reSee.it - Related Post Feed

forrestmaready
Posted - April 28, 2020 at 10:39 PM
Saved - November 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vaccines have sparked debates, but let's explore some lesser-known facts. Polio was caused by various viruses due to pesticides. The disease declined when DDT use stopped. The first polio vaccine failed, while the second caused polio itself. Vaccines only target specific viruses, leaving other paralyzing viruses unaddressed. The autism-vaccine link remains controversial, with anecdotal evidence suggesting a connection. Smallpox vaccine's side effects were severe, and its composition remains unknown. Vaccines have been associated with eczema, allergies, and autoimmune disorders. Safety testing and monitoring of vaccines are inadequate. Vaccines' impact on pregnant women lacks proper study. Vaccine manufacturers are protected from lawsuits. SIDS cases after vaccination are often labeled unexplained. Visible side effects include cranial nerve damage. These facts raise questions and warrant further exploration.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

1. A lot of people are taking a second look at vaccines these days. As someone who’s written several books about them, I thought you might enjoy my personal opinion/list of the most interesting unknown facts about vaccines. It’s a crazy list! (Thread)

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

2. Polio. The paralysis of polio was caused by many different viruses—not just one. It started happening in the 1890s when they stared coating everything in a new pesticide. It caused leaky guts & allowed these viruses to reach the spinal cord.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

3. Polio ended in the 1950s when they stopped using DDT on children. Like the 1890s pesticide, DDT also caused leaky gut and allowed many different dangerous viruses into the spinal cord, paralyzing many children.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

4. There were basically two polio vaccines. The first one was injected and didn’t work. The second was taken orally and worked okay. But it had a side effect—polio! This vaccine is currently the largest source of polio/paralysis in the world.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

5. Both vaccines targeted the poliovirus. No vaccines were created for the other paralyzing viruses, which is why countries with out-of-control pesticide use (like India) still struggle with childhood paralysis.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

6. Vaccines are the leading cause of autism. Scientists and doctors will swear they are not, but it's obvious to anyone who’s not afraid to look, it's vaccines. How do we know this? I’ll mention two things.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

7. There are thousands and thousands of parents whose children developed autistic symptoms directly after their vaccines—within hours. Sometimes before they got home from the doctor’s offices. This has been documented, often with video proof, over and over.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

8. Autism began appearing in the 1930s in the U.S., directly after aluminum was added to the single pediatric vaccine children received at that time. Another country made this change: Austria. Autism began to appear there as well.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

9. You’ll hear the MSM say the autism/vaccine link has been studied & debunked over & over, but it hasn’t—It’s never been studied. They looked at one vaccine & one ingredient: MMR/mercury. They’ve never looked at aluminum & they never studied all the childhood vaccines together.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

10. You’ll hear that Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s autism/vaccines paper was retracted. That paper looked at the connection between gut illness & children with autism. It specifically said it found no association between vaccines & autism. Why was it retracted then?

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

11. Because parents started getting suspicious, Wakefield and the other dozen authors of the paper became targets of the medical establishment. The result was the longest, most expensive medical court proceeding in the history of the U.K. It was a sham. He was the scapegoat.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

12. The Wakefield paper wasn’t retracted due to fraudulent data, despite what people say. The data wasn’t generated or interpreted by Wakefield anyway. He lost his medical license on a technicality—obtaining control samples of blood from healthy children in an unapproved way.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

13. Smallpox. Many people credit the smallpox vaccine with eradicating smallpox. This is the only human disease which vaccines even receive that credit, by the way. Polio, measles, and every other illness is still out there.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

14. Smallpox was a horrible vaccine. Only a small percentage of the world ever received it and it was stopped being given because the side effects were so horrible and frequent—not because the disease was declared eradicated. You can look up pictures of the side effects.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

15. Scientists don’t currently even know what’s in the smallpox vaccine. It’s been grown in so many different animal species that they can’t even identify what exactly it is anymore. It has been this way for a long time. No other vaccine works like this.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

16. You will hear that smallpox only exists in two laboratories in the U.S. and Russia (as a safeguard against future biological attack—makes sense), but the reality is its virologic descendants probably exist throughout the world—we just don’t even know it.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

17. Vaccines have brought with them many other problems. Eczema. Food allergies. Autoimmune disorders. Other neurological problems—all of these illnesses which didn’t appear to exist before the advent of widespread childhood vaccinations.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

18. Vaccines are not treated as drugs by the government. As a result, they are not safety tested in the same way. A typical drug might be studied for months or years. Vaccines may be monitored for side-effects for as little as 48 hours.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

19. Vaccines aren’t tested against truly inert placebos. They’re tested again OTHER VACCINES! That’s how they compare how safe a vaccine is—by determining if it’s as safe as another vaccine! Crazy but true.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

20. The entire childhood vaccine schedule has never been safety tested. Each vaccine is tested in the ridiculously lax method I just described, but never together the way other drug interactions might be studied.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

21. Flu and TDaP shots which are recommended to pregnant women have never been safety tested on pregnant women. Why? It’s too DANGEROUS. So rather than safety test them, they just administer them and hope for the best. You are the guinea pig.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

22. Vaccine manufacturers made a deal with the government in 1986 & can’t be sued. There is no other business in the world that has this deal. You have to sue the gov’t if something happens, & guess who pays for damages? Not pharma! You do! Through a per-vaccine fee.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

23. SIDS, or Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, are babies who die from their vaccines. Of course no one wants to say that, so they call it unexplained. It doesn’t matter if perfectly health twin babies died the night after their shots, doctors will say “We don’t know what happened.”

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

24. Vaccines routinely cause cranial nerve damage that is visible as asymmetry on your face. Crooked smiles and misaligned eyes are the most easily-recognized symptoms.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

25. Other commonly visible vaccine problems: a droopy mouth & torticollis, when a baby can’t hold their head straight. There are many others I cover in my book, Crooked:Man-made Disease Explained. It’s a fascinating and horrible phenomenon—once you see it, you can’t unsee it.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

26. Before I list some other common unknown facts about vaccines, I’ll list some books real quick. “Unvaccinated” is a short, little book that describes why growing numbers of parents are choosing natural immunity for their children: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1722908696/

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

27. The true story about polio is fascinating if you’ve never heard it. I have a book called “The Moth in the Iron Lung” that describes it like a detective novel—it’s a fairly popular book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1717583679/ Super easy to read.

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

28. Here’s the book about Crooked faces and many other neurological and autoimmune issues: Lyme, Chronic Fatigue, Lupus, POTS, etc.: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1983816620/

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

29. Here is a longer explanation of the Polio story within a Tweet thread. It doesn't do "The Moth" justice, but if you're interested, it is fascinating:

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

1. The polio story as you learned it is wrong. It’s one of the most often misunderstood sequence of events in the last two hundred years. I wanted to explain a few things about the disease to help people understand what actually happened.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

30. Here is a longer explanation of the Autism Vaccine story within a Tweet thread. The book, "The Autism Vaccine" is much better, but you're curious, it may be worth a quick read:

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

1) One of the most jaw-dropping discoveries I made while researching “The Autism Vaccine” took place in Austria. I was initially intrigued by the autism story when I realized that the first time aluminum had been used in a U.S. pediatric vaccine was 1932.

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

31. Much of my vaccine-related research is contained within a nearly 3-hour video that will blow your mind. I don't want to link the YouTube video directly as it may be deleted at anytime, but it's currently at the bottom of this page: http://areyoucrooked.com/

Are You Crooked? areyoucrooked.com

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

32. Okay, more interesting facts about vaccines. Many people believe that AIDS originated from an experimental polio vaccine administered in the Congo. This may seem crazy, but vaccines are routinely cultured in animal tissue. Problems happen when animal viruses get into humans. https://t.co/Bu1gFlNcYZ

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

33. There are 2 HIV strains. Not one, but two. They both got into humans around the same time. How did this seemingly impossible coincidence take place? This map showing where the experimental polio vaccine was administered + initial reports of AIDS might explain it. https://t.co/gFg1RIrvI6

@forrestmaready - Forrest Maready

34. If you think there's no chance this could've happened, it's happened before. Bernice Eddy discovered the polio vaccine in America was tainted with SV40, a virus that was causing cancer. SV = Simian Virus. 40 = They had already discovered 39 other ones. https://t.co/4FNwx0mmam

Stuckelberger
Posted - August 31, 2023 at 10:45 AM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 12:53 PM

@Stuckelberger - Dr Astrid Stuckelberger

HIV-AIDS crime disclosed: Medical doctor witness of genocide through inoculating HIV through vaccines in Africa. Dr Fauci affirms the HIV vaccine is the cause of the illness. It is not the first time with vaccines = Normalized Algorithms to provoke AIDS as now… #Fauci #HIV https://t.co/u9ogrxe9jb

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are allegations that AIDS was intentionally spread in African countries through vaccines. Research facilities were set up to inject people with a solution to prevent AIDS, but instead, they were injecting people with AIDS. These facilities were financed by foreign governments. Additionally, there have been cases where HIV vaccines actually increased the likelihood of infection, showing that a vaccine that seemed safe initially could have negative effects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned actively spreading AIDS? There was a unit in most from Saima that, one of the things was that we went into African countries. And how was that done exactly? Through inoculation. Through vaccines? Yeah. Through vaccines. Pertaining to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people. It was the it was the quick, non militaristic, approach to eliminate black people? He had the one in Tukozi. He had the one in Alex. Yes. If I'm not mistaken, that was on the east on the west strand. So and they these were research facilities for them to to inject people with a solution To see that they prevented AIDS in it. In the meantime, they were injecting people with AIDS. Financed by whom? Financed by foreign governments. One of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely To get infected. This would not be the first time if it happened that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety Actually made people worse.
factbid
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 9:11 PM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 11:26 AM

@factbid - factbid.org

Unearthed FDA Document Rewrites the Narrative on AIDS, Gays, Africans, and Vaccines?! $1,000 reward to fact-check and debunk. Inventors of Merck's vax tested on gay men WERE injecting humans with chimp blood, and there was no AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa when the jabs began

