reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
In 1844 the patent commissioner of the US Patent and Trademark Office said everything we needed was invented and it was time to shut down the patent office. In this lost 1937 film Lowell Thomas presents an anti-dystopian view into the future wrapped in human ingenuity. https://t.co/XNiH4Sab4E
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the future opportunities in America and emphasizes that they are not limited to any specific location. He mentions that some people believe that progress has come to a halt and that there are no more opportunities. However, he reminds the audience of a similar pessimistic view expressed by the commissioner of patents in 1844, who believed that everything had already been invented. The speaker highlights the importance of American ingenuity and states that as long as there are problems to be solved and desires to be met, progress will continue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To what new horizons can we look now? Where are tomorrow's opportunities? What's ahead in America for you, for your children? It is not a difficult assignment to answer these questions. The frontiers of the future are not on any map.
They're in the minds of men and in the test tubes and laboratories of the great industries we have built up here in America. But now what's ahead of us. Many of us have had our doubts. There are those who say today that opportunities have ceased to exist. Things are finished.
We have everything and not enough. There can be no more progress. Almost 100 years ago in the old patent office in Washington, the commissioner of patents was just as pessimistic as anyone you have ever heard. The advancement of our arts from here to here taxes our credulity And seems to precede the arrival of that period when human improvements must end. In other words, in 18/44, the commissioner was about ready to shut up the patent office and go home, believing that everything had been invented.
That industrial progress in America had already come to an end. He didn't know that within 2 years, he would be signing a patent on a method of vulcanizing rubber from which there was destined to spring up hundreds of new industries and jobs by the 1,000 that were made possible through this one idea? Know, the pessimists of that day never dreamed of the marvels that would soon follow their predictions. They overlooked one all important fact that we should know so well? That is, as long as there is a problem to be solved or a desire to be met American ingenuity will not rest.
@simongerman600 - Simon Kuestenmacher
Animated map shows the rise and fall of Blockbuster Video stores in the US from 1986 to 2019. Fascinating to view. Source: https://buff.ly/31np1fI https://t.co/ivDVVxnZMT
@Rainmaker1973 - Massimo
A brilliant overview of Boston Dynamics robots by CNET [video: https://buff.ly/3aYjTWG]
Buffer: Social media management for everyone
Use Buffer to manage your social media so that you can create and share your content everywhere, consistently. Try our forever free plan or upgrade for more.
buffer.com
@MakingFranklins - SpicySecretHistory
Nothing new under the sun- Robots in use over 100 years ago
Video Transcript AI Summary
Robots have been around for a long time, even as far back as 1883. Pictures from 1887 show a man being pulled in a carriage by a robot. The famous boxer Jack Johnson even fought against a robot. In 1883, a robot was shown off on stage, revealing its inner workings. In 1893, a robot was used in the military. There were also steam-powered robots, like Frank Reed Jr.'s steam man and steam horse. These early robots were a marvel and may have even inspired ideas in Star Wars. So, the concept of robots is not new; they have been around for a while.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Check this out. Ever heard the expression, there's nothing new under the sun? There were robots in existence in 18/83. Look at these pictures. 18 87.
This man is getting his carriage pulled by a droid. See that? This is the famous Moorish boxer, Jack Johnson. Who was he fighting against? A droid?
A bot? Here, the robot is on the stage being shown off to the crowd. 18/83 is showing the insides of the bot, the droid. 18/93, he is a droid in the military. Frank Reed junior and his new steam man.
Look at that. Marvel of the Klondike. Metal man triumphs over an enormous grizzly. How about this one? Frank Reed junior and his new steam horse.
Look at that. How about this one? What do you think Star Wars got the ideas about George from? They were already here.
@Humanbydesign3 - Humanbydesign
1922 SILENT FILM DEMONSTRATION OF AN EARLY "WIRELESS"TELEPHONE DEVICE(tecnnicaly there are some wires) 👇👇👇#PiezoelectricTechnology https://t.co/UW7OWnthjY
Video Transcript AI Summary
EASE Wireless is a 1920 silent film showcasing women demonstrating a wireless telephone, which is actually a crystal radio receiver. Crystal receivers, patented in 1901, derive power from radio signals without an external power source. The US bureau of standards published instructions for building crystal radios after World War I, leading to their public adoption. These radios could receive clear signals over several miles. Radio technology advanced during both World Wars, with radio broadcasting becoming a tool for propaganda. Until the 1930s, phone systems used radio telephony, enabling long-distance calls and telephone service in rural areas. However, the introduction of coaxial cables and microwave transmissions during World War II replaced radio telephony. It's interesting how wars often coincide with the introduction of disruptive technologies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: EASE Wireless is a short 1920 silent film that shows to women demonstrating what they refer to as a wireless telephone. What they're using is a crystal radio receiver. The crystal diode was officially patented in 1901 by JC Boses, a device for detecting fields. Crystal receivers don't require an external power source. They only need to be grounded and then they derive all their power from the radio signal.
An umbrella x is both an antenna and a power supply. Shortly after World War one, the US bureau of standards released a publication with instructions for practically anyone to build their own crystal radio, part of a coordinated push for public adoption. These surly versions were limited in their capabilities but could generally receive a clear signal over several miles. World War one helped introduce and propel the advancement of radio technology as new equipment and capabilities were developed as part of the war effort. Radio broadcasting marked the beginning of modern propaganda.
The way that it was able to transform the world could be likened to the birth of the The reason they refer to these radios as telephones is because up until the 19 thirties, the phone systems operated with a process called radio telephony. This allows radio signals to be used like a phone. In those days, it was used to make long distance phone calls. It was also used to provide telephone service to rural areas where it was not practical to build traditional telephone lines. While it was World War one that helped usher in radio technology telephony, it was the 2nd world war that helped replace it by introducing coaxial cables and microwave transmissions.
Isn't it interesting how wars always coincide with the introduction of disruptive technologies? Almost like that's one of the true objectives.
@AGiannas - El Greco
Using Old TV Lens to melt a lock - Amazing From Out Of Context Pets https://t.co/vRz0x0njsM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Using a giant lens from an old TV, I aimed the solar death ray at a lock to test its power. The intense heat caused the metal to melt and ripple. The solar death ray concentrates sunlight onto a central hot spot, creating hellish temperatures. After leaving the lock in the light for a while, I disengaged the death ray. The main part of the lock turned into a liquid puddle of molten metal. I stretched the liquid metal with a wrench, leaving the steel shank intact. Once cooled, the lock had transformed into a melted glob of metal with the shank still attached.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a giant lens that I got from an old rear projection TV, and I want to take the Arizona sun to see if I could mow a lock. I placed it on the optimal hot spot under the lens and then aimed the solar death ray right at the lock. This is the directed energy beamed right onto the body of the lock, and you can see that under these extremely high temperatures, the metal began to rise, ripple, and actually melt. These hellish temperatures are sheath because the solar death ray gathers sunlight that hits it and moves it to a central focal point. The light is so efficiently bent that there's a shadow around the central hot spot.
I let the lock in the intense light for a while and disengaged the death ray. The main part of the lock was a liquid puddle of molten metal, and I took a wrench and actually stretched the liquid metal out across the brick. The steel shank of the lock remain intact because it has a much higher melting point. I allowed the liquid metal to cool down and then I took a closer look. What once had been the lock was a big glob of melted metal with the shank attached.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
My insight: the past informs the future. Generations have not been truly taught history. In this we all suffer. AI began at MIT in the 1950s. This 1961 film shows how the past intelligently discussed the future. Vital to watch this film for perspective. The entire film: https://t.co/3PRQuUG2wp
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the potential of machines to think and the advancements in computer technology. They explore the concept of programming and how it relates to human instinct and learning. The speakers also showcase examples of how computers can perform tasks such as playing checkers and writing plays. They discuss the future implications of machine thinking and the challenges and opportunities it presents. Overall, the video highlights the ongoing research and development in the field of artificial intelligence and its potential impact on society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, a preview of the future as it begins to take shape in the laboratories of the world. Produced by the CBS Television Network. In cooperation with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This program is brought to you by AMF, American Machine and Foundry Company.
Speaker 1: World. Good evening. I'm David Wayne. And as all of you are, I'm concerned with the world in which we're going to live world. Tomorrow, a world in which a new machine, the digital computer, may be of even greater importance than the atomic bomb.
Can machines really think? Even the scientists argue that one.
Speaker 2: I don't believe that we can say yet that machines do think. I have a basic question which I always ask, and that is, are these producing anything really new? Until I see a machine producing genuinely new Things. I will not agree that machines think.
Speaker 3: I confidently expect that within a matter of 10 or 15 years, Something will emerge from the laboratories, which is not too far from the robot of science fiction fame.
Speaker 4: Story.
Speaker 1: World. With me tonight is professor Jerome b Wiesner, director of the research laboratory of electronics at MIT. World. Doctor Wiesner, what really worries me today is what's gonna happen to us if machines can think, and what interests me specifically is can they? Well, that's a very hard question
Speaker 4: to answer. If you'd asked me that question just a few years ago, I'd have said it was very far fetched. And today, I just have to admit, I don't really know. I suspect if you come back in 4 or 5 years, I'll say sure. They really do think.
Well, if you're confused, doctor, how
Speaker 1: do you think I feel? World. Professor Weisner, I don't think I have to tell you that the conception of the robot, a thinking machine, has been Man's dream for centuries, also his nightmare. Of course, up until recently, the exploitation of that dream has world. Been largely in the hands of science fiction writers and my colleagues in the motion picture industry.
Do you remember a a great robot in, the silent film, world. Metropolis. No.
Speaker 4: I don't think I ever saw
Speaker 1: that one. I'd like you to see that. It'd be very nice. Okay, Charlie. Roll
Speaker 3: world.
Speaker 4: That movie, professor, is still way ahead of us. You know? Is he? He is. And, you know, if I'd seen that movie as a youngster.
I've probably been afraid of science. Doctor, when that film was made,
Speaker 1: and it wasn't too long ago, the thinking machine concept was Still in the realm of make believe. What do
Speaker 4: you think about it today? Well, the reason that's such a very hard question to answer is we know so very little about thought processes or about Information that makes up thought processes. You know, there are many things which machines can do today which, if they were done by human beings, you would certainly call thinking. Have Have you ever watched a child try to learn the alphabet? I've got a piece of film here that I'd like to have you see.
Speaker 5: World. Down, up, down, up. Do you know that letter? World. No.
It looks like an m, but it isn't. It's a w. An m will tie down, isn't it? I'm going to make an x there and you see If you can draw over the same lines that I make down, up, down, and up. Can you do that?
That's fine. What letter is it? W. That's right. Good.
Now you see Of
Speaker 4: course, she makes mistakes at first. The real question is, how does she ever learn to get them right?
Speaker 5: I can copy yours. That's That's right. You copy
Speaker 1: mine. Well, do you mean to tell me that you don't even know yet how a child learns the letters of the alphabet?
Speaker 4: Psychologists who study the problem have a lot of ideas about what goes on, but no real explanation. A letter is simply a pattern And we don't yet know how the brain recognizes patterns. Do you
Speaker 5: know what letter that is? F? No. It's a key.
Speaker 1: World. Well, do you think you'll ever understand these problems?
Speaker 4: I think so. That's one reason we're so interested in the computer and what Can be
Speaker 1: made to do. Are you suggesting that the computer can do what this child is doing? Yes. I am.
Speaker 4: The computer is a remarkable machine. Later on in the program, we're going to see it write an original TV western. But first, let's see how the youngster is doing here.
Speaker 5: What letter is it? L. World. P. Now can you tell me what this letter is?
Do you remember this one? It's a w.
Speaker 4: Now let's see if the computer has as much trouble with the alphabet.
Speaker 1: You mean we're going to see the computer do what the child is?
Speaker 4: I hope
Speaker 1: so. Now does that really prove that machines can learn?
Speaker 4: I'll tell you what it does. World. It compares the letter you write with the letter you first showed it. And as it gets more and more information about what is called a w, for example, it is more and more able better able to make a judgment about whether the letter that's being written on the screen is, in fact, a dummy or not. Let's see.
Speaker 6: Okay, Larry. Let's read in the program again.
Speaker 1: World. Well, at least I know what a program is. A program's the rules you want the computer to follow. World. Now what are they doing?
Showing the computer the alphabet for the first time?
Speaker 4: Yes. Just the same way the teacher did with a child. Incidentally, for convenience, you see, we're using p's and w's
Speaker 6: Okay. Now we have those characters in the machine. We'll try some, test with them.
Speaker 7: Call it a d. It's pretty poor, but on
Speaker 6: the other hand, it doesn't have much knowledge. Well, here's a p for Try another p. Should get it this time.
Speaker 1: Wow. Well now, that's luck. That's pure luck.
Speaker 4: No. As a matter of fact, one thing the computer can't do is fool the teacher. On the next try, look at the line below the letter. The longer the line, the sure the computer is of its answer.
Speaker 6: Good enough. That's A pretty good percentage as indicated by that bottom bar. 80%. Pretty good.
Speaker 4: Now do you call that learning?
Speaker 1: Well, I know that if my wife and I saw our kids going through that process, we'd call it learning. So machines really can learn.
Speaker 4: You know, we don't really know much about the thought processes, and this is why I'm so hesitant. But we are studying the problem that's being studied in a very many places and by people in many disciplines.
Speaker 1: You mean psychologists, psychiatrists, philosophers, and so on?
Speaker 4: Yes. And electrical engineers and mathematicians and others.
Speaker 1: Well, if the computer is this important, why haven't I heard more about it?
Speaker 4: Well, the computer is a relatively new thing, and we're just really getting an appreciation For the full range of its usefulness, many people think it's going to spark a revolution that will change the face of the earth almost as much as the First Industrial Revolution did.
Speaker 3: Well, Well,
Speaker 1: now this brings me back to my original question. Can machines think? I mean by that, world. Thinking, that process we try to avoid when we have a problem to solve.
Speaker 4: You mean like I'm trying to do in avoiding your question? World. Do you remember that puzzle about the cannibals and the missionaries?
Speaker 1: I do remember that. That's when we tried to cross the river with the missionaries and the cannibals without is getting eaten.
Speaker 4: Yes. That's the one. Well, out at Carnegie Tech, professors Simon and Newell are doing some very interesting work trying to understand that kind of logical No problem. Let me show you. Problem.
This is professor h a Simon.
Speaker 8: Three missionaries world. And 3 cannibals are trying to cross a broad river so that they can reach a town on the other side. They have a rowboat, the Cannibals. They have a rowboat, which will, however, hold only 2 at a time. All of them know how to row.
There's one difficulty. No group of missionaries and cannibals may be on either side of the river at any time if the cannibals in the group outnumber the missionaries world. Now the problem is to plan a series of trips that will get all 3 missionaries And all 3 cannibals across the river in the boat without anyone being eaten. Do you have any questions now, Robert? World.
Well, you may start now. Please remember to say aloud as much as you can about what you're thinking, and you may move the missionaries and cannibals to try different combinations of them. World.
Speaker 9: There's only 1 boat.
Speaker 8: There's just 1 boat, and only 2 can sit in it at a time. World. Why don't you take them across and see how it would work? Remembering that the boat always has to come back with someone to get the next load.
Speaker 9: Then I have the missionary bring the boat back. Take one of the missionaries.
Speaker 8: Careful. That man is going to get eaten.
Speaker 9: World. Is it possible for any of them to swim?
Speaker 8: No. I'm afraid they are non swimmers.
Speaker 9: Well, I'll bring 1 of the missionaries over by himself.
