reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@RepTiffany - Rep. Tom Tiffany
The FBI has become a Praetorian Guard protecting wealthy elites over the American people. Follow this thread for 10 examples of their outrageous abuse of power and weaponization against everyday Americans.
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Engoron has ordered Trump and his family to disclose all their entities to a court monitor, former Judge Barbara Jones. NY AG James and Engoron can control their assets without a day in court or a defense. This injustice sets a dangerous precedent for all citizens.
@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸
#Breaking News: Judge Engoron has ordered that Trump and members of his family must disclose all entities they own to a court monitor. The court monitor is Bill Clinton appointed former Judge Barbara Jones. NY AG Leticia James and Judge Engoron are able to work together and completely take control over the assets of Donald Trump and his two sons for a simple civil infraction when he doesn’t even get a day in court or present and defense. This is the worst case of injustice we’ve witnessed in this country. If they can do this to a former President and his family, imagine what they’ll do to you!
@MikeGil21446788 - Mike Gill
This was from the only honest lawyer I had. She warned me I was to be murdered. They then threatened to kill her after going to the US Attorney. The DOJ again in the coverup of the deep state laundering network. READY THEY OWN THE COURTS! It’s where all good patriots go to die. https://t.co/YR2EdZ275W
@Chicago1Ray - Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸
Letitia James doesn't like when her corruption is made public, so do not (RT) this https://t.co/7EowyCJ4G7
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Allegations of Election Fraud and Corruption in Connecticut
In Connecticut, serious allegations of election fraud and corruption have emerged, implicating various officials. Richard Skeletor Blumenthal's un-election is at the center of the controversy, with every Registrar and Town Clerk allegedly involved. Additionally, a sting operation involving 640 defendants raises questions about President Trump's alleged racism. Ted Bromley, despite being fired, continues to work for CT, raising suspicions of bribery. Wilton CT's involvement in accepting Zuckerberg bribes to manipulate the US Senate race is also questioned, with claims of a complicit federal judge. Ted Bromly and Scott Bates are accused of rigging a national election for the US Senate, with involvement from judges, including Clark, and elected officials. The utilization of Tyler Tech, Scytl, ERIC, CISA, and Gartner Group further deepens the allegations.
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
Election fraud in CT. Every single Registrar and Town Clerk is complicit in the CT Un-election of Richard Skeletor Blumenthal. Trump Racist? Shake and Bake on the Sting operation. 640 defendants. Corrupticut Town Clerks. Ted Bromley was fired and is still working for CT. Bribes. Did Wilton CT take the Bribe? Did Wilton take the Zuckerberg bribes to rig the US Senate race in Corrupticut. The Federal Judge is in on it. Turn yourself in. Ted Bromly and Scott Bates rigged a national election for the US Senate. The das are in on it, every Judge including Clark, and all the elected officials. They used Tyler Tech, Scytl, ERIC, CISA, and Gartner Group.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, Johnny Flynn, calls the Wilton registrar to inquire about his missing petitioning candidate signatures. He claims that every town in Connecticut received signatures except Wilton. He accuses the registrar of intentionally destroying the signatures and mentions a lawsuit he filed. Flynn also alleges election fraud in Connecticut and claims to have evidence. The registrar denies receiving any petitions and expresses ignorance about the lawsuit. Flynn accuses the registrar of being involved in a criminal conspiracy and threatens legal action. The conversation ends with both parties unable to resolve the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Calling the Wilton registrar.
Speaker 1: Wilton registrar.
Speaker 0: Hey. Hi. I'm looking for a lady named Karen Burke.
Speaker 1: This is Karen.
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Johnny Flynn. I live in Farwalk, I ran for US Senate in 2022 against Blumenthal and I gave number of petitioning candidate signatures to Ted Bromley who assured me that he forwarded them to you, And I never got anything back, which is alarming since every town in Connecticut did the exact Same thing, both republican and democratic registrars. Neither out of 640 people, Somebody sent it back, which is alarming since I got 57,962 signatures, which are missing. And I was supposed to be on the absentee ballot, but I wasn't.
I was supposed to be on the Normal US senate race ballot, which I wasn't, and then the whole state got mailed an illegal Absentee ballot without my name on it and I have many, many, many votes, but the state says I have 0. So I am one of 12 candidates that got screwed in this fashion And I'm wondering what happened to my petitioning candidate signatures that went to Wilton.
Speaker 1: I don't recall call them ever coming to Wilton?
Speaker 0: Well, you need to find a receipt, write a response. I did sue you guys A year and a half ago, no one responded and it's in the supreme court and it went through the appellate court Where I was called the Trump racist by the head clerk of the Supreme Court and the head clerk of the Appellate court called me a racist, and I'm not. My kids are Spanish. Hello. I ran against Trump in 2020 in the state of Connecticut.
Did anybody know that? No. Because the Petitioning candidate signatures were intentionally destroyed, and Ted Bromley says It's your fault. I said, Ted, where are these signatures? It's the clerk's fault.
I said, really? Because I live in Norwalk. I gave Stanford 3 hun you know, 300. I gave Norwalk 300. I gave Bridgeport 700.
I gave Wilton you know, I have clients in Wilton. I go to Wilton once a week pretty much. I have 3 clients on one street that signed my petition, And I gave them to the state on video. I sued every town in the state in 2022. It's now The end of 2023, no response, and I have proven already that Danbury, hacked Pennsylvania.
K? Southington hacked Wisconsin. Shelton hacked Michigan. Connecticut hacked 20 other states in the 2020 election. I have already proved it.
It is in the appellate brief at the appellate court, and Connecticut did some really bad things, and I've proved it. That's why Denise Merrill resigned. Do you know who she was?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. She resigned in June. I sued Connecticut in October. Prior actually, August. I sued them in August knowing they were falsifying the elections.
It's a sting operation. I'm in on it. I'm the largest litigator in Connecticut That is not an attorney. I have a case on 5 g. 5 g is
Speaker 1: Can you spell spell your last name for
Speaker 0: Flynn, f l y n n. Okay. If you don't respond, I I don't care what you say in your response.
Speaker 1: Know what you want me to
Speaker 0: do. Can't drop you from the lawsuit until you respond, and I won't. But the fact I
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not aware of the lawsuit. Okay. The lawsuit would not be would not be
Speaker 0: You were served.
Speaker 1: With a registrar star voters. It would be filed with the town clerk.
Speaker 0: They were served. Okay? So So hold on. What what you don't know is that the plaintiffs were threatened at gunpoint and told if we don't change our testimony, we will be shot. Do You understand?
