reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 11, 2023 at 12:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a forgotten time, DC transformed into a prison, with National Guards deputized as US Marshals. We witnessed a dystopian inauguration filmed over days. Was J6 a cover for a larger psyop? Welcome to the psywar, where things aren't what they seem. The military was the only solution.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

How does everyone forget when DC was literally shut down and turned into a prison. The same time thousands of NG were deputized as US Marshals. The same time we watched that dystopian version of an inauguration filmed over the course of multiple days. We are to believe it was all bc of the J6 psyop? Or was J6 a cover for the larger psyop? Nothing is as it seems. For those just starting to see, welcome to the psywar. Military was the only way.

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

Who remembers when the National Guard took an oath to act as US Marshals for 1 year right before "Joe Biden's" inauguration? What are the duties of a US Marshal? The duties of the U.S. Marshals Service include protecting the federal judiciary, apprehending federal fugitives,… https://t.co/c1P5pbDkjW

Video Transcript AI Summary
I solemnly swear to support and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I will faithfully and loyally serve the city, taking this obligation freely and without hesitation. I will fulfill the duties of the officers, including special officers, from today until January 24, 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you swear or affirm that I will support and defend the constitution of the United States against all Enemies, foreign and domestic, that will bear true faith and allegiance to the city that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. The duties of the officers special officers that are here starting today to January 24, 2020

@BrainStorm_Joe - Joe Rambo

Translation: I Donald Trump have made moves and signed orders so that we can put the government on pause. During this period, we will run a multi layered psyop for multiple reasons. Our country was infiltrated. Our citizens were divided and lulled into slavery. To…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights the importance of pausing and acknowledges that it reveals the mistakes made by others. They believe that this will make it easier for them to do a better job in the future. The speaker suggests that because everyone can see the poor performance over a two-year period, it will be easier for them to accomplish what needs to be done in the next four years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one of the beautiful things of the pause, if there is such a thing as a beautiful thing, one of the the important factors of the pause is that we see how bad they've done. So we will be able to do it properly, and it will be much easier. Everybody will agree with us because everybody sees what a bad job has been done during this 2 year period, and it will be a 4 year period. Everybody sees that. It will be much easier for us to do what has to be done.
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 1:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, a series of events unfolded at the Capitol that raised questions and revealed inconsistencies. Despite media narratives, former President Trump called for peace and urged protesters to go home. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 was in place in 2021, allowing objections to the Electoral Count. Contrary to initial reports, no police officers died that day, and some suicides occurred later. The Capitol Police Chief was silenced, and there were indications of a setup. Antifa's presence and FBI involvement were also revealed. Ray Epps, a person of interest, had a disturbing past. Entrapment and undercover identifiers further suggest a setup. The truth behind January 6 continues to emerge.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 MASTER THREAD 🧵 JANUARY 6 BOOKMARK THIS THREAD! I am releasing everything I have collected over the years into this one thread. This post will be updated a few posts at a time & all future information will be dropped into this post. Let’s begin…

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite the mockingbird media saying that Donald Trump “incited an insurrection”, this was his message on January 6… “I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have Law & Order. We have to respect our great people in Law & Order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s been a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this, where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us. From me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have PEACE. So go HOME. We LOVE YOU. You’re very SPECIAL. You’ve seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go HOME And go HOME in PEACE.” 🙏 This Video https://rumble.com/v34gqif-donald-trump-tells-january-6-protestors-to-go-home-in-peace.html You can watch Trumps full speech on January 6 here https://rumble.com/v34gpbn-january-6-trumps-speech-at-the-save-america-march-in-washington-dc.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your pain and hurt. The election was stolen from us, even though it was a landslide victory. We need to go home now and prioritize peace, law and order. We must respect our law enforcement and avoid anyone getting hurt. This is an unprecedented time where they could take away our democracy. Although this election was fraudulent, we can't play into their hands. We love you, you're special. We've witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it's important to go home peacefully.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened and where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
Donald Trump Tells January 6 Protestors to “Go Home in Peace” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Trumps Speech at the Save America March in Washington DC Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what Mike Pence says or the Mockingbird Media tries to Amplify, Mike Pence did have the Constitutional Authority to Pause the Vote 2001 Al Gore<> 2021 Mike Pence The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2001 The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2021 In 2001, any congressman who wanted to raise an objection, the ECA of 1887 insists that he/she needs the signed support of one ONE Senator. In 2021, Congressman Paul Gosar, along with 60+ of his colleagues objected to the Electoral Count of Arizona. The objection was in writing & was signed by a senator. There were others. The (ECA) of 1887 was then REPLACED with the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 in a now successful attempt to change the VP’s role. Our elected/selected officials are guilty of treason. https://rumble.com/v35yusg-january-6-2001-2021-gore-pence-pence-could-have-sent-it-back.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the House of Representatives and the Senate was to certify the election results. Al Gore, in his dual role as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate, presided over the event that would officially anoint George W. Bush as the new President. If any congressman wanted to raise an objection, the rules insisted that he or she had to have the signed support of just 1 senator. Speaker 1: Mister president, it is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of many of the diverse constituents in our country, Especially those in the 9th congressional district and all American voters who recognize that the Supreme Court, not the people of the United States, decided this election. Speaker 2: Is the objection, signed by a senator? Speaker 1: Unfortunately, mister president, it is not signed by 1 single senator. Speaker 2: Are there any objections to counting the certificate of vote of the State of Arizona that the teller has verified appears to be regular, informed, and authentic? Speaker 3: Mister Vice President, I, Paul Gosar, from Arizona Speaker 2: What purpose does the gentleman from Arizona rise? Speaker 3: I rise both for myself and 60 of my colleagues to object To the, counting of the electoral ballots from Arizona. Speaker 2: Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator? Speaker 3: Yes, it is. Speaker 2: And I heard this week that president Trump said I had the right to overturned the election. President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election. The
January 6 - 2001 <> 2021 Gore <> Pence — Pence Could Have Sent it Back Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what the Mockingbird Media says…. No Police Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Merrick Garland LIED! Officer Brian Sicknick was said to be killed by a violent mob, hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. That was a lie! Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick suffered 2 strokes and died the day after January 6th, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled. The autopsy found no evidence of an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, external or internal injuries. Capitol Police officer Sicknick died of natural causes, 2 strokes due to a blood clot. The Four Other Officers oddly enough “committed suicide”, Some long after January 6. • Officer Kyle DeFreytag “Suicided” himself on July 10 • Officer Gunther Hashida “Suicided” himself at his home, found July 29. • Officer Howard Liebengood “suicided” himself on January 9 • Officer Jeffrey Smith “suicided” himself on January 15 https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fourth-police-officer-dies-by-suicide-after-capitol-riot-family-confirms This Video https://rumble.com/v2cb06e-january-6-merrick-garland-lied-no-officers-died-that-day.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Brian Sicknick's cause of death remains uncertain, despite media claims that he was beaten to death by Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Video evidence shows Sicknick walking through the building unharmed. However, the media and politicians like Liz Cheney continue to spread false information without correction or apology. The White House, including Press Secretary and Attorney General Merrick Garland, falsely claim that Sicknick and other officers were murdered during the riot. In reality, the other four officers mentioned died by suicide, with no evidence linking their deaths to the Republican mob. While some officers were assaulted, the claim that January 6th was the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War is unfounded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Cyknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol. The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay, they got caught. Here's the interesting thing. They won't admit it. Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized. Quote, Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight, he told us. Those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both The press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but That other officers were murdered too. It's it's almost beyond belief. Watch this. Speaker 1: The right range of bipartisan lawmakers, as you heard Yesterday, you guys reported on it, who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on cons on our constitution and the rule of law, Which cost police police, officers their lives. Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from 1 administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died. Speaker 0: Five officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy on Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man Whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you would go with integrity because it's essential. But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were, quote, killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you. No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie. But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides, we know for a fact, were the result of the Republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false. And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has Internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one. Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a100. The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. Don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value, and that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context. We said that On January 6, 2020, almost yet again, we're against that. But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War? That's insane. It's not even close.
Fourth police officer dies by suicide after Capitol riot, family confirms A fourth police officer who responded to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 has died by suicide, according to his family. fox5dc.com
January 6: Merrick Garland LIED! No Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

