reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
@ricwe123 - Richard
How the US organized the coup in Ukraine in 2014 . Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt in full swing..... pt.1 https://t.co/K9hc0KNg2C
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the role of Klitschko in the government and the need to keep the moderate Democrats united. Speaker 0 believes Klitschko should not join the government, while Speaker 1 agrees and suggests that Klitschko should focus on his political work outside the government. They also mention the importance of Yatsenyuk, who has the necessary experience, and suggest regular communication with him and Tony Book. Speaker 0 suggests setting up a call with Klitschko, but Speaker 1 believes Klitschko may take time to join the meeting with the others. They agree that reaching out to Klitschko directly would help manage the dynamics and allow for faster progress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think?
Speaker 1: I think we're in play. The The Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated electron here, especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister. And you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now. So we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's next phone call we want to set up is exactly the one you made to Yachts.
And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response.
Speaker 0: Good. So, I don't think CLEACH should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea.
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, I guess You think in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking In terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is going to be tiny book and his guys. And I'm sure that's part of what Yanekovich is calculating on all of this.
Speaker 0: I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's he's the guy you know, what he needs is cleech and the Tony Book on the outside, he needs to be talking to them 4 times a week. You know? I I I just think Klitsch going in, he's gonna be at that level Working for Yatsenyuk, it's just not gonna work.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I think that's I think that's right. Okay. Good.
Well, do you want us to try to set up a call with him as the next step?
Speaker 0: My understanding from that call, but you tell me was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yachts was gonna offer in that context The Three way you know, the 3 plus 1 conversation or 3 plus 2 with you. Is that not how you understood it?
Speaker 1: No. I think I mean, that's what he proposed. But I think just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he's going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got. He's probably talking to his guys at this point. So I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the 3 and it gives you also a chance to move fast
@Ran_Dumb_Libs - RAN_DUMB_LIBS
@TuckerCarlson The real Ukraine no one is talking about 👀 https://t.co/ozvUdukWvJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Flashback: Mention of sending offensive equipment equals World War 3. US sending 31 tanks to Ukraine. Artillery insufficient. Budget request for pensions and social support. Continual flow of weapons and ammunition. $150 million in military aid pledged by President Biden. Total aid close to $130 billion. Additional $1 billion in military aid announced. Recap.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Flashback. The idea that we're gonna send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains, going in, don't kid yourself. No matter what you all say, that's called World War 3. The next day Today, I'm announcing that the United States will be sending 31 Abram tanks to Ukraine. This fucking guy.
5 minutes later We have artillery. Yes. Thank you. Is it enough? Honestly, not really.
Bullshit. Few moments later. Basically, we're out of money. What? And so that's why today, I'm sending congress a supplemental budget request It's gonna allow pensions and social support to be paid to the Ukrainian people so they have something something in their pocket.
Now get the fuck out of here. It's gonna keep weapons and ammunition flowing without interruption to the brave Ukrainian fighters. The following deal state. The largest assistance package yet from the US to aid in new aid to Ukraine. President Biden is pledging another $150,000,000 in military assistance to 24 hours late.
The US locked down an additional two 1,000,000,000 in military aid, includes artillery, millet The total figure now stands close to $130,000,000,000. A few inches later And a flashback.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
The actual end of democracy. https://t.co/OXA4SHnNug
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there was no Trump-led insurrection as claimed by some. The crowd had no weapons or plan to overthrow the government. Trump himself was at the White House, calling for calm. However, a Colorado Supreme Court ruling cited the 14th Amendment to bar Trump from appearing on the state's ballot, despite no conviction of insurrection. This decision was seen as lunacy, especially when compared to the loss of the US's moral authority abroad. The left celebrated this ruling, with some expressing gratitude to unelected judges for overriding voters' desires. The Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, stated on MSNBC that accusations on television are now enough to remove a presidential candidate. This erosion of due process and the rule of law raises concerns about the state of democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was pretty puzzling to watch. Whatever else January 6th was, and in some ways, we still don't know exactly what it was, it was not a Trump led insurrection. The crowd had no guns. They had no plan to overthrow the government. Nothing like that has ever emerged.
And above all, Trump was not leading it. He was miles away at the White House at the time where he issued a public statement calling for calm and nonviolence. So why were the people on television telling us that Trump led an insurrection? This was, of course, a lie, but it was also a very obvious lie. So, clearly, we are watching the rollout of a talking point, words crafted for a specific purpose.
But what was the purpose? We got an answer to that question yesterday when the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that because he led an insurrection, Donald Trump's then cannot appear on the state's ballot next fall. The 4 liberal judges who concluded this cited as their justification article Three of the 14th Amendment, which was written in 18/68 to keep former Confederate officials from holding office. That was the sum total of their reasoning. Despite the fact Donald Trump has never been convicted by any court of insurrection, and although the 14th amendment specifically does not apply to the presidency, Donald Trump cannot run for president because he's an insurrectionist.
This seemed like lunacy because it was lunacy. 3000 miles away in El Salvador, there was no question about what was happening. The United States has lost its ability to lecture any other country about, quote, democracy, wrote Salvadoran president Nadeem Bukele. And yet in this country, no one on the left dared say that. Instead, Donald Trump's enemies celebrated.
The Atlantic magazine expressed gratitude that unelected judges had, quote, rescued the country from the desires of voters because, actually, that's democracy. And then there was Jenna Griswold. That's the Colorado Secretary of State. You may not have seen her before, but you will instantly recognize the category she represents. Unhappy 39 year old liberal women with Ivy League degrees and a deep streak of authoritarian impulses.
Here's Griswold on MSNBC last night explaining that a conventional legal process is no longer necessary for the left to get its way. No more trials or evidence or jury verdicts. An accusation made on television is now enough to remove a front runner from the presidential race. If Nancy Pelosi and Joe Scarborough call you bad, Americans are not allowed to vote for you. Watch.
Speaker 1: Look. I believe he incited the insurrection. There were big questions around section 3 of the 14th amendment, and the Colorado Supreme Court has weighed in in a very loud way, making themselves clear. Frankly, we've never had a president try to steal the presidency and engage in insurrection, ever before. So Trump's actions are unprecedented.
The Colorado Supreme Court confirmed that the district court got it right, that he did engage in insurrection. Yeah. I think, section 3 of the 14th amendment has to apply to the presidency because if not, it's a get out of jail free card. And in a country of laws where no man is above another, we can't have one office Be able to do whatever they want when it comes to rebellion and then be able to be seated in office again.
Speaker 0: None of this seems very American. All that looks like the actual end of democracy.
@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™
@TuckerCarlson The truth about Russia and Ukraine. https://t.co/1W7AHktNcb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses US interference in Ukraine and its implications. It mentions the historical background of Western Ukraine siding with the Nazis during World War 2 and the emergence of extremist groups in Ukraine. It highlights the influence of the CIA, US State Department, and IMF in Ukraine's affairs, including orchestrating a coup against Yanukovych. The video also touches on the war in Ukraine and its impact on globalization. It suggests that the conflict is driven by the desire for control over Ukraine's resources and the deep state's involvement. It concludes by mentioning the need for dialogue and a "great reset" to address global issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. Operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector, neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine.
Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed, Yushchenko, in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer, that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by Western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych.
Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying you need Biden, and I said probably tomorrow for an Boy, and I get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing.
Speaker 2: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about coup Or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel, the very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jazz. The
Speaker 3: world's biggest investment fund says the war in Ukraine has put an And to globalization as we know it. Larry Fink is the chief executive of BlackRock. Countries and businesses are cutting ties with Russia. They're also imposing sanctions against the country, including cutting off its central bank from its foreign reserves, Fink predicts that with Russia's decoupling from the world, Governments and companies will reevaluate their supply chains and even consider reconsider the dependency in other nations.
Speaker 4: See, the truth is slowly gonna come out about what's really going on. And what's really going on is this. The Ukraine has been the center of Of the globalists for decades decades decades, 70 years at least, CIA, which is not a good organization, They're they're the the implementers of deep state, let's say. They've been working this in the Ukraine for 70 years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything. Why?
Because because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine. That's what this is all about. Particularly Eastern Ukraine, massive natural resources The CIA goes in, gets control of an American business interest, and they're not business. They're just robber barons. They're not legitimate businessmen.
They just wanna steal, and that's what goes on. And so they're taking that away from from the from Russia and the Ukraine. And on top of that, it's the center of the deep state. And so by Vlad Putin going in, he's cutting the head off the snake. Once the head comes off, the whole beast will die.
So that's what's actually going on, folks. So please, They are gonna tell you their stories about, possible nuclear war and Vlad's a bad man. This is the war with Russia that they wanted with Hillary Clinton as president because she lost The whole war against Russia was postponed. This is the plan they always had.
Speaker 5: This has been in the works going back to at least 2015, 2016. It was somewhat set back by the election of Donald Trump in the United States because Trump was not a globalist, but he was opposed to many of these schemes. What we're seeing now is a merger of the great reset, the green new deal, The policies on on COVID and a number of other aspects of of government policy, which is being directed not on behalf of sovereign governments, But against sovereign governments. And this is why we're seeing the situation in Ukraine. And what is Russia's crime?
