reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @cryptopunkard

DeSantisWarRoom
Posted - October 12, 2023 at 12:53 AM
Saved - October 12, 2023 at 1:19 AM

@DeSantisWarRoom - DeSantis War Room 🐊

NEW: Trump praises Hezbollah, calling the Iran-backed terror group “very smart” hours after they attacked Israel. Disgusting.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two nights ago, I read Biden's security team's concerns about Hezbollah attacking from the north, which they considered a vulnerable spot. I acknowledged that Hezbollah is smart, just like President Xi of China, who controls a vast population with an iron fist. However, the press criticized me for praising President Xi. Anyway, Hezbollah's national defense minister expressed hope that they wouldn't be attacked from the north. But the next morning, they were indeed attacked.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then 2 nights ago, I read all of Biden's security people. Can you imagine? National defense people. And they said, gee, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack from the north because that's civil's vulnerable spot. I said, wait a minute. You know, Hezbollah is very smart. They're all very smart. The press doesn't like when they say, you know, I said that president Xi of China, 1,400,000,000 people, he controls it with an iron fist. I said, he's a very smart man. They killed me the next day. I said he was smart. Whatever I get to say. But, Hesper, they're very smart. And they have a national defense minister or somebody saying, I hope Hezbollah doesn't attack us from the north. So the following morning, they attacked.
cryptopunkard
Posted - August 30, 2023 at 11:17 PM
Saved - September 25, 2024 at 8:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a detailed list of 51 former intelligence officials who signed a letter discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop story, highlighting their current roles. I expressed frustration over their lack of accountability and continued influence. I also discussed ongoing claims of election fraud, citing evidence like duplicate ballots and testimony from experts, while criticizing judges for suppressing this information. Additionally, I called out key figures like John Brennan and Antony Blinken for their alleged roles in election interference and the Ukraine conflict, urging for investigations into their actions.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

A list for the history of the steal. 1 Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN 2 Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit 3 Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary 4 John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC 5 Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University 6 Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank 7 John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University 8 Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University 9 Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems 10 Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico 11 Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism 12 Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director 13 Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director 14 John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff 15 Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group 16 Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC 17 Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff 18 Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel 19 David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager 20 Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis 21 Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer 22 Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer 23 John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer 24 David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer 25 Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard 26 David Buckley, former CIA inspector general 27 Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute 28 Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer 29 James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office 30 David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst 31 Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer 32 Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer 33 Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst 34 Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer 35 Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer 36 Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer 37 Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer 38 Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC 39 Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis 40 Ron Marks, former CIA officer 41 Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum 42 Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico 43 Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer 44 Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director 45 John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer 46 Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs 47 Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues 48 Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director 49 David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman 50 Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies 51 Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

I’m going to just keep dropping stuff here until these 51 spies are indicted.

@alx - ALX 🇺🇸

New #TwitterFiles reveal that Former CIA Agent Nada Bakos, who was one of the 51 former intel officials that signed the letter discrediting the Hunter Biden Laptop as “Russian Disinformation”, secretly worked in policy enforcement at Twitter 1.0

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

If a picture could paint thousands upon thousands of stolen votes. #BellwetherCounties

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

51 Spies who Lied remain unapologetic. From @NYPOST: “Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story” Read the story here: https://nypost.com/2022/03/18/intelligence-experts-refuse-to-apologize-for-smearing-hunter-biden-story/

Spies who lie: 51 ‘intelligence’ experts refuse to apologize for discrediting true Hunter Biden story They are the supposed nonpartisan group of top spies looking out for the best interest of the nation. nypost.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost Election fraud proven. Embarrassed judge won’t allow it into evidence but one of the authors was deemed an expert and testifies next week. Judge is corrupt.

@Rach_IC - Rachel Alexander

The Democrat donating judge in the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman fought tooth and nail to keep the vote spike report out of evidence yesterday, keeping its chief editor John Droz from testifying about it since he wasn't as hands-on as the rest of his PhD team on compiling it. So today, Eastman's attorney has Ray Blehar on the stand, who WAS one of the four PhDs who did the technical work, discussing the report. Touche! (They found 26 large net vote dumps for Biden of 25,000 or more in 14 states suspected of election fraud. Some had more than one spike — Pennsylvania had four spikes. Not a single spike occurred in favor of Trump, the report found. https://election-integrity.info/Vote_Spikes_Report.pdf)

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost One expert did testify today, even though judge won’t allow report into evidence. Another expert testifies next week.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost Tucker says it. BLM-Antifa are the Bolsheviks. You’ll cheer them right up until they kill you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
After reading a biography of Peter Rangel, a leader of revolutionary white forces during the Russian civil war, the speaker draws parallels between pre-revolution Russia and contemporary America. Rangel returned to St. Petersburg after the war to find chaos, with soldiers committing violent acts. He observed the elite, including Romanov family members, expressing solidarity with the Bolsheviks. The speaker equates this to the modern-day, where the middle class ignores a revolution and the ruling class sympathizes with it, likening it to BLM. The speaker asserts that attempts to silence individuals or indoctrinate children are totalitarian measures that dehumanize people. They argue that free citizens have the right to speak their minds, distinguishing them from slaves. The speaker suggests using force against those who attempt to sexualize children, viewing it as a defense of natural law.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But then last year, I read the biography, which I would recommend to everyone in this room of Peter Rangel, who was the leader of the revolutionary white forces during the Russian revolution, the civil war rather that came after the revolution. And he was a Baltic German living in Russia and a general worked for the czar. The war ends or Russia ceases its hostilities with Germany. He comes back to St. Petersburg and the country is in complete chaos. And the Bolsheviks have decided that, it's the, it's discontent within the army that we need to inflame and we need to get the army. I don't know if this sounds familiar to anyone here, but get the guns and the people who wield the guns, we need them. So the first thing to do is destroy all discipline in the czar's army complete. So Peter Rangel has just been on the front for 4 years. He comes back in a St. Petersburg totally civilized city, 2 hour drive from Helsinki. I mean, it is Europe. Okay. Whatever anyone tells you. And he's wandering through, and soldiers are going crazy in the streets. And they're raping women. They're stealing at gunpoint. Soldiers in uniform, in a monarchy, which had not had any behavior like this at all. And he Peter Engel just can't even believe it. These are his soldiers. He's a general. And so he's he's completely freaked out, and he goes into a movie theater, and everyone in the movie theater is completely absorbed in the movie. Like, there's no revolution happening outside. And Peter Rangel thinks these people are insane. So he goes back, he's like, I gotta get to Moscow. So he takes the train to Moscow. I have to tell the czar this country's falling apart. He's very close to the Romanovs, the family. You should read this. It's it's just out in English translation in the last 3 years. It's an unbelievable book, lost to history until recently, 2 English speakers. So he goes back to Moscow and he's close to the Romanovs. And so he goes into the imperial court and he knows all the relatives, there are millions of them hangers on. And he notices about 80% of the women in the Romanov family are wearing red ribbons in solidarity with the Bolsheviks who wound up, of course, we know how it ends, murdering them, murdering them in the basement at dawn. So wait, what Peter Rangel says? How is it that this country is being devoured by a violent revolution, and the people who can afford movie tickets, that is kind of our middle class, are refusing even to acknowledge that it's happening, and the ruling class against whom it is aimed are sympathizing with it. And if this doesn't remind you of BLM, I don't know what does. I'm reading this in my portrait. I mean, I couldn't go to sleep. I was like, wait. I live in that country. That's happening now. This is a revolution. Its aim is to hurt you. Yes. That would include physically in the end. Sorry. If someone tells you you're not allowed to speak, if someone tells you your children are not your children, okay, these are not ideological differences. This is not, oh, I prefer, you know, this capital gains rate. These are totalitarian measures that treat you as nonhuman. Human beings, free citizens get to say what they think. Slaves must be quiet. That's the distinction. So all this like, oh, it's in the first amendment. No. Yeah. It precedes the first amendment. As our founding documents made clear, these are natural rights that distinguish the citizen from the slave, the human from the subhuman. We can't consider slaves fully human or we wouldn't enslave them. So anyone treating you as a slave considers you less than human. People don't pause to consider the implications of this. If someone says to you, I have a right to make your children hate you, or to say weird creepy sex stuff to your kids. What's your what's a valid response to that? Well, in a healthy society, if someone says weird creepy sex stuff to your 8th grader, you get your gun. Like, try that in Bulgaria. How do you think that's gonna work? I mean it too. Oh, you're calling for violence? Yeah. You try and sexualize my children? What? Those are my children. That's totally not allowed. That's not that nothing like that is allowed. And I don't care if you claim you're a teacher or an administrator. You work for some creepy Soros backed NGA. Oh, if you're trying to sexualize my children, I go right to force. And if I can't do that, I'm not really their father, am I? I'm serious. And I don't think there's anything to be ashamed of in that. And, no, I'm not calling for I don't know. I'm I'm I'm calling for applying natural law to American life. And if you refuse to do that, what happens? Well, we're watching what happens. They become increasingly aggressive.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost Evidence of a stolen election

@mad_liberals - Mad Liberals

Here's a few hundred of the thousands of duplicate ballots that were double and triple scanned in Fulton. I'm up to 3,876 confirmed duplicate ballots during the recount.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost More evidence of a stolen election. Those that are still trying to gaslight us claiming the election was legit are liars.

@mad_liberals - Mad Liberals

I want to thank the wonderful DeKalb employees who actually wrote the word 'Recount' on these ballots that they created to make the recount match up their original count. They literally got certain precinct ballots and only filled in the president vote so that their numbers would be correct.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost Admitting his guilt. GITMO

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

A former acting CIA director has admitted to Congress that he organized the letter that falsely portrayed Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation in an effort to influence the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden and that he did so at the direction of current Secretary of State Antony Blinken https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/ex-top-spy-admits-hunter-biden-laptop-letter-designed-influence

Ex-top spy admits Hunter Biden laptop letter designed to influence 2020 election, Blinken involved Extraordinary admission by career intelligence officer Michael J. Morell provides stunning evidence that the now-infamous letter from 51 security officials in October 2021 was not an organic intelligence community event but rather a political dirty trick. justthenews.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost You want some more? Well here’s some more:

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

Election Interference: FBI Director Chris Wray Admits Withholding the Truth About the Hunter Biden Laptop from the American Public Helped Protect Joe Biden During Election Season (VIDEO) via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/election-interference-fbi-director-chris-wray-admits-withholding/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=election-interference-fbi-director-chris-wray-admits-withholding

Election Interference: FBI Director Chris Wray Admits Withholding the Truth About the Hunter Biden Laptop from the American Public Helped Protect Joe Biden During Election Season (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft            In a high-stakes hearing today, FBI Director Christopher Wray faced intense questioning from Senate Judiciary Committee members regarding the potential renewal of key surveillance powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). thegatewaypundit.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost BOOOOOOM! Coup revealed thanks to @laralogan

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

January 6th was an inside job.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan .@RepClayHiggins has exposed the coup. The regime is illegitimate. Anyone defending Biden, the FBI, the Democrats is either uninformed or a traitor. There’s no inbetween. https://rumble.com/v41gb71-rep.-clay-higgins-speaks-out-lara-logan-interviews-higgins-about-jan.-6-in-.html

Rep. Clay Higgins Speaks Out | Lara Logan Interviews Higgins About Jan. 6 In Bombshell Interview Rep. Clay Higgins Speaks Out | Lara Logan Interviews Higgins About Jan. 6 In Bombshell Interview rumble.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins The interview of interviews. This is how investigative journalism is done. @SpeakerJohnson why are you not exposing this? This was a coup. Joe Biden is not the legitimate president. Vacations can wait. You’ve got a country to save.

