reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
Zelensky (& the war in Ukraine) Fact vs Fiction. @jimmy_dore @krystalball @aaronjmate @ComicDaveSmith https://t.co/jl3cvLQEaW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukrainian comedian and actor Zelensky is now a leading candidate in the presidential election. Drawing parallels to his role in the TV series "Servant of the People," Zelensky's rise to power mirrors his character's journey. He has promised to address corruption and signed a decree to consolidate national digital TV channels. However, concerns have been raised about his handling of scandals and his suspension of political parties linked to Russia but not those associated with neo-Nazis. Criticisms have also been made about his actions against religious organizations. President Biden's recent visit to Ukraine was met with sirens, leading to speculation about the authenticity of the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The modern day of Zelensky is both the Ryan Seacrest and the Julia Louis Dreyfus Of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: A former actor and comedian.
Speaker 0: Now the unlikely front runner in this week's presidential election. Yes. Why are you doing this?
Speaker 2: Why are
Speaker 0: you doing this? Why not? This is my profession.
Speaker 1: Now life is imitating art. Of this series, Which was called the servant of the people. In the show, Zelensky's character was also an everyday man who rose to the country's Highest
Speaker 3: offers. Action.
Speaker 0: When it comes to your policies, what are you actually gonna do for this country?
Speaker 4: Of this scandal in the defense ministry For
Speaker 3: For a dozen high ranking Ukrainian officials who are stealing US aid money
Speaker 5: Zelensky has also signed a decree that combines all national Digital TV channels into one platform
Speaker 1: Clearly, a very crude, kickback type, scandal.
Speaker 5: Citing the importance of a unified information policy
Speaker 1: equivalent to all of the money donated by Ukrainian citizens for, feeding and supplying the armed forces.
Speaker 0: People don't know that The CIA got in bed with the right wing Nazis in Ukraine to overthrow the democratically elected government of Ukraine in 2014.
Speaker 5: President Zelensky has suspended Eleven political parties, they claim have links to Russia, and notably not the ultranationalist Linked to Neo Nazis Right. Parties, those ones are still good to go.
Speaker 0: Ukraine kept shelling the Donbas, which are the Russian King speakers in the eastern part.
Speaker 5: I've been very leery of the, like, the ones who's hero narrative.
Speaker 2: Himself is a very dark force. Banned a Christian faith in his country and arrested nuns and priests.
Speaker 6: Draft law are making it impossible for religious organizations affiliated with centers of influence In the Russian Federation to operate in Ukraine. This is about the future of the liberal world order, and we have to stand firm.
Speaker 0: The trip that president Biden took As many of you reported on, was it was brave. Many of you talked about how you heard the the sirens wailing.
Speaker 2: Yes. I can hear the siren. What what should we do? Nothing.
Speaker 3: I've been here for the past 5 days. I have not heard any explosions. I have not heard any air sirens Until about half an hour ago right when, president Biden was in the center of Kyiv.
Speaker 2: So here you have Potemkin air raid sirens, Just the touch required in this, the most tightly scripted, most completely designed for in history.
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
How world leaders spoke about Putin before the war in Ukraine. https://t.co/EG8utHIH7H
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two American speakers express trust in Vladimir Putin, with one stating that he found Putin to be straightforward and trustworthy. Another speaker praises Putin for his initial move towards democracy and describes him as very smart. The same speaker also mentions having a good relationship with Putin and states that he kept his word in their agreements. Another speaker acknowledges the challenges faced by the Russian president, including the need for economic restructuring and rebuilding civic society. This speaker believes it is understandable that Putin presents himself as a strong and patriotic leader. Lastly, one speaker expresses confidence in improved cooperation between NATO members and Russia. However, another speaker predicts that Putin will eventually take over all of Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this a man that Americans can trust? I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a very good dialogue. I was able to, get a sense of his soul.
I wouldn't have invited him to my ranch if I didn't trust him.
Speaker 1: Well, here's Biden 20 years ago praising Vladimir Putin for moving toward democracy. I'm close to amazed by how far Putin seems to have come in making throwing his lot with the West. I don't think anybody since Peter the Great has made such a significant, at least Initial move to the west.
Speaker 2: Mister Putin has got he got all he's very smart.
Speaker 0: Well, you know him better than most people.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think we had a really good blunt relationship.
Speaker 0: Did Putin ever renege on a personal agreement he made to you?
Speaker 2: He did not.
Speaker 0: So behind closed doors, he could be trusted?
Speaker 2: He kept his word in all the deals we made.
Speaker 3: We have to understand the scale of the problems that the president of Russia has to deal with, and they're unlike any of
Speaker 0: the problems that any
Speaker 3: of the problems that any of the rest of us in in the Western world have to deal with. I mean, he's dealing with an economy that needs absolutely fundamental restructuring, civic Society that needs to be rebuilt after the years of Communism and external relations that have a whole series of historical Legacies that have to be overcome. So I don't think it's surprising that he is and presents himself as a strong leader, as a patriotic leader for Russia.
Speaker 0: I am Confident that this new level of cooperation between NATO's members and Russia will now change the world and for the better.
Speaker 2: I got along with him great. But ultimately, he's gonna take over all of Ukraine.
@ricwe123 - Richard
The moment Washington started the conflict.... (Bucharest summit, 2008) #UkraineRussianWar #Ukraine #Russia
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has a strong partnership with NATO, supporting every NATO mission and helping in various peacekeeping efforts. They now seek to deepen their cooperation through a membership action plan, which the United States strongly supports. The US will make its position clear in Bucharest, advocating for MAP for Ukraine and Georgia. This move is in the interest of all alliance members and will enhance security and freedom in the region and globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we spend a lot of time talking about NATO. 1st, I do want to remind people that Ukraine and the NATO alliance have built a strong partnership. Ukraine is the only non NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan, in Iraq, Ukrainian troops are helping to support young democracies. In Kosovo, Ukrainians are help keep the peace.
Ukraine now seeks to deepen its cooperation with the NATO alliance through a membership action plan. Your nation has made a bold decision and the United States strongly supports your request. In Bucharest this week, I will continue to make America's position clear. We support MAP for Ukraine and Georgia. Helping Ukraine move toward NATO membership it's in the interest of every member in the alliance and will help advance security and freedom in this region and around the world.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHY A R E WE IN U K R A I N E ?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine is a significant hub for various illegal activities like human trafficking, narcotics trafficking, and weapons trafficking. There are concerns about money laundering and corruption as well. The media often misleads people about Ukraine, and there is a presence of Nazis in the country. One person shares a personal tragedy of losing their entire family to Ukrainian Nazis. They urge others to do their own research instead of blindly believing what they see on the screen. Additionally, there are dangerous facilities in Ukraine that need to be acknowledged, including bio labs that exist worldwide. Fact checkers often overlook these labs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is Ukraine so important? Well, it's a hub for human trafficking, specifically for child trafficking. It's a hub for narcotics trafficking. It's a hub for weapons trafficking. We know about our bio lab Where is this money going?
