reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - February 9, 2024 at 5:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN Agenda 21/2030 is infiltrating towns and cities in Canada, owning them without citizens' knowledge. The ICLEI and BARC initiatives are part of this agenda. Nancy Pelosi presented an Agenda 21 Bill in 1992, showing her globalist tendencies. The UN's plans extend to mega-cities and the Green New Deal is a Trojan Horse for their agenda. The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide provides more information. Saskatoon is being taken over by the UN's ICLEI. Nancy Pelosi's link to Agenda 21 has been removed. The UN has a sustainability plan until 2050.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

1/ Does the UN already Own your Hometown? Find out here. UN Agenda 21/2030. The testing fields. 😢 Great find @Valerie24190901! Thank you!

@Valerie24190901 - ITSMETOO2🇨🇦PPC BERNIER NATION

Stop The United Nations from OWNING your Hometown Outright https://canadafreepress.com/article/stop-the-united-nations-from-owning-your-hometown-outright @peoplespca @99freemind @cravecreative @MarkFriesen08 @BillyJoyce1976 @Alzer_One @FPVaughanIII

Stop The United Nations from OWNING your Hometown Outright Stop The United Nations from OWNING your Hometown Outright, saul Alinsky, Socialism, Agenda 21, ICLEI canadafreepress.com

@cravecreative - Nicky P

2/ If you live in any of these cities in Canada, your town/city has been chosen as the guinea pigs for the UN Agenda... and you probably don't even know it. The list can be found here from Wayback Machine. It is no longer on their new website. Wonder why? web.archive.org/web/2012072521…

@cravecreative - Nicky P

3/ Towns and cities—long ago hijacked by the United Nations Agenda 21/2030—have already completed the process and are now owned lock, stock and barrel by the UN without their citizens even being aware of it. Time to wake up Canada.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

Canada Free Press Article: https://canadafreepress.com/article/stop-the-united-nations-from-owning-your-hometown-outright

Stop The United Nations from OWNING your Hometown Outright Stop The United Nations from OWNING your Hometown Outright, saul Alinsky, Socialism, Agenda 21, ICLEI canadafreepress.com

@cravecreative - Nicky P

4/ Please keep in mind, the screencap provided was from 2010-2012 and was from their old ICLEI website. It's possible there are more towns and cities on that list. Contact your local municipality to learn more.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

5/ Just to clarify and if anyone was wondering, the Canadian ICLEI's website Staff page lists on various profiles the "Building Adaptive and Resilient Communities (BARC)",another initiative concocted & run by the UN. This clip was taken on the UN Habitat website on the next post.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

6/ Here's the website for reference. https://unhabitat.org/cop21-handbooks-and-decision-support/ The ICLEI "Building Adaptive and Resilient Communities (BARC)" is listed further down the page.

Handbooks and decision support | UN-Habitat unhabitat.org

@cravecreative - Nicky P

7/ Please pay particular notice to the logo... "For a better Urban Future." It's the UN Agenda 21/2030 folks. Up front and centre, and it's in your hometown.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

8/ So the plot thickens. "I ❤️ RESEARCHING." Imagine my surprise finding a video clip of Nancy Pelosi on October 2,1992 presenting an "Agenda 21" Bill to the US Senate. No wonder she hates Trump so much. Any doubt she's a globalist now? http://agenda21docs.com

@cravecreative - Nicky P

9/ I also found these confirmation on http://agenda21docs.com website. Keep in mind, this was posted on DECEMBER 16, 2013 so that proves how long this has been in the works.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

Pay particular attention to #4. "4. Create a new system of governance based on local decision-making within the framework of international agreements." Get it now? "create a NEW system based on LOCAL decision-making WITHIN... INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS". https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/06/27/are-you-ready-to-leave-the-u-n-and-their-agenda/amp/?fbclid=IwAR079nIFMkxRbu3xwZbAxvcmjheQOP2l_noekbBRV6ka2OP3CMiGscZH-ns&__twitter_impression=true

@cravecreative - Nicky P

The UN is dictating how your local community will be run. Under their rules. Are you awake yet folks? Are you ready to be under Global Rule? Well you already are. The UN has slithered itself into your communities and you don't even know it.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

12/ I suppose this is a good time to mention that the UN's plans don't stop at Agenda21 & Agenda2030. They've actually gone so far as to predict where you'll be forced to live come 2050. The Agenda: MEGA-Cities. The UN will dictate every aspect of your lives folks. You woke yet?

@cravecreative - Nicky P

13/ UN in Vancouver Feb/2019...

@cravecreative - Nicky P

14/ The UN Trojan Horse masked as the New Green Deal.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

1/ What is UN Agenda21 & Agenda2030? How is the Green New Deal part of that agenda? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD4CZomBPxs This is about land ownership, energy use, food we eat, the cars we drive, reorganization of human society, systematic tearing down of communities, & our infrastructure.

@cravecreative - Nicky P

@Valerie24190901 - ITSMETOO2🇨🇦PPC BERNIER NATION

This may be new to you! 180 pages The Local Agenda 21 Planning Guide https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/uploads/4/4/6/6/4466371/iclei.local-agenda-21.planning.guide.pdf @99freemind @cravecreative @MarkFriesen08 @O_Dread_Gothic @Derek_FacT @brianlilley

@cravecreative - Nicky P

Head's up Saskatoon! The UN's ICLEI is taking over your city. Decisions made moving forward will be of International Influence under the UN Agenda Guidelines for Sustainable Development...ie: One World Government. Demand to KNOW where your $$ is going(UN). https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/saskatoon-gears-up-for-19-billion-low-emissions-plan-vote/amp

Saskatoon gears up for $19-billion low-emissions plan vote Monday decision looms for plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent over three decades thestarphoenix.com

@cravecreative - Nicky P

The original link of Nancy Pelosi was taken down. Lucky I like to dig. 😎 Remember folks. This was her in 1992, passing UN Agenda21, Sustainable Development. Her globslist ways have been showing for decades. She sold her State and Amerca out long ago. https://youtu.be/Iw_HB2Olih0

@cravecreative - Nicky P

https://t.co/bcHFb0Gn7h

@cravecreative - Nicky P

Thread: 1/ Here's another UN dig. This is WBCSD's InfoGraphic of the UN's 'sustainability plan' beginning in 2010, spanning to 2050. Review👇🏻this link👇🏻. Download it. Read it. https://docs.wbcsd.org/2017/03/Vision2050-PathwayMural.pdf It's the "Pathway toward a sustainable 2050". https://t.co/5ZoF4mV4x8

Saved - May 1, 2023 at 8:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration is accused of working towards global technocratic fascist totalitarian governance, using cities to subvert national laws and the constitution. The open border is intentional, as globalists within the government have pledged allegiance to the UN, not the constitution. The goal is to collect data on everyone and everything on the planet for global technocratic governance and a digital dictatorship. Fentanyl is allowed to pour across the border to create chaos, necessitating a global response. The plan is to create regions that would report to and be governed by the global technate established at the UN.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The Biden regime was installed to usher in global technocratic fascist totalitarian governance. They are using cities to subvert our national laws and constitution. Our federal government is in on this plan. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to thank Governor Polis and Mayor Hancock for their leadership and for hosting the city summit in Denver. This summit brings together mayors, governors, indigenous leaders, and various networks to address global challenges at a local level. We made commitments on migration, climate change, democratic governance, and economic growth at the last summit in Los Angeles. City leaders play a crucial role in tackling these challenges, from integrating migrants to responding to natural disasters and public health crises. Cities are where democracy is closest to its people, allowing for accountability and innovative solutions. We will continue to prioritize the voices of city leaders in our work, including at the upcoming 10th Summit of the Americas. This is just the beginning of many city summits to come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I also want to especially thank, governor Polis, mayor Hancock, not just for your hospitality, but for your leadership as well in bringing us all together. We picked Denver to host the inaugural city summit of the Americas in large part because of its track record in addressing global challenges at a local level. And that's really what this summit is all about for us. I'm so thrilled to be joined by literally hundreds of mayors and governors, tribal and other indigenous leaders, along with dozens of networks which support them like ICLAY, the US conference of mayors, c, C40 Cities group. We also want to welcome the many representatives of civil society and the private sector who are here with us today. If you go back to last June, leaders from across our hemisphere came together in Los Angeles for the 9th summit of the Americas. We agreed to ambitious commitments on issues that actually matter in the lives of all of our citizens, migration, climate change, Democratic governance, sustainable, inclusive economic growth. Each of you as city leaders are on the front lines of tackling these global challenges. You're welcoming and integrating migrants into your communities. You're planning for and responding to natural disasters made more frequent by the climate crisis. You're addressing the issues that are facing your residents from law enforcement challenges like ransomware To public health crises like the COVID pandemic, your efforts day in day out are helping us make progress on the commitments that we made as countries in Los Angeles. Cities, when you come down to it, are where democracy is closest to its people. And when cities are responsive to the needs of residents, They demonstrate democracy's greatest strength, its ability to improve on itself, to empower citizens to hold their leaders accountable, to try out different solutions and to allow the best ideas to rise to the top. We're hosting the city summit of the Americas because our collective ability to deliver for our people and to tackle global issues depends on all of you. It's as simple and as straightforward as that. And we look forward to continuing to elevate your voices in every dimension of our work, in the hemisphere, including at the 10th Summit of the Americas that'll be hosted by the Dominican Republic. And it's also why we plan for this to be the first, but not the last, of many city summits to come.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The open border is intentional. The one world government globalists within our government have pledged allegiance to the UN and not our constitution. This is treason. One reason they are for open borders is coming up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sharing knowledge and solutions is crucial for addressing global challenges. The speaker emphasizes the importance of connections and interconnectivity. They encourage the audience to use the connections made at the summit to continue engaging and sharing ideas. The speaker highlights three areas where cities are leading the way: migration, national government learning from cities, and incorporating city perspectives into national policies. They discuss the unprecedented number of displaced people globally and the migration challenge in the hemisphere. The Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection was a regional approach to address this challenge. Bogota, under Mayor Claudia Lopez's leadership, has implemented measures to integrate migrants, providing them with essential services and opportunities. These efforts demonstrate that migration can be managed safely and contribute to community growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now what we know is this and what I've learned over 30 or so years of doing this, going around the world, is this. Somewhere, some part of the world, someone has figured out the solution to a problem that many people are trying to solve. But if we don't share that information, if we don't share that knowledge, then everyone else just has to keep reinventing the wheel. So our success in addressing the many issues that we're trying to tackle right now depends on the best ideas being shared among all of you. And it's why I hope that the connections, and that's the that the word that Mike used, is the word indeed that comes back again and again, connections, interconnectivity. I hope the connections you've made here in Denver will last a long time and that you use them to continue to to, engage with each other, to share ideas, to share solutions. And as I said, our success depends on these ideas being shared among you. It also depends on national governments learning from you, incorporating the ideas and perspectives of our cities and communities into the policies that we're making at a national level. So what I thought I'd do today as we're closing out this summit is to share just 3 areas where cities are leading the way and where deeper connections between cities and national governments can make a profound difference in the lives and livelihoods of our people, starting with the 1st issue I'll talk about, migration. Now if you step back for a minute and think about the moment we're in, globally, there are more people displaced from their homes around the world than at any time in recorded history, more than a 100,000,000. In our own hemisphere, more than 20,000,000 people are on the move. Back at the Summit of the Americas, we came to, together to to try to address what is an unprecedented migration challenge across our hemisphere through something we call the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection, which reflected the first truly regional approach to the issue, 21 countries agreed that we have a shared responsibility to tackle the migration challenge together, and they agreed on a shared set of principles and priorities, among them expanding protections for migrants who are at risk. So under the leadership of mayor Claudia Lopez, someone I've had the great pleasure of working with on many occasions, she's here with us today, Bogota has been putting this principle into practice since last year. I had a chance to visit, last time I was in Colombia, one of the city's pioneering migrate migration, integration facilities which offers basically a one stop shop where people get a temporary protected status card. They get connected to jobs, they get connected to schools, they get to sign up for essential services like health care. Because of these efforts, Bogota has welcomed more refugees in recent years than any other city in the Americas or as mayor Lepez likes to call them, new Bogotanas. Colombia as a whole has given refuge to more than 2 a half 1000000 Venezuelans who are displaced by their country's crisis. And because the protected status that Colombia gives them allows Venezuelans to work, they're also contributing to Colombia's economy, filling jobs, providing services, starting new businesses? These efforts are driving growth. They're creating opportunities for Colombians as well as Venezuelans. And they're showing that we can actually manage migration safely, humanely, and use it as an opportunity to strengthen our communities.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

They are subverting our constitution for the UN.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://www.unrefugees.org/news/unhcr-welcomes-los-angeles-declaration-on-migration-and-protection-in-the-americas/

UNHCR welcomes Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection in the Americas UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, welcomes the adoption of the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection which pledges to promote international protection and migration in the Americas. unrefugees.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

I don’t know how these people lie with a straight face, and that anyone believes them. As thinking people know, our government is anything but transparent. Just ask where covid came from and they won’t tell you the truth. Regardless, transparency isn’t about transparency. It’s about data collection. For global technocratic governance and a digital dictatorship to work, they have to collect data on everyone and everything on the planet, including contracts.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Chihuahua, Mexico, a local anti-corruption nonprofit called Curewa addressed the lack of transparency in their municipal government. They collaborated with Mexican NGOs, the United Nations Development Program, and the US Agency for International Development to create a digital platform. This platform tracks and publishes open municipal contracts, allowing constituents to monitor how their tax dollars are spent. As a result, all municipal contracts in Chihuahua City are now published online. The success of this tool has led to its expansion, with 15 other city and state governments in Mexico adopting it. This initiative aims to reduce corruption, increase public participation, and build trust in government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Final area I'd wanna talk about today and that's transparency in our governance. In Chihuahua, Mexico, members of a local anti corruption nonprofit, Curewa, came together to tackle the lack of transparency in their municipal government. In 2019, when this initiative started, only about 60% of municipal contracts were being publicly bid. That meant that many companies were left out of the bidding process, reducing competition, driving up costs for taxpayers. Trejo teamed up with other Mexican NGOs, with the United Nations Development Program, and with the US Agency For International Development to put together a digital platform that tracks and publishes open municipal contracts, that follows the bidding process, that allows constituents to monitor where their tax dollars are being spent. Now, 100% of municipal contracts in Chihuahua City are published online. The tool's been so successful that it's now being rolled out free of cost to 15 other city and state governments across Mexico, decreasing the potential for corruption, increasing people's participation and trust in government, something that is especially critical in the times that we're living

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

These people allow fentanyl to pour across the intentionally open border to cause chaos that will eventually necessitate a global response (which is the goal). Their solution is not to close the border. It is to collect data AND SHARE IT WITH THEIR GLOBAL MASTERS to create the mass surveillance state and no doubt for some kind of sick social engineering scheme. In a sane world both Blinken and Mayorkus would be in jail for treason.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Denver and the State Department have partnered to build early detection systems for tracking synthetic drugs like Fentanyl. This collaboration aims to develop interventions to save lives by sharing findings with other partners. The local level solutions have a significant impact on national and international problems. Fentanyl is the leading cause of death among Americans aged 18 to 49, and the US has seized enough Fentanyl to kill every American. The State Department is working on an international solution, but national and local responses are also crucial. Denver's important work in this area was highlighted, and the Denver Declaration was signed by numerous cities, reflecting their commitment to addressing challenges such as affordable housing, migration, and the climate crisis. Over 45 cities participated in this initiative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On issue after issue, in city after city, local leaders are pointing the way to effective solutions. This week's summit shows many more promising opportunities to deliver for our people including one starting right here in Denver. The city of Denver and the State Department signed an agreement to partner on building early detection systems to track the evolution of new synthetic drugs like Fentanyl so that we can develop life saving interventions early on. We'll share our findings with partners across the hemisphere so that we can inform locally led efforts to counter this public health and security threat. Now, this is a powerful, illustration of how solutions that we're finding and answers that we're finding at the local level can have a powerful impact on the most pressing, most urgent national problems and international problems we face. Fentanyl in the United States is responsible for more deaths among Americans aged 18 to 49 than anything else. Think about that for a second, the leading cause of death in our country for Americans aged 18 to 49, synthetic opioids like Fentanyl. Last year, We seized enough Fentanyl to kill every single American. That's the scale of the problem. By definition, it has to have an international solution which We're working on very hard at the State Department under President Biden's guidance but also national and local responses. And I had a chance to see some of the incredibly important work that Denver is doing, right here and I'm grateful for the partnership that we have. Dozens of cities from across the hemisphere also came together to sign the Denver Declaration, which reflects their shared commitment to addressing the challenges facing our cities including affordable housing, migration and the climate crisis. And thanks to the leadership of Rio de Janeiro mayor, Eduardo Pais, more than 45 cities

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

They are using cities to subvert national sovereignty. The uniparty (including @RepJoeWilson) introduced the “City and State Diplomacy Act” to accomplish this. It doesn’t appear to have passed so the Biden regime totalitarians just created one out of thin air. Anything to destroy our country and usher in a one world government.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cities from across the hemisphere signed the Denver Declaration, showing their commitment to addressing challenges like affordable housing, migration, and the climate crisis. Rio de Janeiro Mayor, Eduardo Pais, led the launch of the Anti Racist Cities Network, where cities will share best practices for equity and inclusion. Discrimination hampers democracies, including the United States, by depriving them of the strength and innovation of their citizens. To empower all populations, the State Department established a city and state diplomacy office. The office's importance is evident at the Denver summit, where Ambassador Nuna Hachigian and her team have been building ties. They are available for connections during the remaining time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cities from across the hemisphere also came together to sign the Denver Declaration, which reflects their shared commitment to addressing the challenges facing our cities including affordable housing, migration, and the climate crisis. And thanks to the leadership of Rio de Janeiro Mayor, Eduardo Pais, more than 45 cities also launched the Anti Racist Cities Network through which cities will share best practices promoting equity, and inclusion in our societies. Discrimination robs democracies, including ours in the United States, of the strength, the innovation, the creativity of so many of our citizens which is exactly what we need to more effectively face the challenges of our time. That's why efforts like this one are really important in empowering our full populations. To strengthen the partnership between the United States mayors and their counterparts across the world, we at the State Department recently launched a new city and state diplomacy office. So, again, people might ask, how is it that we have an office at the State Department to engage at the subnational level? Well, this summit here in Denver demonstrates exactly why it was important for us to do that. Since October, Ambassador Nuna Hachigian and her team have been working at building the ties that we're seeing come to full fruition here in Denver. Ambassador Atchigian has held senior positions at the White House, the State Department, and the City of Los Angeles where she was deputy mayor for international affairs. Nina and her team are are here in Denver. If you haven't had the chance to connect up with them yet, I hope, in the remaining time that you have, you'll take the opportunity to do so.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

A New World Order

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://www.brookings.edu/research/partnership-among-cities-states-and-the-federal-government-creating-an-office-of-subnational-diplomacy-at-the-us-department-of-state/