Speaker 1: I I still don't see why it's why you're calling me.
Speaker 0: Well, you're in on it if you didn't answer, and you're in on If you didn't fill out my if you didn't return my signatures because Ted Bromley said he sent them to you, and he's director of elections. And they have and and and then you turn to me. He's you know why he resigned?
Speaker 1: I don't really care why he resigned.
Speaker 0: He didn't resign. He was fired. Now we find out he's still working there. After we're told he's fired for his actions, they didn't fire him. They turned they moved him into other department.
Okay? I'm not getting shot in the back of the head because Wilton doesn't respond to my lawsuit because they didn't do whatever they did out. Those are those signatures I gave are a felony. Every single one of those have
Speaker 1: to follow-up with the town clerk.
Speaker 0: Every Single one of the signatures I gave your town is a felony. Do you understand? Every single one.
Speaker 1: I don't believe that I in fact, I know I never received petitions from you.
Speaker 0: Well, you didn't say it. You never answered and said I never got any of these damn Thanks. But why didn't you say that? Do you know who Kate Wall is?
Speaker 1: The lawsuit.
Speaker 0: Do you know who Kate Wall is?
Speaker 1: Who?
Speaker 0: Kate Wells? Kate wall walls? Kate Walls, w a l l s? No. Okay.
She was contacted by Mark Zuckerberg, And she sent hold on. Hold on. Hold on. They sent 39 bribes to the state In Connecticut, Bridgeport got $313. Okay.
Hartford got $343. Norwalk got $51. Did Wilton take the bribe? Yes or no? Did Wilton take the bribe?
I wanna know.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I Is
Speaker 0: that a yes? Is that a yes? Did Wilton take the bribe? You said yeah.
Speaker 1: I said I can't help you. I am unaware of what you are talking about.
Speaker 0: Well, that is not on me. If you guys got the letters And Mark Zuckerberg paid Wilton, and you guys destroyed my documentation. Temptation, I'm one of 12 candidates that got screwed. It's not just me. It's 12 candidates.
Okay? 12.
Speaker 1: I got said. I have no knowledge of what you are
Speaker 0: Well, I've been sending you emails for a year and a half. I've been sending every town emails for a year and a half. I have them. Okay? For you to tell me, you don't know don't know what I'm first select lady 10 times.
I went to your 1st select lady, 10 times. I went to her office. I spoke to the police. The police threatened Me and Wilton.
Speaker 1: Then why don't you why
Speaker 0: I sent the sup I sent
Speaker 1: help you. You
Speaker 0: I sent multiple talk to
Speaker 1: missus Danda Slice then.
Speaker 0: I talked Hold on. I gave you multiple federal subpoenas which were never answered.
Speaker 1: I was never served. I do not know what you are talking about. I cannot help you. You are barking up the wrong tree.
Speaker 0: Guess what? Your answer barking up the wrong tree is a federal crime. Turn yourself in, Honestly, you have no business making a statement like that when you in fact violated Executive order 7WW, by making that statement, you just you turn yourself in. Honestly, Give me a break. Give me a break.
I said to you, the defend the plaintiffs in this lawsuit are threatened. K? Those are voters that signed my petition, they're getting death threats, and one of them had had her stepson Already shot. Did you know that?
Speaker 1: Mister Flynn, I I I just can't to continue this conversation with you because I don't know what you are talking about.
Speaker 0: Well, hold on a second. You have a first select lady. Who Knows. Wilton, Connecticut. Wilton, Connecticut doesn't know what's going on here.
This is a criminal conspiracy of massive Of proportion. Have a great day. She shouldn't be saying I can't help you. She should be saying, what do I have to do to prove our innocence? And I would let Let them out.
Another town. I'm not letting them out till I get a letter saying they don't know, Deb Bromley lied, and no one will do that. Why? Why? Because Connecticut is so dirty and they all know it.
They all know how dirty this State is. Unbelievable.
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
CT' is swindling Bonds through the DA https://t.co/v97Qth3xic
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker from Connecticut discusses an issue with the court system. They explain that they had a court date but were never able to see the judge as they were arrested for criminal trespass instead. They believe that the court is purposely swindling bonds and have witnessed this happen multiple times. The speaker mentions that this is just a test of their new software.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Connecticut. We're having a upgrade of software today and we want to show you on the document reader right here how Connecticut swindles bonds. So for example, if you look on the document reader, it says I had a court date on 12/1. Well, when I got to the doorway. I never saw the judge.
I was tackled. I was arrested falsely again for, this time, criminal trespass. Now This document tells me where I gotta be and when and that's where I was. So how can it be criminal trespass if I never saw the judge, never got to see the judge. That is problematic.
I've seen them do this five other times. They want the bond, folks. They are swindling the bond. This is just a test of my new software. So we'll see.
@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻
Why are all Leftwing corporations swindlers? 👇🧐 https://t.co/tWEv9HlhSp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Whole Foods, known for its organic and locally grown products, has been found to import a significant portion of its organics from China. The USDA does not inspect imported foods but certifies private inspectors to do so. Whole Foods uses Quality Assurance International (QAI) as its certifying company, but QAI has not certified any products in China. Concerns about the quality of food from China are growing, as the FDA has already stopped 260 shipments this year due to issues like pesticides, bacteria, and filth. The small type used to indicate "product of China" on packaging is seen as intentional.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 75 stores. Whole Foods is the undisputed leader in organic foods and promotes locally grown. But the IT team has found that much of Whole Foods organics are imported from China.
Speaker 1: Honestly, I would have never flipped it over to see that it was a product of China.
Speaker 0: But the USDA doesn't inspect imported foods. It certifies private inspectors to do the job. Whole Foods employs a company called Quality Assurance International. But the company confirms QAI has not certified any products in China. There's growing concern about the quality of food from China.
Already this year, the Food and Drug Administration, which checks for food safety, stopped 260 shipments of foods like strawberries emanated with bad pesticides, bacteria, or filth. I think it's probably not an accident that product of China is in such small type.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was falsely arrested twice and witnessed others facing the same injustice. They even seized a $3.5 million home and gave it to the Westchester County DA. Additionally, they stole a $30 million home and sold stolen sniper rifles to Libya. Case number: 22cv01065JAM.