In hindsight, the deep state did one hell of a job and Pelosi was one hell of an actress. The power of the camera, when magnified, can depict any image one wants. That’s why it’s called Tell-A-Vision! Professional film crews, FBI & Aunt-Tifa to display & incite violence, her producer daughter was even there… I especially like the big ass X on the couch at the 3:09 mark, like it’s a marker for Nancy’s fat ass to sit. History will reflect January 6 as one of the greatest psyops ever performed on the American people…. Along with Covid. Follow me down the rabbit hole 🕳️ https://rumble.com/v2cky9w-january-6-pelosi-deserves-an-oscar-professional-film-crews.-find-the-x.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Capitol is under attack as people breach the doors and windows. Senators are in lockdown and putting on gas masks in preparation for a breach. They are requesting more security personnel and the National Guard has been called in. The concern for personal safety is high, with the blame placed on the president. There is a discussion about evacuating the Capitol and finding an alternative location to continue proceedings. It is mentioned that it may take days to clean up the damage. Official channels estimate that the situation will be resolved within an hour.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're still we're trying to get surrounded. They're taking the, north front scaffolding. We'll be in this. We'll get more ammunition. We're not gonna be able to hire them. The door has been breached, and people are gaining access into the capital. Speaker 1: We have got to get to finish the proceedings. Speaker 0: USA. USA. Speaker 2: Senator Schumer is at a secure location and they're locked down in the Senate. Speaker 1: There has to be some way we can maintain the Sense that people have that there is some security or some confidence That government can function and that we can elect the President of the United States. Did we go back into session? We did go back in succession. Speaker 2: But now apparently everybody on the floor is putting on to gas masks to prepare for a breach. I'm trying Speaker 1: to get more information, putting on their tear gas masks. Speaker 0: We need a area for the house members. They're all walking over now through the tunnel. Speaker 2: I'm gonna call up the effing secretary of DoD. We have some senators who are still in their hideaways that need massive personnel now. Can you Speaker 3: It's a Maryland National Guard to come to. Speaker 1: I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has other police department that's that your foreigner has mentioned. Hi, Governor. This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the Virginia National Guard. Mr. Hoyer was I was speaking to Governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the The federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction? Speaker 2: Thank you. Oh, my gosh. Speaker 1: They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States. Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. And If Speaker 0: you don't Speaker 1: mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you. Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in. Speaker 1: You're not just talking to governor Northam, And what he said is, they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard. They're breaking windows and going in, obviously, ransacking our offices and all the rest of that. That's nothing. The concern we have about personal harm. Personal safety is just Transcends everything, but the fact is on any given day, they're breaking the law in many different ways. And Quite frankly, much of it at the instigation of the president of the United States. And now, if if he could could at least, Somebody. Speaker 2: Yeah. Why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capital, mister attorney general, and your law enforcement responsibility, A public statement they should all leave. This cannot be just we're waiting for so and so. We need them there now, whoever you got. You have had you also have troops. This is steady hoyer. Speaker 1: Okay. So we have a to make that decision. Speaker 2: Andrews Air Force Base. Alright. Other military bases. Thank you. We need active duty, National Guard. How soon in the future can you have the place evacuated, the clothing cleaned out? Speaker 0: I I don't wanna speak for the leadership that's going to be responsible for in executing the Speaker 1: Or the hotel or some other entity that was under siege. And let me say you can logistically get people there. Imagine make the front. How we can get this job done today. You talked to Mitch about it earlier. He's not in the room right now, but he was with us earlier And said we want to expedite this and hope that they could confine to just 1 complaint, Arizona, and then we could vote and that would be, front. Then just move forward with the rest of the state. The overriding wish is to do it at the capital. What we are being told very directly is It's going to take days for the capital to be okay again. We've gotten a very bad report about the condition I would go to the house floor with defecation and all that kind of thing as well. I don't think that that's hard to clean up. But I do think it is more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building and how long will that take. I just got off the device president. Speaker 2: And I got off with the vice president elect. Okay. Speaker 1: But what we left the conversation with, because he said, I had the impression from Mitch that Mitch wants everybody back to do it there. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: I said, well, we're getting a counterpoint that It could take time to clean up the poo poo that they're making all over the room literally and figuratively in the capital and that but it may take days to get back. Speaker 0: And so I'm at the Capitol building. I'm literally standing with, the chief of of the US Capitol Police. Can you just inform me what you will hear through official channels? Paul Irving, your Sergeant and Arms will inform you that their best information is that they believe that, the New house and the senate will be able, to read the fee in roughly an hour. Speaker 2: Good news.
January 6: Pelosi Deserves an Oscar— Professional Film Crews. Find the X Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Even Nancy Pelosi’s daughter believes the J6 narrative was complete horseshit. 2:43 Pelosi: “The Shaman did noth(ing)… What did the Shaman do? He stood there.” 4:24 “After the Democrats lose the house, then they get rid of the committee, people may lose I think interest… no one is going to care after the democrats are out of power. And you take Biden out of office- then who cares!?” 4:47 “DC is a lot of people who work for the government. I don’t think they’re sympathetic. If you got it moved (changed trial jurisdiction from DC) you’d totally get off” (laughs while saying this) 6:48 “If there was an insurrection… you were supposed to have a plan!” “It was the sorriest insurrection in history” 8:09 “You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day” 14:50 Pelosi talks about her friendship with Gavin McInnes and laughs at the notion that Proud Boys are white supremacists. https://rumble.com/v29wdt4-bombshell-nancy-pelosis-daughter-caught-on-tape-refuting-the-j6-narrative.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their plans to attend an event and bring a camera. They talk about getting on a list and filling out a form for information. They mention a lawyer and question whether he got a good or bad deal. They discuss the possibility of an appeal and the potential for a longer sentence. They mention the shaman's sentence and criticize the disparity in sentencing. They talk about the upcoming trial and the potential for bias in the jury. They mention the difficulty of moving the trial and discuss a woman who got a DUI and caused a fatal accident. They mention receiving threats and the involvement of the FBI. They briefly mention their connection to Gavin McGinnis and the comical nature of the Proud Boys.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So how am I gonna get in? I need to know what we Speaker 1: Only will be Can you is there a Speaker 0: Oh, he needs to put you on the list. Yeah. But the problem is is that I wanna go with a camera. I will put you on the list. I will make some contacts, and I will try to camera? I'm thinking of maybe Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm the camera guy because I want to meet him too. Hey. I'm gonna need the camera guy. Speaker 0: You need to get information. They have copy of this? There's a form. There's a form you can fill. I'll get you the information. I'll get you the terms. Thank you. Speaker 2: You're welcome. Speaker 0: Now do you know anything about his, First of all, do you think that he's a, no. Do you think that he got good deal or bad deal? Speaker 1: I don't know. A I'm gonna Speaker 2: say He's the one who got The lawyer went away? Speaker 1: Yes. The lawyers. Alright. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me tell you what happened. He okay. His lawyer, Patrick got it. Right? So he was in reserves. Old guy. Old guy. He is a lawyer, but he's also in the reserves. Speaker 2: Right. Right. Speaker 0: And he also is very very religious. So what he does when you come in, let's say you're the client. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: The first thing he does Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And blah blah blah. All that. So then, he says you have to do god wants you to make right. You go right to the judge, tell him you did everything, thing? And just and and just face the music, period. So he did that, but then he got a new lawyer who I have not talked to because I'm not sure I trust the new lawyer. Because, first of all, he's he gets out May 18th. Is the lawyer gonna be able to get Before then? I mean, it's already January. February. Conviction. Yeah. Was there anyone a conviction? Yeah. Speaker 2: But you know, you could appeal it. Like, I mean, then it comments, like, you're not gonna make the felon? You could still you still have status to appeal. You Speaker 0: can give an appeal. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. You win the appeal overturning. So he gets some incentive. Yeah. Like Speaker 0: So some days, did the shaman do? He stood there. What Speaker 2: I told Speaker 0: him, he stood there. The shaman got how many months? Speaker 2: Right. 41. Speaker 0: Book to get bigger? Like, people are criticizing some of Speaker 2: the people Speaker 0: that Right. Right. A lot of people were getting probation and stuff. So I think they're looking to make People like, I think if Paul went now, he'd get a bigger a longer sentence. Speaker 2: What what did he do? Okay. What did he do? He went He Speaker 0: just walked me with the trunk flag in the sand? Speaker 2: That's it. That's it. Speaker 0: That's it. I need that. So I don't know if the balance was was good or bad. Speaker 1: Well, for the charge I'm looking from a charging point of view of 15.12. Speaker 0: See, you didn't walk into that. You walk me into the settings. Speaker 1: But I didn't do event? Speaker 0: I know. That's what I'm saying. That's the bad thing. Speaker 1: I wasn't even there to say it. A lot of these people are like, we're here to overturn the I wasn't even there for that reason. I was not there to overturn anything. Speaker 2: I I think a thing about it? He used him to to shore up their 15 12 charge too. Because if they have people fleeing to it, they're telling the judge is good. We already have people who pledge this felony. So though? If you overturn it for 1 case, you're gonna overturn all the prior conditions. It puts more pressure on these district judges not to over return in? Because he's, oh, we have Paul. He's gonna plead guilty to the 15/12. But they dropped everything but the 15/12. The charge they never used before. A so they're like, oh, this guy will take 8 months. And we'll we'll have another plea. They make every single person charged with the 15/12, plead a difference between 12? I was thinking to drop it. Speaker 0: I'm very Speaker 1: interested on the 1st Speaker 0: trial, how Speaker 1: that's gonna look like. Well, I think Speaker 0: the one thing, if you drag it out, chance? It's like anniversary. The first one is a big deal. They're gonna really be a big deal in your state. No one's gonna care after the Democrats are a power. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm gonna do that. Speaker 1: The jury that's Speaker 0: The jury is The jury is Speaker 2: We we need to see how there. Well, if Speaker 0: you guys wanted to totally shut off. I I wish you push at all? I'm waiting for them to successfully move it? Speaker 2: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard the hearings. Speaker 1: The logos deleted me. Speaker 2: Those if they're gonna say They're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. And then it is very the last time the government move to trial with the Oklahoma City bomber? They agreed to move into Colorado. So that's a stipulated. Even the Boston bomber case, which just now an appeal to Boston the city of Boston or the federal judge here? What do you mean it can't be fair? Motion gets signed by the judge They say yes. Yes. Speaker 1: But then but but Speaker 2: there might be more favorable up the line? You know, we go to the I'm not using DC Circuit of Appeals to the Supreme Court. They might say, wait a second. You're you have politicians Speaker 0: every night comparing it to Pearl Harbor. 9/11. That was just deep. Speaker 2: Looking at the variant to Pearl Harbor 911 And that was just deep Deeps are under siege. Had natural budget for 7 months. If you live there, you're like, I am under siege. I see natural guardsmen around here? You know, my my city was attacked. The local the local media everyday. You can't have a fair trial. Speaker 0: Well, the reason see, I think gonna remember January 6th. Right now, people are still looking for stupid. We need stuff to fill. I mean, if you watch 6.47. As time goes on Right. It's gonna be less. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: And as as as So I think I think also people are gonna lose their their office the jobs. The people that were there for Lucerne Johnson, it's not gonna need anything if you weren't even there. I know we Speaker 2: need, like, a word breakout. Speaker 0: No. No. It's right at all. Okay. I I I thank you for your time. Listen, I really, Speaker 2: typical bad guy? Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that if there was If there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line, Martin. You're in the military. You know? Right? Speaker 1: No. It doesn't. Speaker 0: There was no plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. So you're offering a you sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright? You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that. Speaker 2: He's doing the impression. He's a sorry in his direction in in the 20 21st century ever. It's no guns. Speaker 1: A guy's playing. A guy's fucking behind you on Speaker 0: I love the guy. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm like I'm like Speaker 0: Well, we do that. We could just do it after last week for the guy that just was ringing Speaker 1: Well, my favorite my favorite guy holding Speaker 0: Mister Webb? Speaker 1: He got no. Speaker 0: He he he got it. Speaker 2: He's dead. He's dead. Speaker 1: I'll wait for a sentence. He's right. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, what's he gonna get? Speaker 2: Probably in a few months. I don't know. I'm not sure right now. We'll just go, you know, from this You're Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one Then I would just wait. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because I wouldn't the 1st child, like, this I was in Ohio with this guy who is going to file? He wants to subpoena Trump and make it, like, this whole it's for, like I Speaker 1: heard it. No. Speaker 0: They're not gonna they're not gonna It's gonna be You're not Speaker 2: gonna allow that. You're not gonna name? Is the district Speaker 1: judge I just want a subpoena people involved with my team. For example, that officer that I gave water, the guy that interviewed me Probably, maybe 1 more person. But other than that, I want people You Speaker 2: can find him, officer Lopez? Speaker 0: Yeah. Let's find him. Speaker 2: You should find him. I mean, he's If Speaker 0: you have the name, you can find him. Speaker 2: Officer little bit? We we found some stuff on. He's from, like, Speaker 1: Coachella? California? California? Speaker 0: From the place of concert center? Yeah. Yeah. That's I'll find it for you. Speaker 2: Yeah. That's Somebody told me, like, oh, he's Coachella guy. And I was like, is he the constant? Like, no. He's from the city. Oh. Oh. Oh. He has a catalog? He has a different Local Coachella News did a thing about bit about it? Because he got some award or something to be in capital at in the capital police in that day. But he's the one in the video where he's offering him water. And he looks shell shop? Yeah. That's why I was trying to he did Look. Speaker 0: I look for him. I look for him. Speaker 1: I did a comment, so I know that being his buddy's trying to talk to me. He's like Yeah. Speaker 0: Clipped since all we're like and, can I tell you that story? Yeah. So her condition was she took home in front of her wall the Nancy Pelosi office of the speaker sign. Oh, yeah. So she was one of the people I wanted to get to really early because know that that if I went to something like that and I took something long from my wall, I know that it It's a memento and not a step. Right. Right. Right. I knew. She's 21 years old. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: Right. This is not Right. What they're making it seem. Speaker 2: Right. Mhmm. Speaker 0: So I had lunch with her at her country club. And I was like, so what were you doing there? She's like this. Well, like, I think I went from Missouri before. Barely finished this, like, farm Right. Works on a farm. So what do you do for a lover from a family farm? I was like, and they're turning her like, public enemy number 1. And she's the most, like, almost almost you must feel sad that she's so Luckily, she has the lawyer, and the lawyer got it down. I mean, they walked to her bedroom and this whole thing on the wall. Right? So you think, oh, she's gonna go down. Got a misdemeanor. Nothing nothing nothing. And we're walking to get probation. But on the night of the anniversary of January 6th, She's drunk in a bar. Speaker 1: She got a DUI? Speaker 0: And got killed a mother. Speaker 2: Oh, she killed them. That's right. Speaker 0: And it's clear. Mistake? And now I'm just because I know her. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: What happened was when the local news starts to your guys in the army. Yeah. They they took shit. And she's like a 21 year old farm girl. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So she I mean, it wasn't really her her nature, I think, to meet her. Anyway, way was treated her way to whisper the matter in the country club. She's got Speaker 2: You got DUI mask on. Speaker 0: Charged her yet because they haven't got in touch with college or Speaker 1: with sports medicine. Uh-huh. Speaker 0: And I was with her Monday, and she said, I don't even remember any of it. And then She got she herself got, Like, like, blacked out. She was blacked out the whole time. Doesn't remember any of it. Speaker 1: And who who did she kill? Speaker 0: Or The mother. She killed them. Her unknown problem, honey. Speaker 2: She rode against traffic Speaker 0: for 6 miles. 6 miles at 60 miles an hour. And she She doesn't remember anything. Into a Speaker 2: car and this woman who was sitting next to her husband who drove husband in the hospital right diet? Speaker 1: I I heard a bug on a lie later. No. Speaker 0: But that's an example of, like, chance If you go deep, if you're really a deep it's like that's an example of, like, the kind of damage that I need. You can say, oh, we need this and shoot me fairly and they're full of shit. That's fine. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But, like, it's not ruining your life. This has ruined her life. Mhmm. And Junior 6 was like a blip. Oh, no. But there's attention from it. Right. Right. It's free Speaker 1: traffic. Yeah. Speaker 0: They're cool. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because it takes a lot of time too? Speaker 1: No. But it not I don't mean just the the words itself, but when you have people implement I have people calling from I have nothing to do with my business. They're stealing bad reviews on my website saying, oh, it's erection disorder. I had my secretary that's scared of going to work because she's saying Wait. Speaker 2: Hold on, hon. It's not a bad need Speaker 0: to have so I can move Speaker 2: my life or Well, you got the powder too. I got it. Speaker 1: I had maybe what's on? Like, like, the anthrax. Speaker 2: I think, yeah, we had to call out the the cops, the ups Speaker 0: the Why do people why it could be it was so weird. Speaker 2: People are so weird. And it tested positive. The first test And so And they said that somebody who knows what they're doing made sure that the the first test, it'll test positive, like a like a field test. It'll pass that until they do the actual chemical. A like, it was very premeditated. It and have, like, a letter, like, to a oh, probably I didn't get Speaker 1: a watch down and pass message. Speaker 2: In reference the the beep? Oh, no. You're thinking too loudly now. How do you like this? Speaker 1: I opened the letter. I went to work. I thought it was a pump bill or something. And when I opened my diaper, I just went like that. White powder came out. I was thinking already. Alright. Anthrax or something like that. Who knows? Crazy people. Speaker 2: And the FBI guy shows up and they're and they were they were more like it's almost like they were more interested in searching his office. You know, we were like, we didn't even trust them because they were like using it like, oh, who is he? And then we had to get the postal inspector out there to try and, like, who it was like a jurisdictional thing. Yeah. Speaker 1: It was Speaker 2: it was a mess. Speaker 1: Yeah. My employees I have about a Twenty employees. They're worried. Speaker 0: Don't you just an outstanding member of society? Okay. Do they talk about that in the court? No. Of course a That's interesting. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, no. Speaker 2: I've heard nothing wrong with that. At the trial, they will. At the trial, yeah. Status hearings is Speaker 1: very Yeah. But they're gonna probably gonna call me by supremacists. As a matter of fact, I I want it in Spanish. That was my first language. Speaker 2: So That would be fine. Speaker 1: I wanna interpreter for my next question? Speaker 0: Okay. So I want you to know that I'm from New York City, and I am was always a long time real friends with Gavin McGinnis, who supposedly got it started Speaker 2: with Brad Boys. Yes. Speaker 0: And he when you say this is a drinking club, I'm just telling you guys, I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know who Gavin is. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, time? This is, like, years ago, they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. 16. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may take he may touch it, but so that's why it's funny to me. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, we'll sit around the table or call each other. Hey. Where do you wanna meet up? Can you figure out where to go eat? And it's like No. Speaker 0: I know I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, and I was just like so I just want you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people. I'm like,
BOMBSHELL! Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Caught on Tape REFUTING the J6 Narrative! NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi’s Filmmaker Daughter Alexandra Pelosi Caught on Tape REFUTING J6 NARRATIVE – Admitting Jan. 6 Protests Not an Insurrection, DC Courts Too Biased Read the breakdow rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The J6 Committee lied about what happened as tapes were eventually released by Tucker Carlson. This tape overturns the single most powerful political lie democrats have used regarding J6. It gets even better… The J6 committee KNEW Brian Sitnick was alive and well after he was supposedly “murdered” by Trump supporters. The investigators working on behalf of the J6 committee saw this footage & electronically bookmarked the this tape, but it never saw the light of day… until Tucker Carlson. https://rumble.com/v2c0y5c-january-6-new-video-shatters-narrative-on-police-officer-brian-sitnick-deat.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, but the video evidence shows otherwise. While some violence occurred, the majority of the chaos was peaceful. The media falsely reported that Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob, but surveillance footage shows him walking in the Capitol unharmed. This contradicts the narrative that he was murdered by Trump supporters. The January 6th committee had access to this footage but chose not to release it, as it would undermine their political agenda. The truth about what happened that day is being concealed for political gain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection, not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician, but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated, a deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves it was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Here it is. Dis January 6th, when an estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers. Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th. The mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Diss Police officers died. Speaker 0: Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers. By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand, into a single emotionally related political slogan, which they repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th, they said, was a deadly insurrection. There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up. He incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 2: The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months just Go. It was about white supremacy in my view. Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized were violent. Surveillance video from inside the Capitol shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it. To prove the insurrection was deadly, just began disappointed to the death of an officer called Brian Sicknick. The mob killed officer Brian Sicknick. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years. They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Cichnek died after being hit in the head with a fire distinguish her during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie, untrue in any way. But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it. Speaker 1: The New York Times has dis Quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick. Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump disorder, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the left. His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of the politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Breaking down the doors, trying to overturn an outcome of election, And killing several police officers in the meantime. Speaker 0: But Brian Cygnik should not be reduced to a prop for the political ambitions of the Democratic Party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter, including how he died. To this day, media accounts describe Sicknick as someone who was, quote, slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie. Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capital after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances, Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie the Democrats have told us about January 6th, dis and it was indeed a lie. The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through just after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters, and they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage which contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party he reviewed this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth disturb their political interests. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do
January 6: New Video Shatters Narrative on how Police Officer Brian Sickick Died! The J6 Committee KNEW & Ignored it! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The best person to talk to on law enforcement side would be the Capitol Police Chief… but for some reason he was silenced… Fox News Deleted this Scene from Tucker Carlson’s Interview with the Capitol Police Chief “Leaks” Saying, “It was a Cover Up!” Why would Fox News delete this scene? “If people were reporting to intelligence correctly. If I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn’t be here. Then seeing how, you’re lambasted in public & everything appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…” https://rumble.com/v34749c-january-6-fox-news-deletes-capitol-police-chief-saying-it-was-a-cover-up.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration at not being allowed to testify at a Senate hearing and believes that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the events of January 6th could have been prevented. They question whether there was a deliberate attempt to hide intelligence and suggest that it may have been part of a larger plan. The speaker also discusses how the events have benefited the Democratic Party but believes it is a violation of the constitution. They emphasize the importance of a fair legal system and express concern that it is no longer perceived as such.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very restrained and rational and not give a statement, obviously, but the facts that you're describing are shocking. Speaker 1: The reason why I've had a lot of people ask me, you know, why did you write this book? I try to do what I can to get the truth out. Yes. You know, they didn't want me to testify in, in February February 23rd at the senate hearing. They don't want people that's still In positions, I actually had to go in and talk to a friend of mine on one of the oversight committees say, I will come there in person. I want to be there. I want to testify. So I'm glad you think I'm reserved. I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed off, because If if people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I got a significant experience. I was allowed to do my job as chief, We wouldn't be here today. This didn't happen. Then see how, you know, you're out there, you're land based in public, and it's all you know, everything Appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence that it had, military had, it's all watered down. I'm not getting intelligence. I'm denied support National Guard in advance. I'm denied National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes. You're in a fight? Yeah. A fight for a couple of minutes. Speaker 0: Yeah. 1 you out. 1 minute. Speaker 1: I was gonna say, 60 seconds, 3 minutes. Hey. Let me tell you. It wears you out. My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the the protesters Wait. Speaker 0: Can I say so you describe this as a failure to get the intelligence people who needed it? But it sounds like worse than it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence. Speaker 1: And that's what I'm getting at is Could there possibly be that actually did something happen and kinda wanted something happen? It doesn't it's not a far stretch to begin. Speaker 0: I don't know what the other explanation is. Speaker 1: It's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out. It gets concerning what was our end goal. You look at look at what's happening. Was that their end goal? I don't know. Speaker 0: Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th as really helped the Democratic Party. It's bravely politicized the U. S. Military And the intelligence agencies and the FBI, and those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of The constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party. That's the fact. Like, that's what happened. Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I I write about that because As a cop of 30 years, I'm I'm a rule of law type of guy. Yeah. You know, there's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold. As soon as you cut that blindfold off, the fairness of our legal system goes out goes out the window. And that is exactly what has happened. They have stripped up blindfold away from Lady Justice, And there no. It's not perceived as being fair anymore.
January 6 - Fox News Deletes Capitol Police Chief Saying it was a Cover Up in Tucker Carlson Interview Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