Putin has asked for 20 years for security guarantees for Russia, and these guarantees include No further eastward expansion of NATO, which was promised to Gorbachev in 1990, which was promised again to Yeltsin in 1994, And yet NATO keeps moving to the very borders of Russia. Now they're talking about, as Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, did at the Munich Security Conference, That Ukraine has a right to develop nuclear weapons. And for Putin, Russia's security is directly threatened by 2 aspects u the Ukraine situation, the corruption which includes prominent Nazis in positions of the defense and security forces of Ukraine, The European Union actually acknowledged in 2018 that the defense and security forces of Ukraine were heavily infiltrated by Neo Nazis marching behind the banners of the Ukrainian SS, which joined Hitler in the 19 forties. And when Putin said you need u Vacation of Ukraine, he was called crazy. But the idea of a government, corrupt government being used not To defend the Ukrainian people's freedom and sovereignty.
And I hate to see what's being done to the people of Ukraine right now in this war, But they are the cannon fodder for a NATO and US and British drive to bring down Russia and China. Why? Because they're the 2 leading powers in the world that oppose giving up sovereignty to this Green New Deal and the Great Reset.
Speaker 6: I I don't have too many remedies. The the remedies have to be discussed through dialogue by the stakeholders of our global system, But, I just see the need for such a dialogue, and I see the need for action. I see the need for a great reset.
Speaker 7: To what extent would a reset be brought about by a change in the White House, the election of Joe Biden, for instance?
Speaker 6: I don't know. We first, we shouldn't speculate about the outcome of the election. We will see, beginning of November and Sunday, we we can in any case, we can, and so it's a World Economic Forum, is a very open and as a open platform to integrate everybody who is willing To address those issues in a spirit, which means, to exercise here, true global citizenship.
@RobertKennedyJr - Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Here’s the truth about the war in Ukraine https://t.co/pBf4XkTO21
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle it on favorable terms. They argue that the US spends a significant amount of money on military contracts and expanding NATO. The speaker criticizes the allocation of funds, stating that the money could have been used to address homelessness. They also mention that the war will require further expenses for rebuilding. The speaker suggests that politicians and defense manufacturers benefit from this situation, referring to it as a money laundering scheme. They question the loan given to Ukraine and its repayment prospects. The speaker highlights the loan conditions imposed, including austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the ownership of these corporations, specifically mentioning BlackRock. The speaker concludes by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions unchecked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a war that should have never happened. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors and want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why?
Because then that country has to conform its military purchases and NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, North Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed and get a trapped market. March of 2022, we committed a $113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that 2 months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big expenses are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild all the things that we destroy.
Mitch McConnell was asked, and we really afford to set to spend a 113,000,000,000 to Ukraine. He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme.
And who do you think owns every one of those companies? And BlackRock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan.
Raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? And if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions.
And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number 1, extreme austerity program. So if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number 2, most important, Ukraine has and put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a 1000 years of war fought over that land.
It's the richest farmland in the world. It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about this long condition.
They've already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah.
BlackRock. And then in December, president Biden and gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? And Iraq. So they're doing this right in front of us.
They don't even care that we know anymore because they know and that they can get away with it. And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old, old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us hating on each other.
They keep the republicans and democrats fighting each other and black against white and all these divisions that they saw.
@MakingFranklins - SpicySecretHistory
Tartaria and the C I A https://t.co/CXbDYFk2rS
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a document from the CIA discussing Tartaria in Soviet Russia, revealing a directive to falsify Tartar history to hide the truth about Tartar-Russian relations. This challenges mainstream historical narratives, suggesting a more advanced empire existed. The video questions the Smithsonian's portrayal of Native Americans as isolated and unintelligent. This prompts reflection on the manipulation of history to fit certain narratives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was this empire, highly advanced. This empire existed in modern day Russia, but now historians stuff like, no it didn't. Well, guess what? There's a document from the CIA. It's about Soviet Russia and the impacts of communism with the changing and racing of history.
And they talk about Tartari. Says, or let us take the matter of history, the core of a people's cultural heritage. For example, the Central Committee of the Communist Party issued a directive ordering the parties to proceed to the scientific revision of the history of Tartaria. Tartar history was to be falsified in order to eliminate references to hide the fact of the real course of the Tartar Russian relations. What does that all mean?
So basically, it exists. That's that just made me freak out a little bit. Yeah. We talked about the native Americans and, like, how developed they were and, like, how they're connected to people groups from all over the world. But the Smithsonian is, like, no, we're gonna write history like this.
They were isolated and dumb. Yeah. It can't be vindicated because it didn't exist. Yeah.
@raven_ravendran - RAVEN NAIDOO 🇿🇦
What it is like living with a corrupt Goverment. https://t.co/lx0MzAwv9W
@TulsiGabbard - Tulsi Gabbard 🌺
WATCH: Ukraine’s “democracy” in action. Since our government is taking billions from our pockets to “protect democracy,” shouldn’t the country we are supposedly protecting (while destroying it) actually be a democracy? https://t.co/HKnmE54Hsr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine's President Zelensky banned another opposition party, seized assets, and controlled TV networks. He extended his term, canceled elections under martial law, and suspended the constitution. This raises concerns about potential dictatorship and abuse of power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is something that the political establishment and propaganda media don't want you to know. Ukraine's president Zelensky has just banned yet another political opposition party, one that questioned his legitimacy as president and used Ukraine's Department of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members' assets. Now this is just the latest of Zelensky's actions to do this sort of thing. He began banning major political opposition parties in 2022 when he also started banning TV channels that were associated with his political opponents, and he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks, now controlled by their government. Zelensky's presidential term ended on May 20th.
He canceled elections in the name of martial law, suspending Ukraine's constitution so that he could stay in power. And defenders of Zelensky will say, hey. Ukraine is in the middle of a war. They can't have elections. Just stop for a moment and think, if we accept that excuse or criteria for suspending the constitution and canceling elections, then we should presume that leaders in our own country and our own establishment media will also use this same excuse and rationale when they suspend our constitution and our elections, since we too are at war with Russia and China.
If you think this sounds crazy, look at what's already going on. They've already started conditioning us to accept a dictatorship by rationalizing their own use of our Department of Justice to target president Trump and other political enemies in their efforts to stay in power.
@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom
The Ukraine war explained. F++k the US government. https://t.co/7GVAKDeIsl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukraine war has deep historical roots, starting with NATO's expansion after the Cold War, which Russia viewed as a betrayal of promises made during German unification. Key events include the U.S. withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile treaty in 2002, the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and U.S. involvement in Ukraine's regime change in 2014. Despite Russia's calls to halt NATO's eastward expansion, the U.S. continued its military presence near Russian borders. In late 2021, Russia proposed a security agreement to prevent NATO enlargement, which was rejected. The conflict escalated into war, with significant Ukrainian casualties, as the U.S. and its allies encouraged Ukraine to resist rather than negotiate peace. The narrative surrounding the war often overlooks these complexities, presenting a simplified view of aggression and defense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just explain in 2 minutes the Ukraine war. This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990, February 9, 1990. James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move 1 inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War 2. And, Gorbachev said that's very important.
Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic.
At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, the US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much.
But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American, actually asked maybe we should join NATO, when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then 911 came, then came, Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah.
We'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came 2 other decisive actions. In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event, never discussed in this context.
But what it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat to national security by making possible a decapitation strike of missiles that are a few minutes away from Moscow. And we put in 2 Aegis missile systems. We say it's defense. Russia says, how do we know it's not Tomahawk nuclear tipped missiles in your silos? You've told us we have nothing to do with this.
And so we walked out of the ABM Treaty unilaterally in 2002. And then in 2003, we invaded Iraq on completely phony pretenses as I've explained. In 2,004, 5, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine, the so called first color revolution. It put in office somebody that I knew and was I was friends with, and and kind of distantly friends with president Yushchenko, because I was an adviser to the Ukrainian government in 1993, 94, 95. And then the US had its dirty hands in this.
It should not meddle in other countries' elections. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down, for Ukraine. That calmed things down because the US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian.
What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in February 22, 2014, the United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation. Have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor.
They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now. And if you know her name and what she's done, have sympathy for me. Really. Between her and, the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piatt, who's a senior state department official till today. And they talked about regime change.
They said, who's gonna be the next government? Why don't we pick this one? No Klitschko shouldn't go in. It should be. Ah, yes.
It was, and we'll get we'll get the big guy, Biden, to come in and do an attaboy, they say, you know, pat them on the back. It's great. So they made the new government, and I happened to be invited to go there soon after that, not knowing any of the background. And then some of it was, in a very ugly way, explained to me after I arrived how the US had participated in this. All of this is to say, the US then said, okay.
Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 7 more countries in the not 1 inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but the US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems After breaking a treaty, 2019, we walked out of the Intermediate Nuclear Force Treaty.
In 2017, we walked out of the JCPOA, the treaty with Iran. This is the partner. This is the trust building. In other words, it's completely reckless US foreign policy. On December 15, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement.
You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war.
Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announced that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen?
Why don't you announce? And he said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan.
Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. You have to have some prudence.
There's no such thing as an open door that we're gonna be there, and we're gonna put our missile systems there, and that's our right. There's no right to that. We declared in 18/23, Europeans don't come to the Western Hemisphere. That's the Monroe doctrine. The whole Western Hemisphere after all.
Okay. Anyway, they turned down the negotiations. Then the special military operation started. And 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay.
Neutrality. And then the Turks said, we'll we'll mediate this. And I flew to Ankara to discuss it with the Turkish negotiators because I wanted to hear exactly what was going on. So what was going on was they reached an agreement with a few odds and ends. And then the United States and Britain said, no way.
You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.