Money laundering? Money law? You name it.
Speaker 1: Because they're fed bullshit 247 over the media and about the Ukraine. I'm from the Ukraine. There's a large amount of Nazis in the Ukraine, and they actually killed my whole family. People better wake up and do some research on their own instead of buying what comes across on the screen. I try to shake them up, clock their mind control programming.
I do it for dog.
Speaker 2: There's something in those facilities that's dangerous, but a long time ago, this should have been acknowledged. Like, there are yes these labs is what they do because a lot of these fact checkers just they don't even mention labs because they don't even exist. They do. They exist all over the world.
@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven
Who is responsible for this? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 #UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #BRICS #china #india #africa #Trump #biden #EU #IsraeliCrimes #Palestine #Israel #PalestineUnderAttack #Palestina #Gazagenocide #gaza https://t.co/dDtek11w5K
@SprinterFamily - S p r i n t e r F a m i l y
🚨 “How many died in Gaza? https://t.co/tUrcWFLB13
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about Gaza and the conflict. They discuss casualties and bombings, with exaggerated numbers. Speaker 0 questions the truth of the information. They touch on hummus, falafel, and Albert Einstein's nationality. Speaker 0 confuses "Free Palestine" with "Free bread." The conversation ends with Speaker 0 saying goodbye.
Translation: The speakers discuss Gaza, casualties, and bombings, with exaggerated numbers. They mention hummus, falafel, and Albert Einstein's nationality. Speaker 0 confuses "Free Palestine" with "Free bread" and the conversation ends with a goodbye.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Where are you from?
Speaker 1: Do you know Iqal? Do you know the hamam?
Speaker 0: The what?
Speaker 1: Hamam. Gaza.
Speaker 0: I hear something like Gaza at a dying or something. I don't know. That one? Yes. People in Gaza, kids died.
Speaker 1: It's lie?
Speaker 0: It's lie?
Speaker 1: Omen. I'm dying for me.
Speaker 0: Oh my. Okay. You're in the army. I believe you. I believe you.
You're in the army. Of course. Of course you're telling the truth, you know. Wait. How many innocent people died in Gaza?
No one. No one died. 10,000 kids died in Gaza. Not true?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Wait. What happened on October 7th? Like, 10,000 kids in Israel?
Speaker 1: Yes. So much many people. I was in my house. What? Many sirena.
You know what sirena?
Speaker 0: Sirens.
Speaker 1: Oh, yes.
Speaker 0: Oh my siren's gonna you're gonna die from the siren.
Speaker 1: No. Not from
Speaker 0: the siren. Oh.
Speaker 1: From the, they are shooting rakita, you know?
Speaker 0: A rocket.
Speaker 1: Yeah. A big machine.
Speaker 0: Oh, like a machine rocket, like a 4th night. What? I heard also on the news they be like 2,000 babies.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: 22,000? Yeah. 2000? Did the Hamas bomb like like 20 hospitals in in Israel? Like that like 20 or something?
What's the number? How many? 20? 25?
Speaker 1: I think so. 20, 22. 22? Yeah.
Speaker 0: What? Like a 147,000 civilians were killed by Hamas in Israel? Yes. And this is that's the Nearly half a 1000000 kids died in in Israel from Gaza. Mhmm.
Like, 2,000,000 people worked in Israel by Gaza. Like, almost 7,000,000 of them worked Yeah. Yeah. Maybe like 20,000,000 at this point. That's not good.
They keep more than the population. No. That's actually not good. They 13,000,000,000 Israelis?
Speaker 1: All the time. You know
Speaker 0: what's happening? Like, 13,000,000,000. That's true. That's a lot.
Speaker 1: And you know, it's happening And
Speaker 0: they be they beheaded like what? Like, 5 50,000,000 babies or something? What? That's too much. I I actually the 50,000,000?
50,000,000 baby Was it like 50 or 54? You saw the pictures of the the 50,000,000 kids. You saw the pictures?
Speaker 1: Yeah. The pictures and video and everything.
Speaker 0: Do you have a video of these 2,000,000 people that were as well? Wow. So I've been getting lied this whole time on the news about Palestine, like there's no 20,000 in Gaza, like maybe maybe maybe 3 people. Do you meet other people on here that have never heard about Israel? You tell them that, like, 2,000,000 kids were killed and stuff?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: You know you know you know one thing I always hear, like, Arab people, they say they made, hummus. You guys made hummus. Right? Israeli?
Speaker 1: Everyone can make hummus. You know?
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. But the but the falafel but the falafel, that one is Israeli.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sure. You know Albert Einstein? It's a person. Albert Einstein.
Speaker 0: Oh, Albert Einstein. He was Israeli too. I was Jewish. Oh, was he also he was Israeli too, I heard.
Speaker 1: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: Sir? Sir? Free free Palestine. Wait. No.
No. No. Wait. Wait. Sorry.
Wait. What is it?
Speaker 1: Free bread.
Speaker 0: Oh, free is not real. It's not real? It's not real? How you say it? It's not real.
Did I say it I said it right. It's not real. Okay. Okay. Well, have a good one.
You take it easy, and it's not real. Bye bye. Bye bye.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
Why I'm interviewing Vladimir Putin. https://t.co/hqvXUZqvHX
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in Moscow to interview Russian President Vladimir Putin. The war in Ukraine has had significant global impacts, reshaping military alliances and the world economy. However, many English-speaking countries remain unaware of these changes due to corrupt and biased media outlets. While numerous interviews have been conducted with Ukrainian President Zelensky, no Western journalist has interviewed Putin. Americans have the right to know about a war they are involved in, and we have the right to inform them. Despite attempts to suppress this interview, it can be watched for free on our website. We encourage viewers to watch and make their own judgments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're in Moscow tonight. We're here to interview the president of Russia, Vladimir Putin. We'll be doing that soon. There are risks to conducting an interview like this, obviously, so we thought about it carefully over many months. Here's why we're doing it.
1st, because it's our job, or in journalism. Our duty is to inform people. 2 years into a war that's reshaping the entire world, most Americans are not informed. They have no real idea what's happening in this region, here in Russia or 600 miles away in Ukraine, but they should know. They're paying for much of it in ways they might not fully yet perceive.
