reSee.it - Related Post Feed

tzimmer_history
Posted - February 16, 2023 at 4:51 PM
Saved - February 17, 2023 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The cancel culture and antiwokeism moral panics invert the balance of power, portraying marginalized groups as powerful and elites as needing protection. The reactionary crusade against wokeism and cancel culture is fueled by anxiety over increased scrutiny and criticism of societal elites. Traditional power structures have held up fine, but the threat to elite impunity is real. The renegotiation of norms surrounding public speech and expression is messy, but necessary to prevent continued elite dominance and impunity. The real question is where is the line and who gets to draw it. The assault on marginalized groups is escalating, yet antiwoke crusaders focus on protecting elite free speech.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

The “cancel culture” and anti-“wokeism” moral panics rely on a complete inversion of the actual balance of power, portraying traditionally marginalized groups as mighty forces that urgently need to be reined in – and those in elite positions as desperately in need of protection.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

It’s an unbelievably cynical game: Some of society’s most vulnerable groups – trans people, for instance, whose fundamental rights, including their right to exist in the public square, are being stripped away – are presented as a dangerous, powerful cabal.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

In a way, the New York Times recently elevating an unhinged anti-“woke” crusader like Pamela Paul is actually useful: In everything she writes, the cynical inversion of  power is dialed up to 11 – which gets you to “In defense of JK Rowling.” It’s not gonna get any more obvious.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

Think about how silly this is: “Oh, the woke militants dominate everything over there!” – when the New York Times has just hired staunchly conservative David French to join the existing stable of famous anti-“woke” columnists like Pamela Paul, Bret Stephens, and David Brooks.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

The only “persecution” that is happening here is David French being criticized online. Some of that criticism may even be unfair or cross the line – the internet is a nasty place. But that’s it. No one is firing or “canceling” him. No one in a position of power is doing anything.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

In this way, this whole affair captures the anxiety that fuels the reactionary crusade against “wokeism” and “cancel culture”: Societal elites - and elite white men, in particular - face a little more scrutiny and public criticism today than in the past. And they don’t like that.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

As soon as traditionally marginalized groups gained enough power and acquired the technological means to make their demands for respect and their criticism heard, traditional elites started bemoaning “persecution” - “The hordes are coming to cancel us!”

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

Important to note that it’s mostly the *threat* of scrutiny, the *potential* of being held to account that is enough to cause the next round of reactionary panic. In practice, the power structures that have traditionally defined American life have unfortunately held up just fine.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

These moral panics appeal to (predominantly white, predominantly male) elites because the threat to elite impunity is real - “cancel culture” and “wokeism” may have made it slightly more likely that people get in trouble for racist, misogynistic, disrespectful behavior.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

Simply put, elite life in the public spotlight has become slightly more uncomfortable, at least for elites who used to be able to get away with absolutely everything and now they (potentially) don’t anymore. People like David French and Pamela Paul get more public criticism.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

The reason is that traditionally marginalized groups have forced their way into the conversation, necessitating a re-negotiation of norms surrounding public speech and expression. That process can be messy at times - but the alternative is continued elite dominance and impunity.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

Everyone agrees that certain transgressions, certain public speech should be met with shaming or shunning. The real question is: Where is the line, and who gets to draw it? Traditionally, this was the prerogative of a predominantly white, predominantly male elite.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

This prerogative has come under fire. And if you believe - as much of America’s traditional elite evidently does - that you are entitled to say and do whatever you want without legal or cultural sanction, that you are actually entitled to unconditional affirmation, that’s bad.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

Think about how cynical, how utterly vile this is: “No right are being ‘stripped away.’ None.” As red states have introduced *hundreds* of anti-trans bills, passing ever-more extreme anti-trans laws every week. What an unbelievably disingenuous bigot this man is. Despicable.

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

So many people proudly taking the Sullivan “You’re just making stuff up” line in my responses. When this, below, is what’s happening across the U.S.   There is no plausible deniability for this level of willful ignorance or bigotry. You’re just telling the world who you are. https://t.co/A0fsqQiF9H

@tzimmer_history - Thomas Zimmer

As the reactionary assault on one of the country’s most vulnerable, most marginalized groups is escalating, anti-“woke” crusaders are focused on the real threat - elite “free speech”: “Famous billionaires need our protection! Famous NYT columnists are being persecuted!” Perfect.

Miriam_Grossman
Posted - June 28, 2023 at 5:43 PM
Saved - June 29, 2023 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a medical professional, I initially aimed to combat diseases like cancer and schizophrenia. However, I've come to realize that my greatest challenge lies in combating dangerous ideologies. These beliefs deny the biological reality of gender, leading to risky medical interventions on children. Such ideas mock scientific progress and cause immense harm to young individuals and their families. I've witnessed heart-wrenching stories of children being taken away and put on hormone treatments against their will. There are also cases of individuals regretting irreversible procedures and women experiencing premature menopause due to reproductive organ removal. These atrocities are happening, and it's crucial to protect our loved ones from becoming victims.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

🧵 1/ When I graduated from medical school, I took an oath. I stood up, raised my right hand, and vowed to prevent disease whenever I could. At the time, I expected to go to war against cancer and schizophrenia.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

2/ But after forty years, I’ve realized my most challenging fight is not against deadly diseases, but deadly ideas.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

3/ The beliefs that man and woman are human inventions; that the sex of a healthy newborn is arbitrarily and often incorrectly “assigned”; and that as a result the child requires “affirmation” through risky medical interventions

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

4/ -- these ideas are divorced from reality and therefore hazardous, especially to children. They are, in fact, a mockery of 21st century science, and cause immeasurable harm to young people and their families. I know, because I’m a psychiatrist and they’re my patients.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

5/ I don’t have the words to describe the sorrow of parents I know whose young daughter was removed by a government agency, placed in foster care, and started on testosterone. Their crime? Insisting she’s a girl.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

6/ Or the anguish of a young man I see, who sought castration to become his “authentic self” and now, after the fact, regrets it. Or the rage of a twenty-something woman going through menopause due to “gender affirming” removal of her reproductive organs.

@Miriam_Grossman - Miriam Grossman MD

7/ Are these atrocities really happening in our country? They sure are, and you must protect your loved ones from joining the multitude of victims.

TwisterFilm
Posted - August 20, 2023 at 1:04 PM
Saved - August 21, 2023 at 11:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jazz Jennings, hailed as an icon by the trans lobby, has faced a tragic journey. Medical interventions have left Jazz sterile and unable to have a sex life. Mermaids, a UK lobby group, played a role in this. Jazz's story raises questions about coaching and the true nature of gender dysphoria. The use of puberty blockers, advocated by Mermaids, may not benefit the majority of kids. Blockers have cognitive impacts and worsen dysphoria. Jazz's surgeon admits that sexual function is compromised. The show "I Am Jazz" portrays a passionless existence. The plight of these mainly gay teenagers is a tragedy, highlighting the irony of a movement that once championed sexual freedom.

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

1./ The truth about Jazz I've written in @spikedonline about Jazz Jennings who the trans lobby claims is an icon. But his medicalisation has left Jazz sterile, mutilated and unable to have a sex life. Jazz isn't an icon of our era. He's a victim 1 of /11 https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/08/20/the-tragedy-of-jazz-jennings/

The tragedy of Jazz Jennings The reality-TV star's story is a terrible indictment of so-called gender-affirming care. spiked-online.com

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

2./ Jazz is just one of hundreds of victims of the UK lobby group Mermaids whom Jazz's mother first consulted. She then took Jazz to see Marilyn Volker, a therapist who had been a sex surrogate. She had sex with her clients, and even married one of them. World class care, eh? https://t.co/UnqU46mZ4D

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

3./ Could Jazz's story have been a grift from the start? I stumbled upon this clip where Jazz introduces himself using his original name, Jaron, 2 years after he was supposed to have socially transitioned. Then he looks at the person who's filming as if he's being corrected. https://t.co/JBNUZ8CAkE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, I'm Karen and I want to share my story. On my birthday, I got a sewing machine and made my first fabric mermaid tail. I loved it and wore it every time I went swimming. It was a magical experience.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Karen, and I'm gonna be making a video. Will you So on that same birthday, I ordered a sewing machine. I bought some fabric, and I created my 1st fabric mermaid tail. It was a beautiful tale. I loved it so much. It was like my little baby I would wear every single time when I swam in the water, and it was just a magical experience.

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

4./ Jaron then says, "You can call me Jazz". It's almost as if the boy is being coached and isn't suffering from what his mother described as traumatic gender dysphoria. Or at least could have easily overcome it. Is the truth Jaron was just an effeminate little boy all along?

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

5./ At a conference in 1998 a Mermaids speaker admitted only a third of children exhibiting gender dysphoria "will grow up to be transgendered adults". Over a half would be gay, she said. And that was 25 years ago, before trans became the cause du jour! gender.org.uk/conf/1998/merm…

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

6./ Once puberty blockers became available Mermaids became Britain's foremost campaigners for their use. But if only a third of kids with dysphoria will become trans adults, two thirds of the kids who get medicalised are not receiving any so-called "benefit" from blockers.

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

7./ Even those who may become "trans" are being harmed. The cognitive impact of blockers appears to be major and irreversible. Young animals on blockers become more anxious and withdrawn. The Tavistock found they made gender dysphoria worse in many kids.