Absolutely ghastly. So when you think about your question, we have to understand we're not dealing with as we're told every day with this madman like Hitler coming at us and violating this and violating that, and he's gonna take over Europe. This is complete bogus fake history that is a purely PR narrative of the US government, and it doesn't stand up at all to anyone that knows anything. And if you try to say a word of this, I got completely cut out of the New York Times back in 2022 after writing my whole life columns for them. Oh, I'd send this.
Okay. And by the way, online, it's not even space. You know? There's no limit. They can publish 700 words.
They would not publish, since then, 700 words for me about what I saw with my own eyes, about what this war is about. They won't do it. We're playing games here. So God forbid, a nuclear power comes at us. I don't know what's gonna happen, but we came at them, and we should stop going after China and Taiwan.
@frontlinekit - Richard Woodruff 🇺🇦
We're in Ukraine. Here's why. https://t.co/Z079hmx548
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good morning. I'm Richard Woodruff from Lviv, Ukraine. I want to address Tucker Carlson. Real Americans and freedom-loving citizens from Britain and Europe have stood with Ukraine for over a thousand days. Meanwhile, you sit in Moscow, enjoying cocktails while ignoring the genocide happening here. You have no understanding of the situation, and history will remember your actions during this invasion. People will look back and see you as someone who supported the Russians for personal gain. Tucker, you are condemned for your stance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning. My name is Richard Woodruff from Lviv Ukraine. And I wanna say to
Speaker 1: a Tucker Carlson sorry. Tucker Carlson that real Americans stand with Ukraine. The real Americans have been here for 1014 days. Real freedom loving British and European citizens have been here for over a 1000 days standing with the Ukrainians. And what do you do?
You sit in Moscow, the powerful elite, elite, sipping cocktails and champagne, laughing about the genocide of Ukrainians. Right? That's exactly what you're doing right now. You have absolutely no idea, you fucking worthless man, and I'm glad all of humanity and all of history will know exactly what you have done. And people will look back at this genocidal invasion and say Tucker Carlson.
He was the one simping for the Russians. All for a little bit of that blood money. Hey, Tucker. Fuck you.
@DemoDog1776 - DemoDog ☣️
@RedpillDrifter Listen. Pure evil in Ukraine! 👇 https://t.co/cgqKTK8SRz
Video Transcript AI Summary
Дети в возрасте от 3 до 7 лет собирались в Изюме и привозились в специальный пункт. На первом этаже их раздевали, а на втором утилизировали как ненужный материал, хоронили в ямах или не вывозили. Это напоминало обращение с животными, как будто они были скотом. Говорили о забирании органов, и хотя я слышал об этом, не верил, пока не увидел своими глазами. Когда увидишь, не сможешь простить.
---
Children aged 3 to 7 were gathered in Izium and brought to a specific point. On the first floor, they were undressed, and on the second, they were disposed of like waste material, buried in pits or not taken away. It resembled the treatment of animals, as if they were livestock. There were mentions of organ harvesting, and although I had heard about it, I didn't believe it until I saw it with my own eyes. Once you see it, you cannot forgive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Группа, да, получается, собирала детей по изюму маленьких от 3 до 6 до 7 и привозила именно вот в этот пункт там их раздевали на первом этаже а на втором их разливали как ненужный материал и просто хоронили в ямах или Туда не вывозили. И вот эти ребята, они, знаете, говорили, как будто они как будто какую-то скотину звали, поросенка или кролика. Ну они да, привозили. Как будто какая-то ферма, понимаете? Имплантация.
Забирали органы. Слышал об этом, но не верил. Пока своими глазами не увидишь, не поймешь. А когда увидишь, не простишь.
@scrowder - Steven Crowder
My thoughts on Zelensky https://t.co/zSKOxsg0KR
Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't stand Putin, but Zelenskyy rubs me the wrong way too. The idea that support from the U.S. is never-ending is a pervasive problem with entities like NATO, the UN, Europe, and Canada. Without the U.S., Ukraine would be Russia. These modern comforts are supported by the U.S. and our military, which emboldens people like Putin. There's no winning without the U.S., so don't be a jerk in the Oval Office. Zelenskyy always wants a photo op, walks around like cartoon Steve Jobs, and is probably working on a book deal. He says they've been alone since day one, which isn't true. They've received hundreds of billions of dollars, largely from the U.S. A little gratitude would be nice when you visit our Oval Office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just watched the exchange with, Zelensky and, president Trump. Vance, I don't think I've ever seen a thing
Speaker 1: like that. Have you? No. Not in public. No.
Not in public. Look. Here's the thing. Okay. And people wanna act like you're either Ukraine or you're you're you're you're Russia or Putin.
I can't stand Putin. Do I think he's former KGB yet? Do I think he's a totalitarian yet? Do I think he's interested in freedom? Absolutely not.
Don't like the way that he went into Ukraine. I think he'll take anything he can get. Alright? But Zelenskyy is more indicative of the pervasive problem that we're dealing with, whether it's NATO, whether it's the UN, whether it's the rest of Europe, whether it's Canada. This idea that it's a never ending supply of support from The United States, wow, you bitch about it.
This has to start with some semblance of truth. Okay? Without The United States, guess what? You're Russia, Ukraine. That was the law of the land.
That's what happened. Stronger nations conquered weaker nations. All of these these modern comforts that people take for granted, they're entirely supported by The United States and our military. Not a nation in Europe, certainly not Ukraine, certainly not Canada. And that is the mindset that emboldens people like Putin because they know at a certain point that well runs dry.
Does that make sense? Does that make someone pro Russia to acknowledge there's no winning here and there's certainly no winning without The United States? And if you accept those truths, probably not a good idea to walk into the Oval Office and be a dick. Here's how you know he's not being honest, Zelensky. First off, everything is a photo.
He rubs me the wrong way. K? Can't stand Putin. Got it? Zelensky rubs me the wrong way.
Why? Because he's walking around in the same outfit like his cartoon Steve Jobs, and he's working for a book deal after this. None of it seems genuine. And he sits and he says, we have been we have been thronged since day one, and we have been alone. They haven't been thronged since day one.
They've been getting this has been a shellacking, and everyone has been with them since day one. None of those statements are honest. How many how many Ukraine flags on x on Instagram? How many hundreds of billions of dollars largely from The United States and other nations for you to say, oh, maybe you haven't been alone. Please, thank you.
These are the words that people might like to hear when you come to our motherfucking Oval Office.
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Dubinsky has called for an emergency Parliament session to impeach President Zelensky after a heated confrontation with President Trump in the Oval Office. Reports suggest Zelensky's urgent requests for U.S. aid were met with harsh realities, revealing vulnerabilities in his leadership. Dubinsky, who has faced sanctions, criticized Zelensky as unfit to lead against Russia or the new U.S. administration. In Kyiv, rumors of betrayal are spreading, with Zelensky's team reportedly trying to salvage their positions as his regime faces significant challenges.
@MAGAResource - MAGA Resource
JUST IN. Zelenskyy’s Empire Crumbling: Ukrainian MP Demands Impeachment After Oval Office Meltdown In a stunning turn of events, Ukrainian MP Oleksandr Dubinsky has ignited a firestorm by demanding an emergency session of Parliament to impeach President Volodymyr Zelensky, following a humiliating Oval Office shouting match with President Trump. Sources say Zelensky’s desperate pleas for more American cash were met with a MAGA-sized reality check, exposing his regime’s weakness as it teeters on the brink of collapse. Dubinsky, a truth-teller sanctioned by Biden’s cronies, declared Zelensky’s leadership a sham, unfit to face Russia or America’s new no-nonsense administration. Posts on X are buzzing—this is huge, proof the globalist puppet’s strings are finally snapping. Across Kyiv, whispers of betrayal grow louder, with insiders claiming Zelensky’s inner circle is scrambling to save face before the inevitable fall. America First wins again as Ukraine’s corrupt house of cards comes crashing down in real time
@bertalanzoli - The world is patriots.🇺🇸🇷🇺
The famous celebrities who are fans of the dictator Zelensky https://t.co/Y6kZwrNsEI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a list of American actors who support Ukraine: Mila Jovovich, Sean Penn, Angelina Jolie, Jessica Chastain, Ben Stiller, Liev Schneider, Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Tom Hanks, Jake Gyllenhaal, Margot Robbie, Tom Hardy, Emily Blunt, Christian Bale, Zendaya, Timothy Chalome, Gal Gadot, Dwayne Johnson, Jennifer Lawrence, Matt Damon, Reese Witherspoon, Will Smith, Halle Berry, George Clooney, Nicole Kidman, Johnny Depp, Kristen Stewart, Eddie Redmayne, Suresha Ronan, Ryan Gosling, Rachel McAdams, Chris Evans, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, Tessa Thompson, Henry Cavill, Anya Taylor Joy, Jason Momoa, Natalie Dormer, Andrew Garfield, Florence Pugh, Idris Elba, Biola Davis, Chewatel Ejiofor, Lupita Nyong'o, Michael B. Jordan, Chadwick Boseman, Brie Larson, Tom Holland, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Evangeline Lilly, Kit Harrington, Emilia Clarke, Sophie Turner, Maisie Williams, Richard Madden, Gwendolyn Christie, Nikolay Coster Waldo, Lina Heedy, Peter Dinklage, John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, Samuel L. Jackson, Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jeremy Renner, Chris Pratt, Zoe Kravitz, Robert Pattinson, Colin Farrell, Killian Murphy, Barry Kjogan, Paul Mesquel, Daniel Day Lewis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American Actors Who Support Ukraine. Mila Jovovich, Sean Penn, Angelina Jolie, Jessica Chastain, Ben Stiller, Liev Schneider, Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Tom Hanks, Jake Gyllenhaal, Margot Robbie, Tom Hardy, Emily Blunt, Christian Bale, Zendaya, Timothy Chalome, Gal Gadot, Dwayne Johnson, Jennifer Lawrence, Matt Damon, Reese Witherspoon, Will Smith, Halle Berry, George Clooney, Nicole Kidman, Johnny Depp, Kristen Stewart, Eddie Redmayne, Suresha Ronan, Ryan Gosling, Rachel McAdams, Chris Evans, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, Tessa Thompson, Henry Cavill, Anya Taylor Joy, Jason Momoa, Natalie Dormer, Andrew Garfield, Florence Pugh, Idris Elba, Biola Davis, Chewatel Ejiofor, Lupita Nyong'o, Michael B. Jordan, Chadwick Boseman, Brie Larson, Tom Holland, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Evangeline Lilly, Kit Harrington, Emilia Clarke, Sophie Turner, Maisie Williams,
Speaker 1: Richard Madden, Gwendolyn Christie, Nikolay Coster Waldo, Lina Heedy, Peter Dinklage, John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, Samuel L. Jackson, Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jeremy Renner, Chris Pratt, Zoe Kravitz, Robert Pattinson, Colin Farrell, Killian Murphy, Barry Kjogan, Paul Mesquel,
Speaker 0: Daniel Day Lewis.
