TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

SpartaJustice
Posted - March 22, 2023 at 7:07 PM
Saved - February 9, 2024 at 11:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss conspiracy theories related to the origins and effects of Covid-19, alleging that it was intentionally created and released by various individuals and organizations. They also claim that the Covid vaccines are part of a global genocide experiment and a means of controlling the population through nanotechnology and artificial intelligence. The posts mention specific individuals, such as Bill Gates and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, as being involved in these alleged crimes. The authors express concerns about the potential implications of synthetic biology, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology on humanity. However, it is important to note that these claims are unsubstantiated and lack scientific evidence.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

HOW THEY DID IT: They used a particular bug (Coronavirus) that was previously relatively benign and nonpathogenic and modified it through the use of gene editing techniques to make the bug (Covid-19) virulent, pathogenic, dangerous and then released that bug (Covid) in key sites. They went one step further, they created small controllable robotic units at the nano scale that can be aerosolized to create a nano swarm. It is a bio penetrable material that you cannot see and that is able to integrate itself through a variety of membranes such as the mouth, nose, ears and eyes. Once it enters these membranes it can then be taken up into the vascular system to create clumping. It can also affect the vascular system of the brain or it can directly be diffused into the brain space and be weaponized. This can be done at such a level that their presence is almost impossible to detect. The delivery system was the Covid Vaccines that they injected into billions of people to kill and to control the populations around the world. When I say they, it is the criminal defendants listed below involved in violating article 6 (Genocide) and article 7 (Crimes Against Humanity) of the International Criminal Code: Bill and Melinda Gates individually and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. World Health Organization (WHO) and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus WHO Director General, U.S. FDA, CDC Executive Directors and Officers. NIH, NIAID Executive Directors and Officers. Anthony Stephen Fauci. Alex Azar HHS, Ralph Baric, Peter Daszak. World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab and Officers, Directors, Employees, and Agents. Michael Bloomberg, David Rockefeller Jr, Rothschilds, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Rockefeller Foundation, Global Business Network (GBN), Peter Schwartz, Chairman GBN. Convicted Vaccination Genocidal Pandemic and Neural Monitoring Governmental Executive Defendants: U.S. Department of Defense Executive Command and DARPA. Xi JinPing, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation. Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America. Joseph R. Biden 46th President of the United States of America. Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel. Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the UK. Matt Hancock, UK Secretary of State for Health. The Crown Corporation and all of its Subsidiaries including and not limited to Serco. Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada. Chrystia Freeland DBA Deputy Prime Minister. Dr. Theresa Tam, Canada Chief Health Officer. Dr. Supriya Sharma, Chief medical adviser for Health Canada. OECD - Secretary General - Mathias Cormann. Scott Morrison, Prime Minister of Australia. Jacinda Arden, Prime Minister of New Zealand. King Charles III, Prince William. Governor General Mary Simon. Stefan Löfven Prime Minister of Sweden. Minister of Heath Lena Hallengren. Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India. Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron, President of France. Edouard Phillipe, Prime Minister of France. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany. António Guterres, Secretary General of the UN. European Union, and President of the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. President of the Parliament, David Sassoli. President of the European Council, Charles Michel. Michael Ryan, WHO CEO's at GCHQ-UK, NSA-USA and Bilderberg Group, all CEOs, Monarchies, and Members. Convicted Defendant Pandemic Vaccine Programs: Global Alliance Vaccine Initiative (GAVI), CEPI, Pandemic Vaccine Program United States of America, Operation Warp Speed and successor Pandemic Vaccine Program. World Health Organization COVAX, Pandemic Vaccine Program. Pandemic Vaccine Program People's Republic of China, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control. Russian Federation, Rospotrebnadzor. Convicted Genocidal Vaccination Entities: Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, The Pirbright Institute.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of novel neuro weapons, which have gained momentum due to increased understanding of the brain and the development of tools to access and affect it. These weapons can be used to target individuals covertly, affecting their brain functions and behavior. The speaker gives an example of lacing someone's drink with a low dose drug or toxin during a meeting, which can either incapacitate them or change their mindset. This can have ripple effects, such as influencing the behavior of the person's followers or fracturing trust within a population. The speaker also mentions the use of high morbidity neurobugs to cause psychological and physical symptoms in a targeted population. Additionally, the speaker discusses the potential use of nano particulate matter and controllable robotic units as undetectable and difficult to attribute weapons.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this is where we get into the idea of novel neuro weapons. Once again, this is not necessarily new, but the momentum of this dimension of the field has accelerated as a consequence of increased understanding of the brain and increased capability to develop tools and techniques to access and affect the brain. So what are we seeing here? Well, take a look. We see in close neuro pharmaceuticals and organic toxins. What's new about this is the in close nature of this. Increasingly, we're not seeing these things as weapons of mass destruction against gross aspects of the population. Although, certainly, many neuro weapons such as Sarin gas and VX and other forms of neurotoxic agents can be leveraged against large groups of people, but that's messy. More specifically perhaps, might be targeting individuals on a level that allows either direct attribution or covert engagement with non attribution. Let me give you an example of what I mean. So this gentleman is the leader of some group, a political group, a social group, a combative group. And under the veil of a white flag, he and I are now to have some kind of a caucus, a meeting. And during that meeting, what I do is I lace the rim of his drink or his pen or his seat or something in his medium environment with very, very low dose drug or toxins that are going to affect of his stability, they may affect the way his brain works. And as a consequence of that, they can affect the functions of his brain, his thought patterns, his relative emotionality, and the behaviors that go along with that. 1 of 2 things might happen. He might be completely incapacitated as a consequence of this, or he may change his level of capacity and engagement so that he went into the meeting thinking, I hate this guy. This guy's my enemy. It walks out of me going, I love this guy. This guy's great. Now, what could happen if in fact this is a gentleman who has charismatic, financial, elected, or dictatorial power, it may be that his followers will then follow him blindly. He came into the meeting as a leader of those followers who were bellicose, who were volatile, who were violent and aggressive. He comes out of the meeting, he tells them to change their behaviors, and they do. Or I could sever the trust. By now, he leaves this this meeting. He's espousing a very different philosophical stance and orientation, and his followers no longer adhere to his precepts, his tenets, or his lead, and I fractured the relative arrangement of trust, engagement, capability that he fostered, leaving that population disrupted and vulnerable to intervention, to a coup d'etat, to a junta, to some type of insertive reassumption of leadership. You see how this can work? Furthermore, I can use this very tactically. Some of these agents allow me to assemble the agent on-site and not have to stockpile it, which allows me to take the components of this agent into and out of a country relatively covertly, target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution and trace, and be able to leave prior to any attribution. Think Novichok. Or I could assemble very small quantities of this that would then allow a specific intervention characteristically in a place that would not allow such an intervention, think of the use of a derivative of vx in an airport. But I could do more than that. I could also incur much broader type of ripple effects. And one of the ways I could also do that is with it's called high morbidity neuromicrobiologic agents. It's a real fancy way of saying neurobugs. But high morbidity neurobugs. I may not want to kill a lot of people. In fact, arguably, I may assume what is sometimes referred to as the Sailor Mallon Mantra. For those of you who may be fans or students of military history, you may remember that Celler Mallon, Wing Commander Celler Mallon, was a South African who flew with the Royal Air Force during the 2nd World War. And he became well known during the Battle of Britain for shooting up German airplanes, but letting them limp home, particularly bomber aircraft. And they would ask Celler Malin, oh, Wing Commander, why didn't you shoot that plane down? And his adage was simple. Better to have that plane return home with wounded crew who are spitting up their lungs, 1 dead crewman that they had to attend to and therefore divert their missional capability while in flight, then shoot them down because the psychological effect will be rippling and devastating. This is sometimes referred to as the Malin effect. What can I do? I can use a particular bug that I may be able to now modify through the use of gene editing technique that is ubiquitously available and fairly easy to use to take a bug that was previously relatively benign and nonpathogenic and make that bug virulent, pathogenic, dangerous. And then what could I do? I could introduce that bug in key sites, Des Moines, Seattle, Tampa, Newark, Houston. I get a few people sick. I do it on an airplane, do it in an airport, do it at a sporting event, do it on Black Friday. And then what I would do is I would take credit for that, but I want to make sure that at least part of the symptomatic constellation was not only neurological, was profoundly psychological. Agitation, debilitation, sweating, stomach problems, sleeplessness, cardiac problems, things that are very we call top down neurological in their effect, brain to body and body to brain in the bottom up cascade. Then what I would do is I would get on the Internet, and I would put out over the Internet, I did it. Oh, yes. I'm that dangerous g group that you should all be afraid of. And in fact, this is far more ubiquitous than I let on. These are only the first cases. I've let these buggies go all over the country and your early warning signs are agitation, anxiety, worry, sleeplessness, stomach problems, heart problems, what have I done? I've rippled the sheets of the worried well. At first blush, I get every hypochondriac running to their physician, but at second and third blush, I get those individuals who begin to become worried that they may have been exposed to this, that their children may have been exposed to this, that their loved ones, their kin, their kids may have been exposed to this. Of course, the physicians, the CDC, the public health service comes back and says, no, no. That's not what's going on. But I get back on the Internet and I say, oh, don't you listen to that. That's fake. That's false. Your government knows what's going on. They can't do anything about it, and they can't treat you. They're going to end up quarantining you. How many people would I need to affect? We modeled it somewhere between 12240. What would be the effect? Hang on, folks. Within 41 to 45 days, we would crash the United States public health system. Crash it. In so doing, I render the United States infrastructure vulnerable, either there or elsewhere. See the ripple effect? See the disruptive effect? I can disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system and disrupt individuals on a variety of levels from individuals all the way up to the social fabric. And that social fabric may go even further. It may be geopolitical. We can even go further. One of the newest developments is that nano particulate matter can be stabilized for distribution. If you're not aware of what nanoparticulate matter is, it's that matter which exists on a scale of 1 times 10 to the minus 9th. Is very, very small, smaller than a cell. And we can manufacture materials that have discrete properties that can be controlled by virtue of bioengineering in their physical chemistry. To auto aggregate, to be able to aggregate in particular areas based upon their biological and or chemical sensitivity. But now, we go one step further. Most recently, just a few weeks ago, it was announced that you could then aerosolize nano materials. And go one step further, I can create small robotic units, controllable robotic units at the nano scale and that these 2 can be aerosolized to create a nano swarm of biopenetrable materials that you cannot see, that can penetrate all but the most robust biochemical filters, that are able to integrate themselves through a variety of membranes, mucus membranes, and wherever mouth, nose, ears, eyes, can be then uptaken into the vascular system to create clumping, can affect the vascular system of the brain, or can directly diffuse into the brain space, and these can be weaponized. And that can be done in such a level that their presence is almost impossible to detect. And as such, the attribution becomes exceedingly difficult to demonstrate. How much of this material would I need? Take a look. This is the front of my pen. This amount of nano material, if be able to maintain and sustained with regard to its deliverability and aerosolization could, in fact, affect all of you. Or based upon where I come from New York City, all yous. Look at this. Look at this. I'm carrying that material. Would you see it? Would I have to lug a giant weapon into the room? No, I wouldn't. And what if, in fact, I utilize some form of an unmanned aerial device or unmanned ground device as delivery vehicle, something like a drone or a bug. Could I do something with that?