The war in Ukraine is a human disaster. It's left 100 of 1000 of people dead, in entire generation of young Ukrainians, and it's depopulated the largest country in Europe. But the long term effects are even more profound. This war has utterly reshaped the global military and trade alliances, and the sanctions that followed have as well. And in total, they have upended the world economy.
The post World War 2 economic order, the system that guaranteed prosperity in the west for more than 80 years is coming apart very fast, and along with it, the dominance of the US dollar. These are not small changes, they are history altering developments. That will define the lives of our grandchildren. Most of the world understands this perfectly well. They can see it.
Ask anyone in Asia or the Middle East what the future looks like. And yet the populations of the English speaking countries seem mostly unaware. They think that is nothing has really changed, and they think that because no one has told them the truth. Their media outlets are corrupt. They lie to their readers and viewers, and they do that mostly by omission.
For example, since the day the war in Ukraine began, American media outlets have spoken to scores of people from Ukraine, and they have done scores of interviews with Ukrainian president Zelensky. We ourselves have put in a request for an interview with Zelensky. We hope he accepts, but the interviews he's already done in the United States are not traditional interviews. They are fawning pep sessions, specifically designed to amplify Zalenskiy's demand that the US enter more deeply into a war in Eastern Europe, and pay for it. That is not journalism.
It is government propaganda. Propaganda of the ugliest kind, the kind that kills people. At the same time, our politicians and media outlets have been doing this, promoting a foreign leader like he's a new consumer brand. Not a single Western journalist has bothered to interview the president of the other country involved in this conflict, Vladimir Putin. Most Americans have no idea why Putin invaded Ukraine, or what his goals are now.
They've never heard his voice. That's wrong. Americans have a right to know all they can about a war they're implicated in, and we have the right to tell them about it, because we are Americans too. Freedom of speech is our birthright. We were born with the right to say what we believe.
That right cannot be taken away no matter who is in the White House, but they're trying anyway. Almost 3 years ago, the Biden administration illegally spied on our text messages and then leaked the contents to their servants in the news media. They did this in order to stop a Putin interview that we were planning. Last month, we're pretty certain they did exactly the same thing once again, but this time we came to Moscow anyway. We are not here because we love Vladimir Putin.
We are here because we love the United States, and we wanted to remain prosperous and free. We paid for this trip ourselves. We took no money from any government or group, nor are we charging people to see the interview. It is not behind a paywall. Anyone can watch the entire thing shot live to tape and unedited on our website, tucker carlson.com.
Elon Musk, his great credit, has promised not to suppress or block this interview once we posted on his platform x, and we're grateful for that. Western governments, by contrast, will certainly do their best to censor this video on other less principle platforms because That's what they do. They were afraid of information they can't control, but you have no reason to be afraid of it. We are not encouraging you to agree with what Putin may say in this interview, but we are urging you to watch it. You should know as much as you can, and then like a free citizen and not a slave.
You can decide for yourself. Thanks.
@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™
@TuckerCarlson The truth about Russia and Ukraine. https://t.co/1W7AHktNcb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses US interference in Ukraine and its implications. It mentions the historical background of Western Ukraine siding with the Nazis during World War 2 and the emergence of extremist groups in Ukraine. It highlights the influence of the CIA, US State Department, and IMF in Ukraine's affairs, including orchestrating a coup against Yanukovych. The video also touches on the war in Ukraine and its impact on globalization. It suggests that the conflict is driven by the desire for control over Ukraine's resources and the deep state's involvement. It concludes by mentioning the need for dialogue and a "great reset" to address global issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. Operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector, neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine.
Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed, Yushchenko, in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer, that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by Western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych.
Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying you need Biden, and I said probably tomorrow for an Boy, and I get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing.
Speaker 2: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about coup Or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel, the very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jazz. The
Speaker 3: world's biggest investment fund says the war in Ukraine has put an And to globalization as we know it. Larry Fink is the chief executive of BlackRock. Countries and businesses are cutting ties with Russia. They're also imposing sanctions against the country, including cutting off its central bank from its foreign reserves, Fink predicts that with Russia's decoupling from the world, Governments and companies will reevaluate their supply chains and even consider reconsider the dependency in other nations.
Speaker 4: See, the truth is slowly gonna come out about what's really going on. And what's really going on is this. The Ukraine has been the center of Of the globalists for decades decades decades, 70 years at least, CIA, which is not a good organization, They're they're the the implementers of deep state, let's say. They've been working this in the Ukraine for 70 years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything. Why?
Because because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine. That's what this is all about. Particularly Eastern Ukraine, massive natural resources The CIA goes in, gets control of an American business interest, and they're not business. They're just robber barons. They're not legitimate businessmen.
They just wanna steal, and that's what goes on. And so they're taking that away from from the from Russia and the Ukraine. And on top of that, it's the center of the deep state. And so by Vlad Putin going in, he's cutting the head off the snake. Once the head comes off, the whole beast will die.
So that's what's actually going on, folks. So please, They are gonna tell you their stories about, possible nuclear war and Vlad's a bad man. This is the war with Russia that they wanted with Hillary Clinton as president because she lost The whole war against Russia was postponed. This is the plan they always had.
Speaker 5: This has been in the works going back to at least 2015, 2016. It was somewhat set back by the election of Donald Trump in the United States because Trump was not a globalist, but he was opposed to many of these schemes. What we're seeing now is a merger of the great reset, the green new deal, The policies on on COVID and a number of other aspects of of government policy, which is being directed not on behalf of sovereign governments, But against sovereign governments. And this is why we're seeing the situation in Ukraine. And what is Russia's crime?
Putin has asked for 20 years for security guarantees for Russia, and these guarantees include No further eastward expansion of NATO, which was promised to Gorbachev in 1990, which was promised again to Yeltsin in 1994, And yet NATO keeps moving to the very borders of Russia. Now they're talking about, as Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, did at the Munich Security Conference, That Ukraine has a right to develop nuclear weapons. And for Putin, Russia's security is directly threatened by 2 aspects u the Ukraine situation, the corruption which includes prominent Nazis in positions of the defense and security forces of Ukraine, The European Union actually acknowledged in 2018 that the defense and security forces of Ukraine were heavily infiltrated by Neo Nazis marching behind the banners of the Ukrainian SS, which joined Hitler in the 19 forties. And when Putin said you need u Vacation of Ukraine, he was called crazy. But the idea of a government, corrupt government being used not To defend the Ukrainian people's freedom and sovereignty.