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

8./ Marci Bowers, Jazz's surgeon, has admitted that no child who goes on blockers at the "recommended time" will ever be able to sexually function properly or orgasm. Yep, thousands of kids are being deprived of their birthright to become a sexual adult. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuwOx9YdHXY&t=103s

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

9./ In 'I Am Jazz' producers have tried to engineer romances but at 21, Jazz has had only 3 brief, Platonic "affairs", one kiss, and no sex. In the latest series this is what passes for passion: a stilted chat about how unique Jazz is. Jazz has been exiled to a sexual desert. https://t.co/yPvh2Gelcr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I had a great time tonight. You're really cool and interesting. You're unique, which is amazing. Most people aren't that unique or don't want to be, but you embrace your uniqueness. I admire that about you. Be the weirdo, dude.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you had fun tonight? Oh, yes. I love it. Yes. I'm having so much fun tonight getting to know you though. Yes, you're really cool. I think you're really cool too. Too. You're interesting. You're different than most people. You're unique, which is amazing. I mean, I do believe everyone's unique, but You're actually unique. Well, you know what? More power to you. I I would argue and say most people aren't that unique or most people don't want to be unique. So they try to be They try to limit themselves, but you, on the other hand, are not limiting yourself. You're embracing your uniqueness, so I admire that about you. Weirdo. I know it. Yeah. Be the weirdo, dude. Exactly.

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

10./ Why are so-called "trans kids" put through all this pain? Do parents and doctors harbour a strange subconscious disgust for effeminate boys and butch girls? How else to explain the glee of Jazz's mum when she recalls how she threatened to "dilate" her teenage son's fauxgina. https://t.co/knpLtQrnP1

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm concerned about her mental well-being and her ability to maintain her dilation routine. Once she leaves my house, there's a risk of her reverting to old patterns. I once woke Jazz up and handed her the dilator with lubrication, telling her to use it or I would do it for her. But even when I'm home, she neglects it. I'll be furious if she goes to college and neglects her routine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With her, I'm worried about, like, her mental well-being and her dilation. The minute she leaves my house, we have a dilation problem. That is a concern. We don't have that watchful eye. They tend to go back to old patterns. I had woken Jazz out of a dead sleep and taken the dilator and put the lubrication on it and said, here, you take this, do you put it in your vagina, if not, I will. But Jazz is bad even when I'm home once a day. I will be so mad if she goes away to college and that thing fills up. Like

@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark

11./ Isn't it ironic that gay rights -which began as a movement championing sexual freedom- has been taken over by a cult that now sterilises mainly gay teenagers, robbing them of ...sexual freedom? It's one of the great political own-goals and for victims like Jazz ..a tragedy.

BillboardChris
Posted - September 16, 2023 at 7:30 PM
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 6:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Union representatives from across Canada are organizing counterprotests against those who oppose gender ideology. They claim that opponents are fascists and Nazis. The Canadian Labour Congress passed a resolution to create flying squads within unions. Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, has been exposing the gender identity agenda since 2010. Teachers unions and schools are promoting the idea of childhood sex changes. Simpson criticizes public service employees for participating in partisan activities. The BC Federation of Labour has released plans for counterprotests. The author expresses gratitude to union bosses for raising awareness about child abuse. A protest is scheduled in Toronto on September 22nd. The author emphasizes the need for professionalism and non-engagement with Antifa. The author plans to hold another protest in Maryland on September 26th. Support for the campaign to end child abuse is appreciated.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Reps from 130 unions across Canada held a Zoom call yesterday. They’re organizing counter-protests so they can fight back against those of us who don’t want to sterilize kids. They repeatedly call us fascists and nazis and all the usual hyperbolic nonsense. These people represent every union in Canada. 4 million Canadians are paying for this through their union dues. Some crazy lady starts talking about our last protest in Ottawa at the 34-minute mark. https://vimeo.com/864819489/2cd0e05e22

Sept 15, 2023 Union organizers counter protests This is "Sept 15, 2023 Union organizers counter protests" by RoadKill Radio on Vimeo, the home for high quality videos and the people who love them. vimeo.com

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

The Canadian Labour Congress passed an emergency resolution at their May 2023 convention to create "flying squads" within unions to counter pushback against drag queens and gender ideology.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, acquired the above video and various documents, and has been exposing the gender identity agenda since 2010.  Note that this started during the Conservative government under Stephen Harper, with his endorsement of the UN's move to sexualize kids and empower the trans movement.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Here’s PowerPoint presentation used during the meeting of union bosses.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Here is the Ontario Federation of Labour’s email to members, helping them organize counter-protests for the various marches across Canada on the 20th, and my school protest in Toronto on September 22nd.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

The Ontario Federation of Labour says you are part of the ‘ultra-conservative right’ if you object to childhood sex changes.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Teachers’ unions and schools everywhere are doubling down on teaching kids that they might be born in the wrong body. They celebrate the idea that children need to change their bodies to find true happiness.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Kari Simpson, President of Culture Guard, has released this statement. “It is contrary to the code of ethics and values of public service employees to participate in political partisan activities while employed as a public servant.  “I will be sending a ‘shot across the bow’ letter to the Clerk of the Privy Council, and all the provincial ministers in charge of overseeing the public service.”

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

The BC Federation of Labour has released their plans for counter-protests.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

I would like to express the biggest thanks possible to all of these union bosses. You do amazing work alienating your own members, and are helping to wake up millions to this child abuse. My activism wouldn’t be nearly as successful without you. 🫶🏻

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

See you all in Toronto on Friday, September 22nd. Come early. The counter-protestors will try to block us and tend to get themselves arrested, ensuring even more media attention.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it every time any future protest is held. No profanity on signs, no F Trudeau signs, no upside-down Canadian flags, no engaging with Antifa. If you want to act like a hooligan, this is not the protest for you. You are free to organize your own. This is outside two schools. Be a professional. Don’t give the left what they want. If you can’t turn the other cheek, do not come.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

The day after my Friday, Sept. 22 school protest, I’m off to Maryland for another one outside Gaithersburg High School on September 26th. I’ll also be visiting Johns Hopkins University for conversations with students.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

If you wish to support my campaign to end this child abuse, I cannot thank you enough. billboardchris.com/donate

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Please give this a listen and learn the tactics of the left at protests. ⁦@ConceptualJames⁩ is 100% right. They exist to get a reaction out of you. Don’t give it to them. https://open.spotify.com/episode/6Lt1snNtQ5RxemWvtVZYcJ

Page not found open.spotify.com
BillboardChris
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 5:04 AM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 5:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canadian Conservative MP @Shelby_Kramp, a trans activist, raises concerns about the party's silence on child abuse. It's time for conservative voters to acknowledge the reality and question the party's true intentions. Actions speak louder than words.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

This is Canadian Conservative MP @Shelby_Kramp. She’s a trans activist. Tell me again, conservative voters, how the Conservatives are smart to stay silent about this cult. Tell me again how it’s just a tactic to get elected, and THEN they will suddenly stop the child abuse. https://t.co/TEIhFamfGt

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

When people show you who they are, believe them. https://t.co/6aQkqKzZJU

NormalGuy223
Posted - September 25, 2023 at 1:27 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canada's government is being criticized by international observers for various reasons. All 338 Members of Parliament support mass immigration, gender ideology, and refuse to speak out against childhood gender reassignment procedures. They also push for net-zero carbon, gave standing ovations to a Nazi and Zelensky, and support endless funding and weapons for Ukraine. Additionally, they have failed to push back against lockdowns and vaccine mandates for two years. Canada's reputation has suffered as a result.

@NormalGuy223 - Joe Blo

I think many international observers are waking up right now to how much of a joke Canada's government really is. Let me summarize how bad it is for them: Canada has 338 Members of Parliament that "represent" the population. 1. All 338 support mass immigration. 2. All 338 support gender ideology. 3. All 338 refuse to speak out against childhood gender reassignment procedures. 4. All 338 push net-zero carbon. 5. All 338 gave a standing ovation to a Nazi. 6. All 338 gave a standing ovation to Zelensky. 7. All 338 support endless billions of dollars and weapons to Ukraine to prolong the Ukraine War. 8. All 338 refused to push back against lockdowns and vaccine mandates for 2 years. Canada has turned into a WOKE JOKE.

MaximeBernier
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 5:18 PM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 9:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Law professor and digital economy expert @mgeist warns that Senate bill S-210, supported by Conservatives, NDP, and Bloc, may lead to increased internet censorship and mandated face recognition. The Liberals oppose the bill, but its true intentions remain unclear. This raises concerns about the Conservatives' support for politically correct bills without considering the implications, as seen with C-4. The bill's sponsor, @karen_vecchio, is known for supporting gender ideology and the radical trans movement. Trust in the Conservatives to protect fundamental rights is questioned.

@MaximeBernier - Maxime Bernier

According to law professor and digital economy expert @mgeist, the Conservatives, with support from the NDP and Bloc, are pushing for adoption of a Senate bill, S-210, which under the guise of restricting underage access to inappropriate content opens the door to more Internet censorship, as well as mandated face recognition and age-approval requirements for everyone in order to use popular sites and social media such as X. Bizarrely, the Liberals for their part oppose the bill. So what’s its ultimate goal? To prevent kids from accessing porn, or to bring more internet censorship and control? Nobody in Ottawa seems to clearly know. What’s behind this legislative mess?? Is this another example of the fake Conservatives being drawn to support a bill that sounds politically correct without thinking through all the implications? That’s what they did when they voted for C-4 with all the other parties thinking they were outlawing abusive conversion therapies for gays, but ended up also criminalizing parents who rightfully oppose gender transitioning their child. Interestingly the MP sponsoring S-210 is @karen_vecchio, who is also notoriously supportive of gender ideology and the radical trans movement. This shows once again that you CANNOT TRUST the fake Conservatives for one moment to protect your fundamental rights.

