reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 2, 2024 at 7:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fauci's involvement in the censorship of a pre-print that questioned the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 is discussed. The connection between Bill Gallaher, a virologist, and Fauci is explored, suggesting that Gallaher may have been approached by Fauci to spin narratives. The presence of HIV-like inserts in the SARS-CoV-2 genome and the significance of the Furin cleavage site are highlighted. The posts also mention the DEFUSE proposal, early treatment debates, and the potential implications of COVID's origin. The inventor of fusion inhibitors, which have shown effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2, is mentioned. Congress is urged to support an investigation into the origin of COVID-19.

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

An origin tweetorial [cont] The best-laid scams of vice & spin II: The Spike is starkly full of errors [1] The other question we must ask ourselves is Why? Why the censorship? Why the FCS silence? Why nuke an Indian pre-print? This thread is about that https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359855384_The_Myth_of_the_Blind_Watchmaker

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

[2] To understand the smothering of Pradhan et al, a 1/30/20 pre-print that called attention to suspiciously HlV-like inserts within the SARS-CoV-2 genome, we must first realize that someone else had already recognized that homology @DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

[1] It's time to go back to the future, @tony_vandongen! Back to when Bill Gallaher first described the structure of the SARS-CoV spike on May 2nd, 2003. And what did he want to discuss first?.... @DeinertDoc @Daoyu15 @JikkyKjj @ydeigin @DrKevinWMcCair1

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks [3] I posit that Fauci knew how dangerously infectious nCoV-2019 had the potential to be BEFORE China ever admitted that it was spreading H2H. I further posit that Gallaher was Fauci's MRPA [Most Recent Proximal Antecedent] - the 1st person he approached to spin narratives

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks [4] Bill Gallaher finished his 80-pg book about the SARS-CoV-2 genome on 1/29/20 [publ. 1/31], & discussed the FCS before anyone else in the Western hemis. How did a retired 75-yr old virologist write a book 9 days after human-2-human spread was announced? https://virological.org/t/analysis-of-wuhan-coronavirus-deja-vu/357/4

Analysis of Wuhan Coronavirus: Deja Vu I am preparing a 16,000 or so word analysis covering the outbreak and comparing several viral proteins of SARS and nCoV2019, in monograph form, to be published on Amazon Kindle within a few days. I would note here two n… virological.org

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks [5] Gallaher was a pioneer in early HlV research, having elucidated the structure of its spike. Later, he did the same with the SARS spike in 2003, with his jr. lab partner- R. Garry This was the subject of @jjcouey's stream [link at top of this article] https://prometheusshrugged.substack.com/p/theblindwatchmaker?r=ep9dv&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Part V: The Myth of the Blind Watchmaker Gaslight of the Gods, part V prometheusshrugged.substack.com

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey [6] Garry was an attendee of the 2/1 meeting, as well as 1/5 authors of "Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," the article always cited by Fauci as 'proof' or 'evidence' of a scientific 'consensus' that the pandemic virus was natural Garry was also the author most AGAINST a nat. origin https://t.co/q8ChRImz0o

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey [7] Why would Garry privately disagree with his own mentor's assessment that SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin? 1 poss expl is that Fauci had privately reached out to Gallaher before calling the 2/1 meeting. That would've given Gallaher enough time to write a lab-origin-debunking📔

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey [8] What's the point? What does this have to do with the FCS? What does this have to do with an Indian pre-print being pulled on 2/2/20? Everything - they're all connected. The last 4 proteins of the 4th HlV insert are PRRA/[R], the Furin cleavage site @chrismartenson @TyCardon https://t.co/F8l3fPwR5Q

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon [9] But wait-there's more The inserts & FCS also tie into: the DEFUSE proposal the P. Veritas/Major Murphy the 19nt Mod. sequence the early treatment debacle the Biden Report @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [10] The censorship began with T. Bedford working the bioRxiv retraction of Pradhan et al. Days later, K. Andersen joined the BioRxiv editorial crew. Remember, Fauci knew about EHA's GOF issues by 1/27/20 He's also led NIH HIV efforts since they began. He knew what these meant: https://t.co/8NYHPSkTcE

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [11] It wasn't ONE thing that made it clear that SARS-CoV-2's origin wasn't natural It was MANY [#1] What did this tell Fauci et al about COVID's origin? [#2] THESE are the things that they KNEW when making their decisions about how to respond to the pandemic it's heartbreaking https://t.co/QKS3k43Oin

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [12] -The intel comm knew about DEFUSE, too It came from their servers -Many people understood the importance of HlV/CoV spike homology, incl: *Gallaher, who created the system to classify spike proteins [#1] *Robert Malone, who early on advocated for them against COVID-19 [#2] https://t.co/wMPiDOlZwd

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [13] DEFUSE discusses inserting FCS's into SARS-like CoV's It also discusses looking to exploiting the DC-SIGN pathway [image from Simon Wain-Hobson's annotated version of DEFUSE] The 19nt paper describes a method via QTNSPRRA could've been inserted into the genome https://t.co/MywhJlcZsK

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [14] The potential implications are enormous, and horrific. For that reason alone, Congress should've united to support an investigation into COVID's origin long ago. Here's a few: The first deals with what you SHOULDN'T do when developing prophylaxes [per Gallaher, 1/29/20]: https://t.co/p7UPCMsDPm

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

@DeinertDoc @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @chrismartenson @TyCardon @SweenyFrank @EduEngineer @BretWeinstein @alexandrosM @RMConservative @fynn_fan @quay_dr @gdemaneuf [15] The next implication is that Fauci ignored the inventor of "fusion inhibitors" - which the WIV has now shown works on Sars-CoV-2, & MERS & SARS & Omicron & HlV-1 & 2 & of 67 Pubmed articles w/that search term, 1 came from🇺🇸 @lifebiomedguru https://t.co/It5VfQgiH0

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

[1] Gallaher was RIGHT - back on 1/29/20. & Fauci ☠️all early tr. - incl⬇️ Fusion inh. work on SARS-CoV-2?✅ in vivo?✅ EK1 & EK1C4?✅ Pan-CoV, too?✅ They also work on... Omicron✅ &... you'll never guess... HlV-1 & 2✅ & SIV✅ @Jikkyleaks @jjcouey @DeinertDoc implications... https://t.co/RYwYEOZbTb

Saved - February 19, 2023 at 5:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Struggles of Questioning Mainstream Narratives: A Call for Free Speech and Unity Introduction: In today's world, questioning mainstream narratives can be a daunting task, as Dr. Simon Goddek, a biotechnologist, discovered firsthand. His journey, marked by silencing and cancellation, sheds light on the challenges faced by those who dare to challenge the status quo. Driven by a desire for scientific integrity and critical thinking, he embarked on a quest to explore the potential of vitamin D in treating COVID-19. Little did he know that his pursuit of truth would lead to a series of events that would forever change his life. The Scientific Paper and Backlash: Dr. Goddek's scientific paper on the potential benefits of vitamin D in combating COVID-19 ignited a firestorm of skepticism and resistance. As he meticulously presented his findings, flaws in the peer-review process were exposed, raising questions about the integrity of scientific discourse. However, instead of engaging in constructive dialogue, skeptics launched a relentless attack on Dr. Goddek's credibility, dismissing his work without proper consideration. Facing Attacks and Silencing: Virologists, threatened by the implications of Dr. Goddek's research, launched a campaign to discredit him. Rather than engaging in open debate, they resorted to personal attacks and attempts to silence his voice. Despite his dedication to scientific rigor, Dr. Goddek found himself dismissed from his job, a victim of the very system he sought to improve. Furthermore, social media platforms like Twitter banned him, further limiting his ability to express his views and engage with others. The Fight for Free Speech: Undeterred by these setbacks, Dr. Goddek embarked on a legal battle to defend his right to free speech and critical thinking. His story resonates with countless others who have faced similar fates, inspiring a movement to support those who have been silenced. Prominent figures, including politicians like ABridgen and RickNichollsCKL, have joined forces under the hashtag FollowTheSilenced, sharing their personal stories and advocating for the preservation of free speech. A Call for Unity: Now, more than ever, it is crucial to stand together and ensure that voices challenging mainstream narratives are never silenced again. By supporting those who have been silenced, we can foster an environment that encourages open dialogue, critical thinking, and scientific integrity. Let us join the movement, amplifying the voices of those who have been silenced and working towards a future where free speech is cherished and respected. Conclusion: Dr. Simon Goddek's journey serves as a powerful reminder of the challenges faced by those who dare to question mainstream narratives. His unwavering commitment to scientific integrity and critical thinking, despite facing backlash and silencing, is an inspiration to many. By uniting under the FollowTheSilenced movement, we can ensure that the voices of those who have been silenced are heard and that the pursuit of truth remains a fundamental pillar of our society. Together, let us strive for a future where free speech and critical thinking are cherished and protected.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗: My name is Dr. Simon Goddek, I am a biotechnologist, and only recently @elonmusk reinstated my account after being permabanned for 1.5 years. In 2021, I took Twitter to court and curiously lost the lawsuit. #FollowTheSilenced This is my story.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2/ While I was still cautious at the beginning of 2020 because of the pictures in Bergamo, I had wondered more and more why people were forced to wear masks and no "expert" was talking about vitamin D.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3/ In good faith with science, I wrote a scientific paper on vitamin D in mid-2020 to demonstrate (by illustrating metabolic pathways) that giving "high doses" could treat covid and other health-related problems. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32768697/

Vitamin D3 and K2 and their potential contribution to reducing the COVID-19 mortality rate - PubMed The world is desperately seeking for a sustainable solution to combat the coronavirus strain SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Recent research indicated that optimizing Vitamin D blood levels could offer a solution approach that promises a heavily reduced fatality rate as well as solving the public health prob … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4/ It didn't take long for my former employer @wur to receive the first emails. They stated that I was a pseudoscientist and corona denier. My "unscientific publication" had to be retracted immediately, was the demand of these people, who were members of the "skeptical movement".

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5/ I consequently became active on @twitter end of 2020. I had never been a social media person but I felt that I could no longer be silent, given the fact that I was working at a Dutch university and being an editor of a Q1 journal at that time. This is when it all started...

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6/ Via @waukema, I learned that the German State Virologist and fearmonger, @c_drosten, got his publication on the Covid PCR test through peer review at record time. Without this specific PCR test, we would probably never have noticed this "coronavirus".

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7/ I started to analyse what happened and came to the conclusion that the peer-review process was rigged as the chronology of the events shows. I consequently wrote my first Twitter thread that went viral.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8/ These are the questions I raised: ▶︎ How did Drosten's paper make it through the peer review process within 24h? ▶︎ How does he even publish there while being part of the journal's editorial board? ▶︎ Why does the journal refuse to publish anonymous peer-review reports?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9/ Overnight I gained thousands of followers and was heavily attacked by virologists from @UniUtrecht and @erasmusuni. They tried everything to get me to take my thread (see substack link) offline. This was my first contact with the cancel culture movement.https://drsimon.substack.com/publish/post/74797608

How Scientific Fraud took the World Hostage Drosten's test is the pest. drsimon.substack.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10/ I did some more digging and also learned that @c_drosten… ▶︎ Created that specific PCR test most likely even before the outbreak of the pandemic ▶︎ Denied viral seasonality (https://t.me/goddek/1295) ▶︎ Made contradictory statements about masks (https://t.me/goddek/563)

Dr. Simon Translated the graphic of my Drosten post: https://t.me/goddek/1294. Enjoy his scandalous predictions. #lockhimup @Goddek t.me
Dr. Simon Let's take another look at Prof. Christian Drosten. What he's done and still doing can be described with the principle of gaslighting. His statements are inconsistent and unscientific, especially as we already know since the Spanish Flu outbreak 100 years ago that masks do more harm than good. Drosten didn't only provide us with the PCR tests that are the foundation of this plandemic but also holds civil society hostage. Drosten has plenty of blood on his hands and needs to be held accountable as a chief perpetrator of the current situation. My archived thread about his PCR fraud: https://bit.ly/3jlyahN t.me

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11/ …and… ▶︎ Predicted piles of corpses on African streets (https://bit.ly/3ictjy4) ▶︎ Called renowned dissidents "pseudoscientists" (https://bit.ly/36ngzle) ▶︎ Got funds from the @gatesfoundation and had his professorship sponsored by Nazi-money (Quandt Family)

Corona breitet sich schnell in Afrika aus Der Virologe Christian Drosten warnt davor, dass die Corona-Pandemie in Afrika zu Szenen führen könnte, die "wir nur aus Kinofilmen" kennen. Tatsächlich breitet sich das Virus aktuell sehr schnell auf dem Kontinent aus. n-tv.de
"Pseudo-experts": Drosten defamed well-known colleagues from Harvard, Oxford and Stanford - Freedom Of Speech A podcast is published once a week with the virologist Christian Drosten, who is very well known in Germany. This time he took the scientists of the so-called Great Barrington Declaration to his chest. According to the virologist, the renowned colleagues are “pseudo-experts”. The Federal Government and a large part of the population consider him to be the […] fos-sa.org

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12/ Questions upon questions and still no answers. My account grew. I began to post more studies, for example, about the efficacy of masks, the implementation of arbitrary measures and their effects on public health, the potential of vitamin D, etc.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13/ The more I wrote, the more "fan mail" my then-employer @wur got. My research funding expired in March 2021, but I had written an EU-funding proposal in 2020 (in my spare time) to prolong my employment. The chance to win was 1% and guess what - I won. 🥳

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14/ Even though @wur backed me and I personally raised a large amount of funding for them, I was told by phone that I would be dismissed from my position because of my tweets. They would use the money I generated to hire someone less critical. Overnight, I was out of a job.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15/ Since life in 🇳🇱 was too expensive for an unemployed person, I decided to move to 🇧🇷 to live with my partner. There I bought a few hectares of land in the jungle to escape the madness. I had to leave my family and friends behind. It hurt, but I did not have much of a choice.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16/ These were difficult months for me. The feeling of being treated unfairly and cancelled was suffocating. I just couldn't sit on it. I decided to take Twitter to court. "Justice will prevail", I thought. A naive thought, as it would later turn out.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17/ My posts must have consistently been a thorn in the side of the woke fact-checkers from Twitter's Ministry of Truth, and I've regularly been temporarily banned from Twitter for statements that are mainstream these days. Here are a few examples. #cringealert

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18/ 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗢𝗡𝗘: I referred to this publication (https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4344), which has been peer-reviewed. Twitter banned me for doing so for one week for "Violating the policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.".

Is a Mask That Covers the Mouth and Nose Free from Undesirable Side Effects in Everyday Use and Free of Potential Hazards? Many countries introduced the requirement to wear masks in public spaces for containing SARS-CoV-2 making it commonplace in 2020. Up until now, there has been no comprehensive investigation as to the adverse health effects masks can cause. The aim was to find, test, evaluate and compile scientifically proven related side effects of wearing masks. For a quantitative evaluation, 44 mostly experimental studies were referenced, and for a substantive evaluation, 65 publications were found. The literature revealed relevant adverse effects of masks in numerous disciplines. In this paper, we refer to the psychological and physical deterioration as well as multiple symptoms described because of their consistent, recurrent and uniform presentation from different disciplines as a Mask-Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (MIES). We objectified evaluation evidenced changes in respiratory physiology of mask wearers with significant correlation of O2 drop and fatigue (p < 0.05), a clustered co-occurrence of respiratory impairment and O2 drop (67%), N95 mask and CO2 rise (82%), N95 mask and O2 drop (72%), N95 mask and headache (60%), respiratory impairment and temperature rise (88%), but also temperature rise and moisture (100%) under the masks. Extended mask-wearing by the general population could lead to relevant effects and consequences in many medical fields. mdpi.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19/ 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗧𝗪𝗢: I cited (!!!) a scientist from an official Texas Senate hearing and posted the corresponding video. See:

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20/ 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗘: Here, I referred to meta-analyses that are available on http://vdmeta.com and http://c19ivm.org. Fun fact: the scientists that are running these websites have been banned from @twitter, too.

Vitamin D for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 251 studies (104 treatment studies and 147 sufficiency studies) 251 vitamin D COVID-19 studies. 37% improvement for treatment studies, p < 0.0001. 54% improvement for sufficiency studies, p < 0.0001. c19early.org
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 196 studies Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 196 studies c19ivm.org

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21/ 𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗨𝗥: In June 2021, I was banned for asking questions. The @gatesfoundation really invested that much into BioNTech (https://endpts.com/biontech-partners-with-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-scoring-55m-equity-investment-novartis-sells-china-unit/). Why was it prohibited to ask questions?

BioNTech partners with Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, scoring $55M equity investment; BeiGene brushes off short attack → Less than two months after German biotech BioNTech raised a herculean $325 million in an upsized round of financing — the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation have signed a pact with the company, making an initial equity investment of $55 million to develop vaccine and immunotherapy candidates to prevent HIV endpts.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22/ One day later, my account got permabanned. My impact was probably too big (400 new followers per day and 3K likes on average) that Twitter pulled the ripcord. My account was banned for "targeted harassment" without Twitter providing me with a specific explanation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23/ Even after requesting further information about permanently locking my account, Twitter refused to give me the actual or specific reason for the suspension. Since I had moved to Brazil in the meantime, I took Twitter to court here.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24/ I contracted one of the best lawyers for media law in Brazil, who informed me in beforehand that Twitter is the worst social medium and that they usually do not care about free speech. He told me that there is a high likelihood that they’d have to reinstate my account.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

25/ However, due to the "pandemic," the hearing could not take place in person. Instead, we had a Zoom Call. Present were the judge, my lawyer, me and six (!!!) lawyers for Twitter.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

26/ The Brazilian armada of Twitter lawyers explained during the trial that I was not banned for "targeted harassment" but for spreading dangerous medical falsehoods (i.e. Twitter initially lied). Nevertheless, I was also presented with the tweet that led to my final suspension.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

27/ The second hearing was in writing only. The judge's decision was then made in March 2022. It was argued that it did not matter whether my statements were correct or not. According to the judge, Twitter has digital domiciliary rights in Brazil.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

28/ The Twitter chapter was therefore closed for me. My permaban was politically motivated and there was nothing I could do about it. So I put my energy into my Telegram channel (https://t.me/goddek) and my new permacultural life in the Brazilian wilderness.

Dr. Simon PhD in biotechnology. Sharing insights about health, nutrition, vitamin D, permaculture, and COVID madness. Gettr: gettr.com/user/goddeketal Gab: gab.com/goddeketal Bastyon: bit.ly/3usNpuw Minds: minds.com/goddeketal t.me

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

29/ In the meantime I have found a new job and my Twitter account has been reinstated thanks to @elonmusk. What remains is that we have been insulted, cancelled, ridiculed, and publicly discredited for speaking out against irrational measures.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@elonmusk 30/ My story is one of millions. Many of you have surely suffered a similar, if not worse, fate. That is precisely why we must stick together and support each other. My PMs are open and on @telegram I read every single one of your comments. It's wonderful that you all exist!

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@elonmusk @telegram 31/ We who have been cancelled must finally be heard again. Hence #FollowTheSilenced instead of #FollowTheScience. My story was just one of many. Many like-minded people share a similar fate with me. Some of them are...

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@elonmusk @telegram 32/ Journalists such as: @naomirwolf, @tracybeanz, @vigilantfox, @thechiefnerd, @KanekoaTheGreat, @kylenabecker, @ElectionWiz, @RealJermWarfare, @ChelleWards, @usmortality, @MichaelPSenger, @jeffreyatucker, @danastingregory, @YaffaRaz, @jamesfWells, @EtanaHechtDC...

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

33/ @delbigtree, @hodgetwins, @ShellenbergerMD, @MarioNawfal, @Lukewearechange, @SebGorka, @greggutfeld, @EmeraldRobinson, @sonia_elijah, @beverleyturner, @chrismartenson, @JanJekielek, @mrmarkdolan, @ianmSC, @EthicalSkeptic, @birb_k, @JordanSchachtel.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel 34/ Freedom activists such as: @TexasLindsay_, @robinmonotti, @liz_churchill8, @DSchlopesIsBack, @DowdEdward, @Lilith_Assyria, @Large_Farm, @bobscartoons, @stkirsch, @thecoastguy, @efenigson, @RobertKennedyJR, @prof_freedom, @TaraBull808, @FiveTimesAugust, @BrendanEich, @ooana.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana 35/ Scientists such as: @JesslovesMJK, @RWMaloneMD, @drmikehart, @DrLoupis, @molsjames, @MarkChangizi, @DrEliDavid, @DrJBhattacharya, @UngaTheGreat, @RealJoelSmalley, @davidjthunder, @FatEmperor, @Mala_Naicker, @jordanbpeterson.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @drmikehart 36/ @MartinKulldorff, @MartyMakary, @zoeharcombe, @DrPPhillipsMD, @MLevitt_NP2013, @SHomburg, @NaturallyFTW, @jikkyleaks, @IamBrookJackson, @denisrancourt, @PoliticalMoons2, @MikeDonio, @goddeketal (me).

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana @JesslovesMJK @RWMaloneMD @drmikehart 37/ MDs such as: @doc_singing, @KLVeritas, @DrTeckKhong, @MdBreathe, @LynnFynn3, @Doctor_Iver, @drcole12, @richardursomd, @DrJackieStone, @SabinehazanMD, @NeputeWellness, @lawrie_dr, @P_McCulloughMD.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana @JesslovesMJK 38/ @Doctor_I_am_The, @Saikmedi, @houmanhemmati, @Tom_Rumi, @arkmedic, @BrianLenzkes, @kacdnp91, @molsjames, @dockaurG, @DrKellyVictory, @akheriaty, @DrHenryEaly, @PierreKory, @GeorgeFareed2, @DrSyedHaider.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @Saikmedi @houmanhemmati @Tom_Rumi @arkmedic @BrianLenzkes @kacdnp91 @molsjames 39/ Politicians such as: @ABridgen, @RickNichollsCKL, @mrddmia, @RepTroyNehls, @BrianKempGA, @repmattgaetz, @ChrisLandauUSA.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@delbigtree @hodgetwins @ShellenbergerMD @MarioNawfal @Lukewearechange @SebGorka @greggutfeld @EmeraldRobinson @sonia_elijah @beverleyturner @chrismartenson @JanJekielek @mrmarkdolan @ianmSC @EthicalSkeptic @birb_k @JordanSchachtel @TexasLindsay_ @robinmonotti @liz_churchill8 @DschlopesIsBack @DowdEdward @Lilith_Assyria @Large_Farm @bobscartoons @stkirsch @thecoastguy @efenigson @RobertKennedyJr @prof_freedom @TaraBull808 @FiveTimesAugust @BrendanEich @ooana @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @Saikmedi @houmanhemmati @Tom_Rumi @arkmedic @BrianLenzkes @kacdnp91 @molsjames @ABridgen @RickNichollsCKL @mrddmia @RepTroyNehls @BrianKempGA @RepMattGaetz 40/ Many of them will also share their personal stories over the next few days under the hashtag #FollowTheSilenced. Please follow them so that they may never be silenced again. Cheers and thanks for joining the fight for freedom. Simon (@goddeketal)

Saved - March 10, 2023 at 6:46 AM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@ShellenbergerMD Condemns the Secret Twitter Blacklists Used to Suppress Distinguished Scientists "Professor @DrJBhattacharya had no idea he was on it. I mean, this is East Germany, Stasi kind of behavior. That's what this is."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, a respected epidemiologist, was visibility filtered and placed on a secret blacklist. This blacklist was used to deplatform and reduce visibility for doctors and scientists who shared information contradicting the CDC's narrative. Despite the fact that their information was scientifically valid, they were targeted. Professor Bhattacharya was unaware of being on this blacklist, which is reminiscent of the behavior of the East Germany Stasi.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jay Bhattacharya, the Stanford professor, who I don't think anybody considers a fringe epidemiologist, was indeed I'm sorry. I couldn't I didn't piece it together. He's he was indeed, visibility filtered. Speaker 1: Correct. And so this blacklist that was created that really was used to, deplatform, reduce visibility Yes. Create lists internally where people couldn't even see their profiles. That was used against doctors and scientists who produced information that was contrary to what the CDC was putting out despite the fact that we now know that what they were publishing had scientific basis and, in fact, was valid. Speaker 0: Absolutely, and not only that, but these are secret blacklists, so professor Bhattacharya had no idea he was on it. I mean, this is East Germany Stasi kind of behavior. That's what this is.
Saved - August 29, 2023 at 9:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The number of medically grounded pilots has increased significantly, with reports of sudden deaths and collapses. Covid vaccines are being blamed, as the UK Civil Aviation Authority and RAF both saw a rise in unfit-to-fly cases. Commercial pilots experienced a 75% increase, while RAF pilots saw a 27% rise. Brexit is also cited as a factor, as British pilots transferred their licenses after leaving the EU. Concerns about vaccine side effects, such as heart inflammation and blood clots, are raised by pilot activists. The impact on air safety and security is a growing concern.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

1. 🚨 PILOT FOI RESULTS: Medical groundings up 27% in RAF. Commercial pilots have 75% increase! Authorities blame Brexit. Pilot community question v@c*ines. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/authorities-in-denial-over-vaccine-link-to-soaring-pilot-deaths/

Authorities in denial over vaccine link to soaring pilot deaths - The Conservative Woman Authorities in denial over vaccine link to soaring pilot deaths conservativewoman.co.uk

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

2. Three more pilots ‘died suddenly’ this month. IndiGo Captain Manoj Subramanyam, 40, suffered a cardiac arrest boarding at the gate at Nagpur airport. He died on his way to hospital. Qatar airlines lost a ‘very fit’ senior pilot aged 51 who died while travelling ...

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

3. ...as a passenger on flight QR579 flight from Delhi to Doha. LATAM Flight LA505 from Miami to Santiago, Chile, was diverted to Panama after Captain Ivan Andaur, 56, collapsed and died in the toilet. @JimFergusonUK @JoshYoder @AussieFlyers @USFreedomFlyers

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

4. In Alabama, a student pilot suffered a cardiac arrest & received CPR mid-flight. He was revived on the ground. Meanwhile there are reports of 15 other incidents involving pilot collapses and deaths. One caused a crash that killed everyone on board, including a 2-year-old girl.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

5. Many think Covid vaccines, rolled out at the end of 2020, are to blame. Between 2021 and 2022, the UK Civil Aviation Authority’s (CAA) ‘unfit to fly’ numbers showed a 75 per cent increase, while the RAF said that 27 per cent of their pilots were medically downgraded.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

6. All pilots need to demonstrate a less than one per cent chance of developing serious illness to pass their annual medical, which makes these numbers unusual. @ABridgen @LozzaFox @BadLawTeam @KathyConWom

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

7. Here are the CAA’s numbers from the last five years of all medically grounded commercial and private pilots: · 2018 – 1,550 – normal year · 2019 – 1,663 – first covid cases reported in December 2019 ⬇️

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

8. · 2020 – 851 – air travel restricted because of lockdowns, covid infections at their worst, no vaccine until December · 2021 – 1,594 – vaccine widely available from January and mandated for US and Australian pilots in November but not for British, ...

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

9. ... the majority of whom would have taken the vaccine or faced restrictions flying to countries with vaccine mandates · 2022 – 2,784 – post vaccination, huge increase in failed medicals – 75 per cent. More than 25 per cent is an unusual increase for RAF pilots, but..

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

10. ...what about the 75 per cent increase in commercial pilot groundings? The correspondence on this issue has been long and arduous but it seems that Brexit is partly to blame. When we exited the European Union (EU), British pilots were registered with the ...

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

11. ...European Union Aviation Safety Agency. They de-registered with EASA then re-registered with the CAA. CAA said this accounted for the increased numbers: ‘Around 8,000 pilots transferred their European licences to other EU countries and then applied for a UK licence in 2022.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

12. What about the RAF’s numbers? In January 2023, US Airforce Lt Col Theresa Long, raised the alarm for service personnel. She said: ‘I saw unusual diagnoses and alarming trends only after the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccinations.’ @LTCTheresaLong

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

13. Dr Long testified in court that in just one afternoon she had heard from four pilots whose MRI scans showed they had myocarditis. What does that mean to air safety and our country’s air security? Pilot activists US Freedom Flyers and Aussie Freedom Flyers say ...

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

14. ...vaccine side-effects, known to cause heart inflammation, blood clots & strokes, are a factor in pilot incapacitations. Former Virgin Australia captain Glen Waters @AussieFlyers revealed disturbing information: ‘Heart attacks and strokes in our industry are extremely rare.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

15. ‘Pilots know they’re vaccine injured. One hardly made it home from his second shot. It took him 3.5 hrs to drive an 80-minute journey. He kept pulling over because he was fainting and sweating. He thought he was going to die. He ended up with pericarditis and leukaemia.

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

16. ‘Another pilot had myocarditis post vaccination & had 6 months off work. After 8 months his cardiologist said “You’re over it, you can go back to work”. He said: “I don’t know why because I can hardly function. I wouldn’t survive a 12-hour day at work." @DrJackieStone

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

17. ‘A third pilot in that situation got his medical back and did one day at work and it almost killed him. He resigned the next day. Now he has a carpet cleaning business.’ @MakisMD @efenigson @USFreedomFlyers @ukmfa1 @theHFDF @EthicalSkeptic @IamBrookJackson @Fynnderella1

@Beck_Sall - Sally Beck

@LeeMaisey2 @hicksyalex @chrislittlewoo8 @HowardSteen4 @annvandersteel @DrDMartinWorld @ChildrensHD @ChildrensHD_EU @VigilantFox @Thomas_Binder @hedleyrees @JanJekielek @GAvAdCoaltition @CaimHaven @Jikkyleaks @DavidCartland @KLVeritas @SeanBFlanagan @thecoastguy @_aussie17

Saved - September 17, 2023 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple court cases have been run over the years, highlighting potential harms from vaccines and their limited effect on transmission. Mandates, lockdowns, arrests, and school closures lacked a solid basis. Those who lost jobs should be compensated by pharmaceutical companies. Supporting this clinical trial should cost individuals their jobs. A study showed increased COVID risk with more vaccine doses. #OVMatter #Jikkyleaks #DrJBhattacharya #dragonfishy #ClareCraigPath #CartlandDavid #DenverUlland #lawriedr #PMcCulloughMD #Covid19Critical

@TonyNikolic10 - Tony Nikolic ⚖️ Corinthians 15:58- John 8:32

BOOM Share Share!! We have run multiple cases Kassam v Hazard and others in courts over the years claiming not only the potential harms from jabs, but little effect on transmission, does NOT confer immunity, did not stop hospitalisation or death! IT IS CLEAR TO ME NOW AS IT WAS THEN- THERE WAS AND REMAINS NO BASIS FOR MANDATES, LOCKDOWNS, ARRESTS, SCHOOL CLOSURES AND EVERYONE WHO LOST THEIR JOBS SHOULD BE COMPENSATED BY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND ALL THOSE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS WHO SUPPORTED THIS CLINICAL TRIAL AT GREAT EXPENSE EMOTIONALLY, FINANCIALLY, AND PROFESSIONALLY SHOULD IMMEDIATELY LOSE THEIR JOBS! Thankyou for information @OV_Matter You’re only BOOSTING Pfizer’s SHARE PRICE Study from Jan-2023 Likelihood of testing POSTIVE compared to the UNVAXED 1dose1.70x 2dose2.36x 3dose3.10x 4dose3.80x A study of 50k ppl demonstrated the MORE SHOT U TAKE, the GREATER the RISK of COVID @Jikkyleaks @DrJBhattacharya @dragonfishy @ClareCraigPath @CartlandDavid @DenverUlland @lawrie_dr @P_McCulloughMD @Covid19Critical

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a study, it was found that the risk of contracting COVID-19 increased with the number of vaccine doses received. Compared to those who were not vaccinated, individuals who received one dose were 1.7 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19. The risk increased to 2.6 times for those who received two doses, 3.1 times for those with three doses, and 3.8 times for those with more than three doses. The study showed a clear correlation between the number of vaccines received and the risk of testing positive for COVID-19. The results were highly significant, with a P value of 0.001, indicating a 99% likelihood of being a genuine result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 50,000 employees. The more COVID vaccines they had, the more infections that they got. The more vaccines they had, the more infections they got. And I strongly suspect that the FDA and the CDC and the U. K. Health Security Agency and the Europeans Medicines Agency and the MHRA or all these people around the world are going to be scrabbling around to try and reproduce these very important results, unless, of course, they're not. Let's get straight down to the main points. The risk of COVID nineteen also varied by the number of vaccine doses previously received, a direct quote from the paper we're going to be looking at. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID nineteen. Clearly, these regulatory bodies are going to be desperate to replicate this very important finding. Let's hope the monitors as we speak. Now these were the actual results here. Now, I know you can't see those, so I've blown them up. So, what it shows was vaccine doses versus a covered risk during the 3 months of the study period. So compared to people that weren't vaccinated, that had never been vaccinated, one dose of vaccine, those people were 1.7 times more likely to test positive for COVID during the 3 months of the study. Not quite twice as likely, but nevertheless, 1.7. These were more than twice as likely. People that had 2 doses, 2.6, 3 times more likely to test positive for COVID during the 3 months of this study. But it gets worse. Those who had 3 doses of vaccines were 3.1 times more likely to test positive for COVID during the study. And those that had more than 3 doses were 3.8 times more likely to test positive for COVID during the study. And here is actually the, the graphic they produced on this. So what we actually see here is, the the the this started on the 12th September. This was the 1st day of the study through the 98 day of the study. Now people that had and this is the cumulative risk for getting a COVID nineteen infection or testing positive, but they did test quite readily because it was a health facility. So no doses of the vaccine, it went up during the course of the study. One dose of the vaccine, it went up More, more infections. 2 doses, it went up more. 3 doses, it went up more. So we see the more vaccines people received, the greater the risk that they tested positive for COVID during the course of the study, a really important finding. So just to summarize that, 1.7 times more likely, 2.36 more likely with 2 doses, 3.1 times more likely with 3 doses, 3.8 more likely with, 4 doses. Now the P value here is P equals 0.001. This means that the authors are 999 out of 1,000 confident that this is a genuine result. It's a highly significant result. In other words, it's 99% likely to be a genuine result, P equals 0.0 1.
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 10:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The pandemic was mishandled by doctors who lacked firsthand experience with COVID patients. Arrogance in medicine is dangerous. The focus on saving Grandma resulted in unintended consequences, such as memory loss. Mistakes included treating kids the same as vulnerable groups, relying on vaccines to stop a mutating virus, silencing advocates of early treatment, and neglecting natural immunity. The solution lies in preserving the microbiome and letting doctors be doctors. The long-term effects of mRNA vaccines and the alteration of the human microbiome are concerning. The vaccinated may face future issues, and the impact on the planet is significant. Public health officials should be elected by the people every two years.

@SabinehazanMD - sabine hazan md

What was dangerous @TheChiefNerd was a bunch of Drs who never touched COVID patients guide the world. How many patients did Dr Fauci, Dr Collins, or Dr Jha examine, touch, and save during the pandemic? Arrogance is the killer of Medicine and Mankind. We are at a crossroads where the microbiome of humanity is disappearing, and with it, humanity. This was a pandemic that focused on saving Grandma but, in reality, killed Grandma or, worse, made her forget the names of her grandchildren. The biggest mistakes of the pandemic in My humble opinion was: 1. Treating kids the same as the old and immunosuppressed. 2. Thinking we could vaccinate and stop a virus that mutates. 3. Stopping and censoring the voices of those who used early treatment. 4. Forgetting Natural immunity trumps any manufactured shot. The answer was in the gut all along. The answer was #SAVETHEBIF and #LETDRSBEDRS. Manipulating microbes is a terrible mistake, and The repercussions of mRNA vaccines will carry on for generations... While the world thought the unvaccinated were the problem, it is the vaccinated that will have issues in the future…Removal of Spike protein embedded in cells or loss of bifidobacteria is not easily fixed. Worse, this alteration of the human microbiome will impact the soil and the planet overall… Lastly, Public health officials need to be voted in by the people for the people, and it should be a 2 yrs job...

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Francis Collins Says The Great Barrington Declaration Tried to 'Short Circuit' the Science: 'I Don't Regret Saying It Was Dangerous, It Was' "That Declaration would have been a great opportunity for a broad scientific discussion about the pros and cons, but that's not how it was presented on the day it was presented. It was presented to the Secretary of Health & Human Services, Alex Azar...This was an effort to take a very fast track of something which would have potentially been a major change in national policy without the opportunity for any debate or discussion. As somebody who is deeply engaged in the federal effort to try to save lives, I saw this and I was deeply troubled. I regret that I used some terminology that I probably shouldn't, that somebody should put forward a devastating takedown of the dangers here, and I regret that. But I was deeply worried. And in a few days, no less than 14 of the public health associations of the United States altogether wrote a scathing takedown of the great Barrington Declaration, saying this would probably kill tens of thousands of people. And so ultimately, that was the scientific discussion. But the effort was made by the authors and some help from Dr. Atlas to try to short circuit all that and get that into a policy decision without the opportunity for debate. So I don't regret saying this is dangerous, it was." @DrJBhattacharya @ScottAtlas_IT @MartinKulldorff @SunetraGupta

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Great Barrington Declaration, presented by three distinguished epidemiologists from Stanford, Oxford, and Harvard, proposed a focused approach to protect the vulnerable while allowing the virus to run its course through healthier individuals. However, it was mischaracterized by Fauci as a "let her rip" strategy, which was not true. The declaration aimed to spark a scientific discussion, but it was fast-tracked without debate or discussion. Many public health associations criticized it, claiming it could lead to tens of thousands of deaths. Despite regretting his choice of words, the speaker expressed concern about the declaration's potential dangers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the great Barrington Declaration, and and I know this is something that you and I have also talked about, so we're just being completely honest here. Okay. Yeah. The Great Barrington Declaration was for anybody who doesn't know, it was a document that was presented by, 3, professors, Stanford, Oxford, and Harvard, epidemiologists and then And and now hundreds of thousands, if not over a 1000000 people, have signed on to this, very much proving that that there was no actual consensus on what the response should have been. It was very much about a focused approach for the most vulnerable among society. Fauci mischaracterized it in in in a way as let her rip, if you've heard that, which was not true. That was never the the the intention of it. But so so the the whole thing of of shutting down the argument as opposed to having the argument and and and things like that, was another big contentious point for the people. So when we when I think about, You know? Don't make mandates. Make better arguments. Don't shut down the conversation. Have the conversation. Win on the battlefield of ideas. Do it in a civil way, but do it in the intellectual, good natured way that we would do at Braver Angels. Let's say you. Speaker 1: I'm glad to talk about this and appreciate the chance to explain a little bit about the context because I don't know that that's gotten Clearly explained. So this was October of 2020. We had no vaccines. People were dying at high rates at that point across the country, but particularly in cities. There Was a hope we might have a vaccine in another couple of months, but nobody knew if it was gonna work. These 3 epidemiologists, very distinguished by their credentials, We're convened, in a gathering in Massachusetts by Scott Atlas, who was at that time advising the president. And they put together this short declaration which said, let's stop with the closures of businesses and schools. Most people who are under 60 or 65, if they get the virus, they're gonna survive. Let's not try to protect them. Let's try to protect those who are vulnerable, the elderly, and maybe some others who are compromised. And, eventually, the virus will run its course, through the healthier people. And, we will be able to get through this without so much damage done, to daily life. It was sort of a letter rip as far as the younger people. I I will maybe it's not a great phrase, but it was different than what was currently being proposed. Different. That declaration would have been a great opportunity, for a broad scientific discussion about the pros and cons, but that's not how it was presented. On the day it was presented, It was presented to the secretary of health and human services, Alex Azar. It would have been presented the next day to the president if he wasn't in Walter Reed at the time being treated for COVID. This was an effort to take a very fast track of something which would have potentially been a major change in national policy without the opportunity for any debate or discussion. As somebody who is deeply engaged in the federal effort to try to save lives, I saw this and I was deeply troubled. I Regret that I used some terminology that I probably shouldn't, that somebody should put forward a devastating takedown of the dangers here, and I regret that. But I was deeply worried. And in a few days, no less than 14 of the public health or associations of the United States Altogether wrote a scathing takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration saying this would probably kill tens of thousands of people. And so, ultimately, that was the scientific discussion, but it the effort was made by the authors and some help, from doctor Atlas, to try to short circuit all that and get that into a policy decision without the opportunity for debate. So I don't regret saying this is dangerous. It was.
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 12:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
After examining Pfizer's final clinical study report, I found evidence of non-compliance with Good Clinical Practices (GCP). Several individuals, including volunteers in the trial, have reported serious adverse events that were not properly documented. This raises concerns about the integrity of the trials and the safety of the product. The lack of adherence to established guidelines is alarming, and further investigation is necessary. The COVID clinical trials appear to be a fraudulent endeavor that has been approved by global health agencies. The victims of this fraud have been abandoned, and it is unacceptable that their concerns are not being taken seriously. The time for safe and effective clinical research is over.