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
They falsely arrested me twice and they Nollie all rapists. they falsely arrested home owners with no mortgage and fake liens. They foreclosed and gave the $3.5 million dollar home to the Westchester County DA. They stole a $30 million dollar home of the CheyTEC Corporation. They stole fully automatic guns and sold 40 million in stolen sniper rifles to Libya. 22cv01065JAM
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
80K people to have convictions cleared in Connecticut over the next month https://www.wtnh.com/news/connecticut/hartford/80k-people-to-have-convictions-cleared-in-connecticut-over-the-next-month/ Clemente Guisto has raped 4 women. The last one is 16. Raped on metro north, no arrest.
80K people to have convictions cleared in Connecticut over the next month
More than 80,000 people in Connecticut will have certain low-level convictions cleared from their criminal records over the next month, according to Gov. Ned Lamont (D-Conn.)
wtnh.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Sniper rifle receipts from a criminal enterprise in CT raise questions about the US attorney and state's attorney defending them, and the lack of action from the State police. Also, concerns about theft by the ATF and Ron Chorches. #JusticeNeeded
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
Sniper rifles receipts from A State created Criminal enterprise in CT. Why does the US attorney defend them? Why does the state's Attorney defend them and Why doesn't the State police take a complaint? Flynn2024 22cv01065 https://t.co/eX3WwMEJ1j
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker in the video presents evidence of a $40 million sale of stolen weapons to the Libyan army, facilitated through various countries and the CIA. They highlight the judge's refusal to hold hearings and their belief that attorneys have been murdered or threatened. The speaker also criticizes the involvement of various government officials and accuses them of defending the wrong people instead of protecting the rights of Connecticut citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Connecticut. I'm gonna start showing evidence to Connecticut and this and the country that the judge will not allow us to enter into a federal court case. So what's happening is I'm a pro se litigator, they have a bias. I've been in my 350th case, and we've never gotten discovery, which is alarming since the cases I've dealt with in the past have to do with murder for hire, human trafficking, murder. So if you look to my right here, this is a ChiTech receipt or it's a requisition form for an order.
And if you look at the facts here, they are ordering item number 1 is 300 ChiTech 408M200 Intervention Rifles, okay? And here's 300 more. So that's G600. And here's 175 more. And here's 175 more.
Are different rifles, m 3 hundreds. Okay? 375 m 3 hundreds. It's a specific type of sniper used in the Mark Wahlberg movie Shooter. Okay?
And here's a 150 more rifles, three three eight purses Laupa Mag. Okay? So this is a $30,000,000 order here at the top part. Then they order 650,408 anti tank armor piercing bullets. And here, they order 400,375 cartridges.
So what we're saying is this is a $40,000,000 sale from a bankruptcy court in Connecticut related to 7 never heard, hearings that were ordered but never took place. And this is a Mark Stern. If you look at the top here, this is a Mark Stern email, governor Molloy's attorney. So what happened here is if you look, macchitech.com, that's a Connecticut corporation incorporated here, but it doesn't exist. The Real Chitech Corporation is a Greenwich company that manufactured and had multiple ATF licenses as a defense contractor.
No no one here has anything to do with it. But these items are stolen. Okay? Stolen items for, guess who? The Libyan army sold to Libya through India, through Morocco, through the CIA.
And if you look at all the problematic things I'm trying to get to the bottom of, the judge refuses a hearing. We requested yesterday, which would be 12/22/23, our 6th grand jury, which is surely to be denied by judge Meyer, who dealt who rolled in previous cases dealing with the Libyan Army project. So he seems to think I Jimmy conspiracy theorist, the district attorney is making false statements to the judge. On 12/18, the district attorney said that I was a domestic terrorist and that I wanted to blow up the Bridgeport Court, which is false. And the judge would not allow me to speak, and my attorney didn't show.
So what's happening here is at least 4 3 attorneys have been murdered, I believe, or one may have died just of pancreatic cancer. But the owner of this company was intentionally put in a coma, I believe. And the judge refuses to rule on the grand juries we're requesting, which we have every right to to get to the bottom of this information considering that it's the state of Connecticut secretary of state in charge of voter fraud, also in charge of fictitious rifle companies it's bank fraud. It's money laundering. Identity theft.
There are no licenses for this, transaction. These are sniper rifles, semiautomatics, project folks, our enemy. So I just want to make that perfectly clear that in Connecticut, the worst the head of the snake. We have problems, folks. And in this lawsuit are being threatened to change their testimony.
If you don't change your testimony, you will be shot in the back of the head like Charles. We have problems here that are insurmountable. And if we don't get some protection by the feds or the attorney general, the U. S. Attorney, they're all involved in defending these G's people instead of protecting the rights of the Connecticut citizens.
We have a problem with the US attorney, the district attorney, the prosecuting attorneys, the state's attorney, and the lawyers for the state's attorney, the lawyer for Blumenthal, the lawyer for Murphy, the lawyer for Menendez, Jew has his 2nd bribery indictment underway. Now they all have the same lobbyist as Hunter Biden, so I would be worried if I were you. Have a great
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
How much did the ATF steal? How much did Ron Chorches steal?
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
It has been difficult since 9/30/2000; I was the first whistleblower VS bernie madoff. The CT hedge funds run the Country and half the world. CT's Department of banking is a criminal enterprise INTENTIONALLY run by a complete moron.
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple posts discuss alleged corruption and criminal activities involving various individuals and departments in Connecticut. The author claims that their bank accounts were looted and accuses judges, police departments, and the state government of being involved. They mention money laundering, hiring hitmen, and the sale of stolen weapons. The author also mentions hacking incidents and being threatened by the police. They refer to Connecticut as "Corrupticut" and urge others to share their message.
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
5G apocalypse. Not on my watch. We need donations but 14 of my bank accounts in Darien and Norwalk CT were looted since 9/30/2000. By Kelly Drye and Warren, Judge Povodator, Judge heller, Judge Jacobs and the Stamford Police department, Norwalk police department, and the CT state Police with the help of Bernie Madoff and the state Banking and securities Commission. 1,239 cashed stolen checks for Judge Adams. 15 Detectives Stole it. Fst cv 14 502 496-s Money laundering by Malloy on http://jud.ct.gov 7-day trial. The Judges are corrupt. They hired a hit man. The Chief states Attorney is a king pin criminal. The hire Confidential informants to kill people. fstcv 10 5013544-s Fst cv 11 5013600-s. Read the transcript from State Vs riddle in CT. They spring cop killers to kill good Cops, a bad cop paid Filippelli to kill a cop named lamb. A bad cop paid Filipelli to kill a good cop named Deely. Filipelli worked for Larrabee, who worked for Povodator and Malloy. testified get gets paid to hurt people and the state's Attorney sprang him to do it. This does not compare to the evidence we have now. Mark Stern sold stolen fully automatic rifles and sniper rifles to the Libyan Armey. 22cv01065 read version 27. Who stole the evidence? O Donovan Murphy. Who is protecting him? Judge Bozzuto. Officeof.thechiefcourtadministrator@jud.ct.gov CT hacked 20 other States in 2020. Whoever destroyed the CVR? and the memory cards? I would like to thank them. They are all caught. Share this everywhere for me. I was threatened again by Norwalk police last night. Wait for it. Corrupticut is the head of the snake. Fear no evil.
