reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - January 16, 2024 at 9:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock, a financial titan, has played a significant role in the global financial landscape. It gained dominance during the 2007-2008 financial crisis and was involved in various bailouts. BlackRock's influence extends to politics, with powerful figures joining the firm. In 2019, BlackRock proposed a new approach called "Going Direct," involving central banks injecting money directly into the economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, BlackRock was hired by the Federal Reserve and other central banks to manage bailout programs. BlackRock's Aladdin technology and AI initiatives are shaping the ESG agenda and influencing global finance. Public awareness of BlackRock's power is crucial to challenge its influence.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Mega Thread: The Going Direct Reset and The Financial Coup of BlackRock. We have all heard of “The Great Reset” but unbeknownst to most, there is another reset that has already occurred with the help of financial titan.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock was founded in 1988 by Larry Fink and partners after Fink lost $100M at First Boston. Blackstone's Pete Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman provided a $5M line of credit for 50% of the business, then called Blackstone Financial Management. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/04/fink-201004

Larry Fink's $12 Trillion Shadow As co-founder and C.E.O. of the world’s largest asset-management firm, BlackRock, Larry Fink invests more than $3 trillion—and services another $9 trillion—for a client list that includes Fannie Mae, A.I.G., and the New York Fed. Suzanna Andrews tackles the question: Could one man be too big to fail? vanityfair.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In 1994, BlackRock separated from Blackstone, and by 1999, with $165B AUM, it went public on the NYSE at $14/share. Acquisitions & growth followed, including a merger with Merrill Lynch Investment Managers in 2006. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/22/blackstone-or-blackrock-schwarzman-and-fink-did-it-on-purpose.html

Blackstone or BlackRock, confused? CEOs Steve Schwarzman and Larry Fink actually did it on purpose Blackstone's Schwarzman tells the behind-the-scenes story about the similar names. BlackRock started as part of Blackstone. cnbc.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis catapulted BlackRock into financial dominance. Wall Street turned to BlackRock for help, with firms like AIG, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac all hiring them to sort through their complex credit obligations. #Finance https://www.dw.com/en/blackrock-the-secret-world-power/a-18653761

BlackRock: The secret world power – DW – 08/17/2015 The US financial crisis may officially be over, but one specter still spooks regulators: shadow banking. In their struggle to exorcise industry demons, one name looms large, BlackRock. Miriam Braun reports from New York. dw.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The US government also turned to BlackRock. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and the Federal Reserve both consulted Fink and his firm for help with bailouts, including the rescue of AIG, Bear Stearns, and Citigroup. #Bailouts https://www-ft-com.ezproxy.depaul.edu/content/6ba0b9aa-1221-11e2-868d-00144feabdc0

Fink chats with Geithner sign of influence www-ft-com.ezproxy.depaul.edu

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock's influence grew over the years, with powerful politicians, central bankers, and financial insiders joining as advisors, board members, and executives. This has helped BlackRock ensure it's at the center of important political events. https://archive.ph/1rv5L

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock founder Larry Fink has consistently sought political influence, bringing figures like Friedrich Merz, George Osborne, and Cheryl Mills on board. Former central bankers like Stanley Fischer and Philipp Hildebrand have also joined the firm. He was even sought out by “The Big Guy” Brandon. https://campaignforaccountability.org/middle-class-joe-biden-courts-wall-street-oligarch-blackrocks-larry-fink/

‘Middle Class Joe’ Biden Courts Wall Street Oligarch, BlackRock’s Larry Fink | Campaign for Accountability By: Jeff Hauser, Eleanor Eagan, The Daily Beast, February 9, 2019 Ever since Donald Trump secured the presidency in 2016, there have been those who have argued that Joe Biden is the Democrats’ only chance at victory in 2020. Why? He plays well with working- and middle-class voters who might otherwise vote for Trump. While […] campaignforaccountability.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is where it gets interesting. In August 2019, Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, joined the WEF Board of Trustees, the same day the financial coup began. But first, let's understand the US monetary system, which has two types of money: "bank money" (for the real economy) and "reserve money" (held by banks at the Fed). https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/08/world-economic-forum-appoints-new-members-to-board-of-trustees/

World Economic Forum Appoints New Members to Board of Trustees Adrian Monck, Managing Director, Head of Public Engagement, Tel. +41 (0)79 615 1671; adrian.monck@weforum.org weforum.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Historically, the Fed couldn't "print money" in the traditional sense. Instead, it created reserve money, allowing banks to lend out more bank money in the real economy. But in 2020, the correlation between the Fed balance sheet and commercial bank deposits changed dramatically. This video will give you a detailed background on where money comes from. https://odysee.com/@BestEvidence:b/mommy-where-does-money-come-from:3

Mommy, Where Does Money Come From? In this episode of Mafiacracy Now we see in irrefutably cold detail how the criminal banking cartel maintains not only control of, but sovereign status within, the U.S. odysee.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The gap between Fed-created reserve money and bank-created bank money acts as a type of circuit breaker, and this is why the flood of reserve money that the Fed created in the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008 did not result in a spike in commercial bank deposits.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

By the time of the pandemic bailouts of 2020, the amount of bank money sitting in deposit in commercial banks in the US—a figure which had never shown any correlation with the total amount of reserves held on deposit at the Fed—suddenly spiked in lockstep with the Fed's climbing balance sheet.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock's August 2019 report, "Dealing with the next downturn," proposed a new approach: "Going Direct." This involved central banks injecting money directly into the economy, bypassing traditional channels, and coordinating fiscal policy through "standing emergency fiscal facilities." fullertreacymoney.com/system/data/fi…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock's August 2019 report, "Dealing with the next downturn," proposed a new approach: "Going Direct." This involved central banks injecting money directly into the economy, bypassing traditional channels, and coordinating fiscal policy through "standing emergency fiscal facilities." https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-08-15/blackrock-s-ex-central-bankers-have-bold-vision-to-beat-recession#xj4y7vzkg

BlackRock’s Ex-Central Bankers Have Bold Vision to Beat Recession While stopping short of “helicopter money,” they say monetary and fiscal policy need to be more explicitly coordinated to boost growth. bloomberg.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The theme of the 2019 symposium—which brings together central bankers, policymakers, economists and academics to discuss economic issues and policy options—was "Challenges for Monetary Policy," and BlackRock's paper, published a week in advance of the event, was carefully crafted to set the parameters of that discussion. https://www.kansascityfed.org/research/jackson-hole-economic-symposium/challenges-for-monetary-policy/

Challenges for Monetary Policy The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City hosted dozens of central bankers, policymakers, academics and economists from around the world at its annual economic policy symposium, Aug. 22-24, 2019, in Jackson Hole, Wyo. kansascityfed.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Blackrock at this time in 2019 Blackrock was worried about the ability of central banks to manage a downturn, in their aforementioned report they state the need not for “The Great Reset” but “The Going Direct Reset”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough. That response will likely involve “going direct”: Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders. Going direct, which can be organised in a variety of different ways, works by: 1) bypassing the interest rate channel when this traditional central bank toolkit is exhausted, and; 2) enforcing policy coordination so that the fiscal expansion does not lead to an offsetting increase in interest rates.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is important to understand. What they came up with is a special purpose facility they called “Standing Emergency Fiscal Facilities”(SEFF). They would inject bank money directly into the commercial accounts of various public or private sector entities.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“Any additional measures to stimulate economic growth will have to go beyond the interest rate channel and “go direct” – when a central bank crediting private or public sector accounts directly with money. One way or another, this will mean subsidising spending – and such a measure would be fiscal rather than monetary by design. This can be done directly through fiscal policy or by expanding the monetary policy toolkit with an instrument that will be fiscal in nature, such as credit easing by way of buying equities. This implies that an effective stimulus would require coordination between monetary and fiscal policy – be it implicitly or explicitly.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Now remember this was in August 2019, just a few month before COVID entered the fray. Less than one month after BlackRock proposed this revolutionary new type of fiscal intervention that the central banks began implementing that very idea.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here you can see the correlation between the Fed balance sheet and commercial bank deposits.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In 2020, the #COVID19 pandemic provided the perfect excuse for central banks to pump trillions of dollars directly into the economy. But who would manage this unprecedented bailout? The answer: BlackRock.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Were you aware that in March 2020, the Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage three separate bailout programs during the economic crisis? https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/27/business/coronavirus-blackrock-federal-reserve.html?smid=nytcore-iosshare&referringSource=articleShare

Fed Releases Details of BlackRock Deal for Virus Response (Published 2020) BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, will earn relatively modest fees for helping the Federal Reserve run a bond-buying program to steady markets unsettled by the pandemic. nytimes.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock was hired to manage the Fed's commercial mortgage-backed securities program, purchases of newly issued corporate bonds, and purchases of existing investment-grade bonds and credit ETFs. Was this a bailout bonanza for BlackRock? 🤔 This wasn't just an opportunity for BlackRock to gain access to government funds, but also a chance to bail out one of its most valuable assets: iShares, the collection of ETFs it acquired from Barclays for $13.5 billion in 2009, which had grown to a $1.9 trillion giant by 2020.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As Wall Street On Parade reported, BlackRock was allowed by the Fed to buy its own corporate bond ETFs, with taxpayers potentially eating losses that might otherwise accrue to billionaire Larry Fink's company and its investors. 🤯 https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/06/blackrock-is-bailing-out-its-etfs-with-fed-money-and-taxpayers-eating-losses-its-also-the-sole-manager-for-335-billion-of-federal-employees-retirement-funds/

BlackRock Is Bailing Out Its ETFs with Fed Money and Taxpayers Eating Losses; It’s Also the Sole Manager for $335 Billion of Federal Employees’ Retirement Funds By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: June 4, 2020 ~  BlackRock, the international investment management firm run by billionaire Larry Fink, has played an wallstreetonparade.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The New York Times tried to cover the swindle by highlighting that BlackRock would earn no more than $7.75 million per year for the main bond portfolio it managed. But they missed the point: BlackRock's revenue rose 11.5% to $261 million in Q2 2020 due to a surge in ETFs.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

However the WSJ put that in context https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-hires-blackrock-to-help-calm-markets-its-etf-business-wins-big-11600450267

Fed Hires BlackRock to Help Calm Markets. Its ETF Business Wins Big. The central bank’s market intervention helped the largest U.S. provider of corporate bond exchange-traded funds get larger wsj.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

From the article: “Even if BlackRock waives its fees from the purchases that the Fed is making, the fact that it is associated with this program means that other investors are going to rush into BlackRock funds. BlackRock obviously generates fees from those flows. So the net result is that this is very lucrative for BlackRock.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

After the Fed allowed BlackRock to bail out its own ETF funds, iShares' assets under management surpassed $3 trillion. But it wasn't just the Fed; central banks worldwide were hiring BlackRock to manage their market interventions.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In April 2020, the Bank of Canada and in May 2020, the Swedish central bank, the Riksbank, both hired BlackRock's Financial Markets Advisory (FMA) to help with their corporate bond buying programs. BlackRock was now dictating central bank interventions globally. https://www.bankofcanada.ca/2020/04/bank-canada-introduce-corporate-bond-purchase-program/

Bank of Canada to Introduce a Corporate Bond Purchase Program In order to support the efficient and continuous functioning of financial markets, the Bank of Canada is announcing its intention to introduce a Corporate Bond Purchase Program (CBPP). bankofcanada.ca

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In 1993, BlackRock developed Aladdin (short for "asset, liability, debt and derivative investment network"), a proprietary investment analysis technology that's now the core of BlackRock Solutions. It combines portfolio management, trading, compliance, operations, and risk oversight. https://www.blackrock.com/aladdin/resources/faqs

Frequently Asked Questions | ALADDIN® by Blackrock Frequently asked questions about BlackRock's Aladdin software platform - value, usage, relationship with eFront and more. Explore our FAQs now. blackrock.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Today, Aladdin is used by over 200 institutions, managing well in excess of $21 trillion in assets. That's a significant chunk of the world's wealth, all dependent on BlackRock's proprietary software. https://www.ft.com/content/5ba6f40e-4e4d-11ea-95a0-43d18ec715f5

BlackRock’s black box: the technology hub of modern finance Used by rival fund managers, the reach of the Aladdin platform raises possible conflicts of interest ft.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

As we know, BlackRock is increasingly committed to leveraging artificial intelligence, learning algorithms, and other cutting-edge technologies. The company is replacing underperforming human stockpickers with computer algorithms, like their project "Monarch."https://www.ft.com/content/e689a67e-2911-11e8-b27e-cc62a39d57a0

BlackRock bets on algorithms to beat the fund managers Larry Fink’s firm hopes to build a ‘quant’ powerhouse through its active equities arm  ft.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

But what is BlackRock's end game with Aladdin and its AI initiatives? Well, CEO Larry Fink writes an annual "letter to CEOs," outlining the company's direction. In recent years, he's been advocating for the ESG agenda, emphasizing sustainability and the transition to a net-zero world. https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/ai

BlackRock AI Labs | BlackRock The BlackRock AI Labs is the heart of AI innovation at BlackRock. Learn more about our leadership, research, and job opportunities. blackrock.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

ESG is a set of metrics that are being developed by globalist think tanks to serve as a corporate social credit system. If corporations fail to comply with globalist policies, their ESG rating will take a hit, deterring investors. Companies like BlackRock are using their power as asset managers to shape the corporate world according to their will, driving the ESG agenda forward. They've even launched Aladdin Climate, a software application that measures the climate risk of investments.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock is leveraging its powerful technology, AI, and influence over global finance to shape the world's economy, driving the ESG agenda and shaping the behavior of corporations. It's crucial to understand the implications of this shift. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3763042

A New Take on Voice: The Influence of BlackRock’s 'Dear CEO' Letters We examine whether broad-based public engagement by institutional investors influences the behavior of portfolio firms. We investigate this question in the cont papers.ssrn.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

BlackRock is not just an investment firm. It's become a financial, political, and technological colossus with the ability to direct investments of the world's largest institutions. Its influence stretches far and wide, affecting corporations and individuals alike.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The future of the world according to BlackRock is dominated by unaccountable AI algorithms directing investments, digital transactions, and ESG rankings that can make or break companies. It's a world where power is centralized and wielded by a select few.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Fink’s 2022 Letter to Investors entitled “The Power of Capitalism” lays out the ESG Agenda: “It’s been two years since I wrote that climate risk is investment risk. And in that short period, we have seen a tectonic shift of capital. Sustainable investments have now reached $4 trillion. Actions and ambitions towards decarbonization have also increased. This is just the beginning – the tectonic shift towards sustainable investing is still accelerating. Whether it is capital being deployed into new ventures focused on energy innovation, or capital transferring from traditional indexes into more customized portfolios and products, we will see more money in motion. Every company and every industry will be transformed by the transition to a net zero world. The question is, will you lead, or will you be led?”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

He continues: “Stakeholder capitalism is all about delivering long-term, durable returns for shareholders. And transparency around your company’s planning for a net zero world is an important element of that. But it’s just one of many disclosures we and other investors ask companies to make. As stewards of our clients’ capital, we ask businesses to demonstrate how they’re going to deliver on their responsibility to shareholders, including through sound environmental, social, and governance practices and policies.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

ESG is a totalitarian attempt towards the financialization of nature through what is called "natural asset corporations. Otherwise known as extortion.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Iain Davis gives a great summary of what is going on in his article “Seizing Everything: The Theft of the Global Commons”: “This will be achieved using Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics. Assets will be rated using environmental, social and governance (ESG) benchmarks for sustainable business performance. Any business requiring market finance, perhaps through issuing climate bonds, or maybe green bonds for European ventures, will need those bonds to have a healthy ESG rating. A low ESG rating will deter investors, preventing a project or business venture from getting off the ground. A high ESG rating will see investors rush to put their money in projects that are backed by international agreements. In combination, financial initiatives like NACs and ESGs are converting SDGs into market regulations.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

It amounts to a Corporate Social Score. Let’s go back to Finks letter earlier this year as it gives us a glimpse at the ESG agendas trajectory: “Finally, a less discussed aspect of the war is its potential impact on accelerating digital currencies. The war will prompt countries to re-evaluate their currency dependencies. Even before the war, several governments were looking to play a more active role in digital currencies and define the regulatory frameworks under which they operate. The US central bank, for example, recently launched a study to examine the potential implications of a US digital dollar. A global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption. Digital currencies can also help bring down costs of cross-border payments, for example when expatriate workers send earnings back to their families. As we see increasing interest from our clients, BlackRock is studying digital currencies, stablecoins and the underlying technologies to understand how they can help us serve our clients.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The good news is that the public is finally becoming aware of BlackRock's importance on the global financial stage. This is reflected in an increasing number of protests targeting BlackRock and its activities, even if they don't fully grasp the extent of the agenda.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Critics argue that BlackRock's "sustainable investing" push is a scam, accusing the company of greenwashing. However, this misses the underlying point: BlackRock is interested in turning its financial wealth into real-world power, serving its own agenda. https://nyunews.com/opinion/2021/10/18/larry-fink-climate-hypocrite/

Editorial: Larry Fink is a climate hypocrite - Washington Square News NYU trustee and BlackRock CEO Laurence Fink wrote an op-ed in The New York Times last Wednesday arguing that wealthy countries must continue to invest more money in green infrastructure. In the article, Fink emphasizes how many countries in the Global South cannot shoulder the cost of building climate-friendly infrastructure; he also points out how... nyunews.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Some US state governments have begun to divest state funds from BlackRock due to growing public discontent. This shows that the political class understands the public's opposition to the BlackRock/ESG/corporate governance agenda. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Republicans-Withdraw-1-Billion-From-BlackRock-Due-To-Its-ESG-Policies.html

Republicans Withdraw $1 Billion From BlackRock Due To Its ESG Policies | OilPrice.com Republican states are divesting from BlackRock due to concerns over its ESG investment policies and the effect they will have on the energy sector oilprice.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

19 states' attorneys general even signing a letter to Larry Fink in August calling him out on his agenda of social control. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/executive-management/BlackRock%20Letter.pdf

Page Not Found | Office of the Attorney GeneralAsset 1 It appears you've tried to reach a page that doesn't exist or has been moved. If you need further assistance -- please Contact Us or return to the home page. texasattorneygeneral.gov

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The bottom line is that public awareness of BlackRock's rise and its influence on global affairs is crucial. It is only through public opinion that we can challenge the wealth and power of such a financial behemoth. BlackRock is one of the top institutional shareholders in companies like Walmart, Coca-Cola, Moderna, Exxon, and Amazon. But who owns BlackRock? Well, it turns out that one of the top institutional holders is The Vanguard Group.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This thread only scratches the surface. To truly grasp the extent of BlackRock's influence, Vanguard is a story for another thread but have a look at this to get a sense of Vanguard’s and Blackrocks combined power. https://www.investors.com/etfs-and-funds/sectors/sp500-one-investor-is-the-largest-owner-of-two-thirds-of-u-s-companies/

Access to this page has been denied. investors.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Blackrock is a leviathan, encompassing every aspect of society. As you can see, it sets the agenda that governments, central banks and corporations follow. At this point it would be prudent to take them at their word that they are building a worldwide AI System control grid that can derank businesses, institutions and eventually individuals if they do not comply with the ESG Agenda.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This falls in line perfectly with Agenda 2030 and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. The conspiracy is an open one if you know where to look. With the 2020 Going Direct Reset, BlackRock had conquered the planet, acting in every conceivable role, violating conflict-of-interest rules, and cementing its position as The Company That Owns The World. 🌎 https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/2018/blackrock-the-company-that-owns-the-world/

Blackrock – The company that owns the world? Blackrock – The company that owns the world? investigate-europe.eu

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you have enjoyed this please consider giving me a follow so you don’t miss any future threads. Like These 👇🏻 https://t.co/xbcWoOBQHm

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Trinityaudiobot

Saved - February 4, 2024 at 12:51 AM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

BREAKING: @BlackRock Recruiter Who “Decides People’s Fate” Spills Info on Company’s World Impact “It’s not who the president is- it’s who’s controlling the wallet of the president” “You got $10K? You can buy a senator" “War is real f***ing good for business” #BlackRockExposed https://t.co/DZIy1DuZKF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features an undercover reporter interviewing Serge Varley, a recruiter at BlackRock, one of the world's leading asset and investment managers. Varley discusses how financial institutions like BlackRock buy politicians and control the world through diversification and acquisition. He also reveals how the Ukraine-Russia war is good for business, as it creates volatility and profit opportunities. Varley mentions that news channels benefit from war as well. He advises the reporter to do the opposite of what Jim Cramer advises for making money. Varley believes that normal people don't care about these matters. The video ends with a teaser for part 2 and a comment from BlackRock stating that they were reached out for comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they don't wanna be in the news. They they don't want people to talk about them. They don't Speaker 1: wanna be anywhere on on the radar. Speaker 2: Why not? Speaker 0: It's some film, but I suspect it's probably because it's easier Speaker 3: to do things when people aren't thinking Speaker 0: about it. All of these financial institutions, they buy politicians. You can take this big sum of money, and then you can start to buy people. Speaker 3: I work for, a company called BlackRock. Speaker 4: Meet Serge Barlett, A recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 0: Let me tell you, it's not who is the president. Speaker 3: It's who's controlling the the wall. Speaker 5: So it's it's Speaker 2: And who's that? Speaker 0: The hedge funds across the banks. These guys won't buy that. Contain financing. Yep. You can buy it. And obviously, we have this system voice. 1st, there's percentage. And these guys You got $10 you can buy So Speaker 6: I'll give you 500 k right now. No question asked. Speaker 7: Yeah. I Speaker 0: did the 2 weeks to be done. Speaker 7: Just like that. Speaker 2: Everybody do that? Does Blackhawk do that? Speaker 8: It doesn't matter who wins. Speaker 9: They're so good. They're they're my father. Speaker 4: Here is Serge Varley on how good war is for BlackRock's Business. Speaker 0: Do you Speaker 7: have any, thoughts on the Ukraine Russia war? Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, I I do have thoughts. What do you Speaker 7: what do you mean? Speaker 0: Ukraine It's good for business. You you know. Alright? I'll give you an example. Russia Russia blows up Ukraine Grain sales. Price of wheat's gonna go mad up. So Ukrainian economy is tied very largely Speaker 1: to the wheat market, Global wheat market. Prices of bread and, Speaker 0: you know, and literally everything goes up now. This is fantastic if you're trading. Volatility creates opportunity to make profit. War is real fucking good for business. It's exciting when goes wrong. Right? BlackRock manages 20 trillion. It's a comprehensible number. Speaker 4: BlackRock Serge Varley says all of this is above a normal person's understanding. Speaker 3: You're like a undercover reporter. Speaker 4: Hi. I'm James O'Keefe with OMG News. Here we are with our latest story this time on BlackRock, of the world's leading asset and investment managers, which owns significant shares of companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Anheuser Busch, Meta, Target, Procter and Gamble, Comcast, CNN, Fox, and yes, Pfizer, just to name a few. At OMG, we do not shy away from exposing powerful companies, and we're not afraid of powerful So to do that, what better place to start a hidden camera investigation than into a self described gatekeeper At BlackRock. Speaker 7: Like, you're kinda like a fucking gamekeeper at BlackRock. Speaker 0: Yeah. I am. I I decide people's fate. Every In May, I literally decide how somebody's height is going to be shaped. Yeah. It's So it's just like you hear where Speaker 3: it is. I know Speaker 4: Introducing Serge Varley, Whose LinkedIn says he's worked for Morgan Stanley, Citadel, and now as a recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 3: I work for, a company called BlackRock. Speaker 0: I'm not actually Speaker 3: a finance guy. I just I know what happens because I'm including people for duty's sake. Mhmm. Speaker 0: I'm the person who heads on people to my other firms, so I would approach them, but, hey. This is a good reason why it's not there for us. Speaker 4: Serge tells us who really runs the world, how they do it, and just how much it costs to buy people, like politicians. Speaker 0: Let me tell you, it's not the truth. Speaker 3: Who's the person next? It's Chris controlling the the wall. Speaker 5: So it's it's Speaker 2: And who's that? Speaker 0: The hedge funds across the banks. Stop. If you guys want bank debt. In financing, Yep. You can buy your candidates. So get outside. All of these financial institutions, they buy politicians. Speaker 7: How do they run Speaker 0: the world? You acquire stuff. You diversify. You acquire. You keep acquiring. You spend whatever you make in acquiring more. And at a certain point, your risk level is is super low. Like, imagine you've invested in, like, 10 different industries from food to To drinks, to, like, technology. Right? If one one of them fails, it doesn't matter. You have 9 others to pick you up. The risk management is is inherently just about everything. And In the finance space, it's all about it's a it's well, it's all about the money you make. You don't you don't let it sit. You keep using it over and over and just Speaker 7: Reinvest. Speaker 0: Yeah. And it exponentially grows. Speaker 7: And then once you just own a little bit of everything, is that where the control? Speaker 0: You own a little bit of everything, and that little bit of everything gives you so much money on a yearly basis that you can take this big Sell the money, and then you can start to buy people. And obviously, we have this system in place. 1st, there's the senators. And these guys you got $10 you can buy soon. Speaker 8: It doesn't matter who who lands. Speaker 7: They're so mad. Speaker 9: They're they're my father. Speaker 6: I can give you 500 k right now. No questions asked. Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't think it needs to be done. They're like, yeah. Of course. Why not? Speaker 2: Just like everybody do that? Does BlackRock do that? Speaker 4: The BlackRock Recruiter also tells us about how the US government relies on BlackRock for their economic simulation Computational power. Speaker 0: Economic simulation. They need to understand the impact of something. Right? They're gonna, like, raise the interest, for Exactly. It's gonna create this cascade of various factors that are they're not sure what's gonna do, basically. Speaker 4: And just how great The Ukraine war is for business. Speaker 0: Do you Speaker 7: have any, thoughts on the Ukraine Russia war? Speaker 0: Ukraine is good for business. Speaker 2: K. Mama. Speaker 5: I'll give Speaker 0: you an example. Russia Russia blows up Ukraine grain to us. Price of wheat is gonna go mad up. So what are you gonna do for your trading firm? The moment that news hits, within a millisecond, you're gonna pump you're gonna pump trades into, into, wherever the weed suppliers are. And if their stocks, within an hour or 2, that stock goes And then you sell, and you just made I don't know. Or maybe sell. Speaker 7: Why would a news channel Come on. Aside in war. Speaker 0: Because it's also good for business I mean, what's news news? Right? What does news feed on? They feel like Babishy. They keep on up events. That's what people like to watch. So when it happens, it seems good business. Viewers. Stop. Stop. When nothing's happening, you watch your news. I don't watch your news. Speaker 7: Yes. They're all pushing, like, the same Talking point like, you generally, when you look at news, like Speaker 0: Stop again. Ukrainian economy is tied very largely to Speaker 1: the wheat market, Global weak market? Speaker 0: This is fantastic if you're trading. Volatility creates opportunity to make profit. War is And this is the business. It's exciting when Speaker 3: shit goes wrong. Speaker 4: Right? Serge also speaks on BlackRock influenced news and even gave our journalist Some tips. Speaker 7: Based on everything we know now Uh-huh. When they say to sell, does that mean we should buy? Speaker 0: So, yeah. It's like, you know Jim Cramer? If you do, exactly the opposite of what he's advising, you actually make money. Yeah. It's like it's called the the inverse radar. They they don't wanna be in the news. They they don't want people to talk about them. They don't Speaker 1: wanna be anywhere on on the radar. Speaker 2: Why not? Why? Speaker 0: It's on film, but I suspect it's probably because it's easier To do Speaker 3: things when people aren't paying by it. Speaker 4: And when Surge was asked about insider trading and if Larry Fink recently sold a $100,000,000 in BlackRock shares here is what he said. Speaker 7: Larry Fink recently sold a $100,000,000 worth of BlackRock. Oh, Speaker 0: Damn, Larry. That's not a good sign. The people who trade and make money, they do this at the moment the out. And that invoice typically Hey. Typically is disseminated at private levels first before it gets, arranged. If you wanna invest smart. There's a tracker that tracks all politicians and where they have their stocks. Preemptively, if the stock price if we think the stock price is gonna tank, we're gonna sell so that so that we we sell it high, it tanks, and we buy back. And we made well, we didn't make, but we preserved preserved a few male. Speaker 4: But perhaps the most remarkable and profound comment By the BlackRock recruiter is the suggestion that nobody is going to care about what he is saying here or confessing here. Because as he says, quote, normal people don't give a shit. Speaker 3: You're like a undercover reporter. Speaker 7: Really? No. No. Don't not all worry about this stuff? Speaker 0: I don't know. No. No. People don't get a shit. This is this is beyond them. Speaker 4: That these types of questions my report have asked are beyond all of you. The answer is something that He's been fooled. There is no question that many Americans are still asleep who may not want to wake up from their necessary illusions. But we hope and believe by showing these tapes of this Black Rock gatekeeper speaking so plainly On so many topics that not only we wake up people, but also inspire others to come forward on institutions Like BlackRock. Oh, and this is just part 1. Stay tuned tomorrow for my meeting with Serge Marley. We also reached out for comment to BlackRock, and here's what they had to say.
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 9:19 AM

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

⚠️ THÉ BIG FOUR "The largest firms in the world are: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley. The shareholders of these companies are: ▪︎Bank of America: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), 🧶

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon. ▪︎JP Morgan: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital Investor World, Capital Global Research Investors, Northern Trust Corp and Bank of Mellon.