@StatChrisCotton - Christine Cotton OFFICIEL

I have quicky examined the Pfizer’s FINAL FULL CLINICAL STUDY REPORT. They claim to be compliant with the Good Clinical Practices (GCP), which is, as proved by - my report according to a methodological point of view : https://christinecotton.com/english_expertise - my friend Brook @IamBrookJackson experience on the Ventavia centers - my friend Augusto Roux @RouxAugusto and Maddy de Garay’s mother @shdegaray73 , volunteers into the trial who claim that serious adverse events were not reported into the database and in the CSR completetly wrong. The tables of contents also refers to GCP as the CSR content must follow the established guideline ICHE3 https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E3_Guideline.pdf I thought for a long time that the biases and GCP violations might be due to urgency, but the amazing work of true researchers in the trial database brought to light major problems (missing patient numbers, more PCR tests for placebo, obvious lack of respect for blinding in the centers...) that need to be investigated @Jikkyleaks @canceledmouse @DrJKunadhasan @RetsefL @FluoridePoison @joshg99 @a_nineties. Today, with 3 years' hindsight and 2 years of harassment and insults of all kinds, I can announce that the covid clinical trials are looking like a vast fraud. This fraud brought to market a product for which we have very few evidences of efficacy, and countless evidences of lack of safety. And this with the approval of all the world's health agencies. The references in this report (GCP, ICH) prove me right once again: emergency or not, no trial should break the rules that have been established for decades. https://ich.org/page/efficacy-guidelines @hedleyrees has proved that these trials does not follow Good Manufacturing Practices. Vial analyses confirm product toxicity @Kevin_McKernan already claimed by @SabatierJeanMa1 For more than 2 years, the victims have been abandoned and are looking for solutions to cure themselves and survive. This is absolutely unacceptable and outrageous, both for our governments and for the Drs who continue not to take them seriously. Pandora's box has been opened and the time for clinical research aimed at bringing safe and effective products to market is over. Have a nice last day of 2023 PS: thoughts for MEP Michèle Rivasi who passed away suddenly this year, and her loved ones. She was one of the rare shining lights of integrity in our political world. @BrianneDressen @React19org @JSutta @SosNielsen66 @ake2306 @HouseLyndsey @DiedSuddenly_ @eekymom @Answers4Sean @nichilasmartin @anettefri @LotteLilje @TbirdTmoney @Charletukcvfam @oneadds @thecoercednurse @shfty78 @AdverseReports @bowie792 @awtaxis @rachel_loeb @AnnieWBelle @BedelaBee @DanniHerve @rgvrunner01 @Nohj_85 @ink4kTV @Seb_Desautels @ItsNurseBecca @missingsnowman @ukcvfamily @CraftsByAlison @RealNotRare @covidinquirysco

Christine Cotton - Site Personnel Je vous mets à disposition ici les résultats de mes investigations et expertises, mes interviews et actions judiciares, et des liens et explications sur les documents source des essais cliniques. Vous y trouverez mon « Evaluation des pratiques méthodologiques mises en œuvre dans les essais Pfizer dans le développement de son vaccin ARN-messager contre la COVID-19 en regard des Bonnes Pratiques Cliniques »... christinecotton.com
Page not found | ICH Database database.ich.org

@StatChrisCotton - Christine Cotton OFFICIEL

@ouestmoncycle @lilou_lm95 @AAVIC_TEAM_03 @VaxC19Acouphene @19VVC @guilhemeric @MalloChloe @mat035863 @didier_magne @MarcMerlin43288 @KarinModerna @Revahb1 @enlojuti @Helenekerma @DiedSuddenlyFR @Pinfarctuspfize @FBenharira @Riolionel44 @annaigiannac @mussomichele13 @C19React @blais_gloriane @Dr_Steph_GAYET @LaurenceKayser @ErikLoridan @RogezVeronique @PerseusGroup_ @drpguerin @CShoemakerMD @ClareCraigPath @VPrasadMDMPH @shmuelcshapira @Fynnderella1 @DrJohnB2 @marc_g_wathelet @PierreKory @HamelinMd @DrLoupis @kacdnp91 @KenPaxtonTX @SenRonJohnson @RandPaul @CVI_Network @Ireland2020 @ControlGroupHQ @JamesMelville @JimFergusonUK

@StatChrisCotton - Christine Cotton OFFICIEL

@ICANdecide @TexasLindsay_ @Outsideboxin @JanJekielek @EpochTimes @RepublicWelsh @mysweetmoon1983 @jathorpmfm @welcometheeagle @_taylorhudak @JoshWalkos @nic_moneypenny @dystopian_DU @lawrie_dr @VeriteDiffusee @EloVeut @ericahenriquezo @MaryamHenein @FreeWCH @GibertiePatrice @AnnaChrolowska @DeChazournesEPL @tvlofficiel @Tocsin_Media @BOROWSKIMIKE @nicolasputsch @Ligne__Droite @Houdiakova @TribuneLibre1 @Poulin2012 @EricMorillot @Cercle_Aristote @Planetes360 @JusteMilieu3 @Etienne_Chouard @NBouvierOff @akina_schira @KarineDubernet @karlitozero @andrebercoff @GendarmesLibres @MaxDelvallee @PascalPraud @BlancsMasques @OSTERElizabeth1

@StatChrisCotton - Christine Cotton OFFICIEL

@IamBrookJackson @ouestmoncycle @lilou_lm95 @AAVIC_TEAM_03 @VaxC19Acouphene @19VVC @guilhemeric @MalloChloe @mat035863 @didier_magne @MarcMerlin43288 @KarinModerna @Revahb1 @enlojuti @Helenekerma @DiedSuddenlyFR @Pinfarctuspfize @FBenharira @Riolionel44 @annaigiannac @mussomichele13 @C19React @ICANdecide @TexasLindsay_ @Outsideboxin @JanJekielek @EpochTimes @RepublicWelsh @mysweetmoon1983 @jathorpmfm @welcometheeagle @_taylorhudak @JoshWalkos @nic_moneypenny @dystopian_DU @lawrie_dr @VeriteDiffusee @EloVeut @AndersonAfDMdEP @M_KolakusicFr @Rob_Roos @ladyonorato @v_joron @PatGaudreault76 @dupontaignan @alainhoupert @MullerBronnL @noel_sylviane @SyndicatSLS @solidekla

Saved - December 4, 2024 at 6:31 AM

@Faceles007 - 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗦𝗦 🐭 💜

@_johnbye @Jikkyleaks WHO, Jeremy Farrar, Peter Daszack, Swalesdale Mutton (crew), Gorkson, Susan Oliver, Marianna Spring, Brent Lee, Ian Copeland, Peter Hotez, Viki Male, Doritmi, Dan Defunct Wilson. A mixed bag of: Globalist cabal, agents, propagandists, paid-influencers, and criminals. https://t.co/eqPdY3AHdT

Saved - April 23, 2024 at 5:11 PM

@PatientCV - Patientmakt

@bobscartoons Have you heard this from Dr. Strecker about HIV (genetically modified virus)? WHO ordered a t-cell-destroying virus... no vaccine can "cure" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OumDcU_Ndo

Saved - May 25, 2024 at 3:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The author criticizes Kristian Andersen and Fauci for publishing fraudulent research funded by $8.9 million. They also mention a conspiracy involving Scripps, Buffett, and the CIA. Post 2: Tax dollars went to Scripps, and the author highlights the connection between Richard Gephardt, Hunter Biden, Nathan Wolfe, and Jeffrey Epstein. Post 3: The author suggests that people are paid to lie about elections, mentioning Maricopa County and Garrett Archer. Post 4-8: The author acknowledges and thanks several individuals for their support in pandemic research. Post 9-10: The author questions the involvement of the House Select Committee, Mike Gallagher, Ginkgo Bioworks, and Baillie Gifford, suggesting a conspiracy involving the CIA, Israel, London, and CCP. Post 11-12: The author gives shoutouts to EFxScout1League and CharlesRixey.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Kristian Andersen (Scripps Research Institute) got $8,900,000 from Fauci to author/publish The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 — the most fraudulent bullshit ever printed in a major “science” journal. Hell, they named a f’ing lab after the guy lmao. (PS: Scripps = BUFFETT/CIA.)

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Is the military really the only people we can trust? Is there any government agency we can rely on?

Video Transcript AI Summary
CIA and FBI whistleblowers warn of compromised assessments on COVID origins, violating COVID Origins Act. FBI whistleblower reveals analysts changed position on lab origin for financial incentives. Government colluding with social media to censor speech, violating First Amendment. Facebook complied with White House demands to suppress vaccine side effect information. This collusion poses a threat to free speech and accountability. Public must be aware of the dangers of censorship and the need to protect free speech rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dangerously compromised warns CIA and FBI whistleblowers. You're not the only one to report this, of course. But, I was reading your report on it this morning. This is something that you have been warning about for quite some time and the allegations stem from a whistleblower who has come forward to the House, a whistleblower from the Central Intelligence Agency. I have the letter, the relevant letter here from the House Oversight Committee. The whistleblower alleges that a CIA team was paid to change its assessment of the origins of COVID-nineteen. Do I have that broadly correct to set your understanding of the report? Yes. This is obviously a bombshell report, deeply, deeply troubling. I'm glad that the House is going to look into it. We should look into it. What caught my attention is you point out in your article on this that the government has deliberately violated the COVID Origins Act which this body passed unanimously, which the House passed, the President signed into law, and maybe wasn't so happy about signing it into law but he did. It is the law of the land and which required that all of the government's intelligence on the origins of COVID be made public. Instead, what the administration did was offer up a summary, which they then in turn heavily redacted. And you point out that in addition, the government refused to the administration refused report the names of scientists who fell ill at the Wuhan Institution Institute of Virology in 2019 despite the fact they know the names. The intelligence community knows the names. Now you're absolutely right to say this is a violation of the COVID Origins Act and I would know because I wrote it. So I'm not very happy about the fact that this administration continues to flaunt, flout, completely ignore public law passed again unanimously by the United States Senate. For what end I can't tell. I can't figure out why in the world. I don't know what partisan gain there is to it. Why in the world they want to lie to the American people? You conclude your article by saying the government has become extremely comfortable with lying to us. Just explain what you mean by that. And tell us why you think this is so significant. Well, sure. Speaker 1: And just on the very specific point of we were the first to identify the the 3 people that contracted the coronavirus in China. They were the people working on gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Wall Street Journal confirmed our reporting 2 weeks later. And then I think it was 1 week after that or a few days after that, the ODNI report came out and it did not reveal this information. And we had multiple sources, the Wall Street Journal. We have no idea if the Wall Street Journal sources were the same. But, I think we're clearly seeing a lot of abuses of power occurring in multiple executive, agencies. So we've seen it with the FBI. One of the things that we noted yesterday was that we saw perverse incentives in the FBI to go after so called domestic violent extremism, pulling an agent off of things like child exploitation, on to really hyping a set of cases that that particularly appear to be aimed at spreading disinformation around the idea that there is a significant increase of of domestic extremism when we don't think that the evidence shows that. And now we see this report, that came out that suggested there's an FBI whistleblower who says that 6 of the 7 analysts had said it was a laboratory origin and that they had reversed their position in some exchange for some sort of a salary bonus or some sort of financial incentive. So and we've been you know, so we keep documenting it. We just keep finding agencies and agencies, DHS involved in trying to create a disinformation governance board. I keep, you know, the censorship industrial complex, we just keep finding new parts of it. So in the research for this testimony, we discovered this deep trust alliance that had, you know, what appears to be ties to the security and intelligence agencies of the United States government appears to be trying to set itself up, although it's now kind of ghosted after 2021, but appeared to try and set itself up to decide what is reality and what are fakes for people. And I think it should have a chilling effect in that that's not how we do free speech in America. We don't have government agencies. We don't have cutouts or front groups that appear to have support from those agencies telling the American people what's true, what's false, or telling social media companies behind the scenes what they should be censoring. And just Speaker 0: to that last point, we now know thanks to the case Missouri versus Biden that that's exactly what this administration from the White House to the FBI to the State Department to the CDC to CISA have all been meeting with the social media companies for years now giving them direct commands about what to censor and take down, naming specific accounts and specific speech they want suppressed, threatening the social media platforms if they don't do it. And remarkably, I and I'm quoting the court here, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, and there's a huge evidentiary record. Everybody can go, don't take my word for it. Go read the record. It's all on the record from the district court. What the 5th Circuit said is remarkably the social media platforms all complied. All of them. They all agreed to be tools of the United States government and to censor what they were ordered to censor, to suppress the speech they were ordered to suppress. You're a journalist. Tell us about the threat to the First Amendment. And by the way, just for the record, I think it's important to establish. The Federal Court of Appeals said directly in no uncertain terms, this was a clear violation of the United States Constitution. The First Amendment does not allow the federal government to use private companies to censor what they wouldn't be able to do it themselves. And that's exactly what this administration has done. Tell us as a journalist, the threat to free speech, to freedom of the press from this kind of collusion between a very powerful government trying to hijack every media company you can get its hands on. Speaker 1: Sure. I mean, if you just start on the issue of the COVID vaccine, for example, public interest advocates spent a very long time trying to get the pharmaceutical, requiring the pharmaceutical companies to list the side effects of their drugs in their advertisements. Here we saw a situation where people were sharing, information about the side effects of the vaccine, on Facebook and other social media platforms, and the White House demanding that it be taken down, Facebook complying acknowledging that it was often true information. We also saw that Facebook's own internal research showed that actually it increases vaccine hesitancy when you censor those stories that people are if they wanna be comfortable with a new drug, they need to be able to talk it out a bit. So Facebook told the White House that actually would backfire. The White House insisted Facebook caved in because according to the Facebook executive Nick Clegg, he said, well, we've got this other business that we need to do with the White House, which is the data flows, meaning we need to we need the White House to help us negotiate with the Europeans to bring our data back to the United States. So I think the 5th Circuit Court did a great job in identifying the clearly coercive measures, but I don't think it went far enough to because the First Amendment, it prevents the government from abridging or infringing on free speech, offering an incentive to social media platforms such as helping them with their dispute with Europe in exchange for censoring often true content, though of course the First Amendment also protects false content, I think it's a very chilling effect. I think it's very disturbing. Anybody that cares about holding powerful entities, to account should be disturbed by what we saw take place on Facebook, on Twitter. And, you know, I think that I think we just have to remind ourselves and what disturbs me when I hear sort of the conversation on AI coming into it sort of with the beginner mind, I hear a lot of talk about how to protect the public from harm. We have to protect the public from harm. What people are saying is that we need to censor speech, censor certain voices, censor disfavored voices because of this idea that it will cause real world harm. This is a well documented phenomenon that psychologists have measured where over decades people have just grossly expanded their definition of things that cause harm. And I think that we need to kind of, this should be a moment for a reset that, free speech is almost absolute in the United States with a few So So it's been a chilling effect as a journalist I've personally been censored by Facebook. I think the platforms are out of control.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Lots of tax dollars went to SCRIPPS the past few years. Good thing they named long-time HUNTER BIDEN ASSOCIATE, RICHARD GEPHARDT, CHAIRMAN of SRI in 2010. That way, RG could run cover for NATHAN WOLFE, another HUNTER BIDEN (and JEFFREY EPSTEIN) associate from MetaBiota and GVP.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

They’d do all THAT, but you think they wouldn’t pay people to LIE about elections? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 (Yeah, they already do that too.) Sometimes, they make their COVID lackeys pull DOUBLE DUTY and do ELECTIONS too. Like how MARICOPA COUNTY does with Scripps (CIA) asset, GARRETT ARCHER.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Btw, massive credit to some fantastic friends and colleagues for their support in this huge pandemic research endeavor: @EFxScout1League @_KrisHunter_ @dezzie_rezzie @BlackTomThePyr8 @InWuchang @LabLeak @veryvirology @merissahansen17 @DschlopesIsBack @pathogenetics @CanariesBlue

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Also @JesseMatchey and @AGHuff too! Both great fighters and glad they’re on our side!🙏🏼

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@JesseMatchey @AGHuff @pepesgrandma deserves a huge amount of credit here too! Sorry if I leave anyone out. I’m doing this off the top of my head because I can’t access my old account.🙏🏼

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@JesseMatchey @AGHuff @pepesgrandma @DakotaSidwell and @TrueNorth444 have been incredible in this too! Please give them a follow.🙏🏼

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

As has @Theonlyme333 and @Amy31129057!🔥

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@Theonlyme333 @Amy31129057 Also, WTF is the HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE and WI-R MIKE GALLAGHER doing with GINKGO BIOWORKS (In-Q-Tel) and CELL PROGRAMMING? Lol, love how CIA/Israel/London are using CCP as the scapegoat for Zionist Jew bioterrorism. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/house-select-committee-tours-ginkgo-bioworks-previews-biofab1-ginkgos-new-integrated-data-generation-facility-set-to-launch-in-2025-302060620.html

House Select Committee Tours Ginkgo Bioworks, Previews Biofab1, Ginkgo's New Integrated Data Generation Facility Set to Launch in 2025 Members of Congress visited Ginkgo's Boston Seaport headquarters to discuss strategies for bolstering U.S. ability to compete in AI applications for... prnewswire.com

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@Theonlyme333 @Amy31129057 REFRESHER: BAILLIE GIFFORD is the LARGEST SHAREHOLDER of http://WIX.com (IDF UNIT 8200) and GINKGO BIOWORKS (IN-Q-TEL, CIA) and manages 5 of the 7 LARGEST PENSIONS. THIS is why FACEBOOK helps STEAL ELECTIONS. CIA/MOSSAD/ISRAEL are waging biowarfare for JEWISH SUPREMACY.

Your website, your business, your future|Wix.com Create your website and grow with confidence. From an intuitive website builder to advanced business solutions & powerful SEO tools—Try Wix for free. wix.com

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@Theonlyme333 @Amy31129057 Another shoutout to @EFxScout1League on the Gingko Bioworks/House Committee tip!🙏🏼🔥

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

@Theonlyme333 @Amy31129057 @EFxScout1League @CharlesRixey gets a big shoutout too!🔥

Saved - September 11, 2024 at 9:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers around concerns regarding the presence of graphene in COVID-19 vaccines, referencing leaked documents from Argentina's FDA. Participants discuss the implications of this finding, with some urging further investigation and testing. Disagreements arise over the focus on graphene versus other harmful aspects of vaccine technology. A molecular biologist emphasizes the need for qualified scientists to address these issues, while others express concerns about broader agendas, including transhumanism and AI integration.

@IanHurn0 - Ian Hurn

@ET_sharing @Yohmini2 @KristieIushkova @BarelyBook @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @_aussie17 @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @JanciToxDoc @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @RepClayHiggins @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @P_J_Buckhaults @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 @IamBrookJackson

@la5acolumna - La Quinta Columna

🇬🇧🇺🇸 #English - Analysis of the “dengue vaccine” Qdenga, and of the “flu vaccine” Istivac 4, carried out by the biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi before a Notary Public. Graphene oxide is found in the same way as in “covid vaccines”, a material not declared in the composition. What is happening is terrible: they are introducing a toxic and radiomodulable material in all types of inoculums. We call on the entire scientific community to analyze in their respective countries, not only “covid vaccines”, but any injectable, and denounce it to the relevant authorities. The entire world population is being poisoned. 📺 Web version: https://www.laquintacolumna.info/translations/analysis-of-the-dengue-vaccine-qdenga-and-of-the-flu-vaccine-istivac-4/

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Spanish Summary:** Tras adquirir la vacuna Qdenga contra el dengue y la ISTIBAC cuatro contra la gripe en una farmacia, un grupo de biotecnólogos, junto a un escribano público, analizaron las vacunas bajo un microscopio de fluorescencia. Afirman que el análisis reveló que el diluyente de la Qdenga, supuestamente agua con cloruro de sodio, contenía una gran cantidad de material particulado fluorescente, similar a lo observado en las vacunas contra el COVID. A pesar de tener fórmulas diferentes, ambas vacunas mostraron material particulado. En la vacuna contra la gripe, se identificó una partícula fluorescente de gran tamaño. Un escribano público documentó el proceso, desde la compra de las vacunas hasta el análisis microscópico, incluyendo números de lote y detalles técnicos del microscopio utilizado. Se tomaron capturas fotográficas para documentar los hallazgos. **English Translation:** After acquiring the Qdenga dengue vaccine and ISTIBAC four flu vaccine at a pharmacy, a group of biotechnologists, along with a public notary, analyzed the vaccines under a fluorescence microscope. They claim that the analysis revealed that the Qdenga diluent, supposedly water with sodium chloride, contained a large amount of fluorescent particulate matter, similar to what was observed in COVID vaccines. Despite having different formulas, both vaccines showed particulate matter. In the flu vaccine, a large fluorescent particle was identified. A public notary documented the process, from the purchase of the vaccines to the microscopic analysis, including batch numbers and technical details of the microscope used. Photographic captures were taken to document the findings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: En el día de ayer, después de la jornada laboral, nos fuimos con un escribano público a una farmacia donde ya habíamos comprado una vacuna contra el dengue, Udenga, de Laboratorios Takeda y la ISTIBAC cuatro, ¿si? Contra la supuesta gripe, nos fuimos a analizarla en el microscopio de fluorescencia. Estábamos tres biotecnólogos, el escribano y una compañera ayudando a registrar todo. Es terrible, esto lo hicimos porque ya Martín Monteverde la semana pasada había analizado la QDENGA y esta vez lo hicimos con el escribano público desde, para que no digan que no hay trazabilidad, desde la del retiro de estos productos de la farmacia, y es terrible que Qdenga declara en la solución que viene ahí, que supuestamente es agua con cloruro de sodio, cuando la pones al microscopio óptico y después con fluorescencia, eso está lleno, no sabemos si es del hidrogel, pero que lo que quiero que quede claro es que no es agua y cloruro de sodio, ¿sí? Está lleno de material particulado, hay partículas fluorescentes, se ve idéntico a lo que se ve en las vacunas de COVID, por dios. Speaker 1: Acá estamos analizando la Qdenga y la Estiban cuatro. Increíble. Material por particulado, por doquier, y a pesar de que son fórmulas totalmente diferentes, lo que vemos es lo mismo en todas. Y esta partícula increíblemente grande. Acá, acá estamos tres biotecnólogos. Escribano y la grande Natalia de Vega, compañera. Y filtro dos, ¿no? Speaker 2: Sí, filtro dos, ciento cincuenta milisegundos, o sea, nada. Nada. Si lo ponemos en trescientos un poquito más Speaker 1: Te va a saturar. Speaker 2: Sí, pero ya ahí es bajo también. Speaker 1: Mira. Dos horas ya llevamos o tres. Ya me perdí el tiempo. El tres verde. Speaker 3: ¿Cuál quiere apostar que prende? Speaker 1: Ahí tienen la vacuna de la gripe. Speaker 2: Sí. Speaker 1: Sigan confiando en su gobierno. Ya por la morfología, sí puedo decir, es óxido de grafeno. Speaker 2: Bueno, claro, se va a tener que ver en la cabecita también. Speaker 3: Pero, Speaker 1: principalmente, entonces, en el dos y en el tres esta partícula. ¿No? Todas, en el uno, en el dos y en el tres, sí. Acá analizamos el diluyente que tiene cloruro de sodio y agua para inyectables, eso es lo declarado, pero lo real ni se imaginan la cantidad de material particulado. Speaker 2: Va girando con una hélice de aquí, mira. Speaker 1: Bueno, ya lo último, ya estamos todos agotados. Speaker 2: A ver qué encontrá con con mucha Speaker 1: No, mostrar lo sucio que está esto, y la otra peor la culé. Speaker 2: ¿La cantidad de partículas? Speaker 3: Alineadas. Speaker 1: Bueno, vamos cortando. Entonces, yo ya para eso voy a ir apagando la lámpara. Perfecto. Bien. Entonces, esto por un lado. Después, con esto ya quedó todo guardado. Preguntame vos, Francisco. Speaker 3: No, repasó un poco. Bueno, siendo la diecisiete cero cinco, me constituyo en compañía de La Requirente en la calle Avenida Argentina, trescientos treinta y uno de esta ciudad, en la farmacia avenida. Observo un cartel en el cual dice farmacia óptica ingresaron y La Requirente solicita La primer inyector es y el segundo inyectable es cuatro. La persona que nos atiende es Mauricio Celave, empleado de la farmacia, quien se identificó Una vez en el laboratorio de la universidad, nos encontramos con el licenciado en biotecnología Nicolás Gustavo Boareto, DNI treinta seiscientos sesenta y cuatro trescientos cuarenta. Y el licenciado Alejandro Barbosa, DNI veintinueve trescientos ochenta y tres novecientos cincuenta y dos, también biotecnólogo tecnólogo. Speaker 2: Procede Speaker 3: procede la requirente a abrir las muestras y que se van a ver mediante el microscopio Nikon Eclipse ochenta I, con cámara Nikon DS guión R1i. Programa y software utilizado es el NIS Elements VR tres punto dos, y la primera muestra es de el diluyente. Speaker 1: El diluyente de Qdenga de Laboratorios Taquera. Speaker 3: De de Laboratorio Taquera. Número de lote, vencimiento y número de serie agregados al acta, y la ISTIBAC cuatro, lote, vencimiento, número de serie, y la primera, o sea, el primer inyectable en el diluyente se hacen dos muestras. Una realizada por la licenciada Lorena Diblasi, y la otra realizada por el licenciado Boleto. En ambas observamos Speaker 1: Material particulado. Speaker 3: Bien. Speaker 1: Gran cantidad de material particulado, fluorescencia, partículas fluorescentes, algunas florecían, otras no. Pero muchísima cantidad de material particulado que no se condice con lo declarado, que es agua para inyectables con cloruro de sodio. Lo que está ahí adentro no es eso. Ya Speaker 2: Sí, y y muchos materiales pegados y y floreciendo en en los extremos, Speaker 3: o sea. Speaker 1: Sí, con fluorescencia en campo claro. Speaker 2: Extremo, claro, en campo claro. Speaker 1: Como fósforos. ¿Podemos decir eso? Speaker 3: Bien, perfecto. Se hace la segunda la segunda muestra y, bueno, vemos fluorescencia en en el en el modo tres y en el modo dos, es lo que está anotando. Y por último, la lo último que viste vos, Alejandra. Y también se observó fluorescencia. Speaker 1: Y lo raro es que, a pesar de que tienen fórmulas totalmente diferentes, estamos viendo lo mismo. Speaker 3: Bien. Speaker 1: Es más, la pudenga yo creo que tenía más material particulado, ¿no? Que la de la gripe. Así prevista. Pero ahí en la de la gripe es donde vimos esa partícula fluorescente gigante. Speaker 3: Bien, dos. Speaker 1: Dos. Speaker 2: Una de ochenta y cinco metros. Speaker 3: Sí, tengo la filómetro, perdón, tengo la tengo la foto. Speaker 2: Y la otra de la otra, no sé, no se me no entraba en el campo. Eran dos campos, más Speaker 1: o menos. Sí, es Speaker 3: Bueno, de todo de todo el de todo el Appchat, dejamos constancia de que se tomaron capturas con el con el software y las capturas fotográficas, ¿Sí? Que una vez procesadas van a formar parte de la presente acta. Speaker 1: Bueno. Speaker 3: ¿Sí? Mil gracias. Dejamos constancia también de la hora de finalización, que son las veinte treinta y un obras del día viernes veintiséis de abril de dos mil veinticuatro.
Analysis of the “dengue vaccine” Qdenga, and of the “flu vaccine” Istivac 4. – La Quinta Columna laquintacolumna.info

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@IanHurn0 @Yohmini2 @KristieIushkova @BarelyBook @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @JanciToxDoc @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @RepClayHiggins @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @P_J_Buckhaults @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 Pfizer Whistleblower @MelissaMcAtee92 1. U posted Pfizer's internal.database showing Graphene in Vials on Facebook. Has it been recovered or can it be viewed? 2. Is lab @la5acolumna Laquinta Or Dr Campra,Almeria Uni?Scroll way up 3. Details on findings?

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@Yohmini2 @KristieIushkova @BarelyBook @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @_aussie17 @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @JanciToxDoc @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @IanHurn0 @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @RepClayHiggins @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @P_J_Buckhaults @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 PFIZER DOC SHOW GRAPHENE - Whistleblower @MelissaMcAtee92 Pfizer's internal database from Lab🇪🇸Spain Covid💉injection vial(up 2 Third!)had GrapheneOxide. Pfizer no followup lab request 4 samples 4 structural analysis" Post report & Pfizer lawyer say Co property @IamBrookJackson

Video Transcript AI Summary
In August 2021, Speaker 0 found documents on a database. In June or July 2021, Speaker 0 found a Graphene oxide report from Spain stating a lab found Graphene oxide in one vial of Pfizer vaccine that didn't have a full dosage. The lab compared it under a microscope to 100% Graphene oxide and determined they looked almost identical, but requested more samples for structural chemical analysis. Later, Speaker 0 followed up and, if remembered correctly, 28 out of 100 Pfizer vials had graphene oxide. Speaker 0 shared the report on Facebook, believing it was public knowledge. A Pfizer lawyer called Speaker 0 and told them to take down the post because it was company property. That's when Speaker 0 realized they could see the internal database.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Documents on the database in August, 2021. Speaker 1: So in August 2021 and and thank you for that. I mean, it's such a, it's it's it's what you did was so brave and and bringing this to light, I mean, it must have been frustrating because, you you know, you can't get media to listen. But then okay. So you you start to find these documents, and and what did you find in these documents? Speaker 0: The first thing I found was in, I think, June or July of 2021, and it was a Graphene oxide report from Spain that this lab had found Graphene oxide in one vial of Pfizer vaccine that didn't have a full dosage in it. And so they compared it under microscope to 100% Graphene oxide, and they determined that it looks almost identical, but requested more samples so that they could do a more structural chemical analysis than just visual. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And later, much later, I followed up on them to see what had happened. And I if I'm remember correctly, 28 vials out of a 100 were did have graphene oxide of the Pfizer vials. Speaker 1: Add Graphene Oxide. Did you have any evidence that Pfizer followed up with the Spanish, lab, that they that they did anything, or was it this was this just the initial sample that they looked at? Speaker 0: So it was the initial sample they requested more. And when I shared when I found this on the internal Pfizer database, I didn't know it was the internal Pfizer database. I actually thought it was just Internet public knowledge. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But I shared that report on my Facebook, and I got a call not long after that. I I don't know how long, but not long after that from a Pfizer lawyer telling me I had to take down the post because that was company property. And that's when I realized, hey. I guess I can see the internal database, and so I just would search

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@IanHurn0 @Yohmini2 @KristieIushkova @BarelyBook @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @JanciToxDoc @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 ARGENTINA FDA LEAK DOCS SHOW GRAPHENE IN COVID INJECTION - Anmat their FDA leaked this. They tried 2 retract however retraction made no sense The goal is not 2 proof or advocate. Graphene is in Covid injection, instead that @Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher c merit 2 test vials

@BarelyBook - Barely Bruised Books

@ET_sharing @IanHurn0 @Yohmini2 @KristieIushkova @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @JanciToxDoc @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 Graphene is EVERYTHING. Please ask yourself why these tecnofascists would rather distract you with Convid injections????? 1.https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-pollution/evaluating-new-substances/chemicals-polymers/risk-assessment-summaries/new-substances-notification-20405.html 2.The following definition applies in this notice: “substance” means GRAPHENE https://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2020/2020-11-28/html/notice-avis-eng.html

New substances: risk assessment summary, new substances notification 20405 - Canada.ca Summary of Risk Assessment, New Substances Notification 20405: Graphene (Chemical Abstracts Service registry number 1034343-98-0) canada.ca
Canada Gazette, Part 1, Volume 154, Number 48: GOVERNMENT NOTICES November 28, 2020, Part 1, Volume 154, Number 48, Canada Gazette gazette.gc.ca

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

No, graphene is NOT everything. You are siloing just as you accuse others. We know the harm that comes from the different aspects of the tech without graphene. It doesn’t have to be one or the other. Forcing this is disingenuous just like the bullying that you take part in regularly. If you want people to listen then quit being an ass.

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

I’m not disagreeing that there could be nefarious aspects beyond what I’m trained in, in this tech. The delivery method of the message is what is caustic. I’ve gone to the papers, listened to the talks. As a scientist I find that some of what is alleged in the papers posted is not what is being presented in the papers. Any disagreement gets my viewpoint immediately blocked. As I’ve said before. Get some qualified scientists in this area to come forward and explain the tech. Not hobbyists, not midnight researchers. This will go a lot further in getting your warnings out.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Im a sorry but please would you take this also in consideration: #Transhumanism is Satanic by nature & the ( former hidden ) movement behind #UN #Agenda21 + #17SDGs = #Actionplan WEF, WHO, NATO & EU for the #4IR = roadmap to a posthumanworld. Will it not be through fear for Cov19 or ClimateChange, than it will be enforced by chaos creation through AI driven war/ weather-& mindmanipulation click on post & the repost 4 all info : 👇🎯🛢

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post & repost About #Transhumanism, which is the ( formerly hidden) movement behind the UN ( Agenda21- 2030) and its satelite organisations like WHO, NATO, WEF Listen to @GreggBraden, a five-time NYTimes best-selling author, scientist, international educator and…

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a battle for our humanness, framed as a battle between good and evil, where light and dark are energies given significance. Nations will go to war to distract us from the power of human divinity, which is only possible through the biological body and our ability to transcend perceived limitations. The transhuman movement aims to replace our bodies with synthetics, stealing our ability to access our divinity. Global events, such as conflicts in Ukraine, Russia, the Middle East, and Israel/Palestine, are happening because the battle for our divinity has intensified. These events distract us from inner focus. Many politicians and leaders are unaware that they are pawns in this ancient battle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a battle for our very humanness that is unfolding right now. It's an ancient battle. The frame is a battle between good and evil or light and dark. Ultimately, light and dark are simply energies until we give them the significance that we give to them. There's something deep within each of us that is so powerful, so precious, so sacred, so beautiful that nations will go to war with other nations to keep us distracted. It is the power of human divinity that is only possible through the biological body. The power within us to transcend perceived limitations. There is a movement, the transhuman movement, to replace our bodies with synthetics, chemicals in the blood, sensors under the skin, computer chips in the brain, artificial intelligence. By virtue of doing so, it steals from us our ability to access our divinity. So what we're seeing playing out in the world today, whether you're looking at Ukraine and Russia, the role of America, or you're looking at the Middle East, or looking at Israel and the Palestinian, and you look at everything happening all around that, are happening now because the battle for our divinity has intensified to such a degree that these are the events that it takes to keep us from that inner focus. Now I'm not saying that everyone, every politician, every leader of every nation certainly is aware. Many of them are pawns. They don't even know that they're pawns in this ancient battle of good and evil, of of light and dark.

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

Of course. I agree that this whole agenda of trans humanism and the merging of humans with AI which I also believe is their agenda is evil and satanic. I’m not dismissing the tech it’s where to put my resources as a molecular biologist and toxicologist in dealing with what I know and have been trained in. Should divert my attention to learning a new topic or stay on my path of exploring the DNA altering aspects even of this tech? If you want the involvement of someone that truly understands this tech and how to stop it it seems that if as Sabrina says there are all kinds of people working in this discrete field then they should be the ones interfacing with the molecular biologists on how these technologies merge with the molecular biological systems to actuate secondary control systems with AI. It’s not a matter of not wanting to understand… truly I’ve spent many hours on this.. it’s whether my expertise retrained is an appropriate surrogate for someone else that knows the system because they do it for a living. I’m not at all dismissing the potential of this tech being more advanced than we realize as strictly “humanists”. It’s trying to put my time and research into what I feel I can credibly support and rebut with my own knowledge base. Please don’t get me wrong. I’m trying to help as I can and have reposted for those who may know more. God bless..

@KristieIushkova - Kristie Iushkova 🌺

@JanciToxDoc @Yohmini2 @ET_sharing @IanHurn0 @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 As a molecular biologist, regardless of technical training or ‘expertise,’ one in the field would still be well aware of the aspects of what is being discussed, albeit to a limited extent

@KristieIushkova - Kristie Iushkova 🌺

🚨Graphene in rGO Communication Systems🚨 #BioDigitalConvergence

@KristieIushkova - Kristie Iushkova 🌺

@Yohmini2 @ET_sharing @IanHurn0 @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 She answered and immediately blocked me before I could even respond!

@threadreaderapp - Thread Reader App

@KristieIushkova @fear2022 @CorinneNokel @remotelyrising @GreyAreaMonarch @Sensors_MDPI @LegendreKristy @DonnieDarkened @MrPatriot76 @ElizabethHood28 @KristieIushkova Hello, you can read it here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1804627850462404796.html See you soon. 🤖

Thread by @KristieIushkova on Thread Reader App @KristieIushkova: 🚨Coincidences? The universe is rarely so lazy. So, the balance of probability is…🚨🫡 #WBAN #WSN #IEEE #NoConsent #BioConvergence Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNTs) scholar.google.com/scholar?q=...… threadreaderapp.com

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

@KristieIushkova @Yohmini2 @ET_sharing @IanHurn0 @fear2022 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @remotelyrising @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @JesslovesMJK @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @kevinnbass @Doctor_I_am_The @HOPEGIRLBLOG @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @connerben @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @RedpillDrifter @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 Sabrina Wallacce - Dr. Janci should know better as a Molecular Biologist. Time to look at Molecular Engineering in Vivo in Humans IEEE 1901.1 / 1901.1 #MedicalBodyAreaNetwork #BiomedicalTelemetry Computer Networking through the Human Body https://odysee.com/@Psinergy:a/trim.CC09FC7E-95EF-49BD-AAFE-C4908A54A7C7:d?r=EiseixsuZudcC5KF7DrkTiYZ7riK8GX5

Odysee Explore a whole universe of videos on Odysee from regular people just like you! odysee.com
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 8:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists, doctors, and politicians who pushed the COVID and vaccine narrative remain in power while individuals lose their jobs. Various individuals, including pediatricians and professors, have made discriminatory statements without facing consequences from their respective institutions. The frustration lies in the fact that expressing an opinion led to being fired, while those spreading incitement and lies retain their jobs. A mega thread with more examples will be shared soon.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Fair point! What makes me furious, however, is that all the scientists, doctors, and politicians who pushed the COVID and vaccine narrative are still comfortably in power, while insignificant individuals lose their jobs. Get your priorities straight, folks! 🧵A THREAD…

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Let me get this straight, @libsoftiktok 'went too far' holding Home Depot accountable, but the cashier making online thrəats didn't? Y'all are wild. https://t.co/8l9BkCz7Dt

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Alastair McAlpine (@AlastairMcA30) has been openly lying and discriminating against the unvaccinated and even mocking vaccine injury victims. Yet, he remains a pediatrician at @bcchildrenshosps. How is this acceptable? https://t.co/p1NhvOA70X

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@AlastairMcA30 Dick H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) has shamelessly dehumanized the unvaccinated and called for their exclusion from society. Despite such egregious statements, he has faced no consequences from @RutgersU. https://t.co/xIWD0CKuoK

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

David Fisman (@dfisman he/him) spent three years equating mask and vaccine opponents with Nazis while spreading baseless lies. I was fired for stating the opposite of him; yet he is still employed at @UofT. https://t.co/iVQLkZa7C0

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Emily Oster (@ProfEmilyOster) believed that the unvaccinated should be excluded from society. Despite her Stalinist views, she remains a professor at @BrownUniversity. https://t.co/QG8rI2UwIK

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@ProfEmilyOster @BrownUniversity Journalist Kristen Brown (@kristenvbrown) has declared the unvaccinated as a danger to everyone. Apparently, this isn't grounds for dismissal at @Bloomberg, as she still works there. https://t.co/rEOlesVnaG

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Even @annemcelvoy's misanthropic outbursts haven't harmed her; she now works for the far-left outlet @politico. https://t.co/kCklQ8YlE7

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Even @jameskmcauley faced no consequences. Despite advocating to "make life a living hell for the unvaccinated," he is still working for the fake-news outlet @washingtonpost. https://t.co/3IbM4MSFFk

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@washingtonpost Peter Hotez (@PeterHotez) has labeled vaccine critics as terrorists that need to be dealt with. He also lied before Congress. Yet, he’s still employed by @Baylor and @TexasChildrens. https://t.co/PehqvHb86v

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@washingtonpost @PeterHotez @Baylor @TexasChildrens I could go on and on. My archive includes 300 people with quotes, etc. It makes me furious that I was fired twice as a scientist for expressing my opinion, while these inhumane individuals still have their jobs despite their incitement and lies. Mega thread coming soon!

