reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - February 8, 2024 at 12:04 AM

Saved - February 8, 2024 at 5:43 AM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Reporter Discovers UN-Funded Camps Deep Inside US https://t.co/nnJ5Klgiw4

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video discusses the response to Tucker Carlson's interview with Vladimir Putin and the attack on American views. The speaker highlights the importance of journalism and the First Amendment in defending American values. They also discuss the situation at the Texas border and the illegal immigration issue. The speaker emphasizes the need to separate the sheep from the goats and confront those who aid and abet illegal operations. They warn about the rise of deception and the need to discern the truth based on biblical principles. The speaker concludes by discussing the invasion at the southern border and the collapse of American sovereignty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I want people to really pay attention to the response because the response of these people is what's really red pilling people. I think the response of how they're gonna react, putting Tucker on a kill list, okay, because he's a journalist and a reporter, interviewing some someone unauthorized. What does that mean for all of us? Listen. Listen. A journalist is not someone that went to school and has been appointed because they have some kind of a degree. A journalist is the first amendment. Okay? Like and and that's not to knock anybody that has gone to school, that has got a degree to do this. The point is this, is it's an attack on America. It's not an attack on Tucker. It's an attack on American views. And I don't know if that's Tucker's, intention. He kinda mentioned that in his video, but that's what people are gonna see. So on that east side, Alex, where they're coming straight through, it's about an hour and a half walk. I would estimate an hour at the least walk on foot through the hills in Jakumba where you walk through from this east side where there's no one stopping you, there's no border patrol, there's nobody there. And the illegals come through, and they walk about an hour, an hour and a half through the hills in Jakumba, and there's a little encampment off of the the the the Old Town 80, Highway in Jacumba. This is in San Diego County. So they walk about an hour and a half into the United States, and there's an encampment right off the freeway. Speaker 1: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visitinfowars.comforward/show and share the link today. Alright. Drew Hernandez Andes is back at his hotel in a safer zone. He said, listen. There's some stuff happening at the Texas border when he was there this week over the weekend. He said, wanna go to California. That's where I'm told the the the the the the crazy stuff is. And the footage he got by himself in the dark of night inside the illegal alien camps and the UN and and the smugglers and confronting remember me and Drew went and confronted smugglers and stopped the car and all that in South Texas, well, he did it again, and almost would tell him, man, dude, be you know, be safe because it's dangerous. And the things they were saying, the arrogance. So you got a lot of footage and those not even out yet. You've already put out so much. Drew, crazy. I wanna talk about the border, What you've witnessed, what Biden's trying to do right now spinning this. But before we go there, Tucker Carlson, the Putin interview, the open attempts at censorship, where America is, how would you describe the world today? Speaker 0: Well, I think right now the world is exactly where Jesus said it would be, with lawlessness abounding and the rise of deception, which is right now in the 21st century, you're gonna see that unfolding, within the media predominantly, and this is why it's so important, to become a part of the counternarrative, as we put forth the truth. And I think Tucker Carlson is trailblazing. I was when I saw what he was doing, I was crazy. And the response, I think they're really gonna Assange Tucker. I I think I think they really are gonna move, maybe Snowden him as well. But, you know, this is what's necessary. This is what's absolutely necessary right now. These these peaceful actions, these peaceful moves that are made by simply just doing acts of journalism, reporting, and interviews with Speaker 1: Exactly. What are they so scared of exactly? Folks, remember, it's free speech. It's an interview. How do we get to this? Speaker 0: We got to this because we've allowed it, and we've got to this point now where they are showing their true colors. And I think that's part of the move, and that's what people are gonna see because they've attempted really aggressively to villainize, Vladimir Putin, Russia, whatever your views may be on Putin and Russia, that's your own personal viewpoint, but you got it. You still can't avoid the fact that everything and anybody that they disagree with is a Russian agent. Even when Nancy Pelosi gets confronted in San Francisco by these pro Hamas protesters, what is her what is her regurgitated NPC automatic response, Russian agents, Russian agents, Russian agents. Speaker 1: The EU is trying to ban all the farmer protests as they turn their fuel and fertilizer off Saying they work for Putin. No. You're destroying their livelihood. They're fighting for their lives. Putin has nothing to do with it. Speaker 0: Absolutely, and the narrative is crumbling. That's the point I'm trying to make here. This this this whole fabricated narrative where everything's a Russian agent, I mean, it crumbled and it fell apart post 2016 election where they tried to claim that it was a Russian interference and Donald j Trump. He colluded with Speaker 1: the Russians. Russians are like Are like leprechauns that have magical powers. Speaker 0: When in reality, it's them. They're the ones committing election interference. They're the ones. It's the it's the it's the weaponized FBI working alongside Twitter 1 point o to shut down the Hunter Biden laptop story. They are the ones in their globalist corruption, they are the ones with their tyranny. They are the ones that are suppressing American constitutional free, god given, inalienable rights. See, but this is this is what's important right now, and and I just wanna say this. I don't wanna switch the subject off the border, but we're talking about Tucker. I want people to really pay attention to the response because the response of these people is what's really red pilling people. I think the response of how they're gonna react, putting Tucker on a kill list, okay, because he's a journalist and a reporter interviewing some someone unauthorized. What does that mean for all of us? Listen. Listen. A journalist is not someone that went to school and has been appointed because they have some kind of a degree. A journalist is the first amendment. Okay? Like and and that's not to knock anybody that has gone to school, that has got a degree to do this. The point is this, is it's an attack on America. It's not an attack on Tucker. It's an attack on American views. And I don't know if that's Tucker's, intention. He kinda mentioned that in his video, but that's what people are gonna see. So you gotta pay really close attention to the response Speaker 1: of these people. Agree. And it's blowing up in their face. The little video he put out yesterday has 85,000,000 views. That's the thing. Don't they they would just shut up. It wouldn't have been a big deal. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And people are waking up to the reality that their rights are being violated. And especially with this border stuff, Alex. I mean, for all the info warriors out there, I make it a point all the time. Whenever I'm on the ground, I go report on something, it's totally breaching the matrix. I make it a point to send it to my family. I'll send this stuff to my mom. I'll I'll I'll send this to all my liberal family members, and I'm like, this is what's going on. How do you feel about this? And those those little those little, you know, transmission sending to your family members, that really does a lot because I'm getting a lot of people, especially Californians, they're like, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Let let me ask you something. Hold on. They're like, that's that's that's is not in Mexico. Right? I'm like, no. That's an hour south of San Diego. And you have these military age male encampments, alright, by the 100 in your own damn backyard Speaker 1: Exactly. Start over and describe what you found. This is insane. Speaker 0: Yeah. So before we get into this guy, I had a little, you know, this fussy little Mexican guy. Before we got into it with him, we show up to Jacumba in Southern California and for those of you unfamiliar with the area, this is why I really wanted to shine a spotlight on this because I believe it's getting under, reported. There are several on the ground reporters, border journalists down there. Speaker 1: There's plenty of reporting at Eagle Pass. There's plenty of reporting at Gary and Gab. It's all the other places they don't want us to look. Speaker 0: Absolutely. So while we were in e Eagle Pass, the Infowars team that was there before me did a great phenomenal job, but things slowed down. And we had conversations with our Infowars border patrol, source within and I you know, we had a full conversation. I said, where do you where do you think would be the spot right now? Should we stay here in Eagle Pass? Abbott's gonna come tomorrow. Give his little photo op speech, or should we go somewhere else? And they told me straight up, I think you would be better off going to Jacumba, California because it's popping there right now, and these people are coming straight over. So the photo op in Texas, yes, things have slowed down. There are little pockets here and there at Eagle Pass, other sectors in Texas, but it seems like they're rerouting. Southern Arizona's Sabi has been getting flooded overnight with illegals and obviously, Jacumba, California. So we rerouted and, we went down. And this whole section, there's, in Jakumba, there's this like I said, it's about an hour south, from SeaWorld in San Diego, just to give you San Diegans out there in Southern California is how close this is. And there's a west side and an east side on the border wall. On the west side, the only thing stopping the illegals from getting in is literally just barbed wire and they go around the gate and they come straight in the United States. There's an encampment right there, and they turn themselves into border patrol just like we've been seeing across the US. And then there's another section on the east side on this, border wall in Chukumba, California where there is no one there, the barbed wire is all trampled on, and people could just walk directly through. And here's what's interesting about this, and this brings me to this this fussy little Mexican guy that I debated. So on that east side, Alex, where they're coming straight through. It's about an hour and a half walk. I would estimate an hour at the least walk on foot through the hills in Jakumba where you walk through from this east side where there's no one stopping you, there's no border patrol, there's nobody there. And the illegals come through, and they walk about an hour, an hour and a half through the hills in Jakumba, and there's a little encampment off of the the the the the Old Town 80, Highway in Jacumba. This is in San Diego County. So they walk about an hour and a half into the United States, and there's an encampment right off the freeway. And this is where I confronted these fake Christian humanitarians where they show up and they're giving them supplies and they're claiming to be Christians. And that's what pissed me off. You know? Like, if if You Speaker 1: know what? It's just being a mother getting paid by the UN. What you get is the the bait for all these people. Speaker 0: Yes, we we know that these are NGOs, but that's why I was really pressing them to get a confirmation on camera. You know how it works, Alex, but we can assume because that's the majority that, we have seen, but they just claim to be Christians. They claim to be doing the word of God. And that's what really pissed me off the most because I'm like, okay. Now we're gonna have a conversation. So you can't sit here and I think this is part of what needs to happen, Alex. Right now in 2024, we really do need to separate the sheep from the goats. Like, we should have a zero tolerance policy for anybody, that is showing any signs of anti American rhetoric or actions or views. I don't care what color you are. I don't care where Speaker 1: you stand from. Even hate the victims they're bringing in. Instead, it's being organized to bring the country down. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And so that's why I confronted these guys. It's like you're gonna sit here and tell me, oh, we're doing the work of God. You point up. So I confronted them because we we need to separate this. Right? Because this has happened to us. Right, Alex? This is part of the op that they're running with these NGOs and these humanitarian groups. The last I think it was 2021 where we went down and we confronted the human traffickers in the middle of the street in broad daylight, what was the response of the mainstream local media? The response was Alex Jones, Infowars, Drew Hernandez, attack a Catholic charity, nongovernment organization, a humanitarian effort, and try to really, you know, victimized the situation and not only the illegals, but they try to victimize the NGOs themselves. They try to spin it on you like you're the one that is anti Christian when when they're anti Christ. This whole operation is lawless, and it's anti Christ. See, this is this is why I'm telling people, have these type of peaceful confrontations. You don't have to get aggressive. You don't have to get violent. All you gotta do is walk up and ask them, especially if they claim to be Christians, okay, what is your justification to you aiding and abetting this illegal operation here in my country, in the United to you because there's an illegal operation taking place right before my very eyes, and I'm watching you do it. I need an answer from you. Why are you doing this? How are you doing this? And they you wanna know, Alex? You wanna know why these so called Christian Catholic NGOs, they can't provide an answer to justify aiding and abetting human trafficking operations, encouraging and incentivizing more illegal immigration for these people to come here, because there isn't an answer, Alex. There is no answer to this. There is no answer in the bible. There is no answer in the scriptures because Jesus Christ does not encourage lawlessness. Speaker 1: Let's be clear. Simple. They're bringing we caught new footage. I gotta send my board patrol of little kids they'd already seen before, and they and they start crying. The kids are begging us. Take us away. Help us. And the and the border patrol's ordered to hand them over to an NGO and let them disappear again to see them a month later. And that's what's really getting to the border patrol is they keep seeing the kids being used Over and over again. Speaker 0: Because they're nothing but commodities. That's what people need to understand. Speaker 1: Yeah. This is the slave traffic, folks. This is modern slavery. We go, oh, they're They're here for a better life. No. They're being used. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And, you know, and and, you know, just to push back on the SJWs because they say, oh, well, we need, 1,000,000,000 of dollars in reparations for all the black people in the United States of America because they're victims of slavery, and we need to make sure that we, you know, we wash the sins away of America in the past by making sure that we we we we we we we we make it very clear that we are anti slavery here in the United States of America but they don't wanna talk about this, Alex. You're not allowed to talk about the children that are being recycled. Recycled. Alright, they're being recycled. They get pushed through the southern border, human trafficked. They're here by the cartels in the United States. They send them back, and then they rotate them over Speaker 1: and over and over and over and over. And you wanna know, the border patrol and Speaker 0: the Texas DPS, these guys, man, they they they it's it it is really hard to have to deal with this. It is really hard to have Speaker 1: very depressed. Put in a position. They're pissed. Speaker 0: They're sick of it. They're sick of it. They're pissed, and that's why I think it was a great and I had a conversation with this border patrol agent in Eagle Pass, and he he wanted he wanted me to make it very clear that, you know, everyone's talking about civil war and this, you know, this conflict between Texas DPS and border patrol because the feds are gonna have some mass conflict down there. And, he made it very clear. He said, you know what, Drew? We're all unified. We're sick of this. We don't want this anymore. We hate what Biden is doing. We don't wanna fight each other. It's alright, sir. I'll communicate that because I I I think people need to know Speaker 1: that That's all lies put up with the media. And and and again, people say, oh, well, quit your job. Then if they quit, they'll even put pure NGOs in who'll rape the kids right there on scene. It's it's just it's very hard to deal with. Speaker 0: And, Alex, unfortunately, I think that's part of the operation. I mean, that's what defund the police was. Correct? It's a regime installation. Get rid of all the good guys. Alright? Get rid of anyone that has a conscience. Okay, put them in a position where they have to choose between defending their country or betraying their country. And anyone with a good conscience is gonna they're they're gonna tap out. They're gonna retire. They're not gonna wanna deal with it. They're gonna walk away, or they'll astound their ground, and they'll they'll become a whistleblower. We've we've we've seen this over and over and over again, but part of that operation is a regime installation. It's to replace good men and women that have a heart and a conscience that don't wanna deal with this anymore, so they're pushed out. And the same thing is happening with the border patrol. The same thing is happening. Anything that the feds could hijack in terms of law enforcement. Yeah. They Speaker 1: poison shots and the transgender and the critical race theory. They're like, oh, we have a record low recruitment. That's what they want. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And and and I kinda noticed this in Jacumba as well because anytime we go down there, Alex, these guys love us, man. You know? Especially when they know who you are and they know, you know, what your intent is is to expose to this insane illegal invasion, I mean, there's no legal invasion, but it's just this illegal human trafficking operation. Anytime you go down to Texas or you go down to Arizona, and I have start to have conversations with these border patrol agents whether whether it's on camera or off camera off record. They're always talking, especially when they, you know, they Google you and, like, okay. I I feel safe talking to this guy because I know he's not some fake news, you know, cuck trying to spin everything, like everything's okay. They're always willing to talk. And what I found interesting in California, because it's California, these border patrol agents did not wanna talk. They would not they did not wanna have conversations. They just kept giving us this you could tell it was like this rehearsed response. Oh, the illegals are are the the they're they're they're they're they're coming in from everywhere. We heard this multiple times. And then we also had a conversation with 1, and he said, oh, I'm sorry. I can't I can't talk to you guys. I I love what you guys are doing, but, you know, I gotta redirect you to, you know, the media comms for the border patrol representative and you know, no no no no no knock on them. Just it's something to note. Because this whole area, you they got drones in the sky on the US side. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. No. It's the policy drawing them here, then they make the agency become the facilitator And, like, the nannies for all of this, and then they sign all these men and women and children up with NGOs who skim money off of it. It's a giant money making operation. It's not just about votes. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And and let me let me go back to this this, this little Mexican guy that I debated. I want America to really pay attention to what was said there. Alright? Because you got you got info wars on the ground. Speaker 1: We played it earlier, and we posted some post. We'll put the full 10 minute debate up. But what happened Speaker 0: with this guy? I I just wanna comment on his on on on the statement he made. And America needs to take this serious. It doesn't matter what your politics are. It doesn't matter if you identify as a democrat or republican, a left winger or a right winger does not matter. This guy would not identify his citizenship. Okay, and I made mine very clear as an American. I'm proud to be American, dude. You wanna know my citizenship? Here you go. Didn't have an answer. And what does he say? He says, you think this is your country? He says, f America. This is a Mexican territory. I want I want I want people at home to really let that resonate. Okay? Because how far does that really go? It goes farther beyond and, Alex, you know this. This goes way beyond what what we're seeing right now. Okay? Right now, we are watching the facilitation. We are watching the importation of this replacement migration illegal human trafficking. Speaker 1: Plan to break the United States up along ethnic lines. Speaker 0: And wait until they activate these people. These people are filled with hatred. They hate Americans. They hate you. They know they're here to replace you. And guys like this, they know exactly what they're doing and why they're doing it. But at the same time, let me let me let me make another observation as well, Alex. So this guy is obviously, you know, is Mexican Allegiant that thinks that, you know, the state of California is a Mexican territory. It's US soil. What a crazy statement to make. But it's interesting because the majority of the illegals coming in are not Mexicans. They're coming from China. They're coming from Guatemala, Honduras. They're coming from Ecuador, they're coming from Colombia, Venezuela, from Afghanistan, Iraq. They're coming from the Middle East. They're coming from Ukraine. They're coming from Russia. A lot of military aged men specifically in this location. This is why I really wanted to put a flashlight on this, Alex, because people can be California needs to see this, man. And and and and the the the the point I wanna make is this guy thinks that he, okay, as a Mexican, is reclaiming to can territory by importing all of these 4 nationals from all over the world into the United States. Even these n p c these these UN globalist and Speaker 1: He's conquering America for the he's conquering America for the globalist. Speaker 0: Exactly. And he probably doesn't even realize that. You see what I'm saying, Alex? Because these people are just being weaponized by Satan to facilitate this evil agenda that is collapsing sovereignty of nations, which god has given us sovereignty. This is clear in the book of Acts that god has drawn border lines. He's given sovereign nations their own sovereignty. This is this even serves, purposes for eschatology in the end times. There are nations. There are borderlines. Groups. Speaker 1: God destroyed the tower of Babel. He doesn't want unity. He wants choices. He wants clear delineated lines. Speaker 0: He doesn't want satanic unity. Alright? Because people No. Exactly. Speaker 1: That's what I meant. He knows Satan's trying to create a human. Speaker 0: I'm not I I'm not correcting you. Speaker 1: You're the pastor. Explain it to me. I just I get the layman term. Speaker 0: It's okay. It's just I think this is where people get it twisted out. Speaker 1: God wants unity under God, but not under Satan. Explain that. Speaker 0: Exactly. This is where people get and and I I would even say this is where maybe bible believing Christians might even kinda get, you know, cornered and put Speaker 1: into a story. About the Power Bable, why did God not want that? Exactly. Speaker 0: Unity is not bad. You see that in the church. Born again Christians, we are the church, we are the born again. Jesus prayed this in John chapter 17. Correct? Like, I pray that they would be unified. I pray that they'd be together. But that's unified around what? It's the ideology and unified around who? God. Because the word unity could get you into a place, and that's what the anti the Christ system is in the end times. It's this global satanic antichrist unity that is everything in opposition attempting to usurp the authority of Jesus Christ, and prop themselves up as savior as messiah. It's a false unity. And people need to be very careful. And I and and and listen, I I can't speak on the hearts of some of these self proclaimed Christians or Catholics that are getting involved with these NGO operations. I don't know what the percentage would be of people that might actually be deceived thinking they're actually doing the right thing, but this is why we need to wake those sector of people up as well. Speaker 1: So because research as your pastor too, and I I I I really respect you. Christ unity that comes when Christ returns Versus the Bible saying we have nations and peoples and God destroyed the tower of Babel. He didn't want that unity. Speaker 0: Yeah, it's very simple because the tower of Babel, that was a satanic operation. Alright? Because the heartbeat of Lucifer. Right, why was Lucifer cast out of heaven? Because his heart was lifted up in pride. He wanted to be God. He wanted to rise above the heavens, above the throne of God. He wanted god's position. Okay? So that is the heartbeat of Lucifer. And you see this throughout the old testament and the new testament where civilization attempts to do the same exact thing. They erect the table of bow the Tower of Babel. They wanna ascend into the heavens. They want to ascend above God, and it's a global unity without God. It's a global unity that is humanitarian within humanity that is backed spiritually by Satan, but it's void of Christ. It's void of the Bible. It's void of the word of God. That's why nothing these people do and nothing they say to an extent lines up with the Bible. This is why the Bible is the filter. I don't care what anybody has to say. They say it in the name of God, they say it in the name of Christ, if it does not line up with the Bible, reject it. That's your filter. That's your survival. That's your discernment. To the difference between the satanic unity that you see, it's the spirit of the antichrist that shows up in the end times, that is this global, unified, humanitarian, kumbaya, everyone looks the same, everyone sounds the same, even the military is unified, the global economy is unified, politics, it's a global death cult in the end. But what are they unified around? Not Jesus Christ. Speaker 1: It's whatever the mark of the beast tells you to do. You have to worship the beast. You don't just get the mark and buy and sell. You have to follow the beast, worship it, which is the social credit score. Speaker 0: Absolutely. The mark of the beast is not only a piece of technology or a mark of the culture to receive at that time in order to participate in the economy at that time, that that's just part of it. The mark of the beast at the time is an allegiance. Your proclamation that the antichrist is God himself in the flesh. If you accept that, that's what you are proclaiming. You take that mark, but you reject that, you're gonna get killed for it. Why? Because you're rejecting him as god. Serious stuff, guys. Speaker 1: Let's do 5 more minutes, and then our guest host takes over. Drew Hernandez on fire as usual. Two words, nitric boost. Ladies and gentlemen, This product without us even promoting it has become one of our top 3 because people get it and it blows them away. The health, The energy, the immune system, the bedroom department, what it does with the alone, not to mention the immune system, exercise performance, you name it. It's incredible, and the product is now back stock@infowarsstore.com for 40% off. Secure your bottle now of nitric boost at infowarsstore dotcom, and it funds the M4, which is an added bonus. Nitric boost. Nitric boost. 40% off, in stock, ready to ship. Infowarsstore.com, nitric boost. Thank you all for your support, and you need this product. You can see the satanism out in the open. It is good versus evil. I've been trying to shoot a report for weeks. I'm gonna try to shoot it today or tomorrow. So much is happening. I've I've done months of research on just all the open satanism on TV, kids shows, movies. May I mean, they're saying Satan's good, God is bad, and they're they're bringing out so the time we have left, Drew, you've done a great job down there on the border. I know you got more coming. Finish up your breakdown because you're dead on that Satan is a counterfeit of God. He has a false unity, which looks good because we're designed by God to want unity, but it's not God's unity. It's a destructive unity. Speaker 0: And and I think that's the problem with a lot of, you know, self proclaimed Christians because they don't have, a biblical foundation. It's it's quite literally that simple. Because how can you discern and identify what you're really unified around? Am I unified around some kind of satanically, demonically empowered movement, am I empowered, excuse me, am I unified around some kind of, holy spirit, a biblically empowered movement by God? And the only way you're gonna be able to tell is if the actions displayed before you, the fruits. It's what Christ said. And part of the story Speaker 1: is it isn't just we do. The enemy comes after you when you're going against Speaker 0: them. Absolutely. You could see the byproduct and persecution, definitely. People are gonna come after you, for taking a stance, not only for truth, but the truth. You really wanna see some levels of persecution. Start start really standing for Christ pretty much anywhere, publicly, wherever you are, and you've seen these levels of that, Alex, especially with inforce, and they've literally come after you for standing against an end time scenario, the new world order and the globalist machine. But I think people need to be really careful because the Bible has made this very clear that in the last days, you're gonna see a total rise in deception, false messiahs, false christs, false prophets. These levels of sophisticated deception, are gonna continue to rise, in the media, in the culture, in politics, in government. All of these influential institutions, not only in the United States, but worldwide, globally, especially with the collapse of the southern border of the United States of America. And I think a lot, because I've had conversations with so called Christians. I'm like, yeah. But, you know, the Bible does say we gotta take care of the foreigner. The Bible does say that we should love our enemy as ourselves. Love your neighbor as yourself. But then I push back and I say, well, what does that really mean? Like, what what if you're dealing with an operation that is totally, 100% satanically charged. Speaker 1: The UN cut off their food for 3 years. They are victims, but now they're used as a weapon. It's part of a UN plan. Wow. Speaker 0: They've been weaponized, and they're being weaponized at the same time. Just wait till these people get activated, Alex. You you know. You know. I don't have to tell you. Just wait till these people get activated like they've been activated in France and Germany and in Europe. Then then the That's why you're gonna wake up. Speaker 1: Ahead of us. They bring them in, then they politically activate Speaker 0: them. Yeah. How's the church doing there? You know? Speaker 1: It's just They burned 58,000 churches in France alone the last few years. Speaker 0: Exactly. And because once they get activated, that's when people wake up to the reality of what's going on here. It's not that's why I don't like using the term border crisis, Alex. I I don't like it. It it sounds like Speaker 1: No. It's it's it's the end of America crisis. It's the UN invasion. Speaker 0: But it you the term crisis just sounds like it's some it sounds like a like a hurricane's coming through. And we and that's the more you control. Speaker 1: What should we call it? Speaker 0: It's an invasion. It's a collapse of American sovereignty. That's what it is. It's a total invasion, like you said, UN backed, globalist backed. Because to imply it's a crisis means that, like, we don't have control. This is strategic, Alex. You know this. All of this is preplanned, strategic US government working with cartels and foreign globalist entities and NGOs, 501c3, c4s, they get these FEMA grants, they get all of these government grants that are all coming in, importing to these NGOs to facilitate these people coming into our country, it's lawless. As a Christian, you can't sit here and say, well, I support that, and I wanna participate, you know, to help these people. No. These people are being used. Alright? And a lot of them I'm telling you, you talk to border patrol, they're like, the the majority of these people are not family. Speaker 1: Doesn't the Bible tell us where Satan is or there's anarchy? Speaker 0: Lawlessness. Total anarchy and lawlessness. And right now, what we are watching is this mass operation. Anarchy, lawlessness. We serve a god of order. Bible says the god that we serve, Jesus Christ, is a god of order. And right now, we don't have that, especially Speaker 1: the great reports you're posting? Speaker 0: You guys can follow me on x@drewhlive, but make sure to support band dot video infowarsstore.com so we can continue to do some on the ground reporting, here, we think Speaker 1: Be safe, Drew. Great job. We love you. Speaker 2: Well, well, nitric oxide is a key. It's made by our own bodies again. It's made by l citrulline and and L arginine, the amino acids. So we're fed. You can you can get it from beet powder and other things. The nitric oxide relaxes Sis, the endothelium, the vasculature, it relaxes the vein. It's a natural blood pressure. In fact, I use the 2, your InfoWars. I keep that on my shell, and I feed myself the cardiomiracle, which is just for straight food. It's a different formulation than that one. And the 2 together are a 1 two punch. So you get in your food the ability to make what you need and no more. Speaker 1: That was doctor Judy Mikovitz, top research scientist, without me even asking her, telling everybody how incredible this product is, and it's finally back in stock. Nitric boost is 40% off at infowarsstore.com, and it doesn't just have the vasodilation opening up your arteries and your veins to clean things It does so many incredible things. God gave us this compound. So many of the big things you see out there promoting the media are based on the natural ingredients that are already in this product. So get your amazing nitric boost today at infowars store Tom, you need to experience the health, the vitality, the stamina, the libido, everything comes with nitric boost. You've looked at our formula. You you like it? Speaker 2: I did, and I do. Yes. Speaker 1: Well, I I'm not a scientist like you. What is what do these compounds do creating nitrous oxide? What does it do? Speaker 2: It relaxes the vasculature. So the clot will go through and not restrict. It allows to relax. It lowers the blood pressure, has the, toxic, synthetic lipid nanoparticles similar to the one In the COVID shot. Prior to the COVID shot, the deadliest vaccine, we saw athletes dropping dead on the field, passing out, calling down all the things we're Speaker 1: seeing is it particularly the athletes? Speaker 2: Because they operate at oxygen max, capacity max. They're they're operating at Such a high level in their mitochondria. This is an energy production oxygen, necessary disease. Speaker 0: So they create they that's Speaker 1: what they're finding. They turbocharge of blood clots. Speaker 2: Yep. And ischemia, lack of oxygen. So constricted blood vessels too because athletes are running. They're constricted. They're they're working so that the blood flows and it doesn't flow, which is why your nitric oxide, product, that new products, I hope you'll show it because That's a very important thing to have for acute events. The it dissolve under the tongue, give you an instant relaxing of your endothelium, your vasculature. Speaker 1: Nitric boost, exclusively available. 40% off right now in stock, ready to ship. Nitric boost, infowarsstore.com. Try it. Support the Infowar. It's a 3 60 win.

@redpillb0t — redpillbot

Posted - April 8, 2024 at 1:53 AM

Saved - April 8, 2024 at 3:12 AM

@redpillb0t - redpillbot

2017 Alex Jones rant was right https://t.co/AKAGlWgXNl

Video Transcript AI Summary

Alex Jones and Joe Rogan discuss various topics including aliens, vampires, AI, and the elite's plans for a breakaway civilization. Jones talks about Google's AI plans and the potential dangers of a hive mind connected to billions of people. He warns of a future where AI controls humanity's thoughts and decisions, leading to the end of free will. Jones also mentions a human counter strike to stop this AI takeover and prevent the destruction of humanity. The conversation touches on pedophiles, psychic vampires, and interdimensional entities influencing those in power.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Tell us if you love them or you hate them. 22 years on podcast, Infowars, Alex Jones, and Joe Rogan. Discuss what's currently happening right now. Google, CERN, technology, vampire, aliens. In a nutshell, Alex was pretty on point with this message. Let me know what your thoughts are. Is he crazy or is he on to something? Speaker 1: It's really big. So Okay. Yeah. For another shot of that. Maybe get this out properly. Out. Alright. Let me give you my best, please. Keep research information. What do Speaker 2: you think is going but am I, wrong to just still hold out hope that aliens are real? Because I tell you, as one, the 2 guilty pleasures that I still cling to is Bigfoot and aliens. Those are 2. Bigfoot, not so much. I wish it was real, but I just don't Are you ready? Yes. Bigfoot's real? No. Come on, daddy. Speaker 1: No. Are you ready? Yes. I'm gonna give you the big enchilada. Joe, there are aliens in this room right now. Speaker 0: For real? Speaker 1: Yeah. You're not in this world, bro. Me? Speaker 2: You're the alien. Oh, wow. I didn't know. Well, here's Speaker 1: what the elite believe, and let me be very clear. This media will take this out of context. I only go with what I can prove. Oh, thank you. And and people can't even handle that. There's armies. We're fighting a pedophile conspiracy. But beyond that, it's a vampire conspiracy and that they are inter dimensionally sucking the essence of our youth. Right. And they believe they're possessed by an off world entity. They do. Yeah. And then, Joe, I've been on air 22 years. I don't get into aliens, metaphysical, religion, any of that. I've studied daily, and I've also communicated with a lot of the top people. And then and if you wanna know, I will actually break down right now the best knowledge right now what's happening on the planet. What's happening? The elite are all about transcendence and living forever and the secrets Powerful, consciousnesses don't wanna dominate other people. They wanna empower them so they don't tend to get together until things are really late in the game, then they come together. Evil is always defeated because good is so much stronger. And we're on this planet, and Einstein's physics showed it, Max Planck's physics showed it all. There's at least 12 dimensions. And now that's why all the top scientists and billionaires are coming out saying, it's a false hologram. It is artificial. The computers are scanning it and finding tension points where it's artificially projected and gravity is bleeding in to this universe. That's what they call dark matter. So we're like a thought or a dream that's a wisp in some computer programs, some god's mind, whatever. They're proving it all. It's all coming out. Now there's, like, this sub transmission zone below the 3rd dimension that's just turned over to the most horrible things is what it resonates to. And it's trying to get up into the 3rd dimension. That's just a basic level consciousness to launch into the next levels. And our species is already way up at the 5th, 6th dimension consciously our best people. But there's this big war trying to, like, basically destroy humanity because humanity has free will and there's a decision to which level we wanna go to. We have free will, so evil's allowed to come and contend, not just good. And the elites themselves believe they're racing using human technology to try to take our best minds and build some type of breakaway civilization where they're gonna merge with machines, transcend, and break away from the failed species of this man, which is kinda like a false transmission because they're thinking what they are is ugly and bad, projecting it onto themselves instead of believing, no. It's a human test about building us up. And so Google was set up 18, 19 years ago. This was I knew about this before it was declassified. I'm just saying I have good sources. That they wanted to build a giant artificial system, and Google believes that the first artificial intelligence will be a supercomputer based on the neuron activities of the hive mind of humanity with billions of people wired into it, what the Internet is saying is. And so all of our thoughts go into it, and we're actually building a computer that has real neurons in real time that's also psychically connected to us that are organic creatures so that they will have current prediction powers, future prediction powers, a true crystal ball. But the big secret is once you have a crystal ball and know the future, you can add stimuli beforehand and make decisions that control the future. And so then it's the end of consciousness and free will for individuals as we know And a true 2.0 in a very bad way, high of mind consciousness with an AI jacked into everyone knowing our hopes and dreams, delivering it to us, not in some PKD wire head system where we plug in and give up on consciousness because of unlimited pleasure, but because we were already wired in and absorbed before we knew it by giving over our consciousness to the system by our daily decisions that it was able to manipulate and control into a larger system. There's now a human counter strike taking place to shut this off before it gets fully into place and to block these systems and to try to have an actual debate about where humanity goes and cut off the pedophiles and psychic vampires that are control of this AI system before humanity is destroyed. With AI? How How do they Speaker 2: get how do the pedophiles get in control Speaker 1: of AI? The the pedophiles at a at a whatever level. Rule. The devil, whatever you wanna call it, this interdimensional thing that gives them advanced off world technology, the fallen one, the son of this world, is giving them advanced knowledge. What are you talking about? What is it? Systems that have already been used before on other populations. What? Is that Satan? But what are you what are you talking about? That's Satan.

@iluminatibot — illuminatibot

Posted - May 25, 2024 at 2:52 AM

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 3:17 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Alex Jones being based and redpilled https://t.co/ZEzkRgWyZZ

Video Transcript AI Summary

This is about society destroying normality and basic human biology. People in demon outfits are pushing inclusivity, even around children. Men in goblin demon costumes are getting too close to kids, which no species would allow. This needs to stop now.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: All this is is a societal wrecking ball to destroy any semblance of normality, any semblance of basic human biology that you see in the bees and you see in the birds. Imagine if somebody in a demon outfit showed up next to a baby, baby giraffe and said, hi. I'm a demon. Be inclusive. Don't be mean to me. Let me wear demon horns and come up and look like a complete alien from another planet. Let a space alien and by the way, this is a program. They dress up like space aliens all over the United States and all over the world. I told you. In horrible demon psychopath outfits that make Pennywise look beautiful. And they show up, and they have their way with your children in demon outfits. I mean, if you've got men that look like 400 pound goblin demons with your children, there's nothing you all put up with. There isn't Speaker 1: a species on the planet that would let something that looks like a space alien get up close to its kids, but only in America does it happen. And I'm sick of it. I'm tired of it right now. I had to handle it more.

@RealAlexJones — Alex Jones

Posted - June 2, 2024 at 9:03 PM

Saved - June 2, 2024 at 10:49 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

InfoWars Lockdown Update With Alex Jones https://t.co/9NMJFX4yz8

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker urges against violence and civil unrest, stating that the globalists want a civil war in America. He believes they may provoke violence themselves to play the victim. He emphasizes that violence is not the answer and encourages people to support Trump and promote American values. The speaker discusses his ongoing legal battle and accuses the chief reorganization officer of trying to set him up. He expresses concern about the future of Infowars and encourages listeners to support his sponsor, Doctor Jones Naturals. The speaker concludes by thanking his supporters and reminding them to follow him on Real Alex Jones on X.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, the most important thing to understand about what's happening in America and the world today is don't get violent. Don't have civil unrest that they'll call a civil war. Klaus Schwab and the globalist have said their plan is civil wars around the world or color revolutions that stabilize and destroy a country, and then the globalist come in as the saviors. That's being done. They want a civil war in America. They've been preprogramming it everywhere. We do not want that. So I don't want any violence against any of the people that are shutting down Infowars. I don't wanna hear any talk about it. I don't want to to to see any of it. I'm sure they'll provocateur some of these groups themselves and anonymously, you know, make threats against themselves to be victims. That's coming for sure. And for all people say, you know, violence is good. Our enemies want violence because they're losing the information war. They're hoping for violence. Do you understand if you study warfare in the modern system? Violence is not the answer. So we're the victims, and I'm about to lay out what's happened. We're the ones being attacked. We're the ones being silenced. And so people ask how they can support us. I'm about to break it all down for you. Pray for Infowars, share the articles, share the videos, share them from all the places you find, share them from Real Alex shows on x, and just understand that we're being targeted clearly. It's overwhelmingly clear to me by the deep state, and it's very, very serious. So there's a lot of stuff that I can't talk about at this time for a lot of strategic reasons and other things that I'm trying to work with my lawyers and stuff. They've got some points that are right. I'm right some of the time. And when it comes to I'm right most of the time. But but the point is is that this is a very, very serious time in America, and we're winning the culture war. We gotta be cool and focused like Trump. Gotta pray for Trump. We gotta support Trump because this is a criminal takeover we're witnessing. They're the ones saying, if Trump gets in, he's gonna prosecute them. Everything they say he's gonna do, they're doing it at a rampaging speed. So do not be violent. Do not make threats. Do not do any of that. Expose these people, mock them, laugh at them, and then promote good Christian Americana values. And just celebrate the fact that we're gonna win, and we're gonna beat these people, and we're not gonna let them trick us into a physical confrontation. Do you understand that false flags are coming? And I don't want them to use the incredible uproar, and, I'm very proud of folks. It's very touching to see just people comp I've never seen such a freak out. I mean I mean, this is like for me, it's the biggest freak out folks ever had for us. We've been through a lot. I appreciate the support. People see this as attack on them. But, I mean, this is mega viral. People are absolutely concerned because they see the climate everywhere and they see what's happening. So we're gonna win this. I'm willing to be Christ like, and just let them try to set me up. Let them try to put me in prison. Let them kill me. Whatever it is, it would be way more powerful. And I'm not saying I hope this happens. I hope it doesn't. If if if there was TVs around, I mean, cameras around. I don't want I want the world to see it. If some global has walked up, and and we could prove what's the global's doing and said, you know, you're dead. I mean, I would I would probably I didn't defend myself because I would know that'd be so powerful. So let me explain. This is an Obi Wan Kenobi moment. We're not gonna have to do that, folks. The point is is that if you wanna avert total hell on earth, we have got to be cool cucumbers, not just in this case, but everything as the temperature gets turned up towards this election, the most election the most important election in world history. So I'm exhausted. I'm a sit on the couch here for 2 nights, but I'm gonna be on there today at 4 PM CST again. Now I'm gonna do kind of a meandering breakdown. There's so much to say, so much to talk about, and and then I'll get into it more and strategy and things once I'm on the year at 4 PM CST. Thank you. God bless. Bless. And for breaking news and updates, be sure and follow me at real Alex Jones here on x. Ladies and gentlemen, Alex Jones here with a big update on the situation at Infowars. And I'll recap, and then I'll give you the latest information, but a lot of people, because I did 7 hours on this yesterday, haven't fully watched a few of the hours. They don't have the whole picture, you know, concise, and it can be a little confusing for some people, because there's so many moving parts and things happening. But here's the long and short of it. I learned Friday afternoon that they were calling in more guards. And then I made phone calls and found out that the CRO, that's the chief reorganization officer that's appointed by the federal court bankruptcy, Patrick McGill, was giving orders to send in more guards at night after they think we're all gone at 9 o'clock at night to change the locks. I then call and with the different lawyers of people who are learning about it, and they were told, oh, it's just till, you know, Monday when there was gonna be a hearing in court, but the judge never said shut the place down. The judge said he's gonna continue to leave the bankruptcy open at least until 14th June, which is, like, 13 days away. So why would why why would he do that? And I then explained through his lawyers to Miguel because I don't speak to him, certainly, I'm alone. I'll explain why in a moment. That I'm the the sole managing member of the LLC, Free Speech Systems. And under that type of corporation, in the type of bankruptcy, the Free Speech System, it's just a fact. It's not even debatable that I'm the sole managing member, and I actually make the critical decisions and things. He just reports back to the court. If he disagrees with what I'm doing, he's a monitor. If he disagrees with what I'm doing, he has to go to the court. He can't act on his authority to just say, close the doors. Then by the evening, I learned from my lawyers to talk to his lawyers that he was gonna close it until 14th June, that Friday in Houston and at the federal courthouse. And all of my lawyers are good, and I've also talked to some of the top lawyers in Texas. I mean, the really top people also stop right there. And they said, this is Alice in Wonderland stuff. I mean, this is crazy. But this is this is the Trump Derangement Syndrome. It turns out this guy is a huge Hillary supporter, a huge democrat. I didn't know this. And the last few weeks, we've been going on the office weeks here telling everybody that I'm gonna get people killed and that I'm a bad person and because I'm telling people I'll take the vaccine and that shows like this should not be on the air. Now he said this in front of some of the crew that doesn't wanna be on TV. Sean Arman, 2 weeks ago, he came in his office, and there was a promo up there with myself and guest and Tucker Carlson, and he just started talking to the TV. You know, not yelling at it, but just, you know, just just oh, that's terrible. Blah blah blah. And then it gets even crazier. He is clearly, no doubt about it, tried to set me up. My my lawyers agree. Everybody agrees. They saw it happen. I wasn't in bankruptcy when free speech was in the 1st 6 months, And I already had some advertising that I was doing with John Harvick, who joined for many years, been there 20 something years. He was the manager of that. And I told my lawyers as in, you know, as assets, I have some of this money over here that I've been paid by advertisers. Now that I'm in bankruptcy, we'd bring this over there. Absolutely. And so they in meeting after meeting with the kill, they would bring this up and say, okay. Let's talk about it later. That's, oh, yeah. Okay. We're gonna figure something out. And they'd be like, okay. Well, they went ahead and filed after a few months of this in the court in amongst everything else in my assets and said, by the way, we have this money. We're trying to negotiate to get into free speech systems or maybe to orally give us guidance, but you have to report all this stuff or it's a felony. And I didn't understand what was happening at the top. I I just don't imagine that there's there's there's people like this. They're just so plentiful, but you see, nobody that was very, very reputable or let's say top shelf, CRO wanted to come be the chief reorganization officer for. So this guy comes along, comes in very nice. Oh, I'm in a blah blah blah. I'm living with all your politics, but, you know, I wanna you'll get this done and the and and and and take care of the the creditors, all the rest of it. And I'm like, okay. And you know, he had a he's done some small stuff and he'd been known for a long time. And you know, he didn't have a good name, didn't have a bad name. But he's kinda like, yeah, you know, he's a, you know, low low level guy. But but he's done some of these and he is in that court, so it means he's authorized by that court. And compared to the last guy we had that didn't even know what he was doing and and was just unbelievable disaster. And That's a whole other story. I so I so I I brought him in. And then immediately, he cuts off all the advertising coming directly to Free Speech Systems. Okay? Harmon started doing some of the side jobs over a decade ago. He's been there 22 years because a lot of guests go, hey. I'm coming on the show. I wanna help Alex. It's not a lot of the guests, but but out of a ton of guests, but it it it's it's a lot, by the way. It's, like, maybe 15 guests over the years Have said, we'd like to do a rev share since you're already doing every I interviewed my book. We'd like to pay you, you know, $5 whatever each book. And then it would be Harmon because he's also been a producer booking guest. He's Jack Alltray. He's been there 22 years. I would let Harmon take those smaller little deals and do that. And so McGill's like, nope. Well well, at first, he said that was all fine, and we're trying to get a deal that didn't bring the money in. Then he reports to the court that we are taking in this money and that we're doing this stuff and basically implies we've committed a crime, which it potentially would have been if this was true. While I have the justice department and literally at my depositions physically there and on the phone and they hardly ever do that, the US trustees office out of DC hoping that I commit some crime and and and reading me my rights. This is not going to only be sworn in. They understand you understand US code such such such such such they put in front of you? And if you say anything wrong, we're gonna put you in prison. I mean, you're talking about witch hunt. I'm like, yeah. So obviously, going into this whole thing, I know to tell the total truth, that's my only defense, plus I'm a straight shooter. But I'm digressing so much, Chad. That's why it's hard to just just tell us quickly. Look. I'm sorry. I'll finish up in a moment and give you the information. So going back to this for just a second. He immediately comes in and gets rid of all the major big advertisers that were going directly to free speech systems because that was being, you know, managed previously by the administrative part of the building that I ran and did stuff. I was putting it directly into free free systems. Again, Harman had always just done some of the little stuff as a producer because he'd set it up with the guests and do it that way, and it's a hassle. And sometimes it would fall through the cracks if I tried to have the other people do it. So long story short, here we go. I just got the, you know, bread crumbs stuff. And so I'm bringing McGill gets rid of $12,000,000 of advertisers. The the that's what we live with the year. That's what it was the previous. They all does. Here's where $12,000,000 of advertisers, all of our advertisers just just got some. No. You're not aware that ad agency. It doesn't matter. I'm like, we don't pay ad agency 10%. I go, it's, like, 30 with some ad agencies. He doesn't know any of the business or I thought he didn't. He kills $12,000,000 of advertising. He then, again, will never make a deal to take the money over that I've got because now I'm in bankruptcy, and I'm trying to pay the free speech systems. At least part of it should go there. We're trying to get guidance from the court because he won't respond. And he doesn't even know we filed this in a court because he doesn't do any work to speak of. And so he goes, oh my god. This could be criminal. He goes around telling some of the crew, oh, Alex and John Harmon got caught in something really bad. And I'm like, excuse me. And he goes, yeah. I had to follow this with the court that you did this, but don't worry. You're not gonna get in trouble if you work with me. And I go I go, excuse me? I said and it was like the sound of a record skipping our car crash. I was like, I have a good memory. We've been at least 3 or 4 meetings with my lawyers and you and ours and and my CPA where they're writing notes about everything. These people inspected me, searched everything, came through my house. I mean, I hired, the the best people and almost got proctology exams. They need to stick their arm up my ass, but they came close. Okay? Alright. These people don't play games. K? I mean, I went and hired, like, big receiver people. And I said, these are people that take over stuff. And I said, I want you to do a proctology exam. I don't want to there to be a red penny that does not get reported. And and they said this for the individual was the biggest report ever to the judge. The judge loved it. I mean, it was it was down to them asking about my cat and its value, which was, like, 2 grand, my wife's cat and daughter's cat. So if you had wife, you took 2 grand per cat. I'm not into fancy animals or horses or stuff. You know? But but, I mean, this is a ragdolls or bad ass cats. I'm a little bit I'm a big advocate of them. I'm not even really cat, but ragdolls are like dogs. I'm digressing because I'm just going from the right from the history of this. And so I'm sitting there watching all this unfold, and I'm like, excuse me. We've been in meeting after meeting about this with the lawyers and with John Harmon because I wanted John Harmon to come over and bring back all the other advertising that that used to be handled over here that you got rid of. He's a really good salesman. He knows how to organize this to get the ads produced and get them all. He knows every step. And he's like, oh, yeah. We might do that on the road. And then for almost a year, we'll never do that. And I said, Pat, I'm not gonna meet alone with you anymore because I don't know what you're gonna make up in the future, and my lawyers told me not to. And I said, you know you lied. And I said, if you do it one more time, I'm gonna have to go public because it looks like you're trying to set me up. Oh, no. I'm your buddy. I'm your friend. Then in March, I'm going to be interviewed by Tucker Carlson. I get the email of a secret filing that he asked nobody yet. The judge doesn't do this. It's not it's just crazy. The judge gives it to my lawyers, gives it to me, and it says, I am incompetent. It says that I'm basically stealing money that he caught me with all this money. You know, he needs to protect things, that that he needs the power to fire me and that he needs to be the exclusive member controller. The law says you can't do that. Okay? And they were gonna file that. We had the document, you know, and and and and the plan. And then he never even filed it because, you know, I mean, it's it's a joke. I mean, it's it's it's just crazy. So now let's get to what's currently happening. So so in there again in there again, he says that he caught me doing this stuff that I told him meeting and meeting and meeting about, like, what are we supposed to do? And my lawyers are there going, yeah. You need to take this money. And we follow the court and say, hey. We've got this money. Months months months before he reports the court, he caught me with money. So, again, now it's so clear. See, if he asked me and Harmon, 2 people in a crime, it's now a conspiracy and the things are much worse. And that's what the smart people are sure of it. This is a big setup, in my view, and it's very dangerous. I mean, this is this is this is serious, serious, serious, serious, serious stuff. And there's a lot of other evidence I've got and a lot of the things, and that was another thing. I mean, he just dumbfounded me. Like, 6 months ago, I think he'd been drinking. And he comes shuffling in my office about 5, 6 o'clock at night. And I go, hey, what's up, Pat? The door is open. And he pulls a chair up and he goes, you know, I'm thinking you just work with me. You have all the side deals you want. Do whatever you want. I'm not gonna do anything. I said, hey, man. I I gotta go to the bathroom real quick. So I go go out, come in there so I can document this stuff. And and he but then he even did it with Harmon in meetings. Oh, you can just keep the money. You just keep the money, kid. Well, Harmon's like, oh, no. Alex has it. He won't pay me. He's I'm talking to Vicky, his lawyer. I mean, this is all like that's like completely by the book. And then he's like, one more one more one more run at me. One more time? Come on in, Alex. Hey. You can keep the money. You know? And and I've had guys I later learned more in the CIA high level. Well, I'm in DC, and they use another lawsuit that nobody ever knew about or pending one to get them in a big high rise. And here come in the DNC top, you know, well known household names. You see them on MSNBC and CNN. And it did it does turn into a deal where they're not gonna sue me. I'm a lot no. It's like, hey. Don't you don't you work with us? Well, we were to be your friends. And then I'm sitting there with this super high power Republican lawyer and it's all weird. And then the next time in DC, the Republican lawyer comes to me at Trump Tower and goes, listen. The Russians wanna give you $3,000,000 right now in this trust. It's totally illegal. And it's the inter Internet research group right before that whole came out on the news. And I'm like, oh, I'm the Royal American. Are you recording this? Hell no. I'm not gonna take $3,000,000 to the Russians. So I immediately go to my other lawyers, go to the FBI, write up official reports, give it to them. So I am a major target, folks. Okay? And that's not 1 tenth of the stories I could tell you right now. So that's why I know what this is now. That's what I know what I'm seeing. I mean, it is my opinion that he's been approached and is and is doing this by the feds. But it was a swarm of federal, lawyers from the just department in this building at my depositions. And there were a bunch of federal depositions in the bankruptcy in both of them. And they are sitting there with their pen and paper, and they're sitting there with their phones recording, and they're looking at me like this. I mean, it's I'm like so and they're so pissed that I'm not a crooked person. They're all so upset that you can't throw me in a fucking prison. And now they're trying to do it to Elon Musk and everybody else. They try this with Ted Nugent. People forget about this. He's coming on the show today to talk about it. He's been through this. Okay? And they want me off the air, folks, and they wanna punish me for exposing Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, the WikiLeaks, all the weird Aleister Crowley pedophile crap. And that's what this is. And I also gave Trump briefings. I never wanna brag about this because I became such a target, but they all knew. They were phones were tapped. And I got briefings to Trump. I explained to him who was bad in the White House, Fiona Hill and all of them. They got really pissed. Remember those headlines that everyone missed. We used to stop Alex Jones talking to Trump. They said Kelly's like, general Kelly's main mission was that. I mean, it's in the news. So I'm not trying to brag, folks. I I did the the heavy lifting. It was the 1776 information warfare. So they want my head on a stick. So then yesterday, I told the crew, I said, within a couple minutes within a couple minutes after the show or during it, you will get a call by them again saying shut down the company. And sure enough, they called the guards. They told them, yeah, we're shutting it down. This is going on. And, again, I get on the phone to the lawyers. I haven't called them, and the lawyers explain again to McGill's lawyers, he's the sole managing member. You can't do that. But then I'm not gonna have some confrontation with the private security company that's that's that's doing a good job over the years hurt this place that doesn't know the law. So I have to tell the security company. And I said, stop being conned by this. Do your research. And they did and so they pulled back. But there's a hearing tomorrow. This could be shut at any time. He could hire or give him ideas. Another security company that he can fool to do this. So if goons show up to try to throw us out of here, we were sleeping up here at night when I was saw my kids this morning. If they throw me out of the building or or or if they come and try to do that, I'm not gonna leave. I am going to lay on the ground so they claim to be violence, and I am going to call the police. And then when the police get here, I'm gonna say, have you ever seen someone thrown out of a building with no paperwork? And then I'm going to simply call my lawyer, and I got in my email. I'm going to say, I'm a sole managing member. You understand what that means under law? I'm the sole managing member, not this not this CRO that thinks he's fucking John Wayne. So that's why this is crazy, folks. I mean, the stuff he did trying to set me up and John Harmon. And and then now that he's order trying to order people without the authority, to to to to shut the doors here. Oh, but security was gonna stay, and and his people were gonna stay on the payroll. When my lawyers asked, I said, watch. Ask him. Security will still be there and all his people he hired that basically do nothing in Houston, all his cronies. And in the past, that's right. They're all essential. They're gonna still get paid, but there is no money to pay you going forward, you know, because of the cash collateral meeting that the judge has said is no problem. Folks, this is the level. So I'm dealing with someone that feels empowered by the system, and they feel emboldened with what they've done to Trump. And this is the move they're making right now. So I don't think this guy is a loose cannon. And it turns out he's worked in executive positions at pharmaceutical companies, a lot of other stuff. And he literally goes around saying, I deserve to be in jail for what I say. I deserve to be in jail because I'm getting people killed by not getting to take vaccines. That's a quote. Harman's really good at exact quotes going to in 2 years. I'm getting people killed. I need to be in jail. And I've been told that by the security head guy. Yeah. You gotta watch that guy. You know, he comes to the office and talks crap about you constantly. But now magically, things got different. I don't know. I think it's that people are confused. They don't know the law. I had to explain to everybody back when the COVID started that, no, we're essential. Media is not shut down. I had to show them the federal law. People weren't sure. They were breaking the law. I mean, I know how to go read the damn law and call a few lawyers. Okay? So I I've been through this enough. I know what I'm talking about. So I don't know what's gonna happen today. I don't know what's gonna happen tomorrow. I've seen some people say it, oh, there's nothing happening. Jones just saying this bullshit. And it's gonna be very sad we're able to shut down info wars, and then that proves it to you. Okay? I'm sleeping up here on a couch. This is going on. I'm completely freaked out. I love the crew. We've got such a great history, and this is the reality of what is going on. I have been so nice to these lawyers, so nice to the CRO, so freaking jolly and and and and and and and nice. Only person I'm a jerk to sometimes is the crew, more liable mistakes. Okay? I'm nice to everybody else. And and and and the idea I'm like Santa Claus, man. And the idea that that that they're doing this to us is because they wanna shut down your ability to hear the truth because we have a cool with this country that's making its move, ladies and gentlemen, and they've weaponized everything. Now I'm gonna do Mike Adams right now and apologize a little late to get there and do this. And then, tonight, 4 to 8 PM, I'll be live. We've got a whole bunch of huge guests coming on the show. I've got, Ted Nugent calling me today. I wanna know what's going on, and he he it's great to have him. Obviously, he can explain how this was good to him and others. I mean, this is going down, folks. They tried similar stuff though on on Ted Nugent, and he's paying a lot for telling the truth as well. So god bless you. Infowars.com is there for now. The thing to follow is real Alex Jones on x. That's there for now. And to really follow that and and to really share that and to support my sponsor, daughterjonesnaturals.com. Because daughtershowsnaturals.com, we'll put a link below here. It's my dad's company totally separate with no debt. It's got all the products in there. It's ready to ship. They're amazing products. All the products are available at Infowars are now available over there because he developed them. And, they kicked his products out in the last year. They just started phasing them out. No. We're not reordering your products. We're not giving you a persuasive money anymore. We'll we'll just not have those products. That's another reason. Infowars has lost so much money. Oh, get rid of your advertising. Get rid of your products. Oh, no. Everything you do is bad. Everything you do is corrupt. Every deal you have, it's all just made up. What it was was shutting us down, squeezing us down. Oh, no. You can't you can't go out on the road. He told the security people, no. Don't don't don't go with Jones like they always do out to one of his gun shoots. We don't want gun shoots here. That's the you know, that I mean, literally oh, no. You don't go to the border. Plenty of money over there. No. You don't go to the you don't go to any of these places anymore. And he always lies. It's like, yeah. Yeah. You go to the RNC and DNC. I'm like, well, the hotel is only 3,000 more. We don't get them now. And then later, oh, yeah. You're not going to any of that. So it's it's what he's read a handbook online or something. But once you understand the handbook because I've learned his whatever the handbook is from him watching, it's it's a formula. And I think the guy thinks he's James Bond or something, man. And, listen. I can give people the benefit of the doubt, but this did not anymore. So that's where this is, and I, I don't like having to be aggressive. I don't like having to do what I've done, but I'm I'm proud of it because it's the right thing to do. And I have integrity, and I'm never back a doubt. I'm never giving up. Alright. I'm gonna go do Mike Adams on his show, and then I'm gonna be doing my show 4 PM Central, infowars.comforward/show for now. And, you know, this is my my map. I bought this, like, over a decade ago. Had a frame put in here. I'm gonna take this regardless in case we get shut down. So this little piece of info words will still be there. I've shot so many videos in front of this. I'll probably at my house for a while. I haven't didn't make any other plans because I wanted to faithfully fight for Infowars as long as hard as I could. I don't know how old it here. Judge may say, sure. Shut it down tomorrow. So, and and and the judge order comes through, I will, follow the order, and that's the info wars. And then I'll assess what's happened and then tell you whether I think it was the right thing to do or not. But the judge is Trump appointed. He's been fair. He follows the law right down the line to where he's never gets rarely reversed. He is scholarly. And so it it it it he doesn't have a lot of wiggle room. He doesn't actually have that much power, actually. It's it's it's it's the trustees in this and and and these these people, that that are doing this. And, you know, they're they're running things, and it's it's it's creepy. It's very, very, very, very creepy. And I I know what happened now. The mission was get out at shows and use the process to find something corrupt or manufacture it. And I believe that's what was done. It's very, very clear and it's already happened to March. They see me as a major target. I mean, this is this is incredible. And if they weren't killing everybody with the poison shots, I would probably just retire at this point and leave the country because I don't I I mean, it's but they're they're killing kids. So I'm not gonna give up, and and they're just everything's too evil now. And so I just hope everybody gets how much trouble this country's in. Alright. I love you. I appreciate you. Real Alex Jones, and please go to doctor joesdactyls.com. We have amazing products there. They really are good. Be sure to check them out. Thank you. Let's go ahead and go to Bikini Truether in Nevada. Thanks for calling. Go ahead. Speaker 1: Hey, Alex. I do wanna say one thing about doctor Jones Naturals, if I could. I know it's off topic, but it's super important to me. Sure. During COVID, I went there, and I got the facial serum. It's called Super Silver Facial Serum. And, I'm telling you that it's changed my life. My son started taking it. His acne went away, and it's really good for underneath the, base cream that I put on every day. And so I just want I know that you need support, and that's one item that so that we can stay out of World War 3 to keep you on air is for people to go there and get stuff. Speaker 0: Absolutely. This is a patented nano silver way beyond chloro silver that's in the creams, in the face spray, in the toothpaste, in the in the wound gel, and in the immune gargle, and it's it's it's amazing. And you're absolutely right. People that have acne have had incredible results with this. So I'm very thankful that you liked it, and I, you know, hope you'll continue to support doctor joesnaturals.com because my dad's our big sponsor. The deep state's coming after him. And so it's a strategic place to support plus the great products. Doctorjosnatals.com. Anything else you wanna add? Speaker 1: No. Just I appreciate you and, God bless. Speaker 0: Thank you for your support. Now please take action by going to doctor jonesnattles.com today and checking out the amazing products. Speaker 1: What did he just say? Speaker 0: He said there's a storm coming in. Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: We told you what was going to happen, and it did. Now we're telling you what's coming at real Alex Jones on X.

@WojPawelczyk — Wojciech Pawelczyk

Posted - June 4, 2024 at 9:38 AM

Saved - September 27, 2024 at 10:51 AM

@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk

Flashback: Alex Jones crashes The Young Turks, 2016 💥😂 https://t.co/Egdo1eWW5V

Video Transcript AI Summary

Alex Jones and Roger Stone appeared on the Young Turks show, wearing "Hillary for Prison" shirts. The host expressed his dislike for the shirts. Jones asked if they had started the revolution. The host said he wants to restore American democracy with progressives and conservatives. The host accused Donald Trump and Roger Stone of being accused of rape in court papers. The host called Stone a liar, referencing a previous admission of lying. The host told them to get off the show. Jones claimed that the hosts brought them on stage and then attacked them. He asked if someone spat in his face. He said they were invited to be interviewed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. We're back on the Young Turks. Sorry. Obviously, a little bit of commotion here as Alex Jones and a guy significantly worse than him, entered the stage here. Speaker 1: Right here. Where? 2. And they're black. You want them out. They're right here to pull up. There's change. Speaker 0: What changes in demographics is that he wins white males in such overwhelming numbers. It's that it overcomes every other demographic advantage. Go sit in your lap. Oh, Jesus Christ. Alex Jones. How are you doing? Speaker 1: See you, man. You're looking sexy. Speaker 0: Alright. Speaker 1: Hey. How's the revolution going? You guys start the revolution? Speaker 0: We are indeed, Alex. The revolution is afoot. Welcome to the Young Turks. The Young Speaker 1: Turks of America is not. I Speaker 0: am going to restore American democracy along with progressives and conservatives Speaker 1: in the country. Alright. Well, I gotta tell you. I am really, really proud to be here with you. It's good to meet you in person. I don't think How are you guys doing? Speaker 0: We're doing okay. Speaker 1: You like all our Hillary for prison shirts everywhere? Speaker 0: No. I kinda despise it. What what shirts are they? Speaker 1: I haven't seen that, do You haven't seen oh my god. You didn't see me? I don't exist if you didn't see me. I'm not. Speaker 0: Alright, guys. No. It's Speaker 1: Okay. Here. Story right here. It's rape. It's Will Clinton that says rape. No. I got it. Hi there, Naylor. That's the big no. The rogersoll's family. Alright. Speaker 0: You wanna take show my show over? I'll take your show over. Speaker 1: Go ahead. Speaker 0: Okay. You know what? Who does this kind of shirt? Speaker 1: First of Speaker 0: all, sick guy. Second of all Bill Clinton's got a rapist, boss. No. You you you know who you know who's accused in court papers? Fuck. You know who's accused in court papers of being a rapist? Donald j Trump. Donald Trump, Roger Stone. Speaker 1: You know Speaker 0: this. It's in court papers. Oh, yeah. You're a sick dude, Roger Stone. Speaker 1: A little rant off with a rant off. Speaker 0: You assault me all the time. You never give me a chance for these damn shots. I should give you a hat to job. Hold on. Hold on. You're a sick man, Roger Stone. Speaker 1: Roger Stone. Speaker 0: Roger Stone. Speaker 1: Roger Stone. Roger Stone. Roger Stone. Roger Stone. Speaker 0: Roger Stone. You're the world's biggest liar. Out. Didn't you admit that you lied about Ellie Spencer? Didn't you already admit that? You're not breaking Speaker 1: him off. You're not breaking him off. Take him off. Speaker 0: First of all, Alex, this ain't our fucking show. Speaker 1: I don't know. Okay. No. Speaker 0: No. No. They surely ain't your fucking show. Are you afraid to the better? Okay. Are you kidding me? No. No. Alright. Roger, yeah. Run away. Speaker 1: Roger, don't go. He wants to debate you right now. Speaker 0: I'm not gonna debate this guy. You're a hatchet, man. I don't know why anyone in the media takes Speaker 1: him seriously. Speaker 0: All you do is lie. You're known as the biggest liar in media. You're the biggest liar in media. The liar, loser. There's nobody watching. Speaker 1: I'm sorry, dude. Guys, can you get out of my skin? Don't get too mad. We don't ever Speaker 0: alright. Well, first Speaker 1: of all, this is actually mad. You're actually really upset. I I just said something that's a question. Hey, man. Nobody watches you. Speaker 0: We know nobody watches you. Speaker 1: Arabia is hard fighting it up, your little t on. Hey. First of all, let Speaker 0: me explain something. Alright? Okay. This is bullshit. Hold on. Hold on. We're against Saudi Arabia. Dumbass. We talk about that all the time. Speaker 1: Oh, really? What the fuck? What a fucking cowardly little bitch. Yeah. Get the fuck out. I'm gonna spin you spit in his face? Right here. Did you spit in his face? Right here. Did you spit in his face? Somebody's been asking you. Did you spit in his face? Speaker 0: That was Speaker 1: pretty awesome. I'll be here as you get to come to us. Vincent. Will you say something? No. We're just here. I hear the young church wanna interview us from other people. They bring us over. They say jump up on stage with him some guy. And then I get up there, and they, like, spit in my face and attack me. And they're, like, trying to say we did something wrong. It's crazy.