@MaximeBernier - Maxime Bernier

Link👇 https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2023/12/the-most-dangerous-canadian-internet-bill-youve-never-heard-of-is-a-step-closer-to-becoming-law/

The Most Dangerous Canadian Internet Bill You’ve Never Heard Of Is a Step Closer to Becoming Law - Michael Geist After years of battles over Bills C-11 and C-18, few Canadians will have the appetite for yet another troubling Internet bill. But given a bill that envisions government-backed censorship, mandates age verification to use search engines or social media sites, and creates a framework for court-ordered website blocking, there is a need to pay attention. Bill S-210, or the Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act, was passed by the Senate in April after Senators were reluctant to reject a bill framed as protecting children from online harm. The same scenario appears to be playing out in the House of Commons, where yesterday a majority of the House voted for the bill at second reading, sending it to the Public Safety committee for review. The bill, which is the brainchild of Senator Julie Miville-Dechêne, is not a government bill. In fact, government ministers voted against it. Instead, the bill is backed by the Conservatives, Bloc and NDP with a smattering of votes from backbench Liberal MPs. Canadians can be forgiven for being confused that after months of championing Internet freedoms, raising fears of censorship, and expressing concern about CRTC overregulation of the Internet, Conservative MPs were quick to call out those who opposed the bill (the House sponsor is Conservative MP Karen Vecchio).  michaelgeist.ca
EvaVlaar
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 9:06 PM
Saved - February 22, 2024 at 11:02 PM

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

🇨🇦 Christian persecution is about to be introduced in Canada: If passed, Bill C-367 could land Christians in jail for quoting the Bible or expressing a faith based opinion if the Canadian government deems it “promotion of hatred or antisemitism”. This is an absolute disgrace. https://t.co/Bq8zT8N3J9

ezralevant
Posted - February 29, 2024 at 6:29 AM
Saved - February 29, 2024 at 11:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new bill in Canada adds speech as a form of discrimination, making it a future crime. Anyone can file a complaint against you, even if they're not a victim, and potentially receive $20,000 per complaint. The process is the punishment, and complainants can remain anonymous. This could become an industry to financially ruin individuals and silence dissent. @RebelNewsOnline is also at risk. Sign the petition at StopTheCensorship.ca.

@ezralevant - Ezra Levant 🍁🚛

Here’s how they’re going to get you, @jordanbpeterson. For years the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) has banned discrimination against people based on “gender identity or expression”. You of course have never discriminated against anyone. But this new bill adds s. 13 to the CHRA, which now says that mere speech is considered discrimination if it is “likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group”. So now, if someone watches one of your YouTube videos or reads on of your tweets about, say, transgender athletes changing in the girls change room, and as a result is “likely” to have hard feelings towards trans people, that’s hate speech. That’s step 1. Here’s step 2. Any member of the public (including non-citizens) can lodge a complaint against you to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal — an activist quasi-judicial tribunal run by non-judges, appointed by Trudeau. They can get up to $20,000 per complaint from you — and they don’t have to be the “victim”. (There doesn’t have to be a victim at all — remember it’s a future crime. They only have to show that your tweet or video is “likely to” (i.e might) cause one person to have hard feelings about another person. $20,000 that you’d pay the complainant — plus $50,000 in fines to the government. Per complaint. So there could be a new complaint for every tweet you make. Every video. And the complainants can be professional busybodies and activists — they don’t have to be a “victim”. Why wouldn’t woke activists literally file a CHRA complaint after every single thing you do or say on social media? It’s free. There’s no limit. Even if you “win”, you lose — the process is the punishment. And of course, they’re going to win. This will become an industry — to enrich woke grifters and destroy you financially. But here’s the truly amazing part: the complainants can keep their identity a secret from you. Secret testimony from secret witnesses — who get paid up to $20,000 to take a run at you. That’s how they’re going to come for you — and for us at @RebelNewsOnline. See screenshots. 1. Source: https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-63/first-reading 2. Sign our petition at http://www.StopTheCensorship.ca.

Government Bill (House of Commons) C-63 (44-1) - First Reading - Online Harms Act - Parliament of Canada Government Bill (House of Commons) C-63 (44-1) - First Reading - Online Harms Act - Parliament of Canada parl.ca
Stop The Censorship The Trudeau government has unveiled the largest censorship plan in Canada which aims to silence everyday Canadians on social media platforms — they must be stopped! Follow along on this page for all of our coverage. rebelnews.com

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Excellent! Retroactive crime! Thanks @JustinTrudeau That's an evil I hadn't considered before! Sincerely, Satan 👿 @ezralevant