@RepClayHiggins - Rep. Clay Higgins

Truth…

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Boom! Truly was a Fedsurrection. From a ‘human asset’. Interesting that he’s getting out of front of it because it’s going to be exposed later this year anyway.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Derek Myers, a congressional candidate for Ohio's 2nd district, claims that undercover FBI agents and human assets were present at the January 6th Capitol protest. Myers states he was recruited by the FBI in 2017 as a field operative to infiltrate radicalized organizations, gather intelligence, help plan their activities, and "help radicalize them" to incite violence. Myers says he was deactivated in 2020 but was approached in December 2020 to be reactivated for an assignment in Washington D.C. in January, which he now believes was the January 6th Stop the Steal rally. Myers claims the FBI uses confidential human informants and plainclothes agents to infiltrate protests. He states he has evidence to support his claims, which he is prepared to share, despite the risks. He hopes his disclosure will shed light on the federal government's actions and force them to be honest about January 6th and the use of undercover agents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Derek Myers. I'm running to be your next congressman in Ohio's 2nd congressional district. I'm about to share with you some information that I feel the American people deserves to know. It's not a video that I wanted to make at first. In fact, it's something that I still don't really wanna have to share with you. However, I must say the American people deserve to know the truth and, therefore, I am sharing this video with you. 4 months ago, when I decided to run for this office, I shared this with my campaign manager and our campaign consultants with hopes that they could that it could be part of my platform. I wanted to tell the truth about what January 6th was. I wanted to tell the truth about our federal government. It was strongly advised that I not come public about that because it could hurt my campaign, it could hurt my polling numbers, and may cost me the election. More importantly, my base would possibly be upset with me with the fact that I'm about to share the information with you that I'm about to share. Many people have asked, is January 6th a setup? Were there undercover FBI agents or human assets inside the crowd of protesters at the Capitol on January 6, 2021? And did those FBI agents or undercover human assets work to radicalize other protesters in order in order to storm the Capitol? I can tell you 100% definitively without a doubt that there were indeed undercover human assets and plainclothes FBI agents inside the crowd on January 6, 2021. I know this because I was the member of a program and recruited by the FBI to take part in such events. I was recruited in 2017 to be part of the FBI's program known as confidential human assets or what we call, field operatives. Essentially, as a field operative, it is our job to infiltrate organizations that are radicalized, gather information and intelligence, find out their next moves, take that information to the FBI, then go back to these organizations, help plan out what these organizations are going to do, record that information, attend these events, attend these protests, and help radicalize them, help get their aggression pent up, make them more angry, make them more upset so that a way the aggression would turn, violent as a result of our antagonistic, ways of of angering these people. Now you might wonder why believe me, I mean, after all, this is a guy who's running for office, This is a person who has made national headlines before. When 2020 came around, I was deactivated. I was no longer a member of the program. However, in December of 2020, I was approached by a member of the FBI asking me if I was interested in being reactivated for an assignment in Washington DC that would be taking place in January. I now have since learned that that assignment that was being solicited to me was the Stop the Steal rally or what some is known as the January 6th insurrection. So when the people ask today, were there undercover FBI agents or confidential human assets working on behalf of the FBI inside the rally on Stop the Steal on January 6, 2021? I'm Derek Myers, and I'm here to tell you that 100% truthfully, definitively, yes, that the FBI does indeed use confidential human informants and plain closed FBI agents to infiltrate protesters and that in fact, they were present on January 6th. I have a folder of evidence that I am prepared to share at the risk of going to prison, at the risk of losing my campaign, and at the risk of losing my reputation. However, with these new developments that came to light this week, you were going to find out anyway. I am forced to share this information with you now because I want you to hear it from me. I want you to know the truth from me. I want you to know that what I'm sharing with you is truthful, and I want you to know that it is not to be misconstrued in other ways that you will hear later this year, means that are out of my control. The American people deserve to know the truth about their federal government, about the events that unfolded on January 6th, and they deserve to know the truth about those who are involved. I hope this brings some peace to some people. I hope to shed some light on the federal government, and I hope they are forced out with honesty to tell the truth now about the events that unfolded on January 6th, about the events that are surrounded their secret program, and about the use of human assets, field operatives, and undercover agents to radicalize organizations in order to make them more radicalized and aggressive. Thank you.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Brennan is partly responsible for starting the war in Ukraine.

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

NY Times: CIA Built 12 Secret Spy Bases in Ukraine Waging Shadow War Against Russia Since 2014 – John Brennan Caught in the Middle of It via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/ny-times-cia-built-12-secret-spy-bases/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ny-times-cia-built-12-secret-spy-bases

NY Times: CIA Built 12 Secret Spy Bases in Ukraine Waging Shadow War Against Russia Since 2014 - John Brennan Caught in the Middle of It | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft           On Sunday, The New York Times published a rare US admission that US intelligence has not only been instrumental in Ukraine’s wartime decision-making but has established and financed high-tech command-and-control spy centers and was doing so long prior to the Feb. thegatewaypundit.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Brennan is a scumbag.

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

Did You Know: According to the NY Times, during the Maidan coup, an unmarked US plane carrying the head of the CIA landed in Kiev His role was to fuse the CIA and new Ukraine intel services into a regime to wage shadow war on Russia That man's name? John Brennan

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Still a scumbag.

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BOMBSHELL - CIA Built 12 Secret Spy Bases in Ukraine Before War https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/episode-679-bombshell-cia-built-12-secret-spy-bases/id1585243541?i=1000647150476v

Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec Listen to Human Events with Jack Posobiec's Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec podcast with Jack Posobiec on Apple Podcasts. podcasts.apple.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Arrest John Brennan.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The 2014 CIA-supported overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government. A Ukrainian court recently ruled that the snipers firing on Maidan protestors primarily operated from Hotel Ukraina, a location controlled by U.S.-backed extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the transition of protests into a revolution aimed at toppling the elected government. Their agenda includes changing the president and signing an association agreement to strengthen Ukraine's business environment. They express support for Ukraine, stating, "The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you." They emphasize the importance of signing the association agreement soon and suggest Yatseniuk is the right person due to his economic and governing experience. They commend the Ukrainians for peacefully protesting against tyranny and expect the Ukrainian government to show restraint and avoid violence against peaceful protesters.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government? Speaker 1: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Kynadovich return back to association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you. It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show restraint, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Blinken is a bad hombre.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost Admitting his guilt. GITMO

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson Mapping out the Deep State.

@gc22gc - Grace Chong 🇺🇸

Garrett Ziegler Discusses How He Is Mapping Out The Deep State In The Government @MarcoPolo501c3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Garrett Ziegler of Marco Polo has published three directories of federal officials involved in the Biden investigation to expose what he calls the "unfeeling uni party." These directories aim to provide unprecedented transparency by revealing the public work emails of those involved, excluding private information protected by federal law. Ziegler believes Hunter Biden's upcoming trial on tax charges is "window dressing" and that he should be tried for money laundering, FARA violations, and illegal lobbying. The directories include individuals like Matt Colangelo, who was handpicked by Merrick Garland to work in the DA's office and start the trial. Ziegler hopes that if Trump regains power, these directories will serve as a "dossier" identifying those who should be removed from their positions. He criticizes the lack of whistleblowers in the investigation, noting only one, Gary Shapley, came forward.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Garrett Ziegler, you've published today. Garrett, walk us through what you put up and but I want to take I want you to walk people through your concept of that. I think this is your 3rd volume. So talk about what you're putting out, but also how it dovetails with what else you're doing. Speaker 1: Yeah. So thank you for having me on. I was watching an interview that you did a couple of weeks ago, and you mentioned a great phrase, the unfeeling uni party. And I love that. We are mapping out that unfeeling uni party that does not care about the American public and especially Trump supporters. They truly detest middle America. And so what we've done with these three directories of every single federal official involved in the Biden investigation is provide transparency that they that the public has never had before at this level of detail. For example, in the crossfire hurricane investigation, we heard all of these names and all of these different entities, but I think the epic times was the only entity that tried to at least map out who these people are. And I remember you and I had a discussion a little bit about doxxing. We don't reveal any of their, you know, addresses. Anything that would be protected under federal law is not on these directories, but their public work email is. And so before Hunter goes to trial in June, the American public will know every single federal official who is responsible for this travesty. Because when he goes to trial for those 9 tax charges, that is window dressing. That is what they should hope for. He really should be going on trial for money laundering, FARA violations, illegal lobbying. And so what we have with these directives by the way, I just have one right in front of me, Matt Colangelo, the guy who Merrick Garland picked handpicked to go straight to the DA's office to start this trial next Monday. He was involved in the Biden investigation. And this other guy, Anthony Coley, by the way, there's 59 people on the DOJ list. It's It's all on our website, Marco Polo 501c3. And and as you said, it's the third one. We're doing the US attorney's office for Delaware in a couple of weeks. And so by the time Hunter goes on trial, the public will not be able to say, we don't know who's involved with this. So in an ideal world, if DJT gets back into power and is the 2nd president ever to serve non concurrent terms, we will have a complete dossier on who is involved. And that way, nobody will be able to say we don't know who needs to go. Marco Polo is the group basically saying, we are going to figure out who needs to go. And by the time we get there, we will have a road map of who has to leave. Apart from all the millions of illegals that that I'd be willing to happy to walk across the border back to Mexico. All these feds have to go. The fact that there weren't 15 whistleblower, Steve, involved in this investigation is a travesty. We got one, Gary Shapley.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@nypost @laralogan @RepClayHiggins @SpeakerJohnson DoJ Deep State actors along with office contact emails. https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

While we wait, Bill Barr is on the list. Former Attorney General Bill Barr's father was Donald Barr. Donald Barr was an educator, writer, and former Office of Strategic Services (OSS) officer. He served as an administrator at Columbia University and was the headmaster at the Dalton School in New York City and the Hackley School in Tarrytown, New York. Donald Barr also wrote two science fiction novels. He was born on August 8, 1921, and passed away on February 5, 2004. Donald Barr and his wife, Mary Margaret (née Ahern), had four children, including William P. Barr, who served as the 77th and 85th U.S. Attorney General. Where it gets very interesting, Donald Barr hired Jeffrey Epstein as a teacher at Dalton School. Epstein, who was 21 years old and WITHOUT a college degree at the time, began teaching mathematics and physics at Dalton in the fall of 1974. There is evidence that Jeffrey Epstein's behavior with students at Dalton School was inappropriate. Several former students have come forward to share their recollections of Epstein's time at the school, noting his behavior with teenage girls in particular. These students recall Epstein focusing a lot of his attention on female pupils, making them feel uncomfortable with his persistent attention. Although none of the students interviewed explicitly mentioned any sexual advances, they did report the discomfort they felt due to his conduct. This information was reported by The New York Times and other sources, indicating that Epstein's behavior left a lasting impression on many of his students. Based on the provided information, there is no direct mention of any formal consequences for Jeffrey Epstein's behavior towards staff or students during his time at the Dalton School. However, it is noted that he was dismissed in June 1976 for inadequate development as a teacher, which might be related to his conduct with students, although the specific reasons for his dismissal are not explicitly stated.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

So let's get going on this Deep State drop. Who are the Deep State? How are they connected? While a lot of these operatives you probably do not know, a lot you do know. Everything I am dropping here is done by permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. You can visit the original content by visiting https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3. Some important links: Gary Shapley transcript: waysandmeans.house.gov/wp-content/upl… Joe Ziegler transcript: waysandmeans.house.gov/wp-content/upl… Joe Gordon transcript: oversight.house.gov/wp-content/upl… This took them many many many many hours of research. Please spread this far and wide. Make these people famous because they do not have your best interests at heart. They are Statists who enrich themselves with the gulag management of society.

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Kira Mead Antell Senior Counselor Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA) DOB: 09/22/1975 kira.m.antell@usdoj.gov linkedin.com/in/kira-antell… fb.com/kira.antell Husband: Paul Brian Engelhardt Silver Spring, MD 20902 Antell received multiple emails containing correspondence from Senators and Congressmen who raised concerns about the Hunter Biden "investigation" including, but not limited to, the need for Nick McQuaid to recuse himself from the "investigation" and for a Special Counsel to be appointed. Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

William "Bill" Pelham Barr Attorney General (AG) (Retired) DOB: 05/23/1950 Wife: Christine Mary Moynihan Barr Barr aided the slow-walking of the "investigation" into Hunter Biden; indeed, Barr approved of the job U.S. Attorney David Weiss and others did. Barr admitted this in his memoir: "I was asked, finally, whether I would consider appointing a Special Counsel to handle the reported investigation of Hunter Biden. To the extent there was any pending investigation, I said, I was confident that it was being handled responsibly by the department's lawyers, and I saw no reason to appoint a Special Counsel." Additionally, Barr defied the U.S. Constitution by refusing to discuss the "investigation" into Hunter Biden with then-President Donald J. Trump, even though the Constitution states (Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) that the President, as the Chief Executive of the nation, has a duty to ensure that the laws of the U.S. be faithfully executed. Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Stephen Elliott Boyd Assistant AG (Departed) OLA DOB: 01/21/1979 boyd@horizonsgs.com linkedin.com/in/stephen-e-b… fb.com/stephen.e.boyd instagram.com/stepheneboyd 2nd (current) wife: Brecke Megan Popelka Boyd (née Latham) Ex-wife: Louisa Trussell Boyd Imperiale (née Williams) 2115 Shiver Dr Alexandria, VA 22307 Boyd oversaw the OLA at a time when Senators and Congressmen were repeatedly asking the DOJ and/or its components for more information about material from the Biden Laptop. Boyd either punted on these requests or deemed them to be improper; Boyd also believes that "lawmakers serious about investigating prosecutorial misconduct have other avenues to raise issues regarding whether a case has been handled appropriately — either through the Inspector General of the Department of Justice or the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility." It apparently never occurred to Boyd to state that those lawmakers should simply stop providing funds to those prosecutors engaging in misconduct. Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Aryele Nekole Bradford Senior Communications Advisor Office of Public Affairs (OPA) DOB: 06/09/1989 aryele.bradford@usdoj.gov linkedin.com/in/aryelebradf… fb.com/aryele.bradford Landover, MD 20785 Bradford received the following email on 03/17/2022: "WH Press Sec Psaki was asked today about previous claims from her and the president that Hunter Biden's laptop was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. She [Psaki] directed the questions to the DOJ so I'm just following up to see if anyone here could provide an answer as to whether this admin views the laptop as real in light of the New York Times report this week." Bradford forwarded the email to two colleagues, Wyn Hornbuckle and Dena Iverson, adding that she was "not sure where this one [request for comment] falls." Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Audrey Nicole Brockman Assistant (Departed) Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG) DOB: 05/05/1991 abrockman@paulweiss.com linkedin.com/in/audrey-broc… fb.com/audrey.brockma… Partner: QI An Brockman was asked on 04/21/2022 to review and print so-called "Roundtable Materials" for her then-boss, John Carlin, who was the Principal Associate Deputy AG at the time. These "Roundtable Materials" contained information about the Hunter Biden "investigation." Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Christina Maria Calce Deputy Assistant AG (Departed) OLA DOB: 09/06/1983 christina.calce@mail.house.gov linkedin.com/in/christina-c… instagram.com/christinacalce Husband: Robert "Rob" Christopher Harmala Washington, DC Calce responded "Le sigh" on 03/15/2022 to a colleague, Joe Gaeta, who forwarded an email from a Senate committee staffer who asked: "[W]ill the Department [of Justice] clarify whether it possesses FISA material relating to Patrick Ho, an associate of Hunter Biden? DOJ informed a federal court that it does possess that material but has not said the same to Congress." From August to October 2020, Calce donated more than $75,000 collectively to the DNC, Joe's presidential campaign, and a super PAC supporting Joe. Reprinted with permission from @MarcoPolo501c3. Original content available at https://www.marcopolo501c3.org/p/the-who-of-the-5ws-3