And I hate to see what's being done to the people of Ukraine right now in this war, But they are the cannon fodder for a NATO and US and British drive to bring down Russia and China. Why? Because they're the 2 leading powers in the world that oppose giving up sovereignty to this Green New Deal and the Great Reset.
Speaker 6: I I don't have too many remedies. The the remedies have to be discussed through dialogue by the stakeholders of our global system, But, I just see the need for such a dialogue, and I see the need for action. I see the need for a great reset.
Speaker 7: To what extent would a reset be brought about by a change in the White House, the election of Joe Biden, for instance?
Speaker 6: I don't know. We first, we shouldn't speculate about the outcome of the election. We will see, beginning of November and Sunday, we we can in any case, we can, and so it's a World Economic Forum, is a very open and as a open platform to integrate everybody who is willing To address those issues in a spirit, which means, to exercise here, true global citizenship.
@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network
Who blew up Nord Stream? https://t.co/OV1py70Pjc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks who blew up Nord Stream, to which Speaker 1 jokingly replies that "we" did, implicating Speaker 0. Speaker 0 denies involvement and questions if there is evidence that NATO or the CIA did it. Speaker 1 avoids providing details but suggests looking for someone with an interest in such cases. Speaker 0 expresses confusion over the magnitude of the incident and suggests that if Speaker 1 had evidence, they should present it to win a propaganda victory. Speaker 1 claims it is difficult to defeat the United States in propaganda because they control global media, making it costly to get involved. They believe shining a spotlight on their sources of information won't yield results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who blew up Nord Stream?
Speaker 1: We. You for sure.
Speaker 0: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you have me? I did not pull up Nord Stream. Thank you, though.
Speaker 1: You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi.
Speaker 0: Do do you have evidence that NATO or CIA did
Speaker 1: You know, I won't get into details, but people always say in such cases, look for someone who is interested.
Speaker 0: But I'm confused. I mean, that's the biggest act of industrial terrorism ever, and it's the largest emission of CO2 in in history. Okay. So if you had evidence, and presumably given your security services, your intel services, you would, that NATO, the US, CIA, the West did this? Why wouldn't you present it and win a propaganda victory?
Speaker 1: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat the United States Because the United States controls all the world's media and many European media, the ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American Financial Institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, But it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network
Putin reveals which world leader crushed the Ukrainian peace treaty. https://t.co/PViTL3kFU1
Video Transcript AI Summary
As of February 2024, Speaker 0 asks if the person in question has the freedom to directly communicate with the speaker or their government to resolve the ongoing issues. Speaker 1 responds that the person considers themselves the head of state and won the elections. They believe that the coup d'etat in 2014 is the main source of power. Despite flaws in the government, the person is recognized as the president by the United States, Europe, and most of the world. Speaker 1 mentions negotiations with Ukraine in Istanbul, where the person was aware and even signed a preliminary document. However, they claim that former British Prime Minister Johnson dissuaded them from signing, leading to a sense of ridicule and sadness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But do you think at this point, as of February 2024, he has the latitude, the freedom to speak with you or your government directly about putting an end to this, which clearly isn't helping his country or the world. Can he do that, do you think?
Speaker 1: Why not? He considers himself head of state. Family. He won the elections. Although we believe in Russia that the coup d'etat is the primary source of power for everything that happened after 2014.
And in this sense, even today, government is flawed. But he considers himself the president, and he is recognized by the United States, all of Europe and practically the rest of the world in such a capacity. Why not? Again, we negotiated with Ukraine and Istanbul. We agreed.
He was aware of this. He even put his preliminary signature on the document I am telling you about.
Speaker 0: His But
Speaker 1: then he publicly stated to the whole world, we were ready to sign this document, but mister Johnson, his Then the prime minister of British Britain came and dissuaded us from doing this, saying it was better to fight Russia. And we agreed with this proposal. And the his fact that they obeyed the demand or persuasion of mister Johnson, the former prime minister of Great Britain, seems ridiculous and very sad to me. Premium.
@TCNetwork - Tucker Carlson Network
When was the last time Biden and Putin spoke? https://t.co/NcZhKEix71
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 cannot recall the last time they spoke to Joe Biden and dismisses the need to remember everything. They acknowledge that Biden funds the war they are involved in but claims to have spoken to him before a special military operation. Speaker 1 expresses their belief that Biden is making a historic mistake by supporting actions in Ukraine that push Russia away. When asked about Biden's response, Speaker 1 suggests asking him directly as it is not appropriate for them to comment. They confirm that they have not spoken to Biden since before February 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When was the last time you spoke to Joe Biden?
Speaker 1: I cannot remember when I talked to him. I do not remember.
Speaker 0: You don't remember?
Speaker 1: No. Do I have to remember everything? I have my own things to do. We have domestic political affairs.
Speaker 0: Well, he's funding the war that you're fighting, so I would think that would be
Speaker 1: Well, yes. He funds, but I talked to him before the special military operation, of course. And I said to him then, by the way, I believe that you are making a huge mistake of historic proportions by supporting everything that is happening Take of historic proportions by supporting everything that is happening there in Ukraine by pushing Russia away. I told him told him repeatedly, by What
Speaker 0: what did he say?
Speaker 1: Ask him, please. It is easier for you. You are a citizen of the United States. Go and ask him. It is not appropriate for me to comment on our conversation.
Speaker 0: But but but you haven't spoken to him since before February of 2020
Speaker 1: No. We haven't spoken.
@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Here’s the truth about the war in Ukraine https://t.co/pBf4XkTO21
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle it on favorable terms. They argue that the US spends a significant amount of money on military contracts and expanding NATO. The speaker criticizes the allocation of funds, stating that the money could have been used to address homelessness. They also mention that the war will require further expenses for rebuilding. The speaker suggests that politicians and defense manufacturers benefit from this situation, referring to it as a money laundering scheme. They question the loan given to Ukraine and its repayment prospects. The speaker highlights the loan conditions imposed, including austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the ownership of these corporations, specifically mentioning BlackRock. The speaker concludes by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions unchecked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a war that should have never happened. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors and want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why?
Because then that country has to conform its military purchases and NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, North Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed and get a trapped market. March of 2022, we committed a $113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that 2 months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big expenses are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild all the things that we destroy.
Mitch McConnell was asked, and we really afford to set to spend a 113,000,000,000 to Ukraine. He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme.
And who do you think owns every one of those companies? And BlackRock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan.
Raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? And if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions.
And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number 1, extreme austerity program. So if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number 2, most important, Ukraine has and put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a 1000 years of war fought over that land.