Saved - October 16, 2024 at 7:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall when millions of cancer screenings were canceled, leading to unnecessary deaths, while absurd dance routines took precedence. I highlight various instances that suggest the COVID narrative was misleading, from the concept of asymptomatic illness to questionable public health measures. I remember the inconsistencies in mask mandates, the dismissal of Ivermectin, and the bizarre behaviors encouraged during the pandemic. Now, I'm back to share the truth and expose those responsible for the chaos we experienced.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵THREAD: Remember when they cancelled millions of cancer screening appointments, leading to a significant increase in avoidable cancer deaths, while they performed ridiculous dance routines instead? Let me show you 24 more pieces of evidence proving that COVID was a BIG HOAX.⬇️

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#1 Remember when being symptomless was considered a symptom? The lie that one could be asymptomatically ill, along with fraudulent PCR tests, is what made this plandemic possible. Either you are sick or you aren't; being healthy was not a symptom of illness until 2020.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 Remember when the CCP 🇨🇳 released CCTV recordings showing people collapsing in the streets like sacks of rice, catching themselves with their hands just before impact, and then shaking spasmodically? They said it was one of the Covid symptoms, and nobody ever questioned it.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 Remember when Big Pharma shills and vaccine pushers like @PeterHotez told us that Ivermectin was horse paste and potentially harmful? It turned out it could have saved millions of lives. Their true intention to mislead the general public needs to be criminally investigated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #4 Remember when cashiers and customers were separated by large Plexiglass screens, yet the cashier touched all the products that the customer then took home?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #5 Remember when they told us that eating while seated in a restaurant would be safe, but a simple walk to the restroom could potentially be lethal and thus required wearing a face diaper?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #6 Remember when the flu totally disappeared in 2021, and they said it was simply because Covid was more transmissive? There's nothing simple about eradicating influenza from 100+ countries in just 28 days.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #7 Remember when activities such as jogging alone at the beach, reading a book on a park bench, or taking a walk after 8 pm were considered threats to public health, but staying inside, avoiding the sun, and eating unhealthy delivery fast food were not?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #8 Remember when you were considered a social menace if you walked in the opposite direction of the arrows in supermarkets? I still haven't completely understood the logic behind it, and I wonder how many millions of lives have been spared by this measure.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez #9 Remember when public health officials and cringeworthy politicians, such as meathead @BilldeBlasio, tried to lure people into getting vaccinated with unhealthy things like doughnuts and fast food? Inflammatory 'food' plus clot shots – what could possibly go wrong?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the possibility of receiving free fries and a burger upon getting vaccinated. They check with Bill Meadhart about whether it's too early to eat a burger, suggesting it could be considered breakfast. The speaker acknowledges that some people love hamburgers while others don't, emphasizing respect for all preferences. They suggest thinking of the burger when considering vaccination, expressing optimism that this association will improve vaccination rates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Free fries when you get vaccinated? I got vaccinated. You're saying I could get this, a delicious fry? Why not? But there's also a a burger element to this? Let me, let me check with Bill Meadhart. Is it too early in the day to eat a burger or not? This could be breakfast? Okay. I want you to look at this and think about, again, some people love hamburgers, some don't, really wanna respect all ways of life. But if this is appealing to you, just think of this when you think of vaccination. Vaccinations. I'm getting a very good feeling about vaccination rate this moment.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio #10 Remember when they said that masks were reducing transmission, but neighboring states (e.g., North Dakota with lockdowns and a mask mandate, South Dakota as a free society) with and without mask mandates showed similar amounts of 'cases'?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio #11 Remember when the Covid PCR protocol paper, co-authored by @MarionKoopmans, bypassed peer review and was published within one day? It was then declared the gold standard by a WHO committee the very next day, a committee on which Koopmans was a member. https://www.drgoddek.com/p/how-scientific-fraud-took-the-world

How Scientific Fraud took the World Hostage Drosten's test is the pest. drgoddek.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans #12 Remember when 'public health experts' such as @DrLeanaWen asserted that the vaccines worked, yet claimed that the unvaxxed still posed a threat to the vaccinated? And why has she still not been deported to China? By the way, I’ll drop another thread on her later this week. https://t.co/X9oH5PlfNz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccinated people are safe around each other, but when surrounded by unvaccinated individuals, especially in areas with high coronavirus transmission, spillover infections can occur. Vaccinated individuals can still get infections, though they tend to be less severe, demonstrating the vaccine's effectiveness. However, with variants like Delta, vaccinated people could still contract the virus and transmit it to family members. Therefore, vaccinated individuals should not assume they are fully protected, as there remains a risk of infection and transmission as long as unvaccinated populations exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are paying a price for the actions of the unvaccinated because what we know is that the vaccinated are very safe around one another. So the 2 of you, all of us, if we're vaccinated, we're safe around each other. But if we're vaccinated and we're surrounded by a whole bunch of unvaccinated people, especially in areas with high coronavirus transmission, there's going to be spillover. And that's what we're seeing, that we're seeing vaccinated people also get infections. Now they tend to not be severe infections, which points to the effectiveness of the vaccine, but it's possible that especially with the Delta variant, we could still get them. We could pass it on to our family members. And so I think it's really important that vaccinated people stop thinking that we're fully protected. We're very well protected, but as long as there are

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen #13 Remember when they tried to convince us that natural immunity was a dangerous conspiracy theory? Shame, @kieraevebutler! https://t.co/R7RCzNYTl9

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler #14 Remember when scientists like @oatila and @R_H_Ebright wanted to silence those with differing opinions and exclude them from society, instead of seeking a substantive dialogue on equal footing? https://t.co/zDji4z5sNv

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright #15 Remember when they showed fake photos of coffins from Bergamo, Italy, in March 2020, which terrified the world and contributed to the lockdown frenzy and global PsyOp? https://t.co/KJ7ZvzjkM5

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright #16 Remember when @BillGates said that the investments in the Covid 'vaccines' were his best investment ever? It's quite obvious that he knew what was going to happen, considering he invested about $50,000,000 in BioNTech, a company that until then had only reported losses. https://t.co/WsNygWv7mE

Video Transcript AI Summary
An investment had over a 20 to 1 return. If that money went into an S&P 500 and dividends reinvested, it would be around $17 billion, but it is thought to be $200 billion. People were told they would not get COVID if vaccinated, and the vaccines were highly effective. Vaccinated people supposedly did not carry the virus or get sick, and the vaccines were good against variants. Vaccination was promoted to protect individuals, reduce transmission, and allow society to return to normal. The goal was to stop transmission and achieve high immunity levels to eliminate infection. Vaccinated individuals could supposedly feel safe from infection and avoid hospitalization, ICU, and death. Fully vaccinated people were told they no longer needed masks and could participate in activities without masks or distancing. However, it was later stated that the vaccines didn't block transmission, only slightly reduced it, necessitating new vaccine approaches. The virus level in the nasopharynx of vaccinated and infected individuals is the same as in unvaccinated individuals. Reports suggested increased severe disease risk among early vaccine recipients. Israel is seeing waning immunity against infection, hospitalization, and death, suggesting boosters are essential. The plan is for every adult to get a booster shot. One of the best investments ever was mentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been over a 20 to 1 return. Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S Speaker 2: and P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000. Here. Yeah. Speaker 3: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 4: These vaccines are highly, highly effective. Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus. Don't get sick. Speaker 4: They're really, really good against variants. Speaker 0: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. Speaker 1: Get your first shot, and when you're due for your second, get your second shot. Speaker 0: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Speaker 4: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 3: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, you're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 1: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission. Speaker 0: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce transmission. We need a new new way of doing the vaccine. Speaker 2: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level as the level of virus in the nasopharynx of an unvaccinated person. Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early. And if you look at Israel Mhmm. Which has always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us, they are seeing a waning of immunity, not only against infection, but against hospitalizations and, to some extent, death. A booster might actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have. Speaker 3: The plan is for every every adult to get a booster shot. Speaker 0: Clearly, one of the best investments, I've ever been involved

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates #17 Remember when politicians, journalists, and other public figures all suddenly began using the phrase 'Build Back Better', including @BillClinton who 'likes them young'? In a real deadly pandemic such an orchestrated show would have been possible. https://t.co/oFxPZxHjdy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The phrase "build back better" is being used in the context of recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic. Joe Biden uses "build back better" as a campaign slogan. A booklet called "Build Back Better" was written after coronavirus. Some believe "build back better" is connected to a "great reset," described as an opportunity to rethink and reset the ways in which we live. The theory alleges Biden's slogan is a front for this conspiracy. The great reset involves building the future we need. Some view the pandemic as an opportunity for this reset.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a very pertinent question to ask how do we build back better. To build back better or whatever. Do you have a chance to reset the clock and build back better than before? To build back better than before. Remember the the terrible damage of COVID as we try to build back from this, global pandemic. Joe Biden calls it build back better. Build back better. Building back better. To do things differently. To build back better. We're gonna build it back better. And build it back better. And my plan to build back better. Start taking all the problems that have been created in education, mental health, and start to to build back in a positive way. I have launched a booklet called Build Back Better, written after coronavirus. It's about building this country back better. Growing conspiracy following it. It is called the great reset. Unprecedented opportunity to rethink and reset the ways in which we live. The great opportunity for reset. The theory even calls mister Biden's campaign slogan build back better, a front for the conspiracy. Build back better. Building back better our economy. Build back better. All elements of the great reset are fundamental to building the future we need. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. It's a big effort to some would say to build back back better. We would say to really have a reason great reset. Conspiracy. Conspiracy. Conspiracy.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton #18 Remember when the mainstream media blamed the unvaccinated for the deaths of vaccinated people, asserting it was because they were not vaccinated themselves? If a treatment does not work, it is simply illogical to blame those who rejected the treatment for its failure. https://t.co/UhsfxnAouE

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton #19 Remember when @K_G_Andersen changed his stance on COVID's origins in just four days, subsequently receiving additional funding from Fauci, and then labeled everyone questioning his 'scientific integrity' as 'anti-science'? That POS definitely belongs behind bars! https://t.co/Kv2iKAiE6G

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton @K_G_Andersen #20 Remember when they shifted the narrative by considering people who died within two weeks of vaccination as unvaccinated? https://t.co/QoO8B8xqIz

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton @K_G_Andersen #21 Remember when, in the name of science, people were getting arrested simply for soaking up vitamin D at the beach, even though sufficient vitamin D serum levels could reduce the chance of getting ill by almost 98%? https://t.co/h3LQ1VvebA

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton @K_G_Andersen #22 Remember when they frightened people to the point where they believed they’d only be safe outside if they sat in chalk circles? https://t.co/QOpAp29Orf

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton @K_G_Andersen #23 Remember when thousands of users were booted off this platform for posting Ivermectin studies, while the promotion of Remdesivir and Paxlovid was actually encouraged? How many millions of lives could have been spared if critical scientists and doctors had not been silenced? https://t.co/EmiUwID20v

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

@PeterHotez @BilldeBlasio @MarionKoopmans @DrLeanaWen @kieraevebutler @oatila @R_H_Ebright @BillGates @BillClinton @K_G_Andersen #24 Remember when I was de-platformed from Twitter for speaking the truth? Well, I'm back, and I won't let them silence me again! If, like me, you are not ready to forgive, I invite you to follow me (@goddeketal) and enjoy my daily content where I expose those who did this to us. https://t.co/jATVUrYpDV

Saved - October 17, 2025 at 5:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion thread centers on Bird Flu, gain-of-function vaccines, and pandemic prep. Participants share links on patents, UN/WHO plans, and vaccine agendas, arguing for rapid, forced vaccination, digital IDs, and biosurveillance. Claims surface about RFK-era staffing, MRNA in food, and 6G/IoBNT bio-cyber integration. Repeated themes: alleged pretext for control, permanent vaccine passports, and a push toward a DigitalID system tied to national security and governance.

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@DrSchollsMDPhd @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @BanounHelene @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational Birdflu vax being fast tracked before election video

@TheRedactedInc - Redacted

BREAKING! Next Pandemic Plans EXPOSED before Election, Bird Flu Vax Being Fast-Tracked | Redacted

@BanounHelene - Hélène Banoun

@ALMAlienLivesM1 @DrSchollsMDPhd @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381926731_Avian_flu_and_the_predicted_pandemic_gain_of_function_vaccines

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BanounHelene @ALMAlienLivesM1 @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational Patents Related to #Birdflu @drloveariyana below does excellent Patent Research & Quickly too on all things Pandemic & Vaccines. I recall seeing a substack by her on more patent materials for Birdflu if she has it please 🙏 post below

@drloveariyana - Dr. Ariyana Love

THREAD: The #BirdFlu is 100% man made! H5N1, H5N7, H7N9 influenza A (H5) “bird flu” & (H7) are patented vaccine bioweapons. 💉 Bird Flu is created by injecting (vaccinating) animals with bioweapons. 👉The H5 patent contains SEQ ID NO 1, a parasite vector used to encode…

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @BarbarasBack @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational ELON NEURALINK VACCINE - NEURALACE Injectable Neuralink creates AI🧠Brain layer thru veins & arteries, perhaps🤔partly rely on bodies energy heart sys(heart issues) &/or his Starl1nk. Biotech Analyst @Kingston_Truth wondered if in CovidVaccine on a show

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes envisioning an AI layer that sits above the cortex as a third layer, to work symbiotically with the brain just as the cortex does with the limbic system. This digital layer would merge with the rest of the brain in a similar cooperative way. Speaker 1 asks whether this augmentation would be surgically inserted or bred. Speaker 0 explains the fundamental limitation is input/output, noting that humans are already cyborgs through our digital presence in emails, social media, and other online activities, which grant “superpowers” via computers and phones. The goal of merging with digital intelligence is to eliminate the IO constraint, achieved through some sort of direct cortical interface. Speaker 1 asks about the term “neural lace,” and Speaker 0 confirms, calling it a neural lace and clarifying that it is not Google Glass. The concept involves an interface directly with cortical neurons. Speaker 1 questions whether this requires surgery; Speaker 0 responds that it does not necessarily, suggesting one could access the brain through the veins and arteries, which provide a road to all neurons since neurons are heavy energy users and require high blood flow. Therefore, vascular routes are a natural pathway. Speaker 1 remarks that this still sounds like some kind of surgery, and Speaker 0 agrees, acknowledging that a surgical approach is possible but not strictly required. They discuss inserting something into the jugular to access the brain network, with Speaker 0 noting the carotid as part of the route (referred to as “carb” in the dialogue).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have an AI layer. If you think of like you've got your limbic system, your cortex, and then a digital layer, a sort of a third layer above the cortex that could work well and symbiotically with you. I mean just as your cortex works symbiotically with your limbic system, your sort of a third digital layer could work symbiotically with the rest Speaker 1: of This is something that's surgically inserted or bred into the species or what? Speaker 0: The fundamental limitation is input output. So we already have we're already a cyborg. It's just that, I mean, you have a digital version of yourself or partial version of yourself online in the form of your emails and your social media and all the things that you do. And you have basically superpowers in in that with your computer and your phone and and the Speaker 1: mostly, Speaker 0: effectively merging in a symbiotic way with digital intelligence revolves around eliminating the IO constraint. So it's it'd be some sort of direct cortical interface. Speaker 1: And you called it a neural lace? Speaker 0: Neural lace. Yeah. It's totally not Google Glass. Right? No. I'm talking about something So, which if you wear it or No. I mean it would be I mean I mean there are a few ways to approach this, but some sort of interface directly with your cortical neurons particularly. Speaker 1: But doesn't that apply surgical insertion? Speaker 0: Not necessarily. You could go through the veins and arteries, because that that provides a complete roadway to all of your neurons. Your neurons are very heavy users of energy, so they need high blood flow. So you automatically, with your veins and arteries, have a road network to your neurons. Speaker 1: Still some kind of surgery, Speaker 0: right? Yes. But you could insert something basically into the jugular and have it gets to the carb. Speaker 1: It sounds really easy Speaker 0: and

@jorgeluis_svh - Jorge Luis

@DrSchollsMDPhd @Incrementallog1 @fear2022 @Anti5GWarrior @NeBirgitta @grandbernard1 @Stuckelberger @BarbarasBack @connerben @Jikkyleaks @KristieIushkova @CorinneNokel @Yohmini2 @sophiadahl1 @DreaHumphrey @AllBiteNoBark88 @AdhesionsOrg @CanningPharm @zeee_media @Artemisfornow @drloveariyana @liz_churchill10 @jasondeandc @Double_Christ @naomirwolf @ganaha_masako @yasufumi06 @stop_mRNA_com @DrAnaMihalcea @Doctor_I_am_The @Parsifaler @RealDrJaneRuby @carrie_madej @sasha_latypova @lqcnternational @ShabnamPalesaMo @BusyDrT @Kingston_Truth @la5acolumna @DrJackKruse @DJSpeicher @Kevin_McKernan @SuperBen78 @MelissaMcAtee92 @stkirsch @CShoemakerMD @Eleventhstar1 @CelestialReport @PSardonicus Neuralink es una tapadera. La realidad es que lo introducen por venas y arterias. 👇 https://odysee.com/@Plan-pandemia:a/Elon-Musk-inteligencia-artificial-en-neuronas:7

Elon Musk: inteligencia artificial en neuronas a través de venas ELON MUSK: INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL EN LAS NEURONAS A TRAVÉS DE LAS VENAS. Elon Musk está hablando de la posibilidad de tener una capa digital encima del neocórtex, sin cirugía, introducida en el torre... odysee.com

@BarbarasBack - Barbara - Shining a Light

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational (3) TPV Sean on X: "Pilot Testifies Bill Gates Spraying 'Air Vax' mRNA on Humanity via Chemtrails ✈️ Gates is spraying airborne mRNA on dense urban populations & rural areas with low 💉 uptake according to a commercial airlines pilot..." / X

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a set of coordinated claims about airborne dissemination of biological and chemical agents, including mRNA, through so-called chemtrails, with Bill Gates portrayed as a central figure. - Bill Gates is allegedly spraying airborne mRNA on dense urban populations and rural areas with low vaccine uptake through chemtrails operations in North America and Europe. The new airborne mRNA, known as AirVax, is described as designed to deliver the vaccine right into people’s lungs, bypassing injections and consent. A commercial airline pilot, speaking anonymously as John, asserts thousands of people in the US and Europe are involved in chemtrails, with pilots, ex-military personnel, engineers, and air traffic controllers aware of, or complicit in, the scheme. He notes aircraft are modified for chemtrail work, sometimes not appearing on flight radar (ghost planes), and claims NDAs prevent disclosure. - The channel frames the current discussion as part of a broader revelation that the global elite have been secretly spraying chemtrails for decades, using media to frame climate predictions as a cover story. It claims declassified documents prove the real genocidal intent behind the chemtrail agenda and ties this to climate change narratives as misdirection. - Historical Cold War-era testing is discussed: during the 1950s and 1960s, the US military allegedly conducted secret tests on unsuspecting residents, including in Saint Louis. A local sociologist, Lisa Martino Taylor, is cited as preparing to publicize findings about ultra-secret experiments. In Corpus Christi, Texas, the tests reportedly used planes to drop chemicals; in Saint Louis, sprayers were placed on buildings and station wagons, with city officials kept in the dark. The tests allegedly sprayed zinc cadmium sulfide with radioactive particles near the Pruitt Igoe housing complex, affecting tens of thousands of residents, many of whom were under 12. The stated cover story was smoke screens against Russian attack; Martino Taylor contends the real purpose was sinister and ethically and medically in violation of codes and policies. - Fast-forward to 2024, the narrative moves to claims of ongoing inhalation of toxic chemicals and airborne mRNA in North America and Europe. Pilot John alleges widespread involvement, with aviation personnel fearing for their lives and noting that many pilots are ex-military, with NDAs and dangerous goods declarations governing hazardous substances. They describe “camtaro” planes and unregistered flights that avoid radar, and maintain that the public is kept in the dark about these operations. The assertion is made that the public cannot be informed, as those involved believe chemtrails serve the “public interest” by fighting climate change, a rationale used to justify the work. - The speakers discuss what is allegedly sprayed: graphene oxide, aluminum oxide, barium, and mRNA. They claim mRNA is a military-developed product, with cover stories about Moderna and Pfizer used as fronts; the Pentagon is said to be involved in administering mRNA to the masses. They claim tests in Europe used mass spectrometry to analyze residues on cars and windows during heavy chemtrail pollution, with disturbing results. Aluminum and other substances are said to affect bees, crops, and human health, with claims that aluminum exposure is linked to autism and Alzheimer’s disease. - The discourse invokes broader depopulation and control theories, referencing the Georgia Guidestones, World Economic Forum, and Agenda 2030. It links Gates Foundation funding to geoengineering contracts and asserts Gates is intent on disseminating mRNA widely and even lacing the food supply with mRNA. The speakers urge continued scrutiny of global elites’ actions. - The transcript includes promotional content and sponsorship messages, including claims about precious metals investments, a self-directed IRA with Colonial Metals Group, and Livermedic’s Leaky Gut Repair, as part of the narrative. - Overall, the speakers frame these claims as evidence of a coordinated global conspiracy involving government, military, and private interests to weaponize the atmosphere, control populations, and depopulate, with Bill Gates repeatedly named as a key player.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Gates is spraying airborne mRNA on dense urban populations and rural areas with low vaccine uptake, according to a commercial airline pilot who has come forward to blow the whistle on chemtrails operations in North America and Europe. As the globalist elite find it harder to convince humanity to submit to COVID mRNA shots and endless boosters, they're having to find deceitful new ways to force their mRNA on us. According to pilots familiar with the scheme, the new airborne mRNA known as AirVax is designed to deliver the vaccine right into people's lungs, bypassing the need for injections and the need for consent. Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already. Join the People's Voice locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel, and check out the brand new free speech forum at community.thepeople'svoice.tv. In the last twelve months, the mainstream media has begun preparing the public for the revelation that the global elite have been secretly spraying chemtrails on the population for decades. This is a slow reveal, and the elites are using the media to spread their doom mongering climate predictions in the hopes that the public will be terrified into accepting chemtrails as a solution to climate change. However, the climate change narrative is nothing more than a cover story. How do we know? Declassified documents released decades ago proved the real genocidal intent of the government's top secret chemtrail agenda. Speaker 1: This next story is so unbelievable, we didn't think it could possibly be true. But after receiving thousands of records and declassified reports from the army, it's confirmed that during the Cold War, the United States military conducted secret tests on unsuspecting people in the city of Saint Louis. A local sociologist will make her findings public tomorrow, but she spoke first to the I team's Lisa Zignan. Speaker 2: Lisa Martino Taylor's life work has been to uncover details of the army's ultra secret military experiments carried out in St. Louis and other cities during the nineteen fifties and sixties. Speaker 3: This study was secretive for a reason. They didn't have volunteers stepping up and saying, yeah, I'll breathe zinc cadmium sulfide with radioactive particles. Speaker 2: These army archive pictures show how the tests were done in Corpus Christi, Texas in the nineteen sixties. In Texas, planes were used to drop the chemical, but in Saint Louis, the army placed chemical sprayers on buildings and station wagons. City officials were kept in the dark about the tests. The Cold War cover story was that the army was testing smoke screens to protect cities from a Russian attack. The truth, according to Martino Taylor, was much more sinister. Speaker 3: It's pretty shocking. The level of duplicity and secrecy, clearly, they went to great lengths to deceive people. Speaker 0: Some things don't change. The government is still going to great lengths to deceive the people. Only now the smokescreen is climate change rather than the cold war. Speaker 2: The greatest concentration of this compound was sprayed near the Pruitt Igoe housing complex just south of Downtown Saint Louis. It was home to 10,000 low income people, and an estimated seventy percent were under the age of 12. Martino Taylor claims they all unknowingly inhaled this compound morning, noon, and night so the government could measure its effects on their lungs. Speaker 3: So this was in violation of all medical ethics, all international codes, and the military's own policy at that time. Speaker 0: Fast forward to 2024, and everybody in North America and most of Europe is inhaling toxic chemicals and airborne mRNA, according to whistleblower pilots who reveal that governments are working hand in glove with the military and private contractors to operate the top secret operations. According to one commercial airline pilot who's been doing in-depth research into chemtrails, there are thousands of people in The US, and as many again across Europe, who are involved in the business of chemtrails, most of whom have some idea of what they're doing. Speaking anonymously with his voice digitized to protect his identity, the pilot who asked to be called John explains that many people within the aviation industry are fearing for their lives. Speaker 4: Everybody working in aviation understands the stakes are high and whistleblowers get whacked. They don't last long. The stakes are too high. You see what happened to that Boeing guy? All he did was try and talk about safety, cutting corners, basic things. Try talking about chemtrails. It won't last a minute. Everyone working on chemtrails in any capacity understands this. There are thousands of these people and none of them are talking. You've got the pilots, many of them are military or ex military, and they know how to keep quiet. Then you've got commercial planes involved too. These guys have signed NDAs, and they understand the gravity of what they're doing. They have to understand what they're doing because they sign dangerous goods declarations whenever there are hazardous chemicals on board. These commercial planes are modified with conversions that are easy to roll on, roll off. But these pilots, yeah, you know you know what they know what they're doing. The same goes for engineers and air travel controllers. They can't not know. Camtaro planes don't appear on flight radar. A lot of people have noticed this while watching a plane leave grid like patterns above their houses in the countryside. There's no trace of the plane on flight radar websites, ghost planes. So air travel control and the government and military are all involved. Since they weren't, an unregistered plane not appearing on flight radars would be taken out within minutes by air force. You have to realize there are thousands of people involved, but a lot of these people believe chemtrails are in the public interest. They've been told by their superiors that they're fighting climate change. They're making the world a better place and that they are doing what's necessary. But the public can't find out under any circumstances. So these guys, they think they're doing something glamorous and exciting, like working for the CIA or military intelligence. They think they're James Bond. Speaker 0: In reality, these misguided souls following orders from above are responsible for spraying densely populated urban areas with highly toxic and carcinogenic chemicals, including, as John explains, airborne mRNA. The globalists are trying to make us all poorer and destroy what's left of the economy. The Biden regime is following all of the w f dick tax to the letter. They literally want you to own nothing and pretend to be happy. It's no joke. That's why I recently decided to put a lot of my own savings into precious metals, gold and silver. I don't trust the banks. I don't trust governments, and I don't trust big tech with my hard earned money. Why? Because the handful of people that I do trust to give me financial advice, Max Kaiser, for instance, have all said that gold is the best insurance against inflation and the stock market. So I decided to partner up with our sponsor, Colonial Metals Group. They helped me set up a self directed IRA where I have access to all of my assets, no matter what restrictions the government impose on everybody else. Let the team of experts at CMG help you protect your family's future. And viewers of this channel are being given an exclusive offer. Click on the link below this video or call the 800 number and you'll receive a safe and up to $10,000 in free silver. This offer is exclusive to viewers of The People's Voice. The number to call is (888) 351-2043. That's (888) 351-2043, Or go to colonialmetalsgroup.com/tpv. As Science Translational Medicine's editor Courtney Melo explained in his new article, newly developed airborne vaccines can be used to disseminate mRNA widely and rapidly without relying on injections or the need to seek consent. Speaker 4: We've been looking into this because we started hearing reports from colleagues that something had changed in the storage facilities on board, and they weren't signing hazardous goods forms anymore. In The US, the military is spraying mRNA. From what we understand, mRNA is being sprayed in remote areas and cities where vaccine uptake is lagging. In Europe, we hear that it's a combination of military and commercial planes. Many of these guys don't understand what they're doing, but we know that in The US, the military has been spraying chemicals on populations for decades now. Our research suggests that mRNA is a military developed product, and the cover story involving Moderna and Pfizer was just for cover. In reality, mRNA was a DOD and deep state product made in conjunction with the globalists around ten years ago. The project warp speed, eight month production schedule, that was all Kabuki theater. Part of the grand plan to brainwash the masses, force them into mass formation psychosis. So it's no surprise the Pentagon is involved in administering mRNA to the masses. Speaker 0: What else are they spraying? As John explains, they've done tests in Europe using mass spectrometry to analyze the residue that settles on cars and windows during periods of heavy chemtrail pollution. The results from Europe are disturbing to say the least. Speaker 4: It's important to understand how toxic this stuff is. We're talking about graphene oxide, aluminum oxide, barium, and mRNA. These are some of the most toxic metals in the universe. I have young children. To think they're being slowly poisoned with this stuff, when I saw the results on these tests, I became radicalized. There's no other word for it. A fire was lit inside me. I've been researching ever since, and this is very dangerous, but I quickly realized that I'm not the only one in the industry, far from the only one, who wants to expose this. Speaker 0: Chemtrails aren't the only crimes against our children and crimes against humanity. They are also crimes against the natural world. The chemicals from the chemtrails land on plants and get into the grass which animals are then eating. When aluminum gets into the soil, it slowly kills everything. Aluminum promotes autism in children and Alzheimer's disease in adults. They've sprayed so much aluminum in chemtrails around the world that bees have elevated levels of aluminum, and they're starting to develop a form of Alzheimer's. When bees stop fertilizing flowers and pollinating our crops, we'll be totally reliant on the elite for our food. Speaker 4: There's a theory that the real goal of spraying chemtrails is to convert the atmosphere into plasma for weather modification, scalar mind control technology, geotectonic warfare, and other nefarious uses. From what I can see, and my colleagues agree with me, it's all part of a control apparatus. The root cause is the depopulation agenda. This is at the heart of everything. If you've been listening to the crap that's been coming out of the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, these sorts of places, you can connect the dots yourself. Speaker 0: You won't be surprised to hear that Bill Gates is a key player in the plot to deliver airborne mRNA to the masses without their consent. Speaker 4: There are a lot of companies that apply for geoengineering contracts. And when we've looked into their funding, it always leads back to the Gates Foundation. From what we understand, Gates is fanatical about disseminating mRNA far and wide. He's also developing ways to lace the food supply with mRNA. So we're experiencing a two pronged attack at the moment. Speaker 0: This information, while shocking, should not come as a surprise to anybody who's been paying attention. Doctor William Diegel wonders almost twenty years ago that the government and military were engaged in spraying operations and using climate change as a smokescreen. Speaker 5: Chemtrails. And, chemtrails by way, barium salts are in chemtrails. They are 10,000 times more toxic to your nervous system than lead. They contain mycobacteria, viruses, pseudomonas florentis bacteria, human plasma. Wonder what human plasma is doing in chemtrails. And this is not by conjecture. I did a lot of research before I'd ever say this, but these chemtrails are nasty. And there's three reasons for chemtrails. The first is they and I talked to my NSA buddies at Fort Carson, Peterson Air Force Base at Buckley, where I was actually their doctor taking care of the pilots flying and spraying the chemtrails. So I know it's real. If anybody says it's not real, they're full of it. Okay. Because I'm a whistleblower on the inside, it's not open for discussion. And my NSA buddies told me 95% of them told me they were up there trying to spray to reflect the sun out to stop global warming. So most of them are dumb enough to believe that garbage, Okay? And also in the chemtrails, and there's a link directly that Jeff Francis found out, I'm going to have Doctor. Staninger and Doctor. Carju on in about a week on my radio show. And I've done some investigations and there's very solid evidence now that Morgallons is caused by a silicon based nanomachine life form that does not originate on planet Earth. Is that not interesting? This is a silicon based life form that is intelligent like bees or ants and it fights back. Conversion of the atmosphere into a plasma for weather modification, geotectonic warfare, scalar mind control technologies, the Woodpecker, which has been discovered back in the 1970s, HARP, the Tetris system in The United Kingdom, Gwen towers in The United States and the Iridium satellite system connected to the cell towers and the smart highways is all based on not only sending out a signal to track you, but Nokia, which is one of the leading cell companies, has figured out a new way to cut down the need for increasing amount of signal by three to five times as many cell phones in the same signal area by beaming the signal directly to you. But they can also besides the cell signal, they can actually send a bio coded signal to your DNA to affect your physiology and insert thoughts into your mind. And they have this technology today. Speaker 0: The Georgia Guidestones told us that the global elite want to reduce the population to 500,000,000. Since then, a procession of globalist ghouls, often speaking from their safe space in Davos, have made the same pronouncements about eugenics and depopulation. The elite's strange code of ethics requires that they tell us what they're going to do to us using occult code and symbols. The problem for the elites is that we have cracked the code, and we can see what they are doing to us. We understand the real purpose of agenda twenty thirty and their so called sustainable development goals. We understand that when they say they are spraying the skies to fight climate change, they actually have far more nefarious goals in mind. We also understand that barium, aluminium, and graphene oxide should not be injected into our children, nor should they be sprayed all over us from a great height. Here at the People's Voice, we are determined to continue holding the global elite to account for their crimes against humanity, but we need your help. Subscribe to the channel, tell your friends and family about us, and join the People's Voice locals community. I hope to see you there. Today's sponsor is Livermedic. If you think the supplements you are getting from big box retailers are doing you any good, think again. Did you know that most of the retailers in America are owned and controlled by the same handful of companies that control everything? But we have a choice. Livermedic's leaky gut repair is aimed at the millions of people suffering from all forms of digestive discomfort. Their safe and efficacious natural product is physician grade with no toxic fillers. It coats while repairing the digestive lining. Best of all, unlike Big Pharma's offerings, it actually works. Join me and millions of other Americans who are voting with our dollars by supporting an American company that truly cares about our health. Save up to 15% on a three month supply by using our code PEOPLE's VOICE by visiting livermedic.com/step/leakygutspecial or by clicking on the link below this video. Take back control of your health, protect your family from the global elite, and hit them where it really hurts. Visit livermedic.com/step/leakygutspecial, or click the link below this video to find out more.