The Who of the "5Ws" - #3 The DOJ is the third of several agency pictorial directories we will publish. marcopolo501c3.org

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

It’s obvious now.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Coup

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Swamp monkeys. https://t.co/leuL5AbXKf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recommends to President Trump that he immediately revoke the security clearances of everyone who participated in an illegal act that was not prosecuted. This includes everyone who signed the 51 intel letter, including three secretaries of defense and CIA and NSA deputies. The speaker claims these individuals rely on security clearances to obtain million-dollar paydays in the defense industrial complex. The speaker asserts that the President of the United States is the sole arbiter of security clearances.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I add a couple of things to that? That I've recommended to president Trump and whether he'll do it or not is up to him, obviously. But immediately, you revoke forever everyone's security clearance. That everyone's security clearance that ever participated in an illegal act that was not prosecuted. Oh, yeah. Everybody that signed the 51 intel letter, I'm talking 3 secretaries of defense and CIA and NSA, deputies, and everybody. Because what the world doesn't understand is those swamp monkeys rely on that security clearance to go out and get their $10,000,000 payday in the defense industrial complex. And do you know who is the sole arbiter of security clearances? The president of the United States. But

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Traitors

@RepTimBurchett - Rep. Tim Burchett

I’m requesting an immediate investigation into @SecBlinken and the 51 intelligence officials for their role in interfering in the 2020 election. We don’t give the intelligence community all these taxpayer dollars for them to undermine our democratic process. https://t.co/bmT1kZ62EE

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Do you still believe that @cnn is a legitimate news service?

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

I know we are talking about Jake Tapper But let's not leave out the fact that Dana Bash's husband was one of the 51 intel officials who lied about the Hunter Biden laptop

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@CNN Told ya

@KingMakerFT - Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)

The letter signed by 51 former intel officials “had all the earmarks of an intelligence community influence operation,” according to this bombshell report. It was reviewed at the highest levels of the CIA and approved for publication in record time. Everyone involved knew it was a political smoke and mirrors game to allow Biden to mislead the voting public. CIA contractors were among the signatories. Everyone who signed it, reviewed it or approved it should lose their security clearance and be debarred from any further contracting work. https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/2024-06-25%20The%20Intelligence%20Community%2051%20-%20How%20CIA%20Contractors%20Colluded%20with%20the%20Biden%20Campaign%20to%20Mislead%20American%20Voters.pdf

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@CNN Ding ding ding 🛎️ Fact check: True

@RobGouveiaEsq - Robert Gouveia Esq.