rustyrockets
Posted - March 6, 2024 at 10:11 PM
Saved - March 7, 2024 at 8:13 PM

@rustyrockets - Russell Brand

With Canada’s new 'online harms' bill set to make online hate punishable up to LIFE in prison, is Trudeau's C-63 bill about protecting children or about labelling any speech he personally dislikes as hateful? https://t.co/vTaoIE0oMs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Justin Trudeau's proposed bill in Canada aims to address online harms, including hate speech and child exploitation. However, critics argue that it could be used to silence dissent and control information. The bill would hold online platforms accountable for harmful content and establish a censorship organization. It also introduces stricter penalties, including life imprisonment, for hate offenses. Trudeau's government has been accused of authoritarianism and limiting freedom of speech. Similar legislation is being introduced in other countries, suggesting a coordinated global effort. Critics fear that these laws could be misused to impose control on the population and suppress dissent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Justin Trudeau's new c 63 bill will allow the Canadian government to imprison people for life in order to protect children or to imprison political opponents. What do you think Justin Trudeau and the globalists are more interested in? Justin Trudeau and the globalist, which proposes that in order to, you know, protect children. And this mainstream media news broadcast seems to suggest the elderly, I don't know, they need to be protected from. Is there a movement? Help children. Are there geriatric rings now? Although also in weird crazy cuckoo project Canada, there are new ideas to euthanize people for being sad, poor, or old. So, really, the elderly need protecting mostly from Justin Trudeau. What's going on in the who is Justin Trudeau protecting us from except bloody Justin Trudeau? That's who I wanna be protected from. Let's get into this story because whether it's Ireland or the United States or, in particular, Canada, there are new laws that seem predicated upon impeding free speech. Let's have a look. Speaker 1: Internet safety is a subject talked about in most households Speaker 0: Is it? Speaker 1: Especially with vulnerable family members. Speaker 0: Too hard to grab my household. What's going on with these weird new laws to censor people and shut down dissent? Is there anyone worth voting for anywhere in the world? Speaker 1: Especially with vulnerable family members, young kids, or seniors. Speaker 0: Seniors? Don't worry about the elderly. Don't worry about my dad. Dad, what you do, actually, he should be Speaker 2: in control of what he Speaker 0: puts on you. He's a pain in the ass. But generally speaking, the elderly aren't the issue, are they? What they're doing and what they generally do is present a situation where they are our protectors in order to take our power and security. It's such an obvious scheme now. They're such grifters. It's so plain. I can't believe we continue to believe it. Speaker 1: The Liberal government is hoping its long promised online harms bill will help protect people. The latest version is set to be introduced tomorrow. Speaker 2: The Liberals' long awaited online harms bill will be introduced Monday. Speaker 0: Biden keeps saying it's long awaited, long promise. Where's that online homeschool quick, my children? Won't somebody please think of the children? That's not the actual issue. You're a person. Trust yourself a bit more. Trust your own instinct and evaluation of your own life. What are your problems? Is it resources? Is it expenses? Is it a crisis of meaning? Is it sort of despair? Is it total distrust and breakdown of society and culture? Is it a kind of weariness from dealing with the deluge of information from people that are telling you that they're protecting you from misinformation that appears to be oddly untrue, like this. Speaker 2: The latest in a series of sweeping and controversial Internet regulations. Speaker 0: Things shouldn't be sweeping and controversial at the same time. If you're gonna sweep some ink, make sure everyone bloody well agrees with it. Speaker 3: We need to make sure, and I think we can all agree, we need to protect our kids, online. Speaker 0: Justin Trudeau with his various issues should not be wearing black leather gloves. I suppose it's good that it's on the hand rather than the face, given that it's Justin Trudeau, but it's a bit too gestapo for someone who literally awards Nazis in parliament and evokes unnecessary emergency acts, isn't it? Speaker 2: The proposed bill is aimed at online companies. Speaker 0: They've got a hooded figure that looks like them people that Nick C-3PO and RTD2 in the first Star Wars film. Speaker 2: And expected to target hate speech, terrorist content, child exploitation, and the sharing of nonconsensual images, both real and AI generated. Speaker 0: I bet some of those things there are already laws for. Like, firstly, aren't there? Like, terrorism, I think, is already illegal. I think they're already not supposed to be a pedophile. They aren't real required laws. This is what we're going to do is legitimise censorship by offering you things that you'll agree with like you want your children safe, you don't agree with hatred and you don't agree with terrorism. Yep. That's everyone in the world thinks that except for for small marginal lunatics and then they're gonna use that to go that was critical of, for example, the trucker protest. Look at their actions and look at what they actually care about. They care about being out of freeze people's bank accounts, care about being able to unperson and shut down dissenting voices and seize control of the media. Obviously, what the agenda is. This is absolute bunk. Speaker 2: All with a significant focus on child safety. The conservatives say it's an attempt to censor Canadians, while others hope for even stronger digital protections than those expected in the bill. Speaker 0: Do you know one of the penalties is life imprisonment? How much stronger could you go than life imprisonment? Justin Trudeau will come around your house and strag you to death in those black gloves of his while singing Speaker 2: Swanny. Swanny. Legislation like this already exists in several other countries like the UK, Australia, and the EU. Speaker 0: What a coincidence. Almost as if these bills are being passed everywhere, as if it's some sort of coordinated global effort. Now look, you could say more materially and more skeptically Speaker 3: if you Speaker 0: want to be all reasonable about it that the pandemic was a global problem and so having a global response to a global problem is one interpretation and the Internet is a global phenomenon. So having a global response is in some ways sensible. As long as that response is absolutely derived from referenda. As long as it's the response that people want. I mean, as a parent at the moment, when I think who do I want in charge of protecting my children when it comes to online safety and basically, actually, all forms of safety, me. That's who's in charge of it. Me, my wife, and people I trust. It's not like Justin Trudeau. Get your gloves on. The kids are playing up. I don't want them lot involved in any way. Obviously, the reason that we are concerned about this raft of legislative measures across the world, Ireland, our country, the UK, Canada, EU, as it was listed in the news report, is because of the potential to misuse these laws to impose control on the population of the country. The people that are really regarded as terrorists, we know this because they use techniques, personnel, agencies, technology that have previously been used on terrorists on domestic populations now. It's common. It's global. It's ubiquitous. A good example of a domestic population being treated as terrorists is January 6th. Was that a protest or was it an insurrection? Certainly, people have done pretty lengthy jail sentences, in some cases, for simply practicing their right to protest and maybe going a bit over the edge. Speaker 4: Well, a decision from a federal appeals court could potentially affect the sentences of dozens of January 6 rioters. Now the court ordered a new sentence for a man from Grapevine who stormed the Capitol, saying a judge wrongly applied an enhancement that made his sentence longer. The US attorney's office says that same enhancement has been applied in more than 100 other January 6 cases. Speaker 0: What this story essentially is is that the law, even as written, has been misused in this instance, and people have served undue sentences. Really? Because they want to make an example of people, didn't they? They've realized, hold a minute, if this demographic, like working class, blue collar people, significant portion of the population becomes disobedient, we got a serious problem because guess what? We need those people to be in our police force. We need those people to be in our army. We need those people to control themselves. So we better really make an example of them. I'm reminded of about 10 years ago in this country, there were riots and there was a load of looting and stuff like that. And what was weird is they started in London as response to the death of a man in police custody in Tottenham, North London, but then they sort of spread and they were happening all over the country. So it's almost like this discontent had a kind of contagion or meme appeal. And I think part of the function of these systems that we're currently losing our faith in, the institutions of democracy and media are about ensuring that we don't all spontaneously just go, none of this is working, idiot. Should we start really playing up? So whenever something a bit off color happens like January 6th or the rights in my country, the institutions fire up. Suddenly, they work really quickly. If you ever tried to get a permit to, like, I don't know, cut a tree or mend something or get some tax that you owed, we'll be back to Speaker 3: you in 6 to 12 to 18 months. If you could write to this person, if you Speaker 0: could fill in a form. Try filing a Freedom of Information Act request. See how long it takes for the government to tell you how much they've been spying on you as I've been doing lately. It ain't like, right. Here you go. This information. Let's go make it rain. Start breaching a few velvet ropes in the capital. Suddenly, the institution of government moved pretty quickly. So Canada introducing and applying for these new laws. Ireland asking for these new laws. UK passing these laws. EU wanting to pass these laws. It tells you something. They're gearing up to control you. Speaker 4: If the ruling stands, defendants who have not completed their prison terms may push for new sentences. Speaker 0: He's not doing so many favors. He's dressed up a little bit but, hey, if dressing up was a crime, I'll tell you who won't be in prison, Justin Trudeau. Canada's justice minister, Arif Virani, has advanced a highly controversial bill named Bill C63, 63 proposing comprehensive new legislation aimed at addressing online hate speech. The bill covers 7 types of harmful material from content sexually exploiting or revictimizing children and survivors to content promoting violence and extremism, but it also outlaws online hatred, so called hate speech, and forms of deepfakes. Also they're doing the classic bureaucratic bunch together, where they take something that anyone would agree with. For example, if there is a requirement for new legislation to children, I'm sure everyone, except for some real, let's call them out there characters, will be totally down with, yeah, laws to protect children from predators and menace. Get those laws done. But notice how they bunch it together with, like, hate speech. So while you're looking at this, we all agree with, they just push through on the slide. Also, we don't want anyone criticizing Justin Trudeau or the use of the emergency act or the freezing of the bank accounts or the tendency towards globalization and the inability for countries to democrat. That's what's interesting and important. Let's separate the issues at the front of this, like child safety, from some of the issues like free speech. In an attempt to decrease the prevalence of harmful content, this legislation puts the onus on online platforms to be accountable and transparent about how they handle such content. Platforms like social media and live streaming services are included under the legislation's online services umbrella. Oh, live streaming. You've noticed that, have you? Like, there's a new emergence of a new phenomena. They're like, oh no, there's whole new markets. This is probably related to the total collapse in trust and use of legacy media outlets. They're realizing, oh, no. It's moving quicker than we can. Quick. Trapp it. Stomp it down. Censor it. Control it. Surely. The bill would also create a new stand alone hate crime offense that would apply to every offense in the criminal code and in any other act of parliament, allowing penalties of up to life imprisonment to denounce and deter this hateful conduct as a crime in itself, the briefing explained. Well, that is actually confusing. Stand alone hate crime offence that would apply to every offense in the criminal code. So it seems to me like they created a bit of legislation that seems quite diffuse, oddly amorphous, and could be applied, it sounds like here, to any other law. Also, you did that hate crime. It sounds like they're trying to find ways to shut down dissent and control information, which is obviously something we're seeing a lot. The proposed law would also raise the maximum punishments for the 4 hate offenses from 5 years to life imprisonment for advocating genocide and from 2 years to 5 years for the others when persecuted by way of indictment. It's interesting that there's a new law being introduced. Like, people might say stuff or type stuff about a genocide but that isn't the same as doing a genocide and given that we are living through what many people regard to be a genocide right now, why the hell are Canada more interested in people advocating for genocide than people actually committing them. If you're doing a genocide, get your missiles, get your missiles. You don't even have to pay actually because we'll make money by replenishing our previous stocks. And if people Speaker 3: are saying, oh, those people should be stamped out, like, so which isn't the Speaker 0: kind of thing that's very nice to say, there's something that gets said and I don't think should carry a life sentence. The Liberal government states that the bill's proposed regulations center on the platforms most frequented by Canadians. However, the specifics will depend on whether these platforms meet the eventual user thresholds. Over time, the government may hold other platforms accountable if these platforms end up posing a significant risk of harm. So they've built into it the possibility that people are just gonna stop using that platform. It's over regulated. Start using this one. We're on a platform that is free speech absolute and that platform therefore suffers unduly. That's why you should support us on that platform. That's where we make our daily content. That's where you can support us become a member. Additionally, Bill C 63 proposes establishing a censorship organization which will oversee digital safety issues. Oh I bet they will. Where are they gonna draw those people from? How is it going to be funded? What will their tastes be? What their inclinations and political affiliations be? We just know that we've lived through the 2 most censored events in history, the COVID-nineteen pandemic heavily censored incorrectly, it has been retrospectively admitted. Speaker 3: Kind of establishment on that, you know, asked for a bunch of things to be censored that in retrospect ended up being more debatable or or true. Speaker 0: And the current ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia and its mysterious origins, not to suggest again, as I always say, that the Ukrainian people dying in a war is a terrible thing but the fact is is information is already being heavily controlled, if you facilitate that further you're playing into the hands of a system that's already heading in that direction. Highlighting the Trudeau government's actions during the pandemic, Polleyev remarked Justin Trudeau that anyone who criticized him during the pandemic was engaging in hate speech. This statement underscores a fear that the governments might use the proposed legislation to silence dissent in various scenarios. I think that's almost inevitable. What Trudeau's doing in Canada should terrify everyone in the western world who cares about being free from government tyranny, censorship and disinformation. That's because Trudeau is pioneering a new way for governments to take control over the information environment, spreading disinformation, and demanding censorship that is similar but different to efforts we are seeing in places like California, Australia and New Zealand. It's truly a global issue. It appears to be built around a pre agreed global structure. No doubt when they have these conferences, wf for example, agreements like this are refined, suggested and a kind of consensus is agreed upon, otherwise why would this be happening? People across the western world were rightly alarmed when Trudeau invoked for the first time in Canadian history the emergency measures act and froze bank accounts of people who had simply donated to the truckers cause. Trudeau's crackdown on the Freedom Convoy protesters was followed by efforts to regulate and control the Internet. His online streaming act and online news act gave the government expansive new powers to regulate what happens and what you see online. The atmosphere created by Trudeau and his party is completely upending Canadian society, Speaker 3: leading to the persecution of his detractors and limiting speech and expression. Speaker 0: If we persecution of his detractors and limiting speech and expression. If we see more laws like this, we will see more problems like this. And as we keep illustrating and reiterating it's happening everywhere. Have you not noticed that our politicians seem similar, seem to have a similar agenda, seem to be funded in similar ways, seem to have comparable interests even right down to their hobbies, haircuts, dress sense and global conferences that they attend. In looking to defend minorities and promote culture, Trudeau's Liberals are everything they once feared. They are authoritarian, anti democratic, anti liberal. And what's happening in Canada is not separate from what's happening in the US, the UK, Europe and Brazil, but intimately connected to those nations. Trudeau isn't so different from President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, governor Gavin Newsom, and most other Democrats in the US. The difference is is that he's ahead of them. Yes. And if you consider say the truckers protests and then consider the events of January 6th and even something like the burgeoning support among truckers in New York, these, I imagine, are actually the issues that they would like to address with new legislation. I actually don't think they care that much about protecting your children. Certainly, there are many rumors that there are many in the political class that have the exact opposite view. According to Justin Trudeau and his Liberal Party supporters, he and their party are the party of compassion for vulnerable people, freedom, and Canadian culture. Liberals care in their view while conservatives don't care. Trudeau has proclaimed his loyalty to the United Nations declaration of human rights and the Canadian charter of rights and freedoms. And when the Liberals introduced their social media reforms legislation, they said the goal was to promote Canadian culture, ensure the sustainability of the news industry, and guarantee we heard from marginalised voices. But a government cannot claim to care about the vulnerable or about freedom while freezing the bank account of a single mother working on a minimum wage job as Trudeau's government did. Nor can the government claim to care about the vulnerable or freedom while trying to regulate the internet to prevent further protests and challenges to Trudeau's government. Trudeau constantly splits the population into liberal angels and conservative devils You either believe in liberal climate policy or are a climate denier according to Trudeau. You either mask up and vax up or are putting lives at risks. You either support the radical demands of trans activists or you hate sexual minorities. Trudeau's actions aren't about social progress. They're about power and control. Trudeau embodies many of the traits of left wing authoritarians. All authoritarians support censorship and submission. They tend to believe this is necessary because in their minds, the population is naive and cannot be trusted. Perhaps this focus on children is an unconscious declaration of the more deep intent at play. But we are all regarded as children insomuch as we are denied the right to true autonomy in the way that a child has to be protected, in the way that any parent would take personal responsibility if they can for the welfare of their children rather than deferring that to the state particularly when it seems that the state do not truly understand the power that they're playing with and in whose hands they are truly placing this power. When they create diffuse laws that bundle together the safety of children online, the elderly online, when they're not euthanizing them at the first sign of sniffles, and their control and removal of hate speech, which impedes on rights which are necessary in democracy when they say that democracy is the thing they prize above all else. So do these new laws in Canada protect you or do they prevent you from being autonomous and free, having free speech and your rights as an adult citizen. Do these laws that are being passed across the world that bear very similar inflections and contain very similar clauses that are similarly diffuse and could be similarly exploited, indicate that whether you are in the United States of America or Brazil or the UK or Ireland, you are now being subject to new measures of control precisely because in these online technologies, we have the ability for new true diversity Speaker 3: Rumble.
laralogan
Posted - March 7, 2024 at 3:32 PM
Saved - March 8, 2024 at 4:27 AM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