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a document they found that challenges the narrative surrounding vaccines, AIDS, and the origins of the disease. They question the connection between vaccines made from chimpanzee blood and the spread of AIDS in Africa and China. They suggest that the vaccine trials conducted by Merck may have introduced the virus to these regions. The speaker calls for the release of trial data to determine the truth. They also express concerns about the WHO pandemic treaty and the potential loss of individual freedoms. They offer a monetary reward to anyone who can provide evidence supporting their claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I couldn't sleep because yesterday, I stumbled upon this seemingly unreferenced orphan FDA document that utterly annihilates everything we've been told about vaccines, AIDS, the gay community, Africa and Asia's opium triangle, overshadowing any scandal RFK ever mentioned. Its implications are so profound that to incentivize fact checkers to verify I haven't lost my mind, I'll give $1,000 to whoever flags my oversight. Check my track record. I'm a man of my word and always admit my errors and pay up. If you confirm I'm not making this up, Please join me in pledging to support a whistleblower because this document suggests that if the pending WHO pandemic treaty we're about to sign had existed in the 19 eighties, it could have destroyed our society. So begin by verifying the list of significant yet inexplicable outbreaks of AIDS, the disease caused by the most infamous chimpanzee virus. This chat GPT list is uncontroversial. But now search the NIH website for trials of vaccines the maker described as being made from chimpanzee blood or tissue like this one. Aside from the Congo vaccine whose maker originally said, Speaker 1: it was the virus was cultivated on kidney cells, the chimpanzee kidney cells. Speaker 0: Every other trial relates to Merck's original hepatitis b vaccine, which was made from blood and which trials always began by first permanently archiving blood samples from a broad population in that area, which samples were later re examined when a test for the AIDS virus was developed. America's gay meccas were AIDS free when the trials began, yet 70% of participants became infected. Scientists tell us AIDS was spreading sexually across Africa for decades. So how is it possible that according to that FDA bombshell, after 22 years, AIDS apparently had barely spread outside of its origin in Kinshasa, Congo. Did Africans really have more sex in the months following vaccination than in the 22 years that preceded it? If AIDS had been spreading sexually across Africa for decades, according to FCPT's map. Speaker 2: There's only a 1 in 38,000 possibility that it could have evaded detection in these pre vaccination samples had a mere 1% carried the virus. Speaker 0: Doesn't this make it highly probable that the day the white saviors arrived in Sub Saharan Africa in BRCA in 1981 to begin vaccine trials, the region was largely AIDS free outside of Kinshasa where the virus was first found, Oh, yeah. 1 year after allegedly being inoculated with minced up chimpanzee kidneys. Yet, just a few years after Merck's vaccinations began, 18% were infected with the AIDS virus, many children whose mothers were uninfected. When the governments began testing all pregnant women, at first, they were negative until those vaccinated babies reached childbearing age. When it was discovered, up to 1 third carried the AIDS virus. But the strange coincidences don't stop there since a similar scenario unfolded in China where Merck trialed that same vaccine here in 1982. A few years later, children in that region also began mysteriously dying of AIDS and nearby villages saw 10% of their population infected. Now China's use of Merck's vaccine was short lived, quickly shifting to a domestic version, leaving only Sub Saharan Africa to continue administering the version made from blood well into the 19 nineties when half the population was already dead because of course, the cause was anything but the vaccine. China's outbreak was blamed on drug users in the opium triangle on the angle on the opposite side of that enormous country hypothesized to have donated contaminated blood. However, there's no explanation why children who never had blood transfusions, but did get the Merck vaccine, contracted AIDS. In Sub Saharan Africa, the blame was put on negligent nurses who, for some reason, were reusing single use disposable needles during vaccination. The assumption was the AIDS virus was on the dirty needle's exterior with zero consideration for the possibility the virus lurked on the inside. In the U. S, the blame was squarely placed on gay men who are all just a bunch of sluts. Verify by comparing AIDS cases in global gay meccas, which saw infection rates rarely get above single digits in the gay community to these 3 gay cities where infection rates reached 70%. Am I correct? The only thing different about those 3 cities is that they trialed this vaccine. Which vaccine is also the only thing those 3 cities have in common with the outbreaks in Sub Saharan Africa and eastern China, which vaccine happens to be the only one the maker ever admitted did contained the AIDS virus and the only vaccine heterosexual Americans rejected for fear it caused AIDS. Speaker 3: So far, 75% of cases are homosexuals, but 5% are nondrug using heterosexuals with no other risk factors. What about the new hepatitis b vaccine? It's made from the blood of gay men. Its safety is now being questioned. Speaker 1: My understanding is that it's, Coming from gay men who have been victims of hepatitis B, which is the same community where the AIDS is most rampant now. Since we don't know just what the infectious particle Is, I know there is some hesitancy now in, the various departments, particularly on infectious disease here at the hospital, so who should be receiving the vaccine. Speaker 0: And the only vaccine whose inventor said, right after a test for the AIDS virus was developed Speaker 1: I didn't know we recorded the case in March of the 20 Novavax. Speaker 0: And the only vaccine about which the discoverer of the AIDS virus said Speaker 4: If you told me you're giving me a vaccine from human blood at that time obtained from high risk patients, I'd say, maybe I can do it on my hepatitis B vaccine from Speaker 5: my good old friend, Maurice. Speaker 0: And so ironically, the only vaccine whose biggest defender said Speaker 5: And thus, we had the so called plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine, a vaccine that was made from no doubt the most dangerous starting material that we ever used That I would argue created the safest vaccine we've ever used. Speaker 0: I was emotional last night because I've always promised to take my daughter to Africa to experience what I did as a young man and world traveler, where the happiest children I've ever met rushed over to greet me when I was all alone wandering around their town. Innocent youngsters anxious to let me take their picture, inviting me into their humble home, generously sharing whatever food they had, refusing to let me chip in because all they wanted was to practice their English And as I sat cuddling their babies, enjoying their hospitality and home cooking, in the back of my mind, I kept thinking, If only Africans weren't so promiscuous. But now I can't stop thinking that half of those children who warmly invited me, this complete stranger into their home may be dead and lamenting, if only Africans weren't so trusting. Scientists. The least we can do is get to the bottom of this. The 1957 Congo polio vaccine was covered in episode 7, which I naively thought was the big scandal. So let's dig into the Merck vaccine. Speaker 6: Gallo and others identified HIV, human immunodeficiency virus, as the cause of AIDS. And Hilleman quickly showed that it was incapable of surviving his inactivation process. The vaccine was safe. Speaker 0: In doctor Offit's book, the definitive debunking of the conspiracy theory that Merck's vaccine caused the AIDS pandemic, he noted development started when doctor Prince quote, took blood from people before and after they received transfusions. Oh, but he forgot one key detail hiding in plain sight on the NIH website. The transfusions involved, quote, cross circulation between the human patient's circulatory system and that of a healthy chimpanzee. He references this paper by the Vaccines Inventor. But curiously, he forgot to include the opening paragraph, which described the development and evaluation in chimpanzees of a vaccine against hepatitis B. The patent application states the number one method of vaccination is injecting humans with blood plasma of a carrier chimpanzee previously inoculated with human hepatitis. Now, would any scientist patent something they never tested? His book concedes Merck's vaccine did contain the AIDS virus. But while Turing as Merck was not responsible for introducing that chimpanzee virus to the American gay community, he fails to acknowledge anywhere the development involved injecting Americans with at times raw and unprocessed chimpanzee blood prior to which the gay community with AIDS free. Doctor. Offutt omits a quote from his colleague declaring it for the greater good to conduct early experiments on those, quote, human in form, but not in social potential, including orphans, the mentally disabled, Africans under apartheid and colonial rule. And it would seem in Doctor. Offit's own words, quote, the gay community at the New York Blood Center where, quote, they recruited a 1,000 homosexual men with these flyers in New York's gay bars and bathhouses. The same year the patent for injecting humans with chimp blood was granted, Merck and the CDC began formal national trials in New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles, assuring participants the vaccine's safety and efficacy had already been proven in previous trials. Now, I found references to those previous trials starting around 1973. And it seems they always started by archiving population of white blood samples to measure hepatitis prevalence. In 1974, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Uncle legislated the mandatory archiving of all pharmaceutical experiment materials and data in response to the Tuskegee scandal. Now, I assume this archive must contain specifics who Merck injected, when, where, what species blood was used and what purification process, if any, was employed. If for whatever reason, Merck hasn't already done so, then testing those pre 1978 blood samples they collected before, during, and after the experiments, samples which Kennedy's uncle forced them to preserve would prove whether or not Merck introduced AIDS to America. Yet, I only find mention of the trials, but not the trial data. It's inconceivable that Polof, at a top level Merck insider, authoring the definitive defense of Merck, would not have asked for the pre 1978 trial data that would definitively prove or disprove Merck's innocence. Unless, Silly me. I forgot. Doctor Offit proves that won't be necessary because the CDC already identified patient 0 who brought AIDS to America. See, it's trolley, doggy, Gaten Dougas, whose sexual escapades were legendary. Seriously, Offit, did you not do any fact checking? No. The CDC never called in patient 0. He arrived to the US in the middle of the AIDS pandemic, not at the beginning. He's on the list of quote, times in history that a scapegoat was blamed and people fell for it. Speaker 5: Doctor Offit holds a 1,500,000 Dollar research chair at Children's Hospital funded by Merck, and future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182,000,000 cash. Speaker 4: So you don't think you have any conflict of interest here as a guy who created a vaccine as someone who would be seen as not wanting to speak out against this particular vaccine. Speaker 5: Of course not. What motivated me to do that and the reward from doing that was was was, of course, not financial. My interest is in trying to represent the science of vaccine safety so that parents under can understand it, so they won't make bad decisions that put their children at risk. Speaker 0: Somehow, off its definitive defense of Merck just sweeps under the rug the entire AIDS pandemic that killed 10 times more people than the Holocaust. And like that, the world's health agencies, scientists and pharma industry, wipe their hands, relieved some dead flight attendant, unable to defend himself, was to blame for the death of 40,000,000 people. No need to dig deeper. Case closed. Merck's innocent. Sorry. I do follow the science And that means I need to see the data. So unless somebody claims that $1,000 by proving I just had a brain fart, Hand over the receipts, bitch. Since Merck hasn't complied with Kennedy's law requiring their release, here's my offer to give $1,000 to whoever comes forward with the data on the trials. Now, if the data is already out there and proves AIDS was not Merck's greatest gift to America, don't send me insults. Just send me the data link and your payment instructions. I swear, I'll honor my word and apologize for this false alarm. But if it is being withheld, well, what do we suppose that means? Well, one thing it definitely means is only a high ranking Merck whistleblower could produce it. And the last time Merck's scientists blew the whistle over falsified MMR trial data, it led to a decade long legal battle with Merck seeking their imprisonment for disclosing confidential records. Now, considering Merck's aggressive stance against whistleblowers who didn't even reveal any harm, Imagine if one comes forward with proof Merck's vaccine killed more people than the world wars. If that's the case, my $1,000 pledge, it's not even a drop in the bucket. Now if I were rich, I just put $50,000,000 in escrow for whoever comes forward, but I'm not. I've spent my whole life developing free software in the public domain, So all I can do is donate Factbit and plead with all of you. Please, let's get a 1000000 people to pledge a small amount like $50. It can't hurt. Worst case, we sent a post and nothing happens. But if we get enough posts, it, so our combined bounty sufficiently compensates someone for coming forward, will change history and maybe take down the globalist organizations. Potential whistleblowers can track our pledges on factbid.org, then come forward when it's adequate and post their donation instructions so we can have their back if satisfied and cover their legal costs and help them start a new life in exile. I will repost claims, so followers won't miss the chance to honor pledges. Every time I make this plea. The porters privately tell me I'm crazy for sticking my neck out like this. But there's strength in numbers. The CIA can't take out a 1000000 people posting on X. Aren't there others who are not willing to just roll over and let those empowered do whatever the hell they want with no accountability. I cannot be the only one willing to stand up. If there's another way of doing this or anybody else trying, let me know and I'll join their cause. And if you doubt there was a massive cover up, explain why Google shows that bombshell FDA report that rewrites the origin of AIDS has only been referenced one time here, which doesn't even mention Merck or vaccines or that the test results showed Africa was AIDS free when Merck arrived in 1981. The bombshell that contradicts everything the authors are claiming is reference number 107. But nothing in their paper even mentions 107. Okay. Now for the WHO pandemic treaty, please consider. Speaker 5: He was dealing with perception more than reality. And the perception was that HIV was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survived the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. So ultimately, he had to abandon it. Speaker 2: It was a tough period. I'm sure it was tough on the company because they invested in making that vaccine. It was tough on Maurice himself. Speaker 0: Poor Merck. Let's not shed too many tears for Merck's struggle getting Americans to reject anti vaxx misinformation and obey demands to get the jab, we've already seen American Finnish trials in more compliant markets, in eastern sub Saharan Africa and eastern China, where good, obedient citizens submitted to mandates without defying their leaders like those rebellious Americans. But if viable AIDS virus was in the vaccine, I think that means in 1980s, Had Americans been subservient like the Chinese and Africans and just obeyed, then all American children would have received that same vaccine teen given in Sub Saharan Africa and perhaps suffered the same fate with 1 third of us dying. Life expectancy plummeting to 34 years and the U. S, like those African countries, becoming a failed state. And if today's misinformation, censorship apparatus existed back then, just like Africans, Americans who would believe we brought this calamity upon ourselves by our decadent sexual revolution. If it was the vaccine, I guess what saved America was that back then, our rebellious libertarian roots hadn't yet withered away. We demanded our free speech right to propagate anti vax misinformation and conspiracy theories. Speaker 3: What about the new hepatitis B vaccine? Speaker 0: Brazenly fine mandates from the CDC, WHO, and health leaders all ordering us to roll up our sleeves. Speaker 5: I have no problem with mandates. I'm all for them. Speaker 7: Often, if you don't take these products, you can't go to school. You can't become a nurse. You can't become a doctor. You can't go work in a hospital. So these are, you know, these are these are serious and if the pharma industry and health authorities quote unquote health authorities have their way, you won't be able to do anything in American society without taking these Speaker 0: us. In contrast to today's laws, where we become silenced and doctors lose their licenses for strain from the WHO and CDC vaccine safety narrative, back then, doctors faced no repercussions for fearlessly refusing to comply. Speaker 1: Here at the hospital said he should be receiving the vaccine. Speaker 0: And doctor Offit confirms, that is what forced Merck to develop a newer, more expensive, blood free version for the U. S. Market while continuing to sell the cheap blood derived version in other markets. Remember, other pharma companies were far more reckless than Merck because even after AIDS was well understood, companies like Bayer, continue to source cheap blood from prisons rather than pay more for expensive screened blood. When authorities learned FDA approved products did contain live AIDS virus and were infecting 1,000, We know for a fact, US officials not only helped pharma hide this from the public, they let American Pharma continue selling the cheaper contaminated versions in poor countries, fully aware they were infecting people with AIDS just to boost the profits of the pharma companies those officials later went to work for. We dodged a bullet as the only reason this didn't cause a pandemic was because those products were limited to ailing adults rather than vaccines injected in healthy babies. The central point of my video is that if you agree it might have been the vaccine, that means if the pending WHO pandemic treaty with its mandates, vaccine passports, and misinformation censorship rules existed back then, we all might have been forced to take The safest vaccine. Possibly for many years after suspicions arose since nobody would have dared speak up and risk their social credit score or having their CBDC wallets and digital ID frozen, Merck would not have Speaker 5: He had to abandon it. Speaker 0: The massacre would be America's Tiananmen Square that nobody knows even happened. Speaker 8: Digital platforms are being misused to subvert science and spread disinformation. This clear and present global threat demands clear and coordinated global action. It proposed its proposals are aimed at creating guardrails To help governments come together around guidelines that promote facts while exposing conspiracies and lies. Speaker 0: Many are warning about surrendering our liberty to the globalist organizations, but I don't see one other proposal for something we can do right now to stop them. Whining about it and going to courts and congressional hearings is getting us nowhere. But if we come together and incentivize a whistleblower to come forward with something of that magnitude, hopefully, finally, lambs will take note of the wolves in sheep's clothing and demand their treaty be repurposed. Let's follow the science. But to do that, we need to incentivize someone to hand over the data. So please, fact check me and then post your pledge.
JimmyCobalt
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 3:04 PM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 6:31 PM

@JimmyCobalt - Jimmy

#AIDS is from a vaccine You are 100% CORRECT! . Here is their patent to produce the Hepatitis B #Vaccine used in the homosexual male trials in NYC, and San Francisco, using chimpanzee Blood plasma. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4118479A/en?assignee=New+York+Blood+Center+Inc&num=100&scholar&sort=old&dups=language&clustered=true… .

IanCopeland5
Posted - October 1, 2023 at 7:55 AM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 8:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion on the importance of COVID-19 vaccination was met with claims about the Hepatitis B vaccine and its alleged connection to AIDS. The person making the claims offered a reward for evidence supporting their argument. They mentioned studies, batch issues, and the withholding of key evidence. The conversation ended with a challenge to provide the evidence and claim the reward.

@IanCopeland5 - Ian Copeland, PhD

Yet more data showing the importance of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in 2023. Not that the antivaxers care....or can read.... https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/72/wr/mm7225a4.htm

Effectiveness of Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination in ... This report describes COVID-19 bivalent vaccine effectiveness among nursing home residents. cdc.gov

@factbid - factbid.org

I will repeat the offer I made in your space to give $1,000 to whoever addresses the issue. I brought FACTS: FACT: The 1974-78 the Hep B vaccine was developed through tests on the gay community. Those included pumping fresh chimp blood into the men, and using the blood to make a vaccine. FACT: The Merck/CDC studies show the AIDS community was AIDS-free before the experiments and 70% of trial participants became HIV+. Yes, the CDC claimed that was just a coincidence and they didn't find HIV in the batches they tested, BUT, as admitted by Merck's vax expert, Paul Offit (who is probably the most cited pro-vax expert and who you called a clown in your space btw), there were batches made that did not follow Hilleman's inactivation process and which Hilleman (the vax inventor) feared contained live virus. We don't know what happened to them, but we do know the FDA helped Bayer liquidate in poor countries HIV-tainted products that WERE giving people AIDS, all to avoid Bayer having to write them off. FACT: Merck couldn't sell the vaccine in the US and dumped it in Sub-Saharan Africa which per their own studies had a <1% AIDS rates with a 95% CI FACT: 2 years later 6% were positive, and 4 years later up to 1/3. The lion's share had no sexual relations for at least 1 year, and studies concluded AIDS was not principally being transmitted sexually but likely through injections. Unverified: In Cold Case Hammarskjold several ex-members of South Africa's Apartheid-era private military contractor SAIMR admitted they setup free clinics in black parts of South Africa with the goal of eradicating the block population, and one came forward and confessed they gave the black community a vaccine they knew would accelerate the spread of AIDS. That cannot be verified. But, IF it's true, then the the reason so many died is because for 12+ years, all the scientific community did what you just did the space and dismissed the idea as ridiculous and refused to even entertain it. They didn't even bother testing or investigating. I laid out the facts, and while there is no peer-reviewed study saying AIDS came from the vaccine, there are many that suggest as much, and, the most important part, is Merck and the CDC are withholding the key evidence that would prove it one way or another. The test results from the 1,495 kangwane samples in 1983, and the pre-1978 New York samples. There's no reason to withhold them unless.... That's why I offered $1,000 to the first person who can find those results. If, like you say, I'm just making this stuff up and haven't done my homework, send the results and claim the $1,000. @debunk_the_funk can confirm I paid him, and I do pay up when I make these bets. No need for insults, just send the link, and claim the $1,000 and we'll be done with it. https://factbid.org/transcript/17

Unearthed FDA Document Rewrites the Narrative on AIDS, Gays, Africans, and Vaccines?! Watch now (24 mins) | $1,000 reward to fact-check and debunk. FDA doc proves: Inventors of Merck's vax tested on gay men WERE injecting humans with chimp blood, and there was no AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa when the jabs be factbid.substack.com
tatiann69922625
Posted - November 7, 2023 at 10:26 AM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 7:51 AM

@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine

Le secret de 40 ans du CDC & Merck a été révélé Taux d'infection par le sida pendant l'essai Heptavax du CDC Vaccin : 42 % vs Placebo : 9 %😔⬇️

@factbid - factmission.org

CDC & Merck 40 year old secret revealed AIDS Infection Rate during CDC Heptavax trial Vaccine: 42% vs Placebo: 9% https://t.co/0LLhA3dII3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows a significant increase in HIV infection rates among trial participants. The speaker also mentions the controversial methods used to produce the vaccine, including the use of infected feces and chimpanzee blood. They suggest that the HIV contamination was not properly disclosed to the public and that the vaccine was sold in poor countries while safe versions were introduced in wealthier markets. The speaker proposes the establishment of a neutral foundation to investigate the issue further and requests support for this initiative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Wilson asserts that this CDC report settles the matter of Merck's blood derived Heptavax being among the many injectables that contained infectious HIV in the 1980s. I agree. Here is the CDC's own data behind their report. Now, everyone knows at the start of the CDC trial, 0% of participants had HIV, and at the end, 42%. So here's Merck's explanation. Speaker 1: He was dealing with perception more than reality, and the perception was that that HIV was was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly, survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. Speaker 0: In 1983, when doctors refused heptavax over AIDS fears, officials confirmed 2 trial participants had contracted this yet unidentified disease, and both had received vaccine, not placebo. But they said, 2 cases out of 1,000 didn't justify hesitating to take the vaccine. But months later, A test for the virus was available, revealing almost half the trial participants were infected. But the rate among SIBO recipients became a closely guarded secret. Identifying it took months of digging through physical archives, asking Chachapiti to dissect tens of thousands of pages of scientific papers and following breadcrumbs to calculate it from clues. For the first time, we know the HIV infection rate among the CDC trial participants who received placebo was 9%. Instead of revealing the placebo rate, the CDC compared trial participants against those excluded due to their prior STDs. But even among that group labeled higher risk, the rate was 23% when the trial ended. The CDC compared the 1984 numbers after the higher risk group had caught up. They falsely claimed to compare those excluded against vaccine recipients. They actually compare it against all trial participants, including placebo. Since the placebo rate was 9%, the rate among vaccine recipients must be higher? Before diving into where Merck sold heptavax, after seeing these numbers, a quick recap of how it was made. In the 19 sixties, scientists harvested antigens by feeding infected feces to disabled children who they labeled, quote, human informed but not in social potential. When RFK's dad made it illegal, scientists confirmed chimpanzee and human blood were compatible by letting Blood cross circulate through IV tubes. Humans survived being filled with raw, unprocessed chimp blood. Around 100,000 primates were imported each year to test these viruses. Here's a list of some other viruses they were found to carry. At the time, nobody knew 20% of chimps carried a virus that was harmless to them but caused AIDS in humans. The FDA, CDC, NIH, and NIAID plus pharma infected chimps with human hepatitis to a mass plasma pools with antigens used in numerous experimental vaccines. Some used only heat to kill whatever unknown viruses lurked. In 1978, the patent was issued for heptavax made from the blood of chimpanzees. When Merck decided to test on New York's gay community, 13,000 blood samples were collected. Upon retesting, Not one had HIV. After Merck's experiments, New York had more HIV cases than all other cities combined in the US or Europe. When an HIV test became available, health officials realized many blood based injectables from various pharma companies were contaminated. US health officials hid this from the public and Congress, letting companies dump contaminated inventory in poor countries while introducing safe versions in affluent markets. This led to a landmark settlement. Doctor Offitze claimed that Merck was the 1 pharma company that, quote, abandoned this inventory is demonstrably false. The same year Merck's competitors sold their HIV contaminated products overseas, The Swazi in Congo in South Africa began their heptivax campaign using lot 751, the same lot trialed on the gay community almost a decade prior. This survey found no infection among the Swazi pre vaccination post 40% of the general population was infected. Now such a high infection rate might be plausible among young urban gays, But how does this happen among rural, conservative, Christian families in sparsely populated farming villages with a capital of 1,000 inhabitants? Why were babies infected but not their mothers? Now true, most Swazi new mothers were infected, but pregnant women were also vaccinated. Why were their husbands uninfected? These regions where women, but not adult men, Got heptavax? Were the only regions where AIDS primarily infected women. Right next to the Swazi is Venda, which shares the same demographic. Yet, while the Swazi had the highest rate, next door Venda had been spared with the lowest rate for nearly 10 years. Then in the 19 nineties, Venda became the last state to get what was still left of Merck's 20 year old heptavax inventory, after which vendor's rates caught up. Here is the HIV infection rate in Congo, Central Africa, the epicenter since the 19 fifties. Now here it is to the north and here to the south where Merck continued selling heptavax a decade after seeing the CDC trial results. South Africa's 1st HIV positive case was a gay man infected in the US. For 5 years, it exclusively affected South Africa's gay community, but then it exploded among black heterosexuals at a rate not seen since the CDC trials while curiously sparing whites under apartheid. 1990 scientists eviscerated institutions for ignoring the evidence that the majority of the tens of millions of new infections could only be explained by injection, not sex. I'm setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to get the facts. Swiss charitable foundations are the most trusted as they are tightly regulated and dissolved if they mismanage funds, lack transparency, or deviate from the founding charter. Fact Mission's charter will require a diverse board of advisers and strict Swiss style neutrality to counterbalance my personal bias. Every FACT mission must strictly hire independent, conflict free researchers to follow the protocol negotiated between all interested parties, including pharma companies that accept the invitation to participate. To prevent internal conflicts as well as external, the charter will prohibit taking sides stating opinions, hypotheses, or conclusions. It must exclusively fund neutral research to test external hypotheses and stop at publishing raw data. Uniquely, the Charter will obligate protecting sources. 100 must have known this but never came forward. When conservative Swiss regulators confirm it's appropriate, the foundation will fund asylum and relocation costs for those facing credible threats. Again, the charter requires neutrality, prohibiting commenting it only covers costs to protect the source. For this mission, I propose beginning with digitizing medical records from early AIDS cases, test any remaining blood samples, collect eyewitness testimony, and identify differences in the medical interventions given to blacks and whites under apartheid. The only financial benefit I might indirectly receive relates to my COVID vaccine injury a few hours after I was Forced to get the jab despite having just recovered from severe COVID, I had a very severe inflammatory response. My health insurance refused to cover, claiming vaccine injuries must be reimbursed by government programs. However, those also refused because health agencies cannot identify a causal link. Perhaps researching heptavax will demonstrate they don't always reliably report vaccine harms, thus clearing our biggest hurdle. Jurors might accept doctor Offit's expert opinion that COVID vaccines are less safe than Merck's heptavax, which he concluded was Speaker 1: the safest vaccine we've ever used. Speaker 0: I respectfully ask for your support by sending an email to this address indicating how much you would be able to donate to the First Fact Mission. If there are enough pledges, I will, at my expense, register the foundation. Then I will send pledgers an email with instructions to donate and verify the foundation's charter legal status, and that funds will be managed by independent auditors required to disclose all transparently and vacs, exclusively fund the fact finding mission. Interested partners? Please reach out. Thank you.
catsscareme2021
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 7:10 PM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 12:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've come across a video discussing the alleged creation of AIDS at Fort Detrick and its distribution through the Hepatitis B vaccine. Additionally, there's a lecture by Dr. Leonard Horowitz on emerging viruses like HIV, Polio, Hepatitis, and Ebola.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