Some of the "Ex-CIA" officials who rigged the 2020 election with their fake Hunter Biden coverup letter were not "Ex" CIA at all. https://t.co/HYd5yMW5tC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript alleges that 51 former intelligence officials, including active CIA contractors, colluded with the Biden campaign to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation and rig the 2020 election. According to the transcript, Anthony Blinken initiated the effort by contacting Michael Morell, a CIA contractor, to create talking points for Biden. The report claims that CIA officials, including then-Director Gina Haspel, were aware of the statement prior to its publication and that the CIA's internal review board approved it. The transcript asserts that Morell and David Buckley, another signatory, were active CIA contractors at the time, earning taxpayer money while engaging in political activities. The report suggests that the signatories leveraged their intelligence titles to lend legitimacy to their claims. The speaker concludes that the CIA paid, housed, and approved the letter, interfering in the electoral system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Michael Morel. Yes. Oh, why is that right here? That's your name. And it says, yes. You have a contract with the CIA. So David Buckley also, yes, had a contract with the CIA. Shocking because they told us that they didn't work for the CIA. Now the pre publication review board determined that the talking points contained classified information that had to be removed prior to publication. Wow. So the CIA's internal review approved this? Speaker 1: It's all real. Speaker 2: Like a classic Russian playbook disinformation campaign. That assessment by the way is not my assessment. That's the assessment of the Trump intelligence community leadership. Speaker 0: Some of those 51 so called intelligence officials who signed that letter to rig the 2,020 election, they admitted that's why they wrote it. Some of them were active CIA contractors and that's curious because one of their main talking points every time we brought this up that this is how the election was rigged, at least in one part, they tell us, well, they were independent people. They were free citizens. They were not actually employed by the CIA and so you can't say that the CIA was responsible for any of this or that the government was involved in rigging the election. And of course, that's obviously ridiculous. We know that the CIA operates agents all the time, not necessarily employees who show up with a name tag and a badge and a desk. We've seen the CIA movies. We know how this works. They're contractors. If one person does something bad, they disavow that person and they get burned. So it's the same thing that's happening here. They use this talking point as though these 51 people had no connections with the CIA even though they were all ex CIA, ex intelligence. Now we know that some of those cosigners were actually CIA contractors. And so the New York Post gives us some of the background on it. We're gonna look at the actual report coming up because congress put together a very nice brief and we're gonna go through it. But here, some background from Washington. Some of the spies who lied were active CIA contractors, a fact that was uneasily noted inside the agency Because they all told us, like, no, we're retired like college professors. We have no connection to the agency. Former CIA acting director who already told congress this is Michael Morell, this guy right here. He literally says, I wrote it because I didn't like Trump. He said I wanted to give Biden a talking point ahead of the debate against Trump. That guy was under contract with the CIA. No. He didn't work for the CIA is what they told us. He was independent. No. He was being paid by the CIA. He had a contract with them. Ex agency inspector general, David Buckley, was also a contractor at the time, according to another report. And records suggest that at least 2 other letter signers may have also had active contracts at the time. So they were working for the CIA. The terms of the contracts and the compensation were not immediately clear. Morell flatly denied he was a contractor when contacted. He said, if you write that, you would be wrong. Morell doubled down in a second email. He said, I can't speculate on why he was listed. They said, well, why were you listed by the CIA as being a contractor? He says, I can't speculate on why I was listed there. He says, it's wrong. I was not. Yeah. Right. A congressional source provided the post with the CIA's documents outing Morell as a contractor after his denial. K? So Morell, the guy who organized the whole thing, denies it. So on April 25th, here's the letter. The honorable Michael Turner, the honorable Jim Jordan, signed here by deputy general for litigation and investigations, Robert Dugas, writing from the CIA, unclassified. That's their what their letter head looks like. Says, okay. Dear Chairman Turner and Chairman Jordan, CIA writes, I write to provide an unclassified document related to your letters about the CIA. You're asking about oversight about the public statement on the Hunter Biden email signed by 51 former intelligence officials. Now pursuant to a request, this 9th production contains a document showing whether each of the 5 individuals was under contract with the CIA directly or through a contracted company on October 19, 2020. Sincerely, deputy general counsel, the lawyer for litigation and investigations Robert Dugas. Okay. So here are the people who used to work or were contracted. Was John Brennan contracted with the CIA directly or through a company on October 19, 2020? John Brennan? No. Mark Polymeropoulos? No. Nick Rasmussen, no. But Michael Morell, yes. Oh, Michael Morell. Oh, no. How come that's on this document? Michael, why is that right here? That's your name. And it says, yes, you have a contract with the CIA. Speaker 1: It's very confusing. I don't know what it is. Speaker 0: So David Buckley also, yes. Had a contract with the CIA. Shocking because they told us that they didn't work for the CIA, but they have contracts. Unclassified signed by the CIA. Oh, that sucks for them because that makes them even bigger liars, which we already knew they were liars. We already knew they worked for the CIA, that's why they signed the letter. And every single left liberal loser who says, well, they're just totally independent citizens who just had concerned about the Russians is now blown out of the water. So we're gonna read through this full report because this came out from the US House of Representatives. It's a full report. Lots of more details on that. So we'll get there in a minute. But first, wanna share this quick message with you from our friends at Ground News. Take a look at this story I found about attorney general Merrick Garland's whining, calling legitimate criticism against his office attacks on the DOJ. And with all the misinformation out there today, you may have missed this one. I'm looking at this on Ground News, an awesome website and app that combines related news from all over the world and political spectrum into one place. You can check them out by going to ground.news/rge or just click the link in the description below. Ground news has been an excellent tool for my everyday research when I'm prepping the show and I think it will be for you too. Let me show you how it works. Here you can see over 10 sources are covering this story and that more coverage is coming from the left and the center than on the right which makes sense. We can also see the difference in the headlines with outlets like CNN repeating Garland's claims while the right calls him out. But not all stories are equal. Using their blind spot feed helps you identify what the media is and isn't covering on either side of the political spectrum and helps you catch stories that you may be missing. Brown news is amazing because it helps you see what friends and family with opposing views are seeing. And with the upcoming 2024 elections, this will be very important. It's super easy to get set up. Just go to ground dot news slash rge or click the link in the video description below. If you sign up through my link, you'll get 40% off the Vantage plan which is what I use to get unlimited access to all their features. I think Ground News is doing important work and I hope you'll check them out. Visit ground.news /rge. Now we look at the house report that details what really went down with the 51 so called intelligence officials who now we know are actually morons. This is the report from congress. The intelligence community. How CIA contractors colluded and their contractors with the Biden campaign to mislead American voters. They rigged the election. The CIA and Joe Biden rigged it. Anthony Blinken, who's now the secretary of state, met with Michael Morell. They created talking points and they were working for the CIA. So here's a summary. The committee on the judiciary, its selective subcommittee on the weaponization of the federal government, and the permanent select subcommittee have all revealed how 51 former idiots coordinated with the Biden campaign to discredit the Biden family influence peddling schemes. They issued a public statements and they sought to cast doubt on the New York Post story. They literally called it Russian disinformation. It feels like a bad movie. We were wind back there and there was a huge portion of this country that was out there saying it was Russian disinformation. You're crazy and then they censored the news. So president Biden even cited to the statement in a televised debate. He held it up. Now, we now know that the former 51 intelligence officials weren't actually former. I mean, they're actually working. They were contracted there, so I'd get rid of that. I mean, some of them were actual still officials. Maybe not officially with the government, but they were contractors, so I don't know if they're former. Was a blatant political operation from the start. It originated with a call from a top Biden campaign official, Anthony Blinken, and that went to former deputy CIA director Michael Morell. Those 2 colluded. No charges for them. The committee investigation revealed that without this outreach from Blinken, so Biden reached out to the CIA, Morell wouldn't have done it. Morell told the committees that Blinken triggered his intent to write the statement, his words. The statement drafters were open about the goal. We think Trump will attack Biden on the Hunter laptop. And so he said, this is what Morell said, we want to give the vice president a talking point to use in response. The CIA created fake news. They actually manufactured misinformation. Michael Morell, a CIA contractor, used to direct the place, so it's about as close as you can get without being the actual director, created disinformation, blamed the Russians, which is freaking insane to blame another power for trying to interfere with your election to say, wait, okay, so they're trying to elect Trump? Like, we should go to war with them for that. So the details as revealed by the committees to date are concerning enough, but as the committees have continued to investigate, new information has come to light. Now through newly obtained internal CIA emails and testimonial evidence, the committees have uncovered more information on the extent to which the intelligence community was involved in the statement. Specifically, here's what the evidence shows. High ranking CIA officials up to and including then CIA director, Gina Haspel, were made aware of the Hunter Biden's statement prior to its approval and publication. So she knew that they were writing this, that all of this was being spread around. They probably left it next to the donuts, you know, by the coffee. Hey, you want a donut? Hey, Sign this letter for us. Now because several former senior intelligence officials signed the statement, the p c r b sent the draft statement to her COO at the CIA, who then subsequently told her that the statement would be published. Hey, CIA director. You run this whole organization. You know that there's gonna be a letter that's gonna be published by 51 so called ex intelligence officials, and it's gonna be kind of attributed to the CIA. You down with that? No comment. Senior CIA leadership had an opportunity at that time to slow down the process to make sure it was vetted. Didn't care. Some of the statement signatories, including Michael Morell, were on active contract with the CIA at the time. Now throughout the course of the committee, the signatories, all 51, claimed to not have had access to any classified information about any of this when they said it had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. Yeah. Right. However, at the time of the statement's publication, at least 2 signatories, Morel and inspector general, who should know better, David Buckley, they were on the CIA's payroll as contractors. And due to purported operational concerns, the CIA declined to declassify the entire universe of signatories who were on active contract. So there may be others who were on contract but just undercover. They were the agents that are classified. Like, these are unclassified. You get to know about these guys. In addition, some signatories to the Hunter Biden statement also had special, quote, green card access to the CIA at the time of the statement's publications, allowing them to gain entry to secure CIA facilities. So they were working for the CIA and at the CIA when they were signing these letters, and the CIA director who was in charge of the CIA knew about it and allowed it to go forward. After publication of the Hunter statement, the CIA employees expressed concern that was politicized. They said, you know, this is not helpful to the agency in the long run. So some people wake up over there. At least one employee found it to be interesting to see what was submitted and approved when discussing media talking points. When discussing Paula Miropoulos and his talking points, another CIA official stated, quote, it appears that Paula Miropoulos is actively involved in a pro Biden campaign, maybe disclosing classified information about our efforts. Now the pre publication review board determined that the talking points contained classified information that had to be removed prior to publication. Wow. So the CIA's internal review board approved this? So they actually the CIA officially approved the letter? Let's see. The new information included this report shows the potential dangers here. In the waning days before the election, 51 intelligence officials rushed to draft the statement because they claimed they had specialized knowledge. The statement was conceived following a conversation with Blinken to Murrell. Some of the signatories were on the CIA payroll at the time. Others were working at CIA facilities. Even Murrell, before the committee learned of this contract, acknowledged. He said it's inappropriate for a currently serving staff officer or contractor to be involved in the political process. He forgot about his contract, I guess. The infamous Hunter Biden statement had all the hallmarks of an intelligence community influence operation. Well done. That is a quote essentially from their letter. The Hunter Biden laptop has all the hallmarks of a Russian influence operation. They took their line and they just rephrased it. But rather than carrying it out against our adversaries on foreign soil, this operation was directed at the American people and our democratic processes. It's impossible to know for certain how events would have played out differently if these 51 liars never sought to rig the election. All the committee may do is now present the facts and hope that we can do something about this. So let's go through some of the highlights of it. Says the CIA at the highest levels was aware of this statement prior to its publication. The drafters of the public statement have long maintained the CIA had no part in the approval of the statement. Beyond confirming the statement contained no classified info, but nope, not true, says we know that the director of the CIA, Gina Haspel, and the deputy director Von Frederick Bishop were made aware. Their awareness came via the PCRB, which is the internal CIA office responsible for reviewing and clearing publications by intelligence community officials. Okay. So we now have 3 things. 1, they were paid. So there was money. They got paid for it. They work at the CIA, and they also basically approved it. Okay. So they confirmed that this was okay to be approved. So they work at the CIA, like physically at the CIA. They made money and they approved it. That's the three ways that the CIA rigged the election. Now although the p c r b routinely reviews a manuscript without elevating it, in this case, they did elevate it. They said, uh-oh. This is pretty big. They took it to the COO and then the COO notified Morel that the PCRB approved it. So then, Haspel, the CIA director, instituted a review process. She would have seen it. According to testimony from the COO, she instituted a policy requiring the p c r b to flag for her review all submissions for final approval. She did so after several officials wrote stuff that got some news coverage. She says, okay, look. I don't want this to happen again. So she made a rule change and then they published this. So presumably, she hasn't answered questions on it, but presumably, she went through the same approval process as in other submissions. So she saw it. Here is an email talking about a rush job. So here's an excerpt from a CIA email. This is what it looks like. From Michael Morell, the guy who was colluding with the Blinken's and Biden's to someone else, copied Mark, public statement converted, doc and a PDF. Says good morning. Hope everyone had a nice weekend. Attaches the statement that Mark and I drafted that many former senior and working level officials from across the IC will sign and then be made public. We are 100% confident it does not contain classified information. Indeed, it specifically says, we don't know what the IC or the FBI knows about this. This is a rush job, says Michael Morell, as it needs to get out as soon as possible. Do you know why? Because we had a debate coming up, and Anthony Blinken needed Joe Biden to be able to say that. So they engineered an intelligence operation to rig the election to persuade with this info the American people from knowing the truth. The p c r b staff acknowledged the receipt of the statement. They said, oh, we got it. Perfect. We know what's going on. They sent the statement to the COO. They said high importance. They received the notification. Then they gave the statement to the CIA director to flag it for their awareness. During an interview question, Matt Credes, the COO. Okay. So mister COO. So then after you determine that the article that you received was written by a former senior official, Michael Morell, a director, then you would alert either the director or deputy director. Is that right? Yeah. What did that process look like? Was that just, hey, heads up, you know, this is coming. Was there a conversation? How did that typically look? So the typical process was once I saw it and sort of saw that it was from a former senior, I would bring it to the attention of either the director or the deputy director. It would depend on the day who was available. And how did it work in this case with the statement? You know, I don't recall exactly, but the process that I have just described is probably the way it worked. I would have stepped across the hall and said, here's an article. It's come up from the p c r b. They said there is no classification information in it, and it's going to run. And since this statement was being signed by director Brennan, director Clapper, director Panetta, director Morel, do you know if you flag this for the awareness since it's like everybody that you've ever known? They would have seen, you know, if I provided them a copy, which is my normal process, they would have seen who the authors were. So like they knew. Gina knew. They all knew. Like, oh crap. There's like 5 other directors on there. I guess the statement's going out. So the Hunter Biden statement drew significant attention at the CIA senior staff level. McCreadis as the COO was the 3rd highest ranking official there with over 37 years. In his testimony before the committee, the COO stated that he had never seen a statement of this nature come across his desk before, obviously. Have you seen anything like the public statement in all of your years of experience like this? Like, you mean with that many signatories of that caliber, who had all the held the prestigious positions within the intelligence community, especially the CIA, people you knew personally, anything like that? No. I had not seen anything of that nature, obviously. So despite acknowledging the extraordinary nature of the Hunter statement, none of the top three officials paused the statements review process within the CIA or raised any concerns about how this might impact the agency's credibility. Of course not, because it was an operation. The CIA alerted the office of the director of National Intelligence about it as well, and they had no objections to the statements released. So the government was signing off on it. CIA approved it. They paid for it, and they had an office where they could work. And then they just had their ex CIA agent, so it's fine. So then here's another one. Request a quick turnaround. Here's another one. From an ODNI equity perspective, DNI prepub has no objections to this release. However, we defer to you to provide the official clearance decision to the requesters. So please advise so now the DNI is also signing off on this rigged letter. So CIA's in on it and the DNI is on it. On the same day that they cleared the Hunter statement, which alleged that stories about Hunter's laptop were hallmarks of Russian disinfo. Then DNI John Ratcliffe issued a statement that the laptop story was not part of some Russian disinfo campaign. Right? Trump is still in office. No. It's not. The intelligence community doesn't believe that because there is no intelligence that supports that at all. Notably, as the most senior intelligence community official, Ratcliffe, would have been the most informed individual on this and the best equipped to make any judgments about it. So it's unclear why they felt it was necessary to consult with the DNI regarding the statement. The COO of the CIA he had never reached out to his counterpart about the Speaker 1: ODNI about a statement before, and he could Speaker 0: not explain why they felt we needed this. Simultaneously, the COO also could not refute the possibility that this was political. Mister COO of the CIA, director of National Intelligence, they're asking about the ODNI office, director of National Intelligence, they're asking about the ODNI, office of the director of National Intelligence says, have you ever interacted with any of your counterparts over at the ODNI about these kind of statements, notifying for your director or anything? Did you also occasionally reach over to them, so to speak, to let them know that this was coming down the pike? He says, I don't recall reaching over to the ODNI on any of these. Do you think that the review of this submission rose to the ODNI's COO's level due to the impact the statement could have on the 2020 election? Is that at all possible? I don't know the DNI process, says the CIA. They may have a similar process to what we did. Anything written by a former senior would rise up to the chief operating officer to inform their principals. So they may have had a similar process that we did in place. I don't know. The Hunter Biden statement garnered enough interest within the CIA that it felt compelled to flag the statements. This was a unique procedure. The decision to share this widened the circle of impact the statement had. Widen the circle of people responsible and they should have considered this before wrecking the integrity of the agency. Now the CIA's office also informed the p c r b that it could approve the Hunter statement. They said that they had no role beyond just looking at it. However, the executive assistant sent an email saying it may notify former director Morrell that I guess it's good. You may notify former dd CIA Morel. 