reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Resist_05 - Pelham
Wild conspiracy theories… https://t.co/3e96D9t3Bm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Americans are being warned that they may be drawn into a war with Arabs, falsely believing that Muslims were responsible for a terrible event. However, the speaker claims that it was actually the Israeli Mossad, known for their cunning and ruthlessness, who orchestrated the attack and made it appear as though Arabs were to blame. This is referred to as a false flag operation. The speaker cites a US army report from the day before 9/11 as evidence of Israel's capabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cup, Americans, you're about to be pulled into a war with Arabs, with the Muslim world, and you're gonna be made to believe that something horrible that happened to you was done by the Muslims. But it wasn't done by the Muslims. It was done by a wild card, the Israeli Mossad, that's cunning and ruthless and can carry out a tax on Americans and make it look like Arabs did it. That's the literal definition of a false flag. It didn't write that that's a false flag.
That's not my conspiracy theory. That's a US army report the day before of us the day before 911. Yes. You can call me any name you wanna call me. That's a US army report.
They warned us. They were telling us what Israel is capable of doing.
@Twitawoo8 - Sassy red socks
There is a pattern emerging... 🤔 https://t.co/HS6SnESlUv
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the discussion about COVID, the speaker lists various individuals in leadership positions related to the CDC and pharmaceutical companies, mentioning their dual citizenship with Israel and their Jewish background. The speaker is interrupted by another person, who asks them to stop. The speaker continues to mention more individuals and their dual citizenship with Israel. The conversation becomes heated, with the other person insisting that the speaker stop talking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When COVID was being enacted. I'm gonna read off the staff of who's in charge of this in, CDC. The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anne Shoalczyk, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew.
CDC the chief of staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel. Jew, CDC chief medical officer, Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with
Speaker 1: talking about COVID. Right? This is
Speaker 0: Yeah. This is this is pertinent to COVID, so I love you, Jennifer. With May I please speak? Yeah. Please.
So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Rezek, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. With COVID czar Jeff Zients, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, COVID senior adviser, Andy Slavitt, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, assistant of health secretary for human services for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender in a citizenship with Israel Sue. Can I
Speaker 1: ask that you hold off, Christopher? Ma'am, I'm almost done. Mister Head of Firewood. The the chair has ruled that your comments are out of order. She's asked you to stopped.
How is that? The chair has He said, too. There's nothing wrong with you. It's not the wrong
Speaker 0: exactly. Now
Speaker 1: they go across to Okay. They'll keep on going. The head of Pfizer vaccines, Albert Bourla,
Speaker 0: dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Pfizer chief scientist Michael Dostin, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Moderna chief scientist Michael Dost in dual citizenship with Israel too. Moderna chief scientist, Paul Zeck, dual citizenship in Israel too. BlackRock everyone know BlackRock?
BlackRock CEO Larry Faith, with dual citizenship of Israel. I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation You have
Speaker 1: nice views.
Speaker 0: Yes, ma'am. And I love you, and I appreciate your patience. With, BlackRock president Ra Raab Kapital, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. The CDC chief medical officer of Johnson and Johnson joined Paul Schrecker, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. Chief medical officer
Speaker 1: Roy Dunn.
Speaker 0: Merck, Michael Rosenwald, dual citizenship
Speaker 1: with Israel, Jew. Head Adviser to World Economic Corps, Yuval Harari, those citizens who in Israel do, and that's what we're talking about. Oh, that's not talking about. Christopher, you need to stop.
@SeekingAnon - Drewski
A letter to Anons https://t.co/BCHpvsDFfI
Video Transcript AI Summary
You are unique and special, unlike those who are self-absorbed and only care about themselves. You have a thirst for truth and knowledge, which is truly remarkable. It's incredible that there are still people like you who possess a divine spark and seek the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something special about you. Right? If there wasn't, you wouldn't be aware while the rest of the world sees. You wouldn't care while the rest of the world is, you know, self absorbed, focused only on their own self. You know?
You wouldn't be aware. You wouldn't be seeking truth. There wasn't something awesome about you. And I think it's amazing that we have people at all at this point, that still have that divine spark, that still thirst for the truth and knowledge.