@dustinemills24 - dustin mills
JUST IN: 🇺🇦 Ukrainian journalist accuses Volodymyr Zelensky of jailing and killing opponents, labeling him a "dictator." "Zelensky took Ukraine hostage. We want freedom. He imprisoned or killed anyone who dared to speak out." https://t.co/WjyK3AxIEd
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm asking for your attention today. Zelenskyy has taken Ukraine hostage, and we want freedom. He has imprisoned or killed anyone who has dared to speak out against him, and we need your help to stop him.
Thousands of cases have been opened under charges of treason, which carries a life sentence. I'm sharing a list of people who have suffered for telling the truth, including journalists, priests, and politicians. They are all imprisoned on fabricated charges and are being tortured and beaten. This is just a fraction of the cases we know about.
I believe in the power of free speech. Please share this list, which I will attach to the video, and help save these people from dictator Zelensky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I ask for your attention. Zelenskyy took Ukraine hostage. We want freedom. He imprisoned or killed anyone who dared to speak out. We need your help.
Thousands of cases have been opened under the chart of treason. The defense carries a life sentence. In fact, it's even worse. I'm sharing a list of people who suffered for the truth. People who emailed me and whose cases we managed to confirm.
Those are journalists, priests, politicians. All of them are in prison now on fabricated charges. They are being tortured and beaten. It's just a fraction about whom we managed to find out. I believe in power free speech.
Please share this list. I'll attach it to the video. Save people from dictator Zelensky.
@JOKAQARMY1 - mrredpillz jokaqarmy
AI replacement of the government 🤔. https://t.co/lHT4DGNTgh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a bill that proposes replacing the Department of Commerce with AI. According to the speaker, the bill stipulates that for the next ten years, no politician or governing body can stop AI or enforce laws regulating AI models, which the speaker believes equates to Silicon Valley controlling the government.
The speaker claims this control extends to weather manipulation and the healthcare system, with the added provision that these companies cannot be sued. The speaker draws parallels to the Vaccine Protection Act of 1986 and the Telecommunication Act of 1996, suggesting a pattern of government actions that protect corporations from liability. The speaker concludes by expressing concern that these actions are setting the stage for AI to replace the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So today, we're gonna go down one of the largest rabbit holes I've ever found, and this is the replacement of the government with AI, and that's what's in this bill. Let's talk about it. So in section four three two zero one, it talks about replacing the Department of Commerce with AI. Now the question comes with what else do they replace with AI? And here's where it gets really strange.
It talks about in this section below that no politician or governing body may stop AI for the next ten years or enforce any laws or regulations regulating artificial intelligence models. That's Silicon Valley owning the government. Then we find Silicon Valley manipulating the weather. Then it gets weirder when we find AI and Silicon Valley entering the health care system to control all that, and you can't sue any of these companies. Isn't that odd?
And this kinda reminds me of the Vaccine Protection Act signed by Reagan in 1986 protecting all the vaccine companies from damages. There were so many lawsuits that they were actually gonna go out of business, but the government protected them. And it gets even deeper when we find Billy Boy Clinton in the Telecommunication Act of 1996. He passed a bill so if they put a cell phone tower in front of your house, you can't sue for any damages. Do you see how the government is kinda setting us up, and then they're gonna replace the government with AI?
It's kinda really strange. It's almost like Black Mirror. I don't know.
@gregreese - Greg Reese
Technocracy Rising https://t.co/7wfXE1gsIW
Video Transcript AI Summary
"While many people rightly say that money is already digital, when world leaders say digital money today, it means cryptocurrency, which is now part of a worldwide scheme to monitor your actions and control your money."
"This new form of currency will require you to have a unique digital wallet, which is essentially a digital ID."
"Last spring, European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde said that the ECB will be ready to launch the digital euro by this October."
"According to the Atlantic Council, a 137 countries and currency unions are preparing for a crypto digital currency."
"Three countries have already launched theirs, The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria."
"CBDCs in the advanced stages are the digital euro, China's digital yuan, India's e rupee, The United Kingdom's digital pound, Brazil's digital reel, and Russia's digital ruble."
"The Trump family even have their own stablecoin, the USD 1 stablecoin from World Liberty Financial."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While many people rightly say that money is already digital, when world leaders say digital money today, it means cryptocurrency, which is now part of a worldwide scheme to monitor your actions and control your money. This new form of currency will require you to have a unique digital wallet, which is essentially a digital ID. Last spring, European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde said that the ECB will be ready to launch the digital euro by this October. According to the Atlantic Council, a 137 countries and currency unions are preparing for a crypto digital currency. Three countries have already launched theirs, The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria.
CBDCs in the advanced stages are the digital euro, China's digital yuan, India's e rupee, The United Kingdom's digital pound, Brazil's digital reel, and Russia's digital ruble. Hong Kong is preparing to launch a stablecoin. Japan's financial services agency is preparing to launch a Japanese yen stablecoin this fall. And president Trump, who has been pushing stablecoin development, has repeatedly announced that The USA will lead the world in AI and crypto. His family is heavily invested and stand to make billions when the world goes crypto.
The Trump family even have their own stablecoin, the USD 1 stablecoin from World Liberty Financial. Trump's puppet masters likely have another stablecoin in mind to be the digital dollar, but a puppet can still dream. The only difference between a CBDC, central bank digital currency, and a stablecoin is name only. Both will be programmed according to the nation's financial policies. Both are capable of operating a carbon tax and a social credit score.
The only difference is one will be managed by a central bank and the other by a private corporation. In The USA, something like BlackRock, CEO of BlackRock and longtime business associate of president Trump, Larry Fink, was recently appointed interim co chair of the World Economic Forum. The Trump administration has been normalizing the deployment of the US military as a police force in the streets of America. And according to Fox News, Pentagon officials are about to mobilize National Guard troops in 19 states to assist homeland security with president Trump's nationwide crackdown on illegal immigration and crime. This likely means ID checkpoints because how else will a citizen prove their citizenship?
But with a new digital ID, the military police state can simply scan you from a distance with Palantir technology. Doctors are discussing online how president Trump's swollen ankles and hand bruising are indications of congestive heart failure. The bruises on the hand being typical of IV diuretic treatments. The White House says it's from shaking hands. If Trump goes the unfortunate way of the clot shot, which he is still proud of, then J.
D. Vance will be president, and he owes everything to Palantir's Peter Thiel, one of technocracy's biggest cheerleaders. The stage is now set for crypto and digital IDs. And if that happens, there will be pushback, especially in the 19 states being supplied with the National Guard. Greg Reese reporting.
The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreese.substack.com.
@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics
Everyone knows that the Ukrainian regime is highly corrupt. But did you know that it also runs a network of secret torture prisons? Ukraine isn’t a democracy. It’s a totalitarian regime that beats, tortures, and murders dissidents. Special New Rules investigation👇 https://t.co/3lfSGNbLX3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents an investigative-style alternation between eyewitness testimonies and narrative framing, asserting that Ukraine operates secret torture prisons run by the SBU (Ukrainian security service) where dissidents are beaten, waterboarded, electrocuted, subjected to gas-lit forms of torture, raped, and often murdered. It frames this as a systemic, state-sponsored program that predates the 2022 invasion and intensified with the Donbas conflict, accusing Western NGOs of collusion and portraying Ukraine as a totalitarian regime suppressing opposition.
Key claims and testimonies include:
- Mehdi Firvanovic, an engineer from Kharkov, describes becoming politically engaged after the Maidan and the Odessa trade union massacre, joining the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov. He was arrested by the SBU in August 2017 and sentenced to twelve years, later released in a prisoner exchange. He recounts elaborate torture in SBU facilities and details the treatment of a cellmate, Zverev, a 1955-born professional from the Ministry of Emergency Situations, who endured brutal beatings, water dousing, and “swallow technique” confinement. Zverev allegedly described being beaten with sticks, truncheons, and rubber hoses, having his body bruised, and facing death sentences read aloud and executions simulated with gunfire near the head. Mehdi also describes a method in which prisoners are bound, taped to a door, a helmet placed on, and noise cranked to 100–120 decibels to induce unconsciousness or death.