Connecticut Judicial Branch
jud.ct.gov
@Flynn2022 - 2024 John Flynn US Senate Candidate For CT
CT State Trooper Captain Kevin Manzolillo had me arrested for being a sovereign citizen? https://t.co/rIUzBQZPwP
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a message for Captain Kevin Manzuelo. John Glenn urgently needs a callback regarding two false arrests by Mark Stern. He is on his way to Bridgeport and can pick up the information. John Glenn is running for US Senate and wants to know what a sovereign citizen is. He was falsely arrested twice and his camera, which contains evidence on various cases including the Gilgo case and sniper rifles, was stolen. There is a big problem in Norwalk involving fraud, embezzlement, contaminated lots, and building on contaminated lots. Many people, including Murphy, will go to jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is I'll record your message at the tone. When you're finished, hang up or stay on the line for further options. This is a message for captain Kevin Manzuelo. I'm told this is his number. 860-456-5853.
Need a callback immediately. It's about the 2 false arrests by Mark Stern, who worked for Malloy, that were sold to Libya. And I want the On my way to Bridgeport. Thanks. I can stop by and pick it up.
Have a great day. Oh, I'm John Glenn, I need a callback. 203-561-0840. You're a captain in the troop g barracks. I'm holding a document in my hand and that has your name on it.
Let me read you from it. Larry Please tell me what a sovereign citizen is because I wanna know. I am running for US Senate. I was falsely arrested twice, and you are handling it. My camera was stolen.
It contains Gilgo case evidence. It contains Pictures of the sniper rifles I was referring to. It contains all types of evidence on many different cases that I am currently working on, and I need a What's up? What's up? What's going on today?
I'm busy. It's good. We're Rick Rick freaking nailed. This is we're closing the Rick has totally Uncover the hugest problem in Norwalk history, and they're all gonna go to jail. Murphy.
Everybody. Every everybody. Every single one of them. What happened? It deals with Oyster Shell Park, Veterans Park, fraud, embezzlement, contaminated lots, Building on contaminated lots of legalese.
Every everything you can think of, it's it's a
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Whistleblower CATCHES Fulton County DA Fani Willis ON-TAPE stealing grant money, then launching coverup plot— THIS is who is prosecuting TRUMP?! https://t.co/5xqfIJFrMt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lover boy finalizes divorce to be with Fannie, but they face subpoenas regarding their actions together. Fanny's office has a whistleblower, Amanda Timpson, who recorded Fanny's aide, Michael Kufi, allegedly misusing federal grant money. The whistleblower confronted Fanny about it. Fanny fired the whistleblower, claiming she didn't meet her standards. It seems that Fanny's office has a pattern of using public money for personal expenses, such as trips and swag. It's worth noting that Fanny is involved in prosecuting Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got an update in the lover boy, Fannie Willow saga. Lover boy finalizes divorce so he could run away with Fannie, but then Fanny and Lover Boy got hit with subpoenas and have to testify about their shenanigans together. And when it rains it pours. Fanny's office has a whistleblower, and the whistleblower recorded Fanny. And the free beacon gave the recording the prime time.
The whistleblower, Amanda Timpson, says she caught Fanny's aide stealing money. Fanny's office got a federal grant for half a $1,000,000. It was supposed to go to gang prevention. But Fanny's aide, Michael Kufi, allegedly blew the money on travel, computers, and swag. The whistleblower confronted Fanny and recorded it.
Speaker 1: He wanted to do things with grants that were Impossible. And I kept telling him, like, we can't do that and questioning stuff. He would take me off projects, tell people I wasn't doing what I was supposed to because I Questioned him because I understood. I helped to write that grant. I knew what was in that grant.
He told everybody, we're gonna get Macbooks, we're gonna do that. We're gonna get swag. We're gonna use it for travel. I said you cannot do that. It's a very, very specific grant.
So I respect that as your assessment. It was clear to me that you and Succapi were not getting along. And I'm not saying that your assessment is wrong.
Speaker 0: So what'd Fanny do next? Fired the whistleblower. 7 armed men escorted her out of the office. Fannie said the whistleblower didn't meet her standards and Fannie's aide denies he stole swag. But do we sense a pattern here?
Fannie's office takes public money, hires unqualified people, and the money gets spent on trips and swag. This is the woman who's prosecuting Trump.
@SamuelLusk91 - Sam Lusk Lindsay
@rebelprazz @SirMichaelK1952 "They own most of the judges" and "These people are all protected by the Rothchilds" - Dr . Lorraine Day https://t.co/Q7BXbbdloo
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are conspiracy theories about Trump, Epstein, and the Rothschilds. Trump is seen as a potential threat due to his knowledge, but he may be controlled by powerful forces. The conversation also touches on Bill Barr, Epstein's connections, and the influence of the Rothschilds and Jewish judges. The speakers express doubts about Trump's ability to release information or make a significant impact. The overall tone suggests a belief in deep-rooted corruption and manipulation at the highest levels of power.
Translation: The speakers discuss various conspiracy theories involving Trump, Epstein, and powerful figures like the Rothschilds and Jewish judges. There are doubts about Trump's ability to reveal information or challenge the existing power structures. The conversation highlights suspicions of corruption and manipulation among the elite.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would be too much commotion if they actually just shot him like they did Kennedy. But if they could get him so discredited, then he's isolated in prison, and then guess what? Guess what? He's so depressed that he commits suicide, and then they don't have to worry about him telling them.
Speaker 1: Well, you know how I know Trump's not a good guy. Jeffrey Epstein, his his running mate, Ghislaine Maxwell's dad was Robert Maxwell who's the biggest Israeli Mossad spy there ever was. And Trump could've released. Yeah. No.
They threw him off his boat. But I'm saying that Trump could've released Trump knows what Epstein and then with Bill Gates going to the island. And now Trump is at the biggest vaccine salesman that I've ever seen, doctor Day. He might as well get a job at Pfizer or Moderna when he's out of the office in in a week.