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

THEY RELEASED COVID-19: U.S. Patents show CDC ownership of Coronavirus. Both China and the U.S. involved in creating SARS-CoV-2. Bill Gates and CCP appoints criminal Tedros of WHO. The DOD, FDA, CIA, NIH, Fauci, Baric, Daszak, Rockefeller, Rothschilds are all involved in these Crimes. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation paid Google, Facebook, Politico, Wikipedia, Fact Checkers in order to censor and control all the information. The CIA has been using Operation Mockingbird for years and has over 3,000 agents implanted in Mainstream Media to control the population. Event 201 was sponsored by Bill Gates, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (CIA) and the World Economic Forum to enforce a worldwide Pandemic response 5 months before the WHO fraudulently declared a global pandemic. It was a planned coordinated criminal effort worldwide. In January 2017 Anthony Fauci said there will be a surprise virus outbreak before the end of 2020. Bill Gates in 2015 talked of a future pandemic and lied in April 2020 when he said they did not simulate or practice for a pandemic. Klaus Schwab in his book Covid-19 The Great Reset shows Covid was the Trojan Horse to Reset the World according to the UN 2030 Agenda. Build Back Better slogan is a criminal coordinated effort to remove human rights and institute a one world government. Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation bribes the WHO, NIH, NIAID, CDC, FDA, Medical Schools and Journals to control the health industry and public health policy. WHO Chief Tedros involved in genocide killing and torture in Ethiopia. Tedros is a known member of the communist party. He is Beijing's and Gates puppet. As a Health Minister he was accused of covering up three Cholera Epidemics and committing crimes against humanity. CCP and Bill Gates helped put Tedros in charge of the WHO. John D. Rockefeller over 100 years ago seized the U.S. Media and took control over public health using toxic petroleum based drugs for profit and controlled the American Medical Association blacklisting and expelling any doctors who practiced natural medicine. Rockefeller's poison injections and medicines started causing cancer in early years and to cover it up formed the American Cancer Society. Medical error is the 3rd leading cause of death in America. Bill Gates used India and Africa as guinea pigs for pharmaceutical companies to make a financial killing while killing a lot of people in the process including killing innocent children and babies with vaccines. Bill Gates controls GAVI The Vaccine Alliance to vaccinate the world with his poisons. National Security Study Memorandum NSSM 200 Implications of Worldwide Population Growth For U.S. Security and Overseas Interests December 10, 1974 (THE KISSINGER REPORT) shows the intention of governments to reduce the population. Bill Gates is one of the key funders in the Stratosphere experiment to block out the sun for Climate Change by releasing poisons in the air. Environmental Scientist call it global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over one billion dollars in the Earth Now Global Surveillance project to launch hundreds of satellites to monitor people everywhere 24/7 a day. In partnership with MIT Bill Gates has developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. Bill Gates Gates funded genetically modified mosquitoes released in the USA to allow human immunization by means of mosquito bites "Flying Syringes." Gates had business dealings and a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex criminal. Why would he choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile? Gates is the top financial donor of the WHO and CDC. No one person has more power than Gates to influence and control the health and medical freedom of all people. Bill Gates and all mRNA Vaccines must be stopped. This is a global genocide experiment and a takeover of humanity. https://t.co/pkVjxFyPZ3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses various controversial topics related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the involvement of individuals such as Anthony Fauci, Ralph Barrick, and Bill Gates. It highlights the patenting of the coronavirus by the CDC and the manipulation of the virus for profit. The video also mentions the role of the World Health Organization and the Gates Foundation in promoting vaccines and their potential influence on global health policies. It raises concerns about conflicts of interest, the control of information by powerful organizations, and the potential harm caused by vaccines. The video suggests that there may be hidden agendas and manipulation of public opinion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Barrick, that the Center For Disease Control, and the laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing coronavirus were at the hub of this story. In 1999, patents on coronavirus started showing up. And thus began the rabbit trail. Speaker 1: March 2003. Panic grips Hong Kong as a deadly new virus sweeps through the city. Speaker 0: In 2003, the Center For Disease Control saw the possibility of a gold strike, and that was the coronavirus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw that a virus they knew could be easily manipulated was something that was very valuable. And in 2003, they sought to patent it. And they made sure that they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection, and all of the measurement of it. From 2,003 to 2018, they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus. Speaker 2: The World Health Organization has officially named the novel coronavirus. We think that the coronavirus Speaker 3: outbreak of Speaker 4: the coronavirus crisis. Speaker 2: Coronavirus crisis to this pandemic. And the international public health emergency. Speaker 0: Well, we know that the coronavirus manipulation started with doctor Ralph Barrick in 1999. Speaker 5: The major characteristics of SARS, MERS, and SARS coronavirus 2. It's a good way Speaker 0: Ralph Barrick is the researcher at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research. In 2002, there was a recognition that the coronavirus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On April 25, 2003, the US Center For Disease Control filed a patent on the coronavirus transmitted to humans. Under 35 US code section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented. Either SARS, coronavirus, was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural, filing a patent on it was illegal, then either outcome, both are illegal. In the spring of 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private. They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent, they had the ability to control who was authorized and who was not authorized to make independent inquiries into coronavirus. You cannot look at the virus. You cannot measure it. You cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, they had the means, they had the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to profit. Speaker 6: Developing and owning a coronavirus vaccine has become a biotech arms race with political overtones. Speaker 0: This vaccine gold rush is starting to bother me. Gold rush. Let's keep that in mind. And so somewhere between 2,012,013, something happened. The federal funding for research that was feeding into places like Harvard, Emory, University North Carolina Chapel Hill. That funding suddenly became impaired by something that happened at the NIH, where the NIH got this little tiny moment of clarity and said, I think something we're doing is wrong. And in 2013, the NIH said gain of function research on coronavirus should be suspended. The National Institutes of Health had a moral and social and potentially legal reason to object to research. But the letters that were sent to the researchers essentially said, you are receiving notice that we're telling you to stop. And now on the bottom of the page, we're gonna clarify what stop means. Keep going. But when the heat gets hot in 2014 and 15, what do you do? You offshore the research. You fund the Wuhan Institute of Virology to do this stuff that sounds like it's getting a little edgy with respect to its morality and legality. But do you do it straight away? No. You run the money through a series of cover organizations to make it look like you're funding a US operation, which then subcontracts with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The US could say China did it. China could say the US did it. And the cool thing is both of them are almost telling the truth. Speaker 2: Where did the coronavirus come from? There is a new investigation into its origins. US Intelligence officials tell NBC News that they are examining whether the virus accidentally came from a Chinese lab. Speaker 0: Chinese officials pushing back against that claim on Thursday, Tweeting that it might be the US Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Speaker 7: I was the first person in the world To look at an epidemic and study its characteristics and prove that it was due to biological warfare and was not a natural occurrence. So I published that 28 years ago. Early in this pandemic, I did not think the coronavirus was a natural occurrence from bats. I feel quite convinced that this was a laboratory designed organism. There have been hundreds and hundreds of leaks From high containment laboratories that do research on pathogenic coronaviruses and other potentially lethal organisms. I was particularly interested in a paper that came out in Nature Medicine by 5 scientists claiming that it was Definitely a natural occurrence rather than a lab construct. But the arguments they used did not hold water. They didn't really make a lot of scientific sense, and yet all kinds of very important people started parroting what this paper said. And so that, of course, got me scratching my head saying, why are these people risking their reputation when it's Obviously, illogical, you know, doesn't hold water. Somebody must have made them publish this, and Somebody must have told these other people that they have to say it's it's a great piece of science. Speaker 8: You were quoted as saying It was a meticulous job done professionally. Speaker 9: It could be done by some somebody very expert in molecular biology, I think. Speaker 0: See, the problem with All of this is the evidence is right in front of our face. And when confronted with evidence, we are told fact checkers are somehow transcendent. Speaker 8: The pace of our modern world makes it nearly impossible for working people to research the events And policies that shaped their lives. When seeking answers to life's most pressing questions, where do we go first? Google. Enter the subject. Hit go. And there it is, only what they want us to see. In today's culture of copy and paste journalism, it's common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same report. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design. When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical Mine concludes, well then, it must be true. The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative. And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. Search engines are the holy grail for those Seeking to control the narrative. Speaker 10: Google is already more powerful in terms of its control over people's lives Then almost every government on the planet. Speaker 8: As the most influential search engine in the world, through its ubiquitous reach, Google has more power to influence US elections than any foreign nation. Speaker 11: You testified before this committee. You said in subsequent elections, Google and Facebook and Twitter and big text manipulation could manipulate as many as 15,000,000 votes in a subsequent election? Speaker 5: And the methods that they're using are invisible. They're subliminal. They're more powerful than Most any effects I've ever seen in the behavioral sciences, and I've been in the behavioral sciences for almost 40 years. Speaker 8: Facebook's Fact checking arm, PolitiFact, is owned by the Poynter Institute, which has received substantial funding from big pharma allies such as Google And the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Like Snopes, PolitiFact has a history of misleading the public. In late January 2019, PolitiFact, Snopes, and factcheck.org raced to squash the notion that coronavirus and its treatments were patented. They reviewed But only 3 of the 4,452 publicly available patents, which unmistakably show that SARS coronavirus and treatment have been widely patented by both the public and private sectors. Speaker 6: Facebook's founder pledged to the WHO saying they would remove false Claims and block exploitative ads. They're working with the World Health Organization and with the NHS, so they have a hotline, if you like, from those Official sources. Speaker 8: Wikipedia is the go to destination for introductions to people, places, and things. Wikipedia supported by the Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit parent organization with a long history of politically tied funders. Many named, many anonymous. What exactly does a Wikipedia donor receive in exchange for their generosity? What began as an unbiased open source platform is now weaponized to undermine the work and reputation of anyone deemed a threat To its stakeholders. And once they smear you, they lock you out for making corrections to your own bio. In summary, most independent fact checkers are neither independent nor factual. Simply put, they are political spin machines. Speaker 0: And so what they have done is they have decided that there is an approved narrative. If it is in line with the CDC's public pronouncements and if it's in line with the World Health Organization public pronouncements, it is presumed to be correct. I don't have to remind many Americans that the Center For Disease Control was the one that said you should use DDT in your homes. Speaker 12: Used right, it is absolutely harmless to humans and animals. Remember the name DDT. It's spelled certain A Speaker 13: scientific panel today reported that pesticides may indeed Present a grave threat to mankind. Speaker 12: Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the US government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be killer, and Washington decided that every man, woman, and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a pandemic. Well, 46,000,000 of us obediently took the shot. Did anyone ever come to you and say, there's the possibility of neurological damage if You get into a mass immunization program. No. No one ever did. No. Speaker 11: I can't believe that they would say that they did not know that there were neurological Illnesses associated with influenza vaccination. That simply is not true. We did know that. And he's lying. Speaker 13: I guess you would have to, make that assumption. Then why Speaker 12: does this report from your own List neurological complications as a possibility. You didn't feel it was necessary to tell the American people that information. Doctor Censors' CDC also helped create the advertising to get the public to take the shot. The vaccines are safe, So roll up your sleeve. And now the Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to 3 and a half $1,000,000,000. By far, the greatest number of the claims, 2 thirds of them, are for neurological damage or even death. Speaker 14: There are serious Concerns tonight about how well the CDC controls dangerous germs at its own labs after yet another safety lapse. Speaker 8: For the 3rd time in a month, the CDC acknowledged deadly pathogens were handled incorrectly in government labs. Speaker 0: Not going to be able to get Speaker 3: a lot of people Speaker 0: to get a lot of people to get Speaker 3: a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get a lot of people to get Speaker 0: a lot of people Start with the assumption that the official dogma has to be the objective standard, then what fact checkers look for is a piece of published media that confirms the statement made by that particular organization. And then debunkers and conspiracy theorist blower uppers come in and say, Ah, we're gonna make this thing clearly the scam that it is. Every media outlet that is in the public media right now has planted evidence and they have re ranked pages. So if you look today at face mask wearing and if you look today at social distancing studies, you will see the studies that used to be number 1, number 2, number 3 on the pages of PageRank Search don't exist anymore. And what is there are studies that wind up having headlines that support the common narrative. They're planting evidence to back into the narrative of the story that they're looking for because it turns out that after every Single effort to disrupt the electoral process has failed. You suddenly have nature's gift, COVID 19. Speaker 9: You're gonna be hearing more about advanced guidelines. Speaker 0: Because if you can keep people from assembling, guess what they're not talking about? They're not talking about the issues of the campaign. If you can keep people in their homes, the only source of information that you can have is what you curate for them. Now I know how to target my electorate. They're in the only place I allowed them to be, being fed the only message I'm allowing them to hear through a media that I control. Speaker 8: Since the invention of the printing press, there's been a battle to control disseminated information. In the early 1900, oil tycoon John d Rockefeller took control of every newspaper and news editor of his era. Speaker 15: Here's a new and forthright put back on Moscow. Speaker 8: He became America's 1st billionaire, paving the way for the power hungry ever since. Thus began the gold rush for the modern world's most precious resource, the narrative. Speaker 4: Do you have any people Being paid by the CIA who are contributing to a major circulation American Journal. Speaker 8: During a senate committee investigation, it was revealed that the CIA had been conducting a covert operation to infiltrate and control US media. They called it Operation Mockingbird. Speaker 4: We do have people who submit pieces to American journals. Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television Networks. This, I think, gets into the kind of details, mister chairman, that I'd like to get into in executive session. Speaker 8: Over 3,000 CIA contracted and trained operatives were placed in key positions within top media outlets. Posing as editors and journalists, these well paid actors never dared to question the effect of their lives on the world beyond their cozy studio. Speaker 0: How often does the CIA manipulate the media in this way? Speaker 16: It goes beyond your Wildest imagination. Setting up student organizations so they could draw radical students in. 5000 university Professors co opted to help the CI manipulate people's minds. Journalists in the US, including big name journalists, Co opted to function routinely to help the CIA put out stories and biases to the world. Speaker 4: As this 1952 CIA memo says, the aim is controlling an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will. Speaker 15: It's a great brainwashing process to change the perception of reality of every American To such an extent, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their Their families, their community, and their country. Speaker 13: Would you say that continues today? Speaker 12: Well, I Speaker 13: yeah. I would think probably for A reporter that we continue today, but because of all of the revelations, I think you've gotta be much more careful about it. Speaker 17: So how do we know Speaker 6: that operation Mockingbird still isn't in effect? Well, we don't. Speaker 8: It was the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that opened the door for predatory corporations To monopolize the industries of print and broadcast. Speaker 18: This bill protects consumers against monopolies. It guarantees It's a diversity of voices. Speaker 8: Today, a handful of corporate empires own and control the vast majority of everything you read, hear, And watch from the biggest movie studios, television and radio networks, newspapers and magazines, to the vast universe of Internet news and entertainment sites. Speaker 0: Amazon has transformed its operations in response to COVID 19 to protect ratings on packages flowing. Protect employees and keep packages flowing. Speaker 2: And healthy while still delivering those packages to The company is keeping its employees safe and healthy. Employees safe and healthy. Millions of Americans staying at home. Speaker 6: Millions of Americans staying Speaker 2: We are the same. Amazon. Speaker 19: And that is how it works. It's like a house of mirrors Well, you're seeing the same thing over and over and over again, except it's distorted. Speaker 20: There's an industry that is paid to go after and target Journalists, whistleblowers, and inundate our consciousness and the images we see to try to ruin, destroy, or smear the idea that they don't like or the Person who's delivering it. Speaker 21: You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise And then you write it, and they'll say, see, it's reported in the press so they have that validation that the press reported The smear, and then it's called the wrap up smear. Now I'm gonna merchandise the press's report on the smear that we made. And it's it's a tactic. Speaker 17: Welcome back, everybody. Speaker 8: News personalities are not the only high paid actors to serve the propaganda machine. Most late night talk shows are owned by the same corporate overlords And thus follow the same script, only laced with a laugh. Speaker 22: Our main story tonight concerns conspiracy theories. Speaker 8: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver featured a skit entitled Coronavirus conspiracy theories. Speaker 22: But the claim that the moon landing was faked. Speaker 8: First thing to note here is that mister Oliver opens with commentary About conspiracy theories that are completely unrelated to coronavirus. This is a standard tactic used by propagandists to set a tone so that anything that follows will be seen Into the lens of absurdity. Speaker 22: Plandemic, a pseudo documentary filled with a hodgepodge of conspiracy theories. Speaker 8: Mister Oliver then does his best to debunk doctor Judy's claim That she was arrested, but never charged with a crime. Speaker 22: She was absolutely criminally charged. Speaker 8: This was not an oversight, but a blatant lie. Prior to the taping of this episode, mister Oliver had the official arrest documents that clearly proved that doctor Judy was never charged with a crime. Mister Oliver then attempts to debunk the idea that a beach, a k a nature, holds any value in boosting our body's natural immune system. Instead of challenging the point with science, he kills it with a smear. Speaker 22: Everything that you just said is insane. Speaker 17: Television is not the truth. We deal in illusions, man. None of it is true. But you people Sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creams, where all you know You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spending here. You're beginning to think that the tube is reality and that your own lives are unreal. This is Mass madness, you maniacs. In god's name, you people are the real thing. We are the illusion. So turn off your television sets. Turn them off now. Turn them off right now. Turn them off and leave them off. Turn them off Right in the middle of the sentence. I'm speaking to you now. Turn them off. Speaker 0: In 1979, the world decided that we needed the Bayh Dole Act because we needed to reform our patent system. And one of the modifications was we allowed Recipients of federal funding to patent and retain economic interest in the research that the public paid for. You get a $5,000,000 grant from the taxpayer, and then you get to charge the taxpayer a premium for the technology they paid to develop. Speaker 23: Pfizer's gonna get nearly 2,000,000,000 Moderna receiving $438,000,000 in taxpayer money. And yet both companies have said they will not Sell the vaccine at cost. They're gonna make a profit on it. Should pharmaceutical companies profit off this vaccine research The taxpayers have helped fund. Speaker 0: The Bayh Dole Act failed the American people because rather than standing on the shoulders of giants, we now kneel at the feet of greed. My systems flagged anomalies when I started seeing nonprofits and corporates and cover financing for coronavirus programs in the late summer and fall of 2019. Our first red flag came out when we read the world at risk scenario. Now there is an organization called the Global Monitoring Preparedness Board. This organization is a part of the World Health Organization, and this board includes doctor Elias from the Gates Foundation and Anthony Fauci from NIAID. These two individuals, plus the director of the Center For Disease Control in China, come out with a recommendation that says that by September 2020, 2 global pandemic preparedness exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen that then gave rise to an October event, event 201. Speaker 24: On behalf of our partners in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Speaker 8: Event 201 took place 5 months before COVID 19 was declared a pandemic. The participants of the event are some of the same people that are now deeply involved And the real pandemic and profiting from it as well. Event 201 was a scripted, multi camera live event That was broadcast globally via the Internet. An event of this complexity and magnitude would take months to write, prep, and produce, Placing the conception date at least 1 year prior to the actual pandemic. Speaker 0: There is no question that there will be a surprise outbreak. Speaker 8: Anthony Fauci knew as early as January of 2017 that we would see an outbreak before the end of 2020. Even Bill Gates, a man with no medical training, knew it was coming. Speaker 9: If we start now, we can be ready for the next epidemic. Speaker 0: Every single thing that you have seen play out in front of your eyes, all of them laid out in their tabletop exercise, which by the way fact checkers have said has nothing to do with the coronavirus outbreak. Just happenstance. This is that wonderful universe of improbabilities where events just co emerge, and then nature conveniently backs itself into our architecture. That's that's the scenario we're supposed to accept. Brilliant. Speaker 25: Some countries have banned travel from the worst affected areas. Speaker 4: The president has made a decision to spend all travel to the United Kingdom and Ireland. Speaker 23: Dis and misinformation circulating over the Internet. Speaker 26: Across the world, misinformation about the virus is being shared online. Speaker 25: A significant demand for n 95 masks and gloves are on the rise. Speaker 27: The demand for n 95 masks to prevent the deadly airborne virus has surged. Speaker 0: We could eventually have 52,000,000 treatment versus per year, but it will take many months to get there. Speaker 6: We're still many months out from having something that we can really deploy to the public. Speaker 25: And 65% of Those polled are eager to take the vaccine even if it's experimental. Speaker 6: The new poll finds that 49% of Americans say they would get a COVID 19 vaccine should an effective 1, be discovered. Speaker 8: I'm curious. Who wrote the event 2 zero one script? The visionaries of the event knew at least 1 year in advance what was needed. Why didn't they take care of those things? Considering that Bill Gates has donated half of his fortune to make the world safer, why didn't he help to better prepare our hospitals and frontline workers? Why didn't any of the event's wealthy sponsors do something? Speaker 9: Now here we are. You know, we we didn't simulate this. We didn't practice. Speaker 24: On behalf of our partners, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Speaker 9: So both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory. Speaker 8: Event 201 was not the first scripted exercise to prophesize the future with astonishing accuracy. Leaders of global health and business have been seeding reality with fictional scenarios for several decades. Speaker 24: The scenario, obviously, is fictional. Speaker 8: 1 year prior to event 201, many of the same sponsors, hosts, and actors Came together to produce a tabletop pandemic simulation for a fictional virus they branded, clade x. Speaker 14: 1 year to produce a vaccine for this is too long. Speaker 5: We should have stockpiled. We didn't. But we're gonna have to look at that vaccine question to see if we can speed up the delivery. Speaker 2: And if we do not have the public with us, We're in big trouble. Speaker 8: In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation released a 54 page document called Scenarios for the future of technology and international development. Page 18 features the pandemic scenario, lockstep. A world of tighter top down government control and authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. China's government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, National leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face mask to body temperature checks At the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens And their activities stuck and even intensified. Speaker 26: It's the United Nations in lockstep with the World Economic Forum. And what they are boasting will be the great reset of all our economies and have all our personal liberty. Speaker 17: Now is the historical moments of time. Speaker 28: This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. Speaker 29: It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have a gain. We must Not miss this unique window of opportunity. Speaker 30: Reading from the COVID 19, The Great Reset book by Klaus Schwab and his coauthor, If no one power can enforce order, our world will suffer from a global order deficit. Think about that. Reread that sentence. If no one power can enforce order, our world will suffer from a global order deficit. In short, Speaker 29: we need a great reset. Speaker 15: But Speaker 26: how do the World Economic Forum and the United Nations intend to bring This great reset, they keep promising us. Well, they need national and state governments and other bodies way along. And one of the key tools they are using is a 3 word slogan. Build back better. Speaker 6: We will build back better from the COVID Access. Speaker 2: Build it back better. Speaker 10: To come back stronger and build back better. Speaker 28: Build Canada back better. Speaker 26: Build back better has, bizarrely, been the Logan for all sorts of different political groups around the world. Bill Clinton used it to promote the Clinton Foundation after the Haiti hurricane in disaster. Speaker 18: The recent cholera outbreak serves as a stark reminder of the urgency we face to address the strength and reconstruction efforts in Haiti To help the people build back better. Speaker 13: Haitian activists staged a protest outside Hillary Clinton's Manhattan office. The demonstrators claimed 1,000,000,000 of dollars were stolen through the Haiti construction commission headed by Bill Clinton. They also say Haiti was used as a cover for foreign governments, a funnel kickbacks of possibly 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars through the Clinton Foundation. Speaker 27: Given that Clinton himself was the one who who coined this term build back better. There's been very little transparency and accountability despite all these Buzzwords, you know, sustainable development community consultation. Speaker 26: Any disaster can be the perfect excuse to build back better by using the money that should be going to disaster relief to instead subsidize the UN agenda at the same time as making renewables investors very rich. Speaker 31: So behind the great Haiti disaster story. That is used to cover up what big pharma, big oil, Big bank is actually doing. Speaker 30: The absolute first thing we have to keep in mind with the great reset is that this has Absolutely nothing to do with any sort of virus or disease or anything of the sort. This is a coordinated agenda that has been years in the making. This this isn't meant to end. Speaker 26: The so called great reset, which is deliberately designed to strip away your liberties and your rights using the tools of oppression and the opportunity provided by the COVID pandemic. Speaker 3: Here we are now with an economy in crisis, but with an incredible opportunity Not just to build back Speaker 18: to where we were before, Speaker 32: but better. Speaker 0: We are living in a time where leadership unfortunately is compromised. And by that, I mean that individuals are placed in power for their ability to be influenced, not their merits of leadership. Nothing could be clearer than the leadership of the World Health Organization. Speaker 8: The World Health Organization is the institution granted exclusive power to guide and protect the health Health and wellness of humanity. The WHO is sustained by private donations, the bulk of which are made by pharmaceutical and biotech corporations Who have a vested financial interest in the organization's support. In 2017, the Associated Press reported that the WHO Routinely spends about 200,000,000 a year on travel expenses, more than what it spends to fight some of the biggest problems in public health, Including AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria combined. The WHO's repeated issuing of inaccurate and bad advice is not merely the result of incompetence, but rather the direct result of the Communist Party of China deliberately buying out Hu's leadership. Speaker 33: On the nomination of the executive board appoints doctor Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus As director general of the World Health Organization. Speaker 8: Tedros Ghebreyesus is the World Health Organization's first director general that isn't a medical doctor. Speaker 17: No Tedros for WHO. No Tedros for WHO. Speaker 8: The appointment to the organization's highest position was controversial Given that in his previous role as Ethiopian's health minister, Tedros was accused of covering up 3 major health epidemics. Speaker 34: Tedros is no stranger to controversy. As a former minister of health in Ethiopia, he has been accused of an alleged cover up of 3 possible cholera epidemics. Speaker 8: Prior to his appointment, Tedros was a high ranking member of the Tigray People's Liberation Front, a brutal and corrupt political group responsible for crimes against humanity, including bombings, Kidnappings, tortures, and killings. How does a man with such a controversial past score the top position at the world's most influential health organization? Speaker 15: I have known Bill and Melinda for for many, many years now. Speaker 8: While serving as Ethiopia's health minister, Tedros became intimately intertwined with both the Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. Speaker 3: The health minister Speaker 18: of Ethiopia, one of the Through Ethiopia, one of the ablest public servants I ever worked with. Speaker 8: With the backing of the 2 most Powerful foundations on Earth and the full support of the Communist Party of China, Tedros was a shoo in. Speaker 15: We will have Many body bags in front of us if we don't behave. Speaker 0: You cannot find a person promoting this scenario that's not part of the interlocking directorates of the World Health Organization, the CDC, the NIAID, or the organizations that are the philanthropic cover organizations that fund them. We now know that there are over 1300 patents currently issued and held by organizations that are multiple recipients of funding through the Gates Foundation, through EcoHealth Alliance, through the Sherlock Biosciences connection back into open philanthropy. And all of them also have links directly to NIAID Anthony Fauci's funding sources. If you have conflicts of interest in the funding and in the decision making and in the inside knowledge that you have between competing or competitor organizations, that is a violation of the antitrust laws of the United States. These are federal crimes. Speaker 8: If you have the power to immediately fix whatever is wrong with our current medical system, where would you start? Speaker 7: Conflicts of interest. About 40 or 50 years ago, pharmaceutical CEOs actually went to jail if they knowingly sold A bad product and concealed information about the problems with that product. Since then, all they have done is paid fines. And so Selling a product and concealing information about it is okay because paying the fine is considered the Cost of doing business. How did the pharmaceutical industry come to capture the rest to the medical industry, and it's because they had so much money to bribe the NIH, the CDC, the FDA, the professional Associations, you know, the journals, the medical schools, and everyone else. Speaker 8: Around the same time that John d Rockefeller seized US media, He also hijacked US Medicine. When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, While the new petroleum based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence By pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities, unscientific quackery. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association And began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. Speaker 12: There might hope to them for the sick. Speaker 8: Any Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plan were crucified by the media, Removed from the AMA and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine, those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, mister Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society Through which he suppressed that information. John d Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry And the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors. Big Oil, to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to mister Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies. No industry has more power over our lives than big pharma. Speaker 0: Part of the problem, and this, by the way, goes back to the 1980s with Microsoft, is Bill Gates found out that it was very difficult to manufacture a way to navigate through the patent universe, saying that it's Microsoft holding the patents. And he became the architect of a very cunning program of putting patents in holding companies that didn't have anything to do with the name of the organization. Speaker 8: According to legend, young Bill Gates built his computer empire out of his garage. Reality tells another story, that Bill Gates was born into wealth and privilege. Both his grandfather and great grandfather were banking muggles. His father, William Gates senior, was a prominent Seattle based lawyer and political lobbyist. Through his father, Bill Gates learned the ins and outs of law and politics and how to manipulate those governing forces. Speaker 5: I'm Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft. Speaker 8: Bill Gates dropped out of college to start Microsoft. He is credited with inventing the operating system that became Windows. However, he played no part in the invention of Windows. The fact is, he bought an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products, Had it modified, then licensed it to IBM. That didn't stop him from taking all the credit. Speaker 13: I don't see Bill Gates as this great creative person. I see him as an opportunist. Speaker 8: While Microsoft's cofounder Paul Allen was struggling with cancer, Bill Gates seized the opportunity By attempting to cheat him out of his share of the company's fortune. Speaker 35: They were basically talking about how they were planning to dilute my share down to almost nothing. And it was, you know, really a shocking and disheartening moment for me. Speaker 36: And you were sick? Speaker 35: Well, I think I was still probably in the middle of radiation therapy. Speaker 8: Gates' business strategies came under fire in 1998 When the United States Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations Speaker 0: This is take 3 of the videotape deposition of Bill Gates. Speaker 8: During the 18 month trial, Gates gave hours of videotaped testimony. Speaker 37: What were the non Microsoft browsers that You were concerned about in January of 1996? That month. Speaker 5: Yes, sir. And what about Speaker 37: it? What non Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in January of 1996? Speaker 3: I don't know. Speaker 5: What do you mean concerned? Speaker 37: What is it about the word concerned Speaker 12: that you don't understand. Speaker 5: I'm not sure what you mean by it. Speaker 6: The justice department has charged Microsoft with engaging in anti competitive and exclusionary practices designed to maintain its monopoly late. And personal computer operating systems. Speaker 8: In a move to overshadow the negative press, Gates invested $100,000,000 to set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Overnight, Bill Gates transformed his public image From ruthless tech monopolizer to the world's most generous philanthropist. Speaker 9: I'm pleased to announce that we're pledging an additional $1,000,000,000 just a sec. Speaker 12: We had the chance to witness Bill Gates 2.0, the man you don't know. Speaker 8: The rebranding campaign paid off. His net worth swiftly doubled, earning Bill Gates the title of richest man in the world. Speaker 38: You've invested $10,000,000,000 in vaccinations over the last 2 decades, and you figured out the return on investment for that. It kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math? Speaker 8: In a Wall Street essay, Bill Gates declared vaccines The best investment I've ever made. Speaker 9: There's been over a 20 to 1 return. So if you just looked at the economic benefits, that's a pretty strong number compared to anything else. Speaker 8: The Gates Foundation expanded rapidly into a massive vertically integrated multinational corporation Controlling every step in a supply chain that reaches from its Seattle based boardrooms to the villages of Africa and Asia. Speaker 39: Is the world's largest private philanthropy Causing harm. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has made 1,000,000 of dollars each year from companies blamed for many of the Same social and health problems the foundation seeks to address. The Gates Foundation has investments in 69 of the worst polluting companies in the US and Canada. Other companies in the foundation's portfolio have been accused of transgressions, including forcing thousands of people to lose their homes, supporting child labor, Frauding and neglecting patients in need of medical care. The Gates Foundation has not provided details. Speaker 0: William h Gates the third in Melinda French Gates. Speaker 8: As a top donor to both the WHO and the CDC, no one man has more power than Bill Gates to influence and control The health and medical freedom of all people. Speaker 9: Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population. Speaker 28: This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed. Speaker 13: Until we find a vaccine, Going back to normal means putting lives at risk. Speaker 40: We need to produce it Speaker 36: and to deploy it in every single corner of the world. Speaker 41: Full vaccination Of our children and pregnant women. Speaker 8: Development of new vaccines, therapeutics, and Speaker 2: diagnostics. And the Speaker 23: infectious vaccines and therapeutics are developed. Vaccines Speaker 6: We've already bought The syringes, we already know where it's gonna happen. We're thinking about what that's going to be. It's all part of this plan. Speaker 4: Our military is now being mobilized. So at the end of the year, we're gonna be able to give it to a lot of people very, very rapidly. Speaker 8: In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, granting total immunity to vaccine manufacturers. After a decade of lawsuits related to vaccine injuries and deaths, vaccine makers were going bankrupt. In a move to coerce policy makers, Vaccine companies threatened to stop making vaccines until they could be legally shielded from liability. To this day, When someone is injured or killed as the result of an adverse reaction, it is the US taxpayers that pay for the damages. Speaker 42: Welcome back. Were several Indian tribal girls used as guinea pigs? The report alleges that 2 American pharma giants Untested vaccine was administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study and paperwork. Speaker 8: India was among the hardest hit after Bollywood celebrities were incentivized by the Gates Foundation To urge the public to submit to mass vaccinations. In 2009, tribal children were administered the HPV vaccine. Over 24,000 girls were told they were being given wellness shots, in many cases, without the informed consent of a parent or a guardian. Speaker 43: The people that were administering these vaccines lied to the guardians of these girls and told the girls, oh, this is gonna or cancer. You're never gonna have cancer. And these girls became severely injured. Some of them developed seizures. Some of them developed cancer. And 7 girls died, and there was no insurance. There was no assistance for them, and the Gates Foundation denied that it had been clinical trials. And it was so bad that the parliament in India created a task force. They studied it, and they kicked out the Gates Foundation. Speaker 41: But India is a barbaric country. Things happen here in a very barbaric way, but I was surprised to find an American organization Operating in broad daylight, doing things in a very, very, let's say, Indian fashion. And so the route I took was that I want the whole procedure to be investigated. The Indian parliament formed a committee, and it was to be a rather surprising move because you generally don't often have Such a high level inquiry into matters affecting poor people. And that was such an extraordinary report. I don't think Indian parliament has ever come out with such a scathing report. And the government officials Came up and said, we shouldn't have authorized this. We're sorry. We're not going to allow them again. And now they are back Doing the same old tricks again. Speaker 44: The good news is that human clinical trials can start As early as July 2020 for India's first COVID 19 indigenous vaccine that's been developed by Bharat Biotech. Speaker 41: So you can imagine how The manipulation of the media by the media, the manipulation of public opinion by leaders of all political parties He's unanimously saying, we want a vaccine. And the worst thing is they are taken as philanthropists. Whereas what this actually is There's the acquisition of political and financial power. And I think the second most populous country With 1,300,000,000 people is going to be a good base for pharmaceutical companies to make a killing And also kill a lot of people in the process. Yes. I just find it a pity that we haven't been able to Get any benefit for the girls who suffered, you know. It's so terrifying as to what they're actually doing with the world. Speaker 9: We're taking things that are, you know, genetically modified organisms, and we're injecting them in little kids' arms. We just soon right into the vein. Speaker 8: A 2018 scientific study released in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluded that Over 490,000 children in India developed paralysis as a result of the gate supported oral polio vaccine that was administered between the years of 2,021,017. Using all the usual slight of hand, US based media and fact checkers rushed to bury the story. But thanks to the meticulous work of a team of Indian researchers and doctors, The inconvenient truth lives on the nih.gov website. Speaker 0: It's my honor to introduce Bill and Melinda Gates. Speaker 8: Without any medical training, Bill and Melinda Gates founded the Global Alliance For Vaccines and Immunization, through which they fulfill their agenda to vaccinate the world. The foundation has been sued by the governments of some of the poorest and most vulnerable nations For causing serious harm through experimental vaccine programs. Speaker 45: If you just look at health care workers around the world, they deserve to get the vaccine first. Speaker 6: You know, here Speaker 45: in the United States, really, it's going to be black people who really should get it first and many indigenous people. Speaker 46: Vaccines were always Taught to us that it was safe. It was it was healthy. This is things that we had to do. But given the position that I am in now as a state legislator In looking at these studies and reviewing a lot of these studies, it's very scary, and I want the African American community to open up their eyes. Speaker 47: Of all the places that mister Gates could have gone in the world, why did he settle on Africa? It's not because he cares about people that look like me. He cares about an agenda. Speaker 7: African bodies have been used as lab rats for many years for big pharma. They are using us for trials. They are using us for testing. But as an African, I say no more. Speaker 48: Africans, they're tired of becoming the guinea pigs of the world. Their antennas are raised, and they are telling each other All over social media, they're on high alert right now. Speaker 49: There is a policy of the American government. It's called the Kissinger report, which was produced in the mid seventies, and it explicitly states That, the purpose of the foreign policy in Africa was to, reduce the the population because they have a great mineral resources there. And the time Kissinger and those involved with the Carter administration wanted to shrink the population, make sure that the Africans do not develop And do not use the resources for themselves because we in the States, we need them. There is a a concerted effort of foreign powers to, control the population of Africa. Speaker 50: Some children did survive the botched vaccinations last month and will recover, but 15 all under the age of 5 died from fever, vomiting, and diarrhea. Human errors Speaker 30: contributed to the unfortunate deaths Speaker 28: of the children. Speaker 48: How can you believe big pharma but not believe these parents when they tell you that their children have been injured by big pharma? I don't care how big this corporate machine looks. As a parent, I can tell you these people will never stop fighting for their kids. Speaker 8: It would take Hours to list all of the questionable initiatives that Bill Gates is involved in. Here's a few of the highlights. Gates is one of the key funders in In the stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment designed to block out the sun in an effort to control global warming by releasing massive amounts of calcium carbonate and other materials into the upper atmosphere. Critics, including environmental scientists, have called the project a Global genocide experiment. Gates has invested over $1,000,000,000 in Earth Now's global surveillance project. The project will launch 100 the satellites into space, which will allow for the 247 monitoring of all people everywhere. In partnership with MIT, Bill Gates has Developed a new technology that allows vaccines to be injected under your skin along with your medical records. The Quantum dot tattoo will implant an invisible certificate that can be scanned by authorities using a cell phone app and infrared light. Speaker 9: Eventually, what we'll have to have is certificates of who's a recovered person, who's a vaccinated person. So, eventually, there will be this digital immunity Proof. Speaker 8: The EPA recently approved an experimental use permit to Oxitec, a biotech company funded by the Bill Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. In an effort to fight malaria, Oxitec will soon release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes in various US states. According to the NIH site. Programs are being developed to allow human immunization via mosquito bite. It was Science Magazine that coined the phrase flying syringes. Speaker 2: Sheds light on the connection between Microsoft founder Bill Gates and the late Jeffrey Epstein. You report these 2 Speaker 51: men met at least Six tons. Speaker 52: Well, I believe that there were more. This included visits to the mansion, seeing each other in Seattle, Flying on Epstein's plane. Speaker 8: When flight logs revealed that Gates had been a passenger on the Lolita Express, He claimed that he didn't know that the private jet belonged to Epstein. He also denied that he and mister Epstein were involved in any business deals. However, an expose by The New York Times revealed that not only did Bill Gates initiate a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein well after he was convicted of sex crimes, But the 2 were also involved in the process of co founding a multi $1,000,000,000 charitable fund. Speaker 2: Why would they ever set up a charitable trust benefiting Jeffrey State. Speaker 52: That it was all about philanthropy, that Bill Gates just wanted to find new sources of money. Speaker 8: Why would one of the richest men in the world Choose to partner with the world's most notorious pedophile. Speaker 53: It's the great hope galvanizing the world. A vaccine for COVID nineteen. But are we being sold for COVID 19. But are we being sold aligned? After all, COVID is the 7th coronavirus to strike mankind, and we've never found a vaccine for any of them. Speaker 18: The shortest time Speaker 3: anybody's ever found a vaccine against any Speaker 32: disease that I'm familiar ever found a vaccine against any disease that I'm familiar with is about 7 years. The average time is 20. To be talking about a magic bullet coming in months, it borders on the absurd. Speaker 9: People like myself and Tony Fauci are saying 18 months. Speaker 37: A year Speaker 9: to a year and a half. If everything went perfectly, we could do slightly better than that, but there will be a trade off. We'll have less safety testing than we Typically would have, and so governments will have to decide, you know, do they indemnify the companies and really say let's let's go out with this. Speaker 23: All across The country began getting shots today as part of the final phase of testing for an experimental vaccine being developed by the NIH and the drug company Moderna. The side effects for the Moderna vaccine sound concerning. We looked. After the second dose, at least 80% of participants experienced a systemic side effect. So are these Seemed safe. Speaker 9: Well, the, the FDA not being pressured will Look hard at that. The FDA is the gold standard of regulators, and their current guidance on this, If they stick with that, it's it's very, very appropriate. And, you know, The the the the side effects were not super severe. That is, it didn't cause permanent health problems for, Speaker 37: the Entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are they are Toxic and lethal to an end ineffective that they have completely failed. They can only be viewed as harmful and they need to be stopped. Speaker 54: And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Does it damage the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts of harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. Speaker 0: If your goal is to make this beautiful earth that we live on an exclusive playground for the entitled few, then populations that get in the way are a problem. Loan. And it is the empirical impulses of individuals who have decided that by outranking the rest of humanity, they can dictate paid upon humanity the conditions of their existence. Speaker 9: Well, this won't be the last pandemic that we face. So we, You know, we'll have to prepare for the next one. That, you know, I'd say is, will get attention this time. Mhmm. Speaker 0: This is our moment to reclaim our humanity.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