@myhiddenvalue — Not A Number

Posted - June 7, 2024 at 10:40 PM

Saved - June 9, 2024 at 12:12 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

'Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening'. 5min.... https://t.co/J2K8Fp2P8v

Video Transcript AI Summary

Many leaders are seizing opportunities during the COVID-19 crisis, echoing similar sentiments. Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, aims to shape global politics and promote a one-world government through the Great Reset. The WEF hosts exclusive gatherings in Davos, Switzerland, where influential figures meet behind closed doors. Schwab's agenda, outlined in his book "COVID-19: The Great Reset," advocates for centralized control and a digital currency.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Under the new rules provided by the COVID 19 emergency, many other elected leaders were empowered to show their true colors. Interesting how they all marched in perfect lockstep while chanting the same slogans. Speaker 1: This pandemic has provided an opportunity. Speaker 2: We are right now with an economy in crisis, but with an incredible opportunity. It's certainly a major crisis, but it also offers us a unique opportunity Unprecedented opportunity Speaker 3: great opportunity for reset. Opportunity for us to rethink. For a reset. Speaker 0: It's almost as if they all attended the same school of thought and studied under the same professor. Speaker 2: Some people would say this revolution is characterized by the fight of robots against human beings. And we will win this fight. Speaker 0: Professor Klaus Schwab was born in 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany, where Nazi crimes against humanity were committed. His father, Eugene Wilhelm Schwab, was the managing director of Escher Weiss Ravensburg, a company that used slave labor to manufacture weapons of war for the 3rd Reich. While Klaus's father was at the helm, the Nazi party awarded Escher Weiss Ravensburg the title of National Socialist Model Company. Years later, Klaus Schwab joined the board of directors at Esher Weiss Ravensberg where he played a key role in the development of South Africa's nuclear weapons program during the darkest years of the racist apartheid regime. Today, Klaus Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. Speaker 1: If you'd like to meet the people who are supposed to repair the state of the world or give a piece of your mind to the bankers who helped get us into this mess, we can tell you where to find a lot of them. The World Economic Forum. Speaker 0: Founded in 1971, the World Economic Forum is an international private organization which receives 1,000,000,000 of tax free dollars from its members and their global enterprises. Every year, the WEF brings together its members with world leaders, big pharma executives, tech titans, Hollywood celebrities, media personalities, and Internet influencers to meet in the secluded mountains of Davos, Switzerland. Speaker 1: It is a tiny town folded into the Swiss Alps, a village where you could bump into Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, the head of of Google, and the queen of Jordan all in one place. A lot of reporters cover the forum, but few get inside. It turns out there are 2 Davos', one you see and one you don't. After hours, hours, there are hundreds of private parties where deals are done. People who can't be seen together in public can meet here. Speaker 2: Your royal highnesses, excellencies, distinguished heads of state and government, The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room. Speaker 3: Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is particularly upfront and even proud of his ability to shape and influence world politics. Speaker 2: I created the immunity of global shapers as a means, as a force to shape our common future. Speaker 3: And, of course, their global young leaders program is a grooming ground so that when they ultimately infiltrate cabinets Speaker 2: We penetrate the cabinets. Speaker 3: They will likely tend to govern a certain way. Speaker 2: Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. Speaker 3: The names in the countries he mentioned ended up being some of the most and authoritative during this pandemic. Speaker 2: Names like miss Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and so on. Speaker 3: Other names, Jacinda Ardern, Sebastian Kurz, Mauricio McCree, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Ma, Gavin Newsom, Stephane Vansel, Chelsea Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sanjay Gupta, doctor Liana Nguyen, Alexander and Jonathan Soros, George Soros' sons, and several of the Rothschilds. And, of course Speaker 2: Now who could represent such a world better than you, prime minister? Speaker 0: In 2014, Klaus Schwab called for the great reset Speaker 2: We need a great reset. Speaker 0: Which he positioned as the solution to the world's most urgent issues. The dark reality of Schwab's agenda is detailed in his best selling book, COVID 19, The Great Reset. His end game mission is to replace independent governance with a top down controlled one world government and a central bank controlled digital currency.

@RealAlexJones — Alex Jones

Posted - June 12, 2024 at 4:31 PM

Saved - June 12, 2024 at 4:40 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Bombshell! Alex Jones Predicted COVID Lockdowns and COVID Tyranny Back In 2009 Support http://drjonesnaturals.com

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the accidental contamination of a vaccine with live avian flu virus, which is virtually impossible according to government officials and top vaccine scientists. The vaccine, produced by Baxter, contained the deadly h5n1 avian flu virus and was distributed to 18 countries. The speaker suggests that this contamination may have been intentional, as mixing the avian flu virus with other flu viruses in the vaccine could create a potent, super airborne, and deadly bioweapon. The speaker also mentions the history of government involvement in bioweapons and genetic engineering, highlighting the potential dangers of these practices.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When it comes and when it happens, many of you that were laughing and giggling, you're finally gonna freak out. You're gonna run off and beg for the vaccine or whatever they've got for you. And the 1st bioweapon they release, and this is the big news story, the 1st bioweapon they release in the next phase will be isolated. You know, it'll it'll kill a 100,000 or so, and then they'll teach you how to go under biohazard control and how to lock down cities and that they're the boss and they know best. We've all got a thumb scan to buy and sell to stop it from happening. And then the next one, as they beta test it, will kill a couple million, and then it'll lock things down even more. And then the next one will kill 2,000,000,000 people. Then they'll totally lock down society to a level unimaginable, and you won't care if your neighbor's being drugged off and arrested. All you care about is that, you know, you get these proper vaccines to protect you from the progenian ziklon 12 supervise or whatever they engineer. Tomorrow's news, today. Normally, it is every 6 months to a year that I come across something this big, this important, this insane, this out of control. But because things are accelerating, like birth pains, they're getting closer and closer together. The last time we did this was January 27th this year. What? Just a month and, 8, 9 days ago. Little over a month ago, new legislation authorizes FEMA camps in the US. Why was this story so important with all the other news we had about FEMA camps and civilian inmate labor camp program and congress being threatened with martial law? Because it confirmed our analysis of the architecture of the camps, how they're gonna roll them out, how they're gonna operate, how the local police will be merged under them, how they'll have the clergy response teams preparing the population to go into them for PR purposes, for brainwashing purposes. And it confirmed all of that. It confirmed our analysis and all the big pieces of the puzzle that we had. You know, much of it admitted, but it connected the dots of how they're gonna roll it out, how they're gonna push it, and indeed, that's now happening. Now that said, this story that I said was a red alert a month ago is nothing. This story is nothing. Nothing. Nothing. I'm a say that again. Nothing compared to what we're going to cover. This is nothing. When I saw this story last night and then spent hours researching it and confirmed it was accurate, I had trouble sleeping. I basically became upset at my stomach. So much acid was produced. My I'm somebody who can have, you know, maybe because I'm stupid. It's not because I'm tough. You're not gonna have some MP threatening me putting a 45 to my chest, and I don't get upset. It's almost like I'm numb to things like that, but but my hands started sweating. I started sweating last night. My my palms were sweating. I had sweat, and then my my house was cold with the air conditioner on. It's already gotten warm here, and I was sweating over this. Okay? Because it's not just the report I've got that's coming up, this group of reports. It's that it connects in to hundreds of other key pieces of information we've had. I'll give you a hint what it is. You know, from all the little pieces of info I've got and knowing the enemy operation, I was able to peg 911, even the target, months before. Well, I'm telling you, it's gonna be bio attack. You know, when this happens, and it and and I it's about a 98% chance it will happen in the next decade. Now we could change that if we got really involved and started having mass sit ins and, you know, making it the main issue no matter what anybody said or did, we could probably stop them. Maybe. They may go ahead and just do it anyways. But then we may have people catch them trying. And just like that we caught them trying to ship the 6 cruise missiles out of the country to claim Iran had them, and then they killed, what was it last time I checked, close to 20 of the military men that were witnesses to what really happened with the Minot Dakota situation. Remember that? But nukes are nothing compared to this. I mean, you can drop a nuke on a city of 2,000,000 people depending on the megaton, and, you know, it'll kill half of them and radiate the rest and but we can survive that. That's an isolated incident. Most of you listening right now to this show, if we don't turn this around, are dead. You understand? I'm dead. You're dead. Our children are probably gonna die or not have parents. And when it comes and when it happens, many of you that were laughing and giggling, you're finally gonna freak out. You're gonna run off and beg for the vaccine or whatever they've got for you. And the first bio weapon they release, and this is the big news story, the first bio weapon they release in the next phase will be isolated. You know, it'll it'll it'll kill a 100000 or so. And then they'll teach you how to go under biohazard control and how to lock down cities and that they're the boss and they know best. We've all got a thumb scan to buy and sell to stop it from happening. And then the next one, as they beta test it, will kill a couple million, and then it'll lock things down even more. And then the next one will kill 2,000,000,000 people. Then they'll totally lock down society to a level unimaginable, and you won't care if your neighbors being drugged off and arrested. All you care about is that, you know, you get these proper vaccines to protect you from the progenian, zyklon 12, the super virus or whatever they engineer. And then, of course, they'll finally kill you too. That's their stated plan. And when I saw the reports I'm about to cover when we come back from break and I read them, it was stunning. The room almost wheeled around me. And dots that were already connected, a clear picture that was already there, all documented. It just went three-dimensional. So much more detail, so much more understanding. And and I know their plan. I understand their operation, but to realize that they're really going to do it, to know that we were right about everything else because we were just reading what the globalist said they would do, and that they mean everything they promised, and they mean everything they said they're gonna do in their white papers, in their directives, in their councils, in their world governmental system. It's a scholarly research, but it's there for those that wish to look. It's public open source. Now it's nothing but lies with their public face into the general public. How they wanna help you, and they love you, and they care about you, and it's the children and all this. But they keep all their promises when it comes to the trilateral commission, CFR, Club of Rome, United Nations, the big central banks. So when we come back for the balance of this hour, I am gonna break down the most important story I have ever covered on this radio show. It is more important than when I went on air and said they're gonna blow up the World Trade Centers and probably blame it on their asset, Bin Laden. They're gonna do it the next 2 months. Call the White House. Tell them don't do it. July 25th and did it for 2 months straight till the enemy carried out the operation. This dwarfs that. You see 911 was only carried out to set the stage for the police state to suppress the general population as they financially bankrupt you in preparation to use the bioweapons. We'll die for the system. We are back live. Okay. What I'm gonna do is I'm just gonna read this news article, then I'm gonna come back and go through all the points and why this is so serious and connect it to other background information to make it crystal clear. This is by Paul Watson. He wrote it this morning. Did a great job. I contacted him and Kurt last night, and they got all this posted. This morning, accidental contamination of vaccines with live avian flu virus, virtually impossible. That's what government officials and top vaccine scientists are saying. Now this is a strain of bird flu that kills 60 to 90% of humans it comes in contact with. They gave it to ferrets, and it killed all of them deader than a hammer. This thing is so wide spectrum that it attacks, she normally a flu or a separate cold bug for that matter. You'll have zoological organisms, and you'll have organisms that affect humans. There's very few diseases except things like very few pathogens, very few microbes, to use the old term, that attack humans and different types of animals. You can get leprosy from a few animals like an armadillo. You can get, rabies if you're bitten by a bat or a dog that has it, But those are not airborne. They're not airborne. In some rare cases, rabies can stay alive a few seconds, so people have been in caves with millions of bats and been studying them. And my grandfather going to UT had one of his favorite professors, an archaeologist in caves while he was in college. Went out, looking for Indian artifacts in a cave and got rabies from bats, but I'm already digressing. I said I'd cover the article. The point is I've studied bird flu intently because I've seen the establishment hyping it, preparing everybody, saying billions will probably die from bird flu. You know, we've seen those headlines. We've seen that hype, that fear mongering. We've seen them talk about how it's going to spread. All these top scientists and virologists and epidemiologists and microbiologists have been killed in association with researching the avian flu. They'll walk out front of their house and be machine gunned. They'll be tortured to death. They'll be drowned in Houston. You know, they'll be run over and back back over at the college in front of people. They're murdering bioweapon scientists in England, Australia, Russia, Germany, the United States, Canada, everywhere. It's in the 100 and 100. And it's always in association with bird flu research, either the treatment or identifying it or in weapons production. Now remember, they dug up the 1918 Spanish flu itself clearly a German bioweapon. A lot of evidence shows that. They dug that up from whalers near the Arctic who've been frozen in the permafrost. Pentagon did that, what, 8 years ago, then suddenly they announced the news. Oh, suddenly, the the old strain has shown back up, but that's separate from this. Bayer Pharmaceutical that's tied in to Baxter Pharmaceutical are the ones, remember, that shipped out the AIDS tainted blood to millions of people. It was Baxter with Bayer. Baxter in Europe. That's been on MSNBC knowing it came out in court that it was gonna kill the people that came in contact with it, knowing that that hemophiliac blood product drug was filled with it and shipping it out. So this is a very nasty group of companies. Now this is this is so serious, and we're about to go to break. I'm just gonna come back and read the article. Artist sort of getting in the background on it. There's hundreds of pieces of info that go into my overall announcement that this is just off the charts bad. It's a level 3 weaponized bio weaponized level security. Level 3, And they claim, accidentally, bird flu, the type that kills humans, was shipped there and then mixed in with the the exact type of regular flu virus that it could recombine with and mutate. Stay with us. Speaker 1: Alone on a hill. The man Speaker 2: with the foolish grin is keeping Speaker 1: perfectly still. But nobody wants to know him. Speaker 3: They can see that he's just Speaker 1: a fool, and he never gives an answer. But the fool on the head sees the sun Speaker 0: Alright. We're back live. Let's get straight into the most important article. And I've never said this before. This is the most important article with pieces of the puzzle, the tumblers falling in place that I have ever covered. This story itself, I'm gonna cover many articles. Headline, accidental contamination of vaccine with live avian flu virus, virtually impossible. This is in Canadian papers like the Toronto Sun. It's in British. It's in German. It's in Czech. It's in Russian. It's in Japanese. It's in Chinese. English papers as well. This story has been out for more than 24 hours. I learned of it last night, and nothing in the United States. Accidental contamination of vaccine with live avian flu virus, virtually impossible. And they were shipping this out. But a subcontractor did due diligence because so many times they don't radiate the regular flu vaccine, right, and it hurts people that they tested it on ferrets as they're supposed to do. And if they haven't radiated it right, it makes the ferret sick and they send it back. Well, guess what? It killed the ferrets, and so they Speaker 1: tested the vaccine, and it had bioweapon Speaker 0: in it. This was about to be vaccine, and it had bioweapon in it. Speaker 1: This was Speaker 0: about to be shipped out, and in fact, they're not even clear it may have been shipped out. Do you understand? Do you understand? Do you understand? Do you understand? People say, oh, this is scary, fair mongering, Alex. This is the real world, ladies and gentlemen. Government's killed 100 of millions of people last century. Zbigniew Brzezinski, who runs the White House foreign policy, brags in 2 of his books that the US funded poll pot, and he's proud of what they did. That guy killed 30% of his country's population, 3,000,000. Check papers question whether contaminated. Baxter vaccine was attempt to provoke pandemic. Mainstream national papers in the Czech Republic. You ought to go read these stories. They're all linked here up on infowars.comandprisonplanet.com. It sounds like I wrote them. They're saying there's no way this is on purpose. What on earth is going on? And they've got all these scientists who are experts on vaccine production going, this is on purpose. What's it gonna take for some of you to wake up? Dying? Watching whole cities dying? What is it gonna take for you to get it through your head that the new world order wants you dead? What is the back cover of my film endgame blueprint for global enslavement say? They want you dead. Czech newspapers are questioning if the shocking discovery of vaccines contaminated with a deadly avian flu virus, which were distributed to 18 countries by the American company, Baxter, were part of a conspiracy to provoke a pandemic. This was through its Austrian subsidiary. The claim holds weight because according to the very laboratory protocols that are routine for vaccine makers, mixing a live virus biological weapon with vaccine material by accident is virtually impossible. See, this this avian flu had nothing to do with the facility, nothing to do with the human vaccine for what they're guessing, you know, next year's flu is gonna be. Nothing to do with it. And it's in level 3 bioweapon lab. They admit that where the people don't even touch it. You know, they're using robotic arms. It's in chambers. They load the live virus in. They breed it up in deadly cultures, then they radiate it and ship it out. They damage the DNA. So you just had a autoimmune response supposedly. You don't have the full viral spread. And they put accelerants into it to accelerate an autoimmune response, and that's associated with the, brain inflammation and retardation in children, not just the mercury. Mercury does bring damage to children, but in itself is a red herring compared to the inflammation according to the brain surgeons and scientists we've had on here, countless ones. The company that released contaminated flu virus material from a plant in Austria confirmed Friday that the experimental product contained live live h5n1avianflu viruses, reports the Canadian press, Toronto Sun, on and on and on. Baxter flu vaccines contaminated with h five n one, otherwise known as the human form of Avian flu, one of the most deadly biological weapons on earth with a at least 60% kill rate were received by labs in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Slovenia. Initially, Baxter attempted to stonewall questions by invoking trade secrets and refused to reveal how the vaccines were contaminated with h five n one. After increased pressure, then they claimed that pure h five n one bird flu batches were sent by accident. This was seemingly an attempt to quickly change the story and hide the fact that the accidental contamination of a vaccine with a deadly bio agent like avian flu is virtually impossible, and the only way it could have happened was by willful gross criminal negligence. And mainstream news is saying that, not just me. Go read the Toronto Sun and others. Go read the checks. They're going, this is insane. Now stop right there. That isn't the evidence as damning as that is. That is secondary. That is tertiary. That is corollary. That is on the side of the road. What is in the middle of the road? The instructions they gave the companies for the mixture of the falsely labeled vaccine was the exact complex preparation to create a mutagen. That's what gave you the 1918 Spanish flu that killed at least 50,000,000 people. It was combined to mutate between the normal, extremely airborne, extremely contagious strain of flu with the bird flu to make it highly airborne and highly contagious. Are you starting to hear what I'm telling you, ladies and gentlemen? According to see see see, if this would have gotten out and may have, we don't know. So instead of your child just throwing up for 2 days, they die. They die. They die. You die. I die. We die. Then they take those FEMA plastic coffins they've got stored all over the country, and they come in in bio suits and they stick you in them. I'm gonna stop right there. Remember in my film Endgame. Remember doctor Eric Bianca, UT, saying he wants 90% of the American people, people of the world to die. He can't wait till Ebola becomes airborne and kills 90% of the world population, and he's ready for him and his family to die. But that isn't the issue. It said he went to the Texas Academy of Scientist. This was in the news. And when he said all this and projected with a PowerPoint, huge skulls on the wall, he got a standing ovation after standing ovation. Because if you go to the biology departments of any major university, more than half of the top scientists at these facilities and doing the research labs will tell you there's too many people in humans or a disease. Anybody who's been in biology knows this. Anybody who's been fellow students writing their PhD thesis papers, it's all about how humans are a disease and have to be gotten rid of. When my dad was at UT in high school, he was sent there as part of an advanced curriculum for gifted students. They tested the smartest kids in Texas and took the top 6 and pulled them aside and said, we want you to be part of a eugenics program. We're gonna reduce the world's population. My dad never told me that till he was at my office watching endgame before it came out. We were having argument in the car with my mother, and he said, no. It's all true, honey. They told me all this in college. You see, it's everywhere. This is who they are. They're in the positions of power. The FBI did go question Bianca because there he is with access to these laboratories. UT's got a level 3 bioweapons lab. They've got a nuclear reactor. Every time I mention that, people laugh. Yes. There's there's 2 nuclear reactors in Austin. And down in Galveston, there's a level 3 bio weapons lab that's messing with level 4 bio weapons. And it isn't just him. It's prince Charles, prince Philip, Jacques Cousteau, Ted Turner, you know, Peter Singer, all these top people. That's all they talk about. Just like in the movie, 13 Monkeys with Bruce Willis, where the crazy laboratory assistant of the scientist releases the airborne super flu, and it kills 99% of the population. That's who's in these laboratories. You know, remember, it just came out on Monday. What we already told you, samples and anthrax cases don't match. Strands from mailbox and prints that are not from Ivan's investigators say, and they clearly they they grabbed him, put him in government custody, killed him. You had to go to the local news to find that out, try to blame it on Bruce Ivens for the anthrax when it was a US government weaponized version, and that later came out and has been confirmed. Remember the foot and mouth release in 2000 in England? Weaponized. It shows up from Scotland to Cornwall, from the south to the north, on the island. It shows up in a 2 day period all over the country. It scores of locations. It's the most weaponized version ever seen. It kills all the cows and sheep that come in contact with it. We go on there and say that is weaponized clearly because we know farming and studied it and had scientists on about regular foot and mouth. Some call it hoof and mouth. And then it came out in the BBC. Oh, the level 4 bio weapons lab at Porton Down, doctor Debbie Kelly spoke out, and, of course, they killed him. Witnesses saw 5 men in black uniforms run run away from his dead body. In the woods, his wrists were slit with no blood there. There were pills inside of them that hadn't dissolved. Didn't matter. I mean, you you can have the killers on top of the body that run away, and they say it's a suicide. And it turned out that they admitted, oh, somebody snuck it out of level 4 bioweapons lab that had minefields around it, underground facilities, pressure sealed rooms, people with robotic arms messing with it. Somebody snuck it out, and then somebody spread it nationwide in a 2 day period. Yeah. Right. Somebody was able to go out and do that. I mean, I'm just giving you more and more of the dots. See, Because I have this knowledge from studying it just like many of you do. And, you know, over the years, that's why when we see this, we understand what it is. But on the face of it, they ship weapons grade bird flu that kills 60% of humans that get it conservatively. They ship it to labs all over Europe and to the subsidiary in Austria. And then what do they tell their subsidiary labs to do? What's what's the recipe? What's the ingredients list? What is the ingredients list? They tell them, you know, this is a 1 in a 1000000 accident. Well, another 1 in a 1000000 accident, they tell them the exact recipe with the exact this has been fingered by scientists as as as what it will probably mutate with. The exact strain of flu that's the most airborne, the most vicious, and that has the best chance that is most closely related to to be able to combine DNA. And they mix it up, and then it gets worse. Then it gets worse. So it's a million to 1 conservatively that they would ship it to all these facilities now that happened. It's a million and one that would be the exact right way to mutate it, and then it's a million and one. Get ready for this. That they wouldn't radiate it when this vaccine called to be radiated. They kill it. They breed up the flu virus, then they radiate it. They ship it out. They didn't radiate it. It was live because it had to continue its mutation. And they say that it could even mutate inside the human body, and that if they gave it to thousands of people, that's guaranteed. Now now I mean, let's say it's not a1000000 to 1. Let's say it's a1000 to 1 that they ship it out to all these facilities and tell them to mix it at the exact, you know, same combination. That it takes this. And then they don't radiate it. But by the grace of God are probably some good guys in an intelligence agency. This stuff doesn't happen by accident. There's good guys in government everywhere. They do test it on ferrets at a subcontractor. And then for weeks, they've been trying to get the story out and warning people, and it finally broke. We're gonna be all over this story, ladies and gentlemen. Do you understand what I just covered? According to a compiled translation from Czech newspaper stories, the media over there is asking tough questions about whether the contamination was part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic. Mainstream news is saying this, But not our media. It's too controlled. Was it just a criminal negligence or was it an attempt to provoke pan using vaccination against flu to spread the disease as happened with the anti b hepatitis vaccination with vaccines containing HIV virus in the US. Remember when that happened? Oh, that was an accident too, though, with the gay men in New York with the just so happened that HIV was contaminated in the in the in the hepatitis b shot, and they used gay men because they're vectors having 100 of sexual partners. It was just an accident. The perfect vector was injected. And then this is from the major Czechoslovakian paper. And then cash for vaccines against h five n one, which Baxter develops. How could on earth a virus as h five n one come to the ordinary flu vaccines? Don't they follow even basic precautions in the American pharma companies? The fact that Baxter mixed the deadly h five n one virus with a mix of h three n two seasonal flu viruses, it was a whole cocktail to see what it would mutate with, is the smoking gun. The h five n one virus on its own has killed 100 of people, but it's less airborne and more restricted in cases with which it is spread. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which as anyone knows are super airborne and easily spread, the effect is a potent super airborne, super deadly bioweapon. Me say that again. The effect is a potent, super airborne, super deadly biological weapon. Your family gets this at least. If there's 6 of you, 4 of you are dead. You're dead. That you go in the ground. Do you understand? In the ground. Do you understand that? You understand that police that wanna laugh about this show or or military people or government people? There's no more time to laugh. You understand? If you don't want the globalist to kill you and kill me and kill all of us deader than a hammer, you better start waking up to who's running things, Jack. As the Canadian press article explains, while h five n one doesn't easily infect people, h three n two viruses do. If someone exposed to a mixture of the 2 have been simultaneously infected with both strains, he or she may have served as an incubator for a hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people. There can be little doubt, therefore, that this was a deliberate attempt to weaponize h five n one viruses to its most potent, extreme, and distributed via conventional flu vaccines to the population who would then infect others to a devastating degree as the disease went airborne. Speaker 1: And that's Speaker 0: how the globalists love it. They love compartmentalized operations where they use regular distribution systems like the water or the air to hit you and hit you hard. Now I got doctor Paul Craig Roberts on the collapsing economy, and, you know, he said that he was gonna vote for Obama because Obama had to be repudiated because Bush had to be repudiated. But now he's written articles saying it looks like Obama is gonna be worse than Bush. Former head of policy department of the treasury, he is coming up at the 8 after next hour. But then I am gonna in the hour after that with a guest and into the 4th hour, take your calls on this weaponized bird flu being mixed with vaccines to be shipped out across the world and reading literally, I probably read, I don't know, scanned through 20, 30 articles, all mainstream news last night. And they're saying, you know, with scientists and others saying, incredible. I mean, they ship it out when it's not involved with with, you know, a human flu vaccine to these places to be mixed with a whole different variety of human flus. It's mixed the it's a specific way that they, design it so that it will mix with those, and then they kept it live and didn't radiate it after that. I mean, come on. That's like hitting a bullet with a bullet, then hitting a bullet with another bullet, then hitting another bullet with another bullet. All with the same bullet. It is absolute fraud. This is just amazing. And we've got Mike Adams, the health ranger, coming up next Monday to talk about this on the show. I'm gonna be covering this tomorrow and Sunday. Mike Adams said a story. Vaccines as biological weapons, live avian flu virus placed in Baxter vaccine materials sent to 18 countries. And he says here in the article at at the end of it, he said previously, he didn't really believe that it was really population control, the poisons and the food and water and vaccines. But now he basically agrees with us. This is on purpose. And, you know, it's hard to come to that realization. Believe me. I've gone through that same process myself. Remember 4 years ago when through FedEx, a company mailed out bird flu to a bunch of laboratories, but then it got caught by researchers before they mixed it with the flu? And I forgot to Google that last night. I've gotta remember the exact headline from 4 years ago. It was, no. No. The delivery truck was in a wreck. That's why it came out. Delivery truck, just say just say vaccine firm accidentally ships out avian flu or delivery truck accident avian flu. See, I mean, it just goes on and on and on. And then all these companies said, why were you mailing us without us even asking weaponized bird flu and not labeling it? They're just mailing it out everywhere. And then they say, oh, it's an accident. We got a oh, oh, oh. I mean, it's just disgusting. Remember the White House? Ari Fleischer, the press secretary admitted. We have the press conference. Google, White House admits, White House press secretary admits White House on Cipro on September 11th, and then and then the anthrax shows up 3 and a half weeks later. And then all these Bush enemies get it. Then they say somebody made it in a bathtub. It's not weaponized. Then it turns out it's the most weaponized ever. A Fort Detrick AIM strain, super weaponized, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars of equipment to put it together. Super deadly. On and on and on, and you just add all of this together. And we're just sitting here waiting for him to release this on us. Yes. They they accidentally shipped out the deadly bird flu that'll kill humans deader than a hammer, and it gets mixed with the regular a whole grouping of regular, hyper airborne flu viruses, and then they don't radiate it and start shipping it out. And one research lab decided to test it, And it killed the ferrets, and they said, what on earth? And now we know, ladies and gentlemen. Now we know. Big Brother, Speaker 4: mainstream media, government cover ups. You want answers? Well, so does he. He's Alex Jones on the GCN Radio Network. And now live from Austin, Texas, Alex Jones. Speaker 0: Headline, accidental contamination of vaccine with live avian flu virus virtually impossible. Baxter product contained live bird flu virus headline. The Canadian press in the Toronto sun. We're gonna go over this more after doctor Paulkirk Roberts leaves us in about 30 minutes. I wanna get this clear. A lot of people have criticized me for not getting more into bird flu here on the show Because you'll see all these mainstream news articles with headlines like, scientist says, billions will die from bird flu. You know, we we've seen that headline from all these scientists. And then you look at bird flu, it's very hard for humans to get it. When humans do get it, it's normally around fowl. It's around geese, that are in, you know, pinned in areas. It is around chickens. It's around ducks, And it's killed 100 and 100 of people, and the media kept hyping it. Why? Why? Why? And then a lot of researchers began looking at the different mutations of it and appeared as if not just bird flu, different variants of it, but also SARS has been biologically manipulated artificially. So, yes, bird flu itself in its current form has been hyped, but mixing it with thousands and thousands of ampoules of vaccine with other live viruses, other regular flu viruses is the perfect mainstream news is the perfect way for it to mutate into a airborne stronger variety of the bird flu. And look, folks, this is only one issue of many. They keep all these genetic engineering facilities going where their cross species splicing humans and and cows and humans and pigs and humans and spiders and goats and spiders and jellyfish with monkeys. If you don't believe me, just Google it. It's mainstream news. And I've had top genetic engineers on. Top. They say it gives rise to super viruses and mutations and mutations of bacteria and microplasms, and that it's already caused problems. And genetically engineered crops that are cross species chimeras are already jumping into other varieties of plant life that they're, related to in open air. And there's been German studies and Chinese studies and British studies fungus pesticide of it. They just boost it several thousand times with a fungus pesticide that is produced by the plant itself by genetic engineering. So you're not just eating corn. You're eating corn that's now part of a toxic, fungus. And so it's in the pollen and kills the bees. It's meant so other animals can't eat it. It's meant so other bugs I mean, it just goes on and on. Texas company, Protegent. Open air plants, hundreds of varieties of pharmacological corn. Amongst them that have the HIV virus shell where the plant grew the basic virus makeup so it could be extracted for research. That was 6 years ago. They had guys in space suits in the the Dakotas and Texas, literally helicopters and guys in space suits, burning and destroying the fields. What are these people doing? Doctorjonesnaturals.com. My father over 2 years ago said, this is deep state. He helped set up the supplements 12 years ago. He's super smart. He taught me so much of what I know growing up. Super smart man. My mother wanted to retire. He went and got a warehouse in in Round Rock, North Austin. He kept producing all the great products that he designed for us. And sure enough, 3 months ago, they said all your products you sell here, he's only taking a small percentage of. We're not gonna sell those anymore because the CRO and the court, fine. They kicked his products out of our warehouse, and and he he Speaker 1: got them. Speaker 0: So all these products you couldn't Speaker 1: get in for were Speaker 0: store.com anymore. There's so many of them there at drjonesandackles.com, and that's just the inside baseball. So that's a separate company. It's not going anywhere right now unless we have nuclear war with the Russians next week. They're shipping. They got good quality. They got good customer service. And wherever we go in the future, whatever happens, that's my dad's company, and he's gonna be a sponsor for the future. So great products. And at this critical time, like, Travis sitting on a letter at the Alamo for aid, I'm asking all of you to mark it down, to remember the site, to make it your home page, and and to go there and get next level foundational energy. Get the concentrated fiber, caps that are the essence of the of the best seeds, not just the wheatgrass, but a bunch of others that do incredible things for your whole gut and regularity in your immune system and resetting your gut. It's all there. Some of the products are 40% off. Kava Chill, natural relaxation, it's amazing. Rocket Rest, incredible natural sleep aid, top brain, incredible nootropic. People take it. So this is the best product you got. All the Nano Silver products, drjonesnaturals.com.drjonesnaturals.com. My dad's a target of these people of the deep state. They've sued him. They've attacked him. Like they said, well, leave your family alone. Just do what you say. My my mother told me, as I told you, 6 months ago, and she's not a she's not a fire breather. She's not a battle axe, but she's a historian and really smart and taught me a lot. And she said, you know what the Spartan said about their warriors when they went out to battle. And I said, yeah. I'll come home with your shields are on. She said and my dad and her just said, this is BS. We don't care what they do to us. We don't want you altering course because of threats against us and all the harassment, and my dad deposed 10 times and all the rest of it, and all the money he spent battling. And they just said, son, never compromise on what you're doing. We're so proud of you.

Dr. Jones' Naturals - The Best Dietary Supplements, Super Silver Natural supplements and oral care products for health and wellness by Dr. Jones. Shop Super Silver, Super Blue, Brain Health, Immune Support & more. drjonesnaturals.com

@gregreese — Greg Reese

Posted - June 29, 2024 at 3:42 PM

Saved - June 30, 2024 at 12:17 AM

@gregreese - Greg Reese

FEMA Camps for American Dissidents https://t.co/W8WSOvUy2g

Video Transcript AI Summary

The United States has a history of operating Native American concentration camps, imprisoning Japanese Americans, and forcing civilians into camps. Alex Jones warns of a plan to condition people to accept mass incarceration. FEMA has allegedly built concentration camps for millions of Americans. The Patriot Act and other laws have granted the government power to declare martial law. During COVID, healthy people were locked in camps based on faulty tests. Prison camps are being constructed worldwide to target those deemed a threat.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The United States operated Native American concentration camps in the 18 thirties that went on for decades and later evolved into reservations. During World War 2, the US imprisoned Japanese Americans. About a 1000 indigenous Aleuts of Alaska were forced into camps as their homes were burned to the ground so that invading Japanese forces could not use them. After the war, the United States seized Okinawan homes and burned them to the ground to make way for military bases, forcing 300, 000 civilians into concentration camps, and deliberately starved about a 1000000 Germans to death in prison camps. The subversive activities control act of 1950 led to the construction of concentration camps meant to hold American dissidents. In 1961, the US forced 8, 000, 000 South Vietnamese civilians into prison camps to deprive the Vietcong of any potential support. Starting back in the late nineties, Alex Jones has been releasing films warning that people are being conditioned to accept seeing their neighbors rounded up and thrown in prison camps, such as the WTO protests, where 100 of protesters were arrested and thrown into jail. The 2004 Republican National Convention, where over a 1000 protesters were arrested and sent to a makeshift prison, And in Katrina, where police went door to door confiscating guns. Speaker 1: The police and national guard going street by street, house to house. Sometimes entering open houses with guns drawn and instructions to disarm anyone inside. Speaker 2: You say guns guns will be taken. No 1 will Speaker 3: be able be armed. We will take all weapons. You see, for over 20 years, the Federal Emergency Management Agency has been building and constructing, maintaining concentration camps as well as the personnel to incarcerate literally tens of millions of Americans. It seems now with some of the latest developments, they are attempting in a psychological warfare program to condition and control the populace. So the populace will actually believe that all of this is needed to maintain the public safety. Speaker 2: As we in the research community say, this is a psy ops. They're preparing people for what is coming, not what is being presented today. Speaker 3: So you're saying they're preparing people to accept it with incrementalism? Speaker 2: That is correct. Like the old frog example. You know, you put the frog in the water and you just gradually continue to raise the heat on the water until the frog is cooked. Speaker 0: After 911 came the Patriot Act, and American citizens officially became potential enemies of the state. In 2006, president Bush amended the National Defense Authorization Act to grant the president power to declare martial law. And in 2007, signed directive 51. Speaker 3: For the smallest of reasons, including in the document's own text, any incident in the world regardless of location that affects population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions can trigger at the president's will total martial Speaker 0: law. During COVID, healthy people with no symptoms were arrested and locked in prison camps because they failed a fraudulent PCR test. And if they tried to escape, their fellow prisoners reported them. Speaker 2: The second she jumped over, we all freaked out because, we we we just wanted to call, like, to let the wellness people know, let the police know. In response to their triple 0 calls, she was picked up by the police within 15 minutes and fined $5, 000. Speaker 0: Prison camps are being built all over the world, and they are for whoever the government sees as a threat to their agenda. Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Rees.

@TRobinsonNewEra — Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Posted - July 27, 2024 at 1:06 PM

Saved - August 3, 2024 at 8:29 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Britain's banned documentary - SILENCED