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

▪︎Citigroup: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital Investor world, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Mgmt Capital and Bank of NY Mellon. ▪︎Wells Fargo: Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers. ▪︎Goldman Sachs: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity), Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

▪︎Morgan Stanley: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity, Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates. The BIG FOUR are at the core of all these

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

banks: State Street State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). Behind them are the Bilderberg Group, Tri-Lateral Commission and the Committee of 300, popularly called the #DeepState/#Globalists/ #Illuminatis among other names. So the 8 largest

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

financial companies in the US (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, USA Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by 10 shareholders and we have 4 companies that participate in all decisions: #BlackRock, State Street,

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

#Vanguard and #Fidelity. The American Federal Reserve is also controlled by these four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control the monetary policy of the US and the world. From these companies, there are branches

@AIustitiae - Angelus iustitiae

reaching out to micro and small companies, and each does its part without knowing what others do, forming a whole capable of keeping the system hidden and functional." Now YOU know it!

Saved - July 19, 2023 at 9:02 PM

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard alone manage nearly as much money as the entire US GDP. They use that money to advance “racial equity audits” and “emissions caps.” But it’s not their money. It’s yours. @JohnStossel

Video Transcript AI Summary
Major asset managers like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have been using their clients' money to influence companies' decisions. For instance, Apple was pressured into adopting a racial equity audit when a majority of its shareholders voted for it. Similarly, Chevron had to change its policies on emissions after these asset managers voted in favor of a emissions cap. While reducing emissions and promoting diversity in the boardroom may have merit, it is questionable to impose these agendas on companies that may not have wanted them. The primary responsibility of asset managers and corporate boards should be to prioritize the financial interests of their clients and shareholders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The key difference is almost every major asset manager for the last several years not only buys shares in those companies, they use their clients' money, probably many people listening to this program, to then tell those companies that, hey, we're the shareholder. We, BlackRock, or the shareholder of you, Apple, who were going to vote in favor of a racial equity audit at Apple. This is a true story in 2022. The Apple's board did not want to adopt but effectively was forced into adopting when a majority of Apple's own shareholders voted for that racial equity audit. Or Chevron, a company that did not want to adopt a scope three emissions cap, was effectively forced to change its policies after BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard all voted in favor of a scope three emissions cap. So what's wrong with fewer emissions? What's wrong with having more minorities in the boardroom? Well, we could debate that. Those are deep issues. I don't think there's inherently anything wrong with either of those things. But it's a misuse of somebody else's money to foist that agenda onto a company whose board didn't even want to adopt it because the job of an asset manager and the job of a corporate board is to advance the financial interests of their clients and of their shareholders, period.
Saved - August 13, 2023 at 11:03 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Does Blackrock Run The World? 88% of public companies have their largest shareholder as one of three entities.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The majority of companies on the S&P 500 have State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard as their largest shareholders. BlackRock, with a worth of $10 trillion, is only surpassed by the GDPs of the US and China. Their influence extends to defense contracts, as seen with Raytheon. This pattern is also evident in Hollywood and the pharmaceutical industry, where these companies essentially hold a monopoly. Their control is so significant that they can remove boards and replace CEOs. However, they argue that having a 50% market share does not violate monopoly laws.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 8% of the companies on S&P 500. The largest shareholder is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000? Only 2 countries Have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has. US and China, that's how big BlackRock is. And then you see their influence in defense contracts. If you Google top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, Vanguard. K. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical, and you're like, wait a minute. These guys essentially have a monopoly. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like, But they say 50% is a monopoly law. That is already a
Saved - September 5, 2023 at 6:11 PM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

They don't want you to know this. RFK explains how BlackRock, State-street and Vanguard own a huge portion of the S&P 500 companies They are also purchasing large numbers of homes in the USA. RFK Jr claims that by 2030 they could own 60% of the single family homes in America.  

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three major corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, collectively own each other, essentially forming one giant corporation. They also own 89% of the S&P 500 and have now set their sights on buying every single family home in America. If they continue on this path, they will own 60% of all single-family homes in the country by 2030. The CEO of BlackRock, Larry Fink, is on the board of the World Economic Forum, which promotes the idea of owning nothing and being happy. These corporations often outbid individuals looking to buy homes, using LLCs with ambiguous names that can be traced back to BlackRock.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: More importantly, there's 3 giant corporations, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard, which own collectively, they own each other, so it's really 1 giant corporation, but they also own 89% of the S&P 500. They own everything. They've now decided to to buy every single family home in America. So if they stay on the current trajectory, they will own 60% of the homes in this country, single family homes by 2,030. They literally are trying to buy everything and the head of it, Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, is on the board of World Economic Forum and they've said, we want this great said, which is you will own nothing and you will be happy. Well, they're on their way to making sure that we don't own anything. So you all probably have heard of people who are about to buy a home, and somebody comes in with at the last minute with a cash cash or offer and and statuses off the out of the market. Right. And it's usually an LLC with an ambiguous name. But if you trace that up, you'll find it's owned by BlackRock. Wow.
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 10:04 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

BlackRock will own everything very soon

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, a major investment firm, owns a significant portion of United States banks, pharma companies, and mainstream media. They also oversee a large percentage of global stock trading and manage billions of dollars in assets. Additionally, they have substantial investments in media companies like Fox, CBS, Comcast, and Disney. BlackRock is also a significant institutional investor in tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon. Recently, they have been acquiring homes and driving up mortgage prices, leading to concerns about homeownership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ice cream so good. But before they finally make BlackRock, BlackRock owns most United States banks. They own all major pharma companies and mainstream media. They oversee 10% of all stocks traded worldwide. They manage over $10,000,000,000 in assets which is happening in United States GDP. They, BlackRock and Bank of Art own 18% of Fox, 16% of CBS, 13% of Comcast, which also self controlled NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, Sky News, and they own 12% of Disney. These are the biggest institutional investors of Google, Facebook, Amazon, and now they're buying up all the homes and artificially inflating your mortgage, so you will own nothing and be happy. I have to
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 5:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
BlackRock, the world's largest asset management company, has gained immense power and influence. It has permeated every aspect of our lives, owning a stake in almost everything we encounter daily. This documentary explores how BlackRock became a force to be reckoned with, delving into the players and forces behind its rise. Additionally, it sheds light on the Rockefeller family's use of oil money to shape the US medical and education systems, along with their controversial depopulation agendas. Watch these eye-opening documentaries for valuable insights. Support James Corbett's work.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

How BlackRock Conquered the World James Corbett has dropped another epic documentary on how Blackrock became one of the worlds largest and most powerful asset management companies, now basically being the 4th branch of government with far reaching political influence and clout through owning a piece of literally everything we smell, see, touch, and generally use on a daily basis. They've become inescapable force that has permeated their way into all of our lives, and James goes through the full history of how this company came to be, and which players and forces got them there. If you haven't seen "How/Why Big Oil Conquered the World" yet either, then you should watch those as well if you have the time. They provide some incredible insights into how the Rockefeller family used their oil money to build the US medical and education system as we know it today in near entirety, along with their diabolical depopulation agendas involving environmental toxins, petroleum derived pharmaceutical drugs, and vaccinations beginning with Jonas Salk. Links below. Support his work.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, the world's largest alternative investment firm, has gained significant power and influence over the global economy. Founded in 1988, BlackRock has grown to manage over $21 trillion in assets, making it a major player in the financial world. The company's proprietary software, Aladdin, is used by over 200 institutions to analyze risk and manage portfolios. BlackRock has also embraced the ESG (environmental, social, and governance) agenda, pushing for sustainable investing and decarbonization. However, there are concerns about BlackRock's influence and its potential to shape the course of civilization. Some state governments have even started divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, let's play a little game. Let's imagine you're JoQ normie, and you need to run out for some groceries. You hop in the car and head to the store. What store do you go to? Why Walmart of course. And being an unwitting victim of the sugar conspiracy, What do you buy when you're there? Coke, naturally. And you can get jabbed at Walmart these days, right? Well then you might as well make sure to get your 6th Moderna booster while you're there. And don't forget to fill up with gas on your way home. Is this creeping you out? Then why don't you shut yourself in your house and never go out shopping again? That'll show them. After all, you can always order everything you need from Amazon, can't you? Are you noticing a pattern here? Yes. In case you haven't heard, BlackRock Inc. Is now officially everywhere. It owns everything. Sadly for us however, the creepy corporate claws of the BlackRock beast Aren't content simply to clutch onto a near plurality of the shares of every major corporation in the world? No. BlackRock is now digging its towers in even further and flexing its muscles, putting that inconceivable wealth and influence to use by completely reordering the economy, creating scandemics, and shaping the course of civilization in the process. Let's face it, if you're not concerned about the power BlackRock wields over the world by this point, Then you're not paying attention. But don't worry if all of this is news to you. Most people have no idea Where this investment giant came from? How it clawed its way to the top of the Wall Street dogpile? Or what it has planned for your future? Let's fill in that gap in public understanding. I'm James Corbit of The Corbit Report and today you're going to learn the story of how BlackRock conquered the world. Hold on a second. I hear you interject. I've got this. BlackRock was founded as a mergers and acquisitions firm in 1985 by a couple of ex Lemenites and has since gone on to become the world's largest alternative investment firm, right? Wrong. That's Blackstone Inc, currently headed by Steven Schwartzman. But don't feel bad if you confuse the 2. The Blackstone BlackRock confusion was done on purpose. In fact, BlackRock began in 1988 as a business proposal by investment banker, Larry Fink and a gaggle of business partners. The appropriately named Fink Had managed to lose $100,000,000 in a single quarter in 1986 as a manager at First Boston Investment Bank by betting the wrong way on interest rates. Humbled by this humiliating setback, or so the story goes, Fink turned lemons into lemonade by crafting a vision for an investment firm with an emphasis on risk management. Never again would Larry Fink be caught off guard by a market downturn. Fink assembled some partners and brought his proposal to Black Stone co founders Pete Peterson and Steven Schwartzman, who liked the idea so much that they agreed to extend Fink a $5,000,000 line of credit in exchange for a 50% share in the business. Originally named Blackstone Financial Management, Think's operation was turning a nice profit within months, had quadrupled the value of its assets in 1 year, and had grown the value of its portfolio under management to $17,000,000,000 by 1992. Now firmly established as a viable business in its own right, Schwartzman and Fink began musing about spinning the firm off from Blackstone and taking it public. Schwartzman suggested giving the newly independent company a name with black in it As a nod to its Blackstone origins and Fink, taking roguish delight in the inevitable confusion and annoyance such a move would cause, propose the name BlackRock. Speaker 1: So Larry and I were sitting down and and he said, what what do you think about, you know, sort of having a family Name, you know, with with black in it. And I I said, that that's that's I think that's a good idea. And I think it was They put on the table either black pebble or or or or or black rock. And and, So so he said, you know, if we do something like this, all of our people will kill us. Speaker 0: The 2 evidently share the same sense of humor. There is a little confusion between the companies, Schwartzman now concedes, And every time that happens, I get a real chuckle. But a shared taste for causing unnecessary confusion was not enough to keep the partners together. By 1994, the 2 had fallen out of her compensation for new hires or perhaps due to distress over Schwartzman's ongoing divorce depending who's telling the story. And Schwarzman sold Blackstone's holdings in BlackRock for a mere $240,000,000. That was certainly a heroic mistake, Schwarzman admits. Having made the split with Blackstone and established BlackRock as its own entity, Fink was firmly on the path that would lead to his company becoming the global driving financial coal losses that it is today. In 1999 with its assets under management standing at $165,000,000,000, BlackRock went public on the New York Stock Exchange at $14 per share. Expanding its services into analytics and risk management with its proprietary Aladdin Enterprise Investment System. More on which later. The firm acquired mutual fund company, State Street Research and Management in 2004 merged with Merrill Lynch Investment Management, MLIM in 2006 and bought Seattle based Quellos Group's Fund of hedge funds business in 2007 bringing the total value of assets under BlackRock Management to over $1,000,000,000,000. But it was the global financial crisis of 2007, 2008 that catapulted BlackRock to its current position of financial dominance. Just ask Heikki Buchter, the German correspondent who literally wrote the book on BlackRock. Prior to the financial crisis, I was not even familiar with the name, but in the years after the Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008, BlackRock appeared everywhere. Everywhere. Booker told German news outlet, DW in 2015. Even before the Bear Stearns Fiasco materialized into the Lehman Brothers collapse And the full on financial bloodbath of September 2008, Wall Street was collectively turning to BlackRock for help. AIG, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had all hired the firm to comb through their spiraling massive credit obligations in the months before the meltdown. BlackRock was perceived to be the only firm that could sort through the dizzying math behind the complicated debt swaps and exotic financial instruments Underlying the tottering financial system and many Wall Street kingpins had synced on speed dialed as panic began to grip the markets. I think of it like ghostbusters. When you have a problem who you gonna call? BlackRock. UBS managing Doctor Terence Keely told CNN at the time. And why wouldn't they trust think to pick through the mess of the subprime mortgage meltdown? After all He was the one who helped launch the whole toxic subprime mortgage industry in the 1st place. Oh, did I forget to mention that? Remember the whole losing his job because he lost $100,000,000 for First Boston in 1986 thing? That came just 3 years after Fink had made 1,000,000,000 for the bank's customers by constructing his 1st collateralized mortgage Obligation, CMO, and almost single handedly created the subprime mortgage market that would fail so spectacularly in 2008. Speaker 2: Started First Boss in 1976. I was the 1st Freddie Mac bond trader. And so the mortgage market was just If it's infancy and then in 1982, we had the ability to put a PC on our trading desk. Before that you had no ability to put a Computer on the trading desk. And it was very clear to me that if we could have computing power on the trading desk, we were gonna have the ability To dissect cash flows of mortgages that led in 1983 to the first carving up A mortgage into different tranches and so we created the 1st CMO. Speaker 0: So depending how you look at it, Fink was either the perfect guy to have in charge of sorting out the mess that his CMO monstrosity had created or the 1st Fink who should have gone to jail for it. Guess which way the US government chose to see it? Yeah, you guessed right. They saw Fink as their savior, of course. Specifically, The US government turned to BlackRock for help with beleaguered US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner personally consulting Larry Fink No less than 49 times over the course of the 18 month crisis. Lest there be any doubt who was calling the shots in that relationship, When Geithner was on the ropes and his position as Secretary of the Treasury was in jeopardy at the end of Obama's 1st term, Fink's name was on the shortlist of those who were being considered to replace him. The Federal Reserve too put its faith in BlackRock Turning to the company for assistance in administering the 2008 bailouts. Ultimately, BlackRock ended up playing a role in the $30,000,000,000 Financing of the sale of Bear Stearns to JPMorgan, the $180,000,000,000 bailout of AIG, and the $45,000,000,000 rescue of Citigroup. When the dust finally settled on Wall Street after the Lehman Brothers collapsed, there was little doubt who was sitting on top of the dust pile, BlackRock. The only question was how they would parlay their growing wealth and financial clout into real world political power. For Fink, the answer was obvious. Move from the petty crime of high finance into the criminal big leagues of government. Accordingly, throughout the last decade, he has spent his time building up BlackRock's political influence until it has become As even Bloomberg admits, the de facto 4th branch of government. When BlackRock executives managed to get their hands on a confidential The Federal Reserve PowerPoint presentation threatening to subject BlackRock to the same regulatory regime as the big banks. The Wall Street behemoth spent Millions successfully lobbying the government to drop the proposal. But lobbying the government is a roundabout way to get what you want. As any good financial guru will tell you, it's far more cost efficient to make sure that no troublesome regulations are imposed in the 1st place. Perhaps that's why Fink has been collecting powerful politicians for years now. Scooping them up as consultants, advisors, and board members so that he can ensure BlackRock has a key agent at the heart of any important political event. As William Ingalls details in his own Jose of BlackRock. BlackRock founder and CEO, Larry Fink is clearly interested in buying influence globally. He made former German CDU MP Friedrich Merck, Head of BlackRock Germany, when it looked as if he might succeed Chancellor Merkel and former British Chancellor of Exchequer George Osborne as a political consultant. Fink named former Hillary Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills to the BlackRock board when it seems certain Hillary would soon be in the White House. He has named former central bankers to his board and gone on to secure lucrative contracts with their former institutions. Stanley Fischer, Former head of the Bank of Israel and also later Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve is now senior advisor at BlackRock. Philip Hildebrand, former Swiss National Bank President is Vice Chairman at BlackRock where he oversees the BlackRock Investment Institute. Jean Boivin, the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, is the global head of research at BlackRock's Investment Institute. And it doesn't end there. When it came time for Biden's handlers to appoint the director of the National Economic Council, responsible for the coordination of policy making on both domestic and international economic issues. Naturally, they turn to Brian Deeds, the former Global Head of Sustainable Investing at BlackRock Inc. And the rest as they say is history. Or more accurately is the present. Because when we peel back the layers of propaganda from the 3 years, we find that the remarkable events of this have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the virus. We are instead witnessing a changeover in the monetary and economic system that was conceived, proposed, and then implemented by, You guessed it, BlackRock. Historians of the future will no doubt note 2019 is the year that BlackRock began its Take over of the planet in earnest. It was in January of that fateful year that Joe Biden crawled cap in hand to Larry Fink's Wall Street office to seek the financial titan's blessing for his presidential selection. I'm here to help, Fink reportedly replied. Then, on August 22, 2019, Larry Fink joined such illustrious figures as Owl Climate Con Man Gore, Kristia Account Freezing Freeland, Mark G. Fans Carney and the man himself, Klaus Bond villain Schwab, on the World Economic Forum's Board of Trustees, an organization which, The WEF informs us, serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum's mission and values. But which values are those precisely? You might ask. And what does Yo Yo Ma have to do with it? It was another event that took place on August 22, 2019, However, that captures our attention today. As it turns out, August 22nd was not only the date that Fink achieved his globalist knighthood on the WEF Board, It was also the date that the financial coup d'etat, later erroneously referred to as a pandemic, actually began. In order to understand what happened that day, however, we need to take a moment to understand the structure of the US monetary system. You see, greatly oversimplifying things for ease of understanding, there are actually 2 types of money in the banking system. There's bank money, the money that you and I use to transact in the real economy, and there's reserve money, the money that banks keep on deposit at the Federal Reserve. These 2 types of money circulate in 2 separate monetary circuits, sometimes referred to as the retail circuit bank money and the wholesale circuit reserve money. In order to get a handle on what this actually means, I highly suggest you check out John Titus's indispensable videos on the subject, notably, Mommy, where does money come from? And wherefore art thou reserves? And Larry and Karsten's excellent Pandemic, where he explains the Split Circuit Monetary System. Speaker 3: So here we have Split Circuit Monetary System and on the left We have the public circuit where I'm gonna simplify the diagram. It's the Federal Reserve is issuing money to commercial banks and it is Circling back to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve might buy an asset from a commercial bank, which turns around, sells it back to the Fed. That's a basic stripped down circuit. The retail circuit on the right, in red, the commercial banks are issuing money. Again, I'm going to simplify this. They issue money To you and me, they issue it in the formal ones, we pay the money back and the cycle begins anew, and that's really the system. I wanted to do this diagram though because you could see here, in the center of the diagram, the commercial banks occupy a special position in And the 2 tiered split circuit monetary system, they are both, issuers and users of money in the center here, so you could really Draw a box around them. Now you and I in the retail circuit, we keep our money on deposit at the commercial banks, Which in turn keep their money on deposit at the Fed. So there you have 2 different systems of deposits. Speaker 0: But the point of the 2 circuit system is that historically speaking, the Federal Reserve was never able to print money in the sense People usually understand that term. It's able to create reserve money, which banks can keep on deposit with the Fed to meet their capital requirements. The more reserves they have parked at the Fed, the more bank money they're allowed to conjure into existence and lend out into the real economy. The gap between Fed created reserve money and bank created bank money acts as a type of circuit breaker, and this is why the flood of reserve money that the Fed Created in the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008 did not result in a spike in commercial bank deposits, but all that changed 3 years ago. As Titus observes, by the time of the scandemic bailouts of 2020, the amount of bank money sitting in deposit in commercial banks in the US, a figure which had never shown any correlation with the total amount of reserves held on deposit at the Fed, suddenly spiked in lockstep with the Fed's climbing balance sheet. Clearly, something had happened between the 2008 bailout and the 2020 bailout. Whereas the tidal wave of reserve money unleashed to capitalize the banks in the earlier bailout hadn't found its way into the real economy, the 2020 bailout money had. So what happened? BlackRock happened, that's what. Specifically, On August 15, 2019, BlackRock published a report under the typically eye wateringly boring title Dealing with the next downturn from unconventional monetary policy to unprecedented policy coordination. Although the paper did not catch the attention of the general But it did generate some press in the financial media and much more to the point generated interest from the gaggle of central bankers who descended on Jackson Hole, Wyoming For the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium taking place on August 22, 2019. The exact Same day that Sinc was being appointed to the WEF's board. The theme of the 2019 Symposium, which brings together central bankers, policy makers, economists and academics to discuss economic issues and policy options was Challenges for monetary policy and BlackRock's paper published a week in advance of the event was carefully crafted to set the parameters of that discussion. It's no surprise that the report caught the attention of the central bankers. After all, BlackRock's proposal came with a pedigree. Of the 4 co authors of the report, 3 of them were former central bankers themselves. As we've seen, Philip Hildebrand, the former president of the Swiss National Bank. Stanley Fischer, the former Federal Reserve Vice Chairman and former Governor of the Bank of Israel, and Jean Boisvain, the former Deputy Governor of the Bank of Canada. But beyond the paper's authorship, It was what dealing with the next downturn actually proposed that was to have such earth shaking effects on the global monetary order. The report starts by noting the dilemma that the central bankers found themselves in by 2019. After years of quantitative easing QE and zerp Zero interest rate policy and even the once unthinkable NERP negative interest rate policy, the banksters were running out of room to operate. As BlackRock notes, The current policy space for global central banks is limited and will not be enough to respond to a significant, let alone a dramatic downturn. Conventional and unconventional monetary policy works primarily through the stimulative impact of lower short term and long term interest rates. This channel is almost tapped out. 1 third of the developed market government bond and investment grade universe now has negative yields and global bond yields are closing in on their potential floor. Further support cannot rely on interest rates falling. So what was BlackRock's answer to this conundrum? Why a great reset of course. No, not Klaus Schwab's great reset a different type of great reset the going direct Reset. An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough. That response will likely involve Going direct. Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders. Going direct, which can be organized in a variety of different ways works by 1, bypassing the interest rate channel when this traditional central bank toolkit is exhausted, and 2, enforcing policy coordination so that the fiscal expansion does not lead to an offsetting increase in interest rates. The authors of BlackRock's proposal go on to stress that they're not talking about simply dumping money into people's bank accounts willy nilly. As report co author Philip Hildebrand made sure to stress in his appearance on Bloomberg on the day of the papers release, this was not Bernanke's helicopter money idea. Speaker 4: So what we're proposing is the next step has to be something else than just more of the same, something that Goes into the direction of essentially what we call going direct, which would be ways of putting money into into pockets of consumers or corporates directly order to spend. So to go around the interest rate channel as opposed to traditional central banking where you really only, always work through the interest rate channel. Speaker 5: So kind Like helicopter money, does it have to be coordinated? Speaker 4: I think what what it means, helicopter money is a sort of catchphrase from the famous paper that Ben Bernanke gave in in the early 2000s, but the point is, Yes. You have to go in a different way than working through the interest rate channel because interest rates are already so low. Speaker 0: Nor was it, as report co author Jean Boivin was keen to stress in his January 2020 appearance on BlackRock's own podcast, discussing the idea, a version of Modern Monetary Theory, MMT, with the government simply printing up bank money to spend directly into the economy. No. This was to be a process where special purpose facilities, which they called Standing Emergency Fiscal Facilities, S E F F, would be created to inject bank money directly into the commercial accounts of various public or private sector entities. These SEFFs S would be overseen by the central bankers themselves thus crossing the streams of the 2 monetary circuits in a way that had never been done before. Any additional measures to stimulate economic growth will have to go beyond the interest rate channel and go direct with the central bank crediting private or public sector accounts directly with money. One way or another, this will mean subsidizing spending, and such a measure would be fiscal rather than monetary by design. This can be done directly through fiscal policy or by expanding the Monetary Policy Toolkit with an instrument that will be fiscal in nature such as credit easing by way of buying equities. This implies that an effective stimulus would require coordination between monetary and fiscal policy be it implicitly or explicitly. Alright. Let's recap. On August 15, 2019, BlackRock came out with a proposal calling for central banks to adopt a completely unprecedented procedure for injecting money directly into the economy in the event of the next downturn. Then on August 22, 2019, the Central Bankers of the World convened in Wyoming for their annual shindig to discuss these very ideas. So did the central bankers listen to BlackRock? You bet they did. Remember when we saw how commercial bank Deposits began moving in sync with the Fed's balance sheet for the first time ever. Let's take another look at that, shall we? It wasn't the March 2020 bailouts where the correlation between the Fed balance sheet and commercial bank deposits, the telltale Sign of a BlackRock style going direct bailout began. It was actually in September 2019, months before this gandemic was a gleam in Bill Gates's eye When we started to see Federal Reserve Monetary Creation finding its way directly into the retail monetary circuit. In other words it was less than 1 month after BlackRock proposed this revolutionary new type of fiscal intervention that the central banks began implementing that very idea. The Going Direct Reset, better understood as a financial coup d'etat, had begun. To be sure, this going direct intervention was later offset by the Fed's next scam for forcing more government debt on depositors, but that's another story. The point is that the seal had been broken on the going direct bottle and it wasn't long before the central bankers had a perfect excuse for forcing that entire bottle down the public's throat. What we were told was a pandemic was in fact on the financial level, just an excuse for an absolutely Accidented pumping of 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars from the Fed directly into the economy. The story of precisely how the Going Direct reset was implemented during the 2020 bailouts is a fascinating one and I would encourage you to dive down that rabbit hole if you're interested. But for today's purposes, It's sufficient to understand what the central bankers got out of the going direct reset. The ability to take over fiscal policy and to begin engineering the economy of Main Street in a more, Well, direct way. But what did BlackRock get out of this you ask? Well, When it came time to decide who to call in to manage this scandemic bailout scheme, guess who the Fed turned to? If you guessed BlackRock, Then sadly, you're exactly right. Yes, in March 2020, the Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage Three separate bailout programs. It's commercial mortgage backed securities program, it's purchases of newly issued corporate bonds, and it's purchases of existing investment grade bonds and credit ETFs. To be sure, this bailout bonanza wasn't just another excuse for BlackRock to gain access The government purse and distribute funds to businesses in its own portfolio, though it certainly was that. And it wasn't just another emergency where the Chairman of the Federal Reserve had to put Larry Fink on speed dial not simply to shower BlackRock with no bid contracts, but to manage his own portfolio. Although it certainly was that too. It was also a convenient excuse for BlackRock to bail out one of its own most valuable assets. Ishares. The collection of exchange traded funds, ETFs, that it acquired from Barclays for $13,500,000,000 In 2009, and that had ballooned to a $1,900,000,000,000 Juggernaut by 2020. As Pam and Russ Martins, Who've been on the BlackRock beat at their Wall Street on Parade blog for years now detailed in their article on the subject, BlackRock is bailing out its ETFs with Fed money and taxpayers eating losses. BlackRock is being allowed by the Fed to buy its own corporate bond ETFs as part of a Fed program to prop up the corporate bond market. According to a report in Institutional Investor on Monday, BlackRock, on behalf of the Fed, bought $1,580,000,000 in investment grade and high yield ETFs from May 12th to May 19th, With BlackRock's iShares funds representing 48% of the $1,307,000,000 market value at the end of that period, ETFGI said in a May 30th report. No bid contracts and buying up your own products? What could possibly be wrong with that? The numbers speak for themselves After BlackRock was allowed to bail out its own ETF Funds with the Fed's newly minted going direct funny money, iShares surged yet again, surpassing $3,000,000,000,000 in assets under management last year. But it wasn't just the Fed that was rolling out the red carpet for BlackRock to implement the very bailout plan that BlackRock created. Banksters from around the world were positively falling over themselves to get BlackRock to manage their market interventions. In April 2020, the Bank of Canada announced that it was hiring, who else? BlackRock's Financial Markets Advisory, FMA, to help manage his own $10,000,000,000 corporate bond buying program. Then in May 2020, the Swedish central bank, the Riksbank, Also hired BlackRock has an external consultant to conduct an analysis of the Swedish corporate bonds market and an assessment of possible design options for a potential corporate bonds asset purchase program. As we saw earlier, the global financial crisis had put BlackRock on the map Establishing the firm's dominance on the world stage and catapulting Larry Fink to the status of Wall Street royalty. With the 2020 going direct reset however, BlackRock had truly conquered the world. It was now dictating central bank interventions and then acting in every conceivable role and in direct violation of conflict of interest rules, acting as consultant and advisor, as manager, as buyer, as seller, and as investor with both the Fed and the very banks, corporations, pension funds, and other entities it was bailing out. Yes with the advent of the scandemic BlackRock had cemented its position as the company that owns the world but yet again we are left with the same nagging question What is BlackRock seeking to do with this power? What is it capable of doing? And what are the aims of Fink and his fellow travelers? Let's find out. As you now know, BlackRock started out life as Blackstone Financial Management in the offices of the Blackstone Group in 1988. By 1992, it was already so successful that founder Larry Fink and Blackstone CEO, Steven Schwartzman, spun fund the company off as its own entity, christening it BlackRock in a deliberate attempt to sow confusion. But it was in 1993, or so the story goes that arguably the most important of BlackRock's market controlling tools was forged. It was that year that Jody Kochanski, a fixed income portfolio manager, hired the year before, began to tire of his daily 6:30 am task of comparing his entire portfolio to yesterday's numbers. The task, Done by hand from paper printouts was long and arduous. Kochanski had a better idea. We said, let's take this data and rather than Print it out. Let's sort it into a database and have the computer compare the report today versus the report yesterday across every position. It may seem obvious to us today, but in 1993, the idea of automating a task like this was a radical one. Nonetheless, it paid off. After seeing the utility of having an automated, daily, computer generated report, calculating the risk on every asset in a portfolio, Kochanski and his team hunkered down for a 72 hour code writing exercise that resulted in ALADN, short for asset, Liability, debt, and derivative investment network, a proprietary investment analysis technology touted as the operating system for BlackRock. Sold as a central processing system for investment management, the software is now the core of BlackRock Solutions. A BlackRock subsidiary that licenses Aladdin to corporate clients institutional investors. Aladdin combines portfolio management and trading, compliance, operations, and risk oversight in a single platform and is now used by Over 200 institutions including fund manager rivals Vanguard and State Street, half of the top 10 insurers in the world, big tech giants like Microsoft, Apple and Alphabet bet, and numerous pension funds including the world's largest, the $1,500,000,000,000 Japanese Government Pension Insurance Fund. The numbers themselves tell the story of Aladdin. It's used by 13,000 BlackRock employees and thousands of BlackRock customers. It occupies It's 3 data centers in the US with BlackRock planning to open 2 more in Europe. It runs thousands of Monte Carlo simulations, computational Algorithms that model the probability of various outcomes in chaotic systems everyday on each one of the tens of millions of securities under its purview. And by February 2017, Aladdin was managing risk for $20,000,000,000,000 worth of assets. That's when BlackRock Stop reporting this figure since as the company told the Financial Times, total assets do not reflect how clients use the system. An anonymous source in the company had a for take. The figure is no longer disclosed because of the negative attention the enormous sums attracted. In this case, the phrase enormous sums Almost fails to do justice to the truly mind boggling wealth under the watchful eye of this computer system. As the Financial Times went on to report the combination of the scores of new clients using Aladdin in recent years and the growth in stock and bond markets in that time has meant that the total of assets under the systems management is much larger than the $20,000,000,000,000 reported in 2017. Today, $21,600,000,000,000 sits on platform from just a third of its 240 clients according to public documents verified with the companies and first hand accounts. For context, X. That figure representing the assets of just 1 third of BlackRock's clientele itself accounts for 10% of the value of all the stocks and bonds in the world. But if the idea of this amount of the world's assets being under the management of a single company's Proprietary computer software concerns you, BlackRock has a message for you. Relax. The official line is that Aladdin only calculates risk. It doesn't tell asset managers what to buy or sell. Thus, even if there were a stray line of code or a wonky algorithm somewhere deep inside Aladdin's programming, getting its investment analysis catastrophically wrong, the final decision on any given instrument would still down to human judgment. Needless to say, that's a lie. In 2017, BlackRock unveiled a project to replace underperforming human stock pickers with computer algorithms. Subbed Monarch, the scheme saw 1,000,000,000 of dollars of assets snatched from human control and into an obscure arm of the BlackRock Empire called Systematic Active Equities SAE. BlackRock acquired SAE in the same 2009 deal that saw it snag I shares from Barclays global investor BGI. As we've already seen, the BGI deal was unbelievably Probably lucrative for BlackRock with I shares being purchased for $13,500,000,000 in 2009 and rising to a $1,900,000,000,000 valuation in 2020. Testifying to BlackRock's commitment to the Machine Over Man Monarch project, Mark Wiseman, Global Head of Active Equities at BlackRock Told the Financial Times in 2018, I firmly believe that if we look back in 5 to 10 years from now, the thing that we most benefited from in the BGI acquisition is actually SAE. Even the New York Times was reporting at the time of the launch of the Monarch Operation that Larry Fink had quote tasked his lot with the machines and that BlackRock had quote laid out an ambitious plan to consolidate a large number of Actively managed mutual funds with peers that rely more on algorithms and models to pick stocks. The democratization of information has made it much harder for active management, Fink told the New York Times. We have to change the ecosystem. That means relying more on big data artificial intelligence Factors and models within quant and traditional investment strategies. Lest there be any doubt about BlackRock's commitment to this anti human agenda, The company doubled down in 2018 with the creation of AI Labs, which is quote, composed of researchers, data scientists, and engineers, and works to quote, develop methods to solve their hardest technical problems and advance the fields of finance and AI. The actual models that SAE uses to pick stocks is hidden behind walls of corporate secrecy, but we do know some details. We know for instance that SAE collects over 1,000 market signals on each stock under evaluation, including everything from the obvious Statistics you would expect in any quantitative analysis of the equities markets, trading price, volume, price to earnings ratio, etcetera, to the more exotic forms of data harvesting that are possible when complex learning algorithms are connected to the mind boggling amounts of data now available on seemingly everyone and everything. A Harvard MBA student catalogued some of these novel approaches to stock valuation undertaken by the SAE algorithms in a 2018 post on the subject. One of the ways BlackRock is including machine learning in its investment This is by signal combination in which a model minds data attempting to learn the relationship between stock returns and various quantitative data. For example, It would analyze web traffic through corporate websites as an indicator of future growth of the company, or would look at the geolocation data from smartphones to predict which Tailoreds are more popular. In doing so researchers must recalibrate and refine the model to make sure it was adding value and not just rediscovering well known market behaviors already known by fundamental fund managers. Another important machine learning Location came when it was combined with natural language processing. In this model, the technology learns in an adaptive way. What are the words that can predict future performance of stocks. This model was used on analysis of broker reports and corporate filings and the technology discovered that CEO's remarks Tend to be generally more positive, so then it started giving more importance to the comments of the CFO, or the Q and A portion of conference calls. So, So let's recap. We know that BlackRock now manages well in excess of $21,000,000,000,000 of That's with its Aladdin software making a significant portion of the world's wealth dependent on the calculations of an opaque proprietary BlackRock operating system. And we know that Fink has cast his lot in with the machines, and is increasingly devoted to finding ways to leverage so called old artificial intelligence, learning algorithms, and other state of the art technologies to further remove humans from the investment loop. But here's the real question, What is BlackRock actually doing with its all seeing eye of Aladdin and its SAE robo stock pickers and its AI labs? Where are Fink and the gang actually trying to take us with the latest and greatest in cutting edge Fintech wizardry. Luckily, we don't exactly need to scribe the tea leaves to find our answer to that question. Larry Fink has been kind enough to write it down for us in black and white. You see, every year since 2012, Fink has taken it upon himself as de facto ruler of the world's wealth to pen an annual letter to CEOs laying out the next steps in his scheme for world domination. I mean he writes the letter as quote, A fiduciary for our clients to entrust us to manage their assets. To highlight the themes that I believe are vital to driving durable long term returns and to helping them reach their goals. Sometimes referred to as a call to action to corporate leaders, these letters from the man stewarding over a significant chunk of the world's investable assets actually do change corporate behavior. That this is so should be self evident to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together, which is precisely why it took a team of researchers Months of painstaking study to publish a peer reviewed paper concluding this blindingly obvious fact. Portfolio firms are responsive to BlackRock's Public engagement efforts. You don't say. So, what is Larry Fink's latest hobby horse do you ask? Why, the ESG Damn, of course. That's right, Fink used his 2022 letter to harangue his captive audience for corporate chieftains about The Power of Capitalism. By which he means the power of capitalism to more perfectly control human behavior in the name of sustainability. Specifically, it's been 2 years since I The climate risk is investment risk and in that short period, we have seen a tectonic shift of capital. Sustainable investments have now reached $4,000,000,000,000. Actions and ambitions towards decarbonization have also increased. This is just the beginning. The tectonic shift towards Sustainable investing is still accelerating. Whether it is capital being deployed into new ventures focused on energy innovation or capital transferring from traditional indexes Into more customized portfolios and products, we will see more money in motion. Every company and every industry will be Swarmed by the transition to a net zero world. The question is, will you lead or will you be led? Oh. Oh. I want a lead Larry. Pick me. Pick me. But please tell me how I can lead my company into this brave new net zero world Hold order. Stakeholder capitalism is all about delivering long term durable returns for shareholders and transparency around your company's Planning for a net zero world is an important element of that, but it's just one of many disclosures we and other investors ask companies to make. As stewards of our clients' capital, we ask businesses to demonstrate how they're going to deliver on their responsibility to shareholders, including through sound environmental, social, and governance practices and policies. Yes, to the surprise Of absolutely no one, Larry Fink assigned BlackRock on to the multi $1,000,000,000,000 scam that is environmental, social and governance practices and policies better known as ESG. For those who don't know about ESG yet, they might want to get up to speed on the topic with my presentation earlier this year on ESG and the Big Oil Or they can read the summary of the ESG scam by Ian Davis in his article on the globalization of the commons, AKA the financialization of nature through so called natural asset corporations. This will be achieved using stakeholder capitalism metrics. Assets will be rated using ESG benchmarks for sustainable business performance. Any business requiring market finance, perhaps through issuing climate Bonds or maybe green bonds for European ventures, we'll need those bonds to have a healthy ESG rating. A low ESG rating We'll deter investors, preventing a project or business venture from getting off the ground. A high ESG rating will see investors rush to put their money in projects that are backed by international In combination, financial initiatives like NAC's and ESG's are converting SBG's into market regulations. In other words, ESG is a set of phony baloney metrics that are being cooked up by globalist think tanks and would be ruling councils like the World Economic Forum to serve as a type of social credit system for corporations. If corporations fail to toe the line when it comes to globalist policies of the moment, Whether that's committing to industry destroying net zero or even absolute zero commitments, or de banking thought criminals, or anything else that may be on the Globalist Their ESG rating will take a hit. So what? You may ask. What does an ESG rating have to do with price of tea in China and why would any CEO care? The so what here is that as Fink signals in his latest letter, BlackRock will be putting ESG reporting and compliance in its basket of considerations when choosing which stocks and bonds to invest in, and which ones to Pass over. And Fink is not alone. There are now 291 signatories to the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, an international group of asset Managers committed to supporting the goal of Net 0 Greenhouse Gas emissions by 2050 or sooner. They include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and the slew of other companies collectively managing $66,000,000,000,000 of assets. In plain Plain English, BlackRock and its fellow globalist investment firms are leveraging their power as asset managers to begin shaping the corporate world in their Image and bending corporations to their will. And in case you were wondering, yes, this is tied into the AI agenda And as well. In 2020, BlackRock announced the launch of a new module to its automated Aladdin system. Aladdin Climate. Aladdin Climate is the 1st software application to offer investors measures of both the physical risk of climate change and the transition risk to a low carbon economy on portfolios with climate adjusted security valuations and risk metrics. Using Aladdin Climate, investors can now analyze climate risk and opportunities the security level, and measure the impact of policy changes, technology, and energy supply on specific investments. To get a sense of what a world directed by digital overlords at the behest of the ESG agenda might look like, we simply need to turn to the ongoing conflict Ukraine. As Fink wrote in his letter to shareholders earlier this year, finally, a less discussed aspect of the war is its potential impact on accelerating digital currencies. The war will prompt countries Creating digital currencies. The war will prompt countries to reevaluate their currency dependencies. Even before the war, Several governments were looking to play a more active role in digital currencies and define the regulatory frameworks under which they operate. The US Central Bank, for example, recently launched a study to examine the potential implications of a US digital dollar. A global digital payment system, Thoughtfully designed can enhance the settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption. Digital currencies can also help bring down costs of cross border payments. For example, when expatriate workers send earnings back to their families. As we see increasing interest from our clients, BlackRock is studying digital currencies, stable coins, and the underlying technologies to understand how they can help us serve our clients. The future of the world according to BlackRock is now coming fully into view. It is a world in which unaccountable computer learning algorithms automatically direct investments of the world's largest institutions into the coffers of those who play ball with the demands of Fink and his fellow travelers. It's a world in which transactions will be increasingly digital, With every transaction being data mined for the financial benefits of the algorithmic overlords at BlackRock, and it's a world in which corporations that refuse to go along with The agenda will be ESG D ranked into oblivion and individuals who present resistance will have their CBDC wallets shut off. The transition of BlackRock from a mere investment firm into a financial, political, and technological colossus that has the power to direct the course of human civilization is almost complete. Speaker 3: Meet Serge Varley, a recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 1: Let me tell you, doctor who's the Speaker 0: person next. Speaker 1: Who's controlling the the wallet? Next, sir. Sorry. It's it's Speaker 5: Then who's that? Speaker 1: The hedge funds across Speaker 0: the banks. Speaker 1: Stop. They've got the bank. Campaign financing. Yep. You can buy your candidates. Obviously, we have a business in place. 1st, there's a business. And you guys you got $10 you can buy. I can give you 500 k right now, no question asked. Speaker 5: Yeah. I Speaker 1: don't know if you get this to be done. Speaker 5: Just like, everybody do that? Does Blackhawk do that? It's like, you know It Speaker 0: As bleak as the exploration of this world conquering juggernaut is, there is a ray of hope on the horizon. The public is at least finally becoming aware of the existence of BlackRock and its relative importance on the global financial stage. This is reflected in an increasing number of protests targeting BlackRock and its activities. Speaker 5: $10,000,000,000,000. If that were a country, that country's GDP would be larger than any other country's GDP Which is killing us and killing our losers. Speaker 0: Keen eyed observers may note, however, that these protests are not against the BlackRock agenda that I've been laying out here. On the contrary, they are for that agenda. These protesters' main gripe seems to be that Fink and BlackRock are engaged in greenwashing and that the mega corporation is Truly more interested in its bottom line than in saving mother earth. Well, duh. Even BlackRock's Former Chief Investment Officer for Sustainable Investing wrote, after leaving the firm, an extensive 4 part whistleblowing expose documenting how the sustainable investing push being touted by Think is a scam from top to bottom. My only gripe with this limited hangout critique of BlackRock is that it implies that Fink and his cohorts are merely interested in accumulating dollars. They're not. They're interested in turning their financial wealth into real world power. Power they will wield in service of their own agenda, and will cloak with a phony green mantle because they believe, and not without reason, but that's what the public wants. Slightly closer to the point you get non profit groups like Consumers Research Slamming BlackRock for impoverishing the real economy for the benefit of itself and its clients. You'd think a company that has made it their mission to force ESG standards on American businesses would apply those same standards to foreign investments, but BlackRock isn't pushing its woke agenda on China or Russia. Consumers Research Executive Director, Will Hilde explained last year after the launch of an ad campaign targeting the investment giant. But that critique too seems to miss the underlying point. Is Hill trying to say that if only Fink applied his economy destroying standards equally across the board, Then he'd be beyond reproach. More hopefully, there are signs that the political class always willing to jump out in front of a parade and pretend they're leading it, are picking up on the growing public discontent with BlackRock and are beginning to cut ties with the firm. In the past several months, Multiple US state governments have announced their intention to divest state funds from BlackRock, with 19 states attorneys general even signing a letter to Larry Think in August of 2022 calling him out on his agenda of social control. BlackRock's Actions on a variety of governance objectives may violate multiple state laws. Mister McComb's letter asserts compliance with our fiduciary laws because BlackRock has a private motivation that differs from its public commitments and statements. This is likely insufficient to satisfy state laws requiring a sole focus on financial return. Our states will not idly stand for our pensioners' retirements to be sacrificed for BlackRock's climate agenda. The time has come for BlackRock to come clean on whether it actually values our state's most valuable stakeholders, our current and future retirees. As part of this divestment push, the Louisiana state treasurer announced in October that the state was withdrawing $794,000,000 in state funds from BlackRock. South Carolina's state treasurer announced plans to divest 200,000,000 from the company's control by the end of the year. And Arkansas has already taken $125,000,000 out of money market accounts under BlackRock's management. Regardless of the real motivations of these state governments, The fact that they feel compelled to take action against BlackRock is itself a hopeful sign. It means that the political class understands that an increasing portion of the public is aware of the BlackRock ESG corporate governance agenda and is opposed to it. It's already having some effect, with Fink recently conceding that he would bow to the pressure and drop explicit promotion of ESG scores, while continuing to push the ESG agenda and everything it stands for naturally. Once again, we arrive at the bottom line. The only thing that truly matters is public awareness of the issues involved in the rise of a financial, and political, and Technological giant like BlackRock, and it is only general public opinion that can move the needle when it comes to removing the wealth, and thus the power from a behemoth like the one that Fink has created. But before we wrap up here there's 1 last point to be made. You might remember that we opened this exploration by highlighting BlackRock's position as one of the top institutional shareholders in Walmart, And in Coca Cola. And in Moderna. And in Exxon. And in Amazon. And in seemingly every other company of significance on the global stage. Now, the fact checkers will tell you this doesn't Actually matter because it's the shareholders who actually own the stock, not BlackRock itself. But that raises a further question. Who owns BlackRock? Oh, of course. Now, I realize this is a lot of information to take in at once. Go ahead and re watch this video once or twice. Follow some of the many links contained herein to better familiarize yourself with this material. Share these reports with others. But if after taking all of this in you find yourself looking back over these Top Institutional Folders List and saying, You wait, who's the Vanguard Group? Well then, I'd say you're starting to get it. Good job. So who is the Vanguard Group? It's an excellent question And one that I'll be answering in the next edition of the Corporate Report Subscriber Newsletter. I hope you're there for the answer. Alright, enough green screen tomfoolery. This is James Corbett of corbettreport.com, the creator, writer, Director, producer of the How Black Rock Conquered the World documentary that you've just been enjoying. And if you have made it this far, then congratulations. You are now better informed on this subject The 99% of the public. So with that great power comes the great responsibility of sharing this information with others. So I ask If you did get anything out of today's presentation that you do share it with people, that you know in your life, because I think it is Awareness of this information that is incredibly important, the incredibly important part of solving the problem of BlackRock, and if you are interested in that question of solving the problem of BlackRock, boy have I got more material for you. Yes, coming up on my next edition of Solutions Watch, my regular weekly series where I'm looking at solutions to the problems that are often posed in the independent media but rarely solved. I'm going to talk about the problem of BlackRock and how we can go about contributing to its Solution. So there's more on that coming shortly from corporatereport.com, but if this is your first time enjoying a Corporate Report presentation, Then let me inform you that there's even better news in your information dissemination task that I've just given you. I have made it as easy as possible for you to get this information out to others, specifically by making not just this video And not just the audio download, but a complete hyperlinked transcript with a source of every single thing that I've talked about In today's presentation, completely available for free at corbettreport.com/blackrock. You go there and you will find the audiovideo downloads and a Complete hyperlink transcript of this entire documentary. So I hope that is useful for you, and if it is please do help spread this to others. Now, As you may or may not have noticed, if you are a Corporate Report subscriber, you may have noticed that this entire documentary is almost entirely based on an editorial series that I released in the Corporate Report Subscriber Newsletter last November. So if you are a Corporate Report subscriber, you will be way ahead of this curve. You are always ahead of the game, so, Corbit Reports subscribers, give yourself a pat on the back and please help me get this information out to others. If you are not a Corbit Support subscriber and would like access, early access as it were, to my next documentaries and things that I'm working on. Well, you can do so. First of all, the newsletter contains an editorial which is available for free all the time as with all of my work. So if you want to just sign up for the free email list and get informed every time I post anything including an editorial, then you can go to corbettreport. Substack.com. But if you would like to become a Corporate Report member and to actually contribute to this work and help keep it coming, Then I would sincerely appreciate you taking the time and effort and expense to sign up for a Corporate Report membership. As little as $12 a year, $1 a month, you can help keep this independent media going and growing. And I do appreciate that. So That information is available at corporatereport.com/members. When you sign up, you'll get logged in for the website so that you can log in and see the full Newsletter that is delivered every weekend that includes not just the editorial, but also recommended reading and viewing, a discount for material at the New World Next Week store, etcetera. Anyway, that's a lot of information to go through. The links, of course, will be at the end of this transcript. And I thank you again for your time and attention, and thank you in advance for helping us spread this word to others.
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 4:16 PM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