1 hour later, they notified Morel that he could publish it, and he did. The CIA and the PCRB completed this entire process, which included notifying top CIA officials and coordinating with the ODNI in 6 hours, man. The government moves fast when they have a political operation that they need to get done. And they needed this done for the debate. Michael m sends this. Here's a question from p c r b staff. Dear Michael, the pre publication classification review board completed its review of your article. Okay. So the CIA reviewed it and they signed off on it. The board determined it contains no classified info and can be published. Agency approval for publication of this material does not represent agency endorsement or verification of this work. Okay. Sure. So they're just gonna write, hey, we're CIA all over the place, but you don't endorse it. It can now be published. Thumbs up from the CIA. Good job. The documents and the testimony suggest that they treated this specially. They got a quick response, and they complied with Morel's request that this is a rush job. They appeared to believe this was unique. They even sent it over to the DNI. In their own analytic standards, the DNI says we have to be objective here. Every individual who came in contact with the Hunter Biden statement all the way up to Gina Haspel had an opportunity to say this is to say this is probably not true. We were saying that it Speaker 1: was clearly Hunter's laptop Speaker 0: and I've never been in the CIA. We're in the intelligence communities. I don't know how we were able to figure that out here by looking at the email headers and just matching it with his public calendar. Weird. The draft Hunter Biden statement was reviewed and passed around, and they all said, yeah. This said that you have Russian. Some of the signatories were on active CIA contracts. Internal CIA documents show that several signatories, including Morel, were on active CIA contract at the time. They were earning an income supported by the American taxpayer while politicizing intelligence to rig the election in favor of Joe. Former intelligence officials interviewed repeatedly asserted that they were just a group of private citizens. We have first amendment rights, and this is a matter of public interest. We didn't have access to classified information. We just have strong opinions. During this interview with the committees, Morell testified, I got no access to classified stuff. Are you kidding? Have you any had any conversations with officials at the FBI, Michael Morell, ex CIA? No. Had you been privy to any classified briefings about this? No. Mister Morel, as a part of the research that you did between the contact with mister Blinken and the contact with Mark Paliomeropoulos, did you contact any individuals as part of that research? I did not. So the sum of your research involved your internet searches. You just were on the internet? Just what you did? Yes. Okay. So CIA director Morel is on the internet and he came to a conclusion apparently that it was the Russians. Now we did the same thing. That's all we had access to here. We were listening to Bob Yolinsky, looking at the leaked files and then matching it to Hunter's calendar and other news articles about where he was as the VP's son. It matched. It was clearly his. So it's weird. I wonder maybe I should be the director of the CIA and you should also because you clearly see this. But the other primary drafter of the public statement, Mark, similarly said no access to classified information. John Brennan similarly did not have access to classified information. In his transcribed interview with the committee, James Clapper stated he did not seek access to any classified information when he signed the statement. Here's what Clapper said. Hey, James. Well, you're the former director of National Intelligence, James, who's about to make a very public statement about a very specific thing. You were claiming it's likely the Russians. You had the clearance on this. You could have requested a briefing on it. Right? Why did you not even consider requesting a briefing on this? Well, I didn't do it because I didn't think it was appropriate. Why? Because I didn't want to be tainted by access to classified information. But why would it be tainted to try to find the truth before you signed it? He says, sorry. Bad choice of words. I wanted only to go on what I had seen publicly. That's all. I didn't want any connection with the classified information in any way. Well, it confuses me why you would be willing to sign a letter like this. I mean, you had access to agencies who could have clarified it and you didn't consider even nor make an effort to find out if what you were about to say was true or not. Well, I thought it was proper and appropriate to sound a warning that the Russians could be involved. That's all. Just a warning. Each signatory interview sought to assure the committees they had no access to classified info. But even still, the use of their official titles, their security credentials could be read to suggest that they did by design. They said that the statement could appear more legitimate because the signatories used their intelligence titles clearly. Yeah. They all said that they were ex CIA. If they didn't want to use the CIA's label, they should've left that off. At the end of this statement, the 51 intelligence officials, they all use their former titles. Many of these titles are former director, former DNI, former director CIA. Questions, mister COO. If you're an average citizen reading the statement, do you think the titles of their former office could have boosted the legitimacy of their claims that the Russians did this? Do you think that that would appear more legitimate because of their former titles maybe? I think that's possible. Yeah. He confirmed that applying their titles, they could have leveraged their power to persuade Americans. That alone is concerning. It was done by design. Further investigations has revealed, however, that these former intelligence officials actually could have had access to this type of materials, and several of these people had active contracts with the CIA. Despite assertions that know that they didn't have any access, one internal email said this, wow. Look at this access, one internal email said this, wow. Look at this email. From somebody to somebody, classifications unclassified, someone says, yeah. So there's this political drop the article. Remember the article came out 51 people. It's spread all over the place like madness. Then this person sends these emails. Probably this one, 1013 is first. This one's at 1105. So this one comes first. This guy's complaining to a colleague. He says, oh, man. This frustrates me. I don't think it is helpful to the agency in the long run Psy. Right? It's like, oh, gosh. He links to the political article. This is not helpful. An actual person who wants the agency to do good work, not to become a bunch of partisan hacks. Then this person responds, yeah. I also love that at least a few of the random signatures here belong to individuals currently working here on contracts Yeah. It's just a bunch of nice citizens who are concerned about poo dee poo. Interfering in our elections. Yeah. Right. Even the CIA. Inside the CIA, they're sending emails like, wow. We just conducted an operation here in America. Amazing. So following the review of the document, committees requested the identities of the contractors. While the CIA has not declassified the complete list who were on contract, it has told us 2 people were Michael Morell and David Buckley were active contractors. Morell and Buckley were earning taxpayer dollars from their work. Michael Morell and Buckley getting paid to rig the election. Beyond the access to information, it's concerning that they're on contract. Even Morell, the actual architect of this statement, acknowledged in a transcribed interview it would be inappropriate for anybody who was a contractor to be involved in the process. Mister Morel testified before congress that it would be inappropriate for a currently serving staff officer or contractor to be involved in the political process. Do you agree with Morel's statement? I think that's generally understood. Now it appears that the CIA leadership never expressed any concern about the Now it appears that the CIA leadership never expressed any concern about the fact that he was on active contract. If you were on active contract, the p c r b, the review board should've handled that, but there's no indication they even looked at it. They did the whole thing in 6 hours. Now although the Hatch Act political restrictions don't apply to federal contractors like they do the CIA, they would have looked at the ethics about this to green light the statement. Now the CIA also produced documents shedding light on conflicts of interest with the contractor status. They tell us that Buckley, like Murrell, was also on active contract, but Buckley also held a green badge, which gives holders access to secure CIA facilities, and he had access at the time that Hunter Biden's statement was published. According to the CIA, Buckley was either on active contract or with green badge access to all CIA facilities until April 2022. Historically, it's only given to people who regularly employed by the CIA or are permanently assigned. In Buckley's case, this would mean he retained unfettered access to all CIA facilities through April 2022. Murrell was hired back as a contractor in May 2021. Was also hired back as a contractor after the publication of the statement. Just amazing. So here you go. Was he approved? Yeah. Morrell, independent contractor. No fee senior advisory services, independent contractor from 5/21 to 10/21, and he's got security clearances. David Buckley back here. Did he held hold a security clearance on the security clearance on the date of the publication on 10/19? Yes, they did. High security clearance, top secret security, and those were the dates. David Buckley and Michael Morell held security clearance, and as the prior document we looked at said, he was also the active contractor here on the date of October 19, 2020. So Michael Morell active contractor on the same date. Amazing. So it's extremely concerning that signatories of the statement were in contract on contract at the time of the statement's drafting, review, and publication. It shows that Murrell, Buckley, and likely other signatories were getting taxpayer monies to mislead Americans for Joe Biden. Our CIA rigged our own election against us. Such an overly political action would be illegal under the law. Congress ought to consider extending this prohibition to contractors as well because they just outsource it now. They knew that this statement was political. Morell and Polyamuropalis, they knew that there was a political mission. Morel said this specifically. There were 2 intents. Why did you write this statement? 1, was to share our concern with the American people that the Russians were playing on this issue. What? The election. And 2, it was to help vice president Biden, specifically. Our goal at the CIA was to help vice president Biden. His quote, moreover, Morel and Palaiomiropoulos informed prospective signatories of the intent of the statement prior to its publication. This is why we're writing this. Writing that the statement was meant to insulate Biden from electoral vulnerabilities from his influence peddling activities that the CIA was probably involved in. Given the fact that some of the signatories were on active contract with the CIA, an organization that's not allowed to operate domestically, their efforts to score political points for vice president Biden undermine the agency. Here is another email. Question from Michael Morell to Michael m copying Mark Pete. Says, Mark and I drafted the attach because we believe the Russians were involved in some way in the Hunter Biden email issue In some way. And because we think Trump will attack Biden on the issue at this week's debate, and we wanna give the VP a talking point to use in response. This is from Michael and Mark. This is their draft. We'd be honored if each of you would be willing to join us in signing the letter. If you do agree to sign, please let me know how would you like your affiliation to read. For those CIA officers on the BCC line, so there's a BCC here, I would like to find a way to highlight your Russia work if appropriate. For example, Mark's citation will read, Mark p, former Speaker 1: senior CIA operations officer, former acting chief of operations for Speaker 0: Europe and Eurasia. If you want to former acting chief of operations for Europe and Eurasia. If you want to agree to sign, but make that conditional on seeing who else is willing to sign, I'm happy to send you the final list probably tomorrow before obtaining your final approval. So if you're a little weenie, wait till you see who else is signing and then join in on the crowd because all you basically do or it's just whatever your friends do because you're just government bureaucrats with no creativity or independent thought. I will clear the statement with the publication review board at the CIA tomorrow to get Joe his talking point in time for the debate, Michael and Mark. Actual exploitation using the CIA. Please see attached. We'd love to have you sign. Trying to get Dan Coats to join us. Michael, I'll gladly sign. I said this on CNN on Friday. James Clapper hates Trump. I have one suggestion. I think it would strengthen the verbiage. If you would say this has all the classic earmarks of Soviet Russian information operation rather than the feel of a Russian operation. I think that's actually a good line. Yeah. It was a good one. Michael, he says it feels like a Russian operation. He says feeling is not good. Let's this is good. James Clapper is a bonafide CIA hack. Says no no no. Let's call it classic earmarks rather than feel. It's good. It's a good edit. It would have been even dumber with feel. So Michael says, yeah. And your editorial suggestion has been made. It was a good one. He's like, that's why we like you, James. So they are just editing their rigged statement, and then the statement goes out. They tell us, on October 18, 2020, morale, the key orchestrator behind the statement, who was receiving taxpayer dollars through a CIA contract, drafted an email that they sent to a group of former intelligence officials asking them to sign the statement, and we saw that. We just read through it. Then they noted, these guys noted this frustrates me. I don't think this is helpful at all. Could you please read the contents? Yeah. This guy said it frustrates him. I don't recall this email, but why was the person frustrated? I don't know. I guess it's an interesting question. Did you have any personal frustrations, mister COO? You know, I think the agency's work is best done when it doesn't sorta splash across the press, but that's a general thing. And I think most CIA officers would sorta say the same thing. So I think you were asked in the last hour, is it your opinion that this statement of the 51 people was a political statement because of the investigation that followed? Was that your testimony? Well, I said I wouldn't be involved in politics. Right? So that's what you're sort of getting at, I mean. It's talking about president Trump and vice president Biden. I mean, you can't read that and say there isn't politics involved in there. And unlike other intelligence officials, Matt Cridis said he took issue with the nature of the statement. Would you have signed this statement? He says, as I said earlier, I stay out of politics, and so for that reason, I would not have signed the statement. But the CIA approved it, signed off on it. 1 of the CIA employees wrote an internal email noting that it was interesting that they approved them in the first place. Wow. Interesting to see what was submitted and even approved. Can't believe it. In another email, another CIA staff member described this as engaging in a pro Biden campaign that may be disclosing classified information. So even the internal people of the CIA were grossed out. Disclosing classified information. So even the internal people of the CIA were grossed out. He wrote from Fox News, the lead dissemination mechanism inside the US is senator Johnson, and there's no limit of people who will lap up Russian propaganda. It's all the Russians. Now it's concerning enough that his talking point sought to discredit the Hunter laptop prior to the 2020 election. The COO said, now someone trying to assist a presidential campaign potentially using classified information from the CIA, that's a bigger no no. Right? Use of classified information regardless of the purpose is a no no. Right? Whether it's for personal gain, political gain, that's a no no. But the CIA lacked any safeguards and they just approved the whole thing. So in conclusion, this insane report tells us the statement signed by the officials was interference in the electoral system in the final weeks before the election, obviously. The highest officials within the CIA were aware of the statement prior to its publications. The lead architect, the inspector general were active on contract with the CIA. Raises concerns about abuse. It got expedited approval and they requested quick decisions and they got it. The signatories leveraged their authorities. This was poor judgment, prevented the agency from being deemed as legitimate. Now we think they're political. Now seasoned officials were able to subvert this process and they intended to do it to help Biden specifically. Unless and until they make serious oversight reforms, this is gonna be continue to be a problem. Without rigorous oversight of the intelligence community and without proper safeguards to prevent this from happening again, they are likely to continue to do this work. And as a result, we're gonna continue our oversight using the authority of the federal government to do that. So absolutely ridiculous that we have 3 major revelations here. CIA paid the people who wrote the letters. The CIA housed the people who signed the letters, and the CIA approved the letter that ultimately went out. All three items done by the CIA, our own government. And the Hunter Biden laptop was real. It was true. All legitimate. We talked about it. Basically, no evidence that it came from Russia at all. They just made it up, and they even had little draft sessions to make it even more propagandistic for us all, and they shoved it down our throats, and they stole an election as a result. So that is now on the record in writing. This guy was also someone who signed the letter, and his name is Jeremy Bash. Used to be married to Dana Bash, who is now moderating the second debate. Dana, not Jeremy. But here is what he was saying before he signed the letter. Speaker 2: This looks like Russian intelligence. This walks like Russian intelligence. This talks like Russian intelligence. This effort by Rudy Giuliani and the New York Post and Steve Bannon to cook up supposed dirt on Joe Biden Speaker 1: Oh, really? Looks like a classic Russian playbook disinformation campaign. That assessment, by the Speaker 2: way, is not my assessment. That's the assessment campaign. That assessment, by Speaker 1: the way, is not my assessment. That's the Speaker 2: assessment of the Trump intelligence community leadership, who in August of this year put out a statement saying that Andrei Derkash and Russian intelligence were trying to denigrate Joe Biden. And then the next month in September, Steve Mnuchin at the Treasury Department put out a statement saying that Derkash is a known Russian intelligence operative and has been for the last decade. So when the intelligence community goes in and warns Donald Trump that Rudy Giuliani is being worked over by Russian intelligence, and then Rudy Giuliani suddenly comes forward with these mysteriously created emails, probably hacked the Russian intelligence operation. We have to acknowledge the fact that the president of the United States is supporting, is condoning, is welcoming a Russian intelligence operation in 2020. Nicole, this is collusion in plain sight. We don't need a special counsel. We don't need congressional investigations. The president is acknowledging it and welcoming it with open arm. Speaker 0: Absolutely insane. This was clipped over from Cliff Heeper who put together a very nice clip there for us. And absolutely wild to have him look into the camera and lie to the people in order to help Joe Biden. These people have basically no souls. Probably why he had to marry Dana Bash. Anyway, very curious what that guy is doing out there. Talk about collusion. He colluded with 50 other people to sign a letter that resulted in a rigged election. Now, here are some of the people who are investigating this, explaining this is Mike Turner walking us through a little bit more about this. Speaker 3: Absolutely. Well, the House Intelligence Committee got these emails that showed that the manner in which this was presented and that we now know from the depositions that Jim's committee and my committee held that these individuals openly were talking about doing this letter solely to help Biden in his debate. Now what that means is we now all know that we saw Biden stand there in the middle of his debate and lie to the American public because he knew, of course, it wasn't Russian disinformation. When he said I have a letter, it says this is Russian disinformation. There's nothing to this. Biden was lying to the American public. But also, everyone who signed that letter, you know, IC 51 as they're called, they were lying. And depositions, they you know, one after the other would acknowledge they didn't even try to verify it. They knew what they were doing. This was totally political, totally for the debates, and they were lies. Speaker 0: And it was concocted by our own CIA, approved by them in the biggest political operation in maybe American history to rig an election to steal the presidency. They've done it, and we're glad that there is some exposure now happening. We'll see if there will be any repercussions happening for these people who created a conspiracy to rig and deprive us of our rights to have a free and fair election. We'll see if Trump wins and his DOJ comes in. If they'll do anything about it, we sure hope that they do because this was a conspiracy, and it was something that was organized and engineered for a political purpose. Can't stand in America. So we'll continue to cover it, my friends. We hope you join us as we do. Thank you for subscribing wherever it is you're watching this. Thanks for liking our channel, and thanks for inviting someone you know to come over and join us so they can also see how disgusting and corrupt our government is. We'll look forward to seeing you back here and we have another great video coming up next about the j 6 committee and exactly how illegitimate they are because the house of representatives just went through a small vote and it's a good one. We'll talk about that in the next segment. We'll see you over there and back here on the next one.
cryptopunkard
Posted - February 11, 2024 at 3:54 PM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 4:53 PM