Video Transcript AI Summary

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his personal experience of being silenced by a gagging order after losing a court case. The video discusses the case of Bailey McLaren and Jamal, two students involved in a school incident, challenging the media's portrayal of Jamal as a victim and Bailey as a bully. Evidence is presented that contradicts the narrative, including Jamal's history of violent behavior. The speaker criticizes biased reporting by journalists like Piers Morgan and Jeremy Vine. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and Antifa activists in the case is exposed. The man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and YouTuber Dick Coughlin of promoting violence and hatred against him and his family. He questions the integrity of the legal system and expresses concern for the safety of witnesses. The video raises questions about media accountability, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The documentary you're about to watch is the most important documentary I've ever made. This story is far bigger than Tommy Robinson. This is about the weaponization and the politicization of these buildings. Court buildings across the west. The Royal Courts of Justice, ironically named. These buildings have been weaponized and used against members of the public to destroy them if they speak out. From Donald Trump to Steve Bannon, to Gert Wilders, to Marie Le Pen, to Katie Hopkins. That's what's happening. My job as a journalist, I stand for freedom of speech. I stand for freedom of press. And I failed. Because 3 years ago, when I lost a court case in here, then they banked me to the tune of £1,600,000. On a documentary, you're gonna see the entire story was a lie. Okay? I failed because I should have come out of court and I should have played you that film. Why didn't I play you that film? Because I was given a gagging order by this building, by this judge. I was silent and I allowed them to silence me because I was scared. I was scared of 2 years in prison. I was scared of the effect that solitary confinement for that length of time would have on me. I was scared of jihadi gangs in jail and I was scared of the effect it would have on my family. I failed me and I failed you. I'm not gonna fail myself again. You're now gonna watch the best citizen journalism and the most incredible expose of the establishment you've ever seen. The news is how we find out what's happening in the world. It's how we form our opinions. Opinions based on facts. That's the key. Facts. Facts should be delivered to you by journalists based on the truth. But what if what they're delivering you isn't the truth? What if it's stories that are manipulated to make you think a certain way, to follow a certain narrative, different people's agendas? And what do they do to those who go against that mainstream narrative? Those who try to expose the truth. This is a documentary about the lengths they will go to to shut down and silence anyone from bringing you, the British public, the truth. Alright. Smell me off. Obviously, not me. Speaker 1: I lost my job over this. No. I'm just kidding this. Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit. Speaker 3: He's won the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it. Speaker 2: Well, it's all very liberating. Speaker 4: This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. I'm not Speaker 5: standing. Speaker 0: You're not going, but No. Because no. Because what yous are doing, I know what yous are doing. Speaker 6: Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, aye. This is a documentary Speaker 0: about the a documentary about the unholy alliance between the media, the justice system, and our politicians. How they conspire to suppress free speech, how they pervert democracy, and how the truth and your freedoms are just 2 of the casualties. We will show how the mainstream media deceives people, how they ignore the truth, how the lies of the virtue signalling, BBC, IT Fear, and Channel 4 are all about their poisonous agenda, no matter the cost to innocent people. It's also a documentary about how an everyday playground incident between 2 young lads was spun into global news at a terrible cost to so many people, not least the 2 young lads themselves. We will show how the law is being abused, how people driven by hateful ideologies attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who dares to challenge the so called progressive, so called liberal narrative. We will show the foolishness of our fear driven political leaders who jumped on a story, took a side without knowing the truth, or worse still, knowing it but hiding it because the truth didn't fit their narrative regardless of the human cost. And we'll ask 3 important questions. Firstly, is the media accountable to anyone in any way for what they report? Years after the Levinson inquiry, has anything changed, or do they continue to act with impunity? Secondly, is our legal system still fit for purpose? We will show how lawyers who hate Britain but love jihadi warriors have weaponized the law system against us and how the legal system really only works for the rich. And finally, how do we keep our politicians accountable? If the police, the cause, and the state can silence anyone for speaking inconvenient truths, truths that may raise questions about government policy? Is the UK any different from China, Russia, or Iran in their treatment of dissidents? And, of course, for Piers Morgan, for Jeremy Fine, for the BBC ITV, and channel 4, it's a tutorial on journalism. Keep watching it. You'll learn. Our story appears to start and end in a brief playground incident at Ormondbury Community School in Huddersfield. A playground scuffle. One boy poured a bottle of water on another child. The school dealt with it and that should have been that. 3 weeks later, however, a video clip of the incident surfaced and within hours, with the help of lawyers and the ignorant rant ins of ITV's Piers Morgan and the BBC's Jeremy Vine, it was made into global news event. And the lives of so many people were turned upside down. Such playground incidents happen every day. So why was this spat between 2 boys transformed into global news? Well, one of the boys was white and the other a Syrian refugee, at which point the truth of the matter was buried beneath an avalanche of agendas and opportunism. Within hours, the race hate brigade was sharpening their blades. Speaker 7: But clearly when somebody comes from Syria fleeing Assad's regime, coming to a place like this, when they get treated that way, that's an issue, and the whole world is looking at us. Speaker 0: Where are we? We're in Almunbury. Do I say the scene of the incident? Is it a scene in it's the incident? It's the scene of the great lie. I call it the great lie because this lie was pushed around the globe. Yeah? This here is the school where the world was told a Syrian refugee was waterboarded by a racist English bully. It was in a playing field here, and do you know what? This is the first time I've been here. Because when this blew up on the news, it's a child's school. Kids are in school. I didn't come outside here. You see the scenes outside here where the imam was here with mobs of men. Yeah? Mobs of Muslim men. Extremists traveled up from London such as Ali Dua to cause a scene outside this this kids' school. Anyway, but I'm here. Why am I here? I'm here because I faced a court case. I'm being prosecuted. It's gone it's gone to the high court, and I have to prove I made a video stating that it was a lie, stating that Jamal wasn't innocent, and telling some facts about Jamal beating up girls, an instance that I've been warned about by the members of this community to tell the truth about what happened at this school. I've gotta prove it in court, so I've come to Huddersfield. I'm now gonna knock. I need to find witnesses. I've got addresses for many. I need to knock and talk to them and see who I can get to come to court to help me prove to you, the public, this is about as much as proven in court as proving to you, the British public, that I was the only journalist in the country who told the truth about what happened in this community. The story you were told. You were told a vulnerable Syrian child refugee had been bullied and waterboarded by a nasty white boy. You were told it was a racist attack. You were told of the dangers of Far Right extremism. You were invited to agree that this kind of intolerance could not be tolerated. Was he vulnerable? Was it a racist attack? Our evidence shows the answers to both these questions was no. Was the Syrian lad waterboarded? Why was this word used? What about this? No. Was that waterboarding? Take a look at this. It shows a group of non white children beating up a white girl. It went viral online, but it wasn't touched by the mainstream media. It wasn't made into a global story. Why not? Meanwhile, the usual suspects had lit the fire and were gleefully stoking the flames. Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Speaker 0: And of course, the politicians. They're always quick to jump on the bandwagon. Theresa May, Sajid Javid, Naz Shah, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill's grandson. Such moral outrage. And it's not just the media and the politicians. In today's Twitter and Facebook driven worlds where celebrities and groups compete to virtue signal, most of them driven by the warm feeling they get by expressing their moral outrage or by fear. The fear of what might happen to them if they don't. Everyone who's anyone pumped the Bailey Jamal story. Boxers, Lennox Lewis, Huddersfield Football Club, celebrities from across the globe. Let's have a look at all of the celebrities and Blue Tick Brigade who pumped the Jamal story. And here are some of the people who pumped the story you watched earlier of the white girl getting beaten up. Sadly, whether it's politicians, celebrities, or other groups, None of them are wise enough or pause long enough to ask whether they have the whole story, to check the facts, to find the truth. But why let the truth get in the way of such a good story? And this story was just too good a story. 2 lads in a playground scrap is not international news, but racist white thug water boards helpless Syrian refugee. Boom. Racism can't be tolerated. Beware of the far right. That's their kind of story. We'll hear more about the militant left later but they clearly weren't gonna miss out on this. Speaker 7: Well, we well, representing might be too harsh a word, but I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm here as as a concerned citizen. Speaker 0: Mohammed Amin Pandur, a Mufti on a mission. He rushed to Ulman Bire from his mosque in Bali, a town at the far end of the district. In fact, there's 40 mosques closer to this school. But perhaps Mufti Pandor had his own agenda. You see, his little brother, Councillor Shabir Pandor, is the leader of Kirkland East Councilman Huntsfield. And they were having some pretty bad news days at that time. By the way, Mufti Pandor, he's the same guy who ordered the Islamic mob to come to the school in Batley and demand the second of the RE teacher who showed a cartoon of Mohammed in a discussion about free speech. Speaker 7: Look look at what we do as a community, and you'll understand our stance. So what has happened is totally unacceptable. Yeah? And we have made sure that the school understands that. The teacher has been suspended. The teacher has been suspended. Speaker 0: You may recall the teacher had to flee, and he's still in hiding under police protection. Luckily, he hasn't ended up like Samuel Patti, the French teacher who's beheaded for having a similar discussion in a classroom about free speech. You see, free speech is essential for any society wishing to maintain intellectual and social progress, but not all societies are bothered about intellectual and social progress. Should we be silenced by the demands of Mufti Pandor and Sharia Law? Should we sacrifice our freedom of speech? Should we sacrifice the free and open exchange of ideas? Should we sacrifice the cultural inheritance of which we are all custodians? But back to the bad news days in Kirklees and the playground incident in 2018. There was also Kirklees counselor, Masood Ahmed. Speaker 9: I'm not aware of there's a problem at the school. That's something I obviously need to find out in terms of that there is a problem at this school, and that is something I will definitely be picking up. Speaker 0: Now some of you may remember this. Speaker 10: Michael, are you gonna explain what's gonna happen next? Right? Speaker 0: Are you being arrested? Speaker 7: You won't be arrested. Speaker 0: I am being arrested. Speaker 5: A breach of peace. Speaker 0: I'm of course. Speaker 5: Of the I'm of Speaker 7: course a breach of peace. Speaker 0: I'm being arrested. The content of what Speaker 5: you're Can Speaker 11: we just Speaker 5: say streaming The content of what I'm streaming told. I'm being Speaker 10: arrested for breach of peace. The game. I've been Speaker 0: Can you Speaker 12: just turn off your Speaker 11: life, please? Yeah. Speaker 5: Do you want to someone just What's that? Speaker 11: Can you Speaker 0: just explain it again? You want to Speaker 13: rest in suspicion Speaker 5: following the breach of the people? Speaker 0: What what does that mean? What what does that mean? At the same time as this playground spat between 2 young lads, 20 Huddersfield men were being jailed across Yorkshire at Leeds Crown Court for what would be the biggest grooming gang Britain has ever seen. Ultimately, 35 almost exclusively Muslim men would be given 380 years in prison for grooming, trafficking, and raping young children, most of whom were known to counsely Pandora's Kirklees Council. Mufti Pandor traveled for half an hour to rabble rouse a gang outside the school gates over this playground incident. When within a couple of mile radius in Batley, police have arrested a further 99 men in relation to historic sex crimes. So far 32 have been charged including 1 Ibrahim Pandor, 41 of Batley. That makes it the highest destination of grooming gang arrests anywhere in the UK. We Googled to see what Mufti Pandor has said about these grooming gang atrocities. Nothing. We Googled to see what counsel and sued Ahmed's condemnation. Nothing. In fact we can't find the condemnation from the of these brother either, Councillor Shabir Pandor, leader of the council. Just one statement from him reported in June 2019, telling the National Working Group of Child Sexual Eratiation Response Unit that his authority had moved forward. That's it. They've moved on. Never mind grooming gangs, gang rape of young children, all these men seem to be far more concerned about what happened in a playground at Ormerbury Community School or about cartoons of their prophet Mohammed. I think I now realize how difficult this is gonna be because everyone we've spoke to today, Speaker 1: they're all confirming what I Speaker 0: said was true. Everyone's confirming what Jamal was like, including school staff. But as soon as I mention this camera, as soon as I mention court, I need someone to come to court, they're just totally silent straight away. No. We no. No one can have said that. No one can have said this. You jump in. It's raining. But I'm realizing how difficult it's gonna be but I have got an idea for that now after today. So but first stop, McDonald's. Yeah? Let's go to McDonald's because I'm starving. It's been a long day. Speaker 13: Yeah. I'll see you on a YouTube. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: Nice to Speaker 13: see you. Speaker 0: Smaller in real life. Nice to see you. Speaker 5: Nice to meet Speaker 0: you, mate. Speaker 13: Carry off on your drink. Speaker 0: No. I'm fine. Thank you. Cheers, though. You're good. Yeah. Thanks, man. Oh, man. Very nice to see you. Oh, thank you, bro. Hello? Speaker 2: Steve, how Speaker 0: are you, mate? It's Tommy. How Speaker 11: are you? Speaker 0: I'm good, mate. Doing good. Bro, mate, have you still got all those hidden cameras? Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course, I have. Yeah. Speaker 0: Could I borrow them? You need Yeah. But when I say borrow them, can I borrow I'm gonna need to take them for weeks because I've got so much to do? It's a long story. I'll explain when I see you. But, I'm in a bit of a situation. I need some hidden cameras. Speaker 5: This is not a problem. I have put some kit together for you. Speaker 0: That's it. So that's the idea. The idea is I've got a friend there, secret Steve, who has all sorts of cameras, yeah. He's a he's a private investigator. I need to show the public everything I've heard today. I need the public to hear and know the truth. I need them to know how much they've been lied to by the media about what happened in this town. And, the only way, unfortunately, the only way I'm gonna be able to do that is with hidden cameras. Because today, I've heard the truth, but I need everyone of you to know the truth, and everyone's too scared. That's why I said Project Fear. Everyone is too scared to speak the truth or to come to court. So I'm gonna end up getting I'm gonna end up getting hammered in court. The whole world told I've lied when I haven't. I was the only journalist in the UK who told the truth. So we need to prove it. So we'll shoot down the motorway now. We'll go get these hidden cameras. These are all so this is a tie. There's a camera in that. That's the camera. Mad, isn't it? There's a camera there. You've got everything here. Cameras, glasses. I don't wear glasses. That's gonna be awkward. That's the bottom of a cup coffee cup. So you put that on the bottom of the coffee cup. I feel like James Bond. This today, that's the camera. I'll have to take this off, but it doesn't matter because apparently this records all the audio, records everything. That's the camera and I feel a little bit dirty doing this. But it is the only way I'm gonna get people to speak. And then I need you to hear what I hear. Speaker 1: The idea that people would move over the streets looking for him was appalling. The fact that the video itself, although it showed the accumulation of things that built up to that, did not deserve what happened to him or to anybody else in that situation. We knew that I'm afraid the media, I call it a perfect storm. I was getting, emails from Pakistan, from Australia, from America telling me to resign. So it went worldwide, and I'm afraid I came into teaching to help poor people, and they got me today. I've got a problem here. I lost my job over this. And as a result, the council has told me that I cannot speak to anybody ever about it. So unfortunately When you asked to go over to me about anything? I was there when it happened. I was there when I dealt with all the situation. And then, Ofsted came, then Trevor wasn't there anymore. That's that's all I can say. Well, I can't get a job. So that's where it's left me. And I can live with that, but barely only 15. I'm not with her. That's different. Speaker 11: It's got a Speaker 1: pretty good man. It's a young man with No. No. If I do, Speaker 5: I think Speaker 0: you get Speaker 1: myself into Speaker 11: real trouble. No. Okay. Speaker 1: I thought really serious trouble. Legal trouble because partly cancels You signed an NDA or something? Correct. So they've said, you can't be split free. I'm not with the NDA so you keep the pension. So you get pension? Yeah. Fucking hell, bro. I have to be very careful about what I say to it. I'm not allowed to talk about it. I really am not. So I can't discuss it. I can't discuss it with the media. I always wanted to have my say against it, which I've never had, Never been allowed to have. Never be allowed to say goodbye to my staff. They're just told to leave. So I've worked there nearly 30 years. Actually, 20 years and never got a card, never got a goodbye. This whole thing was just used. The whole thing was used. Yes. Could push him in over there. And hijacked and by by by the right of it politic I'm quite a political person by the right and the left. It was hijacked and spun all out of the position and now we've got problems. That's interesting. What? I thought she looked 1 more meters of all the silence. What a mess. It is a it is a mess, but but it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy for Bailey. I'm not sure, Jamar, will get anything out of this ever in his life, positive out of it either. Necessarily, might have he might have got a few, silver coins from Julius, but that's about it. You know, that that's it. The thing is that they haven't 6 weeks, prior or weeks prior. And then in the same day at the same time, if you look for the to go fund me up, the site was released. Yeah. Now you see your full picture together? Speaker 0: Already, that's gold. Yeah. I know that's gold. All I hope, I hope that's recorded. I can't turn a computer on. So I just pray that's got the audio and the visual and it's not pointing up there that we've got it because that was the head teacher and that's the first visit. And I know this is gonna work. So I now need I know just off that, I didn't think he'd talk before he shut the door on my face. He didn't. He seemed like he wanted to talk. There's a lot he wants to say. So but, yeah, let's go. Next stretch. Yeah? It's exciting. Was there a racism problem in the school and Speaker 5: Well, no. I don't I don't I don't think there was. Speaker 0: What about other Syrian refugees? Like, do you think what happened to Jamal in the school was because he was a Syrian refugee? Speaker 5: No. Not at all. I told you before That that would have happened Speaker 1: No, ma'am. Speaker 5: If the child was white, big, blue, whatever color. Speaker 0: They're all scared. Speaker 5: Yeah. A lot of careers on there. I work for operation service now. Speaker 0: You do now? Speaker 5: Yeah. So I don't know where I stand with it. If I go, I could lose the job. Speaker 1: What about if Speaker 0: you know, I don't want You Speaker 5: know what someone said? I work Speaker 0: I get it, bro. Speaker 5: I work for probation service now. You see, if Speaker 0: I didn't work for You see, if you're someone Speaker 5: If I didn't if I didn't work for the fucking public sector no more, I'd say, god, they can go fuck themselves. They can't. You know what I mean? Speaker 0: So they seem to be pretty keen on these NDAs. Speaker 1: Who is that? Speaker 5: That is counsel. But I can't disclose that with you. That's what? Lords. I'm saying I can't disclose it because I Yes. Assigned it. Speaker 1: That incident was talked about by Theresa May at a g twenty summit. He asked her a question about it. We were then offsteaded by 5 of the top inspectors in the country. We'd only send 1 registered inspector. We have the head of safeguarding. We are I had a member speaking to me about it. If you want my opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shut that school. Get up there and get rid of this. Speaker 0: Get rid of the problem. Speaker 1: Over to the Bailey. Speaker 0: Correct. Over to Mal. Speaker 11: Correct. Get rid Speaker 1: of the problem. Over to Mal. Correct. Get rid of the problem. Get rid of it. But why do you think that is? Do you think because I'm not Jamal. Jamal, because he come here 2 years ago. I've got so many negative things said about it now for so many people. Well, I mean, so many. You in a few before. We have non Syrian children. Non families. Yep. We're not one issue. Speaker 0: Well, Well, my my view is Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: That you won't get much of an answer out of all because you work there and it's bound by various confidentiality. So Speaker 1: Long disclosure of business. Speaker 0: Do you get paid as well? Not been to me. Speaker 1: They all have. Every teacher got paid not to tell the truth. Speaker 0: But the head teacher can't even talk about Jamelle at all. Speaker 2: No. No. They cannot. Speaker 1: Both, can you? Shouldn't it? Speaker 0: Well, if you work it out, it must be a good one. Speaker 1: Mustn't it? Did Speaker 0: you work Speaker 1: there as well? Speaker 2: No. I was the chair of goodness there. But so it's it's not What my issue Speaker 0: is is Speaker 2: you're not gonna get anywhere. Speaker 1: No. No. No. Yeah. Speaker 2: And Rob wouldn't talk to you either. So it's Speaker 0: They're trying to Speaker 12: It's pointless me even giving you I told but Speaker 0: I told the truth. Your contact details Okay. Wouldn't work with us. Speaker 1: I told the truth about Speaker 0: what happened that day. Speaker 10: I am not even arguing. Speaker 1: His life was destroyed. Speaker 2: Well, that's not fair either, is it? Speaker 0: As a racist bully, and he won't. And he wasn't. I know. And Speaker 2: I both know that. Speaker 14: Truth is just Speaker 1: How much money is it? Speaker 5: I can't see the figure because if I see the figure, it goes out. Speaker 1: Because, mate 18. 18. Speaker 0: I've just found out. Well, the head teacher's told us already that he was blackmailed and threatened. I've just found out of Kumar. He was paid £18,000. Paid he said, I can't take I signed. I I was paid. So paid what? He was paid money by the local council, so he can't tell the truth about what's going on in that school. Then they've they've give everyone non disclosure agreements from school staff to governors to and and Paul Coomar to get £18,000. He's not even involved. If you live here, if you live in this area, your tax money he's got 18 grand what must the head teacher have got? He must have got 6 figures. How much money have they spent on this lie? We put in a freedom of information request to Kirklees Council to find out exactly how much they had spent of taxpayers' money to get the silence of their staff. They didn't answer the first request. They avoided the second. Only when we sent them legal letters because they have to, by law, answer these questions, did we get our answer. They had spent over a quarter of £1,000,000. £275,000 of taxpayers' money was spent making people remain silent. But they've they've they've spent money silencing everybody, so no one can ever this is for ever, once you sign that agreement, no one can ever tell the truth While they push this manufactured lie that destroyed lives, schools, communities, everyone's life. I've seen life after life after life, person after person's life destroyed, while the council, your local council, Kirkley's council, give away 100 of £1,000 to make sure that the truth can never be told. I can't believe it. I knew from day dot, I asked myself the question, when this was blowing up and I knew the truth, I kept saying, how come no teacher is telling the truth? If all those teachers know what's going on in that school, how come none of them are coming out and saying? Well, now we know. Now the whole world's gonna know, because corporate council paid them not to. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Jamal was in India? Speaker 3: Yeah, he was in the same Speaker 11: well. What was his what Speaker 0: was Jamal's attitude about in school? Speaker 3: He wasn't very nice. He called female teachers bitches. He just didn't really have respect for the female students, to be honest. Yeah. Basically, we were in a p lesson, and we were playing hockey with a teacher called Mr. Cattell. And I had taken the hockey puck off of Jamal, because I was on the other team, and sent it to the other side of the room where my team mates were. And I then turned around and just felt a really sharp pain in my back, and he'd swung the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it. Speaker 0: Is there do you think there's any way that could have been an accident? Speaker 3: No. It knocked me to my knees. Speaker 0: It knocked you to your knees. How how long have your mom been in school when this happened? Speaker 3: About 2 weeks. I've had lasting injuries from it. It's caused me to have severe pain in my top in the top of my back and, I'm on medication for the pain. Speaker 0: Still now? Speaker 1: Yeah. Did Speaker 0: Jamelle get in trouble for this? Speaker 3: Not that I'm aware of. Speaker 0: First, I wanna apologize to anyone I've been forced to record with a hidden camera. Sadly, people are terrified to tell the truth because of the potential consequences, but the truth still needs to be told. Speaker 1: Do you know if you do remember of any any incident specifically with tomorrow with those? Speaker 2: Well, do you remember that one there, it it got go with octetick, won't it? Speaker 0: Yeah. Charlie. Speaker 2: Charlie. Yeah. Speaker 1: Don't get the name there. Yeah. You must go. Lovely little girl. Yeah. Speaker 2: It just Speaker 0: wrote to him Speaker 2: of not sure to bloody nasty. No Speaker 10: he was, like, to the side of me. So he tried, like, pushing me and, like, so I quickly moved out there because obviously I knew what he would like. He would have actually hit me and stuff. Mhmm. So I moved and then he, like, moved his arms if he were gonna try and stop my face, like, back. Okay. Speaker 0: And he dropped but he did, but on that day, he spat Speaker 1: at you. What was on? Where'd the spit go? Speaker 10: Like, literally, all on me and if I'm outside and all down the school bag. Because when I went home, I told mum and mum we were disgusted in it. But the school said that that because it was outside of school time, so can't really do much about Speaker 5: it. Okay. Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit. Speaker 1: Was he? Speaker 2: Yeah. And dad. Speaker 1: 2. Speaker 2: Everybody and anybody. It does it has no respect for women at all. None. Did he even snap? No response from Speaker 11: him? No. Speaker 2: I told I told his father to all this on phone. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 4: Jamal grabbed him by his tie and was just threw him against the wall, cracked his head up and he gets back at wall and just kept throwing against the wall. This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. That's just intent to kill. Speaker 1: Were they? Speaker 10: They had, a young lad and a girl. And they were absolutely they were horrendous. The kids, they were just horrific. The the kids that they are, they used to bully the kids. Speaker 1: Oh, Jamal. Yeah. Speaker 0: See, what was Speaker 11: what Speaker 5: was Jamal like though? The dickhead. Speaker 1: Was he? Speaker 5: He spent he he came to isolation a few times. He want he want perfect child? Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 5: He was the same. Well, you know what Joe Biden did, don't you? Speaker 0: He was in isolation? Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: That's what he's in other times. Speaker 0: Was he? Speaker 11: Yeah. What Speaker 1: was he like, though? Speaker 5: Troublesome, Charles. Yeah. He's a makeup fucking star, he's Speaker 0: He used to make up stories. Speaker 5: Yeah. At at one stage, I think you see something to do with your sister. Somebody said something to his sister that I was in isolation. I just go come out and he was waiting outside isolation. I wanted to be the girl or for someone. I can't can't remember. Speaker 0: He want to be here. Yeah. Speaker 5: They did ask someone to his sister. Just one second. I'm sorry. Speaker 1: Yeah. No problem. Speaker 5: Yeah. No problem. Well, you you you you want you want he used to lie lie a lot. Speaker 0: But this whole thing was built with what he said. And if you lied a lot, light, it's a big problem. Speaker 1: What was that over? Speaker 5: Him. Oh, no. It's whatever. Oh, no. It's whatever. Or we want this or not. Did you Speaker 0: like that with lots of kids? Not really. No. Just certain kids? Speaker 11: Yeah. I would Speaker 0: say I'm like, he's got an insurance group. So he thought he could? Yeah. Yeah. So he just randomly attacked you? Yeah. Yeah. What about, your mom your mom just sank about he puts anything between his hands? Speaker 15: Oh, yeah. It was a compass. Speaker 16: I remembered it yesterday. It was just as you went. Speaker 15: It was a compass. He got he got a compass, and he was going around like when Speaker 0: he got to be Speaker 15: with proper hearted to be able to be believed in everything. And I think it was miss Ennis that proper gave him a top telling off Speaker 0: Okay. You know, you said so so say say like that instant there. You said some girl said something to my sister, and he walked away outside to beat her up. Well there are testimonies from several children who alleged they were being bullied by him. Younger children. Little girls. Mostly girls. Is Jamal the innocent victim? You've been told. I gathered these testimonies over just a few hours filming in Huddersfield. I could have carried on. Speaker 5: Yeah. I was waiting outside my pleasure to be the yellow. Speaker 0: And about the noise. Yeah. Speaker 5: I'll say about Juwani used to tell fibs. There was several times he got investigated, and it just fucking turned out to be fucking lies. Speaker 0: The fact he always lied is a big point. The fact that you know that the police the the school investigated incidents where he said things happened Yeah. And they turned out to be made up. Yeah. Speaker 5: It was thieves. They couldn't have happened. It could happen because of of the one. The child were even in school that he accused. Speaker 1: I can remember. Oh my god. Yeah. Oh my god. Speaker 5: So I'm sure he accused us another guy called Jaden. I can't remember his last name. Speaker 0: Called what? Speaker 5: Jaden. Speaker 0: Jaden. Speaker 5: He accused he accused Jaden or someone. I'm a mean miss any investigative of complex. Speaker 2: Not very likable, really. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 2: You know, about what we're gonna do to sisters and what have you bury aunt's office. Speaker 1: I'm toddlers. Speaker 2: But not a very nice boss. Speaker 1: When you say what are Speaker 0: you gonna do to your sisters? Speaker 2: Well, I told Betty, wouldn't it? Speaker 0: Tell Betty is your baby sister? Mhmm. Alright. And I'd Speaker 1: try to argue that it was in the public's interest for them to know the truth about Jamelle. Speaker 11: I know. Speaker 10: Yeah. Unless they They were just retaliating. Yeah. Speaker 2: You know, which most people know is from the side in the world's history. Speaker 0: Yeah. Jamelle seems like every kid I spoke to that he attacked was younger. Speaker 5: Yeah. Bullock. Speaker 0: Jamelle. Hey, Jamelle. Yeah. Yes. That's what I'm fine now. Yeah. Speaker 5: That's what I remember. He said he would have stabbed him or something with a science or something. I remember. He said, yeah. So he goes to come and then what he's saying now. Speaker 0: Because that thing of him getting caught with a knife in school. It's like, what? What with a knife Speaker 1: and screwdriver? Bailey gets his tail thrown in Speaker 0: a bottle of water. Speaker 5: Yeah. What the fuck? Speaker 0: Surely he gets Speaker 5: a statement on that? Speaker 0: No. Because it there's things missing. Speaker 1: But I've got I've got his dad mentioned it in Speaker 0: the minutes in the meeting. His dad mentioned it in the meeting with the school. His dad mentioned about them catching him with a knife and a screwdriver. His dad Speaker 5: his dad bought it up. I've got it I've Speaker 0: got it in black and white. Speaker 5: Yeah. You got good case there? Speaker 1: I've got Speaker 0: I've got it. Yeah. He got caught with a knife. They they can't deny it. You see, the truth was there for the media. It was there for celebrities and politicians to see. They could have told you the truth at the time before some of you gave over a £160,000 of your money to the poor victim, Jamal. Well, not so poor anymore. But none of this was true. A key part of this case is that I reported what I was told. Before my involvement in this story, a mother went online and said her daughter had been attacked by Jamal. I contacted that mother. She sent me images of her daughter. She said her little daughter was beaten by 3 Muslim girls and that Jamal jumped in and bit her daughter on the head. She sent me the images of the bite marks on her daughter's head. I said, can I speak to you? Can I interview you? I rang the mother, but the child was too scared to talk to me. Speaker 2: Too scared? Speaker 0: No. No. Everyone's scared. A girl went online and said that she had been attacked by Jamal. Both of these victims deleted their comments why. Both of these victims had gone online and reported this before my involvement at all in this case. I simply reported what they were saying. We revisited the mother's house to try and get confirmation as to why she backtracked on the story she had put out and the story she had told me. Speaker 10: I got car if you're driving. Tony Robinson's there. Speaker 0: Tell her not to worry, don't worry. Speaker 12: He said don't worry. Yeah. Speaker 0: So when you when you put online about Jamelle, what what what happened? Like what did you What happened, what was the response to that? Speaker 5: What do you mean? Speaker 0: I mean, did you receive did you receive Speaker 14: I don't receive threats. Yeah, I did. Speaker 1: What sort Speaker 0: of threats? Speaker 5: We all thought. All thought. Don't let all thought. And I'm just Speaker 0: because I'm trying to understand this. Is that, and is that because and it because what I've what I've looked at and then because Jamelle's solicitors are using a statement that you made saying that, Jamelle had nothing to do with it. But was that I'm asking is that was that in response to the re reflects your seat that you received? Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 1: It was. Okay. Speaker 5: Liar. Straight. Is this a symbol just a liar? Jamal telling fibs all the time. There's several times investigated. Fucking who found out that he's talking fucking shit. Speaker 11: I don't Speaker 0: think the whole but then I read Jamal reading reading was slightly a prepared statement on the news. Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules. Speaker 18: He used to break rule Speaker 5: all the time. Yeah. He used to lie. He used to lie a lot. He lied several times. He lied he lied several times. I caught him several times lying. Speaker 0: He's suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. And I'm finding out after teacher after teacher after teacher he's far worse than what I said. Far worse. I mean, like, far worse. He was put up on a pedestal by every single media outlet, politicians, footballers, celebrities, boxers, everybody. They're suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. All I'm knocking on the door and asking teacher after teacher after teacher is what was Jamal like? And it's just flowing. It's just boom. And he was far worse than anything I said. Far worse. I find it insane because no there is no way that all the things I'm now finding out, the neither journalists has found this out. They must have known what it was like because it hasn't been hard. Speaker 10: The Isle of Portrait, Port Bailey, the the spin. He was Speaker 1: and that Jamal was an innocent woman in London too. He wasn't. Speaker 10: Not far from that. Speaker 0: So you were told Bailey was a bully and he was a racist. He wasn't a saint in school, he'd be the 1st to admit that, but he wasn't a bully or a racist. Police concluded there was nothing racist about the scuffle, yet you were told he was vermin. You were told he needed to be dealt with. He was vilified by the media, by politicians, and by celebrities. Bailey a bully, Bailey a racist. Not according to his teachers and other children. Not according to his head teacher of his school. Who is this? He was Speaker 1: a 15 year old kid Yeah. And it it would have been, could be, have a great future. He's a very articulate lad. He's got a lot of issue about justice. Yeah. I think, you know, I could've seen him in a row or something like like that because he has that in him. Really? Yeah. And he would stand up for his peers in school where he felt things were. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 11: You know, he would do that. I just wanna tell the truth Speaker 1: about Vaden. Well His life was destroyed. Speaker 2: Well, that's not Speaker 1: fair either, is it? Speaker 2: As a racist bully, and he won. Speaker 13: And he wasn't. Speaker 0: I know. And I both Speaker 1: know that. I know. Unfortunately, the Speaker 0: truth is just I know. I know. But Bailey didn't even get to sit his GCSEs because of this campaign of hate, this perversion of the truth. What about Jamal's broken arm? Which the world was told was because of bullying. That was a like. School incident reports record that he had been punching a much younger child in the face while holding him in a headlock, and he was pushed off him, fell, and broke his arm. The police considered the incident to have been dealt with it properly. Speaker 5: You were picking you were picking I think you picked I've got an old somebody pushed him to get him off. Speaker 10: He started calling me my white fat bitch and stuff, and then he like Is Speaker 0: that what you're my mate? Speaker 11: I'm a Speaker 10: white fat bitch. Speaker 0: White fat bitch. Speaker 10: And then, I went up to him, and then he like, I took I took the bottle and then he put me in a headlock, and then my mate pushed him off me. And I believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock. Speaker 11: And I Speaker 0: believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock? Yeah. So he he physically assaulted you? Yeah. Speaker 5: You said Speaker 0: he called you mama white bitch. Speaker 10: Yeah. Is Speaker 0: that the sort of terminology he uses a lot? Yeah. Speaker 1: There's all sorts of misconceptions like the fact that he had a broken arm. Speaker 0: Oh, I've got 2 independent witnesses now. Speaker 1: He he had a year 8 kid. And another kid in year 11 stepped in and said, what are you doing? Pushed him over. Poked him off. Speaker 0: Who he had in the headlock? Speaker 4: It was must have been just start of year 11, put this kid in a headlock. One of my friends, one of my friends, didn't like how he was behaving, grabbed him and just threw him off him. Like anyone do break up a fight, they just, like, throw him off him, but this wasn't a fight. This was an all out brawl, one-sided, completely one-sided, because this kid had no match against Jamal, just threw him off him and he landed on the curb. Speaker 0: How did was he did? Jamal was in year 11? Speaker 4: Yeah. Half half the size of Jamal, easily. Speaker 0: Okay. You know, I know he was 12 and Jamal was 15. Mhmm. Speaker 4: But he was like, kind of like half size ish, kind of like, up to shoulders kind of thing. Yeah. But he still had no match against him, And my friend just grabbed him, threw him off him, he landed on a curb, and that was like it. Speaker 0: So I've read it reported in by Jeremy Biden and in the newspapers that that was an incident of Jamelle being bullied. Speaker 4: No. Exact opposite. He was bullying this kid. Speaker 1: So you see people thought that was all part of it. Speaker 0: But that's do you know why somebody destroyed it Speaker 1: for all your broken arm. Speaker 0: But do you know why they Speaker 11: do you know Speaker 1: why they thought it was part of it? Speaker 0: Because the solicitor said it was. Speaker 1: No. Well, it's not it's not true. I'm telling you, it's not true. I could even name it I won't. But I could name the child in year 8 that he did it to. Speaker 11: And I Speaker 1: could name the child in year 11 that stepped in. Speaker 0: So someone stepped in? Speaker 1: Because basically, school school is a pretty good place. Kids have good values. So if you saw a bigger kid, you'd see a little kid. He said, oh, he stepped in and said, what are you doing? Yeah. And we even had it where Speaker 0: Do you know what he said to the year 8 kid? No. Called his mom on white slag? Speaker 1: Yes. Now I've got that on camera, isn't it? Now you say it. Yes. He would have done that, and that would have been incredibly provocative for them. Speaker 0: Even in his statement to court, Jamal claims they were forced to relocate from Huddersfield for their own safety to a different part of the country. Really? Because the records say there was no most racial motivation and there was no threat at home. That's what the records say. And this is why the authorities, they refused to move them. And while all this was going on, records also show that his dad Jihad Yeah, his dad's name is Jihad. He'd threatened to kill himself if the rest of his family weren't brought in from Syria. It's not surprising that some authorities expressed concerns that Jihad Hijazi was trying to manipulate the system to get what he wanted, including their housing. You were not told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You weren't told anything approaching the truth by the mainstream media. And in Jihad's holy war statement to the court, Jihad said that he wished he had died in the war with his family, rather than go through what happened at Almanbury Community School. Really? He wished he was dead and all his family were dead rather than go through this school playground instant. Listen to the clip again. Listen to what Bailey's saying. He's asking Jamal repeatedly. What are you saying now? It wasn't a random attack. It wasn't a racist attack. Bailey didn't threaten to stab Jamal. The playground incident was not the beginning of the story. It was a culmination of many events. Not least, it was a response to Jamal's alleged threats to rape Bailey's younger sisters. They're about 9 years old at the time of this. So how's it going at that school when you saw the portrayal of what happened with Bailey and him. Because he was painted as this innocent little kid. Speaker 10: He was an innocent. Speaker 11: He's out Speaker 10: in there for a while. He's out in there. I used to see him bully Bailey's little sisters Speaker 0: and stuff. Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Hope his parents take action. Right? Never mind anything else. What what what what are you producing here with this vermin doing what he's doing here? Speaker 16: That's not Britain. That's not what Speaker 8: we do as a country. Speaker 0: You can hear him there describe Bailey as vermin. Words are important when you're on a daytime platform and and people listen to what you say. What do you do to Vernon? You exterminate. You kill it. Low life, called him a thug. But worst of all, he demanded severe retribution against this child. At the same time as this, Jeremy Vine was reporting. He didn't tell people the bully's name, although he was finding it hard not to name a child. Instead he told his followers where they could find that name. Now this is a direct response of both of your reporting, because when you reported, you can follow the timeline and the repercussions of what that bore. What I've done here, in 2018 there's a charity called Tell Mama that records Muslim hate incidents. Even though they've been in the past penalised for exaggerating the figures, let's go, let's work off their figures. They say there are over a 1,000 hate instances with 325 of them being online. Some of them are Islamophobic, which means criticizing Islam as well. Here, I've printed a piece of paper for each one of those hate incidents. 327 hate incidents online against the entire Muslim community of the UK in 2018. The 325 Islamophobic comments, they're the ones you read about on the news every day. They're the ones people are in jail for. They're the hate incidents the media keeps shoving down your throat. So each piece of paper here represents a hate comment aimed at a child after a playground dispute. I want to read these now, and peers, you demanded severe retribution, that's what you demanded against this child. Let's see if you're happy with some of this. I pray someone rapes you and your whole family while you watch. Fuck your mother. Fuck your love. The Syrians will rape your family. If I saw you, I would rape you to death. You'll be raped by the Volusian group. I hope your mother will not be racist when she is raped. I'm going to bum your nan alive then dead her again. And the threats of rape, all of these threats of rape, imagine being these children, imagine being a 15 year old child living in Huddersfield with your little sisters. Muslim men are jailed in the biggest scandal in the history of our country for mass rapes in that town. And then you're receiving and you're reading these messages. You're going to die, you're going to fucking die, we're going to strangle your mum, your dad, your friends. I'll kill your whole family. I can't wait to find you so I can slit your throat. You're the person who should be killed in those ISIS videos. You, your parents and your whole family have to be burned. Do heaven a favor of fucking off yourself. Looking at you makes me want to commit suicide. Go commit suicide your your oxygen thief. Jump off a bridge bro. Do humans a favor and kill yourself. We don't want you and you don't belong in this world. Again, imagine being that child reading them. Piers. Is that severe enough for you? This is a mental health record for Bailey McLaren. Bailey was referred to Luton CAMS by Luton and Dunstable Psychiatry Liaison on the 31st December 2018. Reason patient involved in incident in Huddersfield and has been relocated to Luton with family. Patient unable to cope with not returning home and has taken an overdose. So this lie, this narrative, this agenda which comes before anything else by the politicians, by the media that was pumped. This child, it doesn't matter. His life didn't matter. You know if he killed himself, no one would have cared. We wouldn't have heard condemnation from any of the politicians or from any of the media. No one cared. Because everyone from start to finish in this story is collateral damage so long as they have the narrative. And peers, you have a son, you have children. Demanding severe retribution against a child for a school playground dispute is unforgivable. You sit there and you preach. You preach against us. You make your accusations against me. Never have I labelled Muslim children as vermin. Never have I demanded my followers to commit severe retribution against anybody. And this is what the media, the politicians, and the celebrities created, aided and abetted by the left wing activism and the selective indignation of Islam. Hypocrites out there might say, who cares? That's what he deserved, right? Imagine for one moment if I had incited violence against young Muslim lad in the reversal of this situation. And you see, in a district where a generation of young girls have been raped, these threats are far from empty. What do you think, if you were working in the school at that time, what do you think what the media done? Speaker 5: I think the media fucking blew out of fucking proportion of what the fucking world body got off. Speaker 0: I know. But in the media run that Jamal was being bullied, Speaker 5: like You see, he used to complain that he used to be bullied. There was a there was another, I think, Kirklees Kirklees guy that came that Jamal that Jamal said somebody bought a knife or something? I think that that be that be that that should be on record. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think when we we we we have to get I think it were a lot of bollocks. Speaker 0: I'm I'm gathering that by reading the school records. They made accusations and then when they're investigated. Speaker 5: Yeah. And there were a lot of bollocks. It lied. Speaker 0: Yeah. Now ITV, Piers Morgan. You used your platform to incite hatred of a young child. No time for facts or the inconvenient truth. Surely you must have known the truth because within a few hours of the story breaking, I was receiving dozens of messages from parents, pupils and staff saying there was much more to the story than met the eye. So I did what any journalist could have done, should have done. I asked questions. Were you just being lazy? Was it willful blindness? Or are you just incompetent peers? And the BBC's Jeremy Vine, to you personally, was it clinical cowardice? After all, you didn't reveal the white boy's name. You just told everyone where to find it on Twitter. Were you afraid of being sued? Although it wouldn't have been the BBC licence fee payers picking up your legal bills, would it? Or was this your Pontius Pilate moment? Condemning a child whilst washing your hands of any responsibility? Because that's what you did and you didn't seek the truth either. Piers, Jeremy, your lazy inept reporting was not without consequence as we will see. You incited hatred, you succeeded. And that's contempt. Your actions, not Bailey's, led to Bailey and his family being driven from their home in the middle of the night. Like the very refugees you claim you care about. The hate you incited was off the scale. Then when machetes had arrived at the school, gangs were roaming the streets looking for bait. West Yorkshire police told Bailey's mum that terrorism threat had been raised to writ. They had intelligence of people coming from Bradford to get Bailey and his family. Rather than deal with the threat, they moved Bailey and his family to a place of safety. So whilst one child had the support of the whole country, had the support of the prime minister, Sajid Javid, the local football club. Everyone rallying behind this child, £160,000 donated to him. The other child in this incident, his family were driven from their home. Fret. Groups of men looking for him, ready to commit violence against him. And the police the police stopped their mom. So the police took the family. The police went and got the family to get them out of their house through imminent danger, and they were taking them to relocate them here. Let's have a look. The night in. This is the accommodation that Bailey's mother with 2 9 year old sisters and children were being relocated to. This one star hotel where rooms are rented by the hour next door to a brothel. The imam who brought a mob of men up to the school, he has 3 mosques within a stone's throw of where we're standing now. Bailey's mother, through her sense, looked up this hotel, saw it was owned by Muslims, read this read the reviews that it's a prostitute racket drug hole, and got out of the police meat wagon with her children to take them to safety herself. But this is where Kirklees Council were housing those children and that family. This is the most Muslim populated area of Leeds. That family were taken to so called safety, yeah, Surrounded by mosques in what is a Muslim ghetto. Yeah? Which is why I'm getting bibbed. I'm gonna get some cause a scene now. We went to see from neighbors what it was like at the time of the incident. Speaker 16: I think it was a a BMW Speaker 15: the fire down the house. Speaker 1: God. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: So it was Speaker 16: it was meant to shoot, Speaker 5: the 7 Speaker 0: To shoot the mum? Speaker 16: The mum. The 7 2, to the it's Speaker 0: Well, they come outside and under there. It's shouting and screaming. Shout and screaming. Speaker 10: Well, I Speaker 3: saw the video because the neighbor had shared it. And then I saw in the Yorkshire live, them making Bailey out to be really horrible, and that Jamal was a poor little victim, and it it wound me up. So I commented on it. The victim wasn't a victim. He hit me in the back with a hockey stick. And then within the space of 2 hours, I had about 250 comments saying that I was lying, that I must have been excluded from the school because I'm a liar. Just horrible comments like that. None of them believe in me. Speaker 0: And did you take this did you take the comment down? Speaker 3: Yeah. I didn't want to, but my mom was worried for repercussions, so she asked me to take it down so I did. Speaker 0: This is the area that Kirklees Council thought it was the right place to send a child and his family, who were wanted at the time, the main imam outside their school with mobs of Muslim men looking for them, and this is where they decided to send them. They basically dropped them in their backyard. That's what they were doing. This is the hotel. This is, I believe, a 4 star hotel. It's totally full of illegal immigrants. This is across the country. So the point to make is that illegal immigrants come here, young fine age men, not families, not children, and this is where council would help them. Let's have a look. Hello, boys. Hello. Speaker 5: How are you doing? Speaker 0: Can I do you mind if I ask, what what country are you from, though? Speaker 1: I I do not know speak English. Speaker 0: You do speak English. I do. This is what Speaker 13: country are you from? Mine Speaker 0: yeah. Iran? Yeah. Iran. Okay. Speaker 13: Yeah. Iran. Speaker 0: Kurdistan. Iran. Okay. Nice call, man. I'm just seeing. Is the hotel full? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Full. Enjoying it here? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Nice food. Speaker 0: Nice hotel. Nice food? Speaker 13: Yeah. Healthy food. Speaker 0: Healthy food. It looks like a nice hotel. Yeah. How many people are in here? Speaker 13: I think there's 200. Speaker 0: 200? Lots of children? Speaker 13: So my iPhone, I think it has a little children. Speaker 0: No children? Speaker 13: Oh, my mom's children. No. Speaker 0: Not many children. But it's a nice hotel. Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Speaker 0: Nice hotel. It is a nice hotel. And if if you look at if you look at where the other family were being housed in Beeston and you compare it to this 4 star 4 star hotel, nice food as our friend says. Speaker 1: Healthy food. Speaker 0: Healthy food. Speaker 11: Yeah. Alright. Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Hi. How you doing? Speaker 1: Hey. Do you want to come back in? Speaker 0: Yeah. We're off now, mate. We're only we're only we're only we're done now. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 11: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you know what they have in here? They have a full time doctor and nurses. Full time, stationed in there. Speaker 13: In, buddy. Speaker 0: Full time. So you know when you come my dad tried to get a doctor's appointment earlier. Couldn't get one. Full time. Full time. Full time. Speaker 1: You're very bad. Speaker 0: The food's bad? Yeah. The food's bad? Yeah. Is it free? Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's free. Speaker 5: They called our school. Soon as the media media and all that died, they sent in chief inspectors chief inspectors of fucking off state. We knew they're gonna fail and every fucking thing they can think of. Speaker 1: I have goofiness, There's a lot more changes. All of that and yesterday. And, you know, they're only in the bank, but it was never picked up. Speaker 0: Apart from my reporting, there was not a single media statement given the other side of this story. The staff knew. Other pupils knew. They could've exposed the lie. Why didn't they? Speaker 1: The incident I always quote the incident. Yeah. The incident has reoccurred. It's come to my door. They said you can't talk about it because you've got an undistclosure agreement. They're not satisfactory. So that was the reason they triggered it. Speaker 0: They were even not free to tell you the truth or they were terrified of the consequences. And that's for so called journalists. Some can't find the truth, some won't tell the truth, and some they're afraid of the truth. But me, as a journalist, it's my job to present you the truth. Speaker 1: If you want my honest opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shoot that school. Get up there and get rid of this. Speaker 0: You see, when the media and politicians decide to kill a story, when they decide to hide the truth from you, they'll do whatever it takes. They shut down the school. It's gone. Everyone lost their jobs. You see, once this Live Our Racist attack had gone global, the truth would never be allowed to come out. The real truth, that a young Syrian refugee was struggling to fit into his new environment was problematic. His allegedly abusive and violent conduct towards teachers and children was allowed to run unchecked. Why? Did the school authorities turn a blind eye rather than be accused of victimizing the boy, of being racist towards him? They stayed silent. The truth may have triggered accusations of racism or sparked discussion about immigration policies. The challenges of achieving the successful integration of migrants we welcome into United Kingdom, and the need to take those challenges seriously. You see, Jamal was one of 20,000 Syrian refugees who come to the UK as part of the United Nations resettlement program. The government could not allow their policies to be examined and the consequences and their incompetence to be exposed. And if you don't think the government is incompetent, you ain't been paying attention to anything. Priti Patel's been talking tough, really tough on controlling our borders for years. And yet we have boatloads of illegal economic migrants being escorted across the English Channel and put into these luxury accommodation at your expense. This ineptitude does nothing for the refugees who come here legally, who we welcome into England, refugees who are trying to integrate and make a new life here. And who was the community's rage directed at? All Syrian refugees. That's who. When in fact, there are many families of Syrian refugees in the area, we're told, all of them delightful, working hard to settle and integrate into the country they can now call home. I spoke to multiple refugee families. In the school, Gremlin, my children. No. Any Gremlin. No problems with your children? No. That's it. And you've had a you've had a good experience in the school? Speaker 10: I used to have 2 friends and they don't Bali and they don't care where from country I can't move anything. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 10: And when I spoke English, like, I was we was about 1 month we've been in here, and I used to not speak English very much. So they used to tell me how to speak all that thing. And now I'm in year 8, and I know how to speak English. And I made more friends, and now I am fine. Speaker 0: And you're fine? And then no problems? Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules. Speaker 0: Who told Jamal to go on camera and say this? Who arranged the media tour? Who encouraged him to take legal action? He was originally going to sue the school for not looking after him and then decided to sue me instead. Who told him to put this in his statement to the High Court? You see, Jamal doesn't like to break the school rules. Here's the problem. This is his behavior record. Almost a 100 codes for bad behavior. Truancy, verbal abuse to teachers, physical violence towards pupils, and lying. Yeah, there's plenty for lying. You see, I haven't got all of Jamal's school records. Large sections of documents I was given were blacked out. We tried to get access but we weren't allowed. And the lawyers wrote to the court to explain they had misplaced documentation. And finally, as you can hear, the lawyers decided what they were gonna allow me to see. Whilst I was preparing my defense, Jamal's lawyers decided what I could see. And this global news story wasn't an accident. It was all carefully planned. You see, the day before the video went viral, a GoFundMe page was set up for Jamal and the video went viral the day after a criminal record check come back on Jamal. Why would his lawyers do a criminal record check? Well, they had to make sure this was financially beneficial exercise. Wasn't going to be derailed by an unhelpful pass. 15 Rold Jamal, his record was clean by the way. Mohammed Akanji, the jihadist lawyer of choice, was immediately on the global media blitz. Speaker 19: Listen. I'm very conned to himself. I'm after him for my own reason. Speaker 8: Right. Okay. Nothing sinister though, is it? Speaker 19: Oh, fuck. No. No. Journalistic. Oh, journalistic. Well, that's good. Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No. Speaker 19: No. Fucking totally journalistic. I wanna get all the background on him. You reckon he Yeah. You reckon he was a member of that? Speaker 0: Yeah. Al and Midrgharun are a prescribed terrorist organization. Almost 60% of terrorists in British prisons are ex members of this organization. They kill. They murder. They slaughter. That is the organization that Mohammed Khanji and his brother were allegedly, according to this, top mainstream Muslim British journalist who are members of it. How does a Syrian lad find himself working with the jihadist lawyer of choice before this video even went out? Before anyone has seen this viral video. Within 2 weeks, the lawyers have been made the beneficiaries of the GoFundMe page of £160,000. A plan to sue the school? That's put on hold. And a plan to sue, moi, for libel was launched. What riches had these lawyers promised Jamal and his family? School records were edited. Migration Yorkshire clamored to make this playground fight about race and hate. They contacted the Home Office as soon as they heard about this playground fight. Yeah. The home office, a playground scuffle. Why are they contacting the home office instantly? Someone went further. You see, we had this school incident report analyzed by a graphologist. Someone who analyzes handwriting. It appears to show that a second person with very different handwriting doctored the report to allege that Bailey had threatened to stab Jamal. Even though all the witness reports mentioned there was only one teacher there, so only one teacher could have done an instant report. So, with the careful planning, the jihadist favorite lawyer and the enthusiastic support of some useful idiots, it was possible for the lies to go round the world twice before the truth had had a chance to put his pants on. I now need to mention other repercussions of what happened in Ormondbury. I was being sued for reporting the things that were said to me about Jamau. I had to defend myself. The judges already already ruled that I was not allowed to argue. It was in the public's interest for people to hear a different perspective of Jamal. I had to prove that the information reported to me was true. That's not the kind of burden placed on Piers Morgan or Jeremy Vine. Piers can describe Bailey as vermin without being held to account. And who is behind propagating this deception and the lawsuit against me? You see, this is where we get to meet the most sinister part of the unholy alliance. All sorts of people are helping out, but leading the posse from the front is the jihadist lawyer of choice. He represented Shamina Begman, you know the jihadi terrorist that's out in Syria. He represented, I think, Michael Adeballajo, Lee Rigby's killer. I think he's even had to change his name because he's got such a terrible track record. So this is the lawyer who's suing me and who the media celebrated that he had served me papers even though I wasn't in the country. If you're pillaged, if you've plundered, if you've raped and you're beheaded, and you say you've done it in the name of Islam, well these are the lawyers for you. The lawyers who stepped forward for ISIS by Shmina Begum, who've been fighting to get her back into our country. Who defended Michael Adeballaju who beheaded Lee Rigby. This is Mohammed Akanji and his colleague, Faruk Bajwa, who's been banned from claiming legal aid. Yeah. Banned from claiming legal aid for putting in fraudulent expense claims. Let me rewind a bit. Let's go back a few weeks. There's an important piece of background information to this. Speaker 15: Don't know the full ins and outs of it, but, basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yep. To be honest, I kind of haven't, and Antifa Dundee. The base he says are planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson, because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens, make ketchup bombs and stuff. And allegedly, instead, wherever the foot, these petrol bonds through your door when he sleeps. They say they're also friends with a few MPs. Speaker 0: Now at the heightened tensions with multiple osmond warnings, they now take back the radar phone, the one option we have to go direct to the police, and they are removing it at this current moment. Speaker 1: Where are you from? I'm from Speaker 0: So, look, what did you just say, basically, the the the radar phone or whatever it is? Yes. Yes. The phone, the emergency phone that you Will will be taking that back. You'll be taking that back. Yeah. But those those phones are They're used for a aren't even for real. Like, so so when there's a heightened threat and people have come to the house and the address has been put out where my kids are, you're then gonna take the panic phone back. It's Christmas 2018. The police come to my family's home to tell me that people in Antifa, file a violent and extremist organisation, are planning to kill me and my family. See who were the first to comment on this video? Well, Mohammed Akanji of Farooq Bazrunko, of course, the jihadists lawyers of choice, but also Mike Stoodsbury, an independent journalist, an Antifa activist. So the jihadist lawyers knew Antifa were planning to kill me, then actually commented on the video of the Ozmen warning. You see, what happened next is interesting, although not interesting to the solicitors regulation authority or the law society. The people who should be interested in the integrity of our lawyers. Speaker 16: It will be live streamed. I'm not in charge of the Speaker 4: filming or anything like that. Speaker 16: That's, down to the Speaker 4: the guys over here. Speaker 16: And you literally know we wanted to do this, so we thought, what mug can we probably do with a creep for this? Speaker 0: So 2 lawyers who know Antifa are planning to kill me seek out an Antifa extremist, hire him for one day, just one day, and send him to live stream the servant of papers to my home, my family's home. Papers which had already been served by the way, with a gang. When my wife and children were there, when they knew I was abroad, lawyers commissioned the Antifa Extremist to broadcast my home address in order, as they put it, to cause a spectacle. Speaker 18: The law firm or the lawyer who has been, you know, sort of taking the lead on the Tommy case wanted to make sure, doubly sure that that, a, Tommy got the, the the letter. It actually went out 2 2 two different ways, and he wanted to make a bit of a spectacle out of it. This this is all very they're very amusing. Speaker 0: A group supported by Mike Stitchbury came to the home that my wife and children were in on a Sunday afternoon when I wasn't even in the country. So let's have a look at Mike Stitchbury, who calls himself a journalist, who promoted this event, who shared it and encouraged it, who found it amusing that my wife was so scared she had to ring the police. My wife has been sat down and told in her home that Antifa are planning to kill her. They're planning to kill our family and harm our family. She's been told that she may get acid in her face. Well, how do you think she felt on a Sunday afternoon whilst my children are playing outside on their bikes? To be told that Antifa were on their way to our home. Let's have a look at Mike Stuxbury, the man that sent them. Here he is self admitting that he is part of Antifa. Here he is promoting violence against his opposition. Punch them, punch them, punch them. Here he is hoping that buses full of Antifa get shipped in to smash people's skulls in. Here he is calling for white genocide. Mike Stitchby is an extremist. He's a far left extremist who currently is playing a victim. He encouraged people to come and he sent people and was part of an organization that communicated together, to send people to the home where my wife and children were when I wasn't there. He even crowdfunded to support them in their action. Speaker 18: He, you know, he was looking at various people and eventually he sort of came on to Dick Coughlin. Dick Coughlin? I can't say it properly. Who is a a a YouTuber who has made videos about Tommy for, god, almost 10 years, I think, who's a who's a real critic. He's a I don't know if you've checked him out, but he's a he's a funny guy. Speaker 5: Check out. Yeah. Speaker 18: He's, sort of, you know, got red hair, x he calls you know, he's he's an ex crackhead, basically. Speaker 0: And who is this antique extremist hired to come to my kids' home? Keep watching. I went up to where and they said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it. And later that night, the Antifa Extremists hired by their lawyers had a message for me and my children. Speaker 16: And on that note, see, Speaker 0: on that on the happy note. Speaker 6: Oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate. Speaker 0: So look at the man that they sent. The man that you can see, the Muslim lawyer, handed privileged documentation giving this man my children's home address. That's what he's done. Fully aware of the serious danger my family are in, and he hands them my children's address. They then come to my children's home, my wife gets a phone call, my children run off the drive, they lock themselves in the house, they ring emergency, the emergency 999 call for the police to come, they press panic buttons, they need support because Antifa are coming. They came, they told the Muslim lawyer, he's fully aware they're coming to live stream where my family are. They live stream and dox the name of the road. They dox the door number. I went up to where and I'm and I said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it. The man's specifically chosen. He was chosen. He says in his own video. Speaker 16: The lawyer in this case was a guy called Mohammed Sunimi Akundra who works for a solicitors in London called, I shit you not, Farooq Bajwa and Co, solicitors of London. I get asked by this guy that, they've decided that they're going to Tommy Robinson is going to be served legal papers, so he can be sued by this family. And they asked, me, do I want to be the one to go along to serve legal documents? Speaker 0: Let's have a look at who Dick Coughlin is. Let's have a look at some of the things he said. Here he is promoting hatred against black people. Serious, this is a crime. The comments he makes are a crime. Here he is promoting hatred against Pakistanis. Here he is singing a song promoting anti semitism, singing a song about lampshades being made out of Jewish people's skin from the hollow. Yeah. 3rd black, 3rd black, you're a good killer kite. We're white, far right, and we're gonna have a fight. We're in the A self confessed racist anti semitic crackhead was sent to my children's property. He talked about raping my wife in her skull socket. He talked about my children being fed for a meat winder. He talked about burning my house down and whilst masturbating with my family in it. Now other than to terrorize my wife and children, why would any sane person do this? It worked, okay. Tipped off by a friend who saw the gang on livestream approaching, my ex wife hit the panic button and barricaded herself and our children in a bedroom. The police thankfully responded in time. And these are exactly the same tactics being used against the unbelievably courageous children in Ombre. Threats of violence and rape against children who are willing to stand with me in defence of the truth at the High Court of London. The video release, media, GoFundMe, Antifa, it all happened at the same time. It was coordinated, and it was about hate and making money. And how that far left activist, who appears to be an antisemitic, Jew hating, black hating racist, came to my home with his gang and threatened to kill my children. These lawyers, the mainstream media, they don't care about refugees. They don't care about Jamelle. They don't care about the truth. Say that bloke who made the video saying Speaker 1: he's gonna kill the kids. Yeah. Speaker 0: Can you if you didn't do it, I know 100% give a statement. I know. I was there. Speaker 5: Okay. Give a Speaker 0: statement about that. She complained about it. She contacted Paul, remember, it would have been the liaison officer at the time, to Okay. Ask if he was arrested. I found out his address, and I gave you all the information for him. So even now Right. Say now, looking at that, can he be arrested now then? Speaker 15: I don't know what happened with Speaker 20: the previous report because when we search on our system that we currently use Speaker 0: You probably got very good. Speaker 20: See any crime report that was linked to it. Speaker 0: You see, the next day, knowing I've been provoked with threats against my ex wife and my children, no doubt thinking they would catch me conspiring to commit violence and lock me up on a conspiracy charge. Here, outside my ex wife's house, men in a car that has never been registered, check the registration plate. So presumably from the security services, we've listing devices recording what's being said in my home. The involvement of the security services may explain why Dick Coughlin, the man who publicly threatened to murder my children, has never even been spoken to or arrested despite my wife's complaints. What are you doing? Is there any reason the back of your glove? There's no Speaker 5: one in the back of your glove. Speaker 0: So what are you doing? We're not here. Anything to do with you. What are you doing now? Well, who what do you think we're doing? I think you're starting to do me. Speaker 15: No. No. It's a pissy. Speaker 0: Who's this with? What are you doing? And there is someone in the back. I'm at Speaker 11: Can you Speaker 1: tell me what you're doing now? Speaker 0: Because essentially, I've got threats against me. I'm not. Yeah? So what are you doing? I don't know what you're doing, bro. That's all everyone knows what you're doing. I've got police officers sat with a recording in a recording van. In the back of this van is a recording station. I'm not standing. You're not going. No. Because I no. Because what yous are doing I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. They're sat in the back of their van. This is recording devices. The whole of this back thing because he just opened up when I got him out. The whole of this back thing is recording where they're pointing it because they what this is has been a setup. These people are set these police officers are setting me Speaker 1: up. Speaker 0: They're setting me up. It's a setup. They're setting me up by sending people to my house because they think I'm gonna react and do something, and they're recording it with listening devices. We checked the vehicle registration plate outside the house on the government website and there's no such vehicle. Let's not forget the politicians are fearless leaders. It was only when I went alone to the home of self declared journalist, Mike Stuchby, to ask him why he had done what he had and why he thought it was funny to intimidate my children. Some of you may some of you may have seen that people have been outside my home. Timberland, my family. The difference is when they come to my home, 5 men come to my home. I'm on my own. I've had to move my children who are scared and upset. And people encouraged people to participate in coming to my address. One of those such people Speaker 13: who Speaker 0: It was only then that the fearless then deputy leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson, steps forwards. Ignoring reality completely. Speaker 21: Every major social media platform other than YouTube has taken down Steven Yaxley Lennon's profile because of his hateful conduct. Late on Monday night, Yaxley Lennon turned up at a journalist home banging on the doors and windows demanding to be let in. And after being escorted away by the police, he returned at 5 AM and continued his intimidation. The incident was live streamed. He later warned journalists in a YouTube video to expect a knock at the door. Does the secretary of state think that is right that YouTube and the parent company Alphabet continues to give this man a platform, sir? Speaker 0: It'd be funny, you know, if it wasn't so insidious. The hardly honorable mister Watson totally misrepresented what happened, and from behind his shield of parliamentary privilege, bravely declared but I've been terrorizing a journalist. Journalist. Stokesbury's an antifa activist who incites violence and wants to kill white people. Terrorizing. Was I terrorizing? Mister Watson bravely demanded that I'd be removed from YouTube. YouTube had now had only recently confirmed that none, not one of my videos had broken any of their stringent guidelines. And my videos hadn't broken any laws. It was clear I hadn't harassed anyone, certainly not Mike Stutchbury, if indeed he is a journalist. But none of that mattered. My wife and children left their family home that night. They never went back. Perhaps having their lives endangered by their jihadist lawyers. See my wife started legal action against Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra's firm. But Mo and Co, Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra, see they weren't so keen on facing the law as they were on abusing the law to persecute others for financial and ideological reasons. On the 31st March 2019, they promptly collapsed their law firm. They'd never be involved in the case. That's what they said. And doctor Farooq Basra, well he's no longer gonna be a lawyer. He'd been living in Pakistan. That's it. That's what they said. That's how easy it was for Mo and Co to escape justice. Interestingly, they're still signing documents on the case on the 6th June, months after saying they're not involved. Several other law firms have reported them to the Law Society, the body that is supposed to make sure lawyers behave ethically. Nothing's been done. I wonder why. In fact, all the lawyers working at Fruit Basement and Co just moved across to a new law firm called Burlington's. And guess what? Yeah. Burlington's took on Jamelle's case against me. FruitBazwa now works for Burlington's. FruitBazwa's son now works for Burlington's. Fruit Basra is Burlington's GDPR expert. Pretty ironic, no? Fruit Basra and Co leaked my children's address to an antifa activist to put it online for everyone. And if we've been stupid enough to expect more ethical behaviour from Birlingtons than from Faruk Bajwa and Mohammed Akanji, well, we'd have been disappointed. I just really, which I've been trying to do, I need all of the disclosure, which I haven't had. I haven't had a full disclosure of his school records. Speaker 12: Therefore, to make sure, that we have it, that that some documents haven't been lost in the transfer of the bathroom through Bourgeois to to Burlington's, we have done another subject access request to the council for Speaker 0: July. And how long would that and how long would the council take for that? Speaker 12: I I don't know. I I don't think they gave us time frame, did they, Speaker 11: Luke? No. No. Speaker 15: They didn't, unfortunately. So you're asking Speaker 0: so what what you're saying is you believe there may be things that I that I haven't been disclosed. You don't know how long they're gonna take, but you won't agree to an adjournment? Speaker 12: No. No. Our position is that we're not agreeing to an adjournment. Those are my instructions. Speaker 0: Because my my my concern and serious concern is the safety of the witnesses. And and it's a genuine and and if you I don't believe for 1 minute that Mohammed al Khemji or Farooq Basra give a shit about any of this or Jamelle. Yeah. I I generally don't think they do. And this is I'm Speaker 12: just gonna say Farooq Bajwa and Mohammed Dukunji have nothing to do with this case. This is my case. Speaker 0: How how how come how come how come then Speaker 12: to anybody from Fruit Bajwa Speaker 0: How come then Fruit Bajwa Speaker 12: have Burlington started with me. Speaker 0: How come Fritbajwa signed a form 3 months after he left then to do this case? Speaker 12: It's absolute it was, if if that was the case, it was before I gave the undertaking, and he wasn't involved in this case before. Speaker 0: He signed a he signed a form dated June in June. He signed a form, and the date on that form that he signed is June. He left this case in March, apparently. How come? Speaker 12: Well, I I I if you explanation as to why. I'm not quite sure what the formula is about. Speaker 0: No. You'll see it you'll see it you'll see it on my documentary. Okay so when you when you send me what you decide is relevant yeah, how am I going to know what you've cut out? Speaker 15: Well I suppose you wouldn't. Speaker 0: I wouldn't. Does that seem fair? If the info if the if the information is not relevant, then what harm could it do in me hacking it? Speaker 15: But it's not about harm Stephen, it's about privacy. Speaker 0: For the last for the last 3 days, since I gave you, since you received videos so that you become aware that I have video evidence that's going to prove my case, since that point my ex wife and my children for the last 2 days have had police at their house because they've been receiving threats. On top of that pictures of my ex wife have been put online by the same people who were in bed with Mohammed Okanji. Then 2 days ago Mohammed Okanji doxxed my mother and father's house. Last night, that house at 1 o'clock in the morning was smashed to pieces with bricks through the windows, yeah? This is all going on in the background of it. I've been trying to get my stuff ready, but just so you're aware of what's going on as to why I don't trust the words you say. When you have Farouk Basra's son working for your, working for your company and Farooq Basra is the man that sent people to threaten to kill my children, I'm wondering why in the last 48 hours or last 72 hours, since I disclosed information to you, Why why my family and loved ones have come under persecuted harm? Of which is all detailed with police records and video footage of everything that's been going on. So I'm super concerned and don't trust you or your party to decide what's relevant in this case. I don't trust you. So where, how, if this should be fair trial about getting out the truth, if that's what you're working for, you need to give me your disclosure. Instead of reviewing it and taking bits out, which is what you've already done with the school records. You'll say, because I know that's not the full school records, so and you've covered up things which, and Luke, Francesca told me, I have a recording of her telling me, that your, that Burlington's did not retract anything, redact anything, yet in court you had to admit you did. I've got the recording of that telling you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. And then in court you sit and admit that you have been redacting things. So, forgive me. It's just lie after lie. This is Burlington's lawyers losing documents that they're supposed to send to me and deleting things that they don't want me to see? Misplaced. How do you misplace documents that were electronically filed on their case management system through Basra and Co, then passed over to Berlin's? All of this is because they're sharing it. And all of this is to put pressure on me in the weeks before it. And all this, and this is a kanji, I guarantee you this is a kanji, a kanji working with resistant hay. The the account that's put put it on is is resisting hate, yeah? Resistant hate who a country hires with Dick Coughlin to send to the house before. They're like his little minis. So now he knows that it's coming, it's going to land on his lap. The whole lie that they've told, and this is the actions they use. They can't play the man so they play the kids and the family. You don't need to be scared, Sanya, because, they're doing this Speaker 10: you guys just told me he's a good boy. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know, babe. But they're purposely just doing that. But when they're doing this, they're just doing this to try and get cause me shit and make you worry. So I know it's easier said, but you don't need to worry. Yeah? They're doing this so they're doing this so that I don't beat them in court. That's why they're doing this. Yeah? The mad thing is the whole time this goes on, the media and all of the, we're the bad guys. That we've been on. But like I'm the one persecuting people or targeting them. And they're such cowards. They're such cowards, man. I just got a phone call, and they said goodbye. I'm so scared. I've told the police, but I'm so scared. Speaker 10: Yeah. Hello? Speaker 0: Jenna, who's just wrong with Spencer? Speaker 10: We don't know at the minute. Speaker 11: What are Speaker 0: the police then? Speaker 10: I'm just making a statement. Speaker 0: Okay. But just quickly, what are they what are they are they getting that account? Let's put a picture of you online. How who's who showed you that picture, Jenna? Speaker 10: It's on Twitter. Yeah. Speaker 1: Who saw it? Speaker 10: I saw it myself. Speaker 0: You saw it yourself. Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna are the police sorting out to get rid of it? Speaker 10: Yeah, they've taken the address of the Twitter person to put it out. Speaker 0: If you can say I give them 50 addresses of people who have done exactly this over the years, including the redhead man who what about the redhead bloke who friends come to kids? What do they say about that? Speaker 10: Well nothing really. Speaker 0: No? It's a crime. Do you know what I mean? If I make if I make a video threatening to kill some kids, I'll be arrested. So that the point where you need to ask them specifically and say to them you made a complaint, someone threatened to murder your children, you had to leave your home yeah, Those threats have now followed you to where you're now living. Yeah. And they're coming from the same people, the same organizations, the same people they done fuck all about last time. They didn't lick them. They didn't speak to them. They didn't. The solicitor is still acting with impunity, doing it to my mom and dad yesterday. See, you need to specifically ask them, then I want our answer, Adam. When you made a complaint against Richard Coughlin, Dick Coughlin last year, why have they not done anything? And give us and get you a follow-up and an answer as to why they haven't Speaker 15: done anything, if you can. Speaker 11: Just get Speaker 12: it up. You've got time? Speaker 0: I mean, the kids are right. Am I right that you managed to track the number? Yes. So you know who made those phone calls to her and the Speaker 14: We know where the number it came from Speaker 5: Yep. Speaker 14: And who who that phone was registered to. So that's all obviously, we cannot prove well, I I at that time, I wasn't able to prove who. I only could say where the number came from. Speaker 0: As in as in as in whose phone is? Speaker 14: Who the phone is registered to. Speaker 0: Yeah. Because because, obviously, for me, this was this was threatening phone calls a week before a high court trial trying to prevent the court trying to prevent the court to justice. How come no one's been arrested? Speaker 14: I can't see any again on the crime report. Speaker 0: If I send you evidence, which I'm going to anyway because it's all going to the judge, if I send you evidence of Mohammed Akanji doxing my mum and dad's address, if I send you evidence of criminal damage and attacks in the middle of the night at an old pensioner's old pensioner's home, and I show you evidence of pictures of my wife being put on, ex wife being put online, and my son. They've hung my 11 year old son's phone. The police were all involved. They've been threatening my 11 year old son. Yeah? This is what's going on. If I send you evidence of that, do you think you'll support an anonymity order to protect the children in this case? Speaker 15: Steven, I I I can't answer that because I don't have instructions to answer that. I don't have conduct of the matter. But what I can clarify for you is some of the issues that I can give answers on. One of those of which I heard you made reference to, Farooq's son working. He is not involved in the case in any way at all, has no access to any files whatsoever. Speaker 0: You've heard how Luke hack here. He couldn't explain why they were adapting and deleting information from documents before handing them over to me. Information I should have been given. He couldn't answer the simple question, who decides what's relevant? Unfortunately, in terms of integrity, bowlands don't appear to be any better than Fruit Bajwa and Mohammed al Kanchi. You see, I was told he'd violently attacked a girl. I was told he'd attack someone as part of a gang. And I was told he'd threaten to stab someone. In fact, Jamal would violently attack more than 1 girl and we presented the evidence to the court, including the testimony of courageous children who came to court. These children weren't Tommy Robinson fans, but they came to the high court to speak the truth. So let me just look at one of the pupils that come to court and testified. This young girl wasn't a supporter of mine, didn't support my politics, but she still came to court and testified. Let me have a look at her school record and read what her teacher says about her. Charlie is a very mature and hardworking member of the form. She has been an absolute pleasure to have in the form. She has represented the form in the school council and in various events across the school throughout the school year. She represents all that is positive and exciting about studying studying at Almunbury. Charlie is now currently studying law at university. Why would this girl lie, randomly lie, before I was involved? Why would she then travel to the high court of London and commit perjury? Speaker 11: Because Speaker 0: that is what the judge has found, that she's made it all up. And Jamal, the Syrian refugee, the one with multiple lies in his school records and behavioral discipline reads everywhere, well, he was telling the truth. That is what he found in this case. Why would a mother post images and send me those images of her daughter being black and blue? Why? For what reason? Why would the staff lie? Why would the head teacher lie? Why would every single person who was recorded covertly lie about what Jamal was like. 12 different people lying about what Jamal was like. Why? See, the judge has really helped us out here. The judge says people can lie for reasons that make no sense. Sometimes for no reason at all. He could not readily identify any explanation for why some of these people were prepared to do so and lie. He concludes the alleged assaults, they never happened at all. Despite Jamal's school record, which you've seen, the judge states the Cayman's record is overwhelmingly positive. He acknowledged Jamal has a record of lying, but decides on this occasion, it is Jamal who's telling the truth and everyone else, everyone else is lying. Really? We waited 10 weeks for this? That's your conclusion? That's the logic from the highest liable judge in our land? There was no jury. That's right. There's no jury. All of these people were lying, But Jamal, he was telling the truth. Jamal, who could only find his dad Jihad to speak for him. Not a single teacher. Not a classmate, not a friend, not a neighbor, or a support worker came to court to support Jamal's version of defense. Jamal, who said he only broke the rules a few times at school and even then it weren't his fault. His school records suggest something very different. I wanna be clear and fair to Jamal. He denies every accusation against him, completely and utterly. On the day the 5 courageous children appeared in the dock, giving testimony against Jamal. Jamal didn't even show up in court that day to face his accusers. Neither did the press. The press actually left court when the witnesses stood up to give their evidence in my defense. It's alarming to think we have this kind of intellect at the top of our judiciary. The story of these 2 children is actually a story about free speech or the death of it. It's a story about how the mainstream media is more interested in pushing an agenda than giving you balance and truth. How it continues despite Levenson to act with impunity. Is the media held to account for what they report? Have Pierce Morgan or Jeremy Vine been held to account? No. It's a story about how the the law is being manipulated and exploited by the far left and Islamists to destroy the lives of anyone who speaks out against the accepted so called progressive, so called liberal narrative. Or about the poisonous influence of Islam's Sharia law in our society. Is the law fit for purpose? No. And it's a story about our government and judiciary's disdain for free speech and the truth, and the lengths that they will go to in order to silence dissent, especially with its new and increasing powers. Is our government being held accountable for its actions? No. Is the judiciary independent of political influence? You've seen all the evidence. You decide. Whether you agree in my politics is irrelevant. When dissent is crushed, free speech dies and governments move one step closer to tyranny. The lawyers know the truth. Even Jamal's father Jihad, he knows the truth about his son. They all knew the truth and were using Jamal to further their agenda, regardless of the consequences for Jamal. They continued to pursue the case, which incidentally, has caused my divorce and bankruptcy. My ex wife had to choose between her marriage to me, and the safety of our children. I'm glad she chose our children. We're still best mates. You see, Jamal's lawyers told me very early on, if I apologized and paid them 50 grand, they'd drop their case. If you're watching this, you know the decision I made. I might apologize for reporting what I was told, for what I believed to be true, for standing up for Bailey, a young lad unjustly vilified by pretty much everyone. But in silence and dissent, are the media and our government any different to the governments they criticize so much? China, Russia, Iran. Immigration, COVID, Brexit, if it doesn't fit the narrative, you will not hear the alternative view. And where else have we seen this? Where else has the media, politicians, police, and social services hidden for truth for decades, fearful of being called racist, grooming gangs. That's where a cover up of such horrific cost to 1,000 of young girls in towns and cities across our country. And nowhere worse than under the stewardship of counselor Shabir Pandor's Kirklees Council. You see, hiding the truth doesn't protect communication. It does the total opposite. It undermines trust in public institutions. It stokes resentment and conflict in our communities. Tragically, those who lead us don't seem to have the moral clarity or courage to speak the truth. They cause the division that they're trying to prevent. People ask me, was it worth it? Yeah. It was worth it. The truth is always worth defending. I'm still here. If you were born in the United Kingdom, you've already won the lottery your life. An inheritance from our parents and grandparents of freedom, equality under English law, and democracy. If we allow ourselves to be silenced, that inheritance is rendered worthless. What legacy will we leave for the children and grandchildren who come after us? None of us can afford to let free speech die. We cannot and we will not be silenced. So you've seen. I'm being sent to jail. I'm being prosecuted for showing you the truth. Nothing else. I didn't lie. Okay? They've lied, continually lied. Now for the attorney general to bring a charge against a member of the public for contempt to court, it has to be in the public interest. I say to the attorney general, this is not the police prosecuting. In fact, the claimant in this case is not asking me to to be prosecuted. His lawyers are not asking me to be prosecuted. The Labour government's attorney general is the one attempting to send me to jail. Now for it to be in the public's interest you remember the public. You've just watched this expose. Is it in your interest to lock me up for 2 years? How can it be? Let the government know. Let the attorney general know by signing the petition at www.truthontrial.co.uk to let them know you don't support the imprisonment of journalists for reporting facts to you, the British public. Who knows what the future now holds for me? The one thing that gives me a peace of mind if I'm in prison or if even if the worst happens is knowing that my family have stability and have security. If you can support them during these times, the link is at www.helptommy.com. I really appreciate your support.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Please make sure you sign the petition to the new attorney general to put a STOP to my political prosecution. Go to http://truthontrial.co.uk

URBANSCOOP Email Marketing - urbanscoop.activehosted.com

@JD_Cashless — Ken Silva

Posted - August 21, 2024 at 3:06 PM

Saved - August 22, 2024 at 12:15 AM

@JD_Cashless - Ken Silva

The Siege at Ruby Ridge, enjoy https://t.co/VVLRttMr0Q

@ImMeme0 — I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Posted - October 10, 2024 at 7:01 PM

Saved - October 10, 2024 at 10:45 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

The TRUTH about FEMA! if this doesn’t piss you off, I don’t known what will. https://t.co/EZ0Y9Mr8uK

Video Transcript AI Summary

FEMA denied assistance to families affected by a mudslide and house flooding. An elderly man's truck, his only vehicle, was buried in mud. FEMA turned down everyone in the area, providing no assistance. The government is not there for the people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let me show you what FEMA does for you. Mudslide here. House flooded. FEMA turned this family down. This is what your government is doing for you. This ain't fake news. This ain't bullshit. This is what your government is doing. We're trying to get this elderly man's truck out. It's the only vehicle he has. It was buried in mud. We've got it dug out pretty much. But, yeah, this is what FEMA. FEMA turned everybody down in here. No assistance whatsoever. Speaker 1: Pay attention to your Speaker 0: government folks. Speaker 1: They ain't here for you.

@annvandersteel — Ann Vandersteel™️

Posted - October 17, 2024 at 4:41 PM

Saved - October 18, 2024 at 1:08 AM

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

Is this GIANT INSTALLATION a FEMA CAMP??? https://t.co/eJ5JjqPacQ

@clovis1931 — ⚔Dennis⚔

Posted - November 13, 2024 at 10:43 AM

Saved - November 14, 2024 at 1:25 AM

@clovis1931 - ⚔Dennis⚔

This is close-up footage of the Candler FEMA Camp in WNC posted on 11/12/24 by Americaisrising from TT. I will attach part 2. https://t.co/zxWjlSZE7f

Video Transcript AI Summary

This place is surrounded by a major hill, with only one hidden approach. I got out of the car to investigate. It seems largely unoccupied, with workers moving bags and boxes around. Meanwhile, people are living in tents, and the government has ample housing resources that remain unused. It’s perplexing that while the Department of Children and Families is removing children for inadequate housing, these resources sit idle. Claims that this housing is for FEMA workers are questionable since they’re not visible. The situation feels like a façade, with authorities offering money to demolish homes instead of helping locals. The entire setup raises concerns about who is benefiting from these resources and why they aren’t being allocated to those in need.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They have this place surrounded by, like, a major hill on all sides, and there's only one angle of approach if you don't wanna be seen by the guards. So I hopped out of the car, and we're gonna see if we can get a closer angle. And we'll try to see who's in here. Is it immigrants? I doubt it. Is it FEMA workers? Probably. Is it, victims from the hurricane? Probably not. I ain't been here a while. I haven't seen a single fucking person walk out of any of those units. It's a lot of housing. And, again, does not seem to be occupied by anyone. You see workers, like, moving around and shit, but they're just carrying bags around and stuff. Boxes, bags, whatever. I mean, call me crazy and maybe I don't understand. This might be above my pay grade, but we got people in tents getting their kits taken, and the government's got all this shit sitting here, and they can't put anybody up in it. I mean, is is it just me, or is that, like, asinine? It's for the female workers. Well, where are they? Running around, lining people up with shady subcontractors that wanna freaking take their man. Hey. Look at security. You guys suck. You should be able to see me in the tree line here. Alright. Well, I think I've debunked the whole whole. It's full of illegal aliens. That ain't true. That's not true. It's like I I really don't know what's going on, but it almost looks like it's all for sure. It's all for sure. It's just a big either they're planning something that's coming or they're, you know, they're making a a show of they're just showing up. They're just making their presence just to make it look like they're doing something when they're really not. Yet the DCF and Department of Protective Services removing children from their homes because they have inadequate housing. Meanwhile, the same establishment that's doing that has all these resources just sitting here. And I'm tired of hearing, oh, that's for the workers, FEMA and the cooks and all the people. Well, then where are they? Where are they going? They're all facilitating the, you know, redistribution of wealth, let's call it. The one who gets left. These if if if anyone's staying here and if those people are at work right now, they're not doing much to help the people of the communities that I've talked to. They're just coming around offering a weird amount of money to demolish their houses and telling them that the flood plains have changed and they can't rebuild it. So I don't know what's going on. But it is weird though that this is the only angle of approach that you can get, like, this place is on a huge hillside that you can't scale from any other direction. The entire remainder of the perimeter is like, you can't get through if you wanted to do this, and you have to hide through the woods. Who, if anyone, is utilizing all of these resources? And if no one has, then why haven't they been allocated to any of the locals? Why are families being ripped apart for inadequate housing when the government that's doing it? And, yeah, it's local. It's better than state. Whatever. It's the government. It's the establishment. It's the system. Why then, if they have all these resources, can't they help them? And what the hell is this

@clovis1931 - ⚔Dennis⚔

And here is Part 2. https://t.co/zeT4oipVZ4

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hey, how's it going? I'm just curious about the facilities back here. Are they being used? I noticed there aren't many workers coming in or out. We can't allow recording on-site, but we can answer questions. This area is for rapid response in emergencies, mainly for first responders. They stay here to rest between their duties. People think it's for housing illegals, but it's not. The workers are out doing their jobs during the day, which is why you might not see them. Thanks for the clarification. It's important to get accurate information instead of assumptions. Have a great day!

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. Here goes nothing. Let's see what they say. Hey. How's it going, guys? Just a concerned citizen. Will you guys answer a couple questions just pertaining to do you know if anyone's using those facilities back there? Yeah. Or who who's who's utilizing all those resources? We can't have recording anymore, on-site anymore. We can answer any questions that you have. We can get a supervisor and ask any questions, but we can't have recording anymore, brother. Anymore, brother. This isn't public? We do have, numbers that we can direct it to. Yeah. That that would be fantastic. I don't mean to be confrontational. I'm just brother? No. You're good. Just with all these resources back here that you they're taking people's kids away because they have inadequate Wyoming. Oh, dude. It's awesome. And and it's like, if they have all these resources back here, then you'd think that they'd be available to the American people. If it's FEMA workers, I haven't seen many workers coming in or out of them. I walked up on the hill there and got some video. But, yeah, it's just just veterans? It's kinda strange. I did. Okay. But, were you guys private security? Yeah. Yeah. Good deal. Strategic security. And, again, I don't mean any disrespect to you guys. I'm just Yeah. Yeah. No. There the problem is there's a lot of misinformation, disinformation. It is strange, though. I mean, the tornado shelters are kinda weird. So here's what it is. It's region 4, and it's rapid response. So if there's an emergency that happens to someone local, they can come here and get them in quickly. Right. It's also for safety, but people think they're all bad. Well, that's what I mean. It's people are like, oh, they're housing illegals in there. I don't think so. It's probably is FEMA workers, but if it is, doesn't seem like there's that many of them. It's Speaker 1: a safety area for first responders and search for rescue. Speaker 0: Okay. Yeah. This is where this Speaker 1: is where they stay. They sleep. We gotta protect them, make sure nobody comes in, comes out. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. What housing are you referring to? All those, emergency services trailers with the generators connected to them. Yeah. Speaker 1: That's what we're saying. Speaker 0: That's where they sleep at. Yeah. Speaker 1: So now they're out doing their jobs. Speaker 0: Right. And we Speaker 1: gotta protect it. Because they're Speaker 0: because they come from all over the country. They gotta lay their head down. Right. Right. Right. I don't I mean, people say they don't see them, but they literally shuttle buses out, like, every every day. Yeah. So they're not really here in the daytime? They're all just out there? Because I don't see them when I'm out there cutting trees. I don't you know? Speaker 1: Gotcha. Gotcha. Well, I mean, they're all all over different areas. Speaker 0: Alright. Well, thank you. I don't mean it again. You know? Put you guys on blast, but there's we need the answers rather than everyone making assumptions. Speaker 1: Agree, but, I'm good. Have a great day. Speaker 0: At least we can nail it down. Alright. Thank you, guys. I appreciate you.