Speaker 0: Well, again, he's gotta do what they tell him or they they really will kill him. So he still takes his orders from the Rothschilds. So when he said he was gonna drain the swamp, you know, he had Bill Barr for attorney general. Bill Barr is a Jew. Bill Barr's father was the head of the Tony High School, private high school in New York.
Guess who he hired? You know who he hired.
Speaker 1: Epstein's dad. I mean, yeah, he hired yeah. Epstein. His dad hired Epstein. Yeah.
Excuse me. His dad hired Epstein. Yes.
Speaker 0: So they're all in it together. But it seems that that that Trump has some redeeming qualities, and he is not as filthy as the rest of them. I'm not suggesting that he's squeaky clean by any means. No. But he's not as filthy as the rest of them, and they're afraid he might tell.
So they want to get rid of him, discredit him, and maybe even isolate him so they can kill him.
Speaker 1: Doctor Dave, do you think there's a possibility that he could actually release some sort of information or is there's no way because he's owned, bought, and sold? I mean, it was there do you think there's a possible
Speaker 0: I again, even if you released information, when they got all the bad stuff on the Supreme Court people, including the chief justices of the Supreme Court. They owe most of the judges so that nobody you know, Hillary Clinton, they say, oh, oh, well, they got enough to to arrest her. Now they're never gonna arrest Hillary Clinton. These people are all protected by the Rothschilds and all these Jewish judges that they've got all over. That's why they waited till this time.
They've had many, epidemics in the past. These have all been dry runs.
@lakemonstercl1 - 🇺🇸Steve2A🇺🇸God🇺🇸Family🇺🇸Country🇺🇸
These judges and DAs are not installed because they’re smart, they’re there because they’re corrupt and they’re bought and paid for! What’s their job, well it’s to get Trump! https://t.co/J0TMAehr94
Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge questioned if $175 million would be available in cash, even if its value changed. The speaker found it absurd, as the money was in a secure account. The judge's lack of understanding was frustrating, leading to a disappointing experience in court. Later, the speaker attended a criminal hearing, which was also deemed disgraceful.
Translation: The judge's lack of understanding about cash and secure accounts led to a frustrating court experience for the speaker. The subsequent criminal hearing was also disappointing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understanding is that the judge in the case said, well, what happens if the 175,000,000 isn't there at the time it would be necessary to make that payment? And the Trump people said, oh, that would be in cash, sir. He said, but what if it's not worth the same amount of money? That would be in cash, sir. A 175,000,000 is a 175,000,000.
Please tell me that didn't happen. Did that happen in that courtroom? They're laughing. So I guess the answer is yes.
Speaker 1: Oh, you you have no idea. We had the money in a Charles Schwab money market account, and the judge legitimately said with a straight face with his little team, hey, I I don't think this is secure money because something could happen to the market and it could go below a 175,000,000. To tell you how hard it was for me to keep my face straight in that moment, Sean, you can't make it up. This case should have been in the commercial division. It had no business being in the civil division in front of a judge that today was trying to invalidate any bond and doesn't understand that cash is green.
And when cash is held by Charles Schwab, they can't go trade it, they can't move it around. It's not a stock market, but he didn't understand basics. It was one of those moments that I truly didn't feel I could have after 11 weeks in front of this judge, but it just can't stop. He can't stop surprising me. Right.
Speaker 0: By the way,
Speaker 1: it was a disgrace to be honest. And then after that, I went to the criminal hearing, which is another disgrace.
@KathleenWinche3 - Kathleen Winchell ❤️🤍💙🇺🇸🇺🇸
They líè about everything and it’s rigged against us! 🤬 https://t.co/Q7VhsbXiHn
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been fed lies and many things once labeled as conspiracy turned out to be true. I question everything now, feeling manipulated beyond comprehension. It's hard to believe anything unless it's tangible. Deceit is rampant, making it impossible for humans to grasp the extent of falsehoods.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lies that we've been fed Mhmm. And so many things that were labeled conspiracy that turned out not to be conspiracy. I mean, it's now to the point where I already question Mhmm. Everything. I think we've all been manipulated a lot more than any of us can even fathom.
We are already at the point where you cannot believe anything that you see unless it's right in front of you, and you can touch it. There's so much deceit in this world that I I don't think that any human could process how much of it is false.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated with the financial advisory firms using Schwab as their trading platform, claiming they’re engaging in financial fraud and protecting corrupt practices. It seems they have special privileges that regular clients don't, and I question what else they might be doing with our money. The recent technical issues at Schwab feel like a tactic to prevent people from selling underperforming stocks, which only adds to my concerns about their integrity and transparency.
@TrueNorth444 - True North
“Due to a technical issue…”… 🚩They are robbing you blind. The Financial Advisory Firms who use Schwab as their trading platform: @KKR_Co@FocusFinancial Seattle’s Merriman Wealth Management @CDRBuilds The masters of Financial Fraud 👆🏻who run cover for their corrupt “Directors of Compliance” who get special trade privileges which YOU don’t get access to! They use @CharlesSchwab as their trade platform to conduct financial fraud between CLINTON FOUNDATION HEDGE FUNDS AND OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN BUNDLER. If they pay off corrupt judges for a half million wire to protect their own - what else are they doing with YOUR money? (Should we explore their sex trafficking now?) 🚩Did you know they also pay off corrupt Prosecuting Attorneys and corrupt Judges in King County to REMOVE YOUR GUNS? How much does *that* cost? 😉
@TrueNorth444 - True North
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
They are really acting like this isn’t a blatant attempt to keep people from selling their shitty stocks. Absolutely criminal. https://t.co/3MvOc2GNxz
@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙
Ok digital soldiers, I didn’t know this, so I BET MILLIONS OF PEOPLE DON’T KNOW THIS SO SEND THIS FOR A RIDE TO EDUCATE EVERYONE💩🤬! Cali is one BIG MONEY LAUNDERING OPERATION AND THEY DON’T GIVE A 💩 ABOUT THEIR CITIZENS😡 https://t.co/W2gD6woHv6
Video Transcript AI Summary
A billionaire couple in California, the Resnicks, uses more water than all residents of Los Angeles combined. They own the Palm Wonderful Company, which includes brands like Fiji Water, Palm Pomegranates, and Wonderful Pistachios. In 1994, California's public water access was privatized, and the Resnicks acquired 60% of the state's fresh water resources, making them the largest owners of fresh water in California.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I tell you that they are always shaming us to cover up for a billionaire, I mean it. There is 1 billionaire couple in California that utilizes more water than every single resident of Los Angeles combined. Their name is the Resnick's, and they own the Palm Wonderful Company, which, owns Fiji Water, Palm Pomegranates, and Wonderful Pistachios. Also, huge Zionists. In 1994, the public water access in California was taken away from the state and divided up amongst a bunch of private contractors.