One of the best videos I've watched on how AIDS was created at Fort Detrick and then given to Merck for distribution via the Hepatitis B vaccine.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert Charles Gallo, a biomedical researcher, is known for his role in discovering HIV and developing the HIV blood test. However, secret government documents revealed that Gallo had a connection to the creation of HIV. The HIV virus was created at the Litton BioNetics facility under the National Cancer Institute, with financial investors including Roy Asch, Henry Kissinger, and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller. The virus was distributed by the Merck Pharmaceutical Company, and mentally handicapped children were used in contaminated vaccination trials. The virus was later introduced to the American public through a hepatitis B vaccination trial in 1978. The spread of HIV in Africa was also linked to a smallpox vaccine eradication program by the World Health Organization. The creation of HIV was part of a larger biowarfare program funded by the US military.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A PDF search will show that Robert Charles Gallo is an American biomedical researcher and is best known for his role in the discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus and in the development of the HIV blood test and he has been a major contributor to subsequent HIV research. However, once secreted government documents revealed by Doctor. Leonard Horowitz in his book, emerging viruses, AIDS and Ebola, nature, accident or intentional, show that Doctor. Gallo has a direct communication to the creation of what we call the HIV virus. Now remember these names people Roy Asch, Henry Kissinger and Vice President, Nelson Rockefeller were all financial investors in a company called Litton BioNetics under the new National Cancer Institute, BioNetics administration at the Army's Fort Detrick facility. This is where AIDS was created. These people started a program called the Special Virus Cancer Program that began in 1962, which engaged in cancer virus studies using Litton Biometics supplied monkeys and chimpanzees by 1966, Littmann Biometics researchers advanced recombinant retroviruses causing the never before seen leukemia, lymphoma, Sarcoma, Immune Suppressive Cancers and by 1968, studies describing these developments were published. In 1968, Doctor. Gallo was the National Cancer Institute's Project Officer at Litton BioNetics, where new cancer viruses that were descriptively and functionally identical to HIVAIDS were being created and tested. A year later in 1969, Henry Kissinger, while serving as the White House National Security Advisor, selected the option for the use of these bio weapons for the military and by 1970, the United States Defense Department ordered these viruses for use. Now we come to the German Merck family, which began selling drugs in 16/68. Litton BioMetics supplied the Merck Pharmaceutical Company with the bioweapon that we now call HIV and AIDS to the world. And this was even admitted by the company's then Vaccine Chief Maurice Hilleman. And one of the first places they experimented these bioweapons on, was mentally handicapped children at Willowbrook State School through a contaminated hepatitis B vaccination trial between 1970 and 1974. By 1976, after incubating the new BioNetics Engineered and Merck supplied viruses for 2 to 5 years, the children at Willowbrook were rumored to be ill with a strange new disease. This was just the beginning of what we now call HIV and AIDS. This is the true story as to how HIVAIDS was created during the late 1960s and early 1970s, originally stemming from Litton Biometics and distributed by Merck through contaminated vaccination trials. Now this is how AIDS was distributed into the American populace. This new bioweapon was then introduced to the American public through a hepatitis B vaccination trial conducted at the New York Blood Bank in 1978. The experiment at the New York Blood Bank was run by a man named Wolf Zemunas, who joined the New York Blood Center in 69 and headed its Laboratory of Epidemiology since 1973. This hepatitis B vaccination trial was specifically for gay men who were injected with the vaccine at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan during the period of November, 1978 to October, 1979. As quoted in the New York Times, Zimunes was in charge of the hepatitis B vaccine field trials that began in 1978 and that were conducted among ten 83 male homosexuals. Researchers in these labs led by Wolf Zemunaz used the contaminated hepatitis B vaccines delivered from Merck, which infected these gay men in New York. Similar hepatitis B vaccine experiments were conducted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis and Chicago beginning in 1980. Months after the experiment began, the first cases of AIDS reported to the CDC appeared in Young Gay Men in Manhattan in 1979. The first San Francisco AIDS case appeared in the city in September 1980, 6 months after the hepatitis B experiment started there. In June 1981, the AIDS epidemic became official. Speaker 1: Scientists at the National Centers For Disease Control in Atlanta today released the results of a study which Which shows that the lifestyle of some male homosexuals has triggered an epidemic of a rare form of cancer. Robert Bazell now in Atlanta. Speaker 2: Bobby Campbell of San Francisco and Billy Walker of New York both suffer from a mysterious newly discovered disease, Which affects mostly homosexual men, but has also been found in heterosexual men and women. The condition severely weakens the body's ability to fight disease. Many victims get a rare form of cancer called Kaposi's sarcoma. Others get an infection known as pneumocystis pneumonia. Researchers know of 413 people who have contracted the condition in the past year. One third have died and none have been cured. Speaker 3: Death didn't scare me. It was it was, living with this for a long time. That's more frightening than, than death. Speaker 2: Investigators have examined the habits of homosexuals for CREW. I was in the fast lane at one time in terms of the way that I live my life, and now I'm not. The best guess is that some infectious agent is causing it. Today, researchers here at the National Centers For Disease Control said They have found several cases where people who had been sex partners both had the condition. The scientists say this probably means they are dealing with some new deadly sexually Transmitted disease. The investigators see this as a serious public health problem. Speaker 4: From an epidemic point of view, there have been more deaths from Kaposi's sarcoma and pneumocystis pneumonia than have occurred with all the cases of toxic shock syndrome and the Philadelphia outbreak of Legionnaires disease combined. Speaker 2: Researchers are now studying blood and other samples from the victims, trying to learn what is causing the disease. So far they have had no luck. Robert Bezel, NBC News, Atlanta. Speaker 0: After the hepatitis B experiment ended, Wolf Samunes insisted that all 13,000 blood specimens donated by gay men be retained at the Blood Center for future use. Several years later, when this blood was retested for the presence of HIV antibodies, government epidemiologists were able to detect the introduction and the spread of HIV into the gay community. Zimmunas himself said that one day another disease may erupt and will need this material. The retesting of gay blood at the Blood Center proved that HIV was first introduced into the gay population of New York City sometime around 1978 till 1979, the same year the hepatitis B vaccine trials under Zimouna's leadership began. Similar to the outbreak of HIVAIDS following the hepatitis B vaccination trials was the Smallpox vaccine eradication programs sponsored by the World Health Organization in Africa. On May 11, 1987, the London Times, one of the world's most respected newspapers published a front page story entitled Smallpox Vaccine Triggered AIDS Virus. The story suggests that AIDS in Africa is a direct outgrowth of the World Health Organization's Smallpox Eradication Program. The Time story is one of the most important stories ever printed on the AIDS epidemic, yet the story was killed and never appeared in any major in the U. S. Newspaper or magazine. Millions of Africans are reportedly infected with HIV. This large number could never have been infected by the simple act of a monkey virus jumping over to infect 1 African in the late 1970s. If that were the case, why don't we now have millions of AIDS cases in the U. S? The obvious explanation for the results of millions of Africans infected with AIDS is just like that of the hepatitis B vaccines that were given to select gay populaces living in major metropolitan cities in the US. The vaccinations are biological weapons intended for mass depopulation. Henry Kissinger has quoted himself as stating in 1973, depopulation should be the highest priority of foreign policy towards the third world, because the US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries. A decade before the first cases of AIDS, Doctor. Donald M. MacArthur, a spokesman for the U. S. Department of Defense told a congressional hearing that a Supergerm could be developed as part of our experimental biowarfare program. This genetically engineered germ would be very different from any previous microbe known to mankind. The agent would be a highly effective killing agent because the immune system would be powerless against this super microbe. A transcript of the meeting on synthetic biological agents, records the following comments of Doctor. MacArthur. Number 1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease and thus are known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would be probably it would probably be possible to make a new, to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease from any known disease causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease. A research program to explore the feasibility of this to be complete in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10,000,000. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular Biology is a relatively new science. There are not many competent scientists in the field, almost all are in university laboratories and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than the Department of Defense. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council. The matter was discussed with the NASNRC and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing funds in chemical biological research, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NASNRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken, let it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. Should an enemy develop it, there is little doubt that it is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program. This testimony proves further that HIV was created in biowarfare laboratories, organized by organized by specific branches of the U. S. Military and funded through U. S. Army government contracted pharmaceutical companies. During the 1970s, the U. S. Army's Biowarfare Program intensified, particularly in the area of DNA and gene splicing research. Renouncing germ warfare except for medical defensive research, President Richard Nixon in 1971 ordered that a major part of the Army's biowarfare research be transferred over to the National Cancer Institute, exactly where HIV would be discovered a decade later by Doctor. Robert Gallo.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Dr. Leonard Horowitz - A Lecture on Emerging viruses, HIV, Polio, Hepatitis, Ebola https://www.bitchute.com/video/9jsd2DA4fKis/

Dr. Leonard Horowitz - A Lecture on Emerging viruses, HIV, Polio, Hepatitis, Ebola Dr. Leonard Horowitz exposes the deliberate creation of hybridized viruses collaborated by various organizations. bitchute.com
catsscareme2021
Posted - February 16, 2024 at 3:11 PM
Saved - February 16, 2024 at 5:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the Gardasil trials, aluminum hydroxide was used as the "placebo," and 1 in 733 participants died. The clinical trials had 29,323 subjects, with 40 deaths in total. Merck claims the deaths were not higher than expected in the general population. The most common cause of death was motor vehicle accidents. Neurological events, like seizures and syncope, were frequent adverse events. The vaccine only protects against a few strains of HPV, leaving vaccinated individuals vulnerable to other strains. Regular Pap smears reduced cervical cancer incidence by 75% before the vaccine. There is concern that vaccinated individuals may skip Pap smears, increasing the risk of invasive disease. The long-term impact on preventing cervical cancer is still unknown.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Did you know that the Gardasil trials used Aluminum hydroxide as the "placebo?" AND 1 in 733 trial participants died. In the clinical trials for Gardasil 1 in 733 study participants died. It's in the manufacturers insert. At the bottom of page 7. Link to Merck's insert for Gardasil: fda.gov/downloads/Biol… There were 29,323 subjects in the clinical trials. One trial of 594 used a true saline placebo. The others used the aluminum adjuvant as the control - there was no true placebo in those trials because aluminum is in the vaccine to ramp up the immune response, so therefore it cannot be a placebo. There were 40 deaths - 21 in the vaccine group and 19 in the aluminum adjuvant group. 29,323/40=733 There were no deaths in the saline group. If you subtract them, the death rate goes to 1 in 718. Merck says it's coincidence and the deaths were no higher than what would be expected in the general population. They say that because there was no statistical difference between the vaccine (experimental) group and the aluminum (control) group. The most frequent cause of death was motor vehicle accident, with 9 deaths total. Provax folks say, "So now you're going to blame Gardasil for causing car accidents!" Yes. Here's why... The most frequent non-fatal adverse events were neurological events, including seizures and syncope (sudden alteration of consciousness), which obviously increases the risk of dying in car accidents. According to Dr. Diane Harper, Internationally renowned expert on HPV and principal developer of the vaccine, any protection that is conferred lasts only five years and will leave those vaccinated in adolescence unprotected at the very time when they are most at risk of infection. The vaccine only covers a few strains out of more than 100, which will cause those strains not covered to become more virulent and more resistant to treatment. Regular Pap smears reduced the incidence of cervical cancer in the US by 75% before the vaccine was developed. There is a very real concern that those girls who are vaccinated will have a false sense of security and forego paps, which will increase the risk of developing invasive disease. Cancers that are presumed to be caused by HPV are slow growing and take decades to develop. There has not been enough time since the HPV vaccine was licensed in 2006 to determine if there will be any effect in preventing cervical cancer.

DiedSuddenly_
Posted - February 18, 2024 at 3:59 AM
Saved - February 18, 2024 at 11:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The WHO administered 50 million smallpox vaccines to Africans. An article in The Times claimed the vaccine caused AIDS infections, but media coverage on this issue ceased. The reason behind this lack of further discussion remains unclear.

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

The WHO injected Africans with over 50 million smallpox vaccines. On May 11, 1987, an article under this headline was published in the British The Times: "The smallpox vaccine caused a wave of infections with the AIDS virus." It was never mentioned by the media again. Why do you think that is?

RefugeOfSinner5
Posted - March 26, 2024 at 12:44 PM
Saved - March 27, 2024 at 10:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the Gardasil vaccine trial, the placebo contained the same potentially toxic ingredient as the vaccine itself, raising concerns about safety. Both groups experienced a 3% incidence of new autoimmune conditions. The CDC director who approved the vaccine later joined the manufacturer, Merck, with a $4 million signing bonus. Various individuals and organizations are tagged in this post for reference.

@RefugeOfSinner5 - RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

Did you know that the placebo arm in the childhood vaccine trials is often not saline? In the Gardasil trial of 2007 (HPV vaccine) the placebo contained aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate, as did the vaccine arm. "If you've put the toxic agent in both, how can you see the safety signal?" 3% of both groups came down with new autoimmune conditions. And the CDC director, who approved this vaccine, Julie Gerberding, moved to Merck one year later, with a signing bonus of $4 million. Merck is the manufacturer of Gardasil. @BrianHookerPhD

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2007 trial, the placebo contained a toxic agent, affecting the comparison between vaccine and control groups. Both groups had 3% new autoimmune conditions, but it was dismissed. The lack of questioning raises concerns about vaccine safety. Comparing the 3% to general population rates would be logical. Individuals like Julie Gerberding and Peter Marks, who have ties to big pharma, may overlook such issues. Gerberding's move from CDC director to Merck's vaccines president with a $4,000,000 bonus raises ethical questions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just everyone, just to remind everybody then, that got us all 2007 trial, the placebo was not saline. It was this Alaminin Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate. Right? So and the reason that it's I mean, you said it, Brian, but I just wanna make sure that people are really listening and understanding. The reason it's so bad to have the placebo containing a toxic agent is that me what they do in these studies is they compare the injuries that occur in the live vaccine group to the control group, and they're looking for any anomalies, like is there any markers that there are more injuries in the live vaccine group compared to the control group? But if you've put the toxic agent in both Right. Groups, you're not going to see the safety marker, the safety signal. Speaker 1: There's no difference. There's no difference. And the thing that was preposterous about this trial is that 3% of the control group and 3% of the vaccinated group both came down with new autoimmune conditions. 3%. I mean, that's preposterous. And and they never questioned it. They said, oh, well, the control group and the, and the vaccinated group, had the same result. And so, there is no difference. And so, the vaccine is safe. No, it's not safe. You've, you've proved that the control and the vaccinated group, have had something that's very, very toxic injected into them, you know, why else would you have a 3% new cases of autoimmune disorders? Speaker 0: And would it not be sensible to compare that 3% with what would be the expected number of new autoimmune conditions over that time period in the general population. Right? Is that not the obvious comparison you should be making? Speaker 1: Right. Unless you're waiting at the ATM to cash your, you know, big pharma check, and then then that is the incentive to be able to look the other way. And this is just sort of this hall of fame of individuals like Julie Gerberding, Peter Marks, you know, that have been on the take for so many years that I've looked the other way. You know, when, and, and Julie Gerberding got Gardasil approved in the CDC. She was a CDC director, and it was approved and it was added to the, vaccination schedule in the United States with her being the CDC director. A year later, she gets a job as the president of vaccines at Merck, and she gets a signing bonus of $4,000,000 So now we know how much her soul is worth.