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational BIRDFLU & NUCLEAR WAR US GOV PLANNING DOCS By @OdessaOrlewicz #avianflu #H5N1 #birdflu #war #nuclear #ww3 #us #USA #senate #Congress #news #breaking #breakingnews #uspoli #mil @AaronSiriSG

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @DrAseemMalhotra @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @lilianazeladaru @LqcRicardo @DrLuisServinde1 @lqcnternational @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG TIN - USED IN SOLDERING ELECTRONICS LAB FINDS IN COVID INJECTION CLOTS - Huge amounts discovered by Mass Spectroscopy of the Soft Actuators used in IOT that change shape & ppl erroneously calling blood clots in those injected💉with the covid bioweapon

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"We've run [mass spectrometry] on these clots. They don't look like normal clots...There's a ton of tin for some reason..." Medical doctor, tribal practitioner, and board-certified indigenous medicine practitioner Dr. Andrew Zywiec (@AndrewZywiecMD) describes for Dr. Joseph Sansone (@PhdSansone) the strange composition of the now-infamous white, fibrous clots appearing in the bodies of COVID-"vaccinated" people. Echoing what Dr. Shankara Chetty (@ShankaraChetty) has said previously, Zyweic notes there is "a ton of tin" in the clots. The medical doctor also notes that the clots don't have fibrin or thrombin, "which are normal things that you would see in a normal coagulation cascade." Transcription of clip: "The clots that are being formed, we've run mass spec on these clots. They don't look like normal clots. They don't have the same composition. They don't have fibrin. They don't have thrombin, which are normal things that you would see in a normal coagulation cascade. They have, instead, all the fibrinogen chains, alpha, beta, and gamma. They have them in a strange differential where it's not one to one to one. It's about 36 to 16 to four, by ratios. "They're aberrantly cross-linked by sulfide bonds. There's a ton of tin for some reason. I don't know why there's tin in there, but there's a ton of tin in there and a ton of phosphorus. And the spike protein is actually coated in GlcNAc, which is a phosphate donor. So that might explain all the phosphorus if it's providing energetics or in some in some way by cleaving or creating phosphate bonds. So I think that that's a big problem because that's a slow progression of coagulopathy that's, I think, narrowing the lumens of the vascular system, which is contributing to some some of the organ failure that we're seeing, some of the neurological symptomatology that we're seeing, some of the fatigue and things of that nature."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The clots being formed, we've run mass spectrometry on these clots. They don't look like normal clots. They don't have the same composition. They don't have fibrin. They don't have thrombin, which are normal things you would see in a normal coagulation cascade. They have, instead, all the fibrinogen chains—alpha, beta, and gamma. They have them in a strange differential where it's not one-to-one-to-one; it's about 36 to 16 to 4 by ratios. They're aberrantly cross-linked by sulfide bonds. There's a ton of tin for some reason. I don't know why there's tin in there, but there's a ton of tin in there and a ton of phosphorus. And the spike protein is actually coated in GLIKNAK, which is a phosphate donor. So that might explain all the phosphorus if it's providing the energetics or in some way by cleaving or creating phosphate bonds. So I think that that's a big problem because that's a slow progression of coagulopathy that's, I think, narrowing the lumens of the vascular system, which is contributing to some of the organ failure that we're seeing, some of the neurological symptomatology that we're seeing, some of the fatigue, and things of that nature. And then finally, the spike protein is shown to produce—it’s shown to induce misfolding of proteins and actually
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The clots that are being formed, we've run we've run mass spec on these clots. They don't look like normal clots. They don't have they don't have the same composition. They don't have fibrin. They don't have thrombin, which are normal things that you would see in a normal coagulation cascade. They have, instead, all the fibrinogen chains, alpha, beta, and gamma. They have them in in a strange differential where it's not one to one to one. It's about 36 to 16 to four by ratios. They're aberrantly cross linked by sulfide bonds. There's a ton of tin for some reason. I don't know why there's tin in there, but there's a ton of tin in there and a ton of phosphorus. And the spike protein is actually coated in in GLIKNAK, which is a phosphate donor. So that might explain all the phosphorus if it's providing the energetics or in some in some way by cleaving or creating phosphate bonds. So I think that that's a big problem because that's a slow that's a slow progression of coagulopathy that's, I think, narrowing the lumens of the the vascular system, which is contributing to, you know, some of the some of the organ failure that we're seeing, some of the neurological symptomatology that we're seeing, some of the fatigue, and and things of that nature. And then finally, the spike protein is shown to produce. It's shown to induce misfolding of proteins and actually

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG BIRDFLU DC SUMMIT PLAN PRIOR 2 ELECTION - Pol|ce & 1st Responders Mass Vaccination,Enforce Quarantine,Control Social Unrest & Disorder Not surprisingly in US Capitol Washington DC b4 Election.For Gov Personnel Oct 2-4/24 #Election2024 @laralogan @annvandersteel @AllBiteNoBark88

@BarbarasBack - Barbara - Shining a Light

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @AllBiteNoBark88 Redacted on X: "☎️ Big Pharma execs are gathering for a grand summit in D.C. to sound the alarm on another looming #BirdFlu #pandemic. Brace yourselves for the sequel nobody asked for! 🤯🦆🐦‍⬛🦇 #BigPharma https://t.co/OgL5oRuODX" / X

Video Transcript AI Summary
The segment centers on the claim that government officials and the biopharma industry are redoing a “bird flu” scare with a high-profile summit in Washington, DC, while pushing vaccines through emergency authorization processes. Key points and claims - BARDA granted Moderna 176 million dollars to accelerate development of an emergency bird flu vaccine. The hosts emphasize that Moderna has never had a product reach the market through standard channels, implying prior success relied on emergency authorizations during the COVID pandemic. - The hosts assert that current bird flu is not contagious between humans and that treatments exist; they question how vaccine development can anticipate mutations “best guess” scenarios. They frame this as a repeat of the COVID playbook: using emergency use authorization to push a vaccine. - They note that the US and EU are reportedly using emergency orders to procure bird flu vaccines from CSL Securus, which they allege is funded and advised by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. - A three-day “International Bird Flu Summit” is described as taking place in early October in Washington, DC, with speakers and breakout sessions. They show the summit website and list breakout topics, including mass fatality management, fatality operations, continuity of government planning, operating with absenteeism, business continuity, remote work policies, and travel policy. - The hosts stress that the breakout sessions cover topics like “mass fatality management planning,” “continuity of government planning,” and “remote work policies,” suggesting the agenda extends beyond purely clinical topics into civil preparedness and governance. - They claim the summit is real and not a conspiracy, showing the conference site, sessions, and a contact phone line. They also note that attendees can pay for sessions (the price cited around $625 to attend) and vendors can participate. - The hosts recount an attempted inquiry to the Bird Flu Summit hotline. A caller (Clayton) asks why the summit is being held now, given bird flu’s long history and purported lack of human fatalities in the US. The response from the hotline staffer is described as evasive; she states this is the organization’s first year doing the conference, mentions “global transfer” and 13 viruses, but does not provide concrete virus-specific evidence to address the questions. The caller reports the staffer hung up after questions about evidence and the focus on population control and remote work. - They reference Dr. Peter McCullough’s stance that bird flu could become a pandemic and that authorities used fear during prior outbreaks. - Dr. Kelly Victory is cited arguing for available and effective medications to treat bird flu (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, steroids) and suggesting that if authorities block these treatments in the name of vaccine deployment, people will resist. They imply mRNA vaccines are being positioned as central to the response, pointing to Forbes reporting on Moderna’s involvement in an mRNA bird flu shot. - The hosts tease future coverage, mentioning Max Jones and Unlimited Hangout, connecting the discussion to the broader narrative that biopharmaceutical interests seek to maintain pandemic preparedness for profit, particularly as profits decline when the public is not in a continual pandemic state. Additional context - The dialogue includes skeptical framing around the necessity and timing of the summit, the motivations behind it, and concerns about surveillance, lockdown readiness, and vaccine deployment. It also notes the appearance of a media segment with a critical stance toward the Bird Flu Summit’s stated goals and potential implications for public health policy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, stop me if you heard this before. Government officials and big pharma are coming together to hold a big summit to warn us all about the coming pandemic. Sound familiar? Yes, it's happening all over again. And we've been covering this story for months here on this show. So this is not a surprise to us at all. Maybe it is to some of you watching for the first time. BARDA just granted $176,000,000 to Moderna to accelerate their development of a bird flu vaccine, an emergency bird flu vaccine. Now you'll recall Moderna never had a successful product ever come to market ever in the history of their company. The only time one of Speaker 1: their products ever made it Speaker 0: to market is because they got to sidestep trials on humans basically, and use emergency use authorization during the pandemic and get us a COVID vaccine. Speaker 2: And again, it's worth reporting that the current bird flu we have now is not contagious from human to human, very rarely. Right? Also, have treatments. So what they're saying is that they are developing a vaccine in case it mutates. Well, how do they know what it's gonna mutate to? It's their best guess. Speaker 0: Sounds like a Sounds Speaker 1: playbook right out of the, the last thing we would dealt with. Speaker 2: Yeah. Seems familiar. Right? Speaker 1: I mean, Speaker 2: what are they doing? Speaker 0: This is not a conspiracy theory at all. I mean, they're literally doing it again using emergency use use authorization to push us a bird flu vaccine. As as we reported before, The US and European Union are also using emergency orders to order bird flu vaccines from the vaccine manufacturer CSL Securus, which is funded and advised, of course, by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Mhmm. And they're about to hold a massive bird flu summit in Washington DC to plan how they're going to carry out this plan. We'll get to that part of the story in a second. But first, these are the same clowns that locked us up and told us to panic about COVID and preparing disease X right now in the next round of lockdowns. As doctor Peter McCullough says, bird flu is their next pandemic, and they're trying to make us scared about it. Speaker 2: Well, do you think that the left could use the bird flu pandemic or something else, like the threat of things similar to rerun the twenty twenty election? Speaker 3: There's no doubt about it. There will be a factitious food shortage. It doesn't need to happen. There's going to be an overplayed threat to both human and veterinary health. I can tell you, we haven't had a single death in The United States in a person from bird flu. It's probably been around for over one hundred years, as indicated in a review by Lysette and colleagues. The current strain of bird flu is not much of a threat to animals. We don't see large number of migratory water birds dead. We haven't seen large numbers of poultry or cattle that have actually died of the disease. So we need to stop intentionally culling or killing healthy animals, which is being promoted by agriculture directors. We need to stop mass PCR testing of the animals by government officials. That doesn't need to happen. And then in no circumstances should we vaccinate the animals or humans for bird flu. Speaker 0: So don't fall for it is what Doctor. Peter McCullough is saying. But that's why they're holding this massive bird flu summit in Washington DC set for early October. Thanks to Cambry for alerting to us on Twitter, by the way. Here's the three day bird flu summit. And guys, this is not some conspiracy theory. Okay? We're gonna show you the actual summit website and their actual sessions that they're holding. So this is their website, the International Bird Flu Summit. As I was working on the story, my son said, what is a summit? What what why are they holding a bird flu summit? And I said, well Speaker 2: Money. Speaker 0: A it's great question. They're charging a lot to go to it by the way. And you can see all the different speakers that are showing up to the bird flu summit. And then I'm going to show you the breakout sessions here. So it's a three day event where you can go to different events and different breakout sessions. I think they have over 20 different breakout sessions. So let's take a look here on your screen. Preparedness in birds, in cattle, prevention and recovery detection in pets and in people, and response in people. So let's go down here and you scroll down on their website. You can all download this if you guys want to and take a look for yourselves. Again, not a conspiracy theory, it's on their website. Here's the first breakout session, mass fatality management planning. So we're all gonna die. Speaker 2: That's positive. Speaker 0: How do we handle that? Direct fatality management tactical operations, you know, when all the bodies start piling up. I'm gonna go to that breakout session. Activate fatality management operations, conduct Speaker 1: more I mean, there's morgue not even Speaker 2: more prevention. It's like when that happens. Speaker 0: Yes. When it happens. How do Speaker 2: we manage it? Speaker 0: How do we go to the morgue? Continue here, I love this. The continuity of government planning. You know, when half the government dies, what do we do about it? Let's go to that session. Strategies for operating with 50% or more absenteeism. So when half the senate dies, half the house of representatives die, what do we do about it? Let's go to that session. Or session number three, business continuity planning. How do we handle making sure that businesses don't collapse and ensures safe travel policies, decision making for reducing our closing operations? And my favorite though, of course, is here at the bottom on your screen, implementing remote work policies and flexible schedule. So yes, remote work, of course, Remote work policies and resource allocation for employees and customer protection. Speaker 2: Of course, when I see safe travel, you know that means no travel. They don't want Speaker 0: you travel. Want you to travel at all. Right? They don't want you get a airplane or anything. Speaker 1: Do you remember event two zero one? Mhmm. Cover that? Like, where it was a simulation? Like, this is like a a printout, a PDF printout of that. Speaker 2: Right? Whereas, look, we've covered bird flu. We've been talking about this for weeks now. And so if actually they had good intentions about making sure that bird flu was safe, well, we know we've talked to several doctors here on the show that said, if you let this play out, then the animal population will kind of adapt to it. And as it stands now, it should not mutate to become transmissible between humans. We should leave it be. We should not, as Doctor. McCullough said, be mass culling and mass testing animals in anticipation of this because it indicates to us that that could be a gain of function manipulation, right? So at well intentioned summit like this would be what? Would be like, okay, we're going to watch bird flu. We're going to what talk about the therapeutics that we currently have, such as things we were not allowed to say, right? We're going to talk about, I don't know, management of information, those kinds of things. I mean, I don't like when the government ever information, but you know what I'm saying. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 2: There there this seems to me a summit in bad faith. Speaker 0: So I decided to give them a call because it turns out on their website, they have a phone number. So the bird flu summit has a has a phone number, and I I had a lot of questions. You know? I have I had a lot of questions for them. So I called them just a short time ago and asked them a few questions, and and here's how it went. So the Bird Flu Summit has a phone number that you can call, and you can ask questions about their agenda and what they plan to do at the Bird Flu Summit in October. So I'm gonna give them a call. Call them the Bird Flu Hotline. Bird Flu Summit Hotline. Speaker 4: Hi, thank you for calling. How can I help you? Speaker 0: Hi, I was trying to reach someone who is perhaps in media relations or who could talk to me about the Bird Flu Summit. Speaker 4: Uh-huh, yeah. Can help you with that. Speaker 0: Name is Clayton. I'm calling from Redacted. We're on a recorded line, if that's okay. I just want to ask you a few questions about the Bird Flu Summit. It's October, right? It's coming up in October? Can you tell me why are they holding a bird flu summit when there it's been around for a hundred years bird flu. There is there's never been a human case of bird flu that has caused a death. Why are there all of these breakout sessions being held at this bird flu summit that are about public control, emergency services, vaccine deployment? Can you talk, can Speaker 1: you tell me about that a little bit? Speaker 4: Alright. So this will be our first year of doing the bird flu. This Speaker 0: is your first year of dealing with the bird flu? Speaker 1: Is that what you said? Speaker 4: Yeah. This is this is our first year doing this conference. Speaker 0: Why why are they holding this for the first time? Why do you think right now there is this need to hold the conference right now? Speaker 4: Okay. Hold on. Speaker 0: Why in 2024 are you holding a bird flu summit? Why now? It's been around for a hundred years. Just curious. Speaker 4: Mhmm. Yeah. I understand. Speaker 0: You want Speaker 1: So I as you all know that Speaker 4: yeah. Because according to our research, this global transfer allows disease to spread. So Speaker 0: According to your research, I'm sorry. What? The global transmission what? Speaker 4: Yeah. So there are 13 virus that are here around Speaker 0: There are certain viruses that are here and around. Is that what you said? Yeah. Okay. But what viruses specifically are here and around? You're talking about bird flu specifically? Speaker 4: Think queen. Speaker 0: Okay. And so among your breakout sessions are sessions about controlling the population, civil unrest. Is there a concern that Americans or Europeans might become upset or unrestful if in fact they are told to stay in their homes. You have another session that specifically focuses on remote work, so people staying home from work. But what evidence is there that people would need to stay home from work, stay in their homes or be locked down because of bird flu? Can you explain that? She hung up on me. Speaker 1: She Speaker 2: hung up. I mean Speaker 0: So I guess you're not allowed. Speaker 2: Okay. Think Speaker 1: that is why you don't outsource customer support. Well, I was Yeah. I guess, well, were you supposed to ask for? Gonna take Speaker 0: a stab in the dark and say she was not media relations. So I think she think Sure. No, it's and it's a Virginia phone number. I'm calling Virginia. I mean, it's Northern Virginia. This is where the summit is. And she, you know, this was the call routed to her. You there's multiple options when you call that phone number. Can talk to multiple people there. Speaker 2: So wait. Let me let me just get this straight, what she said. There are viruses. Speaker 0: That are out there and that there's a concern about around bird flu now. Speaker 2: Around. Around? They are. Speaker 0: They're here. What? And we need to breakout sessions. Speaker 1: She was like the press secretary. She's like going through that book. Speaker 0: Oh, she's like, oh my gosh. Speaker 2: Can help Speaker 0: you. Let me look at let me look through my book here real quick. Speaker 2: You should have just said, wait, I'm about to give you my credit card. I'm gonna register. But first, and then maybe she would have found Speaker 0: some information. I'm gonna sign up for a breakout session. I'd like to be a speaker. By the way, can sign up and be a speaker there if you'd like. And you can pay a lot of money to be a speaker, I guess. It's like $625 to attend. Speaker 1: Can we get a table? Do they have vendors? They Speaker 0: do. You could be a vendor. We should have a redacted table at the Bird Flu Summit. I'm over here and learning. Speaker 2: This is called real journalists questions about bird flu. And I'm just gonna have bullet point and no one's gonna stop at our booth. But I'll have peanut butter cups. Speaker 0: I wasn't being a dick. I was just asking the questions that are on your website. Like why are you having this summit now one hundred years later after this thing has been around? Why when all of these medical professionals are telling us that there's no concern at all, there's nothing to worry about, not even among birds. We have to Speaker 1: cull and kill all of these cattle. Have to kill all of these birds. We have Speaker 0: to lock people down. You're having breakout sessions about literally mass fatalities and deaths. Speaker 2: Chad is saying, let's all call back. Let's all call to. If you do, I wanna know about it. Speaker 1: To be fair, I mean, that's probably the same way a politician would answer it. Well, you know, there's flus around and viruses. There are viruses. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: There's Yeah. There's stuff that's out there and about. Speaker 2: Don't know. Exist. Speaker 0: So doctor Kelly Victory was recently on redacted. She told us the same thing. We already have had ways to treat this, and there's no cause for concern. Speaker 5: The good news is, and the reason that people should not be fearful of this, is that we have every reason to believe that we have safe, readily available, effective medications to treat bird flu. We have every indication, for example, that it will be easily treated by hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, just like COVID was easily treatable with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and steroids. The problem was the powers that be prohibited us from even talking about those things, let alone having ready access to them. If doctors were not impeded from treating patients who had COVID with those medications, the death toll and the suffering would have been far less. So hopefully, if bird flu should become something to be concerned about, if it should begin to be transmitted between human beings and between people who are not in direct contact with infected animals, then hopefully we will be allowed to use the medications that we should be able to use like hydroxychloroquine. If instead they shut those things down in order to foist their mRNA vaccine quote unquote agenda on us, then it's going to be up to people to push back and say, no, we fell for that the last time and we're not falling for it again. Speaker 2: Oh, mRNA vaccine, you say? Is that why The United States is trying to fund the Moderna mRNA bird flu Speaker 5: shot? Shocking. Speaker 2: That was reported on May 30 in Forbes, if you want to see it for yourself. So yes, mRNA is the solution to everything. It's the new tofu, I guess. Goes in everything. Speaker 0: Tomorrow we'll have Max Jones on the show. We're going to talk to him. He's just written a new piece me, in Unlimited Hangout. I don't know how you say that. The website is Unlimited Hangout. So he wrote an article in Unlimited Hangout. Oh, yeah. About about biopharmaceutical complex and the the move to basically keep us permanently in a state of pandemic preparedness. And that's how these big biopharmaceutical companies right now, this is part of their plan because their profits are plummeting now that we're not in a pandemic. So how do you raise their profits? Well, you just create more pandemics and you Yeah. And that's a and you can do that. Youth. Emergency youth office. Speaker 1: Stephen Colbert to do a song about it. Like, that's gonna be we can get more of that. Yeah. All these Nellie Nite hosts doing songs about the birds chub.

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @AllBiteNoBark88 MANDATORY MRNA VACCINATION ALL GOVS SIGNED ONTO by ImmunizationAgenda2030 Requires Everyone to Get Mrna Vaccination No Exemptions Under UN WHO OneHealth. 500 New Vaccines(Mrna DNA etc) by 2030 & Mandatory Pandemics #Birdflu etc support pretext for this @KLVeritas #H5N1 #Avianflu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references the Immunization Agenda 2030, specifically mentioning its Impact Goal Indicators and Targets. They state that, by a date written as "02/1930," there will be "500 new introduced," though the exact subject of what is introduced remains unspecified in the transcript. The speaker ties this to the broader framework of the Immunization Agenda 2030 as part of One Health, and then asserts a claim about exemptions: under this plan, "no man, woman or children, child will have an exemption." The speaker immediately contrasts this with a claim about the elite, stating that "the elite will have an exemption because they wouldn't do this to their bodies." The speaker emphasizes a contrast between the general population and elites, suggesting that ordinary people will be compelled to comply. Further, the speaker asserts that, for those who survive to the proposed point, they will be subjected to coercive measures with the phrase "will be forcibly" applied. The speaker then presents a stark interpretation of the language used in the plan, saying that the statement amounts to "no one left behind is how they put it, which really means no one left alone. One left alive." This phrasing is used to convey the speaker’s reading of the policy as implying extreme outcomes for individuals who comply or are affected by the program. The speaker then shifts to a meta-commentary about the document, noting the source of the material. They say, "Just want to bring up that chart right now, the Implementing the Immunization Agenda 2030 document." They identify the document as originating from or involving multiple institutions: "It's the United Nations. It's the World Health Assembly," followed by a reference to a prominent philanthropic-linked influence, "the Bill and Melinda Gates Immunization Agenda 2030." Throughout, the speaker foregrounds a sense of urgency and controversy surrounding the Immunization Agenda 2030, presenting a sequence of claims about exemptions, coercive implementation, and the involvement of international organizations and influential actors. The overall cadence emphasizes a perceived discrepancy between the stated goals and the individuals’ alleged experiences or rights, framed within the larger context of international health governance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Immunization Agenda 2030 Impact Goal Indicators and Targets lays out that by 02/1930, there will be 500 new introduced. And under the Immunization Agenda 02/1930, which is part of One Health, no man, woman or children, child will have an exemption. Well, of course, the elite will have an exemption because they wouldn't do this to their bodies. But you and I, those of us who survive to that point, will be forcibly no one left behind is how they put it, which really means no one left alone. One left alive. Just want to bring up I just want to bring up that chart right now, the Implementing the Immunization Agenda 2030 document. It's the United Nations. It's the World Health Assembly, the Bill and Melinda Gates Immunization Agenda 2030

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel Birdflu in UN WHO 10yr plan prior to 2020 for yrs.Plan calls 4"Major Infectious Disease Crisis"2020 Covid yr1.PreText 4 #ImmunizationAgenda2030 by same UN WHO OneHealth Plan above @DrDMartinWorld @Stuckelberger explain UN WHO BillGates Prosecutorial Immunity #H5N1 #AvianFlu

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a consensus that appears in the World Health Organization’s ten-year plan, which has been in place for a long time. The plan states that people should prepare for the coming ten years because a major infectious crisis is anticipated. In other words, the plan foretells that over the next decade there will be a significant infectious-health emergency. The speaker notes that “this was year 1,” indicating that the current year is the first year of that ten-year horizon outlined by the plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Er groot. Ja, daar is wel consensus over. Dat staat ook al tijd lang in het tienjarenplan van de Wereld Gezondheids Organisatie. Het tienjarenplan van de Wereld Gezondheids Organisatie. Dus daar stond: bereid je voor de komende 10 jaar, er gaat een grote infectiecrisis komen. Nou, dit was jaar 1.

@BarbarasBack - Barbara - Shining a Light

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel http://www.stopworldcontrol.com

Top experts are warning humanity for a world dictatorship. Will we listen? World leading experts sound the alarm about the official agenda of world domination by the United Nations. Please listen! See the details here... stopworldcontrol.com

@DrSchollsMDPhd - DrScholls

@BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @ChristinaPushaw @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @tpvsean @jorgeluis_svh @raoult_didier @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @Kevin_McKernan @LqcRicardo @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel WHO Virologist "Yes,this(2nd Pandemic (#Birdflu))has been in the WHO 10yr "plan" 4 sometime(prior to 2020 interview)That "Plan" says that there will be a major infectious disease crisis" @MarionKoopmans WHO Virologist how long has 2nd Pandemic #H5N1 #AvianFlu been in 10yr plan?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this exchange, the speakers reference the World Health Organization’s ten-year plan. The first speaker states that the plan has long warned: “for the coming 10 years, there will be a large infectious disease crisis,” and notes that “this was year 1.” The second speaker adds that the aim is to prepare and help, should a second pandemic occur, and asserts that, based on years of the speakers’ discussions, “the chance that a second pandemic comes is very large.” The first speaker reiterates that there is consensus and that the plan has anticipated a major infectious disease crisis over the decade, emphasizing that the warning has been a longstanding part of the plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dat staat ook al tijd lang in het tienjarenplan van de Wereld Gezondheidsorganisatie. Het tienjarenplan van de Wereld Gezondheidsorganisatie. Dus daar stond: Bereid je voor, de komende 10 jaar, er gaat een grote infectieziektecrisis komen. Nou, was jaar 1. Speaker 1: Niet werk je al om ons in ieder geval op weg te helpen mocht er een tweede pandemie komen, maar eigenlijk als ik goed volg wat je al jaren zegt, dan is de kans dat een tweede pandemie komt heel erg groot. Speaker 0: Ja, daar is wel consensus over. Het staat ook al tijd lang in het tienjarenplan van de WG. Dus daar stond: bereid je voor, de komende 10 jaar, er gaat een grote infectieziekte crisis komen. Nou, dit was jaar 1.

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel So almost everyone rushing 2b in RFKs new Admin under Trump.If know RFK or someone who knows his team get resume in,make the call 📞 even if outside US like Jess from Canada🇨🇦 @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @DiblasiLorena

@JesslovesMJK - Jessica Rose 🤙

Already sent my CV. I really did. @RobertKennedyJr

@BryceMLipscomb - Bryce Lipscomb🗽

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨: @RobertKennedyJr just announced that President Donald Trump has asked him to lead the reorganization of @CDC, @NIH, @US_FDA, & parts of the @USDA.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that Trump has asked him to reorganize the federal health agencies whose portfolios affect human health, specifically the CDC, NIH, FDA, and some USDA agencies. The goals are to clean up corruption, end conflicts of interest, and return these agencies to their “rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine.” He adds a aim to end the chronic disease epidemic in the country, with a specific request to measurably reduce chronic disease in children within two years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies, the agencies that have a portfolio that affects human health, which is CDC, NIH, c d FDA, as well as some of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture. He's asked me to clean up the corruption, number one. Number two, end the conflicts of interest, return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine, and to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And he's asked me specifically to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years. Okay. So

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @DiblasiLorena I know that Dr Malone is seeking high up position at FDA heading it or Parr of it. Dr. Richard Fleming Secretary of HHS. No idea what position Jessica Rose is going for above

@BryceMLipscomb - Bryce Lipscomb🗽

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨: @RobertKennedyJr just announced that President Donald Trump has asked him to lead the reorganization of @CDC, @NIH, @US_FDA, & parts of the @USDA.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies, the agencies that have a portfolio that affects human health, which is CDC, NIH, c d FDA, as well as some of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture. He’s asked me to clean up the corruption, number one. He’s asked me to end the conflicts of interest, return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine, and to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And he’s asked me specifically to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years. Okay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies, the agencies that have a portfolio that affects human health, which is CDC, NIH, c d FDA, as well as some of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture. He's asked me to clean up the corruption, number one. Number two, end the conflicts of interest, return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine, and to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And he's asked me specifically to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years. Okay. So

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrSchollsMDPhd @BarbarasBack @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Hope u don't Think we're just going to.leave this as is - Things r Never Going Back to Normal..they tried to Wire us up,Genetically Engineer GMO us,Maim & Kill Us Things r coming down,govts,all ags & left/right parties,courts/military/law Enfmt. It was always a charade @DrNagase

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that returning to normal is impossible because “these people invented gene therapy, and they tried to lie to the world to make us all take it.” They claim that those responsible “used gain of function, which is bioweaponry, and they tried to force us to take it knowing it would kill us.” The statement declares that “It can never go back to normal.” The speaker calls for abolition of several U.S. agencies: “No more CIA. No more FBI. No more NSA. No more fucking DARPA.” They also condemn the CDC, the FDA, and the NIH, saying, “the CDC has proven themselves to be absolutely garbage as well as the FDA and the NIH.” The message concludes that “normal is over.” The speaker emphasizes that “we’re gonna have to do something and make big changes, and things are gonna have to come down.” They insist that “It’s not just gonna go away, and everybody’s gonna be happy and great again.” They assert that “these people tried to kill us.” They add, “They have never stopped experimenting on” [the implication being ongoing experimentation].
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't think that we're gonna just leave this as is, that we can just go back to normal. These people invented gene therapy, and they tried to lie to the world to make us all take it. They used gain of function, which is bioweaponry, and they tried to force us to take it knowing it would kill us. It can never go back to normal. No more CIA. No more FBI. No more NSA. No more fucking DARPA. I think the CDC has proven themselves to be absolutely garbage as well as the FDA and the NIH. So normal is over. We're gonna have to do something and make big changes, and things are gonna have to come down. It's not just gonna go away, and everybody's gonna be happy and great again. These people tried to kill us. They have never stopped experimenting on

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @DrNagase Ppl applying to get jobs with RFK r even outside US like Dr Jessica Rose, so wouldn't let where ur or even if not qualified stop u as he may need all help he can get RFK task so overwhelming apply anyway 2 help,u don't have to accept offer @DrNagase

@BryceMLipscomb - Bryce Lipscomb🗽

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨: @RobertKennedyJr just announced that President Donald Trump has asked him to lead the reorganization of @CDC, @NIH, @US_FDA, & parts of the @USDA.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies—the CDC, NIH, FDA, and some USDA agencies—that have a portfolio affecting human health. He wants me to clean up the corruption, end the conflicts of interest, and return these agencies to their tradition of gold standard empirically based, evidence-based science and evidence-based medicine. He also asked me to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country and, specifically, to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump has asked me to reorganize the federal health agencies, the agencies that have a portfolio that affects human health, which is CDC, NIH, c d FDA, as well as some of the agencies within the United States Department of Agriculture. He's asked me to clean up the corruption, number one. Number two, end the conflicts of interest, return those agencies to their rich tradition of gold standard empirically based evidence based science, evidence based medicine, and to end the chronic disease epidemic in this country. And he's asked me specifically to measurably reduce chronic disease in our children within two years. Okay. So

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @DrNagase "Concentration Death🏕Camps" have been built for us for Birflu Pandemic 2024-25 Doc above.Dr Francis Boyle inspected.Disidents 2b rounded up who r threat to Natl Sec.Scenario below. DrZelenko said UBI is MAIDS(Dr Assist Suicide list)could be related

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE 'QUARANTINE' CAMPS HAVE BEEN BUILT - THE STAGE HAS BEEN SET (1/5) Dr. Francis Boyle: "The camps have been built, and...people I've worked with have gone out and seen them. They are there. They've been there for quite some time." Professor of international law Dr. Francis Boyle describes for Dr. Meryl Nass (@NassMeryl) on a recent episode of Good Morning CHD (@ChildrensHD) how "quarantine camps" have been built in New York State and have been there "for quite some time." Nass, a physician and writer, notes that attorney Bobbie Anne Cox (@Attorney_Cox) has been "fighting in New York State to stop the building of quarantine camps." Nass asks rhetorically, "What do we need quarantine camps for now?" "Those camps are there," Boyle responds. He adds, "the camps have been built, and I have people I've worked with [who have] gone out and seen them. They are there. They've been there for quite some time." Furthermore, Boyle notes that "either Reagan or Bush Senior ordered Oliver North to draft Rex 84, which [is a contingency plan] that in the event this [mass protests] happened, those areas of the country would be put under martial law, and we would all be detained." Partial transcription of clip: Nass: "You know, quarantine camps for the Japanese during World War 2 also. Right. And Bobbie Anne Cox Flowers, fighting in New York State to stop the building of quarantine camps. What do we need quarantine camps for now? But that's what the state government is doing." Boyle: "Those camps are there. What happened, I was counsel to the pledge of resistance back in the 1980s. We had a hundred thousand members take a pledge there. If Reagan invaded Nicaragua, we would all take to the streets in exercise of our first amendment rights to protest whereupon, either Reagan or Bush Senior, ordered Oliver North to draft Rex 84, which would be that in the event this happened, those areas of the country would be put under martial law, and we would all be detained. So the camps have been built, and I have people I've worked with gone out and seen. They are there. They've been there for quite some time."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss historical and contemporary concerns about “quarantine camps.” Speaker 0 references quarantine camps for the Japanese during World War II and notes Bobby Anne Cox Flowers’s activism in New York state to stop the building of quarantine camps, asking what purpose such camps serve now while acknowledging that the state government is pursuing them. The exchange suggests that these camps were or are being maintained or created in the present day, prompting the question of why they would be needed. Speaker 1 adds that, in their experience as counsel to the pledge of resistance in the 1980s, there was a mass pledge—about 100,000 members—to take to the streets if Reagan invaded Nicaragua, exercising First Amendment rights to protest. They claim that in response, either Reagan or Bush senior directed Oliver North to draft Rex 84, which would, in the event of such an invasion, authorize the detention of people and the designation of areas of the country to be under martial law. The assertion is that these provisions were designed to enable the suspension of civil liberties and the detention of citizens, effectively indicating that facilities such as camps had been prepared or designated for this purpose. Speaker 0 confirms the existence of the camps and questions whether the federal government has invoked Rex 84 or carried it out, asking whether Congress passed it. They respond that Rex 84 was an executive order, not a congressional statute, and express uncertainty about its current status. The conversation then reiterates that the camps have been built or existed for some time, with Speaker 1 maintaining that the proposals were connected to directives from the executive branch rather than through legislation. The dialogue highlights a belief that camps already exist and that a mechanism like Rex 84 could enable rapid detention and martial-law-like conditions in the United States, tied to historical episodes of civil-liberties concerns during the 1980s. The speakers emphasize the distinction between executive action and congressional action, noting that Rex 84 was issued as an executive order and suggesting it has not been revoked according to their understanding, though they admit they have not read it and acknowledge its continued presence on a government or legal docket. The exchange centers on whether such structures remain in place and how they might be activated in the future, linking past protest history, executive directives, and the contemporary debate over quarantine camps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you know, quarantine camps for the Japanese during World War two also. Right. And Bobby Anne Cox Flowers fighting in New York state to stop the building of quarantine camps. What do we need quarantine camps for now? But that's what the state government is doing. Speaker 1: Those camps are there. They what happened I was counsel to the pledge of resistance back in the nineteen eighties. We had a 100,000 members take a pledge that if Reagan invaded Nicaragua, we would all take to the streets in exercise of our First Amendment rights to protest, whereupon either Reagan or Bush senior ordered Oliver North to draft Rex 84, which would be that in the event this happened, those areas of the country would be put under martial law, and we would all be detained. So the camps have been built, and I Yeah. There I've had people I've worked with going out and seen. They are there. They've been there for quite some time. Yes. Speaker 0: Well, on that said note and and I don't think the federal government has mean, Rex 84. Did congress pass that? No. It was Aldrin North. Executive order. Speaker 1: It was an executive order. I do not believe it has ever been revoked. I haven't read it. I'm sure it's on the books there somewhere. Sure.

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @DrNagase Replicon Dangers with @DrNagase @PhdSansone

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

🔊Dr. Daniel Nagase: "Replicon technology...is beyond nuclear weapons. If you think nuclear weapons are bad, think about something like a nuclear bomb that can make copies of itself...and set a timer to explode one year later, 10 years later, 50 years later even." E.R. Physician Dr. Daniel Nagase (@DrNagase) describes for Dr. Joseph Sansone (@PhdSansone) how replicon technology—also known as "self-amplifying mRNA"—is "beyond nuclear weapons" in regard to the existential dangers it poses to humanity. Nagase, who has previously said that replicon technology could result in a "cancer that can spread between people," notes that these self-amplifying mRNA shots could be put on a delayed release timeline of up to 50 years or longer. Note that the replicon shots have already been unleashed in Japan, on the Japanese people—particularly the elderly population. (See tweet 2.) "I wrote an article on my Substack called 'Japan's plan to destroy the world.' And that is how dangerous Replicon technology is," Nagase tells Sansone. "This is beyond nuclear weapons. If you think nuclear weapons are bad, think about something like a nuclear bomb that can make copies of itself. And not only just make copies of itself, it can make copies of itself and set a timer to explode one year later, 10 years later, 50 years later even...this is the nuclear weapon of biology." "It's a self-replicating [technology]...that's what a replicon is. It can do anything. It has the power power to copy itself. It has the power to steal genes from other species. It's omnipotent. It's basically the omnipotent virus." Nagase adds: "The more copies of Replicon you have out in the environment, the faster you're gonna get one that is deadly, one that can spread, one that can spread without causing too many symptoms. In fact, from a natural selection standpoint, the evolutionary pressure for a replicon is to cause as minimal symptoms as possible to enable the host to carry out the regular activities during the day...." Partial transcription of clip: "So then, you know, I thought with with all the side effects of regular mRNA starting to hit the news in 2024, the government would would immediately stop the self replicating version of mRNA. Because if mRNA already has this many side effects and people dying in Japan and, you know, people you know, young people dying for no reason. And if it's already hitting the mainstream news in Japan, there's no way the government should allow a self replicating version. "But it didn't stop. I wrote an article on my Substack called Japan's plan to destroy the world. And that is how dangerous Replicon technology is. This is beyond nuclear weapons. If you think nuclear weapons are bad, think about something like a nuclear bomb that can make copies of itself. And not only just make copies of itself, it can make copies of itself and set a timer to explode one year later, 10 years later, 50 years later even. That is that is this is the nuclear weapon of biology. It's a self replicating one, and that's what a replicon is. It can do anything. It has the power power to copy itself. It has the power to steal genes from other species. It's omnipotent. It's basically the omnipotent virus. "And the more copies of Replicon you have out in the environment, the faster you're gonna get one that is deadly, one that can spread, one that can spread without causing too many symptoms. In fact, from a natural selection standpoint, the evolutionary pressure for a replicon is to cause as minimal symptoms as possible to enable the host to carry out the regular activities during the day, and that maximizes the chances that the host will also, at the same time..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on concerns about self-replicating mRNA (replicon) technology. The speaker argues that, given media coverage in 2024 about side effects of regular mRNA and reports of deaths in Japan, the government should immediately halt self-replicating mRNA. They reference a Substack article titled "Japan's plan to destroy the world," claiming replicon technology is extraordinarily dangerous—“beyond nuclear weapons.” The speaker describes a replicon as “the nuclear weapon of biology,” comparing it to a device that can copy itself and set a timer to explode years later (one year, ten years, fifty years). They emphasize that a replicon has the power to copy itself and to steal genes from other species, calling it “omnipotent” and “the omnipotent virus.” The doctor (referred to as Doctor Nagasaki) is pressed for comment, with the speaker noting that more copies of a replicon in the environment increase the likelihood of producing a deadly variant that can spread with minimal symptoms. They explain, from a natural selection perspective, that the evolutionary pressure on a replicon is to cause as few symptoms as possible to allow the host to continue normal daily activities, thereby maximizing transmission. The discussion also includes a brief mention of monitoring a chat discussion, indicating engagement with the audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So then, you know, I thought with with all the side effects of regular mRNA starting to hit the news in 2024, the government would would immediately stop the self replicating version of mRNA. Because if mRNA already has this many side effects and people dying in Japan and, you know, people you know, young people dying for no reason, And if it's already hitting the mainstream news in Japan, there's no way the government should allow a self replicating version. But it didn't stop. So Quickie question there, sir. Doctor, can can I ask you first? Have article on my substack called Japan's plan to destroy the world. And that is how dangerous replicon technology is. This is the this is the this is beyond nuclear weapons. If you think nuclear weapons are bad, think about something like a nuclear bomb that can make copies of itself. And not only just make copies of itself, it can make copies of itself and set a timer to explode one year later, ten years later, fifty years later even. That is that is this is the nuclear weapon of biology. Doctor Nagasaki self replicating one, and it's that's that's what a replicon is. It can do anything. It has the power power to copy itself. It has the power to steal genes from other species. It's it's omnipotent. It's it's basically the omnipotent virus. Doc, can you hear me? The more copies of replicon you have out in the environment, the faster you're gonna get one that is deadly, one that can spread, one that can spread without causing too many symptoms. In fact, from a natural selection standpoint, the evolutionary pressure for a replicon is to cause as minimal symptoms as possible to enable the host to carry out the regular activities during the day, and that maximizes the chances that the host will also at the same time oh, I see something on the chat.

@DrNagase - Dr.Nagase

@ET_sharing @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @PhdSansone https://note.com/tubo_suke1/n/na3ece398d757 An english translation of where Japan is at right now with Replicon.

Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. has begun threatening to sue Japanese citizens.|壺助 Do people around the world know that Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., a Japanese pharmaceutical company, has launched a self-amplifying RNA vaccine and started providing it to Japanese people? Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd. first created a prototype of a self-amplifying RNA vaccine using the Wuhan s note.com

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @PhdSansone G7 countries incl Canada🇨🇦& UK🇬🇧possibly all r fast tracking permanent Vaccinepassport on Steroids(DigitalID)perhaps related to Birdflu or 2025 milestone 4 ImmunizationAgenda2030 they changed name to DigitalID as unpopular.Require Covid & other Injections

@ResilientRye - Ryan

🚨BREAKING: Secretly mandated digital ID in Canada‼️ @MichelleRempel Canadian Comservative MP breaks story of Justin Trudeau and his Liberal-NDP government seeking to secretly impose digital ID on Canadians to be able to access goods and services which could also be revoked by the government at any time. Legacy media is silent about the issue.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a new report from Blacklock’s Reporter about the federal push for a national digital ID. The article states that federal regulators yesterday said they are “working to establish digital credentials for the public without parliamentary go ahead.” MPs have repeatedly rejected the introduction of any national electronic digital ID systems as expensive and risky. The notice, shared by Shared Services Canada, the Federal ID Department, says: “Any new system, and here's the kicker, any new system should allow regulators to revoke credentials,” but it did not elaborate, and it did not explain if enrollment would be mandatory. The presenter emphasizes that, despite legislators’ objections, the Liberal government is “quietly going around talking about building a digital ID” that would permit credential revocation, and there is no explanation about enrollment being mandatory. The speaker frames this as part of the Prime Minister’s hidden agenda, suggesting action happens “through the back door, through these, like, sneaky little contract things.” On the political response, the presenter says the Conservative Party will oppose the move. He cites Liberal Bill C-63, described as their “massive censorship bill,” and says he tabled an opposing bill that would “keep Canadians safe online, but quote expressly prohibit the use of a digital ID,” noting that the principle is written into his bill. He highlights Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s opposition to digital IDs, pointing to Poilievre’s 2022 Twitter posts where he said government attempts to impose digital IDs and other intrusive tracking and surveillance are “an attack on our freedom. I will end them.” The presenter notes Poilievre has continued to tweet about the issue and has a petition linked on his Twitter page, with the message that “common sense conservatives will ban mandatory digital IDs, full stop.” He asserts that conservatives are fighting this and mentions that the story is not being reported by outlets like CBC. The presenter references ongoing efforts to expose government actions beyond what mainstream media covers, alleging that Trudeau’s censorship bills suppress such stories. He urges viewers to share the video and click subscribe, and mentions a link in the video description to a full breakdown about an investigation his colleague and another MP are asking the Competition Bureau to undertake. In closing, the presenter reiterates that Liberal leadership uses back-channel methods to push agendas, and that the Conservative Party, led by Poilievre, will do everything in its power to stop a mandatory digital ID. The report ends by highlighting the headline: “Fed's proposed national digital ID.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a story that was that's just broken. It's just been posted by Blacklock's reporter. And the the headline reads, Fed's proposed national digital ID. So I'm just gonna read the first couple paragraphs of this article so that you can get a sense of what we're dealing with here. Federal regulators yesterday said that they are, quote, working to establish digital credentials for the public without parliamentary go ahead. MPs have repeatedly rejected introduction of any national electronic digital ID systems as expensive and risky. And this is a quote from the article: With more businesses conducted online, the Government of Canada and interested partners need a common set of capabilities to enable people to issue, hold, present these types of credentials to make trusted claims about themselves in a way that are user friendly, blah blah blah blah blah, set a notice to contractors shared by Shared Services Canada, the Federal ID Department. Any new system, and here's the kicker, any new system should allow regulators to revoke credentials, said the Notice on the common set of capabilities for issuing and verifying digital credentials for the Government of Canada. It did not elaborate. The notice did not explain if enrollment would be mandatory. So what's happening here? And again, this is in Black Lox Reporter. I'm reading right out of an article. Like, is a journalistic outlet that reports here on the hill. I'm not making this up. This is right here. It's just breaking. So what's happening here is that in spite of, you know, legislators saying, no, we can't do this. We can't do this. The government of Canada, the Liberal government, is quietly going around talking about building a digital ID that's, quote, that would allow regulators to revoke credentials and did not explain if the enrollment would be mandatory. That's what we're dealing with with Justin Trudeau. You know, it's these hidden agendas where he's going out and saying, no. No. No. No. No. We're not gonna do these things. And then through the back door, through these, like, sneaky little contract things, he's saying what his actual agenda is. So I just wanna be really clear. So, again, if you guys can share this video, click subscribe, it helps me get the word out. I I know what you guys are probably asking this point. What are you doing? What's the conservative party of Canada doing to stop this? Of course, we are going to oppose this. Of course, we're opposing it. I can give you guys many examples of how we've been fighting back on this. So for example, Liberal Bill c 63, their massive censorship bill, I tabled, like an opposing bill which would keep Canadians safe online, but quote expressly prohibit the use of a digital ID. It's written right into my bill to show that principle in law that we wouldn't do this. And I wanna draw your attention to how hard conservative leader Pierre Pauliev has been working to oppose this issue as well too. So this goes all the way back to 2022. Here's Pierre Polyav on his Twitter feed saying, government attempts to impose digital IDs and other intrusive tracking and surveillance message are an attack on our freedom. I will end them. So this is over two years ago now. He's got he's had numerous public statements to this effect since then. And then today, in light of reports, this report again, this is not like, you're not gonna find this report on CBC. Of course, you're not. But mister Polyev has in fact tweeted that, he's tweeted about the story, and he says common sense conservatives will ban mandatory digital IDs, full stop. So he's got a link to his petition on his Twitter page, and, of course, conservatives are fighting this. But you need to know about this. Right? This is this is kind of in a this isn't a in in in in in independent journalistic outlet that they do report here on the hill, but this is not being reported on. Right? And we know that Justin Trudeau's censorship bills prevent these types of stories from getting out into the public, which is why it's so important for you to share these videos, to click subscribe, and again there's a story that I want there's another story that I want to tell you about, I'll probably do that tomorrow in a video, but there's a link in the comment section. It's a full breakdown about, an investigation that my colleague and I, another member of parliament, are asking the Competition Bureau to undertake. Click on that, read it, click subscribe so that I can tell you about what's happening here in Ottawa. That's the reality these days. Right? Is that these the Liberals try and make these things happen in the background and then have you not find out about it. It's it's our job as legislators to stay on top of it, but we need you to know so that the public knows and can and can help us fight back too. So share this video. Rest assured that the Conservative Party of Canada led by Conservative leader Pierre Pauliev will do everything in its power to stop a mandatory digital ID. But it's right in the media this morning, folks. Fed's proposed national digital ID. Isn't that something?

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @PhdSansone LEAK DIGITALID - Incl Covid injection,Tetanus,Flu,MMR,Polio,Herpes, HIV.Birdflu open box for.Sneak thru during US Election hype.DigitalID by DIWG of 8 countries - US,Canada,Netherlands,Au,NZ,U,K,Isrl,Singapore DigitalID CBDC SocialCreditSys"PreCrimeIndex

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises concern about Instagram sharing a link to cdc.gov and foregrounds what a QR code can reveal. He says the QR code that people have holds a lot more information on them than they may think, noting that this is Canada’s QR code but many countries have a similar thing. He enumerates the information embedded in the QR code: - Religion - Organ donor - Driver’s license - Marital status - Nonessential access - Reserved for future use (a note that there is information planned for future use) - Allergies - Gender identity - Smoker - Sex - Are you a firearms owner? - Are you a restricted firearms owner? - Are you do you have any warrants? - Then, what’s your credit score? - How many accounts do you have? - How much do you owe? - What did you make this year? - What did you make last year? He asserts that this is how much information the QR code will have and that it will be the social credit system on steroids, if not a carbon copy of it. He claims this is what people are being—implied to be—subjected to, and that the only power this system has is the power you give it. He concludes with: If everyone refute.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't want on your Instagram just because it puts that stupid thing to cdc.gov. But, look at this QR code. The QR code that people have holds a lot more information on them than they may think. Okay. This is Canada's QR code, but many countries have the similar thing. Look at all the information it has on you. Religion, organ donor, driver's license, marital status, nonessential access, reserved for future use. So that's a thing that they're gonna have more info in the future. Allergies, gender identity, smoker, sex. Are you a firearms owner? Are you a restricted firearms owner? Are you do you have any warrants? And then look at this. What's your credit score? How many accounts do Speaker 1: you have? How much do you owe? What did you Speaker 0: make this year? What did you make last year? This is how much information that QR code will have. This will be the social credit system on steroids, if not a carbon copy of it. And this is what people are being it is being imposed on. That's being imposed on them. And the only power this has is the power you give it. If everyone refute

@Artemisfornow - Bernie

DIGITAL ID - Whilst you’re all distracted with the budget, the government has quietly launched a new department. ‘Office for Digital Identities and Attributes’ which will oversee the UK’s digital ID market and roll out. They kept that quiet didn’t they?

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport @PhdSansone M^Rna (ModRna?) Entering food chain by Farmed Shrimp, Pork and possibly other means with no testing. Beef was a big issue for potential rollout months ago but I don't know what happened with that @RenzTom may. No word on Self Amplyfing Mrna in food

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes that vaccines are entering the food chain in several species. He mentions that currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA, and that pork is an unknown amount being vaccinated with mRNA. He references Merck, described as one of the originators of ivermectin, and asks why they didn’t make a big fuss about the money they lost during COVID because of the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing, suggesting they could have been a kingpin in this, and they were silent. He says this is because they own a lot of mRNA companies. He notes that some of the companies state on their advertising, “we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine.” He states there are vaccines going into the swine industry, but there is no data on how much is being sold, where, and who the buyers are, so the volume remains speculative. The technology is described as customized vaccines where, on a farm, they take samples of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab, and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine customized to the farm’s diseases. He emphasizes that there’s no testing, no research, nothing. They have a general understanding of the mRNA aspect of it on a general standpoint, but for each of these antigens, there is known no understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are entering our food chain in several species. So currently, all farmed shrimp are being vaccinated with mRNA. Currently, pork is an unknown amount is being vaccinated with mRNA. It's, Merck who we know as the, one of the originators of ivermectin, and you wonder why they didn't make a big fuss at the amount of money they lost during COVID because of the the inability to sell ivermectin into the whole thing. They could have been a a kingpin in this, and they were silent. Why? It's because they own a lot of mRNA companies. Some of the companies state on their advertising, we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine. So they have vaccines going into the swine industry. We don't have data on how much of it's being sold and where and who are the buyers. So it's all speculative on the volume, but the technology is rather interesting. It's a customized vaccines where they go onto a farm, they take samples of the of the diseases on the farm, then go into the lab, and a few days later, they produce an mRNA vaccine for your customized to your farm's diseases. There's no testing, no research, nothing. You know, they have a a general, understanding of the mRNA aspect of it, on a general standpoint. But for each of these antigens, there is known no understanding.

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport State of panic. Heads of UN ans WHO meeting as well says @Stuckelberger Could be elect1on related too. Very little in news isn't planned well finally advance including Emergencies Possibly start of the #Birdflu P1andemic that docs found on 2024 2025

@jamelholley - Jamel Holley

Sources tell me top five CEOs of pharmaceutical companies are holding an emergency teleconference at 1 PM. A lawyer has confirmed that everyone is in a state of panic!

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@ALMAlienLivesM1 @DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Dr @Stuckelberger says Heads of UN & WHO melted too at same time or with Bigpharma emerg

@Stuckelberger - Dr Astrid Stuckelberger

Yes, Head of WHO and UN too…😉

@jamelholley - Jamel Holley

Sources tell me top five CEOs of pharmaceutical companies are holding an emergency teleconference at 1 PM. A lawyer has confirmed that everyone is in a state of panic!

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport The New Vaccinepassport they changed name to DigitalID as Vaccinepassport so unpopular really needs to be stopped ✋️ now. Who's ever President expect them to sign in DigitalID under pretext of Illegal immigration

@LeslynLewis - Dr. Leslyn Lewis

Last year I put out this video on the dangers of Digital ID. At that time, the government refused to admit that they were working to implement it, and labelled me a conspiracy theorist for telling you the truth. Ironically, standing up for truth even in the face of ridicule is one of the best parts of my job! Unfortunately, the Liberal government is quietly moving towards imposing universal Digital ID, and completely circumventing Parliament and public consultation. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/digital-government-innovations/digital-credentials.html Watch my video so you can understand how governments can easily abuse Digital ID.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is discussing the World Economic Forum (WEF) Agile Nations Charter that the Government of Canada signed in November 2020 and how it relates to digital credentials and other technologies. The speaker notes that the prime minister did not tell Canadians that this would usher in the fourth industrial revolution by changing how policy is made in Canada. After outlining several Agile Nations projects—Coordinating National Standards Body of Agile Nations, digital credentials, preloaded air cargo targeting, consumer connecting products, experimental approaches, anticipatory regulation, digital health software devices—the focus is narrowed to digital credentials and related technologies. The Digital Credentials Project is described as being led by Canada under Agile Nations, aiming to make digital trust and digital ID technologies more seamless across borders. It involves workshops, proofs of concept, and pilots. The speaker asserts that there is a lack of transparency surrounding these initiatives and points to concerns about government abuse of centralized personal data. Canadians are presented with a request for the ability to opt out of privacy-intrusive digital IDs, artificial intelligence, and smart technologies. Examples cited to illustrate potential government overreach include the Emergencies Act usage to freeze protesters’ bank accounts and the ArriveCAN app, which the speaker claims discriminated against seniors who lacked smartphones. The central argument is that digital IDs should not be mandatory given past government actions, and that people generally use existing digital means (bank cards, online payments) without government control over all their data. The concern is that a digital ID could enable government surveillance or social-political control, especially if linked with other data such as driving records, health information, banking data, purchases, or even sensitive attributes like religion or political beliefs. The speaker connects digital IDs to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), suggesting that a move to digital IDs could enable CBDCs, which could allow governments to track purchases and impose limits or programmable constraints on spending, travel, or item availability. This leads to questions about ethical frameworks, governance, and safeguards. The absence of transparency, public engagement, or legislation is framed as evidence that the prime minister does not prioritize protecting Canadians from digital ID abuse. Further concerns include the lack of comprehensive privacy legislation to regulate both government and private sector use of digital IDs. The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) is described as focusing on businesses, with government roles under-regulated. Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, is noted as addressing privacy only in the private sector, with responsibility shifted to businesses. The speaker argues for a national, overarching framework to protect privacy, rather than pushing obligations onto small businesses. The speaker asserts that the Agile Nations Charter demonstrates liberal government intentions and urges ongoing democratic involvement to prevent executive overreach. Pierre Poilievre is highlighted as listening to concerns and promising that digital IDs will never be mandatory. The message concludes with a call to contact federal representatives to support a federal digital charter that protects Canadians from digital ID abuses by government and corporations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello again, family. As promised, I'm continuing a study of the World Economic Forum, WEF, and the Government of Canada's partnership under the Agile Nations Charter that the Liberal government signed in November 2020. At no time did the prime minister tell Canadians that he would be ushering in the fourth industrial revolution by completely altering the way that we make policy in this country. I covered in the first video the corporations, countries, and Canadian departments that are part of this WEF initiated Agile Nations Charter, which is an international network to streamline regulations across borders to advance new technologies. I am now going to highlight a couple of the projects under the this WEF Agile Nations charter within Canada. Coordinating National Standards Body of Agile Nations, digital credentials, second. The third one is preloaded air cargo targeting. Fourth, consumer connecting products. Fifth, experimental approaches. Sixth, anticipatory regulation. Seventh, digital health software devices. Today, I'm not going to talk about all of the projects, but I will speak to just the ones that focus on digital credentials and technologies. I receive so many letters and calls from many of you on digital IDs, smart cities and 15 cities. And so I wanna make sure that we look at digital IDs and technology and the components thereof in the Agile Nation's work and programs. These projects aim to increase the global reliance on digital trusted technologies as it says in the government disclosure, their own disclosure. In other words, it's about making it easier for digital IDs to become a part of our permanent daily lives. The Digital Credentials Project is a project that is led by Canada under the agile nations that focuses on making digital trust and digital ID technologies more seamless across borders, and they're conducting workshops, proofs of concepts, and pilots to make this happen. There's a lot that we don't know about this, which is the problem because it's going back to the lack of transparency that we keep seeing from this liberal government. The problem that most Canadians have with this expansion and globalization of digital credentials and technologies is that the government can abuse its power when it has access to all that of that information. Also, Canadians want to have a choice to opt out of privacy intrusive digital IDs, artificial intelligence AI, and smart technologies. They don't want this forced upon them. And it's true that Canadians need protection from potential governmental abuse of their privacy, especially if all of their personal information is stored in one digital identity. I remind you that prime minister Trudeau used the Emergencies Act to freeze bank accounts of protesters that he that criticized him. Maybe if that didn't happen, people would be more trusting of government and digital IDs. We also witnessed the mandatory ArriveCAN app and how it discriminated against seniors who didn't have a smartphone. They were fined and some were prevented from getting back into their own country without extensive delays until they downloaded the app and uploaded their personal medical information. Digital IDs cannot be mandatory, especially when the government hasn't addressed its past abuses and when it hasn't ironed out how they're going to prevent future governmental overreach. Most people don't have a problem with digital IDs that I've heard from per se. They are already using their bank cards, credit cards, and digital means of wiring and paying bills. But the problem is that they don't trust the government with access to all of their personal information in one place. Right now, a person can buy something in cash and no one else needs to know about it. No one else can electronically track that. Our credit cards track our purchases, but they don't get sent to the government. You can give your spouse or your children or your friend money, and nobody else knows about it. However, with a digital ID, all of this may change in the future. The priority of the Liberal Party should be to assure Canadians that their data will be protected and that there will be sufficient safeguards and checks to protect against government intrusion. So what does a Digital ID entail and how does it relate to Agile Nations? Digital ID can be defined as digitally stored identifying information that is used to validate your identity on an online platform. This process uses usernames, passwords, social insurance numbers, national ID numbers, biometric authentication such as fingerprints or facial recognition, and sometimes digital signatures. These digital IDs are tied to your social and economic transactions that you would make in society, such as they can be tied to your driving information, your health card, your banking information, your purchases, and possibly even sensitive information like your religion or your political beliefs. Given the amount of information stored in these digital IDs, there's fear that if it's not properly regulated, digital information can be collected and it may get into the hands of a bad actor or government could flip a switch and lock you out of access to key services, or use your information without obtaining your expressed consent. When trust is broken, as it was when the government shut down people's bank accounts for protesting, people become hyper concerned about future overreach and any big changes that are not properly explained. People are asking questions like, can a digital ID be used to control or punish political opposition? Or will certain businesses not sell to certain people who have, quote unquote, unacceptable views, for example, when people were kicked off of social media platforms? Or could that data be programmed into your digital ID? Of course, connected to this is the central bank digital currency, the CBDCs, another mechanism by which government can surveil and monitor you. Once we've moved to digital ID, a central bank digital currency can easily be implemented. With CBDCs, governments could theoretically track everything that you purchase, and the implications of that are, of course, frightening. Will government then tell you how much of an item you can buy? What types of things you can spend your money on? Where and when you can travel? Many Canadians are also concerned that the currencies may be programmable, meaning that they could assign an expiry date attached to the currency or other limits on what you can access with that currency. With all the myriad of issues and questions to address, you would think that there would be big policy discussions and legislation brought forward to iron out these challenges. You would also expect that things like digital IDs and central bank digital currencies would not be developed without the ethical framework in place to protect Canadians. The absence of any transparency, of any engagement or consultations with Canadians, or legislation to address these issues and concerns makes it clear that our prime minister does not believe that he needs to do anything to protect Canadians' digital identities and freedoms from governmental abuse. The privacy and autonomy of Canadians is extremely important. And unfortunately, the federal government doesn't have the ethical privacy legislation needed to protect Canadians from their own government in this digital age. Once digital information is collected about you, is it de identified? Does it pass through a third party? Is it anonymized so that it can no longer be connected to you? That is the only way to really ensure privacy. Also, Canadians should be able to meaningfully consent to which portions of their information they want shared and with whom. There is an absence of strong overarching federal legislation or regulation that will set minimum standards and the limits as to what businesses can do with your digital ID and information. The privacy commissioner has raised concerns that we have been moving into a digital age and that the legislation to protect privacy in this arena is lagging. If we look at the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, PIPADA, we see that while the focus is on businesses, what's missing is the role of government in setting the standards. The government introduced Bill c 27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, which is currently before parliament, but again, it addresses privacy protection in only the private sector and places all the responsibility of digital ID protection on business owners. The federal government should be creating a national overarching framework that will protect privacy. Instead, it seems that the federal government is just passing the buck to businesses. It's not acceptable for the federal government to push this onto small businesses, adding layers of red tape and punitive measures without leading by example and holding itself to the same standards. If the liberal government had time to sign a WEF led agile nations charter in November 2020 during COVID lockdowns and draft legislation to regulate small businesses, then there is no excuse why they should not put in place a national digital charter that protects Canadians from digital ID abuse from both government and from corporations. Family, the signing of the Agile Nations Charter and the work on the digital credentials project that the Liberals have committed us to under the global Charter clearly shows their intention. We still have a democracy, and we need to stay involved and push back against this domination of the executive branch through the Agile Nations Charter. Because if we don't, we are going to continue to see governments operating below the radar of Canadians and outside of parliament. Our leader, the honorable Pierre Polyev, is listening to your concerns and will not dismiss your questions on digital ID. He has promised that digital ID will never be mandatory. No matter what changes may be occurring in society, you can always be sure that conservatives will continue to fight to ensure that your personal privacy and autonomy will always be protected. If you would like to help, reach out to your federal representative and let them know that you believe that we need a federal digital charter to protect us against potential governmental abuse of our private digital information. Thank you so much for watching. Until next time. Bye bye for now.
Trusted access to digital services - Canada.ca canada.ca

@ET_sharing - Dr.Martens_casualshoe

@ALMAlienLivesM1 @DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport M^Rna Gene Editing GMO Platform is it likely to stop with RFK? Tonight https://t.co/8pwMEea6Ht

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

WILL TRUMP STOP mRNA?? Guest @sasha_latypova Says She Is Disappointed That @RobertKennedyJr Stopped Talking About mRNA Bioweapons Once He Joined Trump's Team TONIGHT on The Dr. Jane Ruby Show™️ 8:00 PM ET Rumble.com/drjaneruby https://t.co/R67pbz5Ewq

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @JanciToxDoc @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Suspect Mrna is part of National Security is y not pulling it as BioCyberInterface Infrastructure. I posted USGov legal disclosure by Op Warpspeed that Ppl receiving Mrna platform by Inject or shed r connected for Biosurveilance. Google/Oracle had contract https://t.co/1ie5Zqw0PL

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

@ALMAlienLivesM1 @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Thanks, will listen. I won’t discount this, it’s just not my area of expertise so I have trouble easily understanding it. I’m hoping I’ll have more time in the coming months to get up to speed.

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Janci I understand.When OpWarpspeed Disclosed Mrna CovidVax put ppl under"Biosurveillance"& Google/Oracle had Contract & Col. Matt Hepburn Vax Coord stonewalled CDC on "How doing this"as frmr Prgm Mgr Darpa he explained by🛜Wireless connectivity of Biosynthetic Biology(Pathogen) https://t.co/NOgyOOSvl1

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

@ALMAlienLivesM1 @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Thanks. I won’t discount anything just because I don’t understand how it works. It just takes more time.

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Janci, Col. Matt Hepburn Vax Coord OpWarpSpeed who stonewalled CDC above,not coincidently b4 was Prgm Mgr DARPA for Biosurveillance Prgrm & Pandemic Flu later renamed Covid.The Biosynthetic substance is Hydrogel(Lipid Nanoparticles are)they're multiuse. https://t.co/2fP1ChJF7L https://t.co/RNtArl5BB3

Video Transcript AI Summary
A program manager in the Biological Technologies Office at DARPA, an active duty army infectious diseases physician specialized in addressing biological threats that can be engineered or naturally occurring, discusses one of the technologies he actively manages: a company called Profusa, which aims at achieving tissue level continuous health monitoring. Through the SBIR program, they funded Profusa to solve an incredible technical challenge that no one else had previously been able to solve. The key innovation presented is the question: Why can't we make a chemical substance that's really identical to what's underneath the skin, what we call the subcutaneous tissue, so that your body doesn't recognize it as a foreign body response? It just incorporates itself into the tissue. There are now many examples where a sensor put right underneath the skin can sense things like oxygen and other chemicals that are very important to our metabolism, and not just sense that for a day or a week or even a month, but the team imagines that sensing these parameters can go on for a period of years. One of the most important applications to DARPA is to improve the health of the worldwide deployed military force. There is a strong sense of obligation that if we're going to ask somebody to be deployed and to carry out their mission, we want to keep them healthy. This technology will give a way to monitor if someone is getting sick, and they imagine that they would be able to sense that very early and therefore prevent them from getting sick and prevent their complications, allow them to stay healthy and continue to carry out their mission. In addition, if the technology translates into general health benefit, they are very excited about that. In other words, they fund those national security applications, while the company pursues private sector partnerships.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A program manager in the biological technologies office at DARPA. I am an active duty army infectious diseases physician and have specialized in addressing biological threats that can either be engineered or naturally occurring, such as Ebola or pandemic influenza. Today we're going to be talking about one of the technologies that I actively manage, a company called Profusa, which is aiming at achieving tissue level continuous health monitoring. Through the SBIR program, we funded them to solve an incredible technical challenge that no one else had been previously able to solve. The key innovation that was presented to us is they said, Why can't we make a chemical substance that's really identical to what's underneath the skin, what we call the subcutaneous tissue, so that your body doesn't recognize it as a foreign body response. It just incorporates itself into the tissue. And we have a lot of examples now where a sensor put right underneath the skin can sense things like oxygen and other chemicals that are very important to our metabolism. And not just sense that for a day or a week or even a month, but we imagine that sensing these parameters can go on for a period of years. One of the most important applications to us is so that we can improve the health of our worldwide deployed military force. We feel a strong sense of obligation that if we're going to ask somebody to be deployed and to carry out their mission that we want to keep them healthy. And this technology will give us a way to monitor if someone is getting sick. We imagine that we would be able to sense that very early and therefore prevent them from getting sick and prevent their complications, allow them to stay healthy and continue to carry out their mission. In addition, if our technology translates into general health benefit, we're very excited about that. So in other words, we fund those national security applications. The company finds, private sector partnership

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @_aussie17 @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Janci I understand.When OpWarpspeed Disclosed Mrna CovidVax put ppl under"Biosurveillance"& Google/Oracle had Contract & Col. Matt Hepburn Vax Coord stonewalled CDC on "How doing this"as frmr Prgm Mgr Darpa he explained by🛜Wireless connectivity of Biosynthetic Biology(Pathogen) https://t.co/NOgyOOSvl1

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Grok - Bio-CyberInterface in context of 6G facilitates seamless integration of body with digital world🌎by deployed NanoNodes & establish a MedicalBodyAreaNtwk(MBAN)for transmission of data within body.Part of broader #IoBNT 4 realtime health monitor & drug delivery like above https://t.co/icQVw7r06D

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport U require the Bio-CyberInterface Seamless Integration of body with DigitalWorld for function in NextDigitalEconomy Covid alleged Pandemic & Biotech Injection💉it created uptake for suite of tech Gov reports indicate ra Biosynthetic Pathogen 4 this Economy http://Policyhorizons.gc.ca

@ALMAlienLivesM1 - Dr.Pepper

@JanciToxDoc @ET_sharing @DrNagase @BanounHelene @sophiadahl1 @XOPlanetMother @BrianOSheaSPI @unhealthytruth @ProfTimNoakes @Kingston_Truth @JesslovesMJK @Doctor_I_am_The @RealDrJaneRuby @DJSpeicher @drloveariyana @sasha_latypova @CShoemakerMD @CanningPharm @la5acolumna @Stuckelberger @zeee_media @P_J_Buckhaults @DrDMartinWorld @ganaha_masako @DrJackKruse @RenzTom @naomirwolf @carrie_madej @stkirsch @SuperBen78 @AdhesionsOrg @MelissaMcAtee92 @ShabnamPalesaMo @jathorpmfm @DrHarveyRisch @jorgeluis_svh @KimIversenShow @PSardonicus @gregreese @OdessaOrlewicz @AaronSiriSG @laralogan @annvandersteel @crislerwyo @KLVeritas @BusyDrT @LisaMcGee0802 @CelestialReport Essentially, Gov't is building SMART GRID Infrastructure into your City,Neighborhood & into you 4 NextDigitalEconomy by Injection/Aerosol/Dermal deployed. Infrastructure is a matter of Nat'l Security,so ur too & thus injections💉r possibly too & perhaps y mandated & not recalled. https://t.co/i8CEEajzZI

Saved - February 1, 2025 at 10:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Holmes analyzed the submission of 60 viruses in a 2018 preprint, revealing only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were included. Current data shows 154 sequences in GenBank, with interruptions in submissions dating from October 2019. This raises questions about 9 missing ORF8 genes and several S genes. The conversation highlights ongoing efforts to recover this missing data, suggesting that the disclosures may be incomplete and emphasizing the need for thorough verification in scientific research.

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

Holmes attempted <> methods, ...with his Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, ...as evidence that the 60 viruses submitted as part of a preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of WIV, were complete but only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? Only 154 of those are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know...with this current GI series of 154 submissions is interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? Methods: basic GI series analysis this post GI is 1769824416 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824416 ...next will be 1769824414 So <> is the next missing OFR8 gene for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health 's & @Sydney_Uni 's Prof Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of @NLM_NIH soon to be headed by @DrJBhattacharya So now I am trying to help Holmes & @syd_health recover the missing data NOW tally is at eleven missing ORF8 and three missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615889.1?report=genbank and S gene is there but supressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824528 but no ORF8 gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan of a total of 15 missing... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series...Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan of 11 S genes left out of this study. Why? <> S gene is there but seems quite different to others. Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023 @COVIDSelect disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824414! Taxonomy browser (Bat SARS-like coronavirus) https://archive.md/qgC9W#selection-2037.0-2081.1

Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6303_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6303_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6303_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

One more before I put the roast on for Australia Day dinner... @GrahamPerrettMP is my local Federal MP and he has helped in the past, but last time I wrote to him he replied that I should check the Queensland State Library for more details...perhaps I should check back with him again too. These issues of how to handle the dangerous side of science have been a problem since at least Iraq's @UN biological weapons inspections...with discussions of Mustard brought to the table by @R_H_Ebright thank you, @INTERPOL_CBRNE questions are important. H/t @CharlesRixey @Ayjchan @Globalbiosec Holmes attempted <> methods, ...with his Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, ...as evidence that the 60 viruses submitted as part of a preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of WIV, were complete... but only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Only 154 of those are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know...with this current GI series of 154 submissions is interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this post GI is 1769824414 anyone can do this... https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824414 but with <> nothing is missing, all three sets are there in GenBank ORF8, S and RdRp...and apparently has identical RBD to As6526? <> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY417142 So...next will be 1769824412 <> also all three accounted for too and even features in the <>... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615887.1?report=girevhist So, next is 1769824410...Bingo! <> ORF8 missing! So <> is the next missing OFR8 gene for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health 's & @Sydney_Uni 's Prof Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of @NLM_NIH soon to be headed by @DrJBhattacharya @secrubio & @RobertKennedyJr in the mix too. So now I am trying to help Holmes & @syd_health recover the missing GenBank data...for everyone that hungers for a slice of truth tune in... NOW tally is at twelve missing ORF8 and three missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615886.1?report=genbank and S gene is there but suppressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824532 but no ORF8 gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan of a total of 15 missing... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series...Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan of 11 S genes left out of this study. Why? <> S gene is there but seems quite different to others. Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023 @COVIDSelect disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824408! Taxonomy browser (Bat SARS-like coronavirus) https://archive.md/qgC9W#selectio ...speaking of things that are difficult to understand... Any idea of how it is that @BrookeNGenovese reasonable Sep 2020 appeal to have the suspended@Twitteraccounts for:@PREDICTProject@OneHealthLabs@GlobalVirome@HALIUCDavis has gone? Perhaps some are up & running, perhaps others are still suppressed? <<@TwitterSupport also, the lab’s account @OneHealthLab &the Global Virome Project @GlobalVirome are similarly suspended..since June...despite repeated attempts to resolve. 🤨 @Twitter oh and the @HALIUCDavis account, too. Anyone noticing a theme here...?>> How is @RogerMarshallMD & @COVIDSelect going to discuss this issue with the public if the terms are suppressed? Things to chew over dinner roast?

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs160665_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA pol - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bat SARS-like coronavirus isolate As6526, complete genome - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6266_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6266_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@Studio28nyc @McWLuke @PeterDaszak @WHO @SciDiplomacyUSA @BangXiao_ @POTUS After Australia Day roast lunch (which was fantastic) I sent another email this time to Zhengli Shi & @BangXiao_ Then me & the fam went to local barefoot lawn bowls.

@R_H_Ebright - Richard H. Ebright

Only mustard at US base in Iraq was on condiments tray in mess hall #Disinformation @R_H_Ebright

@BrookeNGenovese - Brooke Genovese

Reviving this because @PREDICTProject is inexplicably suspended again SMH @TwitterSupport

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@BrookeNGenovese @twitter @PREDICTproject Not gone, just suspended You can find @PREDICTproject here

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

Seeking No14 ORF8 omission...with some healthy distraction from @breakfast_dogs @harishseshadri2 @gdemaneuf about the truisms of love...and knowing at all. @Rebecca21951651 @emilyakopp @a_kruschke @Ayjchan @VBruttel @BillyBostickson Back to the data set. Holmes attempted <> methods,@MarionKoopmans ...with his Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, ...as evidence that the 60 viruses submitted as part of a preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of WIV, were complete... https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01240-24 ...but only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Only 154 of those are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know... Note important under examined bioinformatics data: ...with this current GI series of 154 submissions is interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824408 anyone can do this... https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824408 but with <> nothing is missing, all three sets are there in GenBank ORF8, S and RdRp... So...next will be 1769824406 <> also all three accounted for too...but getting close to the typology of another hidden data set from Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology? <> isolate missing isolation source sputum collection date 2019 geographic location China: HeNan>> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/28539355 So, next is 1769824404 <> all there...but this is where the RdRp set ends and so GI for 1769824404 is < Next is 1769824402 <> all there... ///////// Hmm interesting data links here: NOTE homework <> @quay_dr @MartinaSisters <> https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31022925/ /////// Next is 1769824400 <> all three there Next is 1769824398 <> all three there Note: duplication issues here with S gene? Next is 1769824396 <> Tombola! Ambo...you see ORF8 and RdRp are here but for <> the S gene is missing. Why? So <> is the next missing data point for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health 's & @Sydney_Uni 's Prof Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of @NLM_NIH soon to be headed by@DrJBhattacharyateamed with@secrubio& @RobertKennedyJr by @POTUS So now I am trying to help Holmes & @syd_health recover the missing GenBank data...for everyone that hungers for a slice of truth tune in... NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8 and now four missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824500 ORF8 gene is there but suppressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824396 but no S gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan of a total of 15 missing... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series...Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei of 11 S genes left out of this study. Why? <> S gene is missing Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023 @COVIDSelect disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824394! ////// Suppression and Dissent in Science is such an interest topic https://documents.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/99rsppp.html ...my MA thesis Professor is very good in this area Brian Martin and also has good advice about academic reading and writing...a little every day. COVID Origin Case study is full of under examined data. EG Such an interesting set of STS & Philosophy of Science discourse data: Q/ What exactly here is so controversial? @PREDICTProjectarchive is good & interesting: @OneHealthLabsarchive @waybackmachine is too late: @HALIUCDavis archive doesn't look that useful: @GlobalVirome archive: One Health Institute (OHI) @OneHealthUCD any ideas? < ///// Oh well. next missing data point starts with the ORF8 GI 1769824394 searching for more missing S genes, I think? A little each day.

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6255_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
not collected - BioSample - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Characterization of a New Member of Alphacoronavirus with Unique Genomic Features in Rhinolophus Bats - PubMed Bats have been identified as a natural reservoir of a variety of coronaviruses (CoVs). Several of them have caused diseases in humans and domestic animals by interspecies transmission. Considering the diversity of bat coronaviruses, bat species and populations, we expect to discover more bat CoVs th … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9214_Hubei RNA-dependent RNA polyme - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9214_Hubei ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@BillyBostickson @Rebecca21951651 @gdemaneuf @CIA The love theory? Message in a bottle? They had a child called NoWay? These are all great ideas from a Cognitive Science perspective… As a philosopher of Science… life and knowing is never so simple as it seems… People are people and some are talking very…

@VBruttel - Dr. rer. nat. Valentin Bruttel

Why SARS-CoV-2 was a lab manipulated virus in 10 key points https://vbruttel.substack.com/p/why-sars-cov-2-was-a-lab-manipulated The IMO most compelling molecular and circumstantial evidence regarding the origin of COVID-19. ➡️ Please share, retweet, and raise awareness to help prevent similar events from occurring again.

Why SARS-CoV-2 was a Lab-Manipulated Virus, in 10 Key Points SARS-CoV-2 exhibits specific alterations that align so precisely with a research proposal that, combined with circumstantial evidence, they prove a laboratory origin beyond reasonable doubt. vbruttel.substack.com

@MarionKoopmans - Marion Koopmans, publications: https://pure.eur.nl

@VBruttel the real route should be: submit for peer review in a credible journal

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@StoreEducation - EducationStore

Writing how to be more productive without procrastinating or bingeing UOW: University of Wollongong, Australia Speaker: Emeritus Prof. Brian Martin and members of PhD Candidates Date: 09/02/2020 Time: 11:30 AM Canberra, Melbourne, Sydney Register NOW: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_aA-y9bEaQKKO4fTdu_oVxw

Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing Zoom is the leader in modern enterprise video communications, with an easy, reliable cloud platform for video and audio conferencing, chat, and webinars across mobile, desktop, and room systems. Zoom Rooms is the original software-based conference room solution used around the world in board, conference, huddle, and training rooms, as well as executive offices and classrooms. Founded in 2011, Zoom helps businesses and organizations bring their teams together in a frictionless environment to get more done. Zoom is a publicly traded company headquartered in San Jose, CA. zoom.us

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

But there is poetry in these lethal paragraphs of RNA H/t @quay_dr @MartinaSisters Where have the poets of this world gone? Why have rhymes bent to reason and quills been put aside to crumble ? What feeble mind thinks yet does not imagine possibilities of other minds too? Minds seek minds within what we all wonder

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

The question of //Pathos// has disturbed the search for the next missing part of this data set. Never a better reason to interrupt seeking is finding a question linked to the heart. Knowing love is a perennial concern. To leave souls behind has a sharp gravitas. Back to the data. In 2023 Holmes attempted <> methods,with his Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, ...as evidence that the 60 viruses submitted as part of a preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of WIV, were complete... https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01240-24 ...but only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Only 154 of those are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know... this thread tests these assumptions & knowledge claims. Note important under examined bioinformatics data: ...with this current GI series of 154 submissions is interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824394 <> anyone can do this... https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824394 Bingo GI 1769824394 <> ! Again ORF8 and RdRp are here but for <> the S gene is missing. Why? So <> is the next missing data point for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health 's & @Sydney_Uni's Prof Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of@NLM_NIH NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8 and now five missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824498 ORF8 gene is there but suppressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824394 but no S gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan of a total of 15 missing... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei of 11 S genes left out of this study. Why? <> S gene is missing Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023@COVIDSelectdisclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824392!

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9201_Hubei ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9201_Hubei RNA-dependent RNA polyme - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9201_Hubei ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@gdemaneuf There is a theory that Drosten changed his mind…or was more free to speak his mind…after Shi made it out of China recently…nice idea. People. People do what people do…they fall in love and do stupid and sometimes inspirational things.

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

In 2023 Holmes attempted <> methods appropriate of bioweapons investigations, see @CharlesRixey ...with Eddie's Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, here: ...as evidence that the 60 viruses submitted as part of a preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of WIV, were complete... https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01240-24 ...but only 163 of a potential 180 sequences were part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus But only 154 of these are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know... this thread tests these assumptions & knowledge claims. //Note important under examined bioinformatics data: ...with this current GI series of 154 submissions is interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. /// KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824392 <> anyone can do this... even @stgoldst or perhaps @tgof137 @VICENews @ChrisCillizza @zerohedge even? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824392 GI 1769824392 <> all good GI 1769824390 <> all good GI 1769824390 <> BINGO! Again ORF8 and RdRp are here but for <> the S gene is missing. Why? So <> is the next missing data point for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health 's & @Sydney_Uni 's Prof Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of @NLM_NIH NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8... and now six missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824496 ORF8 gene is there but both suppressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824388 but no S gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan identified of a total of 15 missing... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs151199_Hunan identified of 11 S genes left out of this study. Why? <> S gene is missing Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023 @COVIDSelect disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824386!