Partnership among cities, states, and the federal government: Creating an office of subnational diplomacy at the US Department of State Anthony F. Pipa and Max Bouchet make the case for a new office in the U.S. Department of State to leverage the global leadership and experiences of mayors and governors. brookings.edu

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The webs of global technocratic governance that these people have established is never ending and comprehensive. This includes the C40 Cities and ICLEI (the UN takeover of cities).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The State Department's engagement with cities is a crucial part of their work. They collaborate with embassies on various issues such as connecting businesses, promoting energy security, combating human trafficking, and improving global health. The Innovation Plaza at the summit showcased solutions for government services, recycling, sustainability, and housing. To further this work, the Cities Forward initiative was launched, connecting 12 American cities with 12 Latin American and Caribbean cities. They will share experiences and lessons on reducing pollution and designing infrastructure to withstand natural disasters. Funding and technical assistance will be provided to develop sustainability action plans. The goal is to expand this initiative to cities throughout the hemisphere. Collaboration between cities, businesses, governments, and organizations is crucial for addressing challenges and creating a better future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The city and state diplomacy team's work is a key component but not the only component of the State Department's substantive engagement with cities across our hemisphere. Many of you in this audience have worked closely with our embassies in your, in your countries, in your cities on a wide variety of issues, connecting your city's businesses with the US private sector, launching partnerships to strengthen our shared energy security, combating human trafficking, promoting global health. In so many ways, the connectivity between our department and your cities is helping to produce real results. Earlier today, I also had a chance and I hope, Again, some of you, if not all of you, had the opportunity to do this. I had a chance to visit the Innovation Plaza at the summit where many of our companies are displaying solutions that they found to the challenges that you're trying to address from accessing government services, to recycling and sustainability, to housing. These connections too between cities and the private sector are another very vital part of this gathering. Now to build on all of this work, we're devoting additional resources to our engagement with Cities. Yesterday, we launched something called Cities Forward, an initiative to help Cities build a sustainable, inclusive, and resilient future. Through this program, which we're running with our implementing partners, resilient cities catalyst and the Institute of the Americas, we'll start by connecting 12 American cities, here in the United States with 12 Latin American and Caribbean cities so that they can share directly experiences and lessons on everything from how they're finding new ways to reduce air and water pollution to designing their infrastructure to better withstand more intense and frequent natural disasters. We'll also support participating cities with funding, technical assistance to develop and implement sustainability action plans that benefit all of their constituents including those from underserved communities. And while we're starting with 24 Cities, We plan to share our findings with cities throughout our entire hemisphere so that what we, learn from this initiative, we can take that and we can scale it. I'm doing a little advertising. The application for Cities Forward is now live. Consider applying. As you all know well, there is tremendous collaboration already happening in communities across our hemisphere. To cite just one example, look at the work being done here in Denver by community leaders, Kristin Lacey and Vivi Lemus who are also here with us today. When they first met, Kristen and Vivi realized how much that they had in common. Vivi was born in Guatemala. Kristen had spent years working there. They loved 2 things, coffee and cooking. They shared a dream of creating a space to build community between Spanish and English speakers. So they started putting away their savings. They got financing from local lenders. A fellow entrepreneur tipped them off to an open space and city leaders stepped in to help them secure it. Last year, Kristin and Invidia opened Convidio Cafe, Denver's 1st women and immigrant owned bilingual coffee shop. They source their coffee directly from Guatemalan growers. That allows farmers to earn up to 4 times the profit they otherwise would. And they use the walls of their cafe as a space to display art that exposes customers to Guatemalan culture. Connections like these are leading to tangible benefits for people across our countries through greater exports and good paying jobs that respect labor rights, that give workers a fair shot at getting ahead, providing for their families and their communities. These partnerships are already being built not only between our people and businesses but also city and national governments, labor unions, civil society, multilateral organizations. We're increasingly bound together through these connections. And what's so important is that we're putting them to work, putting them to work to meet the challenges of our time, the challenges we have to face if we're going to make a meaningful difference in the lives and livelihoods of our fellow citizens. President Biden has said on more than one occasion that we have everything we need to deliver for our people right here in our own hemisphere. And work being led by cities across the region, which you shared throughout the summit shows exactly how we're doing that. So to each and every one of you who's participated this week and to each and every one of you who's not only participating this week but engaging every single day, in these efforts, thank you. Thank you for your leadership. Thank you for your partnership. Thank you for the work that we're doing together as we build toward a more secure, a more prosperous shared future in the Americas. I, for 1, am greatly looking forward to seeing all that we can accomplish for our people and for our hemisphere in the months years ahead following up on everything that's happened this week here in Denver. Thank you all so much.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

All I can say is is that if a democrat is president in 2025, our country is finished. That’s what Biden meant by “finishing the job”.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

ICLEI

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

ICLEI is the UN takeover of local governments in order to implement the technocratic sustainability agenda. Before people caught on, ICLEI distributed a guide on Agenda 21.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

ICLEI

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

ICLEI is the UN control of local governments and municipalities. You MUST find out if they are in your area. If they are, GET THEM OUT NOW. "Local and regional governments across the ICLEI network represent a diversity of cities, towns and regions. https://iclei.org/our_network/

Our network - ICLEI iclei.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

ICLEI

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

I was going to clip this video but people should watch the entire thing to learn how the oligarchical NGOs are taking over local municipalities and using our taxpayer dollars to do it. The UN is doing the same thing through ICLEI (think globally, act https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_isXnVJX0JU…

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Our demise has been in the works for a long time.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Who wrote the forward to the ICLEI Agenda 21 guide? Maurice Strong Who is Maurice Strong?

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Maurice Strong propagator of the scientifically flawed theory that man-made CO2 emissions causes Global Warming. https://geopolitics.co/2022/10/31/the-dark-origins-of-the-davos-great-reset/

The Dark Origins of the Davos Great Reset Important to understand is that there is not one single new or original idea in Klaus Schwab’s so-called Great Reset agenda for the world. Nor is his Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda his or his … geopolitics.co

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

C40

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The former mayor of LA can tell you more about C40.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

If you don’t think this has already infiltrated the US, let Eric Garcetti change your mind while talking about a “global green new deal”. You need to find out if your mayor is beholden to his/her citizens or to global technocratic governance under the guise of sustainability.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Los Angeles mayor and C40 chair, Eric Garcetti, expresses pride in joining the Race to Zero dialogues and emphasizes the importance of collaboration in tackling the climate emergency. He acknowledges the work of climate champions Nigel Topping and Gonzalo Munoz in mobilizing leaders globally. Garcetti highlights the need for cooperation to achieve a zero carbon future, recover from the pandemic, and create sustainable and equitable cities. He mentions the commitment of over 100 cities to cutting emissions and forming the Global Mayor's COVID-19 recovery task force. Garcetti urges immediate and transformational climate action, inviting cities worldwide to join the global movement based on the principles of the Green New Deal. He emphasizes the urgency of making meaningful change and securing a future defined by a healthy planet, equity, and livable cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Los Angeles mayor and C40 chair, Eric Garcetti. I'm so proud to join you for the Race to Zero dialogues, and I'm inspired to be a part of this global gathering focused on tackling the climate emergency. We're in the midst of the fight of our lives, a fight for our health, for our planet, for our future, and collaboration is the only way that we can win it. So I want to acknowledge the work of 2 climate champions, Nigel Topping and Gonzalo Munoz. What you have accomplished in mobilizing leaders from every sector across the globe is nothing short of extraordinary. It's this kind of cooperation that we will use to achieve a zero carbon future. It's how we'll recover from a devastating pandemic and reimagine a path of sustainability and equity of good jobs in our cities. As chair of C40, I have the privilege of collaborating with mayors worldwide to accelerate our bold climate actions, hold each other accountable, and do everything possible to make our cities healthier and more equitable. Just over a year ago, I was with more than 80 fellow mayors at the C40 World Mayors Summit in Copenhagen. Together with labor and business, civic and youth leaders, we laid out a bold vision of a global green new deal. Today, our goals and commitment are the same, but something critical has changed. Now the climate emergency is one of several intersecting crises, a public health crisis, an economic crisis, and in the US, especially, a reckoning with racial injustice. And through these challenges, C40 mayors have stepped up to meet this moment with bold and creative leadership. Already, thanks to the efforts of C40, More than 100 cities around the world have committed to cutting their emissions at a rate that will make it possible to keep global heating within the boundaries scientists consider safe, 1.5 degrees Celsius. And those cities have matched action with commitments. More than 40 will have already peaked emissions by the end of this year. We also formed the Global Mayor's COVID nineteen recovery task force to map out the road to a green and just recovery paved on the principles of our global Green New Deal. We know that such recovery will create 50,000,000 jobs, prevent more than a quarter 1000000 premature deaths by tackling air pollution, save $1,400,000,000 in health care costs, and more than half our greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. But we must act now. We need every city to take immediate and transformational climate action, which is why today, C40 and the Race to 0 are kicking off a campaign to invite cities around the world to join us in building a global movement. Our goal is that by this time next year, when we gather in Glasgow, as many as 1,000 mayors of cities, large and small, will stand together, united in our commitment to bold climate action based on the principles of the global Green New Deal. This is an unprecedented moment in human history, and we know we have just a few short years left to make a meaningful change, to take meaningful climate action. And people around the world want us to act with the urgency needed to deliver the future that they want, a future defined by a healthy planet for ourselves and our children and grandchildren, a future defined by equity, by good jobs and clean air, and by livable cities. And I know that together, mayors across the world, together with scientists and business, labor and youth leaders, and willing national governments can and will build that global movement. We will secure that future. So thank you. Stay safe and healthy

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

C40

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

C40 is an organization of mayors across the world working together to subvert national sovereignty, in the name of “climate change” of course. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9FLOXp7jumE

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/?language=en_US

C40 Knowledge HubSearchLoading The C40 Knowledge Hub is a key resource of climate solutions for city practitioners, policymakers and anyone wanting to learn about best practices for cities. c40knowledgehub.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://www.c40.org/

C40 Cities - A global network of mayors taking urgent climate action C40 Cities is a global network of nearly 100 mayors of the world’s leading cities that are united in action to confront the climate crisis. c40.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://iamericas.org/

Home For 40 years, the Institute of the Americas has promoted sound public policy and fostered cooperation between public and private sector stakeholders across the hemisphere.Our diverse programs emphasize innovation and technological advancement as the key to building 21st-century economies in the Americas. iamericas.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The technocrats are using cities to get around national sovereignty, and because in dystopia cities will become super regions. The Rockefeller Foundation has a projected called 100 Resilient Cities to accomplish this goal. https://rockefellerfoundation.org/100-resilient-cities/

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The technocrats are using cities to get around national sovereignty, and because in dystopia cities will become super regions. The Rockefeller Foundation has a projected called 100 Resilient Cities to accomplish this goal. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/100-resilient-cities/

100 Resilient Cities - The Rockefeller Foundation Overview In 2013, The Rockefeller Foundation pioneered 100 Resilient Cities to help more cities build resilience to the physical, social, and economic rockefellerfoundation.org

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Instead of sovereign nations, the plan is to create regions that would report to and be governed by the global technate established at the UN. https://t.co/RLOnMXCthn

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

As part of the UN WEF Vision 2050 plan, nation states will cease to exist. Instead, megaregions will be created with the remaining land being deemed off limits to humans in the name of climate change of course. The technocrats will run each region. There will be no democracy.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

We need to figure out which uniparty members are working for a one world government and arrest them for treason. It’s that simple. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l5-W5gHZqao

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

https://t.co/UpfmFDxvcM

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

I would never gloatingly say I told you so but I TOLD YOU SO. 😂🤷🏼‍♀️ Eyes wide open.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad believes that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a strategy by a powerful group, led by the US, to dominate the global economy and establish a one-world government. He argues that this government would be controlled by wealthy, intelligent, and powerful elites, with no emphasis on democracy or choosing leaders. Mahathir suggests that those who resist this new order would face punishment, and the ultimate goal is to reduce the world's population from 7 billion to 1 billion. He mentions methods such as starvation or preventing births to achieve this objective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Malaysia's former prime minister doctor Mahathir Mohamad said that the Trans Pacific Partnership or TPPA is a new world order strategy by a powerful pact of people led by the US to dominate the world economy. Speaking at the international conference titled New World Order, Recipe for Peace or War, organized by the Pardana Global Peace Foundation, doctor Mahadeh said, globalization and borderless trade are being used to establish a one world government. Speaker 1: Basically, it is about having a world government. We should abolish all states, All nations, all borders, but instead have only 1 world government. And that world government is to be by certain people, elites, people who are very rich, very intelligent, Very powerful in many ways. They are the ones who will govern the world. There was not much talk about democracy Or choice of leaders. Instead, there was to be a government by these elites Who will impose their rules on everyone in this world and for those who are unwilling To submit to them, there will be punishment. And the peace that we will get from this Is the peace of the graveyard because the intention also is to reduce the number of people In this world, at the time when the new world order was enunciated, The population of this world was only 3,000,000,000. The intention was to reduce it to 1,000,000,000. Now the population of the world is 7,000,000,000. There will be a need to kill Many billions of people was to starve them to death or to prevent them from giving birth Order to reduce the population of this world.
Saved - May 30, 2023 at 1:05 PM

@Risemelbourne - 𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝙀

Coffs Harbour NSW 🇦🇺 Boom 💣 The Pushback Begins 🔥 Coffs Harbour Council forced to address Public Concerns after huge crowds turned out to oppose plans for it to become a "15 𝙈𝙞𝙣𝙪𝙩𝙚 𝘾𝙞𝙩𝙮".... It would seem the People are Waking Up 🔥#climatescam #climatehoax

Video Transcript AI Summary
Coffs Harbour City Council's plan for 15 minute neighborhoods has sparked concern among residents who feel it restricts freedom of movement. The council aims to reduce car dependency and carbon footprint by improving footpaths and cycleways. However, some worry about potential over-surveillance through biometrics and license plate tracking. The council denies these claims and insists it is not a lockdown or observation mechanism. They are currently reviewing public feedback and have increased security measures at council meetings. Residents are requesting more engagement and conversation from the council.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mounting concern over Coffs Harbour City Council's move towards 15 minute cities, but some residents say the plan amounts to restricting freedom of movement. Speaker 1: There has been a public backlash to a new vision outlining the future of transport in Coffs Harbour. Speaker 2: 15 minute neighborhoods where where All the essential services and all the facilities that you may need to visit would be within 15 minutes. Speaker 1: Councilors caught off guard by a large public Turn out to a series of recent council meetings with residents calling for answers. Speaker 2: A little bit, surprising that we had a Full a full, gallery and Speaker 1: The council says the main goal is to reduce our dependency on the family car. The plan to install more footpaths and cycleways, thereby reducing our carbon footprint. Speaker 2: Anything that requires larger than 15 minute radio commute It would obviously have an impact on the pollution that occurs from the vehicles. Speaker 1: But some are concerned the proposal goes too far, Potentially restricting freedom of movement. Speaker 3: Biometrics, license plate reading. Are you gonna be tracked everywhere you go in order for them to administer a carbon credit System. Speaker 1: Coffs City Council has downplayed the concerns and denies the plan amounts to over surveillance. Speaker 2: It's not a lockdown mechanism and it's not a observation mechanism at all. Speaker 1: The council is now reviewing a big public response during the draft exhibition period. Speaker 2: We receive A whole ton of submissions on that. Speaker 1: It's posting security guards at council meetings and insisting people register beforehand. Speaker 3: And we have questions, and we'd like to cancel to engage in conversation, and they don't seem to be willing to do that. Speaker 1: This Penny, 7 News.
Saved - April 28, 2024 at 6:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Colchester resident, Rachel Mathews, criticizes the local council's "green" policy, highlighting the environmental impacts and cost of EVs and renewable energy sources. Councilor Steph Nissan tries to silence Mathews, but is later proven wrong. Another resident, Carianna Cooper, calls out the council for adopting a two-tier system in public discourse. The posts commend Mathews and provide her profile for further follow-up.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This might just be the coldest takedown of Net Zero policy I've ever seen... Colchester resident Rachel Mathews systematically dissects local council's "green" policy, exposing the environmental impacts/cost of EVs and renewable energy sources Clashes followed. Video thread🧵 https://t.co/UGeNoBZHhE

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been a supporter of green energy for years, but I was shocked to learn about the environmental and human costs of solar panels and wind turbines. The production of these technologies involves forced labor, pollution, and resource consumption. The so-called green solutions are not as ethical as they seem, and the climate change industry is driven by profit. We need to be mindful of the impact of our choices on the environment and human rights to prevent further damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening. I've been a supporter of green energy and a keen environmentalist since my twenties. My office is solar powered, so I was mortified to discover that a single lithium mine causes millions of tons of waste every year laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium polluting the water supply for 300 years. Not to mention the unacceptable human cost for child labor to mine cobalt. When I researched which solar panel to purchase I did not for 1 minute consider it would be made by people trapped labor camps being exposed to large quantities of quartz dust which causes silicosis. Please note that the Ethical Consumer Organisation report that it is hard to avoid forced labor in the solar panel supply chain. Wind turbines, which last about 20 years, consume a colossal amount of resources and energy to manufacture and install, not to mention the blight and bird kill. They require diesel engines to start them up and then gallons of oil to lubricate and they can't readily be recycled. Solar panels are also extremely difficult to recycle, costing more than the production of the panel. And lithium batteries pose steep challenges too. Add to that the human suffering which we've all unwittingly been part of just by owning a laptop or mobile phone which is minimal compared to what's required for an EV or solar farm. These so called green or ethical solutions aren't solutions at all, just very good marketing from the $1,500,000,000,000 a year climate change industry. That's $4,000,000,000 a day, by the way. None of us can undo what's already been done. But what we can all do is make sure this doesn't escalate exponentially with fleets of unnecessary EVs and acres of solar farms eating up our precious farmland.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

After Mathews outlines how the council is effectively funding slavery by sourcing materials like lithium abroad... Councillor Steph Nissan pipes up and tries to shut Mathews down despite reportedly giving a gentlemen who spoke before Mathews time to run over https://t.co/1uFZDnlzfC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions if the council agrees they must always seek the best knowledge and stop harmful policies. The meeting chair interrupts due to time constraints, leading to a discussion about fairness in enforcing rules. The speaker reiterates their question about the council's obligation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, do counsel agree that it is your obligation to always seek the best available knowledge and that should it so transpire that any policy, how so ever well intentioned, may subsequently prove harmful. And then the council are obligated to stop. Sorry. I I have finished. What was what was the interruption? Speaker 1: The second bell rang, which indicated that the allocated time available had, expired as explained when you came to the desk. There's a bell at 2 minutes and then there's another bell at 3 minutes. Speaker 0: Yes. And I had one sentence left to finish, and you let the last gentleman go on for about another 30 seconds after the bell. So it needs to be, rules that apply to everybody, not just the ones that you don't like what they're saying. Speaker 1: Respectfully, I don't dislike what you're saying. This is the first time I have heard it. All I'm trying to ensure is that the meeting runs smoothly. That's all I'm seeking to do here. Speaker 0: Well, basically, my last question is, does the council agree that your obligation to always seek best available knowledge? And that should it so transpire that any policy, howsoever well intentioned, may subsequently prove harmful, then council is obligated to stop.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