@RefugeOfSinner5 - RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

@ChildrensHD @ThatEricAlper @BeholdAmerica @KLVeritas @JohnOlooney @NassMeryl @KateShemirani @JanciToxDoc @MdBreathe @kacdnp91 @Jikkyleaks @_aussie17 @P_McCulloughMD @Kevin_McKernan @fluoridepoison @juneslater17 @r_hirschman @sasha_latypova @catsscareme2021 @BusyDrT @RobertKennedyJr @DrJudyAMikovits

_APWK_
Posted - May 10, 2024 at 5:13 AM
Saved - May 10, 2024 at 11:12 AM

@_APWK_ - Luiz

Vaccines are not tested against placebos because the harms would be too obvious. They are tested against other harmful vaccines. Testing against a placebo would show how harmful and ineffective ALL vaccines are. https://t.co/9RbSaTq8GJ

iluminatibot
Posted - June 3, 2024 at 4:03 AM
Saved - June 3, 2024 at 1:44 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

1960s news Flu vax found to be ineffective. Whistleblowers censored or fired. Military mandated Adenovirus vax which caused cancer in animal tests and took 3 years for it to be pulled from market. https://t.co/l7spRkGEzH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center admit the flu vaccine can be ineffective or harmful in large doses. Despite this, it is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee criticized the government for not informing the public about ineffective vaccines. The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for safety but not effectiveness. Some scientists found the flu vaccine ineffective but were silenced. The adenovirus vaccine was taken off the market after causing cancer in animals, despite scientists warning about it. American troops were given a cancer-causing vaccine for 3 years. Some division scientists were prevented from publishing results showing vaccines were ineffective. A control officer in 1960 raised concerns about the flu vaccine's potency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and the recommended dosage is ineffective. While in a larger dose, it can be harmful. However, the flu vaccine is still recommended for old people and the Speaker 1: chronically ill. Last month, a senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Ribicoff charged that the federal government wasn't doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Speaker 0: Scientists at the division of biologic standards test vaccines for their potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. 4 scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 19 sixties found it to be ineffective, said they refused to give it to their own families. 2 were transferred to other work, a third left the division. And over the entire 10 year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists, involves the adenovirus vaccine. A vaccine given to 1,000 of American soldiers to prevent certain cold like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. Speaker 2: But the vaccine contained a contaminant which Speaker 0: caused cancer. But that was 3 years after the division's own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took 3 years to examine the evidence against it. Speaker 3: It's more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. Speaker 2: More important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. Speaker 3: But since the agent couldn't be removed there was no other course. Speaker 0: Thus for 3 years, American troops were injected with a cold preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. Speaker 4: The control officer in, in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels.
MaryanneDemasi
Posted - July 2, 2024 at 12:37 AM
Saved - July 2, 2024 at 2:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Merck misled participants in the Gardasil HPV vaccine trial by providing false information about the placebo and the safety testing of the vaccine's adjuvant. Researchers discovered that the recruitment materials and informed consent forms contained misleading information. The adjuvant used in the vaccine, AAHS, is a potent neurotoxin. Merck has refused to disclose the full composition of AAHS. A lawsuit is currently underway against Merck, with claims that the vaccine can cause serious health issues.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

🧵Merck misled participants in Gardasil HPV vaccine trial Women were told the PLACEBO in the trial was inactive and that the vaccine's adjuvant had been safety tested - both were untrue. https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/merck-misled-participants-in-gardasil @jikkyleaks @stkirsch @SaiKate108 @KrugAlli @eileeniorio @woodymatters @MidwesternDoc @newstart_2024 @ClownWorld_ @ProfTimNoakes @WisnerBaum @RobertKennedyJr @CHDPennsylvania @WallStreetApes

Merck misled participants in Gardasil HPV vaccine trial Women were told the placebo in the trial was inactive and that the vaccine's adjuvant had been safety tested - both were untrue. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Researchers found the recruitment materials and informed consent forms given to volunteers in the trial contained misleading information, leading them to believe the study’s placebo was ‘saline’ or an ‘inactive’ substance, when it wasn’t.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Aluminium found in adjuvants is a known neurotoxin which is used in vaccines to induce a stronger immune response. But AAHS (in Gardasil HPV vaccine) is more potent than traditional aluminium adjuvants which have been used in vaccines for decades. https://content.iospress.com/articles/international-journal-of-risk-and-safety-in-medicine/jrs230032

A reactogenic “placebo” and the ethics of informed consent in Gardasil HPV vaccine clinical trials: A case study from Denmark - IOS Press BACKGROUND: Medical ethics guidelines require of clinical trial investigators and sponsors to inform prospective trial participants of all known and potential risks associated with investigational medical products, and to obtain their free informed c content.iospress.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Merck claims its AAHS formulation is proprietary and, to date, has refused to provide samples to independent researchers for testing, so the full composition of AAHS remains unknown. Tom Jefferson and I tried to find out what's in a placebo https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/whats-in-the-placebo?utm_source=publication-search

What's in the placebo? We tried to find out what was in the “placebo pill” of one of the most controversial statin trials ever conducted. blog.maryannedemasi.com

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

A lawsuit against Merck is underway at @WisnerBaum “So many of our clients grew up healthy and active only to be broadsided by this life-changing condition after receiving the vaccine. It’s time for Merck to do the right thing and admit that this dangerous vaccine is capable of causing POTS and other serious health issues,” said Michael Baum.

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

The full story 👇👇 https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/merck-misled-participants-in-gardasil

Merck misled participants in Gardasil HPV vaccine trial Women were told the placebo in the trial was inactive and that the vaccine's adjuvant had been safety tested - both were untrue. blog.maryannedemasi.com
petelincoln48
Posted - July 5, 2024 at 11:25 PM
Saved - July 7, 2024 at 6:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Salk Polio Vaccine was tested on 2 million children, but it was later discovered that the monkey kidney cultures used to grow the virus contained 28 different monkey viruses. One of the manufacturers, Cutter, failed to properly inactivate the virus, resulting in 260 confirmed cases of polio. The discovery of the SV-40 virus in the monkey kidneys used for the vaccines raised concerns about its potential to cause cancer. Despite evidence of its potential carcinogenicity, the government and vaccine manufacturers downplayed the risks. The preferred polio vaccine became Sabins live oral vaccine, which used SV-40-free monkey kidneys. The presence of SV-40 in the polio vaccines was later linked to brain cancer and mesothelioma. The NIH and CDC suppressed this information and conducted fake studies to refute the findings.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

1/The Salk Polio Vaccine RCT size was 2 million children. The virus was grown in monkey kidney cultures. These kidneys were found to contain 28 different monkey viruses. All which were presumed to be inactivated along with the polio virus after formalin treatment

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

2/Only 2 of the best 5 mfr were chosen to produce the vaccine for the trials with each lot undergoing rigorous independent testing and inspection to ensure each lot was free of live virus. After licensing all 5 mfr were allowed to Produce + approve lots based on their own tests

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

3/Sure enough, one of the new mfr named Cutter did not inactivate the virus properly. After 310,000 of its vaccine doses administered there were 260 confirmed Polio cases with 200 paralyzed

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

4/Sabins live activated vaccine was trialed in the Soviet Union in over 80 million people due to lack of funding available in US.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

5/A researcher at NIH named Eddy found a monkey virus in rhesus monkey kidney cultures that caused cancer in hamsters. These monkeys kidneys were used to produce both the inactivated Salks vaccine and Sabins vaccine. She was muzzled by NIH

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

6/Hilleman at Merck producing an inactivated Polio Vaccine announced the findings of his scientists that confirmed Eddy’s work. A virus named SV-40 was found in Rhesus monkey Kidney (RMK) cultures that could infect and kill cells in African Green Monkey (AGM) Kidney cultures

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

7/This meant testing of inactivated vaccine in RMK could not detect if the virus was inactivated. Testing by other researchers on humans (prisoners) discovered Sv-40 could infect humans and cause them to produce antibodies. The patients did not become ill.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

8/However, they were unaware of Eddys research which showed the virus caused cancer in hamsters as they aged. She had been unable to get published

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

9/Sabin claimed trial participants in Soviet Union were tested and found to be free of SV-40 antibodies. Either the Russians or Sabin were lying

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

10/After some discussion, DBS (todays FDA CBER) ruled if there was SV-40 it was ok if it was not “demonstrable”. Meaning if the mfr could not prove the live vaccine grows SV-40 in human cells it was ok

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

11/Eddy was allowed to prove her work that the virus caused tumors in hamsters to her boss at DBS. However, because the Russians were injecting their people this news was not allowed to be released by her boss. Curiously her boss died of cancer 3 years later

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

12/In 1961 came shocking news, scientists at Welcome Research Labs showed Sv-40 to be resistant to Formaldehyde (formalin). Salks inactivated vaccine contained live Sv-40 in many lots and Brits who had the vaccine had SV-40 antibodies

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

13/Moreover, an antiserum was developed that killed SV-40 in seed stocks used to initiate cultures. This meant the Sabins Live Oral Vaccine would became the preferred Polio Vaccine when it became licensed as it would use SV-40 free AGM kidneys to culture virus

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

14/ A PHS Technical Committee loaded with conflicted participants concluded in the absence of evidence of harm to humans, the virus should be presumed benign and stocks of contaminated vaccine could be used up. New lots of vaccines must be virus free. The public was not informed

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

15/Shortly after the Technical Committee decision, Merck discovered SV40 caused cancer in lab animals confirming Eddy’s work. The Technical Committees solution was to disregard it. It would not be until 1963 that the Vaccines would be SV-40 free (too late for me)

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

16/While the government was keeping all this secret, a guy named Koprowski at Wistar Institute announced at a AMA meeting that the Polio vaccines contained a cancer inducing Monkey Virus in June 1961.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

17/He also told them his Institute had developed a safe way to culture viruses in human cells, free of unknown Monkey Viruses

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

18/The DBS then reassured the public it was only a small amount and only in some lots and that no evidence of harm had been conducted after 6 years of vaccination

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

19/While the MSM was content to parrot the government line, Merck dropped out of the Polio Vaccine business deciding it was too risky. Only the National Enquirer (the Alex Jones Show equivalent) sounded the alarm🙄

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

20/One reason Merck dropped out of the game was their scientists had determined that SV-40 transformed human cells into cancer precursor cells. Hilleman at Merck decided not to disclose the results as they had liability for any damages

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

21/However, in 1962 one of the Merck scientists (Girardi) disclosed at the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting that SV-40 transformed human cells by altering one of its chromosomes and making them grow faster.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

22/Girardi would go on to work at Wistar in 1963 where he would find that SV-40 could not always be detected in culture in 14 days and could appear after 30 days. This is important as DBS standard for mfr was to test for 14 days. Despite being informed DBS made no change

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

23/Enders and Kopowski/Wistar both published their results on SV-40 transformation of human cells in mid-1962. DBS own research confirmed its potential carcinogenicity. But half of Americans had potentially been exposed to SV-40 by 1963. What to do?

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

24/The NCI embarked on a study to assess the effects and found no increase in cancer deaths among children who would had been given the vaccine at the age of 6-8 in 1955 by comparing incidence of cancer deaths in this period,

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

25/It was published in August 1963 and found no increase. MSM declared case closed, despite the fact cancers take years to develop, usually in older people as immune systems degrade, and they looked at only a few cancers and only at cancer deaths (it takes time to die of cancer).

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

26/Sabins live Vaccine by 1964 was the Vaccine of choice for most Americans. Grown on SV-40 AGM kidneys instead of human cells proposed by Wistar. SV-40 was only one of many Simian Viruses. Who knew what viruses AGM’s might have? Virology and virus sequencing was in its infancy

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

27/In 1967 a new Simian Virus infected 2 dozen people in Europe traced to African Green Monkeys (AGM) imported from Uganda and used to grow vaccine virus like Polio and Measles. Yet still the DBS saw no reason to change anything

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

28/SV-40 is a DNA virus and the first to be sequenced completely. It was discovered to contain two antigens that promoted cancer (large and small T antigens) in 1975 and led to the discovery of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in 1979. Most cancers result from inhibition of p53

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

29/In December 1992 a scientist from Dan Farber Cancer Center reported his discovery of SV-40 virus in Children Brain Cancer Biopsies

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

30/ Another scientist at NIH named Carbone who was interested in the link between SV-40 and human mesotheliomas and had recently found that SV-40 causes mesothelioma in hamsters used the study to convince his boss at NIH to pursue this (It was but w/o funding)

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

31/Asbestos alone can cause mesothelioma in some people but in some studies as many as 50% of mesothelioma patients reported no evidence of exposure to asbestos. Fewer than 5% of those heavily exposed to asbestos develop mesothelioma

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

32/Using the NCI collection of mesothelioma samples from patients surgeries/biopsies he detected SV-40 in 60% of samples. Moreover he found the virus was active and producing proteins offering hope of a future antiviral treatment for such patients

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

33/Carbone was soon to become a mortal enemy of the Vaccine establishment in NIH, and doomed to suffer the same fate as Eddy 30 years before

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

34/Mesothelioma had went from near 0 incidence in 1950’s to several thousand a year in 1990’s. While Asbestos is a known cause of Mesothelioma Asbestos use had been widely used for over a century

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

35/My Uncle died of Mesothelioma and he had been vaccinated early with Salks Vaccine but also had a history of asbestos exposure in the Navy and Electric Power Company.

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

36/I learned there is a very generous Trust Fund for their survivors, funded by Asbestos Companies (not Pharma) which are assigned the sole blame. This proved to be a godsend for my Aunt and Cousins

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

37/Anyways, Carbone was able to publish but his boss forbid him from announcing it or meeting with the media as is the norm when NIH scientist publish an important paper

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

38/Carbone’s collaborator (Pass) at the NCI was shocked. As head of the Thoracic Oncology Dept he thought it was one of the most important lung cancer studies to be published at NCI. He said he didn’t think you could be punished for doing Science

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

39/Carbone was allowed to discuss his findings in Scientific Conferences but he was not well received. Much of health related research is funded by the NIH and it was not a good career move to applaud research results that did not please NIH

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

40/If it was accepted Pharma and USG would be asked to accept liability for thousands of Mesothelioma Cases a year, and research into whatever other cancers it might be causing would be demanded

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

41/In any event, Carbone and Pass soon left NIH realizing they were non-gratis while NIH went on to refute their findings with Fake Studies

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

42/Curiously, when one considers that 100 million Soviet Citizens received a much greater dose of SV-40, Sabins Polio Vaccine might have been the biggest biological weapon release ever unless you consider HIV (Virus in Hep B Vaccine) and COVID (Virus and Vaccine)

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

43/Hilleman/Merck collected blood from gay men + intravenous drug users groups at risk for viral hepatitis. In addition to the sought-after hep B surface proteins, the blood samples likely contained HIV. They devised a multistep process to purify blood. Sound familiar?

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

44/Hep B Vaccine trial were conducted In major cities from 1978-1981 and administered to gay men and intravenous drug http://users.HIV exploded

@petelincoln48 - Pete Lincoln

45/Anyways, I will end this here. Best read The Virus and the Vaccine for more https://t.co/CsQwdSMbl4

MdBreathe
Posted - August 4, 2024 at 4:30 PM
Saved - August 4, 2024 at 9:24 PM

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

Did you know that none of the vaccines on the childhood schedule were tested against an inert saline placebo and none of the trials were long enough to accurately measure harms? @ICANdecide https://t.co/ipyoPWlBn5

toobaffled
Posted - August 5, 2024 at 3:24 AM
Saved - August 5, 2024 at 2:42 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Africans received 50 million smallpox vaccines tainted with AIDS from the W.H.O. “The amount of wickedness that exists among us is unfathomable.” The London Times headlined a worldwide story on May 11, 1987. https://t.co/lS4aMZHug2

FactMissionOrg
Posted - September 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 8:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m urging Dr. Paul Offit to address concerns about the origins of AIDS and the role of vaccines, particularly the B-Vax made from chimpanzee plasma. There are claims that Hilleman, who developed the vaccine, had knowledge of its testing on gay men and resisted using certain vaccines due to safety concerns. Despite my attempts to engage Offit, he has remained silent, even deleting his account when first approached. I believe it's crucial to uncover the truth about these vaccines and their implications on public health.

@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org

Please pressure @DrPaulOffit to respond. He knows about AIDS origin, having written the biography defending Merck vaccine head Hilleman who, in this leaked recording, laughed he "imported AIDS" with vaccines made from HIV+ chimpanzee blood tested on America's gay community. 🧵 https://t.co/9dKxfFax2G

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that vaccines contained 40 different viruses that were being inactivated. The yellow fever vaccine contained leukemia virus due to the crude science of the time. The speaker says they were not reporting AIDS virus at the time, but they had a disease virus. The speaker says it was good science at the time because they didn't worry about these viruses.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are 40 different viruses in these vaccines, anyway, that we were inactivating. And, But you weren't activating the That's correct. No. That's right. But yellow fever vaccine had leukemia virus in it and, you know, this is in the days of very crude science. I didn't know we were reporting AIDS virus at the time. And it was you. We had a disease virus. I know we got. It came with a story. Convertible due to Novavax. It was good science at the time because that was what you did. You didn't worry about these wildfires.