@foundring1 — foundring 🇺🇸

Posted - November 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM

Saved - November 14, 2024 at 6:27 PM

@foundring1 - foundring 🇺🇸

WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT SANDY HOOK Full Documentary (reupload) https://t.co/X3VEfOQVaX

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Sandy Hook event on December 14, 2012, involved a tragic shooting at an elementary school, leading to the deaths of 26 people. In the aftermath, skepticism arose regarding the official narrative, with questions about the behavior of parents, officials, and the lack of physical evidence. Some independent journalists and researchers began investigating, suggesting that certain individuals involved were actors promoting agendas related to gun control and mental health reform. Anomalies in police reports, witness statements, and the handling of evidence further fueled speculation about the event being staged or manipulated. The documentary emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, urging viewers to question the official story and seek full disclosure of the facts surrounding Sandy Hook.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay Speaker 1: governor and I have been spoken to in in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state. Speaker 2: I hope, I hope they and I hope, the people of Newtown, don't have a crash on their head later. Speaker 3: Prior to the Sandy Hook event, Newtown Connecticut was most famously known for a 300 acre property called Fairfield Hills. Operating from 1931 to 1995, the Fairfield Hills Hospital housed the area's mentally ill and criminally insane. Uniformly connected by underground tunnels, the 16 red brick buildings was where cruel psychiatric experiments took place involving electric shock therapy, hydrotherapy, and frontal lobotomies. Mysterious deaths and suicides were also connected to this macabre facility. Because of its haunting history, the MTV series Fear used Fairfield Hills as its setting in one of its episodes. The movie Sleepers, starring Robert De Niro and Kevin Bacon, was also staged in Newtown. Passing through the fearsome tunnels underneath the hospital proved haunting for aspiring adventurers and thrill seekers. For well over 80 years, Fairfield Hills was Newtown's sole cryptic mystery. However, with the passing of the year 2012, the town of Sandy Hook located within Newtown infamously and perhaps forever replaced Fairfield Hills enigmatic nature. Everyone loves a mystery, especially the unsolved variety, but some mysteries are so far reaching as to impact 1,000, even millions of people. It was on December 14th when the impossible happened. And looking back now, perhaps it was impossible indeed. We were told that a 20 year old, so called autistic kid, with no clear motive opened up on a classroom of elementary school children, allegedly killing 21st graders, 6 adults, and himself. Only 2 women were reported to have survived their injuries, including Natalie Hammond and another woman whose identity was initially redacted. Prior to his shooting spree, Adam Lanza is said to have murdered his own mother, Nancy Lanza, in her bed. So the story goes. In the immediate aftermath, skeptics felt there was something terribly wrong with the official story and the way the media reported it, with the way the parents acted. With the way the coroner acted, with the way the neighbors acted. Speaker 4: Nobody nobody knows them, which is odd for this neighborhood. It's very odd because a lot of people in this neighborhood know each other. Speaker 3: With the way public officials act A lack of physical and video evidence also enhanced the curiosity of the skeptics. A strong public reaction quickly followed the peculiar press conferences and interviews, resulting in a few YouTube videos receiving over 10,000,000 views. As time went on, public reaction died down and the anomalous behavior was swept under the rug and forgotten. However, a few independent journalists and concerned citizens never forgot and stayed the course by deciding to investigate the event for themselves. To see truly once and for all if the event was in fact real or staged. Did the conspicuous acting of Robbie Parker, the stumbling and fumbling coroner, and the apparent walking around at the firehouse point to a sinister stage event for specific government and corporate agendas? Or were these perceivable red flags just a figment of the imagination? The following segments dealing with a variety of anomalous aspects of the Sandy Hook events, the investigation, the official report, and the people involved were contributed by independent journalists in the Sandy Hook research community. Each participant's segment is narrated in their own voice. However, they're identified only by their YouTube handle and appear in shadow. This is for two reasons. First, we stand firmly that the information we've provided is accurate and the few conclusions presented are reasonable. There are unknown thousands of people of like mind that could have presented the same information. Secondly, throughout the course of our investigation, there have been numerous attempts to derail our efforts. Most of these have been in the form of attacks on our person and have included direct threats. There is good reason to protect our identities. Ultimately, the viewer's focus should be on the information and not the presenter. Speaker 5: Shakespeare wrote, all the world's a stage. After the Sandy Hook event, the stage was set for the parents of the alleged victims to promote gun control, mental health checks, far out school security measures, and changes to school curriculums, all the while collecting 100 of 1,000 of dollars through government grants and donations. Some actors on this stage are literally just that, actors. Some are entertainers, and some are connected to groups who would benefit from this agenda. Let's take a look at a few examples. Francine Lobos Wheeler, mother of alleged victim, Ben Wheeler, is a former personal assistant to the finance chairwoman of the Democratic Committee, Maureen White. Both Maureen White and her husband, Steven Ratner, are members of the Council on Foreign Relations, and Ratner is known to have, quote, ruffled feathers with gun control advocate Michael Bloomberg, unquote, according to The New York Times. Francine is an actor and a singer who has performed such amazing hits as jumping to conclusions, Nicky Nicky knock knock, and I Can't Tie My Shoes. Speaker 6: I tell you all in earnest. I don't have to. Speaker 5: She also starred in the animated porn, Mutant Aliens, in 2001 as the voice of Josie. Her husband, David, is also an actor. He ironically starred in the dark gun film, Faithful, in 2,001. Both can be seen lobbying for gun control in various mainstream media interviews. In fact, Francine became the first person other than Obama or vice president Biden to deliver the White House's weekly address. Speaker 7: As you've probably noticed, I'm not the president. I'm just a citizen. And as a citizen, I'm here at the White House. Speaker 5: Mark Barton, parent of alleged victim, Daniel Barton, is a lifelong entertainer, composer, and musician. As shown on the white house dot gov website, Barton leads policy and outreach efforts for Sandy Hook Promise, an organization that is committed to affecting policy in the areas of mental health, gun access, enhanced school security, and the reduction of firearm magazines. Nicole Hockley, mother of Dylan, graduated from Trinity College where she majored in English and theater. She has publicly admitted regret of not continuing her acting and directing career. Perhaps with Sandy Hook, she got her shot. Jimmy Green, father of Anna Marquez Green, is an entertainer and musician. Both he and his wife, Nelba Marquez Green, are strong advocates for gun control. Scarlett Lewis, mother of Jesse Lewis, is pushing school curriculums with a new age type of cognitive training. In pursuit of this, she is joined by a former CIA agent, Christopher Cook, as well as Barack Obama's sister, Maya Soetoro. She is seen practicing this technique in front of an oversized Newtown choose love banner. Her communications degree is no doubt handy at speaking events. She appears to revel in the reaction to her preposterous and frankly unbelievable stories of Jesse mystically signaling her from beyond the grave, a medicine show to forward her school curriculum agenda. Speaker 6: I feel him all around me all the time. I knew in my heart that Jesse had done something brave by running into the line of fire, trying to save his friends, which he was successful. I don't know when Jesse had written it, but it was shortly before he died. And it says, nurturing, healing, love. And 2 days before he had died, he had drawn a picture of an angel standing in front of what is obviously a bad man. I feel like Jesse was born brave. Jesse was £11 when he was born. And I remember going to the nursery, and all the nurses were gathered around the window taking pictures. And I walked up and I said, what are you taking pictures of? And they said, there's this enormous baby that's crawled at almost out of his bassinet. And that was Jesse. Speaker 5: Michelle and Bob Gay, Alyssa and Robbie Parker, Cindy and Mark Mattioli, Krista and Rich Rickos, all parents of the alleged victims have teamed up with Safe and Sound Security. Claiming to keep kids safe, Safe and Sound Security has partnered with navigate prepared, a big brother like security system that surveils entire schools with 360 degree video feeds of classrooms, utility closets, and hallways. In addition to schools, Navigate also monitors government buildings such as a town hall and library at Michelle Gay's hometown in Massachusetts. As founder of Safe and Sound Security, Michelle Gay has promoted this Orwellian school security system throughout the US. Navigate has even donated a system in honor of Michelle Gay's alleged daughter. Lenny Posner and Veronique Holler Posner are the parents of Noah. Lenny has concerned himself with people who believe Sandy Hook was a hoax. He has participated in group discussions, chats, blogs, and has talked to many researchers. In his article published by the Hartford Courant, he bashes people whom he terms conspiracy theorists and hoaxers. Lenny is the chairman and CEO of Traxswear, a company that specializes in removal of Internet slander, Internet defamation, mugshots, defamations of character, and online public records. This guy's company would come in handy to any Sandy Hook hoax perpetrators with prior convictions. He could ultimately remove any negative associations from the Internet. Could he be hanging around online bloggers and researchers for the purpose of protecting the Sandy Hook parents? His wife, Veronique Holler's angle is best described by tyranny news network. Speaker 3: You may remember Veronique Posner or Veronique Holler Posner. Her detailed memorial for Noah Posner, the son she claims to have lost, was featured by CNN's Anderson Cooper. Take some time to learn more about Veronique Holler, and you'll find she's a legal counselor for the government of Switzerland. You can reach her directly at Switzerland's embassy in Washington. How can we be certain this is the same Veronique Hohler Posner? It was widely reported that she was a nurse by profession. Get yourself a copy of the 7th annual conference of the state's parties to amended protocol 2 to the convention on prohibitions or restrictions on the use of certain conventional weapons, which may be deemed to be excessively injurious Speaker 5: or to have Speaker 3: indiscriminate effects. She's listed as a diplomatic collaborator for the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs representing Switzerland. Her real life mission to prohibit weapons mirrors her actions while engaged in a grieving mother's scam. While pretending to have lost a 6 year old child to a gun wielding madman, she said, quote, I think he had a mother who, at worst, aided and abetted him. She added, quote, I think there was gross irresponsibility. Words more fitting of an attorney than an oncology nurse. It gets much worse, though. As I said, she is only pretending to have lost a child. Following the trail of Veronique's friends and family, you arrive at Patricia Ordonez Holler. Right at the top of her Facebook photos page is the familiar face of Noah Posner in what looks like his sister and two drawings obviously made by a child of about 6. But the strange heading above the four photos reads, 10 years ago, happy birthday, Kevin. We love you. 1 of the two drawings reads, quote, happy Dirk, have a great birthday at the island. From Kevin. Examining the photo, we've all been told as of Noah, we see its EXIF date is Saturday, December 15th 20 12. Only one day after the Sandy Hook event. Isn't it more likely the photo said to be of Noah is really that of Kevin taken 10 years ago? Speaker 5: And it is confirmed despite many claiming otherwise that Veronique is in fact from Switzerland. An article from Haaretz focusing on Noah Posner dated December 28, 2012 states quote Veronique was born in Switzerland to French parents who raised her in Scarsdale, New York unquote. Now can it be considered a mere coincidence that 2 Veronique collars, both from Switzerland are calling for unconstitutional gun control measures in the US. Speaker 8: Such weapons have no place in our society. Speaker 5: Veronique's anti assault weapon stance is echoed with most of the visible Sandy Hook characters and has been shown to go to even extreme lengths as in the case of Mark Barden and his children. Speaker 9: My daughter Natalie was was interested in asking him if he could pass some kind of legislation so that the only people that had guns were military personnel and law enforcement. Speaker 5: Whether you are anti gun or pro gun is not the issue. The issue at hand is that legislation has been passed as a result of the lobbying of these parents after an event that, as we will see, may be entirely fabricated. As a result of the passing of senate bill 1160, Connecticut citizens have publicly voiced their frustrations. Speaker 10: With the smoke of 10, Speaker 11: from the ivory tower with the gold top, you decided to create me to be a felon, a class d felony. We're Speaker 4: Okay? Speaker 5: Sandy Hook characters are larger than life. They're not afraid to lobby, speak publicly, or pursue their agenda, all the while looking comfortable doing it. Sandy Hook funds reaching upwards of as much as $27,000,000 have been issued out to victim's family members. Yet, parents such as the Kowalskis are still comfortable requesting annual goals for as much as $500,000 while soliciting for these goals at public events. The information presented regarding the Sandy Hook parents is public, can be found by anyone, and is a culmination of research done by many people throughout the past 2 years. The aforementioned background information was included in this segment to arm you, the viewer with essential information to get you closer to the event. Watching the mainstream media will only give you one side of the coin, as many media pundits have claimed that the Sandy Hook characters were not actors or entertainers. Yet throughout the past 2 years, independent researchers have proved otherwise. And despite their claim that the Sandy Hook event would not define them, the Sandy Hook characters have virtually given up their day job and attained a full time lobbying position. From Delaware to Illinois to Arizona, the Sandy Hook parents have traveled the country promoting their agendas. This documentary not meant to focus on speculation, but rather focus on lesser known facts, inconsistencies and lies that the general public is unaware of. Remember when Robbie Parker walked out on stage to speak to the media the day after his daughter died? Although common sense will tell you he was acting, this documentary will not focus on pure speculation. Instead, the intention is to give you a broader background and a new perspective on the reality that Speaker 4: is Sandy Hook. Speaker 0: Hey. This is Sherry. I just have to mention this. Here's the official police report as things happened. And a trooper video of over 4 hours doesn't show any children evacuating the school. Well, I found the timeline of when they did evacuate the school of all the kids. Alright. 957. This Mcgever runs with whoever across the parking lot towards the Sandy Hook firehouse. 958. Keane arrives on the scene and assists with the evacuation of the students and teachers from Sandy Hook Elementary School to the firehouse. They started evacuating the school from the official time at 9:58. Alright. So let's see them evacuating the school. Here is that trooper, that 4 hour trooper vehicle. You can see it is parked on one side of the parking lot and it has the view all the way over. It has the time at 9:57 and even the seconds. The first thing that we should be seeing is at 9:57:40 runs with blank across the parking lot. Okay? Let's see it. What are we supposed to see at 9:57:40? We're supposed to see a running across the parking lot. Oh, content redacted. So maybe that's when they ran across the parking lot. Now within a few seconds, they're supposed to start evacuating the school. Now remember, this trooper is parked all the way on one side of the parking lot and views the parking lot the whole time. Any moment now, we should see either many many many minutes of content redacted or we should see a huge group of children coming out. Of course we need to give them time to start doing it, you know. Okay. So maybe this is when they're coming out. 10 o'clock. Teachers blank and student run across parking lot with a detective. Okay. So at 10 o'clock and 45 seconds. Okay. Let's, keep going here. We haven't seen the masses of children yet coming out. Oh, somebody else, at 10:0:1 starts helping with the evacuation of the students and the teachers. Content redacted. Now this should last quite a few minutes if they're getting the kids across. I mean there's a lot of kids to get across. Remember that one picture of FBI agent and so on running with a few kids and they were pictured right there? And the children were taken to the Sandy Hook firehouse at 10:03 Leading a group of young kids out the front at 1003. Let's go back to 1003, shall we? There's 1003. Let's see. There's 100306. Let's watch this. Video does not match the story. Children are escorted from the front of Sandy Hook. Another large group coming out. Alright. And then at 1006 so we're gonna have some children being escorted. And at 1006, the people that were in the conference room should be escorted across. And at 1007, escorts blank across. 10:07, children are escorted out of the building. 1007, children are escorted from the northeast corner. 1008, children are escorted out of the building. At 10:12 is when they bring another group of children out to the firehouse out from the gym area. And we're not seeing it. I'm not seeing the content redacted either. In other words, you know what this shows? This shows the official report does not match the video. This shows there are not masses of children that were evacuated at 10:14:59 escorts children to the firehouse. This vehicle, this police car showed all the way across. The vehicle is right there looking all the way across during the 4 hours. As you've seen, it does not match the timeline. Alright. There you go. Official story doesn't match video. Speaker 12: My nickname is Swan Song, and I am the editor of insanemedia.net. And this is the Don Hawksprung file. An online article from the Newtown B was posted December 14, 2012. In part, the article claimed to have received a quote from the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary who stated that a masked man entered the building with a gun and fired more shots than she could count. The only problem was the principal, Don Hochsprung, had allegedly died in the initial hail of gunfire. A few days later, an embarrassed and ashamed Newtown B published a retraction and apology of the anomalous article. So should we just chalk this one up to the chaos of the day and write it off as a mere mistake? Well, not so fast. While studying the anomalous article, a Bing cash date was noted. A cash date of December 13, 2012, the day before the event. A shocking discovery to say the least. But before we get our underwear in a bunch, let's see if this seemingly apparent evidence of foreknowledge is but a simple glitch in the system. Puzzled by who the author of the article actually was, as there was no name attributed, I at first assumed it could only be associate editor Shannon Hicks, since she was the first reporter from the Bee on the scene. To confirm, I contacted miss Hicks, who suggested I speak to Curtis Clark, chief editor of the Newtown Bee. Mister Clark, in turn, stated that the writer of the article was John Vauquette, a well known radio personality from Newtown and an associate editor for The Bee. Vauquette attributed the mistake to the commotion of the day. How could such a crucial misidentification be attributed to the commotion of the day when Hochsprung was a known personality in the community and even appeared in videos from the Newtown Bee in years past? Boquette's response was that the with whom he spoke, face to face, shared some of the same physical attributes as Hawksprung. How this unknown and unidentified woman who shared the same attributes as the Sandy Hook principal, who shared firsthand knowledge of the alleged shooting, and who herself claimed to be the school principal, came into contact with the Newtown Bee in the first place, is also a great mystery. But the greatest mystery of all, and perhaps the only bit of information that could make sense of this mess, is the Bing cache date of December 13th. If the cache date was found to be correct, it would be monumental as it would prove foreknowledge of the event and disprove anything Phuket and the Newtown Bee stated. And as doctor Wayne Carver so famously said, everything would come crashing down on the heads of Newtown. In an attempt to confirm the validity of the Bing cash date of December 13th, I contacted Bing. Unfortunately, they have no number to call, call, so all correspondence was done by email. After 7 months of correspondence, I finally got my answer. Leonard, a Microsoft customer support member, stated the following. I understand that you wanted to know the accuracy of the last crawl date that you were able to see from the cache page from Bing. To directly answer your question, the date setting which the web crawler shows on the cache page is accurate. Not satisfied with one response, I went for a second opinion. This time I got, Mark, thank you for getting back to us. The server cache time is accurate since it is being updated once our crawler visits a certain page. For example, our crawler visits a page today, June 3, 2013. The date reflected on its cache page will be June 3, 2013. The date will change after our web crawler visits the page again. The final icing on the cake came when I found an article entitled, Superintendent Reports on State of Schools. This article from the Newtown Bee focused on an event that occurred on December 10th, and it was also cached on December 13th, clearly making this cached date accurate. And if that cached date is accurate, then, as they say, that's where the rubber hits the road. Considering these cached dates are correct, which they most certainly are, this is Microsoft we're talking about after all. This brings up many questions. Was Don Hochsprung not supposed to die, but somehow did, and perhaps a drill gone wrong? Or was this an entirely fabricated event? A drill in which nobody died and Don Hoxsprung is somewhere alive and well. Her daughter, Erica Lafferty, after all, is comfortable making light of her mother's death as she poses with a CIA sweatshirt. I forwarded my original article to Lafferty. She never replied. Nevertheless, there are many questions, and it's about time somebody started answering. Speaker 3: Hello. My name is Peter. I'm an independent journalist. And because of that, you've probably never heard of me, but if you have come across any of my work, it's likely you found it on my YouTube channel, Tyranny News Network. Before I created that channel, I had a blog at tyranny news dot com where I began to publish articles on various social, socioeconomic, and political issues. It speaks to the success of YouTube that my blog fell far short of receiving the attention that my YouTube channel has, and attention in the form of subscribers to my channel or through whatever means has always been my goal. Attention to what? You might ask. Which I don't find offensive in the least. It demonstrates that you're thinking critically about what I'm presenting and what my motivations are. Regardless of how corny it sounds, my purpose has been to help others discover history and learn about our present society with enough raw data to form their own perspectives. The major media outlets don't provide us with unvarnished meaningful news and the result is a nation of people with very limited understanding of events taking place in their world. What little they do know is a combination of fallacies and trivial points that aren't sufficient to form a useful world view. I've been fortunate to have stumbled on to researching deep politics. So, as I see it, Sandy Hook is an issue important enough that every American should have a detailed account of the event available to them, and I mean full disclosure. That's why I'm participating in this project. I'm going to begin my segment with what some will surely call a minor issue, but I tend to measure the significance of certain evidence using an entirely different scale. I view evidence that this synchronous or seemingly coincidental is highly interesting. On the day of the Sandy Hook event, while the activities we've all seen were taking place at the primary crime scene, there was another crime scene being discovered. The investigation was said to have spread into areas near to the school, where it appears from the limited footage available that a search for suspects was taking place. Later in the day, events were taking place in New Jersey, the arrest of Ryan Lanza, for instance. But the only other officially reported crime scene besides the school itself was the Lanza residence on Yogananda Street. At the time of this production, the Lanza home was left mostly intact. There's very little that would indicate it was the scene of a horrible murder, some minor damage to the garage door, a notice posted on the door. It appears much of the furnishings are still in the home. The neighborhood is back to its pre school shooting pace, But back in December 2012, the neighborhood was a hub of activity. Residents were stopped and questioned. Yogananda Street, on which the Lances are said to have lived, had been blocked by squad cars and police tape. With the release of the final report, a number of aerial photos of the street and the Lanza home was provided. But it appears from what can be seen that the photos were taken within the span of only a few minutes, and no indication of the time of the photo series is given. But there is something vaguely interesting about one photo. This white and blue house is said to be the Lanza's. This home next door is said to be the home of the Trent Acosta family. Upon examining the driveway at the Lanza home, there doesn't appear to be any obvious signs of activity having taken place. However, when we examine the Trentacostas driveway, there appears to be tire tracks from cars that drove indiscriminately over their lawn. To help visualize the tracks, I've highlighted them. Based on what the aerial photos depict, one could draw the conclusion that they were taken later in the day or afternoon. But were there any aerial photos taken from that morning? It turns out that there's at least one. Here's a photo depicting the same general area with the Lanza home on the left and the Trent Acosta home on the right. But, oddly, the Lanza home doesn't appear to be the focus of attention. The home next door, on the other hand, can be seen to have at least 2 vehicles in the driveway and a couple of figures, which I assume are investigators. It doesn't appear that the home is being used as a staging area for convenience. The barricade created by the squad car and police tape is at the next door driveway. If I didn't know better, this early photo of the scene would give me the impression that the secondary crime scene was this greenhouse. What were they doing at the home next door? This isn't evidence of anything conclusive at this point, but it's an anomaly that has puzzled me since first seeing this photo. Speaker 13: Hi. I'm known on YouTube as Odin Rock. On December 14, 2012, I was driving my daughter home from daycare when a news bulletin about a school shooting in Connecticut came on the radio. As soon as we got home, I made sure my daughter was occupied and then turned on the TV news. I was expecting to see a scene of chaos, of weeping, enraged parents, gnashing of teeth, pulling of hair. What I saw instead was first responders lounging around smiling, parents nonchalantly walking calm children to their cars. Over the next few days, the scene only became more bizarre with conflicting accounts and victims' families seemingly ecstatic and hungry for attention. There were many troubling and suspiciously anomalous characteristics to the event, but what really solidified my gut feeling that something was obscenely wrong with the situation was the blatant cover up and official concealment of evidence to the point we are left to ask if there is any evidence this event took place whatsoever. We could postulate this cover up began more than a year before the event when raised bill 1054, an act concerning the disclosure of pediatric autopsy reports, was introduced in the Connecticut legislature. Initially opposed by chief medical examiner Wayne Carver as redundant, he later inexplicably did an about face and supported the bill, which would end up being passed in October 2011, effectively concealing all pediatric autopsy reports from public examination. Why do this? Was this ever a problem? Fast forward to the weekend of the event, Debbie Arelia, Newtown Town Clerk, effectively breaks the law by refusing requests from the Associated Press, the New York Post, the Hartford Courant, and other media for copies of the death certificates of the victims. Miss Arelia, the subject of 2 ethics hearings in 2010 and the future wife of Sandy Hook Fire Chief Bill Halstead, soon went so far as to craft legislation with State Representatives Balinski, Hovie and McKinney to restrict all death records and marriage records for perpetuity across the State of Connecticut. Speaker 4: What else are you talking about? Are we still talking about death certificates? Which has been available for 100 of years? Speaker 14: I believe the bill covers 4 key elements. Crime scene photos are are top priority for us without a doubt, and that is for the adults as well as children. The 911 tapes because hearing can be just as bad as seeing. There is also questions over the death certificates, which have some private information on them, and also statements, which, we would like to be redacted. Speaker 13: FOIA reps and professional genealogists were vehemently opposed, along with the press, and editorials were run against it in papers as nationally prominent as the New York Times. As public suspicion intensified, the cover up went into full swing as the original bill was amended to include public release of 9:11 calls, any photographs, and even witness statements. The alleged victim's families were even brought to the Capitol to lobby for the bill, going so far as to stand on the floor of the legislature on the last night of deliberation. They continually stressed the non release of photos of dead children, even though no request had been made. And the release of such photos had been unheard of. Supporters went so far as to bring race into the debate by enlisting the Black and Puerto Rican caucus to push for the bill to cover all homicides in Connecticut, thereby making all homicide records inaccessible to FOIA requests. Parents also continually brought up in press conferences that they feared the use of such material by conspiracy theorists and Internet bloggers. The bill, which had been drafted in secret behind closed doors and without the usual opportunity for public comment, passed at 2 AM on the last night of legislature before adjournment. It left the release of 911 calls up for debate, but the release of all other records for all homicides in Connecticut would be left up to the discretion of the families. The bill passed unanimously with only 2 no votes and was signed by governor Malloy on June 5, 2013. Outrage over the bill from the freedom of information advocates led to the formation of the Victims' Privacy and Public's Right to Know Task Force. The 17 member task force was weighed heavily in favor of privacy with only 2 representatives on the side of the Freedom of Information, and they were repeatedly berated in almost every meeting for their perceived insensitivity to the victims' families. Over 6 months, the panel heard from members of the press, law enforcement and the victims' families who repeatedly claimed their rights were being violated by those seeking evidence of a crime. There was still no substantial proof of even having occurred. Speaker 15: The law also created a 17 member task force to study and make recommendations to the assembly on what should and should not be released about crimes. Among those selected to serve on the task force is officer Jillian Knox of the New Haven Police Department's victim services unit. Speaker 0: In my city, the victims that I interact with on a daily basis, they feel as though everything needs to be private. Speaker 15: The legislature and the governor were prompted to act because of Sandy Hook, but it became clear that some believed that was unfair to all of the state's other crime victims. Speaker 1: Families have a very real interest in not being being, publicized on the radio and television. I think there's a balance of it. The public has a right to know certain things, and I think that's something that the this committee needs to focus on. Speaker 15: There are other lawyers, victim advocates, media representatives, and state lawmakers on this panel that must make recommendations on where the line should be drawn, including representative Deborah Hovey, who represents Sandy Hook and who has expressed strong opinions about the media. Speaker 6: Initially, especially those first four or so months, I just felt that the media was over the top. Speaker 13: At the meeting to review the final report of the panel, the 2 Freedom of Information Representatives were surprised to learn that a 5 year prison term Class D felony provision for the public release of information pertaining to any homicide had been inserted as a recommendation in the report. The report was approved with 15 member support, the 2 freedom of information members abstaining with strong objections. The report resulted in the drafting of senate bill 388, which proposed the non release of any information that would constitute, quote, an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, applicable to any person, not just the families of crime victims. All victims and witnesses names would also remain private. Speaker 16: Access to basic information, including the names of witnesses, is essential to reversing wrongful convictions. This bill would make those efforts impossible in the state of Connecticut. The language in this section undermines transparency and accountability in our criminal justice system on a massive scale. It's it's Orwellian is what I think it is. Well I it's, it's, it's, it's, it's, it my solution is just to keep things the way they are. Speaker 3: You wanna be 13 311? Speaker 16: I wanna keep public records public because it's not just murder. It's not just homicides that is insured. It's all public records. Speaker 13: At the meeting to review the final report, and this is important, and everybody should go watch the video I made of this incident. At the meeting to review the final report of the panel, the 2 FOIA representatives were surprised to learn that a 5 year prison term class d felony provision for the public release of information pertaining to any homicide had been inserted as a recommendation in the report. The report was approved with 15 members support. The 2 FOIA members were abstaining with strong objections. Speaker 17: Completely absurd. Speaker 13: It's completely None Speaker 17: none of this makes any sense if Sandy Hook was a real event, but it makes a whole lot of sense if there's a tremendous amount to cover up because it was only a drill. And the whole state is embarrassed because it was all complicit in the event, so they're doing everything they can, conceal access to the kind of evidence that would refute the story and demonstrate it was a hoax. Speaker 13: These these 2 FOIA representatives, one of them is almost in tears that they had been sitting through the 6 months of, meetings with these people. You know? And and if you've ever been in that kind of, commission or something, you you develop relationships with the people in the commission, and they're all being friendly with you. And then they pull the rug out from under you at the at the last meeting for the recommendations. And, basically, just bald faced lie to you that that, they had discussed this this 5 year penalty for for releasing any information pertaining to any homicide. Okay? Not just Sandy Hook. Any homicide. It's just a travesty. Law enforcement and the state can get away with whatever they want to do in Connecticut now. Okay? The citizens of Connecticut have no recourse now. In effect, the bill left it to law enforcement to decide what information it would release. The implications are horrendous. Those considered wrongly convicted would have no access to information for appeal, and the decision to release information pertaining to corruption and a wide array of abuse by law enforcement would be left up to that same law enforcement agency. The legislature ended up in deadlock on the amended privacy bill, which means the original draconian limits on release of information still stand. At this point in time, the citizens of Connecticut have no access to records on any homicide, effectively leaving it up to law enforcement what information will be released. In addition to this, Peter Lanza has refused to provide any information on Adam Lanza's mental health. This did not stop him from giving an interview to the New Yorker. When child rights organization, Able Child, petitioned to have the information released on what medications Lanza was on, they were told by the deputy attorney general it would not be released because it may stop the mentally ill from taking their medication. Add to this the massively redacted official report, the reluctance to release information every step of the way can only be seen as a blatant cover up. Why not release Lanza's medical records? For that matter, why not release any evidence at all of Lanza's presence in the school that day? It may surprise the general public that there has been no evidence presented of a causal nexus between Lanza and the alleged crime. Surely, the release of this information would end most of the speculation by concerned members of the public who have been deemed hoaxers, by those who should have nothing to hide. Aren't the alleged parents of these children interested in this information? Would it not help us to prevent an event like this in the future if we knew Lance's mental state eating up to that day? Speaker 18: Hello. My name is Jeff See. I'm an independent blogger and media analyst who runs an alternative YouTube channel called Free Free Radio Revolution. My specialty is to break down events that are reported by the corporate media and try to expose the truth behind these events and what they really are about. I started covering Sandy Hook right after the event occurred. At first, I reacted like many with grief and anger, but my focus quickly shifted to all the inconsistencies of the official story and the complete ineptitude of the corporate media in investigating the alleged shooting. One of the very first characters that caught my attention was none other than Gene Rosen, a retired pet sitter who had become the focal point of numerous corporate media stories on Sandy Hook. Gene Rosen was portrayed by the corporate media as the hero of Sandy Hook for having provided shelter to 6 Sandy Hook Elementary School children in the wake of the alleged shooting. Important thing to keep in mind while watching this segment is that Gene Rosen has an extensive background in acting and is the CEO of the Newton Cable Advisory. He has also appeared in several stage productions, including a recent production of the fantastics. Gene Rosen story about how he came across the 6 children on his front lawn after the Sandy Hook shooting changes with every interview. In one interview, he's talking about how he came out of the loft where he fed the cats. In another one, he's talking about he was on his way to breakfast. Then in another interview, he said he saw the children through his window. Finally, he said that he was walking home from breakfast and saw the children on his front lawn. Upon approaching the children, Gene makes reference to a man speaking kind of harshly in some interviews as well as a school bus driver. While in other interviews, Gene completely omits the man speaking kind of harshly to the children. Speaker 19: And I saw a man talking to them in a very harsh way, and he seemed agitated. He kept saying, it's gonna be alright. It's gonna be alright. Speaker 18: One would assume with, Gene's background as being a psychologist who worked at the Newtown Fairfield State Hospital that he would be able to count. Unfortunately, according to the official report, the bus driver who Gene constantly refers to claims that only 4 children were brought to Gene Rosen's house. Gene Rosen's account of what the children told him about their traumatic experience seems very scripted and poorly acted out. Watch all the theatrics he puts into describing the kids who had allegedly just witnessed their beloved teacher, Victoria So to, get shot, and take note of the multiple inconsistencies. Speaker 19: I can't go back to the school. We can't go back to the school. We can't go back to the school. We don't have a teacher. We don't have a teacher. Missus So to, missus So to, missus So to is dead. There's blood. She had blood in her mouth, and she fell, and there was 2 guns, a big gun and a small gun. I can't go back to the school. I can't go back to the school. I don't have a teacher. I don't have a teacher. And then the other boy said, missus So to, my teacher's been shot. I I I could not fathom this. I could not imagine what they were talking about. I did not and I could not fathom in my mind what had happened. Speaker 18: Equally puzzling is what Gene did with children that came to his house. Either the parents came and picked them up, or some of them went to the firehouse, or all of them went to the firehouse. Either way, Gene goes out of his way to illustrate the joy that the parents had when they came to the house. Speaker 7: Explain to me what that moment was like. Speaker 19: When their parents came, I was so happy. Their parents is what they needed, and their parents came to the house. My arms were not long enough. Speaker 18: Once again, Gene Rose's testimony completely conflicts with that of the school bus driver in the official report. Whereas Gene Rosen said that all the parents came to his home to pick up the kids or all the kids went to the firehouse. The school bus driver says in the official report that 3 of the 4 kids were picked up by their parents at Gene Rosen's house while the 4th child was taken by both of them to the firehouse. Gene Rosen repeatedly mentions a woman who came to his house with a face frozen in fear after the children had been collected by their parents or after Jean had taken them down to the firehouse. This woman, whose name was only mentioned once, is none other than Scarlett Lewis, the mother of Jesse, who was another hero on that particular day. Speaker 10: Jesse was a hero that day. He was not just a victim. And I I tell him Nigel, a 6 year old, I think, Nigel, a 6 year old having the presence of mind to take that kind of action. I I would think he would be like all of them, just terrified. Speaker 18: The purpose of the story line is to bridge the children of Victoria So to's class to Jesse Lewis, who saved their lives by telling them to run while Adam Lanza was reloading his magazine. Speaker 19: This was the worst thing that happened. This beautiful woman came to my door. She was so pretty, but her face was frozen. It was frozen in fear. Speaker 18: It it look And so trusty Gene Rosen, the former psychologist and theater actor, has his entire story debunked neatly by the helicopter footage that was filmed on the morning of the shooting at 10:30 AM. One can clearly see mister Rosen bumbling around, perhaps even reciting his lines. There's even a brief interview which he gives, which proves that he was there, which of course means that he couldn't have been at his home with the children nor could he have been there to receive Scarlett Lewis. Speaker 19: I I wanna hold them. I wanna be with them. I wanna tell them that there is light after the darkness. Speaker 18: We have already established that Gene Rosen has an acting background. So would it surprise you if we have confirmed evidence that Rosen was indeed acting throughout all of his interviews? Let's take a look at one video in particular. It's a Gene Rosen video that is not from a news outlet, but was uploaded to the Internet nonetheless. In this video, Gene is caught rehearsing his lines. Let's check it out. Speaker 19: School bus driver picked them up. I think she had just let off some kids or was in the area. And they came inside the house, and they start talking about blood coming out of her mouth. And they said, what are we gonna do for a teacher? Our teacher's dead. Matt, I mean, they were so distraught. Speaker 18: As you've seen from the video, it was the cameraman who corrected Jean. How could a cameraman correct the person talking unless the entire thing was scripted? In case you didn't catch it, the reason why the cameraman corrected Gene was because in this version of the story, Gene states that the children immediately started talking about their teacher dying as they entered the house. It was at this point when the cameraman whispers no, and And Gene waves his arms up in the air and states, Matt. I mean. In his mainstream media interviews, Gene changes the script by stating that the kids didn't tell him about the teacher dying until 15 to 20 minutes after their stay in his house. Speaker 20: How did you first learn, and it was 4 little girls and 2 little boys, that they had just run literally from Victoria Sotos classroom, a teacher who was killed in front of them? Speaker 19: I I didn't learn about it till around 15 minutes or 20 minutes into their stay at my house. Speaker 18: The obvious reason why the cameraman and Gene are flustered is because Gene would be negligent if he didn't immediately call 911 after hearing the news of a shooting in which a teacher was shot dead. Even though his story is ridiculous as it is, it would hold zero ground if he had done nothing but have the kids play with toys while knowing their teacher was murdered. Who is this math guy anyway? Was it him who uploaded the video to the Internet? And why did he do it? Gene was literally caught in the act lying. He provided statements to the police. If he is caught deliberately providing false statements, he could be charged with criminal acts for filing false reports and obstruction of justice just to name a few. Not only that, but donation sites were put up in his name. He collected money based on the scripted statement. He was also spotted walking around at the firehouse. Could it be that he was rehearsing his lines there as well? Is there anyone out there that believes the school bus driver picked up a random assortment of kids after school was in session and then bypasses the firehouse and proceeds to drop them off on a stranger's lawn, then go inside to drink juice and play with toys instead of calling the police? Are we supposed to believe this man who is a known actor and who is caught rehearsing his lines? Was Jean included in this event because of his close proximity to the school? Was he given donation money to keep him quiet? In a fair and just society, we could present these questions and the obvious discrepancies of Jean's testimonies to the justice system. Speaker 3: As problematic and concerning as it may be, there is evidence of foreknowledge of the purported shooting that took place in Sandy Hook. Plain and simple, web pages with details of the event were put online before the event took place. And the websites where these pages appeared were the official websites of well known organizations. This evidence of foreknowledge has been met with some of the most belligerent arguments that claim this is untrue. The most common argument being that we simply lack the knowledge required to analyze the data. Data in these cases refers to the cache of a web page kept by search engines like Bing and Google. So before I get to the evidence of foreknowledge itself, let's identify a few terms and definitions that will help you gain a better understanding of a topic you may or may not be that familiar with. Google is a company that provides many services. But for our purposes, we're going to focus just on their web search service. When you search the web for a word or phrase using Googling, Google presents you with a series of pages that best match your search criteria. The results are ordered by how close they match. So results on page 1 should be better or more relevant than those on page 20. What is Google providing links to? What are these results? Most results linked to by Google are simply web pages. Although some of the results will be PDF, Microsoft Word, or other documents, Google's proprietary technology determines when and where those results show up. Since the vast majority of results and the evidence in this case are web pages, we'll limit our discussion to those. Google uses a very complicated and private method choosing which results to display and the order in which to display them. The system is ever changing and increasingly more sophisticated to abate abuse of the system. Google has detected and prevented the most clever of tricks over the years. Why would anyone want to manipulate Google's system? Imagine if you were a company that sold widgets online and had 20 web pages that advertised your widget. Imagine if through some gaming of the Google system, every search at Google always produced links to your 20 pages before any other pages. Whether the search was Angelina Jolie or Quantum mechanics, your pages came up. Although this is an extreme example, you can see how this might be desirable. How do web pages get into the results shown by Google? Before a web page can be presented as a search result, Google must first become aware of the page and index it. Then, all the various features of the page and its content can be analyzed so it can be included in search results when appropriate. Page and links to any new pages. Once complete, Google's index is updated accordingly. This process is ongoing involving many bots and many billions of pages. With that background under our belt, let's examine how to determine the date that a page was last indexed by Google and what that page contained at that time. When Google visits a web page for the first time, determined by a proprietary criteria, Google may capture and store a copy of that page. You can access the cached version of a web page by clicking the link labeled cached, shown with most search listings. Each cached page is assigned an ID and the date it was last cached. Pages that are more popular will be cached more often. Each time a page is cached, the date is updated. And if the page is changed, the new content will overwrite the old. What constitutes a page is ultimately determined by the URL address of the page. So, if a page exists that is identical in every way to another, except the URL is slightly different, Google will index it as a separate and unique page. If the URL of a page is changed in any way, then Google will consider it a new page. Even if the content of the page remains the same, a change to the URL will cause Google to index it as a new page. At around the same time, it will remove its former reference to a page. Some pages may be indexed and usually cached as well by Google once, but never qualify to be indexed or cached again based on a number of factors. In these cases, the cached version of the page and the date of cache may be as old as 9 years. Google is not concerned with certain things that may be contained within the URL like dates for instance, other than key words and phrases it will use to determine the general content of the page. So, if you were to create a page with a URL URL containing the date 7/15/1999, Google will still use the current date when indexing it. Google always records the date their bot visits the page without exception. Hopefully, now you understand the basics in a theoretical sense. Now, let's look at some real life examples to see if we can definitively determine if there was foreknowledge. And, we'll begin with a smoking gun example that would stand up in court. While we're at it, we'll take note of just how far one person went to confuse people and hide the simple truth. It all began when the website for the Arlington Red Devils posted a web page on their site with a link to a document entitled, a guide on how to talk to children about Sandy Hook. The guide was originally published by Crisis Management Institute. The date of the article shown on the page itself is 12, 10, 2012. The URL of the page also includes that date. As we just outlined, the only date that we can truly rely on to tell us when the page was last accessed by Googlebot and indexed is the date it was cached or the cache date. To see that, we simply find the cached link for the page. And when Google's cached version of the page loads, that date will always appear in Google's disclaimer box right at the top of the page. Remember though, the cached date is updated each time Googlebot returns to visit the page. So going through this process after almost 2 years would likely show a much more recent date. But thankfully, many people were curious enough in the days immediately after the event to grab a screenshot of what the page looked like back then. And those screenshots show Google's cached date for the page as 10/13/2012, one day prior to the actual event. So, let's add it up and see what we have here. Disregarding the content of the web page itself, which we've learned can be changed over time, we start with the URL of the page. As you can see, the URL contains the phrase, talking with your children about the Sandy Hook tragedy. That can only be a specific reference to the Sandy Hook shooting event. Next, we see that Google reports a cached date of 12/13/2012 for that URL. Remember, you 13 2012 for that URL. Remember, URLs can't change or Google considers it a new page. And I might add that just because we see clear evidence that Google had last indexed the page on 13th, it's very possible the page had been indexed earlier, say, 10th. At which time, Google's cached date would have shown the 10th. Case closed. Here we have an irrefutable example of foreknowledge of the event by at minimum one day. Now, let's see how this simple bit of deduction was extrapolated into a book length investigation that despite its length never came to this conclusion. A fairly popular alternative news site, Fellowship of the Minds, ran an article back on January 13, 2013 reporting that this same web page appeared to have been online 4 days before the Sandy Hook event. The article caused stir and racked up many comments. Speaker 4: But a few Speaker 3: days later, an update to the article was added explaining that many comments had been received, but one in particular from a person named Peter Offerman seemed to provide more insight. So Peter's comment was featured, which began an odyssey of endless technical jargon. This first article garnered 167 comments before comments were closed. Many of those comments were chapter length diatribes by mister Offerman that danced around the technical details of everything from blogging systems to web servers. Each promising to provide the conclusive evidence in the next issue. This went on for a further 3 articles and nearly 200 further comments. It was clear to me when I posted a comment to the first article that mister Offerman was clearly attempting to confuse the issue and doing a very good job of it. The owner of the site who happens to have penned the 4 articles was likely dazzled by the display and unfortunately taken for a ride. But the evidence was clear. Everyone's familiar with the United Way and it's not surprising that they established a fund to solicit donations for those impacted by the Sandy Hook event. But it appears they too jumped the gun on the event and published their web page advertising the fund well in advance of the event. In the case of the United Way, a page was noted in the Google search results entitled Sandy Hook School Support Fund and was published to their website for the Western Connecticut region. Unfortunately, I couldn't locate a screenshot taken early enough showing Google's cached date for the page. However, we do see Google's document date of the page shown as December 11, 2012. This isn't definitive since Google may derive that date from the page content which is subject to change. In some instances, the date is grabbed from the page where the date is actually connected to another article simply linked to on the page. When I examined a copy of the page, I found no dates whatsoever. In those cases, Google claims to revert to the cache date. But since the document date of 12/11/2012 isn't definitive proof of foreknowledge, we need to dig deeper. Deeper. The website insanemedia.net has done extensive research into this topic and provides us with some important clues. First, they report that the United Way has responded to allegations of foreknowledge and flatly rejected them. But, this is where it gets interesting. Subsequent to that, a public relations firm contracted by the United Way forwarded an email to the daily caller from an engineer at Google reading as follows. This is a technical glitch on our end. The date Google search engine first saw the page was 12/14/2012 at 6:58 PM. We're looking into a fix, but it may take some weeks. Being somewhat of an expert in these matters, I can say that this explanation is utterly ridiculous. In fact, I find it very difficult to believe that a Google engineer would make such a claim. But given that this is presented as the official explanation from the United Way's perspective, let's see if there's any other evidence that would support that. As shown right on the page in question, the United Way Fund was actually established by the Newtown Savings Bank. Not surprisingly, the president and CEO of the Newtown Savings Bank is John Trentacosta, the very same Trentacosta that owned the home next door to the Lanza's and where all the activity was taking place on the morning of the event. Mister Trentacosta is a bigger fish than some might think as he's a member of an important council at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Mister Trentacoste is quoted as saying, the Fund came together as a response to countless requests, presumably to counter any criticism that the Fund was simply a fraudulent scheme. But that's just speculation. However, the statement does present a problem. We know from the Google engineer's statement that the web page soliciting donations for the fund was indexed by Google on 12/14/2012 at 6:58 PM, the very evening of the event. How much earlier than that time was the page first put online is unknown. But, in any case, one has to wonder how it was possible in such a short time to first receive those countless requests, come up with the concept for the fund, meet to plan the whole thing, establish the bank account to collect those donations, coordinate with the United Way, determine the slogans and taglines for the campaign, create the artwork and the web pages themselves, and finally, to get all of that up and running online. If it were possible at all, it would be a world record. I don't know how many people have donated. But, the total taken in is in the millions. I find the explanations given to account for how quickly this fund was put together to be dubious. In the end, it may be this potentially fraudulent fund and the legal pursuit to reclaim those donations made by innocent people who were simply duped that becomes the first domino to fall in the greater fall of the Sandy Hook Hooks. Speaker 5: The official report, a 67 100 page data dump deprived of any useful or pertinent information because of its plethora of redactions. Well, that's how most people have described the official report as released by the Connecticut State Police. This report could have put the rest all of the skepticism from people who believe Sandy Hook was indeed a manufactured event. Instead, because of its many inconsistencies and contradictions found inside, even more questions have been raised. The excuse of a rushed report cannot be used in this case because it took almost a whole year to release it. Due to their lack of urgency, Lieutenant Paul Vance and state's attorney Steven Sudensky came under heavy fire for their lengthy delay. When asked about when he planned on releasing the report to the public, Lieutenant Paul Vance merely replied, quote, nobody ever said that we had to have it done by a certain time, unquote. The egotism of Vance and the withholding of information seems to be a recurring theme. After all, he did, in fact, call himself the master. Speaker 2: I think it's it's it's up to you to to talk with your legislators and talk Speaker 21: Well, the legislators don't listen. Speaker 2: They don't listen. Can do about it, ma'am. Speaker 21: Yes, there is. Because you can refuse to follow unlawful orders. Speaker 22: Okay. Speaker 21: If you can't do that, then means you're an enemy of America. Speaker 2: Okay, ma'am. I'm not discussing this with I think our conversation's over. I suggest you contact your Speaker 21: attorney, ma'am. So I realize, sir. Alright. Just remember. Okay? You're the servant. We're the masters. Okay? And if you come to my home Speaker 2: I'm the master. You're absolutely right. You're the master. Speaker 23: So much Speaker 2: for your No. Speaker 21: You're the servant. You're the servant. We're the masters. Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you Speaker 21: very much for Speaker 2: your conversation, ma'am. Okay. Speaker 5: And in mid 2014, he found himself in a self in a similar bind when he did not release another crime report within a respectful manner of time. Speaker 3: Was there anything unusual about the state police handling of this because of who was involved? Speaker 2: Not at all. Thoroughly complete investigation. Arrest was made. It was turned over for, to Superior Court for prosecution. Speaker 5: Nevertheless, this report which can be downloaded at the government website, cspsandyhookreport.ct.gov is their final word, their official statement, and when we find inconsistencies and contradictions within this report, they should be obligated to defend it. Now one humongous inconsistency can be found in the supplemental DNA reports from the forensic laboratory. The report numbers are shown here. This DNA report consisted of swabbing various areas of the murder weapon found at the Lanza home, which was a 22 caliber Savage rifle. Other items swabbed included a Christmas card, an envelope labeled for the young students of Sandy Hook Elementary School, the adhesive side of the stamp, and the exterior and interior door handles of the car located at the crime scene. These items were then compared to the, quote, known blood of Nancy Lanza, unquote, and a liver swab from a person allegedly said to be Adam Lanza. The results from this report are shocking to say the least. Based on the conclusions given by the forensic science examiner and analyst, Eric Kurita, both Nancy and Adam Lanza are eliminated as contributors to the DNA found on the following Speaker 4: items. Speaker 5: In fact, the only items swabbed that could be connected to an atom lens are mixtures. Now a DNA mixture is a given sample that contains the DNA of more than one individual. If you were thinking that Nancy Lanza's DNA would be one of the individuals included in the mixture, you would be wrong. Nancy Lanza was eliminated as a contributor to all of the aforementioned items. Now given these facts, many questions now are raised. How could there be more than one person's DNA found at the crime scene when according to the official report, Adam Lanza acted alone? Was the DNA contaminated? If so, how could there be any conclusive results? Astonishingly still, on January 7, 2013, a hit was obtained with the convicted offender DNA profile from the New York State Police Investigation Center for the letter entitled, for the young children of Sandy Hook Elementary School. Who is this New York convict? And what are his connections to the school and to Adam and Nancy Lanza for that matter? Was there ever a follow-up? This seems as if it should be treated with the utmost importance. So why was it swept under the rug, hidden in a 67 100 page pile, and never addressed publicly? How can we believe this official report when the forensic analyst himself concludes that both Nancy and Adam Lanza are eliminated as contributors to the DNA found at the crime scene? You have to ask yourself, what exactly is going on here? We attempted to find an answer when an email was sent to forensic science examiner, Eric Kurita. In a portion of the email, mister Kurita was asked the following, Quote, would your conclusions indicate any of the following? 1, Adam Lanza was not the shooter. 2, Adam Lanza did not work alone. 3, there was definitely somebody else involved. Was there any follow-up regarding the convict from New York and his possible involvement? Who he is and if your findings resulted in him becoming a suspect? Do you know the contents of what was found inside the envelope and why it was crucial to the investigation? The report states that the DNA sample of Adam Lanza was taken from his liver. Is this common procedure? Were you ever brought into contact with the shooter's body or was the liver swab the only source of Lance's DNA? Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you, unquote. We have yet to receive a response from mister Kurita. However, there has been one update during the production of this video. A freedom of information request has been granted to news channel 8 of Connecticut regarding the letter to the young children of Sandy Hook. Although the convict from New York is still unknown, this is what we are now being told. Speaker 7: David, how did you even learn this letter existed? Speaker 11: And it was mentioned in the Sandy Hook report released about a year ago, but that report really gave no information about it. Tonight, we have a photocopy of that letter and it's addressed to the students of Sandy Hook sent days after the shooting. Mysterious message claiming to be an apology from the father of the shooter. It was referenced in one of the thousands of pages in the Sandy Hook report. A report criticized for leaving out too much. It took a freedom of information request from the News eight investigators and a complaint to the freedom of information commission to get our hands on the contents of the envelope. A day before a scheduled hearing, the state police asked us to pull back our complaint. They would just give it to us. Police tested it for fingerprints and DNA. It did not come from Peter Lanza as the envelope says. They tested it for Adam Lanza's DNA. Police say it didn't match him either. The only match they found was an unnamed felon in New York who they believe licked the envelope. Speaker 5: This still does not explain why Adam Lanza's DNA was not found on various items at the Lanza home or why there were DNA mixtures found on those items despite there being only 2 alleged people in the house. Nancy Lanza was eliminated as a contributor to all aforementioned items. Moving on to the DNA found at Sandy Hook School, we arrive at amended supplemental DNA report 6. Here we find even more bizarre information. This report includes all of the weapons and magazines Lanza allegedly carried in the school. Strangely, it is permanent substitute teacher Lauren Russo's DNA, not Lanza's which is found on the pistol grip of the rifle, shoulder stock of the rifle, feed area inside of the magazine, the Glock Magazine, 9 millimeter Sig Sauer Magazine, p mag magazine, and 13 cartridges. Even stranger yet, of the 27 results found in this report, all but 3 are mixtures. The only unredacted DNA source that is distinctly listed alone is that of principal Dawn Hoxsprung. In result number 18, it clearly states the results are consistent with Dawn Hogsprung being the source of the DNA profile from item number 59 s 1, a 10 millimeter auto cartridge. Now if we move to the supplemental DNA report 5, we see that the same item number 59 s one was matched up to an Adam Lanza. Surprisingly though, Lanza's DNA was eliminated as a contributor to that specific item. Now if that wasn't odd enough for you, according to this same report, he was also eliminated as a contributor to the DNA found on the stock area and forearm of the shotgun, the shotgun shells, and various magazines and cartridges. The shotgun, if you recall, was found in the trunk of the Honda Civic. That very Honda Civic's interior and exterior door handles were also swabbed, but once again, Lanza's DNA was nowhere to be found. He was, however, said to be included as a source for a Sig Sauer Magazine, an item number 58 s one, a different 10 millimeter cartridge. The suicide weapon he allegedly used contained a DNA mixture. Now as you can see by cross referencing the various DNA reports, nothing seems to add up. Adam Lanza's name, for example, appears in most DNA reports, but this appears from report 6. Why would he be redacted? And why do we find Lauren Rousseau's DNA on so many items? As one blogger states, it is understandable that body fluids of victims could come into contact with the weapons carried by the murderer. It stretches credibility when that same DNA is found on bullets inside of loaded magazines. Was the supplemental DNA report deliberately designed to confuse and beguile the public in an effort to cover up the truth? If not, what are we supposed to make of these anomalous findings? The forensic science examiner is silent, so we can't expect to find an answer there. We could ask the lead Sandy Hook investigator from the Western District Crime Squad, but he, William Podgorski, age 49, died suddenly of an undisclosed illness. Lieutenant Paul Vance has proven he's unreliable as he provided the public with false information as to where the gunman was found. In a CBS interview, he quite matter of factly stated that the gunman was found in the hallway. However, we learned he was supposedly found in the classroom. Speaker 3: And where was the gunman found? Speaker 12: In the hallway. Outside Speaker 10: of the classroom. Correct. Speaker 5: Perhaps the press would help investigate these seemingly blatant inconsistencies. However, they have proven as well to be silent on such issues. The organization, Ablechild, stated it best. Prior to the release of the investigative report, the Courant was all over the shooting at Sandy Hook, but has failed to report on investigative details that scream for answers. It's one thing for lawmakers to ignore investigative material, but when a leading press organization blatantly fails to report on important investigative details, the people of the state truly are not being served. And finally, with all of the inconsistencies and lies surrounding the event, how can we be certain if DNA samples from the crime scene were really processed? Judging by the few unredacted photos we have of classroom 8, the class room in which 2 adults and 15 children were allegedly murdered, we see no evidence whatsoever of a massacre. The first two photos are images taken just inside the classroom. The last 3 were taken after the interior had been cleared. In the end, it is difficult to come to any accurate conclusion of what the anomalous supplemental DNA report suggests. And if public officials like Vance really do view themselves as masters, then We The People, in their eyes are the servants and don't deserve answers. If nothing else, that is what has to change. Speaker 22: The now famous images of the students being led away from the Sandy Hook School by educators and law enforcement personnel were captured by Shannon Hicks. Her photos of the student evacuation were some of the first images shared with the broadcast media and became front page news on papers around the world. Before these pictures were released to the AP and other media hubs, Shannon made a slideshow of some of these images and uploaded her slideshow to the Newtown B YouTube account. This video went live on December 14, 2012. Now according to Hicks, she took these photos at approximately 10:0:0:9 am on December 14, 2012. Many researchers have pointed out numerous inconsistencies in Shannon's snapshots, including various wardrobe anomalies, parking lot inconsistencies. In an effort to pinpoint the exact time that these photos were taken, I decided to examine the EXIF metadata of Shannon's photos. Finding versions of her images with intact metadata was daunting as all available versions of her images are copies of the originals. However, Hicks shared her story and a few of her photos with time.com. The photos Shannon gave to Time in her exclusive interview contained lots of EXIF data, but what that data tells us only adds to the suspicion that her photos might have been staged. If we examine 2 of her most important evacuation images, we see that they're claimed to be taken on December 14, 2012. The metadata on one of these images says that it was taken at 12 AM and another says it was taken at 6:10 PM. All of these time.com images have wildly different capture times. These times seem anomalous if this event were really taking place right in front of her camera. Looking into the metadata further, we find that these images have been manipulated in Adobe Photoshop CS 5 for Macintosh on December 19th at 5:30 PM. This fact alone invalidates the metadata timestamps as all metadata can be manipulated to the artist's liking using Adobe Photoshop CS 5. Which brings us back to Shannon's slideshow on the Newtown b YouTube account. Perhaps by examining the metadata of this video, we can come up with a more accurate picture of when these images first went online. When looking into her video's metadata, something very shocking immediately stands out. Her video was created on December 13, 2012 at 5:44 PM Eastern Time. How could it be that this video was uploaded and encoded on December 13th if the photos within that video were supposedly taken the following morning? Similarly, Jean Vauquette, an associate editor at the Newtown B, captured a short clip of the purported chaos behind the firehouse, which he also uploaded to the Newtown Bee's YouTube account. Speaker 24: Ambulances and paramedics are being dispatched in from as far away as Waterbury and the Waterbury region. Got parents standing by. The, the chairman of the school board, W. Light Liner's here. Multiple school personnel, ambulance, and state police, and others from, throughout the location, throughout the region here at, San Diego School for the still developing incident. We have no idea firmly, what's going on yet. We have SWAT, emergency services here from the state of Connecticut, armed and, moving into the area. We have no other firm information, confirmation of injuries, victims, or any information, beyond that there was a incident that possibly involved the shooting and, that we are still standing by for a firm information or a press briefing. Speaker 22: The metadata for this video also shows it was created on December 13th. This is very strong evidence that these images were taken before the event, maybe in a drill or dress rehearsal situation in preparation for the FEMA false flag terrorism event better known as the Sandy Hook hoax. Speaker 8: So jump for joy for Sandy Hook Elementary janitor named Rick Thorne who did a Paul Revere run through the hallways after spotting the gunman shouting, a gunman is coming. A gunman is coming. He checked to make sure the classroom doors were locked. I'm gonna talk about Rick Thorne and some of the discrepancies found in relation to him and early statements that were made. And these early statements that were made are very important. They're what came out before any editing and auditing has been done. Where you can find the most truth is in the early footage, the early when you compare it to what we have information that's been given out almost 2 years later. When you go back and compare, it's almost insane. I got this photo from Sandy Hook Hoag's page from Tony. This is who Tony believes to be Rick Thorne. I found another picture myself attached to the name Rick Thorne. They look similar but not identical to each other. But we can't say for sure because and this is the most suspicious thing about Rick Thorne is that he has never ever been interviewed. Speaker 23: Town police dispatcher. K. I have that. We have officers on scene. Thank you. What's your name? Rick Thorne. Okay. I'm in the building. Alright, Rick. I've got you. I'm on the other line. Alright. We have officers there. Speaker 2: Thank you. Responding at the You're on route to we have John Feinstein's church at Sandy Hook Center, Polk Creek. Speaker 23: You tell 911. What's the location of your emergency? Hello? Are you talking to me? I am talking to you. Okay. Is this Rick? 1212 Dickerson Drive, Sandy Hook. Alright, Rick. Is this you? Yes. Okay. We'll go back on the line together. Was that by is that by PD? What was that? Firehouse. To fire the firehouse. Yeah. We know. We got I'm sorry? Alright. Rick, you still with me? Yes. Alright. What do you see now? I'm standing in the corridor. Just watching this corridor. Alright. You're watching your corridor? Yes. Okay. Thank you. Speaker 8: Next to Peter or Ryan Lanza, Rick Thorne would be the number one guy the media would go after for an interview. Here we have the Sandy Hook Elementary School handbook for the year of 2,010,011. Rick Thorne's name is listed here and this is a very huge piece of evidence. If Rick Thorne, someone might say they went back and added it. It's on their web page and that probably could be done. But if they went to the trouble to add Rick Thorne's name, who should not have been employed at that time, we'll get to that here, he was still working in Massachusetts at that time. You know, if they went in to add Rick Thorne, why did they not correct Kevin Ancelotti's name? He's listed here as Antonelli, head custodian, instead Anzalotti. So the fact that they added him after the fact doesn't make sense either. My belief is this whole handbook was fudged and created. So we have a newsletter here dated August 28, 2012, and this lists Rick Thorne, Kevin Anzalotti, and a couple other names, worked tirelessly to prepare our school for its opening day. So this is for the school year of 2012. Next, we'll get into this article dated November 19, 2012. Rick Thorn worked as a custodian in Kempsford, Massachusetts for 22 years, earning $20 an hour cleaning floors, cutting grass, setting up assemblies for the community. He's currently on retirement pension, getting $1500 a month. And further in the article, it says Greenwood, whose wife has cancer, and Thorn still don't have new jobs 16 months later. So he was fired in June of 2011. In June of 2011, he was still working for Kempsville school system. Why is he in the 2010-eleven handbook? This does not make sense. And it says 16 months later, he still doesn't have a new job. This takes us to November of 2012 that he still doesn't have a job according to this article. So why is he in Don's newsletter in August? None of this lines up. This is a comment from a thread on Godlike Productions and it's a very well written comment so I'm gonna share this about more discrepancies involving Thorne. The Rick Thorne call divided into 4 sections in the release 911 recordings is extremely problematic for the conventional Sandy Hook narrative. Burton and others have Thorne the gunman before they even have time to call 911, yelling at him to stop shooting and put the gun down. Abby Clement states that when she entered the northwest hall of the school, Thorn had already run past her position towards the front lobby some 20, 30 yards away. Thus, Clemens has Thorn in the lobby only moments after the shooting began within the school. Yet on the 911 call attributed to Thorn, he merely states, I believe there's a shooting at the front glass, something. I don't know what is going on. If Thorne had really run through the lobby to go eyeball, eyeball with a gunman and order him to drop his weapon, then purported content of this call makes absolutely no sense. I don't know. I keep hearing popping are not the words of a man who had just gone toe to toe with a mass murderer discharging a 2 23 Bushmaster inside of school. Also, how can one explain Thorne's omission of having seen the mangled bodies of Don Hochsprung and Mary Sherlock after passing them in the lobby while running through the biggest puddle of blood ever? As in almost always the case with recounts of Sandy Hook incident, it is difficult to determine who is the liar. If call 1 was placed by Barbara Halstead, then Cox, Roig Day, and Halstead's daughter are liars. If this call from Thorne is legitimate, then Clemens, Burton, Penna, Day are liars. Who is the deceptive party here, Thorne or the others? Or are they all liars, affusicating participants in an event that is essentially a sham? Did this call attributed to Thorn even take place in real time? I don't know where the truth actually lies, but once again, the call attributed to Thorne is extremely problematic. And there's more. There's this next article. I have found a big discrepancy with what custodian Rick Thorne says. 1 of the dead staff in the hallway, either Don Hochsprung or Mary Sherlock, was wearing versus what the official report says the principal slash psychologist wore. Rick said one of them was wearing an orange dress. Lastly, Thorn related that as he was being escorted out of the school, he observed 2 adult females lying in the hallway by the office. Thorne stated that they were near a bench, and they both appeared shot. Moreover, Thorne stated that he did not recognize them, but he did notice that one of the females was wearing an orange dress. His testimony was taken December 14, 2012 at 12:51 hours, so it would have been fresh on his mind. Now notice in the scene report, a detailed description of both Don and Mary are given their deceased state in the hallway. Guess what? Both are wearing jeans and not a dress. And here's the specifics. Missus Hochsprung had brown hair and was wearing a gray and red hooded sweater, red long sleeve shirt, blue jeans, and a Catholic brown colored boots. Missus Sherlock was wearing a blue long sleeve shirt, tan tank top shirt, blue jeans, blue socks with a brown colored shoes. There was a pair of eyeglasses on the floor east of her body. There was a blue colored material around her head that was possibly a headdress or large neck scarf. So who is lying? Anyone see a problem with this? Moving on. Those are all huge. I'm gonna share this from the town of Kemps Ford annual town report fiscal year of 2011. School employee payroll has Thorn listed here with a salary of $50,640.37. So that was his yearly salary. I'm gonna share this as well. This is a spokeo record connected to Kempsford Rickthorn on Gorham Street. I did not find a specific number address for Gorham Street, but I snooped around a little bit. There's this weird article about bones found at 54 Gorham Street. I'm not gonna share details of that right now, but I'll show that that address sold November 14, 2012 for $1. So that's a month prior to the events of Sandy Hook. There's another 38 Gorham Street that sold for a dollar listed here on December 28, 2012. So 2 weeks after the event. This clip here, this screenshot shows 3 $1 houses listed on December 27, 2012. 46 Gorham, 42 Gorham, and 38 Gorham Street, all sold 13 days after the events of Sandy Hook. And then another $1 sale on February 18, 2013 on that street. So like I said, I don't have specific address, and I can't tie Thorn to any of those. I just thought it was interesting enough to share. This Glenn Beck article here talks about courage and inspiration in Newtown CT Overcomes Tragedy. This little clip from the Glenn Beck article says, one of the staff members at Sandy Hook took up a collection for Rick Thorne and his family and gave him a gift certificate he could use for books for his 3 daughters in college. Well, this throws me off of the trail that I was on because the person I thought to be the identity that I followed for Rick Thorn in records like Advanced Background Intellius to show who his family are and to try to find more on him would be a dead end if he has 3 daughters. Because the records that I found for the Kempsford, Rick Thorne has one daughter and one son, both adults, daughter married. I'm not sure 100% what the correct trail is for Thorne because we have nothing on them. There's been nothing shared on them other than what the media has put out in the 911 calls. So thank you for your interest in Sandy Hook. Take care. Speaker 3: The media may not have simply overlooked the discrepancies in the case of Sandy Hook. Outlets like CNN and others seemed to in a few instances fully participate in the deception. Take for instance a CNN piece from just a few days after the event. To quote from the article, scuba was clipping hair on Friday at Robert Anthony's hair salon, the shop he, his mom and sister have run for the last 13 years. Because this case was so devoid of fruitful leads for reporters to follow, it's not unexpected for them to resort to a war of sensationalism. In this example, the reporter Wayne Drash attempted to portray Adam Lanza as a deeply disturbed individual. Let's watch for a moment. Speaker 25: The owner of the Robert Anthony Salon in Newtown says Adam Lanza was silent and never made eye contact when he'd come in with his mother for his regular haircut. Speaker 4: I always make jokes with him trying to talk to him and just make conversation with him trying to say it worked. He he wouldn't look down for the tile. He wouldn't look up. Speaker 25: Even though Lanza was in his teens, Scuba says his mother appeared firmly in control. Speaker 4: The only time that he would move Speaker 26: or make any type of movement Speaker 4: is when his mother told him to. Speaker 23: That was it. Speaker 27: And that was the only times. Speaker 3: The man whose comments we were just treated to is Robert a Scuba. The article refers to him 13 times as a barber, and his comments were about cutting the young Adam Lanza's hair. Scuba puts his hand on the black barber chair. That sick son of a. The barber shakes his head. The barber's sister would tell him there was something wrong with Lanza, that he wasn't right. So I guess he's a barber somewhere in the Newtown area. The first problem with the story is there's no business license as Robert Anthony's hair salon in the area. But a person by the name of Robert A Scuba senior is listed as doing business as Design Crete USA. So, that part of the story checks out. While we're at it, let's see if Bob Scuba is a licensed barber. Barbers are required to be licensed after all. It appears that no barber with the last name Scuba has been licensed in the state of Connecticut since at least 1997. That's odd, the article seem to overemphasize that Bob was a barber. Let's try another tactic and see if Bob might actually be a hairdresser. We do get a listing for Robert Scuba, let's see the details for that listing. It shows his license is inactive and expired on August 31, 2008. But the article stated, Scuba was clipping hair on Friday at Robert Anthony's hair salon. How's that possible if Bob's license expired as far back as 2,008? Let's check on the license for the salon itself. Checking under Design Crete USA, it's DBA, we get one result. It says it's inactive. Well, what do you know? It expired on December 31, 2012. So, it was a licensed salon on the 19th when the reporter made his visit, but it never renewed its license when it expired just a few days later in almost 2 years ago. I don't know about the owner of the salon, whether it's still an operation or under what name it might currently be licensed, but I think it's a fair assumption to make that the comments made by Robert Scuba were strictly for effect only. Did he ever cut the hair of a person named Adam Lancer even once? I doubt it. I'll conclude this line of investigation with another quote from the CNN article. I wish I would have killed him then, he says, For he should have killed himself a long time ago. He would have saved us all the trouble. He should have run-in front of a bus or some other type of terrible death. He should have done it to himself. He would have saved all those kids and parents the trouble. I should have slipped and stabbed him by accident. It would have been a lot better for those people. Speaker 5: There is very little video footage from the day of the event. The video footage that we do see is chock full of anomalies. Based on these anomalies, many people have come to the conclusion that what we are seeing is evidence of a drill rather than that of a mass shooting. So let's take a look at a few examples so you could judge for yourself. Scanning the scene of the incident, we observed that Dickinson Drive, the road between the firehouse and Sandy Hook School, is completely blocked off. Trapped from going either forward or backward, the lone ambulance on Dickinson is practically useless. All other ambulances are parked at the firehouse away from the crime scene and are all facing the same direction. By 10:29 AM, under an hour after the onset of the event, ambulances and even small quads were inaccessible as evidenced by 408's transmission stating, I can't get the quad up here. The road's blocked too much. Gridlock was a major issue. And Marine Will, who just so happens to live directly across the street from the firehouse, was the Newtown director of emergency communications and was at the helm during the event. In a shocking admission, miss Will admits gridlock was an issue, stating that surrounding law enforcement agencies self deployed resulting in gridlock on Riverside Road, forcing her to place another local fire station on standby because the trucks at Sandy Hook were completely blocked in. Gridlock can also be attributed to having the reunification point at the firehouse just a few 100 feet away from the school, thus clogging the streets with any potential parents attempting to pick up their child. At the school, there is no evidence of a chaotic scene. There is a fire truck that was granted access, but curiously, there are no ambulances. Now note, it has been established through matching the highly questionable police report and the police and fire department scanner feeds with the aerial feed that we arrived at a time frame between 10:36 and 11 AM, and that's for the helicopter footage that we see. Also take note that if we believe the official story, nurse Sally Cox and secretary Barbara Halstead hid in a closet in the exact same area where the state police were conducting the investigation until 1:15 PM for approximately 4 hours. So why is this important? It's important because this proves that not everyone was accounted for at the time of the aerial footage. Yet, we see blocked ambulances, gridlock, and zero sense of urgency. Emphasizing the lack of urgency even more, let's take a look at police dashcam video. At 12:21 PM, just under an hour prior to Sally Cox and Barbara Halstead coming out of the closet, no pun intended of course, these officers decided it was a good idea to bust out the snacks, chips, bananas, and bottled water during a mass shooting investigation. Mind you, deceased innocent little first graders are allegedly just feet away from the vehicle, but somehow they were able to stomach and ingest food and beverages. These are the same officers who received 1,000,000 of dollars in compensation from the federal government for healing. For instance, August 28, 2013, the Washington Times reported that the Federal Government would send $2,500,000 in taxpayer money to Connecticut Police Agencies to help the community heal. On June 17th 2014, the Obama administration dished out another $7,100,000 to Newtown's first responders, victims families, and law enforcement. The obvious question here is why would law enforcement need extra enormous sums of money for simply doing their job? But even more bizarre is the fact that these officers were able to take a break in the action while some people were yet to be accounted for. Many people have wondered if gridlock was deliberately done to prevent certain EMTs who weren't in the know from going into the school. After all, it wasn't until 10 AM when a meeting occurred between sergeant Kerio and Danbury director of emergency medical services, Matthew Casaveggia took place. Up until this point, nobody except for certain members of law enforcement were allowed inside. In the end, not one EMT outside of any law enforcement agents who may or may not have assessed any alleged victims was allowed in until it was too late. Matthew Casavecchia and his two accomplices were brought in after their fed. And other EMTs such as 44 year old EMT, James Wolf, gave helpless statements saying, quote, it was difficult to see and especially because we weren't an action doing things trying to save people. You may not be able to save everybody, but you damn well try. And when we didn't have the opportunity to put our skills into action, it's difficult, unquote. And Sophia Smallstorm and her memorable presentation on Sandy Hook outlined how ludicrous it was to not have attempted all measures in rescuing children from the school. Speaker 7: While we did see start tarps on the day of Sandy Hook, they were empty. The white mounds you see in these pictures are actually emergency gear. Ambulance crews learned that no bodies were coming out. They would be kept in the building to which only the police had access. Ambulances were made to wait down the street at the firehouse. This is what was posted on an Internet forum about the emergency response at Sandy Hook. I'm gonna read it to you. The main sticking point is the EMS services did not behave within their normal scope. A mass shooting would have had trauma helicopters flying children out one after another, performing CPR the entire way to the hospital, and patients would be declared dead at the hospital after extensive measures were taken to try to save lives. I've been in the ER for 5 years, and we get all code blue patients. We get 80 year old nursing home patients that have not been breathing for 20 minutes with no chance of survival, and we perform CPR and necessary medical intervention with the chance that patients may regain a pulse. Speaker 28: On that on that horrible day on Friday, you guys were assigned to a triage area, and and it it didn't unfortunately end up being used. That that must have been a just a sickening feeling to to to be there at this triage unit and then realize there's not people coming in. Speaker 19: At at the time, I a few times during the incident, I actually, thought to myself, should I be hoping that this area was filled with injured people? Speaker 5: Despite the fact that there was acknowledgment of gridlock, blocked ambulances, and perhaps evidence of negligence, at the time of this production, there is yet to be even a single lawsuit made by the parents of the alleged victims. Now there are plenty of reasons why people think Sandy Hook was a drill gone live. Remember the footage of the parents walking aimlessly at the firehouse? Speaker 0: Alright. This is it gets really interesting in a minute. And you're gonna see without a doubt how the people are recycling back into the building. Alright. Now the helicopter's pulling out. See the line of people there? See the line of people? Alright. We're coming up to the front. Look how they're coming back in. They're taking that turn. Watch them take the turn up and they're coming right back into the building. Speaker 5: Now skeptics erroneously have attempted to denounce this evidence as manufactured and looped by YouTubers. Yet, as we can see, before the helicopter video pans out, the people are just filing right back into the firehouse. Yes. Arrows were given out by various youtubers to show the characters moving around, and yes, songs were attributed to the edited versions of the videos to clearly show how ludicrous it all is, and yes, the video is played forward and backward right before it pans out to show clearly where the people are headed. But this tape quite clearly is not looped, and we can clearly see people walking in circles. When we focus on individual people in the video, we see the same anomalous behavior. The kid in the yellow Under Armour shirt is the best example of this. Throughout the time he has observed, he just walks aimlessly around in circles. He does this until a lady walks up to him and ushers him away. Now, did this lady notice that he was a little too blatant in his attempt at creating a chaotic scene? Now, take a look at the man in the gray sweatshirt. His name is Joseph Wasick and his daughter Alexis gave several interviews to the media throughout the day. He enters the video at around 50 seconds in when he exits the firehouse door and then walks around. He is seen again going back inside the firehouse at about 4 minutes and 10 seconds into the video and then at the end of the video, he is seen exiting the building once again at around 10:21 into the video. If you pay close attention to the individual people in the footage, you will notice the same awkward behavior of walking in and out of the firehouse doors, of course, without a child. And to clear up any confusion you may have about the dash cam videos and the lack of evidence of a mass evacuation, let's take a look at the police report. In report number 000567 32, the John McGeever dash cam timeline. It states that quote, the following is a timeline of pertinent events that were captured by the video recorder and observed and recorded by me while watching this DVD signed by Allison Peters. It is a video of a forward facing view from the cruiser of the school parking lot and captures the northeast corner of the building. Now the northeast corner of the building just so happens to be where the majority of the alleged evacuations took place. Remember, the officer claims to have watched the video and observed the mass evacuation, yet we never see it in the video. These are blatant lies. The issue with Sandy Hook is the abundance of redactions and the total lack of visual and video evidence pointing to a real mass shooting. We are told many tales of what happened, but how can we trust the Connecticut State Police when they have been proven to be liars? We are told that 25 of the bodies weren't even worth rushing to a hospital. We are told that only 3 EMTs were allowed access into the school to assess the dozens of bodies located inside. Everybody else was ordered to stand off. We were told that these bodies were left to rot in the school all day long. We were told by Peter Lanza of all people via the New Yorker that his son could barely tie his own shoe at the age of 17. Yet, this uncoordinated mentally challenged kid was able to accomplish the unthinkable within just minutes. The police report states that Lanza, after he was done with his rampage, piled dead bodies in a bathroom. Before this, the police report states that he aimed his gun at each person before he shot them, not saying anything, but meticulously pointing. He was able to do this and fire up 150 rounds within just minutes, killing 26 people. Is it any wonder that people question the official story? Speaker 26: Hello to everybody out there. My name on YouTube is professor Doom. And I wanna take a moment right now to thank you all who have shown and expressed interest in this subject. The one of the biggest hoaxes that have ever been per perpetrated on the American public, and that is the events that took place December 14, 2012 at Sandy Hook, Connecticut. I wish to thank, those who've asked me to, participate in the collaboration of this video. And for those of you who have seen my videos on this particular subject, I will be covering a few of the findings that I have discovered and I have presented in previous videos, but I represent here in this collaboration for you all, and I will get to that here right now for you. I'd like to share with you here a little bit of my background so you can understand why I took on the project of making videos regarding the Sandy Hook Hoax, and you'll get a better understanding of what experience I've had in the matters of studying police documents and police reports. I took a paralegal course and have written many briefs. I have written federal lawsuits, state tort actions, 1 amicus curiae. And for those of you who do not know what an amicus curiae is, it is a friend of the court brief. I have also done several petition for habeas corpus motions. With my experience in, studying police reports in writing up some of my habeas corpus petitions, that's what got me interested in the Sandy Hook documents that were provided for researchers and people who are just expressing interest in the subject of the Sandy Hook event. So let me get on now with my very first document here that I want to show you. This document here is from the Connecticut State Police. And you will be able to see here in their reports, and a lot of these reports were just from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Connecticut State Police was reporting what the FBI had reported to them. And in this report here, it goes on to state thus, the shooter schooling began at Sandy Hook Elementary School and moved on to Newtown Middle School for 5th and 7th grades. Around 7th grade, the shooter moved to Saint Mary's School and then moved to Newtown High School where he completed 9th grade. K. So I'm going to stop there on this document, and I want you to take notice that nowhere in this document does it ever mention anything about the school Saint Rose of Lima. And as you can see here, that they make it quite clear that Adam Lanza, the shooter, had attended Sandy Hook Elementary School. We can see in this document here, this is an official police document that was provided for, researchers. And they go on to state here that on March 6, 2013, this detective met with 4 individuals who had worked or who has or have worked at Sandy Hook School for an extensive period of time. Furthermore, they worked at the school when the shooter attended. Through the memory of the aforementioned yearbooks and a Sandy Hook School map, were able to obtain which classrooms the shooter was in while he attended Sandy Hook School. With those two documents alone, you would get the sense that Adam Lanza did in fact attend Sandy Hook Elementary School. Yet, there appears to be conflicting documents with the 2 documents that I just presented to you right there. And, in the first document that differs from that account is this one right here. This document here was written up by Rachel Van Ness after they requested permission from Adam Lanza's father, Peter Lanza, to obtain all school records for Adam Lanza from Newtown, Connecticut. And the only school that is mentioned here or in any other documents where records were to be obtained and the only school listed is Saint Rose of Lima School, and it states here. Number 355, Saint Rose of Lima School records pertaining to Adam Lanza. Didn't we just see in the very first document that I presented that the only schools that were mentioned were Sandy Hook, Newtown Middle, Saint Mary's, and the high school? There is no mention in that document at all that Adam Lanza Everett attended Saint Rose of Lima School. So why is it that they are making the claim that he attended Sandy Hook when this document and Peter Lanza refute that claim. And they are specifically requesting school attendance records for Saint Rose of Lima only and no other school at all. Now I want to show you the next document, and I want to remind you I've poured through every document that they presented for researchers. And there was and we're talking over over a 1000 of these documents. And the only document that reports a, an official request by subpoena for the school records of Adam Lanza was made to Saint Rose of Lima. Saint Rose of Lima school records, subpoena served on 1, 2,2013, I served principal Mary Rose Maloney with a subpoena for Adam Lanza's school records. And they claimed that they did in fact receive the school records. How come in none of these documents? Is there any request by subpoena for the school records of Adam Lanza from Sandy Hook Elementary, from Newtown Middle School, or from any other school for that matter. Only this one. And that seems to be in complete contradiction to the document stating by the Connecticut State Police and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that Adam Lanza attended Sandy Hook Elementary School. Speaker 3: Most of you watching this are aware that the purported shooter Adam Lanza had an older brother Ryan Lanza. Ryan was reported to be employed by the accounting firm Ernst and Young at the time of the Sandy Hook incident. I touched on Ryan earlier just briefly, but it's worth learning a bit more about him as it relates to another anomaly. To begin with, the initial reports of the Sandy Hook event cited anonymous sources as claiming the perpetrator was one Ryan Lanza. Speaker 4: The gunman was identified at 11/28 as, again, 24 year old Ryan Lanza of New Jersey. Speaker 29: They're also going to locations associated with the shooter, not just directly associated with Ryan Lanza, his residence, and and and they're looking for a location in New Jersey there. Speaker 6: Comps have identified the shooter as a 24 year old man, Ryan Lanza. Speaker 18: We have just now confirmed, apparently, the shooter is identified. He is 20 year old Ryan Lanza. Speaker 25: The shooter, it is Ryan Lanza. Ryan Lanza is the shooter. Speaker 20: The shooters has been identified to me by a source as Ryan Lanza. Ryan Lanza. Speaker 3: A short time later, the media accounted for this discrepancy by claiming the ID was made by identifying documents on the deceased shooter. Apparently, Adam was carrying Ryan's driver's license for some unexplained reason. Some accounts claim it was Ryan himself that suggested Adam might have his ID. Others who were following the story in those first few days remember reading about Ryan's reaction to being identified as the shooter. The following posts were made to his Facebook account. Everyone shut the fuck up. It wasn't me. I'm on the bus home now. It wasn't me. It wasn't me. I was at work. It wasn't me. Fuck you, CNN. It wasn't me. These reactions are not unusual considering the unlucky situation Ryan appeared to have been in. Not to mention that following the media's false report, Ryan reportedly received a number of death threats through social media. Ryan was reportedly living with either his girlfriend or a roommate in Hoboken, New Jersey, while Adam reportedly lived with his mother, Nancy. Ryan reportedly stated he hadn't seen or spoken to his younger brother in about 3 years at the time of the event. Later on the day of the supposed shooting, Ryan was taken into custody for what they claimed was his own protection. I can't locate anywhere in the official report details of an interview between Ryan and law enforcement officials. However, there are Hoboken police and FBI records that contain some details of the arrest of Ryan and a very detailed interview from the day of the event, but the name of who's being interviewed is redacted. Still, because the details given are so specific and appeared to come from someone with intimate knowledge of the Lanza family, it's a fair assumption that the person being interviewed is Ryan. Another document refers to one of the interviewees on that day having an alibi. Someone that morning had made a purchase at a Dunkin Donuts using their credit card, which from their use of the word alibi seems to have satisfied investigators that they were not directly involved in the shooting. It's worth noting that there were other unusual reports in those first few days including that he lived with his father, Peter Lanza, that his girlfriend and a friend were missing, and that his father was found dead in his home. But not his home in Stamford, a home in Hoboken. Outside of the initial blitz of Facebook posts and the media's reporting of Ryan in those first few days, nothing else about Ryan has been reported. Sure, there have been blogs posting questions like, what happened to Ryan? Or is Ryan still in custody? But nothing has been reported about Ryan's current status. Does he still work for Ernst and Young? Does he still live in Hoboken? Has anyone seen or heard from him in recent months? Even more unusual is that Ryan himself hasn't emerged to give a statement. Even if Ryan were concerned about what line of questioning he might face if he were to present himself to the media, he could have simply issued a statement or arranged for an interview under tightly controlled conditions. The bizarre mix of reports, statements, and details pertaining to Ryan and Adam are too numerous to cover in-depth in this report. But just working with the elements I've presented, I'm sure you would have difficulty trying to piece together a storyline that could account for most of the details and false reports. There appears to be some kind of deception going on here, but exactly what that is I can't speculate. Which brings me to one of the more interesting theories having emerged in the ensuing months that attempts to account for at least some of these anomalies. It is being speculated by some that the persons being reported as Adam and Ryan Lanza are actually the same person. Having researched this case since the day of the event, I admit that I cannot refute the theory and remain open to it. Most who posit the theory speculate that Ryan was once named Adam, and changed his name sometime around 2009. Still, others simply theorize that Adam never existed at all. A theory that, if true, would pose a real problem for authorities involved in the case. This, the last of my three segments though, is about a strange event that occurred in late December of 2012 relating to Ryan. Sometime soon after the shooting event on 14th, a Facebook account was created that purported to be that of Ryan Lanza. Subsequent to that, a reporter from the New York Post contacted the account holder, which somehow led to what the New York Post reported as a Facebook interview. The Post wasted no time in running with the story and reported some of what was said by Ryan. I'm a victim. I lost my mom and brother. I will miss you, bro. I will always love you as long as I live. They reported that Ryan posted a picture of Adam with the following message, rest in peace, Adam Peter Lanza. The problem with all of this is that it was a complete hoax. Ryan had reportedly shut down his Facebook account almost immediately after the event. Countless Facebook and other social media pages were then created by persons other than Ryan. Just days after the post ran their story, they were contacted by Errol Cockfield of the public relations firm, Edelman, which happens to be the world's largest public relations firm. Acting as a spokesperson for the lands of family, he issued a statement on their behalf that chalked the whole thing up to the unfortunate result of a poor editorial process. Boy, that's putting it mildly. Thanks to the New York Post, other publications picked up their story including Huffington Post, the UK Telegraph, TMZ, and others. They must have assumed as many would that editors at the post had verified the reporter's story, especially in light of the hair trigger reporting that had plagued the story just days earlier. What bothered some wasn't the fact that the post screwed up and ran with a totally illegitimate story. It was the way in which they handled the recovery from their blunder. 1st, rather than retract the story and remove it from their website, they chose instead to simply update the story. In other words, they kept the full text of the totally fabricated story, and simply noted that it was a hoax. To which when read would prompt the reader to ask, why the hell am I reading this? The story remains plastered throughout the Internet linking back to the Post story as any reputable news outlet would. Next, the Post couldn't resist making a last ditch effort to deflect the blame onto those who would shamelessly reprint their story. In the metro section, they ran a brief update they called twisted fake on Facebook. The last sentence reads, the bogus posts and instant message chats were reported by news outlets including the post, which implies they were no more responsible than any of their syndication partners. Someone needs to inform the author, Chuck Bennett, that the post doesn't just reprint the work of others. Sometimes they break real scoops even if it is all make believe. If that all wasn't weird enough, there's the matter of the public relations firm that issued the statement denying that Ryan had any communication with the post. As I mentioned, the firm Edelman was somehow retained by the Lanza family to handle this issue and potentially others. They are the largest PR firm and their niche is big business, not representing 2 guys looking to maintain their privacy. Representing Edelman on behalf of the Lanzess is Errol Cockfield. Errol is an interesting character. He doesn't strike me as being the company's top agent, but he certainly has his share of sticky situations under his belt. Speaker 4: The the woman that was, mentioned in the Post piece, today, when asked by a reporter from the Post, this $1,000 payment, did you work for any time? Did you work for veterans? And she said, no. I hardly know him. And yet there's a $1,000 payment to her. How do you reconcile that? Speaker 22: Well, I think I think Speaker 30: this has been a very emotional time for some of the folks involved in these And as I mentioned before, it's been an effort to sort Speaker 4: of reconstruct history. Speaker 30: You may not remember where you were in in 2,002 every every period for the year 2,002 or 2003. Speaker 3: He was press secretary to New York Governors Eliot Spitzer and David Patterson during periods of scandal for both. He was chief of staff to the New York State Democratic Conference and was press secretary for the Empire State Development Corporation, New York's primary economic development agency. Before his stints in government and PR, he was a reporter for 12 years and actually worked at the Hartford Current. Let's wrap up this tangled mess with a brief quote from a blog called The Crisis Buzz, which featured Caulfield as a speaker at an event in 2013. Errol Caulfield is a vice president at Edelman, a global public relations firm where he advises corporations on crisis and issues management. Caulkfield specializes in developing strategic communications plans to mitigate risk as well as proactive messaging to strengthen reputations. Assuming that Edelman has no need to service individuals like the, I wonder which corporation Cockfield is advising behind the scenes. Speaker 27: What is the value of a human being, of a child, of a victim of tragedy? What makes the value of one person worth more than the value of another? When is enough enough? Sandy Hook families have been compensated 1,000,000 of dollars by the government. They have raised 1,000,000 themselves through private charities and fundraisers. Others have donated tens of 1,000 of dollars, and yet, almost 2 years after the event, they are still asking for more, and they continue to receive more as well. What is it that makes them so different as to have become instant millionaires? If this event was real, do you think it is morally right to use the death of a family member in order to solicit annual goals of tens of 1,000 of dollars? Some families are even documented as having an annual goal of upwards of $500,000, and that's not counting government grants that they were awarded. Deaths occur every day in the United States, and just about every one of those families must deal with tragedy on their own, struggling to make ends meet. But we know Sandy Hook is different, much different. After seeing all of the anomalies, inconsistencies, and lies surrounding the official story, one can't help but think that all the charities, funds, federal grants, and donations are just part of a gigantic payoff scheme. Take a look for yourself at the 1,000,000 of dollars flowing into Newtown and then make up your own mind as to what you think is going on. Speaker 5: When the president revealed his 5 $100,000,000 gun control plan in early 2013, he used Sandy Hook as his justification. Now is the time was the motto. Background checks, the banning of high capacity magazines and assault weapons, increased school security, and increased mental health services were the stated goals. The parents of the alleged victims walked hand in hand with this plan using the exact same language as outlined in the proposal. Speaker 7: Now is the time to Speaker 5: Following the signing of the New York Safe Act, the Firearm Safety Act, and the Connecticut Gun Control Bill, Connecticut, Maryland, and New York were the first three states to become affected by the plan, causing an outcry amongst citizens. In Connecticut, one man voiced his opinion louder than most. Speaker 31: I'm not here to cite crime statistics, lives saved with a gun or the economic impact for the proposed asinine legislation, some of these gun control bills you have proposed. I will have a read from the Connecticut State Constitution. Section 15 reads very clearly, we all know what the Second Amendment says, that Section 15 in the state constitution says very clearly, every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state. There's no registration. There's no permitting. There's no background checks. It's quite clear. Speaker 5: While most people are aware of the correlation between Sandy Hook and gun control, many are incognizant of the mental health connection. Enter Adam Lanza, who according to the state police report had no clear motive for the alleged shooting spree. In an effort to fill an obvious void of intention, blame was placed on lands' claimed mental illness despite the fact that no mental health records had been made public. A fact that didn't stop the media, politicians, Sandy Hook parents, and the pharmaceutical industry from lobbying for and passing expensive mental health legislation. Confirmation on Lanza's mental health history is blurry at best. Lanza's stated primary psychiatrist, doctor Paul Fox, was forced to surrender his license in July of 2012. After his place of employment became aware of ethics violations, he was discovered having sexual relations with clients while prescribing them with mind altering drugs. After being highly dosed by doctor Fox, one mother described her daughter as a walking zombie. Seems like a reliable source of information, doesn't he? Shortly after being fired, doctor Fox fled the country to New Zealand. He gave his official statement on the Sandy Hook investigation to the Connecticut State Police over the phone on December 17, 2012. A summary was given by the police explaining, quote, all of his medical records pertaining to clients he treated in the United States are currently in storage in the United States. Just one day later, Fox renounced his statement as he explained to police, quote, any medical records pertaining to Adam Lanza have been destroyed since it has been over 5 years. The 5 year statute excuse that doctor Fox used is false. The med watch organization, Ablechild, found fault with this claim statute as they discovered, quote, according to the regulations of Connecticut State Agency's medical records, 19 a dash 14 dash 42, unless specified otherwise herein, all parts of a medical record shall be retained for a period of 7 years from the last date of treatment. Questions surrounding lands his mental health are endless, not to mention his entire existence. So what do we actually know about Adam Lanza? Perhaps digging into his past life can lead to some sort of justification for the 1,000,000 of dollars spent on mental health as a result of the event. But it seems as if his entire existence is shrouded in mystery. After 2,009, there is very little trace of him at all. The younger pictures of the boy portrayed as Adam Lanza are of a joyful, smiling child, while the recent images issued out by the media are psychotic looking. The grainy googly eyed photos that we see appear to be altered to create the illusion of a deranged psychopath. There are unnatural straight edge lines on the neck area. There are blurred out areas near the mouth and the googly eyed effect is, well, a nice attempt at creating a mentally disturbed kid. Peter and Nancy divorced in 2009. At this time, Adam disappears from the radar and his brother Ryan appears, causing many people to believe that Adam and Ryan are 1 in the same. Now we can't say with any certainty that this is the case. Nonetheless, the media was careless at times and outright deceitful in their attempt to get an accurate portrayal of Adam. One example comes from the Joshua Flashman interview. Attempting to give motive to the shooting, Fox News reached out to Flashman, a native of Sandy Hook, Monroe area, an aspiring actor and who supposedly had inside information regarding the Lanza's. He was quoted by Fox News falsely stating that Nancy Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she loved the kids more than she loved him, and that she was planning on having him committed, A nice attempt at creating motive. Shortly after the article was published, Flashman took to the comment section and his Twitter page to dispute how Fox portrayed him as an insider. He states the following. I told the reporter about what was being said in the town. Nothing more, nothing less. I told the reporter what the people in town were saying about Adam Lanza's motive, and next thing I know, I'm intimately acquainted with the Lanza family and knew Adam's motives firsthand. Funny, I didn't know that. Fox approached me and spent 2 days trying to convince me to go on the record, but I just wanted to get on TV. Right? Yes. This is how the media operated during the onset of the Sandy Hook event. If there wasn't a clear motive, make it up. If someone spoke out on a subject, twist his or her words to create motive. Instead of reaching out to a second or third hand source, one would think the media would go right to the source, Adam's father. Adam's father, Peter, has never given an on camera interview. His only public testimony comes via The New Yorker in an article entitled, The Reckoning by Andrew Solomon. Allegedly, it was Peter who reached out to Solomon saying that he was finally ready for an interview. So why Andrew Solomon of all people? One would think that every news agency in the land would be foaming at the mouth to get the blockbuster interview from the killers father. The seemingly obvious answer of why Solomon was chosen comes from his background. Andrew Solomon's father, Howard Solomon, was the CEO for the pharmaceutical giant Forest Laboratories, which produces the drug Lexapro. Coincidentally, according to Solomon's article, Lexapro was a drug prescribed by doctor Fox to Adam. The article states that Adam discontinued use of this drug, thus, giving the illusion that if only kept up his dosage, the entire Sandy Hook event would have never happened. Now keep in mind, the police report contradicts Solomon's article as it doesn't mention Lexapro as the drug prescribed to Lanza. Instead, it mentions Selexa. Now shockingly, Celexa is the drug that turned Solomon's Forest Laboratories into a giant. Let's quickly take a look at the police report to cover the specifics. Kathleen Koenig, the nurse specialist working alongside doctor Paul Fox gave her testimony to the police. She stated that Celexa was the drug prescribed to LANSA and that Nancy Lanza was, quote, non compliant, unquote and giving Adam the prescribed dosage. According to the police report, Koenig attempted to convince her that Celexa was not causing any adverse reactions Adam may be experiencing. And according to Solomon, Koenig was worried about Adam Lanza never taking psychotropics again. Ironically, Andrew Solomon, the man telling the story of Adam through Peter, grew up mentally ill. For years, he battled depression, going to extremely bizarre measures as to even travel to foreign lands and try shamanistic tribal blood rituals to cure his illness. To quote Solomon, so I sat there naked and completely covered in animal blood with flies gathering as they will when you're naked and covered in animal blood, and I drank a Coke. Growing up, Solomon was surrounded by psychotropic drugs. According to his story, he eventually found a way to cure his depression through an undisclosed cocktail of pharmaceuticals. Now, while promoting the drug, Celexa, his father would use him as the poster boy of how pharmaceuticals could change one's life. So here we have the Adam Lanza story of a mentally disturbed kid. This continue his use of psychotropics, ultimately leading to a mass shooting event. And then we have on the other side, Andrew Solomon story of where psychotropics cured a lifelong battle of depression. Is there anybody out there that does not see a clear angle here? Oh, and I forgot to mention that Andrew Solomon is a member of the elitist council on foreign relations, the most influential think tank in the US. Even more bizarre is the fact that all of Adam Lanz's alleged psychiatrists were from the Yale Child Study Center, and doctor Ezra Griffith, a psychiatrist from Yale University, was appointed by governor Malloy to sit on the Sandy Hook advisory commission to recommend mental health care in the state. Now Yale's Child Study Center even testified before the commission. Talk about a major conflict of interest. Mental health, just like any other illness, is a serious problem. There are proper ways to handle it. Pushing pills, psychotropics, and pharmaceuticals in a society that is already overly vaccinated is not one of them, especially not from a large pharmaceutical corporation like Forest Laboratories who has several multimillion dollar lawsuits against them. One of which is for deceptively and unlawfully marketing the adolescent depression drugs Lexapro and Celexa by using misleading drug labels and paying people to endorse them. And it goes without saying, that using a fabricated event to push for certain agendas is about as morally unjust as you can get. The preceding documentary was just a tip of the iceberg on the avenue that is Sandy Hook. As one delves deep into the endless intersections and rabbit holes of research, one can't help but see a single constant theme. That is the overwhelmingly consistent approach by the authorities to conceal and redact any critical information that might prove or disprove this event. Is it too much to ask Speaker 3: for the Connecticut state police to release the mass evacuation video that they claim to have on their dash cams? Evidence that shouldn't be harmful or disrespectful to anybody. As we have seen, the police dash cam timeline does not match what is alleged to have occurred. With this knowledge, we can only conclude that the Connecticut State Police have lied. Speaker 5: Or what about information regarding Adam Lanza? As the alleged killer, any release of Lanza's information should not be disrespectful or traumatizing. So where is Lanza's driver's license in the crime scene photos? Why was he allegedly carrying his brother's ID? And why don't we see Speaker 3: a copy of that in the photos? If the Ryan Lanza ID story was fabricated, then why was he brought into custody miles away from the crime scene in New Jersey? There are endless questions that need to be answered. We're not going so far as to ask for potentially gruesome pictures of deceased bodies or pools of blood consistent with a mass shooting. But because the Connecticut State Police has redacted Speaker 4: much less traumatizing information, one can't Speaker 3: help but ask, do these photos even Bulldozing the school to the ground instead of making renovations and a $50,000,000 destruction and rebuilding Speaker 5: rebuilding project in which consigl construction was required to sign a gag order, only adds even more fuel to the fire. Was the demolition done to conceal the truth of Speaker 3: what happened that day? Whatever the case is, merely gathering, collecting, and knowing all of the anomalies, inconsistencies, and lies within the Sandy Hook narrative does us no good until some sort of action takes place. A type of action that may convict possible conspirators. This is where you step ahead. Independent media solidarity is the name we chose to represent our loose knit group because of our shared interests. One of those interests is the purported shooting that took place in Sandy Hook, Connecticut. As individuals, we have proposed unique solutions and strategies to resolve this problem. And by resolving the problem, we mean to achieve full disclosure of what took place on that day and of related matters. Full disclosure is the goal. We are confident that what is disclosed will be shocking and of the utmost concern to most Americans. From the antisocial teenager rebelling against their parents to the middle aged 5 time juror and veteran of the Gulf War who has a strong sense of patriotism, the stark reality of what their government is capable of will likely cause an unprecedented interest in preventing these things from happening again. And through that shared interest, a national conversation and debate over the issues, we believe a solution will be found. However, there is no one size fits all strategy of achieving that disclosure that would satisfy us all. Thankfully, we all share the common goal of disclosure to build upon. The consensus amongst the group is that the Sandy Hook event largely or entirely fraudulent. To what degree is not certain. The extent of the criminality and how far it reaches into other areas is likewise not certain. However, the group is equally or even more concerned about the greater implications, the ripple effect. You may have seen for yourself how this totally repugnant act has already taken its toll on our society. It's nothing less than ongoing terrorism, but it's a scale and one that not all of our neighbors can see as clearly as we do. Does it really matter whether the purpose was to usher in gun control measures or to gain more stringent control over us by widening the net of mental health diagnosis or to demoralize us so we accept even more unaccountability of government? We think you'll agree that any degree of fraud committed for any purpose is not good for our nation and our world. If you agree, then please help us do what has to be done to achieve the disclosure we seek. But before I explain exactly how you can help, I want to briefly attempt to answer any remaining objections. We don't intend at this point to change the minds of those who accept the official account as legitimate and truthful. Neither do we want to fall into the trap of debating the legitimacy of the event when not having access to the information puts us all at a disadvantage. The point of the presentation you just watched is to sufficiently arm you with the information available and what was found in our investigation. Information that led us to overwhelmingly conclude that the official account is not trustworthy. Some people object to any solution that involves challenging government authority. Even though they may strongly suspect that crimes have occurred, they doubt that the people have the right to accuse their public officials, or they may simply think that no mechanism exists to force officials to turn over anything that hasn't already been turned over. To these people, we first caution them that it's not uncommon for people to harbor misplaced respect for authority that was never earned in the first place. We've all heard the point being made that politicians lie, and there is exponential growth in examples of public officials shirking their responsibilities and committing crimes ranging from embezzlement to treason. The result of countless debates and determinations throughout history is a general consensus that governments should only be granted as much authority as they were deserving of. Not all people, even those very suspicious of the Sandy Hook event, think it warrants an organized response. Some argue that given all the conflicts and crises taking place here and elsewhere, their time would be better spent in efforts to resolve other problems or they doubt that anything that could be achieved would benefit them in any direct way. So it's a value proposition where they don't see much value. To these people, we suggest they consider this. Think of this as a crime of conspiracy and consider the possibility that the conspirators could be convicted, effectively preventing their ability to commit further crimes. It's very hard to gauge but still very likely that other crimes yet to be connected in any way to the Sandy Hook conspirators have taken place or will take place. Convicting them in this case would likely prevent these future unrelated crimes as well. Lastly, we ask that you not disregard the impact on our society's thinking that could come from exposing this fraud. We don't think it's unreasonable to expect other suspicious events would come under similar scrutiny. How much would you value living in a world where massive institutional fraud had been exposed and would be much more difficult to attempt ever again? Our final point that we hope will answer any objections to joining your neighbors and taking action to resolve this problem is this. Can you sense that something is amiss in your country? Speaker 4: The time is now. This is a voice we have never been here. This is Speaker 3: And other countries as well. Maybe you sense something far worse is going on, but can't quite pinpoint what it is. We think that whatever the overarching problem that plagues us is, part of that problem is simply secrecy. We lack the information in both national and global affairs to make informed decisions or to simply protect ourselves from harm or misfortune. The appropriate rallying cry might be to wake up and smell the coffee. The media is a powerful but deceptive force that impacts your life. Whether you've been observing this all along or just catching wind of it, the general attitude we have of the press is growing increasingly negative. And the corporate and government sponsored media outlets, rather than respond to the people's interests, are shockingly making matters worse with more content deemed propaganda and refusing to fulfill our request to inform us. Getting back to that sense that something isn't right, picture that reality as a trajectory, a direction we're going in, and we're staying fixed in that direction like we're riding on a rail, no doubt laid by the powerful forces or institutions that have chosen a destination for us of their choosing. Aren't able to help slow our speed or steer us in a direction and aren't able to help slow our speed or steer us in a direction that better serves us. One way or another, this train has to be stopped or derailed. And if it so happens that secrecy is their greatest means to committing crimes and deceiving us, shouldn't we strive to put an end to this secrecy? To do this means we have to start somewhere, and we believe the place to start is Sandy Hook. Means of taking action is simply promoting this video. As you can see, there are a ton of built in social media platforms. Another way to share the video is by good old email. But don't stop at Facebook and Twitter. Remember, you can also quickly share the video through Google Plus, Blogger, Reddit, Tumblr, Pinterest, etcetera. The next way in which you can take action is by sharing our video and our website by posting one of our ad bombs to your Facebook page, social media feed, or blog. But before we look at those, we need to introduce you to the website. The website can be found at mediasolidarity.com. It's the official website for our very unofficial group. While we're at the website, let's look at another way in which you can take action, the forum. The forum is intended to be a place for honest civil discourse and sharing of information in 2 main areas, the evidence related to the event and disclosure strategies. It's in the disclosure strategies topic where we hope will emerge new and heretofore unconsidered ideas for achieving disclosure of the evidence that remains secret. Of course, anyone consulting others or spreading disinformation will have their accounts terminated. A word of caution to the community of disinformation operatives. Those who are currently members of Independent Media Solidarity and the circles we move in are seasoned researchers or investigators with a great deal of experience handling the efforts of those who seek to disrupt our community. Employing similar tactics here is at least a waste of time and at most ill advised.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - December 11, 2024 at 7:30 PM