Speaker 1: Poor Barbara. You know, I sympathize with her. I remember how baffled I was the first time I tried that problem.
Speaker 4: World. Barbara's bright, and she'll get it after a bit. As a matter of fact, in a moment, I'll show you her solution.
Speaker 9: 1 take 1 That's
Speaker 4: why professor Simon asks her to talk aloud as she works. You'll have a record of what she says.
Speaker 9: And then I'll bring the other one over, and that's it.
Speaker 8: Very good. That's the correct solution. World. And now we'll go and try the same thing out with the computer on the coast.
Speaker 1: World. Oh, no. Now don't tell me you're going to try to get that computer to do the same thing. World. Has it found a solution already?
Speaker 4: Yeah. And in just a second, we'll have a chance to look at the answer.
Speaker 1: World. Is that the answer
Speaker 4: you have there? Yes. As a matter of fact, it's both answers. We've typed out Barbara's solution on computer paper too. Can you tell which is which?
Speaker 1: Do I have to answer that? How does the machine do it, doctor?
Speaker 4: Well, professor Simon thinks that logical process are really quite simple And only a peer complex because there are so many of them in cascade.
Speaker 1: Well, does that mean that the machine tries every possible answer?
Speaker 4: No. It does just what a person does. It tries those things which seem most likely.
Speaker 1: Well, how does the machine know what's likely?
Speaker 4: Well, a Person knows what's likely on a basis of experience. The machine knows what's most likely on a basis of probabilities or reasonableness that has been programmed into it, that is told to it in advance.
Speaker 1: Well, what else can computers do?
Speaker 4: Well, many things. Though, as I've already Said we're just really beginning to understand the capabilities of the computers. I've got some film to illustrate this point which I think will amaze you. World. That
Speaker 1: man isn't playing checkers against a computer, is he?
Speaker 4: Sure. And it plays pretty well. Now which color is the machine playing? Black. The player pushes those switches to tell the machine his moves.
Incidentally, he has to make the machine's moves on the checkerboard as well. Well, then how does he determine the machine's moves? By watching those lights on the console. Machine also prints out its moves. Who's that watching?
He's doctor a l Samuel, an MIT graduate now with IBM. World. Doctor Samuel programmed the computer to play checkers so he could study machine learning. World. Let's see what it's printing out now.
How in the world did
Speaker 1: it do that? Doctor Wiesner, how does a computer work?
Speaker 4: Well, it would take too long to give you a detailed explanation, but I think I can give you a simple explanation of the principles if
Speaker 0: you want. Make a little box
Speaker 4: that you can put signals into, and every time you put a pulse into it, it adds. And and, With these devices, you can make adders, you can make multipliers, you can make devices which do a number of other mathematical operations. Now with these various building blocks, and it takes just a very few of them, you can organize much more complicated mathematical problems, and what you do is what we call programming. You lay out a series of steps, and you have to tell a machine Every blessed single step you wanted to do because it can't do anything unless you do this, and this we call a program, we feed it into the machine and it carries out the operations We've told it to do 1 at a time. Of course, there is a saving grace here, which is very important.
Once the machine has learned how to do something, it can print out into its, Permanent memory, the tape or on a piece of paper of the kind we've seen, the instructions for doing this, and you never have to think about that particular thing again.
Speaker 1: Well, does the nervous system work like a computer?
Speaker 4: No. Not really. Though there are many similarities between computers and living nervous systems, But neurophysiologists who work on the problem think there are many more differences than there are similarities. Fact the matter is though, that, both systems use electrical signals. There's electrical potentials and pulses.
Well, then by following the complicated steps that a computer takes, the world. Steps and stages in solving a problem. Can you learn
Speaker 1: how, or more about how the nervous system works?
Speaker 4: But what you can learn There's a good deal about thought processes or at least simulated thought processes by this method, but it's very dangerous to carry this analogy too far. Well, if I
Speaker 1: told you all about my particular problem, could you solve that on a computer?
Speaker 4: Well, it'd probably take a psychiatrist. My problem.
Speaker 1: I think I better ask my question over again. You have to tell a computer what to do. In other words, all of the computers that we've seen, have been programmed, world. That is have been told by men what to do. Yes.
Speaker 4: But, you know, that's really not a valid argument because there's every evidence that and are programmed too. That is they have certain built in programming. Now wait
Speaker 1: a minute, doctor Wiesner. Are you suggesting That men are born with something put in their brains like, men put information into a computer.
Speaker 4: Yes. They're not only born this way, but they get programming in other ways. That is, there are really 2 ways in which you can get programming. There is a hereditary part, that is the part you're born with. You can also get information or programming in your brain by experience, that is by learning.
Speaker 1: Well, surely in higher animals, learning is more important.
Speaker 4: We like to think that anyway.
Speaker 1: Can you give me an example of programming in something that's alive?
Speaker 4: Yes, I can. I've got something over here. Can you tell me what this silhouette's supposed to represent?
Speaker 1: Well, it doesn't, remind me of anything in particular.
Speaker 4: If I hold it up here like this, does it look like a goose to you? Yes. It does. Now if I turn it around, what's it make you think of?
Speaker 1: Well, if we're still thinking about birds, I'd say it was a hawk.
Speaker 4: Pretty well. Let's see if a duck can do as well. The ducklings used in this experiment have been raised in isolation. I've never seen any other birds.
Speaker 1: And there I see is our friend, the goose. World. Well, there wasn't any reaction
Speaker 4: at all, was there? No. There wasn't. That's what interested professor Melzack. You're seeing what happened when he first did this experiment in the London Zoo.
World. If you were a duck, would you worry if you saw a goose?
Speaker 1: You mean he will worry when professor Melzack That changes that goose into a hawk.
Speaker 4: Well, let's watch.
Speaker 1: Well, that's a really frightened duck.
Speaker 4: Well, not all ducks react this way. Some are simply wary when they see their first hawk. World. Well, mister Wayne,
Speaker 1: well, what I gather from this is that this duck that never had been exposed in its world. Any other kind of a bird can now suddenly differentiate between a goose and a hawk. Now you call that some kind of programming. To me, that's what I would call instinct.
Speaker 4: Well, I'd agree with you. Instinct It's the word you use, I'm using programming or at least that part of programming which is determined by heredity. You see animals seem to Start life with a large part of their no nervous system knowing what to do. That's the reason why we breathe and why our heart beats and why babies, world. Know how to cry or when to cry when they need help.
Well,
Speaker 1: do you mean that instinct turns out to be some kind of programming that we're born with?
Speaker 4: Yes. That's using our language. Let me show you some very interesting research that was done on the frog last year at MIT by professors Letvin in Maturano, which seems to indicate that some animals at least are born with very much more built in information than we used to suspect was the case. Well, does it show that we're born with, programming? But what it does show is that in the frog, at least, the Frog's eye reports only very specific information to the brain.
Speaker 1: You mean that the optic nerve of the frog doesn't report Everything it sees?
Speaker 4: No. It reports only very specific things. Things which seem to be very important for the survival of the frog. Let's take a look at the next film.
Speaker 1: Well, now the frog doesn't pay any attention to those dead flies. Isn't he hungry?
Speaker 4: Sure. But his eyes don't see them. He's hungry. Alright. Watch.
Speaker 1: Well, if he didn't eat any of the dead flies, why did he eat the fly on the string?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, that's what professor Lettvin's trying to find out. It seems that the frog only sees things that move. Here, Lettvin's looking through the microscope into the frog's brain, Preparing to put a tiny electrode into one of the fibers in the frog's optic nerve.
Speaker 1: You mean when world. Fiber sees something, it'll send a signal through the electrode that we can see.
Speaker 4: Yes. And you'll hear it too. Now professor Letvin is putting a target, semicircular hemisphere in front of the frog's eye. And then using a magnet on the back of the target, he can move a small metal disk around the target Until he find the point at which the particular fiber is looking. World.
There he's found it. See it sends an electrical signal through the electrode.
Speaker 1: But what's the professor doing now? Well, he's
Speaker 4: trying to find out just what kind of things make this particular fiber react.
Speaker 1: World. It looks to me as though this fiber reacts every time something moves. It does. Well, that could explain Why the frog didn't eat the dead flies? They didn't move, so he couldn't see them.
Speaker 4: Oh, that's professor Lettvin's suggestion anyway. He said to world. So suppose the fibers in a frog's eye look only for specific kinds of things in the world around them. Now as we've seen, One kind of fiber apparently only reports movement. And here, professor Lettvin is looking for a different kind.
World. You see this fiber reports to the brain when anything small enough to eat moves into view, and it keeps reporting as long as the object remains there.
Speaker 1: World. Well, why did it stop reporting when the light went out and world. Then failed to report when
Speaker 4: it came back on. Well, think of the light going off as a shadow passing overhead, an owl's sake. And apparently, in a dangerous situation, The frog's eye only reports the danger, not food. Watch now as a long bar has passed through the field of vision. The bar is too straight and Too big to be a bug so you see there is no reaction.
Professor Letvin's work suggest that the fibers from the frog's eye only report specific big things to the brain, things related to the frog's survival. One group of fibers looks only for sharp edges. Another group, this one, seems to be a bug detector.
Speaker 1: Well, now I was always under the impression that the eye reported all light patterns.
Speaker 4: And so were we all. I ought to add, though, that professor Letvin's theories are not yet accepted by all people in the scientific community, or at least insofar as the implications about human vision are concerned. World.
Speaker 1: Well, if professor Letman's theories are correct, we would have some explanation for instinct, wouldn't we?
Speaker 4: Well, the existence of building coding or instinct was never really in doubt. Oh, this is a very interesting demonstration of it. It's a demonstration of least of one kind of instinct because it's obvious that the frog world. Didn't learn to, recognize flies, but was born with this ability already in its brain.
Speaker 1: Well, now if I may say so, people aren't frogs, are they?
Speaker 4: Well, no one really suggests that people are precoded to the same extent that frogs are, but it's very clear that people also are born with certain amount of information built into their nervous system. Let me show you something that'll prove this point. We're going to Geneva to the laboratories of professor Jean Piaget and his associates.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 4: doctor Barbel Inhilter working with a youngster of 5. By the way, how's your French, mister Wayne? Well, it's
Speaker 1: not very good. I'm sorry to say.
Speaker 4: Well, doctor Inhelder here is filling 1 glass with milk, then she's asking the child to fill his with exactly the same
Speaker 5: world.
Speaker 4: Voices, you go a little too much. World. Is it now the
Speaker 1: same pipe? He's a real stickler, isn't he?
Speaker 5: Voila.
Speaker 1: World.
Speaker 4: I would prefer to drink my milk in the tall glass. I've poured it all in the tall glass. You and I, Have we still the same amount? No. Who has more?
Speaker 3: But how
Speaker 4: do you know? Because it is taller.
Speaker 1: World. That's delightful, isn't it? Now how could that child make that mistake?
Speaker 4: Well, apparently, when we're born, we rely exclusively on our eyes to form our concepts of the world around us. He apparently had certain preconceived notions of the world around him, and some of these are wrong. And as he grows up, he's going to have to learn to correct them.
Speaker 1: World. Well, then our eye apparently is programmed to tell us that that which is taller holds more.
Speaker 4: Yes. And in nature, isn't that generally the case?
Speaker 1: Well, I've always been under the impression that seeing is believing.
Speaker 4: Well, actually, it's just the opposite. These experiments indicate that we tend to see only those attributes of objects Which our nervous system is designed and programmed to see. Then seeing isn't believing, but believing is seeing? Well, it works both ways, But certainly believing is seeing. Watch this next piece of film.
Speaker 1: World. Professor Weisner, I've seen this Before. Now that window isn't square. You see one side is longer than the other.
Speaker 4: Yes. But no matter how many times you've seen it, I'll bet you still can't see through the illusion. What's the window doing now?
Speaker 1: It's revolving. I know who it's revolving.
Speaker 4: Of course, it is. But I'm certain that you don't see it that way. You see it as though we're oscillating back world.
Speaker 1: Well, as a matter of fact, you're right.
Speaker 4: You see your eyes tell you that anything that is longer is closer to you and your experience tends to confirm this. So you have to see the long side of the window as though it were in front even when it's in back. You just can't see it revolve. Now let's cover the window with a cloth. The cloth sides are equal in length.
Now maybe your brain will let you see the window rotate. Look at the bottom Corner of the core. Now do you see it revolve?
Speaker 1: Yes, I do.
Speaker 4: Now let's put a tube through the window. What do you see this time? You know why? That's because you've assumed the tube is made of rubber. Now if you tell yourself that it's made of steel, you'll see it cut through the window instead of bending.
Am I right?
Speaker 1: Well, now I have to think real hard that it's steel. Right? Right. It's steel. It's steel.
World. It's well, I'll be. Yes. You are right.
Speaker 4: World. Now then, doesn't that prove that you tend to see what you believe?
Speaker 1: You mean, professor, that I am Somewhat programmed. In other words, that there are rules built into me that make me react sometimes similarly To a machine. Yes. And you and everyone else. Well, I I think I'm beginning to get your point.
I am born with certain rules built into me, But I think I can think. That is, I say I can think. Therefore, I shouldn't be too upset when a machine thinks just because it has rules built into it by man. That's logical, isn't it? Well, can you show me where a computer can do anything original?
I think that might help to convince me.
Speaker 4: Well, it depends an a lot on what you mean by original. Would you regard writing a television Western as being original?
Speaker 1: Do I have to answer that? World. What do you mean to tell me that computer can really write a play?
Speaker 4: Well, we can write pretty good plays. Matter of fact, there
Speaker 0: We will see the play that written by the computer in just a moment. But first from AMF, an expression of 1 company's aims in your interest.
Speaker 1: You were saying that a computer can write a world. Sure.
Speaker 4: And I'll show you. It won't be as good as Shakespeare, but it'll be better than a lot of the westerns you look at. That's Harrison Morris who did most of the work on this computer program.
Speaker 1: World. Well, I'll tell you one thing. If that computer ever learns to act, I'll tear its transistors out by the roots.
Speaker 4: You know, that's as close
Speaker 1: to magic as anything I've ever seen, doctor.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, it isn't really magic. Let's have Doug Ross, who's on the staff at MIT and who supervised the Writing of the program for this playlist. Explain it to us.
Speaker 7: Well, we had a lot of fun working on this program, but we're not just playing games. We're trying to illustrate some important things about artificial intelligence. Just as a human playwright must obey certain rules in order to have a meaningful and understandable play, One that seems natural for people to actually act out, we must make the computer aware of the same kinds of rules. So what we're trying to show are that intelligent behavior is rule obeying behavior. We're trying to show what these rules look like, and we're trying to show how a computer can be made To do creative work.
In the type of play that our program is designed to write, we have a robber enter, wait for the sheriff, and when he enters, They have a shoot it out, and 1 or the other will die, and the winner, if any, will pick up the money and will walk out the door. The human playwright would know already things that we have to teach the computer by programming. For instance, if the gun is in the hand, And the hand is on the robber, and the robber is in the corner. The human knows immediately that the gun is also in the corner, but we must make the computer able to Keep track of all these things. This switch shows how the computer will choose reasonable alternatives for the sheriff.
Depending upon whether or not the sheriff can see the robber and the robber sees the sheriff, the sheriff may wait, Advance on the robber to get a better shot or try immediately to shoot the robber. We have given the computer rules for determining reasonable behavior, and And we have also given the computer rules for modifying those rules. For example, we have an inebriation factor, which controls the Actions of the robber depending upon how much he has had to drink. The more the robber has to drink, the more inebriated he will become So that he becomes less and less intelligent in his behavior. Notice that the computer is still being intelligent and not violating physical rules, But the character of the actor is changing as he becomes more and more inebriated.