These people are insane. Canada’s attorney general justifies arrests for ‘thought crimes’ under Trudeau’s Online Harms Act | The Post Millennial | http://thepostmillennial.com https://thepostmillennial.com/canadas-attorney-general-justifies-arrests-for-thought-crimes-under-trudeaus-online-harms-act

Welcome thepostmillennial.com
Canada’s attorney general justifies arrests for ‘thought crimes’ under Trudeau’s Online Harms Act Trudeau’s Online Harms Act would place people under house arrest if accused of plotting to commit a hate offense. thepostmillennial.com
shellenberger
Posted - March 11, 2024 at 7:54 PM
Saved - March 11, 2024 at 8:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new hate speech law proposed by Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau aims to protect children online. However, critics argue that existing laws already address child exploitation. The proposed law would allow judges to impose life sentences for speech crimes, which some view as an infringement on free speech. The Online Harms Act (Bill C-63) has been criticized as totalitarian and illiberal, setting a concerning precedent for censorship. Supporters argue that it aims to create a safer online space. The legislation has sparked debates about the definition of "advocating genocide" and the potential for misuse of power.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

A new hate speech law is required to protect children online, says Canada's @justinTrudeau. But it's not. Harming kids is already illegal. And now, Trudeau's government has confirmed to Public that the law would allow judges to send people to prison for speech crimes — for life.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Trudeau Demands Life In Prison For Speech Crimes Shocking crackdown by Canada’s Liberal Party also seeks incarceration for crimes that haven’t been committed by Stephen Moore @recoveringprog Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau attends a press conference after the closing session of the G20 summit in New Delhi on September 10, 2023. (Photo by Money SHARMA / AFP) (Photo by MONEY SHARMA/AFP via Getty Images) To protect children from sexual exploitation, Canada must pass the Online Harms Act, says Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government. “I am the parent of two young boys,” said Justice Minister Arif Virani. “I will do whatever I can to ensure their digital world is as safe as the neighborhood we live in. Children are vulnerable online. They need to be protected from online sexual exploitation, hate, and cyberbullying.” But Virani’s bill is totally unnecessary to protect children. Its real goal is to allow judges to sentence adults to prison for life for things they’ve said and for up to a year for crimes they haven’t committed but that the government fears they might commit in the future. As such, Trudeau and Virani’s Online Harms Act (Bill C-63) is the most shocking of all the totalitarian, illiberal, and anti-Enlightenment pieces of legislation that have been introduced in the Western world for decades. The Liberal government’s censorship legislation, when considered in the context of Trudeau’s sweeping abuse of governmental powers during and after the Covid pandemic and new subsidies for government propaganda, sets a new watermark in rising totalitarianism in Western societies. In an unusually long statement in response to a series of questions asked by Public, the Trudeau government’s “Canadian Heritage” department, which regulates the media, tried to ease our concerns.  “Bill C-63 is meant to bolster the rights of Canadians to express their thoughts and opinions,” said the anonymous official, “by creating a safer and more inclusive online space.” But a Canadian government spokesperson went on to confirm the shocking truth about the legislation, which is that it would put people in prison for life for things they’ve said, specifically, “advocating genocide.” “Bill C-63 would increase the maximum penalty specifically for advocating genocide from 5 years to life imprisonment,” said an unnamed spokesperson for the Canadian government, “and from 2 years to 5 years, on indictment, for the willful promotion of hatred (section 319 of the Criminal Code)” [emphasis added] This means someone who writes something that a government official decides is “advocating genocide” will face a longer maximum sentence than someone who rapes a child. And what might count as “advocating genocide”? Today, there are prominent politicians around the world who say that supporters of Israel are advocating the genocide of the Palestinian people and that supporters of Hamas are advocating genocide against Jewish people. Imagine if they were in power. Under Trudeau’s legislation, would they not be able to send their political enemies to prison for life? ...

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting and to read the rest of the article! https://t.co/ixNhRWIQw0

ContrarianTribe
Posted - March 19, 2024 at 12:45 PM
Saved - March 19, 2024 at 1:11 PM

@ContrarianTribe - Contrarian

🇨🇦This is why Trudeau’s Online Harms Bill can never be allowed to pass in its current form! It’s not about protecting children it’s about power and control over speech. Do Canadians not see this?🤔

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

https://t.co/3Vj6pcTa4I

Video Transcript AI Summary
The First Amendment exists because people came from countries where they couldn't speak freely. Freedom of speech is crucial for democracy, as without it, there is political coercion. The United States has strong protection for speech compared to other countries, like Canada. Preserving freedom of speech is essential, as it is the foundation of democracy. Without it, there is nothing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That there's a reason, that we have the the first amendment, and there were that that that it's it's important to think about that. Why does it exist? And it exists because, people came from countries where they could not speak freely, where if they if they did if they did speak their mind, they would be imprisoned or killed. That's that's why they were so so concerned, about freedom of speech is because they didn't have it in the countries they came from. And in many places in the world, maybe most places, you don't have freedom of speech. And, you know, there's certainly no country has the protection on speech that the United States does. Not even not even in Canada. So that's, it's something we should really, take pride in and, and seek to preserve. I I mean, I think that the the the bedrock of democracy is freedom of speech, because if if you can't if if you can't, say what you wanna say, then I think that's essentially political coercion if if you you know? So, anyway, there's there's a reason why it's there there was a high urgency to amend the constitution with the first amendment, was because if you if you don't have freedom of speech, you got nothing.
JoshWalkos
Posted - April 1, 2024 at 1:42 AM
Saved - April 1, 2024 at 4:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A 14-year-old girl posed as a transgender individual and obtained a testosterone prescription within 9 minutes at a private clinic in Quebec, as revealed by an investigation conducted by CBC. The incident raises concerns about the medical industry's profit-driven motives and potential risks faced by children. For more information on the dangers of the puberty blocking drug Lupron, refer to the linked article.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The absolute state of Canada 🇨🇦 A 14-year-old girl walked into a private clinic in Quebec, said she was trans, and was given a testosterone prescription in less than 9 minutes. The only problem was that the girl was an undercover actor for the CBC.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 14-year-old girl was quickly prescribed testosterone at a pediatric gender clinic in Quebec after self-diagnosing as trans due to online influence. The CBC's investigative report on this led to trans activists vandalizing their headquarters and issuing a statement defending the right to experiment with their bodies. The activists prioritize personal autonomy over the well-being of vulnerable youth being pushed into transitioning. The situation escalates as activists threaten further retaliation against any perceived transphobic reporting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most amazing part of this story is that the CBC did this. They did an incredible piece of investigative journalism, like real journalism. They sent a 14 year old actress undercover into a pediatric gender clinic somewhere in Quebec. She told this story, it's filmed, and she tells this story to the doctor. She has an eating disorder, and she went on YouTube or whatever, and she came across a trans influencer who also had an eating disorder, but realized that they were trends, and that's why they had the eating disorder. So then they transitioned, and everything was wonderful, and then problem solved. They feel great about themselves. She's telling this story to the general clinician. Within 5 minutes, the clinician has asked her if she wants a mastectomy. Within 7 minutes, I think there's talk of a hysterectomy because internal organs can trigger dysphoria. And within 9 minutes, she's got a prescription for testosterone. No parents there. This is a 14 year old girl telling the story that she basically self diagnosed as trans because she saw someone online. So incredible piece of journalism, great article that came out with it. And then trans activists, a couple of weeks later, smashed the windows of the CBC headquarters in Montreal. And then they released this statement to Bunkers, totally crazy statement. That we basically we have the right to experiment in our bodies, even if it's even if we make a mistake, we have the right to make these mistakes. You, the state, should not be interfering, and then a whole lot of absolutely outrageous accusations about the far right. And if you carry on reporting like this, this transphobic reporting, we will fight back again. There will be further retaliation. That's what the statement says. But bear in mind, what they are responding to, They're responding to a story about a 14 year old who was put on testosterone after 9 minutes, and she basically told the doctor that she came to that conclusion online, and she has an eating disorder. So that is what why they smashed the windows because they think that 14 year old should have the right to experiment as she sees fit, even if it means making That is actually what they're responding to. Of course, they're looking at it through their own very selfish lens of, I want to be able to modify my body however I choose. I want the state to pay for it. We don't want state interference, but we do want the state to fund it. And I don't care about the 14 year old girl. They they have no concern for the collateral damage, which is all of these young kids who they are just getting sucked into something way bigger than they understand. They're just interpreting their normal teenage angst and pubital woes as being a sign that they are transgender. And then crazy doctors like this one in Quebec give them a prescription for testosterone. But these activists are sort of they've already smashed windows. They're threatening retaliation. And this is only the beginning.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Link to the investigation: https://youtu.be/QXNOsxpP2ow?si=RNykE9GWFYQC_pgY