One of those private contractors was the Resnick's, and they purchased 60% of the state's fresh water resources. They own the majority of all the fresh water in the state of California.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!
@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84
Let's make this clear. Social security isn't going broke. It's been robbed. Our money is being stolen. Democrats (and rinos) are fully aware of it, which is why they're screaming like banshees at DOGE. People need to go to prison for this. So many people need to go. https://t.co/2kREAgepbv
Video Transcript AI Summary
I gave a statement because the same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHNV supporter applications. Are you aware that this happened at least 3,200 times, according to the DHS report?
I am also aware that the same phone number was used on at least 20 different supporter applications at least 3,300 times, also per the report. Do you agree with that number? And the same email address was used on at least 20 different supporter applications nearly 2,000 times.
When we find fraud, we cure it. And yet nearly 2,000 times, the same email address was used on 20 different supporter applications. Also, the same 184-word text response was used on more than 1,800 applications by nearly 190 different supporters, and more than 460 nonexistent ZIP codes were used on support applications for over 2,800 aliens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sir, so that's why I gave a statement. Do you agree that the same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHMV supporter applications?
Speaker 1: So first, let me start by saying
Speaker 0: So these are yes or no questions. So yes or no?
Speaker 1: I I just wanna make clear that that the role that USCIS plays is on the supporters.
Speaker 0: And I'm asking about supporter applications.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm sorry. Can you repeat that question then? I I heard it as a parole the parolee.
Speaker 0: No. The same social security number was used on at least 20 different CHNV supporter applications. That's the question
Speaker 1: I asked. Sorry.
Speaker 0: You're aware of that?
Speaker 1: So, yes, I am very aware of
Speaker 0: That happened at least 3,200 times.
Speaker 1: I don't have the exact number.
Speaker 0: That's according to DHS's report.
Speaker 1: Okay. I don't
Speaker 0: have it. Dispute DHS's report.
Speaker 1: No. I absolutely will not
Speaker 0: And also the same phone number was used on at least 20 different supporter applications at least 3,300 times. That's according to the report. You agree that that report's accurate?
Speaker 1: I don't have that report in front of me, but
Speaker 0: I'm reading
Speaker 1: from it. Yes. But I don't have it in front of me and I would prefer
Speaker 0: So you would dispute it?
Speaker 1: No. I'm not disputing what I'm
Speaker 0: So you would deflect and ram ramble around. You don't disagree with that number. You don't think I'm deliberately cherry picking number and just saying, oh, I'm just throwing this stuff out. I'm giving you the numbers from the report. Do you trust me on that?
Do you at least trust me that far?
Speaker 1: Yes. I
Speaker 0: I agree with that number. The same email address was used on at least 20 different supporter applications nearly 2,000 times. You agree with that?
Speaker 1: Sir, if if there is a situation where we have
Speaker 0: Okay. Here.
Speaker 1: Concerns of fraud and integrity
Speaker 0: Look.
Speaker 1: We take action I'm at CIS. And that is exactly what we have done with regard to CHNB. Where
Speaker 0: we Okay. So let's let's let's let's clarify here. So I'm laying foundation, and and you don't really wanna admit that this there's this much rampant fraud here. You're trying to tell me that when you find fraud, we cure it. And yet nearly 2,000 times yet, and the same email address used on 20 different supporter applications.
The same exact 184 word text response to a question on the supporter application was used on more than 1,800 such applications by nearly 190 different CHNV supporters. More than 460 nonexistent ZIP codes were used on support applications on behalf of more than 2,800 CHNV aliens. So you
@jnottah - Hatton, America is back
DOGE and the DOJ need to look into this immediately, this CORRUPT Judge Boseberg and his other half, have been making out like BANDITS 🤬 https://t.co/StyuUaFhMu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Liddy Madsen, the judge's wife, receives $50,000,000, with $5,000,000 being sent to an unspecified location. Public support pays $15,000,000 a year, enabling travel and honorarium speeches, a tactic learned from the judge.
They allegedly took paycheck loans of almost $1,300,000 and an employee retention credit of $801,000. The speaker questions why Liddy is sending $5,000,000 to this location and where the money is going. They also question PPP and ERC loans they allegedly weren't entitled to. Tesla protesters were paid, and the speaker speculates Liddy must have been paid a lot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The judge's wife, Liddy Madsen. For some reason, Liddy didn't take the judge's name, but she sure takes taxpayer money. 50,000,000, in fact, and 5,000,000 has been sent here. Yes. Here.
It's very interesting if you check it out. The public support, that's you, pays there 15,000,000 a year, and they can go traveling on that. And then when you travel, you get an honorarium speech. She learned that trick from the judge. They took paycheck loans that they didn't deserve.
Almost 1,300,000.0. On top of that, the employee retention credit, 801,000. And look at that, they inadvertently mislabeled it. What is she doing sending 5,000,000 over here? Where is that money really going to?
And PPP and ERC loans that they weren't entitled to? The Tesla protesters were paid. How much was she paid? She must have got paid a lotta.
@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat
Y'all wanna see how deep the corruption goes in California and how long it's been going on? This is how CA was destroyed. https://t.co/KElDLd9ooh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pat Brown's father, Edmund Joseph Brown, was known for running scams and gambling operations in San Francisco. With the help of businessman William Newsom the second, Pat Brown became governor of California for two terms. During his governorship, he awarded the Squaw Valley concession contract to William Newsom the third and his partner, John Pelosi. The deal was criticized for the state of California paying for everything and getting nothing. He lost. But eight years later, the former governor's Jesuit son, Jerry, reclaimed the governorship in 1974. For eighty years, these four families have ruled over the state of California politically. What is a republic?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pat Brown's father, Edmund Joseph Brown, was known for running scams and gambling operations in San Francisco. With the help of businessman William Newsom the second, Pat Brown became governor of California for two terms. During his governorship, he awarded the Squaw Valley concession contract to William Newsom the third and his partner, John Pelosi. The deal was criticized for the state of California paying for everything and getting nothing. William Newsom the third grew up with the governor's son, Jerry, who was training to be a Jesuit priest.