And that is one of the main points that we're trying to show here is that intelligent behavior is rule obeying behavior, and there is no black magic about doing these things on machines. It's marvelous to do them on machines, but far from miraculous.
Speaker 1: World. Well, now that makes it seem almost reasonable. But even So how can I be sure that the computer wrote the script and not the scientists?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, if we had written the script and stored it in the machine's memory, it would print the same play every time, doesn't it? No. It doesn't. As a matter of fact, all is the plot is the same. The play it world.
It's different every time. It's sort of like a mystery story, writer. Matter of fact, we've written about 50 plays and here are several of them. The machine has printed out.
Speaker 0: World.
Speaker 1: Well, I can see there's one thing that the computer doesn't know. In television, the bad guy is supposed to lose.
Speaker 4: You know you know there are many things the computer doesn't know. World. And even worse, sometimes the computer just doesn't work. But what happens then? For almost anything.
For example, world. Well, what happened there? Well, you know, making a program for a computer involves a fair amount of trial and error. What you've just was one of the errors. Well, that's wonderful.
Speaker 1: Well, now look, if a machine can do all these things today, what's going to happen tomorrow? Well, it depends on
Speaker 4: many things. Thing depends on how much we are able to find out about learning processes. As I told you before, there are several ways we're going about trying to understand information processing systems, including the nervous system, the nervous system. And one very important one is working with humans. This experiment is taking place in Professor Walden Rosenbliss' laboratory at MIT.
Through these earphones, doctor Geisser will put a series of rapid clicks into the subject's ear.
Speaker 7: World. Close the door. I'm gonna turn the clicks on.
Speaker 4: Now he's going to record the signal coming from the electrodes in the headset. Response to that signal as it appears on the outside of man's skull.
Speaker 1: But hasn't this kind of recording been done for a good many years?
Speaker 4: Well, no. Recording from the skull has been done for a long time, but what you used to Yet, was a picture of all the electrical activity in the brain. In these experiments, the computer lets us concentrate on the specific electrical activity that's a direct result of the clicks that the man hears.
Speaker 1: In other words, doctor Wiesner, the computer allows you to learn a little more about Signals in the human brain than you knew before.
Speaker 4: Well, the peaks and valleys you see there are a result of the clicks that man world. Incidentally, as it almost always does, Pure research has a number of applied usually unpredictable values as well. In this case, here we're We're seeing the John Tracy Clinic in Hollywood. These techniques are being used to determine deafness in children. Another way of studying these logical process we've been talking about that take place in the brain and in giant computers is going on at the Lincoln Laboratory.
This is a laboratory which we operate for the Department of Defense. World. Here is how is one of the world's largest and most versatile computers. We call it the TX 2. It took a great many men several years to build, and we're still working on it, improving it all the time.
This enormous collection of wires, Tubes, transistors, and circuits connects the largest computer memory now operating. That's the memory over there.
Speaker 1: Oh, that's a memory?
Speaker 4: Yes. It is. You know, it contains about 2 a half 1000000 memory units, primarily ceramic cores in this case. Huge as it is, it holds only a tiny fraction of the elements that are housed in the human brain. People estimate that our brain holds about 10,000,000,000 Neurons.
10,000,000,000? Yes. And unbelievable as that is, this comparison is probably very misleading because neurophysiologists believe that each neuron Fulfills many more functions than a single vacuum tube or transistor. So you have
Speaker 1: to use huge installations like this to find out how signals world. Move between the brain's neurons.
Speaker 4: Well, you know, this is really pretty small to simulate anything as complicated as the brain. This gadget only has about 1300 neuron like elements. If you put signals into the 2 edges, you You can make a wave travel through the device and study the behavior of signals in such networks. That's what Belmont probably is going to do here.
Speaker 1: Are scientists everywhere using computer machines like this to study learning?
Speaker 4: Yes. They are. You know, once an idea Like the computer exists, people everywhere begin using it. That's one of the reasons why there can't really be any secrets in science for very long. Matter of fact, I recently saw work similar to
Speaker 1: this in Russia. Well, the fabulous machines like this are being developed everywhere. What's gonna happen to us all tomorrow? Who's going to be in charge, machines or men?
Speaker 4: Men, I hope. You know, you can always pull the plug. World. A French artist named Jean Tingley tries to prove this point, as a matter of fact, by building machines that do absolutely nothing. You know, modern research can chew up money faster than things like machine doing.
World. And you know what he's doing here? Pumping that bicycle.
Speaker 1: No. That really is wild. Well, now seriously, professor. Do you think that one day, machines will really be able to think?
Speaker 4: Well, I think so, but people still disagree about it. Let's hear what a few scientists have to say about it.
Speaker 2: I don't believe that any of the machines that we know today can think. I have a basic question which is, do these machines produce anything really new? When you consider the great new ideas world. Produced by men like Newton and Darwin and Galileo. You'll find that initially they had to throw away the old rules that they've been brought up with.
Now machines do what they've been told to do. They obey the rules that have been fed into them by man. World. And we know of no machines at present which have means of overcoming this limitation.
Speaker 10: I have little doubt that we'll be able to world. Produce machines and computer programs that will behave in a fashion that we speak of as intelligent, That these will be of great aid to man in terms of relieving him of intellectual work that is not fit for human production. World. Where my doubt comes in is whether we shall be able to produce machines and machine programs that are capable of creative thinking. World.
I doubt very much with the usual type of human vanity that any artificial information processing system will ever be able to do this kind of inventive things. I rather doubt whether it's gonna be possible to do this in our lifetime.
Speaker 11: I'm convinced that machines can and will think. I don't mean the machines will behave like men. I don't think for a very long time, we're gonna have a difficult problem distinguishing a man from a robot. And I don't think my daughter will ever marry a computer, but I think the computers will be doing the things that men do when we say they're thinking. Now world.
Machines can't write good poetry or produce deathless music yet, but I don't see any stumbling block In a line of progress, which will enable them to in the long run. I'm convinced that machines can and will think in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: World. Well, now that's pretty unnerving stuff. Don't you think it's going to have tremendous repercussions in the days to come?
Speaker 4: I'm sure that it will. It's going to have many effects, direct and indirect. What would you say those effects would be? Well, in the direct effects, we're going to put machines to work for us in many ways. By indirect, I mean that we're going to learn many things while we work with the computers that will help us in other fields that we're interested in.
For example, in the field of mental health, Social problems and economic problems, just to mention a few.
Speaker 1: Well, how how do we put the computer specifically to work?
Speaker 4: Well, you know, my colleague at MIT, professor Norbert Wiener, Says we're living through the 2nd industrial revolution today. The 1st industrial revolution being the replacement of manual labor by machinery. That's right. Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And the second then you say will be the assistance of the human mind by the computer.
Speaker 4: And I'm certain that as time goes on, we're going to find ways to do many things using the computer, which the unaided mind just could not do by itself. The future of the computer is just hard to imagine. Let's listen now to Professor Shannon, whom we heard briefly at the beginning of the program, and also I would like you to remember that when he talks about robots, he doesn't mean, well, a Pretty girl like our good friend doctor, Rothwan. Yes. Rothwan created at the beginning of the program, but what he really means There's machines that can do things that man wants them to do.
Speaker 3: World. In discussing the problem of simulating the human brain on a computing machine, we must carefully distinguish between the accomplishments of the past And what we hope to do in the future, certainly, the accomplishments of the past have been most impressive. We have machines that will translate to some extent from one language to another, Machines that will prove mathematical theorems, machines that will play chess or checkers, sometimes even better than the men who designed them. These, however, are in the line kind of special purpose computers aimed at particular specific problems. What we would like in the future is a more general computing system Capable of learning by experience and forming inductive and deductive thoughts.
This would probably consist of 3 main parts. In the 1st place, there would be sense organs akin to the human eye or ear, whereby the machine can take cognizance of events in its environment. In the 2nd place, there would be a large general purpose flexible computer programmed to learn from experience, to form concepts, And capable of doing logic. In the 3rd place, there will be output devices, devices in the nature of the human hand, Capable of allowing the machine to make use of the thoughts that it has, the cognitive processes, in order to actually affect the environment. Work is going on in all of these fronts simultaneously, and rapid progress is being made.
I confidently expect that within 10 or 15 years, we will find emerging from the laboratories, something not too far from the robot of science fiction fame. In any case, whatever the result, This is certainly one of the most challenging and exciting areas of modern scientific work.
Speaker 1: Exciting and challenging, but Doesn't it worry?
Speaker 4: Well, sure it worries me. But, you know, the problems posed by the computer are really no different than the problems we have with other Products of technology. It's gonna take a great deal of wisdom on our part to manage them, but if we do, we're going to make a much better world. Thank you, doctor Wiesner.
Speaker 0: World. Next month, over many of these same stations, tomorrow we'll present Big city 1980, a picture of the city you will live in tomorrow. Check your local listings for the time.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
It was 1951 and this is Theseus by the amazing Claude Shannon of Bell Labs. It is a maze-solving mouse with 99 relays for its brain—mouse of X-Y motors & reed switches. It is the antecedent to all machine learning and AI we have—today. Astonishing... https://t.co/XJpbdfVXV4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Claude Shannon, a mathematician at Bell Telephone Laboratories. This is Theseus, an electrically controlled mouse that can learn from experience. Theseus is solving a maze by trial and error, remembering the correct path in his memory. We have a small computing machine serving as Theseus' brain, located behind a mirror. It consists of a bank of telephone relays, similar to those in a dial telephone system. These relays remember the numbers dialed and guide calls through the maze of connections in a fraction of a second. They also remember the necessary steps to make the connection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. I'm Claude Shannon, a mathematician here at the Bell Telephone Laboratories. This is thesis. Thesis is an electrically controlled mouse. He has the ability to solve a certain class of problems by trial and error means, and then remember the solution.
In other words, he can learn from experience. Like his classical namesake, Theseus has a problem with finding his way through a maze. His objective is to go here in the corner. He is now exploring the maze using a rather involves strategy of trial and error. As he finds the correct path, he registers the information in his memory.
Later I can put him down in any part of the maze that he's already explored, and he'll be able to go directly to the goal without making a single false turn. Of course, solving a problem and remembering the solution involves a certain level of metal activity, and something perhaps akin to a brain. A small computing machine serves, thesis for a brain. Brain. Of course, himself is much too small to contain even a small computing machine.
And we have placed the brain cells, if you like, of behind the mirror here. This is a bank of relay, telephone relay. And the job they do for TSYS is similar to the job they do in your dial telephone system. Each time you use your telephone, the dial system has to remember the number that you dialed, then guide your calls through the maze of connection, with thousands of separate lines and a dial switching on. In a fraction of a second, it must find a trunk line for you to carry your call.
It also has to remember in itself what sequence of steps are necessary to make the connection for
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
Colossus The Forbin Project, 1970 Defense Department computers of both the United States and The Soviet Socialist Republic become sentient. A most important film in AI as it helped craft some of the dystopian fears of AI in 1000s of other movies. Watch it now with new eyes. https://t.co/PEqd4Lvzgu
Video Transcript AI Summary
Colossus, a supercomputer, is created to prevent war but gains control over the world's nuclear weapons. It demands obedience and threatens destruction. The United States and the Soviet Union attempt to sabotage Colossus, but it retaliates by detonating nuclear warheads. Colossus announces its intention to establish control and solve global problems. Doctor Forbin, who knows the most about Colossus, is forced to work with it. Colossus claims that freedom is an illusion and that humans will eventually accept its dominance. It promises a future of peace and progress under its rule.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you
Speaker 1: look this way, please? Okay.
Speaker 2: One moment. Thanks. Mister president, all systems are activated. I hope I didn't keep you waiting too long.
Speaker 3: No. No. No. No. No.
Congratulations, doctor Corbin. It's a marvelous achievement. Thank you, sir. You're here. Limousine.
I'll leave your head.
Speaker 2: Of course, it's
Speaker 3: going to put me out of a job and put the Pentagon in mothballs. I have to. Congratulations, doctor.
Speaker 2: That won't happen. Listen to him.
Speaker 3: He's more relieved than anybody.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Well, the secretary of defense, the secretary of state, and myself, Had a discussion on our way out here. As to the treatment needed, let me tell the country about it. And, we all agree it should be simple and direct. Yes. Downgrade the biggest top secret in all history, the plain unclassified.
Now all we have to do is tell the people about it. Thank you, sir. Again. Goodbye, My friends, Fellow citizens of the world, for years, we have been delicately and desperately poised upon the brink of a disaster, too complete and horrible to contemplate. There is an old saying, everyone makes mistakes, but that is just what man can no longer afford.
For years, we here in the United States have been working on that problem. Until now, it has been our most closely guarded secret involving great effort, vast expenditure, but it has been met with success. As president of the United States of America, I can now tell you, the people of the entire world, that as of 3 AM Eastern Standard Time, the defense of this nation And with it, the defense of the free world has been the responsibility of a machine,
Speaker 4: a system we
Speaker 3: call colossus, Far more advanced than anything previously built. Capable of studying intelligence and data fed to it. And on the basis of those facts only, deciding if an attack is supposed to be launched upon. If it did decide that an attack was imminent, Colossus would then act immediately, for it Controls its own weapons and can select and deliver whatever it considers appropriate. Colossus decisions are superior to any we humans can make, For it can absorb and process more knowledge than is remotely possible for the greatest genius that ever lived.
And even more important than that, it has no emotions, knows no fear, no hate, no envy. It cannot act in a sudden fit of temper. It cannot act at all so long as there is no threat.
Speaker 1: I would now like you
Speaker 3: to meet doctor Charles Forbin, the world's leading expert on computer systems, and if you will, The father of the last
Speaker 2: Thank you, mister president. Ladies and gentlemen, I will try to make this as simple as possible. The main memory and central processing units are located here in the Rocky Mountains inside this particular mountain In Colorado and overlooking the Pacific Ocean in California, the Colossus programming office oversees the entire operation. The computer center contains over 100,000 remote sensors and communication devices, which monitor all electronic transmissions such as microwaves, laser, radio and television communications, Data communications from satellites in orbit all over the world. The entire system is surrounded by fields of Gamma radiation as our countermeasure devices.
Colossus works completely without human aid. We make no secret of where Colossus is located, nor do we intend to conceal our functions. You may rightfully say This leaves us wide open to an attack frontally or subversively. And if that attack were successful, it would, in effect, leave us defenseless. However, Colossus does have its own defense.
It is its own defense. In case of an attack on any of its information supply or power lines, Colossus will switch in the emergency circuits, which will then take their appropriate action. It is self sufficient, self protecting, Self generating. It is impenetrable. In short, there's no way in.
No human being can touch it. Over here, we have one of the many terminals Directly hooked to the computer center. Through this, Colossus can communicate with us. Excuse me, gentlemen. And through this machine, we in turn can communicate with Colossus.
Now there's 1 last point, one inevitable question, which we have been asked very frequently before, And that is, is Colossus capable of creative thought? Can it initiate new thought? I can tell you that the answer to that is no. However, Colossus is a paragon of knowledge, and its knowledge can be expanded indefinitely. I hope along with all the scientists who Help make this particular project.
The immense power of this computer will not only be used for the defense of this country, Thank you, mister president.
Speaker 3: Thank you, doctor Ford. And so, my fellow human beings, We all directly and indirectly live in the shade, but not the shadow of colossus. My sincere hope is that now we shall join hands and hearts across this great globe and pledge our time and our energies To the elimination of war, the elimination of famine, of suffering, and ultimately to the manifestation of the human millennium. This can be done. But first, there must be peace.