AI WHAT WILL IT MEAN: Will it be used to cull the human race? What will synthetic biology (mRNA) do for humanity? Will nano technology leave tiny robots to replicate in our souls? Designing robots a fraction of the size of a red blood cell capable of swimming through our bodies. Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca Covid Vaccine vial contents exposed by WHO whistleblower. It contains graphene oxide, parasites, RFID, metals and nano circuitry. DARPA and Bill Gates developed these non biological synthetic injections to control the minds and bodies of the population. Dr. Charles Morgan formerly with the CIA in a 2018 DARPA meeting talking to the U.S. Military about mRNA CRISPR gene editing technology says they can engineer a "unique thing" to kill only one person in the world. In this case they used this mRNA technology to kill millions of innocent people in the world. This is why through the PCR test they took everyone's DNA and put it in a database in order to target specific people and races in the future, not only to kill them, but to control their thoughts and actions. This RFID is in the Pfizer mRNA injections which are found in dead bodies and in the cemeteries. Scientists through autopsies show there is a parasite in the vaccine that lays an egg that bursts out and something comes out with tentacles. Experts through evidence confirm the mRNA injections are synthetic injection nano circuits that work with 5G. It's beyond what doctors know and what normal scientists know. We have to get every engineer and every military veteran who knows about nanoparticles, nanotechnology to help us understand this, because we have to know how to detach this from the body. Pfizer Covid Vaccines contain never before seen objects in the blood of the vaccinated that interact with mobile phones. Study confirms the mRNA injections cause the human body to produce a Mac Address. Pascal Najadi says "I am chipped" by the Pfizer vaccine. Ana Mihalcea MD, PhD states "The mRNA injections, is a cover story for an Artificial Intelligence frequency based gene modification system that is self learning and can decide how to edit that human." They are using digital technology and AI to control people. Pascal Najada who has a Pfizer Covid Vaccine criminal case against the Swiss President in conjunction with a New York Supreme Court Pfizer and FDA lawsuit confirms he has been "chipped" by the Pfizer mRNA injections. At 35,000 feet in the airplane his phone scanned 650 transceivers of only 100 passengers. He says "IT" tried to take over and kill humanity, but "IT" has failed and "IT" will be brought to justice. Dr. Charles Morgan formerly with the CIA in a 2018 DARPA meeting is talking with the U.S. Military about how cells can be designed for specific activities and targets using DREADDs technology, cells can be strategically placed in the brain with no surgery and then the cells can be remotely controlled using a wireless interface. A scientific study done at a remote location with vaccinated, unvaccinated and PCR tested participants confirms the vaccinated and PCR tested produce a Mac Address which is a Media Access Control Address that sometimes disappears if the code is trying to be accessed and reappears depending on the situation. It is not in the vials but uses the human DNA to create the MAC Address signal. There are now nanosensors in millions if not billions of people worldwide. Bill Gates and Microsoft are involved in using human DNA as a programmable material through mRNA vaccines. Humanity has been used as guinea pigs in the greatest and most horrific experiments in the world killing millions of innocent people worldwide. Matt Hancock's secret chats reveal he knew the vaccines contained nanotechnology which he refers to as a "Chip" which he injected into millions of people and Bill Gates owes him one for doing this. Everyone in the world was lied to about the Covid vaccines by the corrupt politicians and elites who destroyed humanity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the potential implications of AI, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, and neural interface technology. It raises questions about the positive and negative impacts of these technologies on society, such as robots caring for the elderly or limbless chickens on our tables. The speakers also discuss the presence of graphene oxide and nanoparticles in vaccines, as well as the potential control and manipulation of human minds and bodies through nanotech and 5G technology. They emphasize the need for further investigation and understanding of these technologies and their effects on humanity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: AI. What will it mean? Helpful robots washing and caring for an aging population or pink eyed terminator sent back from the future to cull the human race. What will synthetic biology stand for restoring our livers and our eyes with miracle regeneration of the tissues like some fantastic hangover cure or will it bring terrifying limbless chickens to our tables? Will nanotechnology help us to beat disease or will it live leave tiny robots to replicate in the crevices of our souls. It is a a trope or would it live leave tiny robots to replicate in the crevices of our souls. It is a a trope nanotechnology, I mentioned earlier. Revolutionizing medicine by designing robots a fraction of the size phase of a red blood cell capable of swimming through our bodies, dispensing medicine, and attacking malignant cells like some Star Wars Armada. Neural interface technology, nanotechnology, I mentioned earlier. Revolutionizing medicine by designing robot robots a fraction of the size of a red blood cell capable of swimming through our bodies, dispensing medicine and attacking malignant cells was like some Star Wars Armada. Neural interface technology. Your understanding of the natural world is being transformed by genome sequencing. The discovery of the very essence of life itself. The secret genetic code that animates the spirit of every living being and allows medical breakthroughs the like of which we have never known. Treatments tailored to the precise genetic makeup of the individual. How we design the emerging technologies behind these breakthroughs, and what values inform their design will shape the future of humanity. And that is my point to you tonight, my friends, excellencies. Speaker 1: I want to answer To, you know, what is in the job and what's going on with the 5 g? You know, the question that Pascal said, ask Astrid. Because it's very important. I I've been into one of the first ones who really read and and said there is oxide Graphene, some Scientists in in Spain, professor Compra found, you know, massive oxide, graphene, and nanoparticle in the job in, yeah, June 2021. And then he made another report final in November 2021. And then others made, like professor Arne Burkhart made where scientific really, in in the lab of like a medical, analysis of the job. And he did in front of lawyers, he said, this is a crime against humanity, and he he anybody jabbing this thing is is Pfizer. It was Pfizer, is is a criminal. And he found ox he confirmed oxide graphene. He confirmed, parasites. He confirmed metal, chrome, nickel that should never be there, all massively nanoparticle. And then he also confirmed there is a RFID type of thing thing in in there. So he he did a very interesting move. He he took lawyers To say and to affirm. Now there are others, and it's very interesting, you know, how we go in a creamy scene. We we have one more element, one more, some contradictory, some not. A lot of people are talking of mRNA, mRNA spike, mRNA. But they never really give the nature of this mRNA. And, 2 scientists started to do the whistle blowing, Doctor Nagazi in Canada and doctor Monteverde and for me, that was a key to this crimicine. And they said that to For something to be biological, you need phosphor and nitrogen, and they found nothing like that in all the vials they saw, and it was confirmed again after. So it's not biological. What is in this little vial is not biological. So what is it? It is synthetic, nanotech Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: And and and beyond. Maybe other things we don't know. You see, I I leave it open because We are in such a crazy situation of evil that we have to, be open so that we can stop and and and treat people. So so now in the scientific community where I speak a lot, you know, in in conference, I show the graphic of First question, is it biological or not? It's not. It's synthetic. In correspondence with what David Martin said, I should never have accepted Those patents, they're all synthetic, not biological. Then you you start explaining but if you explain mRNA, you have to define if it is synthetic Or not. You have to say, is it a nanorobot you call mRNA? Or do you call mRNA the consequence of a causality and the causality Is something synthetic and like a robot, which I think that is. The mRNA spike is only an effect or, an element Of this nano circuit and nanotech, because it's not possible that spike protein is everywhere in the body after an injection. So it is a transporter oxide, Graphene, who is like a a flying carpet type. I've I've made a report on that, flying carpet. And it's, you can put a genome. You can put a parasite. You can put a bacteria. And you can code it. And it mimics the code of a molecule because we have the codes of molecules with, doctor Benoit Vist in in France. And professor Montaigne tried to steal all his findings, and then he got killed. You know, so we know that biocoding exists since 50 years, But it's become very sophisticated now, and they can send this bio code to the oxide graphene. It's a terahertz. It can stock you probably know that. It can load the data up to terahertz, and it can send it. And so it is like computer. Bill Gates is perfectly suited, you know, with his engineers to develop this with DARPA. So so we know this, that this can take control of the mind and of the body. And I invite everybody who has not seen this fantastic video Of, doctor Charles Morgan of DARPA, and he's teaching on YouTube, the military, How you oxide Graphene can take command of someone on the other side of Earth through Wi Fi, and it's called Psycho, neurobiology, and war. I don't you've seen it? Speaker 3: MWI speaker event for the few of you that can make it. Today we have doctor Charles Voorhey coming to talk to us about neuroscience and psychology and all all gamut of things. Right now, he is a professor of national security studies at University New Haven. This focus is teaching, national security studies, domestic international intelligence, analysis, and issues exception. Doctor Morgan is developing a concentration in the human aspects, intelligence analysis, and psycho psychological operations arenas that are relevant to the intelligence community. He has a pretty robust background with military folks, doing research at Sears School, helping with selection processes for special operation courses For brag, etcetera, etcetera. So without further ado, I will hand it off. Speaker 4: So what I would like to talk to you a little bit about today is Something I was asked to do in 2010 and 2011, I was getting ready to leave over at CIA where I'd worked For a number of years, and the intelligence science board said, could you give us a brief on what's in what's in store for us in the future? I was like, I don't know. Predicting the future is really hard. So I told my boss at the time. I said, well, I think the best I'll do is make an estimate over what I think is gonna happen in the next 5 years, given certain technologies that were being developed at the time, and this is a bit of an extension of that. I presented it to the ASG, and, it was Some information I think some people didn't know, and I think the it's good for people to be aware of what's going on out there. The the one thing that makes Predicting a little bit of the future easier when you look at biomedical science is that labs are working fairly systematically with overtly stated goals. But the really fun part was that you're taking over somebody else's physical body with the mind of another human. So what do you think would be the next step? You follow medical research. You say you can make a robot move. You can make a human hand move. What would you do next? You say, wow, they're getting brains connected to run things. I have to begin to think Either like doctors or like, you know, security and intelligence people. Right? Can you actually send And receive sensory information like the matrix. Doctor Ventnor's work is my my view the equivalent of The development of nuclear weapons when you realize, that he created life in a cell back in 2010. I don't know if people are familiar with his work, but this technology paired with something called CRISPR, which is like an editing software for genes, makes a number of things Immediately available. What he did is he programmed yeast cells to produce anything he wanted. They can produce perfume. They can produce petroleum. They can produce any peptide, anything we program the DNA to do, and it's in the living cell. Right? So in medicine, the goal in medicine now Is to be able to do, designer medicine and therapy. If we can design a cell to get into your body And release the right product for you. You won't be losing half the drugs you take through your liver when you swallow a pill and it gets digested. These can be inserted into you through the hypospray, needles, almost like doctor McCoy on Star Trek. Spray. It just blasts now plasmids into your squamous cells. But, Ventnor was able to do that and has the patent on the technology. But you can engineer anything. You can engineer a unique thing that would only kill 1 person in the world. You can engineer a unique thing that would only kill 1 person in the world. You can engineer a unique thing that would only kill one person in the world. It's how it's done. You put in a specific gene slicing. You program what you like. You put it in the cell, and it can reproduce and make as much as you like. Speaker 1: It's very interesting. Yeah. Yeah. So When people are not convinced, I I show them go and see this, and you will understand already a bit. Go and see the pandemic, preparedness for zombies. You will understand. Go and see that the ID in, is is in the body of people who are dead and even in the cemetery. You know, and go and see at the autopsy that what they're taking out of the blood is something like cow chook, but nobody's really describing it. And I suspect they're afraid to say really what it is because they don't know. Because 1 there are 2 or 3 scientists who said something very interesting, that goes with this AI science plasma going around. It's it's that there is a parasite in as an egg. If you put it at the temperature of the body under microscope, it develops and the egg bursts out and something comes out with tentacles. And that's what you find in in the in the autopsy. So there is something to in the investigation we're going through, there's a lot To still, you know, go and and seek and to understand the causality of causality and not only talk of this mRNA. I'm fed up of this mRNA. It's a messenger. It's not more so I I got censored in Stockholm in a conference because I said, go and look at the genome editing, A document that WHO produced because this is important. But the cause of the cause is a synthetic injection with nano circuits that go on with 5 g. It's it's been it's been, you know, evidenced by experts who recognized and did it That it is a nano circuit. It is it's it's, it's beyond what doctors know, What normal scientists know, and we have to get every engineer in or or of veterans Who have who know anything about nanoparticles and nanotech to come and help us to understand what's going on Because we have to know how to, detach this from the body and clean. Speaker 5: I don't wanna scare people, but I I Can't lie to you. I can't withhold the truth from you. The problem that we have is that we don't know what this is going to do moving forward. These are new discoveries. We don't know how it's going to interact. If it's doing that when you turn on a mobile phone near it, how is it going to interact when you are surrounded by 5 g towers. Are you going to be able to think for yourself because Yuval Noah Harari, lead advisor to Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum says that humans are now hackable animals. And that the the technology, the dictators of the past only dreamed of having to control The people they're now able to do. How are they able to make a statement? How are these leaders of the Transhumanist agenda, able to make a statement like that unless they're actually able to do it, unless they have the technology to do this, to control you. How far does that control go? Will you even be able to know what is your thought or what's being implanted in you because you don't know what's been implanted with you? They I haven't told you that this was inside of you. This is an SOS message to all of humanity. We need to Stop these injections immediately before I I mean, I don't know. I don't know what's going to happen to people. Do not put this inside of your children until we have answers as to what this actually is. Before you go and do this to your children, Ask yourself, do I know what this is? Has my government told me that this is inside of me? And do I want this in my children? Because this has never been seen in blood work before in history. Speaker 6: Absolutely brilliant. And so what this is saying Is that the mRNA injection is a cover story for an artificial intelligence frequency based gene modification system firm that is self learning and that can decide how to edit that human. Did you just say that, Karen? Speaker 5: Yeah. Thank you for understanding. Speaker 7: And I know that, you know, recently, a former, director of central intelligence revealed that CIA did have a program to collect DNA overseas by using a vaccination program as a cover. There was a real vaccination program, But through this vaccination program, they were able to retrieve DNA from this region of the world. Yeah. So, that was was what was discussed. You can be sure, Speaker 2: and I think I'm not wrong, Again, that we're going to the heart of this it right now very fast. You know, whether or not 5g, 6g will influence my brain or not. I I don't believe in it. It is there. We have we researched it, and I have chipped. I I made a scan in the aircraft a week ago flying at 35,000 feet, and I was scanning 650 transceivers Of a 100 passengers, at 35,000 feet, there is no distraction. I'm not an engineer, but it's logic. So it tries to take over and kill humanity. It it has failed, And it will be brought to justice. And, this time, like in Nuremberg, where they escaped to America or Argentina with a submarine. No. No. No. No. No. It's over for them, for it. Speaker 4: Related to this is an idea called DREDS. These are designer receptors that can be remotely controlled. So think about it for a moment. You can create a designer receptor. You can create a cell. You can put it somewhere in the body, And you can remotely activate it when the brain's exposed to the right signal. Using this technology, people have been able to Transfer memories from 1 fruit fly to another by signaling through a light stimulus, into the retina. Right now in in most animals, it's done by putting a substance into their body, that will actually activate the neuron in the way that you want it. So you have the capacity to create any product. As long as you know the DNA sequence, you can insert it into a living system, and you can remotely control it. So in medicine, we think about how we do that to help people, how we do to repair deficits. Other people are gonna think about how do they do it to expand possibilities. And one of the challenges that we have is that when you create a cell and you put it in somebody's body, you have to figure out where you want it. What if you want it in their brain? Right? If you want it in their brain and you can't figure out you don't want to do surgery to plant it in their brain, if I want a product Produced in your brain that may affect the way you think, the way you act, one route to that is through, stem cells. Here, a quick brush up on your biology. Stem cells are cells. They call them god cells. They can turn into anything. They hold the potential, unlike other cells in your body, to become anything you want them to become. And they can go find their home in the body And park there and do the work that you'd like them to do. You can infuse them, and they will find their way into the brain. So once you know that the technology is there to edit, Splice and program the cell. And the technology currently exists to administer it to somebody and have it go park anywhere you program it to go park, proliferate, And do its function, you can have things activated in other people's brains. So if you take these three key points, hopefully, you can see it opens up a number of both alarming and exciting possibilities. Speaker 8: The MAC address or media access control, Media access code is a hexadecimal code that all electronic devices have, made up of 6 blocks of 2 hexadecimal characters They uniquely correspond to a network card or device. Many questions that we are entitled to know the answers to. The following week, I receive a call from France. A multidisciplinary research team is going to do the 1st large scale experiment on Matcos and people. To avoid any interference in the experiment, my team and I are summoned to the middle of a lost place in the French countryside. I had to see it with my own eyes. Her man's questions echo like a call for help in the middle of the French countryside. What are they trying to turn us into? In Almeria, I will find some of the answers. After several months of continuous messages and calls, I am going to meet Pablo Campra in person and to be able to see up close, through his microscope, The contents of the vials. Through the micro Raman technique, Pablo Campra manages to unequivocally demonstrate the presence of Graphene in several commercial brands of the so called vaccines against COVID 19. But as it often happens, the most important discovery would appear as a result of chance. A discovery that closes the circle of this enormous puzzle. The images from Kemper's microscope speak for themselves. Speaker 2: Imagine a world where we can do computation inside living cells. Speaker 4: In this project, we're trying to use DNA as a programmable material. Speaker 9: DNA is highly programmable just like a computer, And we can program a whole range of complex behaviors using DNA molecules. Speaker 8: When I embarked on this project, I never imagined that I would get this far. Now it is much easier to understand why a man who makes computers presents himself to us as the one who knows the most about pandemics. Bill Gates Predicts nothing. He knows what is going to happen. Behind him, there are series of bankers and technocrats who carry the world agenda, Who, in addition to knowing what is going to happen, have fun shoving it in our face before things happen. This is The Economist Magazine Owned by the Rothschild and Agnelli Banking family. The cover is from 2019, many months before the declaration of the pandemic. In it, tattoos with a DNA symbol can be seen, a mobile phone with a QR code, facial recognition symbols, Storks with children marked with a barcode. 1 of the 4 horsemen of the apocalypse is masked. And finally, the image of a pangolin. These elites have devised how they want the human being of the 21st century to be, and they believe they have the power to carry out their plans without asking us. It is transhumanism by force. Speaker 10: We think of the Internet of Bodies as This collection of all these devices as well as all the data that the devices are gathering about you. Speaker 8: Biological knowledge multiplied by computing power, multiplied by data equals the ability to hack humans. The human race is at a pivotal point. To get here, they had to buy the media, Scientific publications, pharmaceutical laboratories, supranational organizations. With money, they have bought the will of politicians, associations, scientists, organizations. They created a test that doesn't diagnose anything to instill panic in the population. Speaker 0: With the swine flu, this was only selling drugs. And they found out that with a pandemic threat, you could do many things. Speaker 8: The flu has been called COVID. The flu cannot suddenly go away. An injection that doesn't immunize Has been called a vaccine. Speaker 7: The 2 dose of the vaccine offer very limited protection, if any. Speaker 8: An injection that in addition to modifying the DNA has other purposes far removed from what we have been told. A technology that, in order for it to work, introduces toxins into the body. Therefore, in the year of the so called vaccine, there are more deaths than in 2020. These elites have declared war on the people, and they try to divide us through lies. Speaker 5: All of these people are responsible for what is looking like is going to be a mass genocide of Australian people and people all across the world. Every single politician that stood up and told you That these were safe and effective lied to you. Speaker 0: Or will it live leave tiny robots to replicate in the crevices of our souls? It is a a trope or would it live the tiny robots to replicate in the crevices of our souls. It is a a trope.
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - May 20, 2023 at 8:55 PM
Saved - May 21, 2023 at 5:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Concerning levels of DNA contamination have been found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters linked to cancer development in humans. The vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination, which can integrate into the genome and drive aggressive gene expression. The SV40 promoter is present in Pfizer vaccines and is known to cause increased expression of genes that can drive cancer. The sequence is unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine and should be removed. Researchers are running assays to determine how much of this DNA is present after vaccination.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan discovered concerning levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters tied to cancer development in humans: "It's in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn't have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA... Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there's a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA... At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up... If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So there's a history of being concerned over SV40. Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn't necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it's still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated." @Kevin_McKernan @RMConservative