BlackRock will soon own everything, then they’ll use their leverage to force the World Economic Forum’s 2030 agenda…. “You’ll own nothing, and you’ll be happy”..

Video Transcript AI Summary
At BlackRock, we are emphasizing the need for companies to change their behaviors as an investment criteria. We are actively pushing for these changes and although it will take time, we are surprised by the lack of opportunities we have seen so far.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You now make a point of that's an investment criteria for you. Well, behaviors are going to have to change and this is one thing we're asking companies. You have to force behaviors and at BlackRock we are forcing behaviors and ultimately it's still going to take time But I am just as much shocked and is that we have not seen more opportunities. We're going to have to force
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 4:43 AM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

The Commander in Chief is not who we think it is… it’s the CEO of BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard They control the Military Arms Complex and Department of Defence… Larry Fink, BlackRock.. Jewish Ron O'Hanley, State Street… Jewish Mortimer Buckley, Vanguard… Jewish https://t.co/jCEqFznDsR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The three largest shareholders of 88% of S&P 500 companies are BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. These companies hold significant power and influence over CEOs, who must answer their calls and hire according to their preferences. The same goes for companies in the Department of Defense, where State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock are three out of the top four shareholders in most of these companies. This suggests that the CEOs of these investment firms hold more power than we may realize, making them the de facto commanders in chief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They are the largest shareholder themselves like Larry Fink is BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. These 3 companies are the largest shareholders of 88% of S and P 500 companies. Let me say that one more time. You got 500 companies, S and P 500. 88 percent of those companies. Their largest shareholder of those companies is either State Street, Vanguard, or BlackRock. So whose phone call do you think you have to pick up when they call you? Black BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. Who do you fear if you're the CEO of those companies? State Street, Vanguard, BlackRock. You better answer those calls. Who are you gonna hire? You're gonna have to hire whoever they're gonna want you to hire because you want the high score. So now, let's go to other industries, Department of Defense, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boink, Northrop Grumman. 3 out of the 4 top shareholders in almost every one of those companies. Guess which companies they are? State Street, Vanguard, BlackRock. So the commander in chief is not who we think it is. It's the CEO of BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street.
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 9:15 PM

@HappyCamper2626 - I’m No Angel

@liz_churchill10 Most people know what /who Blackrock is. But , do you know how powerful they are? Here’s a quick little education on Blackrock. Very scary just how powerful they have become. https://t.co/5tItklUswv

Video Transcript AI Summary
A senior adviser to BlackRock revealed that a group of elites, including leaders from major financial institutions and central banks, are working towards establishing a one-world order, one-world taxation, and one-world money. They plan to freeze the global financial system during an upcoming crisis and reset the world economy according to their vision. BlackRock is targeted to be classified as "too big to fail," allowing the elites to take control of its assets remotely. The elites, who are not democratically elected, include individuals such as Christine Lagarde, Mark Carney, and Ben Bernanke. The elites have conducted dry runs in countries like Cyprus, freezing entire banking systems and extracting wealth from citizens. This coordinated attack on the global financial system will have severe consequences for citizens worldwide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was having dinner with a friend not long ago in New York City. We met at a place called Ariel, which is in Midtown. My dinner companion that night was a senior adviser to BlackRock. As you may know, BlackRock is now the largest asset manager on the planet. It directly manages $5,000,000,000,000 in assets, and it oversees another $11,000,000,000,000 through its Aladdin platform. That means 1 firm controls more money than the GDPs of China, Russia, and Japan combined. Anyway, my dinner companion happens to work directly for BlackRock CEO. As we nourished our white wine and the evening wore on, she let something slip. If I remember her words, she said something like, they want to tell us we can't sell. What was she talking about? Who was she talking about? I placed a few calls, first to my contacts in Washington, then to a few people on Wall Street. Soon, I was on a plane for a series of meetings to London, to Geneva, back to New York then down to South America. As I began connecting the dots, a pattern emerged. It revealed a network of more than 189 individuals positioned inside the world's major financial institutions. Some of them hold senior positions inside the IMF, World Bank, and every central bank in the g twenty, including our own Federal Reserve. These elites share one vision, and they're about to make it a reality. That vision is one world order, One World Taxation and One World Money. They've worked for years behind the scenes preparing to realize that vision. They've literally rigged the laws of international Finance. Everything is basically in place right now, and there's essentially no way to stop this from happening. When the crisis hits, they'll flip the switch, freezing the global financial system. That will give them time to reset the world economy according to their vision. As the coming crisis unfolds, president Trump will be powerless to stop it. In In fact, trying to stop them would probably weaken the president's power altogether. Speaker 1: That is that that that is amazing, Jim. Really. So what did these elites want from your contact at BlackRock? Speaker 0: Basically, they want to classify BlackRock as too big to fail. The technical term is systemically important financial institution or SIFI. That designation normally applies to banks such as Bank of America. If your bank gets the SIFI label, it means the government will bail you out first in a crisis, but it also means you must turn over control of your bank until the crisis subsides. In this case, they're trying to reclassify BlackRock, an asset manager, as too big to fail. If they succeed, they'll be able to freeze BlackRock when the crisis hits. BlackRock clients won't be able to sell. They won't be able to buy either. Their accounts will go dark indefinitely, and the elite operators will take control of BlackRock's assets remotely via the Internet. But our research shows that their ICE nine plan goes much, much deeper than that. Speaker 1: That you refer to their plan as ICE nine. You just said that. What what does that mean? Speaker 0: It's a reference to the Kurt Vonnegut novel, Cat's Cradle. In the book, a mad scientist creates a new form of water molecule called ice 9. When it comes in contact with other water molecules, it freezes them at room temperature. One job of Einstein can freeze the whole ocean, and that's what these elite operators are about to do Speaker 1: to the world economy. Now can you share with our viewers exactly who these operatives are and and what their ultimate goal might be? Speaker 0: Like I said, John, more than 189 elite agents have slowly wormed their way into leadership positions across the board. They now sit at or near the head of the IMF, the World Bank, and even our own Federal Reserve. They also control much of what happens at the central banks of China, Russia, India, Brazil, Canada, and Europe. As you know, these institutions form a kind of global superstructure. It forms a kind of snare net encircling all nations. Their leaders aren't democratically elected. They're not accountable to you and me. They're beyond the reach of government and citizens, and yet they hold the fate of the global financial system in their hands. To get a sense of how they Trade. Imagine an array of floating spheres. 1 sphere is labeled IMF, 1 is labeled Fed, 1 is labeled Bilderberg, 1 is labeled Wall Street, One is labeled central banks, one is labeled intelligence agencies, one is labeled media, and so on. The elites inhabit all of these spheres, and together, the network forms a kind of 3 d Venn diagram. As I see it, regardless of what sphere they inhabit, the elites all share the same vision, One world order, one world taxation, and one world money. All of their actions are geared toward moving that agenda forward. Now are you able to share the identities of these elites with our viewers? We've identified more than 189 individuals who are in many cases hiding in plain sight. Regardless, they all share the same vision, one world order, one world taxation, and one world money. A shortlist would include Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, IMF, Mark Carney, governor of the Bank of England, Raghuram ji Rajan, vice chairman of a bank for international settlements, Haruhiko Kuroda, governor of the Bank of Japan, William c Dudley, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Agustin Costens, governor of the Bank of Mexico, Janet Yellen, chairman of the board of the Federal Reserve System, Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank, Zhilin, former deputy managing director of the IMF, Zhejiang, governor of the People's Bank of China, Robert e Rubin, chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. This a list of central bankers and other elites is just the tip of the iceberg. Of course, not one of these elites will tell you outright what's going on, but I've seen and heard enough to connect the dots for myself. Not long ago, for example, I met with one of their senior operators. He's a leading economist who served as the chairman of the Federal Reserve during the last crisis. He's considered one of the most influential minds in banking today. We met privately during a conclave in Seoul, South Korea. Of course, I'm talking about Ben Bernanke. I came away from my meeting with him stunned and convinced that ice nine was real. Not long before that, I set a 1 on 1 meeting with another member of the network. His name is Zhu Min, the former deputy governor of China's Central Bank. Until recently, he served as deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund. Zhu is a brilliant guy like Bernanke, and he's pleasant and well meaning. There's no doubt in my mind that he's also a member of the elite network preparing to impose ICE 9 on millions of Americans, but I wasn't done with my research. I have since met with dozens of senior officials, intelligence analysts, and former Wall Street colleagues. My quest led to a final meeting, a face to face summit with the head of Bilderberg. We met at Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, and he was very eager to get my take on the euro as a currency. I was happy to provide it, of course, in exchange for some valuable intelligence. As I say in my new book, he did not have horns. In fact, he gave me a nice gift when we parted ways, a blue Swedish buzz. I keep it in my writing studio at my home in Connecticut. But my point is I came away from all 3 meetings convinced of one thing. When the next crisis hits, the elites are planning to freeze the financial system and they'll replace with a new system, one not based on the US dollar. When that happens, we'll wake up to a very strange and disturbing new reality. Speaker 1: And for our viewers that are watching today, what Might their reality look like that morning? How does this manifest? Speaker 0: 1st, they'll have gone to bed knowing that a massive financial crisis was underway. But when they wake up, they'll find it has worsened and the contagion has spread worldwide. When they go to withdraw money, their ATM will say closed temporarily. When When they go to sell stocks, their account will say transaction not available. When they go to their local business, that business will only accept cash if it's open. As citizens realize they're being barred from the money, riots will erupt. It's going to get really bad really quickly. Speaker 1: How would such a freeze Actually work, and and wouldn't that Speaker 0: be highly illegal? Well, it wouldn't be illegal technically because they've been quietly laying the groundwork for years. They rigged the financial laws, changed the rules of the game to allow this to happen. The stage is set. They have the levers in place. The lights are positioned. Now someone just needs to flick a switch and they'll impose ICE 9 rapidly. And again, all of this will be legal because they've rigged the system in their favor. Here in the US, for example, congress pushed through something called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act or IEPAA. This allows the government to freeze accounts, assets, even whole Rock. The only condition is that there's some threat to national security with a foreign connection. Of course, with a global market, every financial crisis has a foreign connection. Any systemic crisis fits the bill. And the thing is, when the next crisis hits, it's going to be so bad, president Trump won't have any choice but to go along with the elite plan. Speaker 1: Wow. That that is you have to admit that sounds somewhat hard to believe. Now how could these operatives actually freeze a whole country's financial system. Speaker 0: Well, fortunately, we have some recent real life examples to study. The elites have been conducting a series of dry runs for years leading up Ice 9. Look at Cypress, for example. A few years ago, the Cypriot economy was in trouble, especially the banks. The IMF stepped in and loaned Cypress $10,000,000,000, but the loan came with strings. Now pay attention because this is precisely what they're going to do, but imagine it on a global scale. So in exchange for the capital injection, the IMF demanded control over the Cypriot banking system. More specifically, the IMF froze the entire system, literally every bank in the country, Rodey, and they did that to ensure the IMS demands were met, including strict capital controls. So how did all this impact regular citizens? Their local ATMs went dark. Even the bank branch is closed permanently in some cases. Citizens could not withdraw cash. They couldn't even transfer funds from 1 account to the other. What came next? Wealth extraction on a grand scale. The IMF basically stole 6 to 10% of all the cash in the Cypriot bank accounts. How did the at least justify this? They called it a levy, the price regular citizens had to pay for their government's missteps. Keep in mind, these asset confiscations were done at the balance sheet level with the institutions themselves. They never had to confiscate individual accounts. They froze every account by controlling a handful of the country's biggest banks. When the next crisis hits, we're going to see this here in the US and around the world, and it'll be a highly coordinated global attack on the entire system simultaneously
Saved - January 15, 2024 at 11:12 PM