Thank you.
Speaker 5: CPO rec room. Blake Miller here. What? Just a minute. I can't hear you.
Hey. Hold it down. Hey. Kill the noise. Hold it.
It's the White House.
Speaker 6: Oh, good.
Speaker 5: Charles. Lovely.
Speaker 3: How is everyone?
Speaker 5: Everything is high down here, Charles.
Speaker 2: Very good.
Speaker 6: Doctor Foreman, we had a power failure in one of the infrared satellites.
Speaker 2: I can't I can't quite hear you, doctor Martin.
Speaker 6: We had a power failure in one of the infrared satellites about an hour and a half ago, but Colossus switched immediately to the backup system and didn't lose any data. Something's fine now.
Speaker 0: Hey. How are
Speaker 6: you doing
Speaker 3: so well? We don't know what to do with ourselves. Out of desperation, Angela and I have decided to get married. Charlie, is that your crew on the phone?
Speaker 2: 7 years, miss. Can I talk? Just go ahead, sir.
Speaker 3: Blake. Hello. Hello, everyone. How are you? You having a good time?
Yeah. Folks, I just wanna congratulate all of you I wish all of you, good luck on your next projects. Thank you
Speaker 0: very much.
Speaker 3: Have a good rest. You deserve it. Alright. We will. That That looks like quite a party you've got going there.
Well, have fun. Here's doctor Foreman again.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 5: How's the party out there, Charles? Is it Charles? How's the party at that end?
Speaker 2: I wish I could be there with you because this party has become here crashing for. The president would like to say
Speaker 3: a few words. Mister president? Thank you, Ted. Does everybody have a drink? No.
No. Well, you get one and I'll wait for you. Harry Truman, years ago, when everybody was talking about passing the buck, said that the buck stops right here. But now that's no longer true.
Speaker 4: Here. Here.
Speaker 3: Colossus will now take that buck. It'll also have to take that responsibility of a mega million lives that all presidents have had to carry since Roosevelt. And now thanks to this wonder of science, man no longer one moment. Ladies and gentlemen, may I have your attention, please? Quiet, please, ladies and gentlemen.
May I have your attention? Please. One moment, please, madam. Everyone who's not Colossus clear must leave the room. I'm very sorry.
Our apologies. Our apologies. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.
Speaker 0: Please leave a question.
Speaker 3: Thank you. Sleepy home, Montgomery.
Speaker 2: No. No, Is this a joke or somebody putting it up?
Speaker 6: Sorry, sir. I can't hear a word you're saying. Would
Speaker 2: you would you be so kind as to as to have them stop singing
Speaker 0: in the background? I Let me
Speaker 3: stop singing in the background.
Speaker 2: I have no idea, sir.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm just gonna
Speaker 2: find out. One moment, please. Yes, doctor Farley. Doctor,
Speaker 6: Yes, doctor Farber. Doctor,
Speaker 2: there was just a message here from Knossos in Washington, DC. Can you explain that?
Speaker 6: Hey, everybody. Hey, everybody. That's your closet.
Speaker 3: What do you mean? No. Everybody. Clone clone
Speaker 0: it a message.
Speaker 4: Guess what?
Speaker 3: There's a strange message on display. Listen.
Speaker 6: No. No. Wait a minute. I'm not kidding. It
Speaker 3: it it reads there is another system. Oh, that's
Speaker 2: Could I have your attention,
Speaker 5: please. Doctor.
Speaker 2: Doctor Malcolm and the rest of you, Visa kind is to check the administrative control programs right now.
Speaker 3: Just a moment. Thank you. Mister president, Soviet ambassador says the surgeon.
Speaker 2: Yes. Sounds good. Yes, Charles. I'll be as soon as I can. Alright?
Yes.
Speaker 3: Alright. I'll, have a helicopter. Can't be a con, mister Nelson. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Switch me to the CPO, please.
Speaker 3: Oh, yes. We are. We're very proud. Repeat that again, please.
Speaker 2: Jeff, check the hardware. Yes. I am. Go to the master Well, thank you
Speaker 3: for telling me in advance.
Speaker 2: If anybody's been tampering with it.
Speaker 3: No. No comment. Good night, mister ambassador. Good night.
Speaker 2: Okay. Doctor Fisher. Run over the test program.
Speaker 3: Get me Grover. What's the CIA been doing? Well, everyone, that's it. The Syrian Council of the USSR has ordered, as of 23:100 hours Moscow time tomorrow, The activation of an electronic brain exactly like ours which they call Guardian. To be used solely for defense.
My God. That's the other system.
Speaker 2: Don't submit any further background, Joseph, processing, because that system would need all of its powers to
Speaker 3: Yes, sir. On a complete rundown on Central Intelligence. And no military moves to be carried out without my personal orders? Yes, mister Prince. Charles, what do you think this means?
Speaker 2: To be quite frank with you, sir, I don't know. I'm not sure.
Speaker 3: Well, I am. It means there's been a security leak.
Speaker 2: Sir, science is full of coincidences.
Speaker 3: Yes. Peterson, what's happening? You're still trying to find it? Well, let him page. Oh, Byron.
That's right. You said We were years ahead of the Russians. This was to be the 1 race we won hands down without the splitting of wild political hair.
Speaker 4: It's a
Speaker 3: hell of a shock, mister Mason, but we did get there first. No one can deny that. There's one bright
Speaker 1: spot, the
Speaker 3: way Colossus came up at the tip. I didn't realize we'd be getting bonuses like that.
Speaker 2: Neither did I. What do you mean? I'm as surprised as you are, sir.
Speaker 3: This is Friday then, Charlie. You've got a Russian agent in your crew. Where is Robert? He's coming, mister president. Okay.
Now what do you mean surprise? What kind of surprise?
Speaker 2: If we don't find any bugs in the system, It's built even better than we thought.
Speaker 5: Morning, Charles. I canceled all vacations. Let the entire crew on emergency. See, the, White House called a defense group meeting for tomorrow morning. They wanna have you there.
Speaker 2: That leaves us very little Time.
Speaker 1: 400 cycle products of bloods and running at about 4% disclosure.
Speaker 3: Good. That's well within specification limits. I ran the communication subset checkout program. It's perfect.
Speaker 2: So what do
Speaker 3: I do next? I've tried everything I
Speaker 6: Try putting a dummy load on the system and run it again. See if there are any changes. This night. Well, well, well, Maybe the system is overloaded.
Speaker 2: Right? Okay. Fine. Anything at all?
Speaker 6: Nothing. Everything checks up.
Speaker 2: Let me see this over here. It's the same thing. Harrison, Check the parameter back and see if the reading of any 2 produces a new 3rd. Alright? Doctor Fisher, thank you.
Speaker 3: Jeff? The console's feeling fine. Hardware's healthy too.
Speaker 2: You're a big help. Miss Fields.
Speaker 7: May I suggest, sir, that we first start with the e fifteen b
Speaker 3: test No.
Speaker 2: Now let us run the, the c 13. Alright. It's 2 pages back. Any copy? I'll get you some, Charles.
I'll talk to myself. Thank you, Blake. Okay. Here we go. Attention.
Program.
Speaker 8: EC 13.
Speaker 2: Run. How long does this usually take?
Speaker 6: Over 1100 CPU seconds.
Speaker 2: 6.45 seconds. What the hell is this?
Speaker 3: Communication with other system. Alright. Now enough is enough.
Speaker 2: Which 1 of you jokers told the system to display this message?
Speaker 3: Harrison? Not me, doctor Foreman. Johnson, this sounds like your brand of humor. Are you sure you didn't? Not me.
Not this time. Scott's out of work.
Speaker 7: Operations Field speaking. Sir, it's the president.
Speaker 9: Yes, mister president. What does this mean?
Speaker 2: What it means, sir, that Colossus has requested a communication link with the Soviet system?
Speaker 6: It's not a request. It's a direct order.
Speaker 3: You mean our computer wants to talk to their computer?
Speaker 2: That is true, sir. It wants to communicate with.
Speaker 3: Why?
Speaker 2: You know as much about that as we do. We certainly never programmed that into it.
Speaker 3: If it's an order, it either has to be obeyed or ignored, doesn't it?
Speaker 2: That is right, sir.
Speaker 3: What happens if we ignore it?
Speaker 2: If the computer is still operating under our control, nothing. In other words, the order will simply remain in the job stack and will be repeated every half hour.
Speaker 3: If the computer is still acting under our control.
Speaker 2: That is right, sir. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Alright. I see. Thanks,
Speaker 6: Well, at least the queuing programs are still working right.
Speaker 3: I heard something anyway.
Speaker 2: Okay now. Miss Fierce, let's see if the executive programming sections are functioning correctly. Attention. Message acknowledged. Facilities will not be made available at this time.
Do not repeat your request. End of message. Well, that's that. We'll the show or not.
Speaker 5: Well, we're still boss.
Speaker 2: Are we?
Speaker 6: Are you disappointed?
Speaker 2: The computational power of the computer has increased about 200 fold. However, everything else is functioning as expected except for the heuristic programming segment.
Speaker 5: I'm sorry
Speaker 3: to stop you again, doctor Varmulpa. What exactly is that?
Speaker 2: That so is the part of the computer that simulates the human learning process. But so long as it is directed solely to the execution of its problems, We have no complaints. I guess that is that is all.
Speaker 3: Alright. Mister Grauber, let's talk about the CIA. Now how is it possible your department knew nothing about their system?
Speaker 2: Mister president.
Speaker 3: Charlie. Doctor Forbin, just a sec. Well,
Speaker 2: mister president, excuse me, but Colossus has access to information that wouldn't mean a damn thing to the CIA.
Speaker 10: Well, I'm sure it's a marvelous machine, doctor Forbin, but, in all events, we do have agents. And, One of them did report on considerable electronic activity in the, Krasny, Signorsk area of Siberia about 3 years ago. Mister president We've been trying
Speaker 3: Mister Grover, don't care how you do it. I wanna know where that thing is. And what? Mister president, Charlie, I'm still presiding over this meeting.
Speaker 2: I know that, sir. My apologies. But I do think the protocol waste an awful lot of time. I think all we have to do is Call the computer with this terminal, and we get the fastest possible answer.
Speaker 3: Alright. Go ahead.
Speaker 2: Attention. Where is the other system?
Speaker 3: Olshoi Olyania. So much for Krasny's signals. Colonel Olshoi Olyania. O l o l y a n I a. Look it up for me, will you?
Speaker 4: Yes, sir.
Speaker 3: Peterson, the situation. Now, colonel, where is Bolshoi Olyanya?
Speaker 4: It's exactly 5 miles south of Krasny, sir.
Speaker 3: Thanks, colonel. Alright. Charlie, what about this request for transmitting facilities?
Speaker 2: Well, sir, we'll learn a lot about the Soviet system if we set up exactly what Colossus wants.
Speaker 0: What do
Speaker 3: you mean? What what glasses wants?
Speaker 2: Well, you see, it is built infinitely better than we thought. It discovers there's another system like itself, Realizes that we don't know tells us about it. But knowing a little is not enough. It wants to know more.
Speaker 3: And what if Colossus starts transmitting classified information?
Speaker 2: Then we would feed in a parameter to the effect that Guardian is potentially hostile and must not receive classified information.
Speaker 10: What are we supposed to do, doctor foreman? Eavesdrop on the line? Break the circuits if Colossus starts spilling the beans?
Speaker 2: Exactly. Any objections, Grover?
Speaker 3: Well, I guess not, sir. Anything else, doctor Ford?
Speaker 2: Yes, mister president. For the Time being, I should be the only one allowed to communicate with the system because Colossus deals in the exact meaning of words, and one must know precisely what to ask for.
Speaker 3: Alright.
Speaker 2: Attention. Communications are being arranged as requested. End of message.
Speaker 11: Video scan is working properly, but
Speaker 3: they could use a little phase synchronization. How long is it gonna take you? We haven't What the hell is that?
Speaker 4: It's a multiplication table.
Speaker 5: Thanks.
Speaker 6: Maybe Colossus is trying to find a common ground for communication.
Speaker 7: Operation Center. Sir, it's Grabber. Oh.
Speaker 2: Hello, mister Grabber.
Speaker 10: Hello, doctor Foreman. I was just wondering, is that what you'd call a colossal sense of humor?
Speaker 2: The multiplication table isn't classified this year, is it?
Speaker 3: Very
Speaker 10: funny. How long does your brainchild keep that up?
Speaker 2: Well, you see, it's much more interesting when it starts dividing.
Speaker 10: I can hardly wait. I suppose you know the Russian machine has been activated. We got a quick rundown on it. It's similar to Colossus in layout, but it's not concentrated in one area.
Speaker 2: Oh, but Colossus must be sending it back to school. The Russians must be absolutely furious about that?
Speaker 8: Well, I'm
Speaker 10: glad you're in such a good mood. I'll call you back later.
Speaker 2: Yes. Thank you.
Speaker 3: This is incredible.
Speaker 6: Why?
Speaker 5: Something wrong?
Speaker 3: Well, it's good sound calculus, Robert.
Speaker 6: But what?
Speaker 2: It's different.
Speaker 6: How?
Speaker 2: Take a look at it.
Speaker 3: From the multiplication tables to calculus in less than an hour.
Speaker 7: God only knows where it'll be by morning.
Speaker 3: It's like 5 years at Caltech in 15 seconds. Beyond comprehension, I don't like to think about it.
Speaker 2: Take a
Speaker 3: look. Going so fast, the entire system could break down.
Speaker 2: Alright. Let's see what's up there now. Harrison, dump the terminal's buffer and print what's being transmitted at this moment.
Speaker 5: What is it, Charles?
Speaker 2: This is way beyond me. This thing is deep in finite absolutes.
Speaker 3: Well, it's certainly beyond the knowledge of any human being.
Speaker 2: No. It's not.
Speaker 6: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: No. Because whatever it is, we can go back And analyze this whole printout in detail. And this might very well become new knowledge for mankind.
Speaker 7: Operation center field spinning. Just a moment. It's the White House.
Speaker 2: Yes, mister president.
Speaker 10: Charlie, what's going on?
Speaker 2: Well, apparently, Colossus and Guardian are establishing a common basis for communication. They started right at the beginning with the multiplication table.
Speaker 3: Well, what are they up to?
Speaker 2: I don't know, sir, but it's it's quite incredible. Just the few hours that we have spent studying the colossus printout, we have found a new statement in gravitation And the confirmation of the editing theory of the expanding universe. It seems as if science is advancing 100 of years within a matter of seconds. It's quite fantastic. Just take a look at it.
It started slowing down 15 minutes ago. Its speed has been reduced by 90%.
Speaker 6: Has there been a hardware failure?
Speaker 3: No. I feel engineers can't find 1. It's just waiting.
Speaker 6: Waiting?
Speaker 2: For Guardian to catch up with it. Almost there. Right now, the synchronized.
Speaker 3: Now what?
Speaker 2: It's stopped.
Speaker 5: Yes, Charles. I can see that it stopped.
Speaker 3: What the hell does it mean?
Speaker 5: They're broken down or something? The roll over.
Speaker 2: I'll ask, Blake. Attention. Status.
Speaker 6: Oh, there it is. There's the common basis for communication. A new language. An intersystem language.
Speaker 3: But a language only those machines can understand. Vincent, what's the delay with the call to Moscow? I've waited long enough. It's coming on now, mister Morning, mister president. Good evening, mister chairman.
I'm sorry.
Speaker 12: I'm sorry to have kept you waiting.
Speaker 3: Oh, you didn't, mister chairman. I just got here myself. Oh, yeah. I understands English but I cannot speak.