- The narrative alleges that court testimony is the only admissible record of abuse and that torture occurring outside of court is not recorded. It asserts the existence of a deliberate collusion between the Ukrainian SBU and Western NGOs, claiming that Human Rights Watch representatives (including a Lithuanian named Vikentas Ladikis/Ladikis) were used by the SBU to interrogate prisoners, and that testimonies were transmitted through lawyers and prison mail. Mehdi claims to have alerted HRW to the collusion, and that Ladikis was removed about a month later.
- The Mariupol center is highlighted as the most elaborate torture hub, with accounts from Olga Silevskoye, a former Mariupol resistance leader, who describes detentions at a gypsy settlement, the library at the Mariupol Airport, and SBU basements, where torture included suffocation, waterboarding, electric shocks, and a hostile environment overseen by Azov Battalion personnel. She recounts being held for 120 days, enduring electric shocks, and witnessing a rack, bloodstains, and a room with a stockpile of torture indicators. She describes “libraries” as covert torture sites, with victims coerced into implicating militia members or voters who supported the referendum.
- Father Fiophan, an Orthodox priest, testifies to his arrest in 2015 and over a month of torture at Mariupol, including interrogations, electric shocks, spiritual trauma, and suffocation.
- A survivor named Speaker 3 describes an interrogation regime at a temporary SBU facility, where he was forced to confront questions about drugs, subjected to electric shocks, batons, suffocation, and water torture, with a method involving placing a heavy bench to press the legs.
- Another Donbas veteran, Alexander Matushin, explains prisoner exchanges that included civilians and soldiers and recounts a case of a girl who was gang-raped, and later assaulted with various objects when men were no longer able to rape her.
- Russian accounts describe a broader pattern: civilians, Saint George ribbon wearers, and those with Russian contacts were targeted for torture, and torture chambers were found in liberated settlements; officials used informants to accuse individuals of supporting the referendum or having ties to Russia, leading to imprisonment and exploitation as a means to suppress dissent.
- The 2022 conflict is said to have intensified the system, with claims of castration in some cases and the transfer of detainees to concentration camps in central or western Ukraine, intensifying cruel treatment and dehumanization.
- The narrative concludes with a broad indictment: the testimonies illustrate a pattern of war crimes, political repression, and a regime that, in the view of the speakers, warrants Western scrutiny and raises concerns over foreign support for Ukraine. The call to action asks viewers to like and repost to raise awareness and “expose the truth” about Ukraine.
Throughout, the speakers emphasize personal experience, firsthand testimony, and the alleged pervasiveness of secret detention facilities across multiple Ukrainian cities, including Mariupol, Kharkov, Kramatorsk, Pokrovsk, and others, with torture described in graphic detail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For more than a decade, Ukraine has waged a global propaganda war to portray itself as a defiant young democracy defending itself against Russian aggression. But over the past couple weeks, this myth has begun to collapse. President Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and other prominent political figures have publicly called out Zelenskyy as a dictator that cancels elections and silences political dissent. But Ukraine's problem goes much deeper than Zelensky. Since The US backed color revolution in 2014, Ukraine has become a totalitarian state that not only bans political opposition, but also tortures and kills its members.
This is the New Rules podcast, and I'm your host Dmitry Simons junior. Today, we're going to be exposing secret Ukrainian torture prisons where dissidents are beaten, waterboarded, electrocuted, raped, and oftentimes murdered. These prisons are run by Ukraine's infamous secret police, the SBU. For this special investigation, we spoke to survivors and witnesses of these Ukrainian secret prisons. So all the information you'll get in this video comes from firsthand knowledge and personal experience.
Before diving into this investigation, we have one small request. Please help us share this video as widely as possible. No one in the mainstream media will touch the topic of Ukrainian secret prisons. So we need your help to raise awareness about these heinous crimes. Our first speaker is Mehdi Firvanovic, an engineer from Kharkov.
Before 2014, Mehdi wasn't a particularly political person. However, like many residents of Southeastern Ukraine, he was shot by the Maidan Kola revolution and subsequent anti Russian violence. He told us that the last straw for him was the Odessa trade union massacre when pro Russia protesters were burned alive by a gang of neo Nazi folks. By the way, one of these thugs, Alexey Goncharenko, is now a famous Ukrainian lawmaker. He's constantly quoted by Western media outlets, for example.
Shortly after the Odessa trade union fire, Mehdi joined the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov. Many local men wanted to go to the Donbas to help the rebel militias there fight against the Ukrainian regime. Mehdi's job was to help coordinate the logistics of that. However, the Ukrainian secret police were closely monitoring him. In August 2017, Mehti was arrested by SBU agents and sentenced to twelve years in prison.
Mehti at the time of his arrest was 83 years old, so the SBU wanted to put him in jail until he was 95 years old. Thankfully, he was released at a much earlier date, thanks to a prisoner exchange. Let's listen to what Mehdi had to say about his time in SBU prison.
Speaker 1: Extremely elaborate forms of torture were used there against me specifically. Everyone was brutally beaten. I provided you with the testimony of one person who ended up in our cell and I took down his testimony so to speak. What is this? This is the testimony.
What I'm about to tell you is from a man with whom I spent a year and a half in the same cell on the neighboring bunk. His last name is Zverev. He was born in 1955. This year he'll turn 70. He is a professional first responder from the Ministry of Emergency Situations, MCHAS.
When he was brought into our cell and undressed, we initially thought he was a hardened criminal. His entire torso was blue. We assumed they were tattoos at first, but they weren't. They were bruises from beatings. He was picked up in the Kharkov region in Balakliya, and they started beating him immediately.
They would punch and kick him and beat him with sticks, truncheons, and rubber hoses, just mercilessly. When he would lose consciousness, they would splash water on him so he'd regain consciousness. And this would go on sometimes for days. You know, I don't judge anyone. People who are being beaten to end this torment, they'd start talking.
But even in this vile Bandera run Ukraine, only testimonies given in court under protocol are taken into account. If it all happened outside of court, it is disregarded. That is they consider it, but they cannot put it on record. They really want to look legitimate as if they're upholding those so called European values. He told us that he was captured and beaten.
They pulverized him. Well, I already mentioned that they kicked and punched him while striking him with sticks, whatever they could find. They'd perform what is called the swallow technique. This is when they tie a person's hands and feet from behind, pull them together, and then start beating them. But they also have another form of torture.
They would sentence a person, they would read out a death sentence, then put a bag over his head, and take him somewhere into the woods. The person has no idea where they are being taken. Then they would read the sentence again and start firing shots near their head. This man, Kolyas Verev, didn't break even though they took him out to be shot numerous times, and they have another method of torture. Prisoners who survived told me about it, and I know it well, as I have studied both the environment and the effects of various factors on the human body.
I know that the threshold for noise that a person can endure without severe consequences is 65 decibels. But here's what they do. They take a person. In every cell, the outer door is solid metal while the inner one is barred. They tape the person to that inner barred door with duct tape without any support for their legs.
Their hands and feet are subsequently bound. Then they put a helmet on them and blast noise at 100 to 120 decibels. It's unbearable torture. People lose consciousness. Some simply die because it is impossible to endure.
Prisoners told me they were subjected to this kind of torture in Ukraine. I have seen a lot of things in my life, believe me. I am someone who is well prepared. But to this day, I cannot sit down at a computer and describe what they did to women and girls. It's impossible.
Do you understand? They are not human beings. These are not human beings.
Speaker 0: One of the most shocking revelations that Mehdi told us was about the collusion between Ukrainian SBU and western NGOs. You know, the same human rights groups that are constantly cited by mainstream media about the situation in Ukraine. As it turns out, these groups are total assets of Ukrainian intelligence. But we'll let Bekhti tell you about that in greater detail.
Speaker 1: Pardon me, but Europe believes they are in the right. There is an organization in Europe called Human Rights Watch. It is based in Switzerland. I knew their address. I didn't just write to them, you see.
I'll tell you this. I was identifying enemies. Representatives from this Human Rights Watch brought me in to talk to them. The head of the team, Vicente Sladekis, a Lithuanian whose name I still remember, began asking me the same questions the SBU had posed to me the previous two days. I looked him in the eye and replied, I don't want to talk to you.
Please take me back to my cell. He asked, why? I told him, I don't want to talk to you. They took me back to my cell. I sat down and immediately wrote a message to Human Rights Watch.
Your representative, Viekenthas Ladekis, head of the Kharkov Group, is working for the SBU. He is not defending human rights, which according to your own charter is your duty. I sent the message to their office in Geneva officially submitting it to the operational unit and to lawyers. I must emphasize this. Prisons have leaks.
There are always ways to get in and out. The inmates who were behind bars with me only recognized me. Why? Because I didn't present myself as a spy despite the accusations against me. They told me, hey, old timer, if you need anything sent out, just give it to us and we'll get it out there.
Everything was sent through three channels, officially through lawyers and through prison mail. It reached its destination. Vikentas Ladikis was removed about a month later. Good. And there were a few more like him.
Speaker 0: Probably the most elaborate Ukrainian torture center was based in Mariupol. That's where many political prisoners in the Donbas were held. Now the mainstream media has done everything it can to ignore the story. Instead, they've sought to make Mariupol a symbol of Ukrainian resistance. But in reality, Mariupol was an occupied city from 2014 to 2022.