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151239_Hunan ORF8 gene, complete cd - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151199_Hunan RNA-dependent RNA poly - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151199_Hunan ORF8 gene, complete cd - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@CharlesRixey - Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) 🐭

Linked below is an article written by LtCol Joseph Murphy, the person who leaked the DEFUSE proposal to me, which DRASTIC then analyzed and released on September 20th & 21st, 2021. 🧵 https://brownstone.org/articles/the-biodefense-oligarchy-and-its-demographic-defeats/

The Biodefense Oligarchy and Its Demographic Defeats ⋆ Brownstone Institute Two decades ago, factions argued that biowarfare threats were so significant that biodefense responsibility needed to be removed from the purview of the uniformed military and placed within NIAID under NIH and under HHS. brownstone.org

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

As science is very important... https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.01240-24methods H/t @sciencecohen @hholdenthorp @ScienceMagazine Holmes attempted <> methods, appropriate of biological warfare investigations, with Eddie's Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, here: He was trying to demonstrate that 60 viruses submitted to GenBank as part of a 2018 preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of Wuhan Institute of Virology, were complete... https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Interestingly only 163 of a potential 180 sequences, with ORF8, S & RdRp available for each, were said to be part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? Bioinformatics https://breakingdefense.com/2022/02/cyber-can-now-create-biowarfare-effects-without-a-bioweapon/ and cyberbiosecurity are important science too. But only 154 of these are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know... this thread tests these assumptions & knowledge claims...lets do some <> searching together. //Note important under examined bioinformatics data: framing this data set...with this current GI series of 154 submissions interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? Finding the missing data set will help demonstrate what could have happened. GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. /// KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824386 <> anyone can do this... even? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824392 GI 1769824386 <> all good GI 1769824384 <> all good GI 1769824382 <> all good note last of the S Gene in this series GI 1769824380 <> all good GI 1769824378 <> all good GI 1769824376 <> all good GI 1769824374 <> all good GI 1769824372 <> all good GI 1769824370 <> all good GI 1769824368 <> all good GI 1769824366 <> all good GI 1769824364 <> all good GI 1769824362 <> all good GI 1769824360 <> all good GI 1769824358 <> all good GI 1769824356 <> all good GI 1769824354 <> BINGO! Finally! Again ORF8 and RdRp are here but for <> the S gene is missing. Why? So GI 1769824354 <> is the next missing data point for <> GenBank submission from @syd_health &@Sydney_UniProf Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of@NLM_NIH NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8... and now seven missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824436 ORF8 gene is there but both suppressed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824354 but no S gene in this GI series Why? Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan identified of a total of 15 missing...3 to go... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs151199_Hunan 7) Rs8548_Guangdong identified of 11 S genes left out of this study...4 to go! <> S gene is missing Why? All this so far indicates that the 2023@COVIDSelectdisclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824352! Wonder what we will find...especially when we next seek out the known duplicates in <> and <>? Duplication can mean missing, and missing mean unverified in Dual Use Research of Concern field...where one the uses is Biological Warfare and the other is fairweather thinking Science as usual? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17687-3

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Cyber can now create biowarfare effects, without a bioweapon - Breaking Defense The digitization of medicine and biomedical research has been a boon for medical breakthroughs, but comes at a cost. From ransomware attacks at hospitals to intellectual property breaches at research centers, cybersecurity is now a major concern in the medical world. In the following op-ed, three experts at the intersection of national security and health policy lay out the worryingly diverse ways the global healthcare system is at risk, and why it should concern the defense community.  The worst biological warfare scenarios remain in the realm of nightmares and science fiction. From developing pathogens to finding an appropriate vector, the process of weaponizing biological agents is fraught with challenges. Without discounting the well-documented history of biowarfare and the very real threat of novel weaponized biological agents in the future — particularly as gene editing and designer molecules revolutionize the field — real hurdles remain. It’s dangerous, and the effects are difficult to predict and control. But what if it was possible to create bioweapon effects, without having to actually use a bioweapon? That’s no longer a hypothetical. The digitization, automation, and networking of biomedical and public health information may mean that cyber tools can be used to achieve biowarfare effects that were previously unrealistic or impractical. Perhaps the most glaring wake-up call is the use of social media tools to spread and amplify misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines, contributing to viral illness and death of US citizens. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how our public health is vulnerable to direct manipulation by malicious actors in the cyber domain. 2020 saw a 200% rise in healthcare cyber-attacks, and the upward trend continues. Networked data is increasingly the backbone of our entire medical system: initial R&D/experimental biomedical research, treatment development, clinical trial data, drug supply chains, the equipment used in treatment, individual health records, and personal fitness tracking. Manipulation or theft of R&D and clinical trial data drugs, devices and treatments can invalidate results or sow doubts about their reliability, hamstringing or confounding scientific studies in response to public health crises and making people sick. The clinical R&D landscape is evolving: Growth in team-based translational science is bringing research scientists, systems thinkers, analytic boundary crossers, and business developers together across global communications architectures faster than ever. And as a result, the threat surface is growing as well. RELATED: How To Build A Better Policy For Countering WMD Threats Supply chain interference can cause widespread disruption in critical medical care or can target delivery to specific populations for more tailored effects. The sophisticated global cyber campaign targeting the COVID-19 vaccine supply chain (specifically the “cold chain”) is a striking example, but is by no means a unique event. It is part of a larger trend, in which hackers have shifted their focus in recent years to increasingly target pharmaceutical and medical supply chains. These are attractive ransomware targets for the lucrative prices they command precisely because they threaten the delivery of critical lifesaving drugs and therapies. These same supply chain vulnerabilities can be exploited by actors whose goal is not financial gain but biological damage. Hospitals and healthcare facilities are vulnerable as well. Critical life-saving machinery and devices — infusion pumps, defibrillators, ventilators, dialysis machines, and active patient monitoring devices — can be breached by both insider and external threats. Access to cyber tools can give actors the ability to disrupt, delay, or deny treatment, manipulating critical health outcomes for patients, even life or death. The ability to hold patients’ health at risk is what has made this such an appealing and profitable target for ransomware. And the COVID-19 Pandemic has shown us that these breaches are now a common occurrence. As health records and personal fitness data are increasingly specific, detailed, digitized, and shared across devices platforms, and databases, they become vulnerable. Health record breaches alone rose 300% from 2018 to 2021. Our ever-growing volume of personal health information can be harvested and even manipulated to affect specific individuals, or aggregated to target populations by race, age, gender, location, socioeconomic status, medical condition, or any number of other factors depending on the malicious actor’s goal. The blending of the biological and cyber domains suggests that we need to prepare differently for the threat of biological warfare if we are to properly defend our population. The most difficult task is changing our fundamental model of boundaries between clinical research, bio-surveillance, care delivery, and individual devices. DoD has an important leadership role to play in driving, coordinating, and overseeing this change. To start, we must embrace the same principles required by any other type of complex cyber supply chain which, according to NIST [PDF], requires that we: 1) assume our systems will be breached and consider recovery and mitigation up-front, 2) establish collaborative and cross-organizational governance organized by use case with clinical and business owners at the forefront, backed by security experts, and 3) remember that a risk anywhere in the entire chain can impact any link — it may not be your responsibility contractually, but it will be your problem in reality. In the clinical cyber supply chain, the individual software systems receive most of the focus, but it is the rapidly changing interconnections where breaches happen most often — so working together to adjust perceived systems boundaries and overall mental models must be a continual task. The community of interest – which includes scientists, pharmaceutical companies, medical technology developers and manufacturers, academics, cyber security professionals, national defense professionals, and patients – is far-reaching, fragmented, and stove-piped. We must undertake a holistic reevaluation of biological warfare defense in the context of a changing and networked public health ecosystem. Katherine Hasty is a US Air Force veteran and director of Future Warfare at Long Term Strategy Group. Dr. Janie L. Gittleman is executive director for Global Health Innovation at ManTech International and a former Senior Health Advisor to the Defense Intelligence Agency Surgeon General. Edward F. O’Connor is a Subject Matter Expert with ManTech’s Health Division and a former CIO of Central Health and the Community Care Collaborative.   breakingdefense.com
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151239_Hunan ORF8 gene, complete cd - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8548_Guangdong RNA-dependent RNA po - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8548_Guangdong ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Origin and cross-species transmission of bat coronaviruses in China - Nature Communications Bats are presumed reservoirs of diverse coronaviruses (CoVs) including progenitors of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19. However, the evolution and diversification of these coronaviruses remains poorly understood. Here we use a Bayesian statistical framework and a large sequence data set from bat-CoVs (including 630 novel CoV sequences) in China to study their macroevolution, cross-species transmission and dispersal. We find that host-switching occurs more frequently and across more distantly related host taxa in alpha- than beta-CoVs, and is more highly constrained by phylogenetic distance for beta-CoVs. We show that inter-family and -genus switching is most common in Rhinolophidae and the genus Rhinolophus. Our analyses identify the host taxa and geographic regions that define hotspots of CoV evolutionary diversity in China that could help target bat-CoV discovery for proactive zoonotic disease surveillance. Finally, we present a phylogenetic analysis suggesting a likely origin for SARS-CoV-2 in Rhinolophus spp. bats. Bats are a likely reservoir of zoonotic coronaviruses (CoVs). Here, analyzing bat CoV sequences in China, the authors find that alpha-CoVs have switched hosts more frequently than betaCoVs, identify a bat family and genus that are highly involved in host-switching, and define hotspots of CoV evolutionary diversity. nature.com

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @alisonannyoung With ongoing cyberbiosecurity issues the whole time! The problem of knowledge silos within and between cybersecurity and bio world continues throughout this period from 2008 to NOW! Still now… Why?

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

My application for SAGO at @WHO was rejected...but it was in volunteer capacity and so I simply continued to help where I can. https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2496/Combatting_Corruption_Among_Civil_Servants_-_Interdisciplinary_Perspectives_on_What_Works.pdf My skill sets are listening...catching...and surprise...not simplicity H/t @CharlesRixey Umberto Eco said it well. If it is too complicated, read more books. But he wrote this type of thing in Italian, so don't see these ideas as complexity, see them as language. Teaching a language takes time and repetition...about two years of immersion...or you can nowadays Gronk your way through? The lived experience here is of an INCOMPLETE data set...so obviously I cannot fully explain the data...but you can join me on the journey. Surprise! Truth is important...but it takes a lot of listening to hear certain truths...trauma adds more layers of humanity and so our souls are stretched thinly as we listen to the person within the cyborg of text based embodiment twisting under the weight of the unknown...but knowable: <> LtCol Joe Murphy US Marines https://brownstone.org/author/joe-murphy/ In this space and habits of removed and gone...Holmes blinked and attempted <> methods, appropriate to biological warfare investigations, with Eddie's Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, here: Why? Good question, ask him. He says he was trying to demonstrate that 60 viruses submitted to GenBank as part of a 2018 preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of Wuhan Institute of Virology, were complete... https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Interestingly only 163 of a potential 180 sequences, with ORF8, S & RdRp available for each, were said to be part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? But only 154 of these are in the current GI series available to be recovered... as far as I know...and I don't know everything...I am seeking the answers to fairly obvious questions. This thread tests these assumptions & knowledge claims... So lets do some <> searching together! // Forensic note: important under examined bioinformatics data is framing this data set...with this current GI series of 154 submissions interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original earlier GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? Finding the missing data set will help demonstrate what could have happened. GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. /// KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824352 <> anyone can do this... even you? But if you cannot, what does this say about how easy it is to make a mistake in a DURC program? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824352 GI 1769824352 <> all good, all three, ORF8, RdRp and S genes present. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615857.1?report=genbank GI 1769824350 <> all good too https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615856.1?report=genbank GI 1769824348 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615855.1?report=genbank GI 1769824346 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615854.1?report=genbank GI 1769824344 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615853.1?report=girevhist GI 1769824342 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615852.1?report=genbank GI 1769824340 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615851.1?report=genbank GI 1769824338 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615850.1?report=genbank GI 1769824336 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615849.1?report=genbank GI 1769824334 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615848.1?report=genbank GI 1769824332 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615847.1?report=genbank GI 1769824330 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615846.1?report=genbank GI 1769824328 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615845.1?report=genbank GI 1769824326 <> all good https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615844.1?report=genbank GI 1769824324 <> BINGO!!!! @MonaRahalkar your old friend! Finally! Again ORF8 and RdRp are here but for <> the S gene is missing. Why? So GI 1769824324 <> is the next missing data point for <> GenBank submission from@syd_health&@Sydney_UniProf Edward Holmes @EdwardCHolmes to GenBank of@NLM_NIH NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8... and now eight missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the there in two naming versions but only partly suppressed here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824434 and here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615898.1?report=girevhist but not available to GenBank search terms: <> https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus or <> https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Yu%2CP.%2C+Hu%2CB.%2C+Li%2CB.%2C+Luo%2CD.%2C+Zhu%2CG.%2C+Zhang%2CL.%2C+Holmes%2CE.C.%2C+Shi%2CZ.+and+Cui%2CJ. Strange isn't it? ORF8 gene is there again with two names but both searches for title and authors are not available again: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824324 &here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615843.1?report=girevhist If the <> linked submissions are not suppressed then these search terms should give at least two results for the ORF8 and RpRd? But in any case no S gene in this GI series for <> Why? Recap: Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan identified of a total of 15 missing...3 to go... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs151199_Hunan 7) Rs8548_Guangdong 8) RaTG13_Yunnan//Ra4991_Yunnan identified of 11 S genes left out of this study...3 to go! <> S gene is missing yet it is very important...especially the version of Ra4991 that was originally loaded on to GenBank before this current GI series was perhaps placed, cropped, edited and moved and given new ACCESSION codes. This apparently happened from Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM to 25-OCT-2019 So <> methodology requires more data. All this so far indicates that the 2023 disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824322! How to make strong knowledge claims about the origin of COVID without these data sets? Well you cannot. But Holmes gives it a go. @GrahamPerrettMP ? Any word from the relevant Ministers yet? https://www.sydney.edu.au/infectious-diseases-institute/news-and-events/news/2020/03/24/the-proximal-origin-of-sars-cov-2.html

Archive - U.S. Agency for International Development 2012-2017.usaid.gov
Joe Murphy, Author at Brownstone Institute Joe Murphy is a lieutenant colonel in the US Marines with 16+ years of service. brownstone.org
Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8460_Guangdong ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8460_Guangdong ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8363_Guangdong ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151569_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151514_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151493_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151491_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151388_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151262_Guizhou ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs141567_Guangxi ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs141455_Guangxi ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs13488_Guangxi ORF8 gene, complete c - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs13484_Guangxi ORF8 gene, complete c - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs13479_Guangxi ORF8 gene, complete c - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain RaTG13_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No items found - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No items found - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain RaTG13_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 sydney.edu.au

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@JamieMetzl @WHO I applied @WHO SAGO but didnt get in... so continued with thesis from OSINT epidemiology perspective as type of study that @mvankerkhove et al are probably not able to perform in an institutionally independent way...hope it helps.

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

<> methods, appropriate to biological warfare investigations, with Eddie's Twitter thread on March 6th 2023, here: Why? Good question, ask him. @sciencecohen <> Yep...my guess is that Jon knew about the RaTG13/Ra4991 from sick miners but decided not to or was directed not to say anything right away. H/t @R_H_Ebright 5 years ago after being on the case for 25 years... Holmes says he was trying to demonstrate that 60 viruses submitted to GenBank as part of a 2018 preprint, together with Prof Jie Cui and ZLShi of Wuhan Institute of Virology, were complete...but they are obviously incomplete. https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus Only 163 of a potential 180 sequences, with ORF8, S & RdRp available for each, were said to be part of this 12-JUL-2018 PrePrint? But bioinformatics analysis is important to these knowledge claims, H/t Trevor Bedford @trvrbonly ...and only 154 of these are in the current GenBank GI series available to be recovered...as far as I know...and I don't know everything...I am seeking the answers to fairly obvious questions...like why were these 180 GenBank submissions not available when WIV frist published post COVID outbreak discovery? https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.22.914952v2.full.pdf This thread tests these assumptions & knowledge claims... So lets do some <> bioinformatics philosophy of science searching together! // Important Forensic note: important under examined bioinformatics data is framing this data set...with this current GI series of 154 submissions interrupted by submissions dated 25-OCT-2019 and the ACCESSION series continuing from the last, with <> to <> which is unrelated but dated Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615993.1?report=girevhist This suggests that the original earlier GenBank submission, perhaps actually of 180 sequences, was cropped to 163 and given new ACCESSION numbers one year after it was submitted...with the cropped series of 163 placed in their current GI position on 25-OCT-2019...but what of the missing 9 ORF8 from this GI series? Finding the missing data set will help demonstrate what could have happened. GI count is hypothesized as a way of delineating this Undone Science data set. /// KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost thread GI is next after 1769824324 <> anyone can do this... even you? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824352 GI 1769824322 <> all good, all three, ORF8, RdRp and S genes present. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615842.1?report=genbank GI 1769824320 <> all good too https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615842.1?report=genbank GI 1769824318 <> all good https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615840.1?report=genbank GI 1769824316 <> all good but remember that the full sequence of Rs5725_Yunnan was available for the thesis <> of WIV but for <> only the ORF8, RdRp & S gene were available. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615839.1?report=genbank Remember that GI 1769824315 is where this GI series ends with <> Submitted (25-JUL-2018) and placed Oct 25, 2019 06:16 PM together with this GI series? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824315 Finally! NOW tally is still twelve missing ORF8... and now eight missing S genes... where for <> RdRp is the last to be found with this GI count there in two naming versions but only partly suppressed here: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824434and here https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615898.1?report=girevhistbut not available to GenBank search terms: <> https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirusor <> https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Yu%2CP.%2C+Hu%2CB.%2C+Li%2CB.%2C+Luo%2CD.%2C+Zhu%2CG.%2C+Zhang%2CL.%2C+Holmes%2CE.C.%2C+Shi%2CZ.+and+Cui%2CJ. Strange isn't it? ORF8 gene is there again with two names but both searches for title and authors are not available again: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824324 &here https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615843.1?report=girevhist If the <> linked submissions are not suppressed then these search terms should give at least two results for the ORF8 and RpRd? But in any case no S gene in this GI series for <> Why? Recap: Missing ORF8 tally so far: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan identified of a total of 15 missing...3 to go... Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs151199_Hunan 7) Rs8548_Guangdong 8) RaTG13_Yunnan//Ra4991_Yunnan identified of 11 S genes left out of this study...3 to go! <> S gene is missing yet it is very important...especially the version of Ra4991 that was originally loaded on to GenBank before this current GI series was perhaps placed, cropped, edited and moved and given new ACCESSION codes. This apparently happened from Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM to 25-OCT-2019 So <> methodology requires more data. All this so far indicates that the 2023 disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete... How to make strong knowledge claims about the origin of COVID without these data sets? Well you cannot. But Holmes gives it a go. To find the rest of the missing data points we need to examine the 180 potential for the 3 S and 3 OFRF8 missing. It is so easy to make mistakes with this type of count and so checking and rechecking with different methodologies is important. This is the complex ground of the information domain. I have to back track and see if I have missed a thread in the GI series? This is why I have left this trail of pebbles...so I can back track when needed. https://brownstone.org/articles/the-biodefense-oligarchy-and-its-demographic-defeats/

Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8460_Guangdong ORF8 gene, complete - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs160665_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete c - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs160665_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete c - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rf5511_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs5725_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Infantis strain FSIS170229 - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No items found - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain RaTG13_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA polym - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No items found - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No items found - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain RaTG13_Yunnan ORF8 gene, complete cds - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Biodefense Oligarchy and Its Demographic Defeats ⋆ Brownstone Institute Two decades ago, factions argued that biowarfare threats were so significant that biodefense responsibility needed to be removed from the purview of the uniformed military and placed within NIAID under NIH and under HHS. brownstone.org

@R_H_Ebright - Richard H. Ebright

Five years ago today, a scientist stated publicly that data were consistent with a lab origin: "Ebright tells Science...that the 2019-nCoV data are 'consistent with entry into the human population as either a natural accident or a laboratory accident.'" https://www.science.org/content/article/mining-coronavirus-genomes-clues-outbreak-s-origins

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@R_H_Ebright @ScienceMagazine Further...as much as Holmes has stated that data from Jie Cui was not linked to WIV 162 of 163 submissions to GenBank remain suppressed or missing...with other serious data integrity issues and cyber biosecurity issues needing to be addressed... Disqualifying conflict of…

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

@_everythingism @AceBearstrom @hiltzikm STS studies regularly acknowledge and explore institutional limits to knowledge away from the political narratives you outline here. <<Undone Science Social Movements, Mobilized Publics, and Industrial Transitions By David J. Hess>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262529495/undone-science/ Since this research…

Undone Science A theoretical integration of science and technology studies and social movement studies that finds both common ground and “undone” research.As the fields... mitpress.mit.edu

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

This is where I lost count! Doh! Next GI will have to start from here and be inserted into current tally. GI 1769824546 restart count again here...and insert missing into tally KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI is 1769824546 <> anyone can do this... even you? But if you cannot, or if you lose count so easily, like I always do...what does this say about how easy it is to make a mistake in a DURC program? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824546 GI 1769824546 <> all good, all three, ORF8, RdRp and S genes present. Next GI 1769824544 <> & RdRp are there but suppressed but ORF8 is already 5) on the tally https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615953.1?report=genbank GI 1769824542 <> & RdRp are there but suppressed but ORF8 is should be 6) on the tally not 7) as I must have started counting GI from the RdRp list here? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615952.1?report=genbank GI 1769824540 <> & RdRp are there but should be 7) on the list not 9)? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615951.1?report=genbank GI 1769824538 <> & RdRp are there but should be 8) and is missing! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615951.1?report=genbank Lets keep going to the next one... GI 1769824536 <> & RdRp & ORF8 are there https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615949.1?report=genbank GI 1769824534 <> & RdRp & ORF8 are there https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824534 GI 1769824532 <> & RdRp but missing ORF8 should be 9) on the list not 12) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824532 GI 1769824530 <> & RdRp & ORF8 are there all good https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824530 GI 1769824528 <> & RdRp but ORF8 missing should be 10) on tally not 11) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824528 GI 1769824526 <> & RdRp & ORF8 all good https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824526 GI 1769824524 is <> so S & RdRp & ORF8 all good https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824524 GI 1769824522 is <> so S & RdRp & ORF8 all good https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824522 GI 1769824520 is <> all good GI 1769824518 is <> all good GI 1769824516 is <> all good GI 1769824514 is <> all good GI 1769824512 is <> all good GI 1769824510 is <> ORF8 missing 1) on tally GI 1769824508 is <> all good GI 1769824506 is <> all good GI 1769824504 is <> all good GI 1769824502 is <> all good GI 1769824500 is <> is tricky missing S gene 1) in tally not 4) missing but RdRp and ORF8 OK https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615936.1?report=genbank GI 1769824498 is <> again missing S gene 2) not 5) in tally, but RdRp & ORF8 are good. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615930.1?report=genbank GI 1769824496 is <> again missing S gene 3) not 6) in tally, but RdRp & ORF8 are good. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615930.1?report=genbank GI 1769824494 is <> all good GI 1769824492 is <> ORF8 is missing 2) in tally GI 1769824490 is <> all good GI 1769824488 is <> all good GI 1769824486 is <> all good GI 1769824484 is <> all good GI 1769824482 is <> dare I say BINGO!!! <> RdRp is there https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615922.1?report=girevhist but ORF8 is missing number 11) and S is missing number 4) NOW tally is still fourteen missing ORF8... and still nine missing S genes... Recap: Missing ORF8 tally so far with order fixed: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Ra7909_Yunnan prev Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Rspp7905_Yunnan prev Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7931_Yunnan prev Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rs6266_Yunnan prev Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rs6303_Yunnan prev Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rf130223-29_Beijing prev Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rs6266_Yunnan identified of a total of 15 missing...1 to go? Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rs9214_Hubei prev Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rs9201_Hubei prev Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rs151199_Hunan prev Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rf130223-29_Beijing prev Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs151199_Hunan 7) Rs8548_Guangdong 8) RaTG13_Yunnan//Ra4991_Yunnan identified of 11/11 S genes left out of this study... <> S gene is missing yet it is very important...especially the version of Ra4991 that was originally loaded on to GenBank before this current GI series was perhaps placed, cropped, edited and moved and given new ACCESSION codes. This apparently happened from Jul 13, 2019 08:18 PM to 25-OCT-2019 So <> methodology requires more data. All this so far indicates that the 2023 disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is GI 1769824322! How to make strong knowledge claims about the origin of COVID without these data sets? Well you cannot. This tally is nice and messy at the moment...I will need to clean it up in the next post! Counting from GI 1769824482 <> and smoothing out the tally. A stuff up in a GI count like this is character building, but also gives an insight into the lived experience of bioinformatics of Virology. How could this type of thing but constantly happening an STILL there is an attitude that errors are not common. What bullshit! They happen all the time! Like @sciencecohen who details DNA of SARS-CoV-2 instead of RNA. We are all people doing people stuff...stuff-ups too. https://www.science.org/content/article/mining-coronavirus-genomes-clues-outbreak-s-origins

Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs8363_Guangdong spike protein (S) ge - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rspp7924_Yunnan spike protein (S) gen - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Ra7909_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rspp7905_Yunnan spike protein (S) gen - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rspp7905_Yunnan spike protein (S) gen - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs5725_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs160665_Yunnan spike protein (S) gen - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6266_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6255_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs6303_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rf5511_Yunnan spike protein (S) gene, - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs161465_Guangdong RNA-dependent RNA - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs161419_Guangdong RNA-dependent RNA - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs151334_Guizhou RNA-dependent RNA po - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9201_Hubei RNA-dependent RNA polyme - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs9201_Hubei RNA-dependent RNA polyme - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

Next one? <> no ORF8 found in @NLM_NIH GenBank <>, complete cds is there but suppressed... GenBank: MH615955.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615955.1?report=genbank <> GenBank: MH615905.1 is there but suppressed... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615905.1?report=genbank ...so that is NOW four missing ORF8; all with S and RdRp available but suppressed; 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi Were these in the 60-54=6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this PrePrint ? https://web.archive.org/web/20220809085043/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=Spread+and+Geographic+Structure+of+SARS-related+Coronaviruses+in+++++++++++++Bats+and+the+Origin+of+Human+SARS+Coronavirus ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series in GenBank? https://news.clearancejobs.com/2019/08/15/weaponizing-medicine-chinas-latest-theft-a-potential-biological-weapon/ Who knows? @COVIDSelect @COVIDSelectDems ? @R_H_Ebright

Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs141456_Guangxi spike protein (S) ge - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rs141456_Guangxi RNA-dependent RNA po - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Spread and Geographic Structure of SARS-related Coronaviruses in Bats - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube web.archive.org
Weaponizing Medicine: China's Latest Theft a Potential Biological Weapon A Canadian research lab sent deadly virus strains to China under the guise of scientific advancement. Now a Chinese lab scientist has been dismissed and Canadian law enforcement investigates. - Intelligence news.clearancejobs.com

@tommy_cleary - Tommy Cleary

Censorship of the nature deployed in the case of COVID had some obvious negative effects...but some were not so bad. @BiosafetyNow https://biosafetynow.substack.com/p/censoring-virology It was nice and quiet. The people censored had to find ways to reach out to each other...the phenomenology was that we had to look at what we were looking through. It also builds a compassion for a data set you are auditing during verification and for your own findings...a health doubt...need to double check and have peers that are brutal not lazy. Fixing this mess is going to be fun! Some wisdom always comes from a moment of stupidity and reflection. KISS Methods: basic GI series analysis this Xpost GI 1769824482 <> anyone can do this... even you? But if you cannot, or if you lose count so easily, like I always do...what does this say about how easy it is to make a mistake in a DURC program? https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1769824482 Starting with next RdRp GI 1769824480 is <> all good GI 1769824478 is <> S gene misssssing BBBBBingo! S gene missing no 5) in tally more BLAST homework here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615920.1?report=genbank Couple more to find! GI 1769824476 <> all good GI 1769824474 <> all good GI 1769824472 <> all good GI 1769824470 <> all good GI 1769824468 <> all good GI 1769824466 <> all good GI 1769824464 <> all good GI 1769824462 <> ORF8 missing number 3) GI 1769824460 <> all good GI 1769824458 <> all good GI 1769824456 <> all good GI 1769824454 <> all good GI 1769824452 <> all good GI 1769824450 <> all good GI 1769824448 <> missing ORF8 tally number 4) GI 1769824446 <> all good GI 1769824444 <> all good GI 1769824442 <> all good GI 1769824440 <> all good GI 1769824438 <> all good GI 1769824436 <> missing S number 6) not 7) GI 1769824434 <> missing S number 7) prev 8) GI 1769824432 <> Binnnngooooo RdRp good, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MH615897.1?report=genbank missing S number 7) & ORF8 missing number 12) with complete genome available on CNCB from June 2021 https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/biosample/browse/SAMC346732 NOW tally is still a mess Recap: Missing ORF8 tally so far with order fixed: 1) Rs151334_Guizhou 2) Rf131405_Shanxi 3) Rs140400_Guangdong 4) Rs141456_Guangxi 5) Rspp7924_Yunnan 6) Ra7909_Yunnan prev Rspp7921_Yunnan 7) Rspp7905_Yunnan prev Ra7909_Yunnan 8) Rspp7931_Yunnan prev Rspp7907_Yunnan 9) Rs6266_Yunnan prev Rspp7905_Yunnan 10) Rs6303_Yunnan prev Rspp7896_Yunnan 11) Rf130223-29_Beijing prev Rs6303_Yunnan 12) Rspp7952_Yunnan prev Rs6266_Yunnan 13) 14) 15) identified of a total of 15 missing Question: Was <> in the 60-54= 6 ORF8 that <> decided to leave out of this 2018 PrePrint... ...or perhaps the 54-45= 9 ORF8 that are simply missing from the GI series suppressed in GenBank & interrupted by the date 25-Oct-2019? With S genes missing too; of the 60 RdRp sampled only 49 S genes are here in this GI series... Why? 1) Rs9214_Hubei prev Rspp7921_Yunnan 2) Rs9201_Hubei prev Rspp7907_Yunnan 3) Rs151199_Hunan prev Rspp7896_Yunnan 4) Rf130223-29_Beijing prev Rs9214_Hubei 5) Rp8794_Guangdong prev Rs9201_Hubei 6) Rs8548_Guangdong prev Rs151199_Hunan 7) RaTG13_Yunnan RNA-dependent prev Rs8548_Guangdong 8) Rspp7952_Yunnan prev RaTG13_Yunnan//Ra4991_Yunnan 9) 10) 11) identified of 11 S genes left out of this study... <> S gene is missing So <> methodology requires more data. All this so far indicates that the 2023 disclosures of Holmes are potentially incomplete...but the count continues... next search is from GI 1769824432! How to make strong knowledge claims about the origin of COVID without these data sets? Well you cannot. This tally is nice and messy at the moment...I will need to continue to clean it up in the next post! Counting from GI 1769824432 <> and smoothing out the tally. Eventually it may be clearer than bee shit https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/cia-rdp90-00965r000403600002-0

Censoring virology "On reading," by Simon Wain-Hobson, is a weekly discussion of scientific papers and news articles around gain of function research in virology. biosafetynow.substack.com
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rf130223-29_Beijing RNA-dependent RNA - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rp8794_Guangdong RNA-dependent RNA po - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Record suppressed: Bat SARS-like coronavirus strain Rspp7952_Yunnan RNA-dependent RNA pol - Nucleotide - NCBITwitterFacebookLinkedInGitHubNCBI Insights BlogTwitterFacebookYoutube ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Browse - BioSample - CNCB-NGDC ngdc.cncb.ac.cn
THE 'BEE FECES' THEORY UNDONE | CIA FOIA (foia.cia.gov) cia.gov

@a_kruschke - A.Kruschke

@tommy_cleary @JAHawk94684 @MartinaSisters @mlperk1 @MonaRahalkar @R_H_Ebright @quay_dr @BiosafetyNow @syd_health @SystemsVirology @NLM_NIH @POTUS @Sydney_Uni @DrJBhattacharya @FloDebarre @institutpasteur @thackerpd @Rebecca21951651 @capitolsheila @BillyBostickson @breakfast_dogs @Globalbiosec @gdemaneuf @RdeMaistre @dasher8090 @COVIDSelect @GrahamPerrettMP @harishseshadri2 @emilyakopp @Ayjchan @VBruttel @CharlesRixey @sciencecohen @hholdenthorp @ScienceMagazine @WHO @reSeeIt save Thread

Saved - February 15, 2025 at 5:44 AM

@karma44921039 - karma

Dr Naomi Wolfe . “They tried to kill us….They tried to sterilise us https://t.co/Oh4ZqR4YIj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, particularly targeting women and babies. The documents show they killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm count, all while being fully aware of these consequences. There are charts detailing the injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles. Their research concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. This information was given to Dr. Walensky, yet she still recommended the COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. This is a satanic act on a massive scale. The Pfizer executives knew what they were doing, which is evident in the thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births. They tried to kill us, wipe us out, and sterilize us. Despite the deaths and fertility struggles, we survived, and the truth has come to light.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The centerpiece of the Pfizer papers is an intentional attack on human sexuality and and especially on women and babies. They killed the babies and they knew it. They poisoned the breast milk and they knew it. They damaged the placentas and they knew it. They lowered the sperm count and they knew it. They they they have a chart of the babies they're injuring. They have a chart of the women's menstrual cycles that they're disrupting. They concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal exposure to the vaccine. And this is the document that went to doctor Walensky, and then she gave a press conference saying, you've gotta, you know, get a a vaccine COVID vaccine before, during, or after your pregnancy. So this is satanic. Right? This is satanic on a on a massive level. And you look at Borla and and you look at, you know, the fact that they knew they were doing this, which if you read the Pfizer papers, you cannot conclude otherwise, in in this thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births. So I guess what I'm trying to say is they tried to kill us. You know, they tried to wipe us out. They tried to sterilize us. A lot of people died. There's gonna be horrible struggles with fertility, but we survived and the truth came out.
Saved - February 18, 2025 at 6:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I called out someone for waiting until my previous account was suspended to challenge me, and I was ready to confront them and their team. They tried to shift the debate off Twitter, which frustrated me. I suggested revealing personal information about certain individuals involved. I also noted how their egos betray them, and I pointed out a crucial omission in their response that shouldn't be overlooked.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

You also admitted to intentionally waiting until my previous account was suspended, and you’d nuked widescale access to the very receipts I’ve been exposing to fucking destroy you, before stepping up to the plate, bitch. Then you wait until I’m asleep last night to talk shit and challenge me to a space, acting like I wouldn’t take you up immediately. I wake up, accept your challenge and then schedule it same-day, all while being fully prepared to go at your whole fucking squad by myself… from memory. And then at the last moment, you act like we’re in some Central Banker board room and you wanna take the shit completely off TwitterX. My patience is wearing quite thin with you.✌️ Here’s an idea: How about we just doxx Andrew Witty’s whole fucking crew and his family, and tell him you’re the reason instead? Chris Gent’s too. And Deighton. How’s that sound?

@canceledmouse - Canceled Mouse 🐭

@HolaBackupFiJC I agreed to your guys controlling the mic' already. I'm simply asking for a platform with video & screen share. Which is most standard ; none does "debate on X" aside for this microcosm. God knows why you would want to do that in these glitching craps from Melon-Usk. 1h30.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Their egos always give them away. They just can’t help themselves. I’m truly amazed we’ve continued to put up with it for this long. *NOTE: Pay close attention here to what Canceledmouse did NOT say in the reply post below, which is the most important piece and super easy to miss… “Who are those people?”

@canceledmouse - Canceled Mouse 🐭

@HolaBackupFiJC When have I admitted to have waited for your account to be nuked ? I had never heard of you before to engage you. Entertain me more, please.

Saved - February 22, 2025 at 12:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to give a huge shout-out to my son Mason, who has been my rock since I became paralyzed from the neck down three years ago due to the Moderna Covid-19 shot. His support has kept me going, especially when I faced the option of medical euthanasia. I'm raising funds to hire personal support workers so I can stay at home instead of being moved to a long-term care facility. Every donation counts, and I appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you for your support.

@kcpollock - Kayla Pollock

I'd appreciate it if all of my followers could give a huge shout out to my son Mason. 3 years ago today (Jan 22nd, 2022) I woke up completely paralyzed from the neck down. Dr's confirmed it was caused by my Moderna Covid-19 shot. If not for him I would have taken the medical euthanasia they offered me three times in Canada. I would've quit life. I wouldn't be speaking up about what happened to me. He's only 10 years old. He seen his mom go through so much. He has been through so much. He is terrified that I'm gonna get moved into a long-term care facility anywhere in the province which is what happens. I need to fundraisers enough money to stay at home. The government doesn't have enough workers to help people like me they end up taking medical euthanasia or in long-term care facilities waiting to die. Help me stay home by hiring private personal support workers to help me in and out of bed get dressed cook turn in my own bed shower. I have to pee in a bag now. If you can help every donation counts, use credit card, PayPal, etransfer from any currency around the globe. opkayla.ca/donate @LichTamara @thevivafrei @liz_churchill10 @TruthSeek01011 @DrTrozzi @Fynnderella1 @DrNoMask @CartlandDavid @P_McCulloughMD @Answers4Sean @Carrie298924321 @HouseLyndseyRN @canindependent @Vets4FreeCanada @P_McCulloughMD @hubermanlab @RealGregBoulden @ClydeDoSomethin @JanciToxDoc @DocAhmadMalik @JimFergusonUK @CrysMcN1 @Freedomforall98 @jimfannon @idonbuckley @mRNAdeaths @Storiesofinjury @JesslovesMJK @KelsiBurns @docbiss @KatKanada_TM @LichTamara @liz_churchill10 @MdBreathe @React19org @DJSpeicher @Ravarora1 @RealMattA_ @RealAlexJones @truckdriverpleb @WSOnlineNews @speyer8868 @EricawithaC13

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 3:48 AM

@HolaKetty - Ketty D

@SuppressedNws @shanprevails @fijcowitz8200 wtf

Saved - April 12, 2025 at 4:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2019, I was fit until I developed a lung condition that left me struggling for over 1,900 days. Doctors diagnosed it as unfixable pulmonary fibrosis, and I felt hopeless after trying various treatments with no success. Desperate, I tried flush niacin, which helped me breathe again. Eventually, I took Ivermectin, not expecting much, but within an hour, my lung issues vanished completely. I never thought I’d regain my health, but now I feel free and restored, grateful for the unexpected solutions that changed my life.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

1/ My Ivermectin miracle. In 2019, I was in peak form-lean, strong, kind of shape people notice. Then I got sick. From Jan 20 - Apr 25, I lived with a lung condition no one could fix. Over 1,900 days believing this was forever then it was gone in under 1 hr. “Ivermectin.” 🧵

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

It started like pneumonia. But it never cleared. My lungs stayed heavy. Climbing stairs made me cough - & even vomit. Doctors said it looked like pulmonary fibrosis. Permanent. Progressive. “Unfixable.” Basically, I'm screwed forever and they can't help.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

I saw specialists. Did the tests. Tried the pills. Inhalers. Steroids. Antihistamines. Nothing worked. No answers. No solutions. Just, “This is your life now.”

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

One day, after months of suffering, I was on my knees, unable to breathe. Out of desperation, I asked my wife to get flush niacin - something a banned doctor recommended. I was reluctant but now I was willing to try anything. 15 minutes after I took it, I could breathe again.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

From that day on, I could breathe again but eventually felt like I needed it to live. It was the only thing that helped & I thought if I didn’t have it, I'd die. Flush niacin was a real therapeutic, & no doctor ever told me about it. And the guy who recommended it got banned.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

By April 2025, I’d lived with lung damage for over 1,900 days. Then I took Ivermectin. Not to fix my lungs - but to protect myself from getting sick again. I was so concerned that one more illness might kill me. It would be the end...my lungs were going to kill me.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

7/ I didn’t expect anything. But within 1 hour - everything changed. The pressure, the heaviness, the wheezing…Gone. Completely. I was in shock.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

No taper. No easing in. One dose. After being told for 5 years that I’d never improve and this was it. After believing I would never feel healthy again, play sports again or have my strengths and quality of life returned.... My lungs just cleared. Instantly.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

I didn’t think even this was possible. I thought this was my life now - lungs ruined forever. Jogging, lifting, playing hockey with my kids - gone.. But somehow, what I took out of concern…Turned out to be the cure. It cleared in an hour & it still hasn’t come back.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

Flush niacin was the therapy they buried. Ivermectin was the cure they banned.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

Not one doctor ever helped me - but one dose of what I wasn’t supposed to take? That changed my life. I never thought I’d live like this again.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

I’m not a doctor. I’m not here to debate. I’m just a guy who went from visibly fit…To broken… To free - in one hour. "Ivermectin"

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

Thank you do every Doctor who failed for opening me up to every doctor blacklisted. I thank you, I thank chance, but I thank God that my lung Health was restored, my body feels a thousand times better, I'm focused, I'm happy and I'm cured in a way everyone said was impossible.