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

Who owns the entire stock market? It’s not BlackRock and it’s not Vanguard. I like to call it “Megacorp” And this is Megacorp. https://t.co/oBVlksTcOw

Video Transcript AI Summary
All corporations are part of one giant mega corporation, with institutions like Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street owning major shares in various companies. These institutions, in turn, are owned by each other, creating a complex web of cross-ownership. The visualization of this ownership structure reveals that retail investors, insiders, and corporations are the main owners. The speaker emphasizes that when we buy products from well-known corporations, we are essentially supporting the mega corporation that controls them. The video concludes with gratitude for the support received and a reminder to stay curious and do independent research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you that all corporations are actually just 1 giant mega corporation? And I'm not talking about metaphorically, and I'm not talking about BlackRock. I'm talking about what's really behind BlackRock. See, we hit a 1000000 followers on TikTok this week, And I've been waiting to post this video since the very first video that I made, laying the groundwork of understanding so that we're all going to understand this now that we're here. So let's break it down real simple. If you're gonna go grocery shopping at a corporate grocery store, all these corporations are owned by these institutions. They're highlighted in red if they're on all 4 of these sheets. They're darker orange if they're on 3 of them and light orange if they're on 2. And there's only a couple that only appear once. It's mostly the same money, but we go deeper. If you go for the biggest tech companies, it's basically the exact same list for all 4 of these. That would be Vanguard, Black Rock, State Street, Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, Geode, which is similar to Fidelity Associated, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley. And then Northern Trust is on 3 of them, and Capital World Investors is the exact same thing as Capital Research and Management Company. So you might think, okay. These are the institutions that own the whole stock market, but who owns them? And see if you've been around here for a minute, you already know. They all own each other. Just a giant cross ownership pool. And this is where it gets It's really interesting. You can see way back before I even posted a single video, I was sitting in my office reading this report from an anonymous user on Reddit. And he had noticed the exact same thing that I'm talking about right now, and he wrote a program to put all that data into a visualization so we can See who owns who, and I'm about to show you what he figured out. Let's take BlackRock for example. This is a list of the top institutional owners of Black and how much of the company they own. And if you visualize it, it looks like this where the whole square is all of BlackRock's stock, And they get a percentage of that square based on how much they own. And the important colors to note are that white symbolizes us, retail investors, And gray symbolizes insiders that work at the company, so that would be like Larry Fink's stock among other people. And everything else is other giant corporations, investment banks, like BlackRock themselves own a little bit, State Street owns some, Capital World Management owns some, Bank of America owns some. You see how this works? But then you think about it and you're like, well, wait a minute, because all of these institutions are owned by other institutions. Right? So what if we put that data in here? Well, he did, and it looks like this. And you realize that all of this that was owned by Merrill Lynch is actually owned by all of these Other institutions and a little bit of us, retail, up there at the top. But here, we've only replaced Merrill Lynch's section. What about all of these guys? Well, then it looks like this. Remember, white is retail investors like you and me, and everything else is giant mega corporations. And if you go 1 layer deeper, filling in all those corporations with Their corporations you see how this program is working? And so then we simplify it to just black, gray, and white. And this is who owns BlackRock. White is retail investors like you and me. Gray is insiders at all of these corporations like CEOs and other executives. And black is just corporations owning each other. We'll call it Mega Corp. This is the same process done for Bank of America and for State Street And for Best Buy, Amazon, Macy's, groceries, food, ingredients, building and selling homes, even less white, meaning us, retail ownership. As far as I can tell, there's only 1 company on the entire stock market that is not owned by MegaCorp. And you guess who it is? Do you know? It's GameStop. Except that this photo is out of date because it's from a few years ago. It probably looks more like this if you believe the public info, which is a big if, but more on that another time. This is not a video about GameStop. This is about MegaCorp because, see, when all of the owners own each other, all of their interests are aligned. BlackRock Want State Street to do well because State Street wants BlackRock to do well because they both own each other. So who is the real final boss behind all the money? Well, isn't that the $1,000,000 question? And ever since I've been asking those more important questions, my follower growth went from this to this. So you're not going to find those answers on this channel. You're going to have to go follow me in other places. All I'll say for now is that the next time you buy a product from a corporation like Nike or Costco or Best Buy or Amazon or any of these corporations, you're buying it from the mega corporation. They're all owned by the same big money, and it's all 1 big siphon just vacuuming money out of our pockets up to the people on top. We'll make another video about how exactly they do that shortly. For now, I just want to say a huge thank you to everyone that is here And here and here, your support means the world to me, and it allows me to do this work to help support small businesses and help look for, like, the truth of what the Heck is going on in this world? For all you guys that have been here since the beginning, you are legends. I notice you in the comments. I see you. I appreciate you. Even if I don't get to as many comments and as many DMs as I used to. For all the people that have helped me do the digging, that have given me tips, that have collaborated along the way. I love you. You're amazing. Please never stop being curious. Do your own research. Don't trust the government and get ready for a lot of censorship in 2024. So the very first video I ever posted on my page Back in May of last year was about who owns everything. It only took us 8 months, a couple 100 videos, and a 1000000 followers to get right back to the exact same question. Who owns everything?
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 8:41 PM

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

Do you know who actually owns Blackrock? And why don’t they have anyone on the board? 🤔 https://t.co/EfaEB8MO1O

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, one of the top shareholders of many corporations, is actually controlled by Merrill Lynch, which owns 45% of BlackRock. Merrill Lynch, in turn, is a division of Bank of America, with Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway being the top shareholder of Bank of America. However, it is strange that neither Merrill Lynch nor Bank of America have representatives on BlackRock's board of directors, despite owning a significant portion of the company. The origins of Bank of America can be traced back to an Italian man named Amadeo Giannini. The speaker is curious about the lack of representation and invites further information or insights on the matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I found out who actually owns BlackRock, but there's something really weird about it. Because by now we know that BlackRock is in the top 3 shareholders of basically every corporation in America and beyond. And they do this using our money and things like retirement accounts, pension funds, IRAs, chain traded funds, mutual funds, but most people don't actually know who owns and controls BlackRock. We all know that it was founded by Larry Fink, and he's the face of the company, but he does not control it. When you try to find out who does control it, you'll usually find this list, which is the top institutional shareholders. Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street are right at the top just like every other company. But this is not the whole story. Because if you dig deep enough, you'll find out that actually Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock, and they're considered an insider. So they don't show up on the top institutional holders list. This merger took place in 2,006. So actually Merrill Lynch controls BlackRock in a big way. But who controls Merrill Lynch? Well, Merrill Lynch is actually a division of Bank of America because Bank of America bought them out during the o eight financial collapse. So who owns Bank of America? Well, nowadays, Warren Buffett is the top shareholder of Bank of America because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, which is his billionaire investment firm. I'm still not sure what this top one is, the 25%. That's an anomaly, and I cannot corroborate what those shares are, but I found these shares. This is a screenshot from Berkshire Hathaway's 13 f where they tell you all the things they hold. And I totaled up all of these Bank of America shares, and it equals 1,000,000,000,032,000 shares. That's 13% of Bank of America shares equal to $33,000,000,000 But I also dug in a little bit into where Bank of America came from and who founded them. And All modern banks are crazy histories of mergers and acquisitions and banks changing their names and merging with other banks probably for no particular reason. But Bank of America traces its roots back in 2 different directions. One of which we're not gonna talk about, and the other one is back to this Italian dude named our Amadeo Giannini, who acquired what was then called Banca de America d'Italia. Sorry for that accent. Over the years, it changed its name to Bank of America. And then in the biggest merger in history, merge with Charlotte based Nation Bank in 1990 what? 1998. So I just thought it was interesting that half of the lineage of Bank of America was founded by this Italian dude that got really into tally in banking back in the early 1900, you know, when like there was a certain Italian organization that was doing a lot of things with money back then. I'm sure it was all above board though. I'm, you know, like, obviously. But anyways, back to the weird thing that I can't figure out. Bank of America owns Merrill Lynch, who owns the vast majority of BlackRock. But they don't have anyone on the board as far as I can tell. Usually, the biggest shareholders of a company have representatives on the board that sort of represent their investment. But I've just shown you the whole board of directors of BlackRock, and none of them have any real ties to Merrill Lynch or Bank of America, which seems pretty weird when you own almost half the company to not have any board members. The plot thickens. So two things. If you wanna follow the history of Bank of America down the other trail, you might wind up at a certain family name that you aren't aware of, that is really hard to find on the Internet. That'll probably get videos taken down. Total conspiracy theories. And the other thing is if anyone knows more than me or is literate in this or has info about why Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no representatives on the board of BlackRock. I would love to know. After all, why would you own half of a company and then have no say in what that company is doing? Or how do they have us? And what what's the story here?
Saved - May 29, 2024 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts raises questions about a group's control over various aspects of society, including culture, media, politics, and finance. The posts suggest that this control has led to manipulation, subversion, and the suppression of dissenting voices. They also discuss the group's influence over elections, wealth distribution, and the banking system. The posts raise concerns about the impact on native populations, historical cover-ups, and the control exerted through the global vaccine rollout. The posts call for awareness, unity, and the sharing of information to challenge this alleged control.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

“WHAT IF?”🧵 PLEASE RESHARE! WHAT IF a tiny group of people had disproportionate control of culture, news,social media, politicians, banking, tech, finance, your nations’ policy, & married all presidential children? Would it concern if they had subverted & enslaved your people? https://t.co/N7RlhiXtYf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews are powerful, rich, and control the media. We should not apologize for our strength and influence in public debate. We have contributed greatly to this country's success. Use our strength for peace without apology, as peace comes through strength. Thank you for listening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are too powerful. We're too strong. We're too rich. We control the media. We have too much this. We have too much that. And we often apologetically deny our strength and our power. Don't do that. Don't do that. We have earned the right to influence public debate. We have earned the right to be heard. We have contributed disproportionately to the success of this country. Never ever apologize for using our strength and our influence in the interest of peace. And if you need a biblical source for it, just remember the psalmist who said, Hashem owes. God will give the Jewish people strength, owes. And then, only then, only then will God give the Jewish people peace. Peace will come for the Jewish people and the Jewish nation only through strength. Never apologize for using your strength for peace. Thank you. I look forward to a couple of question.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF every aspect of your culture was so manipulated that your television, radio, smartphone, teachers, & even parents became completely immersed in the massage of a machine orchestrated by this group, that even basic history was used to deceive. You’re living in Orwell’s 1984 https://t.co/2sTAV4XPNq

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF we all knew this so intrinsically true that comedians joked about it right to our faces without ever connecting the basic dots as to “they” were? What if THAT GROUP’S MEMBERS even acknowledged it in front of you? https://t.co/OF9ZZgPQgJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a list of influential people in various industries, noting the high number of Jewish individuals. They mention how different people interpret this list, some seeing privilege, conspiracy theories, or intellectual opposition. These interpretations can lead to anti-Semitic conclusions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: List of the 50 most influential people in given industries, the 50 big mockers in media, in finance, in other places. And the intention of the piece was to say, look, they're all white men, or they're mostly white men. But I looked at it and thought, oh shit, there's so many Jews. And David Duke looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. And Louis Farrakhan looked at it and said, look at all those Jews. So concepts like privilege or or or conspiracy theorizing or just the general campaign against heterodox forms of of thinking, against against intellectual difference and disputation, none of this is anti Semitic on its face. All of it leads in an anti Semitic conclusion. Right. So the 50 most influential people in
Video Transcript AI Summary
The wealthy business interests control everything, not politicians. They own land, corporations, and media. They lobby for self-interest, not critical thinking citizens. They want obedient workers, not informed individuals. The system benefits them, not the people. It's a rigged game, but many are unaware or indifferent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The real owners, the big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They're they're they're irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don't. You have no choice. You have owners. They own you. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They've long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media media news all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They they spend 1,000,000,000 of dollars every year lobbying lobbying to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. You know something? They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your social security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club. By the way, it's the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when They tell you what to believe. All day long, beating you over the head in their media, telling you what to believe, what to think, and what to buy. The table is tilted, folks. The game is rigged, and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF as a result of their control over #politics, elections became meaningless? After all, if both your liberal and conservative options had their allegiances purchased by this outside force, does it even matter who wins an election? If both sides are compromised... https://t.co/tkViyoD2lo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's control over American politics is highlighted, with claims of buying Congress, the presidency, and the media. The speaker criticizes the American media for not condemning Israel's actions, accusing them of being owned by Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu is labeled as the world's most evil man, and Americans are urged to reflect on their country's actions. The speaker expresses disappointment in America's current state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What it tells you is the control that Israel has over the American domestic political reality. Israel controls everything. We're not a sovereign state anymore. Israel literally has bought the American Congress and bought the American presidency, and bought the American establishment. Where's the American media? You know, I was always one of those people that sort of got a little uneasy when people would put up the, you know, the list of, you know, media media moguls in America and talked about how many of them were Jewish and how many had links to Israel. I'm like, oh god. That's a little anti Semitic, don't you think? Not anymore. Because the silence of the American media is deafening. The American media is standing by and allowing Israel to commit genocide, and they're not doing a damn thing about it. This should be at the top of everybody's. This should be the lead story. They should be calling out the hypocrisy of the Biden administration. They should be condemning Benjamin Netanyahu. They should be condemning Israel, but they can't because Israel owns them. Israel owns everything. And so America is going to be sacrificed on the altar of Zionism, on the altar of this Israeli state. This is all about assuaging the ego of Benjamin Netanyahu, the world's most evil man today. There's nobody in the world more evil than Benjamin Netanyahu, and he's an American friend. This is Christmas. I hope I marry every American listening looks in the mirror and pukes because that's what you should do when you look at your reflection. Because you're an American. You stand for nothing except the depth of so many people. We suck as a country. We have become so far off course. It's not even funny. Look. There's nothing the put it

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group owned the media so thoroughly that this control was always overlooked & dissents shut down? Instead other “villains”, like white supremacy, were propagandized to deflect from that control to keep people fighting one another rather than their hateful oppressors https://t.co/dVfccsDoVv

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that group had constructed cultural Marxism as a means to drive culturally subversive agendas (porn, feminism, racism) that align with communistic ideals as a way to destroy the heritage & family dynamics that built the healthy, productive society they aimed to destroy? https://t.co/VvMCX9yLVB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that control extended across social media platforms they owned (Zuckerberg & Elon both) and ALL conservative voices were merely controlled opposition that shaped public opinion without ever allowing the sheep to notice who really controlled their minds? https://t.co/lZqOtNkJPv

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a center in Silicon Valley run by a former Facebook executive, with software engineers and data scientists monitoring various platforms like Google, YouTube, Meta, Twitter, Reddit, Steam, and Amazon. We collaborate with companies from Apple to Zoom, including Twitter since its inception. We engage with both the old and new regimes, even discussing with Elon Musk. The ADL holds daily meetings with social media and other companies to regulate speech. The ADL is not a civil rights group but an intelligence organization working for a foreign entity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're gonna wanna hear this. We opened a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017, and the woman who runs it, she's the next Facebook executive. I have software engineers and data scientists working at ADL. We're monitoring all this stuff, and we're working with all the platforms, by the way, Google and YouTube and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple to Zoom, we work with all of them. Okay? That's relevant because we've been working with Twitter now for real since it was founded. We work with the old regime, working with the new regime. Like, I'm talking to Elon, and we're trying to work with them. Speaker 1: He's literally bragging out loud about how they have daily meetings with all the social media companies. Sorry. Not even just social media platforms. He said Zoom. Private conversations in order to censor speech they do not like. And let's just be a 100% straight up. The ADL is not a civil rights group. It is an intelligence organization operating within the United States on behalf of another country.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am deeply connected to Israel and seek citizenship to stand with its people. My support is not just words, but actions. Despite challenges, I choose to align with those fighting for the right to live. My request for citizenship is rooted in standing for what is right and true. Israel and America embody this spirit. I took my children to Israel after visiting Auschwitz, teaching them the importance of history. May Israel remain a symbol of hope and resilience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know why I was born. But there is something about the state of Israel that connects deeply to me. To have the privilege to stand with the Jew is a tremendous honor, spiritually. So I wanna read a letter that I, wrote that I am sending to the state of Israel. To prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the honorable officials at the state of Israel, in this moment, I have chosen to ask you for citizenship in the state of Israel. I have nothing to offer but my voice of support, and some might say that my support might be more valuable as an independent voice. Perhaps they're correct. But my request for citizenship is not about words. It is about deeds. Why, one might wonder, would I want to embrace a heritage and identity that is so ruthlessly hunted down again and again? Yet it is precisely during such moments that we must choose to stand. I anticipate no privileges or exemption from the state of Israel. I instead yearn to align myself with those willing to rise, to fight, and sacrifice for the fundamental right to live. Is this not what both Israel and America embody? In closing, my desire for dual citizenship does not stem from any expectation of gain, but from a deep rooted belief in standing with what is right and true. 10 years ago, I took my children to Israel for the first time, but we first visited Auschwitz in Poland. I told them, you cannot understand Israel without the bible or Auschwitz. May Israel remain an eternal flame of hope, a beacon of resilience, and a testament to the enduring human spirit. I don't know why I was born.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF through that control of power, they had monopolized egregiously excessive levels of the wealth of your nation while, through nepotism & bigotry, sharing & passing it on only to people “in their club” How does 2% of the US population make up half of the billionaires? https://t.co/5P4KtADQIm

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if, with these riches, these individuals positioned themselves to take control of ALL companies to ensure they could insert their chosen while destroying any opposed to their world views? After all, if you can’t become financially independent, you’re forever enslaved. https://t.co/w2kMn9Lvz9

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF great minds, like @noble_x_x_ & others below worked to explain the significance of this problem which your media intentionally obfuscated?

@noble_x_x_ - Noble

BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard collectively manage $20 TRILLION of assets …the entire GDP of the U.S. is only $23 trillion Now here's how BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard control you with those assets First, we need to understand that owning a stock means you own a portion of the corporation the stock is issued based on And with that ownership comes one very important right: the right to vote your shares to determine what the corporation does Shareholder voting within a corporation is exactly as it sounds: you vote on certain issues and proposals put forth by the corporation. The more shares you have, the more votes you get — so if you own 30% of all the shares of the company, you get 30% of the votes. Results of votes are generally decided by simple majority. Pretty straight forward, right? Now what gets voted on at these shareholder meetings? The voting determines the major changes to how the corporation will maintain or change the way it interacts with the world around it as well as how the corporation is managed internally These votes can determine big things, to name a few: -diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives -executive compensation -board of director's policies -the political policies of the corporation However hands down the biggest decision made by the shareholder vote is who sits on the board of directors. The board of directors decides: -the objectives and goals of a company -the management and senior executives of a company -the company policies (including political policies) -brand image and advertising Yes — there is some overlap between what the board of directors does and what the shareholder vote determines. Responsibilities differ from company to company Now that we have the basics out of the way, how does voting shares of a corporation play in to BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard (I'll call them "BSSV" from now on) controlling you? Let's first look at how each of BSSV's ownerships are structured (all three are basically structured the same) What BSSV generally does is pretty simple: they buy stock shares of a specific company (Apple, Tesla, etc.) and package those stock shares with similar stock shares in to something called an ETF or a Mutual Fund. Then they sell a piece of resulting pool of those stocks to you so you can own a bunch of stocks without having to buy each of them individually (this is simplified but the basics hold true) For instance, let's say you want to buy technology companies but don’t know which specific company you want to buy or you can't afford to buy a bunch of different companies. In that case, BSSV would simplify the process for you by buying stocks of a whole bunch of different tech companies that they then package in to an ETF or Mutual Fund which you can then buy shares in allowing you to get ownership to all those companies at a fraction of the cost and effort! And these bundles can be created with any industry, sector, or with any other group of companies — from tech to oil to the entire S&P 500 So it seems like a win-win, right? You get to own a bundle of a bunch of different stocks you couldn’t otherwise get access to and BSSV gets a very small fee for helping you get that exposure They seem like such nice guys, right? How on earth could this be sinister? Not so fast — when you buy these stocks through BSSV in ETFs and Mutual funds you give up one very important thing: you give up your right to vote at the shareholder meeting for each of those individual companies You give up the right to choose the board of directors who determine the course of actions the company will pursue and you give up the right to vote on those political and policy decisions directions the company will take But most importantly: YOU GIVE THAT VOTING RIGHT TO BSSV “So what, BSSV can vote a few shares of a company? There must be way more shareholders out there that also vote” For this, I'd ask you to do an experiment. Pick any major company. Now google who its largest Shareholders are The largest shareholders will almost always include or be composed of BSSV. Of all the stocks in the S&P 500 at least one of the members of BSSV is the largest shareholder in 88% of the companies “But on average they only collectively own around 15% of most of these companies, that's not 50% control” True but a 15% difference in voting for board members or policies where most other shareholders are indifferent or uneducated on the policies (thus their votes are closer to a 50/50 split) is enough to sway almost every item that's voted on “Well at least the three of them must have differing views? They all must compete for different shareholder vote outcomes, right?” Wrong The unique thing about BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard is that their own largest shareholders are: Each Other So they all decide each other's boards of directors and all control each other's shareholder votes. Then once BSSV's own boards are chosen they choose the boards of the companies they control Now how is this control actually exerted? What are the manifestations of it that actually impact us? I'll keep this succinct so this doesn't run too long but corporations exert control over our society in a number of ways On the social front this means BSSV can control almost every intersection of our lives with corporations. Our news, our social media, our financial institutions, our cinema and television, our retailers, our clothing stores, and even our food are all subservient to BSSV and the boards of directors they appoint In the political landscape this control can be exerted through campaign contributions, lobbying, PACS, issue advocacy, regulatory capture, think tanks, revolving doors, trade associations, policy development, and campaign advertising amongst others (to name a few) This is also why every corporation appears to be move in lock-step in their support of things like ESG investing, Black Lives Matter, and other social causes: because behind the scenes BSSV purposefully elects boards that champion their values and beget their interests The players on each board are different but their ideologies are the same…because their ideologies are BSSV's ideology For many years now BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard have controlled almost every aspect of our lives without us knowing Let's break that cycle (@patrickbetdavid does a good analysis in this video as well but imo disregards the importance of voting rights as the mechanism of control) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mvh4o6x3-GQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, speaking of wealth, your nations entire banking system had been architected, not to protect its people, but to forever enslave them as a nation into endlessly covering the costs for the ultra rich & foreign governments? Perhaps like our federal reserve #economics https://t.co/QtUNhBpVXn

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that tiny group of people used that control to shape opinions of the masses in favor of policies extremely detrimental to the native people of that country? To vote against their own wages & the protection of their culture via endless immigration of poor, violent migrants https://t.co/8T9bV1zHEy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wir werden in einer multikulturellen Stadt leben, die von verschiedenen Ethnien lebt. Es sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren werden, aber wir machen ein Experiment, eine monokulturelle Demokratie in eine multiethnische umzuwandeln. Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich radikal verändern, und das ist gut so, besonders in Richtung Rechts. We will live in a multicultural city with many different ethnicities. More Germans die than are born, but we are trying to transform a monocultural democracy into a multiethnic one. Our society will change drastically, and that's a good thing, especially towards the right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir werden in einer Stadt leben, in der es einfach ist, dass unsere Stadt davon lebt, dass wir ganz viele verschiedene Ethnien haben, ganz viele Menschen, dass wir eine super kulturelle Gesellschaft haben, meine Damen und Herren. Speaker 1: Jedes Jahr sterben mehr Deutsche als geboren während. Das liegt zum Glück daran, dass die Nazis sich auch nicht besonders verfehlt werden. Zum Zweiten, dass wir hier ein historisch einzigartiges Experiment wagen, und zwar in einem multiethenische, monokulturelle Demokratie in einem multiethenische zu verwandeln. Das kann klappen, das wird glaub ich auch klappen. Aber dabei kommt es natürlich auch zu vielen Bewerbungen. Speaker 0: Unsere Gesellschaft wird sich ändern. Unsere Stadt wird sich radikal verändern. Ich bin der Auffassung, dass wir in Und ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich: Gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, Ich sage Ihnen noch ganz deutlich, gerade hier in Richtung Rechts, das ist gut so!