Following the Maidan coup, there was a large popular movement in Mariupol that fought back against the Ukrainian government's efforts to erase for Russian heritage. In response, the Ukrainian government sent tanks in the neo Nazi Azov battalion to crush peaceful protests. And to consolidate the reign of terror, they reopened old KGB prisons as well as some new ones. We spoke to Olga Silevskoye, a former leader of the Mariupol resistance who spent four months in Ukrainian captivity. Here's what she had to say.
Speaker 2: When I was detained, it was almost in the center of the city. They took me to a gypsy settlement on the outskirts of the city and staged a mock execution. After that, they took me to the Mariupol Airport, which was called the library. There, they used torture, suffocation, and waterboarding. They asked various questions.
Did I know anyone from the militia, and where were the caches in Mariupol located? How could anyone get into the catacombs? I stayed there for about a day. I was kept in a freezer room. Thank god it was turned off at that time.
It was a small room. The lighting was on at the time. I remember the setting. I recall everything that was there. There were scratches on the wall.
It was clear that prior to my arrival, they had kept prisoners there who tried to mark the days of their stay in this room, and there were quite a few of these marks. Later, I was transferred to the basements of the SVU, Ukrainian Intelligence. By that time, a case had already been fabricated against me that I was supposedly coming from Berdyansk with ammo in my bag, and I was supposed to meet a contact. Allegedly, I had a technical passport for a cash in transit vehicle from private bank, and this became the reason for my arrest. Although in reality, everything happened quite differently.
I was in the SBU Basements for three days. There were a huge number of people, maybe about 30, maybe even a little more. Everyone was sitting on a cold concrete floor, both men and women. Most of them had signs of torture, bruises on their bodies. Some had large plastic bags tied around their heads, tape around their eyes, and plastic zip ties on their hands.
Moving, talking, or even shifting was strictly prohibited. We were guarded by Azov Battalion combatants. We were only allowed to go to the bathroom. We could drink water only from a washbasin. During those three days, I was taken for interrogations.
The interrogations were harsh. In one of the rooms, I was beaten very badly and ended up with a broken rib. It's very painful. It's terrifying to remember everything that happened there. Most of the people who were taken to be interrogated never returned.
We can only guess what happened to them if such physical violence was used against them. I was held captive for one hundred twenty days. I was periodically taken for interrogations. The place of detention was the Kaminsk pretrial detention center. During these four months, torture was employed, including electric shock.
Later, I learned that they would take me to the SBU basements in Mariupol where the electric shock device was. The same place had a rack. And after the city's liberation, when we got into the basement, we saw traces of blood. This electric shocker device used for torture and the rack were there. The entire torture episode was conducted with a sack over my head.
I couldn't see where they were taking me. I only sensed the electrodes on my body, wet rags were then placed on me, and they hooked up a machine, then something ran through my body. It was extremely painful. My body twisted in agony. It was horrible.
They also practiced adding something to a liquid, such as coffee or tea, and when they offered it, they would add a substance that made people more talkative, more willing to talk. The bulk of the torture happened in places like the library. There were several of them in Mariupol, and they were all called libraries where detainees were brought from the SBU. These places seemed to function below the legal radar, but all the despicable covert work was done by the volunteer battalions. Specifically, in Mariupol, it was the Azov battalion that tortured people to make them more cooperative so they would implicate themselves and others, such as fellow militia members or those involved in organizing the referendum.
Some were at checkpoints, and for some reason, they ended up in these situations. This is what happened in Mariupol. There were many such secret prisons in Ukraine. At that time, we were aware of prisons located in Krumatorsk, Pokrovsk, Kharkov, as well as several others in Western Ukraine. In essence, many large cities housed these secret facilities where individuals deemed inconvenient to the Kyiv government, those who opposed the regime, were subjected to torture.
This included people who wore the Saint George ribbon, supported Russia, or had Russian contacts on their phones, as well as those who had communicated with relatives or friends living in Russia friends living
Speaker 0: Another survivor of secret prisons in Mariupol is Father Fiophan, an Orthodox priest who served at a monastery near the city of Uglidar. Following the start of the Donbas war, Fiophan began trying to help save civilians from Ukrainian troops. In particular, he alerted civilians about the movement of Ukrainian artillery. In 2015, Fiifan was arrested by the SBU and transferred to Mariupol. There, he endured over a month of brutal torture.
Speaker 3: Well, when anyone is carted off for torture, they are tortured in the shooting range of this SBU in this temporary facility. The shooting range is a cold long room, a basement. There is a barrier where the shooters stand and targets with a bullet trap. The space between this barrier and the targets had benches set up like low ones in a gym, they usually seated people there to beat them up and torture them and so on. Well, they first forced me into a chair and tried to break me psychologically asking me, did you do drugs?
I said No. Then one of them told someone Bring the black stuff, we're going to inject him. They were watching my reaction and I thought, well fine and now what? Should I descend into panic? Whatever happens, happens.
They saw it wasn't working. Well, then my hands were cuffed behind my back with prison cuffs. After that, they moved me to a bench and started hitting me randomly while asking various questions like, when did you meet the separatists? When did you start helping them and all sorts of similar questions. During this ordeal, they assaulted me with electric shockers and struck me everywhere possible with a bat.
One time they struck my spine very hard, I had back pain for a long time afterward. It turned out that this wasn't enough for them. They applied water torture, they laid me down on the floor, covered my face with a cloth and cuffed my hands behind my back. Then they began to pour water on me. During this torture episode, they also placed a low bench like in a gym over me.
A rather hefty fighter sat on it and pressed down on my legs so I couldn't move at all, that's how I gradually started to drown. Because during this type of torture, water goes into the lungs while air goes into the esophagus. It's a very terrifying sensation. Afterwards, I struggled for a long time to expel the water from my lungs. It was very difficult and extremely painful.
I spent a total of thirty seven days in captivity.
Speaker 0: And could you please show me
Speaker 1: the instruments of torture, if it's not too hard or too dramatic?
Speaker 3: It's not hard. Here's a drill bit, 39 centimeters long, four millimeters thick. This is the drill bit used to break people's fingers and beat them on the inside of the knee. My cellmate Andrey Sokolov took this drill bit, he hid it in the ventilation, he was there by himself. Andrey ended up there arbitrarily and saw people being beaten with this drill bit, here it's thinner but here it widens and is inserted into the drill, that's why they beat people with this side, it's solid like a rock.
You can imagine how much pain this inflicted on people during those beatings with this drill and when Andre saw all this, he lived in the shooting gallery, he witnessed all these episodes of torture and one day he just hid it in the ventilation and I found it when I was able to go there in 2022. In the 2022, I came with journalists to that SBU department where I had been held before. I brought it back because, well, it's an artifact of history now. Then from a different place, from the airport, from the so called library, I found a jump rope that was used to beat people. It was indeed in the library, in that very room in the freezer and that's where I found it.
And well, who knows, maybe someone got whipped with a jump rope when they were a kid, it's very painful. But when it's done over and over again and for a long time it's truly horrific and here are the handcuffs possibly the very ones that were used to torture me and other people. You can't escape from them, with regular handcuffs you can sometimes twist your way out but here you see, the two cuffs don't allow for any escape, moreover when they are tightened behind your back and someone is laid on the floor, they tighten up even worse, This causes even more terrible unbearable pain. I also took some surveillance cameras from the armory from the room where we were held, they were there. Here they are, these cameras, they have seen a lot.
These surveillance cameras witnessed how someone was killed there because in that armory there was a large dried blood stain on the floor. When we were brought there in 2015 they gathered all of us separatists as they called us. By 2014 many people had already been through there by that time.
Speaker 0: The Ukrainians operated with a combination of cruelty and arbitrariness. We spoke to Alexander Matushin, a former Donbas militiaman and war correspondent that is closely familiar with the prisoner exchange process. He told us that often Ukrainian troops took civilians, not fighters, as prisoners. Both civilian and military prisoners were, of course, tortured in barbaric fashion. Here's what he told us about that.
Speaker 4: We also managed to get people out again. Thanks to some behind the scenes agreements, swaps for Ukrainian prisoners of war. By August, September, we had quite a lot of them due to the encirclement of Ilovsk. That's how we managed to get one girl released. You see, this girl had been gang raped.
When the men were no longer able to rape her and for natural reasons, they they resorted to using objects instead, namely pistols, rifles, anything that they could find. Why was this done? Logically, it makes no sense. Anything she knew, she had already told them. Well, that's because they had beaten her, tortured her, subjected her to unimaginable suffering.
This incomprehensible brutal cruelty permeated nearly all Ukrainian prisons beginning with the Lukhanivska pretrial detention center. On the very first day after the announcement of the referendum, at some point their efforts to hunt down people waned. Before the special military operation during the Minsk agreements period, they were mainly just grabbing people off the streets in order to swap them. While the prisoner swaps were occurring, the Ukrainians frequently traded not only military personnel, but also ordinary civilians whom they pulled off the street, slapped separatism charges on, and put up for exchange. Initially, the Ukrainians revived this practice.
Later, the SBU Ukrainian intelligence got directly involved. So Ukraine's state security agents and Ukrainian law enforcement joined in as well. While I cannot confirm the current state of affairs, I have heard of alarming several cases. People told me that in Ukraine, many are often presented with a stark choice, either voluntarily enlist with the Ukrainian armed forces or face being labeled an enemy of the state resulting in imprisonment on charges of treason or similar offenses. And if a person isn't politically active in any way, no one will advocate for their exchange.