After receiving responses from other councillors on the issues raised in her speech, Mathews rebuts but not before Nissan pipes up and tries to shut her down again, saying she can't respond. Moments later, Nissan is left egg-faced after she is told Mathews can respond... https://t.co/QkKA1bfkMl

Video Transcript AI Summary
Currently, high costs make it difficult to add new solutions. Investing in substandard technologies may lead to wasted money. It's important to wait for better solutions. The lack of a clear definition of a climate emergency makes it hard to implement effective policies. Properly defining the emergency and providing evidence is crucial to gaining public support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moment costs are currently way more than, double, so I'm not sure that we can, particularly add. Speaker 1: If you invest money in these substandard technologies, you will just increase them, whereas it'd be better to hold out until the Real Grain Solutions do come on board. And we're not there yet. Speaker 0: Matthews, I appreciate that you have made your contribution. Thank you. Speaker 1: You get an extra minute to rebuff. No. Speaker 0: Then my apologies. Please do respond as an can I ask the members of the public gallery to show respect to the board and everybody who's trying to do their best, ensure that a meeting is held, that everybody can engage in with respect? Thank you. Speaker 1: I think they're being very respectful. As I was saying, unless you have really good solutions, you are investing money in things that ultimately you're gonna waste money on. You'll just get EB points everywhere, and then the government will turn around and say, oh, no, they're no good. So you're going to waste money. You're investing in slavery, which is unacceptable. If it was your family members that had children that have been crushed to death down these mines, would this be your answer? It's too costly to find alternatives, especially when no one here can actually fully explain what the climate emergency is. By your own admission, the council doesn't have an official definition of a climate emergency. So the council's actions have sprung from a claim of emergency, which no one here is able to define. If you cannot clearly define the emergency, how can anyone possibly know when it's over or moreover, look to impose rationally any policy response without knowing? The emergency needs to be properly defined and evidence if you were to get the public on board with your associated proposal.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Another Colchester resident, Carianna Cooper, then calls out council members and demands they not adopt a two-tier system where they let residents who support the council's "green" policies have more time to talk uninterrupted than residents who are critical of their policy... https://t.co/7cacHEefU6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Please show respect by not talking while others are speaking. Let's have a level playing field and show respect both ways. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd appreciate not to use any of my time to just point out while you are voicing your opinion on respect, 2 of you were sitting having a conversation that I could hear whilst the previous speaking was talking. So if we could have a level playing field in terms of not 2 tier systeming and expressing respect both ways, that would be much appreciated. Thank you very much. No headwind please. Thank you.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Incredible work by Carianne and Rachel... @BernieSpofforth @dystopian_DU @wideawake_media @hugh_mankind @JamesMelville @WallStreetSilv @backtolife_2023 @TheChiefNerd @VigilantFox @LeilaniDowding @DrLoupis @KanekoaTheGreat @EndWokeness

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@BernieSpofforth @dystopian_DU @wideawake_media @hugh_mankind @JamesMelville @WallStreetSilv @backtolife_2023 @TheChiefNerd @VigilantFox @LeilaniDowding @DrLoupis @KanekoaTheGreat @EndWokeness If you want to follow the brilliant lady, Rachel Mathews, who made this speech... Here is her profile @SuccessfulGardn

Saved - August 1, 2023 at 12:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian broadcaster Cory Bernardi reveals how Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum plan to implement a carbon-based social credit system. This system aims to monitor and restrict every aspect of our lives, all in the name of combating the perceived global warming crisis. Learn more at wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #NetZero #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #KlausSchwab

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Australian broadcaster, Cory Bernardi, explains how Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum buddies intend to use a carbon footprint based social credit system to track and restrict every intricate detail of your life, under the guise of combatting the imaginary "global boiling crisis". Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6Iy-YrmDMX4… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #KlausSchwab

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for the Great Reset and the 4th Industrial Revolution, which includes a personal carbon social credit system to track everything individuals do. The WEF is encouraged by the global acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions and plans to use this to further their control. They are also using blockchain technology and central bank digital currencies to monitor activities. The WEF advocates for increased costs on carbon-intensive activities and reducing demand for certain things, potentially including meat, air travel, and family size. They want to set personal levels of acceptable emissions and redefine a fair share of emissions. Critics argue that this agenda is being implemented by design, with attacks on nation states and individuals who oppose it. Anglosphere leaders are pushing for global censorship and taxation, while celebrating movements that rely on deceit and chaos. The media largely reports the official interpretation of events, and these agents of change are willing to lie without fear of exposure. Despite all this, many people refuse to acknowledge what is happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our overlords at the World Economic Forum, we speak about them all the time here, they are still keen on transforming the world in their image via the great reset and the grandly titled 4th Industrial Revolution. And I have to say, they sound somewhat buoyant over how things are progressing thus far. See, right now, the w f are providing a platform for those pushing a my carbon initiative. And, okay, they'll describe it differently, but In my words, it's essentially a personal carbon social credit system that will track everything you do, everything you buy, everything you eat. It's like big brother. Now to understand why the WF are so happy, I'm gonna quote directly from their website. There it goes. COVID nineteen was the test of social responsibility. A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contract tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility. That's the w s words. And why wouldn't they be encouraged by that? I mean, the world accepted unimaginable restrictions with nary a whimper. Imagine, just imagine how that is going to embolden their next psyops projects as they attempt to enslave us all. And they're also boasting about their 4th Industrial Revolution. It's making progress, apparently. And they're using blockchain technology, likely, which will be integrated with central bank digital currencies to keep track of everything we do. But it's all to save the planet, of course. That's why, you see, they advocate increased costs for carbon intensive activities. Now, these activities are things like transport, construction, electricity, and the like. And they also wanna reduce demand for certain, quote, unspecified things. But I'm guessing they mean the important stuff that I just discussed that really builds a civilized society. But, of course, it could also include, say, meat, air travel, how how many children he can have. I mean, who knows how far they want to take this demand reduction in the name of decarbonizing the planet. And to top it all off, they want the setting of personal levels of acceptable omissions and a new definition of a fair share of personal omissions to enter the lexicon. Nothing to worry about there at all, is there? Now, if you are a conspiracy theorist, which is actually the name the Left give to those who can predict the future with remarkable accuracy, you might think this is all happening by design. I mean, the WEF have been upfront about their gender for us. WEF founder Klaus Schwab even wrote about it in a book entitled The Great Reset, That's where you'll own nothing and be happy. And we do see a global coordination of attacks on our way of life, on our customs, our morals and our values. Now, these attacks are levied on nation states as well who oppose this agenda by extraordinary and what I consider to be illegal sanctions of those governments and of individuals residing there. Our Anglosphere leaders, they're meant to be the ones representing the free world. Well, they're also pushing global censorship and global taxation. They are weaponizing law enforcement and tax collectors against those who resist. And these same leaders celebrate movements that rely on deceit and destruction and chaos to divide society while a Largely compliant media mostly report only the official interpretation of events. These agents of political change are now so emboldened, they will happily lie, and they seem to have no fear of being exposed. That's why they seem happy to misrepresent everything from war to science, from economics to biology, in order to condition you to actually accept what is unacceptable. Now, these things have been done before our very eyes and yet most people refuse to see it.
Saved - September 2, 2023 at 4:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
An anti-ULEZ group called Blade Runners is removing ULEZ cameras in London. 90 cameras in South East London have already been retired. London's Ultra Low Emission Zone charges up to £1750 daily for driving cars that don't meet emissions standards. Similar schemes are being implemented in other UK cities, restricting people's movement under the guise of combating climate change. Visit wideawakemedia.com for more content. #ULEZ #ClimateScam #NetZero #15MinuteCities

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

London, England: An anti-ULEZ vigilante group known as the "Blade Runners" has committed itself to removing or disabling every last ULEZ camera in London. 90% of the cameras in South East London have already been "retired". Within London's 'Ultra Low Emission Zone', people are charged a daily fee of up to £17.50 for driving cars that don't meet arbitrary "minimum emissions standards", essentially making driving an unaffordable luxury for people who are already struggling to make ends meet as a result of runaway inflation, extortionate energy bills and a cost of lockdowns crisis. Similar schemes are being rolled out in other major UK cities, in direct opposition to the democratic will of the people. All part of the Net Zero agenda to severely restrict people's freedom of movement—confining them to '15 minute cities' in the process—under the guise of combatting the non-existent "climate crisis". For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ULEZ #ULEZExpansion #ClimateScam #NetZero #15MinuteCities

Saved - September 6, 2023 at 10:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent video, Professor Norman Fenton criticizes the concept of 15 minute cities, claiming it restricts car usage and limits travel freedom. He argues that this idea lacks democratic support and aims to control people's movement. For more details, visit: wide-awake-media.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Professor Norman Fenton, on the tyrannical nature of 15 minute cities: "Nobody ever voted for this. People are not allowed to use their cars outside of their 15 minute 'zone' more than 100 times per year. The idea is essentially to stop you travelling wherever you want." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=kg77Ngzf754… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #15MinuteCities #ClimateScam #NetZero

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 and the challenges associated with it. They mention the need to transition to electric vehicles at a faster rate and create a resilient net zero economy. The focus is on accelerating the transition to a net zero economy by increasing private capital flows. The conversation then shifts to the UK's detailed plan for achieving a net zero economy, which includes closing most airports by 2030, eliminating air travel and shipping by 2050, and restricting road use, food, heating, and energy consumption to 60% of current levels by 2050. The speakers also mention the connection between these goals and other global initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna meet those goals and decarbonize our economies to reach net zero emissions by 2050. Speaker 1: We have to, transition to electric vehicles about 20 times faster than we are now. And we have to fully transition to a resilient Net zero economy faster. Speaker 2: Our goal is to accelerate the transition to a net zero economy, Particularly by boosting private capital flows. While the so called net zero economy is a goal of the American left, They haven't told the truth about how much pain it would take to actually get there. Well, luckily for us, the UK is revealing it All in stunning detail. Just how miserable your future actually could be, how restrictive and how freedom crushing your existence will be. Joining us now is someone who's broken this all down, Norman Fenton, professor emeritus of risk at Queen Mary University of London, professor. It is my pleasure to have you on the show tonight. I was so taken by your analysis that I was dying to have you on. So I wanna begin with this chart showing What would be required in terms of of air travel and driving in order to achieve This so called net zero goal. Explain this. Speaker 3: Well, the key thing is that when they talk about net zero, they really mean absolute zero because Net zero, they're talking about all greenhouse gas emissions, including methane being less of those than removals. And since there's no large scale Capture removal technology evade well than the tree planting. Net zero actually means that you've gotta get rid of those, emissions completely. So in order to achieve that, Given that we don't have the technology for the, capture and removal, you've got to do things like they're saying in this. They're being very realistic. They're saying that All airports except Heathrow, Belfast, and Glasgow in the UK. So all but 3 UK airports to close by 2030. And no flying at all by 2050. No shipping at all. 2 yeah. No shipping at all by 2050. Because the whole idea is until you then get, you know, electric air you know, until you can actually have airplanes powered by electricity or nuclear, then Then, you know, then you you've got to eliminate it completely. No new petrol or diesel cars by 2030. And by 2050, Road use is to be restricted by 60% of today's level. Food, heating, and energy also restricted to 60% of the tank's level by 2050. And beef and lamb to be phased out by 2050. And, of course, this this fits Very much with all of these sort of the World Economic Forum, Great Reset, UN Agenda 21, objectives, you know, that you'll, Yeah. You're gonna be buds, but, yeah, you're gonna you're gonna be happy. So, yeah. This this is what it's all about. Speaker 2: Well, I know, professor. Professor, we know that the elites, They're gonna have plenty of beef and lamb. They're gonna have they're gonna be able to fly anywhere they wanna go. They're gonna be able to travel as much as they want.
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 8:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The alleged climate change hoax is seen as a means for globalist bodies like the United Nations to gain total control over our lives, all in the name of saving the planet. The documentary "Unsustainable: The UN's Agenda for World Domination" delves into this issue. Find the full documentary and more content at wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

The human-induced climate change hoax is a trojan horse through which unelected globalist bodies such as the United Nations, are attempting to seize totalitarian control over every minute detail of our lives, under the pretext of "saving the planet". From the documentary, 'Unsustainable: The UN's Agenda For World Domination'. Watch the full documentary here: https://wide-awake-media.com/unsustainable-the-un-agenda-for-world-domination For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that a substantial part of global warming is explained by natural factors, such as increased sunlight leading to evaporation and the greenhouse effect caused by water vapor. They claim that water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas, while carbon dioxide is secondary or tertiary. Other speakers suggest that fluctuations in the sun's output are responsible for the warming of the entire solar system, including Earth. They also mention data collected from Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune. The speakers question the role of human activity in climate change, pointing out that temperature increases have been observed on planets without human presence. They criticize the United Nations for using climate change as a means to gain control and justify central planning. The solution proposed by the speakers is less government control and more freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you study this very, very carefully and you ignore all the politics, that's what science is supposed to do, and you don't get your hand tied and your mouth completely controlled by the UN mouthpiece, then you will reach the conclusion that quite a substantial part is actually explained by natural component. The more sunlight you have, you will warm. You will evaporate more. And then you will evaporate water vapor. That causes the greenhouse effect. Water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas versus see o two, which is always known in any textbook as a secondary or tertiary greenhouse gas. Speaker 1: Some astronomers tell us global warming has nothing to do with human activity or fossil fuel driven industrialization. The entire solar system is warming up Due to fluctuations in the sun's coronal output. Speaker 2: Carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is a cycle that is driven almost entirely buy our sun and has very little to do with human activity. We have collected data from Mars, from Jupiter, from even, out in Neptune. Speaker 0: We have actually showed that the sun, for has melt the Mars ice cap. The sun is warming the solar whole solar system. And it so happened that earth is one of the inhabitants of the solar system, period. Speaker 3: We don't see a lot of climate scientists and those talking about climate Change in global warming mentioning the fact that there is a proportional increase in temperature On planets where there are no people. Speaker 1: A number of years back, we had climatologists tell us that the world was not warming. It was cooling due to the dimming effect of particulate matter in the atmosphere. With this discovery, the term global warming was converted into the term climate change. Talk about hedging your bets. Speaker 4: Look at the question of particulate matter in the atmosphere. What is the effect of that? How much of it? Where is it moving? What is it? What kind of things are it? Volcanoes. Volcanoes emit Carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide. Think of all the elements in compounds They're admitted. What is that effect? Speaker 1: Whether or not climate change is an existential threat, The United Nations is marching forward and using it to justify the central planning of not only the land, air, and water, but all resources, plants, animals and humans on the planet. As we discussed earlier, Speaker 2: the global elitist who are currently in power want people to believe that, carbon dioxide in our atmosphere first is a tremendous problem. And secondly, they want us to believe that the cycle of the amount of carbon dioxide that happens to be in the in concentrations in our atmosphere is driven by human activity. The real problem here is That there's a political driving force behind what they call climate change, Speaker 4: which is once again the desire of the UN Through their general sustainable development theories to gain increasing control over the way industrial society operates, Then you really have a kind of a stranglehold on every country in which the United Nations can exercise this kind of power. Speaker 5: And that is why most governments around the world, because all of them have their totalitarian streak, have gone along so gladly and so readily With the story line that global warming is going to happen at a rate sufficient to cause danger. And only the government can save the environment from the people. Speaker 2: The solution is always more government control, more taxes, and less freedom for you.
Saved - September 11, 2023 at 3:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Unelected globalists like Klaus Schwab aim to outlaw private vehicle ownership by 2030. They envision 15 minute cities and travel restrictions based on social credit scores, aligning with the WEF's Great Reset and UN Agenda 2030. ClimateScam, WorldEconomicForum, GreatReset, UnitedNations, Agenda2030, 15MinuteCities, ULEZ.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Katie Hopkins: If unelected globalists like Klaus Schwab have their way, by 2030, private vehicle ownership will be outlawed, people will be confined to 15 minute cities, and your ability to travel will be determined by your social credit score—all in line with the WEF's 'Great Reset' and UN Agenda 2030. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=X9aw9j7srg4… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #KlausSchwab #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #UnitedNations #Agenda2030 #15MinuteCities #ULEZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Wales, a new law will enforce a default speed limit of 20 miles per hour in areas previously set at 30 miles per hour. The aim is to reduce noise emissions and promote cycling or public transport. However, this reasoning seems flawed. It raises concerns for the elderly and parents with young children who may struggle to walk or cycle. The real motive behind this change appears to be discouraging car usage and eventually eliminating private vehicle ownership in the UK. Similar restrictions on motorways are justified by environmental targets, but the true intention is to dissuade private vehicle use. Even electric cars won't be a long-term solution, as a countrywide electric fleet will be summoned through an app and eventually restricted. This aligns with the conditioning seen during COVID lockdowns, where limited travel distances and social credits may become the norm. Wales provides a glimpse into a larger strategic plan at play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may have heard that in Wales, there is a new law going to be enforced that says, where there was formerly 30 miles an hour, the default speed setting in those 30 mile an hour zones will be 20 miles an hour. I don't know if you've ever driven your car at 20 miles an hour, but it literally she feels as if you're going backwards. They say the idea is to lower noise emissions and to encourage people to cycle or to take public transport to recognize that a car isn't the fastest option. I mean, the absurdity of all of that rationale is obvious, but like, what are people going to do? Drive up to the 20 miles an hour zone, park their car, get out, walk that bit and then, what, realize that they've left their car the other side of it? How does this work for the elderly who can't walk or bicycle wherever they feel like it. And what about moms with small kids in strollers? Are they supposed to just, what, throw them on their shoulder and get on the bike? I also think it's really disingenuous to keep kind of explaining this stuff away with false rationale that has nothing to do with the real reason behind it. I heard a lady on the radio say, well, if fuel prices continue to go up, people will be put off from using their cars. And that's exactly clearly the point. That's the real strategy behind all of this, to make it as inconvenient as possible to use your car in order that you change your behavior and we begin the process of taking away the right to own a private vehicle here in the UK. I believe, and I believe it's absolutely the strategic plan, that nobody in the UK will own a private parked within 5 years, I don't believe you will have the right to do that. It also helps explain things like 20, 30 miles of restricted speeds. On motorways, people are asking, why is it 60 miles an hour? Why is it 50 miles an hour? And you'll be told, oh, emissions or greener targets. But in fact, it's all about dissuading you from using the private vehicle. And for people who say, oh yes, but electric's the answer, not one day it won't be because there'll be a countrywide electric fleet. You will have to summon it using an app and eventually that will be restricted as well. Going back to COVID and that whole restricted radius that you were allowed to live in 5 kilometers from your home address, it's not too hard to see how that was some early conditioning for a time when not only do you not have the freedom to own a vehicle, not only do you not have the freedom to drive, but you no longer have the freedom to go more than 5 kilometers from your home address, then undoubtedly, you'd have had to have earned social credits in order to be able to do exactly that. Wales is just another glimpse of this bigger strategic plan that's in play.
Saved - September 16, 2023 at 1:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Net zero emissions criticized as a fraud and scam. Australian senator warns of the consequences: half the world's food relies on fossil fuels. Without gas, starvation looms. Is this the start of a global revolt against Net Zero? Source: https://aph.gov.au/NewsandEvents/Watch_Read_Listen/ParlView/video/1701277. More content at wideawakemedia.com. #ClimateScam #NetZero