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

An article about it: https://tnc.news/2024/03/07/quebec-teens-rushed-into-gender-transitions/

Quebec teens being rushed into gender transitions, CBC investigation finds Young teens in Quebec dealing with gender dysphoria are being rushed into irreversible gender transitions, despite activist claims to the contrary. tnc.news

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I wrote about the history and dangers of the puberty blocking drug Lupron here if you’d like to learn more:

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is my newest article for @wrongspeakpub exposing the horrors being inflicted on children by adults for obscene profits. This one is important. “If history teaches us anything, it’s that the medical industrial complex’s voracious appetite for easy profits knows no bounds, and it has shown a willingness to sacrifice a generation of children, setting them up to be at risk of sterilization, osteoporosis, and a host of life-long debilitating conditions that will require even more pharmaceutical interventions” https://www.wrongspeakpublishing.com/p/the-drug-sacrificing-the-heath-of

The Drug Sacrificing the Health of a Generation of Children Despite It’s Troubling Past Despite its troubling past that is laden with corruption, it continues to be used off-label. wrongspeakpublishing.com
jordanbpeterson
Posted - June 1, 2024 at 6:16 PM
Saved - June 2, 2024 at 1:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dear @JustinTrudeau and @liberal_party, Pride is not a celebration of love but of pride. It excludes those who are not part of the LGBTQ+ community. The government should not be involved in this. Enough of the pride celebrations, the ever-extending acronym, and the "gender-affirming" movement. There is no true coalition or community within the LGBTQ+ community. #PrideSeason #Pride2024

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Dear @JustinTrudeau and @liberal_party: The celebration of casual hedonistic self-centered sex is not the celebration of love. The celebration of casual hedonistic self-centered sex is not the celebration of love. Pride is not a festival of love. It's a festival of pride. That's why it's called Pride. I believe people when they say what they mean. And now it's a whole bloody season. Not a parade. Not a day. Not a week. Not a month. A season. Why? Because self-absorbed narcissists have no limits. The outer edge of no limits is where the real monsters live. A warning.

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Furthermore Pride is not inclusive. It excludes everyone who is not part of the bloody rainbow brigade, and purposefully. It excludes everyone sensible enough to keep their private lives private.

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Finally: The government has absolutely no business involving itself in any of this. None. Even @JustinTrudeau's almost equally reprehensible father said and so famously "There is no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation."

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Enough bloody pride. Enough pride in the banks. Enough pride in the churches. Enough rainbows on the streets. Enough of whatever the hell that flag purports to be. Who keeps designing and changing that demented rag, anyway? Who decides that it's time for yet another one, even though it changed last month? Who decides where and when it flies, and why? Some secret cabal of dog-mask-wearing S and M aficionados and moralists? And enough of the ever-extending idiot acronym that only the propagandized insiders can even remember LGBTETC Enough of that And seriously enough of the "gender-affirming" butchers and liars (and there are few lies currently circulating bigger than that term and everything it represents). The "gender-affirming" movement will be the death first of the gay community, which never was a "community," by the way, so that's yet another lie. So there's no coalition at all on the LGBTETC, much less a "community." There is instead an internal battle there that is far worse than anything the LG types faced back when the only thing they had to worry about was Christian conservatism. At least no one was being castrated or subjected to unnecessary mastectomies in those bad old days.

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Meanwhile in @JustinTrudeau 🇨🇦 A missive from our head of state: https://t.co/QTVxglkA8O

@CanadianPM - CanadianPM

As festivities and events kick off #PrideSeason, we continue to stand with 2SLGBTQI+ communities and allies and work toward building an inclusive future where everyone is free to be who they are and love who they love—openly and proudly. #Pride2024 https://t.co/JWNBjitXS1

MaximeBernier
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 12:44 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 1:23 PM

@MaximeBernier - Maxime Bernier

.@CBCKids is brainwashing our children with this disgusting and dangerous radical gender ideology, and ensuring more of them will become confused, mentally unstable and suicidal. CBC is a criminal organization. https://t.co/aOFzijkoAG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi baby, determining sex at birth is based on body parts. Sex is physical, while gender is how you feel inside. Sometimes sex and gender don't match. You can be a boy with a penis or a girl with a vulva. Gender doesn't dictate what you like. It's okay to be yourself, regardless of stereotypes. Your feelings determine who you are. Embrace your uniqueness as you grow up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, baby. Are you a boy or a girl? Speaker 1: Funny you should ask, Sid. 1 of the first things they check when a new baby is born is what kind of body parts they have. They do that to determine a baby's sex. Most of the time, it's easy to determine and sometimes it's more complicated. This 1 has a penis. It's a boy. This 1 has a vulva. It's a girl. Congratulations. Woah. Let's hit the brakes, people. The way your body looks on the Hi, little 1. Your sex refers to your physical Hi, little 1. Hi, yeah. Hi, guys. Your sex refers to your physical body parts, remember? But there is also something called gender, which is how you feel inside your body and who you know yourself to be. And your gender, how you feel on the inside, doesn't always match the sex you recalled when you were born. Okay. Let's say you were born with a penis and you feel like a boy inside. In that case, your sex and your gender match. But what if you Speaker 0: were born with a penis and you know you're a girl inside, not a boy? Speaker 1: Then your sex and your gender don't match. Speaker 0: Wait. What does know you're a girl inside mean anyway? Does that mean you have to love pink things and princesses? Speaker 1: Nope. Sometimes people refer to things as girl things and boy things, but this is just how people sometimes classify things usually to make it easier to sell stuff to kids and their parents. Clothes, toys, and games are for everyone. You don't have to be a boy or a girl to like a certain thing. Sid, has anyone ever told you that you shouldn't play with something or wear something because you're a boy? Well, yes. The body parts you were born with don't always dictate who you are, how you feel, or what you like to play with. Speaker 0: That's such a relief. Speaker 1: Gender, how you feel and who you know yourself to be, tells you who you are, and there are a whole bunch of possibilities. Figuring out what feels right for you is just part of growing up. Bye, little cutie. You might want to change that diaper sooner than later.
BillboardChris
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 3:36 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my outrage about Adam Laboucan, a man who committed horrific crimes and later identified as trans, receiving government-funded breast implants and being placed in a women’s prison. When I raised this issue with NDP members, they dismissed my concerns and laughed, making me feel unsafe. I believe the only solution to what I see as trans madness in British Columbia is to vote out the NDP and elect a Conservative government. I also want to correct my earlier statement: the boy he drowned was actually 3 years old, not 6 months.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