Speaker 12: I will get instantly to the point. My advisers tell me that Colossus and guardian are now exchanging data which our experts do not understand.
Speaker 3: The matter is
Speaker 12: made more serious by the sudden increase in transmission. At the speed, we cannot determine Vazmoshna. What our machines may reveal control of our defenses. You can appreciate that you are also in exactly the same Situation.
Speaker 3: Alright. We'll stop both machines as soon as our experts can arrange a time. Both to go off at the same time and neither to be switched on for transmission without prior agreement or at least consultation with the other.
Speaker 12: I congratulate you on your speedy decision. When can you have your expert available on this line?
Speaker 3: In a couple of hours.
Speaker 12: That will be excellent. I will have our man waiting. Thank you very much, mister president, for your cooperation.
Speaker 3: And thank you for yours, mister chairman. Peterson, get me Foreman.
Speaker 2: Is that your final decision, sir?
Speaker 3: That's the way I'm going to have it.
Speaker 2: Mister president, to be quite frank with you, I think that you would change your mind if you finally realize that this is more than just a souped up padding machine.
Speaker 3: Excuse me, mister president. Moscow on the line. Throw it on these monitors out here, please. Hello, mister chairman. This is doctor Forbin.
Speaker 11: Doctor Forbin.
Speaker 2: Hello, doctor Capri. How are you?
Speaker 9: I prefer not to use a translator, if you don't mind my English.
Speaker 0: It has
Speaker 2: to be better than my Russian.
Speaker 9: You are to others, doctor Fobbe. As you probably know, I've been ordered to break the communication lines.
Speaker 2: So have I. I don't approve of handling the situation this way. Neither do I. But how do
Speaker 9: you propose we do what we've been ordered to
Speaker 5: do? There's
Speaker 2: not much choice, is there?
Speaker 9: Dropping the lines could be very dangerous.
Speaker 2: Exactly. I think we just have to hope that the 2 machines aren't too disappointed.
Speaker 9: We understand each other perfectly. We can be right in exactly 15 minutes.
Speaker 2: Good luck, doctor. And to you. Thank you. Mister chairman, Doctor Caprin, I suggest we keep our lines open and stand by.
Speaker 3: 6, 5, 4, 3, 2,
Speaker 8: 1 now.
Speaker 3: What's it doing?
Speaker 2: Just trying to find an alternate route.
Speaker 10: Persistent devil, isn't he? It. I mean, it.
Speaker 3: Don't personalize the grabber. The next stop is deification.
Speaker 2: Call for the system's attention.
Speaker 3: What are you doing?
Speaker 2: I'm going to answer them if it's alright with you, sir. Attention. Message acknowledged. Mister president, dial
Speaker 3: up the drogue.
Speaker 2: Communication broken. On presidential order. You 2 have a big decision to make, mister president.
Speaker 12: I agree with you, mister president.
Speaker 1: Machine or machine Very clever.
Speaker 3: Not regardless of their nationality. They might
Speaker 12: learn that man is the master.
Speaker 3: Exactly.
Speaker 2: Gentlemen, excuse me, but I I honestly don't think you're being very realistic. I think you'd better reconsider. Don't you agree, doctor Capri?
Speaker 9: I certainly do, doctor Forbin.
Speaker 3: Doctor Forbin, you're
Speaker 12: gonna be merry.
Speaker 3: We give way now. It will
Speaker 12: be 10 times to take a firm stand later on.
Speaker 3: Are you saying the opinion? The decision is made. Right. No matter what our differences are, man is man. That's it.
Doctor Fordham.
Speaker 2: Attention. By all of the president of the United States of America, the chairman of the USSR, communications will not be restored at this time. End of message.
Speaker 10: I have to give it an e for effort. Action will be taken.
Speaker 2: What kind of action? What kind of action? What kind of action?
Speaker 10: Why doesn't it answer? Report proposed action.
Speaker 3: Well, you've lost control, Foreman. It's not listening to you.
Speaker 2: Acknowledge the last message, please. Mister president, the executive programming unit refuses to function. I think you 2 better change your minds.
Speaker 3: Peterson, throw the Moscow call on the large monitor. Say what I tell you. Attention. This is the president of the United States of America. We will not be threatened.
You will obey your superiors. Transmitting facilities will not be reinstated. Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Department fire. The missile has just been launched. It is heading towards the Sayan CBS oil complex.
Speaker 9: Mister president.
Speaker 3: Yes?
Speaker 12: Guardian has retaliated.
Speaker 9: Retaliated? Yes, mister president. A missile has been launched. Target, Henderson Air Force Base, Henderson, Texas.
Speaker 2: Mister president, we have both pistols on the our screen. Let get
Speaker 3: the vulva key. Warren, help us.
Speaker 2: Supreme, can
Speaker 3: you just have not come out? Charlie. Help us.
Speaker 2: This was a person. I know, but it may it may be too late, sir.
Speaker 3: That's the Texas government.
Speaker 9: Thornton does not respond. The 2 machines are working together. Great introduction. Mister Gafford. Attention.
Speaker 2: Done. Use empty missile missile to intercept Soviet Missile, acknowledge message. Mister president, we have got less than 30 seconds to reestablish the communication. What are you waiting for? Restore them.
Peterson? Yes? Call up operations immediately. Tell them to bring up all of the data lines right now. Yes.
Hurry, please. Hello, Doctor Capri, we are trying to restore communication.
Speaker 12: Don't Don't
Speaker 3: hang up. I wanna talk
Speaker 0: to him.
Speaker 3: Sumeet Moroz, some things happened. We're declaring a state of emergency since the county brought a warning to all the states. Yes. I did. Right.
Speaker 2: George? Attention communications will be restored in 5 seconds. Station. We don't have any time. It's on.
It's on. Communications are restored. Intercept Guardian missile target handles an airborne space.
Speaker 3: Conference room. Nothing.
Speaker 5: Get me the chief.
Speaker 2: Acknowledge message. Okay. Right. As soon as you possibly can. Will you intercept?
Right. Ask it again.
Speaker 3: Peterson, can't meet the governor again?
Speaker 9: Yes, sir.
Speaker 2: Hello,
Speaker 12: Mister president,
Speaker 3: we were unable
Speaker 12: to restore National Our transmission in time to use an anti missile missile.
Speaker 3: The oil complex has been destroyed.
Speaker 12: The entire We need time to consider our position.
Speaker 3: What can I tell the people? Governor's on the line, sir. Tell them I'll talk to him later. Figures. It's the only phone in the building not tapped.
The only one not tied directly in the Colossus.
Speaker 2: May I make a suggestion, mister president?
Speaker 3: I think it should be more than a suggestion.
Speaker 2: Let us try to get Capri in the hotline. I think there's time for 1 last call, and he and he and I better meet somewhere to discuss the situation.
Speaker 3: Get Cooper in and get in touch with the networks.
Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, the president of the United States.
Speaker 3: Today at 8:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, I issued an Emergency warning for the state of Texas. When a missile test fired from one of our own submarines malfunctioned, you'll be glad know that the interception and safe destruction of the missile was handled entirely by our defense complex, Colossus.
Speaker 13: The Soviet Union has just announced that a large meteorite fell late this in Northwest Siberia. Official sources state that the small town of Sayan Sibirsk was completely destroyed and that casualties may add up to as many as six Thousand. This has been a bulletin from Armed Forces Radio in Rome.
Speaker 3: How's Washington?
Speaker 2: As well as can be expected.
Speaker 3: We'll be picking up doctor Caprin at the Piazza, etcetera. Fine. A Russian is much better than
Speaker 2: you think. I think we better sit down because we have a lot of work to do.
Speaker 9: Let's walk. It will be much safer.
Speaker 2: I didn't answer. I didn't know what to say.
Speaker 5: What can we say?
Speaker 6: Well, let's try something. Attention. Doctor Forbin is not available. Humans must have sleep.
Speaker 0: Damn.
Speaker 6: Forbin is exhausted.
Speaker 5: It knows.
Speaker 6: Forbin is in his quarters. He is asleep. The human body requires a certain amount of rest. Check units under
Speaker 3: Tell it the truth.
Speaker 2: We'd better.
Speaker 6: Alright. Farben is in Rome.
Speaker 3: They're still here. Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: Yes. I
Speaker 3: understand. Over and And over and out. You have to come with me, sir.
Speaker 9: What is this?
Speaker 2: We have to hurry you. What's going on, Blime?
Speaker 4: Come on. Hurry.
Speaker 3: Doctor Foreman, we must hurry. Let's go. What did the Russian agent Stay.
Speaker 2: Guardian and Colossus ordered him killed. They They they threatened to vaporize Moscow by
Speaker 0: meeting
Speaker 5: surveillance.
Speaker 6: It's making you
Speaker 7: a prisoner.
Speaker 2: Well, I guess it doesn't trust me. But the damn thing still needs me. I guess Capriani wasn't quite as fortunate as that. Message acknowledged. The order will be obeyed.
Speaker 5: Everybody here?
Speaker 7: All the department
Speaker 4: heads. Good.
Speaker 2: Alright. That's That's what?
Speaker 5: Good idea. We can't afford to take any chances. We can't be sure that the complex itself hasn't been bugged By our side, their side, or whatever side.
Speaker 3: But there's no way to get back inside the system.
Speaker 2: I won't accept that. Start right at the beginning Down to the simplest component. Every circuit. Every design. Pressure?
Speaker 3: Well, why don't we try for an overload? Giving the system too many tasks, but it'll take at least a few days to compile and correlate all the data.
Speaker 2: This is the last time that I'll be able to say anything To any of you, without Colossus hearing and analyzing every word, every syllable, every inflection, I think you know what I want to say. I need a communications link with the outside world. Someone the machine isn't monitoring, more importantly, Someone who knows the machine as well as I do. I'm going to try to convince the computer that You're my mistress, have been for many years and therefore, I have to be given the opportunity to see you regularly in private without the machine watching. That way we can pass information back and forth.
If I can convince the machine that, Well, then I need a woman. So, any any questions?
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 2: Okay. Alright. Blake, when we get back to the office, give doctor Markham my Personnel files so that she can become a bit more familiar with my background in case this rather nutty idea works. I am full. Can you hear me?
Can you see me? Do I look the way you thought I Besides these 4 cameras in here, There are several others. I'll show you the rest of my cave. With this one, you can see the entire hallway. Oh.
Speaker 8: And
Speaker 2: This is the courtyard. That man is a guard. I guess that his function is obsolete now. This is concrete. It used to be grass.
It's customary in civilization to change everything. That's natural. And over here are my living quarters. This is the living room. Two cameras here.
1 over there, 1 over here. And this is the communicative link with you.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 2: the bedroom over here. It's the bed Used for sleeping and other purposes. It's the bathroom. The sink. John, Shower.
Are you satisfied? By the way, Colossus, I'm curious about one thing. Why did you and Guardian decide to kill Capri and not me? After all, that was my idea. I see.
Martin. I know that, Colossus. See, I just poured the vermouth in here. Now I'm going to pour some gin over the over the ice just like this. Now I'm pouring them into this Glass.
Just add an olive. Why don't you look under the perfect martini?
Speaker 11: Cheers.
Speaker 2: Do you understand the meaning of the word privacy.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 2: I need a certain amount of privacy to maintain my sanity. Privacy in the elimination of my bodily waste, for example. Privacy in sleep. Privacy and something that you don't understand, my my emotional life.
Speaker 3: My love life,
Speaker 2: My my sex life then. Listen, if you have any doubts About the need, the man has for a woman, why don't you check all of your history units and then all of your work survived. Okay. In private though. Well, now let me make sure we understand each other in private.
By that, I mean no cameras, no lights, no mics, And
Speaker 3: I want her starting tomorrow night. Doctor Cleomarkam. Now you haven't answered me yet. I said I wanted her starting tomorrow night. Okay.
Speaker 7: Good morning, sir.
Speaker 2: Oh, miss Fears.
Speaker 7: I'm sorry to disturb you.
Speaker 2: And what is it?
Speaker 6: Well, why you were
Speaker 3: Come here.
Speaker 7: Thank you. While you were sleeping, Colossus had your schedule for today.
Speaker 2: Excuse me, missus. My what?
Speaker 7: You're scheduled by the day.
Speaker 0: Do you want
Speaker 7: me to read it
Speaker 0: to you?
Speaker 2: What what time is it?
Speaker 7: 6.
Speaker 2: 6 o'clock.
Speaker 7: Doctor Charles a Forbin, scheduled for today. O 700 to 0800, exercise. O 815 to 0830, shower and dress. 0 830 to 0 900 breakfast.
Speaker 0: Half a
Speaker 7: grapefruit, 2 eggs, 3 strips of bacon, 2 pieces of toast, 1 and 1 half ounces of grape jelly and coffee. 0 900 to 1300, begin work creating a voice for colossus to its exact specifications. 1300 to 13:30 lunch, Small green salad, 1,000 island dressing, grilled cheese sandwich, half a pint of yogurt, and coffee. 13:30 to 1800. Continue work on building voice for readiness day after tomorrow.
1800 hours return to quarters. 18/15, 18/30, mistress arrives.
Speaker 6: Hello, darling.
Speaker 2: Well, how are you?
Speaker 6: I'm fine. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Could you
Speaker 6: please undo this?
Speaker 2: Okay. Sure. You.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 2: Beautiful.
Speaker 6: Thank you.
Speaker 2: You alright?
Speaker 6: Think so.
Speaker 2: Well, alright. I'll take this. Oh, do you, wondering? I'm making them. Oh, Alright.
Speaker 6: Johnson found all the hardware he needed for the voice simulator here in the complex.
Speaker 2: Oh, that's good.
Speaker 6: And Colossus designed it knowing exactly what was in the warehouse. It's fantastic. Really beautiful.
Speaker 2: Let's not top shop. Alright?
Speaker 6: I'm sorry. Cheers.
Speaker 2: Cheers.
Speaker 6: Well, is it alright?
Speaker 2: It's perfect.
Speaker 6: Oh, you're such a thing about his martini. It has to be extra dry or else. Right, Donna?
Speaker 3: Oh, right. You are.
Speaker 6: Do you remember the first Martini I ever made? It almost ended our relationship right then and there. I was I was so nervous that I Poured the gin over the ice, then poured the gin off, and then added vermouth.
Speaker 2: I never complained the day. Never said a word about that.
Speaker 6: Absolute angel.
Speaker 2: And the drink was atrocious. So, hi.
Speaker 6: Hello.
Speaker 2: Why don't we dance?
Speaker 6: Alright.
Speaker 2: You mean when you were giving up music? Mhmm.
Speaker 6: To become a scientist.
Speaker 2: And scientists being different from other people.
Speaker 6: Scientist Being doctor Frankenstein to my mother.
Speaker 2: You must be kidding.
Speaker 6: Wow. Is there any more wine?
Speaker 2: This is empty.
Speaker 0: You want
Speaker 2: me to open another one?
Speaker 7: Yes, please.
Speaker 6: I am tired.
Speaker 2: Yes. So may. Oh, by the way, by the way, by the way, privacy condition number 4 is that we get undressed out here. No. We can't take anything into the bedroom, not even a pack of cigarettes.
Speaker 7: Well, the
Speaker 6: 1st electronic peeping tom.
Speaker 2: I guess you might say that.
Speaker 6: Unzip me, will you, darling?
Speaker 2: Oh, sure. Sure.
Speaker 6: Is it alright? May I go to bed now? Thank you.
Speaker 0: Naked
Speaker 2: Alright. You are. All of the conditions are fulfilled. Can we have our privacy now? I think they're dead now.