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

"Net zero emissions is a fraud and a scam". Australian senator, Matt Canavan, drops some serious Net Zero truth bombs in the Australian parliament: "Half the world's food comes [nitrogen fertiliser] made from natural gas... How are we going to grow food for half the world's population if we have Net Zero, and we don't have gas? It's very easy to say 'let's just have net zero emissions'. Well it's not, because almost everything we grow, we make, we do in our society relies on the use of fossil fuels, and without them, people will starve." Are we witnessing the beginnings of a global popular revolt against Net Zero tyranny? Source: https://aph.gov.au/News_and_Events/Watch_Read_Listen/ParlView/video/1701277 For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero

Video Transcript AI Summary
Advocates for NetZero need to address the practicalities of achieving it. Without fossil fuels, which are used in almost everything we do, including food production, transportation, and job creation, it's not feasible. The goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is unrealistic and has not been successful so far, as global carbon emissions have actually increased. This policy benefits countries like China, India, and Russia, who don't follow the rules, at the expense of Western nations. Eventually, this will lead to anger and frustration when net zero emissions cannot be achieved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The one thing I'd love people who advocate for NetZero to say in this debate, I'd like someone, someone just to map out the situation. And so we're going to see the opportunity to see the next generation of the world. And so we have a very strong foundation for the world. And so we have a very strong foundation for the comes from the fertilisers made from urea. Now it is made from natural gas. How are we going to make you make urea? How are we going to grow food for half the world's population if we have net zero and we don't have gas. I mean, it's very easy to say net zero. It's very easy to say, look, let's just have met 0 emissions. It's easy, isn't it? Well, it's not because almost everything we grow, we make, we do in our society relies on the use of fossil fuels. And without them, without them, people will start. Without fossil fuels, we won't be able to go anywhere. Without fossil fuels, people will not have a lot of people will not have jobs. And so just answer just answering those basic questions would be really, really helpful. This is the most crazy policy that any governments have ever adopted. We want to fundamentally change how we make, grow and travel within a generation. 2050, which is what they want to do, net zero emissions by, is just 27 years away. And And so I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. I think that's the point. As well. But what's happened since since the world's tied up to net zero emissions at Glasgow in late 2021? What's happened there since then? Global carbon emissions have gone they've gone up, not down. They're out of house, haven't we? We're trying to do the right well, so called right thing. But China, India, one. And so I think that's the reason why we're doing this is a fraud and a scam, is a total fraudulent scam which allows countries like China and India and Russia who don't play by the rules in the world game. It allows them to get off scot free and then take the jobs from Western countries. This is a massive transfer of wealth and prosperity from our nations, from our country, from our people, to those countries who never and will not play by the rules. We are absolute mugs to fall for this scam, but we're doing it time and time again. Now eventually, it'll end in tears because they won't be able to reach net zero emissions. And what is gonna happen then? People will be very, very angry.
Saved - September 20, 2023 at 10:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Australian senator Ralph Babet exposes the fraudulent nature of Net Zero in parliament, calling it a scam that benefits globalists and the CCP. For more details, visit wide-awake-media.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Australian senator, Ralph Babet, highlights the ludicrous and fraudulent nature of Net Zero, in the Australian parliament. "Net Zero is a complete and utter scam, designed to shut down our nation, enrich predatory globalists and the CCP. That is all it's going to do." Source: https://aph.gov.au/News_and_Events/Watch_Read_Listen/ParlView/video/1701277 For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero

Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to the world of net zero, brought to you by various political parties. Let me introduce you to the LDV ET60, an electric car available in Australia for around $93. However, it has limitations such as a towing capacity of 1,000 kilograms and a range of under 200 kilometers when carrying a load. It may not be suitable for camping or boating trips. Additionally, while it claims to be carbon neutral, it overlooks the environmental impact of its production and the fossil fuels used to charge it. Net zero is seen as a scam that aims to shut down our nation and benefit globalists and the CCP.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now to all the Australian farmers, miners, and tradies out there, I'd like to welcome you to the dystopian world of net zero, a world brought to you by the Liberals, Nationals, Labour, and the Greens. Now let me inform you of the wonders of the only electric used currently available for sale in Australia for 90 $3, nearly $93 plus on road cost. You can drive away in a brand new made in China LDV ET60. Doesn't that just town appealing. Are you dreaming of weekends away camping, caravanning, or boating? Forget it. This beauty has a towing limit of 1,000 kilograms and is only available in 2 wheel drive with a range of under 200 kilometers when towing or carrying a load. Now instead of asking the salesman, the salesman for free floor mats, better ask you to throw in a free diesel generator and a jerry can. How's about that one instead? Not convinced? Here is the kicker. It's carbon neutral. How good is that, right? As long as you ignore the 3,000 kilograms of Steel, Copper, Lithium, Nickel, Manganese, Cobalt, Graphite, Zinc and all the rest of it. And don't forget to turn a blind eye to the coal fired power used in the Chinese factory, the diesel trains, the trucks, the kits that are used for transport, and the fossil fuels that you're gonna use when you charge it at night in the comfort of your own garage here in Australia. Now Vertu's signaling, you know what it is, it's an expensive business. We got to reject net zero because it makes net zero cents. Net zero is a total and complete and utter scam designed to shut down our nation, enrich Predatory Globalists and the CCP. That is all it's going to do.
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 5:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a revealing video, Australian broadcaster Cory Bernardi exposes Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum's plan to control every aspect of our lives through a carbon-based social credit system. This scheme, disguised as climate crisis management, raises concerns about personal freedom. For more, visit wide-awake-media.com.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Australian broadcaster, Cory Bernardi, explains how Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum buddies intend to use a carbon footprint based social credit system to control every minute detail of your life, under the guise of tackling the imaginary "climate crisis". Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6Iy-YrmDMX4… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset #KlausSchwab

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing for a personal carbon social credit system that tracks everything people do, buy, and eat. They are encouraged by the global acceptance of COVID-19 restrictions and plan to use this to further their control over society. The WEF is also promoting their 4th Industrial Revolution, which utilizes blockchain technology and central bank digital currencies to monitor all activities. They advocate for increased costs on carbon-intensive activities and reducing demand for certain things, potentially including meat, air travel, and family size. They want to set personal levels of acceptable emissions and redefine a fair share of emissions. These actions are part of a larger agenda to reshape society, with global censorship, taxation, and attacks on opposing governments and individuals. Despite these developments, many people remain unaware or refuse to acknowledge them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our overlords at the World Economic Forum, we speak about them all the time here, they are still keen on transforming the world in their image via the great reset and the grandly titled 4th Industrial Revolution. And I have to say, they sound somewhat buoyant over how things are progressing thus far. See, right now, the w f are providing a platform for those pushing a my carbon initiative. And, okay, they'll describe it differently, but In my words, it's essentially a personal carbon social credit system that will track everything you do, everything you buy, everything you eat. It's like big brother. Now to understand why the WF are so happy, I'm gonna quote directly from their website. There it goes. COVID nineteen was the test of social responsibility. A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world. There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contract tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility. That's the w s words. And why wouldn't they be encouraged by that? I mean, the world accepted unimaginable restrictions with nary a whimper. Imagine, just imagine how that is going to embolden their next psyops projects as they attempt to enslave us all. And they're also boasting about their 4th Industrial Revolution. It's making progress, apparently. And they're using blockchain technology, likely, which will be integrated with central bank digital currencies to keep track of everything we do. But it's all to save the planet, of course. That's why, you see, they advocate increased costs for carbon intensive activities. Now, these activities are things like transport, construction, electricity, and the like. And they also wanna reduce demand for certain, quote, unspecified things. But I'm guessing they mean the important stuff that I just discussed that really builds a civilized society. But, of course, it could also include, say, meat, air travel, how how many children he can have. I mean, who knows how far they want to take this demand reduction in the name of decarbonizing the planet. And to top it all off, they want the setting of personal levels of acceptable omissions and a new definition of a fair share of personal omissions to enter the lexicon. Nothing to worry about there at all, is there? Now, if you are a conspiracy theorist, which is actually the name the Left give to those who can predict the future with remarkable accuracy, you might think this is all happening by design. I mean, the WEF have been upfront about their gender for us. WEF founder Klaus Schwab even wrote about it in a book entitled The Great Reset, That's where you'll own nothing and be happy. And we do see a global coordination of attacks on our way of life, on our customs, our morals and our values. Now, these attacks are levied on nation states as well who oppose this agenda by extraordinary and what I consider to be illegal sanctions of those governments and of individuals residing there. Our Anglosphere leaders, they're meant to be the ones representing the free world. Well, they're also pushing global censorship and global taxation. They are weaponizing law enforcement and tax collectors against those who resist. And these same leaders celebrate movements that rely on deceit and destruction and chaos to divide society while a Largely compliant media mostly report only the official interpretation of events. These agents of political change are now so emboldened, they will happily lie, and they seem to have no fear of being exposed. That's why they seem happy to misrepresent everything from war to science, from economics to biology, in order to condition you to actually accept what is unacceptable. Now, these things have been done before our very eyes and yet most people refuse to see it.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 5:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Is the UN and WEF's Agenda 2030 a threat to private property? A must-watch video exposes their intentions. We must resist and refuse to accept this. Visit wide-awake-media.com for more eye-opening content. #ClimateScam #NetZero

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

MUST-WATCH: Is this how unelected globalists at the UN and WEF intend to take away your private property, under the banner of Agenda 2030? "We must be disobedient now. We must put our foot down and refuse to accept this. Because we are many, they are few." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y2sqV7alDz8… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #Agenda21 #Agenda2030

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government will soon send letters requiring homeowners to make costly improvements to their houses, while landlords will increase rent due to rising costs. This is a result of the energy performance of buildings directive, which aims to have all privately owned houses at energy class d by 2033 and zero emission homes by 2050. The estimated cost per house is around €100,000, forcing many to sell. This threatens the middle class and could lead to a feudal system, with big international companies seizing properties. It is crucial to resist and refuse to accept this wealth transfer, as ownership is essential. Disobedience is necessary, despite the consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very soon now your government will, send you a letter. And in that letter it will basically say that, you're going to have to make some improvements to your house and you're going to pay for that out of your own pocket as well. If if you are renting your, your landlord will be sending you a letter where it says that due to increased costs. We're going to have to increase the monthly rent. What we're talking about here is something with a very boring name. I made made a note here it's called energy performance of buildings directive. That's in the EU. Now if you live outside of Europe, this will probably in a very short while be a thing in your country as well. This is something that comes out of the world economic forum and, you know, the great reset and agenda 2030 and all of that. And basically, the idea is that all privately owned houses must have energy class d before 2033. By 2050, all homes must be zero emission homes. When it comes to the cost, I made a note here about the calculations that these people have made. We are talking about costs per house of well in most cases around €100,000. And here's the thing, many people will not be able to pay €100,000. They will be forced to sell. Can you remember a while ago, this, slogan that also came out to the world economic forum. You will own nothing and you will be happy. Isn't it funny how this so called green agenda seems to make everything more difficult and more expensive. It seems like we will not be able to own a house because we can't afford it. You will be forced to rent. You will be at mercy of the company probably that owns your your flat. Another issue here is of course that if you're forced to sell will you even be allowed to sell a house that is not up to this standard will there be a fine will they just take your house. Now this is obviously an attack on the middle class we have seen, quite a lot of those lately. I believe that home ownership is what defines the middle class. And if you take that away and if you make that standard of living that most people associate with the middle class, if make that too expensive for most people then effectively you have killed the middle class. Then you have the very rich and you have the poor. And, we will be very, very close to a feudal system or feudalism two point o as I have, nicknamed it. I believe that big international companies will seize these, properties most likely and I believe that, home ownership sadly very soon will be a thing of the past for most people. And it doesn't matter if you believe that this will be good for the environment or not. This is about controlling you. This is about owning you. And there is actually something that we can do. And I want to say there is something that we must do. It's not that we can do something about this. We must. It's an obligation. We must be disobedient now. We can't accept this. And this taking away houses from people because they can't afford the so called upgrading of the house to a certain standard with additional insulation and solar panels and I don't know what. That's not really an upgrade, is it? It's it's about making it impossible for people to keep their house. This is a wealth transfer. That's what we're looking at now. And we can't accept that. Ownership is important. It's a very, very essential concept. And some people will disagree when I say this, but if you take ownership away. What you're left with is. Someone's going to own the stuff that you need. And they will be the, the so called elites. So we must be disobedient now, we must put our foot down and refuse to accept this. And there will be consequences, there will be a price that you must pay, that I will pay, that we must all pay. But if we all refuse to accept this and whatever comes next. It will eventually stop because
Saved - October 8, 2023 at 11:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN and WEF are using the "human-induced climate change" narrative to control our lives through Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. A new documentary called 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' exposes this. Watch it here: [link]. For more content, visit: [link].

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Unelected globalist totalitarians at the UN and WEF are using the fraudulent "human-induced climate change" narrative as a pretext to micromanage and control every intricate detail of our lives, under the banner of Agenda 21 (which later evolved into Agenda 2030)—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' Watch the full documentary: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #NoFarmersNoFood #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030

Video Transcript AI Summary
Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers argue that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago. The policy, known as Agenda 21, aims to achieve 17 sustainable development goals by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive state control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, a major meat exporter, is even shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the new WEF Net 0 agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world. And if you listen to world leaders, they'll tell you it's due to climate change. And their solution might surprise you. Speaker 1: There are 1900 edible insect species on the planet. Speaker 0: According to the United Nations, This might actually be your future dinner. The people in charge of some of the most powerful organizations on planet have determined that agriculture, specifically animal agriculture is to blame for global warming. And global warming is to blame for the high prices of food as well as food shortages. And so by switching our diets from beef, chicken, and pork, to crickets, and some meal worms, we'll be able to stop temperatures from lower the price of food and possibly to even save the planet. However, on this show, we've spent a lot of time speaking with these food providers, aka farmers. John, thank you so much for joining us. And their story is very different. Their story suggests that these high food prices and these food shortages have little to do with global warming. But instead, they are the direct result of an environmental policy that was conceived over 30 years ago. California's Speaker 1: record. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act as this is known, present this with an opportunity to follow-up on the important work of the Earth summit to develop its blueprint agenda 21 for global environmental action. Speaker 2: If you read it, we're talking hundreds of pages, governing really every facet of life, everything from education to land use policy to economics to law. Every area of life was bound up in there. Speaker 0: At the end of 'twenty one, the United Nations' master plan for humanity was enacted in the Through this policy, the United Nations has established 17 sustainable development goals, things like ending poverty and gender equality, These 17 STGs are then broken into 169 individual targets, all to be reached by every nation on Earth by the year 2030. Can it be done? Likely not, but it's good to have goals. Right? Speaker 2: There is absolutely no way for the sustainable development goals to be implemented to be tracked to be monitored without the total obliteration of individual freedom. Some of the goals sound nice, ending hunger. Who could possibly be against ending hunger? The problem is when you set a nebulous goal like that, it requires total power from the state to be able to accomplish that. And, of course, they will never accomplish that, right? There's no way to literally eradicate all poverty from the face of the earth, but it gives government and global institutions like the UN an easy excuse to basically do whatever they want under the guise of Speaker 0: without micromanaging every aspect of our lives. And obviously, that includes food production. And since food is produced literally everywhere in the world, well, the only way to cover the story is to travel the world and to speak with the farmers who are being hit hardest by this agenda. Relapsing the current order in order to compose their new order, look at the Netherlands, their prime minister, allows his country under court order to go with this new WEF Net 0 agenda of stopping modern agriculture. Netherlands is the biggest exporter of meat in Europe. They're shutting down not the big corporate farms. They're shutting down the small and middle sized thing
Saved - October 10, 2023 at 10:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN and WEF are using the "human-induced climate change" narrative to control our lives through Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. A new documentary called 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' exposes this. Watch it here: [link]. For more content, visit: [link].