A BC man named Adam Laboucan, who raped a three month old baby and drowned a toddler, later decided to identify as trans. Our government paid for him to get breast implants, and transferred him into a women’s prison. When I told this to members of our NDP government, they told me I was making them feel unsafe, and kicked me out of their campaign headquarters. As I walked back to my car, I looked through the windows of their building and what were they doing? Laughing. @GraceALore and her fellow NDP members think that’s funny. The only way we will ever stop trans madness in British Columbia is when we vote out the NDP, and get a Conservative government in place. The NDP is a party of trans activists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the need to address child abuse and dangerous policies in British Columbia. Speaker 1 recounts being kicked out of the NDP headquarters for raising concerns about a violent criminal transferred to a women's prison. They emphasize the importance of voting out the NDP and promoting conservative values for a return to sanity in the province. The conversation highlights the challenges of discussing controversial topics and the need to change the culture to ensure all voices are heard and valued.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I appreciate speaking with you, Chris. My name Speaker 1: is Dean. Thank you, Dean. Nice to talk to you. Speaker 0: Nice to talk with you. Speaker 1: Alright. I'm heading down in this bay. Okay. So I'll Speaker 0: be around. Speaker 1: I'll Speaker 0: do some shopping. So Okay. Thank you for your work. I know you're very well known. You're very well respected. I've seen you on YouTube. Thank you so much for what we do. Speaker 1: My pleasure. Someone's gotta do it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Oh, yeah. That's true. That's true. These are dangerous times because they're confusing times. People are confused. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: They don't know and and they think a lot of people when they're in fear, they figure, well, I better go along with whatever the government says. I'm way I'm safe. Yeah. So they think. Speaker 1: Yeah. And if anyone speaks up about this issue, the the left will say, oh, they're anti LGBT, and that silences conversation. But we should be able to talk about anything in society. When children are coming to harm, lifelong harm, we really need to talk about that a lot. So that's all I'm doing is having conversations. Speaker 0: Yeah. But but I I would really encourage you to to stop by Spencer's office with your son. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a good idea. Speaker 0: And see what could be done. I mean, it could've maybe a little late in the day today, but Speaker 1: Yeah. I've spoken to some NDP members. I actually went into the NDP campaign headquarters in Victoria last election cycle, and I spoke with Grace Lohr, who's now the minister of state for child care. Speaker 0: That's right. What name? Speaker 1: Grace Lohr. Speaker 0: Grace? Speaker 1: Yeah Grace LORE, l o r e. Speaker 0: Oh Lord. LORE. LORE. Yeah. Okay. Thank you. Speaker 1: But I I laid out everything for about 10 minutes and 1 by 1 everyone in this room fell silent. And then I got to this part of my my spiel where I mentioned how there's this man in British Columbia who raped a 3 month old and murdered a 6 month old, drowned What? And he now identifies as a woman. What? The province of British Columbia paid for him to get breast implants, and they transferred him into the Fraser Valley Penitentiary for women where, of course, he's assaulted a woman. So I told them all this stuff and all about this child abuse. And do you know what their reaction was? They kicked me out because I was making them feel unsafe. Speaker 0: Oh, that's cool. Speaker 1: And as I was walking back to my car, I kid you not, after that story, I'm walking back to my car. I looked through the window. They were all laughing. So that's the NDP. They don't care. I've even mentioned this story on Twitter and I've tagged Grace Lohr about this man, this murderer sent to a women's prison. And she responded. You know what she said? I stand with the trans community. So, honestly, talking to these people is like beating your head against a brick wall. It's not gonna do anything. We need to vote them out. Speaker 0: They're not listening and they're you see, they that last statement you repeat then is a safe statement for that person to make. Like, the the, so Grace Lau, she's an NDP. Speaker 1: Yeah. She's NDP. She used to be and I didn't know this at the time when I was talking to her. Yeah. Because I literally just I was going back to my hotel at night. I've been out on the street Victoria all day, and I stumbled upon this NDP campaign headquarters. I could see all the political posters. And the minister of education was also campaigning out of that building, and I really wanted to talk to him. He wasn't there. His campaign manager was. But I ended up talking to Grace for 10 minutes. And she just sat there quietly stood there quietly while I said everything. And I found out afterwards she had been the gender studies professor at the University of Victoria. So she's just an activist is all she is. And there's honestly absolutely no point trying to reason with the NDP. They cannot be reasoned with. We have to vote them out. So the United Party has no chance of winning. We need them to collapse. We really need them just to fold, and we need people to vote conservative because that's the only way we're gonna get back to sanity in this province. Speaker 0: But, the statement like I stand with this trans community, see, that that's a very safe statement for a politician to make. Right. Very safe. Speaker 1: They think so. Speaker 0: Well, the oh, yeah. Speaker 1: They're gonna learn that it's not. Speaker 0: The yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Speaker 1: We're gonna change the culture so that it becomes not. Yeah. Speaker 0: Thank you, Chris. Yeah. Make it make it so it's not a safe statement to make. And, but I would say if anyone said didn't feel safe around me, I said, well, you know, you and I are both adults. Speaker 1: I'm literally having a calm conversation like I always do. She said it three times that they needed to make this a safe space, which is always Safe Speaker 0: for who? Speaker 1: Exactly. That's just code word for we only permit pro transgender talk around here. Speaker 0: But I I would say safe space, safe for who? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: I'd say it if you say it's some situation, they say, I don't feel safe. I'm an adult. I can take care of myself. Speaker 1: The women in that prison don't feel safe.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

I incorrectly stated in my conversation above that the boy he drowned was a 6-month-old. My apologies. The boy was 3 years old. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11750379/amp/Violent-trans-pedophile-raped-three-month-old-moved-female-prison-mother-baby-unit.html

Violent trans pedophile moved to female prison with mother-baby unit Laboucan was moved to a women's prison by 2017 after transitioning to a woman. While there he has reportedly stared at infants housed in a mother-child ward. dailymail.co.uk
jordanbpeterson
Posted - August 1, 2024 at 11:17 PM
Saved - August 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canada's actions regarding sterilization and medical experimentation are deeply troubling. I believe it’s a crime against humanity to subject those who cannot consent to such practices. The consequences of these decisions will inevitably return to haunt us.

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/opinion-its-time-canadian-medical-leaders-stood-up-to-gender-medicine Canada enables the butchers of children Like no other jurisdiction @JustinTrudeau: it is a crime against humanity to submit people who have or cannot consent to sterilization and medical experimentation This is EXACTLY what you have encouraged The chickens will come home to roost

Opinion: It's time Canadian medical leaders stood up to gender medicine We studied a myriad of gender transition policies in Canada and found that we are one of the most permissive, reckless jurisdictions nationalpost.com

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

https://t.co/HMUQgSjuNI

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

https://t.co/5ZGAjRyELK

MakisMD
Posted - August 28, 2024 at 11:56 AM
Saved - August 29, 2024 at 2:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the tragic story of nine-year-old Luciana Laine Nash, who collapsed and died on her first day of school due to cardiac arrest. This incident is part of a troubling trend, as many young children have died suddenly after receiving COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. I highlighted other cases, including a 15-year-old football player and an 18-year-old skier, who also suffered cardiac arrests. I expressed concern over the lack of accountability from authorities and the ongoing risks to children, emphasizing the need for informed consent and protection for our youth.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: Nine year old Luciana Laine Nash collapsed on first day of school at recess and died suddenly - "her heart stopped unexpectedly" - many young children are dying of cardiac arrests Hundreds of children have died after taking Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Canada. Thousands have died globally. Luciana's mom was very enthusiastic about COVID-19 Vaccines. In April 2021 she proudly posted on facebook: "I got my COVID-19 Vaccine". Some brainwashed moms who were victims of disinformation and propaganda, rushed to get their small children COVID-19 Vaccinated. Her 9 her old daughter, Luciana, dropped dead on the first day of school 2024. Cardiac arrest. Then seizures. Then brain inflammation. Then death. She died on Aug.13, 2024 at Riley Hospital for Children in Indianapolis. She had no risk from COVID-19. Aug.5, 2024 - Hopewell, Virginia - 15 year old football player Jayvion Taylor collapsed during football practice on August 5, 2024 and died suddenly. "the student collapsed about 10 feet from a coach. Two coaches were in the vicinity and immediately performed CPR and called 911...AED was used". Aug.11, 2024 - 18 year old Camilla Nygard, a Norwegian skier, died during a training session, from cardiac arrest Aug.13, 2024 - Palatka, FL - 15 year old athlete Robert James Gillon III died suddenly at home from a suspected cardiac arrest Aug.13, 2024 New Brockton, AL - 14 year old football player Semaj Wilkins, suffered a medical emergency early in football practice and died on Aug.13, 2024. This will keep happening because parents never spoke up when they should have. Here in Alberta, on June 17, 2024, @AlbertaUCP sponsored an event called "An Injection of Truth", hosted by @EricBouchardAB, where I presented on the 538 child deaths in VAERS after Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. Since then, Alberta Minister of Health @AdrianaLaGrange has publicly come out against protecting Alberta's children and in support of those who abuse, assault or traffick children. And Alberta Premier @ABDanielleSmith said she wants parents to have the choice to inject their kids with a toxic substance and without informed consent, while doctors remain illegally muzzled and under attack by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta @CPSA_CA. For speaking up for children, the College sent @EdmontonPolice to my house on Sunday afternoon on Aug.4, 2024 as a show of force and intimidation Children continue to be under attack in Canada and the US and the abusers of children continue to get protection from Institutions and governments. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access @TuckerCarlson @JoeRogan #DiedSuddenly

MakisMD
Posted - September 1, 2024 at 10:26 AM
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 11:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In August 2024, nine high school football players in the U.S. died suddenly, raising serious concerns about the potential link to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The tragic incidents included cardiac arrests and mysterious collapses, with dates and locations listed for each player. I question whether we should still be surprised by these deaths, especially after so many children have faced similar fates post-vaccination. I spoke out at a political event in Alberta, urging for informed consent and accountability, but the situation remains dire as children continue to suffer.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: Nine High School Football players "Died Suddenly" in the US in August 2024 - no one dares to mention COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine status or Vaccine injury BREAKING NEWS: August 2024 has been mired in tragedy as High School children who play football are dropping dead across the United States. Cardiac arrests. Mysterious collapses. Climate Change. NINE High School football players died suddenly and unexpectedly in just over 3 weeks in August 2024: Aug.5 - 15 yo Jayvion Taylor (VA) Aug.13 - 15 yo Robert James Gillon III (FL) Aug.13 - 14 yo Semaj Wilkins (AL) Aug.14 - 16 yo Leslie Noble (MD) Aug.14 - 14 yo Landon Payton (TX) Aug.16 - 15 yo Ovet Gomez Regalado (KS) Aug.24 - 16 yo Caden Tellier (AL) Aug.24 - 13 yo Cohen Craddock (WV) Aug.31 - Troy Moore (SC) ARE WE STILL SUPPOSED TO PRETEND TO BE BAFFLED? Is this where we are in 2024? After thousands of children have collapsed and died after taking Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines, are we still supposed to be surprised and baffled? Really? Parents, give them enough time and they will take each of your children, one by one. If it's not the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine, it'll be another injection. There was one politician in Canada who had a chance to be the hero and stop the carnage by halting COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in children. On June 17, 2024 I spoke at the @Alberta_UCP Political Event "An Injection of Truth", along with many famous MDs and PhDs. Unfortunately, Alberta Premier @ABDanielleSmith chose to allow the carnage to continue - by allowing the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta to continue to illegally suppress Informed Consent and threaten doctors, who are then forced to lie to parents about mRNA jabs being safe, when they're not. Where there is no Informed Consent, there is no choice. It is a lie to claim that "parents have a choice". Especially when doctors can only keep their jobs by lying to the parents. So instead, Alberta children continue to die, just like these children did - because everyone is too weak to do the right thing. Nine High School football players dead in just over 3 weeks. In any normal country, the Police would start their investigation by getting the child's entire vaccination history, especially COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL in the 1st photo at the top, into your browser to access @TuckerCarlson#DiedSuddenly

TheBuckYouWill
Posted - September 19, 2024 at 7:44 PM
Saved - September 21, 2024 at 11:51 AM