After Tucker Carlson was Freed from Fox… he interviewed, then Capitol Police Chief, Steve Sund again… this time no filters. Four Clips. Four Breakdowns. Intelligence Failures, They Knew, Pelosi & McConnell were in On It. Nancy Pelosi Withheld the National Guard CLIP 1 January 6 - Former Capital Police Chief Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From FBI Steve D’Antuono, Chris Miller & General Milley A senate report talks about multiple emails that were circulating just days prior to January 6, talking about the violence they were anticipating at the Capital. Steve Sund had a video call with FBI Steve D’Antuono prior to J6 and there were no mentions of violence. Here’s where it gets weird… The then Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller, along with General Milley both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC, because “they were worried about violence” & revoking permits on Capital Hill. “You know who issues the permits on Capital Hill for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn’t told? Me.” On January 4th, Chris Miller puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, although internally they were expecting violence. 🤔 This action also affected the National Guard of Virginia & Maryland from being allowed to respond at first. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36droa-january-6-steve-sund-wasnt-told-about-key-intelligence-over-concerns-of-vio.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Steve Sund- General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, Kept it from the Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress An investigative reporter from The Washington Post discovered General Milley was using an intelligence platform called DataMinr to come across intelligence on his own. “He’s picking up intelligence talking about killing members of Congress & attacking the Capital, and he’s not telling me. He’s telling select members of Congress That’s concerning as hell!” This Clip https://rumble.com/v36dyu3-january-6-steve-sund-general-milley-had-intelligence-of-violence-and-murder.html CLIP 3 January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on it! They Denied Capital Police Chief Steve Sund with Federal Assistance TWICE Tucker: This was handled very difference— by whom? Steve Sund: 1. By the intelligence agencies 2. By the Military “Congress passed a law that requires me to go the Sergeant of Arms (Capital Police Board) in advance of an event to request Federal Resources such as the National Guard. I was denied Twice, by the Sargent of Arms Paul D. Irving & Sargent of Arms Michael Conrad Stenger who BOTH resigned January 7, 2021.” WHO DO THEY WORK FOR? Nancy Pelosi on the House Side. Mitch McConnel on the Senate Side. Notice Tucker was fishing for just this answer. BOOM! This Video https://rumble.com/v36e4ue-january-6-nancy-pelosi-and-mitch-mcconnell-denied-steve-sund-federal-assist.html CLIP 4 January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard “I’m the only Chief of Police that in the United States that has a law to bring in the National Guard” 12:58pm “I make my first call to the Sargent of Arms Paul Irving, requesting a Declaration of Emergency & bring in the military & Federal resources.” Paul Irving Responds: “I’ll run it up the Chain, I’ll get back to you.” —> Nancy Pelosi Paul Irving “didn’t have to run it up the chain (Pelosi) because it was an emergency, but he wouldn’t grant authorization. “My next call was over to Mike Stenger. Mike Stenger Responded: What did Paul tell you? Let’s wait to hear from Paul. 71 minutes go by & I make 32 calls. 71<>17 “The first people to offer assistance was the United States Secret Service. By law, I shouldn’t have requested their assistance until I had approval. But I’m looking at my men & women having their added handed to them, and my first thought was F*ck it! I will take whatever discipline there is.” That’s the one text the Secret Service turned over after they “lost all their texts” 🤔 2:09pm 71 minutes later, Steve Sund is finally given approval for the National Guard This Clip https://rumble.com/v36ec9w-january-6-71-minutes-to-get-federal-assistance.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Steve D'Antwono, the FBI director, received multiple emails warning about the violence expected at the Capitol before January 6th, but nothing was mentioned during a video call with him. The military had discussed locking down Washington DC and revoking permits on Capitol Hill due to concerns about violence. However, on January 4th, the acting secretary of defense issued a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or equipment for crowd control. This decision hindered the National Guard's response when assistance was desperately needed on January 6th. Governor Hogan even pleaded for help but was denied due to the memo. The situation doesn't make sense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI director, you look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. It's a GAO report or maybe no, it's a Senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antwonio on Sunday, Monday and some probably Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday and nothing said about it. I mean, that's not a word, not a word. Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that does not make sense. Speaker 0: It doesn't. It doesn't. Especially when you think about think about this, the military, the United States military, and this gets really convoluted once you get into the bonds on January 6 and how I was delayed getting resources. You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller enacting and, General Milley had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn't told? Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller deal. He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense. Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. So The military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we are considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't adopt an aggressive posture. Speaker 0: Right. Right. They're deploying because they're going to be deploying National regard to assist in Washington DC with crowd control at metros and some of the traffic, control areas. But they put this out on January 4th, specific to January 5th 6th, and this direction affected the National Guard in Virginia and Maryland. When I was calling begging for assistance on January 6th, they weren't allowed to respond at first. Look at, governor Hogan. He did a press conference saying he was begging to respond and he was not being denied by the Pentagon, all because of the memo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley, the military's top officer, has been accused of using an intelligence platform called Data Miner to uncover information about potential threats to the United States Capitol and members of Congress. However, he allegedly failed to inform everyone who should have been notified, including the speaker. This raises concerns about the duty to warn and the need for necessary action to be taken. The details were revealed by investigative reporter Carol Leonning in her book.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Begging to respond and who is not being denied by the Pentagon all because of the memo. So why? You begin to wonder why and especially when you look at things like something that I recently came across, when you talk about the military. General Milley, we're now finding out, and it's not for me, this is from Carol Leonning, investigative reporter with The Washington Post, Has found that he was using Data Miner on his own coming across intelligence Tell us what Data Miner is. So Data Miner is an intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would have on their A computer. I I guess it goes in and does crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works. Yes. But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform. He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States Capitol, and he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Wenning writes about it in her book. That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the handling of the event was different from previous situations. They mention that the decision was made by the intelligence agency and the military. According to a federal law, the speaker was required to request federal resources like the National Guard in advance from the Capitol Police Board. However, they were denied twice due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The decision was made by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big picture, just to restate, you've seen many things like this. And as you just said, this was very different. This was handled very differently. By whom? Speaker 1: By by the intelligence. I'd say 1 by the intelligence agency, 2 by the military. So the reason why I say the military, think of this, By federal law. You know, congress passed a law that that requires me to go to the 2 to the Sergeant Arms Capitol Police Board In advance of an event and to request, federal resources such as the National Guard. So congress passed a law. It's 2 US code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th? That requires me to go and get approval For bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance, I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice Because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that. Speaker 0: May I ask you who made that decision? Who denied you? Speaker 1: I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. And who do they On January 3rd Speaker 0: Who do they work for? Speaker 1: It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was the number one boss And then McConnell on the Senate side.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, who is the chief of police, expresses frustration over the law that prevents them from bringing in the national guard without approval. They recount the events of the attack on the Capitol and their efforts to request assistance. They made multiple calls to different agencies, including the sergeant in arms and the chairman of the Capitol Police Board, but authorization was delayed for 71 minutes. Finally, at 2:09, they received approval and immediately informed their colleague. The speaker emphasizes their anger and marks the time as 2:10 when they finally got approval for the National Guard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national guard, a law. So that's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the national guard to be brought in. I have 340 national guard that have been activated. At least a 150 to a 180 of are in the city, many of them within eyesight of the capital. Okay? We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank god I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him and said, hey. Please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front and they started attacking, it was gonna be bad. 12/58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources. I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you. Speaker 1: The chain is Pelosi. Speaker 0: The chain is his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stenger. He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed to us on the left front. I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul tell you? Said he's run up the chain. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center. I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people to offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval, but I'm looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them. And and my first thought was fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the 1 tech secret service turned over. You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their, chief chief Sullivan and myself. Thank god for him. Speaker 1: I don't so can we just so you make this call immediately Immediately. To the house sergeant in arms who reports mister Irving who reports to Nancy Pelosi. He says I'll call Pelosi. Speaker 0: He says I'm a run it up the chain. Speaker 1: Run it up the chain, but that is the chain. Speaker 0: Not here. Not here. I got you. I'm just I wanna tell you exactly what Speaker 1: you mean. What happens then? Does he get back to you? Speaker 0: So for the next 71 minutes, I make the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from from 2001. They have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call, and the next several minutes going, where are we on the approval? Where are we in the approval? Just any minute now. Any minute I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that. 71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stenger, said we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander, I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 2/10. I finally got approval for the National Guard. I was that mad
January 6 - Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From Chris Miller & General Miller Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, But Didn’t Share it with The Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on It! Denied Steve Sund Federal Assistance Twice Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Four More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They don’t want to get to the bottom of J6 • They Did Not Want The Capitol Police Chief to Testify • Nancy Pelosi was Off Limits & wasn’t allowed to be investigated • The Pentagon Call & the Set Up CLIP 1 When the Former Capital Police Chief who was there on January 6 says “it doesn’t seem like people want to get to the bottom of J6” That alone says everything. https://rumble.com/v36eiub-january-6-steve-sund-it-doesnt-seem-like-people-want-to-get-to-the-bottom-o.html CLIP 2 January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify “I fought to testify, they didn’t want me to testify in the Senate Hearing. When they first put out the notice, it was for only current employees that were still in place. - This would exclude Paul Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi. - It would have excluded Mike Stenger, who reports to Mitch McConnell. It would have excluded, Steve Sund, the Capital Police Chief. ….All The key people at the top of the security apparatus who would know the answers to the key questions. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36emna-january-6-they-didnt-want-the-chief-of-capital-police-to-testify-in-the-j6-.html CLIP 3 Oh Snaps 👀 January 6 - Democrat Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was “OFF LIMITS” for any Inquiry into January 6 “When they were talking about the the January 6 Committee coming out, I think it was Representative Bennie Thompson that said, Speaker Pelosi was OFF LIMITS… So they wouldn’t get any of her records, her phone records, and any inquiries into January 6.” OH BOY! I hope to God Trump uses his Subpoena Power on that evil WITCH! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36etwx-january-6-bennie-thompson-said-nancy-pelosi-was-off-limits-for-inquiry-into.html CLIP 4 January 6 - Steve Sund - The Pentagon Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - Tucker “It Sounds like a Set-Up!” Verrry Interesting… 2:34pm “I get a notification to get on a call with the US Pentagon. I have to sell my request for the National Guard. I’m on the call with a Lieutenant [Walter] Piatt, and General [Charles] Flynn… and it was mainly General Piatt that I’m speaking with. **I’m assuming it’s Charles Flynn given I don’t know any other active General with the name Flynn. Interesting he’s on this call. 🤔 Piatt’s Response: “I don’t like the optics of the National Guard on Capital Hill.” “While I’m begging for assistance, The Pentagon sent in resources to guard General’s houses to protect their homes & not the [US Capital]. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I can see where somebody can begin to go down that rabbit hole.” 🕳️.. . … 🐇 All people & agencies involved all came to the same conclusion that they were not going to protect the US Capital. This Video https://rumble.com/v36fd1n-january-6-steve-sund-call-with-walter-piatt-and-general-flynn-it-sounds-lik.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expressed confusion about the lack of answers regarding two significant events on January 6. Firstly, other federal agencies withheld crucial information from the speaker, who was in charge of security at the Capitol. Secondly, despite the situation escalating for 71 minutes, Speaker Pelosi denied permission to bring in the National Guard. The speaker questioned why there is a lack of investigation into these matters, suggesting a lack of interest in uncovering the truth. The situation is described as worsening beyond these events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't understand. So we I don't they were only 10 minutes into this, and you've told me 2 things. 1, the other federal agencies withheld critical information from you in charge of security at the capital before January 6. And once it started and things got out of control for 71 minutes, Pelosi refused to allow you to bring in the National Guard. So those are just those are 2 of the biggest questions from January 6. And my question is, why don't we have answers to why that happened? It doesn't seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it. It really it really doesn't. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks why Paul Irving, who had the authority, didn't give the okay. Speaker 1 explains that he testified at the Senate hearing in 2021 and disagreed with Speaker 1's recollection. Speaker 1 turned over his phone records and fought to testify. Speaker 0 questions why Speaker 1 wasn't allowed to testify since he was the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1 explains that initially, the hearing was only for current employees, excluding the top 3 people in security. Speaker 1 called someone on the rules committee to request testifying and promised to show up in person. Speaker 0 highlights the denial of Speaker 1's request for national guardsmen, which was a pivotal moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Paul Irving, the guy who had, you're saying, the statutory authority to to give that okay to, Has he ever explained why he didn't? Speaker 1: Oh, his they had him, and he testified at the Senate hearing in 2001. In 2021? I'm sorry. 2021. My apologies. Thank you for catching. And a couple of times, he he, disagreed with my recollection. I can tell you my phone records. I turned them over immediately. I fought to testify. They didn't want me to testify in the Senate hearing. I fought to testify. Speaker 0: Why wouldn't there's no share. Why who didn't want you to testify? You were the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1: You and me are on lockstep with this. And my story hasn't changed in two and a half years. So when they first put out the notice, when they were talking about having the hearing, it was only for current employees that were still in place. No long no one that was no longer in place in their position in security. So think about that. Initially, when they put up the request to have the and they put up the they were talking about having the hearing, it would have excluded Paul Irving, would have excluded Mike Stinger, and it would have excluded me. Only 3 people, the 3 people at the top of the security apparatus. So the Speaker 0: Democrats, I think. Speaker 1: Well, it was joint. It was a combined joint. I hear you. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. Of course. The unit party intentionally excluded the 3 people who would know the answers to the key questions. Speaker 1: Yeah, the original plan was to exclude them. I immediately called somebody I knew on the rules committee And said, please let me testify. I will be there in person. And I still remember, she said, you'll show up in person. I said, I promise you, I will be there in person. I want to testify. And I was the only one that showed up in person. Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it. That's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th remains a pivotal moment. The person responsible for that decision is known, but the reason behind it is still unknown. There has been no answer to that question. Additionally, Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits and her records would not be obtained by the J6 committee. However, she was in charge of the House that day. It is important to uncover the truth and understand what truly happened. Otherwise, it seems absurd, like a scene from a play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help, that is that's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name of the man who made that decision. And we still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question? Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question Specifically, that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six, committee coming out, I think it was, representative Bennie Thompson that had said Speaker Pelosi is off limits, so they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you Speaker 0: mean she's off limits? Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that that her coming into this was she was off limits to the inquiries to the Jane years. Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day. Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. That I mean, if Speaker 0: we're truly trying to get Speaker 1: to the bottom of this, to find out what happened. Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, that's insane.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urgently called General Walker to request the National Guard's assistance at the Capitol. Despite the imminent danger, the speaker faced resistance from higher-ups who didn't like the optics of the National Guard's presence. The speaker pleaded for help, but was denied multiple times. Eventually, shots were fired, and the speaker had to hang up to handle the situation. The National Guard didn't arrive until 6 PM, and instead of being deployed at the Capitol, they were driven back to the DC Army. The speaker felt betrayed and questioned if there was a conspiracy against protecting the Capitol. The systematic denial of intelligence and support from various agencies led to the baffling conclusion of not protecting the capital.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Called general Walker at 151. I was like, I can't wait any freaking longer. I call him. I said, send me the National Guard as quick as you can. I'm gonna get approval any minute because he asked, so you have approval from the Capitol Police Board? And I said I'll have approval any minute. Please just get them coming this way. So they're within eyesight. Shortly after 209, I talked to them. 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon. I have to sell my request to the National Guard. Along the call with a lieutenant general Piat Piat, trying to make sure I have his name pronounced right, and a, general Flynn is on the call. Ever and it's mainly a pilot that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti is on the call, And I said, I need the National Guard immediately. This is an urgent, urgent situation. I still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. Ever I need the National Guard immediately. You know what his response is? Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Ever like, he goes, I would rather have your officers in the fight, and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option. All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard. You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death. I need assistance immediately. Ever. And I still remember he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying him. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Have and he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather back to all your people. I said, sure, I don't have that option. Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does. It gets better. Speaker 0: So ever I beg and beg, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Have, right then, I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Dabbit. And I said, we have shots fired. I still remember yelling over the phone. We have shots fired on the USAI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta start making a notification. Gotta call the sergeant army saying, hey. We got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting. Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? Have a 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to a 180 that are within eyesight of the capital? You know what they do with them? They put them in vehicles, drive them around the Capitol back to the DC Army. You know where the DC Army is. It's far away. Yeah. Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equidistant on the other RFK Stadium. Yeah. Via RFK Stadium. They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening trips. Not real. Can you freaking believe it? No. That's real. That's real. And you know what else I do? While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to general's houses to protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not, you know, a conspiracy theorist, but But I could see where people begin to go down that rabbit hole real quick. Speaker 1: That rabbit hole. I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic denial of intelligence And then of support, defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the same have a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
January 6 - Steve Sund - It Doesn’t Seem Like People want to Get to the Bottom of It Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify in the J6 Committee Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was told by Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was OFF LIMITS for Inquiry into January 6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - It Sounds like a Set-Up! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Three More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They didn’t tell the Capitol Police Chief Antifa was in the crowds • Nancy Pelosi’s Operative, Yogananda Pittman • The White House Attack Compared to the January 6 Attack- They Didn’t Protect the White House CLIP 1 January 6 - The Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Tucker: Original reports were there were no agents in the crowd. We’ve learned there were in fact a lot of agents in the crowd. DID YOU KNOW? Steve Sund: No!… Shortly after January 6…> and I get a call from overseas & it was Great Britain Press, asking me about Feds in the crowd… I was like no, I would have been told, I’ve got lots of friends with the bureau, they all have my cell phone number, they would have told me..“ Your “friends” didn’t tell you Steve. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36k6if-january-6-the-capital-police-chief-was-not-informed-there-were-federal-agen.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative who was Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” 👀 “The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the Capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on National TV, blames leadership at the top, calls for my resignation & then lies about me. The very next day, Yogananda Pittman, is placed as Acting Chief. Yogananda Pittman was the head of intelligence for the Capital Police, thus she would have been responsible for an “intelligence failure”. She ended up getting a vote of NO CONFIDENCE from the Police Officers, and ended up being rewarded with the position as Chief of Police for the University of California Berkeley, which is right across from Nancy Pelosi’s district. How much does a Chief of Police make in Berkeley, CA? The average Chief of Police salary in Berkeley, CA is $143,200 as of July 25, 2023. The Chief of Police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position & he said Pittman was given some type of a “Secret Leave” so that she could leave & start her job on February 1st at Berkeley and not retire from the Capital Police four months later.” This Video https://rumble.com/v36l29u-january-6-yogananda-pittman-nancy-pelosis-operative-rewarded-with-a-cushy-j.html CLIP 3 January 6 - DC Police were Prevented from Protecting the White House & More Officers were Injured During that Attack then there were on January 6 - Charges Dropped against ALL those who Attacked the White House “The agency formed by Congress specifically for the US President, the Washington DC Police Department, when the White House was under attack and they are prevented from going on White House grounds to help the Secret Service to defend the White House!” 🤯 More officers were also injured in the Attack on the White House than there were at January 6. “I’m told by Park Police that all charges were dropped!” On those who attacked the White House. TREASON! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36lteo-january-6-steve-sund-the-white-house-under-attack-was-not-stopped-and-more-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a debate about the presence of federal agents at the January 6 event. Initially, it was denied, but now it is confirmed that there were indeed federal agents in the crowd. It is not uncommon for federal agencies to have people in plain clothes for situational awareness at large events like demonstrations and inaugurations. The FBI took overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6 event. A GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 18 or 19 domestic terrorists planning to attend the event. It is concerning that this information was not shared with intelligence. It is important to deconflict and communicate with the Chief of Capitol Police to avoid any confusion or conflicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the aftermath of January 6, there's been a huge debate over to what extent, you know, there were federal agents or people who are working in some way for federal agencies in the crowd. And the initial explanation was, well, none, and you're insane if you think that you're Alex Jones, you're crazy. And then over the last couple of years, we've seen people confirm, people in authority confirm actually, yeah, there were a lot in the crowd that day. I mean, that's now a fact. Did you know that going in? Speaker 1: No. They Speaker 0: were no. So just for perspective, since you've been to a lot of these events, there's a huge a planned demonstration in Washington, D. C. Will there always be assets, agents, people working for federal agencies in the crowd and civilian close? Speaker 1: There always could be. And for like inaugurations, There would usually be some combined teams out there, one for communications but just for situational awareness. So It wouldn't be surprising, 4th July, different things like that where you have threat pictures or concerning threat pictures. Speaker 0: And what does that look like? Does that mean, FBI agents dressed in dockers and tennis shoes trying to Speaker 1: Well, just be plain clothes, plain clothes to blend in. So that wouldn't be unusual and it'd be, you know, just standard police work. That'd be a good police work. So coming into January 6, and and and I talk about it in the book with The fact that shortly after January 6, I'm driving through Loudoun County. I'm coming I actually just talked to somebody from the Hill, and I get a call from overseas and it say it's press. I don't remember which what it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they started asking me about feds in the crowd. I was like, no. No. I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau. They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, think about that. And Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action To keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over. That's a big that's a big deal. Fast forward to February of this year 2023 and the GAO report that says, on January 4 January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that we're talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR, area of responsibility. By January 6, they were tracking 18 or 19 in the GAO report. Domestic terrorists. So think about that. They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming to this event, So of course, they're going to have resources on them. And then you're not going to be just putting 1 agent, you're going to have multiples. So it would be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had in there. So That would be regular standard police works. I would be surprised by it. But not to share that in the intelligence? That's concerning. Speaker 0: So I mean, it seems like common sense suggests anyway that you would have to tell the Chief of Capitol Police that, hey, we've got our guys in the crowd. Like just because, I mean, you would want to know the difference, correct? Speaker 1: You would absolutely want to know the difference and deconfliction. Want to have things like that. A lot of the folks will already know there's a lot of standard procedures for way to deconflict, so you don't have blue on blue type of situations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yogananda Pittman, the former Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security of the Capitol Police, was appointed as acting chief after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. However, there were concerns about an intelligence failure and her role in it. She later became the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, which raised questions about a potential reward. It was revealed that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by the Capitol Police. Whistleblowers within the intelligence unit had raised concerns and faced punishment. This situation appears suspicious and raises doubts about the integrity of the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's Yogananda Pittman? Yogananda Pittman was Speaker 1: my Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security. Speaker 0: Okay. So, did she have the intelligence that you didn't have? Speaker 1: I I don't know. Speaker 0: What do you mean you don't know? Speaker 1: I I I don't know. I you don't know what you don't know. I don't know what she had and what she didn't have, but I do know that when you look at it and we immediately knew, I mean, anybody immediately knew. One of the first things you start to think about is this an intelligence failure. So think about it. We go through January 6. I was begging for the National Guard, refused before, Fused during it. We get the capital under control. You know, I get them to where they can go back into session, 7:30. They elect to go in at 8 and then the house goes at 9. But nonetheless so think about this. The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, Blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief. Speaker 0: But Yogananda Pittman, You just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, Which again doesn't seem like a failure. It seems very intentional to me. But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible, Correct? Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's intelligence failure, see, my thing is Do a proper analysis. You know? You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I mean, she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence. So she didn't get the position from the from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. So she Speaker 0: Where where did she wind up? Speaker 1: Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting. Speaker 0: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district? Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: In the Bay Area. Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: So you just kind of take the Bay Bridge over there and that's where she is now. What does that position pay, do you know? Speaker 1: I think it pays pretty well. There was a Pays extraordinarily well. I'm sure it pays pretty good. It's interesting, there was a hearing just recently that was on it's on TV. You can look at it, where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about Her position, it turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave. So she'd leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the capital police for months later. Speaker 0: Oh, so you should get the benefits. Speaker 1: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, And nobody originally was told. Speaker 0: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which Demonstrably didn't have the intelligence that needed to protect the building. That person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley. Speaker 1: That is correct. And I will say that So Speaker 0: that looks like a reward to me. Speaker 1: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence, and I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became whistle blowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign. Yep. Speaker 0: This looks like a scam. I
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus the 20 the the January 6 attack. Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House were famously Saint John's Church was set on fire. Speaker 0: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress Specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom. It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. They're from prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service from defending the the White House. So think about that. Church. You know, who made that decision? Again, all I know is, you know, Nutrien's hands were tied. So Mayor Bowser, Higher? I don't know. But think about that. Speaker 1: Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Oh. That more officers were injured Hit that riot. Then were injured on January 6th, I think. Speaker 0: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. Jail report. More officers injured at the Protest by the White House and on January 6th. And I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped According to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House. There were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there. There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Hay Adams Hotel on fire that was occupied. Think about that. Charges dropped. No no such situation. I mean, when you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that. And that's what appears to have happened. Speaker 1: I mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different, don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington D. C. Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House? Speaker 0: Again, I don't I I protect the White House. I don't I see what you're saying there. I I don't know. I mean, I think not. Speaker 1: Like, I mean, it's a hypothetical. I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem seems amazing.
January 6 - The Capital Police Chief was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - The White House Under Attack was not Stopped & More Officers Injured Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