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Unelected globalist totalitarians at the UN and WEF are using the fraudulent "human-induced climate change" narrative as a pretext to micromanage and control every intricate detail of our lives, under the banner of Agenda 21 (which later evolved into Agenda 2030)—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' Watch the full documentary: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #NoFarmersNoFood #UnitedNations #Agenda21 #Agenda2030

Video Transcript AI Summary
Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers have a different perspective. They believe that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago called Agenda 21, now known as Agenda 2030. This policy sets 17 sustainable development goals with 169 targets to be achieved by every nation by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive government control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, for example, is shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the net-zero agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world. And if you listen to world leaders, they'll tell you it's due to climate change. And their solutions might surprise you. Speaker 1: There are 1900 edible insect species on the planet. Speaker 0: According to the United Nations, This might actually be your future dinner. Let me explain. The people in charge of some of the most powerful organizations on the Planets have determined that agriculture, specifically animal agriculture, is to blame for global warming. And global warming is to blame for the high prices of food as well as food shortages. And so, by switching our diets from beef, chicken, and pork to crickets, ants, and mealworms, we'll be able to stop temperatures from Lower the price of food, and possibly to even save the planet. However, on this show, we've spent a lot of time speaking with the food providers, AKA the Farmers. John, thank you so much for joining us. And their story is very different. Their story suggests that these high food prices and these food shortages Have little to do with global warming, but instead, they are the direct result of an environmental policy that was conceived over 30 years ago. Gentlemen from California is recognized. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister speaker. The Earth Summit Environmental Leadership Act This is known. Present us with an opportunity to follow-up on the important work of the Earth Summit to develop its blueprint, agenda 21 For global environmental Speaker 2: action. Agenda 21 was meant to be the agenda for the 21st century. Very comprehensive document. If you read it, we're we're talking hundreds of pages governing really every facet of life, everything from education to land use policy, to Economics to law, every area of life was bound up in Speaker 0: there. Agenda 21, the United Nations master plan for humanity was enacted in the year 2000. Today, it's more commonly referred to as agenda 2030, as in the year 2030. Through this policy, the United Nations has established 17 sustainable development goals. Things like ending poverty and gender equality. These 17 STGs are then broken into 169 individual targets, all to be reached by every nation on earth by the year 2030. Can it be done? Likely not. But it's good to have goals, right? Speaker 2: There is absolutely no way for the sustainable development goals to be implemented, to be tracked, to be monitored without the total obliteration of individual freedom. Some of the goals sound nice. Ending hunger. Who could possibly be against ending hunger? The problem is when you set a nebulous goal like that, it requires Total power from the state to be able to accomplish that. And, of course, they will never accomplish that. Right? There's no way to literally eradicate all poverty From the face of the earth, but it gives government and global institutions like the UN an easy excuse to basically do whatever they want Under the guise of meeting these Speaker 0: goals. It's true. How can government possibly reach all of these sustainable development goals without micromanaging every aspect of our lives. And obviously, that includes food production. And since food is produced literally everywhere in the world, well, the only way to cover this story is to travel the world, and to speak with the farmers who are being hit hardest by this agenda. Collapsing the current order in order to compose their new order. Look at the Netherlands, their prime minister Allows this country under court order to go with this new WEF net zero agenda of stopping modern agriculture. The Netherlands is the biggest exporter of meat in Europe. They're shutting down not the big corporate farms. They're shutting down the small and middle sized
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 5:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dutch commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek claims that unelected globalists are using the guise of reducing nitrogen emissions to control the global farming industry. Their aim is to push for insect and lab-grown "meat" consumption, promoting a one-world government under UN Agenda 2030. Vlaardingerbroek argues that these globalists want to dictate what we eat, where we travel, and how we spend our money, ultimately weakening and controlling us. Watch her full talk for more details.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Dutch political commentator, Eva Vlaardingerbroek: Unelected globalists are using the pretext of "reducing nitrogen emissions" to shut down the global farming industry, so people will have no choice but to eat insects and lab-grown "meat", under the banner of UN Agenda 2030. "The people behind this want to establish a one world government, a 'New World Order', in which they decide what we eat, when we eat, where we travel, when we travel, who we meet, and what we are allowed to spend our money on. Basically, control over every single aspect of our lives." "They don't want us to eat foods that make us strong. They want us to eat synthetic meat created by Bill Gates. They want us to eat bugs, they want us to drink soy milk, so that we become weak and obedient, and we do as they say." Full talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fr8eV5oQyyI Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://www.wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #UnitedNations #Agenda2030

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands is a manufactured pretext created by bureaucrats in The Hague and Brussels. They argue that this crisis is being used as a strategy by globalists to control and manipulate farmers, with the ultimate goal of establishing a one world government. The speaker highlights the 2030 agenda, a United Nations initiative consisting of 17 sustainable development goals, and suggests that achieving these goals would require a forceful redistribution of goods, property, and rights, leading to the obliteration of basic liberties. The speaker believes that farmers are being targeted because the globalists want to change our way of life and control what we eat, promoting synthetic meat and insect consumption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2019, the courts ruled that the Netherlands was actively in a nitrogen crisis. And that ruling has been the basis for our governments to crack down on our farmers' rights and even move towards expropriation of their land. The nitrogen crisis does not exist. It's a pretext. It's a lie. The nitrogen crisis is a manufactured crisis created by bureaucrats in The Hague and in Brussels. The attack on farming in the Netherlands is part of a bigger global agenda that is centered around control. In fact, it's the typical, I would say, the typical globalist strategy. They create a crisis. Boy, have we seen that in the past few years. You know what that looks like. They create a crisis, and then they say, well, and the answer to this crisis, the solution to this crisis is you giving up You're right. Not us, but you. And that's exactly what is happening here with the Dutch farmers. So remember how I said earlier in this speech that, the farmers need to give up their their farms before 2030, specifically that year? Yeah. So that's not a coincidence. That year doesn't come out of nowhere. So that year is basically the deadline that our global elites have given our country and will probably give you, to abide by these new regulations. And that agenda is called the 2030 agenda. And now I have a slide showing you what that entails. So the 2030 agenda is a United Nations agenda. So there we go. Everybody is part of the United Nations. Right? The entire world. And this agenda consists of 17 what they call sustainable development goals. And when you take a look at them right there, you're like, Well, what's wrong with that? You know, they all seem very noble. No poverty, no hunger. Who could be against that? However, if we take a closer look at how they actually want to accomplish all of this, anybody with 2 functioning brain cells realizes that this cannot happen unless there is an active and maybe even forceful redistribution of goods, foods, property, and our rights, which basically comes down to the obliteration of all of our basic liberties, and our rights. And these goals, as I said, are not restricted solely to the Netherlands. They are global, and that's where we see their true motive. The people behind this want to establish a one world government, a new world order in which they decide what we eat, When we eat, where we travel, when we travel, who we meet, and what we are allowed spend our money on. Basically, control over every single aspect of our lives. And I'm sure that many of you have heard the the famous Sentence from Klaus Schwab, you know, where he says, you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. Right? Yeah. That's this agenda. So why are the people behind this agenda specifically targeting farmers? Well, it's because, obviously, they really want our way of life and the things that we eat to radically change. They don't want us to eat foods that make us strong. They want us to eat synthetic meat created by Bill Gates. They want us to eat bugs. They want us to drink soy milk so that we become weak and obedient, and we do as they say, and we buy what they offer.
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 4:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
German MEP Christine Anderson warns that the concept of 15-minute cities could be used to enforce climate lockdowns, leading to the impoverishment and enslavement of people. She emphasizes that this is not about convenience or saving the planet, but rather a step towards digital tyranny. To learn more, watch the full interview on The Epoch Times website. For similar content, visit Wide Awake Media.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

"It will be a complete impoverishment and enslavement of all the people." German MEP, Christine Anderson, explains how 15 minute cities will be used to enforce climate lockdowns. "Make no mistake: it's not about your convenience. And it's not about saving the planet, either... They will be able to impose a climate lockdown. That's the next step... In order to do that, they will have to have these 15 minute cities." Watch the full interview: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/christine-anderson-from-15-minute-cities-to-climate-lockdowns-the-onslaught-of-digital-tyranny-5214622?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #15MinuteCities

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of 15 minute cities, which are areas where everything you need is within a 15-minute walk. They claim that this idea is not about convenience or saving the planet, but rather a way for authorities to control and lock down people. They mention that some places have already passed legislation to impose climate lockdowns. The speaker suggests that in the future, people may only be allowed to leave their immediate area a few times a year, with wealthier individuals being able to buy passes to travel more freely. They also mention a city being built in Saudi Arabia that could potentially house millions of people and be used for control. The speaker concludes by stating that all of these measures will lead to the complete enslavement of the population.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm very curious what your opinion is on, 15 minute cities. This is something that, I guess it's a new idea that we're only beginning to to hear about. Maybe you can actually remind us what what they are, and I and I understand they're coming in Europe now. There's legislation pushing in that direction already. Speaker 1: Yes, it is. The digital green certificate, the COVID pass, that was a test balloon to get people To having to produce some kind of a QR code, you know, just getting people used to that. Now what they're slamming us with is these 15 minute cities. Make no mistake. It's not about your convenience. It's not that they want you to be able to, you know, have all of these places that you need to get to very close. And it's not about saving the planet either, by the way. The 15 minute cities, they will have to have those before they can lock you down. And that's what we're talking about here. So in Great Britain, some county already passed legislation. They will be able to impose a climate lockdown. That's the next step. That's what we're talking about. So in order to do that, they will have to have these 15 minute cities. The next step then, of course, will be, you are only allowed to leave your immediate area for, let's say, 2 or 3 times a year. So but there's other people that may have more money and they can they can actually buy your, passings off of you. So guess what? The poor people will be left in these 15 minute neighbourhoods while the ones that are better off, get to go wherever they want to go. So this is what we're talking about, you know? Look at Saudi Arabia, for instance. They are pulling up Neom City. They call it the line. So this is like a structure in the middle of a desert, 200 kilometers long, 200 meters wide, 500 meters High. And it will house up to 9,000,000 people. Oh, isn't that just brilliant? If I wanted to get total control Of the people. That's exactly where and how I would house them. And then having them on a 3 me 3 meals a day prescription? Well, guess what will happen if you do not do as you are told? They will probably cancel that. It's so easy. So that's what we're talking about. And, when you really take all of this together, There is no other way for me to to actually say this. It will be a complete And enslavement of all the people.
Christine Anderson: From 15-Minute Cities to Climate Lockdowns, the Onslaught of Digital Tyranny theepochtimes.com
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Is the UN and WEF using Net Zero/Agenda 2030 to seize private property? We must resist this globalist agenda. Watch the video and join the movement. Visit our website for more content. #ClimateScam #NetZero

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

MUST-WATCH: Is this how unelected globalists at the UN and WEF intend to take away your private property, under the banner of Net Zero/Agenda 2030? "We must be disobedient now. We must put our foot down and refuse to accept this. Because we are many, they are few." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y2sqV7alDz8 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government will soon send letters requiring homeowners to make costly improvements to their houses, while landlords will increase rent due to rising costs. This is a result of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, which aims to have all privately owned houses at energy class D by 2033 and zero emission homes by 2050. The estimated cost per house is around €100,000, making it unaffordable for many. This could lead to forced selling and a shift towards renting, eroding middle-class home ownership. It may also result in big companies seizing properties, creating a feudalistic system. This is seen as a control tactic rather than an environmental initiative, and disobedience is urged to protect ownership rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very soon now your government will, send you a letter. And in that letter, it will basically say that, you're going to have to make some improvements to your house and you're going to pay for that out of your own pocket as well. If you are renting, your, your landlord will be sending you a letter where it says that due to increased costs, we're going to have to increase the monthly rent. What we're talking about here is something with a very boring name. I made made a note here. It's called Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. That's in the EU. Now, if you live outside of Europe, this will probably, in a very short while, be a thing in your country as well. This is something that comes out of the World Economic Forum, and, you know, the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 and all of that. And, basically, the idea is that all privately owned houses, must have energy class D, before 2033. By 2050, all homes must be zero emission homes. When it comes to the costs, I made a note here, about the calculations that these people have made. We are talking about costs per house of, well in most cases around €100,000. And here's the thing, many people will not be able to pay €100,000. They will be forced to sell. Can you remember a while ago, this slogan that also came out of the World Economic Forum, you will own nothing and you will be happy. Isn't it funny how this so called green agenda seems to make everything more difficult and more expensive? It seems like we will not be able to own a house because we can't afford it. You will be forced to rent. You will be at mercy of the company, probably, that owns your your flat. Another issue here is, of course, that if you're forced to sell, will you even be allowed to sell a house that is not up to this standard. Will there be a fine? Will they just take your house? Now, this is obviously an attack on the middle class, and we have seen, quite a lot of those lately. I believe that home ownership is what defines the middle class, and if you take that away, and if you make that standard of living that most people associate with the middle class, if if you make that too expensive for most people, then effectively you have killed the middle class. Then you have the very rich, and you have the poor. And, we will be very very close to a feudal system, or feudalism two point zero as I have nicknamed it. I believe that big international companies will seize these properties, most likely. And I believe that, home ownership, sadly, very soon will be a thing of the past for most people. And it doesn't matter if you believe that this will be good for the environment or not. This is about controlling you. This is about owning you. And, there is actually something that we can do, and I want to say there is something that we must do. It's not that we can do something about this. We must. It's an obligation. We must be disobedient now. We can't accept this. And this taking away houses From people because they can't afford the so called upgrading of the house to a certain standard with additional insulation and solar panels on I don't know what. That's not really an upgrade, is it? It's about making it impossible for people to keep their house. This is a wealth transfer. That's what we're looking at now. And we can't accept that. Ownership is important. It's a very, very essential concept. And, some people will disagree when I say this, but if you take ownership away, what you're left with is fear to listen. Someone's going to own the stuff that you need and they will be the the so called elites. So, we must be disobedient now. We must put our foot down and refuse to accept this. And there will be consequences. There will be a price that you must pay, that I will pay, that we must all pay. But if we all refuse to accept this and whatever comes next. It will eventually stop because
(The Real) Wide Awake Media My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word! t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 10:48 AM

@ElanderNews - Elander & the News

NET ZERO - “You can’t be an environmentalist and support Wind and Solar power.” If the solution is worse than the problem then it is your duty to question the ‘science’ https://t.co/W7YWmIjOKG

Video Transcript AI Summary
To make a wind turbine, you need a large amount of iron ore, concrete, and steel. The concrete production emits carbon dioxide, and the steel requires rare earth elements, which are often sourced from China and come with environmental concerns. Additionally, the cobalt used in wind turbines is often mined by child slaves in dangerous conditions in the Congo. The turbine blades are made from balsa wood obtained by clearing parts of the Amazon forest, and they contain a toxic chemical called Bisphenol A. These blades cannot be recycled and end up as landfill, polluting the soil and water. Supporting wind and solar power means supporting pollution, slavery, and environmental damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To start with a wind turbine, you need about 30,000 tons of iron ore, about 30,000 tons of concrete. To make concrete, you need to get limestone and shale, cook it up. Limestone's got 44% carbon dioxide in it. That carbon dioxide goes in the atmosphere, you sinter it, then you grind it up, and you have cement. You then got to quarry stone to make the aggregate, to make your concrete. You then got to transport that 30,000 tonnes just for the foundation for 1 turbine. So you use a lot of concrete to make a wind turbine. You use a lot of steel to make a wind turbine. But then you get into the generator. Now the generator uses rare earth element magnets. We used to have magnets made out of iron. We then found it would be better to have an iron cobalt magnet. We now find that magnets made out of rare earth elements are much better. Rare earth elements mainly come from are part of China, Bayer and Orbul, and that rare earth element, ore, is quite rich in uranium and thorium. I've been to Byron Allborn, it is probably the greatest environmental disaster in the world. The uranium and thorium material are just thrown everywhere. So if you're using wind powered electricity, you are actually responsible for a huge amount of pollution by uranium and thorium in China, but they're Chinese, let's not worry about that. You can't be an environmentalist. Now, that's in the magnets. We also have cobalt in those wind turbines. And that cobalt, most of it is mined by slaves who are children, who are working in dangerous open pits and underground in the Congo for Chinese groups. So If you want to support wind power, you're supportive slavery, the same as if you're supporting solar power, the solar panels are made by Uyghur slaves in China. So if you want to be supporting renewables, you're supporting slavery, you're supporting massive pollution of uranium and storing. And then you look at the turbine blades, and they're made out of balsa wood laminated with epoxy. That balsa wood you get from clear filling parts of the Amazon forest to get your bolster wood. So of course, you're a good environmentalist, you want to have renewable power, bugger the Amazon, you just clear fella and get the balsa wood. And then in the epoxy, there's a chemical called Bisphenol A that's incredibly toxic. Most countries in the world have banned the use of it. This comes out of China in the laminate turbine blades. Those blades cannot be recycled. Those blades are eroding all the time and spreading this bisphenol everywhere in soils and waterways around the turbine blades. And then when the turbine blade has finished its useful life, which is much shorter than we're told, they get cut up and used as landfill. And so the best fennel A gets into soil and gets into water. You cannot possibly be an environment and support wind and solar power.
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 9:32 PM

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

The globalists want to get rid of our farmers, cattle and windmills, and replace it with their synthetic meat, bugs, solar panels and dystopian wind turbines. Don’t let them. The green agenda is a scam and the climate ‘crisis’ doesn’t exist. It’s all about money and control. https://t.co/UlYKksbyZu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the opposition to farming practices in the Netherlands, which are blamed for climate change. They argue that it doesn't make sense to blame agriculture when it has been a successful industry for centuries. The speaker questions the proposed alternatives, such as wind turbines, solar panels, and synthetic foods, which they view as a manufactured and unnatural solution. They believe that these alternatives are not as beneficial for the environment as the cows grazing in the fields. The speaker concludes by stating that deep down, everyone knows that the opposition's claims are false.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So with the farmers, it became so apparent to me, you know, just looking out at the Dutch landscape, seeing the cows graze with our windmills and our waters Yes. And that's what they oppose. That's what they say causes climate change. And then you see there this, Like, that's still the world. Speaker 1: That's that's like Yeah. Being fully in life, embracing the resources of nature To harness them for your flourishing. Right? Speaker 0: We've done it for 100 of years. Speaker 1: And no wonder that Netherlands is the 2nd largest Speaker 0: Exporter poor agricultural products in the world. Exactly. And and that that is now suddenly the cause for a new problem like climate change. It doesn't make any sense. And then, what do these people propose as the alternative? You know, they say that the farming and the cows and all of that, that's the problem. And then they their world is filled with these wind turbines, and, solar panels, and fake meats, and synthetic stuff. And you're like, okay. So that Dystopian gray, like, manufactured world of yours, that is so that is more green. That is more, Like, that's closer to nature, to who we are and that's better for the world than those those poor cows standing there in the grass? Like, Nobody like with your own eyes, you know, if you look at that you know that that's a lie. Everybody knows deep down that's a lie.
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 3:00 AM