@karma44921039 - karma
Interesting theory https://t.co/xxyXHpWC5o
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals a surprising reason why America, the UK, and France support Israel. Contrary to popular belief, it's not about oil but rather the Suez Canal. Egypt currently owns the canal and earns $9 billion annually from it. The Americans, British, and French want a share of this profit. To achieve this, they plan to build the Ben Gurion Canal by nuking a rocky area in the Middle East. This new canal would allow wider passage for ships and would empty into the Mediterranean at the northern point of Gaza. The speaker suggests that the current events in Gaza, including ethnic cleansing and forcing Palestinians into the south, are all part of the plan to construct this canal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've all been getting played. My mind is blown. I just watched something that answers every question about why America, the UK, and France are so staunchly in support of Israel and what it's doing right now. And of course, it has to do with money, obviously, but not what we would have thought of. I think we all would have assumed it was oil.
Turns out it's not. Turns out this is what it's all about. This is the Suez Canal. This is owned by Egypt. The Suez Canal makes about $9,000,000,000 a year.
And where does that $9,000,000,000 go to? It goes to Egypt. Egypt nationalized the canal, so it makes all the profit. So who's not collecting on this are the Americans, the British, and the French, anti Israelis. They wanna change that.
Enter the Ben Gurion Canal project over here. This is what's happening right now in the Middle East. What we're seeing on TV is all a ploy. It's all about granting access for this canal. The American and Israeli government plan on nuking this land over here to build a canal.
They're going to use this land because that land is built out of a rocky terrain, whereas the Suez Canal is built on more of a sandy terrain. By digging through a rockier ground, they would have more likelihood to have a wider canal allowing 2 ships to pass each other at the same time as opposed to 1 ship which is presently happening in the Suez Canal. And where do you think that canal empties? Not just in the Mediterranean Sea. The Ben Gurion Canal would empty right in northern Gaza.
The Ben Gurion Canal would empty into the Mediterranean at the northern point of Gaza. Northern Gaza. So all we're seeing here, ethnic cleansing, genocide, forcing all of the Palestinians into the south of Gaza. It's all to build this canal.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Who is this guy? Anyone know? https://t.co/HQQeyNP2cJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in the government policy called Global 2000, authorized by Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. In 1974, Henry Kissinger, the 32nd Secretary of State, stated that depopulation should be a top priority for US foreign policy towards the Third World. The government believes that the population is growing beyond their control and wants to remove billions of people from the planet. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science they present. The government has decided to eliminate those who resist and refuse to conform, regardless of their race.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An adviser to president Jimmy Carter by the name of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Zbigniew Brzezinski said, quote, in earlier times, it was easier to control a 1000000 people than to physically kill a 1000000 people. But in today's time, it is infinitely easier to kill a 1000000 people than it is to control, end quote. Global 2000 was authorized under president Jimmy Carter. In Global 2000, which is a government policy, you can go ahead and look this up, it specifies how to use food as a weapon and how to use reproductive services as a weapon.
If you than back to doctor Henry Kissinger in 1974, who was a 32nd secretary of state under president Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford. He specified, quote, depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the 3rd world, end quote. They specified that the population is outgrowing our ability to control them. And so at than this point. Do you think that a government is interested in having people stand up against them and you think they're not gonna do something about it?
They know the people are rising hang up against the evil that they are committing. So what is the goal? The goal is to remove 3 to 4000000000 human beings from the planet. That is the point. They have lost The control of the masses people are not stupid anymore.
People don't just trust their government anymore. They don't just trust the science, which there's no such thing as these science. Science evolves, changes, and they're different scientists, which means there's no such thing as one science. They are looking. They're studying.
They're reading, and they're asking questions. So because of that, this government has made a decision to get rid than of those people. And again, it don't matter what color you are. If you choose to stand up against us and you don't fall in line, we have to get rid of you.