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@wendyp4545 Over 100,000 CCP Special Ops already in America. The destruction they could do is unlike anything America has ever experienced. https://t.co/buVb2NwwWN

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is concern about a potential constitutional crisis similar to the Civil War due to the issue of border crossings. The speaker emphasizes that the federal government has a responsibility to protect states from invasion, and the number of people crossing the border is seen as invasion-like. The speaker mentions the example of 100,000 individuals coming from China, who are described as military-age men and special operatives. The potential for sabotage in the upcoming 2024 election year is highlighted, and the speaker questions why other states and Congress are not taking action like Governor Abbott.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There could be a constitutional crisis like we have we have not seen since the civil war and I don't think people fully appreciate that. Speaker 1: Walk me through that because it's that yeah. I can feel it already. Speaker 0: Well, this whole idea of a republican guarantee and that the federal government guarantees to the states that they're that they will be protected from invasion is pretty clear and it's not ambiguous. And the idea that there are people crossing our border and one, we don't know where they're from. They're coming in numbers that are invasion like, if not literally an invasion, the 100,000 coming from communist China, these are military age men. Speaker 1: It's 10 come Frank Gaffney's got the piece up right now in War Room. Natalie just got it up for us. I need to put up in Denver and grace and money to put it in Carly, if you can, in our telegraph telegraph if you need to put it up. The this is remember, we say a 100,000. That's 10 combat. People understand 10,000 is a combat division. We hit the beaches in Normandy, for D Day, I think with a 145,000, troops. Patton's 3rd army was 325,000 troops. This is what happens in a month. These are these are massive massive combat division type invasions. Special operatives. Speaker 0: I mean, yes, combat divisions. They're not carrying rifles. These are special operatives who are in this country. The amount of sabotage they can create in this country in 2024, an election year. The idea we all praise the governor Abbott for for standing up this way. Where is everybody else? I think there's 25 states now signed up to this. But where is congress about? Okay.
cryptopunkard
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 12:12 PM
Saved - January 1, 2024 at 7:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of posts, I discuss the importance of watching an interview with Boris Epshteyn on Lawfare, highlighting that Donald J. Trump has the upper hand against these criminals. I also provide a link to download a whistleblower complaint. Additionally, I mention Crooked Joe's political indictments and share a video comparing Santa Trump to Grinch Biden. Finally, I celebrate the Supreme Court's denial of Special Counsel Smith's request for an expedited review, stating that this is a significant loss for the Special Counsel.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

The most important video you’ll watch today about Lawfare. One thing about Stephen K. Bannon, and his War Room show, is that he brings signal, not noise. Cut through the media lies, the spin from corrupt government officials, keyboard warriors and shills and go to the front lines of Lawfare. Watch this interview with Boris Epshteyn and you’ll see that Donald J. Trump has the upper hand on these criminals.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Boris Epshteyn discusses the recent developments in Colorado and the j6 committee. He highlights the decision made by the Colorado Supreme Court, which he considers a travesty, and mentions that President Trump is appealing to the Federal Supreme Court. He also emphasizes that all federal courts have found no evidence of election interference. Regarding the j6 committee, Epshteyn explains that President Trump's immunity motion has resulted in a full stay of the case, freezing all proceedings. He mentions that the DOJ is trying to expedite the case to the Supreme Court, but President Trump's team is opposing it, arguing that proper process should be followed. Epshteyn concludes by emphasizing the importance of standing for American jurisprudence and the Constitution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we're packed today on so many different topics. Let's start. We got Boris Epshteyn. I was able to step out of a meeting. Boris, even morning Joe had to admit, this is probably the greatest get out the vote effort we've ever had. I wanna deal with Colorado and and your take on Colorado, how it's, playing out, and then I wanna get to this very important, issues about immunity and all that. Can we start in Colorado? Your your thoughts on that. Speaker 1: Steve, I'm gonna be with you. I'm gonna be with the posse. My thoughts on Colorado are what they were 2 days ago. First of all, remember, this is very important for all the listeners, and MSNBC doesn't want to talk about it. CNN doesn't want to talk about it, but here's the reality. That decision by the Colorado Supreme Court, which is a total travesty, Even Bill Barr out there saying supreme court will slap it down. You've got Ty Cobb, no president of the president, saying 9 to nothing on the Supreme Court. But that decision, a total travesty is made by this Colorado Supreme Court itself pending a decision by the Federal Supreme Court. So here's what the Colorado Supreme Court did. They went on this big, long rant. You know, we got I mean, it is Obviously, you fucked derangement syndrome. And then they said at the end of it, well, this is what our feelings are, but we are so unsure of it on the law. We're staying our own decision until January 4. And if President Trump appeals to the Supreme Court, which we are doing, it stayed indefinitely. And that is vital to remember. It is vital to follow because the actual effect and remember, the primary ballots in Colorado are printed on January 5th. So the actual impact of this decision, what is it? A lot of screaming and crying on MSNBC and other outlets, but in the real world, not much because now president Trump is going to the super federal Supreme Court as it has been publicly stated. If you look at every federal court which has looked at this ridiculous election interference issue, they've all said there's nothing there. And why? Because it's clear as they first of all, section 3 over the 14th amendment does not apply to the president. That's 1. And second of all, on the fact, guess what? President Trump said peacefully and patriotically, he said go home in peace. He made statement after statement after statement. He asked for the National Guard, authorize the National Guard, statement after statement, action after action, promoting peace and stability, the opposite of any insurrection or incitement. And remember, remember, the DOJ, even the Biden, crooked Joe Biden controlled DOJ, did not charged president Trump with insurrection on sentiment. Why? Because even they couldn't stretch it that far, and it's obvious that they've tried to stretch everything as far as they could, all of these deranged prosecutors across the country have. So that's the reality of it. And that's cutting away all of the fluff, cutting away all of the heartfelt excitement by the deranged lives. Oh, we've been waiting for this for so long. Just like they said when when Alvin Bragg in New York brought that first completely empty, lawless, backless, no criminality indictment in April. Oh, we've been waiting for this, the Liberals cried out. And what happened? President Trump has dominated in the polls for month month month, it only gone up, and now it is an absolute annihilation. So the net result is that the American people are coalescing more and more and more around president Trump the more that these, let's just be honest, crazy radical liberals try to attack him and prevent him from taking office, which you will do on Jan 20, 2025. Speaker 0: If congress had moved, the the, Colorado has just taken the j six, committee report, which is a joke, and just submitted that as proof as the facts of how Donald Trump led an insurrection, which we know it's a complete joke, they didn't have a ranking member minority council cross examine so this is gonna get a chance to review. It's not committee. So should congress I don't know why. We know McCarthy. We had a town hall last night. Rahim will be on here to talk about it more with Gates, Biggs, Eli Crane, Rahim Khasama, and myself in in Arizona. The the discussion a lot. It was pretty pretty at a church too, cowboy church. Boris, one of the things the audience continue to bring up is why haven't, they understand McCarthy was double dealing Trump the whole time, but why isn't Mike Johnson why did they move forward and just overruled that. That committee thing is a joke, and now it's being used to drive the because you're right. Jack Smith it would crazed Jack Smith has every tool in the toolbox available to him, although he's totally illegitimate, and we're hoping that suit gets brought. Jeff Clark, something in a little later, talk about that. Why don't we just why didn't the congress just obliterate the original j six, and they have no no, predicate at all because Jack Smith knows the law, knows the facts, and knows that he could not get a conviction on president Trump for insurrection. Speaker 1: Well, Steve, it's you say that because and I wanna be careful what I say. But if you look at the letters that representative Latimer has been sending regarding the wrongdoing of the j six committee, there are steps, significant and fast steps in the works as we speak that will address just how lawless, just how legitimate, and how wrongful that committee was, and not just the makeup of the committee was completely legitimate. The actions of the committee were illegitimate, but then also the the leading and destroying of the document. And Betty Thompson, he can't answer anything. When did he go, oh, I didn't send any documents to, to watch it to Fani Willis. And then the next day, he's, oh, yeah. Of course, we send documents. The whole thing is like a macabre Saturday night skit. Literally, like, Saturday night, John Lowitz, oh, yeah. Sure. Sure. The liar. That's what Bennie Thompson's doing. He's been lying up and down about what they did with the information, just how much collusion there was between the UN Select Committee and Fawnee Wilson, Georgia, the UN Select Committee and other other deranged prosecutors? So right now, you do have vital members of congress under the leadership of speaker Johnson who are doing exactly see what you're talking about. And it's got to be done quick. It has to be done as soon as they're back in January. Speaker 0: Boris, I know you're busy. You guys stepping your means. I'd just like you to hold. We're gonna take a short commercial break. I gotta talk to you about this immunity and president Trump coming out. CNN is in full meltdown saying that president Trump is trying to delay things. The thing's the exact opposite. I wanna thank the team fronting together this great Christmas music. Boris Epshteyn joins us from the the kind of the overall wartime concierge on president Trump's, legal team will be with us as we return Speaker 1: in a moment. Speaker 0: Okay. Welcome back. Wanna thank the music team. Holly and the Ivy. We got Boris on here, so we thought we'd class it up with some, English carols. My favorites. Boris Epshteyn. See okay. I wanna I wanna stipulate for this discussion, we didn't have time because I got so much to go through and so many guests. Elie Hoenig, who is a very bright analyst, you know, former, I think, DOJ or prosecutor, never Trump. Trump hater. He's been out. And last night, I've got it up on Getter if you wanna go. He just saying, hey. This thing's a travesty. The, and then Bill Barr, the other hater coming out. He's he's basically said it's the dumbest thing they've done. It's gonna drive, MAGA to have a massive voter turnout. You've got, Ty Cobb. I have yesterday, we started the show. Ty Cobb nine nothing at the Supreme Court. So, Boris, you've got the haters. I mean, the people that have, really turned on president Trump the most or CNN analyst that hate him every night, just saying this Colorado thing is too over the top. But let's pivot to the to the one I think is actually more serious, and that's what's going on with j six. In this maniacal, the judge and and deranged Jack Smith are is just so obsessed on election interference. They have to go on for March. They have to start this trial. Right? Nothing can move it. So walk me through because you got this back and forth with immunity and you're gonna expedite immunity, not expedite immunity. Well, just tell our audience what's going on. Speaker 1: And that's why I love this audience because it cuts through all the noise and always gets to the signal. And here, The signal is actually pretty hidden, right, because there's so much procedural motion, so many different steps. But here's the here's what's happening right now. Because of president Trump's powerhouse immunity motion on presidential immunity, saying that it was his job and duty and right to question and investigate a, and I'll say it and I'll keep saying it, a rigged and stolen 2020 presidential election That all his actions are beyond the pale for any prosecution, be it by Derain's check Smith or anybody else out there, that it is all covered by presidential immunity, which is deeply rooted in American history, American jurisprudence, and common law. So president Trump's lawyers make make this robust motion. Of course, the DC judge, Chukin, denies the motion. But then because it's a motion on immunity, which is the positive to the case. So immunity arbitration motions, which if they're decided for a defendant that the end a case, be it civil or criminal, they have built in what's called an interlocutory appeal. I know I'm getting pretty legal each other. An interlocutory appeal means an appeal that you could take up all the way during the pendency of the case. And when immunity is in question, there's set precedent under Griggs and other key Supreme Court cases that says that a defendant is not just free from trial they're free from what's called the burdens of litigation, burdens of litigation. So then president Trump and his team go to Judge Chuck and his, she actually granted a full stay. Last week, she granted a full stay of that DC case, so nothing can move forward. Now, Derens Jaks, Prosecutors are still trying to send some of the discovery documents that Hold on. Speaker 0: Hang hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on one second. I wanna get the the full stay, that is not reported on mainstream media. You'd never hear that talked about. Just repeat that. Even Chunkin, what did she do? She stayed any further proceedings on this trial. Correct? Speaker 1: All proceedings on the DC case, the trial, the prelitigation motion, the Discovery, everything is fully spayed right now, frozen in time, frozen in time. Just imagine something's moving, and then ice hits. Boom. Frozen. That's the that's the status right now of that DC case, except for litigation on immunity. So because this immunity is such a major issue and because president Trump has such a strong argument in emotion on on the motion on immunity. Now the DOJ, of course, under the direction of crooked Joe Biden and that pathetic team, they've they're trying to run all the way to the Supreme Court saying, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, please, could you decide immunity? But here's the problem they have. And you that's what Elijonin was talking about. Other others were talking about. You can't appeal something when the lower court decided for you on it. Right. So Chuck can remember. She did not. So now the prosecutors, Deranged and others are, oh, well, we want to go to the Supreme Court. Wrong. You can't do that. It is the president's right to appeal that, and he's appealed it correctly through the proper process to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. And now the DC Circuit has laid out a laid out a schedule. The oral arguments are January 9. And so yesterday, President Trump, his powerhouse team, filed a really robust motion opposing that expediting to the Supreme Court. There was a motion to the Supreme Court filing to the Supreme Court saying we oppose the expediting, a, there's no jurisdiction because, again, it is impossible for the DOJ to appeal a case which they won in the district court And b, proper process should be followed. So that was the motion yesterday that Elie Hoehnen, and you got to give creditable creditors to do it, whichever on CNN talking about. And again, if you go back up 10,000 feet, what is all this about? Why did the DOJ invite me 3 years to bring a case and now are trying to rush it? Because they know that president Trump is dominating them in the election. It is all about election interference, and they're obsessed with trying to get to trial as soon as possible because that is the only way they can imagine beating president Trump, but they're failing at every step. Again, they waited for 3 years. Remember, these actions that they cannot criminalize but are trying to criminalize. Bill happened 3 years ago right about now. President Trump was investigating this corrupt election, 3 years right about now. And they waited for 3 years, and now they're saying, no. No. No. We can't wait for the Supreme Court to to decide this due in due course. But yes, they can, and yes, they will. President Trump and his attorneys are making sure that is exactly what happened, that we are standing for American jurisprudence, the American system of justice, and our very constitution in the very bedrock of our country. Speaker 0: Boris, how do people get to you? Speaker 1: Steve, thanks so much. The website is hot. Boracp.com. Set up right now on boracp.com. Hot on getter at Boris c p. Twitter at Boris, and the hottest on the ground, Boris underscore Epstein. Stay strong. God bless. Merry Christmas to all, and all all that. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Speaker 0: By the way, Boris, just send it to the team. You guys are just doing an incredible job. All the balls you have to juggle the complexity of all these different cases. It's just it's quite frankly amazing. The team we've put together and, how how it's working together and and really grinding through this stuff quite quite quite extraordinary, so thank you from the

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

I’ll add this here.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Special Counsel Jack Smith, you’ve been a very naughty boy! Link to download the whistleblower complaint: https://www.deepcapture.com/2023/12/extortionist-jack-smith-is-being-extorted-to-pursue-trump/

Is Extortionist Jack Smith Being Extorted to Pursue Trump? – Deep Capture deepcapture.com

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

https://t.co/1ivxfBe5p5

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Mr. President @realDonaldTrump speaks.