Saved - December 12, 2024 at 1:16 AM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

OMG Investigates FEMA – Part 3: O’Keefe Sneaks Into Emergency FEMA Locations, Exposes Empty Disaster Recovery Center https://t.co/q2mIOYZLnb

Video Transcript AI Summary

We visited the FEMA State Disaster Recovery Center in North Carolina, where federal employees seemed reluctant to engage. Many staff members had not even seen the disaster areas firsthand, raising concerns about their effectiveness. Local residents expressed feelings of abandonment, noting that most assistance came from out-of-state volunteers rather than government officials. Despite claims of support, the center appeared mostly empty, with employees idly sitting around. Security guards questioned our filming, indicating a lack of transparency. Survivors shared their struggles, highlighting ongoing challenges like lack of power and resources. The situation remains dire, with many feeling hopeless over two months after Hurricane Helene. We aim to uncover more about FEMA's operations and the impact on affected communities.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So we're here at the FEMA State Disaster Recovery Center. They have a a trailer and a huge tent with all types of federal employees inside. Speaker 1: Are you are you guys with FEMA? Speaker 2: FEMA, SBA, and the state. Speaker 0: They're very paranoid about anybody knowing who they are, what their names are. Speaker 3: May I ask what you guys are filming outside? You guys are getting licensed plates, and Speaker 0: you guys are reporting stuff. Yes. It's a federal property. Speaker 3: Okay. So all the footage has to be looked into view by. Speaker 4: Everywhere we go, people don't wanna talk to us. Speaker 5: It makes it look like we're hiding something. Speaker 0: I'm gonna go in there with my head and camera and go in there and get some answers. Speaker 6: We wanted to find out what exactly you guys were doing. Speaker 0: We saw a mostly empty room, and employees were just sitting around. Speaker 7: I haven't witnessed it firsthand. I haven't been to Asheville. Speaker 0: So a major disaster and the very federal employees claiming to be helping have never even laid eyes on the devastation firsthand. Speaker 8: All the help that I've seen come through out there has been from, like, people from out of state. Speaker 7: A majority of the staff deployed to North Carolina hasn't been to Asheville. Speaker 0: It hasn't been to Asheville. So we're here at the FEMA State Disaster Recovery Center. There's very few of these in the state of North Carolina, and they have a a trailer and a huge tent with all types of federal employees inside. Now we're not allowed to be even be on that property with cameras. We're not allowed to film. They're very paranoid about anybody knowing who they are, what their names are, but we got hidden cameras, and and I, James O'Keefe, are gonna go in there with my hidden camera and go in there and get some answers. With our crew in the parking lot and hidden cameras in tow, we headed into one of the disaster recovery centers for FEMA in Polk County, North Carolina. We were immediately greeted by a staff member outside. Speaker 1: Are you guys with FEMA? Speaker 2: FEMA, SPA, and the state. Speaker 0: There was a a massive storm here, and you guys are helping people? Yes. Oh, how how's that going? Speaker 2: It's going great. Speaker 0: Great is not exactly how Helene's survivors were describing recovery efforts. In fact, at a recent Buncombe County Commissioners meeting, residents noted that their local government officials are hardly helping with the rebuilding process. Speaker 9: These people feel abandoned. Speaker 7: We don't wanna have an epidemic of people freezing to death. Speaker 9: I've never seen the lack of public officials coming out and actually trying to help. Picture your family being out there in that. This is the only county in the nation I've ever seen this. FEMA money runs out. Speaker 8: All the help that I've seen come through out there has been from, like, people from out of state. Speaker 0: Every delay means another night that a child sleeps in a car. Speaker 8: We need the government to step up. Speaker 0: In addition to concerns from locals, even our FEMA whistleblower told us she was deployed to the state but never actually set foot in the disaster areas. Speaker 7: I haven't witnessed it firsthand. I haven't been to Asheville. I'd say a majority of the the staff deployed to North Carolina hasn't been to Asheville. Speaker 0: They haven't been to Asheville. Speaker 1: So a Speaker 0: major disaster and the very federal employees claiming to be helping have never even laid eyes on the devastation firsthand. Speaker 6: Hi. I'm Roseanne. I'm I'm the DRC manager. Hello. Just concerned, right, about the people. Uh-huh. There's a lot of misinformation out there. We just wanted to find out what exactly you guys are doing. Okay. So when a person comes in the door, they sign in over there. Yep. They they get a number. Speaker 0: We made yet another perplexing observation. Staff here was telling us that hurricane Helene survivors were getting assistance here in various ways. We saw a mostly empty room and employees were just sitting around. But one ironic thing in the midst of all this red tape that did happen, a staff member came over and admitted he was a fan of mine. Hello. Speaker 9: I'm a big Speaker 3: fan of Speaker 0: yours. Oh, hi. Are Speaker 9: you there? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Nice to see you, brother. It reminded me of the time at the border fence when we were investigating child trafficking, and the border agent said he was a fan. This was as they shuffled young girls into the back of the van onto their way to sponsors, some of whom became victims of sex trafficking. Yes. Huge fan. But as our conversation continued at the disaster recovery center, strategic security corp guards asked more questions. Speaker 3: May I ask what you guys are filming outside? What's that? Speaker 0: What you guys are filming outside? Those are my colleagues out there. Okay. We soon realized that these security guards were from the same company, Strategic Security Corporation, that asked us to leave the FEMA responder lodging site back over in Candler just one day earlier. Speaker 3: What do you guys find? Are you guys are getting license plates and Speaker 0: you guys reporting stuff? Speaker 3: What do Speaker 0: you mean license plates for all the vehicles outside and stuff? Yeah. We're not really license plates right now. Speaker 3: Understand that. Speaker 0: It's it's a federal property. Speaker 3: Okay. So all the footage has to be looked and reviewed by by people. Speaker 0: We found it odd that journalists would have to get approval from the government prior to running their stories. That would inspire us to go deeper into other FEMA facilities and get more unauthorized footage. Speaker 4: Everywhere we go, people don't wanna talk to us. Speaker 5: It makes it look like we're hiding something. Speaker 0: So so we won't we won't be able to film on this area. No. Unless you guys get authorization from FEMA directly. Alright. And, Kyle Pass Fastenich? Okay. Alright. Bye bye. I initially made the journey to North Carolina to see if in fact FEMA officials are hiding information from the public. The images I saw on the ground are heartbreaking. The information incredibly limited. And more than 2 months after hurricane Helene, the survivors' stories are less of hope and more of hopelessness. Speaker 10: Every obstacle that is can even be thrown in my direction has been thrown in my direction, and it's, like, just took the wind out of my sails. Everything I know from my childhood is destroyed. Speaker 7: I have no idea what my future is with the agency, if there will be retaliation or not, but there are still communities without power, without water, without access to cell phones or Internet, and there are people just dying. Speaker 0: Courage is contagious, and we need more brave whistleblowers like Kelsey to come forward and be a part of the mission for change. And speaking of insiders, we got inside information about the next location of the secret FEMA facility we entered with our hidden cameras rolling. Stay tuned for the climax of the OMG investigation into FEMA part 4. In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at the Wellness Company, the ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at the Wellness Company by going to twc.health/omg.twc.health slash omg. That's twc. Help slash omg. And now you can save 50% just by using code OMG at checkout.

@Seaotter369 — Eelco

Posted - December 19, 2024 at 9:10 AM

Saved - January 5, 2025 at 3:33 PM

@Seaotter369 - Eelco

UNRAVELING SANDY HOOK By: Dustin Nemos ~ @TheDustinNemos By: Sofia Smallstorm ⏱️ 1:32:12 https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jd07oCm2Eniq

UNRAVELING SANDY HOOK | by Sofia Smallstorm UNRAVELING SANDY HOOK | by Sofia Smallstorm Source: foundring (@foundring1 on X) https://x.com/foundring1/status/1838994537194438671 On Sale Now - CarbonShield60 Oil Infusions 15% OFF Go to >> https://www.redpillliving.com/NEMOS Coupon Code: NEMOS (Coupon code good for one time use) Sleepy Joe Sleep Aid https://redpillliving.com/sleep If you wish to support our work by donating - Bitcoin Accepted. ✅ https://NemosNewsNetwork.com/Donate ——————————————————————— FALL ASLEEP FAST - Stay Asleep Longer... Without Negative Side Effects. ✅ https://redpillliving.com/sleep ——————————————————————— For breaking news from one of the most over the target and censored names in the world join our 100% Free newsletter at www.NemosNewsNetwork.com/news ——————————————————————— Follow on Truth Social https://truthsocial.com/@REALDUSTINNEMOS Also follow us at Gab https://gab.com/nemosnewsnetwork Join our Telegram chat: https://NemosNewsNetwork.com/chat ——————————————————————— 💵 Please support our sponsors: Protect yourself by buying gold; Nemosnewsnetwork.com/gold Nemos News is 100% listener funded. Thank you for your support in our mission to Break the Cycle of Fake News. If you value our work please consider supporting us with our vetted patriot sponsors! ✅ https://NemosNewsNetwork.com/sponsors Shop Patriot & Detox the Deep State with www.RedPillLiving.com, Home of Sleepy Joe - the world's most powerful all natural sleep formula & The Great Awakening Gourmet Coffee for Patriots. "Our Specialty, is Waking People Up." ——————————————————————— Other Links Learn the Hidden History of Man, Myth, & Mystery Babylon. Learn His Story, as we take you on a guided tour of the greatest conspiracies of all time, and how they all connect together! From Adam & Eve to Fauci the Freemason, and the New World Order. Learn your history, where you fit in creation, and your purpose. Find the Deep States deepest secrets, and prepare to unlearn everything you thought you knew. https:// TheSerapeum.com/hisstory https://TheSerapeum.com - Your Archive of The Hidden History of Mankind, and The Mystery Babylon Religion of The Deep State. https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/category/news/documentaries/ https://theserapeum.com/sinwar-the-origins-of-assault-trannies/ bitchute.com

@naticoineth — IlluminatiCoin

Posted - January 1, 2025 at 9:31 PM

Saved - January 2, 2025 at 6:46 AM

@naticoineth - IlluminatiCoin

PIZZAGATE: A PRIMER (2017) US Government Child Trafficking 👁️🍕 https://t.co/gmXJ2XR7mN