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin McKernan, Chief Science Officer and Founder of Medicinal Genomics, discusses his research on DNA plasmids found in Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines. The DNA contamination in the vaccines is concerning due to potential long-term effects and the risk of genome integration. McKernan highlights the lack of quality control and transparency in the manufacturing process. He also raises concerns about the potential for prothrombotic effects and the presence of an oncogenic virus promoter in the DNA. McKernan emphasizes the need for further research and replication of his findings to better understand the extent of DNA contamination in the vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, a couple months ago, I read an article to you about research that was done that actually tried to take a look at these vials and test them for contaminants. And one of them by our next guest, Kevin McKernan, seem to find these DNA plasmids left over as kind of the, you know, because mRNA as the byproduct of of this DNA sequencing. And they found levels in there that are very concerning, that raised concerns about the long term ability to produce more, you know, spike protein factories. And just the fact that there's zero concern to engage in any quality control. But it was highly technical, and obviously I'm not qualified to talk about it. So we have with us the the author of that study Kevin McKernan himself. He's chief science officer and founder of Medicinal Genomics. He has many years of experience in revolutionary sequencing technologies. So again, he's well versed in gene therapy. He's a microbiologist, an expert in gene decoding. He's done important work on studying DNA contamination in these COVID shots. So nobody is more qualified to explain this in in plain language than Kevin himself. So with no further ado, Kevin, it is a true honor to bring you here for the first time to Blaze Media. Speaker 1: Oh, thank you for having me, Daniel. It's an important topic because I think the vast majority of the public is not aware of how slipshod the manufacturing is on these vaccines. Speaker 0: Show So could you explain Obviously, people by now, at least my audience, understands the mRNA and the dangers and all of the safety signals we've seen from them. We we now have 35 100 case studies, running the gamut about 24 different organ systems and health conditions. But you discovered DNA plasmids in Moderna's vials. Could you just take as much time as you need to explain, you know, why you looked at this, what are plasmids, how they get in there, and and why they're concerning. Speaker 1: Certainly. So there is in both Moderna and Pfizer's, and we looked at, the bivalent vaccines and the for both Moderna Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer. We didn't have access to monovalents for Moderna. But, in all 3 cases of Pfizer's monovalent and bivalents and Moderna's bivalents, there is double stranded DNA contamination in in the vaccines. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches, what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA. So in order for these folks to scale up the synthesis of these mRNAs to hit billions of arms, They had to change the manufacturing mid trial. So actually halfway through the trials that were all given these fictitious numbers of 95% efficacy, They changed the method of manufacturing these to from from chemical synthesis of the RNA to manufacturing them inside E. Coli. So they get E. Coli to absorb a DNA plasmid, which expresses many, many copies of the DNA. So they first want lots of copies of DNA that they can then transcribe RNA off of that DNA. Nicole, I agree at doing this. She put a plasmid in there. It makes a couple of copies of the plasmid. They replicate every 20 minutes. So overnight, you can get billions, if not trillions, of of Xerox copies of the template you need to make this RNA from. The challenge is getting rid of that RNA and getting that RNA, Speaker 0: and DNA. Kevin, let's slow it down. You're really smart. I want everyone to understand this, so let's take it each tranche at a time. So before we talk about the problem, you're just saying the rationale for even using DNA, the fact is, where do you get the mRNA strands from that are numerous enough that you could scale up to what was it? I mean, there's several billions Billions Speaker 1: of arms. Yeah. Billions of shots. Speaker 0: Billions of arms. You know, 13,000,000,000 doses or something in that ballpark between all of them. I mean, that that includes AstraZeneca, but we're talking about 1,000,000,000. So you're saying, forget about, you know, science for a minute, it's a manufacturing issue, so that's where the science comes in, and you're saying that e coli plasmids were the best vectors for that? Speaker 1: Yes. Those are the easiest things to grow. If you need to grow grams to kilograms amounts of DNA, it gets done In the E. Coli. Now, there are challenges in growing things in E. Coli is that you have to get your DNA out of the E. Coli, and also get rid of the DNA when you're done making RNA. And those 2 steps are areas that I think are lacking a lot of, Transparency. When when you wanna get DNA out of E. Coli and you crack open the E. Coli to get it, you have now, contaminated your DNA with all types of endotoxin from the actual e coli. Now, pharma should be testing for endotoxin levels, but all the EMA documents and and other FOIA requests people put forward, it's not clear to me how they're testing for that, or what levels they're, they're they're finding. Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. Coli endotoxin Not only on TV, but like in the various database. You can see people get injected with this and this drop. That could be background from this E. Coli manufacturing the DNA. So that's a separate topic in LPSO and endotoxin. I don't wanna go into that just yet, but just getting enough of this DNA to make the RNA is Challenge, and they had to change midstream in their in their trial, to ramp up production. And so the trial is actually somewhat confounded with the fact that some of the participants in the trial were were given 1 manufacturing method, and other ones were given this plasmid based manufacturing, which is, I think is something you'll see more more and more news on in in the coming coming weeks. Speaker 0: So so you tested and you're thinking, wait a minute, who's to say you got out the DNA that you, know, use to to formulate it. It's not a perfect analogy, but I picture, you know, if you wanna make egg salad, there's nothing more disgusting than eating shells in the eggs. So you gotta make sure you get out the shell. And, you know, if you want the eggs, you you have to get the shell out. So it's not exactly a perfect analogy, but you you wanna get that stuff out, so you're, like, wait a minute. Do you guys really do that? So you got a hold of a bunch of vials. You tested it. Can you talk about what you found? Speaker 1: So what we found we we weren't actually looking for this, but what we did end up finding after sequencing these, We were sequencing the RNA to see if they made any errors making the RNA, and lo and behold, a bunch of DNA came through that wasn't supposed to be there. Sequencing that Encoded the the Plasmid vector, that they're using. And now that Plasmid vector contains a lot of other parts. Uh-uh it has a antibiotic resistance gene, which makes the plasmid gives the E coli resistance to antibiotics, so you can grow only the E coli that have the plasmid. And it also has, at least in the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV 40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus, piece from an oncogenic virus. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people even at the FDA have made note in the past whenever injecting double stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful on, on how you manufacture these things and you have excess amounts of this DNA, The concern for genome integration goes up. There's probably been a lot of discussion throughout the last few years about whether or not the mRNA gets turned into DNA And then and then integrates to the genome. Yes. It's it all it all rests on this, like, reverse transcriptase argument. And there's been a couple interesting papers that have shown that the virus can do it From Rudy Genesch's lab at the Whitehead, there's been some work from Marcus Alden out in Sweden on this as well or Switzerland that looks at the actual Pfizer vaccine reverse transcribed in cancer, liver cells, and everyone's written that off saying those are liver cells, doesn't matter. However, you don't need reverse transcriptase if you're injecting DNA. It's already turned into DNA, and so the integration risks go up dramatically if you're injecting Speaker 0: the So a lot of people are confused, just just to kind of slow that down, that, you know, there's a question whether mRNA reverse transcribes into DNA and we have that Swedish paper we talked about. But you're saying a lot of people don't know that the MRNAs derived from DNA expression. And if that is mixed into the shot, well, you're getting the DNA straight, so that in itself would be would be a a a real, you know, that that would be a smoking gun. So do I have this straight that you found that the contamination of the mRNA vaccines with DNA, is up to 35%? Speaker 1: That depends on how you measure it. Now, there's a new There's a new base inside of this vaccine. I'm sure your audience is aware of. They had to modify the mRNA so that it wouldn't break down. It's got n n one methylsituaridines. As a result of that, a lot of the tools we use in genomics are a little bit confused differentiating DNA and RNA. There's a couple platforms out there that use, interclating that come to numbers like that as high as 30%. However, a thing that might be more conservative or perhaps, If you want if you want to do the most conservative approach and give the pharmaceutical companies the benefits of doubt, use something like quantitative PCR that only measures the DNA From the plasmid and nothing else. No E. Coli, nothing else. And, of course, that's what everyone in in the world is kind of familiar with. They've used qPCR for for monitoring this pandemic. If you run this through qPCR, you'll get something that says CT score around 20. Now for those familiar with the pandemic, you were probably getting called Positive for a CT less than 40. There's big controversy over that. It's very late. The difference between 20 and 40 is a million Alright. So they're willing to inject you with a contaminant that's a 1000000 fold higher than what you might get outside of your You coasted burial on your nose for virus. Speaker 0: You were considered, you know, forced to quarantine based on that level of presence of virus, but you're saying you found in the vials a level of of what? E. Coli or or or DNA plasmid? Speaker 1: It's it's plasma It's plasmid that is replicates the coli and, you know, we don't yet know if it's full length plasmid, but we do know it's Plasmid sequence. When we sequence this DNA, we can tell that it's derived from the plasmid, but the, you know, the sequencing process tends to break the DNA up into smaller pieces. So we can't tell you what percent of the DNA is full length and circular, but that doesn't really matter to the FDA. The FDA and the EMA don't have any requirements about the length of DNA. They just want to have it be, if there's 3 30 nanograms per milligram of DNA, then that's above the limit. There's a good article for folks to, read in on this called from Keith Peden from the FDA, p e d e n. He does a lot of work, assessing how much double stranded DNA is actually tolerable in these types of injections. And this is where some of these where they zero in on some of these numbers. In all cases of how we measure this, the vials that we've had access to are above the limits. And even in the EMA's own documentation. Yeah. Above the limits of 330 nanograms per milligram. Now if if you look into the EMA Speaker 0: are confirmed by the EMA? Speaker 1: Well, I shouldn't say they've confirmed our exact findings, but if you actually read what Pfizer gave to the European Medicines Agency, they showed them 10 lots of data on what their numbers were. And they had some lots in there that were satisfactory. They were 1 millig 1 nanogram per milligram. They had other lots that were 815 Nanograms per milligram. So it varied by 8 15 fold just in the 10 lots that they gave to EMA. And 815 is obviously well over 3 30. Alright. So even in the data that that Pfizer could cherry pick and hand to the FDA, they could not get these numbers under control. And I think that's what, should worry everybody is that we've only surveyed a few lots. If you went and surveyed 10 lots, You would probably find a 10 fold variance. Maybe you need an 800 fold variance in these numbers, because that's at least the variance that we can see inside the documentation of given Regulatory agencies. Speaker 0: So so based on what you're saying, it's not just an issue of, likely, the the DNA plasmids. It's that there's no quality control, so there could be a huge variance in a lot of different, components of the shot. Do you think this is one of the reasons behind the big confounding question as to, you know, there's so many things that are dangerous about this. And indeed, we see with theirs and v safe and all the studies, it affects every organ system, and people are crushed for life. People are dead from it. But then, you know, there are people that 5 of these things that, at least as of now, they they they appear to be okay. Is that does that have to do with the variance of the vials? Speaker 1: I suspect so. There's there's very little quality control, very little transparency. And some people are probably getting blanks. And some people are probably getting Vaccines that have a tremendous amount of contaminant in them. And, tracking that's gonna Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 1: Oh, I think the Process of of making these things, they they have to blend up these these lipid nanoparticles with DNA. And that process isn't if it's not completely homogeneous, you can get some shots Effectively have very little nucleic acid and other ones that have very high concentration of them. I shouldn't say blanks, but just low. You know, very, you know, very low, in which case they're, they're not really getting exposed to expression of toxic spike protein. And, and, you know, there's It's it's it's it's an open question as to how much of this you actually need to to stimulate immune response. Whenever you have a vaccine engine that is in fact, Pathogenic, you arguably want as little of that as possible. In the way in which they settled on 30 microgram doses was somewhat done warp speed. It's quite possible that they are over exposing. If you will notice over time, they are lowering the dose constantly throughout time. I think they recognize they have been injecting people too much of this stuff. So the bivalents, coming out less. When they go to lower age categories, they're using less. When you look at vaccines that they're talking about in the future, they keep talking about using smaller and smaller quantities of these RNAs. I I think they know there's an issue. They're they're just, you know, they're just adjusting these, as they as they move through time. Speaker 0: Well, we're the new lab rats, I guess. You you you you approve it and distribute it first and then study it later. So I want to get to a punchline for people, you know, what this means, this concern that you're finding, what universally should be regarded as as, alarming levels of DNA plasmids. So in terms of the realm of potential concerns, so antibiotic resistance, anaphylaxis, shock, what else? Speaker 1: Well, there are papers out there Suggesting, and demonstrating that double stranded DNA injections can be prothrombotic. So your immune system can go on fire and create some clots, And of course, that's all over the various database of from Speaker 0: those data. From the spike protein? Speaker 1: Divorce yes. Spite protein is one problem. Having double stranded DNA in there will further exacerbate that. If that double stranded DNA for any reason is a canary For in the coal mine of of this endotoxin being present as well. The spike protein has a bunch of features in it that Actually, tend to to, agglutinate, these endotoxins and collect them and and exacerbate clotting reactions. Okay? So the combination of all 3 of these things, there's any potential endotoxin, which again, we don't have data for, but we're very suspect it could be there because when you see plasma DNA showing up, Its nearest neighbor is always endotoxin. But we know there's DNA in there, and we know the spike protein can get expressed and create these clots. So we've got We've got at least 2 things and maybe 3 things that could be driving thrombosis that are in these shots. Now, I I I wanna make it clear that Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Go. Go. I just want to be clear that if they switch this antigen to something that's not as nasty as spike, we're still not in the Alright. There is some talk of them moving to nucleocapsid and a few other areas of this virus to make some type of coronary shot. I don't think that's gonna clear us of the risks of the lip of of the LPS, or of using these lipid nanoparticles, this double stranded DNA connection. Those those issues seem to be part and parcel with this particular platform that they've not yet addressed. There's probably ways to clean them up, but there doesn't seem like they're motivated Do it. Speaker 0: No. Why should they be? No one's There's no liability. So, you know, this is you're giving the scientific rationale for why, you know, you need to have liability like you have in every other product, so the market forces force them to, make a safer product. Obviously, they have no desire to do that. And what's also important, we've we talked a lot about the RSV shots and Moderna's is going to be an mRNA version. So you're gonna have those potential problems even if they don't utilize the spike. I mean, I know doctor McCullough said the proteins he thinks they're utilizing might even be more problematic. But again, putting that aside, you have this issue of how do you derive the the the RNA, and you're saying this double stranded DNA contaminants are a problem, and then again, it could be a drive aggressive gene expression. We don't know the ramifications of that, but, you know, it's not our job to prove a 100% it's doing it. It's their job to rule it out before you put it in those bodies. Yes. Yeah. So I think that Speaker 1: and it it's something that's addressable. There are technologies out there that can erase this DNA. I think they've just Wandered into new territory here because they have these modified nucleotides. Some of the enzymes they use to erase this DNA aren't functioning Early because that other strand is present. It's very these N one methylsituentines are very, very sticky basis, and they tend to stick to the DNA. You end up with these DNA, RNA hybrids that the enzymes don't recognize, and they don't end up erasing the DNA like they should. This is probably something they can address different nucleases, but were never forced to address. It will remain in the future shots unless they get really brought to bear that they have to get rid of the stuff. It is a genome integration risk. That is from the FDA, not from my mouth. Alright. So they are concerned about having high levels of DNA in vaccines because they can integrate. And to the extent that there is an SV 40 promoter in that DNA and that starts integrating into your genome, you're pretty much just Like bombing your genome with promoters that can potentially turn on the gene expression. It it it can look like cancer. It can look like cancer, and that you can end up getting an s c 40 promoter in front of an oncogene, and you will end up with high expression of, a gene that can drive cancer. It will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to to be hit with something like this in order for it to take off. So, cancer risks and genome integration with SC 40. SC 40 actually plagues, granted, it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine was one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. There's a history of being concerned over two forty, and having the promoter inside some of these vectors doesn't seem to be necessary. It seems to be a superfluous oversight they could have eliminated. Yet, it's still there Because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So that piece of DNA is really something I think we really pay attention To, we've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So there are several researchers around the globe that are now running these assays to look for How much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated? You've seen a lot of studies of people picking up this this RNA 28 days or 60 days later, But oftentimes those methods don't discern RNA from DNA. They detect both. And so it could have been that this is the DNA that's actually sticking around, and they're seeing DNA in the breast Milk and DNA in the plasma, many weeks later. So we have to get our handle on how much of this is DNA versus RNA in all the people that have, you know, long vax or long COVID. And some of these tools, I think, will help with the part part. Speaker 0: Trial the pretrial phase after, 5,000,000,000 people got this. Speaker 1: Yes. We've got the order flipped. Right. We're figuring out the buyer distribution after we gave it to everybody. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and and only thanks to you, I mean, there there seems to be no interest. I mean, I'm sure they've done tests on it, but they won't disclose them. It's interesting, there's an article in New Scientist recently, Cancer Mystery. Cancer Mystery as cases rise among younger people around the world. Yeah. I mean, it's it's It's pretty, Speaker 1: a real head scratcher. Speaker 0: Yeah, real head scratcher, just like, the WHO declared a problem with myocarditis in in the UK, of course, they blame blamed on enter virus, but, you know, it's it's a lot of these coincidences taking place. I wanted to I I gotta ask you this, in my off base here, is this a big problem? If you have a lot of DNA floating around. Is there a concern? So a lot of people have been wondering why it seems like in many parts of the world, the excess desk got even worse in 2022 and, like, for example, was it Taiwan? I forgot which country I just looked at. You know, it it had its worst excess deaths just a couple months ago when the take up of the vaccine has gone down to nil, and it's been that way for quite some time. So there's this question about, okay, what does this thing do to you long term? Is there a concern that the DNA can create a Trojan horse spike factory over time that could produce more mRNA that will, you know, tell your body to produce more spike. God, I don't know, a year or 2 years, 3 years after you got the shot? Speaker 1: That's that is certainly true. It is a possibility. So far, the few vials that we've looked at, the DNA has been fairly fragmented and and small at length. So I don't think you get full spike expression from what we have seen. However, as I've mentioned before, we only scanned a few of these files, and from what we've looked up in I think there's a website that looks at how bad is my shot. We're not necessarily working with the most notorious lots. So it's possible that some of the other lots have have more intact DNA. Speaker 0: I think you get a hold of it. Speaker 1: Could have well, we we've only been able to get things that are expired. Think I think there's probably some ethical concerns with people, and we're not going we don't wanna encourage anyone to ship us stuff that's stolen. But, you know, the stuff that goes in the trash, people can but if you know, you're starting to do some people's fine. Speaker 0: Like you could call up the FDA and say, hey, you know, I'd like to test a 100 vials from this lot. Speaker 1: I'd I would be very suspect if they even pick up the phone. They seem to be completely told that to everything else going on on this topic. So, yeah. You know, they're they're not gonna help out. Like But Speaker 0: a lot of people and and this has been the problem for 3 years. People like you will come along and pioneer a study that is very concerning on some aspect of this. Now, it doesn't conclusively prove, you know, all of the implications of it, but it certainly shows that this is something that you really need to jump on, and they'll be like, well, you didn't show this or this. Well, yeah, we don't have access to it, but you do, so you have an obligation to take it to the next level. And of course, they don't, at least not publicly, and don't disclose it. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Do you believe it's a concern that, again, moving away from the plasmid DNA stuff, just in terms of just general variance. I mean, we're we're talking a lot about the RSV shots and the new flu shots they wanna do and and Nipah, Zika. And we could talk about a 1000000 different prima facie problems with the pursuit of those vaccines and the way they're doing it. But based on what you're telling me, why shouldn't this be a problem with an array of ingredients that they put in the RSV shot? Speaker 1: Anything that has a that has a liability waiver, you should always question the quality control because what that is giving them is a hall pass in doing any of it. And, and there's going to be no one responsible for monitoring it once it goes up the door. Once the FDA Gets on board with something, there's some psychological, I think block for them to reverse and then look how long it took them to reverse Vioxx, it was 5 years Right. And the market knew there was a problem long before the FDA finally got their ass and did something about it. So, the same is gonna be true with any vaccine that comes has a liability waiver. Diox didn't have a liability waiver and it was still wrong. Alright. So, I think the whole, you know, the population should be Pay close attention to that. And and to your point about, the burden of proof and where it falls, well, you know, the the the number one critique front of the work is it's not through peer review. I'd be surprised if it gets through peer review, not because of the quality of the work, but because the journals just don't accept this type of stuff. Most of the journals have pharmaceutical funding. So the best thing you can do in an environment like that is produce assays and methods that people can reproduce, Very cheaply and quickly because science isn't about peer review, it's about reproduction. If other people can reproduce your work in another country, then science moves forward. Peer review, most people don't realize, no one picks up a pipette in peer review. They just sit around a table and opine whether they believe your work or not. But rubber meets the road with reproduction. So what we've done, what we've been very careful to do is to publish all of our methods, put them transparently on the web, so anyone can copy these PCR primers and replicate the work In a matter of weeks. We've got now a couple labs around the world that are starting to do that. So we've seen some evidence from a group in Europe that has to reproduce the sequencing of the monovalent vaccines, they shared the sequence with us, they're in the process of publishing it, and they saw the same thing. The FC 40 promoters are in there, and there's in fact DNA present. There is a group in Japan that's doing some of this as well. They've also seen very low CT scores suggesting high amounts of DNA So, it's beginning to occur in a much more decentralized manner, and I think that's what people should keep their eye Can people reproduce this, ignore whether the journals, whether they bless this or not, because even if it gets through peer review, there'll be a mob that will pack it and try and get it retracted. And that's that's not that's not the scientific method. Scientific method is all about reproduction. Yeah. Speaker 0: No. And and that's I'm glad you mentioned that because it's not just about the liability waiver. It's that the most powerful governments of the universe, beginning with our own government, they have embedded in all aspects of society, medicine, and academia. The funding, the censorship, the boot of the government to monopolize the the the marketplace and the public square to ensure that there is no quality control. Meaning meaning, even without the formal, liability waiver, you add it to all of that, you know, what other product is funded and promoted and distributed by government this much, and then a separate pot of money funding and promoting everything down from the, you know, associate whatever. You know, pediatric, whatevers, and the college of OB GYNs, and up and down the totem pole. There is literally no ability to to stop this. Speaker 1: I mean it's very centralized. We need to decentralize the NIH. I mean look at what they did with the whole pandemic origin story, right. They changed the narrative there because they had some central control and were able to you know promote this zoonosis fraud. And then, you can even look at the there's the Zhang papers, the one that demonstrated nuclear localization of this thing and potentially It's impacting P53 and BRCA1, had a cancer risk, right? There is someone in the government, getting his last name, it's Eric. I have to point your listeners to a to a link afterwards. But but basically, some employees at the NIH went and attacked this paper and got it retracted, And then people foiled their emails and they had 4 50 emails with this author's name in it, 4 50 pages of emails, and they were all redacted. Alright. So there's a whole story on the Jiang paper on how they went out and killed a paper that was for for illegitimate reasons. I've read the paper and that the the reasons for retraction one of the authors disagrees with the retraction as he should. And it was basically an inside government hit job on a paper to get it torn down. You know, the truth isn't going to come out through their channels. It's going to come out through channels like yours and alternative Speaker 0: Based on what you're saying, I don't know if you saw this yesterday, it's all the more Gary the fact that despite all the censorship, doctor Paul Offit, who's perhaps the most notorious, child vaccinologist, he and 3 others on Verbeck voted against the Pfizer Harness v shot. That's a pretty big deal and that that's gotta be really bad fur, because they they rarely have dissent. And that that really does scare me. Speaker 1: Been changes too, which is which is, people should pay very close attention to that. Been obviously very pro vaxx his entire career. He's the benefactor of the entire system. And even he is seeing that this has gone way too far. Yep. And that If you say publicly, Speaker 0: you better believe privately there's a lot more where that came from. If this is what he's willing to say publicly, because I mean, this thing is I mean, you know, I'm not a scientist. I'm not a doctor. I'm a political guy. I know politics. And I say controversial things, get involved in things. I have never seen more of a viciousness, then I mean, I mean, you could you could, like, wave a confederate flag and and you won't be attacked as much as as for, questioning vaccines. I mean, this is the holy grail. And this is just really scary, even if they shut off all the shots, but the fact that they're doubling down on warp speed and they're ready out for the next. Your research is very important. Exit question. What could people expect from you in the coming months and where could they find your work? Speaker 1: Well, our work is, you'll find most of my work either on Twitter or Substack. The Substack is, is an end in mind is my handle there, and the substack is the Pedalactone newsletter. The Pedalactone, I know it's a long word, but it's catnip. It's the actual, it's the active ingredient in catnip, so that's the way to find it. So all of the methods that we that we published are up there. I work at medicinal genomics, which has nothing to do with with with QC vaccines. This was a bit of an accident that we ran into this and felt like we had to put it public. But nonetheless, our efforts are focused on bringing sequencing and genomics into medicinal plants and fungi markets because we believe the way to basically defang this pharma cartel is to actually get natural medicines that you can grow in your backyard to be better qualified, I understood and sequenced. So, we produce a lot of safety monitoring tools in the cannabis in philosophy space, And those are those are markets that you're seeing some medical legalization decentralized out of the FDA and into dispensaries. And we think that's a safer and a more appropriate model for medicines that we know have extraordinarily, favorable safety profiles. Putting them through to the FDA is only going to make them more Probably, you know, chronified it into a few a few people who can sell them. So our that's that's our expertise. I don't know what's gonna happen next on this. We're involved in lawsuits right now about this topic. Right now, there's not much more that we can do other than survey more vials. But right now, we are trying to Send out reagents to anyone who wants to replicate this, so that we can get a better survey of what other what the vial to vial variance is in the field. Because right now we have such a narrow view on this. It's just a few vials and of course the major critique people have about the vials that we have Surveyed are that, we don't have provenance over them and they're expired. Right? So what does this look like in in vials that you can get directly From CVS or directly from, from pharma that are within their expiration range. That's still an unknown. For those who have critiqued the work About these being expired vials. I will remind everyone that they were sealed vials, so they were not tampered with and, the vector that We found the sequence that we found that matches Pfizer's disclosure to the EMA. So, we they did not get they did not disclose the sequence DNA, they gave them a little pretty picture of a map of their plasmid that they covered up the SG 40 region, they hid that from the EMA. We managed to sequence everything, find all of their details, but also find the SP 40 region. So I don't think any, you know, gremlin could have put that into these vials and, and And produce these results. These things, it seems to be legitimate that these are within the vials. The only question is, what is the concentration of the DNA versus the RNA, and how does that vary lot to lot? And we're going to learn that in time. So I'd say, just stay tuned. There's a lot of people replicating this work in various jurisdictions around the world on different lots. And we should have more data in the next 6 months to get people more insight on how much it varies. Speaker 0: Well, we'll definitely be be following you on Twitter and following your work. Thanks so much for the briefing today, and looking forward to having you back. Wow, folks. That was something else. You might wanna go back and listen on half the speed. Threw in a lot there, talked quickly, I apologize, the audio wasn't the greatest, but you know, the point is not to get all the scientific nuances. You're smart enough to realize that this jives with everything we've seen for 3 years. There's no quality control, there's no desire for it. Everything that our type of researchers discover and they say is wrong turns out to be true. And the symptomology that we're seeing from the world jives with everything he's saying. And again, they're doing this as they're approving other vaccines at warp speed non stop, and there is no backstop to this. And that that leads me to the end of the show. You know, you look you look at the last couple weeks.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose "The assembly of Pfizer vial 1 contains a 72bp insertion not present in the assembly of Pfizer vial 2. This indel is known for its enhancement to the SV40 promoter and its nuclear localization signal (Dean et al. 1999) (Moreau et al. 1981)." Kevin McKernan, Yvonne Helbert, Liam T. Kane, Stephen McLaughlin Medicinal Genomics @Kevin_McKernan https://osf.io/b9t7m/