John Pelosi's son, Paul, married Nancy D'Alesandro, daughter of Thomas D'Alesandro Junior, who was known for smuggling heroin into The US with Lucky Luciano and the Baltimore Mafia. John Pelosi's son Ron married William Newsom's daughter, Barbara. Over ongoing disputes about the Squaw Valley concession, William Newsom senior threatened to hurt the governor politically just as governor Brown was running for a third term against Ronald Reagan. He lost. But eight years later, the former governor's Jesuit son, Jerry, reclaimed the governorship in 1974.
He appointed William Newsom the third to a place or county judgeship in 1975, and three years later to the state court of appeal. William Newsom was an attorney for oil magnate j Paul Getty, named in the 1966 Guinness Book of World Records as the world's richest private citizen. And while serving on the appellate bench in the nineteen eighties, he helped Getty's son, Gordon, secure a change in state trust law that allowed him to claim his share of a multi air trust. After Newsom retired from the bench, he became administrator of the Getty Trust and provided seed money for his son Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi's nephew, to start the Plump Jack business that led to a career in San Francisco politics. As mayor of San Francisco state of California.
Gavin Newsom was informally adopted by the Gettys after his parents divorced and recently succeeded family friend Jerry Brown to be the current governor of California. For eighty years, these four families have ruled over the state of California politically. And with the help of Kamala Harris, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Dianne Feinstein, California's uncontrollable state government spending has amounted to over $2,000,000,000,000 in debt and the highest tax rates in the country. The homelessness population is on the rise so much that a typhus outbreak has reached epidemic levels. Thousands of needles from illicit drugs litter the streets.
They have made California a sanctuary state. They have been steadily chiseling away at the second amendment. They have passed laws for mandatory vaccinations, and they continue to aggressively oppose our president on every front. On October '16, right before Donald Trump won the election, president Obama transferred full control of the Internet from the US government to an independent California nonprofit organization. In a cyber war scenario, the US government may not have control over the Internet.
Even if it secures military and government domains and IP addresses, the targets in cyber warfare are likely to be civilian, and the US government requires private sector infrastructure to operate. Since the Internet underpins our computer systems, electrical grids, communication systems, and other critical infrastructure, our entire civilian society could be at risk. Who controls California? Who controls the four families? What is a republic?
@MarcNixon24 - Marc Nixon
Holy SH💩T BREAKING 💥 CARNEY CAUGHT The man running Canada: Hand-picked Brookfield’s cash machines Still tied to their payouts Pretends his “blind trust” 99% of his decisions ESCAPE conflict rules Canada isn’t being governed It’s being LOOTED https://t.co/JD9exHUSK8
Video Transcript AI Summary
When prime minister Carney set up his blind trust, he knew exactly what went in it.
The holdings in these funds have not been disclosed to the public.
But the prime minister, he knows what's in them.
These are millions of dollars to our best estimation.
In New York, when the prime minister was there just last week, he met with a variety of investment managers, all who are implicated in funds that he holds.
That places them in a pretty precarious position of conflict.
It's highly likely that, Mark Carney's Liberal government has made or will make publicly policy decisions that will impact the success of the holdings in these funds, Canada's at risk of entering a massive conflict of interest scenario.
So mister Koniker, shouldn't the prime minister be absolutely required to disclose the assets that exist within these funds?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Five minutes. Go ahead, please.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Sir, I I sense your frustration. And in the interest of time, I'm I'm gonna ask you some quick questions if that's okay for some clarity. You've raised a lot here. When prime minister Carney set up his blind trust, he knew exactly what went in it.
Correct? And it's unlikely the assets that went into the blind trust in such a short period of time have changed significantly. Correct?
Speaker 0: Ethics Commissioner Von Finkenstein acknowledged that most trustees will not change, the holdings. So I I agree with that. They won't. And even if they did, they're gonna be investing in big businesses in Canada and you're gonna know they're investing in big business Canada. I mean we we have conglomerates of industry sectors that are dominated by big businesses, and you're going to be invested in them because that's what everyone invests in in Canada.
Speaker 1: I spent some time in the investment world before I put my name on a ballot. He co led efforts to raise billions of dollars of capital for these funds. Correct? Yes. Okay.
Now the holdings in these funds have not been disclosed to the public. Correct?
Speaker 0: That's right. Not all the details.
Speaker 1: That's remarkable. But but the prime minister, he knows what's in them. Right?
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Okay. So now let me just try and get a sense of this. This isn't some sort of middle class holdings. These aren't modest savings of somebody who is making their way through the world. These are millions of dollars to our best estimation.
Correct?
Speaker 0: Yes. According to the best estimate of including the value of the stock options.
Speaker 1: And would you say the prime minister is entitled to future carried interest payments based on the performance of those funds, correct?
Speaker 0: I wouldn't say the infamous phrase that he's entitled to is entitlements, but yes, he's he is entitled, to that and to the, value of the stock options when they eventually mature in 02/1933, 02/1934.
Speaker 1: It's a remarkable throwback. I appreciate that very much, sir. Let me ask this. In in New York, when the prime minister was there just last week, he met with a variety of investment managers, all who are implicated in funds that he holds. That places them in a in a pretty precarious position of conflict.
Correct?
Speaker 0: Yes. Now
Speaker 1: if it's highly likely that, Mark Carney's Liberal government has made or will make publicly policy decisions that will impact the success of the holdings in these funds, Canada's at risk of entering a massive conflict of interest scenario. Correct?
Speaker 0: Canada's policy making process, yes, because of the, central role of the of the prime minister who is the boss over all policy making processes in the end.
Speaker 1: So mister Koniker, shouldn't the prime minister be absolutely required to disclose the assets that exist within these funds?
Speaker 0: Yes. There should be full disclosure, but it doesn't it adds a bit of transparency, but it doesn't resolve the conflict of interest. Transparency is transparency, and removing a conflict of interest is removing a conflict of interest. The one does not do the other.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a devastating indictment that you've laid out here in terms of the the risk that the prime minister's in. Have you
@AprilSpark1890 - 🇺🇸 𝓐𝓟𝓡𝓘𝓛 𝓢𝓟𝓐𝓡𝓚𝓢 🇺🇸
🤬This is just wrong. There has got to be something these people can be charged with.🤬 https://t.co/UuzbbAvdP1
Video Transcript AI Summary
A heated exchange unfolds between Speaker 0, who identifies as part of a community protection group, and Speaker 1, who represents ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Speaker 0 confronts the ICE team as they arrive in the neighborhood, insisting on seeing a warrant and demanding identification. The dialogue centers on whether the agents have a warrant signed by a judge and whether they should reveal badge numbers or other identifying information.