@Humanlty1o1 - Herb Powell

@naomirwolf @RealDrJaneRuby @dockaurG @MdBreathe @MakisMD @P_McCulloughMD @PierreKory @RWMaloneMD

Saved - April 14, 2025 at 1:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion highlights a nearly 700-page review related to the FBI's investigation, revealing details from a 2017 interview with Christopher Steele. The interview notes Steele's personal animosity towards President Trump, who he referred to as his "main opponent." Steele and his partner expressed regret for going to the press in 2016. The conversation also mentions that media reports on the dossier were used in FISA applications for Trump campaign aide Carter Page, indicating "circular reporting." Steele's expense reports show a total payment request of $74,000 in July 2016.

@C__Herridge - Catherine Herridge

RUSSIAGATE BINDER Joint review nearly 700 pages @shellenberger @galexybrane FBI interview: Christopher Steele Calls President Trump “Main Opponent” 26 page FBI summary Christopher Steele 2017 interview provides more granularity about Steele’s relationship with the bureau, his personal dislike of President Trump as well as eye-popping expense reports. According to the interview, Steele and his business partner “apologized for going to the press in the fall of 2016.”  The 2016 media reports about the dossier were cited in the FBI’s FISA applications for Trump campaign aide Carter Page.  This is know as “circular reporting.” Further, Steele and his business partner “described President Trump as their ‘main opponent.’” Russiagate Binder includes Steele expense reports. July 2016 payment request documents an “Aggregate Total Paid: $74,000.00” More analysis this weekend for subscribers!

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@C__Herridge @shellenberger @galexybrane Wow

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've discovered concerning findings regarding the Moderna vaccines, including the presence of plasmid DNA and sequences related to an HIV vaccine patent. The data reveals unexpected envelope glycoprotein sequences and highlights Anthony Fauci's involvement with the gp145 sequence. My analysis suggests that HIV sequences may be present in the spike protein, potentially due to contamination. Despite challenges, I've mapped these sequences and found gaps in the original vaccine assembly. Recent updates indicate that the authors of the Re-Adenylation paper have been cooperative in clarifying these issues.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

🔥Another Contaminant Found in the Moderna Vaccines. Did you consent to getting Moderna's HIV vaccine? Parts of it are in there. The recent Re-Adenylation paper has excellent sequence of not only the m1273 vaccine after application to mice.. but it also has the plasmid DNA

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

In addition to this plasmid DNA sequence, we can see sequences that map to a Moderna patent for an HIV vaccine in development.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

As if the plasmid contamination isn't insulting enough, this envelope glycoprotein sequence has no business being in these data.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

Hey, Look at that. Anthony Fauci is an author of the gp145 sequence. @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya For full details, hit the Nepetalactone substack

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

@RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya I cant explain this. Maybe the authors will shed some light on why its in there. Its not obvious after BLASTing this sequence against all of the oligos used in their supplement. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08842-1#Sec48

Video Transcript AI Summary
RNA sequencing of the Moderna vaccine's three prime ends suggests a possible mechanism for RNA persistence: in vivo re-adenylation. The data indicates plasmid DNA contamination despite efforts to reduce it. The data also reveals contamination from other mRNA vaccines in Moderna's pipeline. The speaker suggests that with widespread DNA sequencing capabilities, tolerating incorrect RNA sizes in vaccines is irresponsible. Sequencing before approval would have allowed for a better understanding of low RNA scores before global administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: RNA Seq experiments exploring the fidelity of the three foot ends of the Moderna vaccine have given us an interesting insight into a possible mechanism of RNA persistence: re adenylation of the messages in vivo. Inadvertently, the data also demonstrates the plasmid DNA contamination despite methods that should greatly reduce DNA copy number with DNA Cy. The data also sheds light on another form of contamination in the C19 vaccines, other mRNA vaccines currently in Moderna's pipeline. With ubiquitous DNA sequencing capacity available to sequence over nine ms SARS (CoV-two genomes), it seems irresponsible for the vaccines to be tolerating RNA of the wrong size in the vaccines. Had these vaccines been sequenced prior to approval, these low RN scores would be much better understood prior to administering them to the global population.
Re-adenylation by TENT5A enhances efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines - Nature Despite the widespread use of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, little is known about the metabolism of therapeutic RNAs. Here we use nanopore sequencing1–3 to analyse individual therapeutic mRNA molecules, focusing on their poly(A) tails. We show that the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine4 has a poly(A) tail of around 100 nucleotides, followed by an mΨCmΨAG sequence. In cell lines, mRNA-1273 undergoes rapid degradation initiated by mΨCmΨAG removal, followed by CCR4–NOT-mediated deadenylation. However, in medically relevant preclinical models, particularly in macrophages, mRNA-1273 poly(A) tails are extended to up to 200 nucleotides by the TENT5A poly(A) polymerase5–7, which is induced by the vaccine. Re-adenylation, which stabilizes target mRNAs, is consistently observed in synthetic mRNAs that encode proteins targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum, such as ovalbumin or antigens from Zika virus8 or the malaria parasite9. The extent of re-adenylation varies: the BioNTech–Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine10 shows less potent re-adenylation than mRNA-1273, which correlates with a smaller proportion of membrane-associated BNT162b2. This highlights the crucial role of spatial accessibility to ER-resident TENT5A in determining re-adenylation efficiency. In vivo, TENT5A is expressed in immune cells that take up mRNA vaccine, and TENT5A deficiency reduces specific immunoglobulin production for mRNA vaccines after immunization in mice. Overall, our findings reveal a principle for enhancing the efficacy of therapeutic mRNAs, paving the way for improvement. Upon intramuscular administration, COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are primarily taken up by macrophages, in which the cellular machinery extends their poly(A) tails, thereby increasing mRNA stability and translation, providing an explanation for the efficacy of these vaccines. nature.com

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

@RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya More details here… https://anandamide.substack.com/p/why-is-a-fauci-hiv-vax-sequence-in?utm_source=substack&publication_id=456768&post_id=162261550&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&action=share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=false&r=jhcie&triedRedirect=true

Why is a Fauci HIV vax sequence in a Moderna's C19 vaccine? TENT5A and Nucleic Acid Persistence sheds light on more vaccine slop anandamide.substack.com

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

@RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya Substack went down on me so I feel its important to clarify here. Everyone remembers the Pradhan paper. There are HIV sequences in Spike. Its possible we are dealing with that and our original Moderna Reference sequences failed to assemble the 3' end of the vaccine. https://t.co/1xDcYJsBQO

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

I took the reads and also mapped them to the Moderna HIV vaccines and we only get reads covering the ends of the 4 plasmids. This suggests there are parts of these HIV sequences in the spike sequence in moderna and our Bivalent assembly in NCBI is missing them. So may have just rediscovered Pradhan due to the plasmid contamination in the Krawczyk study.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

@RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya I never thought I would be reassembling and finishing plasmid sequences from contaminating DNA reads that we pull out of patients. What a marvelous way to QC pharma products.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

@RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya See UPDATE-

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

UPDATE! More people have weighed in on this including the authors of the Re-adenylation paper. They have been very transparent and helpful. The plasmid DNA is there. The 3’UTR sequence that matches the Fauci/Moderna synthetic constructs is shared sequence between the vaccines and points to a hole in our original assembly of the Moderna vaccines. Here is how we know. Thanks to @P_J_Buckhaults for suggesting this.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

🔥Another Contaminant Found in the Moderna Vaccines. Did you consent to getting Moderna's HIV vaccine? Parts of it are in there. The recent Re-Adenylation paper has excellent sequence of not only the m1273 vaccine after application to mice.. but it also has the plasmid DNA

Saved - May 19, 2025 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I agree, especially regarding those defending certain interests. It's unfortunate you left before I could share my thoughts. Chelsea believes COVID is a modified SARS coronavirus, spliced with MERS and/or HIV, which makes it infectious in humans due to specific genetic coding.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Agree. Especially watch for the ones protecting Jewniversity and PE interests. It’s a shame you didn’t stick around to hear me. https://t.co/Bunz4VImmR

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Chelsea thinks so. COVID is a SARS coronavirus spliced with MERS and/or HIV viruses to insert their identical gp120 spike protein, coded for by 2 adjacent CGG stop codons not found in SARS viruses to make COVID infectious/pathogenic in people. 1 CGG codon in 0.3% SARS viruses. https://t.co/kuWXbG8uWz

Saved - June 17, 2025 at 1:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The discussion centers on Lou Gehrig’s Disease (ALS) and potential solutions. The Spike protein from COVID-19 may worsen ALS by inducing neuroinflammation through purinergic receptors like P2X7. Current ALS treatments are limited, prompting exploration of new targets, including purinergic modulation and boosting NAD+ levels. Researchers link elevated miR-34a to neurotoxicity in ALS, while myeloid-derived suppressor cells may influence neuroinflammation. The conversation highlights ongoing research and connections between various biological pathways related to ALS and COVID-19.

@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III

Lou Gehrig’s Disease – Are We Looking for Solutions!? Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) – also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease (or Charcot’s disease in Europe) – is characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons and leads to debilitating and potentially fatal symptoms. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10886908/ The Spike protein – whether from the virus itself or from COVID-19 injections – can induce or contribute to inflammation in the nervous system, triggering ALS or worsening the condition in people already affected. Specifically, the Spike can affect purinergic receptors, especially P2X4 and P2X7. The P2X7 receptor is particularly concerning, as it plays a central role in neuroinflammation and pain. Interestingly, P2X7 expression increases when TLR4 is stimulated by LPS (lipopolysaccharide) in microglial and astrocyte cells – both of which are part of the central nervous system (CNS). Microglia are the CNS’s resident immune cells, responsible for removing toxic threats — but they can become pro-inflammatory. P2X7 is a hallmark of this pro-inflammatory state in microglia. To note: the Spike protein interacts with LPS, potentially due to leaky gut (intestinal barrier dysfunction), and also with amyloid beta (Aβ42) fibers. These complexes — Spike/LPS or Spike/Aβ42 — can fully activate the TLR4 receptor. https://www.cureus.com/articles/218170-impact-of-the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-on-the-innate-immune-system-a-review#!/ With a compromised blood-brain barrier, these Spike-related molecular complexes can cross into the CNS, triggering TLR4, and increasing P2X7 expression. P2X7 can also be stimulated by extracellular ATP, which is released during inflammation. When there's reduced ectonucleotidase activity (particularly Ado, short for adenosine), the overexpression of P2X7 becomes dangerous. Adenosine helps break down extracellular ATP — so if Ado is low, ATP accumulates and further stimulates P2X7, ramping up inflammation. Adenosine is also tied to NAD+ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512238/ Another point: P2X7 is a gateway receptor not just for SARS-CoV-2, but also for HIV. That’s yet another similarity between these two viruses. All in all, targeting P2X7 is a promising strategy, and research is ongoing. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9877316/ Currently, the main medications approved for ALS treatment include riluzole, edaravone, and tauroursodiol/sodium phenylbutyrate. While they offer some benefits, due to ALS’s severity and the lack of a definitive cure, new pharmaceutical targets must be explored. Purinergic modulation has shown promising results in ALS management, and additional strategies could include: Anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic compounds Reducing oxidative stress Modulating neuronal ion channels One promising avenue: boosting NAD+ to provide some immediate support. Oral supplementation with NAD+ precursors like: Nicotinamide (NAM) Nicotinamide riboside (NR) Nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) …could help. These are converted into NAD+ via biosynthesis pathways inside cells. However, this is only a short-term aid if the underlying causes of NAD+ depletion aren't addressed. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512238/ Note: NAD+ is linked to SIRT1, which plays a role in maintaining intestinal barrier integrity and supporting the commensal (beneficial) gut flora. Follow Annelises work 👌 #ALS #NAD+ #NMN #SIRT1 #P2X7 #TLR4

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Long-COVID Scenario and the Therapeutic Potential of the Purinergic System in Neuromodulation Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) involves the degeneration of motor neurons and debilitating and possibly fatal symptoms. The COVID-19 pandemic directly affected the quality of life of this group, and the SARS-CoV-2 infection accelerated the ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein on the Innate Immune System: A Review The Spike protein enables the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by binding to multiple receptors, including the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Scientific studies also indicate that Spike is involved in severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), "long-haul COVID diseases" - also known as "long COVID syndromes" or "post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection" (PACS) - or, recently, in adverse reactions to lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines or other anti-COVID19 products. Numerous mutations, notably within the subunit 1 of Spike (S1), prevent neutralization by antibodies, but more generally, the virus has developed numerous strategies to avoid immune system surveillance, especially type-I interferons (IFN-I). Meanwhile, a “hyperinflammatory” state, named “cytokine storm,” sets in. However, what role does the Spike protein play in the immune escape mechanisms? Can its inflammatory activities affect IFN-I? Does Spike block IFN-I or hijack them for the virus benefits? What are the other potential consequences? This article was written to provide an up-to-date and more general overview of the impact of the Spike protein on the innate immune system and its effectors at the molecular level. cureus.com
The Role of NAD+ in Regenerative Medicine The understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of aging has grown exponentially over recent years, and it is now accepted within the scientific community that aging is a malleable process; just as it can be accelerated, it can also be slowed ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Identification of a novel P2X7 antagonist using structure-based virtual screening P2X4 and P2X7 receptors are ATP-gated ion channels, which play important roles in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, and as such they are important drug targets in diseases of inflammatory origin. While several compounds targeting P2X4 and P2X7 ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Role of NAD+ in Regenerative Medicine The understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of aging has grown exponentially over recent years, and it is now accepted within the scientific community that aging is a malleable process; just as it can be accelerated, it can also be slowed ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Oh, et bien... perturbations de la barrière hémato-encéphalique dans des cas de covid-long... et une approche d'exploration médicale envisagée. Cet article est intéressant ⤵️ https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-025-04133-4 "Notre étude suggère que l'IC PASC/covid long est au moins en partie liée à une

Asymmetrical glymphatic dysfunction in patients with long Covid associated neurocognitive impairment- correlation with BBB disruption - BMC Neurology The glymphatic system, a waste clearance pathway, has been implicated in several neurological conditions associated with neuroinflammation. COVID-19 associated neurocognitive impairment, part of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), is strongly associated with neuroinflammation and disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB). Several studies have implicated a synergistic interaction between the glymphatic system dysfunction and BBB disruption. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the role of the MRI metric diffusion along the perivascular spaces DTI (DTI-ALPS) in patients with PASC and correlated this with the BBB capillary permeability metric- K trans derived from Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) perfusion. 14 subjects with PASC who had persisting symptoms of anosmia, ageusia, fatigue, and cognitive impairment (CI) and ten healthy age and sex matched controls were recruited. All PASC subjects underwent routine and advanced MR brain imaging at two time points, (3 months +/- 2 weeks) after initial infection - referred as Time Point 1 (TP-1) - and 10 repeated the MRI scan 12 months (+/- 2 weeks) later - referred as Time Point 2 (TP-2), while the controls had MR imaging done only at TP-1. All had mild neurocognitive impairment. In the final analysis we included those who had DTI study at both time points (n-10). MR imaging included DCE perfusion and DTI in addition to anatomical imaging. Given the small size of the sample and nonnormality of data in the descriptive analyses, nonparametric analyses were used for group comparisons. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to show the differences in DTI-ALPS between the patients and controls in the predefined regions of interest. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) was used to assess the correlation between DTI-ALPS index with K trans. There was significant reduction in the DTI-ALPS index between the patients and controls in the left hemisphere (z = 2.04, p < 0.04). However, there was no significant change over time in the index. There was a strong inverse correlation between the central white matter K trans and DTI-ALPS index (rho = 0.66, p < 0.03). Our study indicates that disordered para vascular drainage, a marker for glymphatic system and BBB damage may contribute to neurocognitive impairment (NCI) among patients with PASC. The DTI-ALPS index, which does not require contrast injection, has the potential to serve as a non-invasive biomarker. bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Non seulement il stipule qu'il y a surexpression du TLR2/ TLR4 mais il ajoute qu'il y a une augmentation de l'expression du P2X7... c'est une bombe à retardement. Il y a une reprogrammation du SI, sur le long-terme, particulièrement au niveau des macrophages. 24/n

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Bien, résumé de la partie 1 : SIRT1 inhibe p53 pour éviter l'apoptose cellulaire. Et p53 inhibe SIRT1 via miR-34a pour exercer son activité, créant une boucle d'amplification apoptotique. Bizarrement, on retrouve une stimulation de p53 après les injections anti-covid dans les

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Maladie de Charcot, on cherche des solutions !? La sclérose latérale amyotrophique (SLA) - ou maladie de Charcot - se caractérise par une dégénérescence des motoneurones et des symptômes invalidants, potentiellement mortels. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10886908/ La Spike, celle du virus ET des injections anti-covid, peut induire ou contribuer au développement d'une inflammation dans le système nerveux, déclenchant la SLA, ou aggravant l'état des personnes atteintes de cette maladie. De fait, la Spike peut impacter les récepteurs purinergiques, notamment P2X4 et P2X7. Ce dernier, le récepteur P2X7, est particulièrement sensible car il joue un rôle important dans la neuroinflammation et... dans la douleur. De façon intéressante, l'expression de ce récepteur, P2X7, est accrue suite à une stimulation du TLR4 par le LPS, au niveau des cellules microgliales ou des astrocytes. Ces cellules sont constitutives du système nerveux central, la microglie (ou cellules microgliales) représentant les cellules immunitaires innées résidentes dans le système nerveux. Elles sont en charge d'éliminer les éléments potentiellement toxiques pour le système nerveux... et elles peuvent prendre un phénotype pro-inflammatoires. P2X7 appartient au phénotype pro-inflammatoire de la microglie. Pour mémoire, la Spike interagit avec le LPS, provenant potentiellement d'une perturbation de la barrière intestinale. La Spike interagit aussi avec les fibres Aβ42. Les complexes moléculaires "Spike/LPS" ou "Spike/Aβ42" peuvent activer le TLR4 complètement. Avec la perturbation de la barrière hémato-encéphalique, ces complexes moléculaires "Spike/LPS" ou "Spike/Aβ42" peuvent alors activer le TLR4 et accroître l'expression du P2X7. Le P2X7 est aussi stimulé par l'ATP extracellulaire, libéré lors d'une inflammation. Corrélé à une diminution d'ectonucleotidase, Ado notamment, la surexpression de P2X7 est une bombe explosive. En effet, Ado dégrade l'ATP extracellulaire... si Ado est diminué, alors on aura une accumulation d'ATP extracellulaire qui vont activer d'autant plus P2X7 et entraîner une inflammation importante. Ado est lié au NAD+ ... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887318/ Autre point : le récepteur P2X7 est une clé pour le VIH... et le SARS-COV-2. Oui, encore un point commun entre ces deux virus. Quoiqu'il en soit, cibler P2X7 est une piste intéressante. C'est en cours de recherche... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9877316/ Actuellement, les principaux médicaments approuvés dans différentes régions du monde pour le traitement de la SLA sont le riluzole, l'édaravone et le tauroursodiol/phénylbutyrate de sodium. Malgré les effets positifs de ces médicaments, compte tenu de la gravité de la SLA et de l'absence d'un traitement final efficace pour cette maladie neurodégénérative, davantage de cibles pharmaceutiques doivent être explorées... la modulation purinergique a présenté des résultats très intéressants dans le contrôle de la SLA mais il est aussi possible de rechercher des anti-inflammatoires et anti-apoptotiques, de réduire le stress oxydatif et moduler les activités des canaux ioniques neuronaux. Favoriser le NAD+ est une piste potentielle pour tenter de soulager en immédiat. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512238/ La supplémentation orale en composés précurseurs du NAD+ peut être envisagée  : nicotinamide (NAM), nicotinamide riboside (NR) et nicotinamide mononucléotide (NMN). Ces précurseurs sont utilisés par les voies de biosynthèse du NAD+ et convertis en NAD+ dans la cellule. Mais ce sera à court terme si on ne traite pas les causes profondes de cette déprivation en NAD+. Nota bene : NAD+ lié à SIRT1. Cela peut aider au maintien de la barrière intestinale et de la flore commensale. Bonne journée !

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Long-COVID Scenario and the Therapeutic Potential of the Purinergic System in Neuromodulation Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) involves the degeneration of motor neurons and debilitating and possibly fatal symptoms. The COVID-19 pandemic directly affected the quality of life of this group, and the SARS-CoV-2 infection accelerated the ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ectonucleotidases in Acute and Chronic Inflammation Ectonucleotidases are extracellular enzymes with a pivotal role in inflammation that hydrolyse extracellular purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, e.g., ATP, UTP, ADP, UDP, AMP and NAD+. Ectonucleotidases, expressed by virtually all cell types, immune ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Identification of a novel P2X7 antagonist using structure-based virtual screening P2X4 and P2X7 receptors are ATP-gated ion channels, which play important roles in neuropathic and inflammatory pain, and as such they are important drug targets in diseases of inflammatory origin. While several compounds targeting P2X4 and P2X7 ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Role of NAD+ in Regenerative Medicine The understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of aging has grown exponentially over recent years, and it is now accepted within the scientific community that aging is a malleable process; just as it can be accelerated, it can also be slowed ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Voici la première partie des explications concernant l'article 'impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur l'immunité innée : une revue'. Ci-joint le lien vers l'article. https://www.cureus.com/articles/218170-impact-of-the-sars-cov-2-spike-protein-on-the-innate-immune-system-a-review#!/

Video Transcript AI Summary
**French Summary:** Anaïs Bloqué explique l'impact de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire inné, en se concentrant sur le TLR 4. La Spike seule n'active pas complètement le TLR 4 pour induire une réponse antivirale complète (interférons de type 1). L'association Spike-LPS (lipopolysaccharide bactérien) est nécessaire. L'activation des interférons 1 augmente l'expression d'ACE2, récepteur du virus, via les ISG, sensibilisant l'organisme à l'infection. Les ARN messagers des vaccins peuvent aussi activer les interférons 1 via MDA5. La Spike, protéine amyloïde, peut induire la production de fibres A bêta 42, aggravant l'inflammation. L'augmentation de NF-κB par les ISG peut bloquer p53 (suppresseur de tumeur) et induire le micro-ARN MIR-200c, diminuant l'expression d'ACE2. Chez les personnes avec comorbidités (diabète, obésité), une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire Spike-LPS-TLR4 réduit l'ACE2 disponible, menant à une suractivation de l'angiotensine 2. La Spike persistante pourrait causer des pathologies dégénératives à long terme. **English Translation:** Anaïs Bloqué explains the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the innate immune system, focusing on TLR 4. Spike alone does not fully activate TLR 4 to induce a complete antiviral response (type 1 interferons). The Spike-LPS (bacterial lipopolysaccharide) association is necessary. Activation of interferon 1 increases ACE2 expression, the virus receptor, via ISGs, sensitizing the body to infection. Vaccine mRNAs can also activate interferon 1 via MDA5. Spike, an amyloid protein, can induce the production of A beta 42 fibers, worsening inflammation. Increased NF-κB by ISGs can block p53 (tumor suppressor) and induce microRNA MIR-200c, decreasing ACE2 expression. In people with comorbidities (diabetes, obesity), a Spike-LPS-TLR4 inflammatory amplification loop reduces available ACE2, leading to overactivation of angiotensin 2. Persistent Spike could cause long-term degenerative pathologies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bonjour à tous et à toutes, je suis Anaïs Bloqué, docteur en biologie santé et enseignante d'hématologie immunologie auprès de BTS analyse biomédicale. Avant d'entrer dans le vif du sujet, je précise que je n'ai aucun conflit d'intérêt que ce soit d'ordre professionnel, financier ou privé. Récemment j'ai publié un article traitant des impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV 2 sur le système immunitaire inné et vous êtes nombreux à me demander des explications quant au contenu de ce papier. Vu le nombre de mécanismes et la complexité de ces mécanismes, j'ai décidé de morceler mes explications en 3 grandes parties, il y en aura peut-être une quatrième, ça dépendra du déroulé de mes petites interventions. Je vais commencer par vous raconter la petite histoire du TLR 4 et du et de la Spike du SARS-CoV 2. Il faut savoir que dans notre organisme, nous avons ce que l'on appelle des PRR ou Patogène Recopnishion Resator qui sont capables de détecter la présence d'éléments pathogènes et en détectant donc ces pathogènes, ces PRR s'activent pour lancer une réponse immunitaire afin de contrer bien entendu les éléments infectieux. L'un de ces PRR est le TLR 4 et il est présent donc à la surface des cellules de notre organisme. Alors la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-deux ici représentée en rouge dans un cercle toute seule ne peut enclencher l'activation du TLR 4 dans sa totalité. Il y aura induction de cytokines pro-inflammatoires, mais pas l'induction des interférons de type un. Il faut savoir que les interférons de type un sont fondamentaux dans la réponse immunitaire antivirale. Cela va du déclenchement d'un état antiviral, c'est-à-dire la mise en place de mécanismes qui vont entraver la propagation et la réplication du virus dans l'organisme jusqu'à l'orchestration d'une réponse immunitaire innée et adaptative efficace. Alors le fait que la Spike seule ne puisse enclencher la production des interférons un est plutôt de mauvais augure car seule elle ne permet pas à l'organisme de lutter contre le virus. Pour que la Spike active le TLR 4 dans sa totalité, il faut qu'elle s'associe avec le LPS pour l'hypopolisaccharide, un composant que l'on retrouve sur les bactéries gram négatifs le combo Spike LPS va permettre l'activation du TLR 4 avec l'induction de cytokines pro-inflammatoires et l'induction d'une réponse par les interférons de type 1 le problème c'est qu'après l'initiation d'une réponse par les interférons 1 il y a l'expression de petites molécules que l'on appelle ISG pour interférons stimulated jeans certaines publications scientifiques montrent qu'il existe un lien probable entre ACE2 et les interférons de type un via les ISG dont l'ISG quatre-vingt-quinze les résultats expérimentaux suggèrent que ACE2 se comporte comme un iégé par la stimulation de certains PRRS dont MDA V on en reparlera juste après. Le hic c'est que la réponse aux interférons 1 en augmentant l'expression d'ACE2 va sensibiliser l'organisme aux infections par le SARS-CoV-2 car ACE2 est l'un des récepteurs permettant au virus d'infecter l'organisme via l'interaction Spike ACE2. Je vous vois venir vous allez me dire super donc avec un traitement antibiotique permettant de limiter le LPS il n'y aura pas induction des interférons de type 1 et donc pas d'augmentation de l'expression d'ACE2 et la spyde vaccinale ou la spydep pour de proline ne va pas indreve ne va pas induire seul les interférons 1 et donc une augmentation de ce2 bah non c'est faux car les interférons de type 1 peuvent être lancés comme je l'ai dit par les RLR dont MDA5 et ce récepteur détecte quoi Les ARN 0 et l'ARN messager modifié des produits anti covid comme Pfizer ou Moderna. De plus en dehors de cette induction des interférons 1 par mda 5 de plus il est fort probable que la Spike accompagnée de fibres amyloïdes comme les fibres a bêta quarante-deux déclenche le télaire 4. Cette protéine spike est hautement amyloïde et elle peut entraîner directement la production des fibres a bêta quarante-deux par l'organisme auquel elle peut se lier. En effet l'interaction spike a bêta quarante-deux semble accroître la production de cytokines pro-inflammatoires et n'empêche pas l'interaction entre la sous unité s un de la Spike avec son récepteur c'est-à-dire ACE 2. C'est ce que j'appelle le double effet amyloïde. En effet non seulement la spi qui est amyloïde en elle-même c'est-à-dire que si elle est clivée par des protéases elle va former des fibrilles insolubles et dégénératives, mais en plus elle induit la production de ces fibrilles amyloïdes par l'organisme lui-même comme on peut en trouver dans la maladie d'Alzheimer pouvant contribuer à quoi Ben à l'infection virale. Pour en revenir à notre TALR 4 et aux interférons de type un, les ISG comme l'ISG quatre-vingt-quinze ici figuré présentent une autre particularité cela va augmenter les niveaux de NFK pa b pour vous expliquer simplement NFK pa b est un facteur qui permet la synthèse de cytokines pro-inflammatoires comme le IL6. Il existe une autre activité du NFK ab celle de contrebalancer la p cinquante-trois le gardien de notre génome via le MDM 2 ou murine double minute 2 d'ailleurs on sait que une suractivation de NFK ab est potentiellement cancérigène par blocage de la p cinquante-trois. De plus la protéine spike et plus précisément la sous unité s 2 de la protéine spike peut interagir avec la p cinquante-trois et on ignore encore quelles en sont les conséquences. Cela peut d'ailleurs pencher en faveur d'une activité pro-inflammatoire via NFK ab. Il reste à savoir si la sous-unité s 2 de la protéine spyde dite vaccinale ou s 2 p avec ces 2 modifications proline se lie à la p cinquante-trois. Mais il existe quelques éléments de réponse qui font craindre une réponse par l'affirmative. Il existe une autre conséquence par rapport à l'augmentation de NFK pa b. Ce facteur induit l'expression de micro-éréna, donc ce sont des petites molécules qui vont agir sur le transcryptome cellulaire. Et il y a un micro-éréna qui nous intéresse particulièrement dans ce cadre dans ce cas de figure, c'est le MIR de sens C. Le MIR de sens C va bloquer, va empêcher la surexpression de la CE 2. Cela crée une sorte de balance entre la surex surexpression et la sous expression d'ACE2 cependant les études montrent que dans certains pathopathologiques notamment des pathopathologiques avec des comorbidités comme le diabète ou l'obésité les patients présentaient déjà des taux d'expression du MIR de sens C important autrement dit la quantité initiale d'ACE2 présente dans leur organisme était déjà plus faible que chez les individus sans comorbidité dans ce contexte l'interaction Spike LPS avec le TLR 4 ce qui induit les interférons de type un les I g et l'augmentation du NFK pa b avec l'expression du minière de sens c devient vraiment problématique et dangereux car hyper inflammatoire. En effet chez ces individus le peu d'ACE 2 qu'ils ont va se retrouver bloqué par la Spike par l'interaction Spike ACE 2. On sait que ACE 2 est l'un des récepteurs du virus pour infecter l'organisme via la spike. ACE 2 devient donc indisponible pour la dégradation de l'angiotensine 2 ce qui aboutit à la suractivation de la TAR et à la tempéticoatynique que l'on connaît. De façon intéressante l'angiotensine 2 va également augmenter l'expression du TLR 4 ce qui va relancer dessous dans la machine. En effet on se retrouve devant une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire avec une Spike LPS TLR 4 qui induit les interférons de type 1 qui induit les ISG qui induit d'un côté une surexpression d'ACE2 de l'autre côté une augmentation de du NF kapab avec l'expression du MIR de son C une diminution globale d'ACCE2 avec une augmentation des concentrations d'angiotensine 2 c'est enjotensine 2 augmentant l'expression du TLR 4. Donc ça, c'est une véritable boucle d'amplification. Alors ce n'est pas mortel chez tous les individus, juste ceux présentant des hauts niveaux de MIR de sens C et pourquoi parce que certaines publications relatent une diminution en fait des niveaux de MIR de millet chez des patients ayant recouvrés du SARS-CoV-2 ces chercheurs ont certainement étudié les conséquences de l'infection par le SARS-CoV-2 en dehors de toute co-infection c'est-à-dire sans LPS et en dehors de toute comorbidité mais si il y a de faibles taux du MIR de sang C en général alors plus rien n'arrête la surexpression des CE2. A partir de là l'angiotensine 2 est dégradé et il y a une activation de l'axe AT de R masse R avec la production d'iL 10. Cette iL 10 est quant à elle une cytokine anti-inflammatoire qui va aussi accroître l'expression d'ACE2 et il s'agit là d'une boucle tolrogène. Cela va expliquer pourquoi la protéine spike peut persister des mois dans l'organisme après une infection par le virus ou après les injections à ARN messager modifié en codant cette fameuse protéine car oui cette spyte persiste longtemps et avec ses propriétés amyloïdes on peut craindre des pathologies dégénératives sur le long terme avec un effet cumulatif par exposition répétée à la protéine spike alors le SARS-CoV 2 ne tue pas dans l'immédiat ce qui explique on va dire le faible nombre de décès lors des premières vagues épidémiques mais mais cela va s'inscrire dans le temps. La prochaine fois je vous raconterai l'histoire du TLR 2 puis ensuite l'histoire de l'i l 6 du MIR cent-quarante-huit a et ensuite après je verrai si je le développe sur les propriétés amyloïdes ou pas. Je vous remercie de votre attention et je vous souhaite une excellente journée.
Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein on the Innate Immune System: A Review The Spike protein enables the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by binding to multiple receptors, including the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Scientific studies also indicate that Spike is involved in severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), "long-haul COVID diseases" - also known as "long COVID syndromes" or "post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection" (PACS) - or, recently, in adverse reactions to lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines or other anti-COVID19 products. Numerous mutations, notably within the subunit 1 of Spike (S1), prevent neutralization by antibodies, but more generally, the virus has developed numerous strategies to avoid immune system surveillance, especially type-I interferons (IFN-I). Meanwhile, a “hyperinflammatory” state, named “cytokine storm,” sets in. However, what role does the Spike protein play in the immune escape mechanisms? Can its inflammatory activities affect IFN-I? Does Spike block IFN-I or hijack them for the virus benefits? What are the other potential consequences? This article was written to provide an up-to-date and more general overview of the impact of the Spike protein on the innate immune system and its effectors at the molecular level. cureus.com

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Oh, et bien... perturbations de la barrière hémato-encéphalique dans des cas de covid-long... et une approche d'exploration médicale envisagée. Cet article est intéressant ⤵️ https://bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12883-025-04133-4 "Notre étude suggère que l'IC PASC/covid long est au moins en partie liée à une

Asymmetrical glymphatic dysfunction in patients with long Covid associated neurocognitive impairment- correlation with BBB disruption - BMC Neurology The glymphatic system, a waste clearance pathway, has been implicated in several neurological conditions associated with neuroinflammation. COVID-19 associated neurocognitive impairment, part of the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), is strongly associated with neuroinflammation and disrupted blood-brain barrier (BBB). Several studies have implicated a synergistic interaction between the glymphatic system dysfunction and BBB disruption. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the role of the MRI metric diffusion along the perivascular spaces DTI (DTI-ALPS) in patients with PASC and correlated this with the BBB capillary permeability metric- K trans derived from Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) perfusion. 14 subjects with PASC who had persisting symptoms of anosmia, ageusia, fatigue, and cognitive impairment (CI) and ten healthy age and sex matched controls were recruited. All PASC subjects underwent routine and advanced MR brain imaging at two time points, (3 months +/- 2 weeks) after initial infection - referred as Time Point 1 (TP-1) - and 10 repeated the MRI scan 12 months (+/- 2 weeks) later - referred as Time Point 2 (TP-2), while the controls had MR imaging done only at TP-1. All had mild neurocognitive impairment. In the final analysis we included those who had DTI study at both time points (n-10). MR imaging included DCE perfusion and DTI in addition to anatomical imaging. Given the small size of the sample and nonnormality of data in the descriptive analyses, nonparametric analyses were used for group comparisons. A two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to show the differences in DTI-ALPS between the patients and controls in the predefined regions of interest. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) was used to assess the correlation between DTI-ALPS index with K trans. There was significant reduction in the DTI-ALPS index between the patients and controls in the left hemisphere (z = 2.04, p < 0.04). However, there was no significant change over time in the index. There was a strong inverse correlation between the central white matter K trans and DTI-ALPS index (rho = 0.66, p < 0.03). Our study indicates that disordered para vascular drainage, a marker for glymphatic system and BBB damage may contribute to neurocognitive impairment (NCI) among patients with PASC. The DTI-ALPS index, which does not require contrast injection, has the potential to serve as a non-invasive biomarker. bmcneurol.biomedcentral.com

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Non seulement il stipule qu'il y a surexpression du TLR2/ TLR4 mais il ajoute qu'il y a une augmentation de l'expression du P2X7... c'est une bombe à retardement. Il y a une reprogrammation du SI, sur le long-terme, particulièrement au niveau des macrophages. 24/n

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Bien, résumé de la partie 1 : SIRT1 inhibe p53 pour éviter l'apoptose cellulaire. Et p53 inhibe SIRT1 via miR-34a pour exercer son activité, créant une boucle d'amplification apoptotique. Bizarrement, on retrouve une stimulation de p53 après les injections anti-covid dans les

@RHandiSolidaire - Reconquête Handi-Solidaire 🌿🇫🇷

https://www.laselectiondujour.com/charcot-maladie-enferme-vivant Du nom de celui qui l’a découverte en 1869, la Maladie de Charcot est une Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique touchant 500.000 personnes à travers le monde, dont 8.000 en France. C’est une maladie neurologique dégénérative sans espoir de guérison et une

Charcot, la maladie qui enferme vivant Surnommée « la maladie la plus cruelle du monde », la sclérose latérale amyotrophique (SLA) touche près de 8 000 personnes en France. Derrière cette maladie rare et toujours incurable : patients, proches et chercheurs, se mobilisent pour alerter, sensibiliser, et surtout, faire avancer une recherche encore trop négligée. Car demain, la SLA pourrait frapper bien plus de vies qu'on ne l'imagine. laselectiondujour.com

@Thefish751855 - Thefish

@MeasslainteIRL I've been working on this today (FYI @AnneliseBocquet), but related to the SIRT-1 pathway. All these are related. In short, elevated miR-34a is linked to neurotoxicity, and dysregulated miRNAs are the hallmark of ALS, but it's complicated. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8921154/

Insights into the identification of a molecular signature for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis exploiting integrated microRNA profiling of iPSC-derived motor neurons and exosomes Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of motor neurons (MNs). Most cases are sporadic, whereas 10% are familial. The pathological mechanisms underlying the disease are ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Thefish751855 - Thefish

@MeasslainteIRL @AnneliseBocquet Linking our studies: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24780820/ The Influence of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Expansion in Neuroinflammation and Neurodegenerative Diseases https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38607083/

miR-34a expands myeloid-derived suppressor cells via apoptosis inhibition - PubMed Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population and show significant expansion under pathological conditions. microRNA plays important roles in many biological processes, whether microRNAs have a function in the expansion of MDSCs is still not very clear. In this study, miR-3 … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Influence of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cell Expansion in Neuroinflammation and Neurodegenerative Diseases - PubMed The neuro-immune axis has a crucial function both during physiological and pathological conditions. Among the immune cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) exert a pivotal role in regulating the immune response in many pathological conditions, influencing neuroinflammation and neurodegenera … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28652929/ "TNF-α binding to TNF-R1 can activate the transcription factor NFκB. Our laboratory has recently observed an NFκB binding site on the promotor region of microRNA-34a (miR-34a). " Linked directly to the SARS-COV-2 and anti-covid injections... https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35588734/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10145134/

TNF-α and Beyond: Rapid Mitochondrial Dysfunction Mediates TNF-α-Induced Neurotoxicity - PubMed This short communication describes our research which demonstrates that TNF-α causes a rapid decline in mitochondrial function, leading to neuronal cell death. As such, this neurotoxic proinflammatory cytokine may play a role in brain damage from stroke and neurodegeneration in chronic conditions su … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells dominate the SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response in COVID-19 outpatients and are associated with durable antibodies - PubMed Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-specific CD4+ T cells are likely important in immunity against coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), but our understanding of CD4+ longitudinal dynamics following infection and of specific features that correlate with the main … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: The Molecular Basis of Some Adverse Events Each injection of any known vaccine results in a strong expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This is the result of the innate immune system activation, without which no adaptive response to the injection of vaccines is possible. Unfortunately, ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

@Thefish751855 @MeasslainteIRL This is really interesting @Thefish751855!!! MDSCs are bound to IL-10, which increases ACE2 expression. If miR-34a is also bound to MDSCs, we have a direct connection to RAGE!