This is a meeting just before January 6, where BLM Leader(s) Government Workers, Media Leaks, were Conspiring against the US Government, & planning the REAL Insurrection, including violence & breaking windows. As you heard in the above statements from the Capitol Police Chief, Antifa was there and he was not briefed of their presence. Why wouldn’t the Capitol Police Chief be briefed of this? https://rumble.com/v2478bm-january-6-meeting-exposed-blm-government-workers-media-leaks-breaking-windo.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Shut It Down DC discusses their plans for responding to a potential coup and contested election scenarios. They emphasize the need to take action in the streets and disrupt business as usual in Congress. There is talk of revolution and potential violence, with some suggesting breaking windows to enter government buildings. Leaking information to journalists and creating parallel structures are mentioned as tactics. Federal workers are encouraged to engage in noncooperation to undermine those in power. The importance of communication with grassroots groups and sustained organizing is highlighted. Practical examples of slowing down processes and exposing wrongdoing are shared. Overall, the focus is on taking decisive action to resist a potential coup.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really wanna hear from, Shut It Down DC about this. Do you do we have any plans for how to respond if there's a coup? Speaker 1: Yeah. We, have been in discussion for a couple months About, how to respond to different contested election scenarios. 1st step is that we we think that we need to start the The post election phase in the streets. Congress is planning on coming to town and passing laws again and, like, having business as usual, and we're saying there's If if we're in a coup, there's no time for business as usual. Speaker 0: I heard someone in the chat talking about revolution time, and so I encourage, You know, for all of us to be fighting for revolution before today, today, tomorrow, afterwards. Speaker 2: We're facing an administration and a potential coup and a Potential insurrection where, efforts to criminalize this are going to be even greater. Understanding that everything that we're doing now in this moment is laying the groundwork for what is going to come. Is there going to be a war? Are people gonna get killed? Like, is that on anybody else's mind? I'm guessing it is. We're gonna see potential fighting all over the country or in some hot spots. We might need to think about that. And I know as I you know, I said earlier how, you know, we may find ourselves in the streets with people with different tactics than ours. But, like, there may be some people that are willing to break the windows to get into the government buildings. Like, If that's what we need to do, then we shouldn't fight about that. Let's do that. Let's take over the buildings. Speaker 3: Text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me To be the source of the leaks. Speaker 4: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Making sure that we're naming What is happening is a coup. Speaker 5: Totally agreed. In the subbound BP conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal side, we, also are often Call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Speaker 4: President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, But when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that we all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power? If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole, need. It ultimately comes down to individual decisions and personal choice. Deciding what to do or what not to do is a very personal decision. It's based on context. It's based on your rank, on your tolerance for risk, on your preparation and frankly where you sit in the federal, federal bureaucracy. We're talking about the range of different tactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. And another act of commission, albeit Highly, you know, risky, and there are a number of, great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. So another act of, Of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. Speaker 6: As an attorney in the federal government, I I am finding the chat suggestions very interesting, and I just do wanna remind people that we lose our status as federal employees if we strike. Speaker 7: And there's been a little conversation going on here, for example, about Black Lives Matter and how that is an example of a nonpartisan political statement. Guess that's been previously litigated, but whether or not you do a misdemeanor or an infraction on federal property or on public property, really doesn't affect, most of the jobs, that you would be considered for. Speaker 6: Yeah. As an attorney, I think I'm We we're highly, you know, that's one of the things we have to be careful about. Speaker 4: I would just say this is also the importance of being in communication with and in touch With groups, civic groups, grassroots groups that are preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, that, You know, there that the election goes sideways, you know, so everything from choose democracy to hold the line, to To shut down, we count on us. I listed a few of those in the slides earlier, but they're the ones who are really in the vanguard of Helping people think about, interpret red lines, and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond kind of street protests and demonstrations, but kind of Sustained organizing an action. Speaker 7: What does it look like in practical terms to put you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 6: At the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, When the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report, and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson, and the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So, again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's it's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved. It's it was really a way to Stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well.
January 6 Meeting Exposed: BLM, Government Workers, Media Leaks, Breaking Windows- They we’re Planning the REAL Insurrection! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth My Website— www.theunshakeablepundit.com rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We know Antifa was involved and was there according to Attorney Joeseph McBride uncovering A 96-Page DC Police Report which showed the Government Knew Antifa was coming https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H3mHiUZCz9jyfDFTTpYw7VuYCgMtuLWW/view Not only that, this report shows they were anticipating violence and still, Nancy Pelosi denied Trumps request to provide the National Guard. Here is the US Capitol Police CDU Operations Plan for J6 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yfivz5NdQa90gVXoC1nKNN_1zsDK4J1V/view Here are Several Documented Instances CLIP 1 A Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him This person was never charged. Why? This Video https://rumble.com/v2ceie4-january-6-masked-man-with-earpiece-caught-tearing-up-capital-building-windo.html CLIP 2 January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfl9k-january-6-antifa-identified-and-forced-from-the-steps-at-capital-building.html CLIP 3 January 6: Two Camera Angles of Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfoxs-january-6-antifa-breaking-capital-windows-while-trump-supporters-stop-them-.html

January 6: Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

CLIP 1 Here is a DC Officer admitting they were also undercover as Antifa in the crowd. “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” This Video https://rumble.com/v35qnwc-january-6-dc-officer-we-go-undercover-as-antifa-in-the-crowd.html CLIP 2 One of the more concerning things to come out of the Jan 6 Report, or should I say did not come out, was the fact they Hid Any Mention of the Pipe Bomber, who was specifically responsible for Shutting Down Congress That Day This video is proof that the FBI lied and this is a coverup. The average rate of a CCT camera in America is 15 fps (Frames per Seccond). The video the FBI released to the public was 1 fps. You read that right. ☝️ The average gas station camera is 15 fps, which would make the camera(s) at the DNC fifteen times worse…. Than a gas station. Who was it? Antifa? FBI? If it was a Trump supporter they would have been front page news. The FBI are able to track down peaceful protesters across the US but not a suspect planting bombs? This video https://rumble.com/v228q0m-fbi-releases-impossible-1-fps-video-of-the-dc-pipe-bomber-impeach-merrick-g.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI agents are seeking tips to identify the suspect who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party headquarters. Videos show the suspect sitting on a park bench before one of the bombs was placed. The frame rate of CCTV cameras is typically around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the January 6th pipe bomb suspect shows only 1 FPS, which is highly unlikely for unaltered footage. The DNC has a history of security concerns, including the Watergate scandal, and the use of 1 FPS footage is statistically improbable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lester, FBI agents say they have no idea who planted the bombs, and they hope these new videos will generate some valuable tips. 1 shows the suspect walking up and sitting on a park bench near the Democratic National Party headquarters. 1 of the bombs was later planted in this same area. Speaker 1: Frames per second, like its name implies, is the number of a Individual images or frames, the system captures every second. The average industry frame rate of most CCTV cameras is around 15 frames a per second. Speaker 2: We also recommend using a minimum of 15 FPS or frames per second. Speaker 0: Now here at Proactive Security, we recommend actually 15 frames per second. Speaker 2: What you're looking at is the actual frame speed of the security video the FBI released to the public of the January 6th pipe bomb Suspect. It's just 1 frame per second. You're going to learn now why that is virtually impossible unless this tape is not the original source footage. A comprehensive study in 2021 by one of the world's leading authorities on security cameras found that 0% of cameras in fuse in America today operated at just 1 frame per second. Statistically speaking, the odds that the video the FBI a Police to the public was unaltered is less than 1%. The average gas station in America uses 15 frames per second. That make the DNC national headquarters 15 times worse than the average gas station. A Meanwhile, we know the DNC cares so much about security at this area that for years, they have stationed a physical guard during a during the daytime right at this site. And that makes sense. It was the break in of the DNC national headquarters 50 years ago that Pause the largest scandal in American history, Watergate. Between the history of attacks on the DNC building, plus the fact that DC was once the murder capital of the country plus the fact that 0% of cameras in use today use one frame per second. It is virtually impossible the tape the FBI released was the actual unedited footage.
January 6 - DC Officer “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
FBI Releases Impossible 1 FPS Video of the DC “Pipe Bomber”- Impeach Merrick Garland Now! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We also now know there was an FBI presence on January 6— Hundreds of agents in the crowd when at first they said there was little to no FBI presence How many of these agents played a role in instigating or steering violence? It was later discovered that Internal FBI Communications in the United States v Ethan Nordean case revealed the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were Found to be DESTROYING EVIDENCE! This not only proves the FBI lied on the stand, but there were criminal informants involved who sought to have their records altered to conceal their involvement! This may be a Brady violation! Brady Disclosure: “The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2cj02o-january-6-internal-fbi-communications-reveal-the-fbi-demanded-the-removal-o.html United States https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23699546-nordean-filing-on-fbi-testimony In addition, a motion filed by a J6’er Pezzola’s attorney, Roger Root, the FBI Admitted to having 40 Undercover Agents (that we know of) Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 The DOJ admitted that of the 13 Proud Boys involved with J6, eight or more of them were paid by the FBI to provide the government information about the group. The Proud Boys were outnumbered 10-1 by undercover gov’t agents and informants at the Capitol Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection

Video Transcript AI Summary
New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New bombshell information coming out in regards to the internal FBI messages surrounding January 6th, demanding confidential human source reports be edited to remove agent participation. In the Nordean filing on FBI testimony, case number 121cr00 175tjk, document number 678, filed on March 9th 2023, United States of America versus Ethan Nordian as the defendant. Hu Nordean's notice of argument in support of impeachment of witness with hidden Jenks related communications. Today, government witness special agent Nicole Miller was cross examined. She testified that she understood her legal duty under the Jenks act to produce the US attorney's office written statements relating to the subject matter of her testimony. Miller acknowledged that among those statements were messages to be sent in the FBI's link messaging system where bureau employees communicate with one another. She testified that in order to comply with her Jinx obligations, he compiled her links messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was then produced to the USAO. The version of Miller's Excel sheet produced to the defense contained 25 rows of her linked messages. In cross examination, the agent acknowledged she compiled that disclosure. She testified that those messages constituted a complete production of her Jinx statements from links. However, a close examination of the agent's sheet revealed over 1,000 hidden Excel rows of messages. Further on into the documents reveal an agent's request to special agent Miller to go into a CHS informant report that Miller just put together and edit out the agent was present. Quote, you need to go into that CHS report you just put and edit out that I was present, end quote. Hu- further along in these documents reveal that Miller's communication with another agent who states that the agent's FBI boss assigned her 338 items of evidence I have to destroy. So not only have we learned that the F. Was in fact there for the January 6th events. We also learned that through Ray Epps and other evidence that they were in fact embedded inside the crowd. They acted as Trump supporters. They infiltrated groups and invoked violence. Hue, and now we are learning that they are destroying evidence.
January 6 Bombshell! Internal FBI Communications Reveal the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were DESTROYING EVIDENCE! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
Nordean Filing on FBI Testimony documentcloud.org
SHOCKING UPDATE: FBI Now Admits to 40 Undercover Agents Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 #Fedsurrection | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft Federal operative takes down fencing on January 6 before Trump supporters arrived in mass at the US Capitol. thegatewaypundit.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

What role did Ray Epps play? For who? What agency? The FBI seems most logical because The FBI only removed 3 people from the Most Wanted list, one of them being Ray Epps. And it appears they were doing everything they can to cover for him. CLIP 1 New Footage of Ray Epps appeared out of the 14,000 hours of hidden footage. In a nutshell, the first video is what was played in the courtroom, in the Proud Boys trial. The video shows a “GLITCH” on the feed, at a specific point in time. The second ORIGINAL video, clearly shows no distortion but shows Ray Epps entering the scene and makes the first breach through a black fence with an army of all black dressed supposed “MAGA supporters”. They doctored the video to be presented in court! Clear tampering of evidence! CLIP 2 Tucker Carlson uncovered a New Video that exposed Ray Epps for committing PERJURY. https://rumble.com/v2c179s-january-6-new-video-exposes-ray-epps-for-perjury.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, the role of intelligence and law enforcement agencies during the Capitol events remains a mystery. It is known that there were undercover federal agents present, but their purpose is unclear. Ray Epps, a figure seen encouraging the crowd to enter the Capitol, has not been indicted for his actions. Despite admitting to orchestrating the protests and helping people get there, Epps claimed he never entered the Capitol. However, surveillance footage contradicts his testimony, showing him remaining at the Capitol for at least another half hour. The January 6th committee likely knew about this, yet defended Epps. The reasons for Epps' actions and the committee's defense remain unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the enduring mysteries of January 6th is the role that intelligence and law enforcement agencies played in the events of that day. We know there was some number of undercover federal agents in the crowd at the Capitol. Officials have since admitted that under oath. But what exactly were they doing there? The January 6th committee worked hard are to hide the answer to that question. We do know from contemporaneous video tape that a mysterious figure called Ray Epps encouraged the crowd should go into the capital. For some reason, Epps has never been indicted for that, but there's no question he didn't. We need to go into the capital. Were at all. Under public pressure, the January 6th committee finally interviewed Ray Epps. Epps told the committee that he never entered the capital and therefore never committed a crime. His text messages showed that at 2:12 PM, he boasted to his nephew view that he had, quote, orchestrated the protests at the Capitol. He admitted he helped get people there. Yet, curiously, congressional Democrats consider Ray Epps an ally, not an insurrectionist. Tonight, we can tell you that at the very least, Ray Epps lied in his sworn testimony to the January 6th committee, Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he he'd already left the capitol grounds to return to his hotel room. That is not true. The surveillance footage we found shows that in fact, Ray Epps remained at the capitol for at least another half an hour. You're seeing that on your screen now. What was Epps doing there? We can't say, but we do know that he lied had 2 investigators. The January 6th committee likely knew this too. Democrats had access to the same tape, yet they defended Ray Epps. No investigation would do that.
January 6: New Video exposes Ray Epps for PERJURY and Lied to Investigators! rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 Ray Epps Adopted Daughter was interviewed by @dom_lucre & she tells quite a sick disturbing story into who Ray Epps is… MY NOTES: (TSTM= Twitter Space Time Mark) In this clip, at the 1:28:00 TSTM, she claims Ray Epps forced her to strip naked while she was on her period at 14 years old, & forced her to sleep outside in the cold, and she had to sleep with the dog to get warm. 59:20 TSTM- Dom confirms in a Twitter post she is who she says she is via adoption papers, brith certificate, & photos 45:45 TSTM- She underwent 6 name changes indicating she may have been kidnapped 47:45 TSTM- She was photographed naked “scouted from a modeling agency” 1:00:00 TSTM- Ray was a high ranking LDS priesthood holder 1:12:30 TSTM- Rays nickname was sniper on the roof 1:20:15 TSTM- J6’er George Tanios spoke to her This Clip https://rumble.com/v2keb8w-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-talks-about-having-to-strip-and-sleep-o.html Full Discussion https://rumble.com/v2ke1xa-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-on-her-being-abused-and-molested.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares a disturbing experience involving Robyn and Ray. Robyn would sometimes be incoherent due to medication. The speaker recalls two specific incidents. In one, Ray made the speaker strip in front of him while thinking Robyn was asleep. The speaker felt embarrassed and uncomfortable, especially since they were only 14 and hadn't started using tampons yet. Ray then made the speaker sleep outside, even though it was cold. The speaker had to snuggle up with their dog for warmth. Ray threatened the speaker, saying he would hunt them down if they tried to run away or seek help. The next day, the speaker was allowed back inside. The speaker also expresses their disdain for Robyn, calling them a piece of shit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was always not always. It would be when Robyn was incoherent. She took medications. I don't know what they were at the time, but, she was like a zombie, and there was 1 there was 2 specific times that stick out to me one time, was when he was having me strip in front of him because he thought that Robin was in bed asleep, and 1 by 1, I had to take my clothing off, and I remember at that time, I'm, fuck. It's embarrassing. I hadn't started using tampons yet, I was 14, and I got to the point where it was just my panties, and he was sitting on the couch, and I remember looking at him, and he said, drop them, and I said, please don't make me do this. And, I had to. And then, he made me sleep outside, but before that happened, before I hold my panties down, you know, on my period, you know, do the math, Haben had walked out of the bedroom, and down the hall, she looked at me, and she looked at Ray, and looked back at me and shook her head, went back into her room and shut the door, and that's when I had to continue taking off my panties, and then he said, now you can sleep outside. And I had to sleep outside, and yes, we lived in Arizona, and I do not remember the month, but I remember being cold, and I remember having to snuggle up with my dog to keep me warm. And he said, if you try to run away, I will hunt you down, and I will find you. And if you try to call the police or tell anybody, just remember who are they gonna believe? Me or you? I'm an adult near a child, and so I stayed naked in my backyard with my dog all night, and then I was allowed in the next day. And Robin is just as big of a piece of shit, if not more, than he is,
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Talks About Having to Strip & Sleep Outside While on Her Period - Abuse She Suffered from Ray Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Tells Horrific & Heartbreaking Story on Her Being Abused & Molested by Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