It's the richest farmland in the world. It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about this long condition.
They've already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah.
BlackRock. And then in December, president Biden and gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? And Iraq. So they're doing this right in front of us.
They don't even care that we know anymore because they know and that they can get away with it. And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old, old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us hating on each other.
They keep the republicans and democrats fighting each other and black against white and all these divisions that they saw.
@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed
HOW AMERICA SEES UKRAINE V PALESTINE https://t.co/SGSlKYpyxh
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's hard to see those images and think any rational leader would do that. We can all agree on his wickedness. War is brutal, messy, and innocent people will suffer. I wish it wasn't true, but it is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's difficult to look at the Sorry. It's difficult to look at some
Speaker 1: of the images and imagine that any well thinking, serious, mature leader would do that. So I can't talk to his psychology, but, I think we can all speak to his depravity. This is war. It is combat. It is bloody.
It is ugly, And it's gonna be messy. And innocent civilians are going to be hurt going forward. I wish I could tell you something different. I wish that that wasn't gonna happen, but it is it is going to happen.
@TNTJohn1717 - PaulsCorner21
What Really Happened Yesterday? https://t.co/WuusjZDOJb
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the eclipse, I captured something unusual in the sky, not a lens flare. The sun we see might be a projection from the sun in the firmament. My friend also saw this with a solar filter. The Bible mentions the sun in the firmament, hinting at layers. Reflecting off different layers, we see more during an eclipse. If you're open-minded, question the heliocentric model and seek truth. You can stick to comfortable beliefs or pursue knowledge that may reveal a created world. Remember, this is just my opinion, and I recommend David Weiss' app for more on Flat Earth. Use code "fit flat" when signing up. Have a good day.
Translation: The speaker discusses capturing a strange sight during the eclipse, suggesting the sun we see may be a projection from the sun in the firmament. They urge viewers to question the heliocentric model, seek truth, and consider a created world. They recommend David Weiss' app for more information on Flat Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you don't think anything happened crazy during the eclipse today? Well, are you sure you were paying attention? Because I captured something crazy. This is the sun. That's a lens flare.
So you tell me what that is. It's not a lens flare. And I've been saying for a while that the sun we see is just a projection from the sun in the firmament. And not only did I catch it, but my friend Brandon Thomas, who has the Expanding Reality podcast, used a solar filter, and not only caught 1, but he caught 2. And you guys might not be bible believers, and that's okay because I wasn't either until I realized we didn't live on a globe.
But if you look at what the Bible says, it talks about the sun being in the firmament. And not only that, but there being layers of the firmament. So if the sun was in the firmament, maybe we are seeing the reflections in the different layers of the firmament where usually we just see the projection right here, and usually we can never see that reflection because the sun is so bright that it washes everything out. But when it's partially eclipsed as seen by the lens flare, we see. And if you're an intellectually honest person and you see things like this that don't make sense in the heliocentric model, you really need to ask yourself, do I continue to believe what I've always believed, or should I seek truth?
Truth that might just set you free and let you know that we're in a place that was created just for us. And the beautiful thing is the choice is yours. You can stay in your beliefs because it's comfortable. It's comfy. It's cozy little blanket, or you can take the hard road and seek truth and true knowledge.
But as always, this is just my opinion. You know I'm just a satire count purely for entertainment purposes. And I have to give credit where credit is due. David Weiss, the man the man who created this app, was the first person to ever show me that the sun we see might just be a projection from the source inside the firmament. So go download his app.
It's a wealth of information involving Flat Earth. Use my code fit flat when you sign up, and have a good day.
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia has become an enemy of the West due to its size and resources, which have historically attracted conquest. The US Neo-Cons had plans to control Russia's resources, but Putin's refusal to submit to US hegemony changed the game. Putin's speech at the OSCE Security Conference in 2007 solidified his status as the new enemy of the West.
@MEtirol - etirol 𝕊
⁉️ How did Russia become an enemy of the West ⁉️ There are solid reasons why the hegemonic West is so hostile towards Russia. The sheer size of the country with all its resources has always been an incentive for the West to conquer it. Napoleon and Hitler proved this in the past. More recently, it was the US Neo-Cons who had a firm plan to take over Russia. In 1998, former US Secretary of State M. Albright is reported to have said at a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Yevgeny Primakov: Russia has the greatest natural resources in the whole world and that annoys Albright. In her opinion, these resources should not be controlled by Russia alone in future, but by several countries, of course under the supervision of the USA. Under Yeltsin, the US and the west had full access to Russia and began to plunder the country with the help of the corrupt Russian oligarchs: (click link: https://t.co/5AvDwXYdL7 ). When Putin came to power, the game changed. He was not prepared to bend the knee to the US hegemon and insisted on Russia's sovereignty. Putin's legendary speech at the OSCE Security Conference in Munich in 2007 is impressive testimony to this. The Neo-Cons have never forgiven him for this and have systematically shaped him into the new enemy of the West with their media an think tanks. Here are the most important excerpts from Putin's speech at the OSCE Security Conference in Munich in 2007.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the unipolar model, stating it's impossible in today's world due to lack of moral foundations. They condemn the US for overstepping its boundaries in various aspects, making no one feel safe. NATO's expansion is seen as a provocation, with American bases near Russia's borders. The speaker asserts Russia's long history of independent foreign policy won't change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today's world. And this is not only because if there was individual leadership in today's and precisely in today's world, then the military, political and economic resources would not suffice. What is even more important is that the model itself is flawed because at its basis, there is and can be no moral foundations for modern civilization. One state and, of course, the first and foremost, the United States has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural, and educational policies it imposes on other nations.
Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this? It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasize this. No one feels safe because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them.
Of course, such a policy stimulates an answer. But what is happening at the same time? Simultaneously, the so called flexible frontline American bases appear in Bulgaria and Romania with up to 5 1,000 men in each. It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders and we continue to strictly fulfill the treaty obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernization of the alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe.
On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that And what And what happened to the assurances our Western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? Russia is a country with a history that spans more than a 1000 years and has practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy. We are not going to change this tradition today.
@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number
. 🟰🟰Why Was Gaddafi killed?🟰🟰 . https://t.co/DqKaSmO1bN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Muammar Gaddafi was killed because he was working with other African leaders to establish Africa's first Central Bank, which would have backed its currency with the continent's natural resources. This move threatened the global economic order dominated by currencies not backed by resources. Gaddafi's assassination was to prevent the creation of a Central Bank of Africa and the end of modern slavery and neo-colonialism on the continent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why was Muammar Gaddafi killed? Muammar Gaddafi was murdered because he along with the other African heads of state were about to bring into existence Africa's 1st Central Bank. They were erecting a central bank in Africa which was going to do what? Back its money to the resources under the ground in Africa. Now, what would that have done to the global economic order?