Video Transcript AI Summary

This video discusses the controversial allegations surrounding James Alefantis and his establishment, Comet Ping Pong, which gained notoriety during the Pizzagate investigation. It highlights connections between Alefantis, prominent political figures, and suspicious social media posts that allegedly contain coded language associated with pedophilia. The video also references John Podesta's emails, suggesting coded communications about food that may imply deeper, sinister meanings. It raises questions about the relationships among political elites, art, and possible child trafficking networks, emphasizing the need for serious investigation into these claims. The speaker calls for awareness and action against child exploitation, expressing concern over the lack of official investigations into these allegations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I did not enjoy making this video at all, and if you have any humanity, you're probably not gonna enjoy watching this. But as my mother always used to tell me, sometimes there are things in life you have to do whether you like it or not. For me, this was one of them. Nearly all of the investigative work in this video was not done by me, and my aim here is to simply distill a lot of information down to a manageable size. My purpose is to simply bring the most unbiased approach I possibly can to this highly controversial subject with the full admittance to the viewer that through my own investigations have already come to many very strong opinions. I tell this to everyone who enters into this investigation. Proceed with caution and hold your heart. Everything I'm gonna share in this video is not a direct condemnation or assignment of guilt against anyone because I'm a firm believer in innocent till proven guilty. Any accusation made here is made allegedly. I believe in fairness under the law, and so, accordingly, all mentioned in this video are presumed innocent. Feel free to mirror this video, and please share this with as many people as you can. Oh, and one last thing. If this video has been monetized, it was not done so by me. I refuse to make any money off this whatsoever. And with all of that said, god bless. This is James Alefantis. Alefantis' establishment, Comet Ping Pong, gained worldwide attention when allegations that a pedophile ring was being operated, in part, out of this establishment. This investigation is now known as Pizzagate, and is one of the first ever worldwide citizen investigations. James Alefantis is an entrepreneur and avatar collector and owns a few shops and restaurants in the Washington DC area. Not only is he the proprietor of Comet Pizzeria and Ping Pong, Bucks Fishing and Camping, as well as several other establishments, but according to GQ Magazine, James is the 49th most influential person in Washington DC. Comet Pizza has hosted many Democratic fundraisers and events with one of those Democrats being Hillary Clinton herself. The Federal Election Commission reports that money was donated to James Alefantis and Comet Ping Pong by Hillary Clinton amongst many others. And to top it off, even geopolitical major player George Soros, through his Soros American Bridge pack, sent Alefantis nearly $22,000 at one point. Oliphantus' ex boyfriend is David Brock, an American political agent, author, and commentator who founded the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. In late 2013, Brock founded Correct the Record, which was described by The New York Times as Hillary Clinton's own personal media watchdog. In short, both Brock and Alefantis were heavily involved in the Hillary Clinton campaign and had been major players working in the background of the Democratic Party for a very long time. Mister Aliphantus has, on record, visited the White House at least 5 times, and so it wouldn't be controversial to say that James is connected to some of the most important and influential people in Washington. In fact, here is a letter from Hillary Clinton thanking James for the dinner cooking with the Fratelli Podesta, and here is another Instagram picture where James is photographing president Barack Obama at the White House playing a little ping pong with a young child. James Alefantis is known as Jimmy Comet on Instagram, and online researchers discovered an incredible number of very strange photos, many with very young children, including very disturbing references found on his account. James's account has since been switched to private, but his posts were collected prior to him doing so. Many of the comments and hashtags made on the images of his Instagram account and many other accounts linked to mister Alephantis and Comet Pizza included code words well known and established by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to be codes used by those engaged in acts of pedophilia. For instance, cheese equals little girl, pizza equals girl, hot dog equals boy. You get the point. We're gonna go over several of the pictures in question as it is necessary to give context to the accusations made in this case. Out of respect, decency, and to protect the innocent, the children's eyes have been covered. So the first one we have here is an unnamed baby being fed pizza. The comments say hashtag first pizza and another that says new Comet ad, as in a new ad for Comet Pizzeria. Here's another one, a picture of a German baby doll for sale, and the comments say way overpriced. Now nothing too damning here. Maybe James is a doll collector. Let's move on. Here we find another unnamed baby with the most alarming hashtag of hotard, which is a slang for a ho or whore and a retard or someone that is mentally handicapped. Very strange to write such a thing on a picture of a baby. Here we have another unnamed baby drinking some milk, and notice the hashtag Carys James. We're gonna be seeing a lot more of that as we move on. Here we have another hashtag of Caris James in reference to an entirely different child, and apparently, Caris James loves to spend euros. It's just very odd seeing a child posing with money like this. Here's another unnamed baby in a shopping cart with the hashtag Carys James yet again. And I must mention, the eyes of this girl in the picture are saggy, and she looks really tired. Not sure who this child is and why she is in this basket and why she is being displayed on James' Instagram account. And yet another unnamed or unidentified girl with the hashtag I love chocolate cake. This next image shows a young girl in a beauty pageant, and she is highlighted saying, I just want my pizza, which when knowing the FBI codes means young girl, which is pretty disturbing. Now one or two pictures of a few girls on an Instagram account isn't really a big deal, But when you get so many like this, it really starts to raise questions. Here again, we have 2 unidentified children supposedly born 1 year ago today, as it says, with the hashtag Caris James yet again. Who are these children? Why are the parents not tagged? Why are the names of the children not given? These are all pretty pertinent questions. One of the most disturbing images is the one where this young girl here is taped down to the table while the commenter says, new seating area for your guests, hilar or hilarious. And Kate Damon there tags Caris James yet again. Here's Jimmy comments showing off a pile of pills and bills, and notice in the comments here it says ping pong in London. This next post shows James in an article expressing his love for playing ping pong in Germany as well as in London at a place called doctor Pongs, something we'll revisit later. Here's Jimmy Comet displaying 3 masked children, which was also linked to another very creepy account called mister Solier. Not sure who these children are, how old these children are, what this is a reference to, if this is an art piece. Do the children know this is an art piece? One of the most controversial images is the one where a man here is holding a very young child with what has been identified as a sex bracelet around the man and child's necks. Jimmy comment here tags chicken lovers with a chicken lover defined as a homosexual man who is attracted to underage boys. Yet another hashtag Carys James and the most strange and downright disturbing comments such as what what in the butt? In this next image here, we have a large refrigerated room, and the comments here are just flat out creepy. Just rinse it off when you're done, says one. Just a pile of money under a sheet, says another. Hashtag murder and hashtag kill room are all very alarming. What are these people referring to? Where is this room? Do these people visit it? And if so, what do they do there? The commenter working on my night cheese has the most interesting name for an Instagram account when taking into consideration what cheese means according to the FBI. Working on my night cheese also has a kill room at his artist studio, the pajama factory, and also has friends who are apparently familiar with the hashtag kill room. Here working on my night cheese is welding together a coffee in table or a coffin table with that coffin just about fit for the size of a small child. And this image of the back of a van by mister Knightcheese, is pretty interesting. You can see it seems to be reinforced in the back there like there's a a door or a metal cage or something, and the comment is illuminating. It's like concrete, but plywood, but concrete. What is going on here? What is this van used for? What does workonomonite cheese do for a living? Here is working on my night cheese commenting on another Jimmy comment post asking if James is burying a body. Some of the other images from James's account are very risque. Here we have Comet Pizza being jokingly renamed as the Long Dong Pizza Shop. Someone tagging Comet Ping Pong here with 2 people giving oral pleasure on a giant slice of pizza. And here is another and another and another. In this post, we see the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and it says Democratic Party, Republican Party, and the box checked is pizza party. This post is quite disturbing in that the comments we find someone saying, whip me up a Haitian special, extra cheese, which once again, according to the FBI code words, would mean a young Haitian girl. So obviously, there is something going on here that is a lot more lewd, lascivious, and downright perverse than what any reasonable person would believe should be going on at a children's pizzeria. We'll just leave it at that. Before we move on, I just wanna mention 3 things. All of which are just creepy and in general downright bizarre. First, the name James Eliphantus can basically be translated in French to mean I like children. I offer no other commentary on this other than to point out that fact. 2nd, and please note that this is pure speculation, but interesting nonetheless. Researchers had mentioned that since the hashtag Caris James did not seem to be addressing any specific person, Caris might possibly be a reference to the drug Carisoprodol, which is a muscle relaxer that might be used on alleged victims. And lastly, and this is something that is not speculative at all, the profile picture of James Alephantis or Jimmy Comet is the Greek god, Antinous, who apparently was deified as a living god, and it just so happens that Antinous was sexually attracted to young boys. We'll get back to Jimmy Comet's Instagram in just a bit. This is John Podesta. John Podesta was the chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and has previously served as chief of staff to president Bill Clinton and counselor to president Barack Obama. John has had close ties to Washington for a very long time. John has been in the inner circle of some very, very powerful people within the upper echelons of the Democratic party for a very, very long time. WikiLeaks has released thousands of John Podesta's emails, and after many researchers rifled through them, it was found that there were an enormous amount of strangely worded references to pizza and hot dogs. Needless to say, it is very clear to see that John and many of the people whom he was communicating with are speaking in code. And not only are they speaking in code, but it is the same code that has been well established by the FBI. A few emails worthy of mentioning are here. Here we have an email discussing that the White House is flying in $65,000 worth of hot dogs and pizza. And, yes, you could argue that the White House spends a good deal on high profile events, and, thus, it is silly to assume that this email has anything to do with child trafficking. But, really, $65 to fly in hot dogs and pizza? Who flies in hot dogs and pizza? Does this hot dog and pizza catering service have a name? And $65? At the very least, these people are wasting an insane amount of taxpayer money. Oh, and one last thing. It is protocol that all the food served at the White House is prepared at the White House due to worries of contamination and poisoning and the like. So all the food at the White House is made at the White House. So what does this email mean? This next one is addressed to John Podesta and discusses dreaming of a hot dog stand in Hawaii. Are hot dogs really that good in Hawaii? I've been there, and I was never once told about the legendary Hawaiian Kosher Footlong. What is the name of this hot dog stand? Does this person and John Podesta vacation together? Very odd and very disconcerting knowing what the code word hot dog means. I believe this one comes from Hillary Clinton's emails herself, and it says, with fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch. Enough said. Here's one from James Alefantis to John Podesta, including the Hillary logo with a pizza incorporated into it. Now remember, this is the owner of a local pizza joint, emailing the campaign chairman for a presidential candidate about a logo and saying, do not forward it. What kind of relationship do John and James have? How close is James to Hillary? These seem like pretty important questions. Here's one. I'm coming to town and I'm bringing walnuts. And another email here speaks of walnut sauce. Who writes emails to each other concerning walnuts? I guess maybe people that work at the Diamond Nuts Corporation or Planters Peanuts might, but politicians? All of this makes a whole lot of sense when you realize the FBI code walnuts means a young child of color. This email is very telling. The realtor found a handkerchief map that is pizza related. Why would anyone feel the need to write someone about a pizza related map handkerchief? The FBI has also reported of a handkerchief code with each color of handkerchief apparently having a specific meaning such as oral or anal sex. Even if you knew nothing of FBI codes, you don't need to be Inspector Gadget or Sherlock Holmes to clearly see that these people are speaking in code with one another. Should I play Domino's on pizza rather than pasta? This email is just downright strange. Why would anyone play Domino's on pizza or pasta, and why would they sound almost excited to do it? If we are to take seriously the code words and their meaning, then this email becomes unsettling and sick. This is John writing his brother, Tony, saying that he would love to get pizza for an hour. This email includes an image of a party, what apparently looks like Tony Podesta's house, someone we'll get to in just a bit. And someone emails a couple of pics saying they're capturing the spirit of the evening. And at the party, they have a cutout of the pope. Nothing too damning here other than the query of why would they have a picture of the pope at the house. Email 1037 has an image that was shared by many different people, and the sender here says it doesn't get any better than this. And attached is a file simply called pizza. The attachment shows 2 Asian women biting into the crust of a slice of pizza with a little girl. So what, one might say. An attachment called pizza of people eating pizza? Duh. Where's the conspiracy? The only problem with this is that the people that have been confidently identified in this picture are Euna Lee and Laura Ling, 2 reporters who were supposedly kidnapped after they were reporting on, you guessed it, child trafficking. This last one is just downright gross, and in my opinion, leaves little room for interpretation. Tamara Lozato is sharing her excitement about the reprise of our gang's visit to the farm in Lovetttsville. We plan to heat the pool so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be transporting Ruby, Emerson, and Mauve 11, 9, and 7, so you'll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure. What kind of entertainment involves 3 young children and a grown man in a swimming pool? So, yeah, you get the point. Even the most elementary mind can clearly see that there is something else being discussed here besides hot dogs and pizza and walnuts, and I have yet to find a single researcher to provide an honest and common sense explanation for these private exchanges. One quick thing before we move on, this painting was found in an image of the campaign office of chairman John Podesta, and it shows 2 individuals holding dinner plates about to carve into and what looks like dine on a human being. In other words, this is a painting of cannibalism. Not sure what the artist is representing here, but this is very, very odd. John's love for pizza seems to be a family affair. This is John's brother, Tony. Tony Podesta and his wife Heather were named by GQ to be the 23rd most powerful people in Washington. Tony's website, the Podesta Group, describes him as the following. Many people in Washington can tell you what just happened to you. Tony Podesta helps you change outcomes. Tony is recognized by his peers, the news media, and decision makers across the federal government as the man with the judgment and smart strategic sense to get things done. John, Tony, and James Eliphantos are all close friends and are clearly people who share a lot of similar interests, to say the least. The Podesta brothers have been linked to the disappearance of a young girl named Madeleine McCann after many people online noticed the artist sketches of Madeleine's supposed kidnappers are a dead ringer to the Podesta's. Here are the police sketches overlaid with the pictures of the Podesta brothers. According to emails released by WikiLeaks, John's secretary was handling his emails the days Madeleine went missing. And further, the Podesta brothers have been confirmed to have been staying in Portugal the day of her disappearance at the house of former member of parliament, sir Clement Freud, who is a convicted pedophile and who happened to live a third of a mile down the street from where Madeleine McCann was abducted. An expose of Tony Podesta's house, lifestyle, and art collection were highlighted in Washington Life Magazine. Within the article, we find pictures of his house very clearly displaying art centrally themed around children. In one corner of the house, we find 2 large paintings displaying children laying on the ground. On the couch, we see in another room, stuffed animals on display. The article begins by saying, if you've ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and a glass of wine in hand, you need to befriend super lobbyist, Tony Podesta. Known about town as the legendary political fix it man, Tony has turned his home into a shrine for contemporary art, including some of his favorite artists. The article goes on to say that Tony had recently come from a Hillary Clinton campaign fundraiser and that he has worked for the likes of Walmart, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Wells Fargo, and Lockheed Martin. So no small potatoes there. Finally, the article concludes and says that he regularly opens his house to casual pizza parties, co hosted by his friend, James Alefantis, owner of Comet Ping Pong. We are gonna take a quick look at 3 of the artists mentioned in the article. Louis Bourgeois, Biljana Durzovic, Amerina Abramovic. Tony's first major art purchase and, one according to the article, the piece that has never taken down, is the 2,000 pound bronze statue by Louis Bourgeois called the Arch of Hysteria. According to the National Gallery of Canada, the Arch of Hysteria was created from Bourgeois' interest in the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of pain and fear. The piece was inspired by neurologist Jean Martin Charcot, a physician who sought to represent hysteria by documenting the performances of his female patients. The physical tension of the hysterical arch and intense muscular contraction resulting in immobility and paralysis of the limbs is emblematic of an extreme emotional state. Regardless of the artist, it seems like a very morbid thing to have as you prized possession hanging in your living room. It's also been noted that the arch of hysteria seems to mimic the same position that the serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer would leave his decapitated victims in. The second artist we're gonna look at is Bilzana Durjovic. I'm just gonna present a few of her pieces here without any commentary. The last artist we wish to look at is Marina Abramovic. Marina gained fame during the run up to the 2016 presidential election when it was revealed through the WikiLeaks emails that John Podesta, through his brother Tony, was invited to one of Marina's spirit cookings. Spirit cooking is a performance art where blood, semen, urine, and other bodily fluids are used to paint in a live painting performance. Marina is a well known artist collaborating with the likes of Jay z and is close and personal with Lady Gaga. Apparently, in many Hollywood circles, Marina is a big hit. Now this is all pretty alarming to say the least, but is there anything to really get up in arms about? I mean, let's be reasonable. This is just art. Art is defined as the expression of human creative skill and imagination producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power. By your and my opinion, all of this may be creepy and repulsive, but, nonetheless, it is just art. Well, Marina Abramovic was asked about the role of the occult in her art on a Reddit q and a, and she replied this. If you were doing occult magic in the context of an art or in a gallery, then it is art. If you were doing it in a different context, in spiritual circles or private house or on TV shows, then it is not art. The intention, the context, and what it is made defines what art is or not. As found in the WikiLeaks emails, even Hillary Clinton herself is invited to and apparently might occasionally attend these sort of spirit cookings. The fact that a presidential candidate and her campaign chairman are being invited by close personal friends to a cooking of these sorts is something I would assume that the voting public would probably like to know. It might be pertinent to point out here that Hillary and Bill Clinton have a laundry list of cohorts and associates that have been busted for child trafficking or pedophilia. I'm just gonna briefly mention a few here. First, we have Laura Silsbee, former director of the New Life Children's Refuge, was caught trying to steal 33 children. It was discovered that Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's confidant and top aide, had been forwarding emails directly to Hillary about Laura Silsbee's organization, and there is evidence that Hillary worked directly with getting Silsbee off the hook. Next up is Jeffrey Epstein, another very interesting character in this whole thing. In 2008, Epstein was convicted of soliciting sex from an underage girl and quietly paid settlements to scores of alleged victims who claimed that he had serially molested them as well as countless other victims. Several women have come out since then claiming that Epstein and his powerful network of friends have continually trafficked children for sex on his private island in Saint Thomas. Jeffrey Epstein's now famous little black book, recovered by Epstein's house manager, reads like a who's who of political and social elite. Former president Bill Clinton, president-elect Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew all hitch rides on Epstein's private planes and visited his private island. And then we have Christopher Kloman, convicted pedophile, who according to the Washington Post, molested girls less than 10 times from 1966 to 1985. Klawman was a close personal friend of Ken Starr, who was a former Clinton prosecutor. And then there is Anthony Weiner, former member of the United States House of Representatives involved in 3 sexual scandals related to sexting or sending explicit material by his phone. Weiner's now ex wife, Huma Abedin, is once again a close confidant and Hillary Clinton's once top aide. And then, of course, there's Denny Hastert, the 51st speaker of the house of representatives and the longest Republican to hold the post, also a convicted pedophile, busted in the seventies for child molestation. Denny is apparently still a friend of the Podestas today and is even mentioned in the WikiLeaks emails discussing sending Denny to an undisclosed location. Another very interesting connection to the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation is Monica Peterson. Monica Peterson was the assistant director at the Human Trafficking Center who worked in Haiti, and it has been claimed that she had been highly critical of the Clinton Foundation and their possible role in child trafficking. Monica Peterson was found dead of an apparent suicide. According to the Washington Post, the Clintons played a major role in recovery efforts in Haiti after the devastating earthquake in 2010. Former president Bill Clinton was the public face of the US efforts in Haiti through several recovery roles. He was the United Nations special envoy to Haiti, coleader of the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund with former president George w Bush, and co chairman of the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission. The Clinton Foundation raised more than $30,000,000 for Haiti relief projects. There's a lot of criticism lodged against the Clintons for their involvement with the recovery efforts in Haiti, many by the Haitian people themselves claiming that they never received the donations or promises made to them. There are serious questions as to how much Monica Peterson knew about the Clintons and their relationship with Haiti. One major angle to all this is found once again by focusing on information secured by those at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. People within the pedophile community apparently have logos and symbols they use to identify each other. A few from the FBI are posted here. So as you can see, spiral triangle means boy lover, the heart within a heart means little girl lover, etcetera. Comet Ping Pong on their menu had a logo similar to the child lover logo. The words play, eat, drink are displayed inside the paddles, and this just so happens to be an acronym for ped, or pedophile for short. And what can only be more than coincidental, these logos are used in businesses surrounding Comet Ping Pong. Besta Pizza clearly was using a pedophile symbol in their logo till it was recently changed after the scandal broke. Besta is Portuguese for beast, or in other words, their shop is called Beast Pizza. Besta Pizza is owned by a man named Andrew Klein, who just happens to be the director for the human trafficking prosecution unit of the Department of Justice. Just down the way is politics and prose, which is co owned by Lisa Muscatine, who has been a Hillary Clinton supporter and speechwriter for over 20 years. We also have Beyond Borders, a foundation who works to end child slavery and prevent violence against women and girls in Haiti. And 2 stores away from Beyond Borders is Terasol Bistro and Artisan Gallery, which has displayed yet another FBI pedophile logo. To put it bluntly, it has been strongly implied by many who have invested time and commitment into this investigation that the corroborating circumstantial evidence leads to the very real possibility that the owners of these buildings, all of whom are connected directly to extremely high level people within our government, might all be involved in child trafficking in one way or another. It also has been speculated mainly through pictures from James Alefantis' Instagram account that there may be tunnels connecting the buildings underground, and this is why we see him doing work in what appears comet ping pong. Though the location of this building isn't tagged in this picture, we can clearly see a ping pong table in the background, which leads us to believe that this image is probably taken at comet ping pong. If James had substantial work done at comet ping pong, to the best of my knowledge, he never obtained a permit from the city to do any of the renovations. It is no secret that there is a network of underground tunnels beneath the architecture of Washington, DC. Though many of the tunnels are said to be out of use, some of them have been reappropriated including one turned art gallery called the DuPont Underground and art display open to the public. Once again, this tunnel network is only mentioned here as something to take into consideration. One reason this is mentioned is that James recently said in an interview that there is no basement at Comet Ping Pong, and yet in an article a few years prior, he says this. We harvest a whole crop of organic tomatoes, 10 tons of tomatoes every year, can them all, store them in the basement, have like a harvest party when it gets loaded in. Seems like a very strange thing to lie about. I can't think of any reason to lie about having or not having a basement unless there is something hidden in that basement. Getting back to James Aliphantus' Instagram account. Mister Barack Obama seen here, captured by mister Aliphantus himself, seems to enjoy a game of ping pong now and again. The first lady, Michelle Obama, plays as well, even taking what was deemed by the White House as a personal trip to China to have a hand at the paddle. Of course, this could be because of the long tradition of ping pong diplomacy, which is, according to Wikipedia, the exchange of table tennis or ping pong players between the United States and the People's Republic of China starting in the early 19 seventies. So all of this love for ping pong could simply be referring to diplomacy with other countries, or it could mean something else entirely. Joe Biden has the most disturbing thing on his own Instagram giving the president of the United States, the leader of the free world, a children's friendship bracelet, one with a pizza on it. On James's Instagram account, he mentions a place that he likes to go when in Germany called doctor Pongs, located in Berlin, owned by a man by the name of Oliver Miller. On Doctor Pong's website, we see a seedy sort of underground dive bar looking ping pong place, obviously not geared towards children, whose website is extremely sketchy and weird to say the least. You can check it out yourself. The menu on the site is the weirdest thing of all. And in one of the lines, it says, sticky as a long slow summertime fuck. Sounds delicious. Comet Ping Pong and Doctor. Pong's website are hosted by the same admin. Apparently, the kind of ping pong James likes to play is enjoyed in London, Berlin, as well as in Washington DC. Now this isn't the first time that comet ping pong has been accused of deviant immoral and illegal activities. In 2007, Frank Winstead, a member of the Washington DC community, tried warning the neighborhood about what was allegedly going on at Comet Pizza, including lying, cheating, stealing, spitting in customers' food, encouraging murderers and rapists, and all around debauchery. Apparently, Frank was essentially written off as a grouchy old party pooper who had some unsubstantiated grievances towards a local business, and that was that. And maybe old Frank wasn't crazy after all. Comet Ping Pong is supposed to be, at least on the outset, a pizzeria aimed towards children. And it is open from 5 PM to 9:30 PM. And then closed with parties often thrown in the back. This means that essentially Comet Pizzeria makes all of their money in roughly 4 and a half hours a night. This is the bathroom located in Comet Ping Pong, and it shows a man here jerking himself off at a ping pong table. I ask you, does this look suitable for children? Apparently, since the scandal broke, most of the controversial art within Comet Pizza has been removed. Comet Pizza has a close connection and trust with their patrons. Here's a clip of the manager explaining Comet's relationship with its customers. Speaker 1: The The secret is is it's an empowerment. An empowerment by definition is trust. So, like, I trust that the that the relationship that I have with the customers is one where they understand that I'm looking out for them, and in response, they look out for us. Speaker 0: The posters for the bands that play at Comet Ping Pong are very edgy and rather lewd and perverse to say the least. Here are just a few posters of some of the acts that have played at Comet. As it turns out, even some of the bands that play at the pizzeria flash pedophile symbols or logos in their videos, including this one here by a band called Sex Stains. Now remember, this is a children's pizzeria. I can't imagine heading to Chuck E. Cheese's where a kid can be a kid and seeing a band called Sexstains. The promoter for the bands at Comet Ping Pong is Sasha Lord. Sasha Lord previously worked as an outdoor facilitator at Hemlock Overlook, specializing in at risk populations, volunteered with the Girl Scouts of Saniem Council, helping to facilitate Girl Scouts beyond bars. And she also worked for the Girl Scouts of the nation's capital, running an outreach Girl Scout troop at the Prince William County Juvenile Detention Center. So, basically, Sasha Lord has worked with children a good portion of her adult life, and now she is recruited to be a scouting slash talent agent for the backroom of a seedy, very politically connected children's pizzeria. Seems reasonable. This video is of an artist named Majestic Ape, who also goes by Amanda Kliman, apparently, and has performed at Comet with her band Heavy Breathing. The video is of Sasha Lord's birthday party, and you can clearly hear Majestic Abe speaking casually about special pizza and discussing with the crowd the favors that Sasha provides. You can also hear in the crowd people laughing and casually speaking about pedophilia. Speaker 2: It is the day of the birth of our lord. Sasha, Lord. If you are like me, you want Sasha or if you don't, you want perks from her. Things like free pizza. Have any of you enjoyed this special pizza here tonight called the party? And Cheery is known to hang out down here. He likes world sounds. Timeless. And little boys. And children. No. We all have preferences. Speaker 0: Further, Majestic Ape has mentioned pedophilia in her videos casually. To say that all of majestic apes so called art is strange and perverse would be an understatement. Majestic Ape has also worked with an artist named James Huchenpaler. Amanda Kleinman, or Majestic Ape, narrates one of James's musical compositions I found on his SoundCloud. James Huchenpauler has worked with Transformer, the artist centered nonprofit organization that James Alefantis is the board president of, one of the many titles James Alefantis apparently holds. James Huckampaller wrote a 314 page document called meta monument. A PDF available on his website superluckyland.com that describes 10 functional fictions that describe potential uses for the abandoned trolley tunnels beneath DuPont Circle, formerly Pacific Circle. These dreams borrow liberally from cultural spaces in Berlin in an effort to address some of the fundamental challenges posed by the location. And on the last page of this work, it says this. Thanks to Oliver Miller, AKA doctor Pong for hospitality in Berlin, and James Alafantes for patronage above and beyond. It just kinda makes you wonder what kind of hospitality and patronage these guys are offering. The scary thing about all of this is that when you start to dig through the endless material on this subject, following a lot of the leads, going down rabbit hole after rabbit hole, a picture becomes very clear. One showing that hiding beneath the world of high arts and politics, there is a very devious circle of people engaged in this sort of illegal, wicked, and highly immoral behavior. When this story broke, countless researchers, myself included, scoured numerous accounts on Instagram and Twitter and Facebook and uncovered literally hundreds of people engaging one another using these code words, saying things cryptically, and posting images related to such behavior. This is not a joke. Literally hundreds to thousands of people discussing this stuff openly. A Twitter account named at eclipse_ow was banned temporarily for releasing a massive Google doc of 23,000 accounts, including over 500 with their exact geographical locations of people involved in an enormous child pedophile ring. It has recently come to light that this pedophilia is on YouTube as well, with literally, once again, thousands of accounts discussing this stuff openly. Sharing videos of young girls spreading their legs, posing in very sexual or precarious positions, and the like. The comment sections of these videos are littered with perverse and sexually explicit comments about young children, and nothing is being done about it. I can't even show some of the videos here due to the fact that YouTube will probably take this video down, yet leave those accounts up. If you don't believe me, spend an hour or 2 and search for webcam video and peruse some of these seemingly randomly uploaded videos. From my own best approximations, there seems to be literally an entire subculture created around pedophilia and child trafficking. Conservative reporter Andrew Breitbart, founder of Breitbart.com, spoke of John Podesta and his supposed sex crimes in a tweet from 2011, where he said this. How progressive guru John Podesta is in a household name as a world class underage sex slave op cover upper defending unspeakable dregs escapes me. Andrew Breitbart dropped dead of a heart seizure in early 2012. Make no mistake about it. Rampant pedophilia and child sex slave trafficking at the highest levels of society and government is something that people have been claiming and discussing for years. The Hollywood aspect of this whole scandal is pretty intense too, and it is a rabbit hole I will only briefly touch on here. The amount of celebrities, especially childhood actors and entertainers, that seem to be tied up in all of this is pretty damn alarming. Hollywood actor Elijah Wood, a household name, has come out and discussed openly that there is a pedophile ring happening within the underbelly of Hollywood and has been operating for years. Katy Perry has been known to have a fascination for pizza, even donning a pizza onesie, and Miley Cyrus has long been known to have some obscene obsession with pizza as her entire Instagram account seems dedicated to this Italian food. It has been alleged for a long time that famed childhood actor Macaulay Culkin has been the victim of this Hollywood occultist, drug addled pedophilia network, especially with his ties to the likes of Michael Jackson. Culkin now fronts an alt rock art pop band called the Pizza Underground, where the band plays covers of Velvet Underground songs, except changes the songs in the pizza related themes. Their debut music video shown here is quite disturbing. When you start to include the fact that Jay z is linked to Marina Abramovic and his lady Beyonce was spotted wearing a ring of Baphomet, literally a ring of the devil on a live TV performance, you gotta start asking some serious questions as to what kind of lifestyle do these people embrace in private. Lady Gaga, Madonna, and Katy Perry have all performed essentially occult rituals on stage at various music award shows. With eyes wide open, the connections you can start to make are obvious, blatant, and at other times, deeply unresting. I can only briefly mention here the government mind control program of MK Ultra, the predecessor to the supposed project Monarch program. Yes. The government, by their own admission, was literally experimenting on people with and without their knowledge for years, at least since 1950. This subject is a documentary in and of itself, but let's just say MK Ultra and the government mind control programs undoubtedly play an enormous role in understanding this network of control. Though MK Ultra on record was supposedly shut down, there is no getting around the fact that this stuff happened. I I think it would be extremely naive to believe that the government, under some guise or veil, isn't continuing these types of programs today. Many of the so called Hollywood stars and famous figures could very well be mind controlled slaves, controlled by forces at work within the United States government. If you think this kind of thing is a ridiculous notion, I understand your doubts. But no matter what your opinions are, this stuff is real, and it did happen. The fact is accusations of a massive pedophile ring have happened many times before. The Australian government had a massive pedophile scandal, and there was an expose done on it on 60 minutes, which to the best of my knowledge never aired in the United States. Numerous researchers have discussed England's own supposed scandals with the claims that many within the celebrity culture, including cultural icon and BBC legend, Jimmy Saville, are involved in sex slave, murder, and child trafficking amongst other things. We have the Franklin cover up in the states, which is another very interesting case, in which it was claimed that the entire Institute of Government and the media itself colluded on covering up a pedophile ring, going so far as to call the FBI the orchestrator and architect of the child trafficking ring. Former president senator John DeCamp was involved in the production of a documentary called A conspiracy of silence, which you can watch on YouTube, was set to air on May 3, 1994 on the Discovery Channel, exposing a network of religious leaders and Washington politicians who flew children to Washington DC for sex orgies. But right before the show was to air, an unknown congressman threatened the TV cable industry with restrictive legislation if the documentary was aired, and thus it never saw the light of day. And last but not least, we have the Hampstead cover up. The Hampstead case was the most gruesome indictment of this sort of thing I have ever witnessed with direct accounts from children who were victims of satanic ritual abuse. These children claimed kidnapping, torture, blood rituals, sex, murder, and even cannibalism. The Hampstead cover up and the implications of it are prime examples of how many different times a child trafficking pedophile ring, a satanically based sex slave ring, has been brought to light by the children affected directly by such madness. I wanna include the following audio from the Hampstead case of 1 of the children who gave a testimony and police confession discussing these actions in her own words. I encourage you to go online and listen to the testimony from these children and the retractions that these children gave, and decide for yourself if you think that these children were lying. Out of respect, I have not included the child's name or face to the alleged victim. I just wanna say this once again to reiterate. These children retracted their testimonies and the claim perpetrators were never charged with anything. Speaker 3: Who's they? Who's they? The teachers, the parents, the staff. The teachers, the parents, the staff. Every single teacher or specific teachers? No. Every single the whole school does it. The whole the whole school, and we've got our own church. Yeah. To so we so because they do the because after as I said, we kill babies, we drink their blood, we eat them. But then after, we we so the social services who are in it Yeah. They they said they go to families or so they go to the families can't afford so they got a baby, but they can't look after it. Or anything, they can't buy food or the they can't buy clothes. They can't look after it. So they sell the families who sell their children Yeah. To the social services get them, they said they get them to a foster home, but they don't. Right. Okay. So then they because our dad, he forces me to do it. But because we can't, we're not strong enough to cut the baby's head off. He tells us to hold an eye, and he puts his hand at the top of our hand. And he helps us to cut the baby's head off because he's learning. He's he's teaching me and so when we're older to do it to our own children and do this kind of stuff to our own Speaker 1: children. Speaker 3: Where is it this that happens? The, the church. In the kitchen in our church. Speaker 0: What you have just watched is just a smattering of some of the investigative work that has been made in this massive online citizen investigation. And I ask you, the viewer, to ask yourself, is this fake news? Is there enough evidence, even if circumstantial and indirect, to warrant a serious investigation into these matters? In my opinion, if I was an FBI investigator working cases in the child trafficking unit and somebody came up to my desk and plopped in front of me everything you just watched with the sources, the encrypted emails, the images, the links, the connections, the names, everything as it has been collected online, if I was that FBI agent who maybe had a wife and kids, who loved his job, who worked up through the ranks and earned his position because he really wanted to fight people who harm children, if I was that father, I would have peed my damn pants at having been handed such a gold mine of investigative work. Is there, in this case, direct proof of guilt? No. Not necessarily. But investigations don't start with proof. They start with leads, leaks, information, tips, connections, and there is no shortage of those things on this subject. But, alas, there is no investigation being made. No arrests, no search warrants, no questioning, no nothing. Nope. To the best of my knowledge, the whole thing is being ignored by the FBI and the Department of Justice, swept under the rug and deemed a hoax or fake news by the news media. If an earnest and sincere investigation isn't going to be made into this, then it becomes quite clear that the justice system and the FBI no longer function in any honest capacity whatsoever. And what are we going to do about this? By sharing this, by talking openly about it, by letting people know what this is all about, you are, in my humble opinion, doing God's work. And if you were ignoring this, well, every year in the United States alone, something like 800,000 children go missing. 800,000 children. If that number was 5,000, that would be 5,000 too many. This madness needs to stop, and apparently, the hands of the government are going to do nothing about it because apparently, the hands of the government are deeply involved in this. Spread your goodness to the world, be kind to one another, and root out all of this incessant evil. Much love to all.

@naticoineth - IlluminatiCoin

@elonmusk Child Trafficking: Public Schools being used as a Trafficking Pipeline 👁️ https://t.co/KaDcXmKZ02

Video Transcript AI Summary

I noticed metallic posters in student bathrooms promoting hotlines like the national suicide hotline and the Trevor Project. Curious, I texted the suicide hotline about my gender confusion and received guidance to explore my gender. I visited trevorspace.org, which is for ages 13 to 24, and found discussions among kids expressing loneliness and seeking friends. There were various chat spaces, including those for non-binary individuals and even a regressor space where older individuals could identify as younger. I believe schools are becoming a pipeline for human trafficking, particularly affecting vulnerable LGBTQ kids. When I spoke at the National Educators Association about the Trevor Project, I was abruptly cut off, indicating its sensitive status.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I noticed in our bathrooms that there were these metallic posters bolted into every student bathroom starting in kindergarten, giving the national suicide hotline, the Trevor Project, which is a LGBT suicide hotline, and a bully hotline. And so I thought and it was on my 5 year old level. And I thought, you know, I'm gonna text this hotline and pretend to be a kid and see what they say. So I texted the national suicide hotline, which is 988, and I said, I'm unsure of my gender. I'm scared about puberty. What should I do? Now, of course, they made sure that I wasn't gonna commit suicide, so they asked all the proper questions. But then they wanted to know know my age, but I didn't give it. Then they said, well, you're not gonna commit suicide, so we see that you just need to explore your gender. And then they sent me a Trevor Space text, and they said, this is where you can go to explore your gender in a safe place. So I did exactly what they told me to do. So when I went I went to trevorspace.org, it said it was for 13 to 24 year olds. I saw kids talking. I'm assuming they were kids, but some were saying, I'm lonely and need a friend. I saw a lot of that, and somebody would pop in and say, I'll be your friend. Hugs, hugs. Then I saw chat spaces like the chosen family, so we'll be a new family if your parents don't agree with this. They had non binary pals. They had, the furries club pretend to be an animal. They had the regressor space, which is age identity, means that you can be a 50 year old man and say that you're a 16 year old girl. They had a gay men's club, but the tagline was let's talk about boys. I turned it into homeland security. I believe strongly that this our schools are being used as a pipeline to human trafficking because of these things. And I think they're actually the kids that are most vulnerable are the kids identifying as LGBTQ. Those are the kids being thrown into human trafficking. I spoke at the National Educators Association. They let me speak. But when I brought up the Trevor Project, the president, Becky Pringle, cut me off immediately. The Trevor Project is a sacred cow. You cannot touch it.

@Hal9000_T1 — Dr. KHAL

Posted - January 11, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 9:48 PM

@Hal9000_T1 - Dr. KHAL

"Occupation of the American Mind" Documentary every American should watch. Pass it around. https://t.co/cpFIFHns9l

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2014, Israel launched a devastating attack on Gaza, resulting in thousands of Palestinian casualties. Despite global outrage, American public opinion remained largely supportive of Israel, influenced by media coverage that often frames the conflict from an Israeli perspective, emphasizing Israel's right to self-defense against Palestinian terrorism. This narrative overlooks the historical context of Palestinian dispossession and the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967. Israel's PR efforts, which began after the Lebanon invasion in 1982, aim to shape American perceptions by portraying Israel as a victim and downplaying the impact of the occupation. While international consensus supports a two-state solution based on pre-1967 borders, Israel continues to expand settlements. The US government's backing of Israel further complicates efforts to achieve a just resolution.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: On 07/08/2014, Israel launched a devastating military attack on the Gaza Strip. Over the course of fifty one days, the Israeli military dropped nearly 20,000 tons of explosive on Gaza, a densely populated area the size of Philadelphia, killing over 2,000 Palestinians and wounding tens of thousands more. The overwhelming majority of these casualties were civilians. Speaker 1: This strip of land is being bombarded from the air, sea, and land. Speaker 2: Israel launched at least a 60 strikes on the Gaza Strip. Speaker 3: And there's one less hospital in Gaza now. Israel today flattened Waffah Hospital. Speaker 0: The sheer scale of the attack sparked outrage and condemnation around the world. Speaker 1: Israel's Month long pounding of Gaza shocked many people around the world. Mass demonstrations have been held in many of the world's major cities. Bring good. Speaker 4: Bring good. But Speaker 0: in The United States, the story was different. Polls showed the American people holding firm in their support for Israel. Speaker 5: This is the latest CNN ORC poll of Americans shows 57% of those polls say Israel's action in Gaza is justified, 34% say unjustified. Speaker 0: These numbers were striking, but they weren't new. Over the course of a conflict in which Palestinian casualties have far outnumbered Israeli casualties, the American people have consistently shown far more sympathy for Israelis than for Palestinians. Speaker 6: It's very difficult to divorce public opinion on any question from the media coverage that people rely on to form opinions. And I think the most prevalent lesson from looking at the coverage is that the coverage tends to see this conflict from the Israeli side. Speaker 7: Study after study has demonstrated that Israeli perspectives dominate American media coverage. So by far, the most common thing we've heard is that everything comes down to Israel's right to defend itself. Speaker 8: Israel is a state that implements its right to defend itself and its citizens. Speaker 3: It is a talking point that is set from the top. And by the top, I mean from the highest officials, government officials who are commenting on this issue, which the media obsessively covers and repeats. Speaker 9: A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do, and you'd say a country's gotta do what a country's gotta do. We have to defend ourselves. Speaker 3: In the most recent war in 2014, when we looked at mainstream media outlets, almost by a margin of of three to one, Israeli spokespeople overrepresented compared to Palestinian spokespeople. So almost every time you turned on the screen, there was a Israeli representative on the screen telling you Israel is the one that's in a position of defense. It is being attacked. Speaker 10: And basically, Israel is saying, hey. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that if rockets fly in your head, you're allowed to defend yourself. Speaker 3: Add to this the fact that you have American elected officials also reinforcing Israel's right to defend itself. Speaker 11: As I've said many times, Israel has a right to defend itself against rocket and tunnel attacks from Hamas. Speaker 3: And you hear some of the same framing by anchors who reiterate and reinforce many of the same talking points that the Israeli official spokespeople are making. Speaker 12: Israel has the right to defend itself against Hamas, of course, a group that is firing rockets on Israel coming out of tunnels to attack Israelis. Speaker 3: That imbalance there was very significant in shaping the way the the public understood this conflict. Speaker 13: I worked in European media for a long time. The coverage is the opposite. There's Palestinian legislators, Palestinian thinkers, Palestinian intellectuals, pro Palestinian thinkers, many voices. Speaker 8: So let me say very very frankly, it's very easy to blame the victim. It's very easy to pull out a terrorist label. Speaker 13: You come to America and you think that you're an alien. You're looking at a different world or a different planet, And I'm thinking, what's going on here? Speaker 14: When a narrative is so dominant Thousands of rockets without any visible descent or complication, it's it's extremely difficult to make clear to people that it is it is basically a propaganda story. Speaker 15: Israel is under siege by a terrorist organization that is Speaker 14: How do you make that clear when the mainstream spectacle is so unrelenting and total? Speaker 7: We hear over and over again that the conflict comes down to Palestinian terrorism and Israeli security. And what gets pushed out of the frame entirely is the fact that that for almost fifty years, Palestinians have been systematically dispossessed from their land and denied their most basic human rights. Speaker 16: Pioneers and refugees from countries of the oppression, young and old, they are going now to a land which accepts them. They will march to their work in the Jewish settlements to build roads, to quarry stones. They will drill wells to restore to Palestine soil its long neglected fruitfulness. Speaker 0: Zionism, the nationalist movement that emerged in Europe in the late eighteen hundreds, was dedicated to the idea that the Jewish people, after centuries of living as persecuted minorities within other countries, were entitled to a state in historic Palestine, the biblical homeland of the Jews more than three thousand years before. But there was a basic problem with the choice from the start. Palestine was already home to hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs who had been living in Palestine for centuries, first under the rule of the Ottoman Empire and since World War one under the control of the British Empire, and for decades had aspirations of their own for an independent state in Palestine. Tensions steadily escalated during the nineteen thirties, placing more and more pressure on the British colonial government to reconcile the competing interests of both sides. After World War two and the Holocaust, the situation reached a break point. Ultimately, the British colonial government made the decision to withdraw and to pass the problem on to the newly created United Nations. In 1947, UN resolution one eight one recommended that Palestine be split into two parts. Jews, who were a third of the population, would receive 56% of the land. Palestinians, who were two thirds of the population and possessed more than 90% of historic Palestine, would receive 44%. These terms were immediately rejected by Arab leaders as unfair, but in the spring of nineteen forty eight, Zionist leaders declared Israel a state along the proposed borders anyway, triggering the first Arab Israeli war. Speaker 17: Arab armies set out to destroy the newly born nation that suffered repeated defeat. Speaker 0: After winning a crushing victory, Israel took possession of even more land. By the time armistice was declared in 1949, Israel controlled 78% of historic Palestine. The creation of the new state would be celebrated by Israelis as a triumph. But to this day, it is commemorated by Palestinians as the Nakba, the Arabic term for the catastrophe, in memory of the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who were driven from their homes to make way for the new Jewish state. All told, approximately 700,000 people, more than half of Palestine's native population were uprooted. Speaker 3: There's a lot of sympathy that can be generated, and I think rightly so, for what Jewish people as a whole have dealt with in Western societies and globally because of antisemitism. The question then becomes, what is the proper response to that? The Zionist answer is, of course, statehood. And there's many people who would sympathize with that if it was in fact done in a vacuum and if it was in fact done for a people without a land in a land without people. The reality is that's just not the way that it happened. There were people here. They lost their homes, their Speaker 18: livelihood, their nation, their everything. This was a land in 1910 that was 93% Palestinian Arab and 7% Jewish. How did it suddenly become 80% Jewish and 20% Palestinian? This was not a normal demographic transition. This was a consequence of Israel's desire to create a Jewish state, and to do that, it had to get rid of as many Palestinians as possible. There's other more complex factors, but that's cutting it to its bare bones as we see it. Speaker 19: That is, I think, in a certain sense, the core of the conflict. The Palestinians have suffered inordinately as a result of the creation of Israel. The creation of a Jewish state in a country that had an Arab majority necessarily and inevitably caused them irreparable harm. Speaker 20: The Palestinians used the term catastrophe to speak of the 1948 consequences when they lost their land the first time around. In '67, it was another Nakba, another catastrophe. Speaker 0: In June of nineteen sixty seven, Israel won what was perceived as a stunning underdog victory over much larger Arab armies during the Six Day War. With victory, in addition to taking land from Egypt and Syria, Israel began to militarily occupy all remaining Palestinian territory in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. Speaker 20: Suddenly, all of Palestine is now lost. We now had no Palestinian land left under Palestinian control. You had a huge Palestinian population living as refugees or living under occupation. Palestinians are governed under military law. They are essentially prisoners. They are treated as if they were all prisoners of war. They have no rights. Speaker 0: In the immediate aftermath of the sixty seven war, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution two four two. Citing international law forbidding the takeover of territory by war, two four two explicitly called for Israel to withdraw its armed forces. But to this day, Israel has largely failed to comply, not only holding Palestinian territory, but confiscating additional land and building massive Jewish settlement blocks in the West Bank and East Jerusalem in direct violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which expressly forbids states from transferring civilian populations into territory it occupies. In addition, Israel has established an entire matrix of security control on Palestinian land to secure these settlements, including checkpoints that prevent Palestinians from traveling freely within their own land and a 440 mile security wall along the Israeli border that cuts into Palestinian territory. Speaker 3: We're talking about massive denial of human rights for millions of people. At the most basic level, the government that is ruling over these people is is not a government in which these people, the Palestinians, have a voice. Speaker 7: There's really no way to fully understand why the Palestinian people have resisted Israel for so long without understanding this basic history of dispossession and occupation. But for the most part, this isn't the story we get in American media coverage. Instead, the legitimate grievances of Palestinians, including their right to resist an illegal military occupation, get pushed out of the frame by this constant discussion about extremism and terrorism and antisemitism. Speaker 21: You know, rational, clear minded people understand that Hamas is a terror group, and it is, committed to killing Jews and wiping Israel off the face of the earth. That's not debatable. That's a fact. Speaker 20: It's never about land somehow. That gets dropped out. It's never about settlements. It's always about they hate us because we're Jewish. Speaker 19: Whatever the Palestinians have done is portrayed in terms of mindless violence against Jews out of some kind of primeval anti Semitism. No sense of how this started, where the animus comes from. It's completely inexplicable in the the the way in which it's generally presented, and these people basically kill because they hate, and they hate because they're irrational Muslim fanatics or whatever. Speaker 9: I think Americans largely get it. They know who the good guys are and who the bad guys are. Speaker 19: This is not an illusion. American public opinion is generally supportive of Israel because it's been led to believe that Israel is in the right and the Arabs are bad guys. Speaker 7: None of this is by accident. It's the result of a deliberate effort to shape American perceptions of the conflict, a propaganda effort that really begins to take shape with Israel's Invasion Of Lebanon in 1982. Speaker 5: Israel unleashed another massive air attack on Palestinian guerrilla targets in Lebanon today. Speaker 19: From the sky, the howl of Israeli jets bombing and bombing. Speaker 22: Tonight, Israel has never been closer to nor more in control of an Arab capital. Speaker 0: In the summer of nineteen eighty two, Israel invaded neighboring Lebanon in an attempt to drive the Palestinian Liberation Organization out of its encampments on the southern border with Israel. Israeli Officials justified the attack as a defensive action required to take out terrorists. But as the story played out on American television, a different narrative began to emerge, one that presented Israel as the aggressor. Speaker 23: What in the world is going on? Israel's security problem on its border is 50 miles to the south. What's an Israeli army doing here in Beirut? The answer is that we are now dealing with an imperial Israel which is solving its problems in someone else's country. World opinion be damned. Speaker 24: The Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 was a watershed. It was Israel breaking out beyond its immediate region to aggressively attack another country, and it was a bit of a shock to many people. Speaker 22: Israel was always that gallant little underdog democracy fighting for survival against all the odds. Now the Israelis have annexed East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights settled down more or less permanently on the West Bank and occupied close to half of Lebanon. In the interests of self defense, that gallant little underdog Israel has suddenly started behaving like the neighborhood bully. Speaker 0: By the time the war was over, the Israeli military would kill seventeen thousand Lebanese and Palestinians and wound another thirty thousand, almost all of them civilians. Speaker 17: In West Beirut, hospitals are so taxed with the injured that they have become specialized. This center takes only burn victims of phosphorus shells. Trapnel cases, concussions, and fractures are directed to other facilities. Speaker 0: And just a few months later, American media coverage would take an even darker turn. Speaker 5: There's been another horrendous turn of events in The Middle East. Hundreds of men, women, and children, perhaps as many as a thousand people in all, have been massacred in two Palestinian refugee camps in West Beirut. Speaker 0: Israel's Lebanese allies, operating with the consent of the Israeli government, had massacred several thousand Palestinian civilians in the refugee camps of Sabra and Shatila, and American news media had the pictures to prove it. Speaker 25: The Israelis permitted an armored column of right wing Christian gunmen to enter West Beirut late Friday. They took up positions surrounding Shatila refugee camp last night, and this morning, they were gone. Speaker 22: A bloody massacre which has heightened tensions between The US and Israel. Speaker 20: Sabra Shatila was hardly the first massacre committed by Israel against Palestinians and against Arabs. There's a dirty legacy of Israeli massacres from the pre state through the creation of the state and beyond. The big difference was this one was televised. Speaker 25: By all appearances, groups of men had been ordered to stand against the wall and then gunned down in cold blood. Speaker 22: Today, Palestinians search frantically for relatives. They took our children, one said. They're killing our families. Speaker 20: This was a game changer in terms of how Israel was going to deal with the question of publicity. They went on the offensive for the first time. Speaker 26: All the direct or implicit accusations that the IDF bear any blame whatsoever for this human tragedy in the Shatila camp are entirely baseless and without any foundation. The government of Israel rejects them with a contempt which they deserve. Speaker 20: It was perhaps the first time they recognized at the highest levels inside Israel how much they needed to do that if they expected to maintain the kind of understood support in The United States. Israel can do no wrong. Israel is always the the victim. Israel is the little David against the big bad Goliath. Speaker 0: Two years after the Lebanon invasion, the American Jewish Congress sponsored a conference in Jerusalem to devise a formal public relations strategy known in Hebrew as Hasbah. Participants included PR and advertising executives, media specialists, journalists, and leaders of major Jewish groups. According to a brochure from the congress, no single event brought home the need for a more effective or information program more persuasively than the nineteen eighty two war in Lebanon and the events that followed. As one conference participant put it, Israel is no longer perceived to be little David, but Goliath steamrolling across the map. The primary aim of the conference was to develop strategies to spin unpopular Israeli policies and to counter negative press coverage by shaping the media frame in advance. News doesn't just jump into a camera, a conference delegate said. It's directed. It's managed. It's made accessible. Israel based advertising executive Martin Fenton would put it in even more blunt terms. Propaganda is not a dirty word, he said. Face it. We are in the game of changing people's minds and making them think differently. To accomplish that, we need propaganda. The conference was chaired by US Advertising Executive Carl Spielvogel, the legendary ad man who created the highly acclaimed Miller Lite beer ads in the nineteen seventies. Speaker 7: The choice of Spielvogel makes perfect sense. He's known as a master of image inversion and rebranding. The ad man responsible for transforming Miller Lite, which had been viewed before as a woman's beer, into a manly beer that tough guys would drink. Speaker 16: But the best part is that it Speaker 22: tastes so great. The best part is it's less philly. No. It tastes great. Less philly. Speaker 7: His job with Israel would require the same kind of rebranding only in the opposite direction to help soften the image of a country that's coming to be seen as a bully. So he recommends creating a cabinet post dedicated exclusively to explaining policy, whose job would not be setting policy but presenting it in the most attractive way to the rest of the world. Speaker 24: Classic PR is to say the problem is not the policy, it's the presentation. When the policies are so reprehensible that many people become critical, Rather than acknowledge there's anything wrong with the policy, there's a doubling down on the PR effort. Speaker 7: After Lebanon, you start to see the basic Hezbollah strategy in action. Images of Palestinians fighting back against Israel's occupation make their way onto American television screens. And the Israeli military crushes this resistance in brutal ways that undercut Israel's image as underdog and victim. Speaker 27: Israeli helicopter gunships deliberately fired a missile into a crowd of civilians last night, killing seven Palestinians and wounding seventy more. Speaker 7: Then Israeli officials go into full Hasbro mode, an act of the occupation doesn't even exist, framing all Palestinian resistance as terrorism and Israeli aggression as self defense. Speaker 9: We will do whatever it takes to defend ourself and defend ourselves, we will. Speaker 7: That's the basic Hasbro strategy in a nutshell. Even when you're violently crushing resistance to your own brutal occupation, portray Israel as an innocent victim by demonizing Palestinians as nothing but terrorists. Speaker 13: The Palestinian terror campaign continues. It only justifies again and again that we Israel have to continue and defend ourselves. Speaker 20: There have been horrific Palestinian terrorist attacks, and I use that word very specifically to mean what terrorism means, which is attacks on civilians for a political purpose. Speaker 27: Anger in Israel today at last night's suicide bomb in Tel Aviv, killed four and wounded around 50. Speaker 20: Those are horrific attacks, which should be condemned. They are violations of international law, period. But the problem is Israeli violence is assumed to be legitimate because it's always self defense. Speaker 28: Some of the people who have been killed are said to be civilians. In fact, two of them are said to be, little girls. But the Israeli military says they try to the best of their knowledge to make sure whoever they are striking was a known militant. Speaker 8: All the cases when Palestinian people were killed by the Israeli military, and this is not called acts of terror, and one should ask why if it is civilians who are being killed but from a plane and not by a suicide bomber, why this is not terror and only terrorist when somebody is killed by a suicide bomber? Speaker 24: If the terrorist label can only be affixed to one set of people but not another set of people, then you're in an Orwellian zone. You're down a rabbit hole of linguistic manipulation. Speaker 9: The last thing they want is a political settlement. What they want is more demonstrations, more riots, more bodies. That's what they want. Speaker 3: And so this becomes the framing of the situation. Israel is defending itself, which means Israel is not the aggressor here. That doesn't square with the reality on the ground, and we know that. You have a right to defend yourself. You don't have a right to occupy people, deny them their human rights, and then cry foul when they resist. That's not the right to self defense. That's the right to repression. That's what Israel is asking for here. Let us do away with these dissenters, these Palestinian dissenters, and call it defense. Speaker 0: As news media have proliferated over the years, Israel's public relations efforts have only become more and more explicit and intense. Speaker 29: In The United States, we have a show called The Apprentice where Donald Trump auditions people to work in his corporate boardroom. In Israel, the version of the apprentice is called, the ambassador. Speaker 30: The ambassador. In a world where the real battles take place in newsrooms and TV studios, the ability to create a positive image for your country is a crucial task for every ambassador. Speaker 29: It's a show where Israelis compete for who can offer the best Hosbura. That means explain in Hebrew. Explain our situation. Speaker 31: While The Apprentice tests contestants' ability to sell lemonade on the street Lemonade. Or handle office politics, the ambassador finalists have learned that selling real politics is a lot harder. Speaker 2: The problem is that when you sell lemonade, nobody hates lemonade. Nobody's gonna say that your lemonade occupies territories or that your lemonade kills babies. Speaker 29: Israel's mechanism of projecting its propaganda or what they call Hasbara is one of the most sophisticated arms of its government. It's a weapon of Israeli warfare. Speaker 7: And when you look today at how the media cover the conflict, you see just how successful Israel's propaganda has been in reversing the legacy of Lebanon. Speaker 9: If there's any complaints, and there should be, about civilian deaths that they they belong, the responsibility and the blame belongs in one place, Hamas. I don't think anyone should get that wrong. Speaker 6: The Israeli position is the first position they are allowed to to determine the narrative, determine the facts on the ground. Speaker 2: Hamas is a terror organization committed to our destruction. They fire thousands of rockets at our cities. Speaker 6: It becomes a story of Israelis responding to Palestinian attacks. Speaker 2: Israel says this is a response to the almost 800 rockets that had landed in Israel from Gaza this year alone. Speaker 7: Again and again, the wider context of Israel's occupation simply drops out of the coverage. So it comes across as this confusing and endless cycle of violence that begins when Palestinians attack and Israelis retaliate in self defense. Speaker 32: Three Palestinians were shot and killed while allegedly trying to attack Israelis with kitchen knives. Speaker 5: This cycle of violence continues. When Hamas launches rockets from Gaza, Israel hits back. Speaker 3: Cycle of violence presupposes this back and forth retaliation. It's the same sort of thing with a lull in the violence or a relative calm. Speaker 12: After three days of relative calm, the violence is once again picking up here in The Middle East. Speaker 3: Well, relative to who and to what. Right, what's actually going on on the ground is not ever a lull in the violence for Palestinians. In fact, occupation is a system of violence that goes on every single day. Just because there's no violence that Israelis are witnessing for a particular period of time before it resumes again does not mean that there's no violence facing Palestinians from the occupation. So this lull in the violence is only seen through the prism of Israeli victimhood, not Palestinian victimhood. Speaker 6: It's no wonder that Americans would identify with the Israeli side or or support it. It would be shocking if they didn't. And I think this is the the lesson to be drawn from thirty years of media coverage that I think has been slanted heavily in favor of Israeli interests. Speaker 7: What we've seen is really another kind of occupation, an occupation of American media and what we could call the American mind by a pro Israel narrative that's deflected attention away from what virtually everyone recognizes as the best way to resolve this conflict, end the occupation and the settlements so that Palestinians can finally have a state of their own. Speaker 33: Ladies and gentlemen, mister Arafat, chairman of the executive council of the Palestine Liberation Organization, his excellency, Yitzhak Rabin, prime minister of Israel, the president of The United States. Speaker 0: The ongoing peace process that began with the Oslo peace accords in 1993 was designed to negotiate the terms of Israel's withdrawal from Palestinian territory in accordance with the UN resolution two four two, which made an explicit connection between Israeli withdrawal and a just and lasting peace. Speaker 34: For decades, there has been an overwhelming international consensus on a political settlement of the conflict, namely a settlement on the internationally recognized border. Speaker 7: The international consensus for a two state solution is based on the borders in place before the sixty seven war. This means that Israel gets 78% and the Palestinians get the rest, 22 of historic Palestine. Twenty Two Percent. That's it. Speaker 0: But since Oslo, Israel has actually taken more Palestinian land for its Jewish only settlements. In 1993, there were approximately 200,000 illegal Jewish settlers living in the occupied Palestinian territories. Since then, that number has more than tripled with approximately 650,000 settlers now living in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. In addition, since 1967, Israel has also demolished approximately 28,000 Palestinian homes. Speaker 2: The United Nations says there's been a big increase in the number of Palestinian homes demolished by Israeli forces. This Speaker 0: is what Palestinians have called ethnic cleansing, demolitions and evictions carried out by Israel in the occupied West Bank. So Speaker 15: if you look Speaker 35: at the result, not the words and the pretty phrases, what's happened over the past twenty years and was inaugurated at Oslo was not a peace process. It was an annexation process. Speaker 19: What has happened is that now one in 11 Israeli Jews live in these illegal settlements. So the failure to confront the settlement enterprise from the very beginning, I think has created a almost insuperable obstacle to the creation of a Palestinian state. There's no place to put it. Speaker 20: And that's what the settlements are all about. It's to claim the land, facts on the ground that become nothing we can do about it now, it's too late. Israel wants as much of the land as they can get away with, with as few Palestinians on it as possible. Speaker 36: Israeli governments from the very beginning after the sixty seven war never considered giving up Israeli control of the territories. Moshe Dayan, who served as defense minister and foreign minister, people asked him what will be the future. Now we're controlling the territories. And he said, the future will be exactly what it is today. We must continue to retain the control of these territories. Speaker 7: Just listen to Netanyahu talking in private to his right wing settler base in 02/2001 about how he has no intention despite what Israel agreed to at Oslo of giving up land and ending its illegal settlement expansion in the West Bank and the rest of the Jordan Valley. Netanyahu is clear that Israel's not giving anything up. But he's also very clear that the way to make that argument is to invoke security threats, and he's especially confident that he can manipulate the American people to buy into this argument. Speaker 9: And Speaker 7: this, of course, is exactly the case is made to the American people time and time again whenever Israel's been called out for refusing to end the occupation and its settlement project. Speaker 9: We're willing to make great concessions for peace, but there is something that I will never compromise on, and that's Israel's security. Speaker 24: The conventional wisdom is that continuing the occupation makes Israel more secure. And if you buy that argument, then it's a license to occupy indefinitely. Speaker 3: What we're we're talking about here is something that is completely indefensible. Israel knows this. Israel knows this very well, and for that reason, wants to talk about anything and everything else. They'd rather talk about terrorism. They'd rather talk about security. They'd rather talk about Iran. Anything but the occupation. Speaker 7: The reason they've been able to so effectively change the subject isn't because they're practicing some kind of mass mind control. The main reason is that the US government itself has had a vested interest in promoting the same narrative for almost fifty years now. This goes back to the start of the so called special relationship with Israel in the late nineteen sixties when The US decides to deputize Israel and make it what the Nixon administration called a cop on the beat to protect American interest in the Middle East, especially US energy supplies. Ever since, the American government has continued to give Israel roughly $3,000,000,000 a year in military aid while also vetoing one UN resolution after another, condemning the occupation and settlements. The challenge is to make sure that the American people stay on board with despite what Israel is doing. Speaker 0: A number of well funded public relations organizations have emerged within The United States to help Israel justify its policies, especially the occupation and settlements, on security grounds. One of these groups is the Israel project. In 02/2009, the Israel project turned to conservative pollster and rebranding expert Frank Luntz. Speaker 2: Frank Luntz. This is the man that reframed the estate tax as the death tax, Health care reform as government takeover of health care. Now some critics have called Luntz a spin doctor who manipulates public emotion, but Luntz would reframe that as Fox News analyst. Speaker 0: The Israel project hired him to determine which talking points used by Israeli and US Officials over time have been most effective in maintaining American sympathy for Israel. Luntz wrote up his recommendations in a 02/2009 report called the Global Language Dictionary. Speaker 7: If you wanna understand how the propaganda works, especially in The US, you need to read the Luntz document. He's really clear that the occupation and especially the settlements are a problem. And he points the polls that show a large majority of Americans actually think that Israel should retreat to the 67 borders. In fact, he says, when you talk about land in terms of 67, you completely flip American sentiment against you. But, and this is his solution, if you bring up the danger of terrorism, you win back to support. The key, Lunt says, is to claim that the fight is over ideology, not land, about terror, not territory. In fact, these three words, terror, not territory, summarize the basis of the propaganda campaign in The US. And Lance goes on to say that one of the most effective ways to make the conflict about terrorism is to refer to an obscure political document written in 1988 by a small group of idolugs, the Hamas Charter, that calls for the destruction of Israel. Even though the Hamas leadership effectively disowned the charter a long time ago, it's been PR gold for Israel. Lunt's research has discovered that when Americans hear the words of the charter, Israel goes from bully to victim, and sympathy for the plight of the Palestinians dissipates. So he says, don't just quote it. Read it out loud again and again. And his advice has been taken up often hysterically by Israel's advocates. Speaker 37: The Hamash charter not only calls for Israel's destructions, ladies and gentlemen. Article seven calls for the murder of every Jew. It calls for the murder of every Jew. It's a Nazi document. Speaker 3: We have the Israeli prime minister saying movements like Hamas that are national movements are the same thing as ISIS. Speaker 9: Hamas is like ISIS. Hamas is like Al Qaeda. Hamas is like Hezbollah. Hamas is like Boko Haram. Speaker 3: And they are completely not the same thing. And anyone who understands anything about The Middle East and political dynamics there will will explain to you exactly why that is the case and and immediately spot that for the propaganda that it is. Speaker 36: Hamas is as much a nationalist movement as it is in a religious movement. And in fact, it it often assigns priority to its nationalist goals over its religious goals. This false notion that Hamas is part of this Al Qaeda network is not bought even by important elements of the American military. Speaker 0: In 02/2010, the United States Central Command or CENTCOM, the highest military command in The US, issued a classified report that questioned The current US policy of isolating and marginalizing Hamas as well as Hezbollah in Lebanon. The report described the two groups as pragmatic and argued that putting them and Al Qaeda in the same sentence as if they're all the same is just stupid, and it directly repudiated Israel's publicly stated view that Hamas and Hezbollah are incapable of change and must be confronted with force, warning that failing to recognize their grievances and objectives would result in continued failure in moderating their behavior. Speaker 7: And the US military isn't alone in this assessment. ISIS itself has attacked Hamas again and again because they're not radical enough. They're too pragmatic and too compromising. But none of these facts stop people from going on and on about Hamas' charter anyway in order to paint Hamas with the same brush as ISIS. Speaker 37: I spent a lot of time on my radio program going over Hamas' charter. What it says, it wants to obliterate Israel. It wants to destroy the Jews. It is a sick, twisted, you know, perverted ideology, a religion that has been hijacked by radicals, and it it manifests itself in different forms, Muslim brotherhood, Islamic Jihad, Hamas Hezbollah, ISIS Al Qaeda, you know, it's all the same thing. Speaker 7: Meanwhile, you hear next to nothing about another extreme political charter that has much more relevance to the conflict, the platform of the ruling Likud party in Israel. Speaker 3: Well, if you look at the language that's in that charter, the Likud charter, it flatly rejects, quote, flatly rejects the existence of a Palestinian state anywhere anywhere on that side of the Jordan River. In other words, completely denying the right of a state of Palestine to exist. That's far more relevant to have language like the language in the Likud charter be in the charter of a party that is the largest in an Israeli government, driving an Israeli state, and has the capacity to act upon the words in their charter in a way that no other party does. Speaker 0: To strengthen the case that the conflict is about terrorism and not territory, Luntz points to the effectiveness of another well established Israeli talking point, the claim that Israel gave up control of Gaza in 02/2005 in hopes of achieving peace and a two state solution and got only rockets in return. Speaker 10: We left Gaza completely. We had Gaza. They could have turned it into a flourishing, wonderful place to live in. Look at what they did. They turned it into a haven of terrorists coming from all over the world. Speaker 3: It's completely untrue that Israel left the the Gaza Strip. They did withdraw their colonists, but at the same time, they tightened their control over the Gaza Strip. Speaker 2: This is Gaza's main freight route into Israel, and normally this road would be bumper to bumper with heavily laden trucks, but it's completely closed as is every other border crossing in the country. Nothing's coming into Gaza and nothing is getting out. Speaker 3: So the idea that Israel left is 100% bogus. Speaker 20: Gaza remains occupied. Gaza has no control over its coast, over its waters, over its harbor, over its airspace, over the land or its borders, over its people. Who can come and go is totally at the Israeli discretion. In Gaza, there are constant military attacks by the Israeli Air Force by drones. Targeted assassinations go on all the time. It wasn't really a withdrawal, Speaker 6: but the conventional shorthand in the media is that Israel was willing to give up an enormous amount to the Palestinian side, and the Palestinians responded with violence. Israel, Speaker 38: for since 1967, controlled Gaza. They gave it to the Palestinians in a gesture of peace, and all they got are a bunch of rockets and retriever. Speaker 7: This is the basic frame of Israel's PR campaign. Make sure the media stays focused on terrorism and amass extremism as a source of the conflict, not the occupation and the settlements. If you wanna see this in operation, just look at the coverage of any of Israel's many attacks on Gaza over the past few Speaker 2: evening. In the sixty years of conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, there have been few, if any, days like this one. The scale and intensity of this attack was surprising. The deadliest operation against Palestinians in decades. Speaker 3: After an intense three week assault, thirteen hundred dead, five thousand wounded. Speaker 0: In February, Israel launched Operation Karzleid, a massive ground and air assault on the Gaza Strip. Speaker 27: The air force released this cockpit video. Speaker 0: Over a period of three weeks, the Israeli military dropped over 600 tons of bombs on Gaza. Speaker 27: It isn't clear yet how many civilians are among Speaker 0: Nearly fourteen hundred Palestinians were killed and thousands more injured. Speaker 27: The wounded were carried on corrugated iron, in private cars, on bats, and in arms. The worst one day casualty toll in Gaza anybody can remember. Speaker 18: Normally in a conflict, civilians can run for their lives. Gaza was one of the few, if not the only modern conflict where the helpless civilians who were subjected to massive technologically advanced firepower by the Israelis had no escape route. Speaker 39: With Gaza City bombed and burning, Palestinians heeded Israel's warning to get out of the way, but found they had nowhere to go. What's a safe place for us to go, the woman cried? Not the UN compound where 700 people took shelter. Israeli artillery hit it then hit it again. Speaker 34: It was a brutal murderous attack, devastating. This attack was murderous. Speaker 0: As with the Lebanon invasion three decades before, horrific images of destruction spilled onto television screens around the world. But this time, the Israeli government was prepared. Six months earlier, it had set up a new unit within the Israeli prime minister's office to help coordinate the government's messaging once the invasion started. Speaker 32: Israel is defending its actions, saying this assault is in direct response to almost daily rocket and mortar attacks. Speaker 40: If you ask any American why that war started, they would say because the Palestinians started, you know, firing rockets at Israel. Speaker 2: Hamas keeping up the rocket fire that triggered the Israeli attacks in the first place. Speaker 41: Hamas once again firing several dozen rockets into Israel today. Speaker 40: They're always preparing Americans for an attack against these people who are incorrigible terrorists, who are constantly shooting rockets, and never ever giving the other side of the story. Speaker 6: We were told endlessly in any media outlet you wanna look at that Israel had to invade and attack the Gaza Strip because of an unending assault from Hamas and various militant groups in Gaza. Speaker 2: What are the goals of that operation right now? Speaker 36: To change totally the behavior of the Hamas. It's a terrorist regime that keeps shelling Israel with thousands of rockets and motor shells. Speaker 6: What this forgets is that for the latter half of 2,008, there was a very successful ceasefire that curtailed rocket fire into Israel dramatically, almost to the point at which there was none. This was shattered in February when Israel attacked what they said was a tunnel building project, killed six Hamas militants. At that point, the ceasefire was off. Now the New York Times, the so called paper of record, reported this very clearly one time. Speaker 7: The story gets buried on page eight of the New York Times and hardly registers anywhere else. Why? Well, look at the day that Israel chose to break the ceasefire, 11/04/2008, which just coincidentally happened to be the day of the historic election of Barack Obama. It virtually guaranteed that no one in America would notice, and that's exactly how it played out. When Hamas resumed rocket attacks after Israel broke the ceasefire, Israeli officials went on American television and got away with blaming Hamas for breaking the ceasefire. Speaker 42: You know, it was Hamas that unilaterally tore up the ceasefire understandings. It was Hamas that escalated the vines that reached a crescendo on Christmas day when we had in one twenty four hour period some 80 rockets, mortar shells, and missiles coming into Israel attacking our civilians. Now we want to work with the Palestinian government. Speaker 7: And the lie was then repeated uncritically by US news media. Speaker 40: James, there's no question here, is there, that Hamas started this? Speaker 43: Well, look, I don't think Israel had any choice. It was a ceasefire that was broken by Hamas. They fired something like 300 rockets into Israel. I mean, this is an act of war. What are they supposed to do? Speaker 7: Just compare this to how media outside The US dealt with this. Speaker 4: Isn't it the fact that during the ceasefire, not a single Israeli was killed? And the reason for that was because Hamas fired not a single rocket. Speaker 44: No. I think you're wrong, unfortunately, because during that ceasefire of six months, they were firing rockets on a daily basis. Speaker 7: On channel four in Britain, you saw an anchor presenting evidence that the Israeli government itself acknowledged that Hamas observed the ceasefire. Speaker 4: This is actually a document that's given to journalists by the Israeli government. And in this document, it says, and I'm quoting, Hamas was careful to maintain the ceasefire. Speaker 7: The Israeli official clearly caught in a lie, attempts to change the subject to how evil Hamas is. But the interviewer doesn't let him get away with it. Speaker 44: They were firing rockets, and they're always trying to target civilians. Their main goal is to try to kill children and women. Speaker 4: And not that Shasham, I'm I'm I'm I'm gonna have to stop you because this document is published by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Israel Intelligence Heritage and Commemoration Center, and they say Speaker 27: It is not a Speaker 4: that Hamas maintained the ceasefire. Speaker 44: It's not a government. It is private institution. Speaker 4: To foreign journalists by the government as a statement Speaker 44: of fact. Listen. Speaker 4: Now Speaker 44: the facts to hear the facts or you'd like to invent some facts? Speaker 32: I would Speaker 4: like you to tell me Speaker 3: the facts because these are actually Speaker 7: Exchanges like these are unthinkable in The US, even though Israel itself behind the scenes acknowledged Hamas had observed the ceasefire, something another British reporter forced Israeli spokesperson Mark Regev to admit on camera. Speaker 19: There were no Hamas rockets during the ceasefire. Before November, there were no Hamas rockets for four months. Speaker 42: And that's correct. Speaker 34: Israel officially recognizes that until it broke the ceasefire, Hamas didn't fire a single rocket. I mean, the propaganda is so powerful that these truisms, literally truisms, are almost inexpressible. Speaker 6: The lesson is that this conflict started when we say it started, and we say it started when Israel was attacked. Speaker 0: In 02/2012 and again in 02/2014, Israel launched two more devastating attacks on Gaza. Speaker 7: Israel can saturate the media with its spokespeople, but there's still the problem of massive Palestinian casualties showing up on television screens. You can't make those images go away. An Israeli official actually said, in the war of pictures, we lose. So you need to correct, explain, or balance it in other ways. Here again, the Luntz document spells out which talking points have been most effective in spinning the brutal reality of Palestinian casualties. He says the first thing the pro Israeli spokespeople should do is to express empathy for the innocent victims. Speaker 36: Unfortunately, innocents do get hurt, and we we really grieve that. We're sad for every civilian casualty. Speaker 14: The entire situation is tragic. Speaker 7: Once you've done that, Lance says, you also have to get people to empathize with Israelis by describing what life is like for them, living in constant fear of Hamas rocket attacks. So again and again, we hear the focused tested phrase that the rockets are raining down on Israel. Speaker 14: We have thousands of rockets raining down on our civilians. Rockets were raining down on Israel. Speaker 24: Any advertising executive will tell you the essence of propaganda is repetition. Speaker 32: Rockets raining down on Southern Israel. Rockets raining down on Israel. The Hamas rockets rained down on Israeli border towns. Speaker 7: Then, Lance tells PR spokespeople to turn the tables and ask the American people, what would you do? Speaker 9: So what would you do in The United States? Speaker 2: You imagine what America would do if it were facing a similar threat? Speaker 36: We always try to ask you the question we ask ourselves. What will you do? What would you do? What would you do Speaker 42: if more than 3,000 rockets had been fired on your cities? Speaker 37: What would you do, 3,000 rockets? Speaker 42: What would you do if terrorists were tunneling under your frontier? Speaker 37: What would you do if three kids are kidnapped because of a tunnel network? Speaker 3: What sort of question is this? Of course, anybody would act to defend themselves against unprovoked aggression, but it is a question that is completely devoid of any context. What drives society to a point where after multiple devastating wars, they continue to resist with these most feeble methods? They don't want you to ask that question. They don't want you to ask what is behind this? What's the history here? Who are these people? Where did they come from? Why are they so desperate? No. They want you to understand Israeli behavior. Israeli behavior is always characterized as a reaction to unprovoked violence. Speaker 7: Then on top of that, when massive numbers of Palestinian civilians predictably die from Israeli attacks, Israel claims it's part of a deliberate Hamas strategy to drum up sympathy. They use Speaker 9: telegenically dead Palestinians for their cause. They want the more dead, the better. Speaker 7: So they end up in this upside down Orwellian world where Israelis killing civilians becomes an unforgivable transgression against Israelis. Speaker 5: It is hard to come away with any feeling but that we are in the midst of a world gone mad. Last week, I found a quote of many years ago by Golda Meir, one of Israel's early leaders, which might have been said yesterday. We can forgive the Arabs for killing our children, she said, but we can never forgive them for forcing us to kill their children. Speaker 6: It's not difficult to imagine Americans identifying with Palestinians who are suffering, but they need to be able to see that suffering on their television screens and in their newspapers. Speaker 4: Israel said today its new offensive is targeting terrorists. Speaker 6: And when your sense of the coverage is that there's something that these people did to deserve this or that they are affiliated with terrorists and terrorist minded governments, The fallout of that is an inability to identify with people who are suffering in far greater numbers and in far greater proportion than their Israeli counterparts. Speaker 0: The effort to shape American perceptions of the Israeli Palestinian conflict has been taken up by a number of pro Israel groups based in The US. Together, these groups are commonly referred to as the Israel lobby. Nowhere has the lobby's power to shape a pro Israel narrative been more visible than in the US Congress due largely to the efforts of one of the most influential lobbying groups working on Capitol Hill today, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, better known as APEC. Speaker 45: It Speaker 11: is great to see so many good friends from all across the country. Speaker 46: I see more than 10,000 people, young and old. Speaker 0: APAC's annual conference draws nearly 10,000 attendees from around the country, including the most influential members of both houses of congress from both parties. Speaker 2: Remember there are seven congressional office buildings? Speaker 47: As you leave here today to meet with your senators and representatives, I want you to go there knowing with certainty that you'll make a difference with every member that you meet. Speaker 2: You're gonna feel so good when six months from now, you see the three major talking points evolve to three points of legislation for the US government. Speaker 48: Is passed. Speaker 19: It would be very hard for ordinary Americans to know that they're being deceived, that that some very competent experts at spin management are in fact deluding them. There are many reasons for this. One of them is that the American political class has basically swallowed the line hook line and sinker. Speaker 49: They keep getting rocket attack after rocket attack, and then they're criticized for human rights problems because they defend themselves. Speaker 19: This is particularly true for Republicans. Speaker 50: They're responding, mister speaker, to attacks on their civilian population. I mean, what is it that they want? Well, we know what they want. They want Israel obliterated from the map, mister speaker. Speaker 19: But it's also true for many Democrats. Speaker 11: We stand with our ally. We stand with the democratic state of Israel. We stand against terrorism. Speaker 2: This administration will always stand up for Israel's right to defend itself. Speaker 19: They made the mistake of actually leaving APEC's fax address on one bill that was actually laid before congress. And, of course, nobody was apparently embarrassed. The fact that APEC writes the legislation for them or writes their speeches for them doesn't seem to, in the least, bother people. Speaker 41: There's nothing happening here that's secret or under the table. It's not a cabal. It's not a conspiracy. It is, in fact, domestic politics the way it's practiced here in The United States. There are roughly three dozen or so pro Israel pacts that give money. Over the last fifteen or twenty years, they've given $5,560,000,000 dollars in American elections. There are one or two Arab American PACs, and I believe last time I looked, they'd given, you know, 800,000 to a million. So you've got $55,000,000 of PAC contributions on one side, and you've got maybe a million at most on the other side. That gives you a pretty good sense of what the balance of power is if you're planning on running for congress. Speaker 40: It's all about the money. Speaker 9: And I do see a lot of old friends here, and I see a lot of new friends of Israel here as well. Democrats and Republicans alike. Speaker 40: He being Netanyahu got a joint session so that Democrats and Republicans would have the opportunity to stand up and cheer for him, and it would be good for their campaigns to raise money. He put out the most hard line propaganda that went entirely against US policy. Speaker 9: The border will be different than the one that existed on 06/04/1967. Israel will not return to the indefensible boundaries of 1967. Speaker 40: And he gets 29 or 39 standing ovations. What are they applauding? The continuation of the conflict? Are they applauding that more Israelis and Palestinians are gonna keep dying? Is that what they're applauding? No. They're applauding we want more money in the next campaign. That's what it's entirely about. There is no other issue like this. Speaker 7: For the most part, the lobby pushes policies that are consistent with US interests anyway. And when these interests don't align, we see the limits of the lobby's power as we saw with Obama's Iran policy, which passed despite an intense campaign by the lobby to defeat it. So we shouldn't overstate the influence of the lobby on American foreign policy. But at the same time, we shouldn't underestimate the lobby's power to limit debate about Israeli policies in the occupied territories, especially far right Israeli policies that are often way out of step with the political views of most American Jews. In fact, it's not accurate to call it a Jewish lobby at all. It's the Israel lobby. Speaker 19: The actual views of most people in the American Jewish community according to every poll diverge greatly from the extreme right wing, neoconservative views of the entire establishment leadership of that community. Most people in the Jewish community are much more liberal. They're against settlement. They're against occupation. They want a two state solution. The lobby and its the various other institutions are the main supports and props of settlement and occupation and of protection of the status quo. Speaker 41: And there are some key elements of what we call the Israel lobby that aren't Jewish, so called Christian Zionists. Speaker 32: Evangelical Christians in America have become Israel's staunchest ally in an increasingly hostile world. Speaker 7: Powerful groups like CUFI, Christians United for Israel, lobby Congress for an expansion of Israeli territory because they believe that's what the Bible calls for. Speaker 22: CUFI representatives from all 50 states went to Capitol Hill. Their purpose was to personally speak with their elected officials and express concerns for Israel's security and their support of Israel's right to the land by biblical mandate. Speaker 34: In The United States, roughly a third of the population believes that every word of the Bible is literally true. If the Bible is literally true, then the land of Israel was promised to the Jews by God, and they have every right to take it over from the usurpers. Speaker 15: Listen closely, those of you who are listening in the liberal media. The Jewish people are not occupying the land of Israel. They own the land of Israel. The truth about Israel is God gave the land of Israel to Abraham in an eternal blood covenant four thousand years ago. The land of Israel belonged to the Jewish people then. It belongs to the Jewish people today, and it will belong to the Jewish people forever. The land is their land. Speaker 41: One of the problems with the influence the Israel lobby has in The United States now is it has been hard for government officials to have an honest discussion. Speaker 7: Just look what happened to president Obama when he made the mistake of simply saying out loud what the international consensus is. Speaker 11: We believe the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. Speaker 7: It didn't matter that Obama was just repeating what had been official US policy for decades Or the right wing president Ronald Reagan had said essentially the same thing in the nineteen eighties in even stronger language. Speaker 5: UN resolution two four two remains wholly valid as the foundation stone of America's Middle East peace effort. It is The United States position that in return for peace, the withdrawal provision of resolution two four two applies to all fronts, including the West Bank and Gaza. Further settlement activity is in no way necessary for the security of Israel and only diminishes the confidence of the Arabs that a final outcome can be freely and fairly negotiated. Speaker 7: When Obama said it, he was immediately accused by right wing groups of setting up Israel for another holocaust. Speaker 51: Has president Obama abandoned Israel? After strong support by 11 consecutive American presidents, it appears Obama has moved sharply toward Israel's enemies, and the results could be disastrous. The leader of Hezbollah has vowed to finish the job Hitler started. Up till now, America's strong backing of Israel made that impossible. But with Obama's waffling, could a second holocaust be on the way? Speaker 15: No. Auschwitz. Speaker 7: It's a pretty ingenious tactic. How are supposed to have a rational discussion about the occupation when pro Israel Extremists call the 67 borders the Auschwitz borders? No. Auschwitz border. Speaker 40: These are the two alternatives. You're either gonna be in Auschwitz or you support Israel. Because Israel was in fact created in the wake of the Holocaust, it isn't that extraordinary that the two would be linked that way. I have a problem with the idea of exploiting the link and using those 6,000,000 Jews in almost in my mind, it's like saying Anne Frank would would want the occupation to continue. Speaker 14: You know, the Jews have gone through, an unspeakable historical trauma. Right? But the fact is that if you look at other sort of reactionary or right wing propagandas, various kinds, you know, nationalistic and so on, you see that what they all kinda have in common is this view that we are in danger. We are victims. They're trying to destroy us. Speaker 9: If history has taught the Jewish people anything, it is that we must take calls for our destruction seriously. We are a nation that rose from the ashes of the holocaust. When we say never again, we mean never again. Speaker 14: You're the victim, so anything you do in self defense is okay, even though it has you acting like a monster. Right? Speaker 19: A suggestion that Israel has committed war crimes is particularly offensive given that the Jewish people suffered under the most horrific war crimes in the Holocaust. Speaker 35: It's the argument they always use. Remember the Holocaust. It's always invoking the Holocaust in order to justify Israel being held to a different standard than everyone else is being held to. Speaker 8: I see a lot of manipulation here about the victimhood of Israeli Jews, the sense of victimhood. And I'm a child of survivors, Holocaust survivors, so I'll be the last one to underestimate the importance of history and the history of persecution of Jews in the Israeli Palestinian context. But does it mean that Jews now in Israel go every day and think about Auschwitz? I doubt it. Speaker 41: Anyone who is critical of the special relationship, criticizes the activities of the lobby, or disagrees with the policies that they recommend, or is critical of Israel's conduct, is virtually certain to be attacked, usually in very harsh ways, by Israel's defenders. There are watchdog groups that keep track of what different media organizations publish or broadcast, and if they're not happy about it, they either publish their own attacks, they organize consumer boycotts. Speaker 40: Israelis and the lobby do not think there's ever any problem with policy. The problem is only the way it's covered, which is why they have organizations like CAMR, which is, you know, the Committee on Middle East Accuracy. Accuracy means that you present the side that makes Israel look good. The lobby and the Israelis believe that the mainstream media in America is pro Palestinian. I mean, it's laughable. Speaker 2: Consistently, the Times has suppressed any story that would portray Israel sympathetically, and on the other hand, has written dozens of stories portraying the Palestinians sympathetically. Speaker 38: Israel is now portrayed in much of the major media, especially CNN, the BBC, as the aggressor, as the predator nation, and the poor Palestinians and Arabs as the victims. Speaker 6: It's one of the most profoundly successful tactics of right wing media pressure and media criticism groups, and they were going to argue that it's true in violation of all the facts. Speaker 32: You're saying that because CNN has interviewed Palestinian families and shown Palestinian children who have been wounded or killed, that somehow CNN is saying that Hamas is okay? I don't think that those two are equivalent. We're not allowed to show the civilians caught in the crossfire? Speaker 52: Of course, you're allowed to show civilians caught in the crossfire. You should also mention all the restrictions that Hamas puts on your reporting inside the Gaza Strip. You should also mention all the context with regard Hamas putting children in harm's way. You should also routinely mention the fact that Hamas' charter calls for destruction not only to the state of Israel, but for the murder of Jews across the world, which, of course, CNN does not. Speaker 32: That that's silly, Ben. We talk about that all the time. We talk about the charter the Hamas charter that says that they want to obliterate Israel and wipe Israel off the face of the map. That's you're just not being fair. That's not true. Speaker 15: Our Speaker 52: reporters on ground occasionally. In the you mentioned it occasionally in the midst of vast swaths of imagery about Israel using what you would term excessive force. Speaker 6: The media outlets don't see the pushback from the other side. They don't see the upside to standing up for for their own reporting. So I think in most cases, they cave. Speaker 7: Look at the pressure that came down on veteran NBC reporter Ayman Moyaldin when he was covering the two thousand and fourteen Gaza invasion for NBC. Moyaldin was playing soccer on a beach with four Palestinian kids just moments before they were killed by an Israeli rocket. And he talked about this on social media and shared video of the heartbroken reactions of the kid's parents. And what did NBC do? It responded by pulling Mayold in from Gaza. And, of course, there's no greater weapon in the attack arsenal than equating critical coverage of Israel's policies with antisemitism. Speaker 21: Any fair minded person who follows Al Jazeera knows it's anti American and antisemitic. You're a Jew Exploding. Jewish man. Correct? Speaker 27: Yes. Speaker 21: I am. It doesn't it doesn't come more antisemitic now, Al Jazeera. I am They would they would they would do violence to you. Speaker 18: Who and who? Speaker 21: A journalist at Al Jazeera? People that run that network. They would do violence you. I hardly think so. Speaker 34: Abba Eban wrote an article in which he explained to American Jews what their task was. Their task is to show that anyone who's a critic of Zionism, by which he means a critic of the policies of the state of Israel, must be either an anti Semite or a neurotic self hating Jew that covers a % of possible criticism. Speaker 37: We'll start tonight in in The Middle East where Israel What? Israel isn't supposed to defend itself? Speaker 48: Mexico bomb taxes will be exercised What are Speaker 15: the countries Speaker 2: around the same standard Speaker 3: as it is? Speaker 15: What are destroy her terrorism? 4,000 men away. Who's the only democracy in The Middle East? You're lying. Self hating Jew? Speaker 40: So used to be I was always called a self hating Jew, and and everybody like me was called a self hating Jew. I am now not only a self hating Jew, but they also call me an anti Semite. How I, with my four Jewish grandparents, I'm still an anti Semite. My wife was born in a displaced persons camp in Germany, and I'm an anti Semite. Speaker 3: They have for a very long time been able to effectively defend the indefensible, to the American public through miseducation and misinformation campaigns, through effective talking points, through, smearing individuals on the opposite, side of things, labeling them all kinds of things, sympathizers with terrorism. I've done dozens of interviews which begin from the terrorism departure point. But when given an opportunity to actually speak and present a different perspective, that can dissolve rather quickly. Speaker 37: Is Hamas a terrorist organization? Speaker 3: Do I get to actually speak now? Speaker 37: You get to answer the question. It's a simple yes or no question. Is Hamas Did you invite me on here? Is Hamas, whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel, is that a terrorist organization? That's a yes or no question. Thank Speaker 3: you for your question. It's very telling to me that and it should be telling to your viewers as well, by the way, that the moment you have a Palestinian voice on your program who begins to explain the legitimate grievances of Palestinians around Speaker 37: terrorist attacks. Answer. Let me Answer that question. What part of this can you get through your thick head? I think Is Hamas a terrorist organization? Me? Excuse me? Or no? The only thing Speaker 3: that you're gonna say is what we want you to say. And if you don't say it, we're not gonna let you speak. Speaker 7: So you end up with reporting that gives way more priority and weight to the official Israeli perspective than to the Palestinian one. Look at how American media covered Israel's Two Thousand And Fourteen Attack On Gaza. A keyword search of all the major networks showed that over the course of the 51 assault, Israel's ongoing military siege and blockade of Gaza were barely mentioned compared to the thousands of times Hamas rocket attacks on Israel were mentioned. Speaker 12: Why is Hamas launching missiles into population centers of Israel? Speaker 7: The basic propaganda frame is built into the very assumptions journalists bring to the table. Speaker 12: Since Israel pulled out of Gaza in 02/2005, '8 thousand rockets have been fired from Gaza into Israel. Speaker 7: This is how propaganda works. It works by getting your words in the mouths of other people, especially the mouths of supposedly objective media commentators. Speaker 46: I'm wondering though whether you're outraged by the conduct of Hamas, starting the conflict by firing rockers, building tunnels to kill and kidnap Israelis, being more than willing to sacrifice Palestinian lives by embedding them into into their own kind of arsenal and using them as Israel contends as human shields. Do you have a level of outrage at Hamas itself? Speaker 7: It doesn't seem like propaganda at all. It just seems like news. And this goes across all the major media, including the supposedly most liberal. Look at Rachel Maddow on MSNBC, who's known as the leading progressive voice on mainstream television. She did only four segments on the war. And during these few segments, she never once mentioned Israel's ongoing occupation of the West Bank or its siege and blockade of Gaza, and never once mentioned the fact that The US has armed Israel with the very weapons that were being used against the defenseless civilian population, Instead, choosing to frame the invasion as part of a senseless cycle of violence perpetrated by both sides. Speaker 48: It's been a constant cycle of fighting between Israel and Hamas for the past several years in Gaza. And the fighting and the cause of the fighting feel terribly familiar because this is basically a recurring war. And if it feels like deja vu, feels like, ugh, I've heard all of this before, you are right because this really does keep happening over and over and over again. Speaker 13: Rachel Manor, most important woman on MSNBC, the leader when it comes to politics, in six weeks of war, never mentioned the word blockade, occupation, illegal settlements, Never mentioned the support that Congress have for Israel, unconditional amount of money, billions of dollars. What is that? What a disappointment. Our media operations, national media is a scandal when it comes to Israel. I look at The UK with all its deficit, and there's real debate. For example, there's this anchor called Joan Snow, channel four in The UK, he interviewed Mark Regev, and he grilled him with questions, Grilled him. Speaker 53: Mark Regev, how does killing children on a beach contribute to that purpose? What was the point of bombing the El Wafa hospital, for goodness' sake? There are grave uncertainties No. No. About whether you are acting within Speaker 19: the law. Speaker 53: Oh, Oh, yes. You are deliberately targeting neighborhoods in which you know there are women and children. You've tried everything with Gaza. You've besieged it for seven years. The people live an intolerable and ghastly life, and you know that better than anybody. Why don't you try one other thing, talking? Why not talk? Why not be brave and talk directly with them? Why not? Speaker 13: I can never see this in America. I never seen anything like this in The United States. Speaker 7: There have been occasional examples of American journalists who've had the courage to challenge the official Israeli line. Back in the fifties, CBS's Mike Wallace didn't back down from grilling Israeli ambassador Abba Ibn about Israel's illegal takeover of Arab land. Speaker 22: The fact remains that Israel benefited territorially from a war, from armed violence. Well, as a member of the Judaic faith, which cherishes social justice and morality, do you believe that any country should profit territorially from violence? Speaker 7: And years later, Wallace didn't shy away from comparing the terrorist tactics of Palestinian militants with the terrorist tactics of Jewish militants in the nineteen forties. Speaker 22: The fact is that innocent people die from terror whoever the terrorist. The Jewish independence fighters, trying to hasten the exit of the British from Palestine and to intimidate the Arab population there, bombed bus stops and office buildings, railroad trains, and shopping crowds. The fighters of Stern and Irgun took a toll of innocent victims that ran into the hundreds. Speaker 7: More recently in 02/2012, during a sixty minutes piece, the late Bob Simon dared to report on what day to day life is like for Palestinian Christians who live under Israeli occupation. Speaker 54: Israel has occupied the West Bank for forty five years, turning the little town where Christ was born into what its residents call an open air prison. Christian Nastas lives with her mother Claire, her father, brother, and sister in this house which is surrounded on three sides by the wall. How do you live with this? Speaker 7: Simon's report was seen as so unusual and so incendiary that Israeli ambassador Michael Oren actually tried to spike it, censor it, leading Simon to directly confront him on camera. Speaker 55: When I heard that you were going to do a story about Christians in the holy Land and my and Speaker 14: had, I believe, information about the nature of it Speaker 55: and it's been confirmed by this interview today. Speaker 54: Nothing has been confirmed by the interview, mister ambassador, because you don't know what's going to be put on air. Speaker 55: Okay. I don't. True. Speaker 54: Mister ambassador, I've been doing this a long time, and I've received lots of reactions from just about everyone I've done stories about, but I've never gotten a reaction before from a story that hasn't been broadcast yet. Speaker 55: Well, it's a first time for everything, Bob. Speaker 7: These are examples of exceptional reporting, but they are the exception. And there's a reason for that. In each of these cases, these journalists were mercilessly attacked and labeled antisemitic. It didn't matter that they were both Jewish. That's how the climate of intimidation works. Speaker 19: It's almost impossible to get any view that isn't one way or another shaped by an Israeli perspective. Almost impossible. It cannot get in without facing a firestorm of pit bull attacks to make sure that the line is followed. Speaker 29: Everyone who's trying to tell the American public a different side of the story, an alternative view of the conflict that's reality based has already crossed a barrier of fear, and I think they've already told themselves, well, I'm gonna pay for this, but I'm ready to pay the price. Speaker 0: Over just the past few years, the proliferation of social media and Internet news sources has made it increasingly difficult for the Israeli government and pro Israel groups in The US to manage American perceptions of the conflict. Video footage and reporting from the ground bearing witness to the reality of the occupation are now more accessible than ever on the Internet. In addition, over the past few years, a number of high profile documentaries made by Israeli and Palestinian filmmakers alike have trained a harsh light on current Israeli policy and the repression of Palestinian At the same time, a powerful new boycott divestment and sanctions movement has been gaining momentum and raising awareness of the occupation. While activists from the Black Lives Matter movement have been making explicit connections between police violence against African Americans and the Israeli military's repression of Palestinians Speaker 56: We stand next to people who continue to courageously struggle and resist the occupation. People continue to dream and fight for freedom. From Ferguson to Palestine, the struggle for freedom continues. Speaker 0: And all of these developments seem to be having an effect. Polls now show that while sympathy for Israel remains at all time highs among older Americans, it has been hemorrhaging among young people. Speaker 7: Despite the efforts of the lobby, something really striking is taking place. Lots of young people are abandoning the mainstream media and turning instead other independent sources. So they have a totally different way of making sense of what's happening, an unfiltered view of Israel's repression. And pro Israel Operatives like Frank Lantz are in a panic. In his latest report, he calls what's happening with young people a disaster and demands that Israel supporters respond. And people have answered the call. You have powerful right wing billionaires like Sheldon Adelson, a major donor to Republican candidates, bankrolling a campaign to silence and intimidate student activists on college campuses. But it's not working. Groups like Students for Justice in Palestine, who see what's happening to Palestinians as a civil rights issue, have refused to be intimidated. They're refusing to back down even though they're being labeled as anti Semitic and terrorist sympathizers, and their numbers are growing. Hey. Hey. Ho ho. This seat of justice got to go. Speaker 3: As the discourse begins to open, more people are starting to understand this as a rights based issue, not an issue of radicalism. This is a movement for the rights of people whose rights are being denied, who are living under occupation, who want to live in their country freely just like anybody else. Speaker 19: You can see just so many video clips of kids having their hands smashed by soldiers with batons. You can see just so many pictures of thousands of people being killed as happened in Gaza. And at a certain point, you there's a cognitive dissonance. You realize that what you're being told Speaker 14: is a pack of lies. Let's just get away from the mythologies and talk about the realities, and then maybe be able to persuade people that they should not any longer give their unwavering support to a nation engaged in a policy that's not just inhumane and and brutal, but ultimately suicidal. Speaker 41: Given the central role that The United States plays in backing Israel, seems to me Americans, all Americans have a right to question particular Israeli policies and in particular the prolonged occupation. The fact that the Palestinian people have been kept without a state and without any political rights for decades now. Speaker 20: For us in The United States, I think, the issue has to be what is our government doing? How is our government allowing, enabling, supporting, arming, defending Israeli violations. Speaker 7: In the end, this comes down to a battle for the minds of the American people. A battle over the stories they're told to make sense of this conflict. A battle over perception. The more Americans are able to see the reality of occupation with their own eyes, to see images of routine daily violence, of the repression and humiliation that never make their way into mainstream news, the more they'll question the image of Israel as this tiny little David up against the bullying Arab Goliath and start to wonder if it's actually the outgun Palestinians who might be the real Davids here. When that starts becoming the dominant perception here in The US, all bets are off. It all comes down to American public perception. Speaker 34: That's the one way to change anything, changing perception and understanding here leading to a change of policy here. As long as The United States supports Israel, nothing's gonna happen. US government will support it as long as The US population tolerates. Speaker 45: In checkpoint. Better have your premise if you found at the checkpoint. Gumming on the tower aiming down at the checkpoint. I did it to keep you in fear at the checkpoint. Interfuse a cage in the rear of the checkpoint. Feels like prison on a tear at the checkpoint. I'd rather be anywhere but here at this checkpoint. Nelson Mandela wasn't blind to the checkpoint. He stood for free Palestine, not at checkpoint support. BDS don't give a dime to the checkpoint. This is international crime at the checkpoint. Arabs get treated like dogs at the checkpoint. Because discrimination is the law at the checkpoint. Criminalize without a cause at the checkpoint. I'm just telling you what I saw at the checkpoint. So I just got bad attitudes at the checkpoint. Condescending and real rules at the checkpoint. Don't let them in their ass when they move at the checkpoint. They might strip a man or woman nude at the checkpoint. Soldiers might blow you out the shoes at the checkpoint. Gas you up and in like the fuse at the checkpoint. Every day you stand to be accused at the checkpoint. Each time your life, you can lose at the checkpoint.