Speaker 0 repeatedly presses for documentation: “Could you show me it, please?” and asks, “Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?” He questions the legitimacy of the officers’ presence, asking, “What’s your badge number, sir? Do you have a badge number? Can you identify yourself, please?” He emphasizes that “you’re coming into my city” and challenges why they would be in the area.
Speaker 1 responds briefly and evasively, asserting identity as ICE and insisting that Speaker 0 has no business being present: “I’m ICE. Immigration. Immigration. Immigration. Customs enforcement. Okay. That’s all I am.” He adds, “You don’t have business when we get out of here, sir,” and later, “We’re looking for somebody,” though Speaker 0 pushes to know the name of the person they are pursuing: “Do you know his name? Do you have his name or her their name? What is their name?”
Speaker 0 emphasizes community scrutiny and accountability, stating, “These are one of my neighbors, so I just wanna,” and challenges the officers’ transparency, asking for their identifications and accusing them of hiding their faces: “Why are you covering your face? Why don’t you take your mask down?” He taunts them with a threat to publish the encounter: “I’m gonna get this on the Internet. Your family is gonna be ashamed of you when they learn what you’re doing.”
As the exchange escalates, Speaker 1 asserts authority and tries to disengage: “You don’t have business when we get out of here,” and “Okay. That’s all I am.” The confrontation intensifies with Speaker 0 inviting an on-the-record discussion and challenging the officers to converse “down” with him instead of remaining in their vehicle. The dialogue culminates with a physical and verbal standoff as Speaker 0 steps back and the officers retreat, while Speaker 0 continues to voice distrust, calling the actions “Gestapo”-like and insisting that the officers come talk to him in the street rather than remaining behind a door or in a car.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning. Excuse me. Do you guys have a a warrant sign?
Speaker 1: To do. Get out of here.
Speaker 0: Could you show me it, please?
Speaker 1: Who are you? Get out of Why would I show you my warrant?
Speaker 0: I'm part of a community protection group.
Speaker 1: Maybe you can help me. Maybe you can help me. I got you.
Speaker 0: Alright. And maybe you can help me. Just you're coming into my community. I wanna make sure you're here for the right reasons.
Speaker 1: Help me because we're looking for somebody.
Speaker 0: Who are looking for?
Speaker 1: No. I'm looking for somebody. Do I have a warrant?
Speaker 0: Okay. Could I see your warrant? Is that signed by a judge?
Speaker 1: Why would I show you my warrant?
Speaker 0: Well, these are one of my these are one of my neighbors, so I just wanna Which make one?
Speaker 1: Do you know his name?
Speaker 0: Do you have his name or her their name? What is their name?
Speaker 1: Thank you, sir. Go ahead. I
Speaker 0: got it. What is the the do you have a warrant signed by a judge? Do you have a warrant signed by a judge?
Speaker 1: You want to send. I don't need
Speaker 0: You're coming into my my city. What's your badge number, sir? Do you have a badge number? Can you identify yourself, please? Don't open the door.
Look at these cowards. Ice. Do not open the door. You should be ashamed. Get out of my community.
How about that? Cowards, Can't even show your face. Come on down. Come talk to me. You're coming into my city?
Why don't you come down and talk to me? Do you guys have badge numbers that you could reveal? Can you identify yourself, please?
Speaker 1: I'm ICE. Immigration. Immigration. Immigration. Customs enforcement.
Okay. That's all I am.
Speaker 0: Okay. That's all I am. Okay. So where are you guys coming from?
Speaker 1: You don't have business when we get out of here, sir.
Speaker 0: You're coming into my city.
Speaker 1: I apologize.
Speaker 0: To arrest people like the Gestapo. You guys are like the Gestapo. These people didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 1: So why are you here?
Speaker 0: Why are you covering your face? Why are you covering your covering your face? Why don't you take your mask down?
Speaker 1: Show your face.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna get this on the Internet. Your family is gonna be ashamed of you when they learn what you're doing.
Speaker 1: Step away from my car, man.
Speaker 0: I'm moving back. They're moving back.
@BigFish3000 - Big Fish
Former Investigator comes forward. Minnesota has known about these fraudulent Day Cares for many years. A 20 member task force had all the evidence to arrest these scammers and they shut down the investigation. Politicians allowed their constituents to be robbed. Credit: @lizcollin
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes being advised to start attending planning meetings with a task force. Over the next several weeks and months, he attended upwards of three planning meetings with a task force of about 20 personnel from various law enforcement agencies, health and human services, the BCA, Saint Paul PD, Minneapolis PD, all revolving around fraudulent daycares.
They were setting up sham daycares, with fake bills, fake students, or enrollments of students who never came—essentially, fake daycares. Over the next several months, they executed several search warrants throughout South Minneapolis, Lake Street, and different areas at these daycares. Not one of the daycares he served warrants on had anyone present; they were never occupied. They were completely empty from his experience, with stacks of invoices and student records of people who surveillance showed never went there.
He notes that nobody ever came in and out of these daycares. The operation “worked out” for three to four months. He was assigned as a support person to assist with anything needing financial experience, working with HSI and immigration authorities to pull records and related tasks. Ultimately, he says the task force just kinda went away, and he is not sure whatever happened to it. He mentions the meetings of “you know, I…” but the transcription ends there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Skills and so forth like that. So I was advised to start attending the planning meetings they were having with this task force. So over the next several weeks, months, I attended upwards of three, I believe, planning meetings with this task force of about 20 personnel of various law enforcement agencies, the health and human services, BCA, Saint Paul PD, Minneapolis PD, and it was all revolving around fraudulent daycares. They were setting up sham daycares, fake bills, fake students, or just enrolling students that never came, which is all fake daycares. That's the easiest way to explain it.
And then over the next several months, we executed several search warrants throughout South Minneapolis, Lake Street, and different areas at these daycares. Never not one of the daycares I served warrants on, not one person was ever present. Just empty buildings, stacks of invoices and student records of people that our surveillance showed never went there. Nobody ever came in and out of these daycares. It was just completely empty from my experience.
Never was occupied daycare. And like I said, worked out for three, four months. I was assigned a case just as as a support person to assist with anything needing as far as financial experiences we have with HSI and our immigration authorities and ability to pull records and stuff like that. And ultimately, the task force just kinda went away. Not sure whatever happened to it.
I just, the meetings of you know, I