January 6 Entrapment! The following footage was Obtained from the United States department of justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper West Terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. The video shows they were waved in by police. It is clear no violence or crime was committed by the people in this video. They were allowed in and are included in the video below. https://rumble.com/v1135ol-bombshell-january-6-entrapment-new-video-surfaces.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Surveillance footage from the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, shows police officers allowing protesters to exit through the Upper West Terrace doors. A man holding an American flag catches the door and waves to the crowd outside. Meanwhile, another man with a red cap approaches the interior doors and is let in by a police officer. A large group of protesters enters the Capitol through the doors, with police officers standing by and allowing them to pass. Around 250 protesters entered that day, many of whom are charged with felony obstruction. At one point, a police officer walks with the protesters, showing no signs of fear. Eventually, police stop the protesters briefly before allowing them to enter again. At 2:47 PM, the doors are closed and no more individuals enter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following footage was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper west terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Just after 2:33 PM, police officers allow 5 individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 2:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 2:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 2:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors. They can see police officers standing at the interior doors, allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 2:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 2:36:54, Speaker 1: the police allowed the crowd to pass. At 2:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. Speaker 0: At 2:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. Speaker 1: At 2:44 pm, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. Speaker 0: At 2:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear closed the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individuals entered through the Upper West Terrace doors.
BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on Truth Socia rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

More Proof it was a a SET UP. Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel At the 0:34 Mark Tactical Officer: “….Any identifiers?” USCP Officer: “They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel. I don’t know the wristband color. They will have a wristband somewhere. OK?” https://rumble.com/v35s94o-january-6-undercover-feds-identifiers-theyll-have-a-wristband-or-candy-stri.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person describes a man wearing a black vest with a pink blue line and dark hair. They mention that he may be around 27 years old and has something on his hip. The speaker also mentions that there were too many people for the police to reach. They describe another person as a white male with dark hair. The speaker then talks about the appearance of the uniformed officers, mentioning that they may have a wristband and a stripe on their gun barrel. However, they are unsure of the color of the wristband.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys are here. Black vest. Pink blue line. Thing on, dark hair. And he's kinda like a lookin' like a 27 or something on his hip. No police identity came couldn't get to them because there were so many people. 5 piece of white mix on white male. White male, dark hair. Yeah. Yeah. Alright. Looks like grayish black, maybe maybe a, digital gun. Uniform guys have any identifiers like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a handy stripe on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband line, somewhere.
January 6 - Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 12:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In light of recent calls for "payback" and the destruction of Gaza, it's crucial to remember the innocent women and children living there. We must consider the consequences of promoting hate, as it may lead to those indoctrinated into hating America carrying out attacks. Let's not forget the tragedy of 9/11 and the millions of lives lost due to false claims of terrorism. The US government and its intelligence agencies, in partnership with Ericsson, need to be held accountable. It's time for us to strive for improvement and justice.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The idea that people are calling for "payback" and the "flattening of Gaza" - when you know there's innocent women and children living there totally unaware of the context... What happens when the hate YOU are pushing winds up sending the very people who THIS COUNTRY indoctrinated into hating America end up doing something here? I have to ask because how could you forget what happened on 9/11 and the millions of lives that were lost over a complete lie over Terrorism. The Federal Government of the United States and its intelligence agencies are the Terrorists... LITERALLY. They are partnered with Ericsson. We have to do better... and we will!

Saved - October 19, 2023 at 4:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
"The Turncoats: Signs & Red Lights" exposes the presence of traitors within influential circles, including those associated with D. Trump. These individuals, such as Glen Beck, Rudy Giuliani, and Jared Kushner, maintain a clean public image while aligning themselves with controversial agendas. Conservative media focuses on specific issues to divert attention from their connections and potential wrongdoing. The controlled nature of both liberal and conservative platforms by Zionist forces slows down the exposure of these traitors. Revealing their crimes alongside the arrest of other accused individuals would be demoralizing, requiring delicate handling. The article highlights the need to question the limits of power and the true intentions of those we consider heroes.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Turncoats: The Signs & Red Lights People, what did I tell you months ago? "Mass Arrest" will include people you like. People you follow. People you call heros. People who are so called "friends" of D. Trump. People who worked with D. Trump. People who endorsed D. Trump. People who were invited to Mar-A-Lago by D. Trump. People who are apart of "The Reawaken America" tour. So on and so forth. All you have to do is look at the people thar have been in positions of power for tye past 23 years. What have they done about all the false flags that happened on their watch? That should tell you everything you need to know. This is ABCs. You have people in "The Patriot Movement" trying to latch on to thus idea of what they think America is based on what is presented to them by those who portray themselves as leaders as to how we can take the country back without exposing any of the people responsible for their assistance in ensuring it remained in the hands of thieves who they call heroes today. How can these two worlds coexist in the same time space continuum? -These traitors are invited on their platforms to speak. -These traitors are guest at patriot events. -These traitors are called heros for fighting injustices when they were co-conspirators against Julian Assange. -These traitors were invited to dinners with people responsible for 9/11. How can they walk among us unscathed? Because naive people can not fathom this level of evil where the very people they considered great abd influential were apart of the most detestable crimes. • Glen Beck • Rudy Giuliani • Jim Jordan • Jim Caviezel • Tim Ballard • Omarosa Newman • Jared Kushner All these people have a public image that is considered Safe & Clean. How? Because they know how to present themselves as the opposite of what we detest Liberals for. This is basically the shield that keeps these people from sharing the filth of leftist media. Because they have poise, speech etiquette, style, and a patriotic persona that sells the illusion that they are fighting on behalf of the American people. All you have to do to get a clearer picture is to take the Liberals & Lefties out of the equation. What does that leave you with? People who know how to talk well, act well, dress well, behave well, and sale a dream very well. But when you look at who they are connected to you will understand they are putting on a show to present themselves as the better alternative to what you detest the most. What is that? ● The LGTBQ Agenda ● The Transgender Agenda ● The Free Speech Censor Agenda ● The Drag Queen Story Hour Agenda ● The Pedophilia Agenda ● The Green Agenda ● The UN Agenda This is what conservative media talking points are predicated on. When they say the right things about what you are frustrated about we presume we have someone in positions of influence who are fighting on our behalf. The war for your mind is never that simple. They only focus on those aforementioned things because it keeps you from asking questions that may put their platforms in compromising positions. Especially if you bring up things that you have come to discover on this channel. Why have none of these questions been asked of these so called powerful people? How come their power has never been put to the test as to what may bring into question where their power Starts & Stops? Have you noticed they are not willing to test their limits on people who we would deem sketchy? All you have to do is scroll down and look at the list of traitors. Then look at who they answer to. The Khazarians. Both sides. Liberals & Conservative platforms are controlled by Zionist. This is why this "Sting-Op" has gone at this slow & steady pace because people in "The Patriot Movement" are going to assume "The Bad Guys" ate taking over if people who most deem as heroes are brought down with everyone we accuse of "Crimes Against Humanity" who were on Jeffrey Epstein Island. Do you see how demoralizing it would be against the entire plan to show people that the US Military is on our side and not corrupt? How could this be if someone like M. Flynn are taken down along side Mark Milley? This is how delicate everything is at the moment because at the drop of a hat people who are calling for arrest to happen yesterday will automatically call Donald Trump the antichrist because he is not doing nothing about all these Patriots being arrested. How? Because these people are oblivious to their crimes. Because they have a good public image. No different than the Liberals who can not believe Stephen Colbert was involved in child sex crimes. All you have to do is look at the list that is already available and switch the names with people like R. Giuliani. What are you left with? The same reaction you see in the comments from the last post.

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 8:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the final battle against an ancient power, we face various alarming factors. Remember the missing explosives, the list of cities to avoid, UN troops sightings, emergency phones for Congress, and the power grid blackout warning. Senator Tuberville's expectations and knowledge of the incentives behind these attacks raise questions. Biden's policies on domestic security, immigration, intelligence operations, border security, and foreign policy may leave America vulnerable. Russia's involvement in the Crimea Bridge attacks adds another layer. We eagerly await justice, but must be prepared for the consequences and fallout that come with it. The elite will retaliate to prevent disclosure and major loss of life is expected. Let's be ready to face the consequences and put an end to the suffering caused by an ancient evil.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨The Final Battle: The End Of A Ancient Power Do you remember the 60,000 chemical explosives that came up missing during a rail trip from Wyoming to California? Do you remember the list of 17 cities to be avoided? Do you remember the UN Troops being spotted in different cities? Do you remember the emergency phones that were given to congress? Do you remember the power grid blackout warning? Because we are approaching critical time where all these things will become a factor. We are facing the end of a regime who are are their last lap around the block and they will not go away quietly. You have to ask yourself why does Senator Tommy Tuberville expect these types of events? What does he know regarding the incentives behind these attacks? What are the Biden policies that would leave America open to these false flags? Domestic Security Policy? Immigration Policy? Intelligence Operations? Border Security Policy? Foreign Policy? Whatever it may be Russia may have something to do with it given the investigation into the Crimea Bridge attacks that will lead back to the US Government. Many of us are sitting around waiting for a direct offense into the desertification of the 2020 election. Many of us are waiting for Mass Arrest. Many of us are waiting for the Military Tribunals. Many of us are waiting for the Jeffrey Epstein Client List. And rightfully so. But do we know what comes with this? Ask yourself why a direct disclosure in these areas have yet to make it on the airwaves and saturated over every method of communication? Because there are many contingency plans in place where the elite will have no choice but to retaliate by ensuring we do not get any of these things without major loss of life in the process on the way to the justice we all want. They already have everything mapped out the moment we get a whiff of one of them being arrested and sent to Gitmo. Are you ready for the fallout that comes with the justice we all await? Because it will accompany what will bring an end to all the suffering caused by people who serve a very ancient evil. So I hope you are prepared to face all the consequences as a result of bringing justice to these Satanist & Luciferians.

Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts express strong concerns about the government's actions, describing them as unconstitutional and acts of violence. The author emphasizes the right to self-defense and warns against accusing citizens of violent threats. They urge the government to deescalate the situation and avoid violence. The second post claims that the platform in question is helping to end the war started by others.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Please let it be known: These are wholly unconstitutional and unprovoked acts of violence, treason and war being committed by our government (and many of its favorite private sector and foreign interest operatives) against the American People. As American Citizens, we have an inalienable and Constitutionally-protected right to defend ourselves from all enemies. Especially from that of a radical, tyrannical (and largely illegitimate) government — the gravest of all domestic threats to our nation and the very reason for the existence of our sacred 2nd Amendment. Understand that We the People now exercise those rights in preparation for your inevitable further escalation, as it’s become evident you’re determined to continue taking our beloved Union down this horrifying path. Therefore, from this point forward, anyone who publicly levies unrighteous allegations or accusations of “violent threats” against the very citizens you currently threaten, will be identified as an enemy combatant. Period. Especially in cases where such accusations clearly serve as a preemptive means to excuse any additional, preplanned and/or unlawful measures you may intend to take against citizens. Our most concerted efforts towards intelligence gathering and due diligence will immediately be directed at them and their closest associates. We beg you to reconsider your commitment to such an unbelievably insidious mission and ask that you promptly take action to deescalate this rapidly deteriorating situation. Help us avoid violence and/or the loss of life within our own borders at all costs. Let me be clear, NONE OF US wants that under any circumstances. None of us. But also be advised, if you’re determined to force us into protecting ourselves and our loved ones, we will fight to defend liberty by any means necessary and according to the rules of engagement. We will learn everything there is to know about you, everyone you work with and everyone you care about. Your sinister aims, agendas, objectives and transgressions will instantly also become theirs. And to be fully transparent, much of this intel has already been gathered, widely disseminated and stored several times over. So unless you’re fully prepared to nuke tens of millions of your own countrymen completely out of existence, there is no scenario that exists where you ultimately win in the end and get to ride off into the sunset to live happily ever after. That genie will never go back in the bottle for you or them. Ever. Again, I implore you to end this madness and defuse this situation entirely at once. For everyone’s sake, including and especially America as a nation.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

“This platform” didn’t help start shit, homie. Bioweapons-using pedophiles hellbent on subsidizing terrorism in our streets, waging law fare against political opponents and stealing our elections to cover their tracks and support foreign interests started this shit. This platform is helping to END the war y’all started 4 years ago.

@JoeLesh4 - CRYPTOKNIGHT

@DecentFiJC @elonmusk congratulations!you’re the proud new owner of the platform that helped start “Civil War 2.0” 👏 👏 https://t.co/Zacc4lgkfu

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 2:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Military is using the Jeffrey Epstein Blackbook to expose the Cabal, but there is much more to uncover beyond Epstein. Names like Richard Branson, Frank Guistra, and Clive Davis are involved. The Statute of Liberty, hospitals, churches, schools, and even restaurants have underground tunnels linked to human trafficking. The Epstein list is just a tool to force the Cabal's hand, but the real shock will come from what has been hidden. Discovering the truth about child consumption will be more impactful. We must be patient and consider the consequences of revealing everything prematurely.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

You know what so foolish of us? We actually believe the US Military are leaning on the Jeffrey Epstein Blackbook to close in on the Cabal to liberate us from the clutches of doom. People do you all know they have everything on tape? This is why the USSF is so important. Everything will be controlled from the satellite operated by US Military. This is one major reason why we had to wait. (Zero Interference) Do you know they have all the names for those who never went to any island? Do you actually believe that everything starts & stops with Jeffrey Epstein? What about Richard Branson? What about Frank Guistra? What about Clive Davis? Do you know that Statute Of Liberty is a human trafficking hotspot? Your hospitals have underground tunnels. (Cedar Sinai) Your church has underground tunnels. (The Vatican) Your schools have underground tunnels. (Ohio State University) Your lofty office jobs have underground tunnels. (Capital Complex DC) The Vatican has underground tunnels. Your local restaurant has underground tunnels. (Bed-Stuy NYC) Guess what? All of this is on film. The Jeffrey Epstein list is just a tool to use to force certain chess moves to facilitate operations that gain at every attempt the Cabal makes to stop the disclosures. We do not need the list. So you are frustrated at the wrong thing. This is why it's treated as a low priority because this is not what will actually shock the nation. It will be the why behind everything. Remember this was a control mechanism by the Cabal to keep your elected officials in check along with celebrities. When it comes to what has been hidden from you this is when you will start to have heart palpitations. The J. Epstein list will not do this.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Wait until you find out Who & What has been eating the children. You have not begun to realize what you are up against. The J. Epstein Blackbook will be a distant memory once you find out where these children have been taken and what they were food for. You all are frustrated for the wrong reasons. We have billions of people unaware of what you come to know. If all this gets out before its time this world will literally turn into Mad Max. And guess what? We will all be back at square one. It will be as if you made no progress at all. We are a fringe group here. This is a gift & curse. The world is not ready to know even the basics of what you have learned. You all forget we live in a economy 1st. Business still has to go on as usual as if none of this stuff is occurring. People are still in survival mode. They couldn't care less about things discussed on this channel. You all need to keep this in mind.

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 11:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many important events and information have been shared here that people should look up for themselves. From military surrenders to financial policies, political connections, and hidden agendas, there is a lot to uncover. Don't rely on mainstream media or clueless family and friends for confirmation. Pay attention to what's happening and question everything. The truth is out there if you're willing to dig deeper.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Mic Check: The Clueless & Careless How many people told you about the 10,000 troops that surrendered to Russia? (Look it up) How many people told you about Basel 3 before it hut headlines? (Look it up) How many people told you about V. Putin blocking Khazarian Jews from entering Ukraine? (Look it up). How many people told you about ISO-20022 before it became a policy fir all countries? (Look it up) How many people told you ISO was an anti money laundering platform that targets sanctioned leaders? (Look it up) How many people told you about Klaus Schawb being trained by Henry Kissinger? (Look it up) How many people told you about the West V vs EPA Case? (Look it up) How many people told you about the United States vs Moore case? (Look it up). How many people told you about the four over turned local elections? (Look it up) How many people told you about the Iraq Dinar removing the USD on January 1st? (Look it up) How many people told you their budget was equivalent to 70 tons of gold? (Look it up) How many people told you Chuck Grassley was a Freemason? (Look it up) How many people told you Michael Flynn was connected to CIA and responsible for the torture chambers? (Look it up) How many people told you Roger Stone was connected to Keith Rainer & Jeffrey Epstein and J6? (Look it up) How many people told you about Tim Ballard and his fake rescue operations and gave you the info on the salaries he and his wife makes? (Look it up) How many people told you about SOFR before you read it here? (Look it up) How many people told you about the Olu Warri Kingdom that is connected to every world leader including president D. Trump who controls this platform? (Look it up) How many people gave you the list of Congress who had dual citizenship aside from the ones that were already shared that you got here 1st? (look it up) How many people told you about Roger Stone being responsible for the Brooks Brothers Riot in 2000? (Look it up). How many people went into detail about the celebrity chef deaths who all were found dead that worked for well known political figures besides the one who worked for Barrack Obama? (look it up) Who told you about LIBOR being revoked on July 1st for SOFR to replace it? (Look it up) Who told you about Israel being defunct on October 31st the same day that China removed the state from their maps? (Look it up) Who gave you the connection about Kobe Bryant and Hunter Biden's partnership through Harves Group & Harves Sports in China? (Look it up) How many people showed you the direct statements from E. Musk regarding the medical breakthroughs that he plans to introduce on Twitter/X that people are not privy to that he says will change the world? (Look it up) Who told you about the five families controlling the Republicans that Jim George mentioned when he was running for speakers that later cam out in mainstream news? (Look it up) I can go on. But why in the world would I make up the least interesting post about trains & planes in Europe compared to what you actually follow my account for? Are you serious? All the info you learned here that became widely known after some time yet you need proof for this? Even though it's provided I highly doubt my military contacts will give me inaccurate info on something of this magnitude that are actually affecting average people. People what are you going to do when I'm gone? For all you saying I'm lying, none of what I said is happening and that you have family & friends here and there saying the opposite. Or that everything is normal. Have you paid attention to anything? Why do you think T-mobile is now trying to implement Fines & Penalties into their services based on what you say and share on social media? Why do you think over 200 advertising companies left Twitter? Why do you think Dick Durbin tried to block Marsha Blackburn requests for Jeffrey Epstein Blackbook? You do not think these people will try to escape through boats, trains, planes, submarines, or even underground tunnels? You think they didn't get the news that their names are about to be shared for the world to see? Can you guess the people who is on the run? Everything mentioned about shutdowns are for them. The same thing Vladimir Putin didin Ukraine. Why would you expect the same source of media or the family & friends who were clueless about all the things you discovered here and then use these same sources to confirm what is going on with Europe/London? Are you serious right now? You might as well go follow their page if that is the straw that broke my back on whether or not I am telling you the truth about anything else going forward sense they seem to know what's going on. People I am not obligated to share anything here. I will be surprised if I am here after January. Aside from that do you know what 2024 will mean for this entire operation? Go look up the missing explosives. Go look up the emergency phones given to congress. Go look up the secret exercises that went on in Washington DC. You think these people are not preparing to play their last hand? This is life & death. There is nothing else waiting for them but a noose. Why in the world would I lie about something of this magnitude? Some of you all follow me for no reason other than entertainment. I call you surfers. Going from channel to channel and not really researching & studying anything. Anyway let me get off this soapbox. I got shit to do.