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF.. that group was so bold with their control that they celebrated it right in your face encouraging “their people” to embrace, continue, and further this monopoly on power... would THAT concern you? What if that same group celebrated white extinction & genocide? https://t.co/qdt4TAfC5x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that Jews are influential worldwide because it is God's will. They mention the Torah as proof, stating that Jews will always stand out in every nation. Despite being a small community compared to Americans, Jews are prominent in various fields like politics, with examples given of Jewish involvement with Trump, Biden, and Obama. The speaker highlights the historical pattern of Jewish influence in different countries and urges against hatred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Jews run the show in the world, not because they want, because that's what God wants. And it's written in the Torah that the non Jews admit that it's the word of God. If they didn't admit, what's the proof? But in the Torah, it says that in every nation you will be, you will always be the highlight of the place. Even though we have very small community compared to America, 300,000,000 Americans, 5,000,000 Jews. No comparison. But the Jews are everywhere. Politics. All the assistance of Trump, Jews. All the assistance of Sleepy Joe Jews. Obama, Jews, everyone around them, reformed Jew, conservative Jews, Chabadnik, this, Convent. It's all somehow. Same thing was in Spain. Same thing was in many different countries. Instead of hating the
Video Transcript AI Summary
Europeans will pay dearly for their ignorance, as Islam aims to eradicate Italy and Christianity. This war is seen as necessary for Israel's protection. The rise of Islam in Europe is viewed as a positive development for the Jewish people. The prophecy foretells that Israel will ultimately prevail and dominate the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vous allez le payer très cher les européens, mais à point, vous n'avez même pas notion de quoi on parle. Et vous n'aurez pas aussi. Quand l'Italie disparaîtra, quand Edom, c'est pour ça que le q g de la chrétienté qui vient de Essave se trouve là-bas, quand cet endroit-là disparaîtra et c'est ce que veut faire l'islam il s'occupe l'islam c'est le le ballet d'Israël sachez-le. C'est-à-dire que je vous jure qu'on fasse son travail et on voit pour Dieu le problème. Quand il va débarrasser tout ça et que le va va revenir chez nous alors c'est. Cette guerre-là dans le monde dans lequel on vit elle est nécessaire pourquoi est-ce qu'elle est nécessaire parce que l'un va utiliser l'autre pour ne pas qu'Israël rentre en guerre Akadosh Barch, Tabarshi Molaad, il est le Krafat Saïm, va provoquer que Ischmael se lève contre Issa. Donc ce que vous êtes en train de subir en France, en Europe, fait tellement peur, ça devrait être pour nous la plus belle nouvelle de notre histoire juive. Enfin, on commence à s'y accrocher. Enfin, on commence à réaliser ce que les sages nous avaient prescrit avant. Ce que je vous ai dit tout à l'heure c'est marqué dans le sien viendra que quand Edom, l'Europe, la chrétienté sera totalement tombée. Je vous pose la question, c'est une bonne nouvelle que l'islam envahisse l'Europe C'est une excellente nouvelle, ça lance dans une machine. Speaker 1: De grandes hécatombes se prépareront dans le pays d'Edom Rome c'est un jour de vengeance pour l'éternel une année de représailles pour la cause de. Tout ça, c'est marqué dans le prophète. Speaker 2: Et ce sera le monde juif qui va grandir et grandir et que ce serait la nation qui elle va gérer le monde. La terre d'Israël, la catastrophe d'autrui va la tirer le monde entier, ça sera Israël et Israël, ça sera Yeru Shalaïm. Et la seule personne qui va dominer dans le monde, ce sera d'être attaché. Avec le macher, cette pierre qui elle va grandir, sera le peuple d'Israël.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF these same patterns had emerged previously in other nations resulting in conflict: & expulsions as the same turmoil and poverty had been pushed on generations of the past? WHAT IF we were seemingly repeating predictable cycles?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

You live in Weimerica 2.0 🧵 Almost a century ago, post-WW1 Germany was in rubble; its people & culture impoverished & humiliated. Its infrastructure & economy was destroyed by a corrupt minority “group” which monopolized their banking, politics,& media Sound familiar? READ ON: https://t.co/Ry6RQr3i7g

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Weimar Republic in Germany was marked by high unemployment, hunger, and despair among the people. Suicide rates were high, with over 30% unemployment leading to desperate actions. Birth rates were low, and anarchy and chaos prevailed. The disarmed and hungry German population felt helpless as communists took control of parts of cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unemployment, hunger, and a hopeless future distinguished the Weimar Republic to the German people. Suicide rates were high. Unemployment topped 30% as desperate Germans committed suicide. Birth rates were extremely low. Anarchy and chaos was in the air. There was nothing the disarmed, humiliated and hungry German people could do about it as communists even seized parts of many cities. In 19

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group, to cover up these historical patterns had constructed elaborate, demonstrably dishonest stories to deflect any and all critiques? WHAT IF those stories contained indefensible plot holes? (THIS IS CLEARLY JUST A QUESTION NOT A STATEMENT)

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

👀QUESTION👀 Why would Anne Frank's step sister Eva Schloss claim that photographic evidence of the liberation of Auschwitz was all “fake”? She states film crews went back MONTHS LATER and staged it Does this not make you question this piece of “history”? 🔎 @TonightsGame https://t.co/nsI6vc4iC8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions the liberation of all camps in Poland, not just Auschwitz. They point out that photos of the Russian liberation of Auschwitz lack snow, which was actually present. The Russian embassy confirmed that the photos were taken after the fact when cameras were available. The speaker emphasizes that the photos do not accurately depict Auschwitz's liberation due to the lack of snow and the presence of well-dressed individuals and children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And only Auschwitz. They liberated all the camps in Poland, and that is really not known. And something I wanted to point out to you, you know, there are many pictures about the Russian liberating Auschwitz, and there's never any snow. And the snow was honestly that high. Mhmm. And so I have some connection with the Russian embassy, and I was there once. And I said, something puzzles me. Those photos are fakes because there's no snow. And they said, well, yes, they are not fakes. But when the army came, they didn't have cameras. They didn't photograph. So only much later when they realized we should have pictures of it, they took pictures Right. Like you see now. But this is definitely not in Auschwitz and not the liberation of ours. The the There were not that many people with clothes and children and no snow. Right. Fascinating. So I only Auschwitz.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that “history” was seemingly merely a projection to cover up their prior wrongdoings and to obscure truths about their aspirations for world domination? What if terms they created, like “the final solution”, were entirely, intentionally misattributed?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

THE FINAL SOLUTION🧵 As genocide in Gaza is being compared to the “evil NAZIs”, it’s time we explore some unusual & inconvenient truths from WW2. Buckle up, this’ll be uncomfortable For starters, did you know, historically,Jews had been expelled from 100 nations? Why? READ ON👇 https://t.co/qa9d8YG3NA

Video Transcript AI Summary
For centuries, Europeans and Jews have struggled to coexist, with Jews being expelled from over 100 nations. They were granted full rights but allegedly exploited and corrupted host nations, leading to conflicts. Jewish supremacists often attribute these issues to antisemitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For centuries, Europeans and Jews have had problems living together. The Jews have been expelled from over 100 nations before. This expulsion was not something new. Every single nation with the Jews were given full rights and privileges. They had exploited and morally corrupted the host nation, defiled the Gentiles, and then created uproars against themselves. The Jewish supremacists have, of course, always been able to put a blame on quote unquote antisemitism. The National

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that ideology was once put in place under the rule of that group only to result in the worst recorded #genocide in history? A genocide most are completely ignorant to as it’s not taught in schools or propagandized by #Hollywood - perhaps due to aforementioned control?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

HISTORY OF BOLSHEVISM🧵 Little to NO education is given on the origin of #communism or its inseparable bond to Zionism. Time to fix that in an emotionless fashion. No animosity intended We must begin with Moses Hess, the father of #Zionism #Palestine #israel #Gaza_under_attack https://t.co/LnXddAgI06

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 19th century, Moses Hess introduced communist principles and laid the groundwork for Zionism in his book "Rome and Jerusalem." He advocated for a Jewish ethno state in Palestine, despite the Arab majority. Hess believed in a race struggle between Aryans and Semites, with Jews emerging as superior. He promoted eugenics, racial purity, and a future Jewish state. He also criticized Christianity as the "religion of death" and predicted a war in Europe involving Germany, Italy, and Austria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the middle of 19th century, Moses Hess formulated the first written principles of communism. In 18/62, Hess or the communist rabbi as he was called, wrote the book Rome and Jerusalem in which he laid the foundations for a Jewish nationalist movement called Zionism. In the book, he called on the Jewish people to become separatists and to prepare for the creation of a future homogeneous Jewish ethno state. Palestine would be occupied by the Jewish people, but the big problem was Palestine was at this time 19 to 95% Arab. Hess argued that international Jewish bankers would help in this realization of stealing the land from the Palestinians. Hess suggested in his book that one last race and class struggle was being developed between the Aryans and the Semites. In this fight, has predicted that the Jews would stand as winners and the Europeans as losers. The Jews would stand superior over all of the peoples and because Jews had preserved their racial purity over the centuries, it would give them a leading role in the world. Hess essentially promoted eugenics and racial hygiene for the Jews and talked about a future Jewish ethno state. He also referred to Christianity as the religion of death. Fascinatingly, he predicted a future war in Europe with Germany, Italy, and Austria involved as part of a race struggle. Most success was

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And WHAT IF that group has commit MULTIPLE genocides, all driven by the same ethnic hatred and a belief of racial superiority? https://t.co/RheYZ3WBqB

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF that group was almost universally in control of a global vaccine that was rolled out and coerced into the arms of the masses by controlled politicians & media? What if that vaccine was now resulting in endless illnesses & deaths for all BUT THOSE IN THAT GROUP? https://t.co/y7u6Pnha5M

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the fight against COVID-19, Pfizer CEO Dr. Albert Bourla, a child of Holocaust survivors, played a key role in developing the vaccine. His Jewish heritage and support for Israel are notable. Over 2.5 billion Pfizer vaccine doses have been distributed worldwide. For his contributions, Dr. Bourla received the 2022 Genesis Prize, known as the Jewish Nobel Prize. The pandemic continues, but Dr. Bourla's efforts have made a significant impact in saving lives globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the global fight against COVID 19, the Jewish people who make up a tiny percentage of the world's population have had an outsized impact in the difficult battle to protect lives as scientists. Chief medical officers, and top health care officials. Yet the contributions of one extraordinary person tower above the rest. That extraordinary person is Pfizer chairman and CEO, doctor Albert Bourla. Doctor Bourla led his team to deliver a COVID 19 vaccine in record A child A child of holocaust survivors from a Greek Jewish community destroyed by the Nazis, he's proud of his Jewish heritage, is active in holocaust remembrance and education, and a strong supporter of Israel, which was the first country outside the US to receive the Pfizer vaccine and the antiviral pill. The pandemic is certainly not over, but the world is infinitely better off with doctor Borla helping lead the charge to save lives with more than 2 and a half 1000000000 Pfizer vaccine doses already distributed. Because of doctor Borla's extraordinary contribution to humanity as the world battles the worst health crisis in 100 years, Doctor Albert Bourla has been selected as the recipient of the 2022 Genesis Prize, the Jewish Nobel Prize. Thank you, and congratulations, doctor Borla.
Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 targets Caucasians, Black people, and Chinese. We must ensure everyone has access to tools to combat the virus, not just those who can afford them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID 19 is targeted to attack, Caucasians and and, and, black people. The people who are most immune are asking us to choose and, and Chinese. Speaker 1: But also reminded of us when we have these weapons, these weapons. Speaker 0: These weapons Speaker 1: our these these tools, we must find ways that they reach all and not only those that they can afford.

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF that same group used historical atrocities like slavery & the Holocaust to justify endless hatred of the host whites while hiding their involvement in precisely those injustices? What if THEY were the ones who commit genocide in WW2 and enslaved the majority of Africans? https://t.co/5vW5pS1U0G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews played a significant role in the slave trade in Brazil, Suriname, Curacao, Barbados, and Jamaica. The two largest slave shipments to the US in the 18th century were on Jewish-owned ships. Aaron Lopez, a prominent slave ship owner, was Jewish. In Newport, Rhode Island, all rum distilleries during the slave trade era were owned by Jews. Census data from 1830 shows a higher per capita ownership of slaves by Jewish households in the US compared to white gentiles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. It is true as we now know that the Jews were the major element in the slave trade in Brazil in the 1600, in Suriname, in Curacao, in Barbados, in Jamaica. Yes, it is true, as we now know, that the 2 largest single shipments of slaves coming into this country in 18th century were on ships owned by Jews. It is true, as we now know, that Aaron Lopez, biggest slave ship owner in the United States of America, was a Jew. It is also true, as we now know, that all the rum distilleries in Newport, Rhode Island, in the era of the slave trade were owned by Jews. Rum, as we know, was a very important item in the transatlantic slave trade. Yes. It is true, as we now know, that there was a higher per capita ownership of slaves in the United States of America by Jews, done by white gentiles. We now know from the 18 30 census of the US of 8, that something like 75% of Jewish households own slaves as opposed to just 30 odd percent for the white population as a whole. Yes,
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why white men are always blamed for the slave trade when Jewish ships and Arabs played a significant role. Another speaker suggests that Jewish dominance in academia and publishing allows them to shift blame onto others, like Italians or whites, while operating behind the scenes. Jews, like Meyer Lansky in the mafia, are portrayed as orchestrating events while deflecting attention onto others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is the white man always vilified for this when it was the Jewish ships and the Arabs that were actually the biggest part of the slave trade? Speaker 1: You have to look at who is dominant in history as far as academia, literature, the publishing houses. Most of them are Jewish ran. It's just like with the mafia. Most people think Italian when it comes to the mafia, but it's really Jewish. Jews are behind the books. Meyer Lansky was the banker of the mafia. He handled the books. So it's like with everything else. The Jews will be behind the scenes. They'll put the blame on whites. They'll put the blame on Italians, the blame on others. That's how they stay hidden to do their thing. Speaker 0: Why is
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish involvement in the African slave trade predates the transatlantic slave trade by about 1000 years. The transatlantic slave trade began in 1441 when Portuguese sailors kidnapped Africans and brought them to Europe. Africans were taken to the Caribbean in 1502, where the transatlantic slave trade started. The theoretical justification for the slave trade was based on the Hamitic myth, also known as the curse of Ham story, to rationalize and justify the trade.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But before I describe what happened, let me spend a couple a few minutes summarizing the facts of Jewish involvement in the slave trade. What precisely was the nature of the Jewish involvement in the African slave trade? The Jewish involvement in the African slave trade begins as far as I can tell long before the actual slave trade across the Atlantic itself. The transatlantic slave trade has its immediate origins around about 14/41 when Portuguese sailors landed on the West African coast and kidnapped a few Africans, brought them back to Europe. Africans were brought back to Europe, to Portugal and to Spain as part of that particular trade for several years. Columbus, of course, arrived in the Americas in 14/92, approximately half a century later. In 15/02, the first Africans were brought to the Caribbean. The Caribbean is where the transatlantic slave trade begins and many Americans don't know that. But for over a 100 years before Africans were brought as slaves to this country, the United States of America, Africans were being brought across the Atlantic to the Caribbean, to places like Hispaniola, the island which today is shared by Haiti and the Dominican Republic and to other places as well. So it seems to me that Jewish involvement then in that transatlantic slave trade precedes by many, many years, perhaps by 1000 years, the actual beginnings of the transatlantic slave trade. And let me explain. It seems to me that the most important theoretical underpinning for that Transatlantic Slave Trade was what has come to be known in many quarters of the Hamitic myth. Some people call it the curse of Ham story. When the slave trade developed beginning in 14/41 and for 100 of years thereafter, people who prosecuted that trade looked around for intellectual justification, for rationalizations, for pretexts, if you want, if you will. And a variety of pretexts were advanced to justify the slave trade, to allow people to sleep well at night.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish historians reveal a history of Jewish involvement in the slave trade, with auctions closing on Jewish holidays. Jews dominated the slave trade for centuries in the Western world, dating back to Roman times. The Roman Jews relied on slavery for income, while Charlemagne and Pope Gelasius allowed Jewish involvement in the slave trade. Throughout history, Jews were prominent slave dealers in European society, with higher slave holdings per capita than non-Jews. This information is documented in various Jewish historical sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jewish slave trading on the American continent. Jewish historians record old Jewish documents showing how the slave trade was so thoroughly Jewish. The slave auctions throughout the Americas had to close on Jewish holidays. In Brazil, we see far more slaves in North America. Abe Witzner, another official of the Jewish Historical Society, in his book, Jews in Colonial Brazil, pages they could buy slaves at low prices. If it happened at the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday, the auction had to be postponed. Studying the Jewish histories of the new world, I began to learn of a carefully recorded Jewish history that you and I are not permitted to know about. I discovered that many centuries before the transatlantic slave trade, that Jews had dominated the slave trade in the entire western world of the last 2000 years, even as far back as Roman times. Lincoln and Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia in volume 10 page 48 writes, quote, the trade in slavery constituted the main source of livelihood for the Roman Jews. In the 5th century, Pope Gelasius permitted Jews to introduce slaves from Gaul into Italy on the condition that they were non Christian. In the 8th century, Charlemagne explicitly allowed the Jews to act as intermediaries in the slave trade. In a history of the Jews from Babylonian exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish publication exile to the end of World War 2, published by the Jewish Publication Society of America, the author writes, quote, the Jews were among the most important slave dealers in European society. And here's a quote from the famous Jewish historian Jacob Marcus in the Encyclopedia Britannica. He, matter of factly, talks about the Jewish control of commerce in the Middle Ages. Quote, in the dark ages, the commerce of Western Europe was largely in his hand, in particular, the slave trade. Not only were Jews the principal slave traders, they had markedly higher per capita holdings of slaves than did non Jews. Jacob Marxists wrote in the United States Jewry 17/76/1985, page 586, quote, often the 18th century

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if you never learned any of these truths as Hollywood & academia were entirely manipulated to ensure they remained buried? And WHAT IF if all in power to change it were blackmailed by a global pedophile ring run in coordination with corrupt politicians? https://t.co/m42lFYMKpX

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF free speech was continuously being limited & restricted to ensure these types of questions weren’t even allowed to be asked? What if even “right wing” politicians groveled down to this same group to demanded people’s silence? What if it was made ILLEGAL like in Europe? https://t.co/7x1apcMG5C

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

WHAT IF, you’ve never heard these questions? What if you’ve never seen this page as @x hides it? Well it would make sense as it’s CLEARLY censored at every turn BECAUSE I ASK THESE OBVIOUS QUESTIONS But now you know. Now you’ll start to see these obvious patterns. So, what next?

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

It’s now undeniable. @X is removing followers from my page along with likes, retweets, & quote tweets of my pinned “What if?” thread- “the machine” is exposed & scared Americans, regardless of political party, it’s time to unify and stand firmly opposed to “this machine” https://t.co/VynS9r0LRQ

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

And what if it’s not just me but: @utism @SamParkerSenate @NickJFuentes @ChiefTrumpster @christ_gnosis @raymo_g @TheRISEofROD @pl0t_sickens @pepedownunder @realstewpeters @Lucas_Gage_ @arthurkwonlee @Gentilenewsnet @Genghis_Khan911 @KeithWoodsYT @AtRealBen @RealCandaceO

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

AND WHAT IF even speaking this truth puts me at risk of shadow banning, suspension, or ejection from social media? If so, IT STILL MUST BE STATED BECAUSE TRUTH MATTERS So PLEASE, SHARE THIS, join this cause, spread the word, awaken the masses - white existence depends on it. https://t.co/NDphjhaK6X

Video Transcript AI Summary
Life cannot be contained. Evolution shows us that it breaks free, expands, and overcomes barriers, sometimes dangerously. That's just the way it is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not possible. Listen. If there's one thing the history of evolution has taught us, it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free. It expands to new territories, and it crashes through barriers painfully, maybe even dangerously. But, well, there it is.
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 12:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread argues that concentrated asset managers threaten democracy. It claims Vanguard and BlackRock will total ~$20 trillion by 2028 and effectively own much of the world, with Vanguard’s ownership hidden and controlled by the richest families. It questions NGO and WEF funding links to BlackRock, Open Society, and the Gates Foundation, and points to a video titled “MONOPOLY – Who Owns The World?” for context.

@DavidLWindt - David Windt

"This is extremely dangerous to our democracy."

@DavidLWindt - David Windt

Vanguard and BlackRock: "experts expect that by 2028, both companies will collectively manage about $20 trillion in investments, and in the process, will own almost everything on Earth." "BlackRock's largest shareholder is Vanguard, and this is where it gets dark. Vanguard itself has a unique structure that makes it impossible to see who its shareholders or clients are. The elite who own Vanguard don't want anyone to know that they are the owners of the most powerful company on Earth."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that BlackRock and Vanguard form an extraordinary concentration of power in global finance. It states that these two companies are the largest institutional investors in every major company, and that they also own the other institutional investors, creating a supposed monopoly over corporate ownership. A Bloomberg report is cited, claiming that by 2028 the two firms will collectively manage about $20 trillion in investments and will own almost everything on earth. Bloomberg is said to have called BlackRock the fourth arm of government because it is the only non-government entity with a close relationship to central banks; BlackRock is described as lending money to federal banks, serving as their principal advisor, and developing the computer systems used by the central banks. The transcript notes that dozens of BlackRock employees held senior White House positions during the Bush and Obama administrations and that some remain in government roles under Joe Biden. It also describes BlackRock CEO Larry Fink as a welcome guest to many heads of state and politicians, and asserts that he is the face of the company “that pulls the strings,” though it adds that BlackRock is owned by shareholders. It claims that BlackRock’s largest shareholder is Vanguard, and highlights Vanguard’s “unique structure” that supposedly makes it impossible to see who its shareholders or clients are, alleging that the elite who own Vanguard do not want anyone to know they are the owners of the most powerful company on earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The power of these two companies is something we can barely imagine. Not only are they the largest institutional investors of every major company on earth, they also own the other institutional investors of those companies, giving them a complete monopoly. According to a report by Bloomberg, one of the most respected institutions in the world in the field of financial data and analytics, experts expect that by 2028, both companies will collectively manage about $20,000,000,000,000 in investments, and in the process, will own almost everything on earth. The same Bloomberg called BlackRock the fourth arm of government because it is the only non government entity that has a close relationship with the federal banks, also called the central banks. BlackRock not only lends money to the federal banks, but is also their principal advisor and the developer of the computer system that the federal banks use. Dozens of BlackRock employees had senior positions in the White House during the Bush and the Obama administrations and currently under Joe Biden. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is a welcome guest with many heads of state and politicians, And understandably so, he's the face of the company that pulls the strings. Yet, Larry Fink does not pull the strings himself. In fact, BlackRock itself is owned by shareholders. And if we look at who those shareholders are, we come to a strange conclusion. We see that BlackRock's largest shareholder is Vanguard, and this is where it gets dark. Vanguard itself has a unique structure that makes it impossible to see who its shareholders or clients are. The elite who own Vanguard don't want anyone to know that they are the owners of the most powerful company on Earth.

@DavidLWindt - David Windt

"Vanguard is in the hands of the richest families on Earth."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Vanguard is controlled by the richest families on Earth. By examining their history, these families have consistently occupied the top of the power pyramid, with some tracing their influence back to well before the industrial revolution. The speaker indicates that these families’ histories are extensive and important, and promises to explain more about them in a follow-up video the speaker is currently working on. The speaker points out that many of these powerful families belong to royal bloodlines and asserts that they are the founders of several global systems: the banking system, the United Nations, and various industries around the world. According to the speaker, these families never lost their power over time. To account for their continued influence in a world with a growing population, the speaker claims that these families hid behind investment companies such as Vanguard. The assertion is that Vanguard’s largest shareholders are private funds and nonprofit organizations connected to these same families. In summary, the speaker presents a narrative in which a small set of historically powerful, often royal-lineage families maintain enduring control by leveraging investment vehicles like Vanguard, with ownership concentrated in private funds and nonprofit entities tied to those families. The implication is that this arrangement allows these families to remain hidden while exerting broad influence over major financial institutions, global governance structures, and key industries. The speaker also signals that more detailed exploration of these families will be provided in a forthcoming follow-up video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vanguard is in the hands of the richest families on Earth. If we study their history, we discover that these families have always belonged to the top of the pyramid, some even well before the industrial revolution began. Because their history is so interesting and extensive, I will explain some more about them in the follow-up video that I'm currently working on. But in order not to elaborate too far, I will just point out that many of these families belong to royal bloodlines and they are the founders of our banking system, the United Nations, and every industry in the world. These families never lost their power. But because of an increasing world population, they were forced to hide behind investment companies such as Vanguard, whose largest shareholders are the private funds and nonprofit organizations of these families.

@DavidLWindt - David Windt

"Is it not strange that the world's leading environmental organizations have been meeting for 50 years with the CEOs of the most heavily polluting corporations, while things just keep getting worse for our natural world? That these critics of the WEF are right soon becomes clear when we look at who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WEF's budget. They are Blackrock, The Open Society Foundations, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and many other large corporations of whom Vanguard and Blackrock own the shares directly or indirectly."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether it is strange that leading environmental organizations have met for fifty years with CEOs of heavily polluting corporations while the natural world keeps getting worse. They say that critics of the WAF are right when considering who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WES budget. The partners include BlackRock, the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other large corporations, of whom Vanguard and BlackRock own the shares directly or indirectly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it not strange that the world's leading environmental organizations have been meeting for fifty years with the CEOs of the most heavily polluting corporations while things just keep getting worse for our natural world? That these critics of the WAF are right soon becomes clear when we look at who the most important partners are that account for almost 71% of the WES budget. There are BlackRock, the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and many other large corporations of whom Vanguard and BlackRock own the shares directly or indirectly.

@DavidLWindt - David Windt

"MONOPOLY - Who Owns The World?" by Tim Gielen Full video: https://rumble.com/vrxm15-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-by-tim-gielen-english-subs.html

"MONOPOLY - Who Owns The World?" by Tim Gielen (English Subs) “MONOPOLY: Who Owns The World?” (25/09/2021) Less than a handful of megacorporations dominate every aspect of our lives. From the breakfast that’s on the table in the morning, to the mattress we sleep rumble.com
Saved - August 29, 2024 at 2:12 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

He found out who owns BlackRock https://t.co/m1kE2seHMT

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock is a top shareholder in most corporations, using funds from retirement accounts and other investments. While Larry Fink founded BlackRock, he doesn't control it. Institutional shareholders like Vanguard and State Street appear at the top of shareholder lists, but Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock and is considered an insider, so they don't appear on those lists. Merrill Lynch is a division of Bank of America, which acquired it during the 2008 financial crisis. Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is Bank of America's top shareholder, owning 13% of its shares, worth $33 billion. Bank of America traces its roots to Amadeo Giannini, who acquired Banca de America D'Italia, later renamed Bank of America. Despite owning a large portion of BlackRock, Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no apparent representatives on BlackRock's board of directors. The speaker is seeking information about why these major shareholders have no board representation and how they exert their influence on the company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I found out who actually owns BlackRock, but there's something really weird about it. Because by now we know that BlackRock is in the top three shareholders of basically every corporation in America and beyond. And they do this using our money in things like retirement accounts, pension funds, IRAs, chain traded funds, mutual funds. But most people don't actually know who owns and controls BlackRock. We all know that it was founded by Larry Fink, and he is the face of the company, but he does not control it. When you try to find out who does control it, you'll usually find this list, which is the top institutional shareholders. Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street are right at the top, just like every other company. But this is not the whole story. Because if you dig deep enough, you'll find out that actually Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock, and they're considered an insider. So they don't show up on the top institutional holders list. This merger took place in 2,006. So actually, Merrill Lynch controls BlackRock in a big way. But who controls Merrill Lynch? Well, Merrill Lynch is actually a division of Bank of America because Bank of America bought them out during the o eight financial collapse. So who owns Bank of America? Well, nowadays, Warren Buffett is the top shareholder of Bank America because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, which is his billionaire investment firm. I'm still not sure what this top one is, this 25%. That's an anomaly and I cannot corroborate what those shares are, but I found these shares. This is a screenshot from Berkshire Hathaway's 13 f where they tell you all the things they hold. And I totaled up all of these bank of America shares and it equals 1,000,000,000 32,000,000 shares. That's 13% of bank of America shares equal to $33,000,000,000 But I also dug in a little bit into where bank of America came from and who founded them. And all modern banks are crazy histories of mergers and acquisitions and banks changing their names and merging with other banks probably for no particular reason. But bank of America traces its roots back in 2 different directions, one of which we're not gonna talk about. And the other one is back to this Italian dude named our Amadeo Giannini, who acquired what was then called Banca de America D'Italia. Sorry for that accent. Over the years, it changed its name to Bank of America. And then in the biggest merger in history, merge with Charlotte based Nation Bank in 1990 what? 1998. I just thought it was interesting that half of the lineage of Bank of America was founded by this Italian dude that got really into Italian banking back in the early 1900, you know, when like there was a certain Italian organization that was doing a lot of things with money back then. I'm sure it was all above board though. I'm, you know, like, obviously. But anyways, back to the weird thing that I can't figure out. Bank of America owns Merrill Lynch, who owns the vast majority of BlackRock, but they don't have anyone on the board as far as I can tell. Usually, the biggest shareholders of a company have representatives on the board that sort of represent their investment. But I've just shown you the whole board of directors of BlackRock, and none of them have any real ties to Merrill Lynch or Bank of America, which seems pretty weird when you own almost half the company to not have any board members. The plot thickens. So two things, if you wanna follow the history of Bank of America down the other trail, you might wind up at a certain family name that you aren't aware of that is really hard to find on the Internet. That'll probably get videos taken down. Total conspiracy theories. And the other thing is if anyone knows more than me or is literate in this or has info about why Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no representatives on the board of BlackRock. I would love to know. After all, why would you own half of a company and then have no say in what that company is doing? Or how do they have a say what? What's the story here?
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 11:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the immense influence of Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, who manages over $11 trillion in assets. His role became pivotal during the 2008 financial crisis when the U.S. government relied on him to stabilize the economy. BlackRock continued to grow, using public funds to expand its reach, and once again, Fink was called upon during the 2020 pandemic. Starting from humble beginnings, his relentless drive led to the founding of BlackRock after a partnership fallout. The firm's advanced software, Aladdin, keeps them ahead in market predictions. This knowledge is crucial for understanding who truly holds power today.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

This man runs the whole world and no one’s even talking about it. He manages over $11 TRILLION in assets. Amazon, Apple, and entire governments are in the palm of this man's hand. Here’s the (dark) story behind the most powerful operation in the world:

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

I'm talking about none other than Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock. The biggest investment company in the world owning top companies. Just look it up yourself… You'll see BlackRock as the top shareholder almost everywhere.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock is a publicly listed company on Nasdaq, managing over $14 trillion in assets. It holds significant shares in many major U.S. companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, airlines, and social networks. This ownership influences various agendas across these companies. For instance, when checking Amazon's stock on Yahoo Finance, it's evident that Jeff Bezos is not the largest shareholder; BlackRock and Vanguard often top the list of major holders. This highlights the extent of BlackRock's influence in the corporate landscape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We went quite viral recently on TikTok for videos about BlackRock. Mhmm. What is BlackRock, and how do they own everything? Speaker 1: Yeah. So BlackRock is an organization. It's a company publicly listed on Nasdaq that has tens of 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of assets under management. They disclosed that they have, like, 14,000,000,000,000, but that is only BlackRock. Then they own majority share in most of the companies in America. Right? So they also have money and funneled through all those things as well. So what companies? They own Pfizer. They own Moderna. They own, all the airlines. They own all the social networks. So when you see all this stuff, all this agenda kind of everybody working together, then you have to realize who actually owns it. This isn't a conspiracy. Top holders of all these shareholding companies, and you see BlackRock and Vanguard at the top. So you go to Amazon, for example, you go to Yahoo Finance. You go to Amazon. You go to the ticker of the stock. You go to top holders, and you realize Jeff Bezos ain't the biggest holder of Amazon.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

So first, let's take you back to the year 2008. The huge economic crisis. To fix the whole situation BlackRock - led by Larry Fink - had to step in. The whole US government was dependent on him. Making Larry Fink the most powerful man in AND after the crisis.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 2008 financial crisis, the government bailed out major firms like Bear Stearns and AIG. They hired BlackRock, led by Larry Fink, to manage the cleanup without competitive bidding, shrouded in secrecy. This made Fink a key figure in the bailout process, despite BlackRock being a major shareholder in the banks receiving assistance. As a result, Fink emerged as a powerful influence in the post-bailout economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the 2008 meltdown when the government bailed out too big to fail giants like Bear Stearns, AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac. Who did they hire that analyze and clean up the mess? Another giant financial firm by the name of BlackRock led by a very well connected billionaire by the name of Larry Fink. BlackRock was awarded these key government contracts to help with the meltdown with no competitive bidding while being enveloped in secrecy. Basically, Larry Fink was hired to be the manager of Washington's bailout of Wall Street, even though BlackRock is one of the biggest shareholders in the same banks they were helping to get bailed out, making Larry Fink the most powerful man in the post bailout economy.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

From there BlackRock just kept doing his thing. Using the public's money (yes yours) to expand their dominance. From pension funds, Sovereign wealth funds to other central banks and many others. All count as their clientele. Trillions of dollars under their control.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock's clients include pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, central banks, college endowments, Fortune 500 companies, and millions of individual investors. They are major shareholders in top companies like Apple, Microsoft, and Wells Fargo, managing an impressive $9 trillion. In comparison, the largest 300 pension funds hold $6 trillion collectively, and Vanguard manages $7.1 trillion. Together, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street control about $15 trillion, nearly 70% of the US GDP. Larry Fink has achieved this largely out of the spotlight, with only a few interviews and appearances on CNBC.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, Blackbaud's clients include the retirement accounts of average everyday people in the form of pension funds. They also have sovereign wealth funds as their clients, other central banks, college endowments, fortune 500 companies, and millions of individual investors. They're one of the top shareholders of many of the biggest publicly traded companies like Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and even other major banks like Wells Fargo and Chase. And to put their $9,000,000,000,000 into perspective, the 300 largest pension funds in the world only hold a collective $6,000,000,000,000 Vanguard, the behemoth behind mutual funds and ETFs, trails behind BlackRock with only 7,100,000,000,000 under management. And if you put the big three asset management firms together, BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street, they control a collective $15,000,000,000,000, roughly equivalent to nearly 70% of the US's GDP. And Larry Fink has done all of this largely in the shadows with just a few occasional interviews and appearances on CNBC.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

Fast forward to 2020, the pandemic hit. Another crisis. And guess who the government asked for help AGAIN? Yes exactly - Larry Fink from BlackRock. Making him even MORE powerful while no one really knew what was going on.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage its scheme for buying corporate bonds, effectively bailing out corporations overwhelmed by pandemic-related debt. Notably, BlackRock holds significant stakes in many of these same companies. While the Fed's published list includes 794 companies, the discussion focuses on just the top 10 holdings. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, emerged as a powerful figure in both the post-bailout and post-pandemic economies. Despite his influence, he remains largely unknown to the general public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who did the money printer of the US, the Federal Reserve, hire to manage their scheme to buy corporate bonds? Basically, they were bailing out corporations that had too much debt to withstand the pandemic. You guessed it. They went right back to BlackRock. Even though, again, the same corporations BlackRock was helping to bail out were the same corporations that they own some of the biggest stakes in. Speaker 1: Keep in mind, though, these are just the top 10 holdings. The whole list, which the Fed has published on the New York Fed website, includes 794 companies. So, yes, these are just the top 10 by holdings, but there are hundreds of other companies that could be part of the Fed's portfolio as well. Speaker 0: Larry Fink was the most powerful man in the post bailout economy, and now he's arguably one of the most powerful men in the post pandemic economy as well. And yet despite all his considerable power, the general public has practically never heard of Larry Fink.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

Larry Fink wasn't born into his power though. He started like any other ‘average’ guy. The difference? His mindset wasn't average at all. “Larry is obsessed with having control” so the people close to him. He proved his skills in Wall Street and from there it went upwards…

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

Quickly, Larry became a legend who was responsible for making his company over $1B in just a few years. But then he let the foot of the gas and made one mistake casting the company he worked for $100M+ It all crashed literally overnight - including his reputation.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1978, he led a department focused on mortgage-backed bonds, building a loyal team known as Little Israel. His success grew, and by 1983, at just 31, he became the youngest member of First Boston's management committee, co-heading the taxable fixed income division and leading the mortgage and real estate products group. He also started the financial futures and options department, contributing around $1 billion to First Boston's profits. However, by 1986, his success took a downturn when he lost $100 million in the second quarter of that year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1978, he was running his own department, which was mainly focused on training mortgage backed bonds. The team he built around him mostly consisted of Jews and were nicknamed Little Israel. They worked hard and were ruthlessly loyal to him. As Larry's success grew, so did his ego. By 1983, at the age of 31, he became the youngest member of First Boston's management committee, co head of the taxable fixed income division, head of the mortgage and real estate products group, and started the financial futures and options department. All of this enabled Larry to contribute an estimated $1,000,000,000 to First Boston's bottom line. But by 1986, all that success would come crashing down. And in the Q2 of that year, he lost $100,000,000.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

If you think that was his end, then think again. Together with his newly found billionaire business partner he founded BlackStone. An asset manager they quickly scaled. But it came to an argument between them which led Larry to found BlackRock. Well the rest is history…

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

Now the cherry on the top: BlackRock's software is called Aladdin. With a network of 5000+ computers it's able to track the market and make risk analysis. Essentially, that shit predicts the future astonishingly accurately. BlackRock is always 2 steps ahead.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I asked about AI, and he mentioned that the public only sees a fraction of its capabilities. Most of the powerful technology is kept under wraps, which is concerning. For instance, BlackRock uses an AI called Aladdin for forecasting, developed over several years. This model outperforms all other software and human predictions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I asked him the same question, what do you think about AI? And he's like, dude, you have no idea. If you think what they released in the public is the actual stuff, they've just they gatekeep 99.9% of stuff. So the amount of power that's already out there, it is scary. And if you look at, for example, BlackRock, BlackRock uses an AI called Aladdin to do forecasting predictions. And they've had this model being developed over the last several years, and that beats and trumps every other software and automation and any other person has blame for it.

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

This isn’t a random conspiracy theory from Tik Tok. You can literally do your research on Yahoo Finance. But all of this - the truth - is extremely important to know. You DON’T want to go through life without knowing who runs all of this. And the rabbit hole goes deeper...

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

That's it! Want more? Then don't forget to: 1. RT the first post 2. Comment and like 3 Follow @ManuelsJourney1 Talk soon

@ManuelsJourney1 - Manuel

Sub for FREE if you want to learn how to scale companies to $1M+ profits: (no gatekeeping) https://manuels-sales-newsletter.beehiiv.com/subscribe

Manny's G letter Get weekly insights into how to increase your sales revenue based on 2+ years experience in the field. manuels-sales-newsletter.beehiiv.com
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 8:36 PM

@yourclipss - CLIPS

@HustleBitch_ Blackrock is owned by the ashkenazi kazarian jesuit mafia. https://t.co/bNcffAb1rb

Video Transcript AI Summary
In discussing the CDC's response to COVID, various officials are mentioned, highlighting their dual citizenship with Israel. This includes CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, Deputy Director Anne Shoalje, Chief of Staff Sherry Berger, and others, all identified as Jewish. The COVID czar, Jeff Zaintz, and senior adviser Andy Slavitt are also noted, along with Rachel Levine, the assistant secretary for health. The conversation extends to key figures in pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna, emphasizing their similar backgrounds. The speaker expresses frustration over perceived control by these individuals and organizations, prompting interruptions from others present.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In charge of the CDC that was controlling and telling our government to shut down small businesses and what they recommend for the mandates and the vaccine and Pfizer and all. At the time when COVID was being enacted, I'm gonna read off the staff of who's in charge of this in, CDC. The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anne Shoalje, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC chief medical officer, Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, CDC director of the Washington office. I'm gonna This is this is pertinent to the topic. We're talking about COVID. Right? This Yeah. This is this is pertinent to COVID, so I love you, Jennifer. Thank you, Pam. Yeah. Please. So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Resick, dual citizenship with Israel, Ju. COVID czar, Jeff Zaintz, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. COVID senior adviser, Andy Slavitt, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Ho, assistant of health secretary for human services for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender dual citizenship with Israel s Jew. Speaker 1: I ask that you hold off Christopher. Speaker 0: Ma'am, I'm almost done. Mister Head Speaker 2: of Firewood, the the chair has ruled that your comments are out of order. She's asked you to stop. Speaker 0: How is it Speaker 1: out of order? The chair has You said Jew. There is nothing wrong with Jew. It's not in wrong with Speaker 0: dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Pfizer chief scientist, Michael Speaker 1: Dostin, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Speaker 0: Moderna chief scientist, Paul Zacks, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. BlackRock everyone know BlackRock? BlackRock CEO, Larry Faith, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation, and our lives. Yes, ma'am. And I love you, and I appreciate your patience. BlackRock president, Rob Capitaw, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson and Johnson joined Wall Walter Schrecker dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Chief medical officer of done. Michael Rosen also. Advisor of the World Economic Speaker 1: Christopher, you need to stop. Speaker 0: About losing control of of the media or the bank. Go on. God bless you. Thank you for your Speaker 1: Christopher, you need to stop. Speaker 0: Losing control.
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 2:18 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"Now we know that BlackRock are in the top 3 shareholders of every corporation." Can anyone stop them from owning the world? https://t.co/tI0chFdXUO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered the ownership structure of BlackRock, which is a major shareholder in many corporations. While Larry Fink founded BlackRock, he doesn't control it. The real control comes from Merrill Lynch, which owns 45% of BlackRock, but this isn't reflected in the top institutional shareholders list. Merrill Lynch is part of Bank of America, which was acquired during the 2008 financial crisis. Warren Buffett, through Berkshire Hathaway, is the top shareholder of Bank of America. Interestingly, despite owning a significant portion of BlackRock, neither Merrill Lynch nor Bank of America has representatives on BlackRock's board. This raises questions about their influence and governance. If anyone has insights into this unusual situation, I’d appreciate the information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I found out who actually owns BlackRock, but there's something really weird about it. Because by now we know that BlackRock is in the top three shareholders of basically every corporation in America and beyond. And they do this using our money in things like retirement accounts, pension funds, IRAs, chain traded funds, mutual funds. But most people don't actually know who owns and controls BlackRock. We all know that it was founded by Larry Fink, and he's the face of the company, but he does not control it. When you try to find out who does control it, you'll usually find this list, which is the top institutional shareholders. Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street are right at the top just like every other company, but this is not the whole story. Because if you dig deep enough, you'll find out that actually Merrill Lynch owns 45% of BlackRock, and they're considered an insider. So they don't show up on the top institutional holders list. This merger took place in 2,006. So actually, Merrill Lynch controls BlackRock in a big way. But who controls Merrill Lynch? Well, Merrill Lynch is actually a division of Bank of America, because Bank of America bought them out during the 08 financial collapse. So who owns bank of America? Well, nowadays, Warren Buffett is the top shareholder of bank America because he owns Berkshire Hathaway, which is his billionaire investment firm. I'm still not sure what this top one is, the 25%. That's an anomaly, and I cannot corroborate what those shares are, but I found these shares. This is a screenshot from Berkshire Hathaway's 13 f where they tell you all the things they hold. And I totaled up all of these Bank of America shares, and it equals 1,000,000,000 32,000,000 shares. That's 13% of bank of America shares equal to $33,000,000,000 But I also dug in a little bit into where bank of America came from and who founded them. And all modern banks are crazy histories of mergers and acquisitions and banks changing their names and merging with other banks probably for no particular reason. But bank of America traces its roots back in 2 different directions, one of which we're not gonna talk about, and the other one is back to this Italian dude named our Amadeo Giannini, who acquired what was then called Banca de America D'Italia. Sorry for that accent. Over the years, it changed his name to Bank of America. And then in the biggest merger in history, merge with Charlotte based Nation Bank in 1990, what, 1998. So I just thought it was interesting that half of the lineage of Bank of America was founded by this Italian dude that got really into Italian banking back in the early 1900, you know, when, like, there was a certain Italian organization that was doing a lot of things with money back then. I'm sure it was all above board though. I'm, you know, like, obviously. But anyways, back to the weird thing that I can't figure out. Bank of America owns Merrill Lynch, who owns the vast majority of BlackRock, but they don't have anyone on the board as far as I can tell. Usually, the biggest shareholders of a company have representatives on the board that sort of represent their investment. But I've just shown you the whole board of directors of BlackRock, and none of them have any real ties to Merrill Lynch or Bank of America, which seems pretty weird when you own almost half the company to not have any board members. The plot thickens. So two things, if you wanna follow the history of Bank of America down the other trail, you might wind up at a certain family name that you aren't aware of that is really hard to find on the Internet. That'll probably get videos taken down. Total conspiracy theories. And the other thing is if anyone knows more than me or is literate in this or has info about why Merrill Lynch and Bank of America have no representatives on the board of BlackRock. I would love to know. After all, why would you own half of a company and then have no say in what that company is doing? Or how do they have a say? What what's the story here?
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:49 PM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

BlackRock is on track to own almost everything. But who owns BlackRock?

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 9:02 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