@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org

@DrPaulOffit Yes. We NEED your accurate information, lest misinformation fill the void. Please tell us: Who participated in the trials of B-Vax made from "Dane particle rich" chimpanzee plasma, that you wrote about? Your silence on #ChimpVax is deafening. https://t.co/DjxKXTwoAB https://t.co/SbrWudMnhm

@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org

The CDC first coined "AIDS" in a 9/2/1982 bulletin assuring health professionals that, unlike the "lots used in early studies" on gay men when AIDS first appeared in 1978, Hilleman's LICENSED vaccine used solely human plasma and went through strict inactivation.

@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org

Hilleman is also the one who pushed back against Alfred Prince's call to use NYBC B-Vax in the public taxpayer-funded trials on gay men, worried about the residual chimpanzee-viral material in B-Vax. So, if Hilleman told anybody who B-Vax was tested on, it'd be @DrPaulOffit.

@FactMissionOrg - factmission.org

When I first asked @DrPaulOffit for comment on X, he deleted his account immediately. He's since restored it, but won't comment. That's why he's in this video. Please don't accept "no comment" when asked if #ChimpVax killed tens of millions. https://t.co/IFMMC7kTpV

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

EXCLUSIVE: The WHO has been hiding for decades, the fact that they shipped HIV positive HepB vaccines to Africa that were derived from the blood of chimpanzees. Please follow my friends over at @FactMissionOrg who are exposing the true origins of HIV/AIDS w/ receipts. #chimpvax https://t.co/rxdGYPAHtq

iluminatibot
Posted - September 18, 2024 at 7:42 AM
Saved - September 18, 2024 at 6:27 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

1960s news: Flu vax found to be ineffective. Whistleblowers censored or fired. Military mandated Adenovirus vax which caused cancer in animal tests and took 3 years for it to be pulled from market. https://t.co/o1d3zX26hi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and recommended dosage is ineffective, and in larger doses, harmful, but still recommend it for the old and chronically ill. A senate subcommittee charged the federal government with not informing the public about ineffective vaccines. The division of biologic standards tests vaccines for potency and safety but not effectiveness, which is left to manufacturers. Four scientists found the flu vaccine ineffective and refused to give it to their families; two were transferred, one left, and their findings were not published. The adenovirus vaccine, given to soldiers, contained a contaminant causing cancer in animals, but was taken off the market three years after scientists pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justified using the vaccine, stating it took three years to examine the evidence. For three years, troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine causing cancer in animals. Some division scientists were allegedly prevented from publishing results showing some vaccines to be ineffective. A control officer in 1960 had doubts about the potency of the influenza vaccine, which were made known to the director.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge the flu vaccine and the recommended dosage is ineffective. While in a larger dose, it can be harmful. However, the flu vaccine is still recommended for old people and the Speaker 1: chronically ill. Last month, a senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Ribicoff charged that the federal government wasn't doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Speaker 0: Scientists at the division of biologic standards test vaccines for their potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. 4 scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 19 sixties, found it to be ineffective, said they refused to give it to their own families. 2 were transferred to other work, a third left the division. And over the entire 10 year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists, involves the adenovirus vaccine. A vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. Speaker 2: But the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer. Speaker 0: But that was 3 years after the division's own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took 3 years to examine the evidence against it. Speaker 3: It's more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. Speaker 2: More important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent. Speaker 3: But since the agent couldn't be removed, there was no other course. Speaker 0: Thus, for 3 years, American troops were injected with a cold preventing vaccine which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. Speaker 4: The control officer in, in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels.
liz_churchill10
Posted - December 6, 2024 at 2:52 PM
Saved - December 8, 2024 at 5:40 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Disgusting. The CDC held Secret Meetings about the Rise of Autism From Vaccinations… “So they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days…and there was a 10,000% increase…” https://t.co/XIszNOeDbH

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1989, there was a sudden rise in autoimmune diseases like juvenile diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and obesity. The CDC investigated the hepatitis B vaccine's role in this increase. They found that children vaccinated within the first 30 days had an 1135% increased risk of autoimmune diagnoses compared to those vaccinated later or not at all. Recognizing the significance of this finding, the CDC held an emergency meeting at a remote retreat to discuss the study. The first day focused on the undeniable evidence and potential legal repercussions, while the second day was dedicated to strategies for concealing the information from the public. Excerpts from the meeting were later published, highlighting the tension between acknowledging the findings and the desire to suppress them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, there's a number of things that happened in 1989, but it's the O's disease, all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared. I never knew anybody with juvenile diabetes. When I was a kid, a typical pediatrician would see one case of juvenile diabetes in his career. And a one out of every 3 kids who walks through his office door has it. Something happened. Why isn't anybody talking about this rheumatoid arthritis suddenly exploded, lupus, all these autoimmune diseases, you know, Crohn's disease, these exotic diseases. Nobody ever heard of when I was a kid. Now they're everywhere, and so you have allergic diseases, you have neurological disease, and autoimmune diseases, and obesity suddenly appear around 1989. And, so there's a number of things that could be blamed for it. Well, the CDC thought it it may be the vaccine schedule. Let's check. So they looked at the they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis b vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at kids who had not gotten it in 30 days. In other words, kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups. And among the kids who got it in the 1st 30 days, there was a, I think it was a 10000% increased risk for, for a later subsequent audit odds and diagnosis if you got in the first 30 days. Wow. They immediately knew what was causing it. Oh, I know. It was 11.35, so it's 1135% increased risk. And so they knew immediately, it's called a relative risk of 11.35. If you have a relative risk of 2, causation is presumed. This was 11.35. The link between cigarettes, smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35. So they knew what it was, and then they they had an emergency meeting that they called. They didn't wanna do it on CDC campus because they thought it would be susceptible to freedom of information request. So they they did it in a a very in this remote retreat center called Simpsonwood, which is a Methodist retreat center on the on the wooded banks of the Chattahoochee River, in a remote part of Georgia. And they had all of the big pangiarums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry, from the universities, who are the ones who test the vaccines, from NIH, CDC, FDA, the World Health Organization, the European Medical Agency, and they all got together for 2 days to talk about this study. The first day, they're all and somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me. And I published excerpts from it. For the 1st day, they're all talking about, oh my God, the lawyers are going to come after us. Nobody can deny this. This is bulletproof. You know? There's no way to argue with this. This is real science. We can't you know, what are we gonna do? The second day, they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things. Oh, then, you know, I took a lot of heat at that point, but I, you know,
sayerjigmi
Posted - December 12, 2024 at 11:24 PM
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 11:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the controversial narrative surrounding polio and its supposed disappearance, suggesting it may be linked to reclassification of conditions like Acute Flaccid Paralysis rather than true eradication. I question whether industrial toxins, such as banned pesticides, played a role in paralysis cases. The oral polio vaccine has introduced new issues, including vaccine-derived poliovirus and past contamination concerns. I urge a reevaluation of the narrative, emphasizing the need for transparency and critical thinking about the connections between vaccines, toxins, and health outcomes.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

🚨 The Shocking Truth About Polio and Its Disappearance 🚨 What if everything we thought we knew about polio and vaccines was wrong? Dive into the untold story that challenges the foundations of public health. 🧵👇

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

1/ Where did polio go? 🤔 The "disappearance" of polio coincided with the reclassification of paralytic conditions into new categories like Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). Was this a redefinition, not eradication? View the extensive analysis and evidence by reading: "The "Disappearance" of Polio": https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/disappearance-polio

The "Disappearance" of Polio The polio story is a haunting one: long, complicated, and ugly. It's not a story you will have read or that the medical profession will be able to tell greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

2/ At the same time, DDT☠️ and other toxic pesticides—linked to paralysis—were being banned. Could polio have been a symptom of industrial toxicity rather than just a presumably infectious virus? 🌿 More details at: "Everything You Learned About the Cause of Polio is Wrong" https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong

Everything You Learned About the Cause of Polio is Wrong Everything you have learned about the true causes of polio may be wrong... greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

3/ The oral polio vaccine (OPV), meant to save lives, introduced new epidemics. Vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) is now a leading cause of paralysis worldwide. We replaced one problem with another. 🚨 ‼️Example: The Cutter Incident of 1955 involved a batch of improperly inactivated polio vaccine from Cutter Laboratories, which led to approximately 40,000 cases of vaccine-induced poliomyelitis, causing widespread public concern and scrutiny of vaccine safety protocols. More details: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1383764/ More info on how the original polio vaccines caused polio paralysis: "Polio Vaccines Now The #1 Cause of Polio Paralysis" https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/polio-vaccines-now-1-cause-polio-paralysis

The Cutter Incident: How America's First Polio Vaccine Led to a Growing Vaccine Crisis pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Polio Vaccines Now The #1 Cause of Polio Paralysis While the Polio Global Eradication Initiative (PGEI), founded in 1988, declares itself successful in nearly eradicating wild-type polio in nations like India, vaccine-induced polio paralysis cases far outnumber those the vaccines were intended to prevent. It is believed that vaccines produce at least 300% more cases of polio than those existing in the wild, indicating that a natural problem has been transformed into a manmade one. greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

4/ India’s "polio-free" status hides a dark truth: 491,000 cases of NPAFP (non-polio acute flaccid paralysis) caused by the vaccine. These cases were 2x as deadly as wild polio. 💔 Read "India's Polio-Free Status a Cruel Joke": https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/indias-polio-free-status-cruel-joke

India's Polio-Free Status a Cruel Joke The definition of polio has been changed repeatedly since the programme was launched, thus automatically leading to a drastic fall in the number of cases greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

5/ The connection to HIV/AIDS is chilling. Contaminated polio vaccines, developed using monkey kidneys, may have seeded the zoonotic transfer of HIV into humans. A catastrophic cost for "progress." 🩸 Learn more by reading "What Really Caused The AIDS Epidemic?" https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-really-caused-aids-epidemic

What Really Caused The AIDS Epidemic? Was the AIDS epidemic caused by natural processes? Or, were the experimental oral polio vaccine campaigns conducted between 1957-1960 in Africa on over 1 million inhabitants to blame? greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

6/ Early polio vaccines were also tainted with SV40, a cancer-causing virus. The CDC’s mysterious removal of their webpage linking SV40 to polio vaccines raises red flags. What else are we not being told? 🕵️ Read "CDC 'Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses"https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdc-disappears%E2%80%99-page-linking-polio-vaccines-cancer-causing-viruses1 Learn more about SV-40 on http://GreenMedInfo.com's database on the topic: https://greenmedinfo.com/disease/simian-virus-40-sv40

CDC 'Disappears’ Page Linking Polio Vaccines To Cancer-Causing Viruses The alternative media is justifiably abuzz with a story about the CDC deleting a page on their website admitting that as many as 98 million Americans received polio vaccine contaminated with the cancer-linked monkey virus SV40. greenmedinfo.com
GreenMedInfo | Alternative Medicine | Vitamin Research | Natural The world's most widely referenced, evidence-based, natural health resource with over 10,000 health topics and 95,000 peer reviewed abstracts. greenmedinfo.com
Simian virus 40 (SV40) This topic contains 5 study abstracts on Simian virus 40 (SV40) indicating that the following substances may be helpful: Green Tea, Black Tea, and Catechin greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

7/ Even the so-called eradication of polio may be a statistical mirage. Cases of AFP surged as "polio" diagnoses vanished. Are we being gaslit by reclassification? 🔥 Learn more by reading "The "Disappearance" of Polio" by Dr. Suzanne Humphries : https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/disappearance-polio

The "Disappearance" of Polio The polio story is a haunting one: long, complicated, and ugly. It's not a story you will have read or that the medical profession will be able to tell greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

9/ The narrative of polio’s disappearance isn’t one of triumph—it’s one of complexity, cover-ups, and shifting definitions. Vaccines became a Trojan Horse, spreading new diseases while masking old ones. ⚠️ Learn more by reading: "The Failure of Global Polio Eradication": https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/failure-global-polio-eradicatio

Search greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

10/ Even the Dalai Lama, a global symbol of compassion, has endorsed and personally gave oral polio vaccines to children in India. But would Buddha advocate for medical mandates, or interventions with unintended, adverse effects without properly informing parents? 🧘‍♂️💉 Buddhist principles of non-violence and respect for individual suffering invite us to question coercive, and potentially crippling medical interventions. 🌏 Learn more by reading: "Questioning The Dalai Lama: Who Would The Buddha Vaccinate?" https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/questioning-dalai-lama-who-would-buddha-vaccinate1

Questioning The Dalai Lama: Who Would The Buddha Vaccinate? On Jan. 10th, 2010, the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, administering bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV) to two infants at the Mahabodhi Temple Complex in the Indian state of Bihar, Buddhism's holiest site – the very place where Guatama Buddha was said to have attained enlightenment approximately 2500 years earlier. greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

11/ It’s time to demand answers. How many lives have been altered by misguided campaigns? Why are critical links between toxins/toxicants, vaccines, and health ignored? The truth matters. 💡 Let’s start asking the hard questions. What’s your take? Let’s discuss.👇 #Polio #Vaccines #HealthTruth If you are critical thinker who cares about your health and those of your loved ones, join our free newsletter: Greenmedinfo.com/newsletter and use our free resource enjoyed by millions around the world: http://www.Greenmedinfo.com

GreenMedInfo | Alternative Medicine | Vitamin Research | Natural The world's most widely referenced, evidence-based, natural health resource with over 10,000 health topics and 95,000 peer reviewed abstracts. greenmedinfo.com
toobaffled
Posted - February 22, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 11:50 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Covid mRNA jab causing vaccine-induced AIDS? https://t.co/hYNTPvBMx1

Video Transcript AI Summary
A new Yale Medical School study reveals that individuals experiencing long COVID may actually be suffering from mRNA vaccine injuries, specifically vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDs). The study, led by Bornalli Botticelli, indicates that mRNA injections alter human biology, leading to long-term spike protein production that increases over time. Scientists warn that these vaccines change T-cell immunophenotypes, triggering VAIDs. We were forced to take these experimental vaccines or risk losing our jobs, and we were lied to about their safety and efficacy. The vaccines didn't prevent contraction or transmission of the virus, and they caused heart issues, blood clots, and autoimmune disorders. Now, we're finding out that the mRNA jab causes VAIDs in many people, marking one of the most egregious scandals in American history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bombshell new study from Yale Medical School finds people suffering from long COVID are actually suffering from mRNA vaccine injury. As if that's bad enough, it's worse than that. These people are suffering from what's called vaccine induced AIDS. It's called VAIDs. This is from Slay News. Leading scientists from the world renowned Yale University have confirmed that COVID mRNA vaccines cause vaccine acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, VADES. A bombshell study conducted by researchers at Yale University School of Medicine found that mRNA injections alter human biology to create long term spike protein production that increases over time. The scientists warned that the COVID mRNA vaccines alter T cell immunophenotypes, which triggers VADES. The study was led by Bornalli Botticelli. So not only were we collectively forced to take an experimental vaccine or, what, risk losing our jobs, we were lied to about it. It didn't stop you from contracting or transmitting the virus. It wasn't safe. It caused heart issues and blood clots, autoimmune disorders. We were censored when we questioned the madness, and now we find out that the mRNA jab causes vades in many people? This is one of the most egregious scandals in American history. Cash Patel's first order of business at the FBI should be throwing in prison every single person involved in this crime against humanity.
toobaffled
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 2:42 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Your Government knew the Polio vaccine was tainted with the cancer causing SV40 virus but injected over 30 million Americans with it anyway. 💉 https://t.co/huiEgd1D20