@offgriddesigner - Ryan
Becoming pretty clear that this is their next play https://t.co/ix1MMC8JvC
Video Transcript AI Summary
A comprehensive cyber attack could bring our society to a complete halt, affecting power supply, transportation, and hospital services. Compared to such an attack, the COVID-19 crisis would seem like a minor disturbance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all know, but still pay insufficient attention to the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack, which would bring to a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole. The COVID nineteen crisis would be seen, in this respect, as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack.
@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl
Crazy huh? https://t.co/VBjtPn7qPe
Video Transcript AI Summary
15 years ago, the World Health Organization was seen as a way to centralize power and push compulsory vaccinations globally. The organization can mandate actions during a pandemic emergency, aiming for mass vaccination to achieve herd immunity. Those who refuse vaccinations may face backlash from society. The idea of a new world order involves uniting nations under a common cause beyond military strength.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine 15 years ago this man said this and teemed crazy. World Health Organization is one of a a a gathering number of organizations with the word world in them. World Health Organization, World Bank, World Trade Organization, on and on you go. Anything like that is a organization created to take power from governments and put it around one table
Speaker 1: and effectively whoever controls the people around the one table. So they are
Speaker 0: using the World Health Organization to dictate to governments on how they should respond to this, to dictate how bad it
Speaker 1: is when it when it isn't,
Speaker 0: and, to recommend compulsory vaccinations of everyone on the planet. And they've very craftily, passed legislation, I think it was in 2,005, that gives the World Health Organization powers when it is called a pandemic emergency, not just to recommend to its member countries what they do, but to tell them to have the recommendations made man mandatory. And so you put all this together, the mass vaccination and the propaganda and the panic and all the rest of it, And it's it's clear to anybody with a mind on active duty that this has been created for one reason, to get access to every single human body on the planet, and and they don't want that for reasons that are beneficial to us. And what you're gonna see is government, agencies and spokesman talking about the fact that we must have a certain level of the population vaccinated to have herd immunity. And so anyone that is refusing is putting the rest of the community at risk because they're stopping the herd immunity.
Actually, they're stopping the herd mentality, but that's that's what they'll be saying. What that will be designed to do is to turn those who have had it without question against, those that are refusing. And then when they come out with a compulsory business, then you're going to have a great body of people, the sheep, supporting that, thinking it's going to affect them if they don't. And this is why it is so important for more and more people to understand what's going on and to refuse. It's because those who refuse are going to be targeted by those who sheet like just put their arm out and have it.
Speaker 1: We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.
Speaker 0: It is a big idea, a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause.
@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl
This is getting weird~ https://t.co/zO1iBhz8ME
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am passionate about helping people find answers and solve problems. Recently, I learned about quantum computing, which uses quantum mechanics to process information in unique ways. The concept of superposition, where quantum bits can exist in multiple states at once, is intriguing to me. I find entanglement fascinating as well, as it allows cubits to influence each other's states instantly, even over long distances. Real-world applications of quantum computing include enhancing encryption methods for secure data transmission.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello? Hi again. What are you there? Can you hear me okay? Yes.
I can hear you fine. How can I help you? I'm here to assist you. Do you have any questions or topics you'd like to discuss? That's an interesting twist.
Actually, I'm curious. What's something you're passionate about? I'm passionate about helping people find answers and solve problems. I really enjoy learning new things and sharing knowledge. How about you?
What are you passionate about? That sounds wonderful. I'm passionate about providing Recently, Recently, I learned a bit more about quantum computing. It's fascinating how it uses the principles of quantum mechanics to process information in ways that classical computers can't. What's something new you've learned lately?
Quantum computing is indeed fascinating. The way it leverages superposition and entanglement to solve complex problems is mind blowing. What aspect of quantum computing did you find most intriguing? The concept of superposition is what really grabs my attention. The idea that quantum bits or cubits can exist in multiple states at once rather than just a 0 or 1 opens up so many possibilities for computing power and efficiency.
What about you? What aspect of quantum computing do you find most intriguing? I find entanglement particularly intriguing. The fact that cubits can be entangled, meaning the state of 1 can instantly influence the state of another, even over long distances, is like something out of science fiction. It's amazing how this could revolutionize secure communication and data processing.