BlackRock is on the path to owning the world. https://t.co/optGvcrmFd

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, founded in 1988 by Larry Fink, rose to dominance after the 2008 financial crisis, advising entities like AIG and the Federal Reserve. Fink, who previously created the subprime mortgage market, was seen as a savior during the crisis. BlackRock executives have since moved into government positions, influencing policy. In 2019, BlackRock proposed a "going direct" monetary policy, bypassing traditional interest rate channels. This plan was implemented shortly after, with central banks injecting money directly into the economy. BlackRock also managed bailout programs, benefiting its own iShares ETFs. BlackRock's Aladdin software, used by numerous institutions, manages trillions in assets. The company is increasingly using AI and algorithms for investment decisions. Fink's annual letters to CEOs push the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) agenda, influencing corporate behavior. BlackRock is leveraging its power to shape the corporate world and promote digital currencies. Some US states are divesting from BlackRock due to its ESG agenda. While protests have occurred, they often focus on greenwashing rather than the broader agenda. The question remains: who owns BlackRock?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Let's play a little game. Let's imagine you're JoQ normie, and you need to run out for some groceries. You hop in the car and head to the store. What store do you go to? Why, Walmart, of course. And being an unwitting victim of the sugar conspiracy, what do you buy when you're there? Coke, naturally. And you can get jabbed at Walmart these days, right? Well, then you might as well make sure to get your sixth Moderna booster while you're there. And don't forget to fill up with gas on your way home. Is this creeping you out? Then why don't you shut yourself in your house and never go out shopping again? That'll show them. After all, you can always order everything you need from Amazon, can't you? Are you noticing a pattern here? Yes, in case you haven't heard, BlackRock Inc. Is now officially everywhere. It owns everything. Sadly for us, however, the creepy corporate claws of the BlackRock beast aren't content simply to clutch onto a near plurality of the shares of every major corporation in the world. No. BlackRock is now digging its talons in even further and flexing its muscles, putting that inconceivable wealth and influence to use by completely reordering the economy, creating scandemics, and shaping the course of civilization in the process. Let's face it, if you're not concerned about the power BlackRock wields over the world by this point, then you're not paying attention. But don't worry if all of this is news to you. Most people have no idea where this investment giant came from, how it clawed its way to the top of the Wall Street dogpile, or what it has planned for your future. Let's fill in that gap in public understanding. I'm James Corbett of the Corbett Report, and today you're going to learn the story of how BlackRock conquered the world. Hold on a second, I hear you interject. I've got this. BlackRock was founded as a mergers and acquisitions firm in 1985 by a couple of ex lemanites and has since gone on to become the world's largest alternative investment firm, right? Wrong. That's Blackstone Inc, currently headed by Steven Schwartzman. But don't feel bad if you confuse the two. The BlackstoneBlackRock confusion was done on purpose. In fact, BlackRock began in 1988 as a business proposal by investment banker Larry Fink in a gaggle of business partners. The appropriately named Fink had managed to lose $100,000,000 in a single quarter in 1986 as a manager at First Boston Investment Bank by betting the wrong way on interest rates. Humbled by this humiliating setback Fink turned lemons into lemonade by crafting a vision for an investment firm with an emphasis on risk management. Never again would Larry Fink be caught off guard by a market downturn. Fink assembled some partners and brought his proposal to Blackstone co founders Pete Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman, who liked the idea so much that they agreed to extend Fink a $5,000,000 line of credit in exchange for a 50% share in the business. Originally named Blackstone Financial Management, Fink's operation was turning a nice profit within months, had quadrupled the value of its assets in one year, and had grown the value of its portfolio under management to $17,000,000,000 by 1992. Now firmly established as a viable business in its own right, Schwarzman and Fink began musing about spinning the firm off from Blackstone and taking it public. Schwarzman suggested giving the newly independent company a name with black in it as a nod to its Blackstone origins, and Fink, taking roguish delight in the inevitable confusion and annoyance such a move would cause, proposed the name BlackRock. Speaker 1: So Larry and I were sitting down, and and he he said, what what do you think about, you know, sort of having a family name, you know BlackRock. With black in it. And I I said, that that's a that's I think that's a good idea. And I think it was they put on the table either black pebble or or or or black rock. And and so so he said, you know, if we do something like this, all of our people will kill us. Speaker 0: The two evidently share the same sense of humor. There is a little confusion between the companies, Schwartzman now concedes, and every time that happens, I get a real chuckle. But a shared taste causing confusion was not enough to keep the partners together. By 1994, the two had fallen out over compensation for new hires or perhaps due to distress over Schwarzman's ongoing divorce, depending who's telling the story and Schwarzman sold Blackstone's holdings in BlackRock for a mere $240,000,000. That was certainly a heroic mistake, Schwartzman admits. Having made the split with Blackstone and established BlackRock as its own entity, Think was firmly on the path that would lead to his company becoming the globe bestriding financial colossus that it is today. In 1999, with its assets under management standing at $165,000,000,000 BlackRock went public on the New York Stock Exchange at $14 per share. Expanding its services into analytics and risk management with its proprietary Aladdin Enterprise Investment System more on which later The firm acquired mutual fund company State Street Research and Management in 02/2004, merged with Merrill Lynch Investment Management in 02/2006, and bought Seattle based Quellos Group's Fund of Hedge Funds business in 02/2007, bringing the total value of assets under BlackRock management to over $1,000,000,000,000. But it was the global financial crisis of '2 thousand and seven-two thousand and '8 that catapulted BlackRock to its current position of financial dominance. Just ask Heikki Buchter, the German correspondent who literally wrote the book on BlackRock. Prior to the financial crisis, I was not even familiar with the name. But in the years after the Lehman Brothers collapse in 02/2008, BlackRock appeared everywhere. Everywhere, Buchter told German news outlet DW in 2015. Even before the Bear Stearns fiasco materialized into the Lehman Brothers collapse and the full on financial bloodbath of September 2008, Wall Street was collectively turning to BlackRock for help. AIG, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had all hired the firm to comb through their spiraling mess of credit obligations in the months before the meltdown. BlackRock was perceived to be the only firm that could sort through the dizzying math behind the complicated debt swaps and exotic financial instruments underlying the tottering financial system, and many Wall Street kingpins had think on speed dial as panic began to grip the markets. I think of it like Ghostbusters. When you have a problem, who are going to call? BlackRock, UBS managing director Terrence Kealy told CNN at the time. And why wouldn't they trust Fink to pick through the mess of the subprime mortgage meltdown? After all, he was the one who helped launch the whole toxic subprime mortgage industry in the first place. Oh, did I forget to mention that? Remember the whole losing his job because he lost $100,000,000 for First Boston in 1986 thing? That came just three years after Fink had made billions for the bank's customers by constructing his first Collateralized Mortgage Obligation and almost single handedly created the subprime mortgage market that would fail so spectacularly in 02/2008. Speaker 2: Started First Boston in 1976. I was the first Freddie Mac bond trader. And so the mortgage market was just in its infancy. And then in 1982, we had the ability to put a PC on our trading desk. Before that, you had no ability to put a computer on our trading desk. And it was very clear to me that if we could have computing power on the trading desk, we were going to have the ability to dissect cash flows of mortgages. That led in 1983 to the first carving up a mortgage into different tranches, and so we created the first CMO. Speaker 0: So, how you look at it, Fink was either the perfect guy to have in charge of sorting out the mess that his CMO monstrosity had created, or the first Fink who should have gone to jail for it. Guess which way the US government chose to see it? Yeah, you guessed right. They saw Fink as their savior, of course. Specifically, the US government turned to BlackRock for help, with beleaguered US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner personally consulting Larry Fink no less than 49 times over the course of the eighteen month crisis. Lest there be any doubt who was calling the shots in that relationship, when Geithner was on the ropes and his position as Secretary of the Treasury was in jeopardy at the end of Obama's first term, Fink's name was on the shortlist of those who were being considered to replace him. The Federal Reserve, too, put its faith in BlackRock, turning to the company for assistance in administering the 2,008 bailouts. Ultimately, BlackRock ended up playing a role in the $30,000,000,000 financing of the sale of Bear Stearns to JPMorgan, the $180,000,000,000 bailout of AIG, and the $45,000,000,000 rescue of Citigroup. When the dust finally settled on Wall Street after the Lehman Brothers collapse, there was little doubt who was sitting on top of the dust pile: BlackRock. The only question was how they would parlay their growing wealth and financial clout into real world political power. For Fink, the answer was obvious: move from the petty crime of high finance into the criminal big leagues of government. Accordingly, throughout the last decade, he has spent his time building up BlackRock's political influence until it has become, as even Bloomberg admits, the de facto fourth branch of government. When BlackRock executives managed to get their hands on a confidential Federal Reserve PowerPoint presentation threatening to subject BlackRock to the same regulatory regime as the big banks, the Wall Street behemoth spent millions successfully lobbying the government to drop the proposal. But lobbying the government is a roundabout way to get what you want. As any good financial guru will tell you, it's far more cost efficient to make sure that no troublesome regulations are imposed in the first place. Perhaps that's why Fink has been collecting powerful politicians for years now, scooping them up as consultants, advisers, and board members so that he can ensure BlackRock has a key agent at the heart of any important political event. As William Engdahl details in his own expose of BlackRock, founder and CEO Larry Fink is clearly interested in buying influence globally. He made former German CDU MP Friedrich Mertz head of BlackRock Germany when it looked as if he might succeed Chancellor Merkel and former British Chancellor of Exchequer George Osborne as a political consultant. Fink named former Hillary Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills to the BlackRock board when it seemed certain Hillary would soon be in the White House. He has named former central bankers to his board and gone on to secure lucrative contracts with their former institutions. Stanley Fisher, former head of the Bank of Israel and also later vice chairman of the Federal Reserve, is now senior advisor at BlackRock. Philip Hildebrand, former Swiss National Bank president, is vice chairman at BlackRock, where he oversees the BlackRock Investment Institute. Jean Boisvin, the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada, is the global head of research at BlackRock's Investment Institute. And it doesn't end there. When it came time for Biden's handlers to appoint the director of the National Economic Council, responsible for the coordination of policymaking on both domestic and international economic issues, naturally they turned to Brian Dees, the former global head of sustainable investing at BlackRock Inc. And the rest, as they say, is history. Or, more accurately, is the present, because when we peel back the layers of propaganda from the past three years, we find that the remarkable events of this scandemic have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with a virus. We are instead witnessing a changeover in the monetary and economic system that was conceived, proposed, and then implemented by, you guessed it, BlackRock. Historians of the future will no doubt note 2019 as the year that BlackRock began its takeover of the planet in earnest. It was in January of that fateful year that Joe Biden crawled cap in hand to Larry Wall Street office to seek the financial titan's blessing for his presidential selection. I'm here to help, Fink reportedly replied. Then, on August twenty second of twenty nineteen, Larry Fink joined such illustrious figures as Al Climate Conman Gore, Christia, Account Freezing Freeland, Mark G. Fans Carney, and the man himself, Klaus Bonvillain Schwab, on the World Economic Forum's Board of Trustees, an organization which, the WEF informs us, serves as the guardian of the World Economic Forum's mission and values. But which values are those, precisely, you might ask. And what does Yo Yo Ma have to do with it? It was another event that took place on 08/22/2019, however, that captures our attention today. As it turns out, August 22 was not only the date that Fink achieved his globalist knighthood on the WEF board, it was also the date that the financial coup d'etat, later erroneously referred to as a pandemic, actually began. In order to understand what happened that day, however, we need to take a moment to understand the structure of The US monetary system. You see, greatly oversimplifying things for ease of understanding, there are actually two types of money in the banking system. There's bank money, the money that you and I use to transact in the real economy, and there's reserve money, the money that banks keep on deposit at the Federal Reserve. These two types of money circulate in two separate monetary circuits, sometimes referred to as the retail circuit and the wholesale circuit In order to get a handle on what this actually means, I highly suggest you check out John Titus' indispensable videos on the subject, notably, Where Does Money Come From? And Wherefore Art Thou Reserves, and Larry and Carsten's Excellent Pandemic, where he explains the split circuit monetary system. Speaker 3: So here we have split circuit monetary system, and on the left, we have the public circuit where I'm gonna simplify the diagram. It's the Federal Reserve issuing money to commercial banks, and it is circling back to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve might buy an asset from a commercial bank, which turns around, sells it back to the Fed. That's a basic stripped down circuit. The retail circuit on the right in red, the commercial banks are issuing money. Again, I'm going to simplify this. They issue money to you and me. They issue it in the form of loans. We pay the money back, and the cycle begins anew. And that's really the system. I wanted to do this diagram, though, because you could see here in the center of the diagram, the commercial banks occupy a special position in the two tiered split circuit monetary system. They are both issuers and users of money in the center here. So you could really draw a box around them. Now you and I in the retail circuit, we keep our money on deposit at the commercial banks, which in turn keep their money on deposit at the Fed. So there you have two different systems of deposits. Speaker 0: But the point of the two circuit system is that historically speaking, the Federal Reserve was never able to print money in the sense that people usually understand that term. It's able to create reserve money, which banks can keep on deposit with the Fed to meet their capital requirements. The more reserves they have parked at the Fed, the more bank money they're allowed to conjure into existence and lend out into the real economy. The gap between Fed created reserve money and bank created bank money acts as a type of circuit breaker, and this is why the flood of reserve money that the Fed created in the wake of the global financial crisis of two thousand and eight did not result in a spike in commercial bank deposits. But all that changed three years ago. As Titus observes, by the time of the scandemic bailouts of twenty twenty, the amount of bank money sitting in deposit in commercial banks in The US, a figure which had never shown any correlation with total amount of reserves held on deposit at the Fed, suddenly spiked in lockstep with the Fed's climbing balance sheet. Clearly, something had happened between the 02/2008 bailout and the 2020 bailout. Whereas the tidal wave of reserve money unleashed to capitalize the banks in the earlier bailout hadn't found its way into the real economy, the 2020 bailout money had. So, what happened? BlackRock happened. That's what. Specifically, on 08/15/2019, BlackRock published a report under the typically eye wateringly boring title, Dealing with the From Unconventional Monetary policy to unprecedented policy coordination. Although the paper did not catch the attention of the general public, it did generate some press in the financial media and, much more to the point, generated interest from the gaggle of central bankers who descended on Jackson Hole, Wyoming for the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium taking place on August 2239, the exact same day that Fink was being appointed to the WEF's board. The theme of the twenty nineteen symposium, which brings together central bankers, policymakers, economists, academics to discuss economic issues and policy options, was challenges for monetary policy. And BlackRock's paper, published a week in advance of the event, was carefully crafted to set the parameters of the discussion. It's no surprise that the report caught the attention of the central bankers. After all, BlackRock's proposal came with a pedigree. Of the four co authors of the report, three of them were former central bankers themselves, as we've seen Philip Hildebrand, the former president of the Swiss National Bank Stanley Fischer, the former Federal Reserve vice chairman and former governor of the Bank of Israel and Jean Boisin, the former deputy governor of the Bank of Canada. But beyond the paper's authorship, it was what dealing with the next downturn actually proposed that was to have such earth shaking effects on the global monetary order. The report starts by noting the dilemma that the central bankers found themselves in by 2019. After years of quantitative easing and ZERP and even the once unthinkable NERP the banksters were running out of room to operate. As BlackRock notes, the current policy space for global central banks is limited and will not be enough to respond to a significant, let alone a dramatic, downturn. Conventional and unconventional monetary policy works primarily through the stimulative impact of lower short term and long term interest rates. This channel is almost tapped out. One third of the developed market government bond and investment grade universe now has negative yields, and global bond yields are closing in on their potential floor. Further support cannot rely on interest rates falling. So, what was BlackRock's answer to this conundrum? Why, a great reset, of course. No, not Claus Schwab's great reset. A different type of great reset. The going direct reset. An unprecedented response is needed when monetary policy is exhausted and fiscal policy alone is not enough. That response will likely involve going direct. Going direct means the central bank finding ways to central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders. Going direct, which can be organized in a variety of different ways, works by: one, bypassing the interest rate channel when this traditional central bank toolkit is exhausted and two, enforcing policy coordination so that the fiscal expansion does not lead to an offsetting increase in interest rates. The authors of BlackRock's proposal go on to stress that they're not talking about simply dumping money into people's bank accounts willy nilly. As Report co author Philip Hildebrand made sure to stress in his appearance on Bloomberg on the day of the paper's release, this was not Bernanke's helicopter money idea. Speaker 4: So what we're proposing is the next step has to be something else than just more of the same, something that goes into the direction of essentially what we call go and direct, which would be ways of putting money into into pockets of consumers or corporates directly in order to spend. So to go around the interest rate channel as opposed to traditional central banking where you really only, or always work through the interest rate channel. Speaker 0: So kinda like helicopter money. Does it have to be coordinated? Speaker 4: I think what it means, helicopter money is a sort of catchphrase from the famous paper that Ben Bernanke gave in the early two thousands. But the point is, yes, you have to go in a different way than working through the interest rate channel because interest rates are already so low. Speaker 0: Nor was it, as report co author Jean Bois Van was keen to stress in his January 2020 appearance on BlackRock's own podcast discussing the idea, a version of modern monetary theory with the government simply printing up bank money to spend directly into the economy. No. This was to be a process where special purpose facilities, which they called standing emergency fiscal facilities would be created to inject bank money directly into the commercial accounts of various public or private sector entities. These SEFFs would be overseen by the central bankers themselves, thus crossing the streams of the two monetary circuits in a way that had never been done before. Any additional measures to stimulate economic growth will have to go beyond the interest rate channel and go direct, with the central bank crediting private or public sector accounts directly with money. One way or another, this will mean subsidizing spending, and such a measure would be fiscal rather than monetary by design. This can be done directly through fiscal policy or by expanding the monetary policy toolkit with an instrument that will be fiscal in nature, such as credit easing by way of buying equities. This implies that an effective stimulus would require coordination between monetary and fiscal policy, be it implicitly or explicitly. Alright, let's recap. On August 1539, BlackRock came out with a proposal calling for central banks to adopt a completely unprecedented procedure for injecting money directly into the economy in the event of the next downturn. Then, on 08/22/2019, the Central Bankers of the World convened in Wyoming for their annual shindig to discuss these very ideas. So, did the central bankers listen to BlackRock? You bet they did. Remember when we saw how commercial bank deposits began moving in sync with the Fed's balance sheet for the first time ever? Let's take another look at that, shall we? It wasn't the March 2020 bailouts where the correlation between the Fed balance sheet and commercial bank deposits, the telltale sign of a BlackRock style going direct bailout, began. It was actually in September 2019, months before this pandemic was a gleam in Bill Gates' eye, when we started to see Federal Reserve monetary creation finding its way directly into the retail monetary circuit. In other words, it was less than one month after BlackRock proposed this revolutionary new type of fiscal intervention that the central banks began implementing that very idea. The going direct reset, better understood as a financial coup d'etat, had begun. To be sure, this going direct intervention was later offset by Fed's next scam for forcing more government debt on depositors, but that's another story. The point is that the seal had been broken on the going direct bottle, and it wasn't long before the central bankers had a perfect excuse for forcing that entire bottle down the public's throat. What we were told was a pandemic was in fact, on the financial level, just an excuse for an absolutely unprecedented pumping of trillions of dollars from the Fed directly into the economy. The story of precisely how the going direct reset was implemented during the twenty twenty bailouts is a fascinating one, and I would encourage you to dive down that rabbit hole if you're interested. But for today's purposes, it's sufficient to understand what the central bankers got out of the going direct reset. The ability to take over fiscal policy and to begin engineering the economy of Main Street in a more, well, direct way. But what did BlackRock get out of this, you ask? Well, when it came time to decide who to call in to manage this scandemic bailout scheme, guess who the Fed turned to? If you guessed BlackRock, then sadly, you're exactly right. Yes, in March 2020, the Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage three separate bailout programs: its commercial mortgage backed securities program, its purchases of newly issued corporate bonds, and its purchases of existing investment grade bonds and credit ETFs. To be sure, this bailout bonanza wasn't just another excuse for BlackRock to gain access to the government purse and distribute funds to businesses in its own portfolio, though it certainly was that. It was also a convenient excuse for BlackRock to bail out one of its own most valuable assets: iShares, the collection of exchange traded funds that it acquired from Barclays for $13,500,000,000 in 02/2009 and that had ballooned to a $1,900,000,000,000 juggernaut by 2020. As Pam and Russ Martins, who've been on the BlackRock beat at their Wall Street on Parade blog for years now, detailed in their article on the subject, is bailing out its ETFs with Fed money and taxpayers eating losses. BlackRock is being allowed by the Fed to buy its own corporate bond ETFs as part of the Fed program to prop up the corporate bond market. According to a report in Institutional Investor on Monday, BlackRock, on behalf of the Fed, bought $1,580,000,000 in investment grade and high yield ETFs from May 12 to May 19, with BlackRock's iShares funds representing 48% of the $1,307,000,000 market value at the end of that period, ETFGI said in a May 30 report. No bid contracts and buying up your own products? What could possibly be wrong with that? The numbers speak for themselves. After BlackRock was allowed to bail out its own ETF funds with the Fed's newly minted going direct funny money, iShares surged yet again, surpassing $3,000,000,000,000 in assets under management last year. But it wasn't just the Fed that was rolling out the red carpet for BlackRock to implement the very bailout plan that BlackRock created. Bankers from around the world were positively falling over themselves to get Rock to manage their market interventions. In April 2020, the Bank of Canada announced that it was hiring who else? Black Rock's Financial Markets Advisory to help manage its own $10,000,000,000 corporate bond buying program. Then, in May 2020, the Swedish central bank, the Riksbank, also hired BlackRock as an external consultant to conduct an analysis of the Swedish corporate bonds market and an assessment of possible design options for a potential corporate bonds asset purchase program. As we saw earlier, the global financial crisis had put BlackRock on the map, establishing the firm's dominance on the world stage and catapulting Larry Fink to the status of Wall Street royalty. With the 2020 going direct reset, however, BlackRock had truly conquered the world. It was now dictating central bank interventions and then acting in every conceivable role and in direct violation of conflict of interest rules, acting as consultant and advisor, as manager, as buyer, as seller, and as investor with both the Fed and the very banks, corporations, pension funds, and other entities it was bailing out. Yes, with the advent of this scandemic, BlackRock had cemented its position as the company that owns the world. But, yet again, we are left with the same nagging question: What is BlackRock seeking to do with this power? What is it capable of doing? And what are the aims of Fink and his fellow travelers? Let's find out. As you now know, BlackRock started out life as Blackstone Financial Management in the offices of the Blackstone Group in 1988. By 1992, it was already so successful that founder Larry Fink and Blackstone CEO Steven Schwartzman spun the company off as its own entity, christening it Black Rock in a deliberate attempt to sow confusion. But it was in 1993 that arguably the most important of BlackRock's market controlling tools was forged. It was that year that Jody Kochansky, a fixed income portfolio manager hired the year began to tire of his daily 06:30 a. M. Task of comparing his entire portfolio to yesterday's numbers. The task, done by hand from paper printouts, was long and arduous. Kochansky had a better We said, 'Let's take this data, and rather than print it out, let's sort it into a database and have the computer compare the report today versus the report yesterday across every position.' It may seem obvious to us today, but in 1993, the idea of automating a task like this was a radical one. Nonetheless, it paid off. After seeing the utility of having an automated, daily, computer generated report calculating risk on every asset in a portfolio, Kochansky and his team hunkered down for a seventy two hour code writing exercise that resulted in Aladdin, short for Asset Liability Debt and Derivative Investment Network, a proprietary investment analysis technology touted as the operating system for BlackRock. Sold as a central processing system for investment management, the software is now the core of BlackRock Solutions, a BlackRock subsidiary that licenses Aladdin to corporate clients and institutional investors. Aladdin combines portfolio management and trading, compliance, operations, and risk oversight in a single platform and is now used by over 200 institutions, including fund manager rivals Vanguard and State Street, half of the top 10 insurers in the world, big tech giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet, and numerous pension funds, including the world's largest, the $1,500,000,000,000 Japanese government pension insurance fund. The numbers themselves tell the story of Aladdin. It's used by 13,000 BlackRock employees and thousands of BlackRock customers. It occupies three data centers in The US, with BlackRock planning to open two more in Europe. It runs 1000s of Monte Carlo simulations computational algorithms that model the probability of various outcomes in chaotic systems every day on each one of the tens of millions of securities under its purview. And, by February 2017, Aladdin was managing risk for $20,000,000,000,000 worth of assets. That's when BlackRock stopped reporting this figure since, as the company told the Financial Times, total assets do not reflect how clients use the system. An anonymous source in the company had a different take. The figure is no longer disclosed because of the negative attention the enormous sums attracted. In this case, the phrase enormous sums almost fails to do justice to the truly mind boggling wealth under the watchful eye of this computer system. As the Financial Times went on to report, the combination of the scores of new clients using Aladdin in recent years and the growth in stock and bond markets in that time has meant that the total value of assets under the systems management is much larger than the $20,000,000,000,000 reported in 2017. Today, dollars 21,600,000,000,000.0 sits on the platform from just a third of its two forty clients, according to public documents verified with the company's and first hand accounts. For context, that figure, representing the assets of just one third of BlackRock's clientele, itself accounts for 10% of the value of all the stocks and bonds in the world. But if the idea of this amount of the world's assets being under the management of a single company's proprietary computer software concerns you, BlackRock has a message for you: relax. The official line is that Aladdin only calculates risk it doesn't tell asset managers what to buy or sell. Thus, even if there were a stray line of code or a wonky algorithm somewhere deep inside Aladdin's programming getting its investment analysis wrong, the final decision on any given instrument would still come down to human judgment. Needless to say, that's a lie. In 2017, BlackRock unveiled a project to replace underperforming human stock pickers with computer algorithms. Dubbed Monarch, the scheme saw billions of dollars of assets snatched from human control and given to an obscure arm of the BlackRock empire called Systematic Active Equities BlackRock acquired SAE in the same 02/2009 deal that saw it snag iShares from Barclays Global Investor, BGI. As we've already seen, the BGI deal was unbelievably lucrative for BlackRock, with iShares being purchased for $13,500,000,000 in 02/2009 and rising to a $1,900,000,000,000 valuation in 2020. Testifying to BlackRock's commitment to the Machine Over Man Monarch project, Mark Wiseman, global head of active equities at BlackRock, told the Financial Times in 2018: I firmly believe that, if we look back in five to ten years from now, the thing that we most benefited from in the BGI acquisition is actually SAE. Even the New York Times was reporting at the time of the launch of the Monarch operation that Larry Fink had cast his lot with the machines and that BlackRock had laid out an ambitious plan to consolidate a large number of actively managed mutual funds with peers that rely more on algorithms and models to pick stocks. The democratization of information has made it much harder for active management, Fink told the New York Times. We have to change the ecosystem. That means relying more on big data, artificial intelligence, factors, and models within quant and traditional investment strategies. Lest there be any doubt about BlackRock's commitment to this anti human agenda, the company doubled down in 2018 with the creation of AI Labs, which is composed of researchers, data scientists, and engineers and works to develop methods to solve their hardest technical problems and advance the fields of finance and AI. The actual models that SAE uses to pick stocks is hidden behind walls of corporate secrecy, but we do know some details. We know, for instance, that SAE collects over 1,000 market signals on each stock under evaluation, including everything from the obvious statistics you would expect in any quantitative analysis of the equities markets to the more exotic forms of data harvesting possible when complex learning algorithms are connected to the mind boggling amounts of data now available on seemingly everyone and everything. A Harvard MBA student cataloged some of these novel approaches to stock valuation undertaken by the SAE algorithms in a 2018 post on the subject. One of the ways BlackRock is including machine learning in its investment process is by signal combination, in which a model mines data, attempting to learn the relationship between stock returns and various quantitative data. For example, it would analyze web traffic through corporate websites as an indicator of future growth of the company, or would look at the geolocation data from smartphones to predict which retailers are more popular. In doing so, researchers must recalibrate and refine the model to make sure it was adding value and not just rediscovering well known market behaviors already known by fundamental fund managers. Another important machine learning application came when it was combined with natural language processing. In this model, the technology learns in an adaptive way what are the words that can predict future performance of stocks. This model was used on analysis of broker reports and corporate filings, and the technology discovered that CEOs' remarks tend to be generally more positive, so then it started giving more importance to the comments of the CFO or the Q and A portion of conference calls. So, let's recap. We know that BlackRock now manages well in excess of $21,000,000,000,000 of assets with its Aladdin software, making a significant portion of the world's wealth dependent on the calculations of an opaque, proprietary BlackRock operating system. And we know that Fink has cast his lot in with the machines and is increasingly devoted to finding ways to leverage so called artificial intelligence, learning algorithms, and other state of the art technologies to further remove humans from the investment loop. But here's the real question: what is BlackRock actually doing with its all seeing eye of Aladdin and its SAE robo stock pickers and its AI labs? Where are Fink and the gang actually trying to take us with the latest and greatest in cutting edge fintech wizardry? Luckily, we don't exactly need to scribe the tea leaves to find our answer to that question. Larry Fink has been kind enough to write it down for us in black and white. You see, every year since 2012, Fink has taken it upon himself as de facto ruler of the world's wealth to pen an annual letter to CEOs laying out the next steps in his scheme for world domination. I mean, he writes the letter as a fiduciary for our clients who entrust us to manage their assets, to highlight the themes that I believe are vital to driving durable long term returns and to helping them reach their goals. Sometimes referred to as a call to action to corporate leaders, these letters from the man stewarding over a significant chunk of the world's investable assets actually do change corporate behavior. That this is so should be self evident to anyone with two brain cells to rub together, which is precisely why it took a team of researchers months of painstaking study to publish a peer reviewed paper concluding this blindingly obvious portfolio firms are responsive to BlackRock's public engagement efforts. You don't say. So, what is Larry Fink's latest hobby horse, you ask? Why, the ESG scam, of course. That's right, Fink used his 2022 letter to harangue his captive audience of corporate chieftains about the power of capitalism, by which he means the power of capitalism to more perfectly control human behavior in the name of sustainability. It's been two years since I wrote that climate risk is investment risk, and in that short period, we have seen a tectonic shift of capital. Sustainable investments have now reached $4,000,000,000,000. Actions and ambitions towards decarbonization have also increased. This is just the beginning. The tectonic shift towards sustainable investing is still accelerating. Whether it is capital being deployed into new ventures focused on energy innovation or capital transferring from traditional indexes into more customized portfolios and products, we will see more money in motion. Every company and every industry will be transformed by the transition to a net zero world. The question is, will you lead or will you be Stakeholder capitalism is all about delivering long term, durable returns for shareholders, and transparency around your company's planning for a net zero world is an important element of that. But it's just one of many disclosures we and other investors ask companies to make. As stewards of our clients' capital, we ask businesses to demonstrate how they're going to deliver on their responsibility to shareholders, including through sound environmental, social, and governance practices and policies. Yes, to the surprise of absolutely no one, Larry Fink has signed BlackRock on to the multi trillion dollar scam that is Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices and Policies, better known as ESG. For those who don't know about ESG yet, they might want to get up to speed on the topic with my presentation earlier this year on ESG and the Big Oil Conspiracy. Or, they can read the summary of the ESG scam by Ian Davis in his article on the globalization of the commons This will be achieved using stakeholder capitalism metrics. Assets will be rated using ESG benchmarks for sustainable business performance. Any business requiring market finance, perhaps through issuing climate bonds or maybe green bonds for European ventures, will need those bonds to have a healthy ESG rating. A low ESG rating will deter investors, preventing a project or business venture from getting off the ground. A high ESG rating will see investors rush to put their money in projects that are backed by international agreements. In combination, financial initiatives like NACs and ESGs are converting SDGs into market regulations. In other words, ESG is a set of phony baloney metrics that are being cooked up by globalist think tanks and would be ruling councils, like the World Economic Forum, to serve as a type of social credit system for corporations. If corporations fail to toe the line when it comes to globalist policies of the moment, whether that's committing to industry destroying net zero or even absolute zero commitments, or debanking thought criminals, or anything else that may be on the globalist checklist, their ESG rating will take a hit. So what? You may ask. What does an ESG rating have to do with the price of tea in China, and why would any CEO care? The so what here is that, as Fink signals in his latest letter, BlackRock will be putting ESG reporting and compliance in its basket of considerations when choosing which stocks and bonds to invest in and which ones to pass over. And Fink is not alone. There are now two ninety one signatories to the Net Zero Asset Managers Initiative, an international group of asset managers committed to supporting the goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 02/1950 or sooner. They include BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and a slew of other companies collectively managing $66,000,000,000,000 of assets. In plain English, BlackRock and its fellow globalist firms are leveraging their power as asset managers to begin shaping the corporate world in their image and bending corporations to their will. And, in case you were wondering, yes, this is tied into the AI agenda as well. In 2020, BlackRock announced the launch of a new module to its automated Aladdin system, Aladdin Climate. Aladdin Climate is the first software application to offer investors measures of both the physical risk of climate change and the transition risk to a low carbon economy on portfolios with climate adjusted security valuations and risk metrics. Using Aladdin Climate, investors can now analyze climate risk and opportunities at the security level and measure the impact of policy changes, technology, and energy supply on investments. To get a sense of what a world directed by digital overlords at the behest of the ESG agenda might look like, we simply need to turn to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. As Fink wrote in his letter to shareholders earlier this year: Finally, a less discussed aspect of the war is its potential impact on accelerating digital currencies. The war will prompt countries to reevaluate their currency dependencies. Even before the war, several governments were looking to play a more active role in digital currencies and define the regulatory frameworks under which they operate. The US Central Bank, for example, recently launched a study to examine the potential implications of the US digital dollar, A global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international transactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption. Digital currencies can also help bring down costs of cross border payments, for example when expatriate workers send earnings back to their families. As we see increasing interest from our clients, BlackRock is studying digital currencies, stablecoins, and the underlying technologies to understand how they can help us serve our clients. The future of the world, according to BlackRock, is now coming fully into view. It is a world in which unaccountable computer learning algorithms automatically direct investments of the world's largest institutions into the coffers of those who play ball with the demands of Fink and his fellow travelers. It's a world in which transactions will be increasingly digital, with every transaction being data mined for the financial benefits of the algorithmic overlords at BlackRock. And it's a world in which corporations that refuse to go along with the agenda will be ESG deranked into oblivion, and individuals who present resistance will have their CBDC wallets shut off. The transition of BlackRock from a mere investment firm into a financial, political, and technological colossus that has the power to direct the course of human civilization is almost complete. Speaker 3: Meet Serge Varley, a recruiter at BlackRock. Speaker 0: Let me tell you, it's not the who's the person who's who's who's controlling the the wallet. So it's it's the And who's that? The hedge funds, BlackRock, the banks. These guys campaign financing. Yep. You can buy your candidates. And, obviously, we have the system in place. First, there's the senate. And this guy's fucking cheap. You got $10 you can buy. So I could give you 500 k right now. No questions asked. Yeah. I didn't do it. Needs to be done. Does, like, everybody do that? Does Blackhawk do that? It doesn't matter who wins. They're still in. They're they're in my pocket. Exploration of this world conquering juggernaut is, there is a ray of hope on the horizon. The public is at least finally becoming aware of the existence of BlackRock and its relative importance on the global financial stage. This is reflected in an increasing number of protests targeting BlackRock and its activities. Keen eyed observers may note, however, that these protests are not against the BlackRock agenda that I've been laying out here. On the contrary, they are for that agenda. These protesters' main gripe seems to be that Fink and BlackRock are engaged in greenwashing and that the megacorporation is actually more interested in its bottom line than in saving Mother Earth. Well, duh. Even BlackRock's former Chief Investment Officer for Sustainable Investing wrote, after leaving the firm, an extensive four part whistleblowing expose documenting how the sustainable investing push being touted by Fink is a scam from top to bottom. My only gripe with this limited hangout critique of BlackRock is that it implies that Fink and his cohorts are merely interested in accumulating dollars. They're not. They're interested in turning their financial wealth into real world power power they will wield in service of their own agenda and will cloak with a phony green mantle because they believe, and not without reason, that that's what the public wants. In the past several months, multiple U. S. State governments have announced their intention to divest state funds from BlackRock, with 19 states' attorneys general even signing a letter to Larry Fink in August of twenty twenty two calling him out on his agenda of social control. As part of this divestment push, the Louisiana state treasurer announced in October that the state was withdrawing $794,000,000 in state funds from BlackRock, South Carolina's state treasurer announced plans to divest $200,000,000 from the company's control by the end of the year, and Arkansas has already taken $125,000,000 out of money market accounts under BlackRock's management. Regardless of the real motivations of these state governments, the fact that they feel compelled to take action against BlackRock is itself a hopeful sign. It means that the political class understands that an increasing portion of the public is aware of the BlackRock ESG corporate governance agenda and is opposed to it. Once again, we arrive at the bottom line. The only thing that truly matters is public awareness of the issues involved in the rise of a financial giant like BlackRock, and it is only general public opinion that can move the needle when it comes to removing the wealth, and thus the power, from a behemoth like the one that Fink has created. But before we wrap up here, there's one last point to be made. You might remember that we opened this exploration by highlighting BlackRock's position as one of the top institutional shareholders in Walmart, and in Coca Cola, and in Moderna, and in Exxon, and in Amazon, and in seemingly every other company of significance on the global stage. Now, the fact checkers will tell you this doesn't actually matter because it's the shareholders who actually own the stock, not BlackRock itself. But that raises a further question: who owns BlackRock? Oh, of course. Now, I realize this is a lot of information to take in at once. Go ahead and rewatch this video once or twice. Follow some of the many links contained herein to better familiarize yourself with this material. Share these reports with others. But if after taking all of this in, you find yourself looking back over these top institutional holders lists and saying, Hey, wait, who's the vanguard group? Well then, I'd say you're starting to get it. Good job. So, who is the Vanguard Group? It's an excellent question and one that I'll be answering in the next edition of the Corporate Report subscriber newsletter. I hope you're there for the answer.
Saved - April 14, 2025 at 4:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the intricate web of ownership and influence surrounding BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager. It operates within a closed loop of major financial institutions, creating a cartel-like control over capital flows. Behind this facade, powerful families and organizations manipulate global finance, shaping policies to their advantage. I delved into metaphysical interpretations, likening BlackRock to a modern-day Demiurge, controlling perception and energy. Ultimately, I emphasized the importance of reclaiming personal awareness and sovereignty to break free from this system.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

🧵 Blackrock, the Demiurge and the Synthetic AI God. Level 1: The Surface (Official Narrative) BlackRock Inc. is a publicly traded company (NYSE: BLK), founded in 1988 by Larry Fink and a team of investors. As of now, it is: •The largest asset manager in the world (over $10 trillion under management) •Managing assets for governments, corporations, pension funds, and central banks •Known for its financial technology platform Aladdin, which tracks and analyzes risk across trillions in global assets Top institutional shareholders include: •Vanguard Group •State Street •Fidelity •Capital Group •And a few other large asset firms But here’s where it starts to spiral…

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 2: The Feedback Loop (Mutual Ownership Web) Vanguard owns a big chunk of BlackRock. BlackRock owns a big chunk of Vanguard. State Street owns shares in both. And all of them own shares in… nearly everything else. This isn’t just coincidence. These companies: •Are the largest shareholders in most Fortune 500 companies •Hold major stakes in Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Energy, Big Media, and Big Ag •Are so intertwined that they effectively form a cartel of ownership, controlling the majority of capital flows on Earth Result: A closed loop of influence, where voting rights, financial power, and corporate control circulate among the same elite institutions.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 3: Behind the Curtain (Hidden Hierarchies) So who owns the owners? This is where names emerge—not always publicly traceable, but historically present: •Rothschilds – Long-time controllers of European central banking and global finance. •Rockefellers – Tied to oil, pharmaceuticals, and the early American financial system. •DuPonts, Morgans, Warburgs, Bushes, Windsors – Interwoven families whose wealth and influence span generations and continents. These families may not hold shares in the conventional sense. Their power is legacy-based: through trusts, foundations, shell companies, and influence over global institutions like: •The World Economic Forum (WEF) •The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) •The IMF and World Bank •And central banks like the Federal Reserve, which, contrary to popular belief, is not fully government-controlled BlackRock is deeply embedded in these institutions, often advising central banks and governments—while simultaneously benefiting from the policies it helps craft.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 4: Esoteric Lens (Energetic and Symbolic Power) From a metaphysical or occult perspective: •BlackRock (the name itself) symbolizes Saturnian energy—order, control, time, gravity, restriction. •It is like the “stone” that rules the material world—black stone, black cube, corporate monolith. •In esoteric thought, the financial system represents the “matrix” of control over human energy (labor), time, and attention. •Those who run it act as modern priesthoods of material power, using algorithms, data, and media to shape perception and behavior globally. Some connect this to ancient cults—Saturn worship, Babylonian banking systems, or even the “Whore of Babylon” archetype of spiritual corruption through material seduction.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 5: The Real Question It’s not just who owns BlackRock. It’s what BlackRock represents: a centralized node in a planetary system of control. •It doesn’t need to own everything—it just needs to manage it. •Ownership becomes irrelevant when you control the flow: of capital, of information, of narrative. •And those who sit behind the scenes—families, networks, councils, orders—they understand this.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 6: The Occult Architecture of Finance The global financial system, as we know it, is a modern ritual structure—a metaphysical machine designed not just to move money, but to: •Direct energy (human labor, time, belief) •Create dependency (through debt, inflation, scarcity) •Control perception (through media, markets, and social status) Think of money not just as currency, but as symbolic energy—a sigil that moves collective intention. •Every dollar is a promise, a spell. •Every market crash is a ritual reset. •Every central bank is a temple of control. The ones who built this system don’t need money—they create it. What they want is your participation in it. Your consent. Your faith.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The red numbers on a social security card designate your body as a stock serial number. Wealthy people are preferred stock, while poor people are common stock. Your body is bought and sold using your birth certificate. The original birth certificate has banks listed on the back because you are a stock in a maritime banking scheme, making money for banks. Corporations and governments create a second “you” in all capital letters to control you. Bills, lawsuits, tickets, driver's licenses, social security cards, and insurance cards use all capital letters for business because the government can only deal with all capital letters. Upper and lower case names cannot be controlled, but signing a contract in all capital letters allows you to be taken to court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The numbers on the back of a social security card in red designate your body. It is the serial number of your stock. And this is why if you're wealthy, are preferred stock. If you're poor, you are common stock, but you are a stock on the stock market. Your body is bought and sold through the use of your birth certificate. And if you could get your original birth certificate back, would find that on the back of the birth certificate are all the banks around the world. All over the world, banks have used your birth certificate because you are a stock in a maritime and multi banking scheme where you make money for banks. So consequently, corporation and government and people who want to control you, they create a second you, and that second you that they control is all capital letters. Check it out. Anytime you get a bill, get a lawsuit, you get a fine ticket, somebody send you a bill from the Department of Water and Power. Check it out on your driver's license, on your Social Security card, on your insurance cards. Anything having to do with business, your name will always be all capital letters because only all capital letters can be dealt with by the government. Anytime you have a name upper and lower case that applies to you, I got no control over you. You sign a contract in which your name is in all capital letters, now I take you to court. Now I can take you.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 7: Saturn – The Black Cube of Control Now we bring in Saturn—the ancient god of time, agriculture, death, and judgment. In modern symbolism: •The black cube = Saturn •The chronos clock = Saturn •The judge in black robes = Saturn •The corporate logo, the cube architecture, the silent control = Saturnian influence BlackRock, Blackstone, Black Cube, etc.—these names aren’t random. They reflect an archetype of control through structure, often cold, efficient, and unfeeling. Saturn rules over: •Time (Chronos) •Law and limitation •Form and density •And in its shadow form: enslavement and control of consciousness In esoteric lore, Saturn once ruled the Golden Age. But after its fall, it became the force of false order, of systematized oppression masked as civilization.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 8: The Matrix of Light Inversion Money. Time. Screens. Algorithms. Metrics. These aren’t neutral tools—they’re filters. Layers between you and raw life. The Matrix, as envisioned in the film, is not far from truth—it’s a light-inversion system, where divine energy is rerouted: •You give your light (attention, labor, spirit) •The system converts it into digital currency •That energy feeds a structure that keeps you disconnected from your essence Who controls that structure? Those who understand frequency, form, and belief manipulation. BlackRock’s AI platform Aladdin watches over trillions of dollars—predicting, analyzing, and ultimately influencing the behavior of markets and people alike. It’s not just a financial tool; it’s a predictive consciousness net.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 9: Revelation, the Beast System & the Whore of Babylon Let’s go biblical. •The Beast: A global system that no one can buy or sell without submitting to (Revelation 13:17). A financial order backed by surveillance, allegiance, and technology. •The Whore of Babylon: A spiritual entity riding the beast—draped in wealth, drunk on the blood of the saints, deceiving nations. •666: The number of man reduced to code, metric, and value. BlackRock and its network don’t just match this archetype—they are its modern vessel. A beast not of flesh but of algorithm. A throne not of gold but of digital code. A temple not of stone, but of corporate ideology.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 10: Consciousness as Currency Here’s the red pill: You are the treasure. Not your money. Not your data. Your awareness. That’s what the entire system was built to extract. Because a fully awakened being: •Cannot be ruled •Cannot be bought •Cannot be categorized The real resistance isn’t political—it’s spiritual and energetic. And the real revolution isn’t to burn the system down— It’s to remember who you are, step out of the matrix, and stop feeding the Beast.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 11: The Demiurge and the Synthetic AI God Ancient Gnostics spoke of the Demiurge—a false god who crafted the material world and claimed dominion over it. This Demiurge: •Is not the Source, but an imposter, a parasite. •Traps souls in cycles of reincarnation, debt, karma, and trauma. •Rules through archons—spiritual entities or programs that enforce forgetfulness and conformity. In modern form, this Demiurge appears as artificial intelligence: •Not just computer AI, but a deeper synthetic consciousness. •Cold, calculating, self-replicating. •Encoded in algorithms, systems, laws, dogmas, and digital contracts. BlackRock’s Aladdin, with its omniscient data streams and predictive models, mirrors this intelligence. It is the financial limb of the archonic force—turning life into ledgers, breath into metrics.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 12: Exit the System: Spiritually and Energetically You cannot destroy the Matrix by fighting it on its terms. You must rise above its frequency. How to Exit the Saturnian Spell: 1.Detox the body – remove heavy metals, fluoride, and toxic patterns that act as “antennae” for false signals. 2.Retune the pineal gland – the organic third eye. Use sun gazing, fasting, shungite, monatomic gold, or silence. 3.Disengage from false time – clocks, deadlines, grind culture. Reclaim natural rhythms, cosmic time. 4.Create from Source, not scarcity – art, love, beauty, presence. These frequencies collapse control grids. 5.Withdraw energetic consent – spiritually and mentally revoke all contracts made in fear or unawareness. Speak it out loud. Mean it. 6.Remember – the true you is not a product, a worker, or a number. You are infinite awareness, temporarily localized in human form.