Saved - January 21, 2024 at 9:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the mainstream recognition of President Trump as a wartime leader and the potential consequences of this. They highlight a documentary that gained significant views and emphasize the seriousness of the situation. The posts also address the categorization of articles as opinion pieces and clarify that it does not diminish their factual accuracy.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨The Under Current: Now Mainstream News "The Current Wartime President Trump is our Retribution for High Treason and Democide by corrupt rogue government element, WHO — This is the total Obliteration of the globalist Deep State" End qoute. https://huffmag.com/pascal-najadi-global-us-military-operation-storm-reality-in-2024/

Pascal Najadi "Global US Military Operation #STORM reality in 2024"  The Current Wartime President Trump is our Retribution for High Treason and Democide by corrupt rogue government element, WHO - This is the huffmag.com

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

How many times have you all been told EO 13912 made Donald Trump a Wartime president? "All Humans reading this disclosure should be prepared for an unprecedented shock period. It is crucial to trust our military, as they are now the Guardians tasked with restoring law and order and protecting our respective Constitutions. The aftermath of this Democide will bring about a completely new way of life, for which words fail to adequately describe the magnitude. However, the film produced and released on October 19th, in collaboration with Dr. Astrid Stückelberger, a loyal compatriot and friend from Switzerland, has become one of the fastest-growing Documentary shorts in terms of view count. Since its release, it has garnered over 500 million views, a testament to its impact". End quote. People this is from mainstream news. Did you know CNBC also published this on their website?

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

This is what you all wanted right? This is what you all said was never going to happen right? This is what you consider alternative news that will never be reported by mainstream news right? Now you understand how serious this is. You actually thought these people were going to walk away? People once something of this nature hit mainstream publications the military is already gearing up for this at anytime given we are still under a national security. https://huffmag.com/pascal-najadi-global-us-military-operation-storm-reality-in-2024/

Pascal Najadi "Global US Military Operation #STORM reality in 2024"  The Current Wartime President Trump is our Retribution for High Treason and Democide by corrupt rogue government element, WHO - This is the huffmag.com

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

And for you who keep saying but it's just an "Opinion Piece". The reason it's posted under that is because If the article includes the author's personal experiences, anecdotes, or reflections, it may be categorized as an opinion piece, even if the broader context is factual. It's really that simple. Editorial teams may categorize articles based on the overall tone or style, even if the content is factually accurate. This is often done to help readers distinguish between straightforward news reporting and pieces that involve more interpretation or analysis. Nothing to do with it being something not official just because it's filed under opinion.

Saved - January 28, 2024 at 12:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Remember when Trump called Pence delusional, Netanyahu a betrayer, and Mcenany a Rino? Don't forget the opposition was once working with Trump. This is a "Live Sting Operation" where crimes continue to be committed for all to see. Trump won't be arresting anyone, but the military will. The border crisis and second lockdowns will be the tipping point. The new economy will emerge during the lockdowns, just like the Federal Reserve absorption and voter fraud in 2020. Space Force technology will stop the Deep State's plans. Dong Jingwei has evidence of CCP's plans and is in protective custody. Search engines are controlled by agencies, making it hard to find information on patriots. Flynn used people like Raiklin to rig elections. Think, it's not hard.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

We Forget So Easily: The Bottom Line Remember when D. Trump called Mike Pence delusional? Remember when D. Trump called Bibi Netanyahu betrayed him? Remember when he D. Trump said he was not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein? Remember when he called Kayleigh Mcenany a Rino? Remember when D. Trump said no cabinet post for Rudy Giuliani in his 2nd administration? Remember when Donald Trump called Bill Barr a coward? Remember when all these people were supposedly working with D. Trump who are now his opposition? Remember when Michael Flynn was invited to a D. Trump rally? Me neither because it never happened for a reason. Why would this be any different for Kash Patel? Why do we have to go over this again? How many times do you all want me to be right once again? How many times do you have to experience betrayal before you understand that you are watching a "Live Sting Operation"? Everyone that has been in your face constantly doing interviews, constantly releasing books, constantly requesting donations, constantly doing documentaries, constantly selling products, are not the people who will be joining you in "The New Republic". Did you all forget what D. Trump said about Michael Flynn? People you need to study what a sting operation is. All of you want D. Trump to be bold and blunt like I am when it comes to ousting opposition out in the open. No, D. Trump wants them to continue committing the crimes so you can see them for who they are. He knows many of you have your hearts open for people that is trying to take D. Trump down. Not to mention that D. Trump is not the one who will be arresting anyone. He signs the documents that allow the military to handle that. Which is called Continuity of Government-(COG). Meaning all of the things you all want to be obvious that will cause chaos & confusion will not be allowed to. This means out in the open (For Now) things have to carry on as normal until it no longer has to once enough of "The Normies" wake up. We are touching on that basis with the Border Crisis. But the tipping point will come once the 2nd lockdowns commence. This will not be what you presume a working plan that will succeed by the Cabal. This is the bridge to the other side I have been telling you all about. Remember, by the time this happens we will be transitioning into the new economy. And under the guise of the lockdowns is when this transformation will take place. No different then what happened in 2020 when the Federal Reserve was absorbed by the US Treasury. Or when all the celebrity homes went up for sale. Or when the voter fraud was occurring that resulted in the water marked ballots catching everyone in the act. Everything during that time was working in your favor. Which is why Donald Trump is able to call his second term "retribution". Because all the work to bring down the Cabal's and their henchmen will finally bare fruit. Especially now since they have all the names of those who were money laundering through Ukraine & Israel. Remember, they now have technology through Space Force to stop 85% of the Deep State plans and objectives. Did you all forget my last post already addressing this? Remember Dong Jingwei? He was given over 1 TB = 75 million pages of evidence containing 20 years of CCPs plans. Which included execution & current infiltration to destroy the U.S including creating the SARS, Covid 19 bioweapons & all companies & people in involved including HRC, weapons trade, money laundering, creating weapons for climate change (Evergreen Ship), U.S. officials. Deep State run military bases, DC and MSM Media. He is currently in protective custody within one of our major Mil intel agencies. This involved Obama, Gates, Fauci, CDC, Biden, WHO, HRC, Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, CIA Rothschilds, Vatican and the Israeli Kazarian Crime Syndicate. Donald Trump has possession of all of this. People you have to understand your search engines for the most part are controlled by the 3 letter agencies. Which is why it's hard to find info on all the people you consider patriots who you think are trying to save the Republic. How many of you would have known Michael Flynn was using people like Ivan Raiklin to rig elections in key states that Joe Biden allegedly won? I. Raiklin is used to blackmail political figures to pressure them to audit votes. Why do you think you couldn't get Michael Flynn to address the 2020 theft? He worked in intelligence for decades so why did it take people who didn't to get to the bottom of what actually happened? Please, think people. It's not a hard thing to do.

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 4:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many individuals selling exclusive information and merchandise under the guise of restoring the Republic are not the true heroes. They have learned this behavior from figures like Michael Flynn, who disavowed Q' but still sells Q' merchandise. The real heroes are quietly doing their jobs and will not mention these paytriot networks when they surface. Stop falling for fake patriotism and performative acts. Release yourself from the constant anticipation and discern who is genuine. Look out for Com-12.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

"Mission Over Merchandise: True Heroes Don't Sell You a Story" The Pay-triots who are constantly attending events requesting donations under the pretense that they have exclusive info (Carrot Dangler) that is some bombshell insider files & documents about some redundant low hanging fruit. (Hunter Biden) That will break the internet that you can only access through their Patreon or some premium subscription services have been selling you the illusion that they are the ones restoring the Republic because you bought their book and took a photo with them and it couldn't be done without your high dollar purchase of their products have sold you out the moment they opened their online store. They learned this grifting from the one and only Michael Flynn who publicly disavowed Q' but still has a store open online selling Q' merchandise. These people have positioned themselves to be the heros of "The New Republic" that none of them will be around to enjoy because the people who are actually responsible for why you will have one do not have anything to sell you. You all keep asking where are the good guys. And I will tell you they are actually doing their jobs. Who are not trying to be in the camera giving you updates about how they are defeating the Cabal. Because when they surface and tell their stories. They will not be mentioning how the "Flynn (Paytriot) Network helped them do it. Why? Because the mission is not over. So stop asking who they are and where they are at. How many interviews are you going to watch? How many books are you going to buy? How many events are you going to attend? How much in donations are you going to continue to give? Before you realize you are following wolves to a dinner where you are the meal? Stop falling for this fake patriotism. All of this performative theatrical mockery of people who are actually on the Frontline as opposed to those dressing up at home doing videos & podcast about how they want you to join a fight that doesn't extend beyond armchair they ate sitting in are not the people saving your country. Release yourself from the constant anticipation that you are about to receive some top shelf groundbreaking soon to be headline news from people who are giving you the illusion that this will be what brings down the temple. And somehow it had alot to do with them because they took a picture with the person who broke the exclusive. You are torturing yourself. You are creating your own disappointment. You are making it harder for yourself to understand why it's not unfolding as you been told. You are not doing the inner work neccessary to discern who is blowing smoke up your @** and who isn't. Look out for Com-12.

Saved - February 9, 2024 at 11:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Q clearance is not a military clearance but is issued by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). It grants access to Top Secret Restricted Data (TSRD) related to nuclear weapons and materials. It is equivalent to a Top Secret DoD security clearance but focuses specifically on nuclear-related secrets. Military personnel involved in DOE nuclear programs can also hold a Q clearance. The Q clearance demonstrates the collaboration between different government agencies in protecting sensitive information. Michael Flynn's lack of knowledge about the Q clearance raises questions about his access to information.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Q Clearance: The Department • Not a Military Security Clearance: While often referred to as a "military clearance," the Q clearance is actually issued by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), not the Department of Defense (DoD). • Access to Restricted Data: It grants individuals access to Top Secret Restricted Data (TSRD) and other sensitive information related to nuclear weapons and materials. • Equivalent to Top Secret: In terms of background investigation and access level, it is considered equivalent to a Top Secret DoD security clearance, but it serves a distinct purpose within the DOE's domain. • Limited Scope: Unlike military clearances, which often cover a broad range of classified information, the Q clearance focuses specifically on nuclear-related secrets. • Strict Requirements: Similar to Top Secret clearances, obtaining a Q clearance involves a thorough single-scope background investigation and adherence to stringent security protocols. Additional Points: Individuals working with nuclear materials or programs within the DOE typically require a Q clearance. While not specifically military personnel, military individuals assigned to tasks involving DOE nuclear programs might also hold a Q clearance. The Q clearance carries significant responsibility and requires ongoing security measures and evaluation. ____________ Q Clearance and the Military: Primary Issuer: The DOE remains the primary issuer of the Q clearance. Military Involvement: Military personnel assigned to tasks involving DOE nuclear programs can also hold a Q clearance alongside their regular military clearance. Not exclusive to military: This clearance isn't solely for military personnel; civilians working with nuclear materials or programs within the DOE also require it. Overlap and Equivalence: Not a Military Clearance: Even with military involvement, the Q clearance retains its distinct nature as a DOE-issued clearance. Equivalent Access Level: However, in terms of access level and background investigation requirements, it holds the same weight as a DoD Top Secret clearance. Limited Scope: Both Q and Top Secret clearances grant access to classified information, but the Q clearance specifically focuses on nuclear-related secrets within the DOE's domain. Conclusion: While not exclusively a military clearance, the Q clearance can involve military personnel in specific situations where their duties intersect with DOE nuclear programs. This demonstrates the interconnectedness of national security and the collaboration between different government agencies in protecting sensitive information. I hope this revised explanation clarifies the relationship between the Q clearance and the military. End. Now wouldn't this sound like something that would be behind the Q-Drops? Now don't you find it strange that Michael Flynn knows nothing about this? Now ask yourself why would he publicly disavowe something that is actually based on a real security sector? Michael Flynn is military right? Michael Flynn is fighting the Deep State right? Michael Flynn knows where all the bodies are buried right? Well why are you getting all the info from me? Wouldn't or shouldn't he be the 1st one to inform you based on data that he supposed to have access to? Those were rhetorical questions again. 😎

Saved - February 14, 2024 at 11:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post discusses the establishment of the military before the formation of the government and clarifies the hierarchy between the military and the federal government. It mentions various laws, executive orders, and codes that support the authority of the military. The concept of Continuity of Government (COG) is explained as a program to ensure the survival of the constitutional government. The post emphasizes that the military's role is to restore law and order. The second post simply says "Follow."

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

For The People In The Back: The Bottom Line Our Founders established a Military 1st, the Army, Navy, and Marines long before Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Military was created first in our Nation. The United States Supreme Court, first time in History, clarified this in the Military Justice Act of 2016. Though it didn’t pass until they went under COG in the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act. There’s 2 Powers in the U.S. 1. Military 2. Federal Government When FG is in COG… that leaves Military in a Military Occupancy found in the Law of War Manual. Issued June 12, 2015, and reissued December 2016. Which means the CIC answers to Military. Whoever it is. People give to much credence to government because they have been fooled into thinking everything starts & stop with the president. The Military Justice Act clarifies 3 things: 1. Military Law supersedes Civilian. 2. President and Commander-in-Chief are separate. 3. Article II of the Constitution, Commander-in-Chief, is separate from Article III, Federal Government. 1. Article II of the Constitution 2. First War Powers Act 3. Second War Powers Act 4. Executive Order 13912 5. Executive Order 13919 6. Executive Order 13963 7. Commonwealth Act 671 8. Military Justice Act 2016 9. 10 United States Code 12406 What is a COG? The Continuity of Government program represents the President's intent that the US have in place a comprehensive & effective program to ensure survival of our constitutional form of government & continuity of essential federal functions under all circumstances. We are a Nation of Laws and Orders. Military Law came 1st. SCOTUS clarified that in the MJA 2016. D. Johnson spoke on this many times. D. Johnson: DJT is not the Former President. By Military & Federal Laws & Orders, he’s CIC under Article II of the Constitution & 1st & 2nd War Powers Act. Executive Order 13912 made him a Wartime President meaning continued until completed. That EO ends in 2024. Obama’s the last Former president. D. Trump is legal CIC via Article II of the Constitution, 1st & 2nd War Powers Act, Law of War Manual, Military Justice Act 2016, Federal Continuity Directives 1 & 2, Stafford Act, National Emergencies Act, Executive Orders: 13825, 13848, 13919, 13963, 13912, & 10 US Codes: 47, 1209, 12406, 12304. COG- A Military Operation which requires a Continuity of Government where the Military and our Allies can operate effectively and efficiently while performing multiple layers and different kinds of missions as well as all these phases that had to be set up and implemented and running effectively and efficiently as well. Do you all understand? Our military is here to restore Law & Order by any means neccessary. There are elements of this operation you have not been told about that would require the suspension of disbelief in order for you to grasp the gravity of this. If you all think this all starts and stop at the arrest of P*dos you are very far behind. So all this whining about government over reach into your liberty & freedom is asinine. You are not even under a government currently or legally. You are under military codes of law under COG/JAG. Darce E. Crandall has been tasked with overseeing the Military Tribunals. And I bet his favorite one was Hillary Clinton. Enjoy the rest of your day.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Follow https://t.me/rattletrap1776

RattleTrap 1776 🇺🇸 Service beyond service 🇺🇸 www.rattletrap1776.com www.thedocuments.info www.derekjohnsoncountry.com t.me
Saved - March 17, 2024 at 1:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Accounts in "The Flynn Network" tried to set up MAGA patriots at the border. Government agencies like the FBI and CIA have used false flag scenarios in the past, such as Waco and Oklahoma bombings. Alex Jones and his circle were involved. Green Beret and Navy Seals are at the border to prevent another false flag. The right is trying to use MAGA to remove Trump. Corruption, vaccines, climate change, and the Epstein saga may implicate the DNC, CIA, and FBI. Robert F. Kennedy has questionable actions and motives. The US government planned to overthrow several Middle Eastern countries to maintain oil money and the fiat system. The emergence of the BRICS Nations disrupted their plans.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

"Navigating the Shadows: Unraveling Conspiracies and Political Maneuvering" Please never forget the accounts or the ones in "The Flynn Network" that tried to push MAGA patriots to go to the border. They were trying to set you all up because J-6 didn't work the way they intended. It's been revealed that particular gov- alphabet agencies, including the FBI and CIA, have employed PATCOM ops in the past to organize false flag scenarios and place the blame on Americans. Such as the tragic Waco and Oklahoma bombings incidents. We know the CIA was behind both. Alex Jones circle was definitely involved. These people use your patriotism to target D. Trump so the media which is their liberal weapon tool to ensure the general public are brainwashed into thinking there was really a insurrection. We have Green Beret & Navy Seals at the border. To ensure no hanky panky is being done to stage another false flag. Never forget the accounts on this platform they were pushing for people to go out there. You all were about to fall for another set up. Everything going on right now on the right is them trying to figure out how to use MAGA to get D. Trump out of the way. So please understand and do not fall for the next trap. This year is anticipation is building where we witness exposure related to corruption tied to UN initiatives, vaccines, climate change narratives, and high-profile scandals like the Epstein saga, potentially implicating DNC, CIA, and FBI. Do you all remember when Robert F. Kennedy was supporting putting people in jail who opposed the global warming agenda? Do you all remember when he supported genocide in Gaza? Do you all wonder why he is posing going after big pharma but if it were not for the court files we would have never known about his flight on the Lolita express? But this is the guy running for office? I bet Steve Bannon was the one who put him up to it. You know what else is funny? Robert F. Kennedy also wanted to back the USD with Bitcoin. Do you know how retarded you have to be to back fiat with fiat and actual think it's a good idea? This is why he doesn't want to directly run against D. Trump. He only settles for the little jabs he can throw by reposting his content from TruthSocial and spinning it to tarnish his image by coming off as the more sensible of the two. Even though we knew Donald Trump was quoting Joe Biden on the vaccine during the SOTU. Robert F. Kennedy used it to taint the image of CIC. I remember when Army General Wesley Clark mentioned back in 2001 from a clip I saw in 2015 that the US government wanted to overthrow the middle east. 1) Iraq 2) Libya 3) Syria 4) Lebanon 5) Somalia 6) Sudan 7) Iran These were the regions selected that they wanted to change within five years. Why? To ensure that oil money never dries up. Because that is how they keep the fiat system alive. They would make those countries denominate all their trade deals in fiat USD. Which is another reason their gold was stolen. Basically making sure that these regions never become self sufficient by tapping into their natural resources to support their native currency. They never thought something like the BRICS Nations would surface in the manner it has. Because the older version of this plan for the BRICS was going to more than likely support the NWO in the 1st draft plans. It was never going to include the gold standard.