@TuckerCarlson — Tucker Carlson

Posted - October 14, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 1:29 AM

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

The 9/11 Files: From Cover-up to Conspiracy | Ep 4 https://t.co/pEYf7y8Rwe

Video Transcript AI Summary

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the episode’s core topics: Building 7, debris handling, official explanations, and claims of foreknowledge or foreign involvement. - Preserve key facts, dates, and figures exactly as presented: times (e.g., 10:28 a.m., 5:20 p.m.), building numbers (7, Towers 1 & 2), study names (NIST, FEMA, Hulsey), and specific claims (thermite traces, two-stage collapse, etc.). - Highlight unique or surprising assertions and the primary sources cited (FEMA, NIST, Open Chemical Physics Journal, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, NSA, Israeli involvement). - Exclude repetitive material, filler, and off-topic digressions; focus on evidentiary claims and counterpoints raised. - Do not offer judgments or evaluate claims; present statements as reported in the transcript. - Translate if needed (transcript is in English); keep the tone close to how claims are presented. - Limit length to 467-584 words; ensure a coherent, chronological flow. - Present all claims with precision and without added qualifiers or disclaimers. Summary: The episode contends that conspiracy theories flourish when the government suppresses evidence, ships rubble abroad, brands skeptics as crazy or criminal, and avoids genuine investigations or public trials. It asserts the same patterns followed after September 11: the perpetrator was captured and killed without widely circulated photos, his body dumped at sea, and the attack used to justify invading an unrelated country for a foreign power. The central claim is that there is a hidden or overlooked fact: the government played a central role in enabling the attacks, a point presented as established in an earlier episode about Bin Laden’s operatives and the failures enabling the attacks. The discussion then surveys nine/eleven theories with primary sources, interviews, and contemporary reporting. It notes that the North Tower collapsed at 10:28 a.m.; Building 7, a 47-story steel-frame high rise located about a football field away, also fell that day. It highlights that Building 7’s collapse is not addressed in the 9/11 Commission report, and points out that the building housed the New York City Office of Emergency Management, the U.S. Secret Service New York field office, a secret CIA office on the 20th floor, and a DoD office nearby, with records destroyed in the collapse. Observers questioned how a steel-building could collapse due to impacts and fires, and some argued for controlled demolition. The film cites two main analyses: FEMA’s and NIST’s explanations. FEMA blamed debris from the North Tower damaging Building 7’s facade and triggering fires; NIST attributed progressive collapse to thermal expansion causing a crucial girder to fail after water mains were damaged, with sprinklers out of service due to prior evacuations. Critics question symmetrical, global collapse rather than a single-point failure, and point to independent work by Leroy Hulsey (2020) suggesting office fires could not produce the necessary failure, and that NIST’s account does not align with video showing a total, not progressive, collapse. The documentary notes that an unedited video sequence appears to show a two-stage collapse (penthouse first, then the rest) and argues that the available footage is incomplete. Rubble was shipped overseas quickly, hindering a thorough analysis; a 2009 study in the Open Chemical Physics Journal identified red-gray chips with energetic and thermitic material in dust samples, implying explosive compounds. NIST considered blast scenarios but found patterns inconsistent with blasts; it did not test residual thermite. The film cites eyewitness accounts of explosions, a witness who died before the NIST report, and media inconsistencies (BBC reporting Building 7 down before it happened). It also notes an officially documented surge in put options against United Airlines and American Airlines just before 9/11, with significant volumes traced to a single investor; similar activity occurred with British Airways and other financial instruments, suggesting foreknowledge. Foreign intelligence involvement is emphasized, with particular focus on Israel. The episode asserts that the Israeli government had foreknowledge or beneficial perspective, pointing to celebratory sightings by five Israelis on 9/11, subsequent reporting about Israel’s potential prior warnings, and FBI notes about Israeli operatives detained in the U.S. for counterintelligence concerns. The NSA’s cooperation with allied intelligence services, sharing translated material while withholding raw data from the CIA, is described as contributing to gaps in U.S. knowledge. The episode repeatedly argues for a new, independent commission to answer questions about debris disposal, the CIA’s Building 7 role, NSA signals, and foreknowledge by foreign governments, while cataloging a broader impact—loss of constitutional protections and the war on terror’s consequences. The finale invites viewers to the next installment for disclosures about who benefited financially from 9/11, underscoring its broader political purpose and promoting membership for access to the full five-part series.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If you wanted conspiracy theories to flourish after the nine eleven attacks, here's what you'd do. You'd suppress video evidence of the attacks themselves. You'd ship the rubble from the attacks overseas immediately without looking at it. You'd call everyone who disputed the official narrative crazy or a criminal. You'd engage in a campaign of very obvious lies about the attacks. You'd do everything you could to prevent an actual investigation into what happened. You'd avoid any public trials. When you captured and killed the perpetrator, you'd show no photos or video evidence of the raid that killed him. Then you'd dump his body into the Noli Ocean. Then you'd use the attack to justify the invasion of a completely unrelated country on behalf of a foreign power. In other words, you do exactly what the US government did in the wake of nine eleven. It's possible that there are people who wanted conspiracy theories to thrive. Better. The more time people spend wondering about directed energy weapons, the less time they focus on the obvious, the facts hiding in plain sight. And the main fact that they are ignoring is our government's central role in facilitating those attacks. We established this in episode one of this series and the extreme levels of incompetence that made it possible for Bin Laden from Kandahar, Afghanistan to pull off the most sophisticated terror attacks in history. On the other hand, not all the wildest theories about nine eleven are crazy. Some of them raise legitimate questions about what happened. And in this episode, we'll go through those theories one by one and explain using primary source documents, interviews with CIA officials, contemporary news reports, exactly what we know about those theories. The North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed at 10:28 a. M. On the morning of nineeleven. And when it did, burning debris fell and damaged several of the buildings around it, including a building called World Trade Center Building Number 7. It was a 47 story steel frame high rise located about a football field's length away on the other side of Vesey Street. Interestingly, there was a building between the North Tower and Building 7. That building did not collapse. The collapse of Building 7 is completely unaddressed in the 09/11 commission report. 577 pages, but no explanation as to why Building 7 fell. And that provoked very obvious questions. People have been talking about it for the last twenty four years. Speaker 1: And if you watch some of these pieces, you can actually see them turning to dust before they hit the ground. Speaker 2: A steel building doesn't fall into its own footprint because the plane hit another building a couple 100 yards away. Speaker 1: I did not see a plane. I didn't they said the plane hit the first building. The second building just exploded. Speaker 0: The circumstances around Building Seven's collapse and the near total absence of an explanation for why it collapsed provoked, in the end, a senate investigation. Speaker 3: Start with Building 7. Again, I don't know if you can find structural engineers that would say that thing didn't come down in any other way than to control demolition. Speaker 0: Building seven had a pretty amazing list of tenants. They included, ironically, the New York City Office of Emergency Management. That would be the agency responsible for responding to the nine eleven attacks. On the Ninth And Tenth Floors of Building 7 were the New York field office of the United States Secret Service. The equipment and records they kept there were destroyed that day when the building collapsed. The building's 20 Fifth Floor was home to a secret CIA office. Its records were also destroyed. Across the 20 Fifth Floor was a Department of Defense office. It's unclear exactly what it was doing there. Building 7 was one of just three buildings that collapsed that day. The collapse of the other two, the Twin Towers, got extensive coverage in the nine eleven report, of course. But Building 7 was almost entirely ignored. It's worth remembering that even on the morning of the nine eleven attacks, there were very prominent people already doubting whether a plane could take down a steel frame building. Speaker 4: I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a seven sixty seven or seven forty seven or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this deal? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane, because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on a building. I mean, these buildings were rock solid. Speaker 0: One reason the nine eleven commission may have effectively ignored the collapse of Tower 7 is because even now we don't really know much about it. On the morning of September 11, Lower Manhattan was cut off from the public with military style checkpoints. World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed that afternoon at 05:20PM. Video that has been widely circulated appears to show it falling symmetrically into its own footprint. Several buildings closer to the Twin Towers meanwhile remain standing. That's odd. And then the debris was removed immediately and shipped to Asia. That's even stranger. Speaker 5: Where is all the rubble gone? And have you have you been able to there any way you can answer that question? Speaker 6: I'm sorry, Peter. I didn't get the question. Speaker 5: Okay. I apologize. Jackie Judd and several other people keep asking us, when you look at where the towers used to stand, there is surprisingly so little rubble. Where did all the rubble go? Speaker 6: It's a very good question, Peter, and I have asked some people who've been doing some of the rescue and recovery work this morning. If you look behind me, you can see the very remains, the skeletal remains of the World Trade Center. And one volunteer, Robert Garlinski, explained to me the reason there's so little rubble is that all of it simply fell down into the ground and was pulverized, evaporated. Now I should say though, for the last several hours, there's been a steady stream of dump trucks and other very large vehicles carrying out debris. Speaker 0: According to a New York Times article published five months after the attacks, quote, an unknown number of steel columns has been sent off to mills as far away as Asia without ever having been examined or saved. This made it nearly impossible for engineers to answer the monumental questions of exactly why and how the buildings, designed to sustain a jet impact, completely collapsed. To the extent that any analysis of the debris was done at all, it was done by volunteers at a scrap yard in Jersey City, New Jersey. According to the New York Times, the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation involves extremely thin bits of steel collected from the trade towers and from Seven World Trade Center, a 47 story high rise that also collapsed for unknown reasons. The steel apparently melted away, but no fire in any of the buildings was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright. Two agencies investigated the collapse. One was FEMA, which relied on volunteers, and the other was NIST, the National Institute for Standards and Technology, funded by Congress. FEMA's explanation is that falling debris from the North Tower damaged the outer facade of Building 7 and started a series of fires in the lower floors. According to NIST, the collapse of the towers in the morning had damaged water mains, so the building's sprinkler systems failed. Since the building had been evacuated earlier in the morning and the fire department's resources were stretched to a breaking point by ongoing search and rescue fire chiefs made the decision early on not to fight the fires that were burning in Building 7. According to the NIST report, thermal expansion of steel beams, not the complete melting of steel, caused connections tying a crucial girder, girder 2,001 to Column 79. And that joint failed. The girder walked six and a quarter inches off its seat and that precipitated what is known as progressive collapse. That means that the collapse started in one area and then spread downward due to gravity through the rest of the building. That's the explanation. There are two questions that come to mind and both are obvious. First, if there was just one failure point, then why does video evidence show the building coming down symmetrically all at once at free fall acceleration in what more closely resembles what's called a global collapse, where all the supporting columns are severed simultaneously? The second question is, how have other steel frame buildings around the world similar in design to that in Tower 7 fared during fires? In 1991, for example, the 38 story 1 Meridian Plaza in Philadelphia had an eight floor fire that burned for eighteen hours and yet the building didn't collapse. In 1988, the 62 story first Interstate Bank building in Los Angeles had a massive fire that started on the Twelfth Floor. There was no structural failure. In 2017, the 24 story Grenfell Tower in London burned for over twenty four hours, and yet the internal steel withstood the fire. So why then did Building 7 collapse after just seven hours of burning in a way that no steel frame building anywhere in the world has ever collapsed. With the support of a group called Architects and Engineers for nineeleven Truth, Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks conducted an independent study whose findings were released in 2020. Professor Hulsey found that office fires of the kind in Building 7 And 911 could not have produced sufficient thermal expansion to cause the crucial girder to fail. It's impossible, he found. And more significantly, he and his team found that NIST's explanation does not account for what anyone can see on video, which is that the entire building came down all at once. Not in a progressive collapse, but in a total collapse. Something else, therefore, must have triggered the downfall. There's only one thing that could have triggered a collapse like the one we saw on television, and that is a controlled demolition. That was his conclusion. Our ability to analyze the collapse is limited by the video that we have. We don't have footage of the south side of the building where the fires were because the cameras there were likely destroyed or obstructed by the collapse of the Twin Towers. One issue with the controlled demolition hypothesis is that the widely circulated video of the building coming down is selectively edited. In fact, the building did not exactly collapse all at once. It came down in two stages. What you're seeing now is the full video of the collapse. It shows the penthouse collapsing first and then very quickly, the rest of the building going. The unedited video leaves more questions than it answers. It calls into question the official NIST narrative, but it doesn't conclusively show a controlled demolition either. Because of how quickly authorities shipped the rubble overseas, we did not get a thorough investigation into the destruction. But one group of scientists did collect and test four samples of dust and debris collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the Second World Trade Center Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. In 02/2009, they published the results of their study in the Open Chemical Physics Journal. In those samples, the scientists found distinctive red gray chips full of highly energetic and thermitic material. In other words, they found traces of explosive compounds. To its credit, NIST report did investigate multiple hypothetical blast scenarios, but found to carry out on any floor in the building without detection and would have required removing or cutting columns with welding torches and placing wires for demolition. NIST found that window breakage patterns on visible floors was not at all like expected from a blast. NIST did not test residue from the attacks for thermite, but did note that thermite burns slowly relative to explosive materials and would require several minutes in contact with a massive steel section to heat it to a temperature that would result in substantial weakening. Additionally, they estimated that at least point one three pounds of thermite be required to heat each pound of steel section to approximately 700 degrees Celsius, the temperature at which steel weakens substantially. Which means that if Building 7 were demolished using thermite, many thousands of pounds of thermite would need to have been placed inconspicuously ahead of time, remote ignited, and somehow held in direct contact with the surface of hundreds of massive structural components to weaken the building, making it an unlikely substance for achieving a controlled demolition. NIST also says that an explosion big enough to take down the building would have been considerably louder than any noises recorded around the time the building collapsed. Yet eyewitness accounts say they did hear explosions inside the building. Speaker 7: All this time, I'm hearing all type of explosions. All this time, I'm hearing explosions. Speaker 0: We attempted to interview that witness. His name was Barry Jennings. But he died at the untimely age of 53, just two days before NIST released its report on Tower 7. The film director Spike Lee attempted to cover this story in an HBO docuseries entitled NYC epicenters September twenty twenty one and a half. In an interview with the New York Times, Lee said the amount of heat that it takes to make steel melt, that temperature's not reached. And then the juxtaposition of the way the Building 7 fell to the ground, when you put it next to other building collapses that were demolitions, it's like you're looking at the same thing. For saying this, Lee was excoriated by the press, which usually lionizes him. He suggested the official nine eleven narrative might be wrong, and for doing so, he was called an anti Semitic conspiracy theorist by the Times of Israel. In the end, Lee re edited his docu series and removed portions that were skeptical of the official story of the collapse of Building 7. Where do you keep your most valuable possessions? Not your necktie or a pair of socks, but things you wouldn't want to replace or maybe couldn't. Heirlooms from your parents, birth certificate, your firearms, your grandfather's shotgun. Where do you store those? Under the bed? In the back of a closet? No. That's unwise and maybe unsafe. Liberty Safe is the place to store them. I would know I have a colonial safe from Liberty Safe. It's in my garage. It's the best. I keep everything in there. It's a ProFlex system, allows you to design the inside of your safe in a way that works for you. It's not a fixed setup. Someone else puts the shelves in, you have to deal with it. You make it the way you want it. Have a stock of rifles? You can make room. Need more shells for handguns, for documents, for valuables, for gold. You can do whatever you want. You can refigure your safe in minutes. Maximum flexibility, maximum convenience. Liberty Safe is America's number one safe company made in The United States. Great people. I know them. Visit libertysafe.com. Use the code Tucker 10 at checkout for 10 off. Franklin and Colonial Safe featuring the ProFlex interior that you customize. You're gonna dig it. We definitely plus they're good looking, I will say. Another unusual aspect of Building Seven's collapse is that some media outlets reported it happened before it actually happened. Here's footage of the BBC reporting that Tower 7 was down. Keep in mind, this was filmed live twenty minutes before Building 7 actually collapsed. Speaker 5: Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse? Speaker 0: Salomon Brothers was Building Seven's major tenant. You can see the tower in the background of the shot. Was that just rushed reporting on the day of the attacks? Or did the BBC have advanced word that the building was coming down? If the media did have foreknowledge of the events that day, they weren't alone. Buried deep in the nine eleven commission report on page four ninety nine, one easily missed footnote says there was a surge in put options, investments that profit when stock prices fall. These put options were put against United Airlines parent company, They were placed on September 6 and then against American Airlines on September 10. Incredibly, the report goes on to note that 95% of the trade against United Airlines was made by a single US based institutional investor. So who was that investor? Well, we don't know. The US government is still hiding his name. They refuse to tell us. Why? No one will say. The commission report says an investigation by the FBI found out the trades were, quote, innocuous, whatever that means. Researchers have since discovered that these trades are far from innocuous, with trading volumes showing statistical significance, massive statistical significance. There were other trades too. On September 7, the number of put options placed against British Airways was four times the normal volume. The number of put options against American Airlines on the day before the attack was 285 times the normal volume. In the days before the attacks, put options surged against Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch. Both banks had sizable offices in the World Trade Center. There were also notable surges in gold and oil call options in advance of the attacks. But who could have known the attacks were coming apart from Al Qaeda? One highly significant, yet often overlooked aspect of the nine eleven attacks, is that foreign intel agencies, including those of ostensible allies, likely had detailed prior knowledge of the event. Speaker 8: These nine eleven hijackers had come from Germany. Were the Germans asleep at the switch, or did they just not tell us anything about these people? Speaker 0: John Kiriakou was chief of counterintelligence on the Bin Laden unit. Speaker 8: What about the Israelis? What about the Saudis? There is solid evidence that members of the Saudi royal family were working with Al Qaeda terrorists. Speaker 0: The nine eleven commission, not surprisingly, ignored this subject altogether. Here's what we know. As early as January 2001, France's foreign intelligence service learned that Al Qaeda was planning a hijacking plot involving a US airline. What did the French tell The United States and when? We don't know. But the French are not alone. Others knew. Well, there's no doubt that the Israelis and probably the British had better information than the people Speaker 7: working against Osama bin Laden and the agency much better information. Speaker 0: Michael Scheuer ran the CIA's bin Laden unit in the late 1990s. One reason foreign governments may have had superior information is that the NSA frequently shared signals intelligence details with them, details it withheld from our own CIA. Signals intelligence is a type of espionage that deals with intercepting phone calls and radio communications. Speaker 7: We needed the collection of signals intelligence out of Afghanistan, and since there was no central telephone company or communications companies, it was very limited. You had to be lucky to find the signal. Well, we found a couple of signals, and we shared the information with NSA, and they collected information and wouldn't share it with us in the raw form. NSA reports are generally summaries of what people say over the phone. You don't really know always who's talking to who. The first thing we did when we got the first copies of translated material, we sent them to NSA and said, can you please provide the other half of this to us? And they said, thank you very much, but under the 1947 act that created NSA, we don't have to share that with anyone and we're not going to. But somehow, the Israelis and the Saudis always were able to find out something was there that they wanted. And so when we refused, they'd call the White House, the White House had called the DCI, and the DCI would say give it to them. Speaker 0: We know very little about NSA's foreknowledge of nine eleven because the nine eleven commission barely investigated it. Keep in mind, the NSA is the largest American intel agency by far, And yet, the commission never assigned a staff member to research NSA files, in part because some of the nine eleven commissioners and staff simply did not understand what the NSA was and what it did. Even now, the NSA's terrorism archives still have never been thoroughly reviewed by outside investigators. If someone ever did go through those files, they'd likely find a treasure trove of previously undisclosed warnings about the nineeleven attacks. The NSA was the primary agency responsible for monitoring the switchboard through which Al Qaeda operatives communicated with each other. Speaker 7: It's certainly an absurdity for what American people pay for signals intelligence to be collected, translated, and supplied to the intelligence community to have the British, the Saudis, the Israelis getting information from our national security agency that we are, we and the agency were not privileged enough to get. Speaker 0: A number of foreign governments may have had foreknowledge of nine eleven, but the Israeli government stands out in particular. And here's why. On the morning of 09:11, a group of five Israeli nationals purported to have witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen to be celebrating the event. At the time, the celebrations received quite a bit of mainstream media coverage. Speaker 9: Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on The US, who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11. Speaker 0: It's striking to see operatives from a supposedly allied country celebrating the mass murder of Americans. But it is true that some in Israel saw the attack as a good thing for them. A 09/12/2001 article in the New York Times quotes now Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responding to the nine eleven attacks. Quote, it is very good, before adding, well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy. Netanyahu predicted that the attack would strengthen the bond between our two peoples because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but The United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror. According to FBI documents, the Israelis caught celebrating the nine eleven attacks had videotaped the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and may have possessed foreknowledge of the same. When the Israelis were arrested in New Jersey, they were carrying box cutters, multiple passports, thousands of dollars in cash, and photos of themselves smiling with the World Trade Center burning in the background. Speaker 7: The Israelis are always for the Israelis first, last, always. They don't like The United States except, for the most part, our money. And yet our National Security Agency is producing information for them but not shareable with its own people. Speaker 0: Go figure. According to FBI records, polygraph tests administered by the FBI suggested that they did not have foreknowledge of the attacks, but did engage in deception and were likely involved in illegal foreign counterintelligence. They were spying in The United States. The leader of the group, a man called Dominic Suter, fled to Israel on or around 09/14/2001, and he was later included on an FBI anti terror watch list distributed to European allies in May 2002. Most of the Israelis were held in FBI detention for two and a half months before they were deported for visa violations, a common way to expel foreign intel assets from allied countries. Speaker 8: The Israelis pride themselves on having infiltrated every Arab intelligence service, every terrorist group. Did the Israelis know about nine eleven and not tell us? Speaker 0: One memorandum submitted to the nine eleven commission presented substantial evidence suggesting that numerous art students from Israel, who were in fact Israeli intel assets, have been strategically across The United States. It's hard not to notice that they lived near the future nine eleven hijackers. Speaker 7: There were groups of Israelis traveling around the country as artists, sketching things happened happened to be one time around Cape Canaveral, remember, and other places where there were certainly things to to paint and sketch, but also noticeably near military installations or some other kind of installation in the government. So I think that's an open question yet. Speaker 0: The so called Israeli art students centered their operations in Hollywood, Florida and Northern New Jersey. Those are the exact locations of the hijackers before the attack. According to the memorandum, quote, it is very difficult to believe based on the existing evidence and the location of their common central operating bases, that this group was not tracking the future hijackers and their collaborators as well. According to the Ford, a Jewish publication, quote, the Israeli government acknowledged the operation and apologized for not coordinating it with Washington. Within a week of the attack, Israeli intelligence officials claimed they warned The United States about large scale terror attacks on highly visible targets in The United States. But the specifics of those warnings have never been made public. There's no evidence they happened. Speaker 7: In fact, in the whole time I worked in counterterrorism from '92 till 02/2004, I never saw one piece of information from Speaker 0: the Israelis that was really worth anything. As Americans, we need Washington to create a new, truly independent commission, one that does not lie, and that instead investigates what happened on 09/11 and answers the questions we've posed in this episode: Who made the decision to ship the debris from the attacks out of this country immediately, and why? What was the role of the CIA office in Building 7? What signals intelligence did the NSA have in relation to the plot? And how much of it did they share with foreign governments? What did those foreign governments know and fail to tell The United States? The American public deserves answers immediately to those questions. These are all questions the nineeleven Commission itself ignored. Why did the FBI's most wanted poster for Osama bin Laden, updated in November 2001, omit any mention of the nineeleven attacks? Why did it take the government five years to release footage of the Pentagon? And why were there only two publicly available videos of the Pentagon crash? The Pentagon was one of the most heavily secured and surveilled buildings on planet Earth. And yet, even now, more than twenty years later, there are only two videos. Why did US forces abruptly bury Osama bin Laden at sea and never release any photograph of his body? How hard, by the way, would it be for amateur pilots with only to navigate to Lower Manhattan and crash into a building? The majority of hijackers were flagged for additional screening at the airport. How did they get on those watch lists? And why didn't security slow them down? Why wasn't there substantial wreckage of Flight 93 at its supposed crash site in Shanksville, Pennsylvania? We were told the crash of that aircraft was so powerful that it vaporized the aircraft's hull, and yet the hijackers' passports were found intact at the site. How does that work? And who was being protected by the commission's unwillingness to answer these questions? Someone was. None of these questions were even asked by the nineeleven Commission. It's time that someone asked them and that the government answers them. On 09/11/2001, nearly 3,000 people were murdered. In the years that followed, hundreds of thousands more perished as a result of our response to those attacks. The government enacted measures that suspended constitutional protections. The freedoms this country was created to protect are gone now. The government employed illegal warfare tactics, including torture and the murder of innocent individuals. Those attacks fundamentally altered the way America operates, the way all of us live here. And yet not everyone suffered in the aftermath of nine eleven. Some emerged the winners. Reveal who profited from nine eleven in the next installment of our series. Thank you for watching the nine eleven files. The next episode drops next week, or you can unlock the entire five part series right now, ad free, by becoming a TCN member. Members also get access to the watch companion, a guide to the timeline, the key figures, the primary sources that we went to to bring you this documentary. You can read along as you watch. Join us today at tuckercarlson.com for the whole series all at once to support our investigative work. We couldn't do any of this without our members. We're grateful for you, so thanks.

@TRobinsonNewEra — Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Posted - July 27, 2024 at 1:06 PM

Saved - July 27, 2024 at 6:06 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