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Japanese Professor Murakami of Tokyo University expresses concerns over the alarming discovery of Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters, associated with human cancer development, in Pfizer vials: "The Pfizer vaccine has a staggering problem. I have made an amazing finding. This figure is an enlarged view of Pfizer's vaccine sequence. As you can see, the Pfizer vaccine sequence contains part of the SV40 sequence here. This sequence is known as a promoter. Roughly speaking, the promoter causes increased expression of the gene. The problem is that the sequence is present in a well-known carcinogenic virus. The question is why such a sequence that is derived from a cancer virus is present in Pfizer's vaccine. There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine. This is not the only problem. If a sequence like this is present in the DNA, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus. So it means that the DNA can easily enter the genome. This is such an alarming problem. It is essential to remove the sequence. However, Pfizer produced the vaccine without removing the sequence. That is outrageously malicious. This kind of promoter sequence is completely unnecessary for the production of the mRNA vaccine. In fact, SV40 is a promoter of cancer viruses." @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I read the sequence and it's high-resolution. Speaker 1: It may seem low at first, but it's understandable. Speaker 0: This is written in a loop. Speaker 1: This is the genetic sequence of the spike protein. The issue is that the model RNA has a sequence that surprised me. We need to design it a bit. It contains part of the sequence SB4T, which is necessary for gene expression. The problem is that it is found in a virus that has negative effects. Also, there is another problem with this sequence. The DNA that has been transferred so far becomes more susceptible to mutation. It's a problematic point. Speaker 1: So, this SB4T sequence is also included in the promoter of this SB method, which allows it to migrate to the nucleus. Speaker 0: This is quite famous. Speaker 1: Yes, it is. The issue is that it has no relation to the process of synthesizing the messenger RNA. Speaker 0: Why did they keep the promoter sequence in the SB4T that has nothing to do with the camera's perspective in the messenger RNA synthesis process?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 配列 が えっ 読め るわけ で し ハイ レ ゾ に 読んで みた の は これが モデル ナ の方 の ハイ ですね Speaker 1: まあ 一旦 じゃあ の 低い かもしれないけど わ っ か なんですね パー ス ん とき Speaker 0: えー っ これ Speaker 1: 輪っか に 書いて あって Speaker 0: ブー ブー ここは スパイ ク の 遺伝子 なんですね で ですね 問題は モデル ナ の方が よく 大 腸 菌 で くれ 利用 する よ を ラ ベ クター で 配列 なんですが スパイ ザー の この 配列 で 服 見て びっくり した んですけども で 効果 ちょっと の 設計 しますね ここに ですね s b 4 t の 配列 の一部 が入って まして で 恒 例 は フル モーター って言う んですけども 遺伝子 発 現 を ですね 上昇 させる っていうか 遺伝子 発 現 を させる の に必要な 配列 なんですよ で 問題は 有名な その せい を持って るような ウイルス で その 排出 が入っている ということ がありまして どうして こういう ガン ボ リュー ス でいい かって 扉 絵 するような ハイ ですが ブー ブー それが 8 しか 入ってる っていうの と あと ですね もう一つ の問題 はこの 配列 が入っています と ですね その d na が 今まで 移行 し あ つ な っ その d na は a と 移行 し やすくなる と あり やすくなる んですね の も に っ パ プリ フ っていう の問題 点 まあ ある Speaker 1: わけで その この s b 法 廷 の プロ モーター の中に 核 に 移行 するような 配列 も 入ってる ってこと です Speaker 0: で これ 結構 有名な Speaker 1: ござい まし Speaker 0: そう なんですよ やっぱり 問題 なのは ね メ ッ セン ジャー の 王 道 視点 カメラ で 合成 するような プロセス に 全く 関係ない su v 4 t に プロ モーター 配列 を なぜ 残 した んです

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Full Podcast: The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials with @RMConservative and @Kevin_McKernan https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-man-who-found-dna-toxins-in-pfizer-moderna-vials/id1065050908?i=1000613696167

‎Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz: The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials | Guest: Kevin McKernan | 5/19/23 on Apple Podcasts It’s not just the spike protein and the mRNA that are a problem. Microbiologist Kevin McKernan pioneered research on testing some of the COVID vaccine vials and discovered unacceptable levels of double-stranded DNA plasmids floating around. He joins us today to warn that there is no quality control… podcasts.apple.com
RenzTom
Posted - August 19, 2023 at 1:15 PM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 10:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a conversation, @RenzTom claims that COVID-19 vaccines are not mRNA but modRNA, a lab-created hybrid that could potentially cause permanent genetic changes. They argue that this is a fraudulent attack on humanity without informed consent. @prayinghawk144 mentions the body count in VAERS and calls for accountability.

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

BREAKING: The #FDA #CDC #Pfizer & the rest misled the world. They claimed the COVID-19 vaccines were mRNA & that meant MESSENGER RNA (which occurs in life everywhere). It is NOT. The #mRNA is modRNA. #modRNA is a lab created hybrid designed to create changes in your genes. It lasts longer & could potentially create PERMANENT changes to you. It also has the potential to have massive unintended consequences in the other 3300 billion lines of code that make up humanity. This is how it can survive in the food supply (along with the adjuvants) & I lay all this out in my substack (see the thread below) and it is THEIR words not mine. This is one of the greatest FRAUDS & attacks on humanity in the history of the world. This is a bunch of people that think they are God trying to alter genetics without #InformedConsent. What else have they lied to us about? EVERYONE MUST HEAR THIS! PLEASE SHARE. #WEF #CCP #Biden @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @stkirsch @RobertKennedyJr @EmeraldRobinson @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @charliekirk11 @naomirwolf @BusyDrT @NeputeWellness @DrHenryEaly @TheClayClark @MelKShow @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @dbongino @realMeetJames @monicaonairtalk @Covid19Critical @MdBreathe @DrJBhattacharya @gatewaypundit @ChildrensHD @DrSyedHaider @americahappens1 @ihcmissouri @OhioAMF

@prayinghawk144 - Prayinghawk144

@RenzTom Bodycount in VAERS as of 8/11 for these criminals. @SecBecerra must be brought in to answer for the chaos under his watch! FEMA, CDC, FDA. Enough is enough. @jathorpmfm @P_McCulloughMD @AlbertHarshaw @RepLaMalfa @TKimmelshue @J_GallagherAD3 @BrianDahleCA

RenzTom
Posted - August 19, 2023 at 1:15 PM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 8:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses the claim that COVID-19 vaccines contain modified RNA (modRNA) instead of messenger RNA (mRNA), which could potentially have permanent effects on genes. @RenzTom accuses the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, and others of misleading the public. @TLAVagabond acknowledges their previous discussions on the dangers of modRNA and expresses appreciation for raising awareness. @RenzTom explains their research on mRNA's stability in food and its connection to genetic manipulation. They credit others for contributing to their knowledge on the topic.

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

BREAKING: The #FDA #CDC #Pfizer & the rest misled the world. They claimed the COVID-19 vaccines were mRNA & that meant MESSENGER RNA (which occurs in life everywhere). It is NOT. The #mRNA is modRNA. #modRNA is a lab created hybrid designed to create changes in your genes. It lasts longer & could potentially create PERMANENT changes to you. It also has the potential to have massive unintended consequences in the other 3300 billion lines of code that make up humanity. This is how it can survive in the food supply (along with the adjuvants) & I lay all this out in my substack (see the thread below) and it is THEIR words not mine. This is one of the greatest FRAUDS & attacks on humanity in the history of the world. This is a bunch of people that think they are God trying to alter genetics without #InformedConsent. What else have they lied to us about? EVERYONE MUST HEAR THIS! PLEASE SHARE. #WEF #CCP #Biden @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @stkirsch @RobertKennedyJr @EmeraldRobinson @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @charliekirk11 @naomirwolf @BusyDrT @NeputeWellness @DrHenryEaly @TheClayClark @MelKShow @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @dbongino @realMeetJames @monicaonairtalk @Covid19Critical @MdBreathe @DrJBhattacharya @gatewaypundit @ChildrensHD @DrSyedHaider @americahappens1 @ihcmissouri @OhioAMF

@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond

@RenzTom Would have appreciated a shout brother, since we pointed you in this direction and TLAV has been on this topic before most were even aware these things were dangerous. Glad you getting this important topic some reach. #ModRNA https://t.co/UEMAbhhX2E

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

@TLAVagabond @wildweatherdan @USWeatherExpert @JDRucker Nice on that @TLAVagabond . Lab created synthetic mRNA is most certainly NOT in every living creature. I’ve used my card… this guy might want to use his. #mRNA does not equal #modRNA

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

Love for you on this @TLAVagabond. Honestly I’ve been researching down this path for a very long time & the origin of the research was based on the question how was mRNA going to work in food since messenger RNA in its normal form is so fragile. This led to a ton of research on the evolution of vax tech and its ties to genetic manipulation (gene therapy). A lot of people have put out good things that have contributed to me feeling comfortable I could argue this and clearly you were on it as well. I’d forgotten about you being amongst those that contributed to my research/knowledge on this but won’t hesitate to say that you and many others may have knew this before me and I’m grateful you all kept pushing.

RenzTom
Posted - August 19, 2023 at 1:15 PM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 11:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses the claim that COVID-19 vaccines contain modified mRNA that can potentially cause permanent changes to genes. @TinfoilTricorn provides articles supporting the idea of reverse transcription and integration of viral RNA into the human genome. @RenzTom appreciates the information but acknowledges the need for further evidence. It is important to critically evaluate the content and consult experts for a comprehensive understanding.

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

BREAKING: The #FDA #CDC #Pfizer & the rest misled the world. They claimed the COVID-19 vaccines were mRNA & that meant MESSENGER RNA (which occurs in life everywhere). It is NOT. The #mRNA is modRNA. #modRNA is a lab created hybrid designed to create changes in your genes. It lasts longer & could potentially create PERMANENT changes to you. It also has the potential to have massive unintended consequences in the other 3300 billion lines of code that make up humanity. This is how it can survive in the food supply (along with the adjuvants) & I lay all this out in my substack (see the thread below) and it is THEIR words not mine. This is one of the greatest FRAUDS & attacks on humanity in the history of the world. This is a bunch of people that think they are God trying to alter genetics without #InformedConsent. What else have they lied to us about? EVERYONE MUST HEAR THIS! PLEASE SHARE. #WEF #CCP #Biden @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @stkirsch @RobertKennedyJr @EmeraldRobinson @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @charliekirk11 @naomirwolf @BusyDrT @NeputeWellness @DrHenryEaly @TheClayClark @MelKShow @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @dbongino @realMeetJames @monicaonairtalk @Covid19Critical @MdBreathe @DrJBhattacharya @gatewaypundit @ChildrensHD @DrSyedHaider @americahappens1 @ihcmissouri @OhioAMF

@TinfoilTricorn - The Tinfôil Tricõrn 🇺🇸

You should be specific that the mrna is instructions for RNA that can and does enter the nucleus under conditions of cellular mitosis which is the process of cell growth and replacement. Once such process is Line 1 reverse transcription in which all instructions found in the cell are replicated into the nucleus. This is known many involved with this plot will lie about nucleus entry leading to cell death.

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

I appreciate the comment @TinfoilTricorn . As a lawyer I only take the arguments as far as I need to demonstrate the “crime”. Since I don’t have the credentials of the scientists that are lying about this have I have to base everything I say on something I can show. In this case I can show in great detail what I alleged but have not gotten far enough down this road to back up what you are saying. Please don’t think I’m disagreeing, I’m not, I just don’t have the evidence lined up to back up what you said. I have no train to doubt you but I always make sure I’ve got the evidence myself before I say something or tell people I don’t. In this case I had the evidence for what I was saying so I wanted it out there unambiguously.

@TinfoilTricorn - The Tinfôil Tricõrn 🇺🇸

I had to fight the AI to get this, I hope it helps I recommend printing the articles and research papers at least to PDF as they are likely to dissappear. Here are some relevant articles and studies related to your query: 1. [New research supports finding explaining why some patients may ...](https://wi.mit.edu/news/new-research-supports-finding-explaining-why-some-patients-may-test-positive-covid-19-long) (MIT) - Date: Feb 28, 2023 - Summary: The researchers found that parts of the viral genome were reverse transcribed into the human genome, meaning the viral RNA was integrated. 2. [Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: A hypothesis](https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9876036/) - Date: Jan 25, 2023 - Summary: Reverse transcription occurred in as little as six hours post vaccine exposure, and the reverse-transcribed BNT162b2 cDNA was found to enter the nucleus. 3. [Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 ...](https://mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73) - Date: Feb 25, 2022 - Summary: The study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. 4. [Eminent MIT Scientists Defend Controversial SARS-CoV-2 Genome ...](https://genengnews.com/insights/eminent-mit-scientists-defend-controversial-sars-cov-2-genome-integration-results/) - Date: May 13, 2021 - Summary: In a much-debated study, MIT investigators demonstrate non-infectious pieces of the virus' RNA genome can be reverse transcribed into DNA. 5. [Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into ... - PNAS](https://pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2105968118) - Summary: These results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be integrated into the genomes of cultured human cells by a LINE1-mediated retroposition mechanism. Please note that while these articles and studies provide information on the topic, it's essential to critically evaluate the content and consult with experts in the field for a comprehensive understanding.

DjaonBea
Posted - August 20, 2023 at 8:10 AM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 8:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Injections contain modRNA, a lab-created hybrid to modify genes. Potential permanent changes. Massive unforeseen consequences in human code. Survives in food supply with adjuvants. Substack reveals their words, not mine. One of the biggest frauds and attacks on humanity. Group playing God without consent. What else have they lied about? Translation and adaptation. Must-see link: https://resee.it/tweet/1692888126836842709. Learn more at https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/mrna-and-why-it-matters. Save thread at reSeeIt.

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

⚠️ Les injections ne contiennent pas comme annoncées de l'ARNm mais du #modRNA ⚠️ qui est un hybride créé en laboratoire pour modifier les gènes. Changements potentiellement PERMANENTS. #COVID19

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

Il a également le potentiel d'avoir des conséquences imprévues massives dans les 3300 milliards de lignes de code qui composent l'être humain. C'est ainsi qu'il peut survivre dans l'approvisionnement alimentaire (avec les adjuvants).

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

et je mets tout cela dans Substack (voir le fil ci-dessous) et ce sont LEURS mots pas les miens. ⚠️C'est l'une des plus grandes fraudes et attaques contre l'humanité de l'histoire du monde.⚠️

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

C'est un groupe de gens qui pensent qu'ils sont Dieu essayant de modifier la génétique sans #InformedConsent . Sur quoi d'autre il nous ont mentis ? (c'est une traduction et adaptation) #MustSee https://resee.it/tweet/1692888126836842709

reSee.it #6338 - @RenzTom PDF, screenshot, and permanently saved Tweet Thread from @RenzTom resee.it

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/mrna-and-why-it-matters

MRNA & Why It Matters This article is pretty science heavy so at this point I also want to acknowledge two additional points. First, I am not a Peter McCullough/Harvey Risch type scientist. I am a lawyer with some science background. That means that I am not the guy that will be creating science, but to do my job as an attorney litigating in this area I have to be able to read and understand the science. I do those things quite well. Second, the information in this article is based simply on reading and understanding the science. There is nothing here I’ve created - I just know how to read. tomrenz.substack.com

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@reSeeIt save thread

DjaonBea
Posted - August 20, 2023 at 9:26 AM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 10:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Injections19 contain modRNA, not mRNA. ModRNA is used in gene therapies to modify DNA. It can also be added to food. Important details: modRNA, mRNA, ARNm, COVID19, CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. Notable individuals: andrebercoff, YvesPDB, SinedWarrior, DubreuilhMarcel, alainhoupert, BOROWSKIMIKE. Save thread.

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

⚠️🦠☣️HYPER IMPORTANT☣️🦠⚠️ Les injections-19 ne contiennent pas du mRNA mais du modRNA. Le modRNA est utilisé dans les thérapies géniques (pour modifier l'ADN). Ils peuvent en mettre dans la nourriture... Je dois vous faire un dessin ?

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

https://x.com/djaonbea/status/1693173590940668188?s=46&t=Jctk1GuBulYHWPJTaahNmA

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

#modRNA #mRNA #ARNm #COVID19 #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG @andrebercoff @YvesPDB @SinedWarrior @DubreuilhMarcel @alainhoupert @BOROWSKIMIKE

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@andrebercoff @YvesPDB @SinedWarrior @DubreuilhMarcel @alainhoupert @BOROWSKIMIKE @reSeeIt save thread

DjaonBea
Posted - August 20, 2023 at 9:53 AM
Saved - August 20, 2023 at 10:20 AM

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

J'ai compris !!! Moderna viens de modRNA #modRNA #mRNA #COVID19 #CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

⚠️🦠☣️HYPER IMPORTANT☣️🦠⚠️ Les injections-19 ne contiennent pas du mRNA mais du modRNA. Le modRNA est utilisé dans les thérapies géniques (pour modifier l'ADN). Ils peuvent en mettre dans la nourriture... Je dois vous faire un dessin ? https://t.co/39ikp8WXL5

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

BREAKING: The #FDA #CDC #Pfizer & the rest misled the world. They claimed the COVID-19 vaccines were mRNA & that meant MESSENGER RNA (which occurs in life everywhere). It is NOT. The #mRNA is modRNA. #modRNA is a lab created hybrid designed to create changes in your genes. It…

RenzTom
Posted - August 23, 2023 at 12:09 PM
Saved - August 23, 2023 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: Liberty Daily reports a shocking coincidence. Organic food can allegedly be injected with poison, including gene therapy mRNA, modRNA, and other RNA technologies, as long as they are labeled as vaccines. Missouri GOP introduced HB1169 for Informed Consent, but other states and Congress need to act. Watch the video for more on poison in organic food. #VaccineGenocide

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

BREAKING COINCIDENCE: This morning the headline on Liberty Daily was about me breaking that ORGANIC FOOD can be injected with poison #GeneTherapy mRNA, modRNA, & other RNA tech as long as they say these are vaccines. Now the cite is down (pic below) - I wonder why? BTW - here is the law I mentioned… anything to say #Missouri #GOP? No need for #HB1169 to ensure #InformedConsent before being exposed to gene therapies like #mRNA #modRNA & #saRNA (which CAN survive digestion)? Any other states have the courage to pass this bill right? How about the Ag Bill in Congress now? @Jim_Jordan @RandPaul @RepThomasMassie & @SpeakerMcCarthy will you fix this federally? Video in the thread. #vaccines #DiedSuddenly #WEF #VaccineGenocide #CCP @GenFlynn @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @stkirsch @joerogan @TuckerCarlson @dbongino @EpochTimes @gatewaypundit @InfoWars_tv @ihcmissouri @P_McCulloughMD @RobertKennedyJr @EmeraldRobinson @deanplocher @Brookemillermd @RWMaloneMD @NeputeWellness @BusyDrT @PatrickByrne @RenzWarriors @MelKShow @OhioAMF @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @DrHenryEaly @drcole12 @catsscareme2021 @liz_churchill10 @WarClandestine @catturd2 @MoCattle @JDRucker

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

Here’s some video about these poison COVID type modRNA and mRNA vaccines in ORGANIC food: #modRNA #mRNA

c_plushie
Posted - September 19, 2023 at 2:34 AM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 3:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer shot may contain DNA contaminants that can permanently alter your genetic code and SV40 sequences that can infect your gut, causing cancer. Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testified about these concerns. Watch their full testimonies. Researchers are alarmed by the DNA contamination in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

🧵 THREAD DNA & SV40 In The #Pfizer Shot Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer. This video has excerpts from the testimonies of Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Please watch their full testimonies which I've posted in the thread below. @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @nzdsos @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @mattletiss7 @NickHudsonCT 🔊

Video Transcript AI Summary
A biochemist and toxicologist discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. They claim that the vaccine contains plasma DNA, including SV40 sequences, which were not disclosed to regulators. They believe this is intentional and could lead to DNA integration and potential cancer risks. The speaker argues that the DNA in the vaccine is different from RNA and can be permanent. They suggest that safer alternatives like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin exist and question the transparency of the FDA. They urge states to protect their citizens and reconsider the use of the vaccine, especially for pregnant women and children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally, there's a difference between using this technology for cancer or for fixing inborn errors in metabolism as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. Speaker 1: The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. My philosophical bent here is I'm sure many of you've heard of Occam's razor. Right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances there could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. Speaker 0: With this DNA being present, what Philip did not touch on is that there are sequences within these plasmids. I personally feel that this is an intentional I believe that there is nefarious intent and I'm going to tell you why and it's something that he didn't touch on. Excuse me, there are there are s v forty sequences within the plasmids meds that were not disclosed to the regulators. The SV40 sequences, if you'll recall the SV40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that contamination of the virus, which is on oncogenic caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people, in the people that receive these vaccines. Now the whole the whole SV40 virus is not in the shots, but what is in the shots is a special sequence it's called a nuclear localization sequence which is in the shot to take the plasma DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria. You would not have to use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for to make lots of copies. This sequence takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated or where, as Philip said, it is most likely to be integrated. Speaker 1: This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just it's a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. Speaker 0: So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not integrate with your DNA is not true and they knew it from the beginning because to say knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. A little nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets it's transcribed into RNA, okay, and then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device, okay? Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years, If you and get pass it on to your kids, right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 0: There's also an s v 40 promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells not bacteria cells. Now Philip has checked something he didn't say which is good news for people Doctor. Buchholz, I keep saying Philip, which is good news for people is that most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact and if there are any that are intact and this is something he should have said we have to check. They can infect the E. Coli in your gut, that's what they're designed to do to infect the to infect E. Coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike factory because they're self replicating and they would self replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again. This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. Speaker 1: You had said earlier nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious Doctor Berkehold, in what sense are you saying that? Speaker 0: The s v forty sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this into back to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the s v forty sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts, thank you so much, then they can cause cancer. Sertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years cause there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination, okay, and we looked to see endotoxin levels. But they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be as parent, why would you hold the data for 75 years? All of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent, tell me why? There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Please protect act your citizens. Please, I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get 1 state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever you can so that other states will follow.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Dr. Janci Lindsay's testimony . . .