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the Division of Biologic Standards (DBS) at the NIH, scientist Bernice Eddy tested vaccines submitted for approval. She inoculated polio vaccine preparations into hamster cheek pouches, which have low immunity and can grow organisms that other tissues cannot. Tumors developed in the hamsters. These developments revealed the presence of a virus, SV40, the same one discovered by Sweeten Hilleman at Merck. SV40 can cause tumors in hamsters and transform human cells into cancer cells in cell cultures. Millions of people worldwide had already received Salk and Sabin vaccines contaminated with SV40.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There was a woman scientist who was working in what's called the Division of Biologic Standards, which at that time was the unit at the NIH, not at the FDA. They were not at the FDA at that time. This unit was at the NIH and its purpose was to approve or disapprove vaccines for sale in The United States. It was called the DBS, standing for the Division of Biologics Standards. It was run by a man by the name of Roderick Murray. He was actually a South African by birth, a rather conservative figure. And, in one of his labs, this woman scientist whose name hopefully will surface in a minute or two, was in the process of testing vaccines submitted for approval. And in the course of her research, and again I won't go into the technical details, she inoculated some of the vaccine preparations sent for testing and approval into hamster cheek pouches. The hamster has cheek pouches in which it stores its food for later consumption or storage so it packs its cheeks with these food particles. The cheek pouch is a particularly interesting organ because it has very little in the way of immunity. And consequently, it can grow things that ordinarily would not grow in other tissues. And so it's a very useful organ. The lady's name is Bernice Eddy, E D D Y. Bernice who I knew well, at that time inoculated polio preparations into the cheek pouch of hamsters and discovered that tumors were produced, which was quite alarming. Later developments, and these developments occurred rather quickly, showed that there was a virus involved and that the virus was the same one discovered by Sweeten Hilleman at Merck called SV40. And SV40 has the alarming capability not only of producing tumors in the cheek pouch of hamsters, but worst of all, when introduced into cell cultures of human cells, frequently causes them to transform into cell lines or cancer cells. Obviously, obvious, probably the worst calamity you can think of. Furthermore, by this time, in the early sixties, the Salk vaccine had been approved and widely used. Sabin's vaccine, I believe, was just also being used in many countries including The US. And it was easy to learn that several million people worldwide had received those vaccines that contained at no extra cost SV40 virus. A huge worry.
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - May 3, 2025 at 8:03 AM
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 10:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that RFK Jr. has mandated all new vaccines to undergo true inert placebo safety trials, which will expose Big Pharma's inability to conceal vaccine harms. Anthony Fauci previously stated that true placebo trials for vaccines will never happen. I highlighted various vaccine trials where placebos were not true saline but other vaccines or adjuvants, skewing results and misleading safety perceptions. The government has deemed true saline placebo trials unethical, citing concerns over trial integrity and participant experience.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Breaking News!🚨 RFK Jr Orders All New Vaccines To Undergo True Inert Placebo Safety Trials. Big Pharma Will No Longer Be Able To Hide The Harms Of Vaccines. Anthony Fauci Stated Last Year, "We Don't Do True Placebo Trials On Vaccines & We Never Will." 'True Placebo' Is Saline As The Comparative In A Vaccine Control Trial. That's Not What The Gov't Uses. List Of 'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials: Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial...Placebo Was DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines. HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine. Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Prevnar-7 Vaccine. Hepatitis B Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Only Tested For 5 Days. Prevnar-9 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTP-Hib Vaccine. Prevnar-23 Pneumonia Vaccine...Placebo Was Hep A & Hep-B Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine. Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Shingles Vaccine. COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials...Placebo Was Meningitis Vaccine. No true placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are the same. Up until now with the current administration bringing much needed changes... The Government believed, "Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical." The Government believed, "Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical." The Government believed, "Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret." 👇Pediatric Vaccine Clinical Trial Placebos👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831649/ 👇Vaccine Trial Placebo Development👇 https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/science-history/vaccine-science/process-vaccine-development 👇Excipients Used In Vaccines👇 https://www.oregon.gov/pharmacy/Documents/excipient-table-2.pdf Speaker: @BretWeinstein Podcast: @thedarkhorsepod