Britain's banned documentary - SILENCED https://t.co/HKIBPsuZTA

Video Transcript AI Summary

This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his own experience of being silenced by a gagging order and criticizes the mainstream media for manipulating stories and pushing certain narratives. The video discusses a case involving two boys, Bailey and Jamal, and how the media portrayed their altercation. It questions the accountability of the media and the effectiveness of the legal system. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and his connection to Antifa is highlighted, demonstrating biased reporting and a disregard for the truth. A man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and lawyer Mohammed Akanji of endangering his family and colluding with Antifa. He questions the integrity of the legal system and media, expressing concern for the safety of witnesses and his family. He calls for support in his legal battle, emphasizing the importance of free speech.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The documentary you're about to watch is the most important documentary I've ever made. This story is far bigger than Tommy Robinson. This is about the weaponization and the politicization of these buildings. Court buildings across the west. The Royal Courts of Justice, ironically named. These buildings have been weaponized and used against members of the public to destroy them if they speak out. From Donald Trump to Steve Bannon, to Gert Wilders, to Marie Le Pen, to Katie Hopkins. That's what's happening. My job as a journalist, I stand for freedom of speech. I stand for freedom of press. And I failed. Because 3 years ago, when I lost a court case in here, then they banked me to the tune of £1,600,000. On a documentary, you're gonna see the entire story was a lie. Okay? I failed because I should have come out of court and I should have played you that film. Why didn't I play you that film? Because I was given a gagging order by this building, by this judge. I was silent and I allowed them to silence me because I was scared. I was scared of 2 years in prison. I was scared of the effect that solitary confinement for that length of time would have on me. I was scared of jihadi gangs in jail and I was scared of the effect it would have on my family. I failed me and I failed you. I'm not gonna fail myself again. You're now gonna watch the best citizen journalism and the most incredible expose of the establishment you've ever seen. The news is how we find out what's happening in the world. It's how we form our opinions. Opinions based on facts. That's the key. Facts. Facts should be delivered to you by journalists based on the truth. But what if what they're delivering you isn't the truth? What if it's stories that are manipulated to make you think a certain way, to follow a certain narrative, different people's agendas? And what do they do to those who go against that mainstream narrative? Those who try to expose the truth. This is a documentary about the lengths they will go to to shut down and silence anyone from bringing you, the British public, the truth. Alright. Smell me off. Obviously, not me. Speaker 1: I lost my job over this. No. I'm just kidding this. Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit. Speaker 3: He's won the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it. Speaker 2: Well, it's all very liberating. Speaker 4: This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. I'm not Speaker 5: standing. Speaker 0: You're not going, but No. Because no. Because what yous are doing, I know what yous are doing. Speaker 6: Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, aye. This is a documentary Speaker 0: about the a documentary about the unholy alliance between the media, the justice system, and our politicians. How they conspire to suppress free speech, how they pervert democracy, and how the truth and your freedoms are just 2 of the casualties. We will show how the mainstream media deceives people, how they ignore the truth, how the lies of the virtue signalling, BBC, IT Fear, and Channel 4 are all about their poisonous agenda, no matter the cost to innocent people. It's also a documentary about how an everyday playground incident between 2 young lads was spun into global news at a terrible cost to so many people, not least the 2 young lads themselves. We will show how the law is being abused, how people driven by hateful ideologies attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who dares to challenge the so called progressive, so called liberal narrative. We will show the foolishness of our fear driven political leaders who jumped on a story, took a side without knowing the truth, or worse still, knowing it but hiding it because the truth didn't fit their narrative regardless of the human cost. And we'll ask 3 important questions. Firstly, is the media accountable to anyone in any way for what they report? Years after the Levinson inquiry, has anything changed, or do they continue to act with impunity? Secondly, is our legal system still fit for purpose? We will show how lawyers who hate Britain but love jihadi warriors have weaponized the law system against us and how the legal system really only works for the rich. And finally, how do we keep our politicians accountable? If the police, the cause, and the state can silence anyone for speaking inconvenient truths, truths that may raise questions about government policy? Is the UK any different from China, Russia, or Iran in their treatment of dissidents? And, of course, for Piers Morgan, for Jeremy Fine, for the BBC ITV, and channel 4, it's a tutorial on journalism. Keep watching it. You'll learn. Our story appears to start and end in a brief playground incident at Ormondbury Community School in Huddersfield. A playground scuffle. One boy poured a bottle of water on another child. The school dealt with it and that should have been that. 3 weeks later, however, a video clip of the incident surfaced and within hours, with the help of lawyers and the ignorant rant ins of ITV's Piers Morgan and the BBC's Jeremy Vine, it was made into global news event. And the lives of so many people were turned upside down. Such playground incidents happen every day. So why was this spat between 2 boys transformed into global news? Well, one of the boys was white and the other a Syrian refugee, at which point the truth of the matter was buried beneath an avalanche of agendas and opportunism. Within hours, the race hate brigade was sharpening their blades. Speaker 7: But clearly when somebody comes from Syria fleeing Assad's regime, coming to a place like this, when they get treated that way, that's an issue, and the whole world is looking at us. Speaker 0: Where are we? We're in Almunbury. Do I say the scene of the incident? Is it a scene in it's the incident? It's the scene of the great lie. I call it the great lie because this lie was pushed around the globe. Yeah? This here is the school where the world was told a Syrian refugee was waterboarded by a racist English bully. It was in a playing field here, and do you know what? This is the first time I've been here. Because when this blew up on the news, it's a child's school. Kids are in school. I didn't come outside here. You see the scenes outside here where the imam was here with mobs of men. Yeah? Mobs of Muslim men. Extremists traveled up from London such as Ali Dua to cause a scene outside this this kids' school. Anyway, but I'm here. Why am I here? I'm here because I faced a court case. I'm being prosecuted. It's gone it's gone to the high court, and I have to prove I made a video stating that it was a lie, stating that Jamal wasn't innocent, and telling some facts about Jamal beating up girls, an instance that I've been warned about by the members of this community to tell the truth about what happened at this school. I've gotta prove it in court, so I've come to Huddersfield. I'm now gonna knock. I need to find witnesses. I've got addresses for many. I need to knock and talk to them and see who I can get to come to court to help me prove to you, the public, this is about as much as proven in court as proving to you, the British public, that I was the only journalist in the country who told the truth about what happened in this community. The story you were told. You were told a vulnerable Syrian child refugee had been bullied and waterboarded by a nasty white boy. You were told it was a racist attack. You were told of the dangers of Far Right extremism. You were invited to agree that this kind of intolerance could not be tolerated. Was he vulnerable? Was it a racist attack? Our evidence shows the answers to both these questions was no. Was the Syrian lad waterboarded? Why was this word used? What about this? No. Was that waterboarding? Take a look at this. It shows a group of non white children beating up a white girl. It went viral online, but it wasn't touched by the mainstream media. It wasn't made into a global story. Why not? Meanwhile, the usual suspects had lit the fire and were gleefully stoking the flames. Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Speaker 0: And of course, the politicians. They're always quick to jump on the bandwagon. Theresa May, Sajid Javid, Naz Shah, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill's grandson. Such moral outrage. And it's not just the media and the politicians. In today's Twitter and Facebook driven worlds where celebrities and groups compete to virtue signal, most of them driven by the warm feeling they get by expressing their moral outrage or by fear. The fear of what might happen to them if they don't. Everyone who's anyone pumped the Bailey Jamal story. Boxers, Lennox Lewis, Huddersfield Football Club, celebrities from across the globe. Let's have a look at all of the celebrities and Blue Tick Brigade who pumped the Jamal story. And here are some of the people who pumped the story you watched earlier of the white girl getting beaten up. Sadly, whether it's politicians, celebrities, or other groups, None of them are wise enough or pause long enough to ask whether they have the whole story, to check the facts, to find the truth. But why let the truth get in the way of such a good story? And this story was just too good a story. 2 lads in a playground scrap is not international news, but racist white thug water boards helpless Syrian refugee. Boom. Racism can't be tolerated. Beware of the far right. That's their kind of story. We'll hear more about the militant left later but they clearly weren't gonna miss out on this. Speaker 7: Well, we well, representing might be too harsh a word, but I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm here as as a concerned citizen. Speaker 0: Mohammed Amin Pandur, a Mufti on a mission. He rushed to Ulman Bire from his mosque in Bali, a town at the far end of the district. In fact, there's 40 mosques closer to this school. But perhaps Mufti Pandor had his own agenda. You see, his little brother, Councillor Shabir Pandor, is the leader of Kirkland East Councilman Huntsfield. And they were having some pretty bad news days at that time. By the way, Mufti Pandor, he's the same guy who ordered the Islamic mob to come to the school in Batley and demand the second of the RE teacher who showed a cartoon of Mohammed in a discussion about free speech. Speaker 7: Look look at what we do as a community, and you'll understand our stance. So what has happened is totally unacceptable. Yeah? And we have made sure that the school understands that. The teacher has been suspended. The teacher has been suspended. Speaker 0: You may recall the teacher had to flee, and he's still in hiding under police protection. Luckily, he hasn't ended up like Samuel Patti, the French teacher who's beheaded for having a similar discussion in a classroom about free speech. You see, free speech is essential for any society wishing to maintain intellectual and social progress, but not all societies are bothered about intellectual and social progress. Should we be silenced by the demands of Mufti Pandor and Sharia Law? Should we sacrifice our freedom of speech? Should we sacrifice the free and open exchange of ideas? Should we sacrifice the cultural inheritance of which we are all custodians? But back to the bad news days in Kirklees and the playground incident in 2018. There was also Kirklees counselor, Masood Ahmed. Speaker 9: I'm not aware of there's a problem at the school. That's something I obviously need to find out in terms of that there is a problem at this school, and that is something I will definitely be picking up. Speaker 0: Now some of you may remember this. Speaker 10: Michael, are you gonna explain what's gonna happen next? Right? Speaker 0: Are you being arrested? Speaker 7: You won't be arrested. Speaker 0: I am being arrested. Speaker 5: A breach of peace. Speaker 0: I'm of course. Speaker 5: Of the I'm of Speaker 7: course a breach of peace. Speaker 0: I'm being arrested. The content of what Speaker 5: you're Can Speaker 11: we just Speaker 5: say streaming The content of what I'm streaming told. I'm being Speaker 10: arrested for breach of peace. The game. I've been Speaker 0: Can you Speaker 12: just turn off your Speaker 11: life, please? Yeah. Speaker 5: Do you want to someone just What's that? Speaker 11: Can you Speaker 0: just explain it again? You want to Speaker 13: rest in suspicion Speaker 5: following the breach of the people? Speaker 0: What what does that mean? What what does that mean? At the same time as this playground spat between 2 young lads, 20 Huddersfield men were being jailed across Yorkshire at Leeds Crown Court for what would be the biggest grooming gang Britain has ever seen. Ultimately, 35 almost exclusively Muslim men would be given 380 years in prison for grooming, trafficking, and raping young children, most of whom were known to counsely Pandora's Kirklees Council. Mufti Pandor traveled for half an hour to rabble rouse a gang outside the school gates over this playground incident. When within a couple of mile radius in Batley, police have arrested a further 99 men in relation to historic sex crimes. So far 32 have been charged including 1 Ibrahim Pandor, 41 of Batley. That makes it the highest destination of grooming gang arrests anywhere in the UK. We Googled to see what Mufti Pandor has said about these grooming gang atrocities. Nothing. We Googled to see what counsel and sued Ahmed's condemnation. Nothing. In fact we can't find the condemnation from the of these brother either, Councillor Shabir Pandor, leader of the council. Just one statement from him reported in June 2019, telling the National Working Group of Child Sexual Eratiation Response Unit that his authority had moved forward. That's it. They've moved on. Never mind grooming gangs, gang rape of young children, all these men seem to be far more concerned about what happened in a playground at Ormerbury Community School or about cartoons of their prophet Mohammed. I think I now realize how difficult this is gonna be because everyone we've spoke to today, Speaker 1: they're all confirming what I Speaker 0: said was true. Everyone's confirming what Jamal was like, including school staff. But as soon as I mention this camera, as soon as I mention court, I need someone to come to court, they're just totally silent straight away. No. We no. No one can have said that. No one can have said this. You jump in. It's raining. But I'm realizing how difficult it's gonna be but I have got an idea for that now after today. So but first stop, McDonald's. Yeah? Let's go to McDonald's because I'm starving. It's been a long day. Speaker 13: Yeah. I'll see you on a YouTube. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: Nice to Speaker 13: see you. Speaker 0: Smaller in real life. Nice to see you. Speaker 5: Nice to meet Speaker 0: you, mate. Speaker 13: Carry off on your drink. Speaker 0: No. I'm fine. Thank you. Cheers, though. You're good. Yeah. Thanks, man. Oh, man. Very nice to see you. Oh, thank you, bro. Hello? Speaker 2: Steve, how Speaker 0: are you, mate? It's Tommy. How Speaker 11: are you? Speaker 0: I'm good, mate. Doing good. Bro, mate, have you still got all those hidden cameras? Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course, I have. Yeah. Speaker 0: Could I borrow them? You need Yeah. But when I say borrow them, can I borrow I'm gonna need to take them for weeks because I've got so much to do? It's a long story. I'll explain when I see you. But, I'm in a bit of a situation. I need some hidden cameras. Speaker 5: This is not a problem. I have put some kit together for you. Speaker 0: That's it. So that's the idea. The idea is I've got a friend there, secret Steve, who has all sorts of cameras, yeah. He's a he's a private investigator. I need to show the public everything I've heard today. I need the public to hear and know the truth. I need them to know how much they've been lied to by the media about what happened in this town. And, the only way, unfortunately, the only way I'm gonna be able to do that is with hidden cameras. Because today, I've heard the truth, but I need everyone of you to know the truth, and everyone's too scared. That's why I said Project Fear. Everyone is too scared to speak the truth or to come to court. So I'm gonna end up getting I'm gonna end up getting hammered in court. The whole world told I've lied when I haven't. I was the only journalist in the UK who told the truth. So we need to prove it. So we'll shoot down the motorway now. We'll go get these hidden cameras. These are all so this is a tie. There's a camera in that. That's the camera. Mad, isn't it? There's a camera there. You've got everything here. Cameras, glasses. I don't wear glasses. That's gonna be awkward. That's the bottom of a cup coffee cup. So you put that on the bottom of the coffee cup. I feel like James Bond. This today, that's the camera. I'll have to take this off, but it doesn't matter because apparently this records all the audio, records everything. That's the camera and I feel a little bit dirty doing this. But it is the only way I'm gonna get people to speak. And then I need you to hear what I hear. Speaker 1: The idea that people would move over the streets looking for him was appalling. The fact that the video itself, although it showed the accumulation of things that built up to that, did not deserve what happened to him or to anybody else in that situation. We knew that I'm afraid the media, I call it a perfect storm. I was getting, emails from Pakistan, from Australia, from America telling me to resign. So it went worldwide, and I'm afraid I came into teaching to help poor people, and they got me today. I've got a problem here. I lost my job over this. And as a result, the council has told me that I cannot speak to anybody ever about it. So unfortunately When you asked to go over to me about anything? I was there when it happened. I was there when I dealt with all the situation. And then, Ofsted came, then Trevor wasn't there anymore. That's that's all I can say. Well, I can't get a job. So that's where it's left me. And I can live with that, but barely only 15. I'm not with her. That's different. Speaker 11: It's got a Speaker 1: pretty good man. It's a young man with No. No. If I do, Speaker 5: I think Speaker 0: you get Speaker 1: myself into Speaker 11: real trouble. No. Okay. Speaker 1: I thought really serious trouble. Legal trouble because partly cancels You signed an NDA or something? Correct. So they've said, you can't be split free. I'm not with the NDA so you keep the pension. So you get pension? Yeah. Fucking hell, bro. I have to be very careful about what I say to it. I'm not allowed to talk about it. I really am not. So I can't discuss it. I can't discuss it with the media. I always wanted to have my say against it, which I've never had, Never been allowed to have. Never be allowed to say goodbye to my staff. They're just told to leave. So I've worked there nearly 30 years. Actually, 20 years and never got a card, never got a goodbye. This whole thing was just used. The whole thing was used. Yes. Could push him in over there. And hijacked and by by by the right of it politic I'm quite a political person by the right and the left. It was hijacked and spun all out of the position and now we've got problems. That's interesting. What? I thought she looked 1 more meters of all the silence. What a mess. It is a it is a mess, but but it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy for Bailey. I'm not sure, Jamar, will get anything out of this ever in his life, positive out of it either. Necessarily, might have he might have got a few, silver coins from Julius, but that's about it. You know, that that's it. The thing is that they haven't 6 weeks, prior or weeks prior. And then in the same day at the same time, if you look for the to go fund me up, the site was released. Yeah. Now you see your full picture together? Speaker 0: Already, that's gold. Yeah. I know that's gold. All I hope, I hope that's recorded. I can't turn a computer on. So I just pray that's got the audio and the visual and it's not pointing up there that we've got it because that was the head teacher and that's the first visit. And I know this is gonna work. So I now need I know just off that, I didn't think he'd talk before he shut the door on my face. He didn't. He seemed like he wanted to talk. There's a lot he wants to say. So but, yeah, let's go. Next stretch. Yeah? It's exciting. Was there a racism problem in the school and Speaker 5: Well, no. I don't I don't I don't think there was. Speaker 0: What about other Syrian refugees? Like, do you think what happened to Jamal in the school was because he was a Syrian refugee? Speaker 5: No. Not at all. I told you before That that would have happened Speaker 1: No, ma'am. Speaker 5: If the child was white, big, blue, whatever color. Speaker 0: They're all scared. Speaker 5: Yeah. A lot of careers on there. I work for operation service now. Speaker 0: You do now? Speaker 5: Yeah. So I don't know where I stand with it. If I go, I could lose the job. Speaker 1: What about if Speaker 0: you know, I don't want You Speaker 5: know what someone said? I work Speaker 0: I get it, bro. Speaker 5: I work for probation service now. You see, if Speaker 0: I didn't work for You see, if you're someone Speaker 5: If I didn't if I didn't work for the fucking public sector no more, I'd say, god, they can go fuck themselves. They can't. You know what I mean? Speaker 0: So they seem to be pretty keen on these NDAs. Speaker 1: Who is that? Speaker 5: That is counsel. But I can't disclose that with you. That's what? Lords. I'm saying I can't disclose it because I Yes. Assigned it. Speaker 1: That incident was talked about by Theresa May at a g twenty summit. He asked her a question about it. We were then offsteaded by 5 of the top inspectors in the country. We'd only send 1 registered inspector. We have the head of safeguarding. We are I had a member speaking to me about it. If you want my opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shut that school. Get up there and get rid of this. Speaker 0: Get rid of the problem. Speaker 1: Over to the Bailey. Speaker 0: Correct. Over to Mal. Speaker 11: Correct. Get rid Speaker 1: of the problem. Over to Mal. Correct. Get rid of the problem. Get rid of it. But why do you think that is? Do you think because I'm not Jamal. Jamal, because he come here 2 years ago. I've got so many negative things said about it now for so many people. Well, I mean, so many. You in a few before. We have non Syrian children. Non families. Yep. We're not one issue. Speaker 0: Well, Well, my my view is Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: That you won't get much of an answer out of all because you work there and it's bound by various confidentiality. So Speaker 1: Long disclosure of business. Speaker 0: Do you get paid as well? Not been to me. Speaker 1: They all have. Every teacher got paid not to tell the truth. Speaker 0: But the head teacher can't even talk about Jamelle at all. Speaker 2: No. No. They cannot. Speaker 1: Both, can you? Shouldn't it? Speaker 0: Well, if you work it out, it must be a good one. Speaker 1: Mustn't it? Did Speaker 0: you work Speaker 1: there as well? Speaker 2: No. I was the chair of goodness there. But so it's it's not What my issue Speaker 0: is is Speaker 2: you're not gonna get anywhere. Speaker 1: No. No. No. Yeah. Speaker 2: And Rob wouldn't talk to you either. So it's Speaker 0: They're trying to Speaker 12: It's pointless me even giving you I told but Speaker 0: I told the truth. Your contact details Okay. Wouldn't work with us. Speaker 1: I told the truth about Speaker 0: what happened that day. Speaker 10: I am not even arguing. Speaker 1: His life was destroyed. Speaker 2: Well, that's not fair either, is it? Speaker 0: As a racist bully, and he won't. And he wasn't. I know. And Speaker 2: I both know that. Speaker 14: Truth is just Speaker 1: How much money is it? Speaker 5: I can't see the figure because if I see the figure, it goes out. Speaker 1: Because, mate 18. 18. Speaker 0: I've just found out. Well, the head teacher's told us already that he was blackmailed and threatened. I've just found out of Kumar. He was paid £18,000. Paid he said, I can't take I signed. I I was paid. So paid what? He was paid money by the local council, so he can't tell the truth about what's going on in that school. Then they've they've give everyone non disclosure agreements from school staff to governors to and and Paul Coomar to get £18,000. He's not even involved. If you live here, if you live in this area, your tax money he's got 18 grand what must the head teacher have got? He must have got 6 figures. How much money have they spent on this lie? We put in a freedom of information request to Kirklees Council to find out exactly how much they had spent of taxpayers' money to get the silence of their staff. They didn't answer the first request. They avoided the second. Only when we sent them legal letters because they have to, by law, answer these questions, did we get our answer. They had spent over a quarter of £1,000,000. £275,000 of taxpayers' money was spent making people remain silent. But they've they've they've spent money silencing everybody, so no one can ever this is for ever, once you sign that agreement, no one can ever tell the truth While they push this manufactured lie that destroyed lives, schools, communities, everyone's life. I've seen life after life after life, person after person's life destroyed, while the council, your local council, Kirkley's council, give away 100 of £1,000 to make sure that the truth can never be told. I can't believe it. I knew from day dot, I asked myself the question, when this was blowing up and I knew the truth, I kept saying, how come no teacher is telling the truth? If all those teachers know what's going on in that school, how come none of them are coming out and saying? Well, now we know. Now the whole world's gonna know, because corporate council paid them not to. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Jamal was in India? Speaker 3: Yeah, he was in the same Speaker 11: well. What was his what Speaker 0: was Jamal's attitude about in school? Speaker 3: He wasn't very nice. He called female teachers bitches. He just didn't really have respect for the female students, to be honest. Yeah. Basically, we were in a p lesson, and we were playing hockey with a teacher called Mr. Cattell. And I had taken the hockey puck off of Jamal, because I was on the other team, and sent it to the other side of the room where my team mates were. And I then turned around and just felt a really sharp pain in my back, and he'd swung the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it. Speaker 0: Is there do you think there's any way that could have been an accident? Speaker 3: No. It knocked me to my knees. Speaker 0: It knocked you to your knees. How how long have your mom been in school when this happened? Speaker 3: About 2 weeks. I've had lasting injuries from it. It's caused me to have severe pain in my top in the top of my back and, I'm on medication for the pain. Speaker 0: Still now? Speaker 1: Yeah. Did Speaker 0: Jamelle get in trouble for this? Speaker 3: Not that I'm aware of. Speaker 0: First, I wanna apologize to anyone I've been forced to record with a hidden camera. Sadly, people are terrified to tell the truth because of the potential consequences, but the truth still needs to be told. Speaker 1: Do you know if you do remember of any any incident specifically with tomorrow with those? Speaker 2: Well, do you remember that one there, it it got go with octetick, won't it? Speaker 0: Yeah. Charlie. Speaker 2: Charlie. Yeah. Speaker 1: Don't get the name there. Yeah. You must go. Lovely little girl. Yeah. Speaker 2: It just Speaker 0: wrote to him Speaker 2: of not sure to bloody nasty. No Speaker 10: he was, like, to the side of me. So he tried, like, pushing me and, like, so I quickly moved out there because obviously I knew what he would like. He would have actually hit me and stuff. Mhmm. So I moved and then he, like, moved his arms if he were gonna try and stop my face, like, back. Okay. Speaker 0: And he dropped but he did, but on that day, he spat Speaker 1: at you. What was on? Where'd the spit go? Speaker 10: Like, literally, all on me and if I'm outside and all down the school bag. Because when I went home, I told mum and mum we were disgusted in it. But the school said that that because it was outside of school time, so can't really do much about Speaker 5: it. Okay. Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit. Speaker 1: Was he? Speaker 2: Yeah. And dad. Speaker 1: 2. Speaker 2: Everybody and anybody. It does it has no respect for women at all. None. Did he even snap? No response from Speaker 11: him? No. Speaker 2: I told I told his father to all this on phone. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 4: Jamal grabbed him by his tie and was just threw him against the wall, cracked his head up and he gets back at wall and just kept throwing against the wall. This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. That's just intent to kill. Speaker 1: Were they? Speaker 10: They had, a young lad and a girl. And they were absolutely they were horrendous. The kids, they were just horrific. The the kids that they are, they used to bully the kids. Speaker 1: Oh, Jamal. Yeah. Speaker 0: See, what was Speaker 11: what Speaker 5: was Jamal like though? The dickhead. Speaker 1: Was he? Speaker 5: He spent he he came to isolation a few times. He want he want perfect child? Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 5: He was the same. Well, you know what Joe Biden did, don't you? Speaker 0: He was in isolation? Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: That's what he's in other times. Speaker 0: Was he? Speaker 11: Yeah. What Speaker 1: was he like, though? Speaker 5: Troublesome, Charles. Yeah. He's a makeup fucking star, he's Speaker 0: He used to make up stories. Speaker 5: Yeah. At at one stage, I think you see something to do with your sister. Somebody said something to his sister that I was in isolation. I just go come out and he was waiting outside isolation. I wanted to be the girl or for someone. I can't can't remember. Speaker 0: He want to be here. Yeah. Speaker 5: They did ask someone to his sister. Just one second. I'm sorry. Speaker 1: Yeah. No problem. Speaker 5: Yeah. No problem. Well, you you you you want you want he used to lie lie a lot. Speaker 0: But this whole thing was built with what he said. And if you lied a lot, light, it's a big problem. Speaker 1: What was that over? Speaker 5: Him. Oh, no. It's whatever. Oh, no. It's whatever. Or we want this or not. Did you Speaker 0: like that with lots of kids? Not really. No. Just certain kids? Speaker 11: Yeah. I would Speaker 0: say I'm like, he's got an insurance group. So he thought he could? Yeah. Yeah. So he just randomly attacked you? Yeah. Yeah. What about, your mom your mom just sank about he puts anything between his hands? Speaker 15: Oh, yeah. It was a compass. Speaker 16: I remembered it yesterday. It was just as you went. Speaker 15: It was a compass. He got he got a compass, and he was going around like when Speaker 0: he got to be Speaker 15: with proper hearted to be able to be believed in everything. And I think it was miss Ennis that proper gave him a top telling off Speaker 0: Okay. You know, you said so so say say like that instant there. You said some girl said something to my sister, and he walked away outside to beat her up. Well there are testimonies from several children who alleged they were being bullied by him. Younger children. Little girls. Mostly girls. Is Jamal the innocent victim? You've been told. I gathered these testimonies over just a few hours filming in Huddersfield. I could have carried on. Speaker 5: Yeah. I was waiting outside my pleasure to be the yellow. Speaker 0: And about the noise. Yeah. Speaker 5: I'll say about Juwani used to tell fibs. There was several times he got investigated, and it just fucking turned out to be fucking lies. Speaker 0: The fact he always lied is a big point. The fact that you know that the police the the school investigated incidents where he said things happened Yeah. And they turned out to be made up. Yeah. Speaker 5: It was thieves. They couldn't have happened. It could happen because of of the one. The child were even in school that he accused. Speaker 1: I can remember. Oh my god. Yeah. Oh my god. Speaker 5: So I'm sure he accused us another guy called Jaden. I can't remember his last name. Speaker 0: Called what? Speaker 5: Jaden. Speaker 0: Jaden. Speaker 5: He accused he accused Jaden or someone. I'm a mean miss any investigative of complex. Speaker 2: Not very likable, really. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 2: You know, about what we're gonna do to sisters and what have you bury aunt's office. Speaker 1: I'm toddlers. Speaker 2: But not a very nice boss. Speaker 1: When you say what are Speaker 0: you gonna do to your sisters? Speaker 2: Well, I told Betty, wouldn't it? Speaker 0: Tell Betty is your baby sister? Mhmm. Alright. And I'd Speaker 1: try to argue that it was in the public's interest for them to know the truth about Jamelle. Speaker 11: I know. Speaker 10: Yeah. Unless they They were just retaliating. Yeah. Speaker 2: You know, which most people know is from the side in the world's history. Speaker 0: Yeah. Jamelle seems like every kid I spoke to that he attacked was younger. Speaker 5: Yeah. Bullock. Speaker 0: Jamelle. Hey, Jamelle. Yeah. Yes. That's what I'm fine now. Yeah. Speaker 5: That's what I remember. He said he would have stabbed him or something with a science or something. I remember. He said, yeah. So he goes to come and then what he's saying now. Speaker 0: Because that thing of him getting caught with a knife in school. It's like, what? What with a knife Speaker 1: and screwdriver? Bailey gets his tail thrown in Speaker 0: a bottle of water. Speaker 5: Yeah. What the fuck? Speaker 0: Surely he gets Speaker 5: a statement on that? Speaker 0: No. Because it there's things missing. Speaker 1: But I've got I've got his dad mentioned it in Speaker 0: the minutes in the meeting. His dad mentioned it in the meeting with the school. His dad mentioned about them catching him with a knife and a screwdriver. His dad Speaker 5: his dad bought it up. I've got it I've Speaker 0: got it in black and white. Speaker 5: Yeah. You got good case there? Speaker 1: I've got Speaker 0: I've got it. Yeah. He got caught with a knife. They they can't deny it. You see, the truth was there for the media. It was there for celebrities and politicians to see. They could have told you the truth at the time before some of you gave over a £160,000 of your money to the poor victim, Jamal. Well, not so poor anymore. But none of this was true. A key part of this case is that I reported what I was told. Before my involvement in this story, a mother went online and said her daughter had been attacked by Jamal. I contacted that mother. She sent me images of her daughter. She said her little daughter was beaten by 3 Muslim girls and that Jamal jumped in and bit her daughter on the head. She sent me the images of the bite marks on her daughter's head. I said, can I speak to you? Can I interview you? I rang the mother, but the child was too scared to talk to me. Speaker 2: Too scared? Speaker 0: No. No. Everyone's scared. A girl went online and said that she had been attacked by Jamal. Both of these victims deleted their comments why. Both of these victims had gone online and reported this before my involvement at all in this case. I simply reported what they were saying. We revisited the mother's house to try and get confirmation as to why she backtracked on the story she had put out and the story she had told me. Speaker 10: I got car if you're driving. Tony Robinson's there. Speaker 0: Tell her not to worry, don't worry. Speaker 12: He said don't worry. Yeah. Speaker 0: So when you when you put online about Jamelle, what what what happened? Like what did you What happened, what was the response to that? Speaker 5: What do you mean? Speaker 0: I mean, did you receive did you receive Speaker 14: I don't receive threats. Yeah, I did. Speaker 1: What sort Speaker 0: of threats? Speaker 5: We all thought. All thought. Don't let all thought. And I'm just Speaker 0: because I'm trying to understand this. Is that, and is that because and it because what I've what I've looked at and then because Jamelle's solicitors are using a statement that you made saying that, Jamelle had nothing to do with it. But was that I'm asking is that was that in response to the re reflects your seat that you received? Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 1: It was. Okay. Speaker 5: Liar. Straight. Is this a symbol just a liar? Jamal telling fibs all the time. There's several times investigated. Fucking who found out that he's talking fucking shit. Speaker 11: I don't Speaker 0: think the whole but then I read Jamal reading reading was slightly a prepared statement on the news. Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules. Speaker 18: He used to break rule Speaker 5: all the time. Yeah. He used to lie. He used to lie a lot. He lied several times. He lied he lied several times. I caught him several times lying. Speaker 0: He's suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. And I'm finding out after teacher after teacher after teacher he's far worse than what I said. Far worse. I mean, like, far worse. He was put up on a pedestal by every single media outlet, politicians, footballers, celebrities, boxers, everybody. They're suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. All I'm knocking on the door and asking teacher after teacher after teacher is what was Jamal like? And it's just flowing. It's just boom. And he was far worse than anything I said. Far worse. I find it insane because no there is no way that all the things I'm now finding out, the neither journalists has found this out. They must have known what it was like because it hasn't been hard. Speaker 10: The Isle of Portrait, Port Bailey, the the spin. He was Speaker 1: and that Jamal was an innocent woman in London too. He wasn't. Speaker 10: Not far from that. Speaker 0: So you were told Bailey was a bully and he was a racist. He wasn't a saint in school, he'd be the 1st to admit that, but he wasn't a bully or a racist. Police concluded there was nothing racist about the scuffle, yet you were told he was vermin. You were told he needed to be dealt with. He was vilified by the media, by politicians, and by celebrities. Bailey a bully, Bailey a racist. Not according to his teachers and other children. Not according to his head teacher of his school. Who is this? He was Speaker 1: a 15 year old kid Yeah. And it it would have been, could be, have a great future. He's a very articulate lad. He's got a lot of issue about justice. Yeah. I think, you know, I could've seen him in a row or something like like that because he has that in him. Really? Yeah. And he would stand up for his peers in school where he felt things were. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 11: You know, he would do that. I just wanna tell the truth Speaker 1: about Vaden. Well His life was destroyed. Speaker 2: Well, that's not Speaker 1: fair either, is it? Speaker 2: As a racist bully, and he won. Speaker 13: And he wasn't. Speaker 0: I know. And I both Speaker 1: know that. I know. Unfortunately, the Speaker 0: truth is just I know. I know. But Bailey didn't even get to sit his GCSEs because of this campaign of hate, this perversion of the truth. What about Jamal's broken arm? Which the world was told was because of bullying. That was a like. School incident reports record that he had been punching a much younger child in the face while holding him in a headlock, and he was pushed off him, fell, and broke his arm. The police considered the incident to have been dealt with it properly. Speaker 5: You were picking you were picking I think you picked I've got an old somebody pushed him to get him off. Speaker 10: He started calling me my white fat bitch and stuff, and then he like Is Speaker 0: that what you're my mate? Speaker 11: I'm a Speaker 10: white fat bitch. Speaker 0: White fat bitch. Speaker 10: And then, I went up to him, and then he like, I took I took the bottle and then he put me in a headlock, and then my mate pushed him off me. And I believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock. Speaker 11: And I Speaker 0: believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock? Yeah. So he he physically assaulted you? Yeah. Speaker 5: You said Speaker 0: he called you mama white bitch. Speaker 10: Yeah. Is Speaker 0: that the sort of terminology he uses a lot? Yeah. Speaker 1: There's all sorts of misconceptions like the fact that he had a broken arm. Speaker 0: Oh, I've got 2 independent witnesses now. Speaker 1: He he had a year 8 kid. And another kid in year 11 stepped in and said, what are you doing? Pushed him over. Poked him off. Speaker 0: Who he had in the headlock? Speaker 4: It was must have been just start of year 11, put this kid in a headlock. One of my friends, one of my friends, didn't like how he was behaving, grabbed him and just threw him off him. Like anyone do break up a fight, they just, like, throw him off him, but this wasn't a fight. This was an all out brawl, one-sided, completely one-sided, because this kid had no match against Jamal, just threw him off him and he landed on the curb. Speaker 0: How did was he did? Jamal was in year 11? Speaker 4: Yeah. Half half the size of Jamal, easily. Speaker 0: Okay. You know, I know he was 12 and Jamal was 15. Mhmm. Speaker 4: But he was like, kind of like half size ish, kind of like, up to shoulders kind of thing. Yeah. But he still had no match against him, And my friend just grabbed him, threw him off him, he landed on a curb, and that was like it. Speaker 0: So I've read it reported in by Jeremy Biden and in the newspapers that that was an incident of Jamelle being bullied. Speaker 4: No. Exact opposite. He was bullying this kid. Speaker 1: So you see people thought that was all part of it. Speaker 0: But that's do you know why somebody destroyed it Speaker 1: for all your broken arm. Speaker 0: But do you know why they Speaker 11: do you know Speaker 1: why they thought it was part of it? Speaker 0: Because the solicitor said it was. Speaker 1: No. Well, it's not it's not true. I'm telling you, it's not true. I could even name it I won't. But I could name the child in year 8 that he did it to. Speaker 11: And I Speaker 1: could name the child in year 11 that stepped in. Speaker 0: So someone stepped in? Speaker 1: Because basically, school school is a pretty good place. Kids have good values. So if you saw a bigger kid, you'd see a little kid. He said, oh, he stepped in and said, what are you doing? Yeah. And we even had it where Speaker 0: Do you know what he said to the year 8 kid? No. Called his mom on white slag? Speaker 1: Yes. Now I've got that on camera, isn't it? Now you say it. Yes. He would have done that, and that would have been incredibly provocative for them. Speaker 0: Even in his statement to court, Jamal claims they were forced to relocate from Huddersfield for their own safety to a different part of the country. Really? Because the records say there was no most racial motivation and there was no threat at home. That's what the records say. And this is why the authorities, they refused to move them. And while all this was going on, records also show that his dad Jihad Yeah, his dad's name is Jihad. He'd threatened to kill himself if the rest of his family weren't brought in from Syria. It's not surprising that some authorities expressed concerns that Jihad Hijazi was trying to manipulate the system to get what he wanted, including their housing. You were not told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You weren't told anything approaching the truth by the mainstream media. And in Jihad's holy war statement to the court, Jihad said that he wished he had died in the war with his family, rather than go through what happened at Almanbury Community School. Really? He wished he was dead and all his family were dead rather than go through this school playground instant. Listen to the clip again. Listen to what Bailey's saying. He's asking Jamal repeatedly. What are you saying now? It wasn't a random attack. It wasn't a racist attack. Bailey didn't threaten to stab Jamal. The playground incident was not the beginning of the story. It was a culmination of many events. Not least, it was a response to Jamal's alleged threats to rape Bailey's younger sisters. They're about 9 years old at the time of this. So how's it going at that school when you saw the portrayal of what happened with Bailey and him. Because he was painted as this innocent little kid. Speaker 10: He was an innocent. Speaker 11: He's out Speaker 10: in there for a while. He's out in there. I used to see him bully Bailey's little sisters Speaker 0: and stuff. Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Hope his parents take action. Right? Never mind anything else. What what what what are you producing here with this vermin doing what he's doing here? Speaker 16: That's not Britain. That's not what Speaker 8: we do as a country. Speaker 0: You can hear him there describe Bailey as vermin. Words are important when you're on a daytime platform and and people listen to what you say. What do you do to Vernon? You exterminate. You kill it. Low life, called him a thug. But worst of all, he demanded severe retribution against this child. At the same time as this, Jeremy Vine was reporting. He didn't tell people the bully's name, although he was finding it hard not to name a child. Instead he told his followers where they could find that name. Now this is a direct response of both of your reporting, because when you reported, you can follow the timeline and the repercussions of what that bore. What I've done here, in 2018 there's a charity called Tell Mama that records Muslim hate incidents. Even though they've been in the past penalised for exaggerating the figures, let's go, let's work off their figures. They say there are over a 1,000 hate instances with 325 of them being online. Some of them are Islamophobic, which means criticizing Islam as well. Here, I've printed a piece of paper for each one of those hate incidents. 327 hate incidents online against the entire Muslim community of the UK in 2018. The 325 Islamophobic comments, they're the ones you read about on the news every day. They're the ones people are in jail for. They're the hate incidents the media keeps shoving down your throat. So each piece of paper here represents a hate comment aimed at a child after a playground dispute. I want to read these now, and peers, you demanded severe retribution, that's what you demanded against this child. Let's see if you're happy with some of this. I pray someone rapes you and your whole family while you watch. Fuck your mother. Fuck your love. The Syrians will rape your family. If I saw you, I would rape you to death. You'll be raped by the Volusian group. I hope your mother will not be racist when she is raped. I'm going to bum your nan alive then dead her again. And the threats of rape, all of these threats of rape, imagine being these children, imagine being a 15 year old child living in Huddersfield with your little sisters. Muslim men are jailed in the biggest scandal in the history of our country for mass rapes in that town. And then you're receiving and you're reading these messages. You're going to die, you're going to fucking die, we're going to strangle your mum, your dad, your friends. I'll kill your whole family. I can't wait to find you so I can slit your throat. You're the person who should be killed in those ISIS videos. You, your parents and your whole family have to be burned. Do heaven a favor of fucking off yourself. Looking at you makes me want to commit suicide. Go commit suicide your your oxygen thief. Jump off a bridge bro. Do humans a favor and kill yourself. We don't want you and you don't belong in this world. Again, imagine being that child reading them. Piers. Is that severe enough for you? This is a mental health record for Bailey McLaren. Bailey was referred to Luton CAMS by Luton and Dunstable Psychiatry Liaison on the 31st December 2018. Reason patient involved in incident in Huddersfield and has been relocated to Luton with family. Patient unable to cope with not returning home and has taken an overdose. So this lie, this narrative, this agenda which comes before anything else by the politicians, by the media that was pumped. This child, it doesn't matter. His life didn't matter. You know if he killed himself, no one would have cared. We wouldn't have heard condemnation from any of the politicians or from any of the media. No one cared. Because everyone from start to finish in this story is collateral damage so long as they have the narrative. And peers, you have a son, you have children. Demanding severe retribution against a child for a school playground dispute is unforgivable. You sit there and you preach. You preach against us. You make your accusations against me. Never have I labelled Muslim children as vermin. Never have I demanded my followers to commit severe retribution against anybody. And this is what the media, the politicians, and the celebrities created, aided and abetted by the left wing activism and the selective indignation of Islam. Hypocrites out there might say, who cares? That's what he deserved, right? Imagine for one moment if I had incited violence against young Muslim lad in the reversal of this situation. And you see, in a district where a generation of young girls have been raped, these threats are far from empty. What do you think, if you were working in the school at that time, what do you think what the media done? Speaker 5: I think the media fucking blew out of fucking proportion of what the fucking world body got off. Speaker 0: I know. But in the media run that Jamal was being bullied, Speaker 5: like You see, he used to complain that he used to be bullied. There was a there was another, I think, Kirklees Kirklees guy that came that Jamal that Jamal said somebody bought a knife or something? I think that that be that be that that should be on record. Yeah. Yeah. I don't think when we we we we have to get I think it were a lot of bollocks. Speaker 0: I'm I'm gathering that by reading the school records. They made accusations and then when they're investigated. Speaker 5: Yeah. And there were a lot of bollocks. It lied. Speaker 0: Yeah. Now ITV, Piers Morgan. You used your platform to incite hatred of a young child. No time for facts or the inconvenient truth. Surely you must have known the truth because within a few hours of the story breaking, I was receiving dozens of messages from parents, pupils and staff saying there was much more to the story than met the eye. So I did what any journalist could have done, should have done. I asked questions. Were you just being lazy? Was it willful blindness? Or are you just incompetent peers? And the BBC's Jeremy Vine, to you personally, was it clinical cowardice? After all, you didn't reveal the white boy's name. You just told everyone where to find it on Twitter. Were you afraid of being sued? Although it wouldn't have been the BBC licence fee payers picking up your legal bills, would it? Or was this your Pontius Pilate moment? Condemning a child whilst washing your hands of any responsibility? Because that's what you did and you didn't seek the truth either. Piers, Jeremy, your lazy inept reporting was not without consequence as we will see. You incited hatred, you succeeded. And that's contempt. Your actions, not Bailey's, led to Bailey and his family being driven from their home in the middle of the night. Like the very refugees you claim you care about. The hate you incited was off the scale. Then when machetes had arrived at the school, gangs were roaming the streets looking for bait. West Yorkshire police told Bailey's mum that terrorism threat had been raised to writ. They had intelligence of people coming from Bradford to get Bailey and his family. Rather than deal with the threat, they moved Bailey and his family to a place of safety. So whilst one child had the support of the whole country, had the support of the prime minister, Sajid Javid, the local football club. Everyone rallying behind this child, £160,000 donated to him. The other child in this incident, his family were driven from their home. Fret. Groups of men looking for him, ready to commit violence against him. And the police the police stopped their mom. So the police took the family. The police went and got the family to get them out of their house through imminent danger, and they were taking them to relocate them here. Let's have a look. The night in. This is the accommodation that Bailey's mother with 2 9 year old sisters and children were being relocated to. This one star hotel where rooms are rented by the hour next door to a brothel. The imam who brought a mob of men up to the school, he has 3 mosques within a stone's throw of where we're standing now. Bailey's mother, through her sense, looked up this hotel, saw it was owned by Muslims, read this read the reviews that it's a prostitute racket drug hole, and got out of the police meat wagon with her children to take them to safety herself. But this is where Kirklees Council were housing those children and that family. This is the most Muslim populated area of Leeds. That family were taken to so called safety, yeah, Surrounded by mosques in what is a Muslim ghetto. Yeah? Which is why I'm getting bibbed. I'm gonna get some cause a scene now. We went to see from neighbors what it was like at the time of the incident. Speaker 16: I think it was a a BMW Speaker 15: the fire down the house. Speaker 1: God. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 5: So it was Speaker 16: it was meant to shoot, Speaker 5: the 7 Speaker 0: To shoot the mum? Speaker 16: The mum. The 7 2, to the it's Speaker 0: Well, they come outside and under there. It's shouting and screaming. Shout and screaming. Speaker 10: Well, I Speaker 3: saw the video because the neighbor had shared it. And then I saw in the Yorkshire live, them making Bailey out to be really horrible, and that Jamal was a poor little victim, and it it wound me up. So I commented on it. The victim wasn't a victim. He hit me in the back with a hockey stick. And then within the space of 2 hours, I had about 250 comments saying that I was lying, that I must have been excluded from the school because I'm a liar. Just horrible comments like that. None of them believe in me. Speaker 0: And did you take this did you take the comment down? Speaker 3: Yeah. I didn't want to, but my mom was worried for repercussions, so she asked me to take it down so I did. Speaker 0: This is the area that Kirklees Council thought it was the right place to send a child and his family, who were wanted at the time, the main imam outside their school with mobs of Muslim men looking for them, and this is where they decided to send them. They basically dropped them in their backyard. That's what they were doing. This is the hotel. This is, I believe, a 4 star hotel. It's totally full of illegal immigrants. This is across the country. So the point to make is that illegal immigrants come here, young fine age men, not families, not children, and this is where council would help them. Let's have a look. Hello, boys. Hello. Speaker 5: How are you doing? Speaker 0: Can I do you mind if I ask, what what country are you from, though? Speaker 1: I I do not know speak English. Speaker 0: You do speak English. I do. This is what Speaker 13: country are you from? Mine Speaker 0: yeah. Iran? Yeah. Iran. Okay. Speaker 13: Yeah. Iran. Speaker 0: Kurdistan. Iran. Okay. Nice call, man. I'm just seeing. Is the hotel full? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Full. Enjoying it here? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Nice food. Speaker 0: Nice hotel. Nice food? Speaker 13: Yeah. Healthy food. Speaker 0: Healthy food. It looks like a nice hotel. Yeah. How many people are in here? Speaker 13: I think there's 200. Speaker 0: 200? Lots of children? Speaker 13: So my iPhone, I think it has a little children. Speaker 0: No children? Speaker 13: Oh, my mom's children. No. Speaker 0: Not many children. But it's a nice hotel. Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Speaker 0: Nice hotel. It is a nice hotel. And if if you look at if you look at where the other family were being housed in Beeston and you compare it to this 4 star 4 star hotel, nice food as our friend says. Speaker 1: Healthy food. Speaker 0: Healthy food. Speaker 11: Yeah. Alright. Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Hi. How you doing? Speaker 1: Hey. Do you want to come back in? Speaker 0: Yeah. We're off now, mate. We're only we're only we're only we're done now. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 11: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you know what they have in here? They have a full time doctor and nurses. Full time, stationed in there. Speaker 13: In, buddy. Speaker 0: Full time. So you know when you come my dad tried to get a doctor's appointment earlier. Couldn't get one. Full time. Full time. Full time. Speaker 1: You're very bad. Speaker 0: The food's bad? Yeah. The food's bad? Yeah. Is it free? Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's free. Speaker 5: They called our school. Soon as the media media and all that died, they sent in chief inspectors chief inspectors of fucking off state. We knew they're gonna fail and every fucking thing they can think of. Speaker 1: I have goofiness, There's a lot more changes. All of that and yesterday. And, you know, they're only in the bank, but it was never picked up. Speaker 0: Apart from my reporting, there was not a single media statement given the other side of this story. The staff knew. Other pupils knew. They could've exposed the lie. Why didn't they? Speaker 1: The incident I always quote the incident. Yeah. The incident has reoccurred. It's come to my door. They said you can't talk about it because you've got an undistclosure agreement. They're not satisfactory. So that was the reason they triggered it. Speaker 0: They were even not free to tell you the truth or they were terrified of the consequences. And that's for so called journalists. Some can't find the truth, some won't tell the truth, and some they're afraid of the truth. But me, as a journalist, it's my job to present you the truth. Speaker 1: If you want my honest opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shoot that school. Get up there and get rid of this. Speaker 0: You see, when the media and politicians decide to kill a story, when they decide to hide the truth from you, they'll do whatever it takes. They shut down the school. It's gone. Everyone lost their jobs. You see, once this Live Our Racist attack had gone global, the truth would never be allowed to come out. The real truth, that a young Syrian refugee was struggling to fit into his new environment was problematic. His allegedly abusive and violent conduct towards teachers and children was allowed to run unchecked. Why? Did the school authorities turn a blind eye rather than be accused of victimizing the boy, of being racist towards him? They stayed silent. The truth may have triggered accusations of racism or sparked discussion about immigration policies. The challenges of achieving the successful integration of migrants we welcome into United Kingdom, and the need to take those challenges seriously. You see, Jamal was one of 20,000 Syrian refugees who come to the UK as part of the United Nations resettlement program. The government could not allow their policies to be examined and the consequences and their incompetence to be exposed. And if you don't think the government is incompetent, you ain't been paying attention to anything. Priti Patel's been talking tough, really tough on controlling our borders for years. And yet we have boatloads of illegal economic migrants being escorted across the English Channel and put into these luxury accommodation at your expense. This ineptitude does nothing for the refugees who come here legally, who we welcome into England, refugees who are trying to integrate and make a new life here. And who was the community's rage directed at? All Syrian refugees. That's who. When in fact, there are many families of Syrian refugees in the area, we're told, all of them delightful, working hard to settle and integrate into the country they can now call home. I spoke to multiple refugee families. In the school, Gremlin, my children. No. Any Gremlin. No problems with your children? No. That's it. And you've had a you've had a good experience in the school? Speaker 10: I used to have 2 friends and they don't Bali and they don't care where from country I can't move anything. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 10: And when I spoke English, like, I was we was about 1 month we've been in here, and I used to not speak English very much. So they used to tell me how to speak all that thing. And now I'm in year 8, and I know how to speak English. And I made more friends, and now I am fine. Speaker 0: And you're fine? And then no problems? Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules. Speaker 0: Who told Jamal to go on camera and say this? Who arranged the media tour? Who encouraged him to take legal action? He was originally going to sue the school for not looking after him and then decided to sue me instead. Who told him to put this in his statement to the High Court? You see, Jamal doesn't like to break the school rules. Here's the problem. This is his behavior record. Almost a 100 codes for bad behavior. Truancy, verbal abuse to teachers, physical violence towards pupils, and lying. Yeah, there's plenty for lying. You see, I haven't got all of Jamal's school records. Large sections of documents I was given were blacked out. We tried to get access but we weren't allowed. And the lawyers wrote to the court to explain they had misplaced documentation. And finally, as you can hear, the lawyers decided what they were gonna allow me to see. Whilst I was preparing my defense, Jamal's lawyers decided what I could see. And this global news story wasn't an accident. It was all carefully planned. You see, the day before the video went viral, a GoFundMe page was set up for Jamal and the video went viral the day after a criminal record check come back on Jamal. Why would his lawyers do a criminal record check? Well, they had to make sure this was financially beneficial exercise. Wasn't going to be derailed by an unhelpful pass. 15 Rold Jamal, his record was clean by the way. Mohammed Akanji, the jihadist lawyer of choice, was immediately on the global media blitz. Speaker 19: Listen. I'm very conned to himself. I'm after him for my own reason. Speaker 8: Right. Okay. Nothing sinister though, is it? Speaker 19: Oh, fuck. No. No. Journalistic. Oh, journalistic. Well, that's good. Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No. Speaker 19: No. Fucking totally journalistic. I wanna get all the background on him. You reckon he Yeah. You reckon he was a member of that? Speaker 0: Yeah. Al and Midrgharun are a prescribed terrorist organization. Almost 60% of terrorists in British prisons are ex members of this organization. They kill. They murder. They slaughter. That is the organization that Mohammed Khanji and his brother were allegedly, according to this, top mainstream Muslim British journalist who are members of it. How does a Syrian lad find himself working with the jihadist lawyer of choice before this video even went out? Before anyone has seen this viral video. Within 2 weeks, the lawyers have been made the beneficiaries of the GoFundMe page of £160,000. A plan to sue the school? That's put on hold. And a plan to sue, moi, for libel was launched. What riches had these lawyers promised Jamal and his family? School records were edited. Migration Yorkshire clamored to make this playground fight about race and hate. They contacted the Home Office as soon as they heard about this playground fight. Yeah. The home office, a playground scuffle. Why are they contacting the home office instantly? Someone went further. You see, we had this school incident report analyzed by a graphologist. Someone who analyzes handwriting. It appears to show that a second person with very different handwriting doctored the report to allege that Bailey had threatened to stab Jamal. Even though all the witness reports mentioned there was only one teacher there, so only one teacher could have done an instant report. So, with the careful planning, the jihadist favorite lawyer and the enthusiastic support of some useful idiots, it was possible for the lies to go round the world twice before the truth had had a chance to put his pants on. I now need to mention other repercussions of what happened in Ormondbury. I was being sued for reporting the things that were said to me about Jamau. I had to defend myself. The judges already already ruled that I was not allowed to argue. It was in the public's interest for people to hear a different perspective of Jamal. I had to prove that the information reported to me was true. That's not the kind of burden placed on Piers Morgan or Jeremy Vine. Piers can describe Bailey as vermin without being held to account. And who is behind propagating this deception and the lawsuit against me? You see, this is where we get to meet the most sinister part of the unholy alliance. All sorts of people are helping out, but leading the posse from the front is the jihadist lawyer of choice. He represented Shamina Begman, you know the jihadi terrorist that's out in Syria. He represented, I think, Michael Adeballajo, Lee Rigby's killer. I think he's even had to change his name because he's got such a terrible track record. So this is the lawyer who's suing me and who the media celebrated that he had served me papers even though I wasn't in the country. If you're pillaged, if you've plundered, if you've raped and you're beheaded, and you say you've done it in the name of Islam, well these are the lawyers for you. The lawyers who stepped forward for ISIS by Shmina Begum, who've been fighting to get her back into our country. Who defended Michael Adeballaju who beheaded Lee Rigby. This is Mohammed Akanji and his colleague, Faruk Bajwa, who's been banned from claiming legal aid. Yeah. Banned from claiming legal aid for putting in fraudulent expense claims. Let me rewind a bit. Let's go back a few weeks. There's an important piece of background information to this. Speaker 15: Don't know the full ins and outs of it, but, basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yep. To be honest, I kind of haven't, and Antifa Dundee. The base he says are planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson, because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens, make ketchup bombs and stuff. And allegedly, instead, wherever the foot, these petrol bonds through your door when he sleeps. They say they're also friends with a few MPs. Speaker 0: Now at the heightened tensions with multiple osmond warnings, they now take back the radar phone, the one option we have to go direct to the police, and they are removing it at this current moment. Speaker 1: Where are you from? I'm from Speaker 0: So, look, what did you just say, basically, the the the radar phone or whatever it is? Yes. Yes. The phone, the emergency phone that you Will will be taking that back. You'll be taking that back. Yeah. But those those phones are They're used for a aren't even for real. Like, so so when there's a heightened threat and people have come to the house and the address has been put out where my kids are, you're then gonna take the panic phone back. It's Christmas 2018. The police come to my family's home to tell me that people in Antifa, file a violent and extremist organisation, are planning to kill me and my family. See who were the first to comment on this video? Well, Mohammed Akanji of Farooq Bazrunko, of course, the jihadists lawyers of choice, but also Mike Stoodsbury, an independent journalist, an Antifa activist. So the jihadist lawyers knew Antifa were planning to kill me, then actually commented on the video of the Ozmen warning. You see, what happened next is interesting, although not interesting to the solicitors regulation authority or the law society. The people who should be interested in the integrity of our lawyers. Speaker 16: It will be live streamed. I'm not in charge of the Speaker 4: filming or anything like that. Speaker 16: That's, down to the Speaker 4: the guys over here. Speaker 16: And you literally know we wanted to do this, so we thought, what mug can we probably do with a creep for this? Speaker 0: So 2 lawyers who know Antifa are planning to kill me seek out an Antifa extremist, hire him for one day, just one day, and send him to live stream the servant of papers to my home, my family's home. Papers which had already been served by the way, with a gang. When my wife and children were there, when they knew I was abroad, lawyers commissioned the Antifa Extremist to broadcast my home address in order, as they put it, to cause a spectacle. Speaker 18: The law firm or the lawyer who has been, you know, sort of taking the lead on the Tommy case wanted to make sure, doubly sure that that, a, Tommy got the, the the letter. It actually went out 2 2 two different ways, and he wanted to make a bit of a spectacle out of it. This this is all very they're very amusing. Speaker 0: A group supported by Mike Stitchbury came to the home that my wife and children were in on a Sunday afternoon when I wasn't even in the country. So let's have a look at Mike Stitchbury, who calls himself a journalist, who promoted this event, who shared it and encouraged it, who found it amusing that my wife was so scared she had to ring the police. My wife has been sat down and told in her home that Antifa are planning to kill her. They're planning to kill our family and harm our family. She's been told that she may get acid in her face. Well, how do you think she felt on a Sunday afternoon whilst my children are playing outside on their bikes? To be told that Antifa were on their way to our home. Let's have a look at Mike Stuxbury, the man that sent them. Here he is self admitting that he is part of Antifa. Here he is promoting violence against his opposition. Punch them, punch them, punch them. Here he is hoping that buses full of Antifa get shipped in to smash people's skulls in. Here he is calling for white genocide. Mike Stitchby is an extremist. He's a far left extremist who currently is playing a victim. He encouraged people to come and he sent people and was part of an organization that communicated together, to send people to the home where my wife and children were when I wasn't there. He even crowdfunded to support them in their action. Speaker 18: He, you know, he was looking at various people and eventually he sort of came on to Dick Coughlin. Dick Coughlin? I can't say it properly. Who is a a a YouTuber who has made videos about Tommy for, god, almost 10 years, I think, who's a who's a real critic. He's a I don't know if you've checked him out, but he's a he's a funny guy. Speaker 5: Check out. Yeah. Speaker 18: He's, sort of, you know, got red hair, x he calls you know, he's he's an ex crackhead, basically. Speaker 0: And who is this antique extremist hired to come to my kids' home? Keep watching. I went up to where and they said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it. And later that night, the Antifa Extremists hired by their lawyers had a message for me and my children. Speaker 16: And on that note, see, Speaker 0: on that on the happy note. Speaker 6: Oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate. Speaker 0: So look at the man that they sent. The man that you can see, the Muslim lawyer, handed privileged documentation giving this man my children's home address. That's what he's done. Fully aware of the serious danger my family are in, and he hands them my children's address. They then come to my children's home, my wife gets a phone call, my children run off the drive, they lock themselves in the house, they ring emergency, the emergency 999 call for the police to come, they press panic buttons, they need support because Antifa are coming. They came, they told the Muslim lawyer, he's fully aware they're coming to live stream where my family are. They live stream and dox the name of the road. They dox the door number. I went up to where and I'm and I said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it. The man's specifically chosen. He was chosen. He says in his own video. Speaker 16: The lawyer in this case was a guy called Mohammed Sunimi Akundra who works for a solicitors in London called, I shit you not, Farooq Bajwa and Co, solicitors of London. I get asked by this guy that, they've decided that they're going to Tommy Robinson is going to be served legal papers, so he can be sued by this family. And they asked, me, do I want to be the one to go along to serve legal documents? Speaker 0: Let's have a look at who Dick Coughlin is. Let's have a look at some of the things he said. Here he is promoting hatred against black people. Serious, this is a crime. The comments he makes are a crime. Here he is promoting hatred against Pakistanis. Here he is singing a song promoting anti semitism, singing a song about lampshades being made out of Jewish people's skin from the hollow. Yeah. 3rd black, 3rd black, you're a good killer kite. We're white, far right, and we're gonna have a fight. We're in the A self confessed racist anti semitic crackhead was sent to my children's property. He talked about raping my wife in her skull socket. He talked about my children being fed for a meat winder. He talked about burning my house down and whilst masturbating with my family in it. Now other than to terrorize my wife and children, why would any sane person do this? It worked, okay. Tipped off by a friend who saw the gang on livestream approaching, my ex wife hit the panic button and barricaded herself and our children in a bedroom. The police thankfully responded in time. And these are exactly the same tactics being used against the unbelievably courageous children in Ombre. Threats of violence and rape against children who are willing to stand with me in defence of the truth at the High Court of London. The video release, media, GoFundMe, Antifa, it all happened at the same time. It was coordinated, and it was about hate and making money. And how that far left activist, who appears to be an antisemitic, Jew hating, black hating racist, came to my home with his gang and threatened to kill my children. These lawyers, the mainstream media, they don't care about refugees. They don't care about Jamelle. They don't care about the truth. Say that bloke who made the video saying Speaker 1: he's gonna kill the kids. Yeah. Speaker 0: Can you if you didn't do it, I know 100% give a statement. I know. I was there. Speaker 5: Okay. Give a Speaker 0: statement about that. She complained about it. She contacted Paul, remember, it would have been the liaison officer at the time, to Okay. Ask if he was arrested. I found out his address, and I gave you all the information for him. So even now Right. Say now, looking at that, can he be arrested now then? Speaker 15: I don't know what happened with Speaker 20: the previous report because when we search on our system that we currently use Speaker 0: You probably got very good. Speaker 20: See any crime report that was linked to it. Speaker 0: You see, the next day, knowing I've been provoked with threats against my ex wife and my children, no doubt thinking they would catch me conspiring to commit violence and lock me up on a conspiracy charge. Here, outside my ex wife's house, men in a car that has never been registered, check the registration plate. So presumably from the security services, we've listing devices recording what's being said in my home. The involvement of the security services may explain why Dick Coughlin, the man who publicly threatened to murder my children, has never even been spoken to or arrested despite my wife's complaints. What are you doing? Is there any reason the back of your glove? There's no Speaker 5: one in the back of your glove. Speaker 0: So what are you doing? We're not here. Anything to do with you. What are you doing now? Well, who what do you think we're doing? I think you're starting to do me. Speaker 15: No. No. It's a pissy. Speaker 0: Who's this with? What are you doing? And there is someone in the back. I'm at Speaker 11: Can you Speaker 1: tell me what you're doing now? Speaker 0: Because essentially, I've got threats against me. I'm not. Yeah? So what are you doing? I don't know what you're doing, bro. That's all everyone knows what you're doing. I've got police officers sat with a recording in a recording van. In the back of this van is a recording station. I'm not standing. You're not going. No. Because I no. Because what yous are doing I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. They're sat in the back of their van. This is recording devices. The whole of this back thing because he just opened up when I got him out. The whole of this back thing is recording where they're pointing it because they what this is has been a setup. These people are set these police officers are setting me Speaker 1: up. Speaker 0: They're setting me up. It's a setup. They're setting me up by sending people to my house because they think I'm gonna react and do something, and they're recording it with listening devices. We checked the vehicle registration plate outside the house on the government website and there's no such vehicle. Let's not forget the politicians are fearless leaders. It was only when I went alone to the home of self declared journalist, Mike Stuchby, to ask him why he had done what he had and why he thought it was funny to intimidate my children. Some of you may some of you may have seen that people have been outside my home. Timberland, my family. The difference is when they come to my home, 5 men come to my home. I'm on my own. I've had to move my children who are scared and upset. And people encouraged people to participate in coming to my address. One of those such people Speaker 13: who Speaker 0: It was only then that the fearless then deputy leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson, steps forwards. Ignoring reality completely. Speaker 21: Every major social media platform other than YouTube has taken down Steven Yaxley Lennon's profile because of his hateful conduct. Late on Monday night, Yaxley Lennon turned up at a journalist home banging on the doors and windows demanding to be let in. And after being escorted away by the police, he returned at 5 AM and continued his intimidation. The incident was live streamed. He later warned journalists in a YouTube video to expect a knock at the door. Does the secretary of state think that is right that YouTube and the parent company Alphabet continues to give this man a platform, sir? Speaker 0: It'd be funny, you know, if it wasn't so insidious. The hardly honorable mister Watson totally misrepresented what happened, and from behind his shield of parliamentary privilege, bravely declared but I've been terrorizing a journalist. Journalist. Stokesbury's an antifa activist who incites violence and wants to kill white people. Terrorizing. Was I terrorizing? Mister Watson bravely demanded that I'd be removed from YouTube. YouTube had now had only recently confirmed that none, not one of my videos had broken any of their stringent guidelines. And my videos hadn't broken any laws. It was clear I hadn't harassed anyone, certainly not Mike Stutchbury, if indeed he is a journalist. But none of that mattered. My wife and children left their family home that night. They never went back. Perhaps having their lives endangered by their jihadist lawyers. See my wife started legal action against Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra's firm. But Mo and Co, Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra, see they weren't so keen on facing the law as they were on abusing the law to persecute others for financial and ideological reasons. On the 31st March 2019, they promptly collapsed their law firm. They'd never be involved in the case. That's what they said. And doctor Farooq Basra, well he's no longer gonna be a lawyer. He'd been living in Pakistan. That's it. That's what they said. That's how easy it was for Mo and Co to escape justice. Interestingly, they're still signing documents on the case on the 6th June, months after saying they're not involved. Several other law firms have reported them to the Law Society, the body that is supposed to make sure lawyers behave ethically. Nothing's been done. I wonder why. In fact, all the lawyers working at Fruit Basement and Co just moved across to a new law firm called Burlington's. And guess what? Yeah. Burlington's took on Jamelle's case against me. FruitBazwa now works for Burlington's. FruitBazwa's son now works for Burlington's. Fruit Basra is Burlington's GDPR expert. Pretty ironic, no? Fruit Basra and Co leaked my children's address to an antifa activist to put it online for everyone. And if we've been stupid enough to expect more ethical behaviour from Birlingtons than from Faruk Bajwa and Mohammed Akanji, well, we'd have been disappointed. I just really, which I've been trying to do, I need all of the disclosure, which I haven't had. I haven't had a full disclosure of his school records. Speaker 12: Therefore, to make sure, that we have it, that that some documents haven't been lost in the transfer of the bathroom through Bourgeois to to Burlington's, we have done another subject access request to the council for Speaker 0: July. And how long would that and how long would the council take for that? Speaker 12: I I don't know. I I don't think they gave us time frame, did they, Speaker 11: Luke? No. No. Speaker 15: They didn't, unfortunately. So you're asking Speaker 0: so what what you're saying is you believe there may be things that I that I haven't been disclosed. You don't know how long they're gonna take, but you won't agree to an adjournment? Speaker 12: No. No. Our position is that we're not agreeing to an adjournment. Those are my instructions. Speaker 0: Because my my my concern and serious concern is the safety of the witnesses. And and it's a genuine and and if you I don't believe for 1 minute that Mohammed al Khemji or Farooq Basra give a shit about any of this or Jamelle. Yeah. I I generally don't think they do. And this is I'm Speaker 12: just gonna say Farooq Bajwa and Mohammed Dukunji have nothing to do with this case. This is my case. Speaker 0: How how how come how come how come then Speaker 12: to anybody from Fruit Bajwa Speaker 0: How come then Fruit Bajwa Speaker 12: have Burlington started with me. Speaker 0: How come Fritbajwa signed a form 3 months after he left then to do this case? Speaker 12: It's absolute it was, if if that was the case, it was before I gave the undertaking, and he wasn't involved in this case before. Speaker 0: He signed a he signed a form dated June in June. He signed a form, and the date on that form that he signed is June. He left this case in March, apparently. How come? Speaker 12: Well, I I I if you explanation as to why. I'm not quite sure what the formula is about. Speaker 0: No. You'll see it you'll see it you'll see it on my documentary. Okay so when you when you send me what you decide is relevant yeah, how am I going to know what you've cut out? Speaker 15: Well I suppose you wouldn't. Speaker 0: I wouldn't. Does that seem fair? If the info if the if the information is not relevant, then what harm could it do in me hacking it? Speaker 15: But it's not about harm Stephen, it's about privacy. Speaker 0: For the last for the last 3 days, since I gave you, since you received videos so that you become aware that I have video evidence that's going to prove my case, since that point my ex wife and my children for the last 2 days have had police at their house because they've been receiving threats. On top of that pictures of my ex wife have been put online by the same people who were in bed with Mohammed Okanji. Then 2 days ago Mohammed Okanji doxxed my mother and father's house. Last night, that house at 1 o'clock in the morning was smashed to pieces with bricks through the windows, yeah? This is all going on in the background of it. I've been trying to get my stuff ready, but just so you're aware of what's going on as to why I don't trust the words you say. When you have Farouk Basra's son working for your, working for your company and Farooq Basra is the man that sent people to threaten to kill my children, I'm wondering why in the last 48 hours or last 72 hours, since I disclosed information to you, Why why my family and loved ones have come under persecuted harm? Of which is all detailed with police records and video footage of everything that's been going on. So I'm super concerned and don't trust you or your party to decide what's relevant in this case. I don't trust you. So where, how, if this should be fair trial about getting out the truth, if that's what you're working for, you need to give me your disclosure. Instead of reviewing it and taking bits out, which is what you've already done with the school records. You'll say, because I know that's not the full school records, so and you've covered up things which, and Luke, Francesca told me, I have a recording of her telling me, that your, that Burlington's did not retract anything, redact anything, yet in court you had to admit you did. I've got the recording of that telling you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. And then in court you sit and admit that you have been redacting things. So, forgive me. It's just lie after lie. This is Burlington's lawyers losing documents that they're supposed to send to me and deleting things that they don't want me to see? Misplaced. How do you misplace documents that were electronically filed on their case management system through Basra and Co, then passed over to Berlin's? All of this is because they're sharing it. And all of this is to put pressure on me in the weeks before it. And all this, and this is a kanji, I guarantee you this is a kanji, a kanji working with resistant hay. The the account that's put put it on is is resisting hate, yeah? Resistant hate who a country hires with Dick Coughlin to send to the house before. They're like his little minis. So now he knows that it's coming, it's going to land on his lap. The whole lie that they've told, and this is the actions they use. They can't play the man so they play the kids and the family. You don't need to be scared, Sanya, because, they're doing this Speaker 10: you guys just told me he's a good boy. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know, babe. But they're purposely just doing that. But when they're doing this, they're just doing this to try and get cause me shit and make you worry. So I know it's easier said, but you don't need to worry. Yeah? They're doing this so they're doing this so that I don't beat them in court. That's why they're doing this. Yeah? The mad thing is the whole time this goes on, the media and all of the, we're the bad guys. That we've been on. But like I'm the one persecuting people or targeting them. And they're such cowards. They're such cowards, man. I just got a phone call, and they said goodbye. I'm so scared. I've told the police, but I'm so scared. Speaker 10: Yeah. Hello? Speaker 0: Jenna, who's just wrong with Spencer? Speaker 10: We don't know at the minute. Speaker 11: What are Speaker 0: the police then? Speaker 10: I'm just making a statement. Speaker 0: Okay. But just quickly, what are they what are they are they getting that account? Let's put a picture of you online. How who's who showed you that picture, Jenna? Speaker 10: It's on Twitter. Yeah. Speaker 1: Who saw it? Speaker 10: I saw it myself. Speaker 0: You saw it yourself. Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna are the police sorting out to get rid of it? Speaker 10: Yeah, they've taken the address of the Twitter person to put it out. Speaker 0: If you can say I give them 50 addresses of people who have done exactly this over the years, including the redhead man who what about the redhead bloke who friends come to kids? What do they say about that? Speaker 10: Well nothing really. Speaker 0: No? It's a crime. Do you know what I mean? If I make if I make a video threatening to kill some kids, I'll be arrested. So that the point where you need to ask them specifically and say to them you made a complaint, someone threatened to murder your children, you had to leave your home yeah, Those threats have now followed you to where you're now living. Yeah. And they're coming from the same people, the same organizations, the same people they done fuck all about last time. They didn't lick them. They didn't speak to them. They didn't. The solicitor is still acting with impunity, doing it to my mom and dad yesterday. See, you need to specifically ask them, then I want our answer, Adam. When you made a complaint against Richard Coughlin, Dick Coughlin last year, why have they not done anything? And give us and get you a follow-up and an answer as to why they haven't Speaker 15: done anything, if you can. Speaker 11: Just get Speaker 12: it up. You've got time? Speaker 0: I mean, the kids are right. Am I right that you managed to track the number? Yes. So you know who made those phone calls to her and the Speaker 14: We know where the number it came from Speaker 5: Yep. Speaker 14: And who who that phone was registered to. So that's all obviously, we cannot prove well, I I at that time, I wasn't able to prove who. I only could say where the number came from. Speaker 0: As in as in as in whose phone is? Speaker 14: Who the phone is registered to. Speaker 0: Yeah. Because because, obviously, for me, this was this was threatening phone calls a week before a high court trial trying to prevent the court trying to prevent the court to justice. How come no one's been arrested? Speaker 14: I can't see any again on the crime report. Speaker 0: If I send you evidence, which I'm going to anyway because it's all going to the judge, if I send you evidence of Mohammed Akanji doxing my mum and dad's address, if I send you evidence of criminal damage and attacks in the middle of the night at an old pensioner's old pensioner's home, and I show you evidence of pictures of my wife being put on, ex wife being put online, and my son. They've hung my 11 year old son's phone. The police were all involved. They've been threatening my 11 year old son. Yeah? This is what's going on. If I send you evidence of that, do you think you'll support an anonymity order to protect the children in this case? Speaker 15: Steven, I I I can't answer that because I don't have instructions to answer that. I don't have conduct of the matter. But what I can clarify for you is some of the issues that I can give answers on. One of those of which I heard you made reference to, Farooq's son working. He is not involved in the case in any way at all, has no access to any files whatsoever. Speaker 0: You've heard how Luke hack here. He couldn't explain why they were adapting and deleting information from documents before handing them over to me. Information I should have been given. He couldn't answer the simple question, who decides what's relevant? Unfortunately, in terms of integrity, bowlands don't appear to be any better than Fruit Bajwa and Mohammed al Kanchi. You see, I was told he'd violently attacked a girl. I was told he'd attack someone as part of a gang. And I was told he'd threaten to stab someone. In fact, Jamal would violently attack more than 1 girl and we presented the evidence to the court, including the testimony of courageous children who came to court. These children weren't Tommy Robinson fans, but they came to the high court to speak the truth. So let me just look at one of the pupils that come to court and testified. This young girl wasn't a supporter of mine, didn't support my politics, but she still came to court and testified. Let me have a look at her school record and read what her teacher says about her. Charlie is a very mature and hardworking member of the form. She has been an absolute pleasure to have in the form. She has represented the form in the school council and in various events across the school throughout the school year. She represents all that is positive and exciting about studying studying at Almunbury. Charlie is now currently studying law at university. Why would this girl lie, randomly lie, before I was involved? Why would she then travel to the high court of London and commit perjury? Speaker 11: Because Speaker 0: that is what the judge has found, that she's made it all up. And Jamal, the Syrian refugee, the one with multiple lies in his school records and behavioral discipline reads everywhere, well, he was telling the truth. That is what he found in this case. Why would a mother post images and send me those images of her daughter being black and blue? Why? For what reason? Why would the staff lie? Why would the head teacher lie? Why would every single person who was recorded covertly lie about what Jamal was like. 12 different people lying about what Jamal was like. Why? See, the judge has really helped us out here. The judge says people can lie for reasons that make no sense. Sometimes for no reason at all. He could not readily identify any explanation for why some of these people were prepared to do so and lie. He concludes the alleged assaults, they never happened at all. Despite Jamal's school record, which you've seen, the judge states the Cayman's record is overwhelmingly positive. He acknowledged Jamal has a record of lying, but decides on this occasion, it is Jamal who's telling the truth and everyone else, everyone else is lying. Really? We waited 10 weeks for this? That's your conclusion? That's the logic from the highest liable judge in our land? There was no jury. That's right. There's no jury. All of these people were lying, But Jamal, he was telling the truth. Jamal, who could only find his dad Jihad to speak for him. Not a single teacher. Not a classmate, not a friend, not a neighbor, or a support worker came to court to support Jamal's version of defense. Jamal, who said he only broke the rules a few times at school and even then it weren't his fault. His school records suggest something very different. I wanna be clear and fair to Jamal. He denies every accusation against him, completely and utterly. On the day the 5 courageous children appeared in the dock, giving testimony against Jamal. Jamal didn't even show up in court that day to face his accusers. Neither did the press. The press actually left court when the witnesses stood up to give their evidence in my defense. It's alarming to think we have this kind of intellect at the top of our judiciary. The story of these 2 children is actually a story about free speech or the death of it. It's a story about how the mainstream media is more interested in pushing an agenda than giving you balance and truth. How it continues despite Levenson to act with impunity. Is the media held to account for what they report? Have Pierce Morgan or Jeremy Vine been held to account? No. It's a story about how the the law is being manipulated and exploited by the far left and Islamists to destroy the lives of anyone who speaks out against the accepted so called progressive, so called liberal narrative. Or about the poisonous influence of Islam's Sharia law in our society. Is the law fit for purpose? No. And it's a story about our government and judiciary's disdain for free speech and the truth, and the lengths that they will go to in order to silence dissent, especially with its new and increasing powers. Is our government being held accountable for its actions? No. Is the judiciary independent of political influence? You've seen all the evidence. You decide. Whether you agree in my politics is irrelevant. When dissent is crushed, free speech dies and governments move one step closer to tyranny. The lawyers know the truth. Even Jamal's father Jihad, he knows the truth about his son. They all knew the truth and were using Jamal to further their agenda, regardless of the consequences for Jamal. They continued to pursue the case, which incidentally, has caused my divorce and bankruptcy. My ex wife had to choose between her marriage to me, and the safety of our children. I'm glad she chose our children. We're still best mates. You see, Jamal's lawyers told me very early on, if I apologized and paid them 50 grand, they'd drop their case. If you're watching this, you know the decision I made. I might apologize for reporting what I was told, for what I believed to be true, for standing up for Bailey, a young lad unjustly vilified by pretty much everyone. But in silence and dissent, are the media and our government any different to the governments they criticize so much? China, Russia, Iran. Immigration, COVID, Brexit, if it doesn't fit the narrative, you will not hear the alternative view. And where else have we seen this? Where else has the media, politicians, police, and social services hidden for truth for decades, fearful of being called racist, grooming gangs. That's where a cover up of such horrific cost to 1,000 of young girls in towns and cities across our country. And nowhere worse than under the stewardship of counselor Shabir Pandor's Kirklees Council. You see, hiding the truth doesn't protect communication. It does the total opposite. It undermines trust in public institutions. It stokes resentment and conflict in our communities. Tragically, those who lead us don't seem to have the moral clarity or courage to speak the truth. They cause the division that they're trying to prevent. People ask me, was it worth it? Yeah. It was worth it. The truth is always worth defending. I'm still here. If you were born in the United Kingdom, you've already won the lottery your life. An inheritance from our parents and grandparents of freedom, equality under English law, and democracy. If we allow ourselves to be silenced, that inheritance is rendered worthless. What legacy will we leave for the children and grandchildren who come after us? None of us can afford to let free speech die. We cannot and we will not be silenced. So you've seen. I'm being sent to jail. I'm being prosecuted for showing you the truth. Nothing else. I didn't lie. Okay? They've lied, continually lied. Now for the attorney general to bring a charge against a member of the public for contempt to court, it has to be in the public interest. I say to the attorney general, this is not the police prosecuting. In fact, the claimant in this case is not asking me to to be prosecuted. His lawyers are not asking me to be prosecuted. The Labour government's attorney general is the one attempting to send me to jail. Now for it to be in the public's interest you remember the public. You've just watched this expose. Is it in your interest to lock me up for 2 years? How can it be? Let the government know. Let the attorney general know by signing the petition at www.truthontrial.co.uk to let them know you don't support the imprisonment of journalists for reporting facts to you, the British public. Who knows what the future now holds for me? The one thing that gives me a peace of mind if I'm in prison or if even if the worst happens is knowing that my family have stability and have security. If you can support them during these times, the link is at www.helptommy.com. I really appreciate your support.