@TrumpDailyPosts - Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social

Crooked Joe’s Political Indictments Make America Look Like A Corrupt Democracy… https://t.co/bkwDSXIsjx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our adversaries are using the indictments against me to claim that the United States is a corrupt and failing democracy. They are using it extensively, making us appear like a third world country or a banana republic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our adversaries are using the Crooked Joe Biden indictments of his political opponent, me, against us by strongly proclaiming that the United States is a corrupt and failing democracy. They are using it left and right. They are using it like never before. They are making us look very bad, making us look like a third world country or a banana republic.

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@realDonaldTrump Santa Trump vs Grinch Biden. Thanks to @bennyjohnson https://t.co/bPoO09lrfy

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@realDonaldTrump @bennyjohnson And BOOM! Jack Smith is done line dinner. Thank you SCOTUS.

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

The Supreme Court has denied Special Counsel Smith's request for an expedited review of the case against Trump. There won't be a trial in DC before the 2024 election. No mistake - this is a big loss for the Special Counsel. https://t.co/nCNiiJe5lG

cryptopunkard
Posted - August 30, 2023 at 11:17 PM
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 8:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A comprehensive list of former intelligence officials and their current roles: 1. Mike Hayden - Ex-CIA director, now CNN analyst 2. Jim Clapper - Former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit 3. Leon Panetta - Former CIA director and defense secretary 4. John Brennan - Former CIA director, now NBC and MSNBC analyst 5. Thomas Fingar - Ex-National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford 6. Rick Ledgett - Former NSA deputy director, now director at M&T Bank 7. John McLaughlin - Former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins 8. Michael Morell - Former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University 9. Mike Vickers - Ex-defense undersecretary for intelligence, now at BAE Systems 10. Doug Wise - Former DIA deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico ... (continued)

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

A list for the history of the steal. 1 Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN 2 Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit 3 Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary 4 John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC 5 Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University 6 Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank 7 John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University 8 Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University 9 Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems 10 Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico 11 Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism 12 Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism Center acting director 13 Andy Liepman, former National Counterterrorism Center deputy director 14 John Moseman, former CIA chief of staff 15 Larry Pfeiffer, former CIA chief of staff, now senior advisor to The Chertoff Group 16 Jeremy Bash, former CIA chief of staff, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC 17 Rodney Snyder, former CIA chief of staff 18 Glenn Gerstell, former National Security Agency general counsel 19 David Priess, former CIA analyst and manager 20 Pam Purcilly, former CIA deputy director of analysis 21 Marc Polymeropoulos, former CIA senior operations officer 22 Chris Savos, former CIA senior operations officer 23 John Tullius, former CIA senior intelligence officer 24 David A. Vanell, former CIA senior operations officer 25 Kristin Wood, former CIA senior intelligence officer, now non-resident fellow, Harvard 26 David Buckley, former CIA inspector general 27 Nada Bakos, former CIA analyst and targeting officer, now senior fellow, Foreign Policy Research Institute 28 Patty Brandmaier, former CIA senior intelligence officer 29 James B. Bruce, former CIA senior intelligence office 30 David Cariens, former CIA intelligence analyst 31 Janice Cariens, former CIA operational support officer 32 Paul Kolbe, former CIA senior operations officer 33 Peter Corsell, former CIA analyst 34 Brett Davis, former CIA senior intelligence officer 35 Roger Zane George, former national intelligence officer 36 Steven L. Hall, former CIA senior intelligence officer 37 Kent Harrington, former national intelligence officer 38 Don Hepburn, former national security executive, now president of Boanerges Solutions LLC 39 Timothy D. Kilbourn, former dean of CIA’s Kent School of Intelligence Analysis 40 Ron Marks, former CIA officer 41 Jonna Hiestand Mendez, former CIA technical operations officer, now on board of the International Spy Museum 42 Emile Nakhleh, former director of CIA’s Political Islam Strategic Analysis Program, now at University of New Mexico 43 Gerald A. O’Shea, former CIA senior operations officer 44 Nick Shapiro, former CIA deputy chief of staff and senior adviser to the director 45 John Sipher, former CIA senior operations officer 46 Stephen Slick, former National Security Council senior director for intelligence programs 47 Cynthia Strand, former CIA deputy assistant director for global issues 48 Greg Tarbell, former CIA deputy executive director 49 David Terry, former National Intelligence Collection Board chairman 50 Greg Treverton, former National Intelligence Council chair, now senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies 51 Winston Wiley, former CIA director of analysis

cryptopunkard
Posted - September 29, 2023 at 8:38 PM
Saved - September 30, 2023 at 8:35 PM

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

Mr. Elon please watch. This guy nails it. Pronouns & ego. One-in-the-same.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a morning walk, the speaker discusses pronouns. They explain that they use first person pronouns when referring to themselves and second person pronouns when others address them. The speaker states that gender only comes into play when speaking about someone in the third person, but they don't have third person pronouns because they only have first person pronouns. They mention that their true self is relative to others and that there is no true self. The speaker encourages the use of whatever pronouns make others comfortable. They also discuss the concept of ego and how it is just a thought, not the true self. The speaker emphasizes the importance of letting go of identity to avoid suffering. They conclude by expressing love and stating that they want nothing from the audience.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On my morning walk today I found some pronouns. People ask me all the time, what are your pronouns? I usually tell them, to me I am me and to you I am you. When I speak about myself I use the universal first person pronoun I and me. And when you are addressing me, like when you say what are your pronouns, you use the 2nd person pronouns you and your. You'll notice that when it is just a conversation between my self, or with you there is no gender. A person only acquires gender when spoken about in the 3rd person. And those those are the pronouns that you are asking for. So then what are my third person pronouns? Well, I don't have any because I only have first person pronouns. For me to tell you what my third person pronouns are I would have to speak about myself in a 3rd person. But I'm the first person, not the 3rd. 3rd person means you are speaking to a third person about me and not myself. Thus, who am I to tell you how to talk about me when I'm not there? Einstein. Weird tangent. I know. But Einstein showed that all measurements of objects exist only relative to other objects. What this means is that things about me only exist relative to others. And so my true self, the self that is relative to me well, there is no true self. Asking who I am to me is like asking the value of 10 relative to 10. Well, 10 relative to 9 has a value of 1. And 10 relative to 0 has a value of 10. But 10 relative to itself has a value of none. And the same is true for me. All thoughts occur only because they exist relative to what you have experienced outside of yourself. And so to think of the self would mean to think of myself relative to others. Thus, I say that you should feel free to use whatever pronouns you are most comfortable for women. If to you, I am masculine, then use the masculine pronouns. If to you, I am feminine, then use the feminine pronouns. But what pronouns do I use? Well, I use, I, and me, you might spend ask, so are you gender fluid? A gender non binary. No, maybe to you, but to me, I am me. So then who and what do you identify as? You may ask. Speaker 1: No one. I Speaker 0: have no identity. No one does. We're just making it up. You'll notice our ego, our sense of who we think our identity is. Is just a thought. The moment you stop thinking the ego goes away. You'll notice this is true in meditation or in deep sleep where thoughts no longer occur, you have no sense of self anymore. In Buddhism, this is the simple of anatman, no self. Truly, without mind, you are no one. But because you are not a mine, then you are no one. If you find this hard to accept, remember. No. You don't. Only the ego projects this idea because the ego wants power over you. That voice in your head calling itself I and me, it's not you. The ego it wants you to suffer. It wants you to get upset when something bad happens. It wants you to suffer when someone calls you names. But remember, Speaker 1: all of these are only a fictitious illusion of who you are. Speaker 0: Your true self cannot be a tech, there is no substance to attack. Speaker 1: When a person attacks you, Speaker 0: they are only attacking who they think you are. Only if you identify with what they're attacking will you suffer. If you want Speaker 1: to be free from suffering, bring Speaker 0: the let go of all identity. You might say, we'll see about that the next time you step on Lego. No. Speaker 1: I won't. The foot might hurt, but I Speaker 0: am not the foot. The foot may feel pain, and I may feel that the foot is feeling pain, but I am not the foot. So it does not hurt me. And now your ego might be saying, Speaker 1: but I have been a part of a hunder. What, what, how would you fit into society? I agree. You don't Speaker 0: fuck society. Well, now the ego might be saying, Oh, well, well, you don't want to be the weird guy at the Speaker 1: party. Imagine coming up to you Speaker 0: and then them having to hear a whole lecture about the philosophy of identity. Good. I could keep going. And every time your ego would grasp at straws trying to retain its power over you, trying to convince you that you're the one thinking what it's saying. But it's not. It's just a thought. Just a mental process that you are aware of as the all containing consciousness of your experience. If within you you feel rejection to this idea that make it known is the ego, the rejector Speaker 1: itself. But I hereby tell you to reject Speaker 0: the rejector. Give back power to your life. True power is true self acceptance to accept the self has no boundaries, no creed, no categories, no religion, no race, no gender, no ethnicity. The true self is beyond all forms. Speaker 1: Only forms have labels. And consciousness has none. Speaker 0: Alright. This will be the end of this video. Thank you for letting deconstruct your ego. Come back next month for the next deconstruction. The last thing I want anyone to remember is if at any point it sounded like I was speaking down to you or if I was being pretentious. I'm sorry. Remember that's the ego trying to have one last to attempt to try to avoid accepting what I'm saying. Truly. I do not feel any superior to you or anyone. Speaker 1: I love you for who you are. Speaker 0: But now that you go, might say that's reverse psychology or sort of manipulation tactic. Remember, I want nothing from you. When I say don't like, don't comment, don't follow, keep scrolling. I mean that. I literally want nothing from you. This is just my practice.
SaiKate108
Posted - August 3, 2023 at 8:38 AM
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 8:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer Australia faced tough questions in Senate hearings. They admitted not understanding how the vaccine causes myocarditis pericarditis. They also failed to provide evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission. Despite gene technology being part of the vaccine process, they refused to acknowledge it as gene therapy. Critics likened their responses to bots. Full hearing available. Health authorities worldwide continue to deceive. Kudos to Senator Rennick for exposing the truth.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

A tough day for Pfizer Australia in Senate hearings today. Senator Gerard Rennick on fire as he forced them to admit they didn’t understand the mechanism by which the vaccine causes myocarditis/ pericarditis. So much for trusting the science. They have no idea!!

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

God forbid anyone mention the word transmission to Pfizer Australia because they refuse to acknowledge it. They were unable to provide Senator Matt Canavan with any evidence to support Albert Bourla’s claims that the vaccine would prevent transmission. The fundamental basis upon which all mandates were issued has no evidence to support it. Warning this clip is excruciating to watch.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

Pfizer Australia refuses to acknowledge that MRNA technology is gene therapy. Despite the fact that Pfizer admits gene technology includes transfection which is part of the vaccine process. They refused to answer whether any potential claims would be indemnified by the Australian Government.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

https://www.aph.gov.au/News_and_Events/LiveMediaPlayer?vID=%7BD159C121-C022-482C-B146-DF50BE8E82DC%7D&mibextid=Zxz2cZ Full hearing is worth a watch.

Maintenance Page – Parliament of Australia Maintenance Page aph.gov.au

@cryptopunkard - Crypto Punkard

@SaiKate108

@burnelll - Laurie Burnell

@SaiKate108 One out of 35 people is rare?

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

@SaiKate108 It’s like watching bots trying to answer a question that’s not in their FAQ database.

@The_Chris_Bell - Chris Bell

@dystopian_DU @SaiKate108 Or an episode of Fawlty Towers where the first lie gets covered up but 50 more.

@GRUFOR2 - Grufor 🐂 🟠

@SaiKate108 FUCK PFIZER DOGS < FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD > ITS NOT EVEN A VACCINE!!!!!!! FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD FRAUD

@finaxe - Mario Fréchette

@SaiKate108 🐀🐀 ♨️♨️ 👌

@Crash_the_Flash - Crash_the_Flash 🐭

@SaiKate108 Health authorities around the world CONTINUE TO LIE… God bless you, Senator! They knew exactly what you were asking.

@CHDC2983 - Charles Charles

@SaiKate108 Pfizer witness would be held in contempt of court for obfuscation, evasion and refusal to answer direct and reasonable questions and would be eviscerated by a top advocate, barrister or trial lawyer regardless of the jurisdiction. Class actions the way forward everywhere.