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

Your money and your freedom are being stolen in the name of fighting CO2-caused “climate change”. This is the biggest fraud in human history. Trillions of dollars are being consumed as Big Government solutions are imposed. “Climate the Movie” is worth the 1.5 hours to learn. 👇 https://t.co/UTRQB0x3l5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists have found a link between temperature and CO2, but it's the opposite of what many believe. In the past, temperature has risen first, followed by a rise in CO2 levels. Ice ages start when CO2 is at its maximum and end when it's at its minimum, contradicting the idea that CO2 controls temperature. Looking back over millions of years, CO2 levels have changed drastically, but they have never driven temperature changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Scientists have indeed found a link between temperature and CO 2. The trouble is it's the wrong way around. Speaker 1: So it's true over the last few 1000000 years of the ice age that we're in now that CO 2 and temperature are correlated. But if CO 2 is the driver, it has to change first, and the temperature has to change second. Speaker 2: And, in fact, when you start to look at the data very specifically, you see the exact reverse. Temperature starts to rise first. And then on the order of a century to a few centuries later, we start to see a rise in CO2. It's long been known that, the temperature actually moves first. So temperature goes up, CO2 goes up after that. Temperature goes down, CO2 goes down. Speaker 3: Ice ages start when carbon dioxide is at its maximum, and ice ages and when carbon dioxide is at its minimum, which is the exact opposite of what would occur if carbon dioxide was controlling the temperature. Speaker 4: The question of whether CO 2 drives the climate is easily resolved. You can look back in time over 100 of 1000000 of years, CO2 levels have changed radically many times. Did this cause temperature change? No, absolutely not. CO2 has never driven temperature changes in the past. Never.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Climate the Movie: The Cold Truth The final nail in the coffin for the "human-induced climate change" scam. An absolute MUST-WATCH! Directed by Martin Durkin (@Martin_Durkin), director of 2007's 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'. Produced by Tom Nelson (@TomANelson). Please share far and wide!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video claims that the climate change narrative is driven by financial interests rather than scientific evidence. It suggests that the climate industry, fueled by government funding and green subsidies, has created a consensus on climate change to secure more funds. The video argues that historical climate data does not support the idea that CO2 drives temperature change and that natural factors such as solar activity and cosmic rays have a greater impact. It also questions the validity of extreme weather events being attributed to climate change. The video discusses the influence and impact of the climate crisis industry, highlighting how it relies on the existence of a climate crisis to sustain itself. It explores the suppression of dissenting voices and the censorship of skeptical views within the scientific community, academia, and media. The video argues that the climate alarm is not only an attack on science but also a means to shape society and promote anti-capitalist ideologies. It concludes by highlighting the negative consequences of the climate alarm on developing countries and the growing skepticism among the general public. Overall, the video suggests that the focus on climate change is driven by financial incentives and raises concerns about the impact of the climate crisis industry on scientific discourse and societal development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you? Speaker 1: This is the story of how an eccentric environmental scare grew into a powerful global industry. Speaker 2: It's a wonderful business opportunity. Okay? You want climate, we'll give you climate. Speaker 3: There's a huge amount of money involved. This is a huge big money scam. Speaker 4: There are not just now 1,000,000,000, but there are 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars at stake. Speaker 1: It's a story of self interest and big government funding. Speaker 5: People like me, our careers depend on funding of climate research. This is what I've been doing just about my whole career. This is what the other climate researchers are doing with their whole career. They don't want this to end. Speaker 6: If CO 2 isn't having the huge negative impacts that we claimed it was having originally, how are we going to stay in business? Speaker 3: A lot of people's livelihoods depend on it. They're not gonna give that. Speaker 1: This is a story of the corruption of science. Speaker 7: There's no such thing as a climate emergency happening on this planet now. It's there's no no evidence of 1. Speaker 8: The climate alarm is nonsense. You know? It's it's a hoax. I've never liked hoax. I I think scam is a better word, but I'm willing to live with folks. Speaker 1: It's a story about the bullying and intimidation of anyone who dares to challenge the climate alarm. Speaker 6: To speak up against or about climate change in any sort of skeptical way was essentially career suicide. Speaker 9: Activists are even calling for any skepticism to be criminalized. Speaker 1: It's the story of an assault on individual freedom. Speaker 8: It's a wonderful way to increase government power. If there's an existential threat out there worldwide, well, you need a powerful worldwide government, you know, to cope with it. Speaker 9: We see all these kind of, authoritarian measures being adopted in the name of saving the planet. Speaker 8: You've suddenly got the population under control all over the world. Speaker 1: We called it industrial progress. Since the industrial revolution, the development of free market capitalist mass production has made ever more goods ever more affordable to ever larger numbers of people. Mass production marched hand in hand with mass consumption. In the modern age, ordinary people enjoy a level of prosperity never before achieved in human history. But all the while, we are told, we were destroying the planet. Computers have calculated what is in store for us as we produce and consume evermore. The weather will get worse. The planet will boil. We, greedy humans, must accept limits on our lifestyle, consume less, travel less. Those who deny the climate crisis are not just wrong. They're dangerous, spreading the poison of doubt among a gullible population. These deniers should be shunned and shamed and censored, for these climate deniers are flat earthers. They are anti science. Teaching at New York University is one of these climate deniers. Professor Steven Coonan is one of America's leading physicists. He was a science adviser to president Obama and both vice president and provost of Caltech, one of the prestigious scientific institutes in the world. Speaker 2: I teach climate science to my students at NYU, and I always tell them check the data or the papers yourself. And they all come out of that course with their eyes wide open. Speaker 1: Professor Koonin's best selling book, unsettled, argues that mainstream scientific studies, accepted by official agencies, do not support the notion that there is any kind of climate crisis at all. Speaker 2: Of course, I've been called a denier. And my response is tell me what I'm denying because I'm quoting from you directly from the official UN Scientific Reports. Speaker 1: Dick Lindzen also dismisses the claims of climate alarmists. He's one of the world's leading meteorologists, who's professor of meteorology at both Harvard University and MIT, and has served on the UN's intergovernmental panel on climate change or IPCC. Speaker 10: Even the intergovernmental panel on climate change, if you go to their section of working 1 group 1, which is the science, they don't support any of these claims. And I assure you having served on it, it's biased, but you couldn't get any real scientist to agree some of the nonsense that's being promoted. Speaker 1: Will Hapa is also a denier and is another of America's leading physicists. He has been science adviser to 3 presidents and professor of physics at both Columbia and Princeton University. Speaker 8: There's this mischievous, idea that's promoted that scientific truth is determined by consensus. In real science, you know, there are always arguments no science has ever settled, you know. It just is absurd when people say the science of climate is settled. It's not there's no such thing as settled science, especially climate. Speaker 1: Doctor John Clauser is one of the most respected scientists in the world. In 2022, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics. Speaker 4: The science that's being done is appallingly bad, in my opinion. There are a large number of scientists who are in violent disagreement. They refer to themselves as skeptics. Since I am no longer worried about losing funding or a job, whatever, I call myself a climate change denier. Speaker 1: These very eminent and respected scientists and others like them are not flat earthers. They do not deny science. So what's the evidence that has caused them to dismiss the climate alarm as nonsense? We are told that current temperatures are unprecedented and dangerously high. It's possible to check if this is true because we have evidence of Earth's climate history dating back 100, 1000, even 1000000 of years. The desert of Judea by the Dead Sea. Professor Nir Shaviv from the Raqqa Institute of Physics has come here looking for clues. 1000 of years ago, this place was underwater. And etched into the rocks are lines which, if you know how to read them, tell the story of Earth's climate history. Speaker 11: And here's the climate. We're at the, lake bed of, what used to be Lake Lisan. It's a lake that existed until, the end of the last ice age. Back then, the lake level was maybe a 100 meters above where we were located. When we want to reconstruct climates of the past, we have to, look for evidence, for clues. And when the, lake existed, it had the deposits. And by looking at these, layers here, we can actually reconstruct how the climate has changed. Speaker 1: Warmer water means more life. The accumulation of more shells and bones from sea creatures, and other changes that are reflected in the ancient layers of the lakebed. The lines act as a kind of thermometer, and this is just one way geologists can reconstruct past climate. Speaker 11: In other places, we can go to, stalagmite caves and see the annual rings that you have in the stalagmite. Or we can drill, cores from the, bottom of the the ocean, and then, look at layers there, or many other places. But here, I think this is one of the nicest places because you can actually see you can actually see how, the climate has, changed. Speaker 1: So when we look back in time, what do we find? For 200000000 years, dinosaurs roamed the Earth, an Earth marked by fertile dense forests teeming with light. And at no time during those 200000000 years were temperatures as cold as they are today. Speaker 2: If you go back, let's say, 200000000 years, it was maybe 13 degrees warmer than it is now. So on the geological perspective, this is not at all unprecedented. Speaker 12: For the Speaker 1: last 500000000 years, temperatures have varied greatly. But for almost all that time, the Earth was much, much warmer than today. Compared to the last half 1000000000 years, the Earth right now is exceptionally cold. In fact, there are very few times when it's been this cold. Speaker 2: We're relatively cold. Maybe not quite the coldest it's been in 500,000,000 years, but pretty close to it. Speaker 6: We are in a remarkably cool period if we look over the last 550,000,000 years. In fact, only one other time period in that last five 50000000 years was the temperature as cool as it is now. Speaker 1: The mammals who now inhabit the earth began to evolve around 60000000 years ago when the world was much warmer than today. Speaker 6: We just look at the last 65000000 years. So this is after the dinosaurs go extinct. Mammals really start to take over and our evolutionary ancestors start to live on the land. Any time period within the last 65000000 years was warmer than it is essentially today. Speaker 1: The Earth's mammals, humans included, appear to thrive when it's warm, warmer than it is now. Speaker 7: There is no doubt that warm is better than cold in geological history. We are a tropical species. A human being in the shade naked dies at 20 C from hypothermia. We evolved on the equator in Africa, and the only reason we were able to get out of there eventually was fire, shelter, and clothing. Speaker 1: Over the last 50000000 years, temperatures steadily declined, plunging the Earth into what geologists call the late Cenozoic ice age. We are still in that ice age. Speaker 7: The reason there's all that ice on the poles is because we're in an ice age. Everybody knows that. Who knows anything about the history of the Earth? This is an ice age. We're at the tail end of a 50,000,000 year cooling period, and they're saying it's too hot. Speaker 13: If we zoom in Speaker 1: on the past few 1000000 years, we see temperatures sinking, and as they do, fluctuating between extremely cold periods and slightly milder periods. The extremely cold periods are called glacial maxima, when the planet is mostly covered in ice, and the slightly less cold are called glacial minima, when there's just ice at the poles. For the past 10000 years, fortunately, we've been in a slightly less cold glacial minimum known as the Holocene. With milder weather, humans began to emerge from their caves. And several 1000 years ago, we see the rise of the first great civilizations in a blissful period, which, according to many studies, was considerably warmer than today. This is known as the Holocene Climate Optimum. Speaker 2: It was called an optimum because people thought that warmer was better. Speaker 1: Since then, temperatures have declined and begun to fluctuate. In Roman times, there was a blissfully warm period, followed by a brutal cold period in the dark ages. Speaker 13: Then came Speaker 1: the Barmen medieval warm period, according to many studies, as warm or warmer than today, followed by especially cold period known as the Little Ice Age, possibly the coldest in the last 10000 years. And here it is, the Roman warm period, the cold dark age, the medieval warm period, and then the very cold little ice age, from which, for the past 300 years or so, we've been recovering. The longest instrumental record of temperature in the world comes from Central England, and this is what it shows. Since the worst of the little ice age from 16 50, the temperature has risen gently by little more than 1 degree Celsius. Speaker 8: The Central England record of temperature is a is a world treasure. You know, it's the longest continuous record that we have, and it's certainly not a very alarming record. It began in the depths of the little ice age, and so you can see the slight warming that followed the little ice age. And there's certainly nothing very alarming that's happening today, at the very end of the record. Most of the warming that we're observing today is the recovery from the little ice age, whatever caused that. Speaker 10: Well, you know, we're talking over the entire industrial period of about 1 degree centigrade. Speaker 1: To put this one degree in perspective, let's look at New York Central Park. Records show that there has been no overall change in temperature here since 1940. But from 1 year to the next, the average temperature can vary by 3 degrees Celsius without many New Yorkers even noticing. In fact, between the warmest year in the 19 sixties and the coolest in 2000, there's a difference of 5 degrees Celsius. Speaker 2: The average temperature on this day, in this year, might be 5 degrees different from the average temperature a year ago or 2 years. Speaker 8: You know, when I hear people pontificating about 1 and a half degrees leading to the end of civilization, I think, what have they been smoking? You know? Are you crazy? Right? So Speaker 1: According to thermometer readings since 18/80, there's been a very mild increase in temperature. Only by stretching the y axis on this graph is the increase noticeable. This is the rising line used by official agencies as proof of global warming. But is it accurate? Professor Ross McKittrick is an expert in statistical analysis at Guelph University. He noticed something odd about modern thermometer records. Thermometers, even in the same region, give out very different readings depending on where they're located. Speaker 12: I was interested in the question of how do you explain the spatial pattern of warming? So some places warm a lot, some places don't warm much. And it turns out it's highly correlated with the spatial pattern of economic activity. Speaker 1: Where there are more people and there is more human activity, there's more heat. This is known as the urban heat island effect. Speaker 13: Urban heat island effect is essentially London. Right? You pick London. With buildings, with a lot of activities, tends to be a a few degree. I mean, we're talking now Celsius. Right? Even 4 or 5 degrees Celsius, warm and then our skirt. This is a phenomenon of urbanization. These days, the obvious effect is actually concrete retaining retaining heat. Speaker 1: This can be illustrated with a satellite heat map of Paris. The center of Paris can be as much as 5 degrees Celsius warmer than the surrounding countryside. Speaker 13: Paris, London, Beijing, Shanghai, you name it. New Delhi, all of them absolutely demonstrated the effects. Speaker 1: So how has this affected the official temperature record? In the early part of the 20th century, it was normal to erect weather thermometers just outside towns, close enough to check every day, but away from the heat of urban life. But over the 20th century, those towns have expanded. Suburbs have spread. There are more roads, more cars. Thermometers, which were once outside towns, are now surrounded by shopping malls, offices, factories, and houses. Speaker 5: These towns and all the locations where thermometers are located, on average, they've all grown in population, let's say, since 18/80. You've got buildings, growing up around the thermometers. You've got parking lots. So you've got all of these non climate influences, which are affecting the temperatures, which raises questions about the quality of thermometer data for monitoring global warming. Speaker 1: To correct for this corruption of the data, an obvious solution is to use only records from rural weather stations, which have been less affected by urban development. This has now been done by a team led by doctor Willie Soon. Speaker 13: We combine all the best rural station. Any anything that we can correct for, we correct for. And we show, if you just don't use this data set and use only rural, you you get a very different kind of picture. Speaker 1: According to rural temperature records, temperatures rose from the 18 eighties but peaked in the 19 forties. Then there was a marked cooling until the 19 seventies. After that, temperatures recover, but are still today barely higher than they were in the 19 forties. Speaker 13: What we see is that, basically, you have a warming from the 1900, 18, you know, fifties or so to 19 thirties and forties and started to warm and then cool in a substantial way to the seventies, about 76 or so. Instead of a long term systematic warming trend, it has a variability. Multi decade or like every 50, 60 years or so kind of a variation. Speaker 1: It's not just rural thermometers that show little warming. Merchant ships and other naval vessels have been measuring the temperature of the sea since 19th century. In red, we see the land temperature record since the 18 sixties, which has been inflated by urban thermometers. But in blue is the ocean temperature record. From around 1900, the 2 begin to diverge. Ocean records show far less warming in the 20th century, and the pattern more closely resembles the rural temperature record. Speaker 13: Sea is not supposed to be, quote, unquote, contaminated by urban heat island effect. Am I right? Yes. So when we compare the two record, within the range of uncertainty, this behavior actually fits. Speaker 1: Scientists have also studied temperature change by looking at tree rings, which again shows very little warming. There's a gentle rise till the mid 20th century, a cooling to the 19 seventies, followed by a mild recovery. Once again, it shows temperatures today are barely different to those of the 19 thirties and forties, and the pattern closely resembles rural temperatures. Satellites too seem to be telling a different story. Our ability to measure global temperature accurately took a leap forward when satellites began to orbit the Earth. One of the scientists who pioneered the use of satellites to measure temperature is doctor Roy Spencer, who in the 19 eighties was senior scientist for climate at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. Speaker 5: We were discussing over lunch, isn't there some way we can use satellites to monitor global temperatures? Because as you know, the temperature network of thermometers is pretty skimpy around the world. So it's kinda hard to get a global temperature. Speaker 1: Doctor Spencer's development of weather satellites was revolutionary. He and his colleague, professor John Christie, have been awarded NASA's medal for exceptional scientific achievement. Speaker 5: Our satellite data begins in January of 1979. That's when we have complete global coverage, and we have it right up to the present. Speaker 1: There was one critical question about temperature that satellites were singularly well equipped to answer. Speaker 5: Has there been a spurious warming that has crept into the global temperature record over land, that's just a result of an increase in population. And that's something that we've been analyzing and working a lot on lately and we're finding that, especially in urban areas, it's large. I mean, since 18/80, most of the warming, it looks like, is due to the urban heat island effect. Speaker 8: We're lucky to have a few independent scientists like John Christie and Roy Spencer with their satellite measurements of temperature. Before they started releasing this, ground based temperature records were going wild. They were going up you know, like crazy with no no bounds. But now they have to contend with the fact that there's this independent and probably better way of measuring the whole globe's temperature, which is not alarming at all. Speaker 1: Evidence from multiple sources now agree that the official global temperature record, as used by world governments and reported in the world's media, is showing far too much warming over the last 120 years, artificially inflated by urbanization. Speaker 12: You look at the weather record, the satellite record, the rural record, the ocean record doesn't warm nearly as much as land. All of these indications show that the, like, the big warming pulse in the record is the northern hemisphere land record, and that's also where most of this data contamination is happening. Speaker 1: But if the mild warming that has taken place in the last 3 to 400 years, can any of it be attributed to human emissions of CO 2? Professor Henrik Svensmark is visiting the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and taking a stroll in the evolution garden, dedicated to preserving the oldest surviving plant geological past. Speaker 14: What we have here is a a ginkgo tree, and it's actually a living, fossil in the sense that this type of tree, first appeared about 270,000,000 years ago. On the underside of the leaf, there are what we call stomata, the cells where they can uptake c02. So they're actually measuring how much c02 is in the air, and then they adjust the number of the stomata to how much c02 there is. And by looking at fossils and measuring how many there are at a different time, it says something about what was the level of c02 back in time. Speaker 1: So when we look back in time, what do we find? Over almost all of the last 500000000 years, the level of CO 2 in the atmosphere has been far, far higher than it is now. Even with modern industry's contribution to c o two levels, by geological standards, the level of atmospheric c o two today is close to being as low as it has ever been. Speaker 14: At present, we have about 400 parts per million. 50,000,000 years ago, it might have been 2,000 parts per million. So a much, much higher concentration of CO2. Speaker 6: I think current estimates of global CO2 is 423 or so parts per million today. If we look through the Phanerozoic the last 550,000,000 years we would see a CO 2 on the order of 7,000 parts per million. Speaker 1: CO 2 is plant food and the result of much higher levels of atmospheric CO 2 in the past was a much much greener world. Speaker 6: Periods of elevated CO 2 tend to be time periods of of of a huge biodiversity on on the planet. In fact, we're in a c o two famine if we look over the last 550,000,000 years. Speaker 1: At the depths of the most recent glacial maximum, the amount of CO 2 in the atmosphere sank so low, all life on earth came close to extinction. Speaker 15: They say CO 2 is higher than it's been for a 100000 years, but what they don't tell you in that period they're talking about is that c02 sank so low that all life on earth nearly died. Speaker 7: 20000 years ago, c02 is at the lowest level it has ever been in the history of the Earth, a 180 parts per million. If it had gone down another 30 parts per million, we'd all be dead. Speaker 6: There is a low point of c o two where photosynthesis becomes so inefficient that plant life would die, then everything else starts to perish after that. Speaker 8: During the last, glacial maximum, there's good evidence that in many parts of the world, there was plant starvation from not enough CO 2. So, we should be very grateful that CO 2 levels are beginning to go back up. We're still far from the historical norms, which would be several 1,000 parts per million. There's not enough fossil fuel to get there, but at least we're making a start. Speaker 1: But has the small recent increase in CO 2 affected the temperature? We would now show you a picture of CO 2, but we can't because it's invisible. C o 2 makes up a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere, just 0.04 of a percent. It is just one of 25 different greenhouse gases, which, taken as a whole, form only one part of Earth's complex climate system. So what evidence is there that this trace gas is having any noticeable impact on the climate? If it were true that higher levels of c o two caused higher temperatures, we should be able to see that in Earth's climate history. Here, scientists are drilling into ancient ice cores. These cores tell us both about past temperatures and c02 levels. Scientists have indeed found a link between temperature and c02. The trouble is it's the wrong way around. Speaker 8: Though it's true over the last few 1000000 years of the ice age that we're in now that CO 2 and temperature are correlated. But if CO 2 is the driver, it has to change first, and the temperature has to change second. Speaker 6: In fact, when you start to look at the data very specifically, you see the exact reverse. Temperature starts to rise first. And then on the order of a century to a few centuries later, we start to see a rise in CO2. Speaker 12: It's long been known that, the temperature actually moves first. So temperature goes up, CO2 goes up after that. Temperature goes down, CO2 goes down. Speaker 3: Ice ages start when carbon dioxide is at its maximum and ice ages and when carbon dioxide is at its minimum, which is the exact opposite of what would occur if carbon dioxide was controlling the temperature. Speaker 15: The question of whether CO2 drives the climate is easily resolved. You can look back in time over 100 of 1000000 of years. CO2 levels have changed radically many times. Did this cause temperature change? No. Absolutely not. CO 2 has never driven temperature changes in the past. Never. Speaker 1: Nor is it clear in recent times that c o two is having any effect on temperature. Here, we see industrial output of c o two since 17 50. From the mid 19th century to the mid 20th century, there was only a slight increase. It's not until the 19 forties that industrial production of c o two begins to take off. But this doesn't match the temperature record. According to rural thermometers, most of the warming in the past 200 years occurred before the 19 forties and have barely changed since then. Speaker 2: One of the embarrassments that IPCC doesn't like to talk about was that the 19 thirties, when human influences were much smaller, were particularly warm. Speaker 13: That's the puzzle that the first early part where we have such a sharp, warming from the 1900 to 19 thirties and 1940s, c o two could never cause the temperature rise. Speaker 1: But the 19 thirties and early forties were so hot is puzzling. More puzzling still is what happened next. Speaker 8: By the end of World War 2, CO 2 was really going up, and yet the temperature was going down. Speaker 13: From 40 to 70, while the CO 2 continued to rise, these things started to cool. What happened? Speaker 7: Journalists were writing about the coming ice age. It was on the cover of Time Magazine. Speaker 3: 19 seventies, the new ice age was the big story. Speaker 1: And how about since the 19 seventies? According to computer climate models, over the past half century, rising c 02 should have led to this increase in temperature. But according to multiple satellite and balloon measurements, what actually happened was this. Speaker 5: Well, what we found from the satellite data is that the global atmosphere is not warming up as fast as the climate models say it should be. There's a couple dozen climate models now that have been worked on for decades. You know, 1,000,000,000 of dollars, tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars have been invested in these climate modeling efforts, and we find that generally speaking, virtually all of the climate models produce too much warming over this period since 1979 up to the present. Now, even if we say the surface thermometers are correct, they still don't produce as much warming as most of the climate models say there should have been, let's say, in the last 50 years. Speaker 2: The models individually and even collectively when you average over all of them in so called ensembles, they don't get it right. Speaker 8: You can already see that the main, support of the climate alarm movement, which are these enormous computer models, they're clearly wrong. They don't agree with what we observe. They're all running much too hot. They don't get the geographical distribution of temperatures anywhere close. They don't get El Nino, La Nina cycles. They're they're just nonsense. Speaker 1: All climate models are based on the assumption that c o two drives temperature change, but actual observations and historical evidence clearly suggest that it doesn't. Speaker 4: Yes. I assert that there is no connection whatsoever between c 02 and climate change. That's all across a crap in my opinion. Speaker 7: There is no truth to the idea that the earth is warmer now than it has been in the past. It's a lie. There is no truth that c o two is higher than it should be. That is a lie. Speaker 1: Earth's climate has changed many times over the course of its long history and will continue to change without any help from us. Speaker 8: Climate always changes. You know? Who denies climate change? It's always changing. Speaker 1: But if c o two doesn't drive climate change, what does? In Earth's atmosphere, there are powerful forces at work, and perhaps the most powerful of all are clouds. Speaker 4: C02 is quite unimportant in controlling the earth's climate. What is important is clouds. Clouds don't absorb any energy at all. They simply reflect all of the sunlight back out into space, big bright white clouds. If you look at the earth you see lots and lots of them and they vary dramatically from one day to the next. That is 100 of times more powerful than the trivial effects of c02. Speaker 1: But what controls the number and density of clouds on Earth? Professor Henrik Svensmark from the Danish National Space Institute is in Jerusalem with the astrophysicist Nir Shaviv. Together, they've been exploring cloud variation and its effect on climate. And strangely, they found a link between clouds and exploding supernovae far off in our galaxy. Speaker 14: When we have big stars, they don't live very long, relatively only maybe a few 1000000 years up to 40000000 years, but they end their life in a huge explosion, which we call the supernova. Speaker 1: An exploding supernova sends out vast quantities of debris, tiny charged subatomic particles known as cosmic rays, traveling almost at the speed of light. And as they hit Earth, they develop into seeds which attract water vapor and form clouds. Professor Shevive noticed that the amount of cloud cover on Earth is related to our journey round the Milky Way. As our solar system orbits the galaxy over 1000000 of years, it passes through the galaxy's spiral arms, dense clusters of stars. As it does, we are exposed to more or less cloud forming cosmic rays, and this corresponds to historic temperature changes on Earth. Speaker 11: The really mind boggling thing is that using geology, you can reconstruct the climate on Earth over the past 1000000000 years, and you can reconstruct our galactic journey, and both tell the same story. Speaker 1: But what about temperature change on shorter time scales? The sun, our source of heat and light, a seething mass of gigantic magnetic storms, which vary in strength and number over time and which affect Earth directly and indirectly. When it is very active, the sun sends giant gusts of solar wind through the solar system. The solar wind warms us indirectly by acting as a barrier, limiting the number of cloud forming cosmic rays reaching Earth. Speaker 14: So from the sun, we have the solar wind. It carries the sun's magnetic field, out to a large distance, and it works like a shield against cosmic rays. When the Speaker 11: sun is more active, you have a stronger solar wind. You have less cosmic rays reaching the inner solar system and reaching the atmosphere. And the clouds, which are then formed, are less white. They reflect less of the sunlight, which means that it's going to be warmer here on Earth. Speaker 1: Here is a proxy reconstruction of ocean temperatures over 1000 of years. And here is one of solar activity over the same period. What is causing the ocean temperature to change is clearly variations in solar activity. Speaker 13: Because IPCC is determined to go on a narrative that only c o two can drive the climate system, they turn off the sun essentially. Right? Because the sun is just a background thing for them. That it doesn't do anything. Speaker 1: Astrophysicist Willie Soon decided to look again at the rural temperature record for the past 150 years. Then he looked at a record of changes in solar activity over the same period. To doctor Sun, it was obvious that it was the sun, not c02, that was driving temperature. Speaker 13: As of 2023, IPCC says is that the sun have absolutely zero chance in to explain the changes of the climate system on broad scale, let's say global warming on Northern Hemisphere. We say no. We can easily deperate the sun. Can I explain all of it? There's 0 for the c o two, 100% for the sun. How's that? Speaker 1: Why are these and other studies never reported in the mainstream media? And if climate change is natural, what are we to make of the alleged terrifying increase in extreme weather events, of the heat waves and hurricanes, of forest fires, droughts, and the rest. Speaker 2: My first instinct as a scientist