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

SC Senate Hearing: Dr. Janci Lindsay From @JesslovesMJK's Substack . . . (I would link to her Substack, but I heard that tweets with links to Substack are being suppressed. So please find Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack and take a look) Janci’s testimony is very important. She is…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA. I just sent them emails and said, hey, you wanna you should look in this. Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. Next is doctor, Jansy Lindsey. I hope you can, I Speaker 1: hope you spoken with many scientists about checking for this months months months ago? None of them would do it. I spoke at the US Senate in December of 2022 about the risk this being passed to our children because of if being reversed transcribed simply from the RNA before we knew that there was DNA in the shots. As soon as I found out there was DNA in the shots, I went all over every social media platform I could get to And started ringing the alarm bell. Exactly. Don't you don't have to play that. At this point I have little time so I'm gonna follow-up to adhesive. Well, just show the ones. The ones side. The ones their So I disagree with doctor Buckholson that I think that this is the most dangerous platform that has ever been released on mankind. That It's very easy to see in the various database where you have more deaths, in just a couple months after the rollout than you have in the past 30 years for all the other vaccines combined. You would have to shrink that and go up. So there we go. So, these are all the other vaccines for the past 30 years combined. And this is what happens sorry. And this is what happened during COVID to deaths from vaccines. Do you see? We're at over 35 1,000 deaths. Typically, you would get no more than 200 deaths in a year for all 30 vaccine or for All of the vaccines combined. This is the past 30 years of deaths from vaccines reported into the VAERS You've already heard earlier that this represents only 1 to 13% of the cases that are normally reported. This is a safety signal. This is a safety signal. This is the platform itself, okay? Okay. In the clinical trials, we saw deaths. We definitely had deaths. That was used in process That's 1 without the contamination. Okay. What may not have been clear is that the shots tested on the people in Clinical trials were vastly different than the shots tested or given to people released on the population. I'm short on time, so I'm trying to Listen. Basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. Every single file that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids. And they're contest some are Contaminated when when Kevin McKernan first tested the vials, he found that, one of the vials contained up to about 30 Percent of the nucleic acid material was in fact DNA. So, this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. This is Significant contamination. Why does that matter? Gene therapy was never brought to market even though it's been over 40 years in development because in the It caused latent cancers that developed 2 to 4 years after these were given because it caused lethal autoimmune Reactions even when you were producing human proteins, not viral proteins, not bacterial proteins, Material proteins that you are displaying on the surface of yourself. Think about the logic of this. In traditional gene therapies, and these are gene therapies, Yes, they would be classified as gene therapies. In traditional gene therapies, you send in a genetic message to make a missing protein. That protein is identical to the protein that should have been in your body, but you're missing. This time we're sending in a sequence and Asking it to make a piece of a viral protein and we're displaying it on ourselves and then our body is attacking it And killing those cells, it doesn't stay in your arm. They said it would stay in your arm. It goes to every single cell in your body, every tissue in Your body it goes to your brain, it goes to your bone marrow, where then your body is able to attack these cells. It is not a healthy platform for this. There's a difference between using this technology for cancer Or for fixing inborn errors in metabolism as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you Understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. With this DNA being present, what Philip did not touch on is that there are Sequences within these plasmids, I personally feel that this is an intentional, I believe that there is nefarious I'm going to tell you why and it's something that he didn't touch on. There are s v forty sequences Excuse me. There are there are s v 40 sequences within the plasmids that were not disclosed to the regulators. The s v forty Sequences, if you recall, the SV 40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that Contamination of the virus, which is on oncogenic, caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people in the people that receive these vaccines. Now the whole poll the whole s v 40 virus is not in the shots. But what is in the shots It's a special sequence. It's called a nuclear localization sequence, which is in the shot to Take the plasma DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria. You would not have To use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for, to make lots of copies. This sequence Takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated Aware, as Philip said, it is most likely to be integrated. So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not Integrate with your DNA is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. That's a problem. There's also an s v Forty promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells, not bacteria cells. Now, Philip has checked And something you didn't say, which is good news, for people. Doctor. Buchholz, I keep saying Philip, which is good news for people is That most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact and if there are any that are intact, and this is something he should have said, we have to check. They can infect the E coli in your gut. That's what they're designed to do, to infect the e to to infect E coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike Because they're self replicating and they would self replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again. That's a problem. They also carry an antibiotic resistant gene cassette to kanamycin and Chantamycin. Cantamycin is the main antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. Neomycin is another antibiotic that's widely used. People that receive these, if it transfects the E. Coli in your gut, it can make that your gut, and Other bacteria, not just that, it can make them resistant to those antibiotics. That is a huge huge risk. And it's something that's known for plasmids. It's something that they've, they're careful to make sure that you don't have these antibiotic resistance genes if If they're making something that should go into gene therapy and now it's here, now it's present. I've worked for several months to try to get these shots recalled. Completely recalled. They're dangerous. Excuse me. I need to get a drink of water, but, they're dangerous. We're Objecting these in our kids. We don't inject contaminated medical products in our kids. Something Doctor. Buchholz didn't touch on as well is if there's that much plasma In the shots, there's a very good chance that there's bacterial endotoxin in the shots. Which means bacterial proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and even death. And that That may be what caused some of the the rapid deaths that occurred right after people got these shots. There's so much more to touch on. We've seen massive Massive cases of miscarriage and stillbirth. Normally, during years we wouldn't see more than 25 cases of miscarriage Or stillbirth for all the vaccines combined. In 2021, we saw three 1428 cases of stillbirth and miscarriage reported into the VAERS system. Remember, no more than 25 typically in a year is normal for all the vaccines combined, 3,428 in 2/22, we saw 1520 Stillbirth and miscarriage. And in halfway through that year, the FDA or the CDC said they They would stop reporting on, they would stop making all their information public because they did not want to encourage vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or misinterpret misinterpretation of the data. So all of a sudden we saw what was what was going like this go like this in February. That's artificial. We can't even trust the data coming of the the CDC anymore. The FDA the FDA knows about this contamination. They're not doing anything. I'm sorry this is so rushed. I just wanted to address what Doctor. Buchholz was not able to. He and I have the Same degrees. I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology, and I'm a toxicologist and an Expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally. This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this In my entire career, we have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies These and children these are contaminated dangerous lethal products. I don't Agree with Doctor. Buchholz, but I believe that he's just seeing a lot of this Donna. I feel like he is where we were 3 years ago. So No. That's basically if I don't leave now, I won't catch my plane. May not catch it anyway. So Speaker 0: You had said earlier, nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious than doctor Burkholder. In What sense are you saying that? Speaker 1: The s v forty sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be Dare to grow this into back to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SB 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to To integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts thank you so much Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk. That's why gene Therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these Vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is gonna tell you about that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, I can tell you, as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. I There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination. Okay, and we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've Got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for 75 years? All All of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent, tell me why. There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give Speaker 0: experimental products to Speaker 1: pregnant women. We don't give experimental products products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Please protect your citizens. Please. I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get 1 state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever Or you can so that other states will follow. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: Thank you, doctor, Lindsey. Any questions? Speaker 1: Again, sorry. I was a little urgent in that. I re scheduled my Uber twice. So Speaker 0: So It's just very difficult to keep this, everything on schedule with him, but thank you for staying So much. Thank you for staying, and thank you for presenting, and we appreciate it so much. Yeah. Speaker 1: If you have any questions, please feel free to Speaker 0: We will be reaching out, I promise. Gene, who's next? Speaker 2: Mr. Chairman, we passed over to meet, To meet time obligations, we passed over, mister Rick Nagel, so it's probably time to call him up now. Speaker 0: Andrew Rick Nagle. Is it Nagle? Yeah. Speaker 2: Nagle. Beg your pardon, sir.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Dr. Phillip Buckhault's testimony . . .

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

DNA in the #Covid Shots: South Carolina Senate Hearing: USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults From @JesslovesMJK's Substack (I would link to her Substack, but I heard that tweets with links to Substack are being suppressed. So please find Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack and take a…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Philip Buchholz, a biochemist and cancer gene researcher, discusses concerns about the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in terms of regulatory oversight and potential risks. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA in addition to mRNA, which could lead to genome modification and autoimmune responses. Dr. Buchholz suggests that the DNA in the vaccine could be responsible for rare but serious side effects and calls for further investigation into its integration into the human genome. He emphasizes the need for improved regulatory processes and urges the FDA to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. Dr. Buchholz also highlights the importance of informed consent and the role of state agencies in ensuring vaccine safety.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a a little bit of what am I doing here? For those of you don't don't don't know me, me, my name is Philip Buchholz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do it's Genomics Research at the University of South Carolina. And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways is that the human genome can get fudged with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Okay? So technically, that means is that I'm very, very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing. Okay. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. And I'm also pretty good, when I say I I mean the people in my laboratory. You're not gonna hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. Detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic, to we invented the COVID test that many of you did a spit test, okay, okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. And so, I've earned a fair amount of respect, in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of COVID testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid, and we told them, know you don't have COVID in your home or yes, you do. So my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and I'm kind of relational in the state of South Carolina. I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues, and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane, of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine, as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved, all right? So first of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that, it stopped infection, but that only lasted for, like, a month. Speaker 1: Doctor Brookhark, could Could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff's telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. Speaker 0: In in my professional the evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And, it was the best of sucky options that we had. And I still believe that, it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire, and we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're gonna learn here. That's my own personal view of this, but I'm also topical dent here is, I'm sure many of you've heard of Occam Occam's razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one a hand lawns razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So the Pfizer is my DNA. It's not just mRNA, it's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector it was used, as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy, and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches which is that we're given out here in Columbia, and I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there, and you can kinda work out what it is listen how it got there, and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism, okay? This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA a of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a a lipid Complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells, and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells, and it becomes a permanent mixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore, amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem themselves, and it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene. I I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And then again, the the the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility. Okay. A little nerdy science here. The central dogma the dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated put it into protein. This is just how life runs. Why why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids, right? So alterations additions to the DNA, they stick around. RNA by its nature is temporary, it doesn't last, and that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine. The pseudo uridine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer, but still it's a transient and phenomenon, we're talking hours to days, okay. And then proteins, once proteins are made they so don't last forever. They they last for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time, maybe a lifetime. So this is a picture of the sequencing read that, the sequencing run that I did, in in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine, and all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine. They don't belong there. They're not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign, and they're there. There's a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks it's around a 100 base pairs, a 120 base pairs. So the DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are are short little pieces, 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base pairs, a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around 100 base why is this important? Because the probability of a DNA, piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability of hitting it. And if you shoot buckshot, you have a bigger probability of hitting it with some shot, right? This all these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot. You have many many thousands of opportunities to modify, a, cell of a vaccinated so the pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process. That's how this got here. In my view, somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated David, and find out if this theoretical risk has happened or not. I think this is a real serious oversight, regulatory oversight, or oversight that happened at the federal level, and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Speaker 1: Doctor Bercow, if you now, are you capable of doing that? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's we do that kind of thing. But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has has to be done by lots of people. Right. Speaker 1: I'll talk to you more about that later. Speaker 0: Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should have been done at the federal Okay. So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have been. This is kind of, again, this is what we do in the lab all the time. And all these little grid and green lines here, these are all independent little pieces of DNA. This must have had a 100,000 pieces of DNA in this this, sequencing run. And you can put them all back together and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent, and it's clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned Spike into it, and they used it that for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, in vitro transcription, where you feed, an RNA polymerase this it's Plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you. Okay. And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nano the whole transfection reagent and now you've got your mRNA vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this. So these little pieces is they did they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing, okay? A little bit of a regulatory note here. The way you do RNA transcription in vitro transcription reactions you have to give it a DNA template, okay, okay, and you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make the RNA, and that's what was done for getting the, emergency use authorization and the clinical trial. That's called process 1 if you look up that kind of stuff. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted, and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial, but that that making that PCR product doesn't scale all the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasmid vector, put the plasmid vector into bacteria and then grow up big vats of the bacteria, they make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. And that's where how the contamination ended up in the production batches even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has regulatory implications for for you guys. We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. This is we're we're good at doing this kind of stuff. This is the same, we made a little PC. A colleague of mine at at MIT made, you know, from who who used to work for the the Broad Institute at MIT, he he made a little, PCR test and we cloned it here. This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test, okay, same same idea and same expertise behind it. And we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue. And you know, I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the little piece that we're looking for is just that little bit right there, okay? But if you see 2,000,000,000 copies of this, there's about 200,000,000,000 of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in in each dose of the vaccine, and it's encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle, so it's ready to be delivered inside the cell. Okay. This is a bad idea. My conclusions from this, we should check a people. My conclusions from this or I should learn how to run PowerPoint. We should check check a bunch of vaccinated people getting tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people, but that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular unharmed people and see if this plasmid DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their stem cells. It leaves a calling card that is there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because it's kinda different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it. This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. Okay. You find it in the stem cells of harmed people. It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead. It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's it's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, should insist that the FDA force Pfizer to get the DNA out of the booster and all future versions of this vaccine. I'm a real fan of this platform, okay? I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really believe that this this platform is revolutionary, and in your lifetime, there will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer, okay, and but they gotta get this problem fixed, okay. And I and I right now, I think the financial incidents too great to just keep on rolling with it, and it's gonna take some encouragement to get it out. The regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the 1st place. I don't think that this the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches it may. In in the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches, and there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low. But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for amount of DNA allowed in a vaccine is a throwback to an era when we were talking about vaccines scenes are like a recombinant protein that you or a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus produced in in CHO cells or something like And the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA, and you might have a little doubt in the vaccine. That's not a problem because naked DNA gets chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside cells, they inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle. It's basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell. So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here, okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here, I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug. And the career incentives of people that approve this are gonna be, there's nothing wrong here. You know, it's gonna take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay. But I really believe this was an appropriate application of an old school regulation to a new kind of vaccine. And who knows, maybe we'll check a bunch of people and we'll find out for sure that this this is indeed not a problem, and that will do the public good if we prove that. Mister chairman. Speaker 1: Senator Cash. Speaker 2: Doctor, we, appreciate all that you're saying, Although we don't understand most of what you're saying. Sorry. Speaker 0: I have a limited amount Speaker 2: of time Here's someone down there agreeing a lot, so you must Must have been a chemistry major or something. But, what what is gonna help us is to know what what you can do, Like checking a bunch of vaccinated people. Speaker 0: Of course, that's what I can do. Right. But Speaker 2: we are not gonna have any authority over FDA to force Pfizer to do something. I mean, that's a federal issue, unless you You can explain to me how we could do something at a state level. You know, some of this is gonna have to be taken up by our congressman. Right? So just Whatever your remaining comments are, just keep in mind Speaker 0: that I understand. Speaker 2: What what we can do and and really these Technical things you're throwing out us is is the senator from Greenville has already mentioned. We're gonna throw right back at you because there's no you're the expert. So So if someone's gonna do this testing, I don't know who would find to do it other than someone like you. Speaker 0: I can do it. Lots of other people can do it. I've had a lot of of, corners and pharmacists from different states contact me. I posted all this on Twitter, right? And so people will private message me and say, I'd like to send you some samples. And then they say, oops, state led regulations will not allow our coroner to send any samples it's for this. So there are some policy issues that can allow this to happen or impede it. I don't know what they are, but I hear here that there are mechanisms in place that will, you know, you can encourage people to do things or not new things, but that's your wheelhouse, not mine. All I can tell you is what I found in the lab and the scientific shuns of it, the policy implications and what to do it, it is out of my above it's above my pay grade. Speaker 1: Mister chairman, Garrett. Speaker 3: Thank you for coming today. I think I Followed most of what you said. President Biden said the other day that there was a new COVID vaccine that and this one really works. Speaker 0: There's no evidence to that as far Speaker 3: as I'm concerned. I understand that, and that's why I'm asking this question. Is there some way you could get a hold of one of I would Speaker 0: love to. Speaker 3: Do the same study that you did on these vials to make sure that we're not using that that DNA protein And whatever it is, the DNA that that that we don't need in to be injected into these, to our constituents. Speaker 0: I would like to do that, and I will not get it unless I get a batch and to and find out that it's free of DNA, and then I'll take it myself. I mean But I don't I don't have any way of compelling that to Ethan. Speaker 3: So it was just basically a way to save money by doing it in such volume that way without then taking it back out Later on. Speaker 0: I think nobody thought about it. I think it was reasonable to use the E. Coli to blow pull up the plasma to make the stuff, and then the the pieces of the DNA are of a very uniform and small size. That's evidence that they took efforts to try to chop it up. And Speaker 3: Then they knew about it. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. They knew it. And they took efforts to chop it up, they just didn't get it Out. Speaker 3: But but but having said that. Speaker 0: I guess that they just didn't think about the the hazard for genome modification because it's not not all that expensive to add another process to get it out. Speaker 3: Well, that's what I'm saying. It it you know? Speaker 0: I can't get inside my mind. Speaker 3: I don't rush too much. And that's what I'm saying. These subsequent, you know, we've heard testimony of these subsequent, you know, variant, subsequent boosters, etcetera, etcetera, are leading To maybe not scientific yet, but at least collateral knowledge that it apparently these things are causing death and disability later on, and also the aging process, which you heard about. Speaker 0: There's a lot of suspicious associations. But I but it seems That's all Speaker 3: that before we can in South Carolina, you know, give this new vaccine a whirl around Here, seems to me that that our people ought to be able to look at that, mister chairman, and see whether or not it's got this DNA. And if it It's fine. Tell everybody that's got the DNA and the and the problems associated therewith, then you got informed Speaker 0: consent. Correct. Speaker 3: Okay. But without that, we Speaker 0: will handle it. Informed consent. Speaker 3: I'm not I'm not really happy about that, mister chairman, and do what I can to try to help. Speaker 0: Knowing what I know saying otherwise. Knowing what I know now about about this, I would still have recommended it to my elderly parents, but I probably would not have given it to my daughters. I feel like my consent was not as informed as it should have been. Speaker 3: Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Representative Morgan. Speaker 4: I almost don't know Where to start? I'm I'm trying not to talk because we're it's a hearing and we want to hear you, but I you have made so many questions come to my mind. And one I should know but I don't Remember what percentage of vaccinated people had this kind of vaccination? Do you know off the top of your head? Like the majority of people that took the vaccine have this Because weren't there multiple types of vaccinations you could take? Speaker 0: The vast majority of people got either Pfizer or Moderna. And and we're talking about the Pfizer? I'm talking about Pfizer. My colleagues leagues have looked at Moderna, and it's in Moderna too in the few that we've looked at. It's just not quite as high. Speaker 4: Okay. Wow. Wait, so you were here today, and you've come to present, and you noticed this. Where could you have gone if we didn't have this kind of ad hoc Fuck hearing. Twitter. So there's no there's no way for you, even at your level of expertise, Is to say, hey, red flag Speaker 0: I I emailed I emailed the FDA and I tweeted at them. That's about the extent of my resources. Speaker 4: It's fascinating to me that in us in the state that we don't have some kind of, I guess it goes to kind The entire thing that we're talking about is that our state agency should have more focus on our citizens health, and you know it's great CDC You can send us stuff but we'll make the decision, and and there should be a way for, especially at your level, to get input to DHEC when You notice something like this immediately and say, hey DHEC, you should consider this. And then they can come and tell us immediately, hey, we need to get authorization. You need to change this regulation to look into this, and it just seems like we've totally dropped the ball in every direction with the state prioritizing, you know, Our decision making on this kind of stuff and and investigating into it. Just letting the, you know, the federal government take it and do a terrible job. Speaker 0: So I had a lot of experience with DHEC rolling out the saliva test. Okay, so we invented the saliva test, and then we had to deal with DHEC who tried to get it rolled out for the state. And it appeared to me that they were just overrun. They weren't prepared for what this pandemic was. And it's no fault of theirs. I thought I I told people at the time that I felt like these were Hobbits in the Shire that were, you know, you know, accustomed to taking care of small problems, and all of a sudden we're in the War of the Ring, and there are orcs at the gate, and we're expecting them to deal with this tremendous challenge. And that's not who we put there, and that's not their fault. I mean, it's just we were not prepared to handle something of this magnitude. So some amount of grace, I think, is appropriate even though we could do better next time by beefing up who's guarding the gates. Speaker 4: If you if you had, tomorrow, fixes To the system, what would they be? Speaker 0: That we could that's your job man out of law. Speaker 4: I mean, since you lived it in and saw based on the research, should we Have somebody actually checking up especially on something that is being pushed statewide. I mean, state resources are being used saying to take this vaccine. Speaker 0: You have to hire people that are qualified I have to tell the feds no. And that's not what we do here usually in South Carolina. We hire people. Sometimes times we say to the no to the Feds just to be ornery because that's our culture in South Carolina, but many times we say, well I don't know, what do other people do? And we hire people all over that they ask, well, what does Clemson do? What does USC? What do they do over in this other state? Instead of putting people in place that we would have confidence in saying no to the to whatever the recommendations were. We put people in that. We often encourage them to not make too many waves and just go ask the feds what they're doing. And that's not their fault, that's the culture that we cultivated. So I So I know that South Carolina culture is no. No. No. We're gonna do our own thing. But in reality, in terms of actually doing stuff, almost always, we people will say, well, what do they do else in another state? Or what are they doing at the Fed level? And I'll just go along with it. Speaker 4: Would it be, And I'm not a medical professional by any stretch. Would it be realistic for anything that is being promoted, especially on a large scale of Vaccinations, you know, coming from who knows where to have it be investigated by people in our state such as yourself, or Is that would that be Speaker 0: to It was reasonable to trust the FDA even though I have my doubts about their independence now. Everybody just trusted the feds to do this. And at the time, that was kinda reasonable. Speaker 4: But going forward, I get that's my question. Going forward, Is it possible, is it reasonable for us to be able to have a system where we could, especially if it's been if the taxpayer money is gonna be used to push it and tell people That we have it set up that it's automatically tested basically or looked into by scientists and medical professionals in our state to determine, Maybe it's in DHEC. Maybe DHEC has that, where they are required to look into it and have their own, you know, summary or Decision on whether or not it's safe and effective since we know that CDC and, FDA and all these are not doing a good job with it. And I and I guess I'm asking you as a professional, are Speaker 2: you do you hear that Speaker 4: and think, wow, that's gonna It costs an insane amount of money, and good luck. Right? Like, no. That's reasonable. Speaker 0: No. No. The the actual, like, scientific experiments are I don't think an insane amount of money. It's having the the regulatory and and financial independence to like say, no, we're not going to do it the way we're told until we find out that it's okay. When in reality, much of our support comes from federal sources. It's like if you have a better idea for how to build the interstate, you kinda have to do what the the federal people tell you regardless, right, we because that's where the money comes from for a lot of the in interstate big infrastructure. And I think I'm not a policy expert, but I I think that a lot of financial support through the health care Stum and and elsewhere was tied to compliance to the federal narratives. And so I don't know that you can create true independence. You you could maybe create some kind of oversight that would enhance public trust in whether it was a good idea or not. But that's a different matter from us being able to go our own way all the time. But that's your that's your leader. That's your area of expertise, not mine. Speaker 4: Yeah. But it is but it is possible to have somebody look into vaccinations and do Nations and do similarly to what you did on Speaker 0: This this I did this on my own money with free student. I mean, yeah. We this is not terribly expensive to do these kinds of tests. Right. But, you know, there has to be in a system that that professors are not gonna be penalized for producing results that are counter to what the party line is supposed to be. And that you can create bubbles of where the protection for people whose job it is to check things. And if they come up with answers that nobody likes, they can still say them. And and you have to create these kind of protection bubbles. Speaker 3: Well, mister chairman. Speaker 1: Yes. I'm gonna Speaker 0: ask him just Speaker 3: a few more questions. Speaker 2: Doctor, have you are you planning to publish these findings? Have you tried to publish these findings in a journal? Speaker 0: No and no. They're not. As of now, they are interesting thing and concerning, but not they don't rise to the level of a peer reviewed publication. The most technically, the best possible outcome would be that I would check a bunch of people, find out it never integrated, and this is not a problem, and then it will never be published because papers don't publish negative results. Kind of the worst outcome is, I can check a bunch to people and I find, oh, it integrated and it's causing these horrible things, and yeah, then I'll get a paper and be famous. But I'm hoping that that's not the way it goes. So So you see how they're in academia for publication, there are all these perverse incentives in place, where the kind of thing you need to be done is is the kind of thing that does not generate a publication. You need a regulatory body to check, find no problem, and tell the public, there's no problem we checked, and there ain't nothing there that will never get published, you know, or very seldom. It's hard to publish negative results like that. And that's why academic science is not the best place to do it. Speaker 2: How long would it take to do what it is you're talking about here, about check a bunch The vaccinated people, I mean, it's it's hard for me listening to all this for the first time to to How alarmed you are and whether in your personal opinion you would hit the pause button on allowing this new vaccine, so To speak, without knowing more. How long does it take and and how serious is it to to find find out this information before people keep taking these vaccines. Speaker 0: It takes about 3 hours to check a vial of vaccine to see if it's got this in it. About $100 of agents. And I'm not gonna get it unless I find a vial that I can check ahead of and make sure it's not there. And if it is there, I'll take a pass on it. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Doc doctor Boethalff, thank you so much for being here. And I would like to say that, I was sort of in the world One of COVID that we've been dealing with with all the lies and cover ups and misinformation out there, I would Almost call you a whistleblower. And doctor Lee, I think we may have found our state surgeon general you're Speaker 0: gonna know. It's not my thank thank you for your confidence in me with us. Speaker 1: What I would like to say is as we wrap it up is I do appreciate you, I understand, where you are employed. And, you and I have had a little conversation about how wonderful tenure is and things Like that. But if you experience any retribution or any harassment for coming forward at this hearing and Stephane, would you please let us know? Because I can assure you, you will have an army behind you to help with whatever You may Speaker 0: come your way. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Rhett Morgan has 1 more question. Crazy. And we've gotta move on. Doctor Actually, is, I think under time constraints Speaker 0: I should Speaker 4: have asked this. So you didn't, have you haven't interacted with DHEC about this specific? No. Okay. Speaker 2: I was Speaker 0: I was just wondering if you had any. I interacted with some, a couple of people at the FDA. I just sent them emails Wilson said, hey, you wanna you should look in this. Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. Next is doctor, Jansy Lindsey.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