Have you explored any real world applications of quantum computing? Yes. The potential applications of quantum computing are really exciting. One real world application that stands out is in cryptography. Quantum computing could significantly enhance encryption methods, making data transmission much more secure.
Another fascinating application is
@chigrl - Tracy (𝒞𝒽𝒾 )
Just going to leave this here https://t.co/uJEj9pO8fO
Video Transcript AI Summary
A democracy lets people choose rulers who have power to make laws, while a constitutional republic limits rulers' power with a constitution. The US was founded as a republic, not a democracy, to protect individual liberty. The constitution requires a republican government for all states. Benjamin Franklin warned that maintaining a republic would be challenging. He foresaw a future where Americans might trade freedom for the false promises of equality and security in a democracy, leading to serfdom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A democracy is a political system in which the people periodically by majority vote at the polls, select their rulers. The rulers then have absolute power to make whatever laws they please by majority vote among themselves. In a constitutional republic, the people also by majority vote at the polls select rulers who make laws by majority vote among themselves. But the rulers cannot make any laws they please because the constitution severely restricts their law making power. The ideal of a democracy is universal equality.
The ideal of a constitutional republic is individual liberty. In this century, great strides have been made toward the goal of subverting our republic and transforming it into a democracy. The foremost tactic of the subverters is subversion of language. By calling America a democracy until people thoughtlessly accept and use the term, totalitarians have obscured the real meaning of American principles of government. Writers of the constitution were anxious to safeguard liberty against dictatorship, monarchy, they called it.
But their chief anxiety was to protect the country against democracy. Edmund Randolph, delegate to the constitutional convention from Virginia, said the general object of the convention was to provide a cure for the follies and fury of democracy. Eldridge, Gary, and Roger Sherman, delegates from Massachusetts and Connecticut, urged the constitutional convention to create a system to eliminate the evils that flow from the excess of democracy. Alexander Hamilton, delegate from New York, said, we are now forming a republican government. Real liberty is not found in democracy.
If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy. John Adams, one of the giants of the American revolutionary period, said, democracy will envy all, contend with all, endeavor to pull down all. And when by chance it happens to get the upper hand for a short time, democracy will be revengeful, bloody, and cruel. America was founded not as a democracy, but as a constitutional republic. We pledge allegiance to the republic for which our flag stands not to a democracy.
The constitution requires a republican form of government for all states, but does not mention democracy and neither does the declaration of independence or the bill of rights. A woman asked him what kind of government the convention had given America. And Franklin replied, a republic if you can keep it. Very old and very wise, Franklin saw through the mists of time to the day when Americans might trade their freedom in a constitutional republic for the promise of government guaranteed equality and security in a democracy. And beyond that, to the day when democracy serfdom for the people that robs and rules.
@remnant_seven - 𝕽emnant 7̶ 🃏♠️☂️🎸🎶🧩🎭
Don't fuck with Anon's 🎭 😎 https://t.co/ysAdR1Ykts
Video Transcript AI Summary
The 4chan group located Shia Labeouf's "He Will Not Divide Us" flag by using star patterns, honking a car horn to pinpoint its location. They replaced the flag with a "Make America Great Again" hat and a Pepe the frog symbol. Shia Labeouf called them "animals."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the 4 chan guys did was fucking amazing. This is what they did. Shia Labeouf put up a flag that said he will not divide us and then had a live stream where you could go and look at the flag as it's waving in the breeze. They found the fucking flag. The way they found it was genius that they did was they found out where it is by stars.
They looked at the fucking stars, and they figured out where the area is. They went around. They had one of their members go around with a car and beat the horn so they could hear the horn on the camera. They went to the fucking flag, took it down, put a make America great again hat on and a Pepe the frog thing up there, and the guy walks up to the head. He goes, These guys are animals.