Video Transcript AI Summary
One way to hide harm in drug testing is to include a dangerous element, like an adjuvant, in both the control and treatment groups. If the adjuvant causes harm, such as death in one in a hundred people, it will affect both groups, masking any increased risk from the treatment itself. Another method involves testing a new treatment against a "placebo" that is actually beneficial. If the treatment appears very effective, the pharmaceutical company may rush to vaccinate the control group, making it impossible to assess the long-term effects of the tested substance since there is no longer a valid comparison group.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have something dangerous and it's in the shots to do some job, like activate your immune system so that it reacts to the the core ingredient of the shot. If it's dangerous, but it's in the control and the shot that's being tested, let's say it kills one in a hundred people. This is an extreme case, but let's just say that the adjuvant were to kill one in a hundred people. Well, if the adjuvant is in both the control and the treatment group, then what the experiment will show is that there was no increased tendency towards death if you got the shot because it was also the harm was also done to the control group. So that is one way of hiding harm. The second way to hide harm is for pharma always tries to hit this target where something that it is testing against a, quote, unquote, placebo, which isn't one, is so good that it becomes immoral not to give it to the control group. Mhmm. And so what they do is they rush to vaccinate the control group, thereby stopping the capacity to see what the long term effect of the thing that you were testing is on that population because you have no one to compare it to. Yep. Right? Because everybody's now had it.
Testing vaccines in pediatric research subjects Past difficulties encountered in pediatric vaccine research have positively influenced the development of modern regulations of human subjects’ research. These regulations permit pediatric research but impose special restrictions on the types of ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Vaccine Science: Process of Vaccine Development Learn about the five different phases of vaccine development, including initial ideas and phases one, two, three and four trials. chop.edu
thehealthb0t
Posted - October 7, 2025 at 7:47 AM
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 5:26 AM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Whistleblower claims that vaccines were used to deliberately spread AIDS in South Africa https://t.co/SPxEe1q6bT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a unit in Saima that went into African countries; "And how was that done exactly?" "Through inoculation. Through vaccines. Vaccines." "Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people." "There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people." "And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And can can can we talk I I just do the question again, and then you can pop in. Oh, yeah. You mentioned actively spreading AIDS? There was a unit in Saima that one of the things was that we went into African countries. And how was that done exactly? Through inoculation. Through vaccines? Yeah. Through vaccines. Vaccines. Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people. There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people. And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries.
VigilantFox
Posted - December 2, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion questions why the hepatitis B vaccine is given to all newborns, arguing it targets adult risk groups but is mandated at birth. It references historical safety concerns, regulatory actions, alleged underreporting of adverse effects, and claims of political and financial motives. The thread cites studies, media segments, and a full report urging ACIP to reassess the newborn mandate and emphasize informed consent.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states. Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life. Why? We finally have some answers. Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question: Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn? The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years. But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird. Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the hepatitis B vaccine agenda and controversy around its use for newborns. Speaker 1 describes an upcoming September meeting where hepatitis B vaccine is on the agenda, predicting an effort to change the birth dose so that children wouldn’t receive it at birth. They say that if a mother has good prenatal care and known hepatitis B status, that may not matter, but if a mother does not attend prenatal care, the child would have only one opportunity to receive the vaccine. Speaker 0 reacts strongly, arguing that the person promoting the vaccine is inappropriately chosen to advocate for it. They state that the vaccine “was made for people who partake in promiscuous sex with multiple partners or share heroin needles,” and disclaim any direct accusation about the person’s needle-sharing, while asserting that this individual fits a certain group. They question why this person should mandate a hepatitis B vaccine for their child, insisting that in the United States people should be allowed to live freely, but not have the government or advocates push a vaccine tied to a particular lifestyle onto a newborn. Speaker 0 contends that the day-one vaccination would not provide long-lasting protection, especially if the person’s argument is framed as addressing a disease tied to sexual activity. They point out that the majority of pregnant individuals in America are not hepatitis B positive (citing a statistic they recall), and ask why their child should receive an injection for a sexually transmitted infection on day one of life. Speaker 0 challenges religious leaders who support the vaccination program, asking what they would say to families who do not plan for their child to engage in the behaviors associated with hepatitis B transmission. They question the alignment with religious beliefs, asking believers of various faiths whether they intend for their child to share heroin needles. They suggest a paradox in relating the injection to the condition of being created in the image and likeness of God, and conclude with a provocative remark about losing sight of religious or moral principles. Throughout, the speakers frame the hepatitis B vaccination strategy as an ideological fight over who should decide what is injected into newborns, juxtaposing public health goals with concerns about personal freedom, lifestyle, and religious beliefs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, look at who they're parading around in the news saying this guy should decide who's injecting what into your body. Speaker 1: Hepatitis B vaccine is on the agenda for the meeting, in September. I predict that what they're going to do is try to change the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine so that kids don't get it when they're born. So if you have a mother who is well connected to care, you know her hepatitis B status, that may not matter very much. But if you have a mother who's not gone to prenatal care, who comes in to deliver, we have one bite at that apple so that child gets that important hepatitis B vaccine. Why does it matter? Speaker 0: I mean, you can't make this stuff up. Right? That's who they decide should go out and sell us on a hepatitis B vaccine. Let's make one thing clear. That is a man who probably needs a hepatitis B vaccine. Okay? That right there, just hold on that image. That is who this vaccine was made for. Full stop. They said it when they were designing it. We need to make a vaccine for people who partake in promiscuous sex with multiple partners or share heroin needles. Okay? Now, I'm not gonna accuse this guy of sharing heroin needles. They don't need to. We can see that he meets, you know, group A. Right? And so, why should this guy demand that my child be given the hepatitis B vaccine, which I hope, you know, look, I have nothing against it. This is The United States Of America. Let your freak flag fly. But you do not get to mandate your freak flag lifestyle on my day one old baby. Come on. Let's just be realistic about this. Alright? I get it. It might seem like the end of the world to you. I don't know why because that vaccine being given on day one will never last long enough to help you in the middle of your sex rave. That's just that's just the the the reality of these products. But my God, if that's the best that they can roll out and this is the is the war, this is the hill they're ready to die on, hepatitis B, every mother's tested for it. We know if you're positive or not, and if you are not positive with hepatitis B, which is I think ninety nine point nine five percent of you, if I remember the stats being correct, that are pregnant in America, then why do I need to inject my child with their first sexually transmitted disease on day one of life? I want to ask every minister and every priest and every religious leader in this nation and around the world that says, you know, that we've gotta support this vaccine program, that this is given to us by God. Really? Whether you're a Muslim, or a Christian, or you're Jewish, or whatever faith it is, do you plan on having your child sharing heroin needles? Is that a part of your religious belief? Do you believe that there's an original sin that God forgot about which is sexually transmitted diseases? And while they take their first gasp of the precious air here on this beautiful planet, right behind that should come an injection with their first sexually transmitted disease. Because this is what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God. Boy, have we lost our way.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Just weeks ago, former CDC director Susan Monarez seemed unable to explain why we vaccinate newborns for hepatitis B. The hepatitis B virus is, after all, a bloodborne pathogen with transmission typically occurring through unprotected sex, blood exchanges like shared needles, and mother-to-child transmission during childbirth. Only one of these risk factors is relevant to a newborn, but expectant mothers are typically screened for hepatitis B during their prenatal care anyway. So why exactly do we give it to newborns? Does anyone know? Are we protecting them for a lifetime of unprotected sex and drugs? Does any protective effect from the vaccine even last that long?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Menares and an interlocutor debate the science behind pediatric COVID vaccination and routine immunizations, focusing on transmission, hospitalization, and risk. - The interlocutor asks whether the COVID vaccine prevents transmission. Speaker 1 answer: the vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are infected, and with reduced viral load, there is reduced transmission. The interlocutor reframes, insisting that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and notes decreasing effectiveness over time, citing Omicron data showing around 16% reduction when there is a reduction. - On hospitalization for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 asserts the vaccine does not reduce hospitalization for 18-year-olds; statistics are inconclusive due to small numbers of hospitalizations in that age group (approximately 76 million people aged 18 in the country, with 183 deaths and a few thousand hospitalizations in 2020–2021; numbers have since dropped). The argument emphasizes a need to discuss the issue. - On death for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 says the vaccine does not reduce the death rate; claims there is no statistical evidence that it reduces deaths. Speaker 1 responds with a more cautious stance: “It can,” but Speaker 0 counters, calling that an insufficient answer. - The discussion references the vaccine approval process and ongoing debates in vaccine committees. The interlocutor states that when the vaccine was approved for six months and older, the discussion acknowledged no proof of reduction in hospitalization or death. The argument asserts that the justification for vaccination is based on antibody generation rather than clear hospitalization/death data. The interlocutor contends that immunology measurements (antibody production) do not necessarily justify vaccination frequency. - The core debate centers on what the science supports for vaccinating six-month-olds and the benefits versus risks. The interlocutor argues there is no hospitalization or death benefit for vaccination in this age group, and notes a known risk of myocarditis in younger populations, estimated somewhere between six and ten per ten thousand, which the interlocutor claims is greater than the risk of hospitalization or death being measurable. - The exchange then shifts to changing the childhood vaccine schedule, particularly the hepatitis B vaccine given to newborns when the mother is not hepatitis B positive. The interlocutor asks for the medical or scientific reason to give a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn with an uninfected mother, arguing that the discussion should focus on whether to change the schedule rather than declaring all vaccines as good or bad. - Speaker 1 says they agreed with considering the science and would not pre-commit to approving all ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0 disagrees, asserting their position that the debate should center on the medical rationale for these specific vaccines and schedules, not on a blanket endorsement of vaccines. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes examining the medical reasons and evidence for specific vaccines and schedules, rather than broad generalizations about vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Menares, I agree with you completely that we need to restore trust in public health. But in order to do so, we have to have a discussion about the actual science, and we can't have a discussion of this, you know, is about all vaccines are good, all vaccines are bad. This is about specific vaccines. It's about specific age groups. It's about specific policies. Does the COVID vaccine prevent transmission? Speaker 1: The COVID vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are Speaker 0: Does it prevent transmission? Speaker 1: When you have reduced viral load, you will have reduced transmission. Speaker 0: But in other words, it doesn't prevent transmission. You can still transmit the virus if you've had the vaccine. In fact, there's been reduced ability to interfere with transmission over time. And what we've found is the most recent one since Omicron is down around 16% reduction if there is a reduction. Does the COVID vaccine reduce hospitalization for children 18? Speaker 1: It can. Speaker 0: It doesn't. The statistics are inconclusive, and the reason you can't prove that it does is there's so few people 18 that go to the hospital. The the numbers are extraordinarily small. There's like seventy six million kids 18 in our country, a hundred and eighty three died, and a few thousand went to the hospital in 2020 and 2021. And since then, the numbers have dropped precipitously, and the idea and the issue needs to be discussed. But the COVID vaccine is not reducing hospitalization. It's not statistically significant. Does the COVID vaccine reduce the rate of death for children 18? Speaker 1: It can. Speaker 0: Once again, it can. That's a ridiculous answer. No. It doesn't. And there is no statistical evidence that it does reduce the death rate. These are statistics. We've looked at it. When they approved it, they had this discussion at the vaccine committee that we've been talking about. During the discussion, they acknowledged that there was no proof of reduction in hospitalization or in death. So what they did is they said, what can we use to try to make people take this vaccine? They came up with this. They said that if we give you a COVID vaccine, you make antibodies. So really the a whole recommendation for having a COVID vaccine from six months up is not based on hospitalization data, not based on deaths. It's based on whether you make antibodies or not. And what people fail to see from this is I can inject you with a foreign protein every week and measure antibodies. You'll make antibodies every time. It just means immunology work has nothing to do with whether you should get a vaccine every week. So when we're discussing the science here, we have to discuss what is the science in favor of giving a vaccine to a six month old, and what are the benefits from that? And there is no benefit of hospitalization or death. And then what would the risks of the vaccine be? We have large population studies of the risks of the vaccine in younger people. And it turns out that you don't see this as much if you look at the general population. But once you start isolating in by age group, which you have to do in COVID because there's such a disparity among age group, you find that there is a risk of myocarditis, a significant event. It's somewhere between six and eight and ten thousand, but that's much greater than the risk of hospitalization or death, which are not even measurable because they're so small. So you resisted firing people who have this idea that the COVID vaccine should be at six months. That's what this is about. You didn't resist firing the beautiful the perfect beautiful scientists that are career people and unobjective and unbiased. You wouldn't fire the people who are saying that we have to vaccinate our kids at six months of age. That's who you refuse to fire. Speaker 1: So, that assertion, is not, commensurate with the experience that I had with the individuals who are identified to be fined. Speaker 0: Did any of the people you refused to fire any of the people you refused to believe that we should change the vaccine schedule and no longer force six month old kids to take it? Every one of them was adamant we should keep it at six months. Everybody's alarmed. We're gonna change the childhood routine. Well, we should. There is no medical reason. What is the medical reason to give a hepatitis b vaccine to a newborn whose mom has no hepatitis? Speaker 1: So none of the discussion points that you just brought up were ever Speaker 0: That's changing the childhood schedule. Check do your child were Regular order. Regular order. Your time. You have your time, Bernie. I got mine. Look, this is the debate over changing the childhood schedule. The hepatitis b vaccine on the schedule is given to newborns. What is the medical scientific reason and proof for giving a newborn a hepatitis b vaccine if the mom is hep b negative? Speaker 1: I wanna go back to the assertion association. Speaker 0: What is the medical reason for giving a hepatitis b vaccine to a newborn? See, everybody's like blithely going along, we can't change the childhood. You're somehow terrible if you wanna change the childhood. We should be discussing what is the childhood vaccine schedule, and you should be the burden should be on you. You wanna make all the kids take this? The burden is upon you and the people you wouldn't fire to prove to us that we need to give our six month old a COVID vaccine and that we need to give our one day old a hepatitis b vaccine. That's what the debate ought to be about, not whether all vaccines are good or whether we live in a house in one land. Speaker 1: I actually agree with you, and I was open to the science. I just would not pre commit to approving all the ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0: Untrue.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The many concerns surrounding giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns are not unfounded. The concern is not simply a matter of being anti-vax. And concern about this vaccine certainly isn’t anti-science. Let’s take a look at the science. The vaccine was first introduced in the 1980s. And early warnings came fast. Respected vaccine researcher Bohn Dunbar exposed the pattern of autoimmune complications after her own brother was injured by the hepatitis vaccine in 1994. A 1998 article in the journal Science highlighted the growing concerns surrounding the vaccine, including the fact that attorneys representing more than 15,000 people sued France’s government for downplaying the risks and exaggerating its benefits. France then suspended hepatitis B vaccination in schools.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A 1999 Congressional hearing laid it out: • Numerous severe adverse reactions including death, seizures, autism, dysautonomia, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and liver cancer. • Adverse reaction reports were ignored or dismissed, and short trial durations missed delayed reactions. • Parents were not informed of the risks, newborns were vaccinated without parental consent, and parents were threatened with intervention from social services. • Vaccinating low-risk newborns for an adult-associated disease is just plain inappropriate. • The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was denying most claims. That same year, fewer than 100 U.S. children under age 2 got hepatitis B. The math doesn’t add up. It never has.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Also in 1999, back when it was actually possible to find a little truth about Big Pharma on TV, ABC News aired an entire program addressing the hepatitis B vaccine. They even included vaccine-injured patients and parents of severely injured children.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The program examines a heated controversy surrounding the hepatitis B vaccine, which is required for schoolchildren in many states and is administered routinely to millions of babies each year. Proponents describe vaccines as highly effective and safe, while opponents argue that the vaccine can trigger serious and mysterious illnesses or death in certain individuals. The report notes that hepatitis B is transmitted through infected blood or bodily fluids (similar to AIDS) and can be passed from infected mothers to their children. It is described as a life-threatening, potentially fatal disease of the liver, with four to five thousand Americans dying annually and worldwide about 200 million chronically infected. In the United States, more than 200,000 new cases occur yearly. Initially, the CDC adopted a broad vaccination policy, starting with health care workers at risk, but soon expanded to newborns nationwide despite the relatively small risk of infection in young children. The stated public health rationale was to prevent infection in the 20,000 children per year who might become infected in the first five years of life, in addition to the 6,000–7,000 infants infected at birth. However, from near the outset, some individuals reported serious adverse events after vaccination. Anecdotal reports include a Navy flight surgeon, Doctor Deborah Eggles, who describes abnormal brain scans, spinal fluid, and blood tests following vaccination, as well as a spectrum of severe symptoms reported by several other patients. Some families have filed lawsuits against vaccine makers and received settlements, though manufacturers argue there is no proven link between the vaccine and these illnesses. Federal package inserts acknowledge rare but serious adverse experiences after vaccination, including multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and lupus. Medical experts featured present divergent views. Doctor Harold Margolis of the CDC explains the argument for vaccination, citing the risk of hepatitis B infection without vaccination and the need to prevent disease, even if adverse events occur in a small minority. Academic and industry voices, including Doctor Bonnie Dunbar and Doctor Robert Schirar of Merck, acknowledge that some individuals may have adverse reactions but maintain that vaccines are highly effective and safe, and that many people are better off vaccinated than exposed to the natural disease. The film highlights cases where the vaccine is suspected to have caused severe outcomes. Ronnie Allen, once a healthy preschooler, developed a life-threatening arthritis after the hepatitis B shot and underwent chemotherapy multiple times; his doctor suspects a vaccine trigger. Other cases cited include three-day-old Ben Converse with seizures, Nikki Sexton who died of heart failure three days after vaccination, and Lila Belkin who died shortly after receiving a first shot. Pathologists and families suggest vaccine links in these deaths, though statistical analyses indicate such newborn fatalities are extremely rare among millions vaccinated since 1991. The program also covers policy and civil liberty questions: should vaccination be mandatory for school attendance, or should parents have the right to exemptions? Some families, like the Saturns of Wyoming, faced expulsion from school after refusing the shot, illustrating the tension between public health policy and parental rights. Public opinion in the piece leans toward parental choice, with calls to place decision-making back in the hands of families rather than authorities. The narrative ends with ongoing uncertainty about long-term outcomes and the possible consequences of airing such controversy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important medical controversy, serious new questions about a vaccine most schoolchildren are forced to get. One given every year to millions of babies. Speaker 1: We just thought it was like all the immunization shots. We were doing it to protect our child. Speaker 0: It's the hepatitis B vaccine. These parents thought it would protect their child. No one told them there might be risks. Speaker 2: I wish we'd known that before receiving the vaccine. Speaker 0: An effective weapon against a life threatening illness. Speaker 3: Vaccines are highly effective, and I think that vaccines are very safe. Speaker 0: But these people claim it backfired. Speaker 4: Within three weeks of the Speaker 5: third shot, I lost my vision. Speaker 0: Is it smart preventative medicine or an unnecessary risk? Sylvia Chase asks, when it comes to hepatitis B, who's calling the shots? Tonight, Friday, 01/22/1999, after this brief message. '20 twenty Friday continues. Now Hugh Downs. Speaker 6: Now a medical controversy that's pitting some parents against the law and leaving others searching for answers of what to do for their children. It's a dispute over a vaccine that is required for school aged children in 36 states that many well respected health organizations say is safe and effective, and yet some people believe it can be the cause of severe and mystifying illness, even death. And as Sylvia Chase explains, this fierce debate has some parents defying the law to prevent their children from being vaccinated. Speaker 4: Two years ago, Ronnie Allen was the all American boy. Speaker 2: He was Speaker 1: a vibrant, healthy picture of health child, very happy, big and strong. Speaker 4: And about to start preschool in suburban St. Louis. First though, he was required to have a vaccination against hepatitis B. Speaker 1: We just thought it was like all the immunization shots. We were doing it to protect our child. Did you Speaker 4: have any doubts about giving him the shot Speaker 1: at first? I questioned why a four year old boy would need a hepatitis B shot. He was certainly at no risk or was not exposed. He Speaker 4: got the shot the day before Halloween. Speaker 7: Happy Halloween! Speaker 4: And he nearly didn't make it to Christmas. He was diagnosed with a rare and life threatening form of arthritis. He's had chemotherapy 10 times. Ronnie is in constant pain. What made you sick, do you know? Speaker 7: Mostly the shot. What shot? The hepatitis shot. Speaker 4: Ronnie's doctor thinks the vaccination could have triggered his illness. And some scientists believe that in certain people, the vaccine can be worse than the disease. Yet it's the law in most states that children cannot attend school without first having the three dose vaccination, which prevents hepatitis b, a disease caused by exposure to infected blood or bodily fluids. Like AIDS, it is spread through sex with infected partners, needle sharing among infected drug users, and it may be passed by infected mothers to their children. Speaker 8: It is a silent infection that causes a silent disease. Speaker 4: Doctor Harold Margolis, Director of Infectious Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control. He says infected people may be symptom free for years as the hepatitis b virus assaults the liver, a vital organ whose failure is fatal. Four to five thousand Americans die annually from hepatitis b. Worldwide, two hundred million are chronically infected with hepatitis b. And in The United States alone, there are more than two hundred thousand new cases yearly. Speaker 8: The only way that we know to prevent it is to have widespread vaccination. Speaker 4: When a vaccine was introduced in 1986, it was seen as a medical miracle. Hepatitis b like polio and smallpox could be wiped out. The CDC adopted a broad vaccination policy, first inoculating health care workers at risk from exposure to infected blood. But almost from the beginning, some people reported serious complaints. Within three weeks of the Speaker 5: third shot, I lost my vision. Speaker 4: Doctor. Deborah Eggles was a Navy flight surgeon, one of the first vaccinated. Speaker 5: Every time they test me, it's abnormal. My brain scan is abnormal. My spinal fluid is abnormal. My blood is abnormal. My physical examination is abnormal. Speaker 4: These medical workers say they were healthy. Then they were vaccinated. Speaker 9: Within two months, I was very ill. I was in ill in bed. Speaker 10: Most of us have pretty much the same type of symptoms. We have joint pain, muscle pain, muscle fatigue. Speaker 3: I can't feed myself. I can't bathe myself. Speaker 4: Many here have filed lawsuits against the vaccine makers and received settlements from them. Although the manufacturers don't believe there is a link between the vaccine and these illnesses, package inserts now alert doctors that serious adverse experiences have been reported after vaccination, including multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain Barre syndrome, and lupus. Speaker 11: Everything that was happening to me was listed on that insert as a very rare incident, but it all fit. These people were completely healthy. Speaker 4: Doctor. Bonnie Dunbar, a cellular biologist at Baylor College of Medicine, believes that in certain people, a genetic component sets off an explosive chain of events. Speaker 9: The only thing that happened is they took this vaccine, and within a month, most of these people have had completely debilitating, lifestyle changes. Speaker 4: But the CDC believed there was no proof the problems were caused by the vaccine and the benefits outweighed the risks. So the agency next endorsed mandatory vaccination of newborns, even though the risk of hepatitis B infection is small in children. Speaker 8: There are about six to seven thousand children who were being infected from their mother at birth and about another twenty thousand children who were being infected in the first five years of lives. Speaker 4: How did this other twenty thousand get hepatitis B? Speaker 8: Someone else in their family through close interpersonal contact. Speaker 4: But in other words, you're saying that because you couldn't reach the twenty six thousand children a year who you believe are getting hepatitis B either from their mothers or from their families, you decided to vaccinate all the children in The United States? Speaker 8: That's correct. And in fact, that is well a accepted public health approach and policy. Speaker 4: But the approach and policy to vaccinate so many children also led to increased reports of adverse events in children. Three day old Ben Converse's seizures began less than twenty four hours after his first shot. Now two years old, Ben is developmentally disabled. Thirty three hours after his vaccination, 13 old Nikki Sexton's heart stopped. The coroner said it was sudden infant death or SIDS, a broad category often used when a healthy baby dies. But a pathologist hired by the Sexton family concluded that Nikki Sexton's heart failure was brought on by the vaccine. Speaker 12: She was an incredibly healthy baby. Speaker 4: Lila Belkin's death was also attributed to SIDS. She had received a first shot at six days old, a second one a month later. She was at virtually no risk for the disease as her parents later learned. Speaker 2: How is a baby possibly gonna get hepatitis b? It's ridiculous to give this vaccine to a child. I wish we'd known that before receiving the the vaccine. No one told us. Speaker 4: You did what the doctor told you to do? Speaker 12: I did what the doctor told me to do. Yeah. Of course. Speaker 4: And they didn't say that there were any reported cases of deaths or serious reactions? No. Nothing. On 09/16/1998, missus Belkin nursed Lila at 05:30AM. Not long after, she found her daughter pale and cold. Speaker 12: She she died early in the morning, about sixteen hours after after the vaccination. Speaker 4: An analysis of federal vaccine statistics shows that such newborn deaths are barely measurable when compared with the millions of babies vaccinated since the mandatory shot policy took effect in 1991. It's a fraction of a fraction even when it comes to serious injuries, lending support to the vaccine proponent's position that the shots do not cause harm. Speaker 3: These are very rare events. Speaker 4: Doctor Robert Schirar, a vaccine manufacturer Merck and Company, estimates that perhaps twenty million children and adults have been vaccinated safely. Speaker 3: I know that people have developed serious illness following the administration of vaccine, but I don't truly believe that those illnesses were caused by the vaccine. Speaker 4: Is there a legitimate position to be taken here that some small percentage will have bad outcomes, but it is worth it? We need to wipe out this disease. Speaker 3: Some people who get vaccinated will develop certain adverse reactions or certain conditions that may or may not be related to the vaccine. I do think that vaccines are highly effective, and I think that vaccines are very safe. And there's no doubt in my mind that that, people are much better off taking the vaccine than they are being exposed to the natural disease process. Speaker 4: But when it comes to children taking the vaccine, there's no choice. They can't go to school without it. That's the law in '36 states. Speaker 7: The decision ultimately needs to be in the parents' hands. The parents are gonna be the ones living with the consequences. Speaker 4: Sue Blevins, director of the Institute for Health Freedom, a nonprofit organization that advocates patients' rights. Speaker 7: I don't think the government has a role to come in and mandate for children that are clearly not at risk that they need to receive a hepatitis b vaccine. Speaker 4: But parents who have made a stand against the government have paid a price. The Saturn family of Hewlett, Wyoming opposed the shots on both religious and medical grounds. Speaker 9: I do not want to be in the generation of parents who gives up the right to choose what goes into my child's body. Speaker 4: But the school board refused their request for an exemption, and this fall, Alex was kicked out of seventh grade. Speaker 13: I miss that I don't get to Speaker 1: play football and basketball and that kind of stuff. Speaker 4: There have been reports around the country of other children expelled from school when parents refused the hepatitis shot. Speaker 13: I think it's pretty stupid not to let me in school if I don't get the shot. Speaker 4: Palm Beach seventh grader Joshua Say was expelled for failing to have his shots. His mother was worried about possible side effects. Speaker 14: The more investigation that I do about the vaccine, I am even more convinced that I don't want him to have it. Speaker 4: As for Ronnie Allen, it's still touch and go. His arthritis stabilized enough to permit him to start kindergarten in September. But as long as he lives, he'll need medication. Can they assure you that the deterioration has stopped? There are no assurances. They don't Speaker 1: know what's gonna happen. They've told Speaker 9: us that. We know that. Speaker 4: And does Ronnie know Speaker 1: that? No. Speaker 4: Are you fearful of the consequences of 2020 airing this controversy? Speaker 3: Yes. I am, Sylvia. And I'll tell you why. I I think that some people would probably not get vaccinated against hepatitis b. And I do think that's unfortunate because I think most people one time another are at risk of getting the disease. Speaker 6: You know, make it the parents' decision instead of someone else telling you you have to do it. Speaker 4: Ronnie's dad thinks it should be up to families. Speaker 6: If they don't feel that it's necessary, let them make the choice and say, no.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The untold history of the hepatitis B vaccine is jaw-dropping. From contaminated trials to secret CDC rationales—it’s all here in @MidwesternDoc's full report: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The science is and has been stacked against this vaccine. Studies showed hepatitis B vaccination increased the risk of MS, lupus, arthritis, and other autoimmune conditions. In France, cases of MS spiked 65% after a national campaign. A CDC dataset showed a 12X higher autism risk when given in the first 30 days of life!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Why does the hepatitis B vaccine cause so much damage? Autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccine are likely due to its antigen having a significant overlap with human myelin. The molecular mimicry of the vaccine was denied because it couldn’t be proven. A 1994 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report noted that, although preliminary data existed for many of the reactions attributed to the hepatitis B vaccine, no further research had been conducted. Wow, thanks IOM.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The trials were a joke. They monitored “side effects” for a mere 4–5 days. And the placebos they used? No, not saline—they were other vaccines or even aluminum adjuvants! Are you kidding me?? Serious reactions—sometimes fatal—were reclassified as SIDS or coincidence.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If transmission is typically due to adult risk factors, why not give it only to adults at risk? Healthcare workers, IV drug users, and gay men with multiple partners… Studies have shown that it can dramatically reduce cases in these groups. Why infants? There is virtually no risk, and immunity does, in fact, wane. So what is the point?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The CDC’s main argument is prevention of mother-to-child transmission. But nearly all U.S. expectant mothers are screened for hepatitis B during pregnancy. And infection rates are under 0.5%! By the numbers, millions of babies must be vaccinated to prevent a single severe outcome. And that’s not an exaggeration. And if mom’s status is unknown, it’s actually mandated in many states to screen newborns for hepatitis B anyway.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So why the universal newborn mandate? A former ACIP insider revealed the dark truth: It’s not about maternal transmission. It’s about capturing a “captive audience” in the hospital—before at-risk youth slip through the cracks later in life. So, because the CDC was failing to reach inner-city teens, they decided to vaccinate every baby in America. It was never, ever medically justified—it was bureaucratic convenience disguised as science. Let that sink in.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B vaccine’s dark history will leave you speechless. Were you vaccinated for hep B? What about your children? @MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The history is disturbing. The first hepatitis B vaccines were plasma-derived—actually using infected human blood. It even involved chimpanzee-human blood exchanges. This was during the early AIDS crisis in New York, San Francisco, and LA. Remember: HIV is considered to have come from a chimpanzee virus. Sounds risky. Merck then rushed out the first recombinant GMO vaccine in 1986.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes the plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine as derived from “the most dangerous starting material” and asserts the starting material was blood heavily contaminated with HIV, collected from New York heroin users during what is recognized as the world’s first AIDS outbreak. He notes the vaccine’s development began with funds from Doctor Fauci’s agency, in collaboration with Tuskegee researchers, to cross-connect arteries of tranquillised chimpanzees and comatose humans, with mixed raw blood flowing between groups of chimps and humans to train the chimps’ immune systems on human hepatitis virus. The vaccine inventors warned it might work the other way as well and claims several chimpanzees tested positive for ancestors to HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, the deadly combination behind AIDS; this serial passage between species is called gain of function. He concludes this created the safest vaccine we’ve ever used. Speaker 1 adds a claim about a hidden starting point: the blood used was heavily contaminated with HIV from New York heroin users, and that the vaccine’s development involved financing from Fauci’s agency and collaboration with Tuskegee researchers to cross-link chimpanzee and human circulatory systems. He states that the serial passage of viruses between species is now called gain of function and asserts this process produced HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, and suggests the vaccine’s safety is paradoxical given these origins. Speaker 2 emphasizes responsibility and risk, noting AIDS’ cause was unknown at the time but fear centered on potential contamination of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS. HIV was “sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud,” though he claims HIV couldn’t survive the treatments given to the vaccine. Speaker 0 transitions to Part II, a deep dive into the vaccine timeline, aiming to quickly reach the AIDS timeline ramifications. Speaker 3 provides a timeline framework: well-documented events through May 1983 to set the stage for two fiercely contested events now resolved by a federal investigation. Speaker 2 lists milestones: - 1950s: The world’s earliest confirmed HIV-positive being is a chimpanzee used to develop hepatitis B vaccines. - 1960s: Chimpanzees and New York heroin users cross-transfuse raw blood to generate chimpanzee antigens to fight human hepatitis. - 1972: Scientists at Doctor Fauci’s agency announce chimpanzee antigens protect humans from hepatitis B; first patent filed for a human vaccine made from chimpanzee antigens. - 1973: The world’s first recognized AIDS outbreak occurs among New York heroin users, the first group injected with chimpanzee plasma. - 1974: Thirteen thousand New York gay men recruited to test the vaccines. - 1975: NYBC and Merck file three patents, citing five vaccine examples all made from pure chimpanzee antigens; a circular extraction method akin to dialysis to extract large amounts of antigens for mass production. - 1978: After years of testing, nationwide placebo-controlled trials begin on gay men with NYBC’s New York trial and CDC trials mainly in California; first HIV-positive blood samples found in gay men, all collected from the cohort, all of the never-before-seen subtype B. - 1979: September—ten months into the trial—the scientist in charge wants to abort due to an unexplainable flare-up in precisely 11 participants who received the vaccine; aborting would harm the vaccine’s reputation. CDC soon reports unexplainable Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in gay men, noting that precisely eleven had the flare-up as of September 1979; by December, 19 cases and the first death, marking the onset of the world's second AIDS outbreak affecting the second group inoculated with chimpanzee plasma-derived vaccines. - 1981: A cancer researcher suggests a new infectious agent with a 50% mortality rate may be causing Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in vaccine trial sites and claims it was transmitted in the vaccine as disease progression occurred quickly in trial participants; trial scientists confirm incubation periods differ and are longer in gay men not in the trial. In the next 15 months, another 593 cases emerge and 41% die. Merck announces Heptavax B, a third US brand for domestic market; original HBVax and NYBC B Vax offered only overseas; a compromise to get FDA approval makes the new version from human blood, but without the circular chimpanzee extraction method it’s “too expensive” for large-scale use. - 1982: CDC names the disease AIDS; CDC asserts the FDA-approved vaccine uses only human blood, distancing it from earlier vaccines; WHO warns AIDS may be caused by a virus in the vaccine’s plasma. - May 1983: French scientists identify the causal virus, enabling testing of archived blood samples; it was a chimpanzee virus, and KS lesions required co-infection with a second virus found in those chimpanzees. This discovery enables verifying the AIDS origin theory: vaccine transmission by comparing HIV rates between men randomly given the hepatitis B vaccine versus a placebo during the trials. Speaker 3 notes two pivotal events in their chimp vax preprint, now settled, and states that in June 1983 two Fauci-associated scientists claimed infection rates in the New York trial were similar between vaccine and placebo; internally, they say Fauci’s scientists spread disinformation to defend the chimpanzee vaccine invention. Speaker 2 contends that the CDC claimed no difference in rates in 1984 but that the private study remains unreleased; the analysis implies nearly all HIV infections occurred in vaccinated participants, not placebo, based on limited data and interpretation. The narrative argues the CDC private study would have shown high HIV rates among the vaccine group, but details were obscured. It alleges the CDC’s withheld study used skewed comparisons to mask vaccine-associated HIV transmission. Speaker 3 briefly references Africa’s rollout in 1984, claiming AIDS emerged there a year after a symposium and that FDA officials shifted from chimpanzee vaccines to the human-blood Heptavax, enabling continued overseas sales. It asserts chimpanzee-based vaccines were widely used in poor countries by 1986, with Africa’s initial infections concentrated in newborns and young women; the WHO suppressed findings that HIV spread via medical injections, not needles alone, to protect immunization programs. Retroactive testing allegedly shows HIV was not present in most African countries before vaccination; after vaccination began, infection rates rose in certain regions. The speaker notes a group, ChimpFacts, as a best account of probable HIV origins, but mainstream preprint servers rejected it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And thus we had the so called plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine, a vaccine that was made from no doubt the most dangerous starting material that we ever used. Speaker 1: His book clarifies that the starting material was blood heavily contaminated with HIV, collected from New York heroin users. They were suffering a junky pneumonia at the time, now recognised as the world's first AIDS outbreak. His book left out that this vaccine's development began by using funds from Doctor Fauci's agency, in collaboration with Tuskegee researchers, to cross connect arteries of tranquillised chimpanzees and comatose humans. Mixed raw blood flowed between groups of chimps and humans to train the chimpanzees' immune systems on human hepatitis virus. The vaccine inventors warned it might work the other way as well. Indeed, several of the chimpanzees later tested positive for the closest ancestors to both HIV and Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus, the deadly combination that sparked the AIDS pandemic. This serial passage of viruses between species is now called gain of function. Speaker 0: That I would argue created the safest vaccine we've ever used. Speaker 2: You have the responsibility that you might do harm. This is not something for for the faint hearted. The cause of AIDS wasn't known at the time, but the fear was that perhaps there might be contamination of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS. HIV was was sort Speaker 0: of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. Speaker 2: I separated into part two, a deep dive into science, to focus on this abbreviated vaccine timeline to quickly get to the ramifications of these new findings. The AIDS timeline. Speaker 3: We'll quickly review the well documented and never disputed events through May 1983 to set the stage for our two fiercely contested events, now resolved by the federal investigation. Speaker 2: Nineteen fifties. Speaker 1: The world's earliest confirmed HIV positive being is a chimpanzee used to develop hepatitis b vaccines. Speaker 2: Nineteen sixties. Speaker 1: Chimpanzees and New York heroin users are cross transfused with each other's raw blood to generate chimpanzee antigens to fight human hepatitis. Speaker 2: 1972. Speaker 1: Scientists at doctor Fauci's agency announced chimpanzee antigens protect humans from hepatitis b. The first patent is filed for a human vaccine made from chimpanzee antigens. Speaker 2: 1973. Speaker 1: The world's first recognized AIDS outbreak occurs among New York heroin users, the first group injected with chimpanzee plasma. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy four. Speaker 1: Thirteen thousand. New York gay men are being recruited to test the vaccines. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy five. Speaker 1: NYBC and Merck filed three patents, citing five vaccine examples all made from pure chimpanzee antigens. They patent a circular extraction method similar to dialysis to extract large amounts of antigens from chimpanzees for affordable mass vaccine production. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy eight. Speaker 1: After years of testing on volunteers, nationwide placebo controlled trials begin on gay men with NYBC's New York trial and the CDC trials mainly in California The first HIV positive blood samples are found in gay men, All were collected from the cohort. All were the never before seen subtype b that sparked the global AIDS pandemic. Speaker 2: 1979. Speaker 1: In September, ten months into the trial, the scientist in charge wants to abort when an unexplainable, quote, flare up appears in precisely 11 participants who received the vaccine. He has warned aborting would irreparably harm the vaccine's reputation. Soon, the CDC will report unexplainable cases of Kaposi's sarcoma in gay men, noting that precisely eleven had experienced the initial flare up as of September 1979. By December, there are nineteen cases and the first death. This is now recognized as the onset of the world's second AIDS outbreak affecting the second group inoculated with chimpanzee plasma derived vaccines. Speaker 2: 1981 Speaker 1: A cancer researcher suggests that a new infectious agent with a fifty percent mortality rate may be causing the Kaposi sarcoma cases at vaccine trial sites He soon claims it was transmitted in the vaccine as rapid disease progression occurred exclusively in vaccine trial participants Trial scientists confirm his key claim reporting the incubation periods are quite different and longer in gay men who had not participated in the vaccine trial. In the next fifteen months, another five ninety three cases will emerge and forty one percent died. The same month Merck announces Heptavax B, a third US brand, this one for the domestic market. The original Merck HB Vax and NYBC B Vax will be offered only in overseas markets. Following compromises to get FDA approval, this new version is made exclusively from human blood. However, without the patented circular chimpanzee extraction method, it is quote too expensive for large scale use anywhere. Speaker 2: 1982. Speaker 1: The CDC names this disease AIDS in a bulletin, assuring the public the new FDA approved vaccine uses only human blood, distancing it from earlier vaccines. The WHO, in the last public mention of chimpanzee based vaccines, warns AIDS may be caused by a virus in the vaccine's plasma. Speaker 2: May 1983. Speaker 1: French scientists identify the causal virus, enabling testing of archived blood samples from trial participants In the end, it was a chimpanzee virus and the Kaposi's sarcoma lesions in early AIDS cases required simultaneous co infection with a second virus also found in those chimpanzees This discovery enables verifying what was at the time the sole and most obvious AIDS origin theory Namely verifying vaccine transmission by comparing HIV rates between men randomly given the hepatitis B vaccine versus a placebo during the clinical trials. Speaker 3: The next two events were the pivotal, fiercely contested claims in our chimp vax preprint, which have now been settled. Speaker 2: June 1983. Speaker 1: The two scientists at doctor Fauci's agency who developed the chimpanzee based vaccine assured world leaders it was a false alarm, claiming infection rates in the New York trial were similar between those who received the vaccine and the placebo. Allegedly in a personal communication from NYBC trial scientist Doctor Stevens Part two covers our numerous exchanges with NYBC scientists of that era following our outreach to Doctor Stevens The fact is doctor Fauci's scientists were spreading the most dangerous disinformation to defend their chimpanzee vaccine invention. All participants with AIDS had received the vaccine. Doctor Stevens later reported that nearly half the participants contracted HIV during the trial, but no one ever claimed similar rates among placebo recipients. Speaker 2: Nineteen eighty four. Speaker 1: The CDC claims rates did not differ in quote, men who did or did not receive hepatitis b vaccine in the vaccine trials conducted by CDC in Denver, Colorado and San Francisco, California. The CDC never released that internal private study. It sounds like they're saying they found rates did not differ in vaccine versus placebo, but the wording is ambiguous. Technically, the hundreds vaccinated before the trial also did not receive vaccine in the trial. So, technically, the CDC could have merely found rates were comparable in those vaccinated before and during the trial. Did the CDC find similar rates but use imprecise wording? Or did the ambiguous wording conceal a significant difference? The investigators went to incredible lengths to retrieve that withheld private study, including summoning data experts and scouring the mountain of physical archives. Nothing. It was wiped. Everyone who would have seen it claims ignorance. But our research concluded that it must have found that all or almost all of the participants who contracted HIV during the trial had received the vaccine We based this on the one and only public study the CDC commissioned to compare HIV rates in vaccine versus placebo years later when a book blamed AIDS on the vaccine. We argued the CDC designed the sole study which the public would see in a way that even if the vaccine transmitted HIV, it would appear to have prevented HIV. The reason is the CDC compared HIV rates in trial participants six years after the trial ended when HIV's sexual spread was at its peak diluting HIV contraction during the trial. However, the study only included participants who contracted hepatitis B during that time Since hepatitis B is up to 100 times more transmissible than HIV unvaccinated gay men almost always contracted it before HIV and would be counted even though they most likely contracted HIV after the trial In contrast, vaccinated participants would only be counted if they had a rare breakthrough hepatitis B infection In other words, the results should have shown much higher HIV rates in the unvaccinated creating the false impression that the vaccine offered protection against HIV However, it didn't work because gay men in the trial only contracted HIV during the trial After the trial, as HIV was spreading like wildfire in the gay community, there was almost no spread among trial participants because they were the lowest risk gay men who had no prior hepatitis exposure Their HIV rates went from zero percent to forty two percent during the trial and then remained steady. Therefore, six years after the trial, of the fourteen oh two trial participants, nearly all of whom were tested for HIV, only fourteen unvaccinated men had contracted HIV, a mere one percent. Since they likely contracted HIV as sexual transmission increased post trial, that means when the CDC made the ambiguous statement implying similar only a few, if any, unvaccinated placebo recipients were likely infected. That was the basis for our claim that the CDC's withheld private study must have shown that nearly all of the six hundred participants who contracted HIV during the trial had received the vaccine. The investigators sent our chart to many scientists including doctor Hadler himself along with our claim that despite effectively counting all HIV in the placebo group versus a portion of HIV in the vaccine group, HIV rates were still precisely dose dependent. Only nine percent in the placebo group climbing to forty two percent in the men who received all three doses. Nobody disputed the numbers. Nobody challenged our interpretation. Notably, nobody is claiming any of the CDC's private studies ever found HIV rates to be similar in vaccine and placebo. Despite the obvious significance, doctor Hadler conceded there was no investigation, and he never compared HIV rates except in this subset heavily skewed to exonerate the vaccine. He referred to San Francisco scientists who still have the full data. As shown in part two, those scientists had been deceived by Merck's manipulative language that led them to believe gay men in the trial had received the same human blood Heptovax as everyone else, not the overseas chimpanzee blood HB vax Unable to explain why only gay men became infected post vaccination, the trial scientists explained the extreme rationalizations they resorted to assuming either the vaccine was so effective that only the vaccinated were sexually active, while placebo recipients were ill with hepatitis, or possibly the vaccine temporarily lowered immune response. However, even if they didn't understand the vaccine's causal role, it was undisputed, and had there been a transparent public discourse, the truth would have come out before the chimpanzee based vaccines were given to millions of people in poor countries. The former head of AIDS epidemiology also wrote, quote, regarding issues such as testing vaccine for HIV, I'm almost certain that was done, and I expect that Merck would have records most relevant to that issue. Yet since the nineteen eighties, Merck has deflected demands for the test results by claiming it was the CDC that tested the vaccine. But the CDC study they cite merely confirmed HIV was inactivated in the new FDA approved human blood version. Speaker 3: Now consider the next two events from our timeline, and remember that before Africa's vaccine rollout began, only a few HIV cases existed in Africa confined to a single region. Speaker 2: 1984. Speaker 1: The vaccine's maker returned to the WHO at a symposium on Africa armed with the misinformation about similar rates in vaccine and placebo and a bulletin from a senior FDA official and former FDA official at Merck. It claimed AIDS was quote never documented to be transmitted by blood and was likely caused by gay party drugs like poppers, making it inevitable that cases of AIDS will occur in vaccine recipients unrelated to the vaccine itself. Later court filings revealed that one year before this FDA bulletin, the agency informed pharma executives that their blood derived products appeared to transmit the virus, but agreed to, quote, keep out of the public eye their continued overseas sales to avoid write off costs. Part two documents that has AIDS began to emerge in Africa one year after this symposium, the same FDA officials replaced references to the old chimpanzee based vaccines with the new FDA approved human blood Heptovax misleading a team of scientists who now hail chimpvax as the explanation for observed phenomena. Thanks to this FDA pharma public private partnership, the manufacturer was able to assert to the WHO that the old vaccines prohibition in Europe and The US was overly cautious and promoted it as a cost effective option for mass vaccination in Africa. He presented the same two lots shown to the WHO in 1977 along with a microscopic image he originally identified as residual viral material from chimpanzee plasma. But he has now adopted Merck's species ambiguous language for those original vaccines, calling it carrier plasma. Speaker 2: 1986. Speaker 1: Chimpanzee based vaccines are now, quote, widely used in poor countries, primarily for pregnant women and newborns. The WHO and CDC report that HIV only recently began spreading beyond its original Congo epicenter because initial infections were concentrated in newborns 12 old and women aged 16 to 29. Half of HIV positive infants had uninfected mothers but only in hospital settings, and half of HIV positive mothers had uninfected husbands. Many studies concurred that HIV's emergence in Africa was through recent medical injections, namely vaccinations. This led to an internal WHO report concluding ten million people were being infected with deadly diseases every year through medical injections causing a baby to die every twenty seconds. However, as the WHO's original vaccine transmission theory was believed ruled out, They assumed HIV spread through dirty needle reuse, expecting single use needles would quietly resolve the issue without alarming the public. Thus, the WHO suppressed their own findings to quote, not jeopardize their immunization program. We can see how well that worked since extensive blood samples had been archived across Sub Saharan Africa to track hepatitis rates pre vaccine. Retroactive testing showed all African countries except these were HIV free when the vaccine arrived. In The Congo, Africa's original epicenter, less than one percent had been infected after a century of alleged HIV spread Here are the rates when chimpanzee based vaccination ended fifteen years later with up to thirty two percent infected in those southern countries that began completely HIV free. Speaker 2: Some time ago, I started a group email with those scientists who sacrificed lucrative careers, some at the WHO and CDC, to raise the alarm about HIV spread in Africa from medical injections. And they were my productive critics, pointing out flaws, forcing me to rethink, do more research, constantly poking holes in my arguments, as you can see. And after many rounds of fixes, one called ChimpFacts, the quote, best account of probable HIV origins. So with that level of expert validation, I figured there'd be no problem getting Chimpfacts out. I mean, at least as an unreviewed preprint. Nope. Mainstream preprint servers still rejected it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