and what I teach my students is, well, let's look at the data. And when you do that, you discover, as you can read in the IPCC reports themselves, that it's pretty hard to find trends in extreme events, much less attribute them to human influences. Speaker 12: You've now had decades of putting the idea in people's heads that anytime the weather is bad, it's climate change and greenhouse gases. So I think people at this point can't help themselves. If you have a heat wave, immediately, everybody's thinking, oh, what have we done to the weather? Speaker 2: If somebody says in the news this is the warmest day since 1980 or something, well, you can look up the temperature records and see for yourself whether it was in fact warmer in the 19 thirties as it often is. Speaker 1: US temperature records are the best in the world, and here is the official US government record of heat waves in the US over the past century. It shows very clearly that the 19 thirties were far more prone to heat waves than we are today. Not only were there more heat waves in the 19 thirties, the heat waves then were much hotter than those of today. Likewise, official figures show that the number of hot days in the US has markedly declined. Speaker 3: United States was much hotter in the 1930. North Dakota reached a 121 degrees. South Dakota was a 120 degrees. Wisconsin was a 114 degrees. These sort of temperatures are just completely out of range of anything people experience now. Speaker 1: A common mistake is to suppose that higher average temperature will mean more hot weather, but this isn't true. Here again is the Central England temperature record, the longest instrumental temperature record in the world. Summer temperatures over the past 3 to 400 years since the end of the little ice age have barely changed at all. It is winter temperatures that have been slightly rising. The earth's climate has not been getting hotter. It's been getting milder. Speaker 8: That's certainly being observed all over the world. If you look at temperature records, high temperatures are almost unchanged. But cold temperatures at night or during the winter are are going up a little bit. Not very much, but you can measure it. Speaker 2: When the average goes up, it's really more due to the coldest temperatures getting warmer. So the temperature's getting milder rather than getting hotter. Speaker 1: What about the increasing number of wildfires we're often told about? Speaker 2: If you look at the actual number of forest fires from satellite observations, the actual number's going down. Speaker 1: Here is an estimate of global wildfires since 1900. It shows a clear decline. And here is a record of areas affected by wildfires in the US. It shows that wildfires were far, far worse in the 19 thirties. Speaker 13: From 19 thirties and 19 twenties when you have data, it was huge. Five to 10 times bigger than the current level. Speaker 1: How about hurricanes? The US has by far the best record of hurricane activity in the world. Over the past 120 years, there is no overall change. In fact, the trend is slightly down. Speaker 2: When you look at the data for hurricanes, technically tropical cyclones, you see that there is no long term trend. Speaker 1: How about the rest of the world? Here is a chart of global hurricane activity over the past 40 years. Speaker 8: The hurricanes have been around forever. You know? We've got good proxy records of hurricanes, and, there's been no change in their frequency. Even the IPCC admits that. Speaker 1: How about melting ice caps and drought? Here's a satellite record of temperature in Antarctica since the late 19 seventies. And here is a record of global drought since 1950. There is no And here is a record of global drought since 1950. There is no observable increase at all. Polar bears are meant to be going extinct, but studies suggest their numbers are growing. The Great Barrier Reef too has recently reached record levels. Speaker 7: There's no such thing as a climate emergency happening on this planet now. It's there's no no evidence of 1. Speaker 3: Yeah. The extreme weather event story is is just absurd. There there's no basis to it at all. It's just based on propaganda. The actual data shows the opposite. Speaker 2: I've shown you the official data, the official science. Tell me what I'm denying. Speaker 8: The climate alarm is nonsense. You know, it's it's a hoax. As as a I I don't I've never liked hoax. I I think scam is a better word, but I'm willing to live with hoax. Speaker 1: But why are we told again and again that man made climate chaos is an undisputed scientific fact beyond question, beyond doubt. To answer this, we must examine the so called consensus on climate change. Speaker 4: Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Until the 19 eighties, global warming was little more than an eccentric scare story put about by radical environmentalists. But then the cause was picked up by an ambitious young senator, Al Gore, who would soon become vice president. A $1,000,000,000 a year of public money was made available for research into climate change. This quickly rose to 2,000,000,000. Speaker 4: Up to that level. Speaker 1: Academic researchers in various disciplines began to apply for this climate funding. Speaker 2: If you want to qualify for money that's labeled climate, well, you take whatever you're doing and you add a little bit, of climate speak to it and away you go. Speaker 10: You're dealing with the sexual habits of cockroaches. You'll add and the impact of climate. Speaker 12: So all I have to do is add a little wrinkle to my grant application to explain how, well, I'm worried that climate change will mean the death of all the maple trees. And so right away, you qualify for funding. Speaker 1: Academics of every kind lined up for climate funding. Climate became an exciting new area of interest for sociologists, biologists, professors of English literature, lecturers in gender studies, and many more. Speaker 10: And it also served to create a community. I mean, you know, you've become a climate scientist now even though you know nothing about the physics of climate. Speaker 1: Thousands of papers were published on climate change and prostitution, climate change and beer, climate change and the black death, climate change and disability, climate change and video games, and everything else imaginable. Speaker 12: There's an almost comical list of studies out there. Just do a Google search on climate change and and and everything comes up. Speaker 1: Few of these papers ever questioned whether climate change was actually true. Speaker 2: After you've done the research and you write the paper up, sometimes you find there's no effect at all from climate, but you still have to say in your papers, oh, yes. Climate change is real, and, we just need to study this some more. Speaker 1: Since so few of these so called climate studies challenged the idea of climate change, it was declared that there was a scientific consensus. Climate change must be true. Climate also became a new focus for government funded research bodies. Speaker 4: Scientific research in the United States tends to be dominantly funded by, government grants. And so whatever government grants are offered, sort of determine much of the science being done. Speaker 1: It was during the Cold War that many government research bodies were set up. But the end of the Cold War and pressure on government spending has left many of them struggling to justify their continued funding. Speaker 5: United States Congress only funds problems. Okay? Research into problems, whether it's money that goes to NASA or NOAA or National Science Foundation or Department of Energy or any other alphabet soup, you know, organization. Speaker 8: It's always been a problem to support your research or your existence or raison d'etre. And so climate was a godsend. If Congress is willing Speaker 5: to pay you to find evidence of global warming, by golly, as a scientist, we're gonna go find evidence of it because that's what we're what we're being paid to do. And guess what? If you don't find evidence or say the evidence suggests it's not a problem, your funding ends. This totally corrupts the way we look at the science. Speaker 4: Who the famous gangster asked, why do you rob banks? And he said, well, because that's where the money is. Speaker 1: The climate alarm brought funds. And the bigger the supposed threat, the more funds seem to flow. The publicly funded science establishment now had a direct financial interest in playing up the alarm. Speaker 6: So there's a huge incentive to over exaggerate or to speak in hyperbole, even if the data doesn't support exactly what you're saying, because that's what brings the funds. I was in that boat. I was someone that was defending climate change as a grad student, quite a bit, because the truth is I didn't give it too much thought, but I, I thought well, it's getting a ton of attention. It brings a ton of money into the earth sciences. Even if I don't buy all the hyperbole, what's the problem? Speaker 1: By the late 19 nineties, what had started as an environmental scare story was gaining momentum. Western governments and their senior civil servants were more than willing to address the climate problem. Green taxes were levied, green regulation expanded, and this in turn generated more climate related jobs and activity. Speaker 12: Take the banking sector, for instance. Say to a banker, we want you to file reports with the the regulatory commission on how climate change is gonna affect your bank. Well, the banker doesn't know anything about this subject, so then they have to commission studies from academics. And, of course, the academics are happy to come and tell them, well, it's gonna be terrible for your bank. It's gonna cause all kinds of problems, and you could you need to give us money to research this. Speaker 1: Green subsidies and regulation meant there was now money to be made in climate. Renewables firms sprouted. Consultancy firms offered advice on what they called sustainability and climate compliance. Speaker 2: It's a wonderful business opportunity. Okay? You want climate, we'll give you climate. Speaker 1: The renewables industry alone now turns over a $1,000,000,000,000 a year, and that's expected to double in the next few years. Speaker 4: What used to be a cottage industry has is now blossomed to become a major part of the world economy. Speaker 1: The growth of this climate industry has seen an explosion of highly paid green jobs. Chief sustainability officers, carbon offset advisors, ESG consultants, climate compliance lawyers, and countless others. Speaker 6: Students started to come into our departments as earth science departments with a focus on climate. That never happened before. But they started to look at their career prospects, and they were smart, and they were looking at who's hiring. And the fact of the matter was is that everything in the hiring pool had climate somewhere attached to the name. Speaker 12: I started a few years ago seeing programs like, a master's degree in climate finance. And I just what on earth is is climate I don't understand what a master's degree in finance is. Well, now you need a university that's going to teach this program. You need professors of climate finance. Speaker 9: Every single school or university or business will have a climate officer or climate officers and a climate program. And you look at any of these institutions or businesses, you will find they all are signed up to it, and anyone who hasn't signed up will come under pressure. Speaker 1: At the last gathering of the publicly funded UN's IPCC, 70,000 delegates flew in from around the world. Government bureaucrats, green NGOs, carbon sequestration consultants, environmental journalists, heads of renewables companies. But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Many hundreds of thousands of jobs worldwide now depend on the climate crisis. Speaker 12: When you start building this enormous population whose job is to manage the crisis and, and also, explicitly to make sure that people are alarmed about the crisis because this whole industry depends on the existence of the crisis. Speaker 1: But therein lies the one great threat to this multi $1,000,000,000,000 industry. All the jobs, all of the funding are totally dependent on there being a climate crisis. If Speaker 6: c o two isn't having the huge negative impacts that we claimed it was having originally, how are we going to stay in business? How do we justify our existence if climate change isn't this existential threat that we claimed it was over the last 4 decades or so? Speaker 5: People like me, our careers depend on funding of climate research. This is what I've been doing just about my whole career. This is what the other climate researchers are doing with their whole career. They don't want this to end. Speaker 2: If NASA Speaker 3: said global warming is not a problem, where does their funding disappears? Right? So they can't say that. I mean, you've got the United Nations intergovernmental panel for climate change. If they said the climate isn't changing, they'd have no reason to exist. Speaker 6: The IPCC has a self preservation instinct to show that climate change is an existential threat. Otherwise, there's no reason for them to be collecting the money and doing the work in the first place. Speaker 4: There are not just now 1,000,000,000, but there are 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars at stake. Speaker 3: There's a huge amount of money involved. This is a huge big money scam. A lot of people's livelihoods depend on it. They're not Speaker 2: gonna give that up. If suddenly the notion becomes apparent that this is not such a problem, you're gonna see that as an existential threat. Speaker 1: Scientists who studied the natural causes of climate change began to be viewed with suspicion as 2 Harvard astrophysicists discovered. Speaker 13: How much does the sun change, and how does it change, and why does it change? And then we didn't even want to get into the temperature record. The climate thing immediately, they will come after because when we started to estimate that the sun changed by quite, you know, significantly in terms of climatic sense, immediately the attack is there. Because it's not following the narrative because they need the c o two to be the only one, the only dominant player. Speaker 16: When you try to say, well, see, we're just looking for the background of natural variability, which the response would be we can't have natural changes as an effect. It has to be human caused. And some of that was directly stated, but most of it was indirect. Your funding for this kind of project will be dropped. This kind of project doesn't go anywhere. Speaker 10: By that time, anything that contradicted the narrative of global warming as a serious problem was not going to get funded. Speaker 1: Editors of academic journals came under pressure not to accept papers, which were deemed to be skeptical of the climate crisis. Speaker 10: We will not publish anything that questions this. I mean, it's not something surreptitious. Speaker 1: Scientists who dared to point out in public that there was no climate chaos began to be sidelined and shunned. Speaker 12: If a scientifically qualified person stands up and says, we don't see an upward trend in the data on Pacific typhoons, well, suddenly they lose standing to address the topic of Pacific typhoons, not because what they said is wrong, but because it's off message. They can marginalize any kind of criticism of the narrative by saying you're not qualified to talk about this because you don't support the narrative. That is then and then having marginalized everyone who doesn't support the narrative, they can turn around and say, well, everybody who counts supports the narrative, so we must be right. Speaker 1: Journalists ignored skeptics and instead offered headlines to anyone prepared to make the most outrageous claims and predictions Speaker 5: doesn't come true. You're still gonna retain your status as an expert, and the media is still gonna come and ask you for your opinion even though you were crazy wrong about your predictions. Speaker 1: But the consensus on climate is not only enforced by those in the climate industry. To explain the broader appeal of the climate alarm, we must look at the politics behind climate. From the start, the climate scare was political. It came from the environmental movement, the sworn enemy of free market industrial capitalism. Speaker 9: Finally, we've got them. We can claim that it is the free markets who are destroying the planet, and we need big government to save us. Speaker 1: The climate problem, it is said, stems from the irresponsible actions of greedy, feckless individuals who have too many babies and drive too much and consume too many products, and of the capitalist corporations who pander to their whims. The solution is for government to have greater power to regulate private companies, but also to guide and reshape the lives and habits of individuals. The Speaker 12: policy agenda has sprawled into micromanaging everybody's lives on the most minute detail, what kind of stove you can use, what kind of heater you can have, how much you can set the thermostat out, where you can drive, what kind of car. You can't according to the the planners, we're not gonna have internal combustion engines an hour from now. Speaker 5: All of these things require the government to get involved. Right? Because the government has to sort of force changes upon the public. If it was up to the public, we wouldn't be buying electric vehicles because, you know, they're impractical. Speaker 1: Support for the climate alarm is now virtually synonymous with disdain for free market capitalism and a Speaker 5: yearning for bigger government. It's liberals versus conservatives in the United States. And generally speaking, liberals are worried that we're destroying the planet, and they're also, of course, for big government. And then conservatives are are at the other end of the spectrum where they a lot of them don't believe that we're destroying the planet and they don't want government involved in their personal lives. Speaker 1: Paying lip service to the climate alarm has become almost universal among those who depend on government for their livelihoods. This includes those in the publicly funded education, arts, and science establishments. Tony Heller recalls his time at Los Alamos Labs. Speaker 3: The entire county of Los Alamos was kept going by government money that we we had the highest incomes in the state. So naturally, people who lived in Los Alamos supported big government because that was where their livelihood came from. That was where their good schools came from. You know, every everything good unless all of us came from the government. So, of course, they were all believers in big governments. Speaker 1: Among the largely publicly funded Western intelligentsia, support for more government spending and regulation is almost a defining moral badge. In these circles, to question the climate alarm is socially unacceptable. To be a climate skeptic is taboo. Speaker 6: Somebody that goes against it, it really does get met with a lot of anger and vitriol and you know, you're called a denier, a science denier, and a heretic. Your colleagues won't engage Speaker 2: with you anymore. You don't get invited to conferences. Your students, may desert you. This is all really terrible. Speaker 1: Professors Henrik Swensmark and Nir Shaviv describe what happened when they published their results on the climatic effects of solar activity. Speaker 14: It was like all hell had broken loose because of this work. I had no idea that things would, escalate as they did, and it completely changed my life. Speaker 11: Once we said that, people didn't like hearing it, and we became a persona non grata. Speaker 14: I mean, I have so many instances of people doing really nasty things. When I applied for a job, a group of scientists writes to the university say they shouldn't hire me. And that's a typical story, Speaker 11: unfortunately. If you don't agree with the standard, polemic, you become an outcast. You'll shun as if you have leprosy. Speaker 1: For professor Sally Balayounas, the personal attacks became too much. Speaker 16: I retired early, and my family said I should have retired even sooner, years sooner. So they noticed the toll. It took a toll on them and me. Speaker 1: Doctor Matthew Wailicki was an assistant professor of geology at the University of Alabama when he decided to speak out about the climate scare. As a result of the backlash, he has decided to leave teaching. Speaker 6: To speak up about climate change in any sort of skeptical way was essentially career suicide. Absolutely. There was no possible way that I would publish in quite a few of the mainstream journals that I was required to publish in. I essentially isolated myself from many of the funding institutions. This is one of the reasons you can build a consensus in a community is because anybody who is skeptical of that consensus essentially gets kicked out Speaker 2: of the community. Speaking out in scientific ways that go contrary to the consensus, I would say is a career killer for people at the early stage of their careers. Speaker 8: If I were 30 years old in a university trying to make a career, I I would certainly keep my mouth shut. And in fact, I I went to some effort to keep my mouth shut when I was younger. I I knew climate was nonsense then, but I was a little bit careful. Speaker 10: If a young person is questioning this, they can't put that in a proposal. The proposal will be denied, and they can't effectively publish because the gatekeeper will keep them out. And so it it would end their career. Speaker 3: You have to go along with with the global warming story. If you don't, you're gonna get cut off. You're gonna lose funding. You're gonna get your career ruined. You're gonna be trashed by the community. You'll be despised by your coworkers. Speaker 1: The so called consensus on climate has itself become a weapon, a form of bullying, intimidation, and censorship used against those who refuse to conform. Speaker 6: It's a it's a tool that people use to bludgeon their opponents and the skeptics and to attack their character. Speaker 1: According to its critics, far from being scientific, the militant intolerant climate consensus represents a devastating assault on free scientific inquiry. Speaker 2: I see my job as a scientist as just laying out the facts and letting people decide what they wanna do. When you can't talk about the facts, things become corrupt. Speaker 16: If you shut the door on ideas, if you say you're not allowed to test it, you're not allowed to have that idea, you've left the realm of science. Speaker 5: I don't think climate researchers will ever back down from their claim that increasing c 02 is the control knob on today's climate system. I I don't think they will ever back down from that no matter what the evidence is. Speaker 10: It's clear it's now a cult completely divorced from science. Speaker 1: But the apparently unstoppable climate scare does not just represent an attack on science. It is starting to shape for us a new kind of society. Environmentalists like to pose as anti establishment, but their demands are well received and piously echoed by King Charles and the archbishop of Canterbury, the BBC, the UN, the EU, by heads of government, the World Bank, and World Economic Forum, in fact, by the entire state funded ruling establishment. Speaker 5: Global warming is like the perfect problem that government can get involved in to grow the influence of government. Speaker 8: It's a wonderful way to increase government power. And, if there's an existential threat out there as worldwide, well, you need a powerful worldwide government, you know, to cope with it. Speaker 17: If you're a climate activist, you're actually facilitating a huge, validation of the government running our lives. Speaker 18: Many environmentalists, most environmental, all environmentalists who consider themselves to be radical progressive alternatives are in fact simply reinforcing the mantras and the mainstream arguments of the entire establishment. Speaker 17: The demands on the government mean that the government suddenly gains the authority to interfere into every nook and cranny of our lives and how we live. Speaker 6: Everything has a climate narrative attached to it. How much you consume, where you spend your money, how much you travel, who you interact with, what types of food you eat, whether you eat meat. Everything has some sort of aspect that can be controlled with a climate lens. Speaker 12: Suppose 20 years ago, somebody had hatched the idea that I would really like to ban cheap energy. I'd really like to control everybody's appliance purchases. I'd really like to tell everybody where they can go. And, basically, I'd like to have dictatorial control over everything. Well, it's not gonna fly. I know everybody would think you're a knot and would ignore you. But fast forward 20 years, that's what's happening. Speaker 1: The publicly funded establishment in the west is so large and powerful that it's able to impose and enforce the official consensus on climate through its control of schools, universities, government, and much of the media. State broadcasters like the BBC exclude climate skeptics. Broadcasting regulatory bodies forbid private stations from disseminating skeptical views, threatening them with having their broadcasting licenses revoked. Speaker 9: What normally happens in an emergency is that all normal forms of openness and democracy have to be suppressed because how else to deal with an emergency? So we are facing a situation, not unlike lockdown, where basically all normal forms of behavior, normal forms of social communication, and normal forms of democracy are essentially ruled out. Activists are even calling for any skepticism to be criminalized. Speaker 1: In certain jobs and professions, it is now dangerous to express dissent on climate. Speaker 9: It's no surprise that people, who are more skeptical will think twice before voicing their concerns because they might risk their careers, they might risk their business, they might risk being sacked. Speaker 7: If you're a professional of any kind in science or law or medicine, if you belong to a professional association or you are in a university, you can be fired for saying what you believe. Speaker 9: The consequence is a censorious authoritarian regime that has to control every move, every word, everything you want to do because everything you do is a potential risk to the survival of mankind. Speaker 1: Climate protesters condemn capitalism, but at their anti capitalist rallies, it's hard to spot anyone who looks like a worker, like a docker or crane driver or steel worker or a beautician or a trucker. The workers, it appears, are totally absent from these rallies and for very good reason. Today's climate alarmists complain not that capitalism isn't producing enough, but that it's producing too much. Speaker 17: The modern capitalist system has led to prosperity. More and more people have more and more things. The modern anti capitalism of the present time is a critique of capitalism that it gives us too much. Speaker 19: They think that the problem with capitalism now is actually that it's giving out too many rewards en masse to ordinary workers. And what they want instead, and this is often very explicit actually, is a much more austere, simple kind of lifestyle in which the mass consumption, the consumption choices of the great bulk of the population are controlled or even prohibited. Speaker 9: You have to consume less. You have to holiday less. You have to drive less. You have to eat less, and so on. Speaker 1: It seems that what upsets many environmentalists is not the failure, but rather the success of capitalism in producing an abundance of affordable goods for the masses. Speaker 17: Ordinary working people, for once, we've arrived at a point in history, in the Western world at least, where mass manufacturers allowed them cheap clothes, cheap food, cheap furniture therefore you get a clash when affluent environmentalists express their disdain for mass consumption. People going on those big huge cruise ships. It's like thousands of them. It's like what are they doing? Oh my God. And all those cruise ships are like ruining Venice, you know, ruining all our beauty. We own them, don't we? They're not what are they going there for? Speaker 19: What you have here is a classic example of class hypocrisy and self interest masquerading as public spirited concern. You could take these kind of green socialists much more seriously if they lived off grid. They cut their own consumption down to the minimum. They never flew. Instead, you get constant talk about how human consumption is destroying the planet. But the people making all this talk show absolutely no signs of reducing their own. Speaker 1: What environmentalists call degrowth is being achieved by the trashing of our conventional energy and transport systems and the forced introduction of expensive and unreliable alternatives. Already, this is having the desired effect on industrial manufacturing, which is straining under the burden of punitive green taxes and regulation and higher energy prices. Speaker 15: The people behind the climate alarm couldn't give a damn about manufacturing. They have nothing to do with it. They don't know people who work in manufacturing whose jobs and lives depend on it. They're not excited by industry or industrial progress. They explicitly wanna shut it down. Speaker 1: Kisii, Kenya, East Africa. According to many leading environmentalists, the world's poorest people should not aspire to the lifestyle of people in the first world. The planet will not cope. Grace Nyakananda is one of the many Africans who do not have electricity or gas to cook with or heat their homes. The resulting indoor smoke from burning wood and dried dung is the deadliest form of pollution in the world. For millions, the cause of lung disease, blindness, and early death. It's not just cheap, reliable electricity that Africa needs. Agricultural productivity here is incredibly low. Increasing it takes fossil fuels to make fertilizer and drive tractors and other farm machinery. Jasper Mashogu is a farmer. Speaker 20: Each and every African wants to develop and increasing, improving agriculture is one of the easiest ways Speaker 1: to Speaker 20: do that. Agriculture is tightly tied to fossil fuels. Fossil fuels that the western nations are saying we should not have access to. Speaker 1: Around a third of the food produced in Africa rots before it ever reaches the mouths of consumers. To prevent this terrible waste, Africa needs plastic packaging, refrigerated lorries, and good roads. All are opposed by Western environmentalists. All come with industrial development. All rely on affordable fossil fuel energy. Diarrhea from drinking dirty water still kills 100 of thousands of African children. But clean water requires large industrial water purification plants and a modern water supply network. And this will come only with cheap energy. Speaker 20: I think it's pretty obvious that the West has got what it has because of fossil fuels. When people say Africa doesn't need fossil fuels, I wonder. I don't think they want what's best for us. They don't want us to develop, and that means we continue being starving. We continue being, poor. Most people don't know what climate change is. They don't care. They just they want food on their table. They want to beat poverty. They want to beat hunger. They need money to better their lives. They want to flourish. That's just it. Speaker 18: When they use the word sustainable development, they're talking about no development. Exactly. I mean, it's the point is is that, you know, to develop sustainably means not to use too much energy, not to use too much carbon, you know, net zero. The idea that you mustn't use too many resources, the fact you mustn't produce enough consumer goods because consumption is bad. So ultimately, you know, the idea of development is out the window. Speaker 9: The greens think the Africans should never use their resources the way the Europeans Speaker 1: or the Americans or the Speaker 9: Canadians or the Australians have used theirs. They are also in favor of punitive taxes, border taxes on any African country that wants to export their goods to Europe if they do use their resource. So that sums up the ethical ruthlessness and depravity of the green agenda. Speaker 1: The climate alarmists have a problem. Many countries in Africa and across Asia are simply ignoring the environmentalist demands of Western governments and international agencies. Communist China is estimated to be building an average of 2 new coal power plants a week. China now uses more coal than the rest of the world combined. Speaker 9: Which is one of the reasons why this whole climate agenda is falling apart because the rest of the world is not cutting emissions, is not moving to renewables. Speaker 1: In the west too, for many people, climate alarmism is wearing thin. Speaker 15: Ordinary people are not stupid. They have seen one ridiculous claim after another fail over and over. What this does is leave people with a profound and justified cynicism about what the scientific establishment says and about what the government says. Speaker 1: To fix the climate crisis, we're told we must give up our cars. Speaker 13: Cars is like fracking. Speaker 1: We must pay more for fuel, heating, clothes, food, fly less, limit where we go. This attack on mass travel, mass tourism, mass consumption holds little appeal to the masses. Speaker 17: People have started to realize it's going to cost them a lot of money to simply live the lives that they weren't leading, that they want to lead. And as soon as that started to happen, I could see people in the United Kingdom, who had previously been indifferent to environmentalism, suddenly think, how dare they do that, right? How dare they try and take away what we consider to be not luxuries, but necessities. Speaker 18: The whole policy of sustainability is about restraint. It's about restrictions, it's about doing less, and that obviously for most people is anathema to their everyday needs. Speaker 17: The fact that there is actually an ideological movement of people who think that cheap mass production, whether it's houses or anything else, is a problem. I mean, for god's sake, no wonder people become disdainful of the kind of middle class outlook of environmentalism. But that is literally what people say. How can we stop people buying cheap things in shops? Speaker 1: When climate protesters climbed onto an underground train in London's East End, they were not cheered on by working commuters. They were heard abuse, pelted, angrily dragged off the train, and received rough treatment on the platform. Speaker 19: If you were to go into a pub, frequented mainly by what the Americans call blue collar workers, you will find that being skeptical about climate change policy is not going to get you thrown out. Quite the contrary, some people will probably buy you a drink. They can tell that behind all the talk about climate, emergency climate crisis, what there actually is, is an animus and a hostility towards them, their lifestyle, their beliefs Speaker 1: Anti establishment politicians and movements are gaining support. Speaker 17: What they what they underestimated was the fury that this would meet, with ordinary people who just say you can't do this, so you suddenly get this new movement. Speaker 1: Many working people are not merely skeptical, but positively angry about the climate alarm and all that flows from it. There is a suspicion or perhaps realization that climate change is an invented scare, driven by self interest and snobbery, cynically promoted by a parasitic publicly funded establishment, hungry for ever more money and power, an assault on the freedom and prosperity of the rest of us.
Saved - July 16, 2024 at 3:29 PM