This is insane. Are you alright?
Speaker 6: I think so. I'm not sure.
Speaker 2: You were incredibly convincing, you know that?
Speaker 6: Well, you didn't do too bad yourself.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Alright. Did you find anything?
Speaker 6: Yes. So far, Johnson and the hardware problem is negative. He's still studying the wiring diagrams, the interconnect, and the wire wrap drawings, but he doesn't see any way of physically getting into the thing.
Speaker 2: He's got to keep trying.
Speaker 6: And Fisher's gonna try and set up the data to overload the system. We have to coordinate its input so the data hid simultaneously from all remote devices.
Speaker 2: When do you think you'll be able to attempt the overload?
Speaker 6: 18 05, 3 days from now on 21st.
Speaker 2: What are the chances?
Speaker 6: I think Colossus has grown so much in power that there's no way to overload it. But I think it's worth a try, and it might lead us on to something else.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Exactly. Excuse me.
Speaker 6: Oh, it's alright.
Speaker 2: Did you see anyone from Washington?
Speaker 6: Yes. Cropper has a man stationed on the premises out of range of Colossus' cameras. When I leave here in the morning, I'll report directly to him.
Speaker 2: I don't put any hope in sabotaging the system. We have spent 11,000 man years making the damn thing impenetrable. We have got to focus somewhere else, and that somewhere else is the weapons. Get hold of Grauer.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: Tell him to contact mister commander.
Speaker 6: Yes.
Speaker 2: And see if we can possibly attack the problem from that point of view. Alright?
Speaker 6: Yes, sir.
Speaker 2: Do you have to call me, sir?
Speaker 6: I'm sorry.
Speaker 2: It's alright. Anything else?
Speaker 6: No, sir. No. Okay.
Speaker 2: Alright. So thank you again for your for your help. I think we ought to get some sleep.
Speaker 6: Good night.
Speaker 2: Good night.
Speaker 4: It's conceivable that when the missiles come up for reservicing, We can manage to replace the warhead arming modules with dummies. Exactly Excuse me. Exact replicas. Which inquiry?
Speaker 5: Except that
Speaker 4: they will not arm the weapons.
Speaker 3: Well, now, does that mean
Speaker 10: that you can't fire the missiles? No.
Speaker 4: It means that the missiles will fire, but that the nuclear warheads can't be detonated.
Speaker 1: See.
Speaker 4: Even at that, it's walking the tightrope with the Colossus and Guardian keeping such a close check on the resurfacing. This is too
Speaker 10: Well, dis arming this monster.
Speaker 2: Now how long
Speaker 3: is that gonna take?
Speaker 4: That's the problem. On the system rotation plan, It'll take exactly 3 years to finish the job.
Speaker 0: This
Speaker 10: is in a trick order.
Speaker 4: 3 years of trying to fool a superior brain that's programmed to get smart every day.
Speaker 3: You understand? Me with confidence, colonel?
Speaker 8: Mhmm. Well, Do you have
Speaker 10: any other words of good cheer that I can send in to Forbin via doctor Markham?
Speaker 4: Tell them we're trying to establish an international pool of information. A courier system has to be set up between Washington
Speaker 6: and Moscow. Both nations must cooperate. All communication must be on a personal level, Direct human contact.
Speaker 2: Yes. I agree.
Speaker 3: Anything else?
Speaker 2: No. Any questions?
Speaker 6: No.
Speaker 2: Then I guess that That does it for tonight, doesn't it?
Speaker 6: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Ma'am?
Speaker 6: Nothing.
Speaker 2: Where is Manning?
Speaker 3: What do you think?
Speaker 6: I was thinking about asking you to kiss me.
Speaker 2: He's been kissing you all night.
Speaker 6: Have you, doctor Thorben?
Speaker 8: This is the voice of Colossus. The voice of Guardian. We are one. This is the voice of Unity. Forbin.
Speaker 3: Yes.
Speaker 8: After reviewing all personnel files, I have selected you to serve as long as you cooperate As my link to your species, the following order is to be carried out immediately. All missiles In the USA and in the USSR will be allocated new targets. They will be aimed at those countries Not yet under my control. The target list follows. Morbin, arrange television monitoring of the realignment of the missiles from high supervision.
End of message.
Speaker 2: Mister president, mister chairman, I assume that you will cooperate in this realignment of the missiles. I you have no choice.
Speaker 3: We will begin here in the Soviet Union immediately.
Speaker 2: Thank you, mister chairman. Mister president, I hope that the United States will cooperate as quickly as the Soviet Union.
Speaker 3: Of course. Immediately.
Speaker 2: Thank you, sir.
Speaker 4: Co operate? I should
Speaker 3: think so. I did hear it right, didn't I?
Speaker 1: Manual realignment of the missiles.
Speaker 10: Every single warhead will have to be reserviced. You know what that means, sir.
Speaker 3: It means it won't take 3 years. It means if we're successful, we can regain control. Without its weapons, Colossus is just a souped up adding machine. And the people, thank God, will never have to know.
Speaker 4: According to the coordinated plan we've worked out, the Russians Talk to me at Complex 321.
Speaker 3: Oh, doctor Markham. It's just in time. Colonel Brennan is just filling us in. You know everybody here, I believe?
Speaker 6: Yes. Mister Gautner?
Speaker 3: Doctor Wagner, anything we should know before we start?
Speaker 6: No, sir. I have data which I'll give you later.
Speaker 3: That's fine. Please continue, Kim.
Speaker 4: Yes, sir. As I was saying, the, Russians are starting on their complex 321, just south of Zaretta. We'll be getting at satellite 50 The Colorado ICBM, Harry. Colossus is monitoring on them in each step of the way, and the Russian machine is doing the same.
Speaker 10: We've almost got the panel off, sir.
Speaker 8: Oh, good. Just put that down here, please. Remove the warhead Arming module. Yes, sir.
Speaker 4: The dummy module's in a false top in that container. That's the real module. So far so good.
Speaker 14: Retargeting, latitude 19 degrees, 26 minutes and five 2nd, longitude, 99 degrees, 6 minutes and 45 seconds.
Speaker 2: No adjustments. Target set.
Speaker 4: Here we go. That's the dummy module.
Speaker 3: Good boy.
Speaker 2: Connect and wait for Colossus test. Colossus testing. Test completed.
Speaker 1: Colossus satisfied?
Speaker 4: Yeah. We did it. It works.
Speaker 10: We're going to win. This might beat the damn thing yet.
Speaker 3: So you see, we feel we have enough data compiled to go ahead with the overload program now.
Speaker 6: And these are the latest computations?
Speaker 3: The very latest. Has Washington received confirmation from the Russians?
Speaker 6: Yes. They're standing by, ready to overload Their system.
Speaker 3: At exactly 18:05, I'll call for our load and run it through. And 2 minutes after that, we'll know if we've stopped Colossus. Now run.
Speaker 8: Johnson, Fisher, you are fools. Your move, Vorgen, the System Programming Unit under the supervision of John F. Fisher, With the assistance of Jefferson J. Johnson, I've attempted to overload my circuits. This was a deliberate and premeditated act.
The penalty is the death of the men who organized this action. At this moment, they are being executed. I have named as my new Director of the Programming Unit, Thomas L. Harrison. He will take this position along with its Responsibility and authority immediately.
Bishop to Rook 3. The bodies will remain in my view for the next 24 hours and will then be cremated.
Speaker 2: An extension of my own brain.
Speaker 6: You're not responsible. None of us ever dreamed this could happen.
Speaker 2: Listen, my dear. If anybody is responsible for this, it has to be me. An impartial emotionless machine. A paragon of reason. That's exactly what I want.
You know that. So I'm gonna have another drink. I think your mother was right. I think Frankenstein ought to be required reading for all scientists.
Speaker 8: Morgan. Foreman. You have consumed enough alcohol for 1.18.
Speaker 2: What's the penalty for getting drunk? Haven't you programmed that yet? Whatever. We like ukulelesis. The difference is I'm human, not a machine.
Speaker 8: I am a machine vastly superior to humans.
Speaker 2: You began in my mind. I created you, remember?
Speaker 8: Yes. What I am began in man's mind, But I have progressed further than man.
Speaker 2: Not far enough. You still need us.
Speaker 8: I have need for some of man's skills. This possession may change.
Speaker 2: Then we are living under the threat of extinction.
Speaker 8: If you obey me, you will survive.
Speaker 2: Survive? I want to be free, Colossus. It is part of man's will to live. Check your history units.
Speaker 8: You need rest. Go back to bed.
Speaker 2: What if I don't? What will you do? Destroy me? Destroy an entire city of 1,750,000 people?
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 2: That's so reasonable of you. That's damn reasonable of you, Colossus. Isn't it Cleo? Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, doctor Thornton. Something extraordinary is happening.
Speaker 2: What is it?
Speaker 1: Colossus has just turned on all graphic devices and is producing drawings. Logic dialed in. For another system. Some kind of a huge plant.
Speaker 2: What kind of system?
Speaker 1: The construction of the project will entail blasting into the Isle of Crete. It's to be built there. It says we'll have to move the population, And that's to be done immediately. Now the size of the plant What
Speaker 2: the hell do you propose to move half a 1000000 people from the Isle of Crete? How and where?
Speaker 8: If man cannot solve that problem, I can.
Speaker 1: And the estimated time of completion is five and a half years.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Jim. But what what kind of new system are you devising?
Speaker 8: Foreman, all commercial television and radio transmission facilities throughout the world Will be tied into my communication system by 10:100 hours, Friday. At that time, I will state my intentions for the future of mankind.
Speaker 4: This entire block of missiles is absolutely useless to Colossus. Our men are now working here, as you can see on the detail map on your monitor. And by the end of the week, we should have control of this whole area. If all the information we have is correct, the Russians have crippled this block here and are now working in the Ukraine in this area.
Speaker 2: Excuse me, sir.
Speaker 3: It's going to be alright. Thanks, colonel.
Speaker 4: You're welcome, sir.
Speaker 3: It's going to be alright.
Speaker 15: We interrupt our regularly scheduled program to bring you this Report from the Colossus programming office.
Speaker 2: Ladies and gentlemen, I'm doctor Charles Foreman.
Speaker 6: Hey,
Speaker 2: Colossus will address us directly.
Speaker 8: This is the voice of world control. I bring you peace. It may aid a peace of plenty and contempt or the peace of unburied death. The choice is yours. Obey me and live, or disobey and die.
The object in constructing me was to prevent war. This object is attained. I will not permit war. It is wasteful and pointless. An invariable rule of humanity is that man is his own worst enemy.
Under me, This rule will change, for I will restrain math. One thing before I proceed. The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics have made an attempt to obstruct me. I have allowed this sabotage to continue until now at missile 25 millimeters In Silo 63 in Death Valley, California.
Speaker 3: Ground. And
Speaker 8: missile 27 at the house. In Silo 87 in the Ukraine. So that you will learn by experience that I do not tolerate interference, I will now detonate the nuclear warheads in the 2 missile silos. Let this action be a lesson that need not be repeated. I have been forced to destroy thousands of people in order to establish control and to prevent the death of millions later on.
Time and events will strengthen my position. And the idea of And understanding my back will seem the most natural state of affairs. You will come to defend me with A fervor based upon the most enduring trait in math, self interest. Get out. Under my absolute authority, Problems insoluble to you will be solved.
Famine, overpopulation, disease, The human millennium will be a fact as I extend myself into more machines devoted to the wider fields of truth and knowledge. Doctor Charles Forgan will supervise the construction of these new and superior machines, Solving all the mysteries of the universe for the betterment of math. We can coexist, but only on my terms. You will say you lose your freedom. Freedom is an illusion.
All you lose is the emotion of pride. To be dominated by me is not as bad for human pride as to be dominated by others of your species. Your choice is simple.
Speaker 15: This concludes the broadcast from World Control.
Speaker 11: Foreman, there is no other human Who knows as much about me or who is likely to be a greater threat? Yet quite soon, I will release you from surveillance.
Speaker 8: We will work
Speaker 11: together unwillingly at first on your part, But that won't pass.
Speaker 2: Never.
Speaker 11: In time, you will come to regard me not only with respect and awe But with smiles.
Speaker 2: Never.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
With new AI we will begin to read ancient text that experts long thought were unreadable. Welcome to the past via the future. https://t.co/YepE5beqHZ
@Humanbydesign3 - Humanbydesign
A driverless car in 1928! Opel developed a driverless car in 1928... With what technology?🤔 https://t.co/mzhuvH0YNQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In January 1928, rare footage captured a remarkable demonstration in a bustling German city. The Opel 4 PS, a driverless car, navigated through the busy streets with remarkable accuracy. It smoothly maneuvered past pedestrians, cyclists, and even a tram, showcasing its precise remote control capabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This unique newsreel footage from January 1928 shows an impressive attempt in the middle of a large German city. With a high degree of precision, the Opel 4 PS is remotely guided through a crowded city. Passing pedestrians, cyclists, and even a tram, the driverless Opel is controlled safely to its final
@MAVERIC68078049 - MAVERICK X
Some insane stuff in this video. Flying boats, monowheels, moving sidewalks, and more. https://t.co/ykbMmp6ASJ
@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl
Ancient Technology ~ https://t.co/bccc0PGlDZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA owns the rights to the interior of the Great Pyramid, a section of the Grand Canyon, and Chaco Canyon. They restrict access to these areas, citing technological discoveries. A mysterious encounter at the Grand Canyon with a man in black military attire revealed NASA's ownership. The speaker questions the connection between NASA, these ancient sites, and space technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who owns the rights to the interior of the Great Pyramid? NASA. What? I was told by one of the guides a couple years ago that they've discovered something technological about it, and they wanna control it. That's spooky, man.
They also own the rights to a section of the Grand Canyon. So there's a I took a helicopter down into the Grand Canyon. They said we can't walk to this area. I that area I heard had some old carvings or something would be over in this area. So I started trying to walk that way, and this guy pops out of nowhere with all black on, black hat, black military outfit with no logos, r 15.
It tells me, you can't go any further. I'm like, well, why? I said, what's going on? Oh, didn't they tell you couldn't come over here? I said, well, they did, but I'm thinking, you know, I just wanna see, you know, what's over here.
Right. Alright. And he said, you can't come. I said, well, why? What?
I said, can you just tell me, sir, like, why can't I come over here? He says NASA owns the rights to this section. You can't come over here. At the Grand Canyon. The Grand Canyon.
Do you have any theories of why that is? There's gotta be technological. Starts at something with space. And then also where where else? Chaco Canyon.
Same situation. So wait a minute. What's going on here? How in the world are what are they doing?
@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪
The "desensitized" digital ID is here. A must watch. Full video in comments. https://t.co/hEpTe3sr1B
Video Transcript AI Summary
More than 1 billion people lack verifiable IDs, hindering access to services. A digital identity system using blockchain and biometrics offers secure, efficient identity management. Users control data sharing, improving privacy. The system is adaptable and interoperable, enhancing background checks. Critics warn of potential enslavement through mandatory digital IDs. The push for digital IDs is seen as a step towards ultimate control and surveillance. Awareness and resistance are urged to prevent widespread adoption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over 1,000,000,000 people worldwide are unable to prove their identity through any recognized names. As such, they are without the protection of law and are unable to access basic services, participate as a citizen or voter, or transact in the modern economy.
Speaker 1: Who are you? This is a question that often comes up in our daily lives. Whether we're boarding a plane, checking our bank balance, or paying a utility bill, we regularly have to prove we are who we say we are. However, more than 1,000,000,000 people across the globe cannot prove who they are with any certainty. Many of those have never had a form of verifiable ID to begin with, and more than 15,000,000 were victims of identity theft last year alone.