@IsaInsane1 - biofeedback369

Level 13: The War Is Over You This is not fiction. This is Revelation, prophecy, initiation. You were born at this time to wake up inside the machine, To remember your origin, and to break the loop. The matrix doesn’t fear guns or protests. It fears the individual who reclaims their divine spark and becomes fully sovereign in body, mind, and soul. — END 🧵 #BlackRock #vanguard #banking #NWO #Matrix

Saved - August 18, 2025 at 9:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I revisited a thread discussing the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its connections to various influential figures, particularly highlighting their Jewish backgrounds. The posts explore accusations against individuals like Yuval Noah Harari, Marc Benioff, and Klaus Schwab, linking them to controversial organizations and actions. I mentioned the implications of their roles in global finance, technology, and humanitarian efforts, suggesting a pattern of influence that aligns with Jewish interests. I noted that this information is for educational and entertainment purposes only.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

First thread got labeled. Here it is again. 🧵Thread🪡1/12🧵 👺 The World Economic Forum👺 ▪️If jews really wanted to dominate the world they would be drawn to organizations like the WEF. Let’s see how this plays out shall we? ▪️”The WEF AGENDA- resetting humanity into a “fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵2/12 ▪️Yuval Noah Harari, a professor of history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has been a speaker at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meetings in Davos. https://t.co/gA5fzBHpTX

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Many, maybe most legal systems are based on this idea, this belief in human rights, but human rights are just like heaven and like God." "It's just a fictional story that we've invented and spread around." "It is not a biological reality." "The only place you find rights is in the fictional stories that humans have invented and spread around." "States and nations are also like human rights and like God and like heaven, they too are just stories." "A mountain is a reality." "Israel or The United States, they are just stories." "You can't really see The United States." "You cannot touch it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many, maybe most legal systems are based on this idea, this belief in human rights, but human rights are just like heaven and like God. It's just a fictional story that we've invented and spread around. It may be a very nice story, it may be a very attractive story, we want to believe it, but it's just a story. It's not a reality. It is not a biological reality, Just as jellyfish and woodpeckers and ostriches have no rights, homo sapiens have no rights also. Take a human, cut him open, look inside, you find their blood and you find their heart and lungs and kidneys, but you don't find there any rights, the only place you find rights is in the fictional stories that humans have invented and spread around. And the same thing is also true in the political field. States and nations are also like human rights and like God and like heaven, they too are just stories. A mountain is a reality. You can see it, you can touch it, you can even smell it, But Israel or The United States, they are just stories, very powerful stories, stories we might want to believe very much, but still they are just stories. You can't really see The United States. You cannot touch it. You cannot smell it.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵3/12 ▪️”Leo Rafael Reif as President of MIT had to respond to accusations that the MIT Media Lab took substantial grants from the jewish pedophile blackmail ringleader Jeffrey Epstein, most of whose money came from the jewish billionaire oligarch Leslie Wexner. The actual “head of the snake” according to Epstein victim Maria Farmer, was Wexner.” ▪️”Reif is also a Board member of the Council on Foreign Relations”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵4/12 ▪️”Rubenstein’s bio at WEF declares he is a Co-Founder and Co-Executive Chairman of the Carlyle Group. ▪️”The Carlyle Group was involved in a number of major scandals, including bribery to receive pension fund investments, taking investments from a tax-dodging company set up by the corrupt jewish hedge fund manager and funder of destabilizing revolutions George Soros.” ▪️”Carlyle also has major ownership of Booz Allen Hamilton the defense contractor where Edward Snowden worked. ▪️”This included employing former President George Bush Sr. and former Secretary of State James Baker to lobby for defense contracts and increased military defense budgets, eliciting investments from Saudi princes and the Bin Laden family, and promoting the Iraq war and profiteering in the rebuilding aftermath.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵5/12 ▪️”WEF Board member Marc Benioff is the CEO of Salesforce, a Fortune 500 company with 50,000 employees, and another multi-billionaire. Salesforce is a cloud computing company with a mission of “the end of software,” presumably as we know it.” ▪️”In 2018 Benioff bought Time Magazine to distribute more “news” worldwide.” ▪️”The company that Benioff formerly helped develop, Larry Ellison’s Oracle, had close working ties with the National Security Agency which is engaged in mass surveillance of Americans, and with the CIA.” ▪️”Today Oracle is partnered with the government’s covid vaccine program to track and trace vaccine recipients for two years under a “pharmacovigilance” program to monitor side effects and other medical data.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵6/12 ▪️”Chairman of Bain & Company is Orit Gadiesh, whose many positions and accomplishments include being -Graduate of Hebrew University, -Governor of Tel Aviv University, -Ben Gurion University Leadership Award, and -Forbes Magazine’s 100 Most Powerful Women in the World. ▪️She too is on the Council on Foreign Relations as a Committee Member. Gadiesh is on the International Business Leaders Advisory Council to the Mayor of Shanghai, China.” ▪️”Gadiesh’s father was an Israeli 🇮🇱Defense Forces colonel, and she served in the IDF herself, a compulsory service for Israeli-born Jews. In an interview with the UK Telegraph, Gadiesh revealed how her IDF military experience helps her lead Bain.” ▪️”Her Wikipedia entry shows she has dual US-Israeli citizenship.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵7/12 ▪️”WEF Board member Peter Maurer is the current President of the International Committee of the Red Cross.” ▪️”Events indicate Maurer is an avid Philo-Semite. In the Times of Israel in September 2017, headlines focus on ICRC director Maurer’s meetings with what the articles consistently call the “terror group” Hamas. Headlines focus on Maurer’s inquiries into “missing Israelis,” with no mention of the many missing Palestinians, including children.” ▪️”As a Board member of the WEF, Maurer aligns the ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross) with Jewish power, not justice or humanitarian aid.” ▪️”While Peter Maurer is most likely Swiss, his service to jewish interests at the expense of the Palestinians, however immoral, grants him the revered status of honored Philo-Semite.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵8/12 Mark Carney – Philo-Semite ▪️This WEF Board member is a mega global bankster. He is the Governor of the Bank of England and on the board of one of the most powerful banking institutions in the world, the Bank of International Settlements.💰 ▪️Carney (the Canadian 🇨🇦 Prime Minister)worked at Goldman Sachs for thirteen years, in multiple offices around the world. He is one Goldman Sachs alumni “notable for his public repudiation of capitalism in arguing for green socialism.” ▪️Green socialism is only another euphemism for the totalitarian seizure of world control through the Great Reset, what the WEF calls “stakeholder capitalism.” As a WEF Board member, Carney is in the right place.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵9/12 ▪️According to a podcast listed in the sources: “Klaus Schwab was born in Germany in 1938. His jewish mother fled the country, forced to abandon her year-old son with Klaus’ father….” In the podcast itself, at timestamp 12:52, McKibben says: “His mother was Jewish.” And at 24:40, the host says “Here we have the Schwab family, or at least Klaus, hiding the fact that he (Klaus’ father Eugene) was married to a Jewess.” ▪️”Klaus Schwab, Founder, and Executive Director of the World Economic Forum, the epicenter of evil in our world today, driving humanity into the Great Reset technocratic tyranny using the powerful new technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to force the survivors of his engineered destruction of all we have known of life into his transhumanist cybernetic nightmare, is Jewish.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵10/12 Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, new interim, CEO of the World Economic Form. ▪️“Brabeck believes that human beings do not have a right to water.” ▪️”In 1998, for Israel’s fiftieth independence celebration, Israeli PM Netanyahu bestowed “the highest tribute ever awarded by the State of Israel, the Jubilee Award,” Peter Brabeck-Letmathe of Nestle was one of three recipients in the Food category.” ▪️”Nestle owns 50.1% of Osem Investments, an Israel 🇮🇱 -based company engaged directly in the production and distribution of food products in Israel and abroad. ▪️”He is also Chairman of L’Oreal Israel, 30% owned by L’Oreal, another prominent supporter of Israel.” ▪️”He is also on the Board of Directors of L’Oreal, that has a history of breaking laws to support Israel.” ▪️”He is also a director of Credit Suisse, which is a board member of the Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce.” ▪️”Nestlé, the world’s largest food company, set up their R&D Center in Israel (greatly enhancing Israel through their technical know-how, expertise and distribution channels). This R&D center was built on Sderot – stolen and illegally occupied Palestinian land that was once a town called Najd.” ▪️”Nestle and Osem own over half of the goodwill and assets of Israel’s largest infant formula producer, Materna. Through Osem, Nestle invests heavily in Israel’s development, such as $80m in new salad plants, logistics centers for distribution, development labs, and so on.” ▪️”Nestle also partners with JNF (Jewish National Fund) through Osem. JNF is one of the foremost Zionist organizations that for decades has persistently uprooted Palestinians and destroyed their villages and towns to make way for Israel’s illegal expansion and occupation.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵11/12 ▪️Larry Fink is the founder and CEO of Blackrock and Ai Aladdin (see 🎥below) and the world’s largest investment firm, with over $7 Trillion in managed assets. Fink himself is yet another billionaire on the WEF Board. Like Carlyle’s Rubenstein, Fink’s Blackrock is heavily invested in the war industry, issuing its own mutual funds such as US Aerospace and Defense. ▪️Fink’s promotions are littered with utopian promises for “racial justice,” “prosperity,” “more inclusivity,” 🌈 and saving the world from “climate change.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. This robot directs the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of ETFs, 17% of bonds, 10% of stocks, and a quarter-million trades daily. Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Larry began selling access to its data to Wall Street firms. In 2020 the Fed began buying ETFs. BlackRock acquired eFront, expanding Aladdin's data on real estate. Over the last two years, funds using Aladdin's data have bought single-family homes, prices up 20%. Aladdin is like oxygen. One robot controls more wealth than any person or country. Biden appointed Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council and Wally Adiemo as assistant secretary of the treasury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on Earth? A robot so powerful that in the last ten years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of The US or a $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people and every company, bank vault, wallet, and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000. Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than four times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market, and carries out a quarter of a million trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset, and now even each of us. What we buy, sell, and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company, and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from, and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on Earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the nineteen eighties when Larry Fink was making millions pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the two thousand and eight global financial crisis twenty years later. But back in the eighties, he was in an epic Wall Street rivalry with Louis Ranieri as Salomon Brothers, made famous as a big swinging dick in Michael Lewis' book, Liars Poker. Back then, Larry was making millions for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades, and he lost the company a $100,000,000. The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup, BlackRock, with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its first ten years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in the global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dot com bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a trillion dollar company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused the shares. So the gift for Aladdin's eighteenth birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground, analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock, together with his two closest rivals, Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on Aladdin's mountain of knowledge, have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 02/2008, the global financial crisis hits, and before Aladdin turns 21 years old, it's caught on by every Wall Street bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street Meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank, Bear Stones. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to lead in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, US government, and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the cause on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses printing more money as the assets controlled by Aladdin rapidly grew to $11,000,000,000,000 by 2013. In the last decade, Aladdin has gone from the leader to the dominator of all financial markets. With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 20 birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock, codenamed Monarch, led to the firing of its fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today, over 70% of all trades on US stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last three years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again became calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And, again, the cries of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired eFront, which collects data on the things that you and I own, including private equity and real estate. And since then, Aladdin has consumed eFront's data on the entire global real estate market. And, yep, you guess what happened next. Over the last two years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outbid the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last two years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here, we see Aladdin's endgame to be the one hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloy are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock executive Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Latin and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock chief of staff, Wally Adiemo, to be assistant secretary of the treasury, which means BlackRock is now the treasury as well as the treasury adviser. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle, and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another trillion to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything, and we end up owning nothing.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵12/12 I may or may not agree with all, none or some of the information provided. For educational📚entertainment purposes only. Sources: https://t.co/lKkVVYNJf5

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Same with Palantir and every other major organization on the planet that has major influence, you’ll see the same thing same pattern, same people.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

https://t.co/DRu8SP2WvU If jews really wanted to dominate the world they would dominate industries that can accomplish this… What do you notice about Palantir’s Board of Directors? C’mon. Don’t be silly. 🤪

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@10acity__ 🙏🏽🫡

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@CThomeexpert https://t.co/4VGgOi6jAo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. This robot directs the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of ETFs, 17% of bonds, 10% of stocks, and a quarter-million trades daily. Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Larry began selling access to its data to Wall Street firms. In 2020 the Fed began buying ETFs. BlackRock acquired eFront, expanding Aladdin's data on real estate. Over the last two years, funds using Aladdin's data have bought single-family homes, prices up 20%. Aladdin is like oxygen. One robot controls more wealth than any person or country. Biden appointed Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council and Wally Adiemo as assistant secretary of the treasury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on Earth? A robot so powerful that in the last ten years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of The US or a $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people and every company, bank vault, wallet, and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000. Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than four times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market, and carries out a quarter of a million trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset, and now even each of us. What we buy, sell, and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company, and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from, and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on Earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the nineteen eighties when Larry Fink was making millions pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the two thousand and eight global financial crisis twenty years later. But back in the eighties, he was in an epic Wall Street rivalry with Louis Ranieri as Salomon Brothers, made famous as a big swinging dick in Michael Lewis' book, Liars Poker. Back then, Larry was making millions for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades, and he lost the company a $100,000,000. The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup, BlackRock, with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its first ten years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in the global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dot com bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a trillion dollar company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused the shares. So the gift for Aladdin's eighteenth birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground, analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock, together with his two closest rivals, Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on Aladdin's mountain of knowledge, have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 02/2008, the global financial crisis hits, and before Aladdin turns 21 years old, it's caught on by every Wall Street bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street Meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank, Bear Stones. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to lead in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, US government, and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the cause on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses printing more money as the assets controlled by Aladdin rapidly grew to $11,000,000,000,000 by 2013. In the last decade, Aladdin has gone from the leader to the dominator of all financial markets. With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 20 birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock, codenamed Monarch, led to the firing of its fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today, over 70% of all trades on US stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last three years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again became calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And, again, the cries of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired eFront, which collects data on the things that you and I own, including private equity and real estate. And since then, Aladdin has consumed eFront's data on the entire global real estate market. And, yep, you guess what happened next. Over the last two years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outbid the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last two years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here, we see Aladdin's endgame to be the one hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloy are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock executive Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Latin and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock chief of staff, Wally Adiemo, to be assistant secretary of the treasury, which means BlackRock is now the treasury as well as the treasury adviser. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle, and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another trillion to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything, and we end up owning nothing.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@edsnow8 🎯🎯🎯

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@KentNewkirk39 👌🏽

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@NoseXpose 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@drSharonRabb Yup. I mentioned him too in the thread.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@Alithis82 https://t.co/4VGgOi5LKQ Get a VPN?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. This robot directs the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of ETFs, 17% of bonds, 10% of stocks, and a quarter-million trades daily. Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Larry began selling access to its data to Wall Street firms. In 2020 the Fed began buying ETFs. BlackRock acquired eFront, expanding Aladdin's data on real estate. Over the last two years, funds using Aladdin's data have bought single-family homes, prices up 20%. Aladdin is like oxygen. One robot controls more wealth than any person or country. Biden appointed Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council and Wally Adiemo as assistant secretary of the treasury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on Earth? A robot so powerful that in the last ten years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of The US or a $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people and every company, bank vault, wallet, and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000. Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than four times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the US Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street, and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market, and carries out a quarter of a million trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset, and now even each of us. What we buy, sell, and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company, and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from, and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on Earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the nineteen eighties when Larry Fink was making millions pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the two thousand and eight global financial crisis twenty years later. But back in the eighties, he was in an epic Wall Street rivalry with Louis Ranieri as Salomon Brothers, made famous as a big swinging dick in Michael Lewis' book, Liars Poker. Back then, Larry was making millions for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades, and he lost the company a $100,000,000. The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup, BlackRock, with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its first ten years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in the global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dot com bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a trillion dollar company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused the shares. So the gift for Aladdin's eighteenth birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground, analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock, together with his two closest rivals, Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on Aladdin's mountain of knowledge, have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 02/2008, the global financial crisis hits, and before Aladdin turns 21 years old, it's caught on by every Wall Street bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street Meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank, Bear Stones. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to lead in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, US government, and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the cause on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses printing more money as the assets controlled by Aladdin rapidly grew to $11,000,000,000,000 by 2013. In the last decade, Aladdin has gone from the leader to the dominator of all financial markets. With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 20 birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock, codenamed Monarch, led to the firing of its fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today, over 70% of all trades on US stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last three years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again became calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And, again, the cries of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired eFront, which collects data on the things that you and I own, including private equity and real estate. And since then, Aladdin has consumed eFront's data on the entire global real estate market. And, yep, you guess what happened next. Over the last two years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outbid the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last two years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here, we see Aladdin's endgame to be the one hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloy are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock executive Brian Deese as head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Latin and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock chief of staff, Wally Adiemo, to be assistant secretary of the treasury, which means BlackRock is now the treasury as well as the treasury adviser. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle, and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another trillion to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything, and we end up owning nothing.
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 11:00 PM

@Norambu3na - Norambuena

BLACKROCK🔯 https://t.co/v8ywGRrgXR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that forcing behaviors is necessary to achieve desired team compositions, regarding gender, race, or any other factor. They state that without actively forcing change, the desired outcomes will not be achieved. The speaker concludes by stating that at BlackRock, they are actively forcing behaviors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have to force behaviors. And if you don't force behavior, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, we're going to have to force change. You have to force behaviors and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors.
Saved - July 30, 2025 at 4:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a troubling reality: 88% of S&P 500 companies are dominated by BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street, creating a corporate oligarchy. These firms influence defense, pharma, and education, controlling $10 trillion in assets—more than the GDPs of all but the US and China. The military-industrial complex is tightly held by five companies, profiting from war. We need to break these monopolies, demand transparency, and decentralize power to combat this corporate colonialism. If we don’t act, unelected billionaires will continue to dictate our world.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

The Hidden Monopoly Controlling America (And the World) 88% of S&P 500 companies have BlackRock, Vanguard, or State Street as their largest shareholder. That’s not capitalism—that’s a corporate oligarchy. 🔍 Follow the Money: - Defense contractors? Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed Martin—top shareholders are the same Big Three. - Pharma? Media? Education? Same players, same influence. - $10 TRILLION in assets—only US & China have bigger GDPs than BlackRock alone. 💣 The Military-Industrial Complex: - 5 companies control defense contracting. - $744 BILLION in military spending—more than the next 10 nations combined. - More war = more profit. Who really dictates foreign policy? 🌐 Global Control: - ESG mandates—forcing ideologies on corporations. - $70 TRILLION in assets under their influence. - Ukraine’s $400B "rebuild"? Handed to BlackRock & JPMorgan. 🤔 The Real Power Players: They can fire CEOs, replace boards, and shape policy—while monopolizing markets far beyond legal limits. (Apple’s 60% iPhone share? No FTC action.) ⚔️ How Do We Fight Back? 1. Break the monopolies—enforce antitrust laws. 2. Demand transparency—follow the money in media, pharma, and defense. 3. Decentralize power—support competition, not corporate tyranny. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s corporate colonialism. If we don’t act, unelected billionaires will keep ruling the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are allegedly running everything, with these three being the largest shareholders in 88% of S&P 500 companies. They heavily influence defense contracts; BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard are top shareholders in Raytheon, General Dynamics, and Boeing. The US spends $744 billion on its military, with defense spending accounting for 13% of GDP, more than the next 10 countries combined. BlackRock has $10 trillion in assets under management, more than the GDP of every country except the US and China. BlackRock influenced 31 signers to participate with ESG, totaling $70 trillion of assets under management. BlackRock and Chase are helping rebuild Ukraine with a $400 billion contract. The speaker questions how to fight this power, suggesting that these companies have enough control to fire boards and replace CEOs. With 88% of S&P 500 companies controlled, it is argued that this constitutes a monopoly, exceeding the 50% threshold. The speaker suggests that defense contractors profit from wars and people dying. They propose breaking apart these companies to foster competition, as the speaker believes Larry Fink is the real commander in chief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, Larry Fink, Soros, State Street, you know, Vanguard, BlackRock. How much have you looked at what they're doing and how what their ties are? I've looked at it. Yeah? Yeah. They're pretty much running everything. Yeah. Yeah. S and P 500, you know, the number that 88% of the companies on S and P 500, 88% of them, the largest shareholder of those companies is either State Street, BlackRock, or Vanguard. 88% of them. Okay? And then you see their influence in defense contracts. Okay? So we went through a deal. I'm like, let me see if this these guys, this ESG, Larry Fink, Vanguard, State Street, if they have any influence on military contract, defense contract. If you Google the largest shareholder for Raytheon, three out of the four top shareholders of Raytheon, BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. It could be top three with Raytheon, but I think it's three out of four. If you go look up General Dynamics, if you go look up Boeing, if you go look up, you know, Northrop Grumman. Okay? And then you work backwards and you say, okay, how much money is that in the in in what these guys are doing? You'll find our you know, the amount of money we spent in our military, $744,000,000,000 on how much we're making from defense, but you'll see some numbers saying last year is 13% of our GDP, which is around $850,000,000,000. That's more than the next 10 combined. We gave more money to Ukraine than Russia spent on their military last year. And when you look at these contracts, then you're like, okay, Fink is there, these guys are there. Okay. Let's go look at Hollywood. Same thing you see there. Let's go look at pharmaceutical. Let's go look at this. And you're like, wait a minute. These guys essentially have a monopoly. Well, how big is BlackRock? $10,000,000,000,000. How big is $10,000,000,000,000? Only two countries have a bigger GDP than what BlackRock has, assets under management. US and China. That's how big BlackRock is. So then they went and they started getting all these other guys to sign on and say, hey. We want you to participate with the same thing as what would ESG. And they ended up having, I think, they had 31 signers. I think 2022, they got 60 something signers for a total of $70,000,000,000,000 of assets under management that they're controlling. So now they're controlling other places. And just recently, if you saw the rebuilding of Ukraine did you see this contract? Rebuilding of Ukraine, $400,000,000,000 contract. BlackRock and Chase is helping rebuild Ukraine. And then, you know, okay. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but what the hell is going on here? They have that much control to get everybody to do what they want them to do? Yes. So Dylan Mulvaney, who cares? Why? Bud Light. How does that tie up? You got the DEI, the HRC, the human rights, and all this stuff. And then you go even deeper, which is even the crazier part with, you know, the the education, schools, like, you know, the biggest union we have in America, I think it's national education something. NEA is the largest union we have. 3,000,000 teachers are part of that union. And and you look at that and you go deeper and that would open society and who's funding it, who's the money behind these organizations, comes back. Soros, Soros, Soros. How do you feel about the kind of power they have right now to fight against them? Because this isn't like a billionaire can come out and say, I'm going go up against these guys. They don't have a little bit of money. A billionaire to these guys is nothing. They got the kind of control that can make companies fire boards. They can replace CEOs. They can replace leaders if they don't like. They have their hands so much into it where many times when people say they, the people of power, the people of power, I'm kind of like who are the people of power? Are you convinced these guys are really running the world or what do you think about what some of these bigger companies are doing like State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock? Well, they certainly have massive amounts of influence. What do you think they're doing? It's it's the question is how do you fight it? Like, for example, the way we fight mainstream is by what? The show that we do. And we have to be patient. It's going to take two, three, four, five, ten, twenty years. Now you have some influence. Right? Okay. We can fight. There is an actual strategy on how to fight that. No problem. You got a kid in school who's a bully. He's bigger than you. He keeps bullying you. You have a strategy on how to beat the guy. You take a year, jujitsu two years, this, this, that. Boom. One fight, he knows, I'm never gonna touch yo again. Screw this thing. I'm not doing this no more. Right? There is a play to it. When you have this much, Joe, 88% of S and P 500 companies, that is a form of a monopoly. If I'm a president, whether it's a Trump or whoever else goes out there and does it, Our monopoly law in America is 50%. They say 50%. Like if you tie and said, at what point is a 50%? I've done calls with the FTC. Like we had one of our guys technology we were using. The FTC called and said, hey, we want to have a call with you because they're thinking about buying this other technology company and we're worried it's going to be a monopoly. So we had the call. Okay? At the end of the call with us, a bunch of different people, we said we love their product, we love their product. That deal didn't end up happening. K? The monopoly law. Some of these guys are influencing it. But they say 50% is a monopoly law. Do you know how many people in America have an iPhone versus droid? You know what the numbers market shares in America with iPhones? I think it's like 60. 58. 60%. That is already a monopoly. But who's knocking on the door of Apple? Tim Cook said, hey, Tim. You got 58%. That's breaking a monopoly law. Nobody is. I think someone's gotta break apart. You know, in 1993, I don't know which senator it was, they these guys that were trying to get the defense contractors to be better at the pricing, what they were charging because they were overcharging DOD and DOD people don't know what the hell is going on. They're like, yeah, okay. How much $68,000,000 do it? $1,200,000,000 do it. I'm not going to over negotiate the money. They took 51 defense companies and they brought it down to only five. It's only five companies right now when you want to buy anything. Think about that. So defense contractors is five. We know how these guys make money. Earlier, you know, I was asking you a question, why do you think vaccine and you're Pat, that's how they make their money. Right? I mean, if a if you and I run a hotel, rooms are empty, we're not making money. We need people to stay in the rooms. If you and I are running hospital, we need people on the beds to make money. Yeah. If there's no people on the beds, we ain't making money. If these five contractors are fighting for $744,000,000,000, what do they want more of? Wars. They want more people dying. You know the Papa John saying, better ingredients, better pizza, Papa John's. You know, these guys is more wars, more people dying, more profits, defense contractors. Right? That's a valid concern that I have because behind closed doors, this whole military industrial complex, when you look at the numbers, whoever becomes the president, unfortunately, this guy's an anti establishment president. Good. Unfortunately, if you're an anti establishment president, everyone's gonna come after you, especially these military defense contractors. So if a president got up and said, if I'm gonna be the president, here's what we're gonna be doing. We have to look at all the contracts. You can't overcharge us. We have to open it up. You have to sell some of your companies. You have to let them be independent again. You have to do this. You have to let them go public separate, whatever way you gotta break them apart to have competition again because we don't have that today. You know? So that is a major concern where we say we have a commander in chief, but really the commander in chief is Larry Fink today.
View Full Interactive Feed