Saved - April 21, 2024 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author, @DecentFiJC, addresses the FBI and K2, expressing their determination to hold them accountable. They mock Forest Rogers, referring to them as a "Secret Keeper" and questioning their competence. The author finds unraveling their deception boring and urges them to grow some dignity. They express a desire for those involved to face severe consequences for betraying their country.

@Theonlyme333 - Theonlymethereis

Attn:@K2theSky @SeditionHunters @DecentFiJC from beyond the ban Original post from TS @ https://truthsocial.com/@DecentFiJC/112304391120927193 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 FBI (MOSSAD) and K2: You have BIG Fvcking problems. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 *Not the least of which is me being a total fvcking genius who can't/won't stop owning your traitorous punk asses until ALL OF YOU are held accountable. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Get a load of Forest Roger's here, sports fans 🤣 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 "Secret Keeper", eh? 🤦‍♂️ 💥Question: Are y'all purposely trying to give the game away, or are you just a buncha spook-flunkie retards who enjoy getting paid to act out some Family Dollar Kingsmen LARP? I mean, unwinding all your BS isn't even fun or interesting for me anymore. At this point, it's just boring, predictable and ghey. My God, grow some dignity, folks. (You're basically the mall-cop of the spook universe.) 💥PS: I hope all of you h@ng. It's what you deserve for Waging War against your fellow countrymen on behalf of FOREIGN agencies. But I'll settle for life imprisonment for those who cooperate with us and plead down. #TheNoticing

Jonathan (@DecentFiJC) 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥FBI (MOSSAD) and K2: This is my SECOND attempt to post this. I’d REALLY hate for any of you to miss it.✌️😒💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥#TheNoticingContinues #TheNoticingExplodes truthsocial.com
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 2:34 PM

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

What the hell?

@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr. 

More video has surfaced showing people yelling at the police and Secret Service trying to get them to stop the assassination attempt of President Trump. We may need to come to terms with the fact that the rank-and-file police and agents were in on this too. https://t.co/C6Wn7k4paO

Video Transcript AI Summary
They are all pointing at someone on the roof, who is laying down. There are dangerous people and criminals in our country who should not be here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. They're all pointing. Yeah. They they they Yeah. Yeah. Someone's on top of the roof. Look. There he is right there. Yeah. Right there. See him? He's laying down. See him? Yeah. He's laying down. What's happening? Yeah. Look. Here he is. Because we have millions and millions of people in our country that should be here. Dangerous people. Criminals.
Saved - September 22, 2024 at 12:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there was no Pentagon screw-up regarding the National Guard deployment on January 6; it was a coordinated effort involving Milley, Pelosi, and DOD officials to avoid extra security. The narrative about "optics" seems like an excuse. Watching the J6 footage reinforces my view that if guardsmen had been present, the chaos could have been prevented. Claims of a simple chain of command failure are misleading; it feels intentional. Additionally, Milley's involvement in a political statement shortly after the event raises further concerns about his actions that day.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Guys, there was no Pentagon screw up related to deployment of National Guard on Jan 6. The “optics” excuse was just that—an excuse to justify why guardsmen were not deployed. This was a coordinated effort between Milley, Pelosi, and DOD officials to prevent extra security that day. Are we truly supposed to believe Trump-hating subversives in the government worried about “optics” or honoring boundaries between law enforcement and the military? Mark Milley? Seriously? I was watching more J6 video this morning and again thinking that had a few thousand guardsmen been present at the Capitol—none of the mayhem would’ve happened. Which is the point. We are supposed to believe that Pelosi’s sergeant at arms AND McConnell’s sergeant at arms AND Army Sec Ryan McCarthy were basically unreachable that afternoon as calls for help poured in? Do not believe any analysis claiming this was just a chain of command failure or typical government power struggle. It was not. It was intentional and represents perhaps the most sinister aspect of January 6.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Milley’s dirty traitorous fingerprints are all over Jan 6 Look at this statement he organized and published on January 13, 2021. Completely political and subversive. https://t.co/sOKV5UOStb

Saved - September 26, 2024 at 12:23 PM

@Saritaregresa - Saritaderegreso

It's not our government. Biden is compromised. Who knows which country was highest bidder. The news showed you closeups of maybe 150 of 700,000 protesters that got out of hand. It's not like nothing happened, it's just not the whole story. Does this look like an insurrection? 👇

Saved - January 7, 2025 at 6:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I raised some intriguing questions for Elon Musk regarding connections between key figures and events surrounding 9/11. I pointed out George Tenet's appointment of Alvin Krongard to the CIA shortly before the attacks and noted the suspicious purchase of puts on American Airlines stock by Alex. Brown. I also highlighted Howard Krongard's misleading testimony, John M. Tenet's ties to defense contracting and Palantir, and Ozi Amant's involvement in financing Palantir. Lastly, I mentioned the communication methods used by certain individuals during the January 6 events.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

8VC: Yo, @elonmusk! Have you ever inquired as to why George Tenet appointed Alvin Krongard from Alex. Brown and Iridium to be the #3 guy at the CIA, just 6 months before 9/11? *FUN FACT: That’s also around the time when Eric Schmidt became the CEO of Google. And have you inquired as to why Alex. Brown bought 95% of all the puts on American Airlines stock on September 6, 2001? And why Howard Krongard, the OIG of the STATE DEPT., lied under oath about 9/11 and how his brother, Alvin, sat on the Board of Directors of Blackwater? And why George Tenet’s son, John M. Tenet, is a huge financier of Palantir, while also being a huge defense/drone contractor with his companies like CHAOS and EPIRUS? And why OZI AMANT, a huge SINGAPORE EXCHANGE FRAUDSTER from K2 GLOBAL and close associate of THOMAS ZILLIACUS, is also one of the earliest financiers of Palantir? And why “Paytriots” within the crowd at J6 were communicating on IRIDIUM SAT PHONES. You should probably do all that. Before we Whites have finally had enough and seek other means of redress. Just FYI.✌️🇺🇸🫡

Saved - July 24, 2025 at 7:20 AM

@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙

I can understand the people who say, “NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO THEM🤬!” This time is different BECAUSE HE CAUGHT THEM ALL🫨! I’m 43,689 to 0 with my conspiracy theories SO JUST CHILL OUT AND LET IT PLAY OUT👊! https://t.co/2MrkVGmeAN

Saved - September 24, 2025 at 4:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been expressing my concerns about what I see as a coordinated attack on white, non-Jewish Americans and our rights. I believe there’s a collusion among various intelligence agencies and foreign entities aiming to undermine our nation. I’ve called out specific individuals and organizations for their roles in this perceived threat, including connections to significant events like 9/11 and the COVID pandemic. I’m open to discussing these issues face-to-face, as I feel strongly about defending our constitutional rights against what I view as treasonous actions.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@FBI @FBIDirectorKash @ADL @RAND, 🚨PRO TIP: If you have an issue with WHITE, NON-JEW AMERICANS AND CHRISTIANS like ME opposing BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION 2… aka, the ATTEMPTED GENOCIDE OF WHITE AMERICANS and HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF AMERICA by FOREIGN ENEMIES, that’s currently happening in the UNITED STATES via collusion between the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS and ISRAELI AND BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND MILITARY PERSONNEL, then come see ME. Let’s talk about it FACE-TO-FACE. I trust you still know where I live since your last visit. And if you really ARE about upholding your oaths to DEFEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, as opposed to being “BROWN SHIRTS” for these ANTI-AMERICAN “Global Jewry” infil-traitors that Solzhenitsyn described, then I’d WELCOME such a conversation. Do you? If so, WHY TF are you showing up at the HOMES of my FRIENDS asking THEM to come down to the FBI FIELD OFFICE to discuss “INTERNET THREATS”? Did you expect us, the WHITE, CHRISTIAN AMERICANS whose ANCESTORS FOUNDED THIS COUNTRY, to just SIT QUIETLY while ISRAELI/BRITISH/UKRAINIAN/GLOBAL JEWRY TERRORISTS attempt to STEAL OUR COUNTRY and EXTERMINATE OUR RACE? Was that REALLY your logical thought process? The U.S. Constitution mandates AMERICAN CITIZENS not only have a RIGHT to oppose such hostile measures against Americans, we have the OBLIGATION to oppose it… and use DEADLY FORCE if necessary, should all peaceful means of recourse be exhausted. And unfortunately for YOU, we BOTH know I have ALL the receipts of your DIRECT INVOLVEMENT in that operation. And I SHARE THEM FOR ALL TO SEE… which is why you have your dutiful little UNIT 8200 HALL MONITORS CONSTANTLY NUKING MY ACCOUNTS. YOU. WILL. NOT. SILENCE. LAW-ABIDING. AMERICAN. PATRIOTS. AS. YOUR. TRY. TO. TAKE. EVERYTHING. FROM. THEM. Cope.

@CityBureaucrat - Second City Bureaucrat

Here's your REMINDER that the RAND Corp warned against designating antifa as a terrorist organization. Pay attention. https://t.co/OfTEJRQZO3

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

🚨NOTE: I’m sorry @ADL TREASURER, ROB STAVIS, is almost CERTAINLY a 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATOR from SALOMON SMITH BARNEY and a KROLL BOND RATINGS AGENCY INVESTOR, but that’s NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM. I didn’t MAKE you commit ACTS OF TERRORISM against the UNITED STATES, or MURDER damn near 3,000 INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS with your GLOBAL JEWRY and CCP-tied CO-CONSPIRATORS from PAYPAL MAFIA. YOU made POOR DECISIONS. YOU have now been CAUGHT. And YOU will endure the CONSEQUENCES of those decisions. *Feel free to call/text ME to discuss further. Have a GREAT rest of your day. Cheers. PS: Do tell all the TIDES FOUNDATION peeps hello for me. Especially JASON WINGARD and ANUCHA BROWNE, since they represent COLUMBIA, UPENN, BLACKWATER, KROLL, THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, NATO, CARLYLE GROUP, ROTHSCHILDS, IN-Q-TEL/CIA, ASPEN INSTITUTE, DUFF & PHELPS, FOCUS FINANCIAL PARTNERS, NOAH GOTTDIENER, ADL, ACLU, UJA/JFNA/Mossad, JERRY SPEYER, MARC ROWAN, LEON/COFER BLACK, APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, the UN and the BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@ADL *AS. YOU. TRY. https://t.co/fJ3WWQhyDu

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

🚨UPDATE: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY and the ADL (B’NAI B’RITH/MOSSAD) even have a PARTNERSHIP LAB too! How NEAT! And the PRESIDENT of ARIZONA STATE, MICHAEL CROW, just so happens to be the CHAIRMAN of IN-Q-TEL (CIA), the VENTURE CAPITAL ARM of our CIA as well! Gosh, it feels like all these connections SUZANNE NORA JOHNSON has to MICHAEL CROW, to IN-Q-TEL (CIA), to ARIZONA STATE, to COVID, to PFIZER, to AIG (UnitedHealth/Optum/CCP/Kroll), to the BILDERBERG STEERING COMMITTEE, to GOLDMAN SACHS (Atlantic Council), to RAND CORP (MK-ULTRA, 9/11, AMERICAN IRON FRONT/ISRAELI & BRITISH INTEL/KROLL/ANTIFA/ADL/ACLU/SPLC), to MCCAIN INSTITUTE (Rothschild/WEF/UN/BlackRock/UJA/Israel), to MOSSAD, to BROOKINGS INSTITUTION and to MARKLE FOUNDATION… aka, the ROCKEFELLER POPULATION COUNCIL (global depopulation agenda), which entails the COVID crew - NIH/Ford Fdn/Rockefeller Fdn/Markle Fdn/etc… might come back to BITE these fgts once and for all in the end. (So much Kleiner Perkins, Sequoia Capital, Sun Microsystems, Google, Khosla, CCP, Clinton Global Initiative, PayPal Mafia, Botha, Bechtolsheim, Golub, Qualcomm, Lightspeed, Duke Capital Partners, Silver Lake, Y Combinator, Li Ka Shing, Richard Li and ActBlue/WinRed littered throughout.) Especially when we remember MICHAEL CROW is also a TRUSTEE of MCCAIN INSTITUTE, right alongside THESE peeps… 👺AMBASSADOR JOSETTE SHEERAN *WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, Vice Chairman *UN WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME, Executive Director *MCCAIN INSTITUTE, Founding Trustee 👺LYNN FORESTER DE ROTHSCHILD *INCLUSIVE CAPITAL PARTNERS, Founder & Managing Partner *TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY (CCP/Kirk Murder) *BRONFMAN-ROTHSCHILD (TPUSA/Kirk Murder) *CHATHAM HOUSE, Member *COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Member *PIIE, Executive Committee *U.S. SECRETARY OF ENERGY ADVISORY BOARD, President Clinton *NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY COMMITTEE *WORLD BANK *TEMASEK (Singapore Gov’t/COVID) *MCCAIN INSTITUTE, Trustee 👺HARRY SLOAN *MGM STUDIOS, Chairman & CEO *GINKGO BIOWORKS (Palantir/Moderna/CIA/Baillie Gifford/Israel/NTI), Trustee *EAGLE EQUITY PARTNERS II, Chairman & CEO *MCCAIN INSTITUTE, Trustee 👺GENERAL DAVID H. PETRAEUS *CIA, Director *KKR GLOBAL INSTITUTE (Operation Timber Sycamore weapons trafficking under Obama), Director *KKR, Partner *SEMPERIS (KKR/Israel), Strategic Advisor *MCCAIN INSTITUTE, Trustee *MCCAIN GLOBAL LEADERS COUNCIL* 👺H.R. MCMASTER *U.S. CENTCOMM *GENERAL DAVID H. PETRAEUS, Top Counterinsurgency Advisor *FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES (CIA/Mossad) “CENTER ON MILITARY AND POLITICAL POWER”, Chairman of the Board of Advisors 💥FUN FACT: JOHN BARSA, from USAID and THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, is ALSO a TRUSTEE of the MCCAIN INSTITUTE. Small world, folks. Real fucking small.😒 Boy, get a load of THESE incredibly fucking inconvenient receipts, sports fans.👇🤬

@Jewels139o14 - Jewels1984

https://t.co/3ufsHCBkds

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

It’s a shame I even have to ask, but is this real or satire, @VoxExVeritas? If it’s real, it’s important to archive it for posterity. https://t.co/KXWhSpK8PW

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

Just a few more tidbits. Almost forgot to mention DAVID H. PETRAEUS is also involved with TRILATERAL COMMISSION and the U.S.-INDIA STRATEGIC POLICY FORUM (USISPF), where these TRAITOROUS FUCKING JEWS, and their INDIAN COLLEAGUES DELIBERATELY and ILLEGALLY EXPLOIT our H1B VISAS PROGRAM to FRAUDULENTLY OFFSHORE JOBS TO INDIA, KEEPING THEM OUT OF THE HANDS of WELL-QUALIFIED WHITE AMERICAN MALES in the UNITED STATES. 🚨NOTE: This is especially true for HIGHLY SOUGHT-AFTER JOBS, but it ALSO includes ENTRY-LEVEL BASIC PROGRAMMING AND TECH BULLSHIT TOO. It’s NOT JUST about MAXIMIZING PROFITS for these traitors… it’s about COMMITTING SOCIOECONOMIC GENOCIDE of WHITE, PROTESTANT NON-JEW AMERICAN MEN… the PATRIOTS who FOUNDED THIS FUCKING COUNTRY. (Fuck. These. Traitorous. Fgts.🖕) Golly jeepers, I’m sure all these similarly-timed AIG, HAKLUYT (East India Company), SEMPERIS, MARSH MCLENNAN and BALLISTIC VENTURES “cybersecurity hires” horseshit is to SOLELY to protect the best interests of American citizens, folks. I know it might LOOK terrible, but TRUST ME, it’s TOTALLY not to ENSURE KEY ELECTIONS OUTCOMES, MANIPULATE FINANCIAL MARKETS AND GLOBAL RESOURCES and AVOID ACCOUNTABILITY for 9/11, COVID, PANDEMIC RESPONSE, SVB, 2008/2009 HOUSING CRISIS, RIGGING THE 1998-2001 TECH BUBBLE, LOOTING MEDICARE/MEDICAID POOLS, COMMITTING AI-PROGRAMMED HEALTH/MEDICAL INSURANCE FRAUD AND MURDERING PATIENTS, COMMITTING ESPIONAGE AND DOMESTIC TERRORISM AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS and to protect the ILL-GOTTEN (STOLEN) WEALTH of these TREASONOUS JEW TERRORISTS, FINANCIAL FRAUDSTERS, HOLOCAUST HOAX MERCHANTS, COVID ETHNIC BIOTERRORISTS, GAZA/WEST BANK GENOCIDERS and CCP COLLABORATORS like… …the fgts at AIG (Maurice/Jeffrey Greenberg), KKR (Kravis/Bilderberg), UnitedHealth (Optum/UJA/Perseus/MDI Health/Anthem/Ballard/McKinsey & Co./BCBS AZ/etc.), Hakluyt (GCHQ/Sesame Workshop/Cranemere Group/Jeff Zients/Tom Nides/Duke Kunshan/Blackstone Group/Tsinghua University), The Partnership for NYC (Speyer/Kravis/Carlyle/Palantir/Bourla/etc.) and pretty much EVERY FUCKING TRUSTEE AT NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

