Literally anybody can pick a date in the future and see the ISS with their *very own eyes* - clearly definitive evidence weโre standing on a spinning ball.
Imagine believing a balloon could fly 17,500MPH! ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Do they even think?!
Only spaceships go that fast, obviously ๐ https://t.co/sP9edaUcso
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the International Space Station (ISS) and its orbit. They question how the ISS can maintain its speed of 4.7 miles per second without ripping apart. They also mention the lack of documentation and footage of the construction of the ISS. The speakers debate the predictability of the ISS's movement and its relationship to its size and distance. They suggest that electromagnetic tethering and the use of static electricity could explain the ISS's ability to stay afloat. The speakers also mention spiders' ability to use static electricity for travel. They speculate on the nature of satellites and the possibility of manipulating electrostatic mechanics.
Speaker 0: What does a space ranger actually do?
Speaker 1: You guys are talking about how the ISS is floating up there. It's orbiting, and orbiting is to is is is falling.
Speaker 0: That was falling with style. Can you explain to me how they were able to get the International Space Station to go 4.7 miles per second? And if it is within Earth's atmosphere, how it's not ripping itself apart?
Speaker 2: It's observably true that it shows up every 90 minutes. Please tell me, Flurf. How can a balloon traveling in the atmosphere travel at Thousands of miles are out.
Speaker 0: If what I'm seeing is actually not real,
Speaker 3: then what am I looking at?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Why would you question them constructing that in free fall orbit? That's not that big of a stretch. Right? Never been tested.
The transfer of the reference Frame has never been substantiated. We don't even know how that works. I like to think about Hubble because it's like a 20 what is it? A 20 ton, telescope. And they bring that up there and then they construct it in free fall orbit, but they don't document any of it.
There's no footage of them doing it. It's not like it's expensive project, you know, with With a lot of, vested interest for the entire country and the government, NASA, and military. Like, it's not like it's got any of those implications. So you wouldn't want strict strict chain of custody and strict documentation. You wouldn't want to have public records.
You wouldn't wanna maybe just take 1 1 video during the construction, maybe a couple pictures here and there. You know, you wouldn't want you wouldn't want anything like that. Stop asking questions. It's not about you guys. It's not about proving anything to you guys.
It's about brushing our teeth in a in a gravity less area where our hair looks so insanely silly. What matters? What the important part about The important reason that we need to get up there and go into the ISS and spend all this time there is so we can do some theatrics for you. That's the important thing.
Speaker 5: And you can see how fast it goes across because you have a moon video on its, on its page of the ISS crossing the moon in real time, and it's instant. Literally a blink of an eye. Like, it just looks like a piece of dust flying across the screen, but when you slow it down, it's the International Space Station.
Speaker 0: So clearly, something is there. Clearly, it's 400 kilometers in altitude, and clearly, it's traveling 4.7 miles per second.
Speaker 3: It could be traveling that fast. It could also not be. If you're basing all your how fast it's moving off of what they've given you, then, yeah, obviously, it's gonna go back to the dimensions that they give you a globe. Like, yeah, it'll reverse engineer back into that through scale and variance. So how fast something is moving across the sky doesn't tell you anything about how far away it is from you or anything like that.
You have to make assumptions or have to know certain things about, you know, you're I'm using air quotes. You have to know certain about what's moving in the sky to try and draw a relationship between how fast it's moving to the sky relative to you and its actual size. Right? But if you're just going off angular size,
Speaker 4: you would have to take the you would have
Speaker 3: to take their word for it. Right? It is orbital mechanics of the ISS over you know, going around the globe doing its thing and then one over an AE projection. Right? Now when you look at the spiral, you'll see that it, you know, makes a flower of life pattern similar to what you would look at when you look at a magnet under a Ferro cell.
What I think is What I think they probably have done and tether something to to that, to those field lines, and travels along those. I'm not I I know that, that people have seen the ISS. I know you can go to ISS tracker and, Pick a pick a random date in the future, pick a time, and you look up in the sky and it'll it'll it'll generally be there. Jaren's done it a couple of time. Because, like, you know, a lot of people like like, the ISS isn't real or, like, no one's seen it or that kind of stuff.
It's like, well, some people have seen it, like, you know, it does have some sort of predictability to it. Like, the the argue on that, and they and they go to issstractor.com and they try it out for themselves and then they then they see it. Like, they're never gonna believe anything you say Right. So, like, you have to kinda be careful on that. They say they're doing experiments up there.
There's no published papers from them. They just make, like, news press announcements that say they the thing. It's not like I'm just like, we don't really know what's going on or if there's a or if there's even you know you know what I mean? There's a lot of ambiguity there.