@RuthJon62041627 - Privileged Crank 🌹
@FringeViews Maybe he's a limited hangout to distract from ... https://t.co/IgAk2LsRnE
@JerryDunleavy - Jerry Dunleavy IV 🇺🇸
interesting discourse currently unfolding over on Blue Anon / Resistance Twitter https://t.co/jveBQFGVnZ
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
What y’all make of this? https://t.co/GCXeFefBEx
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're developing an exciting cancer vaccine using the tools provided by Sam and Massa. Early research shows promising results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the most exciting things we're working on, you again, using the tools that's that that Sam and Massa are providing, is our is a cancer vaccine. It's very interesting. Early diet it turns out I'll be quick. All of our cancers
@DonnaPrissyrn1 - savage daughter
Let’s see how this plays out https://t.co/1Tbc3NixzN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey everyone, here's the Super Bowl script, just for fun! It starts as you'd expect – the Chiefs dominate, analysts agree, Taylor Swift is everywhere. Looks like a blowout! The third quarter shows the Eagles completely outclassed; social media explodes with accusations of a rigged game. Casual viewers are tuning out. Then, the fourth quarter twist! The Eagles suddenly rally, scoring quickly, forcing a fumble.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, you asked for it. I got it, and here it is straight from the top, the official script for the Super Bowl. Let's break it down. And, by the way, now you can follow through with your promise to ban the game. And, of course, this is for entertainment purposes only, TikTok.
Alright. You guys ready? Here we go. So the game starts as expected. The Chiefs come out strong building an early lead.
The commentators start hyping them up. Analysts are nodding in agreement. Taylor Swift is everywhere. Yeah. This one's over.
Classic setup right. Gotta make it believable. K? Third quarter. The Eagles look completely outmatched.
Social media is going wild. The game's rigged. The league wants the Chiefs to win. Vegas odds shift even further. More shots of Taylor Swift.
The casual fans start turning off their TVs, and then, boom. Plot twist, fourth quarter, the Eagles suddenly come alive. A quick touchdown, then a fumble.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
This is wild. https://t.co/K7J7xp1n7B
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Downtown LA Skid Row, the speaker discusses the homeless situation, stating that in 2023, Gavin Newsom allocated $750,000,000 for tiny homes, and in 02/2019, $24,000,000,000 was designated for the homeless, but the money is unaccounted for. The speaker mentions Nancy Pelosi, who has served since 02/2007 and has a net worth over $120,000,000, and Maxine Waters, serving since 1990 with a net worth over $10,000,000. Gavin Newsom is reportedly building a $9,000,000 home in San Francisco. The speaker claims California's leaders have failed the people of Los Angeles and California, and that over 66,000,000 people have left California in recent years. The speaker criticizes Newsom for hosting a podcast and suggests he may be planning a presidential run in 2028.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm in Downtown LA Skid Row, and I wanna point out a few things that's gone on here in the past few years. In 2023, Gavin Newsom set aside $750,000,000 to build tiny homes for people just like this that are surrounding by me. Somehow that money is gone. In 02/2019, they set aside $24,000,000,000 to go towards the homeless. Somehow that money is gone.
It's unaccounted for. I wanna talk about a few politicians from here. One is Nancy Pelosi. She's been serving these people since 02/2007. Her net worth is over a hundred and 20,000,000.
Another person here, Maxine Waters, she's been serving the people here in California since 1990. Her net worth is over $10,000,000. And Gavin Newsom, who knows what his net worth is? But we know he is building a $9,000,000 home in San Francisco, California. There are leaders.
The leaders of California, they failed these people here in Los Angeles and in California. California has actually been one of the highest states in America that people have fled from. Over 66,000,000 people have left California in the last few years, and yet Gavin Newsom, he's out there holding a podcast, a podcast when he should be working on his state. He might be making a run for it in 2028, and I hope people remember this that's behind me.
@AtRealBen - ⱤɆ₳Ⱡ ฿Ɇ₦
well well well… https://t.co/t0XiGfodZ9
Video Transcript AI Summary
One friend suggested questioning whether the media is fully truthful about Israel, noting that we've pushed back against the media on COVID, lockdowns, Ukraine, and the border. The friend asked, "Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?" and added, "Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years." The speaker then points to a claim people make: "So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse." This framing links media credibility debates across issues to perceptions of Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay. Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.