Oh, one more thing… This MCMASTER fgt is ALSO a “DiStInGuIsHeD vIsItInG fElLoW” at ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY too. Huh. And before I go, please let me clarify… No, I DIDN’T forget about ISRAELI B’NAI B’RITH VACCINE/COVID TERRORIST, PETER HOTEZ, sitting in bed with LOEWS CORP (Tisch/UJA/Mount Sinai/Gilead/Remdesivir) and literally the ISRAELI FUCKING GOVERNMENT (U.S.-ISRAEL BSL) since 2018. And no, I didn’t overlook DEBORAH BIRX sitting on the PALANTIR GOVERNMENT ADVISORY BOARD now either, despite BIRX BEING COPIED ON THOSE SAME REMDESIVIR/HCQ EMAILS from MARCH 2020 THAT PALANTIR HELPED COVER UP! And she/they did it so that PALANTIR and its treasonous ZIO/SOVIET/BOLSHEVIK JEWRY PE INVESTORS and all the JEW COVID BIOTERRORISTS could CRAFT a FRAUDULENT “LEGAL LIABILITY SHIELD” EUA to FURTHER INSULATE THEMSELVES FROM ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE GLOBAL EUGENICS OPERATION THEIR MOSSAD COLLEAGUES were carrying out (against the WHITE, EUROPEAN RACE). Meanwhile, it further allowed them to REALIZE PROFITS from SHITTY GILEAD (REMDESIVIR) TOXINS and execute a MODERNA “MRNA VACCINES OPTIMIZATION” CONTRACT that GINKGO BIOWORKS (PALANTIR/CIA/AIG/BAILLIE GIFFORD) got thanks to GINKGO BIOWORKS CHAIRMAN, SHYAM SANKAR, also being the EVP & COO of motherfucking PALANTIR. Come see me ANYTIME you’d care to discuss ANY/ALL of this fucking horseshit, or ANYTHING you deem a “THREAT”. TIA.✌️ PS: I see your punk ass too, UBER. Get fucked.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@ADL Yeah, you bet your ass these are linked.🖕

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@LeoTerrellDOJ, I’ll go ahead and warn you, your @DOJCrimDiv CO-CONSPIRATORS and ALL OF YOUR FUCKING “PROJECT ESTHER”, UJA/MOSSAD, NATO and COVID BIOTERRORIST PAYMASTERS from CARLYLE GROUP, VAN ANDEL INSTITUTE, ALTICOR, THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, AMWAY, TYCO, NEWMARK, CANTOR FITZGERALD, GM, APCO, CJP, JOHNSON CONTROLS and GINKGO/PALANTIR: We’ve already established networks and comms, Leo. So please listen carefully. If you think for a FUCKING SECOND you’re gonna be sending AMERICAN TAXPAYER-FUNDED “LAW ENFORCEMENT” out to be your “BROWN SHIRTS”, ARREST AMERICAN FUCKING CITIZENS AND THEN CHARGE THEM WITH TERRORISM for EXERCISING THEIR 1A-PROTECTED GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH, on behalf of motherfucking LIKUD, MOSSAD, UNIT 8200, UNIT 217 “DUVDEVAN”, UNIT 262 “SAYERET MATKAL”, CIA, the U.S. STATE DEPT (Blackstone Group/Israel), 9/11 ATTACKERS AND COVID BIOTERRORISTS, you’re COMPLETELY fucking DELUSIONAL. And ANY officers who would even ATTEMPT to make such TREASONOUS, ABSURDLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL ARRESTS of AMERICAN CITIZENS AT THE BEHEST OF SOME HOSTILE, PEDO-HAVEN FOREIGN NATION, TO PROTECT ITS GENOCIDAL LUNATICS AND TERRORIST OPERATIVES, run a HIGH RISK of NEVER MAKING IT HOME.

@LeoTerrellDOJ - Leo Terrell

I’m going to go ahead and say it. If you chant “Free Palestine” and “From the River to the Sea”, you support homicidal maniacs. There is freedom of speech in our country. But ask yourself why you want to be here if you hate our country and our biggest ally so much.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@ADL Check that — now it’s known “Israeli-compromised asset”, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

*AMI SHAFRIR* The Israeli pornographer and infamous “Con Inc Media” talent agent of Presler, Owens, Boebert, etc. Apparently he is who compromised LT. GEN. H.R. MCMASTER. Yiiikes.😳 It seems SHELDON ADELSON (Mr. Miriam Adelson) was “upset” by LIEUTENANT GENERAL H.R. MCMASTER’S “INSUFFICIENT SUPPORT OF ISRAEL”, so ADELSON and ROBERT MERCER had SHAFRIR send over two of his operatives, ANNA KHAIT AND TARA PRICE, to go “SEDUCE AND BLACKMAIL” MCMASTER. And now McMaster is one of the gravest NatSec threats to the United States, involved with McCain Institute, Smith Richardson Foundation, Atlantic Council, Arizona State University, Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (CIA/Mossad) and he even sits on the Board of Directors of ZOOM (Unit 8200). QUESTION: Why do we allow people who try to BLACKMAIL HIGH-RANKING U.S. INTEL/MILITARY PERSONNEL to live freely among us?

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@ADL Lol

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

*BRONFMAN-ROTHSCHILD* What do you Notice™️, folks?😒 https://t.co/uZ7I7iL4oj

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@VeryPopularSOB @FBI @FBIDirectorKash @ADL @rand Your boy just removed me from the space you’re in. I was gonna tell you I hit “post” 12 minutes ago and I’m still waiting for the post to finally upload on the feed. Needless to say, they don’t/won’t like it.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@Driftwo0131189 @FBI @FBIDirectorKash @ADL @rand Thank you for the kind words, brother. Really appreciate you.🙏🏼😎

Saved - September 22, 2025 at 5:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed strong opposition to perceived threats against white, non-Jewish Americans, alleging a conspiracy involving various intelligence agencies and foreign entities. They invited officials to discuss these concerns in person and criticized actions taken against their associates regarding alleged internet threats. The user claimed to possess evidence of involvement in a broader conspiracy and warned against attempts to silence American patriots. They also made accusations against specific individuals and organizations related to terrorism and global influence.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@FBI @FBIDirectorKash @ADL @RAND, 🚨PRO TIP: If you have an issue with WHITE, NON-JEW AMERICANS AND CHRISTIANS like ME opposing BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION 2… aka, the ATTEMPTED GENOCIDE OF WHITE AMERICANS and HOSTILE TAKEOVER OF AMERICA by FOREIGN ENEMIES, that’s currently happening in the UNITED STATES via collusion between the CIA, NSA, FBI, DHS and ISRAELI AND BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES AND MILITARY PERSONNEL, then come see ME. Let’s talk about it FACE-TO-FACE. I trust you still know where I live since your last visit. And if you really ARE about upholding your oaths to DEFEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, as opposed to being “BROWN SHIRTS” for these ANTI-AMERICAN “Global Jewry” infil-traitors that Solzhenitsyn described, then I’d WELCOME such a conversation. Do you? If so, WHY TF are you showing up at the HOMES of my FRIENDS asking THEM to come down to the FBI FIELD OFFICE to discuss “INTERNET THREATS”? Did you expect us, the WHITE, CHRISTIAN AMERICANS whose ANCESTORS FOUNDED THIS COUNTRY, to just SIT QUIETLY while ISRAELI/BRITISH/UKRAINIAN/GLOBAL JEWRY TERRORISTS attempt to STEAL OUR COUNTRY and EXTERMINATE OUR RACE? Was that REALLY your logical thought process? The U.S. Constitution mandates AMERICAN CITIZENS not only have a RIGHT to oppose such hostile measures against Americans, we have the OBLIGATION to oppose it… and use DEADLY FORCE if necessary, should all peaceful means of recourse be exhausted. And unfortunately for YOU, we BOTH know I have ALL the receipts of your DIRECT INVOLVEMENT in that operation. And I SHARE THEM FOR ALL TO SEE… which is why you have your dutiful little UNIT 8200 HALL MONITORS CONSTANTLY NUKING MY ACCOUNTS. YOU. WILL. NOT. SILENCE. LAW-ABIDING. AMERICAN. PATRIOTS. AS. YOUR. TRY. TO. TAKE. EVERYTHING. FROM. THEM. Cope.

@CityBureaucrat - Second City Bureaucrat

Here's your REMINDER that the RAND Corp warned against designating antifa as a terrorist organization. Pay attention. https://t.co/OfTEJRQZO3

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

🚨NOTE: I’m sorry @ADL TREASURER, ROB STAVIS, is almost CERTAINLY a 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATOR from SALOMON SMITH BARNEY and a KROLL BOND RATINGS AGENCY INVESTOR, but that’s NOT MY FUCKING PROBLEM. I didn’t MAKE you commit ACTS OF TERRORISM against the UNITED STATES, or MURDER damn near 3,000 INNOCENT AMERICAN CITIZENS with your GLOBAL JEWRY and CCP-tied CO-CONSPIRATORS from PAYPAL MAFIA. YOU made POOR DECISIONS. YOU have now been CAUGHT. And YOU will endure the CONSEQUENCES of those decisions. *Feel free to call/text ME to discuss further. Have a GREAT rest of your day. Cheers. PS: Do tell all the TIDES FOUNDATION peeps hello for me. Especially JASON WINGARD and ANUCHA BROWNE, since they represent COLUMBIA, UPENN, BLACKWATER, KROLL, THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION, NATO, CARLYLE GROUP, ROTHSCHILDS, IN-Q-TEL/CIA, ASPEN INSTITUTE, DUFF & PHELPS, FOCUS FINANCIAL PARTNERS, NOAH GOTTDIENER, ADL, ACLU, UJA/JFNA/Mossad, JERRY SPEYER, MARC ROWAN, LEON/COFER BLACK, APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, the UN and the BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION.

@DebiLuvzGold - Debi Gold

@ADL *AS. YOU. TRY. https://t.co/fJ3WWQhyDu

Saved - October 14, 2025 at 4:38 AM

@MaxNard0 - Max Nardo

SPOILERS: If you betray 350MM of the most well-armed citizens in human history by campaigning on justice, but then cast your lot with those who targeted them w/bioweapons & vaccine eugenics just 4-5 years earlier, you have no reasonable expectation to “feel safe” in that country.

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

🚨 JUST IN: Actress Cheryl Hines says she’s “VERY WORRIED” about her husband, RFK Jr’s SAFETY 🚨 https://t.co/QyeHuTOZsz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy family was easy to you. I think you're the only one That would ever say that. You then, all of a sudden, get swept up into this Republican administration. Was not. Was not. So how did that come about? What was the conversation? Well, when you read my book Unscripted Know, President Trump and Bobby have a lot in common, and they have very similar goals. When they got together, they decided, yeah, we should work together. Then suddenly, suddenly, Bobby is now in the middle of a Republican administration. He is in pink. Right? The new movement to be MAHA and to be healthy and to make America healthy again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kennedy family was easy to you. I think you're the only one Speaker 1: That would ever say that. Speaker 0: That would ever say that. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: You then, all of a sudden, get swept up into this Republican administration. Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Speaker 0: And you weren't expecting that. Speaker 1: Was not. Was not. Speaker 0: So how did that come about? What was the conversation? Speaker 1: Well, when you read my book Unscripted Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Did you like that? Speaker 0: Very good. Speaker 1: Know, President Trump and Bobby have a lot in common, and they have very similar goals. When they got together, they decided, yeah, we should work together. Then suddenly, suddenly, Bobby is now in the middle of a Republican administration. Speaker 0: He's in the middle of it all. Speaker 1: He is in pink. Right? Speaker 0: Right in the thick of it. Do you ever elbow him and say, what are you doing? I don't agree with that. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. I do. I'll say, what what what wait. Why did you say that? And then we'll have a moment, and and then a lot of times we'll agree to disagree, or we'll say, okay, I'm gonna think about what you just said. I'll let you know if I take the note or not. Speaker 0: The new movement to be MAHA and to be healthy and to make America healthy again. Yeah. Is this kind of important to you? Do you work out constantly? Do you make sure that everything's perfect? Speaker 1: No. No to I don't make sure everything's perfect, but I do think it's a lifestyle, and I think I live a healthy lifestyle. So for me, it's less about every tiny little thing. For me, it's like, I don't work out every day. I could lie and say I do, but I don't. Speaker 0: No one's ever lied on this show before. Speaker 1: I work out every day. And but, you know, overall, going through the days, you're trying to make the healthiest choices, and you're trying to do what's best for your body to to keep you healthy. That's that's basically it. And then it's so amazing to have Bobby leading this MAHA movement where you're watching some of the things that he's accomplished, like getting rid of petroleum, based dyes in food, getting rid of ingredients in our food that other countries don't allow, looking at baby formula and getting rid of the arsenic and the lead that's in it. So when you see some of these accomplishments, it just first of all, you wonder why it it's all like this to begin with. But, second of all, I'm really proud that Bobby's the the person leading the charge.
Saved - January 31, 2026 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the Epstein files reveal material larger than abuse videos involving the powerful, framed as an operation rather than a scandal. It asks who leads organ trafficking, safe havens for Pdfiles, Epstein’s employers, and Lev Tahor’s scale. It notes surveillance can find Osama but not missing kids, suggesting deep power protection. It questions why this truth is released now and why society isn’t rising as a result.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

The Epstein files describe material so extreme it goes beyond "abuse" videos involving the world's most powerful men and women. This wasn't a scandal. It was an operation. • What country leads the world in organ trafficking? • What country is a safe haven for Pdfiles? • What country did Epstein work for? • Jewish sect Lev Tahor is one of if not the "biggest" trafficking operations globally in terms of overall scale or volume of victims compared to major international trafficking rings” Is amazing how they can use surveillance and satellites to help find Osama bin Laden through a window capturing his shadow, but they can’t use one of those surveillance satellites to help locate millions of missing kids. Because they don’t care. And the reason the truth feels unreal is because it exposes how deep power is willing to sink and how long it has been protected. They kept this from you for years, why? Why release it now? In a normal society, this would be reason for another insurrection or worse but we don’t live in a normal society.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that more than 3,000,000 pages, including more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, were produced, totaling approximately three and a half million pages in compliance with the act. The 2,000 videos and 180,000 images are not all videos and images taken by Mr. Epstein or someone around him; they include large quantities of commercial pornography and images seized from Epstein's devices, but which he did not take or that someone around him did not take. Some of the videos and some of the images do appear to be taken by Mr. Epstein or by others around him. The department’s document identification and review protocols consisted of multiple layers of review and quality control designed to ensure compliance under the act and protect victims. In addition to the department’s review protocols, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York employed an additional review protocol to ensure compliance with a court order requiring United States Attorney Jay Clayton to certify that with respect to certain materials, a large quantity of the materials, a rigorous process was undertaken to protect victims against any clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy. The department’s collection effort resulted in more than 6,000,000 pages being identified as potentially responsive, including department and FBI emails, interview summaries, images, videos, and various other materials collected and generated during the investigations and prosecutions that the act covered. They erred on the side of overcollecting materials from various sources to best ensure maximum transparency and compliance, which necessarily means that the number of responsive pages is significantly smaller than the total number of pages initially collected. That is why they mentioned releasing more than 3,000,000 pages today and not the 6,000,000 pages that were collected. They address what they didn’t produce. The categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld: files that contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files, and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contains images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secrets in the interest of national security or foreign policy,
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we are producing more than 3,000,000 pages, including more than 2,000 videos and a 180,000 images. In total, that means that the department produced approximately three and a half million pages in compliance with the act. Just a quick note about the the videos and images. The 2,000 videos and a 180,000 images are not all videos and images taken by, mister Epstein or someone around him. They include large quantities of commercial pornography and images that were seized from Epstein's devices, but which he did not take or that someone around him did not take. Some of the videos though and some of the images do appear to be taken by mister Epstein or by others around him. Now I wanna talk for a few minutes about the department's document identification and review protocols. It consisted of multiple layers of review and quality control designed to ensure compliance under the act and protect, victims. On top of the review protocols that the department had in place, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York employed an additional review protocol to ensure compliance with a court order requiring United States Attorney Jay Clayton to certify that with respect to certain materials, a large quantity of the materials, a rigorous process was undertaken to protect victims against any clearly unwarranted invasion of their personal privacy. The department's collection effort resulted in more than 6,000,000 pages being identified as potentially responsive, including department and FBI emails, interview summaries, images, videos, and various other materials collected and generated during the various investigations and prosecutions that the act covered. We erred on the side of overcollecting of materials from various sources to best ensure ensure maximum transparency and compliance, which necessarily means that the number of responsive pages is significantly smaller than the total number of pages initially collected. That's why I mentioned a moment ago, we're releasing more than 3,000,000 pages today and not the the 6,000,000 pages that that we that we collected. I wanna address what we didn't produce. The the categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld. Files that contain personal personally identify information of victims or victims' personal and medical files, and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secrets in the interest of national security or foreign policy,
Saved - February 26, 2026 at 4:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall JERTHITA saying it’s nice to think we’d stand for the people when martial law hits; that ex-military would be key to the people’s chance to reclaim freedom. They claim authorities know this and will unleash fake cases to lock you up, make you sick or die, and doctors (mason) will aid sleep. They expect these plans to start before it’s deemed safe for them to take on the country.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

I want to leave a Youtube comment here from 11 years ago. " @JERTHITA11 years ago Its nice to think this way bud. To think that you will stand for the people when Marshall law hits and all. The thing is that they know that ex-military when be key to the people having a fighting chance to take back our freedom. They know you guys will rally and teach the people what you know and give us all hope. So they have plans already in order to take some of you guys out. You will be getting bull crap cases formed against you to lock the most of you up. And/or make most of you guys sick and die. You will go to doctor visits and your doctor is a mason and will help ease you to sleep. Lots of these plans will go into effect before they feel it is safe enough for them to take on the country. " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ljr9PymgYwA&list=WL&index=13

View Full Interactive Feed