Remember, the United States dollar isn't back on any natural resource. The British pound isn't back on any natural resource. The Canadian dollar, the European Union, their currency isn't back on any natural resource because Europe doesn't have a lot of natural resource. Africa does. So if they would have been successful in creating a Central Bank of Africa coming up with a unitary currency and then backing that currency to the material wealth under the soil, they would have bankrupt every other economic system in this world from America to Europe to China.
That was revolution. And that's why Muammar Gaddafi had to be assassinated because he was about to help the African heads of state eliminate modern slavery and neo colonialism from the continent.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
RFK JR. Devastates Military Industrial Complex By Explaining True Reasons Behind Russia / Ukraine War https://t.co/wLDVeOuKtE
@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom
The Ukraine war explained. F++k the US government. https://t.co/7GVAKDeIsl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukraine war has deep historical roots, starting with NATO's expansion after the Cold War, which Russia viewed as a betrayal of promises made during German unification. Key events include the U.S. withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002, the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and U.S. involvement in Ukraine's regime change in 2014. Despite Russia's calls to halt NATO's eastward expansion, the U.S. continued its military presence near Russian borders. In late 2021, Russia proposed a security agreement to prevent NATO enlargement, which was rejected. The conflict escalated into war, with significant Ukrainian casualties, as the U.S. and its allies encouraged Ukraine to resist rather than negotiate peace. The narrative surrounding the war often overlooks these complexities, presenting a simplified view of aggression and defense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just explain in 2 minutes the Ukraine war. This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990, February 9, 1990. James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move 1 inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War 2. And, Gorbachev said that's very important.
Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic.
At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, the US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much.
But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American, actually asked maybe we should join NATO, when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then 911 came, then came, Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah.
We'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came 2 other decisive actions. In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event, never discussed in this context.
But what it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat to national security by making possible a decapitation strike of missiles that are a few minutes away from Moscow. And we put in 2 Aegis missile systems. We say it's defense. Russia says, how do we know it's not Tomahawk nuclear tipped missiles in your silos? You've told us we have nothing to do with this.
And so we walked out of the ABM Treaty unilaterally in 2002. And then in 2003, we invaded Iraq on completely phony pretenses as I've explained. In 2,004, 5, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine, the so called first color revolution. It put in office somebody that I knew and was I was friends with, and and kind of distantly friends with president Yushchenko, because I was an adviser to the Ukrainian government in 1993, 94, 95. And then the US had its dirty hands in this.
It should not meddle in other countries' elections. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down, for Ukraine. That calmed things down because the US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian.
What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in February 22, 2014, the United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation. Have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor.
They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now. And if you know her name and what she's done, have sympathy for me. Really. Between her and, the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piatt, who's a senior state department official till today. And they talked about regime change.
They said, who's gonna be the next government? Why don't we pick this one? No Klitschko shouldn't go in. It should be. Ah, yes.
It was, and we'll get we'll get the big guy, Biden, to come in and do an attaboy, they say, you know, pat them on the back. It's great. So they made the new government, and I happened to be invited to go there soon after that, not knowing any of the background. And then some of it was, in a very ugly way, explained to me after I arrived how the US had participated in this. All of this is to say, the US then said, okay.
Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 7 more countries in the not 1 inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but the US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems After breaking a treaty, 2019, we walked out of the Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty.
In 2017, we walked out of the JCPOA, the treaty with Iran. This is the partner. This is the trust building. In other words, it's completely reckless US foreign policy. On December 15, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement.
You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war.
Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announced that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen?
Why don't you announce? And he said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan.
Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. You have to have some prudence.
There's no such thing as an open door that we're gonna be there, and we're gonna put our missile systems there, and that's our right. There's no right to that. We declared in 18/23, Europeans don't come to the Western Hemisphere. That's the Monroe doctrine. The whole Western Hemisphere after all.
Okay. Anyway, they turned down the negotiations. Then the special military operation started. And 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay.
Neutrality. And then the Turks said, we'll we'll mediate this. And I flew to Ankara to discuss it with the Turkish negotiators because I wanted to hear exactly what was going on. So what was going on was they reached an agreement with a few odds and ends. And then the United States and Britain said, no way.
You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.
Absolutely ghastly. So when you think about your question, we have to understand we're not dealing with as we're told every day with this madman like Hitler coming at us and violating this and violating that, and he's gonna take over Europe. This is complete bogus fake history that is a purely PR narrative of the US government, and it doesn't stand up at all to anyone that knows anything. And if you try to say a word of this, I got completely cut out of the New York Times back in 2022 after writing my whole life columns for them. Oh, I'd send this.
Okay. And by the way, online, it's not even space. You know? There's no limit. They can publish 700 words.
They would not publish, since then, 700 words for me about what I saw with my own eyes, about what this war is about. They won't do it. We're playing games here. So God forbid, a nuclear power comes at us. I don't know what's gonna happen, but we came at them, and we should stop going after China and Taiwan.
@frontlinekit - Richard Woodruff 🇺🇦
We're in Ukraine. Here's why. https://t.co/Z079hmx548
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good morning. I'm Richard Woodruff from Lviv, Ukraine. I want to address Tucker Carlson. Real Americans and freedom-loving citizens from Britain and Europe have stood with Ukraine for over a thousand days. Meanwhile, you sit in Moscow, enjoying cocktails while ignoring the genocide happening here. You have no understanding of the situation, and history will remember your actions during this invasion. People will look back and see you as someone who supported the Russians for personal gain. Tucker, you are condemned for your stance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning. My name is Richard Woodruff from Lviv Ukraine. And I wanna say to
Speaker 1: a Tucker Carlson sorry. Tucker Carlson that real Americans stand with Ukraine. The real Americans have been here for 1014 days. Real freedom loving British and European citizens have been here for over a 1000 days standing with the Ukrainians. And what do you do?
You sit in Moscow, the powerful elite, elite, sipping cocktails and champagne, laughing about the genocide of Ukrainians. Right? That's exactly what you're doing right now. You have absolutely no idea, you fucking worthless man, and I'm glad all of humanity and all of history will know exactly what you have done. And people will look back at this genocidal invasion and say Tucker Carlson.