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Oui... une fois n'est pas coutume... https://actaneurocomms.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40478-023-01647-1 Augmentation de l'expression d'ACE2 dans la maladie d’Alzheimer. Je répète : Augmentation de l'expression d'ACE2 dans la maladie d’Alzheimer. Me rappelle d'un grand scientifique qui m'a dit que je me trompais. 😐

Higher angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) levels in the brain of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease - Acta Neuropathologica Communications Cognitive decline due to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is frequent in the geriatric population, which has been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, we investigated the levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a regulator of the renin-angiotensin system and the main entry receptor of SARS-CoV-2 in host cells, in postmortem parietal cortex samples from two independent AD cohorts, totalling 142 persons. Higher concentrations of ACE2 protein (p < 0.01) and mRNA (p < 0.01) were found in individuals with a neuropathological diagnosis of AD compared to age-matched healthy control subjects. Brain levels of soluble ACE2 were inversely associated with cognitive scores (p = 0.02) and markers of pericytes (PDGFRβ, p = 0.02 and ANPEP, p = 0.007), but positively correlated with concentrations of soluble amyloid-β peptides (Aβ) (p = 0.01) and insoluble phospho-tau (S396/404, p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in ACE2 were observed in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of tau and Aβ neuropathology. Results from immunofluorescence and Western blots showed that ACE2 protein is predominantly localized in microvessels in the mouse brain whereas it is more frequently found in neurons in the human brain. The present data suggest that higher levels of soluble ACE2 in the human brain may contribute to AD, but their role in CNS infection by SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. actaneurocomms.biomedcentral.com

@AnneliseBocquet - Bocquet Annelise 🔬🧬📚🚜

Oh... les astrocytes sont des targets du SARS-CoV-2... waouh, quelle surprise (en fait, non, pas du tout). https://t.co/ZcXucnbHz1 https://t.co/2w5BwmkG5S Les astrocytes, c'est quoi ? Ce sont des cellules gliales constituant notre cerveau... Le cerveau n'est pas constitué que https://t.co/sghCnOHJ9r

@P_McCulloughMD - Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accelerates Alzheimer’s Disease Via Increased ACE2-Mediated Cerebrovascular Inflammation Pandemic Could Lead to Expanded Dementia Population Needing Care These data are worrisome given the ubiquity of Spike protein we assume is retained after SARS-CoV-2

@MeasslainteIRL - Thomas Anthony III

@AnneliseBocquet @Thefish751855 @53v3n0fn1n3 @Fynnderella1 @kacdnp91 @CanningPharm @CheweyLife @dr_morrissey @CShoemakerMD @Kevin_McKernan @KevinMcCairnPhD @LyellJ @MicieliA_MD @dredwild @bertvargas @BertVargas @djnicholl @dr_nickward @caseyalbin @AmmarAlChalabi

@janiesaysyay - Janiesaysyay

@MeasslainteIRL @AnneliseBocquet @Thefish751855 @53v3n0fn1n3 @Fynnderella1 @kacdnp91 @CanningPharm @CheweyLife @dr_morrissey @CShoemakerMD @Kevin_McKernan @KevinMcCairnPhD @LyellJ @MicieliA_MD @dredwild @BertVargas @djnicholl @dr_nickward @caseyalbin @AmmarAlChalabi https://t.co/mtHA79OUWW

@HerbsandDirt - Carole Mac

Another ALS diagnosis for someone who admitted getting the Covid 💉, and also pushed people to get it. How many people is this now? Other than Alzheimer’s Disease, I can’t think of a worse ailment to live with. Heartbreaking. .@unhealthytruth https://t.co/Bmphdlkb47

@CheweyLife - Angela Rhoten

@janiesaysyay @MeasslainteIRL @AnneliseBocquet @Thefish751855 @53v3n0fn1n3 @Fynnderella1 @kacdnp91 @CanningPharm @dr_morrissey @CShoemakerMD @Kevin_McKernan @KevinMcCairnPhD @LyellJ @MicieliA_MD @dredwild @BertVargas @djnicholl @dr_nickward @caseyalbin @AmmarAlChalabi 😞 Read replies.👀👇🏽 https://t.co/huKzS83jx2

@CheweyLife - Angela Rhoten

More in replies. 👀👇🏽

@dbdugger - Daniel Brittain Dugger

As with ME/CFS, efforts to Solve ALS continue to this day, that's why you don't allow individuals to experience Vpu-like mediated neurological damage which includes the cleavage of TDP-43. Weirdos. Losers. LMAO! https://t.co/vEKwM8Ilhl

Saved - January 12, 2026 at 1:19 AM

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

🔥🔥HIDE THE BALL🔥🔥 The intentional deception behind the DNA contamination story. @DrJBhattacharya @MartyMakary @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @SenRonJohnson @JesslovesMJK @DJSpeicher @weldeiry @KUPERWASSERLAB @RetsefL @joshg99 @KMilhoanMDPhD https://t.co/KFOj7YNckg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 lays out a detailed critique of how the transition from process one to process two allegedly occurred, arguing that process one was deliberately structured to “cook the books” so that regulators would see nothing in their assays, while the real material of concern—DNA contaminants, including plasmids and RNA/DNA hybrids—would only be detectable in process two. Key points - The shift from process one to process two is alleged to be planned from the start. The assays used were designed “not to find things,” and the trial was set up in process one with the expectation that process two would ultimately be used, exposing a premeditated sequence of actions. - Ten nanogram limit and copy number. The ten nanogram figure is framed as a limited hangout: the real concern is molarity and copy number of DNA molecules, not weight. Naked-DNA half-lives are short, but lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) protect DNA, altering degradation and persistence. The origin of the 10 ng limit traces to Sheng Fowler and Keith Patten’s work, which emphasized copy number (molarity) rather than weight, particularly for small fragments and plasmids. The argument is that 10 ng can correspond to vastly different copy numbers depending on fragment size; smaller fragments dramatically increase copy number and potential integration ends. - Spike vs. CAN gene targeting. In process one, spike sequences are amplified, then RNA is generated via IVT, and residual DNA is monitored using a CAN gene target. The CAN assay is described as a decoy that would not detect post-amplification products; spike post-amplification would be abundant, but the CAN assay would show little or nothing. In process two, E. coli replication of the entire plasmid would introduce CAN sequences, yet regulators were still steered to look at CAN rather than spike, masking true residual DNA. - Assay design and regulatory deception. The EMA/EMAs documents and related papers show an RT-PCR setup that amplifies spike RNA to confirm expression while also using CAN primers that would not detect post-amplification plasmid content. A key accusation is that the regulators were given an assay that cannot detect the relevant post-amplification material, while an assay for spike exists but is not reported or used. - DNA vs. RNA measurement challenges. qPCR is argued to be ill-suited for this purpose due to fragmentation and the mismatch between input weight and actual molecule count. Fragmentation from DNase treatment is nonrandom: can (CAN) regions are hyper-fragmented, spike regions less so, causing disproportionate detectability depending on primer design and amplicon length. This yields underestimation of the true DNA content when relying on CAN-targeted PCR. - Enzymatic treatment and measurement implications. DNase I degrades CAN more efficiently than spike, particularly when DNA is in a DNA/RNA hybrid context post-IVT. Another enzyme (DNase XT) is claimed to better digest RNA-DNA hybrids, moving CT values for CAN and leaving spike detectable. This suggests the choice of enzymes was deliberate to obscure true residual DNA, while spike DNA remains more detectable under alternative assays. - Measurement methods and data interpretation. Fluorometry (e.g., PicoGreen or Ribogreen) is used to measure DNA or RNA doses, but crosstalk and fragmentation complicate interpretation. The speaker argues that fluorometry should be used in conjunction with RNase/DNase treatments and proper controls to distinguish DNA from RNA, and cautions that PCR-based extrapolations can massively overestimate or misrepresent actual DNA content due to fragmentation biases. - Consolidated claim. Across multiple studies and preparations, spike DNA is found at significantly higher levels than CAN DNA (e.g., a hundredfold difference in several datasets). The “can” assay is positioned as a decoy, while spike assays reveal the genuine DNA content and potential for integration, signaling intentional misdirection in regulator briefings. The speaker concludes that the “game of hide the ball” is ongoing: regulators have been misdirected to look for CAN DNA in process one, while the meaningful residual DNA relates to spike-containing sequences post-amplification—yet this is not consistently measured or reported. The overall thrust is that the design of assays and the choice of targets imply intentional deception to obscure true DNA contamination risks, particularly in the transition to process two.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, everyone. It's January 11, and, I've just realized, online that some folks are, not fully understanding what's going on in process one and process two and how the DNA contamination story folds into this. And so I wanted to spend a little bit more time here, really highlighting those differences because when you see what went on, in that shift, you'll understand the deception that's going on, and you'll also come to recognize that this was a premeditated move. You can tell what their intentions are by what assays they built, and you can see by what they did that their plan from the start was to always use process two. Okay? It was not a, oh, no. We can't scale up. We have to rip the PCR and and and bead cleanup out of this process to scale, and we're just gonna switch to process two now after the trial is complete. The assays they had in place during process one only made sense if process two was ultimately to be, considered and used, which means they set the trial up in process one intentionally that way when they knew they would be on process two in the end. Alright? So and you can this is evident by the assays that they designed and they gave to the regulators. And in both cases for process one and process two, the assays that they designed were designed not to find things. Alright? So I just wanna I I wanna make that a little bit more clear because my presentations in the past doesn't seem like that that really that really came out. Now before we get into this, there is another detail that I feel I've missed in in speaking about this in the past. I've just gone over it too quickly, too many slides, that kind of thing. So I'm gonna zero in on a few issues about the 10 nanogram limit that people don't fully appreciate, and then we're gonna talk about the different assays that they have for monitoring the DNA and the RNA in process one and process two and how those can only make sense if they had planned to do process two from the start, which makes you question why did they run process one the way they did. They did that to cook the books knowing they'd have ultimately been processed too. And you you you'll see this. It'll become very clear to you that they from the get go, their plan was to use processed too. They just came up with a trial that would bend this, and, the evidence is in what they target in PCR. So, okay, let's let's hit on the ten nanogram limit a little bit. Okay. This is a limited hangout. Okay? Ten minute half life of of DNA, is what what happens when it's naked. We all know this. Right? The and so they come up with these limits based on naked DNA injection. We get into the world of LNPs, and everything goes out the window because LNPs protect the DNA from the degradation process, so we don't know the half life of the DNA now. And we're we're learning this real time in patients as we find patients that are expressing spike fifteen hundred days later. Okay? This is a bit shocking that the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of this drug were just a a crapshoot, and we're, living with this experiment now real time on patients, unfortunately. Now you have to understand how did they come to this ten nanogram limit. Okay? Like, what is the origin of it in order for you to understand its its context? So it comes back to this Sheng Fowler and Keith Petten paper where they were taking genomic DNA and putting it on cell lines or mice to try to see what the negative effects would be. Okay? And what most people haven't captured out of this paper is that the authors rightly point out that the weight is not the nanogram weight is not the issue. In fact, back when this paper was published, they were talking about picograms, and they've since loosened those regulations since they got liability protection. But, so it used to be 10 or a 100 picograms, and now it's 10 nanograms. But what what people have missed in this guidance is that weight isn't the right metric for a contamination like this. It's molecules. Weight doesn't give you the number of molecules unless you know the length of the DNA. So for instance, human DNA at 10 nanograms is about 1,450 copies of of DNA. That means, you know, the chromosomes are usually, you know, a hundred, two hundred million mega megabases in size, and so they only have ends on the telomeres. The reason people care about copy number is that when you get down to 10 nanograms of 200 bases of DNA, you're dealing with 50,000,000,000 copies, not 1,400. Okay? And it is the it is the actual copy number that matters most because the copy number dictates how many ends of the DNA that you have. The ends of the DNA are what can be joined in integration. The ends of the DNA have phosphates and hydroxyls, which are the active groups that can be integrated and that ligases use to put DNA into into integration events. So you'll note in Keith's work that they point out here that, well, if this were a very small piece of DNA, like a retroviral DNA, which would be like the size of a plasmid, the the DNA limit would need to be 10 femtograms or lower. And if there are a 100 copies of the infectious viral genome, the amount of DNA would need to be a 100 adagrams. Okay? What this statement is talking about is the molarity of DNA, and that's what matters, the copy number, not the weight. Alright? Now you may not be familiar with adagrams and femtograms, but this is what helps you convert those numbers. Okay? So nanograms and femtograms, there's about a it's about a 100,000,000 fold. If you get down to a 100 adagrams, as he was suggesting, it's eight logs lower than 10 nanograms. Alright? This is why this 10 nanogram thing is a mirage. It's a limited hangout because everyone's talking about weight when the real number that Keith Petten was speaking about in his guidance for this was about copy number, not about weight. And since then, people have always assumed that, well, all the cell substrate DNA that might contaminate a vaccine is whole genomes. It's it's should be 3,000,000,000 bases long, and it's gonna mean that 10 nanograms equals 1,400 copies. No big deal. But when you get down to things that are 5,000 letters long, not not 6,000,000,000 letters long, that copy number suddenly goes through the roof. And so this is why he has a molarity based recommendation in the paper that gets just ignored by everybody. Alright? So when you get into the adagram range, and you're using lipid nanoparticles, which make that DNA a hundredfold more potent, you can see that we're just we're we're we're well over any rational limit that relates to the paper that originated that 10 nanogram limit, and that 10 nanogram limit never never really considered the the LNPs making this last longer and be more potent. Okay? So that's the context you need to view the DNA contamination story with because if you're viewing it in this context, we have a DNA contaminant here that isn't substrate genomic DNA. Okay? It is this is actually plasmids that are like viruses. They're very small self replicating molecules, and so you have to view them through the adagram guidance that Keith Patton put into his paper. No one's doing that. So this be this means it's really important for us to look at how are they measuring this DNA, And if the methods that they have for measuring this DNA, are they ever gonna find it? And that is where you can see the deception that's occurred. Okay. I've I've got papers here that show that, you know, Limm et al describes high integration rates. You can see down there, it's like 10 to 20% of the cells are getting integrated when you when you put in transfection reagents. And this goes through the some of the math about the molarity and how it is those ends of DNA that matter. And anyone who's done a DNA ligation reaction knows this. You can see it in Mani Anders' manuscripts and his guidance on this where the ligation that you perform never asks you about the nanograms as input. They talk about the number of ends that you have, phosphates and hydroxyls in the molecules. So what is the molarity of the DNA? That dictates how many adapters you try to ligate. They don't go with nanograms because nanograms are a meaningless number if you don't know the size of the DNA. And so the ligation conditions completely change if you're trying to ligate adapters to 10 kilobytes pieces of DNA versus a 100 base pair pieces of DNA because a molarity is off by thousandfold or or and and that's or a hundredfold, whatever it is. But it's it's similarity that matters. Okay. So, Bancel knows this. I think you've seen this. Of course, this stuff can integrate. So everyone knows how we got here. BMJ talks about process one to process two and and Josh's work, okay, and how there was no trial really done. Well, the a trial was done, but they never released the data because I think the trial data showed that this was actually extraordinarily dangerous. So they hid that data knowing that the train had left the station. Okay. So so to to understand the deception that's going on, you have to understand what DNA was in process one versus what DNA was in process two, and then you can see how they played this game of hide the ball. This is the plasmids that that that they disclosed on the right. This is the plasma we found on the left, and everyone knows they had they admitted this s v 40 thing. But I think I wanna draw a lot of attention to right now is this can gene. This is what the can gene on the left there was disclosed by the TGA as being what they target to monitor the DNA. And the reason why that's important is that when they were operating in process one, that target wasn't there. Process one, if you recall, amplified spike, which is from noon to 06:00 on the right side of this plasmid, they amplified that as a spike sequence. So when you amplify, that becomes, like, a thousand to a million times higher in copy number than the CAN gene. Alright? So post amplified PCR, they then go and look for residual DNA of the nonamplified part of the plasmid. Right? So this is what's happening. You have a you have an input of a very small amount of this template plasmid. You run it through PCR, and you get millions of copies of spike. And then where does Pfizer tell them to go look for the contaminating DNA? Over in Cannes. What are they gonna find? They're gonna find nothing. This is what they should be measuring. They should be measuring spike. So why does a TGA, when they're FOIA ed and asked, what are you using to monitor the residual DNA, why do we get documents back from them that say this? Can gene. They've been given a target that doesn't exist. Alright? Now this target makes sense if you're gonna run that plasmid through E. Coli because in that case, the CAN gene needs to exist in order for E. Coli to copy it. It's the resistance gene, and it should be there at equal copy number. We have a paper coming out that's gonna show you why it's not really at equal copy number. It's actually at 1% of the spike for some reasons I'll get into in just a minute. But this shows you that, a, in process one during the clinical trial, they gave them a decoy target to monitor the residual DNA. They didn't look at spike, which is the thing that they amplified that as the input to the IVT reaction. They told them to look at the precursor to this process, which would find nothing or very low amounts. Okay. So that's that's one thing. Two, this shows you that they probably from the start were intending to go through process two by measuring the can gene because that should be there. That's the one gene that if the E. Coli were to grow the plasmid, the only thing that you could that you could really anchor onto or that you shouldn't anchor onto is a resistance gene because that's what drives the selection for the plasmid to make sure that it's there. So that should be there in theory after E. Coli growth. E. Coli can't maintain these plasmids without that gene. In fact, when the FDA tells you that these residual plasmids are immaterial to plasmid manufacturing, they're lying through their teeth because you can't actually get a plasmid to grow in a coli without that antibiotic resistance gene. It's actually the most critical part of plasmid manufacturing when they tell you it's not material to it. It's a a complete inversion of the truth. But the fact that they told them to look here is very peculiar given if you look through the EMA documents, they have an assay to look at spike, but they never report it. Alright. So, I'll touch on that in just a bit. In process two, what happens is E. Coli doesn't just replicate spike. It has to replicate the entire circle, which means it should be the same copy number as spike, can. There's a second artifact as to why that's not true in the case of these vials is that they're using an enzyme to destroy this DNA afterwards that destroys can but doesn't destroy spike. And so there's a hundredfold offset between CAN and spike when we look at this through PCR, and we'll go through that data. Okay. So this is very telling as to what's going on in the minds of the people who designed the trial and in the minds of what they're telling the regulators to look for. They're telling them to go look in the wrong place, particularly in light of this. This is the EMA documents that that show they have a qPCR test that looks at spike. The these sequences that you see up here, if you put them in the SnapGene, you'll see they land on spike. And this sequence is used to confirm that the plasmid actually has a spike insert and to confirm that the RNA is of spike origin after the IVT reaction. You'll see this is an RT PCR reaction. That means they're looking at RNA. But those same primers, you merely need to put into PCR and not run the the ten minute RT step in front of it, and you get answers for only DNA. They're using this to get answers for both DNA and RNA in this case. So you have to ask, why did they go and make a CAN assay when they already were forced to validate a spike assay? And why don't they report the CT value for that spike assay? They don't report it because it's a hundredfold higher, and we know that now. Alright. So this is the this is the game of hide the ball that they play with the regulators. They gave them an assay that can't find anything even though they had already validated an assay that would find it. So Pfizer knows they're over the limit because this assay would have told them so. And then they went and made an assay for for process one that would find nothing. And you have to ask yourself, how did the regulator fall for this? How did they how were they given an assay to look at the preamplified template that didn't find the postamplified product? They should have had a spike assay looking at postamplification, and yet one exists in their documents that doesn't get used. Alright? This begins to show you the thinking that's going on in in the people that designed the trial and how they hid this from the regulators. And the regulators still to this day are clueless of this deception because they keep saying, well, the regulators looked and they use this can assay, and they don't see anything. And no matter how many times we yell at them that you can't use a can assay during process one, what are you talking about? That's not what they amplify. It falls on deaf ears. Okay. I'm gonna go through a few other details here that befuddle qPCR. Alright? QPCR is really not meant for task on this, and you'll understand why as I go through this. But they should have known it's not suited for purpose because Moderna told them it wasn't suited for purpose. That was in their patents that this does not work. And there's several reasons why it doesn't work that we'll hit on. Okay. So just a refresher because I think some people aren't familiar with the difference between process one and process two. During process one, they would take this plasmid as an input, PCR amplify this DNA of spike, and then they would take that DNA. Now that the left side of this molecule has been drowned out with amplification of the right side of the molecule, they would then take that, put that through an IVT reaction to get RNA and to get rid of the DNA. They, in process two, had to switch and change to using a DNase. Prior to this, when they amplified the DNA, they put a biotin on here, they could pull the DNA out with a magnetic bead. And that's a more expensive process, So that slowed them down. But, and and and that's that's the reason for them wanting to go directly off the plasmids is they didn't wanna have to do the PCR step and the cleanup step. So they switched to using these plasmids where they can just use an enzyme in attempt to clean this up. This enzyme will clean up and erase the left hand of this molecule. What we have found is that it does not erase spike because spike still has the RNA stuck to it, and that enzyme does not resolve RNA DNA hybrids. So in both cases, process one and in process two, the CAN target is not gonna find the content. Alright? So when you do this DNase reaction, you actually create a shotgun library, and this shotgun library is a fragmented library that looks you hope it's randomly fragmented. The problem you're gonna find that we're gonna go through is that it does not randomly fragment. It actually hyper fragments the can region and under fragments the spike region by about a hundredfold. And the reason PCR fails to sort this out is that your detection frequency is entirely dependent on how far apart your primers are. If you fragment this down to a 150 bases and design a 233 base pair product to measure this, you're not gonna find much because anytime there's a molecule that's broken between the primers, it can't amplify. So when you see papers like the OX paper using really large where where they emit in their paper that the average fragment size is a 100 bases or a 150 bases, and then they go and design a 233 base pair amplicon to measure it, they are intentionally trying to deceive you because this cannot amplify the majority of the material that's in there because most of it's broken to be shorter than the distance of the primers. They also have a 63 base pair primer set for a can. And, of course, that amplifies more because if its average size is a 150 bases, there will be more molecules that are amplifiable. Now one of the deceptions that occurs here is that when you amplify with DNA, you're only getting a quant of this part of the plasmid. This is only one one hundredth of the plasmid, maybe one hundred and twentieth of the plasmid. So then you apply some mathematical extrapolations, some some models to say, hey. I I measured, you know, 10% or 1% of the actual plasmid. I'm gonna multiply everything by a 100. And and that assumes that every time you see one of these molecules that isn't fragmented between the primers, that there must have at one point been a full length plasmid from that. Therefore, I can safely multiply by a 120 to measure how much was there. What this fails to capture is that anything that is fragmented between the primers doesn't get measured, and you then miss out on not just that 63 base per region, but the other 7,000 you would have added to it. So it's a multiplicative error when you when you make this mistake. The other thing that it that it rests on is that the the plasmid is evenly digested everywhere in the plasmid, and that's we know to be false. The can regions get hyperfragmented, and the spike regions don't. So there's two mathematical extrapolations that this thing relies on that are both false and multiplicatively false, and that they're they're not just wrong a little. The error they make, you have to multiply by a 120 in the case of the 63 base pair amplicon because that's one one hundred and twentieth of the entire plasmid length. And to the extent that the plasmid is not uniformly digested, you're gonna make additional errors upon that. And we know that there's about a two log scale difference between what gets fragmented in spike versus can. So you've got 200 fold errors going on in this mathematical extracts extrapolation, so you could easily have a 10,000 fold mistake when you use PCR. Another way to look at this is to take a DNA library that's been sheared, and this is not a vaccine. It's just a sheared library. You can pull off the Internet, and what it looks like on an Agilent electropherogram. And to conceptualize this, the 233 base per ampicon is only gonna be able to capture the material in the red brackets, and the sixty three one will get the rest. However, nothing that you do with PCR is gonna get it all. It's always gonna under measure it, which is why you'll see in the speaker paper, many of the lots are under the 10 nanogram limit. That's expected because this thing we know is an under counting tool. Now the other thing it doesn't measure is unexpected DNA. For for PCR to work, you have to design primers to amplify your target, so you're only amplifying what you expect to be there. So if you give someone the canned region, which you don't expect to be there, you'll find nothing. And likewise, the E. Coli background DNA will never get counted in this measurement. This is why we have moved to fluorometry because it measures everything. Now when you get a look at the read lengths from OXR nanopore, you can see that, this is heavily shifted to the left, which means a lot of the material is in fact small, but it has a long tail. And, this complicates making any of these extrapolations. Another way to look at this, there's 200 base pair limit right there. So if you design, 200 base pair amplicons, you're only gonna measure the DNA that's the right. And some may say, hey. That's fine. That's what the reg say. 200 bases is safe because, it's not functional. But we get we we have 72 base pair pieces of DNA in this plasmid known as the SV 40 promoter enhancer that are functional. They're nucleotargeting sequences, and they're down here. And we know small DNA can integrate. So when it comes to using LNPs, the 200 base per limit is really, rational. That was designed because DNA usually gets chewed from the ends in. So when you inject it naked, it's the 200 base per stuff should get chewed faster. That's not true when you LNP wrap it. 200 bases can still stimulate seagusting and can still integrate. So the 200 base per limit really doesn't make any sense once you start using LNPs. You get need to measure everything. Okay. So let's touch on why DNase one does not uniformly digest the plasmid. Alright? This is actually something that's been known in literature since 1997 from Sutton et al, and it's been recapitulated in the literature from BioNTech themselves. You'll notice that there are lots of papers now, five peer reviewed papers that see this phenomenon, and I don't think everyone's caught on to why. So this the most recent paper we have coming out will explain why. Okay. What you'll notice when we amplify the vector versus spike in our first paper, we had, a five CT offset between those two. Okay? Vector is red. Spike is blue. Why are those not on top of each other? That's because we believe and we didn't fully appreciate it at this time, but that the vector is getting degraded by DNase one more than spike is. That offset is then recapitulated in speaker. Speaker paper has this offset, which is more like five to seven CT offset. You'll see the spike is in red for lending the Moderna lots and the vectors in blue. That is a hundredfold difference. Pay attention to that number because that number is what we consistently see study to study. You look at Sonya Pakova's work. She has an offset between vector and spike in both of these. Sometimes it's erratic. Sometimes it flips. Don't totally understand why that's going on. It's a sign that there's some manufacturing slop, which was observed in the trials. So, this is perhaps congruent with what the EMA saw. Buchholt's work. He also has about a 10 scale, a tenfold difference between these. These are the spikes over here. The three bar graphs on the right are the are the spike sequences, and the other parts of the of this plasmid vector are on the left. Now for these purposes, I I spoke to Philip directly, and he said, hey. Take out this one assay here because I think there's an artifact there. That that one is screaming hot, and it was running a different plate, maybe it had different different standards. So just pull the outlier off and be conservative. If that were present, this would be a hundredfold different. K? Alright. Then you go and look at, our work from, that has recently published as a preprint, and it's on its way to publish shortly. Here, this is the most thorough work done to date and that we did 27 PCRs for every vial. We did three different dilutions, all in triplicate. So each one of these bars has three different PCR reactions at one x, one to 10 x dilution, one to a 100 x dilution. That series of dilutions is important whenever there's inhibitors potentially involved in the PCR because sometimes the one x will give you an erratic result when there's inhibitor that you don't see at 10 x and and a 100 x dilution. So you run all three. We also did this at three different targets in the in the plasmid. So we can see that all the regions in spike are coming out of a CT of 15, and the regions in the plasmid vector are coming out of 22. That's a seven point one four delta CT. That means that's a 141 fold difference between the spike and the, the backbone. That is not an artifact. That is real biological signal that there is a hundredfold more spike DNA than canned DNA. So once again, the canned target that pharma is giving the regulators is meant to hide the ball. It's designed to. Alright? These are process two lots. This is not just a process one issue. Over here are are Pfizer lots. They have s v 40. So, in this case, there's no Moderna lots here. And you can see one of these artifacts occurring. Like, in the one case, we get a CT of, like, six. That's that's that's not real because we don't see one to ten and one to a 100 doing it. Whenever you get CTs that are below a CT of 10, the the qPCR instrument is using that window from zero to 10 to background subtract. And if you have signal come up there, it'll get confused. So this is why it's important to do the titrations. You really wanna see each one of these bar graphs in the one x to the one to 10 to the one to a 100. They should be about 3.3 CTs apart. And then when you see that that consistently, you you know the assay is not inhibited. This is the right way to do a inhibitor reaction. You can't do an inhibitor reaction by putting DNA in here at CT of five or 10 because it's too hot for you to find an inhibitor. You have to do a serial dilution. The OX group failed to do this. You have to do a serial dilution to pick up inhibitors, and you wanna measure that there's a 3.3 CT offset between all of these to gauge whether inhibitors there or not. Alright. So what we did in this study is we said forget the one x. There's too many artifacts in the one x data like this one here. So what we're gonna do is go with the one to 10 dilution as the measurement for this and then multiply all our numbers by 10 when we're done, and that will give us it'll put us in the sweet spot of the dynamic range for the PCR machine. So, again, the take home message here is there there's a large offset here, and that is biologically real. And Moderna knew this. They even wrote a patent saying don't use qPCR because of this fragmentation problem, and it doesn't measure everything that's there. So what's the mechanism behind this? We spoke about RNA DNA hybrids, and we have a paper on this now that's coming out. RNA DNA hybrids is after in a in a in a vitro transcription reaction, when you make RNA off that DNA, that RNA is self complementary to the DNA. So it's wrapped up in a knot with the DNA. And when the DNAs comes to chew this, it's like, I don't recognize that molecule. It's half RNA, half DNA. I'm not touching it. I'm gonna go destroy the DNA that's double stranded. That's my substrate. This isn't. So the DNase one does a great job destroying the CAN gene, you don't find anything, which is why they're pointing the regulators there while all the spike DNA is a hundredfold higher according to five different studies that have looked at this that are all peer reviewed and published now. Okay? This is another way to depict the problem. The the backbone gets degraded. You PCR can. You PCR spike. This is exactly what we see. You get about a hundredfold difference. Okay. Here's another way to look at this. What we did is we took the vaccines, and then we treated them with Triton x and some in this case, the PCR. The PCR does the heating for us, but we just treat it with soap, and that opens up the LMPs. And once you open up the LMPs, you can then ask, okay. What does DNase one do to that material? Can we get the CTs to move it off? We reapply DNase one. And what happens when you reapply DNase one is you see spike stay the same, yet you see the Ori region, the vector splits. So more DNase one continues to erase their CAN region. It's not fully erased either. It's not zero, but it's below the limit. And it moves more when you add DNase one back in again, but it doesn't touch spike. If you go and grab the next enzyme down in the NAB catalog that's designed for IVT reactions, for RNA DNA hybrid digestion, you'll see spike move six CT. Even blows apart the Ori region even further. Same thing is true in in Pfizer and Moderna. You can see the Ori moves with more DNase one. You add, the spike does not move, so it's protected. Put in DNase XT and bang, 12 CTs move, when you add in the proper enzyme. So they're using the wrong enzyme. And, this is not an accidental thing, I would say, because these enzymes are sold by the same manufacturers, and there are many manufacturers that offer enzymes that are designed for iBT reactions. If you go to Thermo, they'll tell you to use e z DNase, which is known to hit iBT reactions. Duplex DNA set NEB or DNase XT is known for is really designed for iBT reactions. They chose an enzyme, either being idiots or intentionally to leave some DNA behind because DNA is a nice adjuvant. They like adjuvants. Because of this, we're now getting 5,200 base pair pieces of DNA in these things, and, this is not nonfunctional DNA. This DNA, you can see, encodes all of this material with two different mammalian promoters. Mammalian promoters will signal the cells, mammalian cells, to make RNA from here into spike and from here into neo and can. So this is fully functional DNA even though the regulators have told you it's not. And they've probably come to that conclusion because they've never actually measured the length of these molecules or the relying of paper like the OX paper, which uses Illumina that can't actually amplify 5,000 base pair piece of DNA. That stuff can maybe amplify a 500 base pair piece of DNA and sequence it. Can't do 5,000. They can't see it. They're intentionally not looking with the right tools. Now this should piss you off because BioNTech knows about this. This is their paper, and they spell it out right here. The specific the specific activity of DNase one for RNA DNA hybrids, however, is at least a hundredfold below that for double stranded DNA, and they cite Sutton et al. Hundredfold. That's the number of what we're seeing in five different studies. They know the problem. They're aware of it, and they're still pointing regulators to look in the wrong place. K? So they need to be taking the manufacturer's own advice on this. Read their patents. QPCR only attempts to measure a 100 bases of DNA, and then there's a bunch of mathematical bullshit that goes on afterwards to try to claim how much DNA is there by saying, well, take a 100, measure it by you know, multiply it by 78, and that gives you an estimate for the full plasmid. And we'll just forget about the fragmentation issue that's going on here and how many primers drop out because of that. That that's probably immaterial when, in fact, it could be 90% of the DNA. It can't measure the E. Coli DNA that's there. It can't measure small DNA. That's that's beneath the size of the amplicon, and it can't look for unexpected DNA. It assumes it also assumes this uniform fragmentation, which doesn't occur. So as I mentioned before, there could be a hundredfold error here. There could be a hundredfold error here. You know, that gets you up to a 10,000 fold error rate. That's why when people are measuring this, there's nothing but argumentation in the literature because they say you have to use PCR. You can't use fluorometry. Well, that's an interesting comment. Because if you look through the docs, they use fluorometry to measure the dose of the drug, the RNA, and they try to claim that that's legitimate. You can use RNA or fluorometry to measure the RNA. You can't use it to measure the DNA because there's crosstalk in the DNA. Let's go over that crosstalk argument. The important thing about to know about fluorometry is it doesn't use primers. It has dyes that bind to to these minor grooves, which means you have to have double stranded material. RNA is usually single stranded, but in the case of these Pfizer vaccines and Moderna vaccines, the RNA is actually designed to fold back in itself and make double stranded minor grooves. They do that so that RNA lasts forever. And that does mean that there's more crosstalk than the manufacturers have reported on these dyes, but we can measure that and account for that by using enzymes that erase it. Okay. There's a limitation here that Giorgio spells out. Even using fluorometry, we're only gonna get 30% of the DNA signal when you chew it with DNA swan. And when you make these molecules shorter, the dyes don't bind as well. That's the the summary of the paper. So you have to compensate. Now we haven't been applying this compensation factor because, it's already over the limit, so multiplying it by 1.7 isn't gonna make it, you know, that much more of a difference, but people should know that this limitation exists. That after your DNAs choose something, you take if you take a 23 kilobytes molecule like they did here, measure it with pico green, you'll get one number. DNA is treated the same amount of DNA now is still in the vial. DNA does not destroy it. It just cuts it into smaller lengths. So it should stain to be the same amount, but only stains to be 30% of the signal. That tells you the dyes are not behaving on smaller DNA as well. Now they'll say qubit's not standardized, whatever. The most expensive molecular biology we do today is running Illumina sequencers because those runs are $20,000 a pull. So if you get the DNA concentration wrong, you've just blown $20. Alright? And how do you get it wrong? Well, if you if you underestimate it and put too much on, you'll you'll over cluster the sequencer, and it can't read anything. And if you under measure it by a factor of 10, you won't get a whole lot of sequence out, and your $20,000 run will effectively feel like a 200,000 run. Okay? So it's very important to get this right. And if you go to Illumina's manufacturing and recommendations and thermos, they'll tell you to use a qubit to get this thing right. In fact, the OX paper that tried to refute our work very poorly tried to claim you can't use the qubit to to measure the RNA. And what do they do when they actually go sequence the vaccine? They measure it with a qubit and put it on their luminaire because they do not wanna use their qPCR data to make that mistake. They know the qPCR data is all over the map, and it could easily over cluster or under cluster, and they get nothing. So that's a major contradiction in the Aux paper. They claim you can't use qubit to measure this, then they turn around and use it when they want to sequence the vaccine. Alright? That should tell you all you need to know. They are in fact conflicted and funded by pharma. So Sensible Biotech funds them, and they're an mRNA company. So when we do this properly with qubits, the one thing we do do is we put in 200 fold more RNase a than the manufacturer recommends to really make sure there's no question that we've eliminated the RNA. We do that over time series to make sure that its reaction's gone to completion. In this case, when you do 200 fold more RNase a, it's done in two minutes. Plateaus. Same signal at two at two minutes is at 10. In fact, you can do this and watch it in real time. It gets destroyed in seconds. The just the curve just drops right in front of your eyes. You can see it. And so we erase all the RNA, then we measure how much DNA is there. And in subsequent experiments, we've then gone further and said, okay. If it's truly DNA, hit it with DNase one XT and measure how much signal disappears after that because that's a very specific enzyme for just DNA. And that drops 240 nanograms when we do that. So we we know this is DNA because the end the RNA has erased it, and then we subsequently follow-up and erase what's remaining with the DNase. Alright? That's the best way to do this. And you'll see when you do this, you do not get a big difference between spike and ori. And so I might say, well, wait a minute. You guys said the vector gets fully destroyed. It gets just it gets cut into smaller pieces that still can stain, but it does not disappear like it does in PCR because it gets cut below the amplicon size. Remember, the amplicon size in PCR, the closest you can get those primers is probably 63 bases because you need to have a probe in between the two of them. 25 bases for each primer and 25 bases for a probe. That's as tight as you can get PCR to go. Thermometry, however, can pick up 20 bases. Alright? So we are seeing the same signal in Aury as we're seeing in spike because it is cut below the size the PCR can measure, and thorometry sees both. And then you can see the PCR in blue is all over the place. Alright? This is why people are arguing over what PCR does because it's entirely dependent on the fragmentation process and the distance the primer sit. So what does pharma use to measure the RNA? They use something called ribo green. So when people say you can't use fluorometry to measure the DNA, well, you're using it to measure the dose of the drug. And they'll say, yeah, but there's there's crosstalk with the DNA dyes. It's not true. This is this is just to re you know, solidify this point. This is the EMA document showing they're using thermometry. And then when they when they go to identify the RNA, they use that RT qPCR and spike, which is weird. That's Pfizer showing it as well. Here's the EMA measurements of 10 vials that Pfizer cherry picked for them. They vary by 815 fold, and the one outlier they claim as an incorrect DNA stock. You have to wonder how many times that is happening in production if they can't manage to get this straight on the 10 vials they cherry picked for the EMA. It's probably wider than that than 815 fold variants. So this is a known problem, and they've been cited for it. K. So let's look at ribo green. They say the crosstalk in the DNA side is too great. What is it on the RNA side? If you use ribo green, you get twice the amount of signal for DNA than you get for RNA on that dye. The crosstalk is 200 fold over the RNA signal. So here is ten ten micrograms of RNA. You put in ten micrograms of DNA, and you get twice the RFUs. And if you mix RNA and DNA, you end up on the top curve up here. And if your DNAs treat that, it comes right back down. There's two lines actually here superimposed at the at the at the bottom line. Alright? So this dye has 200% more signal for DNA than for RNA, and then they turn around and claim you can't use fluorometry to measure DNA when the documented crosstalk is this. This blue line is the RNA. Alright? It's like 7% of the signal that you get for DNA in the green line. If this were ribo green, the DNA signal, the crosstalk, would be twice as high as the as the the as as the RNA signal. So we're talking about probably two orders of magnitude difference in crosstalk on the dye that they're using to measure the dose. So they use fluorometry to measure the dose with a dye that has, you know, orders of magnitude more crosstalk and then turn around and say, you cannot use these dyes to measure the DNA when those dyes have orders of magnitude lower crosstalk than what they're using to measure the dose of the drug. This is a very incoherent argument that they have. It doesn't make any sense. Alright? So this is easily addressable by using RNase and enzyme. Okay? So, hopefully, that gave you some understanding of what's going on in process one versus process two and why there is a big charade going on here. But once you understand how they cherry picked assays to mislead all the regulators, you'll realize that they did this quite intentionally. They put they pointed them toward can during process one knowing they'd find nothing. When they went into process two, they knew they had to have CAN. However, they also know that that's not gonna find everything because the RNA DNA hybrid stuff is documented in their own papers, and it's been known since 1997. So I won't go through the rest of the presentation because I think you've seen this, but that hopefully explains the game of hide the ball that's going on that the regulators have not been quite getting their head around. So best of luck.
View Full Interactive Feed