Speaker 4: It has a pattern like Alan pointed out and that that pattern actually matches a what what we would call on a flat earth model like a, like a toroidal flow, shape. And I think, personally and I think that some of these satellites, the shapes that they that they would show are, yeah, part of, like, that, a sacred geometry shape that we see. There's actually a flow of of of the stuff that we exist in, and that flow gets greater at higher altitudes. And so if that's the case and if there's less density at higher altitudes, then there's gonna be a greater ether flow. And all you really need to do is come up with a way to keep your craft afloat.
And once your craft is afloat, you can catch the ether winds and just go in in a, like, a spiro graphic type of shape around the world.
Speaker 3: It's like where it is that predictable and Precise. That's where that's where I'm, like, really intrigued with it too because, like, it is that because, like, I'll I'll link You like, I see where you're having a little hang up on the, scale and variance thing. Because once you realize that, it'll blow your mind. Kinda get like, oh, yeah. Makes sense what he's saying.
But, like, in terms of, like, the predictability of it, if it's just over a flat like like, again, if you pull up the ISS orbital pattern over, an AE map, You'll see, like, what it looks like, and then just look at that next to a, a magnetic carousel, like an image of that. You'll see, like, the fractal pattern looks the same. So if you could have technology to tether to something like that. Like, it would you could definitely get in a quote unquote orbit over a plane, you know, that would match Have predictability to it. Practical technology that's applicable.
Like, they've, you know, like, the idea that the the yeah. The idea that something's in, like, Perpetual free fall, but not accelerating, you know, and all this stuff. It's like you know, that requires, like, a whole different level of Glee system, whereas, like, electromagnetic tethering is yeah. You can look up electromagnetic gathering. It's real stuff.
Speaker 6: I'll take this balloon, dump it against my head to generate some static electricity,
Speaker 5: And this small piece of plastic to represent an organism and do the same
Speaker 6: Make that organism fly. Using static electricity.
Speaker 3: That's real practical, applicable, applicable technology and something that's in nature. Spiders utilize it.
Speaker 6: These smart spiders are actually tapping into the Earth's electric fields. There are different levels of electricity in the air. Called ballooning, their spider senses detect the electrical fields. As their silk is negatively charged, it repels negative charges in the air, generating a force Strong enough to launch them skywards. An almost effortless way to travel.
Speaker 5: In fact, their silk super Highway
Speaker 6: is so successful, some tiny travelers have been found an astonishing 1,000 miles out at c and up to two and a half miles high in the air.
Speaker 3: Yeah. There's a huge charge potential in the sky for the gradient of electricity in a uniform linear gradient. Right? Yeah. So we exist within that charge potential and, like, you know, it's like I said, spiders utilize that.
That gradient, you know, provides that static electric, mechanism that you were something was talking about earlier. Yeah. So, like, people think that, like, these fly when they flap their wings. They actually resonant frequency that resist, that resist the wind and ship. So, like, they can they can fly in 20 or 30 per mile hour crosswinds just off of their, Static electric frequency that they generate.
So it's like, you know it's like it's like, are you levitating, or are you flying? Like, who knows? Right?
Speaker 6: Miles per hour. What?
Speaker 3: 30 miles per hour crosswinds, bro, while carrying mad pollen. Like, because you they're not you know, they say, like, they're not aerodynamic and all that kind of stuff. And, like, on top of that, they're carrying it all together, just flapping their little wings. You know?
Speaker 7: When he beats his wings, he starts to resonate this energy, and it goes back and forth just Similar to a guitar strumming on one side of the room and hitting the same chord on the other side of the room or, Somebody hitting a high sea and breaking a crystal. It's the same thing. It's resonance. They resonate. And when they resonate, They eventually reach the resonance of the field around them.
The earth is operating on a frequency of 8.5 hertz per second or so forth. Once this bumblebee hits that resonant frequency of its surroundings, it becomes a free agent. It creates a magnetic bubble around itself, and it can go anywhere it wants.
Speaker 3: Yeah. When you get into the electrostatic mechanics of it and, like, you start to see, like Like, resident frequencies defy so called gravity on, like, a scale that's manipulatable that you can actually interact with, Whereas, like, you can't bend space time. You can't do anything like that, you know, on the on this on any sort of scale. So it's like on the greater scale of, like, what's at the what's at the top of that charge potential where it's highest, like, could you tether some technology to it that, you know, that rides that? Like, who knows, bro?
It it gets really up in the air for speculation. Do they have the technology to, like, you know, to to quote unquote, fake it till you make it, 100%, bro. So, you know, I would, That's that's my take on, like, on, like, what the satellites are and all that. And not everybody can be a robot polisher. They say, like, based on, how the altitude of its orbit, right, and how we can see it through reflections of the sun, basically, right, lighting up the solar panels on the underbelly.
But it maintains a uniform, like, it's not, it's not like a line of sight projection. It has its own light, obviously. Like, which doesn't make any is sense. Like, it it it gets crazy, dude.