He was the one simping for the Russians. All for a little bit of that blood money. Hey, Tucker. Fuck you.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
❗What's Their Plan👇 https://t.co/eM38Y7tkeS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The world’s current state of division and strife is not accidental; it is the result of a meticulously planned control system. Central banks, primarily owned by the Rothschild banking empire, dictate financial policies and trap nations in debt. Money, a mere piece of paper, serves as a tool of enslavement, lacking intrinsic value. Historical figures like JFK and Abraham Lincoln attempted to free the American people from this control by issuing their own currency, but both faced dire consequences. The true power lies with those who control money, as they influence governments, corporations, and societal structures. Today, every country operates as a corporation, diminishing the rights of individuals and reinforcing a system where corporations hold more power than people, effectively turning society into a form of slavery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The plot in the country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot. 7 days later He died. The stuff that's going on around us today just doesn't make any sense. And as we go through this presentation, you'll start to realize why it doesn't make any sense and that all of this is not by accident, that all of this misery and strife in the world today is actually by design.
Why is the world divided like this? It is not by accident. All of this is by very meticulously planned action. It is all done by design through the control systems that run our world. All you gotta do at all times is follow the money.
You'll get to the top and discover the Rothschild banking empire and their cronies, the banking families, and what is often referred to as the royal political elite. These families that control the world did not suddenly come into power in the last 100 years. We are talking about 1,000 of years of royal bloodline control of the world. The Rothschilds and the other banking families pretty much own all the central banks of the world. This is a shock to the system.
The central banks of the world like the Federal Bank of America, the Bank of England, the South African Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia, India, Brazil, all the central banks of all the countries of the world do not belong to the people. They are owned private entities that are controlled and owned by the Rothschild banking empire. And they set the norms, the rules, and the financial policies for the countries, and they lend money to the countries, the governments and the presidents and the prime ministers and the ruling parties of the different countries. And this is why we are constantly trapped in a cycle of debt because the banks that print our money do not belong to its people. What is money really?
Well, money is just an idea. It's a piece of paper. It's a tool of enslavement. And what you will learn here is that money is not something that evolved over 1000 of years of bartering and trading as a tool that can help humanity prosper. No.
It's exactly the opposite. Money was a tool of enslavement that was conjured up a long time ago and introduced as a complete and whole philosophy and a tool of enslavement. It's just a piece of paper that controls our lives. It burns and disappears. Where did money come from?
How did money originate? Very few people are actually aware of this. Well, about 6000 years ago, the first money appeared in the form of clay tablets. This is during the Sumerian empire. Well, the Sumerian texts tell us about when money first appeared and also when the first royal bloodlines first appeared.
And we find the emergence of the 1st kings or the so called first priest kings. And it just so happens that these first priest kings that appeared out of the blue on earth suddenly created all the banks. They created their temples. And in their temples, they started to print these clay tablets, which became the first forms of money. So in essence, the temples of these first kings that appeared on earth were the first banks from which the first forms of money were distributed to the people.
And nothing has changed in 1,000 of years. This is really important. So what if I told you that banks create money out of thin air? Would you be surprised? Well, that's exactly what happens.
They have nothing. Money is absolutely useless. It is a piece of paper. It has no backing, and this is why it's called fiat currency, fiat money. It means nothing.
It is valueless. It has no value. The only reason it has value is because we, the people, think it has value and is given to us as a piece of paper that has some sort of value. And we trade it and use it and go around and kill each other for it and rob banks for it and go to jail for it and do it controls our lives from the first moment we are born to the last moment as we die. Money controls our lives.
Many famous people and smart people and businessmen of the past have been aware of this for a long time. Like this quote from Henry Ford, for example. He said, it's well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system. For if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. Henry Ford, many people, many great leaders of the past have resisted money, have resisted the bankers.
JFK tried to break the America free from the federal bank, Federal Reserve Bank stranglehold on the people of the United States. This is a quote 7 days from before he died. He says, there is a plot in the country to enslave every man, woman, and child. Before our leaders high and noble office, I intend to expose this plot. 7 days later, he died.
What you need to know is JFK actually started to print what became known as the American or the United States note, which is not printed by the Federal Reserve Bank and therefore taking the control away from the Fed. As soon as they they assassinated him in Dallas in 1963, within 2 weeks or so, the Fed started to print the American money again, taking that control back. And this happened also with, Abraham Lincoln who 100 years before that started to print the greenback in the United States, making the American people free of all debt. And the greenback was printed by the government who didn't belong to the Federal Bank of the Rothschild Empire. This was obviously not liked and they could lost control.
This is why they shot him and got rid of him because he didn't play their game. Who controls our government? Who controls the the bankers? Who controls what's going on here? Many people around the world call these the puppet masters.
We don't know who they are because they don't want us to know who they are. Quote from mayor Amschel Rothschild, the founding father of the Rothschild empire in the 1700. He says, let me issue and control a nation's money, and I care not who writes the laws. And that's exactly what has become of the world and our countries because through the banking institutions, they control everything. Think about how money and the bankers control all the education systems, the research laboratories, how they control industry, the large corporations.
Everything imaginable ultimately goes back to those who control the money. Follow the money, and you'll see the root of evil and the root of control as it unfolds around us. Who controls the corporations? Once again, follow the money. Always leads back to the Rothschilds banking empire.
But unfortunately, in our legal systems, corporations have more rights than living, breathing human beings. Think about that. This is unimaginable that something like this could even happen. Many people are shocked when they find out that every country in the world is registered as a corporation. It's not just countries.
It's states, provinces, cities, everything imaginable. The roads that we drive on are registered as corporations. Everything in our lives has been incorporated around us while we carry on and distracted by computer games and the news and who's screwing who, and who won what game, and what final is being played, while we're being distracted by the entertainment and the programming on our televisions. Our world around us has been stolen from us and incorporated. And this is how, through the legal system and the corporations that have more rights than living, breathing human beings, We The People have become slaves to the corporations every step of the way.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
What caused the fires in California? https://t.co/Hau9kn5ukh
Video Transcript AI Summary
We’ve identified a key factor in the fires: climate change. But what does that really mean? Since 1964, California has engaged in weather modification, which raises questions about its impact. Reports indicate that efforts to augment rainfall have gone wrong, leading to significant flooding. When these programs ceased, rainfall diminished, contributing to fire risks. This situation suggests that the issue may not solely be climate change but rather ongoing weather manipulation. The trails seen in the sky could be linked to these operations, reminiscent of tactics used in Vietnam. Historical context shows that these practices date back to the 1950s, prompting further investigation into their implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it seems we found the culprit of the fires. Let's take a listen. Climate change is real. So climate change, you say? What does that look like?
Weather modification operations in California since 1964, changing the weather. And what's weird is when I look at the licenses for that one, check that, PG and E. Then someone might say, 19 sixties. No way. Well, here's 2024.
