unknown viruses lurked. In 1978, the patent was issued for heptavax made from the blood of chimpanzees. When Merck decided to test on New York's gay community, 13,000 blood samples were collected. Upon retesting, Not one had HIV. After Merck's experiments, New York had more HIV cases than all other cities combined in the US or Europe.
When an HIV test became available, health officials realized many blood based injectables from various pharma companies were contaminated. US health officials hid this from the public and Congress, letting companies dump contaminated inventory in poor countries while introducing safe versions in affluent markets. This led to a landmark settlement. Doctor Offitze claimed that Merck was the 1 pharma company that, quote, abandoned this inventory is demonstrably false. The same year Merck's competitors sold their HIV contaminated products overseas, The Swazi in Congo in South Africa began their heptivax campaign using lot 751, the same lot trialed on the gay community almost a decade prior.
This survey found no infection among the Swazi pre vaccination post 40% of the general population was infected. Now such a high infection rate might be plausible among young urban gays, But how does this happen among rural, conservative, Christian families in sparsely populated farming villages with a capital of 1,000 inhabitants? Why were babies infected but not their mothers? Now true, most Swazi new mothers were infected, but pregnant women were also vaccinated. Why were their husbands uninfected?
These regions where women, but not adult men, Got heptavax? Were the only regions where AIDS primarily infected women. Right next to the Swazi is Venda, which shares the same demographic. Yet, while the Swazi had the highest rate, next door Venda had been spared with the lowest rate for nearly 10 years. Then in the 19 nineties, Venda became the last state to get what was still left of Merck's 20 year old heptavax inventory, after which vendor's rates caught up.
Here is the HIV infection rate in Congo, Central Africa, the epicenter since the 19 fifties. Now here it is to the north and here to the south where Merck continued selling heptavax a decade after seeing the CDC trial results. South Africa's 1st HIV positive case was a gay man infected in the US. For 5 years, it exclusively affected South Africa's gay community, but then it exploded among black heterosexuals at a rate not seen since the CDC trials while curiously sparing whites under apartheid. 1990 scientists eviscerated institutions for ignoring the evidence that the majority of the tens of millions of new infections could only be explained by injection, not sex.
I'm setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to get the facts. Swiss charitable foundations are the most trusted as they are tightly regulated and dissolved if they mismanage funds, lack transparency, or deviate from the founding charter. Fact Mission's charter will require a diverse board of advisers and strict Swiss style neutrality to counterbalance my personal bias. Every FACT mission must strictly hire independent, conflict free researchers to follow the protocol negotiated between all interested parties, including pharma companies that accept the invitation to participate. To prevent internal conflicts as well as external, the charter will prohibit taking sides stating opinions, hypotheses, or conclusions.
It must exclusively fund neutral research to test external hypotheses and stop at publishing raw data. Uniquely, the Charter will obligate protecting sources. 100 must have known this but never came forward. When conservative Swiss regulators confirm it's appropriate, the foundation will fund asylum and relocation costs for those facing credible threats. Again, the charter requires neutrality, prohibiting commenting it only covers costs to protect the source.
For this mission, I propose beginning with digitizing medical records from early AIDS cases, test any remaining blood samples, collect eyewitness testimony, and identify differences in the medical interventions given to blacks and whites under apartheid. The only financial benefit I might indirectly receive relates to my COVID vaccine injury a few hours after I was Forced to get the jab despite having just recovered from severe COVID, I had a very severe inflammatory response. My health insurance refused to cover, claiming vaccine injuries must be reimbursed by government programs. However, those also refused because health agencies cannot identify a causal link. Perhaps researching heptavax will demonstrate they don't always reliably report vaccine harms, thus clearing our biggest hurdle.
Jurors might accept doctor Offit's expert opinion that COVID vaccines are less safe than Merck's heptavax, which he concluded was
Speaker 1: the safest vaccine we've ever used.
Speaker 0: I respectfully ask for your support by sending an email to this address indicating how much you would be able to donate to the First Fact Mission. If there are enough pledges, I will, at my expense, register the foundation. Then I will send pledgers an email with instructions to donate and verify the foundation's charter legal status, and that funds will be managed by independent auditors required to disclose all transparently and vacs, exclusively fund the fact finding mission. Interested partners? Please reach out.
Thank you.