@TheBuckYouWill - The Buck You Will

SECOND READING - BILL C-63 - MONDAY SEPT. 23 The liberals are hell bent of pushing C-63 through. THIS CAN NOT HAPPEN. C-63 is a 'Trojan Horse' censorship bill that can jail ANY Canadian for life - for thought crimes! I am NOT being dramatic. This is scary '1984' type stuff. https://t.co/DmXHo4FQb4

tr6_guy
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 6:04 PM
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 6:48 PM

@tr6_guy - TR6Guy

🇨🇦 our government trying to pass Bill C-293 behind our backs IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. ALL 338 even those that voted against it in the HOC cuz they are silent. Yes that's you @CPC_HQ and @PierrePoilievre https://t.co/yDnFbavMMq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Health Organization (WHO) is urging countries to agree on transferring authority to declare pandemics and manage vaccine and drug procurement. It is suggested that collaborating with the Colombian drug cartel would be more beneficial, as they have expertise in drugs. During the COVID pandemic, the WHO is accused of spreading misinformation, with claims that there is no new virus and that effective vaccines are impossible. Assertions about vaccine effectiveness are labeled as false. The WHO is deemed more dangerous to humanity than the World Economic Forum.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like, shortly to, where are people from upcoming, danger for humanity. The World Health Organization wants all countries to sign an agreement on handing over the authority to declare a pandemic, procure vaccine and drugs. It will be healthier and safer for humanity to sign agreement with the Colombian drug cartel. They know all about drugs for sure. During the COVID pandemic, World Health Organization only told lies. It should be declared a terroristic organization. They lie. That is a new and no virus. That is impossible to make an effective vaccine. That the vaccine is 82% effective. That is protects against serious illness and deaths that all, of course, were foolish and lies. Today, World Health Organization is more dangerous for humanity than World Economic Forum. Thank you.
shellenberger
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 2:04 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 7:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the primary responsibility of civilization is to protect children from harm, yet many celebrate medical practices that disfigure them under the guise of addressing trauma. Despite some restrictions on gender surgeries, the scandal persists, driven by financial motives and a troubling ideology. Politicians lack a coherent message and moral compass, demanding harmful treatments for children. Without real leadership, the Democrats risk long-term damage, while Republicans may capitalize on the situation, opposing gender-affirming care and related issues for years to come.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The first duty of civilization is to protect children from predators. Ours celebrated medical predators as liberators, and condemned resisters as bigots. Teachers, medical groups, and Hollywood conspired to permanently disfigure children in the name of addressing their "trauma." https://t.co/H3Otm280jA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Civilization's duty is to protect children and guide them into adulthood. However, many institutions now support the notion that children can make significant medical decisions about their identities. This shift has led to a focus on affirmation and trauma, particularly since the 1960s, influencing corporate training and therapy practices. Activists argue that refusal to affirm trans identities causes further trauma, while many professionals misinterpret discomfort as dysphoria, pushing for immediate medical interventions instead of allowing children to mature naturally. The concept of trauma has expanded, pathologizing normal life experiences and leading to a view that everyday challenges in youth are sources of deep suffering, diverging from the understanding that such struggles are a natural part of growing up.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A central responsibility of civilization is to reproduce itself by protecting the welfare of children and by properly guiding them into adulthood and yet nearly every major institution in our society, from hospitals to elementary schools to hollywood studios to fortune 500 companies actively supported or went along with the inane idea that children know who they are and can make life altering medical decisions. Instead of protecting the young, our civilizations sacrifice them to deranged activists and medical predators. Psychologists went from emphasizing personal growth and resilience toward a greater emphasis on affirmation, self esteem, and addressing trauma starting in the 1960s and accelerating trauma starting in the 1960s and accelerating in the 1980s 90s as we noted earlier this week the idea that trauma is widespread among women minorities and others in society had a major impact on corporate sensitivity trainings and later on DEI, informing the concepts of triggers and microaggressions. In the treatment of gender distress, therapists and practitioners rely on similar ideas to argue that gender affirming medical care is needed to relieve the trauma of trans identified individuals. It is re traumatizing, say activists, when alleged transphobes refuse to affirm trans people by not using their preferred pronouns or when they engage in so called medical gatekeeping by daring to ask for the guardrails of informed consent. According to activists, anxiety, depression, and other psychiatric issues that are often comorbidities with gender dysphoria are actually just signs of so called minority stress, which is the theory that discrimination and mistreatment of trans people is what causes their other mental health conditions. In reality, doctors and therapists willfully mistake negative feelings and discomfort as dysphoria among children and adolescents who simply struggle to cope. Rather than give those children time to go through puberty, adjust to young adulthood, and develop tools to permanent body modification. At the heart of this approach is a view of trauma that fundamentally pathologies the heart of this approach is a view of trauma that fundamentally pathologizes life the hunt for trauma began when in the 1970s multiple personality disorder now rebranded dissociative identity disorder spread through a media and psychiatrist driven social contagion. The MPD epidemic and recovered memory scandal that followed hinged on the theory that individuals, mainly women, had hidden traumas waiting to be discovered. After lawsuits dismantled the MPD and recovered memory industry, psychiatrists repurposed those ideas to popularize the idea of trauma. This concept, once confined to a specific set of intense and uncommon experiences, was then subject to extreme concept creep. Over time, the psychotherapeutic establishment allowed for more and more experiences to be deemed traumatic. The natural endpoint of this logic was that the everyday lives of children and adolescents, which are full of difficult trials and unfortunate events, could be considered sources of irreconcilable suffering. Therapists, children, parents, and doctors alike started to see the pain some suffer in puberty as unjust pain rather than as a natural and inevitable part of life this approach was a fundamental abandonment of the enduring wisdom that has animated nearly every major civilization

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Trump has, blessedly, restricted gender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers for kids. But why did this scandal go on for so long? Part of the answer is money. Another is the rise of the "trauma" therapy cult. And, at the heart of trans medicine, is an anti-human nihilism. https://t.co/QmWO4tIhsh

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

.@GavinNewsom @EleniForCA @XavierBecerra @RobBonta you must end this barbarism at once. Here's a poll you can show your donors to assure them that you are continuing to act in your own self-interest. https://t.co/5ggIY1Xmhf

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The reason Democrats have "no coherent message" is because they have no moral compass. All these politicians demand the sterilization and mutilation of children by predators: @GavinNewsom @SpeakerPelosi @SenSchumer @AOC @EleniForCA @XavierBecerra https://t.co/YdwFGnf7XO

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

https://t.co/MrgylOdYic

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

It will be hard for the Democrats to come back from this scandal. If the party had real leaders, they would take the lead now in phasing out "gender affirming care" nationwide, repudiating it, and apologizing for it. If they did it ASAP, they might limit the damage.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

But since the party has no real leaders, and is instead led by craven individuals, it's likely that Republicans will be able to oppose gender affirming care and males in female sports for years to come. Dems are caught between voters and their base of extremist LGBT donors.

libsoftiktok
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 4:47 AM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 12:25 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Mental health counselor who’s a man pretending to be a woman, boasts about transing kids as he speaks against Montana SB 164 which would criminalize s*x change surgery and cross-s*x hormones for minors This is how desperate they are to mutilate your kids. https://t.co/DZhobOdKON

Video Transcript AI Summary
A therapist's client, a young teen entering puberty, understands that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth and wants to explore hormones or blockers. The supportive parents scheduled an endocrinologist appointment. The physician informed the parents that if SB 164 were to pass, providing gender-affirming care could lead to the doctor and parents being arrested and imprisoned. The client was devastated by the prospect of their care leading to the loss of their parents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This client of mine is in their early teens just entering puberty, and they have a clear understanding that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth. In therapy with me, they expressed their desire to explore options for starting hormones or blockers before their puberty advances further. One minute. So with my guidance, their parents who are loving and fully supportive recently scheduled an appointment with an endocrinologist to discuss an assessment and possible treatment options. During that appointment, my client was subjected to a truly traumatizing experience listening as the physician informed their parents that if SB 164 were to pass, proceeding with any gender affirming care for my client could lead to both the doctor and their parents being arrested and imprisoned. My client was devastated. Imagine your own child being placed in this situation, told that the price of their own care and well-being is the loss of their parents. Would you stand for it? Can you vote for a bill which causes such harm?
BarryOue21536
Posted - April 7, 2025 at 10:52 AM
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 12:40 PM

@BarryOue21536 - Beirut Barry

⚔️Can you Believe This ⚔️ ⭐️Misgendering your child ⭐️ 🤬 kids can be taken from you🤬 💥Time to take action People💥

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

JUST IN: CO Democrats have invoked Rule 16 to SHUT DOWN debate over their radical transgender bill that would make "misgendering" a "discriminatory act" and potentially take children away from parents who don't "affirm" their child's gender delusion. https://t.co/53xCWUCDpU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 requests that House Bill 1312 be read at length, as well as every subsequent bill. Speaker 0 acknowledges the request for the bill to be read at length.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pursuant to house rule 16, I move the following motion on passage of house bill thirteen twelve on third reading. Shall the main question be now put? Representative Weinberg, if you will please make your request into the microphone. Speaker 1: Thank you, madam speaker. Fellow colleagues, because of the actions today, I would request that this bill be read at length and every other bill after this. Speaker 0: There is a request for the bill to be read at length. House committee

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: Colorado House Democrats just passed a bill that makes "misgendering" a "discriminatory act," can take children away from parents who "misgender" and pushes all schools to promote trans ideology. https://t.co/21HGLtp7zB https://t.co/0kUj7fqay9

Video Transcript AI Summary
House Bill thirteen twelve is under consideration. An "aye" vote signifies approval, while a "no" vote signifies opposition. The vote is conducted. The "aye" votes prevail. House Bill thirteen twelve is passed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question before us is the passage of House Bill thirteen twelve. All those in favor, say aye. Aye. All those opposed, say no. No. The ayes have it. House Bill thirteen twelve has passed.
View Full Interactive Feed