From the start, the hepatitis B vaccine was expensive—about $145 for three doses compared to $2 for other vaccines. Uptake was low among the high-risk groups it was meant for. So regulators shifted strategy: add it to the childhood schedule, where government funding guaranteed sales.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By 1991, ACIP mandated hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns. By 1999, it expanded to all children and adolescents. Parents objected. Pediatricians resisted. Even gay activists called it a failure of public health outreach. But the CDC pressed forward—insisting it was “safe and effective” for day old newborn babies, despite what the science said.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Decades later, the outcome couldn’t be more clear. Acute hepatitis B cases declined—but chronic hepatitis B rates never budged. The very condition the program was supposed to eliminate hasn’t even changed since 1976. Severe injuries from the vaccine, however, skyrocketed. So was it worth it?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For the first time in decades, the ACIP is actually doing its job and reconsidering the hepatitis B newborn mandate. This is our chance to demand change. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This isn’t just about one vaccine. It’s about how “safe and effective” became a slogan. How risk-benefit ratios were buried. How the human cost was swept aside. And how bureaucrats forced a medical intervention on every newborn infant—not for health, but for control and profit.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B saga is a warning. When government health policy is driven by politics and profit instead of evidence, children always become collateral damage. For decades, parents were never told the truth. Now, the cracks are showing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to correct the terrible course we’ve been on. If you care about medical freedom, informed consent, and protecting children, now is the time to act. Read the full report. Spread the word. Contact your Senators. Watch the ACIP hearings. This could be the turning point. For 30 years, America’s newborns were sacrificed to a policy that never made sense. Will the ACIP finally end it?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of?utm_source=publication-search

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/hewugUUbzk

View Full Interactive Feed