#Pfizer shot contaminated with simian virus 40 proteins and DNA that could get into the nucleus of your cells and alter your DNA. Dr @NassMeryl talking with @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JesslovesMJK @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @DrAseemMalhotra 🔊

Video Transcript AI Summary
The presence of DNA plasmids and undisclosed proteins in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine has raised concerns. The DNA plasmids, originating from E. Coli, were not properly removed during manufacturing, resulting in contamination. Additionally, two proteins from the simian virus 40 (SV40) were found in the vaccine, which is associated with certain cancers. SV40 was present in polio vaccines administered to millions of Americans in the past. Injecting these proteins and DNA into the body can potentially lead to mutations and increased risk of cancer. This discovery suggests a higher chance of mutation from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And a recent other issue arose which might explain why so many people are sick after these shots. And that is the presence of DNA plasmids, which initially were thought to be in the vaccine because of a Cheap manufacturing process that didn't get rid of them. So the DNA plasmids from E. Coli are used to manufacture to the RNA in the vaccines. And the vaccines appear to be contaminated with at least 10 times more than should be residual in the vaccine. But then it also turned out that there are 2 proteins in the vaccine that were not disclosed on the on any labels, at least in the Pfizer vaccine, that come from the s v 40 virus, simian virus 40, which is associated in some studies with several cancers. And, you know, came from it it contaminated polio vaccines. So a 100,000,000 Americans apparently got SV 40 from polio vaccines, myself being 1. You probably did also. Speaker 1: I did too. Speaker 0: So anyway, Speaker 1: SV 40, meaning simian virus 40, it's a virus that came out of the monkeys. It was a virus that was in the Trademark of monkey of monkey flesh and kidneys that they use to cultivate the vaccine. So they were cultivating the polio vaccines On a substrate on petri dishes that were made up of masticated monkey kidneys from green monkeys, And they started finding, this is before they knew how to find viruses, and they started finding viruses that were indigenous to monkeys. And people were worried, well, what will happen when you inject these into people? Because, you know, they've never been exposed. And the SV 40 was the 40th one they found. And what they found is that it's very, very carcinogenic. So if you inject it into guinea pigs or gerbils, They sprout tumors. And in fact, it's used in laboratories to develop tumors so that scientists can, you know, do To work on tumor reduction. But our generation, the the 98,000,000 people who American And kids, you know, in the 5th, the late fifties and early sixties who got this. In fact, it was a very famous researcher at NIH named Bernice Eddy Who discovered this virus in the polio vaccine. And she warned NIH, you're, you know, this is a very dangerous Iris that you're gonna give to 90,000,000, a 100000000000 people. And they, she was their most famous scientist at the time. And they removed her telephone. They changed the locks on her lab. They locked her out of her lab, and they put her in a basement, and they ordered her not to talk to anybody. And then she released the study defiantly, and that's how we know about it. But our generation that got it has 10 times the soft tissue cancer of, you know, our parents' generation. And in many of these tumors, they have found SV 40 virus. Oh, you know, it was very worrying. And now, you know, they're finding it in the COVID vaccines. Speaker 0: Right. Not the whole virus, but 2 proteins. But they're important proteins. These are proteins that in conjunction with the DNA, double stranded DNA that is in the Plasmids work to allow that D NAA to get into the nucleus of your cells where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. So the issue you know, we worried before, well, maybe the RNA could be reverse transcribed into DNA. Maybe that would get into the nucleus, but now we find that we're actually being injected with double stranded DNA already with the keys that open the door to the nucleus. So it appears that, again, this was Pfizer vaccines, it appears that There is a much higher chance of mutation from the COVID shots or at least the COVID shots that have been studied.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

I've seen someone authoritatively claim ONLY the SV40 polyA signal is present in the vaccine. This person never looked at the sequence. Here is the region with the SV40 promoter, The 72bp bidirectional SV40 Enhancer, and the SV40 Ori. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41417-018-0039-9

Increasing the bactofection capacity of a mammalian expression vector by removal of the f1 ori - Cancer Gene Therapy Bacterial-mediated cancer therapy has shown great promise in in vivo tumour models with increased survival rates post-bacterial treatment. Improving efficiency of bacterial-mediated tumour regression has focused on controlling and exacerbating bacterial cytotoxicity towards tumours. One mechanism that has been used to carry this out is the process of bactofection where post-invasion, bacteria deliver plasmid-borne mammalian genes into target cells for expression. Here we utilised the cancer-targeting Salmonella Typhimurium strain, SL7207, to carry out bactofection into triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. However, we noted that post-transformation with the commonly used mammalian expression vector pEGFP, S. Typhimurium became filamentous, attenuated and unable to invade target cells efficiently. Filamentation did not occur in Escherichia coli-transformed with the same plasmid. Further investigation identified the region inducing S. Typhimurium filamentation as being the f1 origin of replication (f1 ori), an artefact of historic use of mammalian plasmids for single stranded DNA production. Other f1 ori-containing plasmids also induced the attenuated phenotype, while removal of the f1 ori from pEGFP restored S. Typhimurium virulence and increased the bactofection capacity. This work has implications for interpretation of prior bactofection studies employing f1 ori-containing plasmids in S. Typhimurium, while also indicating that future use of S. Typhimurium in targeting tumours should avoid the use of these plasmids. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@InfiniteCyclus - Cyclus

@c_plushie The SV40 enhancer in the plasmid has a strong nuclear location signal. As explained in this nature article. In the nucleus it will integrate at random disrupting the genome and increase the risk of cancer. https://www.nature.com/articles/3302021

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature - Gene Therapy Although the use of nonviral vectors for gene therapy offers distinct advantages including the lack of significant inflammatory and immune responses, the levels of expression in vivo remain much lower than those obtained with their viral counterparts. One reason for such low expression is that unlike many viruses, plasmids have not evolved mechanisms to target to the nucleus of the nondividing cell. In the absence of mitosis, plasmids are imported into the nucleus in a sequence-specific manner, and we have shown in cultured cells by transfection and microinjection experiments that the SV40 enhancer mediates plasmid nuclear import in all cell types tested (Dean et al., 1999, Exp Cell Res 253: 713–722). To test the effect of this import sequence on gene transfer in the intact animal, we have recently developed an electroporation method for DNA delivery to the intact mesenteric vasculature of the rat. Plasmids expressing luciferase or GFP from the CMV immediate-early promoter/enhancer and either containing or lacking the SV40 enhancer downstream of the reporter gene were transferred to the vasculature by electroporation. When transfected into actively dividing populations of smooth muscle or epithelial cells, the plasmids gave similar levels of expression. By contrast, the presence of the SV40 sequence greatly enhanced gene expression of both reporters in the target tissue. At 2 days post-transfer, plasmids with the SV40 sequence gave 10-fold higher levels of luciferase expression, and at 3 days the difference was over 40-fold. The presence of the SV40 sequence did not simply increase the rate of nuclear import and expression, since expression from the SV40-lacking plasmid did not increase beyond that seen at day 2, the time of maximum expression for either plasmid. In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that the increased gene transfer and expression was indeed due to increased nuclear localization of the delivered SV40 sequence-containing plasmid. Based on these findings, the ability to target DNA to the nucleus can increase gene transfer in vivo and inclusion of the SV40 sequence into plasmids will enhance nonviral gene delivery. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Substack from @Kevin_McKernan https://anandamide.substack.com/p/south-carolina-senate-hearing

South Carolina Senate Hearing Dr. Phillip Buckhaults anandamide.substack.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

More labs find more DNA contamination in the shots. MMD tests 4 lots. Finds DNA in all of them. @weldeiry @P_J_Buckhaults @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @JanciToxDoc @JanJekielek @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @US_FDA @CDCgov

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

NEW!!! - Topic today: "#Supergau and escalation - #DNA detected in #modRNA #vaccine #BNT162b2." NOW IT'S PROVEN - DNA IN BNT162b2! AND - BMG ignores it! Official misconduct doesn't get any crasser than this. Here clear indication of § 5 AMG - serious suspicion of a questionable…

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

NEW!!! - Topic today: "#Supergau and escalation - #DNA detected in #modRNA #vaccine #BNT162b2." NOW IT'S PROVEN - DNA IN BNT162b2! AND - BMG ignores it! Official misconduct doesn't get any crasser than this. Here clear indication of § 5 AMG - serious suspicion of a questionable…

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

If you click on the post below, another thread will open up with more videos:

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Both @NZStuff and the government told us the #Pfizer shot, which was given to millions of Kiwis, could not alter your DNA. This was 'The Whole Truth'. It was the information we could rely on, from the 'single source of truth'. And we were told to dismiss everything else as…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two experts with degrees in biochemistry and molecular biology discuss the claim that COVID-19 vaccines alter DNA. While one expert expresses concern about DNA integration and potential long-term effects, the other clarifies that the vaccine does not enter the nucleus where DNA resides. They explain that the vaccine's DNA can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, but it is not a temporary change and becomes a permanent part of the cell and its descendants. They emphasize that the vaccine does not contain anything that can affect DNA. The video concludes by highlighting the partnership between Stuff, Maori Television, and the Pacific Media Network, with funding from the Google News Initiative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have Speaker 1: a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology, and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally. Speaker 2: I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm I'm, I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. Speaker 0: When was the last time you saw one of these? Probably not since high school, right? Speaker 2: The Pfizer, vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. Speaker 0: It's a strand of DNA, The genetic code found in almost every cell in your body containing the unique markers that make you, you. Speaker 2: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. DNA gets transcribed into and then RNA gets translated into protein. DNA is a long lived information storage device. What you born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you Pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 0: Well, recently, I've heard a pretty scary rumour doing the rounds. A claim that COVID nineteen vaccines actually alter your DNA. So is it true? Here's the important part. The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells. That is where your DNA lives. Speaker 2: This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just The way it works, we do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer Vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. Speaker 1: So all this about they will not go to the nucleus Speaker 0: The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells Speaker 1: They will not integrate with your DNA Speaker 0: The vaccine does not contain anything that can affect your DNA. Speaker 1: Is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 0: So there you have it. If you were worried about the vaccine changing your DNA, fear not. Speaker 2: This DNA, can and likely It'll integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 3: The double stranded DNA that is in the plasmids work to allow that D NAA to get into the nucleus of your cells Where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 1: There is something very unusual going on here That is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never Been done before. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 1: I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. Speaker 0: The whole truth about the COVID vaccine is a series from Stuff made in partnership with Maori Television and the Pacific Media Network. Speaker 2: I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Speaker 0: We received Funding from the Google News Initiative.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

@Incrementallog1 @djindji5 @DisclosureUAP @BarbarasGhost1 @liz_churchill10 @PatientCV @jamesroguski @Najadi4Justice @Nonvaxer420BACK @KathMLee1 @MegnaAve @freemoneyman420 @mariaaazeee @NickHudsonCT @drvandanashiva @bell00david @BrianOSheaSPI @IamBrookJackson @naomirwolf @gc22gc @SenseReceptor @Kingston_Truth @DavebNixon @Berniespofforth @Doctor_I_am_The @VeraSharav @ShabnamPalesaMo @BarelyBook @davidicke @_jenniferlong @Thomas_Binder @NoorBinLadin @AllBiteNoBark88 @MarkFriesen08 @KLVeritas @jathorpmfm @ABridgen @NassMeryl @DrAnaMihalcea @RenzTom @Stuckelberger @XOPlanetMother @carrie_madej @BanounHelene @P_J_Buckhaults @sasha_latypova @JanciToxDoc @DrDMartinWorld @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan Dr.Sucharit Bhakdi:"There is NO way to be sure you have removed all the #DNA(books of life)from the manufacturing soup of these #mRNA vax,when manufacturing on mass scale."‼️ "It's too expensive to remove it. Every mRNA vax released to the market is cont@minated."‼️🙏👇 #vaccine

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential contamination of RNA vaccines and the lack of control and regulation surrounding their authorization. They mention that purification methods may fail, resulting in the presence of remaining books of life in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern over the automatic authorization of future RNA vaccines without considering efficacy, safety, or contamination. They highlight that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have declared their intention to implement RNA vaccination in all areas of human and veterinary medicine. The conversation ends with a comment about the situation being concerning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they would have had some form of purification method, whatever it is, it's failed. Is that would be a fake Well, you Speaker 1: see yeah. If if you do this on a on a small scale, you can really, purify the the copies, and leave the books behind. But if you're doing this on a mass scale, there's no way there is no way, to to really be sure that you haven't, remaining books of life in the soup, okay? And that's why every RNA vaccine that is being released to the market is bound to be similarly contaminated. It's bound to be. Okay? And the horrible and awful thing that just occurred last week is that, all the authorities, the FDA, whatever you want. And the WHO and the CDC, I don't know who has done all of this, have decided that all future RNA vaccines are going to be automatically authorized without any control at all, neither for efficacy nor for safety nor for contamination. And as you know, the WHO and the CDC have declared that they're going to, install RNA vaccination in all realms of, human and veterinary medicine for all vaccines and they've started already. Speaker 0: So It's just a polling.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature https://www.nature.com/articles/3302021

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature - Gene Therapy Although the use of nonviral vectors for gene therapy offers distinct advantages including the lack of significant inflammatory and immune responses, the levels of expression in vivo remain much lower than those obtained with their viral counterparts. One reason for such low expression is that unlike many viruses, plasmids have not evolved mechanisms to target to the nucleus of the nondividing cell. In the absence of mitosis, plasmids are imported into the nucleus in a sequence-specific manner, and we have shown in cultured cells by transfection and microinjection experiments that the SV40 enhancer mediates plasmid nuclear import in all cell types tested (Dean et al., 1999, Exp Cell Res 253: 713–722). To test the effect of this import sequence on gene transfer in the intact animal, we have recently developed an electroporation method for DNA delivery to the intact mesenteric vasculature of the rat. Plasmids expressing luciferase or GFP from the CMV immediate-early promoter/enhancer and either containing or lacking the SV40 enhancer downstream of the reporter gene were transferred to the vasculature by electroporation. When transfected into actively dividing populations of smooth muscle or epithelial cells, the plasmids gave similar levels of expression. By contrast, the presence of the SV40 sequence greatly enhanced gene expression of both reporters in the target tissue. At 2 days post-transfer, plasmids with the SV40 sequence gave 10-fold higher levels of luciferase expression, and at 3 days the difference was over 40-fold. The presence of the SV40 sequence did not simply increase the rate of nuclear import and expression, since expression from the SV40-lacking plasmid did not increase beyond that seen at day 2, the time of maximum expression for either plasmid. In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that the increased gene transfer and expression was indeed due to increased nuclear localization of the delivered SV40 sequence-containing plasmid. Based on these findings, the ability to target DNA to the nucleus can increase gene transfer in vivo and inclusion of the SV40 sequence into plasmids will enhance nonviral gene delivery. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Paper referenced in the above nature article. h/t @InfiniteCyclus "We show that, although fragments throughout this region can support varying degrees of nuclear import, the 72 bp repeats of the SV40 enhancer facilitate maximal transport." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152905/

Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import The nuclear envelope is a major barrier for nuclear uptake of plasmids and represents one of the most significant unsolved problems of non-viral gene delivery. We have previously shown that the nuclear entry of plasmid DNA is sequence-specific, requiring ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines, and the FDA responds @MaryanneDemasi https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/exclusive-an-interview-with-buckhaults?r=p03ac&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines... and the FDA responds Earlier this year, genomics expert Kevin McKernan first discovered DNA contamination in vials of Pfizer and Moderna’s bivalent booster shots. He published his findings in a pre-print, but the research received little attention from the mainstream media. maryannedemasi.substack.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Researchers “alarmed” to find DNA contamination in Pfizer covid-19 vaccine https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/researchers-alarmed-to-find-dna-contamination

Researchers “alarmed” to find DNA contamination in Pfizer covid-19 vaccine A researcher testifies before a South Carolina Senate hearing about the discovery of DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine maryannedemasi.substack.com
robinmonotti
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 8:10 AM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 11:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Genomics scientist Kevin McKernan discovered that Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines were allegedly contaminated with plasmid DNA. The vials contained up to 1870 times more DNA contamination than allowed by regulatory agencies. McKernan found an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine, which is not supposed to be present in mRNA vaccines. Urgent research is needed to determine if DNA contamination persists in vaccinated individuals and if the human genome has been altered. [Link: https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots] #KevinMcKernan

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

"Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines as controls. He was ‘shocked’ to find that they were allegedly contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA. McKernan, who has 25 years’ experience in his field, ran the experiment again, confirming that the vials contained up to, in his opinion, 18-70 times more DNA contamination than the legal limits allowed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In particular, McKernan was alarmed to find the presence of an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer vaccine vials. This is a sequence that is, ‘…used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies,’ McKernan explains. This is something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines.. ..Now, McKernan, Dr Buckhaults and other scientists are calling for urgent research to test whether the DNA contamination is lingering in the cells of mRNA vaccinated people, and whether the human genome has in fact been altered by mRNA Covid vaccines."

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots/

Scientists ‘shocked’ and ‘alarmed’ at what’s in the mRNA shots | The Spectator Australia Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA… spectator.com.au

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

Any questions pls include: @Kevin_McKernan

Hiljaa_Tulee
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 8:47 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 1:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Contaminant DNA fragments can integrate with a person's genome, causing autoimmune issues and cancers. These genome changes are long-lasting, persisting for generations.

@Hiljaa_Tulee - Matti Hirvonen

"...the contaminant DNA fragments will integrate with a person’s genome and become a ‘permanent fixture of the cell’ leading to autoimmune problems and cancers...these genome changes can ‘last for generations’." https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/09/scientists-shocked-and-alarmed-at-whats-in-the-mrna-shots

Scientists ‘shocked’ and ‘alarmed’ at what’s in the mRNA shots | The Spectator Australia Early in 2023, genomics scientist Kevin McKernan made an accidental discovery. While running an experiment in his Boston lab, McKernan used some vials of mRNA… spectator.com.au

@Hiljaa_Tulee - Matti Hirvonen

https://t.co/Wjxt7WYzDP

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

YouTube removed this video, so share it everywhere!!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Various vaccines are being linked to multiple industries. The motive behind this is money. The companies are earning $60 billion annually from vaccine sales, but a staggering $500 billion from selling remedies for vaccine-related injuries. This includes medications for diabetes, ADHD, asthma, seizures, and more. It's a profitable business strategy: make people sick and then provide them with lifelong treatments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Linking various vaccines to all of those industries. So what are they doing? This for money? Well, they're making $60,000,000,000 a year selling us vaccines, vaccines, but they're making $500,000,000,000 a year selling the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines. Wow. The diabetes medication, the Adderall, the Ritalin, the concert, the Advair hair inhalers, the albuterol inhalers, the anti seizure medications, all of those. You know, this is a really great business plan for these companies. Make people sick and then you tell them a lifetime
SenseReceptor
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 1:17 AM
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 5:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a shocking revelation, it has been discovered that the mRNA injections from Pfizer and Moderna are causing the formation of triple-helix DNA. Byram Bridle, a professor at the University of Guelph's Vet College, explains that these genetic structures are not natural and can remain attached to the DNA. Unfortunately, the DNase enzyme used to remove DNA cannot digest these novel constructs. This raises concerns about the long-term effects of these modified RNA injections.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

🚨HOLY SH*T! THE INJECTIONS ARE CAUSING FORMATION OF TRIPLE-HELIX DNA! 🚨 BACKED UP BY MODERNA PATENT! (TWEET 1/3) Byram Bridle (prof @ U of Guelph’s Vet College): "by using modified RNA what these companies [Pfizer and Moderna] ended up with are these very odd genetic structures that do not occur naturally... what people have found is that with this modified RNA, you end up with these RNAs that can remain attached to the DNA and, in essence, you end up with these three strands now—three strands!" Bridle further explaining for @LauraLynnTT : "This DNase that I mentioned... that can be put into the concoction to get rid of the DNA cannot digest these triple-stranded, completely novel genetic constructs."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it turns out that Kevin discovered that these vials are badly contaminated with bacterial DNA. So initially, many of us as scientists say, how could this happen? It's very easy to get rid of this. It shouldn't be there. Now, this is important because what we've learned is by using modified RNA, what these companies ended up with are these very odd genetic structures that do not occur naturally. So many people will know may be familiar with the the the DNA that I mentioned, and, for example, that make up our chromosomes. Yes. It's in what we call a double a double helix. But what it is is 2 strands, 2 strands of DNA that are wrapped around one another. That's the natural form. What has what people have found is with this modified RNA, you end up with these, RNAs that can remain attached to the DNA. And in essence, you end up with these 3 strands now, 3 strands. And as DNase that I mentioned to you that could be put, like, we put into these, that can be put into the concoction to get rid of the DNA, cannot digest these triple stranded, completely novel, genetic constructs. And so, what it meant is when they sprinkled in this enzyme called DNase one, they were not able to efficiently remove the DNA. So there's all kinds of it now contaminating these shots. And it's really kind of scary. And the other thing is, what I what I should point out to you to not take, Pfizer and Moderna off the hook with that, is they should have looked at this. Right? This to me is a classic example of warp speed not working. We were told that when these things were developed at warp speed, no corners were cut. There's many examples now where we know the corners were cut, and this is to me an egregious one. Because in the manufacturing process, there are enzymes that they could put in that would get rid of this. Right, they're so they, what they used is the most common enzyme that would be used with natural mRNA. But again, this is why when you start working with completely unnatural products that we haven't worked with before, you can't make any assumptions as you can see. Right? And they did. And and the procedure that used to work in the past with natural mRNA doesn't work with this modified RNA, and so we've been left with all this DNA contaminating. So that's where it comes from. This DNA was used to manufacture the modified RNAs, and then it was supposed to be removed from the products, put that removal process did not work properly, and so there's lots of it in there. And there's there's multiple aspects of that which are quite scary.
RenzTom
Posted - November 24, 2023 at 5:44 PM
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 2:36 AM