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Nigel Farage: Net Zero "is about charging us more money... controlling our life and our behaviours, and in terms of the environment, it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever." Do you agree or disagree with Nigel Farage? Credit: @Nigel_Farage @alanvibe https://t.co/j87WfyHl3s

Video Transcript AI Summary
The focus on achieving net zero emissions is seen as a way to control people's lives and behaviors while increasing costs. Some believe it has little impact on the environment. Bikers should have the freedom to ride without interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole net zero agenda that's being pursued. Boris went absolutely full pelt for it. Labour is still on that track. The Tories are now saying, well, we won't do it all tomorrow. We wait till the day after. And frankly, the whole thing is about charging us more money. The whole thing is about controlling our life and our behaviors. And in terms of the environment, it makes absolutely almost no difference whatsoever. So look, you know, bikers want the freedom to ride their bikes and pursue their hobby. They should be allowed to do that without interference.
Saved - September 10, 2024 at 6:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The WEF 15 Minute initiative is spreading quickly in UK cities, leading to traffic-free neighborhoods, low emission zones, and cycle paths. In Oxford, they're even planning to divide the city into districts with limits on how often you can leave. Citizens are pushing back, as seen in their protests against bollards blocking roads.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

The WEF 15 Minute is being introduced rapidly by stealth across Cities in the UK. It means traffic free neighbourhoods, Low emission Zones, surveillance cameras, roads replaced with cycle paths & in Oxford - they’re as brazen as to divide the a City up in districts and limit the number of times you can leave your district in a proposed trial. Clearly British Citizens object to this - here they are tackling bollards where a road has always existed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The bollard is famous for being targeted with arson, involving petrol and flames. It has been run over, smashed, lifted up, and taken away, experiencing various forms of damage and removal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is the famous bollard. Somebody tries to set fire to it. They did something with petrol and it kind of all went up in flames one night. It's been run over. It's been smashed up. It's been lifted up. It's been taken away. It's it's had all kinds of adventures.
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 9:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Local councils are struggling to meet their net zero targets and are shifting the financial burden onto residents. A block of apartments faces a £185 million scheme, costing each resident £40,000 to £66,000 for heating, with the promise that it will be worth it in the end.

@Artemisfornow - Bernie

🤡 NET ZERO - And here it comes! Local councils can’t afford to hit their own fake net zero targets! So they are going to force you to do it instead. This block of apartments has been told they need a £185 million scheme. Costing residents £40 - £66,000 each OR they won’t have heating. Apparently it will be worth it in the end 🤡

Saved - June 25, 2025 at 1:16 AM

@suespeaksup - Sue 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Don't take us for fools — we know what's going on. A local council meeting erupted when a man asked the questions no one else would 👍 https://t.co/EdCwUgVyeV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts the primary concern is everyone's welfare and safety, but believes the individuals in question are illegal migrants, not refugees. The speaker claims it's telling that no one specifies what these people are fleeing from, what wars, countries, or persecution they are escaping. Because of this lack of information, the speaker believes they are by definition illegal immigrants and technically criminals. The speaker states they shouldn't be housed in five-star hotels but in cells. The speaker believes they should not be allowed to leave until they pay for their ticket back. The speaker's question is not where they will be moved to in a year, but how they will be removed from the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lot of the conversation tonight seems to be around the hotel. But if let's not beat around the bush. Okay? Everybody, I think, can agree with me that the biggest concern is everybody's welfare and safety. Now don't take us for fools when you say that these people are refugees. We know they are illegal migrants. If these people were refugees, what are they fleeing from? It's very telling that we're never told what they are fleeing from. What wars are they fleeing from? What countries are they coming from? What are they fleeing? What persecution? We don't know. So we know that they're, by definition, illegal immigrants, which technically makes them criminals. And they should be treated as such. They shouldn't be put up in five star hotels. They should be in cells. And they should be told they are not leaving until they pay for their ticket back. So my question to you is not where are you gonna shift them to in a year's time, how are you going to remove them from the country?
View Full Interactive Feed