Also, existence of torture prisons in Ukraine has enabled the seizure of businesses. Individuals are often labeled as enemies of the state. Their business is seized and resold and they end up imprisoned. And since these individuals were not activists or one of ours, they are left to languish in prison, forgotten. It's entirely possible that they could have cared less about Ukraine or Russia.
They were simply going about their lives. However, no one will ever advocate for their release, and their relatives won't even be able to contact our authorities. Everything is blocked, so no one can write anywhere. Therefore, a person just vanishes behind bars. But right now in Ukraine, many prisoners except those convicted of treason have the option to get out of jail by agreeing to go to the front.
Those who find themselves in the torture chambers of Ukrainian nationalists endure a living hell marked by relentless suffering and torment. And the closer anyone gets to the front line, the more of these torture sites you'll find. In every liberated settlement, there is invariably a torture chamber where people suffered abuse. Before retreating, the perpetrators executed their prisoners to cover their tracks. Take any recently liberated city, for example, Selidov or Skuharhkove.
I am confident that our fighters will conduct a thorough sweep, complete the demining process, and inspect every building. They will likely uncover a basement where people were tortured and executed before the enemy withdrew. So the Ukrainians would enter a community and would start picking out their informants and intermediaries, people who would drop the dime on others stating things like this person wore a Saint George ribbon on May 9, and these individuals organized the referendum. That referendum took place across the Donetsk People's Republic including in Krasnoyarmyysk, now Pokrovsk. The referendum ended on May 11, the same day Ukrainian volunteer battalions entered Donbas.
Locals would say these individuals organized the referendum, attended rallies, and wore Saint George ribbons. This is how the Ukrainians compiled their database. They rounded up these individuals and imprisoned them. That scene in the film Sunburn where a guy sits in a cage at a Ukrainian volunteer battalion base, his legs broken from torture, all because he wore a Saint George ribbon. That's not fiction.
It happened many times. The horrors I saw in 2014, liberating settlements. The mind blocks out memories like that. I don't even want to talk about it. The sheer brutality was beyond comprehension.
They targeted civilians first. Soldiers only ended up captured later, if they were surrounded or if they surrendered out of fear or injury. Yes. There were captured soldiers among our ranks. Some were shell shocked.
Some gave up because they saw no point in fighting. Some were just scared. It happened. People went to war without realizing what war really was, and they found themselves in captivity. But the Ukrainians primarily built their prisoner exchange pool from civilians, and not everyone among them necessarily supported the Donetsk People's Republic DPR.
A local informant working for the Ukrainians might have just been settling personal scores. Someone could have been framed. Once arrested, that person would be sent off to be brutalized. Under torture, they'd say anything to make it stop. They'd admit to supporting the referendum, to personally knowing Putin to whatever was needed.
That's how it worked. Many completely innocent people who never even supported the DPR ended up in those torture chambers because informants exploited the system to settle personal vendettas.
Speaker 0: This problem became much worse after the start of the Russia Ukraine conflict in 2022. Ukrainian troops adopted a systematic policy of war crimes against Russian POWs. Many of you may have seen videos where Ukrainian troops execute Russian prisoners on camera, but there was also a lot of torture behind the scenes. Olga worked with Russian POWs firsthand, and here's what she had to say.
Speaker 2: They became more sophisticated. Not only before the SMO special military operation were they able to burn symbols of the USSR like the star on people's bodies, but they also resorted to sexual violence. Later, after the onset of the SMO, I encountered many cases where young Russian boys were castrated. They returned these boys castrated, even according to the testimonies of our guys who participated in the SMO. They talked about prisons where they were sent They called them concentration camps.
In Western Ukraine, individuals who were captured, whether by the Ukrainian Armed Forces or Volunteer Battalions, at first experienced a period without physical violence, torture or mistreatment. However, they are eventually transferred to these concentration camps, which are located in Central Or Western Ukraine. The treatment of the detainees in these facilities is downright horrible. They endure poor conditions and abuse.
Speaker 0: The testimonies that we presented today are just the tip of the iceberg. There is enough evidence of Ukrainian war crimes and political repression to fill several thick volumes numbering hundreds of pages each. The Russian people of Ukraine have been through hell for more than ten years. That's why Putin sent troops into Ukraine back in February 2022. It wasn't about imperial ambitions.
It was about stopping a crazed totalitarian state from murdering and torturing its own people. This is why opposing Ukraine is a moral imperative. A regime that rapes and castrates its political opponents shouldn't be receiving hundreds of billions of dollars, and they most certainly shouldn't be receiving high-tech weapons. This is why raising awareness about the true nature of the Ukrainian regime is so important. If you found this video informative, please like and repost it.
This will go a long way in helping us to expose the truth about what's really happening in Ukraine. Thank you all for tuning in. Till next time.
@occultni - sLOVen
Ukraine General Yan Kazemirovich: Zionists & Masonic Mafia now control Ukraine (07.03.2015) https://t.co/zn0JfFdDHP
Video Transcript AI Summary
I declare for those who will watch or are watching this information: Mr. Pruchinov, Mr. Yatsenyuk, Mr. Tekhnebok, and those with them — I know openly and reliably that these are funded agents of the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. In addition, Mr. Yatsenyuk is the first deputy head of the Freemason lodge in Ukraine, and its head, if anyone doesn’t know, is Mr. Pinchuk, the son-in-law of Mr. Kuchma. All the deceptions that were carried out and all the commands of Mr. Yanukovych were simply puppetry in the hands of Mr. Honchuk, the best and Kravchuk. They sold him as well. They gave him commands—don’t let Berkut in, then let Berkut in, then storm or not storm—and then, when people were finally allowed to take up arms, their vile betrayal. Primarily it’s the work of Mr. Kravchuk and Mr. Kuchma. Not many know that Mr. Kuchma, after the so-called victory in the Maidan revolution, was targeted thanks to Mr. Pinchuk. The Americans lifted the arrest on his accounts, and he lives freely.
And after they sold Yanukovych, I’m not saying he’s good; I’m not his admirer. He was wrong in many ways. Although he remains the legitimate president, whether we want it or not, whether those stinkers-who-smell, or not. I’m tired of listening, of not listening. Anyone can insult a person. But first we must understand what prompted this. What was the motive?
The main lawlessness was committed by Mr. Rinat Akhmetov, Mr. Kolomoyskyi, the head of the World Jewish Congress, Mr. Fer t ash, and others. All these oligarchs. At first, it looked like two clans fighting for a feeding trough, as in 2005. Now it’s simply a direct occupation of Ukraine by the United States through stand-ins. I’m not afraid of this; I have enough strength to defend myself. But my wife remains there. And not only my wife. There are many people who want to threaten Russia. Many want help from Russia to cleanse Holy Rus from the invasion of red-brown plague and American Zionists.
I am not an anti-Semite, God forbid; I am an internationalist. I was raised in the spirit of Soviet internationalism. But let people not confuse. I have no hatred for simple Jews. They are not to blame. They also endure from their landlords, so to speak, Orthodox Jewish organizations, Hasidim, in particular, organizations like Chabad, which rule this black feast. So let no one accuse me of anti-Semitism. But, in the end, I can say, as they say in Odessa, who are Semites and who are anti-Semites. You know? No, tell me.
Semites are those who drink until seven; anti-Semites are those who drink after seven. This is how they say in Odessa. I love Odessa humor, genuine old Odessa humor. But I hate what they do. Imagine a scene on the Maidan: representatives of the Greek-C Catholic Church stand; representatives of the so-called autocephalous, self-proclaimed church, who during the war walked around showing to the Germans, to those in the family at the front children, in the partisans and so on. Also the so-called False Patriarchate of Kyiv, which papal Rome did not recognize in its time, led by Mr. Mykhailo Denysenko, who still calls himself Filaret, and is anathemized for sacrilegious acts and many other offenses against the church. Now he tries to join a secret assembly with Right Sector, in particular with such fascist organization as Svoboda. This is their true name; the Social-National Party of Ukraine. So that all may know: Svoboda is simply because they realized they cannot appeal on their own to politics, so they will go under their true banner. Then there is a law draft, a deputy-Briton, I think; I’m not strong with names, but I know it is 100 percent the bill banning the Moscow Patriarchate. Prohibition of the Russian language in Ukraine, up to criminal prosecution. All this is the work of ultraright forces with the support of American fascists, so to speak. World imperialism. That’s it.
Maybe I’m not a skilled speaker, but I’ve had enough. I’ll repeat: it sounds banal. Thank you very much.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Заявляю для тех, кто смотрит, будет смотреть эту информацию. Господин Пручинов. Господин Яценюк. Господин Технебок. Иже с ними я это заявляю открыто и достоверно знаю что это проплаченные агенты Центрального Разведоуправления США.
Кроме того, господин Еценюк является первым заместителем главы масонской ложи в Украине. А главой масонской ложи, если кому-то неизвестно, является господин Пинчук. Зять господина Кучмы. И все вот эти вот обманы, которые производились, и все команды господина Янукович это просто марионетка в руках господина Гончука, лучшего и Кравчука. Они же его и продали.
Они же ему давали команды не то пускай беркут то не пускай беркут то пусть штурмует то пусть не штурмует а потом когда людям в конце концов было разрешено взять оружие в руки их подлу предали. В первую очередь дело рук господина Кравчука и господина Кучмы. Это их их рук дело. Потому что мало кому известно, что господина Кучму после победы, так называемой победы по Маранчевой революции, тронули благодаря господину Пинчуку. Американцы вернули ему деньги.