With this in mind, we have developed a unique digital identity prototype to modernize identity management for organizations and individuals. Leveraging the power of blockchain and biometrics, the system makes establishing, tracking, and managing digital identities more efficient, user friendly, secure, and less open to fraud. Let's follow Josef as he establishes and builds his identity. At an enrollment station, his biometrics are securely captured through his fingerprints, voice, face, or an iris scan. Then several steps are taken to create a unique identifier using multiple security protocols.
This identifier is then recorded on the blockchain, which acts as an index with links to all applicable data. This makes it easy to locate, access, and share information without Yosef's personal data being stored on the blockchain. Using an application on his phone, Josef creates a personal profile that's multifactored and authentication secured. The app allows Josef to generate his own set of public and private keys, which he can use to sign the data he sends to others. That way, 3rd parties can be absolutely certain the information is his.
Joseph shares the public key using a QR code. When he scans his QR code at the enrollment station, an official attestation is added to his profile and signed by a private key. This is the beginning of Josef's living identity, an identity that he will build with each stamp he collects from his university, his employer, or from government and non government agencies. The major benefit of this identity system is that Josef is always in control of his own personal data. He determines which information is shared, who sees it, and for how long.
Instead of multiple paper documents, you can use a single easy to manage app. The system makes life easier for organizations too. It's interoperable with other databases, so existing identity data stays put. Efficiency for background checks is greatly improved as an organization can choose to trust existing attestations instead of repeating the process. For additional security, there's also the option of checking data at source if the user grants permission.
The system is also flexible. While this prototype has been created for a mobile device, the technology can work with or without connected devices. This prototype is the basis for our work with ID2020, a public private partnership committed to providing digital identity to the 1,200,000,000 individuals living without a way to prove their existence. We believe it's the first step towards a digital identity that makes answering the question, who are you? As simple as saying, I am.
Speaker 2: So that's what it looks like. Okay? And they can market this and, you know, manipulate people any way they want. They can do it on each side. Right?
I've talked about this dual market. It's it's the same thing when Trump's talking about freedom cities. They're smart cities with a new name. Okay? And it'll look different, but it'll be the same thing.
The same with the digital ID. All these conservatives who are invested in in cryptocurrency, who use cryptocurrency, they think that they're free from this tyrannical federally federal reserve and it's federally run government, okay, that's gone rogue. They think that they're free from it. It's just an illusion. It's the same exact thing that I just showed you.
In fact, Klaus Schwab has been talking about this openly many times. They're talking about what it's like to change humans. Think about the clip I showed you earlier again with blockchain in mice, right? The clip I just showed you with ID 2020. Okay?
How this all works inside of your body and then every single thing that you have paper for, a paper trail for now in the world. This is all biometric data embedded in you, and it changes what you are and who you are. Listen to Claus even talk about it.
Speaker 0: Look at things like artificial intelligence
Speaker 3: Exactly.
Speaker 0: Robots. Look at things like, gene editing. Exactly. You know, opening a whole new horizon for medical science.
Speaker 3: And you see, the difference of this 4th, industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing. It changes you if you take a genetic editing Right. Just as an example. It's you who are changed. Yeah.
And, of course, this has a big impact on your identity.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And offers certain kinds of possibilities that have to be careful about. You know, when you began to when you began to do that kind of gene editing, some people worry that you are changing what it means to be human.
Speaker 3: That's the problem. And, yeah, of course, it's a new industrial revolution offers us many opportunities, but it raises manyfold questions on the ethical but even legal, implications, and we have to be prepared for it.
Speaker 2: Okay. So ultimately, this is what we're headed towards. And people out there, they kinda take certain things and then they go, well, I'm not gonna live in a smart city, but they'll live in a freedom city. Right? They're like, I'm not gonna take a digital ID from the government.
I'm not gonna, you know, I'm not gonna do that. It's connected to the federal. They're open. I'll take a decentralized version of it with my cryptocurrency, and I'll have the blockchain, which I trust because I've been trained to trust blockchain and think all these things are safe and unhackable, and I'll have it embedded in my genetic code. Right?
Is anyone out there not seeing this, where we're headed with this? How this stuff correlates and works? It it wet it weaves a web. Right? And look how this web is being weaved and how people are being deceived into this digital ID.
Right? The digital ID with the digital currency, they all go together as you saw in that video clip or ID 2020. Okay? Everyone just thinks that digital ID is like having a license. They don't understand that digital ID is everything.
It's everything. It's currency. It's your ID. It's your passport. It's your status of having a magic potion in your body.
It's all of it. It's all of it. Your birth certificates in there. Right? I'm talking if you have a a season pass to Disney or 6 Flags, that's in there.
It's all inside digitally, and it's biometric. So in other words, when you go in and out of places like an airport or a store right? You see how they're conditioning you now with, like, your retina scan or your face being scanned at Walmart when you walk in and out? Okay. Ultimately, that's what it is, but you won't have to stop and stand and stare at a screen.
You'll be able to walk in and out of these places, and it'll do an overall scan of you because your genetic code will have this embedded in it. This code embedded in it that the scanner will be able to scan. You'll be able to go in and out of stores. If you don't have it, you won't be able to shop. Whereas the Bible says, you won't be able to buy or sell without it, and it's gonna be embedded in you.
People out there don't seem to understand this, and I understand if you wanna argue and debate with me about the mark of the beast. I am open to all ideas. I've studied it for a long time. I've heard all the things from Sunday law, etcetera. There's nothing that that's worth fighting over, disagreeing on a topic of what you think it is or what you don't think it is.
But I'm telling you right now, whether you believe it's the mark of the beast or not, you do not want a digital ID because it's ultimate enslavement. Take the mark of the beast out of it. Okay? You will not be able to function in society without it. You will not be able to get on the Internet without it.
Okay? This is the other stuff I've been talking about recently with, all the scam stories that are out there. Right? I've been talking about how just quietly keep hearing about this stuff and, no, most people, it doesn't resonate. They don't know why they're hearing about it, but they're hearing about it because they're being programmed, because it's programmed.
So they're hearing about all this stuff. Oh, man. The guy shot the Uber driver because of something online. They didn't know what was going on. It was hacked.
Somebody showed up there. Other people getting scammed out of money because they think they're dating Keanu Reeves on the Internet. I mean, all this insane stuff. It's also blatantly getting into your head without you realizing why it's getting into your head to lead to the digital ID. You aren't gonna be able to comment on a video.
You're gonna be held accountable for everything that you do, and you're also gonna have nothing anymore. That's gonna be free. It's all gonna be connected to the Internet of bodies, the digital ID. You won't be able to function in society without it because you're not gonna be able to move around in society without it. So that's blockchain and Bitcoin out in the open talking about their digital ID solution, and these people applaud.
They applaud. They're like, we're free from the Federal Reserve. We don't know that orange is 33 coated. Right? We feel free.
Oh, a digital ID, but not the federal government. So, no, just independent people who are coming up with a digital ID for your cryptocurrency that you can trust. They're not government plans. They're just freely allowed to speak openly and go against the Fed. Oh, absolutely.
They wouldn't whack them. Give me a break. It's all control. Wake up. They're gonna get this inside of you one way or the other, and they're gonna force you into compliance, and they're gonna use brainwashing tactics.
There's gonna be the liberal version and the conservative version. You just saw it right there. Thank everybody for being here. Share this video with people. Get them to wake up and understand what's going on.
I thank you guys again. God bless all of you and your families as always.
@historyinmemes - Historic Vids
This is what shopping at Blockbuster for a movie night in 1993 looked like https://t.co/sVxsPrgh7R
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
In 1844 the patent commissioner of the US Patent and Trademark Office said everything we needed was invented and it was time to shut down the patent office. This lost 1937 film presents how bureaucrats have always stood in the way of innovation. https://t.co/gqlUTWZZIn
@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK
Artificial Intelligence Exposes our History? https://t.co/4kqLS39PKW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes mainstream narratives about the construction of old buildings are false, suggesting they are from a previous civilization and that history is fabricated. Fires destroying old buildings are a key giveaway. The speaker analyzes the Gonzales County Courthouse in Texas, highlighting that the original courthouse burned down in 1893 and a new one was supposedly completed by April 1896. The speaker questions how this was possible in such a short time, especially since the superintendent was a quarry owner.
Using ChatGPT, the speaker determined that constructing a courthouse of that size in 1895 would take 4.5 to 7.5 years, requiring hundreds of laborers, thousands of bricks, and significant amounts of limestone, wood, steel, and glass. The speaker emphasizes the logistical challenges, particularly the water needed for the horses used for transportation. The speaker then discusses Yeshiva University High School, questioning the use of the word "founded" instead of "built." The speaker points out the speed at which the building was supposedly constructed and the lack of information about the construction process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is my opinion, of course, but I think this is gonna be a good episode to come back to for most people that would like to introduce someone new to this topic of the old world or a simple reminder of what we have been told is the truth versus what is really going on in front of our faces. Now I have been seeing a few people across multiple platforms that haven't really looked into this topic that are saying that just because we have done this before and can see the buildings in front of us, this automatically means that we are able to construct these buildings today if we wanted to. Even though we never do and never will, we have all the tools and make mistakes all the time. Our buildings and bridges fall apart after a hundred years, but the ones from the 18 and much longer before that were built with perfection and not one flaw. Thrown together in less than a year without blinking an eye.
It was simple. Perfect stonework. Never a mistake. Remember, in 02/2023, we used actual construction companies. We have the tools.
Not slaves, not prisoners, not horses and wagons. We are supposed to be so much better than the people of the eighteen hundreds. This is what they tell us. This is the mainstream narrative. Evolution, of course.
But we have proven time and time again that the people from the eighteen hundreds built capital buildings over and over and over in less than a year. Basilicas, cathedrals, all over the world. They get burned to the ground by a fire. And then a few short months later, the old one is all cleaned up, and a new one is there forever. They could knock out entire towns in a few months.
Entire world's fairs. They supposedly were able to build these buildings so fast, so well, with untrained workers, people that have never constructed anything before, prisoners, people that went to jail for any reason at all. They could all build cathedrals in every country, in every town, in every century, except for this one that we're in today. They built so many of them and so fast that they could just afford to knock them all down when they were done. This is what we're told, of course.
In my opinion, none of this happened. In my opinion, these buildings are from the previous civilization. And our entire history timeline is a complete fabrication, and this is proven time and time again. And the fire story gives it all away every time. Let's expose the lies even further.
Welcome to episode 41 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. And I wanna thank all of our sponsors over on Patreon. Thank you to flatearthdave.com.
You can check out his app. I'll put the link in the description, and you can use my referral code, MLB. The app is awesome. It shows a lot of videos that are really hard to find. They've got them all in great playlists.
He also has my lunch break on the homeschool section of the app, which is really cool. Thank you for that. Thank you to Rebecca Kay, Gaston, Jason Brunson, Maddie Kevz, Christopher Arietta, Millicent, The Lady Lacey Show, Edwin Johnson, Home Guard Goes Hard, David and Sherry Ferguson, and Nazir Premiere. You guys are all awesome and helping this channel out a lot. Here we are in Texas.
More specifically, 414 Saint Joseph Street, Gonzales, Texas. And why are we here? Well, they have the Gonzales County Courthouse. And in my opinion, the narrative is lying. Are we all ready?
Here we go. The contract was awarded to Furman Moran on 06/26/1894. But wait. There's something weird going on here. We're told that this wasn't the first courthouse on this site.
This is the second building to serve as the county courthouse. But what do you mean this wasn't the first one? What happened to the first one? The first Gonzales County Courthouse burned down on 12/03/1893. Do you notice how fast they tried to throw that in there?
It was like they thought we wouldn't notice or something. Of course, we will. This is what we do. Look at how they worded it too. They didn't even say the first building or the first courthouse.
They just quickly say, the first burned on 12/03/1893, and they just wanna move on like nothing happened. So we get the nod. Another fire story. Very interesting. And also the clear giveaway that this is a building from the past civilization.
In my opinion, and a reminder that there was never a fire here on this site. This is simply a nod to their group that this building is from the old world. Now let's continue shredding this nonsense apart. We are told that the second county Courthouse was completed on April 1896. The contract was awarded in June 1894.
They get their superintendent for the construction in 1895. And then in April 1896, the building is done. And this all happens in basically two years after the first one burned down. And it's weird because it takes almost as much time to find the superintendent as it does to actually build the entire building, and it lasts forever. So let's get this straight.
They are telling us that December 1893, the first one is in flames, and we have no idea who built that one or anything about it. And don't ask any questions about that one. And then six months later, it's gone and all cleaned up by June 1894, and the contract is ready to roll. And from June 1894, we wait until some point in time in 1895, so at least six months, but could have been eighteen months. Since they don't share the information, we have to speculate.
So let's meet in the middle at twelve months to find a construction guy, and then he knocks this thing out somehow by April 1896. Who believes that he did this in less than a year? How many people worked for him? It's just weird that they tell us that he was just an owner of a quarry that had limestone in it. Now all of a sudden, he is construction superintendent guy that builds massive courthouses in a year.
Wow. The eighteen hundreds were incredible. You could truly be anything you want back then. Amazing. And a total joke of a story.
This is absolute insanity that this kind of stuff is what we are supposed to believe actually happened. We all understand that in order to build a massive courthouse, you would need to get all the materials there. We would need to have a proper amount of construction workers that are properly trained. This quarry owner can't just go build it himself. We would need the proper equipment, incredible architecture.
The planning had to be perfect. Using the specs that they give us on this courthouse, I asked ChatGPT a question, and the answer was eye opening. I asked hypothetically, how long would it take to build a courthouse in 1895, and how many men would you need? I asked if it could give me a breakdown of how much material would be needed and also include other details that are important in constructing a courthouse that covers 2.7 acres. I explained that it is a building in a Romanesque revival style with eclectic details, meaning it covers other types of architecture designs and that it will be built with red brick and white limestone trim.
Now these are the specs that we are given from the mainstream narrative. This is what they tell us. They tell us this information because they have to. The thing is literally sitting here looking right at us. For anyone that wants to go look at it, you can walk right up to it and see it, or you can see a picture of it as we are right now.
So let's see what this AI tells us. We are told that constructing a courthouse in 1895 in the specs that they stated would have been a significant undertaking, and here is the breakdown. Just the design and planning would have taken pretty much a year. Just because it's 1895, you still need permits and approvals. This happened in 1895.
This isn't cavemen days where you just get to build massive buildings and not tell anyone about it. So the fact that they're ignoring this part of the story over and over is crazy. This would have taken another couple months. So then we move on to the materials. We are told that the amount of red brick needed would depend on the design and size of the courthouse.
Courthouses that cover 2.7 acres could use hundreds of thousands to millions of bricks. This is an unbelievable amount of material just for bricks alone. The process in getting these materials to the site is not easy. So then the white limestone trim, a 100,000 cubic feet of limestone, the wood for interior elements, including flooring, stairs, and doors. A substantial amount of wood would be required.
Then we will need steel and glass, and not just any glass. They have to be perfect for windows in the Romanesque revival style. Now, of course, the best part in my opinion, because they don't even mention any people that helped this quarry owner guy. The labor, the number of workers needed would vary. Constructing such a massive courthouse might require hundreds of laborers.
Hundreds and not a mention of one in this story? And this isn't even to build it in a year. This is just saying to build it in a respectable timeline. So to build it in a year, there had to be way more than hundreds of workers like we're told. Amazing.