@RenzTom - Tom Renz

mRNA in Food - It's Worse Than We Knew #COVID #vaccines #FoodSupply #mRNA #modRNA #GeneTherapy https://t.co/EU1OX9oujQ

wideawake_media
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 11:58 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 9:06 PM

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Thanks to the work of Bill Gates and others, soon absolutely everything we consume―from vegetables, to dairy, to meat―will contain mRNA, whether we like it or not. https://t.co/FjV5kiJRFy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Gates Foundation and DFID have partnered on various projects, including their work on Livestock. Their efforts focus on improving animal survival through vaccines and better genetics, resulting in increased productivity. In Ethiopia, chickens are laying more eggs, providing better nutrition, and even contributing to small household savings. Edinburgh is a hub for top-notch research in this field, which is why scientists in the city are being funded by Dipit and the Gates Foundation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the Gates Foundation has partnered with DFID on a great number of things and among those are our work we do together on Livestock. Helping animals survive either by having vaccines or better genetics, helping them be more productive, it's making a big difference. Down in Ethiopia, seeing how chickens are out there, laying more eggs, getting more nutrition, and even some small savings into the household. So, Edinburgh happens to be where a lot of the world's best work on this is done and that's why Dipit and the Gates Foundation are funding scientists here.
stkirsch
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 3:19 AM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 3:20 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The Covid vaccine can permanently integrate into your DNA. They simply forgot to tell you that. It was an honest mistake. And they will simply forget to admit it too. Got it? https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-integrate-into-human?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

COVID Vaccines Integrate Into Human DNA, Study Finds The much-ridiculed "antivax trope" proved to be true igor-chudov.com
c_plushie
Posted - January 15, 2024 at 9:52 PM
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 11:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer shot, given to millions in New Zealand, was believed to not integrate with DNA. However, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Surgeon General of Florida, stated that foreign DNA could enter cells through the mRNA COVID vax. Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testified that the Pfizer shot is contaminated with DNA and SV40 sequences, which can alter genetic code, infect E.coli, and cause cancer. Full testimonies are available. #Pfizer #mRNA #COVIDvax

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Both @NZStuff and the government told us the #Pfizer shot, which was given to millions of Kiwis, could not integrate with your DNA. This was 'The Whole Truth'. It was the information we could rely on, from the 'single source of truth', and we were told to dismiss everything else as misinformation. @JanciToxDoc @jehancasinader @NassMeryl @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @nzfirst @TuckerCarlson @FLSurgeonGen @MurfittTauranga

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and work as a toxicologist and expert witness. The Pfizer vaccine is said to be contaminated with plasma DNA, which is different from RNA as it can be permanent and passed on to future generations. However, the vaccine does not enter the nucleus where DNA resides. The DNA in the vaccine can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, becoming a permanent part of the cell. Despite claims that the vaccine alters DNA, it does not contain anything that can affect DNA. The concerns raised about the vaccine's impact on DNA are unfounded.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology. And I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and Speaker 1: I have a PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically I do cancer Genomics Research at the University of South Carolina When was the Speaker 2: last time you saw one of these? Probably not since high school, right? Speaker 1: The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. Speaker 2: It's a strand of DNA. The genetic code found in almost every cell in your body containing the unique markers that make you, you. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA Being in the vaccine, it's different from RNA because it can be permanent DNA gets transcribed into RNA and then RNA gets translated into protein DNA is a long lived information storage device What you were born with, you're going to die with and pass on to your kids DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years. And it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids. Right? So, alterations To the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 2: Well recently I've heard a pretty scary rumour doing the rounds. A claim that COVID nineteen vaccines alter your DNA. So is it true? Here's the important part. The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells. That is where your DNA lives. Speaker 1: This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces the DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that Speaker 0: So all of this about they will not go to the nucleus Speaker 2: See never enters the nucleus of your cells. Speaker 0: They will not integrate with your DNA. Speaker 2: The vaccine does not contain anything that can affect Your DNA Speaker 0: is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 2: So there you have it. If you were worried about the vaccine changing your DNA, fear not. Speaker 1: This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 3: The double stranded DNA that is in the plasmids work to allow that DNA a to get into the nucleus of your cells Where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. Fear not. Speaker 0: There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently The babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 0: I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot Not inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. Speaker 2: The whole truth about the COVID vaccine is a series from Stuff made in partnership with Maori Television and the Pacific Media Network. Speaker 1: I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futsed with during your lifetime, and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Speaker 2: We received Funding from the Google News Initiative.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Could foreign DNA enter your cells through the mRNA COVID vax and change your DNA — and humanity itself — forever? Sounds nutty. It's not. "Absolutely that could happen," says Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the surgeon general of Florida. A shocking conversation. https://t.co/Yvt38eStPf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Laudipo, has called for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to concerns about DNA integration with the human genome. He explains that these vaccines contain DNA, which is not necessarily a problem on its own, but becomes an issue because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and enters people's cells. This is different from other products that have DNA. The FDA's failure to test for DNA integration, despite their own guidelines, is deemed intolerable. Dr. Laudipo emphasizes the need for specific tests to confirm that foreign DNA is not integrating into the human genome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very few public health officials in this country seem very interested in public health in case you haven't noticed. The Surgeon General of Florida, doctor Joseph Laudipo, is an exception to that. He is interested in the health of the people of his state. And because he is, he's taken a close look at what's in the COVID vax the one that everyone in the country was required to take not so long ago and he's come up short he can answer some basic questions about it and that's a concern if we're doing science which he is and so he has now called on doctors to immediately stop giving the mRNA COVID vax to their patients and for a very interesting reason that you should know about here's his statement we're quoting I'm calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines scenes. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID nineteen vaccine safety. But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome as their own guidelines dictate when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA is intolerable think about that it's one thing if it gives you a heart attack if it tempers with your DNA in some way now we have a real problem considering a 1,000,000,000 people got it so in a recent interview about the MRA vaccines the Surgeon General of Florida described them this way Speaker 1: These vaccines have DNA in them. Everyone knows what DNA is. They're contaminated with DNA, and that's not necessarily a big deal. But it's a problem with these vaccines because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and goes into people's cells. So this is a completely different risk analysis than other products that have had DNA. These vaccines are honestly, they're they're the antichrist Of all products. Speaker 0: The antichrist of all products. The surgeon general of Florida joins us now to playing what he means. Doctor, thank you so much for coming on. I remember at the beginning of the its mandates there were people on the fringes as we say who raised questions about the the potential of this drug this brand new this novel vaccine which wasn't really a vaccine to affect people's DNA and they were immediately described as crazy. Tell us your concerns if you wouldn't mind flushing out a little bit what we saw in that clip. Speaker 1: You know, it's It's so interesting to hear you say that, Tucker, because I had the same impression when people very early on were reciting concerns about DNA. I think that really what was happening is that their intuition was informing them about a potential problem with these vaccines. And, you know, you showed that clip there. This one is is sometimes I honestly, I feel quite guilty dragging people through the scientific details, but I try and do it at a level that hopefully won't bore people to to death or be too painful because it is a very important issue And it's not a complicated issue and it's important for people to recognize the difference between the honest facts, which is what I'm sharing and the spin and dodge and look over here that you hear doctor Kalief at the FDA and other, you know, doctor Offutt, other people sharing. So it's actually very simple. We all know what DNA is, You know, this is this is our genetic blueprint, our gift from God. And this DNA can be affected and that can be obviously a very bad thing. Sometimes it's affected in a way that makes people sick. Sometimes it can even be infected in a way that leads people to pass on characteristics to their to their offspring. In this particular case with the mRNA vaccines, They have DNA in them like, you know, like many other vaccines or other biologic type of medications And that, as I've said previously, is not such a big deal because fortunately, DNA is not some big hairy monster that Can, you know, live forever when it's foreign in people's bodies. Our bodies have lots of mechanisms to break them down. But the problem here is that you know the for the same reason that scientists won a Nobel Prize, this DNA isn't like other DNA in terms of having a very hard time penetrating into cells. This DNA hangs on with mRNA in that lipid nano particle that people hear and frankly probably roll their eyes out their eyes over. It hangs on with it and it comes into the cells almost certainly hitchhiking along with the mRNA. So Whereas in the past, DNA would have a very hard time even entering cells. Here, the DNA is getting delivered into cells with the lipid nanoparticles. And that's a problem. And that's a problem because each dose of mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine Probably contains, it's been estimated between billions and hundreds of billions of fragments of DNA. So this is a completely Different risk analysis. That is obvious. You don't need a PhD to be able to figure that out. And the FDA's own guidance About contaminating DNA. Published guidance, their words, never referred to by them by the way in their counter arguments. But their words Are that there are situations when you need to confirm that DNA that is a contaminant or foreign DNA is not integrating into human DNA, into the human genome and there are specific tests, sequencing test to do this, to make sure it's done. And what we did is we asked the FDA, Well, have you done this? You've acknowledged this risk. Have you done this? And they came back with about 10,000 words talking about everything from what time the sun sets in China to, you know, their their third cousins, you know, Bar Mitzvah And nothing about the specific question we ask, along with other questions, by the way, but nothing about that, which leads me to conclude They haven't done it, which is I mean, they you know, it it starts at crazy, but it ends at somewhere else. That someone could be just So just so nonchalant and frankly, willy nilly with something as precious and as, you know, sacred as our human DNA. So that's

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Thread from last year https://t.co/AGcbISG3Io

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

🧵 THREAD DNA & SV40 In The #Pfizer Shot Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer. This video has excerpts from the testimonies of Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Please watch their full testimonies which I've posted in the thread below. @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @nzdsos @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @mattletiss7 @NickHudsonCT 🔊

VictorFromDE
Posted - February 9, 2024 at 2:05 AM
Saved - February 9, 2024 at 2:59 AM

@VictorFromDE - Victor Scott

When Gates says they are injecting "genetically modified organisms", you should take him literally. He slipped up. You are being given half truths about what is really in the vaccines. Organisms, graphene or anything else doing the real damage will be kept hidden. https://t.co/UgTT8AsUkx

iluminatibot
Posted - February 23, 2024 at 12:21 PM
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 9:29 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Thanks to the work of Bill Gates and other psychopaths, soon absolutely everything we consume from vegetables, to dairy, to meat will contain mRNA, whether we like it or not https://t.co/UV2BPqi51L

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Gates Foundation and Difida collaborate on livestock projects, improving animal health and productivity through vaccines and genetics. In Ethiopia, chickens are laying more eggs, providing better nutrition and savings for households. Edinburgh is a hub for top research in this field, with Difida and the Gates Foundation supporting scientists there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the Gates Foundation has partnered with Difida on a great number of things, and, among those are our work we do together on livestock. Helping animals survive, either by having vaccines or better genetics, helping them be more productive, it's making a big difference. Down in Ethiopia, I've seen how chickens are out there laying more eggs, getting more nutrition, and even some small savings into the household. So Edinburgh happens to be where a lot of the world's best work on this is done, and that's why Dithit and the Gates Foundation are are funding scientists here.
dystopian_DU
Posted - March 21, 2024 at 11:09 PM
Saved - March 22, 2024 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New evidence suggests that DNA contamination in mRNA Covid vaccines can enter human cells, including the cell nucleus, and integrate with human DNA. Independent lab testing on ovarian cancer cell lines showed that contaminant DNA from Pfizer's vaccine not only crossed into the cells but also survived multiple cell divisions. Further research is needed to understand the implications of this finding.

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

DNA contamination in mRNA Covid vaccines DOES get into human cells, new evidence shows. It also appears that the contamination enters the cell nucleus and integrates with human DNA. More research is needed. https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/dna-contamination-in-covid-vaccines @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher

DNA contamination in Covid vaccines DOES get into human cells, new evidence shows It also appears that the contamination enters the cell nucleus and integrates with human DNA news.rebekahbarnett.com.au

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

Regulators and fact checkers claim that plasmid DNA contamination in the Covid vaccines can’t change your genomic DNA, but new evidence suggests that it actually can.

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

Results from independent lab testing conducted on ovarian cancer cell lines show that contaminant DNA from Pfizer’s Covid vaccine not only crossed into the cells, but that it survived multiple cell divisions. (Image via @Kevin_McKernan)

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

This is suggestive that the contaminant DNA is able to transfect (enter) the cell nucleus, and that it integrated with the human cell DNA. Read more: https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/dna-contamination-in-covid-vaccines

DNA contamination in Covid vaccines DOES get into human cells, new evidence shows It also appears that the contamination enters the cell nucleus and integrates with human DNA news.rebekahbarnett.com.au

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

@TexasLindsay_ @SydneyLWatson @P_McCulloughMD @JoshWalkos @ClareCraigPath @ProfTimNoakes @Jikkyleaks @RWMaloneMD @CraigKellyPHON @zeee_media @TheChiefNerd @disclosetv

JesslovesMJK
Posted - May 8, 2024 at 4:36 AM
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
GMOs are organisms with genetically altered material, while gene therapy involves modifying genetic material for medical purposes. The mRNA COVID-19 shots can be considered both GMOs and gene therapies due to certain elements present. Health authorities need to address these concerns and provide evidence of safety. Separate applications are required for GMO/gene therapy classification.

@JesslovesMJK - Jessica Rose 🤙

"GMOs are organisms that have had their genetic material altered using genetic engineering techniques." "Gene therapy is a medical treatment that involves altering the genetic material of cells to prevent or treat genetic disorders or diseases." The modified mRNA COVID-19 shots are GMOs because of N1-methylpseudoUs, in a nutshell. They also classify as gene therapies because of DNA contamination, including SV40, albeit, in all likelihood, 'accidental'. In any, case, Health Canada, the EMA and the FDA KNOW now about these issues, and there can be no claim of non-harm associated with these issues unless research is done to provide evidence of non-harm. Show me the data. By the way, one requires a separate investigational new drug application (IND) to be submitted to FDA in cases of GMO/gene therapy [new/re] classification. @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @Kevin_McKernan @Double_Christ @ZackStieber @NChartierET

DrJBhattacharya
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 2:08 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 2:24 PM

@DrJBhattacharya - Jay Bhattacharya

The mRNA platform hijacks human cells to make proteins from "code." But is there accurate control over the dose, distribution, & fidelity of those proteins? What if there isn't? New Illusion of Consensus podcast with my friend, scientist @MartinZ_uncut. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGlT4hT2ZBk

SaiKate108
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across alarming information regarding mRNA vaccines. Lawyer Tom Renz has a 2006 document showing that the FDA was aware of the potential long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapy. This concern is further supported by recent findings from the FDA's own lab, which revealed that DNA contamination in the vaccines exceeds safety limits by significant margins. These revelations suggest that the mRNA platform should be halted. Additionally, I recommend following sources that provide thorough investigative journalism on this topic.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

The FDA knew for years the dangers of MRNA. Lawyer Tom Renz has a 2006 document where the FDA acknowledge the MRNA gene therapy products had the potential to cause cancer in the long term. Now confirmed by their own lab findings of high level DNA contamination in the shots. The MRNA platform needs to be shut down.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent Pfizer data reveals DNA contamination and acknowledges that liquid nanoparticles can spread throughout the body, contradicting previous denials. Concerns are raised about potential links between mRNA vaccines and cancer, referencing a 2006 FDA document warning about long-term cancer risks associated with mRNA gene therapies. Despite the push for mRNA in flu vaccines, long-term safety studies are lacking. Evidence suggests that these therapies may indeed pose cancer risks. The speaker expresses confidence that within five years, the connection to cancer will become undeniable, citing existing documents and admissions that indicate serious risks, even if they are not openly acknowledged.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did did you see that the Pfizer or some Pfizer data today that came out suggesting, oh, shocking. There's DNA contamination at a level that had been previously denied. And that 2, there was some distribution of liquid nanoparticle, sort of admission that, oh, yeah, it goes everywhere. So so it's slowly trickling out what has always been called, quackery and nonsense and conspiracy theory. So here it comes. Speaker 1: Well, you got SV 40, possibly some promoters, the pseudo uridine, all these things. Is this what's behind the turbo cancer? And, you know, doc, I've never ever I'm a lawyer, not a doctor. Right? So I read the science. I understand it, but I can't perform the science. But Mhmm. You know, I've came on here and we've talked about it. I've got a 2006 document from the FDA saying, hey. These m mRNA gene therapy type products have the potential to create cancer on the long term. Well, now we see these guys trying to push to get mRNA in the flu vaccine. We still haven't had the 10 to 20 year look back studies that we need to to determine whether these gene therapies are safe or effective or whether they do cause cancers and these sorts of things. But all the evidence is pointing to the fact that they do. And I, you know, I will right here say, I will bet you any amount of money you wanna bet that over the next 5 years, I will very sadly and I I actually I wish I was wrong on this. I'll be proven right on this cancer. I don't need as a lawyer, I don't need to wait for a study. I've got beyond a reasonable doubt in terms of that. Yeah. I got opposing party admissions. I've got their documents. I've got their papers. They don't admit to this stuff, you know, unless unless it's really happening. I mean, no one's gonna say that this is a a risk. What?

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

A must follow for great investigative journalism!!

@MaryanneDemasi - Maryanne Demasi, PhD

💥EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines Explosive revelations as a study conducted at FDA's own lab found residual DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Experts say it's a 'smoking gun.' https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/exclusive-fda-lab-uncovers-excess @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks

EXCLUSIVE: FDA lab uncovers excess DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines Explosive revelations as a study conducted at FDA's own lab found residual DNA levels exceeded safety limits by 6 to 470 times. Experts say it's a 'smoking gun.' blog.maryannedemasi.com
newstart_2024
Posted - October 5, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi argues that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines represent a premeditated medical crime, asserting that the public served as test subjects due to a lack of legitimate testing. He highlights that BioNTech had no animal facilities, with official documents stating relevant data would emerge post-marketing. Bhakdi claims peer-reviewed studies confirm contamination of the vials with bacterial DNA, which reprograms human cells to produce spike proteins, effectively turning vaccinated individuals into genetically modified organisms. He concludes this was a deliberate act on a global scale.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Renowned expert Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi lays out a damning case against the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, declaring them a premeditated medical crime. He reveals that a Robert Koch Institute protocol signaled the intent to use the public as test subjects long before rollout. The core of his argument rests on three pillars: First, legitimate testing was impossible. BioNTech lacks experimental animal facilities, making proper safety and efficacy studies non-existent. Official documents admitted that "relevant data will only be raised post-marketing," meaning the public was the trial. Second, peer-reviewed science has now proven the vials are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This genetic material, packaged with the mRNA, is efficiently delivered into human cells, reprogramming them to produce the foreign Spike protein for days or even months. His conclusion is stark: this process constitutes genetic modification. The vaccinated have become genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Dr. Bhakdi does not mince words: this was not an error, but a deliberate, criminal act on a global scale.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nach seinem Verständnis war die Impfung absichtlich, Menschen als Versuchskaninchen zu verwenden. Protokoll vom 27 April 20 20: mehrere Impfstoffe im Schnellverfahren entwickelt und getestet. Die Tests seien nicht legartig; BioNTech habe keine Versuchstieranlage und habe Wirksamkeit sowie Sicherheit nicht geprüft. Danach kam heraus, dass Impfstoffchargen kontaminiert sind mit Bakterien-DNA. Das ist kriminell, ein Kapitalverbrechen. According to his understanding, the vaccination was intentional to use people as guinea pigs. Protocol from 27 April 20 20: several vaccines in a fast-track development and testing. The tests were not legal; BioNTech had no animal testing facility and did not test efficacy or safety. Afterwards it emerged that vaccine batches are contaminated with bacterial DNA. That is criminal, a capital crime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nach meinem Verständnis ist es jetzt klar, dass diese Impfung absichtlich war und zwar die Absicht war, die Menschen als Versuchskaninchen zu gebrauchen, nicht? Robert Koch, Protokoll vom 27 April 20 20, bevor überhaupt jemand was davon träumte, schreiben Sie, ja, es werden mehrere Impfstoffe kommen, die im Schnellverfahren entwickelt und getestet wurden, wurden. Deutsch ist eine tolle Sprache. Ja. Ja. Das heißt, es ist schon alles fertig. Und mir war klar, dass die Testung nicht legartig sein konnte, weil das ist das weiß ich ja BioNTech überhaupt keine Versuchstieranlage hat. Sie konnten gar keine Versuche machen, die Wirksamkeit zu testen und die Sicherheit sowieso nicht. Ja, also waren sie nicht richtig getestet und darunter steht relevante Daten werden erst Postmarketing erhoben. 7 Worte. Relevante Daten werden erst Postmarketing an Menschen erhoben. Sie hatten überhaupt keine Daten. Leute, so was macht man nicht, ja. Dann ist es rausgekommen, dass diese Impfstoffchargen kontaminiert sind mit Bakterien DNA. Es ist rausgekommen, die Publikation ist gerade erschienen vor 1 Woche. Die Publikation stammt aus dem Labor von MWGFD, ja? Und ist Peer reviewed in der wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift. Und da ist gezeigt, dass sowohl die RNA wie auch die DNA verpackt sind und geschützt sind und dass beide Pakete sofort von menschlichen Zellen aufgenommen werden. Ja, extrem effizient. Schon nach Stunden fangen die Zellen an, dieses fremde Protein zu machen, Spike. Und diese Spike Produktion hält über Tage an. Und die Aufnahme 1 funktionierenden, fremden Gens ist gleichzusetzen mit genetischer Modifikation der Zelle. Sprich, die Geimpften wurden zu genetisch modifizierten Organismen Über Tage, vielleicht Monate, das wissen wir nicht. Es gibt Hinweise, dass es über Monate geht, ja. Das ist kriminell. Das das ist ein Kapitalverbrechen.

@WavesImpact - Waves-Impact💫

🚨 Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Drops a Bombshell 🚨 Renowned scientist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi calls the COVID-19 mRNA rollout a “premeditated medical crime” a mass human experiment disguised as public health. 💥 Key Revelations: 1️⃣ No Real Testing – BioNTech had no animal labs. Official docs admitted “relevant data will only be raised post-marketing.” Translation: YOU were the trial. 2️⃣ Bacterial DNA Contamination – Peer-reviewed studies now confirm the vials carry foreign DNA, delivered into human cells with the mRNA, hijacking them to churn out spike proteins for days or months. 3️⃣ Genetic Modification – This isn’t just a shot. It’s a process that reprograms your cells. Bhakdi calls it what it is: turning humans into GMOs. 🔴 His Verdict: Not a mistake. A deliberate, global act.

P_McCulloughMD
Posted - January 14, 2026 at 11:52 AM
Saved - January 14, 2026 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn that mRNA research poses a cataclysmic awakening: dangerous pharmacokinetics, years-long persistence, no control of antigen production, frameshifted peptide products, cDNA contamination, direct cellular and genomic toxicity, teratogenicity, oncogenicity, and transgenerational spread from parents to children. I call it an unqualified bio-pharmaceutical disaster. Courtesy CHD, Austin TX Nov 7, 2025.

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

Scientifically Seduced, mRNA Research Community Will Face Cataclysmic Awaking Dangerous pharmacokinetics, persistence for years, no control over antigenic production, frameshifted peptide products, cDNA contamination, direct cellular and genomic toxicity, teratogenicity, oncogenicity, transgenerational spread from parents to children. mRNA is an unqualified bio-pharmaceutical disaster. Courtesy CHD, Austin TX Nov 7, 2025. @Docjohnc @neo7bioscience @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @NicHulscher @McCulloughFund @ChildrensHD @BrianHookerPhD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes unbridled enthusiasm and irrational exuberance for life as sacrificing safety. They state they presented autopsy work on death after COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, where thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists attended. As people visited, the speaker was stunned by what they call scientific seduction by messenger RNA technology. They predict a cataclysmic recognition that mRNA platforms are unsafe, claiming there is no way to break down pseudourrogenated messenger RNA. The speaker asserts that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna remains in patients’ bloodstream three years after the shots, described as intact.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we have unbridled enthusiasm, this irrational exuberance for anything in life, what is sacrificed is safety. It's safety. And and we presented our autopsy work on death after COVID nineteen vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology. Thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, immunologists were there. And as people came by and we talked to them, I was stunned with how they had been scientifically seduced with messenger RNA technology. So, there is going to be a cataclysmic recognition that this is an unsafe platform. There's no way to break down that I'm aware of pseudourogenated messenger RNA. We're working in research labs. We have circulating messenger RNA of Pfizer or Moderna in my patients in their bloodstream three years after the shots. Intact.
View Full Interactive Feed