@ablindeye007 - JohnHagan

@SaiKate108 It is all coming apart. The jab affects the bodies immune system permanently and any illness or infection in the future. Such was and still is the advice by those scientists and medical professionals who were silenced in the first instance.

@angelovalidiya - Lidiya Angelova, microbiologist, PhD

@SaiKate108 Medical doctors don't study molecular biology, they study how to sell drugs. The list I made is enough to cancel any use of so called COVID-19 vaccines and any mRNA or other gene products but instead being stopped these products are promoted. Why? https://genuineprospect.com/2023/07/25/covid-19-vaccines-adverse-reactions-science-evidence/

COVID-19 Vaccines Adverse Reactions Science Evidence Scientific studies show that COVID-19 vaccines cause adverse reactions and death. COVID-19 vaccines were pushed into widespread use without adequate long-term clinical trials. genuineprospect.com

@JaniceW78256134 - JusticeWillPrevail

@angelovalidiya @SaiKate108 Quite correct and in week 1 at med school the pharma reps are there, providing free cheese and wine to the 18 yr old naive students. Gotta get them onside young.

@Shak00r96 - Akbar Shakoor

@SaiKate108 It seems to affect the brainstem too which could be why ppl are dropping dead from their hearts stopping. The brainstem controls things like unconscious breathing and heartrate etc

@GeraldAdamsIWV - Gerald Adams

@SaiKate108 it is getting harder and harder for them to explain how they got richer, and everyone is dropping like flies, so they grasp for logic that really is not real...

@LindaJo46384842 - livinginthematrix

@SaiKate108 So these are the so called experts we were supposed to listen to???

@amrice62 - ann marie rice

@SaiKate108 Slime

@HeartBeatsCare - HeartBeats Care

@SaiKate108 @reSeeIt save thread

@john_bumblebee - Jan B. Hommel

@SaiKate108 They didn't. We still don't.

@Warcrimereport - METATRON LEVENDI🐭🇦🇺🇿🇦🇱🇧

@SaiKate108 He used the word therapy

@ImSooooOverIt - I'm So Over This! 👸💘

@Warcrimereport @SaiKate108 👍

@MoodAngelATX - MoodAngel.eth 🟪

@SaiKate108 🦄 💩 ☑️

@LetConst - Paul Vardy

@SaiKate108 One more thing, we know, very roughly, the mechanism of how the vaccine can induce myocarditis. The idea that "Dr. Threw(?)" does not understand this is highly unlikely. I explained, very roughly in another X post:

Paul Vardy on Twitter “@mark3415 @gillx83 @TexasLindsay_ I can absolutely sympathise with that point of view. The trouble is I've been looking into the mRNA tech since the beginning of all this, and it's just not ready. Knowing what I know, personally I would be afraid of vaccinating that little girl. When you get covid, your immune…” twitter.com

@julesserkin - jules serkin

@SaiKate108 - @MRobertsQLD

@Rikkoroo - XRPfaithful

@SaiKate108 @GetVideoBot

@GetVideoBot - GetVideoBot

@Rikkoroo @SaiKate108 Video? Here we go: https://getvideobot.com/video/1687020049734017024 Ad: Follow @CrazyVideoClips for crazy and viral videos.

@LetConst - Paul Vardy

@SaiKate108 "I was referring to the benefit risk ratio, and Health authorities around the globe continue to recommend the benefits..." oh wow. No money == "no longer recommend", right? Covid is no longer a threat to human kind. We no longer need this vaccine. Just give it up already.

@Vomit911 - Michigan Chemtrails

@SaiKate108 BS...They knew...Murders..!

@HuonHoogie - Huon H

@SaiKate108 Who is the chair??? Also a flog

@JoChristianse13 - Jo Christiansen

@SaiKate108 Tried to hide their Study Documents for 75 years.......

@paulbentleymelb - Paul Bentley 😷

@SaiKate108 @GetVideoBot

@GetVideoBot - GetVideoBot

@paulbentleymelb @SaiKate108 Yes! video is ready: https://getvideobot.com/video/1687020049734017024 Ad: Follow @CrazyVideoClips for crazy and viral videos.

@KobieOne01 - KobieOne aka HEXLOCKER

@SaiKate108 @threadreaderapp unroll

@threadreaderapp - Thread Reader App

@KobieOne01 @SaiKate108 @KobieOne01 Hello, please find the unroll here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1687020049734017024.html Talk to you soon. 🤖

Thread by @SaiKate108 on Thread Reader App @SaiKate108: A tough day for Pfizer Australia in Senate hearings today. Senator Gerard Rennick on fire as he forced them to admit they didn’t understand the mechanism by which the vaccine causes myocarditis/ pericar...… threadreaderapp.com

@LetConst - Paul Vardy

@SaiKate108 "Pfizer is aware of very rare reports of myocarditis..." Really? Apparently 1 in 35 vaccinated get myocarditis. Not so rare. "...being temporarily associated.." again, myocarditis is not like having a cold. It has long term implications.

Inversionism on Twitter “This is the highest quality paper ever produced on myocarditis risk post vaccination. https://t.co/yOmDTEyVM0 The debate is unironically over. With this paper, on top of the numerous others and the mountain of anecdotes and examples with the never ending stories of athletes…” twitter.com

@ablindeye007 - JohnHagan

@SaiKate108 I want to know how much money he gets paid for introducing a experimental jab into a large percentage of the Aussie population without being (or being) aware of the consequences. Rather like some people wanting to introduce sex education to young children without consequences.

@PJBottoms4 - PJB “We fight for our freedom, for our children”

I also suspect they don’t understand the mechanism because they simply don’t have the desire to investigate it preferring to be willfully blind and just obscure the relationship or downplay it. There’s a cynical old pharma saying I heard years ago… what do you do when you find your drug causes liver enzyme elevations (substitute any bad adverse event for this). Stop testing (or looking) for it… 🙄😔😢

@twocentsoz - Ari

@SaiKate108 Slippery drg dealers

@Blue22Dave - Dave W. Palmer, CD

LET'S NOT MINCE WORDS! WAS THE COVID EVENT A PLANDEMIC? 1. Was it planned by Wealthy Elites? 2. Was the intent of the vaccine to exterminate humans? 3. While yes this probably man-made disease did kill people, was the disease and the vaccine designed for that purpose? CONTINUES ---> 4. Do the people deserve the TRUTH? 5. If this is actually true, Who deserves to be held accountable? 6. Was the Nuremberg Code violated by any government in the forcing or mandatory need to be vaccinated? 7. Will we, the Citizens of the world protect honourable Whistle Blowers? 8. Truthfully, if that's a possibility anymore; Were the Elitists of the WEF, the UN and the WHO involved in trying to ensure all humanity was vaccinated with these vaccines ? If so, WHY? 9. Is there unreported evidence that the vaccine has severe and detrimental side effects, including but not limited to: Sudden Death, Heart Issues, Strokes, Bells-Palsy, Blood Clots and other associated health issues! 10. If there was a Conspiracy by any Person, Persons or Organization, or group that were found responsible; "Would The World Court initiate appropriate action to deal with this matter?" CITIZENS OF THE WORLD, ALL OF US WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT WHAT THIS COVID EVENT WAS REALLY ABOUT! They made their beds, now it's time to face the music!

@JEM_Books - STELLLLLLLAAAAAAA! ✝️📖🇺🇸🤺

@SaiKate108 But they did understand the mechanism and did it anyways. This let’s them off easy.

@gu_ru_bi - Jing Gu

@SaiKate108 Is it fair to say financial fraud uncovered by the royal commission a few years ago is a lot less egregious then these health services professionals

@menschmodus - menschmodus 🚜

@SaiKate108

@lekiend - Dimitri Lekien 🇧🇪🇫🇷

@SaiKate108 @ezdubs_bot English French

@ezdubs_bot - EzDubs

@lekiend @SaiKate108 @SaiKate108 @lekiend Done! Here is your French dub: https://ezdubs-vod-api.com/result/1687020049734017024_en_fr 📺🔴 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙏𝙪𝙗𝙚: bit.ly/3WUC0iq 💬🟢 𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙨𝘼𝙥𝙥: https://bit.ly/3NbkOne 📱🔵 𝙏𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙢: https://t.me/ezdubs_bot

EzDubs Business Account api.whatsapp.com
ezdubs_bot You can contact @ezdubs_bot right away. t.me

@Vettecrazed - Karen

@SaiKate108 How disgusting 🤢

@kbit2323 - Lizzy

@SaiKate108 Temporary???? You’re effing kidding me? My son still has it 2 years on. This is an effing joke

@PrimalDaoist - The Primal Daoist's Renaissance Salon

@SaiKate108 Of course they don’t understand what causes myocarditis They think viruses and other germs cause disease!

@Bgkaster - BGKaster (Brenda)

@SaiKate108 Lies.

@tenennessy - Tenennessy

@SaiKate108 @ezdubs_bot english spanish

@ezdubs_bot - EzDubs

@tenennessy @SaiKate108 @SaiKate108 @tenennessy Done! Here is your Spanish dub: https://ezdubs-vod-api.com/result/1687020049734017024_en_es 📺🔴 𝙔𝙤𝙪𝙏𝙪𝙗𝙚: bit.ly/3WUC0iq 💬🟢 𝙒𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙨𝘼𝙥𝙥: https://bit.ly/3NbkOne 📱🔵 𝙏𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙜𝙧𝙖𝙢: https://t.me/ezdubs_bot

EzDubs Business Account api.whatsapp.com
ezdubs_bot You can contact @ezdubs_bot right away. t.me

@Thomas_Binder - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD

@SaiKate108 Autoimmune attack against the foreign antigen expressing cells can induce inflammation of any organ. Myocarditis is diagnosed more often than other inflammation as there's a sensitive/specific marker, inexistent for other organs & sudden death is striking.

Dr. Thomas Binder, MD on Twitter “#modRNAgenocide Why the whole mRNA "vaccine" platform must be prohibited immediately (The two fundamental flaws of the m[od]RNA "vaccine" platform - even if the LNPs and the foreign antigen are not toxic, and there is no relevant contamination with functional DNA or with whatever…” twitter.com

@rn_lilydale - RNLilydale 🐭

Well no wonder the risk/benefit ratio is “conveniently” in their favour when Australian doctors are STILL refusing to link known & documented side effects with their 💉💉💉I know ppl that have died and are permanently disabled by the 💉💉and they CANNOT get a doctor to admit or consider that their condition or death is associated with their 💉💉uptake. It’s criminal!!

@ImSooooOverIt - I'm So Over This! 👸💘

@SaiKate108 This is just ridiculous. This is science today 🤦🏼‍♀️ Inventing climate change and the ridiculous theory invented behind it means all of 'science' has to be equally for spastics. I imagine this is fine for the lefties - probably even a little too wordy for them 🤦🏼‍♀️

@amrice62 - ann marie rice

@SaiKate108 I think there should be an inquiry/database on HOW MANY PFIZER KIDS, PREGNANT WOMEN and adult males took this vaccine.

@CptnSafemoon - Capt Grove

@SaiKate108

@miros2424 - Miroslaw Sowa

@SaiKate108 The same way the cigarette companies did not undestand how cigarettes cause cancer.

@LetConst - Paul Vardy

@SaiKate108 They "retain confidence, strong confidence in the safety profile of the vaccine..." their data handed to the CDC in the USA indicated more people died in the control group than the placebo in 2020; in Dec 2020 the CDC lied and said "there were no deaths from the vaccine". Liars.

@MoonMilk64 - ⭐️💜🇺🇸🎃MoonMilk64🎃💜🌙🇺🇲

@SaiKate108 It's almost like they're not aware of how science works. You question and test, not worship like a god that poisons the masses

@PrydePoet - Pryde

@SaiKate108 Generally don' get onboard with the Nuremberg 2.0 chant but for this guys and those like him still recommending these shots after the mountain of scientific evidence showing unequivocally the shots are neither safe nor effective ... these folks do indeed deserve prison.

@Blue22Dave - Dave W. Palmer, CD

LET'S NOT MINCE WORDS! WAS THE COVID EVENT A PLANDEMIC? 1. Was it planned by Wealthy Elites? 2. Was the intent of the vaccine to exterminate humans? 3. While yes this probably man-made disease did kill people, was the disease and the vaccine designed for that purpose? CONTINUES ---> 4. Do the people deserve the TRUTH? 5. If this is actually true, Who deserves to be held accountable? 6. Was the Nuremberg Code violated by any government in the forcing or mandatory need to be vaccinated? 7. Will we, the Citizens of the world protect honourable Whistle Blowers? 8. Truthfully, if that's a possibility anymore; Were the Elitists of the WEF, the UN and the WHO involved in trying to ensure all humanity was vaccinated with these vaccines ? If so, WHY? 9. Is there unreported evidence that the vaccine has severe and detrimental side effects, including but not limited to: Sudden Death, Heart Issues, Strokes, Bells-Palsy, Blood Clots and other associated health issues! 10. If there was a Conspiracy by any Person, Persons or Organization, or group that were found responsible; "Would The World Court initiate appropriate action to deal with this matter?" CITIZENS OF THE WORLD, ALL OF US WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT WHAT THIS COVID EVENT WAS REALLY ABOUT! They made their beds, now it's time to face the music!

View Full Interactive Feed