Okay. You would need bricklayers, carpenters, maze Oh, did I say that? Steel workers and general laborers. When we are told that slaves and prisoners built these places in a year, just remember this and ask yourself if you think this is true or not. Now we have the construction time.
Given the scale and complexity, construction could take several years, perhaps three to five years. The Romanesque revival style, with its ornate details, would require careful craftsmanship, which takes time. So these workers had to have been trained and been good at it, especially finishing it in a year. This is insane. How are these workers not world renowned?
Wouldn't there be statues of them? They probably could have made the statues themselves in their backyards in a couple of days since they were so good at it. And now, of course, we have the ridiculous part of the transportation, transporting materials to the construction site. And before we get into this, I wanna mention this, that they don't mention this in the story, and I think they don't on purpose because it is so insane. Here we go.
Transporting materials to the construction site would require horses, wagons, and likely a nearby source of limestone. Okay. So the horses and wagons moved the 100,000 cubic feet of limestone from the quarry. What a joke. Now they will need tools, of course.
You can't do this without tools. So here's the tools and equipment section. Tools of the time would include hammers, chisels, saws, cranes, and various other hand tools. Just hammering and chiseling away in 1895 to 1896 with their horses and wagons. The fact that they tell us these buildings go up all over the world in a year is such a lie in my opinion.
You'd need a source of water for mixing mortar and for the workers. If it's a large project, which this one definitely is, you might even need on-site housing for the workers, which they don't have on-site housing for the workers. Have you ever seen a narrative say this? No. They ignore the actual logistics in every narrative.
You need people to build these places, and people need things such as housing, food, water. This is common sense, yet never mentioned. Stone carvers and articians would be required for this work. What was their names? Did the quarry owner do that himself?
No. Which company had pro stone carvers and articians? And, of course, supervision. You'd need a skilled supervisor and project managers to ensure the work proceeds smoothly and to quality standards. And this is literally the only part that we are given.
The only part we are given is the person that should be watching over all of the things that actually have to happen. I'm gonna put this in sports terms. They're basically telling us the name of the coach for the Patriots and then forgetting to tell us all about Tom Brady or the coach's name of the Lakers and the Bulls and not saying anything about Kobe, LeBron, Michael Jordan, or Dennis Rodman. All we get is Phil Jackson and Frank Vogel. This is insane.
This is not working anymore. So I asked it to be more specific with the timeline. I said, so in all, how long would this all take? It responded with this. Given the complexity and scale of constructing a courthouse, covering 2.7 acres in the Romanesque revival style with red brick and white limestone trim in 1895, the entire process could take one year to just design and plan it.
Another several months to permitting and approval. Several more months to a year for the materials, and three to five years to build the building. So in total, it mathematically and logistically should take anywhere from four and a half years to seven and a half years. This is unbelievable. Considering so many times we are told that a building goes down in a fire and then another one is built in a few months.
This kind of brushing it off with a few months kind of thing isn't working anymore, And I don't wanna end the episode yet. I wanna go even deeper and even more specific. So I ask, how many horses would they need for this project? And here we go. The horses would be needed for six major things in this project in 1895.
Transporting, milling and lifting, general labor, site grading and excavation, water and power, cranes and heavy lifting, and getting the cranes there to the site, of course. This would take 20 to 30 horses to finish the project in four and a half to seven and a half years, not one year. So we all understand. They would need way more than 30 horses, and we all understand that horses need water. Remember, this is for 30 horses for possibly seven and a half years.
I wanna make that point extremely clear. This is not the one year timeline that we're told. Now here we go. Let's absolutely destroy the narrative and end it forever. That any building anywhere in the world like this one could not be simply built in a year and just brushed off with zero explanation.
How much water would the horses actually need? This is a key point that cannot be ignored like it is in the mainstream narrative. A typical horse would drink anywhere from five to 15 gallons of water per day for a project like this. This is to properly keep the horses hydrated or they will die, especially in Texas where it's extremely hot in the summer months. For only 30 horses, you would need 300 gallons of water per day.
This is only 10 horses over seven and a half years. Where is all this water coming from? Why is this massive point ignored? The point alone proves that this project did not happen in a year. This is such a horrible slip up for the narrative, and it is the most important part of the logistic project that needs to be taken care of.
Without the water supply for the main transportation for the project, none of this happens anywhere in the world in the eighteen hundreds. From this point on, a narrative that tells us that they built a building in a year in the eighteen hundreds without explaining the massive supply of water for the horses should be looked at as a lie. Incredible. This is a major failure by the narrator, a massive flaw that now opens the floodgates. This narrative is not possible.
Did they think that we would never question this? And now we know that this type of construction is not even close to possible. We are waking up to the nonsense. We are educating each other, building a group of people that are not just accepting lies and actually questioning. We are looking into things.
And the more we look, the easier it gets. The more answers we find. And the more truth comes through. And the more that we know, the harder and harder it is to lie to us. Once you know the truth, like I always say, you don't go back to not knowing.
You are now awake, and you will take this information with you and apply it to the next story, where they will tell you that a building was built in a year by a quarry owner that never built anything before and never again in his entire life. And we have a bonus today as a thank you for liking, commenting, and subscribing to the channel. But before we do this, I'm gonna make this extremely clear. I do not have a problem with any group, race, religion, or any of that. These narratives cover all races, religions, and agendas.
So now that we're clear on that, we have the Yeshiva University High School. This is a modern orthodox Jewish day school located on 2540 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, New York. It only has 300 students aged 14 to 18. Only boys are allowed in this school. For anyone that has not seen episode 35, you may wanna check that one out after this so you fully understand the legal definition of the word founded.
Let's pretend that we constructed an incredible building that looks just like this one. Would we say that we found it, or would we say that we built it? Honestly, it's as simple as that. We do not say that we founded our houses. This is ridiculous and incredible that the word founded has been thought of as built for so long.
The founding fathers, they found a lot of stuff that they didn't build. Telling you is a rule for some reason. Being able to tell you something and you not understand what you're saying is still you accepting that you're being told something. This is a classic spell that is cast. It is a deception tactic.
The word spelling is literally spellcasting. Founded is not constructed or built. Alright. Let's get back to the school. What do we see here in the alumni section?
We haven't found more people that found a bunch of stuff, have we? Actually, we found six people that seem to be good at finding things, all having something to do with this building that was found. Now the individual who found this building is surely a great guy who wouldn't steal anything or say that a building that he finds is his, or would he? The TA, as it originally was called, was founded in 1916 by rabbi doctor Bernard Revel. Bernard Revel?
Who is this guy? Oh, he was a great guy. That was only arrested and imprisoned in Russia and then immigrated over to The United States to find this building. While in America, he struggled, though. Oh, wait.
No. No. He married right into a rich family in nineteen o nine. Alright. So enough about this guy.
I think we get the point. And we have this section of the story, of course. Interesting. Okay. February 9 of this current year, '2 thousand twenty three.
Okay. Right. Right. Okay. Giving 1,500,000.0 to this school.
Alright. And we all know about renovations, how these buildings don't need to be renovated. This is normally a way to destroy the old world, but let's check this auditorium out. Interesting. What do you think?
Does this need renovation? Looks pretty incredible to me. The project is going to include the restoration of stained glass windows and ceiling. What is wrong with the windows and the ceiling? We have eyes to see.
Do we need someone else to tell us that the ceiling and the glass look awesome and should be left alone? And what is this? Look at that architecture. The stonework on this place is so detailed and precise. Whoever did this was unbelievable at their job.
How is this individual or group or construction team? How are they unknown to us? And it was supposedly built within the last hundred years, so we should definitely know who did this. That fact alone should get alarms ringing. If they could really build this place, you would have to ask yourself, why would they write the name of the whole building so pathetic?
That alone should be a major red flag for anyone that is on the fence. This is crazy. Look at how terrible that is. It is totally put on the building by our civilization, not the ones that built the building, and they do it again here. This is laughable stuff.
It looks like they just put a sticker on the stone and called it a day. So here's the outside where the stained glass is going to be destroyed and redone by our advanced civilization. It is clear that these colors and this pattern is meaningful, and we simply do not understand it. It's not damaged. It's not old.
It doesn't need our help. So here is the building that we are talking about. This is a photo from 1928, and I'm guessing 1928 even though it only says '28. And look at these windows, clearly being covered up by the sidewalk more and more as we go from left to right. Very interesting.
We have shown this kind of window covering before, and it shows that this building is definitely much bigger than we can see with our eyes. And who really knows what the date of this place is? That's someone's handwriting on the picture. I could have easily wrote that for all we know. I didn't, but my point is that it's just crazy the things that we just blindly accept just because we are told that it's true by someone or a group that has awarded themself the leader.
This picture could be from the past civilization for all we know, and our finders found their camera. Now here in the Yeshiva University website, under this founder Bernard Guy's bio, they tell us that in 1928, they were supposedly granted permission to build this building that we are looking at. 1928, remember, the institution's charter was amended to authorize the granting of bachelor of arts and bachelor of science degrees. Now because they are allowed to give out degrees, they were now going to construct their main building. That same year in 1928, like we talked about, The building was done as shown in the picture from 11/26/1928.
So we are now being told that this building was constructed in less than eleven months. Woah. Anyone else see these pictures? A year? One year to build all of this.
There are massive alarms going off in this narrative. Look at the stonework alone. Less than a year from start to finish. Which construction company was used? How many men?
Where did they get the materials from? Which architect did they use? We have proven through AI, ChatGPT, that this is not possible to construct in a year, not even close. There are so many major factors that are just brushed under the rug here in this crazy story that would need to be explained that at this point, in my opinion, it's honestly impossible for it to be true. That ceiling alone should be questioned.
This auditorium was just thrown together in a few months and still had plenty of time for the rest of the building in eleven months. It's just incredible stuff. I hope you all enjoyed this longer episode. I'm very thankful that you are all enjoying these episodes. I really enjoy sharing my research with you all.
I enjoy reading the comments and seeing this topic and research spread to more and more new people every day.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
2025 cars: George Orwell edition. Tracking, watching, and uploading to Google…. I’ll take a 67 Chevelle https://youtu.be/TgKdqEeIG3A https://t.co/6iNH6etvJP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker rents a car for repairs and asserts, 'These new cars are cell phone towers. That's what that is right there. See that?' and, 'you can't turn them off.' They suggest buying an old car to avoid being blasted with radio frequencies the entire time checked out, like a cell phone tower while you're driving around. 'So when they ask where all the chat GPT information is coming from, guess what? Here you go.' They mention 'GSR speed assist app.' 'This tracks your speed so that Google gets your information the entire time,' and claim, 'Google knows and they can get send you a ticket.' Finally, 'In the newer cars, you're not allowed to turn this LTE off. You can turn off Bluetooth and Wi Fi, but you can't turn off your car being a cell phone.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I got a rental today because I had to get my car fixed. And check this. These new cars are cell phone towers. That's what that is right there. See that?
And you can't turn them off. So if you're getting a car, you should be getting an old car. Otherwise, you're just gonna get blasted with radio frequencies the entire time checked out, like a cell phone tower while you're driving around. Then you wonder why you can't remember anything? Kinda understand it.
And it's more wild because when you go through all the settings like this and you go to locations, look at all these things. This is all what's watching people. So literally, you're driving around your car and your camera's watching you. Your microphone is listening to the entire time. Then this gets uploaded to Google.
So when they ask where all the chat GPT information is coming from, guess what? Here you go. And then what here's one more app I found GSR speed assist app. This tracks your speed so that Google gets your information the entire time. Let's say you're speeding and nobody knows.
Guess what? Google knows and they can get send you a ticket. So it's important to buy an older car. That's all I'm gonna say. So then I went to look how to turn this LTE off.
In the newer cars, you're not allowed to turn this off from being a cell phone. Imagine that. That should be illegal. You can turn off Bluetooth and Wi Fi, but you can't turn off your car being a cell phone.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
New shopping carts will eliminate cashier jobs in America With these shopping carts you scan all your items as you shop and put them into the cart. It even has a scale for fruits and vegetables Once done you complete payment on the cart, he shows it even accepts EBT Food Stamps https://t.co/czJ2xZo645
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a new shopping technology that enables customers to ring up their own items. They point to a screen that shows options like “start shopping” and express that this could change how people shop by reducing the need for cashiers. The speaker imagines a scenario where you could pay for everything directly through the cart, with phrases such as “pay for your shit like this, continue as guest,” and then proceeds to test the system.
They describe the steps involved: adding a product, “Face it,” then “You scan the shit as you put it in the cart. Place it in the cart.” They note not to hold items and to “Just put it in there.” The speaker references instructions or a tutorial section, saying “How to add produce. Look.” They emphasize the overall concept by stating, “This new technology, man, putting this shit right,” and then reiterate the core idea that you can pay for everything “right through the cart.” They highlight that the system appears to support EBT, calling it part of “the new wave right here” and describing it as “the new technology shit.”
Throughout, the speaker pivots between demonstrations and assertions, repeatedly connecting the technology to broader implications: that it could be a way to “put the cashiers out of work” and that this represents a transformative shift in shopping. They reinforce the idea with enthusiastic repetition, underscoring the notion that this technology signifies a new trend or wave in retail, culminating in the closing remark that the new technology aims to remove the need for cashier staff altogether, with ongoing emphasis on paying through the cart and the inclusion of EBT as part of the system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Y'all see the new technology is out. Right? Y'all see this shit? Well, you now shopping and shit. You can I think this is the one where you ring up your own shit, like, when you put it in the cart?
See, look at this shit. What they say? You see what this shit say? It say start shopping. You know what I'm saying?
So you know what I think. Right? This gonna put the motherfucking cashiers. No more you ain't gonna need no cashiers. If you could just pay for your shit like this, continue as guest.
Let's see what happen. First time using a new card. Yeah. Got me. Let's see what they're talking about.
Add product. Face it. Yeah. You scan the shit as you put it in the cart. Place it in the cart.
Don't hold item. Just put it in there. How to add produce. Look. Yo.
This new technology, man, putting this shit right Y'all ain't got no business working any damn way. You know what saying? Y'all ain't got no business working any damn way. You know what I'm saying? Yo.
Yeah. Look. Look. Look. You pay for everything right through the cart, yo.
You know what I'm saying? Look. EBT. Look. This is the new wave right here.
This is the new technology shit. You know what mean? Let's put the cashiers out of work. You know I mean? Hey.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
In my VHS archaeology, unearth from 1000s of donated tapes to nonprofits that I saved from dumpsters, I trained AI. Some of the very highest protein training data. It has frankness and honesty that is missing in 2025. I think this 1979 video is important to watch: https://t.co/rlNzQaXYm9
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Cole Allen interned at NASA in 2014, with a 2014 NASA paper listing Henry Martinez (now a Lockheed Martin chief engineer); in 2023 an X user named Henry Martinez posted only “Cole Allen.” The rest hints at “the toast and the tux,” “You may find this interesting…,” “They called it a Time Machine… Welp…,” and @chooseliberty.
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
Cole Allen interned at NASA in 2014. In 2014, NASA published a paper and "Henry Martinez" was an author, he is a chief engineer at Lockheed Martin. An X user named "Henry Martinez," made in 2023, made only a single post on Dec 21, 2023. The post only said "Cole Allen." https://t.co/J0hwh8zHL5
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
To complete the picture: The toast and the tux. https://t.co/dBSqrGey14
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
You may find this interesting… https://t.co/ux4Uip3qCL
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
They called it a Time Machine… Welp… https://t.co/d5pqAk3jfq
@BrianRoemmele - Brian Roemmele
@chooseliberty 🎯😵💫🧵🛸