То есть сняли арест с его счетов, и он себе спокойно живет. А то, что после того, как продали господина Янукорича, Я не говорю, что он хороший, я не его поклонник. Он не женщина, чтобы я его любил или ненавидел. Но он был во многом неправ. Хотя он остается легитимным президентом, хотим мы этого или не хотим, хотят этого бандерлоги вонючие или не хотят.
Мне уже надоело слушать, не слушать. Оскорблять человека любой может. Но прежде всего надо разобраться. Что побудил? Какова причина?
Ведь мало кто знает, что основной беспредел творил господин Ахметов Ренат Леонидович, господин Коломойский, глава Всемирного еврейского конгресса, господин Фирташ и иже с ними. Все вот эти олигархи. Вначале это выглядело как обычно, два клана дрались за кормушку, как было в 2005 году. А теперь это просто прямая оккупация Соединенными Штатами Украины через подставных лиц. Я этого не боюсь, мне бояться нечего.
У меня, слава Богу, хватит сил за себя отстоять. Но вот супруга моя осталась там. И не только супруга. Есть очень много людей, которые хотят припугнуть к России. Очень много людей хотят просто помощи от России, дабы очистить святую Русь от нашествия красно-коричневой чумы и американских сионистов.
Я не антисемит, прости бог, я интернационалист. Я человек, воспитанный в духе советского интернационализма. Но пусть люди не путают. Я к простым евреям никакой ненависти не испытываю. Они ни в чем не виноваты.
Они также терпят от своих нагнатов так называемых ортодоксальных иудейских организаций, хасидов, в частности, организаций Хабат, которая правит всем этим черным пиром. Так что пусть не обвиняет меня никто в антисемитизме. Но, в конце концов, я могу сказать, как в Одессе говорят, кто такие семиты, а кто такие антисемиты. Вам известно? Нет, скажите.
Семиты это те, кто пьет до семи, антисемиты, которые после семи. Это как говорят в Одессе. Я люблю одесский юмор, настоящий, старый одесский юмор. Но я ненавижу того, что творят. Вот представьте себе сцена на майдане.
Стоят представители греко-католической церкви, стоят представители так называемой автокефальной, самосвятой, которые во время войны ходили и показывали немцам, у этих в семье на фронте дети, у этих в партизанах и т. И т. П. Так же представители так называемого Лжепатриархата Киевского, которого не признал даже в свое время папа римский. Во главе с господином Михаилом Денисенко, который себя до сих пор называет почему-то филаретом, а анафеме предан за клятвопреступления и за многие другие притчи перед церковью матери.
Сейчас он пытается уже вступил в тайный сбор с правым сектором, в частности, с такой фашистской организацией, как Свобода. Это ШИМ, настоящее ее название, Социал-националистическая партия Украины. Чтобы все знали, Свобода это просто они поняли, что они не смогут выйти на политическую арену, что они будут идти под своей истинной вывеской. Потом они вынесли закон. Есть такой депутат-брегенец, по-моему, я не помню, не силён в этих названиях, но я знаю, что это сто процентов слово законопроект о запрещении московского патриархата.
Запрет русского языка на Украине вплоть до уголовного преследования. Это все дело рук ультраправых при поддержке американских фашистов, скажем так. Иначе их не не могут назвать. Мирового империализма. Вот и все.
Может я не так, я не мастер говорить, но просто у меня уже наболело. Еще раз повторюсь, это звучит банально. Спасибо большое.
@gregreese - Greg Reese
The New World Order https://t.co/HieeIGWIeG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United Nations emblem uses a projection map centered on the North Pole, chosen in 1945 when the UN was founded and the Arctic was strategically irrelevant. Today, the Arctic is described as the world’s most contested zone, with the map’s North Pole center aligned with terrain that major powers are scrambling for.
Russia’s narrative centers on a coming pole shift that would thaw parts of Siberia and the Arctic coastline, with Russia controlling approximately 53%. Russia is described as having invested over $35,000,000,000 developing the Northern Sea route (NSR), which saves fifteen days of travel versus the Suez Canal route, for a future Arctic civilization.
The United States is described as having a limited Arctic footprint compared to Russia, with a narrative shifting from man-made global warming to climate change. The US is said to be hurrying to meet a 2030 deadline and seeking to acquire Canada and Greenland to dominate the Northwest Passage, characterized as an alternative Arctic trade route to Russia’s NSR.
Europe is described as expanding NATO to include Arctic states Sweden and Finland. In January 2025, the European Union established the European Polar Coordination Office (EPCO) in Sweden’s Arctic region. China’s Arctic engagement is described through its Polar Silk Road, an extension of the Belt and Road Initiative in polar waters. China is said to have declared itself a near Arctic state and to be investing in Russia’s Arctic projects in exchange for access. In 2025, China is described as completing a record number of container voyages through Russia’s NSR and designating the Arctic as a strategic new frontier.
The transcript frames the current period as the most consequential reorganization of world power since 1945, with the geological advantage for nations centered in the Arctic. It describes a new multipolar world order forming alongside a new financial system where energy, food, and metals become reserve assets. The major players are portrayed as constructing financial systems designed to function independently and internationally.
Examples provided include: Hedera’s digital hashgraph in the USA, governed by institutions including Google, IBM, Boeing, LG, and FedEx, described as a faster, more programmable upgrade that works along with stablecoins such as USDC. In China, CIPS (launched in 2015 as a Swift alternative) is described as handling clearing and settlement, and the digital Yuan is said to have reached 2,250,000,000 wallets. mBridge is described as a multi-CBDC platform developed with Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE for direct settlement between digital currencies. In Russia, the digital ruble and a card payment system are described as having nearly half a billion cards and processing two thirds of domestic transactions, while SPFS is described as Russia’s Swift alternative connected to 557 financial institutions in 20 countries.
The transcript describes four emerging blocs: an American bloc seeking to include all of North America, Latin America, and Greenland; a Middle East conflict zone; a Russian bloc seeking former Soviet states plus parts of Africa and the Balkans; a Chinese bloc seeking South and Southeast Asia plus parts of Africa; and a European bloc seeking the core EU and surrounding periphery. It concludes that these events are presented as the controlled demolition of the unipolar world order and the birth pangs of the new multipolar world order, with all roads leading to the bank for international settlements in Basel, Switzerland.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United Nations emblem uses a projection map which is centered on the North Pole. This projection was chosen in 1945 when the UN was founded and the Arctic was strategically irrelevant. Today, it has become the world's most contested zone. The center of the UN's map is precisely the terrain that every major power is now scrambling for. The Russian narrative is that a coming pole shift will thaw parts of Siberia and the Arctic coastline, of which Russia controls approximately 53%.
The Northern Sea route, the NSR, saves fifteen days of travel compared to the Suez Canal route. Russia has already invested over $35,000,000,000 developing this area for a future Arctic civilization. The narrative in The United States, which has a limited Arctic footprint compared to Russia, has been more desperate. Its story began as man made global warming, now simplified to climate change. The US is hurrying to meet a 2030 deadline and is looking to acquire Canada and Greenland, which would give it the ability to dominate the Northwest Passage, the alternative Arctic trade route to Russia's NSR.
The European Union has expanded NATO to include Arctic states, Sweden, and Finland. In January 2025, the EU established the European Polar Coordination Office, EPCO, in Sweden's Arctic region. China's Arctic engagement can be found in their Polar Silk Road, an extension of the Belt and Road Initiative in polar waters. China has declared itself a near Arctic state and has been investing in Russia's Arctic projects in exchange for access. In 2025, it has completed a record number of container voyages through Russia's NSR and designates the Arctic as a strategic new frontier.
We are living through the most consequential reorganization of world power since 1945 and the geological advantage for all nations is clearly centered in the Arctic region. The new multipolar world order is forming and with it, a new financial system is being built. A new world order in which energy, food, and metals become the new reserve assets. Each of the major players is constructing financial systems designed to function independently as well as internationally. In The USA, there is Hedera's digital hashgraph, which is governed by institutions including Google, IBM, Boeing, LG, and FedEx.
Hedera is not a replacement for the dollar. It is a faster, more programmable upgrade of the US dollar system that works along with stablecoins such as USDC. In China, there is CIPS, cross border interbank payment system, which was launched in 2015 as a swift alternative. But unlike swift, which only handles messaging, CIPS handles actual clearing and settlement. There is also the digital Yuan, which has already reached 2,250,000,000 wallets, more than China's entire population.
And there is mBridge, China's most ambitious project, a multi CBDC platform developed with Hong Kong, Thailand, and The UAE, allowing direct settlement between digital currencies. In Russia, is the digital ruble and the mere card payment system, which has issued nearly half a billion cards and processes two thirds of all domestic transactions. SPFS, system for transfer of financial messages, is Russia's swift alternative and is now connected to 557 financial institutions in 20 countries. There are four emerging blocs in this multipolar world order. The American bloc, which is looking to include all of North America, Latin America, and Greenland.
The Middle East is being fought for right now. The Russian block is looking to include much of its former Soviet states as well as parts of Africa and the Balkans. The Chinese block is looking to include South And Southeast Asia as well as parts of Africa. And the European bloc is looking to include the core EU and its surrounding periphery. What appears to be a series of unrelated events is more likely the controlled demolition of the unipolar world order and the birth pangs of the new multipolar world order.
And through a pipeline of central banks and private think tank institutions, all roads lead to the bank for international settlements in Basel, Switzerland. Greg Reiss reporting. The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreiss.substack.com.