Look at all the states engaging and altering the weather on a regular basis. And this one's straight out of the LA Times. Check this out. They were augmenting the rainfall, but then it went horribly wrong. Remember the flooding that took place in California?
And here's a little chart on that one. See how there's no more rain? That's because they stopped that program of creating the rain, which would lead to fires. Interesting. And what's wild is they say all of this is safe and effective.
We know that slogan from 2020. Check this. So I kinda look at it like, it doesn't really seem like climate change. That's for sure. It sure seems like it's being augmented on the regular basis, and it has been for a very long period of time.
Look at those airplanes. It's kinda like the trails you see up in the sky, and then all of a sudden a fire breaks out. Isn't that what they use in Vietnam? Since there's always a counter, people should look into the Wilhelm Wright Cloudbusters. Ever wonder why you went to jail?
19 fifties is when all this began.
@FrankFurter420a - Frank Furter
@LFJIreland @HellofromSuMar The truth about the Ukraine war in 3 minutes https://t.co/UDJ4nOjvhZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
- "This is a war that should have never happened."
- "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine."
- "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000."
- "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme."
- "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock."
- "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe."
- "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine."
- "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a war that should have never happened. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why?
Because then that country has to conform its military purchases to NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, North Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed, get a trapped market. March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that two months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big expenses are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild you all the things that we destroyed.
Mitch McConnell was asked, can we really afford to spend spend a 113,000,000,000 to Ukraine? He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme.
And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan.
So raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? Because if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions.
And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number one, of extreme austerity program so that if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number two, most important, Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a thousand years of war fought over that land. It's the richest farmland in the world.
It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about this long condition. They've already sold 30% of it.
The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah. BlackRock.
And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra. So they're doing this right in front of us. They don't even care that we know anymore because they know that they can get away with it.
And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us
@TruthSeek01011 - TruthSeeker01011
Why is the EU and NATO trying to push a war with Russia and how many Europeans would be willing to die for EU bureaucratic losers who are replacing you with the 3rd world. https://t.co/NEiGwCzbzz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization should be abolished. They claim there are numerous European “x” accounts aiming to provoke Western Europeans to go to war with Russia because Western funding for Ukraine is dwindling, and they say these actors want to attack Russia regardless of US backing.
A self-proclaimed “Gunther” is featured as a controversial figure who says he’s part of NATO, but the speaker notes that NATO publicly denies knowing him and that Gunther formed his own NGOs without funding. The speaker highlights Gunther’s post: Europeans will never be slaves. In response, the speaker asks why Gunther would arrest people for telling the truth online and trying to enslave them in a digital prison; they claim Gunther is misrepresenting online repression and compare digital punishment to real torture.
The speaker cites a German police investigation of a Gab user who called a female politician fat, emphasizing the use of the term fat as quoted in the post. They challenge Gunther by asking if the photo shows a Victoria’s Secret model, implying a discrepancy between appearances and claims, and label Gunther as aligning with “the EU’s bitches” and lacking sovereignty. They accuse Hungary of being fined a million dollars a day for not accepting “undesirables,” asserting EU law requires such intake and that white Europeans are urged to fight against Russia while others (described in demeaning terms) contribute less.
The speaker argues that Western Europe is dependent on the United States, stating that the US is the biggest financier of NATO and possesses the most powerful military, and that Europeans would be abandoned without US support. They remark that Gunther’s post demonstrates this dependence, noting Gunther’s post about Trump wanting to win and withdraw the US Navy from European seas, which would leave Europe exposed to Russia and Iran. The speaker mocks Gunther’s attempt to lead a European naval force and requests continued US Navy presence for a decade to help.
Overall, the speaker frames a narrative of European subservience to the United States, critiques of EU sovereignty, and hostility toward Western multinational institutions, while repeatedly referencing Gunther as a focal figure in these exchanges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The European Union, the UN, and the WHO all need to be abolished. I'm seeing a lot of x accounts from Europe trying to rile up Western Europeans to go to war with Russia because they can't fund enough money in the Ukraine anymore, and now they're basically going to go after the entire country of Russia. And now they're saying things like, oh, well, if The United States doesn't wanna back us, we'll go in there by ourselves with what? Tampons, soy boys, tight pants, men who cross their legs when they sit, bunch of pussies. That's that's who you're gonna bring into a war with Russia.
Love to see that. You know what I mean? But there's this guy named Gunther, who's a self proclaimed moron, who says that he's part of NATO, but even NATO went online and was like, we don't know this loser. So he made his own NGOs that nobody is funding because he's a loser. But I'm seeing these accounts pop up and basically saying that America, they don't need them and America this, but he took the bait.
So let me just show you. Gunther here writes, Europeans will never be slaves. No. Nobody. So I wrote, then why are you arresting people for telling the truth online and trying to enslave them into digital prison?
Gunther dummy took the bait. He goes, these mega Americans have lost it. How come you can equate a real Russian torture chamber with a digital prison? How come you can claim we arrest people for telling the truth online when we arrest mainly Nazis for instigating hate crimes online? If we were really so bad, your accounts would all be gone long time and forever.
German police investigate Gab user for calling female politician fat, and fat is in quotes. This is the politician in question. So let me ask you something, Gunther. Do you see a Victoria's Secret model in that picture, or are we both seeing the same thing? Because it's true.
You guys are bitches to the EU. You're not sovereign. That's why Hungary is getting fined a million dollars a day because they don't want the undesirables in their country. You are literally, by law, required to take in these undesirables, and now you're telling white Europeans to go fight for you dummies, and fight against Russia. Well, what?
You bringing all the Mohammed's who are pretty much, like, not contributing anything to society, skyrocketing rapes, skyrocketing, crimes such as burglaries, and I've got the statistics to show it in case, you know, decide to bitch about this little video. But let me just show you this because you actually admitted you guys are a bunch of pussies without The United States because you know The United States is the biggest financer to NATO and also has the most powerful military in the world. And let's face it, you'd be a DEI hire if you tried to get in, but you admitted it in this post. Gunther here with his titties out, writes, if Trump vants win and withdraw US Navy from European seas and will leave us as easy prey to Russia and Iran, yeah, because you're pussies, right, without The United States, what are you gonna do about it? It will end up me, admiral, which is fake.
He's not, felling her yawn to lead European naval force to victory. Wish me luck. But please, at US Navy, if you could stay around a decade, it would help. So you're admitting your pussy and you'd be a nobody without The United States, but then you're shitting on them online. Okay.
Cheers.
